CC - Item 5B - Minutes of August 8, 2017MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AND CITY COUNCIL AND
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION REGULAR JOINT MEETING
AUGUST 8, 2017
Closed session
The special meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Low at 6:00 p.m.
in the Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead,
California
PRESENT: Mayor Low, Mayor Pro Tem Ly, Council
ABSENT: Council Member Alarcon
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Manis, City
McKinney, Director of Finance Lieu, Director of P;
Works Ramirez, Interim Director of Commuriit
Donohue
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council will meet in
and Clark
Richman, Assistant,, City Manager
;creation Chacon, Director of Public
ment,Valenzuela, aha City Clerk
item:
B. CONFERENCE, WIT,i11EGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION
Pufsuant,to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1)
Case` Naii%e; City o£LZosemead vs. Los Angeles County Metropolitan
meeting at 6:01 p.m. to closed session and reconvened at 7:00
p.m.
City Attorney Ridhman announced the City Council would continue their closed session
discussion at the end of the regular council meeting.
RECONVENE TO REGULAR MEETING
The regular joint meeting of the Rosemead City Council and Successor Agency to the Rosemead
Community Development Commission was called to order by Mayor Low at 7:00 p.m. in the
Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California.
PRESENT: Mayor Low, Mayor Pro Tem Ly, Council Members Armenta and Clark
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting ITEM NO. 5.13
Minutes ofAugust 8, 2017
Page 1 of 12
ABSENT: Council Member Alarcon
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Clark
INVOCATION was led by Council Member Armenta
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Manis, City Attorney Richman, Assistant City Manager
McKinney, Director of Finance Lieu, Director of Parks and Recreation Chacon, Director of Public
Works Ramirez, Interim Director of Community Development Valenzuela, and City Clerk
Donohue
2.
3.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Brian Lewin, Beautification Committee Member invited the City Council and the public to
the Night Garden Fundraiser on Wednesday, -August 16Th taking pla&"l the Rosemead
Community Recreation Center.
Ray Chavira, resident expressed safety concems at;the°Mission Inn including an uneven
sidewalk in front of 4825 Earle Avenue. Mr. Chavita requested the assistance of the City
to inspect the conditions of the such as the malfunctioning elevator and air
conditioning system.
Mayor Low suggested to Mr. Chavira to speak to stafi'to assist him with his concern.
City Manager Marais aPf tried staff would follow up and provide direction to Mr. Chavira
to help addresshis concerns,
James Berry, Beautification. Committee Member thanked the City Council and the
community Tor ,provrding-support_bbfhe.School Resource Fair and Backpack Giveaway
event' by `do`naiirig supplies, He thanked city staff, Congresswoman Judy Chu, and
Aesemblymember"":WChaufoxtheix ongoing community support.
Member Arinenta commended and thanked James Berry for his work in the
A. FormeiJraffic Commissioner Recognition — Jean Hall
Mayor Low thanked Mrs. Jean Hall for her contribution to the community and
commitment to the City during her service as a Traffic Commissioner.
Council Member Clark thanked and expressed her appreciation to Mrs. Hall for her
work on projects in the City and her overall contributions to the City.
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes of August 8, 2017
Page 2 of 12
Mayor Pro Tem Ly thanked Mrs. Hall for her years of support and encouragement
towards him to get involved in the community and to run for elected office. He also
commended her for her service to the community and the residents.
Council Member Armenta agreed with Mr. Ly's comments and thanked Mrs. Hall
for her ongoing support for her on the City Council and advocating for the City.
Jean Hall thanked the City Council for the opportunity to serve the City of
Rosemead and the community throughout the years.
The City Council presented Jean Hall with a plaque of recognition for her years of
service to the Traffic Commission.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Appeal of Design Review 17-02: 3940'Rosemead Boulevard
Recommendation: That the City Council uphold, the Planning Commission's
decision to deny Design Review 17-02 and adopt Resolution No. 2017-37
(Attachment A).
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF,,,LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DENYING,, : DESIGN" REVIEW 17-02, A
REQUEST TO RE-IMAGE AN EXISTING 15 -FOOT TALL
FREESTANDING SIGN,EROM TWO INDIVIDUAL DOUBLE -
FACE CABINENT SIGNS TO A DOUBLE -SIDED SINGLE
PANEL ELECTRONIC LED'" MESSAGE BOARD. THE
SUBJECT ,,.,ITE" IS LOCATED AT 3940 ROSEMEAD
BOULEVARD IN-TIIE,CENTAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH
bESIGN OVERLAY (CBD/D-O) ZONE (APN: 8594-008-039).
Assistant Planner Lao xeported the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing for Dcsign Review 17-02 for a request to re-image an existing 15 -foot tall
freestanding sign from two individual double -face cabinet signs, to a double -sided
single panel electronic Light Emitting Diode (LED) message board. Staff requested
the"City Council to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the
anplicant's Design Review 17-02.
Mayor Low opened the public hearing at 7:26 p.m.
Michael Ehrenberger, representative of Leader USA explained there were two
reasons the request was denied from the Planning Commission. First was
illumination brightness, then the flashing and changing of images. He continued to
explain other cities have adopted dimming capabilities of the signs which addresses
illumination concerns. As for the flashing concerns, the City codes allow for a time
and temp LED digital board similar to the requested LED digital board of the
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes of August 8, 2017
Page 3 of 12
applicant. He requested a continuance of the public hearing to allow for a
presentation of the boards before the City Council.
Adrian Castaiieda, applicant, spoke about neon sign illumination and clarified
concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. He demonstrated with a letter
signage the light illumination and the type of flashing being requested.
Council Member Armenta asked what the municipal code stated regarding digital
signs.
Assistant Planner Lao replied the municipal code
sign flashing.
Brian Lewin, objected to the applicant's
Commission's denial. He stated the ap
and inappropriate tone in reference to
documents and in their letter of appeal
prove their case for recommending the
why staff should grant exceptions to tl
provided to the commission was given during their
the commission's decisiori- was based on opinio
presented to the City Council coiild be useful in res
to incorporate into an updated sigh code. In conclu
to accept both staff s and Planning Commissio;
signage application.
Mayor,Low closedtle public hearing at 7:35 p.m.
a definition for a
rest and. supported the Planning
)eriodically psed a patronizing
commission In, their submitted
the implication thatstaff must
leer than the applicant justifying
to scientific backup information
meeting, and the appeal claimed
i. He also suggested the items
earthing the potential regulation
;i'01111fie advised the City Council
r recommendation to deny the
Mayor Pro Tim Ly, asked staff whentithe Planning Division was going to update the
Interim Community•Development Director Valenzuela replied staff was currently
working wit City City Attorney to create a revised ordinance to update the code by
,next year.
Pro Teen Ly stated the reason staff recommended a denial of the project was
the land use interpretation of the code by the City Attorney. He asked City
;ykRichman what the rationale of the interpretation of the code was.
City Attorney Richman explained the project was received by her office with staff s
interpretation of the code. Cities are given the discretion to interpret their own codes
in a reasonable way. She reiterated that flashing interpreted by staff was based on
the city's code and it was defined as something changing, or changing that is
moving or flashing.
Interim Community Development Director Valenzuela added the applicant was
proposing to change a slide every 10 seconds.
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes ofAugust 8, 2017
Page 4 of 12
Mayor Pro Tem Ly clarified, flashing was interpreted by staff as something that
changed in general, such as a school sign displaying informational updates.
Furthermore, agreed with Mr. Lewin's statements with the exception on the
applicant asking staff to justify their opinions. Regardless of whom the applicant is
or the position, they should be able to request explanations from staff, Council, and
or a Commission regarding City policies and interpretations.
Council Member Armenta stated the applicant's letter of appeal stated the denial
was based on staff's opinion, which was inaccurate by the applicant.
Council Member Clark expressed concerns there Was no "mitigation plan with
flashing signs affecting residents near the business.
Mayor Low agreed and added the sign
walking by.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly disagreed with; the.
Commission failed on their due diligeridi
be updated soon because there should be
ACTION: Moved by Council Member Clark at
to uphold the Planning Commission's decision
adopt Resolution No. 2017-37 M6tioix Was cat
Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly and Absept: Alarc
5. CONSENT
0
and pedestrians
imission's'vote;,stating the
1 vote. The sigri code should
digital signs where it's safe.
aded by Mayor Pro Tem Ly
;Design Review 17-02 and
'a unanimous vote: AYES:
ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSJ j-, CALIFORNIA,, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS
AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $950,548.64 NUMBERED
96979 Z`FIROUGH NUMBER 96980, AND NUMBERED 96982
THROUGH NUMBER 97049 INCLUSIVELY, WHICH IS
ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
Adopt Resolution No. 2017-35
Resolution No. 2017-36
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes of August 8, 2017
Page 5 of 12
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS
AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $486,520.62 NUMBERED
96950 THROUGH NUMBER 96978, AND NUMBER 96981,
AND NUMBERED 97050 THROUGH NUMBER 97105
INCLUSIVELY, WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE
A PART HEREOF
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2017-36
• Resolution No. 2017-12 SA
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THF,ROSEMEAD COM:
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION'-- OF THE `.GI
ROSEMEAD ALLOWING,. CERTAIN CLAIM
DEMANDS IN THE SUM Off' ;$210,997.43 NUMBER]
THROUGH NUMBER 12018,,_, INCLUSIVELY, W.
ATTACHED HERETO AND MADEA PART HEREOF
Recommendation: Ad6bt Resolution No. 2017,j2 SA
B. City Council Meeting
AS THE
OF
AND
IS
That the City Council approve the minutes from the regular
,--017 and the regular meeting on July 25, 2017.
C. Sidewalk'Installati6t ,Project at EarleAyenue and Wells Street—Award of Contract
Recommendatiot.It is reooinmended that the City Council take the following
actrons i (1), Apprpve _the plans and specifications for the Sidewalk Installation
Project at Ede Avenue frpm Mission Dxive to Wells Street; and (2) Authorize the
City Managpt,to entex'i3�to a contract with Harry H. Joh Construction, Inc. in the
,mount of $41K,665.80, and authorize a contingency in the amount of $41,200.00
(approximately 0%) to cover the cost of any unforeseen construction expenses.
D. Anui a"alary`Survey Results and Adoption of Salary and Benefits Resolutions
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No.
2017-38 for General Service Unit; Resolution No. 2017-39 for Middle
Management, Professional, and Confidential Service Unit; Resolution No. 2017-40
for Management Service Unit; Resolution No. 2017-41 for Part -Time Salary
Schedule; and Resolution No. 2017-42 for Comprehensive City-wide Salary
Schedule for all Regular Full-time City Classifications.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes ofAugust 8, 2017
Page 6 of 12
SALARY RANGES AND BENEFITS FOR CLASSIFICATIONS
IN THE GENERAL SERVICES UNIT OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL
SALARY RANGES AND BENEFITS FOR CLASSIFICATIONS
IN THE MIDDLE MANAGEMENT, PROFESSIONAL, AND
CONFIDENTIAL SERVICE OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA,
SALARY RANGES AND BENEI
IN THE MANAGEMENT SE
ROSEMEAD
A RESOLUTION OF THE GI
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
SALARY RANGES FOR PAI
THE SERVICE OF THE CITY
IL"OF THE CITY OF
Lj'SHING ANNUAL
t CLASSIFICATIONS
OF "THE CITY OF
OF THE
SIFICATIONS IN
A RESOLUTION OF,7,11E, ; CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, 0ALIFORFiIA, ESTABLISHING A
COMPREHENSIVE CITY -WIDE -.SALARY SCHEDULE FOR
ALL SERVICE UNITS 'OF THE CITY"OF ROSEMEAD
E. Award gf,Contracffai Website Redesign, Hosting, and Maintenance
balance.
endatiop: kJ5 recommended that the City Council authorize the Citym
to enteY jnto an ag eeen with CivicLive for website design, hosting, and
hce Services and appropriate $3,800 from unassigned general fund
Crossing Guard Services Agreement with All City Management
Annual Cost Sharing Agreement with Garvey School District
Re�ndaton: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to (1) Execute
an Am4oiiicnt to an Agreement with All City Management Services, Inc. for
crossing guard services through June 30, 2019; and (2) Execute the cost sharing
agreement with the Garvey School District in funding the crossing guard services
for the 2017/18 FY, and (3) Appropriate additional funding in the FY 2017/18
budget for crossing guard services in the amount of $5,506.20.
ACTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Ly and seconded by Council Member
Armenta to approve the Consent Calendar items A, B, C, D, E, and F. Motion was
carried by a unanimous vote: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly and ABSENT:
Alarcon
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes ofAugust 8, 2017
Page 7 of 12
6. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER & STAFF
A. Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Ad Hoc Committee Vacancy
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council select a Traffic
Commissioner to fill the vacancy for the GASP Ad Hoc Committee Member.
Interim Community Development Director Valenzuela explained former Traffic
Commissioner Joanne Russell -Chavez did not reapply to the Traffic Commission.
