CC – Item 3B – Res. 97-44 – Findings and Determinations to Redevelopment Agency Payment for the Kelburn Ave. and Delta Ave Storm Drain Improvements RESOLUTION NO. 97-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY PAYMENT FOR THE KELBURN AVENUE AND DELTA
AVENUE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the storm drain improvement project will take place at locations within and
adjacent to the boundaries of Project Area No. 1 as depicted in Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the storm drain improvement project to be constructed in areas within and
adjacent to Project Area No. 1 will improve the area aesthetically and structurally; and
WHEREAS, the total Agency obligation for the project shall not exceed Four Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($450,000).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rosemead City Council resolves as follows:
Section 1. The Rosemead City Council finds, determines, and declares:
(a) The payment by the Rosemead Redevelopment Agency for the storm drain
improvement project on Kelburn Avenue and Delta Avenue within and adjacent to Project
Area No. 1, as depicted in Exhibit "A", is of benefit to the Project Area. This finding is
based on the fact that the storm drain improvements made at the various locations
indicated on Exhibit"A" will serve to improve the aesthetic appearance and infrastructure
within and adjacent to Project Area No. 1.
(b) That there are no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities,
structures or other improvements available to the community. Although the City has a
General Fund surplus, the uncertainty of continuing municipal revenue sources militates
against the depletion of the existing reserves until such time as revenue sources and
major required expenditures are stabilized.
(c) The payment by the Rosemead Redevelopment Agency for the specified storm
drain improvements will eliminate blighting conditions within the project area by
correcting existing drainage deficiencies on roadways within and adjacent to the project
area, thus enhancing the value of abutting properties.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of October, 1997.
MAYOR
ATTEST: COUNCIL AGENDA
OCT 141997
CITY CLERK ITEM No. a - 6.
1_:= i, I:
til .Loral zt LL _ •w5 inti 4X3..-
= 1.3 ^TI - :{.----.1,,, ,,,,-, ' '„:, u
a si t�
J ,, 1:kiss `\o
nr..E
\ 1 R Y i-
,-� yi .. p; ST
n F l+�
u
I ;y I� _�� 1L' E [� 2 5 §7 l m
q .1 .5.,rI �1 3 .!,i I1 ,-d n
.I�C. FRWY - v :- -I `s 7 - ai
EWVN �� r 1� 1 3-
���I� 6
I.:,,1_L .
a�,\IN lis V ff1QI1TE,
r.
1 ! 'I . I
I = .31 t\ = c j5554R(31 - 1 PCL
sl s q €5
y,rO ENI 1 ' - "i $1
SV - � rSOf
a'II 1 �i
JIe frh
d :.,:z I r l 3 n e� 5 'i � / i'Val =i�
�' claw
) .. \ ST 8 c ? aysl ..
�S5 �
7rjfLE.L -H.
\' { S7( i {{
L f ! 9rs 1
�411-7,_:;:_ / P - • a
/ III �t�J Jlf�— • ._ �1
� 'J� I POMONA ,� -__-,11___
^
r
/ Y / h'» nr, thY—rJ-� 1'
' ri� :
M
-.eee stat
/ 1
yef - ep o r t
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANK TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1997
SUBJECT: RECEIPT AND AWARD OF BIDS FOR THE ROSEMEAD
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM,
DEFERRED LOAN-7959 NEWMARK AVENUE
On September 2, 1997, Staff gave permission to receive bids for a Deferred Loan at 7959
Newmark Avenue. Bid packages were given to the homeowner along with a list of
contractors who had applied to be on the City list. These bid packages requested line item
bids for the work to be completed on the project, and a total for the entire rehabilitation
package.
Work to be completed includes code violations such as replacement of roof, bring existing
water heater to code, remove deteriorated carport and reconstruct. Other work to be
completed on property includes bathroom repair, electrical upgrade, smoke detector
installation, repair to windows and interior painting.
Each bidding contractor met individually with the homeowner during the on-site walk-
through of the property prior to submitting a bid. Each contractor explained his procedures
and techniques to the homeowner during that process. Staff requested potential bidders
to do this in order to ease any concerns the homeowner may have about the project.
The bid due-date was October 2, 1997. Bids were turned in to staff and staff proceeded
to check the responsiveness of each bid.
COUNCIL AGENDA
OCT 2 81997
ITEM No. cc_4
1
Bids were received from two Contractors and two contractors declined to bid. According
to the Council approved guidelines, the homeowner is required to obtain a minimum of
three bids. Four contractors were contacted, however, R&R Construction and Nick Acedo
Builders declined to bid due to nature of work. A spread sheet was set up containing the
two bids. The spread sheet was reviewed by staff and the homeowner and then given to
the homeowner for further review.
In accordance with the City's approved Rehabilitation Guidelines, the owner has the ability
to select its contractor of choice as long as the bid is within 15% of the average bid or in-
house estimate. The homeowner selected Jay-Ar Construction. The contractor selected,
Jay-Ar Construction, submitted a bid in the amount of$27,084.00. In addition to this bid,
a contingency amount for unforeseen items and circumstances has been added. These
unforeseen items are additional items that may not be brought to light during the course
of construction.
The Bid results are as follows:
Jay-Ar Construction $27,084.00
Terrones Construction $31,100.00
Average Bid $29,092.00
RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept and award contract to Jay-Ar Construction, owner selected bidder for this loan
program in an amount not to exceed $31,000.00
2. Authorize staff to initiate contract with owners and contractor.
Attachments
➢ i'o ➢ T
y Iti1
, 0II 1
I CDIC
of
o mIo
I A
O
CIO
N _N
O
O co
lo o
101 OI
d
- I
co IO $
O '90
ww
0 0 i
m'
w Iw m
N to J O W Iea
O° m l=
0 016: 11Im mo v
N 10 O 101
101 co ". O 10
o o co 10
m
3
1 'o
101
I 0 J
to ca co
co
U OO. 0
O
OO HN
O O 'I
N dI
NmI o
O F
0 0o m
z
of 0 6.
I . 3
COo
to
m " W 0 m j
Nn o of
J IO O
CO O O
O 0 O
C
J 0o
O Q
O 015
1O
� I
1 JI
coa -0'1
O'' 011N
O O 7
'101 O ''
m
d
N It -.
J Ito
O OI
0 0 31
0 la
to m
m
CI
in,3
io o'o
I 10 I0 o
IN W'OO
IC) - a
1101 _
'u,' o0
io 0
oo
E
,,,,
4M
�. '
stat
feport
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANK TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGg&
DATE: OCTOBER 21, 1997
SUBJECT: RECEIPT AND AWARD OF BIDS FOR THE ROSEMEAD
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM,
DEFERRED LOAN-8541 DRAYER LANE
On September 25, 1997, Staff gave permission to receive bids for a Deferred Loan at 8541
Drayer Lane. Bid packages were given to the homeowner along with a list of contractors
who had applied to be on the City list. These bid packages requested line item bids for the
work to be completed on the project, and a total for the entire rehabilitation package.
Work to be completed includes code violations such as replacement of roof, bring existing
water heater to code, correct unpermitted patio cover and bring to code. Other work to be
completed on property includes bathroom repair, repair to windows and kitchen, installation
of fence along rear of property and weatherstripping.
Each bidding contractor met individually with the homeowner during the on-site walk-
through of the property prior to submitting a bid. Each contractor explained his procedures
and techniques to the homeowner during that process. Staff requested potential bidders
to do this in order to ease any concerns the homeowner may have about the project.
The bid due-date was October 15, 1997. Bids were turned in to staff and staff proceeded
to check the responsiveness of each bid.
COUNCIL AGENDA
OCT 2 81997
ITEM No. V.. Ge-2
I
\ -
Bids were received from nine Contractors. A spread sheet was set up containing the nine
bids. The spread sheet was reviewed by staff and the homeowner and then given to the
homeowner for further review.
In accordance with the City's approved Rehabilitation Guidelines, the owner has the ability
to select its contractor of choice as long as the bid is within 15% of the average bid or in-
house estimate. The homeowner selected AMPB Construction. The contractor selected,
AMPB Construction, submitted a bid in the amount of$22,088.00. In addition to this bid,
a contingency amount for unforeseen items and circumstances has been added. These
unforeseen items are additional items that may not be brought to light during the course
of construction.
The Bid results are as follows:
AMPB Construction $22,088.00
Terrones Construction $30,900.00
D Restoration $20,850.00
MAR Construction $22,010.00
Nick's Remodeling $19,470.00
U.P.C. $27,000.00
All County Restoration $24,106.00
Quality Restoration $18,210.00
Sonrise Construction $32,579.90
Average Bid $24,134.88
RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept and award contract to AMPB Construction, owner selected bidder for this loan
program in an amount not to exceed $25,000.00
2. Authorize staff to initiate contract with owners and contractor.
Attachments
0 r a c z n1 IvI3I ,Nl lo, _"-! £ zl 1 Iol h
2 n A I'A O O nI AI A
u' I� 2 A 0 'Q I I NI D.
A q
n12 R l0 A 3 r - O All 8 2 12 A
- _ [i a
M I (TI i
ffikl A ts ffi.
181 8 :8 8 8 1181 8 8 811 1
I —I�
% Iffi1 ffi ffi,
I!s' 0 g''
Hi
1 1 8 X81 181 8 18 8.
8 18 8
Im : NJ N' CO Si « N
a la Is Is1 s' g, 2 s !F s s s Is I° 8 '8 s'"
181 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 81 8 18 S! _iss H
27
s t V s„
s
01 0 s 's'
1 1 - 1 A
l
N�
Y a s S; 1 1 81
Is 8 s o
'- 60
gs
L.-; '8 811
o�l
1 o s 18 s 's 18 8�
1l d
o a
1
ffiffi I 3
ss frl
8 8 8 88 s
8 Wl
In
s Is CO 8 88
1 r 11 l 8 18 8 8 '. .813
N r. ffi
I81l?.
I 1
8 ''0 8 8 81 82:
i III 1 n
I
CO
CO
8 18
1 1 _ 8 1 8 81 .8 8. 8
1
I 0
I .. IIstm
NIi 11 N
^8
m
8 '8CO 1 ',8 NI �00 2
! I. I 8 8' I8 8, 8I 8 81 81. IJ
i �.
IIs11 CO 1163,.; ,g 113
1 8 8 8 181 '81 18
Lo o y
ro co dl
8111 118 I
8 8
1 1 00 00 8 18 00 8