CC - Item 2A - Municipal Code Amendment 13-01 an Ordinance Reinforcing the City's Current Ban on Madeical Marijuana Dispensaries In All Zonging DistrictsROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JEFF ALLRED, CITY MANAGER
DATE: JANUARY 28, 2014
SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 13 -01
AN ORDINANCE REINFORCING THE CITY'S CURRENT BAN ON
MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISP ENSARIES IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS
SUMMARY
The City's Zoning Code (Title 17 of the Rosemead Municipal Code) is a "permissive"
use ordinance. In a "permissive" use ordinance only the land uses specifically listed in
the zoning code are allowed within the specific zoning district. Land uses that are not
listed are not allowed. Although the City's Zoning Code was drafted sufficiently to
permanently ban medical marijuana dispensaries citywide, choosing to incorporate the
proposed ordinance will reinforce the current prohibition on medical marijuana
dispensaries consistent with California Supreme Court approved law.
On January 6, 2014, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised
public hearing relative to Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01. Upon hearing written and
oral testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13 -20, recommending
that the City Council ADOPT Ordinance No. 935 (Attachment "A ") approving the
municipal code amendment without any deletions, additions, or modifications. The
Planning Commission staff report (Attachment "B ") and Resolution No. 13 -20
(Attachment "C ") have been included in this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines,
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for
resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
ITEM NUMBER: 2A
City Council Report
January 28, 2014
Page 2 of 4
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Conduct the noticed public hearing and receive public comment,
2. Introduce for First Reading, by title only, Ordinance No. 935: "An Ordinance of
the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California, Amending Title 17 "Zoning"
of the City's Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 17.40 for the Purpose of
Reinforcing and Confirming the City's Current Ban on Medical Marijuana
Dispensaries in all Zoning Districts," and bring back Ordinance No. 935 to the
meeting of February 11, 2014 for consideration of adoption.
ANALYSIS
After considerable monitoring of legal actions and public meetings between 2009 and
2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 910, which amended the 1959 Zoning
Code by adding Chapter 17.106 to prohibit specifically the siting of any medical
marijuana dispensaries citywide on April 12, 2010. The City did not carry this Chapter
forward in the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update, as the new code was drafted as a
"permissive" use ordinance. Section 17.08.050.B. of Article 2, Chapter 17.08
(Establishments of Districts and General Requirements), states that: uses of land not
listed as permitted in Sections 17.12.020, 17.16.020, 17.20.020, 17.24.020, and
17.28.020 shall not be permitted unless any such unlisted use is determined to be
permitted by the Community Development Director in accordance with Section
17.04.040. A medical marijuana dispensary is not identified as a permitted use in any of
the permitted land use tables for each applicable zoning district. Therefore, medical
marijuana dispensaries are currently prohibited in all zoning districts. Nonetheless,
Section 17.04.040 could allow a medical marijuana dispensary to attempt to claim that it
is "similar" to a permitted or conditionally permitted use. This argument, however
unsubstantiated, would require the Community Development Director to make a
determination. This determination is appealable to the City Council. To remove this
drawn out process, the City will be better served to specifically call out the City ban on
such dispensaries.
In August 2011, the State legislature adopted AB 1300, which amended California Health
and Safety Code Section 11362.83 to read: Nothing in this article shall prevent a city or
other local governing body from adopting and enforcing any of the following:
a) Adopting local ordinances that regulate the location, operation or
establishment of a medical marijuana cooperative or collective.
b) The civil and criminal enforcement of local described in subdivision (a).
c) Enacting other laws consistent with the article. [sic]
This local regulatory authority over medical marijuana dispensaries was affirmed by the
California Supreme Court last year when the Court ruled that local governments may
enact zoning ordinances totally banning medical marijuana. In City of Riverside v. Inland
City Council Report
January 28, 2014
Page 3 of 4
Empire Patients Health and Wellness Center, Inc. (2013) 56 Cal. 4" 729, the Court upheld
an injunction granted to the City of Riverside against a medical marijuana dispensary.
