The URL can be used to link to this page

2200 - Kimley-Horn Planning & Engineering of Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)P0495 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PLANNING & ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) (KIMLEY-HORN) 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this 26th Day of April, 2022 (Effective Date) by and between the City of Rosemead, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 8838 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead, California 91770 ("City') and Kimley-Horn a California Corporation with its principal place of business at 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90017 ("Consultant'). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing Planning & Engineering consulting services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California and is familiar with the plans of City. 2.2 Project. City desires to engage Consultant to render Planning & Engineering Services for the Preparation of Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) ("Services") as set forth in this Agreement. 3. TERMS. 3.1 Scope of Services and Term. Kimley-Horn Page 2 of 12 3.1.1 General Scope of Services: Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment and services necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Planning & Engineering services necessary for the Project, herein referred to a "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a 1 -year period from the Effective Date shown above, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant. 3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.2.2 Schedule of Services: Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements: All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City. Kimley-Horn Page 3 of 12 3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel: Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. 3.2.5 City's Representative: The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City's Representative or his or her designee. 3.2.6 Consultant's Representative: Consultant hereby designates Jean Fares, or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her professional skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.2.7 Coordination of Services: Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees: Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant represents that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Kimley-Horn Page 4 of 12 Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. 3.2.9 Laws and Regulations: Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with applicable local state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any liability to the extent found to be arising out of any failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.2.10 Insurance: Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit B attached to and part of this agreement. 3.2.11 Safety: Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of its employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.3 Fees and Payments. 3.3.1 Compensation: Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement and shall not exceed Forty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Nineteen Dollars and Ninety Four Cents ($48,619.94) and in accordance with consultant's proposal dated March 10, 2022. Consultant's proposal is hereby incorporated and found in Exhibit "A". Extra Work may be authorized in writing, as described below, and will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. Kimley-Horn Page 5 of 12 3.3.2 Payment of Compensation: Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 30 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses: Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City. 3.3.4 Extra Work: At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City's Representative. 3.3.5 Prevailing Wages: Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws to the extent they are applicable to Consultant. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft; classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.4 Accounting Records. 3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection: Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, Kimley-Horn Page 6 of 12 and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.5 General Provisions. 3.5.1 Termination of Agreement. 3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination: City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination: If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents/ Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.5.1.3 Additional Services: In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.5.2 Delivery of Notices: All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT CITY: Kimley-Horn 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Jean Fares Tel: (213) 261-4040 City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: Michael Chung. P.E. Director of Public Works Kimley-Horn Page 7 of 12 Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty- eight (48) hours by certified mail or deposit in the U.S. Mail, first-class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality. 3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property: This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. The Documents & Data are intended for use solely with respect to the project for which they were prepared. Any reuse or modification by City shall be at City's sole risk. 3.5.3.2 Confidentiality: All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. Kimley-Horn Page 8 of 12 3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts: The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.5.5 Attorney's Fees: If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of such action as part of prevailing party's total damages as determined by court of competent jurisdiction or as agreed upon by the parties in settlement. 3.5.6 Indemnity and Defense. a. Indemnity and Defense To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless Agency and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including legal counsel's fees and costs, to the extent caused by the negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants (or any agency or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of services under this agreement. Consultant's duty to indemnify and hold harmless Agency shall not extend to the Agency's sole or active negligence. b. Duty to Defend In the event the Agency, its officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding arising from the performance of the services encompassed by this agreement, and upon demand by Agency, Consultant shall defend the Agency at Consultant's cost or at Agency's option, to reimburse Agency for its costs of defense, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in the defense of such matters to the extent the matters arise from, relate to or are caused by Consultant's negligent acts, errors or omissions. Payment by Agency is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this provision. In the event of any dispute between Consultant and Agency, as to whether liability arises from the sole or active negligence of the Agency or its officers, employees, or agents, Consultant will be obligated to pay for Agency's defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating the Agency as solely or actively negligent. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the design professional exceed the design professional's proportionate percentage of fault. 3.5.7 Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior Kimley-Horn Page 9 of 12 negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.5.8 Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Los Angeles County. 3.5.9 Time of Essence: Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. Consultant shall not have liability for any delays, expenses, losses damages or be deemed in breach for liabilities which are caused by any factor outside of its reasonable control including but not limited to natural disasters, epidemics, pandemics quarantine restrictions adverse weather, or acts of the City, third parties, or governmental agencies. 3.5.10 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants: City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.5.11 Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties. 3.5.12 Assignment or Transfer: Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.5.13 Construction; References; Captions: Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 3.5.14 Amendment; Modification: No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. Kimley-Horn Page 10 of 12 3.5.15 Waiver: No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 3.5.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries: There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.5.17 Invalidity; Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.5.18 Prohibited Interests: Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City's Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.5.19 Equal Opportunity Employment: Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.5.20 Labor Certification: By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. Kim ley-Horn Page 11 of 12 3.5.21 Authority to Enter Agreement: Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 3.5.22 Counterparts: This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.6 Subcontracting. 3.6.1 Prior Approval Required: Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. [Signatures on next Page] Kimley-Horn Page 12 of 12 CITY OF ROSEMEAD 2'I 22 Ben Kim, Actieg City Manager Date Attest:- _ _ *Dal Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk Approved as to Form: pt�741rij '101--;,�'12 2, Rachel Richman Date City Attorney KIMLEY-HORN By: 0Jtan 1 Name: Y • V. {Fy Gl it JAA4 Title: [If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR Vice President AND Secretary, AND CORPORATE SEAL OF CONTRACTOR REQUIRED] By:04�- Name: �� 1.��l�tl�Y7lVa1R(y�(►{�1�Z5 Title: Sf • x �` �"� ''o EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES/ RATE SCHEDULE Planning & Engineering Services for the Preparation of LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) Had r 74 'rte-, c- y I ,t-�• .y - 7 � '� -.- ��- \ � Planning & Engineering Services for the Preparation of LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) Had r Cover Letter March 10, 2022 s 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Michael Chung TEL 213.261.4040 Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 RE: Proposal for Planning & Engineering Services for the Preparation of Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) RFP No. 2022-04 Dear Mr. Chung and Members of the Selection Committee: The City of Rosemead (City) is seeking the assistance of a qualified consultant in the preparation of a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). As an industry leader in safety, Kimley-Hom is well-qualified and dedicated to providing unique consulting services to the City for your LRSP. We bring the established experience to develop an LRSP that is tailored to your local procedures, desires, and issues while maintaining accordance with state and federal guidelines. The following benefits prove that Kimley-Horn is well-suited to support the City on this project: familiarity with LRSPs. Kimley-Horn is devoted to supporting local agencies in recommending safety enhancements in areas throughout California. Our team's knowledge ranges from traffic safety planning and engineering to bicycle and pedestrian facility planning, safety, and design. We have completed LRSPs and Systemic Safety Analysis Reports (SSARs), Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) projects, Road Safety Audits (RSAs), Safety Management Plans (SMPs), data collection and crash analysis, and design of safety countermeasures throughout the country, including for the cities of Santa Clarita, Artesia, Lancaster, Ventura, Anaheim, San Clemente, Seal Beach, Costa Mesa, Eastvale, Chino, Perris, Goleta, Palm Desert, La Quinta, Santa Cruz, and Sunnyvale as well as the counties of Imperial and Ventura. Our previous experience and lessons learned