Loading...
PC - Item 3A - Design Review 15-12 E M 9 ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION I Q- g f O S� O 40,4- STAFF REPORT CIVIC PRIDE / ORPORATED 105Q TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DIVISION DATE: MAY 16, 2016 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW 15-12 3816 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD Summary Michael Chin has submitted an application for a Design Review requesting to construct a 1 ,742 square foot addition to an existing 1,647 square foot single-family dwelling unit. The proposed project consists of a new attached two-car garage and a new detached accessory structure comprising of two enclosed parking spaces and 294 square feet of storage area. Any addition to a dwelling unit in which the total floor area with the addition equals or exceeds two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of developed living area shall be subject to a discretionary Site Plan and Design Review. The project site is located at 3816 Rosemead Boulevard (APN: 8594-016-001), in a R-3 (Medium Multiple Residential) zone. Environmental Determination Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines exempts in-fill development projects meeting the following conditions: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (2) the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (3) the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Accordingly, Design Review 15-12 is classified as a Class 32 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Section 15332 of CEQA guidelines. Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 16-07 with findings (Exhibit "A"), and APPROVE Design Review 15-12, subject to the 23 conditions of approval outlined in Attachment "A" attached hereto. Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 2 of 17 Property History and Description The subject property is located on the east side of Rosemead Boulevard, between Ralph Street and De Adalena Street. According to the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office, the site consists of one (1) parcel, totaling approximately 9,687 square feet of lot area. In 1930, a single-family dwelling unit was built on the subject property. i i , . 411 ahe 41, • !' ' — A M ...„ . g,...._. ___ ..11111 .. ..,:-.,- ,. , , ,_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . v„, _ i.,..---,.. . ,,,...-;..,..„4,,.::..-3-ii„ , , ,:...r .,....„,.., . ..:_,. ._ . _ .,,.. . _ . r-kr, :�1 :.'. ,�'�.' _:. , - ........_.. ..i.--. _ :, , _ _ _ _ _ _ , _____ __ . ,,.. __ _ _ _ . _____ . _-_,„ ,.:„...! . - :-.. - - Front Elevation (Existing) Site and Surrounding Land Uses The project site is designated in the General Plan as High Density Residential and on the Zoning Map as R-3 (Medium Multiple Residential) zone. The site is surrounded by the following land uses: North General Plan Designation: High Density Residential Zoning: R-3 (Medium Multiple Residential) Land Use: Residential South General Plan Designation: High Density Residential Zoning: R-3 (Medium Multiple Residential) Land Use: Residential East General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Land Use: Residential Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 3 of 17 West General Plan Designation: High Density Residential Zoning: R-3 (Medium Multiple Residential) Land Use: Residential Administrative Analysis As illustrated in Exhibit "B", the applicant is proposing to construct a 1 ,742 square foot addition to an existing 1 ,647 square foot single-family dwelling unit (777 square feet and 965 square feet of floor area on the first and second floor, respectively). Additionally, the applicant is proposing to construct a new attached two-car garage and a new detached accessory structure comprising of two enclosed parking spaces and 294 square feet of storage area. According to Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.12.030(B)(1)(j)(2), any addition to a dwelling unit in which the total floor area with the addition equals or exceeds two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of developed living area shall be subject to a discretionary Site Plan and Design Review. Development Standards According to Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.12.030(B)(2)(a), if an R-3 lot is improved with two or fewer dwelling units, such residential development shall comply with all R-2 Residential District Development Standards and R-2 District Specific Requirements outlined in Table 17.12.030.1 and Section 17.12.030.B.1, with the exception of the density requirement. One-family and two-family development on an R-3 lot shall comply with the density requirement of the R-3 zone. Staff has verified that the proposed single-family dwelling unit addition would be in compliance with the applicable development standards of the Rosemead Zoning Code, as demonstrated in the following table: Development Feature Required Proposed Front Yard Setback 20 ft. 32' -2" ----- North: First floor: 6'—0" Side Yard Setback Greater of 5 ft. or 10% of lot Second floor: 6'—0" width: 6 ft. South: First floor: 17'—4" Second floor: 17'—4" Rear Yard Setback 35 ft. 35'—0" Floor Area Ratio 0.35:1 (maximum) 0.349:1 Parking Three spaces in an enclosed Attached two-car garage and garage detached two-car garage Floor Plan The proposed floor plan consists of a living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, seven (7) bedrooms with closets, six (6) bathrooms, two porches, an attached two-car garage, and a detached accessory structure comprising of two enclosed parking spaces and 294 square feet of storage area. Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 4 of 17 Elevations The applicant is proposing a light beige colored stucco finish (La Habra, Oatmeal Base 100) for the exterior walls, a red-brown colored roof (Eagle Roofing, Terracotta Product #3125), and dark brown trims (Dunn Edwards, Black Walnut). Parking and Circulation Per Rosemead Municipal Code, Table 17.112.040.1, single-family dwellings with five (5) bedrooms and more than 2,000 square feet of floor area require three (3) parking spaces per dwelling unit in an enclosed garage. As illustrated on the proposed site and floor plan, the applicants are proposing an attached two-car garage and a detached two-car garage with 294 square feet of storage area towards the rear of the property Per Rosemead Municipal Code. Section 17.112.090(B)(1)(a), driveways used to serve not more than two (2) dwelling units shall be a minimum of twelve (12) feet wide. The existing driveway is ten (10) feet, six (6) inches, however, where new development is proposed, the driveway is seventeen (17) feet, four (4) inches. Fencing The applicant is proposing to maintain all existing fencing. The existing CMU stucco finished wall along the west property line is four (4) feet high. The existing four (4) feet high CMU stucco finished wall also runs along thirty-two (32) feet and two (2) inches of both the north and south property lines. The remainder of the north, south, and east property lines are surrounded by six (6) feet high CMU walls, which are not visible from public right-of-way. Landscaping The landscaping is subject to Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.12.030. The existing landscape is approximately 2,307 square feet (23.8%) of landscaping for the entire site. The landscaping will satisfy all requirements set forth in Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.12.030. In addition, a Condition of Approval has been incorporated to ensure that the existing and proposed trees shall not exceed a height of four (4) feet in the required front yard. Mechanical Equipment The applicant is proposing a ground-mounted air conditioning unit towards the rear of the property. There is an existing water heater and air conditioning unit located on the north side of the dwelling unit and an existing electric meter located on the west side (front elevation) of the dwelling unit. The air conditioning units and water heater are screened by a six (6) feet high gate and cannot be seen from the public right-of-way. A Condition of Approval has been incorporated to ensure that the existing electric meter shall be painted to match the single-family dwelling unit and screened from view. Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 5 of 17 Municipal Code Requirements According to Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.12.030(B)(1)(j)(2), any addition to a dwelling unit in which the total floor area with the addition equals or exceeds two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of developed living area shall be subject to a discretionary Site Plan and Design Review. Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(C), provides the criteria by which the Planning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application: A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general neighborhood. The subject property is located within an established residential area of the City. The applicant has provided an aesthetically complementary design, which consists of a Spanish style two-story single-family dwelling unit. The development would improve the overall aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. B. The plan for the proposed structure and site development indicates the manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected against noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage and loading areas. The proposed structure is designed with front, side, and rear setbacks that meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the R-2 zone, which creates a buffer between the proposed residence and the surrounding residences to protect against noise, vibrations, and other factors that may have an adverse effect on the environment and neighborhood. This development would not generate any foreseeable permanent negative impacts to the noise levels of the surrounding area. All construction work would be required to comply with the timeframe and decibel levels indicated in the City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance. Conditions of Approval will specifically address factors such as noise, construction hours, landscaping, and the overall maintenance of the property. C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value. The proposed project would not depreciate the appearance and value of the local environment. Staff has worked closely with the applicant to achieve a residential design that would complement the neighborhood character. The applicant has proposed a Spanish style architectural design, which incorporates some Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 6 of 17 aesthetic characteristics found in surrounding residences currently built in the San Gabriel Valley. The dwelling unit has been designed to create visual interest at the street level. The proposed design elements are similar to many homes in the surrounding area. D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed developments on land in the general area, especially those instances where buildings are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center or in public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style. The subject property is not part of the Civic Center Plan, precise plan, or land reserved