Loading...
PC - Minutes - 05-05-64r 0 CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of May 5,1964 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt at 7:39 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Wilt. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners: Casares,Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Absent: Commissioners: None. Ex officio: Cushman, Hassenplug, Wroe, Armstrong, Phillips. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 21, 1964 Commissioner Casares stated that on page 3, first motion, third line change the "R-3" to "R -4". Commissioner Buchanan stated that on page 2, B. Sign Re- quirements - R -1 - Delete 4 square feet. (MO) It was moved by Buchanan, second by Casares, and unanimously carried that the minutes of April 21, 1964, be approved as corrected. 4. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. None. ADMINISTRATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 5. PLOT PLAN NO. 78 - MALOOF et.al. - 3714 NORTH MUSCATEL AVENUE, Secretary Wroe reviewed the previous action taken concerning the conditions and lack of compliance regarding this Plot Plan. (MO) After general discussion it was moved by Crabtree, second by Casares, that Plot Plan No. 78 be granted a ninety (90) day extension (August 4, 1964) in order to comply with the original conditions of approval. In the event of non - compliance at the end of the ninety day (90) day period this Plot Plan shall be automatically sent to the District Attorney's office for proper action. (RC) Roll call on the motion was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree. Absent:.None. 6. TR 29002 - BARTLETT STREET REDESIGN Advisor Cushman presented a staff analysis of this subdivision Kenneth Bonne]] spoke representing the developer. Alex Eleff, 8655 East Mission Drive, spoke in accord with this redesign. (MO) It was moved by Kunz, second by Taylor, that the modified design of roadway for TR 29002 be recommended to the City Council for approval. PC 5/5/64 0 (RC) Roll call on the motion was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. 7. PLOT PLAN NO. 87 (Revised) - M. MONTGOMERY & D.R. JARRETT (Owners) - CAPRI HOMES, INC. (Applicant) - 9534 E. RALPH STREET Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan. This plan was originally submitted January 12, 1962, however, a letter requesting withdrawal was received in February, 1962, therefore no action was taken by the Planning Commission. General discussion was held regarding the two driveways, turn around area, etc. Mr. Jarrett, owner, stated he would withdraw this plan and resubmit at a later date. (MO) It was moved by Kunz, second by Casares, that Plot Plan No. 87 (Revised) be withdrawn without prejudice. (RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. 8. PLOT PLAN NO. 157 (Revised) - GILBERT KEAS (Owner) - GEORGE DUFF FINLEY (Applicant) - 9306 E. GUESS STREET Advisor Cushman presented the factual data and .stated that this plan was withdrawn at the April 7th, 1964, meeting. Mr. Finley, applicant, stated that the front house would be redecorated and cleaned -up to be an asset to the neighborhood. (MO) It was moved by Taylor, second by Kunz, that Plot Plan No. 157 (Revised) be approved subject to the Standard Require- ments that apply. (RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. Chairman Wilt declared a recess at 8:55 o'clock p.m. Meeting reconvened at 9:07 o'clock p.m. NEW BUSINESS 9. PLOT PLAN NO. 162 - 'N.J. KNIGHT (Owner & Applicant) 9215 EAST GLENDON MAY Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan. Secretary Wroe stated that this proposed development would tend to establish a precedent or pattern in conflict with the extension of Hart Street and proposed Loftus Drive which are presently under study as additions to the City's General Plan. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Kunz, that Plot Plan No. 162 be denied as this plan would be in conflict with the General Plan. - 2 - PC 5/5/64 0 0 (AMO) Commissioner Crabtree offered an amendment to the motion that would include denial based on Condition No. 15 of the Standard Requirements also. Commissioners Casares and Kunz agreed to this amendment. W.J. Knight, owner and applicant, stated he would like to withdraw this plan and try to work out a better plan to include the street extensions. Commissioner Casares withdrew his motion with agreement of second. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree, and unanimously carried, that Plot Plan No. 162 be withdrawn without prejudice. 10. PLOT PLAN NO. 166 - EMMA D. FISH (Owner) - CERTIFIED CONSTRUC- TION COMPANY (Applicant) - 3867 NORTH RIO HONDO AVENUE Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan. Commissioner Casares stated that this plan should be re- drawn to include sewer & utility lines and that the existing house should be brought up to safety standards. Considerable discussion was held as to the historical value of the existing house and that the proposed carport should not be on the property line. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Wilt, that the applicant be required to make a revision of Plot Plan No. 166 and sub- mit it at the second regular meeting (June 2, 1964 - Election Day). Also, the Chairman is to appoint a Committee of three to investigate this property and report back to the Commis- sion at the same meeting. (RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: None. LEGISLATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 11. ZONING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS (a) Sign Requirements Commissioner Casares stated that the Sign Committee met and the following is a copy of their recommendations: "I. In C -3 - C -M and M Zones A. One sign, unlimited footage, provided that it be limited to the name of the owner and shall contain no other form of advertising. Additional signs shall be permitted under the following conditions and limitations. 1. As otherwise provided in the ordinance. 2. By conditional use permit. 3. Front footage up to 50 ft, one sign limited to the principle product or service manufactured or sold on the premises and not to exceed 42 sq.'. 4. For each additional 50 ft. of front footage one sign under the above limitations. 5. Each side of a double faced sign shall be consid- ered as contributing to the total permitted sign area. - 3 - PC 5/5/64 0 0 6. Any sign or combination of signs exceeding 42 sq. ft. must have Planning Commission approval on size, design, contents, and location on Premises." Attorney Hassenplug stated that the ordinance needs a defini- tion of a sign, and that he would work on this. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree, and unanimously carried that the report from the Sign Committee be referred to the staff for proper wording and returned to the Plan- ning Commission. (b) Attorney Report Attorney Hassenplug stated that he would need to check back in the minutes in order to compile all the proposed changes in the zoning ordinance. These amendments to the ordinance should be ready for the June 16th meeting. NEW BUSINESS 12. None. COMMUNICATIONS 13. (a) Secretary 'sdroe announced that the next regular meeting of the Southern California Planning Congress will be Thursday, May 14, 1964, in Beverly Hills. Topic for the meeting will be "Legislative Angles in Planning" by Thomas Rees. (b) Secretary Wroe announced that the next regular meeting of the West San Gabriel Valley Planning Council will be at the Derby Restaurant, Friday noon, May £l, 1964. 14. MATTERS FROM COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF (a) Commissioner Crabtree suggested that an amendment to the zoning ordinance be made to provide for all R -1 zones to have garages instead of carports. Advisor Cushman advised that in R -1 and R -2 zones garages have 4 sides enclosed and in the R -3 zone 3 sides enclosed. Staff will prepare the necessary wording for a presentation of this proposed amendment at the next meeting. Commissioner Casares was excused at 10 :00 o'clock p.m. Advisor Cushman stated that he would be on vacation for the next two meetings, therefore, rather than have an unfamiliar staff member attend the Planning Commission meetings, Secretary 4roe will act as Advisor at the next two meetings. Chairman 'Milt declared the meeting adjourned at 10 :12 o'- clock p.m. Next regular meeting will be May 19, 1964, at 7 :30 o'clock p.m. CHAIRMAN SECRETARY