CC - Item 1A - Final Workshop PowerPoint Stakeholder Outreach
Development Impact Fee Update
City of Rosemead
Qp, � 28. 20�5 OSE.,,,.,EF
What Are Impact Fees ? OSE E�
roaxv s Small Town
One-time fees charged to new
development , usually at building
permit issuance
Not an ongoing fee charged to
residents or business owners
What Are Impact Fees ? OSE EP
L,daVs Small Town
May be used to fund facilities
needed to serve new development
Not for operations and
maintenance costs
Not for the share of facilities
serving existing development
Conducting an Impact
Fee Nexus Study
KOS [ME',
Mitigation Fee Act Findings
(Govt. Code §66001)
Key findings
Need : Development � Need for facilities
Benefit: Development � Use of revenue
Rough Proportionality: Fee amount
development's share of facility costs
Other findings
Purpose of fee
Use of fee revenue
Impact Fees - Basic Methodolo :• •
Estimate existing development and future
growth
Identify facility standards
Determine new facility needs and costs
Allocate share to accommodate growth
Identify alternative funding needs
Calculate fee by allocating costs per unit of
new development
Facility Standards:
Determining Need or Impact
Demand Standard Design Standard
• Physical measure of • "What type" of facility
demand for facilities not " how much"
• Clearly distinguishes • Allows for "what could
impact of growth be" but isn 't here now
versus existing • Existing deficiencies
deficiencies not clearly identified
ur Cost Standard
• Facility costs per unit of
growth
• Converts different
facility elements into a
single standard
Cost Allocation Methods:
WHAT Facilities Serve WHO
EXISTING INVENTORY PLANNED FACILITIES
Existing Facilities Planned Facilities
Existing Service Pop. New Service Pop.
SYSTEM PLAN
Existing + Planned Facilities
Existing + New Service Pop.
Allocating Cost of New Facilities:
Existing Inventory vs. System Plan
System Plan Method
(Increase Service Level)
150
Existing Inventory 140
130 Growth
Method 120 Share
110 6St New
100
90 Future Fee $ New 100
90 �¢� Facilities
Future
80 Dev. Facilities s0 Dev. Existing
70 70 Deficiency
y
60 60 0
50 50
0
40 40 0
Existin`_ Exis xistin < xisti
30 Dev. , Facilitie 30 De acilitie
20 20
10 A 10
0 0
Development Facility Needs Development Facility Needs
Allocating Cost of New Facilities:
Planned Facilities Method - "But For Growt
Planned Facilities Method Planned facilities not
150 needed BUT FOR new
140 development
130
120
110 - Use engineering models to
demonstrate need for
100
New facilities to serve growth
90 Facilities
80
70 - Usually applicable for traffic
60 & utility fees
50 Future a,
Demand
40
30
20
10
0
Demand Facility Needs
Growth Projections
2014 - 2025 Growth Projections for
residents and employees are used to
calculate Rosemead DIF
SCAG 's 2012 Regional Transportation Plan
General Plan Traffic Analysis ( KOA 2010)
California Employment Development Department
Job
NM , - .�� � Nei
'or, A
Rosemead Fee Categories 1 h
Traffic Facilities f . i
, . <
1. r„,,
Public Safety Facilities ;, AT 'f” ,, ,
s.
General Government Facilities E ti •kSAfETYCENTERI�
of* e, ‘
,„ „...)._:4,,,:„„ .._,„ .,_Park Facilities r _ t
Db..stami„r _ ,: .,.---,--:_:-.:
r Cr c .: n : ,y, .r Z, =r .i---
7, . � A LA
�,
111.11 10- .... .' 1_ ' ,.'.47C--5' •-r -- .v to :..r•
„ �^' . -- _�;.� dr►` --- sae[
to
Projected Fee R evenue
..,. ; 4, ,r_r„, .. ____,,,). , ...„,
., t_ _ ..„ 5 1 \ I .. - -
yl.;� 4� r r
s� •�
.n
ROSEMEAD PUBLIC
_
I r , 40 so_c!"#""
— SAFETY CENTER
i 1
-,_ s :At
Traffic Facilities $ 1 , 162 , 500
Public Safety Facilities $ 97 , 000
General Government Facilities $ 673 , 000
Park Facilities $ 3 . 2 million
Maximum Justified Fees
Table E.1 : Proposed Impact Fee Schedule
Public General
Land Use Traffic' Safety Government Parks Total
Residential
Single Family $ 1 ,024 $ 145 $ 1 ,013 $ 5,900 $ 8,082
Multi-family 634 121 844 4,916 6,516
Nonresidential
Retail $ 1 ,136 $ 29 $ 200 N/A $ 1 ,365
Office 1 ,690 39 268 N/A 1 ,997
Industrial 1 ,136 14 99 N/A 1 ,250
Note: Fees are expressed per dw elling unit for residential or per 1,000 square feet for nonresidential land use.
