CC - 1961 - 21 - Annexation Area No. 14RESOLUTION N0. 61-21
''RESOLUTION 01VING..NOTICE;,O PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO,.CITY OFROSEMEAD bF,T AT CzRTAI UNINHABITED
RITORY DESCRIBED; IT AISD DF$ GNATED "CITY,
TER No. -14I
AND GIVING
OF ROSEMEAD.ANNEXQTI0"N,A 4
NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF PROTESTS
THE CITY .COUNCIL
AS FOLLOWS.
+'Annexat on of.U
_S
the City, Council
does hereby init
City of Rosemead
designat
describE
OF THE CITY OF RO$EMEAD DONS HEREBY RESOLVE
it 'pursuant to the pi•ovi
contiguous to the City. of Ros
of Rosemead Annexation Area No
yin's , of, the
it as ;amended,
mn. motion .
on o the.
.ri pry; that
V . is hereby
" and is
d as follows:
Aji.ihat property in the County of Los Angeles, State
of Californiaj bounded and described as follows:
B ginnin t the intersection of the easterly prolonga-
tion of ~ line which is parallel with and distant
southerly 160 feet, measured at right angles, from the
northerly line of Lot 5 of Tract No. 830, as per map
recorded in Book 16, page 117 of Maps, in the office
of the County Recorder of said county, with the
westerly boundary of the City of Rosemead, as said
boundary existed on March 3, 1961; thence westerly
along said prolongation and said parallel line to a
line which is parallel with the westerly line of said
Lot 5 and passes through a point in the northerly line
of said Lot 5, distant thereon easterly 660 feet from
the northwest corner of said Lot 5, (said last men-
tioned parallel line is shown on Licensed Surveyor's
Map as per map filed in Book 32, page 17, of Records
of Survey in the office of the recorder of said county);
thence southerly along said last mentioned parallel
line to the southerly line of said Lot 5; thence
westerly along said southerly line to the southwest
corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along the
westerly line of Lot 6 of said Tract No. 830 to the
southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence easterly along
the southerly line of said Lot 6 and the easterly
prolongation thereof, to the center line of River Ave-
nue, 60 feet wide, as shown on map of said Tract No.
830; thence southerly along said center line to the
northwesterly prolongation of the southwesterly line
of land described in deed recorded in Book 15915,
page 64 of Official Records of said county; thence
southeasterly along said northwesterly prolongation
and said southwesterly line to the southerly line of
Lot 14 of said Tract No. 830; thence easterly along
said southerly line of Lot 14 and the southerly line
of Lot 13 of said Tract No. 830 to the westerly
boundary of the City of South E1 Monte, as said
boundary existed on March 3, 1961; thence northerly
along said boundary of the City of South E1 Monte to
an angle point in the southerly boundary of the City
of Rosemead, as said boundary existed on March 3,
1961; thence westerly and northerly along the boundary
of the City of Rosemead, as said boundary existed on
March 3, 1961, to the point of beginning.
SECTION 2. That the County Boundary Commission of
Los Angeles County, California, did in session duly assembled
on March 22, 1961, approve the proposed annexation boundaries
of said "City of Rosemead Annexation Area No. 14" duly sub-
mitted to said Commission:
SECTION 30 That the City Council of the City of Rosemead
desires to annex said territory for the reasons that it is con- .
tiguous_to-the.City oۥ Rosemead` and.ita anaexation.will icontribute
to the growth and development_of.both the City of Rosemead and
of said territory.
SECTION 4. that may 9, 1961) at 8t00.o'clock P4, Mi of
said day, at,3954 North Rosemead Boulevard, City of Rosemead;.
County of Los Angeleaj,$tate of Californid, is hereby fixed as
the time and pplace wh p.end where any person-owning redl.prb-
petty within the uninhabited territory above'described;dnd:
proposed to be annexed to the City of Rosemead and having Any
objections to the.pr6pbsed annexation may appear before the
Council of the City of Rosemead and show cause why such uiiin-
habited..tetfitory should not be so annexed to said City.of.
Rosemead,. Subh Protcst,must be in writing,.+ maybe filed at
.any time before the hour set f6t hearing objections to the,
proposed annexation and shall state the name or ndmes of the
owner or owners of property affected and the description and
area of such propertyin general terms.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk of the City of Rosemead is
hereby aut or ze and directed to cause a copy of this resolu-
tion to be published at least twice, but not oftener than once
a week in the Rosemead Review, a newspaper of general circula-
tion published in the City of Rosemead and in the Alhambra Post-
Advocate, a newspaper of general circulation published outside
the City of Rosemead but in the County of Los Angeles, California,
the county in which is located the territory proposed to be an-
nexed to the City of Rosemead, said publication to be complete
at least twenty (20) days prior to the date set for hearing.
And the said City Clerk is further authorized and
directed to cause written notice of such proposed annexation
to be mailed to each person to whom land within the territory
proposed to be annexed is assessed in the last equalized
county assessment roll available on the date the above said
proceedings were initiated, at the addresses shown on said
assessment roll or known to said Clerk, and to any person who
has filed his name and address and the designation of the lands
in which he has an interest, either legal or equitable, with
said Clerk, such notice to be given not less than twenty (20)
days before the first public hearing on the proposed annexation.
And the said city Clerk is directed to cause written
notice to be given to such other persons as may be legally
entitled thereto, in the manner required by law.
ADOPTED this 28th day of March, 1961, by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmen -
NOES: Councilmen -
ABSENT: Councilmen -
ANDERSEN, JACKMAN, LOWREY,
PHINNEY, STEAD.
None.
None.
1 MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK