The URL can be used to link to this page

PC - Item 3A - Design Review 18-01 - 3731 Charlotte AvenueTO: FROM: DATE: ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING DIVISION JUNE 4, 2018 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW 18-01 3731 CHARLOTTE AVENUE SUMMARY Wei Zhi Li has submitted a Design Review application to construct a new two-story single family dwelling unit with 3,245 square feet of floor area at 3731 Charlotte Avenue (APN: 5371-003-034). Any new dwelling unit to be constructed that equals or exceeds two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of developed living area shall be subject to a Discretionary Site Plan and Design Review. The project site is located in a Single-Family Residential (R-1) zone. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Section 15303(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines exempts projects consisting of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. Accordingly, Design Review 18- 01 is classified as a Class 3 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of Califomia Environmental Quality Act guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ·It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 18-08 with findings (Exhibit "A"), and APPROVE Design Review 18-01, subject to the 22 conditionsoutlined in Attachment "A" attached hereto. PROPERTY HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION The project site is located on the west side of Charlotte Avenue, between Marshall Street and Valley Boulevard. According to the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office, the project site consists of one (1) parcel, totaling approximately 11,115 square feet of lot area. In1924, a 772· square-foot single-family dwelling unit was built on the subject site. Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 2 of 15 Front Elevation (Existing) Site and Surrounding Land Uses The project site is designated in the General Plan as Low Density Residential and on the Zoning Map as R-1 zone. The site is surrounded by the following land uses and zones: North General Plan Designation: Zoning: Land Use: South General Plan Designation: Zoning: Land Use: East General Plan Designation: Zoning: Land Use: West General Plan Designation: Zoning: Land Use: DISCUSSION Project Description Low Density Residential R-1 Residential Low Density Residential R-1Residential Low Density Residential R-1 Residential Low Density Residential R-1 Residential As illustrated in Exhibit "B", the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 772 square foot single-family dwelling unit to construct a new 3,245 square feet single-family dwelling Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 3 of 15 unit: 1,828 square feet and 1,417 square feet of floor area on the first and second floor, respectively. The proposed project includes a new attached three-car garage. Development Standards Staff has verified that the proposed single-family dwelling unit would be in compliance with the applicable development standards of the Rosemead Zoning Code, as demonstrated in the following table: Development Feature Required Proposed Front Yard Setback 20'-0" 20'-0" North: 6'-0" 1st Floor Greater of 5'-0" or 10% of lot width: 6'-0" South: 12'-3" Side Yard Setback North: 6'-0" 2nd Floor 5'-0" minimum, 15'-0" combined South: 12'-3" Combined: 18'-3" Rear Yard Setback 25'-0" -79'-0" Floor Area Ratio 0.35:1 (maximum) 0.29:1 Parking Three spaces in enclosed garage Attached three-car garage Floor Plan The proposed first floor plan consists of a covered porch, covered patio, three-car garage, laundry area, office, living room, dining room, breakfast area, family room, kitchen, one (1)bedroom with a closet, bathroom, and powder room. The proposed second floor plan consists of four bedrooms with closets, three bathrooms, and two walk decks. ·Elevations The applicant has proposed to utilize an earth tone color scheme. The primary exterior wall color would be off-white, with accenting dark brown railings, trims, fascia, andgutter. To further add contrast to the building, the applicant has proposed to incorporate a tanriish-brown tone to the decorative cement precast foam trims, molding, and. . band. More specifically, the applicant is proposing the following color and materials: Color Manufacturer Exterior Walls Pure lvorv La Habra Stucco Exterior Base Stone Veneer Coronado Stone Trims Trabuco La Habra Stucco Fascia Boards Black Walnut Dunn Edwards Paints Roof Vallejo Ranqe Eaqle Roofinq Balcony Railin�s Tea Baq (N/A) Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 4 of 15 Parking and Circulation Fencing Landscaping Mechanical Elements MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 5 of 15 developed living area shall be subject to a Discretionary Site Plan and Design Review. Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(C), provides the criteria by which the Planning. Commission· may approve, approve with condition"s, or disapprove an application: A.The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposedbuilding and site developments that exist or have been approved for the generalneighborhood. The subject property is located within an established residential area of the City. The applicant has provided an aesthetically complementary design, which consistsof a modern two-story residential design, earth-tone colors, decorative hardscapematerials for-walkways and driveways, and new landscaping. The developmentwould improve the overall aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. B.The plan for the proposed structure and site development indicates the manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected agains·tnoise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the -environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storageand loading areas. The proposed structures are designed with front, side, and rear setbacks that meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the Single-Family Residential (R-1) zone, and creates a sufficient buffer between the proposed dwelling unit and thesurrounding properties to protect against noise, vibrations, and other factors, whichmay have an adverse effect on the environment and neighborhood. Thisdevelopment would not generate any foreseeable permanent negative impacts tothe noise levels of the surrounding area . .In addition, the mechanical equipmentare proposed to be located in areas screened froni public view. All construction work would be required to comply with the timeframe and decibel levels indicated in the City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance. Conditions of Approval will addressfactors such as construction hours, noise, and iandscaping. C.The_ proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design andappearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environmentto materially depreciate in appearance and value. The proposed project would not depreciate the appearance and value of the localenvironment. Staff has worked closely with the applicant to achieve a residentialdesign that would complement the neighborhood character. The applicant hasproposed a contemporary architectural design, which incorporates some aesthetic characteristics found in residences currently built in the San Gabriel Valley. The proposed dwelling unit has been designed to create visual interest at the streetlevel. The proposed design elements are similar to many homes in the surroundingarea. Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 6 of 15 D.The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed developments . on land in the general area, especially those instances where buildings are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center orin public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style. The subject property is not part of the Civic Center Plan, precise plan, or land reserved for public or educational use. The applicant has proposed an appealing architectural design, which will create an improved site that is aestheticallycomplementary to the surrounding area. E.The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this Code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. The proposed development satisfies all of the minimum zoning code requirements for the Single-Family Residential (R-1) zone, and all applicable referenced code sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code. F.The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has beengiven to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of public streets. Access to the project site would continue to be from Charlotte Avenue. The design and construction of this project would preserve and provide adequate access and circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The proposed dwelling unit and landscaping will significantly improve the visual effect of the site from the view of the public street. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process, which includes a 300-foot radius public hearing notice to sixty-three (63) propertt owners, publication in the Rosemead Reader on May 24, 2018, and postings of the notice at the six (6) public locations and on the subject site. Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 7 of 15 Prepared by: ��· Kinson Wong Assistant Planner EXHIBITS: A.Planning Commission Resolution 18-08 Reviewed by: Lil alenzuela City Planner B.Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations (Dated_ May 30, 2018)C.Assessor Parcel Map (APN: 5371-003-034) Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 8 of 15 EXHIBIT "A" PC RESOLUTION 18-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,· APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 18-01, PERMITTING A NEW 3,245 SQUARE FEET SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT WITH AN ATTACHED THREE-CAR GARAGE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED .· AT 3731 CHARLOTTE AVENUE (APN: 5371-003-034), IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE. WHEREAS, on April 10, 2018, Wei Zhi Li submitted a Design Review application requesting approval to construct .a new two-story single:.family dwelling unit with 3,245 square feet of floor area at 3731 Charlotte Avenue; WHEREAS, 3731 Charlotte Avenue is located in the Single-Family Residential (R- 1)zoning district; WHEREAS, Section 17.28.020(G) of the Rosemead Municipal Code provides the criteria for a Design Review; WHEREAS, Sections 65800 & 65900 of the California Government Code and Section 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning Commission to approve, conditionally approve, or deny Design Review applications; W�EREAS, on May 24, 2018, sixty-three (63) notices were sent to property owners within a 300-foot radius from the subject property, the notice was published in the Rosemead Reader, and notices were posted in six (6) public locations and 017 site, specifying the availability of the application, and the date, time, and location of the public hearing for Design Review 18-01; WHEREAS, on June 4, 2018, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Design Review 18-01; and WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning- Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony.Presented to them in order to make the following determination. NOW� THEREFORE, BE IT RES.CL VED by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Design Review 18-01 is classified as a Class 3 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines. Section 15303(a) of the California Environmental · Quality Act guidelines exempts projects consisting of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small, facilities or structures; Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 9 of 15 installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that facts do exist to justify approving Design Review 18-01, in accordance with Section 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows: A.The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general neighborhood. FINDING: The subject property is located within an established residential area of the City. The applicant has provided an aesthetically complementary design, which consists of a modern two-story residential design, earth-tone colors, decorative hardscape materials for walkways and driveways, and new landscaping: The development would improve the overall aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. B.The plan for the proposed structure and site development indicates the manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected against noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage and loading areas. FINDING: The proposed structures are designed with front, side, and rear setbacks that meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the Single-FamHy Residential (R-1) zone, and creates a sufficient buffer between the proposed dwelling ·unit and the surrounding properties to protect against noise, vibrations, and other factors, which may have an adverse effect on the environment and neighborhood. This development would not generate any foreseeable permanent negative impacts to the noise levels of the surrounding area. In addition, the mechanical equipment are proposed to be located in areas screened from public view. All construction work would be required to comply with the timeframe and decibel levels indicated in the City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance. Conditions of Approval will address factors such as construction hours, noise, and landscaping. C.The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value. FINDING: The proposed project would not depreciate the appearance and value of the local environment. Staff has worked closely with the applicanf to achieve a residential de�ign that would complement the neighborhood character. The applicant has proposed a contemporary architectural design, which incorporates some aesthetic characteristics found in residences currently built in the San Gabriel Valley. The proposed Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 10 of 15 dwelling unit has been designed to create visual interest at the street level. The proposed design elements are similar to many homes in the surrounding area. D.The proposed building or structure is in· harmony with the proposed developments on land in the·general area, especially those instances where buildings are within or adjacent to larid shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center or in public or educational.use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style. FINDING: The subject property is not part of the Civic Center Plan, precise plan, or land reserved for public or educational use. The applicant has proposed an appealing architectural design, which will create an improved site that is aesthetically complementary to the surrounding area. E.The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this Code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. FINDING: The proposed development satisfies all of the minimum zoning code requirements for the Single-Family Residential (R-1) zone, and all applicable referenced code sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code. F.The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of public.streets. FINDING: Access to the project site would continue to be from Charlotte Avenue. The design and construction of this project would preserve and provide adequate access and circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The proposed dwelling units and landscaping will significantly improve the visual effect of the site from the view of the public street. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission HEREBYAPPROVES Design Review 18- 01 for the construction of a new 3,245 square feet two-story single-family dwelling unit at 3731 Charlotte Avenue, and subject to the conditions listed in Attachment "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. This action shall become final and effective ten (1 O) days after this decision by the Planning Commission, unless within. such time a written appeal is filed with the City. Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.160.040 -Appeals of Decisions. SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on June 4, 2018, by the following vote: Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 11 of 15 AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: SECTION 6. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED th CERTIFICATION th AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 12 of 15 ATTACHMENT "A" (PC RESOLUTION 18-08) DESIGN REVIEW 18-01 3731 CHARLOTTE AVENUE (APN: 5371-003-034) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL June 4, 2018 Standard Conditions of Approvals 1.Design Review 18-01 ("Project") is approved for the construction of a new 3,245 square feet two-story single-family dwelling unit, in accordance with the plans marked Exhibit "B", dated May 30, 2018. Any revisions to the approved plans must be resubmitted for Planning Division review and, if satisfactory, approval. 2.The following conditions must be complied to the satisfaction of the PlanningDivision prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits, occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request. 3. The conditions listed on this exhibit shall be copied directly onto any development plans subsequently submitted to the Planning and Building Divisions. 4.Approval of Project shall not take effect for any purpose until the applicant(s) havefiled with the City of Rosemead ("City") a notarized affidavit stating that he/she is aware of and accepts all of the conditions of approval as set forth in the letter of approval and this list of conditions within ten (10) days from the Planning Commission approval date. 5.The on-site public hearing notice posting shall be removed by the end of the 1 O day appeal period of Project. 