CC - Item 2A – Staff Report Public Hearing Res. 98-33 Certification of Compliance with the LA County Congestion Management Plan S. �0
±
i ,,,\ , 'I
4,4. ! star
eport
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAG ��
DATE: AUGUST 5, 1998
RE: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION 98-33 — CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires each city to annually adopt a
resolution during a public hearing stating its compliance with the CMP. The attached
resolution attests to the fact that the City of Rosemead has met all requirements of the
CMP.
The City of Rosemead has previously adopted a transportation demand management
ordinance as well as a land use analysis program consistent with the requirements of the
CMP.
The CMP deficiency plan requires all cities to monitor new development and compare the
corresponding increase in trips with mitigation projects that increase highway traffic
capacity. The attached 1998 Deficiency Plan Status Summary indicates new development
resulted in 51 debits that were offset by 708 transportation improvement credits. The
resulting credits are added to the City's credit bank from last year's submittal, which will
leave a credit balance of 5,397.
Upon adoption of Resolution 98-33, staff will forward the self-certification to the Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 98-33.
FGT:kjr
COUNCIL AGENDA
AUG 111998
ITEM No. �. 4.
J
RESOLUTION NO. 98-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA,
FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND
ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65089
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA"),
acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1995
Congestion Management Program in November, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the
County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP local
implementation report by September 1 of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 11, 1998.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City Of Rosemead
does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City
is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1995 CMP.
By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City will conduct annual traffic counts and
calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the
requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand
management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP
Transportation Demand Management Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis
program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use
Analysis Program Chapter.
The City has adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made
a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances
traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements,
and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide
Deficiency Plan.
Section 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 11th day of August, 1998.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 06-Aug-98
1998 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998
Contact: Micheal Neal
Phone Number: (626)288-6671
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
1998 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal
[from Section I] (51)
Exempted Dwelling Units 0
Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims
[from Section II] .. 708
Land Use Strategy Claims 0
Capital Improvement Claims 1
Transit Claims 2
TDM Claims 2
Total Strategies Claimed 5
Subtotal Current Credit (Goal) 657
3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (1997)
Local Implementation Report 4,740
Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance: 5,397
Section I, Page 1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 06-Aug-98
1998 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category Dwelling Debit Debits
Units Value/DU
Single Family Residential 33.00 x 6.80 = 224
Multi-Family Residential 0.00 x 4.76 = 0
Group Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 Gross Debit Debits
Square Feet Value/1000SF
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 4.00 x 22.23 = 89
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 = 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 3.00 x 66.99 = 201
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 Gross Debit Debits
Square Feet Value/1000SF
Lodging 0.00 x 7.21 = 0
Industrial 0.50 x 6.08 = 3
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 = 0
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 = 0
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 = 0
Medical 0.00 x 16.90 = Cr
Government 0.40 x 20.95 = 8
Institutional/Educational 2.70 x 7.68 = 21
University 0.00 x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description Daily Trips Debit Debits
(Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter"0"if none) Value/Trip
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0
Subtotal New Development Activity = 546
Adjustments (Optional)- Complete Part 2 0 = 495
Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points) = (51)
Section I, Page 2
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 06-Aug-98
1998 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter"0"so it will total.
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1)development permits that
were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and
2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category Dwelling Adjustment Subtotal
Units Value/DU
Single Family Residential 15.00 x 6.80 = 102
Multi-Family Residential 0.00 x 4.76 = 0
Group Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category 1000 Gross Adjustment Subtotal
Square Feet Value/1000SF
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 17.70 x 22.23 = 393
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 = 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 x 66.99 = 0
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category 1000 Gross Adjustment Subtotal
Square Feet Value/10005F
Lodging 0.00 x 7.21 = 0
Industrial 0.00 x 6.08 = 0
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 = 0
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 = 0
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 = 0
Medical 0.00 x 16.90 = 0
Government 0.00 x 20.95 = 0
Institutional/Educational 0.00 x 7.68 = 0
University 0.00 x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Description Daily Trips I Adjustment Subtotal
(Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter"0" if None) Value/Trip
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0
Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 495
Section I, Page 3
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 06-Aug-98
1998 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
(NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
LowNery Low Income Housing 0 Dwelling Units
High Density Residential 0 Dwelling Units
near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments 0 1000 Gross Square Feet
near Rail Stations 0 Dwelling Units
Development Agreements entered 0 1000 Gross Square Feet
into Prior to July 10, 1989 0 Dwelling Units
Reconstruction of Buildings 0 1000 Gross Square Feet
damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest 0 Dwelling Units
Reconstruction of Buildings 0 1000 Gross Square Feet
damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake 0 Dwelling Units
Total Dwelling Units 0
Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0
Exempted Development Definitions:
LowNery Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and
Community Development as follows:
Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income,with adjustments for family size.
Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential
density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a
minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development
is used for high density residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement(as specified under
Section 65864 of the California Government Code)with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or
destroyed, to the extent of not less than 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake
or other similar calamity.
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning
regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval
authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR.
Section I, Page 4
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 06-Aug-98
1998 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998
SECTION Il.b - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Cap. Imp. Projects: 1 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points): 288
1 2 3 Intersection Modification, CMP Arterial 5.Scope 6.Units
1 244.1 4 Rosemead/Mission Protected Left-turn Phasing 1,0 -tersectior
7. Str. Name: Rosemead Boulevard
B. From/To: @ Mission Drive
9. Intersection: Mission Drive I10. Map Page: 596
11. Participants: None
12. MTA Funding: 0% 13. Your share of local funding: 100%
14. Portion of Project within your jurisdiction: 100%
15. Other Info: na
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
575.00 575 1998 $144 50% 3 0 100% 288
Section Il.b, Page 1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 4t#414441
1998 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998
SECTION II.d - TRANSIT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Transit Projects: 2 Total Transit Credit (Points): 369
1 2 3 Dial-A-Ride Service 5.Scope: 6. Units:
1 364.00 4 Rosemead Dial-A-Ride 159 PMT
TRANSIT SERVICE TYPE
TRANSIT CREDIT VALUE 7. Express 8. Local 9.Shuttle 10. DialaRide Total Credits
Current Avg Weekday Ridership: 0 0 0 44
Credit Factor(avg. miles per rider): 7.7 3.3 1.0 4.5
Avg. Daily PMT: 0 0 0 200 200
11. First Year of Service: 1982
12. Prior credits for ridership: 41
13. Milestone Reached: 2 Enter a zero (0 )for
14. Milestone Percent Factor: 100% all blue font entries
15.Annual Operating Cost: 325 if the question is not
16.Percent Funded Locally: 100% applicable or the
17. If commuter rail feeder service: 0 answer is unknown
18. If urban rail feeder service: 0
19. Prior credits for rail hoardings: 0
20. Net 1998 Credit Value: 159
1 2 3 Local Shuttle 5. Scope: 6. Units.
2 365.00 4 Rosemead Shuttle 210 PMT
TRANSIT SERVICE TYPE
TRANSIT CREDIT VALUE [ 7. Express 8. Local 9. Shuttle 10. DialaRide Total Credits
Current Avg Weekday Ridership: 0 0 224 0
Credit Factor (avg. miles per rider): 7.7 3.3 1.0 4.5
Avg. Daily PMT: 0 0 224 0 224
11. First Year of Service: 1986
12. Prior credits for ridership: 14
13. Milestone Reached: 2 Enter a zero (0 )for
14. Milestone Percent Factor: 100% all blue font entries
15. Annual Operating Cost: 186 if the question is not
16. Percent Funded Locally: 100% applicable or the
17. If commuter rail feeder service: 0 answer is unknown
18. If urban rail feeder service: 0
19. Prior credits for rail boardings: 0
20. Net 1998 Credit Value: 210
Section II.d, Page 1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 06-Aug-98
1998 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998
SECTION II.e - TDM CREDIT CLAIMS
Total TDM Projects: 12 ITotal TDMCredit (Points): I 52
1 321.0 CMP TDM Ordinance 10.60 1000 gsf
Non-Residential building permits issued, as reported in Section I
No other description/entries required for this strategy. This is already done for you.
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0.30 3 n/a n/a 100% 3 n/a 100% 3
1 2 3 Subsidy of 60-69%. Resident Program 5. Scope: 6. Units:
2 331.26 4 Transit Subsidy Program 1 100 users
Enter zero ( 0 ) if question does not apply:
7.Total employees in program: 139
8.Total employers: 1
9. Operator of Transit Service: MTA
10. Percent of Total Fare Subsidized: 67%
11. Net Gain avg monthly participants: 10
12. Facility/Center Address: na
13. Daily Parking Rate: $0.00
14. Fee Increase: $0.00
15. Other Info:
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
59.50 60 1998 $110 100% 3 11 100% 49
Section II.e, Page 1