from these projects have afforded us the information to develop effective and cast -efficient LRSPs. Kimley-Horn's familiarity with the LRSP process will assure your project is accomplished successfully. ®Tailored Solutions. Our firm's diverse experience in safety-related projects has allowed us to develop a fine-tuned approach to safety. We will deliver innovative techniques to generate the best results for the City, providing you with a prioritized list of low-cost safety improvements that can be applied not only at challenging segments, but also throughout the City. This can be used and applied toward Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP) grants for application—another area Kimley-Horn has significant experience in and can provide solutions for the City's needs. ®Local Management and Commitment to Your Success. Through our established past, Kimley-Horn proves that we are dedicated to surpassing expectations and serving local cities alike. Project manager and point of contact Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSPm brings more than 15 years of professional traffic safety management experience, along with experience completing over 30 LRSPs to the proposed project. Darryl's experience in supporting and leading transportation planning and engineering projects is evidence of his continued success with LRSPs. For this endeavor, Darryl will be supported by principal -in -charge Jean Fares, P.E., who brings 30 years of professional traffic and transportation engineering experience to the project, along with QC/QA reviewer Mike Colety, P.E., PTOE, RSP,., project engineer Jason Melchor, P.E., project planner Kyle McGowan, AICP, and project analysts Amanda Forsans and Zander Dally. Kimley-Horn will pair our in-house, certified team with Crossroads Software, Inc., a California-based software development company specializing in software for traffic divisions of police departments and traffic engineering departments, to provide Data Collection services on the project. Kimley-Horn is committed to providing you high-level, professional services and is excited for the opportunity to further enhance the safety of the City's streets from our local downtown Los Angeles office. We intend to perform the services requested and concur that all elements of the RFP have been reviewed and understood. Should you have any questions about our proposal or necessitate any additional information, please contact our project manager Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP, at 213.261.4039, at darryf.depencier®kimley-hom.com, or at the address listed above. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP, Project Manager/Point of Contact City al Rosemead - RSRD96004.2022 147 44A Jean Fares, RE.* Senior Vice President/Principal-in-Charge As a Senior Vice President of the firm, Jean Fares, P.E. has the authority to bind Kimley-Horn and execute agreements on bAalf of the firm. Kimley>»Horn Table of Contents Cover Letter Table of Contents Section 1. Approach, and Scope of Work.....................................................................................1 Section 2. Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes...............................................................11 Section 3. Company Qualifications.............................................................................................19 Section4. References.................................................................................................................24 Section 5. Standard City Contract and Insurance Requirements.................................................25 Section 6. Addenda Acknowledgement......................................................................................26 FeeProposal..............................................................................................................................27 City of RoUffmad . R9W604.2022 Kimley>»Horn Section 1. Approach, and Scope of Work Project Understanding The City of Rosemead is taking a major step towards enhanced roadway safety through the development of an LRSP. This plan will help the City identify the factors that contribute most to local traffic collisions and will better position the City for safety funding from state and federal grant programs. Kimley-Horn has extensive experience with the California HSIP including the development of the HSIP Implementation Plan at the statewide level, and recently received over $30M in HSIP grants in Cycle 10. The goal of the LRSP is to develop countermeasures that can be systemically implemented to reduce the risk of collisions on City streets. Kimley-Horn's approach builds that toolbox using three separate processes: Q Identify Citywide emphasis areas such as impaired driving or active transportation that represent a large proportion of traffic injuries © Identify site-specific case studies that are representative of other locations in the City for a more detailed audit and focused countermeasures © Review Citywide policies, programs, resources, and practices that may have an impact of traffic safety, then identify opportunities to align with safety best practices This study is important because of economic losses in the City of Rosemead in addition to the trauma of injury and loss of life. The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) most recently ranked Rosemead 8 of 105 peer cities in 2019 for traffic injuries after normalizing for population and VMT, which suggests that the City has a worse -than -average safety performance for its size. The OTS ranking for several categories is listed in Table 1 below. Alcohol-related collisions are the three categories in which Rosemead ranked the lowest in its peer group. Table 1. Office of Traffic Safety Rankings (2019) Kimley-Hom is the lead consultant supporting Caltrans' Strategic SHSP and HSIP Implementation Plan. The SHSP outlines statewide priorities and emphasize areas that, when comparing fatalities and serious injuries over the last 10 years against statewide trends for SHSP challenge areas, Rosemead crashes more often involved pedestrians, bicycles, and aging drivers. Fewer collisions involved occupant protection, impaired driving, or lane departure. Table 2 on the following page shows the statewide fatal and severe injury collisions in comparison to data from the City of Rosemead. City or Rosemead RSRD96004.222 Kimley>))Horn•1 CountyYear oup 2019 rVICTIMS LOS ANGELES COUNTY KILLED: INJURED C -77 OTS RANKING Total Fatal and Injury 255 8 out of 105 Alcohol Involved 11 74 out of 105 Had Been Drinking Driver < 21 0 57 out of 105 Had Been Drinking Driver 21 - 34 1 82 out of 105 Motorcycles 8 26 out of 105 Pedestrians 18 18 out of 105 Pedestrians < 15 2 51 out of 105 Pedestrians 65+ 7 8 out of 105 Bicyclists 16 16 out of 105 Bicyclists < 15 1 54 out of 105 Composite TYPE OF 81 42 out of 105 OTS RANKING Speed Related 31 22 out of 105 Nighttime (9:00pm — 2:59am) 1 23 13 out of 105 Hit and Run 1 15 24 out of 105 Kimley-Hom is the lead consultant supporting Caltrans' Strategic SHSP and HSIP Implementation Plan. The SHSP outlines statewide priorities and emphasize areas that, when comparing fatalities and serious injuries over the last 10 years against statewide trends for SHSP challenge areas, Rosemead crashes more often involved pedestrians, bicycles, and aging drivers. Fewer collisions involved occupant protection, impaired driving, or lane departure. Table 2 on the following page shows the statewide fatal and severe injury collisions in comparison to data from the City of Rosemead. City or Rosemead RSRD96004.222 Kimley>))Horn•1 Table Z Fatal & Severe Injuries- Statewide vs. Rosemead Challenge Areas Bicyclists Statewide , (2009 -2018) 1 8.29% , , (2009 -2018) 15 Rosemead ,Collisions (20+09 -2018) 16.30% Difference 8.01% Pedestrians 19.23% 25 27.17% 7.95% Aging Drivers 12.36% 16 17.39% 5.03% Driver Licensing 24.67% 34 25.56% 0.90% Aggressive Driving 33.09% 31 33.70% 0.61% Work Zones 1.43% 0 0.00% -1.43% Distracted Driving 5.02% 3 3.26% -1.76% Intersections 23.62% 20 21.74% -1.88% Commercial Vehicles 6.37% 4 4.35% -2.03% Young Drivers 13.09% 6 6.52% -6.57% Motorcyclists 20.98% 12 13.04% -7.94% Occupant Protection 14.22% 5 5.43% -8.78% Impaired Driving 25.27% 15 16.30% -8.97% Lane Departure 43.26% 24 26.09% -17.17% Available for Fatal Only Kimley-Hom has analyzed the TIMS data for the City from 2016-2020. Our preliminary analysis explored the following collision categories: Collision Severity 6.2% of the injury collisions from 2016-2020 resulted in a fatality or severe injury. A majority of the injury collisions resulted in complaints of pain. Table 3 shows the breakdown of injury collisions by injury severity. Table 3. Collisions by Severity Level (Crashes Resulting in Injury Only) Severity Fatal Count 8 Percent 0.8% Severe Injury 52 5.4% Visible Injury 377 39.5% Complaint of Pain 518 54.2% Total 955 100.0°/0 Collision Type The most common types of collisions in the City were rear end and broadside, totaling 62.8% of crashes in the City. A full breakdown of the collision types is shown in Table 4 below and continued on the following page. Table 4. Collisions by Type Collision Type Unknown Count 6 Percent 0.6% Head On 81 8.5% Sideswipe 114 11.9% Rear End 283 29.6% Broadside 317 33.2% Hit Object 33 3.5% City of Rosemead RSRD96004.2022 Kimley0Horn • 2 Collision Type count Percent Overturned 6 0.60% Pedestrian 86 9.0% Other 29 3.0% Total 955 100.1 Primary Collision Factor The most common factor that led to collisions in the City was automobile right-of-way violation (24.7%), with the other two most prominent collision factors being unsafe speed (18.1 %) and improper turning (13.6%). A full breakdown of the primary collision factors is shown in Table 5. Table 5. Collisions by Primary Collision Factor Unknown 29 3.0% Impaired Driving 23 2.4% Unsafe Speed 173 18.1% Following Too Closely 74 7.7% Wrong Side of Road 26 2.7% Improper Passing 12 1.3% Unsafe Lane Changes 38 4.0% Improper Turning 130 13.6% Automobile Right of Way 236 24.7% Pedestrian Right of Way 39 4.1% Pedestrian Violation 37 3.9% Traffic Signals and Signs 94 9.8% Hazardous Parking 1 0.1% Other Hazardous Violation 8 0.8% Other than Driver 7 0.7% Unsafe Starting or Backing 28 2.9% Total 955 100.0% Collision `Involved With' Nearly 70% of the collisions in the City were between two or more moving motor vehicles. However, there were also several crashes with fixed objects, parked cars, pedestrians, and bicycles. Pedestrian and bicycle crashes in particular resulted in a higher rate of severe injuries. Table 6 below and continued on the following page shows a full breakdown of these collisions, what object they involved, and the resulting injury levels. Table 6. Collisions by 'involved With' Vehicle Involved With Other Im Wi Other Motor Vehicle 18 221 394 663 Parked Motor Vehicle - 1 33 14 48 Fixed Object 2 3 16 19 40 Pedestrian 3 16 38 33 90 Bicycle 2 12 41 38 93 Motor Vehicle on Other Roadway 1 1 2 23 15 41 City of Rosemead , RSR096004.2022 Kimley)»Horn 3 Other Object 2 1 3 Non -Collision 2 3 5 Unknown 1 1 2 Total 8 52 377 518 955 Figure 1 and Table 7 show the concentration of injury crashes in Rosemead and highlights the 10 most economically impactful intersections in the City. Figure 1. Injury Crashes by Intersection t� San GabfiN �S Intersection Crashes Fatal x 4F. CP :7 1 F+Wv '^5.. Walnut Grove Ave f 1 11 AIhN11Mi _ Ci NorF i� 2 _ Muscatel Avenue 0 1 13 7 cr e. 3 Valley Boulevard Ivar Avenue 3 1 9 5 $3,875,200 3 s Marshall Street Rosemead Boulevard 3c 1 1 12 $3,303,100 5 Garvey Avenue San Gabriel Boulevard 0 0 8 19 $2,675,500 6 Valley Boulevard Walnut Grove Ave 0 0 4 18 m FSrc�e 51 i WV��n Plvv' G'.e .f. •an° - StYY1W nl.0 i m h E ENvwavMm a 2C EI Monb r FF `1�npW1 6W En,avmYe$ °P EEm.n_G.' _ •• Bl Zm .. �alaia Z Y E6w.ty R.s� • EPsve/avY WnE•E•y VarM ` Ex.u.m IF, _ • - Eeu,al a.. IF FFFI c nn- • o Number Crashes 's E 8a11i" 'r• of 4om• .P _ 0-1 • 5-10 11 -17 • 59-30 ci \, o 5 Table 7. Ten Most Economically Impactful Intersections Rank Intersection Crashes Fatal SI V1 CP Cost 1 Garvey Ave Walnut Grove Ave 0 1 11 13 $4,807,000 2 Valley Boulevard Muscatel Avenue 0 1 13 7 $4,606,200 3 Valley Boulevard Ivar Avenue 0 1 9 5 $3,875,200 4 Marshall Street