CC - Item 5A - Rosemead Local Economic Stimulus Plan in Response to Coronavirus (COVID-19)ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
ONCIIL
FROM: GLORIA MOLLEDA, CITY MANAGER _. .0
N �
DATE: May 12, 2020
SUBJECT: ROSEMEAD LOCAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS PLAN IN RESPONSE TO
CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)
SUMMARY
The City of Rosemead declared an emergency due to Coronavirus (COVID-19) on March 13,
2020. Since that time, the economy has drastically changed, and businesses in Rosemead have
been greatly impacted by COVID-19 and the State's Stay -at -Home Order. The Order mandated
non-essential businesses to cease in-person operations and remain closed to the public. For those
essential businesses allowed to remain open, it has not been "business as usual" and for many,
the modifications made to continue to operate have impacted profitability and viability to
continue to stay open for business. Further, many Rosemead residents have also been impacted
by unemployment and loss of wages due to COVID-19.
In response to this crisis, the City of Rosemead, may consider implementing a local economic
stimulus plan subsidized through General Fund Reserves. A local stimulus plan will accomplish
three main objectives; 1) provide immediate economic relief to struggling businesses,
employees, and residents; 2) create a stopgap when businesses cannot secure assistance through
other federal or state resources; and 3) provide a mechanism for the local economy in Rosemead
to recover from the impacts of COVID-19.
Recently, the State of California unveiled several actions that will begin to chart a path to
reopening the economy and recovery: 1) April 14, 2020, six key indicators that will guide
California's thinking for when and how to modify the Stay -at -Home and other Orders were
announced; 2) April 17, 2020, a state Task Force on Business and Jobs Recovery was formed;
and 3) on April 28, 2020, four stages for easing the Stay -at -Home Order were presented, with the
probability that some non-essential businesses would be allowed to reopen in the coming weeks,
but with changes to prevent the spread of COVID-19. As the State begins to move through each
stage, keeping in mind the indicators to re -open the economy safely, and when the County of Los
Angeles Public Health Officer is ready to ease and, eventually, lift the Safer at Home Order, the
expectation is that businesses and development in Rosemead may need assistance and incentives
to reinvest in the City and move forward in the new economy.
AGENDA ITEM 5.A
City Council Meeting
May 12, 2020
Page 2 of 5
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Discuss a potential local economic stimulus plan;
2. Review proposed programs and activities submitted as Attachment A; and
3. Provide direction to staff on which activities, if any, to include in a local economic
stimulus plan.
DISCUSSION
In December 2019, a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 was first detected overseas. Due to
its high rate of transmissibility it quickly spread and has caused catastrophic outbreaks in over
100 countries worldwide impacting not only public health but the economy. On January 31,
2020, United States Secretary of Health and Human Services declared a public health emergency
in response to COVID-19. During this time the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) supported States in conducting contact investigations of confirmed COVID-19 cases
identified within the United States.
The State of California has been steadfast in putting measures in place to protect the public from
the spread of COVID-19. As such, the County of Los Angeles has followed Orders placed by the
State Governor, Gavin Newsom, and has enacted several Orders for public protection locally;
those Orders have directly impacted businesses in Los Angeles County, including essential and
non-essential businesses located in Rosemead.
On March 16, 2020, Los Angeles County Public Health Officer ordered:
• All restaurants and permanent food facilities must limit their services to preparing and
offering food to patrons through delivery service, pick-up, take-out or drive thru only.
The following venues were ordered to be closed effective immediately:
o Bars and night clubs that do not serve food
o Gyms and fitness centers
o Movie theaters, live performance theaters, bowling alleys and arcades
o Wineries, Breweries, and Tap Rooms that provide tasting
On March 19, 2020, the County of Los Angeles Public Health Officer, to comply with Executive
Order N-33-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom, ordered Safer at Home:
• All individuals to stay home or their place of residence except to travel to and from
essential business; and
City Council Meeting
May 12, 2020
Page 3 of 5
• All businesses to cease in-person operations and remain closed to the public, unless the
business is defined as an Essential Business by the Order, thus ordering the closure of
non-essential retail businesses.
