Loading...
PC - Minutes - 11-05-620 CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of November 5, 1962 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was held in the Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Buchanan at 7:40 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice- Chairman Buchanan. 2. Present: Commissioners: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, Crabtree, Wilt. Absent: Commissioners: McCaffree. Ex officio: Boyko, Farrell, Flanery, Phillips, Wroe. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Wilt stated that on page 4, Item 3, should read as follows: "Chairman Wilt stated that the curb and gutter develop- ment on Earle Street had a few problems, but looks very nice as developed by the.L. A. Drug Company. It.seems that setbacks and landscaping in industrial areas should be covered in an ordinance to prevent future problems." Advisor Flanery stated that on page 1, Item 3, paragraph 1, fourth line should read "In addition to the access to both parcels by means of the alley there ". Also page 3, Item 2, line 3, after "loaned" add "leased''. (MO) It was moved by Kunz, second by Casares, and unanimously carried that the minutes of October 15, 1962, be approved as corrected. ADMINISTRATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 4. PLOT PLAN NO. 82 - BRUCE PRENTICE - 8844,E. MARSHALL STREET (Rearranged) Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding the rearrangement of this plot plan which will now provide for a future cul -de -sac development with the property to the west. C.A. Farrell explained that a drainage easement would be furnished to provide adequate drainage. Advisor Flanery explained that this was a revised plot plan showing 3 parcels instead of the original plan which showed only 2 lots. The plan should read proposed carports instead of garages as this is what the owner intends to build. Mrs. J. Buck, 3714.N. Muscatel, owner of Parcel B, stated that they bought this lot in good faith andtiere not told about having to install any improvements to bring it up to code standards. They would like all of these improvements, but cannot afford Commissioner Wilt stated that this is a much better arrangement. (MO) It was moved by Crabtree, second by Kunz, that Plot Plan No. 82 submitted for rearrangement be approved subject to the Planning Commission's Standard Requirements. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Wilt, Crabtree, Buchanan. Noes: None. Absent: McCaffree. 5. PLOT PLAN NO. 78 - MALOOF - 3714, 3710 and 3718 N. MUSCATEL AVE. (Revised) Advisor Flanery explained that this was a revised plot plan showing 3 parcels instead of the original plan which showed only 2 lots. The plan should read proposed carports instead of garages as this is what the owner intends to build. Mrs. J. Buck, 3714.N. Muscatel, owner of Parcel B, stated that they bought this lot in good faith andtiere not told about having to install any improvements to bring it up to code standards. They would like all of these improvements, but cannot afford PC 11 -5 -62 • 1] same at the present time due to medical obligations. Furthermore, they would not.have purchased this property if they had known about these requirements. Attorney Boyko explained that the Bucks can not be compelled legally to bring this lot up to standard at this time. However, any improvements desired in the future, the owner would need to bring this property up to standard at that time. Attorney Boyko further stated that all 3 parcels are in violation and that the Commission has three alternatives for action. 1. Refuse to approve, which would leave this plot plan where it is, or, 2. Approve and hope that the Bucks will do their improve- ments, or, 3. Approve and let the property owners work out this problem the best they can. Commissioner McCaffree arrived at this time. (MO) After further discussion it was moved-by Casares, second by Wilt, that the revised Plot Plan No. 78 be approved, subject to the P1ann.i.ng ion Is Standard Requirements, to be completed within one year from this date of approval. Mr. Maloof stated that Jerry Sandusky handled the sale and prepared the original plot plan and they were not aware at that time these problems would be created. (AMO) It was moved by Crabtree, second by Wilt, that the motion be amended that Plot Plan No. 78, if not complied with at the end of the one year approval it would automatically be turned over to the District Attorney. (RC) Roll call vote on the amendment was as follows: Ayes: McCaffree, Wilt, Crabtree. Noes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan. Absent: None. (RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Wilt, Buchanan. Noes: Crabtree. Absent: None. This plot plan is to be on the agenda for the meeting of November 4 1963, which is one year from date of this approval. NEW BUSINESS 6. PLOT PLAN NO. 112 - SCHULZ BROS. - 3866 N. RIO HONDO AVENUE Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this plot plan. This is a corner lot and all three parcels will have separate driveways. (MO) it was moved by Crabtree, second by Taylor, that Plot Plan No. 1.12 be approved subject to the Planning Commission's Standard Requirements. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Wilt, Crabtree, Buchanan. Noes: None. Absent: done. LEGISLATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 7. REPORT ON BILLBOARDS C.A. Farrell submitted the report on Billboards to be reviewed and studied by the Planning Commission. - 2 - 0 PC 11 -5 -62 (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Kunz, and unanimously carried that this report be deferred to the meeting of December 3, 1962. 8. REPORT - STORAGE OF BUSSES IN A -1 AND R -3 ZONES AS PART OF CHURCH ACTIVITIES - BOYKO Attorney Boyko presented the Commissioners with a written report regarding this matter. The report stated that the use of buses in conjunction with church activities is automatically permitted in A -1 and R -4 zones. However, in an R -3 zone a plan would need to be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval before parking facilities may be installed. Vice- Chairman Buchanan stated if there were no objections this report would be received and filed. There were no objections. NEW BUSINESS 9. SET DATE FOR GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING Secretary Wroe stated that Muscatel School would be available on Monday, November 19, 1962, at 8:00 o'clock p.m. for the Public Hearing on the proposed General Plan. The legal notice will be prepared for publication by the staff. Vice- Chairman Buchanan stated if there were no objections it would be so ordered. There were no objections and it was so ordered. Discussion was held that the Planning Commission will call the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chambers and adjourn to Muscatel School for the Public Hearing. 10. COMMUNICATIONS None. Il. MATTERS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF A. PROPOSED LOFTUS DRIVE Advisor Flanery stated that the staff has a problem in regard to requests for lot splits on Glendon Way and on Marshall Street due to the proposed street. He would like to know what the Commission wants in regard to the 30 foot allowance for the proposed future street. Attorney Boyko suggested that the plot plans be so arranged to provide for this future street. C.A. Farrell stated that this type of development should be done as a whole to provide for proper drainage, paving, etc. A written report was requested from the City Attorneys office regarding the setting aside of land for possible future street purposes. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Kunz, and unanimously carried that the meeting adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 9:48 o'clock p.m. Next regular meeting will be Monday, November 19, 1962 at 7:30 o'clock p.m. CHAIRMAN SECRETARY - 3 -