Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
CC - Item 3A - Public Hearing - Attachment H with Appendices
Attachment H
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration with
Mitigation Monitoring Program (Appendices
included in USB Drive)
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
MISSION VILLAS
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
FINAL INITIAL STUDY/
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
December 2022
Lead Agency:
City of Rosemead
8838 Valley Blvd
Rosemead, CA 91770
Contact Person and Phone Number: Annie Lao, (626) 569-2144
Project Applicant:
Borstein Enterprises
8951 Research Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
2355 Main Street, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92614
Attachment "H"
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
i
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
ii
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY ................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ..................................................................................................................... 2
2 PROJECT SETTING ............................................................................................................. 3
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 EXISTING PROJECT SITE ................................................................................................................................ 3
2.3 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS .................................................................. 3
2.4 SURROUNDING LAND USE, GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS ................................. 3
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 15
4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ......................................................................................... 19
4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ....................................................................... 19
4.2 DETERMINATION ......................................................................................................................................... 20
4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS ....................................................................................... 22
1. AESTHETICS ........................................................................................................................................................ 22
2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 27
3. AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................................................... 30
4.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................. 37
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 42
6. ENERGY .............................................................................................................................................................. 46
7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ................................................................................................................................... 51
8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ................................................................................................................... 57
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................................................................... 61
10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY........................................................................................................ 66
11. LAND USE AND PLANNING ......................................................................................................................... 72
12. MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 75
13. NOISE ............................................................................................................................................................... 76
14. POPULATION AND HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 90
15. PUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................ 92
16. RECREATION ................................................................................................................................................... 96
17. TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................................................................ 98
18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 103
19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................. 106
20. WILDFIRES ..................................................................................................................................................... 112
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ......................................................................................... 114
5 GENERAL REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 118
6 DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS ............................................................ 119
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
iii
Figures
Figure 1: Regional Location ................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Figure 2: Local Vicinity ............................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Figure 3: Aerial View .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9
Figure 4a: Site Photos .......................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 4b: Site Photos .......................................................................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 5: Conceptual Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................................... 19
Figure 6a: Plan 1 Exterior Elevations Spanish Colonial ................................................................................................................ 21
Figure 6b: Plan 1 Exterior Elevations Hacienda ............................................................................................................................ 23
Figure 6c: Plan 2 Exterior Elevations Spanish Colonial ................................................................................................................ 25
Figure 6d: Plan 2 Exterior Elevations Hacienda ............................................................................................................................ 27
Figure 6e: Duplex Exterior Elevations Spanish Colonial ............................................................................................................... 29
Figure 6f: Duplex Exterior Elevations Hacienda ............................................................................................................................ 31
Figure 7: Conceptual Landscape Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 33
Figure 8: Wall and Fence Plan .......................................................................................................................................................... 35
Figure 9: Noise Measurement Locations ........................................................................................................................................... 99
Tables
Table AQ-1: SCAQMD Regional Daily Emissions Thresholds ...................................................................................................... 31
Table AQ-2: Regional Construction Emissions Summary ............................................................................................................... 32
Table AQ-3: Summary of Regional Operational Emissions ......................................................................................................... 33
Table AQ-4: Localized Construction Emissions ................................................................................................................................ 33
Table Bio-1: Potentially Occurring Plant Species .......................................................................................................................... 38
Table Bio-2: Potentially Occurring Animal Species ....................................................................................................................... 38
Table N-1: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels ...................................................................................................... 77
Table N-2: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels ...................................................................................................... 79
Table N-3: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels ...................................................................................................... 79
Table N-4: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis ..................................................................................... 79
Table N-5: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria .................................................................................................................... 79
Table N-6: Summary of 24-Hour Ambient Noise Level Measurements .................................................................................... 81
Table N-7: Construction Activity Noise Levels at 50 Feet ............................................................................................................ 85
Table N-8: Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptors ............................................................................... 86
Table N-9: Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment at 25 Feet ........................................................................... 87
Table PS-1: School Capacity and Project Generated Students ................................................................................................. 94
Table TR-1: Proposed Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................ 100
Table UT-1: District Supply Reliability – Average, Single Dry Year, & Multiple Dry Years ............................................. 108
Appendix
A Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Analysis
B General Biological Assessment
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
Cultural Resources Assessment
Preliminary Geotechincal Investigation
Paleontological Assessment
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Remedial Excavation Completion Report
Preliminary Hydrology Study
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan (LID)
Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis
Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis
Sewer Will Serve Letter
M Sewer Area Study
N MMRP
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY
This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ("IS/MND") has been prepared in accordance
with the following:
•California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (Public Resources Code Sections
21000 et seq.); and
•California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (State CEQA Guidelines,
Sections 15000 et seq.).