The impact to businesses by COVID-19 has not been a localized issue. To assist businesses and
people of the United States, on March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act (CARES Act) was signed into Public Law 116-136 by the President to respond to
the growing effects of COVID-19. The CARES Act provides fast and direct economic assistance
for American workers and families, small businesses, and preserves jobs for American
industries. However, this national stimulus package was not funded at a sufficient level to cover
the needs of businesses across the nation. The small business loan package made available was
$349 billion, which was quickly exhausted by April 16, 2020. The Economic Injury Disaster
Loan (EIDL) and EIDL Advances, which would have provided an advance to a pending loan of
up to $10,000 to small business owners experiencing temporary loss of revenue, was no longer a
resource to small businesses due to available appropriations funding. A subsequent infusion of
$484 billion was approved by the Senate on April 21, 2020; however, there are many challenges
in accessing this funding for the local small business owner.
The UCLA Anderson Forecast, which has provided forecasts for the economies of California and
the United States for 68 years, for the first time in its history published an updated forecast
between its regularly scheduled quarterly releases in March because of the escalating effects of
the COVID-19 pandemic which has notably taken a toll on the economy. On March 16, 2020,
the UCLA Anderson Forecast economists announced that the US economy has entered a
recession. Moreover, the recession is expected to be more severe in California than for the nation
overall because of California's larger proportion of economic activity in tourism and trans -
Pacific transportation. The California unemployment rate is expected to rise to 6.3% by the end
of 2020 and continue to increase into 2021 with an estimated average of 6.6%. By the first
quarter of 2021, California is expected to lose more than 280,000 payroll jobs with more than
one-third of those in the leisure and hospitality, and transportation and warehousing sectors.
Additionally, the Public Policy Institute of California, has stated that recent forecasts have
identified several "at risk" sectors: accommodations and food service; arts, entertainment, and
recreation; administrative and support services, especially employment services; transportation
and warehousing; mining and oil/gas extraction; and agriculture.
Rosemead has over 600 businesses (55% of all businesses in the City) that fall in the "at risk"
sectors listed above, and 52% of those are businesses with sole proprietorship, according to
Rosemead Business License data. These businesses are likely small "mom and pop" shops with
limited resources as compared to corporate owned businesses. Additionally, according to 2010
Census Bureau data, Rosemead is home to almost 8,000 residents employed in those "at risk"
sectors, equating to 14% of the City's population. Although all businesses could use economic
relief in a time like this, the small family owned businesses, and those employed in the "at risk'
sectors will be impacted the most and would benefit the most from a local economic stimulus
plan.
City Council Meeting
May 12, 2020
Page 4 of 5
Through the CARES Act, the City of Rosemead did receive a special allocation of Community
Development Block Grant Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) funds in the amount of $443,682. The City
is currently undergoing the prescribed process to add it to the budget and build out programs (for
residents and businesses) that will meet the intent of this funding to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to coronavirus. The City's CDBG-CV special allocation will make available some
funding for business (forgivable) loans, but it is not enough to make a substantial impact
considering all the businesses in Rosemead that will need economic relief.
If Council desires, a local economic stimulus plan funded through the General Fund Reserves
would augment the CDBG-CV CARES Act programs and further minimize the impact to the
Rosemead economy. Moreover, a local plan may serve as a catalyst for development and allow
Rosemead to begin to recover from the effects of the pandemic by offering reduced fees to
incentivize developers who may not feel inclined to invest in an unstable economy, as an
example. We have begun to see the negative impacts to businesses and residents but the damage
to the local economy we are seeing now is just a glimpse of what is to come. However, given the
fact that the City will be facing significant financial deficits as a result of COVID-19 itself, cash
management may become a very real issue which Council will need to consider when deciding
whether to pursue a local economic stimulus plan with General Fund Reserves.
For Council's consideration, staff has developed a robust menu of options that includes a variety
of potential programs and activities that would help business owners, developers, and residents at
an estimated budget of $1.51M, Attachment A. This list is not intended to be all inclusive or
final, instead it is a starting point for Council discussion. Staff recommends Council discuss a
potential local economic stimulus plan and its impact on City finances and provide direction to
staff on which potential programs and activities should be further explored and developed.
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed programs and activities developed for the local economic stimulus plan would
require a total investment of approximately $1,507,000 from the City's General Fund Reserves
as a direct cost of $1,118,000 and indirect cost (waivers, reductions and deferments) of
$389,000. Some activities in the attached plan (3, 4, 5, and 6) call for fee reductions and waivers,
this would be the indirect cost to the City since it is revenue that would not be collected. The
City would expend $1,118,000.
STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT
The local economic stimulus plan implements the "Key Organizational Goals" of ensuring the
City's continued financial viability by actively pursuing quality economic development; and
enhance public safety and quality of life.
City Council Meeting
May 12, 2020
Page 5 of 5
Submitted by:
X!dgelica F usto-Lupo
Director of Community Development
Prepared by:
Li �ucia�MQina-Whittaker
Attachment A: Rosemead Local Economic Stimulus Plan Menu of Options
Attachment A
Rosemead Local Economic Stimulus Plan
Menu of Options
rZ
°
Ts
Cd
+,
�
~
U
O
N
N
� cd
' �
cd N
0
,�, ,�
ul
cn
a�
Qr
O V
o�z
'ice+ N
c.
�.
4
NCd
u
S
ul ':$
O
Ste" 00
Gi} dj cd
O
Cd
to
° N
69 N
-O 'rJ
N 'C
'o
° Cj
.L
p^"
cd c
-1
U
cn vUi p N
N
yc?"
Um
Cd
c�
C%
0
°
0
c° •� *'
°'r.
0 U
Cd
i"' U
ocn
U
U
'o
o 4.
p
+ �." 0
cd
O cd
U¢ bA
q N cn bg
to
O b
O O
.�
'C
�
1-4
1104O
N
C)
�O �—
�� N
4�
N
o � o a�
° N
SOU
0
Lr) °`.s�Ln
00
to
� Ove
o � �
O
O
o N vii
M
�O
--
MC/)Cd
O cn v�
N
c�
N
N
+
+
cd"cd
�,
��iJo
'0
'd
O
o
o
Cf)
+
+
+
°
�
N � �
+
�
�Cd17,
sN.
•� bA �
rn
�
�
•r+
sgs
ami
c)
v'
En
°s
0,
0,s9
U
Q.��✓422
�
es
0 0
0
o
0
O
0
0
o
0
o
0
o p
o
o
�
0
o
0
00Mo
o
00N
O
z
�uq�
GS
4
cn
cn
U)
M
41
a
El
CO °
rd o En
�, °
w
a�
ul
cn
'
ori
Q4A�a
O
r�
N
raw
0 o
T
= z
'ck
41 N
o
N
--
N
m
4
vi
06
0
O
0
0
00
R
w0
� o
�
O
Cd
cd
0 0
ro on
Cd
cd
cd
��"
o
5
°
°
0
cn
0
•�
0
N
O
0
�
bA U
' o
�4
ul
H
3a
0
"d
°Cj
—
y
°
En
U
°'
un
O U
U
�j
O
+L 4.4
^d
U
O
a
N
Cc'
N
41
0 O
N`
P-! ' bA
O
�iO
U
U
s
0
N O
N
O
�.
