Loading...
PC - Item 3A - Public Hearing - Design Review 14-04 - 9200 and 9220 Valley BoulevardROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DIVISION DATE: AUGUST 4, 1014 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW 14 -04 9200 AND 9220 VALLEY BOULEVARD Summary Brian Collins of Pacific Design Group has submitted a Design Review application requesting a fagade remodel to the existing commercial center located at 9200 and 9220 Valley Boulevard. The commercial center is developed on two (2) separate parcels, which are located in the CBD -D (Central Business District with a Design Overlay) zone. (APN 8594- 003 -022 and 8594 - 003 -023) Environmental Determination Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines exempts projects that consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. Accordingly, Design Review 14 -04 is classified as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of CEQA guidelines. Staff Recommendation Based on the analysis and findings contained in this report, it is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 14 -11 with findings (Exhibit "A ") and APPROVE Design Review 14 -04, subject to the twenty -six (26) conditions outlined in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Property History and Description The subject property is located on southeast corner Valley Boulevard and Hart Avenue. According the Los Angeles County Assessor's records, the project site consists of two (2) parcels of land totaling approximately 31,840 square feet of area (20,420 sf and 11,420 sf respectively). The two (2) parcels were developed in 1988 as a multi -unit commercial development. According to the Los Angeles County Assessor, the parcel addressed as 9200 Valley was developed with 5,925 square foot of building area and the parcel addressed as 9220 Valley Boulevard was developed with 4,600 square foot of building area. Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 Peas 2 of 14 Site and Surrounding Land Uses The project site is designated in the General Plan as Commercial and on the zoning map it is designated CBD -D (Central Business District with a Design Overlay) zone. The site is surrounded by the following land uses: North General Plan: Commercial Zoning: CBD -D (Central Business District with a Design Overlay) Land Use Commercial South General Plan. Low Density Residential Zoning: R -1 (Single Family Residential) Land Use. Residential East General Plan Commercial Zoning. CBD -D (Central Business District with a Design Overlay) Land Use Commercial West General Plan: Commercial Zoning: CBD -D (Central Business District with a Design Overlay) Land Use: Commercial Planning Commission Meeting August4,2014 Page 3 of 14 Administrative Analysis As illustrated on the elevation plans in Exhibit "C ", the applicant is proposing to modernize the commercial building by remodeling the exterior fagades of the buildings. The purpose of the proposed improvement is to update the look of the building. This project will only affect the exterior fagade, and will not add any new square footage to the structure. The building walls were originally constructed utilizing gray concrete block (split face and precision). The applicant is proposing to maintain the gray concrete walls, but modernize the front fagade of both buildings. The existing metal parapet and the tile walls will be demolished and replaced with foam cornice and stucco finished walls. According to the colored renderings, the new fagade walls are proposed with a cream color (Dunn Edwards — Candlestick Point) and the new cornice trim will be dark gray color (Dunn Edwards — Charcoal Smudge). The site is currently improved with two (2) trash enclosures. However, these enclosures do not have roofs. As shown on the site plan, the applicant is proposing to improve the trash enclosures in order to meet current zoning regulations. RMC Section 17.32.050(6) specifies that trash enclosures be equipped with self - closing, solid doors and a solid roof. A condition of approval will be added requiring the trash enclosures to be improved to meet all zoning regulations. The two (2) parcels were developed in 1988 as one (1) development, but the lots were never merged together. In an effort to keep the shopping center whole and provide adequate parking for the development, a condition of approval will be added requiring that the property owner record a covenant and agreement that will hold the two (2) parcels as one (1). Cabinet signs are mounted above each tenant space within the center. In an attempt to modernize the signage for the center, a condition of approval will be added requiring the approval of a Master Sign Program. This sign program should identify new modern signage for the center. Site Improvements During a site inspection staff discovered several issues that need to be addressed with this application. • Landscape planters are located throughout the site. However these planters are bare in areas. A condition will be added that the onsite landscaping be improved with new plant materials. • Customers or tenants were observed parking illegally, blocking existing parking stalls between the two (2) buildings. In an attempt to address this issue, the applicant has proposed to stripe and label this area as "no parking ". As a condition of approval, along with the added striping, staff will also require signage to be posted, in this area, specifying that cars will be towed if they are parked in this area. • A large storage structure and patios were constructed in the yard area adjacent to Unit 9214. These structures do not have building permits and are considered Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 Paqe 4 of 14 illegal. A condition of approval will be added requiring these structures to be removed entirely. Municipal