Given the litigious background of the medical marijuana dispensary community as well
as the significant, negative secondary effects of medical marijuana dispensaries on the
health, safety, and welfare of the communities in which they have been established, it is
prudent that the City clearly prohibit dispensaries consistent with the City of Riverside
opinion and the Health and Safety Code. The proposed amendment will reincorporate
the 2011 provisions into the current code to reinforce and make the City's current ban on
medical marijuana dispensaries abundantly clear and to avoid forcing the Community
Development Director to make a potentially - appealable determination on similarity of uses
contentions.
MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS
Article 6, Chapter 17.152 of the Rosemead Municipal Code sets forth the procedures
and requirements for zoning code amendments. Section 17.152.060.B sets forth the
following findings that must be met:
A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
specific plan;
The proposed Municipal Code Amendment clarifies that medical marijuana
dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts of the City. Medical marijuana
dispensary uses are not allowed by the current General Plan and Zoning Code.
Adopting Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 maintains the current consistency with
the General Plan and between the General Plan and Zoning Code.
B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and
Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 will promote public health, safety, and general
welfare and serve the goals and purposes of Title 17 by clarifying and confirming
that medical marijuana dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts in the City.
The continued prohibition will ensure that none of the negative side effects of
medical marijuana dispensaries will negatively impact the general welfare of the
City. The amendment does not authorize any changes to the environment and will
have no impacts to properties in the City or their surrounding environment.
C. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of
the Zoning Code.
The proposed
Municipal Code
Amendment clarifies
that
medical marijuana
dispensaries are
prohibited in all
zoning districts of the
City.
Medical marijuana
dispensary uses
are not allowed
by the current General
Plan
and Zoning Code.
City Council Report
January 28, 2014
Paoe 4 of 4
Adopting Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 maintains the current consistency with
all other provisions of the Zoning Code.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65091, this public hearing notice has
been published in at least one (1) newspaper of general circulation within the local
agency, as the number of owners of real property within 300 feet of the project site is
greater 1,000. Lastly, this notice is also posted in five (5) public locations, specifying
the availability of the application, plus the date, time and location of the public hearing.
LEGAL REVIEW
The attached Ordinance No. 935 has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
Prepared by:
� _ %,
Sheri Bermejo
City Planner
Submitted by:
Michelle G. Ramirez
Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Ordinance No. 935
Attachment B: Planning Commission Staff Report, January 6, 2014
Attachment C: Planning Commission Resolution No. 13 -20
ATTACHMENT A
Reserved
ORDINANCE NO. 935
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17
"ZONING" OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE BY
ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 FOR THE PURPOSE OF
REINFORCING AND CONFIRMING THE CITY'S
CURRENT BAN ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA
DISPENSARIES IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS
WHEREAS, in 1970, Congress enacted the Controlled Substance ACT ( "CSA ")
which, among other things, make it illegal to import, manufacture, distribute, possess or
use marijuana in the United States, and
WHEREAS, in 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215,
which was codified as Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5and following, and entitled
the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (the "Act "), and
WHEREAS, the intent of Proposition 215 was to enable seriously ill Californians to
legally possess, use, and cultivate marijuana under limited, specified circumstances, and
WHEREAS, on January 1, 2004, Senate Bill ( "SB ") 420 went into effect. SB 420
was enacted by the Legislature to clarify the scope of the Act, and to allow cities and
counties to adopt and enforce rules and regulations consistent with SB 420 and the Act.
