Loading...
CC - 08-22-61v ~ • j CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD$ CALIFORNIA CITY COUNCIL Minutes of August 22, 1961 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rosemead was held in the Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Andersen at 8:02 o'clock p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Jackman. The Invocation was delivered by Bishop Ray 0. Harper of the Latter Day Saints Church. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmen: Andersen, Jackman, Lowrey, Phinney, Stead. Absent: Councilmen: None. Ex officio: Boyko, Farrell, Stump, Pederson, Phillips. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - August 8, 1961. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Andersen, and unanimously carried that the minutes of August 8, 1961, be approved as printed. 4. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. There were none. 5. ORDINANCE NO. 75. AMENDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS. (2nd Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD REGULATING PARKING AT CERTAIN LOCATIONS AND AMENDING THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Jackman, and unanimously carried that Ordinance No. 75 be read by title only. City Administrator Farrell read Ordinance No. 75 by title only and explained this ordinance was discussed at the last meeting regarding the twelve (12) minute parking zone in front of the City Hall. It was moved by'Lowrey, second by Phinney, that Ordinance No. 75 be adopted. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Andersen, Jackman, Lowrey, Phinney, Stead. Noes: None. Absent: None. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 61-57. ESTABLISHING TAX RATES. ROSEMEAD LIGHTING DISTRICTS. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD LEVYING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TAX WITHIN THE ROSEMEAD STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT. City Administrator Farrell explained that this Resolution No. 61-57 is for the purpose of levying a special assess- ment tax on land, exclusive of improvements, within the Rosemead Street Lighting District for the fiscal year 1961-62 as follows: L~ev1 Tax Rate Zone 1 $ 4,396. Zone 2 5,085. 1.2309 Zone 2A 400. .9716 Zone 3 Zone 4 17,455. .3301 8-22-61 The Zones are located as follows: Zone 1 - The central business district on Valley Blvd. The cost 37 construction was somewhat less than expected. Zone 2 - Lower ends of Valley Blvd. The cost. is some- what eTss than the estimate, also the State is sharing the cost. Zone 2A - Garvey Avenue area; Zone - South of the freeway, Temple City Blvd. and Lower Azusa Road. These are unlighted areas. However, the • City has received petitions from property owners south of the freeway indicating the desire for street lighting. Zone 4 - All of the remaining portions of the Rosemead Lighting istrict. It was moved by Phinney, second by Andersen,and unanimously carried that Resolution no. 61-57 be read in full. City Administrator Farrell read Resolution No, 61-57 in full and stated that Zone 3 should read no tax levy and rate. It was moved by Jackman, second by Lowrey, that Resolution No. 61-57 be adopted. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Andersen, Jackman, Lowrey, Phinney, Stead. Noes: None. Absent: None. • Mayor Andersen stated that the Council would discuss Zone 3 at this time. Attorney Boyko stated that Zone 3 could be set up as portions (for example Zone 3A, B, etc.) to handle each area individu- ally as they request lighting improvements in their particu- lar areas. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Andersen, and unanimously carried that the Council refer the matter of Zone 3, Lighting District to the City Administrator for a complete study and report back to the City Council. 7. RESOLUTION N0. 61-58. INCREASING HISTORICAL COMMITTEE TO SEVEN MEMBERS. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD INCREASING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE HISTORICAL COMMITTEE AND AMENDING RESOLUTION N0. 80. It was moved by Phinney, second by Lowrey, and unanimously carried that Resolution No. 61-58 be read by title only. City Administrator Farrell read Resolution No. 61-58 and explained that this resolution would amend Resolution No. 80 thus increasing the Historical Committee from five to seven members. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Phinney, and unanimously carried that Resolution No. 61-58 be adopted. 8. FINAL APPROVAL VALLEY BOULEVARD SIGNAL MODIFICATION AND HIGH INTENSITY LIGHTING. go City Administrator Farrell stated that this project has been discussed many times and that the costs are increasing with time. The total estimated cost is $22,800, for the City's share and $35,900, for the State's share, also the State will bear 100% cost of this project for the intersection of Rosemead Blvd, and Valley Blvd. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Jackman that the Council approve this project for $22,800 and the Mayor be authorized to execute this agreement. Roll call vote as follows: Ayes: Andersen, Jackman, Lowrey, Phinney, Stead. Noes: None. Absent: None. -2- 8=Z2=6} • 9. PARK STUDY REPORT City Administrator Farrell explained the contents of this report and stated that some of the information was received late, therefore the Council has not had time to study this report. Attorney Boyko stated that this is strictly new territory and would like time to study this report thoroughly. . Mayor Andersen stated if there were no objections this matter would be referred until next meeting pending the Attorney's study and any additional information which may be useful. There were no objections. 10. COMMISSIONER COMPENSATION REPORT City Administrator Farrell referred to the report of which copies had been given to the Councilmen. This report showed only one City (Commerce) as paying any compensation to Com- missioners. Administrative Assistant Pederson reported that Planning Commissioners unanimously agreed that they desired no com- pensation. He further stated that all expenses pertaining to meetings should be turned into the City Hall office for • reimbursement. After short discussion Mayor Andersen instructed Administrative Assistant Pederson to inform the Planning Commission of this report and discussion. NEW BUSINESS: 11. RESOLUTION NO. 61-59. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $7,376.82 DEMANDS NUMBERS 1048 THROUGH 1071. Mayor Andersen stated if there were no objections this reso- lution would be read by title only with a summary of expenditures presented. There were no objections. City Administrator Farrell read Resolution No. 61-59 by title only and presented a summary of expenditures. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Jackman that Resolution No. 61-59 be adopted. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Andersen, Jackman, Lowrey, Phinney, Stead. Noes; None. Absent: None. 12. AUTHORITY TO PROCEED. CHAPTER 27 1911 ACT. S&H CODE. RALPH STREET AND RIO HONDO AVENUE. Administrative Assistant Pederson stated that this item is similar to the one on Bentel Avenue and DeAdalena Street, of which the Council took action on July 25. • It was moved by Lowrey, second by Andersen and unanimously carried that the staff be authorized to proceed with the necessary action under the Street and Highway Code 5876. 13. ACCEPTANCE OF SANITARY SEWER. NORWOOD PLACE. City Administrator Farrell stated we have received an offer for dedication of a sanitary sewer from Mr, and Mrs. Kloster on Norwood Place. The City Engineer recommends this dedication. -3- 8-22-61 It was moved by Andersen, second by Lowrey and unanimously carried that this offer of dedication be accepted. 14. COMMUNICATIONS: A. California Disaster Office - Conference September 12, 1961. City Administrator Farrell stated this is an invitation to attend "The Civil Defense Economic Stabilization Conference" • on Tuesday, September 12, 1961, from 8:30 to 5:00 at the Ambassador Hotel. Councilman Lowrey stated he would be able to attend. It was moved by Stead, second by Phinney and unanimously carried that three (3) Councilmen, one (1) staff member and two (2) Planning Commissioners attend this conference. 15. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. Mr. Shab, 8633 East Valley Boulevard, stated that the City has accomplished very much in such a short time and would like to commend the Council for doing such a good job. 16. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS: A. California Highway Patrol Meeting: City Administrator Farrell reported that he met with the California Highway Patrol office in Sacramento to request an extension to January 1, 1962, for California Highway Patrol traffic enforcement. He also contacted Senator Richard Richards to try for an extension to the end of the fiscal year. To date, we have not received a definite answer as to what date they will accept. if we do not receive an answer by the end of the week the Council will need to take action in order to get this matter on the agenda of the next Board of Supervisors meeting. B. City Hall Alteration Costs: City Administrator Farrell explained this memorandum in • detail regarding the costs of City Hall alterations. C. Street Widths: City Administrator Farrell stated a tour had been conducted Monday night to look at some of the streets in question. Mayor Andersen stated if there were no objections we would discuss each street individually and decide the width. There were no objections. Hart Avenue - 36 feet to Steele Street and 30 feet from Steele Street to dead-end. Steele Street - 36 feet from Rosemead Boulevard to Rio Hondo Avenue. • Steele Street - 36 feet west of Ivar Avenue Edmond Drive - 36 feet Walnut Grove to Muscatel Guess Street - 30 feet Rosemead to Rio Hondo Ralph Street - 30 feet Rosemead to Rio Hondo Newby Avenue - 36 feet Rosemead to Mission -4- 0 8-22-61 Charlotte - 36 feet Marshall to Valley (Only East side of street is in the city with exception of 3700 block) D. City Limit Signs: City Administrator Farrell stated we had received a lease • from the Southern Pacific Company regarding the placement of two (2) City Limit Signs, one at the east City Limit on Valley Boulevard and the other at the north City Limit on Rosemead Boulevard both on Southern Pacific right-of- way. The charge for these two signs would be $81.00 per yr. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Phinney and unanimously carried that the Mayor be authorized to negotiate and sign this lease, E. Zone Change Case No, I. Administrative Assistant Pederson stated that the Planning Commissioners' action on the zone change for Grand Avenue are not to be affected. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Jackman, that Zone Change Case No. 1 be referred back to the Planning Commission for further suggestions and study and that the Planning Ccnsultant be asked to furnish a written recommendation to the Planning Commission. Motion carried, Councilman Lowrey asked if a Public Hearing could be held at a City Council meeting next time. Attorney Boyko stated he would check to see if it could be handled this way. The area proposed for change of zone could possibly be modified or another public hearing held making sure the applicants are present. F. Southern California Edison Tour: City Administrator Farrell stated he received an invitation from the Southern California Edison Company to tour their facilities in the Big Creek area on August 30, 31, and September 1. It was moved by Lowrey, second by Andersen, that the City Administrator be authorized to make this tour at no expense to the City. Motion carried, G. Councilman Stead asked when the completed budget would be ready. City Administrator Farrell stated it is ready for typing and will be done as soon as the Economic Survey is completed which will be next week. it was moved by Andersen, second by Lowrey and unanimously carried that the meeting adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 11:05 o'clock P.M. Next regular meeting September 12, 1961. MAYOR IT CLERK -5-