Code Requirements Section 17.72.030 of the Rosemead Municipal Code (RMC) states that design review procedures shall be followed for all improvements requiring a building permit or visible changes in form, texture, color, exterior fapade, or landscaping. Section 17.72.050 provides the criteria by which the Planning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove a design review application: • The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general neighborhood; The applicant has provided an aesthetically complementary design for the new building facade, which will not cause negative effects on the existing commercial building and its relationship to the surrounding properties. The plans illustrate that the project consists of exterior renovations to the commercial buildings. The purpose of the proposed improvement is to modernize the building fapade. The remodeling proposal includes installing stucco to the existing facade and installing new materials, such as cornice trim to the buildings. • The plan for the proposed building and site development indicates the manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected against noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage and loading areas, This project will not generate any permanent impacts to noise levels for the surrounding area. All construction work will be required to comply with the timeframe and decibel levels indicated in the City's Noise Ordinance (Ordinance 478 and 541). Conditions of approval specifically address factors such as construction hours, screening of mechanical equipment, landscaping, and the overall maintenance of the property. • The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing building or site developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value, The proposed project will not cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value. The project consists of exterior renovations to the commercial building. The purpose of the proposed improvement is to modernize the building fagades. The remodeling proposal includes installing stucco to the existing fagade and installing new materials, such as cornice trim to the buildings. Planning Commission Meeting August4,2014 Paoe 5 of 14 The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed developments on land in the general area, especially in those instances where buildings are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center or in public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style, The property is not part of the Civic Center plan, precise plan, or land reserved for public or educational use. The project only consists of performing exterior renovations to the commercial buildings. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved; and The proposed development meets all of the minimum code requirements for the CBD -D (Central Business District with a Design Overlay) zone, and all applicable referenced code sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of public streets. The applicant is proposing to perform exterior renovations to the commercial buildings. In addition, the applicant is proposing to improve the trash enclosures. Conditions have been added to address landscape improvements, resolve illegal structures and parking issues. Public Notice Process This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process, which includes a 300' radius public hearing notice to fifty -five (55) property owners, publication in the Rosemead Reader on July 24, 2014, and postings of the notice at the five (5) public locations and on the subject site. Prepared by: Gina Casillas Planning Technician Submitted by Michelle Ramirez Community Development Director Planning Commission Meeting August4,2014 Pace 6 of 14 EXHIBITS: A. PC Resolution 14 -11 B. Conditions of Approval C. Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations dated July 21, 2014 D. Assessor Parcel Map (8594- 003 -023 and 8594- 003 -022) Planning Commission Meeting August4, 2014 Page 7 of 14 EXHIBIT "A" PC RESOLUTION 14 -11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 14 -04, FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE EXTERIOR FACADE OF THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS LOCATED AT 9200 AND 9220 VALLEY BOULEVARD IN THE CBD -D (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH A DESIGN OVERLAY) ZONE (APN: 8594- 003 -023 AND 8594- 003 -022). WHEREAS, on April 8, 2014, Brian Collins of Pacific Design Group submitted an application to renovate the exterior fagade of the commercial buildings on the site located at 9200 and 9220 Valley Boulevard; and WHEREAS, 9200 and 9220 Valley Boulevard is located in the CBD -D (Central Business District with a Design Overlay) zoning district; and WHEREAS, Section 17.72.020 & 17.72.050 of the Rosemead Municipal Code (RMC) provides the purpose and criteria for a design review, and WHEREAS, Sections 65800 & 65900 of the California Government Code and Section 17.72.050 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning Commission to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove design review applications; and WHEREAS, on July 24, 2014, fifty -five (55) notices were sent to property owners within a 300 -feet radius from the subject property, in addition to notices posted in five (5) public locations and on -site, specifying the availability of the application, plus the date, time, and location of the public hearing for Design Review 14 -04, and on July 24, 2014, the notice was published in the Rosemead Reader; and WHEREAS, on August 4, 2014, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Design Review 14 -04, and WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Design Review 14 -04 is classified as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Section 15301 of the CEQA exempts projects that consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that facts do exist to justify approving Design Review 14 -04 in accordance with Section 17.72.030 et seq., of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows: A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general neighborhood; FINDING: The applicant has provided an aesthetically complementary design for the new building facade, which will not cause negative effects on the existing commercial building and its relationship to the surrounding properties. The plans illustrate that the project only consists of performing exterior renovations to the commercial building. The purpose of the proposed improvement is to modernize the building facade. The remodeling proposal includes installing stucco to the existing facade and installing new materials, such as cornice trim to the buildings. B. The plan for the proposed building and site development indicates the manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected against noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage and loading areas; FINDING: This project will not generate any permanent impacts to noise levels for the surrounding area. All construction work will be required to comply with the timeframe and decibel levels indicated in the City's Noise Ordinance (Ordinance 478 and 541). Conditions of approval specifically address factors such as construction hours, screening of mechanical equipment, landscaping, and the overall maintenance of the property. C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing building or site developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value, FINDING: The proposed project will not cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value. The project consists of exterior renovations to the commercial building. The purpose of the proposed improvement is to modernize the building facade. The remodeling proposal includes installing stucco to the existing facade and installing new materials, such as cornice trim to the buildings. D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed developments on land in the general area, especially in those instances where buildings Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 Page 9 of 14 are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center or in public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style; FINDING: The property is not part of the Civic Center plan, precise plan, or land reserved for public or educational use. The project only consists of performing exterior renovations to the commercial buildings. E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved; and FINDING: The proposed development meets all of the minimum code requirements for the CBD -D (Central Business District with a Design Overlay) zone, and all applicable referenced code sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code. F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of public streets. FINDING: The applicant is proposing to perform exterior renovations to the commercial buildings. In addition, the applicant is proposing to improve the trash enclosures. Conditions have been added to address landscape improvements, resolve illegal structures and parking issues. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Design Review 14 -04 for the renovation of the exterior fagade of the commercial buildings on the site located at 9200 and 9220 Valley Boulevard and subject to conditions listed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days after this decision by the Planning Commission, unless within such time a written appeal is filed with the City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in Article IX - Planning and Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code. SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on August 4, 2014, by the following vote: YES: NO: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 Pace 10 of 14 SECTION 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 2014. Diana Herrera, Chair CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 4th day of August, 2014 by the following vote: YES: NO: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Michelle Ramirez, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gregory M. Murphy, Planning Commission Attorney Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 Paqe 11 of 14 EXHIBIT "B" DESIGN REVIEW 14 -04 9200 AND 9220 VALLEY BOULEVARD (APN: 8594- 003 -023 AND 8594 - 003 -022) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL August 4, 2014 1. Design Review 14 -04 is approved for the renovation of the exterior fagade of the commercial building, in accordance with the plans marked Exhibit "C ", dated July 21, 2014. Any revisions to the approved plans must be resubmitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division. 2. Approval of Design Review 14 -04 shall not take effect for any purpose until the applicant has fled with the City of Rosemead a notarized affidavit stating that he /she is aware of and accepts all of the conditions of approval as set forth in the letter of approval and this list of conditions, within ten (10) days from the Planning Commission approval date. 3. The onsite public hearing notice posting shall be removed by the end of the 10- day appeal period of Design Review 14 -04. 