The URL can be used to link to this page

CC – Item 2A – Staff Report Res. 98-04 Adoption of Household Hazardous Waste Element and Mitigated Negative Declaration � ,� � start eport TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER € DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1998 RE: RESOLUTION NO. 98-4 - ADOPTION OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Last December, Rosemead was one of more 200 cities that received notification from the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) that it was required to readadopt its Household Hazardous Waste Element. Many cities,it appears either never adopted that element when originally required, or did not complete the process in a manner acceptable to the Waste Management Board. It should be noted, however, that the City Council did adopt an HHW Element in August 1992. However, CIWMB staff has determined that the plan required review and comments from the Los Angeles County Solid Waste Management Committee/Integrated Waste Management Task Force prior to submittal to the Board. Accordingly, last December, the City submitted the HHW Element (as adopted by the Council in 1992) to the Task Force and has received comments. The Task Force accepted the Element with two minor changes. The first change is a phone number that has been updated recently. The second change is the addition of language which states that if the City should choose the conduct its own household hazardous waste program in the future,it would make general favid dollars available for the program. Both changes have been incorporated in the original HI IW Element. A copy of the Task Force's comments has been attached. The HHW, as the Council is aware, mainly represents the formalization of the City of Rosemead's policy of participating in the existing Household Hazardous Waste Collection program sponsored by the Integrated Waste Management Districts of Los Angeles County. The current program is funded by a landfill tipping surcharge adopted by the District, and it is anticipated that the program will be continued into the foreseeable future. The public hearing required for the adoption of this document has been advertised and the document has been available for review in City Hall. To date, staff has received no requests to review the document and has received no comments. COUNCIL AGENDA Fc8 1 © 1998 ITEM No. 1/ • 4 HHW Public Hearing February 3, 1998 Page 2. Attached is Resolution No. 98-4, a copy of the Negative Declaration and a copy of the proposed HHW Element. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct the public hearing, receive comments from the public and adopt Resolution No. 98-4. «mcmo hhwzfgt RESOLUTION NO. 98-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE(HFIW)ELEMENT AND REQUIRED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead is required under the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 to prepare and submit program plans for the management and disposal of Household Hazardous Waste; and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Household Hazardous Waste Element("Exhibit A"),as required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and forwarded that document to the State Clearinghouse for Agency review; and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead prepared a Household Hazardous Waste Element (attached as "Exhibit B"), submitted that document to the Los Angeles County Solid Waste Management Committee/Integrated Waste Management Task Force and updated the Element in accordance with the Task Force's comments;and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead scheduled and advertised a public hearing for consideration of the HH W Element, as required by state law, and made the document available for review for the mandated period. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rosemead City Council resolves as follows: Section 1. The Rosemead City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration (attached as "Exhibit A"). Section 2. The Rosemead City Council adopts the Household Hazardous Waste (HH W) Element (attached as "Exhibit B") and authorizes staff to forward the document to the California Integrated Waste Management District for approval. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK "Exhibit A" CEQA APPENDIX G ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1 . Project Title: Adoption of the City of Rosemead Household Hazardous Waste Element 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rosemead Planning Department 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Peter Lyons, Director of Planning (626) 288-6671 4. Project Location: City of Rosemead County of Los Angeles, State of California Assessor Parcel NumberIs): N/A 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 6. General Plan Designation: N/A 7. Zoning: N/A 8. Description of the Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Adoption of the City of Rosemead Household Hazardous Waste Element 9. Surrounding Land uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings) The City of Rosemead is an urban suburb located in the San Gabriel Valley, 10 miles east of the City of Los Angeles. It is bounded on the north by the cities of Temple City and San Gabriel, on the west by South San Gabriel, on the south by Montebello, plus by El Monte and South El Monte on the east. The city is 5.5 square miles or 2,344 acres in size. Rosemead is home to a resident population of approximately 55,128 people. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g. permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). California Integrated Waste Management Board Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below ( V ) would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Hazards & Hazardous Public Services Materials Agriculture Resources Hydrology/Water Recreation Quality Air Quality Land Use/Planning Transportation/Traffic Biological Resources Mineral Resources Utilities/Service Systems Cultural Resources Noise Mandatory Findings of Significance Geology/Soils Population/Housing DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and ✓ a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potential significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, inclu . rev fd or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project., nothing fu er is r gmrec. az -�a9� Signa nne Date < / Printed Name For EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e. g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e. g.the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 2 • 3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section 17 at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones. 9) The analysis of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Issues and Supporting Information Sources potentially potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ✓ b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock ✓ outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the ✓ site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would ✓ adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? ✓ • b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ✓ • c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in ✓ loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 3. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air ✓ Quality Abatement Plan or Congestion Management Plan? b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to ✓ an existing or projected air quality violation? 3 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Cl Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which V exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? di Create or contribute to a non-stationary source "hot spot" (primarily carbon monoxide)? ✓ el Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? V f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? V 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Adversely impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, any endangered, rare, or threatened species, as listed in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (Sections 670.2 or 670.5) or V in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (Sections 17.11 or 17.12)? b) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, V policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and V Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? d) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other V activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? e) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery `' sites? f) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? g) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, other approved local, V regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of ✓ Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? bl Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific V research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? V di Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ✓ 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: it Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence V of a known fault? ill Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? V iv) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflows? V 4 Landslides? vi) Flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ✓ vii) Wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas and where residences are intermixed with ✓ wildlands? b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? V c) Would the project result in the loss of a unique geologic feature? V di Is the project located on strata or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially ✓ result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? e) Is the project located on expansive soil creating substantial risks V to life or property? f) Where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water, is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative ✓ waste water disposal systems? 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous ✓ materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the V environment? c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste V within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The City is involved with the Los Angeles County Household Hazardous Waste collection effort. This consists of mobile collection sites (24 annually) at various locations countywide. Primary personnel responsible for handling and disposing of waste are County Public Works and Swanitation District employees. Depending on the site-locations selected by the County Department of Public Works, some of these sites may be at schools. To minimize harmful effects, personnel handling wastes will be trained in the proper procedures and equipped with approved safety materials. In addition the dates for the material pickup will be on weekend dates when schools are not in session. 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated dl Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code ✓ Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public ✓ airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? I) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in V the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? t/ h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to ✓ urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality ✓ standards or waste discharge requirements? Ea) Substantially degrade groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing ✓ nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, ✓ in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, ✓ or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? el Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to ✓ control? 1) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or ✓ other flood hazard delineation map? g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede ✓ or redirect flood flows? 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? V 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Then No Signiflcent Significant Significant Impact Issues unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or V zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? ✓ 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to V the region and the residents of the state? IA Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific V plan or other land use plan? 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise V ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? ✓ c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ✓ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the V project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people ✓ residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to ✓ excessive noise levels? 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ✓ (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ✓ c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ✓ 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantially adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? V bl Police protection? V ? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially potentially Lee. Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Issue. Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated c) Schools? dl Parks? V el Other public facilities? ✓ 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical V deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? bl Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse V physical effect on the environment? 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the ✓ volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Significant participation in collection efforts may lead to localized negative traffic impacts. To alleviate this situation, sites for HHW drop-off will be selected based upon an ability to accommodate large numbers of vehicles. bl Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management V agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in area traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in ✓ substantial safety risks? dl Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses le. 9. farm ✓ equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? V fl Result in inadequate parking capacity? V g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ✓ 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? ✓ b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental ✓ effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of V which could cause significant environmental effects? dl Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded V entitlements needed? S • Issues and Supporting Information Sources potentially potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Issues Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the ✓ project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity ✓ to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ✓ community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the ✓ disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or V indirectly? - 9 "Exhibit B" o-t � • �.. City of Rosemead a1/4146.pp :. 1 • �' m OUSEHOLD - HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT Submitted by: CAA/G BB 6866 Verde Ridge Road Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. Gershman, Brickner and Bratton, Inc. HHWE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The City has prepared the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) to comply with AB 2707. This bill mandates all cities in California draft a plan indicating how they will manage the household hazardous waste (HHW) generated within their jurisdiction. This document was prepared with two main purposes: 1) to choose a program which will properly treat, reduce, recycle or dispose of HHW in an environmentally safe manner; and 2) fulfill the first purpose as efficiently and cost effectively as possible. SELECTED PROGRAM As mandated by the regulations, the City evaluated a number of alternatives. The City has chosen to participate in the Countywide HHW Program. This program will be jointly operated by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW) and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (San Districts). The Countywide program has not received final approval from the board of supervisors, however, this approval is expected in the fall of 1991 . The Countywide program will include mobile collections at 24 locations annually, (twice each year). A semi-trailer will transport a technically advanced mobile facility to each location where it will accept HHW's for one or two days. The program will be paid for by a countywide surcharge ($.56 per ton) on the disposal of solid waste at landfills and transformation facilities. This cost will inevitably be passed on to all residents and businesses in their waste bill. To the cities which participate in this program the DPW and San Districts will: 1 ) provide for the collection and disposal of HHW's generated in the cities; 2) provide some public education (the cities should augment this with their own program); and 3) provide the necessary data for the cities to complete their annual updates. • HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page 1 INTRODUCTION 5 Purpose of Study 5 Methodologies to Complete the HHWE 7 Organization of the HHWE 7 2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 9 Short Term Goals and Objectives 9 Medium Term Goals and Objectives 10 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 1 Types and Quantities of HHW 11 Existing Programs Description 11 4 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 1 6 Collection Alternative 16 Evaluation Criteria 2 8 5 SELECTION OF HHW PROGRAM 3 0 Selected Program 3 2 Contingency Program 3 4 6 HHWE IMPLEMENTATION 3 5 LIST OF EXHIBITS Title Pace Exhibit 1. Common Household Hazardous Materials 6 Exhibit 2. Waste Generated by Waste Source 12 Exhibit 3. Waste Composition 13 Exhibit 4. Community Contact Checklist 26 Exhibit 5. Environmental Labeling 28 Exhibit A-1. States With Permanent HHW Programs Appendix Exhibit A-2. Alternative Cleaners Appendix 3 1 INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF STUDY The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB • 939 and amendment legislation) requires all cities in California to prepare and submit program plans for the proper management and disposal of Household Hazardous Waste (HHW). The purpose of the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) is to specify the means by which the City will safely collect, recycle, treat, and dispose of HHW's generated by households in the City. (The City evaluated a • number of possible methods to comply with the law.) The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines hazardous waste as that waste (or combination of wastes) which because of quantity, concentration, physical, chemical or infectious characteristics either: (1) Cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness; or, (2) Pose a substantial or potential hazard to human health or environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed. According to California State Law, Household Hazardous Wastes (HHW) are those wastes resulting from products purchased by the general public for household use which, because of their quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics, may pose a substantial known or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, disposed, or otherwise managed. Exhibit 1 contains examples of HHW discarded in the community. 5 B. METHODOLOGIES TO COMPLETE THE HHWE The HHWE determines which specific steps will need to be taken to accomplish the tasks of recycling, source reduction, and proper, safe disposal of HHWs. The HHWE does the following: • Review existing HHW plans, and establish goals and objectives of the City • Present alternatives that will meet objectives • Discuss alternatives and make recommendations • Configure time line and cost schedule • Plan a monitoring and evaluating system All possible alternatives for meeting state objectives were evaluated according to the criteria mandated in the regulations. A numerical rating system was used to evaluate and compare proposed alternatives. Based on many different criteria including costs and technical requirements (see Table 5-1). Those alternatives with the highest ratings are the most feasible to implement. C. ORGANIZATION OF THE HHWE The HHWE is structured as follows: Household Hazardous Waste Element - Goals and Objectives Section 2 - Existing Conditions Section 3 - Evaluation of Alternatives Section 4 - Selection of HHW Program Section 5 - HHWE Implementation Section 6 - Monitoring and Evaluation Section 7 - Education and Public Information Section 8 - Funding Section 9 7 2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The City has selected the following goals and objectives to properly manage HHW generated within the City. These are divided into the short and medium terms. Short Term Goals and Objectives Short Term Goal (by 1995) To divert and or properly dispose of the HHW currently being generated in the City to the maximum extent possible. This will be done through source reduction, recycling, treatment, public education, and approved landfill disposal. Also, the City has targeted an awareness level of 70% of the population to be informed regarding HEW issues as a goal specific to public education. Corresponding Objectives To reach the short term goal the City will meet the following objectives: Promote markets for recycled HHW through City procurement of items such as refined waste motor oil, recycled paint, and batteries by 1994. Cooperate with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW) and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (San Districts) on establishment and operation of a permanent HHW program. To participate in the Countywide current collection program which offers the safe collection, treatment, recycling, and disposal of HHW generated in the jurisdiction. 9 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS A. TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF HHW The regulations indicate that cities should identify the types and quantities of HHWs that are currently source reduced, collected, recycled, treated and/or disposed through existing programs. The HHW categories to be identified include: flammable materials, pesticides, corrosives, oxidizers, and miscellaneous (batteries, etc.). It is currently impossible to quantify this information as it has not been kept to this point. A solid waste generation analysis was conducted to characterize the solid waste disposed and generated in the City. Results of the study are summarized in Exhibit 2, while Exhibit 3 presents the waste composition data. Currently, about 219 tons of HHW are generated in the City annually. This number was derived from the City's waste generation study which provided the total waste generated and the percentage of the wastestream comprised of HHW. This waste is recycled, disposed at HHW round-ups, landfilled, or illegally disposed. The 219 tons of HHW represents less than one percent of the municipal solid waste stream. The information obtained from past round-ups or established diversion programs is inadequate to identify the approximate quantity of HHW diverted in 1990. It is not possible to estimate the percent of HHW that is being diverted from landfill disposal at this time. There is insufficient data to draw any conclusions or make assumptions regarding the diversion or proper disposal of HHW generated in the City. B. EXISTING PROGRAMS DESCRIPTION ROUND-UPS Since there is only a limited number of facilities that accept HHW, the County has been conducting large scale collection events which allow residents to bring their HHWs to a designated location on a 11 EXHIBIT 3 WASTE CON POSITION Waste Generation by Sector Industrial 13% /i j Residential 41% L . Commercial 46% Other Wastes Yard Waste Metals Glass Other Organics 11 k. Plastics "/// O � Paper Other Wastes Other Organics t. Yard Waste Ort Plastics ®t Metals 1 . Glass — ` ' i':Np ,,.f..'iJ X'w' Paper 13 FIXED LOCATIONS Another method some HHWs are collected and recycled is through local business establishments. There are gas stations in the area which are willing accept up to 5 gallons of motor oil per day per customer. Car batteries and antifreeze are also accepted for recycling or disposal at certain locations. TRANSPORTATION Residents are allowed to transport less than 50 pounds or five gallons of HHW in a single trip without being subject to extensive state and federal hazardous waste regulations. The HHW must be recycled, or properly disposed at a permitted hazardous waste facility (Class I). Non-hazardous municipal solid wastes are disposed in non-hazardous waste landfills (Class III). Since a Class III landfill cannot accept hazardous wastes of any quantity (according to California regulations) residential trash containing HHW cannot be landfilled there. 15 • account for all the HHWs which go through the facility. Permanent sites are convenient for the public and less hazardous than round- ups, but are quite intensive in capital costs. The money needed to begin a permanent site can be recovered over a period from 5 to 25 years. At a permanent facility the incoming load is much slower and more uniform than at the periodic round-ups. No expensive consultants are needed, and the HHWs can be stored in larger quantities (which saves on unit disposal costs). These sites can be located on publicly owned properties such as public works yards, fire stations, or waste transfer stations. 3. MOBILE COLLECTION Mobile collection provides a great level of accessibility for the residents. Trailer mounted collection facilities have been developed which can be easily moved from site to site. Possible siting locations include Fire Department and Public Works yards, Fairgrounds, high schools and shopping centers. A regular schedule of locations and times is developed and circulated in the community. Existing programs indicate the majority of residents using a program are those that live closest to the collection point. Convenience is a big factor to the success of a mobile program. 4. LOCAL EFFORTS TO ENCOURAGE OTHER COLLECTION PROGRAMS As an alternative the City can make efforts and take actions to encourage the formation of various other collection programs. The City could contract with companies to provide these services, and would publicize the program in conjunction with other public education campaigns. These programs could be publicly or privately operated and include fee-for-service, door-to-door, or curbside collection. 17 Exposure to liability and relative risk is much greater than other collection options. The possibility of a health hazard for humans, animals, or plant life is high. LOCAL EFFORTS AND ACTIONS The private sector can be encouraged to form and operate local HHW collection programs. A variety of education and action programs, promoted through retailers, schools, agencies, businesses and individuals, offer short- and long-term collection. Examples include: Store buy-back programs which encourage citizens to bring back unused hazardous products for a refund or discount on their next purchase. Used oil and auto batteries can be returned to retailers for recycling and re-use. Latex paint can be collected by paint retailers, and non-profit organizations for recycling and re-use. An Environmental Stewardship concept can be developed; this implies that manufacturers take responsibility for their products throughout their life cycle. As an example, special packaging can be included with a hazardous product to allow its safe return to the manufacturer for reuse or disposal. 5. LOAD CHECKING/MONITORING There are two points where solid waste is checked for HHW: at the source as the waste is collected, and at the landfill. 19 E. permanent collection facilities, or at-source collection programs. Typically, recycling alternatives focus on waste motor oil, paints, and batteries. By recycling HHW, the City can divert these materials from disposal and help preserve precious resources. A description of these recycling efforts is contained below. The potential for even higher recycling rates exists as new developments in technology arrive in the market place. Local waste reclamation and recycling centers are listed in the Appendix (7). CITY FACILITY The City does not plan to have its own facility. Any City run drop-off location would collect only recyclable materials. These services can be operated in very small areas, depending on which materials are collected. The costs involved in starting operations are minimal, and since all materials collected are recyclable the disposal costs are low. The development of a recycling program such as this would allow the City to move quickly to divert HHW through recycling for a minimum cost. A bill in the legislature proposes to make cities exempt from fees and liability for initiating HHW programs collecting common materials, including auto batteries, latex paint, used oil and anti- freeze. Waste Motor Oil At used oil drop-centers located at gas stations, shopping centers, or permanent collection facilities, the oil is collected from consumers and then picked-up by a recycler. The facility would need to train its personnel to determine whether or not incoming oil is contaminated with solvents, water, or antifreeze, or other hazardous waste materials. Contaminated oil cannot be readily recycled and needs to be stored separately and managed as a non-recyclable hazardous waste. 21 7. COUNTYWIDE HHW MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DPW and San Districts are proposing a HHW program in the short and medium term which would include mobile collections at 24 different locations annually (twice each year). The proposal includes using a semi-trailer that would transport a technically advanced mobile facility to each of the locations. This program would be paid for by an proposed surcharge of 56 cents per ton on the disposal of solid waste at local area landfills and transformation facilities. (This cost would undoubtedly be passed on to the residents in their waste bill.) With this program, the DPW and San Districts would; 1) provide the collection and disposal of the materials, 2) implement the public education campaign, and 3) provide the necessary data for the cities to complete their annual updates. This program is yet to receive final approval by the sanctioning bodies (the item has been carried over until August). It is expected that the Countywide program will be approved in August or September of 1991, with the funding mechanism in place by September or October. Realistically it will be 12 to 24 months from the time the funding mechanism is in place until the mobile collection program begins. Until then, the DPW and San Districts will continue the 1-111W round-up program. If cities choose not to be included in the Countywide program, they will receive a rebate of the 56 cents/ton surcharge (minus an administration fee). The amount of rebate will be based on the amount of waste generated in the City that is disposed of in any solid waste management facilities as indicated in a cities' adopted SRRE. In the medium term the Countywide program will evaluate establishment of a permanent facility. 23 media presentations such as videos on HHW issues. Visual aids may be produced in several languages to increase city-wide public knowledge regarding HHW issues. (FY 1993) The City would promote the inclusion of HHW issues in local educational curricula. HHW source reduction and recycling activities would be implemented in area schools to help students and school personnel practice every day HHW management. (FY 1992) Businesses would be encouraged to provide promotional campaigns and educational material displays on the recycling and re-usability of hazardous household products. (FY 1993) The City would develop a media relations package including a recycling "press kit" for local print and broadcast media which includes a description of the HHW goals and programs, information about HHW issues, available recycling activities, and lists of further sources of information. The kit would be distributed to area newspapers, television and cable stations, and radio stations. The City would initiate discussions with other cities to develop the media relations materials in order to achieve cost savings. (FY 1992) The City would direct information to existing community leaders (civic, environmental, trade, service organizations, etc.,) to provide support for collection drives and the dissemination of HHW information. A list of organizations that the City would approach for support and/or sponsorship of their education efforts is provided in Exhibit 4. These leaders would be enlisted to educate the citizens within their spheres of influence. FY (1992) The City would develop a speakers bureau which would be staffed by trained volunteers and/or City personnel. Notices would be distributed to citizen groups and business 25 Elks, Lions, etc. Senior citizen federations/clubs OTHER Private recyclers Trash haulers Interested citizens Development of environmental labeling ordinances which alert the public to possible dangers in the use and disposal of the products selected. Exhibit 5 gives samples of environmental labels being used for some products in the U.S. EXHIBIT 5 ENVIRONMENTAL LABELS Do not place in Give to a hazardousrasn T waste collection [tel �� Program Should nit . /��1 Flush with extra fl pour m atn \ w si di Rwecyde the `al Place in the Trash The programs listed would be continued into the medium term. The public education materials would continue to be made available to the public. Public education campaigns will be evaluated and revised in the medium term. 27 TABLE 4-1 Summary of Evaluation for Each Alternative by Criterion Alternative Countywide Periodic Education Mobile Recycling Program Collection and Public Collection Programs Criteria Information (By City) Potential Hazard Traffic Traffic Minimal impact Traffic Worker safety System Flexibility Able to adapt Able to adapt Able to adapt Able to adapt Able to adapt to Accomodate change to waste to waste with minimal to waste waste volume volume and changes effort changes changes type changes es to yes to yes to yes to Implementable In yes th y both both both both the short term & both the medium term Facility No new facility No new facility No new facility No newfacility No neww facility Requirements needs needs needs needs eeds Consistency with Consistent with Consistent with Consistent with Consistent with hierarchy Consistent hierarchy withy Local Policy hierarchy hierarchy hierarchy Institutional Minimal Minimal Minimal Minimal Minimal Barriers Total Cost Inexpensive to Expensive to Low cost if Expensive to 1. Cost of labor City operate performed operate jointly with 2. Private sector other cities Usually 3. Low revenue End Uses Materials to be Materials to be Minimal Materials to ecysltd be Mateecysl tdrials o be recycled, and recycled waste exchange 29 TABLE 5-1 Numerical Rating for Alternatives Alternative Countywide Periodic Education Mobilo Recycling Program Collection and Public Collection Programs Criteria Information (By City) Waste Reduction 3 2 3 3 3 Effectiveness Potential Hazard • • • 3 3 3 3 3 System Flexibility Accomodate change 3 3 3 3 3 Implementable In the short term & 3 1 3 1 1 the medium term Facility Requirements 3 2 3 2 2 Consistency with - Local Policy 3 2 3 2 2 Institutional Barriers 3 1 3 1 2 Total Cost 3 1 2 1 2 End Uses 3 3 2 3 3 Total Points 27 18 25 19 21 Rank 1 - 5 2 4 3 ••• All hazards will be controlled, negative declarations will indicate that there is no hazard. 31 Prepare program reports and evaluations Coordinate public education program The City will publicize the dates, times, locations, and all pertinent information regarding when the mobile drop-off center will be located near the community. Residents will not need a special permit in order to bring HHWs to the mobile collection facility (for up to 5 gallons or 50 pounds of material). The staff will be trained in the proper identification, handling, and packing of wastes collected. The HHW vehicle will take the recyclable materials to a facility for recycling, and the remaining to a permitted facility for ultimate disposal and/or treatment. No facilities would need to be built or expanded in order to participate in the selected program. As there is no documentation of how much material has been diverted from the City in the past, it is impossible to predict the types and quantities of HHWs which will be collected, recycled, and disposed. In 1991 the City will lobby area recyclers to start an accounting system of the amount and type of HHW collected from each City. This will be easy to implement as generators can fill out a simple form stating the type, quantity, and city of origin of the HHW they are recycling. The materials which will be the most recycled is waste motor oil. The Agencies will take the oil to any of a number of regional recycling centers, refineries, or use it an alternative fuels program. Any paints could be made available to appropriate agencies for use on low-income housing, neighborhood redevelopment, graffiti abatement, and recycling. All recyclable or reusable materials will be recycled/reused to the maximum extent feasible through recycling, materials exchange, and alternative fuels blending programs. The Agencies will perform a public education campaign in conjunction with their program. The City's public education program 33 6 HHWE IMPLEMENTATION Implementation of the HHW program alternatives is discussed below and includes the following: responsible parties, implementation tasks and schedule, and costs/revenues. The City's selected program will be administered and implemented by the designated HHW coordinator. This will be the Recycling Coordinator. Ultimate responsibility for the City's HHW program lies with the City Manager's office. As the City has selected to participate in the Countywide program, the Agencies will be responsible for the implementation of that program, while the City will be responsible for participating in the program. To implement the selected program, the City will notify the Agencies officially by the end of 1991 that they intend to participate in the Countywide program. (The DPW will already be aware of this as the result of Local Task Force obtaining this HHWE). The City will designate a staff person to be the HHW coordinator by September 1991. This person's duties are discussed in Chapter 5. The City will also begin their public education program by including information regarding HHW in the City newsletter by the end of 1991. The rest of the public education efforts will be performed according to the dates indicated in Chapter 4. Table 6-1 shows the implementation schedule in matrix form. Within four months of the approval of the Countywide program the City will sign an agreement with the Agencies to the effect that the Agencies will provide the program, and the City will cooperate with them and also help promote the program. The City intends to utilize all technical assistance available through the State and the Agencies to implement its HHW program. 35 Table 6-2 covers the costs, revenues, and sources of revenue as estimated for the implementation of the selected program. These are costs to the City which are not included in the tipping surcharge. The revenues will be generated from a portion of the City's solid waste management fee, or other City funds. TABLE 6-2 STAFF COSTS FOR PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ALTERNATIVE COSTS REVENUES REVENUE SOURCES Countywide FY 1992: $2,500/yr FY 1992: $2,500 Solid Waste Collection City Funds Recycling 1992-1994: $0 Solid Waste Fee Program 1995: $5,000/yr FY 1995: $5,000 City Funds (contingency) (if implemented) Public FY 1992: $2,000/yr FY 1992: $2,000 Solid Waste Fee Education City Funds Solid Waste Fee Monitoring FY 1992: $2,000/yr FY 1992: $2,000 City Funds 37 program, a community survey will be conducted and the results incorporated in the overall HHWE report. B. EVALUATION • Successful HHW management programs require an effective public education campaign and an efficient and convenient collection system. The program will be considered successful if there is: - A measured reduction of the material to landfill - A measured increased diversion of material to other sectors - A favorable general response from the citizenry - A measured increased amount of HHW properly disposed as indicated by the data from the Agencies. • Recordkeeping will be important to track the City's progress towards its stated HHW goals. The responsibility of the programs monitoring, • evaluation, and reporting will lay with the City Manager's office. Most of the work will be performed by the HHW Coordinator. Monitoring and evaluation will require staff time. Waste diversion studies will include HHWs, thereby alleviating the need for other - specialized studies. The monitoring costs and revenues are shown below in Table 7-1. • TABLE 7-1 MONITORING COSTS AND REVENUES METHOD COST REVENUE REVENUE SOURCE Recordkeeping, recordkeeping device. • attendance records, $2.000/yr $2,000/yr Solid Waste Fee monitoring, and City funds operational supervision 39 8 EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION (There is supplemental information to this chapter in Appendix 8) Educational objectives The City will try to obtain a 70% awareness of the HHW round-up and collection days by 1995, and 85% by 2000. Any citizen desiring information regarding the program should be able to obtain it quickly and easily from the HHW coordinator, or a hotline. Existing program and activities Currently, the information program of the City consists of promoting local places where used oils and car batteries can be recycled. Phone numbers including a HHW hotline and a recycling hotline are also published. This information is disseminated through the City newsletter. Program implementation The Countywide HHW program indicates the Agencies will prepare public education material for distribution by the City. The Agencies will also accept liability for the HHW materials collected. The City will publicize the Countywide program events in addition to the efforts made by the Agencies. The target of the City's campaign will change over time, although it will always target the residential sector. Initially, the program will target people ages 21-60; these are they who are most likely to generate HHWs through changing motor oil, painting, exterminating bugs, etc. The campaign will be made to appeal to the majority of people in this age group. In the medium term this audience will remain targeted, but those of all ages will have information available to them which will be designed to appeal to the different audiences. The City will strive to address cultural and social barriers through 41 Table 8-2 shows an estimate of the costs which will be incurred by the public education and information program. TABLE 8-2 PUBLIC EDUCATION ACTIVITY SCHEDULE AND ANNUAL ESTIMATED COSTS (1991 ESCALATED AT 5%ANNUALLY) EXPENSECATEGORY FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000 MEDIA RELATIONS 500 525 551 579 608 638 670 704 739 PRESS CONFERENCE 250 263 276 289 304 319 335 352 369 GEN SOURCE RED. 1000 1 SLIDE SHOW 2001 1000 276 290 304 320 3351 3521 370 SOURCE RED.FLYER 1 00 01 1 1 608 1 739 RECYCLING FLYER 10001 1216 1478 FACT SHEETS 5001 5251 6081 1 WORKSHOPS 5001 5251 55d 579 6081 638 670 7041 739 TOTALS 49501 28381 16541 1737 4256 1915 20111 21111 4434 MONITORING AND EVALUATION The City will conduct a monitoring program specifically to gauge the success of the public education. Within a month of a HHW round-up or mobile collection day, the City will conduct a survey of a representative sample of the population to determine what percent of the people were aware of the collection opportunity. If the survey indicates the City did not reach an awareness level of 70% by 1995 the City will consider the performance of the public education program inadequate. Under these circumstances the City will expand the publicity of the HHWE program by increasing the frequency of the newsletters, promoting HHW collection days in the local schools, and mailing a special flyer with the waste disposal bill. 43 9 FUNDING The estimated total cost to the City to implement the HHW management plan for FY 1997/98 is $11,500, and is funded by the City's general fund. The City will participate in the Countywide HHW Program. There is no direct cost to the City. However, the Countywide program is funded by a surcharge at County landfills. This cost will be reflected in the residents' waste bill. (Note: There is no direct cost to the City to participate in the Countywide Program. However the City will incur costs which result from staff time, additional public information, and monitoring and evaluation. It is these costs which will total $11,500 in FY 1997/98. Table 9-1 shows the total cost to the City during the short term.) The City will appoint a staff person to function as a HHW coordinator. It is estimated that the coordinator duties will diminish after the first 6 months of the program. TABLE 9-1 TOTAL COSTS Alternative FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 FY 2000/01 Countywide $2,500 $2,600 $2,700 $2,800 Collection (staff time) Public Education $4,500 $2,500 $2,000 $2,000 (materials) Public Education $2,500 $2,600 $2,700 $2,800 (staff time) Monitoring $2,000 $2,100 $2,200 $2,300 (staff time) TOTAL $11,500 $9,800 $9,600 $9,900 45 APPENDIC2ES APPENDIX 1 (RECYCLING CENTERS) WASTE RECLAMATION AND RECYCLING CENTERS Name and Address Tyne of Reevclinv Waste Paper Exporter Paper 241 E. Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 818-795- 1196 Woodsy Owl Active Neighborhood Cans - Cardboard - Recycling Centers No. 1 Paper - Glass 2000 W. Slauson Ave. Los Angeles, CA 213 -295-7774 Woodsy Owl Active Neighborhood Cans - Cardboard - Recycling Centers No. 4 Paper - Glass 5601 Valley Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 213-221 -2555 Cal-West By-Products All grades of waste 1530 South Bonnie Beach Plaza Paper Los Angeles, CA 213 -264-4050 L & J Reclamation Service Inc. Scrap Paper 25601 Narbonne Ave. Lomita, CA 213 -530-8486 Allan Company All grades of waste 14618 E. Arrow Hwy Paper Baldwin Park, CA 213 -686-2608 Name and Address Tvve of Recycling - Amberwick Corp. Waste Materials 2440 Cerritos AVE. Signal Hill, CA 213-426-6503 Cal West By Products Waste Materials 1530 S. Bonnie Beach Plaza Los Angeles, CA 213 -264-4050 Commercial Waste Paper Co., Inc. Waste Paper 1734 E. 24th St. Los Angeles, CA 213-231 -4343 Sentinel Waste Management, Inc. Waste Removal & 1240 N. Simon Circle Disposal Service Anaheim, CA 800-648-9465 Premier Resources Complete Hazardous 14760 Valley Blvd. & Non-hazardous Waste City of Industry, CA 800-445- 1079 818-961 -0914 Environmental Services Hazardous Waste 1313 East 6th St. Los Angeles, CA 714-946-8000 800-777-3363 Industrial Waste Removal Hazardous and Non- Hazardous Waste Extraction 714-641 - 1530 213-283 -8821 AYFt AND)Y 2 (REPORTING FORMS) [tate of tallfomla cat fomla Is teereteo wane auoere laird HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION INFORMATION QPMB-303 (1/90) Name of Local Agency: Phone: .. Marcos: city: County: Seta: (Please Use Applicable Unice of Measurement) Wane Category Gallons Pounds - Numb.; of Number of Management .. Containers Drums (55 gal) Method A. Flammable 1. Used Oil — 2 Palace L Latex h Oil Base 3. Solvents, thinners, and =Ins 4. Gasoline and • oil (missed) S. Aerosols (excluding pesticides/ herbicide) — 6. Other -- — PIAMMA81B SUBTOTAL — .IW Pens I Tt c harem Pe'Rancid - . d t•1?Y.. tadaeeas p-yl K deasai Ps "TSit:' Mom Avss.... ' Otiv.:. �: • APPENDIX 3 (PUBLIC EDUCATION SCHEDULE AND COSTS) PUBLIC EDUCATION ACTIVITY SCHEDULE AND ANNUAL ESTIMATED COSTS (1991 ESCALATED AT 5%ANNUALLY) EXPENSE CATEGORY I FY 92 I FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000 MEDIA RELATIONS 500 525 551 579 608 638 670 704 739 PRESSCONFERENCE 250 263 276 289 3041 319 335 352 369 GEN SOURCE RED. 1000 1 SLIDE SHOW 200 1 00 01 276 290 304 320 3351 352 370 SOURCE RED.FLYER 1000 1 608 739 RECYCUNGFLYER 1 00 01 1 1216 1478 FACT SHEETS 5001 5251 6081 WORKSHOPS 500 5251 551 579 608 638 670 704 739 TOTALS 1 4950 28381 16541 17371 4256 1915 20111 21111 4434 The basic requirements for periodic events are similar with permanent sites with respect to liability, and types of collection services provided. However, funding sources, staffing and siting requirements can vary widely depending on the scope of the program. • Continuous education programs are needed with emphasis shortly before the event. Outside contractors offer a wide range of alternatives for coordinating periodic events. Costs of periodic events range. widely depending on the materials accepted, the scale of the site and if volunteer labor is available. PERMANENT FACILITIES Permanent collection sites can be located on publicly owned • properties such as public works yards, fire stations, or waste transfer stations. Permanent facilities should provide consistent service, with regular hours of operation. Permanent facilities are the wave of the future, however, costs can be high and public visibility must be maintained. Exhibit A-1 shows the total number of permanent facilities in the U.S and California. When selecting a permanent facility the following must be kept in mind. 1 ) Legal requirements for siting and handling of HHW from all levels of government as previously discussed. 2) The size and type of site needed has to be carefully planned to provide an - effective program with potential to grow:- Alltoooften a site is selected and developed only to discover it is far too small to meet the needs of the community, or citizens are reluctant to allow permanent siting. 3 ) Careful consideration must be given to the services the facility will provide. Is the facility going to separate and package collected wastes, or will oil, paint, and solvents be consolidated for transportation, etc. 4) Who will be allowed facility access? Will residents be required to show their drivers licenses to drop off hazardous wastes? Will the facility be available for use by anyone? 5) An education program is needed to develop good constant visibility. This includes P.S.A.'s, manuals, utility bill inserts, store advertising and public service group involvement. 