As a result, a vacancy was created on the Garvey Averiue,Specific Plan Ad Hoc
Committee. Staff requested the City Council appoint anew Traffic Commissioner
to fill the position.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly asked if any Traffic
serving on the Garvey Avenue Specific ]
Director of Public Works R,
interest for the appointment.
Mayor Low asked if the Council would wa
Commissioner to the Garve'Y-'Avenue Specific
Council Member Armenta n,
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan
CERT certifiedato,do traffic c
interest in
continue appointing a Traffic
Ad Hoc Committee.
cssioner James Berry to the
noted Mr. Berry is advanced
ACTION`:. Moved by Council Member Armenta and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Ly to app' i TrafficCommissionerJames Berry to the Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan Ad HoeCommittee.Motion was carried by a unanimous vote: AYES:
Armenta. C lark. i nw. V and ABSENT: Alarcon
Inc.
the Professional Services Agreement for Moore Iacofano Goltsman,
mendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Amendment
to the.,Professional Services Agreement for the GASP and EIR project
ii the pity of Rosemead and MIG. The amendments will be applied to the
3f Work, Schedule of Services, and Compensation (Attachment `B").
Interim Community Development Director Valenzuela explained the city executed
an agreement with MIG Inc. in 2014 for the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan and
Environmental Impact Report project. Several concerns were raised by Architect
Simon Lee on specific standards in the draft Garvey Avenue Specific Plan
document. As a result, the Ad Hoc Committee directed MIG Inc. to provide a
revised budget and schedule for the items discussed, which would cost
approximately $48,200 and delay the completion of the Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan by fourth months.
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes of August 8, 2017
Page 8 of 12
Brian Lewin, resident, expressed concerns with appropriating additional funds to
the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, considering the time spent on the specific plan
and cost. Furthermore, he expressed reservations on the proposed changes to the
buildings frontage percentage requirement from 75 percent to an optional 25 to 75
percent for mix use projects larger than one acre. He added, a core principal of the
specific plan was keeping cars and parking lots away from the public view and
creating a beautified frontage. He suggested the revised plan include verbiage to
require decorative elements to completely shield any parking from public view for
a minimum of 75 percent when combined with the structures and any project opting
for such approach would be subject to design review.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly explained an architect e
going through a pre application process for a
Mayor Low interjected the City b
Plan with areal project, therefore
minute concerns while
Vsted trying otit the Garvey Specific
the architect to exnrass some issues.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated wheel architect, Simon Lee submitted the project, he
realized there were significant issues which, conflicted with the Garvey Avenue
Specific Plan proposal. After consulting with; staff, the Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan Ad Hoc Committee 'decided to incorporate'spme of Mr. Lee's concerns. In
addition, there was frontage of;building concerns brought by Mr. Lee that would
decrease ingress and egress on lus',building site. Asa result, ingress and egress
would go on the residential side of the street which"would bottle neck traffic. By
reducing the frontage percentage, many issues were addressed in the specific plan.
Staff would continue to work with MIG Inc. to incorporate revisions.
Mayor LQwjeiteraW a long section" f Garvey Avenue would have projects pushed
towards the street, creating,a tunnel,effect. There should be a mixture of different
designs with decorative &iiiagee.
Councif'Me`rnber Armenta,.asked staff if the concerns shared by the architect had
been brouglTbefore to -the Ad -Hoc Committee initially, would there have been an
increase in
Development Director Valenzuela explained it was not until
his plans that MIG Inc. conducted a consistency check which
,en issues. The consistency check assisted staff in seeing some
needed to help future architects.
Council Member Armenta reiterated that if the concerns brought up by the architect
were ever brought up at the committee meetings, they could have been addressed.
City Manager Manis explained it was best to address issues during the initial
process rather than at the final stages of the specific plan. Staff was able to observe
how each element of the specific plan worked with the plans the architect
submitted, prompting staff to make observations.
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes of August 8, 2017
Page 9 of 12
Council Member Clark agreed with staff's recommendation since there are
different types of parcels all along Garvey Avenue and one size doesn't fit all.
ACTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Ly and seconded by Mayor Low to approve
Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement for the GASP and EIR
project between the City of Rosemead and MIG. The amendments will be applied
to the Scope of Work, Schedule of Services, and Compensation. Motion was carried
by a unanimous vote: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly and ABSENT: Alarcon
7. MATTERS FROM MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
A. Federal Public Affairs Advocacy and Grant Services Contract (Agendized by
Mayor Pro Tem Ly)
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council ' authorize the City
Manager to enter into a one-year agreement with David Turch &,Associates for
public affairs advocacy services, . in , an amount not to exceed $; 5'4,000 and
appropriate $54,000 from the General Fund unassigned fund balanga
Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated by hiring a public affairs advocacy firm, the City could
look for grants and fundiiigopportunities in Washington, D.C.