4. Design Review 14 -04 is approved for a period of one (1) year. The applicant shall commence the proposed project or request an extension within 30- calendar days prior to expiration. The one (1) year initial approval period shall be effective from the Planning Commission approval date. For the purpose of this petition, project commencement shall be defined as beginning the permitting process with the Planning and Building Divisions, so long as the project is not abandoned. If the Design Review 14 -04 has been unused, abandoned or discontinued for a period of one (1) year it shall become null and void. 5. The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make and /or approve minor modifications to the project and to these conditions of approval. Design Review 14 -04 is granted or approved with the City and its Planning Commission and City Council retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit, including the conditions of approval based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of the use, a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the use, or the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use. This reservation of right to review is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved under the Rosemead Municipal Code for any violations of the conditions imposed on Design Review 14 -04. Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 Page 12 of 14 7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set side, void, or annul, an approval of the Planning Commission and /or City Council concerning the project, which action is brought within the time period provided by law. 8. The following conditions must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Planning Division prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits, occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request. 9. The conditions listed on this exhibit shall be copied directly onto any development plans subsequently submitted to the Planning and Building Divisions for review. 10. The applicant shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws relative to the approved use including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff, and Health Departments. 11. Building permits will not be issued in connection with any project until such time as all plan check fees, and all other applicable fees are paid in full. Prior to issuance of building permits, any required school fees shall be paid. The applicant shall provide the City with written verification of compliance from the applicable school districts. 12. The hours of construction shall be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday to Saturday. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any federal holiday without prior approval by the City. 13. The Planning staff shall have access to the subject property at any time during construction to monitor progress. 14. The site shall be maintained in a graffiti -free state. Any new graffiti shall be removed within twenty -four (24) hours. A 24 -hour, Graffiti Hotline can be called at (626) 569 -2345 for assistance. 15. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed and litter free state in accordance with Sections 8.32.010 - 8.32.040 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, which pertains to the storage, accumulation, collection, and disposal of garbage, rubbish, trash, and debris. 16. All exterior lighting shall be fully shielded and directed downwards as to not project over property lines. 17. All landscaping on the subject property shall be rehabilitated to the satisfaction of the Planning Division prior to the Planning Division's final inspection. The landscape planters shall include a wide variety of plant materials that are drought Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 Page 13 of 14 tolerant and an irrigation system that includes a sprinkler system with automatic timers and moisture sensors. All landscaping shall be maintained at all times. 18. Prior to the finalization of building permits for the improvements to the site, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Planning Division a Master Sign Program for the entire commercial development. 19. Window signs shall not cover more than 15% of window and glass door areas. All banners and temporary signs shall be permitted by the Rosemead Planning Division prior to installation. 20. The parking area, including handicapped spaces, shall be paved and re- painted periodically to City standards to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. Such striping shall be maintained in a clear, visible, and orderly manner. 21. The trash enclosure shall be equipped with a solid roof and opaque steel self - closing and self - latching doors. The opaque doors shall be closed and all trash containers shall be stored in the appropriate trash enclosure at all times. All trash, rubbish, and garbage receptacles shall be regularly cleaned, inspected, and maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary condition. 22. The applicant shall install striping in the driveway aisle between the two (2) buildings and post "No Parking" signage on the building wall prior to the Planning Division's final inspection. At no time shall vehicles be parked in drive aisles. 23. All illegal structures onsite shall be removed entirely prior to the Planning Division's final inspection. 24. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a covenant and agreement that will hold the two (2) parcels as one (1) for review and approval by the City Engineer. Upon approval, the applicant shall record the covenant at the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office. (Engineering Division) 25. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide a courtesy notice of the start of construction to the occupants of abutting properties and provide a copy of the notice to the Planning Division. 26. Violations of the conditions of approval may result in citation and /or initiation of revocation proceedings. Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 2014 Pace 14 of 14 EXHIBIT "D" 8594 2001 N I �eN1 SUI I vul.ev � sRVO s @l yip I Y DI ..: I ST P i ' I I I 1111i I I I l: eo I I SUBJECT SITE