PC - Item 3A - Design Review 18-03 at 8801-8845 Valley BoulevardROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 2018
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW 18-03
8801-8845 VALLEY BOULEVARD
��9�rih4/_1�i'1
420 Boyd Street, LLC has submitted a Design Review Application (DR 18-03) requesting
to renovate the primary facade (Valley Blvd. frontage) of an existing commercial shopping
center. The subject site is located at 8801-8845 Valley Boulevard (APN: 5391-009-001
and 5391-009-003) in a Central Business District with Residential/Commercial Mixed -Use
Development and Design Overlays (CBD/RC-MUDO/D-O) zone. The proposed project
also consists of various site improvements such as the rehabilitation of the existing
parking lot, landscaping, shopping cart containment stations, locksmith structure, and an
upgraded trash enclosure. The proposed project would not add any new floor area to the
property. Approval of a Design Review is required for all significant improvements (per
Section 17.28.020.A) requiring a building permit or visible changes in form, texture, color,
exterior fagade, or landscaping within a Design Overlay zone.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines exempts
projects consisting of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or
minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment,
or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing
at the time of the lead agency's determination. Accordingly, DR 18-03 is classified as a
Class 1 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Section 15301 of CEQA guidelines.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 18-17 with
findings (Exhibit "A"), and APPROVE Design Review 18-03, subject to the 32 conditions
outlined in Attachment "A" attached hereto.
/0
B/7</
7
922/
E8
/§ƒ§\
§
\®<
CD
/[L
®`J
r
wn»
p w=z
EL
\
\»2\[
\)�
ƒ«�[
0
(D
\CD �
\
\=CD
CL
E\
f=®2
0
z
e
E
em(e
c
(
(
§\§¥
%
{//%[
-
-
a&W±
2
§
g=o>�
kE\
[
3
.'a
/
\
{/gE
E
=»Im
n
&E
ooa==
@go
m
e
- o
D
E
;
CD
\2//
$
R%
W00m0
o
CD Q.
$G&
g(fE
ERG
-EQ®o
=o
�°
Ems)
EE7G«
\ \
� w
CD
CL0Xm
0.I=
_ /
E/
\/(2k
\n0
®6 =
&w§
«E]n=
go=.
=2M
\
\(\\\
{
,\\
\ \s
}
_
&�3or
/■*
\2==
Cl) m,.
=®Be+
s#
o@x
`a&
+ƒ
[/ / E
(
\/j
\\
J`®&$
§2//
CD
`
k(j
22
cn
a3 CD
§§
Cn
)CD
Ee\
¥
7@/E
ED
2 2
CD
/gE
to
9
/\0
}ktCCD O
CL -
Fu-CD
CD
(n
/0
B/7</
7
/yz
E8
/§ƒ§\
§
\®<
CD
�
� � cn
®
\i
0 o
\»2\[
2
0
(D
-
\=CD
CL
E\
CO ®]\\E
j
z
0 0
q
77
{//%[
gE
§
g=o>�
CLc-0
v
3
.'a
\E=E»
I
=g
=»Im
n
&E
ooa==
@go
m
e
- o
D
%
;
CD
R%
W00m0
o
$G&
g(fE
T
-EQ®o
=o
�°
\«%±/
\ \
� w
CD
CL0Xm
E/
D
«E]n=
cn
{
Co //k{
}
_
0(n >
01 CL
CD
Cl) m,.
§g
cn
U) 0 CD rr
CD CD
e,ao4
\\
J`®&$
_
CD
/)
co
®r0
§§
Cn
)CD
@m
7@/E
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 3 of 18
East
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Land Use:
West
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Land Use:
DISCUSSION
Mixed Use: Residential/Commercial (30 du/ac; 3 stories)
and Medium Density Residential
CBD/RC-MUDO/D-O (Central Business District with
Residential/Commercial Mixed -Use Development and
Design Overlays) and R-2 (Light Multiple Residential)
Commercial and Residential
Commercial and Low Density Residential
C -3/D -O (Medium Commercial with Design Overlay),
P (Automobile Parking), and
R-1 (Single -Family Residential)
Commercial and Residential
As illustrated in Exhibit "B", the applicant is proposing to remodel the exterior front fagade
(Valley Boulevard frontage) of an existing commercial shopping center. According to
Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(A)(1), in the Design Overlay zone, Design
Review procedures shall be followed for all significant improvements requiring a building
permit or visible changes in form, texture, color, exterior fagade, or landscaping.
