Loading...
PC - Minutes - 05-06-63CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of May 6, 1963 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt:at 7 :45 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led Commissioner Buchanan. 2. Present: Commissioners: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Absent: Commissioners: None. Ex officio: Boyko, Hassenblug, Phillips, Wroe. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 15 and 16, 1963 Commissioner Buchanan stated that on page 5, Item 7,. No.: 3.:ofF motion add "and that the curbs, gutter and sidewalk requi -re ment be waived for the Walnut Grove portion of the property." (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Crabtree, and unanimously Carried that the minutes of April 15, 1963, be approved as`; - corrected. (MO) It was moved by Buchanan, second by Casares, and unanimously carried that the minutes of April 16, 1963, be approved as printed. ADMINISTRATIVE: OLD BUSI 4. PLOT PLAN NO. 127 (REVISED) - 9450 E. RALPH STREET - MCCALLON Secretary ! presented the factual data concerning this revised plan. The only change made is the relocation of the garage on Parcel 1 to provide guest parking. Discussion was held in regard to the possibility of having only one driveway to serve both parcels, also the size of the tots were refigured and discussed. Mrs. McCallon, owner, stated that the drive serving Parcel 2 would be part of the rear property and be clear of any easements. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Taylor that.Plot Plan No. 127- Revised- be approved subject to the Planning Commission's Standard Requirements and the following conditions: 1. That the guest parking on Parcel 1 be moved to the west side and the garage moved to the east side of the parcel. 2. That there be one driveway 16 feet wide serving both parcels. 3. That the existing driveway on Parcel 1 be removed. 4. That the floor of the house on parcel 2 be constructed a minimum of 12 inches above the finish grade to provide for proper drainage. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Wilt. Noes: Crabtree. Absent: None. Advisor Flanery arrived at 8 :40 o'clock p.m. NEW BUSINESS 5. SETBACK MODIFICATION REQUEST - 9027 and 9129 EAST STEELE STREET PC - 5/6/63 Secretary Wroe explained that this item of business is a request for a setback modification from 20 feet to a 5 foot setback on the parking lots at 9027 and 9129 East Steele Street which was presented and approved with conditions under Zone Exception Case No. 16. Attorney Boyko explained that the Planning Commission could not modify any conditions of approval of a Zone Exception without holding another public hearing. The applicant could appeal to the City Council for relief on any or all conditions placed on this exception Ernie Blanchard, owner, 9129 East Steele Street stated that the setback modification would not have too much bearing on his property, however, it is affecting 3 parking spaces. Berk Kellogg, representing 9027 East Steele Street, stated that a 5 foot setback would create 4 more parking spaces and also eliminate the maintenance and upkeep of a 20 foot setback. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Kunz, that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that in the event of an appeal from the applicants.of Zone Exception Case No, 16 that the requested setback modification from 16 feet to 5 feet be granted and that sidewalks be required on Steele Street. Attorney Boyko explained that the City Council would have the following courses of action to take in the event of an appeal. 1. To affirm the Planning Commission's action. 2. Require a transcript or recording of the testimony and all other evidence upon which the Commission made its decision.Upon receipt of such evidence the Council shall take such action as, in its opinion, is indicated by such evidence. 3. Refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. 4. Set the matter for hearing. At such hearing the City Council shall hear and decide the matter de novo as if no.other hearing had been held. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares,j aylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Lloyd Walters, 4211 No. Rio Hondo Avenue, stated that Frank DiNoto would be present a ,little later in regard to Agenda Item No. 10. Chairman Wilt declared a recess at 9 :15 o'clock P.M. Meeting reconvened at 9:30 o'clock p.m. LEGISLATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 6. General Plan - Council Action - Deletion of Proposed Extension of Steele Street - Gernert Street to Muscatel. Secretary Wroe explained that the City Council had taken action to delete this extension from the General Plan and by State Law it is referred back to the Planning Commission for a report to the City Council. Commissioner McCaffree stated this extension is necessary for a better flow of traffic especially with the development of the Regional Library, and the possible location of a Civic Center - 2 - PC - 5/6/63 * • and Post Office in this area. He would like the City Council to reconsider the purchase of this property for the extension of Steele'Street. The Steele Street extension should be re- tained in the General Plan. Commissioner Crabtree would like more information regarding the cost of this extension. Commissioner Kunz stated this is a very important location and feels this extension is a necessity to handle the flow of traffic which will be created by the developments on Muscatel Avenue. Chairman Wilt felt that this extension would help to develop the area business -wide on Valley Boulevard. Councilman Andersen explained the Council's action on this matter. Secretary Wroe read the motion and vote of the April 9, 1963 Council Meeting concerning this extension. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Wilt that a report be prepared by a Committee and referred to the City Council that the action of the Planning Commission is to retain in the General Plan the extension of Steele Street between Gernert and Muscatel. Also a copy of this report to be sent to the Commissioners prior to the next City Council meeting. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: Buchanan. Absent: None. Chairman Wilt appointed Commissioner McCaffree as Chairman and Commissioner Crabtree to serve on this Committee to prepare a report for the Council on the retention of the Steele Street extension. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections agenda Item No. 10 would be considered at this time. There were no object- ions and it was so ordered. 7. AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 -- GENERAL PLAN - COUNCIL ACTION - BENTEL STREET EXTENSION - IVAR TO MUSCATEL. Secretary Wroe read a memo in full from the City Council re- garding the Bentel Street extension. Discussion was held concerning the Public Hearings and final decisions regarding the adoption of the General Plan. Frank DiNoto, representing the owners of a large portion of property involved in the Bentel Street extension, stated that they would not care for a public thoroughfare through this property. In the event of development a zone change would be necessary and they would definitely provide private ingress and egress. Advisor Flanery explained that ingress and egress lines are not shown on General Plans and that the Planning Commission would have full control in the event of a Zone Change Request. (MO) After further discussion it was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree, to report to the City Council that the Planning Commission concurs with the action of the City Council and recommends the deletion of the Bentel Avenue extension from the General Plan with the reservation that future development of the property provides for the free flow of traffic between Ivar Avenue and Muscatel Avenue: - 3 - PC - 5/6/63 0 4 (RC) Roll Call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. 8. AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 - CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE WITH RESPECT TO "C" ZONE REQUIREMENTS. Advisor Flanery presented a report regarding this proposed ordinance. Discussion was held concerning the proposed ordinance and the question arose as to the size of a City block. Attorney Boyko stated that the Planning Commission would have approval control and felt that "a City block" would be better than stating "specific footage" for accessibilety. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Casares, that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the adoption of this proposed ordinance - Title as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE TEMPORARY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE WITH RESPECT TO C -1, C -2, C -3, AND C -4 REGULATIONS AND AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE." (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Commissioner Buchanan abstained from voting. 9. AGENDA ITEM NO. o - REPORT - ADVISOR FLANERY - USES IN VACANT "C" ZONED STRUCTURES Advisor Flanery reviewed this report which had been presented to the Commissioners at a past meeting. He suggested that the Commissioners study this list for possible additions, etc. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections Commissioners Kunz, Buchanan and Taylor could meet with Advisor Flanery to study this list and report back to the Planning Commission at the next meeting. There were no objections and it was so ordered. 10. AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 - CITIZEN INQUIRY - SPLIT ZONES. Secretary Wroe reported that the office has regarding split zones (front of property in in another or one side of a property in one side in another zone). At the present time would be the only way to correct this probl quite expensive to the property owner. received inquiries one zone and rear zone and the other a zone exception am, however it becomes Discussion was held in regard to the proposed zoning ordinance and if this problem could be cleared up when it is adopted. Property owners on one block could join together and file for a zone change. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections the staff could prepare a list or map of these locations where split zones exist and report back at the next meeting. There were no objections and it was so ordered. Loren Rightmeier, 8724 East Valley Blvd., stated that he thought his property has a split zone by about 15 feet. 11. AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 - 1963 -64 BUDGET - PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS. Chairman Wilt stated that he had prepared a preliminary budget for the Planning Commission. - 4 - PC - 5/6/63 • Discussion was held concerning this preliminary report and copies will be made and forwarded to the Commissioners. 12. COMMUNICATIONS: None 13. MATTERS FROM COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF: A. West San Gabriel Valley Planning-Counci1: The next meeting will be at Woody & Eddys, on May 12, 1963, at 12 Noon, topic to be "Move Ins ". Chairman Wilt stated this should be a very interesting meeting. (MO) Chairman Wilt declared the meeting adjourned at 12 :01 o'clock a.m. Next regular meeting will be Monday, May 20, 1963, at 7 :30 o'clock p.m. CHAIRMAN S CR AR - 5 -