for public or educational use. The applicant has proposed an appealing architectural design, which will create an improved site that is aesthetically complementary to the surrounding area. E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this Code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. The proposed development satisfies all of the minimum zoning code requirements for the R-2 (Light Multiple Residential) zone, and all applicable referenced code sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code. F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of public streets. Access to the subject site would continue to be from Rosemead Boulevard. The design and construction of this project would preserve and provide adequate access and circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The proposed addition to the single-family dwelling unit will significantly improve the visual effect of the site from the view of the public street. Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 7 of 17 Public Notice Process This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process, which includes a 300-feet radius public hearing notice to forty-one (41) property owners, publication in the Rosemead Reader on May 5, 2016, and postings of the notice at the six (6) public locations and on the subject site. Prepared by: Submitted by: A Annie Lao Michelle Ramirez Assistant Planner Community Development Director EXHIBITS: A. Planning Commission Resolution No. 16-07 with Attachment"A" (Conditions of Approval) B. Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations C. Assessor Parcel Map (APN: 8594-016-001) Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 8 of 17 EXHIBIT "A" PC RESOLUTION 16-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 15-12, PERMITTING A 1,742 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 1,647 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING UNIT WITH AN ATTACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE AND A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE COMPRISING OF TWO ENCLOSED PARKING SPACES AND 294 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE AREA. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 3816 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD (APN: 8594-016-001), IN A R-3 (MEDIUM MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL) ZONE. WHEREAS, on November 19, 2015, Michael Chin submitted a Design Review application requesting to construct a 1 ,742 square foot addition to an existing 1,647 square foot single-family dwelling unit. The proposed project consists of a new attached two-car garage and a new detached accessory structure comprising of two enclosed parking spaces and 294 square feet of storage area at located 3816 Rosemead Boulevard; WHEREAS, 3816 Rosemead Boulevard is located in the R-3 (Medium Multiple Residential) zoning district; WHEREAS, Section 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code provides the criteria for a Design Review; WHEREAS. Sections 65800 & 65900 of the California Government Code and Sections 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorizes the Planning Commission to approve, conditionally approve, or deny Design Review applications; WHEREAS, on May 5, 2016, forty-one (41) notices were sent to property owners within a 300-feet radius from the subject property, the notice was published in the Rosemead Reader, and notices were posted in six (6) public locations and on site, specifying the availability of the application, and the date, time, and location of the public hearing for Design Review 15-12; WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Design Review 15-12; and WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination. Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 9 of 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Design Review 15-12 is classified as a Class 32 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Section 15332 of CEQA guidelines. Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines exempts in-fill development projects meeting the following conditions: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (2) the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (3) the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that facts do exist to justify approving Design Review 15-12, in accordance with Section 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows: A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general neighborhood. FINDING: The subject property is located within an established residential area of the City. The applicant has provided an aesthetically complementary design, which consists of a Spanish style two-story single-family dwelling unit. The development would improve the overall aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. B. The plan for the proposed structure and site development indicates the manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected against noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage and loading areas. FINDING: The proposed structure is designed with front, side, and rear setbacks that meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the R-2 zone, which creates a buffer between the proposed residence and the surrounding residences to protect against noise, vibrations, and other factors that may have an adverse effect on the environment and neighborhood. This development would not generate any foreseeable permanent negative impacts to the noise levels of the surrounding area. All construction work would be required to comply with the timeframe and decibel levels indicated