CC - Item 1B - Rosemead User Fee Study ReportCITY OF ROSEM EAD
W7, w R
P71. . 7Y�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................i
Executive Summary..................................................................................................1
User Fee Background...............................................................................................2
Background..................................................................................................................................................2
CaliforniaUser Fee History..........................................................................................................................2
Additional Policy Considerations.................................................................................................................3
StudyObjective.......................................................................................................4
Scopeof the Study.......................................................................................................................................4
Aimof the Report.........................................................................................................................................5
Project Approach and Methodology...........................................................................6
ConceptualApproach...................................................................................................................................6
FullyBurdened Hourly Rates........................................................................................................................6
SummarySteps of the Study........................................................................................................................7
AllowableCosts............................................................................................................................................7
Methodology................................................................................................................................................8
Quality Control/Quality Assurance..............................................................................................................8
Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees.............................................................................8
CityStaff Contributions................................................................................................................................9
Rosemead User Fees..............................................................................................
10
CostRecovery.............................................................................................................................................10
Subsidization..............................................................................................................................................10
Impacton Demand (Elasticity)...................................................................................................................11
Summary....................................................................................................................................................11
Finance................................................................................................................
12
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................12
CityClerk..............................................................................................................
13
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................13
Planning...............................................................................................................
14
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................14
Engineering..........................................................................................................
15
-afWILLDAN i Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aV E,
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................15
Parksand Recreation............................................................................................ 16
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................16
PublicTransportation........................................................................................... 17
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................17
Parking................................................................................................................ 18
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................18
AnimalCare and Control...................................................................................... 19
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................19
PublicSafety........................................................................................................ 20
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................20
FilmPermit..........................................................................................................21
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................21
CivilFines........................................................................................................... 22
Analysis......................................................................................................................................................22
Appendix A — Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered .................................................. 23
Appendix B — Fully Burdened Hourly Rates............................................................... 24
Appendix C — Cost Recovery Analysis....................................................................... 26
-afWILLDAN ii Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Executive Summary
The City of Rosemead engaged Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) to determine the full costs incurred by
the City to support the various activities for which the City charges user fees. Due to the complexity and
the breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fees, Willdan employed a variety of fee
methodologies to identify the full costs of individual fee and program activities. This report and the
appendices herein identifies 100% full cost recovery for City services and the recommended level of
recovery as determined through discussion with departmental staff.
The reality of the local government fee environment is that significant increases to achieve 100% cost
recovery can often not be feasible, desirable, or appropriate depending on policy direction —particularly in
a single year. The recommended fees identified herein are either at or less than full cost recovery.
-afWILLDAN 1 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
User Fee Background
Background
As part of a general cost recovery strategy, local governments adopt user fees to fund programs and services
that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as a whole. As cities struggle to maintain levels
of service and variability of demand, they have become increasingly aware of subsidies provided by the
General Fund and have implemented cost -recovery targets. To the extent that governments use general
tax monies to provide individuals with private benefits, and not require them to pay the full cost of the
service (and, therefore, receive a subsidy), the government is limiting funds that may be available to provide
other community -wide benefits. In effect, the government is using community funds to pay for private
benefit. Unlike most revenue sources, cities have more control over the level of user fees they charge to
recover costs, or the subsidies they can institute.
Fees in California are required to conform to the statutory requirements of the California Constitution,
Proposition 218, and the California Code of Regulations. The Code also requires that the City Council adopt
fees by either ordinance or resolution, and that any fees in excess of the estimated total cost of rendering
the related services must be approved by a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting because the
charge would be considered a tax and not a fee.
California User Fee History
Before Proposition 13, California cities were less concerned with potential subsidies and recovering the cost
of their services from individual fee payers. In times of fiscal shortages, cities simply raised property taxes,
which funded everything from police and recreation to development -related services. However, this
situation changed with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.
Proposition 13 established the era of revenue limitation in California local government. In subsequent years,
the state saw a series of additional limitations to local government revenues. Proposition 4 (1979) defined
the difference between a tax and a fee: a fee can be no greater than the cost of providing the service; and
Proposition 218 (1996) further limited the imposition of taxes for certain classes of fees. As a result, cities
were required to secure a supermajority vote in order to enact or increase taxes. Since the public continues
to resist efforts to raise local government taxes, cities have little control and very few successful options for
new revenues. Compounding this limitation, the State of California took a series of actions in the 1990's
and 2000's to improve the State's fiscal situation—at the expense of local governments. As an example, in
2004-05, the Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds ("ERAF") take -away of property taxes and the
reduction of Vehicle License Fees have severely reduced local tax revenues.
In addition, on November 2, 2010, California voters approved Proposition 26, the "Stop Hidden Taxes
Initiative", which is aimed at defining "regulatory fees" as a special tax rather than a fee, thus requiring
approval by two-thirds vote of local voters. These regulatory fees are typically intended to mitigate the
societal and environmental impacts of a business or person's activities. Proposition 26 contains seven
categories of exceptions. The fees analyzed as part of this study fell under categories one through five
consisting of charges for specific benefits, government service, regulatory need, for use of government
property, or a fine/penalty.
-afWILLDAN 2 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aV<..
Additional Policy Considerations
The recent trend for municipalities is to update their fee schedules to reflect the actual costs of certain
public services primarily benefitting users. User Fees recover costs associated with the provision of specific
services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes.
In addition to collecting the direct cost of labor and materials associated with processing and administering
user services, it is common for local governments to recover support costs. Support costs are those costs
relating to a local government's central service departments that are properly allocable to the local
government's operating departments. Central services support cost allocations were incorporated using
the resulting indirect overhead percentages determined through the Cost Allocation Plan. This plan was
developed prior to the User Fee study to determine the burden placed upon central services by the
operating departments in order to allocate a proportionate share of central service cost.
As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element
in the development of any fee schedule is that it has the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, it is
recommended that the City include an inflationary factor in the resolution adopting the fee schedule to
allow the City Council, by resolution, to annually increase or decrease the fees.
The City may employ many different inflationary factors. The most commonly used inflator is some form
of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as it is widely well known and accepted. A similar inflator is the implicit
price deflator for GDP, which is much like the CPI except that while the CPI is based on the same "basket"
of goods and services every year, the price deflators' "basket" can change year to year. Since the primary
factor for the cost of a City's services is usually the costs of the personnel involved, tying an inflationary
factor that connects more directly to the personnel costs can be suitable if there is a clear method, or
current practice of obtaining said factor.
Each City should use an inflator that they believe works the best for their specific situation and needs. It is
also recommended that the City perform this internal review annually with a comprehensive review of
services and fees performed every three to five years, which would include adding or removing fees for any
new or eliminated programs/services.
-afWILLDAN 3 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Study Objective
As the City of Rosemead seeks to efficiently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increased
service demands, it needs a variety of tools. These tools provide assurance that the City has the best
information and the best resources available to make sound decisions, fairly and legitimately set fees,
maintain compliance with state law and local policies, and meet the needs of the City administration and
its constituency. Given the limitations on raising revenue in local government, the City recognizes that a
User Fee Study is a very cost-effective way to understand the total cost of services and identify potential
fee deficiencies. Essentially, a User Fee is a payment fora requested service provided by a local government
that primarily benefits an individual or group.
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is based on the full cost of providing City services,
including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central
service support. This study determines the full cost recovery fee for the City to provide each service;
however, each fee is set at the City's discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in this report.
The principal goal of the study was to help the City determine the full cost of the services that the City
provides. In addition, Willdan established a series of additional objectives including:
• Developing a rational basis for setting fees
• Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model
• Ensuring compliance with State law
• Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees
• Maintaining accordance with City policies and goals
The study results will help the City better understand its true costs of providing services and may serve as
a basis for making informed policy decisions regarding the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect from
individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the City.
Scope of the Study
The scope of this study encompasses a review and calculation of the user fees charged by the following
Rosemead departments and fee groups:
• Finance
• City Clerk
• Planning
• Engineering
• Parks and Recreation
• Public Transportation
• Parking
• Animal Care and Control
• Public Safety
-afWILLDAN 4 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,,.aV<.,
Film
• Civil Fines
The study involved the identification of existing and potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data
collection and analysis, orientation and consultation, quality control, communication and presentations,
and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels.
Aim of the Report
The User Fee Study focused on the cost of City services, as City staff currently provides them at existing,
known, or reasonably anticipated service and staff levels. This report provides a summary of the study
results, and a general description of the approach and methods Willdan and City staff used to determine
the recommended fee schedule. The report is not intended to document all of the numerous discussions
throughout the process, nor is it intended to provide influential dissertation on the qualities of the utilized
tools, techniques, or other approaches.
-afWILLDAN 5 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Project Approach and Methodology
Conceptual Approach
The basic concept of a User Fee Study is to determine the "reasonable cost' of each service provided by
the City for which it charges a user fee. The full cost of providing a service may not necessarily become the
City's fee, but it serves as the objective basis as to the maximum amount that may be collected.
The standard fee limitation established in California law for property -related (non -discretionary) fees is the
"estimated, reasonable cost" principle. In order to maintain compliance with the letter and spirit of this
standard, every component of the fee study process included a related review. The use of budget figures,
time estimates, and improvement valuation clearly indicates reliance upon estimates for some data.
Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
(FBHRs) that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing services. The FBHRs include
not only personnel salary and benefits, but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The
cost elements that are included in the calculation of fully burdened rates are:
• Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
• Operating costs applicable to fee operations
• Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead
• Indirect City-wide overhead costs calculated through the Cost Allocation Plan
An important factor in determining the fully burdened rate is in the calculation of productive hours for
personnel. This calculation takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this figure to
account for calculated or anticipated hours' employees are involved in non -billable activities such as paid
vacation, sick leave, emergency leave, holidays, and other considerations as necessary. Dividing the full cost
by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.
The FBHRs are then used in conjunction with time estimates, when appropriate, to calculate a fee's cost
based on the personnel and the amount of their time that is involved in providing each service.
-afWILLDAN 6 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Summary Steps of the Study
The methodology to evaluate most User Fee levels is straightforward and simple in concept. The following
list provides a summary of the study process steps:
Allowable Costs
Define the Full Cost of
Services
s
Set Cost Recovery Policy
This report identifies three types of costs that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a
service (Appendix A). Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City's
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee -related
services.
Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function.
