PC - 1967 - 13 - Denying a Zone Variance: Case Number 50P
RESOLUTION NO. 67 -13
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROSEMEAD DENYING A ZONE VARIANCE: CASE
NUMBER 50.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1'. The *Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that an application was duly filed by.Louis and
Jeanne Schreckler, with respectto real property described as
follows:
The Easterly 112.25' of Lots 26,E 27 Tract
#5189 as shown on a Map Recorded in Book 90
Pages 23 to 30 of Maps, in the Office of the
County of Los Angeles ,
requesting a Zone Variance, on property in the R -1 (Single Family
Residential) Zone to permit: .
a zone variance on property in the R -"1 Zone having an area of
10,331.5 square feet to be divided into two lots, each with less
than the required minimum,area; the existing dwelling to be re-
moved and each lot to be developed with anew single family dwelling,
the attached garage on the south lot to penetrate two feet into
the required side yard;
that a public hearing was duly set for Tuesday, August 15, 1967.,
at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall, 3018 North Charlotte, Rosemead,
California, and a notice of the time, date, place and purpose of
aforesaid hearing was duly given; that a hearing was duly held
at the aforementioned time and place.
Section 2. The Planning Commission further finds and
determines that facts do not exist as required by Section 9124
and 9126 et seq, of the Ordinances of the City of Rosemead
justifying a granting of the Zone Variance.
Section 3. The Planning Commission further finds:
1. that the requested development is not in
accord with the proposals of the General
Plan adopted by the Planning Commission.
2. that the applicants have not submitted any
evidence of existing hardship to justify
the proposed variance.
Section 4. Based on the aforementioned findings the
Commission hereFy denies a variance with respect to that property
described in Section 1 of this resolution.
Section 5. This action shall become final and effective
after ten (10 ays after this decision by the Planning Commission
unless within such time a written appeal is filed with the City
Clerk, for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided
in the Zoning Ordinance.
Section 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption
of this reso uttion and shall transmit copies of same to the appli-
cant and the Rosemead City Clerk.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED This 15th day of August 1967.
airman, P annip Commission
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead at
their regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of August, 1967,
by the following.vote:
Ayes: Commissioners: Larson, .Pike and Taylor
Nos: Commissioners: O'Hagan
Absent:Commissioners: Holmes
Executive Secretary