REHAB – Approval of Minutes 8-26-97 NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL
AFFROITED _S '1' ,;CSEIlMEAD
REHABILITATION 11111911ALS BOARD
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ROSEMEAD BUILDING REHABILITATION
APPEALS BOARD
AUGUST 26, 1997
The regular meeting of the Rosemead Building Rehabilitation Appeals Board was called to order
by Chairman Imperial at 7:15 p.m. in the Conference Room of City Hall, 8838 E. Valley
Boulevard,Rosemead, California.
The Pledge to the Flag and Invocation were waived as having been completed during the
meeting just adjourned.
ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS:
Present: Boardmembers Taylor, Vasquez, Vice-Chairman Bruesch, and Chairman
Imperial
Absent: Clark
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JULY 22, 1997 -REGULAR MEETING
MOTION BY BOARDMEMBER TAYLOR, SECOND BY BOARDMEMBER
VASQUEZ that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997, be approved as submitted.
Vote resulted:
Aye: Vasquez, Imperial, Taylor
No: None
Absent: Clark
Abstain: Bruesch
The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
I. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH
The Board Secretary administered the oath to all persons wishing to address the Board.
H. HEARINGS
The following item was taken out of order in deference to those in the audience
B. 4552 SULTANA AVENUE
The subject property consists of an owner-occupied single family residence located in the
R-1 zone. A "Please Letter" and a "bulky item" trash notice were mailed to the property owner on
April 2, 1997. Inspection on May 5, 1997 revealed further deterioration of the property. The
Building Official declared the property substandard and filed a Declaration of substandard
Property with the Los Angeles County Recorder's office. A "Fifteen Day" certified letter was
mailed and posted on the property on May 8, 1997, requesting abatement of the substandard
conditions. On May 13, 1997, a letter was received from the property owner, Ms. Alcantara. She
stated she was unable to correct the defects at the property and requested additional information
regarding a public hearing. On May 20, 1997, Ms. Alcantara did request a hearing. Building
Department staff responded to Ms. Alcantara's letter and offered to meet at the property. On
May 29, 1997, Steve Bailey, Supervising Building Inspector, met with Ms. Alcantara at the site.
He explained the list of defects and the property rehabilitation program. She indicated she had no
financial resources to make the repairs. Mr. Bailey referred her to the City's CDBG program. On
June 3, 1997, Ms. Alcantara came to City Hall and spoke to both Building Department and
CDBG staff. She completed an application for an emergency grant, as she currently has no
REHBAB 8-26-97
Page #1
running water. Unfortunately,Ms. Alcantara does not qualify under CDBG guidelines due to
liens against the property as a result of unpaid trash bills. Inspection on July 23, 1997 revealed no
change.
In addition to the Building Department violations, both Fire Department and Health
Departments also have cases on the property.
A Notice of Hearing was mailed and posted on the property on August 5, 1997. All
interested parties have been notified
The City Building Official recommends that the Board find the property substandard and
order all substandard conditions removed and/or corrected by October 1, 1997.
James Guerra, Building Official, presented the staff report.
Faustina Rios, 9089 Evansport Drive, Rosemead, neighbor of the aforementioned
property, stated that she and the other neighbors have tried to assist the owner by doing yard
work, but the homeowner has not been cooperative. Ms. Rios continued that the property is a
fire hazard, one palm tree is diseased and the other one will soon be and she and the neighbor that
owns the connecting garage fear for their well being.
Vice-Chairman Bruesch stated that he has received numerous complaints about the
property from neighbors and the uncooperativeness of the owner.
Chairman Imperial clarified that the owner is not a senior citizen and what recourse does
the Board have to have the property cleaned up.
Mr. Guerra responded that overgrown vegetation removal date can be changed to
September 10, 1997 and if the building is open, it can be barricaded.
Boardmember Taylor agreed with the 10-day weed abatement process but asked about
the City's liability concerning changing the time frame for repairs to the house.
Robert Kress, City Attorney, stated there is a process in place and though, historically,
cooperation is not anticipated from the homeowner, the time frame still needs to be provided. If
there is no compliance, then the case can be prosecuted.
Debbie Shawbaum, 9075 Evansport, Rosemead, stated that she lives directly in front of
the property owner and for the past five years, she and her neighbors have constantly called City
Hall and the Sheriffs Department with complaints. Ms. Shawbaum explained that the property
owner is paranoid/schizophrenic and it is difficult to access the property as the owner consistenly
refuses help and that currently her water is not turned on.
Chairman Imperial requested a memo from staff explaining why this complaint was never
received by the Board until now.
MOTION BY BOARDMEMBER TAYLOR, SECOND BY BOARDMEMBER
VASQUEZ that the Board direct staff to obtain the 10-day Weed Abatement Court Order, find
the property substandard and order all substandard conditions removed and/or corrected by
October 1, 1997. Vote resulted:
Aye: Bruesch, Vasquez, Imperial, Taylor
No: None
Absent: Clark
Abstain: None
The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
REHBAB 8-26-97
Page*2
Discussion continued on what type of assistance can be offered to the property owner.
