Ordinance No. 079 - Annexation Area No. 16ORDINANCE N0. 79
AN ORDINANCE CF THE CITY OF R00712,17.0-- D APP:'C !!T.r,
THE ANNEXA:'IWN OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY
DESIGNATED "CITY OF ROS=AD ANNEXATION AREA 110.
16" TO THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, on the 8th day of August, 1961, the City Council
of the City of Rosemead on its o,.ti^1 motion initiated proceedings for
the annexation of certain uninhabited territory to the City of
Rosemead; and
WHEP,EAS, on the 8th day of August, 1961, the Council of
the City of Rosemead did pass and adopt Resolution Ko. 61-54
giving notice of the r--oposal to annex said uninhabited territory
to the City of Rose--e~_, said territory being therein designated
as "City of Rosemead t-nnexation ±rea No. V which resolution
described the bcun8a_ies of t1e territory so proposed to be
annexed to said City; and
WHEREAS, said nssoltitisn No. 61-54 did contain a notice
of the day, hour and n".^ce wh^-z ^d where ":a said Council of said
City would h^ar prot^s:_a made by any peroc-:- czming real property
within the territory a5L•^.posed to be annc_-e:', tae tin:: of said
hearing being not less than fo*-t-.r nor mos^ '_hsn sixty d._ys from
the date of passage of said rest =scion; ar-._
. WH REAS,"on tae 26th bay of Sept;sn'eer, 1961, at the hour
of 8:00 o'clock.P.M, at 8815 East Valley io::levard, in the City of
Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, State c_`- California, said time
and place being the day and hour and place fixed in Said Resolution
No. 61-54 for hearinu protests to the said annexation, the said
Council of said City d_d hear ar_d pass u_cn all protests made to
said proposed annexation and did find and d^clare by resolution
that protests to said proposed annexation hcva not been made by
private owners of ors-h^lf of the value of the privately owned
territory proposed to lcn annexed, nor by p-,:b1_4c cwne s of one-
half of the publicly o-.m:ed prop^-ty propoea3 to be ar:vexed, nor
has a majority prot--,-- been m?aa; and
Wr? i?~AS, said territory is conti;,Mns to the City of
• Rosemead and is unin_ha.Jited territory in the County of Los Angeles;
NOW, THERv*0 the sa1A Council of the City of Rosemead
does hereby approve the annexation of said territory hereinafter
described, to the City of Rosem-nd, and does hereby further ordain
that the said territer be and ys cereby r-..=esed to the City of
Rosemead.
That said t•_rritory, t'e annexet:'cn of which to the City
of Rosemead is herein approved, is all the- territory in the County
of Los Angeles, State c£ California, more particularly described as
follows:
Be Inning e.t the inters ction or a line is parallel
with and distant southe--ly 385.00 feet, measured at right
angles, from the ncrti..rly line of Lot 5 of Tract No. 30
as per map r`sorded in Book 16 p~,e 117 of Maps, in the
office of the Cot'nt 7 "1--corder o_`• ~--id Ccun'-;? with the
.
wec`e-~ly h.~.n..:...::~:•y o`;: C _ty r,;. e:cse ~..me,_..i, --s said
boundary exited on Jtfly 5, 1961, said woot_erly boundary
being along a line rhIc-,"l is parallel with the westerly
line of said Lot 5 and pa.:,ses a point in the
northerly Line of said Lot 5, di_otant t'r_ers,on easterly
660 feet from the rorti,-aest corn..-r- of said Lot 5; thence
westerly along said first ment'_crad parallel line a
distance of 259 feet to the cente_line of Stingle Avenue,
60 feet wide, said c^n~_-erline be-InS, a line which is
parallel wit", the westerly line o-2 said Lcf 5 and passes
tT..,..--o ugh a po' t in -'-c Northerly ?.1^= of s_ d Lot 5.
79
0
distant thereon easterly 401 feet from the northwest
corner of said Lot 5; thence northerly along said center-
line of Stingle Avenue 240 feet to an angle point in
the southerly boundary of the City of Rosemead, as said
boundary existed;on,July 5, 1961; thence northerly,
easterly and following the various courses of the
boundary of the City of Rosemead as said boundary
existed on July 5, 1961, to the point of beginning.
1961. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 0 h day of October,
.
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
0
- 2 -