WHEREAS, these new regulations and rules became known as the Medical
Marijuana Program, which included a list of facilities that could qualify as "primary
caregivers" and dispense marijuana to qualified patients. The only facilities the Legislature
authorized to serve as "primary caregivers" are licensed clinics, health care facilities,
residential care facilities, home health facilities and hospices which provide medical care to
qualified patients (Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 11362.7 (d)(1)), and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2005, the United States Court issued its decision in
Gonzales v. Raich ( 2005) 125 S. Ct. 2195, which held that Congress, under the
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, has the authority and power to
prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana even if the cultivation or use complied with
California law, and
WHEREAS, in August 2011, the State legislature adopted AB 1300, which
amended California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.83 to read "Nothing in this
article shall prevent a city or other local governing body from adopting and enforcing any of
the following:
a) Adopting local ordinances that regulate the location, operation or establishment of a
medical marijuana cooperative or collective.
b) The civil and criminal enforcement of local described in subdivision (a).
c) Enacting other laws consistent with the article," and
WHEREAS, such local regulatory authority over medical marijuana dispensaries
has been affirmed by the California Supreme Court (See City of Riverside v. Inland Empire
Patients Health and Wellness Center, Inc. (2013) 56 Cal. 4 th 729.), and
WHEREAS, citizens and law enforcement officers have reported an increase of
crimes, such as loitering, and an increase in traffic, odor, and noise in the vicinity of
dispensaries, and the sale of illegal drugs, including the resale of marijuana from
dispensaries, in the areas immediately surrounding such medical marijuana dispensaries,
and
WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Code (Title 17 of the Rosemead Municipal Code) is a
"permissive" use ordinance; only the land uses specifically listed in the Zoning Code are
allowed within the specific zoning district. Land uses that are not listed are not allowed;
and
WHEREAS, even though the "permissive use" nature of the City's Zoning Code
does permanently ban medical marijuana dispensaries citywide, adoption of this
Ordinance will reinforce the existing ban on medical marijuana dispensaries and avoid the
potential for confusion on the part of the public, and
WHEREAS, in enacting this Ordinance, it is the Council's intention that nothing
contained herein be construed to allow persons to engage in conduct that endangers
others or causes a public nuisance, nor to allow any activity related to the cultivation,
distribution, or consumption of marijuana that is illegal, and
WHEREAS, in light of these findings and facts, the City Council finds that it is
contrary to the public health, safety, and welfare to permit the operation of medical
marijuana dispensaries, as defined herein, within the City of Rosemead such that a
permanent and obvious ban on that use is proper.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD HEREBY ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Compliance with CEQA The Planning Commission HEREBY
DETERMINES that the proposed amendment does not authorize any changes to the
environment and will have no impacts to properties in the City or their surrounding
environment, as medical marijuana dispensaries are currently not permitted in any zoning
4
district of the City. The resolution provides zoning regulations which specifically confirm
and reinforce the City's current ban on medical marijuana dispensaries. This Ordinance is
not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections
15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect
physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as
defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title
14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the
environment, directly or indirectly.
SECTION 2: Findings. The City Council HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that
facts do exist to justify approving Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 in accordance with
Chapter 17.152, Section 17.152.040 of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows:
A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
specific plan;
FINDING: The proposed Municipal Code Amendment clarifies that medical
marijuana dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts of the City. Medical marijuana
dispensary uses are not allowed by the current General Plan and Zoning Code. Adopting
Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 maintains the current consistency with the General
Plan and between the General Plan and Zoning Code.
B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City; and
FINDING: Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 will promote public health, safety,
and general welfare and sere the goals and purposes of Title 17 by clarifying and
confirming that medical marijuana dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts in the
City. The continued prohibition will ensure that none of the negative side effects of
medical marijuana dispensaries will negatively impact the general welfare of the City. The
amendment does not authorize any changes to the environment and will have no impacts
to properties in the City or their surrounding environment.
C. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of
the Zoning Code.
FINDING: The proposed Municipal Code Amendment clarifies that medical
marijuana dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts of the City. Medical marijuana
dispensary uses are not allowed by the current General Plan and Zoning Code. Adopting
Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 maintains the current consistency with all other
provisions of the Zoning Code.