Rosemead Boulevard 0 1 1 12 $3,303,100 5 Garvey Avenue San Gabriel Boulevard 0 0 8 19 $2,675,500 6 Valley Boulevard Walnut Grove Ave 0 0 4 18 $2,025,400 City of Rosemead RSR096004.2022 KimleyoHorn 4 7 Valley Boulevard Rio Hondo Avenue (East) 0 0 4 7 $1,135,500 8 Valley Boulevard Rosemead Boulevard 0 0 4 7 $1,135,500 9 SR -164 / Rosemead Blvd Glendon Way 0 0 3 7 $993,200 10 Valley Boulevard Rio Hondo Ave (West) 0 0 4 2 $731,000 The LRSP will identify the factors associated with the most vehicle crashes particular to the City and will identify matching countermeasures to reduce or eliminate those crashes. Figure 1 on the previous page shows where traffic injuries were most concentrated in Rosemead. Our team uses custom GIS -based tools to evaluate the roadway system and intersections using Highway Safety Manual statistical methods. This allows for independent evaluation of intersections by control type and roadways by function. Our team then applies additional statistics to rate each location for crash severity, crash type patterns, driver behavior factors, and roadway conditions. Our analysis procedures are outlined in the exhibit to the right. Kimley-Horn works closely with Crossroads allowing us to seamlessly input their most recent available crash data. Our custom in-house software can process the collected crash records to provide a ranked order of intersections and roadway segments by crash activity consistent with the Local Roadway Safety Manual, provide a statistical evaluation of crash rates for each location relative to Citywide norms, and highlight locations with unusually high crash severities or crash patterns that can help diagnose safety challenges. Kimley-Horn's approach to the LRSP development centers on the creation of a countermeasure toolbox that includes items that address both infrastructure and driver behavior. A combination of crash history, roadway characteristics, and stakeholder feedback is used to determine which countermeasures will have the most safety benefit relative to cost for the City. The toolbox is then used to produce three products as part of the LRSP: 0 Citywide Systemic Infrastructure Projects: Serious injury crashes in Rosemead are more likely to impact pedestrians and bicyclists than in other parts of California. The LRSP would likely include a number of low -cast systemic countermeasures such as high visibility crosswalks, painted bike lanes, leading pedestrian intervals, or additional sidewalks, where warranted, on the local street network. © Local Infrastructure Projects: For example, the LRSP would likely consider signal timing changes such as moving to protected left or flashing yellow arrow, installation of advanced dilemma zone detection, and retroreflective backplates. © Non -Infrastructure Projects: Serious injury and fatal crashes in Rosemead are more commonly associated with bicycles and pedestrians. The LRSP could explore opportunities to improve collaboration between law enforcement and schools to deliver education programs for bicycle safety. The team could also evaluate City ordinances and policies on bicycle helmets, riding on sidewalks and other bicycle safety considerations. The following scope of services outlines how Kimley-Horn will build off of the City's current plans to provide a well-rounded framework for an ongoing safety improvement program. The LRSP will be structured to make the City more competitive for grant funding, better able to identity and prioritize safety needs, and encourage safer driving practices of its residents. Work Plan Task 1.1 - Kick -Off meeting and Project Administration Kimley-Hom will prepare an agenda and conduct a project kick-off meeting to review and refine the project methodology and schedule and to establish a Project Development Team (PDT) with key City staff, which we will maintain close and consistent communication through regular PDT status meetings to discuss plan development and project progress. Meetings are anticipated to be held virtually given current conditions. City of aommead - RSRD96004.2022 KimleyoHorn • 5 Kimley-Horn will assist the City in providing administrative support to make sure the project is in compliance with the Local Assistance Procedure Manual guidelines. Kimley-Hom has established internal quality control processes that include multiple levels of review before deliverables are submitted to a client, including a designated quality control manager that is not part of the core project team to provide objective feedback from the perspective of someone external to the project. Kimley-Hom recommends in-person meetings, if conditions allow, at the following project milestones: 1. Project kick-off 3. Field review debrief 2. Selection of high -collision sites for project development 4. Project recommendations Additionally, Kimley-Horn will hold a short bi-weekly project progress meeting with the City project manager to discuss the current status of the project and to make decisions about project direction as alternative courses emerge. During our kick-off meeting, we will identify safety partners/stakeholders who should be included in future project communications. We value representation from the local community, businesses, non-profit organizations, local transportation providers, City's Public Works Department, Public Safety Department, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Los Angeles County Fire Department, Rosemead/EI Monte/Garvey School Districts, and health and safety agencies when creating a well-rounded safety plan. Task 1.2 - Identify Stakeholders Kimley-Hom will work with the City to identify stakeholders that will be engaged throughout the LRSP process. Key stakeholders will include those identified during the Wck-off meeting in Task 1. Task 1.3 - Identify Project Goals and Objectives We will work with City staff to establish goals and objectives after completing the comprehensive data analysis with a focus on improving traffic and pedestrian safety. We will establish the emphasis areas. The team will identify safety challenges specific to the City of Rosemead that are elevating the risk of traffic injuries. The goals and objectives will be structured to meet the needs of the LRSP Program, provide optimal support of statewide funding priorities, and incorporate Priority Safety Strategies, Infrastructure Safety Projects, and Behavioral Safety Strategies and feedback from stakeholders and City staff. Each goal will be associated with a set of objectives that will help determine the prioritization of plan recommendations. Task 1.4 - Stakeholder Meetings Kimley-Hom will work with the City to reach out to safety partners/stakeholders from the contact list developed. Up to three stakeholder meetings will be hosted, either virtually or in-person (as COAD restrictions allow), to provide two-way communication and feedback on the materials communicated. The meeting will provide an overview of the LRSP process, identify/establish safety goals, objectives, strategies and emphasis areas, inform those present on the results found during the crash analysis, and outline the draft countermeasures and potential solutions. Stakeholders will be utilized for their local insight on the area, any challenges or opportunities they may know of, and their knowledge of "near -miss crashes." Any potential additions or changes to the recommended countermeasures, based on the feedback received during this meeting, will be discussed with the City. The group will prioritize plans for implementation and be able to review and comment on the draft and final LRSP before recommending approval of the document to be adopted by City Council. • Project kick-off meeting » Draft project goals and objectives Field notes Project update meeting agenda & notes » Stakeholder meetings Attendance at traffic advisory Monthly progress reports " Field visit package (crash diagrams, committee meetings " Stakeholder identification list note sheets, site visit maps) Task 2.1 - Literature Review We will conduct a literature review of existing plans published by the City, including the General Plan. Documents produced by LA Metro, SCAG, and Caltrans will also be reviewed to identify projects, policies, and programs that are in place or recommended that might be of value to this analysis. Our team is already familiar with Cahrans procedures and guidance on the development of SSAR and LRSP plans and will provide a summary as part of this task. City of Rosemead RSRD96004.2022 KimleyoHorn • 6 Task 2.2 - Best Practices Analysis Kimley-Horn will work with City staff to identify programs and policies within the City that are most supportive of safety, which ones could be updated to better align with current best practices, and where there are opportunities for new initiatives that would likely support safer roads and better driving behaviors. We will collect the needed information by providing the City with a list of questions in advance, and will conduct an interview with City staff to finalize the responses. Task 2 Deliverables: �' Ouestion list of current practices for the City Technical Memorandum #1: Existing Plans and Programs Task 3. Data Collection & Analysis - Kimley-Hom will perform a comprehensive data analysis review. Our approach to safety analysis includes statistical network screening using Highway Safety Manual Methods. These methods are selected to identify locations with higher than expected collision activity that can be reviewed to identify roadway and intersection characteristics associated with higher risk. These methods also review a variety of collision characteristics to identify locations where specific types of collisions are over -represented. This helps to diagnose safety factors that are leading to elevated numbers of collisions. The first screening step is to develop critical crash rates for segments and intersections in the City. Average crash rates are developed for intersections based on control type, and roadway segments based on functional classification. A statistical threshold is then established based on daily traffic volumes for each segment and intersection. The difference between the actual crash rate and the critical crash rate for each location can then be used to estimate the relative risk faced by users of the given intersection or segment. This method builds on the High Collision or High Injury Networks that essentially mirror High Traffic networks to provide deeper insight into potential low-cost safety measures. Roadways and intersections with lower classifications will also be identified, allowing the _RSP to broach risk factors associated with those roadways. The second screening step focuses on crash type over -representation. Citywide data is used to determine the typical collision type mix for each of the functional classifications and intersection control types. Then the mixture is reviewed for each segment and intersection to highlight those with high concentrations of a specific collision factor. Factors analyzed would include: • Fatal collisions • Fatal + serious injury collisions • Broadside collisions • Rear -end collisions • Sideswipe collisions • Head-on collisions • Single vehicle collisions (run off road, fixed object, parked vehicle, other) • Bicycle collisions • Pedestrian collisions • Wet/slippery road collisions • Nighttime collisions • Collisions involving alcohot/drugs • Collisions involving driver inattention • Collisions involving speeding/aggressive driving The resulting list would include both the number of collisions for each factor, and the probability that any excess is not random. Kimley-Horn will provide an inventory of sites including all roadway segments and intersections with three or more collisions (needed for statistical evaluation) ranked by overall number of collisions per Local Roadway Safety Manual Guidance. Kimley-Horn will then recommend up to ten locations for further evaluation and potential project development based on amount of collision activity, collision severity, unusual collision patterns, and site variability to maximize the potential number of systemic factors, and mitigations identified. We will identify potential conflicts between vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles. Task 3.2 - Roadway Characteristics Inventory Kimley-Horn will obtain available data on roadway functional classification, intersection control, schools, parks, transit stops, and other roadway characteristics that impact safety. Available traffic volume data will also be collected from the City. City of Rosemead RSRD96004.2022 Kimley)Morn • 7 Task 3.3 - Field Tour At up to ten identified high -collision locations (key corridors and intersections) identified in Task 2, field assessments with City staff will be conducted to collect additional information to better match roadway characteristics with collision activity, allowing the team to diagnose issues and develop systemic recommendations. Deficiencies per the Highway Design Manual and other regulatory and guidance documents will be identified at these locations. Technical Memorandum #2: Citywide Safety Background and Trends " List of intersection and segments with statistically analyzable collision activity " Citywide safety trends and recommended focus areas " Crash diagrams for high crash locations List of potential local countermeasures Task 4. Countermeasure Development Task 4.1 - Develop Priority Criteria and Priority Areas Kimley-Horn will work with the City and stakeholders to develop priority criteria and identify priority areas that will be used to develop the countermeasures in Task 4.2. These countermeasures will address these priority areas and will align with state and federal countermeasures that have been identified to assist in reducing fatal & injury collisions. Task 4.2 - Identify Countermeasures The identification of the potential projects will be developed by examining the crash data and determining the appropriate countermeasures improvements to roadway segments. The team will prepare a toolbox of systemic safety mitigations that can be applied citywide, or on key parts of the network. Countermeasures will include a mixture of infrastructural improvements, educational initiatives, law enforcement strategies, emergency response, policy updates, coordination activities, and other items that will contribute to the overall tapestry of roadway safety in the City. We will identify safety measures that are appropriate, cost efficient, and proven effective countermeasures by the US Department of Transportation and the FHWA. The toolbox will be developed in three steps: 1. The site visit locations will be used as case studies. Solutions that emerge from those will be associated with the conditions they are addressing and added to the toolbox. 2. The team will Identify up to three safety emphasis areas for the City based on collision trends and patterns that can be looked at holistically to identify broader strategies that can be employed to address them. 3. The best practices review will be used to identify actions the City can take to improve the safety environment. An implementation plan will be developed for inclusion in the LSRP report that will help the City prioritize improvements and identify potential funding sources while remaining responsive to funding opportunities for HSIP and related grants, including evolving needs as plan implementation progresses. Task 4.3 - Develop Priority Projects Kimley-Horn will provide recommendations for operational safety improvements and develop project sheets for up to five high crash locations to improve roadway, traffic, and pedestrian safety. The sheets will profile the existing safety performance of the location, will include an aerial photo and map, and will outline potential countermeasures that had been identified through the safety analysis and workshop tasks and been approved by the City. Each countermeasure will also have a reported benefit/cost. These sheets will provide the City with a scalable overview of the most cost-effective safety options at each location based on the level of resources available, allowing for phased implementation of multiple countermeasures, or to go straight to implementation of the most cost-effective solutions. Projects will be reviewed and recommended for available grants. List of priority criteria & priority areas " Cost estimates, mapping, and cost/benefit ratio " Safety Countermeasure Toolbox of proposed safety improvements " Up to ten (10) project sheets including list of potential projects City of Rosemead RSR096004.2022 Kimley)»Horn • 8 Task 5. Implementation Program Projects will be analyzed on their potential to reduce crash activity. Projects with the greatest and most cost-efficient crash reduction potential will be prioritized. Short-term, medium-term, and longer-term projects will be identified based on their cost and likelihood of reducing crashes. The Kimley-Horn team will work with the City to develop an action plan, and provide guidance for securing funding to address recommendations and achieve the goals and objectives idenfified for the LRSP. This plan will also include a program for updates to the LRSP and an analysis procedure that City staff can use to update the network screening results to determine the effectiveness of countermeasures that have been implemented and to establish new priorities as existing ones are addressed and as roadway conditions and driver expectations change. I Three (3) project packages for grant applications Technical Memorandum #3: Implementation Plan Task 6.1 -Draft LRSP Kimley-Horn will prepare a draft LRSP to document the findings of the previous tasks. The draft report will be submitted to the City for review and comment and we will assist in circulating the draft LRSP to identified stakeholders for review. Kimley-Horn will collect a consolidated set of comments from City staff and stakeholders to refine the report into a final document. Task 6.2 - Final LRSP Kimley-hom will respond to all comments and incorporate feedback received on the draft LRSP into the final LRSP. This document will guide the City's effort to improving transportation safety and reducing the number of incidents and the severity of those incidents on our transportation systems. The LRSP will be a living document and analysis methods will be clearly outlined to facilitate future updates as the City completes projects, gets new collision data, as needs and priorities change, and seeks funding in future cycles after this report has reached its lifespan of up to five years per LRSP guidelines. Kimley-Hom, along with City staff, will take the lead on plan adoption and present the final LRSP to City Council. Task 6 Deliverables: Draft LFSP Final LFISP City of Rosemead • RSR096004.2022 Kimley»Horn 9 M M C L 0 _v E Y N N 2 n! N o � o E2 M o o c Cp LL 0 W N N M 6 Section 2. Project Team, Key Personnel and Resumes Our project team is unsurpassed in local knowledge and relevant experience and has been structured to provide strong support to the City of Rosemead. Notably, our team will be managed by Darryl deloencier, AICP, GISP, Was, a successful Kimley-Horn project manager with over a decade of experience on traffic safety projects. Darryl and his team have a thorough knowledge of the LRSP process and extensive experience coordinating communications between stakeholder groups and City staff throughout plan development. Darryl will serve as your point of contact and will maintain a close working relationship with City staff throughout the duration of the project. He will oversee a team of well-qualified individuals as well as one subconsultant, who are experienced in safety planning and engineering. Kimley-Horn will pair our in-house, certified team with Crossroads Software, Inc. (Crossroads), a California-based software development company specializing in software for traffic divisions of police departments and traffic engineering departments. Their systems produce and track traffic citation, traffic collision, and DUI arrest documents. With over 30 years of experience, Jeff Cullen will work alongside Kimley-Horn to collect data for this project as the Crossroads team has done on many projects across California. Kimley-Horn has the required license to perform the scope of services for this project. Specific information regarding relevant individual licenses can be found in the resumes section below. These resumes also outline the education, credentials, training, and related experience of our team members. Our team has the availability necessary to support the City throughout the term of this contract. The organizational chart below delineates the roles and responsibilities of our personnel on this pursuit. Full resumes are provided for our key personnel beginning on the following page. Organizational Chart 71(x; OSE AD Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSPze Jason Melchor, P.E. Kyle McGowan, AICP Amanda Forsans Zander Dally City of Rosemead RSRD96004.2022 Data Collection Jeff Cullen (Crossroads) Kimley»Horn it Resumes Darryl dePencier, AMP, LISP, RSP2111 Project Manager/Point of Contact Darryl has been conducting transportation safety for more than 15 years. He has developed tools to root out the spatial relationships between crash events to determine the factors and conditions that increase the probability of vehicle crashes. His experience ranges from establishing safety policy language to network screening, crash site engineering reviews and developing countermeasure toolboxes. Darryl also conducts statistical analyses of crash activity using methods presented in the Highway Safety Manual, the Local Roadway Safety Manual, and customized analyses for unusual locations or conditions. He has worked on studies at the statewide, regional, local, and site-specific levels that include guidance documents, LRSPs, safety thresholds and audits, and local countermeasure recommendations. Relevant Experience • City of Artesia, LRSP, Artesia, CA — Project Manager • City of Santa Clarita, SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA — Project Planner • City of Anaheim, LRSP, Anaheim, CA — Project Planner • City of Eastvale, SSAR Eastvale, CA — Project Manager • City of Perris, LRSP, Perris, CA — Project Manager • City of Palm Desert, LRSP, Palm Desert, CA— Project Planner • City of Imperial Beach, LRSP, Imperial Beach, CA — Project Planner • City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSAR/LRSP, Goleta, CA — Project Planner • City of Santa Cruz, LRSP, Santa Cruz, CA — Project Manager Professional Credentials • Master of Science, Urban Spatial Analysis, University of Pennsylvania • Bachelor of Science, Geography, Carleton University, Ottawa • Certificate, Geographic Information Systems, Algonquin College, Ottawa • American Institute of Certified Planners #026552 • Geographic Information Systems Professional #59317 • Road Safety Professional, #273 • Road Safety Professionaha #17 • Caltrans, Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Implementation, Statewide, CA — Project Planner • Caltrans, Safety Performance Measure Target Setting Analysis, Statewide, CA — Project Planner • County of Ventura, LRSP, Ventura County, CA — Project Manager • City of Ventura, SSAR, Ventura, CA — Project Manager • City of Lancaster, SSARP, Lancaster, CA — Project Manager • City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA — Project Planner • City of La Quinta, SSAR, La Quinta, CA — Project Planner • County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA — Project Planner • County of San Joaquin, SSAR, San Joaquin County, CA — Project Planner City of Rosemead RSRD96004.2022 Kimiey)>Horn 12 Jean Fares, P.E. Professional Credentials Principal -in -Charge • Bachelor of Science, Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • Professional Engineer in CA #TR2097 Jean has more than 30 years of professional experience in the fields of traffic and transportation engineering, including systematic safety analysis, traffic signal design, signal system design, traffic signal timing, traffic operations, signing and marking plans preparation, and traffic control plans. In addition to signal design and corridor signal operations, Jean has extensive experience with ITS technologies. Relevant Experience • City of Santa Clarita, SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA — Project Manager • City of Santa Clarita, LRSP, Santa Clarita, CA — Project Manager • City of Perris, LRSP, Perris, CA — QC/QA Manager • City of Palm