Loading...
PC - Minutes - 09-17-630 0 CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD,,CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of September 17, 1963 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Blvd. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt at 7:42 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Recording Secretary Phillips. 2. Present: Commissioners: Casares,.Taylor, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Absent: Commissioner: Kunz. Ex officio: Farrell, Flanery, Hassenplug, Phillips. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 3, 1963 Commissioner McCaffree stated on page 6, last sentence should be deleted, r Chairman Wilt stated that on delete the last sentence. Commissioner Crabtree stated line add "the west side" and Commissioner Buchanan stated motion, second line add mai item 4, first paragraph, page 2, end of first 'north" end of Fendyke. page 2, item 1 of first "and" easement agreement. page 1, that on at the that on itenance Commissioner Kunz arrived at 7:50 o'clock p.m. (MO) It was moved by Crabtree, second by Casares, and unanimously carried that the minutes of September 3, 1963, be approved as corrected.. ADMINISTRATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 4. REQUEST FOR SIDEWALK VARIANCE - 9248 EAST MARSHALL STREET PLOT PLAN NO. 90. City Administrator Farrell read this request from Mrs. Lara and Mrs. Contri in full and explained that a deposit had been made to the City to cover the cost of sidewalk instal- lation in order to permit occupancy. Chairman Wilt explained that sidewalks are very necessary and that these improvements do progress on the block in due time. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Taylor, and unanimously carried that the request for a sidewalk variance at 9248 East Marshall Street - Plot Plan No. 90 - be denied and that said sidewalks shall be installed in compliance with the Municipal Code. Attorney Hassenplug explained that the applicant has the right to appeal to the City Council within fifteen (15) days after written notice of this action. NEW BUSINESS 5. None PC 9/17/63 0 LEG I SLAT 1 i'r=:. OLD 3 1 ^rc 6. SUBDIVISION ORD i NANCE - REPORT OF STUDY City ,4'::mil;istraCOr F rrell st--ted that the report has not been completed es staff has had a problem obtaining enough copies of the Ordin nco to s1.Lmit to the various departm Chairmt:n ! :'.xplained thiat. I,a had discussed this matter with Mr. i`iFns i' ;aci r!r, F a relI e_:?d that the County is in the proces=s r nrc-�)drirq a ih<':1 ord n 3ace„ Mr. Mansur was of the opinlC:; t hF,'. his ordEna::lC ^. f;ad 1 nC'V! County ordinance would be CU i tC S i ni! ! 1f. i "e apnee ?'S to bC 110 i r•.M , i ate urgency to adept i o nor! s iv' s i ca ord i na nce and if the County adepts - ':h-i nc.i ordln, :arc::: the Plzr Corr;nissicn could study and b•., re•fcrence. This prcced- M ,- a n ... :.• ' S -VO, , r c no Ure OF �... _.iC:? l ^: C?LiPd ,c.... �, %t1.' Clt� t:iUitl'r a lar�� , g e,�..+ publ i° catici': (MO) it 4' -1.5 moV : ^.j c,PGOi: c; btree that the Plan - n i ng romiii s °, ^. rE :COC,t; "f. :i1C;i t^ Lhc ' v Cot.lnc i 1 that no action be ts�..n Ot 'Ili'; t:i•Tir -n . :,1C SU div siOn Ordinance a5 pre - pared by 1c CC = ..:.4;'._ t.':i! t.'':5L t -e City of Rosemead r' eont i n:Jc tc U1 �. 1 1 "?:e �.' :i -.O1'1 'i. i `� )/ .. : :' : V On Cr'd i nance. (RC) Rol i c-:0 i v3z':.. 7;-a ,as f of loop_ Ayes: _acres, '; ". :rylo: !'.ai'. - _ ? la:, :r, !vcr..affree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: Nona. Absent: P::.nc. City Acimi ist. "a•tn :" rrt:i i st<-a -d ther ^. were several items of busi r.css i:iv;t d at id n--pear on ­he. a •rnda anal should be A. Ill . i n:C P :..PO.� : : ' 7 l.J11 tIa L�'.'U :.c•�L' City ,Gk:: i i . °l t: l "a r S'•' . l C'.: ;J 3 C' i lad t�l,l. t tha rounc i 1 took act i er, t:o _, c;c! t: t• ";e z ol i ii -once w-. th several minor amend - cn r' - 'd menrs, e :rr�:i ... na., be , r�. Meat _ t the Planning Commission accept Eild approve these i -.'n ^nd:,lents. (MO) it Wa s S &GCiiu b Cc ^,Sr05, that the Planning Comm i s s i ar, a,'! %C'G\'e5 tl nm rfdi? [l %s to the %'on i ng Ordinance t'C as r U '3; :eC -'J t" C:L :h i l a- f of lows: Sections 9106.6, 9106.12, 9i2i_C5E, 91,1.22, and the Certificate of Occupancy Section„ B. P!.0 P LAN P• :C„ ! _.f :r. I OUSC MC IfE -IN INSPECTION. The i^:ovc• i Committee : cortcd the inrpecticn had been made ' to be moved onto ,1 and Ye, r; r i,• - s the property A lette? is to be written to the applicant stating the • - appr_-vzl of ;:his inspcction. �.... ,t:'; Cif. �..'�'� t i C[ 3 r C. Sc pUEi_ 'r.,•,, CR 7.011E C,IAN E CASES 2 an ZC : Q'E ._n t,' :P T d Cal ! ASE ia0 City AG:hiili_trator Far;ei i t •:.plaincd the period cn the two zone'. ch. =:n cases wil 1963, and ( cto'.-_ r 16, 1 1965, e:h the Zone The Ccimmissicn should .cticn to set date. ninoty (90) day expire on October 1, Exception Case No. 118. a nc•.v PUblis Hearing (MO) After ccnsiaer ^ble discus;sicn it Was moved by Casares, second by TdyiOr, U:':, Ir9 �'JS1�' c.,r; icd i:hat Pllbl IC I1car ings on r c� Zones Chz�r i S ^S i'!c3,.. 2 Li',Q i3nd Lone Exce lase No. 18 be set. T:_._:, c;y. .'ac :rr. r 1, 19;x, rrc that the City is to b ^::?r ^ri.. expense of mailing ncticas, etc. PC 9/17/63 • 74 (Agenda Item No, 8) DATE PROPOSED ZONING MAP - SET PUBLIC HEARING City Administrator Farrell explained the proposed zoning map has been prepared to coincide with the new zoning ordinance and that there had been very minor changes made. The largest change made is the A -1 zone to R -I zone which would be a very logical change as most of the A -1 zones are developed resi- dentially. Chairman Wilt declared a recess at 9:37 o'clock p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:55 o'clock p.m. City Administrator Farrell stated that any changes the Commis= sion would like to make should be made at this time, then a new map will be prepared for the Public Hearing. PERSONS IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO DISCUSS THE LOT SPLIT MORATORIUM Chairman Wilt stated there was a problem regarding lot splits which were in the City Hall at the time the action was taken to hold all future plot plans for a ninety (90) day period. City Administrator Farrell read a communication from Mr. L.B. Jennings, 8843 and 8845 East Marshall Street and Sacheli Com- pany, developers for Mr. Jennings regarding his plot plan which was on file in the City Hall, but not heard before the Commission as yet. (MO) It was roved by McCaffree, second by Kunz, that Mr. Jennings' Marshall Street Plot Plan be placed on the agenda of the next regular meeting. Commissioner Crabtree stated he would like the motion to in- clude all plot plans that were in the City Hall prior to September 3, 1963. (RC) After lengthy discussion and the agreement of maker of motion and second to include the above addition to the motion, the roll call was as follows: Ayes: Kunz, McCaffree, Crabtree. Noes: Casares, Taylor, Buchanan, Wilt. Absent: None. Commissioner Casares commented that this ninety day period may be creating a hardship on certain plot plans. Further discussion was held in regard to this problem. (MO) It was moved by Casares that lot splits be accepted for con- sideration by the City Administrator to be placed on the agenda starting October 29, 1963. Motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Taylor suggested the Planning Commission return to the business on the agenda at this time. Discussion and individual polls were taken regarding the pro- posed zoning map to determine if any changes on the map were desired by the Commissioners. The following changes were to be made on the final map which is to be used at the Public Hearing. 1. All A -1 zones to be changed to R -1 zones. 2. That all P zones to remain as is. 3. That all Flood Control Washes to be in the R -1 zone. 4. That the C -3 zone be deleted on the northeast corner of Rosemead Blvd, and Mission Drive (Rosemead High School property). - 3 - PC 9/17/63 5. That the apartment development west side of Rosemead Blvd, be Grand Ave, be R -3 zone instead 6. That the apartment development north side of Glendon Way east zone instead of C••I zone. 7. That all C -2 zoned property be ordinance does not create much 0 , t , , wnsaker & Sons on the tween Mission Drive and of C -3. (J.A. Freemen) on the of Rosemead Blvd, be R -3 shown as C-1, as the n--v! change in use.' (MO) It was moved by McCaffrce, second by Wilt and unanimously carried that the first public hearing on the zoning map be set for Tuesday, OctoL-.er 1, 1963, 8:00 o'clock p.m. at Muscatel School. The second hearing to be set for Wednesday. October 9, 1963, same time and place, (MO) It was moved by Wilt, second by Casares, and unanimously carried that the alley report and tour should be rescheduled from October 1 to October 15, 1963, at 6:30 o'clock p.m. 8. (Agenda Item No. 7) PROPOSED L0 SP! i T ORD , 1 4A.''CE Chairman Wilt explained the proposed lot split ordinance is in the proposed Subdivision Ordinance, pages 4 2 - 49. Discus- sion was held and the follo: ding charges were suggested. 9212 - 4th line add of a size, shape, "anal location ". 9212.07 - 3rd line change fifty to "ten ". 9212.07 -G - add "or completely removed". 9212.07 -K - last I i ne strike "if any ". 9212.11 - City Attorney to reword to include a sixty (60) day from filing date instead of "first convenient date" . 9212.12 -A - last line a ^d "or where adjacent land is available ". 9212.14 - City Attorney to check this section. 9212.15 - City staff to r- this section. 9212.16 - 6th line strike "a reproducible paint and ". 9212.18 - This section should include the Modification Committee. (MO) It was moved by Kunz that the City of Roscmoad accept no more lot splits for approval unless street frontage can be provided. Motion died for lack of a second, Chairman Wilt stated that there is an urgency on this proposed ordinance and that more time is needed to study same. Perhaps a special meeting should be held, (MO) It was moved by Kunz, second by Wilt, and unanimously carried that the meeting adjourn to Wednesday, October 25th, 1963, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. Meeting adjourned at 12:20 o'clock a.m. HA I RMAN SECRETARY .. 4 _.