PC - Minutes - 06-16-64CITY OF ROSEMEAD •
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of June 16, 1964
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the
Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was
called to order by Chairman Wilt at 7:38 o'clock p.m.
I. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Crabtree.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners: Casares, Taylor, Buchanan, Crabtree, Wilt.
Absent: Commissioners: Kunz, McCaffree.
Ex officio: Cushman, Phillips, Wroe.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 19, 1964
Commissioner Crabtree stated that on page 1, item 6, paragraphs
3 and 4, change the word "island" to "bays ".
Commissioner Crabtree stated that on page 2, item 7, last para-
graph, second line, delete the word "directly''.
Chairman Wilt stated that on page 5, paragraph 4, that due to some
misunderstanding, he would like this paragraph deleted. Commis-
sioner Casares had no objection to this deletion.
Commissioner Kunz arrived at 7:45 o'clock p.m..
(MO) It was moved by Taylor, second by Crabtree,. and unanimously car-
ried that the minutes of May 19, 1964, be approved as corrected.
L,.. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE
COMMISSION
Don Branson, 8706 East Grand Avenue, explained that he was at the
meeting a month ago and complained about the unsightly condition
of the adjacent property, and to date nothing has been done.
Secretary Wroe stated that demolition permits have been taken out
and work will start this week. The City will have the Fire and
Health Departments check out the other problems.
The owner of 1 9261 East Pitkin Street asked why his property was
rezoned from A -1 to R -1. Chairman Wilt stated that this was done
last fall when the proper Public Hearings on the new zoning map
were held in conjunction with the adoption of the zoning ordinance.
Commissioner Taylor stated that Commissioner McCaffree would be
late and he requested that Agenda Item No. 5 be considered later
in the meeting.
Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections this would be
the order. There were no objections.
ADMINISTRATIVE:
OLD BUSINESS
5. (AGENDA ITEM NO. 6) PLOT PLAN NO. 167 - STRECKER ASSOCIATES (Appli-
cant) - K.M. BROOKS (Owner) - 9217 EAST GLENDON WAY (Site)
Secretary Wroe explained that this plan was on the last agenda, but
due to a transposition in the address it was not considered at that
time. Also, the applicant had requested that Plot Plan No. 162
(which was withdrawn at the meeting of May 5, 1964) be considered
• M
PC 6/16/64
in conjunction with Plot Plan No. 167. These plot plans are ad-
jacent to one another, therefore the proposed Hart Street e:cten-
sion could affect both plans.
Secretary Wroe further
not been engineered as
be straight, curved, e
needs to be conducted.
City needs to plan for
hall and Glendon day.
sta
yet
tc.
If
the
ted that the Wart Street extension has
and the City does not know if it will
A study of this extension defini:;ely
this extension materializes then the
development of deep lots between Mars-
Further discussion was held as to the time needed to conduct the
necessary study regarding the Hart Street extension.
Commissioner McCaffree arrived at 8:05 o'clock p.m.
(MO) It was moved by Taylor, second by Kunz, and unanimously carried
that Plot Plans 162 and 167 be postponed to no later than August
18, 1964, to allow sufficient time to complete the necessary
Hart Street extension study.
6. (AGENDA ITEM NO. 5) ZONE CHANGE CASE NO. 7 - 8639 EAST GRAND AVENUE
Secretary Wroe e::plained that this item of business was carried
over from the May 19, 1564, meeting and that the Chairman may re-
open the Public Hearing if it appears there is any new evidence
or information to be presented.
(MO) It was moved by Crabtree, second by Kunz, and unanimously carried
that the Public Hearing for Zone Change Case No. 7 be reopened to
hear any new evidence or information that might be available.
Chairman Wilt declared the Public Hearing open at 8:i7 o'clock p.m.
Secretary Wroe administered the oath to those persons wishing to
give testimony.
Secretary Wroe reviewed the factual data regarding this zone change
case.
Forrest Lundstrom, applicant, presented four pictures which were
taken of the property from various directions.
Secretary Wroe read a communication from the property owner of
0629 East Grand Avenue favoring this zone change.
Frank McDonald, broker for the sale of this property, stated that
the City is doing a very good job requiring higher standards for
industrial developments. He further presented for the record a
list of property owners who have purchased their homes within the
last two years.