Per Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.010, the purpose of the design overlay
zone is to promote orderly development so that buildings, structures, signs and
landscaping will be harmonious within a specified area; to prevent the development of
structures or uses which are not of acceptable exterior design or appearance or are of
inferior quality or likely to have a depreciating or negative effect on the local environment
or surrounding area by reasons of use, design, appearance or other criteria affecting
value.
The proposed project, Design Review 18-03, would not add new floor area to the existing
building, however the new modern commercial facade will increase the overall height of
the existing building. At the highest point, the height will increase from 24'-8 inches to 27'-
6". The applicant is proposing to screen the existing mechanical equipment by adding a
modern perforated metal screen that would complement the commercial facade to the
existing parapets. The scope of work within this proposal includes an exterior fagade
renovation and various site improvements such as the rehabilitation of the existing
parking lot, landscaping, shopping cart containment stations, locksmith structure, and an
upgraded trash enclosure.
Elevations
The applicant is proposing to modernize the entire fagade of the existing shopping center.
Since the project site is located in "Downtown Rosemead", Staff has worked closely with
the applicant to attain a design that would satisfy the Downtown Rosemead Design
Guidelines and be aesthetically pleasing. Various elements have been added to provide
O
O
�.
O
M
M.
N
m
_
w
M
W
X
C
41
N
O
O
0
Q
N
O
O
M
<
(D
O
<
CL
�
w
m
��
a
0
0.
m -
m
�
w
Da
)
CD
Q
T
O
G!
_
n
'-<
:3
v
w
O
w
w
a0
w
CL
na
a
a
Q -
CD w 0
M
M
3 (D
N
w
o
rn
�
uri
2
D
�p
2
w
cn
a
_
CD �
w
_
j O w
cn
(D
0
E
ao
0
0
34
O
CD
co
CD
O
O
w
K
3
CD
w
w
0
0
Cn
j
ca
CD
(D
0
O
O
O
N
w
a
3
0
M.
N
lQ N En -0 I m o (O '6 0 X 3 CD 0 3
= (= N O W '6 -O N O (D CD o 3 'O
w 3 O (D 7 w (D O '�
N '-�. O . O "a O 3 < (o O
<< a w >" (n w O =� -O Q CD M CD 7 C w yy, =� w
'p (D 0- O w cn 0 .r Al O CD -0 ... Q. Cn
. 7 w w O vi "O �' w 'O 7= CD Co w CD � (ii
CCD CD w ww 3 070 a 70 a- a
S w O- N 0 1 O -{ O O? -0 N CD 'a. -O
O Cl) cn
0 0 O (Q N 'O 0, 0, a 0 O Fn ;I (Q
co o =� 0 0(Q-°0 0 �a CD 0
0 CND 0 -0 7 '� CQ CD N, 3 D -oo � SD
00o-0wo°c. wCDw 3w3n0"-0
3,_,_ow��0C CnmCC0O �'w�
M 0° 0 w CD o c '0 w-0 p1
CD N 40 CD
CD (o CD O CD. X F N 3 O (D o CD CLw, "' `< C -0
CD ° CD a� 3 w CD cn may
m °c_0 Qy� ma �aCO'aCD � ''(o 0
Cc: m Q.0 0 0 o 0 w o'0•Cn 3
0
5- C cn o 0 =r C: — < 'z CD
(7 CD
0 `G ,X.. cn O O' a 0 (O Q 7 C CFD � a CD �
(Q CE M.0 sa-0 CD3 0 _0 m CD �Do
a0 CD 0� o �.3 * 0 w 0 0 0 0
o D „3a� CD0 C7 000m
0 0 0 �_o w 0. aw (Do 3 I
0 w
CL w�ma<w 3Cnam
o m 0 3r 0 m :0 ��CD c 5�
nwornm5(a0CD 3'0 -.0com
w 0 w CD -0 � �� s0 w 0 0 M.
