Loading...
CC - Item 4G - Adopt Resolution No. 2021-17 Amendment to CIP Budget to Include the City's Four 710 North Mobility Improvement Projects; Approval of Agreements with Metro; Approval of PSA with Transtech for Program and Project Management ServicesI610M61:1BEr ISIPAI ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GLORIA MOLLEDA, CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 27. 2021 SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2021-17, AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET TO INCLUDE THE CITY'S FOUR 710 NORTH MOBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SELECTED BY METRO; APPROVING OF FUNDING AGREEMENTS WITH METRO FOR THE FOUR PROJECTS; AND AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC. FOR PROGRAM & PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES OF THE FOUR PROJECTS SUMMARY Through the recent Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority (L.A. Metro) 710 North Mobility Study, the City's Public Works/Engineering identified and applied for qualifying projects under the program. The City was successful in receiving a total allocation of $27,000,000 for the following four (4) projects: 1. I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) 2. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project [Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead] ($9,000,000) 3. Traffic Signal Improvements [San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley] ($6,000,000) 4. I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) All costs under the program from initial phases through construction and implementation, are fully reimbursable by L.A. Metro. The four (4) projects will need to be included in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for activity status monitoring and cost tracking as well as entering into Funding Agreement with Metro. Additionally, there is a need for program & project management services to assure the projects remain on schedule and within budgets for which the City undertook an RFP Process as further discussed below. On December 3, 2020, the City of Rosemead released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Program and Project Management of the four (4) L.A. Metro awarded mobility improvement grants (Attachment A) and four (4) proposals were received by the deadline of January 14, 2021. The firms that submitted proposals were: AGENDA ITEM 4.G City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 2 of 8 • CAV Consulting • Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. • JMD, Inc. • Transtech Engineers, Inc. The four (4) proposals were submitted to City Clerk's Office as required by the REP. CAV Consulting, Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., JMD, Inc., and Transtech Engineers, Inc. were invited for an interview process by a panel, which included Assistant City Manager, Ben Kim, the Director of Public Works, Chris Daste and peer Director of Public Works William Wittkopf from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The interview process gave the panel an opportunity to meet each firm's team of experts and assess which firm's strengths best matched the needs of the City of Rosemead. Ultimately, the panel recommended Transtech as the firm to provide program & project management for the four (4) 710 North Mobility Improvement Projects based on their proposal and interview. Amongst other factors considered through the competitive process, Transtech's familiarity with the projects, their assistance in securingthe $27,000,000 in 2019, their understanding of scope and recommendation of priorities in the four projects, their demonstration of their experience and understanding of the requirements, policies and procedures with METRO, Caltrans and Los Angeles County, which will be involved in the review, approval and processing of these projects at various levels, their understanding of the regional issues in the San Gabriel Valley as they are also assisting several local cities that are also recipients of L.A. Metro's funding under 710 North Mobility Program, and readiness to include relinquishment of Rosemead Boulevard (State Highway 19) from Caltrans if approved by the City Council, set them apart from other proposers. In May 2017, the L.A. Metro Board of Directors introduced Motion 29. 1, which adopted the Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and directed staff to identify additional mobility improvements beyond the TSM/TDM projects listed in the SR -710 environmental document that could improve traffic flow along the SR -710 corridor between I-10 and I-210 as well as mobility improvements projects. Upon adoption of the TSM/TDM as the LPA, L.A. Metro and local agencies identified projects that, upon implementation, would improve mobility in the SR -710 corridor. During 2018 and 2019, Rosemead Public Works/Engineering identified and applied for qualifying projects under this program. Through this effort, the City received an allocation of $27,000,000 for four (4) projects. The four projects, their allocated budget, project type, and fiscal year cash flow program for funding are as follows: City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 3 of 8 1. I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) PROJECT TYPE 1: Local Street/Road and Freeway Local Interchange Mobility and Operational Improvement Projects CASH FLOW: FY 2020-2021 Through FY 2024-2025 2. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project [Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead] ($9,000,000) PROJECT TYPE 3: Intelligent Transportation Systems [ITS] Projects CASH FLOW: FY 2020-2021 Through FY 2023-2024 3. Traffic Signal Improvements [San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley] ($6,000,000) PROJECT TYPE 3: Intelligent Transportation Systems [ITS] Projects CASH FLOW: FY 2020-2021 Through FY 2023-2024 4. I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) PROJECT TYPE 1: Local Street/Road and Freeway Local Interchange Mobility and Operational Improvement Projects CASH FLOW: FY 2020-2021 Through FY 2025-2026 Metro Funding Agreements and CIP Budget: With the selection by Metro of the four projects, staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the four (4) funding agreements. L.A. Metro will inform the City the availability of final funds and the timing. The project schedules will be established based on final funding amounts and availability, as well as required process and durations for environmental reports, right-of-way takes, review and approvals by the City as well as jurisdictional and regulatory agencies. Following are highlights of the agreement between L.A. Metro and the City: • This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter's expenditures. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) will withhold 5% of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. • GRANTEE must use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner. If GRANTEE intends to use a consultant or contractor to implement all or part of the Project, LACMTA requires that such activities be procured in accordance with GRANTEE's contracting procedures and consistent with State law as appropriate. GRANTEE will also use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner when the Funds are used to pay "in-house" staff time. This effective use of funds provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 4 of 8 • The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre -approved by LACMTA shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA. • GRANTEE shall submit the draft of Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports within 60 days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November, February, May and August to the LACMTA Project Manager for review and pre -approval of the applicable report. • The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports shall include all appropriate documentation (such as contractor invoices, timesheets, receipts, etc.), and any changes to interim milestone dates that do not impact the final milestone date. All supporting documents must include a clear justification and explanation of their relevance to the Project. • If a request for reimbursement exceeds $500,000 in a single month, then GRANTEE can submit such an invoice once per month with supporting documentation. • LACMTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct audits of the Project as deemed appropriate, such as financial and compliance audits, interim audits, pre -award audits, performance audits and final audits. LACMTA will commence a final audit within six months of receipt of acceptable final invoice, provided the Project is ready for final audit. All costs under the program from initial phases through construction and implementation, are fully reimbursable by L.A. Metro. To reflect these new projects, the City's CIP Budget will also need to be amended to include the four (4) projects for activity status monitoring and cost tracking. Request for Proposals for Program and Project Management: The implementation process for each of the four projects requires several complex and lengthy phaes. These phases include project development, fund management, design and preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), bidding, coordination award of construction contract, construction, construction management and inspection during construction, quality assurance/quality control, project accounting and project close out. Each phase requires complex and detail program & project management effort to assure project stays on schedule and within the budgets. Program & project management services are needed and will include all coordination required from initial project development phases through the end of construction. More specifically, program & project management services include the following anticipated tasks: • Coordinate all projects and activities with involved agencies and stake holders, including the City of Rosemead, adjacent local agencies that may be impacted by the proposed improvements or may have received funding from L.A. Metro in the adjacent areas, L.A. Metro, County, Caltrans, and any other agencies and organizations that have jurisdictional control, regulatory agencies, and stake holders as necessary. City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 5 of 8 • Prepare necessary request for proposals, agreements, assist in selection of various consultants. Services that will be provided by various consultants may include project design, environmental services, right-of-way acquisition and engineering services, geotechnical engineering services, traffic engineering services, surveying, and various other services to be determined as part of the project development, as necessary. • Coordination to provide all tasks and services required to manage the project and program in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Providing overall project and program management of the projects from initial project development through the end of construction and project closeout. The services will be provided on as -needed basis. It is anticipated that the workload for the requested services will depend on various factors and the staffing needs and work effort will vary. The RFP for Program & Project Management of the four (4) projects was released on December 3, 2020, with a posting on the City's website and distribution to prospective firms. Proposals were due on January 14, 2021, and the City Clerk received four (4) responsive proposals. No proposal was submitted after the deadline. All four (4) firms (CAV Consulting, Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., JMD, Inc., and Transtech Engineers, Inc.) were advanced to the interview process on February 4, 2021, with a panel which included: Assistant City Manager Ben Kim, Director of Public Works Chris Daste' and William Wittkopf the Director of Public Works from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Each firm introduced their team, made a formal presentation, and answered questions related to their qualifications and role as it pertains specifically to the City of Rosemead and each firm's ability to fulfill the Scope of services as outlined in the RFP. The following is a list of the four (4) firms interviewed and each firm's proposed staff: CAV Consulting, Riverside Ca. Chris A. Vogt, President/Owner. Project Manager Viren Shah, PE, Project Manager Darin Johnson, PE Josh Cosper PE, PLS, QSD Interwest Consulting Group, Inc, Ontario Ca. Terry Rodrigue, PE, TE President and CEO Manuel Gomez, Senior Project Manager Steven L. Wright, PE TE Deputy Project Manager JMD, Citv of Industry Juan M. Diaz, MBA, PE President/CEO Algis J. Marciuska, MBA, PE Project Manager Peter Kim, PE, TE, PTOE Advisory Team Steven Itagaki, PE, PTOE City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 6 of 8 Ivan Salvatierra, PE, TE Lan Saadatnejadi, MBA, PE Transtech En$lneers, Inc, Chino Ca. Ahmad Ansari, PE, Contract Principal Ali F. Zaghari, PE, PMP Bahman Janka, PE, Traffic Engineer Mike Benyamin, PE David Ragland, PE, PLS, QSD, Michael Ackerman, PE, QSD, QSP, QISP, Okan Demirci, PE, QSD, QSP, MBA Although all four (4) firms were qualified to provide the requested services to the City of Rosemead, Transtech stood out as the most qualified and best match for the City of Rosemead. Transtech demonstrated that they have a better understanding of the project issues, challenges, as well as the requirements of the program and funding. Transtech team includes staff members with extensive experience in working with L.A. Metro, Caltrans and Los Angeles County, the agencies that will be involved in the review, permitting, and approval of these projects. Transtech also demonstrated a clear understanding of the unique challenges the City of Rosemead currently faces regarding it's aggressive CIP program. Transtech is familiar with the standards and procedures, project development and approval process, staff and funding requirements of these agencies. Transtech also provided a presentation to the panel for City's review for the possibilities of potential relinquishment of Rosemead Boulevard, which is currently under Caltrans Jurisdiction. Municipalities can seek relinquishment of all or portions of state highways running through their jurisdictions to gain local control over the land uses on or adjacent to these roadways and to reduce the cost and delay associated with gaining Caltrans' approval, and being subject to its decisions, whenever changes are sought. Transtech team has a clear understanding of the regional issues in the San Gabriel Valley as they are also assisting several local cities that are recipients of L.A. Metro's funding under the 710 North Mobility Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-17 amending the City's 2020-2021 CIP Budget to include the four (4) 710 North Mobility Improvement Projects to be funded according to project priority, through multiple fiscal years, and according to L.A. Metro programmed funds; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the four (4) funding agreements with L.A. Metro for the 710 North Mobility Improvement Projects for a total of $27,000,000 in grant funding and take any steps required to finalize such agreement with Metro including any non -substantive edits that may be required in consultation with the City Attorney; and 3. Award a Professional Services Agreement with Transtech Engineers, Inc. to provide Program & Project Management Services of the four (4) 710 North Mobility Improvement City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 7 of 8 Projects at allot -To Exceed budget of $1,500,000 to allow the projects to be completed on the timeline provided by Metro for the use of the Funds. FINANCIAL IMPACT The City of Rosemead's total approved budget for the four (4) projects under L.A. Metro's North 710 Mobility Improvement Program is $27,000,000. This budget will cover all phases of project development through implementation. The budget cash flow for each fiscal year per project is shown in Attachment J. All costs under the program from initial phases through construction and implementation, are fully reimbursable by L.A. Metro, as depicted on Attachment Jto this staff report. The four (4) projects will need to be included in the City's CIP Budget for activity status monitoring and cost tracking. Per the Funding Agreements with L.A. Metro, the total allocated budget for soft costs is $7,540,000. The project, program, and funding management to be provided under the professional service contract is a portion of the soft costs that will be reimbursed by L.A. Metro. The estimated budget of $1,500,000 represents approximately 6% of the total approved project budgets of $27,000,000. The estimated budget for the services to be provided will cover the duration from initial project development through the end of construction and project closeout, and is well within industry ranges for these types of services. Costs estimated for project, program and project management services to be provided under this contract will be on as needed and time and material basis of actual hours utilized for each project. The Not -To -Exceed total requested budget for the program and project management services to be provided under this contract for all four (4) projects and for the full implementation duration (estimated to be five to seven years) is $1,500,000. STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT The project is consistent with the Strategic Plan's guiding principal for fiduciary responsibility of providing for transparency in financial management of City's finances and providing quality of life enhancement. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Submitted by: Gloria Molleda City Manager City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 8 of 8 Attachment A: Request for Proposal Attachment B: Fee Schedule Attachment C: Draft Professional Service Agreement Attachment D: Proposals - Four (4) firms Attachment E: I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Ramp Improvements Funding Agreement Attachment F: I-10/Walnut Grove Freeway Ramp Improvements Funding Agreement Attachment G: Adaptive Traffic & Traffic Responsive Control Project Funding Agreement Attachment H: Traffic Signal Improvements Funding Agreement Attachment L Key Provisions from L.A. Metro's Grant Agreement Attachment J: Fiscal Year Cash Flow Program Chart Attachment K: Resolution No. 2021-17 Attachment K Resolution No. 2021-17 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE FY 2020-21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET TO INCLUDE THE CITY'S FOUR (4) 710 NORTH MOBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE FOUR (4) 710 NORTH MOBILITY PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AND THE LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) adopted Ordinance #08-01, the Traffic Relief and Rail Expansion Ordinance, on July 24, 2008 (the "Ordinance"), which Ordinance was approved by the voters of Los Angeles County on November 4, 2008 as "Measure R" and became effective on January 2, 2009; and WHEREAS, $780,000,000 in Measure R funds was identified in Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan for the SR -710 North Gap Closure [tunnel] Project [SR -710 North]; and WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board at its May 25, 2017 meeting, reallocated the remaining Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion, if consistent with the purpose and need ofthe Gap Closure Projectto relieve congestion on local streets alongthe SR -710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway; and WHEREAS, the City has applied for and received funding approval in the amount of $27,000,000 from LACMTA to implement four (4) new mobility improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the four (4) Funding Agreements (FA) with LACMTA must be executed before invoices can be reimbursed: 1) FA #9200000000MR41208 (I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements; and 2) FA #9200000000MR41209 (I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements; and 3) FA #9200000000MR43219 (Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project—Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead); and 4) FA #9200000000MR43220 (Traffic Signal Improvements — San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley); NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the four (4) Funding Agreements for the 710 North Mobility Improvement projects awarded to the City by LACMTA and amends the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Capital Improvement Program budget to include the City's four projects: 1. I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements inthe amount of $6,000,000; and 2. I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements in the amount of $6,000,000; and 3. Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project—Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead in the amount of $9,000,000; and 4. Traffic Signal Improvements— San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley in the amount of $6,000,000 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and hereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27a' day of April, 2021. Polly Low, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: Rachel Richman, City Attorney Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) CITY OF ROSEMEAD ) I, Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution, No. 2021-17, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27a' day of April, 2021, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GLORIA MOLLEDA, CITY MANAGER A.�4 . DATE: APRIL 27, 2021 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET TO INCLUDE THE CITY'S FOUR 710 NORTH MOBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SELECTED BY METRO; APPROVAL OF FUNDING AGREEMENTS WITH METRO FOR THE FOUR PROJECTS; AND AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC. FOR PROGRAM & PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES OF THE FOUR PROJECTS SUMMARY Through the recent Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority (L.A. Metro) 710 North Mobility Study, the City's Public Works/Engineering identified and applied for qualifying projects under the program. The City was successful in receiving a total allocation of $27,000,000 for the following four (4) projects: 1. I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) 2. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project [Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead] ($9,000,000) 3. Traffic Signal Improvements [San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley] ($6,000,000) 4. I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) All costs under the program from initial phases through construction and implementation, are fully reimbursable by L.A. Metro. The four (4) projects will need to be included in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for activity status monitoring and cost tracking as well as entering into Funding Agreement with Metro. Additionally, there is a need for program & project management services to assure the projects remain on schedule and within budgets for which the City undertook an RFP Process as further discussed below. On December 3, 2020, the City of Rosemead released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Program and Project Management of the four (4) L.A. Metro awarded mobility improvement grants (Attachment A) and four (4) proposals were received by the deadline of January 14, 2021. The firms that submitted proposals were: AGENDA ITEM 4.G City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 2 of 8 • CAV Consulting • Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. • JMD, Inc. • Transtech Engineers, Inc. The four (4) proposals were submitted to City Clerk's Office as required by the RFP. CAV Consulting, Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., JMD, Inc., and Transtech Engineers, Inc. were invited for an interview process by a panel, which included Assistant City Manager, Ben Kim, the Director of Public Works, Chris Daste and peer Director of Public Works William Wittkopf from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The interview process gave the panel an opportunity to meet each firm's team of experts and assess which firm's strengths best matched the needs of the City of Rosemead. Ultimately, the panel recommended Transtech as the firm to provide program & project management for the four (4) 710 North Mobility Improvement Projects based on their proposal and interview. Amongst other factors considered through the competitive process, Transtech's familiarity with the projects, their assistance in securing the $27,000,000 in 2019, their understanding of scope and recommendation of priorities in the four projects, their demonstration of their experience and understanding of the requirements, policies and procedures with METRO, Caltrans and Los Angeles County, which will be involved in the review, approval and processing of these projects at various levels, their understanding of the regional issues in the San Gabriel Valley as they are also assisting several local cities that are also recipients of L.A. Metro's funding under 710 North Mobility Program, and readiness to include relinquishment of Rosemead Boulevard (State Highway 19) from Caltrans if approved by the City Council, set them apart from other proposers. DISCUSSION In May 2017, the L.A. Metro Board of Directors introduced Motion 29.1, which adopted the Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and directed staff to identify additional mobility improvements beyond the TSM/TDM projects listed in the SR -710 environmental document that could improve traffic flow along the SR -710 corridor between I-10 and I-210 as well as mobility improvements projects. Upon adoption of the TSM/TDM as the LPA, L.A. Metro and local agencies identified projects that, upon implementation, would improve mobility in the SR -710 corridor. During 2018 and 2019, Rosemead Public Works/Engineering identified and applied for qualifying projects under this program. Through this effort, the City received an allocation of $27,000,000 for four (4) projects. The four projects, their allocated budget, project type, and fiscal year cash flow program for funding are as follows: City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 3 of 8 1. I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) PROJECT TYPE 1: Local Street/Road and Freeway Local Interchange Mobility and Operational Improvement Projects CASH FLOW: FY 2020-2021 Through FY 2024-2025 2. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project [Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead] ($9,000,000) PROJECT TYPE 3: Intelligent Transportation Systems [ITS] Projects CASH FLOW: FY 2020-2021 Through FY 2023-2024 3. Traffic Signal Improvements [San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley] ($6,000,000) PROJECT TYPE 3: Intelligent Transportation Systems [ITS] Projects CASH FLOW: FY 2020-2021 Through FY 2023-2024 4. I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) PROJECT TYPE 1: Local Street/Road and Freeway Local Interchange Mobility and Operational Improvement Projects CASH FLOW: FY 2020-2021 Through FY 2025-2026 Metro Funding Agreements and CIP Budget: With the selection by Metro of the four projects, staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the four (4) funding agreements. L.A. Metro will inform the City the availability of final funds and the timing. The project schedules will be established based on final funding amounts and availability, as well as required process and durations for environmental reports, right-of-way takes, review and approvals by the City as well as jurisdictional and regulatory agencies. Following are highlights of the agreement between L.A. Metro and the City: • This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter's expenditures. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) will withhold 5% of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. • GRANTEE must use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner. If GRANTEE intends to use a consultant or contractor to implement all or part of the Project, LACMTA requires that such activities be procured in accordance with GRANTEE's contracting procedures and consistent with State law as appropriate. GRANTEE will also use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner when the Funds are used to pay "in-house" staff time. This effective use of funds provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 4 of 8 • The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre -approved by LACMTA shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA. • GRANTEE shall submit the draft of Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports within 60 days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November, February, May and August to the LACMTA Project Manager for review and pre -approval of the applicable report. • The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports shall include all appropriate documentation (such as contractor invoices, timesheets, receipts, etc.), and any changes to interim milestone dates that do not impact the final milestone date. All supporting documents must include a clear justification and explanation of their relevance to the Project. • If a request for reimbursement exceeds $500,000 in a single month, then GRANTEE can submit such an invoice once per month with supporting documentation. • LACMTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct audits of the Project as deemed appropriate, such as financial and compliance audits, interim audits, pre -award audits, performance audits and final audits. LACMTA will commence a final audit within six months of receipt of acceptable final invoice, provided the Project is ready for final audit. All costs under the program from initial phases through construction and implementation, are fully reimbursable by L.A. Metro. To reflect these new projects, the City's CIP Budget will also need to be amended to include the four (4) projects for activity status monitoring and cost tracking. Request for Proposals for Program and Project Management: The implementation process for each of the four projects requires several complex and lengthy phaes. These phases include project development, fund management, design and preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), bidding, coordination award of construction contract, construction, construction management and inspection during construction, quality assurance/quality control, project accounting and project close out. Each phase requires complex and detail program & project management effort to assure project stays on schedule and within the budgets. Program & project management services are needed and will include all coordination required from initial project development phases through the end of construction. More specifically, program & project management services include the following anticipated tasks: Coordinate all projects and activities with involved agencies and stake holders, including the City of Rosemead, adjacent local agencies that may be impacted by the proposed improvements or may have received funding from L.A. Metro in the adjacent areas, L.A. Metro, County, Caltrans, and any other agencies and organizations that have jurisdictional control, regulatory agencies, and stake holders as necessary. City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 5 of 8 Prepare necessary request for proposals, agreements, assist in selection of various consultants. Services that will be provided by various consultants may include project design, environmental services, right-of-way acquisition and engineering services, geotechnical engineering services, traffic engineering services, surveying, and various other services to be determined as part of the project development, as necessary. • Coordination to provide all tasks and services required to manage the project and program in an efficient and cost-effective manner. • Providing overall project and program management of the projects from initial project development through the end of construction and project closeout. The services will be provided on as -needed basis. It is anticipated that the workload for the requested services will depend on various factors and the staffing needs and work effort will vary. The RFP for Program & Project Management of the four (4) projects was released on December 3, 2020, with a posting on the City's website and distribution to prospective firms. Proposals were due on January 14, 2021, and the City Clerk received four (4) responsive proposals. No proposal was submitted after the deadline. All four (4) firms (CAV Consulting, Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., JMD, Inc., and Transtech Engineers, Inc.) were advanced to the interview process on February 4, 2021, with a panel which included: Assistant City Manager Ben Kim, Director of Public Works Chris Daste' and William Wittkopf the Director of Public Works from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Each firm introduced their team, made a formal presentation, and answered questions related to their qualifications and role as it pertains specifically to the City of Rosemead and each firm's ability to fulfill the Scope of services as outlined in the RFP. The following is a list of the four (4) firms interviewed and each firm's proposed staff: CAV Consulting, Riverside Ca. Chris A. Vogt, President/Owner. Project Manager Viren Shah, PE, Project Manager Darin Johnson, PE Josh Cosper PE, PLS, QSD Interwest Consultine Group, Inc, Ontario Ca. Terry Rodrigue, PE, TE President and CEO Manuel Gomez, Senior Project Manager Steven L. Wright, PE TE Deputy Project Manager JMD, City of Industry Juan M. Diaz, MBA, PE President/CEO Algis J. Marciuska, MBA, PE Project Manager Peter Kim, PE, TE, PTOE Advisory Team Steven Itagaki, PE, PTOE City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 6 of 8 Ivan Salvatierra, PE, TE Lan Saadatnejadi, MBA, PE Transtech Engineers, Inc, Chino Ca. Ahmad Ansari, PE, Contract Principal Ali F. Zaghari, PE, PMP Bahman Janka, PE, Traffic Engineer Mike Benyamin, PE David Ragland, PE, PLS, QSD, Michael Ackerman, PE, QSD, QSP, QISP, Okan Demirci, PE, QSD, QSP, MBA Although all four (4) firms were qualified to provide the requested services to the City of Rosemead, Transtech stood out as the most qualified and best match for the City of Rosemead. Transtech demonstrated that they have a better understanding of the project issues, challenges, as well as the requirements of the program and funding. Transtech team includes staff members with extensive experience in working with L.A. Metro, Caltrans and Los Angeles County, the agencies that will be involved in the review, permitting, and approval of these projects. Transtech also demonstrated a clear understanding of the unique challenges the City of Rosemead currently faces regarding it's aggressive CIP program. Transtech is familiar with the standards and procedures, project development and approval process, staff and funding requirements of these agencies. Transtech also provided a presentation to the panel for City's review for the possibilities of potential relinquishment of Rosemead Boulevard, which is currently under Caltrans Jurisdiction. Municipalities can seek relinquishment of all or portions of state highways running through their jurisdictions to gain local control over the land uses on or adjacent to these roadways and to reduce the cost and delay associated with gaining Caltrans' approval, and being subject to its decisions, whenever changes are sought. Transtech team has a clear understanding of the regional issues in the San Gabriel Valley as they are also assisting several local cities that are recipients of L.A. Metro's funding under the 710 North Mobility Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the four (4) funding agreements with L.A. Metro for the 710 North Mobility Improvement Projects for a total of $27,000,000 in grant funding and take any steps required to finalize such agreement with Metro including any non -substantive edits that may be required in consultation with the City Attorney; and 2. Amend the City's 2020-2021 CIP Budget to include the four (4) 710 North Mobility Improvement Projects to be funded according to project priority, through multiple fiscal years, and according to L.A. Metro programmed funds; and 3. Award a Professional Services Agreement with Transtech Engineers, Inc. to provide Program & Project Management Services of the four (4) 710 North Mobility Improvement Projects at a Not -To Exceed budget of $1,500,000 to allow the projects to be completed on the timeline provided by Metro for the use of the Funds. City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 7 of 8 FINANCIAL IMPACT The City of Rosemead's total approved budget for the four (4) projects under L.A. Metro's North 710 Mobility Improvement Program is $27,000,000. This budget will cover all phases of project development through implementation. The budget cash flow for each fiscal year per project is shown in Attachment J. All costs under the program from initial phases through construction and implementation, are fully reimbursable by L.A. Metro, as depicted on Attachment J to this staff report. The four (4) projects will need to be included in the City's CIP Budget for activity status monitoring and cost tracking. Per the Funding Agreements with L.A. Metro, the total allocated budget for soft costs is $7,540,000. The project, program, and funding management to be provided under the professional service contract is a portion of the soft costs that will be reimbursed by L.A. Metro. The estimated budget of $1,500,000 represents approximately 6% of the total approved project budgets of $27,000,000. The estimated budget for the services to be provided will cover the duration from initial project development through the end of construction and project closeout, and is well within industry ranges for these types of services. Costs estimated for project, program and project management services to be provided under this contract will be on as needed and time and material basis of actual hours utilized for each project. The Not -To -Exceed total requested budget for the program and project management services to be provided under this contract for all four (4) projects and for the full implementation duration (estimated to be five to seven years) is $1,500,000. STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT The project is consistent with the Strategic Plan's guiding principal for fiduciary responsibility of providing for transparency in financial management of City's finances and providing quality of life enhancement. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Submitted by: JorniaLM'oL11e9da City Manager City Council Meeting April 27, 2021 Page 8 of 8 Attachment A: Request for Proposal Attachment B: Fee Schedule Attachment C: Draft Professional Service Agreement Attachment D: Proposals - Four (4) firms Attachment E: I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Ramp Improvements Funding Agreement Attachment F: I-10/Walnut Grove Freeway Ramp Improvements Funding Agreement Attachment G: Adaptive Traffic & Traffic Responsive Control Project Funding Agreement Attachment H: Traffic Signal Improvements Funding Agreement Attachment I: Key Provisions from L.A. Metro's Grant Agreement Attachment J: Fiscal Year Cash Flow Program Chart Attachment A Request for Proposal REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 2020-11 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO SR -710 NORTH CORRIDOR MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS SUBMITTALS: Five (5) bound copies and one (1) electronic PDF file on flash drive or CD of the proposal in sealed envelope(s) must be received by the City of Rosemead's City Clerk's Office by no later than Thursday, January 14, 2021, 2:00 p.m. TECHNICAL CONTACT PERSON: Chris Daste, Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 (626) 569-2158 cdaste@cityofrosemead.org PROPOSALS RECEIVED AFTER THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVE SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED. FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL PROPOSAL WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Please direct any questions or concerns regarding this RFP to Chris Daste, Director of Public Works via email: cdaste@cityofrosemead.org no later than two (2) weeks prior to the RFP due date. Answers to submitted questions will be posted on the City's website. This RFP is posted on the City's website at: www.cityofrosemead.org. Please review the requirements of the RFP and submit your proposal by the date specified. Issued by: Chris Daste, Director of Public Works City of Rosemead Date: December 3, 2020 City of Rosemead - SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 CITY OF ROSEMEAD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 2020-11 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO SR -710 NORTH CORRIDOR MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS A. INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE Through this Request for Proposal ("RFP") and evaluation process, the City of Rosemead is seeking qualified consultant(s) interested in providing PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO SR -710 NORTH CORRIDOR MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS in accordance with the specifications and information provided herein. B. BACKGROUND ABOUT THE CITY The City of Rosemead is an urban suburb located in the San Gabriel Valley, 10 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. It is bounded on the north by the cities of Temple City and San Gabriel, on the west by Monterey Park, Alhambra, and the unincorporated Los Angeles County community of South San Gabriel, on the south by Montebello, and by EI Monte and South EI Monte on the east. The City is 5.5 square miles (2,344 -acres) in size. Rosemead is a working-class suburb with a diverse population base. According to the 2010 Census, the City had a population of 53,764. The estimated makeup of the City was 4.7% White, 0.3% African American, 60.3% Asian, 33% Hispanic/Latino (of any race), and 0.7% Non -Hispanic Other. As a substantially built -out city, Rosemead only added 259 residents to its population during the last decade (2000-2010). Rosemead's appeal as a new kind of small town in the heart of an urban environment is accomplished by honoring tradition, uniting in diversity, and evolving for the future. This is evident in Rosemead's Key Organizational Goals which aim to: improve public areas including infrastructure and community facilities; enhance public safety and the overall community environment and opportunities for residents through programs, services, education, and recreation; and ensure the City's financial stability in order to continually meet these goals and provide basic services to the community. Today, the City boasts that its goals include the improvement of quality of life offered in Rosemead in a business -friendly atmosphere conducive to continued economic growth and prosperity. The City offers a desirable and affordable community in which to live and a dynamic and expanding business sector that is an economic growth engine for West Coast commerce. 2 City of Rosemead - SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 C. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND SERVICES METRO Action: At its May 2017 meeting, the Metro Board of Directors introduced Motion 29.1, which adopted the TSM/TDM as the Locally -Preferred Alternative and directed staff to identify additional mobility improvements beyond the TSM/TDM projects listed in the SR -710 environmental document that could improve traffic flow along the SR - 710 corridor between 1-10 and 1-210 as well as mobility improvements projects. Upon adoption of the TSM/TDM as the LPA, Metro and local agencies identified projects that, upon implementation, would improve mobility in the SR -710 corridor. City of Rosemead received an allocation of $27,000,000 for the following 4 projects: 1. 1-10 / Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) 2. 1-10 / Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) 3. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project [Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead] ($9,000,000) 4. Traffic Signal Improvements [San Gabriel, Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley] ($6,000,000) Request for Proposals: The City issued this Request for Proposals for Project Management Services for 710 Mobility Improvement Projects. The following is an outline of scope services anticipated to be provided by the selected consultant: Provide overall project and program management of the projects from initial project development thru the end of construction and project closeout. Coordinate all projects and activities with involved agencies and stakeholders, including the City of Rosemead, adjacent local agencies that may be impacted by the proposed improvements or may have received funding from METRO in the adjacent areas, METRO, County, Caltrans, and any other agencies and organizations that have jurisdictional control, regulatory agencies, and stakeholders as necessary. Prepare necessary request for proposals, notice inviting bids, agreements, and assist in the selection -of various consultants. Services that will be provided by various consultants may include project design, environmental services, right-of-way acquisition, engineering services, geotechnical engineering 3 City of Rosemead — SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 services, traffic engineering services, surveying, and various other services to be determined as part of the project development as necessary. The services requested are for the overall project, and program management from initial project development thru the end of construction and project close out. The consultants shall provide their detailed approach and scope of services to provide the required services and to manage the project and program in an efficient and cost- effective manner. It is the consultant's responsibility to identify all necessary tasks and components and provide all necessary services as required. The level of work effort and level of staffing for the requested services will depend on various factors and will vary. The selected consultant will provide the services on as -needed basis. The City is in the process of finalizing funding agreements. METRO will inform the City on the availability of final funds and the timing. The project schedules will be established based on final funding amounts and availability, as well as required process and durations for environmental reports, right-of-way acquisitions, review and approvals by the City, as well as jurisdictional and regulatory agencies. The requested services in this RFP will be provided under direction of the Director of Public Works. D. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION Proposals shall be submitted in two (2) separate envelopes as follows: 1. Technical Proposal, five (5) bound copies and one (1) PDF file on thumb d rive 2. Fee Schedule (showing staff classifications and average hourly rates for various staff members anticipated to work on the project), five (5) bound copies and one (1) PDF file on thumb drive Proposal submitted due date is: Thursday, January 14, 2021, 2:00 p.m. Proposals shall be addressed to: Request for Proposal - Project Management Services Related to SR -710 City of Rosemead -City Hall City Clerk's Office 8838 E. Valley Blvd Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk Late Proposals will not be accepted 4 City of Rosemead — SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 E. CONSULTANT SELECTION SCHEDULE • Selection of Proposer (Tentative Date): February 2021 • Consultant Start (Tentative Date): March 2021 F. CONTRACT DURATION The term of the agreement is anticipated to be 5 years, which includes project development, construction and project closeout. G. STANDARD CITY CONTRACT AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The City's Draft Professional Services Agreement is provided as Attachment A. Please review and provide any comments you have. City does not guarantee that any revisions to the contract will be accepted. H. CONSULTANT SELECTION METHODOLOGY The City will evaluate the Proposals submitted and select the most qualified consultant. In evaluating the Proposals, the City may consider the following factors: • Completeness of the RFP and compliance with the required format. • Project understanding and approach to provide the requested services efficiently. • Experience and qualifications of the project team members. • Experience and qualifications of the firm. • Experience in the local area and project requirements and processes. • Experience in working as an extension of City staff and providing services in similar capacities with minimal direction from City staff. During the evaluation process, the City may also contact listed references (or request additional references), and include the feedback received in the evaluation factors listed above as applicable. I. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL FORMAT Proposal shall be submitted in the format specified below: Cover Letter: Provide an executive summary of your proposal. Table of Contents: Provide contents of proposal with page number references for each proposal section listed below. 5 City of Rosemead — SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 Section 1. Approach and Scope of Work: Provide your understanding of the project, scope of work, and describe your approach in providing services. Section 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes: Provide an organization chart showing the names and responsibilities of key personnel and subconsultants. Provide resumes of all key personnel identified in the organization chart. Section 3. Company Qualifications: Provide qualifications of your organization, emphasize similar services provided, and local experience. Section 4. References: Provide five (5) Public Agency references for similar projects. Section 5. Standard Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements: Proposers shall review the attached Standard Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements and provide a statement that they will comply with all aspects of the Agreement or provide any comments they would like the City to consider. Section 6. Addenda Acknowledgement: If any Addenda is issued by the City, they shall be acknowledged in this section. Fee Proposal In a separate envelope, please submit your firm's current Hourly Fee Ratesshowing staff classifications and average hourly rates for various staff members anticipated to work on the project. The level of effort and staffing to be assigned to this project will vary and fluctuate base on many factors, such as final funding agreements with METRO, when funds will be available, project schedules and phasing, approval process and durations by jurisdictional and regulatory agencies, approval of environmental reports, right-of- way acquisitions, and many other factors. As such, the work on this contract will be on a time and material and as -needed basis. The submitted staff rates will be used for negotiation with the selected consultant for the scope of works, tasks, and payments. The project fee will be billed on a time and material basis, with detailed staff timecards indicating actual time spent with a description of the tasks performed as backup. J. PROTEST PROCEDURES This section sets forth the protest remedies available with respect to the RFP. Each prospective consultant, by submitting its Proposal, expressly recognizes the limitation on its rights to protest contained herein, and expressly waives all other ,y City of Rosemead — SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 rights and remedies. Each prospective consultant agrees that the decision on any protest, as provided herein, will be final and binding on the protestant. All protests and related statements described in this section shall be submitted to: City of Rosemead -City Hall City Clerk's Office 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk K. DEBRIEFING Proposers who submit a proposal in response to the RFP shall be notified in writing when the proposer was not selected to receive further consideration. L. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT Proposals may be subject to public disclosure under the California Public Records Act and other public records laws, and by submitting a proposal, the proposer waives all rights to confidentiality of any information submitted in the proposal and agrees to any and all such disclosures required or permitted by law. Proposals become the property of the City when submitted and by submitting a proposal, the proposer agrees that the City may use any information, documentation or writing contained in the proposal for any City purpose. M. PRE -CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES IS RESPONDING TO THE RFP PREPARATION The City will not be liable for any pre -contractual expenses incurred by any proposer or by any selected consultant. Each proposer shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all liability, claims, or expenses whosever incurred by, or on behalf of, the entity participating in the preparation of its response to this RFP. Pre -contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by proposers and the selected consultant, if any, in: • Preparing and submitting information in response to this RFP • Negotiations with the City on any matter related to this procurement • Costs associated with interviews, meetings, travel or presentations • All other expenses incurred by a proposer/consultant prior to the date of award and a formal notice to proceed. The City reserves the right to amend, withdraw and cancel the RFP. The City reserves the right to reject all responses to this request at any time prior to contract execution, or only award a partial contract. 7 City of Rosemead — SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 N. QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RFP Please direct any questions or concerns regarding this RFP to Chris Daste, Director of Public Works via email: cdastena.citvofrosemead. ora no later than two (2) weeks prior to the RFP due date. Answers to submitted questions will be posted on the City's website. ATTACHMENT A: Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements ATTACHMENT B: Distribution List N City of Rosemead — SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 Attachment A Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements Please See Attached Draft Agreement PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NAME OF PROJECT (CONTRACTOR NAME) 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this this INSERT DATE (Effective Date) by and between the City of Rosemead, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 8838 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead, California 91770 ("City") and CONTRACTOR NAME with its principal place of business at ADDRESS ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing TYPE OF SERVICE to public clients, is licenced in the State of California and is familiar with the plans of City. 2.2 Project. City desires to engage Consultant to render PROJECT SERVICE OR NAME ("Services") as set forth in this Agreement. 3. TERMS. 3.1 Scope of Services and Term. 3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees tc furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the TYPE OF SERVICE services necessary for the City, herein referred to a "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the CONSULTANT Page 2 of 11 exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a INSERT TERM YEAR year time period from Effective date with the option for up to two (2) one-year extensions at the sole and absolute discretion of the City, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of the Agreement, and shall meet any other established shcedules and deadlines. 3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant. 3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City. 3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be CONSULTANT Page 3 of 11 promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. 3.2.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City's Representative or his or her designee. 3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant will designate to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.2.7 Coordination of Services: Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees: Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. 3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged CONSULTANT Page 4 of 11 failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.2.10 Insurance: Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit B attached to and part of this agreement. 3.2.11 Safety: Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.3 Fees and Payments. 3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement and shall not exceed INSERT COST AMOUNT per fiscal year. The City agrees to pay Consultant a fee of INSERT COST AMOUNT WRITTEN ($INSERT NUMBERICAL COST) a month. Extra Work may be authorized in writing, as described below, and will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses: Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City. 3.3.4 Extra Work: At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City's Representative. 3.3.5 Prevailing Wages: Consultant is aware of the requirements of CONSULTANT Page 5 of 11 California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft; classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.4 Accounting Records. 3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection: Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.5 General Provisions. 3.5.1 Termination of Agreement. 3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination: City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination: If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents/ Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.5.1.3 Additional- Services: In the event this Agreement is CONSULTANT Page 6 of 11 terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: NAME ADDRESS Attn: Tel: CITY: City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: City Manager Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality. 3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property: This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, CONSULTANT Page 7 of 11 written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts: The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.5.5 Attorney's Fees: If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of such action. 3.5.6 Indemnification: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its directors, officials officers, employees, agents or volunteers. 3.5.7 Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior CONSULTANT Page 8 of 11 negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.5.8 Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Los Angeles County. 3.5.9 Time of Essence: Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.5.10 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants: City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.5.11 Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties. 3.5.12 Assignment or Transfer: Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.5.13 Construction; References; Captions: Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 3.5.14 Amendment; Modification: No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.5.15 Waiver: No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 3.5.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries: There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.5.17 Invalidity; Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the CONSULTANT Page 9 of 11 remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.5.18 Prohibited Interests: Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City's Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.5.19 Equal Opportunity Employment: Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.5.20 Labor Certification: By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.5.21 Authority to EnterAgreement: Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 3.5.22 Counterparts: This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.6 Subcontracting. CONSULTANT Page 10 of 11 3.6.1 Prior Approval Required: Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. [Signatures on next page] CONSULTANT Page 11 of 11 CITY OF ROSEMEAD CONTRACTOR By: By: City Manager Date Date Attest: City Clerk Date Name: Title: [If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR Vice President AND Secretary, AND CORPORATE SEAL OF CONTRACTOR REQUIRED] Approved as to Form: By: Date City Attorney Name: Title: EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL FOR SERVICES/ RATE SCHEDULE/RESUME Lail EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth here, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to City. Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO "insured contract" language will not be accepted. Automobile liability insurance: Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non -owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than 1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) if used to meet limit requirements, shall provide coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Any such coverage provided under an umbrella liability policy shall include a drop down provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary but covered by the umbrella. Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured's liability is determined, not requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross liability exclusion precluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to City for injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage provided is subject to approval of City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1 Million per occurrence. C-1 Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the consultant and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the state of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of A- or better and a minimum financial size VII. General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010. Consultant also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent. C-2 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at City option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice to City of any cancellation of coverage. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, or that any party will "endeavor" (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Consultant or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self insurance available to City. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 11. Consultant agrees not to self -insure or to use any self-insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self -insure its obligations to City. If Consultant's existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self- insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or selfinsured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 12.The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. IM] 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five days of the expiration of the coverages. 17.The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all- inclusive. 19. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20.The requirements in this Section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not C-4 the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. C-5 City of Rosemead — SR -710 Projects Request for Proposal No. 2020-11 Attachment B Distribution List KOA Corporation Attn: Mr. Stephen Bise 1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201 Monterey Park, CA 91754 Phone: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705 sbise(cDkoacorp.com Infrastructure Engineers Attn: Steve Forster 3060 Saturn Street Brea, CA 92821 Phone: (714) 940-0100 Fax: (714) 940-0700 sfo rste r (c- i n fe ng r. co m Interwest Consulting Group Attn: Michael Kashiwagi 1540 Transistor Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Phone: (714) 899-9039 mkashiwagiCaNnterwestgro. com NV5 Attn: Amy Amirani 9890 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Phone: (949) 585-0477 Amy.amirani(D,nv5.com Onward Engineering Attn: Majdi Ataya 300 S. Harbor Boulevard, Suite 814 Anaheim, CA 92805 Phone: (714) 533-3050 mataya(a-oe-enq.com Quantum Quality Consulting, Inc. Attn: Frank Bigdeli 2720 Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 100 Torrance, CA 90505 Phone: (310) 891-3994 Fax: (310) 891-3995 fbigdelil(a�-theguantumconsultina.com Transtech Engineers, Inc. Attn: Ali Cayir 13367 Benson Avenue Chino, CA 91710 Phone: (909) 595-8599, Ext. 121 ali.cayir(cD-transtech.org *RFP IS OPEN TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES 10 Attachment B Fee Schedule Ti iday's Small 'Tmvn America Jr* lip" Metro FEE PROPOSAL for RFP No, 2020-11 Project Management Services Related To SR -710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects Submitted By —"- TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC. � Contact Person for this Proposal: Ahmad Ansari, PE, Principal E: ahmad.ansari@transtech.org C: 949-702-5612 y 0:909-595-8599,'y Transtech.org Due Date: 01-14-21,2 pm Submittal includes 5 bound copies & 1 electronic PDF Fee Proposal 1 January 14, 2021 City of ROSEMEAD City Clerk's Office 8838 E. Valley Blvd Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk FEE PROPOSAL Corp. HQ: 23367 Benson Ave Chino, CA 92720 www.transtech.org 855.595.2495 (toll-free) TRANsTEch 1 X714 : For RFP No. 2020-11, Project Management Services Related to SR -710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects As required, Fee Proposal is submitted in a separate envelope. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Transtech Engineers, Inc. Ahmad Ansari, PE, Principal E: ahmad.ansari@transtech.ore C: 949-702-5612 O: 909-595-8599 FEB PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11 Project Management Services Related to SR -710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects A 'I TRANswch Fee Proposal As indicated in the RFP, the level of effort and staffing to be assigned to this project will vary and fluctuate based on many factors, such as final funding agreements with METRO, when funds will be available, project schedules and phasing, approval process and durations by jurisdictional and regulatory agencies, approval of environmental reports, right-of-way acquisitions, and many other factors. As such, the work on this contract will be on a time and material and as -needed basis. The submitted staff rates will be used for negotiation with the selected consultant for the scope of works, tasks, and payments. The project fee will be billed on a time and material basis, with detailed staff timecards indicating actual time spent with a description of the tasks performed as backup. Transtech's Standard SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES for all staff classifications is provided on the following page. FEE PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11 Project Management Services Related to SR -710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects �a TRANsrEch Fee Proposal Below is Transtech's Standard SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES for all staff classifications. Rates are average, negotiable and can be modified to establish a fee for each assignment based on the specific project's scope, when such projects are identified by the City. ENGINEERING Field Technician $85-95 Engineering Technician $90-100 Assistant CAD Drafter $105-115 Senior CAD Drafter $130-140 Associate Designer $130-140 Senior Designer $145-155 Design Project Manager $175-185 Assistant Engineer $135-145 Associate Civil Engineer $140-150 Senior Civil Engineer $185-210 Traffic Analyst Technician $95-110 Associate Traffic Analyst $135-145 Senior Traffic Analyst $145-155 Professional Transportation Planner $170-185 Traffic Engineer Technician $90-100 Associate Traffic Engineer $135-145 Traffic Engineer $170-180 Senior Traffic Engineer $185-195 Project Manager $185-195 Senior Project Manager $195-210 Deputy City Engineer $155-165 City Engineer $165-175 Principal Engineer $200-215 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES Effective through June 30, 2022 CONSTRUCTION Labor Compliance Analyst $135-145 Funds Coordinator $145-155 Utility Coordinator $150-160 Office Engineer $130-140 Construction Inspector $140-150 Senior Construction Inspector $150-160 Construction Manager $195-205 Resident Engineer WORKSPUBLIC Public Works Inspector $195-205 • $140-150 Senior Public Works Inspector $150-160 Supervising PW Inspector SURVEY D MAPPING Survey Analyst $160-165 $135-145 Senior Survey Analyst $145-155 2 -Man Survey Crew $320-330 Survey & Mapping Specialist $185-195 Licensed Land Surveyor FUNDING & GRANT WRITING Funds Analyst $190-195 $145-155 Senior Funds Analyst $150-160 Graphic & Rendering Designer $125-135 Grant Writer $155-165 Funds & Grant Project Manager $165-175 3 BUILDING & SAFETY Permit Technician $75-85 Plan Check Technician $90-100 Building Inspector $110-120 Senior Inspector $120-130 Plans Examiner/Checker $140-150 Plan Check Engineer $150-160 Deputy Building Official $150-160 Building Official PLANNING Community Development Technician $55-165 $85-95 Planning Technician $95-105 Assistant Planner $125-135 Associate Planner $135-145 Senior Planner $150-160 Planning Manager ADMINISTRATIVE Administrative/Clerical $170-180 $70-80 Project Accountant $85-95 The above fees will be increased each year July 1st automatically by the percentage change Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim California Consumer Price Index -All Urban Consumers CCPI-U') for the preceding twelve-month period as calculated for February by the U. S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics and published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistic. FEE PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11 Project Management Services Related to SR -710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects TRANSTEch Attachment C Draft Professional Services Agreement PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO SR -710 NORTH CORRIDOR MOBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC.) 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this this Day of , 2021 (Effective Date) by and between the City of Rosemead, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 8838 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead, California 91770 ("City") and Transtech Engineers, Inc., a limited liability corporation, with its principal place of business at 13367 Benson Avenue, Chino, CA 91710 ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing Project Management and Engineering services to public clients, is licenced in the State of California and is familiar with the plans of City. 2.2 Project. City desires to engage Consultant to render such ongoing professional Project Management and Engineering consulting ("Services") as set forth in this Agreement. 3. TERMS. 3.1 Scope of Services and Term. 3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Project TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 2 of 11 Management and Engineering consulting services necessary for the Project, herein referred to a "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a seven (7) year period from Effective date shown above, at the sole and absolute discretion of the City, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of the Agreement, and shall meet any other established shcedules and deadlines. 3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant. 3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City. 3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 3 of 11 be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. 3.2.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City's Representative or his or her designee. 3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant will designates Ahmad Ansari, or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.2.7 Coordination of Services: Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees: Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. 3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 4 of 11 performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.2.10 Insurance: Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit B attached to and part of this agreement. 3.2.11 Safety: Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.3 Fees and Payments. 3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement and shall not exceed $1,500,000 (one million five hundred thousand dollars) from the Agreement date and in accordance with consultant's proposal dated January 14, 2021. Consultant's proposal is hereby incorporated and found in Exhibit A. Extra Work may be authorized in writing, as described below, and will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses: Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City. 3.3.4 Extra Work: At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 5 of 11 work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City's Representative. 3.3.5 Prevailing Wages: Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft; classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.4 Accounting Records. 3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection: Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.5 General Provisions. 3.5.1 Termination of Agreement. 3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination: City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination: If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents/ Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 6 of 11 provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.5.1.3 Additional Services: In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: Transtech Engineers, Inc. 13367 Benson Avenue Chino, CA 91710 Attn: Ahmad Ansari Tel: (909) 595-8599 CITY: City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: Gloria Molleda, City Manager Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality. 3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property: This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 7 of 11 Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts: The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.5.5 Attorney's Fees: If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of such action. 3.5.6 Indemnification: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its directors, officials officers, employees, agents or volunteers. TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 8 of 11 3.5.7 Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.5.8 Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Los Angeles County. 3.5.9 Time of Essence: Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.5.10 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants: City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.5.11 Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties. 3.5.12 Assignment or Transfer: Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.5.13 Construction; References; Captions: Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 3.5.14 Amendment; Modification: No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.5.15 Waiver: No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 9 of 11 3.5.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries: There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.5.17 Invalidity; Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.5.18 Prohibited Interests: Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City's Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.5.19 Equal Opportunity Employment: Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.5.20 Labor Certification: By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.5.21 Authority to Enter Agreement: Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 3.5.22 Counterparts: This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 10 of 11 3.6 Subcontracting. 3.6.1 Prior Approval Required: Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. [Signatures on next page] TRANSTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Page 11 of 11 CITY OF ROSEMEAD By: Gloria Molleda, City Manager Date Attest: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Rachel Richman City Attorney Date Date TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC. 2 Name: Title: [If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR Vice President AND Secretary, AND CORPORATE SEAL OF CONTRACTOR REQUIRED] By: Name: Title: EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL FOR SERVICES/ RATE SCHEDULE/RESUME A-1 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth here, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to City. Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO "insured contract" language will not be accepted. Automobile liability insurance: Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non -owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than 1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) if used to meet limit requirements, shall provide coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Any such coverage provided under an umbrella liability policy shall include a drop down provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary but covered by the umbrella. Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured's liability is determined, not requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross liability exclusion precluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to City for injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage provided is subject to approval of City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1 Million per occurrence. C-1 Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the consultant and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the state of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of A- or better and a minimum financial size VII. General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010. Consultant also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent. C-2 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at City option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice to City of any cancellation of coverage. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, or that any party will "endeavor" (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Consultant or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self insurance available to City. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 11.Consultant agrees not to self -insure or to use any self-insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self -insure its obligations to City. If Consultant's existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self- insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 12. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. C-3 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five days of the expiration of the coverages. 17.The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all- inclusive. 19.These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20.The requirements in this Section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. C-5 S E M F CIVIC PRIDE MkM7 efP 14C ORPORATEO Attachment D Proposals Submitted Four (4) Firms • Consulting AV • JMD, Inc. • Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. • Transtech Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING V PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROPOSAL NO. 2020-11 Project Management Services Related To SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects PREPARED FOR Chris Daste Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 SUBMITTED BY CAV CONSULTING Chris A. Vogt, PE I President/Owner 17130 Van Buren Blvd., Ste 526 Riverside, CA 92504 direct 951.616.4925 cvogt@cavconsultinggroup.com CAV Consulting CONSULTING January 14, 2021 Chris Daste Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Re: Proposal to Provide Project Management Services to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects Dear Mr. Daste: CAV Consulting is pleased to submit our proposal to provide Project Management Services for the SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects. We are proposing a team of experienced, professional staff who have the qualifications and skills to provide a variety of top-quality services to meet the City's needs. Our staff has the experience to work as an extension of City staff by working independently while providing the City with full communication so there are no surprises. CAV Consulting has teamed with Mark Thomas&Company(Mark Thomas)to provide additional project management services and diverse understanding of the design of complex projects to support project management and program management for the projects listed in the City's RFP. Mark Thomas will support CAV Consulting on as needed basis for project management, program management,technical and planning studies,constructability reviews,civil engineering design support,and contract development. They have extensive experience throughout the state providing. — local agencies with a "turn-key" project management services that includ- program and construction management,civil and structural engineering review, landscape architecture, land surveying services and Right-of-Way acquisition ° Il11 41 - We understand that the City of Rosemead is seeking a qualified firm to provide project management and program management services for the SR • gut 710 Mobility Improvement Projects. The services will be under the direction ` ' ..N z; t'*- 1111LIPnlita of the Director of Public Works and will be from initial project developmenta 'It �b through the end of construction and project closeout.The projects include the following: • I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Westbound Ramp Improvements($6,000,000) • I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway Westbound Ramp Improvements($6,000,000) • Adaptive Traffic/Adapted Traffic Responsive Control Project, Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove, and Rosemead ($9,000,000) • Traffic Signal Improvements, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley($6,000,000) It is understood that this work will be completed on an"as-needed"basis. CAV Consulting provides expert services in areas including public works,city engineering, planning and building and safety. Our team has"hands-on"experience in Project Management,Program Management,CIP development and implementation, plan checking services, development conditioning and entitlement processes, development and oversite of Public Works Operations,Construction Management,Constructability Reviews, Public Works Inspection,and Traffic Engineering.We also Page 12 CAV Consulting provide interim Public Works Director/City Engineer, Community Development Director, Building Official, and City Traffic Engineer services.Our team has extensive experience as City employees as well as working for private industry,so we know what is expected on both sides of the counter. Mark Thomas is ideally suited for Project Management and Program Management to support complex transportation infrastructure projects involving Caltrans oversight. They have earned a reputation for providing their clients with quality deliverables and innovative project management on every project.They have delivered hundreds of similar projects requiring interchange improvements and modifications, signal modifications, and complex right-of-way and utility impacts. They are experienced in the development of technical studies, construction and design procurement documents,feasibility analysis, final PS&E, and overall program management. CAV Consulting's blend of extensive and diverse experience and certifications enables us to work effectively with all City departments for the successful delivery of projects.Our company consists of seasoned professionals,all experts in their respective fields,with a goal in ensuring the success of our client's programs and projects.The combined experience of our professionals,through years of working on both sides of the counter,enable us to assure the successful delivery of projects within schedule and budget.Being a smaller firm,we are able to focus on the City's goals and objectives.We are dedicated to consistency. Once an assignment has been made,we do not change staff unless directed by the City.There will be no"bait and switch"that tends to happen with larger, less connected firms. We view the keys to serving Rosemead as follows: ✓ Providing all services in a responsive and transparent manner ✓ Assigning high quality, experienced staff and maintain consistency ✓ Coordinating effectively with other city departments and outside agencies ✓ Providing a high level of customer care to ensure success for internal and external customers ✓ Full and open communication so there are no surprises The staff members proposed for this assignment were carefully selected based on our understanding of the Scope of Services. Mr. Chris A.Vogt, P.E. is the President/Owner of CAV Consulting and will serve as the Senior Project Manager and Key Contact to the City of Rosemead. He is the Principal-in-Charge and has the authority to sign all necessary agreements. Please don't hesitate to contact me directly if you have any questions or would like additional information about how we can assist the City. Chris A. Vogt, PE I President/Owner 17130 Van Buren Blvd, Suite 526 Riverside, CA 92508 direct 951.616.4925 cvogt@cavconsultinggroup.com • Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Rosemead. Sincerely, President/Owner Page 13 `W CAV Consulting Table of Contents Cover Letter 2 Section 1.Approach and Scope of Work 5 Section 2. Project Team, Key Personnel,and Resumes 10 Section 3.Company Qualifications 20 Section 4.References 28 Section 5.Standard Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements 29 Section 6.Addenda Acknowledgement 31 C PageI4 AW CAV Consulting Section 1. Approach and Scope of Work Project Understanding CAV Consulting understands that the City is looking for an experienced and qualified Consultant Firm to provide Project Management and Program Management Services for the following four(4) SR-710 Mobility Improvement Projects: • I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Westbound Ramp Improvements • I-10/Walnut Grove Freeway Westbound Ramp Improvements • Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project(Garvey,Valley, San Gabriel,Walnut Grove, and Rosemead) • Traffic Signal Improvements(San Gabriel, Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley) The services requested are for the overall project and program management from initial project development through the end of construction and project closeout.These services include but are not limited to the following: • Provide overall project and program management of the projects from initial project development thru the end of construction and project closeout. • Coordinate all projects and activities with involved agencies and stakeholders, including the City of Rosemead, adjacent local agencies that may be impacted by the proposed improvements or may have received funding from METRO in the adjacent areas, METRO, County, Caltrans, and any other agencies and organizations that have jurisdictional control, regulatory agencies, and stakeholders as necessary. • Prepare necessary request for proposals, notice inviting bids, agreements, and assist in the selection of various consultants. Services that will be provided by various consultants may include project design, environmental services, right-of-way acquisition, engineering services, geotechnical engineering services,traffic engineering services, surveying, and various other services to be determined as part of the project development as necessary. It is understood that these services will be provided under the direction of the Director of Public Works on an as-needed basis. Project Management The challenges in delivering Projects within the City's schedule and budget are ,. ever increasing with diminishing resources within the City. We believe Project � . , � � h- iv!ql wig" Management and Program Management starts with the complete understanding of the City's goals and the constraints of the project's funding sources and schedules. For these reasons,it is imperative that a strong project manager haveFP j r— � . ! ;; �► � ` r r a full understanding of all aspects of each project and the potential hurdles that .4,44 I-- may be encountered. Our philosophy is to assign each project to a highly skilled and experienced project manager that will remain on each assignment from the beginning to its final completion. This means complete ownership of all project ' ' aspects including project development,funding/budgeting,oversite of consultants, 7x coordination with staff, project delivery,and final closeout.This approach ensures ,4 the institutional knowledge and continues the momentum throughout the project. s , by providing a consistent project manager. Our team is successful in delivering Capital Improvement Projects by fostering an environment of teamwork, collaboration, and cooperation with all stakeholders in a project. We have discovered that treating each of the participants in the project,from City staff through design team and ultimately the construction contractor, as part of the project team, creates an atmosphere of cooperation in obtaining a common goal. That goal is the successful completion of a project within budget and schedule with minimal claims. Too many times we have witnessed the failure of the project due to the"us against them"attitude between the contracting agency and the successful bidders on a project. We have been able to avoid this through partnering at the project beginning. CAV Consulting fully understands what is required for Project Management services since our staff has served a number of municipalities in Southern California in a similar capacity.We provide a seamless integration of municipal service professionals in support of public agencies. With increasing demands for project delivery, along with decreasing budgets and resources, Cities are faced with the challenge of providing capable and experienced individuals to manage and coordinate their projects Page I 5 AW ° CAV Consulting and to ensure proper completion according to the local, state and federal policies and procedures. Full communication with all parties involved in each project is essential,as well as complete and accurate documentation. An understanding of the existing policies and procedures and positive working relationships with the key personnel is also essential for successful project delivery within schedule and budget. We propose to perform the following: ✓ Develop project descriptions and scopes to determine budgets and delivery schedules ✓ Assist in the identification and procurement of necessary regulatory permits ✓ Prepare necessary internal communications to provide the City with regular status updates regarding project schedule, budgets,potential issues, and other items of interest or concern ✓ If requested,prepare City Council staff reports, technical memoranda, or issue papers on projects ✓ Conduct project outreach to external stakeholders as directed by the City ✓ Manage the design team during the preparation of final plans, specification, and estimates ✓ Manage project bidding and oversee construction support and construction management/inspection ✓ If required, ensure the process is performed in adherence to Federal, State, and Local Agenies(i.e. FHWA/FTA, Caltrans, City)guidelines ✓ Manage and coordinate with the Right-of-Way Team which handles rights-of-way negotiation and acquisition assistance We take the following approach to all projects: Review of the Original Project Scope,Budget,and Schedule:Many CIP projects do not begin until months,sometimes years, after they are originally developed. Items such as the original project cost estimates, municipal regulations and standards, and physical changes to the project site may have occurred prior to advertising the project for bid. We have even experienced times when utilities may not have been coordinated and soft-cost may not have been included in the project budget, requiring updates to the project scope, budget and schedule. CAV Consulting begins each project by reviewing the existing budget, schedule and goals of the City to minimize impacts to the project that may occur if the former listed issues are not addressed and resolved. We then work with the City to identify additional funding sources if necessary and address any of the project parameters that may have changed from the project inception. We will work with the City as directed to develop an outreach plan to ensure that the project addresses the community sensitivities,values, and needs. Request for Proposals(RFPs)for Professional Services: We will provide support services to the City during the Project Development and Design Process including the following: ✓ Draft RFPs for advertisement by the City ✓ Work with the City to Develop Criteria for Rating the Proposals ✓ Coordinate with the City to Form a Proposal Review and Rating Panel ✓ Coordinate the Review of the Submitted Proposals with the Selected Panel ✓ Coordinate and Conduct Interviews with the Top Ranked Proposers(if needed) ✓ Draft City Council Report(s)for Professional Contract(s)Award Bidding and Construction Support: We will provide support services to the City during the bidding process including the following: ✓ Coordinate with the Design Consultant to Review and prepare responses to RFI's ✓ Coordinate the Review of Contractor submittals and shop drawings for compatibility with design ✓ Coordinate the Bid Opening with the City and Bidders ✓ Review the Submitted Bids to determine the Low Responsible Bidder ✓ Check the Contractor's Credentials, Licenses, and References ✓ Draft a City Council Report for Project Award ✓ Work with the Construction Manager to Conduct the Preconstruction Conference Page 6 Cr CAV Consulting During construction,we will provide supplemental support to the City including: ✓ Attend weekly Construction Team meetings as the City Representative ✓ Review and provide recommendations of change order proposals as negotiated by the Construction Manager ✓ Performing final review and assisting with the preparation of punch list for work deficiencies ✓ Draft the City Council Staff Report to approve the Final Adjusting Change Order,Authorize the Filing of the Notice of Completion and Release of the Remaining Retention ✓ Assure the completion of the record drawings by the Design Consultant based upon the redlined set of as-built plans provided by the Contractor Communication with City: Complete communication with the City is critical to minimize surprises and deliver a project successfully within budget and schedule. We will continually bring urgent project issues to the City, along with recommended solutions.We also continually communicate with the Project team and the City as follows: ✓ Weekly meetings with the City to review staff report agendas, CIP procedural or program issues ✓ Weekly project status meetings with the Project Management staff to review project status ✓ Regular meetings of Project Development Teams on key capital projects ✓ Discuss and resolve conflicts in the field with the City and the Project Team Managing Project Budget and Schedule:Our Project Managers carefully monitor project budgets and schedules weekly throughout the project. We closely track the work of all members of the project team to ensure budgets and schedules are adhered to.The Contractor is directed to provide the schedule of work indicating the Project Critical Path items. After the schedule is secured, the Project Manager and Construction Manager review the schedule to determine its viability and coordinate issues that might arise that may be unknown to the Contractor. After approval of the schedule, and approval by the City, the Notice to Proceed will be issued to the Contractor. Our Project Manager monitors the team members to ensure the work is done within the scope of services and the Project remains within the approved budget and schedule. Work with Utility Agencies on Rro, Relocations: CAV Consulting will work with the Utilities that are irorod Rorymak s 30°/0 .Conn.Det mires 5% r.. S /Mg,As.&,in Design (Malnim.tri} • ign pelogsrion„aoo,`, PosRrve location of Wit-; SUPenor Rights Analysts Claim of liability, affected by the Project to properly Utalty Owner Verification” w; Liability Determination Est mate o•mfro coordinate all parties' efforts. This will minimize project delays and cost Replacement over-runs during the construction Rights Process. It will also protect newly Final Design Agee y constructed infrastructure and omed work for minimize the impacts to the nR"°war OR community. It is good practice to Approval of inn Compensates start coordination with Utility Relocationand Sdiededuk, Owner Utility Relocation d Eodget Perform Work Companies during the early R/W 5etare development stages of a project and Certification RePRights a continue coordination and communication throughout all Issue Notice to Owner to project stages. Relocate This team is well versed in Traditional Caltrans Utility Coordination Process coordination with process. Some of the key elements we have utilized to help minimize the back-end risk with unforeseen relocations or liability of costs are to provide an early jump on the following: ✓ Positive Location—Ensuring the design consultant supplies the City with ample utility potholes, electromagnetic detection, GPR, and topographic survey to adequately depict the location of all utilities. ✓ Advance the Liability Determination— Typical coordination relies on the Utility Owners to determine prior rights after the relocation claim letters are sent to the owner. This is way too late as the design is often close to 65% and doesn't allow flexibility to change the design where the City might own costly relocation. This team will work with the City's design and real estate consultant during initial mobilization phases to pull record maps, as-builts, and title reports to analyze what facilities are in by franchise agreements, state encroachment permits, or may have prior rights. Page 17 * . :. CAV Consulting ✓ Utility Owner Focus Meetings—Approaching the Utility Owners in pre-design meetings to discuss their facilities and the overall project to better understand the complexities of their relocation and identify tentative relocation options. As the design progresses, conducting either field walks or routine focus meetings with each of the Utility Owners with conflicts to ensure their relocation plans are compliant with the project design. ✓ Utility Agreements— Working with the City and the Utility Owners just after relocation claim letters and notices are sent to develop utility agreements. This team will work with the City legal staff to either adopt the Caltrans templates where appropriate or develop City templates outside of Caltrans Right of Way. These usually take 6 plus months from initiation to full execution due to two sets of legal entities reviewing the document and generally requiring City Council approval. Initiating these efforts is critical as they need full execution prior to achieving Caltrans R/W Certification and often impact the development of the relocation plans. Based on our initial research and review of the Project Environmental Document, SCE has potential conflicts to their overhead transmission lines crossing Interstate 10 at the Rosemead Boulevard interchange. Between both interchange projects, twelve (12) AT&T telecommunications poles and fifteen (15) overhead electric distribution/transmission poles will be impacted by the project. Prior to the development of design or acquisition services RFPs,this team will identify all ownership through Underground Services Alert, verify conflicts identified to date, and meet with utility owners as necessary to adequately scope utility coordination requirements. Additionally,we will continue coordination and research efforts through construction to ensure utility relocations are compatible with the project improvements and goals. Right of Way Acquisition Support: The Project Environmental Document identified up to thirty (30) private property acquisitions associated with the two interchange projects, including one full acquisition. Additionally, many of these are commercial retail/mall centers at the Rosemead Boulevard interchange which have high potential for severances damages and potential loss of business good will. This team has had great success conducting the following approach to managing projects with complex acquisition. 1) Prepare Property Impact Statements to establish purpose, need, and overall impacts then conduct Right of Way Focus Meetings to review the following elements and craft an acquisition strategy for each property: a. Lease/business operational impacts that could lead to full acquisition/relocation. b. Potential for unforeseen significant loss of business goodwill claims. c. City land use/zoning/setback conflicts/fire code required access conflicts. d. Impacted parcels not included within the Area of Potential Effect (A.P.E.)/Project Area Limits requiring NEPAICEQA re-validation. e. Treatment Control BMP requirements for potential additional fee acquisition. f. Sound wall requirements, including temporary construction access and long-term maintenance access for potential footing/maintenance easements. g. ADA compliancy issues for width and obstructions at sidewalks and driveways for potential additional fee acquisition. h. Sign/Light/Signal Pole foundation and equipment conflicts for potential additional fee acquisition/easements. i. Side slope requirements per local agency/Caltrans requirements. j. Additional landscape/slope repair areas adjacent to improvements. k. Temporary work areas and construction easements for accessibility and constructability needs, including areas where restricting usage of the temporary easements could have substantial acquisition cost savings. I. Utility service relocation/clearance issues for potential easements. m. Potential areas for replacement rights for known utility conflicts. n. Identified impacts that cannot be acquired under the threat of eminent domain. 2) Strategize with project team in identifying opportunities to optimize the right of way footprint that will result in avoiding and/or minimizing impacts along the corridor. 3) Identification of post construction and potential cost to cure mitigation solutions, including: a. Driveway and access vertical and horizontal replacement existing/proposed sections b. Loss of parking replacement c. Horizontal/vertical layout alternatives to avoid long lead/high-cost parcels d. Building/structural modification opportunities to avoid full acquisition/relocation Page 18 c CAV Consulting 4) Development of a Risk Management Matrix illustrating suggested alternative approaches/risk management items per parcel and distribution to the Project Team. Providing a "surgical" approach yet very detailed and focused plan eliminates the surprises that often create delays or unforeseen costs. Carrying the focus meetings with the acquisition consultant,their appraisal team,and the design team through the appraisal process is also critical to ensure changes are captured and included and the acquisition team has a clear understanding of the rights necessary to acquire for the project. This strategy was recently utilized on the McKinley Grade Separation Project for the City of Corona involving 14 complex commercial retail properties similar to this project. City anticipated original acquisition budgets of approximately$25 million and through a series of value engineering efforts and right of way workshops,the"Surgical Approach" in our planning saved over$5 million in acquisition costs to the City of Corona. Keep the same Project Manager Assigned to a Project from "Cradle to Grave":This approach ensures institutional knowledge and consistency from the project development through construction completion and closeout. Other key steps in the process include: ✓ Coordinate project advertisement in local media ✓ Provide documents and plans to bidders ✓ Keep track of all of those who have purchased or shown interest in the project ✓ Send out any and all addenda/correspondence as necessary. ✓ Provide pre-bid meeting services ✓ Coordinate the bid opening with the client(date, time and place) ✓ Create a staff report and resolution awarding the project to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder ✓ Coordinate with contractor to sign contract ✓ Coordinate with client to prepare fully executed contracts ✓ Submit a Notice to Proceed to the Contractor Grant Application/Funding Assistance:This team has supported local agencies throughout California secure additional funding through numerous types of grants and funding programs. Mark Thomas assisted local agencies in securing over $150 million in state and federal funding programs in 2020. Based on an initial review of the two interchanges improvement projects,additional funding may be secured through the following programs: Local Partnership Program: LPP provides $200 million in SB 1 funding annually to local and regional transportation agencies that have passed sales tax measures, developer fees, or other imposed transportation fees. The program is very flexible and can be used to fund roadway and highway improvements, active transportation facilities, transit improvements, and sound walls. Roadway maintenance improvement projects need to provide 15 years of useful life.A Cal B/C model is required for each submittal. The program requires a 50% match of requested funding from the local agency, approved environmental document prior to requesting the allocation of requested funds, and the project to demonstrate a net neutral or better for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)in the after condition. Most recently, Mark Thomas secured the following LPP funding through the completive Cycle 2: ✓ City of Sacramento—I Street Bridge: $15 million ✓ City of Eastvale—Limonite Gap Closure Project: $9.5 million ✓ Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission—Highway 1 Improvements: $14 million If any of the projects can multimodal incorporate bike lane improvements along South Walnut Grove Avenue consistent with the City's General Plan or improvements that could enhance or improve the LACMTA Route 266 bus line would greatly enhance the potential to secure LPP funding. Active Transportation Program: ATP provides funding bicycle and pedestrian improvements. The program is a mix of federal and state funds, including SB 1. There is no requirement for matching funds, but it is encouraged. 25%of funds must go to disadvantaged communities. There are two opportunities for ATP funding; one at the State level and one through the Metropolitan Planning Organizations(i.e. LACMTA).Given the proximity to the Savannah Elementary School and anticipated bike lanes along South Walnut Grove Avenue per the City's general plan,the City may be eligible for ATP funding for the next Cycle (Cycle 6 due in 2022). Most recently, Mark Thomas is awaiting initial results from the Cycle 5 ATP application to support the County of Orange for the OC Loop—Segments 0, P, &Q. Page 9 CAV Consulting Section 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, & Resumes Based on the City's request, we have proposed the best suited staff led by a Senior Project Manager with the skill set aligned with the critical aspects of the specific need. Staff proposed will be experienced at working in a municipal environment, nurturing positive relationships with affected parties, and collaborating with both internal and external stakeholders to deliver the project on time and within budget.Given the wide range of possible projects,we have included a representative team of professionals ready to serve the City. City of Rosemead Chris Daste Director of Public Works Chris A. Vogt, PE Senior Project Manager Principal-in-Charge I Project Management Project Management Chris A.Vogt, PE Darin Johnson, PE Viren Shah, PE Josh Cosper,PE Page 10 gal CAV Consulting The majority of CAV Consulting Staff experience has been in the public sector as City Officials and City Staff. Since we have all left public service, we have continued to provide services exclusively to Public 4 Sector Clients. Below are the cities and Counties we have worked in 11 either as staff or as consultants: Chino Hills Beaumont Grand Terrace La Quinta Palm Springs Laguna Niguel Pomona Indian Wells San Gabriel Moreno Valley Rancho Mirage Monterey Park Wildomar Corona Rancho Cucamonga 'a Bell San Bernardino Fontana West Covina Redlands Riverside CountyN.tol .:, San Marino Yucaipa San Bernardino County , We will provide highly qualified staff led by an experienced Project Manager to deliver projects and services to meet or exceed the City's expectations. Our staff has experience at working in a municipal environment, nurturing positive relationships with affected parties, and collaborating with both internal and external stakeholders to deliver the project on time and within budget. Given the wide range of possible projects,we have included the following team of professionals ready to serve the City. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Chris A. Vogt, PEI Senior Project Manager Chris has over 37 years of successful management, planning,implementing,and administering public works projects and programs. He brings a solid history of successful management with over 24 years as a Public Works Director/City Engineer for a number of Cities in Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties. He brings an exemplary work ethic focusing on continuous process improvements while maintaining the ability to effectively navigate politically sensitive environments.Supporting cities in Southern California,Chris has a wealth of knowledge in project management, program management, budget preparation, infrastructure maintenance, professional and construction contract negotiations, organizational development, water, sewer and electrical utility operations and construction, engineering design, staff development, training and mentoring, complex engineering studies such as Development Impact Fees and assessment engineering, and public informational and collaborative meetings. Chris is a professional who brings solutions to our clients. He is flexible and his communication style fosters a teamwork atmosphere in resolving challenges. Viren Shah, PEI Project Manager I Plan Checker Viren has decades of expertise providing project management, program management, administration, management and engineering services on Capital Improvement Projects.This experience has made him familiar with the design and construction of projects including transportation facilities, public works, industrial, commercial and residential development. Viren is very comfortable providing contract administration, project scheduling,claims avoidance, quality assurance, reporting, engineering plan checking, specification review, request for proposals (RFPs), budgeting and bid preparation for both public works and private enterprises. His extensive background in the industry has also given him a working knowledge of related fields including environmental mitigation, drainage, soils, structures, surveying and land planning. Viren has been employed in a variety of capacities such as Senior Engineer, Design Engineer, Plan Check Engineer, Project Manager and Construction Manager.Over his career, he has honed his ability to effectively coordinate with owners,clients,consultants,contractors and public agencies. Page I11 Ci- CAV Consulting MARK THOMAS — PROJECT MANAGERS Darin Johnson, PE I Project Manager Darin brings more than 34 years of experience in transportation and municipal engineering, project management, and QA/QC reviewing for a range of complex transportation improvement projects including highways and interchanges,new bridges,bridge rehabilitations, replacements, and widenings, retaining walls and sound walls, interchange and roadway widenings, and traffic and operational improvement projects. He has delivered numerous transportation projects on Caltrans facilities and is intimately familiar with the Caltrans approval process and requirements. He also brings extensive experience with local agencies and has developed strong relationships with agency staff throughout Southern California. Josh Cosper, PEI Project Manager Josh has more than 16 years of experience as a successful project manager on numerous transportation and roadways projects providing civil design, right of way engineering and land survey services. He has completed over 50 roadway, and drainage infrastructure projects in Southern California.Most recently,Josh has served(or actively serving)as program manager/technical lead for complex highway corridor and airport projects including the 1-405 Improvement Project for OCTA, SR 91 for RCTC, McKinley Grade Separation Project for Corona,Inglewood Transit Connector for the City of Inglewood,and the Landside Access Modernization Program for the Los Angeles World Airports where his innovative value engineering techniques have resulted in the saving of millions of dollars in acquisition costs. He has recently focused his efforts to program management of all phases of projects from the environmental documentation to final design with many years of relevant experience and relationships throughout the Los Angeles County area and Caltrans District 7. Page 112 .z` CAV Consulting TEAM RESUMES Page 113 CA CAV Consulting Chris A. Vogt, PE Project Manager CONSULTING Chris has over 37 years of successful management, planning, implementing, and ) administering public works projects and programs. He brings a solid history of successful management with over 24 years as a Public Works Director/City Engineer for a number of Cities in Los Angeles,San Bernardino,and Riverside Counties. He brings an exemplary work ethic focusing on continuous process improvements while maintaining the ability to effectively navigate politically sensitive environments. ,..,.„^; He has managed an operational budget of over $39 million and a comprehensive Capital ; Improvement Program in excess of $1.6 billion. Supporting cities in Southern California, Chris has a wealth of knowledge in budget preparation; infrastructure maintenance; professional and construction contract negotiations; organizational development project .Nr management; water, sewer and electrical utility operations and construction; engineering design; staff development; training and mentoring; complex engineering studies such as Development Impact Fees and assessment engineering; and public informational and EDUCATION collaborative meetings. Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering Chris is a professional who brings solutions to our clients. He is flexible and his University of Pittsburgh communication style fosters a teamwork atmosphere in resolving challenges. He is Pittsburgh,PA committed to serving the needs of the client through strong leadership and a collaborative REGISTRATIONS approach. CERTIFICATIONS CA Registered Civil Engineer 144250 Specific Experience PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Executive Vice President I Public Works Director I City Engineer I Senior Project Manager 2019-2020 Annealta Group APWA-American Public Works Association,Southern California Chapter Chris provided project management, planning, developing, implementing, and President 2012 administering public works projects and programs for clients throughout Southern APWA-American Public Works California. His projects included: developing and implementing capital improvement Association,Coachella Valley Branch of programs and development impact fees; staff training, mentoring and management; Southern CA, direction and supervision of professional, technical and maintenance staff; program President&Creator,2000-2001 management over consulting contracts (design and construction management APWA-American Public Works professionals); completion of specialty projects; and coordination of issues with public Association,Inland Empire Branch of utilities. Southern CA, Board of Directors,1992-1997 Inland Empire/Coachella Valley Regional Manager I Public Works Director I City Engineer City/County Engineers Association Project Manager Inland Empire President,1996 2012-2019 Interwest Consulting Group Chris developed and managed the Inland Empire/Coachella Valley Regional office.His duties included: interim Public Works Director and City Engineer assignments, project management,planning,developing,implementing,and administering public works projects and programs for clients throughout Southern California. His projects included:developing and implementing capital improvement programs and development impact fees; staff recruitment, hiring, training, mentoring and management; direction and supervision of professional, technical and maintenance staff; program management over consulting contracts; completion of specialty projects; analysis of the purchase and conversion of private utility owned street lights;and coordination of issues with public utilities. Director of Public Works I City Engineer 2006-2011 City of Moreno Valley Managed a Public Works Department of 145 professional,technical, maintenance and clerical staff with an operational budget of$39 million and Capital Improvement budget of $180M (comprehensive $1.6B). Public Works included seven divisions: Administration, Engineering Land Development, Traffic, Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance (solid waste, street, storm drainage, graffiti, and fleet), Special Districts, and the Moreno Valley Electric Utility. Select Accomplishments: - Completed a$25 million electric sub-station project and participated on the City's bond team - Reorganized the new City Electric Utility CONSULTING - Completed a$1.6 million Veterans Memorial project within schedule and budget by working with a citizen design committee - Directed staff in the development of a comprehensive Capital Improvement Program that reflects all projects to ultimate build-out of the City($1.6 billion) - Coordinated City regional projects with Caltrans, Western Riverside Council of Governments, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission - Completed a$10 million regional soccer facility(synthetic turf) - Renegotiated the City's Solid Waste Contract resulting in enhanced services and full indemnification under AB 939 without additional costs to the City Director of Public Works I City Engineer 2001—2006 City of Pomona Supervised the Public Works Department of 97 professionals, which included Administration, Engineering, Development,Traffic, Capital Improvement Projects, Streets, Stormwater, Graffiti Abatement, Facilities Maintenance, Building and Safety, and City Communications. Select Accomplishments: - Developed a comprehensive Capital Improvement Program - Developed a bond issue with Gas Tax proceeds to complete$10 million worth of street rehabilitations and improvements - Completed$2 million White Avenue beautification project fronting L.A.CountyFairgrounds - Established and implemented the City's Graffiti Abatement Program that improved removal time to 24 hours Director of Public Works I City Engineer 1996—2001 City of La Quinta Managed the Public Works Department of 20 professional,technical,and clerical staff.This included Administration, Engineering, Development, Traffic, Capital Improvements and Street Maintenance. Select Accomplishments: - Coordinated the development and implementation of La Quinta's first Development Impact Fees - Updated the City's$800K/year Lighting and Landscape Assessments to conform to Proposition 218 - Completed a$500K community pool and locker room/office facility project within schedule and budget utilizing the design/build process - Completed a$20 million assessment issue and coordinated the construction associated with the assessment for public sewers,street improvements,and a downtown beautification project Director of Public Works I City Engineer 1991-1996 City of Chino Hills Held multiple positions while serving the City of Chino Hills.Was appointed as the City's first Director of Public Works/City Engineer when the city incorporated in December 1991. Established and directed the Public Works Department of 55 employees under six divisions. These divisions included Administration, Engineering Design and Development,Traffic and Roads,Water,Sewer, Drainage, Utility Operations,and Facilities/Vehicle Maintenance and Operations, and the Parks and Landscape Maintenance Division Select Accomplishments: - Completed the$10 million extension of the ultimate improvements to Chino Hills Parkway - Developed the first Public Works Department for the City of Chino Hills afterincorporation - Supervised a$13M/year Water Utility operational budget for the City - Developed the first Pavement Management System for Chino Hills - Developed and Streamlined the Final Map and Developer Entitlement process Viren Shah, PE Project Manager CONSULTING Viren is a Professional Civil Engineer with over thirty-nine years of program and project Amanagement experience in public works and private construction. He is a dependable, initiative-taking and purposeful collaborator with a reputation for effective execution. Viren has a wealth of experience in Project Management and Plan Checking Services. He is also a past Planning Commissioner for the City of Corona. SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE Project Manager/Plan Check Engineer 2019—Present VAS Associates, Inc. Viren provides plan checking, project management and construction document review services on an as needed basis for City and County Clients. Project Manager/Sr. Engineer/Plan Check Engineer • 2015—2019 Interwest Consulting Group EDUCATION Viren provided Project Management services for the City of Palm Springs'and City of Eastvale's University of Texas,Austin Capital Improvement projects including Design Management, Right-of-Way, Environmental Masters of Science Clearance, Utility Coordination, Preparation of Bid Documents and Construction Construction Management Management. He also provided plan checking services for residential and commercial University of Bombay,India development projects for the County of Riverside and cleared a 13-month backlog of work in Bachelors of Science the County.The plan checks included grading,drainage,and hard-scape improvements. Civil Engineering Collaborated with the Developers,their engineers,and the County Staff/Departments in coordinating the plan checking services. REGISTRATIONS CERTIFICATIONS Project Manager 2006—2013 VAS Associates, Inc. CA Registered Civil Engineer 152790 Provided project management services to execute City of Moreno Valley Public Works Capital PROFESSIONAL Improvement projects with Design Management, Right of Way Acquisition, Environmental AFFILIATIONS Clearance, Utility Coordination, Bid Documents and Construction Management. The Planning Commissioner street projects he managed included the ultimate expansion of Nason, Cactus, Kitching, Iris, City of Corona Lassell,and Pigeon Pass Road. He was also Project Manager over the Aqueduct Bike Trail. Nason, Kitching Pigeon Pass (Honorable Mention), and the Aqueduct Bike Trail all Toastmasters Club Vice President received APWA Project of the Year Awards. Transportation Engineer 2001—2006 City of Corona Viren managed the Transportation division including Transportation Planning, Regional Transportation Coordination, Transportation and Transit Funding and Programming through Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure A), Western Riverside Council of Governments (TUMF) and CALTRANS. He wrote Grants writing for ITS projects, Bicycle Transportation Account, Safe Routes to School, Hazard Elimination System, Community Based Transportation Planning, Office of Traffic Safety,Transportation Enhancement, and AQMD/MSRC programs. He also managed the City's Transit Program. Project Manager 1999—2001 Software Implementation Viren managed multiple projects for implementation of Oracle Corporation Enterprise Resource Planning software and the associated consulting services. Associate Engineer 1996—1999 City of Fontana CONSULTING Viren implemented and Managed Pavement Management program. He also managed the _ Storm Drain and Sewer Capital Improvement Program including budgeting, design contracts, development of contract documents, and the delivery of construction projects. Assistant Engineer II 1994—1996 City of Corona Viren managed the City's NPDES program including Permit negotiations. He acquired federal funding and managed FEMA and FHWA funded emergency repairs to City- Wide infrastructure damages. He coordinated updates to the City's Drainage Master Plan and FEMA Flood Maps. Resident Engineer/Construction Manager 1993—1994 South Corona Developers Consortium Viren managed the design and construction of Public Works Infrastructure to build$55 Million in master-planned streets,water,sewer and storm drain facilities for City of Corona. Assistant Engineer II 1989—1993 City of Corona Viren reviewed Development Applications and recommended conditions for the Planning Commission's consideration. He worked on the formation of Community Facilities Districts to raise $100 Million to build public infrastructure required to support the development. He supported the management of the budgeting, design, and construction of the infrastructure. Branch Manager 1988—1989 Pacific Coast Building Products Viren managed a Construction Contracting Branch location for the Company. He was responsible for Branch operations including sales and marketing, budgeting, cost accounting, estimating, project management,and field operations. Division Manager 1985—1988 Alpha Group of Companies Viren managed this construction contracting company. His responsibilities included company operations, sales and marketing, accounting, budgeting, cost accounting, estimating, project management and field operations. Project Manager/Corporate Cost Engineer 1980—1985 Sabine lndustries/ACMAT Corporation Viren developed and Implemented a "Corporation-wide" automated Construction Cost Accounting system for this Construction Contracting multi-branch operation corporation. He managed high-rise building construction contracts. S\ 4 MARK • • THOMAS V / RESUME 3 JOSH COSPER, PE, PLS,QSD Josh has more than 16 years of experience as a successful project manager on numerous transportation and roadways projects. His experience includes the . _ h program management of right of way/right of way engineering for over fifty(50) miles of highway projects within Southern California. He has served as either the program manager or technical lead responsible for various disciplines including civil J design, utility coordination, right of way acquisition/engineering for numerous . - contracts. His expertise has been used on conventional,design-build, P3,CMAR, and CMGC project delivery contracts with transportation agencies including RCTC, SBCTA, LACMTA,and OCTA. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PROJECT ROLE Sr.Project Manager MCKINLEY STREET GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT, CORONA(2019-ONGOING): Program Manager responsible for management of the design and right of way EDUCATION consultant firms developing improvement plans for a grade separation over the BS in Civil Engineering, existing at-grade BNSF railroad crossing. Project includes management of complex University of California, Irvine,2005 partial property acquisitions, coordination with utility companies/CPUC/BNSF, review of all project deliverables, securing project funding, and developing a co-operative REGISTRATION agreement with the County of Riverside. Josh was responsible for developing value CA C71667 engineering efforts leading to substantially less impacts to properties and over$5 CA PLS 8774 CA QSD 00709 million in savings to the City in acquisition costs. Josh was also responsible for utility coordination, including the development of utility agreements,and coordination with ADDITIONAL PROJECT other jurisdictional agencies including BNSF and the County of Riverside. EXPERIENCE SR-91 Corridor LANDSIDE ACCESS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM, LAWA(2017-ONGOING): Improvement Project, Right of Way Program Manager responsible for all right of way engineering efforts and RCTC utility coordination/relocation planning support, including management of the land net • 1-15 Express Lanes,RCTC Devore Interchange, boundary retracement survey for approximately 100 properties, preparation of the • SBCTA entire program's acquisition documents, and curative site exhibits to support right of 110 Corridor way acquisition and appraisal efforts. He is also a senior advisor to LAWA's real estate • Improvements,SBCTA and legal staff for all real estate transactions.Josh assisted in the development of • I-405 Corridor several engineering/construction procurement documents including P3 and Design Improvement Project, Build contracts to support the program. The project consisted of the construction of OCTA an automated people mover,widening improvements to the I-405/La Cienega • Barton Road Interchange, Boulevard interchange, and utility/drainage/roadway infrastructure improvements SBCTA throughout the Los Angeles International Airport greater area. • 1-605 PA/ED North and South Segments,LACMTA INGLEWOOD TRANSIT CONNECTOR, INGLEWOOD(2020-ONGOING): Centennial Corridor Right of Way Engineering Program Manager responsible for responsible for ROW Improvement Project, engineering and utility mapping deliverables for this 2 mile raised track automated Bakersfield people mover system that connects the LAX Transit through downtown Inglewood to • Westside Parkway, Bakersfield the Los Angeles Rams/Chargers/Clippers sports stadiums. Josh is responsible for the preparation and oversight of all utility mapping, subsurface utility engineering, and positive location for approximately 2.5 miles of corridor. He is also responsible for supporting the City in the development of all right of way requirements necessary for the project. Josh is also leading key portions of the procurement documents for a public private partnership project to design, build,operate,finance and maintain the people mover system. LA MARK st is THOMAS RESUME DARINJOHNSON,PE Darin brings more than 34 years of experience in transportation and municipal d engineering, project management, and QA/QC reviewing. He brings knowledge of a range of complex transportation improvement projects, including new bridges, complex structures,tunnels, highway interchange, and roadway widening improvement projects. He has delivered numerous transportation projects on Caltrans and railroad facilities and is intimately familiar with the CPUC approval process and requirements. He has extensive experience with local agencies and has developed strong relationships with agency staff throughout Ventura County. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PROJECT ROLE Sr.Project Manager MCKINLEY STREET GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT, CORONA(2019-ONGOING): Program Manager responsible for management for the overall project. Project includes EDUCATION management of complex partial property acquisitions, coordination with utility BS in Civil Engineering, companies/CPUC/BNSF, review of all project deliverables, securing project funding, North Dakota State and developing a co-operative agreement with the County of Riverside. Darin is the University, 1983 MBA in Management, direct point of contact to staff and the City Council for the major facets of the project. Georgia State University,1989 He is also responsible for the coordination with Caltrans for approvals through a DEER REGISTRATION process. Darin is responsible for the development of all RFPs, RFQs,and NIBs to procure a construction management firm, construction contractor,and demolition CA C46405 contractor including evaluation of the bids/proposals and conducting interviews with ADDITIONAL PROJECT City staff. He is an extension of City staff and has provided all staff reports, EXPERIENCE programming requests, public outreach presentations and presentations to the City • I-10/Monterey Council throughout the PS&E phase of the project. Avenue Interchange Improvements,Palm SR-60 INTERCHANGE/POTRERO BOULEVARD, BEAUMONT(2018-ONGOING): Desert I-405/Sand Canyon Senior project manager responsible for overseeing the preparation of PS&E Avenue Interchange, documents to construct a new SR-60 interchange connection.The project creates a Irvine new Type L-9 interchange that will provide full access to SR-60 at Potrero Boulevard. I McCall Potrero Boulevard will be a six-lane facility between Willow Springs Parkway and Boulevard Interchange,Menifee Western Knolls Avenue.The existing eastbound SR-60/San Timoteo Creek Bridge • Sand Canyon crossing is being widened to accommodate a two-lane off-ramp and a westbound Avenue Grade auxiliary lane to be constructed. Separation, Irvine Limonite Gap Closure Project, SR 60/THEODORE STREET INTERCHANGE, MORENO VALLEY(2014-2018): Eastvale Engineering manager responsible for the design improvements and reconstruction of 1-15 Auxiliary Lanes, the existing SR 60/Theodore Street Interchange.The goals of this project are to Temecula correct existing geometric deficiencies, increase capacity, and improve operations at the interchange. Improvements include bridge structure removal,intersection reconfigurations,traffic signal construction, and gateway interchange aesthetics. 