in the City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance. Conditions of Approval will specifically address factors Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 10 of 17 such as noise, construction hours, landscaping, and the overall maintenance of the property. C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value. FINDING: The proposed project would not depreciate the appearance and value of the local environment. Staff has worked closely with the applicant to achieve a residential design that would complement the neighborhood character. The applicant has proposed a Spanish style architectural design, which incorporates some aesthetic characteristics found in surrounding residences currently built in the San Gabriel Valley. The dwelling unit has been designed to create visual interest at the street level. The proposed design elements are similar to many homes in the surrounding area. D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed developments on land in the general area, especially those instances where buildings are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center or in public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style. FINDING: The subject property is not part of the Civic Center Plan, precise plan, or land reserved for public or educational use. The applicant has proposed an appealing architectural design, which will create an improved site that is aesthetically complementary to the surrounding area. E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this Code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. FINDING: The proposed development satisfies all of the minimum zoning code requirements for the R-2 (Light Multiple Residential) zone, and all applicable referenced code sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code. F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of public streets. FINDING: Access to the subject site would continue to be from Rosemead Boulevard. The design and construction of this project would preserve and provide adequate access and circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The proposed addition to the single-family dwelling unit will significantly improve the visual effect of the site from the view of the public street. I Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 11 of 17 SECTION 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Design Review 15-12 for the construction of a 1 ,742 square foot addition to an existing 1,647 square foot single-family dwelling unit. The proposed project consists of a new attached two-car garage and a new detached accessory structure comprising of two enclosed parking spaces and 294 square feet of storage area at located 3816 Rosemead Boulevard, and subject to the conditions listed in Attachment "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days after this decision by the Planning Commission, unless within such time a written appeal is filed with the City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.160.040 — Appeals of Decisions. SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on May 16, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: SECTION 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 2016. John Tang, Chair Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 12 of 17 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 16th day of May, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Michelle Ramirez, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gregory M. Murphy, Planning Commission Attorney Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 13 of 17 ATTACHMENT "A" (PC RESOLUTION 16-07) DESIGN REVIEW 15-12 3816 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD (APN: 8594-016-001) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL May 16, 2016 Standard Conditions of Approvals 1. Design Review 15-12 ("Project") is approved for the construction of a 1,742 square foot addition to an existing 1 ,647 square foot single-family dwelling unit. The proposed project consists of a new attached two-car garage and a new detached accessory structure comprising of two enclosed parking spaces and 294 square feet of storage area, in accordance with the plans marked Exhibit "B", dated May 11, 2016. Any revisions to the approved plans must be resubmitted for Planning Division review and, if satisfactory, approval. 2. The following conditions must be complied to the satisfaction of the Planning Division prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits, occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request. 3. The conditions listed on this exhibit shall be copied directly onto any development plans subsequently submitted to the Planning and Building Divisions. 4. Approval of Project shall not take effect for any purpose until the applicants have filed with the City of Rosemead ("City") a notarized affidavit stating that he/she is aware of and accepts all of the conditions of approval as set forth in the letter of approval and this list of conditions within ten (10) days from the Planning Commission approval date. 5. The on-site public hearing notice posting shall be removed by the end of the 10- day appeal period of Project. 6. Project is approved for a period of one (1) year. The applicant shall commence the approved project or request an extension within 30 calendar days prior to expiration. The one (1) year initial approval period shall be effective from the Planning Commission approval date. For the purpose of this petition, project commencement shall be defined as beginning the permitting process with the Planning and Building Divisions, so long as the project is not abandoned. If Project has been unused, abandoned, or discontinued for a period of one (1) year, it shall become null and void. Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 14 of 17 7. The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make and/or approve minor modifications to the project and to these conditions of approval. 8. Project is granted or approved with the City and its Planning Commission and City Council retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit, including the conditions of approval based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of the use, a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the use, or the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use. This reservation of right to review is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved under the Rosemead Municipal Code for any violations of the conditions imposed on Project. 9. The applicants shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set side, void, or annul, an approval of the Planning Commission and/or City Council concerning the project, which action is brought within the time period provided by law. 10. The applicants shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws relative to the approved use, including the requirements of the Planning, Building. Fire, Sheriff, and Health Departments. 11 . Building permits will not be issued in connection with any project until such time as all plan check fees and all other applicable fees are paid in full. Prior to issuance of building permits, any required school fees shall be paid. The applicant shall provide the City with written verification of compliance from the applicable school districts. 12. The numbers of the address signs shall be at least six (6) inches tall with a minimum character width of 3/4 inch, contrasting in color and easily visible at driver's level from the street. Materials, colors, location, and size of such address numbers shall be approved by the Community Development Director, or his/her designee, prior to installation. 13. The hours of construction shall be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any federal holiday, without prior approval by the City. 14. The Building Division, Planning Division, and Engineering Division shall have access to the subject property at any time during construction to monitor progress. Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 15 of 17 15. All requirements of the Building and Safety Division, Planning Division, and Engineering Division shall be complied with prior to the final approval of the proposed construction. 16. All ground level mechanical/utility equipment (including meters, back flow prevention devices, fire valves, A/C condensers, furnaces, and other equipment) shall be located away from public view or adequately screened by landscaping or screening walls so as not to be seen from the public right-of-way. The existing electric meter shall be screened to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 17. Violations of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of revocation proceedings. 18. The property shall be graded to drain to the street, but in no case shall such drainage be allowed to sheet flow across public sidewalk. A grading and/or drainage plan shall be prepared, submitted to, and approved by the Building Official, and such grading and/or drainage shall take place in accordance with such approved plan. Project Specific Conditions of Approval 19. All property that is vacant, under construction, or being demolished shall be totally enclosed around the perimeter by a fence that is a minimum of six feet in height as measured from adjacent property, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or other designated officials. The following requirements shall be met: a. The required fence shall be adequately constructed from chain-link, lumber, masonry or other approved materials. The fence shall be entirely self-supporting and shall not encroach or utilize structures or fencing on any adjacent property without prior written approval of the adjacent property owner. b. The fence shall be installed prior to the initiation of any construction or demolition and shall be continuously maintained in good condition. c. Maintenance of the property shall include the removal of trash and debris, weeding, and pruning of dead materials. d. Signs stating "PRIVATE PROPERTY, NO TRESPASSING" shall be posted on the fence. 20. All gutters, downspouts, electric meters, exterior water heaters, and similar architectural features shall be painted to match the single-family dwelling unit. Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 16 of 17 21. All existing and proposed trees shall not exceed a height of four (4) feet in the required front yard. 22. All garages shall match the main house in terms of color scheme, roofing material, roof pitch, gable orientation, and design. 23. The 735 square feet detached accessory structure shall comprise of two enclosed parking spaces (441 square feet) and storage area (294 square feet), and shall not be converted to any residential use. 1 • Planning Commission Meeting May 16,2016 Page 17 of 17 EXHIBIT "C" I to A u Z r- 1 A ) � I OW ROSEMEAD F M. //zed BLVD. S 8 • r T... �ti 39.n Go co zI dB k '9., /.'r■ o 70 60 So 4 t; 1-9 A SUBJECT D w, w ''' A _ © f\\& SITE e ► v rj I tio-S773o' - q I Z sans 60 6 > /74.1. o ;® A ed 17 a °I /7.s Es /73ss 4 ® o t /7215 ` - (4 `oi a ® - /72./6 til 10 -4 °o © o ■ /71..4.c - 4� e w• /70.77 ----- g - . u c! v ..,:0 /70.07 I 0 O _ /037 I, A ■ ® , H -I --- ----- H o ;Oo N o 60 /67.91 Go I /7S 50 V N R i ,