CD ? .+ a (O = O (3D 0 CD (D w j
O (3 =r co(D �: CD (D w w C2 0- O y' CD w
(D a N Qo
l<Ql<CDmw�CDZ5cn m3am
0. o
(n
CD
(n
CC w
7
WCD
N
CD
l< ("
o
CD 3
m
pi a
cn CD
Cn
w (o
o ?
CL
w 3
m
0 CD
0 (D
CD
CD
c y
CL
o a
o (D
cn3
O CD
B Cn
CD CD
O
0
w
j
CO
X
CD
o'
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 5 of 18
Site Improvements
Shopping Cart Containment Stations
The applicant is proposing to improve the main shopping cart containment station located
in front of the existing supermarket with an opaque stucco wall to screen the shopping
carts. In addition, the applicant is also proposing to re -paint the existing shopping cart
containment stations that are located throughout the parking lot to complement the
proposed commercial fagade.
Parking Lot and Landscapinq
The applicant is proposing to re -stripe and re -slurry seal the existing parking lot and
rehabilitate all existing landscaping.
Trash Enclosure
The existing trash enclosure will be improved with a solid roof cover and self-closing doors
and will be re -painted to complement the proposed commercial facade.
Existing Locksmith Structure
The existing locksmith structure located near the south property line will be re -roofed with
dark grey shingles and the body of the structure will be repainted to a light grey color to
complement the proposed commercial fagade renovation.
MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS
According to Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(A)(1), in the Design Overlay
zone, Design Review procedures shall be followed for all improvements requiring a
building permit or visible changes in form, texture, color, exterior fagade, or landscaping.
Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(C), provides the criteria by which the
Planning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an
application:
A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposed
building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general
neighborhood.
Gra y
Metal
Black
Metal
.w
Dunn Edwards -Celluloid
Metal
II alfa o jes'
Dunn Edwards -Industrial Age
Metal
504 C
Qontitnmert,
Clay
La Habra Stucco
Site Improvements
Shopping Cart Containment Stations
The applicant is proposing to improve the main shopping cart containment station located
in front of the existing supermarket with an opaque stucco wall to screen the shopping
carts. In addition, the applicant is also proposing to re -paint the existing shopping cart
containment stations that are located throughout the parking lot to complement the
proposed commercial fagade.
Parking Lot and Landscapinq
The applicant is proposing to re -stripe and re -slurry seal the existing parking lot and
rehabilitate all existing landscaping.
Trash Enclosure
The existing trash enclosure will be improved with a solid roof cover and self-closing doors
and will be re -painted to complement the proposed commercial facade.
Existing Locksmith Structure
The existing locksmith structure located near the south property line will be re -roofed with
dark grey shingles and the body of the structure will be repainted to a light grey color to
complement the proposed commercial fagade renovation.
MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS
According to Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(A)(1), in the Design Overlay
zone, Design Review procedures shall be followed for all improvements requiring a
building permit or visible changes in form, texture, color, exterior fagade, or landscaping.
Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(C), provides the criteria by which the
Planning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an
application:
A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposed
building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general
neighborhood.
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 6 of 18
The project site is located within an established commercial corridor within the City.
The applicant has provided an aesthetically complementary design, which consists
of a modern design, muted modern colors, and various site improvements. The
proposed commercial fagade renovation would improve the overall aesthesis of
the surrounding neighborhood and be complementary to the existing
developments in the vicinity.
B. The plan for the proposed structure and site development indicates the manner in
which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected against
noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the
environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage
and loading areas.