6.Project is approved for a period of one (1) year. The applicant(s) shall commence the approved project or request an extension within 30 calendar days prior to expiration. The one (1) year initial approval period shall be effective from the Planning Commission approval date. For the purpose of this petition, projectcommencement shall be defined as beginning the permitting process with thePlanning and Building Divisions, so long as the project is not abandoned. If Project has been unused, abandoned, or discontinued for a period of one (1) year, it shall become null and void. 7.The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make and/or approve minor modifications to the project and to these conditions of approval. Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 13 of 15 8.Project is granted or approved with the City and its Planning Commission and CityCouncil retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modifythe permit, including the conditions of approval based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of the use, a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the use, or the expansion,alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use. This reservation of right to review isin addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, andCity Council to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved under the Rosemead Municipal Code for any violations of the conditions imposed onProject. 9.The applicant(s) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rosemeador its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set side, void, or annul, an approval of the Planning Commission and/or City Council concerningthe project, which action is brought within the time period provided by law. 10.The applicant(s) shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws relative to the approved use, including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff, and Health Depa_rtments. 11.Building permits will not be issued in connection with any project until such time asall plan check fees and all other applicable fees are paid in full. Prior to issuanceof building permits, any required school fees shall be paid. The applicant shallprovide the City with written verification of compliance from the applicable schooldistricts. 12.The numbers of the address signs shall be at least six (6) inches tall with aminimum character width of 3/4 inch, contrasting in color and easily visible atdriver's level from the street. Materials, colors, location, and size of such ·addressnumbers shall be approved by the Community Development Director, or his/herdesignee, prior to installation. 13.The hours of construction shall be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday .. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any federalholiday, without prior approval by the City. The applicant shall abide by the noisecontrol sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code. 14.The Building Division, Planning Division, and Engineering Division shall . haveaccess to the project site at any time durin_g construction to monitor progress. 15.All requirements of the Building and Safety Division, Planning Division, andEngineering Division shall be complied with prior to the final approval of theproposed construction. 16.All grownd level mechanical/utility equipment (including meters, back flow prevention devices, fire valves, A/C condensers, furnaces, and other equipment) Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pa e 14 of 15 shall be located away from public view or adequately screened by landscaping or screening walls so as not to be seen from the public right-of-way.· 17.The project site shall be graded to drain to the street, but in no case shall suchdrainage be allowed to sheet flow across public sidewalk. A grading and/or drainage plan shall be prepared, _submitted to, and approved by the Building Official, and such grading and/or drainage shall take place in accordance with such approved plan. 18.Violations of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of revocation proceedings. Project Specific Conditions of Approval 19.All property that is vacant, under construction, or being demolished shall be totallyenclosed around the perimeter by a fence that is a minimum of six (6) feet in height as measured from adjacent property, subject to the approval of the CommunityDevelopment Director or other designated officials. The following requirements shall be satisfied: a.The required fence shall be adequately constructed from chain-link, lumber, masonry or other approved materials. The fence shall be entirely selfsupporting and shall not encroach or utilize structures or fencing on any adjacent property without prior written approval of the adjacent property owner. b.The fence shall be installed prior to the initiation of any construction or demolition and shall be continuously maintained in good condition. c.Signs stating "PRIVATE PROPERTY, NO TRESPASSING" shall be postedon the fence. 