SECTION 3: Amendment to Title 17 . An amendment adding Chapter 17.40 to
Title 17 of the Rosemead Municipal Code entitled "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries," as
shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto is here by adopted.
ki
SECTION 4: Severability The City Council hereby declares that, should any
provision, section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance or any part thereof, be rendered or declared invalid or unconstitutional by any
final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive
legislation, such decision or action shall not affect the validity of the remaining section or
portions of the Ordinance or part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would
have independently adopted the remaining provisions, sections, subsections, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses, phrases, or words of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any
one or more provisions, sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases,
or words may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 5: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after
its adoption.
SECTION 6: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and post a certified copy of the
full Ordinance in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption and
within 15 days after adoption of the Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of
the Ordinance with the names of the Council Members voting for and against the
Ordinance. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2014
Polly Low, Mayor
City of Rosemead, California
ATTEST:
Gloria, Molleda, City Clerk
City of Rosemead, California:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Rachel H. Richman, City Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
9
ORDINANCE935
Chapter 17.40 MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES
Sections:
17.40.010 Definitions.
17.40.020 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Prohibited.
17.40.030 Civil Injunction.
17.40.010 Definitions.
A. "Establish" or "Operate" a medical marijuana dispensary (as defined in this Section)
means and includes any of the following:
1. The opening or commencement of the operation of a medical marijuana
dispensary;
2. The conversion of an existing business, facility, use establishment, or location to
a medical marijuana dispensary;
3. The addition of a medical marijuana dispensary to any other existing business,
facility, use, establishment, or location.
B. "Marijuana" means all parts of the plant Cannabis, whether growing or not; the seeds
thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound
manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds, or resin.
It includes Marijuana infused in foodstuff. It does not include the mature stalks of the
plant, fiber produced from the stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant,
any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the
mature stalks (except resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized
seeds of the plant that are incapable of germination.
C. "Medical Marijuana" is Marijuana used for medical purposes where that medical use
is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has
determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of Marijuana in the
treatment of acquire immune deficiency syndrome ( "AIDS "), anorexia, arthritis,
cancer, chronic pain, glaucoma, migraine, spasticity, or any other serious medical
condition for which Marijuana is deemed to provide relief as defined in subsection (h)
of Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7.
D. "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" means any business, facility, use, establishment, or
location, whether fixed or mobile, where Medical Marijuana is made available to,
9
delivered to and /or distributed by or to, three or more of the following a "primary
caregiver," "a qualified patient," or a person with an "identification card," as these
terms are defined in California Health and Safety Code section 11362.5 and
following. A "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" does not include the following uses, as
long as the location of such uses are otherwise regulated by this code or applicable
law: a clinic licensed pursuant to Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety
Code, a health care facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health
and Safety Code, a residential care facility for persons with chronic life- threatening
illness licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.01 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety
Code, a residential care facility for the elderly licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.2 of
Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, a residential hospice, or a home health
agency licensed pursuant to Chapter 8 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code,
as long as any such use complies strictly with applicable law including, but not
limited to, Health and Safety Code section 11362.5 and following.
17.40.020 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Prohibited.
A. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries are prohibited in all zones in the City and shall not
be established or operated anywhere in the City.
B. No person may own, establish, open, operate, conduct, or manage a Medical
Marijuana Dispensary in the City, or be the lessor of property where a Medical
Marijuana Dispensary is located. No person may participate as an employee,
contractor, agent, volunteer, or in any manner or capacity in any Medical Marijuana
Dispensary in the City.
C. No use permit, site development permit, tentative map, parcel map, variance,
grading permit, building permit, building plans, zone change, business license,
certificate of occupancy, or other applicable approval will be accepted, approved, or
issued for the establishment or operation of a Medical Marijuana Dispensary.
D. Nothing contained in this Section shall be deemed to permit or authorize any use or
activity which is otherwise prohibited by any state or federal law.
17.40.030 Civil Injunction.
The violation of this Section shall be and is hereby declared to be a public nuisance and
contrary to the public interest and shall, at the discretion of the City, create a cause of
action for injunctive relief.
