CC - Item 5B - Approval of Minutes - 02-27-18 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AND CITY COUNCIL AND
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION REGULAR JOINT MEETING
FEBRUARY 27,2018
The special meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Low at 6:19 p.m.
in the Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead,
California
PRESENT: Mayor Low, Mayor Pro Tem Ly, Council Members Armenta and Clark
Council Member Ly joined the meeting at 6:31 p.m.
ABSENT: Council Member Alarcon
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Molleda, City Attorney Richman, Director of Finance Lieu,
Director of Community Development Kim,Director of Parks and Recreation Chacon, Director of
Public Works Ramirez, and City Clerk Donohue
City Attorney Richman announced the study session discussion was moving to the City Council
conference room and the public was welcome to attend. Any presentation would be conducted in
open session after the study session.
1. WORKSHOP
A. Homeless Planning Grant
The City of Rosemead was one of the 23 cities awarded a Homeless Planning grant
by the County of Los Angeles to address the issue of homelessness within
Rosemead. Grant amounts ranged from $30,000 to $70,000 and were based on
each City's homeless population as reported by the Los Angeles Homeless Services
Authority (LAI-ISA). Rosemead was entitled to the minimum grant amount of
$30,000, which was awarded to those cities with less than 99 homeless people.
The County has since contracted with the San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments, who has retained LeSar Development Consultants, for the
development of all participating cities Homeless Plan (Plan). The purpose of the
Plan is to proactively set processes, based on existing and anticipated resources,
and thereby improve efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery to those who
are homeless while also working with the County to address regional solutions to
the issue of homelessness. As part of the process,three input sessions will be taking
place (City Council, staff and social service providers, and the
community). Tonight's presentation by LeSar Development Consultants is to
obtain the City Council's input into the development of Rosemead's Plan.
Rachel Ralston, Principal of LeSar Development Consultants gave an overview of
the homelessness plan. She explained that according to the Los Angeles Homeless
Services Authority there are approximately 50 homeless people in the city. She
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting ITEM NO. 5.B
Minutes of Februaty 27, 2018
Page 1 of 12
spoke about the Housing First approach and how effective the program has been to
the homeless population. A lot of the homelessness funding is tied to the Housing
First program. She explained LeSar Development Consultants would be doing
input sessions with community members to really ask them what the significant
issues arc and what they see working. Also, assessing existing activities and
resources, and drafting a plan with city staff in using County plan templates. Once
the Council reviews the draft plan and makes changes, the City Council can accept
the plan and submit to the Los Angeles County by June 301h, 2018. The plan
strategies are flexible and can be updated anytime as the City sees fit.
Mayor Low asked if the $30,000 grant was an annual or a one-time grant.
Ms. Ralston replied the grant was a one time grant.
Council Member Clark asked Ms. Ralston how she obtained the count of 50
homeless for the City.
Ms. Ralston explained the city's local count was 17. However, the Los Angeles
Homeless Services Authority official number was 50 based on their different
methodology for counting individuals in makeshift shelters and cars. In terms of
funding that flows into cities, it's based on whatever that number is and officially
recognized by the Housing and Urban Development.
Council Member Clark asked for clarification on Ms. Ralston's statement on
getting the most critical homeless off the street.
Ms. Ralston explained the Housing First approach is one aspect were every person,
not just the most critical, would get stabilized in a housing and a path in accepting
services. A critical part is coordinated entry, which is the assessment of
vulnerability and prioritizing individuals that are the most mentally and physically
unstable who arc essentially likely to die on the street. Also, those who commonly
use services in jails and emergency rooms that need acute care and are getting
services in expensive ways. Those are the particular homeless population that are
the most difficult population to work with.
Council Member Clark stated not everybody agrees with the Housing First
approach. She reiterated that at a League of California seminar last year, there was
a homeless session led by Saint Johns, who work with the homeless population.