Central Services Overhead: These costs, detailed in the City's Cost Allocation Plan, represent
services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary function is to support
other City departments.
-afWILLDAN 7 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aV<..
Department
Interviews
Direct Services
tTime
Estimate
I
s
Indirect Services
Labor Costs
Department Overhead
Ilk
Cost Allocation Plan
[City
-Wide Overhead
Allowable Costs
Define the Full Cost of
Services
s
Set Cost Recovery Policy
This report identifies three types of costs that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a
service (Appendix A). Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City's
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee -related
services.
Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function.
Central Services Overhead: These costs, detailed in the City's Cost Allocation Plan, represent
services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary function is to support
other City departments.
-afWILLDAN 7 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aV<..
Methodology
The two methods of analysis for calculating fees used in this report are the:
Case Study Method (Standard Unit Cost Build -Up Approach): This approach estimates the actual
labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis is suitable
when City staff time requirements do not vary dramatically for a service, or for special projects where the
time and cost requirements are easy to identify at the project's outset. Further, the method is effective in
instances when a staff member from one department assists on an application, service or permit for
another department on an as -needed basis. Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff
regarding the time typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.
Programmatic Approach: In some instances, the underlying data is not available or varies widely, leaving
a standard unit cost build-up approach impractical. In addition, market factors and policy concerns (as
opposed to actual costs) tend to influence fee levels more than other types of services. Willdan employed
a different methodology where appropriate to fit the programs' needs and goals. Typical programmatic
approach cases are facility use fees, penalties, and instances where a program cost is divided over the user
base to obtain a per applicant cost for shared cost services.
Quality Control/Quality Assurance
All study components are interrelated, thus flawed data at any step in the process will cause the ultimate
results to be inconsistent and unsound. The elements of our Quality Control process for User Fee
calculations include:
• Involvement of knowledgeable City staff
• Clear instructions and guidance to City staff
• Reasonableness tests and validation
• Normalcy/expectation ranges
• Internal and external reviews
• Cross-checking
Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees
Within the fee tables in Appendix C, the differences are identified between the full costs calculated
through the study and the fee levels currently in effect. The reasons for differences between the two can
arise from a number of possible factors including:
• Previous fee levels may have been set at levels less than full cost intentionally, based on policy
decisions
• Staffing levels and the positions that complete fee and service activity may vary from when the
previous costs were calculated
• Personnel and materials costs could have increased at levels that differed from any inflationary
factors used to increase fees since the last study
-afWILLDAN 8 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aV<..
• Costs that this study has identified as part of the full cost of services may not have been accounted
for in a previous study
o Departmental overhead and administration costs
o Vehicle and Facility Maintenance support costs
o Indirect overhead from the Cost Allocation Plan
• Changes in processes and procedures within a department, or the City as a whole
City Staff Contributions
As part of the study process, Willdan received tremendous support and cooperation from City staff, which
contributed and reviewed a variety of components to the study, including:
• Budget and other cost data
• Staffing structures
• Fee and service structures, organization, and descriptions
• Direct and indirect work hours (billable/non-billable)
• Time estimates to complete work tasks
• Review of draft results and other documentation
A User Fee Study requires significant involvement of the managers and line staff from the departments—
on top of their existing workloads and competing priorities. The contributions from City staff were critical
to this study. We would like to express our appreciation to the City and its staff for their assistance,
professionalism, positive attitudes, helpful suggestions, responsiveness, and overall cooperation.
-afWILLDAN 9 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Rosemead User Fees
Cost Recovery
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in Appendix C. Full cost
recovery is determined by summing the estimated amount of time each position (in increments of minutes
or hours) spends to render a service. Time estimates for each service rendered were predominately
determined by Willdan and City Staff through a time and materials survey conducted for each
department/division fee included in the study. The resulting cost recovery amount represents the total cost
of providing each service. The City's current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in
this section, as well, for reference.
It is important to note that the time and materials survey used to determine the amount of time each
employee spends assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential in
identifying the total cost of providing each service. Specifically, in providing services, a number of
employees are often involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to
several hours on the service.
A primary goal of this study was to identify the cost of City services, to provide information to help the City
make informed decisions regarding the actual fee levels and charges. The responsibility to determine the
final fee levels is a complicated task. City staff must consider many issues in formulating recommendations,
and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.
City staff assumes the responsibility to develop specific fee level recommendations to present to the City
Council. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules to guide the City, since many of the considerations
are based on the unique characteristics of the City of Rosemead, and administrative and political discretion.
However, in setting the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the service
solely benefits one end user or the general community.
Subsidization
Recalling the definition of a user fee helps guide decisions regarding subsidization. The general standard is
that individuals (or groups) who receive a wholly private benefit should pay 100% of the full cost of the
services. In contrast, services that are simply public benefit should be funded entirely by the general fund's
tax dollars. Unfortunately, for the decision makers, many services fall into the range between these two
extremes.
Further complicating the decision, opponents of fees often assert that the activities subject to the fees
provide economic, cultural, "quality of life," or other community benefits that exceed the costs to the City.
It is recommended the City consider such factors during its deliberations regarding appropriate fee levels.
Of course, subsidization can be an effective public policy tool, since it can be used to reduce fees to
encourage certain activities (such as compliance inspections to ensure public safety) or allow some people
to be able to afford to receive services they otherwise could not at the full cost. In addition, subsidies can
-afWILLDAN 10 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,,.aV<.,
be an appropriate and justifiable action, such as to allow citizens to rightfully access services, without
burdensome costs.
Despite the intent, it is important for the City and public to understand that subsidies must be covered by
another revenue source, such as the General Fund. Therefore, the general taxpayer will potentially help to
fund private benefits, and/or other City services will not receive funds that are otherwise directed to cover
subsidies.
Impact on Demand (Elasticity)
Economic principles of elasticity suggest that increased costs for services (higher fees) will eventually curtail
the demand for the services; whereas lower fees may spark an incentive to utilize the services and
encourage certain actions. Either of these conditions may be a desirable effect to the City. However, the
level of the fees that would cause demand changes is largely unknown. The Cost of Service Study did not
attempt to evaluate the economic or behavioral impacts of higher or lower fees; nevertheless, the City
should consider the potential impacts of these issues when deciding on fee levels.
Summary
If the City's principal goal of this study were to maximize revenues from user fees, Willdan would
recommend setting user fees at 100% of the full cost identified in this study. However, we understand that
revenue enhancement is not the only goal of a cost of service study, and sometimes full -cost recovery is
not needed, desired, or appropriate. Other City and departmental goals, City Council priorities, policy
initiatives, past experience, implementation issues, and other internal and external factors may influence
staff recommendations and City Council decisions. In this case, the proper identification of additional
services (new or existing services) and creation of a consistent and comprehensive fee schedule was the
primary objective of this study. City staff has reviewed the full costs and identified the "recommended fee
levels" for consideration by City Council. The attached appendices exhibit these unit fees individually.
The preceding sections provide background for each department or division and the results of this study's
analysis of their fees. For the full list of each fee's analysis, refer to Appendix Cof this report.
-afWILLDAN 11 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,,.aV<.,
Finance
Finance administers and coordinates the fiscal related activities of the City, Successor Agency, and Housing
Development Corporation. This includes all aspects of accounting, investing, payroll, debt
management, capital asset accounting, preparation of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
(ACFR), and other required financial reports, budget preparation and administration, fund/program
analysis, and special projects.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Finance fees. The review also consisted of
an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The majority of fees are set according to statutes and regulations. There are no recommended changes to
the fee amounts as most fees are currently set by statue and one new fee, Credit Card Transaction Fee, is
added as detailed in Appendix C.
-afWILLDAN 12 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<ALSEAVa.
City Clerk
The City Clerk is the local official who supervises and coordinates City elections; Serves as the Filing Officer
for City appeals; Prepares and updates the City's Conflict of Interest Code, and Serves as the local Filing
Officer for the Fair Political Practices Commission; Receives and opens all sealed bids and formally releases
bid bonds; Receives, processes, and maintains claims, public record requests, and summonses; Directs the
retention and destruction of official records in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Analysis
The analysis of the Clerk services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we
determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff
and the pro -rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdanthen
compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the
current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most flat
rate fees are currently set below the full cost of providing the service. It is recommended that City set City
Clerks fees at or near 100% cost recovery. As a result, there would be:
An increase for 8 fees;
An decrease for 1 fee;
13 fees would remain as currently set, and;
the average estimated fee increase for City Clerk would be at around 10% as detailed in Appendix
C.
-afWILLDAN 13 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,,.aV<.,
Planning
The Planning and Economic Development Division is responsible for implementing the City's General Plan
and Zoning Code which regulates the type of land uses within the City. Planning helps guide the orderly
development of the community and ensures that new development is attractive and compatible with the
surroundings and consistent with the City's codes and policies. The Division reviews and processes
development entitlement applications for compliance with zoning and subdivision regulations as well as
conditional use permits. Planning staff provides technical and administrative support to the City Council
and Planning Commission. The Planning Division is also responsible for economic development activities
and promoting the City as a desirable place for business and development. Business license applications
and film permits are also processed through the Division.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with Planning. The review also
consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The analysis of Planning Services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we
determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff
and the pro -rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then
compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the
current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most flat
rate fees are currently set below the full cost of providing the service. It is recommended that the City
increase most Planning Division fees to improve cost recovery as detailed in Appendix C, with some fees
set to retain levels of subsidy. As a result, there would be:
• an increase to 48 fees;
6 fees would decrease;
18 fees would remain as currently set, and;
the average estimated fee increase would be around 2% for flat fee services.
-afWILLDAN 14 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,,.aV<.,
Engineering
The Engineering Division is responsible for the design, supervision and inspection of all street, highway,
sidewalk and bike path construction; all City surveying and mapping operations including maintenance of
the City's street and utility records; management of the storm water and sewers including the design,
operation and maintenance of sanitary sewers and storm sewer systems; the review of land use changes
for public works feasibility; the research and development services supporting the solid waste management
program; and the preparation of various studies relating to Public Works.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with Engineering. The review also
consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The analysis of Engineering Services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby
we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of
staff and the pro -rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan
then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether
the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that current
fee levels are subsidizing the cost for most services. It is recommended that the City increase most
Engineering Services fees to improve cost recovery as detailed in Appendix C, with some fees set to retain
levels of subsidy. As a result, there would be:
• an increase to 38 fees;
• 4 fees would decrease;
• 5 new fees would be added;
• 1 fee would change from variable to a flat fee;
• 10 fees would remain as currently set, and;
• the average estimated increase for current flat rate fees would be around 9%.