ATTACHMENT B
Reserved
ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE ROSEMEAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION
DATE: JANUARY 6, 2014
SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 13 -01
AN ORDINANCE REINFORCING THE CITY'S CURRENT BAN ON
MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENS IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS
Summary
The City's Zoning Code (Title 17 of the Rosemead Municipal Code) is a "permissive"
use ordinance. In a "permissive' use ordinance only the land uses specifically listed in
the zoning code are allowed within the specific zoning district. Land uses that are not
listed are not allowed. Although the City's Zoning Code was drafted sufficiently to
permanently ban medical marijuana dispensaries citywide, choosing to incorporate the
proposed ordinance will reinforce the current prohibition on medical marijuana
dispensaries consistent with California Supreme Court approved law.
Environmental Determination
Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines,
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for
resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
Staff Recommendation
Based on the analysis and findings contained in this report, it is recommended that the
Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 13 -20 (Exhibit "A "), a resolution
recommending that the City Council ADOPT Ordinance No. 935 (Exhibit "B "), amending
Title 17 "Zoning" of the Rosemead Municipal Code adding Chapter 17.40 to reinforce
and confirm that medical marijuana dispensaries are prohibited citywide.
Background
After considerable monitoring of legal actions and public meetings between 2009 and
2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 910, which amended the 1959 Zoning
Code by adding Chapter 17.106 to prohibit specifically the siting of any medical
marijuana dispensaries citywide on April 12, 2010. The City did not carry this Chapter
forward in the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update, as the new code was drafted as a
"permissive" use ordinance. Section 17.08.050.B. of Article 2, Chapter 17.08
(Establishments of Districts and General Requirements), states that: uses of land not
Planning Commission Meeting
January 6, 2014
Page 2 of 14
listed as permitted in Sections 17.12.020, 17.16.020, 17.20.020, 17.24.020, and
17.28.020 shall not be permitted unless any such unlisted use is determined to be
permitted by the Community Development Director in accordance with Section
17.04.040. A medical marijuana dispensary is not identified as a permitted use in any of
the permitted land use tables for each applicable zoning district. Therefore, medical
marijuana dispensaries are currently prohibited in all zoning districts, though Section
17.04.040 could allow a medical marijuana dispensary to claim that it is "similar" to a
permitted or conditionally permitted use, which would then force the Community
Development Director to make an appealable.
In August 2011, the State legislature adopted AB 1300, which amended California Health
and Safety Code Section 11362.83 to read: Nothing in this article shall prevent a city or
other local goveming body from adopting and enforcing any of the following:
a) Adopting local ordinances that regulate the location, operation or
establishment of a medical marijuana cooperative or collective.
b) The civil and criminal enforcement of local described in subdivision (a).
c) Enacting other laws consistent with the article. [sic]
This local regulatory authority over medical marijuana dispensaries was affirmed by the
California Supreme Court when the Court ruled that local governments may enact zoning
ordinances totally banning medical marijuana. In City of Riverside v. Inland Empire
Patients Health and Wellness Center, Inc. (2013) 56 Cal. 4th 729, the Court upheld an
injunction granted to the City of Riverside against a medical marijuana dispensary.
Given the litigious background of the medical marijuana dispensary community as well
as the significant, negative secondary effects of medical marijuana dispensaries on the.
health, safety, and welfare of the communities in which they have been established, it is
prudent that the City clearly prohibit dispensaries consistent with the City of Riverside
opinion and the Health and Safety Code. The proposed amendment will reincorporate
the 2011 provisions into the current code to reinforce and make the City's current ban on
medical marijuana dispensaries abundantly clear and to avoid forcing the Community
Development Director to make a potentially - appealable determination on similarity of uses.
Municipal Code Requirements
Article 6, Chapter 17.152 of the Rosemead Municipal Code. sets forth the procedures
and requirements for zoning code amendments. Section 17.152.060.8 sets forth the
following findings that must be met:
A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
specific plan;
The proposed Municipal Code Amendment clarifies that medical marijuana
dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts of the City. Medical marijuana
dispensary uses are not allowed by the current General Plan and Zoning Code.
Adopting Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 maintains the current consistency with
Planning Commission Meeting
January 6, 2014
Page 3 of 14
the General Plan and between the General Plan and Zoning Code.
B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and
Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 will promote public health, safety, and general
welfare and serve the goals and purposes of Title 17 by clarifying and confirming
that medical marijuana dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts in the City.
The continued prohibition will ensure that none of the negative side effects of
medical marijuana dispensaries will negatively impact the general welfare of the
City. The amendment does not authorize any changes to the environment and will
have no impacts to properties in the City or their surrounding environment.
C. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of
the Zoning Code.
The proposed Municipal Code Amendment clarifies that medical marijuana
dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts of the City. Medical marijuana
dispensary uses are not allowed by the current General Plan and Zoning Code.
Adopting Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 maintains the current consistency with
all other provisions of the Zoning Code.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65091, this public hearing notice has
been published in at least one (1) newspaper of general circulation within the local
agency, as the number of owners of real property within 300 feet of the project site is
greater 1,000. Lastly, this notice is also posted in five (5) public locations, specifying
the availability of the application, plus the date, time and location of the public hearing.
Prepared by:
Sheri Bermejo
City Planner
Submitted by:
Qw �
Michelle Ramirez
Community Development Director
Reserved
ATTACHMENT C
Reserved
PC RESOLUTION 13 -20
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE MUNICIPAL
CODE UPDATE 13 -01 TO AMEND TITLE 17 "ZONING" OF THE CITY'S
MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 17.40 TO REINFORCE AND
CONFIRM THE CITY'S CURRENT BAN ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA
DISPENSARIES IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS
WHEREAS, in 1970, Congress enacted the Controlled Substance ACT ( "CSA ")
which, among other things, make it illegal to import, manufacture, distribute, possess or
use marijuana in the United States, and
WHEREAS, in 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215,
which was codified as Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5 and following, and entitled
the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (the "Act'), and
WHEREAS, the intent of Proposition 215 was to enable seriously ill Californians to
legally possess, use, and cultivate marijuana under limited, specified circumstances, and
WHEREAS, on January 1, 2004, Senate Bill ( "SB ") 420 went into effect. SB 420
was enacted by the Legislature to clarify the scope of the Act, and to allow cities and
counties to adopt and enforce rules and regulations consistent with SB 420 and the Act,
and
WHEREAS, these new regulations and rules became known as the Medical
Marijuana Program, which included a list of facilities that could qualify as "primary
caregivers' and dispense marijuana to qualified patients. The only facilities the Legislature
authorized to serve as "primary caregivers' are licensed clinics, health care facilities,
residential care facilities, home health facilities and hospices which provide medical care to
qualified patients (Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 11362.7 (d)(1)), and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2005, the United States Court issued its decision in
Gonzales v. Raich ( 2005) 125 S. Ct. 2195, which held that Congress, under the
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, has the authority and power to
prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana even if the cultivation or use complied with
California law, and
WHEREAS, in August 2011, the State legislature adopted AB 1300, which
amended California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.83 to read "Nothing in this
article shall prevent a city or other local governing body from adopting and enforcing any of
the following:
a) Adopting local ordinances that regulate the location, operation or
establishment of a medical marijuana cooperative or collective.
b) The civil and criminal enforcement of local described in subdivision (a).