Desert, LRSP, Palm Desert, CA — Project Manager • City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSARP/LRSP, Goleta, CA — QC/QA Manager • County of Ventura, LRSP, Ventura County, CA — Principal -in -Charge • City of Ventura, SSAR, Ventura, CA — Project Engineer • City of Chino, On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Chino, CA — Project Manager • City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA — Principal -in -Charge • County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA — Project Manager • City of Glendale, On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Glendale, CA — Project Manager • City of Thousand Oaks, On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Thousand Oaks, CA — Project Manager • City of Culver City, On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Culver City, CA — Project Manager • City of Downey, On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Downey, CA— Project Manager • County of Los Angeles, On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Los Angeles County, CA — Project Manager • City of Palmdale, On -Call Signal Design Services, Palmdale, CA — Project Manager • City of Agoura Hills, On -Call Traffic Engineering, Agoura Hills, CA— Project Director • City of Porterville, On -Call Civil and Traffic Engineering, Porterville, CA — Project Manager • County of Riverside, On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Riverside County, CA — Project Manager • City of La Quinta, SSAR, La Quinta, CA — Project Manager • City of Indio, LRSP, Indio, CA — Project Manager City of Rosemead RSRD96004.2022 KimleyoHorn 13 Mike ill P.E., PTOE, RSP21B QC/QA Mike has over 25 years of experience with the evaluation, planning, and design of transportation facilities that address the safety and mobility of all road users. He is currently leading the Update and Implementation of the SHSPs for both California and Nevada and also has extensive experience with local and regional transportation safety planning. Mike led the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) Implementation for the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) as well as assisted with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Scale and Scope of HSM Guidebook and the Guide for Scalable Risk Assessment Methods for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Mike has worked on over 10 Local Road Safety Plans and has facilitated over 30 Road Safety Audits. He uses his experience and lessons learned to work with agencies to complete a data -driven analysis, select cost-effective solutions and identify funding for implementation. Relevant Experience • City of Santa Clarita, LRSP, Santa Clarita, CA— Principal -In -Charge • City of Eastvale, SSAR, Eastvale, CA — OC/OA Manager Professional Credentials • Master of Science, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo • Professional Engineer in CA #60858 • Professional Traff ic Operations Engineer #1601 • Road Safety Professional, #22 • Road Safety Professional-, #7 • Road Safety Professional25#16 • City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSARP/LRSP, Goleta, CA — Principal -in -Charge • City of Santa Cruz, LRSP, Santa Cruz, CA — OC/OA Manager • Caltrans, California Strategic Highway Safety Plan Update and Implementation (SHSP), Statewide, CA — Project Manager • City of Simi Valley, LRSP, Simi Valley, CA — OC/OA Manager • City of Ventura, LRSP, Ventura County, CA — OC/OA Manager • City of Ventura, SSAR, Ventura, CA — Principal -in -Charge • County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA — Principal -in -Charge • City of La Quinta, SSAR, La Quinta, CA — Principal -in -Charge • Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), Southern Nevada Transportation Safety Plan, Las Vegas, NV — Project Manager • Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), Nevada Statewide Bicycle Plan, Las Vegas, NV — Project Manager • Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), Las Vegas Boulevard Pedestrian Study, Las Vegas, NV — Project Engineer • Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), Regional Bicycle Network Gap Analysis, Las Vegas, NV — Principal -in -Charge • NDOT, Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), Statewide, NV — Project Manager • NDOT, Highway Safety Manual Implementation, Statewide, NV — Project Manager • NDOT, Road Safety Assessment Program, Statewide, NV — Project Manager City of Rosemead � RSRD96004.2022 KimleyoHorn 14 Jason Melchor, P.E. Project Engineer Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Specialization in Transportation, University of California, Irvine _esmp� • Professional Engineer in Jason is a professional engineer with more than 20 years of experience in traffic California #C65218 engineering and transportation planning. He has worked with clients in Orange, Los • Instutute of Transportation Engineers FIE), Member Angeles, Riverside, and San Diego Counties to complete systemic safety studies, traffic . Orange County Traffic Engineering impact studies, and perform the technical analysis for a variety of safety projects, Council, Member transportation planning projects, parking studies, transit analysis, site plan reviews, and circulation studies. His traffic engineering experience includes traffic signal design, signing and striping, traffic control, and signal interconnect design plans. He has acted as in-house staff for the cities of Irvine and Huntington Beach to review development studies and design plans. In this role, Jason worked directly with developers and City staff to provide comments on plan and document submittals. Jason also has experience working with a variety of traffic engineering software programs and computer design packages. Relevant Experience • City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA — Project Manager • City of Anaheim, LRSP, Anaheim, CA — Project Manager • City of Palm Desert, LRSP, Palm Desert, CA — Project Engineer • City of Perris, LRSP, Perris, CA — Project Engineer • City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for SSAR, Goleta, CA — Project Manager • City of Santa Cruz, LRSP, Santa Cruz, CA — Project Engineer • County of Ventura, LRSP, Ventura County, CA — Project Engineer • City of La Quinta, SSAR, La Quinta, CA — Project Engineer • City of Eastvale, SSAR, Eastvale, CA — Project Engineer • City of Ventura, SSAR, Ventura, CA — Project Engineer • City of Santa Clarita, SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA — Project Engineer • County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA — Project Engineer • RCTD, Horizontal Curve Assessment, Riverside County, CA — Project Engineer • City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Boulevard and 5th Street Bikeway, Santa Ana, CA — Project Engineer • City of Anaheim, Gene Autry Way Improvements, Anaheim, CA — QC/QA Reviewer City of Rosemead RSR096004.2022 Kimley>» Horn 15 Kyle McGowan, AICP Project Planner Professional Credentials • Master of Urban Planning, University of Southern California • Bachelor of Science, Urban and Regional Planning, University of Arizona Kyle is an analyst in the traffic engineering field. His experience providing engineering • American Institute of Certified design support includes crash and roadway analyses, document review, and data Planners #33483 collection. Kyle has also been involved in the implementation of Goods Movement, Connected Vehicle, and Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) projects in southern California, where he utilized ArcGIS and design skills to prepare reports and maps of ITS infrastructure improvements. He is proficient with Synchro, Adobe Creative Suite, and SPSS. Relevant Experience • City of Santa Clarita, SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA — Analyst • City of Santa Clarita, LRSP, Santa Clarita, CA — Analyst • City of Eastvale, SSAR, Eastvale, CA—Analyst • City of Perris, LRSP, Perris, CA — Analyst • City of Palm Desert, LRSP, Palm Desert, CA —Analyst • City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSARP/LRSP, Goleta, CA —Analyst • City of Chino, Engineering & Traffic Survey — Project Manager • City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA—Analyst • County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA — Analyst • City of Indio, LRSP, Indio, CA — Analyst • County of Mono, SSAR, Mono County, NV—Analyst • City of Inglewood, Stadium Alternative Mitigation Measure: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Improvements, Inglewood, CA —Analyst • LA Metro, Arterial ITS Inventory Tool Expansion (ITS First), Los Angeles County, CA —Analyst • LA Metro, Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (RITSA) Update, Los Angeles, CA — Analyst • City of Santa Clarita, ITS Phase VII, Santa Clarita, CA — Analyst • San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego and Western Riverside Counties Regional Park & Ride Strategy, San Diego/Western, Riverside, CA—Analyst City of Rosemead RSR096004.2022 Kimley)))Horn 16 Amanda Forsans Project Analyst Professional Credentials Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, McGill University Amanda's background is in civil engineering and applied mechanics backed by successful internship experience and knowledge of engineering methods, principles, specifications, and standards. She has experience working on LRSPs in the Southern California region and is very familiar with analysis required for these projects. Relevant Experience • City of Santa Clarita, LRSP, Santa Clarita, CA — Analyst • County of Ventura, LRSP, Ventura County, CA — Analyst • City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA — Analyst • City of Costa Mesa, LRSP, Costa Mesa, CA — Analyst • City of Indio, LRSP, Indio, CA —Analyst Zander Dally Professional Credentials Project Analyst • Master of Science, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida State University • Bachelor of Science, International Relations, Florida State University Zander has technical skills in Mapping and Spatial Analysis, Graphic Design, Travel Demand Modeling, and Statistical Analysis. He is knowledgeable in ArcGIS (ArCPfo, ArcMap, ArcScene, ArcCatelog, Story Map), Adobe Creative Cloud (Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator), SketchUp, Canva, Bentley CUBE, IBM SPSS Statistics, and Microsoft Excel. Zander has previous experience working on LRSPs and similar transportation projects. Relevant Experience • City of Costa Mesa, LRSP, Costa Mesa, CA — Analyst • City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA — Analyst • City of Roseville, LRSP, Roseville, CA—Analyst • City of Tracy, LRSP, Tracy, CA — Analyst • City of Santa Maria, LRSP, Santa Maria, CA — Analyst • San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, San Gabriel Valley Transit Feasibility Study, Los Angeles County, CA — Analyst • Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT, Los Angeles County, CA — Analyst • San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, San Manuel Reservation and Casino Permitting, San Bernardino County, CA — Analyst City of Rosemead RSRD96004.2022 Kimley>))Horn 17 Crossroads Jeff Cullen fA Software Data collection Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Computer Science with Mathematics, California State University, Fullerton With more than 30 years of experience in the fields of traffic/transportation, computer applications, and software development, Jeff brings an ability to develop powerful yet practical programming/hardware solutions to each project. Some of his accomplishments in the area of computer applications for transportation engineering include: Designing, developing, and implementing software packages for traffic collision and citation reporting and analysis; traffic signal design; graphics and mapping; radar speed study analysis and summary; license plate matching; traffic signal timing and coordination; and transportation planning Using the Microsoft Windows-based Crossroads Software Collision Database package to design and implement application database systems for more than 430 agencies throughout California, Nevada, and Washington, including the cities of Los Angeles, Ventura, Long Beach, Redmond, Fresno, Stockton, and