-afWILLDAN 15 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Parks and Recreation
The City of Rosemead Parks & Recreation Department manages a wide range of services to help enrich the
lives of those who reside in the community. The programs accommodate a variety of interests, ages,
cultures and abilities.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Parks and Recreation Services
Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee
schedule.
The analysis of most Parks and Recreation programs encompassed facility rentals and other recreation
services. The fee for use of government owned facilities and property can be set discretionally by the City
per Proposition 26 to reduce the cost to the public for the facilities, and because there is market availability
for facility use by the public. The cost of acquisition, maintenance, repair, and upgrade to the City and
subsequently the community is offset by rental or use fee revenue. As such these fees should be set using
the knowledge of activity use for the facilities, policy desires of the City, and market factors when desirable.
It is generally accepted that many Recreation programs provide a measure of public benefit to the residents
and City as a whole. In addition, cities generally want to ensure that their programs and services remain
affordable to the community at large, and that the programs remain competitive with surrounding
jurisdictions and private businesses. Therefore, full cost recovery is typically not the primary goal of fee
setting. The analysis did analyze the direct staff cost involvement on many listed services, and the analysis
found that all services are subsidized. Staff has suggested reasonable fee adjustments to the schedule, and
they are detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
• An increase for 32 fees;
• 63 fees would remain as currently set, and;
• the average estimated increase for current fees would be around 6% as detailed in Appendix C.
-afWILLDAN 16 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Public Transportation
To provide public transportation services to Rosemead residents; manage the City's public transit; program
coordinator; oversee funding sources for public transportation programs; conduct analyses and studies on
the City's public transit program; participate in regional and state agencies that affect public transit; and
effectively publicize the City's transit program to residents and business.
Analysis
No analysis was done to the Public Transportation services and fee levels remain unchanged as detail in
Appendix C.
-afWILLDAN 17 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Parking
The Parking Control provides parking compliance and enforcement for the City.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with Parking fees. The review also consisted of an
evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The services included in Parking are a mixture of citations and one administrative fee for impounded
vehicles. The fines are set to deter the listed activities, and the analysis of the user fee relied primarily upon
a standard unit cost build-up approach. It is recommended that the City increase the Impounded Vehicle
Admin Fee to 100% cost recovery as detailed in Appendix C. All citations are recommended to remain at
their current amounts.
-afWILLDAN 18 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,,.aV<.,
Animal Care and Control
Provide animal care, control, sheltering, and licensing services in the City. City staff will respond to all animal
related field service requests, including injured and deceased animal calls. Partner with private and non-
profit entities to provide veterinary care, sheltering, and adoption services for impounded animals, and low-
cost vaccination and neutering services to the public. Manage all required licensing of animals in the City.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with Animal Care and Control. The
review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The analysis of Animal Care and Control services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up
approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover
the direct cost of staff and the pro -rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central
Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if
charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis
found that current fee levels are subsidizing the cost of service. The suggested fee amounts are detailed in
Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
an increase to 5 fees;
7 fees would remain as currently set;
5 fees would be reinstated, and;
the average estimated increase for current fees would be around 12%.
-afWILLDAN 19 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<ALSEAVa.
Public Safety
The Public Safety Department provides an array of safety and security related services in the City of
Rosemead. Rosemead's Chief of Police (Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Lieutenant) manages all
public safety services including law enforcement services with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
and LA County Probation Department and fire services with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Public
Safety also partners with a number of community organizations to help residents address various issues.
The Department also provides animal control.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Public Safety Department. The
review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
There are three Live Scan services listed under this section with two set by federal agencies, and one City
Administrative Fee. The analysis of the Administrative Fee relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-
up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to
recover the direct cost of staff and the pro -rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City
Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to
determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested
service. It is recommended that the City set the Administrative Fee at 100% cost recovery as detailed in
Appendix C.
-afWILLDAN 20 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Film Permit
Film permits are required for film, video or still photography shoots within the City of Rosemead. The
Community Development Department issues the permit and coordinates any City services that may be
needed.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with Film Permit fees. The review also consisted of
an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The analysis of the Film Permit services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach,
whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct
cost of staff and the pro -rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services.
Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged,
whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. Most fees listed are
charged based on the fully burdened hourly rate of staff involved, and three had their reasonable full cost
calculated. The analysis found that the three current fees are currently subsiding the cost of service. It is
recommended that the City increase those three Film Permit fees to improve cost recovery as detailed in
Appendix C, with some specific fees set to retain subsidies. As a result, there would be:
• The actual cost of staff fees would remain at full cost recovery, and;
• the three flat fees would be increased by 25% as detailed in Appendix C.
-afWILLDAN 21 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
Civil Fines
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 918, which authorized the issuance of Administrative Citations that impose civil
fines upon those who violate the Rosemead Municipal Code; and pursuant to Section 1.20.040 of the
Rosemead Municipal Code which provides that fines, interest and penalties shall be set by City Council
resolution, Resolution No. 2011-45 established the fines, interest and penalties for municipal code
violations as follows.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with Civil Fines fees. The review also consisted of an
evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The services included in Civil Fines are a mixture of citations and a user fee. The fines are set to deter the
listed activities, and the analysis of the Administrative Fee relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-
up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of the fee occurrence using staff time to recover
the direct cost of staff and the pro -rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central
Services. It is recommended that the City set the Administrative Fee at near 100% cost recovery as detailed
in Appendix C. All citations are recommended to remain at their current amounts.
-afWILLDAN 22 Comprehensive User Fee Study
�I F ..<.,..aVa.
RO 40i
Appendix A — Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered
Below are the total allowable costs thatmay be recovered through User Fees, however, only a percentage
of the total cost is realized as staff doesn't just work on services related to User Fees, but also work on an
array of other Dry functions during the operational hours of the CN The amounts listed below will not
recent
Ile to oN budgets as costs that should not be Included In overhead for personnel In the apple cab on
of determining fully burdened hourly rates were excluded. Examples of these casts are capital, debt,
monetary transfers, passthrough contract costs, and any other costs thans charged directly to the service
requestor.
City of Rosemead - User Fee
Overhead Rete Calculations
101: City Administration
101: City Clerk
101: commumW Development
101: Finance
101: Parks & Reareation
101: Bashi
101: Public Works
101: Public Works Admin
Department obeli Indirect
Total Salaries Operations& Overhead Allocation
&Benefits Administration % %
yWIl1DAN 23 Comprehensive User Fee Study
yWIl1DAN 23 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix B — Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Below are fully burdened hourly rates of staff positions that provide for the services detailed in Appendix
C. The FBHRs were used to determine the full cost of each service. They include the salary and benefit costs
for each position as well as all applicable overhead amounts for each position. For positions in central
service departments, such as the City Clerk and Finance, what is shown is the salary and benefit rate only,
as the overhead of central service departments is recovered through the cost allocation plan. When a
central service department position works on a fee or project in the purview of an operating department,
the overhead rates of the operating department (shown in Appendix A) will be applied to that central
service positions' salary and benefit rate for full cost recovery. For any user fee service request that is
outside the scope of the fees detailed in Appendix C, or for services for which there is no fee currently set,
the City can charge up to the full cost of the FBHR for personnel involved.
JtWILLDAN 24 Comprehensive User Fee Study
wx..cuL SEAVICes
City of Rosemead - User Fee
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation Kiwi OAP
Fully
TotalSall Burdsenl
Department Position Benefits Direct% IMirect% Hourly Bate
101:
City naministmtmn
Abmin- ADMINISTRATIVEASSISTANT
101s
City naministatiion
Arend ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
ioi_
City Pdmimstrawn
Adri CITYMANAGER
ioi_
City namimseatmn
Abmm- EXEC SALE TO CITY MANAGER
ioi_
City aeministatiion
Abmm- MANAGEMENT ANALYST
ioi_
City aeministatipn
Abmm-SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
101
Community Derelopment
co-ADMINISTRATIVEASSISTANT
101.
Community orvslppment
coASSISTANT FULANNER
-
101_
Community orvslppment
coASSOCIATE FULANNER
-
101_
Community orvolppment
co-COMMUNIEDDEVELOPMENTMIRECTOR
101.
Community Derelppment
ty 24
co-vurvN1 rvp60.
101c
Cry Clerk
duk-DTYCLEURK
101
City
YCI
DEPUTY U
1o1:
Finance
Ensure ACCOUNTANT
�nana-
101:Finance
$In.01
inznae FINANCE DIRECTOR
101:
Finance
inznce FINANCE MANAGER
101:
Finance
inznce SR ACCOUNTING SPECIALTST
101:
Finance
inznce SR ACCOUNTING
ioi_
Parka a CentralPEM-
ADMINUTRATIVESPrCwnsr
ioi_
Parks a Recreation
Perla- PARIS AND a[wEnnory DI0.mo0.
ioi_
Parks a Recreation
Perla-PRDSCemuvex[0.
ioi_
Parks a Recreation
Perla- 0.[c0.Fnnory COORDINAro0.
ioi_
Parks a Recreation
Perla- 0.[c0.Fnnory SUPERVISOR
ioi_
Parks s Recreation
Perla-SENIOR RECREATION LEADER
ioi_
Public Safety
PSADMINISTRATIVE
$113.93
zu,999.n
PS-CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
101_
Public Safety
PSPUBLIC SAFETY MANAGER
-
101:PublicSafrty
3a%
-
PSPUBLIC SAFETY SUPERMSECAR
101:PublicSafety
3a%
PSSo CODE ENFORCEMENTOFFICEIR
-
101:PublicWorks
tudlex a
As ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALTST
101:
Public Works
Are FACILITTIESTECHNICIAN
101:
Public Works
RAW MAINTENANCE LEAD WORKER
101:
Public Works
Are MAINTENANCE WORKER
101
Public Works
As -PUBLIC WORKS FISCAL A PROTECT WGIR
101:
Public Works
FAV
CADMIiNITRAn[ASSISTANT
101:
Public Works Marc
Reforms,
101:
Public Works Marc
PwoVms, PUDuc WORus DIRECTOR
91Fi/5.81
]%
B%
$59.2)
311,101.41
]96
D%
ssibi 3
324 1.00
M
036
$21
1.34di
M
036
$41.17
109,®.66
1%
0%
$10.92
146,131.51
1%
036
$9124
9fi,252.13
18%
23%
$81.81
1udsol
18%
23%
$99.n
134p581.H
18%
n%
$118.59
z61a39.B]
M
n%
$235.45
2110$11.95
18%
23%
$In.01
211$91.96
40%
036
$181.39
111,491
40%
036
$110.59
11i
48%
036
$96dau
292.33524
48%
D%
$Z4S.82
Cri
48%
036
$155.®
11O.290eau
48%
036
$92.M
n1.o19.45
48%
036
$103.17
lostas0.n
3a%
3a%
$113.93
zu,999.n
3a%
3a%
$2n.n
Inirl
3a%
3a%
$61.10
312,360.82
3a%
3a%
$111.92
tudlex a
30%
3a%
$130.90
55332.15
30%
3a%
%0.01
116An1.35
81%
111%
$139.86
310.n21,18
81%
111%
$116.15
In,105.m
81%
111%
ssibel
1aCadda91
81%
111%
$185.17
281,918.33
81%
111%
$171
124,086.24
8246
33%
$1N.55
Intada .38
8246
33%
$166.17
620.124.82
8096
33%
$180.24
910.462.51
8096
33%
$146.38
145.44.24
80%
Mat
$210.76
175,091
8036
Mat
$M3.M
90.311.05
19%
036
561
dull 76
19%
I 036
I $189.53
Wfl1DPN 25 Comprehensive User Fee
Appendix C — Cost Recovery Analysis
The following tables provide the results of the analysis, resulting full cost recovery amount, and
recommended fees. For fees, services, and penalties in which the full cost, existing fee and suggested fee
is listed as "NA", the amount or percentage was not calculable based on cost data or variable fee structure.
This is most common when either the current or the suggested fee includes a variable component that is
not comparable on a one-to-one basis, a full cost was not calculated (for penalties, fines, market-based
fees, or items not included in the study), or when there is not a current fee amount to compare against.
All services and fees analyzes as part of this study fall under one or multiple categories one through five of
the exemptions defined in Proposition 26. As such a cost analysis was performed to calculate the estimated
reasonable full cost of each service, and suggested fees are recommended at or below those amounts.
Estimated reasonable full costs were calculated based on City expenditures and time estimates.
To provide a thorough list of all fees and services, the schedules also includes items that were not part of
the scope of this study. Examples of such items are utility rates, taxes, in -lieu fees, and developer impact
fees.
ffWILLDAN 26 Comprehensive User Fee Study
wx..cuL SEAVICes
City of Rosemead
27
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost Suggested Fee
Fee 4
NA $25.00
$0.00
NA $35.00
$0.00
NA 3%
NA
Comprehensive User Fee Study
p
Current
Description Fee/Charge Unit Notes
1
Subpoenas - Documents(Government Code Section 68096.1)
15.00
NA
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
2
Subpoenas - Personal Appearance (Govt Code Section 68096.1)
275.00
$0
$19.48
3
Actual attendance (per person/per day)
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
1$10.00
$5
4
Mileage traveled (both ways/per mile)
Legal Rate
NA
1.00
5
Certification of Copies
5.00
$0
NA
6
Proof of Life Certification
5.00
$5.00
7
Photocopies of documents - per page
0.20
$30.73
$30.00
8
Photocopies of documents largerthan 8 % x 11 (per page)
1.00
$10
$24.80
9
Photocopies of FPPC documents (Govt Code Section 81008)
0.10
$36.00
$11
10
Copies of electronic records that have to be constructed,
programmed & computer services necessary to produce a copy of the
record (Govt. Code Section 6253.9(2)(a -g)
Actual Cost
$14.75
$14.00
11
Search and Retrieval fee for FPPC documents five years or older
(Govt. Code Section 81008)
5.00
$0
$43.40
12
Notary Fee per signature
15.00
By Resolution
$0
13
Plans and Specifications - walk-in
25.00
each
Fee set by U.S.
Department of
State
14
Plans and Specifications - mailed
40.00
each
15
Ownership Notification List
35.00
each
16
General Plan
25.00
17
General Plan Map
5.00
18
Zoning Map
5.00
19
Zoning Requirements
No charge
20
Zoning Ordinance
35.00
each
21
Candidate Statement Deposit
By Resolution
22
23
Passport Fees
Passport Execution Fee
Fee set by U.S.
Department of
State
24
Passport Photo
15.00
NA
W Fee 4
$15.00 $0
NA
$275.00
$0
NA
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
$0
NA
Legal Rate
$0
$19.48
$10.00
$5
$30.73
1$10.00
$5
NA
$0.20
$0
NA
1.00
$0
NA
$0.10
$0
NA
Actual Cost
$0
NA
$5.00
NA
$15.00
$0
$30.73
$30.00
$5
$66.10
$50.00
$10
$24.80
$24.00
-$11
$36.59
$36.00
$11
$14.75
$14.00
$9
$14.75
$14.00
Isq
NA
No charge
$0
$43.40
$43.00
$8
NA
By Resolution
$0
NA
Fee set by U.S.
Department of
State
$0.00
$15.74
$15.00
$0.00
City of Rosemead 28 Comprehensive User Fee Study
# Description
Current Fee/Charge
Unit
st
Suggested Fee
1 General Plan Amendment
2,000.00
$2,207.00
plus $50 each
additional parcel
2 Conditional Use Permit
1,320.00
$147
28759%
3 Lot Line Adjustment
225.00
NA
Cost + 10%
4 Landscape Review
Cost +10%
$1,439.00
$54
5 Tentative Parcel Map
1,385.00
$52
plus $100/lot
6 Tentative Tract Map
1,385.00
$1,437.05
plus$100/lot
7 Single Family Residential Variance
975.00
$2,125.00
$425
8 Other Variances
1,375.00
$145
$1,144.59
9 Zone Changes
1,700.00
$1,555.64
plus $50 each
additional parcel
10 Municipal Code Amendment
2,750.00
$946.00
$146
11 Design Review: Single Family Home
800.00
$146
$1,555.64
12 Design Review: Multi Family (3 or More Units)
1,000.00
$2,207.01
$1,925.00
13 Design Review: Sign Design Review
800.00
$1,063.00
$163
14 Design Review: Master Sign Program
800.00
$200
$263.89
15 Design Review: New Nonresidential Structures
1,540.00
$1,141.46
$1,000.00
16 Design Review: Residential Commercial Mixed -Use
1,540.00
$1,500.00
$300
17 Design Review: Remodel with Additions to Nonresidential
Structures
900.00
$0
$2,188.22
18 Design Review: Facade or Site Improvement for
Nonresidential Projects Only
800.00
19 Review of Conditional Use Permit (Maximum 2 site
inspections)
225.00
1$875.00
$175
20 Modification of Entitlements (Discretionary)
800.00
21 Planned Development Review
1,200.00
22 Covenants/Agreements
Cost + 10%
23 Relocation Impact Report (mobile home parks)
11,500.00
24 Plecific Plan Review (In-house)
25 1 Non-residential or Mixed Use
1700.00 1per review
City of Rosemead 29 Comprehensive User Fee Study
st
Suggested Fee
Fee D
$2,207.01
$2,207.00
$207
$11,11,467.14
$1,467.00
$147
28759%
$281.00
$56
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
$1,439.42
$1,439.00
$54
$1,437.05
$1,437.00
$52
$1,318.46
$1,218.00
$243
$1,437.05
$1,437.00
$62
$2,207.01
$2,125.00
$425
$2,895.89
$2,895.00
$145
$1,144.59
$1,000.00
$200
$1,555.64
$1,250.00
$250
$946.15
$946.00
$146
$946.15
$946.00
$146
$1,555.64
$1,555.00
$15
$2,207.01
$1,925.00
$385
$1,063.98
$1,063.00
$163
$1,063.98
$1,000.00
$200
$263.89
$263.00
$38
$1,141.46
$1,000.00
$200
$1,969.83
$1,500.00
$300
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
$2,188.22
1$1,875.00
$375
$1,065.55
1$875.00
$175
City of Rosemead 29 Comprehensive User Fee Study
q Description
Suggested Fee
Fee A
Residential - 2 or less units (maximum 3 revier!7
$281.00
per26
dwellingunit27
$769.96
$769.00
Residential -3 or more units
NA
per review28
$0
NA
Specific Plan Review (Outsource)
$1,005.61
$1,005.00
29
Specific Plan Amendment
Cost + 10%
$0
$887.78
30
Other Public Hearing Requests (modifications)
980.00
$373.00
$73
31
Other (LA County Clerk recording fee, subject to LA County fee
schedule)
Fee subject to LA
Count Fee
y
Schedule
NA
$500.00
32
Pre -Application (optional)
500.00
-$4,095
one review per
project
33
With Workshop Noticing
300.00
$281.00
one workshop per
project
34
Entitlement Plan Check Modification Fee (Ministerial)
600.00
$286.94
$281.00
35
Publication Fee
500.00
$72
$99.22
36
Expediting Fee
6,500.00
$31.00
$6
37
Entitlement Extensions
300.00
each
$257.00
38
Residential Site Plan Review (maximum 3 reviews)
225.00
per
dwelling
unit
$553.98
39
Residential Tenant/Site Improvement/No New Sq. Ft.
70.00
I Cost + 10%
$0
40
Non-residential Tenant/Site Improvement/No New Sq. Ft.