c) Enacting other laws consistent with the article," and
WHEREAS, such local regulatory authority over medical marijuana dispensaries
has been affirmed by the California Supreme Court (See City of Riverside v. Inland Empire
Patients Health and Wellness Center, Inc. (2013) 56 Cal. 4th 729.), and
WHEREAS, citizens and law enforcement officers have reported an increase of
crimes, such as loitering, and an increase in traffic, odor, and noise in the vicinity of
dispensaries, and the sale of illegal drugs, including the resale of marijuana from
dispensaries, in the areas immediately surrounding such medical marijuana dispensaries,
and
WHEREAS, based upon the concerns regarding the adverse impacts on those
communities where medical marijuana dispensaries have been established, it is the intent
of the City to reinforce and confirm the City of Rosemead's current ban medical marijuana
dispensaries in all zoning districts, and
WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Code (Title 17 of the Rosemead Municipal Code) is a
"permissive" use ordinance; only the land uses specifically listed in the Zoning Code are
allowed within the specific zoning district. Land uses that are not listed are not allowed;
and
WHEREAS, even though the "permissive use" nature of the City's Zoning Code
does permanently ban medical marijuana dispensaries citywide, adoption of the proposed
Ordinance will reinforce the existing ban on medical marijuana dispensaries and avoid the
potential for ambiguity or confusion, and
WHEREAS, Chapter 17.152 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorizes the
Planning Commission to consider and recommend proposed municipal code
amendments to the City Council subject; and
WHEREAS, a on December 23, 2013, a Public Hearing Notice, specifying the
public comment period and the time and place for a public hearing pursuant to
California Government Code Section 65091(a)(4) was published in the Rosemead
Reader and posted at the five (5) public locations in the City; and
WHEREAS, on January 6, 2014, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Municipal
Code Amendment 13 -01; and
WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all
testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination.
2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rosemead as follows:
SECTION 1 . The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that the
proposed amendment does not authorize any changes to the environment and will have
no impacts to properties in the City or their surrounding environment, as medical
marijuana dispensaries are currently not permitted in any zoning district of the City. The
resolution provides zoning regulations which specifically confirm and reinforce the City's
current ban on medical marijuana dispensaries. This Ordinance is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the
activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in
the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section
15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3,
because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly
or indirectly.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
that facts do exist to justify recommending approval of Municipal Code Amendment 13-
01 in accordance with Chapter 17.152, Section 17.152.040 of the Rosemead Municipal
Code as follows:
A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
specific plan;
FINDING: The proposed Municipal Code Amendment clarifies that medical
marijuana dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts of the City. Medical
marijuana dispensary uses are not allowed by the current General Plan and Zoning
Code. Adopting Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 maintains the current consistency
with the General Plan and between the General Plan and Zoning Code.
B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and
FINDING: Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 will promote public health, safety,
and general welfare and serve the goals and purposes of Title 17 by clarifying and
confirming that medical marijuana dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts in
the City. The continued prohibition will ensure that none of the negative side effects of
medical marijuana dispensaries will negatively impact the general welfare of the City.
The amendment does not authorize any changes to the environment and will have no
impacts to properties in the City or their surrounding environment.
C. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of
the Zoning Code.
FINDING: The proposed Municipal Code Amendment clarifies that medical
marijuana dispensaries are prohibited in all zoning districts of the City. Medical
marijuana dispensary uses are not allowed by the current General Plan and Zoning
3
Code. Adopting Municipal Code Amendment 13 -01 maintains the current consistency
with all other provisions of the Zoning Code.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission does HEREBY RECOMMEND that
Chapter 17.40 (Medical Marijuana Dispensaries) of the Rosemead Municipal Code be
added to read as provided in Ordinance 935.
SECTION 4. The Planning Commission HEREBY RECOMMENDS CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL of Ordinance 935 amending regulations for medical marijuana
dispensaries within the City of Rosemead.
SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning
Commission on January 6, 2014 by the following vote:
YES: DINH, ENG, HERRERA, LOPEZ, AND TANG
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE -
ABSENT: NONE
SECTION 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and
shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 6 th day of January, 2014.
Diana Herrera,Chair
CI
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on 6 th day of January,
2014, by the following vote:
YES: DINH, ENG, HERRERA, LOPEZ, AND TANG
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
Michelle M. Ramirez, Sec1etary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gregory M. Murphy, Planning Commission Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
Reserved