CC - 1999-35 - Congestion Management Program (CMP) and Adopting the CMP Local Implementation ReportRESOLUTION 99-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA,
FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.(CMP) AND
ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT.,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65089
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA"),
acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1995
Congestion Management Program in November, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the
County and Cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP local
implementation report by September 1 of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council had a noticed public hearing on August 24, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Rosemead
does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the City has taken all the following actions, and that the City is
in conformance with the applicable requirements of the 1995 CMP.
By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City will conduct annual traffic counts and
calculated levels of service for several arterial intersections, consistent with the
requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand
management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP
Transportation Demand Management Chapter.
.The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis
program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use
Analysis Program Chapter.
The City adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made a part
hereof, consistent with the requirements in the CMP. This report balances traffic
congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements, and
demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities underthe Countywide Deficiency
Plan.
r1
i. J
0
Section 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 24 h day of August, 1999
ATTEST:
CiTY CLER
•
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
I, Nancy Valderrama, City Clerk of the City of Rosemead, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 99-35 being:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD,
FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL
IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089
was duly adopted at a Regular Meeting of the Rosemead City Council on the 24th day of August,
1999, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
CLARK, BRUESCH, IMPERIAL, VASQUEZ, TAYLOR
NOES:
NONE
ABSTAIN:
NONE
ABSENT:
NONE
NANCY V DERRAMA
AGENDA:CERTIFY
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Date Prepared:
05-Aug-99
1999 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1998 - MAY 31,1999
Contact: MR. KEN RUKAVINA, P.E.
Phone Number: 626-288-6671
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEFICIENCY . SU
MMARY*
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal
[from Section 1)
(624)
Exempted Dwelling Units
0
Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,0003)
0
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims
[from Section III
1,294
Land Use Strategy Claims
0
Capital Improvement Claims
1
Transit Claims
2
TDM Claims
2
Total Strategies Claimed
5
Subtotal Current Credit (Goal)
670
.3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (1997)
Local Implementation Report
5,397
Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance:
6,067
Section I, Page 1
•
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 05-Aug-99
1999 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1998 - MAY 31,1999
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
PART 1 "NEW, DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
Dwelling
Units
Debit Debits
Value/DU
Single Family Residential
33.00
x 6.80 - 224
Multi-Family Residential
0.00
x 4.76 - 0
Group Quarters
0.00
x 1.98 - 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit Debits
Value/1000SF
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.)
12.60
x 22.23 - 280
Commercial 1300,000 sq.ft. or more)
0.00
x 17.80 - 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
0.00
x 66.99- 0
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
.1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit Debits
Value/1000SF
Lodging
0.00
x 7.21 = 0
Industrial
102.60
x 6.08 - 624
Office (less than 50,000 s .ft.)
0.70
x 16.16 - 11
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.)
0.00
x 10.50 - 0
Office (300,000 s .ft. or more)
0.00
x 7.35 - 0
Medical
0.00
x 16.90 - 0
Government
0.00
x 20.95 - 0
Institutional/Educational
0.00
x 7.68 - 0
University
0.00
x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Daily Trips
(Enter "0" if none)
Debit Debits
Value/Trip
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x 0.71 - 0
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 11
0.00
x 0.71 = 0
Subtotal New Development Activity - 1,140
Adjustments (Optional) - Complete Part 2 0 = 516
Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points) _ (624)
Section I, Page 2
•
•
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 05-Aug-99
1999 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 1998 - MAY 31,1999
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter "0" so it will total.
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS--,
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that
were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and
2) demolition of an structure within the reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL. DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
Dwelling
'Units
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/DU
Single Family Residential
16.00
x 6.80 = 109
Multi-Family Residential
0.00
x 4.76 = 0
Group Quarters
0.00
x 1.98 - 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment - Subtotal
Value/1000SF
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.)
18.30 x 22.23 - 407
Commercial (300,000 s .ft. or more)
0.00 x 17.80 - 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
0.00 x 66.99 - 0
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/1000SF
Lodging
0.00
x 7.21 = 0
Industrial
0.00
x 6.08 - 0
Office (less than 50,000 s .ft.)
0.00
x 16.16 - 0
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.)
0.00
x 10.50 - 0
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
0.00
x 7.35 - 0
Medical
0.00
x 16.90 - 0
Government
0.00
x 20.95 - 0
Institutional/Educational
0.00
x 7.68 - 0
University
0.00
x 1.66 - 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Daily Trips
(Enter "o" if None)
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/Trip
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x 0.71 = 0
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x 0.71 = 0
Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 516
Section I, Page 3
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
1999 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1998 - MAY 31,1999
Date Prepared: 05-Aug-99
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
T INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
Lowery Low Income Housing Dwelling Units
High Density Residential
near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments
near Rail Stations
Development Agreements entered
into Prior to July 10, 1989
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake
Total Dwelling Units
al sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
1 :0] Dwelling Units
1000 Gross Square Feet
Dwelling Units
01 1000 Gross Square Feet
0
0 Dwelling Units
P1000 Gross Square Feet
0 Dwelling Units
1000 Gross Square Feet
0 Dwelling Units
1. Low/Very Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and
Community Development as follows:
Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail -
passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential
density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a
minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development
is used for high density residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under
Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or
destroyed, to the extent of not less than 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake
or other similar calamity.
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning
regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval
authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR.
Section 1, Page 4
•
0
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared:
1999 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1998 - MAY 31,1999
SECTION Il.b - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS
05-A„g-99
Total Cap. Imp. Projects: 1 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points):
1,208
1
2
3 Signal synch, sum & control on 4-lane CMP Arterial
5. Scope
6. Units
t
242.1
4 Valley Boulevard Communication Conduit
0.8
route-mile
7. Str. Name: Valley Boulevard
8. From/To: Walnut Grove Ave/Rosemead Blvd
9. Intersection: na 10. Map Page:
596
11. Participants: None
12. MTA Funding: 0%
13. Your share of local funding:
100%
14. Portion of Project within your jurisdiction:
100%
15. Other Info: Enter
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
3220.00
2,415
2001
$86
100%
2
0
50%
1,208
Section II.b, Page 1
• •
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 05-Aug-99
1999 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1998 - MAY 31,1999
SECTION Il.d - TRANSIT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Transit Proiects: 2 Total Transit Credit (Points): 41
1 2 I 3 Dail-A-Ride Service 15. Scope: 6. Units:
1 364.00 4 Rosemead Dial-A-Ride 21 PMT
I
_
11. First Year of Service:
12. Prior credits for ridership:
13. Milestone Reached:
14. Milestone Percent Factor:
15. Annual Operating Cost 11,
16. Percent Funded Locally:
17. If commuter rail feeder ser
18. If urban rail feeder service:
19. Prior credits for rail boardir
xpresc 8. Local 9. Shuttle 10. DialaRide Total Credits
0 0 2_ 1 49
7.7 3.3 1.0 4.5
0 0 0 221 221
1982
200
2 Erner a zero'. t o t for i'
100% all bl to fn if entnes
335 ifthe question Is not
100% a licabl6: the
20. Net 1998 Credit Value: 21
1
1
2 3 Local Shuttle - S. Scope: 6. Units:
365.00 4 Rosemead Shuttle 20 PMT
1T ~A.... >
7. Express
8. Local
9. Shuttle
10. DialaRide Total
Credits
Current Avg Weekday Ridership:
0
0
244
0
Credit Factor (avg. miles per rider):
7.7
3.3
1.0
4.5
Avg. Daily PMT:
0
0
244
0 244
11. First Year of Service: 1986
12. Prior credits for ridership: 224
13. Milestone Reached: 2
Enter a zer0(0 1 tnr.
"
14. Milestone Percent Factor: - 100%
a8 blue fontentries
15. Annual Operating Cost: 164
ifahe question is not
16. Percent Funded Locally: 100%
i. applicable or the
17. If commuter rail feeder service: 0
answer is. unknown.
18. If urban rail feeder service: 0
19. Prior credits for rail boardings: 0
20. Net 1998 Credit Value: 20
Section Il.d, Page 1
0
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared:
05-Aug-99
1999 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 1998 - MAY 31,1999
SECTION II.e - TDM CREDIT CLAIMS
Total TDM Projects: 2 Total TDMCredit (Points):
46
.(~\.....dS'.. ).i. ...........i.... ...1..:2...:.1
1 321.0 CMP TDM Ordinance
115.90 1000 sf
Non-Residential building permits issued, as reported in Section I
No other description/entries required for this strategy. This is alread
y done for you.
16 .17 18 19 20 21 22
23
24
a
0.30 35 n/a n/a 100% 3 n/
100%
35
y_._:~\\\~ y.:W
$
y
y
.~H~~.✓: ~~riJi. I"2..... ..~1...'~vI` .>`L..cn._ <,,~},R ~JKYT~ '2~' y✓/'J>S~FY~KC~...~~\\.~.~.~W. ~2a.~.i.>."~u~wRa'^".K~.RS~S
1
2 3 'Subsidy of 60-69%, Resident Program
5. Scope:
6. Units:
2
331.26 4 Transit Subsidy Program
1
100 users
Enter zero
(09 if yuesUdn does ntu `apply
7. Total employees in program: 1,194
8. Total employers: 1
9. Operator of Transit Service: MTA
10. Percent of Total Fare Subsidized: 67%
11. Net Gain avg monthly participants: 36
12. Facility/Center Address: no
13. Deily Parking Rate: -$0.00
14. Fee Increase: $0.00
15. Otherlnfo:
16
17
18
19
20 _
21
22
23
24
59.50
60
1999
$117
100%
3
49
100%
11
Section Il.e, Page 1
9 0