CC - Item 5B - Minutes of April 24, 2018MINUTES OF THE
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 24, 2018
The special meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Steven Ly at
6:03 p.m. in the Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard,
Rosemead, California.
PRESENT: Mayor Ly, Mayor Pro Tem Clark, Council Members Armenta and Low
ABSENT: Council Member Alarcon
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Molleda, City A
Director of Community Development Kim, Director
of Parks and Recreation Yugar, and City Clerk Herm
1. WORKSHOP
A. Zoning Code Updates
Community Devel
continuation from
meeting workshop.
Signage Ordinance.
Lao
Director of Finance Lieu,
Ramirez, Interim Director
stated the presentation is a
i the March 27" City Council
for Exception Application and
with the following items
• Proposed new process will give the Community Development Director
authority to allow an exception to certain development standards;
• Key topics include streamlined process to be business friendly; and allow
for conforming enlargements and/or new structures to proceed without a
Minor Exception;
• Current extensive process involves enlargement to a non -conforming
structure; and the new proposed streamlining process includes creating a
new application which would allow the director of Community
Development and/or designee to approve Minor Exceptions request.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Clark's questions regarding how often consent is
not obtained from the abutting property owners; and if the proposed streamlining
process provides the abutting property owners the ability to give consent or express
their concerns, City Planner Lily Valenzuela explained it is rare for consent not to
be given.
City Planner Valenzuela continued with the presentation with the following items
related to the Sign Ordinance:
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.11
Page 1 of 12
• Existing code adopted in 1971 has had a few minor revisions and no
comprehensive update;
• Goals of the sign code is to create clarity and flexibility; and
• Types of controversial signs currently include freestanding, digital display,
and electronic messages.
Council Member Armenta thanked staff for bringing this issue forward, as she has
received a number of concerns from residents regarding signs.
In response to Mayor Ly's question regarding the controversy surrounding
freestanding signs, City Planner Valenzuela stated height is the primary issue as
sign owners want the signs as high as possible, where the surrounding residents
view this as a visual blight.
Resident Brian Lewin suggested the City Council consider handling Minor
Exceptions by noticing residents and conducting a 30 -day comment period to allow
the abutting property owners to comment. If opposition is received, a hearing
would be held depending on the scale of the project. If no opposition is received,
the Director of Community Development would review and have the authority to
make a determination. In regard to the Sign Ordinance, Mr. Lewin suggested the
City Council consider a removal requirement for new businesses to remove or
properly incorporate any old signage; as Well as establishing a time limit for any
new business to operate with banner signage. Additionally, he expressed his
opposition to pole signs due to the height, brightness, and unattractiveness; as well
as electronic billboards and the proximity, to residential areas. For digital and
electronic message signs, he asked ---the City Council to consider incorporating
restrictions on size, brightness, and location.
Mayor, Pro Tem Clark agreed with Mr. Lewin's suggestion regarding the Minor
Exception process for the notification of the abutting property owners so they could
voice their concerns to an interim body that could oversee an appeal process.
-mentaconcurred with Mayor Pro Tem Clark and added the
be more defined to minimize its interpretation and provide
Council Member Low expressed support for Mr. Lewin's suggestion to provide the
abutting property owners a means of input for a specific period of time.
Mayor Ly also agreed with Mr. Lewin's comments regarding the Minor Exception
process. He asked staff to look at a way to avoid using the Planning Commission
in order to expedite the process for property owners and help them avoid costly
delays. He suggested creating an internal design review corarnittee comprised of
the Community Development Director, the City Planner, and another staff member
to adjudicate the matter. Lastly, he added the applicant of the Minor Exception
should be responsible for the cost of notifying the abutting property owners.
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minuses ofApril24, 2018
Page 2 of 12
Council Member Low noted in looking at the Minor Exception streamlined process,
it does not appear to go to the Planning Commission. Suggested if the addition is
not a separate unit and is more than the 20 percent deviation, it should not go before
the Planning Commission because it's part of the existing home.
