Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CC - Item 4K - Traffic Commissions Recommendation to Partially Close Olney Street Between Rio Hondo and Temple City Boulevard
isM 9 I ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL 4). i CIVIC PRIDE b kms, P /NCORPORATED 12'59 STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GLORIA MOLLEDA, CITY MANAGER M , DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2019 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL TO PARTIALLY CLOSE OLNEY STREET BETWEEN RIO HONDO AVENUE AND TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD SUMMARY Traffic issues on Olney Street came before the Traffic Commission previously on October 7, 2017, September 6, 2018 and October 4, 2018. The City Council heard the topic on December 11, 2018. The City Council directed staff to solicit proposals to perform a traffic study in the vicinity of Olney Street, Temple City Boulevard and Rio Hondo Avenue. That traffic study, conducted by the selected Traffic Engineer Elie Farah of EFI, was presented to the Traffic Commission on November 7, 2019. During the presentation to the Traffic Commission on November 7, 2019, Elie Farah gave a thorough presentation of the traffic study report (Attachment A) and walked the Commission through the data and explained how the raw data and statistics translates into information which the Commission can make informed decisions upon. After the presentation, numerous questions from the Traffic Commission were asked of Mr. Farah. There were several options presented to the Traffic Commission including short term fixes which included additional signage and striping as a mean to slow down traffic and long- term options which included up to a complete closure of Olney Street from Temple City Avenue. After the discussion, the Traffic Commission voted 4-0 to recommend to the City Council a partial permanent shut down of Olney Street, and short-term mitigating measures to help ease speeding on Olney Street. For this to occur, the City Council will need to approve a budget to prepare preliminary design plans and estimate for the partial street closure of Olney Street at Temple City Blvd. The plans will include preliminary street improvements and striping plans as well as preliminary cost estimate for partial closure. AGENDA ITEM 4.K City Council Meeting December 10,2019 Page 2 of 3 DISCUSSION During the presentation to the Traffic Commission, several issues were discussed about the unique traffic situation on Olney Street. Because the freeway onramp on Temple City Ave. often backs up during peak morning and evening hours, many drivers simply turn right on Olney Street and head West on Olney Street to turn left on Rio Hondo to get on the freeway- hoping to beat the backed-up traffic on Temple City Avenue. Additionally,many drivers utilize Olney Street to turn right onto Temple City Avenue and then make a U-turn to turn right back on to the freeway. And because of the easy access to the freeway, there's concern from the Olney Street residents about their area being ripe for crime as criminals can burglar a home on Olney and quickly slip away on the I-10 freeway. As with any complex issue such as this issue on Olney Street, each solution also creates additional issues. An example would be that a full closure or even partial closure of Olney Street will create more traffic backup on Temple City Boulevard and some arterials. Depending upon the time of day, the potential impacts of each possible remedy were discussed. Additionally, it is understood that once Caltrans allows the partial closure that the decision is considered permanent. After careful consideration, the Traffic Commission decided that a partial closure of Olney Street was the best solution. Significantly contributing to the decision of a partial closure are several houses on the west side of Temple City Boulevard where, if a full closure were imposed on Olney Street,their only option to leave their house would be a forced entrance onto Interstate 10. A partial closure of Olney Street (if a future study determines it is possible depending on the width of Temple City Avenue) would enable the residents to continue to turn right onto Onley and or enter the I-10 Freeway as they presently do. Additionally, the Traffic Commission recommended that the City Council allow "quick fixes" such as additional speed limit signs, painting of side lines designed to slow traffic coupled with specific enforcement of Olney Street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION J The Traffic.Commission has recommended to the City Council to allow a partial permanent closure of Olney Street in addition to the above "quick fixes" described above. In order to determine if,Olney Street partial closure is a viable solution, preliminary design plans and estimates will need to be prepared to determine the feasibility and costs of partial closure. Based on the preliminary design and estimates, the City Council can make an informed decision on the issue. J City Council Meeting December 10,2019 Page 3 of 3 FISCAL IMPACT The cost of preliminary design plans, estimates, and recommendations will be approximately $10,000.00. Funds are available in account number 101-3035-5299. STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT Strategy three of the City of Rosemead's Strategic Plan is Beautification and Infrastructure. By hiring an Engineering Firm to perform all engineering functions, the City Council's vision of the City of Rosemead, which includes an.aggressive Capital Improvement Program, will be closer to being implemented and fulfilled. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Prep • : Chr aste Director of Public Works Attachment A: Traffic Study Attachment B:November 7,2019—Traffic Commission Draft Minutes 7 7,,,,, O civic PRIDE fff igniv 5‘,F,,,,,„..._.., ...._, P 'NCORPORATEDA° Attachment A Traffic Commission Staff Report Dated November 7, 2019 E M 5 4 ° ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION civic PRIDG STAFF REPORT krit-e," 411CoRpo5, SiV TO: TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CHRIS DASTE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2019 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF TRAFFIC STUDY FOR OLNEY STREET BETWEEN RIO HONDO AVENUE AND TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD SUMMARY Traffic issues on Olney Street has come before the Traffic Commission previously on October 7, 2017, September 6, 2018 and October 4, 2018. The City Council heard the topic on December 11, 2018. The City Council directed staff to solicit proposals to perform a traffic study in the vicinity of Olney Street, Temple City Boulevard and Rio Hondo Avenue. Elie Farah of EFI was hired by the City of Rosemead and conducted an extensive traffic study of the impacted areas. The traffic study includes a summary of findings and advantages and disadvantages of all potential actions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Traffic Commission: 1. Discuss Item 2. Provide recommendations to the City Council ANALYSIS As directed by City Council, staff performed a detailed, comprehensive traffic study of Olney Street, Temple City Boulevard and Rio Hondo Avenue. Staff will be providing a presentation for the Traffic Commission. COURTESY NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process, and 214 notices were sent out to surrounding residences within an estimated 800 foot radius Traffic Commission Meeting November 7,2019 Page 2 of 5 Prepared By: Chris Daste Director of Public Works Attachments: 1. Traffic Analysis Prepared by Eli Farah of Elie Farah Inc. 2. Courtesy Notice c Traffic Commission Meeting November 7,2019 Page 3 of 5 ATTACHMENT 1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TO: Ms.Gloria Molleda,City Manager FROM: Elie Farah,EFI DATE: 7-10-2019 SUBJECT: Traffic analysis for Olney St between Rio Hondo Avenue and Temple City Boulevard in the City of Rosemead, CA. On behalf of the City of Rosemead,EFI has completed a traffic analysis to evaluate a request for traffic calming measures on Olney St between Rio Hondo Avenue and Temple City Boulevard. This segment of roadway is comprised of residential use. A vicinity Map is included below. The segment is stop controlled at Rio Hondo Ave, Vane St, and Temple City Blvd. Residents have complained that pass thru vehicles are traveling at high speeds and use this segment to access the West Bound on Ramp to the I-10 Freeway on Temple City Blvd. .a-s i "''',..--1 '- - �' L ice`, r , � -1. .*I= Wit+- -=--�=� - i , . --'r- i w~ - a i . „';,,,,t' 4- L _ ,ii 0 fir- a 1♦. 'P. rte • `,l 4 ...`► 3 ' ;J. 1' `14 r e L � . ' r" t II 41 1-41114•1 - 4 r r., . Pt- ..,, : 1 s- A t'.% ,...i..14.41,._ 1.•*4 t ft 4. �,¢/ �.r r 7 'L1 it ` s: LCI , L t -1 !t 4 - ': . = f . . � " �` tII ;. r _ 1 _ . . "4"•... ... E. , It y K ' -"4 } ,, • • 1 ,.,...ALIT I . W IS - - f '' L 1 t ll tir : is- LI' L. , 1,i` 6 r AR, i. • , , , . a ,.7 - -. — . =:1-10 rk>r`t.Y . - :: - _ • _,. - 1 FIGURE 1 11 Page , Background Since October of last year, the Traffic Commission has met three times (October 7, 2017; September 6, 2018; and October 4, 2018) to discuss the traffic conditions on Olney Street between Rio Hondo Avenue and Temple City Boulevard In response to various traffic concerns raised by residents,staff has proposed incremental measures that include enhanced traffic signage and pavement markings to address many of those concerns. However, many residents have expressed a greater preference, ifpossible, to close the east end of Olney Street at Temple City Boulevard and eliminate the on-ramp to the westbound I-10 Freeway as well as access to Olney Street from southbound Temple City Boulevard. Therefore, it has become clear, that a comprehensive traffic study is necessary to review all of the traffic movements impacting Olney Street, and explore the feasibility of closing the east end of Olney Street. However, since then, residents have expressed additional concerns at the September 6, 2018 and October 4, 2018 Traffic Commission meetings that included the following: • There has been an increase in robberies in the area due to the proximity of the I-10 Freeway on- ramp;many robberies occur in the daytime. • There has been a significant increase in traffic volumes on Olney Street. • Many cars are traveling at excessive speeds on Olney Street, and there have been many accidents; speed humps or additional stop signs are needed to slow down the vehicles. • Eastbound cars are continuing to make U-turns on Olney Street between Ellis Lane and Temple City Boulevard • Vehicles headed southbound on Temple City sometimes get trapped in the far right lane,forcing them to make a right turn onto Olney Street, then making a U-turn on Olney to get onto the freeway. • Those making U-turns on Olney Street often drive up onto the resident's driveways, and it can be difficult to back out of the driveways during rush hour. •• Vehicles are bypassing the southbound traffic on Temple City Boulevard by cutting through on Ellis Lane and Olney Street to get to the freeway. • Since there is no sidewalk on Olney Street, kids walk in the streets on the way to Savannah School; kids can't play in the street due to all the cars; it's not safe. In order to mitigate some of these concerns, staff has proposed various incremental measures such as installing "No U-turn"signs, "25 mph Speed Limit"signs, and additional "Stop"signs on Olney Street at the intersections ofMarybeth Avenue and Ellis Lane.However, the overwhelming preference expressed by residents at.the October 4, 2018 Traffic Commission meeting is to close the east end of Olney Street. • None of these measures appear to have been implemented. ACCIDENT DATA • Accident Data Collection and Tabulation was done for the area bounded by Marshall St to the - north and Temple City Blvd to the east and Rio Hondo to the west and Olney to the South. See the Study Limit exhibit Below. 2 I pa ge • .!..a- I 6.'1 7'4nisi ° _ " ' , ; b► , kill ...��.r.I AD NA ST (a. s .Jr •,�' I ; - i—tie rio3t_rif.c.i. 9i id:lr-4,,II 1 --f .0, tic- - ,-- , — it , _ . .. ._..„,ii..-ii ... .1 , . 1 t , ' i - - '-1'4-7 11---;:ili It 117-74Hrl :17:.''.---''-LI• -..;"16.' '''''.: 1 -' r,,,"-- 1-1:1 :::-) { ,, ? ,..j '' . ur:A l „y4 .__1 11W, �. gibes :::-,�.lbt i c.,. ' ��" ,� - • 1'Q`*. , Thr -: L � ,- . i.. ' r.�.' jtt Arrow 1 z. .41 41 41 i.;: 1 -Vs'. :...„ :tea i—.' , - •, r--.i.. wig y ,i, 3 !.'.. s w". +., a_ .r 111 ji -� it F K Ig( °.; I' 1.• r' ' I ? ,.�. 1,,, j—ri A •• '` � t tt r , ' 'k_ !. 1 5 fit: r ' sr ' 1 ,bi'Jt 1.,,i, i A. i'. tedliv... !;.' s - , .. N. , - . w �� dimmak. -a. - .. ..-}�.i --At I__ MONOMMINOMMeht_ r.u.iuRE 2 STUDY LIMITS The accident investigation was conducted within the last 3.5 years (2016, 2017, 2018, and part of 2019) from SWITRS (Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System) records for the City of Rosemead and the Sheriff's Department for the study Area. The accidents were tabulated in Table 1 below. FABLE ACCIDENT SUMMARY Year 2019 _ Intersecting Street Name Date Type Collision on Distance ELLIS LANE MARSHALL ST 3/25/2019 SIDESWIPE ELLIS LANE 200'5 RIO HONDO AVE DE ADELANA ST 2/6/2019 SIDESWIPE DE ADELANA ST 31'E TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 4/23/2019 BROADSIDE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 0' 31Page ACCIDENT SUMMARY Year 2019 TEMPLE CITY BLVD OLNEY ST 3/22/2019 HIT OBJECT TEMPLE CITY BLVD 11' N _ Year 2018 Intersecting Street Name Date Type Collision on Distance TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 11/6/2018 SIDESWIPE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 0' TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 11/6/2018 SIDESWIPE MARSHALL ST 48'W TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 2/4/2018 SIDESWIPE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 63'S TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 2/7/2018 BROADSIDE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 0' TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 2/8/2018 BROADSIDE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 0' TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 2/13/2018 BROADSIDE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 0' TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 5/24/2018 BROADSIDE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 262'N TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 11/21/2018 BROADSIDE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 0' OLNEY ST ELLLIS LANE 7/10/2018 REAR END OLNEY ST 83'W OLNEYST MARYBETH AVE 8/19/2018 HEAD-ON OLNEYST 0' RIO HONDO AVE OLNEY ST 4/17/2018 BROADSIDE RIO HONDO AVE 4'S Year 2017 Intersecting Street Name Date Type Collision on Distance_ ELLIS LANE DE ADELANA ST 8/8/2017 BACKING UP DE ADELANA ST 296'W TEMPLE CITY BLVD OLNEY ST 10/7/2017 HIT OBJECT OLNEY ST 5'W OLNEY ST VANE AVE 6/4/2017 REAR END OLNEY ST 123' E RIO HONDO AVE MARSHALL ST 12/31/2017 BROADSIDE RIO HONDO AVE 23' N TEMPLE CITY BLVD GUESS ST 6/15/2017 BROADSIDE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 35'S TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 5/21/2017 SIDESWIPE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 225'N TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 7/6/2017 REAR END TEMPLE CITY BLVD 210'S TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 10/11/2017 SIDESWIPE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 447'N TEMPLE CITY BLVD OLNEY ST 5/2/2017 SIDESWIPE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 51' N Year 2016 Intersecting Street Name Date Accident Type Collision on Distance ELLIS LANE DE ADELANA ST 12/8/2016 BACKING UP ON ELLIS 159'S RIO HONDO AVE GLENDON WAY 1/31/2016 SIDESWIPE RIO HONDO AVE 132' N RIO HONDO AVE GLENDON WAY 5/18/2016 SIDESWIPE RIO HONDO AVE 267' N RIO HONDO AVE MARSHALL ST 2/25/2016 REAR END RIO HONDO AVE 165' N TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 4/28/2016 STARTING/BACKING UP TEMPLE CITY BLVD 40' N TEMPLE CITY BLVD MARSHALL ST 8/28/2016 SIDESWIPE TEMPLE CITY BLVD 84' N TEMPLE CITY BLVD OLNEY ST 10/30/2016 IMPROPER TURN TEMPLE CITY BLVD 113' N ACCIDENT RATE ANALYSIS The accident data for each street segment was compared to accident rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways of the same characteristics. These anticipated accident rates have been developed by Caltrans and are applicable for use in the City of Rosemead. The number of midblock accidents in a street segment are considered as a whole regardless of which direction the accident occurred Since only in extreme cases would a separate speed limit be posted for each direction of travel. The accident rates used for this study are as follows: 41 Page CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAYS STATEWIDE TRAVEL AND ACCIDENT RATES* URBAN (Inside City) EXPECTED ACCIDENT RATES 2 and 3 lane 1.37 4 or more undivided 1.85 *Source: 2012 Travel and Accident summary Statewide- Urban(inside City). Compiled from the 2012 Collision Data on California State Highways. Current accident rates are shown in terms of"accidents per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel"for each road segment. The rate was calculated for each road segment using the following formula: Accident Rate=(N x 5,280 x a,000,000)/(ADT x Lx Y x 365) N: number of midblock accidents within the study segment ADT: average daily traffic volume L: length of segment in feet Y: number of years of accident history • TABLE 2 ACCIDENT RATE Street Name Accident Rate Expected Accident Rate De Adalena St 3.84 1.37 Ellis Lane 4.73 1.37 Marshall St 4.19 1.37 Olney St 4.91 1.37 Rio Hondo Ave 5.79 1.37 Temple City Blvd 1.84 1.85 The accident rates overall are higher than expected when compared to the statewide rates. Olney Street has a higher than expected accident rate. SPEEDING CITATIONS EFI Collected, Reviewed , and Tabulated police records regarding speeding citations. The following is a summary based on information provided by the Sherriff's Department on June 6, 2019. See Appendix for Sheriff's report details. 5IPage The Sherriff's Department issued two citations on Olney Street.Neither one was for speeding. SPEED SURVEY 2012 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY In 2012 as part of the City-wide traffic engineering and traffic survey, four of the six segments were surveyed as shown in table 5 below. TABLE 5 2012 Radar Speed Survey Dir. of 85 %ile Posted Limit Limit per Location Date Travel Speed MPH 85%ile Temple City Blvd- 1 Between Olney St and NB/SB 10/1/2012 43 40 40 Guess St 2 Rio Hondo-Between NB/SB 09/28/2012 28 30 30 Olney St and Marshall St 3 Ellis Lane-Between NB/SB 10/1/2012 26 25 25 Olney St and Marshall St 4 De Adalena-Between EB/WB 09/28/2012 29 25 30* Rio Hondo Ave and Ellis Lane *Speed reduced per CAMUTCD Option 2 to 25 mph 5. Olney St-Between Rio Hondo Ave and Temple City Blvd is considered a residential street with a Prima Facie speed of 25 MPII 6.Marshall St-Between Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd-not posted but speed limit should be 25MPH due to segment length. Segment 5 and 6 were not a part of the 2012 speed survey conducted by the City. It is likely because the segments are considered local/residential The fundamentals used to establish speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, but need to be advised of conditions which may not be readily apparent. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must be analyzed along with speed measurements to determine speed limits. Speed limit 61 Page changes are usually coordinated with visible changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. A Speed survey was conducted from June 7,2019 through June 11,2019 at the following segments to compare to historical speed survey: 1. Temple City Blvd-Between Obey St and Guess St 2. Rio Hondo-Between Olney St and Marshall St 3. Ellis Lane-Between Olney St and Marshall St 4. De Adalena-Between Rio Hondo Ave and Ellis Lane 5. Olney St-Between Rio Hondo Ave and Temple City Blvd 6. Marshall St-Between Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd The Speed Survey Worksheets are included in the appendix. To confirm actual speeds along the six segments, EFI conducted a radar speed survey off peak hours on a typical weekday.Radar speed measurements were conducted June 8,2019 through June 11,2019. Field data was also collected. This included visibility restrictions, roadway conditions, pedestrian activities, on-street parking and land use adjacent to the roadways. The radar measurements followed guidelines and procedures outlined in the CVC 627 and CAMUTCD 2B.13. Speed samples were taken from an unmarked vehicle so as not to alter or impede the free flow of traffic. A total of about 100 samples were obtained for each direction at each segment.50 samples were collected on lower volume street such as Ellis Lane and Olney St. The following table 6 shows the speed survey results. TABLE 6 2019 Radar Speed Survey Dir.of 85%ile Posted Limit Limit per Location Travel . Date Speed MPH 85%ile Temple City Blvd- 1 Between Olney St and NB/SB 06/10/2019 46 40 40* Guess St 2 Rio Hondo-Between NB/SB 06/07/2019 28 30 30 Olney St and Marshall St 3 Ellis Lane-Between NB/SB 06/07/2019 32 25 25* Olney St and Marshall St - -----.._ - 7 ' P a g e TABLE 6 2019 Radar Speed Survey Dir. of 85 %ile Posted Limit Limit per Location Date Travel Speed MPH 85 %ile 4 De Adalena-Between EB/WB 06/11/2019 29 25 30* Rio Hondo Ave and Ellis Lane 5 Olney St-Between Rio EB/WB 06/10/2019 31 25 25* Hondo Ave and Temple City Blvd 6 Marshall St-Between EB/WB 06/11/2019 27 25 25 Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd *Speed reduced per CAMUTCD Option 2 The City can elect to reduce the posted speed limit by 5 mph following CAMUTCD and CVC guidelines. As seen in the Tables,the 2019 speeds are similar to what was found in 2012. If the speed limit was based strictly on 85th% the speed limit along Olney St would be set at 30 mph. However,the CAMUTCD and CVC allow the limit to be reduced by 5 mph based on engineering judgment,accident history and existing roadway land use and conditions. After careful review of existing roadway conditions and operations, EFI has determined that the segment of Olney St-Between Rio Hondo Ave and Temple City Blvd would benefit by the placement/implementation of the following traffic calming measures: Phase 1: 1) Targeted Police Enforcement: The police department should provide periodic spot enforcement during off peak hours when traffic is able to move more freely through the segment. 2) Solid White Striping on Both Sides of the.Roadway: Two solid white lines on each side of Olney St will narrow travel lanes, effectively slowing speeds by changing the travel environment. Narrower lanes cause Drivers to travel at a slower pace. This has shown to be an effective device for reducing travel speeds. 