Ordinance No. 126 - Annexation Area No. 23•
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ORDINANCE NO. 126
0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED "CITY
OF ROSEMEAD ANNEXATION AREA NO. 23" TO
THE CITY OF RuSEIZAD.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, on the 18th day of October, 1963, the
City Council of the City of Rosemead on its own motion initiated
proceedings for the annexation of certain uninhabited territory
to the City of Rosemead; and
WHEREAS, on the 18th day of October, 1963, the
Council of the City of Rosemead did pass and adopt Resolution
No. 63-61, giving notice of the proposal to annex said unin-
habited territory to the City of Rosemead, said territory
being therein designated as 'City of Rosemead Annexation Area
No. 23," which resolution described the boundaries of the
territory so proposed to be annealed to said City; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 63-61 did contain a
notice of the hour, day and place when and where the said
I, Council of said City would hear protests made by any person
owning real property within the territory proposed to be
annexed, the time of said 'caring burg not less than forty
nor more than sixty days from the date of passage of said
resolution; and
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of December, 1963, at
8:00 o'clock P.M. of said day, at 8815 East Valley Boulevard,
City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, State of California,
said time and place being the day and hour and place fixed in
said Resolution No. 63-61 for hearing protests to the said
annexation, the said Council of said City did hear and pass upon
all protests made to said proposed annexation and did find and
declare by resolution.that protests to said proposed annexation
had not been made by public and private owners of one-half of
the value of said territory proposed to be anne--_d; and
WHEREAS, said City Council duly elected to pro-
ceed with said annexation, and after considering the views and
wishes of the property owners concerned, made certain changes
in the boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed as
the City Council found to be proper, which changes did not
include any territory outside c': the boundaries esE~scribed in
said resolution giving notice of the proposed annexation, and
did not diminish the lard area of the territory proposed to be
annexed by more than five per cent (Si.); and
WHEREAS, said boundaries as so changed are
described in Exhibit "A" hereto attached, incorporated herein
and made a part hereof by reference; and
WHEREAS, said territory is contiguous to the City
of Rosemead and is uninhabited territory in the County of Los
Angeles,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of
Rosemead does hereby approve the annexation to the City of
• 0
Rosemead of said territory described in Exhibit "A" hereto,
and does hereby ordain that said territory be and it hereby
is, annexed to the City of Rosemead.
day
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this,_:7,f
of January, 1964.
ROFT CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ATTEST:
CI CLERK
.40
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 23
TO THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AS AMENDED
All that jSropArty lh".the County cif Los Angeles, State
bf`Catifornia, bouNdeii and described as.,follows:
Beginning lht an.ah9 a pain, fn the southerly boundary of
the ft bf Rosembtl as said boun ary existed on October 16, 1963,
s218 aH~Ii point bettlg.,the southwesterly corn r_,of Lot 6 of Tract
No:. 83d, a5 per m8p Pecdrded In 8odk;16 Aa a17 of Maps, in the
o f,.ice'of the Cbuhiy RdcoFd6r df.sald Coun yy : kehte.:sbuthwesterly
6 ong the southeasterly line of Tract No. 4146, as pe.r ftp ee-
corded in Book 310 pages 25 through 27, inclusive;. bf Pupil; in
the office of said Recorder, to the center line of K1lrigehmaH
Street, 60 feet wide, as shown on map of said Tract No. 14146;
thence westerly along said center line of Klingerman Street and
the westerly prolongation thereof, to the southeasterly corner
of Tract No. 14448, as per map recorded in Book 314 pages 27 and
28, of Maps, in the office of said Recorder; thence westerly
along the southerly line of said Tract No. 14448 and which is
also along the southerly line of Klingerman Street, 30 feet wide,
as shown on the map of said Tract No. 14448, to the southwesterly
corner of said Tract No. 14448; thence southerly 20 feet along
the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of said Tract
No. 14448 to the northerly line of Lot A of Tract No. 1942, as
per map recorded in Book 21 page 179 of Maps, in the office of
said Recorder; thence westerly along said last mentioned northerly
line to the easterly line of Lot 7 of Richard Garvey's Addition
No. 2, as per map recorded in Book 70 pages 69 through 71, in-
clusive, of Miscellaneous Records in the office of said Recorder;
thence northerly along said easterly line to the northeasterly
corner of said Lot 7; thence westerly along the northerly line
of said Lot 7, to the easterly line of Tract No. 4610, as per
map recorded in Book 93, pages 12 and 13, of Maps, in the office