The following persons spoke in opposition to this request for a
zone change:
1. C.F. Olson, 8646 East Grand Avenue;
2. John Wilson, 8626 East Grand Avenue;
3. James Burgess, 8636 East Grand Avenue;
4. Lucille E. Olson, 8646 East Grand Avenue;
5. Eugene E. Vianelli, 8640 East Grand Avenue;
6. Mary Burgess, 8636 East Grand Avenue; and
7. Frank Tsushima, 8638 EastGrand Avenue.
A petition was presented by Mr. Wilson which contained ten (10)
signatures objecting to the zone change. Seven persons of the
ten were present and objected personally.
Mrs. Jane McLarty, owner, 8639 East Grand Avenue, stated they pur-
chased this property in 1943 to live on and develop a nursery,
however, due to Mr. McLarty's health the nursery business dirt not
- 2 -
0
PC 6/16/64
tl
materialize. The City rezoned the rear portion of this lot to
M -1 about 4 years ago, thus creating the split zone on the property.
Forrest Lundstrom, e.-plained that the use has not been determined
as yet. They are planning on developing the property for a tenant
to lease, therefore, do not know the use until that time.
Chairman Wilt deciared the Public Hearing closed at 9:17 o'clock p.m.
Commissioner Casares moved to deny Zone Change Case No. 7. Notion
died for lack of a second.
Discussion was held that some type of rezoning is necessary as the
property can not be used for good R -1 or M -1 uses being split the
way it is.
(MO) It was moved by Taylor, second by McCaffree, that Zone Change Case
No. 7 be recommended to the City Council for approval that the R -1
zone be changed to M -1 -0.
Considerable discussion was held that possibly a C -M zone would be
better to create a buffer between the residential and manufacturing.
(RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows:
Ayes: Taylor, Buchanan, McCaffree.
Noes: Casares, Kunz, Crabtree, Wilt.
Absent: None.
(MO) It was moved by Crabtree, second by Casares, that Zone Change Case
No. 7 be recommended to the City Council for approval of the R -1
zone to be changed to C -M -D.
Forrest Lundstrom stated that the C -M zone would not be adequate
or acceptable.
(SMO) A substitute motion was made by Kunz, second by McCaffree, that
Zone Change Case No. 7 be recommended to the City Council for ap-
proval of the first 50 feet of R -I to be changed to C -M -D, and
the remainder of the; R -1 to be M -1 -D.
(RC) Roll call vote on the substitute motion was as follows:
Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, !efllt.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Secretary Wroe informed the owner and applicant that they have
the right to appeal this decision to the City Council.
Chairman Wilt declared a recess at x:45 o'clock p.m. Meeting re-
convened at 9:55 o'clock p.m.
7. PLOT PLAN NO. 166 - REVISED - CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION CO. (Applicant)
EMMA DEAN FISH (Owner) - 3867 NORTH RIO HONDO AVENUE (Site)
Secretary Wroe e;cplained that this plan had been before the Com-
mission on May 5, 1;64, and at that time was deferred to check on
the historical features of the property.
General discussion was held concerning the history of this property
and that the c:<isting house should be removed or brought up to code.
Emma Dean Fish, owner, and a representative of the Certified Con-
struction Company stated that financially it would not be feasible
to demolish or bring the house up to code. Emma Fish requested
that the plan be withdrawn without prejudice.
(MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Kunz, and unanimously carried
that Plot Plan No. 166 be withdrawn without prejudice.
- 3 -
M 0
PC 6/16/64
u. REQUEST FOR SIDEw%!ALK VARIAi�JCE - !)!\i'IEE HAhdL`Y - 5027 EAST ;!HITMORJ_
AVENUE
Secretary Wroc reviewed this request which was heard at the last
meeting.
The Commission discussed the location and felt that eventually
sidewalks will be constructed in the area.
(MO) It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree, that the.request for
a sidewalk variance at 5027 East 4hitmore Avenue be denied.
(RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows:
Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kurz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, i-iilt.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
NEW BUSINESS
9. PLOT PLAN NO. 160 (RCEV!SED) - T JU' ?RE (Applicant) - COHRAD, MYRTLE
RONALD & CAROL HAUE"!Y;JAAS (Owners) - L: N, RIO HONDOAVENUE (Site)
Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan as
follows:
l.,A check of the previously submitted plot plan dated March
12, 1964, has indicated that the entire ownership and, e ;Jst-
ing residence o' Conrad and Myrtle Hauerwaas has not been
shown on this revised plot plan.
In order that the entire ownership and existing residence
not be shown, one caiender year from the recorded date of
sale must have elapsed before the parcel as shown on this
revised plot plan can be considered as a separate parcel.