3) Larger Speed Limit Signs and Radar Enforced Plaque: Installation of additional and larger speed limit signs are recommended as treatments to increase the motorist's awareness of 8IPage the posted speed limit. Speed limit signs are one of the most cost effective measures in increasing awareness of motorists traveling through a neighborhood street. Phase 2: Install Radar Feedback Signs Phase 3: Install Speed Cushion(speed humps). This would require the City to implement a speed cushion policy. BURGLARY REPORTS EFI contacted the Sheriff's Department and requested police records regarding crime reports for the area shown below bounded by Marshall St to the north and Temple City Blvd to the east and Rio Hondo to the west and Olney to the South for the past 3 years.The full report with location of the incident is included in the Appendix.The following Table 7 is a summary based on information provided by the Sheriff's Department on June 26,2019: "" De Adelwu Si c 53.N 5 ly Yi ct.trotdlti S0,c,1 't ° O g r o. g G ,in `i6M 'I- 4 u 1 r,: T r .4 1 s• X i jr t '' all• r4 I r JA, 5 -11 f ` §J '1 i deet St ~" SAN SERNARDINO FRWY VD FRWY FIGURE 3 AREA LIMITS 91Page City of Rosemead Part I Crimes within a Boundary (Marshall St/Temple City Blvd/Olney St/Rio Hondo Ave) ,une 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018 • • ! ; 4 s CRIME TYPE BURGLARY•RESIDENTIAL S GRAND THEFT VEHICLE(GTA) I OTHER THEFT 6 THEFT FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FIGURE 4 City of Rosemead Part I Crimes within a Boundary (Marshall St/Temple City Blvd/Olney St/Rio Hondo Ave) June 1,2018 thru May 31, 2019 ! i s • (31 4 9. P CRIME TYPE 6 BURGLARY RESIDENTIAL 2 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE(GTAI r,; 1 OTHER THEFT F1 2 THEFT FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FIGURE 5 10IPage City of Rosemead Part I Crimes within a Boundary (Marshall St/Temple City Blvd/Olney St/Rio Hondo) June 1, 2016 thru May 31, 2017 Q • 9 CRIME TYPE 2 BURGLARY•RESIDENTIAL 1 GRANO THEFT VEHICLE(GTA) 2 THEFT FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FIGURE 6 TABLE 7 Crime Summary Table 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 Homicide 0 0 0 Rape 0 0 0 Robbery 0 0 0 Assault 0 0 0 Burglary 2 3 4 Larceny 2 7 3 GTA 1 5 2 Arson 0 0 0 The report appear to indicate that burglaries continue to rise from 2016 to 2019 while Larceny and Grand theft Auto peaked 2017/2018 11IPage CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC As shown in the observation station location exhibit below,EFI Performed a License Plate Survey on 6/4/2019 and 6/6/2019 to determine the amount of cut-through traffic at the following Five (5) locations: 1. De Adalena Street East of Rio Hondo Avenue 2. Ellis Lane North of Marshall Street 3. Marshall Street West of Temple City Boulevard 4. Olney Street East of Rio Hondo Avenue 5. Olney Street West of Temple City Boulevard In today's connected world, many mobile apps route traffic thru neighborhoods to get cars from point A to point B to avoid congestion on the freeway. _ _ _ tC; `)FAf: :r _' ,� 'ivi i �' r-i, t4 1.o. —/ •_ eller- _ - ,,,,_, p,;,,,i,:r . #.1,r_. 4,, , if L'_-.4.1r#1. :,.._ . 1074 : lip,rU� Ai, i-„, .; ,..."..,c,,;,,.,0 ., .' A.,,.... AIL la i i,. givC ' i�[;`� �, :•• a� . y�,.r �o ' 1Y�t Imo,=•- J 4," 7,, 1„,t, 4.er.. tifir rNe. :, f,.....i-a-,..--.1....1_,),,ig .--f--td,.. " N.-;::1/11 ' Tr, ...,L- ; ,r . . .1,01.:-. ,, , -- - -,_ w..r1 11 - . .11 2- tf.c...-4 '-f- - l& 14-'1a, - ,11-17: 1.•IllikA 1— -- ! -- . ., t AO --115"7-771 -I, Pik , . NC 1._*if:. mt.,. ,c...... .- 1 . ,. -__ ....._, ,., . .2- ir Ie.:, . t • .Y {. • 1. iii ,_ ^ 1'41•■ . li-!,.o N I4! �,.. i 1 -1 f f 'T Y. 1 I nil ipir !,001.:;,1 L 1:-.3. i if I-1 ' . • '''' e itLl, _ "' �: # 1 ' 4- ' "i 1-r_ r'; el'�"t w '.'`' .` . - _ 1 —.. �� __ +`LEGEND - - �-_ • -1-10 FRWI� - _• 1--'--;:-€ - - :- CBSL.H.V ilION OBSERVATION STATIONS LOCATION FIGURE 7 12IPage The license plate survey captures all vehicles entering at one observation station. If the last 3 digits of the plate was captured at an exit observation station, it is assumed that the vehicle did not stop in the neighborhood and was considered as part of the cut-through traffic whether traveling parallel to the freeway or getting on the freeway. EFI targeted these segments to assess cut-through traffic. Due to the size and complexity of the travel patterns in the study area a license plate survey was conducted at five locations to determine the exact percentage of traffic cutting through the residential community to avoid taking the Southbound Temple City Blvd to the I-10 westbound ramp to the Freeway or perhaps avoid using the Freeway altogether. Technicians were deployed to record the last three digits of vehicles license plates in 15 minute increments entering and exiting at strategic locations (as shown in the exhibit above)where commuters might leave the main streets and continue their journey through" the Olney Street neighborhood.This information complements the traffic volume data collected at (5) Five segments and (2) intersections. To capture peak commute conditions the survey was conducted from 7 A.M. — 9 A.M. during the morning and from 4.00 P.M.-6.00 P.M. during the evening. The last three digits of the license plate number and time of day a vehicle passed the recording points were collected. The results of each data collection point were traced from entry to exit point to determine the travel patterns of the vehicles. A detailed summary of the results is presented in the Appendix for each entry and exit point over the AM and PM two-hour period. The following is a brief summary of the results for a typical 15 minute period observed from 8:00 AM to 8:15AM: 13JPage For the De Adalena East of Rio Hondo Station, 53% of cut-through traffic traveling Eastbound exited on Marshall St to Temple City Blvd and to a much lesser extent on Olney St westbound onto Rio Hondo Ave During the AM Peak and the PM Peak. See exhibit below for the 8-8:15 AM time period. It is interesting to note that no vehicles entering De Adalena St continued to enter the Freeway at Olney St instead just crossing to Temple City Blvd. 4$v , ' r-1:4-:-......--__- -,-;:- — __ .7. ' EL --Ikt.' . .# il 1 Vige j I' u, '-.L -n,-,_')/Ii11:14,..re : ar, . •.. .,„., —4#1. ....,_ 0-Fral.i • ' .: , _PI iiviirlitil 11 #P1',IL :EL!' , FilF -.—A 0004--- - ...tt- . -Iiit.-140,-i-,....14..,:l.---- -1-7- . 4 icifri-vi ‘ , ,.ii... _ .„„ c „ rill"... IA* ii . , _:-.. A . ...ma I ...A- - • ' ,-‘..----,,..---.. A . a . .- , i.... _ ,mow}: fes- • - 1 t ' +,.11i211 l �-1 l A7s Iiiiiii ,�!f� gam' f �: AN � .a rill '; i 106 , { , i y. ' 1a cjilt :flyy . 3R a 4-,d, ,. 1 l rune :y _ LEGEND . inn,--- la; v • -Ilk; "I lir; , , „41,. .. .1:allt r_. b ..:- j-?, . a_,.• -_ a. ',..?:, ' _,:zr: _4.. ii: . t44 . ,, I:— - .-. —,.,.... .1,43 . . _ , 1 _ .�__ 8:00-8:15 AM Fi .latij.., -- _ - • '1-10 ti - ' OE AOrtiLENA STATION EB _ __ +rrrru�.rta- - CUT-TNROUGHTRAFFIC De Adalena Station EB FIGURE 8 14IPage For the Ellis Lane North of Marshall Street Station,38%of the Cars traveling Southbound exited on Marshall St to Temple City Blvd, 10%traveled on Olney St westbound onto Rio Hondo Ave, and 3%traveled on Olney St eastbound onto the I-10 westbound ramp During the AM . - r,,, ' , i .. ) ','fes-1" _'_ 'i' i 'wrI _ i If, Ara ► .' 1 •• • _ L a t PT l� r �. Y'_ �, 'r*"-0%.4,,,,,,, , ` if P� l7.lit. • + 1 1 _� �• PiSt____a( ` to '` ` ; • , JO !HAI 111 t ,t£ M. ilt r • tL- 1f _ t I P I. ,'` X e `fit '' PAP, l J .. -, r- ---:: iii,....t' rj-. ; ''' - - ' '"'' ',I.-- :11'H,l'...1kiit' I ....t. ,'"-A f-ki-4 e _ te •*' ll :.. • 6 ` sr r - _� "1 ' -,,k-i-'''-'-'- ., i .� ■ i •1 ,_i '' -:.t i- r .,-. + J P --c.. -tem F ii i Ill ,J i 4 , `�. .i~ r . '. 4 i I t.4- •. •. 1 -4,r - • ,r is .z - ,PI _ . 0.r: r t 1 it . '' " - + = a - E r 7-4,..._-_,, -_ r - - = --- _- • rt1"-iP-IROUGP TRS:Mc Ellis Lane Station EB FIGURE 9 15IPage For the Marshall St West of Temple City Blvd Station, 19%of the Cars traveling westbound exited on De Adalena WB E/O Rio Hondo Blvd,14%on Olney St westbound onto Rio Hondo Ave,and 19% traveled on Olney St eastbound onto the I-10 westbound ramp. This is an indication that vehicles are trying to avoid the queues on Temple City Blvd by traveling on Ellis Lane to Olney St to get onto the Freeway. .-.4_41_ tit 1 .110-1.--7 :11111 "-11991: 14-1r:'.:7--r'.?I'LL-----j 7rliar,—-7::::-3' , — 1 4' .--„ t. - ----------t-r- , ,, -L -1-2 It 41 . ,it.:. Art'..tect Tr-- 4 i.. ' ' V_- _, i . ...edif: , .. . 'tr.. 1.,:-:*ki_..-Irir,-.--wo.:1:1:1-_;.,,ff.::.4217:::4----:'41L-lc l'1.1/4.ii..-4111711114"1. A-SL:1 :::: ' ,l':11:"115;-illii_ ot...,,, 14 -: ti,ilar;310i3r 1 --- -* - , g m....10D, t io ' • ,„ .,, • , , ...„,, ,c.,.. 1 , . ...- Is 4° . 1.144 ri--i I Mei '.act 8,..-w—•'- �' ay. ® .to k e 1 ,b 4irt - ir r' w"4.i " .., .1. ._■ ..L�L`'d•� 141�J .� 1.a1o.7 I .y . I - ,.�1,4 '' 9�ii! t- } f,' .�, ,1r , .-S...,..—.s--4.11 ® f- ,' _, •: 5..., P-.. 1111..— jr._ 'IL raw...* ill -2. :' -4._Zw:ii ICI •,1 )0' ' i:. i *Oh -7,'Tilt ' ci; 'r AR I ro 4i. •_ . ,.., ,1,,A, _..• _i • _ , _' ,...,,i .- MI .., , .-. __ s.- _—LEGEND S:OG8:15AM =' _ _ MARSHALL ST STATION r' J. CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC r Marshall St Station EB FIGURE 10 16IPage For the Olney St East of Rio Hondo Ave Station, 17%of the Cars traveling Eastbound exited on Marshall St to Temple City Blvd During the AM Peak.This can be an indication that vehicles are not traveling on Olney St between Rio HondoAve and Temple City Blvd to get onto the Freeway. They could be traveling easterly on Marshall St to Loftus to go to the Eastbound I-10 Ramp. fit- 41-7_7:- , .L —T. '` I 2 '- R-':.+ -2-- it ' L iv/ -1 1 ., c." . - " ",.1 r- , ' •'1...„ I 1 - -- F,,,,,'-‘r.a ,..:,-, 1-. P: -; p.....rzr.ILO_.r.l.,., _4x1 iirs l'i - A , ier L t ii,10!--. -i.41 „ 7 Fr - 1 --ikk 1 ,-s 411 — ?''s big' )4, i , ' 1; fi V*I- Ai if 4.,,o.Ll' _ - -- 11 I I ' -r „ "IF Ir. ,- . i el ____.tiA__ -• ' ' 4L 1 ' SAU -ir-ff'....7, _ILL_ il,lk,_:4,....:-.1 ,1 1.„,4110. .1.320„7 1_ 11;. i i ,..."r"17 L2 II .--1 I WI .,, r Alriirr". - ---,I,' - -- ' r , _ ` }� I �# i - ` .�: iii.>r,�i.� ,i, }Q�i.{� .y.. {yy l c it= Gi • Jia. • { �. _ �1 1 '"{ � �p `944,4-..-T-01 ?..-. .mik +ter' I. �� ¢ �,wd 1 , -' ��r`.' - - _i ,',J.�. 1wi� ' Yi C _ i, ! 5. pj a 1. r ,,,„,... . i , .. , , ,..., , . s . _,,,,.. ,T 1 1 _. •.:411 .**4 . --,'t fr "r r r 4 , :'., w , r ` r d '� r IE �- r'_Elc , il___ ki...4 1St, , , i . - !Cr 1 .1 - -- _ M1 .F - IN 1. r k-. � '"� C' • - �.] - t� t i ' .....„,..._g_ _ ) , - 0% vehicles exiting just means that all of the cars stayed within the neighborhood and was not considered as cut through with no matching license plate numbers at other observation station Olney St East of Rio Hondo Ave Station FIGURE 11 17IPage a ° ' dIWL ZI Dhf19I3 uoIlelS pnig AI!D aidwa1Io;Sam is AauiO uorpnjs uopnn.rasgo.rare;o jo sdagwnu amid asuaar18unp vw ou qmit igno.np Ina sn pa.raptsuoa jou sant puv poog.roggQwu alp urt1prnt patfnjs srna atop ljn mg sunaw psnf2umxa sajarrjaa %O &WS 0Nf109103M OL-I CAM ALIO 31dW31 O1NO)IOY9 00 01 NW11 ft V 3QVW ONV 0A18 ALIO 31dW31 W021d 1HORI 0Nf1O8H1f1OS Ne1f111VH1 SNVO saL0N3a 1 .10iivei r 4 ( * 1 }riff.,i 'lf,,f ! l l , ' .1 ; - , # • I 'h 'f,._ .__- 1 ''�''=� I ` .;1 kRj, :'tea _ ,1 j1 ,j ,•. , _ �� �.:I- .»t . -.,,4+ ' ,.1 a i' '0 - ' J El_ 4 i , s ---� '--�i _ ! l _ CO''Li:j l' , I' erxim-s..,-,,,4, '4.'i.fr.v.3,_411n"IV,,,I ^ ‘ 1„1 . eg I I "' `,ilk' - i:,` 1 x rr' .I -- ; �.-,W ° r ~' . , - - ''c''.4* n°- . . .. IF—.IGr'N4f.�'' _1 r~•`'1.. �1 r 111- ta-. .7 rinr -- tA t ,n' z „ter . ,i ,. ` !O }. IItr er, , . 1 -� _- t ..„ - 1 �. .., _ ,...,_ - I 1 I pf - Wei yr- fie-- ', : , _.1 - , ; �! 4P 1 ., __ 4 . illw_ Li. _ ,I } `-� - r ,iti , 11 , �- is Jtst _ �, r. - - -21"----..." -,T 1r = y . - ai r�- ir-..pis.-__v .i. �,1 LA..-_---. ' .,17- r AEMaaid pals0Suoo atp Bunptonu salnoi pug 01 u! aut03 sddE.shuns pus az8M alp anion n Si S114 , •AEnnooid OI-I atp guolE salmi lallsJEd uo IanEal of iCEnnaaid 01-1 atp Sumong are Salatgan imp uogsalpui uE aq moo sitll_ .Vad INV aril Su1.tnQ and opuoH o►g oluo punoglsann IS /Cau1O uo palpta punoglsann gullanB.tl siEJ alp.jo%£g `uolpslS mg/CItD aiduuai Jo IsoM IS SiaulO alp.rod TWENTY-FOUR(24)HOUR AVERAGE DAILY COUNTS Twenty-Four hour counts were conducted at (7) seven segments within the study area. The detailed worksheets are included in the appendix.The following Table 8 shows a summary of the Counts: TABLE 8 Segment Name (24)hour average daily traffic-vehicles per day 1. Rio Hondo Ave north of Olney St 1,751 2. Olney St east of Rio Hondo Ave 1,981 3. Olney St west of Temple City Blvd 1,199 4. Temple City Blvd north of Olney St 30,245 5. Marshall St west of Temple City Blvd 2,553 6. Ellis Lane south of Marshall St 1,049 7. De Adalena St-west of Ellis Lane 1,969 No previous(24)hour counts are available for Olney St and therefore it is not possible to determine if the traffic on Olney St has increased over the years. Peak hour Turning Movement Counts EFI Performed Peak hour Turning Movement Counts(7-9 am and 4-6 pm) on 6/4/2019 at: 1. Temple City Blvd and Olney St 2. Rio Hondo Ave and Olney St The Complete Worksheets are enclosed in the appendix. The following is a summary of the peak 1 hour period during the AM&PM commute periods. 19 [ Page FIGURE 13 TEMPLE CITY BLVD AND OLNEY ST PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-AM 73 764 0 SR ST SL O EL WR 0 O ET 7:30-8:30 WT 0 58 ER WL 0 NL NT NR 0 1178 0 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-PM 70 981 0 SR ST SL 0 EL WR 0 O ET 17:00-18:00 WT 0 23 ER WL 0 NL NT NR 0 1141 0 FIGURE 14 RIO HONDO AVE AND OLNEY ST PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-AM O 18 28 SR ST SL 0 EL WR 97 0 ET 7:30-8:30 WT 0 0 ER WL 32 NL NT NR O 22 11 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-PM 0 13 46 SR ST SL 0 EL WR 38 0 ET 16:45-17:45 WT 0 0 ER WL 42 NL NT NR 0 22 24 201Page Level of service analysis EFI Performed a level of service analysis for Temple City Blvd and Olney St and Rio Hondo and Olney St for existing condition(before Closure) The following six levels of service definitions relate traffic conditions to traffic volumes and the design capacity of roadways and/or intersections. LOS A. There are no cycles that are fully loaded,.and few are even close to loaded. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Typically,the approach appears quite open,turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. LOS B. Represents stable operation. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number are approaching full use. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles. LOS C. Stable operation continues. Full signal cycle loading is still intermittent, but more frequent. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication, and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. LOS D. Encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks with the peak period,but enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of developing queues,thus preventing excessive backups. LOS E. Represents the most vehicles that any particular intersection approach can accommodate. At capacity (V/C= 1.00), there may be long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection and delays may be great(up to several signal cycles). LOS F. Represents jammed conditions. Backups from locations downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the approach under consideration; hence, volumes carried are not predictable. V/C values are highly variable, because full utilization of the approach may be prevented by outside conditions. The thresholds of level of service for unsignalized intersections are shown in the following table 9. TABLE 9 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA Two-Way or All-Way Stop Controlled Signalized Intersection Level of Service Intersection Average Delay per Vehicle(sec) Average Delay per Vehicle(sec) A 0-10 <10 B >10- 15 >10-20 211Page Two-Way or All-Way Stop Controlled Signalized Intersection Level of Service Intersection Average Delay per Vehicle(sec) Average Delay per Vehicle(sec) C >15-25 >20- 35 D >25-35 >35-55 E >35-50 >55-80 >80 or a V/C ratio equal or F >50 greater than 1.0 The following table 10 shows the summary of results: TABLE 10 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY PEAK EXISTING HOUR CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LOS Delay AM A 9.1 RIO HONDO AT OLNEY ST PM A 9.3 TEMPLE CITY BLVD AT AM C 15.3 OLNEY ST PM C 17.7 Both of the two unsignalized intersections are operating at an acceptable level of service ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL At the request of residents for additional stop signs,a brief analysis for all way stop warrants were conducted for following(2) intersections along Olney St: 1. Olney Street and Ellis Lane intersection 2. Olney Street and Marybeth Ave intersection The criteria for determining if an all-way stop control is warranted is based on a number of factors All-Way Stop Control between Segments: Stop signs are designed to control the flow of traffic, not as speed controls or pedestrian safety devices.Unwarranted stop signs can exacerbate already 22JPage existing speeding problems. Drivers will speed up between segments and will often ignore a stop sign in a new location.Must have continual police enforcement to be effective. The criteria for placement of all-way stop control as set by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) needs to be followed. The placement of All-Way stop control is warranted when': • Traffic control signals are justified • A crash problem exists as indicated by 5 or more accidents in a 12-month period • Minimum Volumes are met: • Volume entering intersection from the major approach(total of both approaches)averages 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. And • The combined vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street approaches averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours. • If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major-street exceeds 40 mph the minimum volumes are 70 percent of the above values. Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left turn conflict B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations generating high pedestrian volumes C. Locations where a road user,after stopping cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting traffic is also required to stop. D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multiway stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. The California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control (CAMUTCD) covers all aspects of the placement,construction and maintenance of every form of approved traffic control.The guidelines prescribe five basic requirements for all devices. They must: • Fulfill a need • Command attention • Convey a clear and simple meaning • Command respect of road users • Give adequate time for proper response Other factors include potential sight obstructions and engineering judgment. The study concluded that the following intersections did not meet traditional minimum volume or accident thresholds as determined by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD Section 2B.07) for the installation of All-Way stop control: California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices,Section 28.07 Multiway Stop Applications page 2B-7 23 IPage 1. Olney Street and Ellis Lane intersection does not meet the criteria for an All-Way stop control listed above. 2. Olney Street and Marybeth Ave intersection does not meet the criteria for an All-Way stop control listed above. Coordination with the County Sheriff and Fire Departments The Fire Department Feedback EFI contacted the Fire Department on 6-6-2019 and asked what impact would the closure of Olney Street have on the Fire Department operation. The Fire department personnel indicated that the closure of Olney Street would have no effect on dispatching Fire department personnel and equipment. They also indicated that the fire department will use Rio Hondo Ave to Olney Ave and that there would be no Impact to the response time. As for the closure of the street without a culdesac with a 40' radius, the fire department also indicated that they would be able to backup the fire truck if the City closed the street. The Sheriff's Department Feedback EFI contacted the Sheriff's Department on 6/18/2019 and asked: What impact would the closure of Olney St have on the Sheriff's Department operation.The closure would not impact the Sheriffs response time because deputies use the major Arterials when responding to a call. Caltrans Jurisdiction EFI Contacted Caltrans to determine if the west leg of Olney St closure at Temple City Blvd is a viable option. On 6/5/2019, we contacted Caltrans encroachment section and discussed the potential closure with Dara Loeung with the encroachment permit division and we were told that as far as the encroachment permit division is concerned, there is no issues with the closure of the east end of Olney St as long as the work is done outside of Caltrans R/W. I also contacted Mahmoud Hajjar in operations and traffic investigations.Mr.Hajjar indicated that Caltrans does not have any objections to the closure of the west leg of Olney St at Temple City Blvd or Temple City Blvd southbound right turn lane into Olney St as long as the work is done outside of Caltrans R/W. Field review A field review was taken for Temple City Blvd and Olney St. This included collecting the existing signing and striping. 24IPage rill- t =•" I - •tlet„ib„.. ,._. . . =- .�,; it •111[1F_ Ill .. x,34_` ., OLNEY ST NEAR TEMPLE CITY BLVD LOOKING EAST IV 4 . -..,,,...,t, ., : _. Aon h 1?„'.; . :t i 0 a } it + T 14 • I -��. r --- ,.4 1:4 ' . Iiii.:17- ,i. - dqe qf +1 4•• :r ,.�!y� 2 - Y . (yi p Y r t; !,/lik. , .e, , am,iiii ,zr•":Pi' :r•- ,,, : , • • ' ,-- •17.•••-..i, :, .• ••,„),, ,fti: ig, „NI.. lit... . 1 ii..., . , ,,, ,i ,..!...„. v:1; : _ . , ., . ; -:), :„:1. ....,....,.,_ _ ...7.7„,,,;, :.:,..... .,,,.,,;...;54 ,41....11.1...1.,ir„-_ . --. , - INt. ,:„..$0,....„,,,_ „: „.11_,,,,,,- ,_ , , 'ite. i ) • O. 1< 1 ' • V • 25IPage Presently,as shown in Exhibit 1,the Southbound traffic on Temple City Blvd can turn right onto Olney St or continue to merge onto the I-10 Westbound ramp. Eastbound Olney St turns into the I-10 westbound on-ramp.No left turns out of Olney St at Temple City Blvd are allowed. Partial or full closure The City may consider two options:Full closure or partial Closure of Olney St. Full Closure As shown in the Exhibit 2,a full closure will close eastbound Olney Street onto the I-10 westbound ramp and the Southbound right turn from Temple City Blvd onto Olney St. Full closure can be accomplished by removing the existing Island and reconstructing the pavement, constructing new curb and gutter and sidewalk and installing guardrails to prevent cars from driving over the curb and gutter. The signing and striping has to be modified for southbound Temple City Blvd to allow traffic to merge into a single lane. The signing and striping on Olney Street would have to be modified to reflect the closure of the Street. Advantages of full closure The full closure of Olney Street at the east end would provide relief for a portion of Olney St between Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd.Advantages would include: • Eliminate traffic backup eastbound on Olney Street Near the I-10 On-ramp. • Provide relief for residents living on Olney St near Temple City Blvd to allow residents on the south side to exit their driveways. • Eliminate the U-turns into resident's driveways by traffic wanting to beat the queues along Temple City Blvd. Disadvantages of full closure As stated earlier, Mobile apps route traffic thru neighborhood streets to get cars from point A to point B to avoid congestion on the freeway or other segments without regards to the consequences of such routing. Potential for Increase traffic volumes on the following adjacent streets: • Ellis Lane from Olney to Marshall St • Marshall St from Temple City Blvd to Ellis Lane and, • Increase in the Queue length on Temple City Blvd southbound • Potentially increase the volume on the remaining segment of Olney St from EIlis Lane to Rio Hondo Ave. as people are routed to avoid the longer queues on Temple City Blvd. 26IPage • Closure will affect how residents in the neighborhood travel to and from to their homes ri--„i ), • ....