1 Traffic impact fees for development in single use zones show n. Fees in mixed use zones are slightly lower
than the single use traffic fee.
Sources: Tables 3.8, 4.4, 5.5, 6.5, and 6.7 from Final Draft DIF Study (April 2015)
Implementing DIF Ordinance
Fee calculated at issuance of building permit an (
due prior to the issuance of certificate of
occupancy.
Fee is charged to net new development
Secondary Residential Units would be charged
the Multi-Family Rate
Exemptions and Credits:
Affordable Housing Units ( Low and Very Low)
Projects in Planning-Pipeline upon effective date of DIF
Ordinance.
Nonresidential structures undergoing interior remodel (no
new square footage)
SGV City Comparison
Prototypical Development Projects
Single-Family Detached Residential Unit
(2,400 square feet of floor area)
Multi-Family Attached Residential
(20 units totaling 29,000 square feet of floor area)
Retail (50,000 square feet of floor area)
Office (50,000 square feet of floor area)
SGV City Comparison
Single - Family Prototype
Impact Fee Comparison for Single Family Project Prototype
2,400 Square Feet CITY Single-Family C
$30,000 Arcadia $8,4
$25,000 — El Monte $3,3
$20,000
$15,000 Monterey Park $6,2
Pasadena $26,3
$10,000
San Gabriel $9,9
$5,000
Single Family Impact Fee
$0 ■ Temple City $3,0
i°aa`a �octie Q�`� ae`1a ���\t.�o �o�a �`e> ��� AVERAGE $9,5
P (� eie� a� ak. yo e
�� Q e� az).<2
etc e
oc oyes
Rosemead Existing Fee: $800 per unit
Rosemead Proposed Fee: $8,082 per unit
SGV City Comparison
Multi - Family Prototype
Impact Fee Comparison for Multi Family Project Prototype
29,000 Square Feet(20 Units) Multi Family
$500,000 City Impact Fee
$450,000
$400,000 Arcadia $139,E
$350,000 El Monte $97,2
$300,000
$250,000 Monterey Park $81,2
$200,000
$150,000 Pasadena $466,]
$100,000
•Multi Family Impact Fee
$50,000 San Gabriel $124,]
$0 , ,
aye ��0 ajs et,a- ,�40 yea ire\ G`.�� Temple City $35,C
0` �\4\ ��e�e a4aa a<4,, y°e° 4' �4. AVERAGE $157,2
�`°�, Q e ea a6. Ca ,6
6,
Rosemead Existing Fee: $800 per unit
Rosemead Proposed Fee: $6,516 (Multi-Family Prototype: $130,320)
SGV City Comparison
Retail P
Impact Fee Comparison for Commercial Retail Project Prototype City Retail Impact Ft
50,000 Square Feet Arcadia $292,51
$1,200,000.0 El Monte $113,4:
$1,000,000.0 — Monterey Park
166,01
$800,000.0 — Pasadena
$476,51
$600,000.0 — San Gabriel $1,068,0
$400,000.0
Temple City
$200,000.0 ■ . ■Retail Impact Fee AVERAGE $423,31
$0.0
k, does' .e o eaa aaQ° Ce 4
tc ,o
Rosemead Existing Fee: $0
Rosemead Proposed Fee: $1,365 per 1,000 SF (Retail Prototype: $68,250
SGV Cit y Comparison
Office Prototype
Impact Fee Comparison for Commercial Office Project Prototype City Office Impact F
50,000 Square Feet
Arcadia $116,0
$500,000.00 -
$450,000.00 El Monte $113,4
$400,000.00 Monterey Park $166,0
$350,000.00
$300,000.00 Pasadena $205,5
$250,000.00
$200,000.00 San Gabriel $447,1
$150,000.00 Temple City
$100,000.00 ■Office Impact Fee
$50,000.00 AVERAGE $209,6
$0.00
Gaa�a o�,�e Qa$V- ae02, \��,�40 o�ea � G�ti�
e\ � �� \ °0 (1.`z1"
4`° ,$'5(
Qm' e et aQ�
Rosemead Existing Fee: $0
Rosemead Proposed Fee: $1,997 per 1,000 SF (Retail Prototype: $99,850
Survey Findings
DIFs are charged on the basis of a variety of
different factors .
Great range, by city, in terms of the types of
impact fees charged to developers.
Cities use all sorts of other funding sources to
pay for capital projects.
Cities with lower impact fees could very well
charge special taxes to fund capital improvemen
projects which Rosemead doesn 't charge .
Questions & Answers