Loading...
CC - Item 4B - Approval of Tract Map 52529-3414 Eckhart Avenue; Acceptance of Grant Deed for Drainage Easement - 8119 Hellman Avenue 5 T F O'or \c, stat fep ort TO: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER # FROM: KEN RUKAVINA, CITY ENGINEER DATE: MAY 5, 1999 RE: APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP 52629 - 3414 ECKHART AVENUE; ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FOR DRAINAGE EASEMENT - 8119 HELLMAN AVENUE Attached is a copy of Tract Map No. 52629, plans for the proposed street improvements, Undertaking Agreement, Letter of Credit in lieu of Improvement Bond, and a copy of the Planning Commission's conditions of approval. The City Engineer has determined that conditions of the Planning Commission have been met or bonded for and the map is ready for Council's approval. Also attached is a Grant of Easement for drainage purposes, ingress, egress, construction of storm drain appurtenances and maintenance at 8119 Hellman Avenue. The easement dedication is being submitted as a required of Conditions of Approval for the subject tract map. Currently, Danna Court drains onto private property and development of the subject ' tract map redistributes drainage in the area. Therefore, this dedication is required to allow storm flows from Danna Court and the new subdivision to drain to an acceptable outlet (Hellman Avenue)via a dedicated drainage easement across 8119 Hellman Avenue,which abuts the rear of the proposed subdivision. COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 111999 ITEM No. 1L. CCB K May 5, 1999 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve Tract Map No. 52629. 2. Approve the Undertaking Agreement. 3. Accept the Drainage Easement. 4. Direct the City Clerk to arrange for the recordation of Tract Map 52629 and the Storm Drain Easement Deed, together with the Certification of Acceptance. Attachment 0 800 Wes!6th Street General Bank 01�F.Valley Blvd. Los Angeles,CA 90017CD cAlhambra.CA 91801 TLX-166455 GDC UT '{{g� Far 1616)284-4632 SWIFT:GBCBU562 !� � IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO.: . DATE OF ISSUE: • SD995026A April 26, 1999 • 'ADVISING BANK APPLICANT . - Everland Inc - y r` 1807-A South San Gabriel • ' �;San Gabriel, CA 91776 BENEFICIARY • AMOUNT UP To $157,300.00(Om,bwe n1 City of Rosemead „ g - • fifty stye,'N,vuamtd mid G.L.banditti 1100 ..a Rosemead, Ca 91770 EXPIRY DATE Anil 26, 2000 EXPIRY PLACE, Gentlemen r This Letter of Credit is given to fulfill the requirements of the City of Rosemead, hereinafter called the"City",and Everland Inc. hereinafter called the"Principal",covering certain street improvement on 3414 Eckhart Ave.Rosemead, Ca 91770. As required by the City, General Bank,hereinafter called the "Bank", does hereby establish in favor of the City, and for the account of Principal, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. SD995026A in the amount of$157,500 insuring payment of street improvement to be paid by drafts at sight on the principal if accompanied by the following documents: The City's written statement, signed by the City Engineer, or the Clerk of the City, certifying that there has been non- performance of duties on the said works on the said project in the amount accompanying a sight draft on us and that the amount of this draft is therefore now due and payable. -. Any monies received pursuant to this Letter of Credit shall be used for the installation of, and payment for, said required improvements and for performance of all terms of aforesaid costs and reasonable attorney's fee, incurred by the City of Rosemead in successfully enforcing subject obligation to be awarded and fixed by the court, and be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgement therein rendered. It is agreed that the above funds are on deposit in a separate fund and guaranteed for payment, and said fund shall become a trust fund for the purpose set forth herein as required by Sections 66499 through 66499.10 of the Government Code ofthe State of California. All drafts under this Letter of Credit shall be marked: Drawn Under General Bank: 1420 East Valley Blvd.,Alhambra,CA 91801 For the account of Everland Inc. Irrevocable Letter of Credit No.: SD995026A - This Letter of Credit expires one year from the date hereof and shall be deemed automatically extended without amendment for a one-year period upon such date and upon each anniversary of such date, unless at least sixty (60) days prior to such date or each anniversary of such date we notify the City Clerk in writing by certified mail that we elect not to so extend this Letter of Credit. Upon receipt by City of such notice City may automatically draw the full amount remaining on this Letter of Credit by a clean draft, with no supporting documents,and Bank will pay City upon Receipt of such draft. Principal expressly agrees with you that all drafts drawn under and in compliance with the teens of the Letter of Credit shall meet with due honor upon presentation. Except so far as otherwise expressly slatedels documentary credit is subject to the Uniform customs and Practice for Documentary Cretins'(1993 Revision) International ADVISING BANK S NOTIFICATION: Chamber of Commerce Publication No.500. We hertnY engage with drawers arm:or bone lids holders mat drafts drawn and negotiated In conformity w n the terms of This Credit will ee duly honored on presentation- he amount of each draft must be enoorsed on the reverse of Ime credit by the negolrabng bank / ALL BANKING CHARGES OUTSIDE GESERAL BANK.LOB ANGELES.CALIFORNIA ARE FOR ACCOUNT OF THE BENEFICIARY _. J Irl Amndazad sgnawren9 Ret.No..Place.Date,Name&Signature of the Advising Bank- RE 4DD R 94l iPR. -15' 991T1W) 11.14 CIT1 OF ROSEMEAD TEL:818-30--9218 P. 00? CITY OF ROSEMEAD UNDERTAKING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered this day of ,19 by, and between the CITY OF ROSEMEAD.State of California,acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as'CITY'and EVERLAND INC. (NAME) 1807-A S. San Gabriel Blvd. , San Gabriel Ca 91776 (ADDRESS) hereinafter called the 'CONTRACTOR.' WITNESSETH: FIRST: The CONTRACTOR, for and in consideration of the approval of the final map of that certain land division known as hereby agrees, at the CONTRACTOR'S own cost and expense to furnish all labor, materials,and equipment necessary to perform and complete.and within twenty-four(24) months from the date of filing of said map, to perform and complete in a good and timely manner, the following work,to wit: Construction of all streets.highways and publicways,sanitary sewerage and drainage facilities,fences, underground utilities, installation of street signs, street lights, water system, setting of survey monuments and all related facilities, and such other improvements required by the ordinances of the • City of Rosemead. Said work shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and shall not deemed complete until approved and accepted as completed by the City Council of the CITY. The estimated cost to do all work and furnish all materials necessary to complete the work in accordance with plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer is as shown on Attachment'A.' SECOND: The CITY shall not nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss, or damage happening or occurring to the work specified in this agreement prior to the completion and approval of same; nor shall the CITY, nor any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason of the nature of said work, or by reason of