- ', A f F .NCS _i t. - , t i ill. :'''' ' fa 4 - 0ot /,, � 9;`.r'r' :.t. r,r J. N�1C1YB 151AM,I.:1,..,.,_. . , } r u r ,lNL?S7RLPlh�7 n•'.» •. F ''�tt4RDit.- �t ik UiaYEY 5T ".�: .::, e� , 0. , . , i, - . , 4 f "711.11..,i -,, ,-: ii i". 1 )11::\ i . . . _ .......... ref- 1 ., �. is d 1 * y 1'ti• 1 / r t 27IPage 1 Partial Closure As shown in exhibit 3,a partial closure will close eastbound Olney Street onto the I-10 westbound, while maintaining the Southbound right turn from Temple City Blvd onto Olney St. The partial closure can be accomplished by extending the existing Island and installing guardrails to prevent cars from driving over the island. The signing and striping on Olney Street would have to be modified to reflect the partial closure of the Street. Signing modifications with advance signage on Olney St stating that there is no access to Temple City Blvd and WB 1-10 Ramps would also be needed. Advantages of Partial Closure The partial closure of Olney street at the east end would provide relief for a the portion of Olney St between Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd.A partial closure would: • Eliminate traffic backup eastbound on Olney Street Near the I-10 On-ramp. • After and adjustment period, provide relief for residents on the south side of Olney St that are presently having a hard time exiting the driveways. • After and adjustment period,will eliminate the U-turns into resident's driveways Disadvantages of Partial Closure As stated earlier, Mobile apps route traffic thru neighborhood streets to get cars from point A to point B to avoid congestion on the freeway or other segments without any regard to the consequences of such routing. There may be an increase in traffic volumes on the following adjacent streets: • Ellis Lane from Olney to Marshall St • Marshall St from Temple City Blvd to Ellis Lane and, • Increase in Queue lengths on Temple City Blvd southbound • Closure will affect how residents in the neighborhood travel to and from their homes 28 ' Page Lsm P : i i . s 1, • rKp _ i I . t c;. ri, ' i‘ ,=, • I 1 I i ' 5, :::-. ` 0 'I" r I -i _ t ' ` ,y , Ji.( • / - _ 4 . ,___________ ,i .; .L. xe�rry;1, il_PVj �AND I I �- ST Milk,s;',' ' \ t ' 1, i 1 '_. °. . — s 1 , —\ . 3 P.i.r ' " I to -W _5 t . ''' 1 a ,44 ) .1" , , ',4,,-"A ()SURE ONLY 291Page The Impact of Olney St closure on cut-through Traffic The cut-through traffic pattern before and after closure are shown in figures 15 and 16 below. —_ --z -�I . a_ .. _ t n---IE-- a 4 L. Miff ,.• ii ' 1TifT _, r-- �..__ , _ � -1 I a r f r,g i 1`1 - l-4i . � F- 1 - r .rte. ,�, ` a _. • �. 4.:. �' '� sJ�! .� � � . T gilial b - : I.Q. _ F ._ill.. e �.. F- ,_ii.4, T. t'7f�S 1 s f r4�y , yr ,l !t-x. .i.mini . - _ if arm .a-.-,.1 ,- J t - ^1L.1.w.5—= .�olt�% Q rt.. �' ai...- .7.-1. -._..4 - .� y•�l. .� Aii-7_44 y b . r — 1ffj ;}yi4 r.. @1"4-1151 i�..,. l iar. ��rw r� t�'r�. AIM . f ' ..,••••I •-•14.-f.-.1. W gk 1 '-y '' •fir aliji ._* t''-• ' 1/44^ ' i "'� LillST , �1� 7i"�J r�' _ 4 .00 • - 1 , r . 1,,t / ...P1., ......:. .mq a9 ,."... s`i. it • ... i 1, ! r f i t F t �i `• ti c bait �` ,�e. e L. ,. .� r�. q rr, e, Ire ` iti. it •`. t1 •-` , - '--' r _ . - - . . "� LEGEND _.m-as sm.' ..w lri.Y—"rte ...s._ _ r. _ _ - r. • - CUT-TRHOUGH TRAFFIC PATTERN BEFORE FULL CLOSURE FIGURE 15 30IPage The cut-through Traffic Pattern after full closure will be the same except for the segment on Olney St between Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd. The traffic volume on Marshall St and Ellis Lane is expected to increase as commuters change their travel pattern due to the closure. j1.,,,... , , _-71ik _._,......7---1-- ------,-...._,1----...--, - v a — , . , . , , l nq r -,., ream : )10.4 4 d_ - , _ _ .,, i ii r+- - 4 13 * ..' 011 y. -. a' j l •. �r Cs ,n 1 ,:Q., ria' -_ ii i:s y •_.itailt, iM•._ ( i ,,,4 i _, --. rm A , ._. .-IN. '4, A. " — , ' - ' _ . �1. � r - • ii '..-4-40;it t « 1_-r •([,�" ITIt 'mow • � • 1 P .-..•r - P/ px. ke r --vale ,C."_.=;'- �_i+ l�_ ..r 4-7,.• --1 r }` 1 t d g_ • 1 "N"i 1-,„--i-,--, �5... ..-J -- . .. '--- - '_(}-�-�' .II. + ,'...4--,7 rte. _ .5.' I 0 i • 1' .c.s. ``l 1 . L it.e • ' F."*- !g,„„,, ^. I,�...I.R,-..._n-:. itSUL _ 4.-2.='-. d.c � • -1 n 7. • , i . AFTER FULL CLOSURE CUT-TRHOUGH TRAFFIC PATTERN FIGURE 16 31IPage The Impact of Olney St closure on Olney St Traffic Flow As shown in Figure 17 below, 58 cars travel eastbound on Olney Street and turn right onto the westbound I-10 onramp during the Am peak hour and 23 vehicles during the PM Peak hour. After the closure of Olney Street, these motorists are likely to travel easterly on Olney St, then northerly on Ellis Ln,Marybeth Ave,or Vane Ave to reach Marshall St.,then east to Temple City Blvd. Approximately 73 cars per hour travel southbound On Temple City Blvd and turn right into Olney street during the AM peak and 70 cars during PM peak hours. After full closure,these motorists are more likely to use Marshall St to travel west,then southerly along Ellis Ln, Marybeth Ave,or Vane Ave to reach Olney St, then Westerly on Olney St to Rio Hondo. ► ., , 1*. c* K. +jer 7 t.., . -4- k y r I j•• 3 Li, e � ,ef � � t � a liv ,... othili iLiNity 01 tlipit-if-i, i . , si -.. k) ,,,,i, 11.-- w 40 ���� 7 / _ 1 f ' KV 11 TURNING MOVEMENTS OLNEY ST . -.. � : . ; f TO AND FROM TEMPLE CITY BLVD' TURNING MOVEMENT ON OLNEY ST TO/D FROM TEMPLE CITY BLVD FIGURE 17 32JPage The Impact of Olney St closure on the southbound Temple City Blvd North of Olney St after full closure If the City chooses to Close Olney St at Temple City Blvd,the traffic pattern will change.Analysis of the impacts on southbound Temple City Blvd would be challenging. Caltrans controls the on- ramp by metering the entrance to the Westbound I-10 freeway.This metering controls the number of vehicles entering the westbound freeway during various times of the day. As the I-10 freeway gets more congested, fewer cars are allowed to enter the traffic stream at a time. This effectively guides the queue on Temple City Blvd. In order to try and determine the impact, a queue study was conducted on 6/19/2019 to show the existing car backup on Temple City Blvd. The worksheets are enclosed in the Appendix. In general,during the peak hours (7-9 am and 4-6 pm),the southbound queue reached Loftus Dr. several times. The queue extended beyond Loftus Dr eight times during the 4 hour period but did not reach Marshall St at any time during the observation period. See queue Figure 18 below. As stated earlier, 58 cars travel eastbound on Olney Street and turn right onto the westbound 1-10 onramp during the AM peak hour. With closure,this traffic will travel northerly on Ellis Lane and Easterly On Marshall St. This translate into approximately 5 more cars in the southbound queue per 5 minute cycle interval. The traffic has the potential to backup even further after the full closure. Figure 18 shows the present queue and the expected additional queue due to the closure and the re-routing of traffic to the back of the queue. 33IPage �. ilit __+� _, k ,� I ,L , -„trimii,,,; , a . II' 10 f - , : : •1 ' --.1 i :. 1 .i._„4„, , . . X. .. , L ct,A - ... . ., Rim imyr ' - . 16 c le ` S ri 1 . ill 1.► _ ,.. k.lAi itt _EGEIND �, + iiimmons QUEUE BEFORE CLOSuI.L ' LOFTI. e PROJECTED ADDITIONAL I - � � --.41-' 11-a.4 QUEUE AFTER CLOSUR h ; 176" 1'�"�: f . it sihr_rl • - I ir rirwt " - , Hri' . - 1 ,r1)., . ..,11- 2, a s _7,.. OLNEY STSI! � ;T 011111,i,1 ;41;.16 ki . -k :�;� 1 �r •II f. d !# ' r • -1+1 • w r .r.--w- -7 -'^ --r i - le 3= i i M •, QUEUE ON TEMPLE CITY BLVD BEFORE AND AFTER CLOSURE FIGURE 18 341 Page SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The closure of Olney Street is a Viable option.The following is a summary of the Advantages and Disadvantages of full closure. Advantages of full closure The full closure of Olney Street at the east end would provide relief for a the portion of Olney St between Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd. As follows: • Eliminates traffic backup eastbound on Olney Street Near the I-10 On-ramp. • Provide relief for residents on the south side within that portion experiencing difficulty exiting the driveways. • Eliminates the U-turns into resident's driveways Disadvantages of full closure As stated earlier, Mobile apps route traffic thru neighborhood streets to get cars from point A to point B to avoid congestion on the freeway or other segment without any regards to the consequences of such routing. Potential increase of traffic volume on the following adjacent streets: • Ellis Lane from Olney to Marshall St • Marshall St from Temple City Blvd to Ellis Lane and, • Increase the Queue length on Temple City Blvd southbound • Potentially increase the volume on the remaining segment of Olney St from Ellis Lane to Rio Hondo Ave. as people are routed to avoid the longer queues. • Closure will affect how residents in the neighborhood travel from to their homes The following Summary of findings Table 11 addresses most of the issues raised by residents living near the Olney St segment at community meetings: TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS TABLE ISSUE Findings Comments Many cars are traveling at Police report does not show speed Inconclusive. Results niay be excessive speeds on Olney Street, citations skewed based on the lack of speed enforcement for that segment. 35IPage ISSUE Findings Comments Speeding on Olney St. Speed Survey reflects many Unfortunately, speeding is an instances of speeds higher than 25 issue in many communities. MPH Bigger speed signs and speed pavement legends can be installed. Speed feedback sign can be placed along with police enforcement. ...there have been many The accident rate is higher than the The two intersections on Olney St accidents; speed humps or statewide rate do no meet all way stop Warrants. additional stop signs are needed Speed Humps can be installed on to slow down the vehicles Olney St if/when the City adopts a policy for the installation of speed humps There has been an increase in Police report seem to indicate that It is difficult to correlate the crime robberies in the area due to the the overall crime peaked in rate to the proximity of the proximity of the 1.-10 Freeway on- 2017/2018 and declined freeway on-Ramp access. ramp 2018/2019 There has been a significant The volume on Olney St is 1981 No previous data is available for increase in traffic volumes on cars in 24 hr.This volume is typical Olney St to determine if traffic is Olney Street for a local street increasing Westbound cars are continuing to This was observed to be true.Many Full Closure would eliminate that make U-turns on Olney Street cars enter Olney St from Temple issue between Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd Southbound and make a City Boulevard U turn to get on the I-10 westbound On-Ramp Vehicles headed southbound on This action may be intentional or Full Closure would eliminate that Temple City sometimes get unintentional. This was observed issue by removing the right turn trapped in the far right lane, to be true.Many cars enter Olney St lane. However; this is likely to forcing them to make a right turn and make a U turn to get on the I- increase the queue on Temple City onto Olney Street, then making a 10 westbound On-Ramp Blvd during the morning AM U-turn on Olney to get onto the peak. All southbound traffic will freeway. share a single lane to enter the Freeway Since there is no sidewalk on The City can construct sidewalk in City may be able to apply for Olney Street, kids walk in the the City Right of way. This may be funds thru the Highway streets on the way to Savannah a contentious issue with residents Safety Improvement Program to School; kids can't play in the that do not want to disturb their install sidewalk due to the street due to all the cars; it's not front yard. proximity to a school. safe Those making U-turns on Olney This was observed to be true for Full Closure would eliminate that Street often drive up onto the residences on Olney St near issue resident's driveways, Temple City Blvd. 36IPage • ISSUE Findings Comments It can be difficult to back out of This was observed to be true for Full Closure would eliminate that the driveways during rush hour. residences on the south side of issue Olney St near Temple City Blvd due to queue of cars waiting to get on the I-10 Westbound on-ramp. • Vehicles are bypassing the This was found to be true by the Full Closure would eliminate that southbound traffic on Temple license plate survey. issue City Boulevard by cutting Approximately 20%of the traffic in through on Ellis Lane and Olney the AM traveled on Marshall St Street to get to the freeway. then south on Ellis and east on Onley St to get on the I-10 westbound freeway Can Olney Street be closed at Yes The street can be closed similar to the easterly end Olney St portion to the east of Temple City Blvd Caltrans feedback on closing Caltrans does not object to Olney Any work within Caltrans right of Olney Street leading to the on- Street closure way would require an ramp onto the westbound I-10 encroachment permit Freeway The Fire Department feedback The Fire Department does not on closing Olney Street object to Olney Street closure leading to the on-ramp onto the westbound I-10 Freeway The Sheriff's Department The Sheriff's Department does not feedback on closing Olney object to Olney Street closure Street leading to the on-ramp onto the westbound I-10 Freeway - Advantage of closing Olney St Segment of Olney Street between Temple City Blvd and Ellis Lane would see a substantial traffic reduction. Disadvantage of Closing Traffic will likely to increase on The remaining segment between Olney Street Ellis Lane between Marshall St and Ellis Lane and Rio Hondo will Olney St and Marshall St between continue to have the same traffic Ellis Lane and Temple City Blvd volume and pattern Other issues raised by closing The Queue on Temple City Blvd Olney St SB will increase during peak hours --- ------- -- - 37iPage Conclusion The residents living on Olney St between Rio Hondo Avenue and Temple City Boulevard experience cut-through traffic and speeding motorists. The study found the majority of the issues raised by the residents to be true and offered some solutions that could mitigate some of the problems. Unfortunately, most of the solutions have advantages and disadvantages. As stated earlier closing OIney St on the east end at Temple City Blvd would ease some of the problems,but would increase problems at other locations. Installing speed cushions reduces the speed but creates additional noise and aesthetic problems at the installed locations. Some of the traffic will migrate to adjacent streets to avoid the speed cushions. This would simply transfer the problem to another corridor/neighborhood. The City should solicit resident input from all residents in the entire neighborhood because closure or partial closure will affect the travel patterns for all residents who may be taking a child to/from school, practice, shopping,going to work, etc... Technically,the data indicates that the closure at Olney St is a viable option. However, since this will affect the traffic routes of the residents living in the area, residents should be given a public forum to voice their input to the traffic commission during the review and possible approval process. If the City decides that Olney St is to be closed before the I-10 westbound ramp,the City would need to prepare preliminary construction plans for the closure of Olney Street. Funding sources have to be identified and approved by the City Council. Construction plans, specifications, and cost estimate may then be prepared to close Olney St. The design plans should be prepared to minimize any construction on Caltrans right of way as such construction would require an encroachment permit which typically takes 12 to 18 months to acquire. 38IPage APPENDIX CITATIONS • r LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TEMPLE STATION . Citation Report 06-Jun-19 Total Citations: 2 Report No. Date Time Day Violation Name Cite Street • Cite addresss Veh Lic Veh S AA600670 3/13/2018 10:44 Tuesday 23123(a) 11111111111ft OLNEY STMoils,,CA 16028(a) AA731398 10/3/2018 18:22 Wednesda 12500(a) 10110r OLNEY ST 9520 IMO CA 4000(x)(1) - • • • • 1 CRIME REPORT City of Rosemead Part I Crimes within a Boundary (Marshall St/Temple City Blvd/Olney St/Rio Hondo Ave) Do nthrena Si r Sa;art,an _, a E12minta<y Scrscwa 4,r4.I 'i � r j,.1 '.,�.1 r r = ..t`,, �., ' . .F O dt z i ' l, 1 ." ,d W is .t' +"_ o• 1 } (2, ,° 1623 96,-- U v J '+i' u, Iffs e, 4 1.I Y #,41. gil 2 sr 0 'ioir.. ,� v44„1 .rg—, * fix ,V2 r fi 1 .j ! I a it ,lr, D y J` .)'' .�.. .i ' ...,.a { c 3 X4si 2, f yT.J 's i +i .i 42f : , U n tY 5 t -- SAN BERN FRWY X10FRAN — -. ,Southern Pacific RR -a =_ J 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 Homicide 0 0 0 Rape 0 0 0 Robbery 0 0 0 Assault 0 0 0 Burglary 2 3 4 Larceny 2 7 3 GTA 1 5 2 Arson 0 0 0 City of Rosemead Part I Crimes within a Boundary (Marshall St/Temple City Blvd/Olney St/Rio Hondo Ave) June 1 , 2018 thru May 31 . 2019 I i ti 14. k • _ . , ' _� + �/' - va t a - 3 .. . �- t , . 3 • s G0, - ,w' -' , iii i - . * CRIME TYPE 4 BURGLARY- RESIDENTIAL 2 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE (GTA) 1 OTHER THEFT 2 THEFT FROM MOTOR VEHICLE City of Rosemead Part I Crimes within a Boundary (Marshall St/Temple City Blvd/Olney St/Rio Hondo Ave) 4 aptthat,51 i E ' QIP ij i t > I Z ., *_1 1 . 4 --._-,1t : .. 4 . 4 _J ) e , .._ 1 4. '-- ;. . Q. villP gilt . ..e; CRIME TYPE 3 BURGLARY- RESIDENTIAL 5 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE (GTA) 1 OTHER THEFT 6 THEFT FROM MOTOR VEHICLE City of Rosemead Part I Crimes within a Boundary (Marshall St/Temple City Blvd/Olney St/Rio Hondo) June 1 , 2016 thru May 31 . 2017 • t . t S 3 s caw . . g i s -4 $ 1 p •i if _1 - ,A, • AI . 1 P i P: t .....,.. It , - : = ...4), A--, .• t CRIME TYPE 2 BURGLARY - RESIDENTIAL 1 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE (GTA) 2 THEFT FROM MOTOR VEHICLE CUT THRU TRAFFIC WORKSHEET DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 7-7:15 am Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 419 807 8XH 908 013 137 221 194 226 395 075 103 50% 320 429 605 395 730 943 128 208 316 751 778 7F2 996 366 614 648 873 979 756 860 970 Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 7:15.7:30 am Entry Point:E8 DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru E8 ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB WO Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 094 608 027 150 304 071 051 116 024 041 052 001 025 44% 631 724 363 618 720 156 160 274 086 136 217 089 102 207 730 F. ., 914 752 817 361 390 406 329 346 376 291 348 399 988 419 451 458 473 506 511 541 713 533 648 680 524 550 6S8 730 773 735 742 743 691 707 739 954 760 -7.8 821 754 764 961 871 909 925 929 944 949 WHT BMW NP Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 7:30-7:45 am Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB WO Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 105 162'•. 'AR 032 140 257 089 150 155 072 140 149 083 122 140 35% 247 265 274 393 868 932 200 210 236 272 288 291'- 1111 280 313 331 513 952 348 415 460 306 319 329 471' 4SA 514 524 472 484 4U1 486 513 516 513 516 604 600 650 658 4Y1 503 518 546 547 575 619 639 650 r .n.:_>. 849 539- 612 604 608 626 757 765 869 958 991 632 647 654 657 660 689 825 887 891 993 652 766 898 777�.; :..___ 810 904 949 901 923 923 868 888 942 927 955 961 989 AM9 TOS Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 7:45-8:00 am Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 046 086 010 117 162 013 036 OP2 050 093 099 026 050 48% 144 214 269 164' 212 227 132 134 187 148 186 227 086 118 152 274 279 298 241 283 293 189 209 214 245 284 335 205 214 262 282 308`."°" .: "i' ` 345 415 419 237 285 2A2 375 401 514 284 306 308 442 455 455 448 473 493 317344 374 547 662 694 331 348 1111 515 525• 552 396 422 770 865 868 3H1 447 608 700 734 567' 583 613 438 492 511 915 933 939 4U1 546 553 961 969 646' 766 771 528 546 551 9X1 M.C. 581_ 612 794• 824 866 562 5K1 612 626 662 894 942 A28' 607 619 619 694 725 785 644 667 718 867 915 923 734 735 749 935 961 975 755 784 785 MN2 785 805 812 832 845 862 867 877 899 942 947 952 961 998 C10_ Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 8:00-8:15 am Entry Point:EB OE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY I.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 064 222 233 364 008 019 109 064 067 102 045 67% 104 17. 370' 372 411 155 221 295 111 119 125 119 129 348 450 453 432• 516 617' 394 4E2 616 188 238 227 250 5K1 5N1 665 748' 796 5N1 604 622 293 376 384 321 348 350 620 6R1 841 946' 672 707 759 387 419 422 439 462 797 804 810 681 714 755 511 5N1 608 876 886 936 793 847 609 6E2 6G1 936 939 979 708 756 786 890- 947 9NS T93 Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 8:15-8:30 am Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 291 335 372 005 2 E 0 309 069 096 139 OU1 240 279 036 091 109 30% 620 755 623 692 744 296 305 307 307 312 412 139 192 1 E2 810 868 SIR TOW TRUCK 319 339 352 570 607 773 262 406 407 NNA 398 417 603 878 927 962 422 540 570 627 648 653 611 810 677 694 810 914 854 899 976 WHT TRUCK ACE E18 141 Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 8:30-8:45 am Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 097ii. - 124 452 654 033 034 118 135 Fil 210 282 56% 1T1 252 417 677• 717 739 OP2 143 213 177 2N2 326 372 417 497 785 838 772 7C2 7N2 299 212 411 329 336 395 4N2 511 555 827 EJC' 427 459 465 351 414 4L1 615 654 693 4N2 628 636 545 560 562 6M1 785 637 696 6V0 597 615 658 810 982 718 749 776 766 751 933 785 834 873 982 918 X27 ELK BMW CREVIER Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 8:45-9:00 am Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 034 482 025 194 350 058 OW1 139 005 131 205 052 168 1T1 33% 645 670 448 499 546 160 357 497 252 511 528 284 291 801 563 L39 603 614 617 565 605 629 294 314 368 BLUE STAR 704 755 802 684 846 923 378 396 442 834 902 91741' ,„._; 495 668 BOB U67 954 ACE N96 Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 4-4:15 Pm Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET ExIt Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 064 121 171 122 316` 390 164 413 467 008 019 039 034,.,;s--_ 308 29% 203 280 533' 611• 671 503 51(2 122 209 5P1 310 368 284 304 786 639 567 827 401 448 481 340 3 E1 _ 854 960 556 670 682 829 867 6WD 756 851 867 Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 4:15-4:30 Pm Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points 96 Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB NM Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 128 138 235 121 702• T98 065 077 210 008 118 118 147 312 341 24% 290 312 376 282 296 2F2 147 1 E 2 323 419 476 523 419 509 587 380 396 491 374 481 481 580 818 582 540 540 566 512 551 572 783 863 F18 6XH 763 882 5: '. 6V0 728 877 956 8K2 728 741 784 BLUE BLAZER 710 813 830 936 960 Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 4:30-4:45 Pm Entry Point:ES DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 124 217 083 364 455 010 172 176 036 273 282 OL1 OW1 118 22% 318 3V1 483 533 9X1 1A2 305 313 344 575 618 128, 1 209 46S 501 595 342 455 4F2 633 652 662 2M1 344 397 635 670' ° '°= ;' 480 547 558 702 715 726 441 598 745 820 576 621 633 756 991 630 657 840 873 8P1 770 780 914 BLUE BLAZER 6N2 749 763 935 944 951 N52 973 Location: DE ADALENA STREET E8 EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 4:45-5:00 Pm Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru ES ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 001- 050 518 576 713' 024 053 075 075 129 172 004- 162 39% 055 123 155 845 098 136 138 203 239 258 260 397 4V1 200 240 159 206® 438 442- 508 559 574 283 284 315 282 303 654 582 669 757 581 611 316 508 750 755 788 830 687983 ,;=:. 