O bc
�
°
Cd
+
O
y 69
boo
ul
N
U
Cid+
N --
"
O
Cd
O0
.�
-
� 1>4�
c
O"�
U
6's
6~4
o o
lun,
0
CO
o
Cd
cd
> ° °'
��
o
cd
S44
Cd �
E-
bA
64
0
°
;--4 cd
'd
Q"cn
U
�C)
O
W
O
`�-
U
cri�-+°
.O
ul
"d
o1
° m
OM
U
o
Cd
14,'Qo�
i-1
4UP1
a�
o Ts��.�
cg
O1
C) U
cd O
N
�." O
O
O
�
o
N
q
°�' 0
�
U
�
a�
w
O
O
C/)
0
10
'p
c
U
°
cd
o
bo
o
I
•
~
co
41
O
O
tt
�, 69
64
IDS
NU
>
U°
1064
i/) ¢,6�9�64
O
Cd
O
O
°
6&4
r s
6�9
6g
6Ni9
bA
ted
O 4
O
0
�O
In
ul N
C�
U
O
°
a
cd O
U
Cj
697-,..,i
6oMjH.D6�F}b4
ti
UO
O
O
0
O
o
d
C)
L
z
64
6g
C-)
0
H
N
bA S�
� •o
GJ
UO+"
Cd
C)
Cd
0
9 0
.•�
�q
x(�U
t
off'
Cd
0
O
0
0
00
R
w0
� o
�
0 0
�?
o
4"i
0
ul
cn
°
+ r
•, 'i -i 'fj
cn
0
•�
0
N
o
�4
U
3a
0
"d
°Cj
—
y
0 vi "d
O.
O U
C, � 'CS
O cd
N
41
o °Cd
U
U
Q•o
d O
o O O
O
O
U
P.�N
U
F
Cd
x¢
Cd
�M F
c
O"�
6~4
o o
U
CO
o
o
O.�
> °
> ° °'
��
°q o�
M
64
'd
Q"cn
U
�C)
�"
0 ova.
a\
O
`�-
+cn
.O
•--•�
o1
° m
OM
U
o
Cd
14,'Qo�
i-1
4UP1
y•ti
o Ts��.�
06
O1
° o d
ori
o O
En
�
U
a�
I�
O
O
C/)
0
10
'p
}
6
cd
o
bo
O
Cd
•
~
°
41
O
O
tt
�, 69
64
IDS
NU
>
U°
1064
i/) ¢,6�9�64
O
O
O
O
6&4
r s
6�9
6g
6Ni9
bA
ted
O 4
O
0
�O
In
U
O
°
a
cd O
U
Cj
O
ti
UO
O
w0
� o
�
0 0
�?
o
4"i
0
ul
cn
cn
U
0
N
�4
3a
0
U
0
N
41
U
o
bA
U
P.�N
U
U
O
M
64
ul
a\
+cn
•--•�
r •
N
VUGH
i-1
4UP1
06
O1
Cd
o
ocn
o�zs W
N
bO0
"
r
VM
4
O 04
U
°UUri�
�
N M
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED LOCAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS
PLAN FEE SCHEDULE
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FEES
PROPOSED LOCAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS PLAN FEE SCHEDULE
(All proposed fee reductions or waivers sunset after one year.)
General Plan Amendment
$2,000 + $50 each
additional parcel
Conditional Use Permit
$1,320$660
Lot Line Adjustment
$225
Landscape Review
Cost + 10%
Tentative Parcel Map
$1,385+ $100/lot
Tentative Tract Map
$1,385+
$100/lot
Single Family Residential Variance
$975
Other Variances
$1,375
Zone Changes
$1,700 + $50 each
additional parcel
Municipal Code Amendment
$2,750
Design Review: Single Family Home
$800
Design Review: Multi Family (3 or More Units)
$000 $500
Design Review: Sign Design Review
$880 $400
Design Review: Master Sign Program
$800 $400
Design Review: New Nonresidential Structures
$1,540$770
Design Review: Residential Commercial Mixed -Use
$1,540$770
Design Review: Remodel with Additions to Nonresidential Structures
$-900$450
Design Review: Fagade or Site Improvement for Nonresidential
$800 $400
Projects Only
Review of Conditional Use Permit (Maximum 2 site inspections)
$225
Modification of Entitlements (Discretionary), commercial prjs. only
$900$400
Planned Development Review
$1,290$600
Covenants/Agreements Cost + 10%
Relocation Impact Report (mobile home parks) $1,500
Specific Plan Review (In-house)
Non-residential or Mixed Use $700 per review
Residential - 2 or less units (maximum 3 reviews) $225 per dwelling
unit
Residential - 3 or more units $700 per review
Specific Plan Review (Outsource) Cost + 10%
Specific Plan Amendment Cost + 10%
Other Public Hearing Requests (modifications) $980
Other (LA County Clerk recording fee, subject to LA County fee Fee subject to LA
schedule) County Fee
Schedule
Other Planning Items:
Pre -Application (optional)
$500 (one review
per project)
With Workshop Noticing
$300(one workshop
per project)
Entitlement Plan Check Modification Fee
$600
(Ministerial)
Publication Fee
$599 $250
Expediting Fee
$6,500
Entitlement Extensions
$300 each
Residential Site Plan Review (maximum 3 reviews)
$225 per dwelling
unit
Residential Tenant/Site Improvement/No New Sq.