Therefore, the existing residence of Conrad and Myrtle Hauer -
waas not shown is considered to be one parcel and with the
four parcels shown on this revised plot plan would create a
total of five parcels and would constitute a subdivision un-
der the California State Map Act end City ordinances pertain-
ing to subdivisions.
It is recommended that conditional approval of this revised
plot plan be granted contingent upon the removal of Parcel
"C" to show two proposed residences and one existing residence
for a total of three parcels.
(MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Casares, that Plot Plan No.
160 revised be approved subject to the applicable Standard Re-
quirements and that Parcel "C" be deleted and combined with Parcel "B'�
(RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows:
Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, `•;gilt.
Hoes: None.
Absent: None.
10. PLOT PLAN N0, i7O - ':JADE SMALL (Applicant) - FRANK PETERS (Owner) -
;744 NORTH ELLIS LAi'dE (Site)
Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan.
Discussion was held that this plan should be revised to meet all
the necessary requirements.
,Jade Small, appl ";cant, stated that he would like action at this
time as he did not have time to make any revision. Fie. also did not
wish to withdraw the plan.
- 4 -
PC 6/16/64
(MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Taylor, that Plot Plan ilo.
170 be denied.
(RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows:
Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, idilt.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Secretary 'Wroe explained that the applicant had fifteen (15) days
from written notice of this action to appeal this decision to the
City Council.
Il. PLOT PLAN NO. 172 - SCHUL7 BROTHERS (Applicant) - MR. & MRS. I.
TSUCHIYA (Owner) - 4 750 NORTH MUSCATEL AVENUE (Site)
Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan
and suggested that parkway trees be planted along the Fendyke Ave.
frontage to conform with the tree planting of TR 28570.
(MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Kunz, that Plot Plan No. 172 be
approved subject to the applicable Standard Requirements and that
the parcel fronting on Fendyke Avenue shall be landscaped to con-
form with the existing parkway trees.
(RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows:
Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree,
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
12. PLOT PLAN NO. 173 - I;IEMER & ELI7ABETH REINSMA (Applicant) -
REINSMA & FARRAR (Owner) - 9752 EAST LOFTUS DRIVE (Site)
Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan and
stated that the proposed house would be a move -in.
The move -in committee reported that the house met all requirements
and would be acceptable.
Considerable discussion was held concerning adequate driveways
and garages.
(MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Kunz, that Plot Plan No. 173
be withdrawn without prejudice to be revised and resubmitted at
a later date.
Mr. Reinsma, owner, agreed to this withdrawal.
(RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows:
Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree l
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
13. PLOT PLAN NO. 17 - MEL CORNERS (Applicant & Owner) - 1 5837 NORTH
MUSCATEL AVENUE (Site)
Advisor Cushman presented the factual data regarding this plan.
(MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Taylor, that Plot Plan No. 174
be approved subject to the Standard Requirements that apply and
that the driveway across the front of Parcel A be removed and re-
placed as an individual driveway to Muscatel Avenue.
(RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows:
Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, i -dilt.
Noes: None.
Absent: None..
- 5 -
PC 6/16/64
LEGISLATIVE:
OLD BUSINESS
14, CITY ATTORNEY REPORT - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 70MING ORDINANCE
Chairman Wilt stated that the proposed amendments are not completed
as yet and that this item of business should be on the ne;:c agenda.
NEW BUSINESS
15. REQUEST FOR DEFINITION - PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR A COMMERCIAL
GARAGE
Secretary Wroe explained that this was an enlargement of a repair
garage located at 9227 East Valley Boulevard, and that there will
be 8 parking spaces under cover and 9 spaces outside. The ordi-
nance requires 12 spaces but does not state whether inside or out-
side. The Modification Committee referred this to the Planning
Commission for action.
(MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Buchanan, that the modification
of parking requirements at 9227 East Valley Boulevard be granted
and that there be a planter strip along Valley Boulevard to be
worked out by the applicant and staff.
(RC) Roll call vote on the motion was as follows:
Ayes: Taylor, Kunz, Buchanan, McCaffree, Crabtree, 'Wilt.
Noes: Casares.
Absent: None.
16, REQUEST - VACATION OF ALLEY SOUTH OF VALLEY BLVD. EAST OF �t10
HONDO AVENUE
Chairman Wilt stated that due to the late hour this item of busi-
nes would not be considered at this time.
COMMUNICATIONS
17. None
MATTERS FROM COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF
1S. ;lone
Chairman Wilt declared the meeting adjourned at 12 :13 o'clock a.m.
The next regular meeting will be Tuesday, July 7, 1964, at 7:30
o'clock p.m.
CHAIRMAN SECRETARY
0 -