PC - 2002 - 52 - Approving Zone Variance 02-320, For The Construction Of A Single-family Residence With Less Than The Required Second-Story Side Year Setback, Located At 3041 Earle AvenuePC RESOLUTION 02 -52
0
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ZONE VARIANCE 02 -320, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OFA
SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH LESS THAN THE REQUIRED
SECOND -STORY SIDE YARD SETBACK, LOCATED AT 3041 EARLE
AVENUE IN THE R -2; LIGHT MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE.
(APN: 5288- 005 -042).
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2002, Giovanni Calix, property owner, filed an application for
a zone variance for the construction of a single - family residence with less than the required second -
story side yard setback, located at 3 04 1 Earle Avenue; and
WHEREAS, 3041 Garvey Avenue is located in the R -2; Light Multi - Family Residential zone,
and
WHEREAS, Section 17.20.060 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, (RMC), requires a ten -
foot side yard setback for the second story portion of a single - family dwelling. An applicant must
obtain a variance in order to create a development that does not meet the minimum standards.
Section 17.108.020 sets criteria required for granting such a variance. Ifone ofthese criteria cannot
be met, then the variance may not be granted. These criteria require that granting such a variance will
not:
• Constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other
properties in the vicinity;
• Be materially detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the
property or improvements in such zone or vicinity;
• Adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan; and
• That because of special circumstances, the strict enforcement of the code would
deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the
vicinity under identical zone classification.
WHEREAS, Sections 17.108.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code specifies the criteria by
which a zone variance may be granted; and
WI I EREAS, on October 9, 2002, 46 notices were sent to property owners within a 300 -foot
radius from the subject property, in addition to notices posted in 12 public locations, specifying the
availability of the application, plus the date, time and location of the public hearing for Zone Variance
02 -320, and
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2002, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and
advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Zone Variance 02 -320; and
Will EREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony
presented to them in order to make the following determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rosemead as follows:
SECTION 1 . The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Zone Variance 02-
320 is Categorically Exempt from environmental review as a Class 5 Exemption pursuant to Section
15305 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
SECTION 2 . The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that facts
do exist to justify approving Zone Variance 02 -320 accorditig to the Criteria of Chapter 17.108.020
of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows:
0 0
A. The project does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
upon other properties in the vicinity.
FINDING: The subject property is a narrow lot of only forty (40) feet in width. The size of
the lot allows for two - single- family dwellings according to the lot size requirements of the R -2: Light
Multi - Family Residential zone. Many of the properties surrounding the site are developed with two
single - family dwellings. This site will be operated in accordance with applicable City regulations, and
is in conformity with the development in and around the project site.
B. The project will not be materially detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious
to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity.
FINDING: This project has been designed to meet the setback requirements of the R -2:
Light Multi - Family Residential zone, with the exception of the second -story side yard setback along
the south property line. The proposed residence will be set back farther on the property and will not
be constructed directly across from an adjacent dwelling on the south side. The placement of the
second -story windows and the addition of a landscape buffer along the south property line will
mitigate any potential adverse impacts that may arise as a result of the proposed single - family
dwelling.
C. The project will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan.
FINDING: The proposed use is located within a residential area of the City, and is designated
Medium Density Residential in the General Plan. The proposed use is in conformity with the General
Plan, in that the policies of the General Plan encourage complementary uses that will contribute to the
economic well being of the City.
D. That because of special circumstances, the strict enforcemempf the code would deprive
the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under
identical zone classification.
FINDING: The strict enforcement of the code would limit the property of maximizing the
allowable density of this property. Many of the surrounding properties are developed with two
single - family dwellings. Also, the addition of the proposed dwelling will vastly improve the subject
property.
SECTION 3 . The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Zone Variance 02 -320, to
allow the construction of a single- family dwelling with less than the required second -story side yard
setback, on property located at 3041 Earle Avenue, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 4 . This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on
October 21, 2002, by the following vote:
YES: LOI, BREEN, ALARCON, HERRERA
NO: NONE
ABSENT: ORTIZ
ABSTAIN: NONE
SECTION 5 . The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall transmit
copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 4 °i day of November 2002,
Due Loi, Chairman
. CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting held on the 4' day of November 2002 by the
following vote:
YES:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Bra4Wrd Johnson, Secretary
i
• Rosennead Planning Commission
7one Variance 02 -320
Oclober 21, 2002
- Page 5 of 6
EXHIBIT A
ZONE VARIANCE 02 -320
3041 Earle Avenue
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
October 21, 2002
l . Zone Variance 02 -320 is approved for the development of a new single- family residence
with less than the required second -story side yard setback in the R -2; Light Multi - Family
Residential zone in accordance with the plan marked Exhibit `B ". Any revisions to the
approved plans must be resubmitted for review and approval by the Planning
Department.
