Loading...
PC - Minutes - 03-03-640 CITY OF ROSEMEAD, PLANNING Minutes of ROSEMEAD CALIFORNIA COMMISSION March 3, 1964 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt at 7 :42 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Recording Secretary Phillips. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners: Casares, Taylor, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Absent: Commissioner Kunz. Ex officio: Cushman, Hassenplug, Phillips, Wroe. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - February 11, 1964 (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Buchanan, and unanimously carried that the minutes of February 11, 1964 be approved as printed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - February 18, 1964 Commissioner Buchanan stated on page 2, paragraph 2, fourth line, change southwest to "southeast" and fifth line change southeast to "southwest ". Attorney Hassenplug stated on page 2, item 7, second line after "construction" insert "and final approval ". (MO) It was moved by Taylor, second by Casares, and unanimously carried that the minutes of February 18, 1964, be approved as corrected. Commissioner Kunz arrived at 7 :50 o'clock p.m. ADMINISTRATIVE OLD BUSINESS 4. None NEW BUSINESS 5. PLOT PLAN NO. 145 - RAYMOND HOLMES - 4215 N. MUSCATEL AVENUE Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan. This is a revision of plot plan No. 86, and all legal requirements have been met concerning the one year time limit. Raymond Holmes, owner, 4215 N. Muscatel Avenue, explained the details regarding his proposed development. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree that Plot Plan No. 145 be approved subject to the Planning Commission Standard Requirements that apply and that the five final maps show the elevations to provide proper drainage to the street. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan,. McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. PC 3/3/64 ' 0 6. PLOT PLAN NO. 151 - WILLIAM KNIGHT - 8718 EAST GRAND AVENUE STRECKER ASSOCIATES Advisor Cushman presented the factual data and explained that the drainage easement would need to be 5 feet instead of the 1 foot shown on the plan. Mr. William Knight, owner, stated that he would be able to obtain the 5 foot easement and that he is trying to purchase the property to the east. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Buchanan, that Plot Plan No. 151 be approved subject to the applicable Planning Commission's Standard Requirements and that the driveway approaches be curved. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None 7. PLOT PLAN NO. 152 - WILL C LORETTA ODEN (owners) 3802 N. RIO HONDO AVENUE - BILL /EARL CARLISLE (Developer) Advisor Cushman presented the factual data and stated that there is no proposed development, this is for the purpose of selling these parcels independent of one another. Mr. Carlisle representing the owners, stated that there are separate sewer and gas lines, however the water is on one meter. Considerable discussion was held as to the possibility of bringing these properties up to code, even if there is no construction planned they will still need garaging and off street parking. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Crabtree, that Plot Plan No.152 be approved subject to the applicable Standard Requirements, and that the garage on Parcel A be moved back 25' or provide adequate off street parking spaces. Also curbs, gutters and sidewalks to be installed. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. 8. PLOT PLAN NO. 153 - CHARLES WHITLOCK - 9248 E. PITKIN STREET CHARLES J. SACHEL (Applicant) Advisor Cushman presented the factual data pertaining to this plan and explain ed that the drainage plans and elevations should be shown on the plot plan. Jay Stringham, representing the owner, stated that they would need to obtain a drainage easement from the rear property to provide proper drainage. Considerable discussion was held regarding the drainage prob- lem and the inadequacy of water service which prevails in this area. The water sufficiency report was not prepared as yet and there.are adjacent properties which will eventually become lot splits. - 2 - PC 3/3/64 0 0 Jay Stringham stated he would withdraw his plot plan without prejudice and try to join the adjacent property with this plan, (MO) It was moved by Casares, Second by Taylor, that Plot Plan No, 153 be withdrawn without prejudice upon applicants request. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Chairman Wilt declared a recess at 9:05 o'clock p.m. Meeting reconvened at 9:20 o'clock p.m. 9. PLOT PLAN NO. 154 - SANTINA CORDASCO (Owner & applicant) 8713 East Steele Street Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan. Plot Plans Nos. 4 and 80 were prior plans on the same property. This property faces on Valley Blvd. and also on Steele Street. It is C -3 zone on Valley Blvd, for 180' southerly then it is R -1 for 101' to Steele Street. Additional data should be obtained to determine construc- tion dates, lot sizes, etc. to consider this request properly. (MO) It was moved by Kunz, second by Crabtree, that Plot Plan No. 154 be held over until April 7, 1964, pending further information regarding this plan. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Chairman Wilt requested that Vice - chairman Crabtree assume the chair for the remainder of the meeting. 10. PLOT PLAN NO. 155 - HENRY G. ARKEBAUR (Owner) - 3210 N. ROSEMEAD PLACE - M.E. CARTER (Applicant) Advisor Chusman presented the factual data regarding this plan and explained that Plot Plan No, 156 is adjacent at the rear of Plot Plan No. 155 with only a 40' offset, The drain- age plans would need to be submitted to the City Engineer for approval, Vice - chairman Crabtree suggested that Plot Plan No. 156 be discussed jointly with the possibility of creating a sub- division. There were no objections and it was so ordered. 11. PLOT PLAN NO. 156 - LOUIS A. & RUTH CARMICHAEL (Owners) - 3229 N. AVE. - LUN DEE INVEST- MENT COMPANY (Applicant) Chuck Guida, representing Marvin Carter, stated this would not be economically feasible to join these properties. Forrest Lundstrom, applicant, explained that they were not interested in developing the north lot at this time and agreed that financially this would be impossible. Mrs. Carmichael, owner, explained there is illness in the family and they would like to sell immediately. - 3 - PC 3/3/64 • • Considerable discussion was held regarding the pros and cons of joining these plot plans. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Crabtree, that Plot Plan No. 155 be disapproved according to Item 15 of the Standard Requirements. After further discussion Casares withdrew his motion with agreement of second. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Taylor, that Plot Plan No. 155 be taken under submission until the next meeting to allow the owner an opportunity to appear and withdraw his plot plan without prejudice. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Owner Carmichael and applicant Lundstrom of Plot Plan No. 156 both agreed they did not wish to withdraw, they wanted action taken on their plot plan at this time. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Kunz, that Plot Plan No. 156 be denied according to Item 15 of the Standard Requirements. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Attorney Hassenplug advised the applicant that they have the right to appeal this decision to the City Council within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written notice. LEGISLATIVE OLD BUSINESS 12. ZONING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Kunz, and carried that Agenda Item No. 12 not be considered at this time. NEW BUSINESS 13. RESET APRIL 21st MEETING DATE - DUE TO CITY ELECTION. Secretary Wroe explained it will be impossible to conduct a meeting the evening of April 21, as it will be a City Council meeting. After discussion it was agreed to adjourn the April 21st meeting for lack of a quorum to the next regular meeting which will be May 5, 1964. 14. COMMUNICATIONS A. WEST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY PLANNING COUNCIL Secretary Wroe stated the next meeting will be Friday, March 13, 1964, 12 noon at the Derby Restaurant. Attorney Hassenplug was excused at 11 :02 o'clock p.m. - 4 - PC 3/3/64 • 0 B. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PLANNING CONGRESS - Secretary Wroe stated that the next dinner meeting will be Thursday, March 12, 1964, at the Montebello Country Club, the subject will be "Advanced Planning on Water Supply'. Vice- chairman Crabtree declared the meeting adjourned at 11:12 o'clock p.m. Next regular meeting will be Tuesday, March 17, 1964, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. CHAIRMAN S CRETA Y - 5 -