Assistant Planner Lao explained it depends on the type of Minor Exception being
requested. Planning Commission review is not required for a 20 percent deviation
from current development standards or a conforming addition, only review by the
Community Development Director. However, to add a new structure with an
existing non -conforming structure, resulting in two units on the property, requires
consent from all abutting property owners and Planning Commission review.
Council Member Armenia stressed not
deviation to go before the Planning Commi&
percent deviation to go before the Planning
home on Walnut Grove Avenue that did an
than the primary home. It's going to complicate thing
that the City Council have to answer to the residents.
Assistance Planner Lao explained that the property
was under the 2,500 square feet so it did not need to
The 20 percent deviation is for setbacks, for example
1.0 plus and we round down, sothey are able to bui
setbacks were met, so no minor exception was requin
projects under 20 percent
require projects with over 20
sion. For example, there is a
to the back, which is bigger
us in a predicament
Mrs. Armenta is referencing
go through a design review.
5 feet, 20 percent of that is
J 4 feet. But in that case all
Assistant Planner Lao affirmed the Council's direction to continue notifying the
abutting i neighbors for, projects requesting Minor Exceptions. The noticing period
will give the public 10 business days to review and provide comments of the
project. However, any objections to the project will go through a hearing before the
Community Development Director. Lastly, if a new structure is being built, the
project will go to the Planning Commission for review.
In response to Council Member Low's question for clarification of the 20 percent
deviation, Assistant Planner Lao explained if an existing home has five feet of
setback and continue to add, they can do so by requesting a 20 percent deviation. If
they want a three feet setback, staff would consider a variance and that will have to
go before the Planning Commission for review.
Mayor Pro Tem Clark asked if there are enlargements and non -conforming
structures with or without 20 percent deviation, right now the process is
cumbersome. You will notify abutting neighbors and the new structure with an
existing non -conforming structure on the subject site would be the same process.
City Planner Valenzuela reiterated from hearing council's comments tonight, staff
will keep the current process.
Mayor Ly explained Mr. Lewin's suggestion gives a 10 business day notice to
neighbors' to respond, rather than having the property owner collect signatures. The
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018
Page 3 of 12
Community Development Director will conduct a hearing to adjudicate the project
if needed.
Mayor Pro Tem Clark asked if there is an appeal process to the Planning
Commission if somebody wants to appeal a project.
Community Development Director Kim replied any decision made by staff or the
Director is appealable to the Planning Commission and the Commission's decision
is appealable to the City Council.
Council Member Armenta noted that all four
Lewin's comments. She reiterated that she
electrical signs that are a distraction such as ch
Council Member Low expressed
usage, as well as, digital signs th,
were okay.
icilmembers agreed with Mr.
,es complaints of unpleasant
lights.
signs, depending on their
strical signs that are small
Mayor Ly recommended that staff work on a set of design guidelines and perhaps
asking the Beautification Committee'to assist on the visual aspect of signs.
Council Member Armenia inquired how the city is going to address banners with
businesses. She explained there are businesses getting cited because they did not
know the required permits.
City Planner Valenzuela assured the City Council that staff would work on
incorporating the banner process into the sign code. In the meanwhile, new business
owners obtaining business licenses will be notified about banner rules as part of the
on
include the complete removal of old signs
Planner Valenzuela explained staff is working with the city attorney's office
corporate standards of old signs. In the meantime, staff requires business
,rs to repaint and fix or remove old signs.
Mayor Pro Tem Clark asked for the closed session items moved to the special
workshop meeting.
City Attorney Richman explained the closed session item is scheduled for the
regular City Council meeting and due to the Brown Act guidelines, she did not
recommend moving closed session to the special workshop meeting.
Mayor Ly requested that all closed session items be placed at the six o'clock special
meetings.
Mayor Ly recessed the workshop at 6:43 p.m.
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes ofApril24, 2018
Page 4 of 12
RECONVENE TO REGULAR MEETING
The regular meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Steven Ly at
7:00 p.m. in the Rosemead City Council Chamber located at
8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California.
PRESENT: Mayor Ly, Mayor Pro Tem Clark, Council Members Armenta and Low
ABSENT: Council Member Alarcon
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council
INVOCATION was led by Mayor Pro Tem Clark.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Molleda,
Richman, Finance Director Lieu, Community,
Ramirez, Interim Parks and Recreation Directs
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Resident Velia Navarro e
Garvey Avenue and San
report the issue and later
Navarro alerted the City
City
I City Manager Tsujiuehi, City Attorney
hent Director Kim;,Public Works Director
and City Clerk Hernandez
ith illegal dumping on the corner of
She called Public Safety Center to
mping was still not addressed. Mrs.
was addressed promptly.
illegal dumping was in public right-of-way
Mrs. Navarro also spoke about a raccoon loose in her property and asked the city
for assistance on addressing the wild animal issue.
Chief of Police Lt. Hanhlem replied Sheriff Deputies do not handle animal control
unless an animal is attacking somebody,
City Manager Molleda stated animal control staff will contact Mrs. Navarro and
speak to the Humane Society to try and help with the wild animal issue.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Clark's question on how other cities address storing
homeless belongings, City Attorney Richman explained when personal belongings
are from the homeless the City must notify them where their items will be
temporarily stored.
Council Member Armenta stated the City has a container to store personal
belongings for up to 90 days.
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018
Page 5 of 12
3.
4.
5.
PRESENTATIONS
A. Introduction of Assistant City Manager Greg Tsujiuchi
City Manager Molleda introduced and welcomed Greg Tsujiuchi as Rosemead's
new Assistant City Manager.
Greg Tsujiuchi thanked the City Council, staff, and the community for giving him
the opportunity to serve the City.
City Council welcomed Mr. Tsujiuchi to the City of Rosemead.
B. Recognition of the Rosemead High School Academic Decathlon
Mayor Ly along with the City Councilrecognized Decathlon Coach and English
teacher Eric Burgess and the Rosemead High School Academic Decathlon. He
commended the decathlon team for their first -place finish in.Division III and 9'
place overall in Los Angeles County to become the highest scoring team in the
history of the five schools of the El Monte Union High School District. The City
Council thanked the coach, parents, teachers, and presented certificates of
recognition to the students for their hard work.,
Coach
the stu
and
No. 2018-25
cognition and commended
hard work.
:cathlonteam has put Rosemead on the map
commitment to the community and the kids.
items 6A and 6E are tabled to the
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS
AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $568,317.41 NUMBERED
99557 THROUGH NUMBER 99678 INCLUSIVELY
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-25
B. City Council Meeting Minutes
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018
Page 6 of 12
Recommendation: Approve the minutes from the regular meeting on April 10,
2018.
C. Protected Left Turn Installation on Ivar Avenue at Valley Boulevard
Recommendation: Approve the installation of a protected northbound left turn
signal and a protected southbound left turn signal from Ivar Avenue onto Valley
Boulevard.
ACTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Clark and seconded by Council Member
Armenta to approve Consent Calendar items SA, 5B, and 5C. Motion was carried
by the following vote: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Low, and Ly; ABSENT:
Alarcon
6. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER &`STAFF
A. Annual Comprehensive Fee Resolution Update
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-24, Annual Comprehensive Fee
Schedule.
Item 6A was tabled to another meeting.
B. License -Agreement — 8828
Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a
License Agreement with Hartford Hotel Investment Inc. for a community garden
use of a property, located at 8828 Glendon Way, Rosemead CA 91770.
Director of Community Development Kim reported staff has looked at the concept
of leasing a vacant lot near the Hartford Hotel on a short-term lease that can be
utilized to create a community garden for seasonal produce. He noted that a "park-
like" structure would take city resources and staff to manage and operate as opposed
to a community garden, once built, can be maintained by the seasonal producers.
The location is considered by the City due to the land being vacant, relatively flat,
the land is half an anchor in size, month to month lease, and the project is supported
by the Parks Commission:
In conclusion Director of Community Development Kim suggested developing a
programming guide and citing improvement concepts if Council decides to
authorize the agreement.
