CC - Item 3C - Staff Report AB 1475 r fly
�¢ �. �� ' st of
ff,eport
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL t
CJ A
FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 2, 1999
RE: RESOLUTION NO. 99-27- SUPPORTING AB 1475 (SOTO) CREATING A
COMPETITIVE STATEWIDE GRANT PROGRAM FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS
IN AN EFFORT TO INCREASE BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AROUND
SCHOOLS
Attached for your consideration is a letter from Assemblymember Nell Soto requesting the
Council's support for AB 1475. The bill will target as much as $20 million a year statewide to
assist local efforts to increase bike and pedestrian safety around schools. The Bill would require
that Caltrans establish and administer a "Safe Routes to School" Program and use Federal funds
to do so. Also attached is a copy of the bill and the latest analysis.
RECOMMENDATION
If the City Council is in support of the Legislation, it would be appropriate to adopt Resolution
No. 99-27 and direct the City Clerk to make the necessary notificaitons.
FGT:js
Attachment COUNCIL AGENDA
JUN 081999
ITEM No. C
J
RESOLUTION NO. 99-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
TO SUPPORT AB 1475 (SOTO) CREATING A COMPETITIVE STATEWIDE
GRANT PROGRAM FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS, IN AN EFFORT TO
INCREASE BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AROUND SCHOOLS
WHEREAS, AB 1475 (Soto) would require Caltrans to establish and administer a "Safe Routes
to School" Program using Federal Funds(Transportation Equity Act of the 2I st
Century(TEA-21), for bicycle and pedestrian safety, and traffic calming measures
(i.e., commuter shortcuts, speeding motorists, traffic spillover in residential
communities, etc.);
WHEREAS, the bill would require Caltrans to make grants available to entities based on the
results of a statewide competition that requires the submission of proposals for
funding. The proposals would then be rated on all of the following factors:
1. The demonstrated needs of the applicant;
2. The potential of the proposal to reduce child injuries and fatalities;
3. The potential of the proposal that encourages increased walking and
bicycling of students;
4. Completion of a "Safe Routes to School" plan that requires the
identification of safety hazards, current and potential walking and bicycling
routes to school and the involvement of students, parents, teachers, local
transportation agencies, law enforcement agencies, and school officials in
the development of the Plan.
WHEREAS, the bill would also require Federal transportation funds to be made available for use in
approximately equal amounts on state highways, local roads, and approved projects;
WHEREAS, AB 1475 provides an opportunity for the City to develop a comprehensive program
that provides for the peace and safety of bicycle riders, school children, and
pedestrians. The successful award of funds for such a program will reduce the use
of General Fund monies to help enhance the quality of life for residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Rosemead hereby supports
AB 1475 (Soto) which would create a competitive grant program that helps to increase bike and
pedestrian safety around schools, and traffic calming measures.
PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1999.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
STATE CAPITOL
MEMBER,COMMITTEES
MITTEES ON:
POBOX 9421349 llcAs22pmn y •AGING AND LONG TERM CARE ARE
SACRAMENTO,CA 94249-0001 •EDUCATION
(916) 021 GOVERNMENTAL• ORGANIZATION
FAX pm)31FCalifornia `SQvtzIa±urP •LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DISTRICT OFFICE
TRANSPORTATION
304 - `,
WEST F 62
ONTARIO,(9 )9 CA- 91762 i EI"1
(909)9)9-4-66 ]- ,
FAX(909)984£696
NELL SOTO
ASSEMBLYMEMBER,SIXTY-FIRST DISTRICT
May 11, 1999
TO: California Mayors
FR: Assemblymember Nell Soto
T_ am writing to request your city's support for AB 1475 - the Safe Routes to School
Bill of 1999. This bill will be on the Assembly Floor in a few weeks. This critical
legislation will target as much as $20 million a year statewide to assist local efforts to
make it safer for kids to walk and bicycle to schools all across California. The bill
raises no new taxes, gives local governments and the public more local control over
federal transportation safety dollars, and will help prevent needless deaths and injuries
to the thousands of California schoolchildren who walk and bicycle to school.
This issue has been a matter of great concern to local elected officials due to increased
traffic in communities throughout California. It is simply not safe to allow children to
walk or bike to school anymore, a fact that is reflected in trends that show that fewer
and fewer children do.
It is critically important that we once again make our streets safe for school children.
We must slow the speed of traffic in neighborhoods, improve sidewalks and
crosswalks, add bicycle lanes on streets and create neighborhood bicycle and pedestrian
trails and greenways. These objectives are critical to the safety, economic vitality and
quality of life of communities across the state.
Already, more than 50 organizations are supporters of AB 1475, including the
California PTA, the cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, Santa Rosa, Auburn, and San
Francisco, Association of California School Administrators, California Center for
Child Injury Prevention, California Teachers Association, the American Planning
Association, and regional transportationagencies in the Bay Area, Santa Cruz County,
and Sonoma County.
I ask for the support of your city by the adoption of a resolution similar to those
enclosed. Nearly every city in this state has experienced the tragedy of having a child's
life cut short due to unsafe streets and dangerous routes to school. I hope you will join
me in working to prevent such tragedies in the future. If you adopt a resolution,
would you please send a copy to my office in Sacramento. Thank you for your help.
Mme,
Rented on Recycled Paper
AB1475 SUPPORTERS
Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission
Association of Bay Area Governments
Sonoma County
Transportation Authority
Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission
Local Government Commission
City of Los Angeles
City and County of San Francisco
City of Oakland
City of Santa Rosa
City of Auburn
City of Poway
County of Marin
California Parent Teachers Association
Association of California School Administrators
California Center for Child Injury Prevention
California Coalition for Children ' s Safety and Health
California Teachers Association
Latino issues Forum
West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee
Emergency Nurses Association - East Bay Chapter
San Francisco PTA
San Francisco Pedestrian Safety
Task Force
Oakland Pedestrian Safety Program
Los Angeles Unified School District
United Teachers of Les Angeles
Local Initiatives Support Corporation (Los Angeles)
Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative
LEARN - Los Angeles Educational Alliance for Restructuring
Now
Lagunitas Unified School DistrioL
(Marin County)
American Lung Association
Surface Transportation Policy Project
California Bicycle Coalition
Planning and Conservation League
Urban Habitat Program
(San Francisco Bay Area)
California Rails to Trails Conservancy
Sustainable El Cerrito
(San Francisco Bay Area)
Sierra Club
Environmental Defense Fund
L.A. Walks
Walk Sacramento
Bikeable Communities Inc.
Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition
LIN 32 '99 12:3t=N GONSALVES & SON 0.b 9
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 28, 1999
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-t999-2000 REGULAR SESSION
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1475
Introduced by Assembly Member Soto
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Villaraigosa)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aroner, Davis, Dutra, Kuehl,
Lampert, Longville, Scott, Strom-Martin, and Wiggins)
(Coauthor: Senator Johnston)
February 26, 1999
An act to amend Sections 2331 and 2333 of, and to add
Section 2333.5 to, the Streets and Highways Code, relating to
highways.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1475, as amended, Soto. Highways; Safe Routes tO
School program.
Existing law requires that certain federal transportation
funds received by the state be spent on specified
transportation programs authorized under federal law. The
funds are required to be made available for use in
approximately equal amounts on state highways and on local
roads.
This bill would require the Department of Transportation
to establish and administer a "Safe Routes to School" program
pursuant to authority granted under specified federal law and
to use federal transportation funds for construction of bicycle
and pedestrian safety and traffic calming tom:._
JUN 02 la:31PI9 GONSPLVES & SON
r
AB 1475 —2—
The bill would require the deparunent to make grants
available to etztities local governmental agencies under the
program based on the results of a statewide competition that
requires submission of proposals for funding and rates those
proposals on specified factors.
The bill world require the specified federal transportation
funds to be made available for use in approximately equal
amounts on state highways, local roads, and the program that
the bill would create.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1 SECTION 1. Section 2331 , of the Streets and
2 Highways Code is amended to read:
3 2331. The Highway Safety Act of 1973 (Title II of P.L.
4 93-87, 87 Stat. 250) hasauthorized appropriations for a
5 number of programs relating to projects for the
6 improvement of highway safety , and the reduction of
7 traffic congestion. Such programs consist of the
8 rail-highway crossings program. (Section 203 of the
9 Highway Safety Act of 1973), the pavement marking
10 demonstration program (Sec. 151. Title 23, U.S.C.);
11 projects for high-hazard locations, including, but not
12 limited to, projects for bicycle and pedestrian safety and
13 traffic calming measures inthose locations (Sec. 152, Title
14 23, U.S.C.); program for the elimination of roadside
15 obstacles (Sec. 153, Title 23, U.S.C.); and the federal-aid
16 safer roads demonstration program (Sec. 405, Title 23, •
17 U.S.C.). The purposeof this chapter is to implement these
18 programs in this state. The commission, the department,
19 boards of supervisors, and city councils are authorized to
20 do all things necessary in their respective jurisdictions to
21 secure and expend suchfederal funds in accordance with
22 the intent of the federal act and of this chapter.
23 SEC. 2. Section 2333 of the Streets and Highways
24 Code is amended to read:
25 2333. In each annual proposed budget prepared
26 pursuant to Section 165, there shall be included an
9E
JUN 92 '99 12:32P11 GONSPLVES & SON
—3 — AB 1475
1 amount equal to the estimated apportionment available
2 from the federal government. for the programs described
3 in Sections 2331 and 2333.5. The commission may allocate
4 a portion of those funds each year for use on city streets
5 and county roads. It is the intent of the Legislature that
6 the commission allocate the total amount received from
7 the federal government for all of the programs described
8 in Sections 2331 and 2333.5 in a manner that, over a period
9 of five years, makes those funds available for use in
10 approximately equal amounts on state highways , local
11 roads, and the program established under Section 2333.5.
12 In addition, it is the intent of the Legislature that the
73 commission shall apportion for use, in financing the
14 railroad grade separation program described in Section
15 190, a substantial portionof the funds received pursuant
16 to the federal rail-highway crossings program.
17 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the share of
18 any railroad of the cost of maintaining railroad crossing
19 protection facilities funded, in whole or in part, by funds
20 described in Section 2331 shall be the same share it would
21 be if no federal funds were involved and the crossing
22 protection facilities were funded pursuant to an order of
23 the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Section 1202
24 of the Public Utilities Code; and in case of dispute, the
25 Public Utilities Commission shall determine that share
26 pursuant to this section.
27 SEC. 3. Section 2333.5 is added to the Streets and
28 Highways Code, to read:
29 2333.5. (a) The department. .shall establish and
30 administer a "Safe Routes: to School" program pursuant
31 to the authority granted under Section 152 of Title 23 of
32 the United States Code te—and shall use federal
33 transportation funds for construction of bicycle and
34 pedestrian safety and traffic calming-measures-projects.
35 (b) The department shall make grants available to
36 entities—local governmental agencies under the program
37 based on the results ofa statewide competition that
38 requires submission of proposals for funding and rates
39 those proposals on all of the following factors:
40 (1) Demonstrated needs of the applicant.
98
P
•
•
JUN 02 '59 i2:32PM GONSPLVES & SON P.5/3
/ AB 1,475 —4-
1 (2) Potential of the proposal for reducing child injuries
2 and fatalities.
3 (3) Potential of the proposal for encouraging
4 increased walking and bicycling among students.
5 (9) Cemplct e.. of a "Safi. Re...er. to School" Fla.. that
6
7 (A}
8 (4) Identification of safety hazards. •
9 (I3)
10 (5) Identification of current and potential walking and
11 bicycling routes to school.
12
13 (6) Consultation and support for projects by students,
14 parents, teachers, local transportation agencies, law
15 enforcement agencies, and school officials.
•
•
O
9A
JUN 02 '99 12:22Pr1 GONSgLVES & SON
ab 1475
aapp
19990428
Date of Hearing: April 28,1999
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Carole Migden. Chairwoman
AB 1475 (Soto) - As Introduced: February 26,1999
Policy Committee: Transportation Vote: 12-5
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY:
This bill requires Caltrans to establish a "Safe Routes to School (SRS)"
program whereby federal transportation funds are granted to local entities to
improve student safety from traffic around schools, as follows:
1) Changes the 50/50 split between state and local entities for the
$58 million annually apportioned from the federal Hazard
Elimination/Safety (HES) program to a 1/3each split for state, locals.
and the SRS Program.
2) Explicitly makes projects for bicycle and pedestrian safety and
traffic calming around schools eligible for HES funding under the
federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century (TEA-21 ).
FISCAL EFFECT. •
1) Annually earmarks $19.3 million of federal HES funds to the SRS
program. (Federal Funds.)
2) Annually reduces HES funding to state and local entities for other
HES purposes by $9.7 million each. (Federal Funds.)
COMMENTS:
1) Rationale. The bits sponsors, the Surface Transportation Policy
Project and the California Bicycle Ccalition, argue that a larger
share of existing transportation funding needs to be earmarked to
improve student safety on the streets and sidewalks around schools.
They note that California ranks 12th among states in child pedestrian
fatality rates and that the second leading cause of death for children
5-12 is being hit by a car while walking.
JUN 02 '99 12:23PM CONSALVES s SON
2) Cost Effectiveness. The American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials has determined that improved pedestrian
safety projects are relatively cost effective means of improving
safety with a benefit to cost ratio about six times greater than that
of traditional highway safety improvement projects.
Analysis Prepared by: Steve Archibald 1 APPR. 1(916)319-2081
SUN OE '99 1E:33PM GONSRLVES Z SON
STATUS
CA AB 1475 AUTHOR: Soto Vil:araigosa
TITLE: Highways: Safe Routes to School program
FILE: 171
LOCATION: Assembly Third Reading File
SUMMARY:
Requires the Department of Transportation to establish and
administer a Safe Routes to School program pursuant to authority
granted under specified federal law and to use federal
transportation funds for construction of bicycle and pedestrian •
safety and traffic calming projects.
STATUS:
02/26/1999 INTRODUCED.
03/18/1999 To ASSEMBLY Committee on TRANSPORTATION.
04/12/1999 From ASSEMBLY Committee on TRANSPORTATION: Do pass
to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS.
04/28/1999 In ASSEMBLY Committee on APPROPRIATIONS: To Suspense
File.
05/26/1999 From ASSEMBLY Committee on APPROPRIATIONS- Do pass
as amended.
05/28/1999 In ASSEMBLY. Read second time and amended. To
second reading.
06/01/1999 In ASSEMBLY. Read second time. To third reading.