of said Recorder; thence southerly along said easterly line of
Tract No. 4610 and along the easterly line of Angelus Avenue,
30 feet wide, as shown on said map of Tract No. 4610, to the
northerly line of Lot 8 of said Richard Garvey's Addition No. 2;
thence westerly along said last mentioned northerly line to the
northwesterly corner of said Lot 8; thence southerly along the
westerly line of said Lot 8 and along the easterly line of Tract
No. 7123, as per map recorded in Book 82, pages 72 through 74,
• inclusive, of Maps, in the office of said Recorder, to the south-
east corner of Lot 127 of said Tract No. 7123; thence easterly
along the easterly prolongation of the northerly line of Keim
Street, 50 feet wide, as shown on map of said Tract No. 7123, a
distance of 263 feet to a line which is parallel with said
westerly line of Lot 8; thence southerly along said last mentioned
parallel line and the southerly prolongation thereof, to the
southerly line of Rush Street 60 feet wide, as shown on County
Surveyors Map No. B-384 Sheet 1, on file in the office of the
Engineer of said County; thence westerly along the southerly
line of Rush Street to the northwest corner of Lot 6 of Tract
No. 701, as per map recorded in Book 16, pages 110 and 111, of
Maps, in the office of said Recorder; thence southerly along the
westerly line of said last mentioned Lot 6 to the southwest
corner of said Lot 6; thence easterly in a direct line to the
southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence easterly in a direct
line to the northwesterly corner of Lot 15 of said Tract No. 701;
thence southerly in a direct line to the southwesterly corner
of said Lot 15; thence easterly in a direct line to the northwest-
erly corner of Lot 23 of said Tract N0.701; thence southerly
along the westerly line of said Lot 23 and along the westerly
line of Lot 34 of said Tract No. 701 to the southwest corner of
said Lot 34; thence easterly along the northerly line of Tract
No. 26931, as per map recorded in Book No. 688 pages 39 and 40
EXHIBIT "A"
0
F
ANNEXATION. NO. 23 AS AMENDED
of Maps, in the office of said Recorders to the northwesterly.
corner of Lot 4 of said Tract No. 26931; thence southerly in a
direct line to the southwesterly corner:,of said last mentioned
Lot 4;, thence southerly in,a direct line to the northwesterly
corner of.Lat 21 of said .Tract No. 26931; thence southerly in a
direc.t;.line to the southwesterly. . corner of,,said Lot 21 thence,
easterly along "the southerly line of said Tract No. 26931 to
the easterly line of Lot 41 of said.Tract No. 701 and, which Js
the westerly line of Walnut Grove Avenue, 60 'feet wide; thence
southerly 174.84 feet along the easterly line of said Lot.41 to .
the center. line of a private street known as La Madrina Drive,
40 feet wide; thence westerly along said last mentioned center
lime and along a line parallel with, and distant northerly,
174.84 feet, measured at right angles, from the southerly line
of said Lot 41 to the westerly line of the easterly 382.85 feet
of said Lot 41; thence southerly along said last mentioned line:
to the southerly line of said Lot 41; thence,'westerly along said
Fast mentioned southerly line to the easterly line of. Tract
No. 8646, as per map recorded in"Book 179 page 21, of Maps, in
the office of said Recorder; thence northerly in a direct line..
to the northeasterly corner of said Tract.No. 8646; `thence west-.,
erly in a 'direct line to the northwesterly corner of said Tract.
No. 8646; thence southerly along the westerly and northwesterly
boundary of said Tract No. 8646 to the northeasterly line of. .
San Gabriel Boulevard;, 95 feet wide, as shown on County Surveyors
Map No. B-144 Sheet 2, on file in,.the office of the Engineer of
said County;.thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line
o,f.San Gabriel Boulevard to the northeasterly prolongation. of the
northwesterly line of Lot 56 of said Tract No. 701; thence south'-
weste.rly along said last mentioned northeasterly prolongation_...
and along said northwesterly line of Lot 56 to the northerly
line of Arroyo Dr'ive,`as said Arroyo Drive is shown..on County
Surveyors'Map-No. B-191 Sheet 10, on file in the office of the
Engineer of said County; thence easterly, northerly and southeast-
erly along said northerly line of Arroyo Drive to the.northwest-`
erly line of Lot 54 of said Tract No. 701; thence northeasterly
along said last mentioned northwesterly line and the northeast-
erly prolongation thereof to the south- 3sterly line of Lot 49
of said Tract No. 701 and which is also'-the northeasterly line
of said San Gabriel Boulevard; thence southeasterly: in a direct
line to the most westerly corner of Lot 50 of said Tract N6.-701;,
thence northeasterly in a direct line to the most northerly
corner of said Lot 50; thence southeasterly along the northeast-
erly line of said Lot 50 to the westerly line of the easterly
208.71 feet of Lot 48.of said Tract No. 701; thence northerly
along said last mentioned line 387.81 feet to a line which is
at right angles to the easterly line of said Lot 48; thence
easterly along said last described line 208.71 feet to the east-.
erly line of said Lot 48; thence northerly.i,n a direct line to
the northeasterly corner of said Lot 48; thence westerly in a
direct line to the southeast corner,of Lot 45 of said Tract No.
701; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot 45 to
the northeasterly line of said San Gabriel Boulevard; thence.
northwesterly along said last mentioned northeasterly line 10.30
feet to the easterly line of Walnut Grove Avenue, 60 feet wide;
thence northwesterly in a direct line to the most southerly
corner of Lot 44 of said Tract No. 701; thence northwesterly
along the southwesterly line of said Lot 44'and along the north-
easterly line of said San Gabriel.Boulevard to the westerly line
of the easterly 296.42 feet of said Lot 44; thence northerly
along said last mentioned westerly line to a line which is at
right angles to the easterly line of said Lot 44 and passes
through a point in said easterly line of Lot 44, 'distant south-
erly 320 feet from the northeasterly corner of said Lot 44;
thence easterly along said last described line to said easterly
line of Lot 44; thence northerly along said easterly line 320
feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 44; thence easterly in
- 2 -
EXHIBIT "A"
J'i <
ANNtXA710N N0; 23 AS AMENI)tD
a.dttect line to the southwesterly corner of.Lot 40 of said
Tract No. 701; thence easterly along the southerly line of said
Lot 46 to the easterly line of the westerly 315 feet of said
Lot 40; thence northerly along said last mentioned easterly
line to the northerly line of the south half of said Lot 40j,
thence westerly along said last mentioned northerly line to the
easterly line of the westerly 125 feet of said Lot 40; thence
northerly along said last mentioned easterly line 165 feet,
more or less to the southerly line of the northerly 165 feet
of said Lot +0; thence westerly along said last mentioned south-
erly line to the westerly line of said Lot 40; thence northerly
along said westerly line of Lot 40 to the easterly prolongation
of the northerly line of Drayer Lane, 54 feet wide, as shown on
said map of Tract No. 26931; thence westerly along said easterly
prolongation and said northerly line of Drayer Lane to the south-
westerly corner of Lot 1 of said Tract No. 26931; thence norther-
ly in a direct line to the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence
easterly along the northerly line of said Tract No. 26931 to
the southeast corner of Lot 34 of said Tract No. 701; thence
northerly in a direct line to the northeast corner of said Lot
34; thence northerly in a direct line to the northeast corner of
Lot 23 of said Tract No. 701; thence northerly in a direct line
to the northeast corner of Lot 16 of said Tract No. 701; thence
easterly in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 3 of
said Tract No. 701; thence easterly in a direct line to the
southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence northerly in a direct
line to the northeast corner of said Lot 3; thence northerly in
a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot A of Tract No. 3260,
as per map recorded in Book 34 page 21, of Maps, in the office
of said Recorder; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly
line of said last mentioned Lot A to the northerly line of Lot 28
of Tract No. 830, as per map recorded in Book 16, page 117, of
Maps, in the office of said Recorder; thence easterly in a direct
line to the northeasterly corner of said Lot 28 of Tract No. 830;
thence easterly in a direct line to the northeasterly corner of
Lot 29 of said Tract No. 830; thence northerly in a direct line
to the northeasterly corner of Lot 27 of said Tract No. 830;
thence northerly in a direct line to the southeasterly corner of
Lot 16 of said Tract No. 830; thence northerly in a direct line
to the northeasterly corner of said Lot 16; thence easterly in
a direct line to the northeasterly corner of Lot 17 of said
Tract No. 830; thence easterly in a direct line to the north-
westerly corner of Lot 18 of said Tract No. 830; thence easterly
along the northerly line of said Lot 18 to an angle point in the
southerly boundary of the City of Rosemead, as said boundary
existed on October 16, 1963; thence northwesterly, northerly and
westerly along the.boundary of the City of Rosemead, as said
boundary existed on October 16, 1963, to the point of beginning.
-3-
EXHIBIT "A"