• Metadata
  • Annotations
Entry Properties
Modified
 1/5/2023 7:47:32 PM
Created
 1/5/2023 8:03:35 PM
Path
 \PUBLIC\General Documents\City Clerk\Agendas\2023\City Council\01-10-2023\CC - Item 3A - Public Hearing - Attachment H with Appendices
Template
City Clerk
CC - Item 3A - Public Hearing - Attachment H with Appendices Attachment H Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration with Mitigation Monitoring Program (Appendices included in USB Drive) Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration MISSION VILLAS RESIDENTIAL PROJECT FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION December 2022 Lead Agency: City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Blvd Rosemead, CA 91770 Contact Person and Phone Number: Annie Lao, (626) 569-2144 Project Applicant: Borstein Enterprises 8951 Research Drive Irvine, CA 92618 2355 Main Street, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92614 Attachment "H" Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration i This page intentionally left blank. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ii Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 PROJECT SETTING ............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 EXISTING PROJECT SITE ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS .................................................................. 3 2.4 SURROUNDING LAND USE, GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS ................................. 3 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 15 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ......................................................................................... 19 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ....................................................................... 19 4.2 DETERMINATION ......................................................................................................................................... 20 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS ....................................................................................... 22 1. AESTHETICS ........................................................................................................................................................ 22 2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 27 3. AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................. 37 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 42 6. ENERGY .............................................................................................................................................................. 46 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ................................................................................................................................... 51 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ................................................................................................................... 57 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................................................................... 61 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY........................................................................................................ 66 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING ......................................................................................................................... 72 12. MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 75 13. NOISE ............................................................................................................................................................... 76 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 90 15. PUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................ 92 16. RECREATION ................................................................................................................................................... 96 17. TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................................................................ 98 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 103 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................. 106 20. WILDFIRES ..................................................................................................................................................... 112 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ......................................................................................... 114 5 GENERAL REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 118 6 DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS ............................................................ 119 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration iii Figures Figure 1: Regional Location ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2: Local Vicinity ............................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 3: Aerial View .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 4a: Site Photos .......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 4b: Site Photos .......................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 5: Conceptual Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 6a: Plan 1 Exterior Elevations Spanish Colonial ................................................................................................................ 21 Figure 6b: Plan 1 Exterior Elevations Hacienda ............................................................................................................................ 23 Figure 6c: Plan 2 Exterior Elevations Spanish Colonial ................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 6d: Plan 2 Exterior Elevations Hacienda ............................................................................................................................ 27 Figure 6e: Duplex Exterior Elevations Spanish Colonial ............................................................................................................... 29 Figure 6f: Duplex Exterior Elevations Hacienda ............................................................................................................................ 31 Figure 7: Conceptual Landscape Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 33 Figure 8: Wall and Fence Plan .......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Figure 9: Noise Measurement Locations ........................................................................................................................................... 99 Tables Table AQ-1: SCAQMD Regional Daily Emissions Thresholds ...................................................................................................... 31 Table AQ-2: Regional Construction Emissions Summary ............................................................................................................... 32 Table AQ-3: Summary of Regional Operational Emissions ......................................................................................................... 33 Table AQ-4: Localized Construction Emissions ................................................................................................................................ 33 Table Bio-1: Potentially Occurring Plant Species .......................................................................................................................... 38 Table Bio-2: Potentially Occurring Animal Species ....................................................................................................................... 38 Table N-1: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels ...................................................................................................... 77 Table N-2: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels ...................................................................................................... 79 Table N-3: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels ...................................................................................................... 79 Table N-4: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis ..................................................................................... 79 Table N-5: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria .................................................................................................................... 79 Table N-6: Summary of 24-Hour Ambient Noise Level Measurements .................................................................................... 81 Table N-7: Construction Activity Noise Levels at 50 Feet ............................................................................................................ 85 Table N-8: Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptors ............................................................................... 86 Table N-9: Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment at 25 Feet ........................................................................... 87 Table PS-1: School Capacity and Project Generated Students ................................................................................................. 94 Table TR-1: Proposed Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................ 100 Table UT-1: District Supply Reliability – Average, Single Dry Year, & Multiple Dry Years ............................................. 108 Appendix A Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Analysis B General Biological Assessment C D E F G H I J K L Cultural Resources Assessment Preliminary Geotechincal Investigation Paleontological Assessment Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Remedial Excavation Completion Report Preliminary Hydrology Study Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan (LID) Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis Sewer Will Serve Letter M Sewer Area Study N MMRP Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") has been prepared in accordance with the following: •California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.); and •California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (State CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15000 et seq.). Pursuant to CEQA, this IS/MND has been prepared to analyze the potential for significant impacts on the environment resulting from implementation of the proposed Project. As required by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, this Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead Agency, the City of Rosemead, in consultation with other jurisdictional agencies, to determine if a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the Project. This IS/MND informs City of Rosemead decision-makers, affected agencies, and the public of potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Project. A “significant effect” or “significant impact” on the environment means “a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the Project” (Guidelines §15382). As such, the IS/MND’s intent is to adhere to the following CEQA principles: •Provide meaningful early evaluation of site planning constraints, service and infrastructure requirements, and other local and regional environmental considerations. (Pub. Res. Code §21003.1) •Encourage the applicant to incorporate environmental considerations into Project conceptualization, design, and planning at the earliest feasible time. (State CEQA Guidelines §15004[b][3]) •Specify mitigation measures for reasonably foreseeable significant environmental effects and commit Rosemead and the applicant to future measures containing performance standards to ensure their adequacy when detailed development plans and applications are submitted. (State CEQA Guidelines §15126.4) Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs) Throughout the impact analysis in this Initial Study, reference is made to requirements that are applied to all development on the basis of federal, state, or local law, and Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies currently in place which effectively reduce environmental impacts. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies are collectively identified in this document as PPPs. Where applicable, PPPs are listed to show their effect in reducing potential environmental impacts. Where the application of these measures does not reduce an impact to below a level of significance, a Project-specific mitigation measure is introduced. Chapter 1. Public Review MND Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 1.2 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION This IS/MND includes the flowing sections: Section 1.0 Introduction Provides information about CEQA and its requirements for environmental review and explains that an Initial Study/MND was prepared by the City of Rosemead to evaluate the proposed Project’s potential to impact the physical environment. Section 2.0 Project Setting Provides information about the proposed Project’s location. Section 3.0 Project Description Includes a description of the proposed Project’s physical features and construction and operational characteristics. Also includes a list of discretionary approvals that would be required by the proposed Project. Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist Includes the Environmental Checklist and evaluates the proposed Project’s potential to result in significant adverse effects to the physical environment. Section 5.0 General References Includes a list of general reference materials relied on in the IS/MND. Each subtopic in Section 4.0 also contains a more specific list of reference materials relied on in the topical analysis. Section 6.0 Document Preparers and Contributors Includes the persons that prepared this IS/MND. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 2 PROJECT SETTING 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION The 3.435-acre Project site is located in the northwest portion of the City of Rosemead at 8601 Mission Drive. The site is located within Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 12 West as shown on the El Monte, California 7.5-minute U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) topographic maps. The regional location of the Project site is shown in Figure 1, Regional Location. The Project site consists of three parcels, identified by the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. The Project site is bounded by Mission Drive to the south, a vacant parcel and a nursery to the west, and residential uses to the east and north. Regional access to the Project site is provided by Interstate 10 (I-10) and Interstate State Route 19 (SR-19). Local access to the Project site is provided by Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue. The Project vicinity and surrounding area is shown in Figure 2, Local Vicinity. 2.2 EXISTING PROJECT SITE The Project site is comprised of three parcels encompassing approximately 3.435 gross acres (3.378 net acres) of land. The site is generally flat with elevations ranging from approximately 357 to 363 feet above mean sea level. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped with some groundcover and onsite improvements. Portions of concrete driveways exist at the west and south of the site. The perimeters of the site are bound by chain-link fencing, masonry block walls, and plastic fencing. There are palm trees present along the northwest property boundary. Additionally, overhead power lines exist along the southwest boundary of the site. Existing conditions of the Project site and adjacent uses are shown in Figure 3, Aerial View and Figure 4, Site Photos. 2.3 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential and a zoning designation of R-1 Single Family Residential. The Low Density Residential designation is characterized by low-density residential neighborhoods consisting primarily of detached single- family dwellings on individual lots. The maximum permitted density within the Low Density Residential designation is 7.0 dwelling units per acre. The R-1 zoning district identifies areas characterized by single-family dwellings. 2.4 SURROUNDING LAND USE, GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS The Project site is located within a developed, urbanized area within the City of Rosemead as described below: Table 1: Surrounding Existing Land Use and Zoning Designations Existing Land Use General Plan Designation Zoning Designation North Single Family Residences Low Density Residential R-1- Single Family Residential East Single Family Residences Low Density Residential R-1- Single Family Residential South Mission Drive followed by Single Family Residences Low Density Residential R-1- Single Family Residential Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 West Open space Public Facilities O-S - Open Space Figure 18601 Mission Drive City of Rosemead Regional Location Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 This page intentionally left blank. Local Vicinity Figure 28601 Mission Drive City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 8 This page intentionally left blank. Aerial View Figure 38601 Mission Drive City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 This page intentionally left blank. Site Photos Figure 4a8601 Mission Drive City of Rosemead View from the west side of the site off of Walnut Grove Ave. Southwest corner of site from the intersecton of Walnut Grove Ave and Mission Dr. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 12 This page intentionally left blank. Site Photos Figure 4b8601 Mission Drive City of Rosemead Southeast corner of site from Mission Dr. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 14 This page intentionally left blank. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 15 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed Project would develop the approximately 3.435-acre Project site with 37 two-story dwelling units. The residential community would include parking, landscaping, common areas, and associated infrastructure. The Project also requires approval of a General Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential; a zone change from R-1 Single Family Residential to P-D Planned Development; and a tentative parcel map. Figure 5, Conceptual Site Plan illustrated the Project as proposed. 3.2 PROJECT FEATURES Development Summary The proposed Project would construct 37 two-story dwelling units on the 3.37-acre parcel, which would result in a density of 11 units per acre. The units would range in size from 1,546 square feet (SF) to 2,553 SF and include two different single-family dwelling (SFD) plan options and two different duplex plan options. Lots 14-32 would include backyard patios. The Project would include 4 affordable duplex units. Table 2 provides a summary of the proposed residential plans. Table 2: Proposed Residence Plan Options Unit Type Square Footage Number of Bedrooms Number of Units SFD Plan 1 2,351 4 14 SFD Plan 2 2,553 4 15 Duplex Plan 1 1,546 3 4 Duplex Plan 2 1,868 4 4 Total --- 37 Architectural Design The proposed two-story residences would be designed with traditional architectural elements, multi- level rooflines, and an earth tone color scheme. The residences would incorporate stucco finishes, stone accents, decorative ceramic tiles, tiled roofs, painted shutters and decorative windows and doors in the exterior design. The tallest roofline of the proposed residences would be approximately 28 feet in height. Figures 6a-f, Exterior Elevations, illustrates the proposed exterior elevations. Recreation and Open Space The Project would include approximately 17,298 SF of common open space that would be provided in a central recreational area on the site. The central community open space area would include a fire pit, seating, and an artificial turf area. Each residential unit would have a minimum of 390 SF of private open space. Lighting Outdoor lighting included as part of future development on the Project site would be typical of residential uses and would consist of wall-mounted lighting as well as pole-mounted lights along the proposed internal roadways. Nighttime lighting would be used as accent/security lighting in the recreation areas. All of the Project’s outdoor lighting would be directed downward and shielded to Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 16 minimize offsite spill. The location of all exterior lighting would comply with lighting standards established in the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 17.88). Access and Circulation Access to the Project site would be provided via one 40-foot-wide driveway on Mission Drive. A 20-foot-wide drive aisle would provide internal circulation throughout the Project site and access to garages and onsite parking. Pedestrian sidewalks would be installed to circulate the site and connect to the existing right of way along Mission Drive. Parking The Project would include a total of 99 automobile parking spaces. Each residential unit includes an attached, covered 2 car garage (74 spaces). An additional 25 uncovered guest parking spaces and 2 bicycle parking spaces are proposed throughout the Project site. Landscaping Landscaping proposed as part of the Project would consist of ornamental trees, shrubs, and groundcovers throughout the common areas of the development, such as along roadways, common walls, and the recreation areas. In addition, street trees would be installed along the proposed sidewalks throughout the Project site. The roadway entrance to the Project site would have a landscaped median and decorative landscaping to enhance the entrance to the residential neighborhood. Figure 7, Conceptual Landscape Plan, illustrates the proposed landscaping. The landscape plan would be consistent with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Requirements (Chapter 13.08). Fences and Walls The Project proposes to construct a 6-foot-high split-face concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall along the perimeter of the site. The Project also proposes to construct 6-foot-high vinyl privacy fencing in between each residential unit. The Project also proposes to construct 5-foot-high metal fences on the east and west sides of the Project’s entrance. Figure 8, Wall and Fence Plan, illustrates the proposed walls and fences. Infrastructure Improvements Water The Project would install new onsite potable water lines that would connect to existing 6-inch water lines in Mission Drive. Sewer The Project would also construct onsite sewer lines that would connect to the existing 8-inch sewer line in Mission Drive. Drainage The Project would install new storm drain lines throughout the site. Additionally, the Project would install catch basins throughout the site and an underground detention system in the southern portion of the site to collect stormwater. Additionally, multiple planter boxes would be installed for further stormwater infiltration. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 17 3.3 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING The Project proposes a General Plan amendment to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. The Medium Density Residential designation allows for densities of up to 12 units per acre. The Project also proposes a zone change from R-1 Single Family Residential to P-D Planned Development. The P-D zone allows for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses subject to regulations set forth in Section 17.24 of the Municipal Code. A zone change to a P-D zone requires Planned Development Review, with approval of a Precise Development Plan by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3.4 CONSTRUCTION Construction activities for the Project would occur over two phases lasting approximately 11 months and in the following stages: (1) grading and excavation; (2) site preparation, which includes clearing any remaining infrastructure, utilities, and trenching for the new utilities and services; (3) building construction; and (4) landscape installation, paving, and application of architectural coatings. Grading would begin in March 2023 and construction would end in June 2024. The Project would open in October 2024. Construction activities would be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., excluding Sundays and holidays, as pursuant to the City’s requirements for noise control (Chapter 8.36) 3.5 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS AND PERMITS The following discretionary approvals and permits are anticipated from the City of Rosemead to be necessary for implementation of the proposed Project: • Tentative Tract Map • Zone Change • General Plan Amendment • Planned Development Review, approval of Precise Development Plan Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 18 This page intentionally left blank 8601 Mission DriveCity of RosemeadFigure 5Conceptual Site Plan1 2345 6 7 8MAIL 9 10 1112 13 20 21 22 23 24 251415 16 17 18 1938.29'42.62'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'33.48'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'38.35'76.50' 86.00' 76.62' 86.14'S89°55 '4 0"W 1 74 .1 1' S00°56'10"E 542.70' N00°19'33"W 254.20' N28°55'42" E 3 8 9 . 3 7 'S64°18'32"E 250.37' S20°14'36"W 1 6 9 . 6 3 'N89°08 '21 "E 8 6. 93 ' 20.0 14.0 8.00 15.00 15.30 17.2313.2313.76 20.0024.00 13.00 20.00 14.01 8.00 20.00 20.73 18.00 10.00 11.50 30.00 9.0 18.0 9.0 18.08.0020.00 5TYP5TYP 19.15 6.0 20.00 38.0013.0013.0020.00 24.0 0 20.0 0TYP12.1710.1714.6911.0020.00 3TYP 3TYP 21.0 10.08.013.0512.03MM SBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19 -52D SBEPAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTSSO CALIF ED ISON CONO SITUSAPN: 5389-005-800QUYEN Y TO4629 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389 -009 -042 JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047 MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048 DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049 JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043 MIKE B TO/TR ITIA TO4623 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389 -009 -041WILLIAM J STONECYPHER JR4617 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-040CARLOS VILLAGRAN /KAREN VIL LAGRAN4613 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-039FENGYI J S ITU/TRACY F SITU4607 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009 -038NGO & BANH FAMILY TRUSTNGO ALEXANDER D TR4603 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-037 JASON SAM /FRAUST INA SAM4549 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-036 LA IRD ANDERSON/DONNA B ANDERSON4545 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-035BRYANT M TANG4539 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-034LENK TRUSTLENK JANET M TR4535 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389 -009-033KOKICHI NAKAZAWA /SUMIE NAKAZAWA4529 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-032SANDY H WU8639 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-026DE HONG8637 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-028DUBOIS FAMILY TRUSTDUBOIS WAYNE A &DOROTHY A TRS8635 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-02740 40 80 32 32 8 8 6.0 16.0 DU5DU9DU7DU10DU11DU12DU13DU14DU15DU16DU17DU20DU21DU22DU23DU32DU33DU31DU34DU35DU24DU25DU26DU27DU28DU29DU30DU18DU19DU1DU2DU3DU6DU4DU8DU36DU37L01 L02 L03TYP L05 L06 L07TYP L08TYP L04TYPC01C02 C02 C02 L05 P01TYP W01TYP A0.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L ICA N TP RO JECTDRAW INGSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESN500100150ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN &PROJECT STATISTICSARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANSFDPLAN 12,351 sfSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDASFDPLAN 22,553 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 11,546 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 21,868 sfVICINITY MAPPROJECT SUMMARY:·OWNER / APPLICANT:BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC.11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025·CONTACT:ERIK PFAHLERerik@borsteinenterprises.com310.582.1991 x203·APN:5389-009-029, 030, 031·ZONING:··CURRENT:R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:P-D·GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION··EXISTING:LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL·PROJECT SIZE:··GROSS SF:3.435 AC (149,929 SF)··NET SF:3.378 AC (147,146 SF)·LOT SIZE / F.A.R. / LOT COVERAGE:··LOT 1 (DU 9-37) : 127,151 SF / 67.1% / 43.0%··LOT 2 (DU 4):3,089 SF / 76.8% / 39.5%··LOT 3 (DU 3):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 4 (DU 2):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 5 (DU 1):2,809 SF / 84.5% / 43.5%··LOT 6 (DU 5):3,095 SF / 76.7% / 39.5%··LOT 7 (DU 6):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 8 (DU 7):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 9 (DU 8):2,499 SF / 95.0% / 48.9%·TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNITS:37 DU··SFD PLAN 1:14 DU··SFD PLAN 2:15 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 1:4 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 2:4 DU·DENSITY:10.95 DU/AC• OPEN SPACE AREA: 17,298 SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS·PARKING:··GARAGE:74 SPACES··GUEST:25 SPACES··BICYCLE:2 SPACES·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE VB·OCCUPANCY:R-3 SFD/DUPLEX (CRC)·PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:VARIES: MIN. 390 SF / DU ACHIEVED·SCHOOL DISTRICT:ROSEMEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT3907 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD #220ROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.312.2900·ELECTRICAL SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONP.O. BOX 6400RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729800.655.4555·GAS SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYP.O. BOX CMONTEREY PARK, CA 91756800.427.2200·WATER SERVICE:CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY8657 GRAND AVENUEROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.614.2500REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.SITE PLAN LEGENDFIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESSFIRE HYDRANT (3 PROPOSED)BICYCLE RACK (2 SPACES)CENTRAL COMMON OPEN SPACE1,644 TOT. SF / 1 .1% W ITH IN PROJECT LIM ITSSURFACING : TURFOTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE15,654 TOT . SF / 10 .6% WITH IN PROJECT L IM ITSSURFACING : COMMON AREA LANDSCAP INGTOTAL OPEN SPACE17,298 TOT . SF / 11 .8% WITH IN PROJECT L IM ITSREAR YARD AREAS34,359 TOT . SF / 23 .4% WITH IN PROJECT L IM ITSCITY PARKWAY LANDSCAPE489 TOT. SF / 0.3 % W ITH IN PROJECT LIM ITSSURFACING : PARKWAY LANDSCAP INGTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA51,470 TOT . SF / 34 .5% WITH IN PROJECT L IM ITSR.O.W. HARDSCAPE1,383 TOT. SF / 0 .9% W ITH IN PROJECT LIM ITSSURFACING : NATURAL COLORED CONCRETEDRIVE AISLE HARDSCAPE30,810 TOT . SF / 20 .9% OF PROJECTSURFACING : NATURAL COLORED CONCRETEHARDSCAPE (SIDEWALKS)9,578 TOT. SF / 6 .5% WITH IN PROJECT L IM ITSSURFACING : NATURAL COLORED CONCRETETOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA40,388 TOT . SF / 27 .1% WITH IN PROJECT L IM ITS6ft HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM WALL w/ 4inHIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM CAPPARKING STALLS TO BE STRIPED PERCITY MUN ICIPAL CODE SECT ION17.112.111HTRASH COLLECTION BIN LOCATION PERREPUBLIC SERVICES WILL SERVELETTERC01C02L01L02L03L04L05L06L07L08L09P01W01DWELLING UNIT LEGENDSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDA12 34 56 78MAIL 9 101112132021 22 23242514151617181938.29'42.62'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'33.48'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'38.35'76.50'86.00'76.62'86.14'S89°55'40"W 174.11'S00°56'10"E 542.70'N00°19'33"W 254.20'N28°55'42"E 389.37'S64°18'32"E 250.37'S20°14'36"W 169.63'N89°08'21"E 86.93'20.014.0 8.0015.0015.3017.2313.2313.7620.0024.0013.0020.0014.01 8.0020.00 20.7318.0010.00 11.5030.00 9.018.09.018.08.0020.005TYP5TYP 19.156.0 20.00 38.0013.0013.0020.0024.00 20.00TYP12.1710.1714.6911.0020.00 3TYP3TYP21.0 10.08.013.0512.03MMSBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19-52D SBEPAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTSSO CALIF EDISON CONO SITUSAPN: 5389-005-800QUYEN Y TO4629 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-042JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043MIKE B TO/TRITIA TO4623 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-041WILLIAM J STONECYPHER JR4617 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-040CARLOS VILLAGRAN/KAREN VILLAGRAN4613 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-039FENGYI J SITU/TRACY F SITU4607 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-038NGO & BANH FAMILY TRUSTNGO ALEXANDER D TR4603 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-037JASON SAM/FRAUSTINA SAM4549 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-036LAIRD ANDERSON/DONNA B ANDERSON4545 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-035BRYANT M TANG4539 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-034LENK TRUSTLENK JANET M TR4535 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-033KOKICHI NAKAZAWA/SUMIE NAKAZAWA4529 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-032SANDY H WU8639 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-026DE HONG8637 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-028DUBOIS FAMILY TRUSTDUBOIS WAYNE A &DOROTHY A TRS8635 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-0274040803232886.016.0 DU5DU9DU7DU10DU11DU12DU13DU14DU15DU16DU17DU20DU21DU22DU23DU32DU33DU31DU34DU35DU24DU25DU26DU27DU28DU29DU30DU18DU19DU1DU2DU3DU6DU4DU8DU36DU37L01 L02L03TYPL05L06 L07TYPL08TYP L04TYPC01C02C02 C02L05P01TYPW01TYP A0.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L ICA N TP RO JECTDRAW INGSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESN500100150ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN &PROJECT STATISTICSARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANSFDPLAN 12,351 sfSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDASFDPLAN 22,553 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 11,546 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 21,868 sfVICINITY MAPPROJECT SUMMARY:·OWNER / APPLICANT:BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC.11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025·CONTACT:ERIK PFAHLERerik@borsteinenterprises.com310.582.1991 x203·APN:5389-009-029, 030, 031·ZONING:··CURRENT:R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:P-D·GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION··EXISTING:LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL·PROJECT SIZE:··GROSS SF:3.435 AC (149,929 SF)··NET SF:3.378 AC (147,146 SF)·LOT SIZE / F.A.R. / LOT COVERAGE:··LOT 1 (DU 9-37) : 127,151 SF / 67.1% / 43.0%··LOT 2 (DU 4):3,089 SF / 76.8% / 39.5%··LOT 3 (DU 3):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 4 (DU 2):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 5 (DU 1):2,809 SF / 84.5% / 43.5%··LOT 6 (DU 5):3,095 SF / 76.7% / 39.5%··LOT 7 (DU 6):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 8 (DU 7):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 9 (DU 8):2,499 SF / 95.0% / 48.9%·TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNITS:37 DU··SFD PLAN 1:14 DU··SFD PLAN 2:15 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 1:4 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 2:4 DU·DENSITY:10.95 DU/AC• OPEN SPACE AREA: 17,298 SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS·PARKING:··GARAGE:74 SPACES··GUEST:25 SPACES··BICYCLE:2 SPACES·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE VB·OCCUPANCY:R-3 SFD/DUPLEX (CRC)·PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:VARIES: MIN. 390 SF / DU ACHIEVED·SCHOOL DISTRICT:ROSEMEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT3907 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD #220ROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.312.2900·ELECTRICAL SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONP.O. BOX 6400RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729800.655.4555·GAS SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYP.O. BOX CMONTEREY PARK, CA 91756800.427.2200·WATER SERVICE:CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY8657 GRAND AVENUEROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.614.2500REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.SITE PLAN LEGENDFIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESSFIRE HYDRANT (3 PROPOSED)BICYCLE RACK (2 SPACES)CENTRAL COMMON OPEN SPACE1,644 TOT. SF / 1.1% W ITH IN PROJECT L IMITSSURFACING: TURFOTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE15,654 TOT. SF / 10.6% WITHIN PROJECT LIM ITSSURFACING: COMMON AREA LANDSCAP INGTOTAL OPEN SPACE17,298 TOT. SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIM ITSREAR YARD AREAS34,359 TOT . SF / 23.4% WITHIN PROJECT LIM ITSCITY PARKWAY LANDSCAPE489 TOT. SF / 0.3 % WITH IN PROJECT LIM ITSSURFACING: PARKWAY LANDSCAP INGTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA51,470 TOT . SF / 34.5% WITHIN PROJECT LIM ITSR.O.W. HARDSCAPE1,383 TOT. SF / 0.9% W ITH IN PROJECT L IMITSSURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETEDRIVE AISLE HARDSCAPE30,810 TOT . SF / 20.9% OF PROJECTSURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETEHARDSCAPE (SIDEWALKS)9,578 TOT. SF / 6.5% W ITHIN PROJECT L IMITSSURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETETOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA40,388 TOT . SF / 27.1% WITHIN PROJECT LIM ITS6ft HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM WALL w/ 4inHIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM CAPPARKING STALLS TO BE STRIPED PERCITY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION17.112.111HTRASH COLLECTION BIN LOCATION PERREPUBLIC SERVICES WILL SERVELETTERC01C02L01L02L03L04L05L06L07L08L09P01W01DWELLING UNIT LEGENDSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDA1 23 456 78 MAIL 9 10111213 20 21 22 23 24 2514151617181938.29'42.62'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'33.48'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'38.35'76.50'86.00'76.62'86.14' S89 °55 '4 0"W 174 .1 1' S00°56'10"E 542.70' N00°19'33"W 254.20'N28°55'42"E 389.37'S64°18'32"E 250.37'S20°14'36"W 1 6 9 . 6 3 'N89° 08 '21 "E 86 .9 3' 20.014.0 8.00 15.00 15. 30 17.2313.2313.76 20.0024.0013.0 0 20.00 14.01 8.00 20.00 20.7318.0010.00 11.5030.00 9.0 18.0 9.018.08.0020.00 5TYP5TYP 19.15 6.0 20.00 38.0013.0013.0020.0024.00 20.00TYP12.1710.1714.6911.0020.00 3TYP3TYP21.0 10.08.013.0512.03MMSBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19-52D SBEPAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTSSO CALIF EDISON CONO SITUSAPN: 5389-005-800QUYEN Y TO4629 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389 -009-042 JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047 MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048 DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049 JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043 MIKE B TO/TRIT IA TO4623 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-041WILLIAM J STONECYPHER JR4617 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-040CARLOS VILLAGRAN/KAREN VILLAGRAN4613 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-039FENGYI J SITU/TRACY F SITU4607 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389 -009-038NGO & BANH FAMILY TRUSTNGO ALEXANDER D TR4603 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-037JASON SAM/FRAUSTINA SAM4549 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-036LAIRD ANDERSON /DONNA B ANDERSON4545 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389 -009-035BRYANT M TANG4539 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-034LENK TRUSTLENK JANET M TR4535 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-033KOKICHI NAKAZAWA/SUMIE NAKAZAWA4529 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-032SANDY H WU8639 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-026DE HONG8637 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-028DUBOIS FAMILY TRUSTDUBOIS WAYNE A &DOROTHY A TRS8635 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-0274040803232 88 6.016.0 DU5DU9DU7DU10DU11DU12DU13DU14DU15DU16DU17DU20DU21DU22DU23DU32DU33DU31DU34DU35DU24DU25DU26DU27DU28DU29DU30DU18DU19DU1DU2DU3DU6DU4DU8DU36DU37L01L02 L03TYPL05L06 L07TYP L08TYP L04TYPC01C02C02 C02L05P01TYPW01TYP A0.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L ICA N TP RO JECTDRAW INGSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESN500100150ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN &PROJECT STATISTICSARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANSFDPLAN 12,351 sfSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDASFDPLAN 22,553 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 11,546 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 21,868 sfVICINITY MAPPROJECT SUMMARY:·OWNER / APPLICANT:BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC.11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025·CONTACT:ERIK PFAHLERerik@borsteinenterprises.com310.582.1991 x203·APN:5389-009-029, 030, 031·ZONING:··CURRENT:R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:P-D·GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION··EXISTING:LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL·PROJECT SIZE:··GROSS SF:3.435 AC (149,929 SF)··NET SF:3.378 AC (147,146 SF)·LOT SIZE / F.A.R. / LOT COVERAGE:··LOT 1 (DU 9-37) : 127,151 SF / 67.1% / 43.0%··LOT 2 (DU 4):3,089 SF / 76.8% / 39.5%··LOT 3 (DU 3):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 4 (DU 2):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 5 (DU 1):2,809 SF / 84.5% / 43.5%··LOT 6 (DU 5):3,095 SF / 76.7% / 39.5%··LOT 7 (DU 6):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 8 (DU 7):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 9 (DU 8):2,499 SF / 95.0% / 48.9%·TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNITS:37 DU··SFD PLAN 1:14 DU··SFD PLAN 2:15 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 1:4 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 2:4 DU·DENSITY:10.95 DU/AC• OPEN SPACE AREA: 17,298 SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS·PARKING:··GARAGE:74 SPACES··GUEST:25 SPACES··BICYCLE:2 SPACES·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE VB·OCCUPANCY:R-3 SFD/DUPLEX (CRC)·PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:VARIES: MIN. 390 SF / DU ACHIEVED·SCHOOL DISTRICT:ROSEMEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT3907 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD #220ROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.312.2900·ELECTRICAL SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONP.O. BOX 6400RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729800.655.4555·GAS SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYP.O. BOX CMONTEREY PARK, CA 91756800.427.2200·WATER SERVICE:CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY8657 GRAND AVENUEROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.614.2500REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.SITE PLAN LEGENDFIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESSFIRE HYDRANT (3 PROPOSED)BICYCLE RACK (2 SPACES)CENTRAL COMMON OPEN SPACE1,644 TOT. SF / 1 .1% W ITH IN PROJECT L IMITSSURFACING: TURFOTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE15,654 TOT. SF / 10.6% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITSSURFACING: COMMON AREA LANDSCAP INGTOTAL OPEN SPACE17,298 TOT. SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITSREAR YARD AREAS34,359 TOT. SF / 23.4% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITSCITY PARKWAY LANDSCAPE489 TOT. SF / 0.3 % W ITH IN PROJECT LIM ITSSURFACING: PARKWAY LANDSCAPINGTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA51,470 TOT. SF / 34.5% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITSR.O.W. HARDSCAPE1,383 TOT. SF / 0 .9% W ITH IN PROJECT L IMITSSURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETEDRIVE AISLE HARDSCAPE30,810 TOT. SF / 20.9% OF PROJECTSURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETEHARDSCAPE (SIDEWALKS)9,578 TOT. SF / 6 .5% W ITH IN PROJECT L IMITSSURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETETOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA40,388 TOT. SF / 27.1% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS6ft HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM WALL w/ 4inHIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM CAPPARKING STALLS TO BE STRIPED PERCITY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION17.112.111HTRASH COLLECTION BIN LOCATION PERREPUBLIC SERVICES WILL SERVELETTERC01C02L01L02L03L04L05L06L07L08L09P01W01DWELLING UNIT LEGENDSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDA Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 20 This page intentionally left blank. 8601 Mission DriveCity of RosemeadFigure 6aPlan 1 Exterior Elevations (Spanish Colonial)9'-1"9'-1" 25'-3"1003054102002102152151111403005001017104101003003052104105002001101014:124:124:12 4:124:12 4:124:124:124:124:12 4:124:12 4:12 410500100210410101100210410200101A1.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L I CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESSPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN40812FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONROOF PLANPLAN 1 SFDEXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHEXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC TILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 22 This page intentionally left blank. 8601 Mission DriveCity of RosemeadFigure 6bPlan 1 Exterior Elevations (Hacienda)9'-1"9'-1" 25'-3"10071020021041521011114030040560040010122041010030021020060040541540010111010'-11"4:124:124:12 4:12 4:12 4:124:124:12 4:124:124:12 4:12 405100210410400101100210410200101A1.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L I CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESHACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN40812FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONROOF PLANPLAN 1 SFDEXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHEXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC TILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 This page intentionally left blank. 8601 Mission DriveCity of RosemeadFigure 6cPlan 2 Exterior Elevations (Spanish Colonial)9'-1"9'-1" 27'-2"1003054102002107002151111403005004101017104101003003052104105002005001011104:124:124:12 4:124:124:124:124:12 4:12 410500100210410305101100210410200300101A2.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L I CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESSPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN40812FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONROOF PLANPLAN 2 SFDEXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHEXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC TILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 This page intentionally left blank. Mission VillasCity of RosemeadFigure 6dPlan 2 Exterior Elevations (Hacienda)9'-1"9'-1" 27'-2"1007102002106002101111403004054007102151012204101003002102006004004057101011104:124:124:12 4:124:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:12 710210410400100215101100210410200400300101A2.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L I CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESHACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN40812FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONROOF PLANPLAN 2 SFDEXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHEXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC TILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 28 This page intentionally left blank. Mission VillasCity of RosemeadFigure 6eDuplex Exterior Elevations (Spanish Colonial)1401409'-1"9'-1" 27'-10" 9'-1"9'-1" 27'-10"100410305500300210200111210140410101200700100305410300500210101110100300500305410210101215200200700100305410300500210410110101A3.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L I CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESSPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS40812FRONT ELEVATIONDUPLEXENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 2)REAR / MISSION DRIVE ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 1)EXTERIOR ELEVAT ION MATER IAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF T ILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO F IN ISHEXTERIOR STUCCO F IN ISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC T ILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETA IL 100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30 This page intentionally left blank. Mission VillasCity of RosemeadFigure 6fDuplex Exterior Elevations (Hacienda)1401409'-1"9'-1" 27'-10" 9'-1"9'-1" 27'-10"100400405300210200111210140400101600210200220100710300405210101600110415100300405710210101415200600200220100710300405210110400210101A3.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L I CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESHACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS40812FRONT ELEVATIONDUPLEXENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 2)REAR / MISSION DRIVE ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 1)EXTERIOR ELEVAT ION MATER IAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF T ILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO F IN ISHEXTERIOR STUCCO F IN ISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC T ILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETA IL 100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 32 This page intentionally left blank Mission Villas City of RosemeadFigure 7Conceptual Landscape PlanSchematic Landscape Plan8601-8623 Mission Drive, Rosemead,CABORSTEIN ENTERPRISESProject No.: EBU02Date: April 6, 20222nd City SubmittalMISSION VILLAS 80'Scale: 1" = 40'-0"040'20'1. Central Community Open Space area with a fire tab le and adirondack seating area forsocial events and/or group gatherings, and Turf Area with bench seat for passive & activeplay.2. Main Pro ject Entry: Enhanced veh icular paving with palms and specimen trees. Refer toSheet L-2 Entry Enlargement Plan.3. Vehicular S liding Gates.4. Entry Kiosk.5. Community bench at open space.6. Dog Bag Station. Color: Black.7. (3) Community Cluster Mailboxes and (1) Parcel Locker, per USPS review and approval.8. Enhanced Paving at Main Project Entry.9. Monument Signage at Project Entry.10. Proposed tree, per Planting Plan.11. Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per Wall & Fence Plan.12. 4' wide community natural colored concrete sidewalk, with broom finish and saw-cut joints.13. 4' wide unit entry natural colored concrete wa lk, with broom finish and saw-cut joints.14. Natural colored concrete driveway, with light broom finish and tooled joints.15. Private patio / yard area, homeowner maintained.16. Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained.17. Property line.18. Public street R.O.W.19. Ex isting publ ic street sidewalk, per Civil plans.21. Residential/Guest parking stall.22. Utilities per Civil plans.23. Temporary Bicyc le Parking (1 stall for 2 bikes)24. Privacy Hedge, per P lanting Plan.LEGEND15111310161084921111111112710141515111115102424181719212111610161661072323*Conceptual images (provided herein are conceptual and subject to change)ENTRY ENLARGEMENTL2115'-0"8'-5"2'-5"5'-0"Mission DriveLimit of Work Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of Work2416Schematic Landscape Plan8601-8623 Mission Drive, Rosemead,CABORSTEIN ENTERPRISESProject No.: EBU02Date: April 6, 20222nd City SubmittalMISSION VILLAS 80'Scale: 1" = 40'-0"040'20'1. Central Community Open Space area with a fire table and adirondack seating area forsocial events and/or group gatherings, and Turf Area with bench seat for passive & activeplay.2. Main Project Entry: Enhanced vehicular paving with palms and specimen trees. Refer toSheet L-2 Entry Enlargement Plan.3. Vehicular Sliding Gates.4. Entry Kiosk.5. Community bench at open space.6. Dog Bag Station. Color: Black.7. (3) Community Cluster Mailboxes and (1) Parcel Locker, per USPS review and approval.8. Enhanced Paving at Main Project Entry.9. Monument Signage at Project Entry.10. Proposed tree, per Planting Plan.11. Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per Wall & Fence Plan.12. 4' wide community natural colored concrete sidewalk, with broom finish and saw-cut joints.13. 4' wide unit entry natural colored concrete walk, with broom finish and saw-cut joints.14. Natural colored concrete driveway, with light broom finish and tooled joints.15. Private patio / yard area, homeowner maintained.16. Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained.17. Property line.18. Public street R.O.W.19. Existing public street sidewalk, per Civil plans.21. Residential/Guest parking stall.22. Utilities per Civil plans.23. Temporary Bicycle Parking (1 stall for 2 bikes)24. Privacy Hedge, per Planting Plan.LEGEND15111310161084921111111112710141515111115102424181719212111610161661072323*Conceptual images (provided herein are conceptual and subject to change)ENTRY ENLARGEMENTL2115'-0"8'-5"2'-5"5'-0"Mission DriveLimit of Work Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of Work2416 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 34 This page intentionally left blank. Mission VillasCity of RosemeadFigure 8Wall and Fence PlanGAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE5 9710111213141516172021222332333134352425262728293018191236483637Limit of WorkLimit of W o r k Limit o f W o r k Limit of Work Limit of WorkMMM I S S I O N D R.//////////// // // //WALL LEGEND6'-0" High Split-face CMU Wall, with 4" High Split-face CMU Cap (Color: Tan).6'-0" High Vinyl private yard Fence (Color: White)5'-0" High T. S. Metal Fence (Color: Black).6'-6" High (24" sq.) Stone veneer over CMU pilaster, with Precast cap (Stone Veneer:To match Architecture; Cap Color: Tan).5'-6" High Vinyl private yard Gate (Color: White).ADA Path of Travel.Schematic Wall & Fence Plan8601-8623 Mission Drive, Rosemead,CABORSTEIN ENTERPRISESProject No.: EBU02Date: April 6, 20222nd City SubmittalMISSION VILLAS 80'Scale: 1" = 40'-0"040'20'NOTES:1. Perimeter walls to be examined in field to determineif existing walls will remain or be replaced.2. Minimum setbacks required per RMC Table17.24.030.2:- Side Yard (East Side Adjoining Residential Zone): 5feet of 10% of the lot width, whichever is greater.- Side Yard (West Side): None (Please note thatSouthern California Edison may have setback requirements due to high-voltage transmission linesadjacent to the project site.- Rear Yard: 5 feet of 10% of the lot width, whicheveris greater.GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLEGAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLEGASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLEGAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE5 9710111213141516172021222332333134352425262728293018191236483637Limit of WorkLimit of W o r k Limit of Work Limit of Work Limit of WorkMMM I S S I O N D R.// // ////// // // // //WALL LEGEND6'-0" High Split-face CMU Wall, with 4" High Split-face CMU Cap (Color: Tan).6'-0" High Vinyl private yard Fence (Color: White)5'-0" High T. S. Metal Fence (Color: Black).6'-6" High (24" sq.) Stone veneer over CMU pilaster, with Precast cap (Stone Veneer:To match Architecture; Cap Color: Tan).5'-6" High Vinyl private yard Gate (Color: White).ADA Path of Travel.Schematic Wall & Fence Plan8601-8623 Mission Drive, Rosemead,CABORSTEIN ENTERPRISESProject No.: EBU02Date: April 6, 20222nd City SubmittalMISSION VILLAS 80'Scale: 1" = 40'-0"040'20'NOTES:1. Perimeter walls to be examined in field to determineif existing walls will remain or be replaced.2. Minimum setbacks required per RMC Table17.24.030.2:- Side Yard (East Side Adjoining Residential Zone): 5feet of 10% of the lot width, whichever is greater.- Side Yard (West Side): None (Please note thatSouthern California Edison may have setback requirements due to high-voltage transmission linesadjacent to the project site.- Rear Yard: 5 feet of 10% of the lot width, whicheveris greater. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 36 This page intentionally left blank. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 19 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST This section includes the completed environmental checklist form. The checklist form is used to assist in evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project. The checklist form identifies potential Project effects as follows: 1) Potentially Significant Impact; 2) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated; 3) Less Than Significant Impact; and, 4) No Impact. Substantiation and clarification for each checklist response is provided in Section 5 (Environmental Evaluation). Included in the discussion for each topic are standard condition/regulations and mitigation measures, if necessary, that are recommended for implementation as part of the proposed Project. 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below () would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected Aesthetics Agriculture and Forest Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology/Soils/Paleontological Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 20 4.2 DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) on the basis of this initial evaluation I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required. Signature Date City of Rosemead Printed Name For EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to Projects like the one involved (e.g., the Project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on Project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the Project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a Project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as Project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 21 significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) “Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from “Earlier Analysis,” as described in (5) below, may be cross- referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(d). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: (a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. (b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. (c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the Project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a Project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The analysis of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 22 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 1. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099 would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the Project is in an urbanized area, would the Project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. Scenic vistas consist of expansive, panoramic views of important, unique, or highly valued visual features that are seen from public viewing areas. This definition combines visual quality with information about view exposure to describe the level of interest or concern that viewers may have for the quality of a particular view of visual setting. The Project site is within an urbanized developed area of the City of Rosemead. The site is surrounded by single family residences to the north, east, south, and open space to the west. Existing public vantage points exist along roadways that surround the Project site, which do not contain scenic vistas. Due to the existing one and two-story development surrounding the Project site and a flat topography, the views surrounding the Project site are limited to roadway corridor views of developed areas along Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue with powerlines along Walnut Grove Avenue. The Project would develop the site and construct new two-story residential structures that would be the same height or one story higher than the residential structures that are located to the east, north, and south of the site. In addition, the new residential buildings would be setback 30-feet from Mission Drive and the proposed 6-foot-high wall would be setback 16-feet from Mission Drive and the proposed structures on the site would not encroach into views along the urban roadway corridor. Also, the area is urban and there are no existing scenic vistas. Thus, development of the Project site Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 23 with two-story residential buildings would not obstruct, interrupt, or diminish a scenic vista; and impacts would not occur. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The nearest Officially Designated State Scenic Highway is a portion of State Route 110 (SR-110), which is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Project site and is not visible from the Project site. (Caltrans 2022). Therefore, no impacts to scenic resources within a state scenic highway would occur. c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the Project is in an urbanized area, would the Project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within an urbanized area of the City of Rosemead, along Mission Drive and is surrounded by residential and open space. The Project site is vacant and undeveloped with some groundcover and onsite improvements. Public views of the Project site from the street are limited to views of chain-link and picket fencing surrounding the Project site with scattered palm trees throughout the site as shown on Figure 4a and 4b, Site Photos. The Project would develop the Project to provide 37 two-story dwelling units as shown in Figure 5, Conceptual Site Plan. The architectural design of the proposed buildings is characterized as traditional architectural elements, multi-level rooflines, and an earth tone color scheme. The Project would utilize concrete roof tile, metal sectional garage doors, exterior stucco finish with foam trim, painted shutters, and exterior wood as shown in Figures 6a through 6f, Exterior Elevations. Large residential windows, sidewalks, and landscaping would provide a residential character. A 6-foot-high block wall is proposed to be located along the frontage of the Project site along Mission Drive and along the boundary of the Project site. The wall would be setback 16 feet from the right of way with landscape improvements within the setback, as shown in Figure 5, Conceptual Site Plan. Therefore, forefront public views of the site would be primarily of the new landscaping, decorative wall, and the driveway with enhanced pavement along Mission Drive. General Plan. The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential which consists primarily of detached single-family dwellings on individual lots and allows for a maximum permitted density of 7.0 dwelling units per acre. As part of the Project, a General Plan Amendment is proposed to change the land use designation of the site to Medium Density Residential, which allows for up to 12 units per acre. Housing types within this density range include single-family homes on smaller lots, duplexes, and attached units. The proposed Project would result in a density of 11 units per acre, which would not exceed the allowable density for the proposed land use designation. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an applicable General Plan land use regulation related to scenic quality, and impacts would be less than significant. Zoning. The Project site is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. Section 17.12.010 describes the R-1 zoning district as areas characterized by single-family dwellings. The Project includes a zone change to Planned Development (P-D). The P-D zone is intended to provide for residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional developments that are characterized by innovative use and design concepts. This zone provides for a new development to offer amenities, quality, design excellence and other similar benefits to the community and not be inhibited by strict Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 numerical development standards. A P-D zone shall include a parcel of land containing not less than one acre. The proposed density of a residential planned development shall be consistent with the land use element of the General Plan. As detailed, in Table AES-1, the Project would be consistent with the Municipal Code standards for the P-D zone. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an applicable zoning regulation related to scenic quality, and impacts would be less than significant. Table AES-1: Consistency with Proposed Zoning Development Standards Development Feature P-D Zoning Requirement Proposed Project Consistency Minimum Lot Area 1 acre Consistent. The proposed Project site is 3.38 net acres which exceeds the 1 acre minimum. Minimum Lot Width None Consistent. The Project site has varying lot widths and lot sizes ranging from 2,002 SF to 127,151 SF Maximum Density 12 DU/Acre Consistent. The Project proposes to have a density of 11 DU/acre. Setbacks Front 10 feet Consistent The proposed Project would provide a minimum 20-foot front setback from Mission Drive. Front (Adjoining Residential Zone) 15 feet Not Applicable. The front of the proposed Project does not adjoin a residential zone. Side 10 feet Not Applicable. Side 1st Floor (Adjoining Residential Zone) Greater of 5 ft or 10% of lot width Consistent. The Project would provide minimum 13-foot side setbacks from lots adjoining residential zones. for abutting the Residential R zone to the east. Side 2nd Floor 5 ft min. 15 ft combined Consistent. The Project would provide minimum 13-foot side setbacks from lots adjoining residential zones. for abutting the Residential R zone to the east. Rear 10 feet Not Applicable. Rear (Adjoining Residential Zone) Greater of 5 ft or 10% of lot width Consistent. The Project would provide rear setbacks from the patios that range from 6.24 feet to 15 feet. Height None Consistent. The proposed residential dwelling units would range from 25 feet 3 inches to 27 feet 10 inches in height. Parking 2 spaces per dwelling unit in an enclosed garage Guest parking: 1 space per 2 dwelling units Consistent. The Project would include 74 garage spaces and 25 guest spaces which would exceed the 19-guest space requirement. Thus, a total of 99 spaces would be included which exceeds the 2 spaces per dwelling unit requirement. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within a developed urban area. Existing sources of light in the vicinity of the Project site includes: streetlights, lights from the athletic tract adjacent to the north of the site, lighting from vehicle headlights along Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue, parking lot lighting, building illumination, security lighting, landscape lighting, and lighting from building interiors that passthrough windows. Construction. Although construction activities would occur primarily during daylight hours, Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 25 construction activities could extend into the evening hours, as permitted by Chapter 8.36 of the City’s Municipal Code (permitted construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday). Construction activities shall not take place on Sunday or federal holidays. Lighting required during construction of the Project would be shielded and directed toward work activity areas, in compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 17.88 (included as PPP AES-1) that provides for directing lighting away from adjacent uses and intensity of security lighting. In addition, construction may include nighttime security lighting; however, this would be similar to the surrounding uses adjacent to the site and streetlights. Also, any construction related lighting would be temporary (approximately 11 months). Therefore, construction of the Project would not create a new source of substantial light that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, and light impacts associated with construction would be less than significant. Operation. The Project would include the provision of nighttime lighting for security purposes around entrances, public sidewalks, open areas, and parking areas pursuant to Chapter 17.88 of the City’s Municipal Code. The Project would introduce new sources of light with implementation of the Project. Thus, the Project would contribute additional sources to the overall ambient nighttime lighting conditions. However, the site is located within an urban area that includes various sources of nighttime lighting, including the street lighting along Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue. All outdoor lighting would be of low intensity and shielded so that light will not spill out onto surrounding properties or Project above the horizontal plane in accordance with Chapter 17.88 of the City’s Municipal Code (included as PPP AES-1). Because the Project area is within an already developed area with various sources of existing nighttime lighting, and because the Project would be required to comply with the City’s lighting regulations that would be verified by the City during the plan check and permitting process, any increase in lighting that would be generated by the Project would not adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Overall, lighting impacts would be less than significant. Reflective light (glare) can be caused by sunlight or artificial light reflecting from finished surfaces such as window glass or other reflective materials. Generally, darker or mirrored glass would have a higher visible light reflectance than clear glass. Buildings constructed of highly reflective materials from which the sun reflects at a low angle can cause adverse glare. However, the Project would not use highly reflective surfaces, or glass sided buildings. Although the building would contain windows, the windows would be comprised of blue reflective glazing, which reduces glare over other transparent surfaces and the windows would be separated by stucco that would limit the potential of glare. As described previously, onsite lighting would be angled down and be compliant with Chapter 17.88 of the City’s Municipal Code (included as PPP AES-1), which would avoid the potential of onsite lighting generating offsite glare. Therefore, the Project would not generate substantial sources of glare, and impacts would be less than significant. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP AES-1: Light and Glare. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 17.88, exterior lighting shall be of low intensity and shielded so that light will not spill out onto surrounding properties or Project above the horizontal plane. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to aesthetics are required. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 Sources Caltrans State Scenic Highway System Map (Caltrans 2022). Accessed: https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2e921695c43643b1aaf7 000dfcc19983 City of Rosemead General Plan. Accessed: https://cdn5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf City of Rosemead Municipal Code. Accessed: https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 27 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the Project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 28 a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The Project site is vacant and undeveloped and located within an area that is largely developed for urban uses. The Project site and its vicinity are void of agricultural uses. The California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program identifies the site as urban land and it is not identified as Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (CDC 2021). Therefore, conversion of such farmland designations would not occur from implementation of the proposed Project. No impact would occur. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The Project site is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential, which does not provide for agricultural uses. In addition, the site is not subject to a Williamson Act contract. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to conflict with an existing agricultural zone or Williamson contract, and impacts would not occur. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project site currently vacant and undeveloped and within an urbanized developed area. No forest land exists on or adjacent to the Project site. The Project site is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and is not zoned for forest land or timberland uses. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to a conflict with existing forest land or timberland zoning, and impacts would not occur. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped and within an urbanized developed area. No forest land exists on or adjacent to the Project site. Thus, the Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use, and impacts would not occur. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. As described above, the Project site is vacant and undeveloped and is within an urbanized developed area. No forest land exists on or adjacent to the Project site. Therefore, the implementation of the proposed Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which would result in the conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use or the conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, and Policies related to agriculture and forestry that are applicable to the Project. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 29 Mitigation Measure No mitigation measures related to agriculture and forestry are required. Sources California Department of Conservation (CDC 2022). Division of Land Resource Protection. California Important Farmland Finder. Available at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the Project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people? The discussion below is based on the Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis, prepared by EPD Solutions. Inc., which is included as Appendix A. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdictional boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for preparing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which addresses federal and state Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements. The 2016 AQMP details goals, policies, and programs for improving air quality in the Basin. As described in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993), for purposes of analyzing consistency with the AQMP, if a proposed Project would result in growth that is substantially greater than what was anticipated, then the proposed Project would conflict with the AQMP. On the other hand, if a Project’s density is within the anticipated growth of a jurisdiction, its emissions would be consistent with the assumptions in the AQMP, and the Project would not conflict with SCAQMD’s attainment plans. In addition, the SCAQMD considers Projects consistent with the AQMP if the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause a new violation. The site is an undeveloped site that is located along a minor arterial roadway that is adjacent to residential land uses and open space. The proposed Project would develop 37 two-story dwelling units on the site. As further described in Section 14, Population and Housing, the 37 two-story Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 31 dwelling units would result in a 1.2 percent increase in residential units within the City. This limited level of growth would not exceed growth Projections and would be consistent with the assumptions in the 2016 AQMP. Also, emissions generated by construction and operation of the proposed Project would not exceed thresholds. As described in the analysis below and detailed in Appendix A, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause a new violation. Therefore, impacts related to conflict with the 2016 AQMP from the proposed Project would be less than significant. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less than Significant Impact. The South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) is in a non-attainment status for federal ozone standards, federal carbon monoxide standards, and state and federal particulate matter standards. Any development in the SCAB, including the proposed Project, could cumulatively contribute to these pollutant violations. The methodologies from the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook are used in evaluating Project impacts. SCAQMD has established daily mass thresholds for regional pollutant emissions, which are shown in Table AQ-1. Should construction or operation of the proposed Project exceed these thresholds a significant impact could occur; however, if estimated emissions are less than the thresholds, impacts would be considered less than significant. Table AQ-1: SCAQMD Regional Daily Emissions Thresholds Pollutant Construction (lbs/day) Operations (lbs/day) NOx 100 55 VOC 75 55 PM10 150 150 PM2.5 55 55 SOx 150 150 CO 550 550 Lead 3 3 Source: Regional Thresholds presented in this table are based on the SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, March 2015 (revised April 2019) Construction Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would generate pollutant emissions from the following construction activities: demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, architectural coating. The amount of emissions generated on a daily basis would vary, depending on the intensity and types of construction activities occurring. Construction activities would generate emissions from the demolition of the onsite pavement, site preparation, grading, and building construction. In addition, the Project would generate a need for construction worker vehicle trips to and from the Project site during the estimated 11 months of construction. It is mandatory for all construction Projects to comply with several SCAQMD Rules, including Rule 403 for controlling fugitive dust, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions from construction activities. Rule 403 requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the proposed Project site, covering all trucks hauling Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 32 soil with a fabric cover and maintaining a freeboard height of 12-inches, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. Compliance with Rule 403 was accounted for in the construction emissions modeling and is included as PPP AQ-2. In addition, implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 that governs the VOC content in architectural coating, paint, thinners, and solvents, would be required and is included as PPP AQ-3. As shown in Table AQ-2, CalEEMod results provide that construction emissions generated by the proposed Project would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Therefore, construction activities would result in a less than significant impact. Table AQ-2: Regional Construction Emissions Summary Construction Activity Maximum Daily Regional Emissions (pounds/day) ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 2023 Demolition 2.9 28.3 24.9 0.0 1.7 1.2 Site Prep 4.0 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3 Grading 2.1 20.1 20.7 0.0 2.8 1.8 Building Construction 1.4 13.1 15.7 0.0 0.6 0.6 Paving 1.1 8.5 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 Maximum Daily Emissions 4.0 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3 2024 Paving 1.1 8.2 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 Architectural Coating 31.3 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Maximum Daily Emissions 31.3 8.2 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 Maximum Daily Emission 2023-2024 31.3 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Notes: NOx = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 and PM2.5 = particular matter; ROG = reactive organic gasses; SOx = sulfur oxides Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A) Operation Implementation of the 37 two-story dwelling units would result in long-term regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors associated with area sources, such as natural gas consumption, landscaping, applications of architectural coatings, and consumer products. However, operational vehicular emissions would generate a majority of the emissions generated from the Project. Operational emissions associated with the proposed Project were modeled using CalEEMod and are presented in Table AQ-3. As shown, the proposed Project would result in long-term regional emissions of the criteria pollutants that would be below the SCAQMD’s applicable thresholds. Therefore, the Project’s operational emissions would not exceed the NAAQS and CAAQS, would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant impacts, and would be less than significant. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 33 Table AQ-3: Summary of Regional Operational Emissions Operational Activity Maximum Daily Regional Emissions (pounds/day) ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Area 2.2 0.6 2.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 Energy 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 Mobile 1.3 1.1 11.6 0.0 0.9 0.2 Total Project Operational Emissions 3.5 2.4 14.2 0.0 1.0 0.3 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A) c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD recommends the evaluation of localized NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 construction-related impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. Such an evaluation is referred to as a localized significance threshold (LST) analysis. The impacts were analyzed pursuant to the SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. SCAQMD has developed LSTs that represent the maximum emissions from a Project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards, and thus would not cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts. LSTs are developed based on the ambient concentrations of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 pollutants for each of the 38 source receptor areas (SRAs) in the SCAB. The Project site is located in SRA 11, South San Gabriel Valley. Sensitive receptors can include residential uses such as long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, and retirement homes. Residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, and athletic facilities can also be considered sensitive receptors. The nearest LST sensitive receptors to the Project site are the existing residences that are to the northwest of the site. Construction The localized thresholds from the mass rate look-up tables in SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology document, were developed for use on Projects that are less than or equal to 5-acres in size or have a disturbance of less than or equal to 5 acres daily and were used to evaluate LSTs. Localized construction emissions associated with the proposed Project were modeled using CalEEMod and are presented in Table AQ-4. As shown in Table AQ-4, with implementation of SCAQMD Rules 403 and 1113 (included as PPP AQ-2 and PPP AQ-3), the maximum daily construction emissions from the proposed Project would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LST thresholds. The maximum daily emissions assumes that demolition, preparation, grading, building construction, and paving would overlap and occur at the same time. However, these are separate stages of work and would not occur simultaneously. Thus, a conservative analysis was utilized for the maximum daily emissions. Table AQ-4: Localized Construction Emissions Construction Activity Maximum Daily Regional Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 2022 Demolition 27.3 23.5 1.7 1.2 Site Prep 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 34 Grading 20.0 19.7 2.8 1.8 Building Construction 12.8 14.3 0.6 0.6 Paving 8.5 10.5 0.4 0.4 Maximum Daily Emissions 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3 2023 Paving 8.2 10.5 0.4 0.4 Architectural Coating 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 Maximum Daily Emissions 8.2 10.5 0.4 0.4 Maximum Daily Emission 2023-2024 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 121 1,031 7 5 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A) Operation Localized Significance Analysis. The proposed Project would operate 37 two-story dwelling units, which would not involve vehicles idling or queueing for long periods. Therefore, due to the lack of significant stationary source emissions, impacts related to operational localized significance thresholds would be less than significant. CO Hotspots. Areas of vehicle congestion have the potential to create pockets of CO called hotspots. These pockets have the potential to exceed the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm. Because CO is produced in greatest quantities from vehicle combustion and does not readily disperse into the atmosphere, adherence to ambient air quality standards is typically demonstrated through an analysis of localized CO concentrations. Hotspots are typically produced at intersections, where traffic congestion is highest because vehicles queue for longer periods and are subject to reduced speeds. With the turnover of older vehicles and introduction of cleaner fuels, electric vehicles, and vehicles with stop-start systems (where the engine shuts down when the vehicle is stopped and restarts when the break petal is released), as well as implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations in the SCAB and the state have steadily declined. The analysis of CO hotspots compares the volume of traffic that has the potential to generate a CO hotspot (exceedance the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm) and the volume of traffic with implementation of the proposed Project. In 2003, the SCAQMD estimated that a Project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour—or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix—in order to exceed state standards and generate a CO hot spot. As detailed in Section 17, Transportation (Table TR-1), based on the trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021, the proposed Project would generate 26 vehicle trips (7 inbound trips and 19 outbound trips) during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the Project would generate 35 new vehicle trips (22 inbound trips and 13 outbound trips). Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an increase in traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour—or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix and would not generate a CO hotspot. Therefore, impacts related to CO hotspots from operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 35 d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not emit other emissions, such as those generating objectionable odors, that would affect a substantial number of people. The threshold for odor is identified by SCAQMD Rule 402, Nuisance, which states: A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals. The type of facilities that are considered to result in other emissions, such as objectionable odors, include wastewater treatments plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities. The proposed Project would implement residential development within the Project area that does not involve the types of uses that would emit objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. In addition, odors generated by non-residential land uses are required to be in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402, which would prevent nuisance odors. During construction, emissions from construction equipment, architectural coatings, and paving activities may generate odors. However, these odors would be temporary, intermittent in nature, and would not affect a substantial number of people. The noxious odors would be confined to the immediate vicinity of the construction equipment. Also, the short-term construction-related odors would cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor-producing materials. Therefore, impacts associated with other emissions, such as odors, would not adversely affect a substantial number of people. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 402. The Project shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which includes the following: • All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 36 • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily during dry weather; preferably in the mid-morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule (SCAQMD) Rule 1113. Only “Low-Volatile Organic Compounds” paints (no more than 50 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications shall be used. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to air quality are required. Sources Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis. Prepared by EPD Solutions (EPD, 2022) (Appendix A). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 37 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The discussion below is based on the General Biological Assessment, prepared by Hernandez Environmental Services, which is included as Appendix B. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is vacant and contains a portion of a paved driveway, disturbed dirt trails, and gravel. The perimeters of the site are bound by chain-link fencing, masonry block walls, and plastic fencing. There are palm trees present along the Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 38 northwest property boundary. The Project site is surrounded by urban developed areas with structures, paved parking, and ornamental landscaping. Sensitive Plant Species The Project site consists of ruderal habitat dominated by non-native plant species. A total of 45 sensitive species of plants have the potential to occur on or within the vicinity of the Project site. A total of 13 plant species are listed as state or federally Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate species. A field survey was conducted by Hernandez Environmental Services on June 27, 2022. Linear transects approximately 50 feet apart were walked for 100 percent coverage. All species observed were recorded and Global Positioning System (GPS) way points were taken to delineate specific habitat types and species locations. Table BIO-1 shows survey results for listed and potential plant species and demonstrates that no sensitive plant species are present on the Project site. Table Bio-1: Potentially Occurring Plant Species Plant Species Presence Braunton’s Milk-vetch Not Present Parish’s Brittlescale Not Present Nevin’s Barberry Not Present Lucky Morning-glory Not Present Southern Tarplant Not Present Smoorth Tarplant Not Present Parry’s Spineflower Not Present Slender-horned Spineflower Not Present San Gabriel Mountains Dudleya Not Present Mesa Horkelia Not Present Coulter’s Goldfields Not Present California Orcutt Grass Not Present Brand’s Star Phacelia Not Present Source: Hernandez, 2022 (Appendix B) Sensitive Animal Species As discussed above, a field survey was conducted by Hernandez Environmental Services on June 27, 2022, linear transects approximately 50 feet apart were walked for 100 percent coverage. All species observed were recorded and Global Positioning System (GPS) way points were taken to delineate specific habitat types and species locations. Based on the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), a total of 45 sensitive species of animals have the potential to occur on or within the vicinity of the Project site. A total of 10 wildlife species are listed as state and/or federally Threatened, Endangered, Rare or Candidate Species. Table BIO-2 below shows survey results for listed and potential plant species and demonstrates that no sensitive animal species are present on the Project site, with the exception of the Bell’s Sage Sparrow that has the potential to be present. Table Bio-2: Potentially Occurring Animal Species Plant Species Presence Arroyo Toad Not currently present, no potential for presence Swainson’s Hawk Not currently present, no potential for presence Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 39 Bell’s Sage Sparrow Not currently present, has potential to be present in future Santa Ana Sucker Not currently present, no potential for presence Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Not currently present, no potential for presence Coastal California gnatcatcher Not currently present, no potential for presence Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Not currently present, no potential for presence Southern Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog Not currently present, no potential for presence Bank Swallow Not currently present, no potential for presence Least Bell’s Vireo Not currently present, no potential for presence Coulter’s Goldfields Not currently present, no potential for presence California Orcutt Grass Not currently present, no potential for presence Brand’s Star Phacelia Not currently present, no potential for presence Source: Hernandez, 2022 (Appendix B) As determined by the field survey and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare Plant Inventory, no endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or California Native Plant Society (CNPS) currently occur on the site. However, The Bell’s Sage Sparrow has potential to occur onsite. Therefore, Mitigation Measure (MM) BIO-1 is included to require vegetation removal and other disturbance activities to be conducted outside of nesting bird season and would require a pre-construction nesting bird survey if construction activities are required during nesting bird season. Potential impacts to the Bell’s Sage Sparrow would be less than significant with mitigation. As no sensitive species or habitat occur onsite and the Project would comply with MM BIO-1, implementation of the Project would not result in an adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any sensitive species, and impacts would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. Riparian habitats occur along the banks of rivers, streams, or wetland areas. Sensitive natural communities are natural communities that are considered rare in the region by regulatory Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 40 agencies or are known to provide habitat for sensitive animal or plant species. As described in the previous response, the Project site is within an urban area, developed, and does not contain any natural habitats, including riparian habitat or sensitive natural community. Additionally, the Project site is bound by developed areas that include buildings, pavement, roadways, and small areas of open space that do not contain sensitive natural habitat areas. Thus, no impacts related to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans would result from Project implementation. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including but not limited to, marsh, vernal, pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. Wetlands are defined under the federal Clean Water Act as land that is flooded or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that normally does support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted to life in saturated soils. Wetlands include areas such as swamps, marshes, and bogs. The Project site and adjacent areas are located within a developed urban area and do not contain wetlands. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts to wetlands. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Wildlife corridors are areas where wildlife movement is concentrated due to natural or anthropogenic constraints and corridors provide access to resources such as food, water, and shelter. Animals use these corridors to move between different habitats and provide avenues for wildlife dispersal, migration, and contact between other populations. The Project site does not support conditions of migratory wildlife corridors or linkages. The Project site is surrounded by a roadway and developed land uses. The site and surrounding areas do not provide function for wildlife movement. Additionally, the surrounding area is developed and urban. There are no rivers, creeks, or open drainages near the site that could function as a wildlife corridor. Thus, implementation of the Project would not result in impacts related to wildlife movement or wildlife corridors. However, the Project site contains existing ornamental trees that could be used for nesting by bird species that are protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503.5, 3511, and 3515 during the avian nesting and breeding season that occurs between February 1 and September 15. The provisions of the MBTA prohibits disturbing or destroying active nests. Therefore, MM BIO-1 has been included to require that if commencement of vegetation clearing occurs between February 1 and September 15, a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 3 days prior to commencement of activities to confirm the absence of nesting birds. With implementation of MM BIO-1, potential impacts to nesting birds would be less than significant. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. There are no local biological related policies or ordinances, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance that is applicable to the Project. Oak trees in the City are protected under the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 17.104 which creates conditions for the preservation and Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 41 propagation of oak trees within the City. The Project does not contain any oak trees and would install new trees throughout the Project site. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not conflict with local polices or ordinances protecting trees and no impact would occur. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The Project site is disturbed and in an urban area. The Project site does not contain any natural lands that are subject to an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts to biological habitat plans. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies None. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the City Building Department, shall verify that in the event that vegetation and tree removal activities occur within the active breeding season for birds (February 1–September 15), the Project applicant (or their Construction Contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist (meaning a professional biologist that is familiar with local birds and their nesting behaviors) to conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 3 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The nesting survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project-related construction activities, such as noise, human activity, and dust, etc. If active nesting of birds is observed within 100 feet of the designated construction area prior to construction, the qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate buffer around the active nests (e.g., as much as 500 feet for raptors and 300 feet for non-raptors [subject to the recommendations of the qualified biologist]), and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Sources City of Rosemead, Municipal Code, Chapters 17.104, Street Trees. Available at: https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT17 ZO_ART4SUST_CH17.104OATRPR U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/law/migratory-bird-treaty-act-1918 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 42 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the Project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? The discussion below is based on the Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (Appendix C). a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the State CEQA Guidelines, a historical resource is defined as something that meets one or more of the following criteria: (1) listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR); (2) listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1(k); (3) identified as significant in a historical resources survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g); or (4) determined to be a historical resource by the Project’s Lead Agency. According to the PRC, a resource is considered historically significant if it meets at least one of the following criteria: 1) Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; 2) Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history; 3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or 4) Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation. The Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the Project site indicated that a church was constructed on the Project site between 1953 and 1964 but was demolished in 1992. The structure Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 43 was not listed in the CRHR files. The records search and literature review concluded that there is a low potential for prehistoric sites to be contained within the boundaries of the Project site due to the extensive nature of past ground disturbances. In addition, there is a SCE Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV transmission line located within the Project site that was identified as a cultural resource at the SCCIC. However, according to the site record form, the transmission line was evaluated and did not appear to be eligible under National Register/California Register Criterion A/4. In addition, the transmission line is not situated within the Project site and is located above a portion of the site. The 11-mile span of low-voltage electrical transmission lines were not installed or constructed to include any innovative or unique features or materials that could be considered important to local, state, or national history. The records searches did not identify any events on the Project site or persons in relation to the Project site, that would meet the California Register criteria of a historic resource. Therefore, the transmission line does not meet the CEQA criteria for a historic resource and impacts would be less than significant. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As previously described, the Cultural Resources Assessment identified one historic-aged cultural resource onsite. However, the Cultural Resources Assessment concluded that the Transmission Line did not appear to be eligible under National Register/California Register Criterion A/4. The Cultural Resources Assessment (including field survey) prepared for the Project did not identify any archaeological resources within the Project site. However, as discussed in the Cultural Resources Assessment, there is a potential for previously unknown archaeological resources to be below the soil surface. Therefore, MM CUL-1 would require monitoring during ground-disturbing activities such as grading or trenching. In addition, MM TCR-1 would require Native American monitoring to ensure cultural resource impacts would remain less than significant with mitigation. With implementation of MM CUL-1 and MM TCR- 1, potential impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant. c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site has been previously disturbed, as described above, and has not been previously used as a cemetery. It is not anticipated that implementation of the proposed Project would result in the disturbance of human remains. Existing regulation under the California Health and Safety Code, included as PPP CUL-1, outlines the procedures to undertake if human remains are found on the Project site. Compliance with existing regulations would ensure impacts related to potential disturbance of human remains would be less than significant. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Should human remains be discovered during Project construction, the Project will be required to comply with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which states that no further disturbance may occur in the vicinity of the body until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will determine the identity of and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 44 Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. The Applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to perform archaeological monitoring and the archaeologist shall be present during initial ground-disturbing activities (e.g., site preparation and grading) to identify and assess any known or suspected archaeological and/or cultural resource. The qualified archaeologist shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan to address the details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural resource activities that occur on the Project site. The plan shall include a scope of work, project grading and development scheduling, pre-construction meeting (with consultants, contractors, and monitors), a monitoring schedule during all initial ground- disturbance related activities, safety requirements, and protocols to follow in the event of previously unknown cultural resources discoveries that could be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The plan shall be submitted to the City and the Consulting Tribe(s) for review and comment, prior to final approval by the City. Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activity at the Project site, the Project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Rosemead Planning and Building Department prior to the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The Tribal monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project area. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project site are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing activities at the Project site have little to no potential to impact Tribal Cultural Resources. Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. All Tribal Cultural Resources unearthed by Project activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor approved by the Consulting Tribe. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Consulting Tribe shall retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the Project site, all ground disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Work may continue on other parts of the Project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a non-Native American resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 45 Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Sources California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 Brian Smith and Associates. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project. March 2022. (Appendix C) Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(a). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 46 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 6. ENERGY. Would the Project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during Project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? The discussion below is based on the Air Quality, and Energy Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis, prepared by EPD Solutions. Inc., which is included as Appendix A. a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during Project construction or operation? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction During construction of the proposed Project, energy would be consumed in three general forms: 1. Petroleum-based fuels used to power off-road construction vehicles and equipment on the Project sites, construction worker travel to and from the Project sites, as well as delivery truck trips; 2. Electricity associated with providing temporary power for lighting and electric equipment; and 3. Energy used in the production of construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass. Construction activities related to the proposed building and the associated infrastructure would not be expected to result in demand for fuel greater on a per-unit-of-development basis than other development Projects in southern California. Construction does not involve any unusual or increased need for energy. In addition, the extent of construction activities that would occur are limited to an approximate 11-month period, and the demand for construction-related electricity and fuels would be limited to that time frame. Construction contractors are required to demonstrate compliance with applicable California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulations governing the accelerated retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of heavy-duty diesel on- and off-road equipment as part of the City’s construction permitting process. In addition, compliance with existing CARB idling restrictions, which is included as PPP E-1, would reduce fuel combustion and energy consumption. The Project construction fuel usage over the estimated 11-month construction period would result in the need for 10,233 gallons of diesel fuel, which is summarized in Table E-1. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 47 Table E-1: Estimated Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Activity Equipment Number Hours per day Horse- power Days of Construction Total Horsepower- hours Fuel Rate (gal/hp-hr) Fuel Use (gallons) Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 367 2 4,698 0.020615155 97 Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 33 2 385 0.041912413 16 Excavators 3 8 36 2 657 0.019868435 13 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 367 5 17,616 0.020615155 363 Tractors/Loaders/Bac khoes 4 8 84 5 4,973 0.019155948 95 Grading Graders 1 8 148 8 3,884 0.021167864 82 Excavators 1 8 36 8 876 0.019868435 17 Tractors/Loaders/Bac khoes 3 8 84 8 5,967 0.019155948 114 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 367 8 9,395 0.020615155 194 Model Building Construction Cranes 1 8 367 230 195,831 0.014896922 2,917 Forklifts 3 8 82 230 90,528 0.010444038 945 Generator Sets 1 8 14 230 19,062 0.042356362 807 Tractors/Loaders/Bac khoes 1 8 84 230 57,187 0.019155948 1,095 Welder 3 8 46 230 114,264 0.025848623 2,954 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Bac khoes 1 8 84 18 4,476 0.019155948 86 Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 8 10 18 1,613 0.019767572 32 Pavers 1 8 81 18 4,899 0.021536901 106 Paving Equipment 2 8 89 18 9,228 0.01846541 170 Rollers 2 8 36 18 3,940 0.019837453 78 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8 78 18 5,391 0.027606329 149 Total 10,233 Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A) Table E-2 shows that construction related vehicle usage would use approximately 1,246 gallons of diesel fuel and 3,095 gallons of gasoline to travel to and from the Project site. Tables E-3 shows that a total of approximately 11,479 gallons of diesel fuel and 3,095 gallons of gasoline would be used for construction of the proposed Project. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 48 Table E-2: Estimated Construction Vehicle Fuel Consumption Construction Source Number VMT Fuel Rate Gallons of Diesel Fuel Gallons of Gasoline Fuel Haul Trucks 56 1,120 5.96 188 0 Vendor Trucks 4 9,384 8.87 1,058 0 Worker Vehicles 72 80,179 25.91 0 3,095 Total 1,246 3,095 Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A) Table E-3: Estimated Total Construction Fuel Usage Construction Source Gallons of Diesel Fuel Gallons of Gasoline Fuel Construction Vehicles 1,246 3,095 Off-road Construction Equipment 10,233 0 Total 11,479 3,095 Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A) In addition, construction contractors are required to demonstrate compliance with applicable California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulations governing the accelerated retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of heavy-duty diesel on- and off-road equipment. Also, compliance with existing CARB idling restrictions and the use of newer engines and equipment would reduce fuel combustion and energy consumption. Overall, construction activities would require limited energy consumption, would comply with all existing regulations, and would therefore not be expected to use large amounts of energy or fuel in a wasteful manner. Thus, impacts related to construction energy usage would be less than significant. Operation Once operational, the Project would generate demand for electricity, natural gas, as well as gasoline for motor vehicle trips. Operational use of energy includes the heating, cooling, and lighting of the residences, water heating, operation of electrical systems and plug-in appliances, parking lot and outdoor lighting, and the transport of electricity, natural gas, and water to the areas where they would be consumed. This use of energy is typical for urban development, and no operational activities or land uses would occur that would result in extraordinary energy consumption. As detailed in Table E-4, operation of the proposed Project would use approximately 252,539 kilowatt-hour (kWh) per year of electricity, approximately 1,242,170 thousand British thermal units (kBTU) per year of natural gas, and 45,533 gallons of gasoline annually. Table E-4: Estimated Annual Operational Energy Consumption Operational Source Energy Usage Electricity (Kilowatt-Hours) Project 252,539 Natural Gas (Thousands British Thermal Units) Project 1,242,170 Petroleum (gasoline) Consumption Annual VMT Gallons of Gasoline Fuel Project 1,127,736 43,533 Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 49 Consistent with the 2019 CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24 Part 6), the Project would include photovoltaic (PV) solar panels on the rooftops of each of the residences. The State of California provides a minimum standard for building design and construction standards through Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR). Compliance with Title 24 is mandatory at the time new building permits are issued by the City that the Project shall comply with the adopted California Energy Code (Code of Regulations, Title 24 Part 6). The City’s administration of the Title 24 requirements includes review of design components and energy conservation measures that occurs during the permitting process, and is included as PPP E-1, which ensures that all requirements are met. Typical Title 24 measures include insulation; use of energy-efficient heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC); energy-efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems; reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water; and incorporation of skylights, etc. In complying with the Title 24 standards, impacts to peak energy usage periods would be minimized, and impacts on statewide and regional energy needs would be reduced. The California Energy Commission estimates that single-family homes built in compliance with the 2019 energy efficiency standards uses about 7 percent less energy due to energy-efficiency measures versus those built under the 2016 code. With use of rooftop solar electricity generation, homes built under the 2019 code use about 53 percent less energy than those under the 2016 standards (2019 Fact Sheet). In addition, the Project would be built to comply with the 2019 energy efficiency standards as discussed in PPP E-1. Thus, operation of the Project would not use large amounts of energy or fuel in a wasteful manner, and less than significant operational energy impacts would occur. b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? No Impact. The proposed Project would be required to meet the California Energy Code efficiency standards in effect during permitting of the Project, as included as PPP E-1. The City’s administration of the requirements includes review of design components and energy conservation measures during the permitting process, which ensures that all requirements are met. In addition, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct opportunities to use renewable energy, such as solar energy. As discussed, the Project proposes to use photovoltaic (PV) solar panels on each of the residences to offset their energy demand in accordance with the existing Title 24 requirements (included as PPP E-1). As such, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, and impacts would not occur. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP E-1: California Energy Code Compliance. The Project is required to comply with the 2019 California Energy Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 12.24) to ensure efficient use of energy. California Energy Code specifications are required to be incorporated into building plans as a condition of building permit approval. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to energy are required. Sources Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Analysis, Prepared by EPD Solutions (EPD, 2022) (Appendix A). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 50 2019 Residential Energy Code Fact Sheet (2019 Fact Sheet). Accessed: https://energycodeace.com/content/resources-ace/file_type=fact-sheet 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Accessed: https://energycodeace.com/site/custom/public/reference-ace- 2019/index.html#!Documents/section1500mandatoryfeaturesanddevices.htm#mairdistributionan dventilationsystemductsplenumsandfans.htm City of Rosemead Municipal Code. Accessed: https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT15 BUCO_CH15.24ENCO Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 51 The discussion below is based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc., 2021 (GEO 2021) (Appendix D), the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Stantec (Phase 1 2021) (Appendix F), and the Paleontological Assessment prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (PALEO 2022) (Appendix E). Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the Project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 52 a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is not located within a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone and no faults were identified on the site (GEO 2021). The closet known active fault is the Elysian Park (Upper) fault located approximately 1.74 miles from the Project site. Therefore, the potential for ground rupture due to an earthquake beneath the site is considered low and any impact would be less than significant. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within a seismically active region of Southern California. As mentioned previously, the Elysian Park (Upper) fault is located approximately 1.74 miles from the site. The amount of motion expected at the Project site can vary from none to forceful depending upon the distance to the fault and the magnitude of the earthquake. Greater movement can be expected at sites located closer to an earthquake epicenter, that consists of poorly consolidated material such as alluvium, and in response to an earthquake of great magnitude. However, the Project site is not located near an earthquake epicenter. Thus, greater movement would not be expected. Structures built in the City of Rosemead are required to be built in compliance with the California Building Code (CBC), which regulates all building and construction Projects within the City and implements a minimum standard for building design and construction that includes specific requirements for seismic safety, excavation, foundations, retaining walls, and site demolition. Compliance with the CBC would include the incorporation of: 1) seismic safety features to minimize the potential for significant effects as a result of earthquakes; 2) proper building footings and foundations; and 3) construction of the building structures so that it would withstand the effects of strong ground shaking. Implementation of CBC standards would be verified by the City during the plan check and permitting process. Because the proposed Project would be constructed in compliance with the CBC, the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact related to strong seismic ground shaking. iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than Significant Impact. Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated, cohesionless soils layers, located within approximately 50 feet of the ground surface, lose strength due to cyclic pore water pressure generation from seismic shaking or other large cyclic loading. During the loss of stress, the soil acquires “mobility” sufficient to permit both horizontal and vertical movements. Soil properties and soil conditions such as type, age, texture, color, and consistency, along with historical depths to ground water are used to identify, characterize, and correlate liquefaction susceptible soils. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, the Project site is not located within a State- designated zone of potentially liquefiable soils (GEO 2021). Additionally, groundwater was not encountered to the maximum depth of 51.5 feet drilled during exploration. Furthermore, Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 53 groundwater well measurements conducted by the Los Angeles County in the vicinity of the Project site since 1949 indicate that groundwater has been deeper than 50 feet for more than 70 years. Therefore, historical high groundwater is anticipated to be deeper than 50 feet below the ground surface. As a result, the potential for liquefaction to occur beneath the site is considered very low (GEO 2021). In addition, the proposed Project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City’s Municipal Code, included as PPP GEO-1, which would be verified through the City’s plan check and permitting process. With compliance with existing regulations, impacts related to seismically related ground failure and liquefaction would be less than significant. iv. Landslides? No Impact. Landslides and other slope failures are secondary seismic effects that occur during or soon after earthquakes. Areas that are most susceptible to earthquakes induced landslides are steep slopes underlain by loose, weak soils, and areas on or adjacent to existing landslide deposits. The site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from approximately 357 to 363 feet above mean sea level (GEO 2021) and is surrounded by level areas that do not include hills or other changes in topography that may result in landslides. As described above, the Project site is located in a seismically active region subject to strong ground shaking. However, the Geotechnical Investigation states that the site is not within an area identified to have a potential for landsliding (GEO 2021). Therefore, the Project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects related to seismically induced landslides. b) Result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed Project has the potential to contribute to soil erosion and the loss of topsoil. Excavations and grading activities that would be required for the Project would expose and loosen topsoil, which could be eroded by wind or water. The City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16, Storm Water Management, implements the requirements of the Los Angeles County Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175, as amended, (MS4 Permit) establishes minimum stormwater management requirements and controls that are required to be implemented for construction activities for the Project. To reduce the potential for soil erosion and the loss of topsoil, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required by these City and RWQCB regulations to be developed by a QSD (Qualified SWPPP Developer), which would be implemented by PPP WQ-1. The SWPPP is required to address site-specific conditions related to specific grading and construction activities that could cause erosion and the loss of topsoil and provide erosion control best management practices (BMPs) to reduce or eliminate the erosion and loss of topsoil. Erosion control BMPs include use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, or gravel bags, stabilized construction entrance/exit, hydroseeding, etc. With compliance with the City’s Municipal Code stormwater management requirements, RWQCB SWPPP requirements, and installation of BMPs, which would be implemented by the City’s Project review by the Department of Public Works, construction impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 54 Less than Significant Impact. Landslides and other forms of mass wasting, including mud flows, debris flows, and soil slips, occur as soil moves downslope under the influence of gravity. Landslides are frequently triggered by intense rainfall or seismic shaking. As described in Response a) iv., the Project site is located in a relatively flat developed urban area that does not contain or adjacent to large slopes, and the Project would not generate large slopes. Therefore, impacts related to landslides would not occur. Lateral spreading is a type of liquefaction‐induced ground failure associated with the lateral displacement of surficial blocks of sediment resulting from liquefaction in a subsurface layer. Once liquefaction transforms the subsurface layer into a fluid mass, gravity plus the earthquake inertial forces may cause the mass to move downslope towards a free face (such as a river channel or an embankment). Lateral spreading may cause large horizontal displacements and such movement typically damages pipelines, utilities, bridges, and structures. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the Project site is not within a liquefaction zone, and high groundwater is not located at the Project site. Therefore, the site has a low potential for lateral spreading. In addition, site soils settlement would be reduced with implementation of the excavation and recompaction of the upper two feet of onsite soils as proposed by the Project and compliance with the CBC. Thus, impacts related to lateral spreading would be less than significant. Subsidence is a general lowering of the ground surface over a large area that is generally attributed to lowering of the ground water levels within a groundwater basin. Localized or focal subsidence or settlement of the ground can occur as a result of an earthquake motion in an area where groundwater in basin is lowered. As described previously, groundwater was not encountered to the maximum depth of 51.5 feet drilled during site exploration (GEO 2021). In addition, the Project would not involve groundwater pumping from the Project area. Thus, impacts related to subsidence would not occur from implementation of the Project. Also, as described in Response a) iii., the Project site is not within a potential liquefaction area as groundwater is not located within 50 feet of the ground surface. Construction would include removal and re-compaction of onsite soils in compliance with the CBC which would also reduce any potential of liquefaction, settlement, and subsidence. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. As described previously, the Project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City’s Municipal Code, which would be verified through the City’s plan check and permitting process. Thus, potential impacts related to liquefaction, settlement, and subsidence would be less than significant. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less than Significant Impact. Expansive soils contain certain types of clay minerals that shrink or swell as the moisture content changes; the shrinking or swelling can shift, crack, or break structures built on such soils. Arid or semiarid areas with seasonal changes of soil moisture experience, such as southern California, have a higher potential of expansive soils than areas with higher rainfall and more constant soil moisture. The Geotechnical Investigation determined that the site soils are anticipated to have a “very low” expansion potential based on soils testing (GEO 2021). In addition, as described in the previous responses, the Project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City’s Municipal Code, that requires appropriate backfill, compaction of soils, and foundation design to ensure stable soils, which would be verified through the City’s plan check and permitting process. Thus, impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 55 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems are proposed. The Project would install onsite sewers that would connect to the existing infrastructure that is adjacent to the site. Therefore, no impacts related to the use of such facilities would occur from implementation of the Project. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Paleontological resources, or fossils, are the remains of ancient plants and animals that can provide scientifically significant information about the history of life on Earth. Paleontological “sensitivity” is defined as the potential for a geologic unit to produce scientifically significant fossils. This sensitivity is determined by rock type, past history of the rock unit in producing significant fossils, and fossil localities that are recorded from that unit. Paleontological sensitivity is assigned based on fossil data collected from the entire geologic unit, not just a specific site. The Paleontological Assessment confirmed that Holocene young alluvial fan and valley deposits are mapped at the surface of the site. Based on the lack of known significant fossil localities nearby and a low sensitivity rating assigned to Holocene-aged young alluvial deposits for yielding paleontological resources, it is recommended that paleontological monitoring not be implemented during mass grading and excavation activities, since impacts to potential paleontological resources are considered to be less than significant. Although monitoring for paleontological resources is not required for the Project, should paleontological resources be discovered at any time during earth disturbance activities, pursuant to MM PAL-1, a paleontologist shall be contacted to assess the find (PALEO 2021). Implementation of MM PAL-1 would reduce impacts to paleontological resources to less than significant. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP GEO-1: California Building Code. The Project is required to comply with the California Building Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 15.04 to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards. California Building Code related and geologist and/or civil engineer specifications for the Project are required to be incorporated into grading plans and specifications as a condition of Project approval. PPP WQ-1: SWPPP. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a QSD (Qualified SWPPP Developer) in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control and the Los Angeles County RWQCB NPDES Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012- 0175. The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other NPDES regulations to limit the potential of erosion and polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Rosemead staff or its designee to confirm compliance. Mitigation Measures Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 56 Mitigation Measure PAL-1: Incidental Discoveries. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the City of Rosemead Planning Department shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans and specifications state that in the event that potential paleontological resources are discovered during excavation, grading, or construction activities, work shall cease within 50 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist (i.e., a practicing paleontologist that is recognized in the paleontological community and is proficient in vertebrate paleontology) from the City or County List of Qualified Paleontologists has evaluated the find and established a protocol for addressing the find, in accordance with federal and state regulations. Construction personnel shall not collect or move any paleontological materials and associated materials. If any fossil remains are discovered, the paleontologist shall make a recommendation if monitoring shall be required for the continuance of earth moving activities, and shall provide such monitoring if required. Sources Paleontological Assessment, prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., 2022 (PALEO 2022) (Appendix E). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Stantec (Phase 1 2021) (Appendix F). Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc., 2020 (GEO 2021) (Appendix D). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 57 The discussion below is based on the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis, prepared by EPD Solutions. Inc., which is included as Appendix A. Explanation Constituent gases of the Earth’s atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role in the Earth’s radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation from the Earth’s surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (O3), water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth’s natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Section 15364.5 of the California Code of Regulations defines GHGs to include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride. Transportation is responsible for 37 percent of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and N2O are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. California has passed several bills and the Governor has signed at least three executive orders regarding greenhouse gases. GHG statues and executive orders (EO) include AB 32, SB 1368, EO S-03-05, EO S-20-06 and EO S-01-07. These regulations require the use of alternative energy, such as solar power. Solar Projects produce electricity with no GHG emissions and assist in offsetting GHG emissions produced by fossil-fuel-fired power plants. Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the Project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 58 a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less than Significant Impact. Global climate change (GCC) describes alterations in weather features (e.g., temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms) that occur across the Earth as a whole. GCC is not confined to a particular Project area and is generally accepted as the consequence of global industrialization over the last 200 years. A typical Project, even a very large one, does not generate enough GHG emissions on its own to influence global climate change significantly; hence, the issue of global climate change is, by definition, a cumulative environmental impact. The principal GHGs of concern contributing to the greenhouse effect are CO2, CH4, N2O, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. GHGs are produced by both direct and indirect emissions sources. Direct emissions include consumption of natural gas, heating and cooling of buildings, landscaping activities and other equipment used directly by land uses. Indirect emissions include the consumption of fossil fuels for vehicle trips, electricity generation, water usage, and solid waste disposal. The large majority of GHG emissions generated from residential Projects are related to vehicle trips. The City has not established local CEQA significance thresholds for GHG emissions; however, the SCAQMD has proposed interim numeric GHG significance thresholds that are based on capture of approximately 90 percent of emissions from development, which is 3,000 metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year (SCAQMD 2008). Construction emissions are amortized over a period of 30 years, added to the operational emissions, and compared to the applicable threshold. This approach is widely used by cities in the South Coast Air Basin, including the City of Rosemead. As such, this threshold is utilized herein to determine if GHG emissions from this Project would be significant. Construction During construction, temporary sources of GHG emissions include construction equipment and workers’ commutes to and from the site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N2O. Construction GHG emissions associated with the proposed Project were modeled using CalEEMod and are presented in Table GHG-1. As shown on Table GHG-1, the Project has the potential to generate a total of approximately 12 MTCO2e per year from construction emissions amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD methodology. Table GHG-1: Project Construction Emissions Activity Annual GHG Emissions (MTCO2e) 2023 369 2024 2 Total Emissions 371 Total Emissions Amortized Over 30 Years 12 Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A) Operation During operations, the proposed residences would generate long-term GHG emissions from vehicular trips; water, natural gas, and electricity consumption; and solid waste generation. Natural gas use results in the emission of two GHGs: CH4 (the major component of natural gas) and CO2 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 59 (from the combustion of natural gas). Electricity use can result in GHG production if the electricity is generated by combusting fossil fuel. Operational GHG emissions associated with the 37 residential units were modeled using CalEEMod and are presented in Table GHG-2. The large majority of GHG emissions generated from the residences would be from vehicle trips. As shown in Table GHG-2, the Project would generate approximately 601 MTCO2e per year, which is less than the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Table GHG-2: Project Total GHG Emissions Activity Annual GHG Emissions (MTCO2e) Project Operational Emissions Mobile 412 Area 10 Energy 172 Water 4 Waste 3 Total Project Gross Operation Emissions 601 Project Construction Emissions 12 Total Emissions 613 Significance Threshold 3,000 Threshold Exceeded? No Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A) b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. As described in the previous response, the Project would not exceed thresholds related to GHG emissions. In addition, the Project would comply with regulations imposed by the state and the SCAQMD that reduce GHG emissions, as described below: • Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) is applicable to the Project because many of the GHG reduction measures outlined in AB 32 (e.g., low carbon fuel standard, advanced clean car standards, and cap-and-trade) have been adopted over the last 5 years and implementation activities are ongoing. The proposed Project would not conflict with fuel and car standards or cap-and-trade. • Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards (AB 1493) establishes fuel efficiency ratings for new (model year 2009-2016) passenger cars and light trucks. The Project would develop new residential units that would not conflict with fuel efficiency standards for vehicles. • Title 24 California Code of Regulations (Title 24) establishes energy efficiency requirements for new construction that address the energy efficiency of new (and altered) buildings. The Project is required to comply with Title 24, which would be verified by the City during the plan check and permitting process. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 60 • Title 17 California Code of Regulations (Low Carbon Fuel Standard [LCFS]) requires carbon content of fuel sold in California to be 10 percent less by 2020. Because the LCFS applies to any transportation fuel that is sold or supplied in California, all vehicle trips generated by the Project would comply with LCFS. • California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881) provides requirements to ensure water efficient landscapes in new development and reduced water waste in existing landscapes. The Project is required to comply with AB 1881 landscaping requirements, which would be verified by the City during the plan check and permitting process. • Emissions from vehicles, which are a main source of operational GHG emissions, would be reduced through implementation of federal and state fuel and air quality emissions requirements that are implemented by CARB. In addition, as described in the previous response, the Project would not result in an exceedance of an air quality standard. The City currently does not have an adopted Climate Action Plan to reduce GHG emissions, and as described in the previous response, emissions would not exceed the thresholds. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies See (b) above for applicable regulations. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to greenhouse gas emissions are required. Sources South Coast Air Quality Management District Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas Significance Thresholds (SCAQMD 2008). Accessed: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa- significancethresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas, Impact Analysis. Prepared by EPD Solutions (EPD, 2022) (Appendix A). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 61 The discussion below is based on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Stantec (Phase I 2021) (Appendix F) and Remedial Excavation Completion Report, prepared by Stantec (Excavation 2022) (Appendix G). a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than Significant Impact. A hazardous material is defined as any material that, due to its quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the Project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the Project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 62 potential hazard to human health and safety or to environment if released into the environment. Hazardous materials include, but are not limited to, hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, and any material that regulatory agencies have a reasonable basis for believing would be injuries to the health and safety of persons or harmful to the environment if released into the home, workplace, or environment. Hazardous wastes require special handling and disposal because of their potential to damage public health and the environment. Construction The proposed construction activities would involve the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials such as paints, solvents, oils, grease, and caulking. In addition, hazardous materials would be needed for fueling and servicing construction equipment on the site. These types of materials are not acutely hazardous, and all storage, handling, use, and disposal of these materials are regulated by federal and state requirements that are implemented by the City during building permitting for construction activities. These regulations include: the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and Hazardous Materials Transportation Act; Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CalOSHA), and the state Unified Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Management Regulatory Program. As a result, routine transport and use of hazardous materials during construction would be less than significant. Operation The Project involves operation of 37 new two-story dwelling units and central common open space, which involve routinely using hazardous materials including solvents, cleaning agents, paints, pesticides, batteries, fertilizers, and aerosol cans. These types of materials are not acutely hazardous and would only be used and stored in limited quantities. The normal routine use of these hazardous materials products pursuant to existing regulations would not result in a significant hazard to people or the environment in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, operation of the Project would not result in a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous waste, and impacts would be less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less than Significant Impact. Construction Accidental Releases. While the routine use, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials in accordance with applicable regulations during construction activities would not pose health risks or result in significant impacts; improper use, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes could result in accidental spills or releases, posing health risks to workers, the public, and the environment. To avoid an impact related to an accidental release, the use of best management practices (BMPs) during construction would be implemented as part of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Construction Permit (and included as PPP WQ-1). Implementation of an SWPPP would minimize potential adverse effects to workers, the public, and the environment. Construction contract specifications would include strict on-site handling rules and BMPs that include, but are not limited to: • Establishing a dedicated area for fuel storage and refueling and construction dewatering activities that includes secondary containment protection measures and spill control supplies; Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 63 • Following manufacturers’ recommendations on the use, storage, and disposal of chemical products used in construction; • Avoiding overtopping construction equipment fuel tanks; • Properly containing and removing grease and oils during routine maintenance of equipment; and • Properly disposing of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals. Historical On-Site Agricultural Use. The Project site was used for agricultural uses from approximately 1928 through the 1950’s. Application of pesticide and herbicide is considered likely to have occurred during this time period, potentially resulting in the accumulation of pesticides and metals common with herbicide application in shallow soils at the site. Therefore, the former agricultural activity on the site was considered a REC by the Phase I ESA (Phase I 2021). In response to the potential accumulation of pesticides and herbicides in the soil onsite and the REC identified in the Phase I ESA, Stantec oversaw the excavation and removal of approximately 300 cubic yards of impacted soil on March 28, 2022. The excavation removed soil that was contaminated with chlordane to below screening levels to a maximum depth of 5 feet below ground surface (bgs). Post remediation site-wide chlordane levels were reported below screening levels (Excavation 2022). As such, no further action with respect to chlordane impacts in soil is warranted as impacts were reduced to levels that are less than significant. Additionally, the shallow soil investigation recommended in the Phase I ESA is no longer warranted as contaminated soils have been removed. Therefore, construction of the Project would not result in a significant hazard to the environment, residents, or workers in the vicinity of the Project site and impacts would be less than significant. Operation As described previously, operation of the proposed 37 two-story dwelling units and related site improvements includes use of limited hazardous materials, such as solvents, cleaning agents, paints, pesticides, batteries, fertilizers, and aerosol cans. Normal routine use of typical residential products pursuant to existing regulations would not result in a significant hazard to the environment, residents, or workers in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less than Significant Impact. There are no existing or proposed schools within one-quarter mile of the Project site. The closest schools to the site are Emma W. Shuey Elementary School located 0.27 mile to the southwest, Muscatel Middle School located 0.38 mile to the southeast, Rosemead High School located 0.45 mile to the west, and Gabrielino High School located 0.58 mile southwest. As described previously, construction and operation of the Project would involve the use, storage, and disposal of small amounts of hazardous materials on the Project site. These hazardous materials would be limited and used and disposed of in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations, which would reduce the potential for accidental release into the environment near a school. The emissions that would be generated from construction and operation of the Project were evaluated in the air quality analysis discussed above, and the emissions generated from the Project would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the federal or state air quality standards. Thus, the Project would not emit hazardous or handle acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste near a school, and impacts would be less than significant. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 64 d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. According to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor database, and the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the site (Phase 1 2021) the Project site is not located on or nearby any hazardous material sites listed, pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. As a result, impacts related to hazards from being located on or adjacent to a hazardous materials site would not occur from implementation of the proposed Project. e) For a Project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the Project area? No Impact. The Project site is not within two miles of an airport. The closest airport is the San Gabriel Valley Airport, which is 2.5 miles east of the Project site. The Project site is not located within any land use compatibility zone for the nearest airport, nor is it within an airport safety zone (ALUC 2022). Therefore, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project areas, and no impacts would occur. f) Impair implementation of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less than Significant Impact. Construction The proposed construction activities, including equipment and supply staging and storage, would occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site or adjacent areas. During construction of the Project driveway, Mission Drive would remain open to ensure adequate emergency access to the Project area and vicinity. Impacts related to interference with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan during construction activities would be less than significant. Operation Operation of the proposed Project would not result in a physical interference with an emergency response evacuation. Direct access to the Project site would be provided from Mission Drive, which is a 4-lane minor arterial roadway that is adjacent to the Project site. The Project is also required to design and construct internal access and provide fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants and sprinklers) in conformance with the City Municipal Code and the Fire Department prior to approval to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant to the requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9) and the Fire Code included per Municipal Code Chapter 8.24). As a result, the proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant. g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 65 No Impact. According to the California Fire Hazard Severity Zones mapping and Figure 12.5, Fire Hazard Severity Zones Policy Map, of the Los Angeles County General Plan, the City of Rosemead (including the Project site) is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is located within an urbanized area and development of the site with residential uses would not result in impacts related to the exposure of people or structures to loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to hazards and hazardous materials that are applicable to the Project. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to hazards and hazardous materials are required. Sources Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor Database (Envirostor): Available: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ LA County’s Airport Land Use Commission Site: Available: https://lacounty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=acf2e87194a54af9b266 bf07547f240a Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning (Los Angeles County 2015). General Plan 2035. Figure 12.5, Fire Hazard Severity Zones Policy Map. Adopted October 6, 2015. Available at: https://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/Project/gp_2035_2021-FIG_12- 5_Fire_Hazard_Severity_Zones_Policy_Map_Responsibility.pdf Stantec. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I 2021) (Appendix F). Stantec. Remedial Excavation Completion Report (Excavation 2022) (Appendix G). Cal Fire. California Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). Available: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 66 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the Project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) impede or redirect flood flows? d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to Project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? The discussion below is based on the Preliminary Hydrology Study and Low Impact Development Plan, 2022. Prepared by C&V Consulting Inc. (Appendix H and I). a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 67 Less Than Significant Impact. Construction Construction of the Project would require grading and excavation of soils, which would loosen sediment, and then have the potential to mix with surface water runoff and degrade water quality. Additionally, construction would require the use of heavy equipment and construction-related chemicals, such as concrete, cement, asphalt, fuels, oils, antifreeze, transmission fluid, grease, solvents and paints. Without implementation of a SWPPP, these potentially harmful materials could be accidentally spilled or improperly disposed of during construction and, if mixed with surface water runoff, could wash into and pollute waters. These types of water quality impacts during construction of the Project would be prevented through implementation of a SWPPP. Construction of the Project would disturb more than one acre of soil; therefore, the proposed Project would be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity. Construction activity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading, and ground disturbances such as trenching, stockpiling, or excavation. The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a SWPPP that is required to identify all potential sources of pollution that are reasonably expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges from the construction site. The SWPPP would generally contain a site map showing the construction perimeter, proposed buildings, stormwater collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the site, and adjacent roadways. The SWPPP would also include construction BMPs. Adherence to the existing requirements and implementation of the appropriate BMPs as ensured through the City’s plan check and permitting process are included as PPP WQ-1, which would ensure that the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, potential water quality degradation associated with construction activities would be minimized, and impacts would be less than significant. Operation The new residential uses would introduce pollutants such as, chemicals from household cleaners, nutrients from fertilizer, pesticides and sediments from landscaping, domestic trash and debris, and oil and grease from vehicles without implementation of a WQMP. These pollutants could potentially discharge into surface waters and result in degradation of water quality. Thus, the Project would be required to comply with existing regulations that limit the potential for pollutants to discharge from the site. Chapter 13.16 of the City’s Municipal Code (and PPP WQ-2) requires implementation of a WQMP based on the anticipated pollutants that could result from the Project. The BMP would include pollutant source control features and pollutant treatment control features. Project drainage on the site would include onsite catch basins, infiltration systems, and a detention pipe system to capture and treat stormwater. Stormwater runoff would be conveyed via proposed onsite gutter and directed to a curb inlet. Two additional catch basins would be located along the center of the Project site to convey stormwater into the underground storm drain system. All onsite catch basins would be connected by storm drainpipes to the drywell infiltration system for water quality treatment. With implementation of the WQMP, pursuant to the City Municipal Code, (included as PPP WQ-2); which would be verified during the plan check and permitting process for the proposed Project, the Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 68 proposed Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, and impacts would be less than significant. b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project currently receives water from the California American Water-Los Angeles District that receives a portion of the district’s water supply from the Baldwin Hills Central Basin, San Marino Raymond Basin, Duarte Main San Gabriel Basin, and San Marino Main San Gabriel Basin. The Basin adjudicated and water extractions are managed by the Water District, which regulates the amount of groundwater pumped from the Basin and sets the Basin Production Percentage for all pumpers. In addition, the Project would receive water supplies through the City’s water supply and would not extract groundwater. As described in the previous response, the Project would include onsite catch basins, infiltration systems, and a detention pipe system to capture and treat stormwater. Stormwater runoff would be conveyed via proposed onsite gutter and directed to a curb inlet. Two additional catch basins would be located along the center of the Project site to convey stormwater into the underground storm drain system. All onsite catch basins would be connected by storm drainpipes to the drywell infiltration system for water quality treatment. The Project would implement water efficient plumbing fixtures and would comply with the CalGreen Plumbing Code along with installing a water efficient landscape irrigation system. Thus, the proposed Project would implement groundwater recharge through onsite infiltration, and Project interference with groundwater recharge or groundwater management would not occur from the Project. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site does not contain, nor is adjacent to, a stream, river, creek, or other flowing water body. Thus, impacts related to alteration of the course of a stream or river would not occur. The Project site is relatively flat and would drain into the internal stormwater system proposed. Construction Construction of the Project would require grading and excavation of soils, which would loosen sediment and could result in erosion or siltation. However, as described previously, construction of the proposed Project requires City approval of a SWPPP prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer, as included by PPP WQ-1. The SWPPP is required during the City’s plan check and permitting process and would include construction BMPs to reduce erosion or siltation. Typical BMPs for erosion or siltation, include use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, gravel bags, stabilized construction driveway, and stockpile management (as described in the previous above). Adherence to the existing requirements and implementation of the required BMPs per the plan check and permitting process would ensure that erosion and siltation associated with construction activities would be minimized, and impacts would be less than significant. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 69 Operation The Project site is currently disturbed with a partially paved asphalt driveway. The existing condition has 98.5% (3.33 acres) pervious area and 1.5% (0.05 acre) impervious area. After development of the Project, the site would have 14% (0.47 acres) pervious area and 86% (2.91 acres) impervious area. The proposed Project would increase the overall impervious footprint by 84.5% (2.86 acres) However, the Project would maintain the existing drainage patter and install a new onsite stormwater drainage system. Pervious areas onsite would be landscaped and would not generate soils that could erode. In addition, the proposed drainage infrastructure would slow and retain stormwater, which would also limit the potential for erosion or siltation. Also, as described previously, the City requires the Project to implement a WQMP (as included by PPP WQ-2) that would implement BMPs, which reduce erosion and siltation. As a result, stormwater runoff and the potential for erosion and siltation would not increase with implementation of the proposed Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would not alter the existing drainage pattern in the Project area and would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite. Impacts would be less than significant. ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; Less Than Significant Impact. As described in the previous response, the Project site does not contain, nor is adjacent to, a stream, river, creek, or other flowing water body. Thus, impacts related to alteration of the course of a stream or river would not occur. In addition, the proposed Project would be required to implement a SWPPP (included as PPP WQ-1) during construction that would implement BMPs, such as the use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, and gravel bags, that would ensure that runoff would not substantially increase during construction, and flooding on or off-site would not occur. As described previously, after development of the Project, the site would have 14% (0.47 acres) pervious area and 86% (2.91 acres) impervious area. The proposed Project would increase the overall impervious footprint by 84.5% (2.86 acres) However, the Project would implement an operational WQMP (as included by PPP WQ-2) that would install an onsite storm drain system that would include a drywell system and perforated storm drain piping for infiltration. Thus, the Project would not increase the rate or amount of surface runoff, and flooding on or offsite would not occur. Impacts would be less than significant. iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or Less Than Significant Impact. As described in the previous responses, the proposed Project would be required to implement a SWPPP (included as PPP WQ-1) during construction that would implement BMPs, such as the use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, and gravel bags, that would ensure that runoff would not substantially increase during construction, and that pollutants would not discharge from the Project site, which would reduce potential impacts to drainage systems and water quality to a less than significant level. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 70 As described previously, after development of the Project, the site would have 14% (0.47 acres) pervious area and 86% (2.91 acres) impervious area. However, the Project would implement an operational WQMP (included as PPP WQ-2) that would install an onsite storm drain system that would include a drywell system with a filtration system and perforated storm drain piping for infiltration. Thus, operation of the proposed Project would not substantially increase stormwater runoff, and pollutants would be filtered onsite. Impacts related to drainage systems and polluted runoff would be less than significant with implementation of the existing requirements, which would be verified during the plan check and permitting process. iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in Zone A per the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 06037C1675F (FEMA 2022). The site is identified as Zone A because it is located in an area with a 1% annual chance of flooding and a 26% chance of flooding over a 30- year period. Thus, the proposed Project would not impede or redirect flood flows, and impacts would be less than significant. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to Project inundation? No Impact. The Project site is located in Zone A per the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 06037C1675F (FEMA 2022). Thus, the Project would not be located in a flood hazard zone, which would result in release of pollutants due to inundation of the site. A seiche is a surface wave created when an inland body of water is shaken, usually by earthquake activity. The site also is not subject to flooding hazards associated with a seiche because there are no large body of surface water located near the Project site to result in effects related to a seiche, which could result in release in pollutants due to inundation of the site. The Pacific Ocean is located over 23 miles southwest of the Project site; consequently, there is no potential for the Project site to be inundated by a tsunami that could release pollutants. In addition, the Project site is flat and not located near any steep hillsides; therefore, there is no potential for the site to be adversely affected by mudflow. Thus, implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow that could release pollutants due to inundation of the Project site. No impact would occur. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? No Impact. As described previously, the Project would be required to have an approved SWPPP, which would include construction BMPs to minimize the potential for construction related sources of pollution. For operations, the proposed Project would be required to implement source control BMPs to minimize the introduction of pollutants; and treatment control BMPs to treat runoff. With implementation of the operational source and treatment control BMPs that would be required by the City during the Project permitting and approval process (pursuant to PPP WQ-1 and PPP WQ- Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 71 2), potential pollutants would be reduced to the maximum extent feasible, and implementation of the proposed Project would not obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan. As described previously, water supplies are provided by the California American Water Los Angeles County District that extracts water from the Central Basin. Groundwater pumping is regulated through a Basin Production Percentage to ensure the groundwater supply is sustainable. In addition, the Project would not extract groundwater. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in the obstruction or conflict with a groundwater management plan, and impacts would be less than significant. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP WQ-1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16 and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 (MS4 Permit). The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other NPDES regulations to limit the potential of erosion and polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by the City of Rosemead staff to confirm compliance. PPP WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project applicant shall have a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) approved by the City for implementation. The Project shall comply with the City’s Municipal Chapter 13.16 and the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements in effect for the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) at the time of grading permit to control discharges of sediments and other pollutants during operations of the Project. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to hydrology and water quality are required. Sources Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 2022). National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer. Map #06037C1675F. Available at: https://msc.fema.gov/arcgis/rest/directories/arcgisjobs/nfhl_print/mscprintb_gpserver/j299a67 263b93496db1b7e5a6b3385648/scratch/FIRMETTE_b55c63a1-bff0-459b-8eda- e45c330efd55.pdf Preliminary Hydrology Study, 2022. Prepared by C&V Consulting Inc. (Appendix H). Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan, 2022. Prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc. (Appendix I). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 72 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the Project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The physical division of an established community could occur if a major road were built through an established community or neighborhood, or if a major development was built which was inconsistent with the land uses in the community such that it divided the community. The environmental effects caused by such could include lack of a, or disruption of, access to services, schools, or shopping areas. It could also include the creation of blighted buildings or areas due to the division of the community. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped and is surrounded by a roadway to the south followed by single-family residential development and a church, SCE powerlines, a plant nursery, and Walnut Grove Avenue followed by single-family residential to the west, single-family residential and a plant nursery to the north, and single-family residential to the east. The proposed Project would develop the site to provide 37 two-story dwelling units which are consistent with the existing residential development to the east and south of the site across Mission Drive. Therefore, the change of the Project site from vacant and undeveloped to residential would not physically divide an established community. In addition, the Project would not change roadways, or install any infrastructure that would result in a physical division. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to physical division of an established community, and no impact would result. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact. As described previously, the Project site is located adjacent to Mission Drive, residential development, a plant nursery, and a church. The Project would develop the Project site to provide 37 new two-story dwelling units, which would be similar to the residential uses that are located adjacent to, and across the street from the site. General Plan As the site is within an area developed with single-family residences, the site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. The Low Density Residential land use designation is characterized by low-density residential neighborhoods consisting primarily of detached single- family dwellings on individual lots with a maximum permitted density of 7 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 73 the site to Medium Density Residential that allows up to 12 dwelling units per acre. The General Plan Land Use Element states that the Medium Density Residential land use allows for housing types such as single-family detached homes on smaller lots, duplexes, and attached units. As the Project would develop two-story dwelling units in the Medium Density Residential designation at a density of 11 dwelling units per acre, it would be consistent with the proposed land use designations, and the proposed change in land uses would be less than significant. In addition, the Project complies with the policies set forth in the City’s General Plan as shown in Table LU-1, below. Table LU-1: Project Consistency with General Plan Policies City’s General Plan Policies Project Consistency Policy 1.4: Through the Conditional Use Permit process, Design Review process, residential design guidelines, or zoning enforcement, regulate new and large residential structures that compromise neighborhood quality Consistent. The Project has been designed to be consistent with the City’s development standards and reviewed by the City’s planning department to ensure development standards have been met. Policy 1.5: Require that new single-family residential construction, additions, and renovations be designed to protect the privacy of adjacent residential properties and the quality of established neighborhoods. Consistent. As mentioned above, the Project has been designed to be consistent with the City’s development standards and reviewed by the City’s planning department to ensure development standards have been met. Policy 1.6: Where the housing stock and neighborhood design are of high quality, maintain and provide the foundation for strong neighborhood interaction, and ensure that the bulk and mass of new single-family residential buildings or additions be of the same scale as surrounding units within established residential neighborhoods. Consistent. The proposed Project would develop an underutilized parcel and develop 37 two-story dwelling units that would be similar in size and scale to the surrounding residences. Policy 1.7: Foster housing stock and neighborhood revitalization, renovation, and good site/architectural design. Consistent. The Project would develop 37 two-story dwelling units that would have a Spanish Colonial or Hacienda architectural style. Policy 1.8: Require that new single-family units utilize detailed architectural articulations to promote the visual character of neighborhoods and comply with the adopted single family design guidelines. Consistent. As discussed above, the Project would include Spanish Colonial and Hacienda architectural styles. Six color schemes would be utilized which include shades of grey, blue, and brown. The Project would comply with the City’s design standards. Zoning The Project site is currently zoned as R-1 Single-Family Residential, and the Project would change the site’s zoning from R-1 Single-Family Residential to P-D Planned Development to allow for the development of the dwelling units. The P-D zone does not have a maximum building height and does not have a front or side setback when adjoining residential, though a 5 ft or 10% of lot width setback is required. When adjoining residential, there is a 5 ft or 10% of lot width front setback and the Project is required to adopt the side setback of the zone it is abutting. As described previously, in Table AES-1, the proposed Project meets or is within the P-D zoning requirements for building heights and setbacks. Regarding lot size and coverage, the P-D zone allows a minimum lot area of one acre and maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre. As shown in Table AES-1, the Project site is 3.38 net acres which exceeds the net acre minimum. The Project proposes to have a density of 11 dwelling units per acre which is less than the maximum. Thus, the Project site and proposed Project would meet the P-D lot size and coverage standards Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable zoning regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and impacts would be less than significant. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 74 Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to land use and planning that are applicable to the Project. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to land use and planning are required. Sources City of Rosemead. Municipal Code. Available: https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT13 PUSE_CH13.16STWAMA_13.16.010DE City of Rosemead. General Plan. Available: https://cdn5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 75 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the Project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. According to the Special Report 209 from the California Geological Survey, the City of Rosemead is not included in a list of lead agencies in the San Gabriel Valley P-C Region with active mine operations, designated lands, or lands classified as Mineral Resource Zone 2 (MRZ-2) within its jurisdiction (CGS 2010). Therefore, development of the site would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. No impact would occur. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on the general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. As described above, the Project site is not located within a region of known mineral significance. The site has a General Plan designation of Low Density Residential, is in an urban and developed area, and does not support mineral extraction activities onsite. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of locally important mineral resources, and impacts would not occur. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to mineral resources that are applicable to the Project. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to mineral resources are required. Sources California Geological Survey (CGS 2010), Special Report 209, Update of Mineral Land Classification for Portland Cement Concrete-Grade Aggregate in the San Gabriel Valley Production-Consumption Region, Los Angeles County, California, 2010. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 76 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 13. NOISE. Would the Project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) For a Project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? The discussion below is based on the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis prepared by LSA, Inc. (Noise 2022) (Appendix J). Noise Element of the General Plan The City of Rosemead General Plan addresses noise in its Noise Element (General Plan 2010). The Noise Element contains goals and policies for noise control and abatement in the City. General noise goals for Rosemead aim to attain a healthier and quieter environment for all citizens while maintaining a reasonable level of economic progress and development. The City, consistent with the California Office of Planning and Research, has established land use compatibility guidelines for determining acceptable noise levels for specified land uses as shown in Table N-1. These land use compatibility guidelines are intended to be an advisory resource when considering changes in land use and policies, such as zoning modifications. The Issues, Goals, and Policies as well as the Implementation Actions in the City’s General Plan Noise Element are designed to provide noise- compatible land use relationships by establishing noise standards utilized for design and siting purposes and minimize noise impacts from significant noise generators. The following goals and policies are applicable to the proposed Project: Goal 1: Effective incorporation of noise considerations into land use planning decisions. • Policy 1.1: Ensure compliance with standards for interior and exterior noise established within the Noise Element and Zoning Code. • Policy 1.4: Encourage acoustical design in new construction • Policy 1.5: Require sound walls to be constructed in designated mixed-use districts where noise-sensitive land uses are located on adjacent properties. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 77 Goal 3: Effective implementation of measures to control non-transportation noise impacts. • Action 1.2: Incorporate noise reduction features during site planning to mitigate anticipated noise impacts on affected noise sensitive land uses. The noise contours, illustrated on the Existing Noise Contours Map, identify areas within the City exposed to noise levels greater than 60dB CNEL and shall be used to identify locations of potential conflict. Require acoustical analyses, as appropriate, for proposed residential development within the 60 dB CNEL or higher contour. New developments will be permitted only if appropriate mitigation measures are included. • Action 1.3: Enforce provisions of the California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24) that specify that indoor noise levels for multi-family residential living spaces shall not exceed 45 dB CNEL. The standard is defined as the combined effect of all noise sources, and is implemented when existing or future exterior noise levels exceed 60 dB CNEL. Title 24 further requires that the standard be applied to all new hotels, motels, apartment houses, and dwellings other than detached single-family dwellings. The City will additionally apply the standard to single-family dwellings and condominium conversion Projects. Table N-1: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 78 Source: General Plan, 2010. Municipal Code Chapter 8.36.030 of the City’s Municipal Code limits construction and demolition activities to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Construction activities should not take place at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. No person shall operate or allow the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, or alteration or demolition work outside of these hours to prevent noise disturbances. Chapter 8.36.060 of the City’s Municipal Code, Noise Standards, establishes limits on non-impulsive noise where no person shall maintain, create, operate, or cause noise on private property to not exceed the noise standards shown in Table D. The standards are applicable to all receptor properties within a designated noise zone. This section also establishes an allowable interior noise level of 45 dBA at all residential receptors during anytime of the day. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 79 Table N-2: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels Noise Zone Type of Land Use (Receptor Property) Time Interval Allowable Exterior Noise Level (dBA) I Single-, double- or multiple family residential Daytime 60 Nighttime 45 II Commercial Daytime 65 Nighttime 60 III Industrial or manufacturing Anytime 70 Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J) Federal Transit Administration The construction noise threshold from Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2018), identifies a significant construction noise impact if construction noise exceeds the thresholds exceed the dBA in Table N-3 at the nearby sensitive receivers (e.g., residential, etc.). Table N-3: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels Land Use Daytime 1-hour Leq (dBA) Nighttime 1-hour Leq (dBA) Residential 90 80 Commercial 100 100 Industrial 100 100 Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J) Vibration standards included in the FTA manual are used in this analysis for ground-borne vibration impacts on human annoyance and potential damage. Table F provides the criteria for assessing the potential for interference or annoyance from vibration levels in a building. The criteria for annoyance impacts resulting from ground-borne vibration and noise are based on the average vibration levels during construction. Table N-4 provides the criteria for assessing the potential for damage from vibration levels generated during construction to surrounding structures. Table N-5 below states the construction vibration damage criteria from the FTA. Table N-4: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis Land Use Max Lv (VdB) Description of Use Workshop 90 Vibration that is distinctly felt. Appropriate for workshops and similar areas not as sensitive to vibration Office 84 Vibration can be felt. Appropriate for offices and similar areas not as sensitive to vibration. Residential Day 78 Vibration that is barely felt. Adequate for computer equipment and low-power optical microscopes. Residential Night and Operating Rooms 72 Vibration is not felt, but ground- borne noise may be audible inside quiet rooms. Suitable for medium- power microscopes and other equipment of low sensitivity. Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J) Table N-5: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria Building Category PPV (in/sec) Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster) 0.50 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 80 Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.30 Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.20 Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J) Existing Noise Levels As detailed in the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Appendix F), to identify the existing ambient noise level environment, two 24-hour noise level measurements and one short-term noise level measurement were taken on the Project site (shown on Figure 9) between June 21, 2022 and June 22, 2022. The measured sound levels in dBA have been used to calculate the minimum and maximum Leq averaged over 1-hour intervals. Table N-6 also shows the hourly noise levels (Leq) and daily noise levels (CNEL), based on the entire measurement time. As shown in Table N-6, existing noise levels on the Project site range from 50.6 to 57.0 dBA CNEL. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 81 Table N-6: Summary of 24-Hour Ambient Noise Level Measurements Location Site Description Daytime Noise Levels (dBA Leq) Evening Noise Levels (dBA Leq) Nighttime Noise Levels(dBA Leq) Average Daily Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) LT-1 Southeastern corner of Project site, on a fence along the backyard of 8623 Mission Drive. 50.9-62.5 49.2-56.1 42.6-52.1 57.0 LT-2 Western corner of Project site, bordering a power line near a fence next to a power line tower. 47.6-59.8 45.4-54.3 41.9-50.7 55.2 ST-1 Northeast corner of Project site, south of 8612 Zerelda Street. 43.0-55.2 40.8-49.7 37.3-46.1 50.6 Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J) a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Construction The construction activities for the proposed Project are anticipated to include demolition of the partially paved driveway, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Construction of the proposed Project would occur over an 11-month period. Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed Project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment have the potential to range from approximately 73 dBA to 95 dBA at 50 feet in distance, as shown on Table N-7. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 82 This page intentionally left blank. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 83 Figure 9: Noise Measurement Locations Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 84 This page intentionally left blank. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 85 Table N-7: Construction Activity Noise Levels at 50 Feet Equipment Description Acoustical Use Factor1 (percent) Maximum Noise Level at 50 Ft2 (Lmax) Auker Drill Rig 20 84 Backhoes 40 80 Compactor (Ground) 20 80 Compressor 40 80 Cranes 16 85 Dozer 40 85 Dump truck 40 84 Excavators 40 85 Flat Bed Trucks 40 84 Forklift 20 85 Front-end Loaders 40 80 Graders 40 85 Impact Pile Drivers 20 95 Jackhammers 20 85 Paver 50 77 Pickup Truck 40 55 Pneumatic Tools 50 85 Pumps 50 77 Rock Drills 20 85 Rollers 20 85 Scrapers 40 85 Tractors 40 84 Trencher 50 80 Welder 40 73 Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis (Appendix F) Per the City’s Noise Ordinance, the Project would comply with the construction hours specified which states that the construction activities are allowed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays. The proposed Project’s construction activities would occur pursuant to these regulations, which is included as PPP NOI-1 and would be detailed in the construction permits. Therefore, Project construction would be compliant with the City’s noise related standards and impacts related to standards would be less than significant. Neither the City’s General Plan nor Municipal Code establish numeric maximum acceptable construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow for a quantified determination of what CEQA constitutes a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase. Thus, the construction noise thresholds from the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2018), have been utilized, which identifies a significant construction noise impact if construction noise exceeds 90 dBA at sensitive receptors. The nearest sensitive receptors to the Project site are the single-family residences located to the east, approximately 115 feet from the property line. Modeling of the construction noise to the location of the existing sensitive receptors is summarized in Table N-8, which shows that construction noise at the closest sensitive receptors is anticipated to range from 69 dBA Leq to 81 dBA Leq, which is less than the 90 dBA threshold. Therefore, noise impacts would be less than significant. In addition, the construction noise over the 11-month period would be temporary in nature as the operation of each piece of construction equipment would not be constant throughout the construction day, and equipment would be turned off when not in use. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 86 The typical operating cycle for a piece of construction equipment involves one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three or four minutes at lower power settings. Table N-8: Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptors Receptor (Location) Composite Noise Level (dBA Leq) at 50 feet Distance (feet) Composite Noise Level (dBA Leq) Residences (East) 88 115 81 Residences (West) 350 71 Residences (North) 350 71 Residences (South) 430 69 Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis (Appendix F) Overall, as temporary construction activity would occur in compliance with the City’s regulations and would be less than the noise level threshold at existing sensitive receptors, impacts related to construction noise would be less than significant. Operation The proposed Project would result in the operation of 37 two-story dwelling units. Potential noise impacts associated with the Project would be from Project-generated vehicular traffic on the nearby roadways. In addition, the proposed development would be adjacent to Mission Drive and in close proximity to Walnut Grove Avenue, which may create exterior and interior noise levels in excess of City standards at the proposed residences. Once the proposed residences are constructed and inhabited, noise levels generated at the project site would occur from stationary equipment such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units that would be installed for the new development, internal street and driveway vehicle movements, trash removal activity, and activity at outdoor gathering areas. Typical noise levels from onsite operations at 50 feet from the noise source include the following: • Air Conditioning Unit: 54.4 dBA • Trash Enclosure Activity: 49.0 dBA • Parking Lot Vehicle Movements: 33.5 dBA • Outdoor Community Recreation Activity: 48.7 dBA Typically, air conditioning units and trash enclosures are located away from sensitive receivers and shielded to ensure that noise from operation of the units and trash pickup does not have the potential to result in an impact. The project would not result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the City Noise Ordinance or the General Plan Noise Element. Vehicular Noise. Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust and tires. The level of traffic noise depends on three primary factors (1) the volume of traffic, (2) the speed of traffic, and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of traffic. The proposed Project is a residential Project that would not result in a substantial number of truck trips and the proposed Project would not alter the speed limit on any existing roadway so the proposed Project’s potential offsite noise impacts have been focused on the noise impacts associated with the change of volume of traffic that would occur with development of the proposed Project. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 87 The trip generation prepared for the Project determined that the Project would generate 349 average daily trips. The expected traffic volume on the adjacent segment of Mission drive could be as low as 15,000 (City of Rosemead General Plan 2010). The results of the Noise Analysis determined that an increase of approximately 0.1 dBA CNEL is expected along the streets adjacent to the Project site. A noise increase of less than 1 dBA would not be perceptible to the human ear. Therefore, the traffic noise increase in the vicinity of the Project site resulting from the proposed Project would be less than significant. Exterior Noise. The City has a 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standard. Based on the monitoring results shown in Table N-6, the existing measured noise levels at the Project site closest to Mission Drive, approximately 95 feet away from Mission Drive centerline, is 57.0 dBA CNEL. Based on the Project site plan, the rear yards of units 1-4 and 37 are approximately 45 feet away from Mission Drive centerline, resulting in estimated noise levels approaching 62 dBA, without accounting for shielding provided by the proposed 6ft wall, which would reduce the noise levels by 5 dBA or more, resulting in noise levels below 60 dBA. Thus, Thus, impacts would be less than significant. Interior Noise. As described in the Noise Impact Analysis, per the California Code of Regulations and the City’s Implementation Actions, an interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL or less is required for all noise-sensitive rooms. Based on the expected future exterior noise levels at the façades of the lots closest to Mission Drive approaching 62 dBA CNEL, a minimum noise reduction of 17 dBA would be required. Based on reference information from transmission loss test reports for various Milgard windows (Milgard 2008), standard building construction along with standard windows, typically in the STC 25- 28 range, a reduction of 25 dBA or more would be achieved with windows in a closed position. With a reduction of 25 dBA or more, interior noise levels would remain below the City’s interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL. The Project includes a HVAC system for all unit so that windows can remained closed. Thus, the Project would not generation a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The City does not have quantified vibration standards applicable to the proposed Project. However, the FTA provides criteria for assessing the potential for interference or annoyance from vibration levels in a building as shown in Table N-4. Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment used on the site. Operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Buildings in the vicinity of the construction site respond to these vibrations with varying results ranging from no perceptible effects at the low levels to slight damage at the highest levels. Table N-9 provides vibration levels for particular construction activities at a distance of 25 feet. Table N-9: Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment at 25 Feet Equipment Peak Particle Velocity (inches/second) Approximate Vibration Level (Lv)at 25 feet Pile Driver (Impact), Typical 0.644 104 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 88 Pile Driver (Sonic), Typical 0.170 93 Vibratory Roller 0.210 94 Hoe Ram 0.089 87 Large Bulldozer 0.089 87 Caisson Drilling 0.089 87 Loaded Trucks 0.076 86 Jackhammer 0.035 79 Small Bulldozer 0.003 58 Source: Noise Impact Analysis (Appendix F). The primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of a pile driver. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest offsite sensitive receptors (single-family residences to the east) would be 0.995 inch per second PPV when construction occurs at the property line, which would exceed the 0.2 inch per second PPV threshold detailed above. Therefore, Mitigation Measure NOI-1 is included to prohibit the use of heavy equipment within 15 feet of existing residences to the north and west to ensure that vibration levels are below the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold. Thus, with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1, impacts related to construction vibration would be less than significant. c) For a Project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no airports within two miles of the Project site. The closest airport is the San Gabriel Valley Airport that is located 2.6 miles east of the Project site. Similarly, the Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels related to an airstrip. No impacts related to airport or airstrip noise would occur from implementation of the Project. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP NOI-1: Construction Hours. Per Municipal Code Chapter 8.36, construction and demolition activities may only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Construction activities should not take place at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. No person shall operate or allow the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, or alteration or demolition work outside of these hours to prevent noise disturbances. PPP NOI-2: Best Construction Practices. In addition to compliance with the City’s Municipal Code allowed hours of construction of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays, the following recommendations would reduce construction noise to the extent feasible: • The Project construction contractor should equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers, consistent with manufacturer’s standards. • The Project construction contractor should locate staging areas away from off-site sensitive uses during the later phases of Project development. • The Project construction contractor should place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the Project site whenever feasible. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 89 Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Construction Vibration. Project plans and specifications shall include the requirement that that operation of any heavy equipment shall be prohibited within 15 feet of existing residences to the north and east. If heavy equipment is necessary within 15 feet of existing structures, the following measures shall be implemented. • Identify structures that could be affected by ground-borne vibration and would be located within 15 feet of where heavy construction equipment would be used. This task shall be conducted by a qualified structural engineer as approved by the City’s Director of Community Development or designee. • Develop a vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan for approval by the City’s Director of Community Development, or designee, to identify structures where monitoring would be conducted; set up a vibration monitoring schedule; define structure-specific vibration limits; and address the need to conduct photo, elevation, and crack surveys to document before and after construction conditions. Construction contingencies such as alternative methods or equipment that would generate lower vibration levels would be identified for when vibration levels approached the limits. • At a minimum, monitor vibration during initial demolition activities. Monitoring results may indicate the need for more intensive measurements if vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold. • When vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) limit, suspend construction and implement contingencies identified in the approved vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan to either lower vibration levels or secure the affected structures. Sources Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis prepared by LSA. (Noise 2022) (Appendix F). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 90 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the Project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would construct 37 two-story dwelling units on the Project site. The California Department of Finance (CDF) data details that the City of Rosemead had a residential population of 50,025 and 15,001 residential units in 2022. Of these, 11,257 (57 percent) are single-family detached units, and 1,437 are attached units (9.6 percent). The CDF data details that 14,505 of the units are occupied (households) and that the vacancy rate within the City is 3.3 percent. In addition, it is estimated that the City has an average of 3.45 persons per household. Based on this information, the proposed 37 two-story dwelling units would result in an increase of approximately 128 new residents. The addition of 128 new residents would represent a population increase of 1.2 percent and the new housing units would result in a 0.256 percent increase in residential units within the City. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Demographics and Growth Forecast (SCAG 2020) anticipates a City population of 60,300 in year 2045, which is an increase of 10,275 persons over the year 2022 population; and forecasts 16,500 households in the City in year 2045, which is an increase of 1,499 residential units over the number of units in 2022. The 37 residential units developed by the proposed Project would equate to 2.47 percent of the forecasted growth in residential units, which is a limited amount of the Projected growth in residential housing. Thus, the Project would not directly result in substantial unplanned growth. Also, the proposed Project is located in an urbanized residential area of the City and is surrounded by residential, park, plant nursery, and church uses and is already served by the existing roadways and infrastructure systems. No infrastructure would be extended or constructed to serve areas beyond the Project site, and indirect impacts related to growth would not occur from implementation of the proposed Project. Therefore, potential impacts related to inducement of unplanned population growth, either directly or indirectly, would be less than significant. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 91 No Impact. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped and does not contain any housing. The Project would develop the site to construct 37 two-story dwelling units. No people or housing would be displaced by implementation of the proposed Project. Conversely, housing would be developed by the Project. Thus, no impact would occur. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to population and housing are applicable to the Project. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to population and housing are required. Sources California Department of Finance. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2020-2022. Accessed: https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5- population-and-housing-estimates-for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2022/ Southern California Association of Governments Demographics and Growth Forecast. Table 14 Jurisdiction-Level Growth Forecast, September 2020. Accessed: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and- growth-forecast.pdf?1606001579 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 92 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a) Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? Fire Protection – Less than Significant Impact. The Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) currently provides services to the Project site and surrounding area. LAFD has two fire stations that provide services to the Project site, including fire prevention and suppression, emergency medical services, technical rescue, and hazardous materials response. The closest fire station to the Project site is Fire Station 42, located at 9319 E. Valley Blvd, which is approximately 1.1 mile southeast of the site. Fire Station 4, located at 2644 N San Gabriel Blvd, which is approximately 2.4 miles southwest of the Project site. Station 4 responded to 3,218 incidents in fiscal year 2021-2022 with an arrival time within five minutes for 48.34% of calls. Station 42 responded to 2,815 incidents in fiscal year 2021-2022 with an arrival time within five minutes for 45.01% of calls.1 1 Data received from Gina Cortez, Los Angeles County Fire Department Planning Division Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 93 The proposed Project would develop 37 residential dwelling units. Implementation of the Project would be required to adhere to California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9 of the California Code of Regulations) included in Section 8.24.010 of the City’s Municipal Code, which regulates fire-resistant construction, emergency planning, fire protection system, and appropriate emergency access throughout the site. As part of the permitting process, the Project plans would be reviewed by the City’s Building and Safety Division to ensure that the fire protection requirements are met. Due to the small increase in onsite people that would occur from implementation of the Project, an incremental increase in demand for fire protection and emergency medical services would occur. However, the increase in residents onsite is limited (128 residents) and would not increase demands such that the existing two fire stations would not be able to accommodate servicing the Project in addition to its existing commitments. Provision of a new or physically altered fire station would not be required that could cause environmental impacts. Therefore, impacts related to fire protection services from the proposed Project would be less than significant. Police Protection - Less than Significant Impact. The Los Angeles County Sheriff Department (LASD) provides policing services for the City of Rosemead. The Temple City Station is located at 8838 E Las Tunas Drive, approximately 1.6 miles northeast of the Project site. Approximately 176 sworn and 33 non-sworn support personnel are assigned to the City2. Based on the CDF population data for the City in January, 2022 of 50,511, the City has approximately 3.5 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. Development of the proposed 37 residential dwelling units would result in an incremental increase in demands on law enforcement services. However, the increase would not be significant when compared to the current demand levels. As described previously, the residential population of the Project site at full occupancy would be approximately 128 residents and based on the Police Department’s staffing of 3.5 officers per thousand population, the proposed Project would require 0.45 percent of an additional officer. Since the need by the Project is less than one full-time officer at the existing staffing ratio, the Project would not require the construction or expansion of the City’s existing policing facilities. Thus, substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or expanded facilities would not occur. Thus, impacts related to police services would be less than significant. Schools – Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in Rosemead School District (K-8) and El Monte Union High School District (9-12). The public schools that serve the Project site are: • Emma W. Shuey Elementary School (K-6) • Muscatel Middle School (7-8) • Rosemead High School (9-12) 2 Data received from Deputy Marshall Los Angeles Sheriff Department Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 94 Table PS-1: School Capacity and Project Generated Students School 2021-2022 Enrollment 2020-2021 Enrollment1 2019- 2020 2018- 2019 2017- 2018 2016- 2017 2015- 2016 Emma W. Shuey Elementary School 514 460 486 491 477 498 516 Muscatel Middle School 555 569 556 570 621 660 654 Rosemead High School 1,704 1,787 1,806 1,844 1,847 1,813 1,805 1 Source: California Department of Education, Accessed: https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ The State Office of Public School Construction utilizes a student yield factor of 0.7 students per dwelling unit. Using this factor, the proposed 37 residences could result in approximately 26 new students that would range in age from elementary through high school. The 26 students would range in age from elementary school to high school. As shown in Table PS-1 above, Muscatel Middle School and Rosemead High School are operating at less capacity than previous years. Rosemead School District is currently at 78% of its capacity with room to accommodate 892 more students. Thus, the addition of 26 students would be accommodated by the schools existing capacities. In addition, as required by all Projects within the City, the proposed Project is required to pay School Mitigation Impact fees, as included by PPP PS-1. Therefore, impacts related to schools would be less than significant. Parks – Less than Significant Impact. The City of Rosemead has approximately 43.25 acres of parkland. In addition, the Whittier Narrows Recreational Area is immediately southeast of the City and provides an additional 1,092 acres of parkland. Of this parkland, 19.5 acres are within 1 mile of the Project site. • Guess Park located which is approximately 300 feet from the Project site. This park is 0.25 acre and consists of a greenbelt. • Sally Tanner Park which is approximately 0.4 mile from the Project site. This park is 1.25 acres and consists of a playground, pathways, benches, and picnic tables. • Rosemead Park which is approximately 0.7 mile from the Project site. This park is 18 acres and consists of a skate park, picnic tables, a swimming pool, and playground. The Project would develop 37 residential dwelling units and 1,664 SF of central common open space for use by residents. There’s an additional 15,654 SF of common open space throughout the Project site that would be used for active recreation. Thus, the Project proposes a total of 17,318 SF of open space recreation area on the site for use by residents. As described previously, approximately 128 new residents would occur from the proposed Project. Due to the limited increase in population from implementation of the Project and provision of onsite open space and recreational facilities, the Project would not require the construction or expansion of any existing park facility. Thus, substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or expanded facilities would not occur. In addition, the impacts of development of the proposed 17,318 square foot open space recreation area on the site are considered part of the impacts of the proposed Project as a whole and are Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 95 analyzed throughout the various sections of this MND. For example, activities such as excavation, grading, and construction as required for the park are analyzed in the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, and Transportation Sections. Other Public Facilities – Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would develop the Project site with 37 residential dwelling units within an area that already contains residential land uses. The additional residences would result in a limited incremental increase in the need for additional services, such as public libraries and post offices, etc. Because the Project area is already served by other services and the Project would result in a limited increase in population, the Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to provide other services, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP PS-1: School Fees. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide payment of the appropriate fees set forth by the applicable school districts related to the funding of school facilities pursuant to Government Code Section 65995 et seq. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to public services are required. Sources California Department of Education Data Quest. Accessed: https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/dataquest.asp City of Rosemead Municipal Code. Accessed: https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT13 PUSE_CH13.16STWAMA_13.16.010DE Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Temple Sheriff’s Station. Accessed: https://lasd.org/temple/ Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 96 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 16. RECREATION. a) Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would develop 37 two-story dwelling units and 17,298 square feet of common open space that would be provided throughout the development for recreational use by residents. Therefore, some of the Project’s park and recreational demand would be met by the provision of the onsite facilities. The City currently has approximately 43.25 acres of park and recreation facilities. Additionally, Whittier Narrows, a regional park, is located just outside Rosemead City limits in unincorporated Los Angeles County and is greater than 1,000 acres in size. The Project site is within one mile of 20.25 acres of parkland including Guess Park located directly east of the site, across Walnut Grove Avenue. As described previously in the population discussion, the approximately 128 new residents would equate to approximately 3 new residents per acre of park and recreational area that is within one mile of the site. Due to the limited increase in population from implementation of the Project, provision of onsite open space and recreational facilities, and the amount of existing recreation facilities near the site, impacts related to the increase in the use of existing parks and recreational facilities, such that physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated would be less than significant. b) Include or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less than Significant Impact. As described above, the Project includes 17,298 square feet of open space recreation area. The impacts of development of the park are considered part of the impacts of the proposed Project as a whole and are analyzed throughout the various sections of this MND. For example, activities such as excavation, grading, and construction as required for the recreation area are analyzed in the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, and Transportation Sections. Also, as described in the previous response, the approximately 128 new residents would equate to approximately 3 new residents per existing acre of park and recreational area that is within one mile of the site. Thus, the Project would have a limited increase in use of existing public recreation Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 97 facilities and would not require the construction or expansion of other recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. As a result, impacts would be less than significant. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to recreation are applicable to the Project. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to recreation are required. Sources City of Rosemead General Plan. Accessed: https://cdn5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 98 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 17. TRANSPORTATION. Would the Project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? The discussion below is based on the Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis prepared EPD Solutions, Inc. (Traffic 2022) (Appendix K) a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site would develop 3.378 acres of land with a new residential development that would provide haul truck access during construction and vehicular access during operation. Access would be provided via Mission Drive. The Project proposes a 20- foot-wide entry driveway and 20-foot-wide exit driveway along Mission Drive. Roadway: Construction activities associated with the Project would generate vehicular trips from construction workers traveling to and from the Project site, delivery of construction supplies and import materials to, and export of debris from, the Project site. However, these activities would only occur for an estimated time period of 11 months. The increase of trips during construction activities would be limited and would not exceed the number of daily operational trips described below. The short-term vehicle trips from construction of the Project would generate less than significant operational impacts to roadways. Construction activities of the Project would generate vehicular trips from construction workers traveling to and from Project site, delivery of construction supplies and import materials to, and export of debris from the Project site. However, these activities would only occur for a period of 11 months. Construction of the proposed Project would require 56 haul trips that would occur over the 11-month period. Bicycle: The Project site and surrounding area do not currently support bicycle infrastructure. However, Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue were defined as potential new bike lanes in the Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 99 City’s General Plan. The proposed Project would not alter or conflict with plans to implement new bike lanes along Mission Drive or Walnut Grove Avenue. Pedestrian Facilities: As previously described, the Project site and surrounding roadways have existing sidewalks.. New sidewalk improvements would be included along Mission Drive to facilitate Project design and access. Therefore, the Project would result in no impacts to pedestrian facilities. The Project would be consistent with the City of Rosemead General Plan Circulation Element and would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less than Significant Impact. Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed by Governor Brown in 2013 and required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to amend the CEQA Guidelines to provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating Transportation impacts. SB 743 specified that the new criteria should promote the reduction of GHG emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks and a diversity of land uses. In response, Section 15064.3 was added to the CEQA Guidelines that became effective on July 1, 2020 and requires that Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) be evaluated for impacts and provides lead agencies with the discretion to choose the most appropriate methodology and thresholds for its evaluation. VMT Screening Thresholds The City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines provides VMT screening thresholds to identify Projects that would be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT and therefore could be screened out from further analysis. If a Project meets one of the following criteria as shown below, then the VMT impact of the Project would be considered less than significant and no further analysis would be required. 1. The project is in a Transit Priority Area (TPA). 2. The project is in a low VMT area. 3. The project proposes one of the following local-serving land uses: • Local-serving retail less than 50,000 sf in size, including: o Gas stations o Banks o Restaurants o Shopping Center • Local serving K-12 school • Local park • Daycare centers • Local-serving hotel (e.g., non-destination hotel) • Student housing projects on or adjacent to a college campus • Local-serving assembly use (places of worship, community organizations) • Community institutions (public libraries, fire stations, local government) Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 100 • Affordable, supportive, or transitional housing • Assisted living facilities • Senior housing (as defined by Housing and Urban Development) • Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the • RTP/SCS (Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy) • Project generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips. This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials: o 11 single family housing units o 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units o 10,000 SF of office o 15,000 SF of light industrial o 63,000 SF of warehousing o 79,000 SF of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse • Public parking garages and public parking lots A portion of the Project site is located within a TPA, however the entire site is not within the TPA. Therefore, the Project does not satisfy Screening Criteria 1. Screening Criteria 2 defines low VMT areas as traffic analysis zones (TAZs) with a total daily VMT/service Population that is 15% less than the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) baseline. If the proposed Project is residential, the Project is considered to screen out if it is located within the Low VMT areas. As stated in the City’s guidelines, projects that are located in areas with predominately similar land uses can utilize the SGCVOG screening tool. To ensure that the project is consistent with the land uses that are evaluated in the project Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) in the SGVCOG screening tool, the socioeconomic data in SCAG model TAZ 22180100 was examined. TAZ 22180100 is bounded by Mission drive on the south, the train tracks on the north, Muscatel Avenue on the east and the Rubio Wash on the west. The north portion of the TAZ is currently developed with employment uses while the south portion (south of Grand) is residential. The 2016 base model includes 515 households with a population of 1,511 persons. The zone also includes 645 employees. Therefore, the project is consistent with both the existing land uses and the land uses evaluated in the SCAG model and therefore the SGVCOG screening tool. Thus, the SGVCOG tool was appropriate to use for the Project. As shown in the Appendix K, the project TAZ 22180100 has a VMT per Service Population of 26.78. The baseline VMT per Service Population is 34.9 percent, therefore a low VMT area would be a TAZ where the VMT per Service Population is 29.67 or lower. As noted previously, the VMT per Service Population of the project TAZ is 26.78 and therefore the project is located in a low VMT area and would meet Screening Criteria 2 – Low VMT Area. Table TR-1 below shows the trip generation for the proposed Project. Table TR-1: Proposed Project Trip Generation Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 101 Source: Trip Generation and VMT Screening Memo (Appendix K) The proposed Project is a residential development within an urbanized area that is served by transit. The Project site is surrounded by other residential uses and is in a low VMT area based on the SGCVCOG screening analysis. Therefore, it is legally presumed to have less than significant VMT impacts, and no further analysis is required. However, we note for informational purposes that as described previously, the Project vicinity receives public transit services from the City of Rosemead through the Rosemead Explorer. The Rosemead Explorer operated Monday through Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekends. The closest stop to the Project site is located near Rosemead High School, approximately 0.7 mile away. Therefore, residents at the site would have direct and convenient to existing local and regional transit services, which would further support the reduction of VMT. The Project would also support pedestrian circulation. As detailed in the previous response, new onsite sidewalks would be developed to connect to currently existing sidewalks that are adjacent to the site along Mission Drive and provide pathways throughout the Project site. This would facilitate pedestrian use and walking to nearby locations, such as the nearby schools and park facilities. Therefore, the Project meets the intent of SB 743 to support multimodal transportation and a diversity of interrelated land uses, such as residential, schools, and parks. As detailed previously on Table TR-1, the proposed 37 residential dwelling units would generate 349 daily trips. The CalEEMod modeling of the GHG emissions that would be generated by operation of the proposed Project identified (in Table GHG-1) that operational activities of the Project would generate 613 MTCO2e annually, which is substantially less than the 3,000 MTCO2e screening threshold. For all of the above reasons including that it is legally presumed to cause less than significant impacts, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to VMT. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would develop and operate 37 residential dwelling units on the site. None of the proposed structures would include incompatible uses such as farm equipment. The Project would also not increase any hazards related to a design feature. The onsite driveways would be developed in conformance with City design standards. The City’s construction permitting process includes review of Project plans to ensure that no potentially hazardous transportation design features would be introduced by the Project. For example, the design of the onsite circulation would has been reviewed to ensure fire engine accessibility is provided to the fire code standards. Also, access to the Project site would be provided by a 20-foot-wide entry driveway and 20-foot- wide exit driveway along Mission Drive that would be designed in compliance with the City’s design Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 102 standards to provide for adequate turning for passenger cars, fire trucks, and delivery trucks. As a result, impacts related to geometric design feature would be less than significant. d) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The proposed Project would develop and operate residential dwelling units that would be permitted and approved in compliance with existing safety regulations, such as the California Building Code and Fire Code (as integrated into the City’s Municipal Code) to ensure that it would not result in inadequate emergency access. The proposed construction activities, including equipment and supply staging and storage, would occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site or adjacent areas. During construction, Mission Drive would remain open to ensure adequate emergency access to the Project area and vicinity. Thus, impacts related to inadequate emergency access during construction activities would not occur. As described above, operation of the proposed Project would also not result in inadequate emergency access. Direct access to the Project site would be provided from Mission Drive. The driveways and on-site circulation constructed by the Project would be evaluated through the City’s permitting procedures to meet the City’s design standards that provides adequate turning space for passenger cars, fire trucks, and delivery trucks. The Project is also required to provide fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants and sprinklers). The LAFD would review the development plans as part of the plan check and permitting procedures to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant to the requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9). As a result, impacts related to inadequate emergency access would not occur. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to transportation that are applicable to the Project. Mitigation Measure No mitigation measures related to transportation are required. Sources City of Rosemead General Plan Update Circulation Element. Accessed: https://cdn5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf City of Rosemead Public Transportation. Accessed: https://www.cityofrosemead.org/cms/one.aspx?pageId=10909050 Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Memo, prepared by EPD Solutions, Inc. (VMT 2022) (Appendix K). Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 103 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Assembly Bill 52 Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014 (Assembly Bill [AB] 52), requires that Lead Agencies evaluate a Project’s potential to impact “tribal cultural resources.” Such resources include “[s]ites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources.” AB 52 also gives lead agencies the discretion to determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a resource qualifies as a “tribal cultural resource.” Also, per AB 52 (specifically PRC 21080.3.1), Native American consultation is required upon request by a California Native American tribe that has previously requested that the City provide it with notice of such Projects. a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? No Impact. The Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the Project site, indicated that a church was constructed on the Project site between 1953 and 1964 but was demolished in 1992. The structure was not listed in the CRHR files. The site is currently vacant and does not contain any structures. Therefore, the Project site is not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources. The proposed Project would not result in an impact to a historical resource. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 104 An archaeological record search from the South-Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton was completed in order to identify any previously recorded archaeological site within the Project boundary or in the immediate vicinity. According to the records search, 21 resources are located within a one-half-mile radius of the site, one of which is located within the site. The Southern California Edison Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Transmission Line is located within the site. The transmission line is still present running above the property, however, none of the steel lattice towers, steel poles, or wood poles are within the Project site. The records search also identified 13 cultural resource reports conducted within on-half mile of the site, none of which included the subject property. b)A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the Project site, includes aerial photographs describing that the site was used for agricultural uses from approximately 1928 through the 1950’s and a small residential structure was located on the southeast corner of the site. A large commercial structure was developed on the southern portion of the site in the 1960’s that was later removed in the 1990’s. The site is currently vacant and does not contain any structures. The Project would excavate and recompact the upper two feet of onsite soils. The Project grading is anticipated to remain within the fill material but has the potential to encroach into native soils that have not been previously disturbed. A search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) was requested for the Project by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC results were found to be positive for the presence of sacred site or locations of religious or ceremonial importance within the search radius and the NAHC recommended contacting the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. Pursuant to the requirements of AB 52, the City sent informational letters about the proposed Project and requests for consultation to each tribe on the City’s list of tribes requesting consultation on June 14, 2022. These tribes include the following: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Gabrielino/Tongva Nation, Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council, Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council, Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. On June 28, 2022, the City received an e-mailed response to the City’s AB 52 outreach letters, which was from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh nation requesting consultation be scheduled if ground disturbance were to occur. Consultation occurred via email between June 28, 2022 and September 20, 2022. The consultation included provision of information that the Project site includes fill materials over native alluvial soils. The tribe Chairman, Andy Salas, provided modifications to proposed Project. The measure has been included as Mitigation Measure TCR-1 that provides tribal monitoring of initial site clearing (such as pavement removal) and ground- disturbing activities. Also, as described previously, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 has been included to provide procedures to be followed in the event that potential resources are discovered during grading, excavation, or construction activities. As detailed previously, if the discovered resource(s) appears Native American Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 105 in origin, a Native American Monitor shall be contacted to evaluate any potential tribal cultural resource(s) and shall have the opportunity to consult on appropriate treatment and curation of these resources. Additionally, as described previously (and included as PPP CUL-1), California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered in the Project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Thus, impacts related to California Native American tribe resources would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1and CUL-1; and PPP CUL-1. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural Resources. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural Resources. Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural Resources. Sources Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR 2005). Tribal Consultation Guidelines, Supplement to General Plan Guidelines. November 14, 2005. Available at: http://nahc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/SB-18-Tribal-Consultation-Guidelines.pdf Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 106 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the Project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s Projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact. Water Infrastructure The proposed Project is within an urbanized, developed area of Rosemead. The Project would install new onsite potable water lines that would connect to existing 6-inch water lines in Mission Drive. The new onsite water system would convey water supplies to the proposed residences and landscaping through plumbing/landscaping fixtures that are compliant with the CalGreen Plumbing Code and the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.08 for efficient use of water. The proposed Project would receive water supplies through the existing water lines located within the Mission Drive right-of-way that have the capacity to provide the increased water supplies needed to serve the proposed Project, and no expansions of the water pipelines that convey water to the Project site would be required. Installation of the new water distribution lines on the site would only serve the proposed Project and would not provide new water supplies to any offsite areas. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 107 The construction activities related to the onsite water infrastructure that would be needed to serve the proposed residences is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this MND. For example, construction emissions for excavation and installation of the water infrastructure is included in Sections 3, Air Quality and 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and noise volumes from these activities are evaluated in Section 13, Noise. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the construction of new water facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, and impacts would be less than significant. Wastewater Treatment The Project site is currently served by the existing 8-inch sewer line within Mission Drive. The Project includes installation of onsite 8-inch sewer lines that would connect to the existing 8-inch sewer line in Mission Drive. The Project site is served by the Los Angeles Sanitary District. The construction activities related to installation of the onsite sewer infrastructure that would serve the proposed Project, is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this MND. For example, construction emissions for excavation and installation of the sewer infrastructure is included in Section 3, Air Quality and 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and noise volumes from these activities are evaluated in Section 13, Noise. As the proposed Project includes facilities to serve the proposed development, it would not result in the need for construction of other new wastewater facilities or expansions, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Stormwater Drainage The Project would maintain the existing stormwater flow pattern. The existing condition has 98.5% (3.33 acres) pervious area and 1.5% (0.05 acre) impervious area. After development of the Project, the site would have 14% (0.47 acres) pervious area and 86% (2.91 acres) impervious area. The proposed Project would increase the overall impervious footprint by 84.5% (2.86 acres), which would increase offsite stormwater drainage. However, The Project would install new onsite catch basins, infiltration systems, and a detention pipe system to capture and treat stormwater. Stormwater would be infiltrated by a proposed onsite drywell system. Because the Project would reduce impervious surfaces, and the drywell and storm drain system have been sized to accommodate required flows, the proposed Project would not result in an increase stormwater runoff. Thus, the Project would not require or result in the construction of new offsite stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing offsite facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. The required installation of onsite drainage features is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond those identified in other sections of this IS/MND. Overall, impacts related to stormwater drainage facilities would be less than significant. b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? Less than Significant Impact. According to the California American Water Los Angeles County District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the District receives water supplies from groundwater, surface water, purchased and imported water, and recycled water. In 2020, the District had a total supply of 19,453 AFY of groundwater from the Central, Duarte, and San Marino Basins, imported water, and surface water. The District also had a total water demand of 19,453 Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 108 AF in 2020. The UWMP Projects that demands will steadily increase through 2045 with a maximum of 22,618 AFY in 2045 (UWMP 2020). MWD has completed its water service reliability assessment in their Draft 2020 UWMP and determined that, under the conditions required by the UWMP, it has supply capabilities sufficient to meet expected demands from 2025 through 2045 under a single dry- year condition and period of drought lasting five consecutive water years, as well as in a normal water year hydrologic condition as shown in Table UT-1, below. (Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 2021). Table UT-1: District Supply Reliability – Average, Single Dry Year, & Multiple Dry Years Water Sources 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Normal Year Supply 21,595 21,894 22,193 22,405 22,618 Normal Year Demand 21,595 21,894 22,193 22,405 22,618 Single Dry Year Supply 24,650 24,991 25,332 25,574 25,817 Single Dry Year Demand 24,605 24,991 25,332 25,574 25,817 Multiple Dry Years Supply (1st Year) 23,966 24,298 24,629 24,865 25,101 Multiple Dry Years Demand (1st Year) 23,966 24,298 24,629 24,865 25,101 Multiple Dry Years Supply (2nd Year) 24,718 25,059 25,380 25,623 25,101 Multiple Dry Years Demand (2nd Year) 24,718 25,059 25,380 25,623 25,101 Multiple Dry Years Supply (3rd Year) 24,073 24,404 24,697 24,932 N/A Multiple Dry Years Demand (3rd Year) 24,073 24,404 24,697 24,932 N/A Multiple Dry Years Supply (4th Year) 19,200 19,463 19,681 19,868 N/A Multiple Dry Years Demand (4th Year) 19,200 19,463 19,681 19,868 N/A Multiple Dry Years Supply (5th Year) 19,342 19,607 19,810 19,999 N/A Multiple Dry Years Supply (5th Year) 19,342 19,607 19,810 19,999 N/A Source: California American Water Los Angeles Country District 2020 UWMP Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 109 The UWMP estimates water demand based on the water use target of 187 gallons per capita daily. As described in Section 14, Population and Housing, the proposed 37 residential units are anticipated to result in approximately 128 new residents. Based on the UWMP water estimates, the Project would result in a water demand of 23,936 gallons per day (26.81acre feet per year). The Project’s demand of 26.81 acre-feet equates to 0.8 percent of the anticipated increase in water demand. Based on the City’s UWMP supply and demand data and the limited increase in water demand from the proposed Project, the City would have water supplies available to serve the Project. In addition, the Project would limit water use by inclusion of low-flow plumbing and irrigation fixtures, pursuant to the California Title 24 requirements. Therefore, the proposed Project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project, and impacts would be less than significant. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s Projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would generate wastewater flows, which would be conveyed through an existing 8-inch sewer line in Mission Drive to the District’s 18-inch diameter truck sewer which has a capacity of 5.9 million gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow of 0.7 mgd. The wastewater generated by the proposed Project would be treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 100 mgd and currently processes an average flow of 66.9 mgd (CalRecycle 2022). In the event that biosolids and wastewater flow exceed the capacity of the San Jose Creek, excess flows would be diverted to, and treated at, the Joint Water Pollution Control Plan in the City of Caron (Appendix L). The expected wastewater flow from the Project site is 9,100 gallons per day. In addition, a Sewer Area Study (Appendix M) was conducted to investigate the sewage discharge route along Mission Drive and ensure there is adequate sewer capacity for the proposed Project. The study concluded that the existing sewer system has a design capacity above the calculated cumulative flow from the proposed Project. Thus, the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant would be able to accommodate the wastewater flow from the Project, and impacts related to the wastewater treatment system would be less than significant. d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would generate solid waste that would be hauled to the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility in the City of Whittier that is operated by the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. The Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility is permitted to accept up to 4,400 tons per day (8,800,000 pounds/day) of municipal solid waste. Construction Project construction would generate solid waste for landfill disposal in the form of demolition debris from the existing pavement and infrastructure that would be removed from the site. Demolition waste would be properly characterized as required by law and recycled or disposed of at an appropriate type of landfill for such materials. Construction waste in the form of packaging and discarded materials would also be generated by the proposed Project. Section 5.408.1 of the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code and the City Municipal Code Chapter 50.64 requires demolition and construction activities to recycle or reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste. Thus, the demolition and construction solid waste that would be disposed of at the landfill would be approximately 35 percent of the waste Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 110 generated. Therefore, demolition activities which includes removal of the partially paved road on the Project site would not result in substantial waste. As described above, the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility has capacity of approximately 4,400 tons per day. Therefore, the facility would be able to accommodate the addition of demolition of the partial road on the proposed Project site, and impacts would be less than significant. Operation The CalEEMod solid waste generation rate for residential land use is 0.41 tons per resident per year. As described previously, full occupancy of the proposed Project would generate approximately 128 residents. Thus, operation of the Project would generate approximately 52.48 tons per solid waste per year; or 0.99 tons per week. However, at least 75 percent of the solid waste is required by AB 341 and Municipal Code Chapter 8.32 to be recycled, which would reduce the volume of landfilled solid waste to approximately 495 pounds per week. As the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility has a maximum capacity of approximately 4,400 tons per day, the solid waste generated by the Project would be within the capacity of the landfill. Thus, the proposed Project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the Project’s solid waste disposal needs and the Project would not impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Impacts related to landfill capacity would be less than significant. e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. The proposed Project would result in new development that would generate an increased amount of solid waste. All solid waste-generating activities within the City is subject to the requirements set forth in Section 5.408.1 of the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code that requires demolition and construction activities to recycle or reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste, and AB 341 that requires diversion of a minimum of 75 percent of operational solid waste, as included in Municipal Code Chapter 8.32. Implementation of the proposed Project would be consistent with all state regulations, as ensured through the City’s development Project permitting process. Therefore, the proposed Project would comply with all solid waste statute and regulations; and impacts would not occur. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP UT-1: Solid Waste. As required by Municipal Code Chapter 8.32, Section 8.32.010 of the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, and AB 341 the Project shall implement a Waste Management Plan to ensure that the construction and operational diversion requirements would be met. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to utilities and service systems are required. Sources CalReycyle Disposal Reporting System: Jurisdiction Tons by Facility(CalRecycle 2022). Accessed: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 111 California American Water Los Angeles District UWMP (UWMP 2022). Accessed: https://wuedata.water.ca.gov/public/uwmp_attachments/6241132438/CAW%20LA%20Distric t%202020%20UWMP_with%20Appendicies_Final.pdf Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 112 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 20. WILDFIRES. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose Project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. According to the California Fire Hazard Severity Zones mapping, the City of Rosemead (including the Project site) is not within a Very High Fire Hazard zone. Direct access to the Project site would be provided from a 40-foot-wide driveway along Mission Drive. The Project is required to design and construct internal access and provide fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants and sprinklers) in conformance with the City’s Municipal Code, and the Fire Department would review the development plans prior to approval to ensure adequate emergency access. pursuant to the requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9, included in the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 8.24, California Fire Code as amended by Los Angeles County Fire Code). As a result, the proposed Project would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and impacts not occur. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose Project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? No Impact. As described in the previous response, the Project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 357 to 363 feet above mean sea level. The areas within the Project’s vicinity also do not contain hillsides or other factors that could exacerbate wildfire risks. therefore, no impact would occur. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 113 c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. As described in the previous responses, the Project site is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is located within an urbanized area within the City of Rosemead. The Project does not involve any new infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risks or result in other impacts to the environment. Therefore, no impacts would occur. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. As described in the previous responses, the Project site is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 357 to 363 feet above mean sea level. Likewise, areas adjacent to the Project site are relatively flat urban sites that do not contain hillsides or other factors that would expose people or structures to flooding or landslides as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. The Project would not generate slopes and would connect to existing drainage facilities. Thus, the Project would not result in risks related to wildfires or risks related to downslope or downstream flooding or landslides after wildfires. Therefore, impacts would not occur. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to wildfires that are applicable to the Project. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures related to wildfires are required. Sources State Geoportal. California Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). Available: https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/CALFIRE-Forestry::california-fire-hazard-severity-zones-fhsz Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 114 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the Project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a Project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past Projects, the effects of other current Projects, and the effects of probable future Projects)? c) Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Does the Project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As described in Section 4, Biological Resources, the Project site is located within an urban area and currently disturbed and vacant. No endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or California Native Plant Society (CNPS) occur on the site. The proposed Project would develop the Project site with 37 residential units, which would include installation of new ornamental landscaping. As no sensitive species or habitats are located within the urban and developed site, implementation of the Project would not reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, or impact a plant or animal community. However, the Project site contains ornamental trees that could be used for nesting by common bird species that are protected by the federal MBTA and the California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503.5, 3511, and 3515. These bird species are protected during the avian nesting and breeding season, which occurs between February 1 and September 15. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO- 1 has been included to require a nesting bird survey if construction commences during nesting season. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 115 As described in Section 5, Cultural Resources, the Project site does not contain any buildings or structures that meet any of the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) criteria or qualify as “historical resources” as defined by CEQA. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 has been included to provide procedures to be followed in the event that potential archaeological resources are discovered during grading, excavation, or construction activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1, impacts related to important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory would be less than significant. b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a Project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past Projects, the effects of other current Projects, and the effects of probable future Projects)? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project would redevelop the Project site for 37 residential units within a developed area. The Project would provide land uses that are consistent with the adjacent residential uses. As described above, all of the potential impacts related to implementation of the Project would be less than significant or reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation measures that are imposed by the City that effectively reduce environmental impacts. The cumulative effect of the proposed Project taken into consideration with other development projects in the area would be limited, because the Project would develop the site with a slighter higher density than the General Plan land use designation, zoning designation, and County code, and would not result in substantial effects to any environmental resource topic, as described throughout this document. As discussed in Section 3, Air Quality, SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook methodology describes that any projects that result in daily emissions that exceed any of these thresholds would have both an individually (project-level) and cumulatively significant air quality impact. If estimated emissions are less than the thresholds, impacts would be considered less than significant. As shown in Table AQ-2, CalEEMod results indicate that construction emissions generated by the proposed Project would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Operational emissions associated with the proposed Project were modeled using CalEEMod and are presented in Table AQ-3. As shown, the proposed Project would result in long-term regional emissions of the criteria pollutants that would be below the SCAQMD’s applicable thresholds. Therefore, the Project’s operational emissions would not exceed the NAAQS and CAAQS, would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant impacts, and operational impacts would be less than significant. As discussed in Section 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, global climate change occurs as the result of global emissions of GHGs. An individual development Project does not have the potential to result in direct and significant global climate change effects in the absence of cumulative sources of GHGs. The Project’s total annual GHG emissions at buildout would not exceed the annual GHG emissions threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. As shown on Table GHG-1, the Project would result in approximately 613 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the Project would not result in cumulative impacts related to GHG emissions. The Project meets the City’s VMT screening criteria for residential projects. Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant cumulative impact related to VMT. Therefore, cumulatively Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 116 considerable transportation related impacts would be less than significant. Given that the potential Project-related impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level, implementation of the Project would not result in impacts that are cumulatively considerable when evaluated with the impacts of other current projects, or the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, the Project’s contribution to any significant cumulative impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable. As discussed throughout this IS/MND, mitigation would be required and incorporated as necessary. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. c) Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project proposes development of the Project site for residential uses. As described previously, the Project site is within an urban area and surrounded by consistent land uses. The Project would not consist of any use or any activities that would result in a substantial negative affect on persons in the vicinity. This includes potential impacts related to construction, demolition, and the proposed residential activities. All resource topics associated with the proposed Project have been analyzed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines and were found to pose no impacts or less-than-significant impacts with implementation of mitigation measures related to biological resources, cultural resources, paleontological resources, noise, and tribal cultural resources; and existing plans, programs, or policies that are required by the City. Consequently, with mitigation, the proposed Project would result in less than significant direct and indirect environmental effects on human beings. Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies PPP AES-1: Light and Glare. As listed in Section 1, Aesthetics. PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. As listed in Section 2, Air Quality. PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. As listed in Section 2, Air Quality. PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. As listed in Section 2, Air Quality. PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. As listed in Section 5, Cultural Resources. PPP E-1: CalGreen Compliance. As listed in Section 6, Energy. PPP GEO-1: California Building Code. As listed in Section 7, Geology and Soils. PPP WQ1: SWPPP. As listed in Section 7, Geology and Soils. PPP WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. As listed in Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality. PPP NOI-1: Construction Hours. As listed in Section 13, Noise. PPP NOI-2: Best Construction Practices. As listed in Section 13, Noise. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 117 PPP PS-1: School Fees. As listed in Section 15, Public Services. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Migratory Bird Treaty Act. As listed in Section 4, Biological Resources. Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. As listed in Section 5, Cultural Resources. Mitigation Measure PAL-1: Incidental Discoveries. As listed in Section 7, Geology and Soils. Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Construction Vibration. As listed in Section 13, Noise. Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. As listed in Section 18, Tribal Cultural Resources. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 118 5 GENERAL REFERENCES City of Rosemead Municipal Code. Accessed: https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT13 PUSE_CH13.16STWAMA_13.16.010DE City of Rosemead General Plan. Accessed: https://cdn5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 119 6 DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS Lead Agency: City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Blvd Rosemead, CA 91770 Contact Person and Phone Number: Annie Lao, (626) 569-2144 CEQA Document Preparer: Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc. Konnie Dobreva, JD Brooke Blandino Heather Roberts Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Analysis, Appendix A Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc. Alex J. Garber General Biological Assessment, Appendix B Hernandez Environmental Services. Shawn Hernandez Cultural Resources Assessment, Appendix C Brian F. Smith and Associates Brian F. Smith, MA Elena C. Goralogia, BA Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Appendix D Albus & Associates, Inc David E. Albus, Principal Engineer Paleontological Resources Assessment, Appendix E Brian F. Smith and Associates Brian F. Smith, MA Elena C. Goralogia, BA Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Appendix F Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Alicia Jansen, Associate Scientist Joshua Sargent, MS, PG Kyle Emerson, PG, CEG Remedial Excavation Completion Report, Appendix G Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Brian Viggiano, PG, Kyle Emerson, CEG Preliminary Hydrology Study, Appendix H C&V Consulting, Inc. Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 120 Ryan Bittner, P.E. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan, Appendix I C&V Consulting, Inc. Ryan Bittner, PE Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis, Appendix J LSA JT Stephens Trip Generation and VMT Analysis, Appendix K Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc. Meghan Macias, TE Sewer Will Serve Letter for 8601 Mission Drive, Appendix L Los Angeles County Sanitation District Robert C. Ferrante Sewer Area Study VTTM No. 83705, Appendix M C&V Consulting, Inc. Dane P. McDougall, RCE Mission Villas Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 121 This page intentionally left blank. Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 2. Response to Public Comments City of Rosemead 2-1 Final MND December 2022 Chapter 2. Response to Comments on the Public Review Draft MND This memo contains responses to the comments that the City of Rosemead (Lead Agency) received on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Mission Villas Residential Project during the public review period, which began November 10, 2022, and closed November 30, 2022 (SCH No. 2022110230). This document has been prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.) and represents the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. This document and the circulated IS/MND together comprise the Final MND. The following letter was submitted to the City during the public review period: 1. Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Received November 28, 2022 (2 pages) The public comments and responses to comments are included in the public record and are available to the Lead Agency decision-makers for their review and consideration prior to making their decision. Pursuant to CEQA Statute Section 21155.2(b)(5), none of the comments provide substantial evidence that the Project will have significant environmental effects which would require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. None of this new material indicates that the Project will result in a significant environmental impact or an increase in a less than significant impact previously disclosed in the Mission Villas Residential Project MND. This Response to Comments includes minor revisions to the Public Review Draft MND based upon: (1) clarifications required to prepare a response to a specific comment; and/or (2) typographical errors. These revisions do not alter any impact conclusions that are disclosed in the MND. Revisions to the MND are outlined in Chapter 3, MND Errata. Although CEQA Statute Section 21155 does not require a Lead Agency to prepare written responses to comments received, the City of Rosemead has elected to prepare the following written responses with the intent of conducting a comprehensive and meaningful evaluation of the proposed Project. The number designations in the responses are correlated to the bracketed and identified portions of each comment letter. Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 2. Response to Public Comments City of Rosemead 2-2 Final MND December 2022 Letter A1: Los Angeles County Sanitation District (2 pages) Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 2. Response to Public Comments City of Rosemead 2-3 Final MND December 2022 Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 2. Response to Public Comments City of Rosemead 2-4 Final MND December 2022 RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER A1: Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Comment A1.1: This comment introduces the comment letter, and states that the commenter offers comments on sewage service. The comment states that the wastewater would discharge to a local sewer line then convey to the District’s Grand Avenue Trunk Sewer located in Mission Drive. The comment also states that the 18-inch diameter trunk sewer has a capacity of 5.9 million gallons per day (mgd) and a peak flow of 0.7 mgd. Chapter 3 of the Final MND has been revised to include a description of the 18-inch diameter trunk sewer line. Therefore, no further analysis is warranted. Comment A1.2: This comment states that the wastewater will be treated at the Whittier Narrows Water Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 15 mgd and currently processes an average recycled flow of 8.3 mgd or the Los Coyotes WRP which has a capacity of 37.5 mgd and currently processes an average recycled flow of 17.5 mgd. Chapter 3 of the Final MND has been revised to include a description of the two wastewater treatment plants. Therefore, no further response is warranted. Comment 1.3: This comment states that the expected wastewater flow from the Project is expected to be 10,036 gallons per day (gpd) and provides a link to the copy of the District’s average wastewater generation factors. Chapter 3 of the Final MND has been revised to include the 10,036 (gpd). The change from 9,100 gpd to 10,036 gpd is minimal and would remain within the existing sewer capacity Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant and no further analysis is warranted. Comment A1.4: This comment states that a connection fee may be required before the Project is permitted to discharge to the Districts’ Sewerage System. The comment also breaks down how the connection fees are determined. The comment does not contain any information regarding CEQA or requiring changes to the MND. No further response is warranted. Comment A1.5: This comment states that the capacities of the Districts’ wastewater treatment facilities are based on the regional growth forecast adopted by SCAG. The comment also states that the letter does not constitute a guarantee of wastewater service but is to advise the developer that the Districts intend to provide the service up to the levels that are legally permitted. The comment does not contain any information regarding CEQA or provide comments on the adequacy of the Draft MND. Thus, no further response is warranted. Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 3. Errata City of Rosemead 3-1 Final MND December 2022 Chapter 3. Errata to the Mission Villas Residential Project MND This section contains revisions to the Public Review Draft MND based upon: (1) clarifications required to prepare a response to a specific comment; and/or (2) typographical errors. These revisions do not alter any impact significance conclusions as disclosed in the MND. Changes made to the MND are identified here in strikeout text to indicate deletions and in bold underlined text to signify additions. Revisions in Response to Written Comments and County Changes to Text The following text, organized by MND Chapters and Sections, has been revised in response to comments received on the MND and corrections identified by the City. 18 Tribal Cultural Resources Threshold b on page 104 will be revised as follows: On June 28, 2022, the City received an e-mailed response to the City’s AB 52 outreach letters, which was from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh nation requesting consultation be scheduled if ground disturbance were to occur. Consultation occurred via email between June 28, 2022 and XX September 20, 2022. The consultation included provision of information that the Project site includes fill materials over native alluvial soils. The tribe Chairman, Andy Salas, provided modifications to proposed Project. The measure has been included as Mitigation Measure TCR-1 that provides tribal monitoring of initial site clearing (such as pavement removal) and ground- disturbing activities. 19 Utilities and Service Systems Threshold a on page 107 will be revised as follows: Wastewater Treatment The Project site is currently served by the existing 8-inch sewer line within Mission Drive. The Project includes installation of onsite 8-inch sewer lines that would connect to the existing local 8-inch sewer line in Mission Drive. The line would convey to the Los Angeles Sanitary District’s 18-inch trunk sewer line in Grand Avenue. The Project site is served by the Los Angeles Sanitary District. The construction activities related to installation of the onsite sewer infrastructure that would serve the proposed Project, is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this MND. For example, construction emissions for excavation and installation of the sewer infrastructure is included in Section 3, Air Quality and 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and noise volumes from these activities are evaluated in Section 13, Noise. As the proposed Project includes facilities to serve the proposed development, it would not result in the need for construction of other new wastewater facilities or expansions, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Threshold c on page 109 will be revised as follows: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would generate wastewater flows, which would Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 3. Errata City of Rosemead 3-2 Final MND December 2022 be conveyed through an existing 8-inch sewer line in Mission Drive to the District’s 18-inch diameter truck sewer which has a capacity of 5.9 million gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow of 0.7 mgd. The wastewater generated by the proposed Project would be treated at the Whittier Narrows Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 15 mgd and currently processes an average recycled flow of 8.3 mgd or the Los Coyotes Water Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 37.5 mgd and currently processes an average recycled flow of 17.5 mgd. the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 100 mgd and currently processes an average flow of 66.9 mgd (CalRecycle 2022). In the event that biosolids and wastewater flow exceed the capacity of the San Jose Creek, excess flows would be diverted to, and treated at, the Joint Water Pollution Control Plan in the City of Caron (Appendix L). The expected wastewater flow from the Project site is 10,036 9,100 gallons per day. In addition, a Sewer Area Study (Appendix M) was conducted to investigate the sewage discharge route along Mission Drive and ensure there is adequate sewer capacity for the proposed Project. The study concluded that the existing sewer system has a design capacity above the calculated cumulative flow from the proposed Project. Thus, the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant would be able to accommodate the wastewater flow from the Project, and impacts related to the wastewater treatment system would be less than significant. Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP City of Rosemead 4-1 Final MND December 2022 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead or public agency that approves or carries out a project for which an Mitigated Negative Declaration has been certified which identifies one or more significant adverse environmental effects and where findings with respect to changes or alterations in the project have been made, to adopt a “…reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment” (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21081, 21081.6). A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is required to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are successfully implemented. The City of Rosemead is the Lead Agency for the Project and is responsible for implementation of the MMRP. This report describes the MMRP for the Project and identifies the parties that will be responsible for monitoring implementation of the individual mitigation measures in the MMRP. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The MMRP for the Project will be active through all phases of the Project, including design, construction, and operation. The attached table identifies the mitigation program required to be implemented by the City for the Project. The table identifies mitigation measures required by the City to mitigate or avoid significant impacts associated with the implementation of the Project, the timing of implementation, and the responsible party or parties for monitoring compliance. The MMRP also includes a column that will be used by the compliance monitor (individual responsible for monitoring compliance) to document when implementation of the measure is completed. As individual Plan, Program, Policies; and mitigation measures are completed, the compliance monitor will sign and date the MMRP, indicating that the required actions have been completed. Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP City of Rosemead 4-2 Final MND December 2022 This page intentionally left blank. Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-3 TABLE 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure Action and Timing Responsible for Ensuring Compliance / Verification Date Completed and Initials BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MM BIO-1: Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the City Building Department, shall verify that in the event that vegetation and tree removal activities occur within the active breeding season for birds (February 1–September 15), the Project applicant (or their Construction Contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist (meaning a professional biologist that is familiar with local birds and their nesting behaviors) to conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 3 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The nesting survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project-related construction activities, such as noise, human activity, and dust, etc. If active nesting of birds is observed within 100 feet of the designated construction area prior to construction, the qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate buffer around the active nests (e.g., as much as 500 feet for raptors and 300 feet for non- raptors [subject to the recommendations of the qualified biologist]), and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Submittal of pre-activity field survey results report. Prior to construction. City of Rosemead CULTURAL RESOURCES MM CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. The Applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to perform archaeological monitoring and the archaeologist shall be present during initial ground-disturbing activities (e.g., site preparation and grading) to identify and assess any known or suspected archaeological and/or cultural resource. The qualified archaeologist shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan to address the details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural resource activities that occur on the Project site. The plan shall include a scope of work, project grading and development scheduling, pre-construction meeting (with consultants, contractors, and monitors), a monitoring schedule during all initial ground-disturbance related activities, safety requirements, and protocols to follow in the event of previously unknown cultural resources discoveries that could be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The plan shall be submitted to the City and the Consulting Tribe(s) for review and Confirmation of professional archaeologist retention/ongoing/monito ring/submittal of Report of Findings. Prior to Grading Permit and during subsurface excavation. City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-4 Mitigation Measure Action and Timing Responsible for Ensuring Compliance / Verification Date Completed and Initials comment, prior to final approval by the City. MM TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activity at the Project site, the Project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation. A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Rosemead Planning and Building Department prior to the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The Tribal monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground- disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project area. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project site are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing activities at the Project site have little to no potential to impact Tribal Cultural Resources. Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. All Tribal Cultural Resources unearthed by Project activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor approved by the Consulting Tribe. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Consulting Tribe shall retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the Project site, all ground disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Work may continue on other parts of the Project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a non-Native American resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a Submit a CRMP prepared by Professional Archaeologist in consultation with Tribe. Prior to Grading Permit. Qualified Professional Archeologist/ City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-5 Mitigation Measure Action and Timing Responsible for Ensuring Compliance / Verification Date Completed and Initials “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. PALEONTOLOGICAL MM PAL-1: Incidental Discoveries. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the City of Rosemead Planning Department shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans and specifications state that in the event that potential paleontological resources are discovered during excavation, grading, or construction activities, work shall cease within 50 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist (i.e., a practicing paleontologist that is recognized in the paleontological community and is proficient in vertebrate paleontology) from the City or County List of Qualified Paleontologists has evaluated the find and established a protocol for addressing the find, in accordance with federal and state regulations. Construction personnel shall not collect or move any paleontological materials and associated materials. If any fossil remains are discovered, the paleontologist shall make a recommendation if monitoring shall be required for the continuance of earth moving activities, and shall provide such monitoring if required. Submittal of a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Plan. Prior to Grading Permit. City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-6 Mitigation Measure Action and Timing Responsible for Ensuring Compliance / Verification Date Completed and Initials NOISE Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Construction Vibration. Project plans and specifications shall include the requirement that that operation of any heavy equipment shall be prohibited within 15 feet of existing residences to the north and east. If heavy equipment is necessary within 15 feet of existing structures, the following measures shall be implemented. • Identify structures that could be affected by ground-borne vibration and would be located within 15 feet of where heavy construction equipment would be used. This task shall be conducted by a qualified structural engineer as approved by the City’s Director of Community Development or designee. • Develop a vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan for approval by the City’s Director of Community Development, or designee, to identify structures where monitoring would be conducted; set up a vibration monitoring schedule; define structure-specific vibration limits; and address the need to conduct photo, elevation, and crack surveys to document before and after construction conditions. Construction contingencies such as alternative methods or equipment that would generate lower vibration levels would be identified for when vibration levels approached the limits. • At a minimum, monitor vibration during initial demolition activities. Monitoring results may indicate the need for more intensive measurements if vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold. • When vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) limit, suspend construction and implement contingencies identified in the approved vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan to either lower vibration levels or secure the affected structures. Notes on grading plans. Prior to grading permit. City of Rosemead TRIBAL MM CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. See Cultural Mitigation above Confirmation of professional archaeologist City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-7 Mitigation Measure Action and Timing Responsible for Ensuring Compliance / Verification Date Completed and Initials retention/ongoing/monito ring/submittal of Report of Findings. Prior to Grading Permit and during subsurface excavation. MM TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. See Cultural Mitigation above Submit a CRMP prepared by Professional Archaeologist in consultation with Tribe. Prior to Grading Permit. Qualified Professional Archeologist/ City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-8 PPP Action and Timing Responsible for Ensuring Compliance / Verification Date Completed and Initials AESTHETICS PPP AES-1: Light and Glare. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 17.88, exterior lighting shall be of low intensity and shielded so that light will not spill out onto surrounding properties or Project above the horizontal plane. Compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 17.88 City of Rosemead AIR QUALITY PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 402. The Project shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. Compliance with Rule 402. Construction. City of Rosemead PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which includes the following: • All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily during dry weather; preferably in the mid-morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Compliance with Rule 402. Construction. City of Rosemead PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule (SCAQMD) Rule 1113. Only “Low-Volatile Organic Compounds” paints (no more than 50 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications shall be used. Compliance with Rule 1113. Construction. City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-9 CULTURAL RESOURCES PPP CUL-1: Should human remains be discovered during Project construction, the Project would be required to comply with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which states that no further disturbance may occur in the vicinity of the body until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will determine the identity of and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. Cease all ground disturbing activity and contact NAHC within 24 Hours per PRC 5097.98 if remains are potentially Native American. In the case of an inadvertent discovery of human remains. City of Rosemead ENERGY PPP E-1: California Energy Code Compliance. The Project is required to comply with the 2019 California Energy Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 12.24) to ensure efficient use of energy. California Energy Code specifications are required to be incorporated into building plans as a condition of building permit approval. Compliance with 2019 California Energy Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 12.24). City of Rosemead GEOLOGY PPP GEO-1: California Building Code. The Project is required to comply with the California Building Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 15.04 to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards. California Building Code related and geologist and/or civil engineer specifications for the Project are required to be incorporated into grading plans and specifications as a condition of Project approval. Comply with California Building Code. Prior to Grading Permit. City of Rosemead PPP WQ-1: SWPPP. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a QSD (Qualified SWPPP Developer) in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control and the Los Angeles County RWQCB NPDES Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012- 0175. The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other NPDES regulations to limit the potential of erosion and polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure Review and approval of SWPPP. Prior to Grading Permit. City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-10 compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Rosemead staff or its designee to confirm compliance. WATER QUALITY PPP WQ-1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16 and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 (MS4 Permit). The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other NPDES regulations to limit the potential of erosion and polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by the City of Rosemead staff to confirm compliance. Provide a SWPPP in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter. Prior to Grading. City of Rosemead PPP WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project applicant shall have a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) approved by the City for implementation. The Project shall comply with the City’s Municipal Chapter 13.16 and the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements in effect for the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) at the time of grading permit to control discharges of sediments and other pollutants during operations of the Project. Provide a WQMP in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 13.16. Prior to Grading. City of Rosemead NOISE PPP NOI-1: Construction Hours. Per Municipal Code Chapter 8.36, construction and demolition activities may only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Construction activities should not take place at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. No person shall operate or allow the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, or alteration or demolition work outside of these hours to prevent noise disturbances. Compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 8.36. Construction. City of Rosemead PPP NOI-2: Best Construction Practices. In addition to compliance with the City’s Municipal Code allowed hours of construction of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays, the following recommendations would reduce construction noise to the extent feasible: City of Rosemead Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP 4-11 •The Project construction contractor should equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers, consistent with manufacturer’s standards. •The Project construction contractor should locate staging areas away from off-site sensitive uses during the later phases of Project development. •The Project construction contractor should place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the Project site whenever feasible. PUBLIC SERVICES PPP PS-1: School Fees. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide payment of the appropriate fees set forth by the applicable school districts related to the funding of school facilities pursuant to Government Code Section 65995 et seq. Pay school fees per Government Code Section 65995 et seq. City of Rosemead TRIBAL RESOURCES PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural Resources. Cease all ground disturbing activity and contact NAHC within 24 Hours per PRC 5097.98 if remains are potentially Native American. In the case of an inadvertent discovery of human remains. City of Rosemead UTILITIES PPP UT-1: Solid Waste. As required by Municipal Code Chapter 8.32, Section 8.32.010 of the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, and AB 341 the Project shall implement a Waste Management Plan to ensure that the construction and operational diversion requirements would be met. Comply with CalGreen standards. Prior to Final Inspection. City of Rosemead Urban Planning ■ Due Diligence ■ Entitlements ■ CEQA/NEPA ■ Development Services ■ Management ■ Public Outreach 2355 Main Street, Suite 100 ■ Irvine, CA 92614 949.794.1180 ■ info@epdsolutions.com This technical memorandum presents an analysis of the air quality, energy, and greenhouse gas (GHG) impact for the proposed Mission Villas Residential Development (project), located on Mission Drive east of Walnut Grove Avenue in the City of Rosemead. The project proposes the construction of 29 single family homes and eight townhomes with common open space and landscaping on a 3.435-acre site. The site is mostly vacant, with approximately 2,000 sf of concrete pavement on the south and west side of the project site. To support the CEQA document for the proposed project, this report analyzes the proposed project’s construction and operational impacts to air quality (emission of criterial pollutants) emissions using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod v. 2022.1) land use emission model. Table 1 shows the estimated construction schedule, which is expected to last about 11 months. Table 1. Construction Schedule Activity Start Date End Date Total Days Demolition 3/1/2023 3/2/2023 2 Site Preparation 3/3/2023 3/8/2023 5 Grading 3/9/2023 3/17/2023 8 Building Construction 3/18/2023 12/11/2023 230 Paving 12/12/2023 1/1/2024 18 Architectural Coating 1/2/2024 1/22/2024 18 Summary of Air Quality, Energy and GHG Impacts Air Quality: The project’s maximum daily emissions (regional and local) for construction and operation of the project would not exceed SCAQMD’s regional thresholds of significance. In addition, all construction activities would comply with applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations, including Rule 403 to minimize fugitive PM dust emissions, Rule 445 preventing woodfire stoves, and Rule 1113 which allows only Low-Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) paints. Projects that do not exceed the regional thresholds are assumed to not have a significant impact on a project level and cumulative level. Therefore, the proposed project would have less than significant air quality impacts. Energy: The project’s energy consumption for construction does not have any unusual characteristics and is not less efficient compared with other similar construction sites. The operation of the project is also similar to other residential projects and would comply with Title 24 as well as all applicable City business and energy codes and ordinances. To: City of Rosemead, Planning Division From: Alex J. Garber Date: 7/29/2022 Re: Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis for the Mission Villas Residential Development Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 2 GHG: Finally, the proposed project’s GHG emissions of 613 MTCO2e per year are below the existing operation and the SCAQMD significance threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for residential projects. Therefore, the project has a less then significant impact on GHG emissions. Air Quality Impact Tables Regional Emissions The SCAQMD has adopted maximum daily emission thresholds1 (pounds/day) for the criteria pollutants during construction and operation of a project. While incremental regional air quality impacts of an individual project are generally very small and difficult to measure, SCAQMDs regional maximum emission thresholds set standards to reduce the burden of SCAQMD to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards. The regional thresholds apply to the criteria pollutants mentioned above and can be found in Table 2 and Table 3 along with the CalEEMod projects emissions. These emission thresholds include the project emissions generated both from onsite sources (such as off-road construction equipment and fugitive dust) and offsite sources (vehicle travel leaving and arriving to the site). As can be seen in Table 2 and Table 3, the project would have less then significant regional air quality impacts. Table 2. Regional Construction Emission Estimates Construction Activity Maximum Daily Regional Emissions (pounds/day) ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 2023 Demolition 2.9 28.3 24.9 0.0 1.7 1.2 Site Prep 4.0 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3 Grading 2.1 20.1 20.7 0.0 2.8 1.8 Building Construction 1.4 13.1 15.7 0.0 0.6 0.6 Paving 1.1 8.5 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 Maximum Daily Emissions 4.0 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3 2024 Paving 1.1 8.2 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 Architectural Coating 31.3 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Maximum Daily Emissions 31.3 8.2 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 Maximum Daily Emission 2023-2024 31.3 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Table 3. Regional Operational Emission Estimates Operational Activity Maximum Daily Regional Emissions (pounds/day) ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Area 2.2 0.6 2.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 Energy 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 Mobile 1.3 1.1 11.6 0.0 0.9 0.2 Total Project Operational Emissions 3.5 2.4 14.2 0.0 1.0 0.3 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Local Emissions 1 SCAQMD April 2019. Found at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality- significance-thresholds.pdf Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 3 Localized significance thresholds (LSTs) were also adopted by the SCAQMD due to project-related construction or operational air emissions having the potential to exceed the state and national air quality standards in the project vicinity, while not exceeding the regional emission significance thresholds adopted by the SCAQMD. These thresholds set the maximum rates of daily construction or operational emissions from a project site that would not exceed a national or State ambient air quality standard2. The differences between regional thresholds and LSTs are as follows: 1. Regional thresholds include all sources of project construction and operational emissions generated from onsite and offsite emission sources whereas the LSTs only consider the emissions generated from onsite emission sources. 2. LSTs only apply to CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5, while regional thresholds include both ROG and SOx. 3. Regional Thresholds apply to emission sources located anywhere within the SCAQMD whereas the LSTs are location dependent and also depend on the size of the project, and emission location relative to the nearest sensitive receptor. A sensitive receptor is defined as an individual who is most susceptible to negative health affects when exposed to air pollutants including children, the elderly, and adults with chronic health issues. Such receptors include residences, schools, elderly care centers, and hospitals. SCAQMD provides screening look up tables (Appendix C of the SCAQMD 2008 Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology)3 for projects that disturb less than or equal to 5 acres in size in a day. These tables were created to easily determine if the daily emissions of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 from a project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. The thresholds are determined by: • Source receptor area (SRA), the geographic area within the SCAQMD that can act as both a source of emissions and a receptor of emission impacts (project is located within SRA 11, South San Gabriel Valley), • Size of the project, • Distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. The phase with the most ground disturbance would be the grading phase, which would grade 2.5 acres per day. The thresholds for 2 acres from Appendix C were used for a conservative analysis. Distance to the nearest sensitive receptor also determines the emission thresholds. The sensitive receptors closest to the project include residential homes northwest of the project boundary, about 1.35 meters (4.43 feet) from the property line. These receptors (distance from the project property line to the residential structure) are less than the minimum distance provided in the lookup tables (25 meters). Therefore, 25 meters (82 feet) was used. Table 4 shows the thresholds and estimated maximum daily construction emissions for the proposed project. As seen in Table 4, the proposed project has a less then significant localized construction air quality impact. 2 SCAQMD 2008: Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. Referenced on 9/3/2020 at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst- methodology-document.pdf 3 SCAQMD 2008: Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology Appendix C. Referenced on 9/16/2020 at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/appendix-c-mass- rate-lst-look-up-tables.pdf?sfvrsn=2 Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 4 Table 4. Localized Construction Emission Estimates Construction Activity Maximum Daily Regional Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 2022 Demolition 27.3 23.5 1.7 1.2 Site Prep 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3 Grading 20.0 19.7 2.8 1.8 Building Construction 12.8 14.3 0.6 0.6 Paving 8.5 10.5 0.4 0.4 Maximum Daily Emissions 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3 2023 Paving 8.2 10.5 0.4 0.4 Architectural Coating 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 Maximum Daily Emissions 8.2 10.5 0.4 0.4 Maximum Daily Emission 2023-2024 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 121 1,031 7 5 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No According to the SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs apply to project stationary mobile sources. Projects that involve mobile sources that spend long periods queuing and idling at a site, such as transfer facilities or warehousing and distribution buildings, have the potential to exceed the operational localized significance thresholds. The proposed project would operate 37 residential units, which do not involve vehicles idling or queueing for long periods. Therefore, due to the lack of significant stationary source emissions, impacts related to operational localized significance thresholds would be less than significant. Energy The State CEQA Guidelines do not have specific thresholds for Energy consumption. Rather, the question in Appendix G: VI Energy (a) asks, “[Does the proposed project] Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation?”. Therefore, for the purpose of this analysis, a significant impact would occur if: • The Project design and/or location encourages wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy, especially fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and petroleum, as well as the use of fuel by vehicles anticipated to travel to and from the project. The following assumptions were used to calculate the energy consumption of the proposed project: • The project’s construction and operational energy consumption would be provided by Southern California Edison Company. • Construction equipment fuel consumption derived from ARB Offroad2021 emission model • Fuel Consumption from vehicle travel derived from ARB EMFAC2021 emission model • Electrical and natural gas usage derived from the CalEEMod model Construction Electricity and Natural Gas Usage: Due to the project size and the fact that construction is temporary, the electricity used would be substantially less than that required for project operation and would have a negligible contribution to the project’s overall energy consumption. The electric power used would be for as-necessary lighting and electronic equipment such as computers inside temporary construction trailers. Natural gas is not anticipated to be needed for construction activities. Any consumption of natural gas would be minor and negligible in comparison to the operation of the proposed project. Petroleum Fuel Usage: Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 5 The construction equipment associated with construction activities (off-road/heavy duty vehicles) would rely on diesel fuel as would vendor and haul trucks involved in delivering building materials and removing the demolition debris from the project site. Construction workers would travel to and from the project site throughout the duration of construction, and for a conservative analysis it is assumed that construction workers would travel in gasoline-powered passenger vehicles. Table 5 shows the total fuel consumption and horsepower-hour data contained within the ARB OffRoad2021 emission model for specific types of diesel construction equipment. It should be noted that the total fuel consumption is a conservative analysis and would likely overstate the amount of fuel usage, as specific construction equipment is not expected to operate during the duration of the construction activity (i.e., crane). Table 6 summarizes the project’s construction vehicle fuel usage based on vehicle miles traveled and fuel usage factors contained in the ARB EMFAC2021. The trips included are worker vehicles, vendor vehicles, and haul vehicles. Table 7 shows the overall fuel consumption for construction of the proposed project. Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 6 Table 5. Construction Equipment Fuel Usage Activity Equipment Number Hours per day Horse- power Load Factor Days of Construction Total Horsepower- hours Fuel Rate (gal/hp-hr) Fuel Use (gallons) Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 367 0.4 2 4,698 0.020615155 97 Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 33 0.73 2 385 0.041912413 16 Excavators 3 8 36 0.38 2 657 0.019868435 13 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 367 0.4 5 17,616 0.020615155 363 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 84 0.37 5 4,973 0.019155948 95 Grading Graders 1 8 148 0.41 8 3,884 0.021167864 82 Excavators 1 8 36 0.38 8 876 0.019868435 17 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 84 0.37 8 5,967 0.019155948 114 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 367 0.4 8 9,395 0.020615155 194 Model Building Construction Cranes 1 8 367 0.29 230 195,831 0.014896922 2,917 Forklifts 3 8 82 0.2 230 90,528 0.010444038 945 Generator Sets 1 8 14 0.74 230 19,062 0.042356362 807 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 84 0.37 230 57,187 0.019155948 1,095 Welder 3 8 46 0.45 230 114,264 0.025848623 2,954 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 84 0.37 18 4,476 0.019155948 86 Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 8 10 0.56 18 1,613 0.019767572 32 Pavers 1 8 81 0.42 18 4,899 0.021536901 106 Paving Equipment 2 8 89 0.36 18 9,228 0.01846541 170 Rollers 2 8 36 0.38 18 3,940 0.019837453 78 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8 78 0.48 18 5,391 0.027606329 149 Total 10,233 Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 7 Table 6. Estimated Project Vehicle Fuel Usage Construction Source Number VMT Fuel Rate Gallons of Diesel Fuel Gallons of Gasoline Fuel Haul Trucks 56 1,120 5.96 188 0 Vendor Trucks 4 9,384 8.87 1,058 0 Worker Vehicles 72 80,179 25.91 0 3,095 Total 1,246 3,095 Table 7. Total Construction Fuel Usage Construction Source Gallons of Diesel Fuel Gallons of Gasoline Fuel Construction Vehicles 1,246 3,095 Off-road Construction Equipment 10,233 0 Total 11,479 3,095 Operation The operation of the proposed project would consume electricity, natural gas, and petroleum. The net energy consumption can be found in Table 8 below. Electricity and natural gas consumption were found in the Annual CalEEMod Output Sheets attached. The gasoline consumption rates utilize the same assumptions that were used for the worker vehicles. Table 8. Annual Operational Energy Requirements Operational Source Energy Usage Electricity (Kilowatt-Hours) Project 252,539 Natural Gas (Thousands British Thermal Units) Project 1,242,170 Petroleum (gasoline) Consumption Annual VMT Gallons of Gasoline Fuel Project 1,127,736 43,533 Conclusion The proposed project has no unusual characteristics that would make the construction fuel and energy consumption associated with construction of the project less efficient compared with other similar construction sites throughout the state. The consumption would also be temporary and localized. Operation of the 29 single family and eight townhome residential units would comply with all the energy efficiency requirements under Title 24 and all applicable City business and energy codes ordinances. Therefore, the construction and operation of the project would result in a less than significant impact for inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary energy use, and no mitigation would be required. Greenhouse Gas SCAQMD has convened a Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group to help lead agencies determine significance thresholds for GHG emissions when SCAQMD is not the lead agency. The last working group was held September 2010 (Meeting No. 15)4 and proposed a tiered approach, equivalent to the existing consistency determination requirements in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h)(3), 15125(d), or 15152(a). The most recent proposal issued in Meeting No. 15 uses a tiered approach, Tier 1 to Tier 5, to evaluate potential GHG impacts from various uses. This assessment will apply 4 SCAQMD 2010. Minutes of the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15. Referenced on 9/21/2020 at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa- significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 8 the Tier 3: Numerical Screening Thresholds approach. Tier three consists of screening values in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) (converting other greenhouse gasses to an equivalent impact of CO2), which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project impact would be is less than significant: • Option 1: All land use types: 3,000 MTCO2e per year • Option 2: Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial: 1,400 MTCO2e per year; or mixed use: 3,000 MT CO2e per year Executive Order S-3-05’s year 2050 goal is the basis of SCAQMD’ draft Tier 3 screening level thresholds. The objective of the Executive Order is to contribute to capping worldwide CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, stabilizing global climate change. The City of Tustin utilizes Option 1, and therefore the threshold is 3,000 MTCO2e per year. The project’s construction GHG emissions are shown in Table 9 and the overall construction and operational emissions are shown in Table 10 These emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod Model. The construction emissions are amortized over 30 years. As shown in Table 10, the net GHG emissions are 613 MTCO2e per year, below the existing operation and the 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant GHG impact. Table 9. Project Construction GHG Emissions Activity Annual GHG Emissions (MTCO2e) 2023 369 2024 2 Total Emissions 371 Total Emissions Amortized Over 30 Years 12 Table 10. Total GHG Emissions Activity Annual GHG Emissions (MTCO2e) Project Operational Emissions Mobile 412 Area 10 Energy 172 Water 4 Waste 3 Total Project Gross Operation Emissions 601 Project Construction Emissions 12 Total Emissions 613 Significance Threshold 3,000 Threshold Exceeded? No Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 9 Figure 1: Project Site Plan Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 10 CalEEMod Output Sheets Mission Villas Residential Development Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary 11 Fuel Calculations GENERAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 CITY OF ROSEMEAD, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Borstein Enterprises, Inc. 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025 Prepared by: Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, California 92530 (909) 772-9009 JULY 2022 APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | i Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ i 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Location ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Methodology..................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Literature Review .................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Field Survey .......................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Results .............................................................................................................................................. 2 3.1 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................ 2 3.2 Soils ........................................................................................................................................ 2 3.3 Habitat Communities.............................................................................................................. 2 3.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................. 3 3.5 Sensitive Biological Resources ............................................................................................. 3 3.5.1 Special Status Plants............................................................................................... 3 3.5.2 Sensitive Wildlife ....................................................................................................... 5 3.6 Critical Habitat ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.7 Migratory Nesting Birds......................................................................................................... 7 3.8 Wildlife Movement Corridors ................................................................................................ 7 3.9 Jurisdictional Waters .............................................................................................................. 7 4.0 Project Impacts................................................................................................................................ 7 4.1 Impacts to Habitat Types ........................................................................................................ 7 4.2 Impacts to Sensitive Species .................................................................................................. 8 4.3 Impacts to Migratory Nesting Birds ....................................................................................... 8 4.4 Impacts to Critical Habitat .................................................................................................... 8 4.5 Impacts to Wildlife Movement Corridors ............................................................................. 8 4.6 Conflict with Local Policies or Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources ...................... 8 4.7 Conflicts with the Provisions of an Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or Other Approved Local, Regional, or State Habitat Conservation Plan ........ 9 4.8 Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters ............................................................................................. 9 5.0 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 9 6.0 CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................................... 10 Fieldwork Performed By: ........................................................................................................................ 10 7.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 11 APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | ii Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 FIGURES Figure 1 – Location Map Figure 2 – Vicinity Map Figure 3 – Project Plans Figure 4 – Habitat Map Figure 5 – Impact Map APPENDICES Appendix A – Observed Species List Appendix B – Potential Species List Appendix C – Site Photographs Appendix D – Soils Map APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 1 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 1.0 Introduction Hernandez Environmental Services (HES) was contracted by Borstein Enterprises, Inc. to perform a General Biological Assessment (GBA) on an approximate 3.44-acre project site within the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The purpose of the GBA is to document the presence/absence of sensitive resources that may be present on the site, to document existing habitats, and generally address biological questions that may be needed for project approval. This GBA will present the results obtained from the field survey and will provide recommendations that may be needed to mitigate potential biological impacts from project activities. 1.1 Project Location The project site is located at the northeast corner of Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue within the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The site address is 8601 Mission Drive, Rosemead, California. The site consists of Los Angeles County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. Specifically, the project site is located within Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 11 West of the El Monte United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5- minute topographic quadrangle. The project site center point latitude and longitude are 34°05’18.4499” North and 118°04’51.9358” West (Figures 1 and 2). 1.2 Project Description The development plan is to construct 37 dwelling units comprised of 29 single-family detached homes and eight duplex units. The community includes a private park with tot lot and other amenities. The total area of impact is approximately 3.44 acres (Figure 3). 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Literature Review HES conducted a literature review and reviewed aerial photographs and topographic maps of the project location and surrounding areas. The following USGS quads were used to query the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB): El Monte, Pasadena, Mt. Wilson, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Los Angeles, Southgate, Whittier, and La Habra. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) County Endangered Species Lists and CNPS Rare Plant Inventory were reviewed to obtain species information for the project area. 2.2 Field Survey On June 27, 2022, HES conducted a field survey of the 3.44-acre project site. Ambient temperature APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 2 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 at 9:25 A.M. was 77° Fahrenheit, sunny, with winds ranging from 0 to 1 mile per hour from the southeast. The purpose of the field survey was to document the existing habitat conditions, obtain plant and animal species information, view the surrounding uses, assess the potential for state and federal waters, assess the potential for wildlife movement corridors, and assess for the presence of critical habitat constituent elements. The entire 3.44-acre project site was surveyed. Linear transects approximately 50 feet apart were walked for 100 percent coverage. All species observed were recorded and Global Positioning System (GPS) way points were taken to delineate specific habitat types, species locations, state or federal waters, or any other information that would be useful for the assessment of the project site. A comprehensive list of all plant and wildlife species that were detected during the field survey within the project site is included in Appendix A. Sensitive plant and wildlife species with the potential to occur within the project area are listed in Appendix B. Representative site photographs were taken and are included within Appendix C. 3.0 Results 3.1 Environmental Setting The project site, previously known as Guess Park, contains non-native, ruderal habitat with portions of disturbed dirt trails and gravel. The project site is bordered by residential development in all directions and busy roads to the south and west. The site is flat with elevations ranging from 351 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) to 360 feet AMSL. 3.2 Soils According to the USDA Web Soil Survey, soil at the project site is classified as Urban land- Palmview-Tujunga complex (1002), 0 to 5 percent slopes (Appendix D). 3.3 Habitat Communities The entire 3.44-acre project area supports a ruderal habitat community dominated by non-native plant species. This habitat type is common in previously disturbed areas. Characteristic species within the project area include red brome (Bromus madritensis), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium), telegraphweed (Heterotheca grandiflora), shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), cheeseweed (Malva parviflora), tumbleweed (Salsola tragus), and Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon). Several ornamental species from the surrounding single- family residences were near the fence but within the project site, including cape leadwort (Plumbago auriculata), creeping fig (Ficus pumila), oleander (Nerium oleander), California wild grape (Vitis californica), Chinese elm (Ulmus parviflora), and Brazilian peppertree (Schinus APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 3 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 terebinthifolia). 3.4 Wildlife General wildlife species documented on the project site or within the vicinity of the site include the northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), California towhee (Melozone crissalis), monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), bumblebee (Bombus sp.), and checkered white butterfly (Pontia protodice). 3.5 Sensitive Biological Resources A total of 45 sensitive species of plants and habitats and 45 sensitive species of animals has the potential to occur on or within the vicinity of the project location. These include those species listed or candidates for listing by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM). All habitats utilized by these species was evaluated during the site visit and a determination has been made for the presence or probability of presence in this report. This section will address those species listed as Candidate, Rare, Threatened, or Endangered under the state and federal endangered species laws or directed to be evaluated under other state, county, or municipal regulations. All sensitive species within a 5-mile radius of project area were reviewed and a complete list of those species are discussed in in Appendix B. 3.5.1 Special Status Plants A total of 13 plant species are listed as state and/or federally Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, Rare, or as 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. Other sensitive species that have a potential to exist on the project site will also be discussed in this section. The following is a description of these species: Braunton’s milk-vetch Braunton’s milk-vetch (Astragalus brauntonii) is a federally Endangered Species and ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is found in recently burned or disturbed areas with sandstone or carbonate layers. It is found in chaparral, coastal scrub, and valley-foothill grassland habitats. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. Parish’s brittlescale Parish’s brittlescale (Atriplex parishii) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is usually found on drying alkali flats with fine soils. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 4 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Nevin’s barberry Nevin’s barberry (Berberis nevinii) is a federally and state Endangered Species and is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species grows on steep, north-facing slopes or in low grade sandy washes. It inhabits chaparral, cismontane woodlands, coastal scrub, or riparian scrub. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. Lucky morning-glory Lucky morning-glory (Calystegia felix) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is found in meadows and seeps as well as riparian scrub. It prefers alkaline and alluvial soils. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Southern tarplant Southern tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. australis) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is often found in disturbed sites near the coast at marsh edges. It grows in alkaline soils with saltgrass or on vernal pool margins. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. Smooth tarplant Smooth tarplant (Centromadia pungens ssp. laevis) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species inhabits alkali meadows and scrub within valley and foothill grasslands, chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, playas, and riparian woodland. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Parry’s spineflower Parry’s spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is found on dry slopes and flats, sometimes at the interface of two vegetation types, such as chaparral and oak woodland. It grows in dry, sandy soils that are not found in the study area. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. Slender-horned spineflower Slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras) is a federally and state Endangered Species and is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species inhabits flood deposited terraces and washes within chaparral, cismontane woodland, and alluvial fan sage scrub. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. San Gabriel Mountains dudleya San Gabriel Mountains dudleya (Dudleya densiflora) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species grows in crevices and on decomposed granite on cliffs and canyon walls. APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 5 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 It inhabits chaparral, coastal scrub, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, and riparian forest habitats. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Mesa horkelia Mesa horkelia (Horkelia cuneata var. puberula) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species inhabits chaparral, cismontane woodland, and coastal scrub habitats within sand or gravel. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. Coulter’s goldfields Coulter’s goldfields (Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is usually found on alkaline soils in playas, sinks, and grasslands. It inhabits coastal salt marshes, playas, and vernal pools. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. California Orcutt grass California Orcutt grass (Orcuttia californica) is a federally and state Endangered Species and ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is found in vernal pools and wetlands. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. Brand’s star phacelia Brand’s star phacelia (Phacelia stellaris) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species grows in open areas of coastal scrub and coastal dunes. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. 3.5.2 Sensitive Wildlife A total of 10 wildlife species are listed as state and/or federally Threatened, Endangered, Rare, or Candidate Species. Sensitive species which have a potential to occur will also be discussed in this section. Following is a description of these species: Arroyo toad Arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus) is a federally Endangered Species and a CDFW Species of Special Concern. This species can be found in rivers with sandy banks, willows, cottonwoods, and sycamores. It inhabits loose, gravelly areas of streams in drier parts of the range. This species habitat includes semi-arid regions near washes or intermittent streams, including valley-foothills, desert riparian, and desert washes. No suitable habitat is present. This species is not present. Swainson’s hawk APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 6 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni) is a state Threatened Species. This avian species requires adjacent suitable foraging areas such as grasslands, or alfalfa or grain fields supporting rodent populations. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Bell’s sage sparrow Bell’s sage sparrow (Artemisiospiza belli belli) is on the CDFW Watch List. This species lives in chaparral and coastal scrub habitats and nests in chaparral dominated by dense stands of chamise. Suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species has the potential to be present. Santa Ana sucker Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae) is a federally Threatened Species. It is a habitat generalist but prefers sand-rubble-boulder bottoms and cool, clear water and algae. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. Southwestern willow flycatcher Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) is a federally and state Endangered Species. It is found in riparian woodland habitat in southern California. No suitable habitat is present. This species is not present. Coastal California gnatcatcher Coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) is a federally Threatened Species. This bird occupies low, coastal sage scrub in arid washes and on mesas and slopes. No suitable habitat is present. This species is not present. Foothill yellow-legged frog Foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) is a state Endangered Species and a CDFW Species of Special Concern. This species requires cobble-sized substrate for egg-laying and needs at least 15 weeks to attain metamorphosis. No suitable habitat is present. This species is not present. Southern mountain yellow-legged frog Southern mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) is a federally and state Endangered Species and on the CDFW Watch List. This species is aquatic and tadpoles may require up to four years to complete their aquatic development. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Bank swallow Bank swallow (Riparia riparia) is a state Threatened Species. This bird requires vertical banks and cliffs with fine-textured soils near streams, lakes, rivers, and oceans to dig nesting holes. No APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 7 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present. Least Bell’s vireo Least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) is a federally and state Endangered Species. This species is found in riparian forest, riparian scrub, and riparian woodland. Nesting habitat of this species is restricted to willow and/or mulefat dominated riparian scrub along permanent or nearly permanent streams. No suitable habitat is present. This species is not present. 3.6 Critical Habitat The proposed project site is not located within any designated federal critical habitat. The closest federal critical habitat is coastal California gnatcatcher critical habitat located 3.65 miles south of the project site within the Whittier Narrows Natural Area and near the San Gabriel River. 3.7 Migratory Nesting Birds Migratory non-game native bird species are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Additionally, Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code prohibit take of all birds and their active nests. The study area has shrubs and trees near the borders that can be used by nesting songbirds during the nesting bird season of February 1 to September 15. 3.8 Wildlife Movement Corridors Wildlife movement corridors link together areas of suitable habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbances. The project site was evaluated for its function as a wildlife corridor that species would use to move between wildlife habitat zones. Usually, mountain canyons or riparian corridors are used by wildlife as corridors. The project site consists ruderal habitat with surrounding residential development and busy roads. In addition, no jurisdictional waters exist on site. No wildlife movement corridors exist on the project site. 3.9 Jurisdictional Waters No state or federal jurisdictional waters exist on the project site. 4.0 Project Impacts 4.1 Impacts to Habitat Types The project site contains approximately 3.44 acres of ruderal habitat that is expected to be impacted from project implementation (Figure 5). APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 8 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 4.2 Impacts to Sensitive Species The project site is flat and ruderal with sparse non-native vegetation, including shortpod mustard and brome grass. There is residential development, paved roads, and human activity in all directions surrounding the site. Due to the nature of the project site and surrounding development, no sensitive plant or wildlife species have the potential to occur. No impacts to sensitive species are expected. 4.3 Impacts to Migratory Nesting Birds Migratory nongame native bird species are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Additionally, Sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code prohibit take of all birds and their active nests. If vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities can be conducted outside of the recognized nesting bird season (February 15 through September 15), impacts to nesting birds is not expected. If work cannot be avoided during the nesting bird season, prior to initiation of project activities that would remove vegetation or otherwise disturb nesting activity (for instance, mobilization of heavy equipment), work associated with project activities have the potential to impact nesting birds. 4.4 Impacts to Critical Habitat The proposed project site is not located within any designated federal critical habitat. No impacts to critical habitat would occur from project development. 4.5 Impacts to Wildlife Movement Corridors The project site is not located within a designated wildlife corridor or linkage. No wildlife corridors or linkages were found to occur on site. No impacts to wildlife corridors or linkages would occur from project development. 4.6 Conflict with Local Policies or Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources The Los Angeles County Significant Ecological Areas (SEA) program identifies over 60 trees that are protected, including oaks. A Protected Tree Permit is needed for removal of any of the identified trees. The trees on site include tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), Brazilian peppertree, Chinese elm, and glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum). None of these trees occur in the SEA protected tree list. Therefore, no conflict would occur. APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 9 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 4.7 Conflicts with the Provisions of an Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or Other Approved Local, Regional, or State Habitat Conservation Plan The proposed project does not conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved Habitat Conservation Plan. 4.8 Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters No state or federal jurisdictional waters exist within the project site. Therefore, no impacts to jurisdictional waters would occur. 5.0 Recommendations Based upon the findings of this report, it is recommended that the following measures be implemented as part of the project to avoid, minimize, or compensate for the anticipated impacts from project activities: Nesting Birds • If ground disturbing and vegetation clearing activities cannot be avoided during the nesting bird season (February 15 through September 15), a qualified biologist should conduct a pre-construction nesting bird survey within all areas of breeding/nesting habitat within and adjacent to the project site prior to initiation of project activities that would remove vegetation or otherwise disturb nesting activity (for instance, mobilization of heavy equipment). Surveys should be conducted not more than 3 days prior to initiation of activities. • If nesting birds are encountered, a qualified biologist will establish an avoidance buffer zone around the nest (buffer zones vary according to species involved and shall be determined by the qualified biologist). No activities that would adversely affect the nest shall occur within the buffer zone until the qualified biologist has determined the nest is no longer active and the young are no longer dependent on the nest. APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 10 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 6.0 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date 07/11/2022 Signed PROJECT MANAGER Fieldwork Performed By: Sarah Vasquez ASSOCIATE BIOLOGIST Sarah Gulyas ASSOCIATE BIOLOGIST APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 11 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 7.0 REFERENCES American Ornithologists’ Union. 1983 (and supplements 1985, 1987, 1989, 1991, 1993, and 1995). The A.O.U. Check-List of North American Birds. 6th ed. Allen Press. Lawrence, Kansas. Burt, W.H., and Grossenheider, R.P., 1980. Peterson Field Guides, Mammals. Houghton Mifflin Company. New York, New York. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1988a. California’s wildlife, Volume I: Amphibians and Reptiles. State of California Resources Agency. Sacramento, California. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1988b. California’s Wildlife, Volume II: Birds. State of California’s Resource Agency. Sacramento, California. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1988c. California’s Wildlife, Volume III: Mammals. State of California Resources Agency. Sacramento, California. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2014 (October). Natural Communities List. The Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Game, Natural Diversity Data Base. Sacramento, California. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2014 (October). Endangered and Threatened Animals List. The Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Game, Natural Diversity Data Base. Sacramento, California. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2014 (October). Endangered Threatened and Rare Plants. The Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Game, Natural Diversity Data Base. Sacramento, California. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2014 (October). Special Animals List . The Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Game, Natural Diversity Data Base. Sacramento, California. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2015. RareFind On-line program. Data Base Record Search for Information on Threatened, Endangered, Rare, or Otherwise Sensitive Species California Department of Fish and Game, State of California Resources Agency. Sacramento, California. APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 12 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2018. CNDDB MGS Data. The Conservation Strategy for the Mohave Ground Squirrel. The Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Diversity Data Base. Sacramento, California. Department of the Army. 1986 (Nov 13). 33 CFR Parts 320 Through 330, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule. Federal Register 51(219):41206-41206. Department of the Army. 2000 (Mar 9). 33 CFR Parts 320 Through 330, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule. Federal Register 65(47):12818-12899. Department of the Army. 2002 (Jan 15). 33 CFR Parts 320 Through 330, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule. Federal Register 67(10):20020-2095. Hickman, J.C. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press. Berkeley, California. Holland, R.F. 1986 (updated 1996). Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. Non-game Heritage Program. California Department of Fish and Game. Sacramento, California. Munz, P.A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. University of California Press. Berkeley, California. Sawyer, J.O. and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A Manual of California Vegetation. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, California. Spencer, W.D., P. Beier, K. Penrod, K. Winters, C. Paulman, H. Rustigian-Romsos, J. Strittholt, M. Parisi, and A. Pettler. 2010. California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project: A Strategy for Conserving a Connected California. Prepared for California Department of Transportation, California Department of Fish and Game, and Federal Highways Administration. Stebbins, R.C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. 2nd ed. Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston, Massachusetts. Tibor, D.P. 2001. California Native Plant Society’s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. California Native Plant Society. Special Publication, No. 1, 6th ed. APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 General Biological Assessment P a g e | 13 Hernandez Environmental Services 17037 Lakeshore Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Udvardy, M.D. 1994. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Birds. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. New York, New York. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2008. Draft revised recovery plan for the Mojave population of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California and Nevada Region, Sacramento, California. 209 pp. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1993 (Sep 30). Plant Taxa for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species; Notice of Review. Federal Register 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1994 (Nov 15). Endangered or Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Animal Candidate Review for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species. Federal Register 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1997c (Oct. 31). Endangered or Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Federal Register 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C. FIGURE 1 Figure 1 Project Site Boundary Legend N Location Map APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California FIGURE 2 Figure 2 Project Site Boundary Legend N Vicinity Map APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California Project Location FIGURE 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MAIL9 10 11 12 13 20 21 22 23 24 25 14 15 16 17 18 19 38.29' 42.62' 26.17' 26.17' 32.67'32.67' 26.17' 26.17' 33.48' 26.17' 26.17' 32.67 ' 32.67' 26.17 ' 26.17' 38.35'76.50'86.00'76.62'86.14'S89°55'40"W 174.11'S00°56'10"E 542.70'N00°19'33"W 254.20'N28°55'42"E 389.37'S64°1 8 ' 3 2 " E 2 5 0 . 3 7 'S20°14'36"W 169.63'N89°08'21"E 86.93'20.014.08.00 15.0015.3017.2313.23 13.76 20.00 24.00 13.00 20.0014.018.00 20.0020.73 18.0010.0011.5030.009.018.09.018.0 8.00 20.00 5 TYP 5 TYP 19.15 6.020.0038.00 13.00 13.00 20.00 24.00 20.00 TYP 12.1 7 10.17 14.69 11.00 20.003TYP3TYP21.010.0 8.0 13.05 12.03 M M SBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19-52D SBE PAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTS SO CALIF EDISON CO NO SITUS APN: 5389-005-800 QUYEN Y TO 4629 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-042JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043MIKE B TO/TRITIA TO 4623 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-041 WILLIAM J STONECYPHER JR 4617 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-040 CARLOS VILLAGRAN/ KAREN VILLAGRAN 4613 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-039 FENGYI J SITU/TRACY F SITU 4607 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-038 NGO & BANH FAMILY TRUST NGO ALEXANDER D TR 4603 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-037 JASON SAM/FRAUSTINA SAM 4549 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-036 LAIRD ANDERSON/ DONNA B ANDERSON 4545 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-035 BRYANT M TANG 4539 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-034 LENK TRUST LENK JANET M TR 4535 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-033 KOKICHI NAKAZAWA/ SUMIE NAKAZAWA 4529 BARTLETT AVE APN: 5389-009-032 S A N D Y H W U 8 6 3 9 M I S S I O N D R A P N : 5 3 8 9 - 0 0 9 - 0 2 6 DE H O N G 86 3 7 M I S S I O N D R AP N : 5 3 8 9 - 0 0 9 - 0 2 8 DUBOIS F A M I L Y T R U S T DUBOIS W A Y N E A & DOROT H Y A T R S 8635 M I S S I O N D R APN: 53 8 9 - 0 0 9 - 0 2 7 MISS I O N D R I V EWALNUT GROVE AVE.BARTLETT AVE.4040803232886.016.0DU 5 DU 9 DU 7 DU 10 DU 11 DU 12 DU 13 DU 14 DU 15 DU 16 DU 17 DU 20 DU 21 DU 22 DU 23 DU 32 DU 33 DU 31 DU 34 DU 35 DU 24 DU 25 DU 26 DU 27 DU 28 DU 29 DU 30 DU 18 DU 19 DU 1 DU 2 DU 3 DU 6 DU 4 DU 8 DU 36 DU 37 L01 L02 L03 TYP L05 L06 L07 TYP L08 TYP L04 TYP C01 C02 C02 C02 L05 P01 TYP W01 TYP A0.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D ARCHIT E CT C -3 1873 ST ATEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES N 500 100 150 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN &PROJECT STATISTICS ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SFD PLAN 1 2,351 sf SPANISH COLONIAL HACIENDA SFD PLAN 2 2,553 sf "DUPLEX" PLAN 1 1,546 sf "DUPLEX" PLAN 2 1,868 sf VICINITY MAP PROJECT SUMMARY: ·OWNER / APPLICANT:BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC. 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 ·CONTACT:ERIK PFAHLER erik@borsteinenterprises.com 310.582.1991 x203 ·APN:5389-009-029, 030, 031 ·ZONING: ··CURRENT:R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ··PROPOSED:P-D ·GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION ··EXISTING:LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ··PROPOSED:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ·PROJECT SIZE: ··GROSS SF:3.435 AC (149,929 SF) ··NET SF:3.378 AC (147,146 SF) ·LOT SIZE / F.A.R. / LOT COVERAGE: ··LOT 1 (DU 9-37) : 127,151 SF / 67.1% / 43.0% ··LOT 2 (DU 4):3,089 SF / 76.8% / 39.5% ··LOT 3 (DU 3):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0% ··LOT 4 (DU 2):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0% ··LOT 5 (DU 1):2,809 SF / 84.5% / 43.5% ··LOT 6 (DU 5):3,095 SF / 76.7% / 39.5% ··LOT 7 (DU 6):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0% ··LOT 8 (DU 7):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0% ··LOT 9 (DU 8):2,499 SF / 95.0% / 48.9% ·TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNITS:37 DU ··SFD PLAN 1:14 DU ··SFD PLAN 2:15 DU ··DUPLEX PLAN 1:4 DU ··DUPLEX PLAN 2:4 DU ·DENSITY:10.95 DU/AC •OPEN SPACE AREA: 17,298 SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS ·PARKING: ··GARAGE:74 SPACES ··GUEST:25 SPACES ··BICYCLE:2 SPACES ·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE VB ·OCCUPANCY:R-3 SFD/DUPLEX (CRC) ·PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:VARIES: MIN. 390 SF / DU ACHIEVED ·SCHOOL DISTRICT:ROSEMEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT 3907 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD #220 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 626.312.2900 ·ELECTRICAL SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON P.O. BOX 6400 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 800.655.4555 ·GAS SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY P.O. BOX C MONTEREY PARK, CA 91756 800.427.2200 ·WATER SERVICE:CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY 8657 GRAND AVENUE ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 626.614.2500 REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. SITE PLAN LEGEND FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS FIRE HYDRANT (3 PROPOSED) BICYCLE RACK (2 SPACES) CENTRAL COMMON OPEN SPACE 1,644 TOT. SF / 1.1% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SURFACING: TURF OTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE 15,654 TOT. SF / 10.6% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SURFACING: COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING TOTAL OPEN SPACE 17,298 TOT. SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS REAR YARD AREAS 34,359 TOT. SF / 23.4% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS CITY PARKWAY LANDSCAPE 489 TOT. SF / 0.3 % WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SURFACING: PARKWAY LANDSCAPING TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA 51,470 TOT. SF / 34.5% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS R.O.W. HARDSCAPE 1,383 TOT. SF / 0.9% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETE DRIVE AISLE HARDSCAPE 30,810 TOT. SF / 20.9% OF PROJECT SURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETE HARDSCAPE (SIDEWALKS) 9,578 TOT. SF / 6.5% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETE TOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA 40,388 TOT. SF / 27.1% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS 6ft HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM WALL w/ 4in HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM CAP PARKING STALLS TO BE STRIPED PER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17.112.111H TRASH COLLECTION BIN LOCATION PER REPUBLIC SERVICES WILL SERVE LETTER C01 C02 L01 L02 L03 L04 L05 L06 L07 L08 L09 P01 W01 DWELLING UNIT LEGEND SPANISH COLONIAL HACIENDA SANDY H WU 8639 MISSION DR APN: 5389-009-026 DE HONG 8637 MISSION DR APN: 5389-009-028 DUBOIS FAMILY TRUST DUBOIS WAYNE A & DOROTHY A TRS 8635 MISSION DR APN: 5389-009-027 EQ EQEQ EQ10'-0 " EQ EQ EQ EQ90°130' - 3 3 / 8 " REQ S Y S T B K : 1 3 . 0 ' 10'-0 " 90° 9'-4 3/8" REQ. SY STBK: 9.36'EQEQEQ EQ 10'-1 5/8" REQ. SY STBK: 10.14'EQEQEQEQ 90° GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 26-80A23 60-50SL60-50SL 50-50SL 26-68 A24200 1234 67 5 121314151716 891011 30-80 SC 24-80 24-80 24-80 30-50SH 50-68 BIPASS50-50SL 26-80 26-6890-80FOLDING DR GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 26-80A23 60-50SL 60-50SL50-50SL 26-68 A24200 1 23 4 67 5 121314151716 89 1011 30-80 SC 24-80 24-80 24-80 30-50SH 50-68 BIPAS S50-50SL 26-80 26-68 90-80FOLDING DR 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR34568791011121415 16 171312 30-50 SH30-50SH26-8026-80A2324-8024-8030-80 SC60-50SL 60-50SL50-50SL50-50SL26-68A24 20090-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH 40-50SL##-#########160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3456 87 9 10 1112 14 1516 17 13 12 30-50SH 30-50SH26-8026-80A23 24-80 24-80 30-80 SC60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50 SL 50-50SL2 6-68A24 200 90-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH 40-50SL##-#########GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT . G AR . D R 26-80 A23 60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50 SL 26-68 A24200 1234675 1213 1415 1716 891011 30-80 SC 24-8024-80 24-8030-50SH 50-68 BIPASS 50-50SL 26-80 26-68 90-80FOLD I NG DR160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3 45 6 879 1011 12 1415 16171312 30-50SH26-8026-80A23 24-80 24-8030-80 SC 60-50SL60-50SL50-50 SL 50-50SL 26-68A2420090-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH40-50SL##-###########-##SL160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3 45 6 879 10111214151617131230-50SH26-80 26-80A23 24-8024-80 30-80 SC 60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50 SL50-50SL26 -68A2420090-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH40-50SL##-##### # # # # ##-##SL GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE 160-70 SEC T . GA R . D R 26-80 A23 60-50SL 60-50SL50-50SL 26-68A24 200 1234675 12 1314 15 17 16 891011 30-80 SC 24-8024-80 24-80 30-50SH 50-68 BIPASS50-50 SL 26-80 26-68 90-80FOLDIN G D R 160-70 SE C T . G A R . D R 3456879101112 14 1516 17 13 12 30-50SH 30-50SH 26-80 26-80A2324-8024-80 30-80 SC60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL50-50SL26-68A2420090-80FOLD I N G D R24-8020-40SH40-50 SL##-#########GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT . G AR . DR 26-80A23 60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL 26-68A24 200 1234675 1213 1415 1716 891011 30-80 SC 24-8024-80 24-80 30-50 SH 50-68 BIPASS 50-50SL 26-80 26-68 90-80FOLDI NG DR 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3 45 6 8 7 9 1011 12 1415 1617 13 1230-50SH26-8026-80A2324-80 24-80 30-80 SC60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL50-50SL26-68A24 200 90-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH 40-50SL##-###########-##SL GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SEC T . GA R . D R 26-80 A23 60-50SL 60-50SL50-50SL 26-68A24200 123467512 1314 15 17 16 891011 30-80 SC 24-8024-80 24-80 30-50SH 50-68 BIPASS 50-50 SL 26-80 26-68 90-80FOLD I NG D R 160-70 SECT . G A R. DR 34 56 87 910 111214 1516 17 13 12 30-50SH 30-50SH 26-80 26-80A23 24-80 24-80 30-80 SC 60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50 SL 50-50SL26-68 A24200 90-80FOLD IN G D R 24-80 20-40SH 40-50SL ##-###### ###GASELECM&P TELE/CABLE160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80 A2360-50SL60-50SL 50-50SL26-68 A242001234675 12131415 1716 891011 30-80 SC 24-80 24-8024-80 30-50SH 50-68 BIP AS S 50-50SL26-8026-6890-80FOLDING DR160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3456 87 910 1112 14 1516 1713 1230-50SH26-80 26-80 A23 24-8024-80 30-80 SC60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL50-50SL26-68 A24 20090-80FOLDING DR 24-8020-40SH 40-50SL##-###########-##SL 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR34 5687910111214151617131230-50SH30-50SH26-80 26-80A2324-8024-8030-80 SC60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL50-50SL26-68A2420090-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH40-50SL##-#########GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80 A2360-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL26-68 A24200 1234 67 5 12 13 1415 1716 891011 30-80 SC 24-8024-80 24-8030-50SH 50-68 BIPASS 50-50 SL26-8026-68 90-80FOLDING DR GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT . G A R . D R 26-80 A2360-50SL60-50SL50-50SL26-68A24 2001 23 4675 1213 1415 171689101130-80 SC24-80 24-80 24-8030-50SH50-68 BIPASS50-50SL26-80 26-68 90-80FOLDING DRGASELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80 A2360-50SL60-50SL 50-50SL26-68A2420012 34 6 751213141517168 910 1130-80 SC 24-80 24-8024-8030-50SH50-68 BIPASS50-50 SL 26-8026-68 90-80FOLDING DR160-70 SECT . G AR . D R 3456 8 7910 1112 14 1516 17 13 12 30-50SH30-50SH 26-8026-80A23 24-8024-8030-80 SC60-50SL60-50SL 50-50SL 50-50SL 26-68A24 200 90-80FOLD I N G D R 24-8020-40SH40-50SL ##-##### # ### 160-70 SEC T . G AR . D R 3 45 6 8 7 9 1011 12 1415 1617 13 12 30-50SH26-8026-80A23 24-8024-8030-80 SC60-50SL60-50SL50-50 SL 50-50SL 26-68A24200 90-80FOLDIN G DR 24-8020-40SH 40-50SL ##-####### ####-##SLGASELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80A2360-50SL 60-50SL50-50 SL 26-68A24 20012 34 6 75 1213 1415 1716 8 910 11 30-80 SC24-80 24-8024-8030-50SH 50-68 BIPASS 50-50SL26-8026-68 90-80FOLDI N G DR 160-70 SEC T. GA R . DR 34 56 87 910 1112 14 1516 17 13 12 30-50 SH 30-50SH26-8026-80A23 24-80 24-80 30-80 SC 60-50SL 60-50SL50-50SL 50-50SL 26-68A24 200 90-80FOLD I NG D R 24-80 20-40SH40-50SL ##-##### ### # 160-70 SECT. GAR. D R 345687910111214151617 13 12 30-50SH 26-80 26-80A23 24-80 24-80 30-80 SC 60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL 50-50SL 26-68 A24200 90-80FOLDING D R 24-80 20-40SH 40-50SL ##-####### # # ##-##SLGASELECM&P TELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80 A2360-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL26-68A2420012 346751213141517168 9101130-80 SC24-8024-8024-8030-50SH50-68 BIPASS 50-50SL26-8026-6890-80FOLDING DRGAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. G A R . D R 26-80A23 60-50SL60-50SL50-50SL 26-68A24200 1234 67 5 121314151716 891011 30-80 SC24-80 24-80 24-80 30-50SH50-68 BIPASS 50-50SL 26-80 26-68 90-80FOLDIN G D R 160-70 SECT. GAR. D R 345 687 910 11 12 14 1516 17131230-50SH26-80 26-80A23 24-8024-80 30-80 SC 60-50SL60-50SL 50-50SL50-50SL26-68 A24 20090-80FOLDING DR24-80 20-40SH 40-50 SL##-###########-##SL160-70 SECT. G A R . D R 345687910111214151617 13 12 30-50SH30-50SH26-8026-80A23 24-8024-8030-80 SC 60-50SL60-50SL50-50SL 50-50SL 26-68A24 200 90-80FOLDIN G D R 24-80 20-40SH40-50SL ##-###### # # # GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 1 234 6510111213151617 1426-80 A23 20060-80 SGD 60-50SL60-50SL 7 8910 24-8030-80 SC24-80 24-8020-40SH160-70 SECT . G A R . D R 60-50SL891011 1314 12 1234 675 151617 24-80 26-80A23 200 80-80 SGD50-50SL 30-80 SC 40-50SL24-8024-80 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 60-50SL 891011 1314 12 1234 67515161724-8026-80 A2320080-80 SGD50-50SL 30-80 SC40-50SL24-8024-80GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. G A R . D R 123465 10111213 151617 14 26-80A23 200 60-80 SGD60-50SL60-50SL 78910 24-80 30-80 SC 24-80 24-80 20-40SH 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 60-50SL 891011 1314 12 123 4 6 7 5 151617 24-80 26-80 A23 200 80-80 SGD 50-50SL 30-80 SC 40-50SL24-80 24-80GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR123 4 65101112131516171426-80 A2320060-80 SGD 60-50SL 60-50SL7891024-8030-80 SC24-8024-8020-40SHGAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE160-70 SECT. GAR . D R 123465 10111213 151617 14 26-80A23 200 60-80 SGD60-50SL 60-50SL 78910 24-80 30-80 SC24-80 24-80 20-40SH 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR60-50SL 89101113 14121 234675 15161724-8026-80A2320080-80 SGD 50-50SL30-80 SC40-50SL24-80 24-80GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABL E 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 26-80A23 60-50SL 60-50SL 50-50SL26-68A24200 1234 67 5 121314151716 891011 30-80 SC24 -8024-8024-80 30-50SH 50-68 BIPA SS50-50SL 26-80 26-6890-80FOLDING DR 5 9 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 32 33 31 34 35 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 18 19 1 2 3 6 4 8 36 37 A0.1.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES PHASING MAP /SETBACK DETERMINATION IRREGULAR LOT SETBACK DETERMINATION EXHIBIT (SOUTHEAST CONTIGUOUS NEIGHBORING LOTS) CONSTRUCTION PHASING MAP PHASE 2PHASE 1 GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE53'-0"31'-0" 21'-0"7'-9" 31'-0"6'-8"53'-0"20'-112"26'-212"GREAT ROOM 30'-5" x 20'-6" BEDROOM 4 11'-0" x 11'-0" BA. 3 PANTRY STORAGE GARAGE 20'-5" x 20'-1"STORAGE/TRASH 2'-3"20'-112"20'-5" 2'-3"5'-2"15'-212"53'-0"31'-0"46'-612"6'-512"53'-0"4'-012"16'-1112"2'-3" 31'-0" 17'-1112"13'-012"4'-0"28'-712"7'-9" BEDROOM 2 10'-0" x 11'-0" BEDROOM 3 10'-0" x 11'-0" LOFT 11'-1" x 8'-8" LAUNDRY BA. 2 MBA W.I.C. MASTER BEDROOM 17'-4" x 14'-6"MORNINGW.I.C. TECH/LIBRARY A1.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES FLOOR PLAN 40 8 12 AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE (ELEV. A & B) FIRST FLOOR:1026 SF SECOND FLOOR:1,325 SF TOTAL CONDITIONED:2,351 SF UNCONDITIONED SPACE (ELEV. A & B) GARAGE:489 SF COVERED PORCH:9 SF TOTAL UNCONDITIONED:498 SF SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN 1 SFD 9'-1"9'-1"25'-3"100305410 200 210 215215111140 300 500 101 710 410 100 300 305210410500 200110 101 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:12 4:124:124:12 4:12 4:12 410500100210410101 100 210 410200 101 A1.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES SPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN 40 8 12 FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION ROOF PLAN PLAN 1 SFD EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND 100: BUILDING COMPONENTS CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE WOOD FASCIA BOARD ENTRY DOOR METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE 200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM 300: PAINTED DETAILS PAINTED SHUTTER PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS 400: EXTERIOR WOOD RAFTER TAIL POT SHELF OUTLOOKER / BRACKET CORBEL 500: EXTERIOR METAL POT SHELF 600: EXTERIOR VENEERS ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER 700: MISCELLANEOUS DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL 100 101 110 111 140 200 210 215 220 300 305 400 405 410 415 500 600 700 710 9'-1"9'-1"25'-3"100710 200 210 415210111140 300 405 600 400 101 220 410 100 300210 200600405415 400 101 110 10'-11"4:12 4:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:12 4:124:124:124:124:12 405100210410400101 100 210 410200 101 A1.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES HACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN 40 8 12 FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION ROOF PLAN PLAN 1 SFD EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND 100: BUILDING COMPONENTS CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE WOOD FASCIA BOARD ENTRY DOOR METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE 200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM 300: PAINTED DETAILS PAINTED SHUTTER PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS 400: EXTERIOR WOOD RAFTER TAIL POT SHELF OUTLOOKER / BRACKET CORBEL 500: EXTERIOR METAL POT SHELF 600: EXTERIOR VENEERS ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER 700: MISCELLANEOUS DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL 100 101 110 111 140 200 210 215 220 300 305 400 405 410 415 500 600 700 710 GREAT ROOM 30'-5" x 24'-10" GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE53'-0"31'-0" BEDROOM 4 10'-0" x 12'-6" BA. 3 PANTRY STO. / COATS GARAGE 20'-1" x 20'-9" 20'-8"10'-4" 31'-0"50'-0"3'-0"53'-0"24'-1012"5'-6"19'-712"20'-912"20'-1"22'-1112"3'-0" BEDROOM 2 12'-4" x 11'-0" BEDROOM 3 10'-0" x 12'-0" LOFT 13'-10" x 12'-4" LAUNDRY BA. 2 MBA W.I.C. MASTER BEDROOM 17'-2" x 14'-2" LINEN 8'-0"45'-0"53'-0"31'-0"40'-812"12'-312"53'-0"7'-912"12'-1012"10'-4" 31'-0" TECH LINEN A2.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES FLOOR PLAN 40 8 12 AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR:1129 SF SECOND FLOOR:1,424 SF TOTAL CONDITIONED:2,553 SF UNCONDITIONED SPACE GARAGE:467 SF COVERED PORCH:16 SF TOTAL UNCONDITIONED:483 SF SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN 2 SFD 9'-1"9'-1"27'-2"100305410 200 210 700215111140 300 500 410 101 710 410 100 300 305 210410500 200 500 101 110 4:12 4:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:124:12 4:12 410500100210410305101 100 210 410200 300101 A2.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES SPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN 40 8 12 FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION ROOF PLAN PLAN 2 SFD EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND 100: BUILDING COMPONENTS CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE WOOD FASCIA BOARD ENTRY DOOR METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE 200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM 300: PAINTED DETAILS PAINTED SHUTTER PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS 400: EXTERIOR WOOD RAFTER TAIL POT SHELF OUTLOOKER / BRACKET CORBEL 500: EXTERIOR METAL POT SHELF 600: EXTERIOR VENEERS ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER 700: MISCELLANEOUS DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL 100 101 110 111 140 200 210 215 220 300 305 400 405 410 415 500 600 700 710 9'-1"9'-1"27'-2"100 710 200 210 600210111140 300 405 400 710215 101 220 410 100 300210 200600 400 405 710 101 110 4:12 4:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:124:124:12 4:12 710 210410 400100 215 101 100 210 410200 400 300 101 A2.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES HACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN 40 8 12 FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION ROOF PLAN PLAN 2 SFD EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND 100: BUILDING COMPONENTS CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE WOOD FASCIA BOARD ENTRY DOOR METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE 200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM 300: PAINTED DETAILS PAINTED SHUTTER PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS 400: EXTERIOR WOOD RAFTER TAIL POT SHELF OUTLOOKER / BRACKET CORBEL 500: EXTERIOR METAL POT SHELF 600: EXTERIOR VENEERS ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER 700: MISCELLANEOUS DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL 100 101 110 111 140 200 210 215 220 300 305 400 405 410 415 500 600 700 710 GASELECM&PTELE/CABLEGAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLEGREAT ROOM 20'-5" x 23'-3" PDR COATS STORAGE GARAGE 20'-5" x 20'-3" PNTRY GREAT ROOM 23'-5" x 25'-0" PDR GARAGE 21'-5" x 20'-3" RECYCLE PNTRY TRASH DROP GREEN 45'-4" 1'-0"10"24'-0"4"21'-0" 13'-6"7'-6"1'-0"8'-1012"8'-11"17'-112"17'-1"53'-0"1'-0"2'-10"10'-7"10'-11"27'-8"53'-0"1'-0"21'-0"4"22'-0"2'-0"10" 45'-4"20'-312"21'-5"20'-5"20'-312"2'-8" 3'-0" GREENTRASHRECYCLE STORAGE STORAGE A3.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES BUILDING PLAN 40 8 12 AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR:586 SF SECOND FLOOR:960 SF TOTAL CONDITIONED:1,546 SF UNCONDITIONED SPACE GARAGE:475 SF COVERED PORCH:12 SF TOTAL UNCONDITIONED:487 SF FIRST FLOOR DUPLEX BUILDING PLAN AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR:716 SF SECOND FLOOR:1,152 SF TOTAL CONDITIONED:1,868 SF UNCONDITIONED SPACE GARAGE:488 SF COVERED PORCH:17 SF TOTAL UNCONDITIONED:505 SF DUPLEX PLAN 1 PLAN 2 BEDROOM 2 10'-0" x 11'-0" BEDROOM 3 10'-0" x 11'-0" LOFT 11'-1" x 8'-1" LAUNDRY BA. 2 MBA W.I.C. MASTER BEDROOM 14'-5" x 13'-0"LINENBEDROOM 2 10'-6" x 11'-0" BEDROOM 3 10'-7" x 11'-3" LOFT / BR. 4 12'-8" x 11'-1" LAUNDRY BA. 2 MBA W.I.C. MASTER BEDROOM 12'-1" x 15'-7"LINEN45'-4" 24'-0"4"21'-0" 13'-6"7'-6"28'-8"1'-0"53'-0"1'-0"2'-10"45'-8"3'-6"53'-0"11'-112"4"10'-1012"2'-0" 45'-4" 11'-112"9'-1012"23'-4"BEDROOM 4 10'-1" x 11'-1" A3.1.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES BUILDING PLAN 40 8 12 DUPLEX SECOND FLOOR DUPLEX BUILDING PLAN PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 BEDROOM 4 OPT. 140 140 9'-1"9'-1"27'-10"9'-1"9'-1"27'-10"100 410305 500300210 200 111 210 140 410 101 200 700 100 305 410300500210101 110 100 300500305410210 101 215 200200700 100305 410300500210 410110 101 A3.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES SPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 40 8 12 FRONT ELEVATION DUPLEX ENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 2) REAR / MISSION DRIVE ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 1) EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND 100: BUILDING COMPONENTS CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE WOOD FASCIA BOARD ENTRY DOOR METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE 200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM 300: PAINTED DETAILS PAINTED SHUTTER PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS 400: EXTERIOR WOOD RAFTER TAIL POT SHELF OUTLOOKER / BRACKET CORBEL 500: EXTERIOR METAL POT SHELF 600: EXTERIOR VENEERS ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER 700: MISCELLANEOUS DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL 100 101 110 111 140 200 210 215 220 300 305 400 405 410 415 500 600 700 710 140 140 9'-1"9'-1"27'-10"9'-1"9'-1"27'-10"100 400 405300210 200 111 210 140 400 101 600 210200220 100 710300405210 101 600110 415 100 300405710210 101 415 200 600200220 100710 300 405210 110 400 210 101 A3.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES HACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 40 8 12 FRONT ELEVATION DUPLEX ENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 2) REAR / MISSION DRIVE ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 1) EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND 100: BUILDING COMPONENTS CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE WOOD FASCIA BOARD ENTRY DOOR METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE 200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM 300: PAINTED DETAILS PAINTED SHUTTER PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS 400: EXTERIOR WOOD RAFTER TAIL POT SHELF OUTLOOKER / BRACKET CORBEL 500: EXTERIOR METAL POT SHELF 600: EXTERIOR VENEERS ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER 700: MISCELLANEOUS DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL 100 101 110 111 140 200 210 215 220 300 305 400 405 410 415 500 600 700 710 4:124:124:12 4:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:12 4:124:124:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:12 1'-4"1'-4"1'-4"4:12 4:124:124:12 4:128:12A3.3.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354 949 939 1310 www.architeyk.com A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS DATE SHEET NO. JOB NO. A R C H I T E Y K 29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT E CT C -3 1873 S T A TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA BE-21-001 220516 11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 310.582.1991 BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES ROOF PLANS 40 8 12 SPANISH COLONIAL ROOF PLAN DUPLEX HACIENDA ROOF PLAN FIGURE 4 Figure 4 Project Site Boundary Legend N Habitat Map APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California Ruderal Habitat (3.44 Ac.) FIGURE 5 Figure 5 Project Site Boundary Legend N Impact Map APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031 City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California Ruderal Habitat (3.44 Ac.) APPENDIX A Observed Species List Plant List Scientific Name Common Name Acmispon americanus Spanish clover Ailanthus altissima Tree of heaven Bromus madritensis Red brome Chenopodium album White goosefoot Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass Erodium cicutarium Redstem filaree Euphorbia maculate Spotted spurge Ficus pumila Creeping fig Heterotheca grandiflora Telegraphweed Hirschfeldia incana Shortpod mustard Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce Ligustrum lucidum Glossy privet Malva parviflora Cheeseweed Nerium oleander Oleander Plumbago auriculata Cape leadwort Salsola tragus Tumbleweed Schinus terebinthifolia Brazilian peppertree Tribulus terrestris Puncture vine Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm Vitis californica California wild grape Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm Wildlife List Scientific Name Common Name Aphelocoma californica California scrub jay Bombus sp. Bumblebee Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow Danaus plexippus Monarch butterfly Falco sparverius American kestrel Melozone crissalis California towhee Mimus polyglottos Northern mockingbird Pontia protodice Checkered white butterfly Streptopelia decaocto Eurasian collared dove APPENDIX B Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. gabrielensis San Gabriel manzanita Dicots None None 1B.2 Chaparral Chaparral. Rocky outcrops; can be dominant shrub where it occurs. 960- 2015 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Astragalus brauntonii Braunton's milk-vetch Dicots Endangered None 1B.1 Chaparral | Coastal scrub | Limestone | Valley & foothill grassland Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Recent burns or disturbed areas; usually on sandstone with carbonate layers. Soil specialist; requires shallow soils to defeat pocket gophers and open areas, preferably on hilltops, saddles or bowls between hills. 3-640 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Atriplex parishii Parish's brittlescale Dicots None None 1B.1 Alkali playa | Chenopod scrub | Meadow & seep | Vernal pool | Wetland Vernal pools, chenopod scrub, playas. Usually on drying alkali flats with fine soils. 4-1420 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Atriplex serenana var. davidsonii Davidson's saltscale Dicots None None 1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub | Coastal scrub Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub. Alkaline soil. 0- 480 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Berberis nevinii Nevin's barberry Dicots Endangered Endangered 1B.1 Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Riparian scrub Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, riparian scrub. On steep, N- facing slopes or in low grade sandy washes. 90-1590 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. California Walnut Woodland California Walnut Woodland Woodland None None Cismontane woodland Not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Calochortus clavatus var. gracilis slender mariposa-lily Monocots None None 1B.2 Chaparral | Coastal scrub | Valley & foothill grassland Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Shaded foothill canyons; often on grassy slopes within other habitat. 210-1815 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Calochortus plummerae Plummer's mariposa-lily Monocots None None 4.2 Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Lower montane coniferous forest | Valley & foothill grassland Coastal scrub, chaparral, valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest. Occurs on rocky and sandy sites, usually of granitic or alluvial material. Can be very common after fire. 60-2500 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Calochortus weedii var. intermedius intermediate mariposa-lily Monocots None None 1B.2 Chaparral | Coastal scrub | Valley & foothill grassland Coastal scrub, chaparral, valley and foothill grassland. Dry, rocky calcareous slopes and rock outcrops. 60-1575 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Calystegia felix lucky morning- glory Dicots None None 1B.1 Meadow & seep | Riparian scrub Meadows and seeps, riparian scrub. Sometimes alkaline, alluvial. 9-205 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Canyon Live Oak Ravine Forest Canyon Live Oak Ravine Forest Riparian None None Riparian forest Not present. Centromadia parryi ssp. australis southern tarplant Dicots None None 1B.1 Marsh & swamp | Salt marsh | Valley & foothill grassland | Vernal pool | Wetland Marshes and swamps (margins), valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Often in disturbed sites near the coast at marsh edges; also in alkaline soils sometimes with saltgrass. Sometimes on vernal pool margins. 0-975 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Centromadia pungens ssp. laevis smooth tarplant Dicots None None 1B.1 Alkali playa | Chenopod scrub | Meadow & seep | Riparian woodland | Valley & foothill grassland | Wetland Valley and foothill grassland, chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, playas, riparian woodland. Alkali meadow, alkali scrub; also in disturbed places. 5-1170 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi Parry's spineflower Dicots None None 1B.1 Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Valley & foothill grassland Coastal scrub, chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Dry slopes and flats; sometimes at interface of 2 vegetation types, such as chaparral and oak woodland. Dry, sandy soils. 90-1220 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Cladium californicum California saw- grass Monocots None None 2B.2 Alkali marsh | Freshwater marsh | Meadow & seep | Wetland Meadows and seeps, marshes and swamps (alkaline or freshwater). Freshwater or alkaline moist habitats. -40- 2150 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Cuscuta obtusiflora var. glandulosa Peruvian dodder Dicots None None 2B.2 Marsh & swamp | Wetland Marshes and swamps (freshwater). Freshwater marsh. 15-280 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Dodecahema leptoceras slender- horned spineflower Dicots Endangered Endangered 1B.1 Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub (alluvial fan sage scrub). Flood deposited terraces and washes; associates include Encelia, Dalea, Lepidospartum , etc. Sandy soils. 200-765 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Dudleya cymosa ssp. crebrifolia San Gabriel River dudleya Dicots None None 1B.2 Chaparral Chaparral. On granite cliffs and outcrops, surrounded by scrub. 365- 1250 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Dudleya densiflora San Gabriel Mountains dudleya Dicots None None 1B.1 Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Lower montane coniferous forest | Riparian forest Chaparral, coastal scrub, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, riparian forest. In crevices and on decomposed granite on cliffs and canyon walls. 270-1100 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Dudleya multicaulis many- stemmed dudleya Dicots None None 1B.2 Chaparral | Coastal scrub | Valley & foothill grassland Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. In heavy, often clayey soils or grassy slopes. 1-910 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Galium grande San Gabriel bedstraw Dicots None None 1B.2 Broadleaved upland forest | Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Lower montane coniferous forest Cismontane woodland, chaparral, broadleafed upland forest, lower montane coniferous forest. Open chaparral and low, open oak forest; on rocky slopes; probably undercollected due to inaccessible habitat. 425- 1450 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Helianthus nuttallii ssp. parishii Los Angeles sunflower Dicots None None 1A Freshwater marsh | Marsh & swamp | Salt marsh | Wetland Marshes and swamps (coastal salt and freshwater). 35-1525 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Horkelia cuneata var. puberula mesa horkelia Dicots None None 1B.1 Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub. Sandy or gravelly sites. 15-1645 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Imperata brevifolia California satintail Monocots None None 2B.1 Chaparral | Coastal scrub | Meadow & seep | Mojavean desert scrub | Riparian scrub | Wetland Coastal scrub, chaparral, riparian scrub, mojavean desert scrub, meadows and seeps (alkali), riparian scrub. Mesic sites, alkali seeps, riparian areas. 3-1495 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri Coulter's goldfields Dicots None None 1B.1 Alkali playa | Marsh & swamp | Salt marsh | Vernal pool | Wetland Coastal salt marshes, playas, vernal pools. Usually found on alkaline soils in playas, sinks, and grasslands. 1- 1375 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Lepidium virginicum var. robinsonii Robinson's pepper-grass Dicots None None 4.3 Chaparral | Coastal scrub Chaparral, coastal scrub. Dry soils, shrubland. 4- 1435 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Linanthus concinnus San Gabriel linanthus Dicots None None 1B.2 Chaparral | Lower montane coniferous forest | Upper montane coniferous forest Lower montane coniferous forest, upper montane coniferous forest, chaparral. Dry rocky slopes, often in Jeffrey pine/canyon oak forest. 1310-2560 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Muhlenbergia californica California muhly Monocots None None 4.3 Chaparral | Coastal scrub | Lower montane coniferous forest | Meadow & seep Coastal scrub, chaparral, lower montane coniferous forest, meadows and seeps. Usually found near streams or seeps. 100- 2000 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Navarretia prostrata prostrate vernal pool navarretia Dicots None None 1B.2 Coastal scrub | Meadow & seep | Valley & foothill grassland | Vernal pool | Wetland Coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools, meadows and seeps. Alkaline soils in grassland, or in vernal pools. Mesic, alkaline sites. 3-1235 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Open Engelmann Oak Woodland Open Engelmann Oak Woodland Woodland None None Cismontane woodland Not present. Orcuttia californica California Orcutt grass Monocots Endangered Endangered 1B.1 Vernal pool | Wetland Vernal pools.10-660 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Orobanche valida ssp. valida Rock Creek broomrape Dicots None None 1B.2 Chaparral | Pinon & juniper woodlands Chaparral, pinyon and juniper woodland. On slopes of loose decomposed granite; parasitic on various chaparral shrubs. 975- 1985 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Phacelia stellaris Brand's star phacelia Dicots None None 1B.1 Coastal dunes | Coastal scrub Coastal scrub, coastal dunes. Open areas. 3- 370 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Pseudognapha lium leucocephalu m white rabbit- tobacco Dicots None None 2B.2 Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Riparian woodland Riparian woodland, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, chaparral. Sandy, gravelly sites. 35-515 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Ribes divaricatum var. parishii Parish's gooseberry Dicots None None 1A Riparian woodland Riparian woodland. Salix swales in riparian habitats. 65- 300 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Scrub None None Coastal scrub Not present. Scutellaria bolanderi ssp. austromontan a southern mountains skullcap Dicots None None 1B.2 Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Lower montane coniferous forest Chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest. In gravelly soils on streambanks or in mesic sites in oak or pine woodland. 425- 2000 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Sidalcea neomexicana salt spring checkerbloom Dicots None None 2B.2 Alkali playa | Chaparral | Coastal scrub | Lower montane coniferous forest | Mojavean desert scrub | Wetland Playas, chaparral, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest, Mojavean desert scrub. Alkali springs and marshes. 3- 2380 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Southern California Arroyo Chub/Santa Ana Sucker Stream Southern California Arroyo Chub/Santa Ana Sucker Stream Inland Waters None None Not present. Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest Riparian None None Riparian forest Not present. Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland Riparian None None Riparian woodland Not present. Symphyotrichu m defoliatum San Bernardino aster Dicots None None 1B.2 Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Lower montane coniferous forest | Marsh & swamp | Meadow & seep | Valley & foothill grassland Meadows and seeps, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest, marshes and swamps, valley and foothill grassland. Vernally mesic grassland or near ditches, streams and springs; disturbed areas. 3-2045 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant Rank Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Symphyotrichu m greatae Greata's aster Dicots None None 1B.3 Broadleaved upland forest | Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Lower montane coniferous forest | Riparian woodland Chaparral, cismontane woodland, broadleafed upland forest, lower montane coniferous forest, riparian woodland. Mesic canyons. 335- 2015 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Thelypteris puberula var. sonorensis Sonoran maiden fern Ferns None None 2B.2 Meadow & seep | Wetland Meadows and seeps. Along streams, seepage areas. 60-930 m. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Walnut Forest Walnut Forest Forest None None Broadleaved upland forest Not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk Birds None None CDFW_WL- Watch List | IUCN_LC-Least Concern Cismontane woodland | Riparian forest | Riparian woodland | Upper montane coniferous forest Woodland, chiefly of open, interrupted or marginal type. Nest sites mainly in riparian growths of deciduous trees, as in canyon bottoms on river flood- plains; also, live oaks. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Aimophila ruficeps canescens southern California rufous- crowned sparrow Birds None None CDFW_WL- Watch List Chaparral | Coastal scrub Resident in Southern California coastal sage scrub and sparse mixed chaparral. Frequents relatively steep, often rocky hillsides with grass and forb patches. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Ammodramus savannarum grasshopper sparrow Birds None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern Valley & foothill grassland Dense grasslands on rolling hills, lowland plains, in valleys and on hillsides on lower mountain slopes. Favors native grasslands with a mix of grasses, forbs and scattered shrubs. Loosely colonial when nesting. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Anaxyrus californicus arroyo toad Amphibians Endangered None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_EN- Endangered Desert wash | Riparian scrub | Riparian woodland | South coast flowing waters | South coast standing waters Semi-arid regions near washes or intermittent streams, including valley-foothill and desert riparian, desert wash, etc. Rivers with sandy banks, willows, cottonwoods, and sycamores; loose, gravelly areas of streams in drier parts of range. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Anniella stebbinsi Southern California legless lizard Reptiles None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | USFS_S- Sensitive Broadleaved upland forest | Chaparral | Coastal dunes | Coastal scrub Generally south of the Transverse Range, extending to northwestern Baja California. Occurs in sandy or loose loamy soils under sparse vegetation. Disjunct populations in the Tehachapi and Piute Mountains in Kern County. Variety of habitats; generally in moist, loose soil. They prefer soils with a high moisture content. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Antrozous pallidus pallid bat Mammals None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | USFS_S- Sensitive | WBWG_H- High Priority Chaparral | Coastal scrub | Desert wash | Great Basin grassland | Great Basin scrub | Mojavean desert scrub | Riparian woodland | Sonoran desert scrub | Upper montane coniferous forest | Valley & foothill grassland Deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands and forests. Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting. Roosts must protect bats from high temperatures. Very sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Arizona elegans occidentalis California glossy snake Reptiles None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern Patchily distributed from the eastern portion of San Francisco Bay, southern San Joaquin Valley, and the Coast, Transverse, and Peninsular ranges, south to Baja California. Generalist reported from a range of scrub and grassland habitats, often with loose or sandy soils. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri coastal whiptail Reptiles None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern Found in deserts and semi-arid areas with sparse vegetation and open areas. Also found in woodland and riparian areas. Ground may be firm soil, sandy, or rocky. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Athene cunicularia burrowing owl Birds None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | USFWS_BCC- Birds of Conservation Concern Coastal prairie | Coastal scrub | Great Basin grassland | Great Basin scrub | Mojavean desert scrub | Sonoran desert scrub | Valley & foothill grassland Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts, and scrublands characterized by low- growing vegetation. Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Bombus crotchii Crotch bumble bee Insects None None Coastal California east to the Sierra- Cascade crest and south into Mexico. Food plant genera include Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, and Eriogonum. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Buteo swainsoni Swainson's hawk Birds None Threatened BLM_S- Sensitive | IUCN_LC-Least Concern Great Basin grassland | Riparian forest | Riparian woodland | Valley & foothill grassland Breeds in grasslands with scattered trees, juniper- sage flats, riparian areas, savannahs, and agricultural or ranch lands with groves or lines of trees. Requires adjacent suitable foraging areas such as grasslands, or alfalfa or grain fields supporting rodent populations. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Campylorhync hus brunneicapillu s sandiegensis coastal cactus wren Birds None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | USFS_S- Sensitive | USFWS_BCC- Birds of Conservation Concern Coastal scrub Southern California coastal sage scrub. Wrens require tall opuntia cactus for nesting and roosting. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Catostomus santaanae Santa Ana sucker Fish Threatened None AFS_TH- Threatened | IUCN_VU- Vulnerable Aquatic | South coast flowing waters Endemic to Los Angeles Basin south coastal streams. Habitat generalists, but prefer sand-rubble- boulder bottoms, cool, clear water, and algae. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Coccyzus americanus occidentalis western yellow-billed cuckoo Birds Threatened Endangered BLM_S- Sensitive | NABCI_RWL- Red Watch List | USFS_S- Sensitive Riparian forest Riparian forest nester, along the broad, lower flood- bottoms of larger river systems. Nests in riparian jungles of willow, often mixed with cottonwoods, with lower story of blackberry, nettles, or wild grape. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Corynorhinus townsendii Townsend's big-eared bat Mammals None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | USFS_S- Sensitive | WBWG_H- High Priority Broadleaved upland forest | Chaparral | Chenopod scrub | Great Basin grassland | Great Basin scrub | Joshua tree woodland | Lower montane coniferous forest | Meadow & seep | Mojavean desert scrub | Riparian forest | Riparian woodland | Sonoran desert scrub | Sonoran thorn woodland | Upper montane coniferous Throughout California in a wide variety of habitats. Most common in mesic sites. Roosts in the open, hanging from walls and ceilings. Roosting sites limiting. Extremely sensitive to human disturbance. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Cypseloides niger black swift Birds None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | NABCI_YWL- Yellow Watch List | USFWS_BCC- Birds of Conservation Concern Coastal belt of Santa Cruz and Monterey counties; central and southern Sierra Nevada; San Bernardino and San Jacinto mountains. Breeds in small colonies on cliffs behind or adjacent to waterfalls in deep canyons and sea-bluffs above the surf; forages widely. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Empidonax traillii extimus southwestern willow flycatcher Birds Endangered Endangered NABCI_RWL- Red Watch List Riparian woodland Riparian woodlands in Southern California. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Emys marmorata western pond turtle Reptiles None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_VU- Vulnerable | USFS_S- Sensitive Aquatic | Artificial flowing waters | Klamath/North coast flowing waters | Klamath/North coast standing waters | Marsh & swamp | Sacramento/S an Joaquin flowing waters | Sacramento/S an Joaquin standing waters | South coast flowing waters | South coast standing waters | Wetland A thoroughly aquatic turtle of ponds, marshes, rivers, streams and irrigation ditches, usually with aquatic vegetation, below 6000 ft elevation. Needs basking sites and suitable (sandy banks or grassy open fields) upland habitat up to 0.5 km from water for egg- laying. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Eumops perotis californicus western mastiff bat Mammals None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | WBWG_H- High Priority Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Valley & foothill grassland Many open, semi-arid to arid habitats, including conifer and deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands, chaparral, etc. Roosts in crevices in cliff faces, high buildings, trees and tunnels. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Falco peregrinus anatum American peregrine falcon Birds Delisted Delisted CDF_S- Sensitive | CDFW_FP-Fully Protected Near wetlands, lakes, rivers, or other water; on cliffs, banks, dunes, mounds; also, human-made structures. Nest consists of a scrape or a depression or ledge in an open site. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Gila orcuttii arroyo chub Fish None None AFS_VU- Vulnerable | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | USFS_S- Sensitive Aquatic | South coast flowing waters Native to streams from Malibu Creek to San Luis Rey River basin. Introduced into streams in Santa Clara, Ventura, Santa Ynez, Mojave and San Diego river basins. Slow water stream sections with mud or sand bottoms. Feeds heavily on aquatic vegetation and associated invertebrates. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Glyptostoma gabrielense San Gabriel chestnut Mollusks None None Terrestrial. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Gonidea angulata western ridged mussel Mollusks None None Aquatic Primarily creeks and rivers and less often lakes. Originally in most of state, now extirpated from Central and Southern California. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Icteria virens yellow- breasted chat Birds None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern Riparian forest | Riparian scrub | Riparian woodland Summer resident; inhabits riparian thickets of willow and other brushy tangles near watercourses. Nests in low, dense riparian, consisting of willow, blackberry, wild grape; forages and nests within 10 ft of ground. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Lasionycteris noctivagans silver-haired bat Mammals None None IUCN_LC-Least Concern | WBWG_M- Medium Priority Lower montane coniferous forest | Oldgrowth | Riparian forest Primarily a coastal and montane forest dweller, feeding over streams, ponds and open brushy areas. Roosts in hollow trees, beneath exfoliating bark, abandoned woodpecker holes, and rarely under rocks. Needs drinking water. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Lasiurus blossevillii western red bat Mammals None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | WBWG_H- High Priority Cismontane woodland | Lower montane coniferous forest | Riparian forest | Riparian woodland Roosts primarily in trees, 2-40 ft above ground, from sea level up through mixed conifer forests. Prefers habitat edges and mosaics with trees that are protected from above and open below with open areas for foraging. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Lasiurus cinereus hoary bat Mammals None None IUCN_LC-Least Concern | WBWG_M- Medium Priority Broadleaved upland forest | Cismontane woodland | Lower montane coniferous forest | North coast coniferous forest Prefers open habitats or habitat mosaics, with access to trees for cover and open areas or habitat edges for feeding. Roosts in dense foliage of medium to large trees. Feeds primarily on moths. Requires water. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Lasiurus xanthinus western yellow bat Mammals None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | WBWG_H- High Priority Desert wash Found in valley foothill riparian, desert riparian, desert wash, and palm oasis habitats. Roosts in trees, particularly palms. Forages over water and among trees. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Lepus californicus bennettii San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit Mammals None None Coastal scrub Intermediate canopy stages of shrub habitats and open shrub / herbaceous and tree / herbaceous edges. Coastal sage scrub habitats in Southern California. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Nyctinomops femorosaccus pocketed free- tailed bat Mammals None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | WBWG_M- Medium Priority Joshua tree woodland | Pinon & juniper woodlands | Riparian scrub | Sonoran desert scrub Variety of arid areas in Southern California; pine- juniper woodlands, desert scrub, palm oasis, desert wash, desert riparian, etc. Rocky areas with high cliffs. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Nyctinomops macrotis big free-tailed bat Mammals None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | WBWG_MH- Medium-High Priority Low-lying arid areas in Southern California. Need high cliffs or rocky outcrops for roosting sites. Feeds principally on large moths. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Onychomys torridus ramona southern grasshopper mouse Mammals None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern Chenopod scrub Desert areas, especially scrub habitats with friable soils for digging. Prefers low to moderate shrub cover. Feeds almost exclusively on arthropods, especially scorpions and orthopteran insects. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Ovis canadensis nelsoni desert bighorn sheep Mammals None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_FP-Fully Protected | USFS_S- Sensitive Alpine | Alpine dwarf scrub | Chaparral | Chenopod scrub | Great Basin scrub | Mojavean desert scrub | Montane dwarf scrub | Pinon & juniper woodlands | Riparian woodland | Sonoran desert scrub Widely distributed from the White Mtns in Mono Co. to the Chocolate Mts in Imperial Co. Open, rocky, steep areas with available water and herbaceous forage. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Palaeoxenus dohrni Dohrn's elegant eucnemid beetle Insects None None No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Phrynosoma blainvillii coast horned lizard Reptiles None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal bluff scrub | Coastal scrub | Desert wash | Pinon & juniper woodlands | Riparian scrub | Riparian woodland | Valley & foothill grassland Frequents a wide variety of habitats, most common in lowlands along sandy washes with scattered low bushes. Open areas for sunning, bushes for cover, patches of loose soil for burial, and abundant supply of ants and other insects. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Polioptila californica californica coastal California gnatcatcher Birds Threatened None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | NABCI_YWL- Yellow Watch List Coastal bluff scrub | Coastal scrub Obligate, permanent resident of coastal sage scrub below 2500 ft in Southern California. Low, coastal sage scrub in arid washes, on mesas and slopes. Not all areas classified as coastal sage scrub are occupied. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Rana boylii foothill yellow- legged frog Amphibians None Endangered BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_NT-Near Threatened | USFS_S- Sensitive Aquatic | Chaparral | Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Klamath/North coast flowing waters | Lower montane coniferous forest | Meadow & seep | Riparian forest | Riparian woodland | Sacramento/S an Joaquin flowing waters Partly-shaded, shallow streams and riffles with a rocky substrate in a variety of habitats. Needs at least some cobble- sized substrate for egg-laying. Needs at least 15 weeks to attain metamorphosi s. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Rana muscosa southern mountain yellow-legged frog Amphibians Endangered Endangered CDFW_WL- Watch List | IUCN_EN- Endangered | USFS_S- Sensitive Aquatic Disjunct populations known from southern Sierras (northern DPS) and San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mtns (southern DPS). Found at 1,000 to 12,000 ft in lakes and creeks that stem from springs and snowmelt. May overwinter under frozen lakes. Often encountered within a few feet of water. Tadpoles may require 2 - 4 yrs to complete their aquatic development. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Rhinichthys osculus ssp. 8 Santa Ana speckled dace Fish None None AFS_TH- Threatened | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | USFS_S- Sensitive Aquatic | South coast flowing waters Headwaters of the Santa Ana and San Gabriel rivers. May be extirpated from the Los Angeles River system. Requires permanent flowing streams with summer water temps of 17- 20 C. Usually inhabits shallow cobble and gravel riffles. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Riparia riparia bank swallow Birds None Threatened BLM_S- Sensitive | IUCN_LC-Least Concern Riparian scrub | Riparian woodland Colonial nester; nests primarily in riparian and other lowland habitats west of the desert. Requires vertical banks/cliffs with fine- textured/sand y soils near streams, rivers, lakes, ocean to dig nesting hole. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Spea hammondii western spadefoot Amphibians None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_NT-Near Threatened Cismontane woodland | Coastal scrub | Valley & foothill grassland | Vernal pool | Wetland Occurs primarily in grassland habitats, but can be found in valley- foothill hardwood woodlands. Vernal pools are essential for breeding and egg-laying. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Taricha torosa Coast Range newt Amphibians None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern Coastal drainages from Mendocino County to San Diego County. Lives in terrestrial habitats and will migrate over 1 km to breed in ponds, reservoirs and slow moving streams. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Taxidea taxus American badger Mammals None None CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern Alkali marsh | Alkali playa | Alpine | Alpine dwarf scrub | Bog & fen | Brackish marsh | Broadleaved upland forest | Chaparral | Chenopod scrub | Cismontane woodland | Closed-cone coniferous forest | Coastal bluff scrub | Coastal dunes | Coastal prairie | Coastal scrub | Desert dunes | Desert wash | Freshwater marsh | Great Basin grassland | Great Basin Most abundant in drier open stages of most shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats, with friable soils. Needs sufficient food, friable soils and open, uncultivated ground. Preys on burrowing rodents. Digs burrows. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/ Absence Thamnophis hammondii two-striped gartersnake Reptiles None None BLM_S- Sensitive | CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Concern | IUCN_LC-Least Concern | USFS_S- Sensitive Marsh & swamp | Riparian scrub | Riparian woodland | Wetland Coastal California from vicinity of Salinas to northwest Baja California. From sea to about 7,000 ft elevation. Highly aquatic, found in or near permanent fresh water. Often along streams with rocky beds and riparian growth. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. Vireo bellii pusillus least Bell's vireo Birds Endangered Endangered IUCN_NT-Near Threatened | NABCI_YWL- Yellow Watch List Riparian forest | Riparian scrub | Riparian woodland Summer resident of Southern California in low riparian in vicinity of water or in dry river bottoms; below 2000 ft. Nests placed along margins of bushes or on twigs projecting into pathways, usually willow, Baccharis, mesquite. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present. APPENDIX C Ruderal habitat on the project site. Disturbed areas of rocks and pavement. Facing north. Ruderal habitat on the project site. Appears to be previously disturbed. Sparse vegetation present. Ruderal habitat on the project site. Single- family residence adjacent but offsite. Facing northwest. Ruderal habitat on the project site. Facing west. Power lines offsite. Ruderal habitat on the project site. Facing south. Mission Drive exists south of the site. Ruderal habitat on the project site. Appears to be previously disturbed. Sparse vegetation present. Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta) in the distance. APPENDIX D Soil Map—Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part (Property Line) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/27/2022 Page 1 of 3377238037724103772440377247037725003772530377256037725903772620377238037724103772440377247037725003772530377256037725903772620400150400180400210400240400270400300400330 400150 400180 400210 400240 400270 400300 400330 34° 5' 22'' N 118° 4' 56'' W34° 5' 22'' N118° 4' 48'' W34° 5' 14'' N 118° 4' 56'' W34° 5' 14'' N 118° 4' 48'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 15 30 60 90 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,260 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part Survey Area Data: Version 8, Sep 13, 2021 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Dec 5, 2020—Feb 6, 2021 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part (Property Line) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/27/2022 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 1002 Urban land-Palmview-Tujunga complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes 3.4 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 3.4 100.0% Soil Map—Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part Property Line Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/27/2022 Page 3 of 3 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE 8601 MISSION DRIVE PROJECT CITY OF ROSEMEAD, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APNs 5389-009-29, -30, and -31 Lead Agency: City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Preparer: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 ___________________ Signature Project Proponent: Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025 May 13, 2022 Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i Archaeological Database Information Authors: Brian F. Smith, M.A. and Elena C. Goralogia, B.A. Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 679-8218 Client/Project Proponent: City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Report Date: May 13, 2022 Report Title: Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project, City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California (APNs 5389- 009-29, -30, and -31) Type of Study: Phase I Cultural Resources Study USGS Quadrangle: Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 11 West of the El Monte, California (7.5-minute) Acreage: 3.38 acres Key Words: Archaeological study; P-19-190503 relocated; no impacts to recorded cultural resources; monitoring recommended. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii Table of Contents Section Description Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT ........................................................................ iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1.0–1 1.1 Project Description............................................................................................1.0–1 1.2 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................1.0–1 1.3 Cultural Setting .................................................................................................1.0–1 1.3.1 Prehistoric Period ....................................................................................1.0–1 1.3.2 Ethnohistoric Period ................................................................................1.0–9 1.4 Results of the Archaeological Records Search .................................................1.0–12 1.5 Applicable Regulations .....................................................................................1.0–14 1.5.1 California Environmental Quality Act .....................................................1.0–14 2.0 RESEARCH DESIGN .............................................................................................2.0–1 3.0 FIELD SURVEY .....................................................................................................3.0–1 3.1 Survey Methods ................................................................................................3.0–1 3.2 Results ...............................................................................................................3.0–1 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................................4.0–1 4.1 Construction Monitoring Program ....................................................................4.0–1 5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED .......................5.0–1 6.0 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................6.0–1 List of Appendices Appendix A – Resumes of Key Personnel Appendix B – Archaeological Records Search Results* Appendix C – NAHC Sacred Lands File Search Results* *Deleted for public review and bound separately in the Confidential Appendix Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii List of Figures Figure Description Page Figure 1.1–1 General Location Map ...................................................................................1.0–2 Figure 1.1–2 Project Location Map (USGS) ......................................................................1.0–3 Figure 1.1–3 Conceptual Site Plan......................................................................................1.0–4 List of Plates Plate Description Page Plate 3.2–1 Overview of the project, facing northwest ...................................................3.0–2 Plate 3.2–2 View of the driveway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter- Day Saints building, facing east ...................................................................3.0–2 Plate 3.2–3 Overview of the project, facing southeast ....................................................3.0–3 Plate 3.2–4 Overview of the project, facing west ...........................................................3.0–3 Plate 3.2–5 View of the driveway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter- Day Saints building, facing west .................................................................3.0–4 Plate 3.2–6 View of a driveway/walkway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints building, facing south .....................................................3.0–4 List of Tables Table Description Page Table 1.4–1 Cultural Resources Located Within One-Half Mile of the 8601 Mission Drive Project ................................................................................................1.0–12 Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT In response to a request from the project applicant, a cultural resources study was conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (BFSA) for the proposed 8601 Mission Drive Project located northeast of the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive in the city of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The 3.38-acre project includes Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 5389-009-29, -30, and -31 and is situated within Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 11 West, in the USGS El Monte Quadrangle. The project proposes the development of 37 single-family dwelling units with associated parking, landscaping, and infrastructure. The purpose of this investigation was to locate and record any cultural resources present within the project and subsequently evaluate any resources as part of the City of Rosemead environmental review process conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An archaeological records search was conducted from the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton (CSU Fullerton) in order to assess previous archaeological studies and identify any previously recorded archaeological sites within the project or in the immediate vicinity. The records search identified 21 resources located within a one-half-mile radius of the current project, one of which (P-19-190503, the Southern California Edison [SCE] Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Transmission Line) is located within the subject property. The records search also identified 13 cultural resource reports conducted within one-half mile of the current project, none of which include the subject property. In addition, a Sacred Lands Files (SLF) search was requested from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to determine if any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance are present within the project. The cultural resources survey was conducted on February 18, 2022. The transmission line recorded as P-19-190503 is still present running above the property; however, none of the steel lattice towers, steel poles, or wood poles are within the subject property. The property has been previously graded and disturbed by the development of the parcel for a church facility. No additional cultural resources were identified during the survey; however, due to the previous disturbance of the property and the current coverage of the ground surface by grasses and weeds, the potential exists that unidentified significant historic deposits may be present. Because of this potential to encounter buried cultural deposits, monitoring of grading by qualified archaeologists is recommended. As part of this study, a copy of this report will be submitted to the SCCIC at CSU Fullerton. All notes, photographs, and other materials related to this project will be curated at the archaeological laboratory of BFSA in Poway, California. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description The archaeological study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project was conducted in order to comply with CEQA and City of Rosemead environmental guidelines. The project is located within the San Gabriel Valley in the northwestern portion of the city of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California (Figure 1.1–1). The 3.38-acre project, which includes APNs 5389-009-29, - 30, and -31, is located northeast of the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive. The project is situated within Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 11 West, in the USGS El Monte Quadrangle (Figure 1.1–2). The project proposes the development of 37 single-family dwelling units with associated parking, landscaping, and infrastructure (Figure 1.1–3). The decision to request this investigation was based upon cultural resource sensitivity of the locality as suggested by known site density and predictive modeling. Sensitivity for cultural resources in a given area is usually indicated by known settlement patterns, which in the San Gabriel Valley of Los Angeles County were focused around freshwater resources and a food supply. 1.2 Environmental Setting The 8601 Mission Drive Project is generally situated in the Peninsular Ranges Geologic Province of southern California. The range, which lies in a northwest to southeast trend through the county, extends approximately 1,000 miles from the Raymond-Malibu Fault Zone in western Los Angeles County to the southern tip of Baja California. The project is located in the San Gabriel Valley Basin of the larger Los Angeles Basin, a large structural sedimentary basin bounded and cut through by several active fault systems in the Los Angeles metropolitan area (Hillhouse et al. 2002). The concrete-lined Rubio Wash, a tributary to the Rio Hondo, flows southward approximately one-quarter mile east of the project (Wirths 2022). As mapped by Tan (1998), the project is underlain by unconsolidated Holocene sandy and gravelly young alluvial fan and valley deposits. The property is surrounded by residential development. 1.3 Cultural Setting 1.3.1 Prehistoric Period Several prehistoric cultural chronologies have been proposed for the southern California coast and nearby inland areas, such as two of the most frequently cited sequences developed by William Wallace (1955) and Claude Warren (1968). Such chronologies provide a framework to discuss archaeological data in relation to broad cultural changes seen in the archaeological record. The chronological sequence presented herein represents an updated synthesis of these schemes for Los Angeles County and surrounding regions. The prehistoric sequence of the area can be divided into four broad temporal categories. It should be noted that the prehistoric chronology for the region is being refined on a continuing basis, with new discoveries and improvments being made in the accuracy of dating techniques. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–5 Terminal Pleistocene and Early Holocene: Paleo-Coastal Period (circa 9500 to 7000/6500 B.C.) Although data on early human occupation for the southern California coast is limited, archaeological evidence from the northern Channel Islands suggests initial settlement within the region occurred at least 12,000 years before the present (YBP). At Daisy Cave (SMI-261) on San Miguel Island, radiocarbon dates indicate an early period of use in the terminal Pleistocene, sometime between 9600 and 9000 calibrated (cal) B.C. (Erlandson et al. 1996). Nearby on Santa Rosa Island, human remains from the Arlington Springs Site (SRI-1730) have been dated between 11,000 and 10,000 cal B.C. (Johnson et al. 2002). Archaeological data recovered from these and other coastal Paleo Indian sites indicate a distinctively maritime cultural adaptation, termed the “Paleo-Coastal Tradition” (Moratto 1984), which involved the use of seafaring technology and a subsistence regime focused upon shellfish gathering and fishing (Rick et al. 2001). Relatively few sites have been identified in Los Angeles County that date to the terminal Pleistocene and early Holocene. Evidence of possible early human occupation has been found at the sand dune bluff site of Malaga Cove (LAN-138), located between Redondo Beach and Palos Verdes (Walker 1951). Researchers have proposed that archaeological remains recovered from the lowermost cultural stratum at the site, including shell, animal bone, and chipped stone tools, may date to as early as 8000 cal B.C. (Moratto 1984:168; Wallace 1986). Middle Holocene: Milling Stone Period (circa 7000/6500 to 1500/1000 B.C.) The Milling Stone Period or Horizon, also referred to as the “Encinitas Tradition,” is the earliest well-established cultural occupation of the coastal areas of the region (Sutton 2010; Sutton and Gardner 2010). The onset of this period, which began sometime between 7000 and 6500 cal B.C., is marked by the expansion of populations throughout southern California. Regional variations in technology, settlement patterns, and mortuary practices among Milling Stone sites have led researchers to define several local manifestations or “patterns” of the tradition (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Groups that occupied modern-day Los Angeles County are thought to have been relatively small and highly mobile during this time, with a general subsistence economy focused upon the gathering of shellfish and plant foods, particularly hard seeds, with hunting being of less importance (Glassow et al. 2007). Two temporal subdivisions have been defined for the portion of the Topanga Pattern falling within the Milling Stone Period: Topanga I (circa 6500 to 3000 B.C.) and Topanga II (circa 3000 to 1000 B.C.) (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Topanga I assemblages are characterized by abundant manos and metates, core tools and scrapers, charmstones, cogged stone, and discoidals. Projectile points are quite rare, with those present resembling earlier, large, leaf- shaped forms (Glassow et al. 2007). Secondary inhumations with associated cairns are the most common burial form at Milling Stone sites, with small numbers of identified extended inhumations. The subsequent Topanga II phase largely represents a continuation of the Topanga pattern with site assemblages characterized by numerous manos and metates, charmstones, Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–6 cogged stones, discoidals, and some stone balls. A significant technological change in ground stone occurs at this time, with the appearance of mortars and pestles at Topanga II sites suggesting the adoption of balanophagy by coastal populations (Sutton and Gardner 2010). The quantity of projectile points also notably increases in Topanga II site deposits, indicating that the hunting of large game may have played a greater role in the subsistence economy than in earlier times. While secondary burials continue to be quite common, a few flexed inhumations have also been recovered from archaeological contexts dating to the Topanga II phase. A number of Milling Stone sites have been identified in Los Angeles County. The lower component of the Tank Site (LAN-1), located in the Santa Monica Mountains, was excavated in the 1940s and was determined to be Topanga I in age. In the San Fernando Valley, the Encino Site (LAN-111) is thought to have contained a Topanga I component. The artifact assemblage is definitive of the Topanga I period, containing many milling implements, but few projectile points. The presence of mortars and pestles along with stemmed projectile points at the Chatsworth Site (LAN-21), located at the western edge of the San Fernando Valley, suggests a Topanga II presence. The Big Tujunga Wash Site (LAN-167), located at the eastern edge of the San Fernando Valley, may have also contained a Topanga II component (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Late Holocene: Intermediate Period (1500/1000 B.C. to A.D. 750) The Intermediate Period, which encompasses the early portion of the “Del Rey Tradition,” as defined by Sutton (Sutton 2010), begins around 3,500 YBP. At this time, significant changes are seen throughout the coastal areas of southern California in material culture, settlement systems, subsistence strategies, and mortuary practices. These new cultural traits have been attributed to the arrival of Takic-speaking people from the southern San Joaquin Valley (Sutton 2009). Biological, archaeological, and linguistic data indicates that the Takic groups who settled in the Los Angeles Basin were ethnically distinct from the preexisting Hokan-speaking Topanga populations, and are believed to be ancestral to ethnographic Gabrielino groups (Sutton 2009). While archaeological evidence indicates that “relic” Topanga III populations continued to survive in isolation in the Santa Monica Mountains, these indigenous groups appear to have been largely replaced or absorbed by the Gabrielino, or Chumash, by 2,000 YBP (Sutton and Gardner 2010:17). Intermediate Period sites in the region are represented by the “Angeles Pattern” of the Del Rey Tradition (Sutton 2010). Three temporal subdivisions have been defined for the portion of the Angeles Pattern that falls within the Intermediate Period: Angeles I (1500 to 600 B.C.), Angeles II (600 B.C. to A.D. 400), and Angeles III (A.D. 400 to 750) (Sutton and Gardner 2010:8). The onset of the Angeles I phase is characterized by the increase and aggregation of regional populations and the appearance of the first village settlements. The prevalence of projectile points, single-piece shell fishhooks, and bone harpoon points at Angeles I sites suggests a subsistence shift in the Intermediate Period, an increased emphasis on fishing and Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–7 terrestrial hunting, and less reliance upon the gathering of shellfish resources. Regional trade or interaction networks also appeared to develop at this time, with coastal populations in Los Angeles County obtaining small steatite artifacts and Olivella sp. shell beads from the southern Channel Islands and obsidian from the Coso Volcanic Field (Koerper et al. 2002). Finally, marked changes are seen in mortuary practices during the Angeles I phase with flexed primary inhumations and cremations replacing extended inhumations and cairns. The Angeles II phase largely represents a continuation and elaboration of the Angeles I technology, settlement, and subsistence systems. One exception to this pattern is the introduction of a new funerary complex around 2,600 YBP, consisting of large rock cairns or platforms, which contain abundant broken tools, faunal remains, and cremated human bone. These mortuary features have generally been thought to represent the predecessor of the Southern California Mourning Ceremony (Sutton 2010:14). Several important changes in the archaeological record mark the beginning of the Angeles III phase. At this time, larger seasonal villages characterized by well-developed middens and cemeteries were established along the coast or the inland areas. Archaeological data from Angeles III sites indicates that residents of these settlements practiced a fairly diverse subsistence strategy, which included the exploitation of both marine and terrestrial resources (Sutton 2010:16). Notable technological changes at this time included the introduction of the plank canoe and the bow and arrow (Glassow et al. 2007:203-204). The appearance of new Olivella sp. bead types at Angeles III sites indicates a reconfiguration of existing regional exchange networks with increased interaction with populations in the Gulf of California (Koerper et al. 2002). Finally, cremations increase slightly in frequency at this time, with inhumations no longer placed in an extended position (Sutton 2010:18). Intermediate Period sites in Los Angeles County include LAN-2 and LAN-197, which are located in the Santa Monica Mountains. The formal cemeteries at these sites are representative of the increased sedentism that occurred during the Intermediate Period (Glassow et al. 2007:202). Late Holocene: Late Period (A.D. 750 to Spanish Contact) The Late Period dates from approximately A.D. 750 until Spanish contact in 1542. Sutton (2010) has divided this period, which falls within the larger Del Rey Tradition, into two phases: Angeles IV (A.D. 750 to 1200) and Angeles V (A.D. 1200 to 1550). The Angeles IV phase is characterized by the continued growth of regional populations and the development of large, sedentary villages. Although chiefdoms appear to have developed in the northern Channel Islands and the Santa Barbara region after 850 YBP (Arnold 1992; Gamble 2005), little direct evidence has been found to suggest that this level of social complexity existed in the Los Angeles area during the Late Prehistoric Period (Sutton 2010). Several new types of material culture appear during the Angeles IV phase, including Cottonwood series points, birdstone and “spike” effigies, Olivella sp. cupped beads, and Mytilus sp. shell disc beads. The presence of southwestern pottery, Patayan ceramic figurines, and Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–8 Hohokam shell bracelets at Angeles IV sites suggests some interaction between groups in southern California and the Southwest. Notable changes are seen in regional exchange networks after 800 YBP, with an increase in the number and size of steatite artifacts, including large vessels, elaborate effigies, and comals (cooking dishes) recovered from Angeles V sites. The presence of these artifacts suggests a strengthening of trade ties between coastal Los Angeles populations and the southern Channel Islands (Koerper et al. 2002:69). Finally, Late Period mortuary practices remain largely unchanged from the Intermediate Period, with flexed primary inhumations continuing to be the preferred burial method. Late Period sites in Los Angeles County include LAN-227 and LAN-229, which are located in the Santa Monica Mountains. Both sites contain fewer manos and metates than earlier sites, but more mortars, pestles, projectile points, drills, beads, pipes, and bone tools (Moratto 1984:141). Although these sites represent a move toward centralized sedentary villages during this period, it is unclear whether they represent year-round occupation or semi-permanent villages used as base settlements (Glassow et al. 2007:210). Late Holocene / Protohistoric Period / The Gabrieliño (1769 to Present) During the late Holocene, population size and density increased dramatically, calling for an even more diversified economy (Altschul and Grenda 2002). Ethnographic data, the first of which came from Spanish explorers and missionaries, indicates that the Gabrieliño (Tongva) were the major tribe established within the San Gabriel Valley. The Spanish attributed this name to the Native Americans in the area served by the Mission San Gabriel Archángel. Gabrieliño territory included the watersheds of the San Gabriel, Santa Ana, and Los Angeles rivers, portions of the Santa Monica and Santa Ana mountains, the Los Angeles Basin, the coast from Aliso Creek to Topanga Creek, and San Clemente, San Nicolas, and Santa Catalina islands (Moratto 1984). The Gabrieliño spoke a Cupan language that was part of the Shoshonean or Takic family of Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock; these linguistic ties united a dispersed ethnic group occupying 1,500 square miles in the Los Angeles Basin region (Altschul and Grenda 2002). Interestingly, this language stock was different from that of the Chumash to the north in the Santa Barbara region, as well as from the Kumeyaay (Tipai and Ipai) in the San Diego region, both of which spoke languages of the Hokan stock, using different dialects. Ethnographic data states that the Gabrieliño were hunters and gatherers whose food sources included acorns, seeds, marine mollusks, fish, and mammals; archaeological sites support this data, with evidence of hunting, gathering, processing, and storage implements including arrow points, fishhooks, scrapers, grinding stones, and basketry awls (Altschul and Grenda 2002). Santa Catalina Island provided a valuable source of steatite for the Gabrieliño, which they quarried and traded to other groups (Heizer and Treganza 1972; Moratto 1984). About 50 to 100 permanent villages are estimated to have been in existence at the time of European contact, most of which were located along lowland rivers and streams, and along sheltered areas of the coast (Moratto 1984). Smaller satellite villages and resource extraction Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–9 sites were located between larger villages. Village sites contained varying types of structures, including houses, sweathouses, and ceremonial huts (Bean and Smith 1978). Artistic items included shell set in asphaltum, carvings, painting, steatite, and baskets (Moratto 1984). Settlements were often located at the intersection of two or more ecozones, thus increasing the variety of resources that were immediately accessible (Moratto 1984). Offshore fishing and hunting was accomplished with the use of plank boats, while shellfish and birds were collected along the coast. At the time of European contact, the Gabrieliño, second only to the Chumash, were the wealthiest, most populous, and most powerful ethnic group in southern California (Bean and Smith 1978; Moratto 1984). As with other Native American populations in southern California, the arrival of the Spanish drastically changed life for the Gabrieliño. Incorporation into the mission system disrupted their culture and changed their subsistence practices (Altschul and Grenda 2002). Ranchos were established throughout the area, often in major drainages where Native American villages tended to be located. By the early 1800s, Mission San Gabriel had expanded its holdings for grazing to include much of the former Gabrieliño territory (Altschul and Grenda 2002). Eventually, widespread relocation of Native American groups occurred, resulting in further disruption of the native lifeways. Together with the introduction of Euro-American diseases, the Gabrieliño and other groups of southern California experienced drastic population declines; in the early 1860s, a smallpox epidemic nearly wiped out the remaining Gabrieliño population (Moratto 1984). While people of Gabrieliño descent still live in the Los Angeles area, the Gabrieliño were no longer listed as a culturally identifiable group in the 1900 Federal Census (Bean and Smith 1978; Moratto 1984). 1.3.2 Ethnohistoric Period Traditionally, the history of the state of California has been divided into three general periods: the Spanish Period (1769 to 1821), the Mexican Period (1822 to 1846), and the American Period (1848 to present) (Caughey 1970). The American Period is often further subdivided into additional phases: the nineteenth century (1848 to 1900), the early twentieth century (1900 to 1950), and the Modern Period (1950 to present). From an archaeological standpoint, all of these phases can be referred to together as the Ethnohistoric Period. This provides a valuable tool for archaeologists, as ethnohistory is directly concerned with the study of indigenous or non-Western peoples from a combined historical/anthropological viewpoint, which employs written documents, oral narrative, material culture, and ethnographic data for analysis. European exploration along the California coast began in 1542 with the landing of Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo and his men at San Diego Bay. Sixty years after the Cabrillo expeditions, an expedition under Sebastian Viscaíno made an extensive and thorough exploration of the Pacific coast. Although the voyage did not extend beyond the northern limits of the Cabrillo track, Viscaíno had the most lasting effect upon the nomenclature of the coast. Many of his place Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–10 names have survived, whereas practically every one of the names created by Cabrillo have faded from use. For instance, Cabrillo named the first (now) United States port he stopped at “San Miguel”; 60 years later, Viscaíno changed it to “San Diego” (Rolle 1969). The historic background of the project area began with the Spanish colonization of Alta California. The first Spanish colonizing expedition reached southern California in 1769 with the intention of converting and civilizing the indigenous populations, as well as expanding the knowledge of and access to new resources in the region (Brigandi 1998). As a result, by the late eighteenth century, a large portion of southern California was overseen by Mission San Luis Rey (San Diego County), Mission San Juan Capistrano (Orange County), and Mission San Gabriel (Los Angeles County), who began colonizing the region and surrounding areas (Chapman 1921). Each mission gained power through the support of a large, subjugated Native American workforce. As the missions grew, livestock holdings increased and became more vulnerable to theft. In order to protect their interests, the southern California missions began to expand inland to try and provide additional security (Beattie and Beattie 1939; Caughey 1970). In order to meet their needs, the Spaniards embarked upon a formal expedition in 1806 to find potential locations within what is now the San Bernardino Valley. As a result, by 1810, Father Francisco Dumetz of Mission San Gabriel had succeeded in establishing a religious site, or capilla, at a Cahuilla rancheria called Guachama (Beattie and Beattie 1939). San Bernardino Valley received its name from this site, which was dedicated to San Bernardino de Siena by Father Dumetz. The Guachama rancheria was located in present-day Bryn Mawr in San Bernardino County. The indigenous groups who occupied these lands were recruited by missionaries, converted, and put to work in the missions (Pourade 1961). Throughout this period, the Native American populations were decimated by introduced diseases, a drastic shift in diet resulting in poor nutrition, and social conflicts due to the introduction of an entirely new social order (Cook 1976). On September 8, 1771, Father Pedro Cambón and Father Angel Somera established Mission San Gabriel de Arcángel near the present-day city of Montebello. In 1775, the mission was moved to its current location in San Gabriel due to better agricultural lands. This mission was the first sustained European occupation of the Los Angeles County area. The San Gabriel mission, despite a slow start that was partially due to misconduct by Spanish soldiers, eventually became so prosperous that it was known as “The Queen of the Missions” (Johnson et al. 1972). The pueblo of Los Angeles was established in 1781. During this period, Spain also deeded ranchos to prominent citizens and soldiers (though very few in comparison to the later Mexican Period). One such rancho, Rancho San Pedro, was deeded to soldier Juan Jose Dominguez in 1784 and comprised 75,000 acres, encompassing the modern South Bay region from the Los Angeles River on the east to the Pacific Ocean on the west. Mission San Fernando Rey de España was established in 1797 by Fray Fermin de Lasuén, who brought three families from a different mission. Upon their arrival, Spain granted the land now known as San Fernando Valley to the mission. After construction of the mission, traffic through the valley increased via the “Indian trail,” which led from Mission San Fernando Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–11 to Mission Santa Buenaventura and was part of the El Camino del Santa Susana y Simi trail that stretched over Santa de Susana Pass (Watson 1991). The area that became Los Angeles County saw an increase in European settlement during the Mexican Period, largely due to the many land grants (ranchos) given to Mexican citizens by various governors. The period ended when Mexican forces fought the combined United States Army and Navy forces in the Battle of the San Gabriel River on January 8, 1847, and the Battle of La Mesa on January 9, 1847 (Nevin 1978). On January 10, 1847, leaders of the pueblo of Los Angeles peacefully surrendered after Mexican General Jose Maria Flores withdrew his forces. Shortly thereafter, Andrés Pico, the newly appointed Mexican Military Commander of California, surrendered all of Alta California to United States Army Lieutenant Colonel John C. Fremont in the Treaty of Cahuenga (Nevin 1978). Settlement of the Los Angeles region accelerated during the early American Period. Los Angeles County was established on February 18, 1850. It was one of 27 counties established in the months prior to California becoming a state. Many ranchos in the county were sold or otherwise acquired by Americans, and most were subdivided into agricultural parcels or towns. Ranching retained its importance, and by the late 1860s, Los Angeles was one of the top dairy production centers in the country (Rolle 1969). In 1854, the United States Congress agreed to let San Pedro become an official port of entry, and by the 1880s, the railroads had established networks throughout the county. This resulted in fast and affordable shipment of goods and a means to transport new residents to the booming region (Dumke 1944). New residents included many health-seekers that were drawn to the area during the 1870s and the 1880s due to the fabled climate (Baur 1959). In 1876, the county had a population of 30,000 (Dumke 1944:7); by 1900, it had reached 100,000. In the early to mid-1900s, population growth accelerated due to industry associated with both world wars and emigration from the Midwest “dust bowl” states during the Great Depression. Los Angeles County became one of the most densely occupied areas in the United States. The county’s mild climate and successful economy continued to draw new residents in the late 1900s, and as a result, much of the county transformed from ranches and farms into residential subdivisions surrounding commercial and industrial centers. Hollywood’s development into the entertainment capital of the world and southern California’s booming aerospace industry were key factors in the county’s growth. Project Area and Vicinity The city of Rosemead was formed in an area that “was part of the San Gabriel Mission during the Spanish colonial period until the early 1850s” (City of Rosemead 2010). In 1852, John and Harriet Guest settled on “the [100-acre] Savannah Ranch, which is located on the current Savannah School site” in Rosemead (City of Rosemead 2010, 2017). “Leonard J. and Amanda Rose were other early settlers, who established Rose’s Meadows (Rosemead Ranch) as a winery, as well as a breeding and training area for horses” (City of Rosemead 2010). Rose’s Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–12 Meadow eventually gave the city of Rosemead its name (City of Rosemead 2017). Rosemead was historically “known for small farms, as well as chicken and rabbit ranches. The City was incorporated in 1959 with a population of 15,476. Forty-seven years after incorporation, the City of Rosemead had an estimated population of 57,144” (City of Rosemead 2010). 1.4 Results of the Archaeological Records Search An archaeological records search for the project and the surrounding area within a one- half-mile radius was conducted at the SCCIC at CSU Fullerton. The records search indicates that 21 cultural resources are located within a one-half-mile radius of the project, one of which (P-19-190503, the SCE Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Transmission Line) is located within the subject property. The remaining 20 cultural resources are all historic and include a railroad, single-family residences, a public utility building, industrial and commercial buildings, engineering structures, and a religious building. Table 1.4–1 Cultural Resources Located Within One-Half Mile of the 8601 Mission Drive Project Site(s) Description P-19-186112 Historic railroad P-19-187027, P-19-187030, P-19-188612, P-19-188614, P-19-188615, P-19-188616, P-19-188617, P-19-188618, and P-19-188619 Historic single-family residence P-19-188607 Historic public utility building P-19-188608 and P-19-188610 Historic warehouse P-19-188611 and P-19-188609 Historic commercial/ industrial building(s) P-19-188702 Historic Eagle Rock-Mesa 220kV Transmission Line P-19-188703 Historic Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Subtransmission Line P-19-188704 Historic Mesa-Vincent 220kV and Goodrich-Laguna Bell 220 kV Transmission Lines P-19-188705 Historic Mesa-Rosemead No.2 Subtransmission Line and Segovia 16 kV Local Distribution Line P-19-190503 SCE Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Transmission Line P-19-190256 Historic church Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–13 The records search also indicates that 13 cultural resource studies have been conducted within a one-half-mile radius of the project (Appendix B), none of which include the current project. The following historic sources were also reviewed: • The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Index • The Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility • The OHP, Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD) • Bureau of Land Management (BLM) General Land Office (GLO) records • The USGS 1968 edition of the 1966 7.5' El Monte topographic quadrangle • Historic aerial photographs dating between 1948 and 2018 According to aerial photographs, a large structure was constructed on the property between 1953 and 1964 but was demolished by 1992. The 1968 edition of the 1966 7.5' El Monte topographic quadrangle shows the structure on the property as being a church. A “new church at 8601 Mission Drive, Rosemead” was listed in the Los Angeles Times in 1955 for “members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints” (Los Angeles Times 1965). The structure is not listed in SCCIC, BERD, NRHP, or California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) files. BFSA also requested a NAHC SLF to determine if any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance are present within the project. The NAHC results were positive for the presence of sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance within the search radius. The NAHC recommended contacting the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. As the lead agency, the City of Rosemead is responsible for Native American consultation per the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52 (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014). AB 52 established a formal consultation process for California tribes as part of the CEQA process. Tribal consultation is not required as part of the Phase I study and is best served by a government-to-government model. As a result, no additional outreach was conducted by BFSA for the current project nor is it required. However, the NAHC included the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation on an email regarding the positive results of the SLF search. All correspondence can be found in Appendix C. The records search and literature review suggest that there is a low potential for prehistoric sites to be contained within the boundaries of the property due to the extensive nature of past ground disturbances and the lack of natural resources often associated with prehistoric sites. No prehistoric sites have been recorded within one-half mile of the project. The records search and literature review suggest that historic buildings and sites associated with the agricultural history of the region are the most likely cultural resources to be encountered within the project. Based upon the previously recorded surrounding resources and the historic aerial photographs, there is a potential for historic resources to be located within the subject property. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–14 1.5 Applicable Regulations Resource importance is assigned to districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess exceptional value or quality illustrating or interpreting the heritage of Los Angeles County in history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture. A number of criteria are used in demonstrating resource importance. Specifically, the criteria outlined in CEQA provides the guidance for making such a determination. The following sections detail the criteria that a resource must meet in order to be determined important. 1.5.1 California Environmental Quality Act According to CEQA (§15064.5a), the term “historical resource” includes the following: 1) A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing in the CRHR (Public Resources Code [PRC] SS5024.1, Title 14 CCR. Section 4850 et seq.). 2) A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant. 3) Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript, which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the CRHR (PRC SS5024.1, Title 14, Section 4852) including the following: a) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; b) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; c) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or d) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. 4) The fact that a resource is not listed on, or determined eligible for listing on, the Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–15 CRHR, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to Section 5020.1[k] of the PRC), or identified in an historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in Section 5024.1[g] of the PRC) does not preclude a lead agency from determining that the resource may be an historical resource as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(j) or 5024.1. According to CEQA (§15064.5b), a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA defines a substantial adverse change as: 1) Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource means physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired. 2) The significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project: a) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion on, or eligibility for inclusion on, the CRHR; or b) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or, c) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the CRHR as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA. Section 15064.5(c) of CEQA applies to effects on archaeological sites and contains the following additional provisions regarding archaeological sites: 1. When a project will impact an archaeological site, a lead agency shall first determine whether the site is an historical resource, as defined in subsection (a). 2. If a lead agency determines that the archaeological site is an historical resource, it shall refer to the provisions of Section 21084.1 of the PRC, Section 15126.4 of the guidelines, and the limits contained in Section 21083.2 of the PRC do not apply. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0–16 3. If an archaeological site does not meet the criteria defined in subsection (a), but does meet the definition of a unique archaeological resource in Section 21083.2 of the PRC, the site shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section 21083.2. The time and cost limitations described in PRC Section 21083.2 (c-f) do not apply to surveys and site evaluation activities intended to determine whether the project location contains unique archaeological resources. 4. If an archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological nor historical resource, the effects of the project on those resources shall not be considered a significant effect on the environment. It shall be sufficient that both the resource and the effect on it are noted in the Initial Study or Environmental Impact Report, if one is prepared to address impacts on other resources, but they need not be considered further in the CEQA process. Section 15064.5(d) and (e) contain additional provisions regarding human remains. Regarding Native American human remains, paragraph (d) provides: (d) When an Initial Study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native American human remains within the project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided in PRC SS5097.98. The applicant may develop an agreement for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any items associated with Native American burials with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC. Action implementing such an agreement is exempt from: 1) The general prohibition on disinterring, disturbing, or removing human remains from any location other than a dedicated cemetery (Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5). 2) The requirements of CEQA and the Coastal Act. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 2.0–1 2.0 RESEARCH DESIGN The primary goal of the research design is to attempt to understand the way in which humans have used the land and resources within the project through time, as well as to aid in the determination of resource significance. For the current project, the study area under investigation is southeastern Los Angeles County. The scope of work for the cultural resources study conducted for the 8601 Mission Drive Project included the survey of a 3.38-acre property. Given the area involved and the recorded presence of nearby cultural resources, the research design for this project was focused upon realistic study options. Since the main objective of the investigation was to identify the presence of and potential impacts to cultural resources, the goal is not necessarily to answer wide-reaching theories regarding the development of early southern California, but to investigate the role and importance of identified resources. Nevertheless, the assessment of the significance of a resource must take into consideration a variety of characteristics, as well as the ability of a resource to address regional research topics and issues. Although elementary resource evaluation programs are limited in terms of the amount of information available, several specific research questions were developed that could be used to guide the initial investigations of any observed cultural resources. The following research questions take into account the size and location of the project discussed above. Research Questions: • Can located cultural resources be associated with a specific time period, population, or individual? • Do the types of any located cultural resources allow a site activity/function to be determined from a preliminary investigation? What are the site activities? What is the site function? What resources were exploited? • How do located sites compare to others reported from different surveys conducted in the area? • How do located sites fit existing models of settlement and subsistence for valley environments of the region? Data Needs At the survey level, the principal research objective is a generalized investigation of changing settlement patterns in both the prehistoric and historic periods within the study area. The overall goal is to understand settlement and resource procurement patterns of the project area occupants. Therefore, adequate information on site function, context, and chronology from an archaeological perspective is essential for the investigation. The fieldwork and archival research were undertaken with the following primary research goals in mind: Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 2.0–2 1) To identify cultural resources occurring within the project; 2) To determine, if possible, site type and function, context of the resource(s), and chronological placement of each cultural resource identified; 3) To place each cultural resource identified within a regional perspective; and 4) To provide recommendations for the treatment of each cultural resource identified. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.0–1 3.0 FIELD SURVEY The cultural resources study of the project consisted of an institutional records search and an intensive cultural resource survey of the entire 3.38-acre project. This study was conducted in conformance with City of Rosemead environmental guidelines, Section 21083.2 of the California PRC, and CEQA. Statutory requirements of CEQA (Section 15064.5) were followed for the identification and evaluation of resources. Specific definitions for archaeological resource type(s) used in this report are those established by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO 1995) and the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance. 3.1 Survey Methods The survey methodology employed during the current investigation followed standard archaeological field procedures and was sufficient to accomplish a thorough assessment of the project. Staff archaeologist Allison Reynolds conducted the intensive pedestrian survey on February 18, 2022. The field methodology employed for the project included walking evenly spaced survey transects set approximately five to 10 meters apart while visually inspecting the ground surface. Visibility of the natural ground surface was good throughout the property and was only constrained by small areas of pavement. All potentially sensitive areas where cultural resources might be located were closely inspected. Photographs documenting survey areas and overall survey conditions were taken frequently. 3.2 Results The entire property has been graded and two areas of concrete are present. Vegetation consists of non-native grasses and weeds with palm and other non-native trees scattered across the property (Plates 3.2–1 to 3.2–4). The concrete remnants on the western and southern project boundaries are driveways/walkways to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints church that was present from circa 1955 (Los Angeles Times 1955) to circa 1992 but has since been demolished (see Plates 3.2–2, 3.2–5, and 3.2–6). The transmission line recorded as P-19-190503 is still present running above the property (see Plates 3.2–1 to 3.2–6); however, none of the steel lattice towers, steel poles, or wood poles are within the subject property. The resource was recorded as “Approximately 50 steel lattice towers, tubular steel poles, and wood poles … erected along the [11-mile] span” (Becker and Crane 2010). Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.0–2 Plate 3.2–1: Overview of the project, facing northwest. Plate 3.2–2: View of the driveway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints building, facing east. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.0–3 Plate 3.2–3: Overview of the project, facing southeast. Plate 3.2–4: Overview of the project, facing west. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.0–4 Plate 3.2–5: View of the driveway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints building, facing west. Plate 3.2–6: View of a driveway/walkway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints building, facing south. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.0–5 According to the site record form: The Mesa-Ravendale-Rush Transmission Line does not appear to be eligible under National Register / California Register Criterion A / 4. The 11-mile span of low- voltage electrical transmission lines were not installed or constructed to include any innovative or unique features or materials that would constitute further study, and beyond what is discussed in this [Urabana Preservation & Planning, LLC] report, no information was found during the course of contextual or property-specific research to indicate that the line could yield additional information which could be considered important to local, state, or national history. (Becker and Crane 2010) The survey did not result in the identification of any additional cultural resources. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4.0–1 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The Phase I archaeological assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project was negative for the presence of cultural resources, aside from the power transmission lines that cross above the property. As stated previously, the subject property has been impacted and graded in the past for the development of the church facility circa 1955. Whether or not cultural resources have ever existed on the subject property is unclear. The current status of the property appears to have affected the potential to discover any surface scatters of artifacts or cultural materials that may have been on-site prior to the grading of the property for the church facility. Given that the prior development within the property might mask archaeological deposits, there is a potential that buried archaeological deposits are present within the project boundaries. Therefore, it is recommended that the project be allowed to proceed with the implementation of a cultural resources monitoring program conducted by an archaeologist and Native American representative during grading of the property. The cultural resources monitoring recommended as a condition of approval for this property is presented in Section 4.1. 4.1 Construction Monitoring Program Monitoring during ground-disturbing activities, such as grading or trenching, by a qualified archaeologist is recommended to ensure that if buried features (i.e., human remains, hearths, or cultural deposits) are present, they will be handled in a timely and proper manner. The scope of the monitoring program is provided below: 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide written verification that a certified archaeologist has been retained to implement the monitoring program. This verification shall be presented in a letter from the project archaeologist to the lead agency. 2) The project applicant shall provide Native American monitoring during grading. The Native American monitor shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials. 3) The certified archaeologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the contractors to explain and coordinate the requirements of the monitoring program. 4) During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological monitor(s) and tribal representative shall be on-site, as determined by the consulting archaeologist, to perform periodic inspections of the excavations. The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated. 5) Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4.0–2 field so the monitored grading can proceed. 6) In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operation in the area of discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the lead agency at the time of discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The lead agency must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program to mitigate impacts shall be prepared by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the lead agency before being carried out using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the medical examiner- coroner and lead agency shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant, as identified by the NAHC, shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. 7) Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered and features recorded using professional archaeological methods. The project archaeologist shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis. 8) All cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. 9) A report documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the lead agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include Department of Parks and Recreation Primary and Archaeological Site Forms. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5.0–1 5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED The archaeological survey program for the 8601 Mission Drive Project was directed by Principal Investigator Brian F. Smith. The archaeological fieldwork was conducted by staff archaeologist Allison Reynolds. The report text was prepared by Brian F. Smith and Elena C Goralogia. Report graphics were created by Jillian L.H. Conroy. Technical editing and report production were conducted by Elena C. Goralogia. The archaeological records search was provided by the SCCIC at CSU Fullerton. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6.0–1 6.0 REFERENCES CITED Altschul, Jeffery H. and Donn R. Grenda 2002 Islanders and Mainlanders: Prehistoric Context for the Southern California Bight. SRI Press, Tucson, Arizona. Baur, John E. 1959 The Health Seekers of Southern California. Huntington Library Publications, San Marino, California. Bean, Lowell John and Charles R. Smith 1978 Gabrieliño. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 538–549. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8. William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Beattie, George W. and Helen P. Beattie 1939 Heritage of the Valley: San Bernardino’s First Century. Biobooks, Oakland, California. Becker, Wendy L. Tinsley and Heather Crane 2010 Site record form for P-19-190503. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC. On file at the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, California. Brigandi, Phil 1998 Temecula: At the Crossroads of History. Heritage Media Corporation, Encinitas, California. Caughey, John W. 1970 California, A Remarkable State’s Life History. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Chapman, Charles E. 1921 A History of California: The Spanish Period. The Macmillan Company, New York. City of Rosemead 2010 City of Rosemead General Plan Update. Electronic document, https://p1cdn4static.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City %20Departments/Community%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf, accessed February 23, 2022. 2017 About Rosemead. Electronic document, https://www.cityofrosemead.org/visitors/ about_rosemead, accessed February 23, 2022. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6.0–2 Cook, Sherburne F. 1976 The Conflict Between the California Indian and White Civilization. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California. Dumke, Glenn S. 1944 The Boom of the Eighties in Southern California. Huntington Library Publications, San Marino, California. Erlandson, J.M., D.J. Kennett, B.L. Ingram, D.A. Guthrie, D.P. Morris, M.A. Tveshov, G.J. West, and P.L. Walker 1996 An Archaeological and Paleontological Chronology for Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261), San Miguel Island, California. Radiocarbon 38:355–373. Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell 2007 Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges. In California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by T.L. Jones and K.A. Klar, pp. 191–213. Altamira Press, New York. Heizer, Robert F. and Adam E. Treganza 1972 Mines and Quarries of the Indians of California. Ballena Press, Ramona, California. Hillhouse, J.W., E.G. Reichard, and D.J. Ponti 2002 Probing the Los Angeles Basin – Insights into ground-water resources and earthquake hazards. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 086-02. Electronic document, https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs086-02/fs086-02.pdf, accessed March 4, 2022. Johnson, J.R., T.W. Stafford, H.O. Ajie, and D.P. Morris 2002 Arlington Springs Revisited. In Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands Symposium, edited by D. Browne, K. Mitchell, and H. Chaney, pp. 541–545. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California. Johnson, Paul C., Dorothy Krell, John S. Weir, Harry Downie, Adrian Wilson, Joe Seney, Philip Spencer, and France Carpentier 1972 The California Missions: A Pictorial History. Sunset Books, Lane Publishing, Menlo Park, California. Koerper, Henry C., Roger D. Mason, and Mark L. Peterson 2002 Complexity, Demography, and Change in Late Holocene Orange County. In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, edited by J.M. Erlandson and T.L. Jones, pp. 63–81. University of California, Los Angeles, Institute of Archaeology. Los Angeles Times 1955 Keep Youths Busy. 24 April:46. Los Angeles, California. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6.0–3 1965 Vandals Desecrate Hard-Won Lawn. 28 December:85. Los Angeles, California. Moratto, Michael J. 1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, New York. Nevin, David 1978 The Mexican War. Time-Life Books, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia. Pourade, Richard F. 1961 Time of the Bells. The History of San Diego Volume 2. Union-Tribune Publishing Company, San Diego, California. 1963 The Silver Dons. The History of San Diego Volume 3. Union-Tribune Publishing Company, San Diego, California. Rick, T.C., J.M. Erlandson, and R.L. Vellanoweth 2001 Paleocoastal Fishing Along the Pacific Coast of the Americas: Evidence from Daisy Cave, San Miguel Island, California. American Antiquity 66:595–614. Rolle, Andrew F. 1969 California: A History (Second Edition). Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) 1995 Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento. Sutton, Mark Q. 2009 People and Language: Defining the Takic Expansion into Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 41(2&3):31–93. 2010 The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 44(2):1–54. Sutton, Mark Q. and Jill K. Gardner 2010 Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 42(4):1–64. Tan, S.S. 1998 Geologic map of the El Monte 7.5' quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California: a digital database. California Division of Mines and Geology Open-file report 98-29. Walker, Edwin Francis 1951 Five Prehistoric Sites in Los Angeles County, California. Publications of the Frederick Webb Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund 6:1–116. Southwest Museum, Los Angeles. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6.0–4 Wallace, William J. 1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214–230. 1986 Archaeological Research at Malaga Cove. In Symposium: A New Look at Some Old Sites, edited by G.S. Breschini and T. Haversat, pp. 21–27. Coyote Press Archives of California Archaeology, Salinas, California. Warren, Claude N. (editor) 1968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern Coast, In: Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, C.I. Williams ed. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3):1–14. Watson, Virginia 1991 Chatsworth History. The Chatsworth Historical Society, Chatsworth, California. Wirths, Todd A. 2022 Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project, City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. Unpublished report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX A Resumes of Key Personnel Brian F. Smith, MA Owner, Principal Investigator Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road — Suite A — Phone: (858) 679-8218 — Fax: (858) 679-9896 — E-Mail: bsmith@bfsa-ca.com Education Master of Arts, History, University of San Diego, California 1982 Bachelor of Arts, History, and Anthropology, University of San Diego, California 1975 Professional Memberships Society for California Archaeology Experience Principal Investigator 1977–Present Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. Poway, California Brian F. Smith is the owner and principal historical and archaeological consultant for Brian F. Smith and Associates. Over the past 32 years, he has conducted over 2,500 cultural resource studies in California, Arizona, Nevada, Montana, and Texas. These studies include every possible aspect of archaeology from literature searches and large-scale surveys to intensive data recovery excavations. Reports prepared by Mr. Smith have been submitted to all facets of local, state, and federal review agencies, including the US Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security. In addition, Mr. Smith has conducted studies for utility companies (Sempra Energy) and state highway departments (CalTrans). Professional Accomplishments These selected major professional accomplishments represent research efforts that have added significantly to the body of knowledge concerning the prehistoric life ways of cultures once present in the Southern California area and historic settlement since the late 18th century. Mr. Smith has been principal investigator on the following select projects, except where noted. Downtown San Diego Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Programs: Large numbers of downtown San Diego mitigation and monitoring projects, some of which included Broadway Block (2019), 915 Grape Street (2019), 1919 Pacific Highway (2018), Moxy Hotel (2018), Makers Quarter Block D (2017), Ballpark Village (2017), 460 16th Street (2017), Kettner and Ash (2017), Bayside Fire Station (2017), Pinnacle on the Park (2017), IDEA1 (2016), Blue Sky San Diego (2016), Pacific Gate (2016), Pendry Hotel (2015), Cisterra Sempra Office Tower (2014), 15th and Island (2014), Park and G (2014), Comm 22 (2014), 7th and F Street Parking (2013), Ariel Suites (2013), 13th and Marker (2012), Strata (2008), Hotel Indigo (2008), Lofts at 707 10th Avenue Project (2007), Breeza (2007), Bayside at the Embarcadero (2007), Aria (2007), Icon (2007), Vantage Pointe (2007), Aperture (2007), Sapphire Tower (2007), Lofts at 655 Sixth Avenue (2007), Metrowork (2007), The Legend (2006), The Mark (2006), Smart Corner (2006), Lofts at 677 7th Avenue (2005), Aloft on Cortez Hill (2005), Front and Beech Apartments (2003), Bella Via Condominiums (2003), Acqua Vista Residential Tower (2003), Northblock Lofts (2003), Westin Park Place Hotel (2001), Parkloft Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2 Apartment Complex (2001), Renaissance Park (2001), and Laurel Bay Apartments (2001). 1900 and 1912 Spindrift Drive: An extensive data recovery and mitigation monitoring program at the Spindrift Site, an important prehistoric archaeological habitation site stretching across the La Jolla area. The project resulted in the discovery of over 20,000 artifacts and nearly 100,000 grams of bulk faunal remains and marine shell, indicating a substantial occupation area (2013-2014). San Diego Airport Development Project: An extensive historic assessment of multiple buildings at the San Diego International Airport and included the preparation of Historic American Buildings Survey documentation to preserve significant elements of the airport prior to demolition (2017-2018). Citracado Parkway Extension: A still-ongoing project in the city of Escondido to mitigate impacts to an important archaeological occupation site. Various archaeological studies have been conducted by BFSA resulting in the identification of a significant cultural deposit within the project area. Westin Hotel and Timeshare (Grand Pacific Resorts): Data recovery and mitigation monitoring program in the city of Carlsbad consisted of the excavation of 176 one-square-meter archaeological data recovery units which produced thousands of prehistoric artifacts and ecofacts, and resulted in the preservation of a significant prehistoric habitation site. The artifacts recovered from the site presented important new data about the prehistory of the region and Native American occupation in the area (2017). The Everly Subdivision Project: Data recovery and mitigation monitoring program in the city of El Cajon resulted in the identification of a significant prehistoric occupation site from both the Late Prehistoric and Archaic Periods, as well as producing historic artifacts that correspond to the use of the property since 1886. The project produced an unprecedented quantity of artifacts in comparison to the area encompassed by the site, but lacked characteristics that typically reflect intense occupation, indicating that the site was used intensively for food processing (2014-2015). Ballpark Village: A mitigation and monitoring program within three city blocks in the East Village area of San Diego resulting in the discovery of a significant historic deposit. Nearly 5,000 historic artifacts and over 500,000 grams of bulk historic building fragments, food waste, and other materials representing an occupation period between 1880 and 1917 were recovered (2015-2017). Archaeology at the Padres Ballpark: Involved the analysis of historic resources within a seven-block area of the “East Village” area of San Diego, where occupation spanned a period from the 1870s to the 1940s. Over a period of two years, BFSA recovered over 200,000 artifacts and hundreds of pounds of metal, construction debris, unidentified broken glass, and wood. Collectively, the Ballpark Project and the other downtown mitigation and monitoring projects represent the largest historical archaeological program anywhere in the country in the past decade (2000-2007). 4S Ranch Archaeological and Historical Cultural Resources Study: Data recovery program consisted of the excavation of over 2,000 square meters of archaeological deposits that produced over one million artifacts, containing primarily prehistoric materials. The archaeological program at 4S Ranch is the largest archaeological study ever undertaken in the San Diego County area and has produced data that has exceeded expectations regarding the resolution of long-standing research questions and regional prehistoric settlement patterns. Charles H. Brown Site: Attracted international attention to the discovery of evidence of the antiquity of man in North America. Site located in Mission Valley, in the city of San Diego. Del Mar Man Site: Study of the now famous Early Man Site in Del Mar, California, for the San Diego Science Foundation and the San Diego Museum of Man, under the direction of Dr. Spencer Rogers and Dr. James R. Moriarty. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 3 Old Town State Park Projects: Consulting Historical Archaeologist. Projects completed in the Old Town State Park involved development of individual lots for commercial enterprises. The projects completed in Old Town include Archaeological and Historical Site Assessment for the Great Wall Cafe (1992), Archaeological Study for the Old Town Commercial Project (1991), and Cultural Resources Site Survey at the Old San Diego Inn (1988). Site W-20, Del Mar, California: A two-year-long investigation of a major prehistoric site in the Del Mar area of the city of San Diego. This research effort documented the earliest practice of religious/ceremonial activities in San Diego County (circa 6,000 years ago), facilitated the projection of major non-material aspects of the La Jolla Complex, and revealed the pattern of civilization at this site over a continuous period of 5,000 years. The report for the investigation included over 600 pages, with nearly 500,000 words of text, illustrations, maps, and photographs documenting this major study. City of San Diego Reclaimed Water Distribution System: A cultural resource study of nearly 400 miles of pipeline in the city and county of San Diego. Master Environmental Assessment Project, City of Poway: Conducted for the City of Poway to produce a complete inventory of all recorded historic and prehistoric properties within the city. The information was used in conjunction with the City’s General Plan Update to produce a map matrix of the city showing areas of high, moderate, and low potential for the presence of cultural resources. The effort also included the development of the City’s Cultural Resource Guidelines, which were adopted as City policy. Draft of the City of Carlsbad Historical and Archaeological Guidelines: Contracted by the City of Carlsbad to produce the draft of the City’s historical and archaeological guidelines for use by the Planning Department of the City. The Mid-Bayfront Project for the City of Chula Vista: Involved a large expanse of undeveloped agricultural land situated between the railroad and San Diego Bay in the northwestern portion of the city. The study included the analysis of some potentially historic features and numerous prehistoric Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Audie Murphy Ranch, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of 1,113.4 acres and 43 sites, both prehistoric and historic—included project coordination; direction of field crews; evaluation of sites for significance based on County of Riverside and CEQA guidelines; assessment of cupule, pictograph, and rock shelter sites, co-authoring of cultural resources project report. February- September 2002. Cultural Resources Evaluation of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Otay Ranch Village 13 Project, San Diego County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of 1,947 acres and 76 sites, both prehistoric and historic—included project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; assessment of sites for significance based on County of San Diego and CEQA guidelines; co- authoring of cultural resources project report. May-November 2002. Cultural Resources Survey for the Remote Video Surveillance Project, El Centro Sector, Imperial County: Project manager/director for a survey of 29 individual sites near the U.S./Mexico Border for proposed video surveillance camera locations associated with the San Diego Border barrier Project—project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; site identification and recordation; assessment of potential impacts to cultural resources; meeting and coordinating with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Border Patrol, and other government agencies involved; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. January, February, and July 2002. Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Menifee West GPA, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of nine sites, both prehistoric and historic—included project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; assessment of sites Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 4 for significance based on County of Riverside and CEQA guidelines; historic research; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. January-March 2002. Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed French Valley Specific Plan/EIR, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of two prehistoric and three historic sites—included project coordination and budgeting; survey of project area; Native American consultation; direction of field crews; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; cultural resources project report in prep. July-August 2000. Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Menifee Ranch, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of one prehistoric and five historic sites—included project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; feature recordation; historic structure assessments; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; historic research; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. February-June 2000. Salvage Mitigation of a Portion of the San Diego Presidio Identified During Water Pipe Construction for the City of San Diego, California: Project archaeologist/director—included direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis and authoring of cultural resources project report in prep. April 2000. Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Tyrian 3 Project, La Jolla, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel—included project coordination; assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural resources project report. April 2000. Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Lamont 5 Project, Pacific Beach, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel—included project coordination; assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural resources project report. April 2000. Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Reiss Residence Project, La Jolla, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel—included project coordination; assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural resources project report. March-April 2000. Salvage Mitigation of a Portion of Site SDM-W-95 (CA-SDI-211) for the Poinsettia Shores Santalina Development Project and Caltrans, Carlsbad, California: Project archaeologist/ director—included direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis and authoring of cultural resources project report in prep. December 1999-January 2000. Survey and Testing of Two Prehistoric Cultural Resources for the Airway Truck Parking Project, Otay Mesa, California: Project archaeologist/director—included direction of field crews; development and completion of testing recovery program; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. December 1999-January 2000. Cultural Resources Phase I and II Investigations for the Tin Can Hill Segment of the Immigration and Naturalization Services Triple Fence Project Along the International Border, San Diego County, California: Project manager/director for a survey and testing of a prehistoric quarry site along the border—NRHP eligibility assessment; project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; feature recordation; meeting and coordinating with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. December 1999-January 2000. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 5 Mitigation of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Westview High School Project for the City of San Diego, California: Project archaeologist/ director—included direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program including collection of material for specialized faunal and botanical analyses; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; co-authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. October 1999-January 2000. Mitigation of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Otay Ranch SPA-One West Project for the City of Chula Vista, California: Project archaeologist/director—included direction of field crews; development of data recovery program; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. September 1999-January 2000. Monitoring of Grading for the Herschel Place Project, La Jolla, California: Project archaeologist/ monitor— included monitoring of grading activities associated with the development of a single- dwelling parcel. September 1999. Survey and Testing of a Historic Resource for the Osterkamp Development Project, Valley Center, California: Project archaeologist/ director—included direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program; budget development; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report. July-August 1999. Survey and Testing of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Proposed College Boulevard Alignment Project, Carlsbad, California: Project manager/director —included direction of field crews; development and completion of testing recovery program; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. July-August 1999. Survey and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the Palomar Christian Conference Center Project, Palomar Mountain, California: Project archaeologist—included direction of field crews; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report. July-August 1999. Survey and Evaluation of Cultural Resources at the Village 2 High School Site, Otay Ranch, City of Chula Vista, California: Project manager/director —management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report. July 1999. Cultural Resources Phase I, II, and III Investigations for the Immigration and Naturalization Services Triple Fence Project Along the International Border, San Diego County, California: Project manager/director for the survey, testing, and mitigation of sites along border—supervision of multiple field crews, NRHP eligibility assessments, Native American consultation, contribution to Environmental Assessment document, lithic and marine shell analysis, authoring of cultural resources project report. August 1997- January 2000. Phase I, II, and II Investigations for the Scripps Poway Parkway East Project, Poway California: Project archaeologist/project director—included recordation and assessment of multicomponent prehistoric and historic sites; direction of Phase II and III investigations; direction of laboratory analyses including prehistoric and historic collections; curation of collections; data synthesis; coauthorship of final cultural resources report. February 1994; March-September 1994; September-December 1995. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX B Archaeological Records Search Results (Deleted for Public Review; Bound Separately) Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX C NAHC Sacred Lands File Search Results (Deleted for Public Review; Bound Separately) 1011 N. Armando Street, Anaheim, CA 92806-2606 (714) 630-1626 October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Mr. Erik Pfahler Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, 8601 Mission Drive, Rosemead, California Dear Mr. Pfahler, Pursuant to your request, Albus & Associates, Inc. is pleased to present to you our preliminary geotechnical investigation report, for the proposed development at the subject site. This report presents the results of our aerial photo and literature review, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering analyses. Conclusions and recommendations pertaining to the proposed site development are also presented herein based on the findings of our work. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you should have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. David E. Albus Principal Engineer Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1  1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ........................................................................................................ 1  1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... 1  1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................. 2  2.0 INVESTIGATION .................................................................................................................... 3  2.1 RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................ 3  2.2 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION .......................................................................................... 3  2.3 LABORATORY TESTING .................................................................................................... 3  3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 4  3.1 SOIL CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................... 4  3.2 GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 4  3.3 FAULTING ............................................................................................................................. 4  4.0 ANALYSES ............................................................................................................................... 5  4.1 SEISMICITY ........................................................................................................................... 5  4.2 STATIC SETTLEMENT ........................................................................................................ 6  5.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................... 7  5.1 FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................................... 7  5.2 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ......................................................................................................... 7  5.2.1 Ground Rupture ................................................................................................................ 7  5.2.2 Ground Shaking ................................................................................................................ 7  5.2.3 Landsliding ....................................................................................................................... 7  5.2.4 Liquefaction ...................................................................................................................... 7  5.3 STATIC SETTLEMENT ........................................................................................................ 8  5.4 EXCAVATION AND MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS .................................................. 8  5.5 SHRINKAGE AND SUBSIDENCE ....................................................................................... 8  5.6 SOIL EXPANSION ................................................................................................................. 9  6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................... 9  6.1 EARTHWORK ........................................................................................................................ 9  6.1.1 General Earthwork and Grading Specifications ............................................................... 9  6.1.2 Pre-Grade Meeting and Geotechnical Observation .......................................................... 9  6.1.3 Site Clearing...................................................................................................................... 9  6.1.4 Ground Preparation ......................................................................................................... 10  6.1.5 Fill Placement ................................................................................................................. 10  6.1.6 Import Materials .............................................................................................................. 10  6.1.7 Temporary Excavations .................................................................................................. 11  6.2 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS .................................................................................... 11  6.2.1 Mapped Seismic Design Parameters ............................................................................... 11  6.2.2 Site-Specific Seismic Design Parameters ....................................................................... 12  6.3 CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN ..................................................................... 12  6.3.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 12  6.3.2 Soil Expansion ................................................................................................................ 12  6.3.3 Static and Seismic Settlement ......................................................................................... 13  6.3.4 Allowable Bearing Value ................................................................................................ 13  6.3.5 Lateral Resistance ........................................................................................................... 13  6.3.6 Footing and Slab on Grade ............................................................................................. 13  Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page ii ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6.3.7 Foundation Observations ................................................................................................ 14  6.4 RETAINING AND SCREENING WALLS.......................................................................... 14  6.4.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 14  6.4.2 Allowable Bearing Value and Lateral Resistance .......................................................... 14  6.4.3 Active Earth Pressures .................................................................................................... 15  6.4.4 Drainage and Moisture-Proofing .................................................................................... 15  6.4.5 Foundation Observations ................................................................................................ 15  6.5 EXTERIOR FLATWORK .................................................................................................... 16  6.6 CONCRETE MIX DESIGN .................................................................................................. 17  6.7 CORROSION ........................................................................................................................ 17  6.8 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN ............................................................................. 17  6.8.1 Preliminary Pavement Structural Sections ...................................................................... 17  6.8.2 Subgrade Preparation ...................................................................................................... 18  6.8.3 Aggregate Base ............................................................................................................... 18  6.8.4 Asphaltic Concrete .......................................................................................................... 18  6.8.5 Concrete Paver ................................................................................................................ 18  6.8.6 Portland Cement Concrete .............................................................................................. 18  6.9 POST GRADING CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................. 19  6.9.1 Site Drainage and Irrigation ............................................................................................ 19  6.9.2 Utility Trenches .............................................................................................................. 19  6.10 PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES ................................................... 20  7.0 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 20  8.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 22  FIGURES AND PLATES Figure 1 - Site Location Map Plate 1 - Geotechnical Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A - EXPLORATION LOGS Plates A-1 through A-8 APPENDIX B - LABORATORY TESTS RESULTS Table B – Summary of Laboratory Test Results Plate B-1 through B-2 – Grain Size Distribution Plot Plate B-3 – Direct Shear Plot Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 1 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purposes of our preliminary geotechnical investigation were to evaluate geotechnical conditions within the project area and to provide conclusions and recommendations relevant to the design and construction of the proposed improvements at the subject site. The scope of this investigation included the following:  Review of the historical aerial photographs  Review of published geologic and seismic data for the site and surrounding area  Exploratory drilling and soil sampling  Laboratory testing of selected soil samples  Engineering analyses of data obtained from our review, exploration, and laboratory testing  Evaluation of site seismicity, liquefaction potential, and settlement potential  Preparation of this report 1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site is located at 8601 Mission Drive within the city of Rosemead, California. The APN parcel numbers for the current development are 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. The property is bordered by Mission Drive to the south, Walnut Grove Avenue, an existing easement for power lines, and a nursery to the west, and single-family residences to the north and east. The location of the site and its relationship to the surrounding areas are shown in Figure 1, Site Location Map. The site consists of an irregularly shaped property containing approximately 3.35 acres of land. The site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 357 to 363 feet above mean sea level (based on Google Earth). The site slopes gently down to the south. The site is currently vacant land with some improvements onsite. The perimeters of the site are bounded by chain-link fencing, masonry block walls, and plastic fencing. A short concrete driveway is located to the south and west. Along the southwest boundary of the property is existing overhead powerlines. Vegetation within the site consists of minor ground cover and some large palm trees within the southwest portion of the site. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 2 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. © 2021 Google N FIGURE 1-SITE LOCATION MAP Proposed Residential Development 8601 Mission Drive, Rosemead, California NOT TO SCALE 1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Based on our understanding, site development is anticipated to consist of multi-story (2 to 3), wood- framed buildings at grade. Associated interior driveways, decorative hardscape, parking areas and underground utilities are also anticipated. No grading or structural plans were available in preparing this proposal. However, we anticipate some minor cut and filling of the site will be required to achieve future surface configuration and we expect future foundation loads will be moderate. SITE Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 3 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2.0 INVESTIGATION 2.1 RESEARCH We have reviewed the referenced geologic publications and maps (see references). Data from these sources were utilized to develop some of the findings and conclusions presented herein. We have also reviewed available historical aerial photographs. The aerial photos indicate that in 1953, the site appears to have been graded but no improvements were constructed. By 1965, a large building had been constructed with a driveway entering from Walnut Grove Avenue to the western side of the building. An additional entrance from Mission drive runs to the south of the building and joins what appears to be an asphaltic parking area occupying the areas east and north of the building. From 1965 to 1988, the site appears relatively unchanged. By 1990, the building and associated improvements were gone and the site appears to have remained relatively unchanged since. 2.2 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Subsurface exploration for this investigation was conducted on September 7, 2021, and consisted of drilling six (6) soil borings to depths ranging from approximately 11.5 to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted, continuous flight, hollow- stem-auger drill rig. A representative of Albus & Associates, Inc. logged the exploratory borings. Visual and tactile identifications were made of the materials encountered, and their descriptions are presented in the Exploration Logs in Appendix A. The approximate locations of the exploratory excavations completed by this firm are shown on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Bulk, relatively undisturbed and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samples were obtained at selected depths within the exploratory borings for subsequent laboratory testing. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained using a 3-inch O.D., 2.5-inch I.D., California split-spoon soil sampler lined with brass rings. SPT samples were obtained from the boring using a standard, unlined SPT soil sampler. During each sampling interval, the sampler was driven 18 inches with successive drops of a 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler was recorded for each six inches of advancement. The total blow count for the lower 12 inches of advancement per soil sample is recorded on the exploration log. Samples were placed in sealed containers or plastic bags and transported to our laboratory for analyses. The borings were backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion of sampling. Two additional borings (P-1 and P-2) were drilled adjacent to boring B-1 for percolation testing. Details and results of percolation tests are reported under a separate cover. 2.3 LABORATORY TESTING Selected samples obtained from our subsurface exploration were tested in our soil laboratory. Tests consisted of in-situ moisture content and dry density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, expansion index, soluble sulfate content, direct shear, consolidation/collapse potential, grain- size distribution analysis, Atterberg limits, passing 200, and corrosivity testing (pH, chloride, and resistivity). A description of laboratory test criteria and test results are presented in Appendix B. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 4 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 SOIL CONDITIONS Review of the Diblee Map for the El Monte and Baldwin Park Quadrangles shows the site is designated as Quaternary Alluvium and falls within a flood plain and would have been subjected to seasonally- deposited materials associated with heavy rains from nearby mountain ranges to the north. Our exploration encounted artificial fills overlaying alluvial soils. Descriptions of the earth materials encountered during our investigation are summarized below and are presented in detail on the Exploration Logs presented in Appendix A. Fills up to about 2 feet thick appear to be present on site due to previous site improvements and grading. Fill materials typically consisted of fine to medium-grained silty sands. Alluvium was encountered underlying the artificial fill and generally consisted of interlayered silty sands, sands with silt, gravelly sands, and clayey sands. These materials were typically medium dense to very dense and damp. Alluvial soils were encountered to the maximum depth explored (51.5 feet). Within borings B-2 and B-3, cobbles were encountered at depths of approximately 10 feet. Due to the size of the cobbles, the hollow stem could not extract all the cobbles. As such, the cobbles generally remained within the borings and floated within the cuttings and around the stem. Sizes were either measured or visually observed within the boring shaft and are estimated to be 4 to 6 inches in diameter. 3.2 GROUNDWATER Groundwater was not encountered during this firm’s subsurface exploration to a depth of 51.5 feet. The CDMG Special Report 024 suggests that historic high groundwater for the subject site is approximately 60 feet. However, review of the Los Angeles County groundwater level data for the nearby well 2920G indicates that groundwater for the area is 231 feet below ground surface as of 2018. Well readings have been recorded from 5/1/1949 to 4/26/2018, and during this period, groundwater has fluctuated, but has continued to increase in depth from 126 feet (bgs) to 231 feet (bgs) during this time period. The last recorded reading at the time of this report was April 26, 2018 and indicated a depth of 231 feet. 3.3 FAULTING Based on our review of the referenced publications and seismic data, no active faults are known to project through or immediately adjacent to the subject sites and the sites do not lie within an “Earthquake Fault Zone” as defined by the State of California in Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Table 3.1 presents a summary of known seismically active faults within 10 miles of the sites based on the 2008 USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 5 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE 3.1 Summary of Faults Name Dist. (miles) Slip Rate (mm/yr.) Preferred Dip (degrees) Slip Sense Rupture Top (km) Fault Length (km) Elysian Park (Upper) 1.74 1.3 50 reverse 3 20 Raymond 2.81 1.5 79 strike slip 0 22 Verdugo 5.15 0.5 55 reverse 0 29 Sierra Madre Connected 6.11 2 51 reverse 0 76 Sierra Madre 6.11 2 53 reverse 0 57 Elsinore;W+GI+T+J+CM 6.66 n/a 84 strike slip 0 241 Elsinore;W 6.66 2.5 75 strike slip 0 46 Elsinore;W+GI 6.66 n/a 81 strike slip 0 83 Elsinore;W+GI+T 6.66 n/a 84 strike slip 0 124 Elsinore;W+GI+T+J 6.66 n/a 84 strike slip 0 199 Clamshell-Sawpit 7.75 0.5 50 reverse 0 16 Puente Hills (LA) 8.61 0.7 27 thrust 2.1 22 4.0 ANALYSES 4.1 SEISMICITY 2019 CBC requires seismic parameters in accordance with ASCE 7-16. Unless noted otherwise, all section numbers cited in the following refer to the sections in ASCE 7-16. Per Section 20.3 the project site was designated as Site Class D. We used the OSHPD seismic hazard tool to obtain the basic mapped acceleration parameters, including short periods (SS) and 1-second period (S1) MCER Spectral Response Accelerations. Section 11.4.8 requires site-specific ground hazard analysis for structures on Site Class E with SS greater than or equal to 1.0 or Site Class D or E with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2. Based on the mapped values of SS and S1 the project site falls within this category, requiring site specific hazard analysis in accordance with Section 21.2. However, “A ground motion hazard analysis is not required for structures where: Structures on Site Class D sites with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2, provided the value of the seismic response coefficient Cs is determined by Eq. (12.8-2) for values of T ≤ 1.5Ts and taken as equal to 1.5 times the value computed in accordance with either Eq. (12.8-3) for TL ≥ T > 1.5Ts or Eq. (12.8-4) for T > TL.” Assuming this exception is met for this project, a ground motion hazard analysis is not required and mapped seismic values can be used. Should this exception not be met, a ground motion hazard analysis Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 6 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. is required to determine the Design response spectra for the proposed structures at this site. Both mapped and site-specific seismic design parameters are provided in this report as presented in Section 6.2. Details of a ground motion hazard analysis are explained below. According to Section 21.2.3 (Supplement 1), the site-specific Risk Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) spectral response acceleration at any period is the lesser of the probabilistic and the deterministic response accelerations, subject to the exception specified in the same section. The probabilistic response spectrum was developed using the computer program OpenSHA (Field et al., 2013), which implements Method 1 as described in Section 21.2.1.1. Fault Models 3.1 and 3.2 from the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) were used as the earthquake rupture forecast models for the PSHA. In addition to known fault sources, background seismicity was also included in the PSHA. The ground motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) selected for use in this analysis are those developed for the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) West 2 project. Four GMPEs - Abrahamson et al. (2014), Boore et al. (2014), Campbell and Bozorgnia (2014), and Chiou and Youngs (2014) were used to perform the analysis. In accordance with Section 21.2.2 (Supplement 1), the deterministic spectral response acceleration at each period was calculated as the 84th percentile, 5% damped response acceleration, using NGA-West2 GMPE Worksheet. For this, the information from at least three causative faults with the greatest contribution per deaggregation analysis were used and the larger acceleration spectrum among these was selected as the deterministic response spectrum. The deterministic spectrum was adjusted per requirements in Section 21.2.2 (Supplement 1) where applicable. Both probabilistic and deterministic spectra were subjected to the maximum direction scale factors specified in Section 21.2 to produce the maximum acceleration spectra. Design response spectrum was developed by subjecting the site-specific MCER response spectrum to the provisions outlined in Section 21.3. This process included comparison with 80% code-based design spectrum determined in accordance with Section 11.4.6. The short period and long period site coefficient (Fa and Fv, respectively) were determined per Section 21.3 in conjunction with Table 11.4- 1. Site-specific design acceleration parameters (SMS, SM1, SDS, and SD1) were calculated according to Section 21.4. Per Section 11.2 (definitions on Page 79 of ASCE7-16) for evaluation of liquefaction, lateral spreading, seismic settlements, and other soil-related issues, Maximum Considered Earthquake Geometric Mean (MCEG) peak ground acceleration PGAM shall be used. The site-specific PGAM is calculated per Section 21.5.3, as the lesser of the probabilistic PGAM (Section 21.5.1) and deterministic PGAM (Section 21.5.2), but no less than 80% site modified peak ground acceleration, PGAM, obtained from OSHPD seismic hazard tool. From our analyses, we obtain a PGAM of 0.762g. 4.2 STATIC SETTLEMENT Analyses were performed for the potential settlement of the underlying soils encountered during our investigation. The site is predominately granular in nature. As such, analyses of settlement were based on the elastic method using estimated modulli correlated from N60 blow counts. Two analyses were performed to evaluate settlement of the structures. The first model was based on a conventional shallow strip footing 1.2 feet wide and a wall load of 3,000 psf. The second model was based on a Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 7 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. conventional square footing with 3 feet width and a column load of 3,000 psf. Both models yielded a total settlement of less than 0.5 inches. Both analyses assume the upper 2 feet of existing fill soils would be removed and replaced as compacted fill. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 5.1 FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT From a geotechnical point of view, the proposed site development is considered feasible, provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. Furthermore, it is also our opinion that the proposed development will not adversely impact the stability of adjoining properties. Key issues that could have significant fiscal impacts on the geotechnical aspects of the proposed site development are discussed in the following sections of this report. 5.2 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 5.2.1 Ground Rupture No known active faults are known to project through the subject sites nor do the sites lie within the boundaries of an “Earthquake Fault Zone” as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The closest known active fault is the Elysian Park (Upper) fault located approximately 1.74 miles away. Therefore, potential for ground rupture due to an earthquake beneath the sites is considered low. 5.2.2 Ground Shaking The site is situated in a seismically active area that has historically been affected by generally moderate to occasionally high levels of ground motion. The site lies in relatively close proximity to several seismically active faults; therefore, during the life of the proposed improvements, the property will probably experience similar moderate to occasionally high ground shaking from these fault zones, as well as some background shaking from other seismically active areas of the Southern California region. Design and construction in accordance with the current California Building Code (CBC) requirements is anticipated to address the issues related to potential ground shaking. 5.2.3 Landsliding Geologic hazards associated with landsliding are not anticipated at the site since the site is relatively level. 5.2.4 Liquefaction Engineering research of soil liquefaction potential (Youd, et al., 2001) indicates that generally three basic factors must exist concurrently in order for liquefaction to occur. These factors include:  A source of ground shaking, such as an earthquake, capable of generating soil mass distortions.  A relatively loose silty and/or sandy soil. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 8 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.  A relative shallow groundwater table (within approximately 50 feet below ground surface) or completely saturated soil conditions that will allow positive pore pressure generation. The site is not located within a State-designated zone of potentially liquefiable soils. Additionally, groundwater was not encountered to the maximum depth of 51.5 feet drilled during our site exploration. Furthermore, groundwater well measurements by the Los Angeles County in the vicinity of the project site since 1949 indicate that groundwater has been deeper than 50 feet for more than 70 years (well 1617N). Therefore, historical high groundwater is anticipated to be deeper than 50 feet below the ground surface. As a result, the potential for liquefaction to occur beneath the site is considered very low. 5.3 STATIC SETTLEMENT Analyses were performed to evaluate potential for static settlement of the underlying alluvium. Provided site grading is performed in accordance with the recommendations provided herein and based on the anticipated relatively light foundation loads, total and differential static settlement is not anticipated to exceed 1 inch and ½-inch over 30 feet, respectively, for the proposed residential structure. The estimated magnitudes of static settlements are considered within tolerable limits for the proposed structure. 5.4 EXCAVATION AND MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS Onsite earth materials are anticipated to be relatively easy to excavate with conventional heavy earthmoving equipment. The site earth materials are generally considered suitable for reuse as fill provided they are cleared on deleterious debris and oversized rocks (greater than 6 inches in greatest dimension). If encountered, portions of concrete debris and asphalt can likely be reduced in size (4” minus) and incorporated within fill soils during earthwork operations. Temporary construction slopes will be required to complete removal of unsuitable soils and for construction of underground utilities. Such excavations will require laybacks where they are surcharged or where they exceed 4 feet in height. Most of the near-surface soils are below optimum moisture content. As such, the addition of water to these materials will be required during placement and compaction as engineered fills. 5.5 SHRINKAGE AND SUBSIDENCE Volumetric changes in earth quantities will occur when excavated onsite soil materials are replaced as properly compacted fill. We estimate that the existing upper 5 feet of soils will shrink approximately 8 to 14 percent when removed and replaced as compacted fill. Subsidence due to reprocessing of removal bottoms is anticipated to be on the order of 0.10 feet. The estimates of shrinkage and subsidence are intended as an aid for project engineers in determining earthwork quantities. However, these estimates should be used with some caution since they are not absolute values. Contingencies should be made for balancing earthwork quantities based on actual shrinkage and subsidence that occurs during the grading process. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 9 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5.6 SOIL EXPANSION Based on our laboratory test results and the USCS visual manual classification, the near-surface soils are generally anticipated to possess a Very Low expansion potential. As such, special requirements as set forth in CBC Chapter 18 regarding expansive soils are not required. Additional testing for soil expansion will be required prior to construction of foundations and other concrete work to confirm these conditions. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 EARTHWORK 6.1.1 General Earthwork and Grading Specifications All earthwork and grading should be performed in accordance with applicable requirements of Cal/OSHA, applicable specifications of the Grading Codes of the City of Rosemead, California in addition to the recommendations presented herein. 6.1.2 Pre-Grade Meeting and Geotechnical Observation Prior to commencement of grading, we recommend a meeting be held between the developer, City Inspector, grading contractor, civil engineer, and geotechnical consultant to discuss the proposed grading and construction logistics. We also recommend a geotechnical consultant be retained to provide soil engineering and engineering geologic services during site grading and foundation construction. This is to observe compliance with the design specifications and recommendations and to allow for design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated. If conditions are encountered that appear to be different than those indicated in this report, the project geotechnical consultant should be notified immediately. Design and construction revisions may be required. 6.1.3 Site Clearing Areas to be graded should be cleared of vegetation, existing asphalt, underground improvements to be abandoned and deleterious materials. Existing underground utility lines within the project area that will be protected in place and that fall within a 1 to 1 (H:V) plane projected down from the edges of footings may be subject to surcharge loads. Under such conditions, this office should be made aware of these conditions for evaluation of potential surcharging. Supplemental recommendations may be required to protect such improvements in place. The project geotechnical consultant should be notified at the appropriate times to provide observation services during clearing operations to verify compliance with the above recommendations. Voids created by clearing and excavation should be left open for observation by the geotechnical consultant. Should any unusual soil conditions or subsurface structures be encountered during site clearing or grading that are not described or anticipated herein, these conditions should be brought to the immediate attention of the project geotechnical consultant for corrective recommendations as needed. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 10 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Temporary construction equipment (office trailers, power poles, etc.) should be positioned to allow adequate room for clearing and recommended ground preparation to be performed for proposed structures, pavements, and hardscapes. 6.1.4 Ground Preparation In general, the artificial fill is considered unsuitable for support of the proposed development. Artificial fill is estimated to typically be 2 feet thick. These materials should be removed from within the limits of residential structures and retaining walls. The removals should extend a minimum distance of 5 feet beyond the foundations. Artificial fill should also be removed below subgrade for pavement and screen walls. Such removals should extend at least 2 feet beyond the edges of pavement and footings where feasible. In addition to the general removal of existing fills, the alluvial soils should be over-excavated to a minimum depth of 1 foot below the bottoms of footings for the residential buildings. The actual depth of removal should be determined by the geotechnical consultant during grading. All removal excavations should be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant during grading to confirm the exposed conditions are as anticipated and to provide supplemental recommendations if required. The grading contractor should take appropriate measures when excavating adjacent any existing improvements to remain in-place to avoid disturbing or compromising support of existing structures. Following removals and overexcavation, the exposed grade should first be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to at least 110 percent of the optimum moisture content, and then compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM D 1557). 6.1.5 Fill Placement Materials excavated from the site may be reused as fill provided they are free of deleterious materials and particles greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension (oversized materials). Asphaltic and concrete debris generated during site demolition or encountered within the existing fill can be incorporated within new fill soils during earthwork operations provided they are reduced to no more than 4 inches in maximum dimension. Such materials should be mixed thoroughly with fill soils to prevent nesting. All fill should be placed in lifts no greater than 8 inches in loose thickness, moisture conditioned to at least the optimum moisture content, then compacted in place to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Each lift should be treated in a similar manner. Subsequent lifts should not be placed until the project geotechnical consultant has approved the preceding lift. 6.1.6 Import Materials If import materials are required to achieve the proposed finish grades, the proposed import soils should have an Expansion Index (EI, ASTM D 4829) less than 21 and possess negligible soluble sulfate concentrations. Import sources should be indicated to the geotechnical consultant prior to hauling the materials to the site so that appropriate testing and evaluation of the fill materials can be performed in advance. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 11 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6.1.7 Temporary Excavations The upper 2 to 4 feet of site materials generally consist of silt sands that may be temporarily cut vertical up to a maximum height of 4 feet provided they are not surcharged. Temporary excavations greater than 4 feet or exposing friable sandy soils should be laid back at a maximum gradient of 1.5:1 (H:V) or properly shored. Excavations should not be left open for prolonged periods of time. The project geotechnical consultant should observe all temporary cuts to confirm anticipated conditions and to provide alternate recommendations if conditions dictate. All excavations should conform to the requirements of Cal/OSHA. Based on the anticipated removal depths discussed herein and the current minimum setback of 15 feet for buildings from property lines, we anticipate that removals can be accomplished with open cuts. However, if deeper removals are required during grading or final building locations are closer to property lines and thereby result in insufficient room for recommended lay back cuts, shoring may be required. Additional recommendations for such conditions can be provided after reviewing final site plans and during grading. 6.2 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS 6.2.1 Mapped Seismic Design Parameters For design of the project in accordance with Chapter 16 of the 2019 CBC, the mapped seismic parameters may be taken as presented in the tables below. TABLE 6.1 2019 CBC Mapped Seismic Design Parameters Parameter Value Site Class D Mapped MCER Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SS 1.997 Mapped MCER Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, S1 0.722 Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Site Coefficient, Fv 1.7* Adjusted MCER Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SMS 1.997 Adjusted MCER Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, SM1 1.227 Design Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SDS 1.331 Design Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, SD1 0.818 Long-Period Transition Period, TL (sec.) 8 Seismic Design Category for Risk Categories I-IV II MCER = Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake *According to Section 11.4.8 in ASCE 7-16, “a ground motion hazard analysis shall be performed in accordance with Section 21.2 for the following structures on Site Class D and E sites with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2.” However, “A ground motion hazard analysis is not required for structures where: Structures on Site Class D sites with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2, provided the value of the seismic Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 12 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. response coefficient Cs is determined by Eq. (12.8-2) for values of T ≤ 1.5Ts and taken as equal to 1.5 times the value computed in accordance with either Eq. (12.8-3) for TL ≥ T > 1.5Ts or Eq. (12.8-4) for T > TL.” The Fv value of 1.7 above from Table 11.4-2 assumes that this exception is met and that a ground motion hazard analysis is not required. Should this exception not be met, the site-specific seismic design parameters provided in the next section should be used. 6.2.2 Site-Specific Seismic Design Parameters In addition to the Code Spectra parameters presented in Table 6.1, we have performed a site-specific ground motion hazard analysis in accordance with Chapter 21 of ASCE 7-16 to obtain site-specific seismic design acceleration parameters, the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake response spectrum, and the design earthquake response spectrum. The site-specific seismic design parameters are presented below. TABLE 6.2 2019 CBC Site Specific Seismic Design Parameters Parameter Value Site Class D Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Site Coefficient, Fv 2.5 Adjusted MCE Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SMS 1.837 Adjusted MCE Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, SM1 1.444 Design Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SDS 1.225 Design Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, SD1 1.087 MCE = Maximum Considered Earthquake 6.3 CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN 6.3.1 General The following design parameters are provided to assist the project structural engineer to design foundations for structures at the site. These design parameters are based on typical site materials encountered during subsurface exploration and are provided for preliminary design and estimating purposes. The project geotechnical consultant should provide final design parameters following observation and testing of site materials during grading. Depending on actual materials encountered during site grading, the design parameters presented herein may require modification. 6.3.2 Soil Expansion The recommendations presented herein are based on soils with a Very Low expansion potential. Following site grading, additional testing of site soils should be performed by the project geotechnical consultant to confirm the basis of these recommendations. If site soils with higher expansion potentials are encountered or imported to the site, the recommendations contained herein may require modification. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 13 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6.3.3 Static and Seismic Settlement Based on anticipated foundation loads and provided that the recommendations for ground preparation in this report are followed, total and differential static settlement are anticipated to be less than 1 inch and ½ inch over 30 feet, respectively. These values are considered within tolerable limits of proposed structures and site improvements. Design of the structures should consider these maximum anticipated settlements. 6.3.4 Allowable Bearing Value Foundations may utilize a bearing value of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for continuous and pad footings a minimum width of 12 inches and founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. This value may be increased by 300 psf and 800 psf for each additional foot in width and depth, respectively, up to a maximum value of 4,000 psf. Recommended allowable bearing values include both dead and live loads, and may be increased by one-third for wind and seismic forces. 6.3.5 Lateral Resistance A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (psf/ft) up to a maximum value of 1,500 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used to determine lateral bearing for footings. This value may be increased by one-third when designing for wind and seismic forces. A coefficient of friction of 0.48 times the dead load forces may also be used between concrete and the supporting soils to determine lateral sliding resistance. No increase in the coefficient of friction should be used when designing for wind and seismic forces. The above values are based on footings placed directly against compacted fill or competent native soils. In the case where footing sides are formed, all backfill against the footings should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard. 6.3.6 Footing and Slab on Grade Exterior and interior building footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches and 12 inches, respectively, below the lowest adjacent grade. All continuous footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 4 bars, one top and one bottom. The structural engineer may require different reinforcement and should dictate if greater than the recommendations provided herein. Interior isolated pad footings should be a minimum of 24 inches square and founded at minimum depths of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. Exterior isolated pad footings intended for support of patio covers or similar construction should be a minimum of 24 inches square and founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. Interior concrete slabs constructed on grade should be a minimum 4 inches thick and should be reinforced with No. 3 bars spaced 30 inches on center, each way. Care should be taken to ensure the placement of reinforcement at mid-slab height. The structural engineer may recommend a greater slab thickness and reinforcement based on proposed use and loading conditions and such recommendations should govern if greater than the recommendations presented herein. Concrete floor slabs in areas to receive carpet, tile, or other moisture sensitive coverings should be underlain with a minimum of 10-mil moisture vapor retarder conforming to ASTM E 1745-11, Class Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 14 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. A. The membrane should be properly lapped, sealed, and underlain with at least 2 inches of sand having a SE no less than 30. One inch of this sand may be placed over the membrane to aid in the curing of the concrete. This vapor retarder system is anticipated to be suitable for most flooring finishes that can accommodate some vapor emissions. However, this system may emit more than 4 pounds of water per 1000 sq. ft. and therefore, may not be suitable for all flooring finishes. Additional steps should be taken if such vapor emission levels are too high for anticipated flooring finishes. Special consideration should be given to slabs in areas to receive ceramic tile or other rigid, crack- sensitive floor coverings. Design and construction of such areas should mitigate hairline cracking as recommended by the structural engineer. Garage floor slabs should have a minimum thickness of 4 inches and should be reinforced in a similar manner as living floor slabs. Garage floor slabs should also be poured separately from adjacent wall footings with a positive separation maintained with 3/8-inch minimum felt expansion joint materials, and provided with saw cuts or cold joints at a maximum spacing of 12 feet in each direction. Consideration should be given to providing a vapor retarder below the garage slab to mitigate the potential for effervescence on the slab surface. Block-outs should be provided around interior columns to permit relative movement and mitigate distress to the floor slabs due to differential settlement that will occur between column footings and adjacent floor subgrade soils as loads are applied. 6.3.7 Foundation Observations Foundation excavation should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant to verify that they have been excavated into competent bearing soils and to the minimum embedment recommended above. These observations should be performed prior to placement of forms or reinforcement. The excavations should be trimmed neat, level and square. Loose, sloughed or moisture-softened materials and debris should be removed prior to placing concrete. 6.4 RETAINING AND SCREENING WALLS 6.4.1 General The following preliminary design and construction recommendations are provided for general retaining and screen walls supported by engineered compacted fill or competent native soils. Final wall designs specific to the site development should be provided for review once completed. The structural engineer and architect should provide appropriate recommendations for sealing at all joints and applying moisture-proofing material on the back of the walls. 6.4.2 Allowable Bearing Value and Lateral Resistance Design of retaining and screen walls may utilize the bearing and lateral resistance values provided in Section 6.3.4 and 6.3.5. The passive earth pressure for walls along property lines, where lateral removals are likely restricted, should be reduced by 25%. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 15 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6.4.3 Active Earth Pressures Static and seismic earth pressures for level and 2:1 (H:V) backfill conditions are provided in Table 6.3. Seismic earth pressures provided herein are based on the method provided by Seed & Whitman (1970) using a peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.44 g for 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. As indicated in Section 1803.5.12 of the 2019 CBC, retaining walls supporting 6 feet of backfill or less are not required to be designed for seismic earth pressures. The values provided in the following table do not consider hydrostatic pressure. Retaining walls should also be designed to support adjacent surcharge loads imposed by other nearby footings or traffic loads in addition to the earth pressure. 6.4.4 Drainage and Moisture-Proofing Retaining walls should be constructed with a perforated pipe and gravel subdrain to prevent entrapment of water in the backfill. The perforated pipe should consist of 4-inch-diameter, ABS SDR- 35 or PVC Schedule 40 with the perforations laid down. The pipe should be embedded in ¾- to 1½- inch open-graded gravel wrapped in filter fabric. The gravel should be at least one foot wide and extend at least one foot up the wall above the footing and drainage outlet. Drainage gravel and piping should not be placed below outlets and weepholes. Filter fabric should consist of Mirafi 140N, or equal. Outlet pipes should be directed to positive drainage devices. The use of weepholes may be considered in locations where aesthetic issues from potential nuisance water are not a concern. Weepholes should be 2 inches in diameter and provided at least every 6 feet on center. Where weepholes are used, perforated pipe may be omitted from the gravel subdrain. Retaining walls supporting backfill should also be coated with a moisture-proofing compound or covered with such material to inhibit infiltration of moisture through the walls. Moisture-proofing material should cover any portion of the back of wall that will be in contact with soil and should lap over and onto the top of footing. A drainage panel should be provided between the soil backfill and water proofing. The panel should extend from the top of the backdrain gravel up to within 12 inches of finish grade. The top of footing should be finished smooth with a trowel to inhibit the infiltration of water through the wall. The project structural engineer should provide specific recommendations for moisture-proofing, water stops, and joint details. 6.4.5 Foundation Observations Footing excavations should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant to verify that they have been excavated into competent bearing soils and to the minimum embedment recommended herein. These observations should be performed prior to placement of forms or reinforcement. The excavations should be trimmed neat, level and square. Loose, sloughed or moisture-softened materials and debris should be removed prior to placing concrete. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 16 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE 6.3 SEISMIC EARTH PRESSURES Pressure Diagram Static Seismic Total Component Component Force Pressure Values Walls Up To 10 Feet High Value Backfill Condition Level 2H:1V Slope A 28H 41H B 14H 14H C 21H 28H Note: H is in feet and resulting pressure is in psf. Design may utilize either the sum of the static component and the seismic component force diagrams or the total force diagram above. SEAOSC has suggested using a load factor of 1.7 for the static component and 1.0 for the seismic component. The actual load factors should be determined by the structural engineer. 6.5 EXTERIOR FLATWORK Concrete sidewalks, patios, and similar flatwork should be a nominal 4 inches thick and provided with saw cuts or expansion joints at spacing no greater than 10 feet in each direction. Special jointing details should be provided in areas of block-outs, notches, or other irregularities to avoid cracking at points of high stress. Drainage from flatwork areas should be directed to local area drains and/or other appropriate collection devices designed to carry runoff water to the street or other approved drainage structures. The concrete flatwork should also be sloped at a minimum gradient of 0.5 percent away from building foundations and retaining walls. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 17 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Subgrade soils below flatwork should be thoroughly moistened to at least 100 percent of the optimum moisture content to a depth of 12 inches. Flooding or ponding of the subgrade is not recommended. Moistening should be accomplished by lightly spraying the area over a period of a few days just prior to pouring concrete. The geotechnical consultant should observe and verify the density and moisture content of subgrade soils prior to pouring concrete to ensure that the required compaction and pre- moistening recommendations have been met. 6.6 CONCRETE MIX DESIGN Laboratory testing of near-surface soils for soluble sulfate content indicates soluble sulfate concentration of 0.001%. We recommend following the procedures provided in ACI 318, Section 4.3, Table 4.3.1 for negligible sulfate exposure. Upon completion of rough grading, an evaluation of as- graded conditions and further laboratory testing should be completed for the site to confirm or modify the recommendations provided in this section. 6.7 CORROSION Results of preliminary testing of soils for pH, chloride, and minimum resistivity indicate the site is potentially Corrosive to metals that are in contact or close proximity to onsite soils. As such, specific recommendations should be obtained from a corrosion specialist if construction will include metals that will be near or in direct contact with site soils. 6.8 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN 6.8.1 Preliminary Pavement Structural Sections Based on the soil conditions present at the site and an estimated traffic index, preliminary pavement sections are provided in the table below. An assumed “R-value” of 30 was used for the near-surface soil in this preliminary pavement design. The sections provided below are for planning purposes only and should be re-evaluated subsequent to site grading. Final pavement sections should be based on actual R-value testing of in-place soils and analysis of anticipated traffic. TABLE 6.4 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTIONS Location Traffic Index AC (inches) Concrete Pavers (mm) PCC (inches) AB (inches) Entry Way and Drives 5.5 3.0 4.0 -- -- 8.0 5.0 -- -- 6.5 -- -- 80.0 -- 8.0 Parking Stalls -- 3.0 -- -- 4.0 Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 18 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6.8.2 Subgrade Preparation Prior to placement of paving elements, subgrade soils should be scarified 6 inches, moisture- conditioned to above the optimum moisture content then compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D1557. Areas observed to pump or yield under vehicle traffic should be removed and replaced with firm and unyielding engineered compacted soil or aggregate base materials. 6.8.3 Aggregate Base Aggregate base materials should be Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base conforming to Section 200-2 of the Standard Specification for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) or Class 2 Aggregate Base conforming to the Caltrans’ Standard Specifications. The materials should be moisture conditioned to slightly over the optimum moisture content then compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D 1557. 6.8.4 Asphaltic Concrete Paving asphalt should be PG 64-10 conforming to the requirements of Section 203-1 of the Greenbook. Asphalt concrete materials should conform to Section 203-6 and construction should conform to Section 302 of the Greenbook. 6.8.5 Concrete Paver Concrete pavers should conform to the requirements of ASTM C 936. Construction of the pavers, including bedding sand, should follow manufacturer’s specifications. Typical thickness of bedding sand is about 1 inch. The gradation of bedding sand should meet the requirement in Table 6.5. TABLE 6.5 Gradation for Sand Bedding Sieve Size Percent Passing ⅜” 100 No. 4 95 - 100 No. 8 80 - 100 No. 16 50 - 85 No. 30 25 - 60 No. 50 5 - 30 No. 100 0 - 10 No. 200 0 - 1 6.8.6 Portland Cement Concrete Portland cement concrete used to construct concrete paving should conform to Section 201 of the Greenbook and should have a minimum compressive strength of 3,250 pounds per square inch (psi) at 28 days. Reinforcement and jointing of concrete pavement sections should be designed according to the minimum recommendations provided by the Portland Cement Association (PCA). For rigid pavement, transverse and longitudinal contraction joints should be provided at spacing no greater than 15 feet. Score joints may be constructed by saw cutting to a depth of ¼ of the slab thickness. Expansion/cold joints may be used in lieu of score joints. Such joints should be properly sealed. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 19 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Where traffic will traverse over cold joints without keyways or dowels or edges of concrete paving, the edges should be thickened by 20% of the design thickness toward the edge over a horizontal distance of 5 feet. 6.9 POST GRADING CONSIDERATIONS 6.9.1 Site Drainage and Irrigation The ground immediately adjacent to foundations should be provided with positive drainage away from the structures in accordance with 2019 CBC, Section 1804.4. However, the slope of the ground surface may be reduced to 2% based on climatic and soil conditions. No rain or excess water should be allowed to pond against structures such as walls, foundations, flatwork, etc. Excessive irrigation water can be detrimental to the performance of the proposed site development. Water applied in excess of the needs of vegetation will tend to percolate into the ground. Such percolation can lead to nuisance seepage and shallow perched groundwater. Seepage can form on slope faces, on the faces of retaining walls, in streets, or other low-lying areas. These conditions could lead to adverse effects such as the formation of stagnant water that breeds insects, distress or damage of trees, surface erosion, slope instability, discoloration and salt buildup on wall faces, and premature failure of pavement. Excessive watering can also lead to elevated vapor emissions within buildings that can damage flooring finishes or lead to mold growth inside the home. Key factors that can help mitigate the potential for adverse effects of overwatering include the judicious use of water for irrigation, use of irrigation systems that are appropriate for the type of vegetation and geometric configuration of the planted area, the use of soil amendments to enhance moisture retention, use of low-water demand vegetation, regular use of appropriate fertilizers, and seasonal adjustments of irrigation systems to match the water requirements of vegetation. Specific recommendations should be provided by a landscape architect or other knowledgeable professional. 6.9.2 Utility Trenches Trench excavations should be constructed in accordance with the recommendations contained in Section 6.1.7 of this report. Trench excavations must also conform to the requirements of Cal/OSHA. Trench backfill materials and compaction criteria should conform to the requirements of the local municipalities. As a minimum, utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Materials placed within the pipe zone (6 inches below and 12 inches above the pipe) should consist of particles no greater than ¾ inches and have a SE of at least 30. The materials within the pipe zone should be moisture-conditioned and compacted by hand-operated compaction equipment. Above the pipe zone (>1 foot above pipe), the backfill may consist of general fill materials. Trench backfill should be moisture-conditioned to slightly over the optimum moisture content, placed in lifts no greater than 12 inches in thickness, and then mechanically compacted with appropriate equipment to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard. For trenches with sloped walls, backfill material should be placed in lifts no greater than 8 inches in loose thickness, and then compacted by rolling with a sheepsfoot roller or similar equipment. The project geotechnical consultant should perform density testing along with probing to verify that adequate compaction has been achieved. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 20 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Within shallow trenches (less than 18 inches deep) where pipes may be damaged by heavy compaction equipment, imported clean sand having a SE of 30 or greater may be utilized. The sand should be placed in the trench, thoroughly watered, and then compacted with a vibratory compactor. For utility trenches located below a 1:1 (H:V) plane projecting downward from the outside edge of the adjacent footing base or crossing footing trenches, concrete or slurry should be used as trench backfill. 6.10 PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES We recommend Albus & Associates, Inc. be engaged to review any future development plans, including civil plans (grading plans), foundation plans, and proposed structural loads, prior to construction. This is to verify that the assumptions of this report are valid and that the preliminary conclusions and recommendations contained in this report have been properly interpreted and are incorporated into the project plans and specifications. If we are not provided the opportunity to review these documents, we take no responsibility for misinterpretation of our preliminary conclusions and recommendations. We recommend that a geotechnical consultant be retained to provide soil engineering services during construction of the project. These services are to observe compliance with the design, specifications or recommendations, and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. If the project plans change significantly from the assumed development described herein, the project geotechnical consultant should review our preliminary design recommendations and their applicability to the revised construction. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those indicated in this report or subsequent design reports, the project geotechnical consultant should be notified immediately. Design and construction revisions may be required. 7.0 LIMITATIONS This report is based on the proposed development and geotechnical data as described herein. The materials encountered on the project site and utilized in our laboratory testing for this investigation are believed representative of the total project area, and the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are presented on that basis. However, soil and bedrock materials can vary in characteristics between points of exploration, both laterally and vertically, and those variations could affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. As such, observation and testing by a geotechnical consultant during the grading and construction phases of the project are essential to confirming the basis of this report. This report has been prepared consistent with that level of care being provided by other professionals providing similar services at the same locale and time period. The contents of this report are professional opinions and as such, are not to be considered a guaranty or warranty. This report should be reviewed and updated after a period of one year or if the site ownership or project concept changes from that described herein. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 21 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Borstein Enterprises and their project consultants in the planning and design of the proposed development. This report has not been prepared for use by parties or projects other than those named or described herein. This report may not contain sufficient information for other parties or other purposes. This report is subject to review by the controlling governmental agency. Respectfully submitted, ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Eung Jin Jeon, Ph.D. David E. Albus Associate Engineer Principal Engineer G.E. 3097 G.E. 2455 Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 22 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 8.0 REFERENCES Publications Abrahamson, N.A., Silva, W.J., and Kamai, R. 2014., “Update of the AS08 Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Based on the NGA-West2 Data Set.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1179-1197. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-16. Boore, D.M., Stewart, J.P., Seyhan, E., and Atkinson, G.M., 2014. “NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1057-1085. Dibblee, T.W., Jr. 1999. Geologic map of the El Monte and Baldwin Park quadrangles, Los Angeles, California: Dibblee Geological Foundation, Map DF-69, scale 1:24,000. California Geologic Survey, 2008. Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, Special Publication 117A. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1998. “Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Whittier 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angles and Orange Counties, California.” Seismic Hazard Report 037. Campbell, K.W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2014. “NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped Linear Acceleration Response Spectra.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1087-1115. Chiou, B.S.-J., and Youngs, R.R., 2014. “Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra, Earthquake Spectra, 30 (3): 1117-1153. Field, E.H., Biasi, G.P., Bird, P., Dawson, T.E., Felzer, K.R., Jackson, D.D., Johnson, K.M., Jordan, T.H., Madden, C., Michael, A.J., Milner, K.R., Page, M.T., Parsons, T., Powers, P.M., Shaw, B.E., Thatcher, W.R., Weldon, R.J., II, and Zeng, Y., 2013, Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 3 (UCERF3)—The time-independent model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1165, 97 p., California Geological Survey Special Report 228, and Southern California Earthquake Center Publication 1792, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1165/. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Well Data (accessed 2020): https://dpw.lacounty.gov/general/wells/ Seed, H.B., and Whitman, R.V., 1970. “Design of Earth Retaining Structures for Dynamic Loads,” ASCE Specialty Conference, Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth Retaining Structures, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York, 103-147. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 23 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. REFERENCES (cont.) Youd, T.L., Idriss, I.M., Andrus, R.D., Arango, I., Castro, G., Christian, J., Dobry, R., Finn, W.D.L., Harder, L.F., Hynes, M.E., Ishihara, K., Koester, J.P., Liao, S.S.C., Marcuson, W.F., Martin, G.R., Mitchell, J.K., Moriwaki, Y., Power, M.S., Robertson, P.K., Seed, R.B., and Stokoe, K.H. 2001. “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils.” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 127 (10): 817-833. APPROXIMATEPROJECT SITE LIMITSB-1P-2P-1B-2B-3B-4B-5B-6EXPLANATION(Locations Approximate)0 50 100 200APPROX SCALE : 1" = 100'- Exploratory Boring- Percolation Test Boring1Plate:Date: 10/27/20213016.00Job No.:GEOTECHNICAL MAP©Google 2021 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX A EXPLORATION LOGS Field Identification Sheet Light gray Description Order: Description, Color, Moisture, Density, Grain Size, Additional Description Gray Description % 0-5 trace 5-15 Dark gray with 15-30 30+Gravelly Sand with Silt trace Clay Moisture Silty Clay with Sand trace Gravel Gray Brown Dry Damp Moist Light brown Very Moist Wet Brown Density (Navfac) SPT CA 0-3 0-5 Dark Brown 3-8 5-13 8-14 13-22 14-25 22-40 Olive brown 25> 40> 2< 0-3 Olive 2-4 3-6 4-8 6-13 8-15 13-24 Yellow 15-30 24-48 30> 48> Yellowish brown Grain Size Description Sieve Size Approx. Size >12" Larger than basketball Yellowish red 3-12" Fist to basketball coarse 3/4-3" Thumb to Fist fine #4-3/4" Pea to Thumb Red coarse #10-4 Rock Salt to Pea medium #40-10 Sugar to Rock Salt fine #200-40 Flour to Sugar Reddish Brown Pass #200 Smaller than Flour Additional Description (ie. roots, pinhole pores, debris, etc.) Tan Trace 5% Moderate 15% Abundant 30% Albus & Associates, Inc. Plate A-0 absence of water near optimum below optimum Very Loose Sand Sand trace Silt Sand with Silt Silty Sand Example Very Soft Soft Stiff above optimum free water visible Loose Medium Dense More Examples Fines Sand Gravel Sand with Silt and Clay Sand trace Silt and Clay Sand with Silt trace Clay Very Stiff Hard Fine grained soils Medium Stiff Boulders Cobbles Dense Coarse grained soils Very Dense Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G WaterCoreBulk5 10 15 20 EXPLANATION Solid lines separate geologic units and/or material types. Dashed lines indicate unknown depth of geologic unit change or material type change. Solid black rectangle in Core column represents California Split Spoon sampler (2.5in ID, 3in OD). Double triangle in core column represents SPT sampler. Vertical Lines in core column represents Shelby sampler. Solid black rectangle in Bulk column respresents large bag sample. Other Laboratory Tests: Max = Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content EI = Expansion Index SO4 = Soluble Sulfate Content DSR = Direct Shear, Remolded DS = Direct Shear, Undisturbed SA = Sieve Analysis (1" through #200 sieve) Hydro = Particle Size Analysis (SA with Hydrometer) 200 = Percent Passing #200 Sieve Consol = Consolidation SE = Sand Equivalent Rval = R-Value ATT = Atterberg Limits Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-1 358 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 25 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM):Light brown, dry, fine to medium grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand with Gravel trace Silt (SP):Brown to yellowish brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Sand with Gravel (SP):Yellowish brown, damp to moist, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Gravelly Sand (SW):Yellowish brown, damp to moist, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand @ 10 ft, more coarse grained sand @ 15 ft, dry to damp, very dense Silty Sand (SM):Brown to yellowish brown, moist, very dense, fine grained sand @ 20 ft, medium dense Sand with Gravel trace Silt (SP):Brown, moist, dense, more fine grained sand 34 37 17 10 21 20 28 3.6 2.9 3.2 2.6 117.4 112.4 103.9 112.8 Max EI SO4 DS pH Resist Ch SA Hydro 200 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-2 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-1 358 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 35 40 45 50 Yellowish brown, very dense, more fine to coarse grained sand Gravelly Sand (SP):Light reddish brown, dry to damp, very dense, fine to coarse grained sand Sand with Silt (SP):Light reddish brown, damp to moist, very dense, fine grained sand Silty Sand (SM):Light reddish brown, damp to moist, very dense, fine grained sand, moderate fines Clayey Sand (SC):Brown to reddish brown, moist, hard, fine grained sand Total Depth 51.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 52 49 36 61 30 SA Hydro 200 200 ATT Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-3 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-2 357.9 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Gravelly Sand (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand @ 6 ft, dense, gravel up to 1 inch dia @ 10 ft, medium dense, cobbles observed in cuttings up to 6 inch dia Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 15 28 25 30 2.7 3.3 112.4 200 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-4 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-3 357.9 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Gravelly Sand trace Silt (SP): Yellowish brown, dry to damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand @ 4 ft, damp, loose, no silt, gravel up to 1 inch dia @ 6 ft, moist, medium dense @ 10 ft, 4 inch dia cobble observed in cuttings Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 19 12 27 2.3 3.1 3.4 104.9 109.8 Consol Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-5 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-4 358 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, moist, loose, fine to coarse grained sand Sand with Gravel (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, loose, fine to coarse grained sand @ 6 ft, medium dense @ 10 ft, more coarse grained sand Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 31 15 13 17 3.7 3.8 2.8 4.5 112.9 107.2 105.9 Consol Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-6 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-5 361 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand @ 4 ft, Yellowish brown Sand with Gravel (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 17 20 34 3.4 4.6 3.1 108.7 -31.3 111.1 200 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-7 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-6 361.2 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Gravelly Sand (SP): Yellowish brown, damp, loose, fine to coarse grained sand @ 6 ft, medium dense, more coarse grained sand @ 10 ft, dense, more gravel 46 16 15 24 3.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 103.2 108.5 109.8 200 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-8 Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM Soil Classification Soils encountered within the exploratory borings were initially classified in the field in general accordance with the visual-manual procedures of the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2488). The samples were re-examined in the laboratory and classifications reviewed and then revised where appropriate. The assigned group symbols are presented on the Exploration Logs provided in Appendix A. In-Situ Moisture Content and Dry Density Moisture content and dry density of in-place soil materials were determined in representative strata. Test data are summarized on the Exploration Logs, Appendix A. Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were performed on a representative sample of the site materials obtained from our field explorations. The test was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557. Pertinent test values are given in Table B-1. Expansion Potential Expansion index testing was performed on a selected sample. The test was performed in accordance with ASTM D4829. The test result and expansion potential are presented on Table B-1. Soluble Sulfate Content A chemical analysis was performed on a selected sample to determine soluble sulfate content. This test was performed in our soil laboratory in accordance with California Test Method No 417. The test result is included on Table B-1. Atterberg Limits Atterberg Limits (Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index) were performed in accordance with Test Method ASTM D 4318. Pertinent test values are presented within Table B-1. Particle Size Analyses Particle size analyses were performed on representative samples of site materials in accordance with ASTM D 422. The results are presented graphically on the attached Plates B-1 and B-2. Direct Shear The Coulomb shear strength parameters, angle of internal friction and cohesion, were determined for a bulk sample and intact samples obtained from one our borings. The tests were performed in general conformance with Test Method ASTM D 3080. The bulk sample was remolded to 90 percent of maximum dry density and at the optimum moisture content. Three specimens were prepared for each test, artificially saturated, and then sheared under varied loads at an appropriate constant rate of strain. Results are graphically presented on Plate B-3. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Corrosion Select samples were tested for minimum resistivity, chloride, pH in accordance with California Test Method 643. Results of these tests are provided in Table B-1. TABLE B-1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Boring No. Sample Depth (ft) Soil Description Test Results B-1 0-5 Silty Sand with Gravel Max. Dry Density (pcf): Opt. Moisture Content (%): Expansion Index: Expansion Potential: Soluble Sulfate Content: Sulfate Exposure: PH: Chloride content (ppm): Resistivity (ohms): 132.5 6.5 0 Very Low 0.005% Negligible 6.86 75 3900 B-1 20 Silty Sand Passing No. 200 Sieve: 43.4 B-1 35 Gravelly Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 11.1 B-1 45 Sand with Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 17.7 B-1 50 Sandy Clay with Silt Liquid Limit (%): Plasticity Index (%): 25 7.2 B-2 10 Gravelly Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 10.7 B-5 10 Gravelly Sand with Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 20.3 B-6 4 Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 6.2 Note: Additional laboratory test results are provided on the boring logs provided in Appendix A. COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE Description Sand with Gravel trace Silt Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-1 3016.00 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Number Location B-1 GRAVELCOBBLES SILT AND CLAYSAND 15 Depth 6"3"1.5"3/4"3/8"4 10 20 40 60 100 200 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.00010.0010.010.1110100 U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes Percent RetainedPercent PassingGrain Size in Millimeters COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE Description Sand with Gravel trace Silt Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-2 3016.00 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Number Location B-1 GRAVELCOBBLES SILT AND CLAYSAND 30 Depth 6"3"1.5"3/4"3/8"4 10 20 40 60 100 200 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.00010.0010.010.1110100 U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes Percent RetainedPercent PassingGrain Size in Millimeters CONSOLIDATION Job Number Location Depth 3016.00 B-3 6 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-3 Description Sand 102.5 4 18.2 Initial Dry Density (pcf)Initial Moisture Content (%)Final Moisture Concent (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 1000 10000 100000CONSOLIDATION (%)NORMAL STRESS (psf) Field Saturated CONSOLIDATION Job Number Location Depth 3016.00 B-4 6 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-4 Description Sand 106.5 4.9 18.7 Initial Dry Density (pcf)Initial Moisture Content (%)Final Moisture Concent (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 1000 10000 100000CONSOLIDATION (%)NORMAL STRESS (psf) Field Saturated DIRECT SHEAR Sample Type: Normal Stress (ksf)1 2 4 Peak Shear Stress (ksf)0.924 2.256 4.416 Peak Displacement (in)0.02 0.022 0.023 Ultimate Shear Stress (ksf)0.552 1.704 3.408 Ultimate Displacement (in)0.24 0.25 0.25 Initial Dry Density (pcf)124.5 124.5 124.5 Initial Moisture Content (%)2 2 2 Final Moisture Content (%)7.2 7.1 6.7 Strain Rate (in/min) Job Number Location Depth 3016.00 B-1 0-5 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-5 Description Silty Sand with Gravel 0.05 Saturated, Remolded -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0 2 4 6 8 10 Vertical Displacement (in)Strain (%) 1 2 4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Shear Stress (ksf)Strain (%) 1 2 4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5SHEAR STRESS (ksf)NORMAL STRESS (ksf) Peak Ultimate Linear (Peak) Linear (Ultimate) PALEONTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE 8601 MISSION DRIVE PROJECT CITY OF ROSEMEAD, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APNs 5389-009-029, -30, and -031 Prepared on Behalf of: Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025 Prepared for: City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Prepared by: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 March 7, 2022 Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Paleontological Database Information Author: Todd A. Wirths, M.S., Senior Paleontologist, California Professional Geologist No. 7588 Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 679-8218 Report Date: March 7, 2022 Report Title: Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project, City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California Prepared on Behalf of: Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025 Prepared for: City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Prepared by: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 5389-009-029, -030, and -031 USGS Quadrangle: Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 11 West, on the USGS El Monte, California Quadrangle (7.5-minute) Study Area: 3.38 acres Key Words: City of Rosemead; Paleontological assessment; Holocene alluvial fan deposits; Low sensitivity; no monitoring recommended. Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Section Page I. INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION .........................................................................1 II. REGULATORY SETTING .........................................................................................1 State of California .....................................................................................................1 City of Rosemead ........................................................................................................4 III. GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................4 IV. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES........................................................................4 Definition ....................................................................................................................4 Fossil Locality Search ................................................................................................6 V. PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY ........................................................................6 Overview .....................................................................................................................6 Professional Standards ..............................................................................................6 Field Survey ................................................................................................................7 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................7 Paleontological MMRP..............................................................................................8 VII. CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................10 VIII. REFERENCES..........................................................................................................10 Appendices Appendix A – Qualifications of Key Personnel Appendix B – Paleontological Records Search List of Figures Figure Page Figure 1 General Location Map .................................................................................2 Figure 2 Project Location Map ...................................................................................3 Figure 3 Geologic Map ...............................................................................................5 Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 I. INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION A paleontological resource assessment has been completed for the 8601 Mission Drive Project, located northeast of the intersection of Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue in Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California (Figures 1 and 2). The 3.36-acre project occupies three parcels (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 5389-009-029, -030, and -031). On the United States Geological Survey 7.5-minute, 1:24,000-scale El Monte, California topographic quadrangle map, the project is located in unsectioned Township 1 South, Range 11 West (projected), San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian (see Figure 2). The project will include the construction of 37 single-family residential lots with associated landscaping and infrastructure. Currently, the subject property is vacant. As the lead agency, the City of Rosemead has required the preparation of a paleontological assessment to evaluate the project’s potential to yield paleontological resources. The paleontological assessment of the project included a review of paleontological literature and fossil locality records in the area; a review of the underlying geology; and recommendations to mitigate impacts to potential paleontological resources, if necessary. II. REGULATORY SETTING The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which is patterned after the National Environmental Policy Act, is the overriding environmental regulation that sets the requirement for protecting California’s paleontological resources. CEQA mandates that governing permitting agencies (lead agencies) set their own guidelines for the protection of nonrenewable paleontological resources under their jurisdiction. State of California Under “Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA,” as amended in December 2018 (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 et seq.), procedures define the types of activities, persons, and public agencies required to comply with CEQA. Section 15063 of the CCR provides a process by which a lead agency may review a project’s potential impact to the environment, whether the impacts are significant, and provide recommendations, if necessary. In CEQA’s Environmental Checklist Form, one of the questions to answer is, “Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?” (Appendix G, Section VII, Part f). This is to ensure compliance with California Public Resources Code Section 5097.5, the law that protects nonrenewable resources, including fossils: Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 a) A person shall not knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy, injure or deface any historic or prehistoric ruins, burial grounds, archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints, inscriptions made by human agency, rock art, or any other archaeological, paleontological or historical feature, situated on public lands, except with the express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction over such lands. b) As used in this section, “public lands” means lands owned by, or under the jurisdiction of, the state, or any city, county, district, authority, or public corporation, or any agency thereof. c) A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. City of Rosemead The General Plan Update of the City of Rosemead does not discuss paleontological resources (City of Rosemead 2010). III. GEOLOGY The project is located within the San Gabriel Valley Basin of the larger Los Angeles Basin, a large structural sedimentary basin bounded and cut through by several active fault systems in the Los Angeles metropolitan area (Hillhouse et al. 2002). The concrete-lined Rubio Wash, a tributary to the Rio Hondo, flows southward approximately a quarter mile east of the project. As mapped by Tan (1998), the project is underlain by unconsolidated Holocene sandy and gravelly young alluvial fan and valley deposits (pale tan and yellow areas labeled “Qyfa” and “Qyfag,” respectively, on Figure 3). IV. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES Definition Paleontological resources are the remains of prehistoric life that have been preserved in geologic strata. These remains are called fossils and include bones, shells, teeth, and plant remains (including their impressions, casts, and molds) in the sedimentary matrix, as well as trace fossils such as footprints and burrows. Fossils are considered older than 5,000 years of age (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 2010) but may include younger remains (subfossils), for example, when viewed in the context of local extinction of the organism or habitat. Fossils are considered a nonrenewable resource under state and local guidelines (see Section II of this report). Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Fossil Locality Search A prior paleontological locality and records search was performed for the nearby 12247 Elliott Avenue Project by the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) (Bell 2021 [Appendix B]). The 12247 Elliott Avenue Project is located in El Monte, approximately four miles southeast of the current project, and covered an area several miles distant. The records search indicates that no fossil localities were identified within the current project boundaries or within a five-mile radius. The closest-known fossil localities are located at the Puente Hills Landfill, about five-and-a-half to six miles southeast of the 8601 Mission Drive Project, consisting of Pleistocene-age marine vertebrates and invertebrates (LACM VP 6350- 6362; LACM IP 16968-16991). The nearest terrestrial Pleistocene locality is identified near Monterey Pass Road, about six miles to the southwest, just southwest of Monterey Park (LACM VP 3363). Other, more distant localities are summarized in the records search in Appendix B. A review of published and unpublished literature was conducted for potential paleontological resources that are known in the vicinity of the project. The sources reviewed, Miller (1971) and Jefferson (1991), did not indicate the presence of any known fossil localities within or nearby the project. V. PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY Overview The degree of paleontological sensitivity of any particular area is based on a number of factors, including the documented presence of fossiliferous resources on a site or in nearby areas, the presence of documented fossils within a particular geologic formation or lithostratigraphic unit, and whether or not the original depositional environment of the sediments is one that might have been conducive to the accumulation of organic remains that might have become fossilized over time. Holocene alluvium is generally considered to be geologically too young to contain significant nonrenewable paleontological resources (i.e., fossils), and is therefore typically assigned a low paleontological sensitivity. Pleistocene (more than 11,700 years old) alluvial and alluvial fan deposits in the Los Angeles Basin, however, often yield important Ice Age terrestrial vertebrate fossils, such as extinct mammoths, mastodons, giant ground sloths, extinct species of horse, bison, and camel, saber-toothed cats, and others (Jefferson 1991). These Pleistocene sediments are accorded a high paleontological resource sensitivity. Professional Standards The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology has drafted guidelines that include four categories of paleontological sensitivity for geologic units (formations) that might be impacted by a proposed project, as listed below: Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 • High Potential: Rock units from which vertebrate or significant invertebrate, plant, or trace fossils have been recovered. • Undetermined Potential: Rock units for which little information is available concerning their paleontological content, geologic age, and depositional environment; further study is needed to determine the potential of the rock unit. • Low Potential: Rock units that are poorly represented by fossil specimens in institutional collections or based on a general scientific consensus that only preserve fossils in rare circumstances. • No Potential: Rock units that have no potential to contain significant paleontological resources, such as high-grade metamorphic rocks and plutonic igneous rocks. Under these criteria, a low potential may be assigned to the surface geology mapped project, based on the lack of significant fossil localities and Pleistocene deposits near the project. Field Survey BFSA staff conducted a pedestrian survey on February 18, 2022 under the direction of Principal Investigator Todd A. Wirths. The project is flat and appeared to be previously graded; remnants of an old asphalt driveway remain. The majority of the ground surface was covered with short grasses and weeds, with several palm trees present. No paleontological resources were identified during the field survey. VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Research has confirmed the existence of Holocene young alluvial fan and valley deposits that are mapped at the surface of the project. Based on the lack of known significant fossil localities nearby and a low sensitivity rating typically assigned to Holocene-aged young alluvial deposits for yielding paleontological resources, it is recommended that paleontological monitoring not be implemented during mass grading and excavation activities, since impacts to potential paleontological resources are considered to be less than significant without mitigation. Monitoring for paleontological resources does not appear warranted at the project. However, should paleontological resources be discovered at any time during earth disturbance activities at the project, a paleontological Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is provided below. Paleontological monitoring may be reduced or increased based on the observations and recommendations of the professional-level project paleontologist. The following MMRP, when implemented, would reduce potential impacts of paleontological resources to a level below significant: Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Paleontological MMRP 1. If paleontological resources (fossils) are discovered, earth disturbance activities should stop, and the fossil location shall be protected and cordoned off at a distance of 50 feet in all directions. A qualified paleontologist should be notified immediately to determine the significance of the discovery. After examination of the fossil(s), and if the paleontologist determines the fossil(s) to be significant, monitoring for paleontological resources may be warranted. The guidelines and procedures for monitoring are detailed below. 2. Monitoring of mass grading and excavation activities in areas identified as likely to contain paleontological resources shall be performed by the paleontological monitor. Monitoring will be conducted in areas of grading or excavation in undisturbed sediments. The duration of monitoring shall be determined by the qualified project paleontologist. 3. Paleontological monitors will be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens in a timely manner. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units are not present in the subsurface, or, if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. The monitor shall notify the project paleontologist, who will then notify the concerned parties of the discovery. 4. Paleontological salvage during trenching and boring activities is typically from the generated spoils and does not delay the trenching or drilling activities. Fossils are collected and placed in cardboard flats or plastic buckets and identified by field number, collector, and date collected. Notes are taken on the map location and stratigraphy of the site, which is photographed before it is vacated, and the fossils are removed to a safe place. On mass grading projects, discovered fossil sites are protected by flagging to prevent them from being overrun by earthmovers (scrapers) before salvage begins. Fossils are collected in a similar manner, with notes and photographs being taken before removing the fossils. Precise location of the site is determined with the use of handheld GPS units. If the site involves remains from a large terrestrial vertebrate, such as large bone(s) or a mammoth tusk, that is/are too large to be easily removed by a single monitor, a fossil recovery crew shall excavate around the find, encase the find within a plaster and burlap jacket, and remove it after the plaster is set. For large fossils, use of the contractor’s construction equipment may be solicited to help remove the jacket to a safe location. 5. Isolated fossils are collected by hand, wrapped in paper, and placed in temporary collecting flats or five-gallon buckets. Notes are taken on the map location and stratigraphy of the site, which is photographed before it is vacated, and the fossils are Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 removed to a safe place. 6. Particularly small invertebrate fossils typically represent multiple specimens of a limited number of organisms, and a scientifically suitable sample can be obtained from one to several five-gallon buckets of fossiliferous sediment. If it is possible to dry screen the sediment in the field, a concentrated sample may consist of one or two buckets of material. For vertebrate fossils, the test is usually the observed presence of small pieces of bones within the sediments. If present, multiple five-gallon buckets of sediment can be collected and returned to a separate facility to wet-screen the sediment. 7. In the laboratory, individual fossils are cleaned of extraneous matrix, any breaks are repaired, and the specimen, if needed, is stabilized by soaking in an archivally approved acrylic hardener (e.g., a solution of acetone and Paraloid B-72). 8. Recovered specimens are prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation (not display), including screen-washing sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. Preparation of individual vertebrate fossils is often more time-consuming than for accumulations of invertebrate fossils. 9. Identification and curation of specimens into a professional, accredited public museum repository with a commitment to archival conservation and permanent retrievable storage (e.g., LACM) shall be conducted. The paleontological program should include a written repository agreement prior to the initiation of mitigation activities. Prior to curation, the lead agency (e.g., the City of Rosemead) will be consulted on the repository/museum to receive the fossil material. 10. A final monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance will be prepared, including lists of all fossils recovered and necessary maps and graphics to accurately record their original location(s). The report, when submitted to, and accepted by, the appropriate lead agency, will signify satisfactory completion of the project program to mitigate impacts to any potential nonrenewable paleontological resources (i.e., fossils) that might have been lost or otherwise adversely affected without such a program in place. Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 VII. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this paleontological report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and have been compiled in accordance with CEQA criteria. March 7, 2022 Todd A. Wirths Date Senior Paleontologist California Professional Geologist No. 7588 VIII. REFERENCES Bell, Alyssa. 2021. Paleontological resources for the 12247 Elliott Avenue Project. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Prepared for Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. City of Rosemead. 2010. City of Rosemead general plan update. Electronic document, https://www.cityofrosemead.org/government/city_departments/community_development/ planning, accessed March 3, 2022. Hillhouse, J.W., Reichard, E.G., and Ponti, D.J. 2002. Probing the Los Angeles Basin – Insights into ground-water resources and earthquake hazards. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 086-02. Electronic document, https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs086-02/fs086-02.pdf, accessed March 3, 3033. Jefferson, G.T. 1991. A catalogue of late Quaternary vertebrates from California: Part two, mammals. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Technical Reports, no. 7:I– v + 1–129. Miller, W.E. 1971. Pleistocene vertebrates of the Los Angeles Basin and vicinity (exclusive of Rancho La Brea). Bulletin of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History; Science (Number 10, 124 pp.). Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2010. Standard procedures for the assessment and mitigation of adverse impacts to paleontological resources; by the SVP Impact Mitigation Guidelines Revision Committee. Electronic document, http://vertpaleo.org/Membership/ Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 Member-Ethics/SVP_Impact_Mitigation_Guidelines.aspx, accessed March 3, 2022. Tan, S.S. 1998a. Geologic map of the El Monte 7.5' quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California: a digital database. California Division of Mines and Geology Open-file report 98-29. Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX A Qualifications of Key Personnel To dd A. W ir ths , MS, PG No. 7588 Senior Paleontologist Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road — Suite A — Phone: (858) 679-8218 — Fax: (858) 679-9896 — E-Mail: twirths@bfsa-ca.com Education Master of Science, Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, California 1995 Bachelor of Arts, Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz 1992 Professional Certifications California Professional Geologist #7588, 2003 Riverside County Approved Paleontologist San Diego County Qualified Paleontologist Orange County Certified Paleontologist OSHA HAZWOPER 40-hour trained; current 8-hour annual refresher Professional Memberships Board member, San Diego Geological Society San Diego Association of Geologists; past President (2012) and Vice President (2011) South Coast Geological Society Southern California Paleontological Society Experience Mr. Wirths has more than a dozen years of professional experience as a senior-level paleontologist throughout southern California. He is also a certified California Professional Geologist. At BFSA, Mr. Wirths conducts on-site paleontological monitoring, trains and supervises junior staff, and performs all research and reporting duties for locations throughout Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, San Diego, and Imperial Counties. Mr. Wirths was formerly a senior project manager conducting environmental investigations and remediation projects for petroleum hydrocarbon- impacted sites across southern California. Selected Recent Reports 2019 Paleontological Assessment for the 10575 Foothill Boulevard Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2019 Paleontological Assessment for the MorningStar Marguerite Project, Mission Viejo, Orange County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2 2019 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Nimitz Crossing Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Voltaire 24, LP. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2019 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the Jack Rabbit Trail Logistics Center Project, City of Beaumont, Riverside County, California. Prepared for JRT BP 1, LLC. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Oceanside Beachfront Resort Project, Oceanside, San California. Prepared for S.D. Malkin Properties. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Nakase Project, Lake Forest, Orange County, San California. Prepared for Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Sunset Crossroads Project, Banning, Riverside County. Prepared for NP Banning Industrial, LLC. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Assessment for the Ortega Plaza Project, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County. Prepared for Empire Design Group. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Resource Record Search Update for the Green River Ranch III Project, Green River Ranch Specific Plan SP00-001, City of Corona, California. Prepared for Western Realco. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Assessment for the Cypress/Slover Industrial Center Project, City of Fontana, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Imperial Landfill Expansion Project (Phase VI, Segment C-2), Imperial County, California. Prepared for Republic Services, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2021 Paleontological Assessment for the Manitou Court Logistics Center Project, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County, California. Prepared for Link Industrial. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2021 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Del Oro (Tract 36852) Project, Menifee, Riverside County. Prepared for D.R. Horton. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2021 Paleontological Assessment for the Alessandro Corporate Center Project (Planning Case PR-2020- 000519), City of Riverside, Riverside County, California. Prepared for OZI Alessandro, LLC. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2021 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Boardwalk Project, La Jolla, City of San Diego. Prepared for Project Management Advisors, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX B Paleontological Records Search Research & Collections e-mail: paleorecords@nhm.org August 18, 2021 Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. Attn: Todd Wirths re: Paleontological resources for the 12247 Elliott Avenue Project Dear Todd: I have conducted a thorough search of our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen data for proposed development at the 12247 Elliott Avenue project area as outlined on the portion of the El Monte USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on August 10, 2021. We do not have any fossil localities that lie directly within the proposed project area, but we do have fossil localities nearby from the same sedimentary deposits that occur in the proposed project area, either at the surface or at depth. The following table shows the closest known localities in the collection of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Locality Number Location Formation Taxa Depth VPLACM6350- 6362; LACM IP 16968-16991 Puente Hills Landfill Fernando Formation; Repetto Member (massive clayey siltstone) Herring (Ganolytes), hake (Merluccius), rattail (Coelorhynchus), lanternfish (Lampanyctus, Diaphus), white shark (Charcharodon carcharias); marine mammals (Cetacea); Invertebrates (unspecified) unknown LACM VP 7701- 7702 Intersection of 26th St and Atlantic Blvd, Bell Gardens Unknown Formation (Pleistocene; silt) Fish (Gasterosteus); Snake (Colubridae), Rodents (Thomomys, Microtus, Reithrodontomys); Rabbit (Sylvilagus) 11 – 30 ft bgs LACM VP 3363 W of Monterey Pass Road in Coyote Pass; E of the Long Beach Freeway & S of the N boundary of Section 32; Monterey Park Unknown Formation (Pleistocene; sand and silt) Horse (Equus) unknown LACM VP 3347 11204 Bluefield; La Habra Formation Horse (Equus) 2 feet bgs Whittier (lacustrine silt with caliche and plant detritus) LACM VP 7508 Near intersection of Vellano Club Dr. and Palmero Dr., Oakcrest Development; N of Serrano Canyon Unknown formation (Pleistocene) Ground sloth (Nothrotheriops); elephant family (Proboscidea); horse (Equus) Unknown LACM VP 1728 W of intersection of English Rd & Peyton Dr, Chino Unknown (light brown shale with interbeds of very coarse brown sand; Pleistocene) Horse (Equus), camel (Camelops) 15-20 ft bgs VP, Vertebrate Paleontology; IP, Invertebrate Paleontology; bgs, below ground surface This records search covers only the records of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (“NHMLA”). It is not intended as a paleontological assessment of the project area for the purposes of CEQA or NEPA. Potentially fossil-bearing units are present in the project area, either at the surface or in the subsurface. As such, NHMLA recommends that a full paleontological assessment of the project area be conducted by a paleontologist meeting Bureau of Land Management or Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. Sincerely, Alyssa Bell, Ph.D. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County enclosure: invoice Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 October 6, 2021 Prepared for: Bornstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 735 East Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project No.: 185805355 Sign-off Sheet and Signatures of Environmental Professionals Project No.: 185805355 This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Bornstein Enterprises (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. All information, conclusions, and recommendations provided by Stantec in this document regarding the Phase I ESA have been prepared under the supervision of and reviewed by the professionals whose signatures appear below. I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in § 312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Property. I have developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Author: Alicia Jansen Associate Scientist Quality Reviewer: Joshua Sargent, MS, PG Associate Geologist Independent Reviewer: Kyle Emerson, PG, CEG Managing Principal Geologist PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Project No.: 185805355 i Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... III 1.0 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1.1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2.1 2.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 2.2 2.2 SPECIAL TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS ..................... 2.2 2.3 EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ................................................................ 2.2 2.4 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS ................................................................................... 2.3 3.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION ................................................................................ 3.1 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW ........................................................................................................ 4.1 4.1 PHYSICAL SETTING ...................................................................................................... 4.1 4.1.1 Property Topography and Surface Water Flow ............................................. 4.1 4.1.2 Regional and Property Geology .................................................................... 4.1 4.1.3 Regional and Property Hydrogeology ........................................................... 4.2 4.2 FEDERAL, STATE AND TRIBAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS ................................ 4.3 4.2.1 Listings for Property ....................................................................................... 4.3 4.2.2 Listings for Nearby Sites with Potential to Impact Property .......................... 4.3 4.3 LOCAL/REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS ...................................................... 4.5 4.3.1 California Department of Geothermal and Energy Management ................. 4.5 4.3.2 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)...................... 4.5 4.3.3 Fire Department ............................................................................................. 4.6 4.3.4 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) ........................................ 4.6 4.3.5 Los Angeles County Department of Public Works ........................................ 4.6 4.3.6 Local Building and/or Planning Department Records ................................... 4.7 4.4 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................. 4.7 4.4.1 Land Title Records/Deeds ............................................................................. 4.7 4.4.2 Aerial Photographs ........................................................................................ 4.7 4.4.3 City Directories ............................................................................................... 4.8 4.4.4 Historical Fire Insurance Maps ...................................................................... 4.8 4.4.5 Historical Topographic Maps ......................................................................... 4.8 4.4.6 Other Historical Sources ................................................................................ 4.9 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE.............................................................................................. 5.1 5.1 SITE RECONNAISSANCE METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 5.1 5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 5.1 5.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS .................................. 5.2 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS .......................................................................................... 5.2 5.5 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ......................................................................................... 5.2 5.6 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS/STRUCTURES .................................................. 5.3 5.7 ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS ............................................................................ 5.3 5.8 ADJOINING PROPERTIES ............................................................................................. 5.3 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Project No.: 185805355 ii 5.8.1 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ............................................................ 5.3 5.8.2 Observed Evidence of Past Uses of Adjoining Properties ............................ 5.3 5.8.3 Pits, Ponds or Lagoons on Adjoining Properties ........................................... 5.4 5.9 OBSERVED PHYSICAL SETTING ................................................................................. 5.4 6.0 EVALUATION .................................................................................................................. 6.1 6.1 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS ............................................................................................ 6.1 6.2 DATA GAPS..................................................................................................................... 6.1 6.3 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 6.2 7.0 NON-SCOPE CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................. 7.1 7.1 LEAD-BASED PAINT ...................................................................................................... 7.1 7.2 ASBESTOS ...................................................................................................................... 7.1 7.3 RADON ............................................................................................................................ 7.1 7.4 FLOOD ZONES ............................................................................................................... 7.2 8.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 8.1 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Property Location Map FIGURE 2 Property Vicinity Map LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY AND VICINITY .............................. A.1 APPENDIX B STANTEC RESUMES ................................................................................... B.1 USER PROVIDED RECORDS ...................................................................... C.1 ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY DATABASE SEARCH REPORT ................. D.1 HISTORICAL RECORDS .............................................................................. E.1 APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Project No.: 185805355 iii Abbreviations AAI All Appropriate Inquiry ACM Asbestos-containing material AST Aboveground Storage Tank ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulation CREC Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions EP Environmental Professional EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Environmental Site Assessment FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency ft msl Feet above mean sea level HREC Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions LBP Lead-based paint LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank NESHAP National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants PAHs Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyls RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act REC Recognized Environmental Conditions SWMU Solid Waste Management Unit TSCA Toxic Substance Control Act USGS United States Geological Survey UST Underground Storage Tank VEC Vapor Encroachment Condition VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Summary October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 1.1 1.0 SUMMARY Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report of the property 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California (the “Property”), on behalf of Bornstein Enterprises (the “Client”). Bornstein Enterprises (the “User”) has been designated the User of this report. The Phase I ESA was conducted in conformance with the requirements of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation E 1527-13, and All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) as defined by the US- EPA in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312, except as may have been modified by the scope of work. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, the ASTM or AAI practice are described in Section 2.3. The Property consists of three parcels of vacant land totaling approximately 3.34 acres addressed as 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California (the “Property”). An asphalt parking lot is located in the southern portion of the Property. Additional patches of asphalt were observed in the central-western portion of the Property. Surrounding property uses consists of residential to the north, east, and south, and vacant land and a plant nursery to the west. A Property location map is illustrated on Figure 1. A Property map illustrating the main features of the Property is provided as Figure 2. Photographs taken during the site reconnaissance visit are provided in Appendix A. We have performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527 of 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California, or the “Property”. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in the Data Gaps section of this report. This assessment has revealed the following evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the Property. •Historical On-Site Agricultural Use. The Property was used for agricultural uses from at least 1928 through the 1950’s. Application of pesticide and herbicide is considered likely to have occurred during this time period, potentially resulting in the accumulation of pesticides and metals common with herbicide application in shallow soils at the Property. Therefore, the former agricultural activity on the Property is considered a REC. Stantec recommends performing a shallow soil investigation on the Property. The preceding summary is intended for informational purposes only. Reading of the full body of this report is recommended. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Introduction October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 2.1 2.0 INTRODUCTION The objective of this Phase I ESA was to perform All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) into the past ownership and uses of the Property consistent with good commercial or customary practice as outlined by the ASTM in “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”, Designation E1527-13. “All Appropriate Inquiry” (AAI) is the process for evaluating a property’s environmental conditions for the purpose of qualifying for landowner liability protections under CERCLA. following final rule of Part 312 of Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 312). The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to identify, to the extent feasible, adverse environmental conditions including recognized environmental conditions (“RECs”) of the Property. The ASTM E1527-13 standard indicates that the purpose of the Phase I ESA is to identify RECs, including historical recognized environmental conditions (“HRECs”), and controlled recognized environmental conditions (“CRECs”) that may exist at a property. The term “recognized environmental conditions” means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: 1.Due to any release to the environment;2.Under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or 3.Under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. ASTM defines a “HREC” as a REC that has occurred in connection with a property but has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority and meets current unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (e.g., property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before calling the past release a HREC, the environmental professional (EP) must determine whether the past release is a REC when the current Phase I ESA is conducted (e.g., if there has been a change in the regulations). If the EP considers the past release to be a REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted, the condition shall be included in the conclusions section of the report as a REC. ASTM defines a “CREC” as a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (e.g., as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), but with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (e.g., property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). As defined by ASTM, RECs can include hazardous substances or petroleum products present under conditions in compliance with laws if that presence represents a material threat of future release. The presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products is, however, not a REC if that presence is a de minimis condition. De minimis conditions are minor occurrences of contamination that generally do not present a material risk to human health and would not likely be subject to enforcement action if brought to the attention of governmental agencies. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Introduction October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 2.2 The scope of work conducted during this Phase I ESA consisted of a visual reconnaissance of the Property, interviews with key individuals, and review of reasonably ascertainable documents. The scope of work did not include an assessment for environmental regulatory compliance of any facility ever operated at the Property (past or present), or sampling and analyzing of environmental media. Stantec was not contracted to perform an independent evaluation of the purchase or lease price of the Property and its relationship to current fair market value. The conclusions presented in this Phase I ESA report are professional opinions based on data described herein. The opinions are subject to the limitations described in Section 2.3. ASTM E1527-13 notes that the availability of record information varies from source to source. The User or Environmental Professional is not obligated to identify, obtain, or review every possible source that might exist with respect to a property. Instead, ASTM identifies record information that is reasonably ascertainable from standard sources. “Reasonably ascertainable” means: 1.Information that is publicly available; 2.Information that is obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints; and 3.Information that is practicably reviewable. 2.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Property consists of three parcels of vacant land totaling approximately 3.34 acres addressed as 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California (the “Property”). Surrounding property uses consists of residential to the north, east, and south, and vacant land and a plant nursery to the west. A Property location map is illustrated on Figure 1. A Property map illustrating the main features of the Property is provided as Figure 2. Photographs taken during the site reconnaissance visit are provided in Appendix A. The Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) associated with the Property are 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. 2.2 SPECIAL TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS There were no special terms, conditions, or significant assumptions associated with this Phase I ESA. 2.3 EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This report documents work that was performed in accordance with the MSA. No other representations, warranties or guarantees are made concerning the accuracy or completeness of the data or conclusions contained within this report. This report provides an evaluation of specified environmental conditions associated with the identified property that was assessed at the time the work was conducted and is based on information obtained by and/or provided to Stantec at that time. 40 CFR 312.20(f)(2) requires that the Environmental Professional evaluate the thoroughness and reliability of provided information. Stantec can neither warrant nor guarantee such thoroughness or reliability, however. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Introduction October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 2.3 Conclusions made within this report consist of Stantec’s professional opinion as of the time of the preparation of this report, and are based solely on the scope of work described in the report, the limited data available and the results of the work. They are not a certification of the property’s environmental condition. Project Specific limiting conditions are provided in Section 2.2. The conclusions are based on the site conditions encountered by Stantec at the time of the work. Accordingly, additional studies and actions may be required. The identification of non-environmental risks to structures or people on the Property is beyond the scope of this assessment. Stantec specifically disclaims any responsibility to update the conclusions in this report if new or different information later becomes available or if the conditions or activities on the property subsequently change. 2.4 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS This Phase I ESA was conducted by, or under the supervision of, an individual that meets the ASTM definition of an Environmental Professional (EP). The credentials of the EP and other key Stantec personnel involved in conducting this Phase I ESA are provided in Appendix B. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT User-Provided Information October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 3.1 3.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION ASTM E1527-13 describes responsibilities of the User to complete certain tasks in connection with the performance of “All Appropriate Inquiries” into the Property. The ASTM standard requires that the Environmental Professional request information from the User on the results of those tasks because that information can assist in the identification of RECs, CRECs, HRECs, or de minimis conditions in connection with the Property. To accomplish that, Stantec requested that the User provide the following documents and information: Description of Information Provided (Yes / No) Description and/or Key Findings User Questionnaire and/or Interview Yes No environmental issues were identified in the user questionnaire completed by Mr. ErikPfahler, Senior Vice Presidenital. Environmental Liens or Activity Use Limitations N/A No environmental liens and/or activity use limitations were identified in the Preliminary Title Report dated June 2, 2021. A copy of the Preliminary Title Report is provided in Appendix C. Previous Environmental Permits or Reports Provided by User No The user reportedly does not possess any of these documents. Purpose of the Phase I ESA Yes Due Diligence PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.1 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW The objective of consulting historical sources of information is to develop the history of the Property and surrounding area and evaluate if past uses may have resulted in RECs. Physical setting records are evaluated to determine if the physical setting may have contributed to adverse environmental conditions in connection with the Property. During the review of historical records, Stantec attempted to identify uses of the Property from the present to the first developed use of the Property. Stantec’s research included the reasonably ascertainable and useful records described in this section. 4.1 PHYSICAL SETTING A summary of the physical setting of the Property is provided in the table below with additional details in the following subsections Topography: The Property is relatively flat at an elevation of approximately 360 feet above mean sea level (amsl) with a general topographic gradient to the south (EDR, 2021). Soil/Bedrock Data: The subsurface in the vicinity of the Property is described as silts, sand/silt mixtures, and poorly graded sand to approximately 60 feet below ground surface (bgs). Estimated Depth to Groundwater/ Estimated Direction of Gradient: Currently, the depth to groundwater ranges from 190 to 365 feet bgs in Property Area. (EPA, 2016) NOTE: Site-specific groundwater flow direction and depth can only be determined by conducting site-specific testing, which Stantec has not conducted. 4.1.1 Property Topography and Surface Water Flow The Property is relatively flat at an elevation of approximately 360 feet above mean sea level (amsl) with a general topographic gradient to the south-southeast (EDR, 2021). Based on the topography, surface water on the Property is expected to infiltrate the ground surface. The Rubio Wash is located approximately 0.38-mile west of the Property. 4.1.2 Regional and Property Geology The Property is located in Los Angeles County. The area is located within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province, which includes northwest-southeast trending mountain ranges and valleys that have been developed by the San Andreas Fault system (California Geological Survey [CGS], 2002). The stratigraphy underlying the vicinity of the Property consists primarily of recent-age alluvium (CDMG, 1965). The geology in the area of the Property consists of unconsolidated alluvium overlying marine sedimentary bedrock. The bedrock sequence with increasing depth consists of the Pico, Puente, and Topanga Formations, and the Santa Monica Slate basement complex. The Property area alluvium primarily consists of relatively fine-grained sediments with less prevalent layers of coarse-grained sediments. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.2 The closest mapped recently active fault is the Rio Hondo Fault located approximately 2 miles southeast (CGS, 2010). According to official maps of California, the Site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo (AP) Earthquake Fault Zone boundary but is within a liquefaction zone (CDMG, 2000). 4.1.3 Regional and Property Hydrogeology The Property is located within the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin. The basin is located within the eastern portion of Los Angeles County and includes most of San Gabriel Valley and part of the Santa Ana Valley. The basin is constrained by bedrock and faults on all sides. Several aquifers are present in the basin and water-bearing units consist of Holocene alluvium up to 4,100 feet in thickness and Pleistocene marine deposits up to 2,000 feet in thickness (Department of Water Resources [DWR], 2004). Three distinct groundwater zones occur in the Property area: shallow, intermediate, and deep. The shallow groundwater zone is the first-encountered groundwater. Each groundwater zone generally dips to the southeast. Although there is considerably variability in the area of the Property, the transition between groundwater zones is typically observed between 200 and 250 feet below ground surface (bgs) for the shallow and intermediate zones, and between 450 and 650 feet bgs for the intermediate and deep zones (EPA, 2009). Currently, the depth to groundwater ranges from 190 to 365 feet bgs in Property Area. (EPA, 2016) The Property is within Area 3 of the San Gabriel Superfund Site. Area 3 is one of 8 Operable Units (OUs) identified by United States Environmental Tprotection Agency (USEPA) for the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Sites and is known as the San Gabriel Valley Area 3 Superfund Site. Covering 19 square miles in the western portion of the San Gabriel Valley, Area 3 is located west of Rosemead Blvd, north of I-10, and south of the Raymond Fault (which separates the main San Gabriel Basin from the Raymond Basin to the northwest). Area 3 includes all of the City of San Gabriel, as well as portions of the Cities of Alhambra, Rosemead, Temple City, San Marino and South Pasadena. Discovery of contamination in water purveyor production wells led USEPA to designate Area 3 as a National Priority List (NPL) site in 1984. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been detected in production wells and safeguards are in place to ensure acceptable drinking water quality. Area 3 groundwater is contaminated with VOCs (most commonly tetrachloroethene [PCE] and trichloroethene [TCE]), perchlorate, and nitrate at concentrations exceeding state and federal water quality standards. The USEPA issued the Remediation Investigation (RI) Report in June 2009. The RI Report indicates that groundwater contamination is present in the western bedrock aquifer, western alluvial aquifer, and eastern alluvial aquifer (shallow, intermediate, and deep zones). The RI Report also indicates that groundwater production in the eastern portion of Area 3 impacts contaminant migration. To identify the sources of the groundwater contamination and determine what additional cleanup is needed, the State of California has directed and overseen investigations of more than 20 current and former industrial facilities. USEPA supplemented these investigations with 10 new ground water monitoring wells and soil testing at four industrial facilities identified as possible sources of groundwater contamination. USEPA is using the data generated by these investigations to identify and evaluate groundwater cleanup options. In 2016, USEPA expects to complete a feasibility study and develop a proposed soil and groundwater cleanup plan. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.3 Groundwater in the western alluvial aquifer flows generally southeastward to eastward following the bedrock structural features, and exhibits steeper horizontal hydraulic gradients than the eastern alluvial aquifer. Finer-grained alluvium restricts groundwater flow. The eastern alluvial aquifer consists of multiple, leaky aquifers, with groundwater flow generally to the west/southwest in the vicinity of the NEOU. The main influences on groundwater flow in the eastern alluvial aquifer include groundwater pumping, the presence of fine-grained units that either allow leakage or obstruct vertical groundwater flow, and limited groundwater recharge. 4.2 FEDERAL, STATE AND TRIBAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS A regulatory agency database search report was obtained from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), a third-party environmental database search firm. A complete copy of the database search report, including the date the report was prepared, the date the information was last updated, and the definition of databases searched, is provided in Appendix D. Stantec evaluated the information listed within the database relative to potential impact to the Property, assessing the potential for impacts based in part on the physical setting. As part of this process, inferences have been made regarding the likely groundwater flow direction at or near the Property. As described in 4.1.3, the inferred shallow groundwater flow direction is likely to be in the south direction. Observations about the Property and surrounding properties made during the Property reconnaissance are provided in more detail in Section 5. 4.2.1 Listings for Property The Property is identified in the hazardous waste tracking system (HWTS) and HAZNET databases for the disposal of asbestos-containing materials in 1989 and 1990, related to the demolition of the church structure formerly located in the southern portion of the Property. Given these materials were properly disposed from the Property, and lack of reported violations, this listings is not considered to pose a REC to the Property.in the environmental database report. 4.2.2 Listings for Nearby Sites with Potential to Impact Property Stantec assessed data presented in the environmental agency database search report to evaluate the potential for conditions on adjacent and nearby sites to pose a REC, CREC, or HREC for the Property. The evaluation included an opinion of the potential for contamination by hazardous substances or petroleum products to migrate to the Property from a nearby property, including by vapor migration or encroachment (i.e., potential for a vapor encroachment condition [VEC]. Based on this evaluation, the following individual facilities were identified as the most likely potential sources of impact to the Property. The basis for why each of the following listed databases creates a REC for the property is also provided. Listed Facility Name/Address Database Listing Distance/Direction from Property REC? (YES / NO) Hytone Cleaners 4521 Dubonnet Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 EDR Hist Claners Approximately 460 feet east No PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.4 Listed Facility Name/Address Database Listing Distance/Direction from Property REC? (YES / NO) The facility is listed as a laundry and dry-cleaning facility in 2013. However, upon review of the listing, it appear the facility is located within a residence. Given the distance of the facility from the Property, depth to groundwater in the area of the Property, and lack of reported chemical uses at this facility, this listing is considered unlikely to represent a REC to the Property. Sakaida Nursery Inc. 8626 East Grand Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 RCRA-SQG, UST, CERS HAZ WASTE, SWEEPS UST, FINDS, ECHO, HAZNET, LOS ANGELES CO HMS, CERS, HWTS Adjacent west. No This facility is listed for the generation of small quantities of hazardous waste, disposal of waste oil and unspecified organic mixture from 1990 through 2002, and the presence of two (2) underground storage tanks (USTs). Information within the database report indicates the USTs may be used for storage of waste oil. Multiple administrative violations are recorded for this facility, including failure to maintain waste manifests and failure to properly label hazardous waste storage containers. The violations were corrected, and returned to compliance shortly after the violations were filed. Given the content of the USTs was waste oil and the estimated depth to groundwater is greater than 50 feet bgs, this listing is considered unlikely to represent a REC to the Property. San Gabriel Valley (Area 3) Main Street & Garfield Avenue Alhambra, California 91801 NPL; SEMS; PRP; Approximately ½ mile northwest No The San Gabriel Valley (Area 1) is a groundwater plume that runs along the axis of the west fork of the Alhambra Creek in the San Gabriel groundwater basin. The plume is approximately 2 miles long and 1 mile wide. The groundwater is contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE). The USEPA is continuing investigation and evaluation to identify groundwater contamination sources. Given the depth to groundwater in the area of the Property, and the mapped Area 3 groundwater plume is not present below the Property, the San Gabriel Valley (Area 3) plume does not represent an environmental concern to the Property and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding this issue. San Gabriel Valley (Area 1) Peck Road & Real El Monte, California 91801 NPL; SEMS; PRP; US ENG CONTROLS; ROD, CONSENT; FINDS, ECHO Approximately ½ mile east-southeast No The San Gabriel Valley (Area 3) is a groundwater plume that runs along the axis of the Rio Hondo Wash and the Salt Pit Wash in the San Gabriel groundwater basin in El Monte, California. The plume is approximately 4 miles long and 1.5 mile wide. The groundwater is contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE), tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and carbon tetrachloride (CTC). The USEPA is continuing investigation and evaluation to identify groundwater contamination sources. Given the depth to groundwater in the area of the Property, and the mapped Area 3 groundwater plume is not present below the Property, the San Gabriel Valley (Area 3) plume does not represent an environmental concern to the Property and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding this PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.5 Listed Facility Name/Address Database Listing Distance/Direction from Property REC? (YES / NO) issue. The remaining listings in the database search report provided in Appendix D do not constitute a REC for the Property. Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding any of those listings. 4.3 LOCAL/REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Stantec checked the following sources to obtain information pertaining to Property use and/or indications of RECs in connection with the Property: 4.3.1 California Department of Geothermal and Energy Management Agency Name Contact Information Finding California Department of Geothermal and Energy Management (CalGEM) 5816 Corporate Avenue, Suite 200 Cypress, CA 90630 Online database: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/ dog/Pages/WellFinder.aspx September 30, 2021 Stantec searched for oil wells on the California Department of Geothermal and Energy Management (CalGEM) online database. There are no oil wells on the Property. The nearest oil well is a plugged dry hole located approximately7,200 feet to the south (American Petroleum Institute number 0403705500). 4.3.2 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) Agency Name, Contact Information Findings California State Water Resources Control Board, Los Angeles (RWQCB) 320 W 4th Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213) 576-6600 September 30, 2021 Stantec researched the online database Geotracker managed by this agency (geotracker.waterbarods.ca.gov). No records were found on the database website for the Property address or adjacent properties. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.6 4.3.3 Fire Department Agency Name Contact Information Finding County of Los Angeles Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division 1320 N. Eastern Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90063 (323) 881-2411 September 30, 2021 Stantec the Property addresses on the County of Los Angeles Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division website. The Property addresses were not identified on the Site Mitigation Inventory database, or the active or inactive facility list. Additionally, Stantec submitted a public records request to this agency on September 30, 2021. At the time of this report no response had been received. Should any pertinent information become available an addendum to this report will be issued. Based on its review of other sources, however, Stantec considers it unlikely that any records from this agency would alter the conclusions or recommendations of this report. 4.3.4 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Agency Name Contact Information Finding Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) 5796 Corporate Ave., Cypress, CA 90630 https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/ September 30, 2021 Stantec researched the online database Envirostor managed by this agency (envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov). No records were found on the database website for the Property address or adjacent properties. 4.3.5 Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Agency Name Contact Information Finding Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW) Environmental Programs Division UST Program 900 South Fremont Avenue, 3rd Floor Alhambra, California Tel: (626) 458-3517 http://ladpw.org/epd/CleanLA/OpenFileRevi ew.aspx September 30, 2021 Stantec researched the online database managed by this agency (http://ladpw.org/epd/CleanLA/OpenFileReview.aspx). No records were found on the database website for the Property. Stantec also research the Solid Waste Management System database managed by this agency (https://dpw.lacounty.gov/epd/swims/OnlineServices/searc h-methane-hazards-esri.aspx) to determine if methane mitigation is required for the Property. According to this database, the Property is not within 300 feet of an oil or gas well or 1,000 feet of a methane producing site. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.7 4.3.6 Local Building and/or Planning Department Records Agency Name, Contact Information Findings Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety Online database: http://ladpw.org/bsd/content/ September 30, 2021 Stantec searched for available documents for the Property on the Department of Public Works online building permit viewer. No records were available. 4.4 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW 4.4.1 Land Title Records/Deeds No environmental liens and/or activity use limitations were identified in the Preliminary Title Report dated June 2, 2021. A copy of the Preliminary Title Report is provided in Appendix C. No additional land title records, deeds, environmental liens, and activity and use limitation documentation were provided by the User. During the course of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Stantec identified no evidence of any environmental liens or activity and use limitations associated with the Property. 4.4.2 Aerial Photographs Stantec reviewed historical aerial photographs provided by EDR. The general type of activity on a property and land use changes can often be discerned from the type and layout of structures visible in the photographs. However, specific elements of a facility's operation usually cannot be discerned from aerial photographs alone. The following table summarizes Stantec’s observations of the reviewed historical aerial photographs. Year Scale Observations, Property and Adjoining Properties 1928 1=500’ The Property appears to be developed with one residential structure in the southeast corner, and the remainder of the Property is vacant, or used for agricultural activities. The surrounding area is developed with a mixture of agricultural operations (row cropping and orchards) and residential uses. 1938, 1948 1=500’ The majority of the Property is utilized for row cropping, and appears associated with the adjoining west agricultural operations. The surrounding area has increased residential and commercial development. 1948, 1952 1=500’ The Property agricultural operations appear to be dormant, evidenced by a lack of foliage present in the northern and southern portions of the Property. 1964, 1977 1979, 1981 1989 1=500’ A large commercial structure is located in the southern portion of the Property. The northern portion of the Property appears vacant. The surrounding area has increased residential and commercial development, and is largely devoid of agricultural operations, with the exception of the adjoining-west property. 1994, 2002 2005, 2009 1=500’ The commercial structure located in the southern portion of the Property has been removed, and the Property is now vacant. A dirt path is located on the PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.8 Year Scale Observations, Property and Adjoining Properties 2012, 2016 Property, traversing south from Mission Drive north to the nearby plant nursery and residences. There also appear to be some soil placement/disturbance in the northern portion of the Property from 2002-2009. Name of aerial photograph source: EDR, 2021 4.4.3 City Directories Stantec retained a third party (EDR) to research available reverse city directories for the Property, in approximately five-year intervals. The following is a summary of Stantec’s review of the city directory listings: Subject/Adjoining Property Year Listed Occupants Property Address: 8601 Mission Drive 1957 to 1985 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Property Address: 8623 Mission Drive 1975 – 1985 Schwebach Frank N (residential) Adjoining West: 8626 Grand Avenue -- Not Listed Adjoining East: Various on Bartlett Avenue 1957 – 2012 Various Residential Name of city directories and source: EDR, 2021 4.4.4 Historical Fire Insurance Maps Fire insurance maps were developed for use by insurance companies to depict facilities, properties, and their uses for many locations throughout the United States. These maps provide information on the history of prior land use and are useful in assessing whether there may be potential environmental contamination on or near the Property. These maps, which have been periodically updated since the late 19th century, often provide valuable insight into historical Property uses. Stantec requested fire insurance maps from EDR; however, no coverage exists for the Property. The Sanborn® Map Search Report indicating “no coverage” is presented in Appendix E. 4.4.5 Historical Topographic Maps Stantec reviewed historical USGS 7.5-minute Topographic Maps of the El Monte, California Quadrangle (scale 1:24,000) to help identify past Property usage and areas of potential environmental concern. Copies of the historical maps are provided in Appendix E. The following table summarizes the maps reviewed and our observations. Year Scale Observations, Property and Adjoining Properties 1894, 1896 1:62,500 No structures or indicators of potential RECs were depicted on the map. A railroad line is located approximately 500 feet north of the Property, and the PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Records Review October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 4.9 Year Scale Observations, Property and Adjoining Properties 1900 city of San Gabriel is depicted to the west of the Property. 1923/1924 1926, 1928 1:24,000 A single small structure is depicted in the extreme southeast corner of the Property. The remaining portions of the Property appear undeveloped/vacant. The surrounding area is sparsely developed. Rubio Wash is located approximately 0.35 miles to the west. 1948 1:24,000 The Property and immediate surrounding area appears similar to the previous map. Considerable development has occurred to the southeast of the Property, within the city of Rosemead. 1953 1:24,000 Most structures have been removed from the map, and replaced by red shading, indicating recent development, which includes the Property. A transmission power line corridor is depicted adjacent west of the Property. 1966, 1972 1981, 1991 1994 1:24,000 The Property is depicted as developed with a church. The surrounding area is similar to the previous map. 2012 1:24,000 No details are depicted on the map. Roads appear is the current configuration. Name of maps and source: EDR, 2021 4.4.6 Other Historical Sources No other historical sources were researched. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Site Reconnaissance October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 5.1 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE A visit to the Property and its vicinity was conducted by Ms. Debbie Hernandez, Staff Geologist with Stantec, on October 4, 2021. Access to the Property was provided by Mr. Erik Pfahler with Borstein Enterprises. Stantec was unaccompanied during the Property visit. Figure 2 provides information about the Property and adjoining properties and the location of potential areas of environmental concern. Photographs collected during the Property visit are included in Appendix A. 5.1 SITE RECONNAISSANCE METHODOLOGY The site reconnaissance focused on observation of current conditions and observable indications of past uses and conditions of the Property that may indicate the presence of RECs. The reconnaissance of the Property was conducted on foot and Stantec utilized the following methodology to observe the Property: • Traverse the outer Property boundary. • Traverse transects across the Property. Weather conditions during the visit to the Property were clear and sunny. There were no weather-related Property access restrictions encountered during the reconnaissance visit. 5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Property and Area Description: The Property is located northeast of the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive in the city of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California. The surrounding area consists of residential properties and a nursery. Property Operations. The Property consists of vacant land. Structures, Roads, Other Improvements: An asphalt parking lot is located in the southern portion of the Property. The rest of the Property consists of vacant land. Additional patches of asphalt were located in the central western portion of the Property. Property Size (acres): 3.34 acres Estimated % of Property Covered by Buildings and/or Pavement: 0% Observed Current Property Use/Operations: The Property consists of vacant land. Observed Evidence of Past Property Use(s): None Sewage Disposal Method (and age): City of Rosemead Potable Water Source: City of Rosemead Electric Utility: Southern California Edison PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Site Reconnaissance October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 5.2 5.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS The following table summarizes Stantec’s observations during the Property reconnaissance. Observations Description/Location Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products as Defined by CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14): None observed. Drums (≥ 5 gallons): None observed. Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors: None detected. Pools of Liquid: None observed. Unidentified Substance Containers: None observed. PCB-Containing Equipment: Pole mounted transformers were observed along the western perimeter. The transformers were observed in good condition without any indication of leaking or staining. Other Observed Evidence of Hazardous Substances or Petroleum Products: None observed. 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS Given there are no structures on the Property, this section of the report is not applicable. 5.5 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS Stantec made the following observations during the site reconnaissance of exterior areas of the Property and/or identified the following information during the interview or records review portions of the assessment: Observations Description On-site Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons: None observed. Stained Soil or Pavement: None observed. Stressed Vegetation: None observed. Waste Streams and Waste Collection Areas: None observed. Solid Waste Disposal: None observed. Potential Areas of Fill Placement: None observed. Wastewater: None observed. Stormwater: Surface water on the Property infiltrates the ground surface or flows overland into the curb and gutter system along Mission Drive. Wells: None observed. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Site Reconnaissance October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 5.3 Observations Description Septic Systems: None observed. Other Exterior Observations: None observed. 5.6 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS/STRUCTURES Existing USTs: No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface patches), which would indicate the presence of USTs, was discovered during the site reconnaissance. Former USTs: No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface patches), reports, or other evidence of the former presence of USTs was discovered during this Phase I ESA. Other Underground Structures: None observed. 5.7 ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS Existing ASTs: No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface stains), which would indicate the presence of ASTs, was discovered during the site reconnaissance. Former ASTs: No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface stains), reports, or other evidence of the former presence of ASTs was discovered during this Phase I ESA. 5.8 ADJOINING PROPERTIES 5.8.1 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties As viewed from the Property and/or from public rights-of-way, Stantec made the following observations about use and activities on adjoining properties: NORTH Residential structures. EAST Residential. SOUTH Mission Drive beyond which is residential and a church. WEST Overhead power lines and a nursery. 5.8.2 Observed Evidence of Past Uses of Adjoining Properties Observations of adjoining properties providing indications of past use and activities, if any, are described below. NORTH None observed. EAST None observed. SOUTH None observed. WEST None observed. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Site Reconnaissance October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 5.4 5.8.3 Pits, Ponds or Lagoons on Adjoining Properties As viewed from the Property and/or from public rights-of-way, Stantec made the following observations about the presence of pits, ponds and lagoons on adjoining properties: NORTH None observed. EAST None observed. SOUTH None observed. WEST None observed. 5.9 OBSERVED PHYSICAL SETTING Topography of the Property and Surrounding Area: The Property and surrounding area are relatively flat. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Evaluation October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 6.1 6.0 EVALUATION This section provides a summary overview of or Findings, Opinions, and Conclusions. 6.1 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS Information gathered from interviews, reviews of existing data, and a Property inspection was evaluated to determine if RECs are present in connection with the Property. Based on this information, Stantec made the following findings and developed the following opinions. • The Property was used for agricultural uses from at least 1928 through the 1950’s. Application of pesticide and herbicide is considered likely to have occurred during this time period, potentially resulting in the accumulation of pesticides and metals common with herbicide application in shallow soils at the Property. Therefore, the former agricultural activity on the Property is considered a REC. Stantec recommends performing a shallow soil investigation on the Property. • An environmental records search was performed and identified sites within their respective ASTM E 1527-13 search radii of the Property that may represent RECs, HRECs, or de minimis conditions. Based on one or more of the following reasons: distance from the Property, position of sites with respect to assumed groundwater flow direction, the native soils, and regulatory status, none of the sites identified in the in the environmental records search report are expected to affect soil or groundwater quality at the Property. The environmental records search identified no RECs, HRECs or de minimis conditions at or near the Property. 6.2 DATA GAPS The federal AAI final rule [40 CFR 312.10(a)] and ASTM E1527-13 identify a “data gap” as the lack or inability to obtain information required by the standards and practices of the rule despite good faith efforts by the EP or the User. Any data gaps resulting from the Phase I ESA described in this report are listed and discussed below. Gap Discussion Deletions or Exceptions from Scope of Work Referenced in Section 1.4: None Weather-Related Restrictions to Site Reconnaissance: None Facility Access Restrictions to Site Reconnaissance: None Other Site Reconnaissance None PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Evaluation October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 6.2 Restrictions: Data Gaps from Environmental Records Review: Land title records, deeds, environmental liens, and activity and use limitation documentation was not provided by the User, and public records were not searched by Stantec. Data Gaps from Historical Records Review: None Data Gaps from Interviews: No on-site interview was conducted during the site reconnaissance. However, given the use of the buildings and historical documents available the lack of an interview is not considered a significant data gap and is unlikely to impact the findings of this report. Other Data Gaps: None 6.3 CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527 of 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California, or the “Property”. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in the Data Gaps section of this report. This assessment has revealed the following evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the Property. • Historical On-Site Agricultural Use. The Property was used for agricultural uses from at least 1928 through the 1950’s. Application of pesticide and herbicide is considered likely to have occurred during this time period, potentially resulting in the accumulation of pesticides and metals common with herbicide application in shallow soils at the Property. Therefore, the former agricultural activity on the Property is considered a REC. Stantec recommends performing a shallow soil investigation on the Property. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Non-Scope Considerations October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 7.1 7.0 NON-SCOPE CONSIDERATIONS The following ASTM E1527-13 non-scope services were performed as part of this Phase I ESA: 7.1 LEAD-BASED PAINT Concern for lead-based paint (LBP) is primarily related to residential structures. The EPA’s Final Rule on Disclosure of Lead-Based Paint in Housing (40 CFR Part 745) defines LBP as paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligram per square centimeter or 0.5 percent by weight. The risk of lead toxicity in LBP varies based upon the condition of the paint and the year of its application. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has identified the following risk factors: • The age of the dwelling as follows: maximum risk is from paint applied before 1950. • There is severe risk from paint applied before 1960. • There is moderate risk from deteriorated paint applied before 1970. • There is slight risk from the paint that is intact but applied before 1977. • The condition of the painted surfaces. • The presence of children and certain types of households in the building. • Previously reported cases of lead poisoning in the building or area. No structures are currently on the Property. 7.2 ASBESTOS Asbestos can be found in many applications, including sprayed-on or blanket-type insulation, pipe wraps, mastics, floor and ceiling tiles, wallboard, mortar, roofing materials, and a variety of other materials commonly used in construction. The greatest asbestos-related human health risks are associated with friable asbestos, which is ACM that can be reduced to powder by hand pressure. Friable asbestos can become airborne and inhaled, which has been associated with specific types of respiratory disease. The manufacturing and use of asbestos in most building products was curtailed during the late 1970s. Stantec makes no warranty as to the possible existence or absence of inaccessible materials or to their evaluation with respect to asbestos content. Samples of suspect ACM should be collected for laboratory analysis of asbestos prior to any renovation or building demolition to be compliant with, EPA National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. No structures are currently on the Property. 7.3 RADON Radon is a colorless, tasteless radioactive gas with an EPA-specified action level of 4.0 PicoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L) for residential properties. Radon gas has a very short half-life of 3.8 days. The health PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Non-Scope Considerations October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 7.2 risk potential of radon is primarily associated with its rate of accumulation within confined areas near or in the ground, such as basements, where vapors can readily transfer to indoor air from the ground through foundation cracks or other pathways. Large, adequately ventilated rooms generally present limited risk for radon exposure. The radon concentrations in buildings and homes depend on many factors, including soil types, temperature, barometric pressure, and building construction (EPA, 1993). Stantec reviewed regional data published by the EPA on average indoor radon concentrations in the vicinity of the Property (http://www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.html). EPA Radon Zones (w/Average Measured Indoor Radon concentrations) Zone 1 – High (>4.0 pCi/L) Zone 2 – Moderate (2 to 4 pCi/L) Zone 3 – Low (<2 pCi/L) Normally-occupied sub grade areas present? (i.e., basement apartments, offices, stores, etc.) None. The Property is located in Zone 2 and is considered to have medium potential for radon. Two of the 11 tests from zip code 91770 (the zip code of the Property) were above 4 pCi/L. To determine Property- specific radon levels, a radon survey would have to be conducted. However, based on the average first floor reading of 0.711 pCi/L for Los Angeles County, radon appears to be unlikely to represent an environmental concern to the Property and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding this issue. 7.4 FLOOD ZONES According to the Physical Setting summary portion of the EDR report, the Property is not located within a 500-year or 100-year flood plain. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT References October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 8.1 8.0 REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials, 2015, Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions, Designation E 2600-15. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2013, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation: E 1527-13. California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOG), 2021, website http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dog/maps ____, California Department of Geothermal and Energy Resources (CalGEM) Well Finder database, 2021, website https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/ Department of Toxic Substances and Control, 2021, website http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ California Geological Survey (CGS), 2002, California Geomorphic Provinces, Note 36. _____, 2010a, Fault Activity Map of California, adjustable scale, http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/FAM/faultactivitymap.html. _____, 2010b, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones of California, http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/ap/ap_maps.htm. Department of Water Resources (DWR), 2004, Groundwater Bulletin 118, updated February 27. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), EDR Radius Map with Geocheck, Inquiry Number 6684447.2s, dated January 2, 2019. _____, Certified Sanborn Map Report, Inquiry Number 6684447.3, dated September 30, 2021. _____, Historical Topographic Map Report, Inquiry Number 6684447.4, dated September 30, 2021. _____, Aerial Photo Decade Package, Inquiry Number 6684447.8, dated September 30, 2021. _____, City Directory Abstract, Inquiry Number 6684447.5, dated September 31, 2021. State Water Resource Control Board’s Geotracker, 2021, website https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1966, El Monte Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, Scale 1 inch = 2,000 feet, photo revised 1994. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Project No.: 185805355 FIGURES ProjectLocation V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2021-10-04 By: dehernandez1 Borstein Enterprises185805355Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770 Property Location Map Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata. Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO,NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community Figure No. Title Project Location Client/Project Property Boundary (At original document size of 8.5x11)1:24,000 ($$¯0 1,200 2,400Feet SUBJECT PROPERTY ProjectLocation V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2021-10-04 By: dehernandez2 Borstein Enterprises185805355Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PROPERTY DETAILS Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata. Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: © 2021 Microsoft Corporation ©2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS Figure No. Title Project Location Client/Project Property Boundary Assessor Parcel (At original document size of 8.5x11)1:1,500 ($$¯0 75 150Feet 8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770 MISSION DRIVEWALNUT GROVE AVENUEVACANT LOT PARK RESIDENTIAL NURSERY RESIDENTIAL CHURCH RESIDENTIAL POLE MOUNTED TRASFORMERSPOLE MOUNTED TRASFORMERS PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Project No.: 185805355 APPENDICES PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Appendix A Photographs of the Property and Vicinity October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 A.1 Appendix A Photographs of the Property and Vicinity Photographic Log Page 1 of 5 Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333 Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California Photograph ID:1 Photo Location: 4703 Walnut Grove Ave Direction: Southwest Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: Guess Park and residential homes located to the west of the Property beyond Walnut Grove Avenue. Photograph ID:2 Photo Location: 4709 Walnut Grove Ave Direction: Northwest Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: Residential homes located to the west of the Property beyond Walnut Grove Avenue. Photographic Log Page 2 of 5 Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333 Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California Photograph ID:3 Photo Location: 8626 Grand Ave Direction: Northeast Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: Sakaida Nursery located to the adjacent northwest of the Property. Photograph ID:4 Photo Location: 8618 Mission Dr Direction: Southwest Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: Church and residential homes located to the south beyond Mission Drive. Photographic Log Page 3 of 5 Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333 Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California Photograph ID:5 Photo Location: 8601 Mission Dr Direction: Northeast Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: View of the asphalt parking lot in the southern portion of the Property facing north-northeast. Photograph ID:6 Photo Location: 8623 Mission Dr Direction: Northeast Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: Residential homes located to the adjacent east. Photographic Log Page 4 of 5 Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333 Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California Photograph ID:7 Photo Location: 8601 Mission Dr Direction: Northwest Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: Electrical transmission lines located to the northwest of the Property within the nursery. A pole mounted transformer lies within the Property boundary. Photograph ID:8 Photo Location: 8601 Mission Dr Direction: Northeast Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: Tree trunks and vacant land beyond which are additional residential homes. A second pole mounted transformer was observed along the eastern Property boundary. Photographic Log Page 5 of 5 Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333 Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California Photograph ID:9 Photo Location: 8601 Mission Dr Direction: Southwest Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: View of the northern portion of the Property facing south-southwest. Photograph ID:10 Photo Location: 8601 Mission Dr Direction: Southwest Survey Date: 10/4/2021 Comments: Additional patches of asphalt located in the central western portion of the Property. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Appendix B Stantec Resumes October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 B.1 Appendix B STANTEC RESUMES * denotes projects completed with other firms Alicia Jansen CAC, LRCIA Environmental Scientist 18 years of experience Alicia is an Associate Scientist with over fifteen years of experience in Phase I and II Environmental Assessments, with strong emphasis in water quality and environmental research. Alicia has managed the preparation of environmental documents, training programs, and environmental compliance during large scale environmental monitoring projects. Alicia’s environmental consulting experience includes performing asbestos and lead-based paint surveys, oversight of contractors during asbestos abatement, hazardous materials surveys, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) in accordance with the practices identified in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E 1527-13 and the Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property, ASTM Designation E 2247-16. EDUCATION BA, Environmental Studies, San Jose State University, San Jose, California, 2004 CERTIFICATIONS & TRAINING Residential Measurement Provider, 108212, National Radon Proficiency Program, Anaheim, California, 2015 REGISTRATIONS Certified Asbestos Consultant #CAC #15-5379, State of California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor #LRC-00005363, California Department of Public Health MEMBERSHIPS Member, Groundwater Resources Association of California PROJECT EXPERIENCE HEALTH, SAFETY & INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Confidential Health Care Company, Asbestos, Lead-Based Paint, and Hazardous Materials Survey | Northern California | Staff Alicia assisted with site inspections for asbestos, lead-based paint, and hazardous materials at multiple occupied hospitals and office spaces. The scope of work involved sample collection for asbestos and lead-based paint in addition to the quantification of universal wastes (PCBs, mercury containing equipment, refrigerants, etc.) that would require special handling and disposal. She assisted with the preparation of reports summarizing findings. State of California General Services, Asbestos, Lead-Based Paint, and Hazardous Materials Survey | Northern California | 2009 | Technical Support Alicia assisted with site inspections for asbestos, lead-based paint, and hazardous materials at multiple communication towers in remote areas. The scope of work involved sample collection for asbestos and lead-based paint in addition to the quantification of universal wastes (PCBs, mercury containing equipment, refrigerants, etc.) that would require special handling and disposal. She assisted with the preparation of reports summarizing findings. Role: Technical Support | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 10/2009-10/2009 Indoor Air Quality Assessments* | San Jose, California | 2002-2005 | Staff Alicia performed site inspections, interviews, and collected air samples to be analyzed for various air pollutants and molds including formaldehyde, penicillium, aspergillus, cladosporium, and stachybotry. She prepared reports summarizing findings and made recommendations. Veteran's Administration of Puget Sound, Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey | Seattle, Washington | 2009 | Project Scientist Alicia served as the Project Scientist responsible for hazardous building material assessments, specifically asbestos and lead-based paint. These services were required as part of the pre-design tasks for this project. Over 300 samples were collected over the span of four days culminating in a final hazardous building materials report to be incorporated into the facility design as well as demolition activities once the construction phase of the project commences. Interim Remedial Action, Indoor Air Sampling, and Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling | Sunnyvale, California | 2004–2014 | Task Manager and Field Support Alicia conducted an indoor air sampling survey using air sampling pumps, dosimeter badges, and flame ionization detector (FID) during a sump excavation. She performs semi-annual sub-slab soil vapor sampling and indoor air quality surveys using summa canisters. She assists with the preparation and submittal of reports summarizing the findings and provides recommendations to the local regulatory agency. Role: Indoor Air Sampling Survey | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 09/2004-09/2014 * denotes projects completed with other firms Lead Dust Assessment and Abatement Oversight | Fremont, California | 2009 | Technical Support Alicia assisted with the evaluation of lead dust in an industrial facility. A total of 307 dust wipe samples were collected in order to evaluate the potential presence of lead dust throughout the two-story, 500,000 square foot manufacturing building. Role: Technical Support | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 01/2009-03/2009 Former Tesoro Coke Facility, Asbestos, Lead-Based Paint Survey | Pittsburg, California | Technical Support Alicia assisted with an asbestos and lead paint survey of 20 structures at the facility ultimately scheduled for demolition. More than 200 samples were collected over the span of two days. She prepared a report for demolition while also providing the information needed for worker safety during demolition activities at the facility. Role: Technical Support | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 04/2009-04/2009 State of California General Services, Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey | Southern California | 2014-2019 | Certified Asbestos Consultant Alicia conducted with site inspections for asbestos and lead-based paint at multiple bridges, maintenance stations, and roadways throughout Southern California. The scope of work involved sample collection for asbestos and lead-based paint that would require special handling and disposal. She assisted with the review and approval of reports summarizing findings. Role: Certified Asbestos Consultant | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 9/2014-10/2019 PERMITTING, COMPLIANCE, AUDITING Tesoro Refinery, Initial Study* | Benicia, California | 2005 | Staff Alicia assisted with the background research and preparation of applicant-prepared initial study for the upgrade of a refinery. Transmission Line Upgrade* | San Mateo to San Francisco, California | 2005 | Environmental Research and Compliance Staff Alicia supported the environmental compliance program for the construction of a 27-mile 230 kV underground and overhead transmission line. She assisted with the preparation and submittal of variance requests, extra work space requests, and daily and weekly reports for submittal to the California Public Utilities Commission. She also conducted research and assisted with training and report preparation. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS & ASSESSMENTS California Department of Transportation Portfolio | Multiple Sites, Northern California and Southern California, California | 2008-2019 | Task Lead Manager Alicia prepared quarterly groundwater monitoring reports, subsurface investigation reports, sensitive receptor surveys, and preferential pathway studies for various California Department of Transportation locations throughout Northern California. She assisted with the utility locating, work plan preparation, field coordination, archived data onto the State Water Resource Control Board’s (RWQCB) Geotracker electronic filing system. Alicia currently conducts site inspections for asbestos, lead-based paint, and hazardous materials for bridges, salt barns, and maintenance buildings associated with California Department of Transportation locations throughout Southern California. The scope of work involves sample collection for asbestos and lead-based paint that would require special handling and disposal. She assists with the preparation of reports summarizing findings. Role: Task Lead Manager | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 06/2008-02/2019 Soil Gas Sampling and Human Health Risk Assessment | San Jose, California | 2014 | Project Lead Alicia performed a soil vapor survey in conformance with the DTSC Advisory Active Soil Gas Investigations, using soil vapor sampling devices and a mobile laboratory for onsite chemical analysis. She also assisted with the report preparation summarizing the findings and providing recommendations for further assessment. Confidential Client, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments | Multiple Sites, California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Virginia | Task Manager Alicia performs Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for multiple confidential clients in accordance with the practices identified in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E 1527-13 and Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property, ASTM Designation E 2247-16 to achieve compliance with requirements of the “All Appropriate Inquiries” rule required to obtain protection from liability under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Cleanup and Liability Act (CERCLA). Previous sites include large industrial warehouses, multi-tenant commercial buildings, large lots of vacant land, and residential properties. She reviews topographic maps, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, and files at local regulatory agencies. She interviews present and former property owners and performed site and adjacent property reconnaissance. She prepares reports summarizing the findings and provides recommendations for further assessment if applicable. Cost: 3-8000 per report Goodyear Portfolio | Northern California and Hawaii | 2005–present | Project Lead Alicia performed Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) and Phase II Site Assessments for various Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company locations throughout California and Hawaii. She assisted with the installation of monitoring wells and exploratory borings; underground storage tank removals; site restoration; product removal with passive recovery system; archived data onto the State Water Resource Control Board’s Geotracker electronic filing system; and assisted with the preparation of quarterly groundwater monitoring reports, sensitive receptor surveys, site conceptual models, and subsurface investigation reports. Approximately 250 Sites • Cost: $8,000 per site. Deborah J Hernandez Geologic Staff * denotes projects completed with other firms Debbie is a staff geologist hired in September of 2018 at the San Bernardino Office. Through her education at Cal Poly Pomona, Debbie has extensive research and writing experience while conducting thesis work. Field experience ranges from field mapping, rock and soil classification to vast experience utilizing geophysical equipment. Since starting at Stantec, Debbie has applied her knowledge towards Phase I and II Environmental Assessment field work and report preparation. Debbie has also overseen soil vapor extraction projects Debbie completed a GIS certification program through the California University Fullerton and is experienced in ArcGIS 10, Adobe Suite, and the Microsoft Office Suite. Debbie's environmental consulting experience includes performing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments in accordance with the practices identified in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E 1527-13, and the collection, and interpretation of Phase II Environmental Assessment data. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geological Sciences, California Polytechnica University, Pomona, Pomona, CA, 2015 CERTIFICATIONS & TRAINING Geographic Information Systems, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, California, 2018 Lead Sampling Technician, National Association of Training and Environmental Consulting, Anaheim, California, 2019 8-Hour Supervisor Trainer Coarse Certification Hazwoper, OSHA, Simi Valley, California, 2018 Adult and Pediatric First Aid/CPR/AED, American Red Cross, San Bernardino, Ca, 2018 Asbestos Building Inspector Initial Course, National Association of Training and Environmental Consulting, Anaheim, California, 2018 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Soil Vapor Intrusion Assessment/Mitigation Studies (including Methane) Soil Vapor Intrusion Assessment, Various Locations, California Debbie performed field oversight during the installation of multiple soil vapor monitoring wells. She assisted with health and safety oversight, classified the soils during drilling activities and assisted with the well installation and subsequent soil vapor sampling. Groundwater Supply / Wells Humboldt Energy, Water Supply Assessment Debbie coauthored a water supply assessment report for a wind energy project located in Humboldt County, California. Through research of groundwater basins and geographic information system analysis, she finalized a report used to supplement the design and construction of over 60 wind turbines and ancillary facilities. Deborah J Hernandez Geologic Staff * denotes projects completed with other firms Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessments Environmental Site Assessment, San Bernardino, Ca Debbie performed an onsite reconnaissance survey, historical records investigation, and formulated the report deliverable. The report provided a thorough review of the property history and defined present environmental concerns for the client. Aerial Mapping Mars Data Analyst, JPL*, Pasadena, Ca (Geology Intern) Duties included mapping geologic safety hazards using HiRISE, CTX and THEMIS images on ArcGIS; analyzed rock classification and distributions to downselect eight landing sites to four. Characterized over 300 craters and their respective ejecta blankets for potential landing sites. Presented findings at the 2014 Geological Society of America Conference, Abstract #249384 Joshua Sargent, PG Project Geologist * denotes projects completed with other firms Joshua is a project geologist with a master’s degree in geological sciences. He has extensive field experience in geophysical exploration techniques and Phase I and II Environmental Assessment field work and report preparation. His field experience includes subsurface gold-copper porphyry deposit mapping using induced polarization and resistivity geophysics, mapping of shallow faults throughout Southern California using refraction seismology equipment, soil logging and collection, soil vapor collection, and surface and groundwater collection with basic flow measurements and parameter stabilization. He is skilled in using ArcGIS 10, Adobe Suite, and the Microsoft Office Suite. Joshua’s environmental consulting experience includes performing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments in accordance with the practices identified in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E 1527-13, and the collection, and interpretation of Phase II Environmental Assessment data. Joshua also has experience in preparing Phase II Environmental Assessment reports based from this compiled data. EDUCATION MS, Geological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, Pomona, California, 2014 BS, Geological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, Pomona, California, 2012 CERTIFICATIONS & TRAINING 8-Hour Supervisor Trainer Course Certification Hazwoper Standard, OSHA, Redlands, California, 2015 8-Hour Refresher Course Hazwoper Standard (29 CFR 1910.120), OSHA, Redlands, California, 2015 First Aid and CPR Certification, American Safety, Redlands, California, 2015 40-Hour Hazwoper, OSHA, Signal Hill, California, 2012 REGISTRATIONS Professional Geologist #9730, State of California MEMBERSHIPS Member, Geological Society of America PROJECT EXPERIENCE Health and Safety Management Health and Safety Subcontractor Oversight Services (Geological Staff) Joshua has provided subcontractor oversight for field activities including soil, soil vapor, and groundwater sampling. Other field activities include well destruction and on-site remediation. Technical Writing Various Technical Writing Projects (Geological Staff) Joshua prepares Health and Safety plans, written permit applications, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments reports, Work Plans dealing with soil, soil vapor, and groundwater sampling, and groundwater monitoring reports. Joshua Sargent Geologic Staff * denotes projects completed with other firms Environmental Site Assessments Phase I Site Assessment, Redlands, California (Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Author) Joshua performed an on-site reconnaissance survey, historical records investigation, and formulated the report deliverable. The report provided a thorough review of the property history and defined present environmental concerns for the client. Soil Sampling Dust and Pesticide Monitoring, Soil Sampling, Monterey Park, California (Oversight, Dust and Pesticide Monitoring, Soil Sampling) Joshua performed field oversight during contaminated soil removal at a future residential community. Dust and toxaphene were monitored simultaneously to generate a site-specific threshold for dust concentration. Routine dust monitoring was performed once the threshold was determined. Property gridding and soil sampling were performed to determine contamination. Soil Vapor Intrusion Assessment Soil Vapor Monitoring Well Installation, Various Locations, California (Field Oversight, Soil Description) Joshua performed field oversight during the installation of multiple soil vapor monitoring wells. He assisted with health and safety oversight, described the soil during drilling, activities, assisted with the well installation, and conducted the subsequent soil vapor sampling. Environmental Site Remediation Subcontractor Oversight Services and Confirmation Soil Sampling (Geological Staff) Joshua has provided subcontractor oversight for remedial excavation of pesticide- and petroleum- impacted soil, and later conducted confirmation sampling to ensure all impacted material had been removed from the Site. Soil Vapor Remediation, Orange County, California (Geological Staff) Joshua has provided monthly operation and maintenance on a soil vapor extraction system operating at a historical landfill. Components of the operation and maintenance included measurements of the recovered vapor for methane and volatile organic compounds, and collecting flow measurements from the extraction wells. Joshua prepared month operation and maintenance reports. Joshua Sargent Geologic Staff PUBLICATIONS Sources of Fluids in Shallow Groundwater Near Natural Gas Extraction – Weld, Adams, and Boulder Counties, Colorado. Geological Society of America Poster Presentation, Poster # 344-6, Session # 344, Geological Society of America 125th Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 2013. Sources of Fluids and Salinity in Shallow Groundwater Near Natural Gas Extraction: Weld, Adams, and Boulder Counties, Colorado. Geological Sciences Department for California Polytechnic State University Pomona, 2014. Sources of Biogenic Methane in Shallow Aquifers, Denver Julesburg Basin, Colorado. Applied Geochemistry, 2015. Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG Managing Principal Geologist * denotes projects completed with other firms Kyle has more than 28 years of professional experience—17 of those years with Stantec—providing geotechnical and environmental consulting. During the course of his experience, he has been involved with a wide variety of geological and engineering projects. He has been in direct charge of quality control/quality assurance (QA/QC) work for Stantec and previous firms for geological, engineering geological, and environmental services primarily in California. Additionally, Kyle has been a primary contact for Stantec with many different clients (including multi-party actions) and regulatory bodies involving contracting, workplan approvals, site assessments and closures, permitting, remedial action, and litigation support. With regard to litigation services, Kyle has extensive experience providing expert witness testimony, second-party review, and litigation support and analysis. Kyle's extensive experience includes assessment and remediation of property-specific and regional issues involving soil and groundwater contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, heavy metals, pesticides, and PCBs. He currently serves as the managing principal geologist in Stantec's Redlands, California office. EDUCATION Engineering Geology/Hydrogeology, California State University, Los Angeles, California, 1984 AS, General Science, Crafton Hills College, Yucaipa, California, 1975 BS, Geological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, California, 1982 REGISTRATIONS Certified Engineering Geologist #1271, State of California Issued 1985, Expires 2011 Professional Geologist #4066, State of California Issued 1985, Expires 2011 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Bioremediation Excavation and Treatment of Petroleum- Contaminated Soil Kyle designed the excavation and treatment of 45,000 cubic yards of petroleum-contaminated soil. Soil treatment included utilizing vapor extraction, combined with bioremediation. Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG Managing Principal Geologist * denotes projects completed with other firms Chemicals & Polymers Two Former Chemical Plants, Environmental Site Assessments and Remediation, Vernon, California Mr. Emerson was part of the team for conducting Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) and developing remedial action plans for two former chemical plant sites with 80-year industrial histories. Phase I ESAs used historical files, maps, aerial photographs, available documents, and data from public agencies and historical directories for identifying recognized environmental concerns. Extensive Phase II ESA survey activities aided in identifying below-grade structures such as vaults/USTs, as well as assessing the extent of influence and nature of the contamination. These investigations confirmed the presence of heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, radioactive materials, semi-volatile organic compounds, and polycyclic aromatic compounds in the soils for these sites. Specific areas of concern included former settling ponds, a bone yard, maintenance areas, transformer and substations, wastewater treatment facilities, and above-ground storage tank farms. A conceptual mode was developed for use in a health risk assessment and developed risk-based corrective actions to address potential health and environmental concerns. He assisted with the development and implementation of a remedial action plan, combined administrative controls, engineering controls, and active remediation; this resulted in the cost-effective return of one site to active use, and is reducing health risks to occupants and the public at the second site. CONFIDENTIAL: Aerospace Adhesives and Coatings Plant, Glendale, California Mr. Emerson was part of the team that conducted feasibility studies to evaluate remedial alternatives for remediation of chlorinated VOCs, 1,4 dioxane, and hexavalent chromium (CrVI) in soil, soil vapor, and groundwater. Feasibility studies included groundwater pump testing, benchscale column testing to evaluate in situ alternatives for reducing CrVI to the less mobile CrIII valence state, soil vapor extraction, capping, and excavation. Field pilot studies were performed to evaluate the efficiency of various CrVI reductants including the use of ferrous sulfate, calcium polysulfide, emulsified oil, and fructose. Extensive multi-depth soil vapor testing was conducted to evaluate the distribution of VOCs in the subsurface and to support vapor intrusion risk assessment. Feasibility studies were completed in 2008. Remedial actions are expected to be completed in 2011. Condition Assessments Assessment and Mitigation of Manufacturing Facility Kyle managed the assessment and mitigation of an ammunition manufacturing facility covering 1,100 acres in a complex geologic environment. The contaminates involved red and white phosphorous, TNT, chlorinated solvents, solid wastes, and live ordinance. Soil Contamination Assessment Supervision and Management Kyle managed and supervised soil contamination assessment and in-situ remediation of heavy metals involving chromium, cadmium, nickel and zinc by chemical fixation to depths in excess of 40 feet below ground surface beneath existing structures within several manufacturing facilities. Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG Managing Principal Geologist * denotes projects completed with other firms Litigation Support and Expert Testimony Kyle provided litigation support and expert testimony on more than 20 separate projects involving service stations, chlorinated solvent cases, heavy metal, and semi-volatile releases. Corporate / Office Commercial Developer - Environmental Remediation of Former Dry Cleaners, El Centro, California Mr. Emerson was responsible for assessments and remediation at this former dry cleaners which released the dry cleaning chemical tetrachloroethene (PCE) to the ground and underlying groundwater. The work included initial site assessment, agency interaction and negotiations with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB), and Colorado Basin Region human health risk assessment (HHRA), design and implementation of remedial investigations, feasibility studies, remedial action plans, and implementation of remediation in mitigating chlorinated solvent contamination in vadose and saturated zones at concentrations indicative of DNAPL. The results of the completed remediation, as well as continued confirmation sampling and monitoring, allowed the CRWQCB to issue site closure in 2008. The site has since been redeveloped into a new commercial development. Environmental Assessments Siting Studies Kyle performed initial siting studies for potential Class I, II, and III landfills. The project included detailed geologic mapping, hydrogeological studies, and permeability studies of caps and liners. Environmental Site Remediation Assessment and Remedial Design, California (Project Supervisor) Kyle supervised the assessment and remedial design of a system to eliminate salt brine contamination in shallow perched water horizons in the Yucaipa, San Bernardino, and Riverside areas of southern California. Design and Installation of Recovery Systems* Kyle designed and installed numerous free- product recovery systems that successfully recovered product. One of the sites contained product up to 11-feet thick covering more than three city blocks. The dissolved phase had affected a multi-aquifer system and a public drinking water system. Geophysical Characterizations* Kyle performed and supervised numerous geophysical characterizations to determine the extent of old landfills. He provided classification studies, landfill gas monitoring, removal verification during grading, methane collection and mitigation plans, permitting, and closure plans. Domestic Landfill Development* Kyle designed and supervised the dynamic consolidation of a domestic landfill for development. He used this process to minimize expected settlement to overlying structures. Kyle designed commercial developments on closed landfills that involved complex methane collection and monitoring systems and building settlement controls. Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG Managing Principal Geologist * denotes projects completed with other firms Clay Borrow Site Studies Kyle performed more than 10 separate clay borrow site studies for determining sources of material to cap landfills; ranged from a 20-acre dry lakebed to a 450-acre parcel in complex folded marine sediments. Assessment, Clean Up, and Regulatory Support Management, Santa, Monica (Project Manager) Kyle managed the assessment, clean up, and complex regulatory support of a PRP site in an MTBE case (Charnock subbasin). His work involved more than 20 environmental professionals working full time for two years to complete the assessment and clean up mandated by the regulatory agencies. Hazardous Waste San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, Remediation & Closure of Multiple Source Areas, Industry, California Mr. Emerson performed feasibility studies to evaluate appropriate and relevant remedial alternatives to mitigate constituents of concern in five AOCs contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons, heavy metals, petroleum fuel, and cutting oils. Ultimately, a combination of remedial alternatives was implemented that included large- diameter auger excavation to 45 feet to minimize impacts on facility operations, vapor extraction, vapor intrusion risk assessment, deed restriction, and monitored natural attenuation. At the completion of remedial actions, confirmation soil, soil vapor, and groundwater sampling were conducted and followed with risk assessment to demonstrate that remedial objectives had been achieved. No further action was recently granted by the US EPA and Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. Mixed-Use Port of San Diego Rohr Facility, Chula Vista, California Mr. Emerson assisted in a detailed subsurface assessment of the Rohr facility. The intent of the assessment was to evaluate the 40-acre former aircraft part manufacturing facility for acquisition by the Port of San Diego for redevelopment into a business park and entertainment complex. The assessment identified the presence of soil, soil vapor, and groundwater impacts by petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, heavy metals, PCBs, and semi-volatile organic compounds. He utilized many sampling techniques to assess the limits and concentrations of contaminants in the subsurface. Ultimately, the team was able to develop a cost estimate for potential remedial action cost associated to corrective action to allow redevelopment. Master Planned Commercial/Residential Redevelopment Project, Whittier, California (Project Manager) Kyle oversaw the assessment of 26 contiguous properties that are part of a 21-acre master planned commercial/residential redevelopment project. The properties included industrial facilities, platting lines, fuel USTs, and metal processing plants, among others. The estimated cleanup costs are approximately $2 million. Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG Managing Principal Geologist * denotes projects completed with other firms Multi-Unit / Family Residential Residential Development Assessment, Ventura, California (Project Director) Kyle directed an assessment of a 40-acre former agricultural property proposed for residential development. Pesticides were identified above hazardous waste levels and preliminary remediation goals established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Through corrective grading methods and onsite placement of the pesticide impacted soils, all material were re-used on site without offsite disposal. The over all cost savings for the client was more than $1 million. Total cost was less than $250,000 for all necessary activities. Oil & Gas Oil Field Site Assessments* Kyle performed site assessments at oil field leases involving refineries, bulk storage areas, piping systems and wellhead, and drilling mud pit contamination. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Action, Culver City, California (Project Manager) Kyle served as the project manager representing a major oil company in the assessment, remedial action, and litigation support in a multi-party contamination case affecting a City water supply. The assessment involved more than 250 continuous core borings up to 100 feet, as well as extensive remedial actions. The total cost for all related activities was $22 million. The case is settled and the closure of the site is pending. Project Management Liability and Property Management Consulting Services Kyle is providing liability and property management consulting services to more than 10 medium to large property development firms in the US. His work involves property transaction assessments, contract review, acquisition guideline development, liability management evaluation, insurance acquisition, and strategic planning. Residential Development Environmental Development Management and Review (Project Manager) Kyle manages and reviews environmental development issues for a large residential developer specializing in development of contaminated industrial properties by providing innovative solutions in developing contaminated properties for residential use through risk assessment, engineering, and administrative and property development controls. Site Management and Remediation Design and Implementation of Biodegradation Programs*, California Kyle designed and implemented one of the first in- situ biodegradation programs in California; it involved 50,000 cubic yards of diesel- contaminated soils, and groundwater to depths of 70 feet below ground surface. Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG Managing Principal Geologist * denotes projects completed with other firms Soil and Groundwater Remediation Systems Soil and Groundwater Contamination Assessments and Mitigation*, California (Project Manager) Kyle managed numerous chlorinated solvent soil and groundwater contamination assessments and mitigation programs in southern California. The projects involved releases that impacted soil and groundwater to depth of groundwater more than 700 feet in multi-aquifer systems. One case involved with plume dimensions more than 1 mile from the source affecting residential properties. Soil and Groundwater Assessment and Remediation Programs* Implemented hundreds of soil and groundwater assessment and remediation programs at various service station facilities in Southern and Northern California, and Nevada. Work involved assessment, remedial design, installation, maintenance and monitoring. Closure has been received on a majority of these sites. Assessment and Remediation Management* Kyle managed the assessment and remediation of soil and groundwater manufacturing at dry cleaning facilities contaminated with chlorinated solvents. Warehouse / Light Industrial Glendale Redevelopment Project, Glendale, California (Project Manager) Kyle managed the assessment and remedial actions during the redevelopment of and industrial property. The project involved the demolition of a historic manufacturing facility and a commercial dry cleaner. Each of these facilities were associated with releases of solvents and petroleum hydrocarbons. Remedial actions involved excavation by pattern drilling and off site disposal along with removal of former USTs. The total cost of remediation and assessment was $450,000.00. Compton Redevelopment Project, Compton, California (Project Manager) Kyle is serving as project manager for the assessment and remedial actions for a large redevelopment project. The project involves the redevelopment of a historic manufacturing facility and a former dry cleaner. Each of these facilities were associated with releases of solvents and petroleum hydrocarbons. The industrial facility was also associated with significant volumes of buried waste that required removal and disposal. These wastes also included the chemical referenced above, as well as PCBs and heavy metals. Remediation has included excavation, vapor extraction, and chemical fixation. The total cost of this project has been $2.8 million to date. Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG Managing Principal Geologist PUBLICATIONS In-Situ Bioremediation of an Underground Diesel Fuel Spill: A Case Study. Environmental Management, 1989. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Appendix C User Provided Records October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 C.1 Appendix C USER PROVIDED RECORDS \\dc1\Data\BE Network\Residential\Active Deals\379 - Rosemead - Mission Drive - Mission Villas\Consultant Reports\Phase 1 & II\Phase I ESA User Questionnaire(ep).doc Stantec Consulting Services, Inc PHASE I ESA USER’S QUESTIONNAIRE In order to qualify for protection from land owner liability under CERCLA as an innocent landowner, bona fide prospective purchaser, or contiguous property owner, ASTM standard practice E1527-13 and the federal AAI rule (40 CFR 312) require that the User of the Phase I ESA report provide certain information (if available) to the Environmental Professional completing the assessment. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not complete. Information that is not or cannot be provided to the Environmental Professional may be identified as a “data gap” in the Phase I ESA report. Please answer the following questions as completely as possible. Attach additional pages as needed. Return the completed questionnaire to Stantec along with the executed Authorization For services form. 1. Property Information Property Name: Mission Villas Property Address(es): 8601 Mission Blvd. Rosemead, California 91770 Property Owner Name: Corporation of Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Property Owner Phone #: contact David Knowlton at NIA Capital (Broker for Seller) at 949- 468-2307 for Seller contact information 2. Contact For Site Access Name: David Knowlton Company/Organization/Title: Broker for Seller Phone # 949-468-2307 E-Mail Address: dknowlton@niacapital.com 3. Environmental Cleanup Liens. Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law? __________ Yes _____X_____ No If yes, describe or attach details of the lien 4. Activity and Land Use Limitations. Are you aware of any activity and use limitations, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded as applicable to the property as a result of environmental contamination, investigation, cleanup, or related matters? __________ Yes _____X____ No If yes, describe or attach details of the limitations 5. Specialized Knowledge or Experience. As the User of this ESA, do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property, such that you would have specialized knowledge about chemicals and processes used by this type of business? __________ Yes _____X____ No If yes, describe or attach details of your specialized knowledge or experience 6. Relationship of Purchase Price to Fair Market Value of Property. Does the purchase price being paid for the property reasonably reflect the fair market value? __X____Yes No Not applicable. User is not involved in a purchase of the property. If you conclude that there is a difference, do you have any reason to believe that the reduced purchase price may be related to contamination known or believed to be present at the property? Yes, I have reason to believe that the purchase price for the property has been reduced in comparison with the fair market value due to contamination known or believed to be present at the property. No, I have no reason to believe that the purchase price for the property has been reduced in comparison with the fair market value due to contamination known or believed to be present at the property. 7. Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information. Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the Environmental Professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products? For example: Do you know the past uses of the property? Yes (describe) ____X____No Do you know of chemicals, hazardous substances or petroleum products that are present or once were present at the property? Yes (describe) ____X____No Do you know of spills or other releases of chemicals, hazardous substances or petroleum products that have taken place at the property? Yes (describe) ____X____No Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? Yes (describe) ____X____No 8. The Degree of Obviousness of Contamination. E1527-13 and the federal AAI rule (40 CFR 312.31) require that the Phase I ESA consider the degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation. Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious indictors that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? Yes (describe) ____X____No 9. Availability of Previous Environmental Reports. Are you aware of previous environmental site assessment reports, other environmental reports, documents, correspondence, etc. concerning the property and its environmental condition? Yes (describe) _____X____No Signature: Name (printed): Title: Date: Erik Pfahler Senior Vice President October 5, 2021 CLTA Preliminary Report Form Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) (Rev. 11/06) Page Number: 1 First American Title First American Title Company 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 200 Corona, CA 92879 Erik Pfhaler Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 810 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Customer Reference: Rosemead site Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Title Officer: Heather Pankey Phone: Fax No.: E-Mail: hpankey@firstam.com Buyer: . Property: 8623 Mission Dr &, 8601 Mission Dr Rosemead, CA PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, this company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Exhibit A. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Please be advised that any provision contained in this document, or in a document that is attached, linked or referenced in this document, that under applicable law illegally discriminates against a class of individuals based Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 2 First American Title upon personal characteristics such as race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, familial status, disability, national origin, or any other legally protected class, is illegal and unenforceable by law. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 3 First American Title Dated as of June 02, 2021 at 7:30 A.M. The form of Policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: To Be Determined A specific request should be made if another form or additional coverage is desired. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LATTER DAY SAINTS, A UTAH CORPORATION SOLE, AS TO PARCEL 1; CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, A UTAH CORPORATION SOLE, AS TO PARCEL 2; AND CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, AS TO PARCEL 3 The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: A fee. The Land referred to herein is described as follows: (See attached Legal Description) At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: 1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2021-2022, a lien not yet due or payable. 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 3. All water developed thereon in excess of that which can be reasonably used for irrigation and domestic use thereon, as reserved in Deed from San Marino Land Company, recorded in Book 4179 Page 217 of Deeds. 4. An easement for Water mains and connections and incidental purposes, recorded in Book 4179 of Deeds, Page 217. In Favor of: San Marino Land Company Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 4 First American Title Affects: As described therein The location of the easement cannot be determined from record information. 5. Covenants, conditions and restrictions in the document recorded in Book 4179 of Deeds, Page 217, but deleting any covenant, condition, or restriction, if any, indicating a preference, limitation, or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, veteran or military status, genetic information, national origin, source of income as defined in subdivision (p) of Section 12955, or ancestry, to the extent that such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate applicable state or federal laws. Lawful restrictions under state and federal law on the age of occupants in senior housing or housing for older persons shall not be construed as restrictions based on familial status. 6. An easement for Laying of and maintenance of water pipe and incidental purposes, recorded November 05, 1936 as Book 14446, Page 314 of Official Records. In Favor of: Ellinor M. Timm Affects: As described therein The location of the easement cannot be determined from record information. 7. An easement for An electric line, consisting of poles, necessary guys and anchors, cross-arms, wires and other fixtures and appliances, for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power, telephone and/or other purposes and incidental purposes, recorded March 04, 1960 as Instrument No. 1960-3377 of Official Records. In Favor of: Southern California Edison Company, a corporation, its successors and assigns Affects: As described therein 8. An easement for Public road and highway purposes and incidental purposes, recorded July 30, 1971 as Instrument No. 1971-5248 of Official Records. In Favor of: City of Rosemead Affects: As described therein 9. An easement for Public road and highway purposes and incidental purposes, recorded February 03, 1972 as Instrument No. 1972-3016 of Official Records. In Favor of: City of Rosemead Affects: As described therein 10. Rights of the public in and to that portion of the Land lying within any Road, Street, Alley or Highway. 11. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the Public Records. 12. Rights of parties in possession. Prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance, the Company will require: Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 5 First American Title 13. With respect to CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY-SAINTS, a Utah corporation Sole: a. A certificate of good standing of recent date issued by the Secretary of State of the corporation's state of domicile. b. A certified copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the contemplated transaction and designating which corporate officers shall have the power to execute on behalf of the corporation. c. Other requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the material required herein and other information which the Company may require. Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 6 First American Title INFORMATIONAL NOTES Note: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than the certain dollar amount set forth in any applicable arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. If you desire to review the terms of the policy, including any arbitration clause that may be included, contact the office that issued this Commitment or Report to obtain a sample of the policy jacket for the policy that is to be issued in connection with your transaction. 1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2020-2021. First Installment: $543.68, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Second Installment: $543.68, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Tax Rate Area: 62-08216 A. P. No.: 5389-009-029 Affects: PARCEL 1 2. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2020-2021. First Installment: $669.25, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Second Installment: $669.25, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Tax Rate Area: 62-08216 A. P. No.: 5389-009-030 Affects: PORTION OF PARCEL 2 3. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2020-2021. First Installment: $665.80, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Second Installment: $665.78, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Tax Rate Area: 62-08225 A. P. No.: 5389-009-031 Affects: PORTION OF PARCEL 2 AND PARCEL 3 4. The property covered by this report is vacant land. 5. According to the public records, there has been no conveyance of the land within a period of twenty- four months prior to the date of this report, except as follows: None Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 7 First American Title 6. We find no outstanding voluntary liens of record affecting subject property. Disclosure should be made concerning the existence of any unrecorded lien or other indebtedness which could give rise to any possible security interest in the subject property. The map attached, if any, may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. First American expressly disclaims any liability for loss or damage which may result from reliance on this map except to the extent coverage for such loss or damage is expressly provided by the terms and provisions of the title insurance policy, if any, to which this map is attached. Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 8 First American Title First American Title Company 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 200 Corona, CA 92879 (951)256-5880 Fax - (909)476-2401 WIRE INSTRUCTIONS for First American Title Company, Demand/Draft Sub-Escrow Deposits Riverside County, California First American Trust, FSB 5 First American Way Santa Ana, CA 92707 Banking Services: (877) 600-9473 ABA 122241255 Credit to First American Title Company Account No. 3097840000 Reference Title Order Number 6612503 and Title Officer Heather Pankey Please wire the day before recording. Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 9 First American Title LEGAL DESCRIPTION Real property in the City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL 1: (APN: 5389-009-029) THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY MAP FILED IN BOOK 52 PAGE 27 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL WHICH IS DISTANT NORTH 64° 21' 00" WEST 169.87 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHWEST LINE NORTH 64° 21' 00" WEST 60.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 28° 53' 15" EAST 162.14 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 89° 02' 15" EAST 38.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE WHICH IS SOUTH 89° 02' 15" WEST 86.80 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A DIRECT LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: (APNS: 5389-009-030 AND PORTION 5389-009-031) THAT PORTION OF LOT 12 IN BLOCK 2 OF ROSEMEAD, IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 12 PAGE 194 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, DISTANT THEREON NORTH 64° 21' 00" WEST 229.87 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 28° 53' 15" EAST 162.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 02' 15" EAST, 124.80 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 00° 57' 45" WEST 457.92 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THEODORE SWAN, RECORDED IN BOOK 14446 PAGE 314, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED, NORTH 64° 21' 00" WEST 194.56 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S RIGHT OF WAY, SHOWN AS PARCEL NO. 19 ON LICENSED SURVEYOR'S MAP FILED IN BOOK 30 PAGE 4, RECORD OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 00° 22' 01" EAST 254.20 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NO. 19; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND THE PROLONGATION Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 10 First American Title THEREOF SOUTH 28° 53' 15" WEST, 399.39 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE SOUTH 64° 21' 00" EAST 190.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: (APN: PORTION 5389-009-031) THAT PORTION OF LOT 12 IN BLOCK 2 OF ROSEMEAD, IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 12 PAGE 194 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 0° 35' 49" EAST 254.68 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE NORTH 64° 04' 21" WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, A DISTANCE OF 194.56 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AS SHOWN ON MAP OF RECORDS OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 30 PAGES 1 TO 7, INCLUSIVE OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89° 55' 39" EAST 173.95 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT DISTANT THEREON NORTH 0° 35' 49" EAST 85.23 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0° 35' 49" WEST 85.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 11 First American Title Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 12 First American Title NOTICE Section 12413.1 of the California Insurance Code, effective January 1, 1990, requires that any title insurance company, underwritten title company, or controlled escrow company handling funds in an escrow or sub- escrow capacity, wait a specified number of days after depositing funds, before recording any documents in connection with the transaction or disbursing funds. This statute allows for funds deposited by wire transfer to be disbursed the same day as deposit. In the case of cashier's checks or certified checks, funds may be disbursed the next day after deposit. In order to avoid unnecessary delays of three to seven days, or more, please use wire transfer, cashier's checks, or certified checks whenever possible. Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 13 First American Title EXHIBIT A LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (BY POLICY TYPE) CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY – 1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART I This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public, records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the public records at Date of Policy. Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 14 First American Title CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; and f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws. 8. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence. 9. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19, and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500 $10,000 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000 $25,000 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 19: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000 $25,000 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 21: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500 $5,000 (whichever is less) 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 15 First American Title (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE [Except as provided in Schedule B - Part II,[ t[or T]his policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses, that arise by reason of: [PART I [The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. PART II In addition to the matters set forth in Part I of this Schedule, the Title is subject to the following matters, and the Company insures against loss or damage sustained in the event that they are not subordinate to the lien of the Insured Mortgage:] 2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp) Page Number: 16 First American Title (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses, that arise by reason of: [The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. [Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R's, etc. shown here.] ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (07-26-10) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d), First American Title 14 or 16. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27 or 28); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 26. 6. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to Advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching subsequent to Date of Policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11(b) or 25. 8. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion of it, to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 5 or 6. 9. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 27(b) of this policy. 10. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence. 11. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances. Privacy Notice Effective: October 1, 2019 Notice Last Updated: January 1, 2021 This Privacy Notice describes how First American Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates (together referred to as “First American,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) collect, use, store, and share your information. This Privacy Notice applies to information we receive from you offline only, as well as from third parties, when you interact with us and/or use and access our services and products (“Products”). For more information about our privacy practices, including our online practices, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy/. The practices described in this Privacy Notice are subject to applicable laws in the places in which we operate. What Type Of Information Do We Collect About You? We collect a variety of categories of information about you. To learn more about the categories of information we collect, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy/. How Do We Collect Your Information? We collect your information: (1) directly from you; (2) automatically when you interact with us; and (3) from third parties, including business parties and affiliates. How Do We Use Your Information? We may use your information in a variety of ways, including but not limited to providing the services you have requested, fulfilling your transactions, comply with relevant laws and our policies, and handling a claim. To learn more about how we may use your information, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacy- policy/. How Do We Share Your Information? We do not sell your personal information. We only share your information, including to subsidiaries, affiliates, and to unaffiliated third parties: (1) with your consent; (2) in a business transfer; (3) to service providers; and (4) for legal process and protection. To learn more about how we share your information, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy/. How Do We Store and Protect Your Information? The security of your information is important to us. That is why we take commercially reasonable steps to make sure your information is protected. We use our best efforts to maintain commercially reasonable technical, organizational, and physical safeguards, consistent with applicable law, to protect your information. How Long Do We Keep Your Information? We keep your information for as long as necessary in accordance with the purpose for which it was collected, our business needs, and our legal and regulatory obligations. Your Choices We provide you the ability to exercise certain controls and choices regarding our collection, use, storage, and sharing of your information. You can learn more about your choices by visiting https://www.firstam.com/privacy- policy/. International Jurisdictions: Our Products are offered in the United States of America (US), and are subject to US federal, state, and local law. If you are accessing the Products from another country, please be advised that you may be transferring your information to us in the US, and you consent to that transfer and use of your information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. You also agree to abide by the applicable laws of applicable US federal, state, and local laws concerning your use of the Products, and your agreements with us. We may change this Privacy Notice from time to time. Any and all changes to this Privacy Notice will be reflected on this page, and where appropriate provided in person or by another electronic method. YOUR CONTINUED USE, ACCESS, OR INTERACTION WITH OUR PRODUCTS OR YOUR CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS WITH US AFTER THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU WILL REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THIS PRIVACY NOTICE. Contact Us dataprivacy@firstam.com or toll free at 1-866-718-0097. © 2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. NYSE:FAF Form 10-PRIVACY20 (12-18-20) Page 1 of 2 Privacy Notice (2020 First American Financial Corporation) English For California Residents If you are a California resident, you may have certain rights under California law, including but not limited to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”). All phrases used in this section shall have the same meaning as those phrases are used under California law, including the CCPA. Right to Know. You have a right to request that we disclose the following information to you: (1) the categories of personal information we have collected about or from you; (2) the categories of sources from which the personal information was collected; (3) the business or commercial purpose for such collection and/or disclosure; (4) the categories of third parties with whom we have shared your personal information; and (5) the specific pieces of your personal information we have collected. To submit a verified request for this information, go to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or call toll-free at 1-866-718-0097. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or by calling toll-free at 1-866-718-0097. Right of Deletion. You also have a right to request that we delete the personal information we have collected from and about you. This right is subject to certain exceptions available under the CCPA and other applicable law. To submit a verified request for deletion, go to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or call toll-free at 1-866-718-0097. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or by calling toll-free at 1-866-718- 0097. Verification Process. For either a request to know or delete, we will verify your identity before responding to your request. To verify your identity, we will generally match the identifying information provided in your request with the information we have on file about you. Depending on the sensitivity of the information requested, we may also utilize more stringent verification methods to verify your identity, including but not limited to requesting additional information from you and/or requiring you to sign a declaration under penalty of perjury. Notice of Sale. We do not sell California resident information, nor have we sold California resident information in the past 12 months. We have no actual knowledge of selling the information of minors under the age of 16. Right of Non-Discrimination. You have a right to exercise your rights under California law, including under the CCPA, without suffering discrimination. Accordingly, First American will not discriminate against you in any way if you choose to exercise your rights under the CCPA. Notice of Collection. To learn more about the categories of personal information we have collected about California residents over the last 12 months, please see “What Information Do We Collect About You” in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy. To learn about the sources from which we have collected that information, the business and commercial purpose for its collection, and the categories of third parties with whom we have shared that information, please see “How Do We Collect Your Information”, “How Do We Use Your Information”, and “How Do We Share Your Information” in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy. Notice of Sale. We have not sold the personal information of California residents in the past 12 months. Notice of Disclosure. To learn more about the categories of personal information we may have disclosed about California residents in the past 12 months, please see “How Do We Use Your Information” and “How Do We Share Your Information” in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy. © 2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. NYSE:FAF Form 10-PRIVACY20 (12-18-20) Page 2 of 2 Privacy Notice (2020 First American Financial Corporation) English Edison Lines PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Appendix D Environmental Agency Database Search Report October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 D.1 Appendix D ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY DATABASE SEARCH REPORT FORM-LBC-SPM ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Inquiry Number: 6684447.2s September 30, 2021 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 9 Orphan Summary 162 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting Source Map A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-9 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC6684447.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 8601 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 COORDINATES 34.0883260 - 34˚ 5’ 17.97’’Latitude (North): 118.0811900 - 118˚ 4’ 52.28’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 400253.4UTM X (Meters): 3772282.2UTM Y (Meters): 358 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5630799 EL MONTE, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140515Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 6684447.2s Page 2 G36 RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY BLVD E LUST, Cortese, CERS Lower 2605, 0.493, South G35 RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY HIST CORTESE Lower 2605, 0.493, South 34 KC CLEANERS 820 EAST MISSION ROA CPS-SLIC, CERS Higher 2596, 0.492, WNW F33 ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD N LUST, SWEEPS UST, Cortese, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS,... Lower 2566, 0.486, SE F32 ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD HIST CORTESE Lower 2566, 0.486, SE E31 ALVAREZ. CHARLES & J 1425 DELTA HIST CORTESE Lower 2505, 0.474, SW E30 ALVAREZ, CHARLES & J 1425 DELTA HIST CORTESE Lower 2505, 0.474, SW D29 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY H 851 E GRAND AVE CPS-SLIC, WIP, CERS Higher 2382, 0.451, WNW 28 CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 927 E. GRAND AVENUE SWF/LF Higher 2327, 0.441, NW D27 911 GRAND, SAN GABRI 911 GRAND WMUDS/SWAT Higher 2301, 0.436, WNW C26 HUY FONG FOODS INC 5045 N EARLE AVE CPS-SLIC, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS Higher 2300, 0.436, NW D25 CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 917 EAST GRAND AVENU SWF/LF, CERS Higher 2234, 0.423, WNW 24 TEXACO 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 2195, 0.416, ESE D23 CITY OF SAN GABRIEL LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE Lower 2146, 0.406, WNW C22 HUY FONG FOODS INC 5001 EARLE AVE CPS-SLIC, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS, HWTS Higher 2122, 0.402, NW 21 C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCH 4619 N ROSEMEAD BLVD CPS-SLIC, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS Lower 2100, 0.398, East 20 GORDON PEST CONTROL 4939 N EARLE AVE CPS-SLIC, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS Higher 1895, 0.359, NW 19 SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY W 8366 GRAND AVE E LUST, Cortese, CERS Higher 1672, 0.317, NW 18 E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE RCRA-SQG, LUST, CPS-SLIC, FINDS, Cortese, EMI,... Higher 1567, 0.297, NNW A17 PACIFIC BELL (E1-625 8633 GRAND SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Higher 1069, 0.202, North A16 PACIFIC BELL 8633 GRAND AVE RCRA-LQG Higher 1069, 0.202, North A15 PACIFIC BELL ROSMCA8 8633 GRAND AVE UST Higher 1069, 0.202, North A14 AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1 8633 E GRAND AVE CERS HAZ WASTE, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS Higher 1069, 0.202, North B13 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE AST, HAZNET, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, CERS, HWTS Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE B12 ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF 8657 GRAND AVE RCRA-SQG Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE B11 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE B10 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE B9 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVENUE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE B8 ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS 8657 GRAND AVE SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE 7 ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION 8533 E. GRAND AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 991, 0.188, NNW 6 PAMELA BROOKS 4809 MUSCATEL AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 919, 0.174, NE A5 PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAI 8633 GRAND AVE CA FID UST Higher 862, 0.163, North A4 SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE RCRA-SQG, UST, CERS HAZ WASTE, SWEEPS UST, FINDS,...Higher 794, 0.150, North 3 HOI KIM LI 4551 MUSCATEL AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 547, 0.104, East 2 HYTONE CLEANERS 4521 DUBONNET AVE EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 462, 0.087, SE Reg SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( PECK RD & REAL NPL, SEMS, US ENG CONTROLS, ROD, PRP, CONSENT,... Same 2787, 0.528, ESE Reg SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( MAIN ST & GAFIELD AV NPL, SEMS, PRP Same 3322, 0.629, NW Reg SAN GABRIEL VALLEY AOCONCERN Same 2815, 0.533, East 1 1X LDS CHURCH 8601 MISSION DRIVE HAZNET, HWTS TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 8601 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 6684447.2s Page 3 39 JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCH 1358/1364 - 1374 EAS ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 4991, 0.945, North 38 GABRIELINO HIGH SCHO 1519 S. SAN GABRIEL ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 3605, 0.683, SW 37 GABRIELINO HIGH SCHO 1305/1311 SOUTH SAN ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 3051, 0.578, WSW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 8601 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 9 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site 1X LDS CHURCH 8601 MISSION DRIVE ROSEMEAD, CA 90032 N/AHAZNET GEPAID: CAC000214393 HWTS DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing ICE ICE LOS ANGELES CO. HMS HMS: Street Number List HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records LA Co. Site Mitigation Site Mitigation List UIC UIC Listing UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System CERS CERS NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: Also known as Superfund, the National Priority List database is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. A review of the NPL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2021 has revealed that there are 2 NPL sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( MAIN ST & GAFIELD AV NW 1/2 - 1 (0.629 mi.) 0 10 Cerclis ID:: 902093 EPA Id: CAD980818579 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( PECK RD & REAL ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.528 mi.) 0 17 Cerclis ID:: 901951 EPA Id: CAD980677355 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/22/2021 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL 8633 GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A16 97 EPA ID:: CAD980891725 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/22/2021 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) A4 54 EPA ID:: CAD982491920 ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B12 82 EPA ID:: CAP000101139 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/23/2021 has revealed that there are 3 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCH 1358/1364 - 1374 EAS N 1/2 - 1 (0.945 mi.) 39 157 Facility Id: 19820032 Status: Certified PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GABRIELINO HIGH SCHO 1305/1311 SOUTH SAN WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.578 mi.) 37 147 Facility Id: 19820017 Status: No Further Action GABRIELINO HIGH SCHO 1519 S. SAN GABRIEL SW 1/2 - 1 (0.683 mi.) 38 152 Facility Id: 60000801 Status: No Further Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Integrated Waste Management Board’s Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database. A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 SWF/LF sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 917 EAST GRAND AVENU WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.) D25 127 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Facility ID: 19-AA-0004 Operational Status: Active Regulation Status: Notification CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 927 E. GRAND AVENUE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) 28 133 Database: LOS ANGELES CO. LF, Date of Government Version: 07/09/2021 Site ID: 174 Status: Active State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 5 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.) 18 101 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: I-03737 Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0603702935 Global ID: T0603702935 SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY W 8366 GRAND AVE E NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.317 mi.) 19 114 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: R-13296 Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0603705187 Global ID: T0603705187 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TEXACO 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) 24 123 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: R-05784 Status: Leak being confirmed Global Id: T0603704697 Global ID: T0603704697 ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD N SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) F33 135 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: R-01935 Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0603704579 Global ID: T0603704579 RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY BLVD E S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) G36 144 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: I-11507 Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0603703806 Global ID: T0603703806 CPS-SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the CPS-SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 7 CPS-SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.) 18 101 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SL603799287 GORDON PEST CONTROL 4939 N EARLE AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.359 mi.) 20 117 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SL603799253 HUY FONG FOODS INC 5001 EARLE AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.402 mi.) C22 121 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Open - Inactive Global Id: SL603799268 HUY FONG FOODS INC 5045 N EARLE AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.436 mi.) C26 130 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SL603799550 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY H 851 E GRAND AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.451 mi.) D29 134 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Open - Inactive Global Id: SL603799257 KC CLEANERS 820 EAST MISSION ROA WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) 34 143 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T10000002256 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCH 4619 N ROSEMEAD BLVD E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.) 21 118 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SL603799546 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) A4 54 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Id: 14099 PACIFIC BELL ROSMCA8 8633 GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A15 97 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Id: 1005 AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B13 85 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: The Waste Management Unit Database System is used for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. The source is the State Water Resources Control Board. A review of the WMUDS/SWAT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2000 has revealed that there is 1 WMUDS/SWAT site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ 911 GRAND, SAN GABRI 911 GRAND WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.436 mi.) D27 132 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites AOCONCERN: San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 A review of the AOCONCERN list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 AOCONCERN site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN GABRIEL VALLEY E 1/2 - 1 (0.533 mi.) 0 10 CERS HAZ WASTE: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. A review of the CERS HAZ WASTE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/19/2021 has revealed that there are 2 CERS HAZ WASTE sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) A4 54 AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1 8633 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A14 94 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 3 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) A4 54 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 14099 ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B8 74 Status: A Comp Number: 1008 PACIFIC BELL (E1-625 8633 GRAND N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A17 99 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 1005 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 2 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B8 74 Facility Id: 00000004976 PACIFIC BELL (E1-625 8633 GRAND N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A17 99 Facility Id: 00000016779 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there is 1 CA FID UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAI 8633 GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.163 mi.) A5 68 Facility Id: 19019407 Status: I Status: A Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/22/2021 has revealed that there are 6 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PAMELA BROOKS 4809 MUSCATEL AVE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.174 mi.) 6 69 EPA ID:: CAC002971799 ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION 8533 E. GRAND AVE NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.188 mi.) 7 71 EPA ID:: CAC002987586 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVENUE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B9 75 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B10 77 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B11 80 EPA ID:: CAC003038381 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HOI KIM LI 4551 MUSCATEL AVE E 0 - 1/8 (0.104 mi.) 3 52 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 EPA ID:: CAC002986733 ROD: Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup. A review of the ROD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2021 has revealed that there is 1 ROD site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( PECK RD & REAL ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.528 mi.) 0 17 EPA ID:: CAD980677355 CONSENT: Major Legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (superfund) sites. Released periodically by U.S. District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. A review of the CONSENT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/30/2021 has revealed that there is 1 CONSENT site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( PECK RD & REAL ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.528 mi.) 0 17 Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/17/2021 has revealed that there are 5 Cortese sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.) 18 101 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY W 8366 GRAND AVE E NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.317 mi.) 19 114 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TEXACO 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) 24 123 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD N SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) F33 135 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY BLVD E S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) G36 144 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 6 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.) 18 101 Reg Id: I-03737 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TEXACO 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) 24 123 Reg Id: R-05784 ALVAREZ, CHARLES & J 1425 DELTA SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) E30 135 Reg Id: 6A189011N04 ALVAREZ. CHARLES & J 1425 DELTA SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) E31 135 Reg Id: 6A189011N05 ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) F32 135 Reg Id: R-01935 RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) G35 144 Reg Id: I-11507 WIP: Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. A review of the WIP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/03/2009 has revealed that there is 1 WIP site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1 8633 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A14 94 Facility Status: Backlog LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health A review of the LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/04/2021 has revealed that there is 1 LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY OF SAN GABRIEL WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.406 mi.) D23 123 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HYTONE CLEANERS 4521 DUBONNET AVE SE 0 - 1/8 (0.087 mi.) 2 51 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 3 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ ROSEMEAD EXTENDION RECYCLED WATER CIWQS ROSEMEAD RETAIL CIWQS WALNUT GROVE AVENUE AND RUSH STREE LDS EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.60 kV4 4 0 40 0 400 4 0 0 4 0 0 3 6 0 3603 6 0 36 032032 0 3203 2 0320 280 280 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 360 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 2 NR 2 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 3 NR 3 0 0 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 2 NR NR 2 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 5 NR NR 5 0 0 0.500LUST TC6684447.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 7 NR NR 7 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250UST 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000AOCONCERN 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250CERS HAZ WASTE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PFAS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 3 NR NR NR 3 0 0.250SWEEPS UST 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250HIST UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CERS TANKS 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS TC6684447.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMCS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 6 NR NR NR 5 1 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 5 NR NR 5 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings TC6684447.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEMI 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPENF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICE 6 NR NR 6 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLOS ANGELES CO. HMS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLA Co. Site Mitigation 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC GEO 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDS 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMILITARY PRIV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCIWQS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNON-CASE INFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPOTHER OIL GAS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSAMPLING POINT 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWELL STIM PROJ 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1HWTS 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMINES MRDS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST 59 0 8 27 20 2 2- Totals -- TC6684447.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC6684447.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation --, 99 --City,State,Zip: Not reportedContact Address 2: --Contact Address: JEFF RAWLAND, ARCHITECT COORD.Contact Name: --, 99 --Owner City,State,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: --Owner Address: LDS CHURCHOwner Name: SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841500000Mailing City,State,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: --Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 10/25/2000Last Act Date: 10/23/1989Create Date: 10/25/2000Inactive Date: CAC000214393EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 900320000City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 8601 MISSION DRIVEAddress: 1X LDS CHURCHName: HWTS: 13.29Tons: D80 - Disposal, Land FillDisposal Method: 151 - Asbestos containing wasteCA Waste Code: AZC000000150TSD EPA ID: CAC000214393Gepaid: 1989Year: 0.025Tons: 03 -Disposal Method: -CA Waste Code: CAD067786749TSD EPA ID: CAC000214393Gepaid: 1990Year: --Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 8014662223Telephone: JEFF RAWLAND, ARCHITECT COORD.Contact: ROSEMEAD, CA 900320000City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 8601 MISSION DRIVEAddress: 1X LDS CHURCHName: HAZNET: Actual: 358 ft. Property ROSEMEAD, CA 90032 Target HWTS8601 MISSION DRIVE N/A 1 HAZNET1X LDS CHURCH S123721033 TC6684447.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above theDescription: AOC: 2815 ft. 1/2-1 East BALDWIN PARK, CA Concern N/A Areas of AOCONCERNSAN GABRIEL VALLEY CCA0000001 The State Department of Health Services and EPA are preparing to initiate a will begin soon to get a snapshot view of the degree of contamination. Status June 1984): A supplemental sampling program of contaminated wells level below 5 ppb are not effective, wells are removed from service. safe for human consumption. When alternative methods of reducing the TCE supplies contain less than 5 parts billion ppb) of TCE, a level considered and public water companies in the area have tested to ensure that their water SNARL) for TCE and PCE. Approximately 100,000 people are affected. Cities public wells in the area exceedthe EPA Suggested No Adverse Response Levels PCE), according to analyses by State agencies and local water companies. Many water is contaminated with trichloroethylene TCE) and perchloroethylene California. The plume is about 2 miles long and 1 mile wide. Ground Creek in the San Gabriel ground water basin in Alhambra, Los Angeles County, ground water plume that runs along the axis of the west fork of the Alhambra Conditions at listing September 1983): San Gabriel Valley Area 3) is a Summary Details: 4Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE)Substance: 79-01-6CAS Number: U228Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: Not reportedScoring: Not reportedPathway: Not reportedSubstance: Not reportedCAS Number: Not reportedSubstance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: NPL: 28.899999999999999Site Score: -118.125Longitude: 34.1Latitude: 1984-05-08 00:00:00Final Date: NFederal: ALHAMBRA, CA 91801City,State,Zip: MAIN ST & GAFIELD AVEAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Name: 902093Site ID: CAD980818579EPA ID: 9EPA Region: NPL: 3322 ft. 1/2-1 NW PRPALHAMBRA, CA 91801 Region SEMSMAIN ST & GAFIELD AVE CAD980818579 NPL NPLSAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)1000114962 TC6684447.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: SEMS Detail: Not reportedNon NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPLNPL: NFF: -118.125000Longitude: +34.100000Latitude: 06037FIPS Code: 27,31Cong District: ALHAMBRA, CA 91801City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: MAIN ST & GAFIELD AVEAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: SEMS: FinalNPL Status: Not reportedDeleted Date: 05/08/1984Final Date: 09/08/1983Proposed Date: NPL: 09/08/83Date Proposed: 05/08/84Date Finalized: Not reportedDate Deleted: NFederal Site: FSite Status: 0902093Site ID: 09EPA Region: NPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)NPL Name: NPL: 10Category Value: Distance To Nearest Population-> 0 And <= 1/4 MileCategory Description: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Category Value: Depth To Aquifer-<= 10 FeetCategory Description: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: NPL: serious problem that required taking immediate remedial action. Gabriel Valley sites,was added to the NPL in May 1984 because it involves a sources of the contamination. This site, along with the three other San management of the problem. EPA continues its investigation to identify extent of contamination and to develop alternatives for treatment and remedial investigation/ feasibility study to determine the aerial and vertical SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962 TC6684447.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/31/2004 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2004-05-31 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: CIAction Name: CRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 2/18/2016 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2009-06-09 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: AIR SRVYAction Name: ASAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: HQual: 9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-09-01 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: PAAction Name: PAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/8/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-09-08 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: PROPOSEDAction Name: NPAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962 TC6684447.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2006-11-01 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: TA GRANTAction Name: TGAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 10/21/2008 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2005-09-26 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: EE/CAAction Name: EEAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2003-03-20 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: ADMIN RECAction Name: ARAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/8/1984 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1984-05-08 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: NPL FINLAction Name: NFAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962 TC6684447.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2SEQ: SIAction Name: SIAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 1984-05-01 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: CIAction Name: CRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 12/27/1991 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1991-12-27 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RV ASSESSAction Name: RSAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-09-01 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: HAZRANKAction Name: HRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962 TC6684447.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2018-04-08 05:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: ST COOPAction Name: MAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 1999-07-12 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RI/FSAction Name: COAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1/24/2020 6:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2020-01-24 06:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: RV ASSESSAction Name: RSAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: HQual: 9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-03-01 05:00:00Start Date: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962 TC6684447.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation A&E PLASTICS CO. A & J SYSTEMSPRP Name: PRP: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 6/30/2010 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2006-09-18 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: ST COOPAction Name: MAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: HQual: 9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-03-01 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: SIAction Name: SIAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 4/1/1980 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1980-04-01 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: DISCVRYAction Name: DSAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name: CAD980818579EPA ID: 0902093Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: SQual: 1/29/2020 6:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2020-01-24 06:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RMVLAction Name: RVAction Code: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962 TC6684447.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 169 additional PRP: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access AREMAC HEAT TREATING,INC. AREMAC ASSOCIATES ARCADIA MACHINE AND TOOL ANDREW WREN AMERICAN SHEDS INC. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. ALLIED PHOTO PRODUCTS INC. ALLFAST FASTENING SYSTEMS, INC. AIR DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS, INC. AEROSOL SERVICES COMPANY AEROJET-GENERAL CORP. AEROJET ELECTROSYSTEMS ADVANCED HEAT TECHNOLOGY CORP. ADAMS CAMPBELL CO., LTD. ADAMS AND COLTRIN, INC. ACROMIL ACORN ENGINEERING CO. A-1 ORNAMENTAL IRON SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962 4Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: CHLOROFORMSubstance: 67-66-3CAS Number: U044Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: Not reportedScoring: Not reportedPathway: Not reportedSubstance: Not reportedCAS Number: Not reportedSubstance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: NPL: 42.240000000000002Site Score: -118Longitude: 34.125Latitude: 1984-05-08 00:00:00Final Date: NFederal: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: 901951Site ID: CAD980677355EPA ID: 9EPA Region: NPL: ECHO FINDS CONSENT 2787 ft.PRP 1/2-1 ROD ESE US ENG CONTROLSEL MONTE, CA 91733 Region SEMSPECK RD & REAL CAD980677355 NPL NPLSAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)NPL Name: NPL: 10Category Value: Distance To Nearest Population-> 0 And <= 1/4 MileCategory Description: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 135Category Value: Depth To Aquifer-> 100 FeetCategory Description: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: NPL: serious problem that required taking immediate remedial action. Gabriel Valley sites, was added to the NPL in May 1984 because it involves a sources of contamination. This site, along with the three other San management of the problem. EPA continues its investigation to identify extent of contamination and to develop alternatives for treatment and remedial investigation/feasibility study to determine the aerial and vertical The State Department of Health Services and EPA arepreparing to initiate a will begin soon to get a snapshot view of the degree of contamination. the system soon. A supplemental sampling program of contaminated wells company has already purchased a treatment system and will begin operation of water to two of the three companies that have no alternate supply. The third in December l983, EPA will install water treatment systems to provide clean 1984): As a result of EPA s analysis of initial remedial measures, completed and have advised their customers to use bottled water. Status June Currently, three small mutual water companies have no alternate water supply below such levels are not effective, wells are removed from service. consumption. When alternative methods of reducing the TCE and PCE levels billion ppb) of TCE and 4 ppb PCE, levels considered safe for human have tested to ensure that their water supplies contain less than 5 parts per 200,000 people are affected. Cities and public water companies in the area Suggested No Adverse Response Levels SNARL) for TCE and PCE. Approximately local water companies. Many public wells in this area exceed the EPA and carbon tetrachloride CTC) according to analyses by State agencies and water is contaminated with trichloroethylene TCE), perchloroethylene PCE), east. It is approximately 4 miles long and 1.5 miles wide. Ground County, California. The plume also parallels the San Gabriel River to the Pit Wash in the San Gabriel ground water basin in El Monte, Los Angeles ground water plume that runs along the axis of the Rio Hondo Wash and the Salt Conditions at listing September 1983): San Gabriel Valley Area 1) is a Summary Details: 2Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE)Substance: 79-01-6CAS Number: U228Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: TETRACHLOROETHENESubstance: 127-18-4CAS Number: U210Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RV ASSESSAction Name: RSAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: IRQual: 9/30/2003 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2000-09-27 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: RAAction Name: RAAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: SEMS Detail: Not reportedNon NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPLNPL: NFF: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: 06037FIPS Code: 28,31,38Cong District: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: SEMS: FinalNPL Status: Not reportedDeleted Date: 05/08/1984Final Date: 09/08/1983Proposed Date: NPL: 09/08/83Date Proposed: 05/08/84Date Finalized: Not reportedDate Deleted: NFederal Site: FSite Status: 0901951Site ID: 09EPA Region: NPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 4/1/1980 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1980-04-01 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: DISCVRYAction Name: DSAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 3/31/1993 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1987-04-01 05:00:00Start Date: 5SEQ: RI/FSAction Name: COAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/29/1988 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1987-04-01 05:00:00Start Date: 4SEQ: RI/FSAction Name: COAction Code: 04OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 12/27/1991 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1991-12-27 05:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/16/2003 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2003-05-16 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: O AND FAction Name: OFAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: HQual: 9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-09-01 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: PAAction Name: PAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/28/2006 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2006-09-28 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: 5 YEARAction Name: FEAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2000-09-28 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: CIAction Name: CRAction Code: 00OU: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2006-06-21 04:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: CIAction Name: CRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 3/29/1989 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1988-05-25 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RAAction Name: RAAction Code: 03OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/14/2011 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2011-09-14 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: 5 YEARAction Name: FEAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/16/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2003-05-16 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: LT RESPAction Name: LRAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6/25/1991 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1991-06-25 04:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: ADMIN RECAction Name: ARAction Code: 04OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 8/16/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2008-08-07 05:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: RAAction Name: RAAction Code: 05OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/30/2016 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2015-10-07 05:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: 5 YEARAction Name: FEAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/11/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2012-09-26 05:00:00Start Date: 4SEQ: 5 YEARAction Name: FEAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ADMIN RECAction Name: ARAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 1984-05-01 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: CIAction Name: CRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: HQual: 9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-03-01 05:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: SIAction Name: SIAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 11/10/1999 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1997-03-27 05:00:00Start Date: 6SEQ: RI/FSAction Name: COAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: EQual: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 1993-04-28 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: GWTRMONAction Name: GMAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/16/1992 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1992-09-16 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: ECO RISKAction Name: JFAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/8/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-09-08 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: PROPOSEDAction Name: NPAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 1993-08-25 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2013-07-01 05:00:00Start Date: 4SEQ: RAAction Name: RAAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 7/1/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2012-08-12 04:00:00Start Date: 5SEQ: RDAction Name: RDAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/29/2000 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2000-09-29 04:00:00Start Date: 6SEQ: RODAction Name: ROAction Code: 05OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/19/1990 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1990-09-19 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RV ASSESSAction Name: RSAction Code: 00OU: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 1989-09-15 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: TECH ASSISTAction Name: TAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-09-01 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: HAZRANKAction Name: HRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: EQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 1989-03-02 05:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: ADMIN RECAction Name: ARAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 3/31/2006 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1988-01-12 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: ST COOPAction Name: MAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 7/18/1991 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1988-09-14 04:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: RDAction Name: RDAction Code: 04OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 3/29/2002 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1999-04-05 04:00:00Start Date: 4SEQ: RDAction Name: RDAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/29/1988 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1988-09-29 04:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: RODAction Name: ROAction Code: 04OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/11/1984 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1984-05-11 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RODAction Name: ROAction Code: 03OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RODAction Name: ROAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/11/1984 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-06-13 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RI/FSAction Name: COAction Code: 03OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/8/1984 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1984-05-08 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: NPL FINLAction Name: NFAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/16/1992 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1992-09-16 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: R/H ASMTAction Name: EDAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 6/13/1991 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1988-09-14 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: RDAction Name: RDAction Code: 04OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 2/4/1988 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1985-09-30 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RDAction Name: RDAction Code: 03OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 6/23/1999 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1999-06-23 04:00:00Start Date: 5SEQ: RODAction Name: ROAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 3/31/1993 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1993-03-31 05:00:00Start Date: 4SEQ: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2020-11-24 06:00:00Start Date: 5SEQ: 5 YEARAction Name: FEAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 11/1/2019 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2010-07-14 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: RIAction Name: RIAction Code: 05OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2013-05-10 05:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: LT RESPAction Name: LRAction Code: 05OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2000-09-29 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: GWTRMONAction Name: GMAction Code: 05OU: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2016-02-25 05:00:00Start Date: 10SEQ: RI/FSAction Name: COAction Code: 05OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2012-12-13 05:00:00Start Date: 6SEQ: CIAction Name: CRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2011-12-22 05:00:00Start Date: 5SEQ: CIAction Name: CRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2011-12-22 05:00:00Start Date: 4SEQ: CIAction Name: CRAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8/16/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2003-09-22 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: PRP RDAction Name: BEAction Code: 05OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2019-08-01 05:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: TECH ASSISTAction Name: TAAction Code: 07OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2010-10-07 04:00:00Start Date: 4SEQ: ST COOPAction Name: MAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2020-02-13 06:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: FPA/MAAction Name: FMAction Code: 08OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PRP RDAction Name: BEAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/22/2010 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2003-11-14 05:00:00Start Date: 7SEQ: PRP RDAction Name: BEAction Code: 08OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 2/9/2010 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2003-11-14 05:00:00Start Date: 4SEQ: PRP RDAction Name: BEAction Code: 09OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/13/2008 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2003-11-14 05:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: PRP RDAction Name: BEAction Code: 08OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2016-11-08 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: PRP LRAction Name: MEAction Code: 08OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/29/2000 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1995-07-25 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: PRP RI/FSAction Name: BDAction Code: 05OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 6/23/1999 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1995-03-16 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: PRP RI/FSAction Name: BDAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 4/28/2005 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2003-11-14 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2013-05-16 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: OMAction Name: OMAction Code: 02OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 2/19/2020 6:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2010-09-22 04:00:00Start Date: 6SEQ: PRP RAAction Name: BFAction Code: 08OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 2/19/2020 6:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2008-05-13 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: PRP RAAction Name: BFAction Code: 08OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: Not reportedFinish Date: 2016-11-08 05:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: PRP LRAction Name: MEAction Code: 09OU: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 5/25/1998 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1990-04-16 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: LT RESPAction Name: LRAction Code: 03OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 9/30/1990 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1985-09-30 05:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: RI/FSAction Name: COAction Code: 01OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 6/30/2010 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2006-09-18 04:00:00Start Date: 3SEQ: ST COOPAction Name: MAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 6/30/2010 5:00:00 AMFinish Date: 2006-09-18 04:00:00Start Date: 2SEQ: ST COOPAction Name: MAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1993Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 03/31/1993Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 02Operable Unit: 4Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: Media: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2006Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: GroundwaterContaminated Media: 05Operable Unit: 2Action ID: Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 11/10/2005Action Taken Date: Not reportedEvent Code: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: SIte: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: HQual: 9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date: 1983-03-01 05:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: SIAction Name: SIAction Code: 00OU: NFF: FNPL: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name: CAD980677355EPA ID: 0901951Site ID: 09Region: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEvent Code: 08/22/2002Action Taken Date: Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2002Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 08/22/2002Action Taken Date: Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1984Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 05/11/1984Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 03Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2000Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 11/10/1999Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 02Operable Unit: 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2006Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 11/10/2005Action Taken Date: Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name: 05Operable Unit: 2Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2006Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 11/10/2005Action Taken Date: Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name: 05Operable Unit: 2Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2002Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 08/22/2002Action Taken Date: Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2002Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1993Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/22/1993Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 04Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1993Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/22/1993Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 04Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1993Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/22/1993Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 04Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 11/10/1999Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 02Operable Unit: 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2000Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 11/10/1999Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 02Operable Unit: 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1987Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/30/1987Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 03Operable Unit: 2Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1993Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/22/1993Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 04Operable Unit: 1Action ID: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1984Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 05/11/1984Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 03Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2000Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 11/10/1999Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 02Operable Unit: 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2000Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 11/10/1999Action Taken Date: ROD AmendmentAction Name: 02Operable Unit: 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2000Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1988Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/29/1988Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 04Operable Unit: 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1988Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/29/1988Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 04Operable Unit: 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1984Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 05/11/1984Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 03Operable Unit: 1Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 06/23/1999Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 5Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1999Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 06/23/1999Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 5Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1988Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/29/1988Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 04Operable Unit: 3Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1988Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/29/1988Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 04Operable Unit: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1999Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 06/23/1999Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 5Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1999Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 06/23/1999Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 5Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1999Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 06/23/1999Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 5Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1999Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05Operable Unit: 6Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2000Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/29/2000Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 05Operable Unit: 6Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1999Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 06/23/1999Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 5Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1999Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 06/23/1999Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: 01Operable Unit: 5Action ID: GroundwaterContaminated Media: CAD980677355EPA ID: -118.000000Longitude: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 1993-03-31 00:00:00Action Completion: 4SEQ ID: WHITTIER-NARROWSOperable Unit Number: GOVT Decision Document (ROD)Action: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 1988-09-29 00:00:00Action Completion: 3SEQ ID: SUBURBANOperable Unit Number: GOVT Decision Document (ROD)Action: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 1984-05-11 00:00:00Action Completion: 1SEQ ID: RICHWOOD WATER COMPANYOperable Unit Number: GOVT Decision Document (ROD)Action: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: ROD: -118.000000Longitude: +34.125000Latitude: NSuperfund Alternative Agreement: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 2000Fiscal Year: NFederal Facility: Not reportedEvent: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedEvent Code: 09/29/2000Action Taken Date: Record of DecisionAction Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WHITTIER-NARROWSOperable Unit Number: GOVT ROD AmendmentAction: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 1987-09-30 00:00:00Action Completion: 2SEQ ID: RICHWOOD WATER COMPANYOperable Unit Number: GOVT ROD AmendmentAction: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 1993-09-22 00:00:00Action Completion: 1SEQ ID: SUBURBANOperable Unit Number: GOVT ROD AmendmentAction: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 2005-11-10 00:00:00Action Completion: 2SEQ ID: SOUTH EL MONTEOperable Unit Number: GOVT ESDAction: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 2002-08-22 00:00:00Action Completion: 1SEQ ID: EL MONTEOperable Unit Number: GOVT ESDAction: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CONSENT: 482 additional PRP: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access AIR DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS, INC. AIR DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS, INC. AEROSOL SERVICES COMPANY AEROJET-GENERAL CORP. AEROJET-GENERAL CORP. AEROJET-GENERAL CORP. AEROJET ELECTROSYSTEMS ADVANCED HEAT TECHNOLOGY CORP. ADAMS FAMILY TRUST ADAMS AND COLTRIN, INC. ADAMS AND CAMPBELL COMPANY LTD. ACROMIL ACORN ENGINEERING CO. ABERCROMBIE, DEANNA A-1 ORNAMENTAL IRON A&E PLASTICS CO. A & L MOTOR PARTS, INC. A & J SYSTEMS A & B BUS COMPANY A & A SCREW PRODUCTSPRP Name: PRP: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 2000-09-29 00:00:00Action Completion: 6SEQ ID: SOUTH EL MONTEOperable Unit Number: GOVT ROD for PRP RemedyAction: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 1999-06-23 00:00:00Action Completion: 5SEQ ID: EL MONTEOperable Unit Number: GOVT ROD for PRP RemedyAction: 901951Site ID: 9RG: CAD980677355EPA ID: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: Not reportedNon NPL Status: FinalNPL Status: 1999-11-10 00:00:00Action Completion: 3SEQ ID: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 TC6684447.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110009329538DFR URL: 110009329538Registry ID: 1000114959Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring. that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include; has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated SUPERFUND NPL Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110009329538Registry ID: FINDS: LOS ANGELESCounty: EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip: PECK RD & REALAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name: IN THE MATTER OF: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY SUPERFUND SIName: Not reportedEntered Date: Not reportedDistrict: Not reportedCourt Num: Not reportedCase Title: Not reportedSite ID: CAD980677355EPA ID: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959 Laundry And Drycleaner Agents2013 HYTONE CLEANERS Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Cleaner 462 ft. 0.087 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 352 ft. < 1/8 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 SE 4521 DUBONNET AVE N/A 2 EDR Hist CleanerHYTONE CLEANERS 1018788324 TC6684447.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: YesUniversal Waste Destination Facility: YesUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperator Type: HOI KIM LIOperator Name: OtherOwner Type: HOI KIM LIOwner Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip: 4551 MUSCATEL AVEMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: PERLAC@CONSTRUCTION911.COMContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 626-716-8669Contact Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Contact City,State,Zip: 4551 MUSCATEL AVEContact Address: HOI KIM LIContact Name: CAC002986733EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip: 4551 MUSCATEL AVEHandler Address: HOI KIM LIHandler Name: 2018-10-26 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 547 ft. 0.104 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 355 ft. < 1/8 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 East 4551 MUSCATEL AVE CAC002986733 3 RCRA NonGen / NLRHOI KIM LI 1024766861 TC6684447.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 626-716-8669Owner/Operator Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4551 MUSCATEL AVEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: HOI KIM LIOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 626-716-8669Owner/Operator Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4551 MUSCATEL AVEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: HOI KIM LIOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 2018-11-20 16:30:23.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: HOI KIM LI (Continued)1024766861 TC6684447.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICESNAICS Description: 56299NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: HOI KIM LIHandler Name: 2018-10-26 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: HOI KIM LI (Continued)1024766861 Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: Not reportedContact Telephone: Not reportedContact City,State,Zip: Not reportedContact Address: Not reportedContact Name: CAD982491920EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip: 8626 E GRAND AVEHandler Address: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCHandler Name: 1996-09-01 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA-SQG: HWTS CERS LOS ANGELES CO. HMS HAZNET ECHO 794 ft.FINDSSite 1 of 6 in cluster A 0.150 mi.SWEEPS UST Relative: Higher Actual: 375 ft. 1/8-1/4 CERS HAZ WASTEROSEMEAD, CA 91770 North UST8626 E GRAND AVE CAD982491920 A4 RCRA-SQGSAKAIDA NURSERY INC 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 2002-06-27 03:34:30.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperator Type: NOT REQUIREDOperator Name: Not reportedOwner Type: Not reportedOwner Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip: 8626 E GRAND AVEMailing Address: 3State District: CAState District Owner: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: CAState District Owner: Large Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCHandler Name: 1990-06-21 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: CAState District Owner: Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCHandler Name: 1996-09-01 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: PrivateLegal Status: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: PrivateLegal Status: NOT REQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: Not reportedManifest Broker: Not reportedRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAKAIDA NURSERYName: 2Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: WSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: 06-30-89Active Date: Not reportedCapacity: ATank Status: 19-000-014099-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 06-30-89Created Date: Not reportedAction Date: 06-30-89Referral Date: 44-010353Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 14099Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ROSEMEADCity: 8626 E GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERYName: SWEEPS UST: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10268479CERS ID: 401219Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8626 GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName: CERS HAZ WASTE: -118.079859Longitude: 34.092858Latitude: LOS ANGELES COUNTYPermitting Agency: 14099Facility ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8626 GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERYName: UST: No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: NURSERY AND FLORICULTURE PRODUCTIONNAICS Description: 11142NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: NoCurrent Record: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8626 E GRAND AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6262859981Telephone: HENRY SAKAIDA, PRES.Contact: ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 8626 E GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName: HAZNET: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8626 E GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002829949DFR URL: 110002829949Registry ID: 1000146642Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002829949Registry ID: FINDS: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: WSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: 06-30-89Active Date: Not reportedCapacity: ATank Status: 19-000-014099-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 06-30-89Created Date: Not reportedAction Date: 06-30-89Referral Date: 44-010353Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 14099Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ROSEMEADCity: 8626 E GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 50Waste Quantity: 0.21Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: CAD099452708TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD099452708TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD981373665Trans EPA ID: 99280354Manifest ID: 19990409Receipt Date: 5/17/1999 0:00:00Creation Date: 19990408Shipment Date: CAD982491920Gen EPA ID: 1999Year: Additional Info: 0.63Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method: 135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionCA Waste Code: CAD050099696TSD EPA ID: CAD982491920Gepaid: 1996Year: 0.21Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method: 135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionCA Waste Code: CAD099452708TSD EPA ID: CAD982491920Gepaid: 1999Year: 0.21Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method: 135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionCA Waste Code: CAD099452708TSD EPA ID: CAD982491920Gepaid: 2000Year: 1.14Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method: 221 - Waste oil and mixed oilCA Waste Code: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: CAD982491920Gepaid: 2002Year: 0.1815Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method: 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsCA Waste Code: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: CAD982491920Gepaid: 2002Year: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 50Waste Quantity: 0.21Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: CAD050099696TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD050099696TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD981373665Trans EPA ID: 96390634Manifest ID: 19961122Receipt Date: 12/4/1997 0:00:00Creation Date: 19961121Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 50Waste Quantity: 0.21Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: CAD050099696TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD050099696TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD981373665Trans EPA ID: 96390684Manifest ID: 19961218Receipt Date: 12/4/1997 0:00:00Creation Date: 19961217Shipment Date: CAD982491920Gen EPA ID: 1996Year: Additional Info: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2002Year: Additional Info: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 50Waste Quantity: 0.21Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: CAD099452708TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD099452708TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD981373665Trans EPA ID: 20124418Manifest ID: 20000612Receipt Date: 8/1/2000 0:00:00Creation Date: 20000609Shipment Date: CAD982491920Gen EPA ID: 2000Year: Additional Info: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 50Waste Quantity: 0.21Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD050099696TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD981373665Trans EPA ID: 95790925Manifest ID: 19960826Receipt Date: 12/4/1997 0:00:00Creation Date: 19960820Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 013685-014099Facility Id: TPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8626 GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERYName: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 300Waste Quantity: 1.14Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 221 - Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAT080013352TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAT080016116Trans EPA ID: 22247205Manifest ID: 20021017Receipt Date: 2/21/2003 10:42:43Creation Date: 20021010Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 55Waste Quantity: 0.1815Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: D001RCRA Code: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplus organicsWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAT080013352TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CA0000970392Trans EPA ID: 22012965Manifest ID: 20021231Receipt Date: 4/10/2003 10:20:47Creation Date: 20021223Shipment Date: CAD982491920Gen EPA ID: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1, Section(s) 265.173 40 CFR 1 265.173 - U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, ChapterCitation: 04-10-2019Violation Date: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCSite Name: 401219Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division: plastic used oil drum on site. labeled. Observed operator provided a hazardous waste label to the demonstrating that the container listed above has been properly hazardous waste label. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Submit a photo to the CUPA used motor oil located in the maintenance shop was observed without a Returned to compliance on 04/10/2019. OBSERVATION: 1 x 55 gallons ofViolation Notes: date. characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation name and address of the generator, physical and chemical portable tanks with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containers andViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-10-2019Violation Date: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCSite Name: 401219Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division: current manifest copy for used oil. documenting disposal of used oil for minimum of 3 years. Provide CORRECTIVE ACTION: The Owner/Operator shall maintain copies years. Observed the last used oil manifest copy was on 02/18/2010. failed to retain paperwork documenting disposal of used oil for 3 Returned to compliance on 09/03/2015. OBSERVATION: The Owner/OperatorViolation Notes: manifest, or bills of lading copies for three years. Failure to maintain uniform hazardous waste manifest, consolidatedViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.40(a) 22 CCR 12 66262.40(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 12-16-2014Violation Date: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCSite Name: 401219Site ID: Violations: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10268479CERS ID: 401219Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8626 GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName: CERS: RemovedPermit Status: 00005548TPermit Number: 3PArea: RemovedFacility Status: 0Facility Type: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05-22-2018Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division: significant violations observed. Inspected by Inspector Miguel Gonzalez, Agricultural Inspector III. NoEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-12-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Tony Magallanes, SalesEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 04-10-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division: Violations Observed Inspected by Miguel Gonzalez,AgInspIII; Consent by Mike Gutierrez; NoEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-08-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division: observed on the date of inspection. Inspected by Inspector Miguel Gonzalez. No significant violationsEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-03-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division: closed the used motor oil drum at time of inspection. container listed above has been properly closed. Observed operator CORRECTIVE ACTION: Submit photos to the CUPA demonstrating that the used motor oil located in the maintenance shop was observed open. Returned to compliance on 04/10/2019. OBSERVATION: 1 x 55 gallons ofViolation Notes: leak. stored in a manner which may rupture the container or cause it to container holding hazardous waste must not be opened, handled, or storage, except when it is necessary to add or remove waste. (b) A container holding hazardous waste must always be closed during Failure to meet the following container management requirements: (a) AViolation Description: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 64 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAKAIDA NURSERY INCFacility Name: 401219Site ID: Coordinates: CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Mike Gutierrez (CEO)Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 12-16-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division: No violations per Inspector Gonzalez.Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-19-2013Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Other, not routine, done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-03-2015Eval Date: Other/UnknownEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division: No significant violations observed by Inspector Miguel Gonzalez.Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 05-25-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division: observed on the date of inspection. Inspected by Inspector Miguel A. Gonzalez. No significant violationsEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 05-22-2020Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division: 1, 2018. No significant violations observed on the date of inspection. Sakaida Nursery was inspected by Inspector Miguel A. Gonzalez on MayEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 65 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (626) 807-9412Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: MIKE GUTIERREZEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (626) 285-9981Affiliation Phone: 91770Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RosemeadAffiliation City: 8626 Grand Ave.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: MIKE GUTIERREZEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Debbie GutierrezEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (323) 890-4000Affiliation Phone: 90040-3027Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CommerceAffiliation City: 5825 Rickenbacker RoadAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Los Angeles County FireEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 91770Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RosemeadAffiliation City: 8626 Grand Ave.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -118.081210Longitude: 34.091510Latitude: Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10268479Program ID: HMBPEnv Int Type Code: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 66 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 111998NAICS Code: 2003-10-23 15:27:19.000Create Date: CAD982491920EPA ID: NAICS: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701298City,State,Zip: Not reportedContact Address 2: 8626 E GRAND AVENUEContact Address: HENRY SAKAIDA, PRES.Contact Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000Owner City,State,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 8626 E GRAND AVENUEOwner Address: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC.Owner Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000Mailing City,State,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 8626 E GRAND AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 04/23/2009Last Act Date: 06/21/1990Create Date: 06/30/2008Inactive Date: CAD982491920EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 8626 E GRAND AVEAddress: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName: HWTS: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Office ManagerEntity Title: Debbie GutierrezEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 91770Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: ROSEMEADAffiliation City: 8626 GRAND AVEAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: MIKE GUTIERREZEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 TC6684447.2s Page 67 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 917700000Facility Zip: CAFacility State: Not reportedFacility County: ROSEMEADFacility City: Not reportedFacility Address 2: 8626 E GRAND AVEFacility Address: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCFacility Name: 2008-06-30 00:00:00Inactive Date: 1990-06-21 00:00:00Issued EPA ID Date: Miscellaneous Nondurable Goods WholesalersNAICS Description: 4229NAICS Code: 2002-03-14 16:36:27.000Create Date: CAD982491920EPA ID: 917700000Facility Zip: CAFacility State: Not reportedFacility County: ROSEMEADFacility City: Not reportedFacility Address 2: 8626 E GRAND AVEFacility Address: SAKAIDA NURSERY INCFacility Name: 2008-06-30 00:00:00Inactive Date: 1990-06-21 00:00:00Issued EPA ID Date: All Other Miscellaneous Crop FarmingNAICS Description: SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642 Not reportedMail To: 8182864200Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: CAD980891Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 19019407Facility ID: InactiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: WEST HOLLYWOOD 90069Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 2600 CAMINO RAMONMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 2136610191Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: CAD980891Regulated ID: UTNKIRegulated By: 19019407Facility ID: CA FID UST: 862 ft. Site 2 of 6 in cluster A 0.163 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 378 ft. 1/8-1/4 WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069 North 8633 GRAND AVE N/A A5 CA FID USTPACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625 S106027505 TC6684447.2s Page 68 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ROSEMEAD 91770Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 2600 CAMINO RAMONMailing Address: PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625 (Continued) S106027505 NoFederal Universal Waste: YesUniversal Waste Destination Facility: YesUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperator Type: PAMELA BROOKSOperator Name: OtherOwner Type: PAMELA BROOKSOwner Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip: 4809 MUSCATEL AVEMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: CLAIMS@ANMCONSTRUCTIONINC.COMContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 626-533-9963Contact Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Contact City,State,Zip: 4809 MUSCATEL AVEContact Address: PAMELA BROOKSContact Name: CAC002971799EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip: 4809 MUSCATEL AVEHandler Address: PAMELA BROOKSHandler Name: 2018-07-19 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 919 ft. 0.174 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 366 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NE 4809 MUSCATEL AVE CAC002971799 6 RCRA NonGen / NLRPAMELA BROOKS 1024752002 TC6684447.2s Page 69 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 626-533-9963Owner/Operator Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4809 MUSCATEL AVEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: PAMELA BROOKSOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 2018-08-31 17:12:30.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: PAMELA BROOKS (Continued)1024752002 TC6684447.2s Page 70 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICESNAICS Description: 56299NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: PAMELA BROOKSHandler Name: 2018-07-19 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 626-533-9963Owner/Operator Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4809 MUSCATEL AVEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: PAMELA BROOKSOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: PAMELA BROOKS (Continued)1024752002 Not reportedContact Title: MARIA.SAROUKHANIAN@SCE.COMContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 626-302-4535Contact Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Contact City,State,Zip: P.O. BOX 800Contact Address: MARIA SAROUKHANIANContact Name: CAC002987586EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip: 8533 E. GRAND AVEHandler Address: ROSEMEAD SUBSTATIONHandler Name: 2018-11-01 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 991 ft. 0.188 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 374 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NNW 8533 E. GRAND AVE CAC002987586 7 RCRA NonGen / NLRROSEMEAD SUBSTATION 1024767709 TC6684447.2s Page 71 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: YesUniversal Waste Destination Facility: YesUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperator Type: MARIA SAROUKHANIANOperator Name: OtherOwner Type: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONOwner Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip: P.O. BOX 800Mailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION (Continued) 1024767709 TC6684447.2s Page 72 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 221121NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: ROSEMEAD SUBSTATIONHandler Name: 2018-11-01 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 626-302-4535Owner/Operator Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: P.O. BOX 800Owner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: MARIA SAROUKHANIANOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 626-302-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: P.O. BOX 800Owner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 2018-11-20 16:30:39.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION (Continued) 1024767709 TC6684447.2s Page 73 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ELECTRIC BULK POWER TRANSMISSION AND CONTROLNAICS Description: ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION (Continued) 1024767709 1953Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: NATIONAL CITY, CA 92050Owner City,St,Zip: 2602 HOOVER AVENUEOwner Address: CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPOwner Name: 8182865586Telephone: J. BILLINGTONContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000004976Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEAddress: ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS CENTERName: HIST UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedSTG: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedSWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 06-30-89Created Date: Not reportedAction Date: 06-30-89Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1008Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ROSEMEADCity: 8657 GRAND AVEAddress: CALIF-AMERICAN WATER COName: SWEEPS UST: 1032 ft. Site 1 of 6 in cluster B 0.195 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 376 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NNE HIST UST8657 GRAND AVE N/A B8 SWEEPS USTROSEMEAD OPERATIONS CENTER U001570510 TC6684447.2s Page 74 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring WellLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS CENTER (Continued) U001570510 Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperator Type: MICHAEL PHILLIPSOperator Name: OtherOwner Type: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Not reportedActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: MIKE.PHILLIPS@AMWATER.COMContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 812-565-8080Contact Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Contact City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVENUEContact Address: MICHAEL PHILLIPSContact Name: CAC003081616EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVENUEHandler Address: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name: 2020-08-31 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1032 ft. Site 2 of 6 in cluster B 0.195 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 376 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NNE 8657 GRAND AVENUE CAC003081616 B9 RCRA NonGen / NLRCALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 1026475842 TC6684447.2s Page 75 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: MICHAEL PHILLIPSOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 812-565-8080Owner/Operator Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVENUEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 2020-09-04 15:31:25.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026475842 TC6684447.2s Page 76 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMSNAICS Description: 221310NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name: 2020-08-31 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 812-565-8080Owner/Operator Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVENUEOwner/Operator Address: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026475842 Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: SHAUNA.SARRAS@AMWATER.COMContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 619-446-4768Contact Telephone: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Contact City,State,Zip: 655 W. BROADWAYContact Address: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERContact Name: CAC003062327EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEHandler Address: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name: 2020-04-03 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1032 ft. Site 3 of 6 in cluster B 0.195 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 376 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NNE 8657 GRAND AVE CAC003062327 B10 RCRA NonGen / NLRCALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 1026162341 TC6684447.2s Page 77 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperator Type: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROperator Name: OtherOwner Type: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner Name: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Mailing City,State,Zip: 655 W. BROADWAYMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Not reportedActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026162341 TC6684447.2s Page 78 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMSNAICS Description: 221310NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name: 2020-04-03 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 619-446-4768Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 655 W. BROADWAYOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 619-446-4768Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 655 W. BROADWAYOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 2020-04-08 18:59:32.0Handler Date of Last Change: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026162341 TC6684447.2s Page 79 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026162341 NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperator Type: SHAUNA SARRASOperator Name: OtherOwner Type: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner Name: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Mailing City,State,Zip: 655 W. BROADWAYMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Not reportedActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: SHAUNA.SARRAS@AMWATER.COMContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 619-446-4768Contact Telephone: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Contact City,State,Zip: 655 W. BROADWAYContact Address: SHAUNA SARRASContact Name: CAC003038381EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-1220Handler City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEHandler Address: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name: 2019-10-11 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1032 ft. Site 4 of 6 in cluster B 0.195 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 376 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NNE 8657 GRAND AVE CAC003038381 B11 RCRA NonGen / NLRCALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 1025857897 TC6684447.2s Page 80 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 655 W. BROADWAYOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: SHAUNA SARRASOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 619-446-4768Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 655 W. BROADWAYOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 2019-10-11 18:29:06.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1025857897 TC6684447.2s Page 81 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMSNAICS Description: 221310NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name: 2019-10-11 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 619-446-4768Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1025857897 Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description: PrivateLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 626-286-7414Contact Telephone: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-1221Contact City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEContact Address: DAWN WHITEContact Name: CAP000101139EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-1221Handler City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEHandler Address: ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WAHandler Name: 2001-07-25 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA-SQG: 1032 ft. Site 5 of 6 in cluster B 0.195 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 376 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NNE 8657 GRAND AVE CAP000101139 B12 RCRA-SQGROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WA 1025879610 TC6684447.2s Page 82 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2002-10-22 12:10:49.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Name: PrivateOwner Type: CALIF AMERICAN WATER COOwner Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-1221Mailing City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator: ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WA (Continued) 1025879610 TC6684447.2s Page 83 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: No NAICS Codes FoundNAICS Codes: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description: ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WAHandler Name: 2001-07-25 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 626-289-7924Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN MARINO, CA 91108-2022Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2020 HUNTINGTON DROwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: PrivateLegal Status: CALIF AMERICAN WATER COOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: MERCURYWaste Description: D009Waste Code: IGNITABLE WASTEWaste Description: D001Waste Code: Not DefinedWaste Description: D000Waste Code: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WA (Continued) 1025879610 TC6684447.2s Page 84 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation AZR000515924TSD EPA ID: CAL000424712Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.2085Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including AcidDisposal Method: 222 - Oil/water separation sludgeCA Waste Code: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: CAL000424712Gepaid: 2017Year: 655 W BROADWAY STE 1410Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6194464768Telephone: SHAUNA RACICOTContact: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 8657 GRAND AVEAddress: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERName: HAZNET: Not reportedEPAID: United StatesProperty Owner Country: Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code: CAProperty Owner Stat : RosemeadProperty Owner City: 8657 Grand AveProperty Owner Mailing Address: 626-614-2505Property Owner Phone: California American WaterProperty Owner Name: United StatesOwner Country: 91770Owner Zip Code: CAOwner State: 8657 Grand AveOwner Mail Address: 626-614-2505Owner Phone: 626-614-2533Operator Phone: California American WaterOperator Name: 91770Mailing Address Zip Code: CAMailing Address State: RosemeadMailing Address City: 8657 Grand Ave.Mailing Address: 626-286-0188Fax: 626-523-8744Phone: California American WaterBusiness Name: LACoFA0012898Facility ID: 10282627CERSID: Not reportedTotal Gallons: California American WaterOwner: Not reportedCertified Unified Program Agencies: ROSEMEAD,91770City/Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEAddress: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COName: AST: 1032 ft.HWTSSite 6 of 6 in cluster B 0.195 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 376 ft. 1/8-1/4 LOS ANGELES CO. HMSROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NNE HAZNET8657 GRAND AVE N/A B13 ASTCALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 85 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 343 - Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: YUMA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTrans Name: AZR000515924TSDF EPA ID: WORLDWIDE RECOVERY SYSTEMSTrans 2 Name: CAR000175422Trans 2 EPA ID: UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 015054138JJKManifest ID: 20170616Receipt Date: 8/2/2018 18:30:37Creation Date: 20170605Shipment Date: CAL000424712Gen EPA ID: 2017Year: Additional Info: 0.15Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposal Method: 352 - Other organic solidsCA Waste Code: AZR000515924TSD EPA ID: CAL000424712Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.03Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposal Method: 513 - Empty containers less than 30 gallonsCA Waste Code: AZR000515924TSD EPA ID: CAL000424712Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.0125Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposal Method: 512 - Other empty containers 30 gallons or moreCA Waste Code: AZR000515924TSD EPA ID: CAL000424712Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.0375Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: 551 - Laboratory waste chemicalsCA Waste Code: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: CAL000424712Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.15Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposal Method: 343 - Unspecified organic liquid mixtureCA Waste Code: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 86 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: PQuantity Unit: 75Waste Quantity: 0.0375Quantity Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteMeth Code: D001RCRA Code: 551 - Laboratory waste chemicals 561 Detergent and soapWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: CROSBY & OVERTONTrans Name: CAD028409019TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 015054141JJKManifest ID: 20170612Receipt Date: 5/20/2018 18:32:00Creation Date: 20170605Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: PQuantity Unit: 300Waste Quantity: 0.15Quantity Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 352 - Other organic solidsWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: YUMA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTrans Name: AZR000515924TSDF EPA ID: WORLDWIDE RECOVERY SYSTEMSTrans 2 Name: CAR000175422Trans 2 EPA ID: UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 015054138JJKManifest ID: 20170616Receipt Date: 8/2/2018 18:30:37Creation Date: 20170605Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: PQuantity Unit: 300Waste Quantity: 0.15Quantity Tons: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 87 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAR000175422Trans 2 EPA ID: UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 015054138JJKManifest ID: 20170616Receipt Date: 8/2/2018 18:30:37Creation Date: 20170605Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 50Waste Quantity: 0.2085Quantity Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including AcidMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 222 - Oil/water separation sludgeWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: DEMENNO KERDOONTrans Name: CAT080013352TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 015054139JJKManifest ID: 20170608Receipt Date: 5/17/2018 18:31:33Creation Date: 20170605Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: PQuantity Unit: 25Waste Quantity: 0.0125Quantity Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 512 - Other empty containers 30 gallons or moreWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: YUMA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTrans Name: AZR000515924TSDF EPA ID: WORLDWIDE RECOVERY SYSTEMSTrans 2 Name: CAR000175422Trans 2 EPA ID: UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 015054138JJKManifest ID: 20170616Receipt Date: 8/2/2018 18:30:37Creation Date: 20170605Shipment Date: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 88 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Section(s) Multiple HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 01-30-2014Violation Date: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COSite Name: 101750Site ID: Violations: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10282627CERS ID: 101750Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEAddress: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COName: CERS: Not reportedPermit Status: Not reportedPermit Number: 3PArea: RemovedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Type: 000961-001008Facility Id: Not reportedPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEAddress: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COName: ClosedPermit Status: 000002489Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 000961-I01008Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8657 GRAND AVEAddress: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COName: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: PQuantity Unit: 60Waste Quantity: 0.03Quantity Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 513 - Empty containers less than 30 gallonsWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: YUMA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTrans Name: AZR000515924TSDF EPA ID: WORLDWIDE RECOVERY SYSTEMSTrans 2 Name: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 89 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Consent by Staff Inspected by Eric Bald, LA Co FDEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 01-30-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: APSAEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Consent by Staff Inspected by Eric Bald, LA Co FDEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 01-30-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 01-30-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: APSAEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 01-30-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERSViolation Source: APSAViolation Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division: lacking template Returned to compliance on 02/28/2014. Tier I qualified facilityViolation Notes: Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan . Failure to prepare and implement a Spill Prevention Control andViolation Description: 6.67, Section(s) 25270.4.5(a) HSC 6.67 25270.4.5(a) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 01-30-2014Violation Date: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COSite Name: 101750Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HMRRPViolation Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division: Returned to compliance on 02/28/2014. HMBP not in CERSViolation Notes: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - GeneralViolation Description: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 90 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 90040-3027Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CommerceAffiliation City: 5825 Rickenbacker RoadAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Los Angeles County FireEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -118.079660Longitude: 34.092210Latitude: Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10282627Program ID: HMBPEnv Int Type Code: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COFacility Name: 101750Site ID: Coordinates: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: violation on site at time of inspection. Jessica Taylor, Operations Supervisor Observed no significantEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-26-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: APSAEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: violation on site at time of inspection. Jessica Taylor, Operations Supervisor Observed no significantEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-26-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-01-2020Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: APSAEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-01-2020Eval Date: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 91 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Shauna SarrasEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (626) 614-2533Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: California American WaterEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (626) 614-2505Affiliation Phone: 91770Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RosemeadAffiliation City: 8657 Grand AveAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: California American WaterEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Manager, Water Quality & Environmental ComplianceEntity Title: Shauna SarrasEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 91770Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RosemeadAffiliation City: 8657 Grand Ave.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (626) 614-2505Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RosemeadAffiliation City: 8657 Grand AveAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: California American WaterEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (323) 890-4000Affiliation Phone: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 92 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8657 GRAND AVEFacility Address: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERFacility Name: 2017-06-30 00:00:00Inactive Date: 2017-02-07 11:17:24.46300Issued EPA ID Date: Water Supply and Irrigation SystemsNAICS Description: 22131NAICS Code: 2017-02-07 11:17:24.547Create Date: CAL000424712EPA ID: NAICS: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101City,State,Zip: SUITE 1410Contact Address 2: 655 W. BROADWAYContact Address: SHAUNA RACICOTContact Name: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner City,State,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 655 W BROADWAY STE 1410Owner Address: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner Name: SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Mailing City,State,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 655 W BROADWAY STE 1410Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 10/23/2018Last Act Date: 02/07/2017Create Date: 06/30/2017Inactive Date: CAL000424712EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 8657 GRAND AVEAddress: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERName: HWTS: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: California American WaterEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 91770Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RosemeadAffiliation City: 8657 Grand AveAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mike PhillipsEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 TC6684447.2s Page 93 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 91770Facility Zip: CAFacility State: Not reportedFacility County: ROSEMEADFacility City: Not reportedFacility Address 2: CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992 RemovedPermit Status: 00004711TPermit Number: 3PArea: RemovedFacility Status: 0Facility Type: 000958-001005Facility Id: TPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701220City,State,Zip: 8633 GRAND AVEAddress: PACIFIC BELL ROSMCA83/E1625Name: PermitPermit Status: 000004023Permit Number: 3PArea: PermitFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 000958-I01005Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701220City,State,Zip: 8633 GRAND AVEAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIAName: PermitPermit Status: 000005205Permit Number: 3PArea: PermitFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 000958-I01005Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701220City,State,Zip: 8633 GRAND AVEAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIAName: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10265749CERS ID: 385545Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8633 E GRAND AVEAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625Name: CERS HAZ WASTE: 1069 ft. Site 3 of 6 in cluster A 0.202 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 381 ft. 1/8-1/4 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770 North LOS ANGELES CO. HMS8633 E GRAND AVE N/A A14 CERS HAZ WASTEAT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625 S100941462 TC6684447.2s Page 94 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliation State: CommerceAffiliation City: 5825 Rickenbacker RoadAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Los Angeles County FireEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T CaliforniaEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: significant violation on site at time of inspection. Robert Fields (Environmental Compliance Manager) Observed noEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-24-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: significant violation on site at time of inspection. Robert Fields (Environmental Compliance Manager) Observed noEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-24-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10265749CERS ID: 385545Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8633 E GRAND AVEAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625Name: CERS: Not reportedFacility Suite: CCHARMLEStaff: BacklogFile Status: 115.0449File Number: 4Region: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8633 E Grand AveAddress: PACIFIC BELLName: WIP: AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625 (Continued) S100941462 TC6684447.2s Page 95 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEntity Title: Peter Burnell, Sigma Consultants, Inc.Entity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (214) 464-1712Affiliation Phone: 75202Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: TXAffiliation State: DallasAffiliation City: 308 S. Akard St., 17th FloorAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T CaliforniaEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (800) 566-9347Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: AT&T CaliforniaEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: National EPCRA ManagerEntity Title: Jeremy McGrueEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 75202Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: TXAffiliation State: DallasAffiliation City: 308 S. Akard St., 17th FloorAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 75202Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: TXAffiliation State: DallasAffiliation City: 308 S. Akard St., 17th FloorAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: AT&T EH&S Hotline - Option #1Entity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (323) 890-4000Affiliation Phone: 90040-3027Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625 (Continued) S100941462 TC6684447.2s Page 96 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625 (Continued) S100941462 -118.079597Longitude: 34.093761Latitude: LOS ANGELES COUNTYPermitting Agency: 1005Facility ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8633 GRAND AVEAddress: PACIFIC BELL ROSMCA83/E1625Name: UST: 1069 ft. Site 4 of 6 in cluster A 0.202 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 381 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 North 8633 GRAND AVE N/A A15 USTPACIFIC BELL ROSMCA83/E1625 U003775858 Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedOwner Type: Not reportedOwner Name: SAN RAMON, CA 94583Mailing City,State,Zip: 2600 CAMINO RAMONMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Not reportedActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: 1989Biennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not reportedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 213-738-8454Contact Telephone: Not reportedContact City,State,Zip: Not reportedContact Address: CHERIE PACKERContact Name: CAD980891725EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip: 8633 GRAND AVEHandler Address: PACIFIC BELLHandler Name: 1990-04-09 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA-LQG: 1069 ft. Site 5 of 6 in cluster A 0.202 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 381 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 North 8633 GRAND AVE CAD980891725 A16 RCRA-LQGPACIFIC BELL 1007199136 TC6684447.2s Page 97 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSub-Part P Indicator: Not reportedManifest Broker: Not reportedRecycler Activity Without Storage: Not reportedExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: Not reportedImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: Not reportedRecognized Trader-Exporter: Not reportedRecognized Trader-Importer: 2014-09-16 00:00:00.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: Not reportedOff-Site Waste Receipt: Not reportedUnderground Injection Control: Not reportedSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: Not reportedSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: Not reportedRecycler Activity with Storage: Not reportedTransfer Facility Activity: Not reportedTransporter Activity: Not reportedMixed Waste Generator: Not reportedImporter Activity: Not reportedShort-Term Generator Activity: Not reportedOperator Type: PACIFIC BELL (Continued)1007199136 TC6684447.2s Page 98 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: TELECOMMUNICATIONSNAICS Description: 5133NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Large Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description: PACIFIC BELLHandler Name: 1990-04-09 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: PACIFIC BELL (Continued)1007199136 Not reportedStatus: ROSEMEADCity: 8633 GRAND AVEAddress: PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625Name: 1Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: WSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: 06-30-89Active Date: Not reportedCapacity: ATank Status: 19-000-001005-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 06-30-89Created Date: 02-05-90Action Date: 02-05-90Referral Date: 44-007506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 1005Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ROSEMEADCity: 8633 GRAND AVEAddress: PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625Name: SWEEPS UST: 1069 ft. Site 6 of 6 in cluster A 0.202 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 381 ft. 1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 North HIST UST8633 GRAND N/A A17 SWEEPS USTPACIFIC BELL (E1-625)1000250075 TC6684447.2s Page 99 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 00012000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: G-79-12KContainer Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107Owner City,St,Zip: 370 THIRD STOwner Address: PACIFIC BELLOwner Name: 4155426758Telephone: E. J. KOEHLERContact Name: PHONE CO.Other Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000016779Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00027A9F.pdfURL: 00027A9FFile Number: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8633 GRANDAddress: PACIFIC BELL (E1-625)Name: HIST UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: WASTESTG: OILTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 250Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 19-000-001005-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-007506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 1005Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: ROSEMEADCity: 8633 GRAND AVEAddress: PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625Name: 2Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: WASTESTG: OILTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 550Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 19-000-001005-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-007506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 1005Comp Number: PACIFIC BELL (E1-625) (Continued)1000250075 TC6684447.2s Page 100 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000250Tank Capacity: 1965Year Installed: W-65-250Container Num: 003Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: W-XX-550Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: PACIFIC BELL (E1-625) (Continued)1000250075 Not reportedState District Owner: Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description: PrivateLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 714-546-5601Contact Telephone: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776Contact City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVEContact Address: MIKE BURNSContact Name: CAD983623869EPA ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776Handler City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVEHandler Address: E T C CARPET MILLSHandler Name: 1992-03-12 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA-SQG: HWTS CERS WIP HIST CORTESE HAZNET EMI 1567 ft.Cortese 0.297 mi.FINDS Relative: Higher Actual: 381 ft. 1/4-1/2 CPS-SLICSAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 NNW LUST5012 WALNUT GROVE CAD983623869 18 RCRA-SQGE T C CARPET MILLS 1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 101 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 2002-06-27 03:35:53.0Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Name: PrivateOwner Type: MIKE BURNSOwner Name: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776Mailing City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVEMailing Address: Not reportedState District: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 102 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 34.1001939Latitude: T0603702935Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603702935Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVE NAddress: E T.C. CARPET MILLSName: LUST: No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: CARPET AND UPHOLSTERY CLEANING SERVICESNAICS Description: 56174NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker: Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description: E T C CARPET MILLSHandler Name: 1992-03-12 00:00:00.0Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 714-546-5601Owner/Operator Telephone: SANTA ANA, CA 92704Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3100 S SUSAN STOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: PrivateLegal Status: MIKE BURNSOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: Not reportedManifest Broker: Not reportedRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 103 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Los AngelesCounty: 04Regional Board: 4Region: LUST REG 4: 06/17/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0603702935Global Id: 09/06/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0603702935Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 02/26/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0603702935Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/06/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0603702935Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail: Los AngelesCity: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name: YUE RONGContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0603702935Global Id: 6264583507Phone Number: jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail: ALHAMBRACity: 900 S FREMONT AVEAddress: LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name: JOHN AWUJOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0603702935Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency: I-03737RB Case Number: JOACase Worker: 06/17/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -118.083728Longitude: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 104 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedAssigned Name: Not reportedSuspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial Use: Not reportedLocal Agency Staff: 34.09416 / -1Lat/Long: LUSTProgram: 5012 WALNUT GROVE, N., SAN GABRIEL, 91776RP Address: E.T.C. CARPET MILLSResponsible Party: Not reportedOwner Contact: Not reportedOrganization: Not reportedSoil Qualifier: Not reportedGW Qualifier: Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater: Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date: Not reportedEnforcement Action Date: Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedRemedial Action Underway: Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted: UNKSource of Cleanup Funding: 1199.2411746169212363946557867Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft): Not reportedWell Name: Not reportedWater System: MOXLEY, LENARDOperator: UNKLeak Source: UNKCause of Leak: Not reportedHow Leak Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Leak Discovered: 6/17/1992Date the Case was Closed: 6/17/1992Date Case Last Changed on Database: Not reportedDate Leak Stopped: Not reportedDate Confirmation Began: 3/5/1990Date Leak Record Entered: 2/26/1990Date Leak First Reported: 9/6/1989Date Leak Discovered: Not reportedEnforcement Type: Not reportedCross Street: 19000Local Agency: UNKStaff: Not reportedW Global ID: T0603702935Global ID: Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site: SoilCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case No: Not reportedSubstance Quantity: DieselSubstance: Case ClosedStatus: I-03737Facility Id: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 105 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEnvirostor Id: CORTESERegion: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVE NAddress: E T.C. CARPET MILLSName: CORTESE: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110070510259Registry ID: STATE MASTER HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT MAJOR corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110012439101Registry ID: FINDS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 115.0178RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: CMCCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -118.098937256835Longitude: 34.0930956420878Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency: SL603799287Global Id: 09/21/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 N. WALNUT GROVEAddress: E T.C. CARPET MILLSName: CPS-SLIC: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 106 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 5NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 4Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 226SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 60562Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 19County Code: 1990Year: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVAddress: ETC. CARPET MILLS, WALNUT DYE&Name: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2273SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 77052Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 19County Code: 1990Year: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVEAddress: ETC CARPET MILLS LTD, MIKE BERName: EMI: Active OpenFile Name: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: Not reportedWID Id: Not reportedRegion 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: activeFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedOwner: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status: LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type: T0603702935Global ID: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 107 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: CAD983623869Gepaid: 1999Year: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 8182863115Telephone: LEONARD MOXLEYContact: SAN GABRIEL, CA 917760000City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 5012 WALNUT GROVEAddress: E T C CARPET MILLSName: HAZNET: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 4Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 5Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2270SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 58162Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 19County Code: 1995Year: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVAddress: E.T.C. CARPET MILLS, LTD.Name: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 4Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 5Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2270SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 58162Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 19County Code: 1993Year: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVAddress: E.T.C. CARPET MILLS, LTD.Name: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 108 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2600Waste Quantity: 10.842Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: D007RCRA Code: code 121 for a list of metals 132 - Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see wasteWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAT080033681TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 93100308Manifest ID: 19930611Receipt Date: 9/8/1995 0:00:00Creation Date: 19930611Shipment Date: CAD983623869Gen EPA ID: 1993Year: Additional Info: 10.842Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method: solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals)) 132 - Aqueous solution with metals (< restricted levels and (AlkalineCA Waste Code: CAT080033681TSD EPA ID: CAD983623869Gepaid: 1993Year: 4.42Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method: 343 - Unspecified organic liquid mixtureCA Waste Code: CAT080033681TSD EPA ID: CAD983623869Gepaid: 1995Year: 25.854Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method: solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals)) 132 - Aqueous solution with metals (< restricted levels and (AlkalineCA Waste Code: CAT080033681TSD EPA ID: CAD983623869Gepaid: 1995Year: 0.8428Tons: D80 - Disposal, Land FillDisposal Method: 151 - Asbestos containing wasteCA Waste Code: CAD009007626TSD EPA ID: CAD983623869Gepaid: 1999Year: 0.162Tons: H01 - Transfer StationDisposal Method: 214 - Unspecified solvent mixtureCA Waste Code: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 109 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 5000Waste Quantity: 20.85Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: D007RCRA Code: code 121 for a list of metals 132 - Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see wasteWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: CAT080033681TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAT080033681TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 92845854Manifest ID: 19950313Receipt Date: 3/29/1996 0:00:00Creation Date: 19950313Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 1200Waste Quantity: 5.004Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: D007RCRA Code: code 121 for a list of metals 132 - Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see wasteWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAT080033681TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 93301204Manifest ID: 19950313Receipt Date: 10/23/1995 0:00:00Creation Date: 19950313Shipment Date: CAD983623869Gen EPA ID: 1995Year: Additional Info: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 110 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 19990910Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 45Waste Quantity: 0.162Quantity Tons: H01 - Transfer StationMeth Code: D001RCRA Code: 214 - Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD028409019TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD982413262Trans EPA ID: 99472408Manifest ID: 19991116Receipt Date: 1/11/2000 0:00:00Creation Date: 19991006Shipment Date: CAD983623869Gen EPA ID: 1999Year: Additional Info: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: GQuantity Unit: 1300Waste Quantity: 4.42Quantity Tons: R01 - RecyclerMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 343 - Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: CAT080033681TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAT080033681TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD072953771Trans EPA ID: 93301475Manifest ID: 19950227Receipt Date: 3/29/1996 0:00:00Creation Date: 19950227Shipment Date: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 111 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LOS ANGELESAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: SL603799287CERS ID: 205894Site ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 N. WALNUT GROVEAddress: E T.C. CARPET MILLSName: CERS: Not reportedFacility Suite: CCHARMLEStaff: ActiveFile Status: 115.0178File Number: 4Region: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 N Walnut GroveAddress: E T.C. CARPET MILLSName: WIP: I-03737Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 19Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: SAN GABRIEL, CACity,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVEedr_fadd1: E T.C. CARPET MILLSedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedAdditional Code 5: Not reportedAdditional Code 4: Not reportedAdditional Code 3: Not reportedAdditional Code 2: Not reportedAdditional Code 1: YQuantity Unit: 1Waste Quantity: 0.8428Quantity Tons: D80 - Disposal, Land FillMeth Code: Not reportedRCRA Code: 151 - Asbestos-containing wasteWaste Code Description: Not reportedTSDF Alt Name: Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAD009007626TSDF EPA ID: Not reportedTrans 2 Name: Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID: Not reportedTrans Name: CAR000017657Trans EPA ID: 99485815Manifest ID: 19990913Receipt Date: 11/16/1999 0:00:00Creation Date: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 112 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN GABRIEL, CA 917762024City,State,Zip: PER 97VQ NSContact Address 2: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVE_DEACTContact Address: LEONARD MOXLEYContact Name: SANTA ANA, CA 927040000Owner City,State,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 3100 S SUSAN STOwner Address: MIKE BERNSOwner Name: SAN GABRIEL, CA 917762024Mailing City,State,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 08/10/2004Last Act Date: 03/12/1992Create Date: 06/30/1997Inactive Date: CAD983623869EPA ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 917760000City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 5012 WALNUT GROVEAddress: E T C CARPET MILLSName: HWTS: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: Los AngelesAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 6264583507Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: ALHAMBRAAffiliation City: 900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0603702935CERS ID: 224438Site ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 5012 WALNUT GROVE AVE NAddress: E T.C. CARPET MILLSName: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755 TC6684447.2s Page 113 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0603705187Global Id: 09/03/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0603705187Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 09/03/1997Date: OtherAction Type: T0603705187Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail: Los AngelesCity: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name: YUE RONGContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0603705187Global Id: 6264583507Phone Number: jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail: ALHAMBRACity: 900 S FREMONT AVEAddress: LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name: JOHN AWUJOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0603705187Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency: R-13296RB Case Number: JOACase Worker: 09/03/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -118.0865722Longitude: 34.09172Latitude: T0603705187Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603705187Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency: ROSEMEAD, CA 91731City,State,Zip: 8366 GRAND AVE EAddress: SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DISTName: LUST: 1672 ft. 0.317 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 372 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERSROSEMEAD, CA 91731 NW Cortese8366 GRAND AVE E N/A 19 LUSTSAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DIST S103282071 TC6684447.2s Page 114 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBeneficial Use: Not reportedLocal Agency Staff: 34.0916961 / -1Lat/Long: LUSTProgram: P.O. BOX 2227, SAN GABRIEL CA 91778-2227RP Address: SAN GABRIEL COUNTY WATER DISTResponsible Party: Not reportedOwner Contact: Not reportedOrganization: Not reportedSoil Qualifier: Not reportedGW Qualifier: Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater: Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date: Not reportedEnforcement Action Date: Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedRemedial Action Underway: Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedSource of Cleanup Funding: 276.99392474831354133247289031Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft): Not reportedWell Name: Not reportedWater System: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedCause of Leak: Not reportedHow Leak Stopped: Not reportedHow Leak Discovered: 9/3/1997Date the Case was Closed: 9/3/1997Date Case Last Changed on Database: Not reportedDate Leak Stopped: Not reportedDate Confirmation Began: 3/19/1998Date Leak Record Entered: 9/3/1997Date Leak First Reported: Not reportedDate Leak Discovered: Not reportedEnforcement Type: Not reportedCross Street: 19000Local Agency: UNKStaff: Not reportedW Global ID: T0603705187Global ID: Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site: SoilCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case No: Not reportedSubstance Quantity: HydrocarbonsSubstance: Case ClosedStatus: R-13296Facility Id: Los AngelesCounty: 04Regional Board: 4Region: LUST REG 4: 09/03/1997Status Date: SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DIST (Continued) S103282071 TC6684447.2s Page 115 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliation State: Los AngelesAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 6264583507Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: ALHAMBRAAffiliation City: 900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0603705187CERS ID: 230393Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91731City,State,Zip: 8366 GRAND AVE EAddress: SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DISTName: CERS: Active OpenFile Name: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: Not reportedWID Id: Not reportedRegion 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: activeFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedOwner: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status: LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type: T0603705187Global ID: Not reportedEnvirostor Id: CORTESERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91731City,State,Zip: 8366 GRAND AVE EAddress: SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DISTName: CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedAssigned Name: Not reportedSuspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DIST (Continued) S103282071 TC6684447.2s Page 116 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DIST (Continued) S103282071 000552423Permit Number: 3PArea: PermitFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 006420-049571Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701112City,State,Zip: 4939 EARLE AVEAddress: PHOENIX COMMISSARYName: ClosedPermit Status: 000005393Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 006420-I06640Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701112City,State,Zip: 4939 EARLE AVEAddress: LADCO LABORATORIES INCName: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 115.0144RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: CMCCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -118.084941Longitude: 34.091795Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency: SL603799253Global Id: 09/21/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4939 N. EARLE AVE.Address: GORDON PEST CONTROLName: CPS-SLIC: 1895 ft. 0.359 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 380 ft. 1/4-1/2 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NW LOS ANGELES CO. HMS4939 N EARLE AVE N/A 20 CPS-SLICGORDON PEST CONTROL U003062324 TC6684447.2s Page 117 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: LOS ANGELESAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: SL603799253CERS ID: 250871Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4939 N. EARLE AVE.Address: GORDON PEST CONTROLName: CERS: Not reportedFacility Suite: CCHARMLEStaff: BacklogFile Status: 115.0144File Number: 4Region: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4939 N Earle AveAddress: GORDON PEST CONTROLName: WIP: PermitPermit Status: GORDON PEST CONTROL (Continued) U003062324 Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 115.0441RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: CMCCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -118.072375Longitude: 34.087196Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency: SL603799546Global Id: 09/21/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4619 N. ROSEMEAD BLVD.Address: C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOSName: CPS-SLIC: 2100 ft. 0.398 mi.CERS Relative: Lower Actual: 349 ft. 1/4-1/2 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770 East LOS ANGELES CO. HMS4619 N ROSEMEAD BLVD N/A 21 CPS-SLICC P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOS S103317131 TC6684447.2s Page 118 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip: 4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName: PermitPermit Status: 000016005Permit Number: 3PArea: PermitFacility Status: 02Facility Type: 007358-025403Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip: 4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName: ClosedPermit Status: 000009848Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 007358-I07711Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip: 4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName: ClosedPermit Status: 000009847Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 007358-I07711Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip: 4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName: ClosedPermit Status: 000009846Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 007358-I07711Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip: 4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOS (Continued) S103317131 TC6684447.2s Page 119 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: LOS ANGELESAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: SL603799546CERS ID: 211469Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4619 N. ROSEMEAD BLVD.Address: C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOSName: CERS: Not reportedFacility Suite: CCHARMLEStaff: BacklogFile Status: 115.0441File Number: 4Region: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4619 N Rosemead BlvdAddress: C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOSName: WIP: PermitPermit Status: 000016006Permit Number: 3PArea: PermitFacility Status: 02Facility Type: 007358-025403Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip: 4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName: PermitPermit Status: 000016007Permit Number: 3PArea: PermitFacility Status: 02Facility Type: 007358-025403Facility Id: IPermit Category: C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOS (Continued) S103317131 TC6684447.2s Page 120 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip: 5001 EARLE AVEAddress: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: RemovedPermit Status: 000173187Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 008300-I08856Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip: 5001 EARLE AVEAddress: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: ClosedPermit Status: 000012076Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 008300-I08856Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip: 5001 EARLE AVEAddress: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 115.0159RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: GJHCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -118.084941Longitude: 34.091795Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency: SL603799268Global Id: 10/29/2014Status Date: Open - InactiveFacility Status: STATERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 5001 N. EARLE AVE.Address: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: CPS-SLIC: 2122 ft.HWTSSite 1 of 2 in cluster C 0.402 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 384 ft. 1/4-1/2 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NW LOS ANGELES CO. HMS5001 EARLE AVE N/A C22 CPS-SLICHUY FONG FOODS INC U003063980 TC6684447.2s Page 121 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 5001 EARLE AVEFacility Address: HUY FONG FOODS INCFacility Name: 2008-06-30 00:00:00Inactive Date: 2005-09-09 14:04:16.61000Issued EPA ID Date: Nonchocolate Confectionery ManufacturingNAICS Description: 31134NAICS Code: 2006-11-27 18:30:15.000Create Date: CAL000298343EPA ID: NAICS: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip: Not reportedContact Address 2: 5001 EARLE AVEContact Address: DONNA LAM - OFC ADMINISTRATORContact Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000Owner City,State,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 5001 EARLE AVEOwner Address: WILLIAM D. TRAN PRESIDENTOwner Name: ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000Mailing City,State,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 5001 EARLE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 04/23/2009Last Act Date: 09/09/2005Create Date: 06/30/2008Inactive Date: CAL000298343EPA ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000City,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress 2: 5001 EARLE AVEAddress: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: HWTS: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: SL603799268CERS ID: 227300Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 5001 N. EARLE AVE.Address: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: CERS: Not reportedFacility Suite: CCHARMLEStaff: BacklogFile Status: 115.0159File Number: 4Region: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 5001 N Earle AveAddress: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: WIP: Not reportedPermit Status: Not reportedPermit Number: 3PArea: OPENFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Type: 008300-042143Facility Id: HUY FONG FOODS INC (Continued)U003063980 TC6684447.2s Page 122 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 917700000Facility Zip: CAFacility State: Not reportedFacility County: ROSEMEADFacility City: Not reportedFacility Address 2: HUY FONG FOODS INC (Continued)U003063980 -118.08778516Longitude: 34.091885869Latitude: 7814.1684812Shape Area: 313.76068367Shape Length: 5Sup District: Not reportedOperator Telephone: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedDescription: Not reportedStatus: 174Site Number: CACity,State,Zip: Not reportedAddress: CITY OF SAN GABRIEL DISPOSALName: LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: 2146 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster D 0.406 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 351 ft. 1/4-1/2 , CA WNW N/A D23 LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANECITY OF SAN GABRIEL DISPOSAL S127127916 T0603704697Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency: R-05784RB Case Number: JOACase Worker: 08/13/1985Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -118.073673Longitude: 34.08669Latitude: T0603704697Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603704697Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress: TEXACOName: LUST: 2195 ft. 0.416 mi.CERS Relative: Lower Actual: 342 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEROSEMEAD, CA 91770 ESE Cortese4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N N/A 24 LUSTTEXACO S104164138 TC6684447.2s Page 123 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLocal Case No: Not reportedSubstance Quantity: GasolineSubstance: Leak being confirmedStatus: R-05784Facility Id: Los AngelesCounty: 04Regional Board: 4Region: LUST REG 4: 08/13/1985Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0603704697Global Id: 07/22/1985Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0603704697Global Id: 07/22/1985Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0603704697Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 07/22/1985Date: OtherAction Type: T0603704697Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 07/22/1985Date: OtherAction Type: T0603704697Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 07/22/1985Date: OtherAction Type: T0603704697Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail: Los AngelesCity: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name: YUE RONGContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0603704697Global Id: 6264583507Phone Number: jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail: ALHAMBRACity: 900 S FREMONT AVEAddress: LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name: JOHN AWUJOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: TEXACO (Continued)S104164138 TC6684447.2s Page 124 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEnvirostor Id: CORTESERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress: TEXACOName: CORTESE: OLD CASE #000207Summary: Not reportedAssigned Name: Not reportedSuspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial Use: Not reportedLocal Agency Staff: 34.0863483 / -1Lat/Long: LUSTProgram: 4441 NORTH ROSEMEAD BLVD., ROSEMEAD, CARP Address: TEXACO USAResponsible Party: Not reportedOwner Contact: Not reportedOrganization: Not reportedSoil Qualifier: Not reportedGW Qualifier: Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater: Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date: Not reportedEnforcement Action Date: Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedRemedial Action Underway: Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted: UNKSource of Cleanup Funding: 912.2405636084677731570442014Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft): Not reportedWell Name: Not reportedWater System: WAGNER, W.W.Operator: UNKLeak Source: UNKCause of Leak: Not reportedHow Leak Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Leak Discovered: Not reportedDate the Case was Closed: 8/24/1987Date Case Last Changed on Database: 7/22/1985Date Leak Stopped: 7/22/1985Date Confirmation Began: 12/31/1986Date Leak Record Entered: 7/22/1985Date Leak First Reported: 7/22/1985Date Leak Discovered: Not reportedEnforcement Type: Not reportedCross Street: 19000Local Agency: UNKStaff: Not reportedW Global ID: T0603704697Global ID: Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site: SoilCase Type: TEXACO (Continued)S104164138 TC6684447.2s Page 125 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: Los AngelesAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 6264583507Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: ALHAMBRAAffiliation City: 900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0603704697CERS ID: 187584Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress: TEXACOName: CERS: R-05784Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 19Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4441 ROSEMEADedr_fadd1: TEXACOedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: Active OpenFile Name: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: Not reportedWID Id: Not reportedRegion 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: activeFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedOwner: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status: LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type: T0603704697Global ID: TEXACO (Continued)S104164138 TC6684447.2s Page 126 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSite Is Archived: NotificationSite Regulatory Status: ActiveSite Operational Status: Nai TeurnPoint of Contact: Not reportedPermitted Depth Type: Not reportedPermitted Depth: Not reportedPermitted Elevation Type: Not reportedPermitted Elevation: Not reportedDisposal Acreage: Not reportedTotal Acreage: Cubic Yards per yearCapacity Units: 68000Capacity: Not reportedRemaining Capacity Date: Not reportedRemaining Capacity: Cubic Yards per DayThroughput Units: 60Throughput: QuarterlyInspection Frequency: Not reportedCease Operation Type: Not reportedCease Operation: Not reportedWDR Landfill Class: Not reportedWDR Number: Solid Waste OperationActivity Classification: Transfer/ProcessingCategory: NoActivity Is Archived: Limited Volume Transfer OperationActivity: City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name: 19-AA-0004SWIS Number: Activity: NotificationRegulation Status: Department of Public HealthEnforcing Agency Department: County of Los AngelesEnforcing Agency Legal Name: Department of Public HealthReporting Agency Department: County of Los AngelesReporting Agency Legal Name: San GabrielLocal Government: Los AngelesSWRCB Region: South CoastARB District: Not reportedEPA Federal Registry ID: Not reportedClosed Illegal Abandoned Category: Not reportedAbsorbed By: ActiveOperational Status: Not reportedAbsorbed On: NoIs Financial Assurances Responsible: NoIs Site Inert Debris Engineered Fill: NoIs Closed Illegal Abandoned: NoIs Archived: Nai TeurnPoint of Contact: 19-AA-0004SWIS Number: 19-AA-0004Facility ID: STATERegion: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 917 EAST GRAND AVENUEAddress: CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKSName: SWF/LF (SWIS): 2234 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster D 0.423 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 363 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 WNW CERS917 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A D25 SWF/LFCITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKS S119777587 TC6684447.2s Page 127 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContact Name: 12/9/2016Started On: NoIs Archived: -118.09002Longitude: 34.09174Latitude: NotificationSite Regulatory Status: Non-Disposal OnlySite Type: ActiveSite Operational Status: City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name: 91776Owner Zip: CAOwner State: San GabrielOwner City: Public Work Department P.O. Box 130Owner Address: City of San GabrielOwner: 19-AA-0004SWIS Number: Owner: 91776Operator Zip: CAOperator State: San GabrielOperator City: Public Works Department 917 E. Grand AveStreet Address: (626) 308-2825Contact Phone: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact Name: 12/9/2016Started On: City of San GabrielOperator: NoIs Archived: -118.09002Longitude: 34.09174Latitude: NotificationSite Regulatory Status: Non-Disposal OnlySite Type: ActiveSite Operational Status: City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name: 19-AA-0004SWIS Number: Operator: Department of Public HealthEnforcing Agency Department: County of Los AngelesEnforcing Agency Legal Name: Department of Public HealthReporting Agency Department: County of Los AngelesReporting Agency Legal Name: 91776ZIP Code: CAState: San GabrielCity: 917 East Grand AvenueStreet Address: San GabrielLocal Government: Los AngelesSWRCB Region: South CoastARB District: Los AngelesCounty: Not reportedEPA Federal Registry ID: Not reportedClosed Illegal Abandoned Category: Not reportedAbsorbed By: Not reportedAbsorbed On: NoIs Financial Assurances Responsible: NoIs Site Inert Debris Engineered Fill: NoIs Closed Illegal Abandoned: CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) S119777587 TC6684447.2s Page 128 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 507818Site ID: SAN GABRIEL, CACity,State,Zip: 917 EAST GRAND AVENUEAddress: CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKSName: CERS: Solid Waste OperationActivity Classification: Transfer/ProcessingActivity Category: NotificationActivity Regulatory Status: ActiveActivity Operational Status: NoActivity Is Archived: Nai TeurnPoint of Contact: Non-Disposal OnlySite Type: NotificationSite Regulatory Status: ActiveSite Operational Status: NoSite Is Archived: Mixed municipalWaste Type: Limited Volume Transfer OperationActivity: City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name: 19-AA-0004SWIS Number: Solid Waste OperationActivity Classification: Transfer/ProcessingActivity Category: NotificationActivity Regulatory Status: ActiveActivity Operational Status: NoActivity Is Archived: Nai TeurnPoint of Contact: Non-Disposal OnlySite Type: NotificationSite Regulatory Status: ActiveSite Operational Status: NoSite Is Archived: Green MaterialsWaste Type: Limited Volume Transfer OperationActivity: City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name: 19-AA-0004SWIS Number: Solid Waste FacilityActivity Classification: DisposalActivity Category: ExemptActivity Regulatory Status: ClosedActivity Operational Status: YesActivity Is Archived: Nai TeurnPoint of Contact: Non-Disposal OnlySite Type: NotificationSite Regulatory Status: ActiveSite Operational Status: NoSite Is Archived: Construction/demolitionWaste Type: Inert Waste Disposal SiteActivity: City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name: 19-AA-0004SWIS Number: Waste: (626) 308-2825Contact Phone: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Title: CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) S119777587 TC6684447.2s Page 129 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6263082825Affiliation Phone: 91776Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San GabrielAffiliation City: Public Work DepartmentP.O. Box 130Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CITY OF SAN GABRIELEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: 6263082825Affiliation Phone: 91776Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San GabrielAffiliation City: Public Works Department917 E. Grand AveAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CITY OF SAN GABRIELEntity Name: Legal OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Solid Waste and Recycle SitesCERS Description: 19-AA-0004CERS ID: CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) S119777587 ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip: 5045 EARLE AVEAddress: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 115.0445RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: CMCCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -118.084941Longitude: 34.091795Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency: SL603799550Global Id: 09/21/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 5045 N. EARLE AVE.Address: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: CPS-SLIC: 2300 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C 0.436 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 385 ft. 1/4-1/2 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770 NW LOS ANGELES CO. HMS5045 N EARLE AVE N/A C26 CPS-SLICHUY FONG FOODS INC S102229418 TC6684447.2s Page 130 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: LOS ANGELESAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: SL603799550CERS ID: 257476Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 5045 N. EARLE AVE.Address: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: CERS: Not reportedFacility Suite: CCHARMLEStaff: BacklogFile Status: 115.0445File Number: 4Region: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 5045 N Earle AveAddress: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: WIP: Not reportedPermit Status: Not reportedPermit Number: 3PArea: OPENFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Type: 017363-042144Facility Id: Not reportedPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip: 5045 EARLE AVEAddress: HUY FONG FOODS INCName: ClosedPermit Status: 000014276Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 017363-023543Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: HUY FONG FOODS INC (Continued)S102229418 TC6684447.2s Page 131 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation significant human population, or render unusable a potential domestic adverse impact on receiving biota, can cause aesthetic impairment to a Moderate Threat to Water Quality. A violation could have a majorThreat to Water Quality: CITY OF SAN GABRIELSolid Waste Assessment Test Program: FalseDepartment of Defence: FalseResource Conservation Recovery Act: FalseToxic Pits Cleanup Act Program: TrueSolid Waste Assessment Test Program: TrueWaste Discharge System: Not reportedLast Facility Editors: Not reportedComments: Not reportedSecondary SIC: 4953Primary SIC: SAN GABRIEL DISPOSAL SITESWAT Facility Name: 8182824104Facility Telephone: Not reportedFacility Description: Industrial, Agricultural or Solid Waste (Class I, II or III) Other - Does not fall into the category of Municipal/Domestic,Facility Type: 4Region: 2132824104Land Owner Phone: Not reportedLand Owner Contact: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776Land Owner City,St,Zip: P.O. BOX 130Land Owner Address: CITY OF SAN GABRIELLand Owner Name: 8182824104Agency Telephone: Not reportedAgency Contact: SAN GABRIEL ,CA 91778Agency City,St,Zip: P.O.BOX 130Agency Address: Not reportedAgency Department: 86 SAN GABRIEL, CITY OFAgency Name: CityAgency Type: TrueWaste List: FalseOpen To Public: FalseSuperorder: FalseMunicipal Solid Waste: Not reportedRegional Board ID: 1Tonnage: Not reportedNPID: Not reportedBase Meridian: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: rubble and concrete are examples of this category. Such wastes could cause turbidity and siltation. Uncontaminated soils, or organic wastes and have little adverse impact on water quality. Inert/Influent or Solid Wastes that do not contain soluble pollutantsPrimary Waste Type: SLDWSTPrimary Waste: products, solid wastes, and sewage pump out facilities. treatment systems that are complex, such as marinas with petroleum disposal), or any Class II or III disposal site, or facilities without waste treatment system (except for septic systems with subsurface Category B - Any facility having a physical, chemical, or biologicalComplexity: Not reportedEdit Date: WMUDS/SWAT: 2301 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster D 0.436 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 365 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL ,CA, CA 91778 WNW 911 GRAND N/A D27 WMUDS/SWAT911 GRAND, SAN GABRIEL S104156393 TC6684447.2s Page 132 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 19-AA-0004Solid Waste Information ID: 4B190315001Waste Discharge System ID: Quarterly SubmittalSelf-Monitoring Rept. Frequency: HWaste Discharge Requirements: NoRCRA Facility: Not reportedSection Range: 1Number of WMUDS at Facility: BPBRegional Board Project Officer: TrueSub Chapter 15: from a waste treatment facility. or municipal water supply. Awsthetic impairment would include nuisance 911 GRAND, SAN GABRIEL (Continued) S104156393 N/ASite Mailing Address: 5District: Not reportedOwner Email: Not reportedOwner Telephone: Not reportedOwner Contact: Not reportedOwner City/State/Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: City of San GabrielOwner Name: Not reportedOperator Email: (818) 308-2806Operator Telephone: Not reportedOperator Contact: San Gabriel, CA 91776Operator City/State/Zip: 927 E. Grand AvenueOperator Address: City of San GabrielOperator Name: Detail As Of 01/2014: Not reportedDisposal Area (Acre): Monday - Thursday 6:30 am - 4 pm; Friday 6:30 am - 3 pmHours of Operation: Green Materials;Household Trash;Waste Accepted: ActiveStatus: N/ARemaining Capacity(Million): Transfer/Processing FacilityPresent Use: 735Permitted Capacity: Not reportedMaximun Depth Fill(Ft): County Of Los Angeles Department of Public HealthLocal Enforcement Agency: N/AEnding Operation Date: N/ABeginning Operation Date: 19-AA-0004Site SWIS Number: Transfer and Processing FacilitySite Type: N/ASite Website: jlopez@sgch.orgSite Email: (626) 308-2825Site Contact Phone: Not reportedSite Contact: N/AAlt. Address: N/AAlt. Site Name: 174Site ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 927 E. GRAND AVENUEAddress: CITY OF SAN GABRIEL DISPOSALName: LOS ANGELES CO. LF: 2327 ft. 0.441 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 368 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 NW 927 E. GRAND AVENUE N/A 28 SWF/LFCITY OF SAN GABRIEL DISPOSAL S111075845 TC6684447.2s Page 133 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: LOS ANGELESAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: SL603799257CERS ID: 234785Site ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 851 E. GRAND AVE.Address: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HUMANE SOCName: CERS: Not reportedFacility Suite: CCHARMLEStaff: BacklogFile Status: 115.0148File Number: 4Region: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 851 E Grand AveAddress: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HUMANE SOCName: WIP: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 115.0148RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: CMCCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -118.088669Longitude: 34.091781Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency: SL603799257Global Id: 02/23/2016Status Date: Open - InactiveFacility Status: STATERegion: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 851 E. GRAND AVE.Address: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HUMANE SOCName: CPS-SLIC: 2382 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster D 0.451 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 367 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERSSAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 WNW WIP851 E GRAND AVE N/A D29 CPS-SLICSAN GABRIEL VALLEY HUMANE SOC S106485035 TC6684447.2s Page 134 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6A189011N04Reg Id: WBC&DReg By: 18Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 1425 DELTAedr_fadd1: ALVAREZ, CHARLES & JEANETedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: 2505 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster E 0.474 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 328 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 SW 1425 DELTA N/A E30 HIST CORTESEALVAREZ, CHARLES & JEANET S105026225 6A189011N05Reg Id: WBC&DReg By: 18Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 1425 DELTAedr_fadd1: ALVAREZ. CHARLES & JEANETedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: 2505 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E 0.474 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 328 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 SW 1425 DELTA N/A E31 HIST CORTESEALVAREZ. CHARLES & JEANET S105026224 R-01935Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 19Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91771City,State,Zip: 4251 ROSEMEADedr_fadd1: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: 2566 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster F 0.486 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 335 ft. 1/4-1/2 ROSEMEAD, CA 91771 SE 4251 ROSEMEAD N/A F32 HIST CORTESEROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER S104160265 LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName: LUST: CERS 2566 ft.WIPSite 2 of 2 in cluster F 0.486 mi.LOS ANGELES CO. HMS Relative: Lower Actual: 335 ft. 1/4-1/2 CorteseROSEMEAD, CA 91770 SE SWEEPS UST4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD N N/A F33 LUSTROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER S105032651 TC6684447.2s Page 135 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0603704579Global Id: 11/01/1995Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0603704579Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 11/01/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0603704579Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 11/01/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0603704579Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 11/01/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0603704579Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail: Los AngelesCity: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name: YUE RONGContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0603704579Global Id: 6264583507Phone Number: jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail: ALHAMBRACity: 900 S FREMONT AVEAddress: LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name: JOHN AWUJOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0603704579Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency: R-01935RB Case Number: JOACase Worker: 08/04/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -118.073674Longitude: 34.083992Latitude: T0603704579Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603704579Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651 TC6684447.2s Page 136 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation U-HAUL COMPANYResponsible Party: Not reportedOwner Contact: Not reportedOrganization: Not reportedSoil Qualifier: Not reportedGW Qualifier: Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater: Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date: Not reportedEnforcement Action Date: Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedRemedial Action Underway: Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted: PipingSource of Cleanup Funding: 176.08599318074945682714136005Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft): Not reportedWell Name: Not reportedWater System: RODGERS, CLINTOperator: PipingLeak Source: UNKCause of Leak: Not reportedHow Leak Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Leak Discovered: 8/4/1997Date the Case was Closed: 8/4/1997Date Case Last Changed on Database: 11/1/1995Date Leak Stopped: 11/1/1995Date Confirmation Began: 4/29/1996Date Leak Record Entered: 11/1/1995Date Leak First Reported: 11/1/1995Date Leak Discovered: Not reportedEnforcement Type: MISSION DRIVECross Street: 19000Local Agency: UNKStaff: Not reportedW Global ID: T0603704579Global ID: Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site: SoilCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case No: Not reportedSubstance Quantity: HydrocarbonsSubstance: Case ClosedStatus: R-01935Facility Id: Los AngelesCounty: 04Regional Board: 4Region: LUST REG 4: 08/04/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0603704579Global Id: 11/01/1995Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651 TC6684447.2s Page 137 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName: CORTESE: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: WSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: 06-30-89Active Date: Not reportedCapacity: ATank Status: 19-000-001935-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 06-30-89Created Date: Not reportedAction Date: 06-30-89Referral Date: 44-007600Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 1935Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ROSEMEADCity: 4251 N ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName: 2Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: WSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: 06-30-89Active Date: Not reportedCapacity: ATank Status: 19-000-001935-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 06-30-89Created Date: Not reportedAction Date: 06-30-89Referral Date: 44-007600Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 1935Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ROSEMEADCity: 4251 N ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedAssigned Name: Not reportedSuspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial Use: Not reportedLocal Agency Staff: 34.0838324 / -1Lat/Long: LUSTProgram: 1985 E COVINA BLVD, COVINA CA 91724-1822RP Address: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651 TC6684447.2s Page 138 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFacility Suite: CCHARMLEStaff: Not reportedFile Status: 115.0451File Number: 4Region: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4251 N Rosemead BlvdAddress: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName: WIP: RemovedPermit Status: 00005334TPermit Number: 3PArea: RemovedFacility Status: 0Facility Type: 001860-001935Facility Id: TPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917704427City,State,Zip: 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName: ClosedPermit Status: 000000602Permit Number: 3PArea: ClosedFacility Status: 01Facility Type: 001860-I01935Facility Id: IPermit Category: LARegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 917704427City,State,Zip: 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Active OpenFile Name: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: Not reportedWID Id: Not reportedRegion 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: activeFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedOwner: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status: LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type: T0603704579Global ID: Not reportedEnvirostor Id: CORTESERegion: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651 TC6684447.2s Page 139 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06-22-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Inspected by Arturo Mico, HMS II Consent by Edgardo GalamoniziEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 01-25-2013Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 01-25-2013Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10339474CERS ID: 404650Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress: U-HAUL OF ROSEMEADName: 6264583507Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: ALHAMBRAAffiliation City: 900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: Los AngelesAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0603704579CERS ID: 224825Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName: CERS: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651 TC6684447.2s Page 140 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 91740Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: GlendoraAffiliation City: 1285 E Route 66Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: 713 MCO PresidentEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Teri RashEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Marketing Company PresidentEntity Title: Robert KelleyEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -118.073685Longitude: 34.083992Latitude: UnknownRef Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10339474Program ID: HMBPEnv Int Type Code: U-Haul of RosemeadFacility Name: 404650Site ID: Coordinates: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Adrian Zapata, Hitch ProEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-01-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division: site at time of inspection. Caesar Reyes (Assistant Manager) Observed no significant violation onEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651 TC6684447.2s Page 141 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PhoenixAffiliation City: 2727 N Central AveAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Amerco Real Estate CompanyEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (626) 859-4500Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: U-Haul of RosemeadEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 91740Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: GlendoraAffiliation City: 1285 E Route 66Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (323) 890-4000Affiliation Phone: 90040-3027Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CommerceAffiliation City: 5825 Rickenbacker RoadAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Los Angeles County FireEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: U-Haul Co of Los Angeles East.Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (626) 859-4500Affiliation Phone: 91740Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: GlendoraAffiliation City: c/o U-Haul Co. of Los Angeles East, 1285 E Route 66Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: U-Haul Co. of CaliforniaEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651 TC6684447.2s Page 142 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (602) 263-6555Affiliation Phone: 85004Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: AZAffiliation State: ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651 Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: LOS ANGELESAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: T10000002256CERS ID: 244419Site ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 820 EAST MISSION ROADAddress: KC CLEANERSName: CERS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)Potential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 115.0558RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: CMCCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -118.0898761Longitude: 34.0905111Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency: T10000002256Global Id: 07/06/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 820 EAST MISSION ROADAddress: KC CLEANERSName: CPS-SLIC: 2596 ft. 0.492 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 368 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 WNW CERS820 EAST MISSION ROAD N/A 34 CPS-SLICKC CLEANERS S110376582 TC6684447.2s Page 143 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation I-11507Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 19Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8614 VALLEYedr_fadd1: RELIABLE LUMBER INCedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: 2605 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster G 0.493 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 318 ft. 1/4-1/2 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 South 8614 VALLEY N/A G35 HIST CORTESERELIABLE LUMBER INC S104160262 Not reportedPhone Number: yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail: Los AngelesCity: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address: LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name: YUE RONGContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0603703806Global Id: 6264583507Phone Number: jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail: ALHAMBRACity: 900 S FREMONT AVEAddress: LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name: JOHN AWUJOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0603703806Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency: I-11507RB Case Number: JOACase Worker: 04/01/1993Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -118.0817649Longitude: 34.0804125Latitude: T0603703806Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603703806Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8614 VALLEY BLVD EAddress: RELIABLE LUMBER INCName: LUST: 2605 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster G 0.493 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 318 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERSROSEMEAD, CA 91770 South Cortese8614 VALLEY BLVD E N/A G36 LUSTRELIABLE LUMBER INC S105035494 TC6684447.2s Page 144 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedHow Leak Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Leak Discovered: 4/1/1993Date the Case was Closed: 3/25/1993Date Case Last Changed on Database: 3/21/1989Date Leak Stopped: 11/13/1989Date Confirmation Began: 12/5/1989Date Leak Record Entered: 11/21/1989Date Leak First Reported: 3/21/1989Date Leak Discovered: Not reportedEnforcement Type: Not reportedCross Street: 19000Local Agency: UNKStaff: Not reportedW Global ID: T0603703806Global ID: Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site: SoilCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case No: Not reportedSubstance Quantity: GasolineSubstance: Case ClosedStatus: I-11507Facility Id: Los AngelesCounty: 04Regional Board: 4Region: LUST REG 4: 04/01/1993Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0603703806Global Id: 11/13/1989Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0603703806Global Id: 03/21/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0603703806Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 11/21/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0603703806Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 03/21/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0603703806Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 03/21/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0603703806Global Id: LUST: RELIABLE LUMBER INC (Continued) S105035494 TC6684447.2s Page 145 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedWID Id: Not reportedRegion 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: activeFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedOwner: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status: LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type: T0603703806Global ID: Not reportedEnvirostor Id: CORTESERegion: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8614 VALLEY BLVD EAddress: RELIABLE LUMBER INCName: CORTESE: THEREFORE THE REGIONAL BOARD DOES NOT NEED TO ACT ON THIS CASE. THE CASE FILE INDICATES THAT THE CASE WAS CLOSED ON APRIL 1,1993.Summary: Not reportedAssigned Name: Not reportedSuspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial Use: Not reportedLocal Agency Staff: 34.0804125 / -1Lat/Long: LUSTProgram: P.O. BOX 545, ROSEMEAD, 91770RP Address: RELIABLE LUMBER INC.Responsible Party: Not reportedOwner Contact: Not reportedOrganization: Not reportedSoil Qualifier: Not reportedGW Qualifier: Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil: Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater: Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date: Not reportedEnforcement Action Date: Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedRemedial Action Underway: Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted: TankSource of Cleanup Funding: 1164.9534330746210994145568935Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft): Not reportedWell Name: Not reportedWater System: Not reportedOperator: TankLeak Source: UNKCause of Leak: RELIABLE LUMBER INC (Continued) S105035494 TC6684447.2s Page 146 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: Los AngelesAffiliation City: 320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 6264583507Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: ALHAMBRAAffiliation City: 900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0603703806CERS ID: 223597Site ID: ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip: 8614 VALLEY BLVD EAddress: RELIABLE LUMBER INCName: CERS: Active OpenFile Name: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: RELIABLE LUMBER INC (Continued) S105035494 49Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Javier HinojosaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0.16Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 304006Site Code: 08/16/2000Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 19820017Facility ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 1305/1311 SOUTH SAN GABRIEL BLVD.Address: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSIONName: ENVIROSTOR: 3051 ft. 0.578 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 340 ft. 1/2-1 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 WSW SCH1305/1311 SOUTH SAN GABRIEL BLVD. N/A 37 ENVIROSTORGABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION S105628559 TC6684447.2s Page 147 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Phase IIComments: 08/23/1999Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/07/2002Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2000Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/16/1999Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 19820017Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 304006Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 300780Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN GABRIEL USD, SO. SAN GABRIEL BLVD.Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN GABRIEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSIONAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GABRIELINO HIGH SCH AKA SAN GABRIEL USDAlias Name: SOIL, SVPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Tetrachloroethylene (PCE 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA Benzene Xylenes Zinc Toluene Ethylbenzene Trichloroethylene (TCE Selenium Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloroform 1,3,5-TrimethylbenzenePotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -118.0910Longitude: 34.08305Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 22Senate: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559 TC6684447.2s Page 148 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 19820017Facility ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 1305/1311 SOUTH SAN GABRIEL BLVD.Address: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSIONName: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Phase 1Comments: 08/23/1999Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Phase 1Comments: 09/30/1999Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: June 2000. April 13, 2000. The draft PEA report is expected to be submitted by A Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) workplan was approved onComments: 04/13/2000Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/29/1999Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/16/2000Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/15/1999Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/11/2000Completed Date: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559 TC6684447.2s Page 149 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2000Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/16/1999Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 19820017Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 304006Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 300780Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN GABRIEL USD, SO. SAN GABRIEL BLVD.Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN GABRIEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSIONAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GABRIELINO HIGH SCH AKA SAN GABRIEL USDAlias Name: SOIL, SVPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA, Benzene, 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Trichloroethylene (TCE, Tetrachloroethylene (PCE, 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, Xylenes, Zinc, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Selenium, Selenium, Dichlorodifluoromethane, Chloroform,Potential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -118.0910Longitude: 34.08305Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 08/16/2000Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 22Senate: 49Assembly: 304006Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Javier HinojosaSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 0.16Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559 TC6684447.2s Page 150 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Phase 1Comments: 08/23/1999Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Phase 1Comments: 09/30/1999Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: June 2000. April 13, 2000. The draft PEA report is expected to be submitted by A Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) workplan was approved onComments: 04/13/2000Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/29/1999Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/16/2000Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/15/1999Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/11/2000Completed Date: Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Phase IIComments: 08/23/1999Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/07/2002Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559 TC6684447.2s Page 151 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559 Approval of PEA WorkplanComments: 03/18/2008Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60000801Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 304585Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: Proposed 0.3 Acre Auto Repair Garage AcquistitionAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsConfirmed COC: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsPotential COC: EQUIPMENT/INSTRUMENT REPAIRPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -118.0910Longitude: 34.08134Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 22Senate: 49Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Angela GarciaProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0.3Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School CleanupSite Type: 304585Site Code: 11/01/2015Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 60000801Facility ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 1519 S. SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARDAddress: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITEName: ENVIROSTOR: 3605 ft. 0.683 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 331 ft. 1/2-1 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 SW SCH1519 S. SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD N/A 38 ENVIROSTORGABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE S102814385 TC6684447.2s Page 152 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 02/03/2015Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/14/2008Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Sent signed Agreement (FedEx) to District.Comments: 06/22/2009Completed Date: School Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: close it out. District has elected not to pursue this project, therefore DTSC willComments: 01/23/2012Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: lifts and UST. DTSC conducted field work oversight for the removal of the hydraulicComments: 10/06/2014Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/04/2014Completed Date: 4.15 RequestCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/28/2015Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/23/2013Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation Tech MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: a small area of PCB impacted soil. DTSC approved the PEA Report with a further action determination forComments: 04/27/2009Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE (Continued) S102814385 TC6684447.2s Page 153 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 22Senate: 49Assembly: 304585Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Angela GarciaProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 0.3Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School CleanupSite Type: 60000801Facility ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 1519 S. SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARDAddress: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITEName: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Annual cost estimate emailed and mailed to BP.Comments: 09/17/2015Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: 4/4/16; closeout complete. Closeout Form 1554 submitted on 9/10/15 and processed by CRBU onComments: 04/04/2016Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/01/2014Completed Date: Amendment - Order/AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/27/2014Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE (Continued) S102814385 TC6684447.2s Page 154 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: lifts and UST. DTSC conducted field work oversight for the removal of the hydraulicComments: 10/06/2014Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/04/2014Completed Date: 4.15 RequestCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/28/2015Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/23/2013Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation Tech MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: a small area of PCB impacted soil. DTSC approved the PEA Report with a further action determination forComments: 04/27/2009Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Approval of PEA WorkplanComments: 03/18/2008Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60000801Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 304585Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: Proposed 0.3 Acre Auto Repair Garage AcquistitionAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsConfirmed COC: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsPotential COC: EQUIPMENT/INSTRUMENT REPAIRPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -118.0910Longitude: 34.08134Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 11/01/2015Status Date: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE (Continued) S102814385 TC6684447.2s Page 155 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Annual cost estimate emailed and mailed to BP.Comments: 09/17/2015Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: 4/4/16; closeout complete. Closeout Form 1554 submitted on 9/10/15 and processed by CRBU onComments: 04/04/2016Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/01/2014Completed Date: Amendment - Order/AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/27/2014Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/03/2015Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/14/2008Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Sent signed Agreement (FedEx) to District.Comments: 06/22/2009Completed Date: School Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: close it out. District has elected not to pursue this project, therefore DTSC willComments: 01/23/2012Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE (Continued) S102814385 TC6684447.2s Page 156 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/10/2001Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/10/2002Completed Date: Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 19820032Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 304210Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033606676Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN GABRIEL USD-JEFFERSON MID SCH EXPANAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN GABRIEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSIONAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: LeadPotential COC: SCHOOL - MIDDLEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -118.0762Longitude: 34.1035Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 22Senate: 49Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Daniel ZiarkowskiSupervisor: Kamili SiglowideProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School CleanupSite Type: 304210Site Code: 04/26/2004Status Date: CertifiedStatus: 19820032Facility ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 1358/1364 - 1374 EAST LAS TUNAS DRIVEAddress: JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSIONName: ENVIROSTOR: 4991 ft. 0.945 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 412 ft. 1/2-1 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 North SCH1358/1364 - 1374 EAST LAS TUNAS DRIVE N/A 39 ENVIROSTORJEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION S105628565 TC6684447.2s Page 157 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/10/2002Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/26/2004Completed Date: Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/26/2004Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/11/2000Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/09/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/10/2002Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/25/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/26/2004Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628565 TC6684447.2s Page 158 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 19820032Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 304210Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033606676Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN GABRIEL USD-JEFFERSON MID SCH EXPANAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN GABRIEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSIONAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: LeadPotential COC: SCHOOL - MIDDLEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -118.0762Longitude: 34.1035Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 04/26/2004Status Date: CertifiedStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 22Senate: 49Assembly: 304210Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Daniel ZiarkowskiSupervisor: Kamili SiglowideProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 1Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School CleanupSite Type: 19820032Facility ID: SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip: 1358/1364 - 1374 EAST LAS TUNAS DRIVEAddress: JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSIONName: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628565 TC6684447.2s Page 159 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 12/10/2002Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/26/2004Completed Date: Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/26/2004Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/11/2000Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/09/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/10/2002Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/25/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/26/2004Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/10/2001Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/10/2002Completed Date: Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type: JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628565 TC6684447.2s Page 160 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628565 TC6684447.2s Page 161 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 3 records.ROSEMEAD S121669406ROSEMEAD EXTENDION RECYCLED WATERGARVEY AVE WALNUT GROVE AVE KL91770CIWQSROSEMEAD S121669411ROSEMEAD RETAILSWC WALNUT GROVE AVE & RUSH ST91770CIWQSROSEMEAD S127034992WALNUT GROVE AVENUE AND RUSH STREEWALNUT GROVE AVENUE AND RUSH S91770LDSTC6684447.2s Page 162 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC6684447.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC6684447.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6684447.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 08/05/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 06/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC6684447.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6684447.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6684447.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC6684447.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. Date of Government Version: 05/20/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2021 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6684447.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 06/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 06/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC6684447.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. TC6684447.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: CalEPA Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/23/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports TC6684447.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 04/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. TC6684447.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Number of Days to Update: 574 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6684447.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2021 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC6684447.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2021 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC6684447.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 251 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 96 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. TC6684447.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2021 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020 Number of Days to Update: 151 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust TC6684447.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 05/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi Telephone: 202-693-9424 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 05/05/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 06/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations TC6684447.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 06/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 05/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/05/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 04/16/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 04/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC6684447.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. TC6684447.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/11/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5810 Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. TC6684447.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored TC6684447.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility. Date of Government Version: 04/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-324-2444 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System Mineral Resources Data System Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-6533 Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS ENF: Enforcement data No description is available for this data Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2497 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging. Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 120 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PCS: Permit Compliance System PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA, Office of Water Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. TC6684447.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 06/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 06/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2021 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: TC6684447.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 12/17/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: TC6684447.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Kern County Public Health Telephone: 661-321-3000 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. TC6684447.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6684447.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 07/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 07/09/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Date of Government Version: 02/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2021 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-6973 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LOS ANGELES UST: Active & Inactive UST Inventory A listing of active & inactive underground storage tank site locations and underground storage tank historical sites, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: TC6684447.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MENDOCINO COUNTY: UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 03/24/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/3021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: TC6684447.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 03/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 04/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: TC6684447.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2021 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 06/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 06/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2021 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: TC6684447.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2021 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2020 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6684447.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/23/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/23/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: TC6684447.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SANTA CLARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/24/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6684447.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list TC6684447.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 01/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/06/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: TC6684447.2s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 04/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/23/2021 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6684447.2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2021 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 03/24/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC6684447.2s Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: Endeavor Business Media Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Endeavor Business Media This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. TC6684447.2s Page GR-51 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC6684447.2s Page GR-52 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC6684447.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5630799 EL MONTE, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 358 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3772282.2UTM Y (Meters): 400253.4UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 118.08119 - 118˚ 4’ 52.28’’Longitude (West): 34.088326 - 34˚ 5’ 17.97’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 8601 MISSION DRIVE BORNSTEIN - ROSEMEAD TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC6684447.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 358 ft. North South West East288296303303317327336343350358365376378384389396403410418371364361360359354363363359358357355351347341334329323321General SSEGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6684447.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapEL MONTE NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property Not Reported Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06037C1675F Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6684447.2s Page A-4 > 10 inchesDepth to Bedrock Max: > 10 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. Not reportedSoil Drainage Class: Not reportedHydrologic Group: variableSoil Surface Texture: URBAN LAND Soil Component Name: The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data. in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6684447.2s Page A-5 clay loam silty clay loam gravelly - fine sandy loam sand weathered bedrock very fine sandy loam stratified very gravelly - sandy loam sandy loam gravelly - sandy loamDeeper Soil Types: sand silty clay clay sandy clay loam sandy clay gravelly - loam fine sandy loamShallow Soil Types: fine sandy loam sand gravelly - sand fine sand clay silt loam gravelly - sandy loam sandy loamSurficial Soil Types: fine sandy loam sand gravelly - sand fine sand clay silt loam gravelly - sandy loam sandy loamSoil Surface Textures: appear within the general area of target property. Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Min: 0.00 Max: 0.00 Min: 0.00 Max: 0.00Not reportedNot reportedvariable 6 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Permeability Rate (in/hr) Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6684447.2s Page A-6 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1345 D18 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1460 D17 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECADWR0000028853 15 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWCADDW0000022751 D14 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWCADDW0000007807 D13 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWCADDW0000009937 D12 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWCADDW0000015184 D11 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWCADDW0000015013 C10 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW1466 C9 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthCAPFAS000001581 A7 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthCADDW0000008556 A6 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECADDW0000006517 A4 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECADDW0000005750 B3 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. 1/2 - 1 Mile SECA1900009 39 FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile NWUSGS40000141018 J45 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEUSGS40000140771 F30 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWUSGS40000140874 C26 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWUSGS40000140888 C16 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWUSGS40000140873 C8 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNEUSGS40000140901 B5 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthUSGS40000140902 A2 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNWUSGS40000140887 1 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6684447.2s Page A-7 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADWR0000009716 48 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADDW0000004164 H47 1/2 - 1 Mile NW1465 J46 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE1384 I44 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE1383 I43 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE1382 I42 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADDW0000010906 H41 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADDW0000007016 H40 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000128204 G38 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000018727 G37 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000059464 G36 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000140551 G35 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000119179 G34 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000082364 G33 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000057008 G32 1/2 - 1 Mile ESECADDW0000007554 F31 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWCADDW0000018640 29 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWCADWR0000016234 E28 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWCADWR0000029756 E27 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESECADWR0000021278 25 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNWCADWR0000005621 24 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1462 D23 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1463 D22 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1464 D21 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1461 D20 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1344 D19 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 4 8 0 4 8 0 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 0 40 0 400 4 0 0 4 0 0 360 3 6 0 3603 6 0 3 6032032032 03203 20 320 280 28028 0 CA TC6684447.2s Page A-9 Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 001S011W07N002SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: B5 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS40000140901FED USGS A4 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADDW0000006517CA WELLS B3 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADDW0000005750CA WELLS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 578Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 578Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 001S011W07N001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: A2 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS40000140902FED USGS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 340Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 340Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 001S012W13A001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: 1 NNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher USGS40000140887FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-10 8559Connection:45000Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip: CAState:ROSEMEADCity: P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname: San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: ARStatus:2Precision: 1180509.0Longitude:340525.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INAKEStation ty:WELL 12Source nam: GWater type:1910144System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910144010Frds no: 01S/12W-13B04 SPrim sta c:1466Seq: C9 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 1466CA WELLS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 339Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 339Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 001S012W13B001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: C8 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS40000140873FED USGS A7 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CAPFAS000001581CA WELLS A6 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADDW0000008556CA WELLS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 670Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 670Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-11 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:03-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 190.Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.96Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 6.2Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 4.5Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.8Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.9Finding:07-NOV-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.9Finding:05-DEC-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:03-JAN-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.77Finding:11-JAN-18Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:06-FEB-18Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:06-MAR-18Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5Finding:03-APR-18Sample date: SAN GABRIELArea serve: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-12 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.9Finding:06-SEP-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:04-OCT-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.86Finding:19-OCT-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.9Finding:01-NOV-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:06-DEC-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:03-JAN-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5Finding:11-JAN-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6Finding:08-FEB-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.4Finding:07-MAR-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6Finding:11-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.74Finding:13-APR-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:02-MAY-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:06-JUN-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:03-JUL-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:17-JUL-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.1Finding:02-AUG-17Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-13 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5Finding:05-APR-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical: 0.47Finding:13-APR-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 0.782Finding:13-APR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.63Finding:13-APR-16Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 1.8Finding:13-APR-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.573Finding:13-APR-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.2Finding:13-APR-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.504Finding:13-APR-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.231Finding:13-APR-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6Finding:04-MAY-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.9Finding:05-JUL-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200.Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.9Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:02-AUG-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-14 MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 38.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 7.2Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 27.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 98.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 170.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 140.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.6Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 350.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical: 21.67Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 8.3Finding:07-JUL-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.74Finding:16-JUL-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.7Finding:04-AUG-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.4Finding:06-OCT-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:09-OCT-15Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.4Finding:13-JAN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.73Finding:13-JAN-16Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-15 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6Finding:03-FEB-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6Finding:03-MAR-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.Finding:07-APR-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.Finding:04-MAY-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.4Finding:02-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.93Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 11.57Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.7Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical: 0.38Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 140.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.83Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 16.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 8.9Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.1Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-16 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.2Finding:06-MAY-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.Finding:01-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.2Finding:05-AUG-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.9Finding:02-SEP-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.7Finding:07-OCT-14Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.88Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.1Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 3.9Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.84Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210.Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.4Finding:01-DEC-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.1Finding:06-JAN-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.8Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.61Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-17 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200.Finding:13-AUG-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 5.Finding:13-AUG-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.5Finding:03-SEP-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 5.3Finding:26-SEP-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.1Finding:01-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.73Finding:15-OCT-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5Finding:05-NOV-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.1Finding:03-DEC-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.8Finding:07-JAN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.6Finding:09-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.57Finding:09-JAN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.1Finding:04-FEB-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.3Finding:04-MAR-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6Finding:01-APR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.53Finding:08-APR-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-18 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.8Finding:06-JUN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.2Finding:03-JUL-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5Finding:07-AUG-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8Finding:04-SEP-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9Finding:07-NOV-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.5Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.6Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 2.6Finding:09-JAN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 2.9Finding:05-FEB-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.5Finding:05-MAR-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.8Finding:02-APR-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4Finding:07-MAY-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.5Finding:04-JUN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.5Finding:02-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.9Finding:06-AUG-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-19 0.Dlr: CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical: 23.78Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 310.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.7Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 140.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 170.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 11.51Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.8Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical: 0.32Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 180.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.92Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 16.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 8.5Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 5.1Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 18.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 67.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-20 15 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADWR0000028853CA WELLS D14 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000022751CA WELLS D13 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000007807CA WELLS D12 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000009937CA WELLS D11 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000015184CA WELLS C10 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADDW0000015013CA WELLS 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.1Finding:07-FEB-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 2.9Finding:06-MAR-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.2Finding:04-APR-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 2.9Finding:01-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 43.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-21 Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: ARStatus:8Precision: 1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:1948 - GRANDSource nam: GWater type:1910139System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910139010Frds no: 01S/11W-07N02 SPrim sta c:1345Seq: D18 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 1345CA WELLS SAN GABRIELArea serve: 8559Connection:45000Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip: CAState:ROSEMEADCity: P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname: San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: IUStatus:8Precision: 1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 10 - INACTIVESource nam: GWater type:1910144System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910144008Frds no: 01S/12W-12K01 SPrim sta c:1460Seq: D17 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 1460CA WELLS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 883Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 800Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 001S012W13B003SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: C16 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS40000140888FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-22 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:01-MAR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:01-MAR-17Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 9.6Finding:01-MAR-17Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:08-JUN-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:08-JUN-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:08-JUN-17Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220.Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.8Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:05-DEC-17Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:05-DEC-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:05-DEC-17Sample date: SAN MARINOArea serve: 13902Connection:49353Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91108Zip: CAState:SAN MARINOCity: 2020 HUNTINGTON DRIVEAddress:CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COHqname: Cal. American Water Co.-San MarinoSystem nam:1910139System no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-23 MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 190.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 140.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 39.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 11.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 23.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.2Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 8.5Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 17.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.78Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 230.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical: 0.96Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.4Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:05-DEC-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.78Finding:05-DEC-16Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-24 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical: 0.47Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.48Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical: 0.28Finding:15-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 9.9e-002Finding:15-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.73Finding:15-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:07-SEP-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.9Finding:07-SEP-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.88Finding:07-SEP-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.26Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CARBON DIOXIDEChemical: 2500.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 380.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.1Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-25 UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 168.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 10.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM (TOTAL)Chemical: 12.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical: 28.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.85Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 18.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 8.9Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.53Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 39.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 11.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 24.1Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 6.9e-002Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.253Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-26 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:01-SEP-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:01-SEP-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.69Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 8.1Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220.Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:15-SEP-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:05-OCT-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:05-OCT-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.99Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.74Finding:02-MAR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:02-MAR-16Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:25-MAY-16Sample date: 100.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-27 MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.82Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 17.4Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical: 28.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 189.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 10.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM (TOTAL)Chemical: 13.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.75Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.6Finding:01-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:01-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:04-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:06-JUL-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.9Finding:06-JUL-15Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 9.7Finding:28-JUL-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:05-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:05-AUG-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-28 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:02-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.78Finding:05-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:05-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:06-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:06-APR-15Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.72Finding:08-APR-15Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 9.81Finding:23-APR-15Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:23-APR-15Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:27-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:04-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:04-MAY-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 11.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 23.2Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 8.9Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 39.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-29 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:06-OCT-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:03-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:03-NOV-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 11.12Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:01-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:01-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:03-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.69Finding:03-DEC-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.Finding:04-DEC-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 9.93Finding:04-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:05-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:05-JAN-15Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 10.21Finding:26-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:02-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.6Finding:02-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:02-MAR-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-30 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 140.Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 9.8Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.3Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.9Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:04-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:04-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:02-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:02-SEP-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.3Finding:03-SEP-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220.Finding:03-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:03-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.73Finding:03-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:06-OCT-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-31 MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical: 31.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.88Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 19.8Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 10.3Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 21.1Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 14.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.96Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.9Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 140.Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.9Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.2Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 9.9Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 380.Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 380.Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-32 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.72Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.Finding:14-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:14-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.Finding:14-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:14-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 46.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2100.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.29Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 10.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM (TOTAL)Chemical: 12.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 197.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-33 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CARBON DIOXIDEChemical: 4700.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 140.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 180.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.8Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 370.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.34Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 39.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.6Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-34 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.9Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 11.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 22.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.4Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 8.2Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 17.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.84Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 9.8Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical: 0.7Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1600.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-35 MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical: 27.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 189.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 10.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM (TOTAL)Chemical: 11.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.6Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.79Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 2.8Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.18Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-36 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.72Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:08-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:08-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 20.8Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1600.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.89Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.6Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 40.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 11.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 8.7Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 17.5Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.87Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-37 UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.96Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.9Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.78Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.6Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.6Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-38 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.85Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.3Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 240.Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 40.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 12.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 23.1Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 8.8Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 17.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.86Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical: 29.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 195.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-39 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.36Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.36Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.41Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.71Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.9Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-40 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.6Finding:13-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:13-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:13-MAY-14Sample date: SAN MARINOArea serve: 13902Connection:49353Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91108Zip: CAState:SAN MARINOCity: 2020 HUNTINGTON DRIVEAddress:CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COHqname: Cal. American Water Co.-San MarinoSystem nam:1910139System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: ARStatus:8Precision: 1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:ROSEMEAD (1957)Source nam: GWater type:1910139System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910139014Frds no: 01S/11W-07N01 SPrim sta c:1344Seq: D19 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 1344CA WELLS 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.7Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.34Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.8Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-41 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:05-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:05-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:05-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 27.4Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 23.4Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 17.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 53.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.98Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical: 32.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 148.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29.25Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 6600.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 17.6Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:13-MAY-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-42 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38.Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:05-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-43 MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 200.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 160.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.8Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 500.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 290.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical: 0.85Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CARBON DIOXIDEChemical: 4800.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 4.7Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 52.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-44 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36.Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 7.2Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.93Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 26.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 18.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.5Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 25.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 17.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 8300.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 200.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-45 PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 3.1Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.6e-002Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 3.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical: 3.11Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31.Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.297Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-46 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 22.9Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 16.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 50.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.35Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 16.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-47 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.2Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:08-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:08-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:08-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:08-APR-13Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 157.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical: 30.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.99Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 25.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 6400.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-48 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 30.Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-49 MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 24.6Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 15.7Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 23.3Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.99Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical: 32.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 161.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-50 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.2Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 290.Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 26.29Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 51.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 17.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-51 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.71Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.4Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.6Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23.Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-52 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.96Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.2Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.2Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.89Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.43Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-53 CAState:ROSEMEADCity: P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname: San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: IRStatus:8Precision: 1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 06 - INACTIVESource nam: GWater type:1910144System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910144004Frds no: 01S/12W-13B02 SPrim sta c:1464Seq: D21 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 1464CA WELLS SAN MARINOArea serve: 13902Connection:49353Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91108Zip: CAState:SAN MARINOCity: 2020 HUNTINGTON DRIVEAddress:CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COHqname: Cal. American Water Co.-San MarinoSystem nam:1910139System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: ARStatus:8Precision: 1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:RICHARDSON WELL 01Source nam: GWater type:1910139System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910139025Frds no: 01S/12W-13A01 SPrim sta c:1461Seq: D20 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 1461CA WELLS 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.1Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.4Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.1Finding:22-MAR-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-54 24 NNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADWR0000005621CA WELLS SAN MARINOArea serve: 13902Connection:49353Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91108Zip: CAState:SAN MARINOCity: 2020 HUNTINGTON DRIVEAddress:CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COHqname: Cal. American Water Co.-San MarinoSystem nam:1910139System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: IUStatus:5Precision: 1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation ty:RICHARDSON WELL 02 - INACTIVESource nam: GWater type:1910139System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910139028Frds no: 01S/12W-13A02 SPrim sta c:1462Seq: D23 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 1462CA WELLS SAN GABRIELArea serve: 8559Connection:45000Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip: CAState:ROSEMEADCity: P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname: San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: ARStatus:8Precision: 1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 05Source nam: GWater type:1910144System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910144003Frds no: 01S/12W-13B01 SPrim sta c:1463Seq: D22 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 1463CA WELLS SAN GABRIELArea serve: 8559Connection:45000Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-55 ftWell Hole Depth Units: 403Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 403Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 001S011W18K001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: F30 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000140771FED USGS 29 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADDW0000018640CA WELLS E28 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADWR0000016234CA WELLS E27 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADWR0000029756CA WELLS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 401Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 363Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 001S012W13B002SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: C26 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS40000140874FED USGS 25 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADWR0000021278CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-56 PrivateOwner: CWSPwstype: Purch_surface_waterPsource longname: 173Pwssvcconn: 300Retpopsrvd: ActiveStatus: 06037Fipscounty: Not ReportedZipserved: CAStateserved: Not ReportedCityserved: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPwsname: CA1900009Pwsid: CAState: 09Epa region: 39 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CA1900009FRDS PWS G38 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAEDF0000128204CA WELLS G37 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAEDF0000018727CA WELLS G36 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAEDF0000059464CA WELLS G35 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAEDF0000140551CA WELLS G34 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAEDF0000119179CA WELLS G33 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAEDF0000082364CA WELLS G32 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAEDF0000057008CA WELLS F31 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000007554CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-57 10/27/2004Enforcement Action: 2005Enforcemnt FY: SOrig Code: 0412001Violation ID: Not ReportedCmp edt: 07/01/1993Cmp bdt: 0State mcl: Not ReportedUnit of measure: 0Violation measur: LCRRule name: 350Rule code: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation name: 51Violation code: Lead and Copper RuleContamination Name: 5000Contamination code: 1993Violation Year: CAState: FOrig code: 95V0001Violation id: 01/31/2005Cmp edt: 01/01/2005Cmp bdt: Not ReportedState mcl: Not ReportedUnit of measure: Not ReportedViolation measur: TCRRule name: 110Rule code: MCL, Monthly (TCR)Violation name: 22Violation code: Coliform (TCR)Contamination Name: 3100Contamination code: 2005Violation Year: CAState: SOrig code: 0504001Violation id: 09/30/2004Cmp edt: 09/01/2004Cmp bdt: Not ReportedState mcl: Not ReportedUnit of measure: Not ReportedViolation measur: TCRRule name: 110Rule code: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)Violation name: 23Violation code: Coliform (TCR)Contamination Name: 3100Contamination code: 2004Violation Year: CAState: SOrig code: 0412001Violation id: 1180418Longitude: 340450Latitude: UntreatedTreatment: 101 - 500 PersonsPopulation served: 91770System zip: CASystem state: ROSEMEADSystem city: 9267 E. RIO DOLLSystem address: ADAM RANCH MUTUAL WATER CO.System address: ADAM RANCH MUTUAL WATER CO.System name: 00000500Retail population: Not ReportedDate system deactivated: 7706Date system activated: ActiveActivity status: CA1900009PWS ID: Not ReportedContact telephone: 6263508181Contact zip: 91Contact state: CAContact city: ROSEMEADContact address: 9238-46 LOWER AZUSA RD.Contact address: Dominic CimarustiContact: 300Retail population served: CPWS type code: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name: 91770PWS zip: CAPWS state: ROSEMEADPWS city: Not ReportedPWS address: ADAM RANCH MUTUAL WATER CO.PWS name: System Owner/Responsible PartyPWS type: CA1900009PWS ID: 300Population: Purchased ground waterSource code: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALOwner: 91770Zip: CAState: ROSEMEADECity: Not ReportedCare of: Not ReportedAddress: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name: CA1900009PWS ID: APwsactivitycode: 91770Contactzip: CAContactstate: ROSEMEADContactcity: Not ReportedContactaddress2: 9238-46 LOWER AZUSA RD.Contactaddress1: 6263508181Contactphone: CA1900009-ADAMS RANCH MUTUALContactorgname: DOMINIC _CIMARUSTIContact: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-58 P.O. BOX 9016Address:SOUTHERN CALIF WATER COHqname: Scwc-South ArcadiaSystem nam:1910212System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: SRStatus:8Precision: 1180400.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:ENCINITAS WELL 02 - STANDBYSource nam: GWater type:1910212System no: METUser id:15District: 19County:1910212003Frds no: 01S/11W-18A04 SPrim sta c:1382Seq: I42 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 1382CA WELLS H41 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000010906CA WELLS H40 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000007016CA WELLS 0Violation measurement: 7/8/2009 0:00:00Enforcement action: No Enf Action as ofEnforcement date: 12/31/2025 0:00:00Compliance end date: 7/1/1993 0:00:00Compliance start date: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation type: LEAD & COPPER RULEContaminant: 95V0001Violation ID: CPWS type code: 300Population served: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name: Not ReportedViolation measurement: State AO (w/o Penalty) IssuedEnforcement action: 3/25/2005 0:00:00Enforcement date: 1/31/2005 0:00:00Compliance end date: 1/1/2005 0:00:00Compliance start date: Max Contaminant Level, Monthly (TCR)Violation type: COLIFORM (TCR)Contaminant: 0504001Violation ID: CPWS type code: 300Population served: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name: Not ReportedViolation measurement: State AO (w/o Penalty) IssuedEnforcement action: 10/27/2004 0:00:00Enforcement date: 9/30/2004 0:00:00Compliance end date: 9/1/2004 0:00:00Compliance start date: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)Violation type: COLIFORM (TCR)Contaminant: 0412001Violation ID: CPWS type code: 300Population served: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name: FormalEnforcement Category: St AO (w/o penalty) issuedEnforcement Detail: 03/25/2005Enforcement Action: 2005Enforcemnt FY: SOrig Code: 0504001Violation ID: FormalEnforcement Category: St AO (w/o penalty) issuedEnforcement Detail: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-59 4.4Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.3Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.4Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.4Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.4Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date: Not ReportedArea serve: 6980Connection:23034Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91773Zip: CAState:SAN DIMASCity: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-60 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:10-JUL-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:07-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:07-AUG-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.1Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.72Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 7.9Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 240.Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.9Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-61 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.4Finding:09-JAN-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.9Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.Finding:16-MAR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:16-MAR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:10-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:10-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:08-MAY-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:08-MAY-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.1Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:10-JUL-17Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-62 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.3Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 240.Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.1Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.1Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.9Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.2Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:09-JAN-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-63 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:11-APR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.3Finding:11-APR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:10-MAY-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:10-MAY-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.7Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.6Finding:14-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:14-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.6Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-64 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.9Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.9Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:11-JAN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.3Finding:11-JAN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.7Finding:08-FEB-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:08-FEB-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.1Finding:08-FEB-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.1Finding:17-FEB-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:17-FEB-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.6Finding:17-FEB-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-65 Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical: 0.35Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 250.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.67Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 23.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 11.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.3Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 23.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 10.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.91Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 170.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 210.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 140.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 41.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.5Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.1Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-66 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.4Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 17.Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.4Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.9Finding:13-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.178Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.606Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.2Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical: 0.14Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units: RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical: 0.47Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.7Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.e-002Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 400.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-67 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.2Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.4Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.2Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 16.Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.2Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.7Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.4Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.1Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 14.Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.2Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-68 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.1Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.1Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 7.Finding:17-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:17-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.2Finding:17-NOV-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.3Finding:17-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.9Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.9Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-69 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.4Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:07-APR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.7Finding:07-APR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.3Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.9Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.3Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.6Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.6Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.6Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.68Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-70 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:08-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.8Finding:12-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:12-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.2Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 8.2Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.9Finding:09-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:09-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:13-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:13-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 16.Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.2Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-71 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.1Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.8Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.4Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 250.Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.4Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.3Finding:08-OCT-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-72 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.77Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.9Finding:10-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:10-DEC-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:08-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.Finding:08-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.3Finding:12-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:12-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.9Finding:21-FEB-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.7Finding:21-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:21-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:12-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.6Finding:12-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:09-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.7Finding:09-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-73 MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 25.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.5Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 10.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 20.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.71Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical: 1.1Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 250.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.9Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.8Finding:11-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:11-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.7Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:13-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.3Finding:13-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-74 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:16-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.8Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 2.4Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical: 21.1Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 420.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, FIELDChemical: 8.04Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.04Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 160.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 200.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 42.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 10.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-75 UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 8.Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.4Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.3Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:10-APR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.6Finding:10-APR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.1Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.2Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.9Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.8Finding:12-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:12-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.9Finding:16-JUL-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-76 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.86Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.9Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.66Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date: Not ReportedArea serve: 6980Connection:23034Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91773Zip: CAState:SAN DIMASCity: P.O. BOX 9016Address:SOUTHERN CALIF WATER COHqname: Scwc-South ArcadiaSystem nam:1910212System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: SRStatus:8Precision: 1180400.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:ENCINITAS WELL 01 - STANDBYSource nam: GWater type:1910212System no: METUser id:15District: 19County:1910212002Frds no: 01S/11W-18A05 SPrim sta c:1383Seq: I43 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 1383CA WELLS 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-77 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.9Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.9Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.4Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.8Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.4Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.9Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.96Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-78 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.5Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.69Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:16-MAR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:16-MAR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:10-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:10-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:23-AUG-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.4Finding:23-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:23-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.2Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 240.Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-79 PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 2.4Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.97Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 240.Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.4Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.81Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.3Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.97Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-80 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:11-JAN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:11-JAN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.9Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.95Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.74Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 7.6Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.7Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.87Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.6Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date: 1.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-81 MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 9.6Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 21.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.73Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 250.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical: 0.4Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 190.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:12-OCT-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.2Finding:12-OCT-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.1Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.1Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-82 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23.Finding:13-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 22.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 11.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 40.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 230.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.92Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 390.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.3Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-83 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.4Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.8Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.4Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.75Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-84 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.9Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 260.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.9Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 7.5Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.9Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.96Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-85 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.1Finding:10-MAR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:10-MAR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.6Finding:07-APR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:07-APR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.93Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.3Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.6Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.2Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.2Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.4Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-86 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:08-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.9Finding:08-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:12-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.8Finding:12-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.7Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:09-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.Finding:09-DEC-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:13-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:13-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.3Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-87 UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.4Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.8Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.9Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.4Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.74Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.94Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.4Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 260.Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-88 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:11-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:11-SEP-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.3Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:13-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.8Finding:13-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.83Finding:28-FEB-13Sample date: 4.Dlr: UG/LReport units:PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7Finding:28-FEB-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:19-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.88Finding:19-MAR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.9Finding:09-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:09-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-89 USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 440.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical: 1.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 260.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.83Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 22.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 20.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.6Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, FIELDChemical: 7.98Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.98Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 160.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 200.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 170.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 45.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 13.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 22.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-90 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.91Finding:10-APR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:10-APR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.84Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.4Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.2Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:12-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.5Finding:12-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.1Finding:16-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:16-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.83Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.93Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.9Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical: 22.2Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-91 Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: ARStatus:8Precision: 1180400.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:ENCINITAS WELL 03Source nam: GWater type:1910212System no: METUser id:15District: 19County:1910212004Frds no: 01S/11W-18A06 SPrim sta c:1384Seq: I44 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 1384CA WELLS 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.93Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.98Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.76Finding:16-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:16-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.89Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-92 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.1Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 16.Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.4Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.8Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 17.Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 14.Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.6Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.6Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 15.Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.2Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 16.Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.7Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date: Not ReportedArea serve: 6980Connection:23034Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91773Zip: CAState:SAN DIMASCity: P.O. BOX 9016Address:SOUTHERN CALIF WATER COHqname: Scwc-South ArcadiaSystem nam:1910212System no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-93 UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:10-JUL-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:07-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:07-AUG-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.7Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 7.8Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 280.Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.85Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.6Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.2Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.1Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 15.Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.3Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-94 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.5Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.2Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.8Finding:24-MAR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 19.Finding:24-MAR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.8Finding:10-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 17.Finding:10-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:08-MAY-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:08-MAY-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.6Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.7Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 3.1Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:10-JUL-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-95 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.5Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.1Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.2Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 14.Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.7Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.4Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 14.Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:09-JAN-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:09-JAN-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-96 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 180.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 46.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 15.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 20.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 13.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 22.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.77Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 280.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical: 0.54Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.1Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-97 UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.9Finding:11-APR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 14.Finding:11-APR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.5Finding:10-MAY-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:10-MAY-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.7Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.6Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.6Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 460.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.01Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 180.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 220.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.1Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-98 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.5Finding:12-OCT-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:12-OCT-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.1Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.1Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.5Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.8Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.8Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.4Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-99 UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.3Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.6Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.3Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 25.Finding:13-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.6Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.5Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 270.Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.1Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-100 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 7.1Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.7Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.5Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.4Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.5Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.3Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.2Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.4Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.9Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.6Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.4Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-101 PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.6e-002Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.3Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.4Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.73Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 16.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 270.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.2Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.5Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-102 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.7Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 20.Finding:07-APR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.Finding:07-APR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.7Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.2Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 17.Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 6.Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.28Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units: RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical: 0.418Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical: 0.276Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.2Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.547Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-103 NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 10.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.37Finding:29-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 10.Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.2Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.1Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.5Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 280.Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 12.Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 4.7Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 15.Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 17.Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-104 0.Dlr: UNITSReport units:COLORChemical: 2.5Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 450.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.64Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 170.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 200.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 170.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 45.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 13.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 19.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 16.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 25.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.78Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 290.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical: 0.1Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-105 UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.8Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:10-APR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.4Finding:10-APR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.6Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 9.2Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.7Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.6Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 11.Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 13.Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 5.1Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.4Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-106 SAN GABRIELArea serve: 8559Connection:45000Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip: CAState:ROSEMEADCity: P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname: San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: ARStatus:3Precision: 1180520.0Longitude:340555.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 11Source nam: GWater type:1910144System no: 4THUser id:07District: 19County:1910144009Frds no: 01S/12W-13B03 SPrim sta c:1465Seq: J46 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 1465CA WELLS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 827Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 821Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 001S012W12K001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: J45 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000141018FED USGS 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 8.4Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.8Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 7.7Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-107 MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 220.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 58.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 19.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 28.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.6Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 20.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 38.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.79Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 140.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 340.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical: 0.79Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical: 0.18Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 12.01Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.6Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 14.Finding:11-JAN-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.9Finding:11-JAN-18Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-108 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 13.Finding:11-JAN-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.9Finding:11-JAN-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 13.Finding:13-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.8Finding:13-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.7Finding:17-JUL-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 14.Finding:17-JUL-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 3.1Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 14.Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 350.Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 220.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 180.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 570.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical: 19.7Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 14.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-109 MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29.Finding:04-MAY-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.32Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 3.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical: 5.79Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 7.3Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.63Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 13.Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.2Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical: 0.47Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.436Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.183Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226Chemical: 7.6e-002Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 4.e-002Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 5.e-003Dlr: UG/LReport units:1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANEChemical: 9.2e-003Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 340.Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 12.Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-110 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 24.Finding:05-AUG-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 24.Finding:02-SEP-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 24.Finding:07-OCT-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.2Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 270.Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23.Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32.Finding:01-DEC-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 27.Finding:06-JAN-15Sample date: 5.e-003Dlr: UG/LReport units:1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANEChemical: 8.e-003Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.6Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 42.Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.Finding:03-FEB-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.Finding:17-FEB-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.Finding:03-MAR-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 27.Finding:07-APR-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-111 UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:15-OCT-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 27.Finding:05-NOV-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29.Finding:03-DEC-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 27.Finding:07-JAN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 27.Finding:09-JAN-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:09-JAN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37.Finding:04-FEB-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.Finding:04-MAR-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28.Finding:01-APR-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.7Finding:08-APR-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 25.Finding:08-APR-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 24.Finding:06-MAY-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 26.Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23.Finding:01-JUL-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23.Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-112 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:02-APR-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 2.7Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.5Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 25.Finding:07-MAY-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22.Finding:04-JUN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:02-JUL-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:06-AUG-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 260.Finding:13-AUG-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 5.5Finding:13-AUG-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22.Finding:03-SEP-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 5.7Finding:26-SEP-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:01-OCT-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-113 MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 39.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:03-JUL-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.88Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.3Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:07-AUG-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:04-SEP-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.6Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22.Finding:07-NOV-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 1.8Finding:09-JAN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:09-JAN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:05-FEB-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:05-MAR-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-114 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 30.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.1Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 12.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 22.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.86Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 250.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical: 0.41Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 20.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 11.61Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 12.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical: 21.56Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 410.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.4Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 170.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 200.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-115 48 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR0000009716CA WELLS H47 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000004164CA WELLS 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 27.Finding:04-JAN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31.Finding:17-JAN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.Finding:17-JAN-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.78Finding:17-JAN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:07-FEB-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:06-MAR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 2.3Finding:18-APR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical: 0.68Finding:18-APR-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 30.Finding:18-APR-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21.Finding:01-MAY-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6684447.2s Page A-116 0%0%100%0.933 pCi/LBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%2%98%0.711 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 63 Federal Area Radon Information for LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for LOS ANGELES County: 2 21191770 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC6684447.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5577 The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources, Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local Groundwater Projects. Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. California Earthquake Fault Lines Source: California Division of Mines and Geology The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-210-8558 Radon Database for California TC6684447.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC6684447.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Appendix E Historical Records October 6, 2021 Project No.: 185805355 E.1 Appendix E HISTORICAL RECORDS Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 September 30, 2021 6684447.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 09/30/21 8601 Mission Drive Bornstein - Rosemead Stantec 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 Rosemead, CA 91770 6684447.3 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 Josh Sargent The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Stantec were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. B194-4226-B870 185805355 UNMAPPED PROPERTY Bornstein - Rosemead This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: B194-4226-B870 Stantec (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6684447 3 2 EDR Historical Topo Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com with QuadMatch™ Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 September 30, 2021 6684447.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report EDR Inquiry # Search Results: P.O.# Project: Maps Provided: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Contact: Site Name: Client Name: 2012 1994 1991 1981 1972 1966 1953 1948 1926, 1928 1923, 1924 1900 1896 1894 09/30/21 Bornstein - Rosemead Stantec 8601 Mission Drive 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 Rosemead, CA 91770 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 6684447.4 Josh Sargent EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Stantec were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. 185805355 34.088326 34° 5' 18" North Bornstein - Rosemead -118.08119 -118° 4' 52" West Zone 11 North 400255.69 3772476.96 357.08' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6684447 4 2 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 2012 Source Sheets 2012 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 1994 Source Sheets 1994 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1978 1991 Source Sheets 1991 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1978 1981 Source Sheets 1981 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1978 6684447 4 3 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1972 Source Sheets 1972 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1966 Source Sheets 1966 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1964 1953 Source Sheets 1953 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1952 1948 Source Sheets 1948 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 6684447 4 4 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1926, 1928 Source Sheets 1926 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 1926 Alhambra 7.5-minute, 24000 1928 Altadena 7.5-minute, 24000 1928 Sierra Madre 7.5-minute, 24000 1923, 1924 Source Sheets 1923 El Monte 7.5-minute, 24000 1924 Alhambra 7.5-minute, 24000 1900 Source Sheets 1900 Pasadena 15-minute, 62500 1900 Los Angeles 15-minute, 62500 1896 Source Sheets 1896 Pasadena 15-minute, 62500 6684447 4 5 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1894 Source Sheets 1894 Los Angeles 15-minute, 62500 6684447 4 6 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 2012, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 7 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1994 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1994, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 8 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1991 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1991, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 9 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1981 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1981, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 10 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1972 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1972, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 11 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1966 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1966, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 12 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1953 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1953, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 13 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1948 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1948, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 14 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1926, 1928 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1926, 7.5-minute NE, Sierra Madre, 1928, 7.5-minute SW, Alhambra, 1926, 7.5-minute NW, Altadena, 1928, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 15 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1923, 1924 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, El Monte, 1923, 7.5-minute SW, Alhambra, 1924, 7.5-minute 6684447 4 16 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1900 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, Pasadena, 1900, 15-minute TP, Los Angeles, 1900, 15-minute 6684447 4 17 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1896 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, Pasadena, 1896, 15-minute 6684447 4 18 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1894 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Stantec TP, Los Angeles, 1894, 15-minute 6684447 4 19 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Inquiry Number: September 30, 2021 6684447.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 2016 1"=500'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2002 1"=500'Flight Date: June 11, 2002 USDA 1994 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1994 USGS/DOQQ 1989 1"=500'Flight Date: August 22, 1989 USDA 1981 1"=500'Flight Date: February 17, 1981 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific 1979 1"=500'Flight Date: May 11, 1979 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific 1977 1"=500'Flight Date: April 25, 1977 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific 1964 1"=500'Flight Date: July 28, 1964 USGS 1952 1"=500'Flight Date: August 02, 1952 USGS 1948 1"=500'Flight Date: July 10, 1948 USGS 1938 1"=500'Flight Date: May 06, 1938 USDA 1928 1"=500'Flight Date: January 01, 1928 FAIR EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 09/30/21 Bornstein - Rosemead Site Name:Client Name: Stantec 8601 Mission Drive 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 Rosemead, CA 91770 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 EDR Inquiry #6684447.8 Contact:Josh Sargent Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 6684447 8-page 2 6684447.8 2016 = 500' 6684447.8 2012 = 500' 6684447.8 2009 = 500' 6684447.8 2005 = 500' 6684447.8 2002 = 500' 6684447.8 1994 = 500' 6684447.8 1989 = 500' 6684447.8 1981 = 500' 6684447.8 1979 = 500' 6684447.8 1977 = 500' 6684447.8 1964 = 500' 6684447.8 1952 = 500' 6684447.8 1948 = 500' 6684447.8 1938 = 500' 6684447.8 1928 = 500' Bornstein - Rosemead 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 Inquiry Number: 6684447.5 September 30, 2021 The EDR-City Directory Abstract 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2015. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property. A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 2015 Cole Information Services -X X - 2009 Cole Information Services -X X - 2006 Haines Company -X X - 2004 Cole Information Services -X X - Haines Company ---- 2003 Haines & Company ---- 2001 Haines & Company, Inc.---- 2000 Pacific Bell Telephone ---- 1999 Cole Information Services -X X - Haines Company -X X - 6684447-5 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 1996 GTE ---- 1995 Pacific Bell -X X - 1994 Cole Information Services -X X - 1992 PACIFIC BELL WHITE PAGES ---- 1991 Pacific Bell ---- 1990 PACIFIC BELL WHITE PAGES ---- 1986 Pacific Bell -X X - 1985 Pacific Bell -X X - Pacific Bell X X X - 1981 Pacific Telephone -X X - 1980 Pacific Telephone -X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1976 Pacific Telephone -X X - 1975 Pacific Telephone -X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1972 R. L. Polk & Co.---- 1971 Pacific Telephone -X X - 1970 Pacific Telephone ---- 1969 Pacific Telephone ---- 1967 R. L. Polk & Co.---- 1966 Pacific Telephone -X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1965 GTE ---- 1964 Pacific Telephone ---- 1963 Pacific Telephone ---- 1962 Pacific Telephone ---- 1961 R. L. Polk & Co.---- 1960 Pacific Telephone -X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1958 Pacific Telephone ---- 1957 Pacific Telephone -X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1956 Pacific Telephone ---- 1955 R. L. Polk & Co.---- 1954 R. L. Polk & Co.---- 1952 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1951 Los Angeles Directory Co Publishers ---- 1950 Pacific Telephone ---- 6684447-5 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 1949 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1948 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1947 Pacific Directory Co.---- 1946 Southern California Telephone Co ---- 1945 The Glendale Directory Co.---- 1944 R. L. Polk & Co.---- 1942 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1940 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1939 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1938 Los Angeles Directory Company Publishers ---- 1937 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1936 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1935 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1934 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1933 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1932 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1931 Los Angeles Directory Company Publishers ---- 1930 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1929 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1928 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1927 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1926 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1925 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1924 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1923 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1921 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 1920 Los Angeles Directory Co.---- 6684447-5 Page 3 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 FINDINGS DETAIL Target Property research detail. MISSION DR 8601 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 1985 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS THE STAKES LOS ANGELES CALIFORN Pacific Bell 1980 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS STAKES LOS ANGLES EAST STAKE WA Pacific Telephone 1975 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS Pacific Telephone 1966 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS THE WARDS Pacific Telephone 1960 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS THE WARDS Pacific Telephone 1957 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS THE WARDS ALHAMBRA WARD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 4 FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. BARTLETT AVE 4471 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 H LINDA Cole Information Services 2009 LINDA MA Cole Information Services 2006 D MA Linda Haines Company 2004 LINDA MA Cole Information Services 1957 KUHN IRWIN J Pacific Telephone 4512 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 DUO ZHEN Cole Information Services 2009 DUO ZHEN Cole Information Services JOSE KARAM Cole Information Services JIN CAO Cole Information Services PATRICIA CHIFFER Cole Information Services 2006 e CHIFFER Patla Haines Company 2004 LILIA KARAM Cole Information Services 1999 PATRICIA CHIFFER Cole Information Services JOSE KARAM Cole Information Services DUO ZHEN Cole Information Services 4518 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 KEN TRUONG Cole Information Services 2009 NGOAN TRUONG Cole Information Services 2006 TRAN Suu T Haines Company o KHEN My Haines Company 2004 NGOAN TRUONG Cole Information Services 1999 NGOAN TRUONG Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 5 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1994 ERNST, WALTER E Cole Information Services 1985 ERNST WALTER E Pacific Bell 1980 ERNST WALTER E BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 ERNST WALTER E Pacific Telephone 1966 ERNST WALTER E Pacific Telephone 4523 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 YIK CHHAN Cole Information Services 2009 YIK CHHAN Cole Information Services 2006 CHAO Hov Haines Company 2004 HOV CHAO Cole Information Services 1999 YIK CHHAN Cole Information Services 4524 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 DAVID WONG Cole Information Services 2009 DAVID WONG Cole Information Services 2006 LEE Paul Haines Company 2004 DAVID WONG Cole Information Services 1999 DAVID WONG Cole Information Services 1985 LIM ALICE Pacific Bell 4528 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 THOMAS RAUTH Cole Information Services 2009 THOMAS RAUTH Cole Information Services 2006 RAUTH John Haines Company 1999 THOMAS RAUTH Cole Information Services 1995 Rauth John Pacific Bell Rauton Christina & Rick Whit Pacific Bell 1994 RAUTH, JOHN Cole Information Services 1985 RAUTH JOHN Pacific Bell 1980 RAUTH JOHN BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 6 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 RAUTH JOHN Pacific Telephone 4529 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 KOKICHI MAKAZAWA Cole Information Services 2009 KENZO KOBAYASHI Cole Information Services 2006 o NAKAZAWAKoklchl Haines Company 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1999 KENZO KOBAYASHI Cole Information Services 1980 RYAN JOHN E BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1966 RYAN JOHN E Pacific Telephone 4532 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 RONALD LEE Cole Information Services 2009 ALBERT LEE Cole Information Services 2004 ALBERT LEE Cole Information Services 1999 ALBERT LEE Cole Information Services 1980 QUARRY GENE BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 QUARRY GENE Pacific Telephone 1966 STUDER ROBT P Pacific Telephone 4535 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 RICHARD LENK Cole Information Services 2009 RICHARD LENK Cole Information Services 2006 LENK Richard G Haines Company 2004 RICHARD LENK Cole Information Services 1999 RICHARD LENK Cole Information Services 1995 Lenk Richard G Pacific Bell Lenkin H Pacific Bell 1994 LENK, RICHARD G Cole Information Services 1985 LENK RICHARD G Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 7 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 LENK RICHARD G BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone LENK ROGER E BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 LENK RICHARD G Pacific Telephone 4538 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 DANNY DAM Cole Information Services 2006 o DAM Danny Haines Company 2004 THI TAO Cole Information Services 1999 DANNY DAM Cole Information Services 1995 Dam Phuc D Pacific Bell 1994 DAM, PHUC D Cole Information Services 1975 ALBO ALBERT R Pacific Telephone 4539 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 A KRETTEK Cole Information Services 2006 No Current Listing Haines Company 2004 YING WANG Cole Information Services 1999 A KRETTEK Cole Information Services 1994 LAPIAN, BENNY A Cole Information Services 1985 ASHIZAWA KATSUJIRO Pacific Bell 1980 ASHIZAWA KATSIUJIRO BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 ASHIZAWA KATSUJIR Pacific Telephone 4544 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 HALINA LIU Cole Information Services 2009 LILLIAN ROSSIGNOLI Cole Information Services 2006 HERNANDEZ Gloria Haines Company 2004 GLORIA HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 8 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1985 MC CLELLAN FOREST Pacific Bell 1980 MCCLELLAN FOREST BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1966 MCCLELLAN FOREST Pacific Telephone 4545 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 LAIRD ANDERSON Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 ANDERSON Laird Haines Company SHIPLEY Paul D Haines Company 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1995 Shipley Paul D Pacific Bell 1985 SHIPLEY PAUL D ROSEMEAD Pacific Bell 1980 SHIPLEY PAUL D BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 SHIPLEY PAUL D Pacific Telephone 1966 SHIPLEY PAUL D Pacific Telephone 4549 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 MARCO DARDON Cole Information Services 2009 MARCO DARDON Cole Information Services 2006 DARDON Marco Haines Company 2004 MARCO DARDON Cole Information Services 1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services MARCO DARDON Cole Information Services 1985 DARDON MARCO ANTONIO Pacific Bell DARDON MARCO ANTONIO Pacific Bell 1980 DARDON MARCO ANTONIO BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone DARDON MARCO ANTONIO BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 DARDON MARCO ANTONIO Pacific Telephone 1966 DARDON MARCO ANTONIO Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 9 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4550 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 JIMMIE MORENO Cole Information Services 2009 GILBERT MORENO Cole Information Services 2004 GILBERT MORENO Cole Information Services 1999 GILBERT MORENO Cole Information Services 1985 MORENO MICHAEL Pacific Bell 1980 MORENO GILBERT N BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 MORENO GILBERT N Pacific Telephone 1966 MORENO GILBERT N Pacific Telephone 4602 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 NHON LAM Cole Information Services 2009 HONG LAM Cole Information Services 2006 LAN Binh Haines Company 2004 HONG LAM Cole Information Services 1999 HONG LAM Cole Information Services 1985 MARQUEZ JUAN JOSE Pacific Bell 1975 MALONEY MICHAEL A Pacific Telephone 1966 MALONEY MICHAEL A Pacific Telephone 1960 RAUTH JOHN Pacific Telephone 1957 RAUTH JOHN Pacific Telephone 4603 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 ANITA BANH Cole Information Services 2009 ALEXANDER NGO Cole Information Services 2006 BANH Anit Haines Company NGO Alexander D Haines Company 2004 ALEXANDER NGO Cole Information Services 1999 ALEXANDER NGO Cole Information Services 1995 Banh Anita Pacific Bell Ngo Alexander Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 10 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 Ngo Amie Y Pacific Bell Ngo An Khon Sll E Maple Av Mon Pacific Bell 1994 NGO, A Cole Information Services BANH, ANITA Cole Information Services 1985 ROBERTSON EARL Pacific Bell 1980 ROBERTSON EARL BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 ROBERTSON EARL Pacific Telephone 1966 ROBERTSON EARL Pacific Telephone 1960 KALTE RUTH A MRS Pacific Telephone EDGAR WM R Pacific Telephone 1957 EDGAR WM R Pacific Telephone 4606 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 GLORIA CORDOVA Cole Information Services 2009 GLORIA CORDOVA Cole Information Services 2006 CORDOVA Gloria Haines Company 2004 GLORIA MENDOZA Cole Information Services 1999 GLORIA CORDOVA Cole Information Services 1960 MAURO JOHN Pacific Telephone 1957 MAURO JOHN Pacific Telephone 4607 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 FENGYI SITU Cole Information Services 2009 RONG SITU Cole Information Services 2006 SITU Rong Haines Company 2004 RONG SITU Cole Information Services 1999 RONG SITU Cole Information Services 1995 Vollrath G Pacific Bell 1994 VOLLRATH, GWEN Cole Information Services 1985 VOLLRATH G Pacific Bell 1980 VOLLRATH ROLAND F BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 11 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 VOLLRATH ROLAND F Pacific Telephone 1966 VOLLRATH ROLAND F Pacific Telephone 1960 VOLLRATH ROLAND F Pacific Telephone 1957 VOLLRATH ROLAND F Pacific Telephone 4612 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 BRIAN MOSELEY Cole Information Services 2009 ROSS ROTH Cole Information Services 2006 a ROTH Ross T Haines Company 2004 ROSS ROTH Cole Information Services 1999 ROSS ROTH Cole Information Services 1995 Roth Ross T Pacific Bell Roth Sibyl Pacific Bell Roth Steven Whit Pacific Bell Roth Timothy & Katherlne Pacific Bell Roth V Pacific Bell 1994 ROTH, ROSS T Cole Information Services 1985 ROTH ROSS T Pacific Bell 1980 ROTH ROSS T BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 ROTH ROSS T Pacific Telephone 1966 ROTH RASS T Pacific Telephone 1960 ROTH ROSS T Pacific Telephone 1957 ROTH ROSS T Pacific Telephone 4613 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 CARLOS VILLAGRAN Cole Information Services 2009 LAWRENCE SCHINTZ Cole Information Services 2006 SCHINTZ Lawrence L Haines Company VILLAGRAN Carlos Haines Company 2004 LAWRENCE SCHINTZ Cole Information Services 1999 LAWRENCE SCHINTZ Cole Information Services 1994 SCHINTZ, LAURIE L Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 12 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1985 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L Pacific Bell 1980 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1966 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L Pacific Telephone 1960 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L Pacific Telephone 1957 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L Pacific Telephone 4616 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 STONECYPHER Haines Company William Haines Company 1980 STONECYPHER JOYCE BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1966 KORBONSKI JOHN A Pacific Telephone 1960 TRAYLOR GLENN Pacific Telephone 1957 TRAYLOR GLENN Pacific Telephone 4617 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 WILLIAM STONECYPHER Cole Information Services 2009 WILLIAM STONECYPHER Cole Information Services 2006 WIllam Haines Company e STONECYPHER Haines Company 2004 WILLIAM STONECYPHER Cole Information Services 1999 WILLIAM STONECYPHER Cole Information Services 1966 POORE STANLEY R Pacific Telephone 1960 POORE STANLEY R Pacific Telephone 1957 POORE STANLEY R Pacific Telephone 4623 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 MIKE TO Cole Information Services 2009 MIKE TO Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 13 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2006 TO Mike Haines Company 2004 MIKE TO Cole Information Services 1999 MIKE TO Cole Information Services 1975 CALDERON MARIO S Pacific Telephone 1966 GERBERICK JAS H Pacific Telephone 1960 GERBERICK JAS H Pacific Telephone 1957 GERBERICK JAS H Pacific Telephone 4624 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 SAMMY DO Cole Information Services 2009 WEIQIN WU Cole Information Services 2006 o LEE Carol Haines Company 2004 CAROL LEE Cole Information Services BENJAMIN TAGLER Cole Information Services 1999 WEIQIN WU Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1960 COLLINS FRANK H Pacific Telephone 1957 KALTE RUTH A MRS Pacific Telephone 4629 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 QUYEN TO Cole Information Services 2009 QUYEN TO Cole Information Services 2006 a TO Quyen Haines Company 2004 QUYEN TO Cole Information Services 1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services QUYEN TO Cole Information Services 4634 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 JEFF ORONZO Cole Information Services 2009 JEFFREY ORONZO Cole Information Services 2006 ORONZO Jeffrey Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 14 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1999 JEFFREY ORONZO Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 4706 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 WARD THOS BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4710 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 LEIGH J DENNIS BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4715 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 ROY ROLAND A BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1966 ROY ROLAND A Pacific Telephone 4725 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 1995 L Chang Denny Pacific Bell 4732 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 1975 STURROCK WM III ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4702 1/2 BARTLETT AVE Year Uses Source 1985 AVILA LUIS Pacific Bell 1980 AVILA LUIS BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 AVILA LUIS Pacific Telephone BARTLETT ST 4512 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 KARAM Jose Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 15 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4518 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 ERNST Walter E Haines Company 4524 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 LEE Or S Haines Company 4528 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 RAUTH John Haines Company 4529 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 NAKAZAWA Kokichi Haines Company 4532 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 LEE Julie N Haines Company 4535 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 LENK Richard G Haines Company 4538 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 DAM Danny Haines Company 4539 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 XXXX Haines Company 4545 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 SHIPLEY Paul D Haines Company X ZERELDA Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 16 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4602 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 TSANG Esther Haines Company 4603 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 BANH Anita Haines Company NGO Alexander D Haines Company 4607 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 VOLLRATH G Haines Company 4612 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 ROTH Ross T Haines Company 4613 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 SCHINTZ Lawrence L Haines Company 4616 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 STONECYPHER William Haines Company 4623 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 VUONG Tritia K Haines Company 4629 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 TO Quyen Yen Haines Company 4634 BARTLETT ST Year Uses Source 1999 XXXX Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 17 Year Uses Source FINDINGS BLUE CIR 8604 BLUE CIR Year Uses Source 2015 BITANG HU Cole Information Services 2009 JOHNNY LU Cole Information Services 2004 JOHNNY LU Cole Information Services 1999 JOHNNY LU Cole Information Services LU John 626 2 E Haines Company 1994 LU, JOHN Cole Information Services 1985 LU JOHN Pacific Bell 1980 LU JOHN BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 MARANAN CHAS Pacific Telephone 8605 BLUE CIR Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 CARPIO Rufino Haines Company 2004 RUFINO CARPIO Cole Information Services 1999 RUFINO CARPIO Cole Information Services CARPIO Rufino Haines Company 8610 BLUE CIR Year Uses Source 2015 WILSON LU Cole Information Services 2009 JUANITO REYNALDO Cole Information Services 2006 POSADA Nenlita Haines Company o ARROYO Juanlto Haines Company 2004 JUANITO REYNALDO Cole Information Services 1999 JUANITO REYNALDO Cole Information Services POSADA Nenita O Haines Company 1995 Posada Virgilio Pacific Bell 1994 POSADA, V Cole Information Services 1985 POSADA VIRGILIO Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 18 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 POSADA VIRGILIO BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 POSADA VIRGILIO ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 8611 BLUE CIR Year Uses Source 2015 KEVIN LEE Cole Information Services 2009 KEVIN LEE Cole Information Services 2006 LEE Dixie 00 a Haines Company 2004 CLIFTON LEE Cole Information Services 1999 KEVIN LEE Cole Information Services SOOHOO Tony S Haines Company 1975 MEDINA RAUL V Pacific Telephone 8616 BLUE CIR Year Uses Source 2015 GARY NGAN Cole Information Services 2009 WAH NGAN Cole Information Services 2004 WAH NGAN Cole Information Services 1999 WAH NGAN Cole Information Services NGAN Hon Wah Haines Company NGAN Hon Wah Haines Company 1995 Ngan Hon Wah Pacific Bell 1994 NGAN, HON W Cole Information Services 1985 NGAN HON WAH Pacific Bell 1980 NGAN HON WAH BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 PAPA ERNESTO F Pacific Telephone 8617 BLUE CIR Year Uses Source 2015 DAVID LO Cole Information Services 2009 DAVID LO Cole Information Services 2006 LO David Haines Company 1999 X WALNUT GROVE AV N Haines Company HONG T M Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 19 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 DAVID LO Cole Information Services 1980 ALLEN DON & CARRIE BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone ALLEN DON G BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone HALKETT AVE 4515 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 DOMINIC BARACCHINI Cole Information Services 2009 DOMINIC BARACCHINI Cole Information Services 2006 BARACCHINI Dominic Haines Company 2004 DOMINIC BARACCHINI Cole Information Services 1999 MARY CASIELLO Cole Information Services DOMINIC BARACCHINI Cole Information Services CASIELLO Mary Haines Company 4516 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 JAMES LIZAKOWSKI Cole Information Services 2009 JAMES LIZAKOWSKI Cole Information Services 2006 LIZAKOWSKI Jas A Haines Company 2004 JAMES LIZAKOWSKI Cole Information Services 1999 JAMES LIZAKOWSKI Cole Information Services LIZAKOWSKI Jas A Haines Company 1995 Llzakowski Jas A Pacific Bell 4520 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1999 KUSAYANAGI George T Haines Company LIBERTO Giuseppe Haines Company 4522 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 RUBEN ESCOBAL Cole Information Services 2009 RUBEN ESCOBAL Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 20 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2006 ESCOBALRuben Haines Company 2004 RUBEN ESCOBAL Cole Information Services 1999 RUBEN ESCOBAL Cole Information Services ESCODAL Danasa Haines Company 4523 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 KEN LAM Cole Information Services 2009 KEN LAM Cole Information Services 2006 SOOJoo Haines Company LUCJojo M Haines Company 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1999 KEN LAM Cole Information Services GUERRERO Peggy S Haines Company 1985 MA KENNETH & JULIANA Pacific Bell 4526 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 NHU KHUU Cole Information Services 2009 NHU KHUU Cole Information Services 2006 KHUU Nhu Haines Company 2004 DANNY LY Cole Information Services 1999 NHU KHUU Cole Information Services 1994 LIBERTO, G Cole Information Services 4529 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 VAN KUSAYANAGI Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1985 KUSAYANAGI GEO Pacific Bell 4530 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1999 KHANH Tu K Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 21 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4532 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 ISABEL SEAGER Cole Information Services 2009 ISABEL SEAGER Cole Information Services 2006 SEAGERAMeene Haines Company 1999 X TURPIN Haines Company VICTORIAN Raymond Haines Company ISABEL SEAGER Cole Information Services 1994 CITY LAWN SVC & LANDSCAPE Cole Information Services 1985 CITY LAWN SERVICE Pacific Bell 4536 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 SHING YIU Cole Information Services 2009 SHING YIU Cole Information Services 2006 a KHANH Tu Haines Company 2004 SHING YIU Cole Information Services 1999 SHING YIU Cole Information Services 1985 MARANAN MARVIN M Pacific Bell 4542 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 FREDDY ZELADA Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 O DIZON Jason Haines Company 2004 CANCHOLA TRUCKING Cole Information Services JASON DIZON Cole Information Services 1999 DIZON Jason K Haines Company 1995 I Gutlerrez Alberto Pacific Bell 1994 GUTIERREZ, ALBERTO Cole Information Services 1986 LEE HYUN KUN ROSEMEAD Pacific Bell 1985 LEE HYUN KUN Pacific Bell 1981 LEE HYUN KUN ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 22 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4548 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 KELLY BUI Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 LAM Lisa Haines Company 2004 HANG LAM Cole Information Services 1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 4552 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 ANGELINA JOHNSON Cole Information Services 2006 No Current Listing Haines Company 2004 ANGELINA JOHNSON Cole Information Services 1999 ANGELINA JOHNSON Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 4558 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 STEVEN PHAM Cole Information Services 2009 DAVID CARRANZA Cole Information Services 2006 CARRANZA David Haines Company 2004 DAVID CARRANZA Cole Information Services 1999 PANG Shu Pui Haines Company 1995 Pang Shu Pu I Pacific Bell 1994 PANG, SHU P Cole Information Services 4561 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 DENNIS HOKAMA Cole Information Services 2009 DENNIS HOKAMA Cole Information Services 2006 HOKAMA Dennis Haines Company 2004 DENNIS HOKAMA Cole Information Services 1999 DENNIS HOKAMA Cole Information Services X MISSION DR Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 23 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 HOKAMA Dennis Haines Company 1995 Hokama Dennis Pacific Bell 1994 HOKAMA, DENNIS Cole Information Services 1985 HOKAMA DENNIS Pacific Bell 4598 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1999 XXXX Haines Company 4641 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1999 HONG Byron Haines Company 4654 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1999 KARLEN Nora Haines Company 4671 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1999 XXXX Haines Company 4676 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1999 PHUN Mui Moc Haines Company X GRAND AV Haines Company 4702 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 ADRIANE HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services 2009 ANTON HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services 2006 No Current Listing Haines Company 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1999 ANTON HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services XXXX Haines Company 1957 AMIDAN FRANK A Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 24 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4703 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 VO HUYNH Cole Information Services 2009 VO HUYNH Cole Information Services 2006 JURADOArnanda Haines Company 2004 GILBERT MENDEZ Cole Information Services 1999 VO HUYNH Cole Information Services MENDEZ Gilbert T Haines Company 1995 Mender Gilbert T Pacific Bell 1994 MENDEZ, GILBERT T Cole Information Services 1985 MENDEZ GILBERT T Pacific Bell 1980 MENDEZ GILBERT T HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4706 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 2015 ROSS OLIVA Cole Information Services 2009 HUAN TRAN Cole Information Services 2006 NIEQIn Haines Company 2004 NHON CHEN Cole Information Services 1999 HUAN TRAN Cole Information Services ZHU Wenhong Haines Company 1994 HAO, YEN W Cole Information Services 1980 CONOVER GARY HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4712 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 MERENDA JOS H HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4713 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 CARLILE GEO HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 25 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4724 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 RIVERA RUTILLA HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4725 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 BONE VERNIE E HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4728 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 FULLER W J HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4729 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 FEASE MAE HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4735 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 FROSCHAUER DAVID L & JEANNE HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4741 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Daniels Chas R Pacific Bell 1980 DANIELS CHAS R HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4745 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 TYLER L HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4754 HALKETT AVE Year Uses Source 1980 DAVID SOLO HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 26 Year Uses Source FINDINGS LA PRESA AVE 4432 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 SCHULTZ MYRON LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4436 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 JUANITA CONTRERAS Cole Information Services 2009 JUANITA CONTRERAS Cole Information Services 2004 JUANITA CONTRERAS Cole Information Services 1999 JUANITA CONTRERAS Cole Information Services 4437 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 SHAO WEN Cole Information Services 2009 FERN GOMES Cole Information Services 2004 FERN GOMES Cole Information Services 1999 FERN GOMES Cole Information Services 4440 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 MICHAEL LORUSSO Cole Information Services 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1985 CARWILE SCOTT Pacific Bell 4443 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 STEVEN ESSEX Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2004 WESLEY ESSEX Cole Information Services 1999 ESSEX Wesley A Haines Company 1994 ESSEX, WESLEY A Cole Information Services 1985 ESSEX WESLEY A Pacific Bell 1980 ESSEX WESLEY A LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 27 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4446 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 GARY TALLMAN Cole Information Services 2009 PEGGY SHAHENIAN Cole Information Services 2004 PEGGY SHAHENIAN Cole Information Services 1999 PEGGY SHAHENIAN Cole Information Services SHAHENIAN Edward B Haines Company 1995 Shahid Albert Pacific Bell Shahenian Edw B Pacific Bell 1994 SHAHENIAN, EDWARD B Cole Information Services 1985 SHAHENIAN P L Pacific Bell SHAHENIAN EDW B Pacific Bell 1980 SHAHENIAN EDW B LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4447 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 RICHARD WONG Cole Information Services 2009 JEFFREY WONG Cole Information Services 2004 RICHARD WONG Cole Information Services 1999 JEFFREY WONG Cole Information Services HARER Ray M Haines Company 1995 Harer Ray M Pacific Bell 1994 HARER, RAY M Cole Information Services 1985 HARER RAY M Pacific Bell 1980 HARER RAY M LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4450 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 TOYOSHI NAKAI Cole Information Services 2009 TOYOSHI NAKAI Cole Information Services 2004 TOYOSHI NAKAI Cole Information Services 1999 TOYOSHI NAKAI Cole Information Services NAKAI Toyoshi Haines Company 1995 I Nakal Toyoshl Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 28 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 i Nakal Yasuhiro Pacific Bell 1994 NAKAI, TOYOSHI Cole Information Services 1985 NAKAI TOYOSHI ROSEMEAD Pacific Bell 1980 NAKAI HARUMI LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone NAKAI TOYOSHI LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4453 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 JEFF CORTEZ Cole Information Services 2009 FRANCISCO CORTES Cole Information Services 2004 FRANCISCO CORTES Cole Information Services 1999 FRANCISCO CORTES Cole Information Services 4456 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 CEDRIC CATERIO Cole Information Services 2009 CEDRIC CATERIO Cole Information Services 2004 CEDRIC CATERIO Cole Information Services 1985 MILNER JAY Pacific Bell 1980 MILNER JAY LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4457 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 DANIEL WASHBURN Cole Information Services 2009 DANIEL WASHBURN Cole Information Services 2004 SAI LAM Cole Information Services 1999 DANIEL WASHBURN Cole Information Services NUMBERS Wayne F Haines Company 1995 Numbers Wayne O Pacific Bell 1994 NUMBERS, WAYNE D Cole Information Services 1985 NUMBERS WAYNE D Pacific Bell 1980 NUMBERS WAYNE D LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 29 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4461 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 CALEB HALL Cole Information Services 2009 LIANG HALL Cole Information Services 2004 LIANG HALL Cole Information Services 1999 LIANG HALL Cole Information Services X ZERELDA Haines Company HALL Liang Haines Company 1995 Hall iang Pacific Bell 1994 HALL, LIANG Cole Information Services 1980 BENESH ROBT M LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4462 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 ARTURO VALDEZ Cole Information Services 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1999 ARTURO VALDEZ Cole Information Services 1985 BUENO R S Pacific Bell 1980 BUENO R S LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4465 LA PRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2015 HTUN THUREIN Cole Information Services 2009 NORMAN LIM Cole Information Services 2004 NORMAN LIM Cole Information Services 1999 NORMAN LIM Cole Information Services 1985 BARKER L B Pacific Bell 1980 BARKER JOHN M LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 30 Year Uses Source FINDINGS LAPRESA AVE 4436 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 0 CONTRERAS Juanita Haines Company 4437 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 0 GOMES Richard Haines Company 4440 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 No Current Listing Haines Company 4443 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 ESSEXWesley Haines Company 4446 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 SHAHENIAN P Haines Company o SHAHENIANL Haines Company 4447 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 o WONG Richard S Haines Company 4450 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 o NAKAI Toyoshl Haines Company 4453 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 o CORTEZ Francisco Haines Company 4456 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 o CATERIO Cedric Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 31 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4457 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 CHOUSam Haines Company WASHBURN Daniel Haines Company 4461 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 HALLLlang Haines Company LIM Robert Haines Company 4462 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 TELLECHEAGeorgina Haines Company 4465 LAPRESA AVE Year Uses Source 2006 o LIM Robertd Haines Company MISSION DR 8504 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 FRANK LIMON Cole Information Services 2009 FRANK LIMON Cole Information Services 2006 LIMON Carolyn Haines Company 2004 FRANK LIMON Cole Information Services 1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services FRANK LIMON Cole Information Services 8512 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 ASHWIN LUHAR Cole Information Services 2009 ASHWIN LUHAR Cole Information Services 2006 LUHARAshwin Haines Company 2004 ASHWIN LUHAR Cole Information Services 1999 ASHWIN LUHAR Cole Information Services 1985 FLEETWOOD DRIVE AWAY Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 32 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 8516 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 e LEEManryann Haines Company 2004 MARRYANN LEE Cole Information Services 1995 DIEP ANH-LE Pacific Bell Diep Anh Le Pacific Bell Diep B BPk Pacific Bell 1994 DIEP, ANHLE Cole Information Services 8520 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 JIN LEW Cole Information Services 2009 HO LEW Cole Information Services 2006 LEWJin Ho Haines Company 2004 JIN LEW Cole Information Services 1999 HO LEW Cole Information Services 1995 LEW JIN HO Pacific Bell 1994 LEW, JIN H Cole Information Services 1985 LEW LILY Pacific Bell LEW JIN HO Pacific Bell 1975 SONG KEITH Pacific Telephone 8526 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 CHENG LIU Cole Information Services 2009 CHENG LIU Cole Information Services 2006 LIUCH Haines Company 2004 MICHAEL LIU Cole Information Services 1999 CHENG LIU Cole Information Services 1995 Liu C H Pacific Bell Liu CM Whit Pacific Bell Liue C Pacific Bell LIU C H Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 33 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1994 LIU, CLAIRE H Cole Information Services 1985 LIU PHILIP CHENG-HSING Pacific Bell 1975 PLONOWSKI HENRY A Pacific Telephone 8541 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 ANTHONY LESLIE Cole Information Services 2009 EVERTON LESLIE Cole Information Services 2006 LESLIE Rachel Haines Company 2004 RACHEL LESLIE Cole Information Services 1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services EVERTON LESLIE Cole Information Services 1975 TAYLOR TIMOTHY Pacific Telephone 1960 COCHRAN PEGGY S Pacific Telephone 1957 EVANS R L Pacific Telephone 8544 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 NHAT NGUYEN Cole Information Services 2009 NHI VO Cole Information Services 2006 VO Nhuan Haines Company NHUAN Duo Haines Company 2004 JOSE VERGARA Cole Information Services 1999 NHI VO Cole Information Services 1995 Patel Usha Natu Pacific Bell Patel VK Pacific Bell PATEL USHA NATU Pacific Bell 1994 PATEL, USHA N Cole Information Services 1985 PATEL USHA NATU Pacific Bell 1980 PATEL USHA NATU MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 PATEL NATU B Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 34 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 8547 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 FEDERICO SOLIS Cole Information Services 2009 ALDO SOLIS Cole Information Services 2006 SOLIS Federico Haines Company 2004 FEDERICO SOLIS Cole Information Services 1999 ALDO SOLIS Cole Information Services 1995 SOLIS FEDERICO Pacific Bell Solis Federico Pacific Bell Soils Francisco J Pacific Bell Solis Freddy & Rosa Azu Pacific Bell Solis Gayle & Ruben Jr Pacific Bell 1985 SOLIS FEDERICO Pacific Bell 1957 STARR VEDA Pacific Telephone 8610 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 ANTONIO MORALES Cole Information Services 2009 ANTONIO MORALES Cole Information Services 2006 MORALESAntonio Haines Company 2004 ANTONIO MORALES Cole Information Services 1999 ANTONIO MORALES Cole Information Services 1966 RICHARDS S ORA Pacific Telephone 1960 RICHARDS ORA Pacific Telephone 8618 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Cole Information Services FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH Cole Information Services 2009 BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Cole Information Services FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD Cole Information Services 2006 FIRST BAPT CH Haines Company BEREAN CHRISTIAN Haines Company 2004 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 35 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1999 BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Cole Information Services FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD Cole Information Services 1995 BE RE AN CHRIS TIAN S CHOOL Pacific Bell BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Pacific Bell 1994 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ROSEMEAD Cole Information Services BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Cole Information Services 1986 A B C CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER Pacific Bell 1985 IGLESIA BAUTISTA HISPANA DE CRISTO Pacific Bell HEAD START ABC CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER Pacific Bell FIRST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD THE Pacific Bell ALHAMBRA AREA CHURCH COUNCIL INC Pacific Bell A B C CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER MAIN OFFICE Pacific Bell 1981 A B C CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER Pacific Telephone 1980 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD THE MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD THE Pacific Telephone SMALL WORLD CHRISTIAN PRE-SCHOOL Pacific Telephone 8623 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 1985 SCHWEBACH FRANK N Pacific Bell 1980 SCHWEBACH FRANK N MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 SCHWEBACH FRANK N Pacific Telephone 8625 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 WAYNE DUBOIS Cole Information Services 8630 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services 2009 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 36 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2006 TRANCuong Haines Company 2004 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services 1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services 1980 BENNETT LAUREL MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1966 NELSON ARTHUR C Pacific Telephone 8632 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 SUPING WU Cole Information Services 2009 BENNETT STEVENN STEVENNS GARDENING Cole Information Services THOMAS BENNETT Cole Information Services 2006 BENETTS 6avenn Haines Company 2004 THOMAS BENNETT Cole Information Services 1999 THOMAS BENNETT Cole Information Services 1994 SEMKOWICZ, LEONARD F Cole Information Services 1985 SEMKOWICZ LEONARD F Pacific Bell 1980 SEMKOWICZ LEONARD F MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 SEMKOWICZ LEONARD F Pacific Telephone 1966 SEMKOWICZ LEONARD F Pacific Telephone 8634 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 VU NGUYEN Cole Information Services 2009 KHON NGUYEN Cole Information Services 2006 NGUYENK Haines Company 2004 KHON NGUYEN Cole Information Services 1999 KHON NGUYEN Cole Information Services 1985 STAFFORD JOS A Pacific Bell 1980 STAFFORD JOS A MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 STAFFORD JOS A Pacific Telephone 1966 STAFFORD VICTORIA Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 37 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 8635 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2009 BIG BLUE HOUSE PUBLISHING CO Cole Information Services 2006 BIG BLUE HSE Haines Company PUBUSHING CO DUBOIS D Haines Company 2004 WAYNE DUBOIS Cole Information Services BIG BLUE HOUSE PUBLISHING CO Cole Information Services 1995 Du bois Wayne A Pacific Bell Du Bols Patrick Pacific Bell DU BOIS WAYNE A Pacific Bell 1994 DUBOIS, WAYNE A Cole Information Services 1985 DUBOIS WAYNE A Pacific Bell 1966 BRADY HUGH C Pacific Telephone BRADY HUGH C RL EST APPRSR Pacific Telephone 1960 BRADY HUGH C RL EST APPRSR Pacific Telephone 1957 BRADY HUGH C RL EST APPR Pacific Telephone 8636 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 TIGER TU Cole Information Services 2009 DENNIS ORGOVAN Cole Information Services 2006 ORGOVANJ Haines Company 2004 ROBERT MAXWELL Cole Information Services 1999 DENNIS ORGOVAN Cole Information Services ROBERT MAXWELL Cole Information Services 1994 MAXWELL, ROBERT L Cole Information Services 1985 MAXWELL ROBT L Pacific Bell 1975 MAXWELL ROBT L Pacific Telephone 1966 MAXWELL R L Pacific Telephone 1960 JACKMAN R R Pacific Telephone 1957 JACKMAN R R R Pacific Telephone 8637 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 LINH LUU Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 38 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 JACKIE LY Cole Information Services 2006 No Current Listing Haines Company 2004 MELYNDA HONG Cole Information Services 1999 JACKIE LY Cole Information Services 1995 i Huynh Johnny Pacific Bell Huynh John Pacific Bell 1985 LEE KENNETH Pacific Bell 1980 AGUIRRE LUIS G MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 AGUIRRE L G Pacific Telephone 1966 PAPINEAU FRANCIS Pacific Telephone 8639 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 TIEN HO Cole Information Services 2009 TIEN HO Cole Information Services 2004 KWAN HO Cole Information Services 1999 TIEN HO Cole Information Services 1966 OWEN ROBT Pacific Telephone 8644 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 HANSON LAM Cole Information Services 2009 HSING HO Cole Information Services 2006 GIANG Thanh Haines Company HO Al Jexander Haines Company LIANGShiyuan Haines Company 1999 HSING HO Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1985 GUIA MIRTA Pacific Bell 1980 HERRERA DAVE R MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1960 FORESTER ETHELMAE Pacific Telephone 1957 FORESTER HAROLD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 39 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 8645 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 NGOR SOKARA Cole Information Services 2009 SI TAN Cole Information Services 2006 PUY Chan Haines Company LUOYu Yan Haines Company 2004 YU LUO Cole Information Services 1999 SI TAN Cole Information Services 1985 OLLIVIER E Pacific Bell 1980 OLLIVIER E MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 OLLIVIER E Pacific Telephone 8650 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 YONG WONG Cole Information Services 2009 YONG WONG Cole Information Services 2006 WONGChing L Haines Company 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1999 YONG WONG Cole Information Services 1980 GONZALES P MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1966 THAYER ELMER L Pacific Telephone 1960 THAYER ELMER L Pacific Telephone 1957 THAYER ELMER L R Pacific Telephone 8651 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 RODREGUIZMartha Haines Company 2004 VIDALINA MALDONADO Cole Information Services 1999 JULIO RODRIGUEZ Cole Information Services 8654 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 1957 HARLAN LOIS Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 40 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 8655 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 ELEFF R Haines Company 2004 RUDY ELEFF Cole Information Services 1995 I Eleff R A Pacific Bell ELEFFR A Pacific Bell 1994 ELEFF, RUDOLPH A Cole Information Services 1985 ELEFF R A Pacific Bell 1980 ELEFF R A MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 ELEFF R A Pacific Telephone 1966 ELEFF A Pacific Telephone 1960 ELEFF A Pacific Telephone 1957 ELEFF A Pacific Telephone 8658 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 PEDRO MONTENEGRO Cole Information Services 2009 MONTENEGRO & PARTNERS INC Cole Information Services SILVIA MONTENEGRO Cole Information Services 2006 MONTENEGRO Pedro Haines Company 2004 SILVIA MONTONEGRO Cole Information Services MONTENEGRO & PARTNERS INC Cole Information Services 1999 SILVIA MONTENEGRO Cole Information Services MONTENEGRO & PARTNERS Cole Information Services 1980 VANDERCOOK D L MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone O SHEA T MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 MESSENGER CONLEY L Pacific Telephone 1966 DURAN JACOB H Pacific Telephone 1960 SKUPIEN STANLEY A Pacific Telephone 1957 SKUPIEN STANLEY A Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 41 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 8701 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 CHRIS DREW Cole Information Services 2004 CHRIS DREW Cole Information Services 1999 CHRIS DREW Cole Information Services 1985 LEE JIM R ROSEMEAD Pacific Bell 1980 LEE MARK JAMES MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 LEE GARY Pacific Telephone 1957 ZWICK RAOUL Pacific Telephone 8702 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 CALDERON Jesus Haines Company 1999 JAIME CALDERON Cole Information Services 1980 CALDERON JESUS MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 CALDERON JESUS Pacific Telephone 1966 JOHNSON ROY L Pacific Telephone JOHNSON JERRY Pacific Telephone 1960 MORENO LEE V Pacific Telephone 1957 MORENO LEE V Pacific Telephone 8703 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 2015 TOSHI SAKAUYE Cole Information Services 2009 TOSHI SAKAUYE Cole Information Services 2006 SAKAUYEMinonu Haines Company 2004 TOSHI SAKAUYE Cole Information Services 1995 SAKAEUYE MINORE Pacific Bell 1994 SAKAUYE, MINORU Cole Information Services 1985 SAKAUYE MINORU Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 42 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 SAKAUYE MINORU MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1957 CAMASTA JOS R Pacific Telephone 8710 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 1960 BIGELOW J DAVID REV ROSEMEAD FOUR SQUARE CHURCH Pacific Telephone 1957 CRON JAS R REV Pacific Telephone 8714 MISSION DR Year Uses Source 1980 FOURSQUARE CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone ROSEMEAD FOURSQUARE CHURCH MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone WALNUT GROVE AVE 4465 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 FAN TSENG Cole Information Services 2009 FAN TSENG Cole Information Services 2006 o HUNGYuh 00 E Haines Company 2004 FAN TSENG Cole Information Services 1999 FAN TSENG Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1985 TZENG ROBERT F Pacific Bell 4469 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 KEIKO MISUMI Cole Information Services 2009 KEIKO MISUMI Cole Information Services 2006 MISUMI Etsuko Haines Company 2004 KEIKO MISUMI Cole Information Services 1999 KEIKO MISUMI Cole Information Services 1995 Misumi Etsuko Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 43 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1985 OTAGIRI MASAHISA Pacific Bell 4473 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 ANNA SAM Cole Information Services 2009 RAY LEE Cole Information Services 2006 LEE Eun 00 S Haines Company 2004 EUN LEE Cole Information Services HWAN EUN Cole Information Services 1999 RAY LEE Cole Information Services 4477 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 ELIZABETH ENG Cole Information Services 2006 ENG Elizabeth Haines Company 2004 Q LIDONNA Cole Information Services FONG GUI Cole Information Services DONNA LI Cole Information Services 1999 ELIZABETH ENG Cole Information Services 1985 MUH JACKSON WEN-MUGI Pacific Bell 4481 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 FU MING Cole Information Services 2009 MING LI Cole Information Services 2006 MING Fu Haines Company 2004 YI CHENG Cole Information Services FU MING Cole Information Services MING LI Cole Information Services HSIU HSIAO Cole Information Services 1999 MING LI Cole Information Services 1995 Amorelli Joseph Pacific Bell 1994 AMORELLI, JOSEPH Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 44 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1985 AMORELLI JOSEPH Pacific Bell 4485 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 P DANH Cole Information Services ANDY LEE Cole Information Services ZHENG KENNEDY Cole Information Services 2006 KENNEDY Min Haines Company MENG Zhe Haines Company 2004 TONG PAN Cole Information Services YU LI Cole Information Services KAI CHEN Cole Information Services CHANG YAO Cole Information Services 1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services P DANH Cole Information Services ZHENG KENNEDY Cole Information Services ANDY LEE Cole Information Services 1995 Chien Loh Ping Pacific Bell 1994 CHIEN, LOHPING Cole Information Services 1985 CHIEN LOH PING Pacific Bell 4489 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 ANITA LOW Cole Information Services 2009 ANITA LOW Cole Information Services 2006 LOW Freda Haines Company 2004 ANITA LOW Cole Information Services 1999 ANITA LOW Cole Information Services 4493 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 JEROD WARNEY Cole Information Services 2009 NOBUYOSHI KURASAKO Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 45 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2006 Nobuyosh I Haines Company KURASAKO Haines Company 2004 NOBUYOSHI KURASAKO Cole Information Services 1999 NOBUYOSHI KURASAKO Cole Information Services 1995 Kurasako Nobuyoshi Pacific Bell Kuerata Fred S Pacific Bell 1994 KURASAKO, N Cole Information Services 4497 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 TSAI CHEN Cole Information Services 2009 TSAI CHEN Cole Information Services 2006 WALNUTGRV Haines Company CHEN Tsal Haines Company TOWNHOME Haines Company 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1999 TSAI CHEN Cole Information Services WALNUT GROVE TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Cole Information Services 1995 Walnut Grove Townhomes Homeowners Assn Pacific Bell 1994 WALNUT GRV TOWNHOME Cole Information Services 4503 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 MARGARITA HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services EMILY KING Cole Information Services IAN BLACKWELL Cole Information Services TERESITA RUIZ Cole Information Services 2009 LOR WENDY Cole Information Services SAID DAHOMA Cole Information Services OMAR BARRIOS Cole Information Services EMILY KING Cole Information Services JOSE DAYAO Cole Information Services 2006 RUIZ David Haines Company 6684447-5 Page 46 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2006 MORALES Rober Haines Company ASTENGO Hary Haines Company LIEUChee Haines Company 2004 LIBRADO SAAVEDRA Cole Information Services XIAO DU Cole Information Services BERTHA CUEVAS Cole Information Services HARRY ASTENGO Cole Information Services CHEE LIEU Cole Information Services JANINE GUBA Cole Information Services 1999 SHEILA RODARTE Cole Information Services OMAR BARRIOS Cole Information Services SAID DAHOMA Cole Information Services JOSE DAYAO Cole Information Services LOR WENDY Cole Information Services EMILY KING Cole Information Services 1994 HUYNH, NU Cole Information Services 1975 HILL ORVILL W Pacific Telephone 1966 HILL ORVILL W Pacific Telephone 1960 MC NIEL PATRICK M Pacific Telephone 1957 MCNIEL PATRICK M Pacific Telephone 4506 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 1960 WHISEANT HARREL Pacific Telephone 1957 MCMILLAN HERBERT J R Pacific Telephone 4509 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 VALERIE BASQUETTE Cole Information Services 2006 MCNEILRF Haines Company 2004 R MCNEIL Cole Information Services 1995 Mc Niel R F Pacific Bell 1994 MCNIEL, RAYMOND F Cole Information Services 1985 MC NIEL R F Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 47 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 MCNIEL R F WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 MCNIEL R F Pacific Telephone 1966 MCNIEL R F Pacific Telephone 1960 MC NIEL R F Pacific Telephone 1957 MCNIEL R F R Pacific Telephone 4512 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 HEATH ROBT D SR Pacific Telephone 1957 HEATH ROBT D SR Pacific Telephone 4515 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 RONALD VALENTINE Cole Information Services 2006 LEHMANN Louis J Haines Company VALENTINE Janet 00 S Haines Company 1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1995 Lehmann Louis J Pacific Bell 1985 LEHMANN LOUIS J Pacific Bell 1980 LEHMANN LOUIS J WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 LEHMANN LOUIS J Pacific Telephone 1966 LEHMANN LOUIS J Pacific Telephone 1960 LEHMANN LOUIS J Pacific Telephone 1957 LEHMANN JACK R Pacific Telephone 4520 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 MUNRO KREINIK Cole Information Services 2009 MUNRO KREINIK Cole Information Services 2006 KREINIK Munro Haines Company 2004 MUNRO KREINIK Cole Information Services 1999 MUNRO KREINIK Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 48 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4521 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 ISAMU WATANABE Cole Information Services 2009 ISAMU WATANABE Cole Information Services 2006 WATANABEIsamu Haines Company 2004 WATANABE NURSERY Cole Information Services ISAMU WATANABE Cole Information Services 1999 ISAMU WATANABE Cole Information Services 1995 Watanabe Isamu Pacific Bell Wafanabe J LH Pacific Bell 1994 WATANABE, ISAMU Cole Information Services 1985 WATANABE ISAMU Pacific Bell WATANABE ISAMU Pacific Bell 1980 WATANABE ISAMU WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 WATANABE ISAMU Pacific Telephone 1966 HOLMAN KYLE T Pacific Telephone 1960 HOLMAN KYLE T Pacific Telephone 4524 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 1985 JACKSON WALTER REV Pacific Bell 1980 DE MACIAS ANTHONY WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 4527 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2009 EMILIANO CORLETO Cole Information Services 2006 CORLETO Margarita Haines Company 2004 EMILIANO CORLETO Cole Information Services 1999 EMILIANO CORLETO Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1985 HOLMAN M A Pacific Bell 1980 HOLMAN M A WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 HOLMAN M A Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 49 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1966 HOLMAN M A MRS Pacific Telephone 1960 HOLMAN M A MRS Pacific Telephone 1957 HOLMAN M A MRS Pacific Telephone 4530 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2006 ASHLEY J Haines Company 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1980 MARTIN MAXWELL WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1966 MARTER GARY N Pacific Telephone 1957 SPIARS W H Pacific Telephone 4533 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 JIAN CHEN Cole Information Services 2009 CHUE CHING Cole Information Services 2006 CHUE Ching Haines Company CHING Chue Man Haines Company 2004 CHUE CHING Cole Information Services 1999 CHUE CHING Cole Information Services 1975 ANTHONY HILBERT H Pacific Telephone 1960 SMITH FRED C Pacific Telephone 4534 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 1985 DE MACIAS ANTHONY Pacific Bell 1980 WAGNER RICHARD A WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 WAGNER RICHARD A Pacific Telephone 1960 BLUNT EDNA A Pacific Telephone 1957 BLUNT EDNA A R Pacific Telephone 4539 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 KEJIAN CHEN Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 50 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2009 KEJIAN CHEN Cole Information Services 2006 KE Jian Haines Company CHEN Kejlan Haines Company 2004 KEJIAN CHEN Cole Information Services 1999 KEJIAN CHEN Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1994 RIVAS, HILARIA Cole Information Services 1985 VIQUEZ ROBERTO Pacific Bell 1960 FISHER FRANK MRS Pacific Telephone FISHER FRANK MRS Pacific Telephone 1957 FISHER FRANK MRS Pacific Telephone 4542 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 THI TRINH Cole Information Services WOON LUI Cole Information Services 2009 SUEN WOON Cole Information Services WOON LUI Cole Information Services 2006 WOON Suen Haines Company TRINHHon Haines Company 2004 SHU LIN Cole Information Services 1999 WOON LUI Cole Information Services SUEN WOON Cole Information Services 1994 ESTRADA, E J Cole Information Services HERNANDEZ, HECTOR Cole Information Services 1985 GUTIERREZ ALBERTO Pacific Bell SANCHEZ CONCRETE WORKS Pacific Bell 1980 GUTIERREZ ALBERTO WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 BULLIS ROY E Pacific Telephone 1966 BULLIS G H MRS Pacific Telephone 1960 BULLIS ROY H Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 51 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4546 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 RAFAEL ARELLANO Cole Information Services 2009 RAFAEL ARELLANO Cole Information Services 2006 ARELLANORafael Haines Company 2004 FELIPE HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services 1999 RAFAEL ARELLANO Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1980 WARLOCK ROBT WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 WARLOCK ROBT Pacific Telephone 1966 WARLICK ROBT Pacific Telephone 4552 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 RALPH ARELLANO Cole Information Services 2009 RALPH ARELLANO Cole Information Services 2006 ARELLANO Ralph Haines Company 2004 RAFAEL ARELLANO Cole Information Services YOLANDA MARTINEZ Cole Information Services 1999 RALPH ARELLANO Cole Information Services 1995 Arellano Ralph Pacific Bell 1994 ARELLANO, RALPH Cole Information Services 1980 CHAPIN ROBT O WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 CHAPIN ROBT D Pacific Telephone 1960 BLUM GERALDINE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1957 NELSON BRUCE MRS Pacific Telephone 4703 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 PAUL HORN Cole Information Services 2009 TOP DANCE SHOES INC Cole Information Services REI INTERNATIONAL INC Cole Information Services PAUL HORN Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 52 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1999 PAUL HORN Cole Information Services 1985 HARTONOVYCH PETER Pacific Bell 1980 HARTONOVYCH PETER WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 HARTONOVYCH PETER Pacific Telephone 4709 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 DONABELLE HOPP Cole Information Services 2009 DONABELLE HOPP Cole Information Services 2006 HOPPMercell Haines Company 2004 DONABELLE HOPP Cole Information Services 1999 DONABELLE HOPP Cole Information Services 1994 HOPP, MERCEIL J Cole Information Services 1985 HOPP M J Pacific Bell 1981 CARTER WILLIS L ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1980 CARTER WILLIS L WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1976 Carter Willis L Pacific Telephone 1975 CARTER WILLIS L Pacific Telephone 1971 Carter Willis L Pacific Telephone 4715 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 LUCIO GOMEZ Cole Information Services 2009 LUCIO PEREZ Cole Information Services 2006 RUVALCABA Zenaido Haines Company GOMEZAdam Haines Company 2004 ADAM GOMEZ Cole Information Services 1999 TONG HA Cole Information Services LUCIO PEREZ Cole Information Services 6684447-5 Page 53 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4716 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 LINDA KILPATRICK Cole Information Services 2009 LINDA KILPATRICK Cole Information Services 2004 LINDA KILPATRICK Cole Information Services 1999 LINDA KILPATRICK Cole Information Services 1975 KILPATRICK BILL Pacific Telephone 1966 WADDLE WALTER L Pacific Telephone 4720 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 KEVIN MERENDA Cole Information Services 2009 MARY MERENDA Cole Information Services 2006 MERENDAMary Haines Company 1999 MARY MERENDA Cole Information Services OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1966 BACON JAS L Pacific Telephone 1960 MAURER JOHN Pacific Telephone 4723 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 LENH PHAM Cole Information Services 2009 RICARDO GARCIA Cole Information Services 2006 GARCIA Ricardo Haines Company 2004 RICARDO GARCIA Cole Information Services 1999 RICARDO GARCIA Cole Information Services 1995 Garcia Ricardo Jr Pacific Bell 1975 ROSATO JERRY Pacific Telephone 1966 RODRIGUEZ RITA M Pacific Telephone RODRIGUEZ RENE G Pacific Telephone 1960 FELLOWS MARJORIE B Pacific Telephone 1957 FELLOWS MARJORIE B R Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 54 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4726 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2009 ROBERT HINOSTRO Cole Information Services 2004 ROBERT HINOSTRO Cole Information Services 1999 ROBERT HINOSTRO Cole Information Services 1995 Lamb Peter Pacific Bell Lamb R Mon Pacific Bell Lamb Paul E Pacific Bell 1994 LAMB, PAUL E Cole Information Services 1985 LAMB PAUL E Pacific Bell 1980 LAMB PAUL E WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 LAMB PAUL E Pacific Telephone 1960 TRYONOVIECH FRANK J Pacific Telephone 4729 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 JIM RICKMAN Cole Information Services GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Cole Information Services 2004 GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Cole Information Services JIM RICKMAN Cole Information Services 1999 GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Cole Information Services 1995 Rickman Jim Pacific Bell Green Earth Landscaping Pacific Bell 1985 RICKMAN JIM Pacific Bell RICKMAN JIM Pacific Bell RICKMAN BARBARA Pacific Bell GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Pacific Bell 1980 RICKMAN JIM WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 PORTER ERROL E Pacific Telephone 1957 BECKSTEAD D O Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 55 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 4732 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 YOLANDA PADILLA Cole Information Services 2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 2006 PADILLA AIfredo Haines Company 2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services 1966 DELGADILLO RICHARD S Pacific Telephone 1960 DELGADILLO RICHARD S Pacific Telephone 1957 DELGADILLO RICHARD S Pacific Telephone 4740 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 2015 BENSON TRAN Cole Information Services 2009 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services 2006 TRAN Cuong Quan Haines Company CUONG Quan Haines Company 2004 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services 1999 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services 1995 Buranen Amy Pacific Bell Buranday Leonardo P Pacific Bell 1994 BURANDAY, L P Cole Information Services 1985 BURANDAY LEONARDO P Pacific Bell 1980 BURANDAY LEONARDO P WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 1975 GLISSON TERRY H Pacific Telephone 1966 NOLIN GEO H Pacific Telephone NOLIN ROSE MARIE Pacific Telephone 1957 PATERSON THOS Pacific Telephone 4533 1/2 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 HOGSTON WAITER Pacific Telephone 4542 1/2 WALNUT GROVE AVE Year Uses Source 1985 PRECIADO SANTIAGO P Pacific Bell 6684447-5 Page 56 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 PRECIADO SANTIAGO P WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone 6684447-5 Page 57 FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4432 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4436 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4436 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4437 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4437 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4440 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4440 LA PRESA AVE 2009, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4440 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4443 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4443 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4443 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4446 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4446 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4446 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4447 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4447 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4447 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4450 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4450 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4450 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4453 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4453 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4456 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4456 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4456 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4457 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4457 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4457 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4461 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4461 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4461 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4462 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4462 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4462 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4465 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4465 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4465 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4465 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4465 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4469 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4469 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4471 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4471 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4473 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4473 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4477 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4477 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4481 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4481 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4485 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4485 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4489 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4489 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4493 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4493 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4497 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4497 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4503 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4503 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4506 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4509 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4509 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2009, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4512 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4512 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4512 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4512 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4515 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4515 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4515 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4515 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4516 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4516 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4518 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4518 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4518 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4520 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4520 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4520 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4521 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4521 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4522 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4522 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4523 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4523 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4523 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4523 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4524 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4524 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4524 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4524 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4526 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4526 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4527 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4527 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4528 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4528 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4528 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4529 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4529 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4529 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4529 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4529 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4530 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4530 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4530 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4532 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4532 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4532 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4532 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4532 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4533 1/2 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4533 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4533 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4534 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4535 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4535 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4535 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4536 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4536 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4538 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4538 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4538 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4539 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4539 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4539 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4539 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4539 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4542 1/2 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4542 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4542 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4542 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4542 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4544 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4544 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4545 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4545 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4545 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4546 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4546 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4548 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4548 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4549 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4549 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4550 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4550 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4552 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4552 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4552 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4552 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4558 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4558 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4561 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4561 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4598 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4602 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4602 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4602 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4603 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4603 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4603 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4606 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4606 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4607 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4607 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4607 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4612 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4612 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4612 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4613 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4613 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4613 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4616 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4616 BARTLETT AVE 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4616 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4617 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4617 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4623 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4623 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4623 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4624 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4624 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4629 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4629 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4629 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4634 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4634 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4634 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4641 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4654 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4671 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4676 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4702 1/2 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4702 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4702 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4703 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4703 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4703 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4703 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4706 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4706 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4706 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4709 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4709 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1972, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4710 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4712 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4713 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4715 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4715 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4715 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4716 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4716 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4720 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4720 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4723 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4723 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4724 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4725 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4725 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4726 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4726 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4728 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4729 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4729 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4729 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 4732 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4732 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4732 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4735 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4740 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4740 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4741 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4745 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 4754 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 8504 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8504 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8512 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8512 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8516 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8516 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8520 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8520 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8526 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8526 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 8541 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8541 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8544 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8544 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8547 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8547 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8604 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8604 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8605 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8605 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 8610 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8610 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8610 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8610 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8611 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8611 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8616 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8616 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8617 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8617 BLUE CIR 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 8618 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8618 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8623 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8625 MISSION DR 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8630 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8630 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8632 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8632 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8634 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8634 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 8635 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8635 MISSION DR 2015, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8636 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8636 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8637 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8637 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8639 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8639 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8644 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8644 MISSION DR 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 8645 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8645 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8650 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8650 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8651 MISSION DR 2009, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8651 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8654 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8655 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8655 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8658 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 8658 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8701 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8701 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8702 MISSION DR 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8702 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8703 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8703 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8710 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 8714 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 8601 Mission Drive 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920 Remedial Excavation Completion Report 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 April 7, 2022 Prepared for: Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 735 East Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, California 92408 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT This document entitled Remedial Excavation Completion Report was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Borstein Enterprises (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Brian Viggiano, PG, Principal Geologist Approved by (signature) Kyle Emerson, CEG, Managing Principal Geologist REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 2.1 1.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LAND USE ............................................................. 2.1 2.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS .................................................................................... 2.1 3.0 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION .......................................................................................... 3.3 3.1 PRE-FIELD ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................. 3.3 3.1.1 South Coast Air Quality Management District Notification ........................... 3.3 3.1.2 Health and Safety ........................................................................................ 3.3 3.2 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES ....................................................................... 3.3 3.2.1 SCAQMD Rule 1466 Monitoring .................................................................. 3.4 3.2.2 Remedial Excavation .................................................................................. 3.5 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 4.6 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Summary of Post -Excavation Soil Chlordane Results Table 2 – PM10 Dust Monitoring Results LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Property Location Map Figure 2 – Site Map, Chlordane Analytical Results Figure 3 – Remedial Excavation LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A – SCAQMD Rule 1466 Notification Appendix B – Field and Data Monitoring Logs Appendix C – Waste Disposal Documents REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Introduction vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 2.1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) has prepared this Remedial Excavation Completion Report for the for the property located at 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive in the City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California (the Site or Property; Figure 1). Remedial excavation was performed based on the results of previous investigations which identified an isolated occurrence of the organochlorine pesticide (OCP) chlordane at concentrations that exceeded the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note 3 residential screening levels. As set forth below, remedial excavation and off-Site disposal of previously identified chlordane-impacted soil resulted in residual concentrations of chlordane at the Site to levels below residential DTSC screening levels. As a result of these remedial actions, no further action regarding chlordane-impacted soil is warranted at the Site. 1.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LAND USE The Property consists of three parcels of vacant land, totaling approximately 3.34 acres, addressed as 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California (the “Property”). Surrounding property uses consists of residential to the north, east, and south, and vacant land and a plant nursery to the west. A Property location map is illustrated on Figure 1. A Property map illustrating the main features of the Property is provided as Figure 2. 1.2 PROPERTY GEOLOGY The Property is located in Los Angeles County. The area is located within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province, which includes northwest-southeast trending mountain ranges and valleys that have been developed by the San Andreas Fault system (California Geological Survey [CGS], 2002). The stratigraphy underlying the vicinity of the Property consists primarily of recent-age alluvium (CDMG, 1965). The geology in the area of the Property consists of unconsolidated alluvium overlying marine sedimentary bedrock. The bedrock sequence with increasing depth consists of the Pico, Puente, and Topanga Formations, and the Santa Monica Slate basement complex. The Property area alluvium primarily consists of relatively fine-grained sediments with less prevalent layers of coarse-grained sediments. The closest mapped recently active fault is the Rio Hondo Fault located approximately 2 miles southeast (CGS, 2010). According to official maps of California, the Site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo (AP) Earthquake Fault Zone boundary but is within a liquefaction zone (CDMG, 2000). REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Introduction vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 2.2 1.3 PROPERTY HYDROGEOLOGY The Property is located within the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin. The basin is located within the eastern portion of Los Angeles County and includes most of San Gabriel Valley and part of the Santa Ana Valley. The basin is constrained by bedrock and faults on all sides. Several aquifers are present in the basin and water-bearing units consist of Holocene alluvium up to 4,100 feet in thickness and Pleistocene marine deposits up to 2,000 feet in thickness (Department of Water Resources [DWR], 2004). Three distinct groundwater zones occur in the Property area: shallow, intermediate, and deep. The shallow groundwater zone is the first-encountered groundwater. Each groundwater zone generally dips to the southeast. Although there is considerably variability in the area of the Property, the transition between groundwater zones is typically observed between 200 and 250 feet below ground surface (bgs) for the shallow and intermediate zones, and between 450 and 650 feet bgs for the intermediate and deep zones (EPA, 2009). Currently, the depth to groundwater is expected to range from 190 to 365 feet bgs in Property Area. (EPA, 2016). REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Previous Investigations vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 2.1 2.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS According to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by Stantec dated October 6, 2021, the Property appeared to have been used for agricultural purposes between circa 1928 and the mid-1950s. Historical agricultural use can be a potential concern due to the possible use of pesticides and herbicides containing heavy metals. Stantec identified this historical agricultural use as a recognized environmental condition (REC) in the Phase I ESA. Accordingly, Stantec recommended collection of shallow soil samples for chemical analysis to determine if organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) or heavy metals (lead and arsenic), typically associated with herbicides, were present at levels that represent an environmental concern to residential development of the Property. On October 20, 2021, Stantec advanced ten (10) shallow borings to three (3) feet below ground surface (bgs) across the Property identified as HA-01 through HA-10 of Figure 2 attached. Soil samples were collected at the 0.5-1.0-foot interval, 1.5-2.0-feet interval, and the 2.5-3.0-feet interval in each boring. The shallow soil samples (0.5-1.0-foot) from each boring were analyzed for OCPs by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) test method 8081A and arsenic and lead by USEPA test method 6010B. Initial Phase II ESA Soil Results The ten soil samples (one from each soil boring completed) were analyzed from the 1-ft depth interval had detections of arsenic at concentrations ranging from 1.3 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 8.3 mg/kg. These concentrations are within the naturally occurring background level of 0.5 to 11.0 mg/kg for arsenic as presented in published documents recognized by the State of California. Additionally, all ten soil samples collected from the 1-ft interval had detections of lead at concentrations between 6.3 and 75 mg/kg. These concentrations are below the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) Note 3 regulatory residential screening level of 80 mg/kg and below the United States Department of Environmental Protection (USEPA) Regulatory Screening Level of 400 mg/kg. Therefore, lead and arsenic are not considered an environmental concern to the Property and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding these metals on the Property. Minor detections of OCPs were detected including 4,4-DDT at samples HA-01 through HA-04 ranging between 0.0022 and 0.0064 mg/kg and 4,4’-DDE at HA-02 at 0.0082 mg/kg. Dieldrin was reported at peak levels of 0.0024 mg/kg at HA-02. These detections were below their respective regulatory screening levels for 4,4-DDT, 4,4-DDE, and dieldrin, and the cumulative total of DDT and DDE are below the California hazardous waste level of 1.0 mg/kg. Chlordane, alpha-chlordane, and gamma-chlordane were detected at boring location HA-07-1 at 3.4 mg/kg, 0.29 mg/kg, and 0.4 mg/kg, respectively at one foot in depth. Chlordane exceeded the HERO Note 3 residential screening level of 1.7 mg/kg at this one location in the surface soil sample. To determine the depth of migration of the chlordane and related compounds, the soil samples from 2 and 3 feet bgs were REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Previous Investigations vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 2.2 also analyzed for OCPs from boring HA-07. The results indicated that chlordane was detected in the samples collected at the 2 and 3-foot intervals from boring HA-07 at 2.9 and 5.0 mg/kg, respectively. Based on the surrounding borings (HA-05, HA-08, and HA-09), where chlordane was not detected, the lateral limits appeared to be localized to boring HA-07. Given the soil samples collected from boring HA-07 the vertical limits of impact above the residential screening level have not been defined to a depth of three (3) feet bgs. Additional investigations were recommended to better evaluate the vertical and lateral limits of impact. On November 29, 2021, Stantec completed an Additional Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report, which provided the results of additional investigation to define the lateral and vertical limits of chlordane impacts at soil boring HA-07. To complete this assessment, one boring was completed adjacent to the boring HA-07 and was drilled to a depth of five (5) bgs. In total, eight additional step-out borings were completed surrounding HA-07. These step-out borings were placed as shown on Figure 2 (attached) and identified as boring HA-07 and borings HA-11 through HA-18. Soil samples were collected at depths of four and five feet bgs in boring HA-07 and at one, three, and five feet bgs in borings HA-11 through HA-18, when refusal did not occur. Each soil sample was analyzed from the immediately adjacent step-out borings (HA-11, HA-13, HA-15, and HA-17) from the depth at which samples were collected. The laboratory analysis reported no chlordane in any of the samples collected from boring HA-07 at a depth of four (4) and five (5) feet bgs at concentrations above the HERO Note 3 levels of 1.7 mg/kg for residential use. Therefore, the vertical limits of the chlordane were constrained to less than four feet bgs. The soil samples collected from step-out borings HA-11, HA-13, HA-15, and HA-17 also reported no chlordane above the HERO Note 3 levels of 1.7 mg/kg for residential use. All other organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) were either reported below laboratory reporting levels or were “non-detect”. Based on the analytical results generated by this Additional Phase II ESA, chlordane above the 1.7 mg/kg residential screening level is present surrounding boring HA-07 and outward less than 20 feet in all directions. The vertical limit appears to be less than four feet bgs in depth. Based on these vertical and lateral limits, Stantec estimates the quantity of soil present on the property that contains chlordane above the residential screening level of 1.7 mg/kg surrounding boring HA-07 amounts to approximately 300 cubic yards or less, which should be removed from the Property prior to site development activities. Except as noted above, no additional impacts to soil were identified on the subject Property that would require further assessment or remedial action and Stantec recommends no further action or investigation regarding the environmental condition of the Property. REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Remedial Excavation vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 3.3 3.0 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION The scope of work conducted during this remedial action consisted of the following general elements: 1. Pre-Field activities: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and update to the Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan; 2. Remedial Excavation, air monitoring, waste profiling, and off-site disposal. The following sections describe the implemented scope of work. 3.1 PRE-FIELD ACTIVITIES 3.1.1 South Coast Air Quality Management District Notification Initial notification to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) was made a minimum of 72 hours in advance of excavation work on March 17, 2022, and the Site was issued a Notification No. of 5275. The notification was processed on March 24, 2022, and notification number of 692790 was assigned to the Site. A copy of the email confirmation from SCAQMD is included in Appendix A. 3.1.2 Health and Safety The existing Site-specific health and safety plan (HASP) was updated to include work elements associated with the remedial excavation and provided to DTSC for review and approval prior to implementation of the remedial action. That HASP presented controls and procedures to be implemented to minimize incidents, injury, and health risks associated with the excavation and exposure to chemicals of potential concern (COPCs). The completed HASP was prepared in accordance with OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations Standards (29 CFR 1910.120 and CCR Title 8). A copy of the referenced HASP was maintained on-Site with the Stantec representative for reference during all remediation activities. All field personnel were required to review the HASP prior to commencement of field work. Prior to the initialization of daily field activities, a safety meeting was conducted at the Property. All on-Site workers were required to sign the daily safety meeting attendance log. 3.2 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES Remedial excavation was conducted to remove identified Site soil with concentrations of chlordane that exceeded the DTSC HERO Note 3 residential screening level of 1.7 mg/Kg. As depicted on Figure 2 and Figure 3, the lateral limits of impact were defined by soil borings HA-11, HA-13, and HA-15. The vertical limit of impact was defined by soil boring HA-07. The soil borings were used to constrain the excavation limits to approximately 40 feet by 40 feet by 4 feet deep. Soil analytical results are presented on Table 1 and Figure 3. REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Remedial Excavation vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 3.4 3.2.1 SCAQMD Rule 1466 Monitoring In accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1466 (Rule), dust monitoring and administrative procedures were implemented during the remedial action. The rule requires ambient PM10 monitoring, dust control measures, notification, signage and record keeping requirements when conducting earth-moving activities of soil with applicable toxic air contaminants (chlordane). To comply with the rule, signage was posted indicating Site contact information and contaminants of concern (chlordane) at all sides of the Property. Signage indicating a maximum speed limit for on-Site vehicles of five mile per hour (MPH) was also posted at the entrance to the property. In addition, to monitor ambient upwind and downwind particulate concentrations, two particulate dust monitors (DustTrack DRX) capable of logging PM10 dust concentrations at one-minute intervals were placed at the approximate upwind and downwind property boundaries. Per Rule 1466, the upwind monitor is indicative of background (or ambient) PM10 levels and is not generally influenced by fugitive dust sources from the Site. In accordance with Rule 1466 PM10 dust concentrations were calculated by subtracting the results of the upwind monitor from the downwind monitor and evaluated on a 120-minute rolling average. Table 2 presents PM10 measurements and the 120-minute rolling averages calculated in accordance with Rule 1466. As calculated above, based on the 120-minute rolling average, no fugitive PM10 concentrations in excess of 25 µg/m3 above ambient background were measured during earth-moving activities. Stantec notes that on March 28, 2022, the upwind monitor was knocked over between approximately 7:20 AM and 7:35 AM. As a result, the upwind measurements during this time period are not reflective of actual Site conditions; however, downwind PM10 measurements during this time period are all less than 25 ug/m3 A weather station capable of measuring windspeed and direction was placed within the Site boundaries to monitor wind parameters. Furthermore, an SCAQMD certified Dust Supervisor was on-Site during all required earth-moving activities. Records were kept to document both the absence of dust particulate concentrations in excess of actionable thresholds, and the earth-moving activities at the Site. The following logs were kept to document the earthmoving activities: • Rule 1466 Earth-moving activity logs; • Rule 1466 Instrument logs; • Rule 1466 PM10 Monitoring Logs; and • Rule 1466 Stockpile Logs. Copies of field logs and data logs from the dust monitors are included in Appendix B. REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Remedial Excavation vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 3.5 3.2.2 Remedial Excavation Removal of impacted soil was conducted on March 28, 2022, by B&D Construction Co., Inc. (B&D). B&D is a licensed California contractor with the following certifications and certifications and permits: • CAL/OSHA Permit, 2002-901875 • Contractor's License, 776709 & 326942: o A-General Engineering Contractor; o C21-Building Moving, Demolition; o HAZ-Hazardous Substances Removal; • Hazardous Substance Removal Actions Certification, A-8031 & A-3948 • Annual Transportation Permit • Motor Carrier Permit, 75355 • Dept. Toxic Substances Control, 3374 • SCAQMD 1166, 402539 • Environmental Protection Agency, 372284 • Environmental Protection Agency, 93081 Excavation was conducted to remove soil in an approximately 40-foot by 40-foot by 5-foot-deep volume bounded by soil borings HA-11, HA-17, HA-13, HA-15, and HA-07 (Figure 3) which previously defined the limits of excavation. Remedial excavation was conducted using a hydraulic excavator to remove soils to targeted removal depths and relocating removed soils to a plastic-lined stockpile constructed to be less than 400 cubic yards in size and no more than six (6) feet in height, in accordance with Rule 1466 permit requirements. The stockpile was subsequently covered with plastic sheeting to limit fugitive dust emissions and run off, labeled, and recorded on Stockpile Logs (Appendix C). In total, approximately 300 cubic yards (516 tons) of soil were excavated, profiled as non-hazardous and disposed off-Site to the Waste Management – Azusa Landfill, located at 1211 West Gladstone, Azusa, California. Figure 3 provides the final remedial excavation boundaries and the soil boring data used to confirm removal of the impacted soil. Copies of the non-hazardous waste manifests, tonnage summary and weight tickets, waste profile documentation, and stockpile sample analytical results are included in Appendix C. As depicted on Figures 2 and 3, and summarized on Table 1, all remaining reported soil chlordane concentrations are below the residential DTSC HERO Note 3 screening level of 1.7 mg/Kg. Based on these results, no additional investigation or remedial actions are recommended for the identified chlordane soil impacts. REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT Conclusions and Recommendations vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 4.6 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On March 28, 2022, Stantec oversaw the excavation and removal of approximately 300 cu yds of impacted soil at the Site. The excavation was conducted to remove soil contaminated with chlordane above the DTSC HERO Note 3 residential screening level of 1.7 mg/Kg to a maximum depth of 5 feet bgs. Soil was excavated laterally to predefined soil boring locations which demonstrated concentrations of chlordane below the DTSC HERO Note 3 screening level. Post remediation site-wide reported chlordane levels are presented on Figure 2 and Figure 3, and tabulated on Table 2. All reported post remediation chlordane concentrations are below residential screening levels. As such, no further action with respect to chlordane impacts in soil is warranted. In total, approximately 300 cubic yards (516 tons) of soil were excavated, profiled as non-hazardous and disposed off-Site to the Waste Management – Azusa Landfill, located at 1211 West Gladstone, Azusa, California. Copies of the non-hazardous waste manifests, tonnage summary and weight tickets, waste profile documentation, and stockpile sample analytical results are included in Appendix C. The results of the completed remedial excavation activities document the complete removal of impacted soils above DTSC HERO Note 3 screening levels at the Site. Accordingly, based on the above, the remedial excavation is deemed complete and no further remedial action is recommended. TABLES Table 1Summary of Post-Excavation Soil Chlordane Results(mg/Kg)8601 and 8623 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770Stantec Project No.: 18505355Chlordane1.71.7HA-01-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-02-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-03-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-04-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-05-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-06-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-07-4 4 11/11/20210.019HA-07-5 5 11/11/20210.083HA-08-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.0085HA-09-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.0085HA-10-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.0085HA-11-1 1 11/11/20210.068HA-11-3 3 11/11/2021 <0.0085HA-11-5 5 11/11/2021 <0.0085HA-13-1 1 11/11/20211.6HA-13-3 3 11/11/20210.38HA-15-1 1 11/11/20210.31HA-15-3 3 11/11/20210.11HA-15-5 5 11/11/20210.05HA-17-1 1 11/11/20210.03HA-17-3 3 11/11/20210.028Notes: All concentrations reported in miligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).(1) - More conservative screening level between USEPA Region 9 RSL (May, 2021) and DTSC HERO Note 3 (June, 2020).DTSC - Department of Toxic Substance ControlHERO HHRA - Human and Ecological Risk Office Human Health Risk AssessmentRSL - Regional Screening LevelUSEPA - United States Environmental Protection AgencyOCPs - Organochlorine PesticidesOCPs by 8081AUSEPA RSLs (Residential)DTSC HERO Note 3 (Residential)Sample IDSample Depth (feet)Sample Date Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) 3/28/2022 7:02:58 38 7:03:22 74 36 3/28/2022 7:03:58 249 7:04:22 39 -210 3/28/2022 7:04:58 55 7:05:22 16 -39 3/28/2022 7:05:58 27 7:06:22 15 -12 3/28/2022 7:06:58 52 7:07:22 15 -37 3/28/2022 7:07:58 45 7:08:22 15 -30 3/28/2022 7:08:58 28 7:09:22 15 -13 3/28/2022 7:09:58 21 7:10:22 15 -6 3/28/2022 7:10:58 25 7:11:22 15 -10 3/28/2022 7:11:58 22 7:12:22 15 -7 3/28/2022 7:12:58 21 7:13:22 14 -7 3/28/2022 7:13:58 116 7:14:22 14 -102 3/28/2022 7:14:58 38 7:15:22 14 -24 3/28/2022 7:15:58 21 7:16:22 14 -7 3/28/2022 7:16:58 16 7:17:22 14 -2 3/28/2022 7:17:58 68 7:18:22 14 -54 3/28/2022 7:18:58 32 7:19:22 13 -19 3/28/2022 7:19:58 6110 7:20:22 14 -6096 3/28/2022 7:20:58 123 7:21:22 14 -109 3/28/2022 7:21:58 58 7:22:22 13 -45 3/28/2022 7:22:58 33 7:23:22 14 -19 3/28/2022 7:23:58 53 7:24:22 14 -39 3/28/2022 7:24:58 63 7:25:22 14 -49 3/28/2022 7:25:58 70 7:26:22 14 -56 3/28/2022 7:26:58 30 7:27:22 13 -17 3/28/2022 7:27:58 21 7:28:22 14 -7 3/28/2022 7:28:58 20 7:29:22 13 -7 3/28/2022 7:29:58 17 7:30:22 13 -4 3/28/2022 7:30:58 16 7:31:22 13 -3 3/28/2022 7:31:58 25 7:32:22 13 -12 3/28/2022 7:32:58 23 7:33:22 13 -10 3/28/2022 7:33:58 74 7:34:22 12 -62 3/28/2022 7:34:58 127 7:35:22 12 -115 3/28/2022 7:35:58 27 7:36:22 12 -15 3/28/2022 7:36:58 19 7:37:22 12 -7 3/28/2022 7:37:58 20 7:38:22 11 -9 3/28/2022 7:38:58 21 7:39:22 10 -11 3/28/2022 7:39:58 20 7:40:22 11 -9 3/28/2022 7:40:58 26 7:41:22 12 -14 3/28/2022 7:41:58 23 7:42:22 12 -11 3/28/2022 7:42:58 20 7:43:22 12 -8 Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 3/28/2022 7:43:58 31 7:44:22 12 -19 3/28/2022 7:44:58 47 7:45:22 13 -34 3/28/2022 7:45:58 21 7:46:22 12 -9 3/28/2022 7:46:58 20 7:47:22 11 -9 3/28/2022 7:47:58 19 7:48:22 12 -7 3/28/2022 7:48:58 21 7:49:22 12 -9 3/28/2022 7:49:58 18 7:50:22 12 -6 3/28/2022 7:50:58 17 7:51:22 11 -6 3/28/2022 7:51:58 16 7:52:22 11 -5 3/28/2022 7:52:58 23 7:53:22 11 -12 3/28/2022 7:53:58 19 7:54:22 11 -8 3/28/2022 7:54:58 24 7:55:22 11 -13 3/28/2022 7:55:58 21 7:56:22 11 -10 3/28/2022 7:56:58 22 7:57:22 11 -11 3/28/2022 7:57:58 16 7:58:22 10 -6 3/28/2022 7:58:58 20 7:59:22 11 -9 3/28/2022 7:59:58 20 8:00:22 10 -10 3/28/2022 8:00:58 31 8:01:22 11 -20 3/28/2022 8:01:58 17 8:02:22 11 -6 3/28/2022 8:02:58 20 8:03:22 10 -10 3/28/2022 8:03:58 18 8:04:22 10 -8 3/28/2022 8:04:58 17 8:05:22 10 -7 3/28/2022 8:05:58 19 8:06:22 10 -9 3/28/2022 8:06:58 22 8:07:22 10 -12 3/28/2022 8:07:58 33 8:08:22 9 -24 3/28/2022 8:08:58 23 8:09:22 10 -13 3/28/2022 8:09:58 34 8:10:22 10 -24 3/28/2022 8:10:58 27 8:11:22 9 -18 3/28/2022 8:11:58 20 8:12:22 10 -10 3/28/2022 8:12:58 18 8:13:22 10 -8 3/28/2022 8:13:58 42 8:14:22 9 -33 3/28/2022 8:14:58 18 8:15:22 10 -8 3/28/2022 8:15:58 19 8:16:22 10 -9 3/28/2022 8:16:58 21 8:17:22 9 -12 3/28/2022 8:17:58 17 8:18:22 9 -8 3/28/2022 8:18:58 19 8:19:22 10 -9 3/28/2022 8:19:58 17 8:20:22 9 -8 3/28/2022 8:20:58 17 8:21:22 9 -8 3/28/2022 8:21:58 22 8:22:22 10 -12 3/28/2022 8:22:58 14 8:23:22 9 -5 3/28/2022 8:23:58 19 8:24:22 9 -10 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 3/28/2022 8:24:58 22 8:25:22 9 -13 3/28/2022 8:25:58 18 8:26:22 9 -9 3/28/2022 8:26:58 26 8:27:22 10 -16 3/28/2022 8:27:58 18 8:28:22 10 -8 3/28/2022 8:28:58 25 8:29:22 10 -15 3/28/2022 8:29:58 42 8:30:22 9 -33 3/28/2022 8:30:58 26 8:31:22 9 -17 3/28/2022 8:31:58 19 8:32:22 9 -10 3/28/2022 8:32:58 19 8:33:22 10 -9 3/28/2022 8:33:58 19 8:34:22 9 -10 3/28/2022 8:34:58 16 8:35:22 9 -7 3/28/2022 8:35:58 21 8:36:22 9 -12 3/28/2022 8:36:58 18 8:37:22 10 -8 3/28/2022 8:37:58 17 8:38:22 9 -8 3/28/2022 8:38:58 18 8:39:22 9 -9 3/28/2022 8:39:58 17 8:40:22 9 -8 3/28/2022 8:40:58 18 8:41:22 8 -10 3/28/2022 8:41:58 18 8:42:22 8 -10 3/28/2022 8:42:58 12 8:43:22 8 -4 3/28/2022 8:43:58 10 8:44:22 8 -2 3/28/2022 8:44:58 20 8:45:22 7 -13 3/28/2022 8:45:58 16 8:46:22 8 -8 3/28/2022 8:46:58 19 8:47:22 8 -11 3/28/2022 8:47:58 12 8:48:22 8 -4 3/28/2022 8:48:58 15 8:49:22 8 -7 3/28/2022 8:49:58 20 8:50:22 7 -13 3/28/2022 8:50:58 23 8:51:22 8 -15 3/28/2022 8:51:58 14 8:52:22 8 -6 3/28/2022 8:52:58 14 8:53:22 8 -6 3/28/2022 8:53:58 16 8:54:22 7 -9 3/28/2022 8:54:58 12 8:55:22 6 -6 3/28/2022 8:55:58 9 8:56:22 6 -3 3/28/2022 8:56:58 18 8:57:22 7 -11 3/28/2022 8:57:58 18 8:58:22 6 -12 3/28/2022 8:58:58 11 8:59:22 5 -6 3/28/2022 8:59:58 12 9:00:22 5 -7 3/28/2022 9:00:58 15 9:01:22 5 -10 3/28/2022 9:01:58 16 9:02:22 5 -11 -67.7 3/28/2022 9:02:58 13 9:03:22 5 -8 -68.1 3/28/2022 9:03:58 9 9:04:22 5 -4 -66.4 3/28/2022 9:04:58 15 9:05:22 6 -9 -66.1 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 3/28/2022 9:05:58 15 9:06:22 5 -10 -66.1 3/28/2022 9:06:58 24 9:07:22 5 -19 -66.0 3/28/2022 9:07:58 16 9:08:22 5 -11 -65.8 3/28/2022 9:08:58 22 9:09:22 6 -16 -65.8 3/28/2022 9:09:58 26 9:10:22 5 -21 -66.0 3/28/2022 9:10:58 15 9:11:22 6 -9 -65.9 3/28/2022 9:11:58 12 9:12:22 5 -7 -65.9 3/28/2022 9:12:58 13 9:13:22 5 -8 -66.0 3/28/2022 9:13:58 11 9:14:22 6 -5 -65.1 3/28/2022 9:14:58 11 9:15:22 5 -6 -65.0 3/28/2022 9:15:58 11 9:16:22 5 -6 -65.0 3/28/2022 9:16:58 11 9:17:22 6 -5 -65.0 3/28/2022 9:17:58 20 9:18:22 6 -14 -64.7 3/28/2022 9:18:58 16 9:19:22 5 -11 -64.6 3/28/2022 9:19:58 17 9:20:22 6 -11 -13.9 3/28/2022 9:20:58 16 9:21:22 5 -11 -13.1 3/28/2022 9:21:58 14 9:22:22 5 -9 -12.8 3/28/2022 9:22:58 12 9:23:22 6 -6 -12.7 3/28/2022 9:23:58 13 9:24:22 6 -7 -12.4 3/28/2022 9:24:58 14 9:25:22 6 -8 -12.1 3/28/2022 9:25:58 9 9:26:22 6 -3 -11.6 3/28/2022 9:26:58 8 9:27:22 6 -2 -11.5 3/28/2022 9:27:58 9 9:28:22 6 -3 -11.5 3/28/2022 9:28:58 13 9:29:22 6 -7 -11.5 3/28/2022 9:29:58 10 9:30:22 5 -5 -11.5 3/28/2022 9:30:58 14 9:31:22 6 -8 -11.5 3/28/2022 9:31:58 14 9:32:22 6 -8 -11.5 3/28/2022 9:32:58 10 9:33:22 6 -4 -11.4 3/28/2022 9:33:58 11 9:34:22 6 -5 -11.0 3/28/2022 9:34:58 11 9:35:22 5 -6 -10.1 3/28/2022 9:35:58 9 9:36:22 5 -4 -10.0 3/28/2022 9:36:58 17 9:37:22 6 -11 -10.0 3/28/2022 9:37:58 8 9:38:22 5 -3 -9.9 3/28/2022 9:38:58 8 9:39:22 5 -3 -9.9 3/28/2022 9:39:58 7 9:40:22 5 -2 -9.8 3/28/2022 9:40:58 10 9:41:22 5 -5 -9.7 3/28/2022 9:41:58 9 9:42:22 5 -4 -9.7 3/28/2022 9:42:58 8 9:43:22 6 -2 -9.6 3/28/2022 9:43:58 10 9:44:22 6 -4 -9.5 3/28/2022 9:44:58 8 9:45:22 5 -3 -9.3 3/28/2022 9:45:58 11 9:46:22 6 -5 -9.2 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 7:01:04 71 7:01:05 81 10 4/4/2022 7:02:04 68 7:02:05 77 9 4/4/2022 7:03:04 67 7:03:05 91 24 4/4/2022 7:04:04 67 7:04:05 72 5 4/4/2022 7:05:04 65 7:05:05 71 6 4/4/2022 7:06:04 64 7:06:05 68 4 4/4/2022 7:07:04 63 7:07:05 67 4 4/4/2022 7:08:04 63 7:08:05 67 4 4/4/2022 7:09:04 62 7:09:05 66 4 4/4/2022 7:10:04 61 7:10:05 65 4 4/4/2022 7:11:04 61 7:11:05 64 3 4/4/2022 7:12:04 61 7:12:05 62 1 4/4/2022 7:13:04 64 7:13:05 61 -3 4/4/2022 7:14:04 60 7:14:05 62 2 4/4/2022 7:15:04 61 7:15:05 61 0 4/4/2022 7:16:04 63 7:16:05 62 -1 4/4/2022 7:17:04 63 7:17:05 63 0 4/4/2022 7:18:04 63 7:18:05 63 0 4/4/2022 7:19:04 62 7:19:05 69 7 4/4/2022 7:20:04 62 7:20:05 63 1 4/4/2022 7:21:04 61 7:21:05 64 3 4/4/2022 7:22:04 61 7:22:05 64 3 4/4/2022 7:23:04 61 7:23:05 64 3 4/4/2022 7:24:04 61 7:24:05 63 2 4/4/2022 7:25:04 61 7:25:05 62 1 4/4/2022 7:26:04 59 7:26:05 64 5 4/4/2022 7:27:04 58 7:27:05 61 3 4/4/2022 7:28:04 58 7:28:05 60 2 4/4/2022 7:29:04 59 7:29:05 60 1 4/4/2022 7:30:04 59 7:30:05 61 2 4/4/2022 7:31:04 58 7:31:05 61 3 4/4/2022 7:32:04 57 7:32:05 60 3 4/4/2022 7:33:04 57 7:33:05 60 3 4/4/2022 7:34:04 58 7:34:05 62 4 4/4/2022 7:35:04 58 7:35:05 61 3 4/4/2022 7:36:04 60 7:36:05 61 1 4/4/2022 7:37:04 62 7:37:05 62 0 4/4/2022 7:38:04 64 7:38:05 66 2 4/4/2022 7:39:04 62 7:39:05 67 5 4/4/2022 7:40:04 62 7:40:05 66 4 4/4/2022 7:41:04 62 7:41:05 67 5 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 7:42:04 61 7:42:05 66 5 4/4/2022 7:43:04 61 7:43:05 66 5 4/4/2022 7:44:04 62 7:44:05 65 3 4/4/2022 7:45:04 62 7:45:05 64 2 4/4/2022 7:46:04 61 7:46:05 64 3 4/4/2022 7:47:04 62 7:47:05 64 2 4/4/2022 7:48:04 62 7:48:05 65 3 4/4/2022 7:49:04 62 7:49:05 64 2 4/4/2022 7:50:04 62 7:50:05 68 6 4/4/2022 7:51:04 61 7:51:05 67 6 4/4/2022 7:52:04 60 7:52:05 64 4 4/4/2022 7:53:04 60 7:53:05 62 2 4/4/2022 7:54:04 61 7:54:05 62 1 4/4/2022 7:55:04 61 7:55:05 63 2 4/4/2022 7:56:04 60 7:56:05 64 4 4/4/2022 7:57:04 59 7:57:05 62 3 4/4/2022 7:58:04 58 7:58:05 61 3 4/4/2022 7:59:04 59 7:59:05 63 4 4/4/2022 8:00:04 59 8:00:05 63 4 4/4/2022 8:01:04 59 8:01:05 65 6 4/4/2022 8:02:04 59 8:02:05 63 4 4/4/2022 8:03:04 59 8:03:05 63 4 4/4/2022 8:04:04 59 8:04:05 63 4 4/4/2022 8:05:04 58 8:05:05 69 11 4/4/2022 8:06:04 56 8:06:05 66 10 4/4/2022 8:07:04 56 8:07:05 64 8 4/4/2022 8:08:04 56 8:08:05 61 5 4/4/2022 8:09:04 55 8:09:05 60 5 4/4/2022 8:10:04 55 8:10:05 59 4 4/4/2022 8:11:04 55 8:11:05 64 9 4/4/2022 8:12:04 56 8:12:05 60 4 4/4/2022 8:13:04 55 8:13:05 59 4 4/4/2022 8:14:04 55 8:14:05 59 4 4/4/2022 8:15:04 55 8:15:05 59 4 4/4/2022 8:16:04 68 8:16:05 61 -7 4/4/2022 8:17:04 74 8:17:05 60 -14 4/4/2022 8:18:04 60 8:18:05 59 -1 4/4/2022 8:19:04 65 8:19:05 60 -5 4/4/2022 8:20:04 62 8:20:05 60 -2 4/4/2022 8:21:04 57 8:21:05 60 3 4/4/2022 8:22:04 57 8:22:05 61 4 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 8:23:04 56 8:23:05 59 3 4/4/2022 8:24:04 55 8:24:05 62 7 4/4/2022 8:25:04 55 8:25:05 57 2 4/4/2022 8:26:04 56 8:26:05 57 1 4/4/2022 8:27:04 56 8:27:05 58 2 4/4/2022 8:28:04 57 8:28:05 60 3 4/4/2022 8:29:04 58 8:29:05 62 4 4/4/2022 8:30:04 59 8:30:05 60 1 4/4/2022 8:31:04 59 8:31:05 61 2 4/4/2022 8:32:04 58 8:32:05 61 3 4/4/2022 8:33:04 57 8:33:05 60 3 4/4/2022 8:34:04 57 8:34:05 61 4 4/4/2022 8:35:04 58 8:35:05 60 2 4/4/2022 8:36:04 58 8:36:05 60 2 4/4/2022 8:37:04 58 8:37:05 60 2 4/4/2022 8:38:04 57 8:38:05 60 3 4/4/2022 8:39:04 57 8:39:05 59 2 4/4/2022 8:40:04 58 8:40:05 60 2 4/4/2022 8:41:04 59 8:41:05 59 0 4/4/2022 8:42:04 57 8:42:05 60 3 4/4/2022 8:43:04 56 8:43:05 59 3 4/4/2022 8:44:04 57 8:44:05 58 1 4/4/2022 8:45:04 57 8:45:05 59 2 4/4/2022 8:46:04 57 8:46:05 59 2 4/4/2022 8:47:04 56 8:47:05 59 3 4/4/2022 8:48:04 57 8:48:05 60 3 4/4/2022 8:49:04 59 8:49:05 60 1 4/4/2022 8:50:04 58 8:50:05 61 3 4/4/2022 8:51:04 59 8:51:05 62 3 4/4/2022 8:52:04 60 8:52:05 61 1 4/4/2022 8:53:04 61 8:53:05 62 1 4/4/2022 8:54:04 64 8:54:05 63 -1 4/4/2022 8:55:04 64 8:55:05 66 2 4/4/2022 8:56:04 64 8:56:05 67 3 4/4/2022 8:57:04 64 8:57:05 67 3 4/4/2022 8:58:04 64 8:58:05 67 3 4/4/2022 8:59:04 64 8:59:05 68 4 4/4/2022 9:00:04 63 9:00:05 68 5 3 4/4/2022 9:01:04 64 9:01:05 69 5 3 4/4/2022 9:02:04 64 9:02:05 66 2 3 4/4/2022 9:03:04 62 9:03:05 66 4 3 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 9:04:04 62 9:04:05 65 3 3 4/4/2022 9:05:04 61 9:05:05 65 4 3 4/4/2022 9:06:04 61 9:06:05 65 4 3 4/4/2022 9:07:04 61 9:07:05 65 4 3 4/4/2022 9:08:04 60 9:08:05 65 5 3 4/4/2022 9:09:04 60 9:09:05 65 5 3 4/4/2022 9:10:04 61 9:10:05 65 4 3 4/4/2022 9:11:04 61 9:11:05 65 4 3 4/4/2022 9:12:04 61 9:12:05 65 4 3 4/4/2022 9:13:04 61 9:13:05 64 3 3 4/4/2022 9:14:04 61 9:14:05 63 2 3 4/4/2022 9:15:04 61 9:15:05 63 2 3 4/4/2022 9:16:04 60 9:16:05 63 3 3 4/4/2022 9:17:04 60 9:17:05 64 4 3 4/4/2022 9:18:04 61 9:18:05 66 5 3 4/4/2022 9:19:04 60 9:19:05 63 3 3 4/4/2022 9:20:04 60 9:20:05 63 3 3 4/4/2022 9:21:04 60 9:21:05 63 3 3 4/4/2022 9:22:04 60 9:22:05 63 3 3 4/4/2022 9:23:04 60 9:23:05 64 4 3 4/4/2022 9:24:04 60 9:24:05 64 4 3 4/4/2022 9:25:04 60 9:25:05 64 4 3 4/4/2022 9:26:04 60 9:26:05 64 4 3 4/4/2022 9:27:04 64 9:27:05 64 0 3 4/4/2022 9:28:04 62 9:28:05 64 2 3 4/4/2022 9:29:04 62 9:29:05 64 2 3 4/4/2022 9:30:04 62 9:30:05 65 3 3 4/4/2022 9:31:04 62 9:31:05 67 5 3 4/4/2022 9:32:04 60 9:32:05 65 5 3 4/4/2022 9:33:04 60 9:33:05 65 5 3 4/4/2022 9:34:04 60 9:34:05 64 4 3 4/4/2022 9:35:04 59 9:35:05 64 5 3 4/4/2022 9:36:04 58 9:36:05 64 6 3 4/4/2022 9:37:04 59 9:37:05 63 4 3 4/4/2022 9:38:04 59 9:38:05 63 4 3 4/4/2022 9:39:04 59 9:39:05 63 4 3 4/4/2022 9:40:04 59 9:40:05 64 5 3 4/4/2022 9:41:04 58 9:41:05 63 5 3 4/4/2022 9:42:04 58 9:42:05 62 4 3 4/4/2022 9:43:04 58 9:43:05 61 3 3 4/4/2022 9:44:04 58 9:44:05 62 4 3 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 9:45:04 59 9:45:05 62 3 3 4/4/2022 9:46:04 59 9:46:05 60 1 3 4/4/2022 9:47:04 60 9:47:05 62 2 3 4/4/2022 9:48:04 58 9:48:05 61 3 3 4/4/2022 9:49:04 57 9:49:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 9:50:04 57 9:50:05 61 4 3 4/4/2022 9:51:04 58 9:51:05 62 4 3 4/4/2022 9:52:04 57 9:52:05 61 4 3 4/4/2022 9:53:04 57 9:53:05 62 5 3 4/4/2022 9:54:04 58 9:54:05 60 2 3 4/4/2022 9:55:04 58 9:55:05 60 2 3 4/4/2022 9:56:04 58 9:56:05 60 2 3 4/4/2022 9:57:04 58 9:57:05 60 2 3 4/4/2022 9:58:04 57 9:58:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 9:59:04 57 9:59:05 59 2 3 4/4/2022 10:00:04 57 10:00:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 10:01:04 57 10:01:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 10:02:04 58 10:02:05 61 3 3 4/4/2022 10:03:04 58 10:03:05 61 3 3 4/4/2022 10:04:04 59 10:04:05 60 1 3 4/4/2022 10:05:04 58 10:05:05 61 3 3 4/4/2022 10:06:04 58 10:06:05 60 2 3 4/4/2022 10:07:04 57 10:07:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 10:08:04 58 10:08:05 60 2 3 4/4/2022 10:09:04 57 10:09:05 59 2 3 4/4/2022 10:10:04 57 10:10:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 10:11:04 57 10:11:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 10:12:04 57 10:12:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 10:13:04 56 10:13:05 60 4 3 4/4/2022 10:14:04 56 10:14:05 59 3 3 4/4/2022 10:15:04 57 10:15:05 58 1 3 4/4/2022 10:16:04 57 10:16:05 58 1 3 4/4/2022 10:17:04 56 10:17:05 58 2 3 4/4/2022 10:18:04 57 10:18:05 60 3 3 4/4/2022 10:19:04 56 10:19:05 61 5 3 4/4/2022 10:20:04 56 10:20:05 59 3 3 4/4/2022 10:21:04 56 10:21:05 58 2 3 4/4/2022 10:22:04 56 10:22:05 59 3 3 4/4/2022 10:23:04 55 10:23:05 59 4 3 4/4/2022 10:24:04 55 10:24:05 59 4 3 4/4/2022 10:25:04 55 10:25:05 58 3 3 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 10:26:04 55 10:26:05 58 3 3 4/4/2022 10:27:04 55 10:27:05 57 2 3 4/4/2022 10:28:04 56 10:28:05 58 2 3 4/4/2022 10:29:04 55 10:29:05 58 3 3 4/4/2022 10:30:04 54 10:30:05 60 6 3 4/4/2022 10:31:04 53 10:31:05 57 4 3 4/4/2022 10:32:04 53 10:32:05 55 2 3 4/4/2022 10:33:04 53 10:33:05 81 28 3 4/4/2022 10:34:04 51 10:34:05 62 11 3 4/4/2022 10:35:04 51 10:35:05 54 3 3 4/4/2022 10:36:04 51 10:36:05 53 2 3 4/4/2022 10:37:04 51 10:37:05 54 3 3 4/4/2022 10:38:04 51 10:38:05 53 2 3 4/4/2022 10:39:04 52 10:39:05 55 3 3 4/4/2022 10:40:04 53 10:40:05 54 1 3 4/4/2022 10:41:04 52 10:41:05 62 10 3 4/4/2022 10:42:04 53 10:42:05 54 1 3 4/4/2022 10:43:04 55 10:43:05 56 1 3 4/4/2022 10:44:04 55 10:44:05 56 1 3 4/4/2022 10:45:04 57 10:45:05 58 1 3 4/4/2022 10:46:04 56 10:46:05 56 0 3 4/4/2022 10:47:04 58 10:47:05 56 -2 3 4/4/2022 10:48:04 57 10:48:05 54 -3 3 4/4/2022 10:49:04 56 10:49:05 54 -2 3 4/4/2022 10:50:04 53 10:50:05 54 1 3 4/4/2022 10:51:04 52 10:51:05 54 2 3 4/4/2022 10:52:04 53 10:52:05 60 7 3 4/4/2022 10:53:04 53 10:53:05 54 1 3 4/4/2022 10:54:04 53 10:54:05 53 0 3 4/4/2022 10:55:04 54 10:55:05 53 -1 3 4/4/2022 10:56:04 54 10:56:05 53 -1 3 4/4/2022 10:57:04 55 10:57:05 53 -2 3 4/4/2022 10:58:04 55 10:58:05 60 5 3 4/4/2022 10:59:04 55 10:59:05 59 4 3 4/4/2022 11:00:04 55 11:00:05 63 8 3 4/4/2022 11:01:04 55 11:01:05 56 1 3 4/4/2022 11:02:04 54 11:02:05 55 1 3 4/4/2022 11:03:04 53 11:03:05 56 3 3 4/4/2022 11:04:04 56 11:04:05 54 -2 3 4/4/2022 11:05:04 54 11:05:05 52 -2 3 4/4/2022 11:06:04 52 11:06:05 57 5 3 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 11:07:04 53 11:07:05 53 0 3 4/4/2022 11:08:04 53 11:08:05 53 0 3 4/4/2022 11:09:04 53 11:09:05 52 -1 3 4/4/2022 11:10:04 54 11:10:05 54 0 3 4/4/2022 11:11:04 54 11:11:05 54 0 3 4/4/2022 11:12:04 68 11:12:05 53 -15 3 4/4/2022 11:13:04 56 11:13:05 52 -4 3 4/4/2022 11:14:04 56 11:14:05 52 -4 3 4/4/2022 11:15:04 54 11:15:05 70 16 3 4/4/2022 11:16:04 54 11:16:05 56 2 3 4/4/2022 11:17:04 53 11:17:05 54 1 3 4/4/2022 11:18:04 54 11:18:05 55 1 3 4/4/2022 11:19:04 55 11:19:05 56 1 3 4/4/2022 11:20:04 56 11:20:05 54 -2 3 4/4/2022 11:21:04 55 11:21:05 56 1 3 4/4/2022 11:22:04 55 11:22:05 55 0 3 4/4/2022 11:23:04 54 11:23:05 55 1 3 4/4/2022 11:24:04 54 11:24:05 55 1 3 4/4/2022 11:25:04 55 11:25:05 54 -1 2 4/4/2022 11:26:04 54 11:26:05 54 0 2 4/4/2022 11:27:04 53 11:27:05 54 1 2 4/4/2022 11:28:04 53 11:28:05 55 2 2 4/4/2022 11:29:04 54 11:29:05 54 0 2 4/4/2022 11:30:04 54 11:30:05 54 0 2 4/4/2022 11:31:04 54 11:31:05 55 1 2 4/4/2022 11:32:04 55 11:32:05 54 -1 2 4/4/2022 11:33:04 55 11:33:05 55 0 2 4/4/2022 11:34:04 55 11:34:05 54 -1 2 4/4/2022 11:35:04 55 11:35:05 55 0 2 4/4/2022 11:36:04 55 11:36:05 54 -1 2 4/4/2022 11:37:04 53 11:37:05 56 3 2 4/4/2022 11:38:04 54 11:38:05 54 0 2 4/4/2022 11:39:04 54 11:39:05 54 0 2 4/4/2022 11:40:04 54 11:40:05 62 8 2 4/4/2022 11:41:04 52 11:41:05 57 5 2 4/4/2022 11:42:04 53 11:42:05 53 0 2 4/4/2022 11:43:04 53 11:43:05 52 -1 2 4/4/2022 11:44:04 52 11:44:05 53 1 2 4/4/2022 11:45:04 52 11:45:05 56 4 2 4/4/2022 11:46:04 51 11:46:05 52 1 2 4/4/2022 11:47:04 51 11:47:05 52 1 2 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 11:48:04 51 11:48:05 52 1 2 4/4/2022 11:49:04 53 11:49:05 53 0 2 4/4/2022 11:50:04 52 11:50:05 53 1 2 4/4/2022 11:51:04 53 11:51:05 52 -1 2 4/4/2022 11:52:04 58 11:52:05 53 -5 2 4/4/2022 11:53:04 54 11:53:05 52 -2 2 4/4/2022 11:54:04 52 11:54:05 52 0 2 4/4/2022 11:55:04 53 11:55:05 53 0 2 4/4/2022 11:56:04 53 11:56:05 52 -1 2 4/4/2022 11:57:04 52 11:57:05 52 0 2 4/4/2022 11:58:04 51 11:58:05 51 0 2 4/4/2022 11:59:04 52 11:59:05 51 -1 2 4/4/2022 12:00:04 53 12:00:05 55 2 2 4/4/2022 12:01:04 53 12:01:05 51 -2 2 4/4/2022 12:02:04 52 12:02:05 49 -3 2 4/4/2022 12:03:04 52 12:03:05 53 1 2 4/4/2022 12:04:04 52 12:04:05 53 1 2 4/4/2022 12:05:04 54 12:05:05 52 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:06:04 51 12:06:05 50 -1 1 4/4/2022 12:07:04 52 12:07:05 48 -4 1 4/4/2022 12:08:04 52 12:08:05 53 1 1 4/4/2022 12:09:04 52 12:09:05 61 9 1 4/4/2022 12:10:04 52 12:10:05 60 8 1 4/4/2022 12:11:04 51 12:11:05 51 0 1 4/4/2022 12:12:04 51 12:12:05 49 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:13:04 51 12:13:05 49 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:14:04 52 12:14:05 58 6 1 4/4/2022 12:15:04 52 12:15:05 50 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:16:04 51 12:16:05 49 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:17:04 50 12:17:05 47 -3 1 4/4/2022 12:18:04 50 12:18:05 48 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:19:04 52 12:19:05 48 -4 1 4/4/2022 12:20:04 52 12:20:05 53 1 1 4/4/2022 12:21:04 51 12:21:05 52 1 1 4/4/2022 12:22:04 52 12:22:05 51 -1 1 4/4/2022 12:23:04 53 12:23:05 51 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:24:04 52 12:24:05 50 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:25:04 52 12:25:05 50 -2 1 4/4/2022 12:26:04 53 12:26:05 50 -3 1 4/4/2022 12:27:04 52 12:27:05 55 3 1 4/4/2022 12:28:04 50 12:28:05 52 2 1 Table 2 PM10 Dust Monitoring Results 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Stantec Project No.: 18505355 Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Time PM10 Concentration (ug/m3) Upwind (Ambient Background) Date Downwind (Fugitive) Delta1 (ug/m3) 2-hour PM10 Rolling Average (ug/m3) 4/4/2022 12:29:04 51 12:29:05 50 -1 1 FIGURES ProjectLocation V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2021-10-04 By: dehernandez1 8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770 Property Location Map Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata. Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO,NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community Figure No. Title Project Location Client/ProjectBorstein Enterprises185805355 Property Boundary (At original document size of 8.5x11)1:24,000 ($$¯0 1,200 2,400Feet SUBJECT PROPERTY ProjectLocation V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2022-04-07 By: dehernandez2 Borstein Enterprises185805355Phase II Environmental Site Assessment SITE MAPCHLORDANE ANALYTICAL RESULTS Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata. Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: © 2022 Microsoft Corporation ©2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS Figure No. Title Project Location Client/Project (At original document size of 8.5x11)1:1,500 ($$¯0 75 150Feet 8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770 MISS I O N D R I V EWALNUT GROVE AVENUEHA-11 HA-15HA-13 HA-17 All concentrations reported in milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) Property Boundary SEE FIGURE 3 HA-11 Analyte detected above laboratory reporting limitsBOLD Analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limits< Assessor Parcel !.Soil Sample Locations Approximate Excavation Area V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2022-04-07 By: dehernandez3 Borstein Enterprises185805355Phase II Environmental Site Assessment SITE MAPREMEDIAL EXCAVATION Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata. Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: © 2022 Microsoft Corporation ©2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DSSources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap,INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, EsriChina (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS Figure No. Title Project Location Client/Project (At original document size of 8.5x11)1:500 ($$¯0 25 50Feet 8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770 All concentrations reported in milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) Property Boundary Analyte detected above laboratory reporting limitsBOLD Analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limits< !.Soil Sample Locations Approximate Excavation Area APPENDIX A SCAQMD RULE 1466 NOTIFICATION From:Robert Heller To:Viggiano, Brian Subject:1466 notification confirmation Date:Monday, March 28, 2022 12:47:37 PM From: Cathy Bartels <CBartels@aqmd.gov> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 9:15 AMTo: cgratz@bdcoinc.comCc: Rule1466 <rule1466@aqmd.gov>Subject: Rule 1466 Good Morning Mr. Miller, The following initial notification was processed today: Initial notification received (#5275), submitted 03/17/2022 your pending notification number is 692790. To finalize your initial notifications, submit a printout of this email along with the required notification fee of $68.07 per notification. For USPS/Post Office only, mail to: SCAQMD - Rule 1466 Notifications File # 55641 Los Angeles, CA 90074-5641 For all other carriers, ship to: Bank of America Lockbox ServicesLockbox # 556412706 Media Center DriveLos Angeles, CA 90065 Thank you, Cathy Bartels Office Assistant South Coast Air Quality Management District If you need to contact me immediately, please call me at the following number: Cell 714-322-3322 Office 909-949-0360 B&D Construction http://bdcoinc.com/ APPENDIX B FIELD AND DATA LOGS TrakPro Version 4.70 ASCII Data File Model:DustTrak DRX Model Number:8533 Serial Number:8533111905 Test ID:1 Test Abbreviation:UPWIND_001 Start Date:3/28/2022 Start Time:7:01:58 Duration (dd:hh:mm:ss):0:02:46:00 Log Interval (mm:ss):1:00 Number of points:166 Notes: Statistics Channel:PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 TOTAL Units:mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 Average:0.027 0.029 0.033 0.061 0.078 Minimum:0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 Time of Minimum:8:55:58 9:39:58 9:03:58 9:39:58 9:37:58 Date of Minimum:3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 Maximum:1.84 2 2.44 6.11 8.68 Time of Maximum:7:19:58 7:19:58 7:19:58 7:19:58 7:19:58 Date of Maximum:3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 Calibration Sensor:AEROSOL Cal. date 11/18/2021 Date Time PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 PM10 TOTAL MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 ug/m3 mg/m^3 3/28/2022 7:02:58 0.02 0.022 0.024 0.038 38 0.043 3/28/2022 7:03:58 0.081 0.088 0.106 0.249 249 0.29 3/28/2022 7:04:58 0.025 0.028 0.032 0.055 55 0.061 3/28/2022 7:05:58 0.019 0.02 0.022 0.027 27 0.028 3/28/2022 7:06:58 0.03 0.032 0.035 0.052 52 0.055 3/28/2022 7:07:58 0.026 0.028 0.031 0.045 45 0.049 3/28/2022 7:08:58 0.022 0.024 0.025 0.028 28 0.03 3/28/2022 7:09:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.021 21 0.021 3/28/2022 7:10:58 0.017 0.019 0.02 0.025 25 0.026 3/28/2022 7:11:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.022 22 0.023 3/28/2022 7:12:58 0.017 0.019 0.019 0.021 21 0.021 3/28/2022 7:13:58 0.049 0.055 0.066 0.116 116 0.125 3/28/2022 7:14:58 0.021 0.023 0.026 0.038 38 0.04 3/28/2022 7:15:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.021 21 0.022 3/28/2022 7:16:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.017 3/28/2022 7:17:58 0.031 0.034 0.04 0.068 68 0.076 3/28/2022 7:18:58 0.02 0.022 0.024 0.032 32 0.033 3/28/2022 7:19:58 1.84 2 2.44 6.11 6110 8.68 3/28/2022 7:20:58 0.058 0.07 0.084 0.123 123 0.136 3/28/2022 7:21:58 0.03 0.034 0.039 0.058 58 0.063 3/28/2022 7:22:58 0.019 0.021 0.024 0.033 33 0.035 3/28/2022 7:23:58 0.029 0.032 0.036 0.053 53 0.059 3/28/2022 7:24:58 0.033 0.035 0.039 0.063 63 0.069 3/28/2022 7:25:58 0.037 0.04 0.045 0.07 70 0.078 3/28/2022 7:26:58 0.022 0.024 0.026 0.03 30 0.031 3/28/2022 7:27:58 0.016 0.018 0.019 0.021 21 0.022 3/28/2022 7:28:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.021 3/28/2022 7:29:58 0.013 0.015 0.015 0.017 17 0.018 3/28/2022 7:30:58 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.016 16 0.017 3/28/2022 7:31:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.025 25 0.027 3/28/2022 7:32:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.023 23 0.023 3/28/2022 7:33:58 0.037 0.04 0.047 0.074 74 0.083 3/28/2022 7:34:58 0.051 0.057 0.069 0.127 127 0.141 3/28/2022 7:35:58 0.018 0.02 0.021 0.027 27 0.03 3/28/2022 7:36:58 0.015 0.017 0.017 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 7:37:58 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.021 3/28/2022 7:38:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.021 21 0.021 3/28/2022 7:39:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.02 20 0.02 3/28/2022 7:40:58 0.022 0.023 0.024 0.026 26 0.027 3/28/2022 7:41:58 0.017 0.019 0.02 0.023 23 0.024 3/28/2022 7:42:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.02 20 0.02 3/28/2022 7:43:58 0.022 0.024 0.026 0.031 31 0.033 3/28/2022 7:44:58 0.027 0.029 0.032 0.047 47 0.051 3/28/2022 7:45:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.021 21 0.022 3/28/2022 7:46:58 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.02 20 0.02 3/28/2022 7:47:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 7:48:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.021 21 0.022 3/28/2022 7:49:58 0.016 0.017 0.017 0.018 18 0.018 3/28/2022 7:50:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.017 17 0.018 3/28/2022 7:51:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.016 3/28/2022 7:52:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.023 23 0.023 3/28/2022 7:53:58 0.015 0.017 0.017 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 7:54:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.024 24 0.025 3/28/2022 7:55:58 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.021 21 0.022 3/28/2022 7:56:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.022 22 0.022 3/28/2022 7:57:58 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.016 16 0.016 3/28/2022 7:58:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.021 3/28/2022 7:59:58 0.014 0.015 0.017 0.02 20 0.021 3/28/2022 8:00:58 0.02 0.021 0.023 0.031 31 0.032 3/28/2022 8:01:58 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.017 17 0.018 3/28/2022 8:02:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.021 3/28/2022 8:03:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.018 18 0.018 3/28/2022 8:04:58 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.017 17 0.017 3/28/2022 8:05:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 8:06:58 0.016 0.018 0.018 0.022 22 0.023 3/28/2022 8:07:58 0.02 0.022 0.024 0.033 33 0.036 3/28/2022 8:08:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.023 23 0.026 3/28/2022 8:09:58 0.019 0.021 0.024 0.034 34 0.037 3/28/2022 8:10:58 0.017 0.019 0.021 0.027 27 0.028 3/28/2022 8:11:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.02 3/28/2022 8:12:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.018 18 0.02 3/28/2022 8:13:58 0.021 0.024 0.027 0.042 42 0.043 3/28/2022 8:14:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.018 3/28/2022 8:15:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 8:16:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.021 21 0.022 3/28/2022 8:17:58 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.017 17 0.017 3/28/2022 8:18:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.019 19 0.021 3/28/2022 8:19:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 17 0.018 3/28/2022 8:20:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 17 0.018 3/28/2022 8:21:58 0.016 0.018 0.018 0.022 22 0.022 3/28/2022 8:22:58 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.015 3/28/2022 8:23:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 8:24:58 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.022 22 0.022 3/28/2022 8:25:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.018 18 0.019 3/28/2022 8:26:58 0.015 0.016 0.018 0.026 26 0.028 3/28/2022 8:27:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.019 3/28/2022 8:28:58 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.025 25 0.026 3/28/2022 8:29:58 0.025 0.027 0.03 0.042 42 0.043 3/28/2022 8:30:58 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.026 26 0.028 3/28/2022 8:31:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 19 0.02 3/28/2022 8:32:58 0.016 0.017 0.017 0.019 19 0.02 3/28/2022 8:33:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 8:34:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.016 3/28/2022 8:35:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.021 21 0.021 3/28/2022 8:36:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.018 18 0.018 3/28/2022 8:37:58 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.017 17 0.018 3/28/2022 8:38:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.019 3/28/2022 8:39:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 17 0.017 3/28/2022 8:40:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.018 18 0.018 3/28/2022 8:41:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.018 18 0.019 3/28/2022 8:42:58 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.012 12 0.013 3/28/2022 8:43:58 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:44:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.02 20 0.02 3/28/2022 8:45:58 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.016 16 0.017 3/28/2022 8:46:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 8:47:58 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 8:48:58 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.015 15 0.016 3/28/2022 8:49:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.02 3/28/2022 8:50:58 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.023 23 0.024 3/28/2022 8:51:58 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.014 14 0.015 3/28/2022 8:52:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 8:53:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.016 16 0.017 3/28/2022 8:54:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.012 12 0.014 3/28/2022 8:55:58 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:56:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.019 3/28/2022 8:57:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.019 3/28/2022 8:58:58 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.012 3/28/2022 8:59:58 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.012 12 0.013 3/28/2022 9:00:58 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 9:01:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.016 3/28/2022 9:02:58 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 9:03:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 9:04:58 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.016 3/28/2022 9:05:58 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 9:06:58 0.012 0.013 0.015 0.024 24 0.025 3/28/2022 9:07:58 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.016 16 0.017 3/28/2022 9:08:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.022 22 0.024 3/28/2022 9:09:58 0.02 0.022 0.023 0.026 26 0.026 3/28/2022 9:10:58 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.016 3/28/2022 9:11:58 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 9:12:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 9:13:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.012 3/28/2022 9:14:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 9:15:58 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 9:16:58 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 9:17:58 0.017 0.018 0.018 0.02 20 0.021 3/28/2022 9:18:58 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.016 16 0.016 3/28/2022 9:19:58 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.017 17 0.017 3/28/2022 9:20:58 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.016 16 0.016 3/28/2022 9:21:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 9:22:58 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.012 12 0.013 3/28/2022 9:23:58 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.013 13 0.014 3/28/2022 9:24:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 9:25:58 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 9:26:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.009 3/28/2022 9:27:58 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 9:28:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 9:29:58 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 9:30:58 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 9:31:58 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.014 14 0.015 3/28/2022 9:32:58 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 9:33:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 9:34:58 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 9:35:58 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 9:36:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.017 17 0.018 3/28/2022 9:37:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 9:38:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.009 3/28/2022 9:39:58 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 7 0.008 3/28/2022 9:40:58 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 9:41:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 9:42:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.009 3/28/2022 9:43:58 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 9:44:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 9:45:58 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 9:46:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.019 19 0.019 3/28/2022 9:47:58 0.01 0.011 0.013 0.02 20 0.021 Model:DustTrak DRX Model Number:8533 Serial Number:8533111905 Test ID:2 Test Abbreviation:UPWIND_002 Start Date:4/4/2022 Start Time:7:00:04 Duration (dd:hh:mm:ss):0:05:29:00 Log Interval (mm:ss):1:00 Number of points:329 Notes: Statistics Channel:PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 TOTAL Units:mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 Average:0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.057 Minimum:0.048 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.05 Time of Minimum:12:18:04 12:18:04 10:36:04 12:17:04 12:17:04 Date of Minimum:4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 Maximum:0.065 0.067 0.068 0.074 0.075 Time of Maximum:7:01:04 7:01:04 7:01:04 8:17:04 8:17:04 Date of Maximum:4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 Calibration Sensor:AEROSOL Cal. date 11/18/2021 Date Time PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 PM10 TOTAL MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 ug/m3 mg/m^3 4/4/2022 7:01:04 0.065 0.067 0.068 0.071 71 0.071 4/4/2022 7:02:04 0.064 0.066 0.067 0.068 68 0.068 4/4/2022 7:03:04 0.064 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 7:04:04 0.064 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 7:05:04 0.063 0.065 0.065 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 7:06:04 0.061 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:07:04 0.06 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:08:04 0.06 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:09:04 0.059 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:10:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:11:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:12:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:13:04 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.065 4/4/2022 7:14:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 7:15:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:16:04 0.06 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:17:04 0.06 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:18:04 0.06 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:19:04 0.06 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:20:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:21:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:22:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:23:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:24:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:25:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:26:04 0.057 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 7:27:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 7:28:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.059 4/4/2022 7:29:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 7:30:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 7:31:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 7:32:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 7:33:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 7:34:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 7:35:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 7:36:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 7:37:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:38:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:39:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:40:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:41:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:42:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:43:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:44:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:45:04 0.06 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:46:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:47:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:48:04 0.059 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:49:04 0.06 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:50:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:51:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:52:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 7:53:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.061 4/4/2022 7:54:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:55:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:56:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 7:57:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 7:58:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 7:59:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:00:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:01:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:02:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:03:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:04:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:05:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:06:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:07:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:08:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:09:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 8:10:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 8:11:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 8:12:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:13:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 8:14:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 8:15:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 8:16:04 0.059 0.061 0.063 0.068 68 0.069 4/4/2022 8:17:04 0.061 0.064 0.067 0.074 74 0.075 4/4/2022 8:18:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:19:04 0.058 0.06 0.061 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 8:20:04 0.057 0.059 0.06 0.062 62 0.063 4/4/2022 8:21:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:22:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:23:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:24:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 8:25:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 8:26:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:27:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:28:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:29:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:30:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:31:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:32:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:33:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:34:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:35:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:36:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:37:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:38:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:39:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:40:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:41:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:42:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:43:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:44:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:45:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:46:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:47:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 8:48:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:49:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:50:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:51:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:52:04 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:53:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:54:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 8:55:04 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 8:56:04 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 8:57:04 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 8:58:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 8:59:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:00:04 0.061 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:01:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:02:04 0.061 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:03:04 0.06 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:04:04 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:05:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.062 4/4/2022 9:06:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.062 4/4/2022 9:07:04 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:08:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:09:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:10:04 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:11:04 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:12:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:13:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:14:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:15:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:16:04 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:17:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:18:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:19:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:20:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:21:04 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:22:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:23:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:24:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:25:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:26:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.061 4/4/2022 9:27:04 0.059 0.061 0.062 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:28:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:29:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:30:04 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:31:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:32:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:33:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:34:04 0.057 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:35:04 0.057 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 9:36:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:37:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 9:38:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 9:39:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 9:40:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 9:41:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:42:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:43:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:44:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:45:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.06 4/4/2022 9:46:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 9:47:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:48:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.059 4/4/2022 9:49:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 9:50:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 9:51:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:52:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 9:53:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 9:54:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:55:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:56:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 9:57:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.059 4/4/2022 9:58:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 9:59:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:00:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:01:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:02:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:03:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:04:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 10:05:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:06:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:07:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:08:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:09:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:10:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:11:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:12:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:13:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:14:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:15:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:16:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:17:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:18:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:19:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:20:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:21:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:22:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:23:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:24:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.056 4/4/2022 10:25:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.056 4/4/2022 10:26:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:27:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:28:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:29:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:30:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:31:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:32:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:33:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:34:04 0.049 0.05 0.051 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 10:35:04 0.049 0.05 0.051 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 10:36:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 10:37:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 10:38:04 0.05 0.05 0.051 0.051 51 0.052 4/4/2022 10:39:04 0.05 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 10:40:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:41:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 10:42:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:43:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:44:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.056 4/4/2022 10:45:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.057 57 0.058 4/4/2022 10:46:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:47:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.058 58 0.059 4/4/2022 10:48:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:49:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.056 56 0.057 4/4/2022 10:50:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:51:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 10:52:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:53:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:54:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:55:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.055 4/4/2022 10:56:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:57:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:58:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:59:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.056 4/4/2022 11:00:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:01:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:02:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:03:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:04:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.056 56 0.057 4/4/2022 11:05:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:06:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.053 4/4/2022 11:07:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:08:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:09:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.053 53 0.054 4/4/2022 11:10:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:11:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:12:04 0.056 0.057 0.059 0.068 68 0.07 4/4/2022 11:13:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.056 56 0.057 4/4/2022 11:14:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:15:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:16:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:17:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:18:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:19:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:20:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:21:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:22:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:23:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:24:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:25:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:26:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:27:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:28:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:29:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:30:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:31:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:32:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:33:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:34:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:35:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:36:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:37:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:38:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:39:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:40:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:41:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:42:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:43:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:44:04 0.05 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:45:04 0.049 0.05 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:46:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.052 4/4/2022 11:47:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 11:48:04 0.05 0.05 0.051 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 11:49:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:50:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:51:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:52:04 0.052 0.054 0.054 0.058 58 0.059 4/4/2022 11:53:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:54:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:55:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:56:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:57:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:58:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.052 4/4/2022 11:59:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:00:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 12:01:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 12:02:04 0.05 0.05 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:03:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:04:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:05:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.054 54 0.055 4/4/2022 12:06:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.052 4/4/2022 12:07:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:08:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:09:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:10:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:11:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:12:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:13:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:14:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:15:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:16:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:17:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 0.05 4/4/2022 12:18:04 0.048 0.049 0.05 0.05 50 0.05 4/4/2022 12:19:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:20:04 0.049 0.05 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:21:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.052 4/4/2022 12:22:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:23:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 12:24:04 0.05 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:25:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:26:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 12:27:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:28:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 0.051 4/4/2022 12:29:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 TrakPro Version 4.70 ASCII Data File Model:DustTrak DRX Model Number:8533 Serial Number:8533142804 Test ID:1 Test Abbreviation:DOWNWIND_001 Start Date:3/28/2022 Start Time:7:02:22 Duration (dd:hh:mm:ss):0:02:44:00 Log Interval (mm:ss):1:00 Number of points:164 Notes: Statistics Channel:PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 TOTAL Units:mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 Average:0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.01 Minimum:0.004 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 Time of Minimum:9:01:22 9:02:22 9:16:22 8:59:22 9:00:22 Date of Minimum:3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 Maximum:0.035 0.036 0.04 0.074 0.087 Time of Maximum:7:03:22 7:03:22 7:03:22 7:03:22 7:03:22 Date of Maximum:3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 Calibration Sensor:AEROSOL Cal. date 4/28/2021 Date Time PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 PM10 TOTAL MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 ug/m^3 mg/m^3 3/28/2022 7:03:22 0.035 0.036 0.04 0.074 74 0.087 3/28/2022 7:04:22 0.023 0.024 0.027 0.039 39 0.042 3/28/2022 7:05:22 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.016 3/28/2022 7:06:22 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 7:07:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 7:08:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 7:09:22 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 7:10:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 7:11:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 7:12:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015 3/28/2022 7:13:22 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:14:22 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:15:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:16:22 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:17:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:18:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:19:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:20:22 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.015 3/28/2022 7:21:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:22:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:23:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:24:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:25:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:26:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:27:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:28:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.014 14 0.014 3/28/2022 7:29:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:30:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:31:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:32:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:33:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:34:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.013 3/28/2022 7:35:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:36:22 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:37:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:38:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:39:22 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 7:40:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:41:22 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:42:22 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:43:22 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:44:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.013 3/28/2022 7:45:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.013 13 0.013 3/28/2022 7:46:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:47:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:48:22 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:49:22 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:50:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.012 3/28/2022 7:51:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:52:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:53:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:54:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:55:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:56:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:57:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 7:58:22 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 7:59:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 8:00:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:01:22 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 8:02:22 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011 3/28/2022 8:03:22 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:04:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:05:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:06:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:07:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:08:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:09:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:10:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:11:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:12:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:13:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:14:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:15:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:16:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:17:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:18:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:19:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.011 3/28/2022 8:20:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:21:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:22:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:23:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:24:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:25:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:26:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:27:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:28:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:29:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:30:22 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:31:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:32:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:33:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:34:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:35:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:36:22 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:37:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01 3/28/2022 8:38:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:39:22 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:40:22 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 9 0.009 3/28/2022 8:41:22 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:42:22 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:43:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:44:22 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 8 0.009 3/28/2022 8:45:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 7 0.007 3/28/2022 8:46:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:47:22 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:48:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:49:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:50:22 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.007 7 0.007 3/28/2022 8:51:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:52:22 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:53:22 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008 3/28/2022 8:54:22 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 7 0.008 3/28/2022 8:55:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 8:56:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 8:57:22 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 7 0.007 3/28/2022 8:58:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 8:59:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006 3/28/2022 9:00:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:01:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:02:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:03:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:04:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:05:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:06:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:07:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:08:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:09:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:10:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006 3/28/2022 9:11:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:12:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:13:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006 3/28/2022 9:14:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:15:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:16:22 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:17:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:18:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.007 3/28/2022 9:19:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:20:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:21:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006 3/28/2022 9:22:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:23:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:24:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:25:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:26:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:27:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:28:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:29:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:30:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:31:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:32:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:33:22 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:34:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:35:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006 3/28/2022 9:36:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:37:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:38:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:39:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:40:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:41:22 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:42:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:43:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:44:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 3/28/2022 9:45:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005 3/28/2022 9:46:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006 Model:DustTrak DRX Model Number:8533 Serial Number:8533142804 Test ID:2 Test Abbreviation:DOWNWIND_002 Start Date:4/4/2022 Start Time:7:00:05 Duration (dd:hh:mm:ss):0:05:31:00 Log Interval (mm:ss):1:00 Number of points:331 Notes: Statistics Channel:PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 TOTAL Units:mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 Average:0.058 0.058 0.058 0.06 0.06 Minimum:0.046 0.046 0.047 0.047 0.047 Time of Minimum:12:17:05 12:17:05 12:17:05 12:17:05 12:17:05 Date of Minimum:4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 Maximum:0.078 0.079 0.08 0.091 0.092 Time of Maximum:7:01:05 7:01:05 7:01:05 7:03:05 7:03:05 Date of Maximum:4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 Calibration Sensor:AEROSOL Cal. date 4/28/2021 Date Time PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 PM10 TOTAL MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 ug/m3 mg/m^3 4/4/2022 7:01:05 0.078 0.079 0.08 0.081 81 0.084 4/4/2022 7:02:05 0.072 0.073 0.074 0.077 77 0.078 4/4/2022 7:03:05 0.076 0.077 0.08 0.091 91 0.092 4/4/2022 7:04:05 0.069 0.07 0.07 0.072 72 0.072 4/4/2022 7:05:05 0.068 0.069 0.07 0.071 71 0.071 4/4/2022 7:06:05 0.066 0.067 0.067 0.068 68 0.068 4/4/2022 7:07:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 7:08:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 7:09:05 0.064 0.065 0.065 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 7:10:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 7:11:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:12:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:13:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:14:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:15:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.062 4/4/2022 7:16:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:17:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:18:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:19:05 0.067 0.068 0.068 0.069 69 0.069 4/4/2022 7:20:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:21:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:22:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:23:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:24:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:25:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:26:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:27:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:28:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 7:29:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 7:30:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:31:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:32:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 7:33:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 7:34:05 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:35:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:36:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:37:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:38:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 7:39:05 0.065 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 7:40:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 7:41:05 0.065 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 7:42:05 0.064 0.065 0.065 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 7:43:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 7:44:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 7:45:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:46:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:47:05 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:48:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 7:49:05 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:50:05 0.064 0.065 0.066 0.068 68 0.069 4/4/2022 7:51:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.067 67 0.068 4/4/2022 7:52:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:53:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:54:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:55:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 7:56:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 7:57:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 7:58:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 7:59:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.063 63 0.064 4/4/2022 8:00:05 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 8:01:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 8:02:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 8:03:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 8:04:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 8:05:05 0.066 0.067 0.068 0.069 69 0.069 4/4/2022 8:06:05 0.063 0.064 0.065 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 8:07:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 8:08:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:09:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:10:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:11:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 8:12:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:13:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:14:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:15:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:16:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:17:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:18:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:19:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:20:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:21:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:22:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:23:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:24:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.062 62 0.063 4/4/2022 8:25:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:26:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 8:27:05 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 8:28:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:29:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 8:30:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.061 4/4/2022 8:31:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:32:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:33:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:34:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:35:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:36:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:37:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:38:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:39:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:40:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:41:05 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:42:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:43:05 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:44:05 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.059 4/4/2022 8:45:05 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:46:05 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 8:47:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.06 4/4/2022 8:48:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:49:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 8:50:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:51:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 8:52:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 8:53:05 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 8:54:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 8:55:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 8:56:05 0.066 0.067 0.067 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 8:57:05 0.066 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 8:58:05 0.066 0.066 0.067 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 8:59:05 0.067 0.067 0.067 0.068 68 0.068 4/4/2022 9:00:05 0.066 0.067 0.067 0.068 68 0.068 4/4/2022 9:01:05 0.066 0.066 0.067 0.069 69 0.069 4/4/2022 9:02:05 0.065 0.065 0.065 0.066 66 0.067 4/4/2022 9:03:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 9:04:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:05:05 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:06:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:07:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.065 65 0.066 4/4/2022 9:08:05 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:09:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:10:05 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:11:05 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:12:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:13:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:14:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:15:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:16:05 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:17:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:18:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.066 66 0.066 4/4/2022 9:19:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:20:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:21:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:22:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:23:05 0.063 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:24:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:25:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:26:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:27:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:28:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.065 4/4/2022 9:29:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.065 4/4/2022 9:30:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:31:05 0.064 0.065 0.065 0.067 67 0.067 4/4/2022 9:32:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065 4/4/2022 9:33:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.065 65 0.066 4/4/2022 9:34:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:35:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:36:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:37:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:38:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:39:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:40:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064 4/4/2022 9:41:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063 4/4/2022 9:42:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:43:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:44:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.063 4/4/2022 9:45:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:46:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:47:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.063 4/4/2022 9:48:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:49:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:50:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:51:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:52:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 9:53:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 9:54:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:55:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:56:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:57:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:58:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 9:59:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.06 4/4/2022 10:00:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:01:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:02:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 10:03:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 10:04:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:05:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 10:06:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:07:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:08:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:09:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 10:10:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:11:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:12:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:13:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:14:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.06 4/4/2022 10:15:05 0.057 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:16:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:17:05 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:18:05 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.06 60 0.06 4/4/2022 10:19:05 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.061 61 0.061 4/4/2022 10:20:05 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 10:21:05 0.057 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:22:05 0.057 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 10:23:05 0.057 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.059 4/4/2022 10:24:05 0.057 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.06 4/4/2022 10:25:05 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:26:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:27:05 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:28:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:29:05 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:30:05 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.06 60 0.061 4/4/2022 10:31:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 10:32:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:33:05 0.062 0.063 0.065 0.081 81 0.084 4/4/2022 10:34:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.062 62 0.063 4/4/2022 10:35:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:36:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:37:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:38:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:39:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 10:40:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:41:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.062 62 0.062 4/4/2022 10:42:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:43:05 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:44:05 0.055 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:45:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.058 58 0.058 4/4/2022 10:46:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:47:05 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 10:48:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.055 4/4/2022 10:49:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:50:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.055 4/4/2022 10:51:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:52:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.06 60 0.061 4/4/2022 10:53:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 10:54:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:55:05 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:56:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:57:05 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 10:58:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.06 60 0.061 4/4/2022 10:59:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.059 59 0.06 4/4/2022 11:00:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.063 63 0.064 4/4/2022 11:01:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:02:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.056 4/4/2022 11:03:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:04:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:05:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:06:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 11:07:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:08:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:09:05 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:10:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:11:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:12:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:13:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:14:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:15:05 0.059 0.06 0.062 0.07 70 0.07 4/4/2022 11:16:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:17:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:18:05 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.056 4/4/2022 11:19:05 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:20:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:21:05 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:22:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:23:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:24:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:25:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.055 4/4/2022 11:26:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:27:05 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:28:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:29:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:30:05 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:31:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:32:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:33:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:34:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:35:05 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 11:36:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:37:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:38:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:39:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.054 54 0.054 4/4/2022 11:40:05 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.062 62 0.064 4/4/2022 11:41:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.057 57 0.057 4/4/2022 11:42:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:43:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.053 4/4/2022 11:44:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:45:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.056 56 0.056 4/4/2022 11:46:05 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.053 4/4/2022 11:47:05 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:48:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:49:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:50:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:51:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:52:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:53:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:54:05 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:55:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 11:56:05 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:57:05 0.05 0.05 0.051 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 11:58:05 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 11:59:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:00:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 12:01:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:02:05 0.047 0.048 0.048 0.049 49 0.049 4/4/2022 12:03:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 12:04:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.053 53 0.054 4/4/2022 12:05:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:06:05 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.05 50 0.05 4/4/2022 12:07:05 0.047 0.047 0.048 0.048 48 0.049 4/4/2022 12:08:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 12:09:05 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.061 61 0.062 4/4/2022 12:10:05 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.06 60 0.061 4/4/2022 12:11:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:12:05 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 49 0.049 4/4/2022 12:13:05 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.049 49 0.049 4/4/2022 12:14:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.058 58 0.06 4/4/2022 12:15:05 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.05 50 0.05 4/4/2022 12:16:05 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 49 0.049 4/4/2022 12:17:05 0.046 0.046 0.047 0.047 47 0.047 4/4/2022 12:18:05 0.046 0.047 0.047 0.048 48 0.048 4/4/2022 12:19:05 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.048 48 0.048 4/4/2022 12:20:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.053 53 0.053 4/4/2022 12:21:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:22:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:23:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.051 51 0.051 4/4/2022 12:24:05 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.05 50 0.05 4/4/2022 12:25:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.05 50 0.051 4/4/2022 12:26:05 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.05 50 0.05 4/4/2022 12:27:05 0.05 0.051 0.052 0.055 55 0.055 4/4/2022 12:28:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.052 52 0.052 4/4/2022 12:29:05 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.05 50 0.05 4/4/2022 12:30:05 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.05 50 0.05 4/4/2022 12:31:05 0.053 0.053 0.055 0.063 63 0.065 APPENDIX C WASTE DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION Date Manifest/Additional Documents Ticket #Material Facility Carrier Material Quantity Material Unit 4/4/2022 652136CA 220781 1236561 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 24.89 24.89 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220778 1236563 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.76 25.76 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220779 1236568 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.58 25.58 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220777 1236572 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 27.51 27.51 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220780 1236576 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 26.86 26.86 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220752 1236626 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.49 25.49 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220753 1236629 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 24.83 24.83 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220754 1236630 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.69 25.69 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220755 1236638 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 28.15 28.15 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220756 1236658 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 26.07 26.07 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220757 1236713 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 26.54 26.54 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220759 1236731 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.64 25.64 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220758 1236734 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.94 25.94 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220760 1236744 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 28.08 28.08 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220761 1236754 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 26.41 26.41 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220762 1236781 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.1 25.1 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220763 1236788 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.78 25.78 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220764 1236797 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 24.91 24.91 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220765 1236801 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 24.67 24.67 TON 4/4/2022 652136CA 220766 1236817 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 22.42 22.42 TON 516.32 516.32 TON Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236561 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier ARRIAGAS TRANSPORT Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 177 Volume 12.0 Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G18207 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220781 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 80400 lb In 04/04/2022 08:15:10 1 jarebalo Tare 30620 lb* Out 04/04/2022 08:16:03 1 jarebalo Net 49780 lb * Manual Weight Tons 24.89 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 24.89 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236563 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier RICHARD PANIAGUA Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 203 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F94906 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220778 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 83320 lb In 04/04/2022 08:17:45 2 jholstad Tare 31800 lb Out 04/04/2022 08:17:45 jholstad Net 51520 lb Tons 25.76 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.76 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236568 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier DA TRUCKING INC Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 1 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F89944 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220779 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82000 lb In 04/04/2022 08:21:52 Scale 3 rlegazpi Tare 30840 lb Out 04/04/2022 08:21:52 rlegazpi Net 51160 lb Tons 25.58 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.58 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236572 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier MT TRANSPORT Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 001 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G06555 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220777 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 84200 lb In 04/04/2022 08:29:06 2 jholstad Tare 29180 lb Out 04/04/2022 08:29:06 jholstad Net 55020 lb Tons 27.51 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 27.51 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236576 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier VIGLER Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 02 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: YP05078 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220780 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 85340 lb In 04/04/2022 08:32:20 2 jholstad Tare 31620 lb Out 04/04/2022 08:53:10 Scale 3 rlegazpi Net 53720 lb Tons 26.86 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 26.86 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236626 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier RICHARD PANIAGUA Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 203 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F94906 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220752 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82780 lb In 04/04/2022 09:43:39 2 JAREBALO Tare 31800 lb Out 04/04/2022 09:43:39 JAREBALO Net 50980 lb Tons 25.49 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.49 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236629 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier ARRIAGAS TRANSPORT Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 177 Volume 12.0 Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G18207 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220753 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 80280 lb In 04/04/2022 09:47:28 2 JAREBALO Tare 30620 lb Out 04/04/2022 09:47:28 JAREBALO Net 49660 lb Tons 24.83 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 24.83 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236630 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier DA TRUCKING INC Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 1 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F89944 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220754 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82220 lb In 04/04/2022 09:49:56 1 jarebalo Tare 30840 lb Out 04/04/2022 09:49:56 jarebalo Net 51380 lb Tons 25.69 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.69 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236638 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier MT TRANSPORT Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 001 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G06555 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220755 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 85480 lb In 04/04/2022 09:57:49 2 JAREBALO Tare 29180 lb Out 04/04/2022 09:57:49 JAREBALO Net 56300 lb Tons 28.15 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 28.15 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236658 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier VIGLER Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 02 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: YP05078 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220756 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 83760 lb In 04/04/2022 10:16:34 1 jarebalo Tare 31620 lb Out 04/04/2022 10:16:34 jarebalo Net 52140 lb Tons 26.07 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 26.07 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236713 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier RICHARD PANIAGUA Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 203 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F94906 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220757 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 84880 lb In 04/04/2022 11:07:29 Scale 3 rlegazpi Tare 31800 lb Out 04/04/2022 11:07:29 rlegazpi Net 53080 lb Tons 26.54 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 26.54 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236731 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier DA TRUCKING INC Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 1 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F89944 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220759 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82120 lb In 04/04/2022 11:18:02 Scale 3 rlegazpi Tare 30840 lb Out 04/04/2022 11:18:02 rlegazpi Net 51280 lb Tons 25.64 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.64 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236734 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier ARRIAGAS TRANSPORT Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 177 Volume 12.0 Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G18207 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220758 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82500 lb In 04/04/2022 11:20:31 1 JAREBALO Tare 30620 lb Out 04/04/2022 11:20:31 JAREBALO Net 51880 lb Tons 25.94 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.94 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236744 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier MT TRANSPORT Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 001 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G06555 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220760 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 85340 lb In 04/04/2022 11:28:05 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 29180 lb Out 04/04/2022 11:28:05 JHOLSTAD Net 56160 lb Tons 28.08 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 28.08 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236754 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier VIGLER Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 02 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: YP05078 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220761 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 84440 lb In 04/04/2022 11:36:26 Scale 3 rlegazpi Tare 31620 lb Out 04/04/2022 11:36:26 rlegazpi Net 52820 lb Tons 26.41 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 26.41 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236781 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier RICHARD PANIAGUA Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 203 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F94906 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220762 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82000 lb In 04/04/2022 12:25:23 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 31800 lb Out 04/04/2022 12:25:23 JHOLSTAD Net 50200 lb Tons 25.10 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.10 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236788 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier DA TRUCKING INC Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 1 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F89944 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220763 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82400 lb In 04/04/2022 12:38:12 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 30840 lb Out 04/04/2022 12:38:12 JHOLSTAD Net 51560 lb Tons 25.78 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.78 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236797 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier ARRIAGAS TRANSPORT Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 177 Volume 12.0 Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G18207 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220764 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 80440 lb In 04/04/2022 12:48:46 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 30620 lb Out 04/04/2022 12:48:46 JHOLSTAD Net 49820 lb Tons 24.91 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 24.91 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236801 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier MT TRANSPORT Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 001 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G06555 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220765 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 78520 lb In 04/04/2022 12:57:05 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 29180 lb Out 04/04/2022 12:57:05 JHOLSTAD Net 49340 lb Tons 24.67 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 24.67 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint 1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236817 Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127 Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier VIGLER Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 02 Volume Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: YP05078 Manual Ticket# Container Hauling Ticket# Check# Manifest 0220766 Billing# 0001782 Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951 Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 76460 lb In 04/04/2022 13:12:56 Scale 3 RLEGAZPI Tare 31620 lb Out 04/04/2022 13:12:56 RLEGAZPI Net 44840 lb Tons 22.42 Comments Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 22.42 Tons Rosemead 2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead Total Tax Total Ticket Driver`s Signature 1 PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 83705 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Project Address: 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California 91770 Prepared For: Mission Villas, LLC. Attn: Mitch Gardner 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310) 582-1991 Prepared By: C&V Consulting Inc. 9830 Irvine Center Dr. Irvine, CA 92618 Ryan Bittner, P.E. Contact: Marco Midence Project Manager (949) 916-3800 Prepared: February 2022 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION: 4 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY: 4 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS: 4 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: 4 5.0 METHODOLOGY: 5 6.0 RESULTS: 6 7.0 CONCLUSIONS: 7 8.0 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: 7 9.0 REFERENCES: 7 APPENDIX A: Hydrology Maps Existing Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map Proposed Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map APPENDIX B: Hydrology Calculations Existing Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25-year, 50-year, & 100-year Storm Events) Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25-year, 50-year, & 100-year Storm Events) Off-site Hydrology Calculations (25-year, 50-year, & 100-year Storm Events) APPENDIX C: Isohyet Map APPENDIX D: Hydraulic Calculations APPENDIX E: As-Builts & References 3 Preliminary Hydrology Study for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83705 Mission Villas Rosemead ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE PAGE This Preliminary Hydrology Study was prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc. under the supervision of Ryan J. Bittner, P.E. ___________________________________ ____________ Ryan J. Bittner, R.C.E. 68167 Date Principal, C&V Consulting, Inc. 4 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION: The proposed development encompasses three (3) parcels consisting of approximately 3.44 gross acres and 3.38 net acres. The site is bounded by existing residential lots to the north and the east, Mission Drive to the south, and power lines owned by Southern California Edison to the west. 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY: The preliminary hydrology study will determine the amount of stormwater runoff generated from the project site in the existing and proposed conditions. This study will anticipate whether detention or other peak flow mitigation methods will be required by comparing the proposed and existing condition peak flow rates for the 25, 50 and 100-year storm events. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS: All three parcels are currently a vacant lot. Besides two small service roads in southern and eastern portions of the site the site is all pervious coverage. The site is surrounded by alternating masonry block wall, wooden fence, and chain link fence around the entire property. There is existing public sidewalk and driveway entrances along Mission Drive. There are no existing storm drain facilities located on the site and no storm drain facilities located in the adjacent portion of Mission Drive along the project frontage. The existing drainage pattern of the site consists of one drainage area labeled XA1 on the Pre-Existing condition hydrology map located in Appendix A. The entire site sheet flows over the vacant land in a southerly direction. Stormwater appears to simply sheet flow over existing driveway entrances and enters Mission Road. Once stormwater enters Mission Rd. it flows in a southeasterly direction and enters a Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) owned catch basin approximately 500’ downstream of our site. This catch basin is connected to a LACFCD 30” RCP (LACFCD Project RDD 250) which flows into the Eaton Wash channel then into the Rio Hondo Channel. The Rio Hondo Channel then connects to the Los Angeles River then ultimately the Pacific Ocean. The existing area was determined to be 98.5% pervious based on the ALTA/Topographic Survey prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc. dated October 2021. Since all the existing onsite stormwater runoff ultimately reaches one location, the existing site was analyzed as one drainage area (XA1) to approximately quantify the runoff based on the longest hydraulic path from the most remote high point to low point. Refer to the “Existing Conditions Hydrology Map” located within Appendix A of this study for more information. 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: The proposed project consists of 8 duplex units and 29 single family homes over approximately 3.38 acres. The proposed development includes drive aisles, parking, landscaping, walkways, patios, and common open space areas. The site will be graded to collect runoff at one low point to control the amount of imported fill during grading and maintaining the existing site drainage pattern. The proposed development will utilize onsite catch basins, infiltration systems, and a detention pipe system to capture and treat stormwater. Stormwater up to the design capture volume will be infiltrated by a proposed onsite drywell system. 5 Stormwater runoff will be conveyed via proposed onsite gutter and directed to one sump area equipped with a curb inlet catch basin. There will be two additional catch basins located along the site’s main spine in flow by conditions to convey stormwater into the underground storm drain system. The sump catch basin will be located at the end of the drive aisle at the southern property line. All on-site catch basins will be connected by storm drain pipe to the drywell infiltration system for water quality treatment. During larger storm events, stormwater runoff will back up the drywell system which is connected to the underground detention system. Larger storm events will bypass the infiltration system and overflow into a proposed grate inlet catch basin which is attached to a parkway culvert. Once stormwater enters the parkway culvert it will drain into Mission Road and follow the existing drainage pattern. For emergency overflow, runoff will spill out of the proposed curb inlet catch basin, topple over the proposed driveway entrance, and sheet flow into Mission Road. Refer to separately prepared Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans for site design information. In an event where the proposed onsite storm drain system is at its full capacity or clogged, stormwater will pond up at the lowest proposed onsite sump area and excess stormwater will top over the grade break at the site’s entrance and continue to flow out through proposed driveway and into Mission Rd. During final engineering, water surface elevation will be analyzed and provided to verify all habitable structures will have at least a 1 foot of freeboard during the 100-year storm event. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), FIRM rate map Number 06037C1675F, revised September 26, 2008, the site is located within the flood zone as follows: Zone X – “Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain” The “Proposed Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map” is included in Appendix A for reference. 5.0 METHODOLOGY: The site was analyzed using the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual. The initial subarea was analyzed for acreage, land-use, soil type, peak flow rate and time of concentration according to the Rational Method described in the manual. In this preliminary hydrology study, the proposed condition impervious area percentage values were conservative estimation from the LA County Hydrology Manual. During final engineering, impervious areas will be calculated in more detail to refine all peak flow rates. In accordance with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual all habitable structures must have a finished floor elevation to allow 1 ft of freeboard during the 100-year storm event. Catch basin, pipe sizing and 100-year water surface elevation calculations will be provided during final engineering. 6 6.0 RESULTS: Hydrology Summary Pre-Developed Hydrology Summary Area ID Total Area (AC) Pervious Area (AC) Pervious (%) Impervious Area (AC) Impervious (%) Q25 (CFS) Q50 (CFS) Q100 (CFS) XA1 3.38 3.33 98.5% 0.05 1.5% 7.21 9.08 11.27 Post-Developed Hydrology Summary Area ID Total Area (AC) Pervious Area (AC) Pervious (%) Impervious Area (AC) Impervious (%) Q25 (CFS) Q50 (CFS) Q100 (CFS) A1 3.38 0.47 14.0% 2.91 86.0% 7.97 9.65 10.87 Percent Decrease: ∆25-year peak storm flow = 7.97/7.21 = increase of 10.5% ∆50-year peak storm flow = 9.65/9.08 = increase of 6.3% ∆100-year peak storm flow = 10.87/11.27 = decrease of 3.5% Refer to Appendix A & B of this report for additional information shown in the LACDPW HydroCalc output data, as well as the pre-developed and post-developed hydrology maps. Detention Sizing Compared to the existing condition the proposed development will, on average, match the existing condition. As there is a net change in overall storm event volume, detention may be required to mitigate the proposed condition peak flow rates. However, detention is required for the on-site infiltration system. This system will be designed to allow the retention of the entire Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDCv) of 8,630 CF. This retention volume will offset any increase in peak flow from the proposed development. The detention system will utilize Bioclean’s Urbanpond Detention system and sizing calculations can be found in the separately prepared Preliminary LID Report. Catch Basin Sizing Catch basin Sizing will be analyzed for the 50-year storm event peak flow rates and will be provided during final engineering. Pipe Sizing Pipe Sizing will be analyzed using WSPG software to verify hydraulic grade line (HGL) based on the 100-year storm event peak flow rates and will be provided during final engineering for proposed onsite conveyance pipe. 100-Year Water Surface Elevations Water surface elevations for the 100-year storm event peak flow rates will verify that the proposed finish floor elevations are set at least 1’ above the water surface elevation and will be calculated and provided during final engineering. 7 7.0 CONCLUSIONS: The results from this preliminary hydrology study utilizing Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual demonstrate that the proposed condition peak flow rates compared to the existing condition peak flow will stay the same as indicated in the hydrology summary results in Section 6 of this report. This is mainly due to change in grading and elongation of the proposed condition’s flow path. During final engineering, impervious area for proposed conditions will be calculated in more detail based on the finalized landscape plan. The proposed peak flow rates will be re-evaluated to reflect the actual proposed conditions. However, the proposed development is likely to generate lower peak flows. The proposed development will be graded to allow for one low point on the site equipped with a curb inlet catch basin, this catch basin will be connected to the drywell infiltration system for treatment. The storm drain system will also have detention system to retain the entire SWQDCv. In the event the storm drain system becomes clogged, the proposed grading will facilitate emergency overflow by ponding at the grate inlet catch basin, toppling over the curb and sheet flow into the Mission Rd. 8.0 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: 1. The property is in the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County rainfall region. 2. 100-year storm event flood level protection analysis required for habitable structures per the requirements of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual 3. According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual 50-Year 24-Hour Isohyet Map 1-H1.20, the drainage area is in Soil Group 006, the site receives 6.7 inches of rainfall over a 24-Hr storm (Q50). 4. The LACDPW HydroCalc was utilized to determine the time of concentration, run-off flow rate and run-off volume for site. 5. The site was analyzed for a 25, 50 and 100-year storm events per the requirements of the January 2006 Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual. The Rational Method Analysis was performed, and the appropriate calculations are provided herein. 6. The existing project site is currently a vacant lot that is 98.5% pervious based on the aerial survey performed by C&V Consulting, Inc. 7. The proposed site was assumed to be approximately 86% based on the LACDPW Hydrology Manual for “Low-Rise Apartments, Condominiums, and Townhouses” land use type. 9.0 REFERENCES: 1. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, “Hydrology Manual”, January 2006. 2. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, “HydroCalc” Outputs and Data 3. Hydraflow Express Extensions for Civil 3D 2021. 8 4. Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan for this project by C&V Consulting, Inc. February 2022 APPENDIX A HYDROLOGY MAPS Existing Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map LEGEND:Pre-Developed Hydroligic SummaryArea IDTotal Area(AC)PerviousArea (AC)Pervious(%)ImperviousArea (AC)Impervious(%)Q25 (CFS)Q50 (CFS)Q100 (CFS)XA13.383.3398.48%0.051.52%7.219.0811.27 Proposed Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map MM// // // // // // //////// // //LEGEND:Post-Developed Hydroligic SummaryArea IDTotal Area(AC)PerviousArea (AC)Pervious(%)ImperviousArea (AC)Impervious(%)Q25 (CFS)Q50 (CFS)Q100 (CFS)A13.380.4714.00%2.9186.00%7.979.6510.87 APPENDIX B HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS Existing Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25, 50, & 100-year Storm Events) Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - XA1 - 25yr.pdf Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3 Input Parameters Project Name BORS-003 Subarea ID XA1 Area (ac)3.38 Flow Path Length (ft)705.0 Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.01 50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7 Percent Impervious 0.02 Soil Type 6 Design Storm Frequency 25-yr Fire Factor 0 LID False Output Results Modeled (25-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)5.8826 Peak Intensity (in/hr)2.6625 Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.7986 Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8006 Time of Concentration (min)9.0 Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)7.205 Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)7.205 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.3725 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)16223.9942 Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - XA1 - 50yr.pdf Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3 Input Parameters Project Name BORS-003 Subarea ID XA1 Area (ac)3.38 Flow Path Length (ft)705.0 Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.01 50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7 Percent Impervious 0.02 Soil Type 6 Design Storm Frequency 50-yr Fire Factor 0 LID False Output Results Modeled (50-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)6.7 Peak Intensity (in/hr)3.2051 Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.8367 Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8379 Time of Concentration (min)8.0 Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)9.0777 Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)9.0777 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.4585 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)19970.4404 Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - XA1 - 100yr.pdf Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3 Input Parameters Project Name BORS-003 Subarea ID XA1 Area (ac)3.38 Flow Path Length (ft)705.0 Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.01 50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7 Percent Impervious 0.02 Soil Type 6 Design Storm Frequency 100-yr Fire Factor 0 LID False Output Results Modeled (100-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)7.5174 Peak Intensity (in/hr)3.829 Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.87 Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8706 Time of Concentration (min)7.0 Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)11.2669 Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)11.2669 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.5535 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)24109.2086 Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25, 50, & 100-year Storm Events) Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - A1 - 25yr.pdf Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3 Input Parameters Project Name BORS-003 Subarea ID A1 Area (ac)3.38 Flow Path Length (ft)714.0 Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009 50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7 Percent Impervious 0.86 Soil Type 6 Design Storm Frequency 25-yr Fire Factor 0 LID False Output Results Modeled (25-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)5.8826 Peak Intensity (in/hr)2.6625 Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.7986 Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8858 Time of Concentration (min)9.0 Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)7.9716 Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)7.9716 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)1.3208 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)57536.2233 Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - A1 - 50yr.pdf Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3 Input Parameters Project Name BORS-003 Subarea ID A1 Area (ac)3.38 Flow Path Length (ft)714.0 Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009 50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7 Percent Impervious 0.86 Soil Type 6 Design Storm Frequency 50-yr Fire Factor 0 LID False Output Results Modeled (50-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)6.7 Peak Intensity (in/hr)3.2051 Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.8367 Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8911 Time of Concentration (min)8.0 Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)9.6539 Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)9.6539 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)1.5093 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)65744.1478 Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - A1 - 100yr.pdf Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3 Input Parameters Project Name BORS-003 Subarea ID A1 Area (ac)3.38 Flow Path Length (ft)714.0 Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009 50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7 Percent Impervious 0.86 Soil Type 6 Design Storm Frequency 100-yr Fire Factor 0 LID False Output Results Modeled (100-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)7.5174 Peak Intensity (in/hr)3.5961 Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.8611 Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8945 Time of Concentration (min)8.0 Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)10.8731 Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)10.8731 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)1.6989 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)74006.0329 APPENDIX C Isohyet APPENDIX D Hydraulic Calculations To be provided during Final Engineering APPENDIX E As-builts & References Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 1 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page I PRELIMINARY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (LID) Prepared for: Mission Villas, LLC Attention: Mitch Gardner 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Property: 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California APN: 5389-009-029, 5389-009-030, 5389-009-031 Prepared by: C&V Consulting, Inc. 9830 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, California 92618 (949) 916-3800 Contact: Mr. Ryan Bittner, P.E. Preparation Date: February 2022 Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 1 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page II Receipt of WDID REPLACE THIS SHEET To be provided prior to final approval Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 1 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page III Notice of Intent REPLACE THIS SHEET To be provided prior to final approval Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 1 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page IV Table of Contents SECTION PAGE SECTION 1 COVER ............................................................................................................................................................................ I RECEIPT OF WDID ........................................................................................................................................................ II NOTICE OF INTENT ....................................................................................................................................................... III PROJECT OWNER’S CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................................................... V ENGINEER CERTIFICATION .......................................................................................................................................... VI SECTION 2 ................................................................................................................................................... 1 A.Contact Information/List of Responsible Parties .............................................................................................. 1 SECTION 3 ................................................................................................................................................... 2 A.References ................................................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 4 – BODY OF LID PLAN ............................................................................................................. 3 A.Objectives.................................................................................................................................................... 3 B.Project Background and Description .............................................................................................................. 3 C.Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................................... 3 D.Pre-Development Drainage Condition ............................................................................................................ 3 E.Post-Development Drainage Condition .......................................................................................................... 5 F.LID Project Types, Characteristics, & Activities ............................................................................................. 5 G.Pollutant Source Identification and BMP Selection ......................................................................................... 6 H.Source Control BMPs ................................................................................................................................... 6 I.Non-Structural BMPs ................................................................................................................................... 10 J.BMP Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair .................................................................................................... 11 K.Inspection, Maintenance, and Responsibility for BMPs ................................................................................. 12 L.Operation/Maintenance Funding after Project Completion ............................................................................. 14 List of Figures Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map Figure 2: DMP Exhibit Figure 3: Impaired Waters List of Appendices Appendix A: Volume and Flow Rate Calculations and Hydraulic Report Appendix B: Site BMPs Appendix C: Drywell System Information and Sizing Appendix D: “NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO OCEAN” Stencil Examples Appendix E: Catch Basin Cleaning Appendix F: General Education Materials Appendix G: Operations and Maintenance plan Appendix H: Geotechnical Report Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 1 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page V Project Owner’s Certification of the Preliminary Low Impact Development (LID) Plan Project Name: Mission Villas Rosemead Project Number: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83705 APN: 5389-009-029, 5389-009-030, 5389-009-031 Project Address: 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, CA 91770 This Preliminary Low Impact Development (LID) Plan for the Mission Villas Rosemead (VTTM No. 83705) project has been prepared for Mission Villas, LLC by C&V Consulting, Inc. It is intended to comply with the requirements of the City of Rosemead’s Conditions of Approval. The undersigned is authorized to approve implementation of provisions of this plan as appropriate and will strive to have the plan carried out by successors consistent with the County of Los Angeles LID Manual and the intent of the NPDES storm water requirements. "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my jurisdiction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathered the information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information submitted is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.” Owner’s Name: Erik Pfahler Owner’s Title: Senior Vice President Company: Mission Villas, LLC Address: 11766 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90025 Email: erik@borsteinenterprises.com Telephone No.: (310) 582-1991 x203 Signature: Date: Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 1 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page VI Engineer Certification Engineer’s Name: Ryan J. Bittner Engineer’s Title: Principal Company: C&V Consulting, Inc. Address: 9830 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92618 Email: rbittner@cvc-inc.net Telephone No. (949) 916-3800 I hereby certify that this Low Impact Development Plan is in compliance with, and meets the requirements set forth in, Order No. R4-2012-0175, of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. Engineer’s Signature Date Place Stamp Here Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 2 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 1 Section 2 A. Contact Information/List of Responsible Parties The homeowner’s association (HOA) contact information is: Contact: TBD Phone: TBD The Homeowner’s Association The HOA shall have primary responsibility and significant authority for the implementation, maintenance, and inspection of the property Best Management Practices (BMPs). Duties include, but are not limited to:  Implementing all elements of the Low Impact Development Plan, including but not limited to: o Implementation of prompt and effective erosion and sediment control measures o Implementing all non-storm water management, and materials and waste management activities, such as: monitoring, discharges, general site clean-up; vehicle and equipment cleaning, spill control; ensuring that nothing other than storm water enters the storm drain system, etc.  Pre-storm inspections  Storm event inspections  Post-storm inspections  Routine inspections as described in the Low Impact Development Plan  Ensuring elimination of all unauthorized discharges  The HOA shall be assigned authority to mobilize crews to make immediate repairs to the control measures.  Coordinate all the necessary corrections/repairs are made immediately, and that the project always complies with the Low Impact Development Plan.  Managing and report any Illicit Connections or Illegal Discharges. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 3 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 2 Section 3 A. References The following documents are made a part of this Low Impact Development Plan by reference:  Project plans and specifications for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 83705, prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc.  State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 2013-0001-DWQ, February 5, 2013.  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. CAS000002, Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activity.  California Stormwater BMP Handbook – Construction, November 2009.  California Stormwater BMP Handbook – New Development and Redevelopment, January 2003.  County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works L.I.D. Standards Manual, February 2014 Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 3 Section 4 – Body of LID Plan A. Objectives This Low Impact Development (LID) Plan has four main objectives: 1) Identify all pollutant sources, including sources of sediment that may affect the quality of storm water discharges associated with daily use / activity (storm water discharges) from the property site. 2) Identify non-storm water discharges. 3) Identify, construct, implement and maintain Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce or eliminate pollutants in storm water discharges and authorized non-storm water discharges from the property site. 4) Develop a maintenance schedule for BMPs designed to reduce or eliminate pollutants. B. Project Background and Description The proposed project is in Rosemead, California is approximately 3.38 net acres. The proposed development intends to construct 4 buildings of 8 attached 2-story duplex units as well as 29 2- story single family homes. These homes have private garages, private drive aisles, private yards, sidewalks, and common landscaped areas. The residential project site will be accessible with one (1) entrance/ exit along Mission Road. In the existing condition there is no cross-lot drainage as the existing residential lots have various perimeter controls surrounding them. In the proposed condition a new CMU wall will be built and therefore off-site run-on is not of concern. The pre-development conditions of the project site consist of a vacant lot covered by vegetation. Impervious cover of the pre-developed condition was determined to be 1.5% and pervious cover to be 98.5% by utilizing Topographic information. For this preliminary study, post-development impervious cover was estimated to be 86% per LACDPW Hydrology Manual land use type “Low-Rise Apartments, Condominiums, and Townhouses”. Imperviousness is to be verified with final site plan to confirm the consistency of the water quality treatment design during final engineering. C. Vicinity Map The proposed development encompasses three (3) parcels consisting of approximately 3.44 gross acres and 3.38 net acres. The site is bounded by existing residential lots to the north and east, Mission Drive to the south, and power lines owned by Southern California Edison to the west. Refer to Figure 1 for the Vicinity Map D. Pre-Development Drainage Condition All three parcels are currently a vacant lot. Besides two small service roads in southern and eastern portions of the site the site is all pervious coverage. The site is surrounded by alternating masonry block wall, wooden fence, and chain link fence around the entire property. There is existing public sidewalk and driveway entrances along Mission Drive. There are no existing Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 4 storm drain facilities located on the site and no storm drain facilities located in the adjacent portion of Mission Drive along the project frontage. The existing drainage pattern of the site is accounted for as one drainage area. The entire site sheet flows over the vacant land in a southerly direction. Stormwater appears to simply sheet flow over existing driveway entrances and enters Mission Road. Once stormwater enters Mission Rd. it flows in a southeasterly direction and enters a Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) owned catch basin approximately 500’ downstream of our site. This catch basin is connected to a LACFCD 30” RCP which flows into the Eaton Wash channel then into the Rio Hondo Channel. The Rio Hondo Channel then connects to the Los Angeles River then ultimately the Pacific Ocean. Water bodies downstream of the project site are listed on the most current 303 (d) List as follows:  Rio Hondo Channel Reach 3 o Indicator Bacteria o Iron o Oxygen, Dissolved  Rio Hondo Channel Reach 2 o Cyanide  Rio Hondo Channel Reach 1 o Copper o Indicator Bacteria o Lead o Toxicity o Trash o Zinc o pH  Los Angeles River Reach 2 o Ammonia o Copper o Indicator Bacteria o Lead o Nutrients (Algae) o Oil o Trash  Los Angeles River Reach 1 o Ammonia o Cadmium o Cyanide o Indicator Bacteria o Lead o Nutrients (Algae) o Trash o pH  Los Angeles River Estuary o Chlordane Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 5 o Toxicity o Trash  San Pedro Bay Near/ Offshore Zones o Chlordane o DDT (tissue & sediment) o PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) o Sediment Toxicity E. Post-Development Drainage Condition The proposed project consists of 8 duplex units and 29 single family homes over approximately 3.38 acres. The proposed development includes drive aisles, parking, landscaping, walkways, patios, and common open space areas. The site will be graded to collect runoff at one low point to control the amount of imported fill during grading and maintaining the existing site drainage pattern. The proposed development will utilize onsite catch basins, infiltration systems, and a detention pipe system to capture and treat stormwater. Stormwater up to the design capture volume will be infiltrated by a proposed onsite drywell system. Stormwater runoff will be conveyed via proposed onsite gutter and directed to one sump area equipped with a curb inlet catch basin. There will be two additional catch basins located along the site’s main spine in flow by conditions to convey stormwater into the underground storm drain system. The sump catch basin will be located at the end of the drive aisle at the southern property line. All on-site catch basins will be connected by storm drain pipe to the drywell infiltration system for water quality treatment. During larger storm events, stormwater runoff will back up the drywell system which is connected to the underground detention system. Larger storm events will bypass the infiltration system and overflow into a proposed grate inlet catch basin which is attached to a parkway culvert. Once stormwater enters the parkway culvert it will drain into Mission Road and follow the existing drainage pattern. For emergency overflow, runoff will spill out of the proposed curb inlet catch basin, topple over the proposed driveway entrance, and sheet flow into Mission Road. Refer to separately prepared Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans for site design information. Per Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc. dated October 27, 2021, infiltration BMPs were determined to be feasible. “Based on the results of percolation testing and analyses, the well configuration as depicted on Plate 2 may utilize a “measured” peak flow rate of 0.16 ft³/sec. This flow rate corresponds to an average peak infiltration rate of 17.0 in./hr.” Refer to Figure 2, BMP Exhibit for additional information. F. LID Project Types, Characteristics, & Activities Per the Los Angeles Department of Public Works (LACDPW), Low Impact Development Standards Manual, dated February 2014, the proposed project is classified as a “Designated Project.” A “Designated Project” is defined by the LACDPW as follows: Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 6 “Redevelopment projects, which are developments that result in creation or addition or replacement of either: (1) 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface on a site that was previously developed as described in the above bullets; or (2) 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area on a site that was previous developed as a single-family home.” G. Pollutant Source Identification and BMP Selection The following is a list of materials to be used in the daily construction activities at the project site, which will potentially contribute to pollutants, other than sediment, to storm water runoff. Control Practices for each activity are identified below:  Vehicle fluids, including oil, grease, petroleum, and coolants from personal vehicles.  Landscaping materials and wastes (topsoil, plant materials, herbicides, fertilizers, mulch, pesticides)  General trash debris and litter  Pet waste (bacteria/ fecal coliforms) The Best Management Practices (BMPs) that have been selected for implementation on this project are detailed in the following sections. H. Source Control BMPs The County of Los Angeles LID Standards Manual lists preference for selection of BMPs which includes retention-based stormwater quality control measures, biofiltration, vegetation-based storm quality control measures, and/or treatment-based stormwater quality control measures. This project has selected a retention-based stormwater quality control measure by using a drywell infiltration system. In the soils report prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc. infiltration systems were determined to be feasible as a stormwater BMP. Additionally, roof gutters will discharge to landscape areas using splash blocks when possible, creating a passive bio treatment in small planter areas prior to interception by an area drain system, catch basin, and storm drain system. All runoff from the site is tributary to the proposed onsite drywell infiltration system. As retention-based stormwater quality control measures are of the highest priority per the LA County LID Manual, the other the other stormwater quality control measures were not considered. Drywells were selected for their reduced footprint compared to other retention-based infiltration systems. Structural BMPs shall be installed by Mission Villas, LLC, the developer, through the construction and development of the project; planting and irrigation systems shall be designed by licensed landscape architects and installed by qualified contractors to specifications and standards of the City of Rosemead. The structural BMPs used for this project are summarized below. Project proponents shall implement site design concepts that achieve each of the following:  Minimize Storm Water Pollutants of Concern Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 7  Peak Storm Water Runoff Discharge Rate The following tables identify the source control and treatment BMPs and how each is implemented to achieve each site design concept. Table-1: Site Design BMPs BMP TECHNIQUE INCLUDED? BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF METHOD YES NO SD-10 Site Design & Landscape Planning X SD-11 Roof Runoff Controls X SD-12 Efficient Irrigation X SD-13 Storm Drain Signage X SD-20 Pervious Pavements X Site design does not allow for this BMP. SD-21 Alternative Building Materials X Not Applicable SD-30 Fueling Areas X Not Applicable SD-31 Maintenance Bays & Docks X Not Applicable SD-32 Trash Storage Areas X No Trash Storage Areas Proposed SD-33 Vehicle Washing Areas X Not Applicable SD-34 Outdoor Material Storage Areas X Not Applicable SD-35 Outdoor Work Areas X Not Applicable SD-36 Outdoor Processing Areas X Not Applicable Roof Runoff Controls All roof runoff will be collected and directed to splash blocks then onto grass or vegetated swales before discharging to the street or storm drain system. Area drains within the onsite landscaping between buildings will flow to onsite infiltration system where flows will be treated. Efficient Irrigation As part of the design of all common area landscape irrigation shall employ water conservation principals, including, but not limited to, such provisions as water sensors, programmable irrigation times (for short cycles), etc., will be used. Such common areas will be maintained by the HOA. Storm Drain Signage Storm Drain Signage will be provided on all proposed on-site catch basins to prevent residence from discarding pollutants to the storm drain system and potentially obstructing the proposed Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 8 BMP treatment facility. The placard or stencil will indicate the ultimate destination of the runoff entering the device. This stencil shall be always weatherproof and visible. The HOA will be responsible for maintaining the signage after the construction is completed. See Appendix D for an example. Table-2: Source Control BMPs BMP TECHNIQUE INCLUDED? BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF METHOD YES NO S-1 Storm Drain Message and Signage X S-2 Outdoor Material Storage Area X Not Applicable S-3 Outdoor Trash Storage and Waste Handling Area X Not Applicable S-4 Outdoor Loading/Unloading Dock Area X No Loading Dock Areas S-5 Outdoor Repair/Maintenance Area X No Maintenance Bays S-6 Outdoor Vehicle/Equipment’s/Accessory Washing Area X No Wash Areas S-7 Fueling Area X No Fueling Areas S-8 Landscape Irrigation Practices X S-9 Building Materials Selection X S-10 Animal Care and Handling Facilities X No Animal Care Facility S-11 Outdoor Horticulture Areas X Not Applicable Storm Drain Message and Signage Storm Drain Signage will be provided on all proposed on-site catch basins to prevent residence from discarding pollutants to the storm drain system and potentially obstructing the proposed BMP treatment facility. The placard or stencil will indicate the ultimate destination of the runoff entering the device. This stencil shall be always weatherproof and visible. The HOA will be responsible for maintaining the signage after the construction is completed. See Appendix B for an example. Landscape Irrigation Processes Management programs will be designed and established by the HOA, who will maintain the common areas within the project site. These programs will include how to mitigate the potential dangers of fertilizer and pesticide usage (refer to the Maintenance and Frequency Table). Ongoing maintenance will be consistent with the State of California Model- Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Fertilizer and pesticide usage shall be consistent with County Management Guidelines for use of Fertilizers and Pesticides. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 9 Building Materials Selection Material selection will minimize the use of copper, galvanized metals and other materials that could add significant amounts of harmful pollutants to stormwater runoff. Table-3: Stormwater Quality Control BMPs BMP NAME INCLUDED? IF NOT APPLICABLE, STATE BRIEF REASON YES NO RET-1 Bioretention X Used alternative method – Drywell System RET-2 Infiltration Basin X Used alternative method – Drywell System RET-3 Infiltration Trench X Used alternative method – Drywell System RET-4 Drywell X A Maxwell Plus Drywell System will be used on this site. RET-5 Permeable Pavement without an Underdrain X Used alternative method – Drywell System RET-6 Rain Barrel/Cistern X Used alternative method – Drywell System BIO-1 Biofiltration X Used alternative method – Drywell System VEG-1 Green Roof X Space not available for BMP VEG-2 Stormwater Planter X Used alternative method – Drywell System VEG-3 Tree-Well Filter X Used alternative method – Drywell System VEG-4 Vegetated Swales X Space not available for BMP VEG-5 Vegetated Filter Strip X Space not available for BMP T-1 Sand Filter X Space not available for BMP T-2 Constructed Wetland X This is not a wetland area/ development T-3 Extended Detention Basin X Space not available for BMP T-4 Wet Pond X This is not a wetland area/ development T-5 Permeable Pavement with an Underdrain X Used alternative method – Drywell System RET-4 Drywell Storm water will enter the drywell unit via curb openings throughout the site and flow via pipe directly onto specially designed pretreatment chamber. The pretreatment chamber is designed intercept the majority of the first flows during a rain event and reduce the impact of sediment and debris on the system. After the pretreatment chamber fills up stormwater will flow into the main drywell system where it will be infiltrated. A detention system located upstream of the drywell will have a high-flow bypass inlet for flows greater than the 85th percentile storm event. See Appendix C for drywell sizing calculations. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 10 I. Non-Structural BMPs Non-structural BMPs are generally managerial, educational, inspection and/ or maintenance oriented. These items consist of educating employees and occupants, developing, and implementing HOA guidelines, implementing BMPs and enforcing Code requirements. Non- structural BMPs used for this project are summarized below: Education for Employees and Occupants Practical informational materials will be provided to occupants, the HOA and employees on general good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality. Among other things, these materials will describe the use of chemicals (including household type) that should be limited to the property, with no discharge of specified wastes via hosing or other direct discharge to gutters, catch basins and storm drains. This program must be maintained, enforced, and updated periodically by the HOA. Educational materials including, but not limited to, the materials included in the Appendix F of this plan will be made available to the employees and contractors of the HOA. Activity Restrictions Activities on this site will be limited to activities related to residential living. The Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) will outline the activities that are restricted on the property. Such activities related to the LID include car washing, car maintenance and disposal of used motor fluids, pet waste cleanup, and trash container areas. Common Area Landscape Management Management programs will be designed and established by the HOA, who will maintain the common areas within the project site. These programs will include how to mitigate the potential dangers of fertilizer and pesticide usage, require that fertilizer and pesticide usage shall be consistent with City and County guidelines, discuss utilization of water-efficient landscaping practices, require that maintenance be consistent with any Los Angeles County water conservation resolutions or City of Rosemead equivalent, and detail the proper disposal of landscape wastes. Ongoing maintenance will be consistent with the State of California Model Water-Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Fertilizer and pesticide usage shall be consistent with County Management Guidelines for use of Fertilizers and Pesticides. Common Area Litter Control The HOA will be required to implement trash management and litter control procedures in the common areas aimed at reducing pollution of drainage water. The HOA may also contract with their landscape maintenance firm to provide this service during regularly scheduled maintenance, which should consist of litter patrol, emptying of trash receptacles in common areas, and noting trash disposal violations and reporting the violations to the HOA for remediation. Street Sweeping in Private Streets and Parking Lots The HOA shall have all streets and parking lots swept on a weekly basis. This procedure will be intensified around October 15th of each year prior to and throughout rainstorm period. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 11 Drainage Facility Inspection & Maintenance The HOA will be responsible for implementing each of the BMPs detailed in this plan. The HOA will also be responsible for cleaning and maintaining the BMPs on a regular basis. Refer to Appendix G for the Operation and Maintenance Plan. Refer to Appendix B for site specific drainage BMP information. Title 22 CC&R Compliance The HOA will comply with this Regulation as part of the development’s CC&Rs. CC&Rs will be prepared as a separate document and reviewed by the City’s Attorney. Uniform Fire Code Implementation The HOA will comply with this Code as part of the development’s CC&Rs. CC&Rs will be prepared as a separate document and reviewed by the City’s Attorney Employee Training/Education Program A training program will be established as it would apply to future employees, contractors, and homeowners of the HOA to inform and train in maintenance activities regarding the impact of dumping oil, paints, solvents, or other potentially harmful chemicals into storm drains; the proper use of fertilizers and pesticides in landscaping maintenance practices; and the impacts of littering and improper water disposal. The HOA (or a hired firm) will conduct the training program which will include targeted training sessions with specific construction disciplines (landscaping, concrete finishers, painters, etc.). See Appendix F for examples of educational materials that will be provided to the Employees. The project’s O&M will include provisions for future employee training programs conducted on a yearly based prior to the rainy season. J. BMP Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair Inspections will be conducted as follows:  Annually prior to the start of the rainy season (Oct. 1st- May 31st)  Every (1) month during rainy season  At any other time(s) or intervals of time specified in the contract documents An inspection form shall be completed at least once per year prior to the start of the rainy season. This inspection check sheet (see Appendix G) shall be included in this report and always kept onsite. The check sheet should be filled out completely and clearly indicate any BMPs that need repair or maintenance. These repairs and/ or maintenance procedures shall be carried out at the soonest possible time. A legible log shall be kept on site to record the inspection of the storm water pollution abatement control measures. The record must contain the following information: (i) type of maintenance activities or source-control practices; (ii) date the activities are completed; and (iii) the name of the operator performing the activities. During transfer of ownership/operation of the facility, the Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 12 current owner must notify the new owner/operator of the BMPs and the associated maintenance activities that also transfer to the new owner/operator of the property. See Appendix G. K. Inspection, Maintenance, and Responsibility for BMPs The following tables list the post-construction BMPs (routine non-structural and structural), the required ongoing maintenance, the inspection and maintenance frequency, the inspection criteria, and the entity or party responsible for implementation, maintenance, and/or inspection. Table-4: Non-Structural BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix BMP RESPONSIBILITY FREQUENCY Homeowner/ Business owner Education, Activity Restrictions HOA will provide educational materials. Those materials and responsibilities must be passed onto subsequent property owners. Continuous. CC&Rs to be provided to homeowners at the time they purchase the property and updates provided by the HOA as they occur. Common Area Landscape Management HOA will appoint a landscape maintenance contractor Monthly during regular maintenance and use with management guidelines for use of fertilizers and pesticides. Parking Areas and Drives Management HOA will appoint a landscape maintenance contractor The Drives Aisles are to be swept on a routine scheduled basis to facilitate the pickup of trash and debris (plant or otherwise) and to remove excessive oil, grease, and build-up. During sweeping, debris is to be removed from the parking areas and drives and then scrubbed and rinsed. This sweeping schedule will be at a minimum occurrence of once a week and as necessary to rid / reduce active pollutants from the pavement areas. This maintenance requirement will be listed in the Convent, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of this project. These CC&Rs will be recorded to the property at the County Recorder’s Office and be included on the final Title report of these properties. Litter Control by Sweeping HOA will appoint a landscape maintenance contractor. Weekly inspection of trash receptacles to ensure that lids are closed and pick up any excess trash on the ground, noting trash disposal violations to the HOA for remediation. Employee Training HOA will appoint a landscape contractor after construction. Monthly for maintenance personnel and employees to include the educational materials contained in the approved LID. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 13 BMP RESPONSIBILITY FREQUENCY Common Area Catch Basin Inspection & Cleaning HOA will appoint a landscape maintenance contractor for common areas and storm drain facilities. Inspect basins once a month. Clean debris and silt in bottom of catch basins as needed. Intensified on or about October 15th each year or prior to the first 24-hour storm event, whichever occurs first. Refer to Appendix E. Table-5: Structural BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix BMP RESPONSIBILITY FREQUENCY Common Area Efficient Irrigation HOA will appoint a landscape contractor after construction Once a week, in conjunction with maintenance activities. Verify that runoff minimizing landscape design continues to function by checking that water sensors are functioning properly, that irrigation heads are adjusted properly to eliminate overspray to hardscape areas, and to verify that irrigation timing and cycle lengths are adjusted in accordance with water demands, given time of year, weather and day or nighttime temperatures. Common Area Runoff Efficient Landscape Design HOA will appoint a landscaping contractor Once a week in conjunction with maintenance activities and prior to finalizing any replanting schemes. Verify that plants continue to be grouped according to similar water requirements to reduce excess irrigation runoff. Catch Basin Stenciling HOA A warning stencil will be painted on top and in view with the words: “No-Dumping – Drains to Ocean” At all catch basin, drain inlets draining to the street or storm drain system. See Appendix “B” (example). Once every 6 months, inspect for re- stenciling needs. Re-stencil as needed immediately. Maxwell Plus Drywell System HOA Maxwell Plus Drywell System maintenance will conform to manufacturer’s specifications. Please see additional information in Appendix C Stormwater Detention System HOA Stormwater detention system maintenance will conform to manufacturer’s specifications. Oldcastle FloGard Catch Basin Insert Filters HOA Oldcastle FloGard catch basin insert filter maintenance will conform to manufacturer’s specifications. See additional information in Appendix C Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Section 4 Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 14 L. Operation/Maintenance Funding after Project Completion The post-construction BMPs as described above will be funded and maintained by: The Homeowner’s Association Maintenance and requirements of the maintenance for the properties will be listed in the Convent, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of this project and will be the responsibility of the property owner at all times. These CC&Rs will be recorded to the property at the County Recorder’s Office and be included on the Title report of these properties. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Figure -1: Project Vicinity Map Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Figure -2: BMP Exhibit MM// // // // // // //////// // // Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Figure -3: Impaired Waters ?Ý !"^$ AÐ %&g( %&g(Aà %&l( %&l( %&l( !"`$ !"`$ !"`$ %&o( %&o( ?q ?q ?º %&e( %&e( ?Õ %&q( %&q( %&d( %&d( ?»?» AË IÄ IÄ Aÿ AVAVBVHUGHES BVDR STSTSTBVNN RDBVF E L I ZLOS AVBVAVR D 6TH PYB VCANYONANGELES M T R E D BOX PY BV TUJUNGA R D BVHY HYRDBV BV BVARTESIA MAGIC WOODMANAVWY BVLABVVAN NUYSRDBVBVMAGNOLIAAVBV STVINELANDAVAVTAMPAMOUNTAIN BV DR COLORADO HUNTINGTON RD L I V EST RD O A KFRANCISQUITOO L D SHERMAN BALBOAFALLBROOKAVM A Y O DRLY O N S AV RDSANDTHE RDSANARROYOA R R O WAV DR FOOTHILL F OOTH I L LSAN FERNANDOBV RDROSCOEBVDEVONSHIRE HY WILSHIRESUNSET BV RD MTBVLAKEBVST IMPERIAL BL VENTURA BLVICTORY WY CARSON COAST 25THST ALAMITOS AVAV BVMAINB ST ST ST ARTESIA BV NORWALKFIRESTONE ATLANTICBVBV BV HYLEFFINGWELLRD BV COLIMANORWALKBV A V AVST CARSON 7TH ATLANTICWILLOW BV HY ST HYPEARBLOSSOM HYSIERRA 87 THST EFORT TEJON H YRDVIRGENESLASCANYONMALIBUMULHOLLANDVALLEYCIRCLE SUNLANDTUXFORDHILL GLENDALEVERDUGOH U N TIN G TO N MISSIONMAIN PECKBO UQUETS O L E D A D CANYON SIERRASECO CYNFERNANDOV A LEN C IA RDSANCANYONCANYON BIG CRESTANGELESFO R E STGLEASONANGELESCRESTFOOT AVWILSON PACIFIC SEPULVEDA HAWTHORNEWESTERNWILMINGTONBRO ADW AYVALLEYMAIN HACIENDALITTLETUJUNGAMANCHESTER BREAROSECRANS O C EA NALA MEDAROSEMEADTOPANGASUNSETCANYON WHITTIER LINCOLN H E N R Y L A S T U N A S DR SLAUSON GLENDORA AVSTGAFFEYSEPULVEDAPACIFICAVLAKEWOODBVCOUNT YORANGES A N TA CLA R A RIVERS A N TA CLARA RIV E RLOS ANGELES RIV E R LOS ANGELESRIVERRIVERLOS ANGELESSANGABRIELRIVERSA NGABRIELRIVERW EST SAN GABRIE L ENCINORESERVOIR UPPERFRANKLINRESERVOIR HOLLYWOODRESERVOIR SILVER LAKERESERVOIR LEGG LAKE BIGSANTAANITARESERVOIR SAWPITCANYONRESERVOIR COGSWELLRESERVOIR BIG TUJUNGARESERVOIR PACOIMARESERVOIR HANSENDAM LITTLE ROCKRESERVOIR DRY CANYONRESERVOIR SEPULVEDA FLOODCONTROL BASIN STONECANYONRESERVOIR LOWERFRANKLINCANYONRESERVOIR HARBORLAKE CHATSWORTHRESERVOIR WHITTIER NARROWS DAM SANTA FE DAM EATONWASHDAM DEVIL'SGATEDAM& RES LOS ANGELESRESERVOIR SANTA MONICARUSTICCANYONMANDEVILLE CANYON CHANNELSULLIVAN CANYONCHANNEL CANYON CHANNELR EXF O R D CHANNELCOLDWATERCANYONCHANNELCH AN NELA L H A MB R A BENEDICT CANYONCHANNEL COLDWATERCHANNELB E N E DIC T C A N Y O N C H A N N E L SYCAMORE CANYON ARROYO SECOC R E EK WASH SAN PAS Q UAL MILL CREEKCREEKCABALLEROENCINO CHANNELT U J U N G A W A S H CENTRAL BRANCH WASHB U R B A N K WE S T E R N S Y S T E M V E R D U G O WASH SYCAM ORE W ASHDEAD HORSE CANYON CHANNELSYCAMORE-SCHOLL DIVERSIONROYAL CANYON CHANNELREYNOLDSCOURT LAT CHESEBORO CANYON CHANNEL VAN TASSEL CANYONCHANNELMADDOCKCHANNELSPINKSCHANNELBRADBURYCHANNELDRY CANYONSOUTH FORKDRY CANYON CHANNELS A W TE LLE C H A N N EL ARROYO SECOCHANNEL SCHOLLCHANNEL CHANNEL SYCAMORECANYON CLEMENTSLATERALC A S C A D IA L A T E R A L LENORECHANNELCHANNELBUENA VISTA BUENA VISTACHANNEL SIE R R A M A D R E W A S H SAWPIT WASHBRADBURY CHANNELBALLONA CREEK CREEKARCADIAARCADIA EAST BRANCH WASHBALDWIN AVE.LIMA ST.SAN JOSE PUENTECREEKWASHRUBIOW ASH WASH E A T O N RIO HONDO CHANNELBIG DALTON WASHWALN U T C HA N N EL WALNUT CHANNEL CREEK CRE E K DRAINWILLMINGTONDOMINGUEZ CHANNEL RIO HONDOVERDENORTH FORKTACOBICREEKCOMPTON DOMINGUEZ WASHANDERSONCREEKBALLONA COMPTON CREEKLAGUNADOMINGUEZ F.C.S C H A N N E L EAST BRANCHCHANNELLA MIRADACREEKLA CANADACOYOTECOYOTECREEKC OY O T E LOS CERRITOS CHANNEL ATBELLCHANNEL CENTINELA CREEK SEP ULVE DA C HA N N EL SEPULVEDA CHANNELCREEKCASTAIC SYSTE M W ESTERN BURBANK CHANNEL PEARLAND VIOLIN GOVERNOR CANYON CHANNELACTON CANYONCHANNELACTONCANYONRED ROVERCANYON CHANNELS H A N N O N V ALLEY CANYON BOUQUET CANYONTEXAS CANYON CANYON HASLEY POLE CANYONCANYONMINTCHANNELBOUQUET CANYON SANTA CLARA RIVER SOUTH FORK LIVE OAK S P RIN G S C A N Y O N OAK SPRING CANYON SAND CANYONCREEK PLACERITA SA NTA CLAR A RIV E R S O UTH F O RK CH A N NEL MAY CANYON CHANNELKAGELCANYONCHANNELCHANNEL MANSFIELD BU L L C RE E K R E S E R V OI R B R A N C H EAST CANYON CHANNEL SYLMAR CHANNEL CANYONWILSONSOMBRERO CYNCHANNELSTETSON CYN CHANNELSOMBRERO CHANNELHOG CANYONCHANNELCANYONCHANNELLOPEZDIVERSIONPACOIMABULL CREEK CREEKLIMEKILNEAST BRANCHALISO CREEKHANSENHEIGHTSCHANNEL TUJUNGA WASHPAC OIMACREEK ALISO CREEKLIMEKILN CREEK CREEKWILBURSANTA SUSANA CREEKDAYTON CREEK BULLSOUTH CHANNEL - PACOIMA WASHCHA T S WO RT HCRE E K BELL CREEKCREEK CALABASASCREEKCREEKBROWNSSOUTHB E L L CREEKESCORPIONFORKC R E E KBELL BROWNS CREEKCHIQUITO CANYON SAN MARTINEZ-SPILLWAYCANYON DRYCANYONCANYONSAN FRANCISQUITOHASKELL CANYONNEWHALL IRON CANYONSAND CANYONVASQUEZ CANYON CHANNELP L U M C A N Y O N C H A N N E L RABBIT CANYON SOLEDADCANYON LITTLE ROCK WASHA Q U E D U C TAQUEDUCT CHANNEL CENTRAL BRANCH WASHC H A N D L E R C A N Y O N L IT T L E T U J U N G A W A S H CHANNELL A T U N A C A N Y O N C H A N N E L VERDUGO WASH GOSS CYN.INLETQUAILCREEKCLOUD CREEKCHANNELEAGLE WARDCHANNELCHANNELCANYONDUNSMUIRCHANNELCANYONCOOKSSHIELDS CANYONSUNSET LATALTADE NA SYSTEM RUBIO RUBIODIVERSIONWASHGOOSEBERRYCREEKCHANNEL ROWLEYCANYON ZACHAUCHANNEL BLANCHARDCANYONCHANNELBLUEGUMCANYONCHANNEL WEBBERCANYONCHANNELBURBANK EASTERN SYSTEM CHANNELHILLCRESTBRAND CANYON CHANNELCHILDSCANYON CHANNELELMWOODCANYON CHANNELENGLEHEARDCANYON CHANNEL WASHV E R D U G OMCCLURE CHANLOCKHEEDCHANNEL CHANNELCANYONSTOUGHHAINES CANYONCHANNELPICKENS CANYON CHANNELHALLS CANYON CHANNELWINERY CANYON CHANNELHAY CANYON CHANNELFLINT CANYON CHANNELGOULD CANYONPARADISECANYON CHANNELCHANNELWASHCANYONANITA S A N T A LITTLE CANYONBAILEYSIERRA MADRE VILLA CHANNELCARRIAGE HOUSECANYONAUBURNCHANNELLANNANCHANNELCANYONANITASANTAARCADIACALIFORNIA LATERALWASHPACOIMACREEKWASHSANTAANITACHANNELTEMPLECITY P A C I F I C OC E ANLos Angeles River Watershed LOSANGELES LONGBEACH SANTACLARITA CARSON PASADENA TORRANCE BURBANK WHITTIER DOWNEY COMPTON CALABASAS NORWALK CERRITOS LAKEWOOD INGLEWOOD DUARTE MALIBU ALHAMBRA SOUTHGATE SANTAMONICA LAMIRADA BELL HAWTHORNE MONTEREYPARK ELSEGUNDO SANMARINO GLENDALE MONROVIA ARCADIA IRWINDALE PICORIVERA VERNON MONTEBELLO GARDENA PALMDALE COMMERCE RANCHOPALOSVERDES INDUSTRY ELMONTE LYNWOOD ROSEMEAD BELLFLOWER BALDWINPARK PARAMOUNT SANTAFESPRINGS CULVERCITY REDONDOBEACH BEVERLYHILLS LACANADAFLINTRIDGE WESTCOVINA LOMITA SANGABRIEL LAHABRAHEIGHTS LAPUENTE ARTESIA PALOSVERDESESTATES ROLLINGHILLS LAWNDALEMANHATTANBEACH SOUTHPASADENA SIGNALHILL CUDAHY SOUTHELMONTE ROLLINGHILLSESTATES BELLGARDENS HUNTINGTONPARK HIDDENHILLS SANFERNANDO MAYWOOD WESTHOLLYWOOD HERMOSABEACH HAWAIIANGARDENS PICO LANG ACTON WATTS PALMS ATHENS SAUGUS NAPLES MONETA LENNOX VENICE AGOURA RESEDA NEWHALL SOLEDAD CASTAIC MAYFAIR BASSETT TOPANGA TARZANA TUJUNGA PACOIMA BIG ROCK GLENVIEW VALENCIA PINETREE LAKEVIEW WALTERIA ROSEWOOD EL PORTO FLORENCE CRENSHAW WESTLAKE MID CITY WESTWOOD FERNWOOD VAN NUYS ALTADENA WINNETKA DEL VALLE VAL VERDE SAN PEDRO MIRALESTE DOMINGUEZ HOLLYDALE HYDE PARK VIEW PARK FOX HILLS MAR VISTA KOREATOWN BRENTWOOD ECHO PARK LOS FELIZOLD CANYON AGUA DULCE WILMINGTON OCEAN PARK MONTE NIDO EAGLE ROCK SUN VALLEYNORTHRIDGE WEST HILLS CHATSWORTH OLIVE VIEW MINT CANYON HARBOR CITY WALNUT PARK WILLOWBROOK WESTCHESTER RANCHO PARK SYLVIA PARK CANOGA PARK FORREST PARK BIXBY KNOLLS LEIMERT PARK CITY TERRACECENTURY CITY BEVERLY GLEN VASQUEZ ROCKS PLAYA DEL REY WINDSOR HILLS BALDWIN HILLS BOYLE HEIGHTS CHEVIOT HILLS CASTELLAMMARE HIGHLAND PARK MT WASHINGTONGLASSELL\PARK MOUNT OLYMPUS WARNER CENTER MISSION HILLSGRANADA HILLS CANYON COUNTRY HARBOR GATEWAY MARINA DEL REY JEFFERSON PARK UNIVERSAL CITY VALLEY VILLAGEWOODLAND HILLS CALABASAS PARK SULPHUR SPRINGS STEVENSON RANCH TERMINAL ISLAND NORWOOD VILLAGE ATWATER VILLAGE BEL AIR ESTATES NORTH HOLLYWOOD CASTAIC JUNCTION RANCHO DOMINGUEZ NORTH LONG BEACH MORNINGSIDE PARK HACIENDA HEIGHTS EAST LOS ANGELES HOLLYWOOD RIVIERA SOUTH SAN GABRIELCOUNTRY CLUB PARK PACIFIC PALISADES LAKE VIEW TERRACE BIG MOUNTAIN RIDGE PALISADES HIGHLANDS CALABASAS HIGHLANDS REF: \\pwgisd02\mpmgis$\MPMGIS\projects\mpm\gismaps\wk_2627\lariver_wtrsheds.mxd DATE: 08/22/07 Data contained in this map is produced in wholeor part from the Los Angeles County Departmentof Public Works' digital database. 0 2 41 MILES I Mapping & Property Management Division, Mapping & GIS Services Section LEGEND LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERSHED UNINCORPORATED AREA DAM / LAKE / RESERVOIR MAJOR RIVER MAJOR CHANNEL Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Appendix A: Volume and Flow Rate Calculations and Hydrologic Report The proposed development was analyzed for the 0.75-in storm event and the 85th Percentile storm event using the LACDPW HydroCalc software. The governing stormwater runoff volume between the two storm events was utilized for design. Below is a summary of the HydroCalc outputs: DMA 85th Percentile Storm  0.75-in Storm Governing Volume (cf) Volume (cf) Flowrate (cfs) Volume (cf) Flowrate (cfs) 1 8,629.68 0.5731 7,191.44 0.4485 8,629.69 Refer to LACDPW HydroCalc Output Data within this Appendix for Volume and Flowrate Calculations. Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/LID/Preliminary/Appendix A - Calcs/BORS-003 - DMA 1 - 85%.pdf Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3 Input Parameters Project Name BORS-003 Subarea ID DMA 1 Area (ac)3.38 Flow Path Length (ft)714.0 Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009 85th Percentile Rainfall Depth (in)0.9 Percent Impervious 0.86 Soil Type 6 Design Storm Frequency 85th percentile storm Fire Factor 0 LID True Output Results Modeled (85th percentile storm) Rainfall Depth (in)0.9 Peak Intensity (in/hr)0.2152 Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.1 Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.788 Time of Concentration (min)35.0 Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)0.5731 Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)0.5731 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.1981 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)8629.6809 Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/LID/Preliminary/Appendix A - Calcs/BORS-003 - DMA 1 - .75in.pdf Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3 Input Parameters Project Name BORS-003 Subarea ID DMA 1 Area (ac)3.38 Flow Path Length (ft)714.0 Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009 0.75-inch Rainfall Depth (in)0.75 Percent Impervious 0.86 Soil Type 6 Design Storm Frequency 0.75 inch storm Fire Factor 0 LID True Output Results Modeled (0.75 inch storm) Rainfall Depth (in)0.75 Peak Intensity (in/hr)0.1684 Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.1 Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.788 Time of Concentration (min)40.0 Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)0.4485 Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)0.4485 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.1651 24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)7191.4357 Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Appendix B: Site BMPs County of Los Angeles D-1 February 2014 S-1: Storm Drain Message and Signage Purpose Waste material dumped into storm drain inlets can adversely impact surface and groundwaters. In fact, any material discharged into the storm drain system has the potential tosignificantly impact downstream receiving waters. Storm drain messages have becomea popular method of alerting and reminding the public about the effects of and the prohibitions against waste disposal into the storm drain system. The signs are typicallystenciled or affixed near the storm drain inlet or catch basin. The message simplyinforms the public that dumping of wastes into storm drain inlets is prohibited and/or thatthe drain ultimately discharges into receiving waters. General Guidance x The signs must be placed so they are easily visible to the public. x Be aware that signs placed on sidewalk will be worn by foot traffic. Design Specifications x Signs with language and/or graphical icons that prohibit illegal dumping,mustbeposted at designated public access points along channels and streams within the project area. Consult with Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) staff to determine specific signage requirements for channels andstreams. x Storm drain message markers, placards, concrete stamps, or stenciledlanguage/icons (e.g., “No Dumping – Drains to the Ocean”) are required at all storm drain inlets and catch basins within the project area to discourage illegal or inadvertent dumping. Signs should be placed in clear sight facing anyoneapproaching the storm drain inlet or catch basin from either side (see Figure D-1and Figure D-2). LACDPW staff should be contacted to determine specificrequirements for types of signs and methods of application. A stencil can be purchased for a nominal fee from LACDPW Building and Safety Office by calling (626) 458-3171. All storm drain inlet and catch basin locations must be identifiedon the project site map. Maintenance Requirements Legibility and visibility of markers and signs should be maintained (e.g., signs should berepainted or replaced as necessary). If required by LACDPW, the owner/operator or homeowner’s association shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the agency orrecord a deed restriction upon the property title to maintain the legibility of placards andsigns. S-1: Storm Drain Message and Signage County of Los Angeles D-2 February 2014 Figure D-1. Storm Drain Message Location – Curb Type Inlet Figure D-2. Storm Drain Message Location – Catch Basin/Area Type Inlet CONCRETE PERIMETER County of Los Angeles D-19 February 2014 S-8: Landscape Irrigation Practices Purpose Irrigation runoff provides a pathway for pollutants (i.e., nutrients, bacteria, organics,sediment) to enter the storm drain system. By effectively irrigating, less runoff isproduced resulting in less potential for pollutants to enter the storm drain system. General Guidance x Do not allow irrigation runoff from the landscaped area to drain directly tostorm drain system. x Minimize use of fertilizer, pesticides, and herbicides on landscaped areas. x Plan sites with sufficient landscaped area and dispersal capacity (e.g.,ability toreceive irrigation water without generating runoff). x Consult a landscape professional regarding appropriate plants, fertilizer, mulching applications, and irrigation requirements (if any) to ensure healthyvegetation growth. Design Specifications x Choose plants that minimize the need for fertilizer and pesticides. x Group plants with similar water requirements and water accordingly. x Use mulch to minimize evaporation and erosion. x Include a vegetative boundary around project site to act as a filter. x Design the irrigation system to only water areas that need it. x Install an approved subsurface drip, pop-up, or other irrigation system. 1 The irrigation system should employ effective energy dissipation and uniformflow spreading methods to prevent erosion and facilitate efficient dispersion. x Install rain sensors to shut off the irrigation system during and after storm events. x Include pressure sensors to shut off flow-through system in case of suddenpressure drop. A sudden pressure drop may indicate a broken irrigation heador water line. x If the hydraulic conductivity in the soil is not sufficient for the necessary waterapplication rate, implement soil amendments to avoid potential geotechnicalhazards (i.e., liquefaction, landslide, collapsible soils, and expansive soils). 1 If alternative distribution systems (e.g., spray irrigation) are approved, the County will establishguidelines to implement these new systems. S-8: Landscape Irrigation Practices County of Los Angeles D-20 February 2014 x For sites located on or within 50 feet of a steep slope (15% or greater), do notirrigate landscape within three days of a storm event to avoid potential geotechnical instability. 2 x Implement Integrated Pest Management practices. For additional guidelines and requirements, refer to the Los Angeles CountyDepartment of Health Services. Maintenance Requirements Maintain irrigation areas to remove trash and debris and loose vegetation. Rehabilitate areas of bare soil. If a rain or pressure sensor is installed, it should be checkedperiodically to ensure proper function. Inspect and maintain irrigation equipment andcomponents to ensure proper functionality. Clean equipment as necessary to preventalgae growth and vector breeding. Maintenance agreements between LACDPW and the owner/operator may be required. Failure to properly maintain building and property may subject the property owner to citation. 2 As determined by the City of Los Angeles, Building and Safety Division County of Los Angeles D-21 February 2014 S-9: Building Materials Selection Purpose Building materials can potentially contribute pollutants of concern to stormwater runoffthrough leaching. For example, metal buildings, roofing, and fencing materials may besignificant sources of metals in stormwater runoff, especially due to acidic precipitation.The use of alternative building materials can reduce pollutant sources in stormwater runoff by eliminating compounds that can leach into stormwater runoff. Alternativebuilding materials may also reduce the need to perform maintenance activities (i.e.,painting) that involve pollutants of concern, and may reduce the volume of stormwaterrunoff. Alternative materials are available to replace lumber and paving. Design Specifications Lumber Decks and other house components constructed using pressure-treated woodthatistypically treated using arsenate, copper, and chromium compounds are hazardous tothe environment. Pressure-treated wood may be replaced with cement-fiberorvinyl. Roofs, Fencing, and Metals Minimizing the use of copper and galvanized (zinc-coated) metals on buildings and fencing can reduce leaching of these pollutants into stormwater runoff. The followingbuilding materials are conventionally made of galvanized metals: x Metal roofs; x Chain-link fencing and siding; and x Metal downspouts, vents, flashing, and trim on roofs. Architectural use of copper for roofs and gutters should be avoided. As an alternative tocopper and galvanized materials, coated metal products are available for both roofingand gutter application. Vinyl-coated fencing is an alternative to traditional galvanizedchain-link fences. These products eliminate contact of bare metal with precipitation or stormwater runoff, and reduce the potential for stormwater runoff contamination. Roofing materials are also made of recycled rubber and plastic. Green roofs may be an option. Green roofs use vegetation such as grasses and otherplants as an exterior surface. The plants reduce the velocity of stormwater runoff andabsorb water to reduce the volume of stormwater runoff. One potential problem with using green roofs in the Los Angeles County area is the long, hot and dry summers, which may kill the plants if they are not watered. See the Green Roof Fact Sheet (RET-7) in Appendix E. S-9: Building Materials Selection County of Los Angeles D-22 February 2014 Pesticides The use of pesticides around foundations can be reduced through the use of alternative barriers. Sand barriers can be applied around foundations to deter termites, as they cannot tunnel through sand. Metal shields also block termites from tunneling.Additionally, diatomaceous earth can be used to repel or kill a wide varietyofotherpests. Maintenance Requirements The integrity of structural elements that are subject to damage (e.g., signs) must be maintained by the owner/operator as required by local codes and ordinances. Maintenance agreements between LACDPW and the owner/operator may be required.Failure to properly maintain building and property may subject the property owner tocitation. County of Los Angeles E-32 February 2014 RET-4: Dry Well Description A dry well is a bored, drilled, or driven shaft or hole whose depth is greater than its width. A dry well may either be a small excavated pit filled with aggregate or a prefabricated storage chamber or pipe segment. Dry well design and function are similar to infiltration trenches in that they are designed to temporarily store and subsequently infiltrate stormwater runoff. In particular, dry wells can be used to reduce the volume of stormwater runoff from building roofs. While generally not a significant source of stormwater runoff pollution, roofs are one of the most important sources of new or increased stormwater runoff volume from land development sites. Dry wells can be used to indirectly enhance water quality by reducing the volume of stormwater runoff to be treated by other downstream stormwater quality control measures. A schematic of a typical dry well is presented in Figure E-4. LID Ordinance Requirements Dry wells can be used to meet the on-site retention requirements of the LID Ordinance. Dry wells will prevent pollutants in the SWQDv from being discharged off-site. Advantages · Requires minimal space to install · Low installation costs · Provide groundwater recharge · Reduces peak stormwater runoff flows during small storm events County of Los Angeles Figure E- County of Los Angeles -4. Dry Well Schematic County of Los Angeles . Dry Well Schematic E-33 RETRET-4: Dry Well February 2014 4: Dry Well February 2014 RET-4: Dry Well County of Los Angeles E-34 February 2014 Disadvantages · Is not appropriate for areas with low permeability soils or high groundwater levels · May not be appropriate for industrial sites or locations with contaminated soils or where spills may occur because of the potential threat to groundwater contamination · Cannot receive untreated stormwater runoff except from rooftops · Requires complete reconstruction for failed dry wells · Is not suitable for fill sites or on steep slopes General Constraints and Implementation Considerations · Dry wells can be integrated into open space buffers and other landscape areas. · The potential for groundwater contamination must be carefully considered,. Dry wells are not suitable for sites that: o Use or store chemicals or hazardous materials, unless they are prevented from entering the well; or o Un-remediated “brownfield sites” where there is known groundwater or soil contamination · Dry wells should be sited away from tree drip lines and kept free of vegetation. · If the corrected in-situ infiltration rate exceed 2.4 in/hr, then stormwater runoff may need to be fully-treated with an upstream stormwater quality control measure prior to infiltration to protect groundwater quality. · Dry wells cannot be located on sites with a slope greater than 20 percent (5:1). · Pretreatment to remove sediment is required to protect dry wells from high sediment loads. · If a yard drain is proposed as part of the design, it must be designed so that any standing water in the catch basin will infiltrate within 96 hours. · If possible, the entire tributary area of the dry well should be stabilized before construction begins. If this is not possible, all flows should be diverted around the dry well to protect it from sediment loads during construction or the top two inches of soil from the dry well bottom should be removed after the site has been stabilized. Excavated material should be stored such that it cannot be washed back into the dry well if a storm occurs during construction. · The equipment used to construct the dry well should have extra wide low- pressure tires. Construction traffic should not enter the dry well because it can compact soil, which reduces infiltration capacity. If heavy equipment is used on the base of the dry well, the infiltrative capacity may be restored by tilling or aerating prior to placing the infiltrative bed. RET-4: Dry Well County of Los Angeles E-35 February 2014 · Clean, washed gravel should be placed in the excavated dry well in lifts and lightly compacted with a plate compactor. Use of unwashed gravel can result in clogging. · A geomembrane liner should be installed generously with overlapping seams on sides, bottom, and one foot below the surface of the dry well. · Once construction is complete, stabilize the entire tributary area to the dry well before allowing stormwater runoff to enter it. · An observation well must be installed to check water levels, retention time, and evidence of clogging. · Accessibility for maintenance during dry and wet weather conditions must be provided. Design Specifications The following sections provide design specifications for dry wells. Geotechnical Due to the potential to contaminate groundwater, cause slope instability, impact surrounding structures, and potential for insufficient infiltration capacity, an extensive geotechnical site investigation must be conducted during the site planning process to verify site suitability for a dry well. All geotechnical investigations must be performed according to the most recent GMED Policy GS 200.1. Soil infiltration rates and the groundwater table depth must be evaluated to ensure that conditions are satisfactory for proper operation of a dry well. The project applicant must demonstrate through infiltration testing, soil logs, and the written opinion of a licensed civil engineer that sufficiently permeable soils exist on-site to allow the construction of a properly functioning dry well. Dry wells are appropriate for soils with a minimum corrected in-situ infiltration rate of 0.3 in/hr. The geotechnical report must determine if the proposed project site is suitable for a dry well and must recommend a design infiltration rate (see “Design Infiltration Rate” under the “Sizing” section). The geotechnical investigation should be such that a good understanding is gained as to how the stormwater runoff will move through the soil (horizontally or vertically) and if there are any geological conditions that could inhibit the movement of water. Pretreatment Pretreatment is important for all structural stormwater quality control measures, but it is particularly important for retention facilities. Pretreatment refers to design features that provide settling of large particles before stormwater runoff enters a stormwater quality control measure in order to reduce the long-term maintenance burden. Pretreatment should be provided to reduce the sediment load entering a dry well in order to maintain the infiltration rate of the dry well. To ensure that dry wells are effective, the project applicant must incorporate pretreatment devices that provide sediment reduction (e.g., RET-4: Dry Well County of Los Angeles E-36 February 2014 vegetated swales, vegetated filter strips, sedimentation manholes, and proprietary devices). Setbacks Dry wells must be sited following the setbacks from the most recent GMED Policy GS 200.1. Geometry · Dry well configurations vary, but generally have length and width top dimensions close to a square. Prefabricated dry wells are often circular. · The filter bed media layers must have the following composition and thickness, unless they are prefabricated dry wells: o Top layer: 2 inches of pea gravel o Middle layer: 3 to 5 feet of washed 2- to 6-inch gravel; void spaces should be approximately 30 to 40 percent o Bottom layer: 6 inches of sand or geomembrane liner equivalent. · Gravel media and prefabricated dry wells have porosities of 30 to 40 percent and 80 to 95 percent, respectively. · If a dry well receives stormwater runoff from an underground pipe (i.e., stormwater runoff does not enter the top of the dry well from the ground surface), a fine mesh screen should be installed at the inlet. The inlet elevation should be 18 inches below the ground surface (i.e., below 12 inches of surface soil and 6 inches of dry well media). Sizing Dry wells are sized using a simple sizing method where the SWQDv must be completely infiltrated within 96 hours. Dry wells provide stormwater runoff storage in the voids of the rock fill. Step 1: Determine the SWQDv Dry wells must be designed to capture and retain the SWQDv (see Section 6 for SWQDv calculation procedures). Step 2: Determine the design infiltration rate Determine the corrected in-situ infiltration rate (fdesign) of the native soil using the procedures described in the most recent GMED Policy GS 200.1. RET-4: Dry Well County of Los Angeles E-37 February 2014 Step 3: Calculate the surface area Determine the required size of the infiltration surface by assuming the SWQDv will fill the available void spaces of the gravel storage layer. The maximum depth of stormwater runoff that can be infiltrated within the maximum retention time (96 hrs) is calculated using the following equation: =12 × Where: dmax = Maximum depth of water that can be infiltrated within the required drawdown time [ft]; fdesign = Design infiltration rate [in/hr]; and t = Maximum retention time (max 96 hrs) [hr]. Select the dry well depth (dt) such that: ≤ Where: dt = Depth of dry well fill [ft]; dmax = Maximum depth of water that can be infiltrated within the maximum retention time [ft]; and nt = Dry well fill porosity. Calculate the infiltrating surface area (bottom of the dry well) required: =× Where: A = Surface area of the bottom of the dry well [ft2]; SWQDv = Stormwater quality design volume [ft3]; and dt = Depth of dry well fill [ft]; and nt = Dry well fill porosity. Flow Entrance and Energy Dissipation Energy dissipation controls, constructed of sound materials such as stones, concrete, or proprietary devices that are rated to withstand the energy of the influent flow, must be installed at the inlet to the dry well. Consult with LACDPW for the type and design of energy dissipation structure. RET-4: Dry Well County of Los Angeles E-38 February 2014 Drainage The specifications for designing drainage systems for dry wells are presented below: · The bottom of dry well must be native soil that is over-excavated at least one foot in depth with the soil replaced uniformly without compaction. Amending the excavated soil with two to four inches (~15 to 30 percent) of coarse sand is recommended. · The use of vertical piping, either for distribution or infiltration enhancement, is prohibited. This application may be classified as a Class V Injection Well per 40 CFR Part 146.5(e)(4). · The infiltration capacity of the subsurface layers should be sufficient to ensure a maximum retention time of 96 hours. An observation well must be installed to allow observation of retention time. Hydraulic Restriction Layer The entire infiltrative area, including the side walls must lined with a geomembrane liner to prevent soil from migrating into the top layer and reducing storage capacity. The specifications of the geomembrane liner are presented in Table E-7. The entire well area, including the sides, must be lined with a geomembrane liner prior to placing the media bed. Provide generous overlap at the seams. Table E-7. Geomembrane Liner Specifications for Dry Wells Parameter Test Method Specifications Material Nonwoven geomembrane liner Unit weight 8 oz/yd3 (minimum) Filtration rate 0.08 in/sec (minimum) Puncture strength ASTM D-751 (Modified) 125 lbs (minimum) Mullen burst strength ASTM D-751 400 lb/in2 (minimum) Tensile strength AST D-1682 300 lbs (minimum) Equiv. opening size US Standard Sieve No. 80 (minimum) Observation Well The observation well is a vertical section of perforated PVC pipe, four- to six-inch diameter, installed flush with the top of the dry well on a footplate and with a locking, removable cap. The observation well is needed to monitor the infiltration rate in dry well and is useful for marking the location of the dry well. Vegetation · Dry wells must be kept free of vegetation. RET-4: Dry Well County of Los Angeles E-39 February 2014 · Trees and other large vegetation should be planted away from dry well such that drip lines do not overhang the infiltration area. Restricted Construction Materials Use of pressure-treated wood or galvanized metal at or around a dry well is prohibited. Maintenance Access The dry well must be safely accessible during wet and dry weather conditions if it is publicly-maintained. If the dry well becomes plugged and fails, access is needed to excavate the dry well and replace the filter bed media. To prevent damage and compaction, access must able to accommodate a backhoe working at “arm’s length” from the dry well. Maintenance Requirements Maintenance and regular inspections are important for proper function of dry wells. The following are general maintenance requirements: · Conduct regular inspection and routine maintenance for pretreatment devices. · Inspect dry well and its observation well frequently to ensure that water infiltrates into the subsurface completely within maximum retention time of 96 hours. If water is present in the observation well more than 96 hours after a major storm, the dry well may be clogged. Maintenance activities triggered by a potentially clogged facility include: o Check for debris/sediment accumulation and remove sediment (if any) and evaluate potential sources of sediment and vegetative or other debris (e.g., embankment erosion, channel scour, overhanging trees, etc). If suspected upstream sources are outside of the County's jurisdiction, additional pretreatment operations (e.g., trash racks, vegetated swales, etc.) may be necessary. o Assess the condition of the top aggregate layer for sediment buildup and crusting. Remove the top layer of pea gravel and replace. If slow draining conditions persist, the entire dry well may need to be excavated and replaced. · Eliminate standing water to prevent vector breeding. · Remove and dispose of trash and debris as needed, but at least prior to the beginning of the wet season. A summary of potential problems that may need to be addressed by maintenance activities is presented in Table E-8. The County requires execution of a maintenance agreement to be recorded by the property owner for the on-going maintenance of any privately-maintained stormwater RET-4: Dry Well County of Los Angeles E-40 February 2014 quality control measures. The property owner is responsible for compliance with the maintenance agreement. A sample maintenance agreement is presented in Appendix H. Table E-8. Dry Well Troubleshooting Summary Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Maintenance Required Trash and Debris Trash and debris > 5 ft3/1,000 ft2 Remove and dispose of trash and debris. Contaminants and Pollution Any evidence of oil, gasoline, contaminants, or other pollutants Remove any evidence of visual contamination. Erosion/Sediment Accumulation Undercut or eroded areas at inlet structures Repair eroded areas and re- grade if necessary. Accumulation of sediment, debris, and oil/grease in pretreatment devices Remove sediment, debris, and/or oil/grease. Accumulation of sediment, debris, and oil/grease on surface or inlet Remove sediment, debris, and/or oil/grease. Water Drainage Rate Standing water, or by inspection of observation wells Remove the top layer of the dry well bottom and replace if necessary. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Appendix C: Drywell System Information and Sizing VTTM No. 83705 Drywell Calculations CVC Job No. BORS-003 02/15/2022 Page 1 of 2 VTTM No. 83705 8601 Mission Drive, Rosemead, CA Drywell Calculations  Infiltration Rate was determined by project’s geotechnical engineer. The Site is located within Soil Type 6 per LA County Hydrology Maps. The average measured Infiltration Rate of site soils was calculated as 17.0-inches per hour per the Geotechnical Investigation Results prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc. A factor of safety of 2 was applied to the assumed measured rate for a design infiltration rate (KDESIGN) = 8.5 in/hr  All Drywell Systems have been located at least 10’ from building foundations.  The volume statically held within the drywell system includes the volume held by the gravel drywell (void ratio = 0.35) and the volume held by the 10’ sumps below the inlet pipes to the Primary Chamber and the Settling Chamber. Upstream Detention Pipe storage will be provided for the required amount of volume not statically held within each drywell system. Refer to the drywell details on the following pages for more information.  Historic high depth of groundwater is 60’ below existing ground surface. However, per nearby groundwater wells indicate that groundwater is at a depth of 231’ below ground surface. Groundwater was not encountered at a depth of 51.5’ below ground surface during the Geotechnical Investigation conducted by Albus & Associates, Inc.  48-hour Drawdown timeframe utilized DMA A1 A = 3.38 ac DCV = 8,630 cf Maxwell Plus Drywell System with the following properties:  25’ depth* Primary Chamber at 4’ diameter (10’ static storage depth)  25’ depth* Settling Chamber at 4’ diameter (10’ static storage depth)  20’ Drywell at 6’ diameter  Inlet pipe at invert 15’ below FS  ddrywell infiltration= (dsettling-dslurry) + ddrywell = (25’ – 13’) + (20’) = 32’  Total Depth (overall depth) = dsettling + ddrywell = 25’ + 20’ = 45’ Storage Calculations VSETTLING *= πr²(dstatic settling) = π(2 ft)²(10 ft) = 126 cf VPRIMARY *= πr²(dstatic primary) = π(2 ft))²(10 ft) = 126 cf VDRYWELL = πr²(ddrywell infiltration)(n) = π(3 ft)²(25 ft)(0.35) = 198 cf where, r = radius (ft), d = depth (ft), n = Void Space (0.35) per manufacturer’s specifications ∑Volume = 126 cf + 126 cf + 198 cf = 449 cf *Only the portion below the inlet pipe for the Primary Chamber and the Settling Chamber was included for static storage calculation of drywell system. Required Detention Vault Storage = DCV - ∑V = 8,630 cf – 449 cf = 8,180 cf Provided  8’x8’x10’ BioClean Urbanpond Detention System Storage Per Module = 596 cf / module Modules provided = 14 modules VTTM No. 83705 Drywell Calculations CVC Job No. BORS-003 02/15/2022 Page 2 of 2 V = (596 cf / module)*(14 modules) = 8,344 cf > 8,180 cf  Infiltration Calculations V48-HR = (1 ft/ 12 in)(KDESIGN, in/hr)(SA, sf)(48 hr), where SA = Infiltrating Surface Area of Drywell SA = πr² + 2π(r)(ddrywell infiltration) = π(3 ft)² + 2(π)(3 ft)(32 ft) = 631.5 sf where, r = radius (ft), ddrywell infiltration = depth of drywell infiltration zone (ft) V48-HR = (1 ft/12 in)(8.5 in/hr)(631.5 sf)(48 hr) = 21,469 cf > DCV = 8,630 cf  TheMaxWell®Plus,asmanufacturedandinstalledexclusivelyby TorrentResources Incorporated, is the industry standard for draining large paved surfaces,nuisancewaterandotherdemandingapplications.This patentedsystemincorporatesstate-of-the-artpre-treatmenttechnology. THEULTIMATEINDESIGN Since 1974, nearly 65,000 MaxWell®Systems have proven their value as a cost-effective solution in a wide variety of drainage applications. They are acceptedbystateandmunicipalagenciesandareastandarddetailinnumerous drainagemanuals.Manymunicipalitieshaverecognizedtheinherentbenefits oftheMaxWellPlusandnowrequireitfordrainageofallpavedsurfaces. SUPERIORPRE-TREATMENT Industryresearch,togetherwithTorrentResources’ownexperience,haveshown thatinitialstormdrainageflowshavethegreatestimpactonsystemperformance. This“firstflush”occursduringthefirstfewminutesofrunoff,andcarriesthe majority of sediment and debris. Larger paved surfaces or connecting pipes from catch basins, underground storage, etc. can also generate high peak flows which may strain system function. In addition, nuisance water flows requirecontrolledprocessingseparatefromnormalstormrunoffdemands. Inthe MaxWell®Plus,preliminary treatment is provided through collectionandseparationindeeplarge-volumesettlingchambers.Thestandard MaxWellPlusSystemhasover2,500gallonsofcapacitytocontainsedimentand debriscarriedbyincomingwater.Floatingtrash,paper,pavementoil,etc.are effectivelystoppedbythe PureFlo®DebrisShieldsineachchamber.Theseshield- ingdevicesareequippedwithaneffectivescreentofiltersuspendedmaterialand areventedtopreventsiphoningoffloatingsurfacedebrisasthesystemdrains. EFFECTIVEPROCESSING Incomingwaterfromthesurfacegratedinletsorconnectingpipesisreceived in the Primary Settling Chamber where silt and other heavy particles settle to thebottom.APureFloDebrisShieldensurescontainmentbytrappingfloating debrisandpavementoil.Thepre-treatedflowisthenregulatedtoadesignrate ofupto0.25cfsanddirectedtoaSecondarySettlingChamber.Thesettlingand containment process is repeated, thereby effectively achieving controlled, uniformtreatment.ThesystemisdrainedaswaterrisesunderthePureFloDebris Shieldandspillsintothetopoftheoverflowpipe.Thedrainageassemblyreturns thecleanedwaterintothesurroundingsoilthroughtheFloFast®DrainageScreen. ABSORBENTTECHNOLOGY BothMaxWellPlussettlingchambersareequippedwithabsorbentspongesto providepromptremovalofpavementoils.Thesefloatingpillow-likedevicesare 100%waterrepellentandliterallywickpetrochemicalcompoundsfromthewater. Each sponge has a capacity of up to 128 ounces to accommodate effective, long-termtreatment.Theabsorbentiscompletelyinertandwillsafelyremove runoffconstituentsdowntorainbowsheensthataretypicallynomorethanone moleculethick. SECURITYFEATURES MaxWellPlusSystemsincludebolted,theft-deterrent,castirongratingsand covers as standard security features. Special inset castings which are resistant tolooseningfromaccidentalimpactareavailableforuseinlandscaped applica- tions. Machined mating surfaces and “Storm Water Only” wording are standard. ManufacturedandInstalledExclusivelybyTorrentResourcesIncorporated Pleaseseereversesideforadditionalinformation U.S.PatentNo.4,923,330 ® INDUSTRYSERVICES Site Drainage Systems Stormwater Drywells French Drains Piping Drainage Appurtenances Pump Systems Technical Analysis Design Review Percolation Testing Geologic Database ADEQ Drywell Registration Recharge Systems Municipal/Private Recharge Wells Injection Wells & Galleries Environmental Applications Pattern Drilling/Soil Remediation Drainage Rehabilitation Drywell Abandonments OSHA HAZMAT-Certified Drainage Renovation Problem Assessment Site Redesign/Modification System Retrofit Drainage Maintenance Preventive Maintenance Service Contracts Drywell Cleaning TORRENTRESOURCESINCORPORATED 1509 East Elwood Street Phoenix Arizona 85040~1391 phone 602~268~0785 fax 602~268~0820 Nevada 702~366~1234 AZ Lic.ROC070465 A, ROC047067 B-4; ADWR 363 CA Lic.528080 A, C-42, HAZ NV Lic.0035350 A NM Lic.90504 GF04 Thewatermarkfordrainagesolutions.® THEMAXWELLFIVE-YEARWARRANTY Innovative engineering, quality materials and exacting construction are standard with every MaxWell System designed,manufactured and installed by Torrent ResourcesIncorporated. TheMaxWell Drainage SystemsWarrantyisthebest in the industry and guarantees against failures due to workmanship or materials for a period of five years fromdateofcompletion. 1/12 MaxWell®Plus DRAINAGE SYSTEM Product Information and Design Features TORRENTRESOURCES(CA)INCORPORATED phone 661~947~9836 CA Lic.886759 A, C-42 www.TorrentResources.com AnevolutionofMcGuckinDrilling 114188b:0084318b2 1/11/12 1:25 PM Page 1 Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Appendix D: “NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO OCEAN” Stencil Examples Sample Stencil 1 Sample Stencil 2 Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Appendix E: Catch Basin Cleaning GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE OF FLO-GARDTM+PLUS CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTERS SCOPE: Federal, State and Local Clean Water Act regulations and those of insurance carriers require that stormwater filtration systems be maintained and serviced on a recurring basis. The intent of the regulations is to ensure that the systems, on a continuing basis, efficiently remove pollutants from stormwater runoff thereby preventing pollution of the nation’s water resources. These Specifications apply to the Flo-GardTM +Plus Catch Basin Insert Filter. RECOMMENDED FREQUENCY OF SERVICE: Drainage Protection Systems (DPS) recommends that installed Flo-GardTM +Plus Catch Basin Insert Filters be serviced on a recurring basis. Ultimately, the frequency depends on the amount of runoff, pollutant loading and interference from debris (leaves, vegetation, cans, paper, etc.); however, it is recommended that each installation be serviced a minimum of three times per year, with a change of filter medium once per year. DPS technicians are available to do an on-site evaluation, upon request. RECOMMENDED TIMING OF SERVICE: DPS guidelines for the timing of service are as follows: 1. For areas with a definite rainy season: Prior to, during and following the rainy season. 2. For areas subject to year-round rainfall: On a recurring basis (at least three times per year). 3. For areas with winter snow and summer rain: Prior to and just after the snow season and during the summer rain season. 4. For installed devices not subject to the elements (washracks, parking garages, etc.): On a recurring basis (no less than three times per year). SERVICE PROCEDURES: 1. The service shall commence with collection and removal of sediment and debris (litter, leaves, papers, cans, etc.) and broom sweeping around the drainage inlet. Accumulated materials shall be placed in a DOT approved container for later disposal. 2. The catch basin shall be visually inspected for defects and possible illegal dumping. If illegal dumping has occurred, the proper authorities and property owner representative shall be notified as soon as practicable. 3. The catch basin grate shall be removed and set to one side. Using an industrial vacuum, the collected materials shall be removed from the liner. (Note: DPS uses a truck-mounted vacuum for servicing Flo-Gard TM +Plus catch basin inserts.) 4. When all of the collected materials have been removed, the filter medium pouches shall be removed by unsnapping the tether from the D-ring and set to one side. The filter liner, gaskets, stainless steel frame and mounting brackets, etc. shall be inspected for continued serviceability. Minor damage or defects found shall be corrected on-the-spot and a notation made on the Maintenance Record. More extensive deficiencies that affect the efficiency of the filter (torn liner, etc.), if approved by the customer representative, will be corrected and an invoice submitted to the representative along with the Maintenance Record. 5. The filter medium pouches shall be inspected for defects and continued serviceability and replaced as necessary and the pouch tethers re-attached to the liner’s D-ring. See below. 6. The grate shall be replaced. EXCHANGE AND DISPOSAL OF EXPOSED FILTER MEDIUM AND COLLECTED DEBRIS The frequency of filter medium pouch exchange will be in accordance with the existing DPS-Customer Maintenance Contract. DPS recommends that the medium be changed at least once per year. During the appropriate service, or if so determined by the service technician during a non-scheduled service, the filter medium pouches will be replaced with new pouches and the exposed pouches placed in the DOT approved container, along with the exposed debris. Once the exposed pouches and debris have been placed in the container, DPS has possession and must dispose of it in accordance with local, state and federal agency requirements. Note: As the generator, the landowner is ultimately responsible for the proper disposal of the exposed filter medium and debris. Because the materials likely contain petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals and other harmful pollutants, the materials must be treated as an EPA Class 2 Hazardous Waste and properly disposed of. DPS relieves the landowner of the actual disposal task, and provides certification of its completion in accordance with appropriate regulations. DPS also has the capability of servicing all manner of catch basin inserts and catch basins without inserts, underground oil/water separators, stormwater interceptors and other such devices. All DPS personnel are highly qualified technicians and are confined space trained and certified. Call us at (888) 950-8826 for further information and assistance. 05/04/04 Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Appendix F: General Education Materials Wipe pots, pans, and work areas prior to washing. Do not pour cooking residue directly into the drain. Do not pour waste oil directly into the drain, parking lot or street. Do not wash floor mats outside where water will run off directly into the storm drain. Do not rinse spills into the street. 1 2 2 3 3 4 41Dispose of food waste directly into the trash. Avoid using the garbage disposal. Place greasy food in the trash. Clean mats inside over a utility sink. Use dry clean up for spills. Collect waste oil and store for recycling. THE RIGHT WAY THE WRONG WAY Good Cleaning Practices Managing FATS,OIL and GREASE POST IN CLEANUP/WORK AREA www.lacsd.org PUBLIC WORKS County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works For more information call (888) CLEAN LA or visit www.888CleanLA.com Are You a Litter B u g A r e Y o u a L i t t e r B u g and a n d DoDo n’t Know It?t K n o w I t ? Take our quiz! Have you ever... • Dropped a cigarette butt or trash on the grou n d ? • Failed to pick up after your dog while out on a w a l k ? • Overwatered your lawn after ap p l y i ng fertilizers/pesticides? • Disposed of used motor oil in the s t r e e t , gutter or garbage? If you answered yes to any of these action s , t h e n YOU ARE A LITTER BUG! Each of these behaviors contribute to stor m w a t e r pollution, which contaminates o u r o c e a n a n d waterways, kills marine life and causes beach c l o s u r e s . You can become part of the solution! To find out how, flip this card over. For more information, c a l l o r v i s i t : Follow these simple steps to prevent stormwater pollution • Put your garbage wh e r e i t b e l o n g s — i n t h e t r ash can. • Pick up after your dog w h e n out on a walk. • Reduce pesticide and f e r t i l i z e r u s e ; d o n ’ t o v e r w a t e r after application or apply if rain is f o r e c a s t . • Dispose of used motor oil at an oil r e c y c l i n g c e n t e r or at a free Househo l d H a z a r d o u s W aste/E-Waste collection event. A message from the Cou n t y o f Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Printed on recycled paper. Follow these simple step s t o F ol lo w t h es e s i m p l e s t e p s t o prevent stormwater po l l u t i o n : pre v e n t s to rmw a te r p ol lu t i on: DoDon’t Paint the’t Paint the Town Red!Town Red! Storm drains are for rain… they’re not for paint disposal. More than 197,000 times each month, L.A. County residents wash their dirty paint brushes under an outdoor faucet. This dirty rinse water flows into the street, down the storm drain and straight to the ocean — untreated. Remember to clean water-based paint brushes in the sink, rinse oil-based paint brushes with paint thinner, and take old paint and paint-related products to a Household Hazardous Waste/E-Waste collection event. Tips for Paint Clean-Up: L.A. County residents c a n h e l p s o l v e t h e s t o r m w a t e r pollution problem by t a k i n g t h e s e e a s y s t e p s w h e n working with paint an d p a i n t - r e l a t e d p r o d u c t s … • Never dispose of paint or paint-relat e d p r o d u c t s i n t h e gutters or storm drains. This is called illegal dumping. Take them to a House h o l d H a z a r d o u s W a s t e / E - W a s t e collection event. Ca l l 1 ( 8 8 8 ) C L E A N L A o r visit www.888CleanLA.com t o l o c a t e a n e v e n t n e a r y o u . • Buy only what you need. Reuse leftover paint for touch-ups or donate i t t o a l o c a l g r a f f i t i a b a t e m e n t program. Recycle or u s e e x c e s s p a i n t . • Clean water-based pa i n t b r u s h es in the sink. • Oil-based paints shou l d b e c l e a n e d w i t h p a i n t t h inner. Filter and reuse paint t h i n n e r . S e t t h e u s e d t h i n n e r aside in a closed jar t o s e t t l e - o u t p a i n t p a r t i c l e s . • Store paints and pain t - r e l a t e d p r o d u c t s i n r i g i d , durable and watertight co n t a i n e r s w i t h tight-fitting covers. A message from the Cou n t y o f L o s A n g e l e s D e p a r t m e n t o f Public Works. Printed on recycled paper. Storm drains are for rain… they’re not pooper scoopers. L.A. County residents walk a dog without picking up the droppings more than 62,000 times per month. Disease-causing dog waste washes from the ground and streets into storm drains and flows straight to the ocean — untreated. Remember to bring a bag and clean up after your dog. PP ickick UpUp AfterAfter YourYour Pooch!Pooch! Dog owners can help so l v e t h e s t o r m w a t e r p o l l u t i o n problem by taking thes e e a s y s t e p s … • Clean up after your d o g e v e r y s i n gle time. • Take advantage of the complimentary waste bags offered in dispensers at local parks. • Ensure you always have extra bags in your car so you are prepared when you travel with your do g. • Carry extra bags when walking your dog and make them available to other p e t o w n e r s w h o a r e w i t h o u t . • Teach children how t o p r o p e r l y c l e a n u p a f ter a pet. Encourage them to throw t h e u s e d b a g s i n t h e nearest trash receptacl e i f t h e y a re away from home. • Put a friendly message on the bulletin board at the local dog park to r e m i n d p et owners to clean up after their dogs. • Te ll friends and neighbors abo u t t h e i ll effects of animal waste on the environment. E n c o u r a g e them to clean up after t h e i r p e t s a s w e l l . Tips for Dog Owners: SwimmingPool Tips•Make sure allchemicals aredissipated beforedraining a pool orspa •Do not drain poolswithin 5 days ofadding chemicals•Never backwash afilter into the streetor stormdrain •Cleanup chemicalspills withabsorbent, don’twash it down thedrain•Dispose of leftoverchemicals and paintsthrough a licensedhazardous wastedisposal providerFollow these simple steps toprevent stormwater pollution…Stormdrainstake runoffdirectly to creeksand the ocean without treatment.Pool chemicals can harm ournatural creeks and waterways.Anything going into ourstormdrains that isn’trainwater contributes tostormwater pollution, whichcontaminates our creeks andocean, kills marine life andcauses beach closures....not pool chemicalsStorm Drains arefor Rain...SwimmingPool Tips •Make sure all chemicals are dissipated beforedraining a pool or spa •Do not drain poolswithin 5 days of adding chemicals •Never backwash afilter into the street or stormdrain •Cleanup chemical spills with absorbent, don’twash it down the drain •Dispose of leftoverchemicals and paints through a licensedhazardous waste disposal provider Follow these simple steps to prevent stormwater pollution… Printed on recycled paper Stormdrainstake runoffdirectly to the ocean without treatment. Pool chemicalscan harm our natural creeks and waterways. Anythinggoing into our stormdrains that isn’t rainwatercontributes to stormwater pollution, which contaminates our creeks and ocean, killsmarine life and causes beach closures. ...not pool chemicals Storm Drains arefor Rain... AA YardYard is ais a Terrible Terrible ThingThing toto Waste!Waste! Storm drains are for rain…not yard waste. Residential yard waste represents about 13 percent of the total waste generated in L.A. County. Pesticides, fertilizer and yard waste such as leaves and mowed grass wash from the ground and streets into storm drains and flow straight to the ocean — untreated. Remember to use pesticides and fertilizer wisely and pick-up yard waste. Tips For Yard Care: L.A. County residents c a n h e l p solve the stormwater pollution problem by tak i n g t h e s e e a s y s t e p s … • Do not over-fertilize and do not use fertilizer or p e s ticides near ditches, gutters or storm drains. • Do not use fertilizer or pesticides before a rain. • Follow the directions on the label carefully. • Use pesticides sparingly — more is not better. “Spot” apply, rather tha n “ b l a n k e t ” a p ply. • When watering your lawn, use the least amount of water possible so it do e s n ’ t r u n i n t o t h e s t r e e t c a r r y i n g pesticides and other chemicals with it. • Use non-toxic products for your garden and l awn whenever possible. • If you must store pesticides or fertilizer, make sur e they are in a sealed, w a t e r - p r o o f c o n t a i n e r i n a covered area to prevent ru n o ff. • Do not blow, sweep, hose o r r a k e l e a v e s o r o t h e r yard trimmings into the street, gutter o r s t o r m d r a i n . A message from the Cou n t y o f L o s A n g e l e s D e p a r t m e n t o f Public Works. Printed on recycled paper. Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Appendix G: Operation and Maintenance Plan To be provided during Final Engineering Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan 8601 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Appendix H: Geotechnical Report 1011 N. Armando Street, Anaheim, CA 92806-2606 (714) 630-1626 October, 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Mr. Erik Pfahler Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Residential Development, 8601 Mission Drive, Rosemead, California Dear Mr. Pfahler, Albus & Associates, Inc. has completed a geotechnical investigation of the site for evaluation of the percolation characteristics of the site soils. The scope of this investigation consisted of the following: Exploratory drilling, soil sampling and test well installation Field percolation testing Laboratory testing of selected soil samples Engineering analysis of the data Preparation of this report SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Location and Description The site is located at 8601 Mission Drive within the city of Rosemead, California. The APN parcel numbers for the current development are 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. The property is bordered by Mission Drive to the south, Walnut Grove Avenue, an existing easement for power lines, and a nursery to the west, and single-family residences to the north and east. The location of the site and its relationship to the surrounding areas are shown in Figure 1, Site Location Map. The site consists of an irregularly-shaped property containing approximately 3.35 acres of land. The site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 357 to 363 feet above mean sea level (based on Google Earth) and slopes gently down to the south. The site is currently vacant land with some improvements onsite. The perimeters of the site are bounded by chain-link fencing, masonry block walls, and plastic fencing. A short concrete driveway is located to the south and west. Along the southwest boundary of the property is existing overhead powerlines. Vegetation within the site consists of minor ground cover and some large palm trees within the southwest portion of the site. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 2 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. © 2021 Google N FIGURE 1-SITE LOCATION MAP Proposed Residential Development 8601 Mission Drive, Rosemead, California NOT TO SCALE Proposed Development Based on our understanding, site development is anticipated to consist of multi-story (2 to 3), wood- framed buildings at grade. Associated interior driveways, decorative hardscape, parking areas and underground utilities are also anticipated. No grading or structural plans were available in preparing this proposal. However, we anticipate some minor cut and filling of the site will be required to achieve future surface configuration and we expect future foundation loads will be moderate. SITE Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 3 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. SUMMARY OF FIELD AND LABORATORY WORK Subsurface Investigation Subsurface exploration for this investigation was conducted on September 7, 2021, and consisted of drilling six (6) soil borings to depths ranging from approximately 11.5 to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted, continuous flight, hollow- stem-auger drill rig. A representative of Albus & Associates, Inc. logged the exploratory borings. Visual and tactile identifications were made of the materials encountered, and their descriptions are presented in the Exploration Logs in Appendix A. The approximate locations of the exploratory excavations completed by this firm are shown on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Bulk, relatively undisturbed and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samples were obtained at selected depths within the exploratory borings for subsequent laboratory testing. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained using a 3-inch O.D., 2.5-inch I.D., California split-spoon soil sampler lined with brass rings. SPT samples were obtained from the boring using a standard, unlined SPT soil sampler. During each sampling interval, the sampler was driven 18 inches with successive drops of a 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler was recorded for each six inches of advancement. The total blow count for the lower 12 inches of advancement per soil sample is recorded on the exploration log. Samples were placed in sealed containers or plastic bags and transported to our laboratory for analyses. The borings were backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion of sampling. Two additional borings (P-1 and P-2) were drilled adjacent to boring B-1 for percolation testing. Upon completion of drilling, well materials were installed within P-1 and P-2 for subsequent percolation testing. Construction details for P-1 and P-2 consisted of 15 and 30 feet of well materials. The bottom 5 feet for both wells utilized perforated 3-inch-diameter pipe with the remaining well utilizing solid 3-inch-diameter pipe to ground surface. The joints between pipes were reinforced with duct tape and the sections of perforated pipe were covered with filter sock. After installation of pipe, ¾” gravel was used to fill the annular space around the perforated sections. Upon completion of testing, all well materials were removed from the borings and then backfilled with soil cuttings. Percolation Testing Percolation testing was performed on September 7, 2021, in general conformance with the constant- head test procedures outlined in the referenced Well Permeameter Method (USBR 7300-89). A water hose attached to a water source on site was connected to an inline flowmeter to measure the water flow. The flowmeter is capable of measuring flow rates up to 10 gallons per minute and as low as 0.06 gallons per minute. A valve was connected in line with the flowmeter to control the flow rate. A filling hose was used to connect the flowmeter and the test wells. Water was introduced by the filling hose near the bottom of the test wells. A water level meter with 1/100-foot divisions was used to measure the depths to water surface from the top of well casings. Flow to the wells was terminated upon either completion of testing of all the pre-determined water levels or the flow rate exceeded the maximum capacity of the flowmeter. Measurements obtained during the percolation testing are provided in Appendix C on Plates C-1 and C-2. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 4 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Laboratory Testing Selected soil samples of representative earth materials were tested to assist in the formulation of conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. Tests consisted of in-situ moisture contents and dry densities, 200 washes and sieve analyses. Results of laboratory testing relevant to percolation characteristics are presented in Appendix B and on the Exploration Logs in Appendix A. ANALYSIS OF DATA Subsurface Conditions Review of the Diblee Map for the El Monte and Baldwin Park Quadrangles shows the site is designated as Quaternary Alluvium and falls within a flood plain and would have been subjected to seasonally- deposited materials associated with heavy rains from nearby mountain ranges to the north. Our exploration encountered artificial fills overlaying alluvial soils. Descriptions of the earth materials encountered during our investigation are summarized below and are presented in detail on the Exploration Logs presented in Appendix A. Fills up to about 2 feet thick appear to be present on site due to previous site improvements and grading. Fill materials typically consisted of fine to medium-grained silty sands. Alluvium was encountered underlying the artificial fill and generally consisted of interlayered silty sands, sands with silt, gravelly sands, and clayey sands. These materials were typically medium dense to very dense and damp. Alluvial soils were encountered to the maximum depth explored (51.5 feet). Within borings B-2 and B-3, cobbles were encountered at depths of approximately 10 feet. Due to the size of the cobbles, the hollow stem could not extract all the cobbles. As such, the cobbles generally remained within the borings and floated within the cuttings and around the stem. Sizes were either measured or visually observed within the boring shaft and are estimated to be 4 to 6 inches in diameter. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during this firm’s subsurface exploration to a depth of 51.5 feet. The CDMG Special Report 024 suggests that historic high groundwater for the subject site is approximately 60 feet. However, review of the Los Angeles County groundwater level data for the nearby well 2920G indicates that groundwater for the area is 231 feet below ground surface as of 2018. Well readings have been recorded from 5/1/1949 to 4/26/2018, and during this period, groundwater has fluctuated, but has continued to increase in depth from 126 feet (bgs) to 231 feet (bgs) during this time period. The last recorded reading at the time of this report was April 26, 2018 and indicated a depth of 231 feet. Percolation Data Analyses were performed to evaluate permeability using the flow rate obtained at the end of the constant-head stage of field percolation testing. These analyses were performed in accordance with the procedures provided in the referenced USBR 7300-89. The procedure essentially uses a closed- form solution to the percolation out of a small-diameter well. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 5 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Using the USBR method, we calculated a composite permeability value for the head conditions maintained in the wells. The results are summarized in Table 1 below and the supporting analyses are included in Appendix C, Plates C-3 and C-4. Comparing the results of grain-size testing confirms the field test results are appropriate for the soils tested. TABLE 1 Summary of Back-Calculated Permeability Coefficient Test Well Total Depth of Well (ft) Depth to Water in Well (ft) Height of Water in Well (ft) Static Flow Rate (gal./min.) Estimated Permeability, ks (in/hr.) P-1 14.7 12 2.7 4.7 18.34 P-2 30 27 3 0.68 2.26 Design of Dry Well The infiltration rate in a dry well is dependent upon several factors including the soil permeabilities of the various soil layers throughout the soil mass, hydraulic gradient of water pressure head in the soil mass, and depth to groundwater. The infiltration rate is related to the permeability by Darcy’s equation: V  ki Where: V= water velocity (infiltration rate) k= permeability i=hydraulic gradient The presence of differing soil layers with differing permeabilities, the variable head condition in the well shaft, and presence of ground water are factors that make determining the effective infiltration rate of a dry well somewhat complicated. We have performed the Well Permeameter tests in accordance with the test method. This test provides a means to estimate the Permeability Rate of the soils influencing the dry well, not the infiltration rate. Therefore, the effective infiltration rate must be determined using the relationship between permeability and infiltration rate as expressed by Darcy’s equation. Solution of the Darcy equation essentially requires solving a differential mass balance equation. Due to these complications, the infiltration characteristics of the proposed dry well were modeled using a computer program. Infiltration in a dry well was modeled using the software Seep/W, version 2007, by Geo-Slope International. The program allows for modeling of both partially-saturated and saturated porous medium using a finite element approach to solve Darcy’s Law. The program can evaluate both steady- state and transient flow in planar and axisymmetric cases. Boundaries of the model can be identified with various conditions including fix total head, fix pressure head, fix flow rate, and head as a function Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 6 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. of flow. Soil permeability properties can be modeled with either Fredlund et al (1994), Green and Corey (1971), Van Genuchten (1980), or Saxton et al. (1986). Only saturated permeabilities were used in our analyses. A Seep/W model was setup with the bottom of the dry well at a depth of 40 feet below ground surface. The dry well was assumed to consist of a shaft that is 6 feet in diameter and contains a settling chamber having an inside diameter of 4 feet, outside diameter of 4.5 feet, and length of 18 feet. The annular space around the chamber between the depths of 0 and 13 feet was assumed to consist of a cement slurry. A more detailed model of the dry well design can be found on Plate 2. The model consisted of three zones of material to represent the general soil profile. The saturated permeability of material 1 was modeled to be impermeable and represent the future artificial fills. The saturated permeability of the primary infiltration zones, materials 2 and 3, were selected based on the coefficient of permeability estimated from percolation tests as well as laboratory gradation test results. The saturated permeability of material 4 was modeled to represent the clayey sand materials encountered at depth. The permeability values are summarized in Table 2. TABLE 2 Summary of Permeability Values Depth (ft) Material No. Material Type Sat. Perm., Ks (in/hr) 0-5 1 Fill 0.001 5-15 2 SW 15 15-45 3 SP/SM 2 >45 4 SC 0.01 Water in the well was assumed to be at a depth of 7 feet below the ground surface so a fix-head boundary was set with a total head elevation of 93 feet around the edge of the well (ground surface was set to an elevation of 100 feet). A steady state analysis was performed to estimate the maximum inflow that the well can accommodate. Using a well as described above, we obtain a static total flow of 0.16 ft³/sec. A plot depicting the resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors for the model is provided on Plate C-5. The average infiltration rate can be determined by taking the flow rate divided by the wetted surface area. The surface area is equal to 395.8 square feet which includes the side and bottom area. Based on the above flow rate and surface area, the average “measured” infiltration rate across the wetted surface area is 17.0 in/hr.  To evaluate the time required to empty the well once no more water is introduced, the model was reanalyzed with a variable head condition that was dependent upon the volume of water leaving the well. As water infiltrates into the surrounding soil, the volume of water remaining in the well is reduced as well as the resulting water head. A graph of the well head versus exit volume is provided Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 7 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. in Figure 2. The function assumes a void ratio of 0.4 within the zones occupied by gravel. If some other well configuration is used, then the analyses will require updating. The analysis was performed as a transient case over a total time of 2.5 hours. The conditions in the model were evaluated in 10 increments of time over the total duration. From our analyses, the water is evacuated from the chamber in approximately 0.55 hours. Plots depicting the resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors at selected times are provided in Appendix C on Plates C-6 through C-9. A plot of time versus water height in the well is shown on Figure 3. FIGURE 2- Well Head versus Exit Volume FIGURE 3- Water Head Versus Time 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 0 50 100 150 200 250 300Total Head (ft)Volume (ft3) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 00.511.522.5Height of Water in Well (ft)Time (hrs) Water Chamber Bottom Chamber Empty Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 8 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Dry Well Results of our work indicate a storm water disposal system consisting of a dry well is feasible at the site. The use of a dry well is not anticipated to result in worsening any adverse conditions or hazards that may be present for the proposed site development or adjacent properties including subsidence, landsliding, or liquefaction. As discussed above, the historic groundwater level in this area is approximately 60 feet. However, based on the aforementioned well data, we estimate that groundwater is currently at least 230 feet below ground surface and we anticipate will remain at least 200 feet below ground surface for the life of the project. Therefore, a dry well having a total depth of 40 feet will maintain a clearance above groundwater greater than the minimum required clearance of 10 feet. Based on the results of percolation testing and analyses, the well configuration as depicted on Plate 2 may utilize a “measured” peak flow rate of 0.16 ft³/sec. This flow rate corresponds to an average peak infiltration rate of 17.0 in./hr. This flow rate and infiltration rate only apply to the well configuration evaluated and will differ for other configurations. These values are “measured” values and as such, an appropriate factor of safety should be applied to determine the “design” rates. The design infiltration rate requires the application of a Reduction Factor in accordance with the County of Los Angeles GS200.2 guidelines. Based on the county requirements, the reduction factor (safety factor) is determined by multiplying the partial reduction factors as indicated in Table 3 below. The RFt value is prescribed by the test method used. The RFv value is based on the fact that soil conditions are uniform within the infiltration zone, that a test was performed in close proximity to the proposed dry well location, and correlations with laboratory testing of site materials confirm the selected permeability rate obtained by the field test. The RFs value is based on the dry well providing a chamber that traps sediments and removes oils via an absorptive pillow or some other system providing for the removal of most sediment and oils before entering the dry well. TABLE 3 Reduction Factor Factor Value RFt 2.0 RFv 1.0 RFs 1.0 Total Reduction Factor (RF) 2.0 Note: Total Reduction Factor, RF= RFt x RFv x RFs Based on the above reduction factor, design of the system should be based on a peak “design” flow of 0.16 cfs/2.0 = 0.08 cfs. Once water flow to the well has ceased, we estimate the time to empty the chamber will be approximately 0.55 hours. The maximum volume that can be infiltrated by the dry well is defined by the following equation: Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 9 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 𝑉் ൌ ሺ𝑇஽ െ𝑇ௐሻ ∙𝑄ௐ ൅𝑉ௐ Where: VT= Total volume infiltrated TD= Allowable drawdown time of system TW= Time to empty well chamber QW= Design flow rate of well VW= Storage volume of dry well Assuming an allowable total drawdown time of 96 hours, the maximum total design capture volume (DCV) one dry well can dispose would be approximately (96-0.55) hrs x 0.08 cfs x 3600 s/hr = 27,490 cubic feet. The effective storage capacity of the dry will is 285 cubic feet. The well should be located at least 10 feet horizontally from any habitable structure. The actual flow capacity of the dry well could be less or more than the estimated value. As such, provisions should be made to accommodate excess flow quantities in the event the dry well does not infiltrate the anticipated amount. The design also assumes that sediments will be removed from the inflowing water through an upper chamber or other device. Sediments that are allowed to enter the dry well will tend to degrade the flow capacity by plugging up the infiltration surfaces. In general, the dry well shaft is anticipated to be adequately stable under temporary construction conditions for uncased drilling. However, friable materials are present and will likely slough during drilling. The contractor should be prepared to install the gravel and chamber immediately following the drilling of the shaft. Workers should not enter the shaft unless the excavation is laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements. The placement and compaction of backfill materials, including the gravel and slurry, should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant. Chamber A buried chamber system may be used in lieu of a dry well. Infiltration of storm water using a buried chamber is not anticipated to result in adverse geotechnical conditions at the site or surrounding sites including subsidence, landsliding, or liquefaction. Using a system that is founded at a depth of at least 5 feet below current grade, we recommend a “measured” infiltration rate of 2.0 in./hr. Applying the required reduction factor of 2 as previously discussed, we obtained a Design Infiltration Rate of 1.0 in./hr. The chambers should be located at least 10 feet horizontally from any habitable structure or property boundaries but otherwise can generally be located anywhere else on the property. The excavations for the chamber system should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant to confirm they expose native alluvial soils at the bottom and are consistent with the conditions anticipated herein. Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 10 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. LIMITATIONS This report is based on the geotechnical data as described herein. The materials encountered in our boring excavations and utilized in our laboratory testing for this investigation are believed representative of the project area, and the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are presented on that basis. However, soil and bedrock materials can vary in characteristics between points of exploration, both laterally and vertically, and those variations could affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. As such, observations by a geotechnical consultant during the construction phase of the storm water infiltration systems are essential to confirming the basis of this report. This report has been prepared consistent with that level of care being provided by other professionals providing similar services at the same locale and time period. The contents of this report are professional opinions and as such, are not to be considered a guaranty or warranty. This report should be reviewed and updated after a period of one year or if the site ownership or project concept changes from that described herein. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Borstein Enterprises to assist the project consultants in the design of the proposed development. This report has not been prepared for use by parties or projects other than those named or described herein. This report may not contain sufficient information for other parties or other purposes. This report is subject to review by the controlling governmental agency. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you should have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. David E. Albus Principal Engineer GE 2455 Enclosures: Plate 1- Geotechnical Map Plate 2- Dry Well Diagram Appendix A - Exploratory Logs Appendix B – Laboratory Testing Appendix C - Percolation Testing and Analyses Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 Page 11 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. REFERENCES Publications and Reports California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Report 024, "Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the El Monte 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California", 1998. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Well Data (accessed 2020): https://dpw.lacounty.gov/general/wells/ Procedure for Performing Field Permeability Testing by the Well Permeameter Method, by United States Department of The Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR 7300-89). Guidelines for Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting Low Impact Development Stormwater Infiltration, by County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Geotechnical and Materials Engineering Division (GS200.2). APPROXIMATEPROJECT SITE LIMITSB-1P-2P-1B-2B-3B-4B-5B-6EXPLANATION(Locations Approximate)0 50 100 200APPROX SCALE : 1" = 100'- Exploratory Boring- Percolation Test Boring1Plate:Date: 10/27/20213016.00Job No.:GEOTECHNICAL MAP©Google 2021 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX A EXPLORATORY LOGS Field Identification Sheet Light gray Description Order: Description, Color, Moisture, Density, Grain Size, Additional Description Gray Description % 0-5 trace 5-15 Dark gray with 15-30 30+Gravelly Sand with Silt trace Clay Moisture Silty Clay with Sand trace Gravel Gray Brown Dry Damp Moist Light brown Very Moist Wet Brown Density (Navfac) SPT CA 0-3 0-5 Dark Brown 3-8 5-13 8-14 13-22 14-25 22-40 Olive brown 25> 40> 2< 0-3 Olive 2-4 3-6 4-8 6-13 8-15 13-24 Yellow 15-30 24-48 30> 48> Yellowish brown Grain Size Description Sieve Size Approx. Size >12" Larger than basketball Yellowish red 3-12" Fist to basketball coarse 3/4-3" Thumb to Fist fine #4-3/4" Pea to Thumb Red coarse #10-4 Rock Salt to Pea medium #40-10 Sugar to Rock Salt fine #200-40 Flour to Sugar Reddish Brown Pass #200 Smaller than Flour Additional Description (ie. roots, pinhole pores, debris, etc.) Tan Trace 5% Moderate 15% Abundant 30% Albus & Associates, Inc. Plate A-0 absence of water near optimum below optimum Very Loose Sand Sand trace Silt Sand with Silt Silty Sand Example Very Soft Soft Stiff above optimum free water visible Loose Medium Dense More Examples Fines Sand Gravel Sand with Silt and Clay Sand trace Silt and Clay Sand with Silt trace Clay Very Stiff Hard Fine grained soils Medium Stiff Boulders Cobbles Dense Coarse grained soils Very Dense Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G WaterCoreBulk5 10 15 20 EXPLANATION Solid lines separate geologic units and/or material types. Dashed lines indicate unknown depth of geologic unit change or material type change. Solid black rectangle in Core column represents California Split Spoon sampler (2.5in ID, 3in OD). Double triangle in core column represents SPT sampler. Vertical Lines in core column represents Shelby sampler. Solid black rectangle in Bulk column respresents large bag sample. Other Laboratory Tests: Max = Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content EI = Expansion Index SO4 = Soluble Sulfate Content DSR = Direct Shear, Remolded DS = Direct Shear, Undisturbed SA = Sieve Analysis (1" through #200 sieve) Hydro = Particle Size Analysis (SA with Hydrometer) 200 = Percent Passing #200 Sieve Consol = Consolidation SE = Sand Equivalent Rval = R-Value ATT = Atterberg Limits Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-1 358 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 25 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM):Light brown, dry, fine to medium grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand with Gravel trace Silt (SP):Brown to yellowish brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Sand with Gravel (SP):Yellowish brown, damp to moist, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Gravelly Sand (SW):Yellowish brown, damp to moist, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand @ 10 ft, more coarse grained sand @ 15 ft, dry to damp, very dense Silty Sand (SM):Brown to yellowish brown, moist, very dense, fine grained sand @ 20 ft, medium dense Sand with Gravel trace Silt (SP):Brown, moist, dense, more fine grained sand 34 37 17 10 21 20 28 3.6 2.9 3.2 2.6 117.4 112.4 103.9 112.8 Max EI SO4 DS pH Resist Ch SA Hydro 200 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-2 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-1 358 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 35 40 45 50 Yellowish brown, very dense, more fine to coarse grained sand Gravelly Sand (SP):Light reddish brown, dry to damp, very dense, fine to coarse grained sand Sand with Silt (SP):Light reddish brown, damp to moist, very dense, fine grained sand Silty Sand (SM):Light reddish brown, damp to moist, very dense, fine grained sand, moderate fines Clayey Sand (SC):Brown to reddish brown, moist, hard, fine grained sand Total Depth 51.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 52 49 36 61 30 SA Hydro 200 200 ATT Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-3 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-2 357.9 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Gravelly Sand (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand @ 6 ft, dense, gravel up to 1 inch dia @ 10 ft, medium dense, cobbles observed in cuttings up to 6 inch dia Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 15 28 25 30 2.7 3.3 112.4 200 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-4 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-3 357.9 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Gravelly Sand trace Silt (SP): Yellowish brown, dry to damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand @ 4 ft, damp, loose, no silt, gravel up to 1 inch dia @ 6 ft, moist, medium dense @ 10 ft, 4 inch dia cobble observed in cuttings Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 19 12 27 2.3 3.1 3.4 104.9 109.8 Consol Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-5 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-4 358 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, moist, loose, fine to coarse grained sand Sand with Gravel (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, loose, fine to coarse grained sand @ 6 ft, medium dense @ 10 ft, more coarse grained sand Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 31 15 13 17 3.7 3.8 2.8 4.5 112.9 107.2 105.9 Consol Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-6 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-5 361 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand @ 4 ft, Yellowish brown Sand with Gravel (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings 17 20 34 3.4 4.6 3.1 108.7 -31.3 111.1 200 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-7 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 3016.00 9/7/2021 ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger Borstein Enterprises B-6 361.2 WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand Gravelly Sand (SP): Yellowish brown, damp, loose, fine to coarse grained sand @ 6 ft, medium dense, more coarse grained sand @ 10 ft, dense, more gravel 46 16 15 24 3.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 103.2 108.5 109.8 200 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-8 Total Depth 11.5 feet No Groundwater Boring backfilled with soil cuttings APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST PROGRAM Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM Soil Classification Soils encountered within the exploratory borings were initially classified in the field in general accordance with the visual-manual procedures of the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2488). The samples were re-examined in the laboratory and classifications reviewed and then revised where appropriate. The assigned group symbols are presented on the Exploration Logs provided in Appendix A. In-Situ Moisture Content and Dry Density Moisture content and dry density of in-place soil materials were determined in representative strata. Test data are summarized on the Exploration Logs, Appendix A. Atterberg Limits Atterberg Limits (Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index) were performed in accordance with Test Method ASTM D 4318. Pertinent test values are presented within Table B-1. Particle Size Analyses Particle size analyses were performed on representative samples of site materials in accordance with ASTM D 422. The results are presented graphically on the attached Plates B-1 and B-2. TABLE B-1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Boring No. Sample Depth (ft) Soil Description Test Results B-1 20 Silty Sand Passing No. 200 Sieve: 43.4 B-1 35 Gravelly Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 11.1 B-1 45 Sand with Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 17.7 B-1 50 Sandy Clay with Silt Liquid Limit (%): Plasticity Index (%): 25 7.2 B-2 10 Gravelly Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 10.7 B-5 10 Gravelly Sand with Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 20.3 B-6 4 Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 6.2 Note: Additional laboratory test results are provided on the boring logs provided in Appendix A. COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE Description Sand with Gravel trace Silt Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-1 3016.00 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Number Location B-1 GRAVELCOBBLES SILT AND CLAYSAND 15 Depth 6"3"1.5"3/4"3/8"4 10 20 40 60 100 200 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.00010.0010.010.1110100 U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes Percent RetainedPercent PassingGrain Size in Millimeters COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE Description Sand with Gravel trace Silt Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-2 3016.00 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Number Location B-1 GRAVELCOBBLES SILT AND CLAYSAND 30 Depth 6"3"1.5"3/4"3/8"4 10 20 40 60 100 200 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.00010.0010.010.1110100 U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes Percent RetainedPercent PassingGrain Size in Millimeters CONSOLIDATION Job Number Location Depth 3016.00 B-3 6 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-3 Description Sand 102.5 4 18.2 Initial Dry Density (pcf)Initial Moisture Content (%)Final Moisture Concent (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 1000 10000 100000CONSOLIDATION (%)NORMAL STRESS (psf) Field Saturated CONSOLIDATION Job Number Location Depth 3016.00 B-4 6 Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-4 Description Sand 106.5 4.9 18.7 Initial Dry Density (pcf)Initial Moisture Content (%)Final Moisture Concent (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 1000 10000 100000CONSOLIDATION (%)NORMAL STRESS (psf) Field Saturated ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX C PERCOLATION TESTING AND ANALYSES Client: Job. No.: 3016.00 Date Tested: Test by: ddalbus Location: Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 15 Elev. of Ground Surface (ft): Diam. of Test Hole (in): 8 Diam. of Casing (in): 3 Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0.3 Water Tempurature (C°): 21 Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used (minutes) (ft) (gal./min.) (gal) 0 9:35 12.5 6.60 0.00 1 9:36 12.5 6.40 6.50 2 9:37 12.5 6.10 13.00 2 9:37 12.5 5.92 16.12 3 9:38 12.5 5.80 19.13 4 9:39 12.5 5.56 24.99 5 9:40 12.50 5.46 30.67 6 9:41 12.50 5.36 36.18 7 9:42 12.50 5.20 41.59 9 9:44 12.50 5.00 52.15 11 9:46 12.50 4.86 62.35 23 9:58 12.30 4.70 121.51 35 10:10 12.3 4.70 178.87 45 10:20 12.30 4.70 225.87 55 10:30 21.30 4.70 272.87 Constant Head Time Field Percolation Testing - Constant Head 9/7/2021 P-1 Borstein Enterprises 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60Accumulated Flow - Gallons Time - Minutes ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-1 Client: Job. No.: 3016.00 Date Tested: Test by: ddalbus Location: Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 30 Elev. of Ground Surface (ft): Diam. of Test Hole (in): 8 Diam. of Casing (in): 3 Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0 Water Tempurature (C°): 21 Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used (minutes) (ft) (gal./min.) (gal) 0 12:15 26.95 1.00 0.00 2 12:17 26.95 0.98 1.98 3 12:18 26.85 0.86 2.97 5 12:20 26.8 0.78 4.81 7 12:22 26.8 0.68 6.45 13 12:28 26.8 0.68 10.83 29 12:44 26.80 0.68 21.71 45 13:00 26.80 0.68 32.59 Time Field Percolation Testing - Constant Head Borstein Enterprises 9/7/2021 P-2 Constant Head 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 0 10 20 30 40 50Accumulated Flow - Gallons Time - Minutes ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-2 J.N.:3016.00 Client: Borstein Enterprises Well No.: P-1 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Units: 1 14.7 feet 12 feet 2.7 feet 4.0 Inches Minimum Volume Required:361.1 Gal. 4.7 Gal/min. 21 Celsius 0.9647 ft^3/min. Ignore Tᵤ 1 2.55E-02 ft/min. 18.34 in./hr. ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-3 Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady-State Condition (q): INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN Constant Head USBR 7300-89 Method Low Water Table High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3): Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁): Depth to Water (h₂): Height of Water in the Well (h₁-h₂=h): Radius of Well (r): The presence or absence of a water table or impervious soil layer within a distance of less than three times that of the water depth in the well (measured from the water surface) will enable the water table to be classified as Condition I, Condition II, Condtion III. Low Water Table-When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table, or to an impervious soil layer which is considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a water table, is greater than three times the depth of water in the well, classify as Condition I. High Water Table-When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table or to an impervious layer is less than three times the depth of water in the well, a high water table condition exists. Use Condition II when the water table or impervious layer is below the well bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or impervious layer is above the well bottom. Temperature (T): (Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V): Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and the Water table (Tᵤ): Factor of Safety: Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀): Design k₂₀: J.N.:3016.00 Client: Borstein Enterprises Well No.: P-2 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Units: 1 30 feet 27 feet 3 feet 4.0 Inches Minimum Volume Required:454.8 Gal. 0.68 Gal/min. 21 Celsius 0.9647 ft^3/min. Ignore Tᵤ 1 3.13E-03 ft/min. 2.26 in./hr. ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-4 Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady-State Condition (q): INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN Constant Head USBR 7300-89 Method Low Water Table High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3): Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁): Depth to Water (h₂): Height of Water in the Well (h₁-h₂=h): Radius of Well (r): The presence or absence of a water table or impervious soil layer within a distance of less than three times that of the water depth in the well (measured from the water surface) will enable the water table to be classified as Condition I, Condition II, Condtion III. Low Water Table-When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table, or to an impervious soil layer which is considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a water table, is greater than three times the depth of water in the well, classify as Condition I. High Water Table-When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table or to an impervious layer is less than three times the depth of water in the well, a high water table condition exists. Use Condition II when the water table or impervious layer is below the well bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or impervious layer is above the well bottom. Temperature (T): (Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V): Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and the Water table (Tᵤ): Factor of Safety: Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀): Design k₂₀: Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr 0 5 10 15 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-5 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. STEADY STATE Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. 93 Ft Radius (ft) 0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr 0 5 10 15 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-6 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 0.5 hrs Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr 0 5 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-7 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 1 hr Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr 0 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-8 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 1.5 hrs Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr 0 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-9 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 2.5 hrs Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 August 2022 NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS MISSION VILLAS PROJECT ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA August 2022 NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS MISSION VILLAS PROJECT ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: EPD Solutions, Inc. 2355 Main Street, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92614 Prepared by: LSA 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 553-0666 Project No. ESL2201.32 NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» i TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................ iii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4 Project Location And Description .................................................................................................. 4 Existing Land Uses In The Project Area ......................................................................................... 4 NOISE AND VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS .................................................................... 7 Characteristics of Sound ................................................................................................................ 7 Measurement of Sound................................................................................................................. 7 Physiological Effects of Noise ............................................................................................................. 8 Fundamentals of Vibration .......................................................................................................... 10 REGULATORY SETTING .............................................................................................. 12 Applicable Noise Standards ......................................................................................................... 12 California Code of Regulations ......................................................................................................... 12 City of Rosemead .............................................................................................................................. 12 Federal Transit Administration ......................................................................................................... 15 Applicable Vibration Standards ................................................................................................... 15 Federal Transit Administration ......................................................................................................... 16 OVERVIEW OF THE EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT .................................................. 17 Ambient Noise Measurements ................................................................................................... 17 Long-Term Noise Measurements ..................................................................................................... 17 Existing Aircraft Noise ................................................................................................................. 18 PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 20 Short-Term Construction Noise Impacts ..................................................................................... 20 Short-Term Construction Vibration Impacts ............................................................................... 23 Long-Term Off-Site Traffic Noise Impacts ................................................................................... 26 Long-Term Traffic-Related Vibration Impacts ............................................................................. 26 Best Construction Practices ......................................................................................................... 27 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ........................................................................................ 28 Exterior Noise Assessment .......................................................................................................... 28 Interior Noise Assessment........................................................................................................... 28 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 29 APPENDICES A: NOISE MONITORING DATA B: CONSTRUCTION NOISE CALCULATIONS NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» ii FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location ....................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2: Site Plan ................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3: Noise Monitoring Locations .................................................................................................. 19 TABLES Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms ................................................................................................ 9 Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources.................................................................... 10 Table C: Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix..................................................................................... 13 Table D: Maximum Sound Levels for Source Land Uses ....................................................................... 15 Table E: General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria ................................................................... 15 Table F: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis ...................................................... 16 Table G: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria ................................................................................ 16 Table H: Existing Noise Level Measurements ....................................................................................... 17 Table I: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels ......................................................................... 21 Table J: Potential Construction Noise Impacts at Nearest Receptor ................................................... 22 Table K: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment .................................................... 23 Table L: Potential Construction Vibration Annoyance Impacts at Nearest Receptor .......................... 24 Table M: Potential Construction Vibration Damage Impacts at Nearest Receptor ............................. 24 NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADT average daily trips ALUC Airport Land Use Compatibility CEQA California Environmental Quality Act City City of Rosemead CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA A-weighted decibel(s) FHWA Federal Highway Administration ft foot/feet FTA Federal Transit Administration FTA Manual FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual in/sec inch/inches per second Ldn day-night average noise level Leq equivalent continuous sound level Lmax maximum instantaneous sound level mi mile/miles Noise Element City of Rosemead General Plan Noise Element PPV peak particle velocity project Mission Villas Project EMT San Gabriel Valley Airport RMS root-mean-square STC Sound Transmission Class VdB vibration velocity decibels NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 4 INTRODUCTION This noise and vibration impact analysis has been prepared to evaluate the potential noise and vibration impacts and reduction measures associated with the proposed Mission Villas Project (project) in Rosemead, California. This report is intended to satisfy the City of Rosemead’s (City) requirement for a project-specific noise impact analysis by examining the impacts of the project site and evaluating noise reduction measures that the project may require. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located northeast of the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive in Rosemead, California. The project proposes to construct 37 residential units, including 29 single-family detached units and 8 duplex units as well as 17,298 square feet of open space area and 74 parking spaces on a 3.43-acre site. The site is currently vacant. The project site is surrounded by existing single-family homes immediately adjacent to the north and east, an existing church and single-family homes to the south opposite Mission Drive, as well as vacant land and agricultural uses to the west. Existing single- family homes are located to the west opposite the existing agricultural use and opposite Walnut Grove Avenue. The project’s main entry will be from Mission Drive. Figures 1 and 2 show the project location and site plan, respectively. EXISTING LAND USES IN THE PROJECT AREA The project site is surrounded primarily by residential uses and vacant parcels. The areas adjacent to the project site include the following uses: • North: Existing single-family residences; • East: Existing single-family residences; • South: Existing single-family residences and Sunrise House of Prayer opposite Mission Drive; and • West: Existing single-family residences beyond agricultural and vacant land. Project Location SOURCE: ArcGIS Online Topographic Map (2020) I:\ESL2201.32\G\Project_LocaƟon.ai (8/3/2022) FIGURE 1 Mission Villtas Project Project LocaƟon 0 400 800 FEET LEGEND Project Site Los Angeles County Orange County £¤101 ÃÃ2 ÃÃ170 ÃÃ142 ÃÃ72 ÃÃ90ÃÃ19 ÃÃ134 ÃÃ57 ÃÃ39 ÃÃ91 ÃÃ60 §¨¦405 §¨¦110 §¨¦10 §¨¦105 §¨¦10 §¨¦710 §¨¦210 §¨¦605 §¨¦5 Project Vicinity Project Location 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MAIL9 10 11 12 13 20 21 22 23 24 25 14 15 16 17 18 19 38.29' 42.62' 26.17' 26.17' 32.67'32.67' 26.17' 26.17' 33.48' 26.17' 26.17' 32.67' 32.67' 26.17' 26.17' 38.35'76.50'86.00'76.62'86.14'S89°55'40"W 174.11'S00°56'10"E 542.70'N00°19'33"W 254.20'N28°55'42"E 389.37'S64°18' 3 2 " E 2 5 0 . 3 7 'S20°14'36"W 169.63'N89°08'21"E 86.93'20.014.08.00 15.0015.3017.2313.23 13.76 20.00 24.00 13.00 20.0014.018.00 20.0020.73 18.0010.0011.5030.009.018.09.018.0 8.00 20.00 5 TYP 5 TYP 19.15 6.020.0038.00 13.00 13.00 20.00 24.00 20.00TYP 12.17 10.17 14.69 11.00 20.003TYP3TYP21.010.0 8.0 13.05 12.03 M M SBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19-52D SBEPAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTSSO CALIF EDISON CONO SITUSAPN: 5389-005-800 QUYEN Y TO4629 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-042JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043MIKE B TO/TRITIA TO4623 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-041 WILLIAM J STONECYPHER JR4617 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-040 CARLOS VILLAGRAN/KAREN VILLAGRAN4613 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-039 FENGYI J SITU/TRACY F SITU4607 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-038 NGO & BANH FAMILY TRUSTNGO ALEXANDER D TR4603 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-037 JASON SAM/FRAUSTINA SAM4549 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-036 LAIRD ANDERSON/DONNA B ANDERSON4545 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-035 BRYANT M TANG4539 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-034 LENK TRUSTLENK JANET M TR4535 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-033 KOKICHI NAKAZAWA/SUMIE NAKAZAWA4529 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-032 SA N D Y H W U 86 3 9 M I S S I O N D R APN : 5 3 8 9 - 0 0 9 - 0 2 6 DE H O N G 8637 M I S S I O N D R APN: 5 3 8 9 - 0 0 9 - 0 2 8 DUBOIS FA M I L Y T R U S T DUBOIS WA Y N E A & DOROTHY A T R S8635 MISSI O N D RAPN: 5389- 0 0 9 - 0 2 74040803232886.016.0DU5 DU 9 DU 7 DU 10 DU11 DU 12 DU13 DU 14 DU15 DU 16 DU 17 DU 20 DU21 DU 22 DU23 DU32 DU 33 DU 31 DU 34 DU 35 DU 24 DU 25 DU 26 DU27 DU 28 DU 29 DU 30 DU 18 DU 19 DU1 DU 2 DU 3 DU 6 DU 4 DU 8 DU36 DU 37 L01 L02 L03TYP L05 L06 L07TYP L08 TYP L04TYP C01 C02 C02 C02 L05 P01TYP W01 TYP SOURCE: Architeyk FIGURE 2 Site Plan Mission Villas Project I:\ESL2201.32\G\Site_Plan.ai (8/3/2022) 025 50 FEET NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 7 NOISE AND VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUND Noise is usually defined as unwanted sound. Noise consists of any sound that may produce physiological or psychological damage and/or interfere with communication, work, rest, recreation, and sleep. To the human ear, sound has two significant characteristics: pitch and loudness. Pitch is generally an annoyance, while loudness can affect the ability to hear. Pitch is the number of complete vibrations, or cycles per second, of a sound wave, which results in the tone’s range from high to low. Loudness is the strength of a sound, and it describes a noisy or quiet environment; it is measured by the amplitude of the sound wave. Loudness is determined by the intensity of the sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the human ear. Sound intensity is the average rate of sound energy transmitted through a unit area perpendicular to the direction in which the sound waves are traveling. This characteristic of sound can be precisely measured with instruments. The analysis of a project defines the noise environment of the project area in terms of sound intensity and its effect on adjacent sensitive land uses. MEASUREMENT OF SOUND Sound intensity is measured with the A-weighted decibel (dBA) scale to correct for the relative frequency response of the human ear. That is, an A-weighted noise level de-emphasizes low and very high frequencies of sound, similar to the human ear’s de-emphasis of these frequencies. Decibels (dB), unlike the linear scale (e.g., inches or pounds), are measured on a logarithmic scale representing points on a sharply rising curve. For example, 10 dB is 10 times more intense than 0 dB, 20 dB is 100 times more intense than 0 dB, and 30 dB is 1,000 times more intense than 0 dB. Thirty decibels (30 dB) represents 1,000 times as much acoustic energy as 0 dB. The decibel scale increases as the square of the change, representing the sound pressure energy. A sound as soft as human breathing is about 10 times greater than 0 dB. The decibel system of measuring sound gives a rough connection between the physical intensity of sound and its perceived loudness to the human ear. A 10 dB increase in sound level is perceived by the human ear as only a doubling of the sound’s loudness. Ambient sounds generally range from 30 dB (very quiet) to 100 dB (very loud). Sound levels are generated from a source, and their decibel level decreases as the distance from that source increases. Sound levels dissipate exponentially with distance from their noise sources. For a single point source, sound levels decrease approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance from the source. This drop-off rate is appropriate for noise generated by stationary equipment. If noise is produced by a line source (e.g., highway traffic or railroad operations), the sound decreases 3 dB for each doubling of distance in a hard site environment. Line-source sound levels decrease 4.5 dB for each doubling of distance in a relatively flat environment with absorptive vegetation. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 8 There are many ways to rate noise for various time periods, but an appropriate rating of ambient noise affecting humans also accounts for the annoying effects of sound. The equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) is the total sound energy of time-varying noise over a sample period. However, the predominant rating scales for human communities in the State of California are the Leq and Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) or the day-night average noise level (Ldn) based on A-weighted decibels. CNEL is the time-weighted average noise over a 24-hour period, with a 5 dBA weighting factor applied to the hourly Leq for noises occurring from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. (defined as relaxation hours) and a 10 dBA weighting factor applied to noises occurring from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (defined as sleeping hours). Ldn is similar to the CNEL scale but without the adjustment for events occurring during relaxation hours. CNEL and Ldn are within 1 dBA of each other and are normally interchangeable. The City uses the CNEL noise scale for long-term traffic noise impact assessment. Other noise rating scales of importance when assessing the annoyance factor include the maximum instantaneous noise level (Lmax), which is the highest sound level that occurs during a stated time period. The noise environments discussed in this analysis for short-term noise impacts are specified in terms of maximum levels denoted by Lmax, which reflects peak operating conditions and addresses the annoying aspects of intermittent noise. It is often used together with another noise scale, or noise standards in terms of percentile noise levels, in noise ordinances for enforcement purposes. For example, the L10 noise level represents the noise level exceeded 10 percent of the time during a stated period. The L50 noise level represents the median noise level. Half the time the noise level exceeds this level, and half the time it is less than this level. The L90 noise level represents the noise level exceeded 90 percent of the time and is considered the background noise level during a monitoring period. For a relatively constant noise source, the Leq and L50 are approximately the same. Noise impacts can be described in three categories. The first category includes audible impacts, which are increases in noise levels noticeable to humans. Audible increases in noise levels generally refer to a change of 3 dB or greater because this level has been found to be barely perceptible in exterior environments. The second category, potentially audible, refers to a change in the noise level between 1 dB and 3 dB. This range of noise levels has been found to be noticeable only in laboratory environments. The last category includes changes in noise levels of less than 1 dB, which are inaudible to the human ear. Only audible changes in existing ambient or background noise levels are considered potentially significant. Physiological Effects of Noise Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to sound levels higher than 85 dBA. Exposure to high sound levels affects the entire system, with prolonged sound exposure in excess of 75 dBA increasing body tensions, thereby affecting blood pressure and functions of the heart and the nervous system. In comparison, extended periods of sound exposure above 90 dBA would result in permanent cell damage. When the sound level reaches 120 dBA, a tickling sensation occurs in the human ear, even with short-term exposure. This level of sound is called the threshold of feeling. As the sound reaches 140 dBA, the tickling sensation is replaced by a feeling of pain in the ear (i.e., the threshold of pain). A sound level of 160–165 dBA will result in dizziness or a NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 9 loss of equilibrium. The ambient or background noise problem is widespread and generally more concentrated in urban areas than in outlying, less developed areas. Table A lists definitions of acoustical terms, and Table B shows common sound levels and their sources. Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms Term Definitions Decibel, dB A unit of sound measurement that denotes the ratio between two quantities that are proportional to power; the number of decibels is 10 times the logarithm (to the base 10) of this ratio. Frequency, Hz Of a function periodic in time, the number of times that the quantity repeats itself in 1 second (i.e., the number of cycles per second). A-Weighted Sound Level, dBA The sound level obtained by use of A-weighting. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise. (All sound levels in this report are A-weighted unless reported otherwise.) L01, L10, L50, L90 The fast A-weighted noise levels that are equaled or exceeded by a fluctuating sound level 1%, 10%, 50%, and 90% of a stated time period, respectively. Equivalent Continuous Noise Level, Leq The level of a steady sound that, in a stated time period and at a stated location, has the same A-weighted sound energy as the time-varying sound. Community Noise Equivalent Level, CNEL The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight, obtained after the addition of 5 dBA to sound levels occurring in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and after the addition of 10 dBA to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Day/Night Noise Level, Ldn The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight, obtained after the addition of 10 dBA to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Lmax, Lmin The maximum and minimum A-weighted sound levels measured on a sound level meter, during a designated time interval, using fast time averaging. Ambient Noise Level The all-encompassing noise associated with a given environment at a specified time. Usually a composite of sound from many sources from many directions, near and far; no particular sound is dominant. Intrusive The noise that intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, time of occurrence, and tonal or informational content, as well as the prevailing ambient noise level. Source: Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control (Harris 1991). NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 10 Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources Noise Source A-Weighted Sound Level in Decibels Noise Environments Subjective Evaluations Near Jet Engine 140 Deafening 128 times as loud Civil Defense Siren 130 Threshold of Pain 64 times as loud Hard Rock Band 120 Threshold of Feeling 32 times as loud Accelerating Motorcycle at a Few Feet Away 110 Very Loud 16 times as loud Pile Driver; Noisy Urban Street/Heavy City Traffic 100 Very Loud 8 times as loud Ambulance Siren; Food Blender 95 Very Loud — Garbage Disposal 90 Very Loud 4 times as loud Freight Cars; Living Room Music 85 Loud — Pneumatic Drill; Vacuum Cleaner 80 Loud 2 times as loud Busy Restaurant 75 Moderately Loud — Near Freeway Auto Traffic 70 Moderately Loud Reference level Average Office 60 Quiet One-half as loud Suburban Street 55 Quiet — Light Traffic; Soft Radio Music in Apartment 50 Quiet One-quarter as loud Large Transformer 45 Quiet — Average Residence without Stereo Playing 40 Faint One-eighth as loud Soft Whisper 30 Faint — Rustling Leaves 20 Very Faint — Human Breathing 10 Very Faint Threshold of Hearing — 0 Very Faint — Source: Compiled by LSA (2022). FUNDAMENTALS OF VIBRATION Vibration refers to ground-borne noise and perceptible motion. Ground-borne vibration is almost exclusively a concern inside buildings and is rarely perceived as a problem outdoors, where the motion may be discernible, but without the effects associated with the shaking of a building there is less adverse reaction. Vibration energy propagates from a source through intervening soil and rock layers to the foundations of nearby buildings. The vibration then propagates from the foundation throughout the remainder of the structure. Building vibration may be perceived by occupants as the motion of building surfaces, the rattling of items sitting on shelves or hanging on walls, or a low- frequency rumbling noise. The rumbling noise is caused by the vibration of walls, floors, and ceilings that radiate sound waves. Annoyance from vibration often occurs when the vibration exceeds the threshold of perception by 10 dB or less. This is an order of magnitude below the damage threshold for normal buildings. Typical sources of ground-borne vibration are construction activities (e.g., blasting, pile-driving, and operating heavy-duty earthmoving equipment), steel-wheeled trains, and occasional traffic on rough roads. Problems with both ground-borne vibration and noise from these sources are usually localized to areas within approximately 100 feet (ft) from the vibration source, although there are examples of ground-borne vibration causing interference out to distances greater than 200 ft . When roadways are smooth, vibration from traffic, even heavy trucks, is rarely perceptible. It is assumed for most projects that the roadway surface will be smooth enough that ground-borne NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 11 vibration from street traffic will not exceed the impact criteria; however, construction of the project could result in ground-borne vibration that may be perceptible and annoying. Ground-borne noise is not likely to be a problem because noise arriving via the normal airborne path will usually be greater than ground-borne noise. Ground-borne vibration has the potential to disturb people and damage buildings. Although it is very rare for train-induced ground-borne vibration to cause even cosmetic building damage, it is not uncommon for construction processes such as blasting and pile-driving to cause vibration of sufficient amplitudes to damage nearby buildings. Ground-borne vibration is usually measured in terms of vibration velocity, either the root-mean-square (RMS) velocity or peak particle velocity (PPV). The RMS is best for characterizing human response to building vibration, and PPV is used to characterize the potential for damage. Decibel notation acts to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration. Vibration velocity level in decibels is defined as: Lv = 20 log10 [V/Vref] where “Lv” is the vibration velocity in decibels (VdB), “V” is the RMS velocity amplitude, and “Vref” is the reference velocity amplitude, or 1 x 10-6 inches/second (in/sec) used in the United States. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 12 REGULATORY SETTING APPLICABLE NOISE STANDARDS The applicable noise standards governing the project site include the criteria in the California Code of Regulations, the Noise Element of the City’s General Plan (Noise Element), and the City of Rosemead Municipal Code. California Code of Regulations Interior noise levels for residential habitable rooms are regulated by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations California Noise Insulation Standards. Title 24, Chapter 12, Section 1206.4, of the 2019 California Building Code requires that interior noise levels attributable to exterior sources not exceed 45 CNEL in any habitable room. A habitable room is a room used for living, sleeping, eating, or cooking. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, utility spaces, and similar areas are not considered habitable rooms for this regulation (Title 24 California Code of Regulations, Chapter 12, Section 1206.4). City of Rosemead Noise Element of the General Plan The City of Rosemead General Plan addresses noise in its Noise Element (General Plan 2010). The Noise Element contains goals and policies for noise control and abatement in the City. General noise goals for Rosemead aim to attain a healthier and quieter environment for all citizens while maintaining a reasonable level of economic progress and development. The City, consistent with the California Office of Planning and Research, has established land use compatibility guidelines for determining acceptable noise levels for specified land uses as shown in Table C. These land use compatibility guidelines are intended to be an advisory resource when considering changes in land use and policies, such as zoning modifications. The Issues, Goals, and Policies as well as the Implementation Actions in the City’s General Plan Noise Element are designed to provide noise-compatible land use relationships by establishing noise standards utilized for design and siting purposes and minimize noise impacts from significant noise generators. The following goals and policies are applicable to the proposed project: Issues, Goal, and Policies • Goal 1: Effective incorporation of noise considerations into land use planning decisions. ○ Policy 1.1: Ensure compliance with standards for interior and exterior noise established within the Noise Element and Zoning Code. ○ Policy 1.4: Encourage acoustical design in new construction NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 13 Table C: Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 14 ○ Policy 1.5: Require sound walls to be constructed in designated mixed-use districts where noise-sensitive land uses are located on adjacent properties. Goal 3: Effective implementation of measures to control non-transportation noise impacts. ○ Policy 3.1: Enforce provisions of the Community Noise Ordinance to mitigate noise conflicts. ○ Policy 3.2: Require that potential sources of noise be considered when approving new development to reduce the possibility of adverse affects. ○ Policy 3.3: Evaluate noise generated by construction activities to ensure compliance with the Community Noise Ordinance. ○ Policy 3.4: Establish and maintain coordination among the City departments involved in noise abatement. Implementation Actions • Goal 1: Effective incorporation of noise considerations into land use planning decisions. ○ Action 1.2: Incorporate noise reduction features during site planning to mitigate anticipated noise impacts on affected noise sensitive land uses. The noise contours, illustrated on the Existing Noise Contours Map, identify areas within the City exposed to noise levels greater than 60dB CNEL and shall be used to identify locations of potential conflict. Require acoustical analyses, as appropriate, for proposed residential development within the 60 dB CNEL or higher contour. New developments will be permitted only if appropriate mitigation measures are included. ○ Action 1.3: Enforce provisions of the California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24) that specify that indoor noise levels for multi-family residential living spaces shall not exceed 45 dB CNEL. The standard is defined as the combined effect of all noise sources, and is implemented when existing or future exterior noise levels exceed 60 dB CNEL. Title 24 further requires that the standard be applied to all new hotels, motels, apartment houses, and dwellings other than detached single-family dwellings. The City will additionally apply the standard to single-family dwellings and condominium conversion projects. City of Rosemead Municipal Code Section 8.36.030 of the City’s Municipal Code limits construction and demolition activities to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Construction activities should not take place at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. No person shall operate or allow the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, or alteration or demolition work outside of these hours to prevent noise disturbances. Section 8.36.060 of the City’s Municipal Code, Noise Standards, establishes limits on non-impulsive noise where no person shall maintain, create, operate, or cause noise on private property to not exceed the noise standards shown in Table D. The standards are applicable to all receptor properties NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 15 within a designated noise zone. This section also establishes an allowable interior noise level of 45 dBA at all residential receptors during anytime of the day. Table D: Maximum Sound Levels for Source Land Uses Noise Zone Type of Land Use (Receptor Property) Time Interval Allowable Exterior Noise Level (dBA) I Single-,double-or multiple family residential Daytime1 60 Nighttime2 45 II Commercial Daytime1 65 Nighttime2 60 III Industrial or manufacturing Anytime 70 Source: Section 8.36.060(A) of the City of Rosemead Municipal Code (2021). 1 Daytime means 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 2 Nighttime means 10:01 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. dBA = A-weighted decibels Leq = equivalent continuous sound level Federal Transit Administration Although the City does not have daytime construction noise level limits for activities that occur within the specified hours in Section 11.80.030(D)(7) to determine potential California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) noise impacts, construction noise was assessed using criteria from the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018) (FTA Manual). Table E shows the FTA’s General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria based on the composite noise levels per construction phase. Table E: General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria Land Use Daytime 1-hour Leq (dBA) Nighttime 1-hour Leq (dBA) Residential 90 80 Commercial 100 100 Industrial 100 100 Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018). dBA = A-weighted decibels Leq = equivalent continuous sound level APPLICABLE VIBRATION STANDARDS Given the City of Rosemead has not established its own vibration impact criteria, the following information provides standards to which potential vibration impacts will be compared. Vibration standards included in the FTA Manual are used in this analysis for ground-borne vibration impacts on human annoyance and potential damage. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 16 Federal Transit Administration Table F provides the criteria for assessing the potential for interference or annoyance from vibration levels in a building. The criteria for annoyance impacts resulting from ground-borne vibration and noise are based on the average vibration levels during construction. Table G provides the criteria for assessing the potential for damage from vibration levels generated during construction to surrounding structures. The criteria for annoyance impacts resulting from ground-borne vibration and noise are based on the maximum vibration levels during construction at the project property Table F: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis Land Use Max Lv (VdB)1 Description of Use Workshop 90 Vibration that is distinctly felt. Appropriate for workshops and similar areas not as sensitive to vibration. Office 84 Vibration that can be felt. Appropriate for offices and similar areas not as sensitive to vibration. Residential Day 78 Vibration that is barely felt. Adequate for computer equipment and low- power optical microscopes (up to 20×). Residential Night and Operating Rooms 72 Vibration is not felt, but ground-borne noise may be audible inside quiet rooms. Suitable for medium-power microscopes (100×) and other equipment of low sensitivity. Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018). 1 As measured in 1/3-octave bands of frequency over a frequency range of 8 to 80 Hertz. FTA = Federal Transit Administration LV = velocity in decibels Max = maximum VdB = vibration velocity decibels Table G: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria Building Category PPV (in/sec) Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster) 0.50 Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.30 Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.20 Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018). FTA = Federal Transit Administration in/sec = inch/inches per second PPV = peak particle velocity NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 17 OVERVIEW OF THE EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT The primary existing noise sources in the project area are transportation facilities. Traffic on Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue are a steady source of ambient noise. AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS Long-Term Noise Measurements Two long-term (24-hour) noise level measurements were conducted on June 21 through June 22, 2022, using two Larson Davis Spark 706RC Dosimeters, and one short term measurement using a Larson Davis 831 Sound Level Meter. Table H provides a summary of the measured hourly noise levels from the noise level measurements. Hourly noise levels at surrounding sensitive uses are as low as 37.3 dBA Leq during nighttime hours and 43.0 dBA Leq during daytime hours. Noise monitoring data results are provided in Appendix A. Figure 3 shows the noise monitoring locations. Table H: Existing Noise Level Measurements Location Location Description Daytime Noise Levels1 (dBA Leq) Evening Noise Levels2 (dBA Leq) Nighttime Noise Levels3 (dBA Leq) Average Daily Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) LT-1 Southern corner of project site, on a fence along the backyard of 8623 Mission Drive 50.9 – 62.5 49.2 – 56.1 42.6 – 52.1 57.0 LT-2 Western corner of project site, bordering a power line near a fence next to a power line tower. 47.6 – 59.8 45.4 – 54.3 41.9 – 50.7 55.2 ST-14 Northeast corner of project site, south of 8612 Zerelda Street 43.0 – 55.2 40.8 – 49.7 37.3 – 46.1 50.6 Source: Compiled by LSA (August 2022). 1 Daytime Noise Levels = noise levels during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 2 Evening Noise Levels = noise levels during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 3 Nighttime Noise Levels = noise levels during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 4 Short-term measurement data estimated based on corresponding long-term dBA = A-weighted decibels ft = foot/feet CNELLdn = Day-night Level Leq = equivalent continuous sound level NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 18 EXISTING AIRCRAFT NOISE Airport-related noise levels are primarily associated with aircraft engine noise made while aircraft are taking off, landing, or running their engines while still on the ground. The closest airport to the proposed project site is San Gabriel Valley Airport (EMT), formerly known as El Monte Airport, located approximately 2.6 miles (mi) east of the project site. Based on the Airport’s Master Plan report (1995), the project is located well outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour of the airport. Therefore, the project site is not expected to experience airport-related noise levels in excess of the City of Rosemead exterior standards. No further analysis is necessary. SOURCE: Google Earth 2021 I:\ESL2201.32\G\Noise_Locs.ai (8/3/22) FIGURE 3 Mission Villas Project Noise Monitoring LocaƟons 0 100 200 FEET LEGEND - Project Site Boundary - Short-Term Noise Monitoring LocaƟon - Long-Term Noise Monitoring LocaƟonLLT-1-1 ST-1-1 LT-1 ST-1 ST-1-1ST-1 LT-1-1LT-1 LT-2-2LT-2 Miss o n D r Misson Dr BartleƩ AveBartleƩ AveWa ln u t G r o ve A veWalnut Gr ove AveMiss o n D r BartleƩ AveWa ln u t G r o ve A ve NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 20 PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACTS Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during the construction of the proposed project. First, construction crew commutes and the transport of construction equipment and materials to the site for the proposed project would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading to the site. Although there would be a relatively high single-event noise-exposure potential causing intermittent noise nuisance (passing trucks at 50 ft would generate up to 84 dBA Lmax), the effect on longer-term ambient noise levels would be small when compared to existing daily traffic volumes on Mission Drive. Because construction-related vehicle trips would not approach existing daily traffic volumes, traffic noise would not increase by 3 dBA CNEL. A noise level increase of less than 3 dBA would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, short-term, construction-related impacts associated with worker commute and equipment transport to the project site would be less than significant. The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated during construction, which includes demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating on the project site. Construction is completed in discrete steps, each of which has its own mix of equipment and, consequently, its own noise characteristics. These various sequential phases would change the character of the noise generated on the site and, therefore, the noise levels surrounding the site as construction progresses. Despite the variety in the type and size of construction equipment, similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow construction-related noise ranges to be categorized by work phase. Table I lists typical construction equipment noise levels recommended for noise impact assessments, based on a distance of 50 ft between the equipment and a noise receptor, taken from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA 2006). In addition to the reference maximum noise level, the usage factor provided in Table I is used to calculate the hourly noise level impact for each piece of equipment based on the following equation:   −+=50log20.).log(10..)(DFULEequipLeq where: Leq (equip) = Leq at a receiver resulting from the operation of a single piece of equipment over a specified time period. E.L. = noise emission level of the particular piece of equipment at a reference distance of 50 ft. U.F. = usage factor that accounts for the fraction of time that the equipment is in use over the specified period of time. D = distance from the receiver to the piece of equipment. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 21 Table I: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels Equipment Description Acoustical Usage Factor (%)1 Maximum Noise Level (Lmax) at 50 Feet2 Auger Drill Rig 20 84 Backhoes 40 80 Compactor (ground) 20 80 Compressor 40 80 Cranes 16 85 Dozers 40 85 Dump Trucks 40 84 Excavators 40 85 Flat Bed Trucks 40 84 Forklift 20 85 Front-end Loaders 40 80 Graders 40 85 Impact Pile Drivers 20 95 Jackhammers 20 85 Paver 50 77 Pickup Truck 40 55 Pneumatic Tools 50 85 Pumps 50 77 Rock Drills 20 85 Rollers 20 85 Scrapers 40 85 Tractors 40 84 Trencher 50 80 Welder 40 73 Source: FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide, Table 1 (FHWA 2006). Note: Noise levels reported in this table are rounded to the nearest whole number. 1 Usage factor is the percentage of time during a construction noise operation that a piece of construction equipment is operating at full power. 2 Maximum noise levels were developed based on Specification 721.560 from the Central Artery/ Tunnel program to be consistent with the City of Boston’s Noise Code for the “Big Dig” project. FHWA = Federal Highway Administration Lmax = maximum instantaneous sound level Each piece of construction equipment operates as an individual point source. Using the following equation, a composite noise level can be calculated when multiple sources of noise operate simultaneously: 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 (𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝐿𝐿)=10 ∗log10 ��10𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿10𝐿𝐿 1 � Using the equations from the methodology above, the reference information in Table I, and the construction equipment list provided, the composite noise level of each construction phase was calculated. The project construction composite noise levels at a distance of 50 feet would range from 74 dBA Leq to 88 dBA Leq, with the highest noise levels occurring during the site preparation and paving phases. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 22 Once composite noise levels are calculated, reference noise levels can then be adjusted for distance using the following equation: 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 (𝑎𝑎𝑐𝑐 𝑑𝑑𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑎𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑐𝑐𝐿𝐿 𝑋𝑋)=𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 (𝑎𝑎𝑐𝑐 50 𝑓𝑓𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝑐𝑐)−20 ∗lo g10 �𝑋𝑋50� In general, this equation shows that doubling the distance would decrease noise levels by 6 dBA, while halving the distance would increase noise levels by 6 dBA. Table J shows the nearest sensitive uses to the project site, their distance from the center of construction activities, and composite noise levels expected during construction. These noise level projections do not consider intervening topography or barriers. Construction equipment calculations are provided in Appendix B. Table J: Potential Construction Noise Impacts at Nearest Receptor Receptor (Location) Composite Noise Level (dBA Leq) at 50 feet1 Distance (feet) Composite Noise Level (dBA Leq) Residences (East) 88 115 81 Residences (West) 350 71 Residences (North) 350 71 Residences (South) 430 69 Source: Compiled by LSA (2022). 1 The composite construction noise level represents the paving/site preparation phases, which are expected to result in the greatest noise level as compared to other phases. dBA = A-weighted decibels Leq = equivalent continuous sound level While construction noise will vary, it is expected that composite noise levels during construction at the nearest off-site sensitive residential use to the east would reach an average noise level of 81 dBA Leq during daytime hours. These predicted noise levels would only occur when all construction equipment is operating simultaneously and, therefore, are assumed to be rather conservative in nature. While construction-related short-term noise levels have the potential to be higher than existing ambient noise levels in the project area under existing conditions, the noise impacts would no longer occur once project construction is completed. As stated above, construction activities are regulated by the City’s Noise Ordinance. The proposed project would comply with the construction hours specified in the City’s Noise Ordinance, which states that construction activities are allowed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays. As it relates to off-site uses, construction-related noise levels would remain below the daytime 90 dBA Leq 1-hour construction noise level criteria established by the FTA for residential and similar sensitive uses and, therefore, would be considered less than significant. Best construction practices presented at the end of this analysis shall be implemented to minimize noise impacts to surrounding receptors. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 23 SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION IMPACTS This construction vibration impact analysis discusses the level of human annoyance using vibration levels in VdB and assesses the potential for building damages using vibration levels in PPV (in/sec). This is because vibration levels calculated in RMS are best for characterizing human response to building vibration, while calculating vibration levels in PPV is best for characterizing the potential for damage. Table K shows the PPV and VdB values at 25 ft from the construction vibration source. As shown in Table K, bulldozers and other heavy-tracked construction equipment (expected to be used for this project) generate approximately 0.089 PPV in/sec or 87 VdB of ground-borne vibration when measured at 25 ft, based on the FTA Manual. The distance to the nearest buildings for vibration impact analysis is measured between the nearest off-site buildings and the project construction boundary (assuming the construction equipment would be used at or near the project setback line). Table K: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment Equipment Reference PPV/LV at 25 ft PPV (in/sec) LV (VdB)1 Pile Driver (Impact), Typical 0.644 104 Pile Driver (Sonic), Typical 0.170 93 Vibratory Roller 0.210 94 Hoe Ram 0.089 87 Large Bulldozer2 0.089 87 Caisson Drilling 0.089 87 Loaded Trucks2 0.076 86 Jackhammer 0.035 79 Small Bulldozer 0.003 58 Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018). 1 RMS vibration velocity in decibels (VdB) is 1 µin/sec. 2 Equipment shown in bold is expected to be used on site. µin/sec = microinches per second ft = foot/feet FTA = Federal Transit Administration in/sec = inch/inches per second LV = velocity in decibels PPV = peak particle velocity RMS = root-mean-square VdB = vibration velocity decibels The formulae for vibration transmission are provided below, and Tables L and M provide a summary of off-site construction vibration levels. LvdB (D) = LvdB (25 ft) – 30 Log (D/25) PPVequip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5 As shown in Table F, above, the threshold at which vibration levels would result in annoyance would be 78 VdB for daytime residential uses. As shown in Table G, the FTA guidelines indicate that for a non-engineered timber and masonry building, the construction vibration damage criterion is 0.2 in/sec in PPV. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 24 Table L: Potential Construction Vibration Annoyance Impacts at Nearest Receptor Receptor (Location) Reference Vibration Level (VdB) at 25 ft1 Distance (ft) 2 Vibration Level (VdB) Residences (East) 87 115 67 Residences (West) 360 52 Residences (North) 360 52 Residences (South) 430 50 Source: Compiled by LSA (2022). 1 The reference vibration level is associated with a large bulldozer, which is expected to be representative of the heavy equipment used during construction. 2 The reference distance is associated with the average condition, identified by the distance from the center of construction activities to surrounding uses. ft = foot/feet VdB = vibration velocity decibels Table M: Potential Construction Vibration Damage Impacts at Nearest Receptor Receptor (Location) Reference Vibration Level (PPV) at 25 ft1 Distance (ft)2 Vibration Level (PPV) Residences (East) 0.089 5 0.995 Residences (West) 250 0.352 Residences (North) 10 0.003 Residences (South) 100 0.011 Source: Compiled by LSA (2022). 1 The reference vibration level is associated with a large bulldozer, which is expected to be representative of the heavy equipment used during construction. 2 The reference distance is associated with the peak condition, identified by the distance from the perimeter of construction activities to surrounding structures. ft = foot/feet PPV = peak particle velocity Based on the information provided in Table L, vibration levels are expected to approach 67 VdB at the closest residential uses located immediately east of the project site, which is below the 78 VdB threshold for annoyance. The closest structure to the project site is the residential uses to the east of site, approximately 5 ft from the limits of construction activity. It is expected that vibration levels generated by dump trucks and other large equipment that would be as close as 5 feet from the property line would generate ground-borne vibration levels of up to 0.995 PPV (in/sec) at the closest structure to the project site. This vibration level would exceed the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold considered safe for non-engineered timber and masonry buildings. It is expected that construction activities utilizing heavy equipment would generate vibration levels greater than 0.2 in/sec in PPV when operating within 10 feet of the property line, which would result in a potentially significant impact. Therefore, the use of heavy equipment should be prohibited within 15 feet of existing structures to ensure that vibration levels NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 25 are below the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold. At 15 feet, dump trucks and other large equipment would generate ground-borne vibrations levels of up to 0.191 PPV (in/sec) at the closest structure to the project site and would not exceed the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold. If heavy equipment is necessary within 15 feet of the east boundary of the project site, further vibration assessments as presented in mitigation measures (Mitigation Measure NOI-1) would be implemented to reduce potential impacts. Therefore, construction would not result in any vibration damage and impacts would be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1. Mitigation Measure NOI-1 Construction Vibration Damage. Due to the close proximity to surrounding structures, the City of Rosemead (City) Director of Community Development, or designee, shall verify prior to issuance of demolition or grading permits, that the approved plans require that the construction contractor shall implement the following measures during project construction activities to ensure that damage does not occur at surrounding structures: The use of heavy equipment shall be prohibited within 15 feet of existing structures. If heavy equipment is necessary within 15 feet of existing structures, the following measures shall be implemented: Identify structures that could be affected by ground-borne vibration and would be located within 15 feet of where heavy construction equipment would be used. This task shall be conducted by a qualified structural engineer as approved by the City’s Director of Community Development or designee. Develop a vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan for approval by the City’s Director of Community Development, or designee, to identify structures where monitoring would be conducted; set up a vibration monitoring schedule; define structure-specific vibration limits; and address the need to conduct photo, elevation, and crack surveys to document before and after construction conditions. Construction contingencies would be identified for when vibration levels approached the limits. At a minimum, monitor vibration during initial demolition activities. Monitoring results may indicate the need for more intensive measurements if vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold. When vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) limit, suspend construction and implement contingencies as NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 26 identified in the approved vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan to either lower vibration levels or secure the affected structures. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would reduce impacts to a less than significant level by prohibiting heavy equipment within 15 feet of existing structures or requiring a vibration monitoring plan that would ensure that vibration levels are below the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) and vibration damage would not occur. Therefore, vibration impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. Because construction activities are regulated by the City’s Municipal Code, which states that construction, maintenance, or demolition activities are not allowed between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturdays, or at any time on Sundays and federal holidays, vibration impacts would not occur during the more sensitive nighttime hours. LONG-TERM OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS In order to assess the potential traffic impacts related to the proposed project, a Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis (EPD Solutions, Inc. 2022) has been prepared. Based on the analysis results, it was determined that a net additional 349 average daily trips (ADT) would be generated by the proposed project. The expected traffic volume on the adjacent segment of Mission Drive could be as low as 15,000 (City of Rosemead General Plan 2010). The following equation was used to determine the potential impacts of the project: Change in CNEL = 10 𝑙𝑙𝑐𝑐𝑙𝑙10�𝑉𝑉𝑒𝑒+𝑝𝑝/𝑉𝑉𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝐿𝐿𝑒𝑒� where: Vexisting = existing daily volumes Ve+p = existing daily volumes plus project Change in CNEL = increase in noise level due to the project The results of the calculations show that an increase of approximately 0.1 dBA CNEL is expected along the streets adjacent to the project site. A noise level increase of less than 1 dBA would not be perceptible to the human ear; therefore, the traffic noise increase in the vicinity of the project site resulting from the proposed project would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. LONG-TERM TRAFFIC-RELATED VIBRATION IMPACTS The proposed project would not generate vibration levels related to on-site operations. In addition, vibration levels generated from project-related traffic on the adjacent roadways are unusual for on-road vehicles because the rubber tires and suspension systems of on-road vehicles provide vibration isolation. Vibration levels generated from project-related traffic on the adjacent roadways would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 27 BEST CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES In addition to compliance with the City’s Municipal Code allowed hours of construction of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays, the following recommendations would reduce construction noise to the extent feasible: •The project construction contractor should equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers, consistent with manufacturer’s standards. •The project construction contractor should locate staging areas away from off-site sensitive uses during the later phases of project development. •The project construction contractor should place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site whenever feasible. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 28 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY The dominant source of noise in the project vicinity is traffic noise from roadways in the vicinity of the project. EXTERIOR NOISE ASSESSMENT Based on the monitoring results shown in Table H, the existing measured noise levels at the project site closest to Mission Drive, approximately 95 feet away from Mission Drive centerline, is 57.0 dBA CNEL. Based on the project site plan, the rear yards of units 1-4 and 37 are approximately 45 feet away from Mission Drive centerline, resulting in estimated noise levels approaching 62 dBA, without accounting for shielding provided by the proposed 6ft wall, which would reduce the noise levels by 5 dBA or more, resulting in noise levels below 60 dBA. This level is below the City’s 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standard. Therefore, no additional mitigation would be required. INTERIOR NOISE ASSESSMENT As discussed above, per the California Code of Regulations and the City’s Implementation Actions, an interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL or less is required for all noise-sensitive rooms. Based on the expected future exterior noise levels at the façades of the lots closest to Mission Drive approaching 62 dBA CNEL, a minimum noise reduction of 17 dBA would be required. Based on reference information from transmission loss test reports for various Milgard windows (Milgard 2008), standard building construction along with standard windows, typically in the STC 25- 28 range, a reduction of 25 dBA or more would be achieved with windows in a closed position. With a reduction of 25 dBA or more, interior noise levels would remain below the City’s interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL. The project includes a HVAC system for all unit so that windows can remained closed. Once final plans are available to detail the exterior wall construction and a window manufacturer has been chosen, a Final Acoustical Report (FAR) would be required to confirm the reduction capability of the exterior façades and to identify any specific upgrades necessary to achieve an interior noise level of 45 dBA CNEL or below. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 29 REFERENCES City of Rosemead. 2010. General Plan Noise Element. April 13. –––––. 2021. Municipal Code. Website: https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances (accessed July 2022). December 2. County of Los Angeles. El Monte Airport Master Plan Report. 1995. June. EPD Solutions, Inc. 2022. Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis for 8601 Mission Drive. January 21. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2006. Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. January. Washington, D.C. Website: www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_ noise/rcnm/rcnm.pdf (accessed March 2022). Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Office of Planning and Environment. Report No. 0123. September. Harris, Cyril M., editor. 1991. Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control. Third Edition. Milgard. 2008. Various Transmission Loss Reports. State of California. 2020. 2019 California Green Building Standards Code. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1978. Protective Noise Levels, Condensed Version of EPA Levels Document, EPA 550/9-79-100. November. NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» APPENDIX A NOISE MONITORING DATA Noise Measurement Survey – 24 HR Project Number: ESL2201.32 Test Personnel: Kevin Nguyendo Project Name: Mission Villas Equipment: Spark 706RC (SN:18905) Site Number: LT-1 Date: 6/21/2022 Time: From 11:00 a.m. To 11:00 a.m. Site Location: Southern corner on a fence along the backyard of 8623 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA 91770. Primary Noise Sources: Regular traffic noise on Mission Drive. Comments: On a chain link fence all around. Photo: Long-Term (24-Hour) Noise Level Measurement Results at LT-1 Start Time Date Noise Level (dBA) Leq Lmax Lmin 11:00 AM 6/21/22 51.5 71.5 40.1 12:00 PM 6/21/22 50.9 62.6 39.5 1:00 PM 6/21/22 51.7 66.0 41.6 2:00 PM 6/21/22 52.1 67.2 41.1 3:00 PM 6/21/22 52.5 72.3 41.3 4:00 PM 6/21/22 52.3 70.5 39.7 5:00 PM 6/21/22 52.2 64.6 39.5 6:00 PM 6/21/22 54.6 76.6 41.3 7:00 PM 6/21/22 56.1 73.6 40.7 8:00 PM 6/21/22 52.0 75.3 39.0 9:00 PM 6/21/22 49.2 67.5 38.3 10:00 PM 6/21/22 47.6 68.6 37.5 11:00 PM 6/21/22 45.1 61.2 37.1 12:00 AM 6/22/22 44.7 61.6 37.1 1:00 AM 6/22/22 42.9 61.8 35.6 2:00 AM 6/22/22 42.6 60.5 36.2 3:00 AM 6/22/22 43.0 60.1 36.4 4:00 AM 6/22/22 48.3 68.3 37.0 5:00 AM 6/22/22 47.7 64.3 37.7 6:00 AM 6/22/22 52.1 70.1 42.0 7:00 AM 6/22/22 53.4 67.8 42.4 8:00 AM 6/22/22 62.5 87.3 44.7 9:00 AM 6/22/22 61.8 88.4 45.2 10:00 AM 6/22/22 55.1 74.4 42.7 Source: Compiled by LSA Associates, Inc. (2022). dBA = A-weighted decibel Leq = equivalent continuous sound level Lmax = maximum instantaneous noise level Lmin = minimum measured sound level Noise Measurement Survey – 24 HR Project Number: ESL2201.32 Test Personnel: Kevin Nguyendo Project Name: Mission Villas Equipment: Spark 706RC (SN:18906) Site Number: LT-2 Date: 5/27/22 Time: From 11:00 a.m. To 11:00 a.m. Site Location: On the western corner bordering a power line near a fence next to a power Line tower and farm. Primary Noise Sources: Farming vehicles operating in the property to the west of the project Site. Comments: Chain link fence near monitor Photo: Long-Term (24-Hour) Noise Level Measurement Results at LT-2 Start Time Date Noise Level (dBA) Leq Lmax Lmin 11:00 AM 6/21/22 51.3 71.8 41.3 12:00 PM 6/21/22 48.6 60.9 40.9 1:00 PM 6/21/22 49.4 66.8 41.6 2:00 PM 6/21/22 49.3 60.3 41.6 3:00 PM 6/21/22 49.8 64.5 42.2 4:00 PM 6/21/22 48.3 62.7 40.9 5:00 PM 6/21/22 48.1 65.9 41.0 6:00 PM 6/21/22 47.6 64.0 41.3 7:00 PM 6/21/22 54.3 74.7 41.8 8:00 PM 6/21/22 46.4 65.9 41.3 9:00 PM 6/21/22 45.4 61.1 40.4 10:00 PM 6/21/22 43.9 60.9 40.3 11:00 PM 6/21/22 44.5 62.4 39.8 12:00 AM 6/22/22 41.9 51.6 39.1 1:00 AM 6/22/22 47.6 74.2 38.9 2:00 AM 6/22/22 42.3 62.9 39.5 3:00 AM 6/22/22 42.7 64.4 39.8 4:00 AM 6/22/22 47.5 67.2 40.3 5:00 AM 6/22/22 47.8 60.5 41.3 6:00 AM 6/22/22 50.7 68.4 43.7 7:00 AM 6/22/22 52.5 62.0 44.0 8:00 AM 6/22/22 58.2 78.9 44.6 9:00 AM 6/22/22 59.8 80.5 44.9 10:00 AM 6/22/22 55.9 77.4 43.8 Source: Compiled by LSA Associates, Inc. (2022). dBA = A-weighted decibel Leq = equivalent continuous sound level Lmax = maximum instantaneous noise level Lmin = minimum measured sound level Noise Measurement Survey Project Number: ESL2201.32 Test Personnel: Kevin Nguyendo Project Name: Mission Villas Equipment: Larson Davis 831 Site Location: Northeast corner of project site, south of 8612 Zerelda St. Primary Noise Sources: Someone watering garden, birds chirping and generally quiet. Measurement Results Atmospheric Conditions: Comments: File # 58. Site Number: ST-1 Date: 6/21/22 Time: From 11:14 a.m. To 11:34 a.m. dBA Leq 45.1 Lmax 52.8 Lmin 33.3 Lpeak 96.5 L2 49.9 L8 47.9 L25 45.9 L50 44.3 SEL Maximum Wind Velocity (mph) Average Wind Velocity (mph) 5 Temperature (F) 81 Relative Humidity (%) 36 Comments: Location Photo: NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» APPENDIX B CONSTRUCTION NOISE CALCULATIONS Phase: Demolition Lmax Leq Concrete Saw 1 90 20 50 0.5 90 83 Excavator 3 81 40 50 0.5 81 82 Dozer 2 82 40 50 0.5 82 81 Combined at 50 feet 91 87 Combined at Receptor 115 feet 84 80 Combined at Receptor 350 feet 74 70 Combined at Receptor 430 feet 72 68 Phase: Site Preparation Lmax Leq Dozer 3 82 40 50 0.5 82 83 Tractor 4 84 40 50 0.5 84 86 Combined at 50 feet 86 88 Combined at Receptor 110 feet 79 81 Combined at Receptor 360 feet 69 71 Combined at Receptor 430 feet 67 69 Phase: Grading Lmax Leq Excavator 1 81 40 50 0.5 81 77 Grader 1 85 40 50 0.5 85 81 Dozer 1 82 40 50 0.5 82 78 Tractor 3 84 40 50 0.5 84 85 Combined at 50 feet 89 87 Combined at Receptor 115 feet 82 80 Combined at Receptor 360 feet 72 70 Combined at Receptor 430 feet 71 69 Phase:Building Construstion Lmax Leq Crane 1 81 16 50 0.5 81 73 Man Lift 3 75 20 50 0.5 75 73 Generator 1 81 50 50 0.5 81 78 Tractor 3 84 40 50 0.5 84 85 Welder / Torch 1 74 40 50 0.5 74 70 Combined at 50 feet 87 86 Combined at Receptor 115 feet 80 79 Combined at Receptor 360 feet 70 69 Combined at Receptor 430 feet 69 67 Phase:Paving Lmax Leq Tractor 1 84 40 50 0.5 84 80 Drum Mixer 2 80 50 50 0.5 80 80 Paver 1 77 50 50 0.5 77 74 All Other Equipment > 5 HP 2 85 50 50 0.5 85 85 Roller 2 80 20 50 0.5 80 76 Combined at 50 feet 89 88 Combined at Receptor 115 feet 82 80 Combined at Receptor 360 feet 72 71 Combined at Receptor 430 feet 70 69 Phase:Architectural Coating Lmax Leq Compressor (air)1 78 40 50 0.5 78 74 Combined at 50 feet 78 74 Combined at Receptor 115 feet 71 67 Combined at Receptor 360 feet 61 57 Combined at Receptor 430 feet 59 55 Sources: RCNM 1- Percentage of time that a piece of equipment is operating at full power. dBA – A-weighted Decibels Lmax- Maximum Level Leq- Equivalent Level QuantityEquipment Equipment Noise Level (dBA)Ground Effects Distance to Receptor (ft) Usage Factor1 Reference (dBA) 50 ft LmaxQuantity Noise Level (dBA)Ground Effects Distance to Receptor (ft) Usage Factor1 Reference (dBA) 50 ft Lmax Noise Level (dBA) Construction Calculations Equipment Quantity Reference (dBA) 50 ft Lmax Usage Factor1 Distance to Receptor (ft) Ground Effects Noise Level (dBA) Equipment Quantity Reference (dBA) 50 ft Lmax Usage Factor1 Distance to Receptor (ft) Ground Effects Ground Effects Noise Level (dBA)Equipment Quantity Reference (dBA) 50 ft Lmax Usage Factor1 Distance to Receptor (ft) Noise Level (dBA)Equipment Quantity Reference (dBA) 50 ft Lmax Usage Factor1 Distance to Receptor (ft) Ground Effects Urban Planning ■ Due Diligence ■ Entitlements ■ CEQA/NEPA ■ Development Services ■ Management ■ Public Outreach 2355 Main Street, Suite 100 ■ Irvine, Calif. 92614 949.794.1180 ■ info@epdsolutions.com Date: September 8, 2022 Prepared by: Meghan Macias, TE To: Lily Valenzuela, Planning & Economic Development Manager, City of Rosemead Jana Robbins, Contract Traffic Engineer, City of Rosemead Site: 8601 Mission Drive Subject: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis This technical memorandum evaluates the trip generation and need to prepare a level of service (LOS) or vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis for the proposed 8601 Mission Drive Project. The project is located on Mission Drive east of Walnut Grove Avenue in the City of Rosemead. This memo will evaluate the project using the attached City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines for VMT and LOS Assessment. Project Description The project proposes to construct 29 single family dwelling units and eight townhome dwelling units. Access to the project would be provided by one driveway on Mission Drive. The project vicinity map is shown in Figure 1 and the project site plan is shown in Figure 2. Project Trip Generation and LOS Analysis Screening The project trip generation was prepared using trip rates for Single-Family Detached Housing (Land Use Code 210) and Multifamily Housing Low Rise (Land Use Code 220) from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)1. Table 1 presents the trip generation estimate for the proposed project. As shown in Table 1, the project is forecast to generate 327 daily trips, including 23 trips during the AM peak hour and 31 trips during the PM peak hour. Generally, a LOS analysis may be required if a project generates over 50 peak hour trips. The Project generates 23 AM peak hour trips and 31 PM peak hour trips; therefore, LOS analysis is not warranted for the project as the peak hour trip generation is minimal. VMT Screening Analysis Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed by Governor Brown in 2013 and required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to amend the CEQA Guidelines to provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating Transportation impacts. SB 743 specified that the new criteria should promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks and a diversity of land uses. The bill also specified that delay-based level of service could no longer be considered an indicator of a significant impact on the environment. In response, Section 15064.3 was added to the CEQA Guidelines beginning January 1, 2019. Section 15064.3 - Determining the Significance of Transportation Impacts states that Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts and provides lead agencies with the discretion to choose the most appropriate methodology and thresholds for evaluating VMT. City of Rosemead VMT Screening The City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines provides VMT screening thresholds to identify projects that would be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT and therefore could be screened out 1 Trip Generation, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). 2021. 8601 Mission Drive Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis 2 | P a g e from further analysis. If a project meets one of the following criteria, then the VMT impact of the project would be considered less than significant and no further analysis of VMT would be required: 1. The project is in a Transit Priority Area (TPA). 2. The project is in a low VMT area. 3. The project proposes one of the following local-serving land uses: o Local-serving retail less than 50,000 sf in size, including: ▪ Gas stations ▪ Banks ▪ Restaurants ▪ Shopping Center o Local serving K-12 school o Local park o Daycare centers o Local-serving hotel (e.g., non-destination hotel) o Student housing projects on or adjacent to a college campus o Local-serving assembly use (places of worship, community organizations) o Community institutions (public libraries, fire stations, local government) o Affordable, supportive, or transitional housing o Assisted living facilities o Senior housing (as defined by Housing and Urban Development) o Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the RTP/SCS (Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy) o Project generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips. This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials: ▪ 11 single family housing units ▪ 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units ▪ 10,000 SF of office ▪ 15,000 SF of light industrial ▪ 63,000 SF of warehousing ▪ 79,000 SF of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse o Public parking garages and public parking lots The applicability of each criterion to the project is discussed below. Screening Criteria 1 – TPA: According to the City’s guidelines, projects within one-half mile of an existing or planned major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor may be presumed to have a less than significant impact. The project is not located in a TPA; therefore, the project does not satisfy Screening Criteria 1 - TPA. Screening Criteria 2 – Low VMT Area: The City’s guidelines define low VMT areas as traffic analysis zones (TAZs) with a total daily VMT/Service Population (employment plus population) that is 15% less than the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) baseline. If the proposed project is residential, the project is considered “screened out” if it is located within the Low VMT areas of the “PA/Residential Home- Based VMT per Capita”. Alternatively, if the predominant land uses in the vicinity are nominally of the same type as the proposed project and the proposed project is reasonably expected to generate similar VMT as the existing land uses, the project is considered screened out if it is in the low VMT area for the “Total Daily VMT per Service Population”. The project proposes 29 single family dwelling units and eight townhome dwelling units. As shown on Figure 3, the project is surrounded by other residential uses, including single family and multifamily residential. As stated in the City’s guidelines, projects that are located in areas with predominately similar land uses can 8601 Mission Drive Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis 3 | P a g e utilize the SGVCOG screening tool. Therefore, the SGVCOG screening tool is appropriate to use for the project. As shown in the attached SGVCOG screening analysis, the project is in a low VMT area; therefore, the project would meet Screening Criteria 2 – Low VMT Area. Screening Criteria 3 – Land Use: The project proposes to construct 29 single family housing units and eight townhome housing units, which is above the 11 single family housing unit threshold and would not meet the local serving or low trip generating land use criteria. Therefore, the project would not meet Screening Criteria 3 – Land Use. Summary As shown in Table 1, the project is forecast to generate 349 daily trips, including 26 trips during the AM peak hour and 35 trips during the PM peak hour. The project trip generation would not warrant evaluation of the LOS as the project would generate fewer than 50 peak hour trips. The project was evaluated using the City of Rosemead VMT screening thresholds to determine if the project would require a VMT analysis. The project would meet the City’s screening criteria for Low VMT Area; therefore, the project VMT impacts would be considered less than significant and further analysis of VMT would not be required. If you have any questions about this information, please contact me at (949) 794-1186 or meghan@epdsolutions.com. 8601 Mission Drive Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis 4 | P a g e Figure 1: Vicinity Map 8601 Mission Drive Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis 5 | P a g e Figure 2: Project Site Plan 8601 Mission Drive Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis 6 | P a g e Figure 3: Surrounding Land Uses 8601 Mission Drive Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis 7 | P a g e Table 1: Project Trip Generation Land Use Daily In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rates Single-Family Detached Housing DU 9.43 0.18 0.52 0.70 0.59 0.35 0.94 Multifamily Housing (Low Rise)DU 6.74 0.10 0.30 0.40 0.32 0.19 0.51 Project Trip Generation 8601 Mission Drive SF 29 DU 273 5 15 20 17 10 27 8601 Mission Drive TH 8 DU 54 1 2 3 3 1 4 Total Trip Generation 327 6 17 23 20 11 31 DU = Dwelling Units 2 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021. Land Use Code 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low Rise) Not Close to Transit. 1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021. Land Use Code 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing. AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Units 8601 Mission Drive Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis 8 | P a g e ATTACHMENT A – CITY OF ROSEMEAD TRANSPORTATION STUDY GUIDELINES FOR VMT AND LOS ASSESSMENT 1493504.1 City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment October 2020 City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 2 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Background Information .................................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose of Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines ....................................................................... 4 Application of Guidelines ................................................................................................................................. 5 Organization Guidelines .................................................................................................................................. 6 Non-CEQA Transportation Assessment 7 Level of Service Analysis Procedure ............................................................................................................. 7 On-Site Parking Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 10 Access and Circulation Analysis .................................................................................................................. 11 CEQA Transportation Assessment - VMT Analysis 12 VMT Analysis Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 12 CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds .................................................................................................................... 18 VMT Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................. 18 CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis 20 Transportation Impact Study Format 21 Attachments 23 Attachment A: VMT Analysis Flowchart ................................................................................................... 23 Attachment B: SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool User Guide ........................................................... 24 Attachment C: Detailed VMT Forecasting Information ..................................................................... 25 Attachment D: VMT Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................. 28 Attachment D: VMT Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................. 28 City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 3 Introduction These guidelines describe the transportation analysis requirements for land development, roadway projects, and specific plans in the City of Rosemead. Guidelines are provided for evaluating a project’s environmental transportation impacts and effects on the local transportation system. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide guidance on how to prepare transportation studies in the City of Rosemead in conformance with all applicable City and State regulations. Background Information Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), signed by the Governor in 2013, has changed the way transportation impacts are identified. Specifically, the legislation directed the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to look at different metrics for identifying transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Final OPR guidelines were released in December 2018 and identified Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the preferred metric moving forward. The Natural Resources Agency completed the rule making process to modify the CEQA guidelines in December of 2018. The CEQA Guidelines identify that, by July 1, 2020 all lead agencies must use VMT as the new transportation metric for identifying transportation impacts for land use and transportation projects. In anticipation of the change to VMT, the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) undertook the SGVCOG SB 743 Implementation Study to assist with answering important implementation questions about the methodology, thresholds, and mitigation approaches for VMT impact analysis in its member agencies. The study includes the following main components. • Analysis Methodologies Memorandum – Identification of potential thresholds that can be considered when establishing thresholds of significance for VMT assessment and recommendations of analysis methodologies for VMT impact screening and analysis • Mitigation Memorandum – Types of mitigation that can be considered for VMT mitigation • VMT Assessment Tool – A web-based tool that can be used for VMT screening and mitigation recommendation The City of Rosemead utilized the information produced through the Implementation Study to adopt a methodology and significance thresholds for use in CEQA compliance. As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) below, lead agencies are encouraged to formally adopt their significance thresholds and this is a key part of the SB 743 implementation process. (b) Each public agency is encouraged to develop and publish thresholds of significance that the agency uses in the determination of the significance of environmental effects. Thresholds of significance to be adopted for general use as part of the lead agency’s environmental review process must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation, and developed through a public review process and be supported by substantial evidence. Lead agencies may also use thresholds on a case-by-case basis as provided in Section 15064(b)(2). City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 4 The City has produced these Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to outline the specific steps for complying with the new CEQA expectations for VMT analysis and the applicable general plan consistency requirements related to Level of Service (LOS). It should be noted that CEQA requirements change as the CEQA Guidelines are periodically updated and/or legal opinions are rendered that change how analysis is completed. As such, the City may continually review the guidelines for applicability and consultants should contact the City to ensure that they are applying the City’s most recent guidelines for project impact assessment. CEQA Changes A key element of the changes brought about by SB 743 is the elimination of auto delay, LOS, and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant environmental impacts. This change is intended to assist in balancing the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related to infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. SB 743 includes amendments to current congestion management law that allows cities and counties to effectively opt-out of the LOS standards that would otherwise apply in areas where Congestion Management Plans (CMPs) are still used. Further, SB 743 required OPR to update the CEQA Guidelines and establish criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts. In December 2018, OPR released their final recommended guidelines based on feedback from the public, public agencies, and various organizations and individuals. OPR recommended VMT as the most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts for land use projects and land use plans. For transportation projects, lead agencies may select their own preferred metric but must be prepared to support their decision with substantial evidence that complies with CEQA expectations. SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS outside of CEQA review for other transportation planning or analysis purposes (i.e., general plans, impact fee programs, corridor studies, congestion mitigation, or ongoing network monitoring). Level of Service Policy The Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan has established Policy goal 1.3 which states that every feasible effort should be made to provide LOS D operations or better at intersections. The LOS standards apply to discretionary approvals of new land use and transportation projects. Therefore, these guidelines also include instructions for vehicle LOS analysis consistent with City requirements. Purpose of Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines State and Federal laws require the correlation of Land Use Element building intensities in a General Plan with the Circulation Element capacity. A TIA is required by the City so that the impact of land City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 5 use proposals on the existing and future circulation system can be adequately assessed and to ensure that CEQA and Congestion Management Program laws and guidelines are met. The following TIA Guidelines identify CEQA based requirements and non-CEQA based requirements intended for any person or entity who is proposing development in the City and should be used in coordination with the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines and Municipal Code to guide the development review process. For the past several decades, the preparation of a TIA was integrated into the CEQA process, in which the TIA was used primarily to analyze a project’s impacts using intersection and/or roadway segment LOS. However, with the passage of SB 743, changes to the TIA process are necessary. Specifically, a TIA may be needed as a stand-alone document which is a requirement of project approval and will include information for the decision makers that is not required as part of the CEQA process. The purpose of these TIA guidelines is to provide general instructions for analyzing the potential transportation impacts of proposed development projects. These guidelines present the recommended format and methodology that should generally be utilized in the preparation of TIA’s. Application of Guidelines An applicant seeking project approval will submit the proposed project to the City with a planning and land use application. After a preliminary review of the project by City Staff, the applicant will be notified by the project planner as to whether or not a Level of Service based TIA or a Focused Traffic Analysis is required. If a project is not eligible for project screening and is required to complete a Level of Service based TIA, then the TIA should consider changes in both LOS and VMT. A TIA which includes LOS analysis may be required for a proposed project when the trips generated by a proposed development will add more than 50 project trips during either the AM or PM peak hours to any signalized intersection. The project study area will be determined by City staff during preliminary application review. Furthermore, a TIA or Focused Traffic Analysis must include a VMT assessment for a proposed project that does NOT satisfy one or more of the following project screening criteria: • Transit Priority Areas Screening • Low VMT-generating Areas Screening • Project Type Screening See Section, “CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis” for details on this screening criteria. Projects may be screened from VMT analysis and require level-of-service analysis, or vice-versa. In cases where insufficient information is available to make a preliminary assessment of a proposal’s effect on traffic, the City shall determine, at its discretion, whether a TIA will be required. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 6 Organization Guidelines This document is organized to provide background information, assessment for congestion management/General Plan Consistency (e.g. LOS analysis), and CEQA assessment (e.g. VMT analysis). The following sections are included: • Introduction • Non-CEQA Transportation Assessment • CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis • CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis • Transportation Impact Analysis Format City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 7 Non-CEQA Transportation Assessment Level of Service Analysis Procedure Traffic analysis should be prepared under the direction and/or by a registered traffic engineer, registered civil engineer, or qualified transportation planner. To establish a mutually agreeable scope of work for the traffic analysis, the analyst and project applicant should consult with Planning Department staff and Public Works staff to identify study area, assumptions, and methodologies of the traffic analysis. All assumptions and methodologies of the LOS analysis are subject to review and approval of City staff. Traffic Counts The traffic analysis should not use any traffic counts that are more than two years old without approval of City staff. If traffic counts taken within the last two years are not available, then new traffic counts should be collected by a qualified data collection firm. Turning movement data at the study intersections should be collected in 15-minute intervals during the hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM, unless City Staff specifies other hours (e.g., for a signal warrant determination, school traffic or weekend analysis). Unless otherwise required, all traffic counts should generally be conducted when local schools or colleges are in session, on days of good weather, on Tuesdays through Thursdays during non-Summer months, and should avoid being taken on weeks with a holiday. Trip Generation The City will accept the trip generation rate of the latest edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. In addition, with City approval, analysis for a proposed project with trip generation rates not provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, may use rates from other agencies or locally approved studies for specific land uses or driveway counts at similar facilities with the same characteristics of the proposed project. Documentation supporting the use of these trip generation rates will be required. The traffic analysis should include justification for trip generation credits such as existing uses, transit, and internal capture. The pass-by traffic credit should be calculated based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineer data or city approved special studies. Analysis at project driveways will require the assumption of full project trips prior to pass-by credits. Trip Distribution and Assignment Documentation should be provided for the trip distribution and assignment for vehicle trips to and from the site along specific roadways that will be utilized by project generated traffic. The basic methodology and assumptions used to develop trip distribution and assignments must be clearly City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 8 stated and approved by City staff. The basis for trip distribution should consider any available demographic or market data in the area as well as the project’s location relative to the regional roadway system. The trip assignment for the project should be based on existing and projected travel patterns and the future roadway network and its travel time characteristics. Traffic Forecasts The traffic analysis should include the total traffic which is expected to occur at buildout of the proposed project. This means that the analyst preparing the transportation study should include all the cumulative effects of the project. The analyst may obtain the ambient growth rate in the project vicinity from the City’s General Plan, the latest version of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Travel Demand Model or another appropriate sub-area travel demand model. Projects which have been approved or planned, but not built in the vicinity of the proposed project should be verified as included in the analysis and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Analysis Methodologies The City uses the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to evaluate AM and PM peak hour LOS at signalized intersections. The latest version of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology will be used to evaluate the AM and PM peak hour LOS at unsignalized intersections. The peak hour will be identified as the highest one-hour period in both AM and PM counted periods, as determined by four consecutive 15-minute count intervals. The following parameters should be used in determining the LOS at the intersections within the City. ICU Methodology (signalized intersections) • A minimum clearance interval of 0.10 of green time. • Lane capacities of 1,800 per hour per lane for through and turn lanes. • Lane capacities of 3,240 per hour for dual turn lanes HCM Methodology (unsignalized intersections) • A peak hour factor (PHF) based on observed conditions shall be used for existing conditions. • A PHF of 0.95 shall be used for future conditions. Pedestrian activity should be considered on a case by case basis using reductions in saturation flow rates for affected lanes as determined by sound engineering judgement. The HCM is the best source of guidance for assessment of pedestrian influences on flow rates. Table 1 summarizes the range of values and LOS designations. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 9 Table 1: Level of Service Criteria LOS LOS Criteria Description Signalized Intersection (v/c) Unsignalized Intersection (delay) A ≤0.600 ≤10.0 EXCELLENT. Operations with very low delay and most vehicles do not stop. B >0.600 and ≤0.700 >10.0 and ≤15.0 VERY GOOD. Operations with good progression but with some restricted movements. C >0.700 and ≤0.800 >15.0 and ≤25.0 GOOD. Operations where a significant number of vehicles are stopping with some backup and light congestion. D >0.800 and ≤0.900 >25.0 and ≤35.0 FAIR. Operations where congestion is noticeable, longer delays occur, and many vehicles stop. The proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. E >0.900 and ≤1.000 >35.0 and ≤50.0 POOR. Operations where there is high delay, extensive queueing, and poor progression. F >1.000 >50.0 FAILURE. Operations that are unacceptable to most drivers, when the arrival rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Scenarios The following identifies the analysis scenarios that should be evaluated for LOS analysis (at the discretion of City staff). • Existing Conditions: Existing traffic conditions analysis based on current traffic data, typically collected within the previous 2-year period. • Existing plus Project: Existing traffic conditions plus traffic generated by the proposed project. • Opening Year: Existing traffic conditions plus ambient growth and traffic from all the development within the study area for which an application has been submitted (“pending projects”), or that have been approved but not yet constructed. There may be multiple opening years if the project is proposed in phases. • Opening Year plus Project: Traffic conditions of existing plus ambient growth and approved and pending developments, plus traffic generated by the proposed project. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 10 Projects that are to be constructed in more than one phase will require interim year future analysis to address each phase of the development and its associated traffic effects. The year(s) to be analyzed will coincide with the scheduled phasing and will be approved by City staff. A table is to be included which identifies the forecast LOS for each intersection within the defined study area. This summary table shall present LOS for all scenarios evaluated-including improvements. Transportation Effects The acceptable LOS for intersections in the City is D or better as established in the City’s General Plan. Any intersection operating at a LOS of E or F is considered deficient. The project-related increase in volume-to-capacity (V/C) is equal to or greater than 0.020 at an intersection that degrades from acceptable operations (LOS D or better) to unacceptable operations (LOS E or F). For signalized intersections, the City’s non-CEQA thresholds for volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) are met if the following is met, and the City at its discretion may require improvements or other strategies to reduce the V/C ratio to acceptable levels: • The project-related increase in V/C is equal to or greater than 0.020 at an intersection that is already operating at LOS E or F. For unsignalized intersections, the City’s non-CEQA thresholds for Level of Service (LOS) are met if both of the following conditions are met, and the City at its discretion may require improvements or other strategies to reduce the Level of Service (LOS) to acceptable levels: • The addition of project traffic to an intersection results in the degradation of overall intersection operations from acceptable operations (LOS D or better) to unacceptable operations (LOS E or F). • The project-related increase in traffic contributes 10 percent or more to the total peak hour volume at an intersection that is already operating at LOS E or F. On-Site Parking Analysis This analysis will address the on-site parking supply versus parking required per City code. If the proposed development is of mixed-use type, a table should be included presenting each land use, its size, and the code parking requirement. This table should clearly indicate how the code parking City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 11 was calculated and include the proposed on-site parking supply together with the resultant surplus or deficit from code requirements. Should the on-site parking supply be less than required by the City code, a detailed explanation justifying a reduction to the code requirement must be included. Note that this does not eliminate the need for any zoning code variance. Shared parking evaluations will be considered when appropriate. Access and Circulation Analysis The project’s effect on access points and on-site circulation shall be analyzed. The analysis shall, as appropriate, include the following: • Number of access points proposed for the project site. • If a project is proposing full access at project driveways, then it must be demonstrated that striping and lane widths on adjacent streets will allow for full movements in and out. • Spacing between driveways and intersections. • Potential signalization of driveways. • On-site stacking distance. (Including uses with a drive thru.) • If project includes a restaurant with a drive-thru, a queueing analysis may be required addressing available on-site stacking and demonstrate that no drive thru stacking will spill onto adjacent public streets. • Shared access. • Turn conflicts/restrictions. • Adequate sight distance at project driveways. • Driveway improvements. • Pedestrian connections. • Show truck turning templates for truck deliveries and trash trucks on site. • If the project involves large trucks (industrial, manufacturing, warehouse use), then a truck turning template will be required at each project driveway showing truck paths to docking and delivery zones. • Any other operational characteristics (as identified by City staff). If the proposed project is a residential or commercial use with privacy gates, the applicant shall provide a stacking analysis for review and approval. The adequacy of the interface with the arterial network will need to be demonstrated and necessary improvements to adjacent intersections may be required. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 12 CEQA Transportation Assessment - VMT Analysis VMT Analysis Methodology For purposes of SB 743 compliance, a VMT analysis should be conducted for land development projects subject to CEQA and would apply to projects that have the potential to increase the baseline VMT per service population (e.g. population plus employment) for the City. Normalizing VMT per service population (e.g. creating a rate by dividing VMT by service population) provides a transportation efficiency metric that the analysis is based on. All assumptions and methodologies of the VMT analysis are subject to review and approval by the City Staff. A flowchart of the VMT analysis process is attached to these guidelines. See Attachment A, “VMT Analysis Flowchart”. A web-based tool that is included with this implementation study to assist with VMT assessment screening and mitigation recommendations. A user guide for use of this tool is attached to these guidelines. See Attachment B, “SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool Users Guide.” Project Screening There are three types of screening that may be applied to effectively screen projects from project- level assessment. These screening steps are summarized below: Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening Projects located within a TPA1 may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project: 1. Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75; 2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the City; 1 A TPA is defined as a half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor per the definitions below. Public Resources Code § 21099(a)(7) Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 - ‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 - For purposes of this section, a ‘high-quality transit corridor’ means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 13 3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the lead agency, with input from the Southern California Association of Governments [SCAG]); or 4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units. To identify if the project is in a TPA, the analyst may review TPA map included in the SGVCOG VMT assessment tool. Additionally, the analyst should confirm with all local transit providers that no recent changes in transit service have occurred in the project area (e.g. addition or removal of transit lines, addition or removal of transit stops, or changes to service frequency). Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other employment-related and mixed-use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area. • If the proposed project is residential, the project is considered “screened out”, if it is located within the Low VMT areas of the “PA/Residential Home-Based VMT per Capita”. Alternatively, if the predominant land uses in the vicinity are nominally of the same type as the proposed project and the proposed project is reasonably expected to generate similar VMT as the existing land uses, the project is considered screened out if it is in the low VMT area for the “Total Daily VMT per Service Population”. • If the proposed project is office, commercial or industrial, the project is considered “screened out”, if it is located within the Low VMT areas of the “PA/Daily Home-Based Work VMT per Employee”. Alternatively, if the predominant land uses in the vicinity are nominally of the same type as the proposed project and the proposed project is reasonably expected to generate similar VMT as the existing land uses, the project is considered screened out if it is in the low VMT area for the “Total Daily VMT Service per Population”. • If the proposed project is retail, the project is considered “screened out” if it is located within the low VMT areas of the “Total Daily VMT per Service Population”. • If the proposed project is a mixed-use development, all components of the project should be analyzed against the low VMT maps for either the dominant project land use (if applicable) or for each individual land use (if there is no dominant project land use). Reductions in VMT may be applied to account for internal trips that would occur within the project site. The project must be analyzed as a whole and all elements must screen out to qualify for Low VMT screening. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 14 For this screening, the SCAG travel forecasting model was used to measure VMT performance for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). TAZs are geographic polygons similar to Census block groups used to represent areas of homogenous travel behavior. Total daily VMT per service population was estimated for each TAZ. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project land uses would alter the existing built environment in such a way as to increase the rate or length of vehicle trips. The project applicant should document whether or not any increase to the trip generation rate or length of vehicle trips is expected. To identify if the project is in a low VMT-generating area, the analyst should use the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool at: https://apps.fehrandpeers.com/SGVCOGVMT/. There are two VMT Metrics for each Land Use Type built into the tool as shown in the figure below: Either one of these two options may be used to screen a project. To use the tool for a proposed project, the land use type must be either an existing or future land use within the Tier 1 Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) for Total VMT per Service Population, or within the Tier 2 TAZ for Home-based VMT per capita or Home-based Work VMT per employee. Additionally, if using the Total VMT per Service Population metric, the analyst must verify that the project is consistent with the existing land use (i.e. if the project is proposing housing, there should be existing housing within that TAZ) and use professional judgment that there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise misrepresent utilizing the data from the VMT Tool. Step 3: Project Type Screening Some project types have been identified as having the presumption of a less than significant impact. The following uses can be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature: • Local serving retail (retail establishments less than 50,000 square feet in size), including: o Gas stations o Gas Stations o Banks o Restaurants o Shopping Center • Local-serving K-12 schools City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 15 • Local parks • Day care centers • Local-serving hotels (e.g. non-destination hotels) • Student housing projects on or adjacent to a college campus • Local-serving assembly uses (places of worship, community organizations) • Community institutions (public libraries, fire stations, local government) • Affordable, supportive, or transitional housing • Assisted living facilities • Senior housing (as defined by HUD) • Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the RTP/SCS (Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy) • Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips2,3This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials: o 11 single family housing units o 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units o 10,000 sq. ft. of office o 15,000 sq. ft. of light industrial4 o 63,000 sq. ft. of warehousing3 o 79,000 sq. ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse3 • Public parking garages and public parking lots Local serving retail projects with a total square footage less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel. Any project that uses the designation of “local-serving” should be able to demonstrate that its users (employees, customers, visitors) would be existing within the community. The project would not generate new “demand” for the project land uses but would meet the existing 2 Note that a redevelopment project replacing an existing use would estimate the net increase in trips above trips what already exists. 3 This threshold ties directly to the OPR technical advisory and notes that CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).) Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract an additional 110-124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact. 4 This number was estimated using rates from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual. Some industrial and warehousing tenants may generate traffic differently than what is documented in ITE. In these cases, documentation of the project generating less than 110 daily trips will be required for review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 16 demand that would shorten the distance existing residents, employees, customers, or visitors would need to travel. VMT Assessment for Non-Screened Development Projects not screened through the steps above should complete VMT analysis and forecasting through the SCAG model, appropriate sub-area model, or VMT analysis tool to determine if they have a significant VMT impact. This analysis should include ‘project generated VMT’ for the project TAZ (or TAZs) and ‘project effect on VMT’ estimates under the scenarios below. Project generated VMT shall include the VMT generated by the site compared back to the CEQA threshold of significance. The project effect on VMT is the link based VMT for a geographic region which is more appropriate to review to evaluate how these developments change travel behavior in the region. • Baseline conditions: This data is available from the SCAG model or appropriate sub-area model approved by the City Staff. This data is also available in the SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool. Baseline conditions typically represent the year of the Notice of Preparation (NOP). Interpolation between the base and future year model will be required to identify the VMT representative of the baseline year. • Baseline plus Project: The project land use would be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created to contain the project land uses. A full base year model run would be performed and VMT changes would be isolated for the project TAZ and across the full model network. The model output must include reasonableness checks of the production and attraction balancing to ensure the project effect is accurately captured. These reasonableness checks are subject to City Staff’s review. If this scenario results in a less-than-significant impact, then additional cumulative scenario analysis may not be required (more information about this outcome can be found in the Thresholds Evaluation discussion later in this chapter). The SGVCOG VMT assessment tool provides an estimate of the Baseline plus project conditions. This data could be presented in lieu of results from the full model run. However, it is recommended that a base year plus project run be performed as a check for reasonableness and consistency with the cumulative year results. • Cumulative no Project: This data is available from the SCAG model or appropriate sub-area model approved by the City Staff. • Cumulative plus project: City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 17 The project land use would either be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created to contain the project land uses. The addition of project land uses should be accompanied by a reallocation of a similar amount of land use from other TAZs; especially if the proposed project is significant in size such that it would change other future developments. Land use projects are often represented in the assumed growth of the cumulative year population and employment. It may be appropriate to remove land use growth that represents a project from the cumulative year model to represent the cumulative no project scenario If project land uses are simply added to the cumulative no project scenario, then the analysis should reflect this limitation in the methodology and acknowledge that the analysis may overestimate the project’s effect on VMT. The model output should include total VMT, which includes all vehicle trips and trip purposes, and VMT per service population. Total VMT (by speed bin) is needed as an input for air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), and energy impact analysis while total VMT per service population is recommended for transportation impact analysis5. The baseline and cumulative “plus project” scenarios noted above will summarize project generated VMT per service population and comparing it back to the appropriate benchmark noted in the thresholds of significance. The cumulative “plus project” scenario noted above will summarize the project effect on VMT, comparing how the project changes VMT on the network looking at citywide VMT per service population comparing it to the no project condition. Project-generated VMT should be extracted from the travel demand forecasting model using the origin-destination trip matrix and should multiply that matrix by the final assignment skims. The project-effect on VMT should be estimated using the City boundary6 and extracting the total link- level VMT for both the no project and with project condition. The TAZ identification numbers within the study area shall be included in the report. In some cases, it may be appropriate to extract the Project-generated VMT using the production-attraction trip matrix. This may be appropriate when a project is entirely composed of retail or office uses, and there is a need to isolate the home-based-work (HBW) VMT for the purposes of isolating commute VMT. The City should evaluate the appropriate methodology based on the project land use types and context. A detailed description of this process is attached to these guidelines. See Attachment C, “Detailed VMT Forecasting Information”. 5 The City has selected VMT per service population for its impact threshold. However, the City will allow for use of VMT to be isolated by trip purpose with review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 6 Note – for projects near the City boundary, a different boundary may be more applicable to make sure that VMT effects are not artificially truncated at the City boundary. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 18 CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds VMT Impacts VMT thresholds provided below are to be applied to determine potential project generated VMT impacts and project’s effect on VMT impacts. A project would result in a significant project generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are satisfied4: 1. The baseline project generated VMT per service population exceeds the 15% below the SGVCOG baseline VMT per service population, or 2. The cumulative project generated VMT per service population exceeds 15% below the SGVCOG baseline VMT per service population The project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if it resulted in the following condition being satisfied: 1. The cumulative link-level boundary Citywide VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition. Please note that the cumulative no project should reflect the adopted RTP/SCS; as such, if a project is consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS, then the cumulative impacts (project effect on VMT) shall be considered less than significant subject to consideration of other substantial evidence. VMT Mitigation Measures The following mitigation strategies are available to reduce VMT impacts: 1. Modify the project’s-built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project. 2. Implement transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce VMT generated by the project. 3. Participate in a VMT fee program and/or VMT mitigation exchange/banking program (if available) to reduce VMT from the project or other land uses to achieve acceptable levels. As part of the Implementation Study, key TDM measures that are appropriate to the region were identified. Measures appropriate for most of the City are summarized in a table attached to these guidelines. See Attachment D, “VMT Mitigation Strategies”. VMT reductions should be evaluated as part of the VMT impact analysis using state-of-the-practice methodologies recognizing that many of the TDM strategies are dependent on building tenant performance over time. As such, actual VMT reduction cannot be reliably predicted and monitoring may be necessary to gauge performance related to mitigation expectations. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 19 When a Project is found to have a significant impact under CEQA, the City requires developers and the business community to assist in reducing peak hour and total vehicular trips by implementing Transportation Demand Management Plans (TDMs). The potential of a proposed project to reduce VMT through the use of a TDM plan should be addressed in the traffic study. If a TDM plan is proposed as a mitigation measure for a project, and the traffic study attributes a reduction in peak and total traffic to the TDM plan, the following information must be provided: 1. A detailed description of the major components of the TDM plan and how it would be implemented and maintained on a continuing basis. 2. Case studies or empirical data that supports the anticipated reduction of traffic attributed to the TDM plan. 3. Additional Volume/Capacity ratio calculations that illustrate the circulation benefits of the TDM plan. 4. Enforcement Measures – how it will be monitored and enforced. 5. How it complies with the South Coast Air Quality Management District Regulations. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 20 CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis Potential impacts to public transit, pedestrian facilities and travel, and bicycle facilities and travel can be evaluated using the following criteria: • A significant impact occurs if the project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities. Therefore, the TIA should evaluate whether a project is consistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding active transportation or public transit facilities, or otherwise increases or decreases the performance or safety of such facilities and make a determination as to whether it has the potential to conflict with existing or proposed facilities supporting these travel modes. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 21 Transportation Impact Study Format Each TIA submitted to the City should contain each of the following elements unless the topic is not applicable. However, items omitted there as “not applicable” must first be approved by the City. 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 3. Project Description and Location 4. Methodology and Thresholds 5. LOS Analysis 6. On-site Parking, Access, and Circulation Analysis 7. Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis 8. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis 9. Appendix 1. Executive Summary This portion of the report shall present factual and concise information relative to the major issues identified in the report. The Executive Summary shall include a brief overview of the project, a short discussion of the project’s traffic generation potential, the expected VMT impacts of the project, and a summary of mitigation measures. It should also summarize any deficiencies in roadway LOS and the corresponding proposed improvements. 2. Introduction The introduction of the report shall include a detailed description of study procedures, a general overview of the proposed project site and study area boundaries, existing and proposed site uses, and existing and proposed roadways and intersections within the defined study area (defined study area to be determined by the City). Exhibits required for this section shall include a regional map showing the project vicinity and a site layout map. 3. Project Description and Location This section shall expand on information presented in the introduction and shall provide a detailed development scenario and specific project location. Exhibits in this section shall include, at a minimum, a clear illustration of the project in terms of a site plan, its density, adjacent roadways, on-site parking supply, proposed traffic circulation within the project, gross square footage, number of rooms/units, and other descriptors as appropriate. 4. Methodology and Thresholds Identify the methodology used to calculate LOS and VMT. Include the criteria used for screening projects from project-level VMT analysis, if applicable. Identify the impact threshold for VMT, and the City’s LOS standards for roadways and intersections. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 22 5. LOS Analysis This should include the Traffic Generation Forecast, Traffic Distribution and Assignment, Traffic Analysis, and identify required improvements described about in “Level of Service Analysis Procedure”. 6. On-site Parking, Access, and Circulation Analysis Refer to On-Site Parking Analysis section and Access and Circulation Analysis section. 7. Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis Refer to Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis section. 8. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis Present the Project VMT per service population for all analysis scenarios and the Project effect on VMT for all analysis scenarios. Data should be presented in tabular format. If the project meets the City’s VMT screening criteria, this should be documented. All VMT impacts should be identified in accordance with the VMT Impact Thresholds described above. Proposed VMT mitigation measures should be identified. 9. Appendix Detailed appendix material shall be supplied as part of the report. If the main report is too large to include an appendix, such material shall be provided under a separate and identifiable cover. Typical material in this regard includes VMT and TDM calculations, traffic counts, LOS calculation sheets, fully completed signal warrants, accident diagrams at high accident locations, sketches of proposed roadway improvements, and other information necessary for the City's review of the report. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 23 Attachments Attachment A: VMT Analysis Flowchart Step 1 Screening ProjectQuestions ProceduralFlowchart Step 3 Developing Mitigation Measures Step 2 VMT Assessment 1. Is the project in a Transit Priority Area? 2. Are the following requirements met? • Must have a total FAR greater than or equal to 0.75 • Cannot provide more parking than the City Municipal Code Requirement • Must be consistent with SCAG RTP/SCS • Cannot replace affordable units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units What is the project-level VMT and its effect on VMT assessment? Does the project have a less than significant impact? CAPCOA = California Air Pollution Control Officers Association FAR = Floor Area Ratio PA = Production-Attraction RTP = Regional Transportation Plan SCAG = Southern California Association of Governments SCS = Sustainable Communities Strategy SGVCOG = San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments TDM = Transportation Demand Management TPA = Transit Priority Area VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled What are the options to mitigate VMT impacts? Abbreviations 1. Is the project located in a low VMT area? 2. Are the following requirements met? • The project is composed of similar land use types and of a similar density to the land uses within the project TAZ • The project is assumed to generate VMT per person similar to those existing uses Steps Is the project a local-serving project as noted in the Project Type Screening project list in the Transportation Study Guidelines? These projects include but are not limited to: • Local serving K-12 schools • Local-serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet • Community and Religious Assembly Uses • Public Services • Affordable or supportive housing • Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips • Other projects as approved by the City Traffic Engineer Type A TPA Screening Type B Low VMT Area Screening Type C Project Type Screening Note: Review jurisdiction's thresholds of significance for definition of low VMT area. Note: VMT reductions associated with proposed TDM mitigation measures can be estimated with: • CAPCOA reduction equations • Use of OCTAM and the PA Methodology to isolate commute VMT • The SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool TDM module can be utilized to estimate VMT reduction potential associated with TDM measures *Please note that a Mitigation Bank or Mitigation Exchange program may not be readily available. Check with your local agency. Details for VMT Assessment are provided in Transportation Study Guidelines. Modify the project’s built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project Implement TDM measures to reduce VMT generated by the project Participate in Mitigation Bank or Mitigation Exchange to offset impact*MITIGATIONTDMPROJECT Note: If the project fulfills Type A, B or C screening, the project is presumed to result in a less-than-significant transportation impact. Note: If the project is not screened from assessment in Step 1, the project will require a full VMT assessment to disclose potential significant impacts. Use SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool Use latest version of the SCAG model or local subregional model to conduct VMT Assessment consistent with Procedural Notes on VMT Assessment on next page Process Complete Process Complete Process Complete Use SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool Decision Analytical process or procedural outcome SGVCOG VMT Assessment Flowchart NO NO NO YES YES YES Process Complete NOYES City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 24 Attachment B: SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool User Guide 1   SGVCOG VMT Tool:  Quick Start Guide  (August 18, 2020)  Led by the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) at the direction of 27 of the 30                                     member cities that constitute SGVCOG, this tool is an outcome of the VMT implementation process  whereby the participating cities adopted new significance thresholds for analyzing transportation  impacts pursuant to Senate Bill 743 (SB 743).  The tool covers the following SGVCOG cities:    Alhambra Industry Rosemead  Arcadia Irwindale San Dimas  Azusa La Canada Flintridge San Gabriel  Baldwin Park La Puente San Marino  Claremont Laverne Sierra Madre  Covina Monterey Park South El Monte  Diamond Bar Montebello Temple City  Duarte Monrovia Walnut  El Monte Pomona West Covina  The tool can be accessed at https://apps.fehrandpeers.com/SGVCOGVMT/. Each of the cities has  unique thresholds of significance, and the methodologies for VMT screening may vary slightly due to  the different development patterns and geographic location of each community.  Please coordinate  with the respective city when using this tool for development purposes.    WHAT DOES THIS TOOL DO?  The SGVCOG VMT Tool is designed to assist you in screening and estimating project‐generated VMT for  certain types of land use projects in the San Gabriel Valley and calculating VMT reductions associated  with certain VMT‐reducing measures. The tool is intended for use on four primary land uses:   Residential   Office   Industrial   Commercial (e.g. retail, restaurant, and entertainment uses)  The tool evaluates projects with one or a combination of these uses.      LIMITATIONS OF THE VMT EVALUATION TOOL  The VMT Evaluation Tool only covers some of the possible screening criteria that a city or county may  establish for land use project VMT analysis per California Senate Bill 743. The Tool is limited to providing  estimates based on data provided in the model, whereby if a proposed project is of a land use type that  is not reflected in the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) either now or in the future, the Tool is not capable of  estimating the VMT efficiency rate for that land use type.  Other land uses types, large, complex and/or  2   mixed‐use projects, or long‐range land use plans should be analyzed using the Boundary Method, which  requires running the SCAG RTP Model. Before making any decisions based on the information provided  by the VMT Evaluation Tool, it is recommended that you contact the city in which the proposed  development is located.     RUNNING THE VMT EVALUATION TOOL – 4 BASIC STEPS  The following are the four basic steps involved in running the VMT Evaluation Tool:  Page 1:  Select Project Area  Step 1: Jurisdiction  Using the drop‐down box, select the city where the project is located.  This is required.  Step 2: Select Parcel(s)  There are three ways to locate the parcels associated with a proposed project:  1. Type in the Assessor Parcel Number(s) (APN).  The APN requires a dash between each  grouping of numbers (XXXX‐XXX‐XXX).   2. Type in the Project Address; or,  3. Zoom into the map  To select the parcel, click on “Add”.      Page 2: Determine Screening Inputs   Project Information  o Project Name: Must type in a project name (required field) – max 250 characters  o Project Description: Required field – max 250 characters  o APNs: Auto‐populated from Page 1     3    Select Base Data: Auto‐populated   Analysis Methodology: Auto‐ populated    Select Baseline Year: The tool has  the capability of providing baseline  VMT between 2012 and 2040  pursuant to the 2016 SCAG RTP  Model.  To select a baseline year,  click on the timeline and slide the  point to the preferred baseline year.   VMT Metric Specification for Land  Use 1‐3: The tool is capable of  evaluating up to three land use types  per project.  The tool is also capable  of evaluating the difference in VMT  Metrics for one land use type.  For  the latter, select the same land use  type for Land Use 1 and Land Use 2  and select different VMT Metrics.   Land Use Type: Select  1) Residential, 2) Office, 3) Industrial, or 4) Commercial.     VMT Metric: Select Home‐based VMT per Capita/Home‐based VMT per Worker or Total VMT per  Service Population   Jurisdictional Average for Baseline: Pre‐set (based on City preferences)   Threshold: Pre‐set (based on City preferences)   Project Screening Only versus  Continue to VMT Reduction Factors:  Option to screen first without  VMT reductions. The tool provides a mechanism to return to this page and select reductions.      4      Page 4: Project Screening Results (without VMT Reduction Strategies)      Page 4 (VMT Screening Results): From this page with Project Screening Results, there is an option at the top  left of the page to “Edit Inputs”.  Click this to return to Page 3.  Page 3: Click on Continue to VMT Reduction Strategies to test VMT reduction strategies.  Details about the  VMT Reduction Strategies are provided in Appendix D of the Transportation Assessment Guidelines.  Page 4 (Land Use Info and VMT Reduction Strategies):  On this page, populate the project details.  Note that  the light blue “i" in a circle can be clicked on for additional information, as demonstrated below.       Project Land Use Information  o The left‐hand entry boxes contain up/down arrows for increasing/decreasing values, but by  clicking to the left of the up/down  arrows, you may also type in a value, as  shown below.  Please note that all  square‐footage values are calculated in  5   the tool in terms of one thousand square feet (KSF) so for a 6,000 square‐foot office, the field  would be populated with a “6”, as shown below.     VMT Reduction Strategies  o Select the desired VMT Reduction Strategies by first clicking the box next to the strategy. In  some cases, additional inputs will be required, such as the example below for Tier 3 Parking  (PK01 Limit Parking Supply)     A number of reduction strategies overlap with each other. For instance, a strategy may consist of a basket of measures which may overlap with some of the measures in another strategy. Therefore, the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool logic has been coded to reflect these dependencies, so that if one measure is chosen, other overlapping measures are not allowed. The dependencies in the tool are summarized below and are shown in the Tool by greying out certain reductions so that they cannot be selected. 6   If this strategy is chosen… This strategy is not allowed… PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 15 Travel behavior Change TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program TP 05 Implement CTR Program PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs TP 15 Behavioral Intervention TP 17 Vanpool Incentives TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out TP 10 Price Workplace Parking TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs TP 17 Vanpool Incentives TP 10 Price Workplace Parking TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet TP 17 Vanpool Incentives TP 15 Behavioral Intervention TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program TP 17 Vanpool Incentives TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 15 Behavioral Intervention  Project Screening Results (with VMT Reduction Strategies):  The results of the Project Screening are  summarized in this report.  The Tool does not screen based on 110‐daily trips.  Screening for this  factor must be completed outside of the tool using the ITE Trip Generation Manual.  This Tool screens  projects based on their location within a TPA and/or a Low VMT Area.  The Screening Results provides  the following information about these two screening criteria.    7   1. Transit Priority Area (TPA):  Page 1 of the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report       2. Low VMT Area: Page 2 of the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report provides details about the  VMT generation in the area of the proposed project.  The table in the figure below indicates  the Home‐based VMT per Employee Baseline (20.4), and the dark blue line indicated in the  bar chart (17.34) indicates the threshold of 15 percent below the Baseline.  The gray dotted  line in the bar chart indicates the maximum potential VMT reduction (16.22) that could be  available through the strategies in the tool.        READING THE REPORT & EXPORT FILES  The VMT Evaluation Tool produces two types of outputs: a formatted report, which shows up on the  Results screen and can be downloaded as a PDF file, and data tables including all the user‐provided  inputs and the back‐end data which can be downloaded as CSV files.  Key things to look for in the report / PDF:   Whether the project falls in proximity to transit (within ½  mile of a Major Transit Stop, or ½ mile of a stop along a High‐  Quality Transit Corridor as defined in state law):  Look for the ‘Inside TPA?’ question on Page 1 of the report.  8    Whether the project falls in a low‐VMT area (i.e., below the VMT threshold specified by the  city/town/county): Look for the ‘Low VMT Screening Analysis’ row on the Screening Results page(s) of  the report, starting on page 2. There will be Low‐VMT Screening results for each land use you select.  The CSV files are intended to help the user understand how the VMT reduction results were obtained; the  data in the files, along with the formulas in forthcoming User Manual, should help confirm the results.    TIPS FOR SUCCESS   Look for the “tool‐tips” across the tool to help understand fields where inputs are required.   The tool may take 1 ‐ 2 minutes to run a report; if it takes much longer, refresh and try again.   If you are running variations on the same site and project, use the back arrows in the upper‐left  of  the screen (such as  ) to go back, vary some inputs, and run the report again.   To start a completely new analysis while staying in the tool, use the button in the upper‐right of the  Results screen.    The tool is optimized for Chrome, Firefox, Edge or Safari on a Windows or Mac computer, although  you may also access it from a tablet or another browser. If you encounter unexpected issues, try  clearing your browser cache and cookies and running again.   Please fill out the short feedback form by clicking on the link in the upper‐right  of the tool. You may report errors, rate the tool, and offer suggestions for future improvements.    FOR MORE INFORMATION  SGVCOG will be providing further documentation of the VMT Evaluation Tool in Fall 2020, including a  User Manual and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) sheet.     If you have questions about the VMT Evaluation Tool, you may email j.hayes@fehrandpeers.com.   For any inquiries about how the tool may be applied in a land use review and approval process, please  contact staff at the city/town/county in which the project is located.  City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 25 Attachment C: Detailed VMT Forecasting Information City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 26 This section provides detailed VMT forecasting instructions for use with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Travel Demand Model. Please note that SCAG periodically updates the travel demand model and the latest version available should be utilized for VMT assessment in the City. The SCAGT travel demand model is a trip-based model that generates daily person trip-ends for each traffic analysis zone (TAZ or zone) across various trip purposes (Home-based-work, home- based-other, and non-home-based for example) based on population, household, and employment variables. This may create challenges for complying with the VMT guidance because trip generation is not directly tied to specific land use categories. The following methodology addresses this particular challenge among others. Production and attraction trip-ends are separately calculated for each zone, and generally: production trip-ends are generated by residential land uses and attraction trip-ends are generated by non-residential land uses. Focusing on residential and employment land uses, the first step to forecasting VMT requires translating the land use into model terms, the closest approximations are: • Residential: home-based production trips • Employment: home-based work attraction trips Note that this excludes all non-home-based trips. The challenges with computing VMT for these two types of trips in a trip-based model are 1) production and attraction trip-ends are not distinguishable after the productions/attractions (PA) to origins/destinations (OD) conversion process and 2) trip purposes are not maintained after the mode choice step. For these reasons, it not possible to use the VMT results from the standard vehicle assignment (even using a select zone re-assignment). A separate post-process must be developed to re-estimate VMT for each zone that includes trip-end types and trip purposes. In order to provide the most accurate estimates possible, the recommended approach to estimating VMT is outlined below. Deviating from this approach will require justification and approval from the City Staff. VMT Forecasting Instructions This approach will calculate total Origin/Destination (OD) VMT using standard SCAG model output files. The OD method for calculating total VMT includes all vehicle trips that start in a specific traffic analysis zone, and all vehicle trips that end in a specific traffic analysis zone. The major steps of this approach are listed as follows: • Re-skim final loaded congested networks and adjust the external skim for each mode and time period to account for truncated trips • Multiply appropriate distance skim matrices by OD trip matrices to estimate VMT by time period • Sum matrices by time period and mode to calculate daily automobile VMT City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 27 • Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs Appropriateness Checks The number of vehicle trips from the total VMT estimation should match as closely as possible with the results from the traditional model process. The estimated results should be checked against the results from a full model run to understand the degree of accuracy. Note that these custom processes may or may not include full lengths of IX/XI trips (trips with origins or destinations outside of the model roadway network) or special generator trips (airport, seaport, stadium, etc.). When calculating VMT for comparison at the study area, citywide, or regional geography, the same methodology that was used to estimate project specific VMT should be used. The VMT for these comparisons can be easily calculated by aggregating the row or column totals for all zones that are within the desired geography. City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020 28 Attachment D: VMT Mitigation Strategies 101 Pacifica | Suite 300 | Irvine, CA 92618 | (949) 308-6300 www.fehrandpeers.com 1. SGVCOG VMT Reduction Calculations This section describes the SCGCOG VMT Evaluation Tool’s approach to calculating the effectiveness of VMT reduction strategies that are built into the tool. While a long list of potential VMT reduction measures are made available to users, care must be taken by the analyst to understand and carefully consider the research supporting each VMT reduction measure to determine the efficacy of the potential VMT mitigation. 1.1 Neighborhood Place Types Based on empirical research that used quantitative methods to classify the census tracts of California into neighborhood place types, a place type is assigned to each parcel in the SGVCOG.1 These place types, described in Table 1, categorize the neighborhood surrounding specific parcels in terms of density, general accessibility and access to transit, and land use. These factors have been shown to have a substantial effect on a location’s ability to support low-VMT travel. To reflect this, the place types are used to identify maximum potential VMT reductions for projects, based on research studies. Where supported by research, the neighborhood place types are also used to identify the effectiveness of specific VMT reduction strategies. Table 1. Neighborhood Place Types Neighborhood Place Types Description Central City Urban Very high density, excellent accessibility, high public transit access, low single-family homes, older high-value housing stock Urban High Transit Use High density, good accessibility, high public transit access, low single-family homes, middle-aged and older housing stock Urban Low Transit Use Good accessibility, low vacancy, middle-aged housing stock Suburb with Multifamily Housing Average on most indicators, low single-family homes, and relatively lower housing values Suburb with Single-Family Homes Low density and accessibility, low vacancy, high newer single-family homes, and relatively higher housing values Rural in Urbanized Area Slightly better accessibility than the truly “rural” tracts, more likely to have multifamily housing Rural Very low access, high vacancy, high newer single-family homes with lower housing values (mainly outside population centers of any kind) Notes: Neighborhood place type coding used in script: 1) Urban Low Transit Use, 2) Suburb with Multifamily Housing, 3) Central City Urban, 4) Rural, 5) Suburb with Single Family Homes, 6) Urban High Transit Use, and 7) Rural in Urbanized Area. 1 Neighborhood types from Salon, Deborah. February 2014. Quantifying the effect of local government actions on VMT. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. August 27, 2020 Page 2 of 32 1.2 VMT Reduction Strategies Each strategy for the four different VMT mitigation categories is supported by evidence from a previous literature review prepared by Fehr & Peers, and from our work in VMT reduction strategies. This documentation also includes rural in Urbanized Area and Rural neighborhood place types.2 The mitigation categories (or tiers) are: • Tier 1: Project Characteristics • Tier 2: Multimodal Infrastructure • Tier 3: Parking • Tier 4: Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Programs Strategies and their corresponding evidence and calculations in the tool are described below. (Shortened versions of these descriptions are presented in the tooltips (information buttons) within the tool itself.) Matrices of reductions and elasticities are provided below for each of the four strategy categories (Table 2 to Table 5). Strategy names are listed in the order in which they appear in the tool. 1.2.1 Standards of Evidence While a long list of potential VMT reduction measures are made available to users of the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool, care must be taken by the analyst to understand what VMT reduction strategies may have already been captured in the SCAG travel model to avoid double counting. Furthermore, the analyst should carefully consider the research supporting each VMT reduction measure to determine the efficacy of the potential VMT mitigation. For example, the analyst may consider whether the supporting studies were based on a statistical model (such as a regression analysis, logit model, etc.) or another type of study, such as a synthesis of available research or a model that provides inferential support for a VMT reduction. The analyst may also look at the geographic location(s) and setting(s) covered in the study or studies that support a VMT reduction. 1.2.2 Tier 1: Project Characteristics This category is composed of strategies that change land use characteristics, such as density, mix of uses, and housing affordability. These strategies reduce VMT by increasing access to amenities or by attracting residents who generate lower VMT than the average household. Reductions and elasticities for the four strategies are in Table 2. 2 These neighborhood place types were added for completeness and allows reductions similar to suburban with single family neighborhood place type to provide flexibility in testing VMT reductions in rural settings. Many VMT reduction measures are not as effective in rural settings and the analyst should consider available research and supplement that research with local data on VMT reductions in rural settings when evaluating VMT reductions in a rural setting. August 27, 2020 Page 3 of 32 1.2.2.1 PC 01 Increase Residential Density Increased residential density, measured in dwelling units per existing residential acreage in a given area, affects the distances people travel and provides greater options for the mode of travel they choose. This measure provides a foundation for implementing other measures that would benefit from increased densities. This strategy applies to residential land uses only. This study used a large sample of data from Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco metropolitan areas to model the relationship between the VMT and urban design variables.3 The study found that households per residential acre (Hh/RA) provided the greatest explanatory power for VMT variation across an area. VMT per household is estimated as a function of the ratio of households to residential acreage in the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) or the half-mile buffer around a parcel under the existing condition and under the with project condition. The VMT reduction is based on the estimated change in calculated VMT per household without the project and with the project. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=�𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻ℎ 𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟−𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻ℎ𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟�𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻ℎ𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 The study’s VMT per household equation for the Los Angeles metropolitan area is shown below. Data from the Los Angeles metropolitan area was incorporated into the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool as shown below. 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻ℎ=19749(4.814 +𝐻𝐻ℎ𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅4.814 +7.140)−0.639 1.2.2.2 PC 02 Increase Development Diversity (and PC 05) Increasing the amount of space dedicated to a less common or nonexistent use in the area surrounding the land use development project leads to a reduction in VMT. Having different types of land uses near one another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non-auto modes of transport. For example, when residential areas are in the same neighborhood as retail and office buildings, residents do not need to travel outside of the neighborhood to run errands and may be able to live and work in the same neighborhood. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses. The land use diversity of the TAZ or half-mile buffer around a parcel is measured using an activity mix index. The activity mix index is a proportion of the number of people in the TAZ or parcel buffer participating as residents or employees in retail, office, industrial and other jobs to the number of possible land uses on the TAZ or parcel buffer. The activity mix index for the TAZ or 3 Holtzclaw, et al. 2002. “Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and Socioeconomic Characteristics Determine Auto Ownership and Use – Studies in Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.” Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 25, pp. 1–27. August 27, 2020 Page 4 of 32 parcel buffer without the development is compared with the activity mix with the development to estimate the VMT reduction accomplished by improving the mix of activities in the neighborhood. The elasticities of per capita VMT and VMT per worker by neighborhood place type with respect to the activity mix index are estimated based on the empirical research supporting the strategy.4 The study used multiple statistical modeling methods to estimate the effect of land use variables on VMT by neighborhood place type, using data from travel surveys conducted between 2001 and 2009. PC 05 is the Employment portion of strategy PC 02, which is not shown explicitly in the tool but is activated when the user selects strategy PC 02 for a project that includes employment land uses. 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀 𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀= �𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖× ln(𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖)ln (𝑁𝑁)𝑁𝑁 𝑖𝑖=1 𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖=𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 (𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟) 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑁𝑁=𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 % 𝐶𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎= 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× % ∆ 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀 1.2.2.3 PC 03 Affordable Housing This strategy encourages building a greater percentage of affordable and below market rate (BMR) housing to allow for lower income families to live at the project. Research has shown that households with incomes at or below 80 percent of the regional median income make fewer trips by automobile than households with higher incomes, resulting in lower per capita VMT in some jurisdictions. BMR housing can also provide opportunities for lower income families to live closer to job centers and to use transit for their commutes. This strategy applies to residential land uses only. This VMT reduction is based on a study that used data from the 2010-2012 California Household Travel Survey (CHTS) to determine a relationship between VMT and low-income households. The study reported the estimated VMT reductions of three lower income household groups when compared to the VMT of median family income (MFI) households.5 The research that is available is based on the behavior of lower incomes households but not on the behavior of lower income households living in BMR housing. The reductions by income group are listed below. 𝐸𝐸𝑀𝑀𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝐴𝐴 𝐿𝐿𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤 𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 (𝐻𝐻𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 30% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀𝐼𝐼)= −32.5% 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝐿𝐿𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤 𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 (𝐻𝐻𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 30% 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 50% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀𝐼𝐼)= −25.2% 𝐿𝐿𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤 𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 (𝐻𝐻𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 50% 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 80% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀𝐼𝐼)= −10.2% 4 Salon, Deborah. 2013. Quantifying the effect of local government actions on VMT. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. 5 Newmark, G. and Haas, P. 2015. Income, Location Efficiency, and VMT: Affordable Housing as a Climate Strategy. The California Housing Partnership. August 27, 2020 Page 5 of 32 1.2.2.4 PC 04 Increase Employment Density Like increasing residential density, increasing employment density affects the distances people commute and provides greater options for the modes of travel they choose. Employment density is measured as the ratio of the number of employees to the net commercial and industrial acreage in a given area. Employment includes office, retail, industrial, and other employment. This strategy applies to employment land uses only. The study used to support this strategy reported VMT decreases in lower density locations, such as suburban places, with an increase in employment density.6 The study is based on results from a linear regression model of cross-sectional data collected from Austin’s Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization to determine the differences in VMT associated with employment density. For suburban neighborhood place types (suburban with multifamily home and single-family homes), a 0.03 percent reduction in VMT was observed for a 1 percent increase in employment density. In higher-density locations (urban neighborhood place types), VMT was observed to increase in response to employment density. This increase could be related to the replacement of housing with employment uses in an already job-rich environment. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 (𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟)=−0.03 × % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 6 Zhou, B. and K. M. Kockelman. 2008. Self-selection in home choice: use of treatment effects in evaluating relationship between built environment and travel behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2077(1): 54-61. Cited in Circella, Giovanni et al. 2014. Impacts of Employment Density on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Policy Brief and Technical Background Document). California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. August 27, 2020 Page 6 of 32 Table 2. Project Characteristics Strategy Elasticities and Reductions Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1 Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural PC 01 Increase Residential Density Project Density (Dwelling Units) % change in VMT / % change in household density See strategy methods for reduction. PC 02 PC 05 Increase Development Diversity (Residential and Employment) Land Use Types (Dwelling Units and 1,000 square feet) % change in residential VMT / % change in the activity mix index % change in employment VMT / % change in the activity mix index -0.191 -0.14 0 -0.144 0 0 -0.0325 -0.0329 0 0 0 0 0 0 PC 03 Affordable Housing BMR Units by income type VMT / capita Extremely Low Income (Household earns less than 30% of MFI) = -32.5% Very Low Income (Household earns between 30% and 50% of MFI) = -25.2% Low Income (Household earns between 50% and 80% of MFI) = -10.2% PC 04 Increase Employment Density Project Density (Jobs) % change in VMT / % change in employment density 0.074 0.074 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 Note: 1. Elasticities are expressed as a decimal less than 1 while reductions are expressed as a percentage or a constant. August 27, 2020 Page 7 of 32 1.2.3 Tier 2: Multimodal Infrastructure These strategies require project developers to provide funding for and/or construct improvements to the surrounding transportation network that encourage the use of biking, walking, and transit instead of driving. Reductions and elasticities for the five strategies are in Table 3. 1.2.3.1 MI 01 Increase Bike Access This strategy requires the project developer to provide funding for or construct bicycle facilities that close gaps in the bicycle network and/or lower the level of traffic stress on the existing bicycle network (e.g., construct a barrier or buffer for an existing bike lane). Improving bike access to project sites encourages people to bike instead of drive, thus reducing VMT. This strategy only applies to bicycle facilities that provide a dedicated lane for bicyclists or a completely separated right-of-way for bicycles and pedestrians. This includes the construction of or improvements to Class I (trail), Class II (bike lane), and Class IV (protected bike lane) bikeways. This measure would not be applicable if the resulting gap between the project and the external bikeway exceeds 1/3 mile. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses, The research supporting this reduction used a large sample of travel data within the city limits of Montreal to investigate the link between bicycle infrastructure accessibility and cycling modal share.7 The study reports a 3.71 percent increase in bicycle mode share for a 1 percent decrease in distance to cycling infrastructure for the urban with low transit neighborhood place type. The same study reports different elasticities for urban (central city urban and urban high transit) and suburban (suburban multifamily housing and single-family homes) neighborhood place types. These elasticities are shown in Table 3. % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=0.371 × % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 The shift from vehicle trips to bicycle trips is expected to occur for vehicle trips that are of bikeable length. Thus, the actual VMT reduction is prorated by the ratio of the average bicycle trip length to the average vehicle trip length. Average trip lengths are derived from California Household Travel Survey (CHTS) data. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=(% 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)(𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟) 7 Zahabi, S., Chang, A., Miranda-Moreno, L., and Patterson, Z. 2016. Exploring the link between the neighborhood typologies, bicycle infrastructure and commuting cycling over time and the potential impact on commuter GHG emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 47:89–103. August 27, 2020 Page 8 of 32 1.2.3.2 MI 02 Improve Connectivity – Network Connectivity/Design Improvements Building a new street connection and/or connecting cul-de-sacs to provide pedestrian and bicycle access enhances walkability, connectivity, and street accessibility within a neighborhood. VMT reductions are based on the change to intersection densities within a quarter mile buffer of the project and on internal connections within the project site. Intersection density is a calculated as the number of intersections per square mile within a quarter mile buffer around the project site. The user can estimate existing intersection density manually or using Geographic Information System (GIS) software. The strategy applies to residential and employment land uses. The study synthesized the results of nine studies to determine the effect of intersection and street density on VMT reductions.8 The study reports a -0.12 elasticity of VMT reduction with respect to a one percent increase in intersection density. This reduction only applies to suburban neighborhood place types, as the relative improvement to pedestrian accessibility is greater in suburban areas than in urban areas that already have dense street networks. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟= −0.12 × % 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 1.2.3.3 MI 03 Increase Transit Accessibility Building the project within a proximity to a transit station or stop with high-quality service enhances access to transit which facilities the use of transit for people traveling to/from the project site. Facilitating transit use results in a mode shift from driving to transit and thereby reduces VMT. In the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool, this strategy is applied by taking the distance between the project site and the closest transit stop without project improvements and the distance to the closest transit stop with project improvements and applying an elasticity factor; therefore, the project can reduce its VMT by relocating a transit stop closer to the site. Proposed changes to transit stop locations should be negotiated with the Lead Agency and the applicable transit operator. The strategy applies to residential and employment land uses. The study supporting this strategy provides results on the effect of urban form, including distance to transit, on VMT through modeling data from the 1990 National Personal Transportation Survey data.9 The associated reduction in VMT with the reduction in distance to transit (elasticity) is reported as -0.08. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟= −0.08 × % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 8 Ewing, R., and Cervero, R. 2010. Travel and the Built Environment - A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association. 9 Bento, A.M., Cropper, M.L., Mobarak, A.M., and Vinha, K. 2003. The Impact of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in The United States. World Bank policy research working paper, 3007. August 27, 2020 Page 9 of 32 1.2.3.4 MI 04 Traffic Calming This strategy requires the project design to include pedestrian/bicycle safety and traffic calming measures both on-site and in the surrounding neighborhood. Providing traffic calming measures encourages people to walk or bike instead of using a vehicle, resulting in decreased VMT. VMT reductions are based on whether the project will be providing at a minimum median refuges, bulb-outs, and/or other pedestrian crossing enhancements beyond the frontage of the development. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses. The study supporting this strategy quantified the effects of traffic calming on VMT by comparing the change in VMT in suburban and urban neighborhood place types with same pedestrian environment conditions with and without traffic calming improvements.9 The study found that traffic calming improvements yield higher VMT reductions in suburban places than in urban places, as the relative reduction in traffic speeds is greater in suburban areas than in urban areas where traffic already tends to move slowly. If the project provides traffic calming improvements beyond the project site frontage, the reduction from the evidence is applied based on the neighborhood place type of the project site. These reductions are shown in Table 3. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟= 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 1.2.3.5 MI 05 Pedestrian Networks This strategy requires the project design to include pedestrian improvements both on-site and in the surrounding neighborhood. Providing a pedestrian accessible network encourages people to walk instead of drive, thereby reducing VMT. The pedestrian improvements include but are not limited to buffered sidewalks on both sides of the street, marked or signalized pedestrian crossings at intersections (enhanced crosswalks), lighting, and curb ramps. This strategy applies to both residential and employment land uses. The study supporting this strategy quantified the effects of the pedestrian environment on VMT by comparing the change in VMT in suburban and urban neighborhood place types with same pedestrian environment conditions with and without pedestrian improvements.10 The study found that pedestrian improvements yield higher VMT reductions in suburban places than in urban places, since suburban places tend to have less developed pedestrian networks to begin with. If the project provides pedestrian network improvements beyond the project site frontage, the reduction is then applied based on neighborhood place type of the project site. These reductions are shown in Table 3. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟= 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 10 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute. August 27, 2020 Page 10 of 32 Table 3. Multimodal Infrastructure Strategy Elasticities and Reductions Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1 Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural MI 01 Bike Access Improvements Distance to nearest existing bicycle facility % change in bicycle mode share / % decrease in distance to cycling infrastructure -0.371 -0.371 -0.371 -0.371 -0.371 -0.371 -0.371 MI 02 Improve Connectivity (Network Connectivity/ Design Improvements) Intersection Density % change in VMT / % change in intersection density -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 MI 03 Increase Transit Accessibility Distance to closest transit stop % change in VMT / % reduction in distance to transit -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 MI 04 Traffic Calming Measures Binary Answer VMT / capita VMT/worker -0.6% -0.6% -2% -2% -2% -2% -2% MI 05 Pedestrian Networks Binary Answer VMT / capita VMT/worker -0.6% -0.6% -2% -2% -2% -2% -2% Note: 1. Elasticities are expressed as a decimal less than 1 while reductions are expressed as a percentage or a constant. August 27, 2020 Page 11 of 32 1.2.4 Tier 3: Parking Strategies in this category reduce automobile parking supply, making driving less attractive, and provide high-quality bicycle parking, making biking more attractive. Reductions and elasticities for the two strategies are in Table 4. 1.2.4.1 PK 01 Limit Parking Supply This strategy would require the development to decrease parking supply at the project site to rates lower than those documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation manual or to those documented by the municipal code if that is what the jurisdiction has chosen. Decreasing parking supply encourages employees to choose an alternative transportation mode for their commutes. This measure only applies if street parking is not free or unrestricted during typical working hours. Surrounding street parking must be metered, have time limits during typical working hours, and/or be available to residential parking permit (RPP) holders only. The strategy applies to employment land uses only. VMT reductions for this strategy are based on the project's parking supply compared to the minimum parking supply requirement from municipal or ITE code. The parking supply reduction is limited to 25 percent from minimum required by municipal code. The strategy uses an equation derived from the URBEMIS model parking mitigation component. The URBEMIS model is used to calculate air quality impacts for development projects based on VMT reduction and other emissions reduction approaches.11 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=% 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝐴𝐴 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐼𝐼𝑇𝑇𝐸𝐸 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 0.5 1.2.4.2 PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities This strategy requires the project developer to provide and maintain facilities for bicycle users at the project site. Providing end of trip facilities encourages people to bike instead of drive, thereby reducing VMT. Examples of end of trip facilities include bike parking, bicycle lockers, showers, and personal lockers. The extent of the VMT reduction is based on whether the project provides only secure bike parking or secure bike parking and additional facilities. This strategy applies to employment land uses only and overlaps with the TP 05 Commute Trip Reduction Program strategy. The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on evidence from a study that examined the effects of bicycle infrastructure on the probability of cycling to work using a multivariable regression analysis of 2010 travel survey data collected by the Metropolitan Washington Council of 11 Nelson\Nygaard. 2005. Crediting Low-Traffic Developments: Adjusting Site-Level Vehicle Trip Generation Using URBEMIS. August 27, 2020 Page 12 of 32 Governments.12 From a final sample of 4,711 households, the study determined that employees are 1.78 times more likely to commute by bicycle when secure bicycle parking is provided than when it is not, and that employees are 4.86 times more likely to commute by bicycle when bicycle parking and additional end of trip facilities are provided than when they are not. These odds ratios are multiplied by the existing bicycle mode share of the TAZ or half-mile buffer around a parcel to determine the new bicycle mode share for the TAZ or parcel buffer. The shift from vehicle trips to bicycle trips is expected to occur for vehicle trips that are of bikeable length. Thus, the actual VMT reduction is prorated by the ratio of the average bicycle trip length to the average vehicle trip length. Average trip lengths are derived from California Household Travel Survey (CHTS) data. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=(% 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)(𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟) 12 Buehler, R. 2012. Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: The role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work. Transportation Research Part D, 17: 525-531. August 27, 2020 Page 13 of 32 Table 4. Parking Strategy Elasticities and Reductions Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural PK 01 Limit Parking Supply Total Employee Parking Spaces Maximum VMT / worker reduction -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities Binary Answer bicycle commuters when bicycle parking is available / bicycle commuters when bicycle parking is not available bicycle commuters when bicycle end trip facilities are available / bicycle commuters when bicycle end trip facilities are not available 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 Note: 1. Elasticities are expressed as a decimal less than 1 while reductions are expressed as a percentage or a constant. August 27, 2020 Page 14 of 32 1.2.5 Tier 4: TDM Programs Included in this category are programmatic strategies that reduce VMT by providing alternatives to driving alone, as well as incentives, such as ride sharing programs, transit subsidies, and shuttle services. These strategies would be implemented on an ongoing basis once the project is occupied. Reductions and elasticities for the 18 strategies are in Table 6. 1.2.5.1 TP 01 School Pool Programs The strategy would require the organization of a program that matches families in carpools for school pick-up and drop-off. The program would be open to all families in the development. Organizing a School Pool Program helps match parents who transport students to schools without a bussing program, including private schools, charter schools, and neighborhood schools where students cannot walk or bike. School pools reduce the total number of vehicle trips traveling to and from schools, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy is supported by evidence from 2012 California Household Travel Survey where 2.3% of the home-based VMT is generated by home-based K-12 school trips. According to American Community Survey (ACS 2017), about 27.85% of the households have kids in K-12 school. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=8.25%× % 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.2 TP 02 Bike Sharing Programs This strategy requires the project developer to dedicate space for or provide subsidies to a bike sharing system, ideally one with high penetration in a larger area, such as Bay Wheels. Bike share substitutes for some driving trips and provides a first/last-mile connection for transit users, reducing auto trips and thereby reducing VMT. This reduction only applies if a bike share station is eventually built on site. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses. This strategy is supported by a study that reported the effects of a pilot bicycle share system on bicycle usage in London.13 Online surveys of existing customers were used to assess mode shifts due to bike share use. The study reported that 6 percent of users shifted from driving to using bike share for work or school trips. The shift from vehicle trips to bicycle trips is expected to occur for vehicle trips that are of bikeable length. Thus, the actual VMT reduction is prorated by the ratio of the average bicycle trip length to the average vehicle trip length. Average trip lengths are derived from California Household Travel Survey (CHTS) data. 13 Noland, R.B., and Ishaque, M.M. 2006. Smart bicycles in an urban area: Evaluation of a pilot scheme in London. J. Public Transportation. 9 (5), 71–95. August 27, 2020 Page 15 of 32 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=(−6% 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)(𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟) 1.2.5.3 TP 03 Car Sharing Programs The strategy requires the project to provide subsidies and promotions, as well as dedicated parking spaces, for car sharing services such as ZipCar, Car2Go, and/or GetAround. Supporting a car sharing program allows people to have on-demand access to a shared fleet of vehicles. Car sharing helps support the use of walking, biking, carpooling, and transit by providing access to vehicles for occasional trips and a guaranteed ride home option, allowing for overall reductions in auto use which results in reduced VMT. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses. Evidence supporting this strategy is from a study that examined the impact of car sharing on household VMT in the Bay Area.14 Travel diary surveys were collected from 527 members and 45 non-members at five points between 2001 and 2005. Members reported reducing their household VMT by 32.8 percent. The expected participation rate of 2 percent is derived from report by UCLA documenting commuting characteristics of faculty, staff, and students.15 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=32.8%× % 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 × % 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟/𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.4 TP 04 Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Marketing and Education This strategy requires implementing a marketing campaign, targeting all project employees and visitors, that encourages the use of transit, shared rides, and active modes and thereby reducing VMT. Marketing strategies may include new employee orientation on alternative commute options, event promotions, and publications. The strategy applies to employment land uses only. This strategy overlaps with the TP 05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program and TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program strategies. The strategy is based on a study that synthesizes evidence from four studies on the link between TDM strategies and travel behavior.16 The study documents 82 case studies of employer and institutional TDM programs from different locations in the US. Programs that primarily offered commute trip reduction marketing/education yielded an average 4 percent reduction of commute vehicle trips. This strategy assumes a 1:1 ratio of vehicle trips to vehicle miles traveled. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=4% × 1(𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟)× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 14 Cervero, R., Golub, A., and Nee, B. 2007. City CarShare: Longer-term travel demand and car ownership impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1992: 70-80. 15 UCLA Transportation. 2011 State of the Commute Report. 16 Transit Cooperative Research Program. 2010. TCRP 95 Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes – Chapter 19 Employer and Institutional TDM Strategies. August 27, 2020 Page 16 of 32 1.2.5.5 TP 05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program This strategy requires providing a comprehensive program to reduce the number of drive-alone commute trips to the project and to actively monitor and react to changes in mode share. The program includes encouraging and assisting employees to use an alternative commute mode. Tools may include carpooling encouragement, ride share assistance, flexible/alternative work schedules, vanpool assistance, bicycle end of trip facilities, and other measures. The strategy applies to employment land uses only. This strategy overlaps with the PK02 Provide Bike Facilities, TP04 Commute Trip Reduction Marketing and Education, TP08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules, TP13 Ride-Sharing Programs, TP15 Behavioral Intervention, TP17 Vanpool Incentives, and TP18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program strategies. The strategy’s evidence is from research that used a multivariable model to estimate the effects of TDM measures on VMT for various neighborhood place types.17 VMT reductions by neighborhood place type are shown in Table 6. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.6 TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out This strategy requires project employers to offer employee parking "cash-out,” which gives employees the choice to forgo subsidized/free parking for a cash payment equivalent to the cost that the employer would otherwise pay for the parking space. Providing an alternative to subsidized/free parking encourages commuters to travel via walking, biking, carpooling, and transit, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to employment land uses only and overlaps with the TP10 Price Workplace Parking strategy. The strategy is supported by a study that used a multivariable model to estimate the effects of TDM measures, such as providing a parking “cash-out,” on VMT for various neighborhood place types.18 The strategy is less effective in suburban and low transit neighborhood place types than in urban and high transit neighborhood place types. The VMT reductions by neighborhood place type are shown in Table 6. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 17 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute. 18 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute. August 27, 2020 Page 17 of 32 1.2.5.7 TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program This strategy requires project employers or building operators to provide either partially or fully subsidized transit passes for all project affiliates (employees and/or residents). Providing subsidies for transit use encourages people to use transit rather than driving, thereby reducing VMT. The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on a study that synthesizes five studies documenting the effects of transit service strategies on transit ridership.19 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=% 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟1 −% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 0.43 × % 𝑜𝑜𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴× % 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.8 TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules This strategy requires project employers to allow and encourage employees to telecommute from home when possible, or to shift work schedules such that travel occurs outside of peak congestion periods. This strategy reduces commute trips, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to employment land uses only and overlaps with the TP05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program strategy. The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on a study that uses a multivariable model that provides the effects of specific TDM measures on VMT.20 VMT reductions are quantified for telecommuting 1.5 days a week, a 9/80 schedule, and a 4/40 schedule. The VMT reductions for the different telecommuting and alternative work schedule approaches are shown in Table 6. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.9 TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet This strategy requires project employers to provide direct shuttle service to the project site from areas with high concentrations of employees. This strategy reduces drive-alone commute trips, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to employment land uses only and overlaps with the TP13 Ride-Sharing Program and TP17 Vanpool Incentives strategies. The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on a study from San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA).21 The commuter Shuttle Pilot Program Evaluation Report reported that 47 percent of users would have driven if the shuttle were not available. The evidence is used to estimate the shift from vehicle commuting to shuttle commuting, thereby 19 Handy, Susan et al. 2013. Impacts of Transit Service Strategies on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. 20 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute. 21 SFMTA. 2015. Commuter Shuttle Pilot Program Evaluation Report. August 27, 2020 Page 18 of 32 reducing vehicle commute trips. Assuming a one-to-one adjustment factor for commuter trips to commute miles the operating shuttle service could achieve about 47% reduction in commute VMT. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=47%× % 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.10 TP 10 Price Workplace Parking This strategy would require commuters to pay for parking on-site. This strategy provides a disincentive to driving and encourages commuters to use other modes, thereby reducing VMT. The strategy applies to employment land uses only and overlaps with the TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out strategy. The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on a study that used a multivariable model to determine the effects of TDM measures on VMT, and on a synthesis of research documenting the effects of annual vehicle costs on VMT.22,23 Pricing on-site workplace parking contributes to annual vehicle operating costs, which reduces driving and thus reduces VMT. The parking charges documented in the research have been updated to 2017 dollars. Table 5 documents the VMT reductions by neighborhood place type and parking charge. Users should select the daily parking fee closest to the per-day cost to commuters, whether it is paid on a daily, monthly, or annual basis. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑇𝑇𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 5 × % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 22 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute. 23 Todd Litman. 2017. Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (VTPI). http://www.vtpi.org/elasticities.pdf. Accessed July 2017. August 27, 2020 Page 19 of 32 Table 5. VMT Reduction by Daily Parking Fee and Neighborhood Place Type Daily Parking Fee Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural $1.14 6.9% 6.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% $2.28 12.5% 12.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% $3.42 16.8% 16.8% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% $4.56 17.8% 17.8% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% $5.70 18.8% 18.8% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% $6.85 19.8% 19.8% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 1.2.5.11 TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits This strategy requires the project employers to provide general commute benefits to employees, which may include financial subsidies or pre-tax deductions for transit, carpooling, and vanpooling activities. The strategy’s evidence is from a study that contains several case studies on the influence of commuter benefits on employee travel.24 The one most fitting for this category is that travel impacts are affected by the magnitude of the benefit and the quality of travel options available. Mode shifts tend to be greatest if current transit use is low. In New York City, where transit commute rates are already high, transit benefits only increased transit use 16% to 23%, while in Philadelphia, transit commuting increased 32% (Schwenk, 1995). Similarly, only 30% of employees who received transit benefits who work in San Francisco increased their transit use, while 44% of those in other parts of the region commuted by transit more (Oram Associates, 1995). The 44% figure was used in the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool and an assumption was made of a one-to- one relationship between increased transit use and reduced commute VMT. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=44% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇× % 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.12 TP 12 Neighborhood Schools This strategy requires the project to contribute to the development of a neighborhood school that would serve families living in the development. Neighborhood schools primarily serve the neighborhoods immediately surrounding the school and allow students to walk or bike to school, 24 Litman, Todd. 2017. Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (VTPI). http://www.vtpi.org/elasticities.pdf. Accessed July 2017. August 27, 2020 Page 20 of 32 reducing the use of automobiles for drop-off and pick-up trips and thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to residential land uses only. The strategy’s evidence is from a study that investigated the effects of school choice on walkability and mode choice for schools in St. Paul, Minnesota.25 The study reported a 78 percent decrease in vehicle miles traveled by households traveling to a neighborhood school compared to a citywide school. This reduction only affects home-based school VMT, which makes up 2.3% of all home-based VMT per the California Household Travel Survey. The decrease in VMT is estimated by multiplying the decrease in VMT for school trips by the share of home-based VMT made up by school trips and by the user’s estimate of total households with school-aged children in the project. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=77.7%× 2.3% × 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.13 TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs This strategy would require project employers or building operators to organize a carpool matching program for individuals who have similar commute patterns. This strategy encourages the use of carpooling, reducing the number of vehicle trips and thereby reducing VMT. The strategy applies to employment land uses only. This strategy overlaps with three strategies: TP05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, TP09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet, and TP17 Vanpool Incentives. The effect of ride-sharing programs on VMT is derived from a study by United States Environmental Protection Agency.26 The study found that ride-sharing programs had an average occupancy of 2.2 people per car and could achieve a 54.5% VMT reduction. This assumed reduction is multiplied by the expected participation rate, which typically ranges between 2% and 10%. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=54.5% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 × 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.14 TP 14 Transit Service Expansion This strategy requires the project developer to subsidize transit service through fees and other contributions to the transit provider, thereby improving transit service to the project, resulting in increased use of transit and reduced VMT. The VMT reduction is based on the contribution’s effect on transit frequency and the number of routes affected by the contribution. This strategy 25 Wilson, Elizabeth J., Ryan Wilson, and Kevin J. Krizek. 2007. "The Implications of School Choice on Travel Behavior and Environmental Emissions." Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 12.7: 506-518. 26 United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Implementing Commuter Benefits as One of the Nation's Best Workplaces for Commuters. August 27, 2020 Page 21 of 32 differs from TP07 Subsidized or Discounted Transit Program in that subsidies are provided to the public transit agency, not to transit riders. This strategy applies to both residential and employment land uses. Proposed changes to transit service should be negotiated with the Lead Agency and the applicable transit operator. A synthesis of research documenting the effects of transit service strategies on transit ridership and VMT found that a 1 percent increase in service frequency leads to a ridership increase of 0.5 percent.27 The user-input change in transit frequency is multiplied by this elasticity, and the route contribution proxy. The route contribution proxy is an adjustment factor to account for the share of transit ridership increases that reflect ridership shifting from other lines. It is determined by the percentage of routes affected by the improvement. If less than half are affected, 50 percent of riders are assumed to come from other lines. If more than half are affected, 15 percent are assumed to come from other lines.25 The resulting increase in ridership is multiplied by the existing transit mode share for the TAZ or half-mile buffer around the parcel and an adjustment factor prorating VMT to transit trips (0.67)28 to yield the percent VMT reduction. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=0.5 × 0.67 × % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴× 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴× 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑃𝑃𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴=50% (𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 50% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟); 85% (𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 50% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟) 1.2.5.15 TP 15 Behavioral Intervention This strategy requires project to provide intensive one-on-one counseling and encouragement, along with subsidies, to encourage individuals to use non-drive alone modes. Implementing this program encourages the use of transit, shared ride modes, bicycling, walking, and telecommuting, reducing drive-alone trips and thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses. This strategy overlaps with TP04 Commute Trip Reduction Marketing and Education, TP05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, and TP18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Program. 27 Handy, Susan et al. 2013. Impacts of Transit Service Strategies on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. 28 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2010. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Government to Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhous Gas Mitigation Measures. August 27, 2020 Page 22 of 32 The strategy is based on the study that analyzed the effects of a targeted behavioral intervention treatment (UCLA Transportation Guide) on travel behavior of incoming graduate students in UCLA. The study included 3,166 admitted students, half of whom received the guide and half of whom where in the control group.29 The treatment guide provides detailed information on how to use alternative modes of transportation to access campus. Students in the treatment group drove 23.6 miles per week on average compared to 33.6 miles for the control group, representing an approximately 30% decrease. The study noted that the treatment was only effective among students who moved within the past six months and was also only effective among students who have automobile resources. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=30% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 × 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒/𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 1.2.5.16 TP 16 Unbundle Parking Costs from Property Cost (On Site Parking) The strategy requires project developers or building operators to unbundle the cost of parking spaces from the price of the property. Residents must rent or purchase parking spaces separately from their residential units. This increases the cost of auto ownership, thereby discouraging auto ownership and use, which reduces VMT. Surrounding streets must have parking restrictions in place, such as metered parking, time limits restricting overnight parking, and residential parking permits (RPP) for which project residents are not eligible. This strategy applies to residential land uses only. The -0.4 elasticity of vehicle ownership with respect to vehicle costs is derived from a study that provides inferential support on the effect of vehicle costs on vehicle ownership.30 Charging for parking separately increases the cost of vehicle ownership, which makes owning a car less attractive, thus reducing automobile use and VMT. The estimated reduction in vehicle ownership is estimated by multiplying the percent change in vehicle cost (based on monthly parking fees and the cost of vehicle ownership) by the elasticity of demand. The average base vehicle ownership cost is $8,849, as reported by the American Automobile Association in 2018.31 Since reducing vehicle ownership does not eliminate driving or use of taxis and ride-hailing apps, the reduction in vehicle ownership is multiplied by 85 percent to produce the percent VMT reduction generated by this strategy.32 29 Brown, Anne, et al. 2016. The Right Time and Place to Change Travel Behavior: An Experimental Study. 30 Litman, Todd. 2009. Parking Requirement Impacts on Housing Affordability. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 31 American Automobile Association. August 2018. Your Driving Costs. http://newsroom.aaa.com/tag/driving-cost-per-mile/. Accessed October 2018. 32 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Government to Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhous Gas Mitigation Measures. 2010 August 27, 2020 Page 23 of 32 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=𝐶𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴× 𝑅𝑅 𝑊𝑊ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟: 𝐶𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 = (𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑝𝑝𝐴𝐴 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟)/(($8,849/12)) 𝑅𝑅 = 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑂𝑂𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 = 0.85 1.2.5.17 TP 17 Vanpool Incentives The strategy requires project employers or building operators to provide subsidies for individuals forming new vanpools for their commute. This encourages the use of vanpools, reducing drive- alone trips and thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to employment land uses only. This strategy overlaps with the TP05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, TP09 Free Door- to-Door Transit Fleet, and TP13 Ride-Sharing Program strategies. The strategy’s evidence is from a study that used 1999 survey data from the Commute Trip Reduction Program of the Puget Sound region to analyze the relationship of demand for vanpool services to fare changes using a conditional discrete choice model.33 The study found a -0.73 elasticity of vanpool demand in response to a change in fares (or costs to driver). This elasticity is multiplied by the percent reduction in vanpool fare as well as the percent of employees who are expected to participate in vanpooling, An adjustment factor of 82.1% is applied to adjust the vanpool demand to VMT, reflecting an average occupancy of 5.6 commuters per vanpool including the driver.34 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 = 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 × % 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝐴𝐴𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑜𝑜𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 82.1%× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 33 Concas, S. Winters, F. 2005. Fare Pricing Elasticity, Subsidies and The Demand for Vanpool Services. Via Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Online TDM Encyclopedia. http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/. Accessed July 2017. 34 Way to Go program Annual Report, Denver Regional Council of Governments, 2015. August 27, 2020 Page 24 of 32 1.2.5.18 TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program This strategy requires project employers or building operators to administer a program that targets individual attitudes and behaviors towards travel and provides tools for individuals to analyze and alter their travel behavior. Voluntary Travel Behavior Change programs include communication campaigns, marketing and promotions, and travel feedback programs, such as travel diaries or feedback on calories burned from activities and travel. This strategy encourages the use of shared ride modes, transit, walking, and biking, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses. This strategy overlaps with the TP04 Commute Trip Reduction Marketing/Education, TP05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, and TP15 Behavioral Intervention strategies. The VMT reduction is based on a synthesis of research that reviewed five studies reporting the impact of Voluntary Travel Behavior Change programs on VMT.35 A 4% reduction in VMT, which represents a lower-end figure from the range of VMT reductions among the United States examples in the study, is used in the calculation for this strategy. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=4%× % 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 35 Spears, Steven et al. 2013. Policy Brief on the Impacts of Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Programs Based on a Review of the Empirical Literature. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. August 27, 2020 Page 25 of 32 Table 6. TDM Program Strategy Elasticities and Reductions Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1 Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural TP 01 School Pool Programs Binary Input VMT / participating household -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% TP 02 Bike Sharing Programs Binary Input Percent change in bicycle trips -6% -6% -6% -6% -6% -6% -6% TP 03 Car Sharing Programs Percent of eligible residents or employees VMT / member -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% TP 04 Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Marketing and Education Percent of eligible employees VMT / worker -4% -4% -4% -4% -4% -4% -4% TP 05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program Percent of eligible employees VMT / worker 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out Percent of eligible employees VMT / worker 7.7% 7.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program Percent of Transit Subsidy VMT / worker -43% -43% -43% -43% -43% -43% -43% TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules Alternative Work Schedule and Percent of eligible employees VMT / worker Telecommuting 1.5 days per week: -0.22 4/40 schedule: -0.15 9/80 schedule: -0.07 TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet Percent of eligible employees VMT / worker 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% August 27, 2020 Page 26 of 32 Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1 Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural TP 10 Price Workplace Parking Percent of eligible employees and parking fee VMT / worker Varies based on price of parking. See strategy method, Table 5. TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits Percent of reduction in commute VMT Percent of eligible employees VMT / worker 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% TP 12 Neighborhood Schools Type of school serving project and percent of households with school aged children VMT / household 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs Percent of eligible employees VMT / worker 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% TP 14 Transit Service Expansion Percent of increase in transit frequency and Percent of routes affected by upgrade % change in transit ridership / % change in frequency 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 TP 15 Behavioral Intervention Percent individuals participating / eligible VMT / worker 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 August 27, 2020 Page 27 of 32 Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1 Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural TP 16 Unbundle Parking Costs from Property Cost (On Site Parking) Monthly Parking Costs % change in vehicle ownership / % change in annual vehicle cost -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 TP 17 Vanpool Incentives Percent of employer subsidized vanpool costs and percent of eligible employees % change in vanpool demand / % change in vanpool costs -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program Percent of eligible employees VMT / worker 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Note: 1. Elasticities are expressed as a decimal less than 1 while reductions are expressed as a percentage or a constant. August 27, 2020 Page 28 of 32 1.2.6 Category, Cross Category, and Global Maxima To provide reasonable estimates of VMT reduction effectiveness, maximum VMT reductions are set for the category, cross-category, and global levels. These maxima ensure that 1) strategies that target travel behavior in similar ways are not over-counted and 2) combined reductions are reasonable given a project’s context (neighborhood place type). The maxima applied in the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool are derived from the 2010 CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures report.36 1.2.6.1 Category Maxima Each category has a maximum allowable per capita VMT or per worker VMT reduction for the combination of measures in the category. The maxima vary depending on the project’s neighborhood place type. (Neighborhood place type definitions and assignments to specific parcels are informed by research, as summarized in Section 1.1 and Table 1.) The effects of multiple measures within a category are combined using multiplicative dampening, which reduces the effect of individual strategies as new strategies are added. Since multiple measures may affect the same user populations, this approach is used to ensure that reductions are not over-counted. For example, a transit-related measure and a bicycle-related measure may target the same person, but that person cannot switch from driving to both using transit and bicycling. As a result, the overall per capita VMT that can be affected by added strategies is lower than for any strategy implemented on its own. The equation for multiplicative dampening is shown below: 𝐶𝐶𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴=1 − �(1 −𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖)𝐾𝐾 𝑖𝑖=1 𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖= 𝑃𝑃𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 Per capita and per worker VMT reductions should be multiplied using the above multiplicative dampening equation across all mitigation measures in that category up to the maxima shown in Table 7. 36 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Government to Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. 2010. August 27, 2020 Page 29 of 32 Table 7. Project Characteristics Maxima Category Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural Project Characteristics 65% 30% 30% 10% 10% 10% 10% Multimodal Infrastructure 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% Parking 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Program 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 1.2.6.2 Physical Cross-Category Maxima A cross-category maximum is provided for the combination of project characteristics, multimodal infrastructure, and parking strategies. Like the method used for the category maxima, the effect of multiple categories is combined using multiplicative dampening to ensure that reductions are not over-counted. 𝐶𝐶𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑅𝑅𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑃𝑃ℎ𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=1 − �(1 −𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖)𝐾𝐾 𝑖𝑖=1 𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖= 𝑃𝑃𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑟𝑟 The development’s per capita VMT and per worker VMT reduction across these three categories should be capped at the levels shown in Table 8. Table 8. Physical Cross-Category Maxima Cross-Category Maximum Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural Per Capita / Employee VMT Reduction 70% 35% 35% 15% 15% 15% 15% August 27, 2020 Page 30 of 32 1.2.6.3 Programmatic Cross-Category Maxima For the programmatic measures, per capita and per employment VMT reductions are capped to a 25 percent maximum. 1.2.6.4 Global Maxima Across physical and programmatic categories, per capita and per worker VMT reductions are capped to maxima based on neighborhood place type, as shown in Table 9. Like the category maximums, the physical and programmatic categories are combined using multiplicative dampening to ensure reductions are not double counted. The reductions are calculated as noted below. 𝐶𝐶𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑅𝑅𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=1 − �(1 −𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖)𝐾𝐾 𝑖𝑖=1 Table 9. Global Maxima Cross-Category Maximum Neighborhood Place Type Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing Suburb w/ Single Family Homes Rural in Urbanized Area Rural Per Capita / Employee VMT Reduction 75% 40% 40% 20% 20% 20% 20% August 27, 2020 Page 31 of 32 2. VMT Reduction Strategies Dependencies As noted in the descriptions of the individual VMT reduction strategies in Section 1.2, a number of reduction strategies overlap with each other. For instance, a strategy may consist of a basket of measures which may overlap with some of the measures in another strategy. Therefore, the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool logic has been coded to reflect these dependencies, so that if one measure is chosen, other overlapping measures are not allowed. The dependencies in the tool are summarized below and are shown in the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool by greying out certain reductions so that they cannot be selected. If this strategy is chosen… This strategy is not allowed… PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities • TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education • TP 05 Implement CTR Program • TP 15 Travel behavior Change • TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program TP 05 Implement CTR Program • PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities • TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education • TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules • TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs • TP 15 Behavioral Intervention • TP 17 Vanpool Incentives • TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out • TP 10 Price Workplace Parking TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program • TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules • TP 05 Implement CTR Program TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet • TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs • TP 17 Vanpool Incentives TP 10 Price Workplace Parking • TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits • TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program August 27, 2020 Page 32 of 32 If this strategy is chosen… This strategy is not allowed… TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs • TP 05 Implement CTR Program • TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet • TP 17 Vanpool Incentives TP 15 Behavioral Intervention • TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education • TP 05 Implement CTR Program • TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program TP 17 Vanpool Incentives • TP 05 Implement CTR Program • TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet • TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program • TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education • TP 05 Implement CTR Program • TP 15 Behavioral Intervention 8601 Mission Drive Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis 9 | P a g e ATTACHMENT B – SGVCOG SCREENING ANALYSIS SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report Page 1 Project Details Timestamp of Analysis: January 20, 2022, 11:49:33 PM Project Name: 8601 Mission Drive Project Description: 37 Single Family Homes Project Location Jurisdiction: Rosemead Inside a TPA? No (Fail) APN TAZ 5389-009-030 22180100 5389-009-031 22180100 Analysis Details Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model 2016 RTP Base Year 2012 Analysis Methodology: TAZ Baseline Year: 2022 Project Land Use Residential: Single Family DU: Multifamily DU: Total DUs: 0 Non-Residential: OKce bSF: Local Serving Retail bSF: Industrial bSF: Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units): Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k Very Lo% Income: 0 k Lo% Income: 0 k ParWing: Motor Vehicle ParWing: Bicycle ParWing: SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report Page 2 Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: SGVCOG Average VMT Baseline Value 1: 34/9 VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local Jurisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project F Tier 1-3 VMT Reductions .ith Project F All VMT Reductions Project Generated Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Rate 26/78 null null Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) null null DOC 6357570.D15 November 8, 2021 Ref. DOC 6338995 Mr. Marco Midence Senior Project Engineer C&V Consulting, Inc. 9830 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Dear Mr. Midence: Will Serve Letter for 8601 Mission Drive The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (Districts) received your will serve letter request for the subject project on October 8, 2021. The proposed project is located within the jurisdictional boundary of District No. 15. We offer the following comments regarding sewerage service: 1. The wastewater flow originating from the proposed project will discharge to a local sewer line, which is not maintained by the Districts, for conveyance to the Districts’ Grand Avenue Trunk Sewer, located in Mission Drive at Ivar Avenue. The Districts’ 18-inch diameter trunk sewer has a capacity of 5.9 million gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow of 0.7 mgd when last measured in 2013. 2. The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) located adjacent to the City of Industry, which has a capacity of 100 mgd and currently processes an average flow of 66.9 mgd. All biosolids and wastewater flows that exceed the capacity of the San Jose Creek WRP are diverted to and treated at the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant in the City of Carson. 3. The expected average wastewater flow from the project site, described in the application as 35 single-family homes, is 9,100 gallons per day. For a copy of the Districts’ average wastewater generation factors, go to www.lacsd.org, under Services, then Wastewater Program and Permits, select Will Serve Program, and scroll down to click on the Table 1, Loadings for Each Class of Land Use link. 4. The Districts are empowered by the California Health and Safety Code to charge a fee to connect facilities (directly or indirectly) to the Districts’ Sewerage System or to increase the strength or quantity of wastewater discharged from connected facilities. This connection fee is used by the Districts for its capital facilities. Payment of a connection fee may be required before this project is permitted to discharge to the Districts’ Sewerage System. For more information and a copy of the Connection Fee Information Sheet, go to www.lacsd.org, under Services, then Wastewater (Sewage) and select Rates & Fees. In determining the impact to the Sewerage System and applicable connection fees, the Districts will determine the user category (e.g. Condominium, Single Family home, etc.) that best represents the actual or anticipated use of the parcel(s) or facilities on the parcel(s) in the development. For more specific information regarding the connection fee application procedure and fees, the developer should contact the Districts’ Wastewater Fee Public Counter at (562) 908-4288, extension 2727. Mr. Marco Midence 2 November 8, 2021 DOC 6357570.D15 5. In order for the Districts to conform to the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the capacities of the Districts’ wastewater treatment facilities are based on the regional growth forecast adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Specific policies included in the development of the SCAG regional growth forecast are incorporated into clean air plans, which are prepared by the South Coast and Antelope Valley Air Quality Management Districts in order to improve air quality in the South Coast and Mojave Desert Air Basins as mandated by the CAA. All expansions of Districts’ facilities must be sized and service phased in a manner that will be consistent with the SCAG regional growth forecast for the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial. The available capacity of the Districts’ treatment facilities will, therefore, be limited to levels associated with the approved growth identified by SCAG. As such, this letter does not constitute a guarantee of wastewater service, but is to advise the developer that the Districts intend to provide this service up to the levels that are legally permitted and to inform the developer of the currently existing capacity and any proposed expansion of the Districts’ facilities. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (562) 908-4288, extension 2708 or at dcurry@lacsd.org. Very truly yours, Donna J. Curry Customer Service Specialist Facilities Planning Department DC:dc