The organization shared they approached the Housing First method ten years ago
and realized that you need to take care of the mental health and drug addiction
issues and get them help. Proof that Housing First approach does not necessarily
work was a woman who they got into in to housing first,with our addressing mental
health and drug addiction aspect, ten years later her two kids were back on the
street. wit . She explained in the past, she suggested to County Supervisor Hilda
Solis to have the county's vacant property near University of Southern California
campus, to turn into housing units where homeless could be screened for the
mentally ill to drug addicts to obtain the proper services they need. As for people
down on their luck,those are the people you want to get rapid housing for. She also
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of February 27, 2018
Page 2 of 12
shared her suggestions with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
Homeless Committee, because if the focus is Housing First, you don't get the drug
addicts off their habits nor their mental health issue solved.
She continued the grant was not brought to the City Council and it was applied by
a former employee. The funding was not going to augment the support or helping
organizations such as Family Promise and Volunteers of America, but rather
majority of the funding was going towards planning. She opposed the proposed
grant and commended staff for already doing things for the city to address
homelessness. She added that the City of Monterey Park was disturbed by the 72
page contract and they withdrew from the grant. She expressed concerns with the
terms in the contract and therefore, was not in favor of the grant.
Mayor Low asked why the County would just not give the funding to the city
directly.
Ms. Ralston explained there are cities that chose to apply for the grant and have
their city staff develop the plan. However, other cities such as Rosemead, entered
into an agreement with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments to contract
with LeSar Development Consultant which resulted in a Memorandum of
Understanding with each city.
Jan Cicco, Regional Homelessness Coordinator of the San Gabriel Valley Council
of Governments stated she worked with the City of Pomona and developed a plan
that is currently being implemented. She explained there is a level of expertise and
complexities of the homeless population,as well as creating an effective plan which
is time consuming for staff. Therefore, many cities chose to apply for the County's
grant program.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly thanked LeSar Development Consultant and Council of
Governments for coming to the meeting to speak. He expressed concerns there are
a variety of homeless, some do not want assistance, and then those who want an
opportunity to get back on their feet. He reiterated Council Member Clark's
comments in addressing those who have emotional, mental, and psychological
issues need to receive the appropriate help. Ile noted that housing first may not be
the one strategy that solves the homeless issue. The city needs to look at how it can
provide services for those people that have the most opportunity to put harm on the
community, so that issue is contained and limited. Both the City Council and staff
need to look at the city's philosophy on homelessness, as well as the continued
support for organizations like Family Promise.
Council Member Armenta expressed concerns with the homeless count discrepancy
between the city and the county. She added the perception of an additional 33 more
homeless people would indicate there is an abundance of homeless in the city,when
there is not. She reiterated the city has services in place such as the Quality of Life
program, where the Sheriff Deputies, Code Enforcement, City staff, Waste Hauler
and County representatives go out and speak to homeless people to provide them
with services and resources. She asked Ms. Ralston what the grant would provide
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Commanity
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of February 27, 2018
Page 3 of 12
to the city that is different in addressing homelessness, when most of the funding is
going towards consulting services. During the workshop she asked staff if they felt
comfortable on continuing with the programs that we have, and staff felt very
comfortable to continue.
Mayor Low stated the City Council may not feel that $30,000 grant and program is
appropriate for the City.
City Attorney Richman stated the prior City Manager did enter into a contract,
however, the contract has not been presented to the City Council for approval nor
has the grant been received. She advised the city council to look at the termination
provisions, and direct the City Manager to officially notify the Council of
Governments on what the Council would like to do. If the Council wishes to not
accept the grant, then the item should be agendized at the next meeting to confirm
the direction of the city.
Mayor Low directed staff to notify the Council of Governments and bring back the
item to the next meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly requested staff to provide information in the City Manager's
Newsletter on how the City addresses the homeless issue from those that are chronic
homeless to those that are down on their luck.
Mayor Low recessed the workshop at 7:21 p.m. and reconvened back at 7:30 p.m.