$70
Ft.
Non-residential Tenant/Site Improvement/No New
$225
Sq. Ft.
Non-residential Site Plan Review (maximum 3
$A8 $350
reviews)
Page 2 of 4
$25
Lot Coverage Review (i.e. landscape and
hardscape)
$25
Mechanical Elements Review
$25
Fence Plan Review
Sign Plan Review
$225
Water Efficient Landscape Review
$225
Oak Tree Permit
$800
Negative Declaration Fee (Not including County
Cost + 10%
charges)
Mitigated Negative Declaration (Not including
Cost + 10%
County charges)
Categorical Exemption Fee
$90
EIR Plus Outside Consultant (Not including County
Cost + 10%
charges)
Mitigation Monitoring
Cost + 10%
Other Environmental Reviews/Documents
Cost + 10%
Administrative Determination
$450
Administrative Use Permit
$500
Density Bonus (i.e. application, document review,
Cost + 10%
etc.)
Development Agreement
Cost + 10%
Joint/Off-Site Parking Agreement
Cost + 10%
Minor Exception
$300
Reasonable Accommodation
No fee
Site Inspection
$25
Geologic/Geotechnical Review
Cost + 10%
Traffic Review
Cost + 10%
Zoning Verification Letter
Residential
$60
Nonresidential
$225
Page 3 of 4
Appeals:
Accessory Dwelling Unit -Covenant $100
Banner Permit* W $0
Outdoor Sales (Nonresidential) $70
Private Bus Application Review $25
Temporary Use Permit $225
Yard Sale Permit First yard sale of
(Two yard sales are allowed per residence every each 12 -month
six months. There is no charge for the first yard period is free
sale of each 12 -month period.)
$5 each additional
yard sale
Filing Fees (Planning Commission) $650
Filing Fees (City Council) $750
Development Impact Fees:
Single Use Zones
Residential
Single Family $6,500(per dwelling
unit)
Multi -family $5,197(per dwelling
unit)
Nonresidential
Retail
$1,365 (1,000 sq ft)
Office
$1,997 (1,000 sq ft)
Industrial
$1,250 (1,000 sq ft)
Mixed Use Zones
Residential
Single Family $6,388(per dwelling
unit)
Multi -family $5,126(per dwelling
unit)
Nonresidential
Retail
$1,242 (1,000 sq ft)
Office
$1,812 (1,000 sq ft)
Industrial
$1,127 (1,000 sq ft)
"Banner permit fee waived
Page 4of4
EXHIBIT B
NEW CIP AND FUNDING INCREASE
REQUEST FOR FY 20-2
New CIP Projects and Funding Increase Requests
FY 20/21
Project #
Project
Total
Increase Funding Source
Budget Request
Project
FY 20/21
Cost
1.
21031
Valley Boulevard Resurfacing Project
$ 2,917,300
Gas Tax
$ 247,000
(Continued)
CalRecycle Grant
83,500
2.