Pursuant to CEQA, this IS/MND has been prepared to analyze the potential for significant impacts
on the environment resulting from implementation of the proposed Project. As required by State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, this Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead
Agency, the City of Rosemead, in consultation with other jurisdictional agencies, to determine if a
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required for the
Project.
This IS/MND informs City of Rosemead decision-makers, affected agencies, and the public of
potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Project. A
“significant effect” or “significant impact” on the environment means “a substantial, or potentially
substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the Project”
(Guidelines §15382). As such, the IS/MND’s intent is to adhere to the following CEQA principles:
•Provide meaningful early evaluation of site planning constraints, service and infrastructure
requirements, and other local and regional environmental considerations. (Pub. Res. Code
§21003.1)
•Encourage the applicant to incorporate environmental considerations into Project
conceptualization, design, and planning at the earliest feasible time. (State CEQA
Guidelines §15004[b][3])
•Specify mitigation measures for reasonably foreseeable significant environmental effects
and commit Rosemead and the applicant to future measures containing performance
standards to ensure their adequacy when detailed development plans and applications are
submitted. (State CEQA Guidelines §15126.4)
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
Throughout the impact analysis in this Initial Study, reference is made to requirements that are
applied to all development on the basis of federal, state, or local law, and Existing Plans, Programs,
or Policies currently in place which effectively reduce environmental impacts. Existing Plans,
Programs, or Policies are collectively identified in this document as PPPs. Where applicable, PPPs
are listed to show their effect in reducing potential environmental impacts. Where the application
of these measures does not reduce an impact to below a level of significance, a Project-specific
mitigation measure is introduced.
Chapter 1. Public Review MND
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
2
1.2 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
This IS/MND includes the flowing sections:
Section 1.0 Introduction
Provides information about CEQA and its requirements for environmental review and explains that
an Initial Study/MND was prepared by the City of Rosemead to evaluate the proposed Project’s
potential to impact the physical environment.
Section 2.0 Project Setting
Provides information about the proposed Project’s location.
Section 3.0 Project Description
Includes a description of the proposed Project’s physical features and construction and operational
characteristics. Also includes a list of discretionary approvals that would be required by the
proposed Project.
Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist
Includes the Environmental Checklist and evaluates the proposed Project’s potential to result in
significant adverse effects to the physical environment.
Section 5.0 General References
Includes a list of general reference materials relied on in the IS/MND. Each subtopic in Section 4.0
also contains a more specific list of reference materials relied on in the topical analysis.
Section 6.0 Document Preparers and Contributors
Includes the persons that prepared this IS/MND.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
3
2 PROJECT SETTING
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The 3.435-acre Project site is located in the northwest portion of the City of Rosemead at 8601
Mission Drive. The site is located within Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 12 West as shown on
the El Monte, California 7.5-minute U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) topographic maps. The regional
location of the Project site is shown in Figure 1, Regional Location.
The Project site consists of three parcels, identified by the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers
(APNs): 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. The Project site is bounded by Mission Drive to the south,
a vacant parcel and a nursery to the west, and residential uses to the east and north. Regional
access to the Project site is provided by Interstate 10 (I-10) and Interstate State Route 19 (SR-19).
Local access to the Project site is provided by Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue. The Project
vicinity and surrounding area is shown in Figure 2, Local Vicinity.
2.2 EXISTING PROJECT SITE
The Project site is comprised of three parcels encompassing approximately 3.435 gross acres
(3.378 net acres) of land. The site is generally flat with elevations ranging from approximately
357 to 363 feet above mean sea level. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped with
some groundcover and onsite improvements. Portions of concrete driveways exist at the west and
south of the site. The perimeters of the site are bound by chain-link fencing, masonry block walls,
and plastic fencing. There are palm trees present along the northwest property boundary.
Additionally, overhead power lines exist along the southwest boundary of the site. Existing
conditions of the Project site and adjacent uses are shown in Figure 3, Aerial View and Figure 4, Site
Photos.
2.3 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential and a zoning
designation of R-1 Single Family Residential. The Low Density Residential designation is
characterized by low-density residential neighborhoods consisting primarily of detached single-
family dwellings on individual lots. The maximum permitted density within the Low Density
Residential designation is 7.0 dwelling units per acre. The R-1 zoning district identifies areas
characterized by single-family dwellings.
2.4 SURROUNDING LAND USE, GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
The Project site is located within a developed, urbanized area within the City of Rosemead as
described below:
Table 1: Surrounding Existing Land Use and Zoning Designations
Existing Land Use General Plan Designation Zoning Designation
North Single Family Residences Low Density Residential R-1- Single Family
Residential
East Single Family Residences Low Density Residential R-1- Single Family
Residential
South Mission Drive followed by
Single Family Residences Low Density Residential R-1- Single Family
Residential
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
4
West Open space Public Facilities O-S - Open Space
Figure 18601 Mission Drive
City of Rosemead
Regional Location
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
6
This page intentionally left blank.
Local Vicinity
Figure 28601 Mission Drive
City of Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
8
This page intentionally left blank.
Aerial View
Figure 38601 Mission Drive
City of Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
10
This page intentionally left blank.
Site Photos
Figure 4a8601 Mission Drive
City of Rosemead
View from the west side of the site off of Walnut Grove Ave.
Southwest corner of site from the intersecton of Walnut Grove Ave and Mission Dr.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
12
This page intentionally left blank.
Site Photos
Figure 4b8601 Mission Drive
City of Rosemead
Southeast corner of site from Mission Dr.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
14
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
15
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The proposed Project would develop the approximately 3.435-acre Project site with 37 two-story
dwelling units. The residential community would include parking, landscaping, common areas, and
associated infrastructure. The Project also requires approval of a General Plan amendment from
Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential; a zone change from R-1 Single Family
Residential to P-D Planned Development; and a tentative parcel map. Figure 5, Conceptual Site
Plan illustrated the Project as proposed.
3.2 PROJECT FEATURES
Development Summary
The proposed Project would construct 37 two-story dwelling units on the 3.37-acre parcel, which
would result in a density of 11 units per acre. The units would range in size from 1,546 square feet
(SF) to 2,553 SF and include two different single-family dwelling (SFD) plan options and two
different duplex plan options. Lots 14-32 would include backyard patios. The Project would include
4 affordable duplex units. Table 2 provides a summary of the proposed residential plans.
Table 2: Proposed Residence Plan Options
Unit Type
Square
Footage
Number of
Bedrooms Number of
Units
SFD Plan 1 2,351 4 14
SFD Plan 2 2,553 4 15
Duplex Plan 1 1,546 3 4
Duplex Plan 2 1,868 4 4
Total --- 37
Architectural Design
The proposed two-story residences would be designed with traditional architectural elements, multi-
level rooflines, and an earth tone color scheme. The residences would incorporate stucco finishes,
stone accents, decorative ceramic tiles, tiled roofs, painted shutters and decorative windows and
doors in the exterior design. The tallest roofline of the proposed residences would be
approximately 28 feet in height. Figures 6a-f, Exterior Elevations, illustrates the proposed exterior
elevations.
Recreation and Open Space
The Project would include approximately 17,298 SF of common open space that would be provided
in a central recreational area on the site. The central community open space area would include a
fire pit, seating, and an artificial turf area. Each residential unit would have a minimum of 390 SF
of private open space.
Lighting
Outdoor lighting included as part of future development on the Project site would be typical of
residential uses and would consist of wall-mounted lighting as well as pole-mounted lights along the
proposed internal roadways. Nighttime lighting would be used as accent/security lighting in the
recreation areas. All of the Project’s outdoor lighting would be directed downward and shielded to
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
16
minimize offsite spill. The location of all exterior lighting would comply with lighting standards
established in the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 17.88).
Access and Circulation
Access to the Project site would be provided via one 40-foot-wide driveway on Mission Drive. A
20-foot-wide drive aisle would provide internal circulation throughout the Project site and access
to garages and onsite parking. Pedestrian sidewalks would be installed to circulate the site and
connect to the existing right of way along Mission Drive.
Parking
The Project would include a total of 99 automobile parking spaces. Each residential unit includes an
attached, covered 2 car garage (74 spaces). An additional 25 uncovered guest parking spaces
and 2 bicycle parking spaces are proposed throughout the Project site.
Landscaping
Landscaping proposed as part of the Project would consist of ornamental trees, shrubs, and
groundcovers throughout the common areas of the development, such as along roadways, common
walls, and the recreation areas. In addition, street trees would be installed along the proposed
sidewalks throughout the Project site. The roadway entrance to the Project site would have a
landscaped median and decorative landscaping to enhance the entrance to the residential
neighborhood. Figure 7, Conceptual Landscape Plan, illustrates the proposed landscaping. The
landscape plan would be consistent with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Requirements
(Chapter 13.08).
Fences and Walls
The Project proposes to construct a 6-foot-high split-face concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall along
the perimeter of the site. The Project also proposes to construct 6-foot-high vinyl privacy fencing in
between each residential unit. The Project also proposes to construct 5-foot-high metal fences on
the east and west sides of the Project’s entrance. Figure 8, Wall and Fence Plan, illustrates the
proposed walls and fences.
Infrastructure Improvements
Water
The Project would install new onsite potable water lines that would connect to existing 6-inch water
lines in Mission Drive.