1-10/JEFFERSON STREET INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS, INDIO (2013-2017): Engineering manager responsible for the preparation of PS&E documents for the I- 10/Jefferson Street Interchange improvements.This project balances several complex geometric constraints to eliminate the discontinuity of the arterial street through movements within the interchange.The modifications included replacement and relocation of the Jefferson Street/I-10 overcrossing, additional loop on-ramps, and realignment of Varner Road/Jefferson Street. Section 3. Company Qualifications CAV Consulting is committed to providing the expertise and resources required to support our clients with professional services to successfully meet or exceed their goals. We provide municipal services supporting public works, city engineering, planning and building and safety. Our team consists of professionals with years of service in the Public sector. We work well with staff in all City Departments, outside agencies, the development community, and the public to achieve your organization's goals and successfully navigate and overcome project challenges. By incorporating a "Customer Care"philosophy,we have a successful track record of the delivery of services and projects on time and within budget. Qualifications of CAV Consulting CAV Consulting has the experience, certifications, and expertise to assist our clients to successfully complete projects within schedule and budget. Our services include supporting and completing assignments in public works, city engineering, planning and building and safety. CAV Consulting's dedicated and professional staff bring a wealth of expertise in their respective fields with over 322 years of combined experience. Our diverse experience includes many years working as Public Employees and Officials. We also are fortunate to have many years of experience in the Private sector, enabling us to be well aware of the motivations and challenges from both sides of the counter. We know and understand the expectations of a City because we have had those same expectations throughout our respective careers. Customer Care is of high priority to achieve success for our clients as well as all of the City's clients, businesses, and residents. We provide the following services to cities/counties: ✓ Project Management _ ✓ Construction Management ✓ Construction Inspection ✓ Program Management YJ�it ✓ Planning ✓ Building Inspection ✓ Development Plan Review and Entitlements ✓ Capital Improvement Development and Implementation :44 a � ✓ Engineering Plan Checking ✓ Building Plan Checking ✓ Permit Technician ✓ Development Impact Fee Analysis ✓ Streetlight Conversion Cost Assessments ✓ Development of Department/Division Policies and Procedures ✓ Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Services ✓ Interim Community Development Director Services ✓ Interim Building Official Services ✓ Organizational Assessments ✓ Traffic Engineering Services CAV CONSULTING STRENGTHS Cities are continuing to face staffing challenges; however, the demand for project delivery and services continues to increase. CAV Consulting can fulfill those City needs with our experienced professionals. More importantly, we can provide those services on an as needed basis. This provides much needed support to the Cities based on their current Page 120 demands without the additional liability the City would face with full time staff. We adjust service levels to meet the City's needs. All of our staff have held executive management, senior level, associate level, and staff positions with numerous California cities including former Public Works Directors, City Engineers, Projects Managers, Program Managers, Construction Managers, Senior Engineers, Public Works Inspectors, Community Development Directors, Chief Building Officials, Building Inspectors, Permit Technicians, and Management/Staff Analysts. Our experience, Licensing, Certifications, and training is important since serving in the capacity of a local agency representative requires credibility and expertise in working with the community and the City's customers. We bring the following philosophies and work ethic to our Clients: ✓Customer Care Service.Our philosophy is that every person we have contact with is considered a customer. It is important that each person we come in contact with knows that we believe their project of issue is very important to the City. We pride ourselves in providing a level of service that will meet or exceed our client's expectations. V Correct Staff Assigned for Services Needed. We provide experienced staff with the correct licensing, certifications,training and experience to effectively and efficiently deliver projects and top-quality services. V Effective Coordination with all City Staff, outside Agencies, the Development Community and the Public. Our staff have effectively communicated and coordinated with other City divisions and departments and all City Clients including the public throughout our careers. The City staff is a team and should not have to deal with Departmental bafflers. Our philosophy is the success of the City's customers results in the overall success of the City and the community. V Project Controls. We closely monitor the projects and services we provide to the City to stay within the Local, State and Federal requirements, including but not limited to, the City's Municipal Code, California Contract Code, General Code, and City's Charter. Our experience and attention to details allows us to deliver projects within budget and schedule. We proactively communicate with the City Staff to head off any"surprises"that may occur during a project. As the City's needs arise, we will propose the experienced professional that is the best fit for the City and the duties required by the City.Our staff has the experience at working in a municipal environment,developing positive working relationships with affected parties, and supporting both internal and external customers to deliver projects and services within budget and schedule. Qualifications of Mark Thomas Mark Thomas provides program management, construction management, civil and structural engineering, landscape architecture, planning & urban design, and surveying services to clients throughout California. Since the company's founding in 1927, Mark Thomas has focused on providing excellent client service and delivering projects with a tailored approach to meet our clients' goals. We have been working closely with public agencies to deliver cost-effective transportation infrastructure enhancements. Our Southern California clients include the cities of Los Angeles, Los Angeles World Airport, Port of Los Angeles, Inglewood, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Orange County,and Corona. The Mark Thomas team is ideally suited for program management to support complex transportation infrastructure projects involving Caltrans Oversight.We have earned a reputation for providing our clients with quality deliverables and innovative project management on every project. We have delivered hundreds of similar projects requiring interchange improvements and modifications, signal modifications, and complex right of way and utility impacts. Our team is experienced in the development of technical studies, construction and design procurement documents, feasibility analysis,final PS&E,and overall program management. Page 121 Similar Services and Experience CAV Consulting has significant relevant experience in serving municipalities on a wide-range of assignments in a variety of roles. Our extensive experience, including serving in the management roles of Public Works Director, City Engineer, Planning Director, Building Official, Project Manager, Senior Engineer, Plan Check Engineer, Construction Manager and Inspector enables us to successfully deliver projects and provide valuable services to our clients. The following are some of the examples of our relevant experience: City of Indian Wells—Project Management, Engineering, and Building Services Ken A. Seumalo, PE Public Works Director/City Engineer 44-950 Eldorado Drive Indian Wells,California 92210-7497 Direct(760)776-0237 CAV Consulting Staff provided Project Management and Engineering Support Services on projects that are in the current approved City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). We also provided Building and Safety Services including Permit Technician and Counter Services, and Building Plans examiners services both over the counter and offsite. • Camino Del Rey Overlay Project "Chris brings a wealth of experience and professionalism • Eldorado Drop Structure Improvements to every project. As a former Public Works Director/City • RFP Process for On-Call Design Services Engineer, he understands the importance of meeting the • Counter Permit Technician Services needs of the community to build a quality project that is on schedule and under budget" Counter Plan Checking Services Christopher J.Freeland • Building Plan Check Services City Manager CITY OF BELL —Project Management and Engineering Services 0 Joe Perez CITY HALL Former Community Development Director 6330 Pine Avenue Bell,California 90201 Cell(562)882-2706 Page 122 CAV Consulting Staff provided Project Management and Engineering Support Services to aid the City in rebuilding its Public Works and City Engineering Department/Division after the City scandal. The projects and programs developed and implemented were as follows: ✓ Project Manager and City Representative on the Gateway Technical Advisory Committee during discussions of the SR-710 project mitigations ✓ Developed specifications and bid/selected Public Works Maintenance Services ✓ Developed specifications and bid/selected Facilities/Janitorial Maintenance Services ✓ Completed City Streetlight Cost Analysis for purchasing Southern California Edison(SCE)owned streetlights and converting them to LED ✓ Supported City in the Purchase of the Streetlights through negotiations with SCE ✓ Drafted RFP and supported the City in the Selection Process for Streetlight Conversion and assumption of the Maintenance/Operations of the new City Streetlight System • Analysis,combining, and the re-bidding of the City's Landscape Maintenance Contracts ✓ Drafted the RFP and supported the City for the contracting of a new Graffiti Abatement Service ✓ Completed Annual Engineers Assessment Reports ✓ Project Management for the refurbishment of the Camp Little Bear Surfacing ✓ Developed bid specifications and supported the City in selection of a Contractor for mobile home demolition and removal, including hazardous material abatement for six(6)mobile homes owned and operated by the Bell Community Housing Authority(BCHA) CITY GRAND TERRACE — Interim Public Works Director/ City Engineer, Project Management, and Building Services Alan French, PE Former Public Works Director/ I City Engineer 0 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,California 92313-6621 ar } ;,, Cell(951)2754506 CAV Consulting Staff provided Interim Public Works Director/City Engineering Services, Project Management. We also provided Building and Safety Services including Permit Technician and Counter Services, Building Plans Examiners and Assistant Building Official services.The projects and services we provided were as follows: ✓ Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer "Chris has been a mentor to me for many years. His ✓ Trained and Mentored the new Public Works Director/City Engineer extensive experience, work ethics, and collaborative and ✓ Project Manager on the Commerce Drive Street Construction Project professional approach encourages staff to think outside of • Counter Building Permit Technician Services the box and fosters creative new approaches to solving ✓ Counter Building Plans Examiner Services complex issues." ✓ Assistant Building Official Prem Kumar,PE City Engineer,City of Manhattan Beach Page I 23 CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL — Project Management, Engineering Operations, Construction Management and Inspection Services . Jacki Scott, PE,TE . .. ,'I Public Works Director/City Engineer =li,. 30111 Crown Valley Parkway Laguna Niguel,California 92677 �.�.,, Direct(949)362-4385 9 2011,RA.Hansrr .._._._.._. CAV Consulting Staff provided Project Management and Engineering Support Services on a number of projects as follows: • Drafted the Policies and Procedures Manual for the Streets Maintenance Division ✓ Project Management, Construction Management,and Inspection Services for three(3) Park Improvement Projects ✓ Project Manager, Construction Management and Inspection of the Alicia Parkway Reconstruction Project ✓ Project Manager over a$37 Million New Community Center Construction Project(multi-prime) Development and implementation of a Citywide Seven Year Slurry Seal Program for all City Local Streets CITY OF CHINO HILLS — Director of Public Works/ City Engineer, Project Manager, Program Manager MON Robert Van Nort ., gym-', CFN7gp R'' ec , Former City Manager(retired) lI _ 14000 City Center Drive I ! '= *, "' _ Chino Hills,California 91709 IP Cell(775)291-2758 1.. Chris A. Vogt, PE was the first Director of Public Works/City Engineer for the City of Chino Hills. Prior to incorporation, he was the Project Manager in charge of all construction in the unincorporated area of Chino Hills. His major assignments were as follows: ✓ Public Works Director/City Engineer Project Manager and Key City Representative on the SR-71 Ultimate Widening Project ✓ Project Manager and Key City Representative for the Phillips Ranch Road Bridge Widening Project over the 60 Freeway • Project Manager and Key City Representative on the SR-71/60 Freeway Interchange Project Page I24 CITY OF San Marino — Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer John T.Schaefer Former City Manager 2200 Huntington Drive .. i San Marino, California 91108 ti; •prig ' - - CAV Consulting Staff provided Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Services to the City of San Marino. Major accomplishments included: ✓ Completed the RFP process for the completions of the City's Pavement Management System ✓ Managed the day to day operations of the Public Works Department ✓ Drafted Staff Reports and attended City Council Meetings ✓ Reviewed and signed Final Maps ✓ Project Manager and City representative for the Huntington Drive Regional Beautification Project CITY OF BEAUMONT — Interim City Engineer Services D.'l l r w ks tc `�` Kyle Warsinski 'i.-; ~^ i 44. .- Development Services Director itt !�z> ; ... 550 E.6th Street '''" 7 4Beaumont,California 92223 t, '-i/.. , # Direct(951)769-8527 CAV Consulting Staff provided Interim City Engineer Services for the City of Beaumont. The services that were provided include the following: ✓ Oversite of the Engineering Division ✓ Review of a one-year backlog of professional invoices ✓ Complete the RFP Process for Plan Check and Inspection Services ✓ Review and condition development projects ✓ Meet with the Development Community ✓ Update Engineering Standards ✓ Attend City Council Meetings ✓ Analyze and complete recommendations of the City's Sewerage Treatment Plant ✓ Support the City on the recruitment of the City's permanent Public Works Director/City Engineer ✓ Project Manager the Portrero Bridge Project over the 60 Freeway(Mark Thomas and Company design firm) Page 125 Mark Thomas teamed with Chris Vogt to jointly complete elements of the Potrero Bridge project for the City of Beaumont. Mark Thomas prepared PA&ED and PS&E documents to construct a new interchange connection to SR-60 at Potrero Boulevard. Work included preparation of a project report, environmental document and technical studies.The design includes roadway and freeway design, bridge structure design, retaining wall design,traffic signal and ramp metering design, hydrology and hydraulic analysis,storm water quality assessment, utility relocation coordination, right of way engineering,and field survey.This project was completed through coordination with Caltrans District 8 and Riverside County Transportation Commission(Federal, State,and Local Funding). CITY OF WEST COVINA — Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Chris Chung ; Former City Manager jJ 1444 West Garvey Avenue West Covina,California 91790 Cell(909)732-3486 CAV Consulting Staff provided Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Services to the City.These services included the following: "Chris'collaborative style,experience,and teamwork attitude are highly effective in delivering difficult assignments in a timely ✓ Oversight of the Public Works Department and Operations basis.His professional demeanor is very effective in Public ✓ Analysis of the City's streetlight costs Meetings and he provides high quality services." ✓ Calculated monthly savings for conversion of SCE streetlights ✓ Supervised,trained and mentored Public Works Staff Mike Lee ✓ Project Manager/City Representative: 1-10 corridor Improvements Former Assistant City Manager Moreno Valley City Manager CITY OF POMONA — Public Works Director/City Engineer - Project Manager DougDunlap I 1 �,a,� ,rI 1'I i t .- Former City Managr(retired) 505 S.Garey Avenue �^ Pomona,CA 91766 Cell(714)747-7338 CAV Consulting Staff provided Public Works Director/City Engineer Services to the City. Similar Projects worked on were as follows: ✓ SR 71/Mission Blvd. Interchange Project(MTA Funding) ✓ Widening and Beautification of White Street fronting the Pomona Fairgrounds Page 126 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY — Public Works Director/City Engineer - Project Manager f CITY H#LL O Robert G.Gutierrez 5gLuAtFormer City Manager wan 14177 Frederic Street 11111 P.O. Box 88005 Moreno Valley, CA 92552-0805 001 Cell(909)4554304 CAV Consulting Staff(Chris A.Vogt-Public Works Director/City Engineer and Viren Shah—Contract Project Manager) provided a number of services to the City of Moreno Valley including the following: • Project Management for the Nason Street Access Ramps at the 60 Freeway • Moreno Beach Blvd/60 Freeway Interchange—Phase I ✓ City Representative and Project oversight of the 60/215 Interchange • Project Management for the Cactus Street Widening CITY OF CORONA —Project Manager, Program Management Services Rodger Bradley Assistant City Manager 400 S.Vicentia Avenue Corona,California 92882 (951)739-4903 Rodger.Bradley@coronaCA.gov Mark Thomas is providing comprehensive program management services for the City of Corona to construct a grade separation facility over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe(BNSF)tracks south of SR 91. The Grade separation includes the construction of a steel tied arch bridge structure to be built on-site and moved over the railroad crossing, numerous types of retaining wall facilities, and substantial impacts to commercially zoned private properties and utility facilities. Mark Thomas supports the City in the review/approval of all project deliverables and invoices,development of City council administrative reports and presentations,conducting public and private focus meetings,and day to day management of the project. Mark Thomas was instrumental in leading workshops and value engineering to minimizing risks/costs/impacts to adjacent property owners through commercially reasonable design changes. Page 127 Section 4. References Our staff has dedicated their careers to serving government agencies.The following are clients that are familiar with our staff's success in the delivery of services and projects. We encourage you to contact them. City of Grand Terrace Alan French ✓ Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Former Director of Public Works ✓ Public Works Management 22795 Barton Road ✓ Project Management Grand Terrace,CA 92313 ✓ Building Permit Technician Counter Services Cell(951)275-4506 ✓ Building Plans Examiner Services afrench@ci.upland.ca.us ✓ Assistant Building Official Services City of Indian Wells Ken Seulmalo ✓ Project Management Director of Public Works ✓ Plan Checking 4-950 Eldorado Drive ✓ Permit Technician Services Indian Wells,CA 92210 ✓ Building Plans Examiner Services (760)776-0237 kseumalo@indianwells.com City of Bell Joe Perez Former Community Development Director ✓ City Engineering Services 6330 Pine Avenue ✓ Program Manager Bell,CA,90201 ✓ Project Manager (562)882-2706 jperez@jurupavalley.org City of West Covina Mike Lee V Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Former Assistant City Manager ✓ Public Works Management Current Moreno Valley City Manager V Project Management 14177 Frederick Street Moreno Valley,CA92552-0805 (951)413-3020 mikel(a.moval.orq City of Moreno Valley Robert G. Gutierrez ✓ Public Works Director/City Engineer Former Moreno Valley City Manager V Project Management 14177 Frederick Street Moreno ✓ Program Management Valley,CA 92552-0805 Cell(909)455-4304 rgootz@verizon.net Page 128 CAW. CAV Consulting Section 5. Standard Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements We have reviewed the Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements that were included with the Request For Proposal No. 2020-11 issued by the City on December 3, 2020. The following are our comments: Green indicates an addition,and red strikethrough indicates a deletion. 3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees: Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner,consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services.Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct 3.2.9 Laws and Regulations.Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local,state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend,indemnify,but not defend, and hold City,its officials,directors,officers,employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement,from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination: City or Consultant may, by written notice to Consultant,terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination,and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation.Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.5.5 Attorney's Fees: If either party commences an action against the other party,either legal,administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of such action. 3.5.6 Indemnification:To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, but not defend,and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to, but only to the extent actually caused by the negligent-may alleged acts, omissions or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and Page I29 ' w CAV Consulting contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services,the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against City, its directors,officials, officers,employees, agents or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any,received by the City, its directors, officials officers,employees,agents or volunteers.Consultant has no obligation to pay for any of the indemnitees'defense related cost prior to a final determination of liability or to pay any amount that exceeds Consultant's finally determined percentage of liability based upon the comparative fault of Consultant. 3.5.12 Assignment or Transfer:Consultant shall not assign,hypothecate,or transfer,either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City.Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. City shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the Consultant. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. Page 130 < 0 CAV Consulting Section 6. Addenda Acknowledgement This statement is to acknowledge we have received and reviewed Addendum No. There have been no Addendums issued for this RFP. Page 131 CAW CAV Consulting Proposal to Provide Project Management Services for SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects RFP No. 2020-11 i ._ ...... ... . ...._. . . ___-"4"411111111rite.„ r Li .s _ . . w, A - . n ._ 1001043 ,�- FE w SYAPWIR =t — ttf —' t. r� w ,,,,,,i , ti w, 3AffE4._ - i.�rtMn ..u.y, '3NI4Gt.,f SNAVIEUM Y ( n K * ittart q ,,,,MET sant Et aa.[,. ' Eur°its y: _ m .. .t EC3NBE5 wa... d _ d. ousost i77..,:....,:,w a✓Y "� .�_. .M:' ,m.. -_.. b.Cl[i0..4N§If1 Prepared for Prepared by (0 OSE EAD : . JIvID lod.ry'c small torn Alllorh-t PLANNING I ENGINEERING I MANAGEMENT 01.14.2021 JMD January 14, 2021 Mr. Chris Daste Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 2020.1112.0048.00 SUBJECT: Proposal to Provide Project Management Services Related to the SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects (RFP No.2020-11) Dear Mr. Daste: JMD, a local San Gabriel Valley firm, is pleased to submit this proposal to provide Project Management Services for the SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects in the City of Rosemead (City). Our proposal, which remains in effect for a period of 90 days, has been prepared in accordance with the City's Request for Proposals, RFP No. 2020-11 and dated December 3, 2020. Leadership You Can Trust — We have assembled a comprehensive project team with extensive local knowledge and SR-710 North Study experience to assist the City in managing projects intended to improve access, circulation and capacity in the City. JMD's objective is to assist the City in achieving its goals in a timely and responsive manner with minimal review time by City staff. Assigned to this important project is one of our most qualified, experienced, diverse and local Project Managers, Algis J. Marciuska, MBA, PE, a licensed Civil Engineer registered in the State of California, with over 35 years of transportation and municipal experience with expertise in highways, civil, traffic and municipal engineering. He has served as Project Manager for SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements for the City of San Gabriel where he oversaw the development of the SR-710 North Study and various projects including highway interchanges, roadways, "hot spot" intersections and coordinated or adaptive traffic signals. Unique SR-710 North (Gap) Study Experience— Members of the JMD Team have unique SR-710 North Study experience and developed key design projects in the study area which includes the City of Rosemead north of Interstate 10. These capacity enhancement projects include: • Interchanges • Arterial Corridors • "Hot Spot" Intersections • Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit Corridors • Adaptive Signal and Traffic Signal Synchronization Corridors JMD staff understand the reasons and objectives behind the study area projects which are essential for uninterrupted project development going forward. 18645 East Gale Avenue, Suite 212, City of Industry, CA 91748 (626)820-1137 Tel • (626)820-1136 Fax www.jmdiaz.com JMD Mr. Chris DastO January 14, 2021 Page 2 Comprehensive Project Management, Project Knowledge&Multidiscipline Expertise—Essential to the success of the development of the subject projects is the perfect blend of comprehensive project management, project knowledge and technical expertise covering various disciplines from highways to traffic analysis and design. The JMD Team offers such a blend with a wide project management spectrum complemented by intimate project knowledge and multidiscipline expertise to meet the needs of the subject interchange and signalized corridor projects. The JMD Team's ability to do the actual work it will oversee consultants perform adds a layer of verification essential for successful projects. In addition, our Team includes a Project Manager who represented the City of San Gabriel in the development of the SR-710 North Study as well as the team that developed many of the multidiscipline projects in the study area designed to enhance safety, access and capacity. In addition to management and technical expertise, our Team, known as a mediator, will carefully handle sensitive issues and bring people together as needed. Our team will help maintain project focus while helping to mend any sensitive area(s)between the City and Metro regarding this SR-710 North(Gap)Study program. As Project Manager, Algis J. Marciuska will be the primary representative and main point of contact to the City. I am the individual authorized to negotiate contract terms and enter into legally binding commitments. Algis and I are locally trained and graduates of Don Bosco Technical Institute located in the City of Rosemead. We are committed to achieve the City's goals. I will also be responsible for ensuring our Project Manager has the support and resources needed for each project. During the project schedule, I will be ready to serve as an alternate Project Manager to perform the services described in the scope of work, if needed. We are excited about the possibility of serving the City of Rosemead and firmly believe we have numerous benefits to offer including: • A Local Project Manager and Team with Extensive SR-710 North (Gap) Study experience • A Project Team with expertise in highways, roadways and coordinated signalized corridors • A responsive, innovative and cost-effective approach and a reputation for quality We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal for your consideration on these important projects and look forward to your favorable reply. Should you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at(626) 820-1137 ext. 1101. Sincerely, JMDiaz, Inc. 0 /Juan M. Diaz, MB� President/CEO Page 12 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Table of Contents ES. Executive Summary ES-1 Section I. Approach and Scope of Work I-1 Section II. Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes 11-1 Section III. Company Qualifications I11-1 Section IV. References IV-1 Section V. Standard Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements V-1 Section VI. Addenda Acknowledgement VI-1 Tables and Figures Figure 1 —City of Rosemead Map and Proposed Projects 1-3 Figure 2—Interchange Process Flow Chart 1-7 Figure 3—Adaptive Signals/Traffic Signals Coordination Flow Chart 1-8 Figure 4—Project Schedule—Combined Projects 1-10 Figure 5—Sample Adaptive Signals Project Schedule 1-11 Figure 6—Sample Interchange Project Schedule 1-12 Figure 7—Proposed Organizational Chart 11-2 Table 1 —Current Workload and Availability 11-3 Note: Fee Proposal submitted under separate cover. JMD Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Section ES Executive Summary vJMD Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Executive Summary Executive Summary these projects from its Industry office, minutes away from City offices. JMDiaz, Inc. (JMD), a local San Gabriel Valley firm committed to improving our SGV communities, is JMD has an extensive record on a variety of major pleased to offer extensive knowledge as well as highway,traffic, railroad and transit projects in the San comprehensive management and technical expertise Gabriel Valley(SGV) region including Metro's SR 710 for the successful development of the subject projects. North (Gap) Study and Los Angeles Countywide ITS Inventory as well as the Alameda Corridor — East Having served SGV communities for the past 20 years, Construction Authority's (ACE) San Gabriel Trench JMD has a multi-faceted team ready to begin projects. Such record, combined with technical managing these projects focusing on delivering expertise and innovation,has earned JMD a reputation complete projects. JMD, who knows the stakeholders, for providing responsive, value added, cost-effective is ready to manage this mobility improvement program and innovative solutions for major transportation for the City of Rosemead in a comprehensive manner projects requiring sensitivity to local concerns. JMD sensitive to the needs of the City and the project area has successfully served key stakeholders (Cities, LA while fulfilling Metro's vision for the region. Metro, LA County and Caltrans) on freeway, traffic, JMD BRINGS THE CITY: transit and other major transportation projects. Project History • Successful Delivery—Unique project history JMD has worked on the subject SR-710 North (Gap) and state of the art solutions to start running Study and related projects in/near Rosemead since for timely delivery to benefit all. 2011 seeking to enhance capacity to a region • Constructability — A Project Team with a supporting goods movement, regional and local traffic. record of delivering projects with minimal to no Such projects include the following in reverse change orders. chronological order: • Continuity — Uninterrupted project 2018:Metro Projects Priority List,San Gabriel management and oversight relying on JMD's 2015:Los Angeles County ITS Inventory,Metro overall 710 North Study project history and 2011:SR-710 North(Gap)Study,Metro inventory to avoid a learning curve. 2011:On Call Traffic Engineering,San Gabriel 2009:San Gabriel Trench,ACE/City of S.Gabriel • Credibility — A credible Team known for 1996:Grade Crossing Study,SGVCOG mediating to bridge past divides between cities and Metro. JMD assisted the neighboring City of San Gabriel in Comprehensive Service-A turnkey strategy developing a project priority list to seek Metro funding • for the subject SR-710 North Study mitigation. JMD focused on project delivery while assisting City knows the importance of maximizing the City's project staff with Metro reporting and coordination. benefits while meeting Metro objectives. JMD,who successfully led Metro's 710 Gap TSM/TDM Multidiscipline/Local Experience alternative, is a full-service planning, engineering and JMD is a local multidiscipline firm providing multimodal management firm,with 27 local employees. Involved in solutions to transportation projects in the region. JMD analysis, design and management of major staff view projects from many perspectives to identify transportation projects in the region, JMD has notable needs and solutions. Oversight of these complex expertise in highway, traffic, railroad and transit projects requires seeing beyond the data and planning and engineering.JMD serves over 100 clients addressing access, visibility, congestion, risky from its offices in Industry,Anaheim and San Diego. behavior and ADA requirements. These issues are Being responsive and loyal to our municipal clients and very important in the City of Rosemead which has needs has been a hallmark of JMD's service to local significant serving local and regional traffic. cities over the past 20 years. JMD will diligently lead . ■ J IMD p.ES-1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Executive Summary Knowledge of Local Landscape • Developed the SR-710 North Study Mitigation The JMD team understands the importance of these Project Priority List for the City of San Gabriel. projects and the need to develop effective solutions Steven Itagaki, PE,TE, PTOE that improve capacity,without right of way impacts,for the City and the region. Traffic Signals Systems and Lighting • With 30 years of transportation experience,he has Innovation served traffic and lighting needs of local agencies. The JMD Team has developed innovative solutions on • Has multidiscipline expertise and experience in these projects relying on its local knowledge of regional highway,traffic and municipal engineering. patterns and political sensitivities to achieve local • Has served as City Traffic Engineer for various objectives. In fact, the JMD Team developed state-of- cities and has worked closely with Los Angeles the-art projects ITS systems for goods movement County staff on signal timing and service requests corridors relying on transponders, adaptive signals, related to corridors monitored by the County via its reversible lanes,elevated truckways and roundabouts traffic management center. on the SR-710 North Study and the 710 Corridor ElR/EIS projects. • Local SGV presence and experience. Team Commitment Lan Saadatneiadi, PE The JMD Team includes experienced key members, Highways described below, who are highly committed and local. • With over 25 years of highways experience, has Our leadership team's mission is to: developed major freeway projects in the region. "Serve and Meet Client Goals and Needs." • Has been employed by Caltrans, Metro and private sector firms in the development of freeway Alqis Marciuska, MBA, PE improvements throughout Los Angeles County. Project Manager • Has thorough knowledge and understanding of • With 35 years of transportation engineering the Caltrans project development process and key experience, managing multiple CIP and decision makers needed to streamline activities development projects for local agencies as well as for timely development and approval. 710 Gap Alternatives and mitigation projects. Frank Sanchez,PE • Has critical knowledge of City facilities, Construction Management/Constructability infrastructure, &development projects as well as • With 22 years of construction management procedures to assist City staff with Metro. experience, he served as Construction • Has multidiscipline expertise and experience in Management Officer/Inspector for local agencies. highway,traffic and municipal engineering. • Extensive Public Works CIP Experience • Local SGV presence and experience. particularly in diverse communities. Juan M. Diaz, MBA,PE The JMD Team's key members,their knowledge,skills Principal/Technical Advisor and experience are described in Section II: Project • With 35 years of experience, he helped lead the Team, Key Personnel and Resumes. Highway, TSM/TDM, BRT, LRT and freight railroad alternatives for the SR-710 North Study. Understanding and Approach • Has multidiscipline expertise and experience in The JMD Team's understanding, key project issues highways,traffic, rail and transit engineering. and approach are in Section I:Approach and Scope of Work. • Local SGV presence and experience. Management Philosophy Ivan Salvatierra, PE,TE JMD's management philosophy, or plan, to work with ITS Infrastructure City staff and manage performance of services • With 16 years of Traffic and ITS experience has considering JMD's other contracts, is included in developed Adaptive Signal/ITS/TMC Projects for Section I:Approach and Scope of Work. many agencies in Southern California. . . JMD p.ES-2 Project Management Services Related to • SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Section II Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes JMD Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I.Approach and Scope of Work the San Gabriel Trench Project for ACE and the City of Proposed Approach San Gabriel. Understanding Our approach and success begin with understanding the The City of Rosemead is seeking qualified consultant(s) subject project and stakeholders involved. Through its to provide project management services related to the involvement on the SR 710 North(Gap)Study,JMD has SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements projects worked with Metro, agencies and stakeholders in the listed below: development of various alternatives to address the missing SR-710 Gap.Such alternatives include: 1. I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway[Westbound] Ramp Improvements. • Highway Tunnel/Interchanges • 2. 1-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway[Westbound] 7 mile Light Rail Alternative Ramp Improvements. • 10-mile BRT Alternative 3. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project TSD/TDM "Hot Spot" Intersections [Garvey,Valley, San Gabriel,Walnut Grove and Rosemead]. Such SR-710 North Study involvement subsequently led to JMD's development of a priority list of Metro Projects 4. Traffic Signal Improvements [San Gabriel, Walnut for the City of San Gabriel in pursuit of Metro funding Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley]. earmarked for improvements in lieu of a direct highway tunnel connection in the current gap. Key locations for these projects are shown on Figure 1, page 1-3 of this section. JMD understands that the level of work effort and level The services requested are for overall project and of staffing for the requested services depends on various program management from initial project development factors and will vary.We will provide the services on as through the end of construction and project close out. needed basis. The City is in the process of finalizing funding agreements. METRO will inform the City on the availability of final funds and the timing. The project JMD, who developed Metro's SR 710 North (Gap) schedules will be established based on final funding Study, is uniquely qualified to assist the City with the amounts and availability,as well as required process and desired project management services requiring durations for environmental reports, right-of-way multidiscipline technical capabilities. During the acquisitions,review and approvals by the City,as well as development of the SR-710 North Study, JMD staff jurisdictional and regulatory agencies. worked with local agencies to confirm critical needs, identify and define projects as well as refine each project JMD's project management approach involves through coordination with individual cities.As part of this comprehensive oversight of all aspects of each project, process, JMD developed effective and innovative keeping our clients informed on key progress and issues, solutions to address congestion while avoiding or providing critical technical knowledge and relieving City minimizing impacts to local communities in loss of staff of the stress and burden of successfully delivering parking or acquisition of right way. JMD staff proactively projects. By keeping various consultants on task and identified innovative solutions including: schedule, our services help free City staff from time • Adaptive Signals consuming and distracting meetings and correspondence. • Reversible Lanes • Roundabouts JMD staff have managed numerous multidiscipline The JMD team has worked with cities in the SR-710 projects for local agencies and will diligently ensure the North Study area and neighboring jurisdictions including subject projects are led clearly without ambiguity which the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works often results in scope and budget creep as well as (LACDPW) Traffic and Lighting division on various ITS schedule delay. Our focus will be to anticipate problems and Traffic projects. In addition,our Project Manager has before they happen and make adjustments quickly to worked with City of Rosemead staff while coordinating avoid delays. ft a JMD p.1-1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I.Approach and Scope of Work JMD knows the City of Rosemead, its needs and conditions are met in advance as much as possible and local/regional issues over the past decades. Rosemead that proposed projects proceed in accordance with is home to major arterials expected to handle future funding availability. growth in the region with a focus in transit. It is important to understand how each unique corridor impacts Multiple Consultant Coordination adjacent communities and knowing land use The services required can be provided to manage each characteristics and traffic patterns in each neighborhood. project separately in succession or to manage each Knowing the community, the stakeholders, and the project simultaneously. JMD's personnel and broad agencies involved is one of JMD's key attributes to experience on large transportation projects working with successfully manage the subject projects. METRO, CALTRANS, and other agencies provides Key Issues numerous resources to diligently manage several projects involving multiple consultants. The JMD Team has carefully reviewed the subject RFP and has identified some of the key issues anticipated for JMD uses a formal process for requiring submittals and each project based on our past efforts on the SR-710 updates at key project milestones, performing periodic North Study as well as experience on similar projects. audits on the project to ensure progress will meet those The JMD Team will address such key issues by milestones, and tenaciously seeking timely approvals developing conventional, creative and innovative from such agencies as CALTRANS and LA County. solutions,some of which are described below. Successful Project Delivery Communication and Coordination METRO agreements with the City of Rosemead and Keeping the City and funding requirements demand timely project delivery. METRO informed with --To, JMD is committed to helping the City deliver these project updates and status - projects on time and within scope and budget in reports while obtaining City accordance with METRO requirements. JMD will focus feedback on critical —� on long lead items, from the beginning, including decisions is a key issue leading to successful delivery of environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, utility these projects. Multiple stakeholders with similar needs relocation, signal system maintenance agreements and and concerns but with different priorities requires careful service requests with Los Angeles County as well as planning and coordination by a team who knows the special permitting including processing CALTRANS stakeholders and has worked with them before. The encroachment permits and approvals which are key to subject stakeholders include the City, SGVCOG, Metro, avoiding design and construction delays. Los Angeles County and adjacent communities (San Gabriel, Temple City, El Monte, South El Monte, Montebello, Monterey Park, and unincorporated County areas). The JMD Team has worked with all of these - agencies on the SR-710 North Study and understands their sensitivities to negative impacts by the proposed ` �r "� �� projects in their communities. �� _ ro �=. A - rt Project Controls and Tracking Project " ' � "`� Agreements and Funding Monitoring the progress and expenditures on the project is important in avoiding scope creep, preventing cost overruns and keeping the program on its critical path. Tracking METRO project agreements and adhering to Figure 1 on the following page illustrates the map of the funding timelines established for the various projects is City of Rosemead and the locations of the proposed critical to ensuring that projects proceed without process projects. delays. The JMD Team will ensure deadlines and JMD p.i-2 Figure 1—City of Rosemead Map and Proposed Projects City of Rosemead RFP No. 2020-11 SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects : › N ,.:.. F 4'4C, AV 44 C A r.,. .„.„ ., I. 63,_ ,.'.,k, 4 ......- , Walnut Grove Avenue at '• <,, "'" '. %'',:',.;,-(%'-'4 " ,, , '- :j-%; Mission Drive Project ',. fiks7----s, .. ,I,„ R t—,-1.1 LOW , /0/, 1'7 i. ,‘:, i. -• .. ' “ c, NO SELL , i '1 ' -- - "• t'fi. ST EIWEE^, F.SS .. San Gabriel WELLE-..„ ' iv c$'1srSme" .1 V Si _ir, § A5B.:. pWse, ,,j . • _.„_. _ _, W 3 ° L,New Westbound 1-10 at Walnut Grove \ tl Avenue Project - ' ' '‘,.,•"," ca.e..00n vre S i i Jir I, ------_,,----- 1 SAN , DNo_i__ u., CL i ;•1 ,,,,,,,,, ''" 'g ! ;"1 g - _... -- r >r, iia \er cl i ,..,0:.:''':` -----,. -i.e.z•- El.') -7 ' i 6 IR'0-—S—E M E A Ds -1 --L., -" : i ; ; i 0.) ,'.'- ' ,u; InCorPRoMecl August 4 1959 g , 1 ' 1, , g s Westbound I-10 at Rosemead Ao. ff ' Z GARVEY \ < i 3 a " AV Boulevard Project 0 F,:i' ii i d .i ,I ' TS-2 A - ,`: P 4 A V : South El Monte a , ... A .i ,' ,. , '-'; .. , i I - A G.A. 0 R g i n FINS,SINWI ,, ." 5 f , r LA C01 tyt ,•,3 ' 0 LA County i .. '4 Legend - -•,, ** - 1,..L.,-....'—i:4 - - -'----- • TS Traffic Signal Improvement Project Locations San Gabriel Boulevard at Garvey Avenue Project - Adaptive -" Traffic Control N Project-_,_ Project Routes "'"• -',--/- _„,s.A. Montebello -----.tefti :: JMD 1--k.30JE EAD PLANNING I ENGINEERING I MANAGEMENT Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I.Approach and Scope of Work the project development process and facilitate timely Scope of Work review and approval of submittals. Meeting agendas will JMD has prepared a detailed scope of services to be prepared and distributed a minimum of three (3) provide the required services and to manage the project working days prior to the meeting to the City's Project and program in an efficient and cost- effective manner. Manager. Draft meeting minutes will be submitted to the Based on our experience with METRO and City's Project Manager within one (1) week following transportation projects of this type, JMD has identified project meetings. Minutes will include the participant list, the necessary tasks and components of work and will detailed meeting notes and action items for follow up. provide all necessary services, as required. Task 1.02— Record Keeping Our scope of services covers all projects in this The JMD Team will maintain hardcopy and electronic filing and index of documents, drawings, and other procurement with the understanding that each project begins upon attaining project funding and notice to records of the overall program and the individual proceed by Metro and Caltrans(for interchanges). projects. These records can be provided to the City electronically at regular intervals in either format. The • Provide overall program and project management City may choose to receive the records after close out of starting with initial project development through the individual projects. end of construction including project closeout. Task 1.03— Reporting • Coordinate all projects and activities with involved The JMD Team will provide monthly and quarterly project agencies and stakeholders, including the City of status reports and will prepare and submit for City-review Rosemead, adjacent local agencies that may be all required METRO reports and documents. The reports impacted by the proposed improvements or may will document project progress,issues,action items,and have received funding from METRO in adjacent upcoming deadlines. The program report will include a areas, METRO, Los Angeles County, Caltrans,and compilation and summary of each active individual any other agencies and organizations that have project. jurisdictional control including regulatory agencies and local stakeholders. Task 1.04—Meetings The JMD Team will plan and organize quarterly program • Prepare necessary request for proposals, notice review meetings and agency meetings, as necessary,to inviting bids,agreements,and assist in the selection monitor compliance with METRO requirements. of various consultants.Services that will be provided by various consultants can include civil engineering Task 1.05— Metro Coordination design, environmental services, right-of-way The JMD Team will prepare and submit,for City review, acquisition, right of way engineering, surveying, METRO required reports and documentation related to geotechnical engineering, traffic engineering the funding requirements. JMD will keep METRO staff services and various supporting services (e.g., informed on the overall program progress and advise of traffic counts, potholing, etc.) needed for project any issues that require METRO involvement or development. concurrence. JMD's scope of work covers all foreseeable services outlined in the RFP for each project as follows: Task 1.06 — Tracking Metro Agreements and TASK 1 —PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Deadlines The JMD Team will prepare project schedules for Task 1.01 -Overall Program Initiation tracking of agreement milestones and deadlines The JMD Team will attend a kick-off meeting with City established by METRO. Project deliverables from staff to confirm the project scope, establish key consultants will be reviewed for compliance with METRO communication personnel, refine time schedules and requirements. finalize design criteria.After review of the process to be followed, agreement on the approach and schedule will be reached. This will avoid confusion and delays later in ■■ JMD p.1-4 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I.Approach and Scope of Work Task 1.07—City Staff and CIP Support note upcoming work, track milestones, and proactively The JMD Team will assist the Public Works Director and identify issues which could impact the project schedule. City Staff with public information documents, staff Actual progress will be measured in comparison to reports, meeting attendance, and other activities to planned progress to objectively determine whether support the program. JMD will assist the City in project deliverables and expenditures are properly developing project descriptions and budgets for its aligned. JMD's Project Manager will utilize MS Project Capital Improvement Program. Planner, MS Project and MS Excel in developing progress reports to be submitted to the City on a monthly Deliverable(s): Meeting schedules, agendas, minutes basis or more frequently, if preferred by the City. and project schedule materials. Deliverable(s): Meeting schedules, agendas, minutes TASK 2—PROJECT MANAGEMENT and project schedule materials. JMD will provide project management services for each of the four proposed projects. The following tasks will be Task 2.04—Project Schedules implemented for each of the project. The projects can The JMD Team will prepare detailed project schedules run in succession or simultaneously as the program for each project and update the schedules weekly as the schedule requires. projects evolve and develop.Our approach is to translate the scope of services for each consultant and project into Task 2.01 —Individual Project Initiation a definable work breakdown structure(WBS). The WBS The JMD Team will coordinate kick-off meetings with is then sequenced using a precedence format,which can City staff and selected consultants to confirm the project be exhibited as a simple bar chart or a sophisticated scope, establish key communication personnel, refine Critical Path Method (CPM) flow chart. Using proven time schedules and finalize design criteria. After review software such as Microsoft Project Planner will allow us of the process to be followed, agreement on the to standardize the schedule format and facilitate approach and schedule will be reached documented. updates. This will avoid confusion and delays later in the project Task 2.05—Project Expenditure Tracking development process and facilitate timely review and approval of submittals. Meeting agendas will be The JMD Team will prepare detailed spreadsheets prepared and distributed a minimum of three(3)working according to the contracts for each project using the days prior to the meeting to all participants.Draft meeting consultant tasks and respective billings to track and minutes will be submitted to the City's Public Works monitor available budget, resources expended, and Director and the other meeting participants within one(1) resources remaining. This will be done in concert with week following project meetings. Minutes will include the the project schedule monitoring to verify that efficient participant list, detailed meeting notes and action items progress is being made, resources are responsibly used for follow up. on the projects,and scope creep is curtailed. Task 2.06—Consultant Selection Management Task 2.02— Project Record Keeping/Checklists JMD will provide as much consultant selection The JMD Team will maintain records in hardcopy and management for the City as needed. We will support the electronic format and include an index of documents, City by preparing the requests for proposals, assisting in drawings, and other records of the individual projects. the evaluation and review of proposals as well as These records can be provided to the City electronically consultant selection. JMD will verify references and at regular intervals in either format. Checklists for project projects and consultant qualifications. JMD will prepare initiation, design requirements, PS&E development, staff reports and notices to proceed and related bidding/advertising, construction, and project closeout documents needed by the City and METRO to bring will be developed for each project to ensure that such qualified consultants on board. items include METRO requirements, scopes of work, permits, contract requirements, and City standards and Task 2.07—Design Development PS&E procedures in all projects. JMD will manage and oversee the design development phases of the projects. At key milestone completion Task 2.03—Project Updates and Project Reports points such as 50%,90%,and 100%,we will review and The JMD Team will provide monthly updates on the verify that the plans,specifications,and estimates are in various projects with reports that detail progress made, accordance with the scope, METRO requirements, City JMD p.1-5 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I.Approach and Scope of Work standards, Caltrans standards and project budget. The assisting City staff with reporting and coordination with goal will be to obtain environmental and design approval agencies involved. JMD will keep the City staff informed for construction documents that include all work, throughout the life of the program.We will meet with City approvals/permits, traffic control, and staging for a staff early to verify the City's expectations for the projects complete project. and our proposed scope,necessary tasks,schedule and Task 2.08—Advertising/BiddinglContract Award process. Our experienced staff includes a former City Public Works staff who knows the City's process. As JMD will assist the City with preparing the contract Agency Advisor/Liaison, Algis Marciuska will assist City documents for advertising, addressing questions and staff with coordination support efforts to alleviate the addenda during the bidding phase, evaluating and City's workload and ensure that communication with qualifying submitted bids,and preparing staff reports and Metro and the involved agencies is maintained related documents for contract award. throughout the project duration. Task 2.09—Construction Management Our proposed management plan focuses on providing JMD will organize preconstruction meetings for the the City with responsive service including timely and contracts awarded and have periodic progress meetings quality communications, documentation, and controls during the construction phase. JMD will assist with that meet City requirements.This includes providing the processing requests for information to the design depth of resources needed to accomplish each task or consultants, prepare change order documents with project. The JMD Team includes experienced Project necessary, track construction progress, review Managers who know what Metro expects and the City contractor invoices prior to City submittal for payment, needs for successful project delivery eliminating coordinate with permitting agencies and project "learning curve" issues. stakeholders during construction, and work with the design consultants to obtain as-built drawings for the City Through the use of frequent project team meetings, record. JMD will assist Public Works and other City staff conference telephone calls, e-mail and courier service, with project information and announcements regarding the Project Manager will maintain direct contact and proposed construction, street/lane closures, and oversight of the project consultants and ensure that stakeholder notification. project resources are properly directed and utilized where they are needed most to keep the projects on Task 2.10- Project Close Out schedule and within budget. JMD has used this work The JMD Team will prepare files and reports needed for plan approach on typical public infrastructure projects project completion, audits, and City records in ranging in size from small traffic engineering projects to accordance with its retention policy. JMD will ensure the large interchange or corridor improvement projects. We records, such as operating manuals, timing sheets, and encourage you to contact our client references to verify other maintenance and operation information are on file our successful project management. We are confident in the field, with maintenance staff, and in the their responses will be a testament to the success of our Engineering Offices. approach. OPTIONAL TASKS Figures 2 and 3 on the following pages illustrate the Interchange Project flow chart, and the Adaptive JMD can provide optional tasks to support this program of Signal/Traffic Signal Coordination flow chart. projects including such services as construction inspection and quality control services;detailed review and checking of plans and specifications;and value engineering. Client Service JMD's client approach is to be Service-Oriented to keep the overall program and projects moving forward while ii JMD p.1-6 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I.Approach and Scope of Work Figure 2—Interchange Process Flow Chart Final PS&E Design IP pCESS F..OAW CHART Utility Coordination Begin PS&E Preliminary RIW Preliminary Plans(35%) -Roadway Plans -Bridge Type Selection -Drainage Report&Concept Plans -Concept Striping Plans •Concept Landscape Plans -Construction Cost Estimate QAIQC Review PDT AGENCIES County of Los Angeles County/Agency Review 4—. Caltrans Other Agencies Utility Potholing Draft(75%)& Final(100%)PS&E -Roadway Plans -Bridge Plans -Storm Drain Plans Utility Coordination -Traffic Signal&Interconnect Plans Final RAN-Striping Plans -Landscape/Irrigation Plans -Street Lighting Plans Legal Descriptions -Specifications/Special Provisions -Plats(Exhibits) •Construction Cost Estimates - -Construction Staging&Traffic Control Plans QA/QC Review PDT AGENCIES County of Los Angeles -view/Permits 4-0- Caltrans Other Agencies Submit Final PS&E Package JMD Construction Construction Support Services SUCCESSFUL PROJECT JMD P Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I. Approach and Scope of Work Figure 3—Adaptive Signals/Traffic Signal Coordination Flow Chart Model Development &Calibration Gather Existing Data: De verable lack-Off • Traffic Volumes • ExistingConditions Review Existing � Meeting • Existing Timing Conditions: Memorandum • Before Study • Field Investigation • Current Timing Plans i • Collision Data • Ped Clearances • Bike Timing • Collision Review Interim Deliverable14 Signal Grouping Project Evaluation of Cycle Lengths Evaluation Grouping&Cycle Length Deliverables • Recommended + Development • Split Analysis Timing Cycle Length Analysis Team Meeting • Offset Analysis Memorandum Timing PDT Optimization Meeting Deliverable Implementation Progress After Deliverables • Develop Timing &Fine-tuning Meeting Study • Final Report Sheets • Final Timing Sheets • Final Model focuses on the JMD management team and the Management Plan consultants working on the projects to achieve the Our management philosophy is grounded on achieving desired project objectives.The latter two consist of using our clients' goals successfully by effectively managing appropriate project controls to effectively manage the the key contributors to project success, namely, people, project deliverables, schedule and budget. A typical project and quality. Our philosophy is thus defined in our project would be managed in accordance with each company Management Plan, a plan consisting of three component to meet the City's objectives in a timely primary components, namely, People Management, manner. Each one of these components is briefly Project Management,and Quality Management.The first discussed below. PEOPLE MANAGEMENT People management consists of JMD team leadership :_, and consultant oversight through effective planning, ` ' staffing, and communication as discussed below. Planning ManagementAfter our kickoff meeting with the City, we will hold an (------ Approach (----- internal team meeting to discuss the project's objectives, milestones, staffing needs, schedule, and task Project Quality responsibilities. Our goal will be to establish a realistic plan to meet all program requirements. JMD p.1-8 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I.Approach and Scope of Work Staffing Project Management The JMD Team is committed to delivering quality and For the project development work, we propose to use a timely services within the City's time and budget goals. Project Management and Control System that we have We have added multiple groups of professionals to work used successfully on similar transportation infrastructure as squads and manage multiple projects conveniently. In projects. The monitoring and controlling of schedules addition, we have provided sufficient resource capacity and budgets will provide a means to ensure that the to perform the projects or tasks in a timely manner, and proposed work plan is implemented effectively in an confirm that the key personnel proposed for the program efficient and timely manner. JMD understands the and the individual projects will be available for the requirements of Metro funded projects, worked with duration of the program. Currently, our work level is Metro and the City on the development of 710 funded estimated at approximately 70 percent of capacity and projects, and is prepared to assist City staff with any declines to 40 percent over the anticipated life of this documentation necessary for project reporting. project. Mr. Marciuska, our proposed Project Manager, is available over 70 percent of his time during the next The core of JMD's system is a monthly Project 12 months as shown below. During our internal team Management Report comprised of two sections: meeting, we will prepare a team staffing plan to ensure the right people are available at the right time for each program and project task. • Status Report - Arranged by task, this report discusses budget and schedule; issues which need Key Team Member Availability to be resolved; coordination required between the (%) project team,the client staff and other agencies;and Algis Marciuska, MBA, PE 70% actual versus planned progress. Juan M. Diaz, MBA, PE 40% Peter Kim, PE, TE, PTOE 50% • Project Control Report- This is a computerized Steven Itagaki, PE, TE, PTOE 50% report which tracks budget and schedule and is refined and customized to meet the specific project Ivan Salvatierra, PE, TE 50% needs. This report is issued monthly and can easily Lan Saadatenjadi, PE 60% be produced more often, if required, for more Frank Sanchez, PE 50% frequent project control. Communication It is critical that the project management system be The Project Manager will work closely with the flexible and able to accommodate scheduling consultants and the JMD in accordance with the project adjustments that may occur.Our management system is tailored towards this program's specific needs and can requirements. Under the current Covid-19 conditions, communication will be through the use of video be adjusted if needed. In the event of a schedule shift, a conferencing,phone calls,and e-mails.The project team recovery plan will be developed and implemented to will continually discuss project issues, progress and either meet the original milestone dates or other dates reviews on a periodic basis to meet each project mutually agreed to by the City and JMD. The schedule milestone.The ultimate objective is to lead our team and will provide a tool with which the Project Manager can the various project consultants to the desired objectives closely monitor the scheduled timing of each task and through effective and timely communication, permit overall management control of the project. Our Project Manager's experience with the City confirms that the best way to minimize delays and address unforeseen problems is to proactively communicate with the City's Public Works Director to alert him of potential issues. Our Agency Advisor/Liaison will ensure that City staff is not overburdened with project task requests. Our project manager will ensure proper communication and documentation through meetings, email and telephone conversation minutes for project record. JMD p.1-9 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) I.Approach and Scope of Work Project Scope, Schedule and Cost Our approach is to translate the scope of services into a Control definable work breakdown structure (WBS). The WBS The monitoring and controlling is then sequenced using a precedence format,which can of project scope, schedule and be exhibited as a simple bar chart or a sophisticated 11 cost will provide a means to 1 Critical Path Method (CPM) flow chart. Several ensure that the proposed sophisticated software aids such as Microsoft Project program is implemented in an '1 w P0 Planner can be used to standardize the schedule format efficient and timely manner ' and facilitate updates. Initially, the scope of work will be as all-encompassing as The agreed upon schedules will be used to show possible to cover all reasonable scenarios. After expectations for resource allocations, milestones and confirmation of agreements with Metro and project review periods. The schedule and any updates will be timelines, then the scope can be tailored to the specific communicated to all affected stakeholders so those needs of the overall program and the individual projects critical path elements are understood. It is essential that in consultation with the City's Public Works Director. the consultants be involved in the scheduling effort, so Anticipated exclusions and items to be provided by the that the consultant"owns"the schedule and is committed City will be defined, reviewed and discussed. to delivering the project on time. Control of scope, schedule and cost will be achieved Control of the project schedule is the Project Manager's using the following Project Management Control System responsibility. Once the time phased logic has been that JMD managers are using successfully on similar prepared and accepted,the Project Manager will monitor engineering services projects.The core of this system is progress against the time baseline. Projects are a monthly Project Management Information System dynamic and unforeseen circumstances can insert comprised of the following three elements: delays. The ability of our Project Manager to anticipate probable delays and mitigate them will benefit the City SCHEDULE by providing quality projects ready for construction in optimum time. The schedule summarizes the Project Team's understanding of the scope of work, resource allocation Figures 4 through 6 illustrate the anticipated project and project approach. Developing and controlling the schedule for an Interchange Project and for an Adaptive schedule is critical to the project's success and is a Signal/Traffic Signal Coordination Project. primary factor in evaluating overall project performance. An overall program schedule and schedules for each project will be developed. Figure 4—Project Schedule—Combined Projects PROJECTS YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 Interchange 1 Study/Prelim/Env. ROW Final PS&E Construction Adaptive/TS 1 Design/Construction Adaptive/TS 2 Design/Construction Interchange 2 Study/Prelim/Env. ROW Final PS&E Construction . JMD p.1-10 Figure 5—Sample Adaptive Signals Project Schedule Project Management Related Services to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects(RFP No.2020-11) Sample Adaptive Signal/Traffic Signal Coordination Project City of Rosemead January 14,2021 ID Task Task Name Duration Start Finish Qtr 1 2021 tr 2 2021 Qtr 3,1021 —_ Qtr 4,._2021 qtr_1,22x022 Qtr 2,2 0 Mode Jan l Feb 1 Mar A0-__I May 1 Jun Jul ( Aug_ISep Oct .I Nov1 Dec Jan ` Feb Mar Apr 1 Task 0-Project Management 284 days Mon 2/22/21 Thu 3/24/22 . a 2 a Task 1-Analysis of Existing Conditions,Reports and Plans-Preliminary Engineering 30 days Mon 2/22/21 Fri 4/2/21 ...........,. 3 a Task 1.01-Existing Records Research 30 days Mon 2/22/21 Fri 4/2/21 11.1110-1 4 a Task 1.02-Field Inventory 30 days Mon 2/22/21 Fri 4/2/21 5 a Task 1.03-Traffic Data 30 days Mon 2/22/21 Fri 4/2/21 6 a Task 1.04-Utility/Substructure Investigation and Coordination 30 days Mon 2/22/21 Fri 4/2/21 7 a Task 2-Preliminary Design Concepts 20 days Mon 3/8/21 Fri 4/2/21 8 a Task 2.01-System Study,Analysis and Recommendations 20 days Mon 3/8/21 Fri 4/2/21 9 a Agency Review 5 days Mon 4/5/21 Fri 4/9/21 10 a Task 3-Final Construction Plans and Specifications Document 54 days Mon 3/22/21 Thu 6/3/21 I • 11 a Task 3.01-Base Plans 20 days Mon 3/22/21 Fri 4/16/21 12 a Task 3.02-Design Plans 30 days Mon 4/12/21 Fri 5/21/21 T -i 13 a Task 3.03-Specifications 20 days Fri 4/30/21 Thu 5/27/21 14 I at Task 3.04-Cost Estimate 20 days Fri 5/7/21 Thu 6/3/21 15 a Agency Review 210 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 3/24/22 • 16 a Task 3.05-Traffic Management Center 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 17 IS Task 3.06-System Integration IP Addressing 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 18 a Task 3.07-System Integration-Fiber Assignments 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 19 a Task 3.08-Signal Synchronization 210 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 3/24/22 • 20 a Task 3.08.01-Field Observation 10 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 6/17/21 IM 21 IS Task 3.08.02-Before Study 10 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 6/17/21 22 a Task 3.08.03-Develop Synchro Model 10 days Fri 6/18/21 Thu 7/1/21 23 a Task 3.08.04-Signal Timing Parameters 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 24 a Task 3.08.05-Discussion of Signal Timing Objectives 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 III -2-5—J a Task 3.08.06-Refinement of Signal Timing Parameters 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 26 a Task 3.08.07-Signal Groups and Proposed Cycle Lengths 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 - 27 a Task 3.08.08-Optimize Synchro Model 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 28_ a Task 3.08.09-Agency Review and Approval 5 days Fri 6/25/21 Thu 7/1/21 ___ 29 a Task 3.08.10-Timing Sheets 25 days Fri 6/4/21 Thu 7/8/21 30 a Task 3.08.11-After Study 25 days Fri 2/18/22 Thu 3/24/22 31 a Task 3.08.12-Final Report 25 days Fri 2/18/22 Thu 3/24/22 room 32 a Agency Review and Approval 10 days Fri 7/9/21 Thu 7/22/21 33 a Task 4-Construction Support 150 days Fri 7/23/21 Thu 2/17/22 i 34 a Task 4.01-Bid Support 40 days Fri 7/23/21 Thu 9/16/21 35 IS Task 4.02-Construction Support 90 days Fri 9/17/21 Thu 1/20/22 36IIIII-I a Task 4.03-Implementation of Timing Plans 20 days Fri 12/24/21 Thu 1/20/22 l 37 a Task 4.04-Fine Tuning of Timing 20 days Fri 1/21/22 Thu 2/17/22 ion- 38 a Task 4.05-Prepare Record Drawings 10 days Fri 1/21/22 Thu 2/3/22 i Task 11111111 Project Summary VV" """NO Inactive Milestone <, Manual Summary Rollup Deadline 4, Project:Schedule Split External Tasks orrommoriormomorrog Inactive Summary -r) Manual Summary •1 Progress Date:Wed 1/13/21 Milestone ♦ External Milestone 4 Manual Task Start-only C Summary •• Inactive Task .............! Duration-only -„ Finish-only 3 Page 1 Figure 6-Sample Interchange Project Schedule Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects(RFP No.2020-11) Sample Interchange Project City of Rosemead January 14,2021 10 Wa.S Task Name I Duration 1 Start 1 Finish 1 2021 1 2022 2023 2024 Jun 2023 Ot 4 2023 U 2024 , Ora 2024 0r 3,2024 pro 202 ; Jul Stst Seta Od Nov,Dec Jan Feb Apr May Ju .1 Se Oct Nov Dec n Feb rAa; A Mav^Jun Jai Sop Sep OctNov Feb Mer Am May Jun Jul Aug•Sep,Oct Nov'; 1 160 1.0 Project Management 942 dexo Mon v2vz1 ne mnrz4 • �� I LK 1,zpzl Qtr z 202 Qtr a map Gtr 4,eon Qtr 1 2022 o z�az2 0 e 2z o o G zoz D 0.3 M AugAuq Dee J F_b Mar Apr May 2"150.00.1 NTP 1 day Mon 2/22121 Mon 2/2221 _._. _.. 3 150.00.2 Work Plan 20 days Tue 2/23/21 Mon 302/21 1 , : 4_050.00.5 Administration Coordination,Progress Reports Invoices Ra/Fiang 941 days nue 223121 Tue 10/1/24__ � v., $}�- '?m� .„ .'yg -szr�^_••.^✓--.v. +a¢s5-. - 5 1150.00.8 Project Meetings(Kickoff.PDT Technical Focus Third Pany) 941 days Tue 2/2321 The 10/124 --' 't.$'7•'•aa• `. •••`•i5`- -'�' -r 8 1150.00.10 2.0 Coordination 941 darn Tue 2/23121 Tue 10/121 �' t.,. -. &&i ':' -'63,2WElEiMMMIIMMOIMINEM 7 ' Mal160.00.16 3.0 Assemble Existing Information and Resource Material 7o days Toe 22321 Mon 621021 8 150.00.20 3.1 Prepare Analysis a.Summary 30 days Tue 2/2301 Mon 45/21 'I • 9 15000.25 32 Prepare Draft and Final Report Existing Transportation Projects 40 days Tue 4/6/21 Mon 5/3101 10 tso.o6 4.0 Preparation of Project Initiation Document(PID/PSR-PDS) 75 days Tue 4/601 Mon 7/1621 IN 11 115005.05 4.1 Form the Project Development Team 30 days Tue 4/6/21 Mon 5/17/21 _ 12 150.05.10 4.2 Develop Purpose and Need 15 days Tue 5/1601 Mon 2721 I _..�__. 13)150.05.15 4.3 Review the Project See 10 days Tue 6/601 Men 6212/ "r. T4 1150.05.20 49 Additional Data orringPtion Requirements 20 days Tue 6/22/21 Mon7/1921 tL� • -__.. , 15-115006.25 5.0 Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment(TEPA) so days Tue 21/21 Mon 80301 • "s_r 1V:160.06.30 6.0 Local Intersection Options Analysis 90 days Tue is Men 100121 i • 17-1150.0535 61 Local Intersection Control Evaluation 20 den Tue 81221 Mon 71311 t 16-1150.05.40 6.2 Additional Arterial Highway Analysis 60 days Tue]/221 Mon 92721 ! I _..._- _-_ ter. _. _-.._ -.... _........ __...._ 19 1150.05.45 6.3 Additional Interchange Geometry Mans 90 days Tue 2821 Mon 10/1121 20 060.10.05 7.0 Initial Engineering Analysis&Update Alternatives 56 drys r19.010021 Mon 10/4/21 6� • 21 150.10.10 7.1 Deficiencies Analyss 20 den Tue 72021 Mon 21601 _.-........ _._....._ . .. 22 150.10.15 72 Design Standards and Analysis 20 days Tue 7/2021 Mon 21621 1 23 '150.10.20 7.3 Structure Study/Estimates 30 days Tue 52421 Mon 10/421 _ 241150.10.25 7.4 Alternative ease Maps 30 days Tue 504/21 Mon 124/21 -, 25 150.1020 8.0 Geometric Development/Plans se a.rs Tue en921 Mon 11/1621 _- 28 1150.10.35 6.1 Full Standard Geometric Mans 50 days Tue 6/24/21 Mon 11/1521 r _27 1150.10.40 8.2 Non Sdndard Geometric Plans 40 days Turf 8/2421 Mon 10/10/211 28 150.10.45 8.3 Hybrid Geometric Plans 20 days Tue 10/18111 Mont 1/1221; • 2a 11so.t0.so 9.0 Risk Assessment&Constructability Analysis 40 days Tue 11/1621 Mon 1007/2; - _ 30 150.10.55. 9.1 Risk Assessment 30 days Tue t1/1221 Mon 122721 , �._ 31 150.10.60 9.2 Construcbbdiry Analysis 40 days Tue 11/1221 Mon 1/1222 - _--�- T 32 160.15 10.0. Alternatives Evaluation SO days Tue1106/21 Mon 2/722, - 1 j 33..11150.15.05 10.1 Rasourns to Complete PA/ED 45 days Tue 11/120 Mon 1/1722( MNI i 71 :150.1510 102 Constraints Analysis 60 days Tue 11/16121 Mon 2222E ,, 35_150.15.15 10.3 Alternative Safety Impact Analysis 45 days Tue 11/1621 Mon 1/17221 36 1150.15.20 104 Phasing Analysts 60 days Two 11/1221 Mon 22221 37 160.1636 e0 tlrys Tue 11/1621 Mon M122 - - 4 --- - 1 11.0 Stormwater and Right of Way 58....:150.15.30 11.1 Wormaater Analysis(sw0R) 30 days Tue 11/1221 Mon 122721 _y_ _. , • 39 1150.15.35 112 Right of Wee Impact Analysis 60 days Tue 1226/21 Mon 32122 ` l= 40 116020.10 12.0 Environmental Assessment 60 days Tue 11/1621 Mon 2/7221 : 1 -4- 1-15020.20 Initial Site Assessment 45 days Tue 11/16/21 Mon 1/17221 -- 1- 92 715020.30 Water Quality Compliance(SNAP) 45 days Tue 11/1221 Men 1/17/221 43 1150.20.40 Preliminary Environmental Anajysis Report(PEAR) 60 days Tue 11/1621 Mon 2/7221 '- =,,;,I+ a -r �- • 44 1611.26.06 13.0 Project Development Assessment 150 days Tue 10/5/21 Mon 52/22 4 45 1150.25.10 13.1 Develop Cost Estimates 30 days Tue 2/ 2 Mon 32122 671 46 150.25.15 13.2 Funding 30 days Tue 3/2222 Mon 5/222... <] _ _,,, _I150.25.20 13.3 Develop Srlredub 30 days Tue 3/22/22 Mon 5222/ 48 150.2525 13.4 Risk Analysis 30 tlaye Tue 11/1601 Mon 1227211 . : '19 1150.25.30 13.5 Value Analysis 60 days Tue 10/5/21 Mon 122721 +m-r--;-=: 50 1160.26.x6 14.0 Complete PID(PSR-PDS)Report etc days Tue 3/23.01 Mon 513002 -.. 1 1 1 . 1 -5 :150.25.40 14.1 FHWA Coordination 90 days Tue 11/1221 Mon 32122 • • 52 150.25.45 14.2 Duality Management 310 days Tue 30301 Mon 5/30/22 : _ i ___ 53 150 26.60 14.3 Prepare Pie(PSR-PDS/Approvals) 80 days Tue 2222 Mon 62022 ♦ - 54 1150.2555 14.3a Draft PSR-POS 40 days Tue 2/8/22 Mon 4/422 55 115025.60 1935 Flnel PSR-PDS 40 days The 4/5/22 Mon 52022 56 1150.26.66 15.0 Environmental Process/Clearance 200 days Tue}222 Men 120222 ♦ / 57 1150.25.70 151 Ennronnental Documentation 200 days Tue 38/22 Mon 12/12/12 _- -- , 58 1160.25.76 16,0 Right of Way Acquisition 200 days Tue 62022 Mon 82623 59 1150.25.50 18.1 Right of Way Acquisition 200 days Tue 9/20/22 Mon 8/25/23/ ' -, 60 ,160.30.20 17.0 Plans,Specifications and Estimate 270 days Tue 4/423 Mon 4n624l • 1 • 1♦ 61 150.30.30 17.1 Preliminary 4 Eng neer ng(35%) 80 days Tue 423 Mon 70.31 - -- - • -- 1 62 150.3035 17.2 75%PSSE 70 days Tue]2523 Mon 10130.2} i ...-._r� 63 150.30.40 17.3100%POSE 60 darn Tue 1013123 Mon 12224 64 150.30.45 17.4 AdveMsing/sidding 60 days Tue 12304 Mon 415/24 •: _ 65 160.30.60 1e.0 Construction 10 days Tue G1824 Tue 10/1/241 _.. -.... _ ._. -._ 88 150.30.55 18.1 Pre-Construction 1 day Tue 41624 Tue 4122 , r : 67 15030.50 182 16.2 Construct. 100 days Wad 4/1724 Tue&3241 ,a..,<. 68 150.30.65 160/Pundlest 10 days Wed 9/4/24 Tue 2172 _ W 150.30.70 19.4 Project Closeout 100, Wed 9/1224 Tue 10//24' -__ ; _. _.._._._. .-._..- .-_ Wad 1/13/21 Page 1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Section II Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes ®i . JMD Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) II. Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes { keet .bur , ..., A M „ ., it .. .... , ,. ,,_,., , wir Key Personnel Organization and Qualifications 1 tie are ready to The JMD Team offers a comprehensive mix of management insight and multidiscipline technical expertise to successfully anticipate and handle the various e iver needs of the City's program. Management insight and technical expertise are assured by our Project Manager who has a management and civil engineering degrees to cover all aspects of the program. In addition, our Project Manager has the municipal background,from the City of San Gabriel and County of San Bernardino,to understand the municipal process and ensure that pitfalls are avoided. Finally,our Project Manager and Project Advisor have the project history working with LA Metro, representing the City of San Gabriel and working with members of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments(SGVCOG) to identify important projects needed to address traffic impacts associated with the lack of a 4 to 5-mile freeway gap. The JMD team, illustrated in the organizational chart located in Figure 3 on the following page,consists of a"team of local experts" to handle project needs in a strategic manner. Unlike others who offer an army of people, which are neither experts nor local,the JMD Team is built on the notion of offering our best talent to ensure the City receives the optimal value. In addition, our staff, many who live in the San Gabriel Valley(near Rosemead), are highly committed and available to assist the City and this program without interruption from start-up to completion. Meet the Project Manager Highlights: Assigned to this important project is one of • Over 35 Years Traffic Engineering o'°; our most qualified, experienced, diverse Experience and local Project Managers, Algis J. • Represented the City of San Gabriel on Marciuska, MBA, PE, a licensed Civil the SR-710 North Study Engineer registered in the State of • Extensive Multi-Discipline Experience lilt California, with over 35 years of • Experience with Various Local Agencies transportation and municipal experience • Familiar with City Procedures with expertise in highways, civil, traffic and municipal engineering. He has served as Project Manager for SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements for the City of San Gabriel where he oversaw the definition and development in the SR-710 North Study of various projects including highway interchanges, arterials, "hot spot" intersections and coordinated or adaptive traffic signals. . . MCP p.11-1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) II. Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes With his extensive local background and municipal experience, Mr. Marciuska is an ideal choice as Project Manager to lead this important project. He can be reached at (626) 820-1137 extension 1212, or via email at amarciuska@jmdiaz.com. To ensure uninterrupted service to the City, our Principal/Technical Advisor, Juan M. Diaz, MBA, PE, who led the development of the SR-710 North Study for Metro, will be ready to serve as alternate Project Manager should the need arise. JMD TEAM BRINGS THE CITY: • Project Delivery — Project history and state of the art ". Key Personnel Organization solutions to start running for timely delivery to benefit all parties. The JMD team organization of the • Constructability—A Team with a record of minimal to no proposed personnel is illustrated in Figure 7 change orders. below, followed by the JMD team roles and availability matrix listed in Table 1 on the • Comprehensive Service -A turnkey strategy focused on following page. JMD's Project Manager and project delivery while assisting City staff with Metro reporting. Key Personnel are committed and available to • Innovation and Value—An innovative, cost effective and serve on the project from start-up to completion. responsive approach Figure 7—Organizational Chart O1� OSE EAD Value AnalysislEngineering*** Jack Shah,AIA,MS Civil Principal-In-Charge/ Project Manager QA/QC Manager*** Technical Advisor Juan M.Diaz,MBA,PE Algis J.Marciuska,MBA,PE Peter Kim,PE,TE,PTOE Project Controls/Reporting Document Control Michael F.Chavez,MBV Darlene Dominguez Highways Traffic Signals and Lighting* ITS Infrastructure Lan Saadatenjadi,PE Steven Itagaki,PE,TE,PTOE Ivan Salvatierra,PE,TE Isaias Pedroza,EIT Winston Bautista,PE,TE,PTOE Dana Dardoon Gilberto Figueroa,EIT Greg Andrade Daniel Hosseini Maria Flores Chapman Lee,EIT Constructability*** Plan CheckinglCost Estimating Construction Management Frank Sanchez,PE Deepak Solanki Frank Sanchez,PE * Traffic Counts by NDS Construction Inspector*** ** Key Personnel in Bold ***Optional Service James Greenfield 41 II JMD p.11-2 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) II. Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes JMD Team Availability Table 1 below lists the JMD team's current workload and time available to assist the City with this important project. Resumes for all Key Personnel are located at the end of this section. Table 1—Current Workload and Availability PERSONNEL/PROJECT ROLE I CURRENT WORKLOAD AVAILABILITY Key Personnel Algis J.Marciuska,MBA, PE • Glendora On-Call Engineering,City of Glendora(10%) 70% Project Manager • Silent Ranch Tract Development,City of Glendora(10%) Juan M.Diaz,MBA,PE • Alameda Street,City of Los Angeles(20%) 60% Principal-in-Charge/ • On-Call Engineering Services,City of Glendora(5%) Technical Advisor • Administrative and Marketing(15%) Peter Kim,PE,TE,PTOE • On-Call Engineering Services,Various Cities((20%) 60% QA/QC Manager • Administrative and Marketing(20%) Steven Itagaki,PE,TE,PTOE • Anaheim Dilemma Zones, City of Anaheim(15%) 70% Traffic Signals and Lighting • Newport Beach Streetlight Improvements(5%) • Arroyo Seco Low Flow Water Line,LABOE(10%) Ivan Salvatierra,PE,TE • Metro Purple Line Extension,LA Metro(10%) 70% ITS Infrastructure • Norwalk Local Streets Rehabilitation(10%) • Magnolia Avenue Grade Crossing,City of Corona(10%) Lan Saadatenjadi,PE • Miscellaneous Projects 70% Highways • Administrative and Marketing Frank Sanchez,PE • Norwalk Local Streets Rehabilitation(50%) 50% Construction Management/Constructability Technical Staff Deepak Solanki • Glendora On Call Engineering Services(25%) 50% • Brea On Call Engineering Services(25%) James Greenfield • Norwalk Local Streets Rehabilitation(50%) 50% Winston Bautista,PE,TE, PTOE • Miscellaneous On-Call Projects(40%) 60% Darlene Dominguez • Document/Project Control,City of Glendora(20%) 80% Greg Andrade • Anaheim Dilemma Zones,City of Anaheim(15%) 70% • Newport Beach Streetlight Improvements(5%) • Arroyo Seco Low Flow Water Line,LABOE(10%) Dana Dardoon • Metro Purple Line Extension,LA Metro(10%) 70% • Norwalk Local Streets Rehabilitation(10%) • Magnolia Avenue Grade Crossing,City of Corona(10%) Maria Flores • Anaheim Dilemma Zones,City of Anaheim(15%) 70% • Newport Beach Streetlight Improvements(5%) • Arroyo Seco Low Flow Water Line,LABOE(10%) ■ ■ JMD p.11-3 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) IL Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes Table 1—Current Workload and Availability PERSONNEL/PROJECT ROLE CURRENT WORKLOAD AVAILABILITY Chapman Lee,EIT • Staff Augmentation, City of Glendora(30%) 70% Isaias Pedroza, EIT • Staff Augmentation, City of Glendora(30%) 70% Gilberto Figueroa, EIT • Staff Augmentation, City of Glendora(30%) 70% Daniel Hosseini • Staff Augmentation, City of Glendora(30%) 70% ■ ■ %J M D p.11-4 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Juan M. Diaz, MBA, PE : I JMD Principal-In-Charge/Technical Advisor Mr. Diaz has over 35 years of professional engineering experience in the transportation planning and engineering industry. His extensive expertise in all highway,traffic, rail and transit engineering has resulted in his management of major highway and rail transit projects in Southern California. Mr. Diaz It-,44, has conducted studies and prepared designs for numerous agencies including Caltrans, Metro, SCRRA, OCTA, CPUC, NDOT, County of Los Angeles, County of Orange, and numerous local agencies as well as local railroads throughout California and Nevada. His experience includes the f.f analysis and development of PS&E packages for highway, rail transit and freight rail corridor projects. As a former Metrolink representative and on-call railroad consultant, his experience in coordination with the CPUC has led to more than 500 at-grade crossing and grade separations within the Metrolink systems. His diverse Title background and experience along with his strong ability in leading President/Chief Executive Officer community outreach/consensus building efforts has resulted in his direct involvement in the analysis of train/vehicle/pedestrian circulation issues at Years of Experience rail/highway interfaces including interchanges,grade crossings and stations 35 as well as quality of life projects associated with mitigating noise along rail corridors. Registration Mr. Diaz is a Cal Poly Pomona faculty as well as youth minister/preacher Registered Professional Engineer, CA, known for his ability to work and communicate with bilingual communities of #C50813 all ages on sensitive projects. Education Relevant Experience • M.B.A., Business Administration, 1991,California State Polytechnic SR-710 Gap Alternatives—LA Metro University, Pomona Served as Task Manager and member of the CH2M Team responsible for B.S., Civil Engineering, 1986 alternatives analyses, technical assessments, conceptual and preliminary • California State Polytechnic engineering, public involvement and community outreach support, and University, Pomona environmental studies to prepare a project report and appropriate environmental documents for the SR 710 Gap. The 710 Gap is a regionally • A.S., Building Technology, 1982 significant project needed to close the current highway system gap between Don Bosco Technical Institute, Interstates 10 and 210 in Los Angeles and Pasadena, California, Rosemead respectively. JMD has developed various alternatives including Affiliations Transportation Systems Management/Transportation Demand • American Society of Civil Management(TSM/TDM), a nearly 7-mile light rail transit(LRT) line, a 10- Engineers mile bus rapid transit(BRT) line and interchange improvements. JMD was Institute of Transportation responsible for designing arterial segments, interchanges, LRT and BRT • alignments and stations as well as "hot spot" intersections, roundabouts, • American Railway Engineering parking and LRT maintenance facilities. and Maintenance of Way Association SR-91/I.710 PSR/PDS Support—LA Metro Served as Project Manager responsible for preparing the PSR-PDS for widening improvements on SR-91 between Central Avenue in the City of Compton and Paramount Boulevard, in the City of Long Beach, a distance of about 5.5 miles.The project proposed the addition of one general purpose ■. JNID J. Diaz 1 p. 1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) lane in each direction for two 1-710 alternatives 5C(10 general purpose lanes) and 7(8 general purpose lanes with a four-lane elevated freight corridor). The project analyzed four alternatives designed to address capacity, weaving and merging issues within the freeway mainline as well as interchange capacity and operation needs.The project included consideration of an Eastbound collector-distributor road designed to separate multiple ramps from the mainline and allows for optimal spacing. On-Call Project Management, Staff Augmentation and Municipal Engineering Services—City of San Gabriel Serving as Principal-In-Charge responsible for providing on-call traffic engineering services to the City of San Gabriel. Services included study reviews, plan reviews, special investigations, and studies as well as traffic signal and stop control warrant analysis. JMD also reviewed traffic signal, traffic control and street lighting plans, and also performed special investigations or studies related to safe route to schools including lighting assessments. Citywide Analysis and High Priority SR-710 North Mitigation Projects—City of San Gabriel Served as Project Manager responsible for developing citywide level of service, ridership,cost, and priority analysis to define necessary mitigation projects in lieu of a missing SR-710 Gap highway connection between 1-10 and 1-210 in the City of San Gabriel. The project, originated by Metro, was designed to define capacity needs through 2045 within the City directly or indirectly attributed to the missing SR-710 Gap with the intent of improving safety and mobility for local and regional traffic.The following are the projects resulting from this project: • Mission Road &Ramona Street • Adaptive Signal Control Technology Systems on • San Gabriel Boulevard/Interstate 10(SG-13) Valley Blvd &San Gabriel Blvd (SG-14) • Valley Boulevard &Abbot Avenue • San Gabriel Boulevard &Valley Boulevard • Walnut Grove Avenue&Las Tunas Drive(SG-5) • San Gabriel Boulevard & Marshall Street • Del Mar Avenue/Mission Road/EI Monte Street Realignment(SG-11) Reconfiguration(SG-12) • Valley Boulevard &Del Mar Avenue • Transit Service to Light Rail(SG-7) • San Gabriel Boulevard&Las Tunas Drive • Mission Road &Junipero Serra Drive • First-Mile/Last Mile Improvements(SG-8) • Del Mar Avenue/Interstate 10(SG-13) • Walnut Grove Avenue&Grand Avenue(SG-5) • New Avenue/Interstate 10(SG-13) • East Broadway Street (San Gabriel Boulevard to • Local Circulator Bus Service(SG-9) Muscatel Avenue)(SG-3) • Valley Boulevard &New Avenue • Multimodal Transit Center(SG-6) • Mission Drive& Las Tunas Drive • Citywide Bicycle Facilities(SG-4) San Gabriel Trench Grade Separation Project—City of San Gabriel Served as Task Manager involved in providing analysis and design for the Transportation Management Plan for the San Gabriel Trench project in the City of San Gabriel near the historic San Gabriel Mission and adjacent vital Mission District, the San Gabriel High School, and numerous residential properties adjacent to the existing rail right-of-way. The analysis included level of service analysis as well as development of haul routes to minimize impacts to local residents and businesses.The trench project substantially reduced operating noise through the elimination of crossing warning horn blasts and signal equipment, (as well as redirecting the noise upward rather than outward). This project included railroad coordination,drainage, utility relocation, and traffic control. 2013-2014 Great Streets Improvement Project—City of San Gabriel Served as Principal-In-Charge responsible for overseeing design and construction inspection services to the City of San Gabriel for various high priority rehabilitation projects citywide. The proposed streets for rehabilitation include: Fairview Avenue, North Circle Drive, South Circle Drive, Abbot Avenue, W. Chestnut Avenue, Alley (North), Alley (South), Bradbury Drive, N. Mission Drive and W. Sycamore Drive. Sepulveda Boulevard PEER and Metro CFP Served as Project Manager responsible for developing corridor improvements including intersection widening, signalization (adaptive signals) and progression improvements at seven (7) intersections along or near Sepulveda Boulevard as part of Metro's Measure R Program managed through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG). The project consisted of conducting traffic analysis, preparing conceptual design of intersection ■i JMD J. Diaz l p. 2 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) improvements,and conceptual level cost estimates.The project also included the development of a Permit Engineering Evaluation Report(PEER)and a funding application as part of Metro's 2015 Call for Projects funding program. On-Call/Staff Augmentation Municipal Engineering Services—City of Industry Served as Technical Advisor responsible for providing City engineering services to the City of Industry including permitting, plan checking and inspection as well as preparation of studies and design plans for roadway,traffic signal, railroad crossing and rail/highway grade separation projects.These projects/tasks included the following: • Citywide Traffic Model and CIP Program • Puente Avenue Grade Separation Development • Citywide Blvd Bus Stop Removal — Various • Citywide Traffic Accident Analysis Locations • Traffic Management Center Development • Citywide Signing and Striping Maintenance • Azusa Avenue Citywide Corridor Improvements • Retroreflective Sign Inspection Study • San Jose Ave.Widening • Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Study • Colima Road (Puente Hills Mall)Widening • Baker Parkway Traffic Calming • Gale Ave./Stoner Creek Traffic Signal Timing • Stoner Creek ADA Enhancements Optimization • Valley Blvd/I-605 Interchange • Metro Grade Crossing Program • SR-60/1605 Interchange • Fairway Drive Grade Separation • Citywide Permits and Construction Inspections Countywide ITS Inventory—LA Metro Served as Principal-In-Charge responsible for conducting an inventory of existing ITS equipment located in traffic signal cabinets within thirty (30) cities in the Los Angeles County. Data was used to create a data base to assist Metro and local cities for assessment of future improvements. Coordination with over forty (40) cities was essential during the project to ensure Metro's database was an accurate representation of the existing ITS network. Tasks included numerous field visits to traffic signal controllers and conducting an inventory of all equipment located in each traffic signal cabinet. On-Call Engineering Services—City of Glendora Serving as Principal Advisor responsible for providing professional on-call engineering services to the City of Glendora on a task order basis. Services include on-site and offsite services including project management, Foothill Gold Line design review, plan checking as well as street,traffic and utility design and construction inspection. I-5/Burbank Boulevard Interchange—City of Burbank Served as Project Manager responsible for the design to widen the existing 1-5 Freeway off-ramps at Burbank Boulevard necessary to accommodate traffic volumes generated by the 41- acre Media City Center Development project. The project included the preparation of a project study report; project report; and plans, specifications and estimates. ATSAC SMART Corridor Project—City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation(LADOT) Served as Design Engineer responsible for the initial traffic signal design tasks required to incorporate four corridors into the City of Los Angeles' central ATSAC network. The corridors begin in the City of Santa Monica extending to downtown Los Angeles and include the following streets: Olympic Boulevard, Pico Boulevard, Venice Boulevard, and Washington Boulevard. The four corridors involved nearly 100 intersections. R AVID J. Diaz I p. 3 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Algis J. Marciuska, MBA, PE ■ i JMD Project Manager Mr. Marciuska has over 35 years of professional engineering experience in the civil engineering profession. He has extensive experience in the design of streets and highways, drainage systems, bridges, culverts, public works facilities,institutional projects,signalization projects,geometric design,land development projects, subdivision mapping, construction surveys, construction engineering,and project management. He has prepared many plans, specifications, estimates, and studies for the County of San Bernardino, San Gabriel Valley cities, County of Los Angeles, County of Orange, and City of San Diego. Relevant Experience On-Call Engineering Services—City of Glendora Serving Sr. Project Manager currently providing on-site project Title management, site development and transportation plan reviews as well as Senior Civil Engineer monitoring MS4 drainage requirements. Also, providing design support on the current Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project currently in Years of Experience construction within the City of Glendora. This assignment requires 35 coordination with City staff,outside agencies and consultants. Registration SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Projects—City of San Gabriel Served as Principal Engineer responsible for developing and planning City Registered Civil Engineer,CA,#44846 traffic and transportation TSM/TDM projects to receive SR-710 Mobility Education Project funding from Metro. Worked with Metro,City Council and Staff,and neighboring cities to develop scope and estimates for multiple projects. • M.B.A., Business Administration, Attended meetings and conferences to advocate for project funding. 1991,California State Polytechnic Coordinated project submittals for two rounds of funding consideration. University, Pomona B.S., Civil Engineering, 1986 Alameda Corridor East San Gabriel Trench Grade Separation Project 4 California State Polytechnic —City of San Gabriel University, Pomona Served as City Project Engineer responsible for providing planning, environmental review, plan checking, permitting, inspection, construction • A.S., Building Technology, 1982 management and inter-agency coordination for the $300 million project Don Bosco Technical Institute, consisting of four grade separations and a 1.5-mile-long trench in the Union Rosemead Pacific Railroad right of way in the cities of San Gabriel, Alhambra, Affiliations Rosemead and Los Angeles County unincorporated community of East San • Member,American Society of Civil Gabriel. Engineers New Public Works Facility Project—City of San Gabriel • Member, Institute of Served as City Project Engineer responsible for providing planning, Transportation Engineers environmental review, development review, and plan checking for the new • Member,American Public Works Public Works Offices and Yard for San Gabriel. The $14 million project Association included an administration and engineering office, fleet service garage, • Member,Urban Land Institute warehouse,workshops,and vehicle/equipment/storage facilities. • Life Member, Chi Epsilon, National Civil Engineering Honor Society Local Streets Rehabilitation Program — Phase I, Zone 24 & • Life Member,Tau Beta Pi, Miscellaneous Streets—City of Norwalk National Engineering Honor Serving as Lead Drainage/Utilities Engineer currently developing design Society plans, specifications and estimates for the rehabilitation of several i JMD A. Marciuska I p. 1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) residential streets in the City's Zone 2 in the southeastern portion of the City of Norwalk.The project involves developing pavement design strategies as well as designing street rehabilitation improvements including pavement reconstruction and overlays as well as curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveways, curb ramps, street lighting and traffic signal interfaces. Due to the extremely flat conditions of the area,several ponding areas are being eliminated by adjusting street profiles and providing new compacted subgrade where settlement has occurred. Pedestrian and Metrolink Station Improvements—City of Covina Served as Design Engineer responsible for providing professional engineering design services for pedestrian improvements at the Metrolink Station in the City of Covina. Improvements consisted of providing safe access to streets for bicyclists and pedestrians including crosswalks, sidewalks and countdown indicators at traffic signals near the station. Proposed site elements included reconstruction and restriping of the parking lot including landscaping,irrigation and lighting improvements. Station platform lighting enhancements proposed were made to meet current lighting standards and fixtures.Additional beautification elements included decorative paving within a plaza at the station and parking structure entrances as well as decorative fountains, benches and trash receptacles, planter pots throughout the station, flag pole and a variety of shapely and colorful trees and vegetation with decorative lighting. The project involved close coordination with Metrolink and California Public Utilities Commission(CPUC). Cycle 8 State-Legislated Safe Routes to School—City of El Monte Served as Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager responsible for providing plans, specifications and cost estimates (PS&E) and related construction documents for the Cycle 8 State-Legislated Safe Routes to School Improvement Project (SR2S) at various city streets within close proximity to city schools. The project included the design of pedestrian raised crosswalks, flashing stop signs, the construction of sidewalk where none currently exist, high visibility crosswalks, modify driveway approaches, at the various intersections, and the modification of any non- compliant ADA-pedestrian ramps within a restrictive area adjacent to elementary schools. These improvements took place adjacent to eighteen (18) El Monte elementary schools within three(3)school districts. Countywide Transportation Projects—County of San Bernardino Served as the County of San Bernardino's Project Manager and Project Engineer responsible for the development of over twenty-five (25) major transportation projects throughout the County of San Bernardino including roadway, rail crossing, drainage, bike trail and traffic signal projects. Specific projects included the following: • Fort Irwin Road Improvement Project—federally and locally funded 20-mile long roadway safety project serving the U.S.Army National Training Center at Fort Irwin, CA. Managed planning, environmental studies, right of way acquisition, and the preparation of the plans, specification, estimates, funding documents, and regulatory clearances/permits. Planned and led meetings for funding,clearances,coordination,and approvals for the proejct with Federal, State, and local agencies and officials. • Arrow at Redwood Signal and Sidewalk Improvement Project—federally and locally funded signalization project at Redwood Elementary School, including sidewalk, curb, gutter, and pavement construction for a safe route to school, City of Fontana. • La Cadena Drive Signal Installation Project —construction of signalization, intersection improvements, signing, and striping of the skewed La Cadena Drive at Barton Road intersection in the cities of Colton and Grand Terrace. • Mission Boulevard at Roswell Signal Upgrade Project — federally funded project to install an upgraded signal system, City of Montclair. • Valley at Hemlock Signal Installation Project—installation of traffic signals at the five-point intersection of Valley Boulevard, Hemlock Avenue, and Fontana Avenue. Jointly funded by the City of Fontana, the County of San Bernardino,and the Federal Highway Administration. • Amboy Road Rehabilitation Project—federally funded pavement rehabilitation and management project, City of Wonder Valley. • Duncan and Wilson Ranch Railroad Crossings—upgrade of two (2) railroad crossings in the Phelan area at the Union Pacific Railroad. Project included the installation of active warning devices,street lighting, roadway paving, and geometric design. ii JIVIQ A. Marciuska I p.2 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Peter Kim, PE, TE, PTOE ; ; JMD QA/QC Advisory Team With over 29 years of civil engineering experience,Mr. Kim completed traffic engineering projects for local agencies, schools, railroads, and private entities in California. His comprehensive experience includes numerous traffic studies, traffic signal designs, preparation of signing & striping, lighting, grading, and traffic control plans. Relevant Experience SR-710 Gap Alternatives—LA Metro Served as QA/QC Manager responsible for the light rail transit, railroad and Transportation System Management/Transportation Demand Management (TSM/TDM), alternatives for the nearly five-mile-long freeway gap between Interstate 10(Los Angeles/Alhambra)and Interstate 210(Pasadena).JMD is responsible for developing conceptual LRT, grade separation, track, Title roadway, and intersection alignments to address local needs and hot spots Traffic Engineer through the Cities of Los Angeles, Alhambra, South Pasadena, and Pasadena. LRT and track alignment plans are designed in accordance with Years of Experience LA Metro, as well as UPRR and AREMA standards, respectively. The cost 29 estimating of each alternative is also involved including the development of an environmental document for the project. JMD was responsible for Registration facilitating close coordination with Cities, UPRR, and CPUC to obtain Registered Civil Engineer,CA,#51616 reviews and the conceptual approvals in a timely manner. Registered Traffic Engineer,CA,#1871 1-710 Freeway EIR/EIS—Los Angeles County Served as QA/QC Manager responsible for providing professional Professional Traffic Operations engineering services in the current development of initial studies and Engineer,CA,#263 preliminary design for the 1-710 Freeway Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)Project in Los Angeles County. Education The 18-mile project, between State Route 60 (Pomona Freeway) and • B.S., Civil Engineering, 1989 Ocean Boulevard in the City of Long Beach proposed to add truck lanes to California State Polytechnic relieve congestion related to increased container activity between the Ports University, Pomona of Los Angeles/Long Beach and the rest of the region.The lead agency for • Certificate for the Management the project was LA County Metro supported by key funding partners for Engineering and Technical including Caltrans, Port of Los Angeles, and Port of Long Beach. Professions, 1999 University of On-Call Traffic Engineering Services Irvine, Irvine Served as Traffic Engineer responsible for providing traffic plan checking Affiliations and general traffic engineering services including reviewing, and • State of California, Board for commenting Developer's master plans,grading plans,traffic impact studies, Professional Engineers and Land traffic signal plans, signing and striping plans, and traffic control plans for Surveyors,Prepared and the following Cities: Reviewed Traffic Registration Examination • On-Call Traffic Engineering Service,City of Irvine—Provided engineering services at the City Hall. • Institute of Transportation • On-Call Traffic Engineering Service, City of Camarillo — Acted as an assistant traffic engineer for the City of Camarillo. • On-Call Traffic Engineering Service, City of Corona— Provided various traffic engineering tasks. JMD P. Kim Ip. 1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) • On-Call Traffic Engineering Service, City of Chino—Provided traffic engineering services. San Gabriel Trench Grade Separation Project—San Gabriel Valley Served as QA/QC Manager responsible for providing professional engineering services with the Alameda Corridor East (ACE), and the City of San Gabriel for the grade separation near the historic San Gabriel Mission and adjacent vital Mission District,the San Gabriel High School, and numerous residential properties adjacent to the existing rail right-of- way. The rail trench will substantially reduce operating noise through the elimination of crossing warning horn blasts and signal equipment, and because the trench walls effectively reflect noise upward rather than outward.This project included, railroad coordination, utility,traffic control, and management planning. Florence Avenue—County of Los Angeles Served as Traffic Engineer responsible for preparing traffic signal modification,and interconnect plans which involved fifty(50) intersections through the Cities of Bell, Bell Gardens, Cudahy, Downey, Huntington Park, Santa Fe Springs, and an unincorporated County Area. Glenoaks Boulevard—County of Los Angeles Served as Traffic Engineer responsible for modifying thirty(30)traffic signal systems throughout the Cities of Burbank and Glendale. Traffic Signal Installation Project for 5 locations—City of Pomona Served as Traffic Engineer responsible for preparing plans,specifications, and cost estimate for the five(5)new traffic signal projects. Traffic Signal Installation on Walnut Avenue—City of Irvine Served as Traffic Engineer responsible for preparing plans, specifications, and cost estimate for the installation of the new traffic signal at the intersection of Walnut and Peters Canyon. The project involved the installation of CCTV equipment,fiber interconnect cables,video detection system, and wireless communication systems. Traffic Control/Signing and Striping Plans—Southern California Served as Traffic Engineer responsible for preparing signing and striping,traffic control,and construction staging plans for over two-hundred(200) projects at various locations throughout Southern California. Cycle 8 State-Legislated Safe Routes to School—City of El Monte Served as Project Engineer responsible for assisting with providing plans, specifications, and cost estimates(PS&E), and related construction documents for the Cycle 8 State-Legislated Safe Routes to School Improvement Project (SR2S) at various City streets within close proximity to City schools. The project included the design of pedestrian raised crosswalks, flashing stop signs, the construction of sidewalk where none existed, high visibility crosswalks, modifying driveway approaches, at the various intersections, and the modification of any non-compliant ADA- pedestrian ramps within a restrictive area adjacent to elementary schools.These improvements took place adjacent to eighteen(18) El Monte elementary schools within three(3)school districts. Pedestrian and Metrolink Station Improvements—City of Covina Served as Design Engineer responsible for professional engineering design services for pedestrian improvements at the Metrolink Station in the City of Covina. The improvements consisted of providing safe access to the streets for bicyclists and pedestrians including crosswalks,sidewalks,and countdown indicators at traffic signals near the station. The proposed site elements included the reconstruction and restriping of the parking lot including landscaping, irrigation,and lighting improvements.The station platform lighting enhancements proposed were made to meet current lighting standards and fixtures. Additional beautification elements included decorative paving within a plaza at the station and parking structure entrances as well as decorative fountains, benches, trash receptacles, planter pots throughout the station, flag pole, and a variety of shapely and colorful trees, and vegetation with decorative lighting. The project involved close coordination with SCRRA/Metrolink and the California Public Utilities Commission(CPUC). •• JMD P. Kim Ip. 2 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Steven Itagaki, PE, , PTOE ■ JMD Traffic Signals and Lighting Mr. Itagaki has over 30 years of civil engineering experience as a Project Manager, Steven has worked on a variety of civil, highway, traffic, rail and transit engineering projects for client cities, outside agencies, private sectors,and California Department of Transportation(Caltrans).Steven has worked on over 20+traffic projects and has been responsible for managing and preparing plans, specifications and estimates for traffic signal, street lighting, signing, striping and traffic control projects utilizing AutoCAD with AutoTurn, MicroStation, and Lighting Programs AG132 and Visual. His experience also includes traffic studies and reports utilizing the Highway Capacity Software(HCS), Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU), Synchro, and SPEEDPLOT. Relevant Experience SR-9111-710 PSR/PDS Support—LA Metro Title Served as Traffic Task Manager responsible for preparing the PSR-PDS for Senior Project Manager widening improvements on SR-91 between Central Avenue in the City of Compton and Paramount Boulevard, in the City of Long Beach, a distance Years of Experience of about 5.5 miles. The project proposed the addition of one (1) general 30 purpose lane in each direction for two(2) 1-710 alternatives 5C(10 general purpose lanes) and seven (8 general purpose lanes with a four-lane Registration elevated freight corridor). The project analyzed four (4) alternatives Registered Professional Engineer, CA, designed to address capacity, weaving, and merging issues within the #C67470 freeway mainline as well as interchange capacity and operation needs.The Registered Traffic Engineer,CA, project included consideration of the Eastbound collector-distributor road #TR2394 designed to separate multiple ramps from the mainline and allows for Registered Professional Traffic optimal spacing. Operations Engineer,CA,#2156 1-710 Gap Alternatives Analysis—LA Metro Education Served as Project Engineer responsible for conducting alternatives B.S.,Civil Engineering, 1991, analysis, technical assessments, modeling, conceptual and preliminary • California State Polytechnic engineering, and Traffic Signal System Priority (TSSP) for the 1-710 Gap University, Pomona Project. The 710 Gap is a regionally significant project needed to close the current highway system gap between Interstates 10 and 210 in Los Angeles Affiliations and Pasadena,California,respectively.JMD assisted in developing a Traffic • American Society of Civil Signal System Priority (TSSP) along Atlantic Boulevard, a nearly five (5) - Engineers mile segment from SR-60 to Huntington Drive. • Institute of Transportation Engineers City Engineering Services—City of Industry Served as City Traffic Engineer responsible for providing City engineering services to the City of Industry.Services included permitting,plan checking, and inspection as well as the preparation of studies and design plans for roadway,traffic signal, railroad crossing, and rail/highway grade separation projects. On-Call/Staff Augmentation Municipal Engineering Services—City of San Gabriel Served as Lead Design Engineer responsible for providing on-call traffic engineering services to the City of San Gabriel. Services included study a JMD S. Itagaki p. 1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) reviews,plan reviews,and special investigations and studies as well as traffic signal and stop control warrant analysis. Reviewing traffic signal,traffic control,and street lighting plans as well as performing special investigations or studies related to safe route to schools including lighting assessments. The following are the projects performed by JMD for the City of San Gabriel: • 237 East Las Tunas Drive Traffic Study Review • 860 East Valley Boulevard TIS • 508 West Las Tunas Drive TIS Review • 704-712 West Las Tunas Drive ITS • 825 East Broadway Dialysis Clinic • 101 East Valley Boulevard TIS • 420 East Valley Boulevard SS&TS Plan Review • 810 East Valley Mixed Use TIS Review • 330 East Las Tunas Drive Medical Office • 600 South San Gabriel Boulevard TIS • 101-111 West Valley Boulevard Hyatt Place • 500 East Valley Boulevard TIS Review • 400-420 West Valley Boulevard TIS • 824 South Gladys Avenue Senior Center TIA 2013-2014 Great Streets Improvement Project—City of San Gabriel Served as Traffic Engineer responsible for traffic design for various high priority projects citywide.The Proposed streets for the rehabilitation included Fairview Avenue, North Circle Drive, South Circle Drive,Abbot Avenue, West Chestnut Avenue, (North),Alley(South), Bradbury Drive, North Mission Drive, and West Sycamore Drive. San Gabriel Trench Grade Separation Project—City of San Gabriel Served as Project Engineer responsible for providing professional engineering services with the Alameda Corridor East (ACE), and the City of San Gabriel,for the grade separation near the historic San Gabriel Mission and adjacent vital Mission District,the San Gabriel High School,and numerous residential properties adjacent to the existing rail right-of- way. The rail trench project substantially reduced operating noise through the elimination of crossing warning horn blasts and signal equipment, (as well as redirecting the noise upward rather than outward). The project included, rail coordination, utility,traffic control,and management planning. Del Mar Avenue Pavement Resurfacing—City of San Gabriel Served as Project Engineer responsible for providing engineering design services for the Del Mar Avenue Pavement Resurfacing Project. This project included design services for roadway overlay improvements on Del Mar Avenue between Norwood Place and Saxon Avenue(1-10 Freeway on ramp). Mission Road Restriping—City of San Gabriel Served as Project Engineer responsible for providing engineering design services to the Mission Road Restriping Project. This project involved preparing preliminary and final signing and striping modification plans for the proposed improvements. In addition, professional design services were provided for bike lane installation improvements on Mission Road, between Junipero Serra Drive and San Gabriel Boulevard. Countywide ITS Inventory—Metro(c/o Iteris) Served as Project Engineer responsible for assisting Metro to adopt and implement the 2009 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), that sets the vision for transportation networks within the County of Los Angeles for the next 30 years. The LRTP focuses on maximizing the arterial system's capacity through technology and an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS). This project focused on establishing an arterial ITS inventory that created a baseline in order to monitor progress of ITS technology development.A comprehensive data collection was performed by JMD to establish the baseline inventory for local cities within the County. The ITS inventory progress was monitored through web-based software and summarizes the inventory data by agency jurisdiction and by arterial corridor. Li JMD S. Itagaki 1 p.2 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Ivan Salvatierra, PE, TE R JMQ ITS Infrastructure Lead Mr. Salvatierra has over 16 years of civil engineering experience and has .= worked on a variety of Civil, Traffic, ITS and Rail engineering projects for : • client cities, outside agencies, and private sectors. Ivan is responsible for management of preparation for studies,reports,design plans,specifications - and estimates. His multi-discipline expertise will bring background -. knowledge to any project from all aspects of design, coordination and /11001111 construction. Relevant Experience Citywide Analysis and High Priority SR-710 North Mitigation Projects —City of San Gabriel Served as Project Engineer responsible for developing citywide level of service, ridership, and cost and priority analysis to define necessary Title mitigation projects in lieu of a missing SR-710 Gap highway connection Senior Project Manager between 1-10 and 1-210 in the City of San Gabriel.The project,originated by Metro, was designed to define capacity needs through 2045 within the City Years of Experience directly or indirectly attributed to the missing SR-710 Gap with the intent of 16 improving safety and mobility for local and regional traffic.The following are the projects resulting from this project: Registration Professional Civil Engineer,CA, • Mission Road & Ramona Street #83901 • San Gabriel Boulevard/Interstate 10(SG-13) • Valley Boulevard &Abbot Avenue Professional Traffic Engineer,CA, • Walnut Grove Avenue& Las Tunas Drive(SG-5) #2533 • Del Mar Avenue/Mission Road/EI Monte Street Reconfiguration(SG-12) Education • Transit Service to Light Rail(SG-7) • B.S.,Civil Engineering,2006, • Mission Road &Junipero Serra Drive California State Polytechnic • Del Mar Avenue/Interstate 10(SG-13) University, Pomona • New Avenue/Interstate 10(SG-13) Affiliations • Local Circulator Bus Service(SG-9) • Institution of Transportation • Valley Boulevard &New Avenue Engineers, California • Mission Drive& Las Tunas Drive • Adaptive Signal Control Technology Systems on Valley Boulevard and San Gabriel Boulevard (SG-14) • San Gabriel Boulevard &Valley Boulevard • San Gabriel Boulevard & Marshall Street Realignment(SG-11) • Valley Boulevard & Del Mar Avenue • San Gabriel Boulevard &Las Tunas Drive • First-Mile/Last Mile Improvements(SG-8) • Walnut Grove Avenue&Grand Avenue(SG-5) • East Broadway Street(San Gabriel Boulevard to Muscatel Avenue) • Multimodal Transit Center(SG-6) • Citywide Bicycle Facilities (SG-4) • Valley Boulevard Corridor BRT(SG-10) ■■ JMD I. Salvatierra I p. 1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) SR-710 Gap Alternatives—LA Metro Serving as Sr. Traffic Engineer and member of the CH2M Team, responsible for alternatives analyses, technical assessments, conceptual and preliminary engineering, public involvement and community outreach support, and environmental studies to prepare a project report and appropriate environmental documents for the SR-710 Gap.The 710 Gap is a regionally significant project needed to close the current highway system gap between Interstates 10 and 210 in Los Angeles and Pasadena, California, respectively. JMD has developed various alternatives including Transportation Systems Management/Transportation Demand Management (TSM/TDM), a nearly 7-mile light rail transit (LRT) line, a 10-mile bus rapid transit (BRT) line and interchange improvements. JMD is responsible for designing arterial segments, interchanges, LRT and BRT alignments, and stations as well as "hot spot" intersections, adaptive signals, roundabouts, parking and LRT maintenance facilities. On-Call PM QC-TO6-I-405 and SR-170 Soundwall Projects—Metro CH2M Served as Project Manager responsible for part of the design team for the Metro Soundwall#11 along SR-170 in the City of Los Angeles. Construction of a new soundwall which included roadway and bridge widening along the northbound and southbound lanes at various locations. Tasks included preparation of final PS&E documents for utilities,sewer relocations,fiber optic communication,CMS signs,highway lighting,roadway lighting and ramp metering for both CALTRANS and City of Los Angeles Douglas Park Development—City of Long Beach Served as Project Engineer responsible for designing and preparing traffic signal modification plans for the installation of an Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS) for over 120 intersections. 4 north/south corridors and 4 east/west corridors were equipped with traffic signal detection and communication upgrades to accommodate the ATCS system. Traffic Management was controlled from the City's Public Works yard.The ATCS system was designed to adjust traffic timing along corridors to accommodate heavy direction volumes during peak hours.Before and after studies conducted showed a travel time savings of up to 10 minutes over a 6-mile trip.8 Changeable Message Signs(CMS)were designed and installed to warn travelers of potential delays and providing alternate routes.Tasks consisted of field verification of all existing signal equipment,design of system loops for ATCS, 7 CCTV cameras, 8 CMS and 16+ miles of fiber optic communication network with 8 hubs in Long Beach and its surrounding cities. Countywide ITS Inventory—LA Metro Served as Project Manager responsible for conducting an inventory of existing ITS equipment located in traffic signal cabinets for thirty(30)cities located in the Los Angeles County. Data was used to create a data base to assist Metro and local cities for assessment of future improvements. Coordination with over forty(40) cities was essential during the project to ensure Metro's database was an accurate representation of the existing ITS network. Tasks consisted of numerous field visits to traffic signal controllers and conducting an inventory of all equipment located in the cabinet. Atlantic Corridor Improvements—City of Long Beach Served as Project Engineer responsible for designing and preparing construction plans and documents for the modification of twenty (20)traffic signals and fiber optic communication along Atlantic Avenue in Long Beach. Tasks consisted of generating traffic signal modification plans, fiber optic communication plans, CCTV camera plans, construction cost estimate,and technical specifications documents.The signalized intersections were included into the City's Adaptive Traffic Control System. On-Call/Staff Augmentation Municipal Engineering Services—City of Industry Served as Project Manager responsible for all ITS management for the city. The County of Los Angeles maintains a wireless traffic signal communication system that coordinated through a central traffic management center. Most of the city's traffic signals are managed through the county's system and coordinated with the city. A city traffic model was being developed to analyze LOS and develop hotspot locations in need of improvement. Tasks included setting up a Traffic Management Center in the city's office,developing a citywide traffic model using Synchro.These projects/tasks included the following: • Traffic Management Center Development • Citywide ITS Solutions Coordination with County of • Development of Citywide Level of Service Study Los Angeles Department of Public Works. • Development of Citywide Traffic mode JMD I. Salvatierra p. 2 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Lan Saadatnejadi, MBA, PE : JIV1D Highways Lead Ms. Saadatnejadi has more than 31 years of experience in developing .. highway improvement projects. She has both public and private sector experiences in quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for State firHighway project study reports (PSR), project development support (PDS), project report(PR),and project plans,specifications,and estimates(PS&E). • ' She had managed both design and project management offices responsible for the quality production of Caltrans documents. She has comprehensive knowledge of federal, state, regional, and local transportation programs, including freeway-to-freeway interchanges, high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes, toll roads, high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, freeway widening, new freeways, freeway-to-local street interchanges, multi-purpose corridors,operational improvements,etc. Such comprehensive perspective provides a unique benefit of ensuring project documents are developed with the proper context in mind. Title Relevant Experience Project Manager • 1-710 Major Rehabilitation PID Years of Experience • 1-710/7th Street Interchange Modifications PSR&PR 31 • Amtrak, Los Angeles Union Station Run-Through Tracks PSR • City of Carson Redevelopment Agency,I-405 Avalon Interchange Project Registration • Overland Ave. Bridge Widening Over 1-10 Freeway PS&E Registered Professional Engineer, CA, • Pigeon Pass Road Widening PS&E, Moreno Valley, CA #C47795 • Oceanside SR 76/EI Camino Real Interchange Improvement Conceptual Education Design • MBA,California State University, • Oceanside SR 78&El Camino Real Bridge Widening PSR Long Beach • Riverside County Transportation Department 1-10/Main Street PSR • BS, Civil Engineering,California • Rancho Mission Viejo, Construction Support Services for Ortega State Polytechnic University, Highway Interim Improvements PR Pomona • Rancho Mission Viejo, Cow Camp Access Improvements Concept Affiliations Analysis American Society of Civil • Rancho Mission Viejo,Signalized Connection to Ortega Highway(SR 74) • Engineers PR&PS&E • Institute of Transportation • Rancho Mission Viejo, I-5/Crown Valley to SR73 Concept Analysis Engineers • Rancho Mission Viejo, Lower Ortega Highway (from Calle Entradero to WTS Antonio Parkway)Widening Project Concept Analysis • AASHTO • Rancho Mission Viejo, SR 241 Cow Camp Road Interchange Concept • Analysis • Oceanside, SR 78 Rancho Del Oro Interchange EIR/EIS • 1-5 HOV Widening from Orange County Line to SR-605 Major Investment Study(MIS), PR, PS&E • 1-60 HOV Widening PR • 1-110 at Temple Street Access Improvements PS&E • 1-5/1-10 Separation Access Improvements PID • 1-405 Auxiliary Lane from Waterford to 1-10 PSR&PAED • SR-47 Grade Separation PSR, PR, PS&E ■i JMD L. Saadatnejadi Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Frank Sanchez, PE i JMD Construction Management Title Mr. Sanchez has over 22 years of civil engineering, administration and Senior Project Manager construction of capital improvement infrastructure experience, Frank has worked on a variety of Civil, Public Works, and Construction Management Years of Experience engineering projects for client cities, public agencies, and private sectors. 22 His multi-discipline expertise will bring background knowledge to any project from all aspects of design,coordination and construction. Registration Professional Civil Engineer,CA, Relevant Experience #C-61326 Morning Canyon Drive Roadway Rehabilitation—City of Diamond Bar Served as Public Works Construction Inspector responsible for providing Education Public Works Inspection services including verification of contractors work • M.B.A.,Construction quantities and payment requests, coordination of independent material Management, 1998, California testers and employee interviews for prevailing wage verification. State University, Long Beach 2017 Annual Street Improvement Project—City of Laguna Beach • B.S.,Civil Engineering, 1994 Served as Public Works Construction Inspector responsible for providing California State University, Long Public Works Inspection services including verification of contractors work Beach quantities and payment requests, coordination of independent material • Professional Land Surveying, testers and employee interviews for prevailing wage verification. Santiago Community College, California On-Call Engineering—City of Costa Mesa Served as Construction Services Officer responsible for managed Construction and Inspection Services of public and private construction within the public right-of-way for the City of Costa Mesa as required under conditions of approval. Routinely, assigned inspectors for assignment coverage and reviewed discrepancies contrary to city standards. Tasks included contractor and utility company correspondence,review of pans and specifications for compliance and oversight of contractor payments. On-Call Engineering/Staff Augmentation Services—City of South Gate Served as Project Manager responsible for providing on-call project management services for the construction of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). Tasks included managing, coordinating and corresponding with designers, contractors, utility representatives, City staff and the public at large. Projects under construction and in design included: • FY 17-18 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement • Walnut Street Parking Lot Reconstruction Project • Hildreth Street Traffic Mitigation Project • Civic Center Exterior Lighting &Wayfinding Signage Improvements • Police Department Parking Lot Expansion • Long Beach Boulevard Urban Greening Improvements Project • Garfield Avenue Complete Streets Project • FY 18-19 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Project ■■ JMD F. Sanchez Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Section III Company Qualifications JMD Project Management Services Related to R-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) III. Company Qualifications Company Qualifications Prime Consultant Planning JMDiaz, Inc. (JMD), a California corporation, offers a full • Civil range of transportation planning and civil engineering Master Plans covering highways, roadways, land development, traffic, rail Concept Design and transit projects for local agencies, schools, railroads and Feasibility Studies private entities in California. • Highways Project Study Reports Originally founded by Juan M. Diaz in 2001, JMD is serving Project Reports clients from its office in City of Industry, California. Currently, • Land Development JMD has a staff of 24 professionals and administrative staff. Master Plans Traffic Impact Studies Through the proven experience of its professionals and • Traffic technical staff, JMD has earned a reputation of quality, Traffic Impact Studies commitment and responsiveness by providing innovative and Warrant Analysis timely design solutions on projects sponsored by private • Rail developers and public agencies. JMD's reputation is Rail Corridor/Feasibility Studies complemented by its values and commitment to improve Rail Safety Studies/Grade Crossing Analysis quality of life as expressed in its mission statement: Quiet Zones • Structures "To provide responsive, innovative and effective Grade Separation Feasibility Studies solutions that improve quality of life." Engineering In addition to its comprehensive qualifications, JMD is also • Highway/Roadway Design certified with local agencies as a: Mainlines/Ramps/Interchanges Roadway Rehabilitation/Streetscapes • Community Business Enterprise(CBE) Bikeways/Trails • Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE) • Land Development • Local Small Business Enterprise(LSBE) Residential/Commercial Sites • Minority Business Enterprise(MBE) Campus Expansions/Master Plans • Rail Design(HSR, Light, Commuter&Freight) Services Mainline/Industry/Shoofly Alignment Grade Crossings/Stations/Quiet Zones JMD offers a wide range of services covering planning, • Structures engineering and management for public and private sector Rail/Highway Grade Separations clients. These services, outlined to the right, cover all phases Pedestrian Bridges of project development from conceptual design through • Traffic/Transit Design construction. Such depth of services is one of JMD's unique Signing and Striping and distinguishing characteristics that have contributed to its Traffic Signals/Lighting/Traffic Control success. Rail/Bus Rapid Transit Corridors Location Stations/Parking Facilities JMD is located at the address shown below: Management 18645 East Gale Avenue, Suite 212 • Project/Municipal Services/Program Management • • Staff Augmentation City of Industry, CA 91748-1363 • Construction Management and Inspection Phone(626)820-1137 • Fax(626)820-1136 JMDp.III-1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Ill. Company Qualifications Relevant Project Experience JMD and its staff have unique qualifications and an $ extensive history providing staff augmentation civil and traffic engineering services and project management to 1 ' . numerous agencies in Southern California. Our �> >��� 710 _ I comprehensive qualifications cover analysis, as well I t` as civil design (land development and transportation �1 design), traffic (signing, striping, traffic signals, traffic 1�` control)design, ITS solutions and lighting expertise for multimodal facilities. '' ..,,, , !tiif" ` JMD was involved in the development of the SR-710 Client: LA Metro(do CH2M Hill) North(Gap)Study which identified various alternatives Reference: Yoga Chandran, Project Manager and projects for the cities along the missing gap. This 6 Hutton Center Drive,Ste 700 and other JMD projects providingtimelyassistance Sa4aAna1600Tel 92707 (714)460-1600 Tel and expertise to local city agencies are listed below. cyogach@hntb.com Duration: 2012—Ongoing SR-710 Gap Alternatives Analyses and Project Personnel: J.Diaz,I.Salvatierra,S.Itagaki,G.Andrade Report Preparation, Los Angeles County, CA JMD was a member of the CH2M (now Jacobs)Team Citywide Analysis and High Priority SR-710 responsible for alternatives analyses, technical North Mitigation Projects, City of San Gabriel assessments,conceptual and preliminary engineering, JMD was responsible for developing citywide level of public involvement and community outreach support, service, ridership, cost and priority analysis to define and environmental studies to prepare a project report necessary mitigation projects in lieu of a missing SR- and appropriate environmental documents for the SR 710 Gap highway connection between 1-10 and 1-210 710 Gap. The 710 Gap is a regionally significant in the City of San Gabriel. The project, originated by project needed to close the current highway system Metro,was designed to define capacity needs through gap between Interstates 10 and 210 in Los Angeles 2045 within the City directly or indirectly attributed to and Pasadena, California, respectively. JMD has the missing SR-710 Gap with the intent of improving developed various alternatives including safety and mobility for local and regional traffic. The Transportation Systems Management/Transportation following are the projects resulting from this project: Demand Management (TSM/TDM), a nearly 7-mile light rail transit (LRT) line, a 10-mile bus rapid transit • Mission Road &Ramona Street (BRT) line and interchange improvements. JMD was • San Gabriel Boulevard/Interstate 10(SG-13) responsible for designing arterial segments, • Valley Boulevard &Abbot Avenue interchanges, LRT and BRT alignments and stations • Walnut Grove Avenue&Las Tunas Drive(SG-5) as well as "hot spot" intersections, roundabouts, dirt • Del Mar Avenue/Mission Road/EI Monte Street hauling by train, parking and LRT maintenance Reconfiguration (SG-12) facilities. • Transit Service to Light Rail(SG-7) • Mission Road &Junipero Serra Drive • Del Mar Avenue/Interstate 10(SG-13) • New Avenue/Interstate 10(SG-13) • Local Circulator Bus Service(SG-9) • Valley Boulevard&New Avenue • Mission Drive&Las Tunas Drive • Adaptive Signal Control Technology Systems on Valley Blvd &San Gabriel Blvd (SG-14) • San Gabriel Boulevard&Valley Boulevard • San Gabriel Boulevard & Marshall Street Realignment(SG-11) JMDp.111-2 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Ill. Company Qualifications • Valley Boulevard & Del Mar Avenue Client: City of San Gabriel • San Gabriel Boulevard &Las Tunas Drive Contact: Daren Grilley,PE,City Engineer (SG-8) (Formerly with City of San Gabriel) • First-Mile/Last Mile Improvements 455 N.Rexford Drive • Walnut Grove Avenue&Grand Avenue(SG-5) Beverly Hills,CA 90210 • East Broadway Street (San Gabriel Boulevard to (310)285-1000 Tel., Muscatel Avenue)(SG-3) dgrilley@beverlyhills.org • Multimodal Transit Center(SG-6) Duration: 2013 2014 • Citywide Bicycle Facilities(SG-4) • Valley Boulevard Corridor BRT(SG 10) Municipal Engineering and Staff Augmentation City of Industry Client: City of San Gabriel JMD is currently providing on call and staff Contact: Algis Marciuska(former Associate City Engineer) augmentation services to the City of Industry including 425 S.Mission Drive studies and design for roadways, traffic signals, San Gabriel,CA 91776 railroad crossings and rail/highway grade separations. (213)507-7835 Tel. A short list of these projects/tasks include the following: amarciuska@jmdiaz.com Duration: 2018 • Citywide Hot Spot Monitoring and TMC Personnel: J.Diaz,I.Salvatierra,I.Pedroza Development On Call Project Management, City of San • E&T Speed Limit Signs Gabriel • Citywide Traffic Model CIP Annual Development JMD provided project management and construction •• Metro Grade Crossing Program administration services on an on-call basis to the City • Citywide Accident Review and Monitoring of San Gabriel to assist in Capital Improvement Project • Temple Avenue Stairways (CIP) delivery. Projects included roadway and bus • Fairway Drive Queue Cutter Signal shelter projects throughout the City.JMD also provided on-call traffic engineering services to the City of San • Crossroads Parkway Traffic Signal Gabriel.Services included study reviews,plan reviews, • Colima Rd/Walnut Hall Rd Traffic Signal Study and special investigations and studies as well as traffic • Gale Avenue/Stoner Creek Traffic Signal Timing signal and stop control warrant analysis.JMD reviewed Optimization traffic signal, traffic control and street lighting plans as • Metro Grade Crossing Program well as performed special investigations or studies • UPRR Grade Crossing(4)Signing/Striping Plan related to safe route to schools including lighting Review assessments. • 801 Baldwin Park Blvd Guardrail • Vineland Drive-In Pedestrian Crossing • Fairway Drive Grade Separation Coordination ,err - ' --- _. _ . .. .. F-7- ,,,._,, ,, ....