225.00
41
Non-residential Site Plan Review (maximum 3 reviews)
700.00
42
Lot Coverage Review (i.e. landscape and hardscape)
25.00
43
Mechanical Elements Review
25.00
44
Fence Plan Review
25.00
45
Sign Plan Review
225.00
46
lWater Efficient Landscape Review
1225.00
47
JOak Tree Permit
1800.00
48
INegative Declaration Fee (Not including County charges)
I Cost + 10%
City of Rosemead 30 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Fee A
$573.88
$281.00
$56
$769.96
$769.00
$69
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
$1,005.61
$1,005.00
$25
NA
Fee subject to
LA County Fee
Schedule
$0
$887.78
$625.00
$125
$373.03
$373.00
$73
$603.97
$603.00
$3
NA
$500.00
$0
$2,405.45
$2,405.00
-$4,095
$816.54
$375.00
$75
$584.60
$281.00
$56
$99.22
$87.00
$17
$286.94
$281.00
$56
$772.32
$772.00
$72
$99.22
$31.00
$6
$49.61
$31.00
$6
$49.61
$31.00
$6
$257.73
$257.00
$32
$237.18
J$237.00
$12
$553.98
J$553.00
11-$247
NA
I Cost + 10%
$0
City of Rosemead 30 Comprehensive User Fee Study
#
Description I
Cu!rrent,Fee/Charge Unit
Notes
49
Mitigated Negative Declaration (Not including County
charges)50
C0%
Cost + 10%
$0
CategoricalExemption Fee
951
-$14
NA
EIR Plus Outside Consultant (Not including County charges)
C0%
NA
52
Mitigation Monitoring
C0%
Cost + 10%
53
Other Environmental Reviews/Documents
Cost +10%
$82
54
Administrative Determination
450.00
NA
55
Administrative Use Permit
500.00
Cost + 10%
56
Density Bonus (i.e. application, document review, etc.)
Cost + 10%
$0
57
Development Agreement
Cost + 10%
NA
58
Joint/Off-Site Parking Agreement
Cost + 10%
$31.00
59
Minor Exception
300.00
$0
60
Reasonable Accommodation
No fee
61
Site Inspection
25.00
$75.00
62
Geologic/Geotechnical Review
Cost +10%
$56
63
Traffic Review
Cost + 10%
$24.80
64
Zoning Verification L
$59.30
$59.00
65
Residential
60.00
$6
$384.60
66
Nonresidential
225.00
First yard sale
of each 12-
month period
is free
$0
67
Accessory Dwelling Unit Covenant
100.00
$769.19
1$769.00
68
Banner Permit
60.00
$19
69
Outdoor Sales (Nonresidential)
70.00
70
Private Bus Application Review
25.00
71
Temporary Use Permit
225.00
72
Yard Sale Permit (Two yard sales are allowed per residence
every six months. There is no charge for the first yard sale of
each 12 -month period.)
First yard sale of
each 12 -month
period is free
$5 each additional
Yard sale
73
jAppeals
74
1 Filing Fees (Planning Commission)
1650.00
75
1 Filing Fees (City Council)
1750.00
City of Rosemead 31 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Fee A
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
$77.00
$76.00
-$14
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
$532.78
$532.00
$82
$1,251.70
$625.00
$125
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
$928.87
$375.00
$75
NA
No fee
$0
$49.61
$31.00
$6
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
NA
Cost + 10%
$0
$242.69
$75.00
$15
$281.43
$281.00
$56
$99.22
$99.00
-$1
$24.80
$24.00
-$36
$59.30
$59.00
-$11
$49.61
$31.00
$6
$384.60
$281.00
$56
$8.48
First yard sale
of each 12-
month period
is free
$0
$769.19
1$769.00
$119
$769.19
1$769.00
$19
City of Rosemead 31 Comprehensive User Fee Study
401rCurrent
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Fee/Charge Unit Notes
Tentative Tract Map (Establishing engineering and public
2
450.00
$4,986.01
improvement conditions)
3
Record Map Analysis:
5,500.00
$28
plus$150/lot
4
1. Monument review
550.00
$375.00
$75
$950.70
2. Verification that map is consistent with conditions to tentative
$100
5
$372.34
550.00
$72
approval
$2,672.56
$2,500.00
$500
$192.79
3. Map clearance and review of agreement and/or improvement
$37
$578.36
1$578.00
6
$578.36
300.00
$87
$1,901.41
$937.00
securities
NA
Same as initial
plan checking
$0
7
4. Fourth and each subsequent check submittal
850.00
NA
$500.00
8
Deferred Monume
Actual Cost
$0
9
Monument Review
300.00
$418.88
10
Certificate of Compliance (Lot Line Adjustment)
$418.88
$375.00
11
Record document analysis, clearance, and processing
2,000.00
$75
12
Plus parcel and:
150.00
$119.66
13
1. Verification of compliance with conditions of approval
500.00
14
2. Review of agreements and/or improvement securities
350.00
15
WChecking
plus 2 % percent of the first $50,000 plus 2
percent of the next $100,000 plus 1
16
1. Initial
750.00
percent thereafter of the estimated
construction cost
Same as initial
17
2. Revision Actual cost
plan checking
18
Mtruction Permits
19
1. Issuance Fee
100.00
plus 6 percent of first $100,000 plus 5
percent of next $100,000 plus 4 percent
20
2. Initial Observation
500.00
thereafter of the estimated construction
,cost
Actual cost (an initial deposit is required)
21
3. Modifications Observation
Actual Cost
for all modifications requiring plan revisions
or as built
22
Construction Permits in Right of Way
23
1. Driveway
300.00 driveway
24
2. Close existing driveway opening
300.00 driveway
25
3. Individual sidewalk
300.00 location
26
4. Individual curb and gutter
300.00 location
27
5. Individual alley improvement
3.00 sq.ft/location
City of Rosemead 32 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Fee A
$1,721.85
$562.00
$112
$4,986.01
$4,986.00
-$514
$578.36
$578.00
$28
$578.36
$578.00
$28
$385.57
$375.00
$75
$950.70
$950.00
$100
$372.34
$372.00
$72
$2,672.56
$2,500.00
$500
$192.79
$187.00
$37
$578.36
1$578.00
$78
$578.36
$437.00
$87
$1,901.41
$937.00
$187
NA
Same as initial
plan checking
$0
$372.34
$125.00
$25
NA
$500.00
$0
NA
Actual Cost
$0
$418.88
$375.00
$75
$418.88
$375.00
$75
$418.88
$375.00
$75
$418.88
$375.00
$75
$119.66
$3.00
$0
City of Rosemead 32 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Rosemead 33 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Current
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
u
Descri
ee/Charge
Unit
Notes
$187.00
$37
$418.88
location for firstplus
$75
28
6. Street trees
100.00
$50/tree thereafter
$299.22
1$21.00
tree
$418.88
29
7. Curb drain (curb only)
150.00
drain
30
8. Parkway drain
300.00
drain
$478.00
31
9. Relocate existing drainage structure
1,000.00
Istructure
$299.22
32
Excavation Permits
33
1. Service cut
17.50cut
$299.22
and$2/sq.ft of excavation
34
2. Sewer cut
250.00
connection to mai
plus Service Cut Charges
35
Encroachment Permits
$1,721.85
$562.00
$112
36
1. Stockpile material or waste in street right -of way or easement
350.00
stockpile
$150 refundable
$120
2. Placing containerfor material or waste in a street right-of-way
$578.00
$78
$578.36
37
$78
475.00
container
$325 refundable
$1,156.72
or easement
$212
3. Placing temporary structure or parking equipment in street
Cost +10%
structure or piece
NA
38
$0
200.00
Cost +10%
$0
NA
right-of-way or easement
$0
of equipment
4. Pedestrian protection required by building code (Construction
39
200.00
location
at parkway grade)
40
15. Streetclosures
41
Streetclosures
400.00
day/location
42
Lane closures
200.00
lane/day
plus$800/night Saturday, Sunday or
43
6. Commercial filming400.00
working day
holiday
issuance fee plus
44
7. Other Encroachments (deposit required)
50.00
actual cost
45
IWI Map
Tentative Parcel Map (establish engineering and public
46
450.00
improvement conditions)
47
Record Map Analysis
3,400.00
plus$150/parcel and
48
1. Dedications
2,000.00
49
2. Monument review
500.00
3. Verification that map is consistent with conditions of tentative
50
500.00
approval
4. Map clearance and review agreements and/or improvements
51
300.00
securities
52
5. Fourth and each subsequent check submittal
850.00
53
10ther Engineering Services
54Easement/va
cat ion deed research & review
Cost+ 10%
55
Covena nt agreement research & review
Cost +10
56
1 Lega l description/offer of ded ication resea rch&review
Cost +10
57
jPreparation of legal description/dedication documents
Cost +10
City of Rosemead 33 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Fee A
$418.88
$125.00
$25
$418.88
$187.00
$37
$418.88
$375.00
$75
$1,376.17
$1,250.00
$250
$299.22
1$21.00
$4
$418.88
1$312.00
$62
$418.88
$418.00
$68
$478.77
$478.00
$3
$299.22
$250.00
$50
$299.22
$250.00
$50
$418.88
$418.00
$18
$299.22
$250.00
$50
$658.20
$500.00
$100
$209.44
$62.00
$12
$1,721.85
$562.00
$112
$3,855.75
$3,855.00
$455
$2,120.66
$2,120.00
$120
$578.36
$578.00
$78
$578.36
$578.00
$78
$385.57
$375.00
$75
$1,156.72
$1,062.00
$212
NA
Cost +10%
$0
NA
Cost +10%
$0
NA
Cost +10%
$0
NA
Cost +10%
$0
City of Rosemead 33 Comprehensive User Fee Study
u
Description
Current
ee/Charge Unit
Notes
58
Plan copies— largerthan 24"x36"
5.00 page
59
Standard Hourly Review Charge
150.00
60
Standard Hourly Inspection Charge
125.00
61
Tree Planting In-lieu Fee: Residential
750.00
62
Tree Planting In-lieu Fee: Commercial
1,000.00
63
NPDES Fee
Cost+ 10%
plus ongoing inspection costs
64
1 Hou rly Inspection- After Hou rs
New
65Expedited
Plan Check Review
New
66
Expedited Hourly Permit Review
New
67
IFernnit Re-Issuance Fee
New
68
ITraffic Control Plan Review
Cost+ 10%
1 plus ongoing inspection costs
City of Rosemead 34 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Rosemead 35 Comprehensive User Fee Study
705$$
k
Description
Resident Current
Fee/Charge
Non -Resident
Current
Fee/Charge
Unit Notes
11
Administrative Fee (Patron initiated refunds)
5.00
5.00
2
Pool Admission
1.00
$1.00
$0
3
Daily recreation swim (17 and under)
1.00
1.00
$25.05
4
Daily recreation swim (18 and over)
2.00
2.00
$35.00
5
Season recreation swim (17 and under)
25.00
NA
NA
6
ISeason recreation swim (18 and over)
35.00
INA
7
Family pass
75.00
NA
NA
8
Lap Swim (Rosemead Pool):
$0
9
Per Visit
3.00
5.00
$50.00
10
20 Visit
40.00
65.00
$5
11
Lessons:
$35.00
$5
$40.04
12
Group Swim Lesson -Youth (Rosemead)
30.00
45.00
$100.00
13
Group Swim Lesson -Adult (Rosemead)
35.00
50.00
$100.00
14
Group Swim Lesson -Youth (Garvey)
30.00
30.00
$0
15
Group Swim Lesson -Adult (Garvey)
35.00
35.00
$39.25
16
Private Lessons (one instructor one student)
(Rosemead)
100.00
130.00
$45.00
17
Private Lessons (one instructor one student) (Garvey)
100.00
100.00
$55.00
18
Semi -Private Lessons (one in stru cto r two or th ree
students) (Rosemead)
80.00
100.00
each
19
Semi -Private Lessons (one instructortwo orthree
students) (Garvey)
80.00
80.00
each
20
Aqua Aerobics (Rosemead)
40.00
65.00
1$95.00
21
Aqua Aerobics (Garvey)
45.00
45.00
$110.00
22
Mermaid Class
40.00
55.00
$20
23
24
Programs:
Sr. Nutrition
1.25
3.25
$125.26
25
Club Participant
1.25
NA
26
27
Camp Rosemead:
Summer -1st Child
85.00
105.00
perwee k
28
Summer -2nd Child
75.00
95.00
perweek
29
Fall/Winter/Spring-1st Child
70.00
90.00
perweek
30
Fall/Winter/Spring-2nd Child
60.00
80.00
perweek
31
Senior Dances
5.00
5.00
32
Sweetheart Jamboree
15.00
20.00
33
Classes:
34
Preschool classes- four days per week
1380.00
420.00
qtr 10 weeks
35
Instructional Classes
I Fee set by inst.
Fee set by inst.
City of Rosemead 35 Comprehensive User Fee Study
705$$
Resident
Suggested Fee
Non -Resident
Suggested Fee
Fee A
$5.00
$5.00
$0
1.00
$1.00
$0
2.00
$2.00
$0
$25.05
$25.00
NA
$0
NA
$35.00
NA
$0
NA
$75.00
NA
$0
$31.35
$3.00
$5.00
$0
NA
$40.00
$65.00
$0
$40.04
$35.00
$50.00
$5
$40.04
$40.00
$55.00
$5
$40.04
$35.00
$35.00
$5
$40.04
$40.00
$40.00
$5
NA
$100.00
$130.00
$0
NA
$100.00
$100.00
$0
NA
$80.00
$100.00
$0
NA
$80.00
$80.00
$0
$39.25
$40.00
$65.00
$0
NA
$45.00
$45.00
$0
$39.25
$40.00
$55.00
$0
NA
$1.25
$3.25
$0
NA
$1.25
NA
$0
$155.95
$105.00
$125.00
$20
$155.95
1$95.00
$115.00
$20
$155.95
$90.00
$110.00
$20
$155.95
$80.00
$100.00
$20
$25.05
$5.00
$5.00
$0
$125.26
$15.00
$20.00
$0
NA
$380.00
$420.00
$0
NA
Fee set by inst.
Fee set by inst.
$0
City of Rosemead 35 Comprehensive User Fee Study
L
k
36
Description
Youth Sports (3-14 year olds):
Resident Current
Fee/Charge
Non -Resident
Current
Fee/Charge
Full Cost
37
Early Registration
35.00
45.00
season
38
Registration
40.00
60.00
season
39
Late Registration
45.00
65.00
season
40
Facility Use
$55.00
$5
41
42
Auditoriums:JL
Ga rvey Center - Banq uet Room
75.00
in
130.00
hr
43
Ga rvey Center -FGT Room
50.00
100.00
hr
44
Security Deposit
300.00
500.00
hr
45
Rosemead/Garvey Kitchen
25.00
50.00
hr
46
Meeting Rooms:
$10
$10
$114.24
$35.00
47
Rosemead Center -Rooms
25.00
60.00
hr
48
Garvey Center -Rooms 103 & 104 (50)
25.00
60.00
hr
49
Garvey Center -Room 103 (100)
40.00
100.00
hr
50
Garvey Center -Rooms 108&109(50)
25.00
60.00
hr
51
Garvey Center -Room 108 (100)
40.00
100.00
hr
52
Rosemead Center -Room 1
50.00
100.00
hr
53
Rosemead Center -Room 2
65.00
130.00
hr
54
Rosemead Center - Room 3 or
25.00
60.00
hr
55
Security Deposit
100.00
150.00
$125.00
56
Community Center use during non -business hours (for
otherwise exempt Government agencies, Rosemead -
recognized non -profits, and community
Organizations): Where it costs the City to staff
facilities for such use, the Fully burdened hourly staff
rate will be passed on to the facility user.
all
$150.00
E
57
Dinsmoor Gardens - 6 Hr. Rental
350.00
700.00
NA
58
Dinsmoor Kitchenette Usage (In conjunction with 6 Hr.
Rental)
75.00
100.00
J$235.00
59
Security Deposit
300.00
500.00
$300.00
60
Special Event Insurance (Facility Use):
61
Hazard Class l: IV
62
1-100
100.00
125.00
63
101-500
130.00
150.00
64
1 501-1500
200.00
225.00
65
66
Hazard Class II:
1 1-100
1140.00
1160.00
67
1 101-500
1235.00
1260.00
68
1 501-1500
1280.00
1300.00
City of Rosemead 36 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
Resident
Suggested Fee
Non -Resident
Suggested Fee
Fee A
$381.42
$40.00
$45.00
$5
$381.42
$45.00
$50.00
$5
$381.42
1$50.00
$55.00
$5
$114.24
$85.00
$140.00
$10
$114.24
$60.00
$110.00
$10
NA
$300.00
$500.00
$0
NA
$151.19
$35.00
$35.00
$60.00
$70.00
$10
$10
$114.24
$35.00
$70.00
$10
$114.24
$50.00
$110.00
$10
$114.24
$35.00
$70.00
$10
$114.24
$50.00
$110.00
$10
$151.19
$60.00
$110.00
$10
$151.19
$75.00
$140.00
$10
$151.19
$35.00
$70.00
$10
NA
NA
$100.00
$350.00
$150.00
$700.00
$0
$0
NA
$75.00
$100.00
$0
NA
$300.00
$500.00
$0
NA
$100.00
$125.00
$0
NA
$130.00
$150.00
$0
NA
J$200.00
J$225.00
$0
NA
J$140.00
$160.00
$0
NA
J$235.00
$260.00
$0
NA
J$280.00
$300.00
ISO
City of Rosemead 36 Comprehensive User Fee Study
r 7
69
cription
1 Facility Use:
Resident Current
Fee/Charge
Non -Resident
Current
Fee/Charge
Notes
70
RAC Lane Fee (3 Lane Minimum)
15.00
15.00
Lane
71
RAC (Pool and Deck Area Only)
75.00
150.00
hr
72
Covered Picnic Area (% canopy -During swim hours)
25.00
50.00
hr
73
Lawn Area (Picnic) (During swim hours)
25.00
50.00
hr
74
RAC (Exclusive Use)
175.00
350.00
hr
75
Splash Zone (Exclusive Use)
140.00
140.00
hr
76
Sm. Shade Shelter (During swim hours)
25.00
25.00
hr
77
Lg. Shade Shelter (During swim hours)
35.00
35.00
hr
78
RAC Lights
25.00
50.00
hr
79
BBQ Rental (RAC)
15.00
20.00
hr
80
68Q Rental (Splash)
15.00
15.00
hr
81
Pool Facility Deposits:
82
Shelter Deposit
50.00
150.00
83
Facility Deposit
300.00
500.00
NA
$90.50
84
Lifeguard/Aquatic Staff (Splash minimum 4-6 required
and RAC minimum 5-6 required)
16.00
16.00
hr
85
86
Special Event Insurance (Pool Facility Use)
Hazard Class III:
$60.00 $10
$90.50
$35.00
87
1-100
215.00
230.00
$90.50
88
101-500
360.00
375.00
$60.00 $10
89
501-1500
475.00
525.00
$60.00
90
Park Facility Use:
$35.00
NA $10
$90.50
91
Rosemead Park (perfield)
12.00
50.00
hr
92
Rosemead Park -Lights
25.00
60.00
hr
93
Garvey Park(perfield)
12.00
50.00
hr
94
Garvey Park- Lights(perfield)
25.00
60.00
hr
95
Sports Complex -Fields
12.00
50.00
hr
96
Sports Complex -Lights
25.00
60.00
hr
97
Garvey Park -Multi -Purpose Field
12.00
50.00
hr
98
Garvey Park -Multi -Purpose Field w/Lights
18.00
65.00
hr
99
Garvey Park -Gymnasium
50.00
115.00
hr
100
Garvey Park -Gymnasium (Rosemead Non -Profit Team
25.00
NA
101
Sm. Picnic Shelter Reservation (Day Use)
50.00
100.00
102
Lg. Picnic Shelter Reservation (Day Use)
75.00150.00
103
Zapopan Park Picnic Shelter (Day Use)
35.00
100.00
104
Park Facility Deposits:
105
Field Security Deposit
50.00
1100.00
City of Rosemead 37 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
Resident
Suggested Fee
Non -Resident
Suggested Fee Fee A
NA
$15.00
$15.00 $0
NA
$75.00
$150.00 $0
NA
$35.00
$60.00 $10
NA
$35.00
$60.00 $10
NA
1$175.00
$350.00 $0
NA
$140.00
$140.00 $0
NA
$40.00
$40.00 $15
NA
$50.00
$50.00 $15
NA
$25.00
$50.00 $0
NA
$30.00
$30.00 $15
NA
$30.00
$30.00 $15
$90.54
$50.00
$150.00 $0
NA
$300.00
$500.00 $0
$90.54
$20.00
$20.00 $4
IFE
NA
$215.00
$230.00 $0
NA
$360.00
$375.00 $0
NA
$90.50
$475.00
$22.00
$525.00 $0
$60.00 $10
$90.50
$35.00
$70.00 $10
$90.50
$22.00
$60.00 $10
$90.50
$35.00
$70.00 $10
$90.50
$22.00
$60.00 $10
$90.50
1$35.00
$70.00 $10
$90.50
1$22.00
$60.00 $10
$90.50
$28.00
$75.00 $10
$90.50
$60.00
$115.00 $10
$90.50
$35.00
NA $10
$90.50
$60.00
$100.00 $10
$90.50
$85.00
$150.00 $10
$90.50
$35.00
$90.00 $0
$65.45
$60.00
1$110.00 $10
City of Rosemead 37 Comprehensive User Fee Study
I
City of Rosemead 38 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Resident
Non -Resident
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Suggested Fee
Resident Current
Current
$100.00
NA
k
Description
Fee/Charge
Fee/Charge
Unit
Notes
Field Security Deposit (Rosemead Non -Profit Tea ms
75%ofa
75%ofa
106
100.00
NA
of City costs for
Only)
booth operation
booth operation
107
Staff
at cost
at cost
$0
108
Miscellaneous Fee:
fees and
fees and
75% of a
associated rental
costs
costs
proportional
Proportional share
Proportional share
NA
share of City
plus $50
$0
NA
Proportional share
Proportional share
costs for booth
plus $150
plus $150
Vendor Booths — Special Events: Rosemead non-profit
operation
$50.00
$0
NA
109
Event admission
$0
plus 10%
plus 25%
organizations
including Los
$150.00
$0
$112.92
$1.20
NA
Angeles County
NA
Cost plus 10%
Cost plus 10%
$0
fees and
associated
rental costs
Vendor Booths— Special Events: Other non-profit
Proportional
110
organizations
share plus $50
Proportional
111
Vendor Booths—Special Events: All other vendors
share plus $150
Deposit will be
forfeited for
vendors
112
Vendor Booths— Special Events: Deposit
50.00
cancelling
within 45 days
of event.
Event
Event
113
Excursions
admission plus
admission plus
10%
25%
114
Military Street Banners
150.00
150.00
115
Garden Plot
1.20
NA
persq.ft
116
Memorial Bench and Tree Fee
Cost plus 10%
Cost plus 10%
City of Rosemead 38 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Resident
Non -Resident
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Suggested Fee
Fee A
NA
$100.00
NA
$0
NA
at cost
at cost
$0
75%ofa
75%ofa
proportional share
proportional share
of City costs for
of City costs for
booth operation
booth operation
NA
including Los
including Los
$0
Angeles County
Angeles County
fees and
fees and
associated rental
associated rental
costs
costs
Proportional share
Proportional share
NA
plus $50
plus $50
$0
NA
Proportional share
Proportional share
$0
plus $150
plus $150
$56.46
$50.00
$50.00
$0
NA
Event admission
Event admission
$0
plus 10%
plus 25%
NA
$150.00
$150.00
$0
$112.92
$1.20
NA
$0
NA
Cost plus 10%
Cost plus 10%
$0
City of Rosemead 38 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Rosemead 39 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
N
Description
Current
Fee/Charge
Unit
Notes
1
Senior Bus Pass
9.00
mo
$0.50
2
Dial -A -Ride
0.50
ride
$0
3
Shopper Sh uttle
0.50
ride
City of Rosemead 39 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
Subsidy %
Suggested Fee
Fee A
NA
NA
$9.00
$0
NA
NA
$0.50
$0
NA
NA
$0.50
$0
City of Rosemead 39 Comprehensive User Fee Study
q
Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
CVC 4000 (a)
Registration required (if not corrected)
73.00
CVC 4152.5
Failure to apply for registration
38.00
CVC 4152.5
With Proof of correction
35.00
CVC 4454 (a)
Registration card
38.00
CVC 4454 (a)
With proof of correction
35.00
CVC 4457
Mutilated or illegal license plate
38.00
CVC 4457
With proof of correction
35.00
CVC 4462 (b)
Evidence of registration -wrong vehicle
38.00
CVC 5200
Display of license plate
38.00
CVC 5200
With proof of correction
35.00
CVC 5201
Position of license plate
38.00
CVC 5201
With proof of correction
35.00
CVC 5201 (f)
Plate clearly visible
38.00
CVC 5201(f)
With proof of correction
35.00
CVC 5202
Period of display
38.00
CVC 5202
With proof of correction
35.00
CVC 5204 (a)
No tabs
73.00
CVC 5204 (a)
With proof of correction
35.00
CVC 27155
Fuel cap required
38.00
CVC 21113(a)
Unlawful parking -public grounds
53.00
CVC 22500 (a)
Parking within intersection
53.00
CVC 22500 (b)
Parking on crosswalk
53.00
CVC 22500 (c)
Parking/safety & curb (marked with red paint)
55.00
CVC 22500 (d)
Parking within 15ft. From fire station entrance
68.00
CVC 22500 (e)
Parking in front of public/private driveway
53.00
CVC 22500 (f)
Parking on sidewalk
53.00
CVC 22500 (g)
Parking along excavation
53.00
CVC 22500 0)
Parking in tunnel
53.00
CVC 22500 (k)
Parking on bridge
53.00
CVC 22500 (1)
Parking- blocking wheelchair ramp
258.00
CVC 22500.1
Parking in fire lane (properly marked and posted)
78.00
CVC 22502 (e)
Curb parking one-way roadway
53.00
CVC 22507(a)
Illegal stopping, parking or standing of vehicles
500.00
Ful
uidy %
Suggested Fee
NA
NA
$73.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$73.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$35.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$55.00
$0
NA
NA
$65.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$255.00
$0
NA
NA
$75.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$500.00
$0
City of Rosemead 40 Comprehensive User Fee Study
#
Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
CVC 22507.8 (a)
Disabled -no visible placard or plate
338.00
CVC 22507.8 (b)
Parking -blocking handicapped space
338.00
CVC 22507.8 (c)
Parking in disabled crosshatched boundary lanes
338.00
CVC 22515
Unattended vehicle
53.00
CVC 22516
Locked door- no escape
48.00
CVC 22517
Open door into traffic lane (driver's side)
68.00
CVC 22521
Parking on railroad tracks
43.00
CVC 22522
Parking near sidewalk access ramp
288.00
CVC 2523(a)(b)
Abandonment prohibited
113.00
LAC 15.20.070
Failure to obey signs/curb markings (altered)
50.00
LAC 15.20.070
Failure to obey signs/curb markings (time limits)
63.00
LAC 15.20.130
Parking space markings
50.00
LAC 15.48.050
Vehicle exceeding posted weight limits
55.00
LAC 15.48.060
Vehicle exceeding 14,000 lbs. - posted
55.00
LAC 15.64.010
Stopping prohibited, parking time limits
50.00
LAC 15.64.020
Parking in loading zones (commercial)
78.00
LAC 15.64.030
Parking time limit -post office
48.00
LAC 15.64.040
Parking at mailbox
48.00
LAC 15.64.050
No commercial parking (more than 6,000 lbs.) 2:00 A.M.
78.00
LAC 15.64.052
No commercial parking (more than 10,000 lbs.) in
residential district at any time (5 exceptions)
78.00
LAC 15.64.055
Commercial vehicle (more than 6,000 lbs.) parked in viol 78.00
LAC 15.64.100
Parking, disconnected trailer
53.00
LAC 15.64.110
Parking in bus zone
263.00
LAC 15.64.120
Parking in passenger zone
53.00
LAC 15.64.130
No parking -alleys
53.00
LAC 15.64.140
Temporary no parking/street sweeping
53.00
LAC 15.64.210
Key in ignition/unaltered vehicle
53.00
LAC 15.64.220
Parking on grades
48.00
LAC 15.64.230
Parking more than 18 in. from curb
50.00
LAC 15.64.240
Angle parking
48.00
LAC 15.64.250
Double parking
53.00
LAC 15.64.260
No parking at any time
55.00
Ful
uidy 0
Suggested Fee
NA
NA
$335.00
$0
NA
NA
$335.00
$0
NA
NA
$335.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$45.00
$0
NA
NA
$65.00
$0
NA
NA
$43.00
Iso
NA
NA
$288.00
$0
NA
NA
$113.00
$0
NA
NA
$50.00
$0
NA
NA
$63.00
$0
NA
NA
$50.00
$0
NA
NA
$55.00
$0
NA
NA
$55.00
$0
NA
NA
$50.00
$0
NA
NA
$78.00
$0
NA
NA
$48.00
$0
NA
NA
$48.00
$0
NA
NA
$78.00
$0
NA
NA
$78.00
$0
NA
NA
$78.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$263.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$48.00
$0
NA
NA
$50.00
$0
NA
NA
$48.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$55.00
$0
City of Rosemead 41 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full CostIffiaked
NA
'on
Current
Fee/Charge Unit
LAC 15.64.270
Parking on private or public property without consent
53.00
LAC 15.64.271
Parking in front yard
40.00
LAC 15.64.280
Parking on wrong side of the street
53.00
LAC 15.64.290
Parking between curb and adjacent property
53.00
LAC 15.64.300
Blocking street
53.00
LAC 15.64.310
Parking of vehicle transporting hazardous materials
363.00
LAC 15.64.320
Blocking driveway on private street
53.00
LAC 15.64.330
Parking within intersection
53.00
LAC 15.64.350
Parking special hazard
53.00
LAC 15.64.360
Parking adjacent to school
53.00
LAC 15.64.370
Parking within 15ft. of fire hydrant
68.00
LAC 15.64.390
Parking in assigned parking space
53.00
LAC 15.64.400
Disabled parking on street
338.00
LAC 15.64.410
Disabled parking off street
338.00
LAC 15.76.080
Parking on sidewalk
53.00
LAC 15.76.120
Repairing vehicles on street
53.00
LAC 15.76.130
Washing vehicles on street
53.00
LAC 17.04.370
Parks - unauthorized parking
53.00
LAC 9.12.1410
Obstructing emergency access routes
68.00
NA
Overnight parking permit commercial
60.00
$0
Expired registration tabs
73.00
$53.00
DUI Cost Recovery
573.00
NA
Impounded vehicle admin. Fee
128.00
NA
Stored Vehicle admin. Fee
103.00
Full CostIffiaked
NA
NA
Fee
$53.00
Fee 0
$0
NA
NA
$40.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$363.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$68.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$338.00
$0
NA
NA
$338.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$53.00
$0
NA
NA
$68.00
$0
NA
NA
$60.00
$0
NA
NA
$73.00
$0
NA
NA
$573.00
$0
$150.00
0%
$150.00
$22
NA
NA
$103.00
$0
City of Rosemead 42 Comprehensive User Fee Study
q
Description
t
Notes
1
Dog Licensing:
$34.96
2
New/renewal for male or female 25.00
$34.96
$15.00
3
New/renewal for spayed or neutered with certificate 15.00
$5.00
$0.00
$1.00
$0.00
$51.79
New/renewal for spayed or neutered with certificate
$6.00
$51.79
4
7.00
Owned by senior citizen (60 yrs. and older)
$51.79
$0.00
5
Dead Animal Disposal:
$51.00
$1.00
$51.79
Picked up from owner by Animal Control - small(less
$0.00
Picked up from owner by Animal Control
6
0.00
NA
NA
$20.00
$50.00
$0.00
NA
than 30 pounds)
$50.00
with active license - Free
NA
Picked up from owner by Animal Control - small
NA
NA
7
25.00
without a dog license (less than 30 pounds)
NA
lCost+10%
S
Picked up from owner by Animal Control - cat 0.00
Picked up from owner by Animal Control - large (more
Picked up from owner by Animal Control
9
0.00
than 30 pounds)
with active license - Free
Picked up from owner by Animal Control - large
10
50.00
without a dog license (more than 30 pounds)
11
Delivered by Animal Control 0.00
12
Delivered to Animal Control by business 0.00
Dog license penalty fee if paid 30 days after expiration