Las Vegas; the counties of Riverside, Los Angeles, Ventura, San Diego, Santa Clara, San Bernardino, and Santa Clara; and many others Developing a full -featured Traffic Control Device Inventory System using Microsoft Access complete with GIS mapping and work order tracking capabilities Supplementing Jeff's vast experience in computer systems and software development is hands-on involvement analyzing and summarizing data (utilizing Crossroads Software systems) and preparing traffic signal, preliminary engineering, and final design plans for numerous projects utilizing various design packages. Relevant Experience • City of Santa Clarita, LRSP, Santa Clarita, CA — Data Collection • City of Sarda Clarita, Cttywide SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA — Data Collection • City of Anaheim, LRSP, Anaheim, CA — Data Collection • City of Perris, LRSP, Perris, CA — Data Collection • City of Palm Desert, LRSP, Palm Desert, CA — Data Collection • City of Imperial Beach, LRSP, Imperial Beach, CA — Data Collection • City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSAR/LRSP, Goleta, CA — Data Collection • City of Sarda Cruz, LRSP, Santa Cruz, CA — Data Collection • City of Ventura, SSAR, Ventura, CA — Data Collection • City of Indio, LRSP, Indio, CA — Data Collection • City of La Quirda, SSAR, La Quints, CA— Data Collection • County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA — Data Collection City of Rosemead RSRD96004.2022 KimleyoHorn • 18 Section 3. Company Qualifications Firm Overview Kimley-Horn, a corporation, is a full-service engineering, planning, and environmental consulting firm providing a comprehensive range of services to public and private clients throughout the United States. Founded in 1967, our company has grown from a small group of traffic engineers and transportation planners to a multidisciplinary firm of more than 5,500 in 99 offices nationwide. Our 11 California offices, including local offices in Downtown Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Diego, have more than 580 engineers, planners, designers, and technicians—affording us the depth of resources (financial, equipment, labor, and capacity) reasonably necessary to staff and execute virtually any assignment in response to the City's needs for this LRSP. We provide our clients with the local knowledge and responsiveness of a small organization, backed by the depth of resources only a national firm could offer. Our organizational structure is comprised of our local office practice leaders, technical and project support staff; a regional leader; production managers; and business, human resource, and marketing managers. This structure has led to financial stability within the firm. In addition, we uphold a disciplined focus on business fundamentals operate the firm conservatively, and our internal controls and business standards— promoted by our leadership team—are intended to keep our foundation strong. We have an untapped $10 million operating line of credit available for short-term cash flow needs. The firm's cash flow continues to be very robust, and we have no history of credit problems or bankruptcy. Kimley-Horn has more than acceptable resources and lines of credit to help acquire a successful partnership and project. Kimley-Horn does not have any conditions (e.g., bankruptcy, pending litigation, planned office closures, impending merger, etc.) that may impede in our ability to According to Engineering News -Record, provide these services. Kimley-Horn's continued growth and stability over the past 55 years is the direct result of our firm's commitment to integrity and devotion to Kimley-Horn ranks loth in transportation providing quality services. The Kimley-Horn team is committed to providing the City among the nation's top 500 design firms. with high-quality solutions that will surpass your expectations. Experience and Qualifications Our proposed project team brings technical knowledge and partners that will enhance the progress of an accurate and effective LRSP. In summary, the Kimley-Horn team offers specialists for the following service areas to support you in this endeavor: 0 Traffic Engineering Our team brings comprehensive traffic engineering experience in traffic engineering and operations and traffic studies and analyses, including the evaluation of operational characteristics, safety, capacity, circulation, flow, and access. Our traffic engineers are highly -trained and capable in using software—including ASSIM, CORSIM, HCS+, Synchro/SimTraffic, SIDRA Intersection, Signal 2020, and Transyt-7F—to evaluate the operating conditions for existing or proposed roadway configurations. In addition, our staff has the ability to translate these analyses into easy -to -understand content for the general public, as well as public officials and other stakeholders. Detailed services we provide include: • Safety studies • High accident location studies • Access -Egress and internal circulation studies • Speed, classification, and volume studies • Origin -Destination studies • Traffic calming studies and cut -through analysis • Data collection • Collision analysis • Freeway, arterial, and intersection capacity analysis • Interchange justification/ modification reports • Traffic simulation/animation • Sidewalk needs studies • Asset inventory • Traffic Impact Analysis JIA) studies • Roundabout feasibility studies • Median modification studies • Maintenance of traffic plans • Expert testimony LRSP Kimley-Hom understands that an LRSP is a proactive approach to safety analysis. Existing crash patterns show part of the safety picture, but only show us where crashes have occurred, not necessarily where conditions that elevate the risk of crashes exist. An LRSP is intended to identify high crash locations within a city or county and diagnose what conditions might contribute to that elevated crash activity. The LRSP then identifies countermeasures that can be applied systemically throughout the city or county where those conditions exist to remove those higher risk conditions before crashes occur. We recognize that an LRSP is not fixed in its scope or breadth and that City of Rosemead - RSRD96004.2022 KimleyoHorn • 19 each jurisdiction faces unique safety challenges, driver behavior patterns, and historical roadway development. Our approach is to explore what is normal within the City of Rosemead. In an effort to provide completeness and to set safety benchmarks customized for the City, our approach will be to: • Refine the work plan with City staff • Conduct a citywide network screening to establish crash rate benchmarks for intersections and roadway segments • Identify locations with the highest crash volumes and highest risk factors based on network screening (from the designated corridors and intersections) • Map crash patterns at higher crash locations • Conduct field review of higher crash locations • Identify countermeasures that would likely reduce crashes • Establish template projects and benefittcost assessments to produce short, medium, and long-term projects that the City can pursue funding for • Actively engage with stakeholders • Focus on driver behavior factors as well as roadway engineering 0 Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning We prioritize implementable solutions that enable safe and comfortable access for multimodal users, accounting for bicyclists and pedestrians of various ages and abilities. Our bicycle and pedestrian planning experience includes municipal, regional, and statewide plans, corridors, and wayhnding studies. We have successfully actualized countless on -street bikeway, sidewalk, and greenway designs as well as innovative operational studies such as for in -road bicycle detection systems. We are frequentty asked to take our bicycle and pedestrian planning projects from design to construction administration, demonstrating our clients' trust in the quality of our project delivery and resulting product. OTraffic Data Collection Our team members are skilled at using manual and advanced technology to collect traffic data. Based on the need, our team can rapture field data with basic methods or through the use of portable GPS devices that allow digital photo linking capabilities and direct importation into GIS mapping and software such as ESRI ArcGIS. We take care to obtain accurate data because it is the basis for a traffic study. Often, some data (such as accident reports or recent traffic counts) can be obtained from existing sources. However, if new data is needed, Kimley-Horn knows the criteria for data collection, documentation, and compilation. Grant Writing Our planning studies are geared toward practical, community-based solutions that meet the objectives of many grant programs. We have a consistent record of winning grants from the Active Transportation Program (ATP), Smart Growth Program, and HSIP. With our recent experience completing the statewide HSIP implementation plan, we have the most direct pipeline to obtaining funding. In the past few years alone, we have helped clients secure more than $200 million for the implementation of various projects. We can harness our experience to assist the City with understanding deadlines, application processes, and scoring criteria associated with grant funding. Identifying projects through the LRSP is an Important first step; getting them funded and built is key to actualizing change. Caltrans Knowledge Kimley-Hom has completed projects in more than 70 municipalities in California, many of which involved some level of coordination with Caltrans. As a result, we have developed a clear understanding of standards, procedures, and local assistance programs. Our established relationships with Caltrans staff in various districts, including District 7, and our experience on the ongoing SHSP project will prove useful to future LRSPs. Kimley-Hom and the proposed team offer insights to navigating regulatory challenges, codes, procedures, and infrastructure requirements. City of Rosemead • WD90004.2022 KimleyoHorn - zd Project Experience Kimley-Horn has vast consecutive experience working with local and state agencies to develop their safety projects across California (demonstrated by the map below). Project manager Daryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP, has 10+ years of safety experience alone. The following pages describe the applicable experience of the proposed team along with client references to demonstrate the depth of familiar projects and quality of Kimley-Horn's services within California. COUNTYLRSPS, SSARP$ AND RSSAS O Nevada County RSSA O Placer County RSSA O Marin County RSSA O San Joaquin County SSARP 0 Calaveras County RSSA O Stanislaus County RSSA O Mono County SSARP O Monterey County RSSA p Ventura County LRSP m Imperial County RSSA m San Benito County LRSP ® Sutter County LRSP ® Orange County LRSP 1z ao� z VER�2'"li� (10 355RSPs a7 her states see_ CITYLRSPS, SSARPS, AND RSSAS ® Sunnyvale SSARP Q Goleta SSARP 0 Ventura SSARP 0 Santa Clarita SSARPAPSP m Lancaster SSARP/LRSP 0 Artesia LRSP m Anaheim LRSP 0 Eastvale SSARP ® La Ouinta SSARP City of Rosemead RSRD96004,2022 n G Perris LRSP p Imperial Beach LRSP Q Moreno Valley RSA / RSSA 0 Santa Cruz LRSP 0 Palm Desert LRSP G Citrus Heights LRSP 0 Roseville LRSP 0 Rocklin LRSP 0 South San Francisco LRSP 0 Rancho Cordova LRSP ® Indio LRSP 0 San Clemente LRSP 0 Costa Mesa LRSP 0 Seal Beach LRSP 0 Tracy LRSP ® Hollister LRSP 0 San Juan Bautista LRSP 0 Santa Maria LRSP 0 Lincoln LRSP 0 Simi Valley LRSP m Agoura Hills LRSP 0 West Hollywood LRSP 0 Chino LRSP 0 Menifee LRSP 0 Maywood LRSP m Compton LRSP 0 Cudahy LRSP Kimley>»Horn - 21 I City of Artesia, LRSP, Artesia, CA Kimley-Horn is working with the City of Artesia to develop an LRSP that uses local crash histories to identify trends and patterns within the City that will inform the development of a customized countermeasure toolbox. The plan will identify locations with higher crash rates, higher crash costs, and crash patterns to determine the physical roadway characteristics and driver attributes that contribute to the largest number and highest severity of crashes. , Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Manager; Jason Melchor, Project Engineer I City of Santa Clarita, SSAR/LRSP, Santa Clarita, CA Kimley-Horn developed a bicycle and pedestrian -focused SSAR for the City of Santa Clarita. The report focused on the locations and factors involved with bicycle and pedestrian crashes in the City and included a toolbox of countermeasures specifically tailored to improving bicycle and pedestrian safety. Kimley-Horn is also developing an LRSP focused on all roadway users. This plan uses a statistical evaluation of citywide crash data to identify emphasis areas that the City can focus on safety resources to reduce traffic injuries. The plan Includes a broader countermeasure toolbox of engineering, policy, program, and enforcement measures that the City can draw from. 11 Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Planner; Jean Fares, Project Manager; Kyle McGowan, Analyst I City of Anaheim, LRSP, Anaheim, CA The City of Anaheim received grant funding from Caltrans to conduct an LRSP to help the City identify and prioritize the most effective ways to improve traffic safety for all users, as part of a statewide goal to reduce traffic injuries and fatalities. The LRSP addresses safety through roadway improvements, measures to modify driver behavior, and improved emergency response. The LRSP has resulted in a set of data - driven recommendations, coupled with input from key stakeholders representing the four E's of safety included in the SHSP: engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services. Kimley-Horn is developing the LRSP for the City, which includes a customized toolbox of countermeasures that address the most common local challenges that align with statewide funding priorities. _, Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Planner; Jason Melchor, Project Manager I City of Eastvale, SSAR, Eastvale, CA Kimley-Horn provided engineering services to prepare an SSAR with a focus on addressing safety concerns for vehicular and pedestrian patterns associated with available collision data for the most recent three- or five-year period for which data is available. The goal was to provide the City with an overall understanding of available traffic data and safety analysis to identify areas with a high risk for collisions that will allow the City to plan for future safety improvements for the short, mid, and long-term. Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Manager; Jason Melchor, Project Engineer I City of Perris, LRSP, Perris, CA Kimley-Horn assisted the City of Perris with their LRSP to help prioritize the most effective ways to improve traffic safety for all users, as part of a statewide goal to reduce traffic injuries and fatalities. The LRSP addressed safety through roadway Improvements, measures to modify driver behavior, and improved emergency response. The LRSP resulted in a set of data -driven recommendations, coupled with input from key stakeholders representing the four E's of safety included in the SHSP; engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services. Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Manager; Jason Melchor, Project Engineer; Kyle McGowan, Analyst I City of Imperial, LRSP, Imperial Beach, CA Kimley-Horn provided traffic safety services to prepare an LRSP, including a citywide traffic collisions analysis identifying safety issues throughout the City's road network. The overall goal of this project was to provide the City with a detailed understanding of high-risk locations for collisions and identify engineering, education, and enforcement countermeasures that would allow the City to plan for future safety improvements for the immediate, mid-range, and long-term. This document provided guidance on selecting projects that will be well defined for future grant cycles. The project involved partnership with Crossroads and detailed crash data analysis to identify the number of collisions collision risk factors and rates, collision types and severity, crash rates, and various environmental variables. Rased on the findings for Imperial Beach having more frequent vulnerable user crashes (pedestrian, bicycle, motorcycle), infrastructure and non -infrastructure countermeasure recommendations to reduce the likelihood of future crashes were identified. The project also included public outreach and involvement to get feedback from residents. 1". Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Planner City of Rosemead • R9096004.2022 Kimley)»Horn - 22 I City of Palm Desert, LRSP, Palm Desert, CA Kimley-Han developed an LRSP for the City of Palm Desert that identified the trends and patterns for traffic collisions in the City and included a customized toolbox of countermeasures that address the most common local challenges that align with statewide funding priorities. Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Manager; Sean Fares, Principal -in -Charge; Kyle McGowan, Analyst I City of Santa Cruz, LRSP, Santa Cruz, CA Kimley-Horn is developing an LRSP for the City of Santa Cruz. The plan includes an evaluation of best safety practices and common safety challenges in the City. Our efforts included a field tour with key stakeholders while applying the necessary social distancing and safety measures. We accompanied the field investigation with successful virtual stakeholder meetings to gather additional stakeholder input. We have also included a customized toolbox of countermeasures that address the most common local challenges that align with statewide funding priorities. Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Manager I Caltrans, Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Implementation, Statewide, CA Kimley-Han is leading California's 2020 to 2024 SHSP Update and Implementation, a multi -agency collaborative effort. The SHSP's mission is to provide a safe and sustainable transportation system for all motorized and nonmotorized users on all public roads in California. Kimley-Nom's role is to assist with SHSP development, action plans, and compliance with federal requirements. The final SHSP will provide guidance about areas of emphasis, make recommendations for improvement, and note responsible agencies and individuals for each action. Kimley-Horn will support Caltrans with overseeing implementation for the next several years. This project has required extensive coordination with a steering committee, executive committee, and several working groups. These groups meet at regular intervals, and a rigid deliverable schedule is required to get meaningful input from each of these groups. Kimley-Horn has successfully worked with Caltrans staff to keep the project on schedule and on budget, while remaining versatile enough to respond to feedback that occasionally shifts project priorities and objectives. Project Team: Mike Colety, Project Manager I Caltrans, Safety Performance Management Target Setting Analysis, Statewide, CA Kimley-Horn was selected for this project to assist Caltrans in coordinating with stakeholders across the state—ncluding state agencies, MPOs, and tribal governments—to establish annual Safety Performance Measure Targets (SPMTs). Under the FAST Act, Caltrans is required to establish annual safety targets for each of the following five performance measures: t) number of fatalities, 2) rate of fatalities, 3) number of serious injuries, 4) rate of serious injuries, and 5) number of non -motorized fatalities and non -motorized serious injuries. The project successfully set a process to assess roadway safety to assist with the planning on how to most effectively allocate safety funding. This project included stakeholder coordination and the development of a safety performance measure target dashboard developed with Tableau software. Some aspects of this dashboard are now available within the California SHSP Crash dashboard at https://shsp.dot.ca.gov/. Project Team: Darryl dePencier, Project Planner; Mike Colety, Project Manager City of Rosemead RSRD9M.2022 KimleyoHorn • 23 Section 4. References We are proud of our working relationships with our clients, and much of our success over the last 55 years is directly related to our efforts to provide consistent, high-quality, and timely services. The following is a list of five references that received similar services from Kimley-Hom within the last five years. We invite you to contact our clients directly for comment on the quality of Kimley-Horn's services. City of Santa Clarita, LRSP/SSARP Mark Hunter, Transportation Planning Analyst 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, CA 91355 661.286.4042 a mhunter@santa-clarita.com Perris, LRSP Stuart McIG'bbin, Contract City Engineer 24 South D Street, Suite 100, Perris, CA 92570 951.435.2108 a stuart(frilakeconsultants.com City of Palm Desert „J._ Randy Bowman, Senior Project Manager 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 760.776.6493 a bowman@cityofpalmdesert.org City of Artesia ,r. Ernesto Sanchez, City Clerk 18747 Clarkdale Avenue, Artesia, CA 90701 562.865.6262 a esanchez@cityofartesia.us City of Santa Cruz Claire Gallogly, Transportation Planner 809 Center Street, Room 9, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 831.420.5030 a cgallogly@cityofsantacruz.com I've loved working with Kimley-Horn on this project. Darryl depencier is our project manager and has done a great job keeping the project moving on time and on budget. The rest of the team has also been great to work with. Their work is high quality, communication clear, and product is immediately usable. They went the extra mile in assisting us with two HSIP applications this cycle based on their draft report, and we would have been unable to take on the extra work of those without their help. I'd highly recommend their team. S41V17iCi&rz City of Rosemead • RSRD96004.2022 Kimley»Horn 24 Section S. Standard City Contract and Insurance Requirements Kimley-Horn has reviewed the Professional Services Agreement and can accept the terms contained therein with the following exceptions. 3.1 Scope of Services and Term. 3.1.1 General Scope of Services: Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, ani services, necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional [INSERT TYPE OF SER- VICES] services necessary for the Project, herein referred to a "Services". [...]. 3.5.6 Indemnity and Defense: b. Duty to Defend In the event the Agency, its officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers are made a parry to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding arising from the performance of the services encompassed by this agreement, and upon demand by Agency, Consultant shall defend the Agency at Consultant's cost or at Agency's option, to reimburse Agency for its costs of defense, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in the defense of such matters to the extent the matters arise from, relate to or are caused by Consultant's negligent acts, errors or omissions. Payment by Agency is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this provision. In the event of any dispute between Gonstiltant and Ageney, as to whathef liale lity arises froffl the sole ar act ve negligence of the Agency or Its off cefa, efflielayees, af agents, Gonsultant as solely or aetively negkjef* In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the design professional exceed the design professional's proportionate percentage of fault. 3.5.9 Time of Essence: Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. Consultant shall not have liability_ for any delays. expenses. losses, damages or be deemed in breach for liabilities which are caused by any factor outside of its reasonable control. including but not limited to natural disasters, epidemics, pandemics, quarantine restrictions, adverse weather, or acts of the City, third parties or governmental agencies Exhibit B — Insurance Requirements Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against negligent cts, errors or omissions of the consultant and "Covered Professional Services" I ... I City of Rosemead RSR096004.2022 Kimley)Morn - 25 Section 6. Addenda Acknowledgement We acknowledge receipt of this RFP and all addenda. City of Rosemead RSRD95004.2022 Kimley»)Horn 26 Fee Proposal Per the RFP, we have submitted our fee proposal in a separate sealed envelope. City of Rosemead RSR096004.2022 KimleyoHorn 27 -lot _ .h -ww 4 4 VF Darryl dePencier, AICP, LISP, RSP2B Darryl.DePencier@kimley-horn.com • 213.261.4039 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017 www.kimley-horn.com Kimlep>Horn 6 N t c Q 0 d `o Qo O N a C -E -E > W LL O o w a a I tl -E -E > i O O w n b n Q I tl b n N M d N O e -I N V O O W n 01 d Q M W m fl Ol O O G1 Y 1� m N N O W n rl I� N h W M Q O W M M Ol T W ti Ol O O � V O Q n M VI O N n 1� rl N m O b W Vl pl N 10 W O n d N N� Q N N M Q N rl N N M N Q m W Q N N o o d r N to N N a/1 N V1 V� 4/1 �A V1 Vf y� V� N H tI� N N V1 V1 V1 N N t/? N O W 0 1 00 � Q O o Q N O b b N c0 m O n N M W ry N n M N N b n m ^ W N V ti N O N N N ry ti N b Q d pj m H b d N W W Q d ti M d N N N W d d N pf '^ � � o r N M e Q � 1e1 a � N N N Q N N n b 'ri O N N N N N b N N n O ^ O m N N N m � W M M a p N W N N l0 Q N N N N N W 4O N N N N N Ifl N H N a W ti N W N N N W N •• K K q Q m J W _ D F � J a m o r O � O qc� v ? w o > c > o Z e d i c ii � o c n o. E L 0 3 " o Z o LL O .r m PNY .y « q N N q m m i r r rI Ir r I tl Rate Schedule Kimley>))Horn Rate Schedule Rates effective 3/1/2022 through 6/30/2023 Classification Daryl dePencier, Project Manager Jean Fares, Principal -in -Charge Mike Colety, QA/QC Sr. Professional 11 Sr. Professional) Billing Rate per Hour* $208.75 $343.90 $326.61 $273.67 $225.98 Professional $189.41 Analyst $138.99 *Rates will be escalated annually by 5% on July 151 beginning 7/l/2023 Other Direct Costs: Outside Printing/Reproduction, Delivery Services(USPS, Misc. Field Equipment/Supplies, and Travel Expenses will be billed at actual cost. Mileage will be billed at the Federal Rate. City of Rosemead • W090004.2022 Kimley)»Horn EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth here, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to City. Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO "insured contract" language will not be accepted. Business Auto Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or the exact equivalent. Limits are subject to review, but in no event to be less than $1,000,000 per accident. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non -owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described above. If Consultant or Consultant's employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. Workers Compensation on a state -approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) if used to meet limit requirements, shall provide coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Any such coverage provided under an umbrella liability policy shall include a drop down provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary but covered by the umbrella. Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured's liability is determined, not requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross- liability exclusion precluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to City for injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage provided is subject to approval of City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1 Million per occurrence. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against negligent acts, errors or omissions of the consultant and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. the Named Insured. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the state of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of A- or better and a minimum financial size VII. General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third -party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 (or otherwise consistent with the insurer's endorsement). Consultant also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent. 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at City option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice to City of any cancellation of coverage. A ten (10) day notice to City shall apply to nonpayment of premiums. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, or that any party will "endeavor" (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage (except Professional Liability and Workers' Compensation) required to be provided by Consultant or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 11. Consultant agrees not to self -insure or to use any self-insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self -insure its obligations to City. If Consultant's existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self-insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 12. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five days of the expiration of the coverages. 17. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features, or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all inclusive. 19. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20. The requirements in this Section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. Client#: 25320 KIMLHORN ACORD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 05/0612022 CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, s/oslzozz THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer any rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER NAMEp T Jerry Noyola Greyling Ins. Brokerage/EPIC PHONE -FAX AIC NP,, Ext)_ _220.7699 770 _ _ J_ C, Nop______ _— 3780 Mansell Road, Suite 370 ElaAIL er no ola re Iln ADDRESS. j----ry__y Cog Y g•com Alpharetta, GA 30022 INSURERS) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC r CLAIMS -MADE `XI OCCUR INSURER A: National Union Fire Ins. Co. 19445 INSURED INSURER B :Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) 19489 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 23841 INSURER C: P 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600 Lloyds of London 085202 INSURER D: Y Raleigh, NC 27601 INSURER E INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 22-23 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSRIAODLSUBR. LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE WER WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF m MMD POLICY E%P MMIDD/YVYY '', LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERALLIABILITY IGL5268169 4/01/2022 04/01/2023 EACHOCCURRENCE $1,000,000 CLAIMS -MADE `XI OCCUR pMVIEWED $500,000 MED E%P (Myope person).- E25 OOO _ X Contractual Llab _ _' PERSONALBAOVINJURY E1,000 OOO i, GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 GEN L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY [X JET a LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG 82,000,000 $ OTHER: A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY, iCA4489663 4/01/2022 04/01/202$EeacolEEDtSINGLE LIMIT 2,000,000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ X ANY AUTO ''. BODILY INJURY (Per accitlent) $ OWNEDSCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ X HIRED4XANUCnWNNE0y AUTOS ONLY (Per amdent $ X UMBRELLALOCCUR 103127930 4/01/2022 04/01/2023 EACH OCCURRENCE S5000000X II AGGREGATE s5,000,000 EXCESS LIAB_ CLAIMS -MADE' DED X RETENTION$10000 7 S c WORKERS COMPENSATION WC015893685 (AOS) 4/07/2022 0410112023 X PER OTH- C AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECl1TIVEYIN WC015893686(CA) 4/01/202204101/2023 E.L. EACHAcc10ENT s1000000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In IN NIA'- E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $1 000 000 El DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 If yes, descriae under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below D Professional Liab B0146LDUSA2204949 4101/2022 04/01/2023,' Per Claim $2,000,000 Aggregate $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space Is required) Re: Planning & Engineering Services for the Preparation of Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP); Jean Fares. The City , its officials, employees & agents are named as Additional Insureds with respects to General Liability where required by written contract. The above referenced liability policies with the exception of workers compensation and professional liability are primary & non-contributory where required by written contract. Waiver of Subrogation in favor of Additional Insured(s) where required by written contract & (See Attached Descriptions) Cit of Rd SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE Y Rosemead THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 8838 E. Valley Boulevard ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Rosemead, CA 91770 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE © 1988.2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rignts reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) 1 of 2 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD #S3255319/M3180887 JN0Y1 DESCRIPTIONS (Continued from Page 1) 1 allowed by law. Should any of the above described policies be cancelled by the issuing insurer before the expiration date thereof, 30 days' written notice (except 10 days for nonpayment of premium) will be provided to the Certificate Holder. SAGITTA 25.3 (2016/03) 2 of 2 #53255319/M3180887 POLICY NUMBER: GL5268169 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 12 19 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s) Location(s) Of Covered Operations ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHOM YOU PER THE CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT. BECOME OBLIGATED TO INCLUDE AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED AS A RESULT OF ANY CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT YOU HAVE ENTERED INTO. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II 6 Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", .'property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions; or 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) designated above. However: 1. The insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law; and 2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded to such additional insured will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured. B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclusions apply: This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after: 1. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. CG 20 10 12 19 0 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 2 C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following is added to Section III — Limits Of Insurance: If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance: 1. Required by the contract or agreement; or 2. Available under the applicable limits of insurance; whichever is less. This endorsement shall not increase the applicable limits of insurance. Page 2 of 2 0 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 CG 20 10 12 19 POLICY NUMBER: GL5268169 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 37 12 19 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Or anization(s) Location And Description Of Completed Operations ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION PER THE CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT. WHOM YOU BECOME OBLIGATED TO INCLUDE AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED AS A RESULT OF ANY CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT YOU HAVE ENTERED INTO. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organizations) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused, in whole or in part, by "your work" at the location designated and described in the Schedule of this endorsement performed for that additional insured and included in the "products -completed operations hazard". However: 1. The insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law; and 2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded to such additional insured will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured. B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following is added to Section III — Limits Of Insurance: If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance: 1. Required by the contract or agreement; or 2. Available under the applicable limits of insurance; whichever is less. This endorsement shall not increase the applicable limits of insurance. CG 20 37 12 19 0 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 1