The proposed project consists of renovating the primary facade (Valley Blvd.
frontage) of the existing commercial shopping center and various site
improvements, and would not modify the use and site configuration. As such, the
proposed project would not produce any foreseeable adverse impacts. All
construction work would be required to comply with the timeframe and decibel
levels indicated in the City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance. Conditions of Approval
will address factors such as construction hours, noise, landscaping, screening of
mechanical equipment, trash, storage and loading areas.
C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and
appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site
developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment
to materially depreciate in appearance and value.
The renovation of the primary facade (Valley Blvd. frontage) of the existing
commercial shopping center and various site improvements would not depreciate
the appearance and value of the local environment. Staff has worked closely with
the applicant to achieve a modern design that would complement the
neighborhood character. The modern design incorporates recommendations
found in the Downtown Rosemead Design Guidelines and the proposed
commercial fagade has been designed to create visual interest at the street level
and complement the surrounding neighborhood.
D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed developments
on land in the general area, especially those instances where buildings are within
or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center or
in public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land included
within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style.
The project site is located south of Muscatel Middle School, which is designated
as Public Facilities in the General Plan and is not a part of the Civic Center. The
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 7 of 18
proposed project consists of renovating the primary facade (Valley Blvd. frontage)
of the existing commercial shopping center and various site improvements, and
would not modify the use and site configuration. The applicant's proposal to utilize
contrasting exterior finishes, high quality materials, and a modern, muted color
scheme would create an aesthetically high-quality project would be in harmony
with the developments in land designated on the General Plan as Public Facilities,
the Civic Center, and developments the vicinity of the project site.
E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this Code and
other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the
buildings and structures are involved.
The proposed project consists of renovating the primary facade (Valley Blvd.
frontage) of the existing commercial shopping center and various site
improvements, and would not modify the use and site configuration. The proposed
exterior fagade design of the existing building would complement the existing
commercial site developments within the vicinity of the project site. As such, the
proposed project would be in conformity with the standards of the Zoning Code
and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the
buildings and structures are involved.
F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping,
luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been
given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile
and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view
of public streets.
The proposed project consists of renovating the primary facade (Valley Blvd.
frontage) of the existing commercial shopping center and various site
improvements, and would not modify the use and site configuration. The site plan
and design of the parking areas, signs, landscaping, and other site features would
not be affected by the proposed project as the various site improvements only aim
to rehabilitate the existing structures, parking areas, and landscaping. A condition
of approval has been added to ensure that all exterior lighting shall be fully shielded
and directed downwards as to not project over the property lines of the subject
site. The proposed design of the exterior fagade of the existing building and various
site improvements would produce a visually pleasing effect of the development
from the view of public streets.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process, which
includes a 300 -foot radius public hearing notice to forty seven (47) property owners,
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 8 of 18
publication in the Rosemead Reader on November 22, 2018, and postings of the notice
at the six (6) public locations and on the subject site.
Prepared by:
o�-
Annie Lao
Assistant Planner
Submitted by:
Ben
of Community Development
Reviewed
Aiela
Planning & Economic
EXHIBITS:
A. Planning Commission Resolution 18-17
B. Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations (Dated November 15, 2018)
C. Assessor Parcel Map (APN: 5391-009-001 and 5391-009-003)
Development Manager
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 9 of 18
EXHIBIT "A"
PC RESOLUTION 18-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 18-03, PERMITTING THE
IMPROVEMENT OF THE PRIMARY FACADE (VALLEY BLVD.
FRONTAGE) OF AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER, IN
ADDITION TO SITE VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS THE
REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING PARKING LOT, LANDSCAPING,
SHOPPING CART CONTAINMENT STATIONS, LOCKSMITH
STRUCTURE, AND AN UPGRADED TRASH ENCLOSURE, LOCATED
AT 8801-8845 VALLEY BOULEVARD (APN: 5391-009-001 and 5391-
009-003), IN A CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH
RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AND
DESIGN OVERLAYS (CBD/RC-MUDO/D-O) ZONE.