„--. ...„__ , 1 . ...... , ._ qmi _ - _ ‘_:.7 , . . _ i . ,4.-_ .. ..... , ,.... .. , F,.: 1. ,,....... . . % D p.111-3 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Ill. Company Qualifications Client: City of Industry . Contact: Mr.Alex Gonzalez (Former)Director of Development Services >.. •(0� 14]1 and Administration u _ 15625 Stafford Street co:. ... City of Industry,CA 91744 - - (626)319-8442 Tel. y' agonzalez42@aol.com _ c .4-44/41- vltl: Duration: 2016—2020 �;. { > : 'i. Personnel: J.Diaz,I.Salvatierra,S.Itagaki,G.Andrade i' 1�'��_i . �" • i,! f„ - .I_ma t,t Staff Augmentation Services/Metro Gold Line — Light Rail Transit Engineering, City of Glendora Client: City of Brea JMD is currently providing initial advisory and review Contact: Michael Ho,PE,Deputy Director of Public services for the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension, Works/City Engineer Phase 2B (Azusa to Claremont) on behalf of the City. 1 Civic&Cultural Center This includes review of track, grade crossings, Brea,CA 928 mich aelh @cityofbre 2 yofbrea.net stations, bridges,grading,drainage, right of way,utility Duration: 2018-Ongoing and parking facility improvements within the City of Personnel: D.Solanki J.Diaz Glendora. f NscVi(:, .1, . ... . .,„„,„.:_.J., , ! - _ _ _ . __ ____ _ __ ... _ Client: City of Glendora Contact: Alison Sweet,Assistant Public Works Director 116 East Foothill Boulevard Glendora,CA 91741 (626)914-8248 Tel. ASweet@ci.glendora.ca.us Duration: 2016-2025 Personnel: J.Diaz,S.Itagaki,I.Salvatierra,G.Andrade On Call Engineering, City of Brea JMD is currently providing on-call engineering services to the City of Brea, involving on-site plan checking, coordination and project management, as well as offsite engineering analysis and design services. Projects include transportation and land development improvements, including entitlement packages. : : JMD p.111-4 ' LN.sist.ni� Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobilit Im o rovement Projects (RFP No 2020-11) • _ _._ � a_ . . _. . - . rte- __- Section IV References isi JMD Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) IV. References References We take pride in the professional relationships we have developed with our clients, and encourage the City to contact the references listed below. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Yoga Chandran Relevant Project: (Formerly CH2M Hill now Jacobs) 710 Gap Alternatives, Los Angeles,CA Project Manager LACMTA JMD is a member of the CH2M(now Jacobs)Team responsible for 6 Hutton Center Drive alternatives analyses, technical assessments, conceptual and preliminary engineering, public involvement and community Suite 700 outreach support, and environmental studies to prepare a project Santa Ana, CA 92707 report and appropriate environmental documents for the SR 710 (714)460-1600 Gap. JMD has developed various alternatives including cyogach@hntb.com Transportation Systems Management/Transportation Demand Management(TSM/TDM),a nearly 7-mile light rail transit(LRT)line, a 10-mile bus rapid transit (BRT) line and interchange improvements. JMD is responsible for designing arterial segments, interchanges, LRT and BRT alignments and stations as well as"hot spot" intersections, roundabouts, dirt hauling by train, parking and LRT maintenance facilities. City of San Gabriel Daren Grilley, PE Relevant Project: (Formerly with City of San Gabriel) > On-Call Project Management/Staff Augmentation Services City Engineer City of Beverly Hills JMD provided project management and construction administration 455 N. Rexford Drive services on an on-call basis to the City of San Gabriel to assist in Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Capital Improvement Project (CIP) delivery. Projects included roadway and bus shelter projects throughout the City. JMD also (310)285-1000 provided on-call traffic engineering services to the City of San dgrilley@beverlyhills.org Gabriel. Services included study reviews, plan reviews, and special investigations and studies as well as traffic signal and stop control warrant analysis. JMD reviewed traffic signal, traffic control and street lighting plans as well as performed special investigations or studies related to safe route to schools including lighting assessments. LJMD p IV-1 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) IV. References City of San Gabriel Algis Marciuska, MBA, PE Relevant Project: Former Associate City Engineer Metro 710 Gap Projects Priority and Ranking City of San Gabriel 425 S. Mission Drive JMD was responsible for developing citywide level of service, San Gabriel, CA 91776 ridership, cost and priority analysis to define necessary mitigation (213)507 7835 projects in lieu of a missing SR-710 Gap highway connection between I-10 and 1-210 in the City of San Gabriel. The project, amarciuska@jmdiaz.com originated by Metro,was designed to define capacity needs through 2045 within the City directly or indirectly attributed to the missing SR-710 Gap with the intent of improving safety and mobility for local and regional traffic.The following are the projects resulting from this project: • Mission Road & Ramona Street • San Gabriel Boulevard/Interstate 10(SG-13) • Valley Boulevard &Abbot Avenue • Walnut Grove Avenue&Las Tunas Drive(SG-5) • Del Mar Avenue/Mission Road/EI Monte Street Reconfiguration(SG-12) • Transit Service to Light Rail(SG-7) • Mission Road &Junipero Serra Drive • Del Mar Avenue/Interstate 10(SG-13) • New Avenue/Interstate 10(SG-13) • Local Circulator Bus Service(SG-9) • Valley Boulevard &New Avenue • Mission Drive& Las Tunas Drive • Adaptive Signal Control Technology Systems on Valley Blvd &San Gabriel Blvd (SG-14) • San Gabriel Boulevard &Valley Boulevard • San Gabriel Blvd & Marshall Street Realignment(SG-11) • Valley Boulevard & Del Mar Avenue • San Gabriel Boulevard & Las Tunas Drive • First-Mile/Last Mile Improvements(SG-8) • Walnut Grove Avenue&Grand Avenue(SG-5) • East Broadway Street(San Gabriel Boulevard to Muscatel Avenue)(SG-3) • Multimodal Transit Center(SG-6) . • Citywide Bicycle Facilities(SG-4) • Valley Boulevard Corridor BRT(SG-10) ■ J M D p.IV-2 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) IV. References City of Glendora Alison Sweet Relevant Project: Director of Public Works > Metro Gold Line Transit Engineering City of Glendora 116 E. Foothill Boulevard JMD provided utility design support for the segment of the Glendora, CA 91741-3380 Foothill light rail transit project from Pasadena to Azusa.Project (626)916 8200 tasks included updating the utility base map, developing conceptual relocation exhibits for the provisional utilities, asweet@cityofglendora.org review of company work orders, developing relocation packages for contract utilities, coordinating approvals, and developing utility specifications. City of Industry Alex Gonzalez,PE Relevant Project: City of Industry > City Design Engineering Services Former Director of Development Services&Administration JMD is currently providing on call and staff augmentation services Stafford to the City of Industry including construction inspection,studies and 15625 City f Industry,ordStC91744 design for roadways, traffic signals, railroad crossings and rail/highway grade separations. These projects/tasks include the (626)319-8442 following: agonzalez42@sbcglobal.net • Amar Road/Baldwin Avenue Traffic Signal and Safety Improvements • Temple Avenue Stairways • Fairway Drive Queue Cutter Signal • Crossroads Parkway Traffic Signal • Colima Road/Walnut Hall Road Traffic Signal Study • Traffic Management Center Development/TSSP . . JMD p.IV-3 Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) Section V Standard Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements w . JMD I Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) V.Standard Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements Standard Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements JMD has reviewed the City's Standard Professional Services Agreement and insurance requirements. After careful review, JMD has no exceptions to the City's agreement, and if selected as the Prime Consultant, will maintain the required certificate of insurance throughout the duration of the project JMDp.V-1 3"n Project Management Services Related to 'v5t\TIAL , S -710 North Corridor Mobilit Im•rovement Pro ects (REP No 2020-11) Section VI Addenda Acknowledgement JMD Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects (RFP No. 2020-11) VI.Addenda Acknowledgement Addenda Acknowledgement JMD acknowledges the City has published no addenda to RFP No. 2020-11. . : JMD p.VI-1 ■ ■ PLANNING I ENGINEERING I MANAGEMENT JMDiaz, Inc. 18645 East Gale Avenue, Suite 212 City of Industry, CA 91748 www jmdiazcom 110 In/i7- k' . ..-.....,,,-.---Aft,,, , . } i 4a" a.% .1 i Y► C r i - rr �# -� -,qui AJ C:11 t1ALL 1 • -i.". ,101 a , _ 1,i A nn i .iUt•PUO , i. t,� . i ' *1. -IV'It fY ,.A w +.4a-./A } -. Ste.: - CITY OF ROSEMEAD Technical Proposal Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects RFP No. 2020-11 January 14, 2020 TERRY RODRIGUE,PE,TE II President E.Chief Executive Officer of Interwest Consulting Group,Inc. 1500 S.Haven Avenue,Suite 220 Ontario,CA 91761//(909)295-3142 It' :{z .; :.:ri;_ +Ij1•,'. ff:�_i tv r t d � '� r-,\+ `-• 4 .." - ' ,,. ! -th, * At-- ";. + > • II?. v iiCi�C:71 iALlw.* . ):l1� %,nPY, - Si6 - eec' --Iffll aFT ..ejj • - - ' I • • . t - .:_ v. fir.. •.�..r.ti- ` e$ , � r'- _ r =- 1'. .41:J d of ate' ',�. tea i .. T ", • }, L.,,aa ��•H a .4--.11k#. CITY OF ROSEMEAD Technical Proposal Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects RFP No. 2020-11 January 14, 2020 TERRY RODRIGUE,PE,TE//President E.Chief Executive Officer of Interwest Consulting Group,Inc. 1500 S. Haven Avenue,Suite 220 Ontario,CA 91761//(909)295-3142 January 14,2021 41111 Chris Daste,Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 E.Valley Boulevard Rosemead,CA 91770 I N T E R W E S T RE:Request for Proposal No.2020-11 to Provide Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects Dear Mr. Daste, Interwest Consulting Group (Interwest) is pleased to submit our proposal to provide Project Management Services to the City of Rosemead's upcoming SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects. Our submittal is crafted for the purpose of demonstrating our ability to perform the tasks outlined in the City's RFP. With more than 500 employees, we are large enough to provide qualified staff in a variety of public works specialties, yet small enough to ensure that we maintain focus and are responsive to the City's needs. We thoroughly understand the challenges and requirements faced by municipal governments since many of our staff have held senior and executive management positions with numerous California cities. The City of Rosemead is a working-class suburb growing within its diverse population base that values the importance of honoring tradition, uniting in diversity,and evolving for the future. Interwest would be honored to contribute to these values and align our goals together in this working partnership. As the City may know, Interwest is currently providing Building Plan Review and Inspection services for the Community Development Department and has been since May 2018. Since that time,we have also provided IT and Engineering services to the City, increasing our familiarity with your community and its departments. This proposal details our firm's experience and qualifications, the experience of key personnel proposed to provide Project Management services,and our understanding of the project requirements and approach for the City.Our capabilities and qualifications include: Decades of public works Project Management,Traffic Engineering and Transportation experience. A proposed team familiar with applicable regulatory agencies' rules and regulations and the ability to work and communicate with the City,members of the public,consultants,contractors,developers,and others for a successful project delivery. Our designated Project Manager,Manuel Gomez,is an experienced public works professional with more than 25 years of experience serving municipal public works departments in Orange County. Before joining Interwest, he was the Director of Public Works for the City of Irvine for 13 years and held several management positions with the City of Santa Ana over the course of another 13 years. Manuel is known for his collaborative and inclusive management style, bringing the best out in the staff that he supervises. He is proficient in state and local laws and practices,and active in industry associations. 1500 S Haven Ave I Suite 220 Ontario,CA 91761 909.295.3142 INTERWESTGRP.CON Our Deputy Project Manager and Traffic Engineer will be Steven L.Wright,PE,TE,a registered civil and traffic engineer with more than 30 years of relevant experience managing and overseeing federally funded traffic and civil projects. Our Caltrans Liaison, Dan Garcia has worked extensively with Caltrans and other local regulating agencies. As a City Engineer for the City of Norwalk, Dan was responsible for the I-5 Widening coordination with Caltrans and the City,as well as managing the design of the Firestone Bridge over the San Gabriel River and for obtaining the Caltrans E-76 for construction of the$24 million project. Our team is ready and available to provide the City with Right of Way assistance. In addition, Interwest proposes to partner with Arellano Associates(AA)to provide the City with Public Outreach services, as well as GCAP Services to provide the City with Federal Compliance services. I will serve as the City's Principal-in-Charge.Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our Project Manager,or reach out to me directly. Our contact information is provided below: TerryRodrip Manuel Game> President&CEO I Principal-in-Charge Project Manager (303)479-4955 I trodrigue@interwestgrp.com (949)677-2386 I cmgomez@interwestgrp.com Local Project Office:1500 S Haven Ave,Suite 220,Ontario,CA 91761 (909)295-3142 We greatly appreciate this opportunity to present Interwest's qualifications and standard rates for services as established herein.We look forward to further discussing our qualifications and providing planning services to the City of Rosemead. Respectfully Submitted, Terry Rodrigue,PE,TE President&CEO Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. gyp' {.; 3 Table of Contents Cover Letter Table of Contents SECTION 1 Approach and Scope of Work 5 Knowledge and Understanding of Rosemead 5 Services Interwest will Provide the City of Rosemead 6 Project Management Services 6 SECTION 2 Project Team,Key Personnel and Resumes 14 Organizational Chart 14 Key Personnel 15 Support Personnel 19 SECTION 3 Company Qualifications 23 The I nterwest Advantage 24 Our Commitment to the City of Rosemead 24 Subconsultant Information 25 SECTION 4 References 30 SECTION 5 Standard Draft Professional ServicesAgreement&Insurance 31 SECTION 6 Addenda Acknowledgment 32 Appendix Resumes of Interwest Key Staff&Subconsultants INTERWEST 4 SECTION 1 Approach and Scope of Work Utilizing Interwest is a valuable strategy for delivering cost-effective, high quality and efficient services. As a --.Vlio't,- municipal consulting firm with nearly 500 professionals, 'e."'= we work exclusively for public agencies, gaining hands 1),,--- on experience while eliminating any real or perceived -1-'- ..ti III professional conflicts. ��� ' , vi 1 We know that the City of Rosemead (City) is a working- ' - z;::. class suburb growing within its diverse population base. ; ; '' The City values the importance of honoring tradition, -' uniting in diversity, and evolving for the future. Our team would be honored to contribute towards these values and the City's goals of improving public areas including infrastructure,community facilities,enhancing public safety and the overall community environment, providing opportunities for residents through programs, services, education, and recreation;ensuring the City's financial stability and providing basic services to your community. As the City may know, Interwest is currently providing Building Plan Review and Inspection Safety services for the Community Development Department and has been since May 2018. Since that time, we have also provided IT and Engineering services to the City, increasing our familiarity with your community and its departments. It is our understanding that the City seeks qualified consultants to provide Project Management Services for the SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement Projects. After a thorough review of the City's RFP, our team is ready to propose complete Project Management services and as part of managing the designated project, Interwest will also prepare RFP's, NIB's, and Agreements to select various consultants which include: Designers, Environmental, ROW, Engineering,and Geotechnical. Approach to Scope of Work Proposed Interwest staff detailed in Section 2will be prepared to provide the services listed below,as well as any other related services the City may need during the contract term. Coordination is the core of what we do at Interwest.We were founded by former municipal employees to provide staff augmentation services, and our 500+employees are experienced in working with City staff daily. As such they have a practical understanding of our clients' processes, preferences and working environments. We have the demonstrated ability to successfully work side-by-side with City staff and outside agencies towards common goals. INTERWEST 5 Interwest staff begins the coordination process by working with the City's Management staff to define and fully understand the projects,City goals,and all funding sources. Interwest staff will then complete all steps of the assignment, taking care to keep within the guidelines required by all local, state, and federal laws to ensure there are no issues throughout the duration of the assignments. Our goal is to ensure there are no surprises and no lost opportunities for the City. Open and ongoing communication is the key to maintaining a close and positive working relationship with City staff. We understand that we serve multiple clients - including City staff, Metro, Caltrans, residents,and other stakeholders-and that clear communication with each is critical to our ability to serve all clients effectively. Our proposed Program and Project Managers are well-versed in LAPM standards and have extensive experience delivering federally funded projects, including the associated communication and coordination with Caltrans, local agencies, and regulatory or permitting agencies involved. We are committed to maintaining open communication with all Rosemead City stakeholders. Services Interwest will provide to the City of Rosemead Project Management Services Interwest has extensive experience and success in developing and implementing municipal public works projects, including those with State and/or Federal funding requiring compliance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.We create and apply management systems that work and carefully monitor program effectiveness by closely tracking work quality, quantity, and cost. Our approach begins with the identification of specific project priorities and their scheduled completions. Delivering large-specialized Capital Projects under aggressive schedules involves management, administration, and oversight of project development teams from inception to completion. Project management to Interwest means complete ownership of all aspects including project delivery,funding, project development, and programming. We measure our success in meeting deadlines, project budgets and most importantly,our client's expectations. Areas of focus include: Providing overall project and program management of the projects from initial project development through the end of construction and project closeout. Monitoring program effectiveness and agency coordination on joint projects Coordinating all projects and activities with involved agencies and stakeholders, including the City,adjacent local agencies that may be impacted by the proposed improvements or may have received funding from METRO in the adjacent areas, METRO, County, Caltrans, and any other agencies and organizations that have jurisdictional control, regulatory agencies, and stakeholders as necessary Providing stakeholder and community outreach and working with utility agencies on relocations Preparing necessary request for proposals, notice for inviting bids, agreements, and assisting in the selection of various consultants Following Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual and Guidelines Ensuring environmental regulation compliances Providing advanced project planning and assisting with bid and award contracts Managing federally funded projects and outside agency encroachment permits Project Manager, Manuel Gomez will be responsible for the oversight of all aspects of the project and primarily keeping the work on schedule and in budget. The projects are Measure R funded mobility improvements and consists of ramp improvements, adaptive traffic controls and traffic signal improvements. Please refer to the projects listed below for more information: Interstate 10/Rosemead Blvd Westbound - - Ramps Improvements: This project will reconfigure the I-10 westbound on and off ramps at Rosemead Boulevard to increase414 capacity. It will also provide additional lanes .1 ��k _ to increase capacity; widen the east side of I- Rosemead Boulevard to add an exclusive right turn lane from northbound Rosemead to easterly westbound 1-10; provide an additional lane for the 1-10 westbound off ramp; add an exclusive right turn lane from westbound Glendon Way to northbound Rosemead; eliminate the left turn lane from 1-10 westerly westbound off ramp to westbound Glendon Way; widen the west side of Rosemead Boulevard to provide a wider right turn lane and improve the traffic flow; reconfigure the geometrics (alignment) of west approach on Glendon Way west of Rosemead Boulevard, and provide a left turn lane from WB Glendon Way to the westbound 1-10 ramp; and widen the southwest corner of Glendon Way and the 1-5 westbound on ramp to accommodate right turn traffic onto the ramps. Rosemead Boulevard is one of the busiest north-south regional corridors that extends from the 60 Freeway to the 10 Freeway,and from the 10 Freeway to the 210 Freeway. Due to the current geometric constraints and insufficient lane capacities at the Rosemead Boulevard and 1-10 freeway westbound on and off ramps, significant delays are experienced throughout the day. This project will improve the traffic flow and mobility significantly. Interstate 10/Walnut Grove Avenue Westbound Ramps Improvements: This project will reconfigure the 1-10 westbound on • and off ramps at Walnut Grove Avenue;realign the southbound right turn lane from Walnut Grove Avenue to the westbound on ramp, and -- ' westbound lanes on the ramp;modify striping on north and south approaches of Walnut Grove Avenue,and install a traffic signal;and realign the 1,• "$ westbound on and off ramps at San Gabriel �3 Boulevard, and install a new traffic signal. Walnut Grove Avenue is a regional corridor that extends from the 60 Freeway to the 10 Freeway, and from the 10 Freeway north, connecting to three east-west regional corridors (Valley Boulevard, Mission Road and Las Tunas Drive). Due to current geometric constraints, traffic t ., 7 exiting the westbound off ramp onto Walnut Grove Avenue is required to stop and wait for gaps in the north-south traffic before proceeding, which results in delays. This project will improve the traffic flow and mobility significantly. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project(Garvey,Valley, San Gabriel,Walnut Grove C. Rosemead): This project will install adaptive traffic/traffic responsive signal control throughout Rosemead on "101 Garvey Avenue at 9 intersections, Valley Boulevard at 7 intersections, San Gabriel Boulevard at 6 intersections, Walnut Grove `" Avenue at 16 intersections and Rosemead Boulevard at 5 intersection to optimize t — traffic signal timing during peak hours to _ improve the directional flow of traffic based on the arrival of vehicles at an intersection and real-time traffic demand and congested conditions. Garvey Avenue and Valley Boulevard are major east-west arterials used to bypass freeway traffic. This project will optimize traffic operations and improve mobility along these regional corridors. Traffic Signal Improvements(San Gabriel,Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead&Valley Blvd): This project will implement traffic signal improvements to optimize traffic 4 flow along major arterials by construction '$' of protective left turn phasing, :1 �9 protected/permitted left turn phasing,right ; • •-gr•-• Or. . turn overlap phasing and equipmentiret upgrades at several intersection within the --4"41110 City of Rosemead that are adversely -•- "" impacted by the absence of a portion of the < , State Route 710 freeway. This project will improve mobility and traffic operations on major arterials that are used to bypass freeway traffic. Mr. Gomez will coordinate closely with SGVCOG, METRO and City staff throughout the duration of this project. Project cost and schedule control will be aggressively monitored, and a variety of project delivery status reports will be prepared. Metro and the City will be well informed as to the project health through our project controls activities. A master project schedule will be the key tool to project delivery success. It will highlight the significant milestones that require decisions,clarify which project issues have a priority for resolution,and provide early warning to aid in the development implantation of efficient schedule recovery strategies. + - Pr C 8 The following activities are specific Project Management activities included in the proposed scope of work: Project Management Plan Prepare project management plan (PMP) that will address specific project protocols including communications, environmental and regulatory permit compliance responsibilities and status reporting The PMP will be instrumental in guiding the delivery of the projects, aiding team members who provide intermittent roles on the project. Project Schedule After the City finalizes the funding agreements with METRO,project schedules will be established based on final funds and timing. The project schedules will be established based on final funding amounts, availability, environmental clearances, ROW acquisitions and jurisdictional and regulatory agencies. After which, Interwest will oversee the preparation of a master program/project schedule.The master schedule will integrate schedule elements prepared by other project vendors, including the design consultant and/or construction manager. The master schedule will identify: Milestones for each phase of the project activities Timing for federal, state and local plan review, permit applications, processing time and approvals Long-lead procurements items Critical path third party agreements such as construction agreements Post construction activities Master schedule maintenance will be completed on a weekly basis,maximizing the opportunity of resolving issues timely Project Meetings Project meetings are a vital project delivery,communication, and decision-making tool. Our team will provide support to project meeting as described below: Conduct and oversee weekly team meetings. Prepare agendas and meetings minutes weekly Attend project development team meetings and provide project status reports Attend monthly METRO/SGVCOG meetings and provide project status reports Participate in comment review/resolution meetings during design phase Provide supporting materials for METRO/SGVCOG/City Council meetings Provide support for pre-proposal and pre-bid meeting to assist in presenting comprehensive information to prospective bidders and to facilitate the efficient completion of each solicitation Document Control A written document control system (web-based) is crucial to efficiently control documents, provide information to team members, and retrieve key information during later phases of the project's life cycle or even after the project is closed.The document control plan will be evaluated and updated when the project management plan is updated. Document control elements include: INTERWEST 9 Project Correspondence Document distribution File Index structure File recovery Project Scoping Develop and review project parameters with the City and Metro Conduct all necessary field review and record research to fully develop the project scope Prepare preliminary budget and determine a schedule Develop a list of project stakeholders Set up an electronic file and communications repository Organize internal scoping meetings Secure all consultants by preparation of Requests for Proposals, notices,and agreements Assist with the selection of consultants for a variety of professional services Monthly Progress reports and Quarterly Expenditure Reports will be prepared and submitted to METRO All requirements applicable to the funding agreement will be complied with Document all activities and expenditures during reporting period Track and report project schedule Report any project delays Develop an RFQ/RFP to hire consultants for design of the projects Advertise the RFQ Conduct the selection process and negotiate design contract Prepare a memo to accompany the agenda item to City Council for approval Organize meetings with stake holders to seek input Secure the necessary survey information Oversee the PS&E phase Conduct design review and comment resolution Present the design at various stages to the stakeholders for input Secure the necessary permits to construct the project Guide the process to secure Caltrans District 12 approval Work with the Design Firm to provide a simplified construction drawing showing the existing ROW,proposed ROW,Temporary Construction Easements and Permanent Drainage Easements Show the locations of utility poles that need to be moved and their location relative to the ROW Research the history of the road and determine when the street was accepted for maintenance by the City or Caltrans Locate any ROW dedication plats or historical maps Prepare a utility position document for Utility Company to establish the City's position on relocation and cost responsibilities INTERWEST 10 Ensure the Utility Company performs the relocations in a timely fashion to allow project construction to proceed Prepare a packet of information for the City Real Estate division to provide the parameters of potential impacts to the public right of way and/or private property Meet with City Real Estate division to coordinate efforts regarding ROW impacts As necessary,accompany the Real Estate division to meet with property owners and explain the construction impacts Seek concurrence of the City/State ROW Office that the acquisitions have been performed in accordance with Federal Guidelines Oversee process to bid the construction work Secure approval from Metro/Caltrans to proceed with advertising Advertise the project,conduct the bid opening,and negotiate a construction contract Prepare a memo to accompany the agenda item to City Council for approval Develop a RFQ/RFP to hire a consultant for Construction Administration and Inspection of the project Secure approval from metro to proceed with advertising Perform constructability review analysis review Advertise the RFQ/RFP,conduct the selection process,and negotiate a contract Prepare a memo to accompany the agenda item to City Council for approval Ensure as-built drawings are completed and submitted to City upon project completion using an engineering drawing software that is acceptable to all agencies involved Conduct a Pre-Construction meeting to get the project underway Secure METRO/Caltrans approval to proceed with construction Monitor the work of the City or Consultant Inspector Attend weekly meetings Monitor the progress of the project to ensure it proceeds on schedule and within budget Process change orders as necessary Prepare and approve monthly payments At the end of the project perform a punch-list inspection Prepare appropriate documentation to receive reimbursements Our Real Estate team provides full service municipal real estate consultation and turn-key right-of-way services inclusive of project management, acquisition, appraisal, appraisal review, relocation assistance,property management,escrow and title coordination,and condemnation support.We serve our clients from early project planning to full possession of properties for project construction.Our real 11 estate team skillfully performs all right-of-way functions,and they are experts at navigating through the legal and regulatory requirements necessary to acquire land and right-of way for public projects for city, county and state agencies. Real Estate Project Management Project Initiation, Planning and Coordination Appraisal Management Acquisition Negotiation Project Certification Title and Escrow Services Condemnation Services Information Management and Control Systems: Interwest's Information Technology team has extensive experience developing, customizing, implementing, and troubleshooting project tracking databases and collection tools for municipal public works projects. We have implemented useful and effective business management reporting systems for our clients for the purpose of collecting, monitoring, and tracking.The photo below is an example of a project tracking database Interwest developed for a client. Prolerts •• • 1. n,...,. ......... cc.rta... a 0.1 Re Dow. • •Mw a•. .... t3 .y. a'' I.`14"C.1.Ott/.a a 44.14 n l.w 74. 1 'Im+.e.� .n.0♦v,.. it Y-a]I!n t0 W41rrn.01 10 404c 044.K.*i..4114404s Ciefor.n NOry4.a.C* 111. 0rw .•..1601) OI444414 41 W_.. L:Z3S&! !4111•.♦4 O4 I^ '.440.4 x.40 Y Iyer«Co.,ens .1 K,r_n.17 01'44011 77 t&1Z r Wbe NC el 1w 1400,4000 km WV.C.* Re,.Ge* 0,A7A017 K,0W011 5at .�V.%-1 LAW 1K 14 1; Cwee a—s Y 14.04 C7..•en me•en.4•4+ Y.74.397 01:630:1 14 r*,f r071I Ebb 4407 I 0 40.ya001r1004 r...acorn.CYuuOs Ne MN Ca m., .44W(Um/ 014JS11 ammo S•j['1l'4011 1 M.4 4 l C 1044 4,.y Y r,rl..:cewl.h ...'i,UI.O L 914'? 01.11.307+ S7444;7AM WM.Pia 44 14.u1bprl*S:1044*+4 114441 • K41Wr10...a e...70Nip 0113•/0751 01/56/310' 7'R.2a::.141} :S 0Ia51an le-ir.y.p4 Fn...•.M 0bv,'300 0S.S/3011 /40B.%11 04 r.ro1>mm1 WIN.1401 44 4Y1yr1a1e..r W7warm Corm. .N 140 Caea0e! •er10NW OVOVNO 00.011017 S10pp;�llEiy' 04-`41410704 ,O Cw8r14..'O'.q olsaw.<o•1+v.11 414.,U,.. 043,(11.? IS OS 70'1 13'cause= 414444 e1 4)4.1.. 00040eC4I4'S* WIem14ra4 Federal Compliance and METRO Quarterly Reporting: Interwest is partnering with G CAP for Federal Compliance, METRO Quarterly Reporting and all other reporting requirements as a result of the funding sources and funding agreements with METRO. Please also refer to the scope outline and tasks attachment located in the Appendix section following the detailed resumes of our proposed G CAP Services team.Additionally Grace Alvarez,PE will coordinate and oversee the work of G CAP Services. METRO and Funding requirement compliance incudes: Adhere to the terms of the METRO funding agreement Coordinate and prepare quarterly reports Adhere to Federal requirements Ensure Labor compliance Public Outreach and Civic Engagement: Interwest is partnering with Arellano Associates to ensure the City of Rosemead is provided with extensive Public Outreach and Engagement services.Arellano Associates will work closely with METRO and City staff to build upon the positive public perception of SGVCOG by engaging the public in the INTERWEST 12 project from the project initiation phase through completion and operation by keeping all parties informed about project progress and upcoming community impacts. Key to this will be emphasizing the benefits people will enjoy when the project is implemented and emphasizing that the inconveniences some may experience during the construction will be few, minor and well worth the community benefits to come. Public outreach services will include: Ensure Access to all stakeholders by proactively addressing language needs of the community Social Media Content Development Create and Maintain Organization/Team Contact Information Create Decision-Making Flow Chart Facilitating Public Workshops, Pop-ups and Neighborhood Meetings Stakeholder Briefings Key marketing and branding opportunities,building community interest in the project Establish Team Member Responsibilities and Duties Engaging stakeholders including elected officials, businesses, property owners,organizations, community groups and neighborhoods affected by the projects Concerns and issues will be identified,and mitigation measures developed Continuing education will be on-going with information presentations to stakeholders, Boards and the public Contribute to overall work schedule and Final Reporting preparation Project Closeout Project Manager,Manuel Gomez,will have a role in overseeing the project closeout.The master project schedule will include the key activities for project closeout: All consultants/contractor contracts will be closed out, including design consultant, and construction manager Environmental permit conditions will be reviewed and completed ROW acquisition activities will be finalized All final invoices will be paid Ensure the construction manager follows through with all terms of the construction contract Ensure Notice of Completion is filed appropriately Ensure the completion of Public Outreach services and Federal Compliance, overseeing the work provided by our subconsultants,Arellano Associates and G CAP Services Quality Assurance / Quality Control For all projects, we will create and apply tailored management systems that work and will carefully monitor program effectiveness, closely tracking work quality, quantity, and cost. Delivering projects under aggressive schedules requires careful management, administration, and oversight of project development teams from inception to completion with committed,complete ownership of all aspects. Despite this approach, some projects may fall behind schedule. If this occurs, Interwest will quickly review the reasons for the delay, identify options for getting the project back on track,and implement the selected option after consulting with the City.Scope,schedule,and budget impacts of the delay will be scrutinized to ensure critical elements are not jeopardized by implementation of the corrective action. , 13 SECTION 2 Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes Our staff is intimately aware of the challenges facing jurisdictions today and we bring a dedication to providing the highest quality municipal service.The familiarity and knowledge gained by working side- by-side with local agency staff,in developing collaborative relationships with community and business stakeholders, and by partnering effectively with state and federal regulatory agencies, delivers successfully completed projects and services,and thoroughly satisfied clients. The organizational structure of our project team is provided below and summaries of qualifications and experience for proposed Interwest staff and subconsultants are provided on the pages that follow.We have also provided the availability of each Interwest staff as specified in the City's RFP. Detailed resumes for all staff proposed for these services are provided in the Appendix section. to, 1�--_,_ KOSEMEAD lnd.l%'.Small (gym n \nu•ric a City of Rosemead I Principal-in-Charge Terry Rod rigue E Project Manager Deputy Project Manager Manuel Gomez Steven L.Wright i Program/Project Design Review Right of Way Management Services Public Kevin Ko Metro/Caltrans r.A Services Outreach/Civic Nicole Jules Coordination/ Brett Paulson Engagement r Robert Eisenbeisz Federal Compliance Samir NuhailyJoseph Mullaney Sub Dan Garcia Arellano Associates Ruth Smith GraceAlvarez , arellano w Roberto Cedillo Sub i associates Oranos Mekwian G CAP Services GICAP SERVICES INTERWEST 14 Interwest is proposing Manuel Gomez to be the Project Manager of the Project Management Services for the City of Rosemead, and Steven L.Wright, PE, TE to be the Deputy Project Manager and Traffic Engineer. Manuel Gomez will be leading the Public Works team while managing our service lines and staff resources for the City. Manuel will also be responsible for overall coordination and management of the contract. Manuel Gomez Senior Project Manager Education: BS,Civil Engineering Availability: 100% Manuel is an experienced public works professional with more than 25 years of experience serving municipal public works departments in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Orange County. Before joining Interwest, he was the Director of Public Works for the City of Irvine for 13 years and held several management positions with the City of Santa Ana over the course of another 13 years. These positions have given Manuel not only valuable insight into the successful management of municipal public works departments and staff, but also intimate understanding of local government standards, regulations, and community sensitive issues. Manuel is known for his collaborative and inclusive management style, bringing the best out in the staff that he supervises. He is proficient in state and local laws and practices,active in industry associations,and fluent in Spanish. Senior Project Manager for Various Projects,Southern California Public Works Director,City of Irvine,CA Transportation Manager,City of Santa Ana,CA The Sand Canyon Avenue and Jeffrey Road Grade Separations These projects were constructed in partnership and close coordination with OCTA, Metrolink, and numerous utility companies with combined project budgets of approximately$115 million.The scope of these complex projects included construction of new triple track railroad bridges and a separate bicycle and pedestrian bridge traversing over two major arterial roadways. Manuel and his staff also managed the implementation of the project's community communications plans and significant construction detours. Jamboree/I-405 Interchange Widening This $15 million project provided for the realignment and widening of the Jamboree/I-5 Freeway Interchange.Working directly with Caltrans, OCTA and the City of Tustin, Manuel directed the project design, right-of-way acquisition and construction phases. The project was constructed in multiple phases requiring significant coordination with Caltrans and adjacent businesses to ensure public access impacts were kept to a minimum. The following illustrates freeway projects and major assignments Manuel has worked on: 1-215 Freeway/Harley Knox Boulevard Interchange INTERWEST 15 City of Laguna Beach Interim Public Works Director SR-133 Freeway/El Toro Road Widening SR-1 Coast Highway Culvert Replacement City of Grand Terrace Project Manager Commerce Way Right of Way Acquisition and Project Development City of Irvine Public Works Director SR-55 Freeway/Alton Avenue Overpass SR-133 Freeway/Trabuco Road Interchange 1-5 Freeway/Jamboree Road Interchange Widening and Reconstruction Sand Canyon Avenue/Metrolink Grade Separation at 1-5 Freeway 1-405 Freeway/Jeffrey Road Widening and New Freeway Bicycle Bridge I-5/SR-55 Interchange Reconstruction 1-5 Freeway Widening City of Maywood Senior Project Manager/Interim Public Works Director City representative for Gateway Cities COG Public Works Officers Group Capital Improvement Program Implementation Steven L. Wright, PE, TE Deputy Project Manager &Traffic Engineer Education: BS,Civil Engineering,Cal State Polytechnic University, Pomona Availability:50% Steven L.Wright, PE,TE, is a professional Civil and Traffic Engineer, licensed in the State of California with more than 30 years of relevant experience. While he has served clients throughout Southern California, his career has been focused on serving communities in Los Angeles County. Before joining Interwest, Steven served the City of Pasadena for more than 28 years, holding titles including City Engineer,Assistant City Engineer,and Transportation Administrator.Now as an Interwest employee,he has provided project and construction management services to the Cities of Maywood, Rancho Palos Verdes, Lomita, Gardena, and South Pasadena. Steven is not only extremely familiar with Greenbook and Caltrans standards for project delivery; he also has in-depth experience with their application locally. His decades of local experience have made him an ideal candidate to anticipate and address the unique challenges faced by the City and your community. Steven has a clear understanding of project scheduling, best construction practices,and the caliber of communication, both with City staff and interdepartmentally, required for the successful delivery of Capital Improvement Projects. Experience: City of Pasadena I Route 210 Soundwalls:The project consisted of the construction of soundwalls to mitigate existing freeway noise levels along the Route 210 Freeway. It was performed in two phases costing $23.2M and $17M respectively. Funds for the project were derived from Metropolitan 16 Transportation Authority Funds, SAFTEA-LU funds, and Gas Tax money. Phase I consisted of the construction of soundwalls between Fair Oaks Avenue and Wilson Avenue,and Phase II the construction of soundwalls along the northern portion between Orange Grove Blvd. and Arroyo Blvd./Windsor Ave. The project was completed in 2016. Steven was the Assistant City Engineer responsible for the design of the project as well as construction oversight. City of Pasadena Traffic Signal Improvements at Pasadena Avenue and Walnut Street (I 210 Freeway westbound onramp): This Highway Safety Improvement Grant funded project provided for intersection safety enhancements by improving traffic signal indications in all directions, installing advance warning beacons,rewiring the intersection,and controller cabinet upgrades.The intersection in question had had a higher than average broadside collision history in the previous 10 years that various mitigation efforts,including traffic light synchronization,running the intersection in a fixed time mode, and installation of additional traffic signal indications, had failed to remedy. Design was completed in 2013 and the construction was completed in 2016. Steven was the City Engineer responsible for the design of the project as well as construction oversight. City of Pasadena I Left Turn Signal Phasing at Colorado Boulevard and Orange Grove Boulevard and Holly Street and Orange Grove Boulevard:Through a protected left turn warrants analysis,the City identified the intersections of Colorado Blvd.and Orange Grove Blvd.,and Orange Grove Blvd.and Holly Street as candidates for protected/permissive left turns based on left turn delay and collision history. The project involved the installation of left-turn traffic phases at these two intersections and cost $253,000 the majority of which was funded by Highway Safety Improvement Grant funds. Construction was completed in 2017. Steven was the City Engineer responsible for the design of the project as well as construction oversight. City of Pasadena I La Loma Bridge Rehabilitation This project provided for the rehabilitation of the La Loma Road Bridge spanning the Arroyo Seco. Rehab included seismic retrofitting, repair of deteriorated and damaged surfaces,and replication of the historical lighting and bridge rail features. It also included the construction of a pedestrian bridge below at trail level to provide a direct link between trails on the east and west of the County flood control channel. Construction was completed in 2017 and was funded in part by$13,013,910 in Highway Bridge Program funds.Steven was the City Engineer responsible for the design of the project as well as construction oversight. City of Pasadena I Holly Street Bridge Rehabilitation: This project began construction in 2015 and consisted of a seismic retrofit of the Holly Street Bridge in the City of Pasadena.The project was funded by a Highway Bridge Program grant in the amount of$7,525,050 with a local match of $974,950 for a total project value of$8,500,000.Steven was the City Engineer responsible for preliminary engineering oversight. City of Lomita i intersection Improvement Projects at Pacific Highway (SR-1) / Walnut Street and Western Avenue (SR-213) / Palos Verdes Drive North: The City retained Interwest to provide a constructability review and construction management services for this project that was completed in May 2019. These projects were undertaken in order to ensure the safe operation of the mentioned intersections. Areas of construction include channelization, striping, traffic signals and lighting upgrades, curb, gutter, and sidewalk repairs, ADA curb ramp construction, installation of signs, markings,delineation, intersection detection system and construction of PCC bus pads. Steven acted 17 as Project Manager and Resident Engineer,providing construction oversight throughout the project life. The project was funded by Measure R funds and project value was$1.5M. In addition to the highlighted projects above,the following illustrates projects Steven has worked on in Los Angeles County. City of El Monte Program Management 2019-2021 Project and Program Management support for various Capital Improvement Projects City of Maywood Engineer of Record/Resident Engineer 2018 Street Resurfacing Project 2018 Maywood Park Demolition of Bellfield Facilities City of South Pasadena Program Management/Resident Engineer 2018 War Memorial Building Improvement Project 2018 Fire Department Emergency Operations Center Upgrades City of Lomita Resident Engineer 2017/18 Traffic Signal Upgrades(2 intersections) (Metro Funded) City of Rancho Palos Verdes Resident Engineer 2017 Hawthorne Boulevard Pedestrian Linkage Project(Federally Funded) 2017 Slurry Seal Project 2017/18 Storm Drain Repairs Project City of Pasadena Engineer of Record/Resident Engineer 2016 Traffic Signal Improvements at Pasadena Avenue and Walnut Street(Federally Funded) 2016 Traffic Signal Upgrades at Colorado Boulevard and Orange Grove and Holly Street and Orange Grove Boulevard (Federally Funded) 2016 Traffic Signal Upgrades at Colorado Boulevard and Orange Grove and Holly Street and Orange Grove Boulevard (Federally Funded) 2016 Traffic Signal Improvements at Pasadena Avenue and Walnut Street(Federally Funded) 2015 Sewer Pump Station Upgrades on Rosemont Avenue 2010-2012 Installation/Replacement of Guardrails 2010 Walnut Street Improvements(Street Lighting,Traffic Signals,Sidewalks, Median Island,Street Reconstruction,Curb and Gutter) 2015 Sewer Pump Station Upgrades on Rosemont Avenue 2014 La Loma Bridge Retrofit(Federally Funded) 2013 Walnut Street Improvements(Street Lighting,Traffic Signals,Sidewalks, Median Island,Street Reconstruction,Curb and Gutter) INTERWEST 18 Support Personnel Program/Project Management Services Robert Eisenbeisz, PE Senior Engineer, QA/QC Robert is a California Registered Civil Engineer with 35 years of experience in civil and traffic engineering. Prior to joining Interwest,he served as the Public Works Director and City Engineer for the City of Rialto, where he managed and supervised capital construction projects including street pavement rehabilitations, street widening improvements, park improvements, and building facility improvements. Robert has managed a 5-year CIP Program with an approximate budget of $200M, delivering projects with an overall annual average value of $20 million. Robert also managed Maintenance and Operation services including street maintenance and repairs, park maintenance, building/facility maintenance and fleet services. Availability:40% Samir Nuhaily, PE, TE Transportation Support Engineer Samir is a registered professional Civil and Traffic Engineer in the State of California. He is also a seasoned public works professional and an effective manager, dedicated to delivering successful projects. He has earned both a B.S. and an M.S. degree in Civil Engineering and also holds teaching credentials as an engineering college professor. Samir has extensive experience in the delivery of complex building and infrastructure programs and has held middle, senior, and executive level positions in public and private sector organizations. He has a proven record in leading and managing large teams of managers,architects and engineers to deliver high performances and exceed established targets. Additionally, he possesses an expert level of competence in the design and construction of infrastructure systems and associated utilities,and in transportation planning and traffic engineering. Availability:30% Ruth Smith, TE, PTP Traffic Support Engineer Ruth is an experienced traffic engineer and transportation planner with 40 years of experience. She began her career in the private sector,preparing traffic impact studies,then moved to the public sector as a Senior Traffic Engineer for the City of Santa Ana for 14 years. Ruth then returned to the private sector,where she not only prepared traffic impact studies,but also used her past experience to perform a variety of traffic engineering and transportation planning duties for client cities, including serving as contract City Traffic Engineer.Ruth's wide-ranging and unique experience in both the public and private sectors makes her an asset. Her municipal experience impressed upon her the importance of ensuring that traffic impact studies for private development are correct and complete,and that site access and on-site circulation are fully addressed. Ruth also has a rich background in neighborhood traffic plans, starting with managing the Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan, Speed Hump & Permit Parking programs in the City of Santa Ana,to more recently assisting the Cities of Temecula, Brea, San Marino &Costa Mesa in preparing neighborhood traffic plans to reduce cut-through traffic&speeding. Availability: 50% INTERWEST 19 Oranos Mekwian Administrative Support Oranos is knowledgeable and experienced in chemical and biological processes for industrial purposes. She recently worked with the City of Maywood providing Project Management for Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) and the Federal Clean Water Act. Her expertise includes wastewater/storm water management,street design,and private development. Availability: 50% Roberto Cedillo Engineering Intern Roberto is acquiring essential on-the-job knowledge early on in his engineering career.While working with Interwest, Roberto has worked on the San Jacinto Citywide Signal Timing Upgrades and the City of Port Hueneme Citywide Speed Survey Update projects. Roberto communicates effectively in English and Spanish and has strong attention to detail. Availability:75% Kevin KO, PE, QSD Design and Construction Oversight Kevin is a registered Civil Engineer and certified Qualified SWPPP Developer with multiple years of experience providing civil engineering services to clients in Southern California. His experience includes civil design for drainage, grading, storm water quality, and utility projects as well as construction management on a number of capital projects such as street improvements,sewer improvements,and park improvements. Kevin provides excellent customer service and completes tasks in an accurate, timely, and friendly manner. Kevin has also provided plan review on development projects and undertaken preliminary engineering studies to address infrastructure issues. Availability: 50% Nicole Jules, PE Traffic Support Engineer Nicole has over 25 years of progressive professional experience and a results-oriented track record.She has managed a variety of complex, controversial public works improvement projects in both private and public employment. Nicole's experience includes traffic signal design and construction,geometric design,traffic impact studies,traffic circulation and parking analyses,construction staging, and traffic control plan design.Additionally,she is proficient in roadway design,curb,gutter,sidewalk and median design, precise grading and storm drain facilities. Availability: 25% INTERWEST 20 Joseph Mullaney, EIT Associate Engineer Joseph possesses years of experience providing civil engineering services in the public arena working with various municipalities. He has extensive experience in design, investigation, managing small projects and coordination of fiber optic systems and is familiar with FTTP design regulations. He is known for his ability to efficiently multi-task on projects providing our clients with a broad range of services. Currently he is serving in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes managing their wireless telecommunications application process. Availability: 50% Metro/Caltrans Coordination/Federal Compliar Dan Garcia, PE, REA, CPP Senior Engineer— Federal Compliance/Caltrans Liaison Dan is a licensed civil engineer with extensive city engineering and project management experience. He has served in senior and executive management public works positions with the cities of Maywood, Costa Mesa, Norwalk, El Segundo, Solvang, Culver City and Novato. Daniel brings to each project experience and expertise in the areas of Capital Improvement Program management, Private Development, Grading, Parks and Land Use, Water Resources and Transportation Planning. City Engineer in Norwalk, Dan was responsible for the 1-5 Widening coordination with Caltrans and the City, as well as managing the design of the Firestone Bridge over the San Gabriel River and for obtaining the Caltrans E-76 for construction of that$24 million project. Availability: 50% Grace Alvarez, PE Planning and Programming Manager Grace is a seasoned Planning and Programming Manager with more than 32 years of municipal experience and a passion for public service.Over her career,she has served the County of Riverside and the City of San Jacinto and acted as a consultant, providing her with the unique opportunity to see municipal processes from multiple perspectives, as a City, County and private employee. Grace has cultivated years of expertise in transportation planning and programming and is knowledgeable of all applicable state and federal requirements and processes,as well as local concerns and considerations for transportation projects. She has a solid track record of successfully delivering projects, procuring grant funding,and addressing problems,and is bilingual in English and Spanish. Availability: 60% Brett Paulson, SR/WA, R/W-RAC, R/W-NAC Right of Way Manager With more than 25 years of experience in privately and publicly financed projects, Brett Paulson is an expert in planning, managing and coordinating all aspects of right of way projects, including: site selection, licensing, acquisition, relocation, condemnation support, property management and demolition. He is highly efficient in developing metrics for measuring performance and ensuring agents INTERWEST 21 execute work plans, initiatives, strategies, processes and procedures. Having taken 23 International Right of Way Association disciplinary courses, Brett is very experienced with the application of federal regulations and guidelines associated with acquisition, relocation assistance and management of real property for public entities. He routinely undertakes public works projects requiring total compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970,as amended, California local and state requirements,Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration. Availability: 100% Subconsultant Biographies Interwest has provided short biographies of key personnel from our subconsultant teams. Please refer to the following: Chester K. Britt Executive Vice President Chester K. Britt serves as the Executive Vice President for Arellano Associates. With 30 years of experience,Chester has managed diverse communications and planning programs for numerous large- scale and high-profile transportation projects across all phases of project development,including long- range planning, feasibility studies, alternatives analysis, environmental studies, final design and engineering and construction.His experience covers Southern California as well as statewide programs. Chester's project experience has focused on working with clients on strategic decision-making,creative outreach applications and issue resolution. Specifically, through the course of his project experience, he has come to understand the issues and challenges of cities and public agencies and has become an expert in providing strategic counsel on communications programs throughout the project development process. Chester's experience allows him to analyze the nuances and complexities of projects and develop approaches and solutions that provide positive results. Availability:To be determined GCAP Services Sylvia Linn Vice President & Labor Compliance Director Ms. Linn has extensive experience in labor compliance monitoring, analysis, audits, and implementation of compliance-related processes for public sector agencies.She possesses an in-depth, practical knowledge of the regulatory environment, assessment of operational risks and developing risk mitigation procedures. Ms. Linn is well versed in the tools and resources to enhance monitoring efficiency and works extensively with the cutting-edge technology to streamline the process and reduce risk of error. Ms. Linn's current responsibilities with GCAP Services as the Director of Compliance Relations include payroll/wage determination analysis,and labor compliance monitoring and audits. Availability:To be determined 22 SECTION 3 Company Qualifications A _ ' Z •- .Y .4111/: C:') Noll •'• :'S Illi~,. • • {• { y� A + ��i 'R}-may C• % , Ata, „ak ,ist P /_ i�l The seamless integration of municipal service professionals in support of public agencies has been our purpose since Interwestformed in 2002.Interwestwasfounded by individuals with a passion for serving municipalities. We currently employ nearly 500 employees spanning a multitude of disciplines within public works and building and safety departments throughout California.We currently serve over 200 cities, counties, and state agencies across southern California. We provide the following services to cities/counties: Municipal Engineering Geographic Information System (GIS) Construction Management&Inspection Information Technology(IT) Traffic Engineering City Planning Building Safety Emergency Management Organization Leadership&Development Water Policy and Planning Real Estate&Right of Way Acquisition Our staff has held senior and executive management positions within numerous California cities and public agencies,including the titles of City Engineer,Public Works Director,Construction Manager,and other management personnel.This depth of experience brings a high level of expertise and sensitivity towards community and special interest group issues. We value the importance of a focus that represents the interests of our public agency clients and reflects positively on the citizens they serve. We furnish both technical excellence and a thorough understanding of the regulatory process to assist our clients through the sometimes-daunting complexities associated with the delivery of projects, implementation of important public programs,and adoption of significant public policy. We have extensive experience providing the requested services to other local municipalities like the City of Rosemead within the same region, and beyond. Our references will attest to our proven ability to 23 deliver in complex municipal environments, and our well-qualified staff to meet and exceed the goals set for the assigned projects. Fxperienc:e n Southern California: Interwest has had the privilege to serve several municipalities throughout Southern California.Our staff's local experience has given them valuable insight into the unique concerns of the area, familiarity with all relevant local standards and regulations, and relationships with the community and local agencies, including Caltrans. ::. Small Firm Focus, Large Firm Resources: Our primary focus is providing turnkey staff augmentation services to California municipal clients. Unlike many of our competitors - either too small to provide a full range of dedicated services,or too large and dispersed to provide a local focus-Interwest is a full-service organization with the resources to provide any and all of the expertise required and the ability to scale our services to the City's changing needs. A Wealth of Res Our staff has served as municipal employees, often in management roles,so we understand how the system works from the inside out. For the same reason,our staff understands how to manage projects while representing the City's goals responsibly and respecting budgetary and time limitations. By design,our staff is comprised of professionals with extensive experience working directly for public agencies. Our staff will ensure conformance with Federal, State and City statues, regulations, ordinances, guidelines, applicable standards, specifications, plans, laws, and accepted standard construction practices. We are confident that our team is exceedingly qualified to partner with the City of Rosemead in ensuring the successful delivery of Project Management services in your community. Interwest is currently providing Building Plan Review and Inspection Safety services for the Community Development Department and has been since May 2018.Since that time,we have also provided IT and Engineering services to the City,increasing our familiarity with your community and its departments. As a leading municipal service of professionals in support of public agencies,Interwest has the staff and support to provide and aid the City with various public works projects like road reconstruction and widening, bridge rehabilitation, bike/pedestrian paths, traffic signal design, traffic calming, water treatment and distribution systems,sewer and storm drain systems and improvements to City facilities, and any other additional tasks such as right-of-way vacations, permit inspections, traffic survey requests and census, Enterprise GIS development and implementation, GIS data collection and mapping of City's infrastructure, as well as IT services including strategic planning and much more— Interwest can do it all! INTERWEST 24 Interwest is partnering with Arellano Associates to provide extensive Pubic Outreach and Engagement services. Arellano Associates (AA) is Southern California's premier public outreach and high-tech communications firm focused on stakeholder engagement in the public sector. AA understands the diverse needs of our neighbors,communities,and region and leverages the latest tools and grassroots techniques to successfully achieve client objectives. Since their founding in 1994,their work has been driven by a devotion to public service and a desire to bridge the gap between public programs and the communities they serve.Contact information is as follows: Chester K.Britt, Executive Vice President,Arellano Associates 5851 Pine Avenue,Suite A,Chino Hills,CA 91709 909.627.2974 www.arellanoassociates.com Secvices Interwest is partnering with GCAP Services to provide extensive Federal Compliance Services. As an industry leader for the past 20 years, GCAP has been providing innovative solutions to their clients. GCAP is a leader in designing,implementing and overseeing alternative delivery project DBE programs, including developing and overseeing the first Construction Manager/General Contractor mega project in California. GCAP Services innovations include developing a Blog specifically dedicated to DBE Compliance and developing a web-based Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)training module for the California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and California local agencies. Contact information is as follows: Sylvia Linn,Vice President,GCAP Services 3525 Hyland Avenue,Suite 140,Costa Mesa,CA 92626 T 714.800.1795 Cell 714.318-2061 www.gcapservices.com Highlighted METRO projects include: Roof Replacement Project at Metro Divisions 11 and 22 Completed:October 2020 Description of Services: Labor compliance monitoring services: review certified payroll reports, Apprentice forms and ratios, fringe benefit review/audit; reconcile training fund contributions, and conduct jobsite interviews. Division 18 Bus Washer#1 Replacement Completed:June 2020 Description of Services: Labor compliance monitoring services: review certified payroll reports, Apprentice forms and ratios, fringe benefit review/audit; reconcile training fund contributions, and conduct jobsite interviews. INTERWEST 25 Metro HQ Fire Pump Equipment Replacement Completed:June 2020 Description of Services: Labor compliance monitoring services: review certified payroll reports, Apprentice forms and ratios, fringe benefit review/audit; reconcile training fund contributions, and conduct jobsite interviews. METRO Projects (Ongoing): Westside Subway Extension(Purple Line) Estimated Completion:August 2023 Description of Services: Labor compliance monitoring services: review certified payroll reports, Apprentice forms and ratios, fringe benefit review/audit; reconcile training fund contributions, and conduct jobsite interviews. Sound Wall#11 Construction Estimated Completion: March 2022 Description of Services: Labor compliance monitoring services: review certified payroll reports, Apprentice forms and ratios, fringe benefit review/audit; reconcile training fund contributions, and conduct jobsite interviews. Similar Services Provided to Interwest Clients City of Rosemead Client Address: 8838 E Valley Blvd, Rosemead,CA 91770 Dates of Work:2017-Ongoing Contact:Angelica Frausto-Lupo, Director of Community Development 1626.569.22611 afrausto-Lupo@cityofrosemead.org In January 2017,Interwest began providing IT services to the City of Rosemead,including in-house Help Desk services. In becoming familiar with the City and its community,we recognized the need for staff augmentation and assistance in several other municipal departments. By May of 2018,we were awarded a contract to provide full-service Building Safety services to the City, including a Building Official, inspection and permit counter staff, and on-site and offsite plan review professionals. Since then, we have expanded our services to also include Interim Director of Public Works Services, as well as construction inspection and project management in the City's Public Works Department.We currently provide Building Official, Building Plan Review, Building Inspection, Permit Technician,Front Counter Support,IT Services,Interim Public Works Director,Construction Inspection, Project Management and Engineering Plan Review Services. INTERWEST 26 City of Costa Mesa Client Address 77 Fair Drive,Costa Mesa CA 92626 Dates of Work:2016-Ongoing Contact Jennifer Rosales,Transportation Services Manager 1 714.754.5180, jennifer.rosales@costamesaca.gov __ Highlighted Projects: 1-405 Widening Project: Services Interwest has provided in connection with the 1-405 Improvement ,i ... Project include: Project Management services and -7' ` -41117- oversight on behalf of the City of Costa Mesa. Services -" 1= _ _ include: Review design drawing and plan check of 1-405 • corridor improvements including impacts to adjacent local streets, rights of way impacts, interchanges, and utilities such as sewer, water and storm drains at current design stage level; Review of traffic control plans for subsurface explorations; Coordination with OCTA and the consultant _ Parsons regarding project submittals, traffic signal timing -- — plans and corresponding review responses delivery; -- I Review of plans against current water quality standards within the City jurisdiction; and coordinating meetings with the Design/Build team for project coordination. Arlington Drive Improvements, Measure M OCTA and Storm Channel Improvement Project: This was a project funded by multiple sources including OCTA and Drainage Improvement funds, which required continuous -_ documentation and adherence with OCTA procedures.This project consisted of reducing the potential for major storm damage within the areas west of Newport Boulevard and Arlington Drive behind the Orange County Fairgrounds. ' Construction included a complete increase in storm drain sizing followed by the construction of a bio-swale for low flows and the reduction of �`- pavement through Arlington Drive to a length of 4,800 lineal feet. Additionally, a multi-purpose, bike/pedestrian and skating recreational trail was constructed meandering along the bio-swale south of Arlington Drive,and safety-lit crossings were added to protect pedestrian traffic between the existing schools and a park north of the street crossing to the fairgrounds on the south side. Aesthetically pleasing landscaping along the project length was another positive addition to the affected area.Tasks included finalizing the plans and specifications for bidding purposes, advertising for bids, and administratively presenting the project to the City Council for award. Interwest provided continuous project management and inspection throughout the project duration.We also reviewed and approved project submittals, interfaced with the public, prepared progress payments to the contractor, and INTERWEST 27 coordinated with the funding agencies.The Project cost$4.3M. Construction began in November 2017 and was completed in June 2018. East 19th Street, Safe Route to School Project from Church Street to Irvine Ave:This federally funded project required continuous documentation and strict compliance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Program Guidelines Manual.Tasks performed by Interwest staff included finalizing the plans and specifications for bidding purposes, advertising for bids, accepting the bids, and administratively presenting the project to the City Council for award of project to the successful bidder. The Interwest team provided the continuous project management and inspections from the beginning of work through project completion and audit. Implied tasks also included the review and approval of project submittals,providing information and updates to the public,preparation of progress payments to the contractor, and continuous coordination with the funding agency. The East 19th Street project was a 4,700 lineal foot street traffic calming project with a total of 7 intersections. Each intersection had bulb-outs at all corners, reducing the street widths to one lane in each direction, which effectively reduced the traffic speed for the entire segment-thus providing traffic calming. Each of the bulb-outs included landscaping and irrigation to support the plant palette. Each intersection was also repaved after grinding to create acceptable grades. Monuments and supporting lighting were also provided for this segment as well as improved traffic striping to accommodate the sharing of the street with bicycles. This project cost$1.6M.Construction began in April 2017 and was completed February 2018. City of Perris Client Address: 135 N D Street, Perris,CA 92570 Dates of Work: 2018-Ongoing Contact Richard Belmudez,City Manager I 951.943.6100 I rbelmudez@cityofperris.org I-215/Harley Knox Boulevard Interchange Project Interwest is providing complete project management services for the 1-215/Harley Knox Boulevard Interchange including: cooperative agreement with Caltrans for the PA&ED,design,and right of way;seeking financial contributions from local, regional, state, and federal agencies; preparing Request for Proposal (RFP) for Project Approval and Environmental Document(PA/ED),and selection of preferred alternative;and manage the work of consultants for PA/ED through CEQA/NEPA certification. To improve traffic flow and safety within the I-215/Harley Knox Boulevard interchange,the City of Perris in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is proposing to upgrade and reconfigure the interchange. There are three interchange alternatives under study and include a Tight Diamond Interchange (TDI), Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI),Single Point Intersection,and No Build. The purpose of the project is to plan for the projected regional population growth and increase in travel demand at the existing I-215/Harvey Knox Boulevard interchange for the year 2045. Currently, high traffic volumes create severe congestion throughout the interchange area during peak hours. The interchange requires capacity enhancements to alleviate congestion and accommodate future travel demands. On June 5, 2018, City of Perris requested Caltrans to initiate and prepare a Project Initiation Document(PID) aka Project Study Report- Project Development Support(PSR-PDS). On May 8,2019,Caltrans accepted to initiate the PSR-PDS under agreement with the City.The PSR-PDS is a pre-requisite for state highway projects prior to start the PA&ED phase.The Project Study Report- Project Development Support is underway; the draft PSR-PDS is under review by the City Perris, Riverside County,and RCTC.The PSR-PDS includes the following components: 28 Project need and purpose Project Alternatives/scope of work Anticipated right-of-way requirements Preliminary environmental analysis Estimated costs Risk Assessment Schedule Potential funding sources The PSR/PSR will become an attachment to PID and is anticipated to be completed in early 2021. City of Yorba Linda Client Addre 4845 Casa Loma Avenue,Yorba Linda,CA 92885 fates of Work:2013-Ongoing Contact Rick Yee,Assistant City Engineer1714.961.71701ryee@yorbalindaca.gov Yorba Linda Boulevard Rehabilitation: This project consisted of grinding the existing pavement and replacing it with new asphalt concrete pavement as well as restriping over roadway and adjusting the utility boxes. This was an important and high-visibility project for the City because the site is a traffic-heavy arterial adjacent to one of Yorba Linda's busiest shopping centers. During pre- construction meetings and in speaking with local business-owners while handing out notifications, Interwest determined that a majority of the grind and overlay should be performed at night in order to minimize the impact on businesses and the traveling public.We were able to negotiate with contractor to eliminate additional costs for the night work,ensuring that the project was completed within budget ($600,000) while satisfying business owners and the general public. This project began and was completed in 2013. City of San Juan Capistrano 1 Client Addres 32400 Paseo Adelanto,San Juan Capistrano, Dates of Work:2018-Ongoing CA 92675 Contact.Tom Toman,Assistant Public Works Director 1 714.493.1171 1 ttoman@sanjuancapistrano.org 1-5 La-Novia Roundabout Project: This project consisted of converting a stop-controlled freeway 44 '0-7,40V-0CA offramp to a fully operational roundabout offset the - I-5 freeway in the City of San Juan Capistrano. Interwest Consulting Group managed this project on behalf of the City of San Juan Capistrano. This s► 1 � Federally funded project involved extensive _ =_ __ coordination between the City, Caltrans and Stakeholders. The project resulted in being �, 0. highlighted in a publication by the Federal Highway "" "� '" , ' ' Administration on the benefits of roundabout intersections. INTERWEST 29 SECTION 4 References City of Costa Mesa Client Address:77 Fair Drive,Costa Mesa CA 92626 Dates of Work:2016-Ongoing Contact Jennifer Rosales,Transportation Services Manager 714.754.5180 ljennifer.rosales@costamesaca.gov Interwest staff has provided a number of recent Engineering Plan Check and Traffic Engineering Plan Check services to the City of Costa Mesa,as well as Construction Management and Inspection services. City of Brea Client Address: 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea,CA 92821 Dates of Work:2019-Ongoing Contact Michael Ho, Deputy Director of Public Works 1714.990.76571 michaelh@ci.brea.ca.us Interwest staff have provided project management, Design-RFP Oversight,reviewing PS&E documents, assisting with bid and award Phase,budget and schedule tracking,billing/invoicing. City of Perris Client Address: 135 N D Street, Perris,CA 92570 2018-Ongoing Contact Richard Belmudez,City Manager 1951.943.61001 rbelmudez@cityofperris.org Interwest provides Engineering Plan Check services, Construction Management and Inspection Services, Capital Improvement Program Management and design services, and is City Engineer to the City of Perris. In addition to Engineering related services, we provide the City planning services and building safety plan review services. City of San Juan Capistrano Client Address: 32400 Paseo Adelanto,San Juan Capistrano, Dates of Work:2018-Ongoing CA 92675 Tom Toman,Assistant Public Works Director I 714.493.1171 ttoman@sanjuancapistrano.org Interwest provides the following services to the City: City Engineering, Traffic Engineering, Project Management,Construction Management. City of Eastvale 12363 Limonite Ave,Suite 910, Eastvale CA, Dates of Work:2018-Ongoing 91752 Michele Nissen, Former City Manager 1 951.549.0029 1 michelegnissen@icloud.com Since July 1, 2010, Interwest has created and implemented the following: City Engineering, Development Engineering and Entitlements, Transportation Planning, Traffic Engineering Services, Building Department Administration,Building and Safety Code Compliance,Plan Review&Inspections, Drainage Engineering,Geographic Information Systems,&Real Estate Acquisitions Services. INTERWEST 30 SECTION 5 Standard Draft Professional Services Agreement & Insurance Requirements Interwest Consulting Group has reviewed the terms and conditions identified in the City of Rosemead's Professional Services Agreement,as well as the Insurance Requirements. Interwest does not have any comments that we would like the City to consider, nor any issues or exceptions and would enter such agreement if awarded a contract. sit . ii,40,.., . • , .. K.H' . , ` µ .. .6rF. • 4Y ' .. r "` ice. tiet 4 i • ,, �. ,, 7 r , L .....,__ . , r ..0-4.0. - 4 4 tt 31 SECTION 6 Addenda Acknowledgement Interwest has crafted our proposal based on the City's requirements reflected in its RFP. Interwest acknowledges that the City has not submitted addendums for RFP No.2020-11. Fee Schedule In compliance with the City's RFP, Interwest has provided our fee schedule in a separate sealed envelope. Appendix On the following pages, Interwest has provided the City with detailed resumes of our proposed team and subconsultants. Included are additional tasks to be provided by Arellano Associates and G CAP Services. INTERWEST 32 APPENDIX Team Resumes: Interwest Terry Rodrigue, PE, TE PRESIDENT /1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Terry has over 35 years of experience in City Engineering,City Traffic Engineering, public works,operations,design and special district financing.He provides technical and strategic assistance and support to city managers,elected officials,and the community on public I N T E R W E S 7 works programs,policies and activities,and projects. He has successfully negotiated and resolved sensitive,political,and controversial program,policy,staffing,and project issues. Years of Experience:50 His approach is to ensure he is meeting the needs of the client in the most effective and efficient way possible and to work with individual communities and to focus on what is possible through creativity,expertise and relationships. MBA,University of Southern California,1989 BUSINESS HISTORY BS,University of Maine,Civil Engineering,1980 Interwest Consulting Group/2002-Present In 2002,Terry founded Interwest Consulting Group,a company dedicated to providing a CA Registered Civil Engineer, variety of services to local, State and Federal Government Agencies. Since that time,the 38694 company has grown to over 500 professionals and support staff providing services in the CA Registered Traffic Engineer, Western United States. T1497 COPROFESSIONAL HISTORY 30 9egisteredCivilEngineer, 30697 Director,Community Services&Director of Public Works/City of Rancho Palos Verdes ;�,f cy,:; Terry was appointed interim Director for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes on two separate American Society of Civil occasions. In both instances, this was to fill a staff vacancy on the City's Executive Engineers Management Team. The first assignment was as Director of Community Development Institute of Transportation which consisted of planning, building, code enforcement and view preservation. The Engineers second assignment was as the Director of Public Works which included the City's 6, Engineering and Public Works Divisions. In both assignments,Terry reported to the City City Transitions Strategic Manager and represented the Department at City Council and Planning Commission Operations meetings. Terry provided leadership, overall direction and mentoring to Staff while City Engineering assisting the City in recruiting a permanent Director. Public Works Operations City Traffic Engineering Interim City Engineer/City of Santa Ana Funding Districts Terry served as Interim City Engineer for the City of Santa Ana while the City conducted a Transportation Systems national search for a permanent City Engineer.The Engineering Department is responsible for the planning,design and construction of all public infrastructure for this City of 335,000 people.The Engineering Department has a capital budget of$40 Million. City Engineer/City of Bell Terry Interwest supported the city of Bell for over 5 years following the scandal that removed the then existing City Council.Working with the Interim and then Permanent City Manager,we played an important role in the City's recovery story.We began working with the city in December 2011,providing engineering services,which included managing all the City's engineering,project management,traffic and construction management.We worked closely with other departments as a team to help complete solid economic development opportunities that helped bring the City into solvency.We also worked with regional and state agencies to obtain nearly$100 Million in grants for City infrastructure and complete programs such as the Sanitary Sewer Management Plan to bring the City into compliance as they were under notice of violation,as well as implemented an ADA Transition Plan to lower the City's risk profile. Director of Public Services/City of Lincoln As the Director of Public Works for the City of Lincoln,managed the daily operations of the following functions: INTERWEST TERRY RODRIGUE, PE, TE - PRESIDENT I CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Engineering - including environmental permitting, GIS, Capital Project Development and implementation and development plan review Wastewater Treatment-A 4MGD tertiary wastewater treatment plan Wastewater Collection-A complete wastewater collection system. Water Distribution-Tanks,reservoirs wells and a complete distribution system for the community water supply Streets-Maintenance and management of 250 miles of streets including signals,signing and stripping and sidewalks Parks/Open Space/Facilities-Maintenance and operation of all city parks,open space and facilities Transit-A local fixed route and Dial-a-Ride system. Solid Waste-Residential/Commercial solid waste collection/recycling program Airport-Operation and maintenance of municipal airport Construction Management-Managing and inspecting all public infrastructure construction. Worked as part of the City's executive management team to develop and implement a long-term staffing and reorganization plan and improve customer services.Assisted in resolving major outstanding claims and issues on several private development projects. Negotiated extensively with large land development entities.Worked with a multitude of funding sources including stimulus funding grants. Principal-in-Charge of the successful transition of public works, planning,building and safety,and code enforcement services from the County of Riverside to the City of Wildomar. Transfer of Services-The team, together with key Riverside County staff, developed detailed processes, protocols, delivery methods,and agreements necessary to accomplish the seamless and cooperative transfer of services. Management Systems-Developed and implemented management systems to monitor and track activities associated with planning and development entitlement reviews,engineering and building plan reviews,code enforcement cases, and street maintenance works orders. Budgets-Created fiscally prudent and conservative operating and capital improvement budgets based upon available funding sources and revenues. Departments - Oversaw and responsible for all aspects of public works, planning, building and safety, and code enforcement. Ed Erreering&tau ,<9i /C'iv of Elk Garr, As the Manager of Engineering and Building for the City of Elk Grove,transitioned all Public Works and Building Department Services from Sacramento County to the City of Elk Grove.Built a staff of 60 people within 9 months and led the transition of the following services from Sacramento County: Public Works Plan Checking Special Districts Transportation Public Counter Operations Public Works Inspection All Building Department Operations Street Maintenance Capital Projects Permit Issuance Contract City Engineer/City of Westlake Village As Contract City Engineer for the City of Westlake Village,prepared capital programs for improvements to City-owned facilities; supervised the preparation of plans,specifications and bidding; monitored the construction of capital projects; responded to citizen inquiries,reviewed development proposals and made presentations to City Council and citizen groups. City Traffic Engineer/Various Cities in California Terry has served as Contract City Traffic Engineerforthe Cities of Malibu,Rolling Hills Estates,Thousand Oaks,and Moreno Valley. In this capacity,he performed a variety of traffic investigations requested by citizens and City Council,reviewed developer plans and studies,developed and implemented traffic safety programs and policies,conducted traffic analyses and studies,and made presentations to traffic commissions,City Councils and citizens groups. INTERWEST Manuel Gomez 4110 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER Manuel is an experienced public works professional with more than 25 years of experience serving municipal public works departments in Orange County.Before joining Interwest, he was the Director of Public Works for the City of Irvine for 13 I N T E R W E S T years and held several management positions with the City of Santa Ana over the course of another 13 years.These positions have given Manuel not only valuable Years of Experience:28 Years w/Interwest:2 insight into the successful management of municipal public works departments and staff, but also intimate understanding of Orange County communities, Education standards,regulations,and sensitive issues.Manuel is known for his collaborative B.S.Civil Engineering, and inclusive management style, bringing the best out in the staff that he California State University, supervises.He is proficient in state and local laws and practices,active in industry Long Beach associations,and fluent in Spanish. APWA Southern California PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Chapter,Member Senior Project Manager/Interwest Consulting Group/2018—Present City Engineers of Orange Manuel provides project management for municipal public works projects and County,Board Member oversees assigned projects to ensure compliance with time and budget 2014-2016 OCTA Technical Advisory parameters. He responds to client and public inquiries regarding engineering Committee,Chair 2018 policies and procedures and helps municipal management teams to evaluate issues and options regarding the best approach to and practices for public works projects and programs,as well as key organizational issues. Public Works Director/City of Irvine/2005—2018 As Public Works Director for over a decade,Manuel provided leadership and policy direction for the development, construction and maintenance operations of various public works infrastructure projects and programs.He directed the City's largest operating department with more than 150 full-time staff positions.He also was responsible for an annual operating budget of $65 million and a capital improvement program of more than$450 million. Transportation Manager/City of Santa Ana/1992—2005 Manuel provided oversight and management of the development services and transportation functions of the City's Public Works Agency.He also served as the Manager of Maintenance Services and as Assistant to the City Manager during his tenure with the City of Santa Ana. Steven L. Wright, PE, TE . CA REGIS1EKED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER // CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER IrW Steven is a registered Civil and Traffic Engineer with more than 30 years of experience providing a variety of public works services to municipalities in Southern California.His background demonstrates his exposure to and familiarity I N T E R W E S T with a diverse range of public works disciplines including land development, Years of Experience:30+ capital projects,traffic and special projects such as waste water and storm drain Years w/Interwest:3 systems,undergrounding of utilities,public facilities,and park and median island improvements. Ecsucation r BS,Civil Engineering, PROFESSIONAL HISTORY California State Polytechnic University,Pomona Senior Engineer /Interwest Consulting Group /7017 - Present Steve currently serves clients throughout Southern California in various contract Registrations/Certifications and interim roles. Most recently, he has acted as a Project Manager and Senior CA Registered Civil Advisor in the City of South Pasadena,and a Project and Construction Manager in Engineer,C48650 the Cities of Rancho Palos Verdes,Gardena,Maywood,and Lomita. CA Registered Traffic Engineer,TR1755 City Engineer I Assistant City Engineer I Interim Transportation professional Affiliations Administrator/City of Pasadena /1994 - 2017 • Member-Institute of Steve directed and organized the work of a large and multi-disciplined team Transportation Engineers comprised of the Engineering, Construction, and Public Works Design Divisions. Member-American Public He oversaw, coordinated and supervised the work of engineers, inspectors and Works Association survey staff. Steve managed and supervised programs and activities relating to Member-American Society transit services,parking management and enforcement,transportation planning, of Civil Engineers and traffic engineering.He was responsible for neighborhood traffic planning and Member-City and County analysis; design of signing and striping improvements; review of traffic impact Engineers Association reports for new developments;conditional use permits;and specific and general Speaking Engagements plan efforts.He prepared and administered consultant contracts and a variety of American Public Works reports for city council, commissions and the community. He helped prepare Association Public Works capital and operation budgets, monitor revenue and expenses and maintain Institute May 2015(Downey, fiscally responsible project budgets. Steve was also responsible for the CA) recruitment,selection,training and development of department staff. American Public Works Association Public Works r hide Hilts/1993 - 1994 Institute October2014 Steve's responsibilities included managing public works capital improvement (Downey,CA) and private development projects;the inspection of road repairs and preventative American Institute of maintenance programs; issuing encroachment permits and working the permit Architects August 2011 (Pasadena,CA) counter; performing traffic signal design,signal timing and operation;designing League of California Cities traffic signing, striping and channelization; reviewing traffic studies; performing Public Woks Officers transportation planning, street lighting design, coordination of freeway Institute March 2010 construction and plan checking.Steve also coordinated and supervised the work (Monterey,CA) of engineer assistants,inspectors,maintenance supervisors,laborers and clerical American Planning support. He prepared the capital and operating budgets for the roads, Association April2008(Los construction, and traffic sections. He also prepared grant applications for state Angeles,CA) and federal funding on transportation-related improvements and programs. American Society of Civil Engineers April 2008 (Arlington,VA) STEVEN WRIGHT, PE,TE-CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER//CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER Associate Civil Engineer/City of Los Angeles/1988 - 1993 City and County Engineers Steve designed and prepared plans,specifications,and engineer's estimates for Association March 2008, the installation of traffic signal systems and channelization. (Los Angeles,CA) American Public Works Junior Civil Engineer/California State Department of Transportation Association November /1986 2007(Los Angeles,CA) Steve performed construction inspection of freeway interchanges,retaining walls and bridges to ensure conformance to plans and specifications. He provided consultation,research and design work for the project during construction. INTERWEST Robert Eisenbeisz, PE 0 CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER 1/7/W Robert is a California Registered Civil Engineer with 35 years of experience in civil and traffic engineering.Prior to joining Interwest,he served as the Public Works Director and City Engineer for the City of Rialto,where he managed and supervised capital construction projects including street pavement rehabilitations, street widening improvements, park improvements, and I NT E RW E S T building facility improvements.He managed a 5-year Cl P Program with an approximate budget Years of Experience:35 of$200M,delivering projects with an overall annual average value of$20 million. Robert also managed Maintenance and Operation services including street maintenance and repairs,park Education maintenance,building/facility maintenance and fleet services. He also previously worked for B.S.,Civil Engineering,California the City of San Bernardino for more than 10 years, holding multiple titles including City State Polytechnic University. Engineer,Interim Director of Public Works,Traffic Engineer and Senior Civil Engineer Pomona Reg: PROFESSIONAL HISTORY ® CA Registered Professional Civil Senior Plan Check Engineer/Interwest Consulting Group/2019-Present Engineer 1 54931 Robert provides civil and site development plan check reviews for Interwest's Southern Professional Affiliations California clients. American Public Works Association,Inland Empire Public Works Director I City Engineer/City of Rialto/2015-2019 Branch,Board Member and Past Robert was responsible for all activities and programs delivered by the Public Works President Department, including various divisions consisting of Engineering, Capital Project Delivery, American Society of Civil Public Works Construction,Maintenance and Operations,Utilities,and Fleet Services. Engineers Institute of Transportation City Engineer/City of San Bernardino/2007-2015 Engineers Robert managed and supervised the activities and programs of the City's Engineering Division, Riverside-San Bernardino,Traffic including the supervision of subordinate staff in the development of policies, goals, and Engineers Association objectives related to traffic engineering,real property,capital projects,public infrastructure, Areas of Expertise right-of-way permits, and inspection services. Additional tasks include advising the Public • Civil Engineering Works Director,City Manager, Mayor and City Council on complex engineering,construction, • Traffic Engineering transportation,traffic and land development issues. Robert developed and administered an • Project Management annual operating budget and an annual 5-year Capital Improvement Program, as well as - Program Management providing review and approval of land development projects and related public infrastructure improvements, supervision of permit and inspection services, and management of capital construction projects. In 2013, Robert served as Interim Director of Public Works for the City of San Bernardino, managing and supervising four divisions,including Engineering,Operations and Maintenance, Fleet Services,and Integrated Waste Management. Duties included the supervision of Public Works employees, management of operating budgets, and directly reporting to the City Manager, Mayor and Council on matters involving the City's public infrastructure, municipal services, maintenance activities, land development, buildings, real property and facilities management. Traffic Engineer/City of San Bernardino/2007 Robert supervised the City's Traffic Engineering Section and the City's Traffic Management Center. Duties included the review of development projects; traffic impact studies; traffic circulation, operations, and safety studies; as well as supervision and management of the design and construction of traffic signals, striping plans, and other traffic related capital projects. Senior Civil Engineer/City of San Bernardino/2004-2007 Robert supervised the City's land development and traffic engineering activities. Duties included the review of development projects; subdivisions; traffic circulation studies; operations analyses; and safety evaluations. Additional duties included supervision and management of the design and construction of traffic signals and other traffic related capital ROBERT EISENBEISZ, PE — CIVIL ENGINEER projects.Additional duties included management and supervision of personnel,work schedules,performance evaluations,employee interviews,and training.Technical duties included responsible charge of design and quality control in the preparation of traffic signal plans,construction documents,reports,calculations,and engineering analyses. Project/Office Manager/Tetra Tech, Inc./1999-2004 Robert's duties included office management, project management, and civil engineering for land development and public infrastructure projects.Office management duties included preparation of annual business and marketing plans;management of work schedules, and personnel supervision. Personnel supervision duties included interviewing and hiring employees, employee performance evaluations,and employee training.Project management duties included the preparation and management of project schedules and budgets.Technical duties include responsible charge of design and quality control in the preparation of improvement plans, construction documents, engineering reports, calculations, and analyses related to several large subdivision development projects. Project Manager/Krueper Engineering&Associates/1985-1999 Robert's duties included management of various development and transportation projects,supervision of subordinate employees. Project related duties included supervision and management of project schedules and budgets for development and transportation projects, including engineering design, plan checking, construction support, and engineering analyses. Transportation/Traffic Engineering duties included design of traffic signals,preparation of traffic studies,neighborhood traffic management plans,operational studies and safety evaluations. Development related duties included design of grading plans,retaining walls,drainage plans,storm drains,retention/detention basins,flood mitigation plans,subdivision engineering,utilities,water distribution plans,sanitary sewer plans,and street improvements,Additional duties included accident analyses,accident reconstruction,highway design evaluations, and technical reports. Samir Nuhaily, PE,TE . SENIOR CIVIL AND TRAFFIC ENGINEER nV Samir is a registered professional Civil and Traffic Engineer in the State of California. He is also a seasoned public works professional and an effective manager,dedicated to delivering successful projects. He has earned both a B.S. l N T E R W E S T and an M.S.degree in Civil Engineering and also holds teaching credentials as an engineering college professor. Years of Experience:35 Years w/Interwest:1 Samir has extensive experience in the delivery of complex building and infrastructure programs and has held middle,senior,and executive level positions Educatio- in public and private sector organizations.He has a proven record in leading and R MS and BS,Civil Engineering, managing large teams of managers, architects and engineers to deliver high San Diego State University, performances and exceed established targets. Additionally, he possesses an 1986 expert level of competence in the design and construction of infrastructure Registrations/Certifications systems and associated utilities,as well and in transportation planning and traffic CA,Professional Civil engineering. Engineer,C45044 CA,Professional Traffic PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Engineer,TR2258 CA,College Professor Senior Engine& !'onsulting Group /2019 Credentials in Engineering, Samir serves our public agency clients throughout Southern California as a senior 12485 engineer. Certified Competent GCC / 2006-2019 Toastmaster,2004 Over a span of more than a decade, Samir held multiple positions serving both Professional A,ffilitions private and public sector organizations. During that time he held the following • PMI Global Congress and positions across the globe. Symposium,2015-2018 Leading Complex Projects Program Manager/KAUST University,Saudi Arabia/2015-Present and Improving Business Construction Management Advisor/PWA,Qatar/2011-2015 Performance,September Director of Project Management Department/Secure Engineering,UAE/ 2008 2009-2011 Development Services Head of Design Management/EC Harris,UAE/2006- 2009 Management Academy, November 2005 City of Chula Vista, CA /198c - 2006 Franklin Covey Academy,the Samir served the City's Engineering Department for a period of more than 20 Four Roles of Leadership, years,holding the following positions: January 2001 Franklin Covey Academy,the City Traffic Engineer/Manager of the Transportation Division/2003-2006 Seven Habits of Highly Principal Manager / Manager of the Project Design and Management Effective People,April 1999 Department/2000-2003 Senior Manager / Manager of the Advanced Planning and Wastewater Divisions/1997-2000 Supervising Engineer / Immediate Supervisor of the Planning and Construction Divisions/1989-1997 Design and Resident Engineer/Design and Construction Divisions/1985- 1989 INTERWEST Ruth Smith, TE, PTP CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER tW Ruth is an experienced traffic engineer and transportation planner with 40 years of experience.She began her career in the private sector,preparing traffic impact studies,then moved to the public sector as a Senior Traffic Engineer for the City of l N T E R W E S T Santa Ana for 14 years. Ruth then returned to the private sector,where she not only prepared traffic impact studies,but also used her past experience to perform Years of Experience:40 Years w/Interwest:4 a variety of traffic engineering and transportation planning duties for client cities, including serving as contract City Traffic Engineer. Ruth's wide-ranging and Education unique experience in both the public and private sectors makes her a valuable B.S.,Civil Engineering, asset. Her municipal experience impressed upon her the importance of ensuring California State Polytechnic that traffic impact studies for private development are correct and complete,and University(Cal Poly) Pomona that site access and on-site circulation are fully addressed. Ruth also has a rich Registrations/certific:: background in neighborhood traffic plans, starting with managing the CA Registered Traffic Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan, Speed Hump and Permit Parking Engineer TR1650 programs in the City of Santa Ana, to more recently assisting the Cities of Professional Transportation Temecula, Brea, San Marino and Costa Mesa in preparing neighborhood traffic Planner(PTP)Certificate plans to reduce cut-through traffic and speeding. Professional Affiliations Institute of Transportation PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Engineers(ITE) President,SoCal Section Traffic Engineer/ Interwest Consulting Group/2016-Present (2007-2008) Ruth currently provides traffic engineering services to several cities.She provides American Society of Civil on-site assistance to the City of Costa Mesa three days per week, preparing Engineers(ASCE) reimbursement requests for OCTA projects,including interfacing with OCTA staff, Orange County Traffic managing and responding to citizen requests,assisting with the Bicycle Walking Engineering Council(OCTEC) Committee and finalizing the Bicycle Management Plan,handling neighborhood Areas of Expertise traffic management plan requests, investigating the use of golf carts/low speed • Traffic Engineering vehicles on public streets,and handling a variety of othertasks.Ruth also provides • Transportation Planning Traffic Engineer services to the City of San Marino,conducting investigations into citizen requests, preparing a variety of traffic studies and presenting them,with recommended actions,to the Traffic Advisory Commission,and providing support and advice as needed.She also provides traffic engineering services to the Cities of Wildomar, San Juan Capistrano, Bell, Atherton, Merced and Chowchilla on an as-needed basis,including preparing RFPs, reviewing traffic impact reports and trip generation, providing guidance on developer payment of traffic improvements,responding to citizen requests and school traffic concerns, preparing and reviewing work zone traffic control plans, implementing grant-funded programs, and reviewing permit parking programs. Project Manager I Traffic Engineer II/2008-2016 Ruth managed a variety of projects for a private consulting firm,including writing proposals,selecting appropriate staff to work on the projects,setting up and managing budgets,and invoicing clients.She performed traffic studies for client cities and private developers and served as the contract City Traffic Engineer for the City of Placentia for five years,working on-site two half-days per week. She was also contract City Traffic Engineer for the Cities of Los Alamitos and Temecula and the Consultant Traffic Engineer for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Her traffic study experience included preparing and reviewing traffic impact studies, preparing neighborhood traffic management and parking plans, preparing traffic impact analyses for proposed developments and for Project Study Reports/Project Reports for proposed highway improvement projects, preparing parking analyses for existing and proposed developments, conducting Engineering and Traffic Surveys to set speed limits and conducting traffic RUTH SMITH,TE, PTP—TRAFFIC ENGINEER signal warrant and stop signs studies. She also presented study results and recommendations to Traffic Safety Commissions,Planning Commissions and City Councils. Senior Associate/ Urban Crossroads,Inc./2002-2008 Ruth managed a transportation planning group of five employees. In addition to supervising the preparation of traffic impact, parking,trip generation and on-site circulation studies and reports,she also interfaced with clients and municipal staff,coordinated work with civil engineering and environmental consultants,and appeared before planning commissions,city councils and boards of supervisors.She prepared studies for a variety of developments, both large and small,including planned communities,commercial developments,warehouses,distribution centers, churches, an asphalt plant, wineries, and PR/PSRs for new and existing freeway interchanges. Ruth collaborated with developers, their architects and civil engineers to redesign on-site circulation plans and project access to improve traffic flow and meet jurisdiction requirements.She worked on in-fill projects and the remodeling of existing sites,and supervised the preparation of signing and striping plans related to development projects. Senior Traffic Engineer/City of Santa Ana/ 1988-2002 Ruth supervised groups ranging from two to five employees&administered the City's neighborhood traffic calming program (including traffic diverters and speed humps);handled citizen requests for stop signs,parking restrictions, crosswalks,etc.;managed the Santa Ana Pedestrian Safety Task Force;reviewed traffic study reports;and managed citywide traffic counts. Ruth administered the Integrated Traveler Information Sharing system, part of the Traffic Management Center, which provided automated real-time traffic information to the public through highway advisory radio,highway advisory telephone,cable TV,and kiosks($348,000 grant). Ruth applied for and administered two Office of Traffic Safety grants ($219,000) to improve pedestrian safety citywide.She also successfully submitted grant applications for Safe Routes to School(SR2S) projects,for a total of $2,000,000 in grants for pedestrian safety improvements. She designed and implemented an overhead signage program to guide motorists to Civic Center and Downtown areas and made presentations to the City Council,City Commissions, the Environmental and Transportation Advisory Committee, schools, business groups, and neighborhood associations. Due to staff rotation,at various times Ruth was also responsible for street striping plans and construction zone traffic control plans. Because of this, she was responsible for coordinating with Caltrans on several freeway projects, including the SR 55 widening project. Ruth was on the APWA committee that produced the 2001 Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH), she developed the Neighborhood Traffic Plan and Speed Hump programs, and Neighborhood Parking Management plans,and she administered a citywide speed limit update,the Traffic Control Devices Inventory,and the Accident Data Base. INTERWEST Roberto Cedillo 410 ENGINEERING INTERN Roberto is acquiring essential on-the-job knowledge early on in his engineering career. While working with Interwest, Roberto has worked on the San Jacinto Citywide Signal Timing Upgrades and the City of Port Hueneme Citywide Speed I N T E R W E S T Survey Update projects.Roberto communicates effectively in English and Spanish and has strong attention to detail. Years w/Interwest:1 PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Education AA,Engineering, Engineering Intern/Interwest Consulting Group/2020-Present Specialization in Electrical Roberto assists in the overall project development under the supervision of a head Engineering,Ventura Engineer.He generates reports,analyzes budget goals and cost estimates. College,CA Technician Intern/Power Bright Electric/2018-2020 Roberto read blueprints and schematics to layout power supply and circuitry, operated machinery and worked in small teams to accomplish commercial and residential projects. Retail Associate,Stock Employee/ Levi's Strauss&Co./2017-2019 Roberto organized and sorted incoming and outgoing shipments,set finishes and adjusted the store set accordingly with full inventory. Oranos Mekwian 1110 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN Oranos is knowledgeable about chemical and biological processes for industrial and other purposes. She recently assisted in the Project Management for Waste Discharge Requirements(WDR)and the Federal Clean Water Act in Maywood. I N T E R W E$T PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Years of Experience:3 Engineering Technician/Interwest Consulting Group/2017- Present Years w/Interwest:3 Oranos has specific experience in the following areas: Education Wastewater/Storm Water Management MS,Industrial Chemistry, Maywood Notice of Violation Response and Mitigation with the Los Angeles King Mongkut's University of Regional Water Quality Control Board(WDR Compliance) Technology,Thonburi, Maywood Sewer System Evaluation Study (SSES) including developing Thailand Request for Proposals for Sewer Flushing and Documentation, Manhole BS,Biotechnology,Kohn Mapping Index,identified problem sewers in Maywood and scheduled for CIP. Kean University,Thailand Sewer Master Plan(SMP)Update-Currently updating the Maywood SMP. Areas of x! ertiF Sewer Service Charge(SSC)-Project Manager for Rate Study and Engineer's ri Industrial Chemistry Report for the development of the Maywood SSC. Biological Processes Developed Storm Water/Sewer Request for proposals for Maywood. Report Writing Maywood Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP). Produced, formatted and finalized report for City Council Meeting August 9,2017. Produced staff reports. Street Design SB1 Street Program provided Staff report for City Council approval with attachment. Measure R-requested funding agreement via City Council for funding of 1-710 EIR/EIS review. Provided comments for the 1-710 EIR/EIS review. Los Angeles County Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc.traffic control system (KITS)-provided Staff report for Agreement between LA County and City of Maywood. Private Development Developed Easement documents for 10 Chaparral for Rancho Palos Verdes Planning. Assessment District Engineering Assisted Assessment District Engineer for Maywood Street Lighting District Kevin Ko, PE, QSD 0 CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER IrW Kevin is a registered Civil Engineer and certified Qualified SWPPP Developer with multiple years of experience providing civil engineering services to various municipal clients in Southern California. His experience includes civil design for I N T E R W E S T drainage,grading,storm water quality,and utility projects as well as construction 7 management on a number of capital projects such as street improvements,sewer Years of Experience: improvements,and park improvements. Kevin has also provided plan review on Years w/Interwest:6 development projects and undertaken preliminary engineering studies to Education address infrastructure issues all while providing excellent customer service and BS,Civil Engineering, completing tasks in an accurate,timely,and friendly manner.Overall,Kevin is an University of Hawaii,Manoa adaptable individual who embraces new challenges exceptionally. Honolulu PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Graduate Coursework,Civil and Structural Engineering, Interwest Consulting Group Experience University of Hawaii,Manoa Honolulu Construction Manager I Plans Examiner/ 2019- Present Graduate Coursework, As a Construction Manager and Plans Examiner for the City of South Pasadena, Structural Engineering, Kevin provides oversight for the City's capital improvement projects. He is University of Illinois,Urbana- directly involved with the plan review and comment process, coordination Champaign with the contractor and designer, and works alongside the construction Registr'titl,nsr!`Eartificatior- inspector to ensure the projects are completed within budget and according a CA Registered Civil Engineer to the specifications. His recent projects include the Bushnell Ave, Diamond C88495 Ave,and Lyndon St Street Improvement Project and the Alpha Ave and Camino HI Professional Civil Engineer Del Sol Street and Water Improvement Project. As a Plans Examiner, Kevin PE-18883 assists the Public Works Department with residential development and Qualified SWPPP Developer redevelopment plan review as well as providing over the counter plan reviews (QSD)I C88495 during the City's designated plan review counter hours. Areas of Expertise Senior ,n., �_ • Civil Engineering IAs an Associate/Senior Engineer for the City of Maywood,Kevin serves as Project Drainage Grading Manager and Construction Manager on a number of CIP projects.Kevin is directly Site Planning involved in the design and construction of street resurfacing, sidewalk Storm Water Quality improvements, slurry seal, sewer replacement, and park projects. His recent Utility projects include a traffic calming roundabout and development of Maywood Riverfront Park in collaboration with USEPA and US Army Corps of Engineers. Kevin also works closely with the team's Construction Inspectors to ensure projects are completed within a timely manner and within budget. As of September 2019, Kevin was appointed as the City's contract City Engineer to oversee capital projects and the City's engineering functions. Plans Examiner /2016 - 201' As a Plans Examiner for the City of Pomona, Kevin provided residential building plan check and inspection services, ensuring building permit applicants and permittees met the California Residential Code, City's municipal code, and Title 24 requirements. KEVIN Ko, PE, QSD — CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER As the Transit Coordinator for the City of Covina, Kevin was responsible for overseeing the Department of Public Works Transportation Division's operations which included managing service contracts for the maintenance of the City's streets,parking lots,parking structures,Metrolink station,and Dial-A-Ride program(Covina Transit).His duties included developing and implementing procedures for Covina Transit, implementing a vehicle replacement program for its fleet,and procuring a contract service provider to operate the service.He served as the City's liaison between the City and Metrolink, coordinated maintenance of the train station, managed service contracts for security services at the City's Metrolink station and parking structures,facilitated the Covina Police Department and Department of Public Work's in procuring a surveillance system for the premises,and implemented a secure bicycle parking station.He also prepared and managed the Transportation Division's annual budget,coordinating with the Engineering Department to determine Prop A,Prop C,Measure R,TDA3,STPL,Gas Tax,and Grant funding as part of the City's CIP program. Assistant I Associate Engineer/2014 - 2017 As an Assistant/Associate Engineer for the City of Bell, Kevin has designed a number of pavement rehabilitation, slurry seal,and sewer replacement and lining projects,handled citizen requests for service, provided construction administration and inspection on construction projects and worked on with the team's Associate Engineer on Project Funding including Prop C,Measure R,Gas Tax,STPL and Grant projects.Kevin has also provided plan review on development projects and undertaken preliminary engineering studies to address infrastructure issues.Kevin is an adaptable individual who addresses new challenges exceptionally well. OTHER EXPERIENCE As a Civil Designer,Kevin collaborated with a team of professional engineers to develop civil construction plans for various small to large scale commercial land development projects in various counties in the State of Hawaii. He performed calculations and prepared reports for grading,erosion control,drainage,storm water quality,and water and wastewater systems as required for permit acquisition.He also coordinated with municipal agencies to address submittal review comments and compliance issues during approval process. Associates Include: Kalialinui Bridge Repair,Maui,Hawaii Kapahulu Ave/Kihei Place Parking Lot,Honolulu,Hawaii Lanihau Shopping Center,Maui,Hawaii Nimitz McDonald's,Honolulu,Hawaii Park Lane Ala Moana,Honolulu,Hawaii Puhi Warehouse,Kauai,Hawaii Puunene Shopping Center,Maui,Hawaii Quality General Baseyard,Honolulu,Hawaii Services Rentals Kona,Kona,Hawaii Wasa Electrical New Building,Honolulu,Hawaii Nicole Jules, PE ! DIRECTOR i% TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES // CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER 1r/W Nicole has over 20 years of progressive professional experience and a results- oriented track record.She has managed a variety of complex,controversial public I N T E R W E S T works improvement projects in both private and public employment and enjoys being a civil servant. Her 13-year career spans all aspects of civil engineering, Years of Experience:13+ including working in a variety of environments. Her well-rounded experience has Education developed an ability to work successfully with varied clients and communities. ® BS,Civil Engineering, Nicole has expertise in understanding how to balance good engineering with university of California, practical and feasible solutions. She has provided services that include traffic Irvine signal design and construction, geometric design, traffic impact studies, traffic MS of Planning, circulation and parking analyses, construction staging, and traffic control plan Transportation Planning, design. Additionally, she is proficient in roadway design, curb, gutter, sidewalk university of California,Los Angeles and median design, precise grading and storm drain facilities. Her experience includes project management for the construction of storm drain facilities, Registrations/Certifications I roadway rehabilitation projects, a landslide stabilization project, and park CA Registered Civil Engineer improvements. 65984 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Member,American Public Traffic Signal,Signing and Stripping/Stage Construction Design Works Association(APWA) Perris Blvd/Nuevo Rd Striping Concepts Wal-Mart,City of Perris Member,American Society Traffic Signal Construction Wal-Mart,City of Fountain Valley of Civil Engineers(ASCE) Traffic Signal/Signing&Striping Lowe's,City of Santee Member,Institute of Traffic Signal/Signing&Striping Sam's Club,City of El Monte Transportation Engineers Traffic Signal Lowes,City of San Jacinto Traffic Signal/Signing&Striping Nordahl Road/Medical Ctr Way, City of San Marcos Signing&Striping Lowe's,Town of Apple Valley College Blvd/Salk Avenue Traffic Signal,City of Carlsbad El Toro Road Signing,Striping&Stage Construction,City of Mission Viejo Alameda Corridor, Mid-Corridor Signing & Striping, Cities of Compton, Lynwood,Los Angeles Redondo Beach Blvd&Rehabilitation,City of Gardena Harry Bridges Road Construction Staging,City of Los Angeles Traffic Signal/Signing&Striping Kmart,City of Hesperia Traffic Signal Wal-Mart,City of Anaheim Carson Street WTCP,City of Carson Saint Claire Catholic Church Signing&Striping,City of Santa Clarita Civil Design Bake Parkway Median Modification,City of Irvine Precise Grading&Street Improvements,Disney Parking Lot#6 Dominguez Channel Bicycle and Multipurpose lane,City of Compton Caltrans Storm Water BMP Pilot,District 12 Spring Street medians,City of Signal Hill Walnut/Bixby Road Pressure Reducing Station & Bypass Line, City of Signal Hill NICOLE JULES, PE — DIRECTOR II TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES II CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER • Long Beach Naval Yard Demolition Project,City of Long Beach Traffic Impact and Parking Studies ▪ Pacific Place Mixed-use Development,City of El Monte • Atlanta Plaza Health Spa,City of Monterey Park • Gateway Crossing Movie Theatre&Shopping Center,City of La Canada-Flintridge • Alameda Corridor EIR/EIS,City of Los Angeles • Huntington Beach Medical Center Parking Survey,City of Huntington Beach • Resurrection Cemetery Mausoleum Addition,City of Montebello • Prescott College Precise Plan,City of Prescott,AZ • Foothill Blvd./Gould Ave.Retail Center • Avenue I/SR-2 PS&E,City of Santa Clarita • Douglas Street Grade Separation El R,City of El Segundo • Homeland Cultural Center Expansion Parking study,City of Long Beach • St.John of the Cross,City of Lemon Grove • Ventana Real Lots(1-4),City of Carlsbad • Date Street Development,City of Murrieta • Carmelo Street Motel,City of Oceanside • World Petrol III,City of San Diego PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Director of Traffic Services/ Interwest Consulting Group/2017—Present Nicole manages I nterwest's group of traffic engineers throughout California and provides on-call traffic engineering, project management,small cell site and traffic analysis and plan review for clients including the City of Costa Mesa, Hermosa Beach,Maywood,Rancho Palos Verdes,Eastvale,Wildomar,South Pasadena and Palm Desert. Deputy Director of Public Works/City of Rancho Palos Verdes,CA/2014-2017 Nicole performed advanced engineering work in planning,organizing,and directing the day-to-day activities of the Public Works Department. She managed and oversaw the administrative division as well as supervise the design, construction, maintenance and operation of streets, public structures, parks,water and sewer systems, and other City public works projects.Nicole provided engineering assistance and coordination to other City departments and managed professional consultants and contractors on public works improvement projects.Assisted in preparing the Department budget and Capital Improvement Plan.Reviewed the preparation of plans for overall projects,including design study reports, environmental impact statements, and traffic engineering reports as well as review departmental staff reports for City Council and advisory board meetings. Nicole served as staff liaison to the Infrastructure Advisory Committee, Traffic Safety Committee and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. Provided leadership and support to a team of 16 dynamic individuals to follow-through with the goals of the organization. Senior Engineer/City of Rancho Palos Vcrd:es, CA/2009 - 2014 Nicole managed several large capital improvement projects, resulting in major improvements to the City's infrastructure and roadway network. Implemented a 7-year roadway rehabilitation program to preserve the City's roadway infrastructure. She managed projects and maintenance activities within the City's rights-of-way. Administered the City's encroachment permit and parking permit programs.Supervised and managed a team of 5 consisting of Associate Engineers,Assistant Engineers,Permit Technicians and Public Works Inspectors.Nicole also improved the Department's delivery of customer service by streamlining permit requirements and coordinating permit activities with other departments. INTERWEST NICOLE JULES, PE - DIRECTOR//TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES//CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER Project Manager and Staff Liaison I Provided various municipal traffic engineering improvements,including traffic signal maintenance, signing and striping plans, investigating citizen requests for traffic controls and traffic safety analysis. 25th Street Roadway and Drainage Rehabilitation/Rancho Palos Verdes Project Manager I Provided Project Management services for construction of storm drain improvements and roadway resurfacing along 25th Street in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.This$500,000 project included 36" HDPE pipe,an outlet structure,several drain inlets,asphalt rubber and metal beam guard rail modifications. San Ramon Drainage and Landslide Stabilization/Rancho Palos Verdes Project Manager I Provided Project Management services of a$4 million landslide stabilization project on private property in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The project included construction of 36" HDPE storm drain pipe, an outlet structure, over 75,000 tons of highly engineered imported fill, 4" subdrains, v-ditches, landscaping and irrigation. Principal /Torrance:CA/ 2004- 2009 As a consulting engineer,Nicole provided professional engineering services to municipal and private clients.Services included signal design,geometric design, project management,traffic and parking studies. Managed a team of 12 professionals. Senior Engineer/Rancho Palos Verdes,CA/2002-2004 Nicole managed several large high-profile capital improvement projects,including museum improvements,storm drain enhancements,landslide stabilization,lead remediation, pavement rehabilitation,traffic improvements and transportation management strategies.Directed and managed a host of consultants and contractors.Coordinated with other City Departments on complex development projects and also participated in leadership development activities. Associate Engineer/Torrance, CA/2001-2001 Nicole was the Project Manager for several capital improvement projects including water main improvements,storm drain connections and pavement rehabilitation.Managed the city's pavement management system. Newton/Madison Street and Water Improvement/Torrance, CA Construction Manager I Construction Manager of water main construction and roadway rehabilitation on Madison Street and Newton Street. This $2 million project included water main, storm drain, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and roadway improvements. Assistant Engineer/Signal Hill,CA/2000-2001 Nicole facilitated the City's capital improvement program.Prepared project plans,specifications and cost estimates. She managed several consultants and contractors and coordinated construction activities with other City departments. Responsible for the City's pavement management system and inspected small-scale projects within the city's rights-of-way.Successfully designed two water-system modification projects and managed a CDBG funded residential demolition project. Andral Pa,-emr^nt.Mnonaement/Slurry Seal Proaram/Signal Hill, C,^- Project Manager I Project manager of City of Signal Hill's annual pavement maintenance program.This$500,000 program included slurry-sealing about 1/2 of City of Signal Hill's residential streets. Project Engineer/Lynwood,CA f 1998- 2000 Nicole was the project engineer for the surface design group of the Alameda Corridor-Mid Corridor project.Designed roadway, signing/striping, traffic signal, and landscape improvements in the Cities of Compton, Lynwood and Los Angeles.Coordinated sub-consultant design criteria and plan submittals with the lead design team. NICOLE JULES, PE — DIRECTOR//TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES//CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER Design Engineer/Irvine,CA/1998- 2000 Nicole prepared precise grading,storm drain,street improvement,signing,striping,signal and traffic control plans for various clients.Managed small design projects for several cities in Orange County. Research Assistant/Los Angeles,CA/1995-1996 Nicole assisted with the management and coordination of an integrated advanced transportation management system which evolved from existing freeway and arterial traffic management systems in the Irvine area of Orange County. Transportation Engineering Assistant/Monterey Park,CA/ 1994-1998 Nicole conducted traffic impact studies for various clients throughout southern California. Managed transportation/circulation studies for the City and County of Los Angeles. Designed and prepared traffic signal, signing,striping and traffic control plans for several municipalities in Southern California. Nicole assisted with the analysis of real-time traffic data and information concerning operation of the freeway system in Orange County,as a student assistant in the Transportation Management Center(TMC). Joseph Mullaney, EIT 41. ASSOCIATE ENGINEER rtiV Joseph possesses years of experience providing civil engineering services in the public arena working with various municipalities. He has extensive experience in design, investigation and coordination of fiber optic systems. He also is familiar I N T E R W E.rs T with FTTP design regulations. Joseph's experience also includes providing support in the areas of traffic engineering,construction project management,and Years of Experience:S land development. Years wI Interwest:2 He is known for his ability to efficiently multi-task on projects providing our clients Educa4t; with a broad range of services.He is consistently professional and exercises good BS,Civil Engineering, judgment in his handling of all matters. University of Massachusetts PROFESSIONAL HISTORY CA,Engineering-in-Training (EIT),22461 Joseph provides engineering support for various clients in Southern California.He also works with contracts and proposals to ensure client satisfaction. His most recent assignments include. Assistant Traffic Engineer/Oxnard, CA-Joseph prepared work orders for installing and removing traffic control devices, responded to client inquiries related to traffic operations and conducted temporary traffic control plan check and comments per CA MUTCD. He monitored traffic counts, speed surveys,plan revisions,stop sign warrant analysis and field work. Field Engineer/ Maywood, CA - Joseph used ArcGIS to do city wide sign surveys(field data collection). Field Engineer/South Pasadena,CA-Joseph conducted stop sign warrant analysis(field data collection and analysis). Field Engineer/Palm Desert,CA-Joseph monitored intersection and stop sign warrant analysis. Plan Check Engineer / Maywood, CA and Seal Beach, CA - Joseph did temporary traffic control plan check and comment per CA MUTCD. Prior to joining Interwest, Joseph held positions with private design and construction firms where he gained experience overseeing multiple land development construction projects. Joseph is proficient in the use of various computer programs including, AutoCad, Microsoft Excel, Adobe, MathCad, MATLAB,and GTSTRUDL. Daniel Garcia, PE, REA, CPP dP CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER // PROJECT MANAGER 1rW Dan is a licensed civil engineer with extensive city engineering and project management experience. He has served in senior and executive management public works positions with the cities of Maywood, Costa Mesa, Norwalk, El l N T E R W E S T Segundo, Solvang, Culver City and Novato. Daniel brings to each project experience and expertise in the areas of Capitol Improvement Program Years of Experience:20+ management, Private Development, Grading, Parks and Land Use, Water Years w/Interwest:6 Resources and Transportation Planning. 74x4+=._ PROJECT EXPERIENCE BS,Civil Engineering, California State University, Long beach Program Manager I As the Program Manager for park projects,Dan managed the MS,Public Administration, California Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program Grant($200,000) California State University, with the County of Marin.This project drained,re-graded and installed new park Long Beach equipment to this hydraulically significant pond. Registrations/Certifications Prefabricated Park Building Installations (various park locations) / • CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer I 45710 Provided design and installation of prefabricated park structures such as Registered Environmental Restroom and Storage facilities to match various park needs. Assessor 5640,Cal-EPA Certified Permitting Firestone Bridge Over the San Gabriel River Project/City of Norwalk, Professional D11308 SCAQMD Project Manager I Serving as Project Manager,he completed the design and right- of-way phases as City Engineer/Project Manager. Project Management Interstate 5 Widening Mitigation Projects (completed design and City Engineering construction) /Los Angeles, CA CIP Management Norwalk Boulevard/San Antonio Blvd.from Rosecrans Ave.to Florence Avenue. Rosecrans Avenue/Bloomfield Ave.from Carmenita Ave.to Imperial Highway. Pioneer Boulevard from Imperial Highway to Florence Avenue. Union Street/Paddison Street from Firestone Boulevard to San Antonio Blvd. Construction Manager I As Construction Manager representing Culver City, Dan implemented Change Orders and Requests for Information regarding unforeseen utility conflicts. Sepulveda Boulevard Beautification Project / Between Culver Boulevard and the Southerly Culver City city-line Construction Manager I As Construction Manager, Dan provided construction oversight and implemented significant changes in the field for this project. DANIEL GARCIA, PE, REA,CPP-CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER//PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Contract City Engineer/City of Maywood As City Engineer he was responsible for developing a Capital Improvement Program that includes a$1 million USEPA Sewer Replacement Project,Coordinating with the Gateway Cities on the 1-710 mitigation,developing projects for submittal for funding of Early Action 1-710 fund. He coordinates efforts with such agencies as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority(MTA),Caltrans,and Gateway Cities and the County of Los Angeles. Proiect Enoineer/City of Cost Mes-. Served as Contract Project Engineer and Program Manager for Fairview Park reviews and recommends grading plans for the Building Division that include the Chargers Training Facility and Lions Park Community Facility and Library. He coordinates efforts with such agencies as the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA),Caltrans,and the County of Orange. City Engineer/City of Norwalk Notable projects while serving as City Engineer include completing the design and right of way phase of the $22 million Firestone Bridge project and implementing$6 million in 1-5 mitigation projects.He coordinated efforts with such agencies as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority(MTA),Caltrans,and Gateway Cities,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Southern California Edison and the County of Los Angeles. Public Works Director j City Engineer/ City of Solvang Responsibilities included the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program and maintenance of streets, storm drains, private development, transit, sewer collection, sewer treatment, water distribution, wastewater treatment,building maintenance and solid waste.Coordinated city issues with regional agencies such as the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG), the Public Works Coordination Council, the Sanitation Agencies Management Association(SAMA)and the Central Coast Water Agency(CCWA). Obtained approval from the State of California for a$10.2 million Revolving Fund Grant for water treatment on Well Number 3 in the Santa Ynez River. Reviewed private development including grading,paving,storm drain and sewer. Implemented the development of a new Skate Park Street Improvements,Water and Sewer Replacements(various locations) Obtained two new buses for Solvang Transit Wrote LOMR's(Letters of Map Revisions)for FEMA affected parcels Assistant City Engineer/ City of El Segundo Completed the construction of the Douglas Street Gap Closure Project ($39 million) Implemented $1 million seismic retrofit of the City's 3.1 MG Water Reservoir. Completed construction and audits for the Douglas Street Gap Closure 3.1 Million Gallon Water Reservoir Seismic Retrofit Street Improvements,Waterline and Sewer Replacements(various locations) 118th Street Improvements-Included reconstruction of street and coordination with BNSF Railway and Metro for the replacement of deteriorated rail with concrete paneled rails. Dan was responsible for the management of both private and Capital Improvement Projects. He successfully obtained approvals through presentations to City Council,Planning Commission and Design Review Committee and also coordinated with the Planning,Building,and Parks and Recreation Departments within the City.Externally,he coordinated with Marin County,the Army Corps,the Coastal Conservancy,special Districts and the public. He was also responsible for FEMA Flood Districts and encroachment permits. Private Development Review-As the Principal Civil Engineer in charge of Private Development,Dan coordinated with Developers and their Engineers through the City's Design Review, Planning and City Council processes in DANIEL GARCIA, PE, REA, CPP-CA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER//PROJECT MANAGER accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, implementing Conditions of Approval and other State and Federal requirements.This included advocating for the City's interests in the design of these developments. Senior Civil Engineer :,:ity of Culver City As manager of the Capital Improvement Program and Sewer Collection System,his role included the coordination of industrial waste,air quality management,assessment districts and recycled water. Coordinated the Amalgamated Sewer Agreement with the City of Los Angeles. This included making capital improvements to the telemetry system for meters detecting the flow in and out of Culver City. Managed the Sewer Assessment District -This included coordination with the Los Angeles County Assessor regarding changes in customer water billings and capital improvements. Analysis of the Braddock Sewer Pump Station Improvement which led to the overhaul of the Culver City Sewer Master Plan. Instrumental in Sewer Replacements&Street Improvements(various locations) INTERWEST Grace Alvarez, PE PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING MANAGER Grace is a seasoned Planning and Programming Manager with more than 32 years of municipal experience and a passion for public service. Over her career, she has served the County of Riverside and the City of San Jacinto I N T E R W E 5 T and acted as a consultant, providing her with the unique opportunity to see municipal processes from multiple perspectives, as a City, County and Years of Experience:13+ private employee. Years w/Interwest:3 Grace has cultivated years of expertise in transportation planning and Education programming and is knowledgeable of all applicable state and federal BA, Administration, Public requirements and processes, as well as local concerns and considerations Administration for transportation projects. She has a solid track record of successfully Concentration, California delivering projects, procuring grant funding, and addressing problems, and is State University, San bilingual in English and Spanish. Bernardino, 2006 PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Planning and Programming Manager/ Interwest Consulting Group/2017 —2020 Grace supervises other planning personnel, such as consultants and developers. She prepares budgets and oversees expenditures. Grace manages the development and execution of small to large transportation and grant acquisition projects ensuring that every aspect is completed on time and within budget. Planning and Programming Manager/ Riverside County Transportation Commission / 2007-2017 In this position, Grace managed the planning and programming of transportation projects and programs for the County of Riverside, Riverside County member cities, and various transit and rail agencies. Her responsibilities also included the day-to-day development and management of funding and planning programs administered by the Commission, such as Measure A, State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG), Active Transportation Program (ATP), and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) formula funding programs. Grace also handled the obligation and allocation of funding for Commission projects, as well as assisting the Commission member agencies with the obligation and allocation of funding approved by the Commission. Executive Assistant to the City Manager and City Engineer / City of San Jacinto, CA / 1985-2007 During her tenure with the City of San Jacinto, Grace held various positions, including Community Development Administrative Clerk; Administrative Assistant to the City Manager and Deputy City Clerk; and Administrative Assistant to the City Manager and City Engineer. Her exposure to several municipal departments during her time at the City of San Jacinto afforded Grace a well-rounded education in local government and a strong foundation upon which she based the rest of her career. Brett A. Paulson, SR/WA, R/W-RAC, R/W-NAC 1110 With more than 25 years of experience in privately and publicly financed projects,Brett Paulson 117W is an expert in planning,managing and coordinating all aspects of right of way projects,including: site selection, licensing, acquisition, relocation, condemnation support, property management and demolition. He is highly efficient in developing metrics for measuring performance and I N T E R W E S T ensuring agents execute work plans, initiatives, strategies, processes and procedures. Having Years of Experience:25 taken 23 International Right of Way Association disciplinary courses, Brett is very experienced with the application of federal regulations and guidelines associated with acquisition,relocation Education assistance and management of real property for public entities. He routinely undertakes public • Business Law,Truckee Meadow works projects requiring total compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real College Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970,as amended, California local and state requirements, Principles and Law,Grempler Real Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration. Estate School PROJECT EXPERIENCE Registrations/Certifications CaIDRE Salesperson,License No. Sit-13? 1t s; _ a, ct City of "tucl=.sto 01405337 Interwest was selected to provide comprehensive right of way services for approximately 59 Notary Public,California parcels for this project involving the construction of a new four-lane expressway in Modesto, Professional Affiliations California. As the relocation manager, Brett is responsible for overseeing approximately ten • Member,IRWA business displacements.His tasks include managing:displacee interviews;issuance of entitlement • IRWA Disciplinary Courses(23) packages; advisory services; timely relocation claim processing; move coordination; and file quality control/assurance. Areas of Expertise ■ Relocation Appeals Hearing Highway 101/HOV Rehabilitation Project I City of Santa Barbara (Subconsultant to Officer MNS Engineers) • Utility Coordination and Relocation Expert As a project manager, Brett worked with MNS Engineers, Caltrans and other consultants to Regulatory Compliance Expert provide a refined cost study and right of way data sheets,which included utility,railroad and other project-specific items. He computed cost by applying values to estimate parameters and other line items, coordinated project construction assumptions with Caltrans and MNS Engineers, created proper escalation rates for each segment of the project and tailored the cost estimates to adopt key project data. As project manager,Brett was responsible for planning and coordinating construction for new residential sites due to impacts imposed by gas transmission pipelines. He oversaw construction services, including contractors, landscapers, permitting and the development of a replacement mobile home site.Brett also provided relocation assistance services,processed documents and approved relocation claims. Part 150 Noise Abatement Plan I Washoe County International Airport As project manager,Brett provided project management services to the Washoe County(Reno/Tahoe)International Airport for their Part 150 Noise Abatement Plan.The project involved acquisition and relocation of commercial,residential and mixed-use properties,some of which were designated historical properties,and many mobile homes. Canyon Country Community Center Project I City of Santa Clarita The City of Santa Clarita is constructing a large Canyon Country Community Center on a 6.5-acre site located near the intersection of Soledad Canyon Road and Sierra Highway.The new center will include a gymnasium,community and fitness rooms,an open-turf play area, outdoor event spaces,teaching kitchen,walkways and landscaping.To prepare for construction,the City required acquisition and business relocation services.Brett is coordinating,facilitating client/public meetings,managing the appraisal and acquisition process and provided oversight for all commercial relocation activities,including preparing Notice of Entitlements,approving claims,issuing 90-day notices and providing referrals. He also ensures that the monthly tracking reports contained clear and concise information regarding the status of claims for each tenant. This$47 million project,which involved Caltrans oversight,widened the Citrus Avenue Overcrossing from five to eight lanes over Interstate 10(1-10)and reconfigured the I-10/Citrus Avenue interchange in the City of Fontana.As project manager,Brett's responsibilities included: reviewing appraisals and providing support for proposed administrative settlements,offering solutions where needed.He relocated many complicated businesses,including several trucking operations,an industrial construction plumbing company and a gas station. i )- W r T BRETT A. PAULSON, SR/WA, R/W-RAC, R/W-NAC — RIGHT-OF-WAY MANAGER Philadelphia/Cypress Traffic Signalization and Street Widening Project I City of Ontario Brett served as a quality manager for this project,which is funded using federal Highway Safety Improvement Program funds and involves Caltrans oversight and Right of Way Certification.He oversaw the delivery of appraisals,title and right of way engineering services,working closely with our subconsultants to ensure that client expectations were exceeded.Brett maintained the Company's Quality Management Program and ensured that all deliverables met the set quality standards. South Side of La Palma Avenue Project I City of Anaheim The City of Anaheim required comprehensive right of way services for four parcels,consisting of family residences, located on La Palma Avenue for the South Side of La Palma Avenue Project.As quality manager,Brett coordinated with the appraiser and review appraiser to complete appraisal assignments and inspections.His responsibilities also included:reviewing title reports to verify potential impacts to the right of way area; standard quality control for appraisals, review appraisals and offer packages; database set-up and electronic file management;oversight of the right of way certification process;and coordination with the City's public works department to collect data for utility relocation. Del Obispo Road Widening Project I City of San Juan Capistrano Brett managed the right of way acquisition services for the Del Obispo Street Widening Project,which will widen Del Obispo Street on its west side between Calle Aspero and Paseo De La Paz.An additional lane,bike lane and sidewalk will be added and the project will affect approximately 750 feet of Del Obispo Street. He oversaw the team,as well as our subconsultants,to provide appraisal and acquisition services for additional right of way and temporary construction easements for six parcels. INTERWEST APPENDIX Team Subconsultants: Arellano Associates 101) arellano associates --- -- 5BS1 fire Avenue,Suite A�Chino Hi ls,CA 91/09 9 arellano associates arelia,roas,ociates room Firm Profile Established in 1994, Arellano Associates (AA) is a consulting firm specializing in communications and public outreach, community and government relations, and strategic planning and marketing programs. AA has been working for more than two decades to deliver marketing and community outreach programs for some of Southern California's most important transportation, public safety, sustainability, planning, and infrastructure improvement projects. Our team of professionals provides comprehensive communications and planning services for the full spectrum of public projects from planning to construction or implementation. AA also offers specialized professional services geared toward Latino and Spanish-speaking communities. AA is a Limited Liability Corporation and is woman and minority owned. AA is a certified Small Business-owned (SBE) and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE). AA operates out of a single office in the City of Chino Hills and is comprised of a team of 44 staff members. Our vision is to positively impact our communities through honest and creative engagement using innovative communication tools and techniques. arellnno 4 � � 1 5.144. if "! re 'V ., 'il . AA has extensive experience providing innovative and engaging outreach programs that exceed environmental compliance standards while building community support for projects and programs. Our firm's understanding and appreciation for stakeholder diversity — along with bringing forward the latest innovations in outreach — enables us to work together with clients toward achieving their goals. Over the years, we have established the knowledge, the relationships and the credibility with communities so that we serve as a trusted partner to agencies throughout California. f arellano I1 associates Chester K. Britt Professional Summary Executive Vice Chester K. Britt serves as the Executive Vice President for Arellano President Associates. With 30 years of experience, Chester has managed diverse communications and planning programs for numerous large- scale and high-profile transportation projects across all phases of project development, including long-range planning, feasibility studies, alternatives analysis, environmental studies, final design and 4t, engineering and construction. His experience covers Southern California as well as statewide programs. Chester's project experience ,41/4,300 has focused on working with clients on strategic decision-making, creative outreach applications and issue resolution. Specifically, through the course of his project experience, he has come to understand the issues and challenges of cities and public agencies and has become an expert in providing strategic counsel on communications programs throughout the project development process. Chester's experience allows him to analyze the nuances and complexities of projects and develop approaches and solutions that provide positive results. Educat ion Bachelor of Arts, Project Experience Sociology and Business Adminlstrat ion, university Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority(Metro), of California at Los State Route 710 North (SR 710)Study, Los Angeles,CA Angeles, 1988 (2016—Present) The SR 710 North was initiated 4 years ago to alleviate mobility Wars With Are11aio constraints in a study area, more than 100 square miles, that Associates encompasses east/northeast Los Angeles and western San Gabriel 25 Valley. Following a rigorous screening and selection process, five 'mars of Experiencealternatives were advanced to the SR 710 North Draft EIR/EIS for 30 further study. The SR 710 North Draft EIR/EIS was circulated for public review and comment in spring 2015. Chester serves a project director Areas of E ertlSe for this effort. He oversees technical services for outreach including • Project Management video and photo production, media coordination, interactive online • strategic Planning communications, and community engagement campaign • Construction Community development. Relations • Federal & state County of Los Angeles, Rosemead Boulevard Complete Streets Environmental Programs Improvement Projects, Rosemead,CA(Oct. 2017—Oct. 2019) • Urban & Regional The County of Los Angeles sought to enhance access for pedestrians, Planning cyclists and transit along 2.6-miles of Rosemead Boulevard between • Creative Material Rush Street in South El Monte to Gallatin Road in the City of Pico Development • online Engagement & Rivera and the Whittier Narrows Recreation area. Chester served as Strategy Development project director. Chester provided strategic coordination with the County of Los Angeles and project team and oversaw implementation of the public outreach effort. C. Britt I Page 1 arellano Metro, Interstate 710(1-710)Air Quality Action Plan(AQAP), Los Angeles County,CA(2010—2013) Chester served as project director for the 1-710 AQAP project, which involves Metro and six project participants conducting an EIR/EIS to analyze the range of possible improvement alternatives for the 1-710 corridor. In this role, he oversaw the implementation of the Public Participation Plan (PPP) and provided direction on strategy and outreach support for the project. The PPP supported the technical project schedule and milestones with ongoing opportunities for two-way communication between Metro, Gateway Cities Council of Governments, local jurisdictions and project stakeholders. Metro,Gold Line Eastside Transit Corridor, Phase 2,San Gabriel Valley,CA(2007—Present) Chester provided strategic oversight for the public outreach effort for the Draft EIR/EIS/Advanced Conceptual Engineering of the Metro Gold Line into East Los Angeles Phase 2 project. He created the comprehensive Public Participation Plan (PPP) for this project, which assisted Metro in processing the 47 alternatives down to three alternatives. In addition, Chester helped Metro execute a "community webinar," targeting East Los Angeles local businesses and college students to provide information about the benefits of light rail projects in their communities. He also led the efforts in developing, implementing, and launching an online, Google-based interactive mapping tool. The interactive map, originally developed for the Metro Eastside Transit Corridor project, has been used on numerous Metro projects to date. The tool allows users to view project areas, zoom into specific areas of interest, "like/comment" on alternatives and variations, as well as "share" comments via Facebook and Twitter. Chester was responsible for oversight and management of the map, which included compiling GIS data files, creating content, identifying map features and layers, and implementing and monitoring protocols for geo-coded comments. In 2018, AA was awarded the Phase 2 B which will release the Supplemental/Recirculation Draft EIS/EIR followed by a Metro Board decision to select a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and approve the completion of the Final EIS/EIR. Chester will continue to provide strategic counsel and oversight as this monumental project nears final approval. Metro, Interstate 605(1-605)Corridor Improvement Project, Los Angeles County, CA (Spring 2016—Present) Arellano Associates has coordinated with Metro, Caltrans District 7 and partner agencies responsible for public and agency scoping and community outreach for the PA/ED phase of the 1-605 Corridor Improvement Project. The purpose of the project is to reduce congestion and improve freeway operations, improve safety, improve local and system interchange operations while minimizing adjacent Right- Of-Way, environmental and economic impacts. In spring of 2020, the outreach transition from traditional public meetings to offer an expansive virtual public hearing experience by using Story Map, an interactive, online mapping tool. Some of the features include, mapping of the alternative design options, right-of-way acquisition and soundwall elements, a full presentation and easy to use commenting platform that allows the public to provide comments during the comment period.The project is currently in the final phase of the environmental process and the AA team is providing full support for the DED circulation, public hearing and documentation process. The environmental phase is slated for completion in fall 2021. Chester has served as the Project Director for the comprehensive outreach program which supports completion of both CEQA and NEPA environmental documents. C. Britt 1 Page 2 General Public Outreach Support AA has extensive experience providing innovative and engaging outreach programs that exceed outreach standards while building community support for projects and programs. Our firm's understanding and appreciation for stakeholder diversity — along with bringing forward the latest innovations in outreach — enables us to work together with clients toward achieving their goals. Over the years, we have established the knowledge, the relationships and the credibility with communities so that we serve as a trusted partner to agencies throughout California. The following is AA's recommended outreach approach, including a standing set of work program elements for potential outreach services. Recommended services would be tailored to address the needs of each Task Order associated with this contract: Work Plan Development and Management For each Task Order assignment, AA will develop a draft work plan specific to the goals, objectives and audiences associated with the assigned highway project. Each work plan will be reviewed and approved prior to implementation. AA's outreach work plan will include the following: • Organization/Team and Contact Information • Decision-Making Flow Chart • Team Member Responsibilities/Duties • Quality Control/Quality Assurance Mechanisms • Overall Work Schedule Stakeholder Database AA staff is skilled in the research and identification of all local and regional stakeholders, including local property owners, local residents, local businesses, professional associations, chambers of commerce, educational institutions, public facilities, major employers, key destinations, elected officials, media, environmental justice groups, community-based organizations and any other sensitive receptors in and around the project area. AA will utilize GIS software to complete community profiles and export parcel data to complement existing databases to compile comprehensive stakeholder databases for the projects. Collateral Development/Graphic Design AA staff has extensive experience with Adobe Creative Suites software as well as general design standards allowing us to quickly and efficiently develop a set of informational and collateral materials designed to support projects in all phases.These materials will be designed for use in briefings, community meetings, events, presentations,etc. Translation Part of our outreach approach is to ensure access to opportunities for stakeholders at all levels. This includes proactively identifying and addressing the language needs of a community. Social Media Content Development and Administration AA understands how important messaging through social media is and how coordinated campaigns can exponentially elevate public awareness and engagement for transportation, planning and infrastructure projects. Supported by AA's Innovations Team, our project manager will develop a fully integrated social media campaign that can take advantage of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Nextdoor, Blogs, podcasts, RSS feeds and a myriad of others as needed. Our staff can distill complex project information into consumable posts as well as create "call-to-action" posts that drive users to a project website or survey. Our team will identify key demographics and will create unique social media ad copy and graphics for each specific platform utilized. Public Workshops, Pop-ups,and Neighborhood Meetings The AA Team has successfully executed hundreds of public workshops, pop-ups and neighborhood meetings throughout Southern California. Our approach to these public engagement opportunities focuses on creating a positive experience that maximizes engagement while minimizing cost. Our meetings and events feature the latest in technology to share information with the public and secure meaningful input. One-On-One Briefings Elected official Briefings are proactive ways to keep elected offices at all levels informed and engaged with the project status. One-on-one or group briefings are especially important in advance of key milestones and prior to engaging the general public. AA will collaborate with the project team to support this effort.The briefings will provide study highlights, updates and public engagement strategies. Stakeholder briefings are another key element of the planning strategies.The AA Team will work with city staff, property owners, businesses, and other interested stakeholders who would benefit from one-on- one briefings. These briefings serve to not only inform but gain valuable feedback from key stakeholders. AA will prepare a list of key stakeholders for each project. Public Input Documentation The AA Team understands the importance of properly documenting public input on all projects and sharing the feedback with the technical team. Public input will be collected from a variety of sources including the project website, designated email, designated phone line, via traditional mail, from stakeholder briefings, and community meetings. AA will develop a public input matrix in Smartsheet to organize scheduled, pending and completed meeting/briefings/input as well as logistics and documentation of these inputs. This matrix will help document and track issues, perceptions, concerns and feelings about the projects/services. AA will also prepare summary reports following stakeholder briefings, community meetings and all survey efforts. Final Reporting Preparation AA will prepare final reports for all outreach efforts conducted. The final reports will serve as a record of all public involvement activities conducted and will summarize community input. AA will attach all deliverables as part of the appendix including but not limited to the project database, mailing/door-to- door distribution maps, meeting notices, meeting materials, presentations, sign-in sheets or meeting participant reports, meeting summaries, social and digital advertisements, surveys, survey translations, survey response, and survey reports. Addressing Today's Health Challenges-COVI D-19 The AA Team is ready to collaborate with the technical team to determine the most appropriate format for these traditionally in-person public engagement opportunities, especially given today's health concerns and social distancing guidelines. AA is well versed in digital tools designed to engage, inform and solicit community feedback. Using our toolbox of virtual outreach methods, AA can address these health concerns and government regulations regarding in-person interactions. AA has highly qualified staff with a track record of successfully conducting online outreach programs and hosting live online meetings as well as virtual workshops with no in-person audience. Other Enhancements and Innovative Tools Since its formation, AA has focused on researching and utilizing the latest communication tools and services to maximize stakeholder engagement and add value to projects, with a focus on innovation and technology. The use of technology in our outreach programs is an essential, cost-effective, and a fun way to engage a wide-range of stakeholders. To that end, we have assembled a designated department of specialists, the AA Innovations Team, dedicated to serve as creative and technology experts for all projects and clients. The innovations team consists of three branches: ✓ Creative Graphics&Video ✓ Social Media Programs ✓ Technology Tools This team works to bring AA's technology toolbox to life on projects, which includes the use of creative and visual design software, video and audio tools, webcast, webinars, virtual meetings, digital interactive mapping, survey and polling platforms, online comment forums, digital notification and awareness, social media programs and demographic engagement targeting. In addition to this in-house toolbox, the AA Innovations Team has the ability to understand and implement other new and emerging digital platforms and technologies that clients and teaming partners bring to us. Our diligence in exploring and implementing emerging technologies and innovative solutions has positioned AA as an industry leader in digital outreach and engagement and has allowed public engagement to be amplified and an exponential growth in the number of stakeholders that are now able to actively participate in projects. APPENDIX Team Subconsultants: G CAP Services G CAP SERVICES GICAP SERVICES GICAP Sylvia Linn SERVICES Background Ms. Linn has extensive experience in labor compliance monitoring, • analysis,audits,and implementation of compliance-related processes for public sector agencies.She possesses an in-depth,practical knowledge of " the regulatory environment, assessment of operational risks and developing risk mitigation procedures. Ms.Linn is well versed in the tools and resources to enhance monitoring efficiency and works extensively with the cutting-edge technology to streamline the process and reduce risk of error. Ms.Linn's current responsibilities with GCAP Services as the Director of Compliance Relations include payroll/wage determination analysis,and labor compliance monitoring and audits. Education Master of Business Administration,2007 University of Redlands Juris Doctorate,1999 Chapman University School of Law Bachelor of Science,Business Administration,1993 University of Phoenix Employment History GCAP Services, Inc.—Vice President/LC Director 2005—Present WBTB,LLC. -Business Development Officer 2004—2005 Law Offices of Lively&Associates—Legal Analyst 1999-2004 Relevant Experience ❖ Manage labor compliance monitoring for major highway transportation projects, city infrastructure improvement, and light rail project. Support projects from Pre-Bid through Closeout. Identify and manage federal Davis-Bacon and state DIR regulatory compliance requirements for agencies, prime contractors,and subcontractors. ❖ Responsible for overseeing and managing the labor compliance officer responsibilities for construction related contracts and providing oversight of the labor wage monitoring and labor compliance functions for consultant related contracts. ❖ Supported major transportation authority with labor compliance monitoring using LCPtracker (web-based application) to review contractor and subcontractor compliance with prevailing wage, benefit, and apprentice requirements. Responsibilities included weekly payroll reviews, jobsite interviews, and status reporting. Monitoring duties also entailed ongoing communication with Authority(agency)and contractor/subcontractors. ❖ Extensive experience monitoring and reporting on public works project subject to CDBG funding requirements. Comprehensive understanding of Section 3/HUD reports (HUD 5.7, HUD-2516, and HUD-60002)reporting requirements. Provided guidance to various City agencies in helping to complete reporting requirements. ❖ Perform audit of internal controls for federal and state grants management for major southland transportation authority. Disseminate findings, recommendations, and action plan to capitalize on strengths of current program and correct deficiencies and weaknesses. 1 GICAP SERVICES GICAP Kim Morales SERVICES Background Ms.Morales is a highly organized and detail-oriented analyst with a broad range of construction industry experience. She has a thorough understanding of labor compliance related rules and regulations. Kim has tip44 experience monitoring and ensuring proper wages are paid and �' apprentice ratios are accurate. Ms. Morales has worked with ;.iel '`K - ) `1 subcontractors and client auditors to resolve labor compliance related I'r`, ,,, issues. Kim's responsibilities at GCAP include certified payroll review for • • w." ., major public works transportation projects, field interviews, and compliance reporting. Education Santiago Canyon College Classes OCEMS EMT Accreditation EMT Certificate Employment History GCAP Services, Inc. 2017—Present Senior Labor Compliance Analyst Atkinsons Contractors, LLC. 2013-2017 Labor Compliance Specialist LCS Constructors,Inc. 2012-2013 Administrative Assistant Relevant Experience ❖ Responsible for review,analysis, and organization of labor compliance related documents(jobsite interview reconciliation, certified payroll document management) for major public works transportation project. Including, report generation and status updates. ❖ Monitor project apprentice ratios. Ensure correct fringe benefits are paid. Resolve all labor compliance related issues with subcontractors and client auditor. Monitor and ensure project workers are receiving the correct prevailing wage amount as determined by the DIR, Davis Bacon Act,and Labor Unions. ❖ Utilized LCPTracker on projects for multiple agencies to audit labor compliance submittals and compile information from the system's myriad reporting features ❖ Prepared reports for CDBG funded projects. Extensive knowledge of reporting requirements, including: Section 3/HUD reports(HUD 5.7, HUD-2516, and HUD-60002). ❖ Organize and maintain labor compliance related files. Ensure compliance with state and federal standards for document management. ❖ Conduct and document field interviews and ensure job-site posters are displayed in the appropriate locations. •:• Conduct and document Commercially Useful Function(CUF) interviews. ❖ Provide administrative support for accounts payable and payroll departments. Developed procedures for clerical staff duties and IT for new employees and client. Manage all company contact information. ❖ Serve as point of contact for various large public works projects. ❖ Responsible for records maintenance, administrative data entry, and managing the submission of timesheets by remote workers. Processed service reports for submission to clients, aggregated daily safety reports,and prepared weekly updates to the field employee schedule. GICAP SERVICES GICAP Stephannie Gabaldon SERVICES Background Ms. Gabaldon has over 10 years of experience as a regulatory requirements analyst, specializing in both public and private sector project support. She is an expert in identifying and resolving deficiencies , 0#, in key requirements, analyzing requirements for proposed solutions, interviewing project stakeholders and personnel at all levels; preparing 111 and maintaining all project related documentation (e.g., requirements, status reports, and recommendations to improve efficiency and 6.0 compliance). Ms. Gabaldon is currently responsible for reviewing contractor and subcontractor certified payroll reports and supporting documents to identify overall compliance with state, federal, and local requirements; analyze, propose and document compliance related solutions. Education Bachelor of Arts,Asian American Studies/Educational Studies Minor UC Irvine, Irvine, CA Employment History GCAP Services, Inc. 2019—Present Labor Compliance Analyst II GCAP Services 2008—2010 Business Analyst Ingram Micro 2006—2007 Marketing Administrator Relevant Experience ❖ Review certified payroll reports for major transportation projects to validate adherence to federal and state regulations. Reconcile jobsite interviews with certified payroll, confirm wage and classification information. ❖ Evaluate apprentice information for compliance with federal and state certifications ratios and wage rates. Ensure that apprentices are appropriately supervised by journeymen with same craft. ❖ Worked on Policy and Procedures / Training and Documentation team for two large-scale County of Orange ERP implementations: a) Human Resources and Payroll Management;and b) General Accounting, and Finance. ❖ Help to facilitate county-wide requirements gathering sessions to identify discrepancies and inconsistencies between current financial and human resource related procedures, and recommended protocols. Compare results to regulatory and system requirements. Document results and collaborate with project stakeholders and department heads to establish viable solutions, reporting deliverables and resources. ❖ Perform requirements gathering and developing functional requirements documentation. Created business process maps and developed proposed solution documents for overall implementation effort. ❖ Documented existing technology, legacy systems,and issue tracking. ❖ Administered post-implementation end-users support and training. GICAP SERVICES GCAP Benjamin Novoa SERVICES Background Mr. Novoa has over 5 years of experience in a variety of administration, Ott coordination,and analysis roles.Ben is responsible for supporting GCAP's labor compliance related consulting projects within the public contracting area. This includes analysis of labor compliance data, developing spreadsheets, logging information, as well as developing and _i A maintaining reports. Mr. Novoa's analytical skills and ability to work in a r "1 fast-paced environment allows him to adopt to new concepts,delivering optimal solutions to clients. He has conducted analysis of project data, scheduled meetings and events, and provided support to project AA • , ; managers. Ben is skilled in utilizing labor compliance monitoring cloud- based systems, providing data analysis, and assisting with compliance management, including data entry and review. Ben has experience providing effective support on multiple projects simultaneously. Current responsibilities include reviewing contractor and subcontractor certified payroll reports and supporting documents to identify overall compliance with state,federal, and local requirements as well as performing jobsite interviews. Ben is fluent in English and Spanish. Education Bachelor of Arts,Business Administration California Baptist University, CA Associates Degree,Business Administration Los Angeles City College, CA Employment History GCAP Services,Inc.—Labor Compliance Analyst I Present GCAP Services,Inc.—Project Administrator/Intern 2018-2020 Los Angeles Trade-Tech College—Office Administration 2017-2018 Qualified Billing&Collections—Verification Coordinator 2015-2017 Relevant Experience ❖ Performed certified payroll verification tasks utilizing LCPtracker labor compliance tracking software. Reviewed employee utilization reports, verified apprentice certifications and confirmed receipt of trustee reports and trust fund letters. ❖ Check contractor public works registration status with the Department of Industrial Relations. Reconcile jobsite interviews with certified payroll,confirm wage and classification information. ❖ Performed general office administration duties including mail correspondence, photocopying,filing,and data entry. ❖ Worked with customer service department to resolve issues concerning missing vital information from patients scanned requisition record. ❖ Reviewed patients' case and insurance coverage information to personalize the call contents to each patient. Proposed Labor Compliance Staff The table below identifies the names, titles, proposed duties, and relevant experience of each team member performing the labor compliance monitoring defined in the scope of work. Key Personnel Relevant Experience Name&Job Title Proposed Duties Sylvia Linn • Review all deliverables to ensure • Responsible for overseeing and Vice President/ regulatory compliance and managing the labor compliance Labor Compliance adherence to procedures prior to officer responsibilities for Director submittal construction related contracts and • Oversight and guidance for all LC providing oversight of the labor areas of the engagement wage monitoring and labor • Research and interpret laws, compliance functions. codes, and regulations • Present labor compliance • Obtain applicable State and requirements at Pre-Construction Federal wage classification meetings. decisions • Supported major transportation • Provide technical assistance to authority with labor compliance contractors as needed monitoring to review contractor and subcontractor compliance with prevailing wage, benefit, and apprentice requirements. • Developed Labor Compliance procedures Kim Morales • Review and audit certified payroll • Responsible for review, analysis, and Senior LC Analyst for each period and provide organization of labor compliance apprenticeship program oversight related documents (jobsite • Monitor all requirements for DIR interview reconciliation,certified submissions Provide technical assistance to payroll document management) • contractors including report generation and • Identify prevailing wage violations status updates. and prepare corrective action • Monitor project apprentice ratios. plans • Ensure correct fringe benefits are • Prepare monthly compliance paid. reports Assist with LC close-out reports • Resolve all labor compliance related • issues with subcontractors and client auditor. • Monitor and ensure project workers are receiving the correct prevailing wage amount as determined by the DIR, Davis Bacon Act, and Labor Unions. • Utilized LCPTracker on projects for Key Personnel Relevant Experience Name&Job Title Proposed Duties multiple agencies to audit labor compliance submittals and compile information from the system's myriad reporting features. • Conduct and document field interviews and ensure job-site posters are displayed in the appropriate locations. Stephannie • Monitor certified payroll reports • Review certified payroll reports for Gabaldon • Monitor all requirements for DIR major transportation projects to LC Analyst/Field submissions validate adherence to federal and Interviewer • Maintain project file directory state regulations. • Assist with collection, review and • Reconcile jobsite interviews with verification of various labor certified payroll, confirm wage and compliance forms classification information. • Assist with creation of pre-bid/ • Evaluate apprentice information for pre-proposal materials compliance with federal and state certifications ratios and wage rates. • Ensure that apprentices are appropriately supervised by journeymen with same craft. • Organize and maintain labor compliance related files. Ensure compliance with state and federal standards for document management. Ben Novoa • Maintain project file directory • Reconcile jobsite interviews with LC Analyst/Field • Conduct jobsite interviews certified payroll, confirm wage and Interviewer • Reconcile interviews with certified classification information. payroll reports • Evaluate apprentice information for • Assist with collection, review and compliance with federal and state verification of various labor certifications ratios and wage rates. compliance forms • Ensure that apprentices are • Administrative duties as needed appropriately supervised by journeymen with same craft. • Organize and maintain labor compliance related files. Ensure compliance with state and federal standards for document management. Submitted To 44r6-f4h11CITY OF ROSEMEAD � OSE EAD City Clerk's Office rod,,,..Sn,.I11 IIIl,,,A111(111(.1 8838 E. Valley Blvd q Rosemead, CA 91770P Wim" Metro Attn: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk s' TECHNICAL M , 4 -f l''''' k„.,.: PROPOSAL CIVIC PRIDE �� •7 for RFP No. 2020-11 '.Nil "`°RPoR` D Project Management Services Related To SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects \,, .iot-.•,3. ,. 44' .: 7,,:/,. . . ; . . -• J: - ... , jY 1. � ° w I I _ — — r;a. * 7 ii • ROSE41 AD CITY HALL 'i.41/ 3) ' j E6 9 E %ALLEY BLVD ->t•'' `�, r. 1 r'' I t TRANS TECh i Est. 1989 .._ Submitted By ' f,—i ' j{r] e./R1Y 04 _ 2, h.. TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC. , _ -_ : r _ +` " ` j � `* . 4 ,rte ,, - * `• — �� , Contact Person for this Proposal: '. ,• ` Ahmad Ansari, PE, Principal • ' . _' ' _ ._ E: ahmad.ansari@transtech.org - . ." L.° , . , . �• r i:._ ,* *,+- ..... ... •. p1. -x'4.1 C: 949-702-5612 _ 0: 909-595-8599 Transtech.org Due Date:01-14-21,2 pm — ; • -; Submittal includes 5 bound copies& s ti 4. 1 electronic PDF �' ._ Transtech Services and Actions COVID-19 & CORONAVIRUS UPDATE Transtech Responds to Recent Health Concerns & Economic Challenges On behalf of the Transtech Team,we would like to take this time to let you know that we are closely monitoring the events, and assure our current client Cities and all Cities, City Staff,and the community that the Transtech Team is fully committed and standing by your organization and community during this critical time. Transtech is here for the City's needs as they continue to navigate through and monitor the novel coronavirus(COVID-19)situation. Whether or not we are your current vendor, or our service is on an "on-call" basis,we are available to support you.We are here for you if and when you need us. At Transtech, the safety and well-being of Transtech Team Members and our client Cities is always our priority, and we recognize the important role we play in providing services to our client Cities during this critical time. Internally, we have issued notices to all our Transtech Team Members working inside City Halls, field project sites, and across our Transtech Offices emphasizing social distancing, following CDC preventative guidelines, and staying home if feeling sick. Protective gear, including masks and gloves have been made available to all Transtech Team Members. Furthermore, relevant CDC guidelines and recommended posters have been posted throughout our offices. Additionally, we have created a designated email, health@transtech.org; in which any email sent to this address will be distributed to our management team.This in effect is our own activated Emergency Operations Center(EOC)to effectively deal with the ongoing developments as they may arise—please feel free to email us with any information,24-7. Adapting Our Services to Our Current Client Cities In addition to the above items, below are highlights of our response to our current client Cities and how we are adapting and customizing our services as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic. ✓ Transtech has long implemented all necessary and vital electronic tools,software and remote workflows to provide its services.Having such tools and software deployed,Transtech has been able to provide essential services with no service disruption to its client Cities during COVID-19. ✓ All Transtech personnel have work laptops and smartphones.Transtech's virtual workstations and cloud servers allow all Transtech personnel to work remotely virtually anywhere. ✓ Transtech utilizes Microsoft Teams virtual video/audio meeting system,and conducts client meetings virtually with all stakeholders. ✓ Transtech retains all work files electronically on its cloud servers,providing real-time access to all project stakeholders. Ease of access to information provided by Transtech minimizes face to face meetings during COVID-19. ✓ Transtech utilizes electronic/online bid management systems providing electronic bid/proposal submittal options, which eliminates or minimizes City walk-ins.Transtech has helped some of our client Cities transition to fully electronic bid/proposal submittals during City Hall closures. ✓ Transtech has implemented electronic/online permit issuance portal at no additional cost to its various client City's Building&Safety and Public Works Departments. ✓ Transtech has been instrumental in adopting electronic plan check workflows by using its own electronic plan check system to its various client City's Building&Safety and Public Works Departments at no additional cost.Transtech team has prepared and successfully implemented custom plan check portals for their client Cities and has delivered electronic plan checks throughout City Hall closures during COVID-19. ✓ During electronic permit and plan check system implementations to its client Cities,Transtech staff worked closely with City Finance and IT Departments to implement electronic/online payment workflows,and provided training to City Staff to eliminate any service disruption. ✓ Above tools and services have been implemented at no additional cost to our client Cities. This service will also be extended to new cities at no additional cost. ✓ Virtual Inspections have been implemented on a case by case basis for occupied buildings and home inspections by our Building and Safety Department. ✓ Building inspections continue for non-occupied structures. ✓ We have set up designated toll-free numbers with assigned operators and email distribution lists for continuity of virtual government services. Transtech Engineers, Inc.was highlighted in the recently published APWA Southern California Chapter's Insight Magazine Article detailing our virtual solutions during the pandemic and our response to COVID,several of our client cities have already implemented with great success(starting on page 6 of magazine) https://apwasocal.partica.online/apwa-socal-insight/socal-insight-2020-issue-1/flipbook/6/ ________ NgiliiiiiiiM RESPONDING TO COVID-19 TRANSTECH DEVELOPS VIRTUAL SOLUTIONS FOR MUNICIPAL CLIENTS IN"NEW NORMAL" i(onorno d Imm page 6-rrnn,dSoluiirn..r MELISSA DEMIRCI.RSP I PROJECT MANAGER,MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING 8 BUILDING SERVICES I TRANSTECI I Benefits of Having a Live Virtual Plan --_J._ .- _-.._- -._-. -_ .. -.- Check Counter Appointments: �� r, « • Provides a Ic ency, Construction 'Commumry " ' i • Expedites plan checking processing Management Electro +-,... Development .. er"^,,,a times, Planer r - d ` �'` '?+• ..;.:, port, / \ / • Minimizes hardcopy and , , • , • idle time of transmission 1114 Eliminates idle , deliveries. ,j-- .."� ' ti Works\ �6"-i •' - D g �' • VirtualWorks,Community \\\\\\ Clod Live Public Wo + 4 •r '� _ es - Development,Planning,and Building 'I -t Lfvevirtual 'at._- 2, / ` -;� �� ' �_ - and Safety Appointment Platform: - • Z ;.• Plan Check • .:, r • ......,,,._.• ..,..,__ r .:•_ „. ---- -- Transtech has also set up virtual appoint- ment counter s ' ment platforms for various City Depart- la - Meetings , ' TRANSTECl/ ,_ "r`r awld'� -- .,,�; ments including the Public Works,Com- rw + . 4L 1N9 iu� &Sah tr munity Development,Planning,and Building and Safety , " Mr— , 1855)595-2495 s ; -. Live Virtual Plan Check Counter Appointment Platform: Departments based on their needs and operations.With the W r ,r - . d .� $. `"' info@transtech.org -•r-- Transtech has established a live virtual plancheck counterhelp of such platforms,City Staff have been able to elimi- ' Transtech.org -,' for meeting appointments directly between applicants and nate or minimize any physical interaction,but still provide r ,. �► - rte r , .l plan checkers.This includes an interactive online appoint- these necessary services by utilizing the virtual appointment �r , ;4 • ` d 4, ,. v�r��_ • , ment booking platform,which has been customized for the platform.The system allows the applicant to select the pre- needs r i4 i - Grant ° ' of the City through their webpage. t 'k. I r,,,,rfared dates/times of available counter hours on an automat- --a--' e� i, Writin 1-‘,C etit + + +,�„ z g r f. " Here is How it Works' ed system,and books the City Staff automatically via the °% 5I. 47e� % . Applicants directly book and schedule appointments platform for the virtual meetings.On the platform.depending �� � ..-;=---4,. on the City's needs and operations,the forms can be tai- ,•'' ."7:77-..-. , �4'f during available counter hour times and dates that pop r ® .+�►.�' `.�! ^.`.. '4..... up on the calendar. loved to ht into the Department's operations to obtain neces- sary information from the applicant. On behalf of our team at Transtech,we sincerely hope you. We quickly engaged with the municipalities we serve to • Once an appointment is booked, Live Virtual Inspections and Drone your colleagues.and your loved ones are safe,healthy,and transform"in-person-services to a fully integrated virtual the applicant receives an auto- 6, no well during these challenging and unprecedented times. stop during the recent closures of City Halls. mated confirmation email with the " `. I Inspections:As part of our continued Working in a mixed City Staff and consultant environment, meetingdetails. commitment to offer virtual options, Prior to the pandemic,Transtech successfully integrated an we have all experienced how this pandemic has impacted t we have introduced Drone and Virtual electronic plan check portal submission platform for several • Applicants City Services and their daily interactions with their communi- pp'cants can easily edit. Inspections to several of our Client municipalities.Applicants can now directly upload their change,reschedule,or cancel .= ties.Public agencies and municipalities are balancing theirCities.Our inspectors are now able to resources to appropriately address ongoing public health plans onto the portal for Electronic Plan Check submittals. their appointment at any time. perform Drone as well as Live Virtual These portals are easily accessed through City Websites challenges while continuing to provide services with as little with direct online login credentials to upload plans that auto- • When their appointment time 41.' Inspections for certain types of work. interruption as possible. y get transmitted and matched with the appropriate comes,the applicant accesses We are utilizing drones for certain matically over 30 years,Transtech has specialized in municipal plan checker based on the type of plan check needed. the video conference call by click- - . r types of inspections.Additionally,we consulting services for multiple City Departments.We have These platforms are easily customized with the City logos, ing on the confirmation link sent 416 • ��r� are utilizing Microsoft Teams Video seen how some of the City services will no longer be able to colors,and any other information or graphics the City wish- to them. Conferencing where we have ar- operate as they once did,especially during City Hall do- es to include. ranged for our field inspectors to communicate with our sen- • From there the applicant is connected directly with their sures-namely any"in-person"services providing counter for inspectors to properly inspect field conditions. related assistance-which meant the issuance of permits, During the early stages of the pandemic,we quickly Bevel- plan checker to review their plans and go over any com- pian checking,and inspections.Collectively.we developed oped additional virtual capabilities introducing and imple- ments or questions they have. The efficiency of these systems mentingthe followingvirtual services: Et1 allows us to implement and build them for any City directly from -friendly format adhering to current public health guidelines. • Live Virtual Plan Check and Permit Technician Counter share their screens to review the plans and any other our offices.If anything in this arti- Our firm has developed and adapted virtual services to con- Appointment Platform necessary documents. cle sounds interesting,and you tinue meeting the needs of the • Live Virtual Public Works,Community Development, • Transtech has also coordinated the designated appoint- would like to see a demo of any communities we serve integrating Planning,and Building and Safety Appointment Platform ments with the applicants to ensure that the permit tech- virtual services,or have us set many technological assets within nician is available in real time to check the City Permit Request a Demo up mock portals for your agency, the Public Works,Community • Live Virtual Inspections and Drone Inspections documents if needed. please feel free to reach us by Development,Planning,and phone at J8551595-2495 or via email at infot itranstech.oro Building and Safety Departments. I(ononnrdern pew 7-i,rroo!,So iom) Transtech is a 2020 Gold Chapter Sponsor. This is their third year as a Gold sponsor. 6 7 Transtech Engineers, Inc.was highlighted in the recently published APWA Southern California Chapter's Insight Magazine Article detailing our virtual community engagement approach for Public Works Projects during COVID(starting on page 8 of magazine) https://apwasocal.pa rtica.online/apwa-socal-insight/socal-insight-2020-issue-2/flipbook/8/ WirlE11111MINE RESPONDING TO COVID-19 WEST COVINA&TRANSTECH LEAD VIRTUAL COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FOR PW PROJECTS rr.,,,rn,t,din,,,,,+,gra.r,m,,,lSheromei that the virtual workshop and meeting MELISSA DEMIRCI.RSP I PROJECT MANAGER.MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING&BUILDING SERVICES I TRANSTECH would be open and live. businesses closed to the public,the City r II . A, ke 4 had to quickly notify the residents that the = • The Virtual Wo kshop and Meeting workshop and meeting were going to be went live! Q *t postponed to a later date. The Results and Success( g,i , f UnderthedirectionofCityManagement, At the end of the community workshop and I theTranslechTeamquicklymobilizedand ` , �;I, meeting,there were a total of 83 partici-developedaroadmaptoconductthework- pants between the different phases. Simi- 1 „ .). 1t y shop and meeting virtually while still beinglar in-person community outreach gather- f... # I ^ both interactive and engaging.The City ings may have yielded fewer participants was committed to continue the engage- ...4,-.-..,-..= when held on a typical weekday evening. 1 � ment and move the projects forward for the ‘ The key to the success of the workshop community. �, 1West Covina's and meeting was being able to collect feed- Virtual Community Workshop and Meet- Virtual Community back and the interactive portion with the il Jna Roadmap: participants to be able to effectively capture A.' Sf - Meetings& the community input and quantify those til- • A designated website domain was cre- ated which had individual project pag- es that could be easily accessed from workshop and meeting live and online for a a desktop,laptop,tablet,or cell phone. two-week period.24 hours a day,where participants could participate on their own in!". • A step by step guide on how the inter- time. f 4 active workshop was going to be con- Both projects were successfully approved R ducted was posted on the website. including links to a pre-recorded by City Council with the support of the com- munity. Transtech Engineers has been providingmunicipal consult- ducted for each project separately to collect feedback from presentationd by and dronenesurvey footage of the areas.anttofillTfils was 9 p p I p y followed an online for participants out. Moving forward,a hybridgfuch of unityg a age- ing services to Public Works Departments for over 30 years. the residents and explore the potential options and and in-person meeting for future community engage- As we have transitioned to our"new normal",Transtech has measures. • New and updated notices were prepared and physically ment may be the answer to engage with more partici- developed and adapted innovative virtual services integral- These meetings were scheduled to take place the 2n°week mailed to the residences with the direct links and dates pants who may not be able to attend designated fin- ing many technological assets within the Public Works, of March at the City's Senior Center.By February,all notic- person times.This approach also Community Development,Planning,and Building and Safe- es of the community meetings and workshops with dates, Step 2:1st Community Workshop Presentation 1(Part 1) allows for actual data collection ty Departments. times,and locations were physically mailed for both projects that can be analyzed through The example below is one of their recent experiences encompassing a total of over 1.800 individual residences. ..;..7.:z.:.:.;:.::.::'.. . online surveys. providing virtual services to a community. The very week the community workshop and meeting was ' ....—P-=.—..-• ,r'Community wo'k`s°°vb`°a°"mor,or� Virtual solutions like this provide The City of West Covina Virtual Community WorkshoQ scheduled,LA County announced the"Safer at Home"or- an effective and powerful option for cities to continue their public and Meeting; der.With City Halls,Public Agencies,and non-essential H The City of West Covina is home to over ��, y��i -' n AN w•, and community engagement for 106,000 residents. This makes community + 1�1�`s 0 Public Works projects during our new norms where in-person engagement particularly important for the City ► - as new projects come through,especially ° meetings may not be possible.If when improvements are adjacent to residential you want to learn more about areas or schools.The City began the initial t)ovmoaUo Par copy a nc�acsp xatam Transtech's virtual solutions. phases of two Public Works projects.Both of !: please feel free to contact us. We can be reached by phone at these locations were nestled tightly in between 91-9^S' (855)595-2495 or via email at residential areas near a school serving as the t.__._.- info@transtech.org. main outlet for the residents.During the initial 1 phases of the project development there was ® Transtech is a 2020 Gold tremendous community interest for these two Chapter Sponsor This is their ‘mii locations. R . third year as a Gold sponsor. Initial traffic studies were completed to deter- /j mine the best traffic engineering measures a trona woc°rootage of Citrus Si s Cameron Ave which would address the community needs.At ._.,-...-. .,, " ,- the direction of City Council and City Manage- ment,it was determined that as part of community outreach (Continued on page v-rvisal Solutions, efforts,a community workshop and meeting should be con- ► o 8 9 Cover Letter 1 Corp.HQ:13367 Benson Ave Chino, / January 14, 2021 www.transnstechoech.org 855.595.2495(toll-free) City of Rosemead 1I?,4IVSTECII City Clerk's Office 8838 E.Valley Blvd Est. 1989 Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11: Project Management Service Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects Transtech is pleased to submit this proposal for the subject services. This Cover Letter provides an executive summary of our qualifications. This Cover Letter serves as an Executive Summary of our Proposal. Established in 1989, Transtech is a full-service Municipal Consulting Firm providing services to approximately 50 agencies. Established in 1989, Transtech (a California Corporation) is a multi-disciplinary engineering consulting firm. Transtech is currently providing municipal services to approximately 50 agencies, and has extensive experience working in a mixed staff/consultant environment for over 30 years. Our service capabilities include. • Building&Safety Services, Building Inspection, Plan • City Engineer, City Traffic Engineer, Check, Building Evaluations, City Building Official, Code Development Review, Public Works Enforcement Engineering, Plan Check, Inspection • Civil Engineering, Freeways and Interchanges, Local • Traffic and Transportation Planning and Streets and Roads, Sewerage, Water and Storm Drain, Engineering Pavement Management System, Grading Studies • Labor Compliance • Staff Augmentation • Planning Support • CIP Program Management • Water Resources Engineering • Construction Management and Inspection; Federally • Surveying, Mapping,ALTA, Right-of-way Funded Project Management Engineering • Grant Writing • Emergency and Disaster Response, Support • CDBG Project Management and Recovery Services We have extensive Experience in working with LACMTA (METRO), CALTRANS and LOS ANGELES COUNTY that will be involved in the review, permitting, and approval of these projects. The improvements at 1-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Westbound Ramps (Project ID: MR4.1.2.08), and at I- 10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway Westbound Ramps (Project ID: MR4.1.2.09) are within Caltrans' jurisdiction, and will require plan review, processing, approvals and permits through Caltrans. Also, Rosemead Boulevard is a State Route under Caltrans' jurisdiction. All traffic signal improvements along Rosemead Boulevard will also go TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11 TRANSTECI! Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects Cover Letter 2 require plan review, processing, approvals and permits through Caltrans. Another important element of the Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Improvements is coordination with Los Angeles County for the following projects: • Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project, Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead (Project ID: MR4.3.2.19) • Traffic Signal Improvements, San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley (Project ID: MR4.3.2.20) As indicated in ATTACHMENT G-2, SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS of the Agreement with METRO and the City the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) will be an active participant in this project with coordination of the City's overall traffic signal management system development and integration to the Countywide information exchange network (IEN). Coordination with the LACDPW will maximize the regional arterials corridor traffic operational performance and minimize any potential conflicts. Our team includes experienced staff members who have worked for and/or with LACMTA (METRO), CALTRANS and LOS ANGELES COUNTY, and are intimately familiar with the standards and procedures, project development and approval process, staff and funding requirements of these agencies. • Ali F. Zaghari, PE, PMP, Support for Coordination with Caltrans, Caltrans Encroachment Permit Processing and METRO. Mr. Zaghari has over 35 years of experience in Transportation Management&Operations in various capacities at Caltrans. His career path includes a number of key managerial positions in Caltrans leading to his last position as the Deputy District Director for Traffic Operations at Caltrans District 7 in Los Angeles. Mr. Zaghari was the lead Caltrans representative on the 1-210 Connected Corridors (Integrated Corridor Management) study involving Caltrans, County of Los Angeles, and the four cities of Pasadena, Arcadia, Monrovia and Duarte providing direction for the system management and ITS architecture for this first pilot project in San Gabriel Valley. • Bahman Janka, PE, Support for Coordination with Caltrans, County, Metro's TAC and Metro's Arterial ITS Committee. Mr.Janka has over 35 years of experience in Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning. He has served in City Traffic Engineer and Transportation Administrator positions for the Cities of Santa Clarita and Pasadena and, and has coordinated with Los Angeles County and San Gabriel Valley cities on regional Traffic Signal/ITS systems. He was instrumental in consultant and system provider selection for the Adaptive Traffic Signal System in Pasadena, which is a very similar component to the task in the Rosemead Mobility Improvements Project. He served for ten years as the Chair of Metro's Streets and Freeways Subcommittee advising Metro TAC and Metro Board on various Transportation and ITS issues. He is also a member of Metro's Arterial ITS Committee providing input on ITS needs and functionality of the systems in the Metro region. He served for 7 years on the 1-210 Connected Corridors (Integrated Corridor Management) Project involving Caltrans, Los Angeles County, and the four cities of Pasadena, Arcadia, Monrovia and Duarte on system management and organization of this first pilot project in San Gabriel Valley. He has extensive experience working in collaboration with Los Angeles County Metro ITS Committee and has worked closely with Caltrans and LA County Technical Staff, who will be involved in the 710 MIP Projects at various levels, including review and approval and integration of the selected ITS TS into County-wide system. • Mike Benyamin, PE,Support for Coordination with Caltrans, Caltrans Encroachment Permit Processing and METRO. Mr. Benjamin has over 30 years of experience in Project Development and Management and Local Assistance Engineering at Caltrans, including as Caltrans Local Assistance Engineer managing programs and projects for local agencies, Project Initiation Documents (PID), Project Approval and Environmental Documents (PA&ED), Plan Specification and Estimates(PS&E), and Construction of the Projects. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11 TRANSTECH Protect Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects Cover Letter 3 We have extensive experience in the local area and project requirements and processes, as well as working as an extension of City staff, providing services in similar capacities with minimal direction from City staff. One of the unique qualifications of Transtech and its staff is that we work as Contract City Engineers, Traffic Engineers and Project Managers for several agencies. We have extensive experience working with Public Agencies in similar assignments, including experience in dealing with Public Agency Staff, Council, and Commissions. We are accustomed to working with governmental agencies, and have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures, and policies. We are accustomed to working with local and regional agencies, and have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures, and policies. Our Sr. Level Project Staff includes: • Ahmad Ansari, PE, Contract Principal. Mr. Ansari, a Principal at Transtech, provides any contractual or technical support and QC/QA if and when needed. Mr.Ansari has over 30 years of past experience in City and County Public Works and has worked at several municipalities in Southern California at executive management level, City of Moreno Valley- Public Works Director/City Engineer, City of Rialto- Public Works Director/City Engineer, City of Perris-Public Works Director,City of Pomona- Deputy Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer. • Ali Cayir, PE, Program and Project Management Support. Mr. Cayir has over 35 years of experience in engineering. He has participated on numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the planning and development of civil and traffic engineering, urban and rural development, and public works projects. He served as Principal Project Manager for the design,construction and management of a variety of projects. Mr. Cayir served as contract City Engineer, Traffic Engineer and Interim Public Works Director for many municipalities in Southern California. He has a broad knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public,various city departments,city council and other governmental agencies. Our staff includes experienced engineers, contract administration, public relations staff members, who have managed numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the planning, engineering, entitlement, environmental permitting, development and construction of numerous similar public works projects, including projects funded through METRO Funds. • David Ragland,PE,PLS, QSD, QSP,Engineering, QC/QA Support. Mr. Ragland is a civil engineer and land surveyor has over 30 years of diverse experience in a wide variety of projects in civil engineering. He has managed numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the planning, engineering, entitlement, environmental permitting, development and construction of urban and rural development, and public works projects. • Michael Ackerman, PE, QSD, QSP, QISP, Engineering Review Support. Mr. Ackerman has over 20 years of experience. At Transtech, he has been working as a Sr. Engineer at various Transtech City Engineering Contracts. He has served at various Cities underTranstech's City Engineering Contracts, including Temple City, Huntington Park, and Alhambra. Mr. Ackerman managed Engineering and CIP, attended and coordinated with COG Regional Transportation Planning, GWMA Gateway Water Management Association, and Los Angeles Upper Reach 2 Storm Water Management Group. He is very familiar with the local and regional agencies and goals. He has a broad knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public,various city departments, city council and other governmental agencies. • Craig Melicher, PE, Project Management, QC/QA Support. Mr. Melicher has approximately 35 years of experience. Mr. Melicher has served in various capacities, such as City Engineer, and CIP Manager for various Cities. Mr. Melicher also served as Principal Program Manager for a wide variety of projects. 117-0 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11 TRANSTECh Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects Cover Letter 4 Depending on the specific project, Mr. Melicher's services included everything from initial concept to project close-out. He has a broad knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public, various city departments, city council and other governmental agencies. • Melissa Demirci, RSP, Public Relations, Funding, Management Support. Ms. Demirci has 10 years of experience in Traffic&Transportation Analyst,Project Manager,Associate Engineer,Transportation Grant Writer. She has worked in the Public Works Department and assists in the preparation of staff reports, contract administration, RFP preparation, CIP Budget preparation, bid analysis, budgeting. She is well versed in Caltrans and Local Assistance construction filing and document system. She has prepared several transportation related grant applications and helped facilitate over $20 million in funding for clients' public works and transportation improvement projects. We have extensive experience with LACMTA (METRO) 710 North MIPs, and Measure R Funding Program and Requirements. Cash flow management,timely reporting and reimbursement submittals, accurate and proper documentation of eligible expenses are critical to maintain a steady cash flow and minimizing City's cash outlay, as well as avoiding any audit issues at the end of these projects. The 710 North MIPs are funded by Measure R Funds, and the expenditures will be paid on a reimbursement basis by submitting Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report, with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required. METRO will withhold 5% of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. We work closely with METRO and manage several local projects for Local Cities where we serve as City Engineers and Project Managers. Our Team also assisted several local agencies in preparing project funding documents for over $300 million of funding for the SR 710 North MIPs, for which we had also prepared funding applications and assisted our client cities in obtaining these funds for local projects. Our team also includes Avant-Garde, Inc., a well-known expert grant coordination consultant, with extensive experience in working with METRO and managing Grant Programs for many local agencies. Avant-Garde has been one of Transtech's exclusive Funding Support Consultant. They provide administrative responsibilities such as assistance with the preparation and monitoring of the operating budget and Capital Improvement Program budget, and work with METRO and various other funding agencies in completing appropriate form and reports to ensure that the clients are in compliance with grant requirements and reimbursement are received in a timely manner. • Lissette Montoya,Measure R Fund Quarterly Reports,Reimbursement,FTIP Program Updates Support. Ms. Montoya has approximately 20 years of experience, and works closely with METRO and other Funding Agencies. She provides funding administration to ensure that cities develop their projects in accordance with policy and procedural requirements, assists in determining eligible projects, and manages various Cities' funding programs with METRO. Ms. Montoya is proficient in managing and preparing funding reimbursement requests and reporting through various agencies (FHWA, Metro, Caltrans, HUD) for various multi-million- dollar projects. This includes programing projects in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program, processing of fund exchanges and preparing funding packages to Metro (Call for Projects, Local Return, Discretional Funding),the California Transportation Commission, Caltrans and FHWA. Ms. Montoya also has 410' TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11 TeansrEclr Project Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects Cover Letter 5 experience in public relations coordination, community outreach efforts and community relations, focus group moderation in English and Spanish, business development and event planning. • Megan LeNoue, Measure R Fund Quarterly Reports, Reimbursement, FTIP Program Updates Support. Ms. LeNoue has approximately 7 years of experience. in administrative and municipal program services and contract administration. Her overall experience includes grant research and writing, funding administration, project management and analysis, community outreach support, labor compliance monitoring, and construction management assistance. Ms. LeNoue has worked in conjunction with the project managers of the company and served as a liaison to provide support on various projects. One of her main responsibilities is assisting clients with preparing and administering programs as required by federal and state funding agencies to ensure projects are developed in accordance with policy and procedural guidelines. Ms. LeNoue is proficient in preparing funding reimbursement requests and quarterly reporting through various agencies (FHWA, Metro, Caltrans, CaIOES)for various multi-million-dollar projects. Ms. Montoya and Ms. LeNoue, as a sub to Transtech, prepared FTIP Sheets for approval of several 710 North MIP Projects for various Cities. Discussion regarding relinquishment of Rosemead Blvd, which is under Caltrans Jurisdiction. Municipalities sometimes seek relinquishment of all or portions of state highways running through their jurisdictions to gain local control over the land uses on or adjacent to these roadways and to reduce the cost and delay associated with gaining Caltrans'approval,and being subject to its decisions,whenever changes are sought. Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual, ARTICLE 3 Policies indicate Highways or local roads under Caltrans'jurisdiction that do not serve regional or statewide transportation needs should be relinquished to the appropriate local agency. There are several benefits to relinquishing facilities that are no longer required to serve regional and statewide needs: • An increase in local agencies' responsiveness to community interest in the administration, planning, construction, and operation of facilities, resulting in a cost savings to taxpayers by eliminating the need for State encroachment permits • A reduction of on-going maintenance costs for the State • A reduction in tort liability for the State • A decrease in State incident response efforts • Decreased competition for capital funds for regional and statewide improvements Caltrans is responsible for relinquishing roads well maintained and in operable condition. Major widening or other improvements (except safety improvements) should not be considered if the improvement would cause betterment of the facility beyond the state of good repair. In these cases,the city or county may elect to pay the portion of the cost to upgrade the facility geometrically or structurally over and above that which is justified. When relinquishing a State highway, there may be occasions when it is appropriate for Caltrans to perform construction work or to provide financial contributions to the local agency to ensure that the facility is well maintained and in operable condition. Construction work or financial contributions may be considered if they are in the best interest of the State. • Adjacent segments of Rosemead Boulevard have been relinquished to local jurisdictions. • Rosemead Boulevard through the City of Rosemead maybe a potential candidate for relinquishment. 11011111111111=011111•1 4( .7:0 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11 TRANSTEchf Proj.ct Managamont Sarvlcas Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvamants ProJocts Cover Letter 6 We believe our team is well qualified to perform the services requested. One of the unique qualifications of Transtech and its staff is that we work as Contract City Engineers, Traffic Engineers and Building Officials for several agencies. We have extensive experience working with Public Agencies in similar assignments, including experience in dealing with Public Agency Staff, Council, and Commissions. We are accustomed to working with governmental agencies, and have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures, and policies. We are accustomed to working with governmental agencies, and have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures, and policies. We have extensive experience in managing projects as City staff extension with a turn-key service approach. ✓ Successfully providing similar services to many agencies for over 30 years. / Proven track record in on time and within budget project delivery. ✓ Extensive experience in working with LACMTA (METRO), CALTRANS and LOS ANGELES COUNTY that will be involved in the review, permitting and approval of these projects ✓ Extensive experience in with LACMTA (METRO) 710 North MIPs, and Measure R Funding Program and Requirements ✓ Multi-disciplinary engineering consulting service capabilities with a large pool of experienced staff to provide an array of municipal services. ✓ Ability to work collaboratively with agencies, project applicants, and other stake holders, and communicate effectively with diverse audiences and stakeholders at public forums. ✓ Committed to producing a high-quality work product and deliver a high level of customer care. ✓ Commitment of principal level management and involvement throughout the contract duration. ✓ Well experienced in-house staff readily available to commence with the services upon City's authorization. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Transtech�Engineers,inerInc. logf Ahmad Ansari, PE, Principal E: ahmad.ansari@transtech.org C: 949-702-5612 0: 909-595-8599 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11 TRANSTECh Protect Management Services Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility improvements Protects Table of Contents Our proposal is submitted in the format specified in City's RFP Section I. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL FORMAT. SECTION PAGE 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.1 - 1.14 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING 1.1 SCOPE OF WORK,710 NORTH MIP FUNDING AGREEMENT HIGHLIGHTS,APPROACH 1.7 DISCUSSION REGARDING RELINQUISHMENT OF ROSEMEAD BLVD,WHICH IS UNDER CALTRANS JURISDICTION 1.13 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.1 - 2.39 PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY STAFF 2.2 RESUMES 2.5 3. Company Qualifications 3.1 - 3.19 GENERAL COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS 3.1 EXAMPLES OF PROJECTS REPRESENTATIVE OF TRANSTECH'S DIVERSIFIED EXPERIENCE 3.4 4. References 4.1 - 4.10 5. Standard Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements 5.1 - 5.1 6. Addenda Acknowledgement 6.1 - 6.1 sly, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-71, Project Management SarvleIPs TRANSCH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 1 . Approach and Scope of Work TRANSTECh Est. 1989 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.1 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Through the recent L.A. Metro's 710 North Mobility Study,the City of Rosemead identified and applied for qualifying projects under this program. The City was successful in receiving a total allocation of$27,000,000 for the following four projects: 1. 1-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Westbound Ramp Improvements($6,000,000) PROJECT ID: MR4.1.2.08; PROJECT TYPE 1: Local Street/Road and Freeway Local Interchange Mobility and Operational Improvement Projects 2. 1-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway Westbound Ramp Improvements($6,000,000) PROJECT ID: MR4.1.2.09; PROJECT TYPE 1: Local Street/Road and Freeway Local Interchange Mobility and Operational Improvement Projects 3. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project[Garvey,Valley,San Gabriel,Walnut Grove and Rosemead] ($9,000,000) PROJECT ID:MR4.3.2.19;PROJECT TYPE 3:Intelligent Transportation Systems[ITS]Projects 4. Traffic Signal Improvements [San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley] ($6,000,000) PROJECT ID:MR4.3.2.20;PROJECT TYPE 3:Intelligent Transportation Systems[ITS]Projects The projects were identified, and were awarded LACMTA Measure R funding, as part of a broader package of projects known as the SR-710 Mobility Improvement Projects (MIPS).The SR-710 MIPS are the result of reallocated Measure R Funds for the SR-710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion.These projects are consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR-710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210,with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. In addition to METRO,these projects will require close coordination with Caltrans and County of Los Angeles. The improvements at I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Westbound Ramps (Project ID: MR4.1.2.08), and at I- 10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway Westbound Ramps (Project ID: MR4.1.2.09) are within Caltrans'jurisdiction, and will require plan review, processing, approvals and permits through Caltrans. Also, Rosemead Boulevard is a State Route under Caltrans'jurisdiction. All traffic signal improvements along Rosemead Boulevard will also require plan review, processing, approvals and permits through Caltrans. Another important element of the Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Improvements is coordination with Los Angeles County for the following projects: • Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project, Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead (Project ID: MR4.3.2.19) • Traffic Signal Improvements, San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley (Project ID: MR4.3.2.20) As indicated in ATTACHMENT G-2, SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS of the Agreement with METRO and the City the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) will be an active participant in this project with coordination of the City's overall traffic signal management system development and integration to the Countywide information exchange network(IEN). Coordination with the LACDPWwiII maximizethe regional arterials corridor traffic operational performance and minimize any potential conflicts. i ! i TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECII Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.2 Grantee shall maintain proper records of the existing conditions before and after each MIP to assess the performance of the completed MIP as well as the overall program. A copy of the Before and After Study shall be submitted to LACMTA within six months of completion of the project construction. THE FOLLOWING ARE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS: 1. 1-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Westbound Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) PROJECT ID: MR4.1.2.08; PROJECT TYPE 1: Local Street/Road and Freeway Local Interchange Mobility and Operational Improvement Projects The proposed project involves improvements - _. . ,, , r a to Rosemead Boulevard (SR-164) and Glendon EXISTING t �� Way(approximate postmile:Route 164,LA 5.7) -.•ate - . and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps at ,� i i oft? ''' t '' .. Rosemead Boulevard (approximate postmile: • 1 :y r Route 10, LA 26.8). ' - + , w r + The improvements include geometric1 I + ' realignment and additional lanes to increase • "1 1 . ` capacity, improve traffic flow, and reduce ':' 1 1 t- i congestion at the intersection, which will • ' ;.`. I continue to worsen over time without :',' i _N , improvements. .- r -r' The proposed improvements are as follows: . f �'_ •- 1. Widen east side of Rosemead Boulevard ' _ to add an exclusive right turn lane from :=y — • r �, N PROPOSED�� ► NB Rosemead Boulevard to WB 1-10 a e *. •- Freeway easterly On Ramp. .14. s s s 42. ~-- 2. Add an additional lane for the 1-10 s . . \ Freeway easterly WB Off Ramp. 1 .1',.% ! �� 3. Add an exclusive right turn lane from - I a t t t r; WB Glendon Way to NB Rosemead . - j ..`r Boulevard. \ ( `} 4. Eliminate left turn lane from I-10 �,•. '\1 a t t t w t' t till° Freeway westerly WB Off-Ramp to WB 4, ., , .:; ' i 1 �' Glendon Way. , 5. If determined to be feasible after further x engineering analysis,widen west side of '` "�. ._ .6 ;LU Rosemead Boulevard to provide a wider 4" _, , riht turn lane(current right turn lane is s I- t approx. 10' wide, which is narrow). Widening this right turn lane by 1' or 2' (which will require narrowing the sidewalk,accordingly)would improve the traffic flow. 6. Reconfigure geometric alignment of west approach on Glendon Way west of Rosemead Boulevard and provide a left turn lane for from WB Glendon Way to WB 1-10 Freeway westerly On Ramp. 7. Widen south-west corner of Glendon Way and 1-10 WB westerly On-ramp to provide proper right turn lane and curb return to accommodate right turn traffic onto the ramps. 1' r.,,. / �k% i IIINIMM r. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Project Management Services TRAnsTEcH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.3 2. 1-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements ($6,000,000) PROJECT ID: MR4.1.2.09; PROJECT TYPE 1: Local Street/Road and Freeway Local Interchange Mobility and Operational Improvement Projects The proposed project involves improvements to rEXISTING i , i Walnut Grove Avenue and 1-10 Freeway WB On ��J ' and Off Ramps (approximate postmile: Route 10, —I r: r I' LA26.3). _ - - The improvements include geometric realignment ,. - • i- -r +• +' to increase capacity, improve traffic flow, and f reduce congestion at the intersection, which will Sty 1 "� . :` �'_, { J continue to worsen over time without --- [r ; r x � i improvements. L fw ' g The proposed improvements are as follows: —, 1 1. Realign SB RT Lane from Walnut Grove ° ' ', 3 Avenue to the I-10 Freeway WB On Ramp, :� PI i and install a realigned I-10 Freeway WB On ! r i`•. 1 , t and Off Ramp at Walnut Grove Avenue. `fit i r P 2. Realign striping and north and south 'e, approaches of Walnut Grove Avenue at ,r- realigned 110 Freeway WB On and Off Lti, �` _> Ramp. ra ' '' : •,Z. ie o 2`�' 3. Install new traffic signal at realigned 1-10 — �l Freeway WB On and Off Ramp. PROPOSED, — -Milli . .J . --=r—K r i 1 * - re 1 \ , 7:.- - i fir_ r' 1 ' * t p\ €!. h t t` r ,, ,. •ir s ' C. ae / - „,0 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Project Management Services TR4NSIECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.4 3. Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project[Garvey,Valley,San Gabriel,Walnut Grove and Rosemead] ($9,000,000) PROJECT ID:MR4.3.2.19;PROJECT TYPE 3:Intelligent Transportation Systems[ITS]Projects The project will replace as needed the existing traffic signal PROJECT LOCATION MAP N • controllers with 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and A Aim._Park firmware at signalized intersections along Garvey Avenue, • Valley Boulevard, San Gabriel Boulevard, Walnut Grove Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard and provide fiber optic • •R!lsAlnead •• cable connectivity to all of these traffic signal intersections. The traffic signal controller manufacturer and firmware will • be determined during the design phase and may include e • adaptive traffic control system or traffic responsive m m v' features, as it is appropriate and feasible for this project. • •• The main purpose of the project is to improve traffic operations,mobility,and safety for the major arterials that • run through the City.The project locations include: • • • • • • • • • • Garvey Avenue(9 intersections-W to E city limits) • Valley Boulevard(7 intersections-W to E city limits) 1 San Gabriel Boulevard (6 intersections N to S city limits) • • • • • Walnut Grove Avenue and (16 intersections-N to S • • city limits) • • Rosemead Boulevard (5 intersections - N to S city limits). • The design and implementation of traffic elements and •• _ actual locations will be determined during the design c; phase,which will include the following improvements: wrnm • Replace traffic signal controllers to 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers,and cabinets as required (IBD during Design). • Install fiber optic interconnect along major arterials (new conduits&cables)to improve traffic operations (subject to the design phase). • Install Ethernet switches and fiber optic communications equipment at existing controller cabinets. • Install communication hubs. • Install vehicle detection (e.g. loop,video)systems(IBD during Design). • Design and implement CCTV camera system(IBD during Design). • Update traffic signal timing and traffic signal synchronization to provide optimization of traffic flow for the AM and PM peak hours. • Design and implement a new central traffic signal management system (software and communication equipment)to monitor and control all of the signalized intersections within the City. At the completion of the design phase, the City shall inform the Metro Project Manager of the number of controllers and equipment needed to upgrade the traffic signal system, and the type of traffic control system they will deploy. In addition, the City shall coordinate the system design through Metro staff and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to coordinate with other Metro-funded traffic signal control projects in the immediate and surrounding areas and allow communication with the County of Los Angeles Information Exchange Network(!EN). An important element of this project is coordination with Los Angeles County. As indicated in ATTACHMENT G-2, SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS of the Agreement with METRO and the City the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW)will be an active participant in this project with coordination of the City's overall traffic signal management system development and integration to the Countywide information exchange network (IEN). Coordination with the LACDPW will maximize the regional arterials corridor traffic operational performance and minimize any potential conflicts. ‘.., 4,/ .1 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSJECIf ,,.3,s_._ ` Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.5 IIIIIII%. 1111111 4. Traffic Signal Improvements [San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley] ($6,000,000) PROJECT ID:MR4.3.2.20;PROJECT TYPE 3:Intelligent Transportation Systems[ITS]Projects Rosemead Traffic Signal Improvements: Various CAST,ASAOCNA �f STSAN OABR CL PROJECT LOCATION MAP � locations (San Gabriel, Walnut Grove@ Mission, , PiritE.E } Rosemead and Valley) is an eligible SR-710 North °''' � :";m " ' 'qt`I Corridor Mobility Improvement approved by the ':" red !if ss J Metro Board of Directors on September 26, 2019. .,-, 111 e `' SRN GA6R EL "4.4,...„„, , '„ � La a 4 o ,--.1 _ - 'kL Y, I 1 OC.3 The project contributes to mobility and operational .-•..a.,• q< - ; __ +e a , , ” i i 3 rMr... _ F %i' vo tint cI benefits in the SR-710 corridor between I-10 and I- t " p,, 3. yr ; 1:::„ - , : E 210 consistent with the Purpose and Need of the ;, [ ' "111M111!A ' ' A 1 710 Gap Closure project. .°" ` r= iiPRCJA,C.4.1 ' V3°•� The project will upgrade the traffic signal system „, -� ,,,, ,IR......,, a b^Y M. Mnc. and other components at major intersections to ; ' 0 . , q . Fli,11,...=,111=s9 : E - �i ,•'� improve the traffic operations and mobility in the ` 11 `-- .i �" g. $ ; ] i i 4 / -"""'µF 1 V =} � € i_ a �sonf ErwT.re rsugo__ City. These improvements will be planned and S x t " —1 developed in conjunction with adjacent cities to j , a T r` --"1iI,s' "' 3: 1i5 F H ensure that traffic operations are coordinated = . 1 t' 31. Al F e t©'. through major corridors within the SR-710 area. "°"•' r,�l,�";' 'i 1 Wit= ':;,. TT� SOL'Tll i.T SMITH AM OAORCL I`•— 1 °• The project will upgrade the traffic signal system, 4 .R•_wwww 5 [�� i �� ■ t—L r is and other components at major intersections to ", - i d iIt — •`• J.. 14. ' wwrneRWARP°WS improve the traffic operations and mobility in the i '' m,L City. These improvements will be planned and41,: %®®, . � Yt>NTEBEiI[� r��'�Mf1 I` A, IT-`` developed in conjunction with adjacent cities to ensure that traffic operations are coordinated through major corridors within the SR-710 area. The City plans to install left-turn phasing and overlapping right-turn phasing to improve traffic signal phasing and upgrade existing traffic signals to current standards at the following locations: 1. Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Hellman Avenue: Implement EB/WB protective left-turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, encroachment permit and requirements. Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. 2. Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Garvey Avenue: Implement SB/WB right-turn overlap phasing.An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Intersection improvements may be subject to ROW availability,environmental impacts,and further studies in the design development,if found feasible,add additional SB left-turn lane. 3. Intersection at Gabriel Boulevard and Graves Avenue: Implement EB/WB protected/permitted left-turn phasing.An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards,which will be determined during design development. 4. Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Rush Street: Implement NB/SB left-turn protected phasing and EB/WB protected/permitted left-turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards,which will be determined during design development. 5. Intersection at Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive: Implement protected/permitted left-turn phasing in all directions.An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards,which will be determined during design development. 6. Intersection at Rosemead Boulevard and Lower Azusa Road: Upgrade NB/SB protected left-turn phasing with new poles and left turn signals on mast arms to current standards.Currently LT poles are on medians and are not to current standards. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Rosemead Boulevard is under ..... , .,„ _ „,.r,^• TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECH '- Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.6 Caltrans jurisdiction. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, encroachment permit and requirements.Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. 7. Intersection at Rosemead Boulevard and Valley Boulevard: Implement NB/SB right-turn overlap phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards,which will be determined during design development. Rosemead Boulevard is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, encroachment permit and requirements. Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. 8. Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Muscatel Avenue: Implement EB/WB protected left-turn phasing.An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards,which will be determined during design development. 9. Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Ivar Avenue: Implement EB/WB protected left-turn phasing.An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 10.Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Mission Drive: Implement EB/WB protected/permitted left-turn phasing.An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards,which will be determined during design development. The design and implementation of traffic elements and actual locations will be determined during the design phase,which will include the following improvements: • Replace traffic signal controllers to 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers,and cabinets as required (IBD during Design). • Install fiber optic interconnect along major arterials (new conduits&cables)to improve traffic operations(subject to the design phase). • Install Ethernet switches and fiber optic communications equipment at existing controller cabinets. • Install communication hubs. • Install vehicle detection(e.g. loop,video)systems(IBD during Design). • Design and implement CCTV camera system(IBD during Design). • Update traffic signal timing and traffic signal synchronization to provide optimization of traffic flow for the AM and PM peak hours. • Design and implement a new central traffic signal management system (software and communication equipment)to monitor and control all of the signalized intersections within the City. At the completion of the design phase, the City shall inform the Metro Project Manager of the number of controllers and equipment needed to upgrade the traffic signal system, and the type of traffic control system they will deploy. In addition, the City shall coordinate the system design through Metro staff and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to coordinate with other Metro-funded traffic signal control projects in the immediate and surrounding areas and allow communication with the County of Los Angeles Information Exchange Network(!EN). An important element of this project is coordination with Los Angeles County. As indicated in ATTACHMENT G-2, SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS of the Agreement with METRO and the City the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW)will be an active participant in this project with coordination of the City's overall traffic signal management system development and integration to the Countywide information exchange network (IEN). Coordination with the LACDPW will maximize the regional arterials corridor traffic operational performance and minimize any potential conflicts. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSrECk Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.7 SCOPE OF WORK, 710 NORTH MIP FUNDING AGREEMENT HIGHLIGHTS, APPROACH Implementation process for each of the four projects requires several complex and lengthy phases. These phases include project development, fund management, design and preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), bidding,coordination award of construction contract,construction,construction management and inspection during construction, quality assurance/quality control, project accounting and project close out. Each phase requires complex and detail program&project management effort to assure project stays on schedule and within the budgets. Program & project management services are needed and will include all coordination required from initial project development phases through the end of construction. Program & project management services include the following anticipated tasks: • Coordination of projects and activities with involved agencies and stake holders, including the City of Rosemead, adjacent local agencies that may be impacted by the proposed improvements or may have received funding from L.A. Metro in the adjacent areas, L.A. Metro, County, Caltrans, and any other agencies and organizations that have jurisdictional control, regulatory agencies and stake holders as necessary. • Preparation of necessary request for proposals,agreements,assist in selection of various consultants.Services that will be provided by various consultants may include project design, environmental services, right-of-way acquisition and engineering services, geotechnical engineering services, traffic engineering services, surveying, and various other services to be determined as part of the project development as necessary. • Coordination to provide any and all tasks and services required to manage the project and program in an efficient and cost-effective manner. • Providing overall project and program management of the projects from initial project development through the end of construction and project closeout. The services will be provided on as-needed basis. It is anticipated that the work load for the requested services will depend on various factors, and the staffing need and work effort will vary. The City is in the process of finalizing funding agreements. METRO will inform the City the availability of final funds and the timing. The project schedules will be established based on final funding amounts and availability, as well as required process and durations for environmental reports, right-of-way takes, review and approvals by the City as well as jurisdictional and regulatory agencies. Following are highlights of the agreement between METRO and the City: • This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter's expenditures. LACMTA will withhold 5% of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. • GRANTEE must use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner. If GRANTEE intends to use a consultant or contractor to implement all or part of the Project, LACMTA requires that such activities be procured in accordance with GRANTEE's contracting procedures and consistent with State law as appropriate. GRANTEE will also use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner when the Funds are used to pay "in-house" staff time. This effective use of funds provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. • The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre-approved by LACMTA shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment the LACMTA pre-approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh j Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.8 • GRANTEE shall submit the draft of Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports within 60 days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November, February, May and August to the LACMTA Project Manager for review and pre-approval of the applicable report. • The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports shall include all appropriate documentation (such as contractor invoices,timesheets, receipts, etc.), and any changes to interim milestone dates that do not impact the final milestone date.All supporting documents must include a clear justification and explanation of their relevance to the Project. • If a request for reimbursement exceeds$500,000 in a single month,then GRANTEE can submit such an invoice once per month with supporting documentation. • LACMTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct audits of the Project as deemed appropriate, such as financial and compliance audits,interim audits,pre-award audits, performance audits and final audits. LACMTA will commence a final audit within six months of receipt of acceptable final invoice, provided the Project is ready for final audit. Following is the overall and general scope of work that will be involved in these projects,and will require various other consulting services, such as design, surveying, geotechnical, etc. Transtech will prepare RFP's for and assist the City in the evaluation proposals and selection of consultants. The construction work will be bid out per Public Contract Code and City requirements. DESIGN: I. Preliminary Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to,the following: A. Conduct field visits of the project area to identify design issues. Record existing site conditions in photographs and/or video. B. Conduct survey of the project area,establishing horizontal and vertical control for the project as necessary. C. Identify and coordinate with all utilities in the project area to facilitate the final design of the Project. D. Verify if a geotechnical survey will be necessary. If yes,conduct geotechnical investigations as necessary. E. Verify if right-of-way(R/W)acquisitions and/or vacations will be necessary.At this point all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. F. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and establish required environmental, review, approval and permitting process. G. Prepare construction cost estimate. II. Environmental Analysis It is anticipated this project will be either an exempt project or a Mitigated Negative Declaration(MND).Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to,the following: A. Prepare Initial Study(IS),consistent with CEQA Guidelines. B. If IS results in any impacts,prepare MND or any other applicable environmental document as necessary. C. Prepare the Draft IS and Draft MND for public circulation as necessary,respond to questions and comments,and finalize the environmental process. D. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W for required environmental review and approval. III. Final Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to,the following: A. Prepare plans for the required improvements, consistent with City and/or Caltrans format. B. Assist the City for any Community Information Workshop if necessary. C. Prepare construction specifications. D. Prepare an engineer's construction cost estimate based on the itemized quantity take-off from the contract documents. E. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and obtain required approval and permits. F. Complete Final Plans,Specifications and Estimates(PS&E) Bid Package. IV. Project Management ,; TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, i t S Project Management j s TRANSrECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.9 Grantee expects to provide overall project and program management,funding management through its in-house staff,and by using its in-house,already approved,engineering consultant. RIGHT-OF-WAY: Where necessary. CONSTRUCTION: The construction contract will be bid out per Public Contract Code and City requirements. The 710 North MIPs are funded by Measure R Funds, and the expenditures will be paid on a reimbursement basis by submitting Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. Cash flow and schedule is an important element of these projects. The agreements have an expenditure plan, based on which the projects will be funded. Below is a sample of developing the project Expenditure Plan for 1-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Westbound Ramp Improvements, and a combined cash flow plan with project task developed by Transtech demonstrating our understanding and approach t cash flow and schedule. ATTACHMENT B-1 -EXPENDITURE PLAN COST&CASH FLOW BUDGET Measure R Program-Funding Agreement Projects-FA#9200000000MR412O8 Project Title: 1-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway[Westbound]Ramp Improvements Project#: MR4.1.2.08 PROGRAMMED SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2020-21 FY 2020-21 FY 2020-21 FY 2020-21 IV 2021-22 FY 2021-22 IY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 TOTAL Sot RUES OF I' :NDS Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $2,500 $27,500 $35,000 $35,000 $50,000 $150,000 PS&E $7,500 $50,000 $142,500 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $650,000 RW Support $0 Const.Support $0 RW $0 Construction $0 Total MEASURER $0 $0 $10,000 $77,500 $177,600 $185,000 $200,000 $150,000 $800,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $0 $0 $10,000 $77,500 $177,500 $185,000 $200,000 $150,000 $800,000 PROJECT FUNDING _. $0 $0 $10,000 $77,500 $177,600 $185,000 $200,000 $160,000 $800,000 FY20-21 and FY21-22 IY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 TOTAL. SOIiRCES OF 11 iNDS Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr3 Qtr 4 BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $0 PS&E $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 RW Support $0 Const.Support $25,000 $25,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $650,000 RW $0 Construction $100,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $4.100,000 Total MEASURER $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $125,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $4,800,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $125,000 51,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $4,800,000 PROJECT FUNDING $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $125,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $4,800,000 FY22-23 and FY23-24 SOIiRCES OF FUNDS FY 2024-25 FY 2024-25 FY 21124-25 FY 2024-25 IY 2025-26 FY 2025-26 FY 2025-26 FY 2025-26 TOTAL. Qtrl Qtr Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr l Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr CUDGEL LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURER FUNDS: PAED $0 PS&E $0 RW Support $0 Const.Support $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 RW $0 Construction $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Total MEASURER $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $400,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $200,000 $200,000 $0 I $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $400,000 PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 FY24-25 and FY25-26 SUMMARY OFALL FUNPS _. .. ._ .. PAED SO $0 $2,500 $27,500 $35,000 $35,000 $50,000 $0 $150,000 PS&E $25,000 $25,000 $7,500 $50,000 $142,500 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $700,000 RW Support $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Const.Support $50,000 ' $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $750,000 RW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $150,000 $150,000 $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $4,400,000 TOTAL MILESTONES $226,000 $225,000 $36,000 $202,500 $1,327,500 $1,335,000 $1,350,000 $1,300,000 $6,000,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS $225,000 $225,000 $35,000 $202,500 $1,327,500 $1,335,000 $1,350,000 $1,300,000 $6,000,000 SUM NON-LACMTA FUNDS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $225,000 $225,000 $35,000 $202,500 $1,327,500 $1,335,000 $1,350,000 $1,300,000 56,000,000 tMitlininnint,'/[ ll TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects I i a t•. ` ndJ Ramp Ynprova,mnb. ProJecY:YR1.1208 FN 8800000000MRNIOB , NASTERWORKSHEET,MR1.1.2DB F108b.madBoubvartlFraarayryl.lbo =iminoommmonnouunonmomonoouu nnummmnnnnUUOOummmnnnunn ouommmonnuu000ummmnnouno ��0©1���m©�m0�©©�mm©��0 � �DDDDOmOm0�00m0���000�00 �DDD��DDDD�� �Om�O�©00 0 0'1-8 {pp,, 99 0 ©l��I:VIl©0©�®©© 00��©0M ©©�ET�®m�0®©�©OmRrJ''m©m©E �OmOa"I.0© ©0®©�OmOr�Ii m©�D IN s©RESULT onnoou000mmmonouuoouommm onnuuonuummmonnuu0000mmm onu000nuummmonuuuuooummm ORAND OFFERS 0©©©©ww ®'www®w(maarzNew 'www • TOTAL NCE S pp CALCLA SRouldbe (}3 'Effimmr=mmmiErmednimrarimmaccE111MIEE MEN§a0���® M�EE ©©MI® � M0 � TED •fD A ,e _ _ _ _ snaoo a0001 Cl) i NE= x i ' _ &1111=Earimi•cm.i: milwi..........."" "" $7502 Z • `5 imEREENEE.:alim 10tat.. , ,, w t,k,. u.au n w $IW,000 .000 ::8 f800Qa0o r* i. trciot µ... —= tt 0 _—- 1/00,000$0000008 S400000= 9 ! ! 0 ME=71MIEIMI: flm ®ofoU® DI3® oooummou©oo©nuoom fo omTonooonn !o C ©00voo©m©vo©U©D© o©oteuau©v © o ©m vo©©o momv©m ,, o F- oowaszumoo om0000mo 000m0000 O• 0 TASESS IMT COMP "1,111"'1„'1"1'1„ " 1' '1'11,1"'1111'1"1'1, 1"'111111'11"1'11,1,1' a• ' SOLI---B-ROPOSA. i-111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 11 DoMoPSdNa0nn Package _ 1-0 111111 1111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 3 o E�.1�sement m,®1111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ICIEIIIIIIII 11111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ®MIIIIIIIII 1111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ;_ Q ® X11111111111 1111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 1111111111 11111111111111 111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 Q j FuIM Execuh:d Contract SR1 j FLANNpAt _ ®®111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII `- ▪ C2dine� LAeoun7lao on ®6? 11111111111 N 111111/11 11111//1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111 3 ° ::::::::::1111111111111111111 ysh.n corryahbilitr and in0yrafion- i Ra�e.andDamcdie<ean ®1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • 3 d DF 11111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 1 I :ED—•.41 I a` ,m �dMND.finaD[e © .IIIIIII•IIHIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 ®®IIIIIIIII (IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII F ©IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII1111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 s 1 P< d-- ® 1 1111111111! . . 1!!.-1111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 i tao JURYDICODNALREYEW, ® �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII pROVA<S,ANDPERYR6 ©.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • LoodABerklea ,22 12111111111111111111111 111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .ana © 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII CONS,RUCTION ®i'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII P58E8id RacLpeAMar6samaM ,'n IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111 �`...s IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII CantedAvmd ©©111111111111111111111111 111111111' --,...1111111111111 111111111111111111111111 FuINE.auleaContracl ©®IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111`4x1111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111111 P hllp8OwanedvnfgSralen ® 111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 11111111111111111111 j :-nand Te- ��111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 1 11111111111111111111 \ system mD Dtaaon ane re:Dnp 0 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.11 General Approach: We have a structured approach to execute projects in an efficient manner that makes Transtech capable of providing the City with an efficient and quality product. Transtech has established guidelines and policies, including written manuals on quality control, project management, and design procedures for its staff and for its contract cities. These guidelines ensure a consistent approach to the execution of assignments undertaken by our organization in compliance with City's specific procedures,standards and requirements. The following paragraphs describe our general approach to deliver projects in an efficient and cost-effective manner. A project specific approach will be provided for each assigned project and will become part of the specific contract for the specific project. • Project Management: Our approach is to provide proactive management and attempt to identify potential issues and problems in advance and take corrective actions before they become problems. This requires extensive hands-on knowledge,experience and management skills of the people involved in managing the project. Our team members have extensive experience and proven track record in managing large and complex projects and bringing them to a completion on time and within budget. • Approach to Cost Control and Change Orders: We evaluate project costs and develop feasible mitigation measures to minimize additional costs. We work as a team to solve problems or make modifications in the field to address unforeseen conditions or owner generated changes in a cost-effective manner. • Approach to Scheduling and Timely Completion of Project and Schedule Recovery: The baseline schedule should properly identify the project scope, critical path, project milestones, target dates, phases and sequences of work, and activity durations. When significant activities show that they are slipping from the baseline, we work with the contractor to develop recovery plans. • Management of Documents: We use an electronic file management system. All construction forms,daily dairies,weekly statement of working days,etc.are stored in our electronic file system,and are per Caltrans documentation system. We provide these documents at the end of the project to the client in organized files as well as pdf files. • Safety and Security:We hold meetings with the contractor to review and discuss safety and security requirements,OSHA conformance, emergency security and safety procedures,and enforce security and safety responsibilities. • Funding Closeout: We prepare necessary closeout documentation required by the funding agencies, submit final reimbursement documentation,follow-up on the reimbursements,and final funds balance report. • Project Closeout: We recognize that closeout is an important part of the construction process. It signifies that the new facility structure is ready to use. We methodically handle all closeout tasks to ensure a smooth transition from construction to occupancy. • Methodology for Communication to Inform City on Work Progress: Key project team members will attend periodic project progress meetings with City staff throughout the project duration. • Electronic common project information and file sharing platform:We create and provide access to project participates a common project information and file sharing platform. Coordination with City: Key project team members will attend periodic project progress meetings with City staff throughout the project duration.We will maintain and establish and maintain a close working relationship with City staff. We will manage assigned projects, carefully control costs and resources, and complete assigned work on schedule. We will provide progress reports to the City at regular intervals. Contract Administration Approach: For construction contract administration,we follow guidelines described in Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual(LAPM). Maintaining complete and accurate files is a very important aspect of managing federally funded projects. Generally,whenever the local agency is unable to produce requested data or information, it is assumed by reviewing personnel that the required actions were either never performed or not properly recorded.Organized project files can minimize these negative assumptions. Organization and content of the project file is one indicator of effective and efficient management of the project by the resident engineer. Community Information Approach: We also provide effective public outreach, including setting up an information web site,toll free project call number, project e- mail,hold community information meetings,provide public information via e-mails on web sites. _2) MINIM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECII Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.12 Community Involvement: Supporting civic and community activities demonstrates Transtech's commitment to the progress, health, and well-being of the communities we serve. This is something that we take pride in as a company. In services and partnership with our client Cities, we have a proven record of active engagement in City and Community events. This includes involvement or presence at City programs or events, supporting local businesses through the chamber, youth events, hosting workshops, sports, scholarship opportunities, community service, managing homelessness challenges, public safety, crime prevention, or any other community benefit that the City wishes us to be a part of.Our goal is not just to serve as an engineering consultant(which is what we are best at)but to also be an active partner with our clients and further enhance the City's reputation as an ideal community to live,invest, work, and play in. We are deeply committed to maintaining our partnership with our valued customers, its community, and remain open and enthusiastic to receiving input on how to best serve the City's needs today and in the future to further enhance the City's reputation as an ideal community to live,invest,work,and play in. Below are some recent CBE programs we have started,facilitated and/or were part of. TEMPLE CITY YOUTH COMMITTEE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY EMBRACING LATINA LEADERSHIP a' .� BOOTH The Transtech Team M'/ ALLIANCES (ELIAS) Transtech r_� volunteered their time at no cost to f`` " annually hosts engineering f! o; 4.- the City by preparing traffic safety r workshops at the ELLAS Annual I , i. brochures and working together with P "r' Empowerment Conference. The : the youth committee to educate the .. workshop is aimed to encourage imi, community about road safety for .�� I students to pursue an academic * motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. career in a STEM field. Our team This particular event was held to shares their personal experiences coincide with another City event to capture many community in college as Civil Engineering majors as well as their members. Transtech joined the Temple City Youth Committee transition into their careers. The workshop is designed to in hosting the booth that focused on pedestrian safety and empower young women in the community to advocate for included surveys for the community to fill out related to the themselves and others while making positive life choices. types of traffic improvements they would like to see around the Transtech is a big supporter of the Embracing Latina City,their frequency of using different modes of transportation Leadership Alliances (ELLAS) organization and has worked (walking,cycling,driving),and other traffic related questions. in partnership with this nonprofit for almost a decade through volunteering and mentoring. GIRLS LEADERSHIP AND MENTORING (GLAM)WORKSHOP AT HIGH SCHOOL ENLISTEE RECOGNITION CEREMONY +, BELL'S MAGNOLIA SCIENCE ACADEMY THROUGH "OUR COMMUNITY lir _ The Transtech Team volunteered their - ,r, SALUTES"Transtech was honored , . Saturday to be part of an incredibly • to be part of the High School _ i ` impactful and inspiring panel of women r'''y : ' ",:,4,,*( Enlistee Recognition Dinner at the 6th Annual GLAM Workshop. +4., .'—: 1�,U Ceremony through the nonprofit 3?' ,'• 1.II-,.,i',' Hosted by Magnolia Science Academy in organization "Our Community imiiiiiiiiiiii the City of Bell, the workshop included Salutes". The Ceremony took young women between the ages of 10 ��'� place in Pico Rivera. It recognized and 17. The purpose of the workshop is to empower young and honored high school enlistees and their commitment women to advocate for themselves and others while making to military service as well as provided parents and positive life choices so they can become the leaders we all know guardians of enlistees with community support as their they can be! sons and daughters transition into military service. Transtech's Virtual Communication Approach due to COVID-19 Impacts: At Transtech,the safety and well-being of Transtech Team Members and our client Cities is always our priority,and we recognize the important role we play in providing services to our client Cities during this critical time. Internally,we have issued notices to all our Transtech Team Members working inside City Halls,field project sites,and across our Transtech Offices emphasizing social distancing, following CDC preventative guidelines, and staying home if feeling sick. Protective gear, including masks and gloves 117....4). ,,,, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRans chi Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.13 1111111111111 have been made available to all Transtech Team Members. Furthermore, relevant CDC guidelines and recommended posters have been posted throughout our offices. Additionally,we have created a designated email, health@transtech.org;in which any email sent to this address will be distributed to our management team.This in effect is our own activated Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to effectively deal with the ongoing developments as they may arise — please feel free to email us with any information, 24-7. In addition to the above items, below are highlights of our response to our current client Cities and how we are adapting and customizing our services as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic. 1. Transtech has long implemented all necessary and vital electronic tools, software and remote workflows to provide its services. Having such tools and software deployed,Transtech has been able to provide essential services with no service disruption to its client Cities during COVID-19. 2. All Transtech personnel have work laptops and smartphones.Transtech's virtual workstations and cloud servers allow all Transtech personnel to work remotely virtually anywhere. 3. Transtech utilizes Microsoft Teams virtual video/audio meeting system and conducts client meetings virtually with all stakeholders. 4. Transtech retains all work files electronically on its Cloud servers, providing real-time access to all project stakeholders. Ease of access to information provided by Transtech minimizes face to face meetings during COVID-19. 5. Transtech utilizes electronic/online bid management systems by providing electronic bid/proposal submittal options, which eliminates or minimizes City walk-ins.Transtech has helped some of our client Cities transition to fully electronic bid/proposal submittals during City Hall closures. 6. Transtech has implemented an electronic/online permit issuance portal at no additional cost to its various client City's Building&Safety and Public Works Departments. 7. Transtech has been instrumental in adopting electronic plan check workflows by using its own electronic plan check system to its various client City's Building&Safety and Public Works Departments at no additional cost.The Transtech team has prepared and successfully implemented custom plan check portals for their client Cities and has delivered electronic plan checks throughout City Hall closures during COVID-1 9. 8. During electronic permit and plan check system implementations to its client Cities,Transtech staff worked closely with City Finance and IT Departments to implement electronic/online payment workflows and provided training to City Staff to eliminate any service disruption. 9. The above tools and services have been implemented at no additional cost to our client Cities.This service will also be extended to new cities at no additional cost. 10. Virtual Inspections have been implemented on a case by case basis for occupied buildings and home inspections by our Building and Safety Department. 11. Building inspections continue for non-occupied structures. 12. We have set up designated toll-free numbers with assigned operators and email distribution lists for continuity of virtual government services. DISCUSSION REGARDING RELINQUISHMENT OF ROSEMEAD BLVD, WHICH IS UNDER CALTRANS JURISDICTION Municipalities sometimes seek relinquishment of all or portions of state highways running through their jurisdictions to gain local control over the land uses on or adjacent to these roadways and to reduce the cost and delay associated with gaining Caltrans' approval, and being subject to its decisions,whenever changes are sought. Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual,ARTICLE 3 Policies indicate Highways or local roads under Caltrans' jurisdiction that do not serve regional or statewide transportation needs should be relinquished to the appropriate local agency. There are several benefits to relinquishing facilities that are no longer required to serve regional and statewide needs: • An increase in local agencies' responsiveness to community interest in the administration, planning,construction, and operation of facilities, resulting in a cost savings to taxpayers by eliminating the need for State encroachment permits TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020.11, Project Management Services TRANSTECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility improvements Projects 1. Approach and Scope of Work 1.14 • A reduction of on-going maintenance costs for the State • A reduction in tort liability for the State • A decrease in State incident response efforts • Decreased competition for capital funds for regional and statewide improvements Caltrans is responsible for relinquishing roads well maintained and in operable condition. Major widening or other improvements (except safety improvements) should not be considered if the improvement would cause betterment of the facility beyond the state of good repair. In these cases, the city or county may elect to pay the portion of the cost to upgrade the facility geometrically or structurally over and above that which is justified. When relinquishing a State highway, there may be occasions when it is appropriate for Caltrans to perform construction work or to provide financial contributions to the local agency to ensure that the facility is well maintained and in operable condition. Construction work or financial contributions may be considered if they are in the best interest of the State. • Adjacent segments of Rosemead Boulevard have been relinquished to local jurisdictions. • Rosemead Boulevard through the City of Rosemead maybe a potential candidate for relinquishment. 111111111121111111111111111 47 .ii TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSIECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects co 1.14N ■ iO■ CD PF mi CD 3 2 ni fg COI O 3 w V 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.1 a PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART Vie` CITY OF ROSEMEAD � � RÔJMD LEAD PROJECT AGENCY itAmirii.i TRANSTECH TEAM PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART Coordination Public Ahmad Ansari,PE with the Contract Principal Community following Over 30 years of experience.Served as Public Information, agencies that Director and City Engineer for several Cities. Noticing,& will be involved TRANSTECI-I Extensive experience in Public Works Project Outreach in funding, Administration. Est 1989 review process, permits,& Ali F.Zaghari,PE,PMP Avant-Garde:Lissette MontoyalMegan LeNoue Consultant 1 approvals. Management Support for Coordination with Caltrans, Technical Support for Measure R Funds Consultant 2 Caltrans Encroachment Permit Processing and Coordination and Compliance,Quarterly Reports Consultant 3 METRO 20f7 years of experience. Work closely with Consultant 4 Metro 35 years of experience working at Caltrans, METRO.As a sub to Transtech,prepared FTIP District 7 in Los Angeles. Former Deputy District Sheets for approval of 710 North MIP funding for Director for Traffic Operations. various Cities. Contractor 1 Contractor 2 Rahman Janka,PE Melissa Demirci,RSP/Karen Vigil,EIT Contractor 3 Technical Support for Coordination with Caltrans, Public Relations,Funding,Management Support Contractor 4 County,Metro's TAC and Arterial ITS Committee 10 years of experience,assists in public Pad '1/1.4a4 35 years of experience as City Traffic Engineer. meetings and presentations,contract Served 10 years as Chair of Metro's StreetslFwys administration.Experience in administration of Subcommittee advising Metro TAC and Board on projects in compliance with Caltrans Local Coordination various Transportation and ITS issues. Assistance Procedures(LAPM). with adjacent Cities near Mike Benyamin,PE David Ragland,PE,PLS,QSD,QSP project Technical Support for Work requiring Caltrans Engineering,QC/QA Support improvement Review,Processing and Permit Approvals Over 35 years of experience.Managed numerous areas. 30 years of experience in Project Development multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the and Management and Local Assistance planning,engineering,entitlement,permitting, Engineering at Caltrans,District 7 in Los development and construction of urban and rural Angeles. development,and public works projects. Coordination with other regulatory Michael Ackerman,PE,QSD,QSP,QISP Craig Melicher,PE agencies, Engineering Review Support Project Management,QC/QA Support entities,&utility Over 20 years of experience.Served as City Over 30 years of experience.Served in various Engineer. Extensive experience in Public Works capacities,such as City Engineer and CIP companies. Project Administration.Experience also includes Manager for various Cities.Extensive experience working for Caltrans. in contract administration for public agencies. Ali Cayir,PE Okan Demirci,PE,QSD,QSP Program and Project Management Support Program and Project Management Support 35 years of experience in City Engineering and 10 years of experience.Serves as CIP Program Project Management Manager at Transtech's Contract Cities and Coordinated Approval of 710 North MIP funding provides technical and management support. for over$300 m for various Cities. Assisted in Approval of 710 North MIP funding for over$300 m for various Cities. Established in 1989,Transtech(a California Corporation)is a multi-disciplinary engineering consulting firm. Transtech is currently providing municipal services to approximately 50 agencies,and has extensive experience working in a mixed stafflconsultant environment for over 30 years. Our team includes experienced staff members who have worked for and/or with LACMTA(METRO),CALTRANS and LOS ANGELES COUNTY,and are intimately familiar with the standards and procedures,project development and approval process, staff and funding requirements of these agencies. v o:u,:.. F� '�.:. ,.er „�. ,,, ,..-+a. .qac;:. _,•a. �� w TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSJ-Fch Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY STAFF Our team includes experienced staff members who have worked for and/or with LACMTA (METRO), CALTRANS and LOS ANGELES COUNTY, and are intimately familiar with the standards and procedures, project development and approval process, staff and funding requirements of these agencies. • Ali F. Zaghari, PE, PMP, Support for Coordination with Caltrans, Caltrans Encroachment Permit Processing and METRO. Mr. Zaghari has over 35 years of experience in Transportation Management &Operations in various capacities at Caltrans. His career path includes a number of key managerial positions in Caltrans leading to his last position as the Deputy District Director for Traffic Operations at Caltrans District 7 in Los Angeles. Mr. Zaghari was the lead Caltrans representative on the 1-210 Connected Corridors (Integrated Corridor Management) study involving Caltrans, County of Los Angeles, and the four cities of Pasadena, Arcadia, Monrovia and Duarte providing direction for the system management and ITS architecture for this first pilot project in San Gabriel Valley. • Bahman Janka, PE, Support for Coordination with Caltrans, County, Metro's TAC and Metro's Arterial ITS Committee. Mr.Janka has over 35 years of experience in Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning. He has served in City Traffic Engineer and Transportation Administrator positions for the Cities of Santa Clarita and Pasadena and, and has coordinated with Los Angeles County and San Gabriel Valley cities on regional Traffic Signal/ITS systems. He was instrumental in consultant and system provider selection for the Adaptive Traffic Signal System in Pasadena, which is a very similar component to the task in the Rosemead Mobility Improvements Project. He served for ten years as the Chair of Metro's Streets and Freeways Subcommittee advising Metro TAC and Metro Board on various Transportation and ITS issues. He is also a member of Metro's Arterial ITS Committee providing input on ITS needs and functionality of the systems in the Metro region. He served for 7 years on the 1-210 Connected Corridors (Integrated Corridor Management) Project involving Caltrans, Los Angeles County, and the four cities of Pasadena, Arcadia, Monrovia and Duarte on system management and organization of this first pilot project in San Gabriel Valley. He has extensive experience working in collaboration with Los Angeles County Metro ITS Committee and has worked closely with Caltrans and LA County Technical Staff, who will be involved in the 710 MIP Projects at various levels, including review and approval and integration of the selected ITS TS into County-wide system. • Mike Benyamin, PE,Support for Coordination with Caltrans, Caltrans Encroachment Permit Processing and METRO. Mr. Benjamin has over 30 years of experience in Project Development and Management and Local Assistance Engineering at Caltrans, including as Caltrans Local Assistance Engineer managing programs and projects for local agencies, Project Initiation Documents (PID), Project Approval and Environmental Documents (PA&ED), Plan Specification and Estimates (PS&E), and Construction of the Projects. We have extensive experience in the local area and project requirements and processes, as well as working as an extension of City staff, providing services in similar capacities with minimal direction from City staff. One of the unique qualifications of Transtech and its staff is that we work as Contract City Engineers, Traffic Engineers and Project Managers for several agencies. We have extensive experience working with Public Agencies in similar assignments, including experience in dealing with Public Agency Staff, Council, and Commissions. We are accustomed to working with governmental agencies, and have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures, and policies. We are accustomed to working with local and regional agencies, and have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures, and policies. Our Sr. Level Project Staff includes: • Ahmad Ansari, PE, Contract Principal. Mr. Ansari, a Principal at Transtech, provides any contractual or technical support and QC/QA if and when needed. Mr.Ansari has over 30 years of past experience in City and County Public Works and has worked at several municipalities in Southern California at executive ,., TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTEch Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.3 management level, City of Moreno Valley- Public Works Director/City Engineer, City of Rialto- Public Works Director/City Engineer, City of Perris-Public Works Director,City of Pomona- Deputy Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer. • Ali Cayir, PE, Program and Project Management Support. Mr. Cayir has over 35 years of experience in engineering. He has participated on numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the planning and development of civil and traffic engineering, urban and rural development,and public works projects. He served as Principal Project Manager for the design,construction and management of a variety of projects. Mr. Cayir served as contract City Engineer, Traffic Engineer and Interim Public Works Director for many municipalities in Southern California. He has a broad knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public,various city departments, city council and other governmental agencies. Our staff includes experienced engineers, contract administration, public relations staff members, who have managed numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the planning, engineering, entitlement, environmental permitting, development and construction of numerous similar public works projects, including projects funded through METRO Funds. • David Ragland,PE,PLS, QSD, QSP,Engineering,QC/QA Support. Mr. Ragland is a civil engineer and land surveyor has over 30 years of diverse experience in a wide variety of projects in civil engineering. He has managed numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the planning, engineering, entitlement, environmental permitting, development and construction of urban and rural development, and public works projects. • Michael Ackerman, PE, QSD, QSP, QISP, Engineering Review Support. Mr. Ackerman has over 20 years of experience. At Transtech, he has been working as a Sr. Engineer at various Transtech City Engineering Contracts. He has served at various Cities under Transtech's City Engineering Contracts, including Temple City, Huntington Park, and Alhambra. Mr. Ackerman managed Engineering and CIP, attended and coordinated with COG Regional Transportation Planning, GWMA Gateway Water Management Association, and Los Angeles Upper Reach 2 Storm Water Management Group. He is very familiar with the local and regional agencies and goals. He has a broad knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public,various city departments, city council and other governmental agencies. • Craig Melicher, PE, Project Management, QC/QA Support. Mr. Melicher has approximately 35 years of experience. Mr. Melicher has served in various capacities, such as City Engineer, and CIP Manager for various Cities. Mr. Melicher also served as Principal Program Manager for a wide variety of projects. Depending on the specific project, Mr. Melicher's services included everything from initial concept to project close-out. He has a broad knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public, various city departments, city council and other governmental agencies. • Melissa Demirci, RSP, Public Relations, Funding, Management Support. Ms. Demirci has 10 years of experience in Traffic&Transportation Analyst,Project Manager,Associate Engineer,Transportation Grant Writer. She has worked in the Public Works Department and assists in the preparation of staff reports, contract administration, RFP preparation, CIP Budget preparation, bid analysis, budgeting. She is well versed in Caltrans and Local Assistance construction filing and document system. She has prepared several transportation related grant applications and helped facilitate over $20 million in funding for clients' public works and transportation improvement projects. mom TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSIECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.4 We have extensive experience with LACMTA (METRO) 710 North MIPs, and Measure R Funding Program and Requirements. Cash flow management,timely reporting and reimbursement submittals, accurate and proper documentation of eligible expenses are critical to maintain a steady cash flow and minimizing City's cash outlay, as well as avoiding any audit issues at the end of these projects. The 710 North MIPs are funded by Measure R Funds,and the expenditures will be paid on a reimbursement basis by submitting Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report, with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required. METRO will withhold 5% of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. We work closely with METRO and manage several local projects for Local Cities where we serve as City Engineers and Project Managers. Our Team also assisted several local agencies in preparing project funding documents for over $300 million of funding for the SR 710 North MIPs, for which we had also prepared funding applications and assisted our client cities in obtaining these funds for local projects. Our team also includes Avant-Garde, Inc., a well-known expert grant coordination consultant, with extensive experience in working with METRO and managing Grant Programs for many local agencies. Avant-Garde has been one of Transtech's exclusive Funding Support Consultant. They provide administrative responsibilities such as assistance with the preparation and monitoring of the operating budget and Capital Improvement Program budget, and work with METRO and various other funding agencies in completing appropriate form and reports to ensure that the clients are in compliance with grant requirements and reimbursement are received in a timely manner. • Lissette Montoya,Measure R Fund Quarterly Reports,Reimbursement,FTIP Program Updates Support. Ms. Montoya has approximately 20 years of experience, and works closely with METRO and other Funding Agencies. She provides funding administration to ensure that cities develop their projects in accordance with policy and procedural requirements, assists in determining eligible projects, and manages various Cities' funding programs with METRO. Ms. Montoya is proficient in managing and preparing funding reimbursement requests and reporting through various agencies (FHWA, Metro, Caltrans, HUD) for various multi-million- dollar projects. This includes programing projects in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program, processing of fund exchanges and preparing funding packages to Metro (Call for Projects, Local Return, Discretional Funding),the California Transportation Commission, Caltrans and FHWA. Ms. Montoya also has experience in public relations coordination, community outreach efforts and community relations, focus group moderation in English and Spanish, business development and event planning. • Megan LeNoue, Measure R Fund Quarterly Reports, Reimbursement, FTIP Program Updates Support. Ms. LeNoue has approximately 7 years of experience. in administrative and municipal program services and contract administration. Her overall experience includes grant research and writing, funding administration, project management and analysis, community outreach support, labor compliance monitoring, and construction management assistance. Ms. LeNoue has worked in conjunction with the project managers of the company and served as a liaison to provide support on various projects. One of her main responsibilities is assisting clients with preparing and administering programs as required by federal and state funding agencies to ensure projects are developed in accordance with policy and procedural guidelines. Ms. LeNoue is proficient in preparing funding reimbursement requests and quarterly reporting through various agencies (FHWA, Metro, Caltrans, CaIOES)for various multi-million-dollar projects. A/ MUM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, ProJact Managamant Sorvlcas TRANSTECIh Rolatod to SR-T10 North Corridor Mobility Improvomonts Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.5 Ms. Montoya and Ms. LeNoue, as a sub to Transtech, prepared FTIP Sheets for approval of several 710 North MIP Projects for various Cities. RESUMES Following are resumes of Staff Members shown on the Project Organization Chart. -���� TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11,Project Management Services TR ch Related to SR-T10 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.6 AHMAD ANSARI,PE,Contract Principal Mr.Ansari, a Principal at Transtech, provides any contractual or technical support and QC/QA if and when needed. Mr.Ansari has over 30 years of past experience in City and County Public Works and has worked at several municipalities in Southern California at executive management level: • City of Moreno Valley-Public Works Director/City Engineer • City of Rialto-Public Works Director/City Engineer ; , • City of Perris-Public Works Director • City of Pomona-Deputy Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer He has managed full-time staffing levels of up to 123, and served as the responsible in charge of numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the business of public works including: • Capital Improvement Program project management and delivery • Real Property/Right of Way acquisition and management EDUCATION • Traffic and Transportation engineering • BS Civil Engineering& • Private Development/Entitlement process review and approval Architecture, USC • Maintenance and Operations including roads,storm drains,sewers,parks,facilities, • Resident Engineer Academy, traffic signals,signs/striping,fleet Caltrans • Real Estate • Special Districts, Landscape/Lighting Assessment • Electric Utility REGISTRATION • Participation in Economic Development/Job Creation incentives through effective • Registered Civil Engineer infrastructure improvements • Licensed Real Estate Broker Most recently,he served as Interim City Manager at City of Rialto.Prior,he managed the HIGHLIGHTS Orange County Public Works'7-year Capital Improvement Program comprised of roads, • 33 years of past experience flood and bikeway improvement projects throughout the County. in City and County Public Works He has a broad knowledge of local government operations, including preparation and • City of Rialto—Interim City presentation of agenda reports to advisory boards,commissions and city councils. He is Manager well versed in public outreach and interaction with citizenry groups, committees and • County of Orange Public stakeholders. Mr. Ansari has excellent working relationship and rapport with regional Works Administrative and sub-regional governmental/regulatory agencies. He has represented cities/county Manager at League of California Cities,CSAC/CEAC organizations, and APWA. • City of Moreno Valley- Public Works Director/City Public Works and City/County Engineering past positions held Engineer • County of Orange-Administrative Manager II • City of Rialto-Public Works • City of Moreno Valley-Public Works Director/City Engineer Director/City Engineer • City of Rialto-Public Works Director/City Engineer • City of Perris-Public Works • City of Perris-Public Works Director Director • City of Pomona-Deputy Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer • City of Pomona-Deputy • City of Burbank-Senior Civil Engineer Public Works Director/Assistant City Multi-Million-Dollar/Complex Infrastructure Projects Managed Engineer County of Orange-Public Works, Roads- • City of Burbank-Senior Civil • Crawford Canyon Rd(Construction Phase) Engineer • Edinger Bridge Replacement(Construction Phase) • Hazard Ave Bikeway(Planning/Public Outreach Phase) • Oso Pkwy/Antonio Intersection (Planning/Design Phase) • Oso Pkwy/SR-241 Toll Rd Bridge(CM Augmentation/Bidding) • Brea Cyn Rd Widening(Planning/Funding) .: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSrECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.7 • Live Oak/Trabuco Rd Safety Improvements(Design/Bidding) • Santiago Cyn Rd Safety Improvements(Planning/Public Outreach) County of Orange-Public Works, Flood- • Lane Channel Improvements(Design/Bidding) • Fullerton Creek Ph. 1(Construction) • San Juan Creek Ph.4,5,6(Construction) City of Moreno Valley-Public Works • Nason/SR-60 freeway Interchange • Moreno Beach/SR-60 freeway Interchange • Theodore/60 freeway Interchange • Heacock Channel • Morrison Park Fire Station • City's Corporate Yard Administration Building • Reche Vista Realignment • Nason Extension/Cactus Widening • Traffic Management Center City of Rialto-Public Works • Riverside/I-10 freeway Interchange • Pepper Ave Extension and Pepper/I-210 freeway Interchange • Rialto City Park • Veterans memorial Park • Jerry Eaves Park • Riverside Ave Fire Station • Renewable Energy/Power Generation at Wastewater Treatment Plant • Foothill Blvd Improvements • Iconic Bus Shelters Citywide City of Perris-Public Works • Perris Blvd Resurfacing • Ramona Expwy Raised Medians, Landscaping and Resurfacing • City Council Chamber Renovation City of Pomona-Public Works • Mission Blvd Resurfacing and Parkway Landscaping • Mission/SR-71 Grade Separation • Variety of Water Bond Utility Improvements City of Burbank-Public Works • Five-Points(Burbank/Victory Blvd's) Intersection Realignment • Former Lockheed Building 85 Acquisition, Hazardous Waste Abatement and Demolition • Glenoaks Blvd Resurfacing • Magnolia Blvd Streetscape/Street Furniture Improvements TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020.11, Protect Management Sorvlcs TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.8 ALI F.ZAGHARI,PE,PMP,Management Support for Coordination with Caltrans,Caltrans Encroachment Permit Processing and METRO Mr.Zaghari has over 35 years of experience in Transportation Management&Operations at various capacities in the California Department of Transportation(Caltrans). His career path includes a number of key managerial positions in Caltrans leading to his last position as the Deputy District Director(DDD) for Traffic Operations at Caltrans District 7 in Los litt . .i Angeles. �! Administrative and Management Responsibility As a member of District 7 Executive Team, Mr. Zaghari was responsible for policy, development and implementation of the traffic operations assets and the safe mobility of all users of the State Highway System (SHS) consisting of approximately 1500 center miles of freeways and conventional highways in Los Angeles and Ventura counties. He managed an operating budget of approximately $70M encompassing both operations �f‘114i `` management and capital outlaysupport needs. The organization under his leadership 3 < g P pP g included critical functions such as Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS),Traffic Design, EDUCATION District Traffic Manager (DTM), Corridor Management, System Performance, and • MS Civil Engineering Encroachment Permits. • BS Civil Engineering Experience REGISTRATION (2013-2019) During his tenure as DDD, Traffic Operations, Mr. Zaghari oversaw the • Registered Civil Engineer transportation management and operations and safety of the State Highway System in • Professional Project District 7. In addition to the Safety Program implementation that delivered continuous Management(PMP) monitoring, measurement, evaluation, and enhancements of the safety aspects of the SHS, other administrative and management responsibilities included operating, HIGHLIGHTS managing, and improving the District ITS elements such as the Traffic Signal Network, • Over 35 years of past the central systems such as Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS), Ramp experience in Caltrans Metering System (RMS) and other related field elements: CCTV, CMS and detection including: systems necessary to perform monitoring, verification, detection of incidents and • Deputy District 7 Director, response functions. Traffic Operations, • Chief,Office of Traffic Design The capital outlay project development overseen by Mr.Zaghari included project concept (D7) development, project initiation (PIDs), project approval (PAED), and delivery of PS&E. • Director,Showcase Program These activities were performed both as lead and support relevant to the District's • Senior Transportation Capital Outlay Program's delivery targets. Traffic Operations Division's share of the Engineer, New Technology& targets ranged from$250M to$0.5B annually.The projects types covered a vast variety Research of needs such as development and/or upgrade of Traffic Control and safety devices,and • Senior Transportation ITS. Engineer,Traffic Operations Area Management As part of Caltrans' transformation to a system management culture, Mr. Zaghari • Associate Transportation oversaw a number of innovative transportation projects such as Reorganizing for TSMO, Engineer, Encroachment a Transportation Systems Management and Operations based reorganization launched Permits in July 2017, first of its kind in the state and arguably nationwide, and the Connected Corridors Pilot Project on Interstate 210 which is a statewide Integrated Corridor Management initiative. Other past innovative projects include the Strategic Growth Plan's Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System (ATCS) for better signal optimization and synchronization, which received the 2009 Excellence in Transportation (EIT)Award, and the Dynamic Lane Management Project at the Interstate 110/5 interchange for better operational efficiency through advanced technology, which received the 2011 Tranny Award. TM. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSIEC{! 1 r Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.9 (2003-2013)As Chief,Office of Traffic Design, Mr.Zaghari oversaw project development and delivery of capital outlay support projects reports and Plans Specifications and Estimates focused on traffic control and safety devices improvements. (1999-2003) As Chief, Office of Truck Services Manager, assisted in development, and implementation of policies and procedures tied to operations and safety of the extralegal loads transport on the SHS. (1993-1999) As the Showcase Project manager and later as the Program Director, Mr. Zaghari directed, and managed the pioneer Showcase Program and a multitude of regional ITS projects across Southern California. Showcase was a multi-jurisdictional program aimed at multi-modal integration and interoperability of various transportation systems management and traveler information. (1990-1993) Served as a Senior Transportation Engineer in the Office of Freeway Operations responsible for State freeway traffic operations in the San Gabriel Valley area. (1988-1990) Served as an Associate Transportation Engineer responsible for hydrology and drainage system related Encroachment Permits. (1986-1988) Served as the Assistant Transportation Engineer and a member of the Encroachment Permits writers in the District. (1984-1986)Completed the Caltrans comprehensive Rotation Training Program through various divisions such as Design,Construction,and Traffic Operations. Professional Organizations/Committees Member of the State Traffic Operations Board. Member of the Transportation Research Board, Freeway Operations Committee. Member of LA County Traffic Executive Committee. Represented Caltrans at the SCAG Transportation Committee and Subcommittee on Managed Lanes. Member of the Statewide Steering Committee overseeing Caltrans effort to revise its Traffic Impact Study and Transportation Analysis Guidelines due to SB743 shifting measurement of transportation efficiency from use of Level of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT). One of 4 sponsors to the Statewide Committee to develop Transportation Systems Management and Operations(TSMO)guidelines. Presentations and Awards • Presented on various topics at LA County Traffic Executive Committee presided by Supervisors Antonovich and Barger. • Represented Caltrans and made presentations at the LA Metro Board. • Presented multiple topics at the SCAG Transportation Committee. • Speaker at the Southern California ITS Conferences. • Speaker at the TRB, Freeway Operations Committee. • Coordinated one of two Southern California Agencies Forums on Driverless Cars. • Some of the Awards include: Showcase Program Completion (1999) Statewide Traffic Operations System Management(2018) National Operations Center of Excellence TSMO Champion of the Year(2019) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020.11, Protect Management Services TRANSTECk Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.10 BAHMAN JANKA, PE, Sr. Traffic Engineer, Technical Support for Coordination with Caltrans, County, Metro's TAC and Arterial ITS Committee Mr. Janka has over 35 years of experience in Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning. He has served as City Traffic Engineer and Transportation Director for public agencies. Administrative and Management Responsibility Administration and management activities of the Administration Division of the Department of Transportation with a total operating budget of$40.4 million including a $6.5 million General Fund and a staff of 50 people in four functional areas of Transportation Planning & Development/Complete Streets, Traffic Engineering/Operations,Transit Planning/Operations,and Parking Planning/Operations. • Experience City of Pasadena,California:Transportation Administrator EDUCATION City of Santa Clarita,California:City Traffic Engineer • MS Civil Engineering(Traffic City of Fremont,California:Associate Transportation Engineer Engineering and City of Palo Alto,California:Associate Transportation Engineer Transportation Planning, BS Entranco Engineers, Bellevue,Washington:Transportation Engineer Civil Engineering • MS Urban Planning(City and Professional Organizations/Committees Regional Planning) Chaired (10 years)the Streets and Freeways Subcommittee of Metro Former Chair of San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments'(SGVCOG) Public Works REGISTRATION Technical Advisory Committee(TAC) • Registered Civil Engineer Former President for Southern California Section of Institute of Transportation • Licensed Real Estate Broker Engineers(ITE) Member of National Association of City Transportation Officials(NACTO) HIGHLIGHTS Member of American Public Works Association(APWA) • 35 years of past experience Member of City and County Engineers Association(CCEA) in City Traffic Engineering Member of ITE's Urban Traffic Engineering Council and Expert Witness Council • City of Pasadena,California: Member of Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals(APBP) Transportation Member of City Traffic Engineers Association(CTE) Administrator • City of Santa Clarita, PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE California:City Traffic Engineer Transportation Administrator,City Of Pasadena • City of Fremont,California: Pasadena,California: February 2001 to December 2019: Associate Transportation Engineer Prepare and/or review traffic control devices and traffic control plans. Review traffic • City of Palo Alto,California: control plans for construction projects administered by the City forces for various Capital Associate Transportation Improvement Program (CIP) projects,as well as various Traffic Control Plans and Detour Engineer Plans for private development street improvement projects.Review plans for installation of various traffic control devices such as stop signs, traffic signals, flashing beacons, in pavement flashing lights, pedestrian actuated signals,etc. Review plans and specifications for new traffic signal plans and modification to existing traffic signals. Prepare or review intersection improvement projects, intersection widening, signing and channelization plans for roadways and intersections, bicycle lane implementations,and providing Complete Street enhancements at intersections such as roadway narrowing, curb extensions, median installations, corner radii modifications to make them more pedestrian friendly,etc. MIME , TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTEch Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.11 Prepare or review traffic impact studies which includ the four step process of Trip Generation,Trip Assignment, Mode Split,and Capacity Analysis or Level of Service(LOS) analysis using the Highway Capacity Manual methods to identify traffic impacts and formulate mitigation measures to address the impacts. Review the output from Traffic Signal Synchronization and Coordination models to provide signal coordination on arterial streets minimizing traffic delays and stops and promoting platooning and more orderly movement of traffic on arterial streets. Develop goals for Managing Traffic Signal Systems to improve traffic operations and reduce traffic delays. Conduct speed studies and speed management strategies using MUTCD or the previous Traffic Manual's guidelines for preparing the required "Engineering and Traffic Surveys" using the 85%of prevailing speeds and other associated factors such as accident history and conditions not readily apparent to the driver to recommend an appropriate Prima Facie Speed Limit for various arterial streets. Implement various speed management strategies and techniques,including electronic speed feedback signs,flashing beacon and advisory speed limit signs,installation of Speed Cushions(on collectors)or Speed Humps (on residential 25 mph streets), installation of chokers and curb extensions at street corners, reducing curb radii at street corners, potential installation of traffic circles, lane width narrowing, installation of edge lines to further reduce the field of view for drivers, etc. Utilize outputs from various traffic models such as EMME/2,TRANPLAN,and the current SCAG's TransCAD model in performing or reviewing traffic impact studies and Environmental Impact Reports/Statements(EIR or EIS)for various development projects or regional studies. Review the outputs from signal optimization models in review of traffic studies. City Traffic Engineer,City of Santa Clarita Santa Clarita,California: May 1992 to February 2001: Managed the activities of the Traffic Engineering and Inspection Services Division including supervising a staff of twelve people (six Traffic Engineers, five Public Works Inspectors and one Secretary). Prepared the division's operating budget and budget for transportation improvement projects as part of the City's CIP plan.Oversaw all inspection activities for CIP and private development projects.Coordinated all Storm Water permit requirements for all construction projects throughout the City as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Prepared and monitored goals and accomplishments of the Traffic Engineering and Inspection Services Division. Participated in recruiting,coaching,and supervising professional and non-technical staff. Reviewed transportation elements of large size development proposal Environmental Impact Reports(EIR)for consistency with the City's General Plan and monitored level of service at key intersections throughout the City. Prepared various grant applications for transportation improvement projects. Associate Transportation Engineer,City of Fremont Fremont,California:June 1989 to May 1992: Associate Engineer in charge of the Traffic Operations Division. Prepared or reviewed a variety of traffic studies. Prepared or reviewed signing,striping and channelization plans associated with improvement plans for all residential Tract Maps and all City's Public Works Contract (PWC) projects. Prepared detour plans for PWC projects or for special TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Project Management S.rvlces TRANSTECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.12 events such as parades, Art&Wine Festivals, etc. Participated in the Division's budget preparation. Coordinated with Caltrans, Alameda/Contra Costa (AC)Transit, and other agencies regarding various development plans and issues. Associate Transportation Engineer,City of Palo Alto Palo Alto,California: May 1988 to June 1989: Conducted on-going professional level traffic engineering/planning studies. Assisted in preparation and implementation of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects. Designed signing/channelization/pavement markings. Reviewed and prepared Environmental Impact Reports.Prepared and presented Staff Reports to the City Council. Coordinated the work of private consultants. Worked with community groups to solve community concerns. Transportation Engineer,Entranco Engineers Bellevue,Washington:June 1983 to May 1988: Duties included traffic systems analysis,traffic operations studies,traffic impact studies, signalization analysis and design,and street lighting design. Performed traffic operations and traffic analyses for comprehensive transportation planning projects for roadways in both urban and rural areas. Conducted traffic impact analyses for various development projects. Designed more than 20 traffic signals including PS&E documents,for a number of cities in Washington. Used a number of transportation engineering/planning software in various projects and performed signal timing plans using computerized optimization programs for signal systems. Papers/Presentations/Accomplishments • Have presented topics at local Southern California Section of ITE • Presented a topic at first Southern California ITS Summit in October 2006 • Presented a paper at ITE Annual Meeting in Hawaii in June 2006 • Won ITE's best Scribe award among 13 western states for year 1998-1999 • Presented a paper at the 4th International Civil Engineering Conference in May 1997 • Co-authored and published a paper in January 1992 of ITE Journal • Presented papers at ITE Annual Meetings in 1985 and 1991 • Won first place in ITE's student paper contest in 1984 in Seattle TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECFI Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.13 MIKE BENYAMIN, PE, Sr. Engineer, Technical Support for Work requiring Caltrans Review, Processing and Permit Approvals Mr. Benyamin has 30 years of Caltrans experience in various fields of civil engineering, including as Caltrans Local Assistance Engineer managing federally and state funded programs and projects for local agencies, Project Initiation Document (PID), Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED), Plan Specification and Estimate (PS&E), roadway design, transportation design, transportation operation, project management, program management, project funding, and construction engineering. He has specialized in all Federal and State funding for Transportation Construction * ' projects, overseeing the execution of the contracts, reviewing of the plans and specifications,and construction of the projects. His experience at Caltrans includes: Area Project Manager.Office of Local Assistance, 11/1991 to 12/2017 EDUCATION Managing federally and state funded programs and projects for local agencies in Los • BS in Civil Engineering, Angeles and Ventura Counties at Caltrans District 7.Authorize the funds through FHWA • Land Development Desktop, and CTC, conduct meetings with the stake holders, resolve the program and funding AutoCAD,and Microstation issues, suggest funding options and report the progress to the management, conduct Certification initial field review, review and process Right of Way Certification and environmental documents, review Plans Specification and Estimate for correctness and compliance REGISTRATION with the Federal Highway Authority regulations, construction inspection, progress and • Registered Civil Engineer final invoice review and approval. Programs managed: HIGHLIGHTS • Federal Transit authority(FTA)Grants • 30 years of experience with • Surface Transportation Program(STP),(STBG) Caltrans,including as Caltrans • State Transportation Improvement Program(STIP) Local Assistance Engineer • Highway Bridge program(HBP) managing federally and state • Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program(HBRRP) funded programs and projects • Active Transportation Program(ATP) for local agencies • At Grade Railroad Crossing Program • Highway Safety improvement Program(HSIP) Transportation Engineer, Office of Project and Special Studies 7/1991 to 10/1991 Preparing Project Initiation Documents(PID's),Feasibility Studies(FS's)and Preliminary Investigations (PI's). Conducting engineering feasibility of proposed transportation facilities, preparing conceptual plans based on preliminary geometric designs, calculating preliminary cost estimates, preparing presentations, coordinating with stakeholders and local,state and federal agencies and writing draft and final reports. Transportation Engineer,Office of Construction 12/1990 to 6/1991 Performed a wide variety of professional engineering work in an office and field setting. Inspecting progress of the work to assure compliance with contract plans and specifications on all phases of highway construction. Assuring appropriate measurement and payment is made and that project documentation is completed in accordance with departmental policies and procedures. Transportation Engineer,Office of Highway Design 4/1989 to 12/1990 T" Ik TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Protect Management Services tizw Tiran+srEcH Related to SR-T10 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.14 Responsible for the production of engineering reports,contract plans and cost estimates for highway construction projects. Transportation Engineer,Office of Traffic Design, and Operation 6/88 to 3/89 Prepare contract plans(roadway,signing, pavement delineation), quantities,estimates and specifications and prepare Project Study Reports(PSR), Project Reports(PR), other written reports and correspondence. Performing traffic investigations for locations identified through established headquarters safety programs, law enforcement, local agencies,and internal Caltrans departments. �� TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTECh ''' Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.15 DAVID RAGLAND, PE, PLS,QSD, QSP, Engineering,QC/QA Support Mr.Ragland is a civil engineer and land surveyor has over 30 years of diverse experience • in a wide variety of projects in civil engineering. He has managed numerous multi- disciplinary teams dealing with the planning, engineering, entitlement, environmental /_ permitting,development and construction of urban and rural development,and public works projects. His experience also includes special emphasis on complex grading and hillside developments (has worked on the civil engineering and development of more Ir than 40,000 acres of hillside properties), preparation of due diligence and project feasibility analysis, through conceptual planning and design to entitlement and construction. Following is a partial listing of projects representative of Mr. Ragland's diversified experience: General Civil Engineering Projects: EDUCATION • A number of projects in Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County and San • Humboldt State University, Diego County,including roadway,drainage,water,sewer improvements. CA, Bachelor of Science • Parkway Business Centre: Design and construction of the 460 Acre industrial park including South Poway Parkway for ADI Properties, Inc.Also served as Assessment REGISTRATION Engineer for Communities Facilities District. • Registered Civil Engineer • Campus Parkway Roadway: Design of a new roadway for a length of • Licensed Land Surveyor approximately 2 miles, and included street, medians, landscape, lighting, traffic signals,water,sewer,storm drain and various other utilities. HIGHLIGHTS • CalState University Main Access Road: Design of a new roadway for a length of • Civil engineer and land approximately 1.5 miles, and include street, medians, landscape, lighting, traffic surveyor with approximately signals,water,sewer,storm drain and various other utilities. 30 years of diverse • Cannon Roadway and Sewer: Design of approximately 2 miles of roadway and 36 experience in a wide variety inch sewer pipe and pump station. This project required careful consideration to of projects. pipe buckling due to the extreme soils conditions of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. • Managed numerous multi Special bedding techniques were used along with special coupling of the pipes to disciplinary teams dealing allow for potential deflection as the bridge abutment and road fill settled. with the planning, • Lopez Canyon Roadway and Sewer: Design and construction of over 5 miles of engineering,entitlement, roadway sewer ranging up to 36 inches in diameter. environmental permitting, • Sorrento Valley Boulevard: Design and construction of 4 miles of roadway. development and construction of urban and rural development,and Drainage and Sewer Projects: public works projects. • Northpark Boulevard Sewer Extension: Half mile gravity sewer main extension for • In the past 10 years,at University Park Subdivision in the City of San Bernardino. Project required special Transtech, has been working structural designs and encroachment permitting for crossing 100' aqueduct right- as Engineering Manager and of way. providing engineering • University Park Storm Drain Design: Design of storm drain system with pipes services to various Cities. ranging in size from 18 to 60 inches and trapezoidal channel design for 4500 cfs. • Served as Principal Project • Eagle Bice, Muscupiabe Land Area Infrastructure Master Plan (Devore area in San Manager for the design, Bernardino) Drainage, Sewer and Water Master Plan: Approximately 500-acre construction and area for future 1,100-unit master planned community.The project also included a management of a variety of full infrastructure(roadways,storm drain,water,sewer,parks,and utilities)needs projects,including: and assessment and cost analysis for this future development. o Major infrastructure • San Elijo Ranch Drainage,Sewer and Water Master Plan,San Marcos: 2,000 acres projects for public / 3500-unit master planned community. The project included literally miles of agencies(Freeway storm drain, sewer and water lines, sedimentation areas, pump stations, booster Interchanges, stations, water reservoirs and force mains. Cannon Road Trunk Sewer and Pump Station-Design of 8-12-inch gravity sewer,6-and 8-inch force main,pump station (r4 ,e1 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Protect Management Services TRAIYSTEC{! Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.16 Roadways,Water, and wet well. City of Carlsbad Storm Drain and • Penasquitos Canyon Trunk Sewer: PS&E for two miles 36-inch gravity sewer Sewer Facilities and including design study reports.City of San Diego Master Plans). • Ranch Santa Fe Road: Relocation and rehabilitation of 1.5 miles of sewer main. o Commercial and Retail City of San Marcos Development. • Arrowhead Springs Drainage,Sewer and Water Master Plan: 4,000-acre site at the o Master Planned foothills of San Bernardino Mountains, and includes 1,500 to 2,000 residential Communities. units, 1,000,000 square feet of commercial and office space, 199-acre/18-hole o Residential public golf course, renovation and reuse of the historic Arrowhead Springs Hotel Development. with a new 115 room annex, new 300-room hotel, a conference center, 14-acre o Educational/University corporate office area. Infrastructure Master • Otay River hydrology study and dam breach analysis: 22,000-acre Otay Ranch Plan Studies and project in Chula Vista. Flows up to 33,000 cfs were studied for the Otay River. Development. • Extensive experience in Water Projects: working with Caltrans and • City of San Diego,Green Valley Water line design and construction.5000 feet,30" County of Los Angeles. Reinforced concrete water line and pressure reducing station and details for • Extensive experience in connection to a 60-inch San Diego County Water Authority Pipeline. NPDES requirements. • City of San Diego,Structural arch and encasement designs for road crossings over • Extensive experience in the various SDCWA pipelines up to 108 inches in diameter. management and • City of San Diego, Design and construction of Mercy Road pressure booster. administration of federally • City of San Bernardino, Design of 3500 feet of 20 to 36-inch ductile iron water and state funded projects in transmission main for the development of University Park. compliance with Caltrans • City of San Bernardino, Design of over 10,000 feet of 8 through 12-inch DIP water Local Assistance Procedures main for water distribution. Manual(LAPM). • City of San Bernardino, Structural arch design for road crossing over the Dept of • Estimated valuation of Water Resources 109-inch Santa Ana pipeline. projects that Mr. Ragland • City of San Marcos Structural arch and encasement designs for road crossings over has been involved is various SDCWA pipelines up to 108 inches in diameter. approximately • Design of 30-inch CMLC steel water transmission main and pressure reducing $1,000,000,000. stations. Included structural designs for hanging the waterline on a bridge. • City of Carlsbad, Design of many thousands of feet of PVC and DIP water lines for multiple subdivisions in the City with Carlsbad Municipal Water District and the Olivenhain Water District. Master Plans: • San Elijo Hills Specific Plan. Provided planning, engineering, surveying services for the design and development of the 2,000-acre 3,500 dwelling unit Specific Plan and Master Tentative Map. • Shandin Hills Specific Plan. Provided planning engineering services for the preparation of the Specific Plan and Tentative Map. The project is a proposed 240- acre 1049 dwelling unit community. • Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan (including annexation into the City): 4,000-acre site, which includes 1,500 to 2,000 residential units, 1,000,000 square feet of commercial and office space, 199-acre/18-hole public golf course, renovation and reuse of the historic Arrowhead Springs Hotel with a new 115 room annex, new 300-room hotel,a conference center, 14-acre corporate office area. • Eagle Bice, Muscupiabe Land Area Infrastructure Master Plan Drainage,Sewer and Water Master Plan: Approximately 500-acre area for future 1,100-unit master planned community. The project also included a full infrastructure (roadways, storm drain, water, sewer, parks, and utilities) needs and assessment and cost analysis for this future development. __ TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-17, ProJ�t Managamant Services TRANSTfCIi Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.17 • University Development Master Plan: Approximately 200 acre site in association with the City of San Bernardino, Watson Development and Cal-State SB for the development of 200 residential, mixed use, live-work, retail, office and student housing,educational and training facilities and offices for Cal State SB University. c7) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.18 MICHAEL ACKERMAN, PE,QSD,QSP,QISP,Engineering Review Support i Mr.Ackerman has over 20 years of experience. AI • At Transtech,he has been working as a Sr. Engineer at various Transtech City Engineering �� „ P Contracts. He has served at various Cities under Transtech's City Engineering Contracts, 4 4,11t .•"* a including Temple City, Huntington Park, and Alhambra. Mr. Ackerman managed le i. Engineering and CIP, attended and coordinated with COG Regional Transportation - Planning,GWMA Gateway Water Management Association,and Los Angeles Upper Reach 2 Storm Water Management Group. He is very familiar with the local and regional agencies and goals. He has a broad knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, 4%, i and interaction with public,various city departments, city council and other ' `r / governmental agencies. Mr.Ackerman's experience also includes working at Caltrans and other agencies: EDUCATION • Bachelor of Science in Caltrans District 8: Mr.Ackerman was a civil transportation engineer for Caltrans District Engineering,the University 8 where he was involved in the design and construction of various projects. of Iowa • Construction Division: In the Construction Division, Mr. Ackerman was Resident • Land Development Desktop, Engineer for various projects,including: AutoCAD Civil 3D,and o Watson Wash Bridge Replacement Right(Rte 40) Microstation Certification- o Replacement of Drains and Earthwork(Rte 40) Westech College o Fenner Overhead Bridge Replacement (Replacement of two bridges over BNSF Railroad, Rte 40). REGISTRATION • Design Division: Designed plans,specifications,and estimates for the rehabilitation of • Registered Civil Engineer Route 10 freeway from the Riverside/San Bernardino County line to Beaumont. • Traffic Operations Division: Performed studies and analyses to interpret and mitigate CERTIFICATIONS above average accident volume areas on highways and freeways. Also,he performed • Resident Engineer Academy, traffic studies. Caltrans • Water Pollution Control City of San Bernardino: Mr.Ackerman held the position of Associate Engineer under City Compliance on Construction Engineer of the Division of Public Works in the Department of Development Services. He Sites for Resident Engineers, was involved in many projects including Development Review and Plan Check,design and Caltrans review of Street Improvement Plans,Rough and Precise Grading Plans,Sewer Plans,Storm • Asphalt Pavement Drain Plans,Street Lighting Plans,Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans,Water Quality Fundamentals: Design, Management Plans, Geotechnical Reports, and Hydrology/Hydraulic Studies, land Construction,and development, industrial, commercial, residential, and transportation development Rehabilitation projects including Tract and Parcel Maps. He also directed and performed plan check of • Construction Program improvement plans submitted by developers to the City. Also,he represented the City of Management Workshop, San Bernardino at the South Tehachapi Management Team meetings, coordinated with FHWA San Bernardino County Flood Control and FEMA for the certification of City levees and • Field Office Procedures updating of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM),and oversaw permitting and tracking Course,Caltrans of Land Development Projects through the Division of Public Works/Engineering. In • California Work Zone addition to this, Mr. Ackerman has worked intimately with Planning and Building and Inspection—High Speed, Safety Divisions on Land Development Projects. Caltrans • Asphalt Concrete Inspection City of Huntington Park: Mr. Ackerman worked as contract City Engineer under and Rehabilitation Transtech's municipal services contract and later as City Engineer and Interim Director of Strategies,Caltrans Public Works under the City. HIGHLIGHTS As City Engineer,Mr.Ackerman performed the following responsibilities: • 20 years of experience in • Planned,coordinated,and directed the activities of the Engineering Division; ‘...0 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.19 City Engineering. • Supervised the preparation of designs, specifications, plans, estimates and reports • Experience includes working involved in the construction of public works engineering projects, such as storm for Caltrans and City of San drains,sewer systems,and water facilities; Bernardino. • Reviewed and approved engineering plans,specification and contract documents; • At Caltrans,served as • Analyzed bids and supervises the preparation of contracts; Resident Engineer for many • Supervised building construction by outside contractors on special projects; projects. • Provided technical assistance and consults with other departments, agencies, • At City of San Bernardino, commission,and other bodies on engineering matters; worked under the City Engineer,and was • Prepared reports for the various governing bodies concerning economic comparison, responsible for Capital environmental impact studies, subdivisions, land use conversion, and capital Projects. improvements • Extensive experience in • Planned, coordinated and directed the traffic engineering functions of the City working with Caltrans. including traffic control device installations,traffic studies and local and regional area • Extensive experience in traffic growth management; NPDES requirements. • Site visits to various locations to conduct field and construction inspections,surveying, • Extensive experience in the and perform other engineering activities; management and • Administered the use of revenue obtained through subventions from the State and administration of federally County; and state funded projects in • Represented the Division to other City departments, elected officials and outside compliance with Caltrans agencies; explained and justified Engineering Division programs, policies and Local Assistance Procedures activities; negotiated and resolved sensitive,significant and controversial issues; Manual(LAPM). • Managed and participated in the development and administration of the Engineering • Served as Resident Engineer Division budget; participated in the preparation of and implement budgetary on several Federally Funded adjustments; Projects. • Coordinated Engineering Division activities with those of other departments and outside agencies and organizations;provided staff assistance to the City Manager and City Council; prepared and presented staff reports and other necessary correspondence; • Directed the work involved in the custody of maps,charts and other records dealing with City owned facilities; • Supervised and evaluated subordinate staff; • Responded to citizen inquiries and resolve difficult and sensitive complaints;and • Participated on a variety of boards and commissions; attended and participated in professional group meetings; stayed abreast of new trends and innovations in the engineering field. Public Works Projects Experience: Mr. Ackerman has also served as Project Design Engineer, Project Manager, and Construction Manager/Resident Engineer on a number of projects. Partial listing of projects representative of his project experience on recent projects include: • Project Engineer for City of Commerce, Garfield Avenue Telegraph Road to Malt Avenue Street Improvements; Eastern Avenue Pavement Overlay Stevens Through City Boundary; Garfield Avenue and Slauson Avenue Intersection Improvements; Washington/Ayers Intersection: Prepared PS&E. Federally funded projects as part of Stimulus Program. • Project Engineer for City of Baldwin Park, Francisquito Avenue Overlay Project; Ramona Boulevard Overlay Project: Prepared PS&E. Federally funded projects as part of Stimulus Program. • Project Engineer for City of San Bernardino,Sewer upgrade project: Preparation of a project PS&E for upgrade of main sewer lines at various locations per the City's Sewer Master Plan. ~r. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.20 • Project Engineer for City of Commerce - Master Sewer Study Telegraph Corridor re- vitalization project: Documentation of existing system.Design capacity analysis based upon land use designations. Produced master plan study report for the project along with cost estimates. • Resident Engineer for Rosemead Safety and Enhancement and ADA Improvements Project. Served as the Resident Engineer for the Rosemead Safety and Enhancement Project. The project includes widening and reconstruction of 2 miles of Rosemead Boulevard,including new medians,bike lanes,signals,sidewalks,curb&gutter,street lighting, landscape, street scape. The project is federally funded and is managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Cost$20m. • Principal CM/Resident Engineer for Valley Boulevard Rehabilitation and ADA Improvements Project (Federally Funded), Alhambra: Project involved reconstruction, pavement overlay, medians, landscape, curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signals and other misc. improvements. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Project also involved coordination with Caltrans for work at the 710 Freeway ramps under Caltrans Encroachment Permit. Project was completed in various phases, including nigh time construction for several phases, to minimize inconvenience to public on this heavily travelled major Arterial. • Principal CM/Resident Engineer for New Avenue, from North to South City Limit Rehabilitation and ADA Improvements Project(Federally Funded),Alhambra: Project involved reconstruction, pavement overlay, curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signals and other misc. improvements. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Project also involved coordination with Caltrans for work at the 1-10 Freeway ramps under Caltrans Encroachment Permit. • Principal CM/Resident Engineer for Garfield Rehabilitation and ADA Improvements Project (Federally Funded), Alhambra: Project involved reconstruction, pavement overlay, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and other misc. improvements. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. • Principal CM/Resident Engineer for City of San Bernardino, Via Duct Boulevard/2nd Street Realignment Project: Prepared PS&E and served as Construction Manager/Resident Engineer. • Project Engineer for CSUSB(Cal State SB University)San Bernardino Main Access Road: Prepared PS&E and provided construction administration for the project. Project involved design of a new roadway for a length of approximately 1.5 miles,and include street, medians, landscape, lighting, traffic signals, water, sewer, storm drain and various other utilities. • Project Engineer for CSUSB (Cal State SB University) Perimeter Road for CSUSB Palm Desert Campus: Prepared PS&E for the project. Improvements included street,water, landscape,grading,drainage,street lighting and various other improvements. • Project Engineer for CSUSB (Cal State SB University): Campus Health Center Expansion: Prepared PS&E for the project for grading, utilities and civil engineering. • Project Engineer for University of California, Riverside-West Campus Infrastructure: Prepared West Campus Infrastructure Development Design/Study, which identified utility and surface infrastructure requirements, and how these improvements could be phased to accommodate proposed campus growth, for an area of 236.8 acres to support approximately 5 million gross square feet of academic,research,support,and student housing facilities. • Project Engineer for City of San Bernardino Campus Parkway Roadway Design: Prepared PS&E as well as provided construction management and inspection services TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.21 for the project. Improvements included street,water,sewer,storm drain,landscape, street lighting,traffic signal, and signing and striping. ' O / .� TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSIECh � Related to 3R-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.22 LISSETTE MONTOYA,Measure R Fund Quarterly Reports,Reimbursement, FTIP Program Updates Support Vir I Ms. Montoya has approximately 20 years of comprehensive expertise in project ff management and analysis, funding management, grant administration, and community •$ outreach programs.She is experienced in issues impacting City governments and contract .b.. administration. Ms. Montoya is the Vice-President and CFO of Avant-Garde. She has 411k -e* ii' experience in identifying federal and state fund allocation balances, programming funds, and administers long-and-short range programs consistent with the economic capabilities of the City. Ms. Montoya directs the Program Management team to ensure that projects ,. 1 are developed in accordance with policy and procedural requirements, assists in determining eligible projects for various funding sources,and manages development and capital improvement programs/projects from conception to completion. Ms. Montoya has assisted various agencies in performing a variety of analyses and studies to identify State and Federal funding options; performed time-critical and confidential studies related to fiscal and administrative requirements of grant programs;assisted in the grants solicitation process; planned and coordinated the implementation of awarded grants to EDUCATION ensure that the City was in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and • California State Polytechnic monitored and audited grant expenses. Under her direction, our team has successfully University Pomona: Master monitored federal and state funding for municipal agencies throughout Southern of Business Administration; California and written grants to secure over $438 million in funding for government in process. agencies. • Bachelor of Science in Business Management. PROJECT EXPERIENCE • A.A.General Studies,Mount San Antonio College Ms. Montoya and her team have extensive experience in grant writing, project monitoring, labor compliance and funding administration services to ensure that the HIGHLIGHTS funding secured is spent per the requirements of the funding agency and within the • Extensive Experience in required timelines. She also has experience in strategic budget planning specifically with various funding programs Capital Improvement Programs. and assisting local agencies for fund compliance, Ms. Montoya is proficient in managing and preparing funding reimbursement requests quarterly reports, and reporting through various agencies (FHWA, Metro,Caltrans, HUD)for various multi- reimbursement submittals, million-dollar projects. This includes programing projects in the Federal Transportation FTIP updates. Improvement Program, processing of fund exchanges and preparing funding packages to Metro(Call for Projects,Local Return,Discretional Funding),the California Transportation Commission, Caltrans and FHWA. Ms. Montoya, has completed the lengthy process to receive federal security clearance to access the FHWA database for TIGER reporting purposes. Ms. Montoya is very familiar with the Caltrans Local Assistance Process and preparing the necessary submittals to obtain Caltrans approvals for Environmental and Right of Way clearances, and securing obligation (E76) of funds for design and construction projects. Ms. Montoya and her team are currently providing funding administration services to the following cities: Alhambra, Bell Gardens, Cudahy, Commerce, El Monte, Industry, La Mirada, Lynwood, Manhattan Beach, Montebello, Monterey Park, Norwalk,Placentia, La Canada Flintridge,Carson,Culver City, Pico Rivera, Rosemead,Santa Monica,South El Monte,Ventura and West Covina. Project Examples: • Industry's 57/60 Confluence Project:Avant-Garde has been heavily involved with the Confluence Project, assisting in securing over $18 million in funding for the project through the TIGER Discretionary Grant Program and Metro's Call for Projects,as well as organizing outreach activities including the development of materials, delivery of public presentations,and development and maintenance of the www.freetheway.org TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-77, Project Management ServicesTRANSTEC{f Related to 15R-710 North Corridor Mobility improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.23 website. Ms. Montoya, has completed the lengthy process to receive federal security clearance to access the FHWA database for future TIGER reporting purposes. Ms. Montoya oversees the preparation of all project agreements and related documents; the tracking of project expenditures and reimbursement ratios; and preparation and submittal of quarterly progress reporting and reimbursement requests to Metro. Ms. Montoya served at the City's representative in Caltrans PDT meetings. • Local Highway Bridge Program: Avant-Garde programmed Local Highway Bridge Funds for Azusa Avenue Bridge($5.2 million)and Nelson Avenue Bridge($2.4 million). Ms. Montoya is managing the overall implementation of the project, including coordinating with impacted neighboring cities and Caltrans. Management responsibilities include, working with the City Attorney, issuing RFQ/RFP's, management of the project schedule and oversee all matters related to finance, grants, and administration.This project is being administered in accordance with the Caltrans Local Programs Procedures Manual. • Lemon Avenue Interchange Project: The cities of Diamond Bar and Industry constructed a new interchange on SR-60 at Lemon Avenue.The proposed project improves traffic operations by providing direct access to SR-60 from the surrounding areas.Avant-Garde provides Program Management Services on behalf of the City of Industry. Avant-Garde provided oversight of activities including the overall project schedule and provide as-needed advisement on matters of finance, grants, and administration to both cities of Industry and Diamond Bar.The overall project budget was approximately $18 million and included federal funds and successfully worked with Metro to exchange Federal funds to local funds.Ms.Montoya served at the City's representative in Caltrans PDT meetings. • Rosemead Blvd Beautification and Enhancements Project: Avant-Garde provided funding administration services for this$20 million federally funded project(total of 14 funding sources). Avant-Garde coordinated with the design engineer, project management team and City staff to ensure that the project was implemented in accordance with State and Federal funding guidelines, as well as provide fiscal advisement on the uses of local funds for various aspects of construction activities. In addition,Avant-Garde secured$3.8 million of grant funds for the project. r. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSIECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.24 MEGAN LENOUE,Measure R Fund Quarterly Reports,Reimbursement,FTIP Program Updates Support I * '° , Ms. LeNoue has seven years of experience in administrative and municipal program ' ' services and contract administration. Her overall experience includes grant research and writing,funding administration, project management and analysis, community outreach support, labor compliance monitoring, and construction management assistance. As a Senior Program Coordinator,Ms.LeNoue has worked in conjunction with the project managers of the company and served as a liaison to provide support on various projects. One of her main responsibilities is assisting clients with preparing and administering programs as required by federal and state funding agencies to ensure projects are developed in accordance with policy and procedural guidelines. Ms. LeNoue is proficient • in preparing funding reimbursement requests and quarterly reporting through various u F 1,a, .:;az4; -. agencies (FHWA, Metro, Caltrans, CaIOES) for various multi-million-dollar projects. Ms. , R ' , ' ,; LeNoue assists clients in successful administration of funding requirements and program 1 ,R,,r, ff t—, A management. Her responsibilities have included interfacing with Federal,State and Local a �•r .. Agencies to define, develop and manage project scopes, schedules, cooperative EDUCATION agreements, and overall project management to ensure projects are delivered on time • BA,St. Mary's College,CA and on schedule. • Bachelor of Science in x Ms. LeNoue assists clients by identifying federal and state fund allocation balances, HIGHLIGHTS writing grant proposal applications, assisting in determining eligible projects, and • Extensive Experience in providing advisement of program requirements. She oversees the development, various funding programs completion, and administration of grant programs. Her resourcefulness and efficacy in and assisting local agencies working with our team of grant writers helps ensure a seamless process that results in for fund compliance, qualitative work. Ms. LeNoue ensures proper delegation of tasks to the team of grant quarterly reports, writers and ascertains grant assignments are completed in a timely manner. After reimbursement submittals, assisting the City in developing a strong project plan that best meets the goals and FTIP updates. objectives of the grant,Ms. LeNoue utilizes her grant writing skills to create narrative with clear, specific language which focuses the reviewer's attention and increases the likelihood of funding the proposed project. Ms. LeNoue is adept at researching information to assist in her development of project narrative and building a strong argument for a competitive project. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Call for Projects/Measure R-Metro • City of Industry • City of Bell Gardens • City of Commerce • City of El Monte • City of Monterey Local Streets&Roads Program-CTC • City of Montebello • City of El Monte TIGER Program-FHWA • City of Industry Hazard Mitigation Program–CaIOES • City of Lynwood ATP&SB1 Funded Project Reporting-CTC TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSrEEch Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.25 • City of Montebello • City of El Monte • City of Lynwood Federal Transportation Improvement Program -SCAG • City of Industry • City of El Monte • City of Alhambra • City of Commerce • City of Monterey Park • City of Rosemead • City of West Covina • City of Bell Gardens • City of Montebello City of Industry Assisting with administering federal and state funds for the Grand Avenue/SR-60 On-ramp and Off-ramp projects, Grand Avenue/Golden Springs Road Intersection project, and Lemon Avenue project. Processes quarterly reporting with Metro and FHWA, submits reimbursement requests to Caltrans and Metro,attends Caltrans PDT meetings,monitors project schedules and expenditures, and manages agreements and/or other miscellaneous project documents. Ms. LeNoue coordinates with the project engineering teams, funding agencies (Caltrans, Metro, FHWA), City staff, and finance/accounting departments to ensure project delivery, project programming, and preparation and submittal of funding requests and/or required reporting. Ms. LeNoue also assists with miscellaneous administrative support activities such as preparation of agenda reports, community relations support,and preparation of informational materials. City of Bell Gardens Ms. LeNoue has assisted the City with identifying funding opportunities for a variety of projects; development of project particulars including project budget and schedule; development and production of grant applications; administration of grant awarded projects; and program compliance with the various funding agencies. Ms. LeNoue is currently providing grant administration services on the City's Complete Streets Plan development project; General Plan Circulation Element Update project; federal transit vehicle purchase project;near-zero emission heavy-duty truck purchase project;and two Metro CFP projects—all of which she secured the awarded competitive grant funds for the City. Each of the programs has its own administration requirements and formats for quarterly/annual reporting and reimbursement requests requiring coordination with the City and construction or design teams. te` / rwl) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSiECII Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.26 MELISSA DEMIRCI,RSP,Public Relations,Funding,Management Support Ms. Demirci has over 10 years of experience as a Project Manager,Traffic&Transportation Analyst,Associate Engineer, Grant Writer, and Funds Coordinator. She has her BS Degree in Civil Engineering from Cal Poly Pomona. Melissa Demirci leads our Grant Writing and Funds Management program as well as serves as one of Transtech's representative for Traffic Engineering Services at various Cities, prepares traffic safety and calming studies, stop and I .. * signal warrants/studies, traffic impact studies, traffic calming reports, parking studies, responds to requests from Public and City Officials and attends Traffic Commission, Planning Commission,City Council Meetings.She works directly with staff in the departments of public } works, planning, engineering and community development at each client city. She also do contacts, meets with residents representing city staff in assisting in the resolution of local I ., traffic problems and concerns. After meeting with residents, she prepares and presents reports and recommendations to various city staff and agencies. She has also attended community forums and neighborhood block meetings to discuss and answer questions about _ current and future traffic conditions. She has also been part of the preparation of traffic EDUCATION impact studies for development projects in Southern California, which involves the • BS,Civil Engineering,Cal coordination with developers,as well as local and regional agencies. Poly Pomona,2010 • Chi Epsilon,Civil Engineering Ms. Demirci also has extensive experience in Transportation Planning. She has prepared Honor Society several transportation related grant applications and helped facilitate over $100 million in funding for clients'public works and transportation improvement projects. HIGHLIGHTS • Licensed Road Safety She has worked in the Public Works Department and assists in the preparation of staff Professional (RSP) reports, contract administration, RFP preparation, CIP Budget preparation, bid analysis, • Over 10 years of Experience budgeting,traffic safety and calming studies,stop and signal warrants/studies,traffic impact • Serves as a Traffic studies,traffic calming reports,and responding to requests from Public and City Officials. She Representative for several also prepares grant applications for transportation related projects including detailed figures, Traffic Authorities and diagrams, and exhibits. Ms. Demirci regularly attends Traffic Commission and City Council Traffic Commissions Meetings presenting on various items. Her Prior experience includes working as in the Energy • Secured over$20M in and Environment Department of the Mayor's preparing transportation infrastructure grants federal and state and project management for 3 years at the City of Los Angeles while completing her civil transportation grants funds engineering degree at Cal Poly. for various agencies • Completed Caltrans She is well versed in Caltrans and Local Assistance construction filing and document system. Resident Engineer Academy She served as Office Engineer responsible for all Caltrans documentation as well as • Very familiar with the Community Outreach for the Rte 71/Mission Grade Separation Project (Federally Funded, management and $40m), Washington BI Widening and Reconstruction Project(Federally Funded, $38m), and administration of federally the Bogert Trail Bridge Widening Project ($5M). Her rolls included all community funded projects in correspondence,community meeting presentations and organization, public notices,etc. compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Examples of her project experience includes: Manual(LAPM) • Served as Office Engineer for Traffic and Transportation Engineering Experience(2008-present) Rte 71/Mission Grade • City of Commerce, City of Monterey Park and City of Temple City; Contract Traffic Separation Project Engineering Support: As part of Transtech's Municipal Services Contract, Melissa (Federally Funded,$40M Demirci serves as the Transtech representative for Traffic Engineering Services. In this project). capacity she assists the City Engineer with traffic safety requests, reviews and prepares • Served as Office Engineer for traffic scoping documents for new developments, reviews traffic impact studies Rosemead Boulevard submitted by consultants to the City and provides comments for areas of concern as the Complete Streets Project Cities representative. She also attends meetings with potential developers,development (Federally and State Funded, services department and engineering staff representing traffic engineering. $20M project). • City of Alhambra, Contract Traffic Engineering Support: As part of Transtech's 1161•161111.101111111111 c--i ' ../' MEM r TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSrECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.27 • Prior experience includes Municipal Services Contract, Melissa Demirci serves as the Transtech representative for working as in the Energy and Traffic Engineering Services. In this capacity she prepares traffic safety and calming Environment Department studies, stop and signal warrants/studies, traffic impact studies, responds to City preparing infrastructure requests,citizen complaints and attends Traffic Commission meetings. Part of her duties grants and CIP project also includes assessing safety for pedestrians, buses and bicycles by reviewing master management for 3 years at plans completed for transit and bicycles as well as safe walk to school routes the City of Los Angeles. • Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies(TIA): These studies are prepared to assess transportation impacts of proposed developments and to determine the changes in traffic and traffic control devices that will be needed in the future with the added development or land use change.The preparation of TIA's includes; Identification of impact mitigation plans, coordination with City or agency planning and traffic engineering departments. This includes the supervision of field technicians and in the field collection of traffic related data,preparing a local traffic model,conducting a level of service analysis at each study intersection and street segment, identification of mitigation measures and report preparation.Some sample project's that Melissa has been responsible for preparing include: o Private Development Projects TIA's: - Queen of Angels Church—Riverside - Condo Development project—San Gabriel - City of Palmdale—Residential Mixed Use TIA - City of Corona—Commercial Center, Industrial Center - City of Anaheim—Car Wash,Gas Station and Market - City of Chino—Andy's Burgers o CMP Traffic Monitoring Program: - City of Alhambra - City of Temple City - City of Huntington Park • Engineering and Radar Speed Survey for Various Cities: This task included the radar field survey,field observations, and calculation of 85th percentile speeds, preparation of overall city maps and preparation of final report.Various Cities some of which include: - City of Alhambra • School Site Review: This task includes the observation and analysis of school sites as related to traffic and safety. This includes suggesting drop off/pick up procedures for parents and buses, driveway assessment and signage, field review of existing signing, striping, school drop off, pick up, school crosswalks, sidewalks, crossing guard locations and the identification of future measures that will improve the traffic safety. Some schools included: - City of Alhambra—City-wide as needed - City of Temple City—City-wide as needed - City of Huntington Park—City-wide as needed - City of Commerce—City-wide as needed - City of Rosemead—City-wide as needed • Focused Parking Studies for Various Cities and Developers: This task included conducting existing inventory counts in the field and assisting cities to come up with solutions to parking demands. • Safe Route to School Program: This task includes field review of existing signing,striping, school drop off, pick up, school crosswalks, sidewalks, crossing guard locations and the identification of future measures that will improve the traffic safety. Sample programs were conducted for: City of Alhambra—City-wide as needed; City of Temple City—City- wide as needed;City of Huntington Park—City-wide as needed , / \ „r,) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No..2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECk Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.28 Public Works Department Experience (2010-present): As part of Transtech's Municipal saareaernmen./ Services,Ms.Demirci provided services to various client cities as assistant to the Public Works Director and City Engineer. Her tasks include: • Preparation of CIP Budget (5-year CIP budget $100M+) and attend and participate in meetings and conferences with City boards and commissions, City departments, public officials, professional organizations and contractors regarding requirements for public works projects, land development/subdivision projects and other matters relating to areas of assigned responsibilities.As well as prepare Staff Reports and Presentations for Council Meetings,Commission Meetings, and Ad-Hoc Committees as well as a variety of reports,correspondence and special studies. Grant Writing Experience (2010-present): Ms. Demirci also prepares grant applications for transportation projects, awarded grants she worked on,below is a partial listing: • City of Rosemead: 2015 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Garvey Avenue Regional Access &Capacity Improvement Project,Award Amount:$2,315,305 • City of Rosemead:2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP)Cycle 7,Installation of HAWK system,Award Amount:$241,300 • LRSP (Local Road Safety Plan) Caltrans Grants for 11 agencies totaling $529,000 in awarded funds. The agencies include Rosemead ($48,000), Temple City ($40,000), Commerce ($40,000), San Marino ($40,000), South El Monte ($40,000), West Covina ($84,000), Big Bear Lake ($40,000), Cudahy ($40,000), Monterey Park ($51,000), Alhambra ($62,000),and Covina($44,000) • City of Monterey Park: 2015 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Monterey Pass Road Complete Streets Bike Project,Award Amount:$1,993,627 • City of Alhambra: 2013 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Alhambra Ped Improvement/Walking Viability Project on Valley,Award Amount:$323,427 • City of San Gabriel: 2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 7, Signal Safety Enhancements Project,Award Amount:$569,800 • City of San Gabriel: 2016 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 8, Install overhead flashing beacon,Award Amount:$270,200 • City of Huntington Park: 2015 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle III, Citywide Uncontrolled Crosswalk Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project, Award Amount: $1,757,000 • City of Huntington Park:2016 Active Transportation Program(ATP)Cycle II,Uncontrolled Crosswalk SRTS Ped Safety Project,Award Amount:$1,032,000 • City of Cudahy: 2015 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle II, Wilcox Avenue Complete Streets and SRTS Project,Award Amount:$1,344,000 • City of Cudahy:2015 Metro(MTA)Call for Projects,Cudahy City Wide Complete Streets Improvement Project,Award Amount:$2,134,449 • City of Cudahy: 2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP) Cycle 7,Salt Lake Ave Safety Project,Award Amount:$363,180 • City of Cudahy: 2016 Active Transportation Program(ATP)Cycle III,Atlantic Ave Bicycle and Ped Enhancement Project,Award Amount:$1,784,000 • City of Pico Rivera: 2016 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 8, Sign Improvements,Award Amount:$696,300 • City of Commerce: 2013 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Commerce Goods Movement Atlantic Blvd:Washington to Como,Award Amount:$631,137 • City of Commerce: 2016-17 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program (Cal Recycle), Award Amount:$281,400 �e TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Proj Managomont Sorvlcos TRANSTEch Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.29 111.11.111111 b. KAREN VIGIL,PTP,EIT,Public Relations,Funding,Management Support rik,' 1 Ms. Vigil has approximately 5 years of experience in Transportation and Traffic -- Engineering, and Grant Writing. She has worked in the Public Works Department and Building and Safety Department and assists in the preparation of staff reports, contract A administration, RFP preparation, bid analysis, budgeting, traffic safety and calming studies,stop and signal warrants/studies,traffic impact studies,traffic calming reports, parking studies, and responding to requests from Public and City Officials. She also prepares grant applications for transportation related projects including detailed '' figures, diagrams, and exhibits. She has helped facilitated about$15 million in funding for clients' public works and transportation improvement projects iii Examples of her project experience includes: 1 Public Works Department Experience(2016-2017) Rosemead-Assistant City Traffic Engineer EDUCATION As part of Transtech's Municipal Services, Ms. Vigil worked for one year in the City of • BS,Civil Engineering,Cal Rosemead as assistant to the Public Works Director and City Engineer. Her tasks Poly Pomona 2013 included the following: REGISTRATION ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS • Professional Transportation • Prepare Staff Reports and Presentations for Council Meetings, Commission Planner(PTP) Meetings,and Ad-Hoc Committees HIGHLIGHTS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL'S • Serves as a Traffic Analysts • Prepare Requests for Qualifications and Proposals (RFQ's and RFP's) to hire and Associate Engineer for consultants and outside contractors to perform services for City projects. several Traffic Authorities • Analyze submitted proposals and bids and Traffic Commissions. • Prepare staff reports for City Council meetings. • Serves as assistant to City Engineer and Public Works TRAFFIC COMMISSION Director preparing • Traffic Commission items coordinator. budgeting,contract • Point of contact for Traffic Commission related items. management,staff report • Prepare staff reports for Traffic Commission items. writing,and misc.items. • Attend and participate in Traffic Commission meetings. • Bilingual in both written and spoken Spanish PLAN CHECK REVIEW • Extensive experience in • Participate in the plan check, review, and processing of plans for private diagram and conceptual developments affecting city streets, sewers, drains, and related public works preparation for design. facilities and ensure that they all meet City imposed requirements. • Secured over$15M in • Coordinate with other departments such as Planning and Building Department for federal and state grant Plan Checks funds for various agencies OTHER TASKS • Respond to inquiries and requests for information from the general public, contractors,and other agencies. • Prepare memos,letters,and field reports in the course of performing work. • Assist in the preparation of Engineering Division budget. • Attend and participate in meetings and conferences with City boards and commissions, City departments, public officials, professional organizations and contractors regarding requirements for public works projects, land r_, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.30 development/subdivision projects and other matters relating to areas of assigned responsibilities. • Prepare a variety of reports,correspondence and special studies. Traffic and Transportation Engineering Experience(2010-present) Temple City,Alhambra,Rosemead,Commerce,Monterey Park Huntington Park, Cudahy Traffic Commission: As part of Transtech's Municipal Services Contract, Ms. Vigil also assists in the preparation of traffic safety and calming studies, stop and signal warrants/studies,traffic impact studies,calming reports,responding to requests from Public and City Officials. She also attends Traffic Commission meetings and assists in presentations of reports. Focused Parking Studies for Various Cities and Developers: This task included conducting existing inventory counts in the field and assisting cities to come up with solutions to parking demands. School Site Review: This task includes the observation and analysis of school sites as related to traffic and safety.This includes suggesting drop off/pick up procedures for parents and buses,driveway assessment and signage. Safe Route to School Program: This task includes field review of existing signing,striping,school drop off,pick up,school crosswalks,sidewalks,crossing guard locations and the identification of future measures that will improve the traffic safety.Sample programs were conducted for: - City of Alhambra—City-wide as needed - City of Temple City—City-wide as needed - City of Huntington Park—City-wide as needed Grant Writing Experience(2014-present): Ms.Vigil also prepares grant applications for transportation projects,awarded grants she worked on include: • City of Monterey Park:2018 Active Transportation Program(ATP)Cycle 4,Citywide School and Crosswalk Safety Improvements Project, Awarded Funding Amount: $1,367,000 • City of Monterey Park: 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP) Cycle 9, Signal Safety Enhancement Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$540,000 • City of Alhambra: 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 9, Pedestrian Safety Improvements at Signalized Intersections Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$600,000 • City of South El Monte: 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP) Cycle 9, Signal Safety Enhancement Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$876,000 • City of Commerce: 2018-19 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program (Cal Recycle), Awarded Funding Amount:$348,600 • City of Commerce: 2016-17 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program (Cal Recycle), Awarded Funding Amount:$281,400 • City of Rosemead: 2015 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Garvey Avenue Regional Access&Capacity Improvement Project,Award Amount:$2,315,305 • City of Rosemead: 2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 7, Installation of HAWK system,Award Amount:$241,300 • City of Monterey Park: 2015 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Monterey Pass Road Complete Streets Bike Project,Award Amount:$1,993,627 Apo" MINI= TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management ServicesTeansrECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.31 • City of Alhambra: 2013 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Alhambra Ped Improvement/Walking Viability Project on Valley,Award Amount:$323,427 • City of San Gabriel:2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP)Cycle 7,Signal Safety Enhancements Project,Award Amount:$569,800 • City of San Gabriel: 2016 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 8, Install overhead flashing beacon,Award Amount:$270,200 • City of Huntington Park: 2015 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle III, Citywide Uncontrolled Crosswalk Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project, Award Amount:$1,757,000 • City of Huntington Park: 2016 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle II, Uncontrolled Crosswalk SRTS Ped Safety Project,Award Amount:$1,032,000 • City of Cudahy: 2015 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle II,Wilcox Avenue Complete Streets and SRTS Project,Award Amount:$1,344,000 • City of Cudahy: 2015 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Cudahy City Wide Complete Streets Improvement Project,Award Amount:$2,134,449 • City of Cudahy:2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP)Cycle 7,Salt Lake Ave Safety Project,Award Amount:$363,180 • City of Cudahy: 2016 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle III, Atlantic Ave Bicycle and Ped Enhancement Project,Award Amount:$1,784,000 • City of Pico Rivera: 2016 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP)Cycle 8, Sign Improvements,Award Amount:$696,300 • City of Commerce: 2013 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Commerce Goods Movement Atlantic Blvd:Washington to Como,Award Amount:$631,137 • City of Commerce: 2016-17 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program (Cal Recycle), Award Amount:$281,400 Building and Safety Department(2014-Present) Ms. Vigil also provides support to our Building and Safety Department and assists our Building Official with necessary reports,plan check processing, permit technician tasks, as well as other Building and Safety duties across multiple agencies as part of Transtech's Municipal Services Contract. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.32 CRAIG MELICHER,PE,Project Management,QC/QA Support ,� eMr. Melicher has approximately 35 years of experience. Mr. Melicher has served in various capacities,such as Building Official,City Engineer,and s CIP Manager for various Cities. He has extensive experience in construction, California ~ ",yr% .,, Building Codes, building and safety plan check and inspection, code interpretations,and resolving code related construction and plan check problems on a broad range of ,.. `= u; residential, commercial and public works capital improvement projects. He has a broad 41 '` , knowledge of municipal government operations,including preparation and presentation _ of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public, ° * s various city departments,city council and other governmental agencies. g,` j` Mr. Melicher also served as Principal Program Manager for a wide variety of projects. ,•••• ; Depending on the specific project,Mr.Melicher's services included everything from initial ' ' g` concept to project close-out. As each project faced its own unique challenges, Mr. EDUCATION Melicher was able to employ his extensive public agency background to insure the most • Bachelor of Science in Civil expedition and cost effective solution to each respective challenge, especially where, as Engineering,CalPoly, Program Manager, Mr. Melicher was specifically responsible for acting on behalf of and Pomona insuring the best interests of the project's client. His experience includes serving as • Various Construction Owner's Representative and Construction Manager for large and complex construction Management Classes at projects,such as public works/infrastructure,community center,city hall,library,parking g UCLA,including: structure, movie theaters, retail centers, etc. He has extensive experience in • Legal Aspects of construction,Green Book,Caltrans Standards, Building Codes. Construction Management • Primavera based Mr. Melicher has participated in a wide variety of multi-disciplinary development teams Construction Scheduling responsible for projects that include: Software • Public Works and Infrastructure Improvements • Commercial and Retail Developments REGISTRATION • Transportation and Parking Related Facilities • State of California Registered • Residential and Mixed Use Development Civil Engineer • Industrial Development HIGHLIGHTS • Served as City Engineer and Some of the significant projects managed by Mr. Melicher include: Building Official for 6 Cities. • Riverside County Transportation Commission, Corona Main Street Metrolink • Experience in working with Parking Structure and Pedestrian Bridge. Construction of a 6 level, approximately State Architect's Office. 1,000 space parking structure that included a pedestrian bridge. • Diversified experience in • City of Alhambra Renaissance Plaza Parking Structure and Entertainment Center. both Type A(General Construction of a 5 level,approximately 600 space parking structure,a 10-plex movie Engineering)and Type B theater,several retail/restaurant tenant spaces. (Building) projects. • City of San Bernardino Historic Santa Fe Depot Renovation and Transit Center • Experience in federally funded project Parking Structure. Craig managed the restoration and rehabilitation of the historic San Bernardino Santa Fe Train Depot. The scope included significant hazardous management. materials abatement, seismic and other structural upgrades, office tenant improvements, restaurant improvements, installation of new electrical, HVAC, and plumbing systems,and improvements to the adjacent site. The project later included a 2%2 level parking structure for approximately 350 cars. • TACC Cultural Center Development,Lanham,MD. Construction of a 310,000 square foot development that included five buildings over an underground parking garage, a Turkish Bath that includes a subterranean swimming pool and basketball court; a _ , TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Prof /Management Services TirarvsrEck Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.33 cultural center with auditorium and museum space;a fellowship hall with restaurant; a 16 unit apartment building and a large religious facility. • City of Commerce Rosewood Community Center Closeout. Construction of Transtech was retained by the City to take over the closeout as the project had fallen more than two years behind schedule. Craig assisted the City to complete the closeout and help resolve a multi-million dollar delay claim filed by the contractor against the City. • Alhambra Redevelopment Agency Downtown Revitalization Program. Revitalization program that included multiple improvements to the Fremont Plaza that included significant alteration of existing buildings for lease by Toys-R-Us and Party City,construction of a new 30,000 square foot store for PetSmart,and several other stand-alone retail buildings.Significant additional remodel work was also done on multiple buildings on Main Street for various retail and restaurant uses. Mr. Melicher also provide his expertise in the construction field serving as an expert witnesses for construction claims and defects and has a strong background on the legal aspects of project and construction management, and Mr. Melicher is particularly well versed in California statutes regulating all types of publicly funded construction. Mr. Melicher has a broad knowledge of municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public, various city departments, city council and other governmental agencies. Mr. Melicher also provides training,and establishes procedures for project,construction and program management to local governmental agencies. He lead a team of experts in the preparation of a very extensive Project, Program and Construction Management Procedures Manual for the public agency to assist the department in developing and implementing efficient and state of the art project management practices and procedures to better serve the operational needs of the department,as well as ensuring the delivery of good customer service to its clients. Mr. Melicher also provided his expertise in the construction field serving as an expert witness for construction claims and defects. He has a strong background on the legal aspects of project and construction management and is particularly well versed in California statutes regulating all types of publicly funded construction. tat TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTEC{f Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.34 ALI CAYIR,PE,Program and Project Management Support Mr. Cayir has over 35 years of experience in engineering. He has participated on •is numerous multi-disciplinary teams dealing with the planning and development of civil and traffic engineering, urban and rural development, and public works projects. He ° served as Principal Project Manager for the design, construction and management of a ,' variety of projects, including: P,. ,, • Public Works and Infrastructure Improvements twe: 7,-, • Educational and University Campuses • Institutional .. • Commercial and Retail • Transportation and Parking Facilities • Residential and Master Community Development Mr. Cayir served as contract City Engineer, Traffic Engineer and Interim Public Works EDUCATION Director for many municipalities in Southern California. He has a broad knowledge of • BS Engineering municipal government operations, including preparation and presentation of staff • MBA reports/resolutions to city councils, committees and interaction with public,various city • Project/Construction departments,city council and other governmental agencies. Management, UC Irvine Municipal Engineering Assignments(past and present) REGISTRATION • City of Alhambra-Contract City Engineer/City Traffic Engineer • Registered Civil Engineer • City of Temple City-Contract City Engineer/City Traffic Engineer • Licensed Gen Contractor A • City of Commerce-Interim City Engineer/City Traffic Engineer/PW Director • Licensed Gen Contractor B • City of Hanford-City Traffic Engineer • City of La Habra Heights-City Engineer/City Traffic Engineer HIGHLIGHTS • City of Pomona-Interim City Engineer • 30 years of experience in City • City of Commerce, Interim W Director/City Engineer/Traffic Engineer Engineering. • City of Bellflower, Deputy City Engineer • Served as contract City • City of Cudahy,CIP Manager Engineer and City Traffic • City of San Bernardino,CIP Manager Engineer for many Cities. • City of Huntington Park,City Engineer • City of Alhambra-Contract City Engineer/City Traffic Construction Management Experience Engineer. Mr.Cayir has served as CM,PM,RE for numerous construction projects. He has extensive • City of Hanford-Former City experience in Federally Funded Projects. Mr. Cayir also served as contract City Engineer Traffic Engineer. for many municipalities. Some of the significant projects where Mr. Cayir served as • City of La Habra Heights- CM/PM/RE/Project Principal include: Former City and Traffic . Washington Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction Project(Federally Funded),City Engineer of Commerce ($30m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office • City of Pomona-Former Engineer Services. The project includes widening and reconstruction of 2.7 miles of Interim City Engineer. Roadway (including approx. 3,500 tons rubberized AC overlay). The project is • City of Commerce-Assistant federally funded and being managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Public Services/City PW Procedures Manual. Engineer. • Rosemead Boulevard Improvements Project, City of Tempe City(Federally Funded) • Extensive experience in grant programs. Secured over ($20m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. The project included widening and reconstruction of 2 miles of roadway $20m in funding for during (includingThe project was federally last 2 cycles of MTA Call for approx. 6,000 tons rubberized AC overlay). p Projects Applications. funded and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures • Extensive experience in Manual. working with Caltrans, • Cactus Avenue and Nason Street Improvements and 135'Span Bridge Project,City of _01,4,, , TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No..2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.35 County of Los Angeles and Moreno Valley($21m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer,Inspector,Office other regional agencies and Engineer Services.The funding included State Local Partnership Program(SLPP)grant Utility Companies. and was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance • Extensive experience in Procedures Manual. NPDES requirements. • Rte 71/Mission BI Grade Separation Project (Federally Funded) City of Pomona • Extensive experience in the ($40m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer management and Services. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local administration of federally Assistance Procedures Manual.Caltrans was the oversight/jurisdictional Agency. and state funded projects in • Bogert Trail Bridge Widening Project(Federally Funded),City of Palm Springs($5m). compliance with Caltrans Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. The Local Assistance Procedures project is federally funded and being managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Manual(LAPM). Assistance Procedures Manual. • Served as Resident Engineer on several Federally Funded ' Via Duct Boulevard/2nd St Realignment and Metrolink Parking Facility, City of San Projects. Bernardino ($6m). Provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. • New Avenue,from North to South City Limit Rehabilitation and ADA Improvements Project(Federally Funded),City of Alhambra($2m). Provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. Project was inspected and managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. • City of Commerce,Rosewood Community Center. Transtech was retained by the City to take over the management of this multimillion dollar facility which was 2 years behind schedule. Within 5 months, Transtech brought the construction to substantial completion level allowing the City to start the move-in process, and 2 months after,the facility was opened to public use. Currently,Transtech is assisting the City in claims analysis and change order resolution. Construction Cost:$15m. • City of Alhambra Downtown Revitalization Program: Involved 11 projects,including Renaissance Plaza (multi-plex theater, public plaza with fountain and unique art features, restaurants, retail, 800 space parking structure), Fremont Plaza (modifications/reconstruction of existing buildings for lease by ToysRUs and Party City, construction of a new 30,000 SF store for PetSmart, and various other retail buildings) and Downtown Revitalization (modification/upgrade of existing buildings for Starbucks,4 Restaurants and various retail businesses). (Cost:$80m). • City of Alhambra 4 parking structures: Transtech served as turn-key project manager, including management of design, construction, building plan check and inspection,federal funds,labor compliance for 4 parking structure projects. Chapel: 4 stories,300 space structure; First Street:4 stories,276 space structure;Garfield:5 stories, 800 space structure. Cost $15m; North First Street Mosaic: 5 stories, 320 space structure,Cost$6m. Civil Engineering Experience • University Park Development/San Bernardino: The project included 2 miles of new roadway, sewer, water, utility and extensive hill side grading for a master planned residential and commercial development on 130-acre site across from the San Bernardino State University. Cost$40m. • City of Torrance,Crenshaw Reconstruction,Skypark Improvements, 190th/Crenshaw Widening: Design, construction management services, including inspection, surveying, resident engineer, federal compliance, labor compliance. Project was funded by Federal Funds and was managed and inspected in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Cost:$5 m. • Valley Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction project which is funded by State and TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Sarvicas TRANSiECh Related to SR-T10 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.36 Federal funds and required complete project and environmental report, including Right-of-Way, Relocation, SHPO, NEPA, SEQA, Noise, Parking, Economic, Hazardous Materials technical studies, and processed through Caltrans and FHWA. Construction cost($6m). • Carlsbad to San Diego Rail Trail Project Report,which is funded by State and Federal funds and required complete project and environmental report, including Right-of- Way,Relocation,SHPO, NEPA,SEQA,Noise,Parking, Economic, Hazardous Materials technical studies,and processed through Caltrans and FHWA. • Alameda Corridor Agency East (ACE) Rail Grade Crossing Improvement Project encompassing 6 agencies and 14 locations in Los Angeles County. Work involved roadway realignment and reconstruction, signalization, traffic control, and construction phasing as well as related improvements such as storm drain, water, sewer landscaping, underground utilities,etc. Cost$5,000,000. Traffic Engineering Experience • Project Manager for the preparation of traffic signal modifications and installation, interconnect and radio corrected time base system installation plans and estimates in conjunction with traffic signal synchronization projects for various arterials in Los Angeles County including Garvey Avenue, El Segundo Boulevard, Crenshaw Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, Rosecrans Avenue, Arrow Highway and Huntington Drive/Alosta Avenue/Foothill Boulevard. Signal modification improvements included equipment upgrades, signal phasing upgrades and installation of radio correct time base units(WWV)for signal coordination as well as physical intersection improvements. • Project Manager for the preparation of signal timing and coordination plans for multiple locations on major arterials in Los Angeles County including Main Street, Garvey Avenue, Crenshaw Boulevard and Slauson Avenue utilizing state-of-the-art computer software. • Project Traffic Engineer for the proposed Materials Recovery Facility in the City of Industry.This project involved the preparation of a comprehensive area wide traffic impact study to identify the potential impacts associated with development of a proposed Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) in the City of Industry. The study area encompassed 32 intersections and several freeways such as SR 60 and SR 57. The study also included an evaluation of cumulative impacts associated with 22 planned projects located within the sphere of influence of the study area. In addition, separate analyses were conducted to determine the potential impacts of developing the MRF at alternative sites. i / s TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRA TEch Related to SR-T10 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.37 OKAN DEMIRCI,PE,QSD,QSP,MBA,Program and Project Management Support Mr. Demirci has approximately 10 years of experience. Mr. Demirci serves as Assistant Public Works Director, Assistant City Engineer, CIP Program Manager at Transtech's Contract Cities and provides technical and management support. Mr. Demirci completed Caltrans Resident Engineer Academy, very familiar with the chi4management and administration of federally and state funded projects in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Mr. Demirci works as Project Manager on various projects (including federal and state 400 funded projects)from project inception to closeout. Examples of his project experience includes: City of South El Monte, Assistant City Engineer/CIP Program Manager/Resident Engineer(Transtech serves as Contract City Engineer): Mr. Demirci coordinated Capital EDUCATION Improvement Projects(CIP)program at the City.As part of his responsibility,Mr.Demirci • MBA, Brandeis University, prepared PS&E packages, coordinated bid advertisement, bid opening, bid analysis, Massachusetts contract award, pre-construction meetings, provided construction management as • BS, Engineering,Sabanci resident engineer, coordinated project close out, and state/federal projects grant University,Turkey closeout activities. Mr. Demirci also coordinated professional services procurement by preparing RFPs and oversees various consultants on City's CIP program. Highlighted HIGHLIGHTS projects are: • Registered Civil Engineer • HSIP Cycle 6 & 7 Program: Managed 5 separate Traffic Signal, Lighting and • Qualified Stormwater Street Improvements Federally funded HSIP projects through all phases Designer and Practitioner including federal grant management, design phase coordination, construction (QSD/QSP) phase coordination, project closeout,federal grant closeout.Cost$2.7m • Serves as CIP Program • Federal CDBG Program:Managed City's FY 17/18,18/19 CDBG projects through Manager,Assistant Public all phases including federal grant management, design phase coordination, Works Director and Assistant construction phase coordination, project closeout,federal grant closeout.Cost City Engineer at Transtech's $1.5m Contract Cities. City of Chino,CIP Project Manager/Resident Engineer: Mr.Demirci worked as City's CIP • Completed Caltrans Resident manager.As part of his responsibility,Mr.Demirci prepared PS&E packages,coordinated Engineer Academy,very bid advertisement,bid opening,bid analysis,contract award,pre-construction meetings, familiar with the provided construction management as resident engineer,coordinated project close out, management and and state/federal projects grant closeout activities. Mr. Demirci also coordinated administration of federally professional services procurement by preparing RFPs and oversees various consultants funded projects in on City's CIP program. Highlighted projects are: compliance with Caltrans • Citywide Alley Paving Improvements, Federally Funded (CDBG): Asphalt Local Assistance Procedures pavement, various concrete improvements (sidewalk, driveway, curb ramp, Manual (LAPM). sidewalk,etc.). Cost:$0.5m • Strong knowledge of MS • El Prado Rd Reconstruction Project: Asphalt full depth reclamation (FDR), Project, Primavera,AutoCAD concrete improvements(sidewalk,curb ramp,curb&gutter,etc.),traffic signal, signing and striping.Cost:$3.0m City of Monterey Park,CIP Project Manager/Resident Engineer: Mr.Demirci worked as City's CIP manager.As part of his responsibility, Mr. Demirci prepared PS&E packages, coordinated bid advertisement, bid opening, bid analysis, contract award, pre- construction meetings, provided construction management as resident engineer, coordinated project close out, and state/federal projects grant closeout activities. Mr. Demirci also coordinated professional services procurement by preparing RFPs, and oversees various consultants on City's CIP program. Highlighted projects are: I '; TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.38 • Parks & Rec Master Plan Development and Construction of Improvements at 13 parks(including picnic shelters,playgrounds,irrigation systems installations and ADA improvements).Cost$1.5m • Citywide Parking Lot Reconstruction and Various City Facility Restoration/Maintenance(including Cascades Waterfall Restoration, City Pool Maintenance,Various other City facility maintenance).Cost$2.5m City of Temple City,CIP Program Manager/Assistant City Engineer(Transtech serves as Contract City Engineer): Mr. Demirci worked as City's CIP manager. As part of his responsibility,Mr.Demirci prepared PS&E packages,coordinated bid advertisement,bid opening,bid analysis,contract award,pre-construction meetings,provided construction management as resident engineer, coordinated project close out, and state/federal projects grant closeout activities. Mr. Demirci also coordinated professional services procurement by preparing RFPs and oversees various consultants on City's CIP program. Highlighted projects are: • City's Annual Pavement Management Program: Prepared and managed City's PMP since 2013. He coordinated in preparation of bid packages following recommendations from PMP and managed projects in PE and CE phases. Annual cost:$1.5m • Pedestrian and Bike Safety Improvements on Temple City Blvd, El Monte and Various Locations Citywide (HSIP Federally Funded): Worked as project manager in PE and CE phases of federally funded projects.These projects were managed in compliance with applicable federal requirements.Cost:$1.5m • Council Chambers Renovation and ADA Improvements Project: Served as Project manager, the improvements included complete reconstruction/renovation of the Council Chambers with new seating, dais, carpet, lighting, AV system, and new ADA compliant bathrooms, new ADA compliant access to the building.Cost$0.5m. • Rosemead Safety and Enhancement and ADA Improvements Project: Served as the Office Engineer for the Rosemead Safety and Enhancement Project. The project included widening and reconstruction of 2 miles of Rosemead Boulevard, including new medians, bike lanes,signals,sidewalks,curb&gutter, street lighting, landscape, street scape. The project is federally funded and is managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Cost$20m. City of Cudahy, CIP Manager/Coordinator: Mr. Demirci served as CIP Program Manager/Coordinator. As part of his responsibility, Mr. Demirci prepared PS&E packages,coordinated bid advertisement,bid opening,bid analysis,contract award,pre- construction meetings,construction phase coordination,post construction project close out,and state/federal projects grant closeout activities. Highlighted projects are: • Pedestrian Safety Improvements,(ATP Funded):Served as Project Manager for this federally funded$1.Om project.Project includes construction of pedestrian safety improvements such as curb extensions, installation of traffic devices, signs,striping. • Lugo Park, Soccer Field Project (CDBG Federally Funded): Served as Project Manager for this$1.6m federally funded project. Project includes construction of a regulation new soccer field with artificial turf on existing baseball field, DG walking path, landscaping, parking lot expansion, concrete plaza, lighting, drainage, bathroom and concession stand ADA improvements. The project is CDBG federally funded and being managed in compliance with applicable CDBG requirements.Cost$1.6m City of Commerce, CIP Manager/Coordinator: Mr. Demirci served as CIP Program Manager/Coordinator. As part of his responsibility, Mr. Demirci prepared PS&E 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111, .de" MEM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11 Project Mana Management Services ! 9 TRANSIFCH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes 2.39 packages,coordinates bid advertisement,bid opening,bid analysis,contract award,pre- construction meetings,construction phase coordination,post construction project close out,and state/federal projects grant closeout activities. Highlighted projects are: • Slauson Avenue ADA Improvements and Tree Replacement Project: Served as Project Manager for this $1.2m ADA Improvements and tree replacement project. • City's Annual Pavement Management Program: Managed City's PMP since 2015. He coordinated in preparation of bid packages following recommendations from PMP and managed projects in PE and CE phases. Annual cost:$4.5m • Washington Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction Project (Federally Funded), City of Commerce ($30m). Transtech provided CM/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. The project includes widening and reconstruction of 2.7 miles of Roadway (including approx. 3,500 tons rubberized AC overlay).The project is federally funded and being managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Qim) 40'' moo TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTECH --- Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications IRA NSTECII Est. 1989 3. Company Qualifications 3.1 ter_ a GENERAL COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS Company Profile: Established in 1989,Transtech (a California Corporation) is a multi-disciplinary engineering consulting firm.Transtech has been in business 31 years. Transtech is currently providing similar municipal services to approximately 50 agencies. Service Capabilities: Transtech is a multi-disciplinary municipal engineering consulting firm. Our service capabilities include: • Building&Safety Services, Building Inspection, Plan Check, • City Engineer,City Traffic Engineer, Development Building Evaluations,City Building Official,Code Review, Public Works Engineering, Plan Check, Enforcement Inspection • Civil Engineering, Freeways and Interchanges, Local • Labor Compliance Streets and Roads,Sewerage,Water and Storm Drain, • Planning Support Pavement Management System,Grading Studies • Traffic and Transportation Planning and • Staff Augmentation Engineering • CIP Program Management • Water Resources Engineering • Construction Management and Inspection • Surveying, Mapping,ALTA, Right-of-way • Federally Funded Project Management Engineering • Grant Writing • Emergency and Disaster Response,Support and • CDBG Project Management Recovery Services Transtech is currently providing similar municipal services to approximately 50 agencies: Transtech Engineers , Inc . Proudly Services Municipal Engineering&Public Works Consulting - Civil Engineering I Design . Grant Writing I Funds Management • Surveying Building&Safety I Plan Check&Inspection . Engineering Plan Check I Public Works , Planning . Land&Real Estate Development Construction Management I Project&Program Inspection , Mapping&Right-of-Way Engineering - Community Outreach I Public Management , Traffic&Transportation Engineering Relations *Bear Valley CSD *Lancaster *Sand Omits *San Fernando �� Big Be.,take7rl°" I *Burbank iaosd *Pasadena *San Manuel Reservation *Glendale {{ *San Manuel Casino South Pasadena* *SanMannn t dteAzuu Claremont* *Rannho Cucamonga *Rialto LA County*Alhambra* *Tempe City *San Bernardino *El Monte *Coina *Fontana Monterey Park* *Rosemead *Westcovina *South El Monte *Pomona *Onrano *Culver City® *Chino *County of Riverside Maywood**Commerce *Whittier Ball* El *UTC/Riverside Cudahy* Lynwood* *Downey *Moreno valley *Beaumont *Norwalk Manhattan Beach* *Placentia Patin Desert* Hermosa Beach* *Hawaiian Gardens Mim TRANSTEC{I *Hemet Est.1989 Seal Beach* *SerruMe Transferh Engineers,Inc. Transtech.cog ^ *Menifee m395.2.9sl,u1Ig 85 ISO 9001 Cervt.d Iso 9Wl Certified ata Mau Better Business NAM Accredited M Rating *San Clemente ENI wiii kri-1 �� TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSI-Ch Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.2 City of Temple City City of Alhambra ✓ Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Review, ✓ Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Inspection, Permit Technician Review, Inspection, Permit Technician ✓ City Engineering Services: City Eng, Traffic Eng, Design, CIP ✓ City Engineering Services:City Eng,Traffic Eng,Design, and Construction Management, PW lnsp, Fed Proj CIP and Construction Management, PW lnsp, Fed Proj Management Management City of Commerce City of South El Monte ✓ Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Review, V Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Inspection, Permit Tech Review, As-needed Inspection, As-Needed Permit ✓ City Engineering Services: City Eng, Traffic Eng, Design, CIP Technician and Construction Management, PW Insp, Fed Proj V City Engineering Services:City Eng,Traffic Eng,Design, Management CIP and Construction Management, PW lnsp, Fed Proj City of Cudahy Management ✓ Building&Safety Services: Plan Review Services City of West Covina ✓ Engineering Services: Traffic Eng, Design, CIP and V Engineering Services: City Eng,Traffic Eng, Design, CIP Construction Management, PW lnsp, Fed Funded Proj and Construction Management, PW PC, Fed Proj Management Management City of South Pasadena V Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan ✓ Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Review, Review, Inspection, Permit Technician Inspection, Permit Tech City of Rosemead City of Seal Beach V City Engineering Services: City Engineering, Traffic ✓ Building&Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Review,As- Engineering, Design, Construction Management, CIP needed Inspection Management, PW Inspection, Plan Check, Fed Proj City of Azusa Management ✓ Building&Safety Services: Building Plan Review,As-needed City of Big Bear Lake Insp V Building&Safety Services: Building Plan Review City of San Fernando ✓ City Engineering Services:City Eng,Traffic Eng,Design, ✓ Building Inspection Services. CIP and Construction Management, PW PC/Insp, Fed ✓ On-call Services: Engineering Services Proj Management San Manuel Indian Reservation City of Bell ✓ Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Review, V Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Inspection Review, Inspection, Permit Technician San Manuel Casino City of Hawaiian Gardens ✓ Building & Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Review, V Building and Safety Services: Building Official, Plan Inspection Review, Inspection, Permit Technician City of Maywood City of Downey ✓ City Engineering Services: City Eng, Traffic Eng, Design, CIP ✓ Building&Safety Services: Plan Review, Inspection and Construction Management, PW Insp, Fed Proj UTC Corporation/City of Riverside Management V Building & Safety Services: Plan Review, Inspection, City of Placentia and Support ✓ Development/Public Works Plan Check: City of Monterey Park Development/Public Works Plan Check V Building & Safety Services for PW Projects: Building City of San Clemente plan check and inspection services on City CIP Building ✓ On-call Services: Development/Public Works Plan Check projects City of Chino V Engineering Services: Engineering Support, Traffic ✓ CIP Management Services: Transtech is City's Contract CIP Engineering,CIP Management, PW Plan Check Manager for major Public Works Projects. City of El Monte City of Ontario ✓ On-call Services: Engineering Support, Traffic ✓ CIP Management Services: Transtech is City's Contract CIP Engineering, Construction Management, PW Plan Manager for major Public Works Projects. Check mewaseaordra .0/ mom TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTECIi Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications 3.3 County of Riverside County of Los Angeles ✓ Building&Safety Services: Plan Review, Inspection V Building&Safety Services:Plan Review, Inspection City of Lynwood City of San Marino ✓ On-call Services: Engineering,Construction Management ✓ City Traffic Engineering Services: City Traffic City of Beaumont Engineering ✓ Engineering Services: Engineering Support Staff City of Rancho Cucamonga Augmentation V On-call Services: Development/Public Works Plan City of Rialto Check ✓ On-call Services: Construction Management and Inspection City of Hermosa Beach Services. V Plan Check Services: Dev Plan Check City of Irwindale City of Banning ✓ On-call Services: Construction Management and Inspection V Public Works Plan Check: PW Plan Check Services. City of Hemet City of Menifee V On-call Building & Safety Services: Plan Review, ✓ On-call Services: Engineering Services Inspection City of Culver City Riverside County Economic Development Agency ✓ On-call Engineering Services: Eng Services V On-call Services: Eng, Building Evaluations, & City of Fontana Surveying ✓ On-call Services:Eng and Construction Management Services City of Moreno Valley City of Santa Ana V On-call Engineering Services: Engineering Services ✓ On-call Services: Eng and Tech Support Services City of Santa Clarita City of Covina V Staff Augmentation Services: Staff Augmentation ✓ On-call Services:Eng and Construction Management Services Services City of Pasadena San Bernardino County Housing Authority ✓ On-call Engineering Services: Engineering Services V On-call Services: As-Needed Eng, Building & Safety Bear Valley Community Services District Support ✓ District Engineering Services: Engineering, Capital City of Norwalk Improvement Project Management Services ✓ Capital Improvement Project Management Support City of Lancaster Services:As-Needed CIP Management Support. ✓ Traffic Engineering Services:On-call City Traffic Engineering V Building&Safety Services: Plan Review City of Palm Desert City of Anaheim ✓ City Traffic Engineering Services:City Traffic Engineering V Engineering Services: Engineering Services Unique Qualifications: One of the unique qualifications of Transtech is that we serve a number of public agencies as municipal contract service providers. We serve as Contract City Engineer, City Traffic Engineer, CIP Manager, PW Director, Building Official, Building Inspector, Plans Examiner/Plan Checker, Permit Technician, Public Works Inspector, Construction Manager, Construction Inspector, Designer, Federally Funded Project Manager and in other capacities for a number of public agencies. • We have extensive Experience in working with LACMTA (METRO), CALTRANS and LOS ANGELES COUNTY that will be involved in the review, permitting and approval of these projects. • Our team includes experienced staff members who have worked for and/or with LACMTA(METRO),CALTRANS and LOS ANGELES COUNTY,and are intimately familiar with the standards and procedures,project development and approval process,staff and funding requirements of these agencies. • We have extensive experience in the local area, project requirements and processes, and working as an extension of City staff and providing services in similar capacities with minimal direction from City staff. • We have extensive experience in with LACMTA(METRO)710 North MIPs,and Measure R Funding Program and Requirements. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.4 Licenses and Certificates in Diversified Fields: • Professional Licensed Engineer(PE) • ICC Certified Residential Building, Electrical, Mechanical • Professional Licensed Traffic Engineer(TE) & Plumbing Inspector • Professional Licensed Land Surveyor(PLS) • ICC Certified Combination Inspector • Professional Transportation Planner(PTP) • ICC Certified Fire Plans Examiner • Licensed General Contractor A and B • ICC Certified Permit Technician • Qualified Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Developer • ICC Certified CalGreen-California Green Building Plan (QSD) Examiner • Qualified Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Practitioner • ICC Certified CalGreen-California Green Building (QSP) Inspector • General Permit Qualified Industrial Stormwater Practitioner • ICC Certified CA Residential Mechanical Inspector (QISP)ICC Certified Building Official • ICC Certified Plumbing Inspector UPC ICC Certified CA • ICC Certified Building Code Official Commercial and Res Plumbing Inspector • ICC Certified Sustainability Professional • ICC Certified Accessibility Plans Examiner • ICC Certified Building, Electrical, Mechanical& Plumbing • ICC Certified Accessibility Inspector Electrical Plans Examiner • CASp,California Access Specialist • ICC Certified Commercial Building, Electrical, Mechanical& • IAPMO Certified CA Residential Mechanical Inspector Plumbing Inspector EXAMPLES OF PROJECTS REPRESENTATIVE OF TRANSTECH'S DIVERSIFIED EXPERIENCE Project, Program, Construction Management (Partial List): Washington Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction Project ($40M): Transtech provided CM/CI/Resident Engineer, Inspector, Office Engineer Services. The project included widening and reconstruction of 2.7 • miles of Roadway, Traffic Signals, Street Lighting, Landscape, Improvements at I-5 and at 710 Freeways 3 b ; iw� ramps. The project was federally funded and was -» managed in compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance — — ■ _ t. .( sF Procedures Manual. The project was also a Caltrans 1 '._ ti. 40' 4 ( Oversight Project. AWARD: This project was recognized as one of the projects of the year as part of the 2017 American Public Works Association(APWA) BEST Award,in the category of Transportation Projects. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECIS Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.5 :+, "' :� . " �' Rosemead Boulevard Improvements Project ($21M): i irr.;,,'� Located in the City of Temple City, this was a Federally { I4=' s � x " ` j Funded project. Transtech provided construction " ' '' ' f `- '�� management, resident engineer, inspection, labor � = �i ' - compliance and office engineer services. The project • ' ` + included protected bike lanes, widening and j1-1,17,;,40›..":.........; ' _ ` reconstruction of 2 miles of roadway(including approx.4;� Vii, 6,000 tons rubberized AC overlay). it AWARD:The project has achieved numerous awards - �� f1 including a 2013 Planning Excellence in Implementation Award from the American Planning Association, the 2014 Quality of Life Merit Award from the American Society of Landscape Architects, the 2014 Merit Award for Urban Design from the California Council of the AIA and was voted one of the "best 10 new bike lanes of 2014" from the PeopleforBikes organization. Atlantic Boulevard Corridor Improvement Project ($20M):This was a Federally Funded project in the City of Commerce. Transtech provided turnkey services ' included construction management, resident engineer, inspection, office engineer, and funds coordinator.The project was a major street reconstruction and 14v,i, , - beautification project along Atlantic Boulevard which tilir 11 improved mobility for pedestrians, trucks, and vehicles as well as provided corridor beautification with _ — + landscaped medians and other elements. {,;j!)j} AWARD: This project was recognized as one of the II projects of the years as part of the 2020 American Public Works Association(APWA) Project of the Year Award, in the category of Transportation Projects. Cactus Avenue and Nason Street Improvements and 135'Span Bridge Project($21M): This project was part of the State Local Partnership Program SLPP Grant in the City of Moreno Valley ($21M). Transtech provided construction management, resident engineer, 411.11 ' 1inspection,and office engineer services. ,u_.*-4 1,,_!=-_jt'_:•-•— 4 , , _ . .moi ysf AWARD: This project wasrecognizedwith a project si g—�. "I �t achievement award by the Construction •., 1t^�7 1 ►i ' MII Management Association of America (CMAA) for Construction Management Services under the Public I* Works Category for$11M-$50M ranged projects. /jll�� TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications 3.6 ; „. ; i,` Eastern Avenue Rehab Project($1.5M): Located in the _ '' ' .7 mo Commerce,this jct was funded through City's Measure AA Funds. Tp project involved Full Depth Reclaimed of Pavement Rehabilitation.eTranstech prepared i. Citythe PS&E,as well as provided construction management, i -1 resident engineer, inspection, labor compliance and 'i” office engineer services. i ''‘ AWARD: This project was recognized as one of the projects of the year awards as part of the 2017 Outstanding Local Streets and Roads Project Award �. Program in the Category of Roads for Efficient & "' Sustainable Road Maintenance, Construction & Reconstruction Projects. Rte 71/Mission BI Grade Separation Project ($40M): } 4 This project was a Federally Funded project located the "" City of Pomona and included construction of a bridge/grade separation. Transtech provided construction management, resident engineer, inspection, labor compliance and office engineer ' s ,. Jo , services. Caltrans was the oversight/jurisdictional Agency. 26th Street Rehab and Metrolink Station ($1M): This 1 project was Federally Funded in the City of Commerce r. , , and included rehabilitation of 26th Street,and Metrolink I r*i Station parking lot rehab, station platform ;.; "' improvements, landscape and lighting. Transtech '� _ - -- — prepared the PS&E, as well as provided construction management, resident engineer, inspection, labor _ compliance and office engineer services. ! : ATP Citywide Crosswalk and Pedestrian Safety SIImprovement Project ($1.2M): Located in the City of k Cudahy, this project included safe routes to school ' 4a. pedestrian safety improvements near schools and r r t --_• pedestrian activity centers. Transtech prepared the ^e PS&E, as well as provided construction management, i R ` _ �``s-- j resident engineer, inspection, labor compliance and office engineer services. c.... TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020.11, Protect Management ServicesTnaNsTEck Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications 3.7 .' tom'` El Monte, Temple City Blvd, and Various Citywide IFri F , . Locations HSIP Projects ($1.8M): Located in the City of `. Temple City,this project was a Federally Funded through VI ;;. Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP) program. It "' included asphalt roadway resurfacing, markings & n , ': striping, traffic safety improvements such as updated "tf' +_ - •%.7�;'� traffic signal heads and speed radar feedback signs,and i updated street signage.Transtech prepared the PS&E,as ' f t4.1� i ^: well as provided construction management, resident engineer, inspection, labor compliance and office .<.: _ • engineer services. uy —is. ,,• Middleton Street Elementary School Safe Routes to School Improvements Project ($500K): Located in the City of Huntington Park,this project was part of the Safe 18111- 1 --- Route to School program and included pedestrian safety �_ 1 • p °' • ! improvements, bulb outs, ADA compliant PCC curb ramps, sidewalk improvements, updated signage, •. „A, .; ?-- ' P - _- , - *t r'� striping and markings.Transtech prepared the PS&E, as `- -�--� - y"a well as provided construction management, resident - - - - engineer, inspection, labor compliance and office _ _ engineer services. .1 Temple City Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Project r ($900K): Located in the City of Temple City,this project s�'.. �' g included citywide construction of slurry seal to various lli.. f .0 w r streets. Transtech prepared the PS&E, as well as �� _ . provided construction management, resident engineer, inspection, labor compliance and office engineer services. ,.............sig..,..... ..... .7.,i... •-•,,7,-,,,' ' Via Duct Boulevard/2"d St Realignment and Metrolink IF Parking Facility ($6M): This project was Federally —3- �} - Funded and located in the City of San Bernardino. i ! Transtech provided construction management, resident ,.. - , .• , i ,- engineer, inspection, and office engineer services. kflh ( r � w . # • L. %. t ' TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services IRANSrECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications 3.8 - Slauson Avenue ADA Improvements and Tree sReplacement Project ($1.5M): Located in the City of ` +�` Commerce, this project was funded through city's a`.` } Measure AA Funds. The project included removal of 149 . ;; i. `� • overgrown Ficus trees that displaced the sidewalk in .,..' ` 1 some areas up to 2 feet high and replaced them with 1 �ezti .y i new ADA compliant sidewalk and planted 433 drought z U(ry n \ tolerant trees in their place. Transtech prepared the . I. • . ,c- \I PS&E, as well as provided construction management, 1r +,i ,� i • i resident engineer, inspection, labor compliance and r 4t'- office engineer services. 4 t -'= �� =,;. :x -c :f , _, '� % Parking Lot Improvements Projects($550K): Located in y x the City of Temple City,this project included new parking , lot signage, asphalt resurfacing, construction of trellis, ` r- „�.. .. new lighting, electrical vehicle charging station _. """" I. r _ — infrastructure, landscaping, and drainage. Transtech _ - _ .^' provided design, construction management, and - _ ____ — inspection services. "' .'.r "" Bogert Trail Bridge Widening Project($5M): Located in me sr— .`• •,...o,.� �Qa' "? the City of Palm Springs, this project was a Federally �� Jtt�tit,. Funded project. Transtech provided construction ' `' management, resident engineer, inspection, labor . °' "` compliance and office engineer services. The project involved bridge widening, retrofit, and beautification `- elements. - +' ...mai•--- - City of Alhambra Civic Center Library Project ($25M): - Transtech provided plan check, inspection, construction i y� management, and owner representative services, the ow/ r Lim' ••■ t project included construction of a 45,000 SF Library with t' ■ ` an underground parking garage. �� �� ._ .. • TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.9 Mosaic Parking Structure (City Project Project Value: ;:I $6M): Transtech provided design/build program manager, construction manager, full plan review as well • as inspection services of for this development which includes 5 story parking structure.This project is located ,,, i, ' 0 I11 ` in Alhambra. ► 1 •' - '1 1 _40fort_ • Renaissance Plaza ($15M): This project was located in the City of Alhambra and included a parking structure, 10 plex movie theater, retail,and plaza.Transtech served as " ; 1 ,;� 'r.,, the City's Building Official,Plan Checker and Inspector for c c I:l V this project including construction manager of the parking • `' i • 'X , i 2, l_ ; t structure, public plaza,and other improvements. sF i �� ",i Ti r , I 111.3 ii , ( Rosewood Community Center ($25M): Transtech was retained by the City of Commerce to take over the management of this multimillion-dollar facility which was .11K�, ,i..__i-- :v . 2 years behind schedule. Within 5 months, Transtech I__ brought the construction to substantial completion level ' = 1 ;= 1 ° II ■ allowing the City to start the move-in process, and 2 it . . p months after,the facility was opened for public use. t «. L Garfield Avenue Parking Structure ($8.5M):This project " included a 5-story level, 600 space parking structure as rip.. part of the Alhambra Redevelopment Agency and 10 , .� . Downtown Redevelopment. Transtech provided plan check, inspection, construction management and owner C °' AP. representative services. ...4w'ti " ,I I 1 I ter. ..• TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.10 .,,..,,:t- First Street Parking Structure ($3.5M): This project is in A the City of Alhambra and included a 4-story level, 276 I space parking structure. Transtech provided plan check, � inspection, construction management, and owner representative service. Chapel Parking Structure($3M):This project is in the City lir of Alhambra and included a 3-story level, 250 space III parking structure. Transtech provided plan check, . inspection, construction management, and owner representative service. I It Riverside County Transportation Commission, Corona f- Main Street Metrolink Parking Structure and Pedestrian ' r Bridge (25M): This project is in Corona and included 6 i 4 level,approximately 1,000 space parking structure,and a -..R pedestrian bridge over railroad tracks. Transtech '1p`'Pr f1 ,. provided inspection and construction management -,- - := nw----�. services for the construction of this federally funded project. ` City of San Bernardino Santa Fe Depot/Metrolink IN .'' Parking Structure and Historic Santa Fe Depot -. Renovation Project ($25m): This project included The - ,,� Parking Structure involved the construction of a 3-level �° _ It 0 r 'i r vr r,_ �, parking structure for 350 cars. Historic Santa Fe Depot 1= �_ '' _ Renovation involved renovation for adoptive reuse of 60,000 sf historical Santa Fe Train Depot. Transtech provided Transtech provided building code plan check, _ constructability review, building code inspection, construction management, construction inspection, materials testing/inspection, and program management services for these 2 projects,located at the site of Historic Santa Fe Depot area. 4,7 MOM � TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSiEC{I Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications 3.11 City of Commerce City Hall Addition ($8M): This project c..4 • s included construction of 20,000 SF addition to existing the / ( City Hall. Transtech provided construction management . 1111 and inspection services. ii ilili' I. , 1 I Civil Engineering, Master Plans, Feasibility Studies, Facilities Needs Assessment (Partial List): • 2016,2017,2018 Annual City-wide Street Rehabilitation Project,City of Commerce: Prepared Design/PS&E as well as provided construction management and inspection services. • 2015,2016,2017,2018 Annual City-wide Street Rehabilitation Project(Prop C and Measure R Funded),City of Temple City: Prepared Design/PS&E as well as provided construction management and inspection services. • San Elijo Hills Specific Plan: Provided planning, engineering, surveying services for the design and development of the 2,000-acre 3,500 dwelling unit Specific Plan and Master Tentative Map in the City of San Marcos. • Shandin Hills Specific Plan:Provided planning engineering services for the preparation of the Specific Plan and Tentative Map. The project is a proposed 240-acre 1049 dwelling unit community in the City of San Bernardino.Drafted the Specific Plan and prepared the master tentative map. • Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan (including annexation into the City): Approximately 4,000-acre site at the foothills of San Bernardino Mountains,and includes 1,500 to 2,000 residential units, 1,000,000 square feet of commercial and office space, 199-acre/18-hole public golf course,renovation and reuse of the historic Arrowhead Springs Hotel with a new 115 room annex, new 300-room hotel,a conference center, 14-acre corporate office area. • Eagle Bice, Muscupiabe Land Area Infrastructure Master Plan (Devore area in San Bernardino): Drainage, Sewer and Water Master Plan: Approximately 500-acre area for future 1,100-unit master planned community. The project also included a full infrastructure(roadways, storm drain,water,sewer, parks, and utilities) needs and assessment and cost analysis for this future development. • University Development Master Plan (San Bernardino): Approximately 200-acre site in association with the City of San Bernardino,Watson Development and Cal-State SB for the development of 200 residential, mixed use, live-work, retail, office and student housing,educational and training facilities and offices for Cal State SB University. • University of California, Riverside,West Campus Infrastructure: Prepared West Campus Infrastructure Development Design/Study, which identified utility and surface infrastructure requirements, and how these improvements could be phased to accommodate proposed campus growth,for an area of 236.8 acres to support approximately 5 million gross square feet of academic, research,support,and student housing facilities. • City of Monterey Park,City Public Works Yard: Evaluation and Needs Assessment for new Yard. • City of Commerce, Washington Boulevard Overlay Project: Prepared PS&E for the rehabilitation of Washington Boulevard between the 1-5 Freeway and Atlantic Boulevard in the City of Commerce. The project involved coordination with Caltrans and was federally funded and required processing for E-76 through Caltrans Local Assistance. Cost$1M. • City of Baldwin Park,Francisquito Avenue Overlay Project: Prepared PS&E for the rehabilitation of Francisquito Avenue between west and east city limits in the City of Baldwin Park. The project involved coordination with Caltrans and was federally funded and required processing for E-76 through Caltrans Local Assistance. Cost$1.4M. • CSUSB (Cal State SB University) San Bernardino Campus Access Road: Prepared PS&E and provided construction administration for the project. Improvements included approximately 1-mile street,water,landscape,grading,drainage, street lighting and various other improvements. Cost$5M. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-17, ProJ�ct Manag�m�nt S�rvlc�s TRANSTECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications 3.12 • CSUSB (Cal State SB University) Perimeter Road for CSUSB Palm Desert Campus: Prepared PS&E for the project. Improvements included street, water, landscape, grading, drainage, street lighting and various other improvements. Cost$1M. • City of San Bernardino Campus Parkway Roadway Design: Prepared PS&E as well as provided construction management and inspection services for the project. Improvements included street, water, sewer, storm drain, landscape, street lighting,traffic signal,and signing and striping. Cost$6M. • Alameda Corridor Agency East(ACE)Rail Grade Crossing Jumpstart Improvement Project: Prepared PS&E for Federally Funded Jump Start Improvement Package#1-Rail Grade Crossing Improvements for Alameda Corridor Agency East(ACE). Project involved 6 agencies and 14 locations in Los Angeles County. Work involved roadway realignment and reconstruction, signalization, traffic control, and construction phasing as well as related improvements such as storm drain,water,sewer landscaping, underground utilities,etc. Cost$8M. • City of Glendale I-5/Colorado Off-ramp Realignment: Designed the realignment and reconstruction of the I-5/Colorado Off-ramp, including roadway, drainage, signal, striping and traffic control under Caltrans Encroachment permit. Cost: $1m. • City of Torrance Crenshaw and Skypark Reconstruction Projects: Prepared PS&E for Federally Funded reconstruction/rehabilitation of Crenshaw Boulevard and Skypark Avenue(2 separate projects).Transtech also provided construction management services for the project. Cost:$3M. • City of Commerce-Street Rehabilitation Program,Tubeway and Yates Reconstruction/Overlay: Prepared PS&E for 2 projects. The projects involved roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction, storm drain, water and sewer design. Transtech also provided construction management services for the project. Cost:$0.5m. • Riverside County Economic Development Agency:Real Estate Division,Engineering and Construction Services on various housing,real estate and infrastructure projects. • City of San Bernardino,Sewer upgrade project: Preparation of a project PSE for upgrade of main sewer lines at various locations per the City's Sewer Master Plan. Cost:$1.2M • Penasquitos Canyon Trunk Sewer: PS&E for two miles 36-inch gravity sewer including design study reports.City of San Diego. • Ranch Santa Fe Road Sewer Project: Relocation and rehabilitation of 1.5 miles of sewer main. City of San Marcos (by Transtech's VP, David Ragland while employed with another firm). • City of San Bernardino Water Projects: Design and construction management of 3500 feet of 20 to 36-inch ductile iron water transmission main in the City of San Bernardino for the development of University Park.Design of over 10,000 feet of 8 through 12-inch DIP water main for water distribution. Structural arch design for road crossing over the Dept of Water Resources 109-inch Santa Ana pipeline. • City of San Bernardino, Northpark Boulevard Sewer Extension: Half mile gravity sewer main extension for University Park Subdivision in the City of San Bernardino: Project required special structural designs and encroachment permitting for crossing 100'aqueduct right-of-way. • City of San Bernardino,University Park Storm Drain Design:Design of storm drain system with pipes ranging in size from 18 to 60 inches and trapezoidal channel design for 4500 cfs. • City of Riverside Water Projects: Water distribution analysis and computer modeling for University of California Riverside West Campus expansion infrastructure project. • CSUSB (Cal State SB University, Campus Health Center Expansion: Prepared PS&E for the project for grading, utilities and civil engineering. Grants: Our team has proven track record in obtaining outside grants for its client cities. Our staff works with our client cities to find potential funding sources, and to prepare competitive applications for various programs. Just recently, our firm obtained approximately $80m in funding from METRO for 710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects under Round 2 applications, including $9m for Monterey Park, $27m for Rosemead, and $76m for Alhambra. We also obtained approximately $150m under Round 1 projects for our client cities. Additionally, after funds are awarded to a client, our experienced staff provides assistance to ensure compliance with applicable funding program requirements, including MEM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.13 preparing necessary clearance approvals (environmental, utilities, ROW), processing E-76 authorizations, and managing project. ✓ City of Rosemead:2015 Metro(MTA)Call for Projects,Garvey Avenue Regional Access&Capacity Improvement Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$2,316,000 ✓ City of Rosemead: 2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 7, Installation of HAWK Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$241,300 ✓ LRSP (Local Road Safety Plan) Caltrans Grants for 11 agencies totaling $529,000 in awarded funds: The agencies include Rosemead ($48,000), Temple City ($40,000), Commerce ($40,000), San Marino ($40,000), South El Monte ($40,000), West Covina ($84,000), Big Bear Lake ($40,000), Cudahy ($40,000), Monterey Park ($51,000),Alhambra($62,000),and Covina($44,000) ✓ City of Monterey Park: 2018 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 4, Citywide School and Crosswalk Safety Improvements Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$1,367,000 ✓ City of Monterey Park: 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 9, Signal Safety Enhancement Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$540,000 ✓ City of Alhambra: 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 9, Pedestrian Safety Improvements at Signalized Intersections Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$600,000 ✓ City of South El Monte: 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP) Cycle 9, Signal Safety Enhancement Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$876,000 ✓ City of Beaumont:2018-19 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program(Cal Recycle),Awarded Funding Amount:$299,500 ✓ City of Commerce:2018-19 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program(Cal Recycle),Awarded Funding Amount:$348,600 ✓ City of Commerce:2016-17 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program(Cal Recycle),Awarded Funding Amount:$281,400 ✓ City of Huntington Park: 2016 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle II, Uncontrolled Crosswalk SRTS Ped Safety Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$1,032,000 ✓ City of Cudahy:2016 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle III,Atlantic Ave Bicycle and Ped Enhancement Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$1,784,000 ✓ City of San Gabriel:2016 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP)Cycle 8, Install overhead flashing beacon,Awarded Funding Amount:$270,200 ✓ City of Pico Rivera: 2016 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 8, Sign Improvements Project, Award Amount:$696,300 ✓ City of Vernon: 2016 SCAG Sustainability Planning Grants Program,Transit Route Feasibility Study, Awarded Funding Amount:$60,000 ✓ City of Monterey Park:2015 Metro(MTA)Call for Projects,Monterey Pass Road Complete Streets Bike Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$1,994,000 ✓ City of San Gabriel: 2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Cycle 7, Signal Safety Enhancements Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$570,000 ✓ City of Huntington Park:2015 Active Transportation Program(ATP)Cycle III,Citywide Uncontrolled Crosswalk Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$1,757,000 ✓ City of Cudahy: 2015 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle II, Wilcox Avenue Complete Streets and SRTS Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$1,344,000 ✓ City of Cudahy:2015 Metro(MTA)Call for Projects,City Wide Complete Streets Improvement Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$2,134,000 ✓ City of Cudahy:2015 Highway Safety Improvement Project(HSIP)Cycle 7,Salt Lake Ave Safety Project,Awarded Funding Amount:$363,000 ✓ City of Commerce:2015-16 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program(Cal Recycle),Awarded Funding Amount:$204,500 ✓ City of Commerce:2014-15 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program(Cal Recycle),Awarded Funding Amount:$145,200 ✓ City of Alhambra: 2013 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Valley Boulevard Ped Improvement/Walking Viability Project, Awarded Funding Amount:$323,000 ✓ City of Commerce: 2013 Metro (MTA) Call for Projects, Atlantic Blvd: Washington to Como Goods Movement Project, Award Amount:$631,000 ,t�j; s TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.14 Plan Check, Map Check (Partial List): Development, Building and Safety: San Manuel Band of Mission Indians-Building and Safety,Plan , Check, Inspection Services for Casino ri�,. � li t +' ' ,rr : Expansion/Development Project($700M):Transtech serves as ? !111111,' y ' the Building Official, Plan Checker and Inspector for the Tribe. 4ye..7:14,11!111111,16 �i w •.C: Currently we are providing Plan Check and Inspection services for Casino's expansion program, which includes casino "> 4 i .. or renovation, hotel, entertainment center, parking structure, .- v`` ,�`"... . ,.. pedestrian bridges, alignment of entry and exit roads, and ''"'. ..,. *tic ` various other improvements. The Alhambra (Project Value: $57.8M): Located at 88 S i,,; " g Garfield Avenue, 2 S Garfield Avenue, 100 & 150 E Main St. Transtech provided full plan review as well as inspection ?' N.. - . .ia- c -,w services of for this development which includes 260 apartment i.‘ _"'r .' i ,/I ; ,1 • `. ?:4- "' units, 4-story parking garage, 72,000 sq ft 2-story retail . . :� .01r.," 'P4. building, 16,730 sq ft 1-story retail building,and 23,000 sq ft 1 --4"4- .., �s> °� , ;;-, ir ;bk . story retail building. This project is located in Alhambra. -"` Transtech also provided Map Check, and PW Off-site 'ar Improvements PW Plan Check and Inspection. : - The Terraces(Mixed-Use Development(Project Value:$19M): - - , . . ..:, Located at 5935-5953 Temple City Blvd in Temple City. Transtech is currently providing full plan review for the 4 Story -ja , m kl(6 Lit Mixed-Use Development which includes a one level basement i (1 ` ln� garage, 61 condominium units as well as ground level and �� xbasement parking and 7,250 SF of commercial retail 1—U [L LEL E St' bP . ;,11 - • space/restaurant.Transtech also provided Map Check,and PW Off-site Improvements PW Plan Check and Inspection. Temple City Camellia Square(Project Value:$15M):Transtech "4"" ma.. --- —,...- provided full plan review as well as inspectionection services, the ,Y project included a shopping center with an underground garage and 4 total buildings as follows: a one-story 6,600 SF building; IIII ,�^ �'" a two-story 25,700 SF building, a two-story 4,500 SF building; - and, a two-story 43,400 SF building. Transtech also provided i Map Check,and PW Off-site Improvements PW Plan Check and ti: �,: a is .. . • tib' Inspection. t." `, 'rd' 1 .. Linden Walk Residential Development (Project Value: F• f►® ,� 4` r,r/�ti $18.5M): Transtech provided full plan review as well as • ,, v. , 4 C , ;, inspection services for this development which included 74 �` _ Single Family Dwellings.This project is located in Temple City. .1I. ©!it'`i`'" 11,41k LJ `, Transtech also provided Map Check, and PW Off-site Improvements PW Plan Check and Inspection. ate. ta " TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications 3.15 ` Blossom Walk Residential Development (Project Value: I L,i1. ".i. $5.7M): Transtech provided full plan review as well as "i . 111. 4se ,..... - inspection services of for this development which includes 24✓ , d ..a ` • �� ' unit condominiums and 4 single family homes. This project is ' located in Temple City. Transtech also provided Map Check, • 111,I , t, , pip and PW Off-site Improvements PW Plan Check and Inspection. I I i �, Pacific Plaza (Project Value: $30.3M): Located at 11 S 3' St i R I ,, (condo)and 300 W Main St(retail).Transtech provided full plan C �� i II -Lir.' � I '�` tr t review as well as inspection services of for this development �� i ! x �,., �� �, which includes 120 condo units and retail space below. This II `,, . 4___- "1 - project is located in Alhambra. Transtech also provided Map 7 Check, and PW Off-site Improvements PW Plan Check and --14 .* , ' �' a rt - Inspection. Transtech also provided Map Check, and PW Off- - - =-:2ir-- --- site Improvements PW Plan Check and Inspection. Midwick Collection (Project Value: $13M): Located at 2400 S 1 I. • remont Avenue.Transtech provided full plan review as well as _ Cr;, - •inspection services of for this development which includes 36 g ,.....„.,....i.„..„ , _ , - 4•j a single family dwellings and 28 townhomes. This project is •I i 11 LI I . _ I located in Alhambra.Transtech also provided Map Check, and PW Off-site Improvements PW Plan Check and Inspection. - Qom-,, ( ' Casita de Zen (Project Value: $21M): Located at 28 N 3rd St -'�`�1, i g _ y I I (condo)and 235 W Main St(retail).Transtech provided full plan �,i Iireview as well as inspection services of for this development I ' I I II aSliiiirarr_. N► `'';r' which includes mixed use project with 92 condos on top, and , 1,4 1 r E 1- I. retail on bottom.This project is located in Alhambra.Transtech IrLir - •-' also provided Map Check, and PW Off-site Improvements PW J Illi , I i '' -.I Plan Check and Inspection. -r, Alta Med Medical Group (Project Value: $4M): Located at t .,„:I-I1900 E Slauson Ave.Transtech provided full plan review as well rrl 1 Row �.-v as inspection services of for this development which includes a — ` IM 1 I - w new mixed-use building of office space and an adult day care a- '� with new on grade parking.This project is located in Huntington 11.i..iiI.. - Park. Transtech also provided Map Check, and PW Off-site _- Improvements PW Plan Check and Inspection. Main Street Collection (Project Value: $23M): Located at 410 W Main Street. Transtech provided full plan review as well as , ,,, . , rw s inspection services of for this development which includes 4 r�'.� story mixed-use project with 8,200 s ft retail space,52 condos, , .,,,_1/4,n, ,: C ,. . 9 live/work units, 19 townhomes,and 6 shopkeeper units.This Aa ' midi , project is located in Alhambra. Transtech also provided Map Check, and PW Off-site Improvements PW Plan Check and __ - Inspection. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSrECH Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 3. Company Qualifications 3.16 DaVita Alhambra Dialysis Center (Project Value: $2M): Located at 1237 E Main St.Transtech provided full plan review as well as inspection services of for this development which o•_ -- — includes 1-story 14,125 sq ft medical office. This project is located in Alhambra.Transtech also provided Map Check, and PW Off-site Improvements PW Plan Check and Inspection. '" -4.1.-- 820 Mission Development LLC(Project Value:$10M): Located Nom...'°" r ?.- at 820 Mission St.Transtech provided full plan review as well r� Y riot ��.Cr - "" as inspection services of for this development which includes ji, r - construction of new office building with one residential unit IA14, M above, new 15 unit townhome cluster with office fronting ot, �.:� �' Mission Street with one level subterranean parking, convert • � :,,t'`�- existing 3-story industrial building into 9 residential units, construct 13 townhome units.This project is located in South ilk ._Ste, '��� = z Pasadena. V County of Riverside Economic Development Agency, Facility Evaluation: Located at 41888 Motor Car Pkwy Transtech provided Facility Evaluation Services including an accessibility �' ,, compliance review to allow the 297,033 SF 5-story office i yo = ^• -t, building to operate as an essential services facility. , 1_.rr ' i -'---_ Ii-i !!t••• . - '‘ - ___.. __ -._.. County of Riverside Economic Development Agency, Facility �- : � • r � _.0 Evaluation: Located at 450 E. Alessandro Blvd Transtech +.t , provided Facility Evaluation Services comprised of a high-level r " analysis of the structural system and a code compliance ' -'. T :111r °� \ evaluation of the entire 5 Acre property including a 16,826 SF ' I" r �1 / office building, outdoor theater, and several assessor F! `� / structures. X40. :lob, ....ma. Traffic and Transportation Engineering Experience (Partial List): Transtech is currently providing various Traffic and Transportation Engineering contract services to several agencies and serves as contract traffic engineer for a number of municipalities. We advise our client cities on actions needed to comply with County, State, and Federal regulations related to City streets, traffic regulation and traffic management. We provide technical expertise, recommendations, conducted necessary surveys, prepare reports on traffic related issues, and present them at Commission and/or Council Meetings. We prepare traffic safety and calming studies, stop and signal warrants/studies, traffic impact studies, respond to City requests, citizen complaints, and attend Traffic Commission meetings. We review traffic impact studies submitted by developers, provide traffic study guidelines to other consultants preparing TIA's,and represent the City at planning commission and council meetings when these projects are reviewed and presented. We also assess safety for pedestrians, buses and bicycles by reviewing master plans completed for transit and bicycles as well as safe walk to school routes. The following are various traffic engineering projects and studies completed by Transtech: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, ProJact Manag.mant Sorvlcos TRANSTECh Rolatod to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvomonts ProJ.cts 3. Company Qualifications 3.17 FULL TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORTS&PARKING ANALYSIS Client Project Title Brief Summary Private Developers Colton Reche Canyon Gas Station Retail, Prepared Comprehensive Area Wide Traffic Impact Study to Colton Industrial Project,Anaheim Mixed Identify the Potential Impacts Associated with Each Use Project Development. Private Developer Big Bear Galleria in City of Big Bear Full Traffic Impact Analysis For A Commercial And Shopping Site In Big Bear Lake. City of San City General Plan Update Transtech Prepared the Circulation Element And EIR/Traffic Study Bernardino for The City's 2005 General Plan Update. The Proposed Land Use Plan and Its Impacts Were Analyzed. The Study Included Approximately 100 Intersections And 80 Street Segments. Future Traffic Condition Scenarios Were Developed Using State-Of-The- Art Transportation Planning Modeling Software. City of San Juan Master Plan for Downtown Area Determine the Historic Town Center Master Plan's Potential Capistrano Impacts on The City of San Juan Capistrano's Transportation System and To Identify Strategies for Improving the Transportation System's Overall Effectiveness Through A Multimodal Approach. Private Developer Shandin Hills TIA in the City of San Traffic Assessment of Project Impacts of The Proposed Master Bernardino Plan Community Which Is Comprised of Housing,Commercial and Schools. UC Riverside West Campus Development Project Determine Potential Impacts on The Surrounding Circulation System with The Development of An Expanding Campus,Site and Student Enrollment. City of Lawndale City-Wide Parking Study The Study Took A Comprehensive Look at The Parking Supply and Demand Issues That Explain the Parking Deficiencies in The City. The Study Conducted A City-Wide Occupancy Survey of Both On- Site and On-Street Parking and Described Options Developed to Address the Deficiencies. City of Industry Grand Central Material Recovery Facility, Prepared Comprehensive Area Wide Traffic Impact Study to Restaurant Depot,Costco Identify the Potential Impacts Associated with These Developments. City of San Marcos San Elijo Ranch Development EIR/Traffic Prepared An EAR/Traffic Impact Study for A 3,200 Unit San Elijo Study Ranch Development Project. The Study Area Encompassed A 5 Mile Radius from The Center of The Development. City of Torrance City-Wide Safe Route to School Project Evaluated Existing Signage,Striping and Traffic Conditions Around 32 Schools in The City of Torrance. This Included the Preparation of Safe Route to School Maps and Recommendations for Each School. City of Huntington Pedestrian Study Produced This Report as Part of An Effort by The City of Beach Huntington Beach to Evaluate the Impacts of Main Street Two Block and Three Block Street Closures During Weeknight Surf City Events and Weekend Events. Various Cities Cudahy, Carson, Alhambra, Temple City, Preparation of Full PSRE Traffic Project Reports for Various San Gabriel,Huntington Park Funding Applications. This Included Analysis of Existing Condition, Future Conditions, Level of Service,Accident History, And Recommendations. ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE Client Project Title Brief Summary City of Alhambra Garfield Avenue Lane Reduction Review Preparation of Study Assessing the Potential for Reducing the Number of Travel Lanes and Parking Near the City's Business Center to Improve Traffic Flow and Safety. ~� • ', y 31 ' TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRAN5IECA Related to 3R-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.18 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE Client Project Title Brief Summary City of Temple City Daines Street Preparation of A Traffic Analysis to Review Existing Corridor Operations Including an Assessment of Pedestrian Safety Along the Corridor. Presentation of Report and Recommendations to City staff,Traffic Commission and City Council. City of Commerce Various Focused Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation of Several Traffic Studies to Identify and Evaluate the with Emphasis on Safety Traffic Impacts in Particular Safety as A Result of The New Washington Boulevard Street Configuration. City of Commerce Focused Traffic Impact Study and Safety Preparation of A Traffic Study to Identify and Evaluate the Traffic Review Impacts of Modifying the Median Islands in Front of McDonalds And Costco Facilities and Provide Recommendations to Improve Vehicular Safety. City of Inglewood Crenshaw"S"Curve Safety Review A Safety Assessment of Traffic Conditions Along Crenshaw Boulevard Between Manchester Boulevard And 79th Street. The Assessment Was Needed Due to The Horizontal Curve, The High Number of Accidents That Occur Annually Along This Roadway. City of Alhambra Various Streets to Assess the Impacts of As Part of Ongoing Efforts to Improve Safety, Reduce Accident Cut-Through Traffic. One included a Potential and Improve Traffic Conditions on Pine Street Between Multi-Jurisdictional Review with the City Huntington Drive and Atlantic Boulevard,Studies Were Conducted of South Pasadena for the Pine Street Cut- and Recommendations Developed for City Council's Consideration. Through Traffic Assessment Project Went Through City Council, Traffic Commission Review as Well as Included Coordination with City of South Pasadena. City of Alhambra Traffic Calming Studies on Norwood, Elm A Review of Existing Traffic Patterns and Volume Entering and Street, Marguerita Avenue, Garvey Exiting These Streets to Assess the Magnitude of Traffic Currently Avenue, Glendon Way, Shorb Street, Using Residential Streets in Order to Bypass Congestion on Adjacent Front Street,Main Street Major Streets. Information Was Presented to City Staff and Recommendations and Improvements Presented to The Traffic Commission. City of Temple City Traffic Calming Studies on Encinita A Review of Existing Traffic Patterns and Volume Entering and Avenue,Arden Street,Olive Street Exiting These Streets to Assess the Magnitude of Traffic Currently Using Residential Streets in Order to Bypass Congestion on Adjacent Major Streets. Information Was Presented to City Staff and Recommendations and Improvements Presented to The Traffic Commission and City Council. City of Huntington 2012 to 2017 Various Traffic Calming A Review of Existing Traffic Patterns and Volume Entering and Park Corridor Studies. Including studies on Exiting Studied Streets to Assess Vehicle Traffic, Parking Impacts, Pacific Boulevard, State Street, Gage And Pedestrian Safety on These Streets.Information Was Presented Avenue,Florence Avenue to City Staff and Recommendations and Improvements Presented to the Traffic Authority. City of Inglewood North City Traffic Calming Traffic Calming Study for The Residential Area Bordered by Centinela Avenue to The South, La Cienega Blvd To the West, La Brea Avenue to The East and Slauson To the North. Transtech Prepared an Initial Review of The Traffic Patterns and Volume Entering and Exiting the Above-Mentioned Neighborhood. City of Alhambra Mark Keppel High School (School Site Relocation of An Existing School Crosswalk in Front of The Mark Review) Keppel High School and The Relocation of The Crosswalk. This Project Went Through School District and Council Review. City of Alhambra Fremont School and Various Elementary Studies Included a Site Assessment of Current Drop Off and Pick Up Schools in the City(School Site Review) Policies as Well as Review of Existing Signage and Striping. Recommendations for Valet Programs and Updated Signage and Striping. City of Temple City Longden Elementary School (School Site Review of Traffic Volume, Parking Conditions, Existing Circulation Review) Surrounding the School Site.Recommendations Included New Valet Lanes, Turning Prohibitions, Upgraded Signage and Striping. Presentation to Traffic Commission and City Council. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSTECIf Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 3. Company Qualifications 3.19 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE Client Project Title Brief Summary City of Rosemead Francis Elementary School, Rice Tasks Involved an Assessment of Existing Drop Off Procedures and Elementary School, Monterey Vista Traffic and Parking Needs Surrounding Each School, Report School, Willard Elementary School Preparation and Recommendations for Updated Signage, Parking (School Site Review) Areas Valet and Warrants for Additional School Crossing Guards. Presentation of Report and Recommendations to City Staff and School District Personnel. City of Inglewood John Wilder Academy (School Site Comprehensive Review of Drop-Off and Pick-Up Operations and Review) Traffic and Pedestrian Circulation at Wilder Academy. This Project Went Through Council Member,Academy and Council Review. Pomona Unified School Site Assessments and Traffic Cortez Elementary School, Montvue Elementary, Rio Rancho School District Circulation for(5)school sites(School Site Elementary,Philadelphia Elementary,Dudley Elementary. Review) Whittier School School Site and Traffic Circulation Benton Middle School District Assessment(School Site Review) City of Huntington School Site Review & Assessment of Nimitz Middle School, Hope Elementary School, San Antonio Park Crosswalks, Crossing Guards, & Signage Elementary,South Region Elementary School (School Site Review) Various Cities Various Focused Reports Prepared for Prepared Traffic Review with Existing Conditions Analysis, Public Works or Traffic Dept. Observations,Counts for The Preparation of Various Warrants Using (Preparation of Warrants for All-Way CAMUTCD and CVC.Went to PW and Traffic Commission. Stop, Traffic Signals, Beacons and Pedestrian Devices) Various Cities Preparation of CMP Data(Preparation of Information Included Peak Hour Count, LOS Analysis and Letter Data Required for CMP Submittal) Report. Various Cities Citywide Engineering and Speed Surveys Prepared the City-Wide Engineering and Speed Surveys. Transtech (Preparation of City-Wide Engineering Staff Is Radar Certified with The Rio Hondo College Justice Center. and Speed Survey) City of Alhambra Main Street Master Plan, Lowes, Preparation of Traffic Scope, Meetings with Consultants as Kensington Mixed Use, BMW Expansion, Representative of The City, Review of The Traffic Studies, Medical Office, Commonwealth Plaza, Recommendations and EIR's Prepared for Each Proposed Nissan Expansion, Pacific Square Retail, Development Project. Represent the City at Planning and Council Alhambra Campus(Peer Review of Traffic Presentations of Larger Projects. Studies Prepared by Outside Consultants Submitted to Client Cities) City of Alhambra Review of Development Projects in Surrounding Cities that May Affect Alhambra(Hotel Projects from MP)(Peer Review of Traffic Studies Prepared by Outside Consultants Submitted to Client Cities) City of Temple City The Terraces,Camelia Square,Mixed Use Project(Peer Review of Traffic Studies Prepared by Outside Consultants Submitted to Client Cities) City of Inglewood Hollywood Park(Peer Review of Traffic Studies Prepared by Outside Consultants Submitted to Client Cities) UC Riverside 2nd Phase of West Side Campus(Peer Review of Traffic Studies Prepared by Outside Consultants Submitted to Client Cities) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSI-EC(f Related to 3R-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 4. References TRANSTECh Est. 1989 4. References 4.1 Client Name:City of Monterey Park(Year started and completed: 2013—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: Engineering, Traffic Engineering, CIP Management, Design, Construction Management, Inspection, Federally Funded Project Management, Building Official, As-needed Plan Review, Inspection, Permit Technician • Contact: Ron Bow, City Manager, 626-307-1255; E: rbow@monterevpark.ca.gov Client Name:City of South El Monte (Year started and completed: 2018—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: Building and Safety Plan Check, Inspection, as needed Permit Technician, Public Works Plan Checks, City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, CIP Design, Construction Management, Inspection, Federally Funded Project Management • Contact: Rene Salas,Assistant City Manager;T: 626-579-6540, Ext. 3040; E: rsalas@soelmonte.org Client Name:City of West Covina (Year started and completed: 2019—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Map/Plan Check and Inspection, CIP Management, Design, Construction Management, Inspection, Federally Funded Project Management • Contact: Mark Persico,Assistant City Manager;T: 626-939-8456; E: MPersico@westcovina.org Client Name:City of Temple City (Year started and completed: 2012—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: Building Official, Building and Safety Plan Check, as needed Inspection and Permit Technician, Public Works Plan Checks, City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, CIP Design, Construction Management, Inspection, Federally Funded Project Management • Contact: Bryan Cook, City Manager;T: 626-285-2171; E: bcook@templecitv.us Client Name:City of Commerce(Year started and completed: 2003—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: Building Official, Building and Safety Plan Check, Inspection,as needed Permit Technician, Public Works Plan Checks, City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, CIP Design, Construction Management, Inspection, Federally Funded Project Management • Contacts:Jose Jimenez, Development Services Director;T: 323-722-4805; E: iiinnenez@ci.commerce.ca.us Client Name:City of Alhambra (Year started and completed: 1993—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: Building Official, Building and Safety Plan Check, Inspection, Permit Technician, Public Works and Development Map/Plan Check and Inspection, City Engineer,Traffic Engineer • Contact: Marc Castagnola, Dev Services Director,T: 626-570-5041; E: mcastagnola@cityofalhambra.org Client Name:City of San Marino (Year started and completed: 2018—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: City Traffic Engineer • Contact: Michael Throne, PW Director, 626-300-0787; E: MThrone@CityofSanMarino.org Client Name:City of Ontario (Year started and completed: 2019—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: Management of CIP and Staff Augmentation Services • Contact:Tito Haes, Public Works Director,T:909-365-2625; E:THaes@ontarioca.gov Client Name:City of Chino (Year started and completed: 2018—Ongoing Service) • Services Provided: Management of CIP and Staff Augmentation Services • Contact:Amer Jakher, PE, Public Works Director,T: 909-334-3265; E:AJakher@citvofchino.org The following are Client Reference Letters: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services T,Arosn=ch Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 4. References 4.2 MairFR Fy CITY OF MONTEREY PARK 3:" 320 West Newmark Avenue•Monterey Park•California 91754-2896 Q . x City Council www.monterevaark.ca.pov CID Peter Chan c44rpRN�P Hans Liang Henry Lo Fred Somoso Yvonne Yiu City Clerk Vincent D.Chang City Treasurer Joseph Leon November 19, 2020 To Whom It May Concern: It is with great pleasure that I could have the opportunity to recommend Transtech Engineers, Inc. Transtech has been serving the City of Monterey Park since 2012. They currently provide both Engineering Support and Building and Safety Services in the form of City Engineering, Traffic Engineering, Public Works Plan Check, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Management, Grant Writing/Management, and as-needed Professional Services inclusive of planning, design, project management,construction management,and inspection.Transtech is serving as the Building Official, providing Building Inspection and Building Plan Check/Review. Transtech is always responsive to the City's needs, providing high-quality services promptly. Their staff is professional and courteous and work very well with City staff. Transtech has been incredibly helpful in expediting the City's CIP projects, including numerous parks Master Plan and ADA projects. Their leadership and continued service commitment to the City through the current pandemic has allowed the City to continue providing their engineering and building and safety services. Transtech has consistently achieved positive results with the City of Monterey Park; thus, I am very confident in recommending their professional services. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at(626)307-1255 or at rbow(a-monterevpark.ca.gov. Sincerely, on Bow City Manager Pride in the Past • Faith in the Future TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management SorvlcosTRANSTECh - Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 4. References 4.3 hitting EL ?� �� �j CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE All-America City 1 ) 1415 N.SANTA ANITA AVENUE SOUTH EL MONTE,CALIFORNIA 91733 e� (626)579-6540* FAX(626)579-2107 November 18,2020 Subject:Transtech Engineers,Inc.Reference Letter To Whom It May Concern: It is my pleasure to write this letter of recommendation for Transtech Engineers,Inc.who currently provides both full-service City Engineering and Building and Safety Services for the City of South El Monte. They serve in the capacity of City Engineer, City Traffic Engineer, Public Works Engineering, CIP Management,Construction Management,Grant Management,and as-needed Professional Services inclusive of planning, design, project management, construction management, and inspection as well as the City's Building Official,Permit Technician,Building Inspector,and Building Plan Check/Review.They have been successful in securing funding for the City through the Highway Safety Improvement Program as well as managing federal funding projects in the City. Their staff have provided excellent quality of services to the City of South El Monte,with a high attention to detail and customer service. Based on mine and other staff's professional experience with Transtech and their staff,we are very satisfied with their services. Their leadership and continued service commitment to the City through the current pandemic has been exemplary and has allowed the City to continue to offer building related and engineering related services. Transtech provides the high-quality professional staff and work.Transtech team is professional,efficient, and cost effective, while having the best interest of the City in their mind. I can confidently recommend them for their services. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Rene Salas Deputy City Manager (626)579-6540 ext.3040 rsalas@soelmonte.org ot,.i►�• TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSrECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 4. References 4.4 tfrit City Manager'. Office January 6,2021 Subject: Transtech Engineers,Inc. I have worked with Transtech Engineers, Inc.over the past 20 years of my public service career while serving in several agencies as Director and now as the Assistant City Manager in the City of West Covina.The City is very satisfied with their service.Currently Transtech serves the City of West Covina as both the City's Contract City and Traffic Engineer as well as provides full Building and Safety Services to the City.They serve in the capacity of City Engineer,City Traffic Engineer, Public Works Engineering,CIP Management,Project and Construction Management,Grant Management,Building Official, Plans Examiner,Building Inspector,and Permit Technician as well as-needed providing Professional Services inclusive of planning, design, project management,construction management,and inspection.Some of my experiences with them are in the City of Temple City during my time there as the Community Development Director where they served as the City Engineer and Chief Building Official providing similar services as they do in West Covina as well as in City of San Bernardino during my time as Community Development Director for the City. In all the capacities I have worked with the team,Transtech staff has always been professional,responsive and flexible in meeting all of the City's needs.Transtech provides high quality work;their staff is professional and courteous;their work is efficient and cost effective.They have extensive project and construction management,public works,engineering,funds management, and building and safety knowledge and experience. They are known to deliver complex projects successfully.The firm has proven themselves to be a great asset to the City and a reliable partner in getting projects completed. In Temple City,Transtech Engineers also served as the resident engineer on the award winning$21 million Rosemead Boulevard project.Their skills and professionalism were vital in delivering the project on time and on budget. During this challenging time and through the pandemic the Transtech team has continued to provide exceptional services to the City in delivering projects to the community.Their efforts during COVID-19 in West Covina was highlighted in the American Public Works Association(APWA)INSIGHT Magazine for their virtual community engagement approach during the pandemic for two of the City's Public Works projects.Their leadership and continued service commitment to the City during this time has been exceptional and we are glad to have them as our partner. I highly recommend Transtech's services. If you have any further questions,please feel free to contact me at the below information. Sincerely, Mark Persico,AICP Assistant City Manager T:(626)939-8401 E:mpersico@westcovina.org 1444 West Garvey Avenue•West Covina•CA 91790•Phone(626)939-8401 •Fax(626)939-8406 ANEW / �■ TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSIECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 4. References 4.5 co (44re. V OA` i = J.+s° �y,� N 1960 9701 Las Tunas Drive • Temple City•California 91780•626-285-2171 November 17,2020 Subject: Transtech Engineers, Inc. Reference Letter—Municipal Services To Whom It May Concern: Transtech has been serving the City of Temple City since 2012. I have had the pleasure to work with the Transtech team as City Manager since 2014. Transtech currently provides full City Engineering as well as Building and Safety Services for the City of Temple City. They have always provided high-quality services in an efficient and cost- effective manner. They are highly responsive to any issues or requests that the City may have while having the City's best interest in their mind. Based on my professional experience with Transtech and my staff, the City's, and feedback we receive from the Community, we have been very satisfied with their services over the years. Transtech Engineers, Inc. provides full Contract City Engineering as well as Building and Safety Services in the capacity of City Engineering, City Traffic Engineering, Public Works Engineering, CIP Management, Construction Management, Grant Management, Building Official, Building Inspector, and Building Plan Check/Review, and as-needed Professional Services inclusive of planning,design, project management,construction management, and inspection. They provide excellent customer care and service internally to City staff and the public who frequently interacts with them through both their Engineering and Building and Safety Services. Their leadership and continued service commitment to the City through the current pandemic has been exemplary and has allowed the City to continue to offer building and engineering-related services. On behalf of the City and based on my professional experiences with Transtech, we highly recommend their services. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, Bryan Cook City Manager (626)285-2171 ext.4105 bcook(cr�templecity.us TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TearvstFcti Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 4. References 4.6 CQ . F,©� WiJ Z 1 1 CITY OF COMMERCE .' 9a Jose D.Jimenez,Director of Economic 404, ,t„,„ migeto." Development and Planning ' ik, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING November 16, 2020 Subject: Letter of Reference-Transtech Engineers, Inc. To Whom It May Concern: It is my pleasure to recommend and provide full support for Transtech Engineers, Inc. As Director with two different municipalities, I've had the distinct pleasure of utilizing Transtech for a variety of municipal services. Currently, we are partnered with Transtech Engineers, Inc. to provide Building and Safety Services, as well as City Engineering Services to the City of Commerce. They serve in the capacity of Building Official, Permit Technician, Building Inspector, Building Plan Check/Review, City Engineer, City Traffic Engineer, Public Works Engineering, CIP Management, Construction Management, Grant Management, and as-needed Professional Services inclusive of planning, design, project management, construction management, and inspection. Transtech has always provided the highest quality work; their staff is professional and courteous; their work is efficient and cost effective; and they always have the best interest of the City in their mind. They have extensive public works, engineering, and building and safety knowledge and experience. In both municipalities, Transtech staff has always been professional, responsive, and flexible in meeting the City's needs and expectations. The firm has proven themselves to be a great asset to the City and a reliable partner in getting projects completed. They pride themselves on customer services and have always been professional and courteous with all of their interactions with the City and the public. Their leadership and continued service commitment to the City through the current pandemic has been exemplary and has allowed the City to continue to offer several related services. On behalf of the City, and based on my professional experiences with Transtech, I highly recommend their services. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at iiimenez(a.ci.commerce.ca.us, or via phone at(323)722-4805 ext.2389. Sincerely, • 1/;;;74... 1212 Jose D. Jimenez Director of Economic Development and Planning 2535 Commerce Way• Commerce,California 90040• (323) 722-4805 • FAX(323) 888-6841 Ae\, mum TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Project Management Services TRAnsrECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 4. References 4.7 City of Alhambra Community Development Department November 16,2020 IF Subject:Transtech Engineers,Inc. Letter of Recommendation •}T I To Whom It May Concern: Gateway to the Sax Gabriel Valley Transtech Engineers,Inc.has been providing the City of Alhambra full services in both Building and Safety,as well as City Engineering Services for nearly 27 years. 111 South First Street They serve in the capacity of Building Official, Permit Technician, Building Inspector, Alhambra California and Building Plan Check/Review, City Engineer, City Traffic Engineer, Public Works 91801 Engineering,CIP Management,Construction Management,Grant Management,and as-needed Professional Services inclusive of planning, design, project management, construction management,and inspections. The professional experience the City of Alhambra has had with Transtech's services and their staff,has been extremely satisfying over the years.They continue to provide the highest quality of work, have always been professional, efficient, and cost effective,while having the best interest of the City in mind. Their leadership and continued service commitment to the City through the current pandemic has been exemplary and has allowed the City to continue to offer building and engineering related services. Their commitment to quality and quick responsiveness for any needs the City may have sets them apart from others.I confidently recommend them for their services. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.I can be reached at(626)570-5041. Best Regards, CITY OF AL MBRA 1 Marc Castagnola,AICP -- Director of Community Devel.pment Department mcastagnola(a citvofalhambra.org A01". MOM TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSrrch Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects 4. References 4.8 City of San Marino y a November 16, 2020 Subject:Transtech Engineers. Inc. Reference Letter To Whom It May Concern: It is my pleasure to recommend Transtech Engineers. Inc., a professional firm that currently provides traffic engineering services for the City of San Marino. Most recently they completed our City's Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey setting the speed limits for over 60 street segments citywide. They also conduct various traffic reviews and studies for traffic engineering related requests from the City and the community.They have extensive public works,traffic engineering,city engineering,and building and safety knowledge and experience. Based on my professional experience with Transtech and their staff over the course of the last 3 years. I can affirm that the City is satisfied with their services.They provide high quality work and are professional. efficient and cost effective. I have found that they approach each task with the City's best interest in mind. Their commitment to quality and quick responsiveness to our needs sets them apart from others. I can confidently recommend them for their services and am looking forward to a continued working relationship with them. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely. • Michael Throne, PE Director of Parks and Public Works/City Engineer • 2200 Huntington Drive,San Marino,CA 91108 • (626)300-0700• cityofsanlarino.org • \ ,t,. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No. 2020-11, Project Management Services TRANSIECII Related to SR-T10 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 4. References 4.9 CIT Y N T A i2 I C.4 PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY PAUL S.LEON SCOTT OCHOA MAYOR CITY MANAGER DEBRA DORST-PORADA SHEILA MAUTZ MAYOR PRO TEM CITY CLERK ALAN D.WAPNER JAMES R.MILHISER JIM W.BOWMAN TREASURER RUBEN VALENCIA COUNCIL MEMBERS TITO HAES SECUTIVE DIRECTOR December 18,2020 Subject: Transtech Engineers,Inc.Reference Letter To Whom It May Concern: It is my pleasure to write this reference letter for Transtech Engineers, Inc. based on my experience with them in the City of Ontario. Transtech serves as City's project and program manager for various CIP Projects, including some of the largest. They have always been professional and courteous with all of their interactions with the City and the public,and provide highest quality services in an efficient and cost effective manner. They have extensive public works,engineering,and building and safety knowledge and experience. Their commitment to quality and quick responsiveness for any needs the City may have sets them apart from others. On behalf of the City,and based on my professional experiences with Transtech, I highly recommend their services. If you have any further questions,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely�, ' +"Beers Design&Construction—Project Manager P:909.395.28061C:816.388.02121F:909.395.2601 d beers%uonta r ioca.qov City of Ontario 1333 S.Bon View Ave Ontario CA,91761 1333 SOUTH BON VIEW AVENUE•ONTARIO,CALIFORNIA 91761-4406•(909)395-2800•FAX:(909)395-2801 www.ontarioca.gov ®Printed on recycled paper. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Protect Management Services TRANSTEC{f Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 4. References 4.10 EUNICE M.ULLOA MARK HARGROVE Mayor fir =�� MARC LUCIO PAUL A.RODRIGUEZ,Ed.D. S y Council Members TOM IIAUGHEY MATTHEW C.BALLANTYNE Mayor Pro Tran ` City Manager CITY of CHINO November 18, 2020 Subject: Transtech Engineers, Inc. Reference Letter To Whom It May Concern: Transtech currently provides construction management, project management, design engineering, public works plan review, grant writing and public works services to the City. It is my pleasure to write this reference letter for Transtech Engineers, Inc. based on my experience with them in the City of Chino. Transtech provides the highest quality work; their staff is professional and courteous; their work is efficient and cost effective; and they always have the best interest of the City in their mind.They have extensive public works, engineering, and building and safety knowledge and experience. They pride themselves on customer services and have always been professional and courteous with all of their interactions with the City and the public. Their leadership and continued service commitment to the City through the current pandemic has been exemplary. Their commitment to quality and quick responsiveness for any needs the City may have sets them apart from others. On behalf of the City, and based on my professional experiences with Transtech, I highly recommend their services. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincrely, 64-12"`--- Amer Jakher, PE Director of Public Works T: (909)334-3265 E: aiakher(a�citvofchino.orq 13220 Central Avenue,Chino,California 91710 �cY Mailing Address: P.O.Box 667,Chino,California 91708-0667 (909)334-3250•(909)334-3720 Fax Web Site: www.cityofchino.org TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services Tearvsck Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Protects .47 5. Standard Draft Professional Services Agreement and ht4NSTECII Insurance Requirements Est. 1989 5. Standard Draft Professional Services Agreement and Insurance Requirements 5.1 The following are comments we received on the contract from our Insurance Attorney for the City's review. If selected by the City, we will appreciate the opportunity of having our Attorney discuss the final contract language to ensure our insurance is in compliance with current laws and regulations and meets the City's requirements with the City's Attorney. Notwithstanding the foregoing,either party 3.5.4 Cooperation:Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one reserves the right to deny a request to perform any another,and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents arr,;may be additional acts or execute or deliver any such necessary,appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement./.'-.. 4-- ' additional instruments or documents that in any 3.5.5 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the way might increase either party's contractual or other party.either legal,administrative or other...Ise.arising out of or in connection'.'.ith legal obligations or risks. this Agreement,the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and/(' ver from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all other costs of such action, 3.5.6 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend. indemnify and hold the as part of prevailing party's total damages City,its officials.officers.employees.volunteers and agents free and harmless from any attributable to the non-prevailing party's and all claims:-demands-causes-of-action,costs.expenses. liability, loss. damage or proportionate percentage of fault as determined by to the extentinjury.in law or equity,to property or persons.including wrongful death.in-any--manner /sarising out of or-incident to-anyaleged'acts,omissions or willful misconduct of Consultant, a court of competent jurisdiction its officials,officers,employees.agents.consultants and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services,the.Project or this Agreement.including t� wit i u r�tt n tpje rnent of all consequ^nti�l do a e an `Et�`'me s ee bpd other as part of ClienCs tota tl e s p o s p c r f,u s e em, a y a c .o rom ten duns re a e cos ani expensep, and rlsk,anY-. - . • '- 'ngsaf_euay ind �nstitutedagainst - .... -- . that-may-be-ren r'- - - •• - tsor volunteers,-in any such suit,action-or-other!eget-proceeding: Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors,officials,officers employees,agents and/or volunteers,for any and ,c J" „ 1 en'sWta o s Of 1 geofta Ca ego -rcaxr. all legal°exp�'nses aM Post"fhdrrer7`r y chi of t3ri�e'u cont ec i'�i 'here1w1t f w_in Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds,if any.received by the City,its directors,officials officers, employees,agents or volunteers 3.5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties -."ith respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations.understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. EXHIBIT D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be'::ritten on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the consultant and"Covered Professional Services"as designated in the policy must specifically include'::ork performed under this agreement.The policy limit shall be no less than 51.000,000 per claim and in the aggregate.The policy must"pay on beha1tf or,the„insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defends die-policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability [Aao:t.m.a.oe cocss:er. coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City.its officials. employees and agents.using standard ISO endorsement No.CG 2010 with an .m,current insurance edition prior to 1992.Consultant also agrees to require all contractors.and carders e-wo«er',en:i subcontractors to do like:-;ise. n Bir certi eEq(s atert� 4ele G3tha`the insurer will provide 30 days notice to City of pr_nr.�� any cancellation oTcoveragq!\'Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation,or that any party,:gill-endeavor'las opposed to being required)to comply,.'.1th the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is ackno'::ledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage,, required to be provided by Consultant or any subcontractor.is intended to apply first and on a primary.noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. ,f,�. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020-11, Project Management Services TRAIySfECIf \41:2) Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects 686T 153 11331SNIMI ;uawaBpapaoular/ epueppy •g 6. Addenda Acknowledgement 6.1 None posted. But, if any Addenda is issued that we are not aware of,Transtech will comply. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL For RFP No.2020.71,Project Management Services TRANSTECh Related to SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvements Projects Attachment E I-10 Rosemead Boulevard Freeway Ramp Improvements Funding Agreement (FTIP) #: LA9918871 FTIP #: LA9918871 MEASURE R FUNDING AGREEMENT HIGHWAY PROGRAM (General) Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 This Funding Agreement ("FA") is made and entered into effective as of April 7, 2020 ("Effective Date"), and is by and between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA") and City of Rosemead ("GRANTEE") for I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements, LACMTA Project ID# MR4.1.2.08 and FTIP# LA9918871, (the "Project"). This Project is eligible for funding under Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan. WHEREAS, LACMTA adopted Ordinance #08-01, the Traffic Relief and Rail Expansion Ordinance, on July 24, 2008 (the "Ordinance"), which Ordinance was approved by the voters of Los Angeles County on November 4, 2008 as "Measure R" and became effective on January 2, 2009. WHEREAS, $780,000,000 in Measure R funds was identified in Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan for the SR -710 North Gap Closure [tunnel] Project [SR -710 North]. WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board at its May 25, 2017 meeting, reallocated the remaining Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion, if consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR -710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. WHEREAS, the funding set forth herein is intended to fund the Project Approval/ Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction, of the Project. WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board, at its September 26, 2019 meeting, programmed $6,000,000, in Measure R Funds to GRANTEE for Project Approval/ Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction, subject to the terms and conditions contained in this FA; and WHEREAS, the Funds are currently programmed as follows: $300,000 in Measure R Funds in Fiscal Year FY 2020-21, $500,000 in FY 2021-22, $200,000 in FY 2022-23, $4,600,000 in FY 2023-24, and $400,000 in FY 2024-25. The total designated for Project Approval/ Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction of the Project is $6,000,000. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: The terms and conditions of this FA consist of the following and each is incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein: 1. Part I — Specific Terms of the FA 2. Part II — General Terms of the FA 3. Attachment A — Project Funding Rev: 02.20.2020 1 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 4. Attachment B — Measure R Expenditure Plan Guidelines 5. Attachment B-1— Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget 6. Attachment C — Scope of Work 7. Attachment D — Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines 8. Attachment D-1— intentionally omitted 9. Attachment D-2 — Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report 10. Attachment E — Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Sheet 11. Attachment F — Bond Requirements 12. Attachment G — Special Grant Conditions 13. Any other attachments or documents referenced in the above documents In the event of a conflict, the Special Grant Conditions, if any, shall prevail over the Specific Terms of the FA and any attachments and the Specific Terms of the FA shall prevail over the General Terms of the FA. Rev: 02.20.2020 2 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this FA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the dates indicated below: LACMTA: LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY in Phillip A. Washington Chief Executive Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARY C. WICKHAM County Counsel By: Deputy GRANTEE: CITY OF ROSEMEAD By: Gloria Molleda City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Rachel H. Richman City Attorney Date: Date: 441-7)1-0 Date: Date: Rev: 02.20.2020 3 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 PART SPECIFIC TERMS OF THE FA Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 1. Title of the Project (the "Project"): I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements Project Approval/ Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction. LACMTA Project ID# MR4.1.2.08, FTIP# LA9918871. 2. Grant Funds: 2.1 Programmed Funds for this Project consist of the following: Measure R Funds. 2.2 To the extent the Measure R Funds are available; LACMTA shall make to GRANTEE a grant of the Measure R funds in the amount of $6,000,000 (the "Fund") for the Project. LACMTA Board of Directors' action of September 26, 2019 granted the Measure R Funds for the Project. The Funds are programmed over five years for Fiscal Years (FY) FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22, FY 2022-23, FY 2023-24, and FY 2024-25. 3. This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter's expenditures. LACMTA will withhold five percent (5%) of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. 4. Attachment A the "Project Funding" documents all sources of funds programmed for the Project as approved by LACMTA. The Project Funding includes the total programmed funds for the Project, including the Funds programmed by LACMTA and, if any, the GRANTEE Funding Commitment of other sources of funding. The Project Funding also includes the fiscal years in which all the funds for the Project are programmed. The Funds are subject to adjustment by subsequent LACMTA Board Action. 5. Attachment B-1 is the Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget (the "Expenditure Plan"). It is the entire proposed cash flow, the Budget and financial plan for the Project, which includes the total sources of all funds programmed to the Project, including GRANTEE and other entity funding commitments, if any, for this Project as well as the fiscal year and quarters the Project funds are anticipated to be expended. GRANTEE shall update the Expenditure Plan annually, no later than December 31, and such update shall be submitted to LACMTA's Senior Executive Officer of Construction & Engineering in writing. If the LACMTA's Senior Executive Officer of Construction & Engineering concurs with such updated Expenditure Plan in writing, Attachment B-1 shall be replaced with the new Attachment B-1 setting forth the latest approved Expenditure Plan. Payments under this FA shall be consistent with Attachment B-1 as revised from time to time. Any change to the final milestone date must be made by a fully executed amendment to this FA. 6. Attachment C is the "Scope of Work". The GRANTEE shall complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work. This Scope of Work shall include a detailed description of the Rev: 02.20.2020 4 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 Project and the work to be completed, including anticipated Project milestones and a schedule consistent with the lapsing policy in Part II, Section 9, and a description of the Project limits, if applicable. No later than December 31 of each year, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA if there are any changes to the final milestone date set forth in the schedule or any changes to the Scope of Work. If LACMTA agrees to such changes, the parties shall memorialize such changes in an amendment to this FA. Work shall be delivered in accordance with the schedule and scope identified in this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing in an amendment to this FA. If GRANTEE fails to meet milestones or delivery of the Project, LACMTA will have the option to suspend or terminate the FA for default as described in Part II, Sections 2, 9, 10 and 11 herein below. To the extent interim milestone dates are not met but GRANTEE believes and can show documentation acceptable to LACMTA supporting GRANTEE'S ability to make up the time so as to not impact the final milestone date, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA of such changes in its Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Reports and such interim milestone dates will automatically be amended to the latest interim milestone dates provided in the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports Attachment D-2. In no event can the final milestone date be amended by a Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. 7. No changes to this FA, including but not limited to the Funds, and any other source of funds from LACMTA in the Project Funding, Expenditure Plan or the Scope of Work shall be allowed without an amendment to the original FA, approved and signed by both parties. 8. Attachment D is the "Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines". GRANTEE shall complete the "Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report". The Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report are attached to this FA as Attachment D_2 in accordance with Attachment D — Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines. 9. Attachment E, the "FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF)", is required to ensure that the Project is programmed correctly in the most up-to-date FTIP document. The FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF) can be found in ProgramMetro FTIP database under the reports section at h=://program.metro.net. All projects that receive funding through Measure R must be programmed into the FTIP, which includes locally funded regionally significant projects for information and air quality modeling purposes. GRANTEE shall review the Project in ProgramMetro each year and update or correct the Project information as necessary during a scheduled FTIP amendment or adoption. GRANTEE will be notified of amendments and adoptions to the FTIP via e-mail. Changes to the FTIP through ProgramMetro should be made as soon as possible after GRANTEE is aware of any changes to the Project, but no later than October 1 of the year the change or update is effective. Should GRANTEE fail to meet this date, it may affect GRANTEE's ability to access funding, delay the Project and may ultimately result in the Funds being lapsed. 10. LACMTA anticipates it may need to avail itself of lower cost bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes and/or Build America Bonds as defined in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 or similar types of bonds (collectively, the 'Bonds") to provide at least a portion of its funding commitments under this Agreement to GRANTEE. GRANTEE shall ensure that the expenditure of the Funds disbursed to GRANTEE does not jeopardize the tax -exemption of the interest, the Federal subsidy payment or the tax credit, as applicable, as specified in the Bond Requirements Rev: 02.20.2020 5 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 attached as Attachment F to this Agreement. GRANTEE agrees to provide LACMTA with progress reports, expenditure documentation, and any other documentation as reasonably requested by LACMTA and necessary for LACMTA to fulfill its responsibilities as the grantee or administrator or bond issuer of the Funds. With regard to LACMTA debt financing to provide any portion of the Funds, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable actions as may be requested of it by LACMTA's Project Manager for the Project, to assist LACMTA in demonstrating and maintaining over time, compliance with the relevant sections of the Federal Tax Code to maintain such bonds tax status. 11. GRANTEE shall comply with the "Special Grant Conditions" attached as Attachment G, if any. 12. No changes to the (i) Grant amount, (ii) Project Funding, (iii) the Scope of Work (except as provided herein), (iv) Final milestone date or (v) Special Grant Conditions, shall be allowed without a written amendment to this FA, approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee and GRANTEE. Modifications that do not materially affect the terms of this FA, such as redistributing Funds among existing budget line items or non- material schedule changes must be formally requested by GRANTEE and approved by LACMTA in writing. Non -material changes are those changes which do not affect the grant amount or its schedule, Project Funding, or the Scope of Work, including the Work schedule. 13. LACMTA's Address: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention: Julio Perucho LACMTA Project Manager Mail Stop 99-18-2 Phone (213) 922-4387 E-mail PeruchoJ@metro.net 14. GRANTEE's Address: City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Attention: Christopher Daste Phone: (626) 569-2158 Email: cdaste@cityofrosemead.org Rev: 02.20.2020 6 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 PART II GENERAL TERMS OF THE FA 1. TERM Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 The term of this FA shall commence on the Effective Date of this FA, and shall terminate upon the occurrence of all of the following, unless terminated earlier as provided herein: (i) the agreed upon Scope of Work has been completed; (ii) all LACMTA audit and reporting requirements have been satisfied; and (iii) the final disbursement of the Funds has been made to GRANTEE. All eligible Project expenses as defined in the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D), incurred after the FA Effective Date shall be reimbursed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing. 2. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION Should LACMTA determine there are insufficient Measure R Funds available for the Project, LACMTA may suspend or terminate this FA by giving written notice to GRANTEE at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of such suspension or termination. If a Project is suspended or terminated pursuant to this section, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE any costs incurred after that suspension or termination date, except those costs necessary to: (i) to return any facilities modified by the Project construction to a safe and operable state; and (ii) suspend or terminate the construction contractor's control over the Project. LACMTA's share of these costs will be consistent with the established funding percentages outlined in this F.A. 3. INVOICE BY GRANTEE Unless otherwise stated in this FA, the Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report, with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre -approved by LACMTA, all as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA, shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA Project Manager at the email address shown in Part I and to LACMTA Accounts Payable Department as shown below. Submit invoice with supporting documentation to: ACCOUNTSPAYABLEOMETRO.NET (preferable) or mail to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. O. Box 512296 Los Angeles, CA 90051-0296 All invoice material must contain the following; information: Re: LACMTA Project ID# MR4.1.2.08 and FA# FA9200000000MR41208 [Julio Perucho; Mail Stop 99-18-2] Rev: 02.20.2020 7 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 4. USE OF FUNDS Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 4.1 GRANTEE shall utilize the Funds to complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work and in accordance with the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines and the specifications for use for the transportation purposes described in the Ordinance. 4.2 Attachment C shall constitute the agreed upon Scope of Work between LACMTA and GRANTEE for the Project. The Funds, as granted under this FA, can only be used towards the completion of the Scope of Work detailed in Attachment C. 4.3 GRANTEE shall not use the Funds to substitute for any other funds or projects not specified in this F.A. Further, GRANTEE shall not use the Funds for any expenses or activities above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (Attachment C) without an amendment to the FA approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his Designee. To the extent LACMTA provides GRANTEE with bond or commercial paper proceeds, such Funds may not be used to reimburse for any costs that jeopardize the tax exempt nature of such financings as reasonably determined by LACMTA and its bond counsel. 4.4 GRANTEE must use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner. If GRANTEE intends to use a consultant or contractor to implement all or part of the Project, LACMTA requires that such activities be procured in accordance with GRANTEE's contracting procedures and consistent with State law as appropriate. GRANTEE will also use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner when the Funds are used to pay "in-house" staff time. This effective use of funds provision will be verified by LACMTA through on- going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. 4.5 GRANTEE'S employee, officers, councilmembers, board member, agents, or consultants (a "GRANTEE Party") are prohibited from participating in the selection, award, or administration of a third -party contract or sub -agreement supported by the Funds if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. A conflict of interest would include, without limitation, an organizational conflict of interest or when any of the following parties has a financial or other interest in any entity selected for award: (a) a GRANTEE Party (b) any member of a GRANTEE Party's immediate family, (c) a partner of a GRANTEE Party; (d) any organization that employs or intends to employ any of the above. This conflict of interest provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. 4.6 If a facility, equipment (such as computer hardware or software), vehicle or property, purchased or leased using the Funds, ceases to be used for the proper use as originally stated in the Scope of Work, or the Project is discontinued, any Funds expended for that purpose must be returned to LACMTA as follows: GRANTEE shall be required to repay the Funds in proportion to the useful life remaining and in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio. 4.7 If the Project requires the implementation of an Intelligent Transportation Systems ("ITS") project, GRANTEE shall ensure the Project is consistent with the Regional ITS Architecture. Attachment H, the Los Angeles County Regional ITS Rev: 02.20.2020 8 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 Architecture (CONNECT -IT) Consistency Self -Certification Form, must be completed and signed for planned ITS projects and/or ITS projects that use local, state, or federal funds programmed or administered through LACMTA. Refer to www.laconnect-it.com to find information about the CONNECT -IT Service Packages. 4.8 If any parking facilities are designed and/or constructed using the Funds, GRANTEE shall coordinate with LACMTA parking program staff (see www.metro.net for staff listing) in the planning, design and management of the facility and shall ensure that its implementation is consistent with the LACMTA adopted parking policy. For the parking policy, see http://media.metro.net/1rojects_studies/call projects/images/09%20Appendix%20D%20Pa rking%20Policy_pdf REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS Funds will be released on a reimbursement basis in accordance with invoices submitted in support of the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. Reimbursements via Automated Clearing House (ACH) will be made at no cost to GRANTEE. GRANTEE must complete the. ACH form and submit such form to LACMTA before grant payments can be made. ACH Request Forms can be found at www.metro.net/projects/call—projects/call projects -reference - documents/. GRANTEE must provide detailed supporting documentation with its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any, must be spent in direct proportion to the Funds with each quarter's payment. 6. REPORTING AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS/PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS 6.1 GRANTEE shall submit the draft of Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report (Attachment D-2) within sixty (60) days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November, February, May and August to the LACMTA Project Manager for review and pre -approval of the applicable report. LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Reports within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Grantee shall submit the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report no later than five (5) days after receipt of LACMTA's written approval. Should GRANTEE fail to submit either the draft or pre -approved reports within five (5) days of the due date and/or submit incomplete reports, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE until the completed required reports are received, reviewed, and approved. The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports shall include all appropriate documentation (such as contractor invoices, timesheets, receipts, etc.), and any changes to interim milestone dates that do not impact the final milestone date. All supporting documents must include a clear justification and explanation of their relevance to the Project. If no activity has occurred during a particular quarter, GRANTEE will still be required to submit the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports indicating no dollars were expended that quarter. If a request for reimbursement exceeds $500,000 in a single month, then GRANTEE can submit such an invoice once per month with supporting documentation. Expenses that are not invoiced to LACMTA Accounts Payable Rev: 02.20.2020 9 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 within ninety (90) days after the lapsing date specified in Part II, Section 9.1 below are not eligible for reimbursement. 6.2 GRANTEE shall submit the Project expenditure estimates for the subsequent fiscal year by February of each year. LACMTA will use the estimates to determine the Project budget for the upcoming fiscal year. 6.3 LACMTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct audits of the Project as deemed appropriate, such as financial and compliance audits, interim audits, pre- award audits, performance audits and final audits. LACMTA will commence a final audit within six months of receipt of acceptable final invoice, provided the Project is ready for final audit (meaning all costs and charges have been paid by GRANTEE and invoiced to LACMTA, and such costs, charges and invoices are properly documented and summarized in the accounting records to enable an audit without further explanation or summarization including actual indirect rates for the period covered by the FA period under review). GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain proper accounting procedures and cash management records and documents in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GRANTEE shall reimburse LACMTA for any expenditure not in compliance with the Scope of Work and/or not in compliance with other terms and conditions of this F.A. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE's own expenditures submitted to LACMTA for this Project shall be in compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE's contractors, consultants and suppliers expenditures submitted to LACMTA through GRANTEE's Quarterly Progress/Expenditures shall be in compliance with OMB Circular A-87 or Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 225 (whichever is applicable). Findings of the LACMTA audit are final. When LACMTA audit findings require GRANTEE to return monies to LACMTA, GRANTEE agrees to return the monies within thirty (30) days after the final audit is sent to GRANTEE. 6.4 GRANTEE's records shall include, without limitation, accounting records, written policies and procedures, contract files, original estimates, correspondence, change order files (including documentation covering negotiated settlements), invoices, and any other supporting evidence deemed necessary by LACMTA to substantiate charges related to the Project (all collectively referred to as "records"). Such records shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives to the extent deemed necessary by LACMTA to adequately permit evaluation of expended costs. Such records subject to audit shall also include, without limitation, those records deemed necessary by LACMTA to evaluate and verify, direct and indirect costs, (including overhead allocations) as they may apply to costs associated with the Project. These records must be retained by GRANTEE for three years following final payment under this Agreement. Payment of retention amounts shall not occur until after the LACMTA's final audit is completed. 6.5 GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to comply with the requirements of Part II, Section 5, paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 above. GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to cooperate fully in furnishing or in malting available to LACMTA all records deemed necessary by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives related to the Project. Rev: 02.20.2020 10 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 6.6 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall be afforded access to all GRANTEE'S records and its contractors related to the Project, and shall be allowed to interview any employee of GRANTEE and its contractors through final payment to the extent reasonably practicable. 6.7 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall have access to the offices of GRANTEE and its contractors, shall have access to all necessary records, including reproduction, at no charge to LACMTA, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.8 When business travel associated with the Project requires use of a vehicle, the mileage incurred shall be reimbursed at the mileage rates set by the Internal Revenue Service, as indicated in the United States General Services Administration Federal Travel Regulation, Privately Owned Vehicle Reimbursement Rates. 6.9 GRANTEE shall be responsible for ensuring all contractors/ subcontractors for the Project comply with the terms of the Ordinance. GRANTEE shall cooperate with LACMTA Management Audit Services Department such that LACMTA can meet its obligations under the Ordinance. 6.10 GRANTEE shall certify each invoice by reviewing all subcontractor costs and maintaining internal control to ensure that all expenditures are allocable, allowable and reasonable and in accordance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.11 GRANTEE shall also certify final costs of the Project to ensure all costs are in compliance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.12 In addition to LACMTA's other remedies as provided in this FA, LACMTA may withhold the Funds if the LACMTA audit has determined that GRANTEE failed to comply with the Scope of Work (such as misusing Funds or failure to return Funds owed to LACMTA in accordance with LACMTA audit findings) and /or is severely out of compliance with other terms and conditions as defined by this FA, including the access to records provisions of Part II, Section 6. 7. GRANT This is a one-time only grant of the Measure R Funds subject to the terms and conditions agreed to herein. This grant does not imply nor obligate any future funding commitment on the part of LACMTA. Rev: 02.20.2020 11 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 8. SOURCES AND DISPOSITION OF FUNDS 8.1 The obligation for LACMTA to grant the Funds for the Project is subject to sufficient Funds being made available for the Project by the LACMTA Board of Directors. If such Funds are not made available as anticipated from Measure R Program revenues, LACMTA will have the right to adjust the cash flow accordingly until such funds become available. LACMTA shall have no obligation to provide any other funds for the Project, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by LACMTA. 8.2 GRANTEE shall fully fund and contribute the GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any is identified in the Project Funding (Attachment A), towards the cost of the Project. If the Funds identified in Attachment A are insufficient to complete the Project, GRANTEE agrees to secure and provide such additional non-LACMTA programmed funds necessary to complete the Project. 8.3 GRANTEE shall be responsible for any and all cost overruns for the Project pursuant to Section 8.2. 8.4 GRANTEE shall be eligible for the Funds up to the grant amount specified in Part I, Section 2 of this FA subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. Any Funds expended by GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of this FA shall not be reimbursed nor shall they be credited toward the GRANTEE Funding Commitment requirement, without the prior written consent of LACMTA. GRANTEE Funding Commitment dollars expended prior to the year the Funds are awarded shall be spent at GRANTEE's own risk, or as delineated in a Letter of No Prejudice executed by the prospective GRANTEE and LACMTA. 8.5 If GRANTEE receives outside funding for the Project in addition to the Funds identified in the Project Funding and the Expenditure Plan at the time this grant was awarded, this FA shall be amended to reflect such additional funding. If, at the time of final invoice or voucher, funding for the Project (including the Funds, GRANTEE Funding Commitment, and any additional funding) exceeds the actual Project costs, then the cost savings shall be applied in the same proportion as the sources of funds from each party to this FA as specified in the Project Funding and both the Funds and GRANTEE Funding Commitment required for the Project shall be reduced accordingly. LACMTA shall have the right to use any cost savings associated with the Funds at its sole discretion, including, without limitation, programming the unused Funds to another project or to another grantee. If, at the time of final voucher, it is determined that GRANTEE has received Funds in excess of what GRANTEE should have received for the Project, GRANTEE shall return such overage to LACMTA within 30 days from final voucher. TIMELY USE OF FUNDS/ REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS 9.1 GRANTEE must demonstrate timely use of the Funds by: (i) Executing this FA within ninety (90) days of receiving formal transmittal of the FA from LACMTA, or by December 31 of the Rev: 02.20.2020 12 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 first Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, whichever date is later; and (ii) Beginning Project Design, Preliminary Engineering (PE) within six (6) months from completion of environmental clearance, if appropriate. (iii) Expending Project Development or Right -of -Way costs (including by deposit into a condemnation action) by the end of the second (2nd) fiscal year following the year the Funds were first programmed; and (iv) Executing Contracts for Construction or Capital purchase within twelve (12) months from the date of completion of design; and (v) Delivering Work in accordance with schedule; changes to the schedule will require an Amendment to Attachment C to reflect updated milestone dates. Meeting the Project milestone due dates as agreed upon by the LACMTA and GRANTEE in Attachment C (Scope of Work) of this FA; and (vi) Submitting the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA; and (vii) Expending the Funds granted under this FA for allowable costs within three years or 36 months July 1 of the Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, unless otherwise stated in this FA. All Funds programmed for FY 2020-21 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2023. All Funds programmed for FY 2021-22 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2024. All Funds programmed for FY 2022-23 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2025. All Funds programmed for FY 2023-24 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2026. All Funds programmed for FY 2024-25 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2027. 9.2 In the event that the timely use of the Funds is not demonstrated as described in Part II, Section 9.1 of this FA, the Project will be reevaluated by LACMTA and the Funds may be reprogrammed to another project by the LACMTA Board of Directors in accordance with the Ordinance. In the event that all the Funds are reprogrammed, this FA shall automatically terminate. 10. DEFAULT A Default under this FA is defined as any one or more of the following: (i) GRANTEE fails to comply with the terms and conditions contained herein; and/or (ii) GRANTEE fails to perform satisfactorily or make material changes, as determined by LACMTA at its sole discretion, to the Expenditure Plan, the Scope of Work, or the Project Funding without LACMTA's prior written consent or approval as provided herein. 11. REMEDIES 11.1 In the event of a Default by GRANTEE, LACMTA shall provide written notice of such Default to GRANTEE with a 30 -day period to cure the Default. In the event GRANTEE fails to cure the Default, or commit to cure the Default and commence the same Rev: 02.20.2020 13 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 within such 30 -day period to the satisfaction of LACMTA, LACMTA shall have the following remedies: (i) LACMTA may terminate this FA; (ii) LACMTA may make no further disbursements of Funds to GRANTEE; and/or (iii) LACMTA may recover from GRANTEE any Funds disbursed to GRANTEE as allowed by law or in equity. 11.2 Effective upon receipt of written notice of termination from LACMTA, GRANTEE shall not undertake any new work or obligation with respect to this FA unless so directed by LACMTA in writing. Any Funds expended after termination shall be the sole responsibility of GRANTEE. 11.3 The remedies described herein are non-exclusive. LACMTA shall have the right to enforce any and all rights and remedies herein or which may be now or hereafter available at law or in equity. 12. COMMUNICATIONS 12.1 GRANTEE shall ensure that all Communication Materials contain recognition of LACMTA's contribution to the Project as more particularly set forth in "Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines" available online at http_//metro.net/partners-civic. The Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines may be changed from time to time during the course of this Agreement. GRANTEE shall be responsible for complying with the latest Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines during the term of this Agreement, unless otherwise specifically authorized in writing by the LACMTA Chief Communications Officer. 12.2 For purposes of this Agreement, "Communications Materials" include, but are not limited to, press events, public and external newsletters, printed materials, advertising, websites radio and public service announcements, electronic media, and construction site signage. A more detailed definition of "Communications Materials" is found in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines. 12.3 The Metro logo is a trademarked item that shall be reproduced and displayed in accordance with specific graphic guidelines. The preferred logo lock-up for Funding Recipients to use is included in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines. 12.4 GRANTEE shall ensure that any subcontractor, including, but not limited to, public relations, public affairs, and/or marketing firms hired to produce Project Communications Materials for public and external purposes will comply with the requirements contained in this Section. 12.5 The LACMTA Project Manager shall be responsible for monitoring GRANTEE's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Section. GRANTEE's failure to comply with the terms of this Section shall be deemed a default hereunder and LACMTA shall have all rights and remedies set forth herein. 13. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS Rev: 02.20.2020 14 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 13.1 This FA, along with its Attachments, constitutes the entire understanding between the parties, with respect to the subject matter herein. The FA shall not be amended, nor any provisions or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the parties who agreed to the original FA or the same level of authority. Adoption of revisions or supplements to the Guidelines shall cause such revisions or supplements to become incorporated automatically into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 13.2 GRANTEE is obligated to continue using the Project dedicated to the public transportation purposes for which the Project was initially approved. The Project right- of-way, ight- ofway, the Project facilities constructed or reconstructed on the Project site, and/or Project property purchased, excluding construction easements and excess property (whose proportionate proceeds shall be distributed in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio), shall remain dedicated to public transportation use in the same proportion and scope and to the same extent as described in this FA. Equipment acquired as part of the Project, including office equipment, vehicles, shall be dedicated to that use for their full economic life cycle, including any extensions of that life cycle achieved by reconstruction, rehabilitation, or enhancements. 13.3 In the event that there is any legal court (e.g., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, or the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California) proceeding between the parties to enforce or interpret this FA, to protect or establish any rights or remedies hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees. 13.4 Neither LACMTA nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or committed to be done by GRANTEE under or in connection with any work performed by and or service provided by GRANTEE, its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors under this FA. GRANTEE shall fully indemnify, defend and hold LACMTA and its subsidiaries, and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any liability and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of risk of property, any environmental obligation, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of the Project, including without limitation: (i) use of the Funds by GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors; (ii) breach of GRANTEE's obligations under this FA; or (iii) any act or omission of GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors in the performance of the work or the provision of the services, in connection with the Project including, without limitation, the Scope of Work, described in this FA. 13.5 Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligation hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by unforeseen causes including acts of God, acts of a public enemy, and government acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the affected party. Each party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any such circumstances claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performance of any obligations under this FA. Rev: 02.20.2020 15 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 13.6 GRANTEE shall comply with and ensure that work performed under this FA is done in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and procedural requirements including Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and the applicable requirements and regulations of LACMTA. GRANTEE acknowledges responsibility for obtaining copies of and complying with the terms of the most recent federal, state, or local laws and regulations, and LACMTA requirements including any amendments thereto. 13.7 GRANTEE agrees that the applicable requirements of this FA shall be included in every contract entered into by GRANTEE or its contractors relating to work performed under this FA and LACMTA shall have the right to review and audit such contracts. 13.8 GRANTEE shall not assign this FA, or any part thereof, without prior approval of the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his designee. Any assignment by GRANTEE without said prior consent by LACMTA shall be void and unenforceable. 13.9 This FA shall be governed by California law. If any provision of this FA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. 13.10 The covenants and agreements of this FA shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. 13.11 GRANTEE will advise LACMTA prior to any key Project staffing changes. Notice will be given to the parties at the address specified in Part I, unless otherwise notified in writing of change of address. 13.12 GRANTEE, in the performance of the work described in this FA, is not a contractor nor an agent or employee of LACMTA. GRANTEE attests to no organizational or personal conflicts of interest and agrees to notify LACMTA immediately in the event that a conflict, or the appearance thereof, arises. GRANTEE shall not represent itself as an agent or employee of LACMTA and shall have no powers to bind LACMTA in contract or otherwise. Rev: 02.20.2020 16 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General 00 O N r -I O O O O 0 0 O O N G1 T�4 u v O to v O a b 0 ami a, v w 0 0 Cd Q) v 0 0 w 0 H u v 0 W O E O O O Cl Cl O tfi OO O O O O O O to 0 Cl 6�+ 0 0 � 0 0 w 0 o w O vt C o O O O O O w 0 0 0 o Cl O of N Cl 0 0 0 0 O to 0 0 est 0 0 69 0 Cl N 0 O 0 O 0 Cl 64 69 tft r� 0 Cl o o 0 o yq O O O p wy O N o N 0 N 69 O 6'9 O yj Efi o N N o o C o C O �I O O O 64 o b9 0 69 to 0 N o 0 0 Fjs{ 0 M 0 M 0 M 69 6R Ea9 H9 w to to vt z yF F y A rA z Cti p w Q a W a o aa d o day ff 0 y x w 0 o a v" w IP4 FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 ATTACHMENT B MEASURE R EXPENDITURE PLAN GUIDELINES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY State Law Requires All Measure R Project and Program Sponsors to Submit an Expenditure Plan To be eligible to receive Measure R revenues, an agency sponsoring a capital project or program must by state law (AB 2321) submit an expenditure plan that is acceptable to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Pursuant to this law, LACMTA cannot release Measure R funds to capital project or program sponsors until an expenditure plan containing the following elements is submitted, reviewed and deemed satisfactory by LACMTA. LACMTA staff will request that an expenditure plan be submitted before malting a recommendation to the LACMTA Board to program funds to that project: o The estimated total cost for each project and program and/or each project or program activity; o Funds other than Measure R that the project or program sponsor anticipates will be expended on the projects and programs and/or each project or program activity; o The schedule during which the project sponsor anticipates funds will be available for each project and program and/or each project or program activity; and, o The expected completion dates for each project and program and/or project or program activity. Each of the above elements must be provided in enough detail to determine consistency with Measure R, the Long Range Transportation Plan for Los Angeles County, and the Los Angeles County Transportation Improvement Program (also a statutorily mandated function), as follows: o Project or program scope of work, including sufficient information to determine funding eligibility, including, but not limited to, the anticipated proportional use of current rail rights-of-way, state highways, and below -ground subways versus any other rights-of-way or above -ground work; o A current -year cost estimate breakdown of the major sub -elements of the project such as overhead, environmental and permit work, design and engineering, right-of-way, construction/installation (including maintenance facilities, rail yard, equipment and other major components), construction/installation support, interest costs, rolling stock, and other supporting components; o Any extraordinary project cost escalation issues, such as extraordinary commodity, right- of-way, surety, energy costs, etc.; o A specific and accurate description of the source, commitment, and anticipated annual availability of any federal, state, local, or private funding identified for the project if applicable including a 3% local funding contribution to rail projects if indicated in Measure R and necessary to meet project expenses, and if the source funds are in current or year -of -expenditure dollars; Rev: 11-1-14 1 FA Measure R Hwys Sub Attachment B Measure R Expenditure Guidelines FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 o An annual schedule, in current dollars, of anticipated costs by the cost estimate categories described above; and; o The expected completion by month and year of project or program completion. Below is an excerpt of AB 2321 (2008, Feuer), the state legislation that requires the expenditure plan. What AB 2321 (2008, Feuer) Says About the Expenditure Plan: Section b (3) B (1) Prior to suhmitting the ordinance to the voters, the MTA shall adopt an expenditure plan for the net revenues derived from the tax. The expenditure plan shall include, in addition to other projects and programs identified by the MTA, the specified projects and programs listed in paragraph (3) ofsubdivision (h), the estimated total costfor each project and program, funds other than the taxrevenues that the MTA anticipates will he expended on the projects and programs, and the schedule during which the MTA anticipates funds will he availahle for each project and program. The MTA shall also identifyin its expenditure plan the expected completion dates for each project descrihed in subparagraph (A) ofparagraph (3) ofsuhdhdsion (h). To he eligible to receive revenues derived from the tax, an agency sponsoring a capital project or capital program shall submit to to MTA an expenditure plan for its project or program containing the same elements as the expenditure plan that MTA is required by this subdivision to prepare. (k) No later than 365 days prior to the adoption ofan amendment descrihed in paragraph (1) to an expenditure plan adopted pursuant to suhdivisjon (4 including, hut not limited to, the expenditure plan adopted by the MTA hoard as 'AttachmentA "in Ordinance #08-01 adopted by the hoard on July 24, 2008, and in addition to any other notice requirements in the proposing ordinance, the hoard shall notify the Memhers of the Legislature representing the County ofLos Angeles ofall of the following, (1) A description of the proposed amendments to the adopted expenditure plan that would do any ofthe following. (A) Affect the amount ofnetrevenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to this act that is proposed to he expended on a capital project orprojects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (B) Affect the schedule for the a vailahility offends proposed to he expended on a capital project orprojects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (C) Affect the schedule for the estimated or expected completion date ofa capital project or projects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (2) The reason for the proposed amendment. (3) The estimated impact the proposed amendment will have on the schedule, cost, scope, or timely a vailahility offunding for the capital project or projects contained in the adopted expenditure plan. Rev: 11-1-14 2 FA Measure R Hwys Sub Attachment B Measure R Expenditure Guidelines ATTACHMENT B-1 - EXPENDITURE PLAN COST & CASH FLOW BUDGET Measure R Program - Funding Agreement Projects - FA# 9200000000MR41208 Project Title: I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements Project#: MR4.1.2.08 PROGRAMMED SOURCES OF FUNDS SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2020.21 1 Qtr1 FY 2020.21 Qtr2 1 FY 2020.21 1 tr3 FY 2020.21 Qtr4 1 FY 2021-22 tr1 FY 2021-22 tr2 FY 2021.22 tr3 FY 2021.22 Qtr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $500 $1,500 $3,000 $25,000 $35,000 $35,000 $50,000 $150,000 PS&E $7,500 $12,500 $15,000 $235,000 $120,000 $60,000 $100,000 $100,000 $650,000 RW Support $0 Const. Support $0 RW $0 Construction i i i i i $0 Total MEASURER 1 $8,000 1 $14,000 1 $18,000 1 $260,000 $155,000 $95,000 $150,000 $100,000 $800,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $8,000 $14,000 $18,000 $260,000 $155,000 $95,000 $150,000 $100,000 $800,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2022.23 tr1 FY 2022.23 Qtr2 FY 2022-23 tri FY 2022.23 Qbr4 FY 2023.24 Qbri FY 2023-24 n Qtr2 FY 2023.24 Qtr3 FY 2023.24 Qtr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $0 PS&E $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 RW Support $0 Const. Support $25,000 $25,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $650,000 RW $0 Construction $100,000 $11000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $4,100,000 Total MEASURER 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 $25,000 1 $125,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $4,800,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $125,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $4,800,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 202425 tri FY 2024-25 Qtr2 FY 202425 Qtr3 FY 202425 Qtr4 FY 2025.26 Qtr1 FY 2025-26 Qtr2 FY 2025-26 Qtr3 FY 2025.26 Qtr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $0 PS&E $0 RW Support $0 Const. Support $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 RW $0 Construction $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Total MEASURE R $200,000 $200,000 1 SO I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 $400,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 CGU SUMMARY OF ALL FUNDS PAED $500 $1,500 $3,000 $25,000 $35,000 I $35,000 $50,000 $0 1 $150,000 P5&E $32,500 $37,500 $15,000 $235,000 $120,000 1 $60,000 $100,000 1 $100,000 1 $700,000 RW Support $0 1 $01 $0 I SO I SO I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 Const Support $50,000 1 $50,000 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 1 $750,000 RW I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 Construction 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 1 $0 1 $100,000 1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $4,400,000 TOTAL MILESTONES 1 $233,000 1 $239,000 1 $43,000 1 $385,000 1 $1,305,000 $1,245,000 $1,300,000 $1,250,000 $6,000,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS $233,000 $239,000 $43,000 $385,000 1 $1,305,000 1 $1,245,000 $1,300,000 I $1,250,000 $6,000,000 SUM NON-LACMTA FUNDS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $233,000 $239,000 $43,000 $385,000 $1,305,000 $1,245,000 $1,300,000 $1,250,000 $6,000,000 FTIP #: LA9918871 ATTACHMENT C SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT TITLE: I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements. Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 PROJECT LOCATION: The project is located in the City of Rosemead at the intersection of Rosemead Boulevard (State Route [SR] -164), Glendon Way, and Interstate 10 (I-10) Freeway Westbound (WB) On and Off Ramps at Rosemead Boulevard. PROJECT LIMITS: This project limits are the following: the intersection of Rosemead Boulevard (SR -164) and Glendon Way (approximate postmile: Route 164, LA 5.7) and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps at Rosemead Boulevard (approximate postmile: Route 10, LA 26.8), and extend approximately 500, north, east, south and west of the intersection to accommodate geometric/lane adjustments as necessary. NEXUS TO HIGHWAY OPERATION, DEFINITION/PROJECT PURPOSE: The proposed project involves improvements to Rosemead Boulevard (SR -164) and Glendon Way (approximate postmile: Route 164, LA 5.7) and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps at Rosemead Boulevard (approximate postmile: Route 10, LA 26.8). The improvements include geometric realignment and additional lanes to increase capacity, improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion at the intersection, which will continue to worsen over time without improvements. PROJECT BACKGROUND: The proposed project was identified, and was awarded LACMTA Measure R funding, as part of a broader package of projects Imown as the SR -710 Mobility Improvement Projects (MIPS). The SR - 710 MIPS are the result of reallocated Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion. These projects are consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR - 710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. Rosemead Boulevard is one of the busiest regional corridors that extends from SR -60 to I-10 and from I-10 to the I-210 Freeways. Due to insufficient geometric configuration and lane capacities at the Rosemead Boulevard and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps, significant delays are experienced throughout the day. PROJECT BUDGET: COMPONENT PA/ED PS&E R/W Support R/W Capital Construction Support Construction Capital Total Budget Rev: 05.03.19 AMOUNT 150,000 700,000 0 0 750,000 4.400.000 $6,000,000 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 SCOPE: The City plans to improve Rosemead Boulevard (SR -164) and Glendon Way and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps at Rosemead Boulevard and prepare PA/ED, PS&E, R/W, and Construction phase documents. The proposed improvements are as follows: 1. Widen east side of Rosemead Boulevard to add an exclusive right turn lane from NB Rosemead Boulevard to WB I-10 Freeway easterly On Ramp. 2. Add an additional lane for the I-10 Freeway easterly WB Off Ramp. 3. Add an exclusive right turn lane from WB Glendon Way to NB Rosemead Boulevard. 4. Eliminate left turn lane from I-10 Freeway westerly WB Off -Ramp to WB Glendon Way. 5. If determined to be feasible after further engineering analysis, widen west side of Rosemead Boulevard to provide a wider right turn lane (current right turn lane is approx. 10' wide, which is narrow). Widening this right turn lane by V or 2' (which will require narrowing the sidewalk, accordingly) would improve the traffic flow. 6. Reconfigure geometric alignment of west approach on Glendon Way west of Rosemead Boulevard and provide a left turn lane for from WB Glendon Way to WB I-10 Freeway westerly On Ramp. 7. Widen south-west corner of Glendon Way and I-10 WB westerly On-ramp to provide proper right turn lane and curb return to accommodate right turn traffic onto the ramps. DESIGN: I. Preliminary Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Conduct field visits of the project area to identify design issues. Record existing site conditions in photographs and/or video. B. Conduct survey of the project area, establishing horizontal and vertical control for the project as necessary. C. Identify and coordinate with all utilities in the project area to facilitate the final design of the Project. D. Verify if a geotechnical survey will be necessary. If yes, conduct geotechnical investigations as necessary. E. Verify if right-of-way (R/W) acquisitions and/or vacations will be necessary. At this point all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. F. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and establish required environmental, review, approval and permitting process. G. Prepare construction cost estimate. II. Environmental Analysis It is anticipated this project will be either an exempt project or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Prepare Initial Study (IS), consistent with CEQA Guidelines. B. If IS results in any impacts, prepare MND or any other applicable environmental document as necessary. Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 C. Prepare the Draft IS and Draft MND for public circulation as necessary, respond to questions and comments, and finalize the environmental process. D. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W for required environmental review and approval. III. Final Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Prepare plans for the required improvements, consistent with City and/or Caltrans format. B. Assist the City for any Community Information Workshop if necessary. C. Prepare construction specifications. D. Prepare an engineer's construction cost estimate based on the itemized quantity take -off from the contract documents. E. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and obtain required approval and permits. F. Complete Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) Bid Package. IV. Project Management Grantee expects to provide overall project and program management, funding management through its in-house staff, and by using its in-house, already approved, engineering consultant. RIGHT-OF-WAY: At this point, all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. CONSTRUCTION: The construction contract will be bid out per Public Contract Code and City requirements. Grantee expects to provide construction management, inspection, contract administration, funding management through its in-house staff, and by using its in-house, already approved, engineering consultant. Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 MILESTONES: The implementation schedule for this project will be as follows: Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work START DATE COMPLETION DATE SOLICITATION BID PROPOSAL 7/20 2/21 Develop Solicitation Package 7/20 9/20 RFP Advertisement 9/20 11/20 Evaluations 11/20 12/20 Selection 12/20 1/21 Contract Award 1/21 2/21 Fully Executed Contract 2/21 2/21 PLANNING 2/21 8/21 Coordinate with LA County for regional system compatibility and integration 2/21 Until end of project Review and Data Collection 2/21 5/21 Prepare Design Criteria/Requirements, including coordination with LACO for regional system compatibility and integration 2/21 8/21 PA&ED 2/21 2/22 Prepare IS, if applicable MND, finalize environmental approval 2/21 2/22 PS&E 2/21 8/22 Preliminary PS&E 2/21 10/21 Final PS&E 10/21 8/22 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW, APPROVALS, AND PERMITS 3/22 12/22 Local Agencies 3/22 12/22 Caltrans 3/22 12/22 CONSTRUCTION 1/23 10/24 PS&E Bid Package Advertisement 1/23 3/23 Contract Award 4/23 5/23 Fully Executed Contract 5/23 5/23 Construction 6/23 7/24 Punch list allowance during System Integration and Testing 8/24 10/24 System Integration and Testing 8/24 10/24 Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918871 ATTACHMENT C — Location Map(s) PROJECT LOCATION MAP 4 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 OWiden east side of Rosemead Boulevard to add an exclusive right turn lane from NB Rosemead Boulevard to WB I-10 Freeway easterly On Ramp. OAdd an additional lane for the I-10 Freeway easterly WB Off Ramp. 3O Add an exclusive right turn lane from WB Glendon Way to NB Rosemead Boulevard. G Eliminate left turn lane from I-10 Freeway westerly WB Off -Ramp to WB Glendon Way. OIf determined to be feasible after further engineering analysis, widen west side of Rosemead Boulevard to provide a wider right turn lane (current right turn lane is approx. 10' wide, which is narrow). Widening this right turn lane by 1' or 2' (which will require narrowing the sidewalk, accordingly) would improve the traffic flow. OReconfigure geometric alignment of west approach on Glendon Way west of Rosemead Boulevard and provide a left turn lane for from WB Glendon Way to WB I-10 Freeway westerly On Ramp. OWiden south-west corner of Glendon Way and I-10 WB westerly On-ramp to provide proper right turn lane and curb return to accommodate right turn traffic onto the ramps. Rev: 05.03.19 G FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918871 _ Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 FA ATTACHMENT D PROJECT REPORTING & EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES REPORTING PROCEDURES Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report (Attachment D-2) are required for all projects. The GRANTEE shall be subject to and comply with all applicable requirements of the funding agency regarding project -reporting requirements. In addition, GRANTEE will submit the Quarterly Expenditure Report to the LACMTA, after receiving LACMTA Project Manager's acceptance of the draft report, at ACCOUNTSPAYABLEOMETRO.NET or by mail to Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Accounts Payable, P. O. Box 512296, Los Angeles, California 90051-0296. Please note that letters or other forms of documentation may not be substituted for this form. • The Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report covers all activities related to the project and lists all costs incurred. It is essential that GRANTEE provides complete and adequate response to all the questions. The expenses listed must be supported by appropriate documentation with a clear explanation of the purpose and relevance of each expense to the project. • In cases where there are no activities to report, or problems causing delays, clear explanation, including actions to remedy the situation, must be provided. • GRANTEE is required to track and report on the project schedule. LACMTA will monitor the timely use of funds and delivery of projects. Project delay, if any, must be reported each quarter. • The draft Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report is due to the LACMTA as soon as possible after the close of each quarter, but no later than the following dates for each fiscal year: Quarter Report Due Date July —September November 30 October - December February 28 January - March May 31 April - June August 31 LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Expenditure Report within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Rev: 02.13.2020 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines FTIP #: LA9918871 Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 Upon completion of the Project a final report that includes project's final evaluation must be submitted. EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES • Any activity or expense charged above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (FA Attachment C) is considered ineligible and will not be reimbursed by the LACMTA unless prior written authorization has been granted by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee. • Any expense charged to the grant must be clearly and directly related to the project. Administrative cost is the ongoing expense incurred by the GRANTEE for the duration of the project and for the direct benefit of the project as specified in the Scope of Work (Attachment C). Examples of administrative costs are personnel, office supplies, and equipment. As a condition for eligibility, all costs must be necessary for maintaining, monitoring, coordinating, reporting and budgeting of the project. Additionally, expenses must be reasonable and appropriate to the activities related to the project. • LACMTA is not responsible for, and will not reimburse any costs incurred by the GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of the FA, unless written authorization has been granted by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee. DEFINITIONS Allowable Cost: To be allowable, costs must be reasonable, recognized as ordinary and necessary, consistent with established practices of the organization, and consistent with industry standard of pay for work classification. • Excessive Cost: Any expense deemed "excessive" by LACMTA staff would be adjusted to reflect a "reasonable and customary" level. For detail definition of "reasonable cost", please refer to the Federal Register OMB Circulars A-87 Cost Principals for State and Local Governments; and A-122 Cost Principals for Nonprofit Organizations. • Ineligible Expenditures: Any activity or expense charged above and beyond the approved Scope of Work is considered ineligible. Rev: 02.13.2020 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines LACMTA FA M EASU RE R ATTACH M ENT D-2 QUARTERLY PROGRESS / EXPENSE REPORT GRANTEES ARE REQUESTED TO EMAIL THIS REPORT TO ACCOUNTSPAYABLEna METRO.NET or submit by mail to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. O. Box 512296 Los Angeles, California 90051-0296 after the close of each quarter, but no later than November 30, Fehruary 28, May 31 and August 31. Please note that letters or other forms of documentation may not be substituted for this form. Refer to the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D) for further information. SECTION 1: QUARTERLY EXPENSE REPORT Grantee To Complete Invoice # Invoice Date FA# 9200000000MR41208 Quarterly Report # Please itemize grant -related charges for this Quarter on Page 5 of this report and include totals in this Section. Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report LACMTA Measure R Grant $ Project Quarter This Quarter Expenditure Retention Amount Net Invoice Amount (Less Retention) Funds Expended to Date (Include this Quarter) Total Project Budget % of Project Budget Expended to Date Balance Remaining Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report SECTION •R • PROJECT TITLE: I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements FA #: 9200000000MR41208 QUARTERLY REPORT SUBMITTED FOR: Fiscal Year: 2014-2015 2015-20162016-2017 F12017-2018 F-12018-2019 F-] 2019-2020 Quarter: F�Ql: Jul - Sep F7Q2: Oct - Dec F -]Q3: Jan - Mar F -]Q4: Apr - Jun DATE SUBMITTED: LACMTA MODAL CATEGORY: F-IRSTI ❑ Pedestrian ❑ TDM F-] Bicycle Transit Name: LACMTA Project Manager Phone Number: Project Sponsor Contact / Project Manager Contact Name: lob Title: ❑ Signal Synchronization ❑ Goods Movement Perucho 3) 922-4387 Christopher Daste Director of Public Works Public Works of Rosemead Mailing Address: 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, CA 91770 Phone Number: (626) 569-2158 E-mail: crlaste.Rritvofrneemearl org Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report 1. DELIVER.ABI ES & List all deliverables and milestones as stated in the FA, with start and end dates. Calculate the total project duration. DO NOT CHANGB THB ORIGINAL FA MILESTONE STARTAND END DATBS SHOWNINTHB2" AND 3BD CDL LIMNS BELOW. Grantees must make every effort to accuratelyportray milestone dates in the original FA Scope of Work, since this will provide the Basis for calculating anyproject delay. If milestone start and/or end dates change f om those stated in the Original FA Scope of Work, indicate the new dates undel-Actual Schedule helow and re -calculate the project duration. However, this does not change the original milestones in your FA. PER YOUR FA AGREEMENT, ANY CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE MUST BE FORMALLYSUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER TO LACMTA FOR WRITTEN CONCURRENCE. FA Milestones Original FA Schedule in Scope of Work Actual Schedule Start Date End Date Start Date End Date Environmental Clearance Design Bid & Award Design Right -of -Way Acquisition Construction Bid & Award Ground Breaking Event Construction Ribbon Cutting Event Total Project Duration (Months) 2. PROJECT COMPLETION A. Based on the comparison of the original and actual project milestone schedules above, project is (select only one) : FOn schedule per original FA schedule ❑ Between 12-24 months behind original schedule FILess than 12 months behind original schedule F-IMore than 24 months behind original schedule B. Was the project design started within G months of the date originally stated in the FA? Yes ❑ No F -I Not Applicable C. Was a construction contract or capital purchase executed within 9 months after completion of design / specifications? ❑ Yes F -I No ❑ Not Applicable Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report 3. TASKS J MILESTONES ACCOMPLISHED List tasks or milestones accomplished and progress made this quarter. 4. PROJECT DELAY If project is delayed, describe reasons for delay (this quarter). Pay particular attention to schedule delays. If delay is for the same reason as mentioned in previous quarters, please indicate by writing "Same as Previous Quarter". 5. ACTION ITEMS TO RESOLVE DELAY If the project is delayed (as described in #4), include action items that have been, or will be, undertaken to resolve the delay. Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report SECTION 4: ITEMIZED LISTING OF EXPENSES AND CHARGES THIS QUARTER All expenses and charges must he iternized and listed below. Each item listed must be verifiable by an invoice and/or other proper documentation. The total amounts shown here must be equal to this quarter's expenditures listed on page 1 of this report. All expenses and charges must be reflective of the approved budget and rates as shown in the FA Attachment B, Scope of Work. Use additional pages if needed. Note: All receipts, invoices, and time sheets, attached and included with this Expense Report must be listed and shown under the Invoice Number column of the Itemized Listing (above). Invoice Payment Information: LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. ACH Payments require that you complete an ACH Request Form and fax it to Accounts Payable at 213-922-6107. ACH Request Forms can be found at www.metro.net/callforprojects. Written exception requests for Check Payments should be completed and faxed to Accounts Payable at 213-922-6107. I certify that I am the responsible Project Manager or fiscal officer and representative of and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the information stated in this report is true and correct. Date Title Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report ATTACHMENT E - FTIP PROJECT SHEET Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($000) Project Description: Improve 1-10 freeway WB on- & off -ramps at Rosemead Blvd and Glendon Way. Add RT lane from NB SCAG RTP ProJJ'ecl #: Study:N/A Is tvlode[: Model #: Rosemead Blvd to WB 1-10 on-ramp; add lane for 1-10 easterly WB off -ramp; remove LT lane from 1-10 westerly WB off -ramp PM: Ali Cayir - (714)883-8677 to WB Glendon Way; widen Rosemead Blvd to allow wider RT lane; reconfigure alignment of west approach on Glendon Way to provide LT lane from WE Glendon Way to WB 1-10 westerly on-ramp; widen SW corner of Glendon Way and 1-10 WB westerly LS: N LS GROUP#: on-ramp. Conformity Category: System :State Hwy Route :10 Postmile: Distance: Phase: No Project Activity Completion Date 10/30/2024 Lane # Extd: Lane # Prop: ImpryDesc: Air Basin: SCAB Envir Doc: - Toll Rate: Toll Colc Loc: Toll Method: Hov acs eg Ioc: Uza: Los Angeles -Long Sub -Area: Sub -Region: San Gabriel Valley 0.00 Beach -Santa Ana COG CTIPS ID: EA M PPNO: Proqram Code: RAMPS ? MODIFY/LANE ADDITIONS Slop Loc: PHASE PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 BEYOND PROG TOTAL MR20H - Measure R 20% Highway PE $300 $500 $50 $0 $850 RW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON $0 $0 $150 $4,600 $45,150 LO SUBTOTAL $300 $500 $200 $4,600 $46,000 TOTAL PE: $850 TOTAL RW: $0 TOTAL CON: $5,150 TOTAL PROGRAMMED: $6,000 -General Comment: -Modeling Comment: -TCM Comment: -Amendment Comment: -CMP Comment: -Narrative: Change reason:NEW PROJECT Total Project Cost $6,000 Page 1 Thursday, April 2, 2020 FTIP #: LA9918871 ATTACHMENT F BOND REQUIREMENTS Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 The provisions of this Attachment F apply only if and to the extent some or all of the Funds are derived from LACMTA issued Bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes (collectively, the "Bonds"). GRANTEE acknowledges that some or all of the Funds may be derived from Bonds, the interest on which is tax-exempt for federal tax purposes or with respect to which LACMTA receives a Federal subsidy for a portion of the interest cost or the investor receives a tax credit. GRANTEE further acknowledges its understanding that the proceeds of the Bonds are subject to certain ongoing limitations relating to the use of the assets financed or provided with such proceeds ("Project Costs" or "Project Components") in the trade or business of any person or entity other than a governmental organization (any such use by a person or entity other than a governmental organization is referred to as "Private Use"). Private Use will include any sale, lease or other arrangement pursuant to which a nongovernmental person or entity receives a legal entitlement of a Project Component and also includes certain agreements pursuant to which a nongovernmental person will operate or manage a Project Component. Each quarterly invoice submitted by GRANTEE to reimburse prior expenditures (or to be received as an advance) shall provide information regarding the specific Project Costs or Project Components to which the Funds which pay that invoice will be allocated and whether there is or might be any Private Use associated with such Project Costs or Project Components. GRANTEE will, for the entire time over which LACMTA's Bonds or other debt remains outstanding, (1) notify and receive LACMTA' s approval prior to entering into any arrangement which will or might result in Private Use and (2) maintain records, including obtaining records from contractors and subcontractors as necessary, of all allocations of Funds to Project Costs or Project Components and any Private Use of such Project Costs or Project Components in sufficient detail to comply and establish compliance with Section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or similar code provision then in effect and applicable, as determined by the LACMTA in consultation with its bond counsel. GRANTEE will designate one or more persons that will be responsible for compliance with the obligations described in this Attachment F and notify LACMTA of such designations. Rev: 05.15.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment F Bond Requirements FTIP #: LA9918871 ATTACHMENT G SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 With regards to Part II, Paragraph 7, the following shall also apply: a. Funds allocated for each SR -710 North Mobility Improvement Project [MIP] shall be on a one-time basis. LACMTA shall not fund any cost increase. Potential cost savings shall remain in the Corridor and shall be assigned to other projects consistent with the purpose of the program as determined by LACMTA. b. Grantee is responsible for all cost overruns incurred. Under no circumstances will the total amount of money that LACMTA reimburses the Grantee exceed the amount of Funds approved by LACMTA. c. LACMTA shall reimburse Grantee up to a maximum amount of $6,000,000 as specified for the Project subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. d. LACMTA shall transfer the Funds to the Grantee on a reimbursement basis only. No advance of Funds shall be allowed. 2. With regards to Part II, Paragraph 8.2, the following shall also apply: a. LACMTA shall not be obligated to program additional funds to the Project. 3. Grantee shall conduct Before and After Studies to evaluate and document the results of project implementation in terms of congestion relief and air quality improvements. a. Grantee shall maintain proper records of the existing conditions before and after each MIP to assess the performance of the completed MIP as well as the overall program. b. A copy of the Before and After Study shall be submitted to LACMTA within six months of completion of the project construction. Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions Attachment F I-10 Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway Ramp Improvements Funding Agreement (FTIP) #: LA9918872 FTIP #: LA9918872 MEASURE R FUNDING AGREEMENT HIGHWAY PROGRAM (General) Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 This Funding Agreement ("FA") is made and entered into effective as of April 7, 2020 ("Effective Date"), and is by and between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA") and City of Rosemead ("GRANTEE") for I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements, LACMTA Project ID# MR4.1.2.09 and FTIP# LA9918872, (the "Project"). This Project is eligible for funding under Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan. WHEREAS, LACMTA adopted Ordinance #08-01, the Traffic Relief and Rail Expansion Ordinance, on July 24, 2008 (the "Ordinance"), which Ordinance was approved by the voters of Los Angeles County on November 4, 2008 as "Measure R" and became effective on January 2, 2009. WHEREAS, $780,000,000 in Measure R funds was identified in Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan for the SR -710 North Gap Closure [tunnel] Project [SR -710 North]. WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board at its May 25, 2017 meeting, reallocated the remaining Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion, if consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR -710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. WHEREAS, the funding set forth herein is intended to fund the Project Approval/ Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction, of the Project. WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board, at its September 26, 2019 meeting, programmed $6,000,000, in Measure R Funds to GRANTEE for Project Approval/ Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction, subject to the terms and conditions contained in this FA; and WHEREAS, the Funds are currently programmed as follows: $150,000 in Measure R Funds in Fiscal Year FY 2020-21, $350,000 in FY 2021-22, $200,000 in FY 2022-23, $200,000 in FY 2023- 24, $4,700,000 in FY 2024-25, and $400,000 in FY 2025-26. The total designated for Project Approval/Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction of the Project is $6,000,000. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: The terms and conditions of this FA consist of the following and each is incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein: 1. Part I — Specific Terms of the FA 2. Part I I — General Terms of the FA 3. Attachment A —Project Funding Rev: 02.20.2020 1 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 4. Attachment B — Measure R Expenditure Plan Guidelines 5. Attachment B-1— Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget 6. Attachment C — Scope of Work 7. Attachment D — Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines 8. Attachment D-1— intentionally omitted 9. Attachment D-2 — Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report 10. Attachment E — Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Sheet 11. Attachment F — Bond Requirements 12. Attachment G — Special Grant Conditions 13. Any other attachments or documents referenced in the above documents In the event of a conflict, the Special Grant Conditions, if any, shall prevail over the Specific Terms of the FA and any attachments and the Specific Terms of the FA shall prevail over the General Terms of the FA. Rev: 02.20.2020 2 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this FA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the dates indicated below: LACMTA: LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Phillip A. Washington Chief Executive Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARY C. WICKHAM County Counsel By: Deputy GRANTEE: CITY OF ROSEMEAD By: Gloria Molleda City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Rachel H. Richman City Attorney Date: Date: G1,11 -co Date: Date: Rev: 02.20.2020 3 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 PART I SPECIFIC TERMS OF THE FA Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 1. Title of the Project (the "Project"): I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements — Project Initiation Document (PID), Project Approval/Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction. LACMTA Project ID# MR4.1.2.09, FTIP# LA9918872. 2. Grant Funds: 2.1 Programmed Funds for this Project consist of the following: Measure R Funds. 2.2 . To the extent the Measure R Funds are available; LACMTA shall make to GRANTEE a grant of the Measure R funds in the amount of $6,000,000 (the "Fund") for the Project. LACMTA Board of Directors' action of September 26, 2019 granted the Measure R Funds for the Project. The Funds are programmed over six years for Fiscal Years (FY) FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22, FY 2022-23, FY 2023-24, FY 2024-25, and FY 2025- 26. 3. This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter's expenditures. LACMTA will withhold five percent (5%) of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. 4. Attachment A the "Project Funding" documents all sources of funds programmed for the Project as approved by LACMTA. The Project Funding includes the total programmed funds for the Project, including the Funds programmed by LACMTA and, if any, the GRANTEE Funding Commitment of other sources of funding. The Project Funding also includes the fiscal years in which all the funds for the Project are programmed. The Funds are subject to adjustment by subsequent LACMTA Board Action. 5. Attachment B-1 is the Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget (the "Expenditure Plan"). It is the entire proposed cash flow, the Budget and financial plan for the Project, which includes the total sources of all funds programmed to the Project, including GRANTEE and other entity funding commitments, if any, for this Project as well as the fiscal year and quarters the Project funds are anticipated to be expended. GRANTEE shall update the Expenditure Plan annually, no later than December 31, and such update shall be submitted to LACMTA's Senior Executive Officer of Construction & Engineering in writing. If the LACMTA's Senior Executive Officer of Construction & Engineering concurs with such updated Expenditure Plan in writing, Attachment B-1 shall be replaced with the new Attachment B-1 setting forth the latest approved Expenditure Plan. Payments under this FA shall be consistent with Attachment B-1 as revised from time to time. Any change to the final milestone date must be made by a fully executed amendment to this FA. Rev: 02.20.2020 4 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 6. Attachment C is the "Scope of Work". The GRANTEE shall complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work. This Scope of Work shall include a detailed description of the Project and the work to be completed, including anticipated Project milestones and a schedule consistent with the lapsing policy in Part II, Section 9, and a description of the Project limits, if applicable. No later than December 31 of each year, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA if there are any changes to the final milestone date set forth in the schedule or any changes to the Scope of Work. If LACMTA agrees to such changes, the parties shall memorialize such changes in an amendment to this F.A. Work shall be delivered in accordance with the schedule and scope identified in this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing in an amendment to this FA. If GRANTEE fails to meet milestones or delivery of the Project, LACMTA will have the option to suspend or terminate the FA for default as described in Part II, Sections 2, 9, 10 and 11 herein below. To the extent interim milestone dates are not met but GRANTEE believes and can show documentation acceptable to LACMTA supporting GRANTEE'S ability to make up the time so as to not impact the final milestone date, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA of such changes in its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports and such interim milestone dates will automatically be amended to the latest interim milestone dates provided in the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports Attachment D-2. In no event can the final milestone date be amended by a Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. 7. No changes to this FA, including but not limited to the Funds, and any other source of funds from LACMTA in the Project Funding, Expenditure Plan or the Scope of Work shall be allowed without an amendment to the original FA, approved and signed by both parties. 8. Attachment D is the "Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines". GRANTEE shall complete the "Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report". The Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report are attached to this FA as Attachment D_2 in accordance with Attachment D — Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines. 9. Attachment E, the "FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF)", is required to ensure that the Project is programmed correctly in the most up-to-date FTIP document. The FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF) can be found in ProgramMetro FTIP database under the reports section at http_//nrogram.metro.net. All projects that receive funding through Measure R must be programmed into the FTIP, which includes locally funded regionally significant projects for information and air quality modeling purposes. GRANTEE shall review the Project in ProgramMetro each year and update or correct the Project information as necessary during a scheduled FTIP amendment or adoption. GRANTEE will be notified of amendments and adoptions to the FTIP via e-mail. Changes to the FTIP through ProgramMetro should be made as soon as possible after GRANTEE is aware of any changes to the Project, but no later than October 1 of the year the change or update is effective. Should GRANTEE fail to meet this date, it may affect GRANTEE's ability to access funding, delay the Project and may ultimately result in the Funds being lapsed. 10. LACMTA anticipates it may need to avail itself of lower cost bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes and/or Build America Bonds as defined in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 or similar types of bonds (collectively, the 'Bonds") to provide at least a portion of its funding commitments under this Agreement to GRANTEE. GRANTEE shall ensure that the expenditure of the Funds Rev: 02.20.2020 5 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 disbursed to GRANTEE does not jeopardize the tax -exemption of the interest, the Federal subsidy payment or the tax credit, as applicable, as specified in the Bond Requirements attached as Attachment F to this Agreement. GRANTEE agrees to provide LACMTA with progress reports, expenditure documentation, and any other documentation as reasonably requested by LACMTA and necessary for LACMTA to fulfill its responsibilities as the grantee or administrator or bond issuer of the Funds. With regard to LACMTA debt financing to provide any portion of the Funds, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable actions as may be requested of it by LACMTA's Project Manager for the Project, to assist LACMTA in demonstrating and maintaining over time, compliance with the relevant sections of the Federal Tax Code to maintain such bonds tax status. 11. GRANTEE shall comply with the "Special Grant Conditions" attached as Attachment G, if any. 12. No changes to the (i) Grant amount, (ii) Project Funding, (iii) the Scope of Work (except as provided herein), (iv) Final milestone date or (v) Special Grant Conditions, shall be allowed without a written amendment to this FA, approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee and GRANTEE. Modifications that do not materially affect the terms of this FA, such as redistributing Funds among existing budget line items or non- material schedule changes must be formally requested by GRANTEE and approved by LACMTA in writing. Non -material changes are those changes which do not affect the grant amount or its schedule, Project Funding, or the Scope of Work, including the Work schedule. 13. LACMTA's Address: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention: Julio Perucho LACMTA Project Manager Mail Stop 99-18-2 Phone (213) 922-4387 E-mail PeruchoJ@metro.net 14. GRANTEE's Address: City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Attention: Christopher Daste Phone: (626) 569-2158 Email: cdaste@cityofrosemead.org Rev: 02.20.2020 6 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 PART II GENERAL TERMS OF THE FA 1. TERM Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 The term of this FA shall commence on the Effective Date of this FA, and shall terminate upon the occurrence of all of the following, unless terminated earlier as provided herein: (i) the agreed upon Scope of Work has been completed; (ii) all LACMTA audit and reporting requirements have been satisfied; and (iii) the final disbursement of the Funds has been made to GRANTEE. All eligible Project expenses as defined in the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D), incurred after the FA Effective Date shall be reimbursed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing. 2. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION Should LACMTA determine there are insufficient Measure R Funds available for the Project, LACMTA may suspend or terminate this FA by giving written notice to GRANTEE at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of such suspension or termination. If a Project is suspended or terminated pursuant to this section, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE any costs incurred after that suspension or termination date, except those costs necessary to: (i) to return any facilities modified by the Project construction to a safe and operable state; and (ii) suspend or terminate the construction contractor's control over the Project. LACMTA's share of these costs will be consistent with the established funding percentages outlined in this FA. INVOICE BY GRANTEE Unless otherwise stated in this FA, the Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report, with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre -approved by LACMTA, all as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA, shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA Project Manager at the email address shown in Part I and to LACMTA Accounts Payable Department as shown below. Submit invoice with supporting documentation to: ACCOUNTSPAYABLEOMETRO.NET (preferablej or mail to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. O. Box 512296 Los Angeles, CA 90051-0296 All invoice material must contain the following information: Re: LACMTA Project ID# MR4.1.2.09 and FA# FA9200000000MR41209 [Julio Perucho; Mail Stop 99-18-2] Rev: 02.20.2020 7 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 4. USE OF FUNDS Project# MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 4.1 GRANTEE shall utilize the Funds to complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work and in accordance with the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines and the specifications for use for the transportation purposes described in the Ordinance. 4.2 Attachment C shall constitute the agreed upon Scope of Work between LACMTA and GRANTEE for the Project. The Funds, as granted under this FA, can only be used towards the completion of the Scope of Work detailed in Attachment C. 4.3 GRANTEE shall not use the Funds to substitute for any other funds or projects not specified in this FA. Further, GRANTEE shall not use the Funds for any expenses or activities above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (Attachment C) without an amendment to the FA approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his Designee. To the extent LACMTA provides GRANTEE with bond or commercial paper proceeds, such Funds may not be used to reimburse for any costs that jeopardize the tax exempt nature of such financings as reasonably determined by LACMTA and its bond counsel. 4.4 GRANTEE must use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner. If GRANTEE intends to use a consultant or contractor to implement all or part of the Project, LACMTA requires that such activities be procured in accordance with GRANTEE's contracting procedures and consistent with State law as appropriate. GRANTEE will also use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner when the Funds are used to pay "in-house" staff time. This effective use of funds provision will be verified by LACMTA through on- going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. 4.5 GRANTEE'S employee, officers, councilmembers, board member, agents, or consultants (a "GRANTEE Party") are prohibited from participating in the selection, award, or administration of a third -party contract or sub -agreement supported by the Funds if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. A conflict of interest would include, without limitation, an organizational conflict of interest or when any of the following parties has a financial or other interest in any entity selected for award: (a) a GRANTEE Party (b) any member of a GRANTEE Party's immediate family, (c) a partner of a GRANTEE Party; (d) any organization that employs or intends to employ any of the above. This conflict of interest provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. 4.6 If a facility, equipment (such as computer hardware or software), vehicle or property, purchased or leased using the Funds, ceases to be used for the proper use as originally stated in the Scope of Work, or the Project is discontinued, any Funds expended for that purpose must be returned to LACMTA as follows: GRANTEE shall be required to repay the Funds in proportion to the useful life remaining and in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio. 4.7 If the Project requires the implementation of an Intelligent Transportation Systems ("ITS") project, GRANTEE shall ensure the Project is consistent with the Regional ITS Architecture. Attachment H, the Los Angeles County Regional ITS Rev: 02.20.2020 8 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 Architecture (CONNECT -IT) Consistency Self Certification Form, must be completed and signed for planned ITS projects and/or ITS projects that use local, state, or federal funds programmed or administered through LACMTA. Refer to www.laconnect-it.com to find information about the CONNECT -IT Service Packages. 4.8 If any parking facilities are designed and/or constructed using the Funds, GRANTEE shall coordinate with LACMTA parking program staff (see www.metro.net for staff listing) in the planning, design and management of the facility and shall ensure that its implementation is consistent with the LACMTA adopted parking policy. For the parking policy, see http:./ Imedia.metro.net/projects_studies/call–projects/images/09 / 2OAppendix/ 20D%2OPa rking% 20Policy.pdf REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS Funds will be released on a reimbursement basis in accordance with invoices submitted in support of the Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Reports. LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. Reimbursements via Automated Clearing House (ACH) will be made at no cost to GRANTEE. GRANTEE must complete the ACH form and submit such form to LACMTA before grant payments can be made. ACH Request Forms can be found atwww.metro.net/projects/call—projects/calprojects-reference- documents/. GRANTEE must provide detailed supporting documentation with its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any, must be spent in direct proportion to the Funds with each quarter's payment. 6. REPORTING AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS/PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS 6.1 GRANTEE shall submit the draft of Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report (Attachment D-2) within sixty (60) days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November, February, May and August to the LACMTA Project Manager for review and pre -approval of the applicable report. LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Grantee shall submit the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report no later than five (5) days after receipt of LACMTA's written approval. Should GRANTEE fail to submit either the draft or pre -approved reports within five (5) days of the due date and/or submit incomplete reports, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE until the completed required reports are received, reviewed, and approved. The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports shall include all appropriate documentation (such as contractor invoices, timesheets, receipts, etc.), and any changes to interim milestone dates that do not impact the final milestone date. All supporting documents must include a clear justification and explanation of their relevance to the Project. If no activity has occurred during a particular quarter, GRANTEE will still be required to submit the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports indicating no dollars were expended that quarter. If a request for reimbursement exceeds $500,000 in a single month, then GRANTEE can submit such an invoice once per month with supporting documentation. Expenses that are not invoiced to LACMTA Accounts Payable Rev: 02.20.2020 9 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 within ninety (90) days after the lapsing date specified in Part II, Section 9.1 below are not eligible for reimbursement. 6.2 GRANTEE shall submit the Project expenditure estimates for the subsequent fiscal year by February of each year. LACMTA will use the estimates to determine the Project budget for the upcoming fiscal year. 6.3 LACMTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct audits of the Project as deemed appropriate, such as financial and compliance audits, interim audits, pre- award audits, performance audits and final audits. LACMTA will commence a final audit within six months of receipt of acceptable final invoice, provided the Project is ready for final audit (meaning all costs and charges have been paid by GRANTEE and invoiced to LACMTA, and such costs, charges and invoices are properly documented and summarized in the accounting records to enable an audit without further explanation or summarization including actual indirect rates for the period covered by the FA period under review). GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain proper accounting procedures and cash management records and documents in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GRANTEE shall reimburse LACMTA for any expenditure not in compliance with the Scope of Work and/or not in compliance with other terms and conditions of this FA. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE's own expenditures submitted to LACMTA for this Project shall be in compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE's contractors, consultants and suppliers expenditures submitted to LACMTA through GRANTEE's Quarterly Progress/Expenditures shall be in compliance with OMB Circular A-87 or Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 225 (whichever is applicable). Findings of the LACMTA audit are final. When LACMTA audit findings require GRANTEE to return monies to LACMTA, GRANTEE agrees to return the monies within thirty (30) days after the final audit is sent to GRANTEE. 6.4 GRANTEE's records shall include, without limitation, accounting records, written policies and procedures, contract files, original estimates, correspondence, change order files (including documentation covering negotiated settlements), invoices, and any other supporting evidence deemed necessary by LACMTA to substantiate charges related to the Project (all collectively referred to as "records"). Such records shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives to the extent deemed necessary by LACMTA to adequately permit evaluation of expended costs. Such records subject to audit shall also include, without limitation, those records deemed necessary by LACMTA to evaluate and verify, direct and indirect costs, (including overhead allocations) as they may apply to costs associated with the Project. These records must be retained by GRANTEE for three years following final payment under this Agreement. Payment of retention amounts shall not occur until after the LACMTA's final audit is completed. 6.5 GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to comply with the requirements of Part II, Section 5, paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 above. GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to cooperate fully in furnishing or in making available to LACMTA all records deemed necessary by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives related to the Project. Rev: 02.20.2020 10 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 6.6 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall be afforded access to all GRANTEE'S records and its contractors related to the Project, and shall be allowed to interview any employee of GRANTEE and its contractors through final payment to the extent reasonably practicable. 6.7 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall have access to the offices of GRANTEE and its contractors, shall have access to all necessary records, including reproduction, at no charge to LACMTA, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the terms and conditions of this F.A. 6.8 When business travel associated with the Project requires use of a vehicle, the mileage incurred shall be reimbursed at the mileage rates set by the Internal Revenue Service, as indicated in the United States General Services Administration Federal Travel Regulation, Privately Owned Vehicle Reimbursement Rates. 6.9 GRANTEE shall be responsible for ensuring all contractors/ subcontractors for the Project comply with the terms of the Ordinance. GRANTEE shall cooperate with LACMTA Management Audit Services Department such that LACMTA can meet its obligations under the Ordinance. 6.10 GRANTEE shall certify each invoice by reviewing all subcontractor costs and maintaining internal control to ensure that all expenditures are allocable, allowable and reasonable and in accordance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this F.A. 6.11 GRANTEE shall also certify final costs of the Project to ensure all costs are in compliance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this F.A. 6.12 In addition to LACMTA's other remedies as provided in this FA, LACMTA may withhold the Funds if the LACMTA audit has determined that GRANTEE failed to comply with the Scope of Work (such as misusing Funds or failure to return Funds owed to LACMTA in accordance with LACMTA audit findings) and /or is severely out of compliance with other terms and conditions as defined by this FA, including the access to records provisions of Part II, Section 6. 7. GRANT This is a one-time only grant of the Measure R Funds subject to the terms and conditions agreed to herein. This grant does not imply nor obligate any future funding commitment on the part of LACMTA. Rev: 02.20.2020 11 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 8. SOURCES AND DISPOSITION OF FUNDS 8.1 The obligation for LACMTA to grant the Funds for the Project is subject to sufficient Funds being made available for the Project by the LACMTA Board of Directors. If such Funds are not made available as anticipated from Measure R Program revenues, LACMTA will have the right to adjust the cash flow accordingly until such funds become available. LACMTA shall have no obligation to provide any other funds for the Project, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by LACMTA. 8.2 GRANTEE shall fully fund and contribute the GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any is identified in the Project Funding (Attachment A), towards the cost of the Project. If the Funds identified in Attachment A are insufficient to complete the Project, GRANTEE agrees to secure and provide such additional non-LACMTA programmed funds necessary to complete the Project. 8.3 GRANTEE shall be responsible for any and all cost overruns for the Project pursuant to Section 8.2. 8.4 GRANTEE shall be eligible for the Funds up to the grant amount specified in Part I, Section 2 of this FA subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. Any Funds expended by GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of this FA shall not be reimbursed nor shall they be credited toward the GRANTEE Funding Commitment requirement, without the prior written consent of LACMTA. GRANTEE Funding Commitment dollars expended prior to the year the Funds are awarded shall be spent at GRANTEE's own risk, or as delineated in a Letter of No Prejudice executed by the prospective GRANTEE and LACMTA. 8.5 If GRANTEE receives outside funding for the Project in addition to the Funds identified in the Project Funding and the Expenditure Plan at the time this grant was awarded, this FA shall be amended to reflect such additional funding. If, at the time of final invoice or voucher, funding for the Project (including the Funds, GRANTEE Funding Commitment, and any additional funding) exceeds the actual Project costs, then the cost savings shall be applied in the same proportion as the sources of funds from each party to this FA as specified in the Project Funding and both the Funds and GRANTEE Funding Commitment required for the Project shall be reduced accordingly. LACMTA shall have the right to use any cost savings associated with the Funds at its sole discretion, including, without limitation, programming the unused Funds to another project or to another grantee. If, at the time of final voucher, it is determined that GRANTEE has received Funds in excess of what GRANTEE should have received for the Project, GRANTEE shall return such overage to LACMTA within 30 days from final voucher. 9. TIMELY USE OF FUNDS/ REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS 9.1 GRANTEE must demonstrate timely use of the Funds by: (i) Executing this FA within ninety (90) days of receiving formal transmittal of the FA from LACMTA, or by December 31 of the Rev: 02.20.2020 12 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 first Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, whichever date is later; and (ii) Beginning Project Design, Preliminary Engineering (PE) within six (6) months from completion of environmental clearance, if appropriate. (iii) Expending Project Development or Right -of -Way costs (including by deposit into a condemnation action) by the end of the second (2nd) fiscal year following the year the Funds were first programmed; and (iv) Executing Contracts for Construction or Capital purchase within twelve (12) months from the date of completion of design; and (v) Delivering Work in accordance with schedule; changes to the schedule will require an Amendment to Attachment C to reflect updated milestone dates. Meeting the Project milestone due dates as agreed upon by the LACMTA and GRANTEE in Attachment C (Scope of Work) of this FA; and (vi) Submitting the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA; and (vii) Expending the Funds granted under this FA for allowable costs within three years or 36 months July 1 of the Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, unless otherwise stated in this FA. All Funds programmed for FY 2020-21 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2023. All Funds programmed for FY 2021-22 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2024. All Funds programmed for FY 2022-23 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2025. All Funds programmed for FY 2023-24 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2026. All Funds programmed for FY 2024-25 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2027. All Funds programmed for FY 2025-26 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2028. 9.2 In the event that the timely use of the Funds is not demonstrated as described in Part II, Section 9.1 of this FA, the Project will be reevaluated by LACMTA and the Funds may be reprogrammed to another project by the LACMTA Board of Directors in accordance with the Ordinance. In the event that all the Funds are reprogrammed, this FA shall automatically terminate. 10. DEFAULT A Default under this FA is defined as any one or more of the following: (i) GRANTEE fails to comply with the terms and conditions contained herein; and/or (ii) GRANTEE fails to perform satisfactorily or make material changes, as determined by LACMTA at its sole discretion, to the Expenditure Plan, the Scope of Work, or the Project Funding without LACMTA's prior written consent or approval as provided herein. 11. REMEDIES Rev: 02.20.2020 13 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 comply with the terms of this Section shall be deemed a default hereunder and LACMTA shall have all rights and remedies set forth herein. 13. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 13.1 This FA, along with its Attachments, constitutes the entire understanding between the parties, with respect to the subject matter herein. The FA shall not be amended, nor any provisions or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the parties who agreed to the original FA or the same level of authority. Adoption of revisions or supplements to the Guidelines shall cause such revisions or supplements to become incorporated automatically into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 13.2 GRANTEE is obligated to continue using the Project dedicated to the public transportation purposes for which the Project was initially approved. The Project right- of-way, ight- ofway, the Project facilities constructed or reconstructed on the Project site, and/or Project property purchased, excluding construction easements and excess property (whose proportionate proceeds shall be distributed in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio), shall remain dedicated to public transportation use in the same proportion and scope and to the same extent as described in this FA. Equipment acquired as part of the Project, including office equipment, vehicles, shall be dedicated to that use for their full economic life cycle, including any extensions of that life cycle achieved by reconstruction, rehabilitation, or enhancements. 13.3 In the event that there is any legal court (e.g., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, or the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California) proceeding between the parties to enforce or interpret this FA, to protect or establish any rights or remedies hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees. 13.4 Neither LACMTA nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or committed to be done by GRANTEE under or in connection with any work performed by and or service provided by GRANTEE, its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors under this FA. GRANTEE shall fully indemnify, defend and hold LACMTA and its subsidiaries, and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any liability and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of risk of property, any environmental obligation, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of the Project, including without limitation: (i) use of the Funds by GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors; (ii) breach of GRANTEE's obligations under this FA; or (iii) any act or omission of GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors in the performance of the work or the provision of the services, in connection with the Project including, without limitation, the Scope of Work, described in this FA. 13.5 Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligation hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented Rev: 02.20.2020 15 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 11.1 In the event of a Default by GRANTEE, LACMTA shall provide written notice of such Default to GRANTEE with a 30 -day period to cure the Default. In the event GRANTEE fails to cure the Default, or commit to cure the Default and commence the same within such 30 -day period to the satisfaction of LACMTA, LACMTA shall have the following remedies: (i) LACMTA may terminate this FA; (ii) LACMTA may make no further disbursements of Funds to GRANTEE; and/or (iii) LACMTA may recover from GRANTEE any Funds disbursed to GRANTEE as allowed by law or in equity. 11.2 Effective upon receipt of written notice of termination from LACMTA, GRANTEE shall not undertake any new work or obligation with respect to this FA unless so directed by LACMTA in writing. Any Funds expended after termination shall be the sole responsibility of GRANTEE. 11.3 The remedies described herein are non-exclusive. LACMTA shall have the right to enforce any and all rights and remedies herein or which may be now or hereafter available at law or in equity. 12. COMMUNICATIONS 12.1 GRANTEE shall ensure that all Communication Materials contain recognition of LACMTA's contribution to the Project as more particularly set forth in "Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines" available online at http_//metro.net/partners-civic. The Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines may be changed from time to time during the course of this Agreement. GRANTEE shall be responsible for complying with the latest Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines during the term of this Agreement, unless otherwise specifically authorized in writing by the LACMTA Chief Communications Officer. 12.2 For purposes of this Agreement, "Communications Materials" include, but are not limited to, press events, public and external newsletters, printed materials, advertising, websites radio and public service announcements, electronic media, and construction site signage. A more detailed definition of "Communications Materials" is found in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines. 12.3 The Metro logo is a trademarked item that shall be reproduced and displayed in accordance with specific graphic guidelines. The preferred logo lock-up for Funding Recipients to use is included in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines. 12.4 GRANTEE shall ensure that any subcontractor, including, but not limited to, public relations, public affairs, and/or marketing firms hired to produce Project Communications Materials for public and external purposes will comply with the requirements contained in this Section. 12.5 The LACMTA Project Manager shall be responsible for monitoring GRANTEE's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Section. GRANTEE's failure to Rev: 02.20.2020 14 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 or delayed by unforeseen causes including acts of God, acts of a public enemy, and government acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the affected party. Each party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any such circumstances claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performance of any obligations under this FA. 13.6 GRANTEE shall comply with and ensure that work performed under this FA is done in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and procedural requirements including Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and the applicable requirements and regulations of LACMTA. GRANTEE acknowledges responsibility for obtaining copies of and complying with the terms of the most recent federal, state, or local laws and regulations, and LACMTA requirements including any amendments thereto. 13.7 GRANTEE agrees that the applicable requirements of this FA shall be included in every contract entered into by GRANTEE or its contractors relating to work performed under this FA and LACMTA shall have the right to review and audit such contracts. 13.8 GRANTEE shall not assign this FA, or any part thereof, without prior approval of the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his designee. Any assignment by GRANTEE without said prior consent by LACMTA shall be void and unenforceable. 13.9 This FA shall be governed by California law. If any provision of this FA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. 13.10 The covenants and agreements of this FA shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. 13.11 GRANTEE will advise LACMTA prior to any key Project staffing changes. Notice will be given to the parties at the address specified in Part I, unless otherwise notified in writing of change of address. 13.12 GRANTEE, in the performance of the work described in this FA, is not a contractor nor an agent or employee of LACMTA. GRANTEE attests to no organizational or personal conflicts of interest and agrees to notify LACMTA immediately in the event that a conflict, or the appearance thereof, arises. GRANTEE shall not represent itself as an agent or employee of LACMTA and shall have no powers to bind LACMTA in contract or otherwise. Rev: 02.20.2020 16 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General U N O N n 00 IH ON ONa H w A z w 0 F P4 0 o C 0 0 o v 0 0 Cl O C 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 N C> O C O C O 0 C) C> 69 Fs9 H9 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 Ln o 0 C 0 C 0 n bq � iA iA n ioq Cl 0 O 0 0 o 0 0 C o N 0 N 0 N bR b9 yj 69 0 C. C 0 O C 0 o C 0 N 0 N Cl N 0 0 0 N 0 o 0 Ln M 0 0 0 in M 0 0 0 Ln M b9 O O bq O O 64 b4 O O N Wr o 0 0 0 0 0 lA W b4 b9 M O a Lily , ,fl iA y F Ca z z F z W E y y w �i w Q z c7 w IL`,+ w0 a O w � A p 0 W � H Z" w U a W a 0 W 0 p�q 0En E O rn a d w a: d 0 p P4 O w a —W vHi FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 ATTACHMENT B MEASURE R EXPENDITURE PLAN GUIDELINES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY State Law Requires All Measure R Project and Program Sponsors to Submit an Expenditure Plan To be eligible to receive Measure R revenues, an agency sponsoring a capital project or program must by state law (AB 2321) submit an expenditure plan that is acceptable to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Pursuant to this law, LACMTA cannot release Measure R funds to capital project or program sponsors until an expenditure plan containing the following elements is submitted, reviewed and deemed satisfactory by LACMTA. LACMTA staff will request that an expenditure plan be submitted before making a recommendation to the LACMTA Board to program funds to that project: o The estimated total cost for each project and program and/or each project or program activity; o Funds other than Measure R that the project or program sponsor anticipates will be expended on the projects and programs and/or each project or program activity; o The schedule during which the project sponsor anticipates funds will be available for each project and program and/or each project or program activity; and, o The expected completion dates for each project and program and/or project or program activity. Each of the above elements must be provided in enough detail to determine consistency with Measure R, the Long Range Transportation Plan for Los Angeles County, and the Los Angeles County Transportation Improvement Program (also a statutorily mandated function), as follows: o Project or program scope of work, including sufficient information to determine funding eligibility, including, but not limited to, the anticipated proportional use of current rail rights-of-way, state highways, and below -ground subways versus any other rights-of-way or above -ground work; o A current -year cost estimate breakdown of the major sub -elements of the project such as overhead, environmental and permit work, design and engineering, right-of-way, construction/installation (including maintenance facilities, rail yard, equipment and other major components), construction/installation support, interest costs, rolling stock, and other supporting components; o Any extraordinary project cost escalation issues, such as extraordinary commodity, right- of-way, surety, energy costs, etc.; o A specific and accurate description of the source, commitment, and anticipated annual availability of any federal, state, local, or private funding identified for the project if applicable including a 3% local funding contribution to rail projects if indicated in Measure R and necessary to meet project expenses, and if the source funds are in current or year -of -expenditure dollars; Rev: 11-1-14 1 FA Measure R Hwys Sub Attachment B Measure R Expenditure Guidelines FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 o An annual schedule, in current dollars, of anticipated costs by the cost estimate categories described above; and; o The expected completion by month and year of project or program completion. Below is an excerpt of AB 2321 (2008, Feuer), the state legislation that requires the expenditure plan. What AB 2321 (2008. Feuer) Says About the Expenditure Plan: Section b (3) B (� Prior to submitting the ordinance to the voters, the MTA shall adopt an expenditure plan for the net revenues derived from the tax. The expenditure plan shall include, in addition to otherprojects and programs identified by the MTA, the specified projects and programs listed in paragraph (3) ofsuhdivision (b), the estimated total costfor each project and program, funds other than the taxrevenues that the MTA anticipates will be expended on the projects and programs, and the schedule during which the MTA anticipates funds will be available for each project and program. The MTA shall also identifyin its expenditure plan the expected completion dates for each project described in subparagraph (A) ofparagraph (3) ofsubdivision (b). To be eligible to receive revenues derived from the tax, an agency sponsoring a capital project or capital program shall submit to to MTA an expenditure plan for its project or program containing the same elements as the expenditure plan that MTA is required by this subdivision to prepare. (k) No later than 365 days prior to the adoption ofan amendment described in paragraph (1) to an expenditure plan adopted pursuant to subdivision (f), including, but notlimited to, the expenditure plan adopted by the MTA board as 'AttachmentA " in Ordinance #08-01 adopted by the board on July 24, 2008, and in addition to any other notice requirements in the proposing ordinance, the board shall notify the Members of the Legislature representing the County ofLos Angeles ofall of the following.- (1) A description ofthe proposed amendments to the adopted expenditure plan that would do any ofthe following. (A) Affect the amount ofnet revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to this act that is proposed to be expended on a capital project or projects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (B) Affect the schedule for the availability offends proposed to be expended on a capital project or projects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (C) Affect the schedule for the estimated or expected completion date ofa capital project or projects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (2) The reason for the proposed amendment. (3) The estimated impact the proposed amendment will have on the schedule, cost, scope, or timely availability offunding for the capital project orprojects contained in the adopted expenditure plan. Rev: 11-1-14 2 FA Measure R Hwys Sub Attachment B Measure R Expenditure Guidelines ATTACHMENT B-1 - EXPENDITURE PLAN COST & CASH FLOW BUDGET Measure R Program - Funding Agreement Projects - FA# 9200000000MR41209 Project Title: I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements Project#: MR4.1.2.09 PROGRAMMED SOURCES OF FUNDS SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2020.21 Qtrl FY 2020-21 Qtr2 FY 2020,21 Qtri FY M20.21 Qtr4 FY 2021-22 Qt1r1 FY 2021-22 FY 2021.22 I FY 2021.22 Qtr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $500 $1,500 $3,000 $25,000 $35,000 $35,000 $50,000 $0 $150,000 PS&E $7,500 $12,500 $15,000 $85,000 $80,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $350,000 RW Support $0 Const. Support $0 RW $0 Construction $0 Tatal MEASURER 1 $8,000 $14,000 $18,000 $110,000 $115,000 $85,000 $100,000 $50,000 $500,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $8,000 $14,000 $18,000 $110,000 $115,000 $85,000 $100,000 $50,000 $500,000 iiSaO1y4,00018,Qo4 $11Qy000 $0$Q�d$t°A01(J4i0U0 �4 5ywri°�' 7Z r SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2022.23 Qtr FY 2022.23 Qtr2 FY 2022-23 Qtri FY 2022-23 Qtr4 FY 2023.24 Qtri FY 2023.24 Qtr2Qtr FY 2023 -Tia FY 2023.24 Qtr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $0 PS&E $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $60,000 $60,000 $55,000 $375,000 RW Support $0 Const. Support $25,000 $25,000 RW $0 Construction $0 To MEASURE R $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 1 $50,000 1 $60,000 1 $60,000 1 $55,000 1 $25,000 1 $400,000 SUM FROG LACMTA FUNDS: $5o,000 $50,000 $5o,0oo $5o,000 $60,000 $60,000 $55,000 $25,000 $400,000 00E4 `tircio y SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 202425 Qtr FY 202425 Qtr2 FY 2024-25 l Qtr3 FY 202425 Qtr4 FY 2025-26 Qtr1 FY 2025.26 Qtr2 FY 2025.26 Qtr3 FY 2025.26 Qtr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $0 PS&E $0 RW Support $0 Const. Support $160,000 $140,000 $140,000 $160,000 $90,000 $690,000 RW $0 Construction $1,050,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,050,000 $310,000 $4,410,000 Total MEASURE R $1,210,000 $1,140,000 $1,140,000 $1,210,000 $400,000 $0 I SO $0 1 $5,100,000 SUM FROG LACMTA FUNDS: $1,210,000 $1,140,000 $1,140,000 $1,210,000 $400,000 $0 So $0 $5,100,000 SUMMARY OF ALL FUNDS 4o�6SI�449t00.9 PAED $500 $1,500 $3,000 $25,0°° $35,000 1 $35,000 $50,000 $o $150,000 PS&E $57,500 $62,500 $65,000 $135,000 1 $140,000 1 $110,000 $105,000 1 $50,000 $725,000 FIN -support $0 $0 I $0 $0 I SO I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 Cones Support $160,000 $140,000 1 $140,000 $160,000 1 $90,000 1 $0 I So $25,000 1 $715,000 RW $0 I SO I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $o I $0 1 $0 Construction 1 $1,050,000 1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 1 $1,050,000 1 $310,000 1 $0 I $0 $0 $4,410,000 TOTAL MILESTONES I $1,268,000 1 $1,204,000 1 $1,208,000 1 $1,370,000 1 $575,000 1 $145,000 1 $155,00° S75,p00 $6,000,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS $1,268,00° $1,204,000 1 $1,208,0001 $1,370,000 1 $575,000 1 $145,000 1 $155,000 1 $75,000 1 $6,000,000 SUM NON-LACMTA FUNDS So So $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 $01 $0 I So TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,268,000 $1,204,000 $1,208,000 $1,370,000 $575,000 $145,000 $155,000 $75,000 $6,000,000 FTIP #: LA9918872 ATTACHMENT C SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT TITLE: I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements. Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 PROJECT LOCATION: The project is located in the City of Rosemead at the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue, and Interstate 10 (I-10) Freeway Westbound (WB) On and Off Ramps. PROJECT LIMITS: This project limits are the following: the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps (approximate postmile: Route 10, LA 26.3), and extend approximately 300' north, east, south and west of the intersection to accommodate geometric/lane adjustments as necessary. NEXUS TO HIGHWAY OPERATION, DEFINITION/PROJECT PURPOSE: The proposed project involves improvements to Walnut Grove Avenue and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps (approximate postmile: Route 10, LA 26.3). The improvements include geometric realignment to increase capacity, improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion at the intersection, which will continue to worsen over time without improvements. PROJECT BACKGROUND: The proposed project was identified, and was awarded LACMTA Measure R funding, as part of a broader package of projects lrnown as the SR -710 Mobility Improvement Projects (MIPS). The SR - 710 MIPS are the result of reallocated Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion. These projects are consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR - 710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. Walnut Grove Avenue is a regional corridor that extends from SR -60 to I-10 and from I-10 to Las Tunas Drive in the City of San Gabriel north of the City of Rosemead providing connectivity to Las Tunas Drive, which is a major regional east -west corridor. Due to insufficient geometric configuration and lane capacities at the Walnut Grove Avenue and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps, significant delays are experienced throughout the day. PROJECT BUDGET: COMPONENT AMOUNT PA/ED 150,000 PS&E 725,000 R/W Support 0 R/W Capital 0 Construction Support 715,000 Construction Capital 4.410.000 Total Budget $6,000,000 SCOPE: The City plans to improve Walnut Grove Avenue and I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramps and prepare PA/ED, PS&E, R/W, and Construction phase documents. The proposed improvements are as follows: Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 1. Realign SB RT Lane from Walnut Grove Avenue to the I-10 Freeway WB On Ramp, and install a realigned I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramp at Walnut Grove Avenue. 2. Realign striping and north and south approaches of Walnut Grove Avenue at realigned I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramp. 3. Install new traffic signal at realigned I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramp. DESIGN: I. Preliminary Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Conduct field visits of the project area to identify design issues. Record existing site conditions in photographs and/or video. B. Conduct survey of the project area, establishing horizontal and vertical control for the project as necessary. C. Identify and coordinate with all utilities in the project area to facilitate the final design of the Project. D. Verify if a geotechnical survey will be necessary. If yes, conduct geotechnical investigations as necessary. E. Verify if right-of-way (R/W) acquisitions and/or vacations will be necessary. At this point all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. F. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and establish required environmental, review, approval and permitting process. G. Prepare construction cost estimate. II. Environmental Analysis It is anticipated this project will be either an exempt project or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Prepare Initial Study (IS), consistent with CEQA Guidelines. B. If IS results in any impacts, prepare MND or any other applicable environmental document as necessary. C. Prepare the Draft IS and Draft MND for public circulation as necessary, respond to questions and comments, and finalize the environmental process. D. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W for required environmental review and approval. III. Final Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Prepare plans for the required improvements, consistent with City and/or Caltrans format. B. Assist the City for any Community Information Workshop if necessary. C. Prepare construction specifications. D. Prepare an engineer's construction cost estimate based on the itemized quantity take -off from the contract documents. E. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and obtain required approval and permits. Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 F. Complete Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) Bid Package. IV. Project Management Grantee expects to provide overall project and program management, funding management through its in-house staff, and by using its in-house, already approved, engineering consultant. RIGHT-OF-WAY: At this point, all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. CONSTRUCTION: The construction contract will be bid out per Public Contract Code and City requirements. Grantee expects to provide construction management, inspection, contract administration, funding management through its in-house staff, and by using its in-house, already approved, engineering consultant. Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 MILESTONES: The implementation schedule for this project will be as follows: Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work START DATE COMPLETION DATE SOLICITATION BID PROPOSAL 7/20 2/21 Develop Solicitation Package 7/20 9/20 RFP Advertisement 9/20 11/20 Evaluations 11/20 12/20 Selection 12/20 1/21 Contract Award 1/21 2/21 Fully Executed Contract 2/21 2/21 PLANNING 2/21 8/21 Coordinate with LA County for regional system compatibility and integration 2/21 Until end ofproject Review and Data Collection 2/21 5/21 Prepare Design Criteria/Requirements, including coordination with LACO for regional system compatibility and integration 2/21 8/21 PA&ED 2/21 2/22 Prepare IS, if applicable MND, finalize environmental approval 2/21 2/22 PS&E 2/21 4/23 Preliminary PS&E 2/21 4/22 Final PS&E 4/22 4/23 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW, APPROVALS, AND PERMITS 2/23 6/24 Local Agencies 2/23 6/24 Caltrans 2/23 6/24 CONSTRUCTION 4/24 11/25 PS&E Bid Package Advertisement 4/24 6/24 Contract Award 7/24 8/24 Fully Executed Contract 8/24 8/24 Construction 9/24 8/25 Punch list allowance during System Integration and Testing 9/25 11/25 System Integration and Testing 9/25 1 11/25 Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918872 ATTACHMENT C — Location Map(s) PROJECT LOCATION MAP LJ Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 ORealign SB RT Lane from Walnut Grove Avenue to the I-10 Freeway WB On Ramp, and install a realigned I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramp at Walnut Grove Avenue. ORealign striping and north and south approaches of Walnut Grove Avenue at realigned I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramp. OInstall new traffic signal at realigned I-10 Freeway WB On and Off Ramp. Rev: 05.03.19 G FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 Rev: 05.03.19 7 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 FA ATTACHMENT D PROJECT REPORTING & EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES REPORTING PROCEDURES Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report (Attachment D-2) are required for all projects. The GRANTEE shall be subject to and comply with all applicable requirements of the funding agency regarding project -reporting requirements. In addition, GRANTEE will submit the Quarterly Expenditure Report to the LACMTA, after receiving LACMTA Project Manager's acceptance of the draft report, at ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@METRO.NET or by mail to Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Accounts Payable, P. O. Box 512296, Los Angeles, California 90051-0296. Please note that letters or other forms of documentation may not be substituted for this form. • The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report covers all activities related to the project and lists all costs incurred. It is essential that GRANTEE provides complete and adequate response to all the questions. The expenses listed must be supported by appropriate documentation with a clear explanation of the purpose and relevance of each expense to the project. • In cases where there are no activities to report, or problems causing delays, clear explanation, including actions to remedy the situation, must be provided. • GRANTEE is required to track and report on the project schedule. LACMTA will monitor the timely use of funds and delivery of projects. Project delay, if any, must be reported each quarter. • The draft Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report is due to the LACMTA as soon as possible after the close of each quarter, but no later than the following dates for each fiscal year: Quarter Report Due Date July —September November 30 October - December February 28 January - March May 31 April - June August 31 LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Expenditure Report within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Rev: 02.13.2020 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines FTIP #: LA9918872 Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 Upon completion of the Project a final report that includes project's final evaluation must be submitted. EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES • Any activity or expense charged above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (FA Attachment C) is considered ineligible and will not be reimbursed by the LACMTA unless prior written authorization has been granted by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee. • Any expense charged to the grant must be clearly and directly related to the project. Administrative cost is the ongoing expense incurred by the GRANTEE for the duration of the project and for the direct benefit of the project as specified in the Scope of Work (Attachment C). Examples of administrative costs are personnel, office supplies, and equipment. As a condition for eligibility, all costs must be necessary for maintaining, monitoring, coordinating, reporting and budgeting of the project. Additionally, expenses must be reasonable and appropriate to the activities related to the project. • LACMTA is not responsible for, and will not reimburse any costs incurred by the GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of the FA, unless written authorization has been granted by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee. DEFINITIONS Allowable Cost: To be allowable, costs must be reasonable, recognized as ordinary and necessary, consistent with established practices of the organization, and consistent with industry standard of pay for work classification. • Excessive Cost: Any expense deemed "excessive" by LACMTA staff would be adjusted to reflect a "reasonable and customary" level. For detail definition of "reasonable cost", please refer to the Federal Register OMB Circulars A-87 Cost Pzincipals for State and Local Governments; and A-122 Cost Principals for Nonprofit Organizations. • Ineligible Expenditures: Any activity or expense charged above and beyond the approved Scope of Work is considered ineligible. Rev: 02.13.2020 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines LACMTA FA MEASURE R ATTACHMENT D-2 QUARTERLY PROGRESS / EXPENSE REPORT GRANTEES ARE REQUESTED TO EMAIL THIS REPORT TO ACCOU NTSPAYABLEO M ETROM ET or submit by mail to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. O. Box 512296 Los Angeles, California 90051-0296 after the close of each quarter, but no later than November 30, February 28, May 31 and August 31. Please note that letters or other forms of documentation may not be substituted for this form. Refer to the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D) for further information. Grantee To Complete Invoice # Invoice Date FA# 9200000000MR41209 Quarterly Report # Please itemize grant -related charges for this Quarter on Page 5 of this report and include totals in this Section. Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report LACMTA Measure R Grant $ Project Quarter Expenditure This Quarter Expenditure Retention Amount Net Invoice Amount (Less Retention) Funds Expended to Date (Include this Quarter) Total Project Budget % of Project Budget Expended to Date Balance Remaining Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report PROJECT TITLE: I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements FA #: 9200000000MR41209 QUARTERLY REPORT SUBMITTED FOR: Fiscal Year: 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 F-12017-2018 ❑ 2018-2019 ❑ 2019-2020 Quazter: F_�Ql: Jul - Sep F -]Q2: Oct - Dec F-JQ3: Jan - Mar F -]Q4: Apr - Jun DATE SUBMITTED: LACMTA MODAL CATEGORY: F-IRSTI 7Pedestrian Signal Synchronization FTDM 7Bicycle Goods Movement Transit Name: I Julio Perucho LACMTA Project Manager Phone Number: (213) 922-4387 E-mail: PP.mnhoTRmP.trn.nPt Project Sponsor Contact / Project Manager Contact Name: lob Title: Christopher Daste Director of Public Works Public Works of Rosemead Mailing Address: 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, CA 91770 Phone Number: (626) 569-2158 E-mail: cdasteRritvnfi•neemead-ore Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report 1. DELIVERABLES & MILESTONES List all deliverables and milestones as stated in the FA, with start and end dates Calculate the total project duration. DO NOT CHANGB THE ORIGINAL FA MILESTONE STARTAND END DATES SHOWNIN THE2 ND AND 3RD COLUMNS BBLOW. Gsantees must make every effort to accula telt' portray milestone dates in the original FA Scope of Work, since this will provide the hasis for calculating any project delay. If milestone staztand/or end dates change from those stated in the Original FA Scope of Wolk indicate the new dates undez•Actual Schedule below and re -calculate the project duration. However, this does not change the original milestones in youz- FA. PER YOUR FA AGREEMENT, ANY CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE MUST BE FORMALLY SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER TO LACMTA FOR WRITTEN CONCURRENCE. FA Milestones Original FA Schedule in Scope of Work Actual Schedule Start Date End Date Start Date End Date Environmental Clearance Design Bid & Award Design Right -of -Way Acquisition Construction Bid & Award Ground Breaking Event Construction Ribbon Cutting Event FTotal Project Duration (Months) 2. PROJECT COMPLETION A. Based on the comparison of the original and actual project milestone schedules above, project is (select only one) : FlOn schedule per original FA schedule nBetween 12-24 months behind original schedule Less than 12 months behind original schedule F]More than 24 months behind original schedule B. Was the project design started within 6 months of the date originally stated in the FA? n Yes n No n Not Applicable C. Was a construction contract or capital purchase executed within 9 months after completion of design / specifications? ❑ Yes ❑ No El Not Applicable Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report 3. TASKS / MILESTONES ACCOMPLISHED List tasks or milestones accomplished and progress made this quarter. 4. PROJECT DELAY If project is delayed, describe reasons for delay (this quarter). Pay particular attention to schedule delays. If delay is for the same reason as mentioned in previous quarters, please indicate by writing "Same as Previous Quarter". S. ACTION ITEMS TO RESOLVE DELAY If the project is delayed (as described in #4), include action items that have been, or will be, undertaken to resolve the delay. Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report SECTION 4: ITEMIZED LISTING OF EXPENSES AND CHARGES THIS QUARTER All expenses and charges must be itemized and listed below. Each item listed must be verifiable by an invoice and/or other proper documentation. The total amounts shown here must be equal to this quarter's expenditures listed on page 1 of this report. All expenses and charges must be reflective of the approved budget and rates as shown in the FA Attachment B, Scope of Work. Use additional pages if needed. Note: All receipts, invoices, and time sheets, attached and included with this Expense Report must be listed and shown under the Invoice Number column of the Itemized Listing (above). Invoice Payment Information: LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. ACH Payments require that you complete an ACH Request Form and fax it to Accounts Payable at 213-922-6107. ACH Request Forms can be found at www.metro.net/callforprojects. Written exception requests for Check Payments should be completed and faxed to Accounts Payable at 213-922-6107. I certify that I am the responsible Project Manager or fiscal officer and representative of and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the information stated in this report is true and correct. Signature Name Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report ATTACHMENT E - FTIP PROJECT SHEET Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($000) TIP ID LA9918872 Implementing Agency Rosemead, City of Project Description: Improve I-10 WB on- & off -ramps at Walnut Grove Avenue. Realign SB RT lane from Walnut Grove Ave to SCAG RTP PrWct #: Study:N/A Is Model: Model #: -10 WB on-ramp; install a realigned 1-10 WB on -and off -ramp at Walnut Grove Ave; realign striping at north and south PM: Ali Cayir - (714)883-8677 approached of Walnut Grove Ave at realigned 1-10 WB ramps; install new traffic signal at realigned 1-10 WB ramps. LS: N LS GROUP#: Conformity Category: System :State Hwy Route :10 Postmile: 26.3 to 26.3 Distance: 0 Phase: No Project Activity Completion Date 11/01/2025 Lane # Extd: Lane # Prop: Impry Desc: Air Basin: SCAB Envir Doc: INITIAL STUDY- CEQA - 02/28/2022 Toll Rate: Toll Colc Lac: Toll Method: Hov acs eg loc: Uza: Las Angeles -Long Sub -Area: Sub -Region: San Gabriel Valley 0.00 Beach -Santa Ana COG CTIPS ID: EA #: PPNO: Proqram Code: RAMPS 7 MODIFY/LANE ADDITIONS Stop Loc: PHASE PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 BEYOND FROG TOTAL MR20H - Measure R 20% Highway PE $150 $350 $200 $175 0 $875 RW $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 CON $0 $0 $0 $25 $5,1 DO $5.125 - General Comment: -Modeling Comment: -TCM Comment: -Amendment Comment: -CMP Comment: - Narrative: TOTAL PE: $875 TOTAL RW: $0 TOTAL CON: $5,125 TOTAL PROGRAMMED: $6,000 Change reason:NEW PROJECT Total Project Cost $6,000 Page 1 Tuesday, April 21, 2020 FTIP #: LA9918872 ATTACHMENT F BOND REQUIREMENTS Project#: MR4.1.2.09 FA# 9200000000MR41209 The provisions of this Attachment F apply only if and to the extent some or all of the Funds are derived from LACMTA issued Bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes (collectively, the "Bonds"). GRANTEE acknowledges that some or all of the Funds may be derived from Bonds, the interest on which is tax-exempt for federal tax purposes or with respect to which LACMTA receives a Federal subsidy for a portion of the interest cost or the investor receives a tax credit. GRANTEE further acknowledges its understanding that the proceeds of the Bonds are subject to certain ongoing limitations relating to the use of the assets financed or provided with such proceeds ("Project Costs" or "Project Components") in the trade or business of any person or entity other than a governmental organization (any such use by a person or entity other than a governmental organization is referred to as "Private Use"). Private Use will include any sale, lease or other arrangement pursuant to which a nongovernmental person or entity receives a legal entitlement of a Project Component and also includes certain agreements pursuant to which a nongovernmental person will operate or manage a Project Component. Each quarterly invoice submitted by GRANTEE to reimburse prior expenditures (or to be received as an advance) shall provide information regarding the specific Project Costs or Project Components to which the Funds which pay that invoice will be allocated and whether there is or might be any Private Use associated with such Project Costs or Project Components. GRANTEE will, for the entire time over which LACMTA's Bonds or other debt remains outstanding, (1) notify and receive LACMTA' s approval prior to entering into any arrangement which will or might result in Private Use and (2) maintain records, including obtaining records from contractors and subcontractors as necessary, of all allocations of Funds to Project Costs or Project Components and any Private Use of such Project Costs or Project Components in sufficient detail to comply and establish compliance with Section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or similar code provision then in effect and applicable, as determined by the LACMTA in consultation with its bond counsel. GRANTEE will designate one or more persons that will be responsible for compliance with the obligations described in this Attachment F and notify LACMTA of such designations. Rev: 05.15.19 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment F Bond Requirements FTIP #: LA9918872 ATTACHMENT G SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS Project#: MR4.1.2.08 FA# 9200000000MR41208 With regards to Part II, Paragraph 7, the following shall also apply: a. Funds allocated for each SR -710 North Mobility Improvement Project [MIP] shall be on a one-time basis. LACMTA shall not fund any cost increase. Potential cost savings shall remain in the Corridor and shall be assigned to other projects consistent with the purpose of the program as determined by LACMTA. b. Grantee is responsible for all cost overruns incurred. Under no circumstances will the total amount of money that LACMTA reimburses the Grantee exceed the amount of Funds approved by LACMTA. c. LACMTA shall reimburse Grantee up to a maximum amount of $6,000,000 as specified for the Project subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. d. LACMTA shall transfer the Funds to the Grantee on a reimbursement basis only. No advance of Funds shall be allowed. 2. With regards to Part II, Paragraph 8.2, the following shall also apply: a. LACMTA shall not be obligated to program additional funds to the Project. 3. Grantee shall conduct Before and After Studies to evaluate and document the results of project implementation in terms of congestion relief and air quality improvements. a. Grantee shall maintain proper records of the existing conditions before and after each MIP to assess the performance of the completed MIP as well as the overall program. b. A copy of the Before and After Study shall be submitted to LACMTA within six months of completion of the project construction. Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions Attachment G Adaptive Traffic and Responsive Control Project Funding Agreement (FTIP) # LA9918886 FTIP #: LA9918886 MEASURE R FUNDING AGREEMENT HIGHWAY PROGRAM (General) Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 This Funding Agreement ("FA") is made and entered into effective as of September 1, 2020 ("Effective Date"), and is by and between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA") and City of Rosemead ("GRANTEE") for Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project (Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead), LACMTA Project ID# MR 4.3.2.19 and FTIP# LA9918886, (the "Project"). This Project is eligible for funding under Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan. WHEREAS, LACMTA adopted Ordinance #08-01, the Traffic Relief and Rail Expansion Ordinance, on July 24, 2008 (the "Ordinance"), which Ordinance was approved by the voters of Los Angeles County on November 4, 2008 as "Measure R" and became effective on January 2, 2009. WHEREAS, $780,000,000 in Measure R funds was identified in Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan for the 1-710 North Gap Closure (tunnel) Project (SR -710 North). WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board at its May 25, 2017 meeting, reallocated the remaining Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion, if consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR -710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. WHEREAS, the funding set forth herein is intended to fund the Project Approval/Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), and Construction of the Project. WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board, at its September 26, 2019 meeting, programmed $9,000,000, in Measure R Funds to GRANTEE for PAED, PS&E, and Construction subject to the terms and conditions contained in this FA; and WHEREAS, the Funds are currently programmed as follows: $300,000 in Measure R Funds in Fiscal Years (FY) FY 2020-21; $1,500,000 in FY 2021-22; $4,000,000 FY 2022-23; and $3,200,000 in FY 2023-24. The total designated for PAED, PS&E, and Construction of the Project is $9,000,000. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: The terms and conditions of this FA consist of the following and each is incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein: 1. Part I — Specific Terms of the FA 2. Part II —General Terms of the FA 3. Attachment A —Project Funding 4. Attachment B— Measure R Expenditure Plan Guidelines Rev: 02.20.2020 1 Measure R Funding Agreement— Highways — General FTI P #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 5. Attachment B-1— Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget 6. Attachment C — Scope of Work 7. Attachment D — Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines 8. Attachment D-1— intentionally omitted 9. Attachment D-2 —Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report 10. Attachment E — Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Sheet 11. Attachment F — Bond Requirements 12. Attachment G-1—SR-710 North Mobility Improvement Project (MIP) 13. Attachment G-2 — Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (Connect -IT) Consistency Self -Certification Policy Form 14. Attachment G-3 — Signal Synchronization, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and Transportation Technology Improvements 15. Any other attachments or documents referenced in the above documents In the event of a conflict, the Special Grant Conditions, if any, shall prevail over the Specific Terms of the FA and any attachments and the Specific Terms of the FA shall prevail over the General Terms of the FA. Rev: 02.20.2020 2 Measure R Funding Agreement— Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this FA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the dates indicated below: LACMTA: LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: Phillip A. Washington Chief Executive Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: RODRIGO CASTRO-SILVA Acting County Counsel Date: By; Date: 12131ZOM GRANTEE: CITY OF ROSEMEAD By: Gloria Molleda City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Rachel H. Richman City Attorney Date: Date: Rev: 02.20.2020 3 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 PART I SPECIFIC TERMS OF THE FA Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 1. Title of the Project (the "Project"): Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project (Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead) —Project Approval/Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), and Construction. LACMTA Project ID# MR4.3.2.19, FTIP# LA9918886. Grant Funds: 2.1 Programmed Funds for this Project consist of the following: Measure R Funds. 2.2 To the extent the Measure R Funds are available; LACMTA shall make to GRANTEE a grant of the Measure R funds in the amount of $9,000,000 (the "Fund") for the Project. LACMTA Board of Directors' action of September 26, 2019 granted the Measure R Funds for the Project. The Funds are programmed over 4 years for Fiscal Years (FY) FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22, FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. 3. This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter's expenditures. LACMTA will withhold five percent (5%) of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. 4. Attachment A the "Project Funding" documents all sources of funds programmed for the Project as approved by LACMTA. The Project Funding includes the total programmed funds for the Project, including the Funds programmed by LACMTA and, if any, the GRANTEE Funding Commitment of other sources of funding. The Project Funding also includes the fiscal years in which all the funds for the Project are programmed. The Funds are subject to adjustment by subsequent LACMTA Board Action. 5. Attachment B-1 is the Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget (the "Expenditure Plan"). It is the entire proposed cash flow, the Budget and financial plan for the Project, which includes the total sources of all funds programmed to the Project, including GRANTEE and other entity funding commitments, if any, for this Project as well as the fiscal year and quarters the Project funds are anticipated to be expended. GRANTEE shall update the Expenditure Plan annually, no later than December 31, and such update shall be submitted to LACMTA's Senior Executive Officer of Construction & Engineering in writing. If the LACMTA's Senior Executive Officer of Construction & Engineering concurs with such updated Expenditure Plan in writing, Attachment B-1 shall be replaced with the new Attachment B-1 setting forth the latest approved Expenditure Plan. Payments under this FA shall be consistent with Attachment B-1 as revised from time to time. Any change to the final milestone date must be made by a fully executed amendment to this FA. Rev: 02.20.2020 4 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 6. Attachment C is the "Scope of Work". The GRANTEE shall complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work. This Scope of Work shall include a detailed description of the Project and the work to be completed, including anticipated Project milestones and a schedule consistent with the lapsing policy in Part II, Section 9, and a description of the Project limits, if applicable. No later than December 31 of each year, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA if there are any changes to the final milestone date set forth in the schedule or any changes to the Scope of Work. If LACIVITA agrees to such changes, the parties shall memorialize such changes in an amendment to this FA. Work shall be delivered in accordance with the schedule and scope identified in this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing in an amendment to this FA. If GRANTEE fails to meet milestones or delivery of the Project, LACMTA will have the option to suspend or terminate the FA for default as described in Part II, Sections 2, 9, 10 and 11 herein below. To the extent interim milestone dates are not met but GRANTEE believes and can show documentation acceptable to LACMTA supporting GRANTEE'S ability to make up the time so as to not impact the final milestone date, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA of such changes in its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports and such interim milestone dates will automatically be amended to the latest interim milestone dates provided in the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports Attachment D-2. In no event can the final milestone date be amended by a Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. 7. No changes to this FA, including but not limited to the Funds, and any other source of funds from LACMTA in the Project Funding, Expenditure Plan or the Scope of Work shall be allowed without an amendment to the original FA, approved and signed by both parties. 8. Attachment D is the "Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines". GRANTEE shall complete the "Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report". The Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report are attached to this FA as Attachment DD=2 in accordance with Attachment D — Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines. 9. Attachment E, the "FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF)", is required to ensure that the Project is programmed correctly in the most up-to-date FTIP document. The FTIP PROJECTSHEET (PDF) can be found in ProgramMetro FTIP database under the reports section at http://Program.metro.net. All projects that receive funding through Measure R must be programmed into the FTIP, which includes locally funded regionally significant projects for information and air quality modeling purposes. GRANTEE shall review the Project in ProgramMetro each year and update or correct the Project information as necessary during a scheduled FTIP amendment or adoption. GRANTEE will be notified of amendments and adoptions to the FTIP via e-mail. Changes to the FTIP through ProgramMetro should be made as soon as possible after GRANTEE is aware of any changes to the Project, but no later than October 1 of the year the change or update is effective. Should GRANTEE fail to meet this date, it may affect GRANTEE's ability to access funding, delay the Project and may ultimately result in the Funds being lapsed. Rev: 02.20.2020 5 Measure R Funding Agreement—Highways— General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 10. LACMTA anticipates it may need to avail itself of lower cost bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes and/or Build America Bonds as defined in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 or similar types of bonds (collectively, the 'Bonds") to provide at least a portion of its funding commitments under this Agreement to GRANTEE. GRANTEE shall ensure that the expenditure of the Funds disbursed to GRANTEE does not jeopardize the tax -exemption of the interest, the Federal subsidy payment or the tax credit, as applicable, as specified in the Bond Requirements attached as Attachment F to this Agreement. GRANTEE agrees to provide LACMTA with progress reports, expenditure documentation, and any other documentation as reasonably requested by LACMTA and necessary for LACMTA to fulfill its responsibilities as the grantee or administrator or bond issuer of the Funds. With regard to LACMTA debt financing to provide any portion of the Funds, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable actions as may be requested of it by LACMTA's Project Manager for the Project, to assist LACMTA in demonstrating and maintaining over time, compliance with the relevant sections of the Federal Tax Code to maintain such bonds tax status. 11. GRANTEE shall comply with the "Special Grant Conditions" attached as Attachment G, if any. 12. No changes to the (i) Grant amount, (ii) Project Funding, (iii) the Scope of Work (except as provided herein), (iv) Final milestone date or (v) Special Grant Conditions, shall be allowed without a written amendment to this FA, approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee and GRANTEE. Modifications that do not materially affect the terms of this FA, such as redistributing Funds among existing budget line items or non -material schedule changes must be formally requested by GRANTEE and approved by LACMTA in writing. Non -material changes are those changes which do not affect the grant amount or its schedule, Project Funding, or the Scope of Work, including the Work schedule. 13. LACMTA's Address: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention: Shrota Sharma LACMTA Project Manager Mail Stop 99-18-2 Phone (213) 418-3058 E-mail sharmas@metro.net 14. GRANTEE's Address: Rev: 02.20.2020 6 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Christopher Daste Phone: (626) 569-2158 Email: cdaste@cityofrosemead.org Rev: 02.20.2020 7 Measure R Funding Agreement— Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 PART II GENERAL TERMS OF THE 1. TERM Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 The term of this FA shall commence on the Effective Date of this FA, and shall terminate upon the occurrence of all of the following, unless terminated earlier as provided herein: (i) the agreed upon Scope of Work has been completed; (ii) all LACMTA audit and reporting requirements have been satisfied; and (iii) the final disbursement of the Funds has been made to GRANTEE. All eligible Project expenses as defined in the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D), incurred after the FA Effective Date shall be reimbursed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing. 2. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION Should LACMTA determine there are insufficient Measure R Funds available for the Project, LACMTA may suspend or terminate this FA by giving written notice to GRANTEE at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of such suspension or termination. If a Project is suspended or terminated pursuant to this section, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE any costs incurred after that suspension or termination date, except those costs necessary to: (i) to return any facilities modified by the Project construction to a safe and operable state; and (ii) suspend or terminate the construction contractor's control over the Project. LACMTA's share of these costs will be consistent with the established funding percentages outlined in this FA. 3. INVOICE BY GRANTEE Unless otherwise stated in this FA, the Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report, with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre -approved by LACMTA, all as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA, shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA Project Manager at the email address shown in Part I and to LACMTA Accounts Payable Department as shown below. Submit invoice with supporting documentation to: ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@METRO.NET (preferable) or mail to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. 0. Box 512296 Los Angeles, CA 90051-0296 All invoice material must contain the following information: Re: LACMTA Project ID# MR4.3.2.19 and FA# 9200000000MR43219 Rev: 02.20.2020 8 Measure R Funding Agreement— Highways— General FTIP #: LA9918886 Shrota Sharma; Mail Stop 99-18-2 4. USE OF FUNDS Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 4.1 GRANTEE shall utilize the Funds to complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work and in accordance with the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines and the specifications for use for the transportation purposes described in the Ordinance. 4.2 Attachment C shall constitute the agreed upon Scope of Work between LACMTA and GRANTEE for the Project. The Funds, as granted under this FA, can only be used towards the completion of the Scope of Work detailed in Attachment C. 4.3 GRANTEE shall not use the Funds to substitute for any other funds or projects not specified in this FA. Further, GRANTEE shall not use the Funds for any expenses or activities above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (Attachment C) without an amendment to the FA approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his Designee. To the extent LACMTA provides GRANTEE with bond or commercial paper proceeds, such Funds may not be used to reimburse for any costs that jeopardize the tax exempt nature of such financings as reasonably determined by LACMTA and its bond counsel. 4.4 GRANTEE must use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner. If GRANTEE intends to use a consultant or contractor to implement all or part of the Project, LACMTA requires that such activities be procured in accordance with GRANTEE's contracting procedures and consistent with State law as appropriate. GRANTEE will also use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner when the Funds are used to pay "in-house" staff time. This effective use of funds provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. 4.5 GRANTEE'S employee, officers, councilmembers, board member, agents, or consultants (a "GRANTEE Party") are prohibited from participating in the selection, award, or administration of a third -party contract or sub -agreement supported by the Funds if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. A conflict of interest would include, without limitation, an organizational conflict of interest or when any of the following parties has a financial or other interest in any entity selected for award: (a) a GRANTEE Party (b) any member of a GRANTEE Party's immediate family, (c) a partner of a GRANTEE Party; (d) any organization that employs or intends to employ any of the above. This conflict of interest provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. 4.6 If a facility, equipment (such as computer hardware or software), vehicle or property, purchased or leased using the Funds, ceases to be used for the proper use as originally stated in the Scope of Work, or the Project is discontinued, any Funds expended for that purpose must be returned to LACMTA as follows: GRANTEE shall be required to repay the Funds in Rev: 02.20.2020 9 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 proportion to the useful life remaining and in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio. 4.7 If the Project requires the implementation of an Intelligent Transportation Systems ("ITS") project, GRANTEE shall ensure the Project is consistent with the Regional ITS Architecture. Attachment H-1, the Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (CONNECT -IT) Consistency Self -Certification Form, must be completed and signed for planned ITS projects and/or ITS projects that use local, state, or federal funds programmed or administered through LACMTA. Refer to www.laconnect-it.com to find information about the CONNECT -IT Service Packages. 4.8 If any parking facilities are designed and/or constructed using the Funds, GRANTEE shall coordinate with LACMTA parking program staff (see www.metro.net for staff listing) in the planning, design and management of the facility and shall ensure that its implementation is consistent with the LACMTA adopted parking policy. For the parking policy, see http://media.metro.net/proffiects studies/call projects/images/09%20Appendix%20D%20Parki np,%20Policy.pdf REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS Funds will be released on a reimbursement basis in accordance with invoices submitted in support of the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. Reimbursements via Automated Clearing House (ACH) will be made at no cost to GRANTEE. GRANTEE must complete the ACH form and submit such form to LACMTA before grant payments can be made. ACH Request Forms can be found at www.metro.net/proiects/caII proiects/call proiects-reference-documents/. . GRANTEE must provide detailed supporting documentation with its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any, must be spent in direct proportion to the Funds with each quarter's payment. 6. REPORTING AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS/PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS 6.1 GRANTEE shall submit the draft of Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report (Attachment D-2) within sixty (60) days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November, February, May and August to the LACMTA Project Manager for review and pre -approval of the applicable report. LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Grantee shall submit the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report no later than five (5) days after receipt of LACMTA's written approval. Should GRANTEE fail to submit either the draft or pre -approved reports within five (5) days of the due date and/or submit incomplete reports, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE until the completed required reports are Rev: 02.20.2020 10 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 received, reviewed, and approved. The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports shall include all appropriate documentation (such as contractor invoices, timesheets, receipts, etc.), and any changes to interim milestone dates that do not impact the final milestone date. All supporting documents must include a clear justification and explanation of their relevance to the Project. If no activity has occurred during a particular quarter, GRANTEE will still be required to submit the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports indicating no dollars were expended that quarter. If a request for reimbursement exceeds $500,000 in a single month, then GRANTEE can submit such an invoice once per month with supporting documentation. Expenses that are not invoiced to LACMTA Accounts Payable within ninety (90) days after the lapsing date specified in Part II, Section 9.1 below are not eligible for reimbursement. 6.2 GRANTEE shall submit the Project expenditure estimates for the subsequent fiscal year by February of each year. LACMTA will use the estimates to determine the Project budget for the upcoming fiscal year. 6.3 LACMTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct audits of the Project as deemed appropriate, such as financial and compliance audits, interim audits, pre -award audits, performance audits and final audits. LACMTA will commence a final audit within six months of receipt of acceptable final invoice, provided the Project is ready for final audit (meaning all costs and charges have been paid by GRANTEE and invoiced to LACMTA, and such costs, charges and invoices are properly documented and summarized in the accounting records to enable an audit without further explanation or summarization including actual indirect rates for the period covered by the FA period under review). GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain proper accounting procedures and cash management records and documents in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GRANTEE shall reimburse LACMTA for any expenditure not in compliance with the Scope of Work and/or not in compliance with other terms and conditions of this FA. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE's own expenditures submitted to LACMTA for this Project shall be in compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE's contractors, consultants and suppliers expenditures submitted to LACMTA through GRANTEE's Quarterly Progress/ Expenditures shall be in compliance with OMB Circular A-87 or Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 225 (whichever is applicable). Findings of the LACMTA audit are final. When LACMTA audit findings require GRANTEE to return monies to LACMTA, GRANTEE agrees to return the monies within thirty (30) days after the final audit is sent to GRANTEE. 6.4 GRANTEE's records shall include, without limitation, accounting records, written policies and procedures, contract files, original estimates, correspondence, change order files (including documentation covering negotiated settlements), invoices, and any other supporting evidence deemed necessary by LACMTA to substantiate charges related to the Project (all collectively referred to as "records"). Such records shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives to the extent deemed necessary by LACMTA to adequately permit evaluation of expended costs. Such Rev: 02.20.2020 11 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 records subject to audit shall also include, without limitation, those records deemed necessary by LACMTA to evaluate and verify, direct and indirect costs, (including overhead allocations) as they may apply to costs associated with the Project. These records must be retained by GRANTEE for three years following final payment under this Agreement. Payment of retention amounts shall not occur until after the LACMTA's final audit is completed. 6.5 GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to comply with the requirements of Part II, Section 5, paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 above. GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to cooperate fully in furnishing or in making available to LACMTA all records deemed necessary by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives related to the Project. 6.6 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall be afforded access to all GRANTEE'S records and its contractors related to the Project, and shall be allowed to interview any employee of GRANTEE and its contractors through final payment to the extent reasonably practicable. 6.7 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall have access to the offices of GRANTEE and its contractors, shall have access to all necessary records, including reproduction, at no charge to LACMTA, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.8 When business travel associated with the Project requires use of a vehicle, the mileage incurred shall be reimbursed at the mileage rates set by the Internal Revenue Service, as indicated in the United States General Services Administration Federal Travel Regulation, Privately Owned Vehicle Reimbursement Rates. 6.9 GRANTEE shall be responsible for ensuring all contractors/ subcontractors for the Project comply with the terms of the Ordinance. GRANTEE shall cooperate with LACMTA Management Audit Services Department such that LACMTA can meet its obligations under the Ordinance. 6.10 GRANTEE shall certify each invoice by reviewing all subcontractor costs and maintaining internal control to ensure that all expenditures are allocable, allowable and reasonable and in accordance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.11 GRANTEE shall also certify final costs of the Project to ensure all costs are in compliance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.12 In addition to LACMTA's other remedies as provided in this FA, LACMTA may withhold the Funds if the LACMTA audit has determined that GRANTEE failed to comply Rev: 02.20.2020 12 Measure R Funding Agreement— Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 with the Scope of Work (such as misusing Funds or failure to return Funds owed to LACMTA in accordance with LACMTA audit findings) and /or is severely out of compliance with other terms and conditions as defined by this FA, including the access to records provisions of Part II, Section 6. 7. GRANT This is a one-time only grant of the Measure R Funds subject to the terms and conditions agreed to herein. This grant does not imply nor obligate any future funding commitment on the part of l—WATOallifflA 8. SOURCES AND DISPOSITION OF FUNDS 8.1 The obligation for LACMTA to grant the Funds for the Project is subject to sufficient Funds being made available for the Project by the LACMTA Board of Directors. If such Funds are not made available as anticipated from Measure R Program revenues, LACMTA will have the right to adjust the cash flow accordingly until such funds become available. LACMTA shall have no obligation to provide any other funds for the Project, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by LACMTA. 8.2 GRANTEE shall fully fund and contribute the GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any is identified in the Project Funding (Attachment A), towards the cost of the Project. If the Funds identified in Attachment A are insufficient to complete the Project, GRANTEE agrees to secure and provide such additional non-LACMTA programmed funds necessary to complete the Project. 8.3 GRANTEE shall be responsible for any and all cost overruns for the Project pursuant to Section 8.2. 8.4 GRANTEE shall be eligible for the Funds up to the grant amount specified in Part I, Section 2 of this FA subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. Any Funds expended by GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of this FA shall not be reimbursed nor shall they be credited toward the GRANTEE Funding Commitment requirement, without the prior written consent of LACMTA. GRANTEE Funding Commitment dollars expended prior to the year the Funds are awarded shall be spent at GRANTEE's own risk, or as delineated in a Letter of No Prejudice executed by the prospective GRANTEE and LACMTA. 8.5 If GRANTEE receives outside funding for the Project in addition to the Funds identified in the Project Funding and the Expenditure Plan at the time this grant was awarded, this FA shall be amended to reflect such additional funding. If, at the time of final invoice or voucher, funding for the Project (including the Funds, GRANTEE Funding Commitment, and any additional funding) exceeds the actual Project costs, then the cost savings shall be applied in the same proportion as the sources of funds from each party to this FA as specified in the Project Funding Rev: 02.20.2020 13 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: M R4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 and both the Funds and GRANTEE Funding Commitment required for the Project shall be reduced accordingly. LACMTA shall have the right to use any cost savings associated with the Funds at its sole discretion, including, without limitation, programming the unused Funds to another project or to another grantee. If, at the time of final voucher, it is determined that GRANTEE has received Funds in excess of what GRANTEE should have received for the Project, GRANTEE shall return such overage to LACMTA within 30 days from final voucher. 9. TIMELY USE OF FUNDS / REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS 9.1 GRANTEE must demonstrate timely use of the Funds by: (i) Executing this FA within ninety (90) days of receiving formal transmittal of the FA from LACMTA, or by December 31 of the first Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, whichever date is later; and (ii) Beginning Project Design, Preliminary Engineering -(PE) within six (6) months from completion of environmental clearance, if appropriate. (iii) Executing Contracts for Construction or Capital purchase within twelve (12) months from the date of completion of design; and (iv) Delivering Work in accordance with schedule; changes to the schedule will require an Amendment to Attachment C to reflect updated milestone dates. Meeting the Project milestone due dates as agreed upon by the LACMTA and GRANTEE in Attachment C (Scope of Work) of this FA; and (v) Submitting the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA; and (vi) Expending the Funds granted under this FA for allowable costs within three years or 36 months July 1 of the Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, unless otherwise stated in this FA. All Funds programmed for FY 2020-21 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2023. All Funds programmed for FY 2021-22 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2024. All Funds programmed for FY 2022-23 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2025. All Funds programmed for FY 2023-24 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2026. 9.2 In the event that the timely use of the Funds is not demonstrated as described in Part II, Section 9.1 of this FA, the Project will be reevaluated by LACMTA and the Funds may be reprogrammed to another project by the LACMTA Board of Directors in accordance with the Ordinance. In the event that all the Funds are reprogrammed, this FA shall automatically terminate. Rev: 02.20.2020 14 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 10. DEFAULT Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 A Default under this FA is defined as any one or more of the following: (i) GRANTEE fails to comply with the terms and conditions contained herein; and/or (ii) GRANTEE fails to perform satisfactorily or make material changes, as determined by LACMTA at its sole discretion, to the Expenditure Plan, the Scope of Work, or the Project Funding without LACMTA's prior written consent or approval as provided herein. 11. REMEDIES 11.1 In the event of a Default by GRANTEE, LACMTA shall provide written notice of such Default to GRANTEE with a 30 -day period to cure the Default. In the event GRANTEE fails to cure the Default, or commit to cure the Default and commence the same within such 30 -day period to the satisfaction of LACMTA, LACMTA shall have the following remedies: (i) LACMTA may terminate this FA; (ii) LACMTA may make no further disbursements of Funds to GRANTEE; and/or (iii) LACMTA may recover from GRANTEE any Funds disbursed to GRANTEE as allowed by law or in equity. 11.2 Effective upon receipt of written notice of termination from LACMTA, GRANTEE shall not undertake any new work or obligation with respect to this FA unless so directed by LACMTA in writing. Any Funds expended after termination shall be the sole responsibility of GRANTEE. 11.3 The remedies described herein are non-exclusive. LACMTA shall have the right to enforce any and all rights and remedies herein or which may be now or hereafter available at law or in equity. 12. COMMUNICATIONS 12.1 GRANTEE shall ensure that all Communication Materials contain recognition of LACMTA's contribution to the Project as more particularly set forth in "Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines" available online at http://metro.net/partners-civic. The Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines may be changed from time to time during the course of this Agreement. GRANTEE shall be responsible for complying with the latest Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines during the term of this Agreement, unless otherwise specifically authorized in writing by the LACMTA Chief Communications Officer. 12.2 For purposes of this Agreement, "Communications Materials" include, but are not limited to, press events, public and external newsletters, printed materials, advertising, websites radio and public service announcements, electronic media, and construction site signage. A more detailed definition of "Communications Materials" is found in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines. Rev: 02.20.2020 15 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 12.3 The Metro logo is a trademarked item that shall be reproduced and displayed in accordance with specific graphic guidelines. The preferred logo lock-up for Funding Recipients to use is included in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines. 12.4 GRANTEE shall ensure that any subcontractor, including, but not limited to, public relations, public affairs, and/or marketing firms hired to produce Project Communications Materials for public and external purposes will comply with the requirements contained in this Section. 12.5 The LACIVITA Project Manager shall be responsible for monitoring GRANTEE's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Section. GRANTEE's failure to comply with the terms of this Section shall be deemed a default hereunder and LACMTA shall have all rights and remedies set forth herein. 13. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 13.1 This FA, along with its Attachments, constitutes the entire understanding between the parties, with respect to the subject matter herein. The FA shall not be amended, nor any provisions or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the parties who agreed to the original FA or the same level of authority. Adoption of revisions or supplements to the Guidelines shall cause such revisions or supplements to become incorporated automatically into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 13.2 GRANTEE is obligated to continue using the Project dedicated to the public transportation purposes for which the Project was initially approved. The Project right-of-way, the Project facilities constructed or reconstructed on the Project site, and/or Project property purchased, excluding construction easements and excess property (whose proportionate proceeds shall be distributed in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio), shall remain dedicated to public transportation use in the same proportion and scope and to the same extent as described in this FA. Equipment acquired as part of the Project, including office equipment, vehicles, shall be dedicated to that use for their full economic life cycle, including any extensions of that life cycle achieved by reconstruction, rehabilitation, or enhancements. 13.3 In the event that there is any legal court (e.g., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, or the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California) proceeding between the parties to enforce or interpret this FA, to protect or establish any rights or remedies hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees. 13.4 Neither LACMTA nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or committed to be done by GRANTEE under or in connection with any work performed by and or service provided by GRANTEE, its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors under this FA. GRANTEE Rev: 02.20.2020 16 Measure R Funding Agreement— Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000M R43219 shall fully indemnify, defend and hold LACMTA and its subsidiaries, and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any liability and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of risk of property, any environmental obligation, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of the Project, including without limitation: (i) use of the Funds by GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors; (ii) breach of GRANTEE's obligations under this FA; or (iii) any act or omission of GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors in the performance of the work or the provision of the services, in connection with the Project including, without limitation, the Scope of Work, described in this FA. 13.5 Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligation hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by unforeseen causes including acts of God, acts of a public enemy, and government acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the affected party. Each party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any such circumstances claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performance of any obligations under this FA. 13.6 GRANTEE shall comply with and ensure that work performed under this FA is done in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and procedural requirements including Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and the applicable requirements and regulations of LACMTA. GRANTEE acknowledges responsibility for obtaining copies of and complying with the terms of the most recent federal, state, or local laws and regulations, and LACMTA requirements including any amendments thereto. 13.7 GRANTEE agrees that the applicable requirements of this FA shall be included in every contract entered into by GRANTEE or its contractors relating to work performed under this FA and LACMTA shall have the right to review and audit such contracts. 13.8 GRANTEE shall not assign this FA, or any part thereof, without prior approVal of the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his designee. Any assignment by GRANTEE without said prior consent by LACMTA shall be void and unenforceable. 13.9 This FA shall be governed by California law. If any provision of this FA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. 13.10 The covenants and agreements of this FA shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. Rev: 02.20.2020 17 Measure R Funding Agreement— Highways — General FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 13.11 GRANTEE will advise LACMTA prior to any key Project staffing changes. Notice will be given to the parties at the address specified in Part I, unless otherwise notified in writing of change of address. 13.12 GRANTEE, in the performance of the work described in this FA, is not a contractor nor an agent or employee of LACMTA. GRANTEE attests to no organizational or personal conflicts of interest and agrees to notify LACMTA immediately in the event that a conflict, or the appearance thereof, arises. GRANTEE shall not represent itself as an agent or employee of LACMTA and shall have no powers to bind LACMTA in contract or otherwise. Rev: 02.20.2020 18 Measure R Funding Agreement— Highways — General u v 'o O 0 U M r. O P, N u H U H H Q al V TATA u .0 0 1.0 00 00 00 W F w p O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 Ri yy iy (A b4 b9 69 69 EA O 0 to w O o O 0 C> 0 0 0 CV 0 N O M iA M fA 0 0 0 O O O N iy 0 C> 0 � O N � N b9 O o0 o O yq kn EA 0 0 0 O EA N O o O O � O N {rVO O o M O 0 M W yj 69 b9 CoC bi to w w y A W4 w z Ho z W4 w w rn p w O a U A p 00 a a w [y y EnU O O W K94 O y W P.i FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 ATTACHMENT B MEASURE R EXPENDITURE PLAN GUIDELINES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY State Law Requires All Measure R Project and Program Sponsors to Submit an Expenditure Plan To be eligible to receive Measure R revenues, an agency sponsoring a capital project or program must by state law (AB 2321) submit an expenditure plan that is acceptable to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Pursuant to this law, LACMTA cannot release Measure R funds to capital project or program sponsors until an expenditure plan containing the following elements is submitted, reviewed and deemed satisfactory by LACMTA. LACMTA staff will request that an expenditure plan be submitted before malting a recommendation to the LACMTA Board to program funds to that project: o The estimated total cost for each project and program and/or each project or program activity; o Funds other than Measure R that the project or program sponsor anticipates will be expended on the projects and programs and/or each project or program activity; o The schedule during which the project sponsor anticipates funds will be available for each project and program and/or each project or program activity; and, o The expected completion dates for each project and program and/or project or program activity. Each of the above elements must be provided in enough detail to determine consistency with Measure R, the Long Range Transportation Plan for Los Angeles County, and the Los Angeles County Transportation Improvement Program (also a statutorily mandated function), as follows: o Project or program scope of work, including sufficient information to determine funding eligibility, including, but not limited to, the anticipated proportional use of current rail rights-of-way, state highways, and below -ground subways versus any other rights-of-way or above -ground work; o A current -year cost estimate breakdown of the major sub -elements of the project such as overhead, environmental and permit work, design and engineering, right-of-way, construction/installation (including maintenance facilities, rail yard, equipment and other major components), construction/installation support, interest costs, rolling stock, and other supporting components; o Any extraordinary project cost escalation issues, such as extraordinary commodity, right- of-way, surety, energy costs, etc.; o A specific and accurate description of the source, commitment, and anticipated annual availability of any federal, state, local, or private funding identified for the project if applicable including a 3% local funding contribution to rail projects if indicated in Measure R and necessary to meet project expenses, and if the source funds are in current or year -of -expenditure dollars; Rev: 11-1-14 1 FA Measure R Hwys Sub Attachment B Measure R Expenditure Guidelines FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 o An annual schedule, in current dollars, of anticipated costs by the cost estimate categories described above; and; o The expected completion by month and year of project or program completion. Below is an excerpt of AB 2321 (2008, Feuer), the state legislation that requires the expenditure plan. What AB 2321 (2008, Feuer) Says About the Expenditure Plan: Section b (3) B (f) Prior to submitting the ordinance to the voters, the MTA shall adopt an expenditure plan for the net revenues derived from the tax. The expenditure plan shall include, in addition to otherprojects and programs identified by the MTA, the specified projects and programs listed in paragraph (3) ofsubdivision (b), the estimated total cost for each project and program, funds other than the taxrevenues that the MTA anticipates will he expended on the projects and programs, and the schedule during which the MTA anticipates funds will be available for each project and program. The MTA shall also identify in its expenditure plan the expected completion dates for each project described in subparagraph (A) ofparagraph (3) of subdivision (b). To be eligible to receive revenues derived from the tax, an agency sponsoring a capital project or capital program shall submit to to MTA an expenditure plan for its project or program containing the same elements as the expenditure plan that MTA is required by this subdivision to prepare. (kJ No later than 365 days prior to the adoption ofan amendment described in paragraph (1) to an expenditure plan adopted pursuant to subdivision (1), including, hut not limited to, the expenditure plan adopted by the MTA board as 'AttachmentA "in Ordinance #08-01 adopted by the board on July 24, 2008, and in addition to any other notice requirements in the proposing ordinance, the board shall notify the Members ofthe Legislature representing the County ofLos Angeles ofall ofthe following - (1) A description ofthe proposed amendments to the adopted expenditure plan that would do any ofthe following. (A) Affect the amount ofnet revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to this act that is proposed to be expended on a capital project orprojects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (B) Affect the schedule for the availability offunds proposed to be expended on a capital project orprojects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (C) Affect the schedule for the estimated or expected completion date ofa capital project or projects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (2) The reason for the proposed amendment. (3) The estimated impact the proposed amendment will have on the schedule, cost, scope, or timely availability offunding for the capital project orprojects contained in the adopted expenditure plan. Rev: 11-1-14 2 FA Measure R Hwys Sub Attachment B Measure R Expenditure Guidelines ATTACHMENT B-1 - EXPENDITURE PLAN COST & CASH FLOW BUDGET Measure R Program - Funding Agreement Projects - FA# 9200000000MR43219 Project Title: Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project (Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead) Project#: MR4.3.2.19 PROGRAMMED SOURCES OF FUNDS SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2020.21 Qtr FY 2020.21 tr2 FY 2020.21 tr3 FY 2020.21 tr4 FY 2021-22 tri FY 2021.22 1 tr2 FY 2021.22 1 tri FY 2021-22 tr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $500 $2,500 $5,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $83,000 PS&E $25,000 $25,000 $100,000 $117,000 $400,000 $300,000 $325,000 $1,292,000 RW Support $0 Const. Support $25,000 $75,000 $75,000 $175,000 RW $0 Construction $250,000 $250,000 Total MEASURE R $25,500 $27,500 $105,000 $142,000 $425,000 $350,000 $400,000 $325,000 $1,800,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $25,500 $27,500 $105,000 $$142,000 $425,000 $35o,000 $400,000 $325,000 $$1,800,000 A S Sf'yb' f $�1 $05;�00 '4�Gx * d��o��SQr 12 Q1i9QQ0� �, gi% SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2022,23 Qtr 1 FY 2022.23 Qtr 2 FY 2022.23 Qtr 3 FY 2022.23 Qtr 4 FY 2023-24 Qtr 1 FY 2023-24 Qtr 2 FY 2023.24 Qtir 3 FY 2023.24 Qtr 4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $0 PS&E $o RW Support $0 Const. Support $50,000 $200,000 $200,000 $250,000 $150,000 $150,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,200,000 RW $0 Construction $200,000 1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,100,000 $850,000 $850,000 $500,000 $500,000 1 $6,000,000 Total MEASURER 1 $250,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,350,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $600,000 $600,000 $7,200,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $250,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,350,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $600,000 $600,000 $7,200,000 a �, p,p g. t J2,.. �l�Qa 4'124QQ�V4 7�1}�QQf�Q t `C SUMMARY OF ALL FUNDS PAED $500 $2,500 55,000 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 $o $0 1 $83,000 PS&E 1 $25,000 $25,000 1 $100,000 1 $117,000 1 $400,000 1 $300,000 $325,000 $0 1 $1,292,000 RW Support $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 Const, Support $50,000 1 $200,000 1 $200,000 1 $250,000 1 $150,000 1 $175,000 1 $175,000 1 $175,000 1 $1,375,000 RW $o $0 1 $0 $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Construction $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 1 $1,100,000 1 $850,000 1 $850,000 $500,000 1 $750,000 $6,250,000 TOTAL MILESTONES $275,500 1 $1,227,500 1 $1305,000 1 $1,492,000 $1,425 000 $1,350,000 $1,000,000 1 $925,00 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS $275,5oo $1,227,5oo $1,305,000 $1,492,000 $1,425,000 $1,350,000 $1,000,000 $925,000 $9,000,000 SUM NON-LACMTA FUNDS $0 $o $o $o $0 $o $0 $o $0 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $275,500 $1,227,500 $1,305,000 $1,492,000 $1,425,000 $1,350,000 $1,000,000 $925,000 $9,000,000 FTIP #: LA9918886 ATTACHMENT C SCOPE OF WORK Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 PROJECT TITLE: Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project (Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead) PROJECT LOCATION: The project is located on the following intersections in the City of Rosemead, in the San Gabriel Valley subregion. Along Garvey Avenue at the following signalized intersections: 1. Garvey Avenue/New Avenue 2. Garvey Avenue/Jackson Avenue 3. Garvey Avenue/Del Mar Avenue 4. Garvey Avenue/Kelburn Avenue 5. Garvey Avenue/San Gabriel Boulevard (included in San Gabriel Boulevard) 6. Garvey Avenue/Delta Avenue 7. Garvey Avenue/Walnut Grove Avenue (included in Walnut Grove Avenue) 8. Garvey Avenue/Muscatel Avenue 9. Garvey Avenue/Rosemead Place 10. Garvey Avenue/Garvey Community Center 11. Garvey Avenue/Lee Avenue Valley Boulevard at the following signalized intersections: 1. Valley Boulevard/Walnut Grove Avenue (included in Walnut Grove Avenue) 2. Valley Boulevard/Muscatel Avenue 3. Valley Boulevard/Ivar Avenue 4. Valley Boulevard/Rosemead Boulevard (included in Rosemead Boulevard) 5. Valley Boulevard/Hart Avenue 6. Valley Boulevard/Mission Drive 7. Valley Boulevard/Rio Hondo Avenue San Gabriel Boulevard at the following signalized intersections: 1. San Gabriel Boulevard/Hellman Avenue 2. San Gabriel Boulevard/Emerson Place 3. San Gabriel Boulevard/Garvey Avenue 4. San Gabriel Boulevard/Klingerman Street 5. San Gabriel Boulevard/Graves Avenue 6. San Gabriel Boulevard/Potrero Grande -Rush Street Walnut Grove Avenue at the following signalized intersections: 1. Walnut Grove Avenue/Mission Drive 2. Walnut Grove Avenue/Edmond Drive 3. Walnut Grove Avenue/Valley Boulevard 4. Walnut Grove Avenue/Marshall Street 5. Walnut Grove Avenue/Hellman Avenue Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 6. Walnut Grove Avenue/Hellman-I-10 EB On and Off Ramp Access Road 7. Walnut Grove Avenue/Garvey Avenue 8. Walnut Grove Avenue/Fern Avenue 9. Walnut Grove Avenue/Klingerman Street 10. Walnut Grove Avenue/Edison Way 11. Walnut Grove Avenue/Rush Street 12. Walnut Grove Avenue/Wal Mart 13. Walnut Grove Avenue/Landis View Lane 14. Walnut Grove Avenue/San Gabriel Boulevard 15. San Gabriel Boulevard/60 Fwy WB On and Off Ramp Access Road Rosemead Boulevard at the following signalized intersections: 1. Rosemead Boulevard/Lower Azusa Road 2. Rosemead Boulevard/Mission Drive 3. Rosemead Boulevard/Valley Boulevard 4. Rosemead Boulevard/Marshall Street 5. Rosemead Boulevard/Glendon Way PROJECT LIMITS: This project limits are at the intersections of above signalized locations, including any necessary improvements on the approaches required by signal design. NEXUS TO SR -710 OPERATIONAL AND MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS: The Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project (Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead) is an eligible SR -710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement approved by the Metro Board of Directors on September 26, 2019. The project contributes to mobility and operational benefits in the SR -710 corridor between I-10 and I-210 consistent with the Purpose and Need of the 710 Gap Closure project. The project will upgrade the traffic signal system, and other components at major north -south and east -west corridors to improve the traffic operations and mobility in the City. These improvements will be planned and developed in conjunction with adjacent cities to ensure that traffic operations are coordinated through major corridors within the SR -710 area. PROJECT BACKGROUND: The project was identified, and was awarded LACMTA Measure R funding, as part of a broader package of projects Imown as the SR -710 Mobility Improvement Projects (MIPS). The SR -710 MIPS are the result of reallocated Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion. These projects are consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR - 710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. The project will improve traffic progression along these corridors in the City. The corridors currently operate at level of service (LOS) D, and are forecast to operate at LOS E and F by 2040 without improvements. These corridors are primary arterials which carry significant regional and local traffic. Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 PROJECT BUDGET: COMPONENT AMOUNT PA/ED $83,000 PS&E $1,292,000 Construction Support $1,375,000 Construction Capital $6.250.000 Total Budget $9,000,000 SCOPE: The project will replace as needed the existing traffic signal controllers with 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and firmware at signalized intersections along Garvey Avenue, Valley Boulevard, San Gabriel Boulevard, Walnut Grove Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard and provide fiber optic cable connectivity to all of these traffic signal intersections. The traffic signal controller manufacturer and firmware will be determined during the design phase and may include adaptive traffic control system or traffic responsive features, as it is appropriate and feasible for this project. The main purpose of the project is to improve traffic operations, mobility, and safety for the major arterials that run through the City. The design and implementation of traffic elements and actual locations will be determined during the design phase, which will include the following improvements: • Replace traffic signal controllers to 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers, and cabinets as required (TBD during Design). • Install fiber optic interconnect along major arterials (new conduits & cables) to improve traffic operations (subject to the design phase). • Install Ethernet switches and fiber optic communications equipment at existing controller cabinets. • Install communication hubs. • Install vehicle detection (e.g. loop, video) systems (TBD during Design). • Design and implement CCTV camera system (TBD during Design). • Update traffic signal timing and traffic signal synchronization to provide optimization of traffic flow for the AM and PM peals hours. • Design and implement a new central traffic signal management system (software and communication equipment) to monitor and control all of the signalized intersections within the City. At the completion of the design phase, the City shall inform the Metro Project Manager of the number of controllers and equipment needed to upgrade the traffic signal system, and the type of traffic control system they will deploy. In addition, the City shall coordinate the system design through Metro staff and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to coordinate with other Metro -funded traffic signal control projects in the immediate and surrounding areas and allow communication with the County of Los Angeles Information Exchange Network (IEN). DESIGN: I. Preliminary Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 A. Conduct field visits of the project area to identify design issues. Record existing site conditions in photographs and/or video. B. Conduct survey of the project area, establishing horizontal and vertical control for the project as necessary. C. Identify and coordinate with all utilities in the project area to facilitate the final design of the Project. D. Verify if a geotechnical survey will be necessary. If yes, conduct geotechnical investigations as necessary. E. Verify if right-of-way (R/W) acquisitions and/or vacations will be necessary. At this point all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. F. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and establish required environmental, review, approval and permitting process. G. Prepare construction cost estimate. II. Environmental Analysis It is anticipated this project will be either an exempt project or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Prepare Initial Study (IS), consistent with CEQA Guidelines. B. If IS results in any impacts, prepare MND or any other applicable environmental document as necessary. C. Prepare the Draft IS and Draft MND for public circulation as necessary, respond to questions and comments, and finalize the environmental process. D. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W for required environmental review and approval. III. Final Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Prepare plans for the required improvements, consistent with City and/or Caltrans format. B. Assist the City for any Community Information Workshop if necessary. C. Prepare construction specifications. D. Prepare an engineer's construction cost estimate based on the itemized quantity take -off from the contract documents. E. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and obtain required approval and permits. F. Complete Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) Bid Package. IV. Project Management Grantee expects to provide overall project and program management, funding management through its in-house staff, and consultant. RIGHT-OF-WAY: At this point, all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: I.A9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 CONSTRUCTION: The construction contract will be bid out per Public Contract Code and City requirements. Grantee expects to provide construction management, inspection, contract administration, funding management through its in-house staff and consultant. Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 MILESTONES: The implementation schedule for this project will be as follows: Rev: 05.03.19 6 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work START DATE COMPLETION DATE SOLICITATION BID PROPOSAL 7/20 2/21 Develop Solicitation Package 7/20 9/20 RFP Advertisement 9/20 10/20 Contract Award 12/20 1/21 Fully Executed Contract 1/21 2/21 PLANNING 7/20 6/21 Review and Data Collection 2/21 4/21 Prepare Design Criteria/Requirements, including coordination with LACO for regional system compatibility and integration 4/21 6/21 PA&ED 1/21 12/21 Prepare IS, if applicable MND, finalize environmental approval 1/21 12/21 PS&E 4/21 2/22 Preliminary PS&E 4/21 8/21 Final PS&E 8/21 2/22 CONSTRUCTION 2/22 6/24 PS&E Bid Package Advertisement 2/22 3/22 Contract Award 3/22 4/22 Construction 5/22 6/24 System Integration and Testing 3/24 6/24 Rev: 05.03.19 6 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LA9918886 Almansor Park ATTACHMENT C — Location Map Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 441, o" GROsAnead 3; A IcOwL)i, Ave Q, '�41VIJJ AVA -it St South San Gabriel Sit Whittier Narrows Recreation Area Rev: 05.03.19 7 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Woric FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 FA ATTACHMENT D PROJECT REPORTING & EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES REPORTING PROCEDURES Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report (Attachment D2) are required for all projects. The GRANTEE shall be subject to and comply with all applicable requirements of the funding agency regarding project -reporting requirements. In addition, GRANTEE will submit the Quarterly Expenditure Report to the LACMTA, after receiving LACMTA Project Manager's acceptance of the draft report, at ACCOUNTSPAYABLEcWMETRO.NET or by mail to Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Accounts Payable, P. O. Box 512296, Los Angeles, California 90051-0296. Please note that letters or other forms of documentation may not be substituted for this form. • The Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report covers all activities related to the project and lists all costs incurred. It is essential that GRANTEE provides complete and adequate response to all the questions. The expenses listed must be supported by appropriate documentation with a clear explanation of the purpose and relevance of each expense to the project. • In cases where there are no activities to report, or problems causing delays, clear explanation, including actions to remedy the situation, must be provided. • GRANTEE is required to track and report on the project schedule. LACMTA will monitor the timely use of funds and delivery of projects. Project delay, if any, must be reported each quarter. • The draft Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report is due to the LACMTA as soon as possible after the close of each quarter, but no later than the following dates for each fiscal year: Quarter Report Due Date July —September November 30 October - December February 28 January - March May 31 April - June August 31 LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Expenditure Report within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Rev: 02.13.2020 FA Local Attachment C Admin Guidelines FTIP #: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 Upon completion of the Project a final report that includes project's final evaluation must be submitted. EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES • Any activity or expense charged above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (FA Attachment C) is considered ineligible and will not be reimbursed by the LACMTA unless prior written authorization has been granted by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee. • Any expense charged to the grant must be clearly and directly related to the project. Administrative cost is the ongoing expense incurred by the GRANTEE for the duration of the project and for the direct benefit of the project as specified in the Scope of Work (Attachment C). Examples of administrative costs are personnel, office supplies, and equipment. As a condition for eligibility, all costs must be necessary for maintaining, monitoring, coordinating, reporting and budgeting of the project. Additionally, expenses must be reasonable and appropriate to the activities related to the project. • LACMTA is not responsible for, and will not reimburse any costs incurred by the GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of the FA, unless written authorization has been granted by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee. DEFINITIONS • Allowable Cost: To be allowable, costs must be reasonable, recognized as ordinary and necessary, consistent with established practices of the organization, and consistent with industry standard of pay for work classification. • Excessive Cost: Any expense deemed "excessive" by LACMTA staff would be adjusted to reflect a "reasonable and customary" level. For detail definition of "reasonable cost", please refer to the Federal Register OMB Circulars A-87 Cost Principals for State and Local Governments; and A-122 Cost Principals for Nonprofit Organizations. • Ineligible Expenditures: Any activity or expense charged above and beyond the approved Scope of Work is considered ineligible. Rev: 02.13.2020 FA Local Attachment C Admin Guidelines LACMTA FA MEASURE R ATTACHMENT D-2 QUARTERLY PROGRESS / EXPENSE REPORT GRANTEES ARE REQUESTED TO EMAIL THIS REPORT TO ACCOU NTSPAYAB LE0 M ETRO. N ET or submit by mail to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. O. Box 512296 Los Angeles, California 90051-0296 after the close of each quarter, but no later than November 30, February 28, May 31 and August 31. Please note that letters or other forms of documentation may not be substituted for this form. Refer to the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D) for further information. Grantee To Complete Invoice # Invoice Date FA# Quarterly Report # SECTIONQUARTERLY EXPENSE REPORT Please itemize grant -related charges for this Quarter on Page 5 of this report and include totals in this Section. Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report LACMTA Measure R Grant $ Project Quarter Expenditure This Quarter Expenditure Retention Amount Net Invoice Amount (Less Retention) Funds Expended to Date (Include this Quarter) Total Project Budget % of Project Budget Expended to Date Balance Remaining Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report SECTION 2: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE: FA #: QUARTERLY REPORT SUBMITTED FOR: Fiscal Year: Quarter: DATE SUBMITTED: LACMTA MODAL CATEGORY: F2014-2015 2015-2016 2017-2018 2018-2019 FQl: Jul - Sep F -]Q2: Oct - Dec F_1Q3: Jan - Mar F-IQ4: Apr - Jun n RSTI ❑ Pedestrian nTDM ❑ Bicycle Transit Name: LACMTA Project Manager Phone Number: E-mail: Project Sponsor Contact / Project Manager Contact Name: lob Title: Mailing Address: Phone Number: E-mail: 2016-2017 ❑ 2019-2020 Signal Synchronization ❑ Goods Movement Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report 1. DELIVERABLES & MILESTONES List all deliverables and milestones as stated in the FA, with start and end dates Calculate the total project duration. DO NOT CHANGE THE ORIGINAL FA MILESTONE STARTAND END DATES SHOWN INTHE2ND AND 3 ' COL LIMNS BELOW. Grantees must make every effort to accuratelyportray milestone dates in the original FA Scope of Work, since this will provide the basis for calculating anyproject delay. If milestone startand/or end dates change f om those stated in the Original FA Scope of Work, indicate the new dates under Actual Schedule below and re -calculate the project duration. However, this does not change the original milestones in your FA. PER YOUR FA AGREEMENT, ANY CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE MUST BE FORMALLYSUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER TO LACMTA FOR WRITTEN CONCURRENCE. FA Milestones Original FA Schedule in Scope of Work Actual. Schedule Start Date End Date Start Date End Date Environmental Clearance Design Bid & Award Design Right -of -Way Acquisition Construction Bid & Award Ground Breaking Event Construction Ribbon Cutting Event Total Project Duration (Months) 2. PROJECT COMPLETION A. Based on the comparison of the original and actual project milestone schedules above, project is (select only one) : 1-1Onschedule per original FA schedule F]Between 12-24 months behind original schedule ElLess than 12 months behind original schedule More than 24 months behind original schedule B. Was the project design started within 6 months of the date originally stated in the FA? Yes F-1 No F] Not Applicable C. Was a construction contract or capital purchase executed within 9 months after completion of design / specifications? F] Yes F-] No F-1 Not Applicable Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report 3. TASKS / MILESTONES ACCOMPLISHED List tasks or milestones accomplished and progress made this quarter. 4. PROJECT DELAY If project is delayed, describe reasons for delay (this quarter). Pay particular attention to schedule delays. If delay is for the same reason as mentioned in previous quarters, please indicate by writing "Same as Previous Quarter". 5. ACTION ITEMS TO RESOLVE DELAY If the project is delayed (as described in #4), include action items that have been, or will be, undertaken to resolve the delay. Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report All expenses and charges must be itemized and listed below. Each item listed must be verifiable by an invoice and/or other proper documentation. The total amounts shown here must be equal to this quarter's expenditures listed on page 1 of this report. All expenses and charges must be reflective of the approved budget and rates as shown in the FA Attachment B, Scope of Work. Use additional pages if needed. Note: All receipts, invoices, and time sheets, attached and included with this Expense Report must be listed and shown under the Invoice Number column of the Itemized Listing (above). Invoice Payment Information: LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. ACH Payments require that you complete an ACH Request Form and fax it to Accounts Payable at 213-922-6107. ACH Request Forms can be found at www.metro.net/callforprojects. Written exception requests for Check Payments should be completed and faxed to Accounts Payable at 213-922-6107. I certify that I am the responsible Project Manager or fiscal officer and representative of and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the information stated in this report is true and correct. Signature Name Title Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report Attachment E Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($000) Project Description: Install adaptive traffic signal control (ATSC) system, including necessary signal system upgrades for SCAG RTP Project #: Study:N/A Is Model: Model #: compliance with current standards at 39 signalized locations along Garvey Ave (9 intersections - W to E city limits), Valley Blvd PM: Ali Cayir - (714)883-8677 (7 intersections - W to E city limits), San Gabriel Blvd (6 intersections N to S city limits), Walnut Grove Ave (16 intersections - N to S city limits), and Rosemead Blvd (5 intersections - N to S city limits). LS: N LS GROUP#: Conformity Category: System :Local Hwy Route: Postmile: Distance: Phase: No Project Activity Completion Date 06/30/2024 Lane # Extd: Lane # Prop: Impry Desc: Air Basin: SCAB Envir Doc: INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION - CEQA -12/31/2021 Toll Rate: Tall Colc Loc: Toll Method: Hov acs eg loc: Uza: Los Angeles -Long Sub -Area: Sub -Region: San Gabriel Valley 0.00 Beach -Santa Ana COG . ..... ............... ... ... ......... CTIPSID: EAM PPNO: Proqram Code: ITS02 - SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION Stop Loc: PHASE PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 BEYOND PROG TOTAL MR20H - Measure R 20% Highway PE $300 $1,075 $0 10 $1,375 .....__............................._.... _.....__....................._..--_................._.........._—.-_............................_._.__......_._ ......... __......... _.,.................................__._............................._._..._........ RW _........_..............................._......................__...__._.........----...._ $0 $0 $0 ............._..................__...__. $0 ­_­.._._...­ $0 ...... ---__.._._................ __...... _...... __........ .... _._-___ .............. _.......... _.__.............................. ....... ... _............. ._._....... CON .._......................... ..... $0 _............. --... $425 $4,000 ....... _.... --......... ............... ......_ $3,200 $7,625 $1,500 -- - $9,000 TOTAL PE: $1,375 TOTAL RW: $0 TOTAL CON: $7,625 TOTAL PROGRAMMED: $9,000 - General Comment: - Modeling Comment: - TCM Comment: - Amendment Comment: - CMP Comment: - Narrative: ProgressLast Revised Amendment 19-23 - In Change reason:NEW PROJECT Total Project Cost $9,000 Page 1 Wednesday, May 6, 2020 FTIP #: LA9918886 ATTACHMENT F BOND REQUIREMENTS Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 The provisions of this Attachment F apply only if and to the extent some or all of the Funds are derived from LACMTA issued Bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes (collectively, the "Bonds"). GRANTEE acknowledges that some or all of the Funds may be derived from Bonds, the interest on which is tax-exempt for federal tax purposes or with respect to which LACMTA receives a Federal subsidy for a portion of the interest cost or the investor receives a tax credit. GRANTEE further acknowledges its understanding that the proceeds of the Bonds are subject to certain ongoing limitations relating to the use of the assets financed or provided with such proceeds ("Project Costs" or "Project Components") in the trade or business of any person or entity other than a governmental organization (any such use by a person or entity other than a governmental organization is referred to as "Private Use"). Private Use will include any sale, lease or other arrangement pursuant to which a nongovernmental person or entity receives a legal entitlement of a Project Component and also includes certain agreements pursuant to which a nongovernmental person will operate or manage a Project Component. Each quarterly invoice submitted by GRANTEE to reimburse prior expenditures (or to be received as an advance) shall provide information regarding the specific Project Costs or Project Components to which the Funds which pay that invoice will be allocated and whether there is or might be any Private Use associated with such Project Costs or Project Components. GRANTEE will, for the entire time over which LACMTA's Bonds or other debt remains outstanding, (1) notify and receive LACMTA' s approval prior to entering into any arrangement which will or might result in Private Use and (2) maintain records, including obtaining records from contractors and subcontractors as necessary, of all allocations of Funds to Project Costs or Project Components and any Private Use of such Project Costs or Project Components in sufficient detail to comply and establish compliance with Section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or similar code provision then in effect and applicable, as determined by the LACMTA in consultation with its bond counsel. GRANTEE will designate one or more persons that will be responsible for compliance with the obligations described in this Attachment F and notify LACMTA of such designations. Rev: 05.15.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment F Bond Requirements FTIP #: LA9918886 ATTACHMENT G-1 SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 1. With regards to Part II, Paragraph 7, the following shall also apply: a. Funds allocated for each SR -710 North Mobility Improvement Project [MIP] shall be on a one-time basis. LACMTA shall not fund any cost increase. Potential cost savings shall remain in the Corridor and shall be assigned to other projects consistent with the purpose of the program as determined by LACMTA. b. Grantee is responsible for all cost overruns incurred. Under no circumstances will the total amount of money that LACMTA reimburses the Grantee exceed the amount of Funds approved by LACMTA. c. LACMTA shall reimburse Grantee up to a maximum amount of $9,000,000 as specified for the Project subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. d. LACMTA shall transfer the Funds to the Grantee on a reimbursement basis only. No advance of Funds shall be allowed. 2. With regards to Part II, Paragraph 8.2, the following shall also apply: a. LACMTA shall not be obligated to program additional funds to the Project. 3. Grantee shall conduct Before and After Studies to evaluate and document the results of project implementation in terms of congestion relief and air quality improvements. a. Grantee shall maintain proper records of the existing conditions before and after each MIP to assess the performance of the completed MIP as well as the overall program. b. A copy of the Before and After Study shall be submitted to LACMTA within six months of completion of the project construction. Measure R Funding Agreement -Highways FTIP#: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000-MR43219 ATTACHMENT G-2 SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE (CONNECT -IT) CONSISTENCY SELF -CERTIFICATION POLICY FORM This Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (CONNECT -IT) consistency self - certification form should be completed and executed for all ITS Projects or Projects with ITS elements. The form should be sent to LACMTA for any planned ITS projects or proposed funding involving Local, State or Federal funds programmed or administered through the LACMTA. 1. Project Title: Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project (Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead) 2. Name of Sponsoring Agency: City of Rosemead 3. Contact Name: Christopher Daste, Director of Public Works 4. Contact Phone: (626) 569-2158 5. Contact Email: cdasteQ61yofrosemead.org 6. Project Description: The project will replace the existing traffic signal controllers with 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and firmware at a minimum of 39 signalized intersections identified in the Scope of Work for this project which are along the following arterials: Garvey Avenue (9 intersections - W to E city limits) Valley Boulevard (7 intersections - W to E city limits) San Gabriel Boulevard (6 intersections N to S city limits) Walnut Grove Avenue and (16 intersections - N to S city limits) Rosemead Boulevard (5 intersections - N to S city limits). The project will provide fiber optic cable connectivity to all of all the traffic signal intersections along these corridors. The traffic signal controller manufacturer and firmware will be determined during the design phase and may include adaptive traffic control system or traffic responsive features, as it is appropriate and feasible for this project. The main purpose of the project is to improve traffic operations, mobility, and safety for the major arterials that run through the City. The design and implementation of traffic elements and actual locations will be determined during the design phase, which will include the following improvements: • Replace traffic signal controllers to 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers, and cabinets as required (TBD during Design). • Install fiber optic communication network along major arterials (new conduits & cables) to improve traffic operations (subject to the design phase). • Install Ethernet switches at existing controller cabinets. • Install communication hubs. • Install vehicle detection (e.g. loop, video) systems (TBD during Design). • Design and implement CCTV camera system (TBD during Design). Rev: 04.28.2020 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000-MR43219 Update traffic signal timing and traffic signal synchronization to provide optimization of traffic flow for the AM and PM peak hours. Design and implement a new central traffic signal management system (software and communication equipment) to monitor and control all of the signalized intersections within the City. At the completion of the design phase, the City shall inform the Metro Project Manager of the number of controllers and equipment needed to upgrade the traffic signal system, and the type of traffic control system they will deploy. In addition, the City shall coordinate the system design through Metro staff to coordinate with other Metro -funded intersection projects and allow communication with the County of Los Angeles Information Exchange Network (IEN). 7. Identify the ITS elements being implemented and the relevant CONNECT -IT Service Package(s), see Exhibit A. Adaptive Traffic Control System and CCTV Monitoring System (TM03 — Traffic Signal Control, DM02 — Performance Monitoring); and Integration to RIITS (TM08 — Traffic Incident Management System). 8. Outline of the concept of operations for the project. The exiting traffic signal equipment along the major corridors requires upgrades to meet current standards. The existing 170 traffic controller does not support Advance Traffic Management System (ATMS) or NextGen connected vehicle technology. The proposed traffic signal improvements will allow the City to improve traffic signal coordination and monitoring along various arterials providing real-time solutions for the residents of the City. The proposed scope of work consists of installing single -mode fiber optic interconnect; upgrading traffic controllers to the 2070 ATC NTCIP compliance controller and new traffic signal cabinets (as needed); CCTV camera system installation; communication equipment upgrades, integration of traffic signals to a new Traffic Management Center (TMC) in the City of Rosemead Public Works; and improved traffic signal timing updates. 9. Identify participating agencies roles and responsibilities. The City of Rosemead will be fully responsible for the design and construction of the project. Although their direct involvement is not required in order to implement this project, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) will be an active participant in this project with coordination of the City's overall traffic signal management system development and integration to the Countywide information exchange network Rev: 04.28.2020 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000-MR43219 (IEN). Coordination with the LAC DPW will maximize the regional arterials corridor traffic operational performance and minimize any potential conflicts. The primary contact for LACDPW is Ron Matsuoka (626-300-4822). By signing and self -certifying this form, the agency commits itself to follow the ITS requirements listed below during project design and implementation. Please be advised that your project may be subject to further review and documentation by Metro and the CONNECT -IT Maintenance Team during project design and implementation phases: • Perform a lifecycle analysis for the ITS project elements and incorporate these costs into the Operations and Maintenance plan as part of the system engineering process, • Maintain and operate the system according to the recommendations of the operations and Maintenance plan upon project completion, • Use the systems engineering process and document the system engineering steps, and • Use the CONNECT -IT interface standards, if required, and conform to the regional configuration management process. Signature: Christopher Daste Date Director of Public Works Rev: 04.28.2020 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000-MR43219 Exhibit A Architecture Reference for CONNECT =IT Service Packages The table below is the architecture reference for the CONNECT -IT service packages. For additional information on the service packages below, to view interconnect diagrams for each service package or to suggest updates to CONNECT -IT, visit www.laconnect-it.com. Service Package Area Commercial Vehicle Operations Short Name CV001 Name _Carrier Operations and Fleet Management CV002 Freight Administration CV003 _ Electronic Clearance CV004 _ CV Administrative Processes CV005 International Border Electronic Clearance _ CV006 Frei ht Signal Prior _ __ CV007 Roadside CVO Safety CV008 Smart Roadside and Virtual WIM CV009 Freight-Secific Dynamic Travel Planning CV011 Drayage Optimization _ CV012 _Freight __ HAZMAT Management _ CV014 CV Driver Security Authentication CV015 Fleet and Freight Security Data Management _ DM01 ITS Data Warehouse DM02 _ Performance Monitoring___ Maintenance and Construction MC01 Maintenance and Construction Vehicle and Equipment Tracldng _ MCO2 Maintenance and Construction Vehicle Maintenance MC05 Roadway Maintenance and Construction MC06 _ Work Zone Management MC07 Work Zone Safety Monitoring MC08_ _ Maintenance and Construction Active Coordination _ Parking Management PMOL Parking Space Management PM02 Smart Park and Ride System _ PM03 Parldng Electronic Payment PM04 Re ional ParldnManagement PM_05 Loading Zone Management Public Safety PS01 _Emergency Call-Taking_and Dispatch PS02 Routing Support for Emergency Responders _ _ PS03 Emergency Vehicle Preem tip 'on PS_04 Mayday Notification_ PS05 _ Vehicle Emergency Response _ PS06 Incident Scene Pre -Arrival Staging Guidance for Emergency Responders PS07_ Incident Scene Safetyonitori 1 _ _PS08 Roadway Service Patrols PS10 Wide -Area Alert P S 11 Early W arning tem PS12 Disaster Response and Recoveg PS13 _ Evacuation and_Reenti Management___ P S 14 Disaster Traveler Information Rev: 04.28.2020 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000-MR43219 Service Padcage Area Public Transportation Short PTO1 Transit Vehicle PT02 Transit Fixed -Route Operations _ PT03 D nnaamic Transit Operations PT_0_4 Transit Fare Collection Mm(ment _ PT05 Transit Security _ PT06 Transit Fleet Manaeg ment PT07 Transit Passenger Counting PT08 Transit Traveler Information_ PT09 _ _Transit Signal Priority PT10 Intermittent Bus Lanes _ PT11 Transit Pedestrian Indication _ _ PT14 Multi -modal Coordination _ _ PT16 Route ID for the VisualIm aip red _ PT17 Transit Connection Protection PT18 Integrated Multi -Modal Electronic Payment_ Support SU01 Connected Vehicle System Monitoring and Management SU02 Core Authorization_ SU03 Data Distribution_ _ —_--SU04_ ap Management_____ SU05 Location and Time _ SU06___Ob iect Registration and Discovery___________ _ SU07 Privacy Protection_ SU08 Security and Credentials Management SU09 Center Maintenance SU1_0 Field Equipment Maintenance SU11 Vehicle Maintenance SU12 Traveler Device Maintenance ___ Sustainable Travel ST01 Emissions Monitoring ST02 Eco -Traffic Signal Timing_ _ ST03 _Eco -Traffic Metering ST04 Roadside Lighting ST05 Electric Charging Stations Management _ _ ST06 HOV/HOT Lane Management _ ST08 Eco -Approach and Departure at Signalized Intersections ST09_ Connected Eco-Drivi_ Traffic M_anag—em ent TM01 Infrastructure -Based Traffic Surveillance _ _ TM02 Vehicle -Based Traffic Surveillance TM_03 _ Traffic Signal Control TM04 Connected Vehicle Traffic Signal System TM05 _ Traffic Metering______ TM06 Traffic Information Dissemination _TM07 _ Regional Traffic Management TM08 Traffic Incident Mana ement System _ TM09 Integrated Decision Support and Demand Management TM10 Electronic Toll Collection _ TM11 Road Use Charging _ _ TM12 Dynamic Roadway Warming_____ TM13 Standard Railroad Grade Crossing _ _ _ Rev: 04.28.2020 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000-MR43219 Package Area - ShortService TM14 Advanced Railroad Grade Crossing _ _ _ TM15 Railroad Operations Coordination TM16 Reversible Lane Management TM17__ _Speed Warning and Enforcement TM19 Roadway Closure Management TM20 Variable Speed Limits TM21 Seed Harmonization _ TM22 Dynamic Lane Management and Shoulder Use _ Traveler Information TI01 Broadcast Traveler Information _ TI02 Personalized Traveler Information _ TI03 Dynamic Route Guidance _ _ TI04 Infrastruchzre-Provided Trip Planni� and Route Guidance TI05_ Travel Services Information and Reservation _ TI06 Dynamic Ridesharing and Shared Use Transportation TI07 In -Vehicle Signage _ Vehicle Safety VS01 Autonomous Vehicle Safety Systems_______ VS02 V2V Basic Safety_ _ VS03 V2V Situational Awareness_ ___ VSO4 V2V Special Vehicle Alert _ VS05 ____ Curve Speed Warning _ VS08 Queue Warning VS09 Reduced Speed Zone Warning Lane Closure_ _ VS10` Restricted Lane Warnings VS11 Oversize Vehicle Warning _ VS12 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safes VS13 Intersection Safety Warning and Collision Avoidance _ VS14 Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control VS15 Infrastructure Enhanced Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control VS16 Automated Vehicle Operations VS17 Traffic Code Dissemination _ Note .• CONNECT -IT service packages may differfrom service packages identified m the NatiouallTS Reference Architecture (ARC -IV. For any service packages notrepresented in CONNECT -IT, refer to ARCUTbyaccessLVwww.arc-itnet. Contact the adnzi dstratoratsAyznmnametronetforquestions regarding CONNECT -IT Rev: 04.28.2020 6 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 ATTACHMENT G-3 SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION, INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS), AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS Grantee is required to attend the LACMTA Arterial ITS Committee Meetings quarterly. Grantee shall coordinate through the Arterial ITS Committee, the Coalition for Transportation Technology and/or other appropriate and recognized forums to ensure consistency with local, subregional and regional ITS plans. Grantee shall provide the opportunity to LACMTA staff and other affected agencies to review, comment and participate on all aspects of the Project implementation to achieve multi -jurisdictional consensus, including, but not limited to, scope of work, consultant selection, PS&E, system design, bid documents and Project deliverables. 2. Grantee shall coordinate with LA County DPW when applicable and shall not advertise the Project for bid to begin construction before all affected agencies have fully executed an agreement regarding the maintenance and operation of traffic signal synchronization system(s) along multi -jurisdictional corridor(s). Grantee shall deliver or email a copy of the fully executed agreement to LACMTA within seven (7) days from the date of full execution. 3. Grantee shall commit and/or secure non-LACMTA funds to maintain and operate the Project improvements. Operations and maintenance plans shall be developed for all ITS projects. For multi -jurisdictional projects, multi -agency agreements shall be executed committing to the long-term operations and maintenance of shared project elements. 4. Grantee's Project shall not make major equipment or timing -plan changes on other Metro funded projects, within the first two years of Grantee's Project implementation/system operation without LACMTA or lead agency prior written approval. 5. For all central traffic control system projects, Grantee shall coordinate the system design through LACMTA staff to allow communication with the Los Angeles County Information Exchange Network (IEN) to facilitate multi -jurisdictional traffic management and coordination. 6. Grantee shall ensure Countywide Signal Priority (CSP) capabilities are maintained when Grantee's Project is on an existing CSP corridor. 7. Grantee shall make available all data from the Project, including, without limitation, improvements and inventory data, to LACMTA upon request. Grantee shall: a. provide real-time traffic data from the Project, if available, to the County IEN Rev: 09.08.2020 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LA9918886 Project#: MR4.3.2.19 FA# 9200000000MR43219 b. allow for archiving through the Regional Integration of ITS (RIITS) Network or any regional ITS software to support regional transportation planning and operations c. populate ITS Field Inventory Resource Sharing Tool (ITS FIRST) with data upon completion of project 8. Grantee shall ensure that the project uses a generally accepted system engineering approach to maintain the integrity and quality of completed projects. 9. Grantee's project shall adhere to existing Metro guidelines for specific subprograms as applicable. The obligations set forth in this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Rev: 09.08.2020 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions Attachment H Traffic Signal Improvements Funding Agreement (FTIP) # LAMIPMR112 FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 MEASURE R FUNDING AGREEMENT HIGHWAY PROGRAM (General) Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 This Funding Agreement ("FA") is made and entered into effective as of September 1, 2020 ("Effective Date"), and is by and between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA") and City of Rosemead ("GRANTEE") for Traffic Signal Improvements (San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley), LACMTA Project ID# MR 4.3.2.20 and FTIP# LAMIPMR112, (the "Project"). This Project is eligible for funding under Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan. WHEREAS, LACMTA adopted Ordinance #08-01, the Traffic Relief and Rail Expansion Ordinance, on July 24, 2008 (the "Ordinance"), which Ordinance was approved by the voters of Los Angeles County on November 4, 2008 as "Measure R" and became effective on January 2, 2009. WHEREAS, $780,000,000 in Measure R funds was identified in Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan for the I-710 North Gap Closure (tunnel) Project (SR -710 North). WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board at its May 25, 2017 meeting, reallocated the remaining Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion, if consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR -710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. WHEREAS, the funding set forth herein is intended to fund the Project Approval/ Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction of the Project. WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board, at its September 26, 2019 meeting, programmed $6,000,000, in Measure R Funds to GRANTEE for PAED, PS&E, Right -of -Way, and Construction, subject to the terms and conditions contained in this FA; and WHEREAS, the Funds are currently programmed as follows: $200,000 in Measure R Funds in Fiscal Years (FY) FY 2020-21; $1,000,000 in FY 2021-22; $2,500,000 FY 2022-23; and $2,300,000 in FY 2023-24. The total designated for PAED, PS&E, Right -of -Way, and Construction of the Project is $6,000,000. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: The terms and conditions of this FA consist of the following and each is incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein: 1. Part I — Specific Terms of the FA 2. Part II — General Terms of the FA 3. Attachment A — Project Funding 4. Attachment B — Measure R Expenditure Plan Guidelines 5. Attachment B-1— Expenditure Plan — Cost & Cash Flow Budget Rev: 02.20.2020 1 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 6. Attachment C — Scope of Work 7. Attachment D — Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines 8. Attachment D-1— intentionally omitted 9. Attachment D-2 —Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report 10. Attachment E — Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Sheet 11. Attachment F — Bond Requirements 12. Attachment G-1— SR -710 North Mobility Improvement Project (MIP) 13. Attachment G-2 — Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (Connect -IT) Consistency Self -Certification Policy Form 14. Attachment G-3 — Signal Synchronization, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and Transportation Technology Improvements 15. Any other attachments or documents referenced in the above documents In the event of a conflict, the Special Grant Conditions, if any, shall prevail over the Specific Terms of the FA and any attachments and the Specific Terms of the FA shall prevail over the General Terms of the FA. Rev: 02.20.2020 2 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this FA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the dates indicated below: LACMTA: LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Phillip A. Washington Chief Executive Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: RODRIGO A. CASTRO-SILVA County Counsel By: Deputy GRANTEE: CITY OF ROSEMEAD By: Gloria Molleda City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Rachel H. Richman City Attorney Date: Date:�� Date: Date: Rev: 02.20.2020 3 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 PART I SPECIFIC TERMS OF THE FA Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 1. Title of the Project (the "Project"): Traffic Signal Improvements (San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley) — Project Approval/Environmental Document (PAED), Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), Right -of -Way, and Construction. LACMTA Project ID# MR4.3.2.20, FTIP# LAMIPMR112. Grant Funds: 2.1 Programmed Funds for this Project consist of the following: Measure R Funds. 2.2 To the extent the Measure R Funds are available; LACMTA shall make to GRANTEE a grant of the Measure R funds in the amount of $6,000,000 (the "Fund") for the Project. LACMTA Board of Directors' action of September 26, 2019 granted the Measure R Funds for the Project. The Funds are programmed over 4 years for Fiscal Years (FY) FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22, FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. 3. This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter's expenditures. LACMTA will withhold five percent (5%) of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work. 4. Attachment A the "Project Funding" documents all sources of funds programmed for the Project as approved by LACMTA. The Project Funding includes the total programmed funds for the Project, including the Funds programmed by LACMTA and, if any, the GRANTEE Funding Commitment of other sources of funding. The Project Funding also includes the fiscal years in which all the funds for the Project are programmed. The Funds are subject to adjustment by subsequent LACMTA Board Action. 5. Attachment B-1 is the Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget (the "Expenditure Plan"). It is the entire proposed cash flow, the Budget and financial plan for the Project, which includes the total sources of all funds programmed to the Project, including GRANTEE and other entity funding commitments, if any, for this Project as well as the fiscal year and quarters the Project funds are anticipated to be expended. GRANTEE shall update the Expenditure Plan annually, no later than December 31, and such update shall be submitted to LACMTA's Senior Executive Officer of Construction & Engineering in writing. If the LACMTA's Senior Executive Officer of Construction & Engineering concurs with such updated Expenditure Plan in writing, Attachment B-1 shall be replaced with the new Attachment B-1 setting forth the latest approved Expenditure Plan. Payments under this FA shall be consistent with Attachment B-1 as revised from time to time. Any change to the final milestone date must be made by a fully executed amendment to this FA. 6. Attachment C is the "Scope of Work". The GRANTEE shall complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work. This Scope of Work shall include a detailed description of the Rev: 02.20.2020 4 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 Project and the work to be completed, including anticipated Project milestones and a schedule consistent with the lapsing policy in Part II, Section 9, and a description of the Project limits, if applicable. No later than December 31 of each year, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA if there are any changes to the final milestone date set forth in the schedule or any changes to the Scope of Work. If LACMTA agrees to such changes, the parties shall memorialize such changes in an amendment to this FA. Work shall be delivered in accordance with the schedule and scope identified in this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing in an amendment to this FA. If GRANTEE fails to meet milestones or delivery of the Project, LACMTA will have the option to suspend or terminate the FA for default as described in Part II, Sections 2, 9, 10 and 11 herein below. To the extent interim milestone dates are not met but GRANTEE believes and can show documentation acceptable to LACMTA supporting GRANTEE'S ability to make up the time so as to not impact the final milestone date, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA of such changes in its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports and such interim milestone dates will automatically be amended to the latest interim milestone dates provided in the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports Attachment D-2. In no event can the final milestone date be amended by a Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. 7. No changes to this FA, including but not limited to the Funds, and any other source of funds from LACMTA in the Project Funding, Expenditure Plan or the Scope of Work shall be allowed without an amendment to the original FA, approved and signed by both parties. 8. Attachment D is the "Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines". GRANTEE shall complete the "Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report". The Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report are attached to this FA as Attachment D_2 in accordance with Attachment D — Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines. 9. Attachment E, the "FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF)", is required to ensure that the Project is programmed correctly in the most up-to-date FTIP document. The FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF) can be found in ProgramMetro FTIP database under the reports section at http_/Iprogram.metro.net. All projects that receive funding through Measure R must be programmed into the FTIP, which includes locally funded regionally significant projects for information and air quality modeling purposes. GRANTEE shall review the Project in ProgramMetro each year and update or correct the Project information as necessary during a scheduled FTIP amendment or adoption. GRANTEE will be notified of amendments and adoptions to the FTIP via e-mail. Changes to the FTIP through ProgramMetro should be made as soon as possible after GRANTEE is aware of any changes to the Project, but no later than October 1 of the year the change or update is effective. Should GRANTEE fail to meet this date, it may affect GRANTEE's ability to access funding, delay the Project and may ultimately result in the Funds being lapsed. 10. LACMTA anticipates it may need to avail itself of lower cost bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes and/or Build America Bonds as defined in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 or similar types of bonds (collectively, the 'Bonds") to provide at least a portion of its funding commitments under this Agreement to GRANTEE. GRANTEE shall ensure that the expenditure of the Funds disbursed to GRANTEE does not jeopardize the tax -exemption of the interest, the Federal subsidy payment or the tax credit, as applicable, as specified in the Bond Requirements Rev: 02.20.2020 5 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 attached as Attachment F to this Agreement. GRANTEE agrees to provide LACMTA with progress reports, expenditure documentation, and any other documentation as reasonably requested by LACMTA and necessary for LACMTA to fulfill its responsibilities as the grantee or administrator or bond issuer of the Funds. With regard to LACMTA debt financing to provide any portion of the Funds, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable actions as may be requested of it by LACMTA's Project Manager for the Project, to assist LACMTA in demonstrating and maintaining over time, compliance with the relevant sections of the Federal Tax Code to maintain such bonds tax status. 11. GRANTEE shall comply with the "Special Grant Conditions" attached as Attachment G, if any. 12. No changes to the (i) Grant amount, (ii) Project Funding, (iii) the Scope of Work (except as provided herein), (iv) Final milestone date or (v) Special Grant Conditions, shall be allowed without a written amendment to this FA, approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee and GRANTEE. Modifications that do not materially affect the terms of this FA, such as redistributing Funds among existing budget line items or non- material schedule changes must be formally requested by GRANTEE and approved by LACMTA in writing. Non -material changes are those changes which do not affect the grant amount or its schedule, Project Funding, or the Scope of Work, including the Work schedule. 13. LACMTA's Address: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention: Shrota Sharma LACMTA Project Manager Mail Stop 99-18-2 Phone (213) 418-3058 E-mail sharmas@metro.net 14. GRANTEE's Address: City of Rosemead 8838 E Valley Blvd Rosemead, CA 91770 Christopher Daste Phone: 626-569-2158 Email: cdaste aacityofrosemead.org Rev: 02.20.2020 6 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 PART II GENERAL TERMS OF THE FA TERM Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 The term of this FA shall commence on the Effective Date of this FA, and shall terminate upon the occurrence of all of the following, unless terminated earlier as provided herein: (i) the agreed upon Scope of Work has been completed; (ii) all LACMTA audit and reporting requirements have been satisfied; and (iii) the final disbursement of the Funds has been made to GRANTEE. All eligible Project expenses as defined in the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D), incurred after the FA Effective Date shall be reimbursed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION Should LACMTA determine there are insufficient Measure R Funds available for the Project, LACMTA may suspend or terminate this FA by giving written notice to GRANTEE at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of such suspension or termination. If a Project is suspended or terminated pursuant to this section, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE any costs incurred after that suspension or termination date, except those costs necessary to: (i) to return any facilities modified by the Project construction to a safe and operable state; and (ii) suspend or terminate the construction contractor's control over the Project. LACMTA's share of these costs will be consistent with the established funding percentages outlined in this F.A. INVOICE BY GRANTEE Unless otherwise stated in this FA, the Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report, with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre -approved by LACMTA, all as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA, shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA Project Manager at the email address shown in Part I and to LACMTA Accounts Payable Department as shown below. Submit invoice with supporting documentation to: ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@METRO.NET (preferable) or mail to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. O. Box 512296 Los Angeles, CA 90051-0296 All invoice material must contain the following information: Re: LACMTA Project ID# MR4.3.2.20 and FA# 9200000000MR43220 Shrota Sharma; Mail Stop 99-18-2 Rev: 02.20.2020 7 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 4. USE OF FUNDS Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 4.1 GRANTEE shall utilize the Funds to complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work and in accordance with the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines and the specifications for use for the transportation purposes described in the Ordinance. 4.2 Attachment C shall constitute the agreed upon Scope of Work between LACMTA and GRANTEE for the Project. The Funds, as granted under this FA, can only be used towards the completion of the Scope of Work detailed in Attachment C. 4.3 GRANTEE shall not use the Funds to substitute for any other funds or projects not specified in this FA. Further, GRANTEE shall not use the Funds for any expenses or activities above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (Attachment C) without an amendment to the FA approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his Designee. To the extent LACMTA provides GRANTEE with bond or commercial paper proceeds, such Funds may not be used to reimburse for any costs that jeopardize the tax exempt nature of such financings as reasonably determined by LACMTA and its bond counsel. 4.4 GRANTEE must use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner. If GRANTEE intends to use a consultant or contractor to implement all or part of the Project, LACMTA requires that such activities be procured in accordance with GRANTEE's contracting procedures and consistent with State law as appropriate. GRANTEE will also use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner when the Funds are used to pay "in-house" staff time. This effective use of funds provision will be verified by LACMTA through on- going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. 4.5 GRANTEE'S employee, officers, councilmembers, board member, agents, or consultants (a "GRANTEE Party") are prohibited from participating in the selection, award, or administration of a third -party contract or sub -agreement supported by the Funds if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. A conflict of interest would include, without limitation, an organizational conflict of interest or when any of the following parties has a financial or other interest in any entity selected for award: (a) a GRANTEE Party (b) any member of a GRANTEE Party's immediate family, (c) a partner of a GRANTEE Party; (d) any organization that employs or intends to employ any of the above. This conflict of interest provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits. 4.6 If a facility, equipment (such as computer hardware or software), vehicle or property, purchased or leased using the Funds, ceases to be used for the proper use as originally stated in the Scope of Work, or the Project is discontinued, any Funds expended for that purpose must be returned to LACMTA as follows: GRANTEE shall be required to repay the Funds in proportion to the useful life remaining and in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio. 4.7 If the Project requires the implementation of an Intelligent Transportation Systems ("ITS") project, GRANTEE shall ensure the Project is consistent with the Regional ITS Architecture. Attachment H-1, the Los Angeles County Regional ITS Rev: 02.20.2020 8 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 Architecture (CONNECT -IT) Consistency Self -Certification Form, must be completed and signed for planned ITS projects and/or ITS projects that use local, state, or federal funds programmed or administered through LACMTA. Refer to www.laconnect-it.com to find information about the CONNECT -IT Service Packages. 4.8 If any parking facilities are designed and/or constructed using the Funds, GRANTEE shall coordinate with LACMTA parking program staff (see www.metro.net for staff listing) in the planning, design and management of the facility and shall ensure that its implementation is consistent with the LACMTA adopted parking policy. For the parking policy, see http://media.metro.net/projects_studies/call projects/images/09%20Appendix% 20D%20Pa rking%20Policy_pdf 5. REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS Funds will be released on a reimbursement basis in accordance with invoices submitted in support of the Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Reports. LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. Reimbursements via Automated Clearing House (ACH) will be made at no cost to GRANTEE. GRANTEE must complete the ACH form and submit such form to LACMTA before grant payments can be made. ACH Request Forms can be found at www.metro.net/projects/call_projects/calLnrojects-reference- documents/.. GRANTEE must provide detailed supporting documentation with its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any, must be spent in direct proportion to the Funds with each quarter's payment. 6. REPORTING AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS/PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS 6.1 GRANTEE shall submit the draft of Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report (Attachment D-2) within sixty (60) days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November, February, May and August to the LACMTA Project Manager for review and pre -approval of the applicable report. LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Reports within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Grantee shall submit the LACMTA pre -approved Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report no later than five (5) days after receipt of LACMTA's written approval. Should GRANTEE fail to submit either the draft or pre -approved reports within five (5) days of the due date and/or submit incomplete reports, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE until the completed required reports are received, reviewed, and approved. The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports shall include all appropriate documentation (such as contractor invoices, timesheets, receipts, etc.), and any changes to interim milestone dates that do not impact the final milestone date. All supporting documents must include a clear justification and explanation of their relevance to the Project. If no activity has occurred during a particular quarter, GRANTEE will still be required to submit the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports indicating no dollars were expended that quarter. If a request for reimbursement exceeds $500,000 in a single month, then GRANTEE can submit such an invoice once per month with supporting documentation. Expenses that are not invoiced to LACMTA Accounts Payable Rev: 02.20.2020 9 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 within ninety (90) days after the lapsing date specified in Part II, Section 9.1 below are not eligible for reimbursement. 6.2 GRANTEE shall submit the Project expenditure estimates for the subsequent fiscal year by February of each year. LACMTA will use the estimates to determine the Project budget for the upcoming fiscal year. 6.3 LACMTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct audits of the Project as deemed appropriate, such as financial and compliance audits, interim audits, pre- award audits, performance audits and final audits. LACMTA will commence a final audit within six months of receipt of acceptable final invoice, provided the Project is ready for final audit (meaning all costs and charges have been paid by GRANTEE and invoiced to LACMTA, and such costs, charges and invoices are properly documented and summarized in the accounting records to enable an audit without further explanation or summarization including actual indirect rates for the period covered by the FA period under review). GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain proper accounting procedures and cash management records and documents in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GRANTEE shall reimburse LACMTA for any expenditure not in compliance with the Scope of Work and/or not in compliance with other terms and conditions of this FA. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE's own expenditures submitted to LACMTA for this Project shall be in compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE's contractors, consultants and suppliers expenditures submitted to LACMTA through GRANTEE's Quarterly Progress/Expenditures shall be in compliance with OMB Circular A-87 or Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 225 (whichever is applicable). Findings of the LACMTA audit are final. When LACMTA audit findings require GRANTEE to return monies to LACMTA, GRANTEE agrees to return the monies within thirty (30) days after the final audit is sent to GRANTEE. 6.4 GRANTEE's records shall include, without limitation, accounting records, written policies and procedures, contract files, original estimates, correspondence, change order files (including documentation covering negotiated settlements), invoices, and any other supporting evidence deemed necessary by LACMTA to substantiate charges related to the Project (all collectively referred to as "records"). Such records shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives to the extent deemed necessary by LACMTA to adequately permit evaluation of expended costs. Such records subject to audit shall also include, without limitation, those records deemed necessary by LACMTA to evaluate and verify, direct and indirect costs, (including overhead allocations) as they may apply to costs associated with the Project. These records must be retained by GRANTEE for three years following final payment under this Agreement. Payment of retention amounts shall not occur until after the LACMTA's final audit is completed. 6.5 GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to comply with the requirements of Part II, Section 5, paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 above. GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to cooperate fully in furnishing or in malting available to LACMTA all records deemed necessary by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives related to the Project. Rev: 02.20.2020 10 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 6.6 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall be afforded access to all GRANTEE'S records and its contractors related to the Project, and shall be allowed to interview any employee of GRANTEE and its contractors through final payment to the extent reasonably practicable. 6.7 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall have access to the offices of GRANTEE and its contractors, shall have access to all necessary records, including reproduction, at no charge to LACMTA, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.8 When business travel associated with the Project requires use of a vehicle, the mileage incurred shall be reimbursed at the mileage rates set by the Internal Revenue Service, as indicated in the United States General Services Administration Federal Travel Regulation, Privately Owned Vehicle Reimbursement Rates. 6.9 GRANTEE shall be responsible for ensuring all contractors/ subcontractors for the Project comply with the terms of the Ordinance. GRANTEE shall cooperate with LACMTA Management Audit Services Department such that LACMTA can meet its obligations under the Ordinance. 6.10 GRANTEE shall certify each invoice by reviewing all subcontractor costs and maintaining internal control to ensure that all expenditures are allocable, allowable and reasonable and in accordance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.11 GRANTEE shall also certify final costs of the Project to ensure all costs are in compliance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this FA. 6.12 In addition to LACMTA's other remedies as provided in this FA, LACMTA may withhold the Funds if the LACMTA audit has determined that GRANTEE failed to comply with the Scope of Work (such as misusing Funds or failure to return Funds owed to LACMTA in accordance with LACMTA audit findings) and /or is severely out of compliance with other terms and conditions as defined by this FA, including the access to records provisions of Part II, Section 6. 7. GRANT This is a one-time only grant of the Measure R Funds subject to the terms and conditions agreed to herein. This grant does not imply nor obligate any future funding commitment on the part of LACMTA. Rev: 02.20.2020 11 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 8. SOURCES AND DISPOSITION OF FUNDS 8.1 The obligation for LACMTA to grant the Funds for the Project is subject to sufficient Funds being made available for the Project by the LACMTA Board of Directors. If such Funds are not made available as anticipated from Measure R Program revenues, LACMTA will have the right to adjust the cash flow accordingly until such funds become available. LACMTA shall have no obligation to provide any other funds for the Project, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by LACMTA. 8.2 GRANTEE shall fully fund and contribute the GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any is identified in the Project Funding (Attachment A), towards the cost of the Project. If the Funds identified in Attachment A are insufficient to complete the Project, GRANTEE agrees to secure and provide such additional non-LACMTA programmed funds necessary to complete the Project. 8.3 GRANTEE shall be responsible for any and all cost overruns for the Project pursuant to Section 8.2. 8.4 GRANTEE shall be eligible for the Funds up to the grant amount specified in Part I, Section 2 of this FA subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. Any Funds expended by GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of this FA shall not be reimbursed nor shall they be credited toward the GRANTEE Funding Commitment requirement, without the prior written consent of LACMTA. GRANTEE Funding Commitment dollars expended prior to the year the Funds are awarded shall be spent at GRANTEE's own risk, or as delineated in a Letter of No Prejudice executed by the prospective GRANTEE and LACMTA. 8.5 If GRANTEE receives outside funding for the Project in addition to the Funds identified in the Project Funding and the Expenditure Plan at the time this grant was awarded, this FA shall be amended to reflect such additional funding. If, at the time of final invoice or voucher, funding for the Project (including the Funds, GRANTEE Funding Commitment, and any additional funding) exceeds the actual Project costs, then the cost savings shall be applied in the same proportion as the sources of funds from each party to this FA as specified in the Project Funding and both the Funds and GRANTEE Funding Commitment required for the Project shall be reduced accordingly. LACMTA shall have the right to use any cost savings associated with the Funds at its sole discretion, including, without limitation, programming the unused Funds to another project or to another grantee. If, at the time of final voucher, it is determined that GRANTEE has received Funds in excess of what GRANTEE should have received for the Project, GRANTEE shall return such overage to LACMTA within 30 days from final voucher. TIMELY USE OF FUNDS / REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS 9.1 GRANTEE must demonstrate timely use of the Funds by: (i) Executing this FA within ninety (90) days of receiving formal transmittal of the FA from LACMTA, or by December 31 of the Rev: 02.20.2020 12 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 first Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, whichever date is later; and (ii) Beginning Project Design, Preliminary Engineering -(PE) within six (6) months from completion of environmental clearance, if appropriate. (iii) Executing Contracts for Construction or Capital purchase within twelve (12) months from the date of completion of design; and (iv) Delivering Work in accordance with schedule; changes to the schedule will require an Amendment to Attachment C to reflect updated milestone dates. Meeting the Project milestone due dates as agreed upon by the LACMTA and GRANTEE in Attachment C (Scope of Work) of this FA; and (v) Submitting the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA; and (vi) Expending the Funds granted under this FA for allowable costs within three years or 36 months July 1 of the Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, unless otherwise stated in this FA. All Funds programmed for FY 2020-21 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2023. All Funds programmed for FY 2021-22 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2024. All Funds programmed for FY 2022-23 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2025. All Funds programmed for FY 2023-24 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2026. 9.2 In the event that the timely use of the Funds is not demonstrated as described in Part II, Section 9.1 of this FA, the Project will be reevaluated by LACMTA and the Funds may be reprogrammed to another project by the LACMTA Board of Directors in accordance with the Ordinance. In the event that all the Funds are reprogrammed, this FA shall automatically terminate. 10. DEFAULT A Default under this FA is defined as any one or more of the following: (i) GRANTEE fails to comply with the terms and conditions contained herein; and/or (ii) GRANTEE fails to perform satisfactorily or make material changes, as determined by LACMTA at its sole discretion, to the Expenditure Plan, the Scope of Work, or the Project Funding without LACMTA's prior written consent or approval as provided herein. 11. REMEDIES 11.1 In the event of a Default by GRANTEE, LACMTA shall provide written notice of such Default to GRANTEE with a 30 -day period to cure the Default. In the event GRANTEE fails to cure the Default, or commit to cure the Default and commence the same within such 30 -day period to the satisfaction of LACMTA, LACMTA shall have the following remedies: (i) LACMTA may terminate this FA; (ii) LACMTA may make no further disbursements of Funds to GRANTEE; and/or (iii) LACMTA may recover from GRANTEE any Funds disbursed to GRANTEE as allowed by law or in equity. Rev: 02.20.2020 13 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 11.2 Effective upon receipt of written notice of termination from LACMTA, GRANTEE shall not undertake any new work or obligation with respect to this FA unless so directed by LACMTA in writing. Any Funds expended after termination shall be the sole responsibility of GRANTEE. 11.3 The remedies described herein are non-exclusive. LACMTA shall have the right to enforce any and all rights and remedies herein or which may be now or hereafter available at law or in equity. 12. COMMUNICATIONS 12.1 GRANTEE shall ensure that all Communication Materials contain recognition of LACMTA's contribution to the Project as more particularly set forth in "Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines" available online at http: I /metro. net 112artners-civic. The Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines may be changed from time to time during the course of this Agreement. GRANTEE shall be responsible for complying with the latest Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines during the term of this Agreement, unless otherwise specifically authorized in writing by the LACMTA Chief Communications Officer. 12.2 For purposes of this Agreement, "Communications Materials" include, but are not limited to, press events, public and external newsletters, printed materials, advertising, websites radio and public service announcements, electronic media, and construction site signage. A more detailed definition of "Communications Materials" is found in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines. 12.3 The Metro logo is a trademarked item that shall be reproduced and displayed in accordance with specific graphic guidelines. The preferred logo lock-up for Funding Recipients to use is included in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines. 12.4 GRANTEE shall ensure that any subcontractor, including, but not limited to, public relations, public affairs, and/or marketing firms hired to produce Project Communications Materials for public and external purposes will comply with the requirements contained in this Section. 12.5 The LACMTA Project Manager shall be responsible for monitoring GRANTEE's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Section. GRANTEE's failure to comply with the terms of this Section shall be deemed a default hereunder and LACMTA shall have all rights and remedies set forth herein. 13. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 13.1 This FA, along with its Attachments, constitutes the entire understanding between the parties, with respect to the subject matter herein. The FA shall not be amended, nor any provisions or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the parties who agreed to the original FA or the same level of authority. Adoption of revisions or Rev: 02.20.2020 14 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 supplements to the Guidelines shall cause such revisions or supplements to become incorporated automatically into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 13.2 GRANTEE is obligated to continue using the Project dedicated to the public transportation purposes for which the Project was initially approved. The Project right- of-way, the Project facilities constructed or reconstructed on the Project site, and/or Project property purchased, excluding construction easements and excess property (whose proportionate proceeds shall be distributed in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio), shall remain dedicated to public transportation use in the same proportion and scope and to the same extent as described in this FA. Equipment acquired as part of the Project, including office equipment, vehicles, shall be dedicated to that use for their full economic life cycle, including any extensions of that life cycle achieved by reconstruction, rehabilitation, or enhancements. 13.3 In the event that there is any legal court (e.g., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, or the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California) proceeding between the parties to enforce or interpret this FA, to protect or establish any rights or remedies hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees. 13.4 Neither LACMTA nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or committed to be done by GRANTEE under or in connection with any work performed by and or service provided by GRANTEE, its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors under this FA. GRANTEE shall fully indemnify, defend and hold LACMTA and its subsidiaries, and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any liability and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of risk of property, any environmental obligation, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of the Project, including without limitation: (i) use of the Funds by GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors; (ii) breach of GRANTEE's obligations under this FA; or (iii) any act or omission of GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors in the performance of the work or the provision of the services, in connection with the Project including, without limitation, the Scope of Work, described in this FA. 13.5 Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligation hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by unforeseen causes including acts of God, acts of a public enemy, and government acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the affected party. Each party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any such circumstances claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performance of any obligations under this FA. 13.6 GRANTEE shall comply with and ensure that work performed under this FA is done in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and procedural requirements including Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and the Rev: 02.20.2020 15 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 applicable requirements and regulations of LACMTA. GRANTEE acknowledges responsibility for obtaining copies of and complying with the terms of the most recent federal, state, or local laws and regulations, and LACMTA requirements including any amendments thereto. 13.7 GRANTEE agrees that the applicable requirements of this FA shall be included in every contract entered into by GRANTEE or its contractors relating to work performed under this FA and LACMTA shall have the right to review and audit such contracts. 13.8 GRANTEE shall not assign this FA, or any part thereof, without prior approval of the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his designee. Any assignment by GRANTEE without said prior consent by LACMTA shall be void and unenforceable. 13.9 This FA shall be governed by California law. If any provision of this FA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. 13.10 The covenants and agreements of this FA shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. 13.11 GRANTEE will advise LACMTA prior to any key Project staffing changes. Notice will be given to the parties at the address specified in Part I, unless otherwise notified in writing of change of address. 13.12 GRANTEE, in the performance of the work described in this FA, is not a contractor nor an agent or employee of LACMTA. GRANTEE attests to no organizational or personal conflicts of interest and agrees to notify LACMTA immediately in the event that a conflict, or the appearance thereof, arises. GRANTEE shall not represent itself as an agent or employee of LACMTA and shall have no powers to bind LACMTA in contract or otherwise. Rev: 02.20.2020 16 Measure R Funding Agreement — Highways — General Qi 0 N N M �i O O O O O O O O N ON d ul A QJ Cd UJ E W u 0 0 < 0 0� O O Cl o o O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 al �+sn to t'% e v ea w us N w w 0 0 0 0 O O o o O n7 F�}y' M N Hi yq M N d9 re� O 0 O 0 0 0 N p o cq N 0 v4 N TWV+ N O (iwVy wCD 0 o O '-i w vj 0 0 o ri N O CD O O r4 O rq b9 Vi d9 O 69 b9 69 F z C7 z W P z ] w y z rA w p � A O w a a w z w w °a w x °a P4 u O P4 g0 H 0 H P. o y o 0 V LIU 0 w W FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 ATTACHMENT B MEASURE R EXPENDITURE PLAN GUIDELINES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY State Law Requires All Measure R Project and Program Sponsors to Submit an Expenditure Plan To be eligible to receive Measure R revenues, an agency sponsoring a capital project or program must by state law (AB 2321) submit an expenditure plan that is acceptable to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Pursuant to this law, LACMTA cannot release Measure R funds to capital project or program sponsors until an expenditure plan containing the following elements is submitted, reviewed and deemed satisfactory by LACMTA. LACMTA staff will request that an expenditure plan be submitted before making a recommendation to the LACMTA Board to program funds to that project: o The estimated total cost for each project and program and/or each project or program activity; o Funds other than Measure R that the project or program sponsor anticipates will be expended on the projects and programs and/or each project or program activity; o The schedule during which the project sponsor anticipates funds will be available for each project and program and/or each project or program activity; and, o The expected completion dates for each project and program and/or project or program activity. Each of the above elements must be provided in enough detail to determine consistency with Measure R, the Long Range Transportation Plan for Los Angeles County, and the Los Angeles County Transportation Improvement Program (also a statutorily mandated function), as follows: o Project or program scope of work, including sufficient information to determine funding eligibility, including, but not limited to, the anticipated proportional use of current rail rights-of-way, state highways, and below -ground subways versus any other rights-of-way or above -ground work; o A current -year cost estimate breakdown of the major sub -elements of the project such as overhead, environmental and permit work, design and engineering, right-of-way, construction/installation (including maintenance facilities, rail yard, equipment and other major components), construction/installation support, interest costs, rolling stock, and other supporting components; o Any extraordinary project cost escalation issues, such as extraordinary commodity, right- of-way, surety, energy costs, etc.; o A specific and accurate description of the source, commitment, and anticipated annual availability of any federal, state, local, or private funding identified for the project if applicable including a 3% local funding contribution to rail projects if indicated in Measure R and necessary to meet project expenses, and if the source funds are in current or year -of -expenditure dollars; Rev: 11-1-14 1 FA Measure R Hwys Sub Attachment B Measure R Expenditure Guidelines FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 o An annual schedule, in current dollars, of anticipated costs by the cost estimate categories described above; and; o The expected completion by month and year of project or program completion. Below is an excerpt of AB 2321 (2008, Feuer), the state legislation that requires the expenditure plan. What AB 2321(2008, Feuer)Says About the Expenditure Plan: Section b (3) B (1) Prior to submitting the ordinance to the voters, the MTA shall adopt an expenditure plan for the net revenues derived from the tax. The expenditure plan shall include, in addition to other projects and programs identified by the MTA, the specified projects and programs listed in paragraph (3) ofsubdivision (b), the estimated total cost for each project and program, funds other than the taxrevenues that the MTA anticipates will be expended on the projects and programs, and the schedule during which the MTA anticipates funds will be available for each project and program. The MTA shall also identify in its expenditure plan the expected completion dates for each project described in subparagraph (A) ofparagraph (3)ofsubdivision (b). To be eligible to receive revenues derived from the tax, an agency sponsoring a capital project or capital program shall submit to to MTA an expenditure plan for its project orprogram containing the same elements as the expenditure plan that MTA is required by this subdivision to prepare. (k) No later than 365 days prior to the adoption ofan amendment described in paragraph (1) to an expenditure plan adopted pursuant to subdivision (), including, hut not limited to, the expenditure plan adopted by the MTA board as 'AttachmentA "in Ordinance #08-01 adopted by the board on July 24, 2008, and in addition to any other notice requirements in the proposing ordinance, the board shall notify the Members of the Legislature representing the County ofLos Angeles ofall ofthe following - (1) A description ofthe proposed amendments to the adopted expenditure plan that would do any ofthe following.• (A) Affect the amount ofnet reven ues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to this act that is proposed to be expended on a capital project orprojects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (B) Affect the schedule for the availability offunds proposed to be expended on a capital project orprojects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (C) Affect the schedule for the estimated or expected completion date ofa capital project or projects identified in the adopted expenditure plan. (2) The reason for the proposed amendment. (3) The estimated impact the proposed amendment will ha ve on the schedule, cost, scope, or timely availability offundingfor the capital project orprojects contained in the adopted expenditure plan. Rev: 11-1-14 2 FA Measure R Hwys Sub Attachment B Measure R Expenditure Guidelines ATTACHMENT B-1- EXPENDITURE PLAN COST & CASH FLOW BUDGET Measure R Program - Funding Agreement Projects - FA# 9200000000MR43220 Traffic Signal Improvements (San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley), MR4.3.2.20 PROGRAMMED SOURCES OF FUNDS SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2020-21 Qtr PY 2020.21 Qtr2 PY 2020.21 Qtr3 FY 2020-21 I Qtr4 FY 2021.22 I Qtr I FY 2021-22 Qtr FY 2021-22 I Qtr3 FY 2021.22 Qtr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $500 $2,500 $5,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $83,000 PS&E $10,000 $15,000 $35,000 $57,000 $150,000 $125,000 $75,000 $467,000 RW Support $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $75,000 Const. Support $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 $125,000 RW 1 $400,000 $400,000 Construction 1 $50,000 $50,000 Total MEASURE R $10,500 $17,500 1 $65,000 1 $107,000 1 $200,000 $175,000 $525,000 $100,000 $1,200,000 SUM FROG LACMTA FUNDS: $10,500 $17,500 $65,000 $107,000 $200,000 $175,000 $525,000 $100,000 $1,200,000 . ,?`LW 9tt�ifY)t j NYRf� iROiJt f.�� 0Yv'gyb't SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2022.23 QtrI FY 2022.23 Qtr2 FY 2022-23 Qtr3 FY 2022-23 Qtr4 FY 2023.24 Qtr FY 2023-U Qtr2 FY 2023.24 Qtr3 FY 2023-24 Qtr4 TOTAL BUDGET LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS: MEASURE R FUNDS: PAED $0 PS&E $0 RW Support $0 Const. Support $75,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $90,000 $60,000 $850,000 RW $0 Construction $250,000 $600,000 1 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 i 600,000 $400,000 $300,000 $3,950,000 Total MEASURER 1 $325,000 1 $725,000 $725,000 $725,000 $725,000 1 $725,000 $490,000 $360,000 $4,800,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $325,000 $725,000 $725,000 $725,000 $725,000 5725,000 $490,000 $360,000 54,800,000 SUMMARY OF ALL'FUNDS PAED $500 $2,500 $5,000 $25,000 525,000 1 $25,000 SO SO 583,000 PREE $10,000 $15,000 $35,000 $57,000 $150,000 $125,000 $75,000 $0 467,000 RW Sup ort $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $o $0 $0 $75,000 Const. Support $75,000 1 $125,000 $125,000 5125,000 $125,000 $150,000 $140,000 $110,000 $975,000 RW $0 1 $0 $0 SO $0 $o $400,000 1 $0 $400,000 Construction $250,000 1 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $400,000 $350,000 $4,000,000 TOTAL MILESTONES $335,500 742,500 4790,000 $832,000 1 $925,000 900,000 1,015,000 $460,000 6,000,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS $335,500 $742,500 1790,000 $832,000 $925,000 $900,000 1 $1,015,000 1 $460,000 $6,000,000 SUM NON-LACMTA FUNDS So $0 so $0 $0 $01 SO I $0 1 $0 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $335,500 $742,500 $790,000 $832,000 $925,000 $900,000 $1,015,000 $460,000 $6,000,000 FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 ATTACHMENT C SCOPE OF WORK Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 PROJECT TITLE: Traffic Signal Improvements (San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley) PROJECT LOCATION: The project is located on the following intersections in the City of Rosemead, in the San Gabriel Valley subregion. 1. San Gabriel Boulevard at Hellman Avenue 2. San Gabriel Boulevard at Garvey Avenue 3. San Gabriel Boulevard at Graves Avenue 4. San Gabriel Boulevard at Rush Street 5. Walnut Grove Avenue at Mission Drive 6. Rosemead Boulevard at Lower Azusa Road 7. Rosemead Boulevard at Valley Boulevard 8. Valley Boulevard at Muscatel Avenue 9. Valley Boulevard at Ivar Avenue 10. Valley Boulevard at Mission Drive PROJECT LIMITS: This project limits are at the intersections of above signalized locations, including any necessary improvements on the approaches required by signal design. NEXUS TO SR -710 OPERATIONAL AND MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS: Rosemead Traffic Signal Improvements — Various locations (San Gabriel, Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley) is an eligible SR -710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement approved by the Metro Board of Directors on September 26, 2019. The project contributes to mobility and operational benefits in the SR -710 corridor between I-10 and I-210 consistent with the Purpose and Need of the 710 Gap Closure project. The project will upgrade the traffic signal system, and other components at major intersections to improve the traffic operations and mobility in the City. These improvements will be planned and developed in conjunction with adjacent cities to ensure that traffic operations are coordinated through major corridors within the SR -710 area. PROJECT BACKGROUND: The project was identified, and was awarded LACMTA Measure R funding, as part of a broader package of projects known as the SR -710 Mobility Improvement Projects (MIPS). The SR -710 MIPS are the result of reallocated Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion. These projects are consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR - 710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway. The project will improve traffic progression at these intersections in the City. These intersections currently operate at estimated level of service (LOS) D, and are forecast to operate at LOS E and F by 2040 without improvements. Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 PROJECT BUDGET: COMPONENT AMOUNT PA/ED $83,000 PS&E $467,000 R/W Support $75,000 R/W Capital $400,000 Construction Support $975,000 Construction Capital $4,000,000 Total Budget $6,000,000 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 SCOPE: The City plans to install left -turn phasing and overlapping right -turn phasing to improve traffic signal phasing and upgrade existing traffic signals to current standards at the following locations: 1. Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Hellman Avenue Implement EB/WB protective left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, encroachment permit and requirements. Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. 2. Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Garvey Avenue Implement SB/WB right -turn overlap phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Intersection improvements may be subject to ROW availability, environmental impacts, and further studies in the design development, if found feasible, add additional SB left -turn lane. 3. Intersection at Gabriel Boulevard and Graves Avenue Implement EB/WB protected/permitted left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 4. Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Rush Street Implement NB/SB left -turn protected phasing and EB/WB protected/permitted left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 5. Intersection at Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive Implement protected/permitted left -turn phasing in all directions. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 6. Intersection at Rosemead Boulevard and Lower Azusa Road Upgrade NB/SB protected left -turn phasing with new poles and left turn signals on mast arms to current standards. Currently LT poles are on medians and are not to current standards. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Rosemead Boulevard is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 encroachment permit and requirements. Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. 7. Intersection at Rosemead Boulevard and Valley Boulevard Implement NB/SB right -turn overlap phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Rosemead Boulevard is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, encroachment permit and requirements. Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. 8. Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Muscatel Avenue Implement EB/WB protected left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 9. Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Ivar Avenue Implement EB/WB protected left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 10. Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Mission Drive Implement EB/WB protected/permitted left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. At the completion of the design phase, the City shall inform the Metro Project Manager of the number of controllers and equipment needed to upgrade the traffic signal system, and the type of traffic control system they will deploy. In addition, the City shall coordinate the system design through Metro staff and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to coordinate with other Metro -funded traffic signal control projects in the immediate and surrounding areas and allow communication with the County of Los Angeles Information Exchange Network (IEN). DESIGN: I. Preliminary Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Conduct field visits of the project area to identify design issues. Record existing site conditions in photographs and/or video. B. Conduct survey of the project area, establishing horizontal and vertical control for the project as necessary. C. Identify and coordinate with all utilities in the project area to facilitate the final design of the Project. D. Verify if a geotechnical survey will be necessary. If yes, conduct geotechnical investigations as necessary. E. Verify if right-of-way (R/W) acquisitions and/or vacations will be necessary. At this point all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. F. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and establish required environmental, review, approval and permitting process. G. Prepare construction cost estimate. Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 II. Environmental Analysis It is anticipated this project will be either an exempt project or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Prepare Initial Study (IS), consistent with CEQA Guidelines. B. If IS results in any impacts, prepare MND or any other applicable environmental document as necessary. C. Prepare the Draft IS and Draft MND for public circulation as necessary, respond to questions and comments, and finalize the environmental process. D. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W for required environmental review and approval. III. Final Design Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Prepare plans for the required improvements, consistent with City and/or Caltrans format. B. Assist the City for any Community Information Workshop if necessary. C. Prepare construction specifications. D. Prepare an engineer's construction cost estimate based on the itemized quantity take -off from the contract documents. E. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and obtain required approval and permits. F. Complete Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) Bid Package. IV. Project Management Grantee expects to provide overall project and program management, funding management through its in-house staff, and consultant. RIGHT-OF-WAY: At this point, all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. CONSTRUCTION: The construction contract will be bid out per Public Contract Code and City requirements. Grantee expects to provide construction management, inspection, contract administration, funding management through its in-house staff and consultant. Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Worlc FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 MILESTONES: The implementation schedule for this project will be as follows: Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work START DATE COMPLETION DATE SOLICITATION BID PROPOSAL 01/21 07/21 RFP Advertisement 03/21 04/21 Contract Award 06/21 07/21 PLANNING 01/21 12/21 Coordinate with LA County for regional system compatibility and integration 01/21 Until end of project Review and Data Collection 08/21 10/21 Prepare Design Criteria/Requirements, including coordination with LACO for regional system compatibility and integration 10/21 12/21 PA&ED 07/21 06/22 Prepare IS, if applicable MND, finalize environmental approval 07/21 06/22 PS&E 10/21 08/22 Preliminary PS&E 10/21 02/22 Final PS&E 02/22 08/22 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW, APPROVALS, AND PERMITS 04/22 08/22 Local Agencies 04/22 08/22 Caltrans 04/22 08/22 CONSTRUCTION 08/22 12/24 PS&E Bid Package Advertisement 08/22 09/22 Contract Award 09/22 11/22 Construction 11/22 112/24 System Integration and Testing 09/24 12/2 Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work 6,112 FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 ATTACHMENT C — Location Map L='i° ani It Q. Y NaRr a /F f" I � t 4 R,nxrc' Rn` 6, Jrn W�ndr wnv a tll®6mi Go __WRIGGINS7:�r EP.gin�r (-Y�YIy _ Rev: 05.03.19 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 C0 N V4 . • i� Bufeau of Land Management, Uri, HE G FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of Work FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 FA ATTACHMENT D PROJECT REPORTING & EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES REPORTING PROCEDURES Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report (Attachment D2) are required for all projects. The GRANTEE shall be subject to and comply with all applicable requirements of the funding agency regarding project -reporting requirements. In addition, GRANTEE will submit the Quarterly Expenditure Report to the LACMTA, after receiving LACMTA Project Manager's acceptance of the draft report, at ACCOUNTSPAYABLEOMETRO.NET or by mail to Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Accounts Payable, P. O. Box 512296, Los Angeles, California 90051-0296. Please note that letters or other forms of documentation may not be substituted for this form. • The Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report covers all activities related to the project and lists all costs incurred. It is essential that GRANTEE provides complete and adequate response to all the questions. The expenses listed must be supported by appropriate documentation with a clear explanation of the purpose and relevance of each expense to the project. • In cases where there are no activities to report, or problems causing delays, clear explanation, including actions to remedy the situation, must be provided. • GRANTEE is required to track and report on the project schedule. LACMTA will monitor the timely use of funds and delivery of projects. Project delay, if any, must be reported each quarter. • The draft Quarterly Progress/ Expenditure Report is due to the LACMTA as soon as possible after the close of each quarter, but no later than the following dates for each fiscal year: Quarter Report Due Date July —September November 30 October - December February 28 January - March May 31 April - June August 31 LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Expenditure Report within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Rev: 02.13.2020 FA Local Attachment C Admin Guidelines FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 Upon completion of the Project a final report that includes project's final evaluation must be submitted. EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES • Any activity or expense charged above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (FA Attachment C) is considered ineligible and will not be reimbursed by the LACMTA unless prior written authorization has been granted by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee. • Any expense charged to the grant must be clearly and directly related to the project. Administrative cost is the ongoing expense incurred by the GRANTEE for the duration of the project and for the direct benefit of the project as specified in the Scope of Work (Attachment C). Examples of administrative costs are personnel, office supplies, and equipment. As a condition for eligibility, all costs must be necessary for maintaining, monitoring, coordinating, reporting and budgeting of the project. Additionally, expenses must be reasonable and appropriate to the activities related to the project. • LACMTA is not responsible for, and will not reimburse any costs incurred by the GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of the FA, unless written authorization has been granted by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee. DEFINITIONS Allowable Cost: To be allowable, costs must be reasonable, recognized as ordinary and necessary, consistent with established practices of the organization, and consistent with industry standard of pay for work classification. • Excessive Cost: Any expense deemed "excessive" by LACMTA staff would be adjusted to reflect a "reasonable and customary" level. For detail definition of "reasonable cost", please refer to the Federal Register OMB Circulars A-87 Cost Principals for State and Local Governments; and A-122 Cost Principals for Nonprofit Organizations. • Ineligible Expenditures: Any activity or expense charged above and beyond the approved Scope of Work is considered ineligible. Rev: 02.13.2020 FA Local Attachment C Admin Guidelines LACMTA FA MEASURE RATTACH MENT D-2 QUARTERLY PROGRESS / EXPENSE REPORT GRANTEES ARE REQUESTED TO EMAIL THIS REPORT TO ACCOU NTSPAYAB LE0 M ETRO. N ET or submit by mail to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. O. Box 512296 Los Angeles, California 90051-0296 after the close of each quarter, but no later than November 30, February 28, May 31 and August 31. Please note that letters or other forms of documentation may not be substituted for this form. Refer to the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D) for further information. Grantee To Complete Invoice # Invoice Date FA# Quarterly Report # SECTIONQUARTERLY EXPENSE REPORT Please itemize grant -related charges for this Quarter on Page 5 of this report and include totals in this Section. Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report LACMTA Measure R Grant $ QuarterProject This Quarter Expenditure Retention Amount Net Invoice Amount (Less Retention) Project -to -Date Expenditure Funds Expended to Date (Include this Quarter) Total Project Budget % of Project Budget Expended to Date Balance Remaining Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report SECTION 2: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE: FA #: QUARTERLY REPORT SUBMITTED FOR: Fiscal Year: 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 ❑ 2017-2018 F72018-2019 F12019-2020 Quarter: OQ1: Jul - Sep F—JQ2: Oct - Dec MQ3: Jan - Mar F1Q4: Apr - Jun DATE SUBMITTED: LACMTA MODAL CATEGORY: FRSTI ElPedestrian Signal Synchronization FJTDM Bicycle Goods Movement FTransit Name: LACMTA Project Manager Phone Number: E-mail: Project Sponsor Contact / Project Manager Contact Name: Job Title: Mailing Address: Phone Number: E-mail: Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report 1. DELIVERABLES&MILESTONES List all deliverables and milestones as stated in the FA, with start and end dates. Calculate the total project duration. DO NOT CHANGE THE ORIGINAL FA MILESTONE STARTAND END DATES SHOWNINTHE2 ND AND 3RD COLUMNS BBLOW. Grantees must make every effort to accurately portray milestone dates in the original FA Scope of Work, since this will provide the basis for calculating anyproject delay. If milestone start and/or end dates change from those stated in the Oiiginal FA Scope of Work, indicate the new dates under Actual Schedule helow and re -calculate the project duration. However, this does not change the original milestones in your FA. PER YOUR FA AGREEMENT, ANY CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE MUST BE FORMALLYSUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER TO LACMTA FOR WRITTEN CONCURRENCE. FA Milestones Original FA Schedule in Scope of Work Actual Schedule Start Date End Date Start Date End Date Environmental Clearance Design Bid & Award Design Right -of -Way Acquisition Construction Bid & Award Ground Breaking Event Construction Ribbon Cutting Event Total Project Duration (Months) 2. PROJECT COMPLETION A. Based on the comparison of the original and actual project milestone schedules above, project is (select only one) : On schedule per original FA schedule Between 12-24 months behind original schedule ❑ Less than 12 months behind original schedule F]More than 24 months behind original schedule B. Was the project design started within G months of the date originally stated in the FA? Yes F-1 No ❑ Not Applicable C. Was a construction contract or capital purchase executed within 9 months after completion of design / specifications? ❑ Yes F No F Not Applicable Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report 3. TASKS"/ MILESTONES ACCOMPLISHED List tasks or milestones accomplished and progress made this quarter. 4. PROJECT DELAY If project is delayed, describe reasons for delay (this quarter). Pay particular attention to schedule delays. If delay is for the same reason as mentioned in previous quarters, please indicate by writing "Same as Previous Quarter". 5. ACTION ITEMS TO RESOLVE DELAY If the project is delayed (as described in #4), include action items that have been, or will be, undertaken to resolve the delay. Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report SECTION 4: ITEMIZED LISTING OF EXPENSES AND CHARGES THIS QUARTER All expenses and charges must be itemized and listed below. Each item listed must be verifiable by an invoice and/or other proper documentation. The total amounts shown here must be equal to this quarter's expenditures listed on page 1 of this report. All expenses and charges must be reflective of the approved budget and rates as shown in the FA Attachment B, Scope of Work. Use additional pages if needed. Note: All receipts, invoices, and time sheets, attached and included with this Expense Report must be listed and shown under the Invoice Number column of the Itemized Listing (above). Invoice Payment Information: LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. ACH Payments require that you complete an ACH Request Form and fax it to Accounts Payable at 213-922-6107. ACH Request Forms can be found at www.metro.net/callforprojects. Written exception requests for Check Payments should be completed and faxed to Accounts Payable at 213-922-6107. I certify that I am the responsible Project Manager or fiscal officer and representative of and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the information stated in this report is true and correct. Date Title Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment D-2 Quarterly Report ATTACHMENT E Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($000) Project Description: Install left -turn phasing and overlapping right -tum phasing to improve traffic signal phasing and upgrade SCAG RTP Pro odelect : Stu GRT Is Model: Model #: existing traffic signals to current standards at 10 intersections: 1)San Gabriel Blvd/Hellman Ave; 2) San Gabriel Blvd/Garvey PM: All Cayer - (714)883-8677 Ave; 3) San Gabriel Blvd/Graves Ave; 4) San Gabriel Blvd/Rush St; 5) Walnut Grove Ave/Mission Dr, 6) Rosemead Blvd/Lower Azusa Rd; 7) Rosemead Blvd/Valley Blvd; 8) Valley Blvd/Muscatel Ave; 9) Valley Blvd/lvar Ave; 10) Valley Blvd/Mission Dr. LS: N LS GROUP Conformity Category:: TCM System :Local Hwy Route: Postmile: Distance: Phase: No Project Activity Completion Date 06/30/2026 Lane # Extd: Lane # Prop: Impry Desc: Air Basin: SCAB Envir Doc: INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION - CEQA - 1 2131 /2 02 1 Toll Rate: Toll Colc Loc: Toll Method: Hov acs eg loc: Liza: Los Angeles -Long Sub -Area: Sub -Region: San Gabriel Valley 0.00 Beach -Santa Ana COG CTIPS ID: EA #: PPNO: Program Code: NCNH2 - SIGNAL(S)-AT INTERSECTIONS (NON SIGNAL SYNCH) Stop Loc: PHASE PRIOR 20/21 21122 22/23 23124 24/25 25126 BEYOND PROG TOTAL MR20H - Measure R 20% Highway PE $550 $0 $550 .................... _.._.... ............. ...............................................--....... ..................................................... _...... _..... ._.......__...._.._._.............. ......... .._._..................._...._.._....... RW $475 .... .---..................................... ...... ............ $0 -'----......... ... _........... _-_.... -..... __............................... _._.._.__... $475 ..... ..................... .--.._-----........... _.................................._-___ ........................................... _.......... _.......... _.... ..... _................................... -...... —........ _.......... CON $0 __........ ...... _.__................ — ----- .... $4,975 ---...._........_..._.__..... ._._..._...._....__........... _...._...... $4,975 General Comment: Modeling Comment: TCM Comment: Amendment Comment: CMP Comment: Narrative: SUBTOTAL $1,025 $4,975 $6;000 TOTAL PE: $550 TOTAL RW: $475 TOTAL CON: $4,975 TOTAL PROGRAMMED: $6,000 Change reason:NEW PROJECT Total Project Cost $6,000 Page 1 Tuesday, November 24, 2020 FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 ATTACHMENT F BOND REQUIREMENTS Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 The provisions of this Attachment F apply only if and to the extent some or all of the Funds are derived from LACMTA issued Bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes (collectively, the "Bonds"). GRANTEE acknowledges that some or all of the Funds may be derived from Bonds, the interest on which is tax-exempt for federal tax purposes or with respect to which LACMTA receives a Federal subsidy for a portion of the interest cost or the investor receives a tax credit. GRANTEE further acknowledges its understanding that the proceeds of the Bonds are subject to certain ongoing limitations relating to the use of the assets financed or provided with such proceeds ("Project Costs" or "Project Components") in the trade or business of any person or entity other than a governmental organization (any such use by a person or entity other than a governmental organization is referred to as "Private Use"). Private Use will include any sale, lease or other arrangement pursuant to which a nongovernmental person or entity receives a legal entitlement of a Project Component and also includes certain agreements pursuant to which a nongovernmental person will operate or manage a Project Component. Each quarterly invoice submitted by GRANTEE to reimburse prior expenditures (or to be received as an advance) shall provide information regarding the specific Project Costs or Project Components to which the Funds which pay that invoice will be allocated and whether there is or might be any Private Use associated with such Project Costs or Project Components. GRANTEE will, for the entire time over which LACMTA's Bonds or other debt remains outstanding, (1) notify and receive LACMTA' s approval prior to entering into any arrangement which will or might result in Private Use and (2) maintain records, including obtaining records from contractors and subcontractors as necessary, of all allocations of Funds to Project Costs or Project Components and any Private Use of such Project Costs or Project Components in sufficient detail to comply and establish compliance with Section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or similar code provision then in effect and applicable, as determined by the LACMTA in consultation with its bond counsel. GRANTEE will designate one or more persons that will be responsible for compliance with the obligations described in this Attachment F and notify LACMTA of such designations. Rev: 05.15.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment F Bond Requirements FTIP #: LAMIPMR112 ATTACHMENT G-1 SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 With regards to Part II, Paragraph 7, the following shall also apply: a. Funds allocated for each SR -710 North Mobility Improvement Project [MIP] shall be on a one-time basis. LACMTA shall not fund any cost increase. Potential cost savings shall remain in the Corridor and shall be assigned to other projects consistent with the purpose of the program as determined by LACMTA. b. Grantee is responsible for all cost overruns incurred. Under no circumstances will the total amount of money that LACMTA reimburses the Grantee exceed the amount of Funds approved by LACMTA. c. LACMTA shall reimburse Grantee up to a maximum amount of $6,000,000 as specified for the Project subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. d. LACMTA shall transfer the Funds to the Grantee on a reimbursement basis only. No advance of Funds shall be allowed. 2. With regards to Part II, Paragraph 8.2, the following shall also apply: a. LACMTA shall not be obligated to program additional funds to the Project. 3. Grantee shall conduct Before and After Studies to evaluate and document the results of project implementation in terms of congestion relief and air quality improvements. a. Grantee shall maintain proper records of the existing conditions before and after each MIP to assess the performance of the completed MIP as well as the overall program. b. A copy of the Before and After Study shall be submitted to LACMTA within six months of completion of the project construction. Measure R Funding Agreement -Highways FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 ATTACHMENT G-2 SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE (CONNECT -IT) CONSISTENCY SELF -CERTIFICATION POLICY FORM This Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (CONNECT -IT) consistency self - certification form should be completed and executed for all ITS Projects or Projects with ITS elements. The form should be sent to LACMTA for any planned ITS projects or proposed funding involving Local, State or Federal funds programmed or administered through the LACMTA. 1. Project Title: Traffic Signal Improvements (San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley) 2. Name of Sponsoring Agency: City of Rosemead 3. Contact Name: Christopher Daste, Director of Public Works 4. Contact Phone: (626) 569-2158 5. Contact Email: cdaste e,cityofrosemead.org 6. Project Description: The City plans to install left -turn phasing and overlapping right -turn phasing to improve traffic signal phasing and upgrade existing traffic signals to current standards at the following locations: Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Hellman Avenue Implement EB/WB protective left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, encroachment permit and requirements. Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Garvey Avenue Implement SB/WB right -turn overlap phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Intersection improvements may be subject to ROW availability, environmental impacts, and further studies in the design development, if found feasible, add additional SB left - turn lane. 3. Intersection at Gabriel Boulevard and Graves Avenue Implement EB/WB protected/permitted left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 4. Intersection at San Gabriel Boulevard and Rush Street Rev: 04.28.2020 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 Implement NB/SB left -turn protected phasing and EB/WB protected/permitted left - turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 5. Intersection at Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive Implement protected/permitted left -turn phasing in all directions. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 6. Intersection at Rosemead Boulevard and Lower Azusa Road Upgrade NB/SB protected left -turn phasing with new poles and left turn signals on mast arms to current standards. Currently LT poles are on medians and are not to current standards. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Rosemead Boulevard is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, encroachment permit and requirements. Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. 7. Intersection at Rosemead Boulevard and Valley Boulevard Implement NB/SB right -turn overlap phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. Rosemead Boulevard is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Work includes coordination with Caltrans, encroachment permit and requirements. Additional potential improvements may be required as part of Caltrans encroachment permit. 8. Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Muscatel Avenue Implement EB/WB protected left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 9. Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Ivar Avenue Implement EB/WB protected left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. 10. Intersection at Valley Boulevard and Mission Drive Implement EB/WB protected/permitted left -turn phasing. An old traffic signal system exists at this intersection and may require the upgrade of existing traffic signal system to current standards, which will be determined during design development. At the completion of the design phase, the City shall inform the Metro Project Manager of the number of controllers and equipment needed to upgrade the traffic signal system, and the type of traffic control system they will deploy. In addition, the City shall Rev: 04.28.2020 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 coordinate the system design through Metro staff to coordinate with other Metro - funded intersection projects and allow communication with the County of Los Angeles Information Exchange Network (IEN). 7. Identify the ITS elements being implemented and the relevant CONNECT -IT Service Package(s), see Exhibit A. Adaptive Traffic Control System and CCTV Monitoring System (TM03 — Traffic Signal Control, DM02 — Performance Monitoring); and Integration to RIITS (TM08 — Traffic Incident Management System). 8. Outline of the concept of operations for the project. The exiting traffic signal equipment along the major corridors in the City of Rosemead may require upgrades to meet current standards. The existing 170 traffic controller does not support Advance Traffic Management System (ATMS) or NextGen connected vehicle technology. The proposed traffic signal improvements will allow the City to improve traffic signal coordination and monitoring along various arterials providing real-time solutions for the residents of the City. The proposed scope of work may consist of installing single -mode fiber optic interconnect; upgrading traffic controllers to the 2070 ATC NTCIP compliance controller and new traffic signal cabinets (as needed); CCTV camera system installation; communication equipment upgrades, integration of traffic signals to a new Traffic Management Center (TMC) in the City of Rosemead Public Works; and improved traffic signal timing updates. 9. Identify participating agencies roles and responsibilities. The City of Rosemead will be fully responsible for the design and construction of the project. Although their direct involvement is not required in order to implement this project, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) will be an active participant in this project with coordination of the City's overall traffic signal management system development and integration to the Countywide information exchange network (IEN). Coordination with the LACDPW will maximize the regional arterials corridor traffic operational performance and minimize any potential conflicts. The primary contact for LACDPW is Ron Matsuoka (626-300-4822). By signing and self -certifying this form, the agency commits itself to follow the ITS requirements listed below during project design and implementation. Please be advised that your project may be subject to further review and documentation by Metro and the CONNECT -IT Maintenance Team during project design and implementation phases: Perform a lifecycle analysis for the ITS project elements and incorporate these costs into the Operations and Maintenance plan as part of the system engineering process, Rev: 04.28.2020 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 Maintain and operate the system according to the recommendations of the operations and Maintenance plan upon project completion, Use the systems engineering process and document the system engineering steps, and Use the CONNECT -IT interface standards, if required, and conform to the regional configuration management process. Signature: Christopher Daste Date Director of Public Works Rev: 04.28.2020 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 Exhibit A Architecture Reference for CONNECT -IT Service Packages The table below is the architecture reference for the CONNECT -IT service packages. For additional information on the service packages below, to view interconnect diagrams for each service package or to suggest updates to CONNECT -IT, visit www.laconnect-it.com. Service Package Area Commercial Vehicle Operations _ Data Management Maintenance and Construction Short Name CV001 Name Carrier Operations and Fleet Management_______ CV002 Freight Administration CV003 Electronic Clearance CV004 CV Administrative Processes CV005 _ International Border Electronic Clearance_ CV006 Frei ht Si nal Priori CV007 Roadside CVO Safety CV008 Smart Roadside and Virtual WIM CV009 Freight -Specific Dynamic Travel Planning CV011 _ Freight Drayage Optimization CV012 HAZMAT Management CV014_ CV Driver Security Authentication_ CV015 DM01 Fleet and Freight Security_ _ _ ITS Data Warehouse DM02 MC01 Performance Monitoring Maintenance and Construction Vehicle and Equipment Traddng MCO2 Maintenance and Construction Vehicle Maintenance MC05 Roadway Maintenance and Construction MC06 Work Zone Management MC07 Work Zone SafeMonitoring MC08 _ Maintenance and Construction Activity Coordination _ Parldng Management _ Public Safety PM01 Parkin S ace Management PM02 __ Smart Park and Ride System PM03 Parkin Electronic Payment PM04 Regional Parking Management PM05 PS01 Loading Zone Management _ Emer en Call-Taling—and Dispatch PS02 Routing Support for_Emg ncy Responders PS03 Emergency Vehicle Preemption — PSO4Mayday Notification PS05 _ Vehicle Emer enc espse _Ron PS06 _ Incident Scene Pre -Arrival Staging Guidance for Emergency Responders PS07 Incident Scene Safety Monitoring _ PS08 Roadway Service Patrols PS10 _ Wide -Area Alert PS11 Earl Warning PS12 Disaster Response and Recovery _ P S 1 3-- _ u Evacation and Reen Managemen_t PS14_ Disaster Traveler Information Rev: 04.28.2020 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 Service Padrage Area Public Transportation Short PT01 Transit Vehicle Tracking PT02 Transit Fixed -Route Operations PT03 Dynamic Transit Operations PT04 Transit Fare Collection Management _ PTO Transit Securi Transit Fleet Management _PT06 _ PT07 Transit Passenger Counting PT08 Transit Traveler Information PT09 Transit Signal Priority PT10 Intermittent Bus Lanes PT11 Transit Pedestrian Indication _ PT14 Multi -modal Coordination PT16 Route ID for the Visuall Impaired PT17 Transit Connection Protection PT18 integrated Multi -Modal Electronic P_ a hent Support SU01 Connected Vehicle System Monitoring and Management SU02 Core Authorization SU03 Data Distribution SU04 Map Management SU05 Location and Time SU06 Object Registration and Discove SU07 Privacy Protection SUO-8—Security and Credentials Management SU09 Center Maintenance SU10 Field Eq Maintenance SU11 Vehicle Maintenance SU12 Traveler Device Maintenance Sustainable Travel ST01 Emissions Monitoring ST02 Eco -Traffic Signal Timing ST03 Eco -Traffic Metering ST04 Roadside Lighting _ --S-T--05-Electric Charging Stations Management ST06 HOV HOT Lane Management ST08 Eco -Approach and Departure at Si nalized Intersections ST09 Connected Eco -Driving Traffic Management TM01 Infrastructure -Based Traffic Surveillance TM02 Vehicle -Based Traffic Surveillance _ TM03 Traffic Signal Control _ TM04 Connected Vehicle Traffic Signal System TM05 Traffic Metering Traffic Information Dissemination __TM06 TM07 Regional Traffic Management TM08 Traffic Incident Management System _ TM09 Integrated Decision Support and Demand Management TM10 Electronic Toll Collection TM11 Road Use Charging _ TM12 Roadway Warning ___ TM13 --Dynamic Standard Railroad Grade Crossing Rev: 04.28.2020 6 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000 MR43220 Service Package Area Short TM14 Advanced Railroad Grade Crossing TM15 Railroad Operations Coordination _ TM16 Reversible Lane Management TM17 Speed Warning and Enforcement_ TM19 Roadway Closure Management TM20 Variable Sped Limits TM21 Seed Harmonization TM22 D amic Lane Management and Shoulder Use Traveler Information _ TI01 Broadcast Traveler Information TI02 Personalized Traveler Information _ TI03 Dynamic Route Guidance _ T104 Infrastructure -Provided Trip Planning and Route Guidance T105 Travel Services Information and Reservation TI06 Dynamic R_idesharing and Shared Use Transportation TI07 In -Vehicle Sage _ Vehicle Safety VS01 Autonomous Vehicle SaeV S stems VS02 V2V Basic Safety VS03 V2V Situational Awareness VSO4 V2V Special Vehicle Alert VS05 Curve Speed Warning _ VS08 Queue Warning _ VS09 Reduced Speed Zone Warning Lane Closure VS10 Restricted Lane Warnings VS11 Oversize Vehicle Warning VS12 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safe VS 13 Intersection Safety Warning and Collision Avoidance VS14 Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control _ VS15 Infrastructure Enhanced Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control _ VS16 Automated Vehicle Operations VS17 Traffic Code Dissemination Note .• CONNECT-ITsemce packagesmayditgerfrom sezwce packagesidenti&edm the Nationd ITS Reference Architecture (ARC -ITS. For anyservice packagesnotrepresented m CONNECT -IT, refer to ARC -IT by accessing www arc itnet. Contact the administrator at sbarmasametro net for questions Nqqr&:ng CONNECT -IT Rev: 04.28.2020 7 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 ATTACHMENT G-3 SPECIAL GRANT CONDITIONS SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION, INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS), AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS 1. Grantee is required to attend the LACMTA Arterial ITS Committee Meetings quarterly. Grantee shall coordinate through the Arterial ITS Committee, the Coalition for Transportation Technology and/or other appropriate and recognized forums to ensure consistency with local, subregional and regional ITS plans. Grantee shall provide the opportunity to LACMTA staff and other affected agencies to review, comment and participate on all aspects of the Project implementation to achieve multi -jurisdictional consensus, including, but not limited to, scope of work, consultant selection, PS&E, system design, bid documents and Project deliverables. 2. Grantee shall coordinate with LA County DPW when applicable and shall not advertise the Project for bid to begin construction before all affected agencies have fully executed an agreement regarding the maintenance and operation of traffic signal synchronization system(s) along multi -jurisdictional corridor(s). Grantee shall deliver or email a copy of the fully executed agreement to LACMTA within seven (7) days from the date of full execution. 3. Grantee shall commit and/or secure non-LACMTA funds to maintain and operate the Project improvements. Operations and maintenance plans shall be developed for all ITS projects. For multi -jurisdictional projects, multi -agency agreements shall be executed committing to the long-term operations and maintenance of shared project elements. 4. Grantee's Project shall not make major equipment or timing -plan changes on other Metro funded projects, within the first two years of Grantee's Project implementation/system operation without LACMTA or lead agency prior written approval. 5. For all central traffic control system projects, Grantee shall coordinate the system design through LACMTA staff to allow communication with the Los Angeles County Information Exchange Network (IEN) to facilitate multi -jurisdictional traffic management and coordination. 6. Grantee shall ensure Countywide Signal Priority (CSP) capabilities are maintained when Grantee's Project is on an existing CSP corridor. 7. Grantee shall make available all data from the Project, including, without limitation, improvements and inventory data, to LACMTA upon request. Grantee shall: a. provide real-time traffic data from the Project, if available, to the County IEN Rev: 09.08.2020 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions FTIP#: LAMIPMR112 Project#: MR4.3.2.20 FA# 9200000000MR43220 b. allow for archiving through the Regional Integration of ITS (RIITS) Network or any regional ITS software to support regional transportation planning and operations c. populate ITS Field Inventory Resource Sharing Tool (ITS FIRST) with data upon completion of project 8. Grantee shall ensure that the project uses a generally accepted system engineering approach to maintain the integrity and quality of completed projects. 9. Grantee's project shall adhere to existing Metro guidelines for specific subprograms as applicable. The obligations set forth in this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Rev: 09.08.2020 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment G Special Grant Conditions Attachment I Key Provision from L.A. Metro's Grant Agreement KEY PROVISIONS FROM THE L.A. METRO GRANT AGREEMENT: Part T: 3. This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter's expenditures. LACMTA will withhold five percent (5%) of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work, Pant H: S. REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS Funds will be released on a reimbursement basis in accordance with invoices submitted in support ofthe Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports, LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. Reimbursements via Automated Clearing House (ACH) will be made at no cost to GRANTEE. GRANTEE must complete the ACH form and submit such form to LACMTA before grant payments can be made. ACH Request Forms can be found at www.metro.net/projects/call projects/call projects-referenr&. docu� GRANTEE must provide detailed supporting documentation with its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any, must be spent in direct proportion to the Funds with each quarter's payment. .... Attachm.exnt_C:... ... ..._ ... .... ...... . . . .. ........ ........ ..... IV. Project Management Grantee expects to provide overall project and program management, funding management through its in-house staff, and by using its in-house, already approved, engineering consultant. RIGHT-OF-WAY: At this point, all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W. CONSTRUCTION: The construction contract will be bid out per Public Contract Code and City requirements. Grantee expects to provide construction management, inspection, contract administration, funding management through its in-house staff, and by using its in-house, already approved, engineering consultant. Attachment J Fiscal Year Cash Flow Program Chart . a,o■,PROJ�■ _m § $ � I| | ® I | �§ �� �2 � 2$§§I$■� �■f� ! �■f� I � § ■ § ■ \ JL— § g --L. § \ 2 � § § \ § § STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) CITY OF ROSEMEAD ) I, Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution, No. 2021-17, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27a' day of April, 2021, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk Attachment K Resolution No. 2021-17 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE FY 2020-21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET TO INCLUDE THE CITY'S FOUR (4) 710 NORTH MOBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE FOUR (4) 710 NORTH MOBILITY PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AND THE LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) adopted Ordinance #08-01, the Traffic Relief and Rail Expansion Ordinance, on July 24, 2008 (the "Ordinance"), which Ordinance was approved by the voters of Los Angeles County on November 4, 2008 as "Measure R" and became effective on January 2, 2009; and WHEREAS, $780,000,000 in Measure R funds was identified in Line 36 of the Measure R Expenditure Plan for the SR -710 North Gap Closure [tunnel] Project [SR -710 North]; and WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board at its May 25, 2017 meeting, reallocated the remaining Measure R Funds for the SR -710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion, if consistent with the purpose and need ofthe Gap Closure Projectto relieve congestion on local streets alongthe SR -710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway; and WHEREAS, the City has applied for and received funding approval in the amount of $27,000,000 from LACMTA to implement four (4) new mobility improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the four (4) Funding Agreements (FA) with LACMTA must be executed before invoices can be reimbursed: 1) FA #9200000000MR41208 (I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements; and 2) FA #9200000000MR41209 (I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements; and 3) FA #9200000000MR43219 (Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project—Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead); and 4) FA #9200000000MR43220 (Traffic Signal Improvements — San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley); NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the four (4) Funding Agreements for the 710 North Mobility Improvement projects awarded to the City by LACMTA and amends the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Capital Improvement Program budget to include the City's four projects: 1. I-10/Rosemead Boulevard Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements inthe amount of $6,000,000; and 2. I-10/Walnut Grove Avenue Freeway [Westbound] Ramp Improvements in the amount of $6,000,000; and 3. Rosemead Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project—Garvey, Valley, San Gabriel, Walnut Grove and Rosemead in the amount of $9,000,000; and 4. Traffic Signal Improvements— San Gabriel Walnut Grove at Mission, Rosemead and Valley in the amount of $6,000,000 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and hereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27a' day of April, 2021. Polly Low, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: Rachel Richman, City Attorney Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk