Loading...
CC - 2000-34 - Objections to the Proposed Redevelopment Plan For Project Area No 2a ! RESOLUTION NO. 2000-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD RULING ON WRITTEN AND ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 2 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for the Rosemead Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Rosemead Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency"); and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2000, a duly noticed joint public hearing on the proposed Plan was conducted by the City Council and the Agency; and WHEREAS, any and all persons having any objections to the proposed Plan or who deny the existence of blight in the Project Area, or the regularity of the prior proceedings, were given an opportunity to submit written comments prior to the commencement of the joint public hearing, or give oral testimony at the joint public hearing, and show cause why the proposed Plan should not be adopted; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard and considered all evidence, both written and oral, presented in support of and in opposition to the adoption of the Plan for the Rosemead Redevelopment Project Area No. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rosemead as follows: Section 1: The City Council finds on the basis of the substantial evidence contained within the Report to the City Council submitted by the Rosemead Redevelopment Agency and other substantial evidence in the record that conditions of blight exist within the Rosemead Redevelopment Project Area No. 2, and that written and oral evidence in opposition received prior to and at the joint public hearing is not persuasive to the contrary. Section 1. The City Council and the Agency have duly complied with all the provisions, requirements, and procedures of Section 33202 and Articles 4 and 4.5 (commencing with Section 33330) of Chapter 4 of the California Community Redevelopment Law relating to the preparation and adoption of the Plan for the Rosemead Redevelopment Project Area No. 2. • • Section 3: The City Council accordingly adopts the written responses set forth in the staff report to the written comments received and overrules all objections to the adoption of the Plan for the Rosemead Redevelopment Project Area No. 2. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27`h day of June 2000. Attest: 2224~=44u~ c 1c_ MAYOR City STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF ROSEMEAD I, Nancy Valderrama, City Clerk of the City of Rosemead, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-34 being: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD RULING ON WRITTEN AND ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA 2 was duty adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 27`" day of June, 2000, by the following vote to wit: YES: COUNCILMEMBERS: VASQUEZ, BRUESCH, CLARK, IMPERIAL, TAYLOR NO: COUNCILME MBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE NANCY V LDERRAMA, CITY CLERIC _ AGENDA:CERTIFY 0 0