21028
Walnut Grove Ave Resurfacing & Colored
1,629,200
RMRA SBI
332,000
Concrete Crosswalk Project (Continued)
CalRecycle Grant
37,500
3.
21030
Walnut Grove Ave Resurfacing Phase II
688,500
Measure M
234,000
(Continued)
CalRecycle Grant
14,500
4.
21029
SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure — Delta Ave
1,141,359
Grant
1,100,000
(Continued)
5.
31019
Replace HVAC System at Garvey Park
353,441
CDBG
128,000
(Continued)
6.
49007
Rosemead Park Walking Trail
345,000
Measure R
80,600
(Continued)
7.
TBD
Storm Water Catch Basin Upgrade (New)
200,000
Safe Clean Water (SCW)
200,000
TOTAL
$ 7,274,800
$ 2,457,100
EXHIBIT C
CIP MATRIX
a
5W
G
/W♦
V/�
♦
0
w
LL
0
3
m
4)
0
U)
A -A
V
.O
L
CL
4)
4)
O
L
C.
E
CL
.^
cc
0
W
m
F
Fes-
F
F
H
U
W
o
pmj
o
c
o
o
0
m
O
IL
w
O
m
w
iF
e«rt
N
w
F-
LU
0
0
� Z
CL
O
O
O
O
O
of
ul
m
ti
o
m
m
rn
rn
J
oil
LL
�
N
h
a
0
a
0
a
0
a
0
a
0
�Q
j L
m
C7
U,
z
0
o
U
Ci
E 0
CD a
. , 4
0
z
CD
m ¢
vi
o1 2 m'
m
CL
a s c
2
d
m
rn= E m a�Ei o a m
o - m a
"_
C d
N n
C N N
d N N N
Z
U
w
U)
2 m E m Q coi 3 coi
Y 2 Vi 3"F-
2
0
0 5
d N a rn vi
o
m y E
cg c
m o m s m m
0 CL
CL
o.
E
2
o
n
a� m
ss
o.
m
H S E Q m 0 N a
°i L ani m
E o rn a n
O C7
y c4
N E
m
t0
d
U
Q
CL
F-
LU
W
2
t
m
Hw
LU
CL
d
N
a
a
m
¢
3
o
m
E
Y
o
2
CD
Q
U
a
a
_
LD
m
o
LR
O
O
0
0
0
�
Q
LU
m
LU
U)
0
w
LL
0
�
�
�
2
�
g
»
O
@
v
@
'O
CL
�
$
E
@
O
�
E
�
CL
w
C-)
\
t
/
:
:
3
)
§
§
2
2
§
m
A
32
j
\
co
»
\
-
_
all -
7
2 -8
/E
/
mo
)
/
a3£
2
-
m a &
-
){)
}
k
)\§R
/§
[f
\/D
/§
ƒ\
#e&%
z
ƒ
)
k
\
�
_
]
F
0
\ \
�
.�
m
>
O
� U)
@
LLJ
L
�
E
k \
LL r.L\
0 E o
V3
k
§tg,
££«�
(\)
;4a
r#@
aaae_-§2e_
w
rae_m{e_
§
)/+)/`/A\)
%\f/
))/J))\J
#
2g==�
oz- -
g
- -_ -
-
-Ci ---\-
-
§
\
WT
_
L)
)
\
\
\
\
k
\
]
LL
A
q
§
§
g
A
§
)
)
)
)
)
77/
\7
§
[t
)§2
k
mm
\\
��
\�
®«
�-
CL
\§2
\
a- /)\
_
8
)
-
)\
\/
]k
k
3
A
[
§$
k
m
t
2LLI
co
C3
»)/
]t«
G#«
k
kR
3
7\f
--$
y7@
2f§
<m
_
)
LU-
/
k
_
/
-
ƒ
§_
Ctf
_
r
-
co
{
)
>
wo
§
m
_'.
242
Li
2 U
.9 U
�
U'
U'
1-
l'oL o
c
� cL o
o
c
c
O
m
NIli UOF
Co W OF-
H
W
m
H
W
o 0 0 C o
g S o 0
C
o
w
iss +n
o
g
o
Z UQQ
Ua
Zm
m
o
a Z
W Z O
v
m
Z
Z O
O p Q
Q p Q
Ess
r»
En
O
tD
�
a
Q
U)
°b
m w
LL }
N
NIL
O
n
E
$
Z
� �
� � `w �o� �
p�
d
6
W
J
S U
rX
U)
m
Z
t
w w Ua
W o 2Ci0
O
w�
m E°-
y
U'
w
w
O
y
O
o
�
U
L
H
Ul
�
�
m
O
T
Z
O
p
C
Z
o
Q
O
w
¢ E
N
Q>
l a
Q
E
E
?
W
>
2
m
LLn
L U
in
m`
T
d
O
¢
C
o
d
m
c r
E
E
Z
Z
D
i
K
C7
a
5
3
C
O
tO
a
E H
T
Z
m
o
_
Z
Z
N
CL
m
g
H
U
n
U
U
y
m
N
w
O m
LU
Q
°�
3axi
c E
D
x
C
N
z c
C
a
Q
Q O
a d
N
E
> t2
1O
o �m
m
O a
¢ A
c
a
�
n
L
d a
n
d
�
d
m
a
d
Z
L
2
L
IL
N
LU
M
LL
d
C
C
Q
L
F
N
H
W
O
E
m
II
CD
Z
>
i
O
WE
_a
p
OC
W
O
o
a
d
y
Q
W
�c
N
Q
O
f
£
T
U
O
y
>
m
3
m
>
o
U
W
in
=
7
C7
v
cc
C.L7
o
7
m c
Fy
-
A
N
_
m Q
EU
Iy-
ani S.
-Wj
UJ
moi- N
Q'
LU
of: C7
Id
Li
W
L=
N
M
d'
Ll
W
d
o0
d
m
of
7
q
�
Q
LLI
m
LLI
Cl)
0
w
LL
0
�
\
�
\
Q
:
/
&
■
j
\
\
e
2
)
k \ �
\
k
()§CCL
§§2
-
-
)J�
\
}
}
»
§k
F-
§
n§ e
k)
\\
8
\ \
§
\
\C2
e
)
``�
f
} & §/
U)
=
\ \q
-
G :
/
)
§
/
(
2
(
k
§
#
—
}
\1
3
e
§
)
\/
I
r
e
§
\
&
/
2)
■
0
\�
\
k4n
k)
)
)\
))
7
{
E
2 a
k
k
«
§
)
)
\ /
}
2
E
)
%ik,
)fk\
)
kk/
/)\{
gm
\
(]
\
\�ILCL
)�/*
U, 0
f)±}
)LN
m0
§
O I
S I
G
EXHIBIT D
UNFUNDED PROJECTS FY 20-2
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
Funding is not available to complete the following
projects.
Projects
Potential Funding Source
Estimated Cost
$55,000
1. New Roof at Canopy (Garvey Park)
General Fund
2. Acoustic Panels (Garvey Gym)
General Fund
$30,000
3. Ball Field Lighting Update
General Fund
$100,000
4. New Gazebo & Landscaping (RCRC)
General Fund
$286,000
5. Playground Equipment Replacement (Garvey & Rosemead
Parks)
General Fund
$200,000
6. Parking Lot Renovations (Sports Complex)
General Fund
$50,000
7. Repainting & Upgrade of City Council Chamber
General Fund
$50,000
8. Roof Repairs at Garvey Park Main Office & Gym
General Fund
$400,000
9. Resurfacing of Garvey Park Tennis Courts
General Fund
$40,000
10. Public Safety Center Upgrades (Construction Phase)
General Fund
$450,000
Total
$1,661,000
11. Utility Undergrounding (Rosemead Blvd)
Rule 20A
TBD
12. Utility Undergrounding (Mission Dr.)
Rule 20A
TBD
13. Rosemead Park Restroom Remodel
Grant
TBD
14. Passive Park
Grant
TBD