Loading...
PC - Minutes - 04-01-630 CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of April 1, 1963 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers, 3815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt at 7:45 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Taylor. 2. Present: Commissioners: Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Absent: Commissioners: Casares. Ex officio: Flanery, Hassenplug, Phillips, Wroe. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MARCH 18, 1963. Chairman Wilt stated that on page 1, Item 3, second paragraph the following should be added "and a report prepared." Chairman Wilt stated that on page 2, last line add "and southeast corner." Commissioner Buchanan stated that on page 4, Item B, third line delete the word "outstanding' and add "undeveloped." (MO) It was moved by Buchanan, second by Wilt, and unanimously carried that the minutes of March 18, 1963, be approved as corrected. ADMINISTRATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 4. None NEW BUSINESS 5. PLOT PLAN NO. 123 - CHAS. F. AND ELIZABETH HENNINGS - 4456 NORTH EARLE STREET. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this plot plan as follows: There would be four parcels; A - 17,200 sq. ft. with 2 existing homes and a second two -car garage is proposed; B - 5,084 sq. ft., C - 5,084 sq. ft. and D - 5,675 sq. ft. An 13 foot wide paved easement would be provided to serve parcels B, C and D plus the rear of Parcel A. The staff recommends the denial of this plan as it is in conflict with the 'Community Design Plan for Future Development of Deep Lot Areas," The proposed right -of -way of Halkett Avenue passes through Parcels C and D. Otherwise this plan meets the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. Irene Richardson spoke in the absence of Mrs. Kate Richardson, owner of 42 acres south of Mission Drive, also J.A. Richardson owns 1.08 acres and David B. Richardson owns a westerly parcel approximately 1.15 acres. The family has had many approaches to sell for different uses, however they have no intention or interest in selling particularily for single family dwelling use. Chairman Wilt stated that this type of discussion should have been brought up at the General Plan hearings. The Commission is discussing a lot split plan now. Charles Hennings, 4456 No. Earle St., owner stated he had heard about the General Plan but would like to know when this area will be used for Subdivision. 4/1/63 Secretary Wroe read parts of the Lot Split Report which pointed out the advantages of developments on public streets compared to developments on community driveways or private streets. Commissioner Crabtree stated that there is very much vacant prop- erty adjacent and a better plan could be provided for this area. Commissioner Buchanan stated he would prefer to wait a little while before taking any action until the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance is adopted. After further discussion applicant and owner Chas. Hennings stated he would withdraw his plan without prejudice. (MO) It was moved by Buchanan, second by McCaffree and unanimously carried that the Planning Commission accept the withdrawal of Plot Plan No. 123 without prejudice. 6. MULTIPLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - JAMES S. FLOE - 8723 EAST MISSION DRIVE Secretary Wroe read the request from the owner that the Planning Commission consider and discuss this proposed apartment develop- ment. Advisor Flanery explained that this development is not in the proper zone therefore the Commission is not in a position to take any action or express their feelings in regard to this matter. Chairman Wilt stated this was discussed informally after the last regular meeting and that is on the agenda in error. Attorney Hassenplug explained that this would require a zone change or zone exception and a public hearing would be necessary. This matter should be handled by staff at this time. Mr. James Floe, owner in escrow, stated he would like some indication from the Commission as to their feelings in regard to this development in conjunction with the General Plan and Community Design Plan. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections the owner would be referred to the staff for any further procedural information. There were no objections and it was so ordered. LEGISLATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 7. None. NEW BUSINESS 8. GENERAL PLAN - CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION RE: MUSCATEL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT Secretary Wroe read the memo from the staff referring this matter to the Planning Commission from the City Council as follows: "At the adjourned regular meeting of March 19, 1963, the City Council voted unanimously to alter the General Plan to show Muscatel School development moved north to the present south boundary of the school property. Chairman Wilt explained that at the last meeting of the City Council they voted to leave the Bentel Avenue extension on the General Plan. Therefore the school property should not be shown so far to the south on the General Plan. - 2 - 4 -1 -63 (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Taylor, and unanimously carried that the Planning Commission concurs with the action of the City Council to alter the General Plan to show the Muscatel School site moved north to the present southerly boundary. COMMUNICATIONS 9. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PLANNING CONGRESS Secretary Wroe announced the next regular meeting will be Thursday, April 11, 1963, 7 :00 o'clock p.m. in South Gate. Topic of this meeting to be "Legislative Matters Affecting Planning." 10. MATTERS FROM COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. EXISTING NON - CONFORMING USES - C ZONES. Advisor Flanery prepared a memo for the Planning Commissioners use in regard to the problem which has arisen on Valley Boulevard where most of the structures are utilizing more than 50% of the lot area thus not providing enough parking space. When these buildings become vacant and a new use moves in it becomes a violation of the Zoning Ordinance. As long as the same use is maintained it is a legal non- conformance use. Secretary Wroe read a memo prepared for the commission as follows: ''At the City Council meeting of March 19, 1963, City Administrator Farrell advised the Council that a problem has arisen concerning a technicality in the present and proposed zoning ordinances re- stricting development of C -zone property to 50% of the lot area without consideration of additional properties in the same owner- ship restricted to parking use only. Mayor Andersen referred this matter to the Planning Commission for consideration at tis next meeting and stressed the urgency of the problem." (MO) After furtherdiscussion it was moved by McCaffree, second by Kunz, that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare an ordinance in line with the suggestions of Advisor Flanery and the City Council. Advisor Flanery stated the ordinance should include convenient access of parking, that a parcel zoned P should be under one ownership or a lease of at least 40 years and be in the same block as the C zone to be developed. Alley access in accordance with Sections 261 and 750 of the present Zoning Ordinance or Section 9118.02 of the proposed Zoning Ordinance. Also perhaps a bond should be required to cover parking district costs. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent.: Casares. B. C ZONE USES - VACANT NON - CONFORMANCE USE. Advisor Flanery referred to his memo listing uses for vacant C zoned structures of which structures are non - conforming because of conditions in Sections 255B and 749. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections this matter would be on the agenda of the next regular meeting. There were no objections and it was so ordered. C. 1963 -64 BUDGET. Secretary Wroe explained that the time for preparation of the budget is nearing and the Administrative office would like recom- mendations from the Planning Commission in regard to their needs for the coming fiscal year. Forms will be prepared for the Commissioners to use and this item will be on the next agenda. - 3 - 0 4 -1 -63 D. R -3 DEVELOPMENT STUDY COMMITTEE. 0 Commissioner McCaffree stated that this Committee had their first meeting last week to get organized and the next meeting will be April 10, 1963 at 5:15 o'clock p.m. at the City Hall. E. MOVE -IN COMMITTEE Commissioner Kunz reported on the activity of this Committee and that they will need a little more time to complete their report. F. SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Commissioner McCaffree announced that the next meeting will be April 9th, 12 :00 noon at the Santa Fe Inn. Topic will be 'Development of Industry in the San Gabriel Valley." G. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PLANNING CONGRESS Commissioner Crabtree reported on the last meeting as being very enlightening and interesting especially on how City of Commerce handled off- street parking. (MO) It was moved by Crabtree, second by McCaffree and unanimously carried that the meeting adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 9:52 o'clock P.M. Next regular meeting will be April 15, 1963, at 7:30 O'clock p.m. CHAIRMAN SECRETARY W -4-