Council Member Armenta asked
would do, that differs from the fr
Mayor Pro Teni-Iy replied th
represents the City, of Rosemead
Associate's ;would rim -'resent the
type of work the new firm
rks with.
lobbying firm Gonzalvez and Son's,
ento only and the firm David Turch &
shington, D.C. only.
to the podium to speak about his firm.
David Torch; Qf Davrd T.urph & Associates explained they are an advocacy firm in
Washington,`D;C for the past 30 years representing clients from coast to coast. The
firm has stroworking relationships with members of Congress and Senators
which are important to reach the City's objectives. The firm operates with eight
emvlevees and subcontractors, which include four former members of congress.
ACTI'ON;;1Vloved by Mayor Pro Tem Ly and seconded by Council Member Clark
to authorize the City Manager to enter into a one-year agreement with David Torch
& Associates for public affairs advocacy services, in an amount not to exceed
$54,000; and appropriate the funds from the General Fund unassigned fund balance.
Motion was carried by a unanimous vote: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly and
ABSENT: Alarcon
B. City Council Comments
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes of August 8, 2017
Page 10 of 12
Council Member Armenta commended staff and volunteers for a successful
National Night Out event. In addition, recognized Public Safety Supervisor Wong
and volunteers who worked on the backpack giveaway.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated the flag at Garvey Center needed replacement and should
not be flown until a new flag is installed. Also, he spoke about bulky item issues
recurring and requested that a new program be put in place that could eliminate the
ongoing problem. Lastly, he requested staff look into a potential location for a dog
park to present to the Parks Commission at their first meeting.
Council Member Armenta asked for the shopping cart issues"to also be included in
the program.
City Manager Manis clarified there had been a' substantial. increase in bulky item
issues in the City and staff was working on "a"d`dressing ongol**ues. In addition,
a formal program could address specific bulky items concerns:"Lastly, staff had
identified two sites for a potential do park and would determine if, a budget would
be required.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly suggested if funding is needed, the new lobbying firm could
search for money for open=space.
Council Member Clark shared Congresswoman Judy' Chu recently honored her
collaborative group with a building bridges"award for working with the San Gabriel
Mountains National Monument:, Former President Obama declared the area a
national obfiumenf,and the current President is proposing to eliminate that
designation. Councit Member Clark stated she had opposed the monument due its
potential"effqct on our water supply,,frpm the San Gabriel River. But due to their
opposition,"she„ and gthers were asked to serve on a collaborative. We have
representative§ -",from mariy: points of view and have worked together as a
collaborative group along with the national forest for 2 1/z years regarding the
monument. The collaborative group is determined to keep the monument and hopes
Congress does:not eloso,,tl e monument.
Council Membe Armenta reported the traffic left hand turn signal light westbound
side"of ValleyBooulevard and Temple City Boulevard was dim and asked staff to
inspect,the,signal. She also expressed concerns with the esthetics of the area
between,fhe" City of Rosemead and El Monte. She explained you can see the
difference when leaving the City of El Monte and entering Rosemead. She
requested staff to look in to finding ways to assist local businesses in beautifying
their properties. Lastly, she asked staff to speak to Target about their shopping cart
locking mechanism.
City Manager Manis stated he had spoken to the Target store manager regarding
the shopping cart issue.
Mayor Low recessed the meeting to closed session at 8:3lp.m. and reconvened the
meeting at 8:53 p.m.
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes of August 8, 2017
Page 11 of 12
City Attorney Richman reported out from closed session that the City Council took
the follow vote 3-1, with Council Member Alarcon absent, to give a performance
evaluation of 3.6 to the City Clerk.
Council Member Armenta noted she voted no because she felt more development
was needed.
8. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned in memory of Brent Witham and Pfc. Ruben Velasco at 8:54 p.m.
The next regular City Council meeting is scheduled to take place on September 12, 2017,
at 7:00 p.m. in the Rosemead City Hall Council Chamber.:
City
APPROVED:
Polly Low,
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to
the Rosemead Community Development Commission Joint Meeting
Minutes of August 8, 2017
Page 12 of 12