Parks Commissioner Chen Lin thanked the City Council and staff on their
consideration for the community garden. He highlighted the garden's ability to
address the eye sore and blight of vacant property and provides an interesting
recreational opportunity for Rosemead residents, which has support from the Parks
Commission. Commissioner Lin cited that while the community garden is
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018
Page 7 of 12
temporary, it can also be seen as an investment opportunity for the health and safety
of Rosemead residents. Lastly, Commissioner Lin asked Council to attach a
learning agenda to the proposition which will help gather data and scale the project
to other properties that would hopefully develop into something more permanent.
Mayor Ly contended the learning agenda is a great idea and opened the Council to
comments or questions.
Council Member Armenta referenced a discussion with the Beautification
Committee about the restraints of community gardens. She questioned the mobility
of the garden and raised concerns that residents may lose out on their personal
investments of the garden to redevelopment.
Mayor Ly responded the stations will
needed.
City Manager Molleda menti(
Beautification Committee for
Mayor Pro Tem 1
to homelessness.
Community
properly sec
City
to which
staff and
at 8828
vote: A
you could take your garden if
Council that a design review will go to the
in relation
nent Director Kim reassured the community garden will be
ferencing to other community;, gardens visited by staff, the
have a door and lock system that is exclusively accessible to
Pro Tem Clark that the Interim Director
and application for the process.
ut the inclusion of school districts within the plan,
responded that once a plan is established between
;s can be made.
Moved by Council Member Low and seconded by Council Member
to authorize the City Manager to execute a license agreement with
3otel Investment Inca for a community garden use of a property located
tendon Way, Rosemead CA 91770. Motion was carried by the following
:S: Armenta, Clark, Low, and Ly; and ABSENT: Alarcon
C. Draft Curb Marking Policy and Procedures for Red, Green, Yellow, and White
Curbs
Recommendation: That the City Council review and approve the Draft Curb
Marking Policy and Procedures for Red, Green, Yellow, and White Curbs.
Director of Public Works Ramirez reported staff has prepared a Draft Curb Marking
Policy and Procedures for Red, Green, Yellow, and White Curbs document to
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018
Page 8 of 12
identify the procedures and approval criteria associated with installing curb
markings within Rosemead. On April 5, 2018, the Traffic Commission reviewed
the policy and procedures.
Confused on staff's recommendation to strikethrough fees associated with curb
marking requests, Mayor Low asked Director of Public Works Ramirez whether
fees are typical for these procedures.
Director of Public Works Ramirez explained that fees associated with curb
markings are used to pay for conducting studies. While fees can be applicable;
funding exists for this type of service each year in the Public Works budget and the
applicant does not have to pay for requesting a color curb marking.
ACTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Clark and seconded by Council Member Low
to approve the Draft Curb Marking Policy and Procedures for Red, Green, Yellow,
and White Curbs. Motion was carriedby the following vote: AYES: Armenta,
Clark, Low, and Ly; and ABSENT: Alarcon
D. California Natural Resource Agency's Urban Greening Grant — Duff Park
Recommendation: That the City Council appropriate $805,033 from the unassigned
general fund balance for the Duff Park Project. Out of this amount, $520,533 will
be reimbursed through the _California Natural Resource Agency's Urban Greening
Grant and $284,500 will be the City's required match contribution.
Director of Public Works Ramirez reported the City applied for funding under the
California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Greening Grant (Urban Greening
Grant) for the amount of $987,000 for the Duff Park Improvement Project. This
new park development will be located in the open space area of Duff School,
`adjacent to Garvey Park, and will consist of the installation of a walking trail,
volleyball court, basketball/badminton court, landscaping, irrigation, and other
miscellaneous improvements. The City has been informed that this project has
been selected for funding under the Urban Greening Grant in the amount of
;$520,533. As part of the grant requirements, the City will be required to provide a
$284,500 match for a total project cost of $805,033.
Mayor Ly commended staff for securing the Urban Greening Grant and the city's
commitment to green project initiatives.
ACTION: Moved by Council Member Armenta and seconded by Council Member
Low to appropriate $805,033 from the unassigned general fund balance for the Duff
Park Project. Out of this amount, $520,533 will be reimbursed through the
California Natural Resource Agency's Urban Greening Grant and $284,500 will be
the City's required match contribution. Motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: Armenta, Clark, Low, and Ly; ABSENT: Alarcon
E. Approval of Professional Services Agreement for Public Works Inspection
Services
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018.
Page 9 of 12
Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into
a three (3) year PSA with SCB Inspection, with an option to extend the PSA for
two (2) additional one-year periods, to provide public works inspection services at
an annual cost not to exceed $150,000.
Item 6E was tabled for a future meeting.
7. MATTERS FROM MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
A. Mayor's Appointments for 2018-19
Mayor Ly announced the City (
appointments to the City Clerk prior to
Lewin if he was interested to be the sec
Roundtable.
Mr. Lewin affirmed he could serve as the second
with the Beautification Committee meetings.
Mayor Ly al
Joint Powers
Mayor Ly appointed Mayor Pro Tem Clark as
mitted their preferences for
In addition, he asked Mr. Brian
to the LAX Community Noise
it does not interfere
as the alternate to the California
Public Safety Connections
the contact for the SR -60 Coalition Joseph
[ember in South El Monte.
ACTION: Moved by Council Member Armenta and seconded by Council Member
Low to approve the Mayor's appointments for the 2018-19 fiscal year. The motion
was carried by the following vote: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Low, and Ly;
ABSENT: Alarcon
B. City Council Comments
Council Member Armenta thanked City Manager Molleda for her responsiveness
regarding Mrs. Navarro's concerns and welcomed Assistant City Manager Greg
Tsujiuchi to the City of Rosemead.
Mayor Pro Tem Clark brought forth the issue of weathered curb home addresses
and asked Public Works Ramirez Director if the city has a repaint and replace
policy.
Director of Public Works Ramirez responded that there is funding allocated within
next year's budget to paint half of required homes one year and the remaining half
the following year with a potential beginning date in the summer.
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018
Page 10 of 12
Mayor Ly cited Brown Act restrictions preventing further discussion of the issue,
and instead proposed issuing a memo and or agenizing the item.
In light of recent tragedies involving the terrorist use of trucks, Mayor Pro Tem
Clark suggested the placement of preventive measures, such as barriers, to protect
public dining areas when approving major projects in the Garvey Specific Plan.
Mayor Ly acknowledged Mayor Pro Tem Clark's concerns as legitimate, affirming
there are substantial preventive measures within the Garvey Specific Plan.
Community Development Director Kim reaffirmed there are security measures for
outdoor dining area that will be put into place along with fencing and landscaping
modifications.
Councilmember Armenta comma
effectiveness of the in -ground
Elementary School. However, s
regards to Fern Avenue, when
Member Armenta requested a st
support the implementation of r
the Public Works staff for the beautiful and
;walk lighting implemented at Savannah
and vehicle speed concerns were raised in
ly Elementary School is located. Council
,at analvzes the street for measures that can
Rosemead accessible and safe passage
Safe Route to School grants and stress
g. CLOSED SESSION
-r goal is to give every school in
s. She questioned the order of the
on Bitely Elementary School.
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Number of Cases: 1
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION
5
Pursuant to Government Code Section 4a No.
B
Case Name: People v. Saman, Inc. (City of Rosemead) LA
SC Case No. BC
698690
Mayor Ly recessed the meeting at 7:55 p.m. to closed session and reconvened back
to opensession atl813 p.m.
City Attorney Richman reported there was no reportable action taken in closed
session
Rosemead City Council Special and Regular Meeting
Minutes of April 24, 2018
Page 11 of 12
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:13 p.m. The next regular City Council meeting is scheduled
to be held on May 8, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. in the Rosemead City Hall Council Chamber.
Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk
APPROVED:
Steven Ly, Mayor