RECONVENE TO REGULAR MEETING
The regular joint meeting of the Rosemead City Council and Successor Agency to the Community
Development Commission was called to order by Mayor Low at 7:30 p.m. in the Rosemead City
Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California
PRESENT: Mayor/Chair Low, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice-Chair Ly, Council Members/Board
Members Armenta and Clark
ABSENT: Council Member/Board Member Alarcon
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Mayor Low
INVOCATION was led by Council Member Clark
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Molleda, City Attorney Richman, Director of Finance Lieu,
Director of Community Development Kim, Director of Parks and Recreation Chacon, Director of
Public Works Ramirez, and City Clerk Donohue
2. CLOSED SESSION - None
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of Februag 27, 2018
Page 4 of 12
Velia Navarro inquired if the city has addressed the current gun issue at schools and how
to protect children and teachers. She suggested that all schools should have metal detectors.
Council Member Armenta clarified to Mrs. Navarro that her concerns should be addressed
to the School Districts, since the City did not have jurisdiction on school issues. She added
there arc Sheriff Deputies that work with the local schools.
Heather Shawkie, teacher at Muscatel Middle School invited the City Council to their
Annual Gramarch festival at Rosemead Park.
Muscatel Middle School students, Jaden Perla, Peter Vo,Tiffany Trinh, and Hilda Sanchez
thanked the City Council for their funding support of the Gramarch Festival.
Council Member Armenta thanked Ms. Shawkie for putting Rosemead on the map and
teaching her students proper grammar.
4. PRESENTATIONS - None
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Public Hearing on Residential/Commercial Mixed-Use Project -- Design Review
16-04
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:
I. Conduct a public hearing and receive public testimony; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2018-11, adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approving Design
Review 16-04; or take alternative action not adopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration or denying Design Review 16-04; or take other action.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF TILE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 16-04 AND
ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
AT 8449 GARVEY AVENUE AND 3014 EARLE AVENUE.
(APN: 5288-004-041 AND 5288-004-057). IN A MEDIUM
COMMERCIAL. WITH RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OVERLAYS (C-
3/RC-MUDO/D-O) ZONE
Community Development Director Kim reported the applicant submitted a Design
Review application to construct a new residential/commercial mixed-use
development at 8449 Garvey Avenue and 3014 Earle Avenue. The project would
consist of 35 residential apartment units and 7,520 square feet of commercial floor
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of February 27. 2018
Page 5 of 12
area, six of those units would be allocated for affordable housing. The project site
is located in a Medium Commercial with Residential/Commercial Mixed-Use
Development and Design Overlays zone.
Council Member Clark asked for clarification on how the line of site issue was
being mitigated for the residential properties behind the project.
Community Development Director Kim explained the line of site, or the vertical
variable height did not apply to commercial zone areas. The residential property
behind the project is commercial zone and not residential zone.
Council Member Armenta clarified projects usually have residential in the back and
commercial in the front, this project is just reversed.
Council Member Clark inquired if the zone of the homes was changed after the
residential homes were built. She expressed concern in having a 55 foot building
next to a residential home and invading their privacy.
Community Development Director Kim explained the two homes in the rear of the
project are commercial zoned and the building of the project is an L shape and the
55 foot height is not to the full width of the project site.
Council Member Armenta reiterated the building will not impact the homes in the
back because the stories of the building are not going to be directly in front those
homes.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly asked if the homes were on a residential zone,how would have
the variable height requirement been affected.
Community Development Director Kim replied the he was not sure since the
properties are all commercial zone, the project was not designed to meet height
requirements.
Council Member Armenta asked if the two homes are owned privately or by a
corporation.
Community Development Director Kim replied staff did not have the owner
information.
Council Member Clark asked if the residents were notified of the new project
behind them.
Community Development Director Kim answered affirmatively, residents were
notified during the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting about
the project.
Council Member Clark asked if there were drawings of how far back the project
building is and the effect on those properties.
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and.Joint Meeting
Minutes ofFebruarr 27, 2018
Page 6 of 12
Council Member Armenta asked if staff received any complaints or concerns from
the nearby residents of the project.
Community Development Director Kim replied no complaints or concerns were
received by staff.
Mayor Low open the public hearing at 7:53 p.m.
Mike Lewis stated the applicant had also tried to acquire two parcels north of the
project because they are mixed use zone. Therefore, another similar project could
be built with the same height. He explained one of the adjacent parcels is L shape
and both are owned by a corporation. One home has a warehouse facility in the
back operating as a commercial facility.