741 ' 756 509 541 567 HONDA LA WHT VFW 840- 636 ,,„,,t,•:•.,,',..:'.*: 904 741 752 • 815 8P2 940 943 VFW Location: DE ADALENA STREET ER EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 5:00-5:15 Pm Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney ER W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall ER W/0 TCBLVD 027 077 091 234 252 909 OKS 266 074 152 249 013 077_ 53% 098 191 918 473 528 632 316 318 332 7,1=i 7 239 193 698 709 746 428 493 537 3E 1 466 239 466 811 555 562 705 524 592 933 967 745 761 776 703 750 756 825 869 894 757 780 840 845 846 NNA Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 5:15-5:30 Pm Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 086 106' 208 269 024 034 054 OV1— 180 0M1 47% 099 203 448 669' 959' 068 068 166 216 217 270 103 226 236 273 :, 171 294 361 272 279 2M1 251 306 329 7 ` 575 769 424 464 467 347 399 421 tti.,... 34� 369 456 904 920 489 511 541 429 439 427 491 515 936 966 546 674 6P1 534 566 650,,,._.:'w1 604 987 708 812 949 765 785 824 818 826 925 952 869 926 958 936MM. ADO C64 Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 5:30-5:45 Pm Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 018 058 OAT 047` 706 OF2 134 008 032 055 034— 47% 144 196 237 . —,; 070 105 192 263 313 3R1 181 293 395 422 423 378 395 535 411 435 462 ,.-t,.:$4 384 411 443 484 4C2 616 656 662 581 616 448 4A1 S02 556 652 698 667 769 833 649- 724 799 511MMi= - 511 808 935IMMI 960 71 1 - S93 616 658 -.$7 S73 72 683 41,.. .. 711 WXL ,.. ::saw 915 927 Location: DE ADALENA STREET EB EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 5:45-6:00 Pm Entry Point:EB DE ADALENA STREET Exit Points %Cut Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 007 072 111 138 171 306 044 082 122 013 083 129 122 63% 139 150 412 481 717;`:'+111 277 507 144 171 195 290 291 ..'=:..-.:. 737 896 540 610 647 209 260 299 397 3A2 442 237 272 388 684 700 753 322 329 329 474 498 412 448 761 805 948 334 335 363 561 751 466 514 561 956_ 905 437 479 506_ 866 922 141 594 610 612 948 DEF F18 785 795 838 724 754 STT 368 DEE 141 816 827 908 SXT 944 948 BLK BENTLY ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 7-7:15 am Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 103 128 235 807 8XH 908 013 137 221 194 226 274 035 075 103 86% 7y„ 614 320 605 281 395 395 128 208 316 751 778 712 552 587 593 366 614 873 979 730 788 911 756 860-„` >: 975 CREVIER RED BMW Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 7:15-7:30 am Entry Point:513 ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru ER ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD r 035_ 027 150 304 071 116 024 041 052 001 ' e x? 025 73% , 271 363 363 618 720 156 160 274 135 213 317 089 ,., 207 730 752 780 817 361 390 406 329 329 344 291 348 399 780 855 988 451 458 365 473 482 541 674 713 533 648 680 506 608 658 730 773 . 780 735 742- 689 754 764 954 760 780 821 849 961 989 8T1 909 925 929 944 949 WHT BMW NP • Location: ELLIS LANE 58 NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 7:30-7:45 am Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB 6/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 083.,... ;:--C'!- 032 140 257 089 150 155 014 089 081 083 122 140 69% 376 396 393 868 932 200 210 236 116 132 149 M4 =:.�' 313 513. 516 952 348 415 460 162 189 245 471 524 547 472 484 4U1 247 247 272 513 516 s i 658 4Y1 503 518 274 282 302 619 639 650 752 798 539 612 306 319 350 765 818 869 632 647 654 354 386 387 887 887 6S2 766 898 455 467 486" 949 923 923 516 568 600 927 955 626 660 770 777 784 808- 883 942 958 958 AM9 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 7:45-8:00 am Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adaiena WB E/0 Rio Thru 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD ' mirsmcommimosmnimmanimm MEM 87% ®'' ®®® ELI 241 MIS ®IIIME1•1151111=01 MIMI MEM _-.1IMEI®11111133 2A2 ffilIMIEEIMENIMIEM MOO 32:11MINCIEIFED31131•111MIIMMI131111113MINCIMIIIIICES IMO ®® 396 MEI 483MISIIIIIIIM®MZEI magma mom - EmEmmig 700 755 797 4U1 546 553 1 INIII13111111103® IMO 836 NX*-, 1111111=3 ZI:BMZEEI MI=111110331=1M1 MOM 111111 MID IMERMZEIMMIMICIMMEMEE1111=11 MEM ®IIIIIIEI*=111111111111111®1111111111111 ------IMEM1 3tI -- ---- -MIIIIIIIEZEIMMEI--_-- ------® ®------ ------® ®------ Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 8-8:15 am Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD ,,...: 066 222_ 364 019 109 067 125 196 045 54% 111 119 370' 372 411 155 221 295 269 275 104 119 129 128 152 178 432' 516 617• 394 4 E2 516 398- 455 178 250 245 665 748' 796 622 543 562 868 321 350 284 350 841 946' 672 707 759 888 888 MKT 439 462 394 797 804 810 NNA 608 452 „„ ;"'" 876 886 936 609 6 E 2_ 547 550 552 936 939 979 708 756 786 608 .. 890- 947 612 654 9NS T93 705 708 734 786 793 854 867 9X1 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 8:15-8:30 am Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 091 :.. t.ti 2 E 0 309 069 096 139 022 058 059 036 091 109 71% 291 2G2 309 623 692 296 305 307 OU1 139 156 139 1E2 570 SIR TOW TRUCK 319 339 352 189 203 240 262 406 407 727 796 398 417 603 279 262 312- 540 570 976 627 648- 315 322 335 611 727 810 677 694 810 412 453 570- 914 854 899 976 586 5K2 607 WHT TRUCK ACE E18 341 679 707 708 773 927 928 AD12 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 8:30-8:45 am Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 053 1T1 124 452 654 033 053 053 034 097 112 210" 282 75% 282 677• 717 739 OP2 143- 177 258 274 497 540 ; ; 772 7C2 7N2 299 2J2 411 279 293 351 4N2® _ q, 755 827 EJC• 427 459 465 534 545 560 654 693 4N2 628 636 597 658 766 785 808 637 696 6V0 803 838 842 810 982 718 749 776 933 982 D14 785 834 873 918 X27 BLK BMW CREVIER Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 8:45-9:00 am Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 034 058 025 01T1 69% 160--"" 222 448 499194 546 160058 357OWl 497139 16705 177078 475131 222 284 291 328 563 L.39 603 614 617 511 528 565 294 314 368 497 654 7N1 BLUE STAR 704 755 802 569 577 629 378 396 442 808 834 902 917 676 755 923 668 7N1 B05 U67 954 ACE N96 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 4-4:15 Pm Entry Point:SB ELUS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 122 203 284 122 316' 390 164 413 467 038 176 209 034 281 308 57% 310 344 533' 611' 671 503 51(2 374 9T0 310 368 436 481 786 401 min 481 556 682 873 911 6WD=FM Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 4:15-4:30 Pm Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD ` • : 281 702' T98 065 077 103 147 177 147 341 56% 341 282 296 2F2 1A2 318 481 476 523 376 3 E 1 380 396 491 4B1 637 817 580 5K2 818 51(2 551 631 540 566 512 829 877 887 863 977 F18 784 830 659 6V0_ 964 8K2 977 728 741 784 GREY SILVERADO 710 813 890 I 936 960 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 4:30-4:45 Pm Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 128 137 171 083 364 455 010 172 176 120 1.21 258 011 OW1 118 57%1 291 451 533 9X1 1A2 305 313 536 128 174 209 465 4N2 342 455 4F2 609 618 662 2M1 344 397 601 4K0 547 558 756 423 598 576 621 633 657 601 770, 780 914 6N2 749 935 944 951 - CI N52 973 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 4:45-5:00 Pm Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB 6/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 001 ``-+' 083 518 576 713' 024 053 075 075 172 210 OO4 162 42% 123 127 260 845 098 136 138 239 249 308 260 397 4V1 284 321 423 159 206 269 352 438 543UM 559 574 483 656 282 303 654 567 669 677 581 590 611 754 750 755 788 726 818 868 I=Mi.' 74i ;.x,. 875 846 HONDA LA WHT TRN VFW 756_ 875 BLACK NISSAN I 904 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 5-5:15 Pm Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru ES ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 217 234 252 909 065- 266 074 091 125 013 077 185 72% 918 473 528 632 258 269- 217 344 541 698 709 746- 395 520 3 E 1 466 574® 590 811 6TR 705 755 524 575 592 ',J 779 829 907 703 756 943 927 NIC 780 840 845 Location: ELUS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 5:15-5:30 Pm Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 053 106' 208 269- 034 095 099 OV1I.... 053 0M1 52% 064 083 448 669' 959' 068 068 166 100 131 152 103 226 236 ON1 131 150 171 294 361 198 217 279 251 165 203 424 464 467 347 399 421 369 442 489 511 541 439 534 548 491 515 516 466 523 546 674 6P1 626 761 765 523 604 770 774 774 708 812 949 785 824 875 818 925 973 979 952 916 933 979 ADO ADD C64 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 5:30-5:45 Pm Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB RIO Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 008 018 103 047• 706 OF2 134 ?, 008 055 087 034 MWitiMild63% t">3zA`" 144 196 237 348 105 133 229 263 313 3R1 1621T 395 422 423 275 322 344 %i3 435 462 435 4A1 511 443 484 4C2 378 395 502 581 724 556 652 698 535 575 650 649 724 799 769 802 808 935 667 670 758 840 816- 868 869 879 573 869 935 573 884 905 929 WXL 958 960 966 987 Location: ELLIS LANE SB NORTH OF MARSHALL STREET 5:45-6:00 Pm Entry Point:SB ELLIS LANE Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 072 150 138306 044 082 122 013 083 OF2 122 165 48% 165 412- 717_ 277 507 124 165 187 215 290 291 215 268 291 737 896 540 610 647 195 209 242 397 3A2 442 348 448 684 700 753 308 309 328 474 498 448 466 761 805 948 329 334 335 561 751 561 705 956 975 B05 340 378 384 784 866 922 780 879 925 141 437 449 455 948 DEF F18 STI 506 5T1 612 STT- 626 674 827 915 927 947 985 MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 7-7:15 am Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo Blvd 041 458 807 8XH 908 01.3 137 221 194 226 395 194 226 274 44% 691 730 320 429 605 395 730 943 281 754 774 778 7F2 552 587 593 873 979 730 788 911 975 CREVIER RED BMW Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 7:15-7:30 am Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo Blvd 11111MiedditeMmaammomaiimamormmirm IMMIIIIIIIM 11111=1111111:2g 90% MEI®MIIMMIEINIIIIE EOM 1111111111511111EMMEM®®®® 11111•=111111111133 milimmominumimmirm Ell= MEIMIIIM 1111111=11111111311 IIIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIII MZEI __�_�_I_M__�__ Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 7:30-7:45 am Exit Points %Cut MINIMMINIMMEI 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall Hondo Blvd • • O991=21;',;e,at>=MIS ®'®MMIMEMEOMEI M011 77% .'.111.E1 MEEIMIIIIIIIEMsr®'NIIIIM 272 288 291 115®MMID MIENEE --MMIME1®"' .; 323 162 MEI - .. ---IMISIIIIECLIIMI - 247 MEM 71. ---MICMINCEIMIMIIIIIIMIIIIES575 2,:1 MIEIMEI 11111111111111MEIMIELDIIIMIE MEM : --_����:: 89 ®� ® ,:'. MINIMM1111111131 M 808 810 MIIKEE11111MMICEO ---MZEII k 868 888 MEM MEI000 1111 MEM �r ���11�� MIIIIIM=IIM11111111111111111•1 =11111MINIIIIIIIMIIII I 958 Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 7:45-8:00 am Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo Blvd • •®IIIIIRS=IIIIIIISMICIZI 050 mon 014 024 MEE 83% .. - MM11® 132®11111111111131 ..- ME '' ����® A: ® 274 EOM S 1Il MET31111M11111110 365 h1Migli121®1=1:1=EZIMEM INIIIEIIIIMISIMMIMMEI =MEI IIIIIMERI®®®ME1111111113111MMEE 131111111111It=123 683 MEE MIES MENEM ®IIIIEM E®M01 4.1.1 646' 766® 528 ® 9X1 —11.131311111111EIMINEM ®=1:121M1111111110EMIS11111001111EM® --- 11111111:110 1 111111111:111MEI --_® ®_ -- — ------® 51 i311 -- IIIIM IM11112221 805 812— -- III _ ------MINIEMIIIME!III-- —__ ------ MMP ----- MI=--_—_ ®®------ ------MIMIIIIEMM—_—__- ---_--IIIIIIIISIE®------- Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 8-8:15 am Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WE ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall Hondo Blvd 102 233 364 008 019 109 064 102 196 71% 222 311 364 370' 411 155 221 295 111 119 269 275 311111 376 384 432' 617' 394 4 E2® 188 238 245 398 455 422 665 748• 796 5N1 604 622 293 376 384 543 562 868 570 648 787 946' 672 707 759 387_ 422 888 888 MKT 797 804 810 681 714 755 NNA 936 982 876 886 936® 936 939 Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 8:15-8:30 am Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo Blvd 0011.1. 1K2 005 2 E 0 309 069 139 OU1 240! .. 022 058 059 60% 240 264 ° _ 3391 623_ 744 296 305 307 307 312 412 01)1 139 156 601 615 SIR TOW TRUCK 319, 3391 352 570 607 -'- 189 203 240 398 417 603 878 9279611 279 282 312 933 648 653 322 335 677 694 810 412 453 570 854_ 976 586 5K2 607 ACE E18 141 679 707 708 773 928 AD12 Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 8:30-8:45 am Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall Hondo Blvd 025 452 654 053 053 034 118 034 097 112 60% 252 677' 717 OP2 143 213 2N2 326 258 274 212 351 772 7C2 7N2 299 212 411 329 395 279 293 351 411 414 418 827 EJC' 427 459 465 351 414 4L1 534 545 462 497 4N2 4N2 628 63 545 560 562 540 560 637 696 6V0 615 803 838 842 607 636 638 718 749 776 ,.._y. 933 933 982 D14 (ND 717 785 834 873 982 7918 X27 975 TCD - Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 8:45-9:00 am Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall Hondo Blvd -��; --` 025 194 350 058 OW1 139 _a.c,,_- ®' 3 88% 178 448 499 546 160 357 497 252 511 528 167 177 475 528 605 563 L39 603 614 617 605 629 511 528 629 755 BLUE STAR 704 755 802 923 569 577 629 834 902 917 1e3R 676 756 N52 805 U67 _ . Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 4-4:15 Pm Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena W8 E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1 On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall Hondo Blvd 008 038 118 122 316' 390 164 413 467'' 008 019 039 038 176 43% 120 205 533" 611• 671 503 SK2 122 5P1 9T0 368 L ' ziri 786 639 667 609 818 960 911 Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 4:15-4:30 Pm Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall _ Hondo Blvd 034 121 702' 198— 077 210 008 103 147 177 59% 305 323 344 282 296 2F2 147 1 E 2 323 142 318 481 368 3F2; 380 396 491 374 481 w,._.r= 637 817 637 540_ 512 551 829 877 887 8K2 T —` 936 659 6V0 728 877 964 J41 728 741 784 BLUE BLAZER 710 813 830 936 960 Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 4:30-4:45 Pm Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo Blvd 3A2 214 083 364 455 010 176 0367''477 282 120 121 60% -•_ - 273 282 483 533 9X1 lAi 305 313 344 575 483 536 567 442 452 575 342 455 4F2 633 652 662 609 662 611 642 4K0 547 558 1-t;, - e 576 621 633 756 991 756 887 904 770 780 914 BLUE BLAZER 948 F18 935 944 951 973 Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 4:45-5:00 Pm Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB RIO Rio Thru W8 ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo Blvd 075 129 518 576 713' 024 053 075 075 129 172 075 172 210 73% 172 206�7L, 845 098_ 138 203 239 258 239 249 308 282 159 206 269 442 483 352 543 414 `... . 303 654 582 567 677 788 830 887 726=En 868 825 846 HONDA LAWHT TRN I 869 904 983 I - Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 5-5:15 Pm Entry Point:W8 MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney ER W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB WO Marshall Hondo Blvd ,- ® 111:9 1 252 ® 70% ® --®M7. - +"Y?.� 249® 091® --_ 698 MEI 746ii -11111ESME11=1:211111•311 ::il:BMIIIIIIIIIIIIM IMIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIII�1111112SIMICEDIIIIICESIMMI=1 111•111•110 IIIMMIIIIIIMMIIIMIN Milli MIN MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 5:15-5:30 Pm Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru W8 ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Tills NB N/O Marshall Hondo Blvd 070 OVS 106• 208 269 024- 054 OV7. lad 095 099 OV1 75% 122 147 180 448 669• 959• 068 068 166 217 270 100 131 152 217 270 171 294 361 f71 198 294 424 464 347 399 42. 347 399 347 396 489 511 541. 43 ..i 548 467, 513 546 674 6P1 534 650 676 7617. 569 w - SO 708 812 949 L 765' 785 824 7855 824 875 662 .'.:-.Z..,,,,,,.788 952 869 916 933 824 869 1 Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 5:30-5:45 Pm Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Elia NB 5/0 Mar shall ''Hondo Blvd 055 305 047• 706 OF2 134 157 00r r----E055• OSSA 087 68% 196 260 196 237 348 , -.I 105 105 133 229 277 313 422 423 395 344 329 378 443 484 4C2 +, 616 656 662 378 502 506 61. 556' 698 575 650 808 935 929 960 670 758 835 929 816 845 868 948 884 905 929 958 960 966 987 Location: MARSHALL STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 5:45-6:00 Pm Entry Point:WB MARSHALL STREET Exit Points %Cut 4.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 3.On Ellis NB WO Marshall Hondo Blvd MENIIIIn 089 ®MM3®=" ®MMIIIMIEINIMEMICMINICEBM:119 77% 412 481 min 198 277 507 MEI 171 124 ME 334s r'--- 684 ® 322 , '; OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 7-7:15 am Entry Point:ER OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB WO Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 252 320 807 8XH7 194 226 395 194 226 274 035 103 38% 778 832 395 730 943 281 395 395 128 208 316 947 996 552 587 593 366 614 648 730 788 911 860 970 975 CREVIER RED BMW Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 7:15-7:30 am Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru ER ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall E8 W/O TCBLVD 4N2 027 150 304 024 041 052 024 041 052 001 013 025 60% 720 873 363 618 720 086 136 217 135 213 317 089 102 207 752 780 817 329 346 376 329 329 344 291 348 399 988 473 506 511 365 473 482 541 524 550 658 506 608 658 730 773 780 691 707 739 689 754 764 954 754 764 961 849 961 989 U t u L e r' g H o M Q C Oa-CC CC N N N a 0 C M N N UI Ln 0 •C .. Vl 0 Ln C C1 I- O Lr Lo LD 0 h a Lo .-i LD a h N M C CD CD N a Vt > 0 - -,, ,,, , , . ,..0 , Ct CD m u u r- I-- 0 N o N LD.a.VI N Cl O 0 C LD CO N LO C LD sr, LD m .-1 N C Ln t0 I a C1 m p N 0 M C VI LD LD h CO C1 W .a n L L If al /0 MN�r1 M h al C rO tO LD to C .-L •--t N C h Dl N 00 Y N .-L Vl N O N 00 0 W N = CC .-. C1 LD M Z p .. cr N h CO Cl 0 0 N Cr; M Lf LD LO a C1 C C L o o C - .-4, Cl Lo N N O h LD 0 0 C M a Cl N C In '- sit N If V1 C X C C h O Vl 00 00 O Lb 00 00 Ln -. .-. 00 M '- 0C C1 .- h CC N N N M Crl M C LD LD h CO Cl 0 .--i N N M C CD h Cr Cl CC 0 2 00 W W CO CO 01 N CO h N Cl LD N CO LD h Vl 00 > C a C a .. M In M Q1 (..1W M 00 C CC .. a LD lD N N N Ln > N C h N 0 CO Lo LC M Z ra - 0 .. N N M M C V1 lD h a Cl C a o .. NI M Cr LD N- a Cl Y C.,• C c O CJ 0 nJ ro r -O = t O C C1 .0 ‘.0D N h C LO C to LD C 0 a N Cl CI C C LI) 00 N--N M O LD M N O . .-4 LC C h O VI vl .. O h 0 C •s OCC MCc - to a O M M CC C p .. N N M m C Ln LD h CO Cl Q C p N M N C I. am Cl H p 0, 0 • c M C M o 0 a Cl .-i Cl LO Lo L Cl o N Cl C , C1 11-... Lo C C co Cl C Ql N e-1 h N CO .'. C ii Cl N M .-I Cl W M L% _ N N MDI al LD LD CO 01 E W = 0 N M to LD a C1 17 L t Gr cO L O a C1 M h a 0 00 a Cl C M LO C N N Vl M 0 C co .. N C O LD O 00 00 0 al 0C co op LLD to M u. .-1 N M Vl Ln LD LC a CO Cl \ 0 .. N D CO Cl 2 Z Z co co Z Z W N N LO LD LD C h N a .. 11 W 0 CC L'1 , NO Vl - p 0 N 0M C UI 0 CC N COiVD Oc u-, .C, N N Lam!) N Cl m N N W h N W N N M Cl M N M .--- LD • D Ln M D LC N Cl .. Cl Ll .-1 NLD CO Z p N Cl Z C N N C C VI LD N a N Q CC > CC Q u Q u O 4- 0 r- C 0 o a C 0 h N M al M • CO LD C N Z C LD Z .-N N a h VI CO LD N C O 7J .. co C .. N N C C N Lo N CO CO 2 CO CD LA O W 0 W u u LL C Lt C p M CI DNI 0 p — CC CC CC CO .N. N CC C CCi I- C Q MCI N C p N M C VC LD 1 LO Cl a Q 0 Q 0 n D h W .-1 W I-- r- W W W C 00 Lo CC N VI LD Cl VI .I y J y r- W W W Z Z W J _ VI; : 1 LD G I N RI C t0 Ln LD NI Ln O CC a Q o a Q •-1 alt0 O r0 N o `-- c o c c J - W J N W Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 8-8:15 am Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney ES W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 124 134 237 222 233 364 064 067 102 067 125 196 036 045 099 17% 499 528 605 370' 372 411 111 119 125 269 275 376 104 119 129 6E2 718- 432' 516 617' 188 238 245 398 419 455 178 227 250 785 810 878 665 748' 796 293 376 384 543 562 868 321 348 350 841 946' 387 419 422 888 888 MKT 439 460 462 681 714 755 NNA 511 5N1 608 793 847 609 6 E 2 6G1 708 786 890 899 947 9N5 T93 Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 8:15-8:30 am Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 299 374 005 2 E 0 309 OU1 240 279 022 058 059 036 091 109 20% 4L1 562 677 623 692 744 307 312 412 OU1 139 156 139 192 737 W..._: 8V1 SIR TOW TRUCK 570 607 773 189 203 240 262 406 407 909 878 927 962 279 2B2 312 422 540 570 315 322 335 611 727 412 453 570 841 914 586 5K2 607 WHT TRUCK 679 707 708 773 927 928 AD12 Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 8:30-8:45 am Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru ER ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB NM Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD it 465 124 452 654 034 118 135 034 097 112 148 282 38% 607 8D1 677' 717 739 177 2N2 326 177 258 274 372 417 497 ACE 1.39 772 7C2 7N2 329 336 395 279 293 351 4N2 555 827 EX" 351 414 4L1 534 545 560 615 654 545 560 562 597 658 766 6M1 785 808 597 61.5 658 803 838 842 810 982 766 751 933 933 982 014 982 Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 8:45-9:00 am j Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 428 459 25 194 350 005 131 205 005 078 131 052 168 111 22% 499 `+ '11''668 6P2 448 499 546 252 511 528 167 177 475 222 284 291 879 990 563 L39 565 605 629 511 528 565 294 314 368 BLUE GLENDALE FORD BLUE STAR 684 846 923 569 577 629 378 442 I<3R 676 755 923 495-r". - 7N1 954 ACE N96 Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 44:15 Pm Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.Ort De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru ER ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 140 1 E2 368 122 316' 390 008 019 039 038 176 . 209 034 281 308 43% 528 533 c.-.. 533' 611' 122 209 5P1 374 910 310 315 368 581 639 827 401 448 481 753 756 854 960 670 682 810 T98 6WD 756 780 851 867 Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 4:15-4:30 Pm Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 140 2M1 121 702• T98 008 118 103 147 177 147 312 341 40% 2VO 465 147 1 E 2 323 1A2 318 481 419 523, 523 831 863 374 481 4B1 4B1 637 817 580 5K2 818 929 551 572 783 829 877 887 863 977 F18 877 956 964 BLUE BLAZER Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 4:30-4:45 Pm Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru ES ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD OV1 122 083 364 036 273 282 120 121 258 OL1 118 50% 182 483 533 9X1 344 575 618 483 536 567 128 174 576 657 633 652 662 609 618 662 2M1 344 397 877 702 715 726 756 423 441 598 756 991 630 657 6D1 BLUE BLAZER 6N2 763 I 811 N52 Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 4:45-5:00 Pm Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points __ %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/O TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD k. 013 071 518 576 713' 075 129 172 075 172 210 022 41% 076 171 845 203 239 258 239 249 308 260 252 361 438 442 483 352 438 543 508 574 3R1- 500 582 669 757 567 669 677 581 590 611 516 818 830 887 983 726E 818 868 662 741 756 845 T40 VFW TRN VFW 756 840 875 904 Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 5-5:15 Pm Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru ER ENTRY 1.On Olney ER W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB WO Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 271 285 234 252 909 074 152 249 074 091 125 013 077 185 54% 544 ,u m,.1.:; 316 318 332 258 269 318 217_ 239 731 756 428 493 537 318 395 520 3 E 1 442 466 797 555 562 705 6TR 705 755 524 575 960 745 761 776 779 829 907 703- 756 825 869 894 927 NIC 757 840 845 846 NNA Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 5:15-5:30 Pm Entry Point:ER OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru EB ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 034 036 OKS 106' 208 269 OV1 131 180 095 099 OV1 019 053 OM1 33% 140 170 219 448 669' 959' 216 217 270 100 131 152 103 226 236 '`� 272 279 2M1 198 217 279 306 329 540 706 347 399 421 347 399 421 342 369 456 439 427 439 534 548 491 r ' 516 534 566 650 626 761 765 523 770 765 785 824 785 824 875 818 826 925 869 926 958 916 933 936 979 ADO CM Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HOND0 AVENUE 5:303:45 Pm Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru E8 ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 189047' 706 008 32 55 008 055 087 034 129 246 43% 288 2M1 ... ,µ397 070 105 192 105 133 229 313 3R1 455 479 493 378 395 535 r7.'