Loading...
PC - Minutes - 10-15-630 CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of October 15, 1963 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt at 7 :37 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Wilt. 2. Present: Commissioners: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Absent: Commissioners: None. Ex officio: Cushman, Hassenplug, Wroe, Phillips. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 30, 1963 Commissioner Buchanan stated that the corrections made to the September 17 and 25th minutes should have included the date of the minutes. (MO) It was moved by Wilt, second by Casares, and unanimously carried that the minutes of September 30, 1963 be approved as corrected. Chairman Wilt stated that the minutes of October 1, 1963, page 2, third paragraph, s'. 18 'read as folloe•rs: "Chairman Wilt explained that the Commission was not recommending any zone changes such as this. They feel the property owners should be notified individually on such proposed zone changes." Reference point: Tape footage position 61 on P.C. meeting tape 15 October 1963. (MO) It was moved by Wilt, second by Buchanan, and unanimously carried that the minutes of October 1, 1963, be approved as corrected. 4. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN Chairman Wilt explained that it was time to elect a new chairman and vice- chairman and turned the chair over to Secretary Wroe. Secretary Wroe assumed the chair and declared that nominations were open for Chairman of the Planning Commission. Commissioner McCaffree nominated Joseph C. Wilt to serve as Chairman for another year as he has done so well in the past. (MO) it was moved by Casares, second by Taylor and unanimously carried that nominations for Chairman be closed. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree that the election of Joseph C. Wilt for Chairman be unanimous. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree. Noes: None. Absent: None. 5. ELECTION OF VICE - CHAIRMAN Chairman Wilt assumed the chair, thanked the Commission for the confidence they have placed in him and declared that nominations were open for Vice- Chairman. Commissioner Kunz nominated Commissioner McCaffree. Commissioner Buchanan nominated Commissioner Taylor. r. PC 10 -15 -63 Commissioner Taylor Commission longer to decline. stated that he would like to serve on the acquire more experience, therefore he would Commissioner Casares nominated Commissioner Buchanan. Commissioner Buchanan stated that he would decline as he will not be on the Commission long enough to assume this position. Chairman Wilt nominated Commissioner Crabtree. (MO) It was moved by Taylor, second by Crabtree and unanimously carried that nominations for Vice - Chairman be closed. Chairman Wilt stated that election would be by ballot. Secretary Wroe and Attorney Hassenplug tallied the ballots as follows: Five in favor of Commissioner Crabtree. Two in favor of Commissioner McCaffree. Commissioner Crabtree will serve as Vice- Chairman for one year. ELECTION OF A SECRETARY Chairman Wilt stated that a Secretary for the Planning Commission should be elected at this time. Commissioner Casares nominated Duane Wroe. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree and unanimously carried that nominations for Secretary be closed. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Taylor, and unanimously carried that Duane Wroe serve as Secretary to the Planning Com- mission for one year. ADMINISTRATIVE OLD BUSINESS 6. None. NEW BUSINESS 7. TR 29002 Advisor Cushman explained that this is a subdivision creating 13 lots and extending the existing Bartlett Avenue southerly to join at Mission Drive which will be a 40 foot wide street. However, the Design requirement No. 2 "Provide a minimum 200 foot center line radius with an arc length of not less than 100 feet at the curve in Bartlett Avenue." could create some design problems. Kenneth Bonne]], 2710 Parkway Drive, E1 Monte, Planning Consultant for the developer stated that the properties on Mission Drive are not a part of the subdivision, however 60 feet of right -of -way has been purchased to provide for the street and parkway. The existing house on the west corner would not have the required side yard setback if requirement No. 2 is met. The street as proposed would need to be shifted easterly to allow a proper setback and this would create an extra curve in the proposed street. Considerable discussion was held regarding the center line radius and arc length proposed on Bartlett Avenue. Also the traffi- problems which could result from this opening of Bartlett Avenue. - 2 - 0 PC 10 -15 -63 0 Mr. Knight, Waade Realty, pointed out that this rule of radius is fairly new and if the street had to be shifted easterly it would change the square footage on the lots, possibly treating a sale problem. Further discussion was held by the Commissioners and diagrams were drawn on the chalkboard by Kenneth Bonnell to show the center line radius with an arc length in relation.to the house on the west corner. Also the Commission felt there should be at least a 5 foot side yard setback on this house; (MO) it Was moved by McCaffree, second by Taylor, that the setback requirements on the northwest corner of Mission Drive and Bartlett Avenue must be 5 feet from the property line and that the tentative map be referred to the City Engineer, to obtdih approval of the realignment on Baet,tett'Avenue pertaining to Condition No. 2 of design. That TR 29002 be recommended to the City Council for approval. (RC) Roll call vote was as follow§: Ayes; Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Chairman Wilt declared a eecess at 9:20 o'clock p:m, Meeting reconvened at 9:38 o'clock p:m. 8. PLOT PLAN NO. 140 - FRONT YARb SETBACK MODIFICATION Secretary Wroe explained this was a request to make an addition to the front of the house which would extend into the front yard setback. Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plot plan and pointed out that this property is located on the end of the block where Driggs and Heglis meet. The Commission held discussion regarding the location and adjacent properties on both sides of the street. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Crabtree that Plot Plan No.. 140, request for front yard setback, be denied. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Attorney Hassenplug explained that the applicant has the right to appeal this decision to the City Council within fifteen (15) days from receipt of written notice. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections Agenda Item No. 13 would be considered now. There were no objections and it was so ordered. 9. COMMUNICATIONS (Agenda Item No. 13) A. TED DANVILLE, 8547 E. VALLEY BOULEVARD Secretary Wroe read the communication from Mr.. Danville requesting that curb, gutters and sidewalk requirements on Walnut Grove be waived and that he will dedicate the required right -of -way for street widening. Mr. Danville, Village Fire Service, stated that he is planning on making some building improvements on his business and that curb, gutter and sidewalks would be a requirement. However, since Walnut Grove is planned for widening and no engineering has been prepared as yet it would not be feasible to install curb and gutter at this time. - 3 - 0 PC 10 -13 -63 The Commission held discussion regarding the corner of Walnut Grove and Valley, the existing catch basin and that these improvements could hardly be made at this time. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Kunz that the request made by Ted Danville to waive the curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements on the west side of Walnut Grove at Valley Boulevard be approved and that the required dedication of right -of -way to widen Walnut Grove be accepted. Further discussion was held as to whether the City or property owner will install sidewalks at the time this section of Walnut Grove is improved. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree. Noes: Crabtree, Wilt. Absent: None. B. PROPERTY OWNERS WEST OF WELLS SCHOOL. Secretary Wroe read the communication from three property owners informing the City that they planned on filling, tamping and grading the land at the rear of their properties (west of Wells School, south of Wells and east of the Rubio Wash). Monty Clark, 8428 East Wells Street, spoke for himself and the other two property owners regarding this proposed work and develop- ment. However, they were concerned about the City's plans for this area as it is shown in the General Plan as a park or school extension. Attorney Hassenplug explained there is nothing the Commission would need to do at this time and that the property owners should possibly check with the school board to obtain an opinion. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections the Attorney's recommendations would be accepted. There were no objections and it was so ordered. LEGISLATIVE OLD BUSINESS -10. ALLEY REPORT (Agenda Item No. 9) Secretary Wroe stated that this report was referred by the City Council to the Planning Commission for study and recommendations. A tour of the various alleys was held prior to this meeting. Commissioner Casares stated that the Traffic and Safety Commission recommendations should be considered as follows: No. 2 - North of Valley from Rio Hondo to eastern terminus - No improvements. No. 8 - North of Garvey Avenue from Rosemead Place west to terminus should be improved. No. 9 - North of Garvey Avenue from Rosemead Place to Sullivan Avenue - should be improved. No. 13- West of Rosemead Boulevard from Marshall Street to Glendon Way. Discussion was held as to the possibility of widening and improving this alley or creating a street at this location. because the traffic is increasing. This should be shown on a precise plan and engineering done if it is to be made a street in the future.. - 4 - PC 10 -13 -63 0 Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections Alley No. 13 would be on the next agenda, November 5, 1963. There were no objections and it was so ordered. The following numbered alleys: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 14 were discussed and decided no attention was needed at this time. However, alley Number 10 should have a report prepared regarding flood control problems at this alley. (MO) It was moved by Kunz, second by Casares, and unanimously carried that the alley report be accepted by the Planning Commission and recommended to the City Council that priority for improvements be given to Alleys 8 and 9, and that Alley No. 10 have a concrete apron. 11. DRAFT OF LOT SPLIT ORDINANCE Attorney Hassenplug presented the draft of the lot split ordinance and stated the Commissioners would probably want to study the completed ordinance before taking action. Discussion was held as to whether the trust section should be in the subdivision ordinance, lot split ordinance or a separate ord- inance. Attorney Hassenplug stated he would prepare an ordinance to cover the trust section in regard to lot splits and subdivisions. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections the lot split ordinance would be on the agenda for completion November 5, 1963. 12. STANDARD REQUIREMENT REVISION (Agenda Item No. 10) Chairman Wilt read the standard requirements with revisions as prepared at a meeting with Secretary Wroe and C.A. Farrell. Discussion was held on some of the items and the Attorney is to reword Condition No. 17. A completed draft is to be prepared and distributed in time to be studied and completed at the meeting of November 5, 1963. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree and unanimously carried that the meeting adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 11:55 o'clock p.m. Next regular meeting to be November 5, 1963. CHAIRMAN SECRETARY - 5 -