Council Member Armenta interjected that it's consistent that homes with
commercial areas are usually owned by corporations.
Mr. Lewis clarified there was plenty of parking spaces and vehicles would enter off
Earle Avenue, there are no entrances on and off Garvey Avenue that would create
traffic. There is a density bonus on the project due to the six affordable units, and
there are two concessions that were requested on height and land use since the
project maxed at 1/3 of the commercial percentage.
Council Member Armenta asked if the highest point is the facade of the building.
Mr. Lewis replied portions will be the elevator shaft, but it varied on height.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly asked if the applicant was amenable to an additional condition
of approval, to attempt to get national and regional recognized commercial tenants.
Mr. Lewis responded the project is an attractive building and may attract national
chain tenants.
Mayor Low closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m.
City Attorney Richman stated if the developer agrees that efforts will be made to
engage leases with regional or national tenants it could be added in the conditions.
Community Development Director Kim assured Condition No. 26 had similar
language as Mr. Ly suggested and staff would change the time frame from six
months to twelve months.
ACTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Ly and seconded by Council Member
Armenta to adopt Resolution No. 2018-11, adopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approving
Design Review 16-04 as amended. Motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: Armenia, Clark, Low, Ly and ABSENT: Alarcon
Rosemead Cit).Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of Februag 27, 2018
Page 7of12
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Claims and Demands
• Resolution No. 2018-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS
AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $1,102,705.09 NUMBERED
98972 THROUGH NUMBER 99080 INCLUSIVELY
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-16
• Resolution No. 2018-05 SA
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AS THE
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO TILE ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $3150.00 NUMBERED 10236
INCLUSIVLEY
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No.2018-05 SA
B. City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the minutes from the regular
meeting on December 12,2017.
C. Housing Element 2017 Annual Progress Report
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the
City's 2017 Housing Element Annual Progress Report.
D. Walnut Grove Avenue Resurfacing Project - Award of Contract for Design
Consulting
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City
Manager to enter into a contract with EC + Associates Engineering for design
engineering services of the Walnut Grove Avenue Resurfacing Project in the
amount of$ 44,900.
F. Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Global Urban Strategies,Inc.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve an Amendment to the
Professional Services Agreement with Global Urban Strategies, Inc., for $30,000,
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes oJ.February 20, 2018
Page 8 of 12
a total contract amount not to exceed $60,000, for outreach, education, and
advocacy services for the City of Rosemead as it pertains to the 710 Coalition.
City Attorney Richman announce that Council Member Clark had a conflict of
interest to item E,adoption of Ordinance No.978. And that the record would reflect
that she would abstain on item E.
ACIION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Ly and seconded by Council Member
Armenia to approved Consent Calendar items A,B,C,D,and F. Motion was carried
by the following vote: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly and ABSENT: Alarcon
E'. Ordinance No. 978 — Second Reading and Adoption
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the second
reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 978.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 14-01
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, APPROVING
MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 14-02 AMENDING
VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 17,AND ADDING CHAPTER
17.21 — GARVEY AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN, ADOPTING
SPECIFIC PLAN 14-01
ACTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Ly and seconded by Council Member
Armenta to approved Consent Calendar item E. Motion was carried by the
following vote: AYES: Armenta. Low. Ly; ABSTAIN: CLARK and ABSENT:
Alarcon
7. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER& STAFF
A. Street Sweeping Contract Extension
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorized a two-year
extension(July 1,2018—June 30.2020)with Athens Services in an annual amount
not to exceed$225,000, which includes a onetime 2.97% CPI increase.
Director of Public Works Ramirez reported the City Council approved a three year
agreement with Athens Services for Citywide street sweeping services. The
agreement was set to expire on June 30, 2018. In accordance with the agreement,
the City and Athens Services may agree to extend the term of the agreement for up
to two additional years. Athens Services has requested a two year extension under
the current terms and conditions, with an adjustment of 2.97% for the Consumer
Price Index. The new annual contract amount would be $225,000 with an
expiration date of June 30, 2020.
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of February 27, 20/8
Page 9 of 12
Tommy Ou Zoonian representative of Athens Services introduced himself and
thanked the City for letting them provide a service to the residents.
Council Member Armenta commended Athens on their customer service how great
and Mr. Ed Chen has responded to concerns brought by her.
ACTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Ly and seconded by Council Member
Armenta to authorize a two-year extension (July 1, 2018 — June 30, 2020) with
Athens Services in an annual amount not to exceed $225,000, which includes a
onetime 2.97% CPI increase. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES:
Armenta, Clark Low, Ly and ABSENT: Alarcon
B. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Mid-Year Budget Review
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Receive and file the Mid-Year Budget Review and related reports; and
2. Approve Resolution No. 2018-15,approving various appropriations and revise
revenue estimates.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIOUS
APPROPRIATIONS
Director of Finance Lieu reported on the mid-year budget review requiring
additional appropriations, as well as a revised revenue projection. Staff was
requesting for an additional general fund appropriation of $496,000; a revised
revenue projection to include increase general fund revenue by $125,000; and to
reduce the GAS tax revenue projections of$943,300 in federal grants, which would
be budgeted for fiscal year 2018-2019.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly thanked Finance Director Lieu on the recent award received for
the finance of the City and her efforts in keeping on line with the budget.
Council Member Armenta asked which California Cities membership was being
referenced in the mid-year budget review on page 2.
Director of Finance Lieu replied that the membership was for the Revitalized
California Cities membership.
ACTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Ly and seconded by Council Member Clark
to receive and file the Mid-Year Budget Review and related reports; and approve
Resolution No. 2018-15. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES:
Armenta, Clark Low, Ly and ABSENT: Alarcon
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of February 27, 2018
Page 10 of 12
R. MATTERS FROM MAYOR& CITY COUNCIL
A. City Council Comments
Council Member Clark reported she was absent at the last council meeting due to a
trip to Israel with the Southern California Association of Governments. She added
the Israel delegation came to the United States last year and invited the association
to the Muni Word Convention in February. The first day they talked about cyber
security, how sophisticated scammers and hackers are.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly requested data on homelessness in the parks and how the city
is addressing the issue and what methods are being used to enforce the park curfew.
Council Member Armenta stated she would be completing her one year fellowship
to the WELL Untapped program and she was attending a legislative briefing on
water and the human right to water issues. She reported the program was all paid
through the fellowship program. Second, she read a letter of a resident dated
February 27th,2018 regarding safety concerns of their street and neighborhood she
received.
The resident expressed concerns with an Airbnb business operating at 9542 Ralph
Street and renting rooms at $20 a night. The police have been called due to
suspicious activities of people staying at the Airbnb and unusual activity of cars
during the hours of 11:00 p.m.to 7:30 p.m. Other concerns include the safety of the
nearby Savannah Elementary School and children having to walk by the business
to go to school. The lack of public parking has impacted the neighborhood,
especially during trash pick-up days.
Mrs. Armenta described a picture showing at least ten vehicles stacked at the
Airbnb property and stated the city should look into policies or restrictions on
Airbnb businesses.
Council Member Clark asked staff if there are ordinances addressing the Airbnb
businesses and what were other cities doing.
Community Development Director Kim stated Airbnb has been an issue all over
the country and large tourist cities have been adopting ordinances taxing and
treating them like hotels. The city code does not address the current Airbnb issue.
City Manager Molleda asked Council Member Armenta to forward the email and
pictures to her office to have staff review the issue.
Council Member Armenta asked if code enforcement could look into the legality
of the business.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly suggested to Council Member Armenta to speak to Community
Development Director Kim to discuss the issue.
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of February 27, 2018
Page 11 of 12
Mayor Low stated she recalled a conversation in the past about a project design
competition and asked staff to look into it to encourage projects to come in to the
city.
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m. The next regular City Council meeting is scheduled to
take place on March 27, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. in the Rosemead City Hall Council Chamber.
Ericka Hernandez, Acting City Clerk
Approved:
Polly Low, Mayor
Rosemead City Council and the Successor Agency to the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Special and Joint Meeting
Minutes of February 27, 2018
Page 12 of 12