. 322 344 411 435 462 528 649 616- 662 378 395 502 516 616 667 769 833 535 575 650 :- 724 799 929 960 667 670 758 7L1 830 830 816 845 868 869 879 573 884 905 929 958 960 966 987 Location: OLNEY STREET EAST OF RIO HONDO AVENUE 5:45-6:00 Pm Entry Point:EB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru ER ENTRY 1.On Olney EB W/0 TCBLVD 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 010 027 109 138 171 306 013 083 129 013 083 OF2 122 134 165 29% 138_-. -. 481- 144 171. 195- 165 187 21.5 291 316 319 737 896 209 260 299 195 209 242 397 407 415 322 329 329 308 309 328 447 474 498 422 440 334 335 363 329 334 335 561 6W1 751 511 582 654 437 479 506 340 378 384 784 866 922 773 896 594 610 612 437 449 455 948 DEF F18 917 935 975 626 724 754 506 5T1 612 STT <368 816 827 908 626 674 827 944 948 915 927 947 BLK GENTLY 985 OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD • Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 7-7:15 am Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB RIO Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 01.3 7F2 013 137 221 194 226 395 194 226 274 035 075 103 100% 8.77 320 429 605 395 730 943 281 395 395 128 208 316 778 7F2 996 552 587 593 366 614 648 873 979 730 788 911 756 860 970 975 CREVIER RED BMW Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 7:15-7:30 am Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WE ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB WO Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 086 419 511 071 051 116 024 041 052 024 041 052 001 013 025 91% 680 156 160 274 086 136 217 135 213 317 089 102 207 760 780 927 361 390 406 329 346 376 329 329 344 291 348 399 944 LOS 419 451 458 473 506 511 365 473 482 541 674 713 533 648 680 524 550 658 506 608 658 730 773 780 743 691 707 739 689 754 764 954 760 780 821 754 764 961 849 961 989 8T1 909 925 929 944 949 WHT BMW NP _ O M < to 0 CO - K C .o-. .'-1 N O In C1 C1 1.- M o to t0 N- 0o NI m F- O N O 1h. to Ct �l1 N O1 N 00 h .-t tO 1.17 OC .7- Ln tD N 00 Cr, t0 to N .-t to C1 h LI C CO L/1 rsl .-1 o Lft l7 h OC Cl O C O .-+ Ot vt N N O h to 0 0 o r1 00 0 N N m m Q 0 CO CO rn t p 0 m 3 Q1 N C1 h N L1 h co tD h V1 co 00 o 0.p a m ti oo 00 l0 l0 N N N tf1 n p N N to tO o u1 tD N oo Ol c c u O U t0 N t- Q t7 C .1 to C O 03 N ti .ti o h o v 2 _ p .. N N rn rt o Vl t0 h 0o Cl O s rn O Cl .0 C1 tD .ft to m O N C 0. o al N .-1 h N 00 N N r1 to J` 1.0 LC OC C1 < W •r- -77c L 10 O• O o0 Ol m N W O 0o 0o CT o W O tD O 0o 0o Z .-1 N r1 0o Co Ql to 2 N N t0 t0 tO o h N CO N L1 C h h 0 0o o O tlt h t0 tD 0 O O N (0 o n to .3 h 00 Cl 1- N O < tI) tO H 0CN V OC 01 W JN N ,nto to OIC QN1 J O O U 5 • tit mo C o N o v1 n 01 Q1 2 m c 0 0 N to v >- UI la Ca 01 rn 0 N L.1.1 CC M 00 ♦ IV N 01 Cn } W W O }• > 0 !i N Lt1 z = to Ci ZN ,,tl:J Ql p W E 3 rtl LnC N 0 C. r' c a O N-1 N o O 171 C R c3 m o n w Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 7:45-8:00 am Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD OP2 164• 013 OP2 050 093 099 014 024 119 026 050 051 84% - 262 2A2 132 134 187 148 186 227 144 148 212 086 118 152 305 -==344 189 209 Mani 245 284 335 235 274 284 205 '- lial 262 525• 237 285 2A2 375 401 514 318 328 335 284 306 308 551 562 567• `",± •>•,i.,,i-'gyp ' 374 547 662 694 361 401 477 331 348 376 581 5N1 619 376 422 770 865 868 483 683 685 3H1 447 484 619 646' 438 492 915 933 939 700 755 797 4U1 546 553 528 546 551 981 M.C. 836 863 915 581 604 612 794' 562 501 604 933 939 975 612 626 662 607 619 619 9112 KNG M84 694 725 Sl'"7' 9H2 A28• 644 718 915 923 734 735 935 975 755 784 -- : MN2 785 805 812 832 854 862 899 942 947 998 C10 141 Entry-cars denoted with•made a U turn to go back to TCBLVD to get on Freeway Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 8:00-8:15 am Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/0 TCBLVD 008 064 067 102 067 125 196 036 045 099 83% 370• 432* 4 E2 155 221 111 119 125 269 275 376 104 119 129 617• "''4707 394 4 E2=MEI 188 238 245 398 419 455 178 227 250 748' '77 ; 5N1 604 293 376 384 543 562 868 321 348 35D 810 854 886 672•`•• r- ;« 387 419 422 888 888 MKT 439 460 462 936 946' 797 810 681 714 755 NNA 511 5N1 608 876 - • , 793 847 609 6 E 2 6G1 936 939 979 708 756 786 890 899 947 9NS T93 Entry-cars denoted with•made a U turn to go back to TCBLVD to get on Freeway Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 8:15-8:30 am Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru W8 ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB NM Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 069 OP2 139 069 096 139 0U1 240 279 022 058 059 036 091 109 80% 143 296 305 307 307 312 412 OU1 139 156 139 192 1E2 417 603 816 319 339- 570 607 773 189 203 240 262 406 407 +x'E18 'IMM417 603 878 927 962 279 282 312 422 540 570 627 648 653 315 322 335 611 727 810 677 694 810 412 453 570 841 914 854 899 976 586 5K2 607 WHT TRUCK ACE '`a': 141 679 707 708 773 927 928 AD12 Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 8:30-8:45 am Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB NM Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 386 Ali, 033 053 053 034 118 135 034 097 112 148 210 282 69% 546 611 OP2 143 213 177 2N2 326 177 258 274 372 417 677' 299 212 411 329 336 395 279 293 351 4N2 511 555 785 834 EIC•._...' 465 351 414 4L1 534 545 560 615 654 693 X12 4N2 636 545 560 562 597 658 766 6M1 785 808 6V0 597 615 658 803 838 842 810 982 718 749 776 766 7S1 933 933 982 D14 785 834 873 982 918 X27 BLK BMW CREVIER Entry-cars denoted with•made a U turn to go back to TCBLVD to get on Freeway Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 8:45-9:00 am Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 284 297 058 OWl 139 005 131 205 005 078 131 052 168 1T1 80% 612 160 357 497 252 511 528 167 177 475 222 284 291 834 805 7,::« "7.-, 565 605 629 511 528 565 294 314 368 U67 704 755 684 846 923 569 577 629 378 396 442 834 902 917 K3R 676 755 923 495 668 7N1 805 U67 954 ACE N96 Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 4-4:15 Pm Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena W8 E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 008 ''`"'--'i 306 °' M,,„. 008 019 039 038 176 209 034 281 308 46% 316• 5K2 122 209 SP1 374 9T0 310 315 368 533• 639 667 827 448 481 611° 6W0" ' 854 N:-,,-F-1161) 556 670 682 9K2 6WD 756 780 851 867 Entry-cars denoted with'made a U turn to go back to TCBLVD to get on Freeway Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 4:15-4:30 Pm Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/O Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD "077 065 t,''''''',-:'077 210 008 118 118 103 147 177 147 312 341 64% 314 369 2F2 147 1 E2 323 1A2 318 481 419 476 523 455 M311 396 374 481 481 4B1 637 817 580 51(2 818 702° 540 566 5J2 551 572 783 829 877 887 863 977 F18 `7. 659 877956 964 728 784 BLUE BLAZER 710 813 830 936 960 Entry-cars denoted with•made a U turn to go back to TCBLVD to get on Freeway Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 4:30-4:45 Pm Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB WO Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 176 1L2 313 010 172 176 036 273 282 120 121 258 OL1 OW1 118 90% ‘ur1A2 305 313 344 575 618 483 536 567 128 174 209 4K2 342 455 652 662 609 618 662 2M1 344 • 770 4K0 702 715 726 756 423 441 598 576 621 756 991 630 657 6D1 951 973 770 BLUE BLAZER 6N2 749 763 991 951 811 N52 973 Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 4:45-5:00 Pm Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB WO Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall ER W/O TCBLVD 024 075 024 075 075 129 172 075 172 210 004 022 162 73% •':' .. 136 138 203 239 258 239 249 308 260 397 4V1 2M1 206 438 442 483 352 438 543 508 559 574 713" 746 282 654 582 669 757 567 669 677 581 590 611 846 964 750 755.. 830 887 983 726 818 868 662 741 756 846 VFW TRN VFW 756 840 875 904 Entry-cars denoted with.made a U turn to go back to TCBLVD to get on Freeway Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 5-5:15 Pm Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB WO Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 01(5 237 266 074 152 249 074 091 125 013 077 185 60% 890 952 528 632 316 318 332 258 269 318 217 237 239 698 709 746 428 493 537 318 395 520 3 E1 442 466 811 555 705 61-11 705 755 524 575 592 745 761 776 779 829 907 703 750 756 825 869 894 927 NIC 757 780 840 846 NNA Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 5:15-5:30 Pm Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points 96 Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/O Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 068 068 106' 024 034 054 OV1 131 180 095 099 OV1 019 053 0M1 67% 188 424 068 068 216 217 270 100 131 152 103 226 236 464 171 294 361 272 279 2M1 198 217 279 251 306 329 561 669' 424 464 467 347 399 421 347 399 421 342 369 456 674 698 6P1 541 429 439 427 439 534 548 491 515 516 959' 674 6P1 534 566 650 626 761 765 523 604 770 812 949 765 785 824 785 824 875 818 826 925 952 869 926 958 916 933 936 979 ADO Entry-cars denoted with•made a U turn to go back to TCBLVD to get on Freeway Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 5:30-5:45 Pm Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/0 Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olne WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4,On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 047' 157 008 032 055 008 055 087 034 129 246 80% 196 2371' 348 070 105 192 105 133 229 263 313 3R1 s 4C2 395 422 _ _, -.. 378 395 535 275 322 344 411 435 462 633 732- ---464 4C2 616 656 662 378 395 502 516 581 616 816 846 652 698 667 769 833 535 575 650 649 724 799 935 929 960 667 670 758 7L1 816 845 868 869 879 573 884 905 929 WXL 958 960 966 987 Entry-cars denoted with•made a U turn to go back to TCBLVD to get on Freeway Location: OLNEY STREET WEST OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD 5:45-6:00 Pm Entry Point:WB OLNEY STREET Exit Points %Cut 3.On De Adalena WB E/O Rio Thru WB ENTRY 1.on Olney WB E/0 Rio Hondo 2.On Ellis NB N/0 Marshall Hondo 4.On Marshall EB W/O TCBLVD 128 122 013 083 129 013 083 0E2 122 134 165 85% 184 198® 144 171 195 124 165 187 215 290 291 540 647 209 260 299 195 209 242 397 3A2 442 776 956 _.77.1 753 322 329 329 308 309 328 447 474 805 761 805 948 334 335 363 329 334 335 561 6W1 751 956 .hY•75 BOS 437 479 506 340 378 384 784 866 922 141 594- 612 437 449 455 948 DEF F18 626 724 754 506 511 612 STT <368 816 827 908 626 674 827 944 948 915 927 947 BLK GENTLY 985 TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOUR AVERAGE DAILY COUNTS Prepared by National Data&Surveying Service, VOLUME De Adalena St W/O Ellis Ln Day:Tuesday City:Rosemead Date:6/11/2019 Project 4:CA19 5399_007 DAILY TOTALS NB 58 LB w6 Total 0 0 953 1.016 1,969 AM Pcnod NB tiii [fi WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 1 0 1 12:00 18 10 28 00:15 0 2 2 12:15 12 11 23 00:30 1 1 2 12:30 10 16 26 00:45 0 2 2 5 2 7 12:45 11 S1 7 44 18 95 01:00 2 1 3 13:009 18 27 01:15 1 0 1 13:15 13 13 26 01:30 2 2 4 13:30 14 10 24 01:45 0 5 1 4 I 9 13:45 24 60 20 61 44 121 02:00 1 2 3 14:00 14 21 '35 02:15 0 0 0 14:15 18 21 39 02:30 0 0 0 14:30 19 27 46 02:45 0 1 0 2 0 3 14:45 11 62 21 90 32 152 03:00 0 0 0 15:00 13 19 32 03:15 0 1 1 15:15 16 22 38 03:30 0 0 0 15:30 11 15 26 03:45 0 1 2 1 2 15:45 15 55 18 74 33 129 04:00 0 0 0 16:00 17 16 33 04:15 1 0 1 16:15 11 20 31 04:30 1 0 1 16:30 8 21 29 04:45 0 2 1 1 1 3 16:45 24 60 16 73 40 133 05:00 1 4 5 17:00 23 13 36 05:15 4 3 7 17:15 22 12 34 05:30 4 4 8 17:30 28 18 46 05:45 2 11 4 15 6 26 17,45 30 103 27 70 57 173 06:00 5 2 7 18:00 15 29 44 06:15 8 0 8 18:15 15 18 33 06:30 7 1 8 18:30 21 22 43 06:45 5 25 4 7 9 32 18:45 16 67 25 94 41 161 07:00 13 2 15 19:00 14 25 r 39 07:15 24 7 31 19:15 20 17 37 07:30 31 16 47 19:30 10 18 28 07:45 46 114 28 53 74 167 19:45 7 51 19 79 26 130 08:00 17 21 38 20:00 12 15 27 08:15 17 11 28 20:15 6 12 18 08:30 18 13 31 20:30 11 18 29 08:45 12 64 9 54 21 118 20:45 11 40 18 63 29 103 09:00 3 7 10 21:00 11 17 28 09:15 11 10 21 21:15 7 11 18 09:30 12 9 21 21:30 10 11 21 09,45 _ 5 31 11 37 16 68 21,45 7 35 12 51 19 86 10:00 7 14 21 22:00 4 11 15 10:15 13 5 18 2215 3 10 13 10:30 7 13 20 22:30 3 2 5 10:45 13 40 6 38 19 78 22,45 4 14 10 33 14 47 _ 11:00 13 7 20 23:00 2 5 7 11:15 16 9 25 23:15 2 3 5 11:30 11 23 34 2330 1 6 7 11:45 12 52 10 49 22 101 23:45 3 8 3 17 6 25 TOTALS 347 267 614 TOTALS 606 749 1355 SPLIT% 56.5% 43.5% 31.2% SPUT% 44.7% 55.3% 68.8% DAILY TOTALS NB 58 I EB w6 Total 0 0 953 1,016 1,969 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:15 PM Peak Hour 17:00 17:45 17.15 AM Pk Volume 118 76 190 PM Pk Volume 103 96 181 Pk Hr Factor 0.641 0.679 0.642 Pk Hr Factor 0.858 0.828 0.794 7.9 Volume 178 107 285 4-6 Volume 163 143 306 7.9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:15 4-6 Peak Nuur 17.00 16:00 17:00 7-9 Pk Volume 118 76 190 4-6 Pk Volume 103 73 173 Pk Hr Factor 0641 0 679 0.642 Pk Hr Factor 7858 0.869 0.759 Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Project #: CA19_5399_007 City: Rosemead Location: De Adalena St W/O Ellis Ln Date: 6/11/2019 120 NR SR FR WR 100 80 LeiCU t 60 )111 v 40 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . O 0 M R l0 ID C) Cr; O .-� N M 111 C.6I� GO 6l O N M O0 0 O O O0 O O O 1-1 .--i •-+ � N fN N N Prepared by Nat.cnal Data&Surveying Serv.cea VOLUME Ellis Ln S/O Marshall St Day:Tuesday City:Rosemead Date:6/11/2019 Protect 4:CA19,5399_006 DAILY TOTALS NB 5B EB WB 1 Total I 571 478 0 0 1,049 AM Period NB 511 EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 2 1 3 12:00 7 7 14 00:15 1 0 1 12:15 2 6 8 00:30 1 0 1 12:30 6 5 11 00:45 0 4 1 2 1 6 12:45 8 23 5 2 i 13 46 01:00 0 1 1 13:00 8 4 12 01:15 2 0 2 13:15 8 12 20 01:30 0 0 0 13:30 4 9 13 01:45 0 2 0 1 0 3 13:45 9 29 4 29 _ 13 58 02:00 0 0 0 14:00 12 8 20 02:15 0 0 0 14:15 12 6 18 02:30 0 0 0 14:30 3 5 8 02:45 0 0 0 14:45 6 33 8 27 14 60 03:00 0 0 0 15:00 12 9 21 03:15 0 0 0 15:15 8 7 15 03:30 1 0 1 15:30 9 4 13 03:45 1 2 0 I 2 15:45 12 41 10 30 22 71 04:00 1 0 1 16:00 7 4 11 04:15 1 1 2 16:15 10 10 20 04:30 1 1 2 16:30 10 7 17 04:45 1 4 0 2 1 6 16:45 10 37 10 3120 68 05:00 2 2 4 17:00 9 11 20 05:15 5 1 6 17:15 9 10 19 05:30 2 2 4 17:30 9 11 20 05:45 4 13 0 5 4 18 17:45 13 40 9 41 22 81 06:00 4 2 6 16:00 9 5 14 06:15 7 5 12 18:15 13 7 20 06:30 6 3 9 18:30 8 10 18 06:45 7 24 3 13 10 37 18:45 12 42 7 29 19 71 07:00 7 2 9 19:00 13 8 - 21 07:15 11 12 23 19:15 6 6 12 07:30 8 5 13 19:30 6 5 11 07:45 9 35 20 39 29 74 19:45 10 35 3 22 13 57 08:00 17 13 30 20:00 10 8 18 08:15 4 10 14 20:15 9 4 13 08:30 10 7 17 20:30 7 4 11 08:45 7 38 12 42 19 80 20:45 3 29 6 22 9 51 09:00 11 9 --._... 20 21:00 7 3 _.-._..._. 10 09:15 7 6 13 21:15 6 5 11 09:30 8 7 15 21:30 1 3 4 09:45 4 30 5 27 9 57 21:45 5 19 2 13 7 32 10:00 9 5 14 22:00 6 8 14 10:15 7 5 12 22:15 5 4 9 10:30 5 7 12 22:30 2 3 5 10:45 11. 32 11 28 22 60 22:45 5 18 4 14 9 37 __. 11:00 6 6 12 23:00 1 2 3 11:15 6 5 11 23:15 4 5 9 11:30 6 5 11 23:30 5 4 9 11:45 11 29 5 21 16 50 23:45 2 12 1 12 3 24 TOTALS 213 180 393 TOTALS 358 298 656 SPLIT% 54.2% 45.8% 37.5% SPLIT% 54.6% 45.4% 62.5% DAILY TOTALS NB SBI Ea WB 1 10541 571 478 0 0 1,049 AM Peak Hooe 07:15 07:15 01115 PM Peak Hour 18:15 16.45 17:00 AM Pk Volume 45 50 95 PM Pk Volume 46 41 81 Pk Hr Factor 0.651 0.625 0.792 P6 Hr Factor 0.985 0.955 0.920 1-9 Volume 73 81 154 4.6 Valente 77 72 149 7-9 Peak Hour 07:15 07.15 07:15 4.6 Peek Hour 17:00 16:45 17:00 7.9 Pk Volume 45 50 95 4-6 Pk Volume 40 42 81 Pk Hr Factor 0.502 0.625 0,792 Pk Hr rector 0.769 0.955 0,922 Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Project#: CA19_5399_006 City: Rosemead Location: Ellis Ln S/0 Marshall St Date: 6/11/2019 45 NB .SB SES AWB 40 PI\ 35 30 u 25 t rL > 20 15 10 5 0 p p p p O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .-1 N rn V Cri CO r W Cr, O N N in O /n N rIl O O O O O O O O O 0 r+ - rl .-1 N ti - - - N N N N N Prepared by National Data&Surveying Sevkes VOLUME Marshall St W/O Temple City Blvd Day:Tuesday City:Rosemead Date:6/11/2019 Project 8:CA19 5399_005 DAILY TOTALS NB 58 I EB WB Total 0 0 1,392 1.161 2,553 AM Period N(3 SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:002 4 6 12:00 17 22 39 00:15 32 5 12:15 11 10 21 00:30 3 2 5 12:30 17 9 26 00:45 1 9 2 1.0 3 19 12:45 16 61 13 54 29 115 01:00 2 2 4 13:00 24 7 31 01:15 33 5 13:15 16 18 34 01:30 01 1 13:30 11 12 23 01:45 4 9 2 7 6 16 13:45 24 75 23 60 _ 47 135 02:00 3 2 5 14:00 28 12 40 02:15 01 1 14:15 17 12 29 02:30 0 0 0 14:30 21 18 39 02:45 1 4 1 4 2 8 14:45 17 83 14 56 31 139 03:001 1 2 15:00 26 23 49 03:15 0 0 0 15:15 27 21 48 03:301 0 1 15:30 24 20 44 03:45 1 3 0 1 1 4 15:45 26 103 30 94 56 197 04:00 4 1 5 16:00 19 23 42 04:152 1 3 16:15 22 23 45 04:301 1 2 16:30 16 17 33 04:45 3 10 0 3 3 13 16:45 20 77 33 91 53 173 05:00 5 0 5 17:00 24 36 60 05:15 6 4 10 17:15 21 38 59 05:30 9 4 13 17:30 20 40 60 05:45 16 36 2 I..: 18 46 17:45 36 101 33 :4:_ 69 248 06:00 9 2 11 18:00 28 22 50 06:15 9 5 14 18:15 20 25 45 06:30 6 11 17 18:30 23 18 41 06:45 7 31 6 24 13 55 18:45 28 99 13 78 , 41 177 07:00 16 7 23 19:00 32 14 46 07:15 16 16 32 19:15 20 14 34 07:30 24 27 51 19:30 23 12 35 07:45 33 89 29 79 62 168 19:45 28 103 12 52 40 155 08:00 27 19 46 20:00 20 11 31 08:15 19 26 45 20:15 15 17 32 08:30 22 10 32 20:30 17 18 35 08:45 21 89 25 80 46 169 20:45 17 69 16 62 33 131 09:00 20 17 37 21:00 17 9 26 09:15 17 7 24 21:15 14 16 30 0930 13 9 22 21:30 11 14 25 09:45 21 71 16 49 37 120 21:45 18 60 9 48 27 108 10:00 17 9 26 22:00 11 6 17 10:15 17 12 29 22:15 13 3 16 10:30 16 14 30 22:308 7 15 10:45 14 64 17 52 31 116 _ 22:45 11 43 7 23 18 66 11:00 13 15 28 23:008 7 15 11:15 13 14 27 23:15 9 8 17 11:30 23 6 29 23306 3 9 11:45 25 74 14 49 39 123 23:45 6 79 5 23 11 52 TOTALS 489 368 857 TOTALS 903 793 1696 SPLIT% 57.1% 42.9% 33.5% SPLIT% 53.2% 46.8% 66.4% DAILY TOTALS NB se I EB WB Total 0 0 1,392 1,161 2,553 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 PM Peak Hour 17:45 16:45 17:00 AM Pk Volume 103 101 204 PM Pk Volume 107 147 248 Pk Hr Factor 0.780 0.871 0.823 Pk Fir Factor 0.743 0.919 0.899 7.9 Volume 178 159 337 4•6 Volume 178 243 421 7.9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 4-6 Peak Hour 17.00 16:45 17.00 7.9 Pk Volume 103 101 204 4-6 Pk Volume 101 147 248 Pk Hr Factor 0.780 0.871 0.823 Pk Hr Factor 0 701 0.919 0.899 Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Project#: CA19_5399_0O5 City: Rosemead Location: Marshall St W/O Temple City Blvd Date: 6/11/2019 160 .NB �S5 SEB 140 120 100 • 0 8 CIJ 1\‘‘41 60 40 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O .4 N M C V1 t0 n W en O �� N M cI 6-, 66 n fA ai O .-i N M O O O O O O O O O O N N N N m mmnn mry omm8 m arvSm � ,1. 'oO " i a wrmmmamm Nvm. rvrvn... . mn 2 m On b ,y 0 0 N O P. 8-4.8-. ', ^ o 0 3 1000'4r0i4....H'Dnrv.vmnnmmr..,'..-...n.. .-.. ...m.�2.nn.,,,..e,..-- o m li;v s a < .o tg I a v n N v .. a m g n U 1 W m .. .... '4224:.2:?...m-i 4.-iere..yrv=rv..r.. g.ym.pi.. mm.<..-mN O L- = N 3 'I 3' 0 z p e V W r 'EOnONO»ONOr,ONe ONO N'ON O NpN NgNTNONONO HMf q4O e Q X W ^ _ ? c Z 0 rvryrymmmm mi,n,mnvl ....R 'RZP." v,o..mmoob•actA :4 $ 4i R _ � O � eo00 u:I.ri b P1�PI�O<G eCm Ci ei ei O�OCOOn.iwnMNi.iN wi rri nim O „ � O a r 0 N o 0 mO vT O ry .ryp. ROOrv000 .00Nm mnmryw,=.n mto p C ry - m .. m ,m..i mooc n On nl ^ b o 0 0 0 z O 3 000rvoo_oo rvo..000..O00'0 J1ry0 ,,, mmmry1,4N v 14,9 �.rv.eov.^,.��ry 0^, = O TyTy n N " '0 m ... r m2 m IVm o v 0.' N o o mo m .+rvn.-0.-.m 000.-,..000000rvOfnm..rvmv mn Nv ,.. n mm.mNm2tim,y,4 - J N m I- 0 J } }C Q A l 0 m Q ? T u 0 = ? o ? o a i.'o.N.�<S+5 80.'",wa8.N.,?,: w4.sr.wr,s'"2a .N.8B4mr,.84m;s.N.m.484 g, a - +,1 131. �ss8sssssooo ooaooasaaoaoogooo ssos000oos o : �a � = Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Project#: CA19_5399_002 City: Rosemead Location: Olney St E/O Rio Hondo Ave Date: 6/11/2019 140 �N1 SB EB WB 120 - 100 80 — -- v L 60 - \ 40 20 )IFF 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 H. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O —1 N M [Y V1 lD n op Ol O r1 N M [Y Cr; lD 66 at; O N m - -- O O O O o O O O O O N N N Prepared by Nauonal Data 6 Surveying Service, VOLUME Onley St W/O Temple City Blvd Day:Tuesday City:Rosemead Date:6/11/2019 Protect 4:CA19_5399_003 DAILY TOTALS NB SB I EB WB Total 0 0 386 813 1,199 AM Prrwd NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB 58 1 L WB TOTAL 00:00 0 1 1 12:00 2 15 17 00:15 0 1 1 12:15 7 5 12 00:30 0 1 1 12:30 2 4 6 00:45 1 1 0 _ 1 4 12:45 4 15 6 - 10 45 01:00 1 0 1 13:00 4 8 12 01:15 1 0 1 13:15 6 / 13 01:30 2 0 2 13:30 7 10 17 01:45 0 4 0 0 4 13:45 4 21 13 38 17 59 02:00 0 0 0 14:00 8 13 21 02:15 0 1 1 14:15 4 15 19 02:30 0 0 0 14:30 8 13 21 02:45 1 1 0 1 2 14:45 11 31 14 55 25 86 03:00 1 0 1 15:00 3 21 24 03:15 1 0 1 15:15 8 16 24 03:30 1 0 1 15:30 3 16 19 03:45 0 3 1 1 1 4 15:45 4 18 22 75 26 93 04:00 1 0 1 16:00 3 13 16 04:15 2 1 3 16:15 3 14 17 04:30 3 0 3 16:30 4 13 17 04:45 3 9 1 2 4 11 16:45 4 14 24 64 28 78 05:00 5 3 8 17:00 7 23 30 05:15 3 2 5 17:15 7 25 32 05:30 7 1 8 17:30 7 29 36 05:45 3 18 3 9 6 27 17:45 2 23 17 94 19 117 06:00 4 2 6 18:00 2 13 15 06:15 7 6 13 18:15 3 11 14 06:30 3 6 9 18:30 4 9 13 06:45 4 18 4 18 8 36 18:45 6 15 10 43 16 58 07:00 6 3 9 19:00 5 11 16 07:15 7 14 21 19:15 4 10 14 07:30 6 15 21 19:30 4 8 12 07:45 10 29 28 60 38 89 19:45 2 15 11 40 13 55 08:00 10 12 22 20:00 5 13 18 08:15 5 10 15 20:15 3 9 12 08:30 10 9 19 20:30 5 9 14 08:45 18 43 11 42 29 85 20:45 3 16 11 42 14 58 09:00 8 12 20 21:00 2 8 10 09:15 9 8 17 21:15 5 11 16 09:30 3 15 18 21:30 2 8 10 09:45 5 25 11 46 16 71 21:45 3 12 8 11 47 10:00 6 14 20 22:00 5 4 9 10:15 9 13 22 22:15 1 3 4 10:30 4 14 18 22:30 4 3 7 10:45 5 24 8 49 13 73 I2:45 1 11 3 13 4 24 11:00 1 8 9 23:00 2 4 6 11:15 1 15 16 23:15 0 6 6 11:30 7 7 14 23:30 3 3 6 11:45 5 14 9 39 14 53 23:45 1 6 1 1.1 2 20 TOTALS 189 270 459 TOTALS 197 543 740 SPLIT% 41.2% 58.8% 38.3% SPLIT% 26.6% 73.4% 61.7% DAILY TOTALS NB SB I EB WB I Total 0 0 386 813 1,199 AM Peak Hour 08:30 07:15 07:15 PM Peak Hour 14:00 16:45 16:45 AM Pk Volume 45 69 101 PM Pk Volume 31 101 126 Pk Hr Pastor 0.625 0.616 0.671 Pk Hr factor 0.700 0.871 0.870 7-9 Volume 72 102 174 4.6 Volume 37 108 195 7-9 Peak Hour 08:00 07:15 07 15 4-6 Peak Hour 16.05 16.45 16:45 7.9 Pk Volume 43 69 10I 4-6 Pk Volume 25 101 126 Pk Hr Factor 0.597 0.616 0.671 Pk Hr factor 0.893 0.871 0.875 Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Project#: CA19_5399_003 City: Rosemead Location: Olney St W/O Temple City Blvd Date: 6/11/2019 100 90 — — — — 80 70 60 v r 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oo O '-1 N r+1 V Cr; D n 00 OI O o o o o o o o O ry M O O O O O O O O O 4"1 r'I N N N 6090 000'0 109'0 .1,91,699 LLS'0 S3CC T95'C ,o1,911H 9d SES 99eC 80n10A 9d9-9 181 09 CES ..,,IFA 9d 6•1 St 91 00 L1 St 9I noH 98ad 9 9 SILO 59 L0 SI LC ,'01198ad 6-1 650 611 410 aw610A 9-t 610 08 661 awn10A 6-L 158'0 SLB'0 198'0 00908109 9d [LS'0 SOL 0 195'0 0.681 AA 9d 991 LC PC 6w910A Md Wd L85 09 061 6wn10A Rd WV S9 El 0041 St 9T [906 9899 Wd S1:10 59-L0 Si LO ,^01-1,19.d WV T50'T I 0 0I OZ8 1E6 Sl\I101 AIIVa lelol 8M 93 85 8N %CE9 %1'0S %6 LP %111dS %E'90 %00E %4'09 %11195 MT TBS SOS 514101 SE9 6E0 96E 511/101 80 9 L: £ :: t 5V EZ EB 81 OV ZI E6 9 SV:II L V E 00:80 41L L 00:TI S EZ SF£Z is OI IZ nal 01 L E 00:00 OZ IT 6 00:11 SE— ET 0 81 E 58U 08 61 _ -- OE 8 ZS II 5910T L T 9 OE:Zi IZ5 91 00:00 9 £ E WIZ OE IT 61 SI:0T ET L 9 00:00 51 9 9 00:0T SC 61 £4 01 00 6 SV:TZ Z6 TZ 80 9 PS St SV:60 II L V WIZ 80 OT 85 DE:60 EZ ZI 11 5T:12 91 01 9 51:60 ZZ VT 8 00:10 CZ _ it ST 00:60 TB Cl PP ZI LE 8 54:05 OZI 60 94 5 4L 5Z 54:80 ST S OT 00:00 £Z Z1 IT 0E:80 81 IIL 51:02 60 8 It ST:80 BZ 91 ZI 0000 60 _ it LS 00:80 001 BZ - 65 ZI E4 91 59:61 651 08 - 4E OZ S01 19 SV:LO SZ LT8 05:61 8E P 4E 00:09 00 90 V 5I:61 6Z P SZ 11:00 6Z PT SI 00:61 TI 9 S 00:L0 OTT OE OL LI OP £T 58:81 6E S IT T 8Z P 18:90 Si VT IT 05:81 VI E TT 05:90 E2 LT 9 ST:81 6 4 S ST:90 0E ZZ 01 00:81 TT 0 8 00:90 SEI 6Z V9 91 IL ET SP:LI LT E IT 1 9 Z 59:50 1V ZZ 61 00:LT 0 2 0 00:50 5E EI ZZ STILT 8 5 E 51:50 OE _ _ ET LI 00:LT P E T 00:50 811 6Z SS EI E9 91 51:91 ZS 9 L 9 S 0 5940 ZZ TT IT 05:91 0 I 0 00440 LE 6T 81 50:91 E 0 0 5190 OE 0.1 81 00:91 0 0 0 00:40 ETI Z2 6p OI 49 01 58:50 E t Z 0 T 1 58:00 80 01 91 00081 0 0 0 DE:E0 ZE 05 OZ ST:ST 0 0 0 51:00 TE _ SI 91 00:51 5 _ Z 0 00:80 HT TE LL 15 95 OI 58:00 S 4 4 E I 1 58:00 ZE LT ST OE:81 1 1 0 00:20 PE LI LT 51:41 0 0 0 51:00 9E ZZ 4I 00:V1 0 __ 0 0 00:00 STT i4 VS LT 19 SZ WET L E 5 0 0 T 54:10 E0 ZI IT 05:ET E Z I 05:10 LZ VT £I WET0 0 0 ST:TO EZ IT 01 00:ET 1 I 0 00:T0 SC 9T 9E TT 6E 5 WTI 91 5 TT 0 5 Z 58:00 LT IT 9 OE:ZI Z 1 I 05:00 81 L IT 5101 5 E Z 51:00 42 L C[ 00:014 4 0 00:00 11/101 8M 83 HS ON Po!1ad INd 14101 8M 93 85 ON P011ad INV ISL.! I 0 0 I OZ8 IE6 Slb'101/MVO 181.1 9141 83 85 8N 100 6605 6140:8 Palad 6100/11/9:ale° peawasog:Alp Aepsani:AeO is Aauto 0/N any OPUGH O!H 3wmoA 99119,09 w1A9099s a 09001001,099 pu0d004 Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Project #: CA19_5399_001 City: Rosemead Location: Rio Hondo Ave N/O Olney St Date: 6/11/2019 140 NN S8 [B mwci .. 120 — -- -- 100 80 — 61 60 - ‘1114IF wir 40 20 o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 V' 6; lD ER [! u CO r' Op a.; O O O O O O O O O O 11 .-+ .--I ri r-4 .-1 r-1 ri .--1 ri N N N N Prepared by National Data&Surveying Semites VOLUME Temple City Blvd S/0 Olney St Day:Tuesday City:Rosemead Date:6/11/2019 Protect N:CA19_5399_004 DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB I Total 15.811 14,434 0 0 30,245 AM Period NB 513 EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 52 58 110 12:00 193 223 416 00:15 32 37 69 12:15 197 223 420 00:30 42 32 74 12:30 212 237 449 00:45 31 157 34 161 65 318 12:45 228 830 236 919 464 1749 01:00 25 28 53 13:00 251 199 450 01:15 24 24 48 13:15 212 263 475 01:30 25 23 48 13:30 199 210 409 01:45 21 95 17 92 38 187 13:45 235 897 252 924 487 1821 02:00 14 17 31 14:00 205 233 438 02:15 33 18 51 14:15 200 225 425 02:30 19 23 42 14:30 228 249 477 02:45 25 91 13 71 38 162 14:45 227 860 210 917 437 1777 03:00 24 16 40 15:00 209 212 421 03:15 21 16 37 15:15 213 210 423 03:30 20 31 51 15:30 248 234 482 03:45 18 83 32 95 50 178 15:45 237 907 243 899 480 1806 04:00 24 28 52 16:00 212 215 427 04:15 25 45 70 16:15 232 238 470 04:30 49 68 117 16:30 261 241 502 04:45 68 166 61 202 129 368 16:45 289 994 251 945 540 1939 05:00 54 114 168 17:00 274 224 498 05:15 93 128 221 17:15 281 252 533 05:30 126 127 253 17:30 251 184 435 05:45 , 162 435 142 511 304 946 17:45 248 1054 199 859 _ 447 1913, 06:00 141 144 285 18:00 266 235 501 06:15 216 146 362 18:15 300 203 503 06:30 286 123 409 1830 250 193 443 06:45 311 954 154 567 465 1521 18:45 244 1060 206 837 450 1897 07:00 267 174 441 19:00 211 198 409 07:15 295 186 481 19:15 189 177 366 07:30 290 167 457 19:30 162 180 342 07:45 314 1166 189 716 503 1882 19:45 154 716 177 732 331 1448 08:00 275 146 421 20:00 126 148 274 08:15 313 170 483 20:15 150 169 319 08:30 304 198 502 20:30 120 157 277 08:45 293 1185 168 682 461 1867 20:45 155 551 150 624 305 1175 09:00 281 188 469 21:00 144 128 272 09:15 225 199 424 21:15 116 139 255 09:30 231 212 443 21:30 114 187 301 09:45 204 941 229 828 433 1769 21:45 , 117 491 126 580 243 1071 10:00 193 210 403 22:00 110 140 250 10:15 203 228 431 22:15 80 119 199 10:30 204 235 439 22:30 107 103 210 10:45 204 804 209 882 413 1686 22:45 63 360 84 4-46 147 806 11:00 204 212 416 23:00 82 70 152 11:15 199 128 327 23:15 63 68 131 11:30 166 160 326 23:30 67 51 118 11:45 176 745 209 709 385 1454 23:45 57 269 47 236 104 505 TOTALS 6822 5516 12338 TOTALS 8989 8918 17907 SPLIT% 55.3% 44.7% 40.8% SPLIT% 50.2% 49.8% 59.2% DAILY TOTALS NB SB I EB WB I Total 15,811 14,434 0 0 30,245 AM Peak Hour 07:45 09:45 08:15 PM Peak Hour 16:30 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 1206 902 1915 PM Pk Volume 1105 968 2073 Pk Hr Factor 0.960 0.960 0.954 Pk Hr Factor 0.956 0.960 0.960 7-9 Volume 2351 1398 3749 4-6 Volume 2048 1804 3852 7-9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:45 4-6 Peak Hour 1630 16:30 16:30 7-9PkVolume 1206 716 1909 4-6 Pk Volume 1105 958 2073 Pk Hr Factor 0.960 0,947 0.949 Pk Hr Factor 0.956 0.960 0.960 Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Project#: CA19_5399_004 City: Rosemead Location: Temple City Blvd S/0 Olney St Date: 6/11/2019 1400 QNB SSB SEB AWB 1200 1000 fr 800 u_ r 600 400 zoo / 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O .ti N M 4 t/1 tG h 00 Ot O rl N M V t/1 lO h 00 a; O O O O O O O O O O 1-1 1-1 t"f .--1 N N N SPEED SURVEY City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: DE ADALENA ST EB Field Observer EFI Limits: RIO HONDO AVE Checked By: EGF ELLIS LANE Date: 6/11/2019 Factors Direction: East A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey MID BLOCK 85th Percentile 35.4 10 mph Pace 27-36 Percent in Pace 76.0% Posted Speed Limit 25 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 2 Collision Rate(Acc/MVM) 3.764 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 1969 Length of Segment 1300 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 25 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name DE ADALENA ST EB Limits: RIO HONDO AVE to ELLIS LANE Radar Survey Sheet X=West /=East 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 45 . l I l 1 II 1 I , 2 2.0% 100% I 2 2.0% 98.0% 1 1.0% 96.0% 40 _ 1 1.0% 95.0% 0 '---- _ 2 2.0% 94.0% I 1 1 1.0% 92.0% 1 I I _ 3 3.0% 91.0% �/ 1 1 1I 1 l 5 5.0% 88.0% 35 / //1// 1 I I 8 8.0% 0% 83.0%. �� / - 5 5.0% 63.0% i 9 9.0% 58.0% 5 5.0% 49.0% 30 ! I _ 8 8.0% 44.0% 0.0f/P1/1// 5 5.0% 36.0% 1 13 13.0% 31.0% 1 I I l 6 6.0% 18.0% 4 4.0% 12.0% 25 k k I I _ ! I I 3 3.0% 8.0% 2 2.0% 5.0% f I _ _ _ 1 1 i 1 1.0% 3.0% I _ 1 1.0% 2.0% 20 j , 1 1.0% 1.0% I I I II 1 1 15 11 1 1 I - J -1 I i I I II I , H I I 101E ‘ ..._ 5 I l I 11 I I_ I 1 � I j Iii l _ t o f I Il ' 1 II Total Samples 100 Date of Survey: 6/1112019 Start Time: 13:00 85th Percentile Speed: 35.4 50th Percentile Speed: 31.1 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 14:30 15th Percentile Speed: 26.5 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 25 10 MPH Pace: 27-36 Street Class.: Local/Neighborhoo Observer: ER Number in Pace: 76 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 76.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: DE ADALENA ST WB Field Observer EFI Limits: RIO HONDO AVE Checked By: EGF ELLIS LANE Date: 6/11/2019 Factors Direction: West A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey MID BLOCK 85th Percentile 35.8 10 mph Pace 27-36 Percent in Pace 75.0% Posted Speed Limit 25 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 411/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 2 Collision Rate(AccIMVM) 3.823 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 1969 Length of Segment 1280 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 25 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# -- i City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name DE ADALENA ST WB Limits: RIO HONDO AVE to ELLIS LANE Radar Survey Sheet X=West /=East 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 4511 ) 1 I II I I 11 1 1 _ _ I 1 11 ( 1 I 11 I _ .ii I I 1 I 2 2.0% 100% ill 2 2.0% 98.0% 1 1.0% 96.0% 40 4 I 2 2.0% 95.0% 41-9 1 1 1 3 3.0%1 93.0% 1 1 I 1 1.0% 90.0% (+ 3 3.0% 89.0% o( ♦ T 5 5.0% 86.0% 35 .440II00. 1 1 9 9.0%1 81.0% 00,0 00 I 1 ( 13 13.0% 72.0% 5 5.0% 59.0% 441 111 8 8.0% 54.0% 0044 6 6.0% 46.0% 30 U.0 �4 4♦ 8 8.0% 40.0% 014 `► I I 4 4.0% 32.0% � I 0 1 00 I ( I _ 1 11 11.0% 28.0% +. 6 6.0% 17.0% */(� 3 3.0% 11.0% 25 „ (► 3 3.0% 8.0% _ 2 2.0% 5.0% I I 1 1 1.0% 3.0% I 20 4 1 1.0% 1.0% 1 I 1 , 1 - 15 ___ 1 I I --r - 10 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 5 1 Total Samples 100 Date of Survey: 6/11/2019 Start Time: 14:30 85th Percentile Speed: 35.8 50th Percentile Speed: 31.5 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 16:00 15th Percentile Speed: 26.7 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 25 10 MPH Pace: 27-36 Street Class.: Local/Neighborhoo Observer: ER Number in Pace: 75 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 75.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: ELLIS LANE NB Field Observer EFI Limits: MARSHALL ST Checked By: EGF OLNEY ST Date: 617/2019 Factors Direction: North A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey MID BLOCK • 85th Percentile 32.3 10 mph Pace 21 -30 Percent in Pace 72.0% Posted Speed Limit 25 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 1 Collision Rate(Acc/MVM) 4.735 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 1049 Length of Segment 970 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometries None Apparent Comments E.Adiacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 25 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name ELLIS LANE NB Lim its: MARSHALL ST to OLNEY ST Radar Survey Sheet X=North /=South 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 4511111111■111111111111011111M11111111111111111111111M111111111111■■■1111111111101111111111111011� ■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice®� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MIIIII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1011111=•• 40►=►=(■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 100% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■11■■■■■■■■1111■11■IIIIIIIN� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■i1111111� ►:►:oo■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 8.0% 96.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■=1111111� 35■■■■■■■11■■■■■11111111111■■1111111111111111111111■■■■■■■■■■IIIIIIIIIII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■NIII•� e►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■® 4.0% 68.0% oenom ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■® 4.0% 84.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111lllllMillllll� 30►:401:le►:�e■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■11■■1111■■■ 6 12.0% 80.0% ►:►:►�t►:►:►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 6 12.0% 68.0% ►/►/■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 56.0% ►:g.4 ►:►:4►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 6 12.0% 52.0% ►:►��► ►��■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 8.0% 40.0% 25►O Oil 0►0►1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■ 6 12.0% 32.0% ►:►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 20.0% ►��►��■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 16.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1•11111MI� MIIII■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■11■■■■1111■1111■■■■■■■■■■■lull 4.0% 12.0% 20►:t►:4■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■® 4.0% 8.0% oe■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 4.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■1111■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■1��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIIIII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� 15■■■■■■■11■11■1111■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�®� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111■1111■■■11■1111111111■■■■■■■■■MINII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II111_� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■11■■■■■■■■i ■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■11■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111111111111� 10 ■11■■■11■■■11■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■11M11111•11� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■11■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1•11111■� 5 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■IIIMI■M ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111=1111100 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111•111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111•111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�_� 0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ IIIIIII� I . .11 1 Date of Survey: 617/2019 Start Time: 13:30 85th Percentile Speed: 32.3 50th Percentile Speed: 26.8 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 15:00 15th Percentile Speed: 22.5 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 25 10 MPH Pace: 21-30 Street Class.: LocalNelghborhoo Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 36 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 72.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: ELLIS LANE SB Field Observer EFI Limits: MARSHALL ST Checked By: EGF OLNEY ST Date: 6/7/2019 Factors Direction: South A. Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey MID BLOCK 85th Percentile 32.3 10 mph Pace 21 -30 Percent in Pace 72.0% Posted Speed Limit 25 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 411/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 1 Collision Rate(AccIMVM) 4.735 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 1049 Length of Segment 970 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification LocallNeighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 25 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name ELLIS LANE SB Limits: MARSHALL ST to OLNEY ST Radar Survey Sheet X=North /=South 5 10 15 20 . 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 45■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MMIll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ M=1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� 40 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 100% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■liiiii■lllllllll■liiiiiiiiili■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■llllllllll■lllllllll■ /III■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■rm 8.0% 96.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111111111111� 35■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■mem >%I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 88.0% rI■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 84.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� 30 W&I.r/FIWAIIIIIIMM11.0111111111MIMMIIIIMINIIIIIIIN 6 12.0% 80.0% I■OIO■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 6 12.0% 68.0% i%I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 56.0% F112012.12.P21111111111111.11.111111111111.11111111111111111111111MMINEM 6 12.0% 52.0% III ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 8.0% 40.0% 25 1.2&12&&&111111111111M11111111•11IMMUM111111111M1111111 6 12.0% 32-0% II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 20.0% r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 16.0% ••■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 12.0% 20%I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 4.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIIMII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111111111111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11•111111� 15 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ MIIIIMIll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� 10ul■■■uu•uuuu■■■■■■■■■u■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■S�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■INIM� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111•111� 5 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111M1� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■==111� 0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111� Date of Survey: 6/7/2019 Start Time: 12:00 85th Percentile Speed: 32.3 50th Percentile Speed: 26.8 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 13:30 15th Percentile Speed: 22.5 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 25 10 MPH Pace: 21-30 Street Class.: LocallNeighborhoo Observer: ER Number in Pace: 36 Conditions not 72.0% Apparent: Percent in Pace: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: MARSHALL ST EB Field Observer EFI Limits: ELLIS LANE Checked By: EGF TEMPLE CITY BLVD Date: 6/11/2019 Factors Direction: East A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey MID BLOCK 85th Percentile 26.9 10 mph Pace 20-29 Percent in Pace 100.0% Posted Speed Limit 25 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 411/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 1 Collision Rate(Acc/MVM) 4.193 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 2553 Length of Segment 450 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D. Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometries None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 25 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name MARSHALL ST EB Limits: ELLIS LANE to TEMPLE CITY BLVD Radar Survey Sheet X=West /=East 5 10 15 20 25- 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 45■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■111111■■■■■___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■fiiiii■__ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■1111■■■■■11■■■■■11■___ 401■1■■■■1■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■_iiiiii11111_ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■11■■■■■■■11■11■■iiiiii■_ll_ ■■■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■lllll�lllllllll■lll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■1■■■■llll■__ll_ 35■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■1■■■■■■■■■■■11■■1111■■■■___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■___ 30MEMIUMNIUMIIMMEMEIMMOMMUMMI &S■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 100% II%.�I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©10.0% 96.0% I!EM■■I■■■1111■■■■■■■11■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 8.0% 86.0% r►:I►I.&.FIS ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 8 16.0% 78.0% 25 WISIZIMMIMEMMEMMUIMMUMMEMM O� ■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■iiiii7 6.0% 54.0% Wi%I�.rI MMET A■■■■■■■1111■11111111■■11■■■■■■■■11111111iifi!22.0% 48.0% ► I►I IO►t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■ 8 16.0% 26.0% /II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■1111■■■■■■©� 6.0% 10.0% 20 0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■iiiiJ 4.0% 4.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■_ii__ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■___ 1■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■-__ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�__ 15■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111111111111111111111111111M■■■■■■■_ii__ 1111■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■ii___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111111■■11■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■ii___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■___ 10■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■i1■■■■___ ■■11■111111■■■■■■■11■■■■■11■1111■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■ii__� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1ii___ 5 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■1111=__ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■i___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■�__ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■f___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ii_i_0 _ Date of Survey: 6/1112019 Start Time: 9:00 85th Percentile Speed: 26.9 50th Percentile Speed: 23.3 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 11:00 15th Percentile Speed: 21.3 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 25 10 MPH Pace: 20-29 Street Class.: Local/Neighborhoo Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 50 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 00.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: MARSHALL ST WB Field Observer EFI Limits: ELLIS LANE Checked By: EGF TEMPLE CITY BLVD Date: 6111/2019 Factors Direction: West A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey MID BLOCK 85th Percentile 26.9 10 mph Pace 20-29 Percent in Pace 100.0% Posted Speed Limit 25 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 1 Collision Rate(AccIMVM) 4.193 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 2553 Length of Segment 450 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adllacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 25 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name MARSHALL ST WB Limits: ELLIS LANE to TEMPLE CITY BLVD Radar Survey Sheet X=West /=East 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 45■■■■■111111111111111111111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111111101111•11•11� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIM ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■==11� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111111•1� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111•11111� 40■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MINII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MII•� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� 35111111■■■11111111111111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 111111111111111111111M111111111•11=� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111111111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ NIMII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ IIIIIIIIII� 30►MI■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© ►:►_eC1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©10.0% 96.0% OCIMIIII ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■EJ 8.0% 86.0% ►_o_,►_u_oCooke►.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 8 16.0% 78.0% 25 CO 02■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 8.0% 62.0% ►��►:►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 6.0% 54.0% ►:45►:4k10:102Wee.11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m 22.0% 48.0% ►:►:►3oe►:4►5e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 8 16.0% 26.0% ►:I►_►:!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 6.0% 10.0% 20CO■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 4.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■=M11111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111111M1� 15■■■■111111111111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111MIN� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l�alllllll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I�llll�lllllll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I1111=11lllllll� 10■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111111111111111M111M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I•M� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111111=� 5 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111•1111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■INIMIN� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111•11� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� 0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEQ • • •11 • . Date of Survey: 6111/2019 Start Time: 11:00 85th Percentile Speed: 26.9 50th Percentile Speed: 23.3 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 13:00 15th Percentile Speed: 21.3 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 25 10 MPH Pace: 20-29 Street Class.: Local/Nelghborhoo Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 50 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 00.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: OLNEY ST EB Field Observer EFI Limits: RIO HONDO AVE Checked By: EGF TEMPLE CITY BLVD Date: 6/10/2019 Factors Direction: East A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey MID BLOCK ELLIS AND MARYBETH 85th Percentile 30.8 10 mph Pace 24-33 Percent in Pace 78.0% Posted Speed Limit 25 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 6/4/2016 To 6/4/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 4 Collision Rate(Acc/MVM) 4.91 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 1981 Length of Segment 1760 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 25 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name OLNEY ST EB Limits: RIO HONDO AVE to TEMPLE CITY BLVD Radar Survey Sheet X=West /=East 5 10 15 20 . 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 45■1111■IN■■■■■11■■IN■■■■■■■1111111111■11■11■IN■■■■■■11111111111111M■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■11■■■11■■■■11■1111■■■■■11■■■■•111=1■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■IN■■■IN■■■IN11■■■1111111■■■® ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■■■■_■� ■■■■IN■11■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■=■111111■■� 40■■■■1111■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■11■■■■1111■■■INIIM■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111111111111111111111111111■■■11® 4.0% 100% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■IN■■■■■■1111■■■■MIN� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■�■�� 35 ■■MIN■■■■■■■ININ1111111111111111IN111111111■11111IN11111■■■11111111■D 96.0% oo■■M■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■® 4.0% 94.0% Ir■■■■■■■■IN■■■■11■■M■■■IN■■■■■M■■■■■■■■M■■■11 4.0% 90.0% ///111111111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■® 4.0% 86.0% 30 II/I12 I I■■■■■■M■■■■IN■11■■IN■IN■■■IN■■■■■■■IN■■■I 14.0% 82.0% P■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■■M■■IN■IN■IN■■■■11■■■■11■IN■I 10.0% 68.0% II X011■■■11■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■1111■ 4 8.0% 58.0% 12II /■M11MM■■■■■■11■MMMM■■■■■■■■M11M■■11M■■11©10.0% 50.0% %I P///11111■■■■11■■■■111111■■■■■■■■■IN■1111■■■1111■M 10.0% 40.0% 255I12 I■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■IN■■■■■■■■■■IN■M■IN■■■■■11■I 8.0% 30.0% %r IM11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ININ■M■■■■■■© 6.0% 22.0% ■11111111■■■1111■■■■111111■■■■■■11■11■■1111■IN■■■1111■11■��■■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111■■■■■■■■■■11■■1111■■© 4.0% 16.0% t IMIIN11■■■11■■■■11■■M■■■■■ININ■M■IN■■MINI■■■■■■■© 6.0% 12.0% 20rAtiU■M■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■11■■IN■■■■■■© ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111.11■■� ■■MIN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■■■� ■■M■IN■IN■■■11■■■■■■■M■1111■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■IN��■� 15■M11■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■IN■■■1111■■IN11■■M■■M■■IM■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 1111■IN■■IN■■■■■■■IN■■■■■111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11��■M■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■M■IN■■■R■■�■�■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■M■■1111■■■■•1■■■1 10■■■■■■■■111111■■■■■1111■■■■■1111111111111111111111111111111111■■■M■IIII■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■■■IN■IN■■■■�■�■■• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■1111■■■■■■1111■1111■■■■■■■��� 5 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■� ■■■MIN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■IN■■■■■■■IN■■■IN■M�M�■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■11■■■■�■M■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■�■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■IN■■M■■■■IN■■■■■■ 1111■a■� 0 ■■■1111■■■■■11■■■■11■11111111■■■■■■■1111■■■11■■11■■■�11•� Date of Survey: 6/10/2019 Start Time: 11:00 85th Percentile Speed: 30.8 50th Percentile Speed: 27.0 Weather: Sunny and Div End Time: 12:30 15th Percentile Speed: 21.8 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 25 10 MPH Pace: 24-33 Street Class.: Local/Neighborhoo Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 39 Conditions not _ Percent in Pace: 78.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: OLNEY ST WB Field Observer EFI Limits: RIO HONDO AVE Checked By: EGF TEMPLE CITY BLVD Date: 6/10/2019 Factors Direction: West A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey MID BLOCK ELLIS AND MARYBETH 85th Percentile 32.4 10 mph Pace 24-33 Percent in Pace 78.0% Posted Speed Limit 25 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 4 Collision Rate(Acc/MVM) 4.91 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 1981 Length of Segment 1760 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 25 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name OLNEY ST WB Limits: RIO HONDO AVE to TEMPLE CITY BLVD Radar Survey Sheet X=West /=East 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 45■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a•■_ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I•M� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■a■a■■a■■■aa■■■a■■■■■■IIIIaIIII� 4011111111111111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIII� ►5►_4►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iiia© 6.0% 100% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■aa■■■■■■�■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111111=■� 35��■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 9 cv_►:►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 8.0% 90.0% 0■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 2.0% 82.0% COkW■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ei 8,0% 80.0% 30 W►:W►5►:4■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■714.0% 72.0% 0►�4COMIII■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■7 8.0% 58.0% co►:►l4►:4o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 6 12.0% 50.0% et:411■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i 4.0% 38.0% ►��►.►��►:►��■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■�10.0% 34.0% 25►:►:e►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■U 8.0% 24.0% ►:4►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 16.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■aaa■■■■■■IMII■�■� 0■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■!1 2.0% 12.0% ►_4iM4►.1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 8.0% 10.0% 20 IIIMMEMMIIIIIM1111111111111111101111M11111111111111MMIIIIIMIMII ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■=ME■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■� 15■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iiia■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■�■_ 10■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■�■�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MIME ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I•l� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■a■■■��� 5 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■INI111a11111a� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■=■1111■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■��■� 0 ■a■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■a■■■■■■■a■■M11■=IMEMENEMMEMMTIMII a� Date of Survey: 6/10/2019 Start Time: 12:30 85th Percentile Speed: 32.4 50th Percentile Speed: 28.0 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 14:00 15th Percentile Speed: 23.5 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 25 10 MPH Pace: 24-33 Street Class.: Local/Neighborhoo Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 39 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 78.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: RIO HONDO AVE NB Field Observer EFI Limits: MARSHALL ST Checked By: EGF OLNEY ST Date: 6/7/2019 Factors Direction: North A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey SOUTH OF GLENDON WAY 85th Percentile 33.3 10 mph Pace 25-34 Percent in Pace 92.0% Posted Speed Limit 30 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 2 Collision Rate(Acc/MVM) 5.79 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 1751 Length of Segment 950 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 30 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# • City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name RIO HONDO AVE NB Limits: MARSHALL ST to OLNEY ST Radar Survey Sheet X=North /=South 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 45■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ILII=O ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�L�L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111111M1L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■�L■L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■LIL■L� 40■■■1111■11111111111111111■■111111111111■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■LIIIIML� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■LIL�L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■LI�LI_ CI■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■D 2.0% 100% 35►='►=■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 08.0% ►_►_CO:O:►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 6 12.0% 04.0% ►:►��►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 6.0% 82.0% W►_+►.►_WWW►.W►_■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 10 20.0% 76.0% ►:►:►5►5►'►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 6 12.0% 66.0% 30M:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■U■© 6.0% 44.0% ►��eeimmi■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 8.0% 38.0% We►55■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■1111■■1111©10.0% 30.0% ►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� 2.0% 20.0% ►.4►5o►:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 8.0% 18.0% • 25►71►:t►:4C.M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 8.0% 10.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■11■ILL■� G.I■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i 2.0% 2.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111ILL■Ll� 20■■■■1111111111111■■■1111111111■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ILE1111LI� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■IL1MLI� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IL111111L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■11■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■lL111110� 15■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■LIL■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■11■��L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■11■lLL■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■ILM1111� 10■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■���� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��Ll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111L1111111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■111111■■■■■11lLL■L� 5 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■LIL■L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■11■11■rL1111111L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■LIL■L� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■11■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■lLL■L� 0 ■1111■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■LIL■L� Date of Survey: 6/7/2019 Start Time: 10:30 85th Percentile Speed: 33.3 50th Percentile Speed: 30.5 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 12:00 15th Percentile Speed: 25.6 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 30 10 MPH Pace: 25-34 Street Class.: Local!Neighborhoo Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 46 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 92.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: RIO HONDO AVE SB Field Observer EFI Limits: MARSHALL ST Checked By: EGF OLNEY ST Date: 6/712019 Factors Direction: South A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey SOUTH OF GLENDON WAY 85th Percentile 33.4 10 mph Pace 25-34 Percent in Pace 92.0% Posted Speed Limit 30 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 2 Collision Rate(Acc/MVM) 5.79 Expected Collision Rate 1.37 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 1751 Length of Segment 950 Lane Configuration 1 Ln Ea Dir Undivided Street Classification Local/Neighborhood D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 30 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name RIO HONDO AVE SB Limits: MARSHALL ST to OLNEY ST Radar Survey Sheet X=North /=South 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 45■■111111111111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MININ� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■_■■■_■■■■■■__■_��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■11■■■■■■■=■■■■11111111111 1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111111111' ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■__■■■■■■■=■11==■■■■■■_■■■��� 40■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■=1111I1111IIIII•� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I•MIN� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111■■■I111IIIII1� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■=11■■■■■■■■■■■■■__■■■=■=■==lllll�� 35 6.0% 100% I►►►II00■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 8 16.0% 94.0% ���■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 6.0% 78.0% /►40&Ir■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 8 16.0% 72.0% ill%//I I■■■11=■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■ 6 12.0% 56.0% 3°ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii © 10 %0 8.0 0 /2/IP2►.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©10.0% 28.0% IA■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■l© 4.0% 18.0% II/I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 6.0% 14.0% 25 1 IW■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■1111■I© 6.0% 8.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11=■■■■■11MIIIIIM� •■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111■■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■■■■D ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■IIIIlllll�� 20■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■l1lllll�lllllll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■=■11■■■■■■lIIIlllllIll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIIIMIll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■��� 15■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■_■__■■■■■__■■■■■■111=11■■■■■■■■■I• IIIIIII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l>•IllIIIIlll ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�_�__ 10■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■--___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■•�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■11=■11■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■M•� 5 ■■■■■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■=■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■ II1M� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■I�lllll�lllllll _ 0 ■■111111■■■■■■1111_■■■■■■■■■■■■■=1111■=■■■=1111■==1II=1� Date of Survey: 6/7/2019 Start Time: 9:00 85th Percentile Speed: 33.4 50th Percentile Speed: 30.5 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 10:30 15th Percentile Speed: 26.3 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 30 10 MPH Pace: 25-34 Street Class.: Local!Neighborhoo Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 46 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 92.0% Apparent: City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: TEMPLE CITY BLVD NB Field Observer EFI Limits: GUESS ST Checked By: EGF MARSHALL ST Date: 6/10/2019 Factors Direction: North/South A. Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey SOUTH OF GUESS ST 85th Percentile 45.8 10 mph Pace 37-46 Percent in Pace 67.3% Posted Speed Limit 40 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 ) Total Collisions 11 Collision Rate(Acc/MVM) 1.844 Expected Collision Rate 1.85 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 30245 Length of Segment 950 Lane Configuration 2 Lns Ea Dir wl LT Pockets and DYCL Street Classification Class 2(Secondary)Arterial D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometries None Apparent Comments E.Adjacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 40 Speed Limit Change? • Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name TEMPLE CITY BLVD NB Limits: GUESS ST to MARSHALL ST t Radar Survey Sheet X=North /=South , 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% , 60■■■11■■11■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■11■■■11■■■■Ilii■■-■• . ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111■11■■■11■■■■■•U•RU ■• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■11■■■■■I■■■11■■■■■■IIIIIIIIIIIIII //I■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 to% 100% I■1111■■1111■■■■11■■■■1111■■■I1111■■1111■■11■■■1111■■■REN 1.0% 99.0% 55■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MMS - ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIII>• &FA■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 98.0% II■■1111IIIIMI 11■■11■■■■■11111111111111■111111■■■1111■■■© 2.0% 96.0% 50 IIIIMIIIIIIMIIMIIIIIIIIMIIIIIMINIMMIIMUill 1.0% 94.1% , I•■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 2.0% 93.1% , ■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■1111■■■■11■■■■■11■■■11■■■■■■IIIIfitllllllllfitllllllllll■ /II II■11■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■III© 5.0% 91.1% IIIIII■■■illi■■■■■■111111■1111■■■11■■■■■11■■■11■■ 6 5.9% 86.1% 45 III&1I1.WI■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■® 6.9% 80.2% II/II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■111111■■■■■■IIEI 5.0% 73.3% .rA%II11■111111■■11111111■■■1111■■■■1111■■11■■■■■■1111■■11 4 4.0% 68.3% i IIIII/I■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIIf7 6.9% 64.4% j IIIIII/I■■11■■11■■■11■11■■■■11■■■11■■■111111■■■■■■IIID 6.9% 57.4% 40���%IIIIIVAIII■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■®11.9% 50.5% , IIIIIIII■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■Illi■■■11■■■■ 8 7.9% 38.6% III AW4111■■1111■■■■■■■■■■11111111■■■■1111■■■■■IMIIMD 6.9% 30.7% %IIII■■■■■■11■■1111■■■1111■■■■■■illi■■■11■■■■1111fII© 5.0% 23.8% IEI I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■11■■■11■■■■■11■■ 4 4.0% 18.8% 35IIOII■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 5.0% 14.9% II/II■■■illi■■■■■■■11■■■11■■■■11■■■■■11■■■■■■III© 5.0% 9.9% %I■11■1111■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■11■■■11■■■■1111■■■11■■III© 2.0% 5.0% I■■■■■11■■1111■1111■■■■11■■11■■■■■11■■■11■11■■1111■.11811.0% 3.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■11■■11■■■■■■1111111111 30 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■f10 1.0% 2.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■SIM ■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■1.I11111 _ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�_� 2511■■■■■■■■■■■■111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■IIEIM___ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IsfIIIII�IIIIIIIi_ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■fifl�_ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIIIIIIIIIII ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■mss 20i ___ ■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111■■■■11■■■1111■■■11■■■■ IIIIM ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■SMI ■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■11111111■■■11■■11I■11■■■■11■INIfIIIIIII■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■11■■■■■■IIIMOfIII__ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■R■■■■■■IMIIINIIII IIIIIII_ 15■11■1111■11■■1111■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■11■■1111■11■11■11■■�fl� . • . II . . 1 Date of Survey: 6/10/2019 Start Time: 10:00 85th Percentile Speed: 45.8 50th Percentile Speed: 40.0 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 11:00 15th Percentile Speed: 35.0 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 40 10 MPH Pace: 37-46 Street Class.: Class 2(Secondary Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 68 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 67.3% Apparent: 1 City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Street: TEMPLE CITY BLVD SB Field Observer EFI Limits: GUESS ST Checked By: EGF MARSHALL ST Date: 6/10/2019 Factors Direction: South A.Prevailing Speed Data Location of Survey SOUTH OF GUESS ST 85th Percentile 43.5 10 mph Pace 32-41 Percent in Pace 66.0% Posted Speed Limit 40 B.Collision History Date Range Covered 4/1/2016 To 4/1/2019 ( 3 Total Collisions 11 Collision Rate(AccIMVM) 1.844 Expected Collision Rate 1.85 C.Traffic Factors Average Daily Traffic 30245 Length of Segment 950 1. Lane Configuration 2 Lns Ea Dir w/LT Pockets and DYCL Street Classification Class 2(Secondary)Arterial D.Conditions Not Readily Apparent Conditions Roadway Geometrics None Apparent Comments E.Adiacent Land Use Single Family Residential Posted Speed Limit 40 Speed Limit Change? Revised Speed Limit Approved and Authorized for release by City of Rosemead-Traffic Engineering Department: Date Loc.# City of Rosemead Public Works Department Street Name TEMPLE CITY BLVD SB Limits: GUESS ST to MARSHALL ST Radar Survey Sheet X=North /=South 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 # %ea cum.% 6011111111■■■11111111■1111111111111111111111111111111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN111111111� P2■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ID 1.0% 100% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111S� 55■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111.11111■■■1111111111111111111111■11111111111111111M ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ili ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111111MIN� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ME111111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■IMII•� 50■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIIIMI_� &ri&■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■© 9 �M��•11uiui••••••iuuulu■■■•u■••••i■■iuuu� 4 4.0% 96.0% 45 5.0% 92.0% I I%I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 4.0% 87.0% I2■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 2.0% 83.0% PCM&■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 5.0% 81.0% WALFAi I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 6 6.0% 76.0% 40 Wr WIC■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 6 6.0% 70.0% ►IIIIIII��■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■ 10 10.0% 64.0% (JPATI I JWA I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 8 8.0% 54.0% 12.*■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 4 4.0% 46.0% IIIA!!IIS II0■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IEll 13.0% 42.0% 35J ••■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 6.0% 26.0% III■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I© 3.0% 20.0% I fAI/I I I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IM 7.0% 17.0% III■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© 3.0% 10.0% 30�I�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l© 3.0% 5.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111MIIIII� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��® I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i 1.0% 2.0% 25r4■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111-- ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IM ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��_ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIIIIIMII� 20■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111111111111111111111111■■■1111110110111111111111111111111� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ MIIIIII® ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MMIll� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■u■■■■■■■MMIII� 15■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111111111111■■■■ 111111111111111■■■■■■®MM� FM! Date of Survey: 6/1012019 Start Time: 9:00 85th Percentile Speed: 43.5 50th Percentile Speed: 37.5 Weather: Sunny and Dry End Time: 10:00 15th Percentile Speed: 31.7 Road Condition: Good Posted Speed: 40 10 MPH Pace: 32-41 Street Class.: Class 2(Secondary Observer: EFI Number in Pace: 66 Conditions not Percent in Pace: 66.0% Apparent: 1 Perform Peak hour Turning Movement Counts Turning Movement count TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Prepared by:G.E.Traffic Surveys PROJECT NAME: City of Rosemead Olney St Study PROJECT NO: _ DATE: 4-Jun-19 Kids-School age pedestrian A-Adult pedestrian IB=bikes N-S STREET: Rio Hondo Avenue E-W STREET: Olney Street PED COUNT TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N-S EASTBOUND WESTBOUND . E-W North Leg South Leg East Lep West Leg LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL Adult Kids1B Adult KIds/B Adult Kids/13 Adult Kids18 07:00-07:15 2 2 6 8 16 3 7 10 07:15-07:30 1 2 2 2 7 4 15 19 2 07:30-07:45 4 2' 4 3 13 3 24 27 07:45-08:00 14 3 8 6 31 12 42 54 8 08:00-09:15 2 2 12 8 24 10 18 28 4 08:15.08:30 2 4 4 1 11 7 13 20 1 08:30-08:45 3 4 2 5 14 10 7 17 08:45.09:00 4 4 9 1 18 3 14 17 13:00-13:15 0 0 13:15-13:30 0 , 0 13:30-13:45 0I 0 13:45-14:00 0 0 14:00-14:15 0 0 14:15-14:30 0 0 14:30-14:45 0 0 14:45-15:00 0 : 0 16:00-16:15 4 4 9 2 19 11 9 20 16:15-16:30 3 2 6 6 17 3 6 9 I 16:30-18:45 5 1 5 3 14 7 8 15 1 15:45-17:00 8 6 7 4 25 8 8 16 17:00-17:15 6 6 12 3 27 13 7 20 17:15-17:30 5 3 14 4 26 11 9 20 1 17:30-17:45 3 9 13 2 27 10 14 24 17:45-18:00 2 6 17 2 27 3 11 14 1 k SB vehicles that made a U turn Turning Movement Count PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS Prepared by:G.E.Traffic Surveys I CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-AM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-AM ' 0 18 28 SR ST SL SR ST SL o EL WR 97 EL WR O ET 7:30-8:30 WT 0 ET WT O ER WL 32 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR O 22 11 _ CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-NOON ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-NOON O 0 0 _ _ _ SR ST SL SR ST SL. O EL WR 0 EL WR 0 ET 13:00-14:00 WT 0 ET WT O ER WL 0 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR O 0 0 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-PM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-PM O 13 46 SR ST EL SR ST SL O EL WR 38 EL WR O ET 16:45-17:45 WT 0 ET WT 0 ER WL 42 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR O 22 24 Turning Movement Count TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Prepared by:G.E.Traffic Surveys PROJECT NAME: City of Rosemead-Olney St Study PROJECT NO: DATE: 4-Jun-19 Kids-School age pedestrian A-Adult pedestrian B=bikes NS STREET: Temple City Boulevard E-W STREET: Olney Street qq PED COUNT TIME NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND I N-S EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND E-W North Leg South Leq East Leg West Leg LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL Adult KidslB Adult KidsfB Adult KIds/B Adult Kids/B 07:00-07:15 256 186 6 448 4 4 07:15-07:30 292 170 6 468 6 6 07:30-07:45 313 208 19 540 16 16 07:45-08:00 292 190 10 500 10 10 08:00-08:15 285 174 18 477 22 22 08:15-08:30 288 192 19 498 10 10 08:30-08:45 266 200 8 474 15 15 08:45-09:00 279 198 61 483 9 9 13:00-13:15 0 0 13:15-13:30 0 0 13:30-13:45 0 0 13:45-14:00 - • 0 0 14:00-14:15 0 0 14:15-14:30 I 0 0 14:30-14:45 , 0 0 14:40.15:00 0 0 16:00-16:15 234 231 10 475 6 6. 16:15-16:30 228 234 91 471 3 3' 16:30-16:45 247 210 7' 464 11 11 --- 18:45-17:00 255 243 14 512 3 3 17:00-17:15 264 230 19 513 10 10 17:15-17:30 279 287 17 583 3 3 17:30-17:45 294 211 22 527 5 5 17:45-18:00 304 253 121 569 5 1 5 " SB vehicles that made a U turn •I Turning Movement Count PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS Prepared by:G.E.Traffic Surveys CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-AM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-AM 73 764 0 SR ST SL SR ST SL o EL WR 0 EL WR 0 ET 7:30.8:30 WT 0 ET WT 58 ER WL 0 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR O 1178 0 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-NOON ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-NOON O 0 0 _ SR ST SL SR ST EL O EL WR 0 EL WR o ET 13:00-14:00 WT 0 ET WT 0 ER WL 0 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR o a a CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-PM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-PM 70 981 0 SR ST SL SR ST SL O EL WR 0 EL WR 0 ET 17:00-18:00 WY 0 Er WT 23 ER WL 0 ER WL _ NL NT NR NL NT NR 0 1141 0 _ Level of service analysis existing conditions AM Tue Jun 11, 2019 09:14:38 Page 1-1 City of Rosemead Traffic Calming Report Existing Conditions AM Peak Scenario Report Scenario: existing conditions AM Command: Existing Conditions Volume: Existing AM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: with project Trip Distribution: with project Paths: with project Routes: Default Route Configuration: Existing Conditions Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. existing conditions AM Tue Jun 11, 2019 09:14:38 Page 2-1 City of Rosemead Traffic Calming Report Existing Conditions AM Peak Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Rio Hondo at Olney A 9.1 0.092 A 9.1 0.092 + 0.000 DIV # 2 Temple City Blvd at Olney St C 15.3 0.143 C 15.3 0.143 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. existing conditions AM Tue Jun 11, 2019 09:14:38 Page 3-1 City of Rosemead Traffic Calming Report Existing Conditions AM Peak Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rio Hondo at Olney ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 6.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.1] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Rio Hondo/Ramona Blvd Olney St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0• 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module:Existing AM Peak Base Vol: 0 22 11 28 18 0 0 0 0 32 0 97 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 22 11 28 18 0 0 0 0 32 0 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 22 11 28 18 0 0 0 0 32 0 97 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 . 22 11 28 18 0 0 0 0 32 0 97 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx'xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 33 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 102 102 28 Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1592 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 902 792 1054 Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1592 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 890 778 1054 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.04 0.00 0.09 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx -xxxx 1008 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx - 9.1 ApproachLOS: . * * * A ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ! ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. existing conditions AM Tue Jun 11, 2019 09:14:38 Page 4-1 City of Rosemead Traffic Calming Report Existing Conditions AM Peak Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Temple City Blvd at Olney St • *******'************************************************************************* Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 15.3) ********************:************************************************************ Street Name: Temple City Blvd/I-10 WB Ramp Olney St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I 'II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights:' Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module:Existing AM Peak , Base Vol: 0 1178 0 0 764 73 0 0 58 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1178 0 0 764 73 0 0 58 0 0 0 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1178 0 0 764 73 0 0 58 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1178 0 0 764 . 73 0 0 58 0 0 0 I it II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:-xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I . II - II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 764 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 407 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 407 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.14 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.5 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * *' * * * * * C * * * . Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx, xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note:. Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. *******'************************************************************************* . Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. - existing conditions PM Tue Jun 11, 2019 09:15:34 Page 1-1 City of Rosemead Traffic Calming Report Existing Conditions PM Peak Scenario Report Scenario: existing conditions PM Command: Existing Conditions Volume: Existing PM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: with project Trip Distribution: with project Paths: with project Routes: Default Route Configuration: Existing Conditions Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. existing conditions PM Tue Jun 11, 2019 09:15:34 , Page 2-1 City of Rosemead Traffic Calming Report Existing Conditions PM Peak Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Rio Hondo at Olney A 9.3 0.050 A 9.3 0.050 + 0.000 D/V # 2 Temple City Blvd at Olney St C 17.7 0.075 C 17.7 0.075 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. existing conditions PM Tue Jun 11, 2019 09:15:34 Page 3-1 City of Rosemead Traffic Calming Report Existing Conditions PM Peak Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rio Hondo at Olney ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 5.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.3] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Rio Hondo/Ramona Blvd Olney St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module:Existing PM Peak Base Vol: 0 22 24 46 13 0 0 0 0 42 0 38 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 22 24 46 13 0 0 0 0 42 0 38 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 '22 24 46 13 0 0 0 0 42 0 38 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 22 24 46 13 0 0 0 0 42 0 38 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 46 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 139 139 34 Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1575 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 859 756 1045 Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1575 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 839 733 1045 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.04 I _ II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 926 xxxxx ,SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx' Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.3 ApproachLOS: * * * A ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. existing conditions PM Tue Jun 11, 2019 09:15:34 Page 4-1 City of Rosemead Traffic Calming Report Existing Conditions PM Peak Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *********.*********************************************************************** Intersection 112 Temple City Blvd at Olney St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 17.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Temple City Blvd/I-10 WB Ramp Olney St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R I II II II i Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II 11" . I Volume Module:Existing PM Peak Base Vol: 0 1141 0 0 981 70 0 0 23 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 114.1 0 0 981 70 0 0 23 0 0 0 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1141 0 0 981 70 0 0 23 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1141 0 0 981 70 0 0 23 0 0 0 I 11 II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 981 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 305 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 305 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.08 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 17.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * C * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 17.7 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEETS BACK OF QUEUE Page 1 of 4 LOCATION: Temple City Blvd DATE:6/19/19 Time:(07:00-08:00 am) 5 min DIRECTION SB Dir increments #Veh's #Veh's #Veh's #Veh #times #times Stopped making right Queue to Queue to Veh's Veh's waiting to turn at Loftus SB Loftus SB Queue to Queue to get on Olney and U Curb Lane Middle Loftus Marshall Freeway at turn to Lane SB SB Ramp Signal Freeway single lane at ramp 1 00-05 2 05-10 3 5,6,4 10-15 4 11,6, 19 15-20 5 9 20-25 6 4,5, 11,9, 16 25-30 7 30-35 8 35-40 9 40-45 10 45-50 11 50-55 12 7, 12,8 55-60 BACK OF QUEUE Page 2 of 4 LOCATION:Temple City Blvd DATE:6/19/19 Time:(08:00-09:00ain) 5 min DIRECTION SB Dir increments #Veh's #Veh's #Veh's #Veh #times #times Stopped making right Queue to Queue to Veh's Veh's waiting to turn at Loftus SB Loftus SB Queue to Queue to get on Olney and U Curb Lane Middle Loftus Marshall Freeway at turn to Lane SB SB Ramp Signal Freeway single lane at ramp 1 13, 19, 12,8 00-05 2 12, 13,9 05-10 3 22 10-15 4 11,15,9 15-20 5 6, 13,26 3 1 20-25 6 15,8, 10, 16 5,5 1,1 25-30 7 16,17,20, 6 2 1 30-35 8 , 35-40 9 40-45 10 45-50 11 50-55 12 55-60 BACK OF QUEUE Page 3 of 4 LOCATION:Temple City Blvd DATE:6/19/19 Time:(16:00-17:00) 5 min DIRECTION SB Dir increments #Veh's #Veh's #Veh's #Veh #times #times Stopped making right Queue to Queue to Veh's Veh's waiting to turn at Loftus SB Loftus SB Queue to Queue to get on Olney and U Curb Lane Middle Loftus Marshall Freeway at turn to Lane SB SB Ramp Signal Freeway single lane at ramp 1 00-05 2 05-10 3 10-15 4 15-20 5 20-25 6 25-30 • 7 30-35 8 35-40 9 40-45 10 45-50 11 50-55 12 55-60 BACK OF QUEUE Page 4 of 4 LOCATION:Temple City Blvd DATE:6/19/19 Time:(17:00-18:00) 5 min DIRECTION SB Dir increments #Veh's #Veh's #Veh's #Veh #times #times Stopped making right Queue to Queue to Veh's Veh's waiting to turn at Loftus SB Loftus SB Queue to Queue to get on Olney and U Curb Lane Middle Loftus Marshall Freeway at turn to Lane SB SB Ramp Signal Freeway single lane at ramp 1 15 00-05 2 6, 11,9 05-10 3 17 10-15 4 21, 11 15-20 5 -' 29, 11 7,8 1, 1 20-25 6 25-30 7 13,7 2 11 30-35 8 12, 10,8 9 1 35-40 9 40-45 10 12,23,19 1, 9 1, 1 45-50 11 10,8 50-55 12 27,7 2 1 55-60 Traffic Commission Meeting November 7,2019 Page 4 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 COURTESY NOTICE Traffic Commission Meeting November 7,2019 Page 5 of 5 ° ®SES `AD Traffic Commission Courtesy Notification OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Thursday,November 7,2019,at the hour of 7:00 p.m.,or soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, e Rosemead Traffic Commission will hold a public meeting in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 8838 E.Valley Boulevard,Rosemead; alifornia 91770,to discuss safety improvements along a portion of Olney Street. ou are being notified of this meeting because your property is within close proximity to the location. We encourage your comments garding traffic safety in this area. Citizens' wishing to comment may do so by either attending the Traffic Commission meeting, or by :nding a comment letter by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday,November 7,2019. Written comments must be addressed to: City of Rosemead Public Works Department 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead,California 91770 Attention: Mr.Chris Daste,Director of Public Works 'ritten comments may be mailed to the above address, emailed to cdaste@citvofrosemead.ora or faxed to (626) 307-9218. Again, only tters received by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday,November 7,2019,will be accepted. We appreciate your concern for traffic safety in the City of osemead. Should you have any questions regarding this letter,please contact the Director of Public Works,Chris Daste,at 626-569-2158. For information please call: Para obtener más informacibn,favor de llamar al: De biet them chi net,xin goi: 626-569-2150 Proposed Traffic Safety Improvements on Olney Street ro.c — F--;: ii:. ' S #1,. a -." ,o �a off,+. '_. .F1' "-,"'-if, 4'�*^ : ;1;;:''''.::L," :"- in ` 1 L yJ l\ ' .. rL °4 � 4Is 4. : ky-- i _ a , • 21 1 : ....,,_ _,,,,, , .. ...ior,„ i. 4 e. telt 1:1Y -°,. .d am x - a pis}g��'ppppaa a a:, 719 t 7 „-e t a'j -t*-1 -_. � '.r ,."z" Mi .. .w , 4.* ''"--"-77 q+i f.' .:s -'I's • , � - ,tea `,,''..7 ', abs • 1 ' , , ' y ir,, '- ;y ,� �}..�4 k' ,, --moi. ;: met a;l 'T , { .3`r ,r 1.. ry ' .-- J X7.1 s i,, .=t'. .t: -. x rte. `fie -10 --11'`, -K} ;, + ' ;.w , � ;+ t rn 0 ,- ..w 'ff e* " .1 ��,�° ti, "'r *-",4.r`` a__,.... .,'''''.2•10. w 0. oat a ,� }' Yt,rt ! tT '. •^mss �: t Y-» >0 i x. ,,ten..�.w +*�y _ ..R ° 'q,m. 3T - `j aT� t- ,rr,p4 r x 447 ,. `d.e ' 'cx�i+• Aj."n 4 v ia. ° ---- .1.,:,� 4---" -.. ..1F1-. '^r�'it sr.Z a°J°,.. in .. '� azti4 g _ M .F G KAt _ CIVIC PRIDE obO'RSA fE0,959 Attachment B Draft Traffic Commission Minutes of November 7, 2019 Minutes of the ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING November 7,2019 The regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by Chair Masuda at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 8838 E.Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Ly INVOCATION: Chair Masuda PRESENT: Chair Masuda,Vice-Chair Ornelas,Commissioner Lim and Commissioner Ly ABSENT: Commissioner Quintanilla r STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public Works Chris Daste Enginee'i ng Consultant Elie Farah, and Administrative Analyst Silvia Llamas 5"k ,* 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS . Tom Dobashi,resident,expressed concern with unsafe condition for bicyclist riding sout` bo d on Walnut Grove Avenue,between Valley Blvd and Hellman Avenue. He requested having signs installed to remind drivers to share the road with bicyclists. .4 1140 2. CONSENT CALENDAR . -,.- sst NONE 3. OLD BUSINESS ,, �, A. REVIEW OFTRAFFFIC STUDS''gF R OLNEY STRE T BETWEEN RIO HONDO AVENUE AND TEMPLE ✓1X'48 ..�.s�k.� `'r�crt CITY BOULEVARD tsTHE CITU OF ROSEMEAD ,tea � � ,,, � .� 44, Staff proui ed}�a�`bnef descriptionrof he item and Conssultant$Traffic Engineer Elie Farah presented a PowerPoint presentation on the studies that wererconducted. 43,- ..* Commis o°ner Ly asked for cla ifieation onnthe direction that had the 83%cut thru traffic on Olney Street. Staff responded -t it was the west bound traffic. Commissioner Ly asked staff had numbers for east bound traffic. Staff responded that there was0%scut thru east bound traffic. r Commissioner Ly also asked for clarification on the recommendation given for phase 1,that suggests the Sheriff Station to provide periodic enforcement during off peak hours when traffic can move more freely. Mr.Ly also asked what would be considered off peak hours. Staff responded 4 p.m.to 6 p.m. are considered off peak hours. Commissioner Ly asked if having police enforcement during peak hours would help reduce drivers from coming onto Olney Street and making a U-Turn to get onto the freeway. Staff responded that it would help. Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting i Meeting Minutes of November 7,2019 Page 1 of 3 Commissioner Ly asked if the vehicles speeding on Olney Street are residents or cut thru vehicles. Staff responded that it would be difficult to determine if they are residents or it's the cut thru vehicles. Commissioner Lim asked if there's a four-way stop on Ellis Lane and Marshall Street. Staff confirmed that Ellis Lane and Marshall Street is a four-way stop. Commissioner Lim asked regarding the level of service, if staff could explain what the grades mean in terms of A vs. C. Mr. Farah explained that an A grade is good and C needs work. Commissioner Lim asked regarding phase 2,where would staff recommend installing feedback signs. Staff suggested installing feedback signs on long segments. Commissioner Ornelas mentioned that if they did a full closure on Olney Street people living on Temple City Blvd will have problems backing out of their driveways. .` Staff informed the Commissioners that further studies will need to be done to determine,iKthey can block out a certain amount of space to allow the residents who live along_Temple`City Blvd. to back outsafely onto Olney Street, if they were to do a partial closure z � 3 Chair Masuda mentioned if there was a full closure on Olney Street, people who live west of Temple City Blvd. above Loftus Drive would only have the option to get otto the left lane'and make a left onto Loftus Drive to avoid getting onto the freeway. Mr. Masuda asked w}at the level of service for vehicles would be traveling south bound Temple City Blvd. if they do a full closure on Olney(Street. Staff informed the Commissioners that Caltrans may need to,do a time signal adjustment and there may can be vehicles backed up all the way to Marshall Street Mr Masada also askedrif they investigated how the Loftus Drive west bound traffic would be affected when trying to make'a left turn onto Temple'City Blvd. Staff suggested-putting a 'Keep Clear"to allow o MTemple City Blvd.to allow traffic to clear prior to the Loftus Drive traffic makingga left Chair Masuda asked for}clarification onthe location where the transition marking will begin. Staff informed the Commissioners that the transition marking will begin on Marshall Street and they will need to do further research because vehicles also park on the street. Commissioner Lim motioned, seconded by Commissioner Ly to recommend to the City Council a partial closure on Olney Street and closing the east bound on ramp lane, along with placing the phase 2 speed radar feedback sign on Olney Street. Votes resulted in: Yes: Lim, Ly, Masuda and Ornelas No: None Abstain: None Absent: Quintanilla Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Meeting Minutes of November 7,2019 Page 2 of 3 4. STAFF REPORT , NONE 5. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Commissioner Ly requested putting Mr.Dobashi's item on the next meeting agenda to discuss speeding and safety concerns on the south bound lane of Walnut Grove Avenue. Chair Masuda asked for an update on the outcome of the bicycle policy. 5. ADJOURNMENT - ;ra The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. The next Traffic Commission meeting is scheduled for December 5, 2019 at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, located at 8838,East Valley Boulevard. 44 1 G�F4 ,,,.,,,,,,,,c.:-±'",iltilY Howard Masuda >k ' Chair, ATTEST: < { '' - Chris Daste �> , Director of Public Works _ , ;. a t fir. =i, " f 4' .. ry ty. .kY.' ,x h` f"$ ,, 'moi 5 S,- f t. C`.. 6'. 1134 ''VY,',". t,-;‘;',/V-,, .1.:1,,*, , 2 . `- r Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Meeting Minutes of November 7,2019 Page 3 of 3