WHEREAS, on August 2, 2018, 420 Boyd Street LLC submitted a Design Review
application to renovate the primary facade (Valley Blvd. frontage) of an existing
commercial shopping center in addition to various site improvements such as the
rehabilitation of the existing parking lot, landscaping, shopping cart containment stations,
locksmith structure, and an upgraded trash enclosure at 8801-8845 Valley Boulevard;
WHEREAS, 8801-8845 Valley Boulevard is located in a Central Business District
with Residential/Commercial Mixed-use Development and Design Overlays (CBD/RC-
MUDO/D-O) zone;
WHEREAS, Section 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code provides the
criteria for a Design Review;
WHEREAS, Sections 65800 & 65900 of the California Government Code and
Section 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning
Commission to approve, conditionally approve, or deny Design Review applications;
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2018, forty seven (47) notices were sent to property
owners within a 300 -foot radius from the subject property, the notice was published in the
Rosemead Reader, and notices were posted in six (6) public locations and on site,
specifying the availability of the application, and the date, time, and location of the public
hearing for Design Review 18-03;
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2018, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Design
Review 18-03; and
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Palle 10 of 18
WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all
testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rosemead as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Design
Review 18-03 is classified as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Section 15301
of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines. Section 15301 of the California
Environmental Quality Act guidelines exempts projects consisting of the operation, repair,
maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private
structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving
negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's
determination.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that
facts do exist to justify approving Design Review 18-03, in accordance with Section
17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows:
A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the
proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general
neighborhood.
FINDING: The project site is located within an established commercial corridor
within the City. The applicant has provided an aesthetically complementary design, which
consists of a modern design, muted modern colors, and various site improvements. The
proposed commercial fapade renovation would improve the overall aesthesis of the
surrounding neighborhood and be complementary to the existing developments in the
vicinity.
B. The plan for the proposed structure and site development indicates the manner
in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected against
noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the environment,
and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage and loading areas.
FINDING: The proposed project consists of renovating the primary facade (Valley
Blvd. frontage) of the existing commercial shopping center and various site
improvements, and would not modify the use and site configuration. As such, the
proposed project would not produce any foreseeable adverse impacts. All construction
work would be required to comply with the timeframe and decibel levels indicated in the
City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance. Conditions of Approval will address factors such as
construction hours, noise, landscaping, screening of mechanical equipment, trash,
storage and loading areas.
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 11 of 18
C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and
appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site
developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to
materially depreciate in appearance and value.
FINDING: The renovation of the primary facade (Valley Blvd. frontage) of the
existing commercial shopping center and various site improvements would not depreciate
the appearance and value of the local environment. Staff has worked closely with the
applicant to achieve a modern design that would complement the neighborhood
character. The modern design incorporates recommendations found in the Downtown
Rosemead Design Guidelines and the proposed commercial fagade has been designed
to create visual interest at the street level and complement the surrounding neighborhood.
D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed
developments on land in the general area, especially those instances where buildings are
within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center or
in public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land included within
any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style.
FINDING: The project site is located south of Muscatel Middle School, which is
designated as Public Facilities in the General Plan and is not a part of the Civic Center.
The proposed project consists of renovating the primary facade (Valley Blvd. frontage) of
the existing commercial shopping center and various site improvements, and would not
modify the use and site configuration. The applicant's proposal to utilize contrasting
exterior finishes, high quality materials, and a modern, muted color scheme would create
an aesthetically high-quality project would be in harmony with the developments in land
designated on the General Plan as Public Facilities, the Civic Center, and developments
the vicinity of the project site.
E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this Code and
other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and
structures are involved.
FINDING: The proposed project consists of renovating the primary facade (Valley
Blvd. frontage) of the existing commercial shopping center and various site
improvements, and would not modify the use and site configuration. The proposed
exterior fagade design of the existing building would complement the existing commercial
site developments within the vicinity of the project site. As such, the proposed project
would be in conformity with the standards of the Zoning Code and other applicable
ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are
involved.
F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping,
luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been given to
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 12 of 18
both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian
circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of public streets.
FINDING: The proposed project consists of renovating the primary facade (Valley
Blvd. frontage) of the existing commercial shopping center and various site
improvements, and would not modify the use and site configuration. The site plan and
design of the parking areas, signs, landscaping, and other site features would not be
affected by the proposed project as the various site improvements only aim to rehabilitate
the existing structures, parking areas, and landscaping. A condition of approval has been
added to ensure that all exterior lighting shall be fully shielded and directed downwards
as to not project over the property lines of the subject site. The proposed design of the
exterior fagade of the existing building and various site improvements would produce a
visually pleasing effect of the development from the view of public streets.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Design Review 18-
03 for the improvement of the exterior fagade of an existing commercial shopping center
located at 8801-8845 Valley Boulevard, and subject to the conditions listed in Attachment
"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 4. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days after this
decision by the Planning Commission, unless within such time a written appeal is filed
with the City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in
Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.160.040 — Appeals of Decisions.
SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning
Commission on December 3, 2018, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
SECTION 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall
transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of December, 2018.
John Tang, Chair
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 13 of 18
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 31 day of
December, 2018, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Ben Kim, Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kane Thuyen, Planning Commission Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
Planning Commission Meeting
December3,2018
Page 14 of 18
ATTACHMENT"A"
DESIGN REVIEW 18-03
8801-8845 VALLEY BOULEVARD
(APN: 5391-009-001 and 5391-009-003)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DECEMBER 3, 2018
Standard Conditions of Approvals
Design Review 18-03 ("Project') is approved for exterior fagade improvements to
an existing commercial shopping center, located at 8801-8845 Valley Boulevard,
in accordance with the plans marked Exhibit "B", dated November 15, 2018. Any
revisions to the approved plans must be resubmitted for Planning Division review
and, if satisfactory, approval.
2. The following conditions must be complied to the satisfaction of the Planning
Division prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits, occupancy
permits, or any other appropriate request.
The conditions of approval listed on this exhibit shall be copied directly onto any
development plans submitted to the Planning and Building Divisions. The applicant
shall ensure that all conditions of approval have been met and are in full force prior
to the issuance of a building permit or Certificate of Occupancy as determined by
the Director of Community Development.
4. Approval of Project shall not take effect for any purpose until the applicant(s) have
filed with the City of Rosemead ("City") a notarized affidavit stating that he/she is
aware of and accepts all of the conditions of approval as set forth in the letter of
approval and this list of conditions within ten (10) days from the Planning
Commission approval date.
5. The on-site public hearing notice posting shall be removed by the end of the 10 -
day appeal period of Project.
Project is approved for a period of one (1) year. The applicant(s) shall commence
the approved project or request an extension within 30 calendar days prior to
expiration. The one (1) year initial approval period shall be effective from the
Planning Commission approval date. For the purpose of this petition, project
commencement shall be defined as beginning the permitting process with the
Planning and Building Divisions, so long as the project is not abandoned. If Project
has been unused, abandoned, or discontinued for a period of one (1) year, it shall
become null and void.
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 15 of 18
7. The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make and/or
approve minor modifications to the project and to these conditions of approval.
8. Project is granted or approved with the City and its Planning Commission and City
Council retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify
the permit, including the conditions of approval based on changed circumstances.
Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of the use,
a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the use, or the expansion,
alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use. This reservation of right to review is
in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, and
City Council to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved under
the Rosemead Municipal Code for any violations of the conditions imposed on
Project.
9. The applicant(s) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rosemead
or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against
the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set side, void,
or annul, an approval of the Planning Commission and/or City Council concerning
the project, which action is brought within the time period provided by law.
10. The applicant(s) shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws relative to the
approved use, including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff,
and Health Departments.
11. Building permits will not be issued in connection with any project until such time as
all plan check fees and all other applicable fees are paid in full. Prior to issuance
of building permits, any required school fees shall be paid. The applicant shall
provide the City with written verification of compliance from the applicable school
districts.
12. The numbers of the address signs shall be at least six (6) inches tall with a
minimum character width of 3/4 inch, contrasting in color and easily visible at
driver's level from the street. Materials, colors, location, and size of such address
numbers shall be approved by the Community Development Director, or his/her
designee, prior to installation.
13. The hours of construction shall be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday
through Saturday. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any federal
holiday, without prior approval by the City. The applicant shall abide by the noise
control sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code.
14. The Building Division, Planning Division, and Engineering Division shall have
access to the project site at any time during construction to monitor progress.
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 16 of 18
15. All requirements of the Building and Safety Division, Planning Division, and
Engineering Division shall be complied with prior to the final approval of the
proposed construction.
16. All ground level mechanical/utility equipment (including meters, back flow
prevention devices, fire valves, A/C condensers, furnaces, and other equipment)
shall be located away from public view or adequately screened by landscaping or
screening walls so as not to be seen from the public right-of-way.
17. All new and existing roof -top appurtenances and equipment shall be adequately
screened from view to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. Such equipment
shall not exceed the height of the parapet wall. There shall be no mechanical
equipment located on the sides of the building.
18. Violations of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of
revocation proceedings.
19. Subject to Building Division regulations, if required, a grading and/or drainage plan
shall be prepared, submitted to, and approved by the Building Official, and such
grading and/or drainage shall take place in accordance with such approved plan.
The project site shall be graded to drain to the street, but in no case shall such
drainage be allowed to sheet flow across public sidewalk.
20. If applicable, the applicant(s) shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to
the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and
irrigation plan shall comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
and with the Guidelines for Implementation of the Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance and include a sprinkler system with automatic timers and moisture
sensors. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed and completed prior to
final Planning Division approval.
Project Specific Conditions of Approval
21. Any exterior lighting shall be fully shielded and directed downwards as to not
project over the property lines of the subject site.
22. A revised master sign program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for
review and, if satisfactory, approval.
23. Planning Division approval of sign plans must be obtained prior to obtaining
building permits and/or installation for any signs.
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 17 of 18
24. The site shall be maintained in a graffiti -free state. Any graffiti shall be removed
within twenty-four (24) hours.
25. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed and litter free state.
26. All trash containers and the trash compactor for the entire shopping center shall
be located within a trash enclosure pursuant to Rosemead Municipal Section
17.32.050 of the Zoning Code and per approval by the Planning Division.
27. The existing trash enclosure shall be improved with a solid roof cover and self-
closing doors and shall be re -painted to complement the proposed commercial
fagade.
28. Parking area(s) shall be maintained free from conspicuous cracks or holes. All
parking striping shall be maintained in a clear, visible, and orderly manner to the
satisfaction of the Planning Division.
29. All open areas not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be landscaped
and maintained on a regular basis to the satisfaction of the Planning Division.
30. The main shopping cart containment station shall be improved with an opaque
stucco wall to screen the shopping carts and all shopping cart containment stations
located in the parking lot shall be re -painted to complement the proposed
commercial fagade.
31. The existing locksmith structure located near the south property line shall be re -
roofed and the body of the structure shall be repainted to complement the
proposed commercial fagade renovation.
32. Decorative large potted plants shall be incorporated throughout the proposed
fagade improvement as indicated on the plans of the commercial shopping center.
Planning Commission Meeting
December 3, 2018
Page 18 of 18
EXHIBIT "C"
5391 9 i 2001
scnr- r =.loo•
Vt
WIAR —a —
1
126:
�a
12 13 ta'
F IS -m
Ifi
10
17E c w�'�n spout
19 Q .6
2oQa
Ka 421 22 23
J 6
p 1P
AVE
' !/ —1 V•a MUSCATEL AVE. „
4 �- O O �I1628
p�
W9i 8216^-�
IzO12626
12630 SUBJECT
R SEMEA M. 6.12-194-195 SITE
Mk F86d. ass6Tse: TRACT IJP. 4771 M.B. 97-I-2
L Of
BiC
5390
FEB 6V 2091 1