13
20.00
date
14
Animal Relinquishment by owner:
15
Picked up by Animal Control - small 0.00
Fee was on a previous schedule
16
Picked up by Animal Control - litter 0.00
Fee was on a previous schedule
17
Picked up by Animal Control - small livestock 0.00
Fee was on a previous schedule
18
Picked up by Animal Control - single large animal0.00
Fee was on a previous schedule
19
Special handling by Animal Control Officer 0.00
Fee was on a previous schedule
City of Rosemead 43 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Fee 0
$34.96
$31.00
$6.00
$34.96
$15.00
$3.00
$34.96
$51.79
$5.00
$0.00
$1.00
$0.00
$51.79
$31.00
$6.00
$51.79
$0.00
$0.00
$51.79
$0.00
$0.00
$51.79
$51.00
$1.00
$51.79
$0.00
$0.00
$51.79
$0.00
$0.00
NA
NA
$20.00
$50.00
$0.00
NA
NA
$50.00
NA
NA
$50.00
NA
NA
$250.00
INA
NA
lCost+10%
INA
City of Rosemead 43 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Rosemead 44 Comprehensive User Fee Study
# Description
Cu went
Fee/Charge Unit Notes
1 Live Scan Fees
2 Department of Justice (DOJ)
32.00
3 FBI
49.00
4 Administrative Fee
25.00
City of Rosemead 44 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Full Cost Subsidy% Suggested Fee
FeeA
NA NA $32.00
$0.00
NA NA $49.00
$0.00
$29.63 2% $29.00
$4.00
City of Rosemead 44 Comprehensive User Fee Study
$355.72
$125.00
Current
k
Description
Fee/Charge Unit Note-
1
Permit Fees
100.00
perday
Fully burdened hourly rate
2
Community Services Officer
Fully burdened
$0.00
hourly rate
$312.00
$62.00
3
Parking Control Officer
Fully burdened
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
NA
hourly rate
$0.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
Fully burdened
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
4
Code Enforcement Officer
hourly rate
Fully burdened
5
LnsD
hourly rate
6
Special Event Permit Fees
7
Daily Permit Fees (filing application 60 days or more of
250.00
per day
event)
Daily Permit Fees (filing application 59 to 30 days of
S
event)
500.00
Fully burdened
9
Community Services Officer
hourly rate
10
Parking Control Officer
Fully burdened
hourly rate
11
Code Enforcement Officer
Fully burdened
hourly rate
Fully burdened
12
LASD
hourly rate
$355.72
$125.00
$25.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
$591.66
$312.00
$62.00
$591.66
$591.00
$91.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
NA
Fully burdened hourly rate
$0.00
City of Rosemead 45 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Ams Fine Aountfor
# Violation of R MC T Kies Fine A. ornt for First Violation Second Vi o htion
Fine Amount for
Subsequent
Violation
Unit
Notes
Fines. Violations of the Municipal Code of the ON of Rosemead shall be sub, act to
1 the fi nes shown bel ow. A subsequent vi olanon is any vi olati on where the ate was
cited one or more times In the preceding twelve (12) months for the same
violation, unless the violation was cancelled pursuant to Chapter 1.20.
Unit
par
2 5- Bust ness License and Regulations 250.00 500.00
1,000.00
3 16-Subdivlaons 250.00 500.00
1,000.00
N4
$250.00
4 1] -Zoning 250.00 500.00
1,000.00
$O so
N4
5 8-Heal[hand Safety 1,000.00 1,000.00
1,000.00
$500.00
$5,000.00
6 15- Building and Construction 100.00 500.00
1,000.00
N4
dlscrebon of the CityTreasurer
17 9.12090- Dam aging Property 500.00 11,00000
11,000.00
$0.00
N4
8 10.24- Operat on and Farm ng of Private Buses 500.00 11,00000
11,000.00
upon considering such factors
$5,000.00
9 1 Vl Olation Of all Other Code seof Ons. 100.00 125000
150000
N4
$ 00.00
#
1
0azcri
Administrative Fee
murrent Fee/Charge
2000.
Suggested Fine Amount for
First Violation
Suggested Fine
Amount for
Second
Violation
Unit
par
A penalty of 10% will beadded
This penalty will be Imposed
N4
$250.00
$500.00
$1'000 so
$O so
N4
and collected according to the
$250.00
$500.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
N4
N4
dlscrebon of the CityTreasurer
$500.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
N4
N4
$5,000.00
upon considering such factors
$5,000.00
$0.00
A penalty of 1OF6 will be added
N4
$ 00.00
$500.00
bearing on the practicability as
N4
n any delingaentfines on the
$500.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
to the cost to compute the
z
Lae Payment Penallties
last day of each month after the
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
amount owed the amount of
N4
$500.00
due date
$500.00
1 $0.00
penalty due, and Its
1.20.150 ofthe Municipal
collectability. The purpose Of
SO so
Code. All other delinquent
granting this discretion to the
fines may be referred to a
Treasurer Is to not equire
collection agency as
collection of interevtwhen It
determined by the City
ould not be cost effective.
Treasurer.
Fines that are delinquent for
sixty (60) days or more and total
at least $250 shall be processed
through the abatement and/or
assessment procedures specified
3
Collections
in rector, 120 150 of the
Municipal Code. All other
dellnquentfines may be referred
to a collection agency as
determined by the City
Treasurer.
Full Cost
$29.63
Full Cost
Subsitly%
Suggested Fine Amount for
First Violation
Suggested Fine
Amount for
Second
Violation
Suggested Fine
Amount for
Subsequent
Violation
Fee
A penalty of 10% will beadded
N4
N4
$250.00
$500.00
$1'000 so
$O so
N4
N4
$250.00
$500.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
N4
N4
$250.00
$500.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
N4
N4
$5,000.00
$b,000.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
N4
N4
$ 00.00
$500.00
$b,000.00
N4
N4
$500.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
N4
N4
$500.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
N4
N4
$500.00
$250.00
$500.00
1 $0.00
Full Cost
$29.63
Subsitly%
56%
Suggested Fee
$25.00
Fee
$5.00
A penalty of 10% will beadded
on any delinquent fines on the
$0.00
last day of each month after
the due date.
Fines that are delinquent for
sixty (60) days or more and
total at least $250 shall be
processed through the
abatement and/or assessment
procedures specified In section
1.20.150 ofthe Municipal
SO so
Code. All other delinquent
fines may be referred to a
collection agency as
determined by the City
Treasurer.
City of Rosemead 46 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Pursuant o Ordinance No. 918, which authorized the Issuance of Administrabve Citations that lmpose civiI fines upon those who violate the Rosemead Municipal Code; and
pursuant o Section 120.090 of the Rosemead Muni dpal Code which provides that fines, Interestand penalties shall be set by Qty Council resolution, Resolution No. 2011-45
established the fines, Interestand penal ties for munici pal code or olations as fol lows. (The fol lowi ng has been repri nted from Remlupon No.2011-45 for purposes of Information
and ease of reference.)
Ivo.
Ivo.
550.00
50.00
N4
N4
$100.00
There violations Include
$0.00
Removal, Abandonment or
Possession of a shopping cart
pursuant o Municipal Code
Sect on 9.12080. This fine can
be reduced to zero If, within
ten days, the Individual cited
4
Shopping CartMolations FlrstMolation
50.00
can show that a hand cartwas
purchased. The Individual
must show proof that they
have purchased a hand arc by
providing a race iptto the
Rosemead Publl cSafe N cents -
withintendays. The violation
may only be waived for the
first offense
These or olations i nclude
Removal, Abandonment or
Possession of a shopping cart
pursuant o Municipal Code
Sect on 9.12080. Thi sfinecan
be reduced to zero If, within
ten days, the Individual cited
5
Shopping CartMolations Second Molation
100.00
an show that a hand cartwas
purchased. The Individual
must show proof that they
have purchased a hand arc by
providing a race iptto the
Rosemead Publl cSafe N Cents -
within ten days . The violation
may only be waived for the
first offense
Pursuant o Ordinance No. 918, which authorized the Issuance of Administrabve Citations that lmpose civiI fines upon those who violate the Rosemead Municipal Code; and
pursuant o Section 120.090 of the Rosemead Muni dpal Code which provides that fines, Interestand penalties shall be set by Qty Council resolution, Resolution No. 2011-45
established the fines, Interestand penal ties for munici pal code or olations as fol lows. (The fol lowi ng has been repri nted from Remlupon No.2011-45 for purposes of Information
and ease of reference.)
City of Rosemead 47 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Ivo.
Ivo.
550.00
50.00
N4
N4
$100.00
$0.00
City of Rosemead 47 Comprehensive User Fee Study
WrW I LLDAN
27365 Via Industria, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590-4556
500.755.6564 Fax: 888.326.6564
951.587.3500 Fax: 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com