the acts or omissions of the CONTRACTOR his agents, or employees, in performances of said work. All of said APR -15' 991THUI I1 :14 CITY OF ROSEMEAD TEL:818-307-9118 R 003 liabilities shall be assumed by the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR further agrees to protect and hold harmless the CITY, its officers, and employees, in performance of said work. All of said liabilities shall be assumed by the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR further agrees to protect and hold harmless the CITY, its officers, and employees,from any and all claims.demands,causes of action, liability,or loss of any sort because of.or arising out of,the acts or omissions of the CONTRACTOR, his agents,and employees,in the performance of this agreement,or arising out of the use of any patent or patented article, in the performance of said agreement. THIRD: The CONTRACTOR hereby grants to the CITY,its agents and employees, irrevocable permission to enter upon the lands of the subject land division for the purpose of completing the work- This permission shall terminate in the event that the CONTRACTOR has completed the work within the time specified or any extension thereof granted by the City Council. FOURTH: It is further agreed that the CONTRACTOR shall have the control of the ground reserved for the installation of said work and the streets in which they are to be placed,as is necessary to allow him to cany out this agreement. FIFTH:Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement.CONTRACTOR shall file with the CITY anlnevocable Letter of Credit in an amount of One Hundred Fifty- Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars(S157,500.00)to guarantee faithful performance of all the provisions of this Agreement and for the payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing material in connection with this Agreement If the Letter of Credit, in the opinion of the CITY,becomes insufficient,CONTRACTOR agrees to replenish said Letter of Credit within ten(10)days of receiving notice that said Letter of Credit Is insufficient. SIXTH: If the CONTRACTOR neglects, refuses,or falls to prosecute the work with such diligence as to ensure its completion within the time specified, or within such extensions of said time as have been granted by the City Council,or tithe CONTRACTOR violates or neglects, refuses, or fails to perform satisfactorily any of the provisions of the plans and specifications, he shall be in default of this agreement and notice in writing of such default shall be served upon him and upon any Surety in connection with this con- tract. The City Council shall have the power,on recommendation of the City Engineer,to terminate all rights of the CONTRACTOR or his Surety then existing or which thereafter occur bemuse of such default The determination by the City Engineer of the question as to whether any of the terms of the contract or specifications have been violated,or have not been performed satisfactorily,shall be conclusive upon the CONTRACTOR,his Surety. and any and all other parties who may have any interest in the contract or any portion thereof. The foregoing provisions of this section shall be in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the CITY under law. SEVENTH: In case suit is brought upon this contract,the CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to pay to the CITY a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court VO'd 66c0 Lb9 DIG s-iaaur6u3 uuewrar yl d£b= i0 66-Si - +dy APR. -15 991TH1F1 II 14 CITY OF ROSEMEAD TEL./US-SOT-921S P. 004 EIGHTH: it Is further agreed by and between the parties hereto, including the Surety or Sureties on any Bond attached to this contract, that in the event it is deemed necessary to extend the time of completion of the work contemplated to be done under this contract, Said extension may be granted by the City Council, ether at Its own option, or upon request of the CONTRACTOR,and shall In no way affect the validity of this contract or release the Surety of Sureties on any Bond attached hereto. IN WETNESS THEREOF,the parties hereto for themselves,their heirs,executors, administrators, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of this agreement and affix their names,titles, and seals this day as above indicated. By President By 7 Secretary (Seal) Note: SIGNATURES MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. (ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS) By Mayor of the City of Rosemead Attested City Clerk of the City of Rosemead c•,izsaswu a.,du AG..rwn.oe cn-s =con Ito » .. a.., .......... ,. .. . ._. - __ __ __ CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Los Angeles On 04/22/99 before me, Anna Choi Lo, notary public personally appeared TOM Y. LEE AND CHANGHHWA LEE personally known to me - OR - ® proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. COM:Son 114:073 ,.Alto t✓ ! ! 'I� — � ',� 4, Way Andel CarNoLos SIGNATURE OF NOTARY My C°rtve. `a'' ��'Zai OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Z INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER UNDERTAKING AGREEMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL LJ ATTORNEY IN FACT 2 NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR 4/22/99 DATE OF DOCUMENT I OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND,UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN BELOW,MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: NAME. Everland, Inc. STREET 1807 S. San Gabriel Blvd./PA ADDRESS CITY. San Gabriel, CA 91776 STAT` Attn: Tom Y. Lee 21R SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT OF EASEMENT ' FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,receipt of which is acknowledged Esther A. Tavarez, trustee for the benefit of 'The Tavarez Family Trust , dated March 27, 1997 GRANT(S)to the CITY OF ROSEMEAD / an EASEMENT for drainage purposes,ingress,egress,construction of storm drain, appurtenances and maintenance in,over and upon that certain real property in the City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles,State of California,described as follows: see Exhibit.j "A"for description Tand sExhibit"B" for plat Dated this 3J L day of I 14^ C' I , 19 -I ci,at &STH P-fiN , trustee Type Full Name) By Type Full Name) £0'd 6650 LD9 PIC s.AaautBu3 uumnt ayyl V£S :BO 66-teZ--+QW C STATE OF LOS H-N}CtljE S OFCOUNTY )ss On Mf{Re r! 304 Wore me, L / LL� '7'1 /.J ((. `� personally appeared ZSTH E' 1\ Arv&) jA' V}I CL personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose name(s)islare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies),and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s)or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,executed the instrument. „ „ „ „ ., n a LILLY PING Cr Comm.#1062605 WITNESS my hand and official seal ?.- c NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA � = s Los Angeles CountycHT D d -^� Ny Comm.Exgres Dime lB.199911 m Si6narc v Notary Public in and for said State Z0'd 6690 L179 DLL s-taauy6u3 uuewLai41 VES =BO 66-4Z--tew EXHIBIT "A" IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD,COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,BEING A VARIABLE WIDTH EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 4,OF TRACT NO. 11444.PER MAP RECORDED IN 1300K 205,PACE 34 OF MAPS,IN THE RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, SAID CORNER BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3 OF SAID TRACT;THENCE NORTH 89° 24' 50" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH'0°3411D" EASE A DISTANCE OF 44.00 FEET:THENCE SOUTH 89° 25' 50" WEST. A DISTANCE OF 1.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°34' 10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 26.00 FEET;THENCE NORTH 89°25' 50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 4.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°34' 1C" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 36.76' FEE;THENCE NORTH 89° 25' 50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF LOU Fttl; 'HENCE SUUI H U" 34' 10" EAS I, A DISTANCE OF 20.08 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 4.SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HELLMAN AVENUE, 6000 FEET WIDE;THENCE SOUTH 89'43" 25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY AND NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY. A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO THE SOJTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 4;THENCE NORTH 0°34' 10" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 126.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. S e:OLLZS89ElL -8850 L99 ILL : WY99: l I : 88-8L-9 :AS ADtl EXHIBIT " B " N'LY UNE. LOT 4 TR. 11444. , TR. 52629 MB 205/34 P.O.E. V N 89' 24'50' E 54.18' — N 89'.24'50' E BOO' $ Y LOT 4 1EVARIABLE WHINDTH � o TR. 11444 b LOT 4, TR 11444, r ''w �T N PER MB 205/34 TO b M.B. 205/34 1R ' THE CITY OF ROSEMEAO N FOR DRAINAGE e n GR PURPOSES, INESS N ('4.I & EGRESS, is `1 CONSTRUCTION OF =s4 w 1.30• w STORM GRAIN, S 89' 25' S0' W O APPURTENANCES, k 3 ? LOT 5 MAINTENANCE 7 8 ',A TR. 11444, Aa 4.30' s LOT 3 .A o"' N 89' 25' 50' E b MB 20„/34 TR. 105/3 (^/1 N MB 205/34 G U D I 7 ELY UNE, Z la LOT 4 1R. 11444, w WLY UNE, MB 205/34 Q LOT 4 w 1R. 11444, .o 8 0' MB 205/34 1- I •X CCI i 4 b 7.00' Q 0 • / N 89' 25' 50' E I w<� Sty UNE, Y 30' I z v w LOT 4 U )-^ n o TR. 11444. L3 I /y� Z o "4- t4 MB 205/34 / n 5.00' o 1.—Nr-r 589' 47' 23' W J 54.49' 0 b n r HELLMAN AVENUE L i:CCli"s89C LL —66S0 Lig Tln : WVSt.. l l : 68-9L-9 : .,,9 noel APR-01 -99 10 . 32 FROM,PLOERA/STEWART ID:91E12419309 PAGE 2 CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST (California Probate Code Section 18100-5) being of legal age,declares under penalty of perjury: 1. Deciarant(s)certify the existence of the following described Trust and state that he/she/they are all of the current trustees: Name of Trust TA RRC- FOHIL qTRUST Date of Trust M ICH .2-7 ok is -1 Trustor/Settlor. es-mete fl TAvi RE= Original Trustees: PAUL r . -MI/ARE-Z. ANr7 FS-mr-A' A IRIIRPE-Z Trust Identification,Social Security a Employer Identification No. ..1.1-,c hs - (-C/—__tat* 2. _tat(- 2.Declarant(s)state that the Trust is in full force and effect and has not been revoked.terminated or otherwise amended in any manner which would cause the representations In thicceflification to be incorrect The name(s)of all persons who have any power to revoke the trust are: L-:-PTH PP H TAS we.Z_ 3. Declarant(s)sate that the following named trustee(s)&are fully empowered to act for said Trust and is/are properly exercising his/her/their authority under said Trust in negotiating for,contract for and executing the documents(s)attached hereto,and that no trustee(s)other than the following named trustees are necessary under the Trust to sign said document(s): Trustees authorized to sign: LS HER A TVOPEa. Nature of document Gy cEH c AIT ) .6=73 Date of document: MARCH 30 -G(l l�,q4 Nature of document Date of document 4. Declarant(s)state that to the best of his/her/their knowledge.there are no(Paims.challenges of any kind or cause of action alleged,contesting or questioning the validity of the Trust or the trustees authority to act for the Trust 5. This Declaration is prepared and executed pursuant to CalifornianProbate Code Section 1)311100.5. Signed under penalty of perjury.this L day of ST APR I L . 19 G( 1 ./55j 1 A. /U,M�.) -rr1>�v--S- sI I q 'E , HEL LMAf) (Signature) C (Address) E-STIER A , PURE " RCSE-ME-AD- CR 9 77o Name(Typed or Printed) (Signature) (Address) - Name(Typed or Printed) /� (1 (j Subscribed and sworn to before me.this • ,�5 day of f"1 PRI I 19 G,LI Le1/ . p. _ re , LILLY YING� V a at ll Comm_4/052605 5 Signature J (SeaO Y crr NOTARY Y L_L:C•CALIFORNIA ` n�� �+ Los Angeles County A State of California r d County of LDS /WIC.el-CA 5 A �.w^' l��R-mo rtes Junel$1T99k �v .. w On RPQ IL- -I Sr Hi 4 q before me LI LL-; (here insert name of notary)personally appeared PS TH c--R A T AVR fit-a personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hs'sheithey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(res)and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s)or the entity on behalf of which the person(s)acted,executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. n/1/7 ` / Ur YING 4 'v;l,� ro Comnl. 1052505 I1 L1 `I J / 1 I Signature ( ( Al (Seal) . �t *T`7 LOSm.Exrres_ ung D LJ ./ C no,-o% Ay Comm.Exons June 18.1999 d s`' 'S v ' S l i f'xi'7 > 4.7 v v lII :Rtl) 'AK I R • 1J ia,l r t1 a ro(.J2...�e ; r ! ,.. i y. -A �� ' 7 S_T • '.- 7w 6 or rnt.asconn - 7 N �� ''‘'':<a"1-,'"t:, F�(s >�ra tsri ems. J ._ } 0 "l L 1. , .t � �i9p 1 4 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES \. iiime; - carer- DEPARTMENT OF.HEALTH SERVICES EA y{{{i .W ty CERTIFICATE OF DEATH VI ..-..e.=.... ... . kj PAUL Castro TAVAREZ ..... ,_..e.�_.... "yam., 01/25/1939 • "' "' 08/01/1997 10050 e•. ............ . ......,.. .:(4‘ i .... Cab forma 573-47-3908 I] ❑ Married I 20 ..a sr 1Whi to �,,, Mex/Amer E, I So. California Edison White p. Custodian I Public Utility ....,23,,..,.... .....<. ...............a..,..... 6119 Hellman Ave. eg e.e..= ,Rosemead Los Angeles , 91770 r ••68 0 California $yBf3 ...... Tavarez, Wi e. :......., 8119 Neuman Ave... .......................... a. ... ( 1 '" "^"' Esther L ,. -.eRosemead. CA. 91770 �`,� Esther Ann ,. Tarin s.1 ...A .. Rogue .......�... .,....,. »."•Tavarez A2_. ..... PARENT 1stIsabel ...,.. ».,.Castro N.M...... kf1F °"" '' 08/05/1997 Resurrection Cemetery, 966 N Potrero Grande Dr., S. San Gabriel CA. 0. 16X] e 1.1,f 12. 8159••,e _• ^__+^-. Pierce Bros Simone DuBois I FD 995 I. /ivrv.� --"------ ?y 08/ 0 / 1997 • PIResidenceLos Angeles "48119 Nei 1man Ave. ❑ Rosemead - -- - '].4 ......................0.. .. e ,s ......... ° In C., Io:. iM,= ❑.o ---re- ,„. 2 :: 1 'vs l 3lr-_ .r . IC Inyl: lfl9 ' 7 ...... 55 u11- Bram lea) l Flaw B1 vd , Nxne .Y42 oA:, nii ' I/ r . nI r r CA9 n..,n.. ❑ ❑ f 4'.3 r,; ti' I E = I" 23000125 ` Thi s Iris Td py oro dfl In IM1 C tv rL . A ale+ '""�`^ A _ D p nmem !H Health Servbes ftM Fears R.gnl metre-np purple Ink. pHc ELES r `e � - a Direcmr of HalthS ices and Registrar 3 s6 _ L13 N 41.-1 This copy not anises prepared on nenvea border d\play-ng seal and aurc ofReRizlmr. "A Stq N•41.-1 r eaL • ICE N PC RESOLUTION 98-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 52629/ZONE VARIANCE 98- 285, SUBDIVIDING ONE LOT INTO SIX LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 3414 ECIGIART AVENUE (APN: 5287-011-010). WHEREAS, Tom Lee, 1807 S. San Gabriel Boulevard, Ste A., San Gabriel , California 91776, filed a request to subdivide a .95 acre site into six single family residential parcels located at 3414 Eckhart Avenue on June 8, 1998; and WHEREAS, this site on Eckhart Avenue is located in the R-2; Light Multiple Residential zoning district which allows one unit per 4,500 square feet of land; and WHEREAS, Section 9104 et seq. of the Rosemead Municipal Code sets standards for development of properties in the R-2 Zone; and WHEREAS, Sections 66451 et seq of the California Government Code (Map Act) and Section 9203 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning Commission to approve, conditionally approve or deny tentative subdivision maps; and WHEREAS, Sections 66473.5 and 66474 of the California Government Code (Map Act) and 9412 of the Rosemead Municipal Code specify the criteria by which a subdivision map may be granted; and WHEREAS, Section 65853 of the California Government Code and Section 9170 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning Commission to approve, conditionally approve or deny variances; and WHEREAS, Section 9171 of the Rosemead Municipal Code specify criteria and procedures for which a variance may be granted; and WHEREAS, an initial study was completed on August 4, 1998 to assess potential environmental impacts from this project; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 1998, notices were posted in 10 public locations and notices were sent to property owners within a 300-foot radius from the subject property specifying the date time and location of the public hearing for Tentative Tract Map 52629/Zone Variance 98- 285; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 1998 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised public hearings to receive oral and written testimony relative to Tentative Tract Map No. 52629/Zone Variance 98-285; and WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that a Negative Declaration shall be adopted. An initial study was completed to analyze potential environmental impacts pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This study found that there would be short term potential environmental impacts resulting from the construction activities. However, these impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance through City PC Resolution 98-43 Tract Map 52629 Page 2 of 4 codes. The initial study for Tentative Tract Map 52629/Zone Variance 98-285 is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that facts do exist to justify approving Tentative Tract Map No. 52629/Zone Variance 98-285 according to the Criteria of Sections 9412 of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows: A. The proposed division will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in the immediate vicinity. FINDING: This project has been designed at an allowed density for the area. This proposal is for six units. All necessary utilities and infrastructure is in place to support the proposed development. Any necessary public improvements have been attached as conditions by the engineering department. B. The proposed division will not be contrary to any official plan adopted by the City Council of the City of Rosemead; or to any official policies or standards adopted by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk at or prior to the time of filing of the appiicatio n hereunder. FINDING: The site is designated for the proper land use designations to permit such a development. The R-2 zone allows single family homes under certain development standards. This proposal has been designed to meet all of the minimum standards for the R-2 zone, with the exception of the minimum lot size. However a variance for less than the minimum lot size is part of this approval. C. Each proposed parcel conforms in area and dimension to the provisions of zoning and subdivision requirements of the City of Rosemead. FLNDING: The applicant has applied for a variance from the minimum lot size required. Five of the six proposed lots that will front onto Dana Court have less than the required 6,000 square feet. Under the flag lot ordinance 5,000 square foot lots would be allowed, however this subdivision design is created on a cul de sac which would complete the half cul de sac that exists on Dana Court. D. All streets, alleys and driveways proposed to serve the property have been dedicated or such dedication is not required for the protection of public safety, health and welfare and that such streets, alleys and driveways are of sufficient width, design and construction to preserve the public safety and to provide adequate access and circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. FINDING: The tentative map indicates that 24 feet will be dedicated as a public street and sidewalk to complete the Dana Court cul de sac. This proposed street design will be a superior improvement over the existing street design and a flag lot design. E. Alley easements and covenants required for the approval of the tentative map or plot plan have been duly executed and recorded. FINDING: There will be no easements or covenants as part of this project. A dedicated public street will provide access to the new parcels. F. That the variance granted shall be subject to conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. PC Resolution 98-43 Tract Map 52629 Page 3 of 4 FINDINGS: Granting this variance would allow the property owner to develop the site in a similar fashion that adjacent properties have been developed. Conditions have been added that will protect the privacy of neighboring properties and maintain the residential character of the neighborhood. G. The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity in which the property is located. FINDINGS: The site has been designed to allow for adequate traffic circulation and the number of parking spaces provided will be adequate for the home types proposed. The proposed setbacks will provide adequate separation from the proposed and existing homes. H. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. FINDINGS: The strict enforcement of the 6,000 square foot lot size minimum would deprive this property owner of developing the lot in a manner that other lots in this zone and area have been developed in the past. With the street dedication, the size and location of the lot would would be able to provide the required minimum lot sizes outlined in the City ordinance. Without the dedication of the public street to complete Dana Court,this property would be designed as a flag lot subdivision, which would meet the standards for the development of six single family homes, however, this would be an inferior design. I. That the granting of such a variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan or any related specific plans. FINDINGS: The general plan designates this area as a mixed use: residential/commercial zone and this proposal is residential in nature. The development meets all of the development standards for the R-2 zone,with the exception of the minimum lot areas of 6,000 square feet. It does meet the density requirement of one home per 4,500 square feet of area. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Tentative Tract Map 52629/Zone Variance 98-285, subdividing three parcels into six single family lots located at 3414 Eckhart Avenue, Rosemead (APN: 5287-011-010), subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days after this decision by the Planning Commission, unless within such time a written appeal is filed with the City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in Article IX - Planning and Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code. PC Resolution 98-43 Tract Map 52629 Page 4 of 4 SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on September 21, 1998, by the following vote: YES: RUIZ, BREEN, LOI NO: ORTIZ, ALARCON ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE SECTION 6. The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1998. a y Ruiz, Chai ns PC Resolution 98-43 Troy Map 52629 Page 5 of 4 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 5th day of October, 1998, by the following vote: YES: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I e • tewart, Secretary TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 52629/ZONE VARIANCE 98-285 3414 Eckhart Avenue CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL September 21 1998 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, any revisions to the approved plans must be resubmitted for review and approval by the Planning Department. 2. Approval shall not take effect for any purpose until the applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead an affidavit stating that he/she is aware of and accepts all of the conditions set forth in the letter of approval and this list of conditions. 3. The applicant shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws relative to the approved use including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff and Health Departments. - 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits, all fees payable under State Law shall be paid. 5. The hours of construction shall be limited from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday - Saturday. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any legal holidays without prior approval by the City. Pursuant to Section 4310 © of the Rosemead Municipal Code. 6. Planning staff shall have access to the subject property at any time during construction to monitor progress. 7. All trash, rubbish and garbage receptacles shall be regularly cleaned, and inspected and maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary condition. 8. No portion of any required front and/or side yards shall be used for storage of any type. 9. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed, litter free state in accordance with Section 5401-5405 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, which pertains to the storage, accumulation, collection, and disposal of garbage, rubbish, trash, and debris. All trash containers shall be stored in the appropriate trash enclosure at all times. Any new litter and graffiti shall be removed within twenty-four (24) hours. 10. The perimeter property lines of the newly created lots, or where designated by the Director of Planning shall be fenced with a six-foot (6') high masonry wall, with finished surface on both sides, or wooden fence, supported by steel posts in concrete. For residential properties, this wall/fence may end at the front setback line of the front lot. Wrought iron shall be used in locations bordering public right-of-way and other areas as designated on the approved site plans. 11. All roof top appurtenances and equipment shall be adequately screened from view to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 17. Driveways and parking areas shall be surfaced and improved with Portland concrete cement or asphaltic concrete, and thereafter maintained in good serviceable condition. 13. The property shall be graded to drain to the street, but in no case shall such drainage be allowed to sheet flow across public sidewalk. A grading and/or drainage plan shall be prepared, submitted to and approved by the Building Official, and such grading and drainage shall take place in accordance with such approved plan. 14. The numbers of the address signs shall be at least 6" tall with a minimum character width of 1/4", contrasting in color and easily visible at driver's level from the street. The location, color and size of such sign shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 15. Applicant shall obtain a public works permit for all work in or adjacent to the public right-of-way. 16. Applicant shall install and complete all necessary public improvements, including but not limited to street, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, handicap ramps, and storm drains, along the entire street frontage of the development site as required by the Director of Planning. 17. Prior to issuance of building penults, the Planning Department shall review and approve all electric underground utility transformer locations for compatibility with the site design. All portions of the transformers that are above ground shall be adequately screened with landscaping and/or screen walls. Landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 18. All ground level mechanical/utility equipment (including meters, back flow preservation devices, fire valves and other equipment) shall be screened by screening walls and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 19. All utilities shall be placed underground including facilities and wires for the supply and distribution of electrical energy, telephone, cable television etc. The underground conversion of these utilities shall consider all future connections to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning. 20. Each dwelling unit shall be provided with water conservation fixtures such as low-flush toilets and low-flow faucets. The hot water beater and lines shall be insulated. Landscaping irrigation systems shall be designed for high efficiency. A permit must be obtained from the Fire Department for temporary storage of lumber used to construct six or more houses. The permit will be issued on the basis of good access for fire fighting purposes, availability of water and distances to structure or fire hazards. 21. Prior to issuance of Building permits, a landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Deparnnent for review. It shall include an irrigation plan with automatic timers and moisture sensors. Fifteen (15) percent of the landscape area shall be planted with 15-gallon trees. 22. A permanent maintenance program of all landscaping shall be provided insuring regular irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement. 23. Automated irrigation shall be installed, and approved by the Planning Department. 24. The applicant shall install approved street trees in a location chosen by and to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department. In addition, at least one 15-gallon tree shall be provided on each newly created lot subject to the approval of the Director Pluming. 25. All required yard and common areas shall be landscaped with turf, trees and shrubs and shall be maintained as necessary. 26. All open area not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be landscaped with turf and maintained on a regular basis. • 27. No trees shall be removed other than those shown on the approved plans. 28. Landscape materials and irrigation systems are to be inspected by a City representative prior to final release of utilities. 29. NO OCCUPANCY will be granted until ALL IMPROVEMENTS required by this approval have been completed, inspected, and approved by the appropriate department(s). 30. No finals will be given until all as-built site improvement plans have been submitted to the Building Department. 31. All requirements of the Building and Safety Department and Planning Department shall be complied with prior to the final approval of the proposed construction. • 32. Violation of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of revocation proceedings. 33. The project shall comply with the conditions'set forth in the City Engineer's Report dated September 8, 1998 , and the these conditions shall be completed to the City Engineer's satisfaction prior to recordation of the final map. 34. This map shall be finaled and recorded within two (2) years of tentative approval. Failure to do so may result in the map's expiration and the need for another tentative map application. Any request for extension must be submitted, in writing, together with ten (10) copies of the map and corresponding plans, to the Planning Department before the expiration date. 35. Mail boxes shall be provided and installed by the developer. The design and location shall be provided by the local postmaster and the Director of Planning. 36. All conditions of Case No(s): TTM 52629/ZV 98-285 must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning, prior to final approval of associated maps, building permits, occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request. 37. The conditions listed on this Exhibit shall be copied directly onto development plans submitted to the Planning and Building Departments for review. 38. The property shall be kept cleared of weeds, debris and abandoned vehicles, and maintained pursuant to the County Fire and Health codes until it is developed. All trash shall be contained in dumpsters and removed on an as-needed basis. No trash shall be visible from outside the dumpster. Surplus construction materials shall be stored so as to be screened from public view when not actually in use. 39. A 6'-high fence, composed of chain link or other approved material, shall totally enclose the perimeter of the property when vacant, under construction, or under demolition, and said fence shall remain until Occupancy is granted. 40. Any existing structures to be demolished shall be boarded until such demolition takes place. 41. The proposed second floors shall have windows with lower sills no less than 66- inches (5.5 feet) above the finished floor level, or finished with obscure glass, to protect the privacy of adjacent residences subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. 43. All colors of the homes shall be limited to earth tones and pastels and subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. 44. All units shall provide and maintain roll-up garage doors. ENGINEERING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL These conditions shall be completed to the City Engineer's satisfaction prior to recordation of the final map. GENERAL 1. Details shown on the tentative map are not necessarily approved. Any details which are inconsistent with requirements of ordinances, general conditions of approval, or City Engineer's policies must be specifically approved in the final map or improvement plan approvals. 2. A fnal tract map prepared by, or under the direction of a Registered Civil Engineer authorized to practice land surveying, or a Licensed Land Surveyor, must be processed through the City Engineer's office prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 3. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required showing all fee interest holders and encumbrances. An updated title report shall be provided before the final tract map is released for filing with the County Recorder. 4. Monumentation of tract map boundaries, street centerline and lot boundaries is required for a map based on a field survey. 5. Final tract map shall be filed with the County Recorder and one (1) mylar copy of filed map shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office prior to issuance of • building permits. 6. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 7. Approval for filing of this land division is contingent upon approval of plans and specifications mentioned below. If the improvements are not installed prior to the filing of this division, the developer must submit an Undertaking Agreement and a Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bond in the amount estimated by the City Engineer guaranteeing the installation of the improvements. 8. The City reserves the right to impose any new plan check and/or permit fees approved by City Council subsequent to tentative approval of this map. DRAINAGE AND GRADING 9. Prior to the recordation of the final map, grading and drainage plans must be approved to provide for contributory drainage from adjoining properties as approved by the City Engineer, including dedication of the necessary easements. 10. A grading and drainage 'plan must provide for each lot having an independent drainage system to the public street, to a public drainage facility, or by means of an approved drainage easement. 11. Historical or existing storm water flow from adjacent lots must be received and directed by gravity to the street, a public drainage facility, or an approved drainage easement. ROAD 12. Developer shall widen and construct additional street improvements to provide for a 36-foot public street with curb, gutter and sidewalk on Danna Court. 13. Plans for street improvements and street light layout for the proposed street shall be submitted to the City Engineer and must be approved prior to filing the final map. 14. The new street section shall drain to Eckhart Avenue. 15. New drive approaches shall be constructed at least 3' from any above-ground obstructions in the public right-of-way to the top of "e or the obstruction shall be relocated. 16. Drive approaches shall be at least 10' wide. 17. Developer shall grant a 24' wide road deed dedication along the property frontage, including additional dedication in the cul-de-sac bulb. Final limits of dedication shall be based upon that required for street and sidewalk per the approved street plans. ---- -- - 18. Developer shall construct a wheelchair ramp per City standards at the southeast corner of Eckert Avenue and Danna Court. SEWER 19. Approval of this land division is contingent upon providing separate house sewer laterals to serve each lot of the land division. UTILITIES 20. Power, telephone and cable television service shall be underground. 21. Any utilities that are in conflict with the development shall be relocated at the developer's expense. WATER • 22. All lots shall be served by adequately sized water system facilities, which shall include fire hydrants of the size, type and location as determined by the Fire Chief. 23. The water mains shall be of sufficient size to accommodate the total domestic and fire flow required for the land division. Domestic flows required are to be determined by the City Engineer. Fire flows required are to be determined by the Fire Chief. 24. Prior to the filing of the final map, there shall also be filed with the City Engineer, a statement from the water purveyor indicating subdivider compliance with the Fire Chiefs fire flow requirements. "Exhibit A" CEQA APPENDIX G ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1 . Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 52629 Zone Variance 98-285 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rosemead Planning Department 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Peter Lyons, Director of Planning (626) 288-6671 4. Project Location: City of Rosemead County of Los Angeles, State of California Assessor Parcel Number(s): 5287-011-010 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Torn Lee 1807 S. San Gabriel Boulevard San Gabriel, CA 91776 . 6. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use: Residential/Commercial 7. Zoning: R-2; Light Multiple Residential 8. Description of the Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. (Attach additional sheets if necessary) The subdivision of one existing lot into six, for the purpose of constructing six new, two-story, single family homes. 9. Surrounding Land uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings) The City of Rosemead is an urban suburb located in the San Gabriel Valley, 10 miles east of the City of Los Angeles. It is bounded on the north by the cities of Temple City and San Gabriel, on the west by South San Gabriel, on the south by Montebello, plus by El Monte and South El Monte on the east. The city is 5.5 square miles or 2,344 acres in size. Rosemead is home to a resident population of approximately 55,760 people. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g. permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). EXHIBIT " G" • • ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below ( V ) would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Hazards & Hazardous Public Services Materials Agriculture Resources Hydrology/Water Recreation Quality Air Quality Land Use/Planning Transportation/Traffic Biological Resources Mineral Resources Utilities/Service Systems Cultural Resources Noise Mandatory Findings of Significance Geology/Soils Population/Housing DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, ✓ and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potential significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects la) have been analyzed in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ER, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project., nothing further is required. de,:zovil7d gAike Signature • Date B,e,to JoHN5 on/ Printed Name For EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved le. g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e. g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). • 2 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures. and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis maybe used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) _ (D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section 17 at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. ' 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. R) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones. 9) The analysis of each issue should identify: {a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Issues and Supporting Information Sources potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: al Rave a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? I ✓ bl Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic 1� highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of ✓ the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would v adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland ofV Statewide Importance {Farmland) to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson ✓ Act contract? cl Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 3 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant significant Significant impact Issues Unless • Sapam Mitigation Incorporated 3. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air ✓ Quality Abatement Plan or Congestion Management Plan? bl Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute ✓ to an existing or projected air quality violation? - c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ✓ ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Create or contribute to a non-stationary source "hot spot" ✓ (primarily carbon monoxide)? 11 el Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant I ✓ concentrations? f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? V 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Adversely impact, either directly or through habitat • modifications, any endangered, rare, or threatened species, as listed in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (Sections V 570.2 or 670.51 or in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (Sections 17.11 or 17.12)? b) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, V policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional ✓ plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fisn and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? d) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable V impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? e) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident ✓ micratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? U Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or V ordinance? g) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, other approved I V local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No PP 9 Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of unique . archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? V d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Mao issued by the V State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? V This site is located in a proposed Seismic Hazard Zone as identified by the Calif. Dept. Of Conservation, Division of Mines & Geology. This zone indentifies this area as having the potential for liquefaction. The new map will not become official until February of 1999, after required public hearings are held. This project would not be exempt from mitloa_tion measures if and when this new zone and associated map becomes an official document. iv) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflows? V v) Landslides? _ I ✓ vi) Flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? vii) Wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas and where residences are intermixed with wildlands? bl Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of V topsoil? c) Would the project result in the loss of a unique geologic feature? - ✓ d) !s the project located on strata or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? This site is located in a proposed Seismic Hazard Zone as identified by the Calif. Dept. Of Conservation, Division of Mines & Geology. This zone indentifies this area as having the potential for liquefaction. The new map will not become official until February of 1999, after required public hearings are held. This project would not be exempt from mitigation measures if and when this new zone and associated map becomes an official document. • e) Is the project located on expansive soil creating substantial risks I ✓ to life CO property? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Len Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated f) Where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water, is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or V alternative waste water disposal systems? 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous V materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions ✓ involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or ✓ waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government V Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? • e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public ✓ airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in ✓ the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent ✓ to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality ✓ standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially degrade groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume ora lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing • ✓ nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? cl Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream V or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? dl Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface V runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off- site? 6 • Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No PP 9 Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated el Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to ✓ control? 1) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or ✓ other flood hazard delineation map? g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would ✓ impede or redirect flood flows? 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Pnysically divide an established community? V b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an acency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal ✓ program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The proposed subdivision creates lot areas that are less than the required 6,000 square feet. The applicant has filed a variance application that is requesting five of the six lots to be slightly less than the 6,000 sqaure feet required. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geolooist that would be of value V to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local General plan, ✓ specific plan or other land use plan? 11. NOISE. Would the project iesult in: ai Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or V noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne ✓ vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the ✓ project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the V project? el For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public ✓ airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to V excessive noise levels? 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: L Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Inwact Mitigation Incorporated a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or ✓ indirectly Ifor example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating ✓ the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ✓ construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantially adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ✓ b) Police protection? V c) Schools? V d) Parks? 1 I V e) Other public facilities? 1 V 14. RECREATION. Would the project: al Increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical V deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse ✓ physical effect on the environment? 115. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle V trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management V agency for designated roads or highways?' c) Result in a change in area traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in V substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses le. g. ✓ farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? I ✓ ) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ✓ I gl Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative I v transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? B Potentially Potentially Less Than No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Significant Significant Impact i Issues Unless Impact Mitipation Incorpotated 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable ✓ Regional Water Quality Control Board? - b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing ✓ facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ✓ construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? dl Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded V entitlements needed? e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to ✓ serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? H Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal ✓ needs? • 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal V community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or encanoered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the ✓ disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? cl Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when V viewed in connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or ✓ indirectly? CDL.]=' OF L05 ANGEL=S a_7= DE =--"�P_ • 'c"s ' CONDITIONS OPP, AD- s,RO AFOR SBD=VIST_ONS - INCORPO=__E__ D viCr Subdivision Nc . C/p2(0o2 / Mau Dans ,�1 C. U. P . Nc . CICY Peatirtead • [ "'( Access s:zl ` comply 502 i the r o___ whic _ =s _ ez: _r 5'--:^_ __cess. All wearier access _ _ _ Jc � ' Fire De?=car __ Access shall be _-D ____ _siz'c_ __ c y exterior ocr: _n c= all s:_. __ _as I 1 Where driveways extendfurther :han 300 feet and are J_ s-^_' ' '--' - -c provided su_:'_n_=- .c_ :lir __ _c___ equipment �use e s-c_nnz .^. their :..tea _cm :h final map. rn r- -'_s shell_ be ces__ .ec. constructed z__ ___ __ MaiCo _.sure he _ __ _ _/_ for - use n _ �J _ Depart-- d, --=-=s, __ _ _ _ __ ___ d ie Ja• S •:CSCh a xtend cvar [ 1 Thehe_-private shall -- _=-a. - _ :_ e_ =_J as "Driva Ca Driveway driveways _ __ _ _ __ ___ _ v`_z _� .'" � _a.. _ •-- be a_ _._..u_ _.. zc �_r e'_z==• ____ tae ___s'C_uu__w .._ arra__ a nce C___ •__s_ ___a . _ [� vehicular access must - - _ J' 5 v: bl a LC_.: _ construction : all _2a :Cs.- �'-1 VC _ a _ns:alled. --car', _ _ zea—r:=' 7-=or to cons_-•-_:__, [ 1 his � i .: __:_. -.i 71_=_ De^.._ _ ..__' • s t^-'-'^ ..__ arra z_-- c^=-- ^" arra _ _ __ y,. :.: _z_:_n :_�_ shall ush _z s__ ._- _- c __ _ __ _ J _ ___ _ u _a- _ Cle______ - Fire °`e--"' - . . 509 c. - __ __ Avenue, Pc-.—'. Ca. 51 :9c-3013. -hone [90=3 5'2_1::2 ..__ails] _ rs __ u___. __ ___- -y :h-s'dap=r: .=r_ ___ __ _ _ only. ere _ z___o-re. by ::' C__ ._ • .,_ urs _ __ ___ __ ____ __ ___ _.. __ e_ a_ Ccr-,a_:::s : zri • roam zs< - F LOS ANGELES "ASE DEPARTMENT `, COON Q INC0-.70 RATED CITIES o5re5 RTE CTIGN CONDITIONS - is = P9S26z TENTATIVE MAP GATE SUBDIVISION : I RE REPORT �— •_ REVISED cry �2___t � WATE=• SYSTEM RS^UIREM2NT5 Provide water mains, fire hydrants, and `fire flows as recuired by the County of Los Anoe!es Fire Depanmen: I I for all land shown on map to be recorded. psi . Gallons per minute at 20 for for public fire hydrants at this location is 'Rye at hydrant(S) for I The ti n red fire flow pdemand. • _ hours. over and above maximum deify domestic duration of' fire dove. simultaneously may be used to achieve the required is yallOn5 per minute at 20 psi. -2- flow for private on-site hydrantswith two hydrant I 1 The required on-siteof cellons per minute_ =_t 20 psi flowing private On-site hydrant must be capable flowing water sours=_. sienuha n=ecsl'I, one of which must a=_ the .uha5; -pm the. public I I I Fire hydrant ren-uirements are follows: Install public fire hydrant!sl. UJBr'='- public `re hydrant(sl. Install private on-site fire n'ydrentlsl. T brass or bronze. nfornine to current AIAAVA standard C503 c I 1 Al] rohydrants shall measure x = ,I_ a minimum of 5 from a structure or protected by a '::o (2 ao proved equal. All hydrants snail be installed • hour fire wall. i i LOcatidn: As der MES, On :J2 v:ith this G ice_. • IC, ._: '___tion: __ o - nded for prior to Final a az:rover I V11 icurar _ aL o ' v.-^._..far z_=_� u s, .,e o.pv.c 2c ..._ maintained _ n:hour. construction. .._ :or water mains. hydrants - fir '= County aY Los •n 5 r _ .5 n Oval Inns diviSion Df .ant: as a, f zoned and/Gr suG flows +_ a condition �f c __ _. _ - .,..c ..5 e s f_.. s_bq . .._JUpnal water system, •c__i.er�'_,... ...i os buildinc n,. oroces. — V vc a- an: 'Are flow __ ._ .'=^••=-7- :c ,treec_.,_-.. Fire Ga_e .. _. t requirements. - s ts! - is r ao .. I I Upgrade not - 'ss s:in • TRIS OFFICE FOP. '-u_-y. EUEr.117 CT-IFLETED ICElirdirvAL ONLY! FIFE FLOW AVAil_e.Ell_r7Y ::::ASM 70 /92 __ minimum 5 _ _. 7Th __ .. 21-. tre... This snarl == j _ -s/Z purveyor -r98 � � 1