6) Depending on the scope of the facility selected, staffing costs can be significant. Only specially trained hazardous waste technicians should handle the hazardous wastes. Several options for staffing are available. a) Fire Departments have personnel trained to respond in hazardous materials incidents. b) Existing staff or newly hired personnel can be trained in hazardous waste handling. Academic training beyond high school is not required. Health and safety consciousness is an important characteristic to possess. Training should include: ** 40 hours California Occupational Safety and Health training on hazardous materials is required. ** Training courses specifically on Hazardous Material handling such as those offered at the University of California extension services or at seminars, etc. 9) Mobile facilities are well suited for multi-jurisdictional programs as discussed earlier. Citizens can be provided with optimal service and the costs of operation can be spread among several or more jurisdictions. LOCAL COLLECTION (CURBSIDE) Most curbside household hazardous waste collection programs are operated through a contract with a private collector. Often the collector for a curbside hazardous waste program also has a contract with the local jurisdiction for regular household solid waste collection. Other communities have contracted with local non profit organizations for collection of HHW such as paint and used oil. Combined curbside collection, however, has several major drawbacks: (1 ) Operation of the program requires drivers to be California Occupational Safety Health Act trained. (2) Curbside collection is labor intensive, and program costs vary widely, depending on the types of wastes collected. (3) Special vehicles or modifications to existing vehicles are required to collect easily handled waste products such as used auto oil or latex paint. Collection equipment requirements become even more stringent as waste types to be collected are increased. (4) Careful planning is required for curbside placement of incompatible wastes. Preventing small children from playing with the hazardous materials placed at curbside _ is an important issue in curbside combined collection. (5) Exposure to liability and relative risk is much greater than other collection options. COUNTYWIDE COLLECTION The Agencies are currently proposing a Countywide collection program which would include mobile collections using a semi-trailer that would travel throughout the County stopping at 24 sites. If the Agencies can maintain proximity and frequency of service the program could prove to be successful. Many existing programs have discovered that the majority of residents that use a program are the ones that live closest to the collection point. Whether a collection point is readily used by residents is often a factor of convenience. A mobile program can bring the collection point to the residents by stopping at locations throughout the county. This should guarantee wider geographical participation than a program with a few fixed sites. SMALL OUANTITY GENERATOR (SOGI COLLECTION A SQG is a small or medium sized business which produces less than 220 lbs. (100 Kilograms) or 30 gal. of hazardous waste per month. Hazardous wastes are generated by a number of businesses that could be classified as SQG's. These businesses are grouped together under a few general categories based upon the types of hazardous wastes generated. - Appliance and Electronics - Medical & Laboratory - Arts & Crafts - Printing & Photography - Auto Dealers & Service - Transportation - Cleaning Services - Woodworking & Finishing - Communications & Utilities - Construction - Manufacturing Due to lack of information and the unavailability of HHW programs, many SQG's dump illegally. Studies in Alaska, Washington and Vermont have shown that a significant quantity of the hazardous APPENDIX (CRITERIA) The AB 2707 regulations require each alternative be considered according to mandated evaluation criteria in selecting a viable HHW program. To provide quantitative measures to evaluate the various options, the City instituted a numerical scoring system. A numerical system can over-simplify an evaluation process by not putting enough emphasis on any one factor which may be highly prohibitive. therefore, the entire evaluation does not rely only on scoring, but also on a qualitative evaluation to address potential fatal flaws or significant factors. The criteria for evaluation (as discussed in the regulations are discussed below. POTENTIAL HAZARDS Potential hazards refers to the degree of hazard that could result from implementing the alternative. Hazards could include health risks, injury, fire, or public nuisances. 1 The alternative increases the potential hazards, or they are unknown. 2 Potential hazards can be controlled with some residual impact. 3 There are no serious potential hazards or impacts. SYSTEM FLEXIBILITY System flexibility considers the alternatives ability to accommodate changing economic, technological, and social conditions. 1 The alternative has a limited ability to accommodate changing conditions. 2 The alternative is anticipated to have a moderate ability to accommodate changing conditions. 1 The alternative is significantly affected by existing barriers. 2 The alternative is moderately affected by existing barriers. 3 There are no significant barriers to the implementation of the alternative. TOTAL COST Total cost is the estimated cost related to the alternative, including capital costs and operating costs, over the lifetime of the alternative. 1 The cost to implement the alternative is high or prohibitive compared to other alternatives being considered. 2 The cost to implement the alternative is considered moderate compared to other alternatives being considered. 3 The cost to implement the alternative is low compared to other alternatives being considered. END USES Are there available end uses for the materials to be diverted by the implementation of the alternative? 1 End uses nonexistent or unreliable. 2 End uses subject to fluctuations 3 End uses exist now and are stable. • IX. The funding for project does not exceed $50.000. X Part of the grant funding is allocated to document the results of the project and to develop a how-to guide. P3 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE This questionnaire is intended to provide EPA with a profile of potential demonstration site communities and their environmental infrastructure needs. The questionnaire will enable us to determine how well the proposed projects meet our selection criteria. Please answer each question to the extent possible on separate sheets of paper. We recognize that some questions will not be relevant to every project. Name of Public Sector Contact Person: Title: Address: Phone Number: City/Town/Regional or Local Authority: State: Population Served by Facility: I . The project tests and demonstrates and innovative/alternative financing approach to the provision of environmental services which can be used by small communities. 1 . Briefly describe the project and its objective. 2. What financing approach would you be demonstrating? • IV. The financial or public-private management approach used in the project can be replicated in many other communities. 16. Is your community's problem shared by other communities in your region? Have you considered pooling .community efforts to finance/solve your problem? Has it been, or could it be, addressed by a regional authority? 17. Do you think that your proposed strategy would be useful for another community? If so, would you be willing to share your learning experiences with other communities that share a similar problem? V. The project requires EPA funding to obtain legal, financial and other expertise needed to form the partnerships. Funding would not be used to construct or design a facility or to provide engineering/ technical expertise. 18. How will the EPA grant money be used? 19. What technical expertise (i.e., financial, engineering, legal) is currently available within your local government? What further support is needed? 20. Are you interested in receiving assistance from the Corps of Engineers? If so, what kind of assistance? VI. The community elected/appointed officials and private sector participants are -enthusiastic about the project. 21 . Does this project have the support of the stakeholders within the local government and your community? If this project does not have this support, how do you propose to get it? APPENDIX 7 • (PRIVATE FUNDING) PRIVATE FUNDING/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NAME PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS/ GRANT CONTACT DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS INITIAL APPROACH AMOUNT AMOCO Grants: Awarded for urban Must submit by 5200 to S1.2 Bob L. CORPORATION programs and energy Sept. tone Million Arogenbrignt • 200 East Randolph Dr. conversation, with emphasis proposal. Notifi- Executive Chicago, II, 60601 on new initiatives. Given cation within 4 to Director 312/856-6306 Primarily in areas of corn- 6 weeks. pany representation to assist communities. Support: Operating budgets, continuing support, annual campaigns,seed money, building and equipment funds and special projects. j ANHEUSER-BUSCH Grants: The Charitable Trust Trust- proposal Trust: Cyntbia11. . CHARITABLE gives donations for Foundation-letter. $2,000 to Garrone TRUST;AND environmental protection 5721 ,000 Contribution ANHEUSER-BUSCH groups. The Foundation Application required. Admin. FOUNDATION supports conservation and Founcetion: One Busch Place public interest/civic affairs No deadline. $1 ,000 to St. Louis, Mo 63118 protects. Gives primarily in S 15,000 areas of aim pany operations. Notification within 6 to 8 weeKt. Support: Building Funds, equipment, renovation projects, capital campaigns, matching funds. APPLE COMPUTER In-Kind Gifts: Donates Letter requesting Total aid in Fred Silverman CORPORATE GIVING equipment, software, tech- application guideline 1987 was Manager PROGRAM nical support to nonprofits. $3.4 million Corporate 20525 Mariani Ave., Grants awarded to citizen Application required Grants MS:38J action for environmental Notification within Cupertino,CA 95014 protection and economic 8 to 10 weeks after 408/974-2974 development. application is Submitted NAME PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS/ GRANT CONTACT DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS INITIAL APPROACH AMOUNT CLOROX COMPANY Grants: Community funds, Letter requesting $25 to Camelia FOUNDATION civic affairs, economic application. S90,000 Johnson 1221 8roadway development Contributions Oakland,CA 94612 Deadline is 15th of • Admin. Mail to: P.O. Box Support: Building funs, certain months. 24305 operating budgets, general Oakland,CA 94623 purposes, matching funds Notification Varies. 415/271-7747 DUPONT Grants: Support of Letter, requesting Varies Peter C. CORPORATION environmental programs end application Morrow CONTRIBUTIONS specific conservation projects guidelines. Manager .PROGRAM Contributions External Affairs Dept. Support: Capital campaigns, and Community DuPont and Co. general purposes, special Affairs 8065 DuPont Bldg. projects. Wilmington, DE 19898 302/774- 1000 • EASTMAN KODAK Grants Environmental issues Letter. Total $6.8 Stanley C. COMPANY GIVING community and civic No deadline. million in Wright PROGRAM programs. Gives primarily Notification within 1987 Director 343 State Street in the area of company 2 to 4 weeks Corporate Rochester, NY 14650 operations(Mountain View, Contributions 716/724-3127 CA). Program Support: Building funds, equipment, operating budgets research, seed money, special projects EXXON CORPORATE Grants: Environmental Letter to local $5,000 to Leonard GIVING PROGRAM research, technical assistance Exxon facility or $150,000 Fleischer 1251 Avenue of the In environmental emergencies to headquarters. • Manager Americas oomm unity involvement of Contributions New York, NY 10020 cleanup efforts. No deadline. Coordination 212/333-6346 Support: Capital campaigns, equipment, research, special projects. `u1E PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS/ GRANT CONTACT - � DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS INITIAL APPROACH AMOUNT NATICNAL RECYCLING TehcnicalAssistance Support Letter requesting Varies based Edger Miller COALITION for local government develop= information on on program, 1 101 30th St. NW ing recycling programs. program. usually cover Suite 305 Mainly through peer travel and Washington,DC exchanges,NRC will select accommodations 20007 experts from own list of expert. 202/625-6406 • NATIONAL ASSOCIA- Technical Assistance: Provide Letter requesting No funding Hamilton TION OF TOWNS& resource materials to local information on provided Brawn. TOWNSHIPS governments. Mainly program. 1522 K Street, NW through guidebooks and I Suite 730 videos, Washington, DC 20005 202/737-5200 • KEEP AMERICA Information Assistance: Letter or telephone Funding may be Edward F. BEAUTIFUL (OS) Provide information on requesting informa- provided, Ayers • 9 West Broad Street various private initiatives lion on specific depending on Manager Stamford,CT 06902 to help deal effectively topics. program. Recycling& 203/323-8987 In governments with Solid Waste environmental issues. Some Services. programs include funding/ seed money. AME PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS/ GRANT CONTACT DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS INITIAL APPROACH AMOUNT CALIFORNIA I ) Discretionary grants for - S4 million total Sharon Leson INTEGRATED WASTE HHW programs that prevent available 1989/90 at 916-322 MANAGEMENT BOARD disposal of HHW in solid 8750 1020 9th Street, waste landfills. Available Suite 300 tar establishment, Implemen- Sacramento,CA talion,and expansion of 95814 programs. 2) Low interest loan program $5 million total Byron for recycling market develop-available 1991/90. Fitzgerald at ment zones to private or Si million or 50 916-327- public seosndary fxastxk percent limit on 9390 manaufecturing. Similar in loan per project nature to enterprise zones. 3) Recycling equipment tax 40 percent over 3 Same as above credit program for manufec- years; 250,000 per turers of equipment which site. produces finished products with over 50 percent recycled material. 4) R&D grants for eligible Will be established Sandra Hood at recycling programs or summer 1991. 916-327- implementation of such 9360 programs. Most likely in place by summer of 1991. educational programs. The City will also work in close association with the Agencies to publicize collection events. ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTS The City will promote an educational program to encourage safer alternatives to hazardous products. A flyer will be produced which lists alternatives to hazardous chemicals in the home. Exhibit A-2 illustrates non-hazardous alternative for typical household cleansers. A HHW program will not be successful unless residents and • businesses in the City participate in the programs aggressively. An additional goal is to ensure continued participation in HHW programs once they have been developed. To accomplish this, the City will undertake the development of informative education and public information methods. In order to be successful HHW programs must be accessible by all residents. The City will also emphasize regional programs and campaigns to achieve economies of scale in the treatment, disposal and recycling of HHW. APPENDIX 9 (THE APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 9) MORE ON FUNDING/GRANTS GRANTS The City intends to submit applications for all available grant programs. Several grant programs currently exist to help fund HHW programs. The Environmental Protection Agency has several award programs available. Grant and other financial programs are shown in Appendix 6. A list of additional technical help and financial assistance are found in Appendix 7. United States Environmental Protection Agency Region Nine. Marsha Harris 75 Hawthorne St. San Francisco, CA 94105 415-744- 1635 Contact Marsha for available funding as part of its public-private partnership program for demonstration project proposals. The L.A. County Sanitation Districts are also developing grant alternatives for HHW programs. For additional information: Joseph D. Reilly L. A. County Sanitation 1955 Workman Mill Rd. P. 0. Box 4998 Whittier, CA 90607 As previously mentioned AB 2448 mandates a grant program through the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Grant LOS ANGELES COUNTY �� SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE/ \ INTEGRATED WASTEMANAGEMENTTASKFORCE 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE, ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 r P.O. BOX 1460, ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802- 1460 HARRY W.STONE CHAIRMAN December 16, 1997 EP-4 Mr. Donald J. Wagner Assistant City Manager City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770-1787 Dear Mr. Wagner: HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE (HEW) ELEMENT REVIEW The Los Angeles County Solid Waste Management Committee/Integrated Waste Management Task Force (Task Force) has reviewed your City' s final Draft HHW Element . The review has been limited to issues of regional concern and consistency with the Countywide HHW Program. The following comments are proposed to enhance the document : Program Selection The HHW Recycling Hotline number (1-800-552-5218) as stated on page 15 of the document should be revised to indicate the new number (1-8B8-CLEAN LA) . Funding The County Solid Waste Management Fund (landfill tipping fee) has been instituted for the Countywide programs such as the Countywide HHW Program. The document should be revised to indicate that, should the City choose to conduct its own HHW Program, funding for the City' s Program will be provided by the City. Mr. Donald J. Wagner December 16, 1997 Page 2 California Environmental Quality Act (CECA) The appropriate CEQA documents must be circulated through the State Clearinghouse for agency review if this has not already been completed. Should you have any further questions, please contact Ms. Shari Afshari, at (626) 458-3572, Monday through Thursday, 7 : 00 a .m. to 5 : 30 p.m. Very truly yours, HARRY W. STONE, Chairman Los Angeles County Solid Waste Management Committee/ Integrateed Waste Management Task Force M. MICHAELL7 M0' JER Assistant Division Engineer Environmental Programs Division RNa:al\wagver cc : Ms . Judith Friedman, California Integrated Waste Management Board CITY OF ROSEMEAD RESOLUTION NO. 98-03 CLAIMS AND DEMAND LISTING PREPARED FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 10, 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $632,680.90 NUMBERED 22386 THROUGH 22501 INCLUSIVELY, WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, THE FINANCE DIRECTOR HAS CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE ATTACHED LISTING OF DEMANDS AND AS TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS, AND WHEREAS THE ATTACHED LISTED CLAIMS AND DEMANDS HAVE BEEN AUDITED AS REQUIRED BY LAW, THE SAME ARE HEREBY ALLOWED IN THE AMOUNT SET FORTH ABOVE. In accordance with Section 37202 of the Government Code, the Finance Director does hereby certify as to t.- : curacy of the above checks and as to the availability of funds for pay e,.,rhere.t, Lie0 'Liles^ �� I x. ..41 FINANCE DIRE• OR ASSIST• 'T CITY. AGER PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH I •F FEBRUARY 1998. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK COUNCIL AGENDA FEB 101998 ITEM No. 1�• 4. CITY OF ROSEMEAD CREDIT CARD RECAP BANKAMERICARD ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 4100-6450-01 League of California Cities Meeting $38.00 December 18, 1997 Attended by: Councilwoman Clark 4110-6450-01 City Business Meeting 34.41 December 11, 1997 Attended by: Donald Wagner, Steve Coopendhaver(GRC), Dale Brown (BVH Architects), Elisa Estrella (LA County Parks) RE: Proposition A funding for the Garvey Community Center 4110-6450-01 Purchase 20 one-way flight vouchers 860.00 Total $932.41 02/03/98 13 : 59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 1 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT A & R COUMMUNITY CHILD 38066 CONTRACT SERVICES/4TH QTR 02-4750-06320-P93802 2482 .50 CHECK NO. 22462 2482.50 AIR CONDITIONING CO. , INC 38068 BLDG MAINT/CITY HALL 01-4180-04725-FUNDO1 1014 . 00 CHECK NO. 22425 1014 . 00 AMY CHANG 38171 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22476 50.00 AWARDS BY CHAMPION 38067 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4820-05010-FUNDO1 412 .97 CHECK NO. 22426 412 . 97 BANK OF AMERICA NT&SA 38222 TRAVEL & MTG EXP 01-4110-06450-FUNDO1 894. 41 38222 TRAVEL & MTG EXP 01-4100-06450-FUNDO1 38. 00 PRE PAID 22386 932 .41 BILLARDS & BARSTOOLS 38216 POOL TABLE COVER/RCRC 01-4110-03973-FUNDO1 108 . 25 PRE PAID 22413 108 . 25 CAL JOINT POWERS 38069 MTG EXP 04/01-03/98/OGAWA 01-4130-06450-FUNDO1 610. 00 LA JOLLA CHECK NO. 22456 610. 00 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT. 38074 STREET SWEEP/DEC 97 22-4600-04850-FUND22 11950. 00 38075 STREET SWEEP/NOV 97 22-4600-04850-FUND22 11950. 00 CHECK NO. 22427 23900. 00 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS MS2 38072 MTG EXP/03-12-98/MONROVIA 01-4130-06450-FUND01 198 . 00 CHECK NO. 22429 198. 00 CCCA 38208 MTG EXP/TEMECULA 2/6-8/98 01-4110-06450-FUNDO1 95. 00 38208 MTG EXP/TEMECULA 2/6-8/98 01-4100-06450-FUNDO1 190. 00 PRE PAID 22410 285. 00 CHIN TRUONG 38175 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 100. 00 CHECK NO. 22477 100.00 02/03/98 13 : 59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 2 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT CHRISTOPHER YIP 38173 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50.00 CHECK NO. 22478 50.00 CITY OF ROSEMEAD 38215 NET PAYROLL/01-25-98 95-0095-01002 47081. 77 PRE PAID 22397 47081.77 COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 38070 EQUIP REPAIRS 01-4300-04740-FUNDO1 137. 79 CHECK NO. 22463 137.79 CONLIN BROS. 38073 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4840-05010-P51201 117. 34 CHECK NO. 22428 117.34 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC, INC. 38071 BLDG MAINT 01-4180-04725-FUNDO1 200. 00 CHECK NO. 22447 200. 00 DICK'S AUTO SERVICE 38076 VEHICLE REPAIRS/UNIT#20 01-4240-05225-UNIT20 497. 10 CHECK NO. 22430 497 . 10 DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION 38199 PAYROLL WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02125 42. 04 PRE PAID 22403 42 . 04 DON BOSCO TECH 38161 FACILITY USE REFUND 01-4830-03515-FUNDO1 480. 00 38161 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22479 530. 00 DON BURROUGHS 38078 REIMB/CHRISTMAS SUPPLIES 01-4200-06310-FUNDO1 201.83 CHECK NO. 22464 201.83 DONALD J. WAGNER 38077 REIMB/CCCA 01/13-15/98 01-4110-06450-FUNDO1 18. 08 CHECK NO. 22460 18.08 EDDIE KAISER 38082 SWEETHEARTS JAMBOREE BAND 01-4200-06310-P94301 225. 00 CHECK NO. 22440 225.00 EDNER LADS 38167 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 02/03/98 13 : 59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 3 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT EDNER LAUS CHECK NO. 22480 50.00 ELISA HERNANDEZ-PEREGRINO 38195 CLASS INSTRUCTION 01-4840-04455-P51501 484. 12 PRE PAID 22391 484. 12 38079 CLASS INSTRUCTION 01-4840-04455-P51501 375. 44 CHECK NO. 22466 375.44 ELIZABETH VALENZUELA 36080 CLASS INSTRUCTION 01-4840-04455-P51501 34 . 58 CHECK NO. 22465 34.58 EVANS TREE SERVICE 38081 TREE SERVICE 22-4640-04722-FUND22 12158 . 90 CHECK NO. 22431 12158. 90 F&A FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 38214 PAYROLL WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02120 5587 . 79 PRE PAID 22396 5587.79 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF 38084 FAIR HOUSING SVC/DEC 97 02-4750-07610-P96302 1295. 00 CHECK NO. 22467 1295. 00 FREDA GUNN 38083 DEF COMP/FEB 1998 81-0081-02200 300. 00 CHECK NO. 22435 300. 00 G & H AUTO PARTS 38087 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4810-05010-FUNDO1 5.92 CHECK NO. 22432 5.92 GARVEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 38088 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4810-05010-FUNDO1 42. 60 CHECK NO. 22433 42.80 GLADYS THOMAS 38085 SWEETHRT JAM/LINE-DANCE 01-4200-06310-P94301 100. 00 CHECK NO. 22474 100.00 GLORIA E. FIERRO 38198 PAYROLL WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02125 285.00 PRE PAID 22402 285.00 GUNDERSON CHEVROLET 38086 VEHICLE REPAIRS/UNIT #11 01-4240-05225-UNIT11 756. 37 02/03/98 13:59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 4 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT GUNDERSON CHEVROLET CHECK NO. 22434 756.37 HAROLD'S KEY SHOP 38089 KEYS 01-4810-05010-FUNDO1 8. 12 CHECK NO. 22436 8 . 12 HI-TOWERS OFFICE SUPPLY 38091 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4130-05010-FUNDO1 49. 63 38091 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4700-05010-FUNDO1 5. 38 CHECK NO. 22437 55. 01 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP. 38196 PAYROLL WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02121 2138. 00 PRE PAID 22401 2138. 00 INACOM COMPUTER CENTER 38101 COMPUTER EQUIP 01-4110-08220-FUNDO1 513 . 31 38106 COMPUTER EQUIP 01-4110-08220-FUNDO1 93 . 55 CHECK NO. 22438 606.86 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES 38095 RECREATIONAL TRANSIT 28-4660-04690-P97128 349. 50 38095 RECREATIONAL TRANSIT 01-4840-06464-P51601 1102 . 00 CHECK NO. 22439 1451.50 JAY-AR CONSTRUCTION 38223 DEFD LOAN/8939 BEATRICE 02-4750-07610-P95302 2000. 00 PRE PAID 22387 2000. 00 JEAN SHERWOOD-SCOTT 38099 MILEAGE REIMB/NOV 97 01-4820-05240-FUNDO1 41.40 38100 MILEAGE REIMB/DEC 97 01-4820-05240-FUNDO1 43 .80 CHECK NO. 22453 85. 20 JOE DURAN JR 38180 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50.00 CHECK NO. 22481 50. 00 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC. 38107 POOL REPAIRS 01-4830-04726-FUNDO1 1223 . 76 CHECK NO. 22441 1223.76 KOSMONT REALTY ,CORP. 38108 PUBLICATION/OAST OF DOING 01-4700-06460-FUNDO1 175. 00 BUSINESS SUPVLS" CHECK NO. 22468 175. 00 02/03/98 13: 59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 5 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 38200 PAGING SERVCIE 01-4180-04730-FUNDO1 17.22 PRE PAID 22404 17.22 LA COUNTY METRO TRANSPORT 38094 BUS PASSES/DEC 97 28-4660-07510-P96928 14085. 00 CHECK NO. 22443 14085. 00 LA COUNTY REGISTRAR/REC 38206 RESID REHAB/MADRID 02-4750-07610-P95302 21.00 PRE PAID 22408 21.00 38219 RESID REHAB/JOHNSON 02-4750-07610-P95302 21. 00 PRE PAID 22414 21. 00 LA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT 38113 CONTRACT SERVICES/DEC 97 01-4300-04512-FUNDO1 191937 . 65 36113 CONTRACT SERVICES/DEC 97 01-4300-04615-FUNDO1 12917. 33 38113 CONTRACT SERVICES/DEC 97 01-4300-04516-FUNDO1 18398.74 38113 CONTRACT SERVICES/DEC 97 01-4300-04514-FUNDO1 97011. 17 38115 SPEC EVNTS/SEPT-OCT/LLEBG 01-4300-04512-P41501 19318. 53 38116 COPS PHASE I/DEC 1997 01-4300-04512-P96001 6207 . 64 38116 COPS PHASE I/DEC 1997 02-4750-07610-P96002 9311. 47 38121 PRISONER MAINT/SEPT 97 01-4300-04520-FUNDO1 5786. 36 CHECK NO. 22444 : 60888.89 LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC. 38109 SHOPPER SHUTTLE/DEC 97 28-4660-07510-P96728 13158.96 38111 DIAL A RIDE/DEC 97 28-4660-07510-P96828 26952. 23 CHECK NO. 22442 40111. 19 LEAH TUTT 38184 FACILITY USE REFUND 01-4840-06464-P51601 38 . 00 CHECK NO. 22482 38. 00 LET'S DECORATE 38190 SWEETHEART JAMOREE 01-4200-06310-P94301 198. 00 PRE PAID 22389 198.00 LETICIA GONZALEZ 38177 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 100. 00 CHECK NO. 22483 100.00 LINCOLN TRAINING CENTER 38202 ADV/AFFAIR OF THE HEART 01-4200-06310-FUNDO1 195. 00 PRE PAID 22393 195. 00 02/03/98 13 : 59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 6 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL 38164 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22484 50.00 LOS ANGELES TIMES 38207 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 01-4110-06460-FUNDO1 43. 20 PRE PAID 22409 43 .20 LUCY CHAVEZ 38178 FACILITY USE REFUND 01-4840-04455-P51501 142 . 00 CHECK NO. 22485 142 . 00 MANNY ARROYO 38183 FACILITY USE REFUND 01-4840-04455-P51501 24 . 00 CHECK NO. 22486 24.00 MARIA CARRILLO 38160 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22487 50. 00 MARIA P. PENA 38168 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 100. 00 CHECK NO. 22488 100. 00 MARY SUE CASTELLO 38166 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22489 50. 00 MICHELLE MARIN 38159 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 38159 FACILITY USE REFUND 01-4820-03514-P51001 40. 00 CHECK NO. 22490 90. 00 MICHIE 38090 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4110-05010-FUNDO1 625. 06 CHECK NO. 22469 625. 06 MORRISON'S HOSPITALITY 38092 SR LUNCH PROGRAM 02-4750-07610-P95202 1212. 60 38093 SR LUNCH PROGRAM 02-4750-07610-P95202 1262 . 30 CHECK NO. 22470 2474.90 NEW CENTURY FORD 38097 VEHICLE REPAIRS/UNIT #31 28-4660-05230-UNIT31 713 .59 CHECK NO. 22471 713.59 02/03/98 13 :59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 7 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT NORMED 38096 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4820-05010-FUNDO1 116.96 CHECK NO. 22446 116.96 PAUL SHER OR ANDREW LIU 38170 FACILITY USE REFUND 01-4820-03514-P51001 540. 00 38170 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 100. 00 CHECK NO. 22491 640.00 POSTMASTER ROSEMEAD 38098 POSTAGE/SPORTS MAILER 01-4840-05012-P51401 96. 00 CHECK NO. 22448 96. 00 PRESENTACION RIVERA 38179 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 100. 00 CHECK NO. 22492 100.00 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 38103 MATS 01-4180-04725-FUNDO1 19. 81 CHECK NO. 22449 19. 81 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' PEFIPBENF SYS 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4120-04120-FUNDO1 259. 59 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4810-04120-FUNDO1 1390. 18 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4100-04120-FUNDO1 109. 11 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4800-04120-FUNDO1 777 . 40 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4740-04120-P95501 270. 20 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4700-04120-FUNDO1 679.77 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 02-4750-04120-P95102 160. 69 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4820-04120-FUNDO1 596. 96 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4110-04120-FUNDO1 1623 . 96 38187 RETIREMNT ANUITY/01-11-98 01-4130-04120-FUNDO1 662 .42 PRE PAID 22388 6530.28 REVOLVING ACCOUNT 38209 REPLENISH ACCOUNT 01-4700-03814-FUNDO1 25. 00 38209 REPLENISH ACCOUNT 01-4100-06450-FUNDO1 113 .25 38209 REPLENISH ACCOUNT 01-4700-06460-FUNDO1 120.00 38209 REPLENISH ACCOUNT 01-4110-06450-FUNDO1 60. 97 38209 REPLENISH ACCOUNT 01-4820-06450-FUNDO1 30. 00 38209 REPLENISH ACCOUNT 01-4110-05010-FUNDO1 40. 74 38209 REPLENISH ACCOUNT 01-4840-05010-P51501 -0. 50 PRE PAID 22394 389.46 RICHARD OGURA 38172 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22493 50.00 02/03/98 13 :59 PAGE: 8 CITY OF ROSEMEAD dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT ROBERT CONTRERAS 38163 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22494 50.00 ROCIO CARDONA 38169 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22495 50.00 ROSEMEAD TRUCK TIRE CO. 38110 TIRE REPAIR/UNIT #11 01-4240-05215-UNIT11 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22451 50.00 ROWLEY INTERNATIONAL INC 38112 RENOVATION/RSMD POOL 01-4830-06115-FUNDO1 520. 00 CHECK NO. 22472 520. 00 RSMD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 38104 MEETING EXP/01-08-98 01-4510-06450-FUNDOI 5. 00 38104 MEETING EXP/01-08-98 01-4100-06450-FUNDO1 20. 00 38104 MEETING EXP/01-08-98 01-4110-06450-FUNDO1 10. 00 38105 CONTRACT CHARGES/FEB 98 01-4200-06320-P93201 3750.00 CHECK NO. 22450 3785. 00 RUFINA ANDRADE 38181 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22496 50.00 S & M LANDSCAPE 38114 OLNEY ST TREES/PMT 1 01-4500-04915-P99701 11835. 00 CHECK NO. 22473 11835. 00 S.G.V. WATER ASSOCIATION 38193 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 01-4110-06460-FUNDO1 100. 00 M. ULARK- PRE PAID 22390 100.00 SACHS ELECTRIC 38123 ELECTRICAL SERVICES 01-4830-04725-FUNDO1 285. 00 38126 ELECTRICAL SERVICES 01-4810-04725-FUNDO1 96. 00 38128 ELECTIRCAL SERVICES 01-4810-04725-P92801 218. 00 CHECK NO. 22452 599.00 SANWA BANK 38189 F.I.T. WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02110 7326. 53 38191 SOC SEC WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02112 8628 .64 38192 MEDICARE WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02113 2017 . 90 PRE PAID 22399 17973. 07 02/03/98 13 : 59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 9 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC. 38124 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 2326. 09 38125 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 107.92 38127 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 42. 51 38129 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 1262. 91 38131 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 1298.71 38133 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04810-FUND22 661. 61 38134 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 748 . 82 38135 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 718. 65 38136 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 1874. 12 38137 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 47. 19 38138 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 699 . 39 38139 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 171. 16 38140 SIGNAL MAINT 22-4630-04815-FUND22 196. 14 CHECK NO. 22455 10155.22 SMART AND FINAL IRIS 38117 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4840-05010-P51501 163 . 80 CHECK NO. 22454 163 . 80 SO CAL GAS CO 38201 UTILITY SERVICE 01-4810-06115-FUNDO1 992 . 62 38201 UTILITY SERVICE 01-4180-06115-FUNDO1 341.41 PRE PAID 22405 1334. 03 SO. CALIF COUNCIL CAMERA 38174 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 100. 00 CHECK NO. 22497 100. 00 SO. CALIF. EDISON CO 38205 UTILITY SERVICE 61-4340-06120-FUND61 19990. 09 38205 UTILITY SERVICE 01-4830-06120-FUNDO1 4731.52 38205 UTILITY SERVICE 22-4630-06120-FUND22 103 .86 PRE PAID 22407 24825.47 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER 38203 UTILITY SERVICE 01-4810-06125-FUNDO1 635. 73 38203 UTILITY SERVICE 22-4640-06125-P92522 215.57 38203 UTILITY SERVICE 22-4640-06125-P92422 239 .30 PRE PAID 22406 1090. 60 STANDARD INSURANCE CO. 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4820-04117-FUNDO1 95.73 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4810-04117-FUNDO1 199.90 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4800-04117-FUNDO1 121.76 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4740-04117-P95501 39. 68 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4110-04117-FUNDO1 250.21 02/03/98 13 :59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 10 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT STANDARD INSURANCE CO. 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4100-04117-FUND01 34. 85 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 02-4750-04117-P95102 -70. 92 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4700-04117-FUNDO1 101. 20 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4130-04117-FUNDO1 103 . 75 38210 L-T DISABILITY/FEB 98 01-4120-04117-FUNDO1 40. 63 PRE PAID 22411 916.79 STATE COMPENSATION 38221 WORKERS COMP/JAN 1998 82-0082-02135 3591. 98 38221 WORKERS COMP/JAN 1998 01-4110-04115-FUNDO1 0. 87 PRE PAID 22416 3592.85 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 38217 SIT WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02111 1560. 23 PRE PAID 22398 1560.23 STRAC 38197 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL/B0RIS 01-4820-06450-FUNDO1 15. 00 PRE PAID 22392 15.00 SUSAN J. MARTINEZ 38118 CLASS INSTRUCTION 01-4840-04455-P51501 523 . 64 38119 CLASS INSTRUCTION 01-4840-04455-P51501 518 .70 38120 REIMB/PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 01-4840-05010-P51501 68 . 85 CHECK NO. 22445 1111. 19 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP 38130 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 01-4130-06460-FUNDO1 267. 00 CHECK NO. 22457 267. 00 TINA CHAN 38182 FACILITY USE REFUND 01-4840-04455-P51501 18 . 00 CHECK NO. 22498 18. 00 TOM TANG 38176 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 50. 00 CHECK NO. 22499 50.00 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, INC 38142 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04850-FUND22 769 .98 38143 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04850-FUND22 870.75 38144 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-FUND22 1192. 05 38145 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-FUND22 684. 11 38146 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-FUND22 519. 75 38147 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04860-FUND22 426. 26 38149 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04850-FUND22 837 . 00 02/03/98 13: 59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 11 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT r TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, INC 38151 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-FUNL3U 586. 58 38152 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-FUNO22 959.85 38154 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-FUND22 11069. 20 36155 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-FUND22 1243 . 35 38156 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-FUNDf 1103 .62 38157 TRAFFIC SIGNS 22-4650-04856-F184022 '3558. 90 CHECK NO. 224911 10821.40 TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS jjj 38211 OFFICIATORS 01-4840-04450-P51401i 140. 00 38213 OFFICIATORS 01-4840-04450-P514011 200. 00 PRE PAID 2239V 340. 00 UNITED WAY 38194 PAYROLL WITHLDG/01-25-98 82-0082-02125 21. 00 PRE PAID 224a; 21.00 VICTORY OUTREACH pp 38162 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0061-02300 ! 50. 00 CHECK NO. 225081 50.00 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 38132 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4110-05010-FUNDOI } 153 .56 38148 DEPT SUPPLIES 01-4110-05010-FUNDDI +i 36. 72 CHECK NO. 22459 : 190.28 VILLAGE TIRE SERVICE 38220 TIRE REPAIR/UNIT #29 01-4310-05215-UNIT29 1 131. 64 PRE PAID 22415j 131. 64 VISION SERVICE PLAN {f`` 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4800-04113-FUNDOI f 63 .30 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4810-04113-FUND01 7� 168 . 80 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4820-04113-FUNDO1 tj 63. 30 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 02-4750-04113-P95102 21. 10 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4120-04113-FUNDO1 ! 21. 10 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4100-04113-FUNDO1 105.50 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4130-04113-FUNDO.1 84.40 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4110-04113-FUND01 105.50 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4700-04113-FUND01 tlq@ 63 . 30 38212 VISION PREMIUMS/FEB 98 01-4740-04113-P95501 1 42. 20 PRE PAID 22412.q} 738.50 WALLIN, KRESS, REISMAN a 38150 RETAINER/FEB 98 01-4150-04120-FUNDO1 i -643. 61 38150 RETAINER/FEB 98 01-4150-04110-FUND01 -705. 00 1 02/03/98 13 :59 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PAGE: 12 dp704u1 WARRANT REGISTER # 98-03 2/10/98 USER: kal PAYEE INVOICE CHECK VOU. DESCRIPTON ACCOUNT CHARGED AMOUNT AMOUNT WALLIN, KRESS, REISMAN 38150 RETAINER/FEB 98 01-4150-04310-FUNDO1 4466. 67 CHECK NO. 22461 3118. 06 YOLANDA ESTRADA 38153 CLASS INSTRUCTION 01-4840-04455-P51501 513 .76 CHECK NO. 22475 513.76 YOLANDA GUZMAN 38165 FACILITY USE REFUND 81-0081-02300 100. 00 CHECK NO. 22501 100.00 GRAND TOTAL 632, 680. 90 02/03/98 13 :59 PAGE: 13 dp704u1 WARRANT SUMMARY BY FUND 2/10/96 USER: kal RECAP BY FUND PRE-PAID WRITTEN GENERAL FUND 01 18, 016. 15 384, 073 . 51 CDBG 02 2, 152. 67 15, 563 .87 STATE GAS TAX 22 558.73 57, 035.52 PROPOSITION A 28 55, 259.28 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 61 19,990. 09 TRUST & AGENCY 81 1,750.00 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 82 31, 199. 11 TREASURY FUND - CITY 95 47, 081. 77 TOTAL 118,998.72 513 , 682. 18 GRAND TOTAL 632, 680.90 applications will be accepted for HHW programs which include HHW collection, load checking or educational program. Contact: Fernando Berton California Waste Management Board HHW Program 1020 9th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95814 EXHIBIT A-2 ALTERNATIVE CLEANERS Surface Cleaners Mix 1 qt. warm water, 1 tsp. mild liquid dishwashing soap, 1 tsp. borax TSP, and a squeeze of lemon or splash of vinegar. Coffee Pot Cleaners Clean coffee pot surfaces with a mixture of warm water and baking soda or vinegar. Clean the interior of coffee pots with white vinegar according to manufacturer's direction. Kitchen Degreasers Use a non-chlorinated scouring powder with a nylon scouring pad or fine steel wool. Detergents Always use mild, biodegradable detergents. Look for naturally derived or glycerine-based soaps. For washing dishes by hand, use 1/2 baking soda with a mild liquid dishwashing _ liquid to help cut grease and food. APPENDIX 8 (THE APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 8) Educational objectives The HHW Element must present a program to significantly reduce or recycle the HHW stream. An aggressive thorough public education and information campaign is essential to accomplish both forms of diversion. (See Appendix 3 for additional cost information). The Agencies' plan includes the following multimedia educational programs. The Agencies will prepare all public education material for City distribution. The Agencies will accept liability for materials collected. The program will involve developing two mobile collection units, one for the County (and other cities) use and one for Los Angeles City. Residents from any City will be allowed to drop off waste at any collection event. The City also will work with the Agencies to publicize events in the future. Educational and promotional strategies will be geared toward using feasible methods in developing a local HHW plan. The City hopes to continue its current relationship with the Agencies for the collection of HHW. However, the City recognizes a need for developing more localized programs for HHW collection and education. To meet availability requirements set forth by the state, the City will strive to address cultural and social barriers through multimedia FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAMS NAME PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS/ GRANT CONTACT DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS INITIAL APPROACH AMOUNT •ENVIRONMENTAL Project Grants: For the Request application Average grant EPA Grants P ROT ECT ION AGENCY allowable direct cast expen- form. Should discus range is $5000 Administration Office of Solid Waste ditures incident to program application and to $200,000 Division Municipal Solid peformance plus allocable requirements with for fiscal year (PM-216-F) Waste Program portion of allowable indirect appropriate EPA 1990 Washington, DC 401 M St. SW costs. Regional Office Region IX Washington, DC 2046(Support: Training, surveys before submittal of Jeff Scott 202/382/4662 public education studies and application. Hazardous demonstrations. No funds Notification within Waste Manage- for construction or 180 days. ment Division acquisition of land. Deadline vanes from (HW072) Region to Region. 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco CA 94105 415/744- 2091 STATE FUNDING PROGRAMS • DEPARTMENT OF Grants: By law, the $8 Grant application $6 million is Project Staff, CONSERVATION million of the$250 million available for Program Division of Recycling generated by the beverage municipal use. Development 1025 'P' Street redemption program must be Branch at 916- Room 405 provided as grants. S6 323-3508 Sacramento, CA million of the $5 million 95814 must go towards conservation corps in cities with popula- tion over $250,000. The remaining$2 million is granted to conservation cr&ra2ticns. NAME IPRCGRAM 'REQUIREMENTS/ GRANT CONTACT (DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS INITIAL APPROACH AMOUNT FREEPORT- Grants: Areas of environ- _Letter including $2,500 to Jay Handelman McMORAN INC. mental concern,community project $7,500 Director CORPORATE GIVING and civic affairs, Giving description, Public PROGRAM primarily in company financial statements Relations 1615 Poydras St operating areas and proof of tax- New Orleens, LA (Northern CA.) exemption. 70112 Support: Matching funds, 504/582-4000 building funds,capital Nodeadllne. • campaigns, and special projects. PUBLIC TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE INTERNATIONAL CITY (Technical Asistance: Support Letter requesting Varies, may Russell MANAGEMENT environmental initiatives, more information pay for travel Hawkins ASSOCIATION (ICMA) including solid waste. Mainly on program. area accom— Project Man- 777 North Capitol through per exchanges and modations up ager Environ- Stret, NE encouraging public/private to $400. mental Washington, D.C. partnerships. Will fund Programs • 202/962-3671 public/ private projects for up to S40,000.00 NATIONAL GOVERNERS Technical Assistance: Support letter requesting Varies, may Jim Solyst ASSOCIATION (NGA) for environmental Initiatives more information pay for travel Program Dlr - 444 North Capital St, including solid waste, on program. and tor Environ- NW mainly through peer accommodation ment, Health, Washington, D.C. exchanges. Very and Safety. 202/624-5300 - - competitive. NATIONAL SOFT DRINK Technical Assistance: support Letter requesting Varies basal E. Gifford ASSOCIATION for environmental initiatives information on on.progrem. Steck,Vice 1 101 16TH ST. NW including solid waste, mainly program. President wasnington, DC through peer exchanges. Solid Waste 20036-4877 Programs 202/463-6700 NAME PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS/ GRANT CONTACT DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS INITIAL APPROACH AMOUNT !ARCO FOUNDATION Grants: For programs that See Annual Report $2,500 to Eugene R. 515 South Flower St. take a reasoned view on. for application $15,000 Wilson Los Angeles, CA environmental issues. - guidelines. 90071 emphasis is on groups with a •• 213/486-3342 balanced approach to land-use Letter/Proposal and natural resource ques- limited to two pages. tions,environmental education programs, policy No Deadline. studies,and action programs _ Notification within Support: Seed money, 4 to 6 months. operating budgets, equipment, • land acquisition, matching funds, special projects. technical assistance. BOISE CASCADE Grants To civic and Letter/Proposal Total $2.8 Vickie M. CORPORATE GIVING environmental improvement, million in Wheeler PROGRAM conservation. - 1986 Contributions One Jefferson Sq. Manecer Boise, ID 83728 In-Kind Equipment, products,sevic s, and land. 208/384-7673 Support: Capital campaigns, general purposes, operating budgets, special projects Giving primarily in areas of company operations CHEVRON Grants: Environment, 1-2 page letter, $20 to $7.2 J. W. Rhodes, CORPORATE GIVING conservation,civic involve- request application. million. Jr., Manager PROGRAM ment,community centers. Corporate 575 Market Street - Notification within Contributions San Francisco,CA Support: General purposes, 6 to 8 weeks 94120 program related investments, • 415/894-4193 and in-kind gifts. VII. The need for assistance is great. 22. How have you attempted to address the environmental problem and what have been the results? 23 . What are the major risks and hurdles to entering into this public-private partnership? XI. The funding for the project does not exceed $50,000. 24. Please state the size of the grant you are requesting. X Pan of the grant funding is allocated to document the results of the project and to develop a how-to guide. 25. Please indicate how you are going to document the results of the project and to develop a how-to guide. 3. Are you aware of another community where - this solution has been tried? Was the implementation successful? (Please provide a copy of the RFP. 4. Have you issued a Requesi for Proposal (RFP)? If so, please provide a copy of the RFP. 5. Has an economic feasibility study already been conducted? If so, what were the results? Please provide the name(s) of the firm)s) who conducted the study and provide a copy of the study. 6. What project-related documents have been developed to date? 7. Is your community currently out of compliance with EPA or the State Department of Natural Resources (or its equivalent)? Is your community facing a deadline for action? (Please describe) 8. Is this project part of a written environmental management plan? If so, what is the nature and scope of the plan? 9. What state and local laws and regulations (currently in place) would impact the proposed project? Would the impact be negative or positive? (Please describe in detail). III. The project address an important environmental problem related to one or more of the following areas: drinking water, solid waste, wastewater, hazardous waste, toxics, pesticides, air and radiation. Projects which address pollution prevention, corporate volunteerism, or multimedia approaches to solving environmental problems will be given preference. • 15. Which of the above environmental subject areas is the partnership addressing? APPENDIX 6 (GRANT SPECIFICATIONS) EPA ENVIRONMENT CRITERIA FOR P3 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS FISCAL YEAR 1991 I. The project tests and demonstrates and innovative or alternative financing approach to the provision of environmental services which can be used by small communities. II. The project demonstrates private involvement and/or private investment in the provision of environmental services. III. The project addresses an important environmental problem related • to one or more of the following media areas: drinking water solid waste, wastewater, hazardous waste, toxics, pesticides, air and radiation. Projects which address pollution prevention, corporate volunteerism, or multimedia approaches to solving environmental problems will be given preference. IV. The financial or public-private management approach used in the project can be replicated in many other communities. V. The project requires EPA funding to obtain legal, financial and ocher expertize needed to form the partnerships. Funding would not be used to construct or design a facility or to provide engineering and technical expertise. VI. The project start-up and completion is timely. VII. The community elected or appointed officials and private sector participants are enthusiastic about the project. VIII. The need for assistance is great. 3 The alternative will readily accommodate changing conditions. SHORT AND MEDIUM TERM IMPLEMENTABILITY • This considers if an alternative can be implemented in the short or medium term. Difficult to implement before 2000. 2 Can be implemented in the medium term. ' 3 Can be implemented in the short or medium terms. FACILITY REQUIREMENTS Facility requirements considers the need for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to support implementation of the alternative. 1 New facilities and/or infrastructure must be developed. 2 Existing facilities need expansion or alteration. 3 No new or expanded facilities needed. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL POLICY The alternative's consistency with existing local plans, policies, and ordinances based on local conditions. 1 Major local changes needed. 2 Minor changes needed. 3 No changes needed. INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS Are there any barriers (ie, long term franchise agreements, contracts, permit requirements, or other factors) which may impact implementation of the alternative. waste stream is generated by SQG's. In some areas, collection of SQG waste is performed simultaneously with HHW collection. In Alaska for example, 11% of the participants at collection facilities were SQG's, yet the SQG's accounted for 43% of the volume collected. Due to the high cost of non-household hazardous waste collection, SQG's have an incentive to utilize HHW collection programs, if available. SQG's have been willing to pay fees for disposal of their wastes at 1111W facilities. Maximizing public participation is the goal, policies must be developed which address the overall household hazardous waste issue in the community. OTHER ALTERNATIVES: The private sector can be encouraged to form and operate local HHW collection programs. A variety of education and action programs, promoted through retailers, schools, agencies, businesses and individuals, offer short- and long-term collection. Potential examples include: Store buy-back programs can be developed which encourage citizens to bring back unused hazardous products for a refund or discount on their next purchase. Used oil and auto batteries can be returned to retailers for recycling and re-use. Latex paint can be collected by paint retailers, and non-profit organizations for recycling and re-use. As part of the EPA pollution prevention program, an Environmental Stewardship concept has been developed. The concept implies that manufacturers take responsibility for their products throughout their life cycle. As an example, special packaging can be developed and included with a hazardous product to allow its safe return to the manufacturer for reuse or disposal. (6) The possibility of a health hazard for humans, animals, or plant life could be high. DOOR TO DOOR Toronto, Canada uses a HI-1W pick-up van, formerly known as the "toxic taxi", which services residents who cannot bring hazardous wastes to permanent collection sites. A hot line has been established which gives priority to elderly and handicapped households. The toxic taxi concept can be incorporated into a multi-jurisdictional plan with relative ease, provided cost sharing and liability agreements can be reached. This type of program is extremely expensive per unit of • dispose HHW. RECYCLING Recent legislation has been proposed by Assemblywoman Tanner. The bill exempts jurisdictions from fees and liability for initiating HI-IW programs which collect several materials, including auto batteries, latex paint, used oil and anti-freeze. These "limited collection" services can be operated in small areas usually 150 sq. ft. or less depending on which materials are collected. The costs involved in starting operations are minimal, and since all materials collected are recyclable, the disposal costs are low as well. With the liability and fees exemptions the Department of Health Services is allowing this type of program to operate under permit by rule standards which requires notification by letter only of the intent to collect these materials. If space and personnel are available the development of a recyclables collection program such as this would allow the City to move quickly to meet the state's requirements for a minimum cost. ** All personnel should be trained in emergency response equipment and the use of first aid and Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation MOBILE COLLECTION Mobile collection provides the greatest level of accessibility. Trailer mounted collection facilities have been developed which can be easily moved from site to site. Possible siting locations include Fire Department and Public Works yards, Fairgrounds, and shopping centers. A regular schedule of locations and times is developed and circulated in the community. It has been shown that the optimum range traveled to collection programs is no more than 5-10 miles. Mobile collection can be sited and scheduled to provide this access range to participants. The mobile collection alternative can be implemented in conjunction with a permanent collection facility A summation of mobile collection program implementation requirements follows: 1 ) Legal requirements are the same as a permanent facility. 2) Siting is more flexible since the collection facility is self contained and can be moved easily. 3 ) The facility can provide all the collection alternatives of a permanent facility including consolidation and re-use options. 4) The use can be controlled as in a permanent facility. 5) Education programs are the same as a permanent facility. 6) Similar staff training is required for mobile operations. However, additional labor will be required for constant set-up and take-down operations and transportation of the facility from site to site. 7) Contractors are readily available to initiate mobile HHW programs . 8) The mobile collection alternative is convenient and highly visible. EXHIBIT A-1 N a L UU A _ in CD m = a a) lighliat x = z; 8 Ty ats 114.-. Ill iphi. . N VJNot . U = O .. er CCI CI r54A O C 0 CC III CC CL R111111a _ = d _ e Hi cc w ar 1= p APPENDIX 4 (THE APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 4) The following discussion provides more information than was given in the body of the text regarding the various collection alternatives considered. COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES • The HHW programs must be accessible to all residents. The discussions of collection programs also addresses the treatment, • disposal and recycling of HHW's in the Los Angeles area. Several different collection alternatives were considered for local implementation and are discussed below. Some factors which required consideration include general liability, permitting requirements, ease of implementation, and overall cost. PERIODIC COLLECTION Single event collection programs which allow citizens to drop-off accumulated HHW are common. The Rose Bowl event conducted the Agencies attracted good citizen response. However, they are usually less effective in terms of number of households serviced when compared to the costs involved in conducting an event. A number of factors must be considered when planning periodic large scale collection: 1 ) Size of the area to be served 2) Environmental awareness 3 ) Publicity 4) Site location, to afford maximum accessibility Waste Category Gallons Pounds Number of Number of Management Container Drums (55 gal) Method B. Psticldes Such as herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, ere. — — PESTICIDE SUBTOTAL ..— .- . C. Corrosives 1. Acids a. Oxidizing — — b. Non- Oxidizing — 2 Alkaline — CORROSIVES SUBTOTAL — D. Oxidizers Excluding acids — . OXIDIZERS - SUBTOTAL — E. Miscellaneous 1. Cu Baia .. 2. Dry Cella — 3. Mercury — 4. Ocher .. MISC. SUBTOTAL -- . TOTAL WASTE . . COLLECTED _ — Name and .address. Type of Recycling Environmental Recovery, Inc. Recycling & Disposal of 0008 Mateo Plaza all Hazardous Material Los Angeles, CA Metal Recycling 213 -623 -9443 Tank Removal • 800-548- 1946 JCI Environmental Services Transportation & 3650 E. 26th Handling of Hazardous Vernon, CA 90023 and Non-hazardous 213 -268-3137 Chemicals and Waste Name and Address Type of Recvclino Alpine Paper Recycling Co. Cardboard, Computer Paper & Aluminum cans 818 -899-6624 • Asbury Oil Company Hazardous Waste 2100 N. Alameda Ave. Pumping, Spill cleanup, Compton, CA Tank Cleaning 213-321 -1392 Omega Recovery Services Solvents & Plastics 12504 E. Whittier Blvd. Whittier, CA 213-698 -0991 United Pumping Service Inc. Hazardous and Non- hazardous Waste Removal 818-961 -9326 Alcon Disposal Service Hazardous Waste Dis- posal and Transfer • 213-590-8531 800-252- 1212 Chem-Tech Systems Economical Treatment 2650 E. 26th Street of Hazardous Waste Los Angeles, CA 213-268-5056 Hazardous Waste Transport Hazardous and Non- 1009 El Centro St. Hazardous Waste South Pasadena, CA 800-545-8932 Recovery Management Recycling, Disposal Waste Preparation, Consulting Pumping Toxic & 818-991 -6943 Hazardous Waste There are some grants available which are discussed in the Appendices (6 and 7). These will be applied for, but the City has not included these grants in their funding plans. CONTINGENCY FUNDING SOURCES If the planned funding does not contribute enough money to pay for the HHW program, the City will use one of the following mechanisms: Implement an additional fee (or raise an existing fee) which will be added to the monthly waste disposal bill Charge a franchise fee to the haulers in order to operate in the City Business permit and site development fees The City plans to participate in the Countywide program for the forseeable future. Should the funding for that program (County Solid Waste Management Fund Landfill Tipping Fee) disappear, or should the City choose to conduct its own HHW Program, funding for that program will be provided by the City. This money would be used towards the management of a limited collection facility, most likely in connection with another jurisdiction or jurisdictions in a JPA arrangement. 46 The HHW coordinator will continuously be evaluating the informational program to see in which ways it can be improved. If the survey shows an awareness of above 70% the City will evaluate the amount of HHW that is being properly handled, and determine which is the best course of action to pursue. This will probably include additional promotion in general, and a flyer in the waste billing. If the City reaches its stated awareness level of 70% by 1995, and 85% by the 2000, the City will then evaluate the HHW flow and decide what actions if any to perform. The program will be successful if residents and businesses participate in the programs aggressively, and if the programs are accessible to all residents. An additional goal is to ensure continued participation in HHW programs once they have been developed. The HHW coordinator will be responsible for the public education monitoring, evaluation, and reporting. The costs and funding requirements are shown below in Table 8-3 Table 8-3 Public Education Staffing Costs. Revenues, and Funding Sources Planning Period Cost Revenue Revenue source Short term $2,000 $2,000 Solid Waste Fee/ City Funds Medium term S2.200 • $2.200 Solid Waste Fee/ City Funds The monitoring and reporting schedule is shown below in Table 84 Table 8-4 Monitoring and Reporting Tasks Planning period' Task I Fiscal Year Short term Review public response 1992 Short term Small scale awareness survey • 1993 Short term Report awareness and response findings 1993 Medium term Complete awareness survey 1995 Medium term Evaluate campaign achievement 1995 Medium term Make necessary adjustments 1995 44 multimedia educational programs. The HHW coordinator will be responsible for implementing, monitoring, evaluating, and reporting the informational program. The tasks which will be performed over the short and medium terms are shown in matrix form in Table 8-1. TABLE 8-1 PUBLIC EDUCATION IMPLEMENTATION TASKS Planning period) Task Fiscal Year Short term Develop list of who collects and/or recycles HHW in the area 1991 Short term Develop a slide library 1992 Short term Promote countywide program & HHW issues 1991 Short term Promote HHW Issues to be included in school curricula 1993 Short term Teach businesses how they can participate 1992 Short term Distribute Media Relations kit 1991 Short term Provide HHW information to community leaders 1992 Short term Develop a speakers bureau 1992 Medium term Sample survey residents to determine awareness level 1995 Medium term Evaluate achievement of campaign _ 1995 Medium term Continue campaign/make necessary adjustments 1995 • 42 If the diversion objectives are not attained by FY 1993, the following measures will be implemented: - Increase the level of education and public information an amount to be determined by the HHW coordinator - Modify the objectives of the City's HHWE to be feasibly attainable. 40 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION A. MONITORING The City will use the following method to monitor and evaluate the selected program's effectiveness: • Targeted waste characterization studies involving a representative sampling of generator sites or solid waste facilities to measure changes in the volume, weight, and hazard of household hazardous wastes Another method the City will use to chart progress of its HIV Plan is to evaluate the data obtained from the Agencies. This method is not specified in CCR 18751.6 (b) as one of the State suggested methods. However, the City believes the data which will be provided by the Agencies for the City's annual updates will be an excellent source of information. As stated previously, there is currently no data available that is very specific to HHW types and quantities being generated. The data obtained from the Agencies will be specific, and perfect for charting the success of the HHW Plan. In addition, the Agencies will be asked to develop a system to quantify the amount and type of HHW that were recycled or re-used and apply proportional credit to the City for this diversion of HHW. The HHW Coordinator, in conjunction with the Agencies and State, will develop specific reporting forms for data collection from HHW generators and collectors. These forms will be sent to generators and collectors (such as service stations which accept oil, or home improvement stores which accept anti-freeze, batteries, etc.), who (as a requirement on their business license) will be required to complete and return the form. As part of a yearly report the City will review the data provided and current City program achievements as compared to previously stated goals. To identify shortfalls in the education and public information 38 TABLE 6-1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ALTERNATIVE TERM TASK START DATE Countywide Short term Sign agreement with Agencies Approx. Jan. 1992 Collection Short term Participate in program Upon program implementation Medium term Continued participation and Upon program implementation public education Recycling Short term Find recycling site FY 1994 Program Medium term Determine feasibility of different materials in program FY 1995 (contingency) Medilum term Implement plan and supervise FY 1995 Public Short term Develop/implement public FY 1991 education campaign Education Medium term Continue campaign/evaluate its FY 1995 effectiveness Short term Design program FY 1991-1992 Monitoring Short term Lobby for better reporting of FY 1992 diversion and disposal Medium term Make any necessary adjustments FY 1995 36 will be implemented as evaluated in Chapter 4. Also, the City will keep the HHW issues current in the mind's of the residents by including information in the newsletter (See the City's SRRE) that is pertinent to HHW collection, source reduction, recycling, and disposal. The City will initiate discussions with other area cities regarding joint public education campaigns, joint implementation of programs, and joint efforts and activities to promote the recycling, reduction, and proper disposal of HHWs. These efforts will include jointly funded public education, the purchase of media relations items (videos, etc.) which will be available to the cities, and co-development of school curricula to teach the communities youth about HHW issues. B. CONTINGENCY PROGRAM If for some reason the Countywide program is determined to be doing an unacceptable job of properly recycling or disposing of the City's HHWs, then the contingency program will be implemented. The level of success will be determined by the monitoring and evaluation in FY 1993. As there are currently no estimates of the quantities of HHWs being diverted, it is impossible to know at what stage what amount of participation will be considered successful. This will be determined later by the HHW coordinator. RECYCLING If the Agencies' plan is not working out by 1994, the City will pursue establishing a (or promoting a private) recycling facility that will accept waste oils, auto batteries, paints, and possibly anti-freeze. This facility would probably be set up at a local gas station, or on a small area of City property. These recyclable materials are discussed in the evaluation of alternatives (Chapter 4). This has been chosen as a contingency program because it would be convenient, not too expensive, and would remove a significant percentage of the HHW stream. Also all of these materials are recyclable which would help avoid costly disposal. 34 A. SELECTED PROGRAM Based on the evaluation the City has selected to participate in the Dunt wide Oleo ion tern and im.lement a o.rdinated .ubli information program (This collection alternative was selected because of its' combination of positive factors including: cost effectiveness, implementability, no capital costs, convenience to the generator, ability to properly divert and dispose of a large percentage of the HHW stream.) The DPW and San Districts (the Agencies) will have primary responsibility for implementing the collection of the City's HHW. These alternatives were selected because they are the most cost effective way for the City to attain the stated goals. The expense of the alternatives makes the Countywide program clearly the logical option. The magnitude of the Countywide program will enable handling of more materials than if the City were to undertake its own collection program. The City will sign an agreement with the Agencies to the effect that the Agencies will provide the program, and the City will cooperate with them and also help promote the program. The City will designate a member of its staff to coordinate the promotion and collection program with the Agencies. The HHW Coordinator will probably also be the Recycling Coordinator as described in the City's SRRE, or he/she could be a hired contract consultant. It is possible that a number of area communities will jointly hire a coordinator to perform the tasks for all cooperating cities. The coordinator duties will be to: Obtain permits, if necessary Resolve liability questions Negotiate for siting of stopovers and collection events Arrange contracts and agreements with the Agencies and/or venders (supplies, disposal, hauling) Oversee on-site staffing if needed Arrange training for on-site staff if needed Oversee hotline and clerical support 32 5 SELECTION OF HHV PROGRAM Each alternative was examined in terms of selection criteria contained in Appendix 5. In the selection process all criteria were considered to have the same weighting factor. Table 5-1 presents the results of the selection process based on the criteria. Numeric values were assigned to each alternative for each criteria. A 3 is considered a high or good ranking for a specific criteria; a 2 is medium or average; while a value of 1 is a low or poor ranking. For example, if a program is estimated to have a relatively- low cost to the City (and its residents) it will be given a rating of 3. If an alternative is not flexible enough to accommodate changes in the HHW wastestream, then it would receive a I. By using this method, the alternatives that have the highest point total are best suited to the City based on the mandated criteria. The numerical ranking was not necessarily strictly adhered to as far as the selection of programs went, because it was felt that certain issues were more important than others. If a program is prohibitively expensive, it cannot be implemented by the City, regardless of how effective it is. After the alternatives were ranked, they were reviewed by the City to determine which are most feasible for successful and cost effective implementation. AB 2707 regulations require that the alternatives be evaluated on the basis of specific criteria. When selecting the programs, the mandated criteria were considered as well as the program's effectiveness in reducing targeted materials. Some factors considered most significant include general liability, permitting requirements, ease of implementation, and overall cost. 30 If other alternatives come to light over the short and medium terms they will be evaluated in future plan updates. B. EVALUATION CRITERIA All alternatives considered were evaluated against a number of criteria to determine which alternative the City would implement. Prior to completing a full evaluation of all options, the alternatives were objectively screened to determine if they were feasible and could be realistically considered for implementation. Of the alternatives discussed in this chapter, a permanent facility, load checking at the source, and local efforts to encourage at-source collection did not pass the initial screening process. A permanent facility in the City would be far too expensive, face institutional barriers, and is inconsistent with local policies. Load checking at the source is too expensive and faces serious implementation difficulties due to the training required of all garbage collectors and the packing and disposal of any HHWs found. Local efforts to encourage the formation of an at-source program will not be further evaluated due to the high cost of individualized collection, and the health risk of curbside collection. The remaining alternatives passed the preliminary analysis and were fully evaluated according the criteria in the regulations. In the final selection of alternatives, some other factors were considered, including: liability, permitting requirements, ease of implementation, and overall cost. The criteria are explained in detail in the Appendix (5, "Criteria"), or in the regulations. Table 4-1 is a summarization of the evaluation performed by the City, and contains the pertinent information applicable to the criteria. 28 associations, about the availability of speakers to address HHW. HHW activities would be incorporated whenever other solid waste issues are being brought before the public. EXHIBIT 4 COMMUNI'T'Y CONTACT CHECKLIST GOVERNMENT/COMMUNITY LEADERS City Administrators City Mayor City Council Members City planning and solid waste staff Extension and Health Department representatives Key business owners/managers Directors/administrators of key public facilities (i.e. hospital, library, etc) Representatives from State agencies EDUCATIONAL LEADERS Key college administrators Superintendents of Boards of Education Primary and secondary school principals Science teachers RECREATIONAL/ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS School and college recreation/outdoor clubs Conservation clubs Environmental/recycling organizations or coalitions League of Women Voters Boy Scouts Girl Scouts FRATERNAL/CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS Rotary Jaycees Kiwanis Club Knights of Columbus 26 S. PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAMS The EPA gives source reduction as top priority in preventing pollution from HHW. If substitute products other than HHWs can be utilized, and/or quantities of HHWs reduced, then disposal will also be reduced. Source reduction efforts include a public education campaign that targets change in consumer purchases, as well as use and disposal habits. A variety of educational programs on recycling and reuse have been used in California. The following activities make up the City's public education alternative to promote widespread knowledge of HHW issues. If implemented the programs chosen will be continuously reviewed and upgraded to achieve maximum effectiveness. Educational efforts for waste reduction programs will be carefully planned and integrated with other public information activities already being undertaken in California. Whenever possible, the City will cooperate with non-profit organizations, Los Angeles County officials, and business establishments to select and distribute informational material. The City could also provide meeting places for the public exchange of HHW information. (FY 1992) The City would develop a list of information on who collects and recycles HHW in the region; this would be distributed to the residents through their waste bill. A library of HHW publications would also be developed for public use, and the City will continue to promote the HHW hot line number. (FY 1993) The City would develop a slide library as the HHW program is implemented. In addition to slides illustrating the need for recycling and reduction of HHW, City-specific slides on HHW issues would be developed. (Many hazardous waste facility and collection service vendors are willing to provide slides of their programs). The City would make available other 24 Solvents A solvent drop-off center could be part of a program at a permanent collection facility or a commercial location such as a gas station. Residents can bring their solvents to a facility where it is collected, stored, and eventually picked up by a solvent recycler. Typically, householders do not generate large amounts of bulk solvents. Batteries • A. used automobile battery recycling program is typically combined with a permanent HHW collection program or with a mobile collection program. Residents would bring the batteries to the drop- off facility for recycling or disposal. An estimated 80 percent of the auto batteries that are traded-in when purchasing a new one are recycled; the remaining 20 percent are sold to smelters for recovery. A major part of a used battery program is to increase the rate of recycling through vendors through the education of both purchasers and vendors. Paints Paint would be collected for recycling at hazardous waste collection facilities or major paint stores. Facility attendants would inspect the paint to determine whether it is recyclable, or if it must be disposed as hazardous waste. Paint recycling options depend on the condition of the paint, and whether the paint is water-based or solvent-based. It is possible to establish an exchange program for usable paints; this could entail distribution of quality paint to organizations such as theater groups or community service groups. Another recycling option is to mix paints of similar bases and add grey pigment for use in municipal applications such as graffiti cover-up. 22 SOURCE CHECKING • Waste can be pre-screened by garbage collectors before being taken to the landfill. The City can have the collectors trained by the County Sanitation Districts to check the refuse for hazardous materials before placing it into collection trucks. If a hazardous substance is found, it is labeled with a warning sign, securely packaged, and left with the generator for proper disposal. This type of program will identify toxics in the solid waste stream regardless of source (i.e., households, small businesses, or industries), but only detects HHW discarded in the trash. This type of load checking is not too effective, can be expensive due to the necessary training, and is hazardous to the refuse collectors. CHECKING AT THE LANDFILL In 1985, the San Districts began operating a Waste Acceptance Control Program (WACP) at the Puente Hills Landfill. The WACP targets loads brought in by commercial establishments as they usually dispose of larger amounts of hazardous waste. Trucks containing residential waste are also randomly checked for HHW. The landfill has trained technicians daily from 8am to 6pm to check wastesfor hazardous materials. Once a hazardous substance is found, the hauler is issued a citation, and the technician ensures that the substance is properly handled, stored, and disposed. The materials found are kept in a designated area, and are eventually manifested and transported to a DHS approved facility near Bakersfield. Presently most of the area landfills and transfer stations have load checking programs in operation. 6. RECYCLING A recycling program for HHW targets materials that can readily be recycled and subsequently reduce the high costs of disposal at a permitted hazardous waste facility. Many communities have integrated recycling programs into their existing collection events 20 FEE-FOR-SERVICE Fee-for-service systems are those where the jurisdiction contracts out the HHW collection at a charge to the generator. The collection methods vary, depending on what the City dictates in the contract. These programs are not typically implemented as most residents prefer a disposal service where there is no direct charge to them. DOOR-TO-DOOR • The door-to-door alternative is known as the toxic taxi service, which collects HHW from residents who call in and set appointments. This is convenient and highly visible. The toxic taxi can be shared with other jurisdictions with relative ease, provided cost sharing and liability agreements can be reached. This service is usually only for the elderly and the disabled as it is very expensive to operate. CURBSIDE In curbside programs residents place their HHWs out at the curb in marked containers. The waste is removed by a specialty vehicle staffed by a trained operator. The waste is taken to an approved facility where it is packed for n-ansportation to a recycling or disposal facility. Many curbside programs are operated through a contract with a private collector. Often the collector also has a contract with the City for regular household solid waste collection. Curbside collection has several major drawbacks: Curbside collection is labor intensive, and program costs vary widely, depending on the types of wastes collected. Careful planning is required for curbside placement of incompatible wastes. Preventing small children from playing with the hazardous materials placed at curbside is an important issue in curbside collection. 18 4 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES • (There is supplemental information to this chapter in Appendix 4) This section evaluates the program alternatives for HHW management. These include collection programs, load checking, recycling programs, and public education. Several different collection alternatives were considered for local implementation and are discussed below. The narrative below is a brief presentation of each alternative and some of the factors which were most significant with respect to whether or not the program was selected. A. COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES, 1. PERIODIC COLLECTION Single event collection programs often involve a temporary collection facility set up for a one or two days at a local site (parking lot, City Hall, etc.). The public is made aware of the event through an informational campaign, where they are encouraged to bring their HHWs to the location. The drop-off point is staffed by trained personnel which collects the HHW and packs them in drums or lab- packs for transportation. The HHW is taken to a facility for recycling, treatment (to reduce the toxicity), or disposal. These events are currently being held in the region and are well received. 2. PERMANENT FACILITIES Permanent collection sites are generally equipped with safety and fire equipment, as well as containers for the proper storage of the HHWs collected. The facility is usually a fairly large-sized building that has plenty of storage space which allows for incompatible materials to be properly separated. These facilities are staffed by a trained full or part time person. This person must be able to identify various HHW types, correctly pack and store the HHWs for storage and transportation, and maintain the necessary paperwork to 16 particular day. These events are called "round-ups" and are well received by the public. They also promote public awareness regarding separate disposal of HHW. The round-ups are not jurisdiction specific; for example, during the year, more than one event will held at the Rose Bowl which accepts HHW from many jurisdictions. There have been no round-ups to day that have only allowed HHW generated within the City to be disposed. Round-up events require a large number of people for a short period of time. The County has utilized the services of a licensed contractor to provide technical personnel to unload, sort, categorize, lab-pack, transport and dispose of the material. Approval to conduct a round- up is obtained from the Regional Office of the State Department of Health Services. Round-up events are publicized through the use of public service announcements, door hangers, flyers and newspaper articles. As stated previously, there are no existing records which allow the City of Rosemead to determine how much of their HHW is being diverted. The source jurisdiction of the HHW recycled is not known. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND INFORMATION The DPW and San Districts have already undertaken the following public information efforts to promote the existing HHW round-up program: Distribute pamphlets and flyers during round-ups and upon request A HHW/Recycling hotline (1-888-CLEAN LA) has been established to answer questions regarding the proper use and disposal methods for household hazardous products. Recycling and disposal locations have also been provided to interested individuals. The collection events have been promoted through flyers, newspaper ads, and radio announcements. 14 EXHIBIT 2 SOLID WASTE STUDY SUMMARY Current Waste Generation (1990 TPY) Waste Source Disposed Diverted Generated' Residential Single-family 20,618 173 20,791 7 • Multifamily 2.184 Q 2,184 (10 or more units) 22,802 17 22.975 Subtotal Commercial Business 20,501 1,325 21,826 Co3,523 0 3,523 Construction Debris' 967 Institutional 967 2 Subtotal 24.991 11 325 26.316 Industrial 7,047 0 7,047 TOTAL 54,840 1,498 56,338 (3%) 'Generated = Disposed + Diverted 'Includes Department of Public Works, parks, and street cleaning. 12 Increase public awareness of and maximize public motivation to participate in the HHW program through an aggressive public education and information campaign to begin in 1992. The public education campaign will: a) promote source reduction by advocating and using products which are not harmful to the environment, b) promote quantity planning to consumers regarding the purchase of HHWs, c) advise residents of collection in cooperation with the Countywide HHW management program, and d) highly publicize the collection dates and methods to be used by residents, as well as HEW recycling and disposal locations by the end of 1991. Medium Term Goals and Objectives Medium Term Goal (by 2000) To expand the short term program to achieve greater participation rates in the City's selected HHW program, and to raise the awareness level to 85% of the population. Corresponding Objectives Continue cooperation with the DPW and San Districts on the operation of the Countywide HHW management program over the full course of the medium term. Expand educational efforts (by 1996) implemented in the short term to increase the reduction of HHW generation by increasing the HHW consciousness of the public. • Expand public information program into non-traditional methods including churches, etc. 10 This document also includes the following technical appendices: 1 Recycling Centers 2 Reporting Forms 3 Public Education Schedule and Costs 4 Appendix to Ch 4 5 Criteria Definitions 6 EPA Grant Specifications 7 Private Funding 8 Appendix to Ch 8 9 Appendix to Ch 9 8 EXHIBIT 1 COMMON HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Bathroom Garage Medications & Drugs Motor Oil & Antifreeze Fingernail Polish & Removers Car Batteries - Aerosol Cans (hair sprays, etc.) Auto Polishes Deodorizers Solvents & Degreasers Disinfectants Engine Cleaners Kitchen Storage Shed Drain & Oven Cleaners Pesticides & Fertilizers Home Cleaning Products Pool Chemicals (chlorine, Furniture & Floor Polishes etc.) Weed Killers Basement Paints & Thinners Wood Preservatives Pet Care Products (e.g. flea shampoo, etc.) Hobby Supplies (e.g. glues, etc.) Photographic Chemicals 6 LIST OF TABLES Title Pate Table 4-1. Summary of Evaluation for Each Alternative by Criterion 2 9 Table 5-1. Numerical Rating for Alternatives 31 Table 6-1. Implementation Schedule 3 6 Table 6-2. Staff Costs for Program Implementation 3 7 Table 7-1. Monitoring Costs and Revenues 3 9 Table 8-1. Public Education Implementation Tasks 42 Table 8-2. Public Education Schedule and Costs 43 Table 8-3. Public Education Staffing Costs and Revenues 44 Table 8-4. Monitoring and Reporting Tasks 44 Table 9-1. Total Cost to the City 45 4 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION 38 38 Monitoring 3 8 Evaluation 8 EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION 41 43 Monitoring and Evaluation 45 9 FUNDING 46 Contingency Funding Sources Appendix 1. Recycling Centers Appendix 2. Reporting Forms Appendix 3. Public Education Schedule and Costs Appendix 4. Appendix to Ch 4 Appendix 5. Criteria Definitions Appendix 6. EPA Environment Grant Specifications Appendix 7. Private Funding Appendix 8. Appendix to Ch 8 Appendix 9. Appendix to Ch 9 2 COSTS/FUNDING The total cost to the City in the first year of implementation is estimated to be $11 ,450. This would cover all staff time associated • with the implementation and monitoring of the HHW program, and all public education materials. This will be funded through the City's general fund and/or solid waste management fees. • SUMMARY The HHWE evaluated many alternatives available to manage the HHWs generated within the City: The best program for the City is to participate in the Countywide program. This will best dispose of a variety of HHWs in a manner which is cost effective to the City. The funding mechanism ($.56 per ton) will be imposed regardless of any cities' participation in the program. (Cities choosing not to participate will receive a partial rebate of the surcharge). The City will participate in the Countywide program, and will augment the public education efforts of the DPW and San Districts with an informational campaign of their own.