Vice-Chairman Bruesch requested staff to obtain a log of the calls made to the Sheriffs
Department regarding that property and to contact the Health Department or appropriate agency
to help her with her numerous problems.
Chairman Imperial requested that an update be placed on the Status Report on
September's meeting.
Boardmember Taylor requested a copy of the CDBG guidelines that places a lien on the
property for non-payment of her trash bill.
A. 4520-28 MUSCATEL AVENUE
The subject property consists of four, tenant-occupied units located in the C-1 zone. A
"Please Letter" was mailed to the property owners on September 11, 1996, and a "bulky item'
trash notice was sent to the owners and tenants on September 11, 1996. Inspection on October
15, 1996 revealed no progress. The Building Official declared the property substandard and filed
a Declaration of Substandard Property with the Los Angeles County Recorder's office. A "Thirty
Day" certified letter was mailed and posted on the property on October 24, 1996, requesting
abatement of the substandard conditions. A requested inspection was made on October 30, 1996.
Interior access was gained to two units, 4520 and 4522 Muscatel Avenue. Further deficiencies
were noted, and a revised list of defects was sent to the property owners on November 11, 1996.
Progress inspection on December 3, 1996 revealed no progress other than minor yard area
cleanup. A letter from Li Li, the property manager, was received on December 10, 1996. She
acknowledged the violations and requested additional time due to financial difficulties, but stated
that all work would be complete by the end of April, 1997. On January 8, 1997 another trash
notice was sent to the owners and tenants. Follow up inspections in January, February and March
1997 again showed no progress. On March 25, 1997, third trash notices were sent. Inspections
were made on April 8, and April 23, 1997, but no changes were evident. Contact was made with
Li Li on May 15, 1997 and arrangements were made to meet at the property on May 21, 1997.
She failed to keep the appointment. An updated list of defects was mailed that date. Inspection
on June 23, 1997 showed no progress, however, the tenants at 4522 Muscatel Avenue stated that
they had received an eviction notice. Another inspection was made on July 9, 1997, but the
inspector could not determine from the exterior is the unit was indeed vacant. Several phone
messages were left for Li Li, however she did not return the inspector's calls.
A Notice of Hearing was mailed and posted on the property on August 5, 1997. All
interested parties have been notified.
The City Building Official recommends that the Board find the property substandard and
order all substandard conditions removed and/or corrected by October 1, 1997. However, if
permits and approvals are obtained, and sufficient progress is achieved by October 1, 1997, the
abatement date may be extended to November 3, 1997.
Mr. Guerra reported that there has been considerable progress on this property and should
be completed within the week. Staff contacted the property owners today and they agreed to the
recommendation and stated they would not be present at tonight's meeting.
MOTION BY BOARDMEMBER TAYLOR, SECOND BY BOARDMEMBER
VASQUEZ that the Board find the property substandard and order all substandard conditions
removed and/or corrected by October 1, 1997. However, if permits and approvals are obtained,
and sufficient progress is achieved by October 1, 1997, the abatement date may be extended to
November 3, 1997. Vote resulted:
REHBAB 8-26-97
Page#3
Aye: Bruesch, Vasquez, Imperial, Taylor
No: None
Absent: Clark
Abstain: None
The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
C. 9406 VALLEY BOULEVARD-REHEARING
The subject property consists of a vacant dry cleaning business located in the M-1-D zone.
This property was previously before the Board on November 28, 1995. At that time, the Board
ordered a completion date of January 2, 1996 with a possible extension to February 1, 1996.
Compliance was never achieved. The case was referred to the City Prosecuting Attorney and was
eventually taken to Court. The property was sold in February 1997, and charges against the
former owner were dismissed on March 7, 1997
A "Thirty Day" certified letter was mailed to the new owner and posted on the property
on April 16, 1997. Follow up inspections were made in May, June and July 1997. The site
remains secure, however neither progress nor demolition has occurred.
A Notice of Hearing was mailed and posted on the property on August 5, 1997. All
interested parties have been notified.
The City Building Official recommends that the Board find the property substandard and
order all substandard condition removed by October 1, 1997.
Vice-Chairman Bruesch asked what the new owners plan to do with the property.
Peter Lyons, Planning Director, responded that he has met with the new owners and they
are unaware of what is required to develop that property.
Vice-Chairman Bruesch stated that that property will need to have a major soil
remediation done due to the type of business that was there.
MOTION BY BOARDMEMBER TAYLOR, SECOND BY BOARDMEMBER
VASQUEZ that the Board find the property substandard and order all substandard conditions
removed by October 1, 1997. Vote resulted:
Aye: Bruesch, Vasquez, Imperial, Taylor
No: None
Absent: Clark
Abstain: None
The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
III. STATUS REPORTS
A. SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS AND PROPERTIES
No action required on this item
B. BUILDING REHABILITATION APPEALS BOARD
No action required on this item.
C. CITY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY REFERRAL UPDATE
No action required on this item.
REHBAB 8-26-97
Page t!4
IV. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS -None
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further action to be taken at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 7:47
p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for September 23, 1997, at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted: APPROVED:
Board Secretary CHAIRMAN
REHBAB 8-26-97
Page#5