20.All gutters, downspouts, mechanical elements, and/or architectural features shall · be painted to match the single-family dwelling unit. 21.The applicant(s) shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation planshall comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and with theGuidelines for Implementation of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and ·include a sprinkler system with automatic timers and moisture sensors. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed and completed prior to final Planning Division approval. 22.All walls and/or fences shall match or complement the sir:igle-family dwelling unitin color, material, and design; and shall be consistent in appearance. Exhibit B 10'--0' COVERED PATIO 10·--0·x 18'-0" CONDENSING UNIT ON 4" CONCRETE PAD I I I I I I I I L 3" ABOVE GRADE r±=-1 17'-0" - -J---u.ITERT,!,JNMEITTNICR� - - - - �l�R�� ------7I ····=.=c= I 16'-0"X 15'-6' : I I �IL y ROOM @ I ) I ��---(I �1 1 1• 48'-3" 10'-9" •DLJ BEDROOM 1 10'-9" X 13'-6• I I t=Ll_=-===cf" 4'-0" I ,�----i L-1-----_ _J 6'-0" 92'-3' OPEN TO ABOVE \_/ 14'-6" OFFICE 14'-il" X 13'-6" ce 4.'-4." / FOYER I \ 3'-6' 5'-6' 3'--6" -------�----.1 /n, -------/111------J'·----�_: .... ----- 10'--0' 17'-0" 13'-6' 15'-9' 46'-3' 92'-3' *THE WIDTH OF RUN AT NARROW END IS AT LEAST 6".Fl RST FLOOR PLAN MAX. 7.5" RISE & MIN. 10" RUN AT AS 12" FROM NARROW END.(SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0") FRONT UNIT WINDOW 718" THK. EXTERIOR STUCCO 1212X8 S1UD (TYP.) (EXTERIOR SIDE) TRIM 1 1 (INTERIOR SIDE) PLAN VIEW 2X4 WDO. FRAMING 4" RECESSED WDO. 2 X 8 FRAME (N.T.S.) EXTERIOR�-fl!,..----. STUCCO TRIM 4" SILL HEADER 1e-----+--WIN DOW DRYWALL VERTICAL (SECTION 1-1) (N.T.S.) TOP OF ROOF TP 2ND FLR. F.F TP 6'-6" "' 7.75" MAX 34'-0" 30'-6" WALL MOUNTED TANKLESS WATER HEATER 30'-0" f----LINE CF 2ND Ft.R ABOVE 3-CAR GARAGE ( CLEAR 30' X 20'} 29'-6" LEGEND: 2 X 4 STUD WALL 2 X 8 STUD WALL m m □ □ □ � 1' 1' ,--�7 12" DROPPED CEILING I I L ___ _J 8" DROPPED CEILING W,1 I iJlll SOUTH ELEVATION ( SCALE : 1/8"= 1'-0" ) ( FRONT UNIT) 9 iiJID �□ l!;;Jl□ iiJID [_]=ii 11[_1 -11 11 1111 m 6 N ,,,- c;. q "' 6 " e □□iiJI□ e �L--=-i 1c::=J1 lc::=71 1c::=11 m NORTH ELEVATION ( SCALE : 1/8"= 1'-0" ) ( FRONT UNIT) 57' O" 22'-3' 23'-6" 11'-3" 10'-6" 12'-3' 10'-0" 18'-0" 5'--6" 6'--6" 4'-9" �-------------------�------------- -------------□ DD □(( .I I I I I I I I I I I �-"IX w �ATFOOW ; 5, X3- • « JACLJll ;;j C\'IW _ -/4 • \£,:b �. THI!' CJaflS ',• AllO • ?'J��t� ccmr 1, � MASTER BATH OJ 11'-9" X 11'-3" I\ -r7 ' LINE.N ' '' ' ---- -- --WJC 7'-0'X 11'-3' -- :� -V----"' LED T'I g I l+/ALKDECK2 18" HT. W.I. RAILING----,. ON 24" LOW WALL 42" HIGH--,. LDWWALL DECK DRAIN_/ WI IN-WALL DRAIN PIPE 10'--0' 16'-il" X 14'-6' I II I I I ,. I 42" HIGHJ I LOW WALL I I I V 4'-6" MASTER BEDROOM '� .)--� ,:\�?!j □ □ \/fr --· 14 9"X9 g• □21□□ -- 4'-9' 15'-9" 9'-3' 21'-3" • THE WIDTH OF RUN AT NARROW END IS AT LEAST 6". MAX. 7.5" RISE & MIN. 10" RUN AT AS 12" FROM NARROW END. --�::.-----. � '-... __ "' �! C BEDROOM 4 BATH2 � 17'-0" X 10'--0' -5'X1iY 0J "'"' ,Vi " 0 � CLOSET J 0 --a" � � _j � , "' -I \_J 9LL �D � � Nz BED OOM--2 'i' w m 11'-9 X 11'-6' <?b N -�----. . '.. ) t 4;� •. ,, □�1� ----�----5' 9" l °' ' 4'-0" WALK DECK 1 I ON.I" (62SF) I "' MAX ,:_ " I -DECKDMIN #\'ii DOWNSPOUT � "' � 7� �-� BATH LINEN � 0J 5'-0"Xltm C � (( . 5'-6" 57'-6" � \ ' �' './ J ---------EB-� 15'-9' SECOND FLOOR PLAN ( SCALE : 1/8"= 1'-0" ) FRONT UNIT © 6'--6" 0 L.:::_ ~42 'HIGH � W RAILING � � u: '? D ro z'i' w b "'�-T 1'-6' 3'-3' 11'-3" LEGEND 2 X 4 STUD WALL 2 X 8 STUD WALL �(FOR EASTERN 4" RECES.SED WINDOW) 24'-9" 1' ' ------------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------ 24'-9" 1' 40% OF THE SECOND FLOOR FRONT FACING WALL SETBACK CALCULATION WALL LENGTH OF SECOND FLOOR FRONT FACING WALL 21' ELEVATION SPECIFICATIONS I<\ CONG. ROOF TILE (EAGLE ROOFING PRODUCTS, TYPE. CAPISTRANO, 'v NAME.· VALLEJO RANGE, NO. 3606 (TYP.) ® EXTERIOR SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH, LA HABRA STUCCO, X-53 PURE IVORY (BASE 100) 0 2X WOOD FASCIA PAINTED WITH DUNN EDWARDS PAINTS, BLACK WALNUT DE6063 (TYP.) 0 RAIN GUTTER PAINTED WITH DUNN EDWARDS PAINTS, BLACK WALNUT DE6063 (TYP.) (?\ 4" UNDER-EAVE CEMENT PRECAST FOAM CORE MOLDING, COLOR TO MATCH \.':') LA HABRA STUCCO. X-2/8 TRABUCO (TYP.) C\ 4" CEMENT PRECAST FOAM CORE MOLDING. COLOR TO MATCH LA HABRA STUCCO_ \") X-2/8 TRABUCO (TYP.) � STONE VENEER BY CORONADO STONE PRODUCTS, OLD WORLD LEDGE \!_.) IN BROOKSIDE (TYP.) ® FRONT ENTRY DOOR, CAOBA DOORS, MODEL 101-TG in\ WROUGHT IRON RAILING, PAINTED WITH DUNN EDWARDS_\.':') 0£6062 TEA BAG (EARTHTONE) @ ANDERSEN WINDOWS & DOORS (SERIES 100) EXTERIOR COLOR SANDTONE t.:::;\ CEMENT PRECAST FOAM CORE CORBEL COLOR TO MATCH LA HABRA STUCCO � X-2/8 TRABUCO (TYP.) Q 10• CEMENT PRECAST FOAM CORE BAND, COLOR TO MATCH LA HABRA STUCCO, \t::) X-278 TRABUCO (TYP.) NOTES: 1.ROOF ASSEMBLY SHALL BE LISTED BY AN APPROVED TESTING AGENCY. 2.ALL WINDOWS SASH HT. FOR 2ND FLR. ARE@ 7'-0" HEIGHT. TOP OF ROOF 9 TP 2ND FLR. F.F TP 1ST FLR. F.F WALL LENGTH OF SECOND FLOOR FRONT FACING WALL 38.75' WITH 10' BEHIND FIRST FLOOR WALL: 21' + 2' = 23' RATIO : 23' 138.75' = 59 % (MORE THAN 40% ALLOWABLE) 9 m 1 6 3 4 5 lfffii1 � EAST ELEVATION ( SCALE : 1/8"= 1'-0" ) ( FRONT UNIT) 9 12 1 WEST ELEVATION ( SCALE : 1/8"= 1'-0" ) ( FRONT UNIT) REVISIONS BY . u z- I-z w � a. 0 ...J w > w C z C) - w C w I--...J w CJ z -' -' w 0 >--' � <( LL w -' CJ z en >-ll:'. 0 I-en N s: w z Date Scale Drawn Job Sheet z w ::;;D. 0..J w > w C' ' ' z (!)-"'w C' ' ' (!) z-z z < ..J D. 0 -:;; ". "' <( Nu,"' ON <C E w-o:a; "' u w�o lf) - 0 .. � ,,- X � � ©) w 2:t::: -=> '" lf) C '""' ED "' m > c--:,i..::..: � "' w co .. N >- -m w "' E � N <D � "' ;; �. � Ww ao f--ao . w > <( Cl w r-- I-r---.---I-0)0 <( _J u 0:: <( -0 :r: <( u w. 2: w -.---Cf) CV) 0 r--CV)0:: June 2016 As Shown J.L. 17-1016 A-2 Of Sheets (N) 6' HIGH C.B.W.TO REPLACE (E) 6' HIGH C FENCE (E)6' HIGH CHAIN-LINKFENCE TO REMOVE / (E)5' HIGH CHAIN-LINKFENCE TO REMOVE N 89°43'30" E 195.00' EX. NEIGHBOR HOUSE (E)4' HIGH CHAIN-LINKFENCE TO REMOVE (N)6' HIGH C.BW.20'.()" REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACKTO REPLACE (E) 6' HIGH C FENCE � N) CON . WALK AY AllMOUNTE TANKLESS ATER HEATE (E)6' HIGH C.BW. i'-IO _j 0.: II) 0 M 0 0 0 z DECORATIVE IRON SWING GATE,DUNN EDWARDS PAINTS TEA BAG DE6062 (EARTHTONE) "' (E)6' HIGH C.B.W. DRIVEWAY SLIDING IRONGATE, DUNN EDWARDS PAINTS TEA BAG DE6062 (EARTHTONE) 16" SQ_ SPLITE FACE PILASTERTO BE FINISHED WITH STUCCO TO MATCH HOUSE VAR PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE PROJECT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL. DECORATIVE IRON FENCE, DUNN EDWARDS PAINTS TEA BAG DE6062(EARTHTONE) 2 COARSES SPLIT FACE C.BTO BE FINISHED WITH STUCCO TO MATCH HOUSE "' FRONT YARD FENCE ELEVATION (N.T.S.) Landscaping Area Ratio Lot Size . 11,115 sq.ft. Landscaping Area: 5,999 / 11,115 = 53.97 % More Than 20% Minimum Required "Lawns and Planters are Included in theCalculations of the Landscaping Area" (E)6' HIGH C.B.W. C/ "' __ ] _________ _ Ll�E OF 2ND FLR AB0'1E COVERED PATIO 10-0"X 18-0" --, PRECISION C.B.W. TO BE FINISHED WITH STUCCO TO MATCH HOUSEON THE INTERIOR SIDE BLOCK WALL ELEVATION (N.T.S.) I ' I ' ' FAMILY ROOM 16--0'X 15 6" LEGEND : al I •11 �I I ----- riHHHri -f-L.LL.LL.LL.LL'-L..'-L..'-L'-LL.LL.L.LL.LL.LL.LLCL.'-L..'-L..'-LL.LL.LL.L.LL.LL.LLCL.'-L..CL.'-L-'-LL.LL.L.LL.LL.LL.LLCL.'-L..'-L..'-L'-L-L.LL.L.LL.LL.LL.LL'-L..c.d ______ _ � -l LANDSCAPING AREA RATIO DIAGRAM SCALE 1" = 16'-0" � LANDSCAPING AREA ( 5,999 sq.ft) ___ _J BEDROOM 1 10 9" X 13'-6' \ I ) 2-STORY I 1 SINGLE FAMILY 1: DWELLING I 1 DINING ROOM 13-6' X 10-3" LIVING ROOM 15"-3" X 10 3' I I I I I _______ _J: I '--- - - I -----------, � - -- r-7 7 7-/7V///,1_J////,, 7 / / / /,,1//// / /1L/'_/_-< • /)/ " 775" MAX I / ) 3-CAR GARAGE I / I (CLEAR 30'X20') I / ,r---7 I / /) f---LINE OF .,mo I I I FLR. �Efo�E/ I 1 / /1 1 I /Ii I / / I I / /j 20'-0" (E)6' HIGH C.BW. (E)4"0 TREETO REMOVE (E)2"0 TREETO REMOVE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK NEW CONG. BLOCK WALL EXISTING CONG. BLOCK WALL PROPERTY LINE EX. NEIGHBOR HOUSE SITE NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPING AREAS, INCLUDING THE PARKWAY, SHALL BEAUTOMATICALLY IRRIGATED. 2. LOT DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONDUCTED TO THE STREET OR ASSHOWN ON THE PLANS. 3 DO NOT BLOCK NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 4. REPLACE ALL BROKEN, CRACKED OR UPHEAVED CURB, CURB &GUTTER, SIDE WALK AND DRIVEWAY APRONS AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 5. A SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTTO PERFORM ALL WORK WITHIN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6. ALL UTILITY SERVICES, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, SEWER, WATER, GAS, AND ELECTRIC POWER, SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 7. RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLERS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL NEWCONSTRUCTION. 8. A SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR SWIMMING POOLS, SPA,RETAINING WALLS, ACCESSORY BUILDING, AND DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS. 9 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE CONTROL JOINTS ON ALL CONCRETE FLAT WORK. 10.PROVIDE 6" MIN CONTRASTING COLOR ADDRESS NUMBER ONBUILDING VISIBLE TO STREET. 11.ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SHALLBE RELOCATED AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE. 12. UPON APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT, A FENCE AND WALL PLAN APPLICATIONSHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR APPROVAL. 13.INTERIOR SIDE OF THE NEW & EXISTING PERIMETER BLOCK WALLS SHALL BEFINISHED WITH STUCCO TO MATCH THE HOUSE SHEET INDEX A-1 A-2 PROJECT INFORMATION SITE PLAN FRONT UNIT FLOOR PLANS FRONT UNIT ELEVATIONS REQUIRED 20'-0" FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING : FRONT YARD AREA : 57' X 20' = 1,140 SF PATIO 50% OF FRONTAGE AREA IS 570 SF FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING 608 SF (53.33 % ) LANDSCAPING IS MORE THAN 50 % OF FRONT YARD PROJECT INFORMATION TITLE : NEW 2-STORY SFD JOB ADDRESS : 3731 N. CHARLOTTE AVE., ROSEMEAD, CA. 91770 OWNER MR WEI SHI LI (626)417 -9980 APN 5371 -003 -034 ZONING R 1 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZE 57' X 195' = 11,115 SF ALLOWABLE FAR : ( 11,115 X 35%) = 3,890 SF PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA = 1,828 SF PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA = 1,417 SF TOTAL LIVING AREA (1,828 + 1,417) = 3,245 SF PROPOSED PORCH AREA PROPOSED COVERED PATIO AREA = 180 SF PROPOSED WALK DECK 1 AREA PROPOSED WALK DECK 2 AREA = 63 SF = 79 SF 49 SF PROPOSED ATT. 3-CAR GARAGE AREA = 736 SF (GROSS) 2ND FLOOR TO 1ST FLOOR AREA RATIO: (1,417 + 63 + 79 ) I ( 1,828+ 736) = 60 .80 % "The 2nd floor area is less than 75% of the 1st floor area" TOTAL FAR. : 3,245 SF< 3,890 SF (ALLOWABLE ) LOT COVERAGE : (1,828 + 49 +180 + 736) I 11,115 =2,793 I 11,115 = 25.13 % TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TYPE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING CODE FIRE SPRINKLERS VBR3 I U : 2017 LAGO RESIDENTIAL CODE : REQUIRED ( FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED PER NFPA 13D STANDARDS ) � -' 0 � • "w • i'-IO _j 0.: WM WM {E) 2"0 TREETO REMOVE (N)3-11" HIGGATE WI AUi+// -,:;,.,-1"-J . I __J SLI 0 WJN TE ' < s I < � I ,I � ' I •� > � 25'.()" SRW 18'-0" (�) 24" BOX STREET TRESPECIMEN & LOCATION TIB.D. BY CITY FORESTEf< , , ING ENERI ci >� I if) 5' u >z Q' I w � • � > I > I < I < I s I < I , I , ' it' ' -I'--. -� J , I , . --, : -Is J . .' '�.SMH { \ " / , __ 1 I _f i----=�- -H __J •' J f--��-�",J, _,,' _,J I -1 I •I• _,i,-_ J •: If.._•' I �-' _J ...r JH 'J,® ;, --, -'" -t l.3.7.31cN, CHARLOm AVE. e:, ... " S BJECT SITE \ . ' \ 1 I -7 I I • � f-----��t-1 < ' � 1.c�---�"''"'+IL . .,,,._ ' .-� I � - [ C-�4--,--.��IL----�-----�.---_-,-.�n. 0'""-.�--='-�--c=-,�� 837 -'ITVl MA��. , 8"200 �203 E IYl.irsh�II SI ,_....... 1 -�1J��, � -,1 I I �. f� � . I REVISIONS BY z �� 53 ;_"§ � � '" = ;;;::::s�r:c:�fil��Hi:n::�2=�� ;'?n ��;§2�o233� � � � �ffi �� ::l56g��g2::;::: <,,;-:f�3�llic},::,§�!:;.:f-:1 Q��g;;::��8�2= 5� ��Ed§�§�;:� �.-cc:ffi;;':=>--�<..-r �� ;,;�"'='2=��=��0� fu_ffi�O��E:'38�6:l� ��<_;��3Fg��Q ��;::��'.;:25g��§ _;, !;;! = = c,:: "' = = _, L.LJ = gg�. :::::�§��8 D :7 0..U c::,Clc'.c,:,ee::c,(l)c:::, �B��d��a:i�� i:t8::5r��g�� ,;==,,-,2:2r-=;5v,;:.:::Q ��=:i:co...6::::=60= ��F�ffi85�� _,a!��f?�:,;:,;:6�2=� . u z - I-z zw 0 w ::;; - D.. :;; ""'0 <( "'N ..J u 00 a.w = D N E "" 0 w w -0 C ::; "' N ...J w "' 0 if) -0 '0 � w 'Q' X '"" ©)> "' u_ z w 2: w (!)t::-=> '"-if) C "' '" C "' E w D "' m> N = � 00 z w = " ' N -·-' >--m C)w "' E '� N '" � "' "" -(!) > -en z w � -w w z = f-z " -C <= ..JD..w I--...J w CJ z -'-'w s: .w0 >>--' <( Cl � w I'-- <( I-I'-- LL ..--w I-0)-' 0 <( CJ _J uz 0:: en <( -0 >-:r: <( ll:'. u 0 w f--.2: en w N ..--Cf) s: CV)0 w I'--z CV) 0:: Date June 2016 Scale As Shown Drawn JL Job 17-1016 Sheet A-1 Of Sheets Exhibit C Planning Commission Meeting June 4, 2018 Pae 15 of 15 5371 3 l �;��---,oo�i· f.REE� TfY,,CT � TRACT NO_ 3599 .M.R 3.�-8.? M 8. 41-45 I_RAC_T NO..; 683_2 M_a 7jl-Ogl PA��L�P ___ -·-_.Ii? �.:12�.:e • ·1�� 1:1200 &Z13 �219 EXHIBIT "C" • � +--�=,---+-!----:.___-I �® .. ,,,, 0 " ,, - fd:1-�5 �© ,,, !:,® "® ,J s, ,..,..,.. J:0 -� , .. };© � M>-1RSHALL -{16)_---t--� 0• 0,0 (D11 (;):i 0•3 ! '' (;;\ . \ I SUBJECT SITE -, .• ..... ",:,1,,: , ,·:.• I