2.. Approval of Zone Variance 02 -320 shall not take effect for any purpose until the
applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead a notarized affidavit stating that he /she is
aware of and accepts all of the conditions set forth in the letter of approval and this list of
conditions.
3. Zone Variance 02 -320 is approved for a period of one (1) year. Applicant shall make
progress towards initiation of proposed use or request 30 days prior to expiration from the
Planning Commission. Otherwise Zone Variance 02 -320 shall become null and void.
4. Prior to occupancy approval, four 24" box Crape Myrtle trees shall be installed every 25
feet along the side yard setback of the south property line, adjacent to the new residence.
5. The applicant shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws relative to the approved
use including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff and Health
Departments.
6. Building permits will not be issued in connection with any project until such time as all
plan check fees, and all other applicable fees are paid in full.
7. Prior to issuance of building permits, all school fees shall be paid. The applicant shall
provide the City with written verification of compliance from the Unified School District.
8. The hours of construction shall be limited from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday - Saturday. No
construction shall take place on Sundays or on any legal holidays without prior approval
by the City.
9. Planning staff shall have access to the subject property at any time during construction to
monitor progress.
10. The conditions listed on this Exhibit "A" shall be copied directly onto development plans
submitted to the Planning and Building Departments for review.
IL Occupancy will not be granted until all improvements required by this approval have
been completed, inspected, and approved by the appropriate department(s).
12. Driveways
and parking areas shall be surfaced and
improved with
Portland concrete
cement as
shown on Exhibit "B'; and thereafter
maintained in
good serviceable
condition.
13. Prior to issuance of building permits, a wall and fence plan will be required. The colors
and materials of the proposed fence shall be consistent or compliment the submitted color
and material board and first be approved by the Planning Department prior to installation.
A maximum fence /wall height of 48" along the front property line and within the front
setback area and a maximum 6' high wall anywhere to the rear of the front yard setback
applies.
Rosemead Planning Commission
Zone Parionce 02 -320
October 21, 2002
Page 6 of 6
14. Prior to issuance of Building permits, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted
to the Planning Department for review, reflecting preliminary approval of landscape /site
plan, commonly referred to as Exhibit B. Irrigation shall include automatic timers and
moisture sensors. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed and completed prior to
final Planning Department approval.
15. All ground level mechanical /utility equipment (including meters, back flow preservation
devices, fire valves, A/C condensers, furnaces and other equipment) shall be located
away from public view or adequately screened by landscaping or screening walls so as
not to be seen from the public right -of -way. Said screening shall be approved by the
Director of Planning before installation.
16. No portion of any required front and /or side yards shall be used for storage of any type.
17. All roof top appurtenances and equipment shall adequately be screened from view to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
18. The property shall be graded to drain to the street, but in no case shall such drainage be
allowed to sheet flow across public sidewalk. ' A grading and /or drainage plan shall be
prepared, submitted to and approved by the Building Official, and such grading and
drainage shall take place in accordance with such approved plan.
19. The numbers of the address signs shall be at least 4" tall with a minimum character width
of 1/4 ", contrasting in color and easily visible at driver's level from the street. Materials,
colors, location and size of such address numbers shall be approved by the Director of
Planning prior to installation.
20.. Applicant shall obtain a public works permit for all work in or adjacent to the public
right -of -way.
21. Applicant shall install and complete all necessary public improvements, including but not
limited to street, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, handicap ramps, and storm drains, along the
entire street frontage of the development site as required by the Director of Planning.
22. The dwelling unit shall be provided with water conservation fixtures such as low -flush
toilets and low -flow faucets. The hot water heater and lines shall be insulated.
Landscaping irrigation systems shall be designed for high efficiency and irrigation timers
programmed for maximized water usage.
23. All requirements of the Building and Safety Department and Planning Department shall
be complied'with prior to the final approval of the proposed construction.
24. Violation of the conditions of approval may result in citation and /or initiation of
revocation proceedings.