Sewer
The Project would also construct onsite sewer lines that would connect to the existing 8-inch sewer
line in Mission Drive.
Drainage
The Project would install new storm drain lines throughout the site. Additionally, the Project would
install catch basins throughout the site and an underground detention system in the southern portion
of the site to collect stormwater. Additionally, multiple planter boxes would be installed for further
stormwater infiltration.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
17
3.3 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
The Project proposes a General Plan amendment to change the land use designation from Low
Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. The Medium Density Residential designation
allows for densities of up to 12 units per acre.
The Project also proposes a zone change from R-1 Single Family Residential to P-D Planned
Development. The P-D zone allows for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses
subject to regulations set forth in Section 17.24 of the Municipal Code. A zone change to a P-D
zone requires Planned Development Review, with approval of a Precise Development Plan by the
Planning Commission and City Council.
3.4 CONSTRUCTION
Construction activities for the Project would occur over two phases lasting approximately 11 months
and in the following stages: (1) grading and excavation; (2) site preparation, which includes
clearing any remaining infrastructure, utilities, and trenching for the new utilities and services; (3)
building construction; and (4) landscape installation, paving, and application of architectural
coatings. Grading would begin in March 2023 and construction would end in June 2024. The Project
would open in October 2024. Construction activities would be limited to the hours between 7:00
a.m. and 8:00 p.m., excluding Sundays and holidays, as pursuant to the City’s requirements for
noise control (Chapter 8.36)
3.5 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS AND PERMITS
The following discretionary approvals and permits are anticipated from the City of Rosemead to
be necessary for implementation of the proposed Project:
• Tentative Tract Map
• Zone Change
• General Plan Amendment
• Planned Development Review, approval of Precise Development Plan
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
18
This page intentionally left blank
8601 Mission DriveCity of RosemeadFigure 5Conceptual Site Plan1 2345
6
7
8MAIL
9
10
1112
13
20 21
22 23
24 251415
16
17
18
1938.29'42.62'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'33.48'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'38.35'76.50'
86.00'
76.62'
86.14'S89°55
'4
0"W
1
74
.1
1'
S00°56'10"E 542.70'
N00°19'33"W 254.20'
N28°55'42"
E
3
8
9
.
3
7
'S64°18'32"E 250.37'
S20°14'36"W
1
6
9
.
6
3
'N89°08
'21
"E
8
6.
93
'
20.0
14.0
8.00
15.00
15.30
17.2313.2313.76
20.0024.00
13.00
20.00
14.01
8.00
20.00
20.73
18.00
10.00
11.50
30.00
9.0
18.0
9.0
18.08.0020.00
5TYP5TYP
19.15
6.0 20.00 38.0013.0013.0020.00
24.0
0 20.0
0TYP12.1710.1714.6911.0020.00 3TYP
3TYP
21.0
10.08.013.0512.03MM SBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19
-52D
SBEPAR 2 MAP
148-19-52D 2PTSSO CALIF ED
ISON
CONO SITUSAPN: 5389-005-800QUYEN Y TO4629 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389
-009
-042
JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047
MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048
DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049
JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043
MIKE
B TO/TR
ITIA
TO4623 BARTLETT
AVEAPN: 5389
-009
-041WILLIAM
J STONECYPHER
JR4617 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-040CARLOS VILLAGRAN
/KAREN VIL
LAGRAN4613 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-039FENGYI J
S
ITU/TRACY F
SITU4607 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009
-038NGO &
BANH FAMILY
TRUSTNGO ALEXANDER D
TR4603 BARTLETT
AVEAPN: 5389-009-037
JASON SAM
/FRAUST
INA
SAM4549 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-036
LA
IRD ANDERSON/DONNA B ANDERSON4545 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-035BRYANT M TANG4539 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-034LENK TRUSTLENK JANET
M
TR4535 BARTLETT
AVEAPN: 5389
-009-033KOKICHI NAKAZAWA
/SUMIE NAKAZAWA4529 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-032SANDY H WU8639 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-026DE HONG8637 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-028DUBOIS FAMILY TRUSTDUBOIS WAYNE A &DOROTHY A TRS8635 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-02740
40
80
32
32
8
8
6.0
16.0
DU5DU9DU7DU10DU11DU12DU13DU14DU15DU16DU17DU20DU21DU22DU23DU32DU33DU31DU34DU35DU24DU25DU26DU27DU28DU29DU30DU18DU19DU1DU2DU3DU6DU4DU8DU36DU37L01
L02
L03TYP
L05
L06
L07TYP
L08TYP L04TYPC01C02
C02
C02
L05
P01TYP
W01TYP
A0.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L ICA N TP RO JECTDRAW INGSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESN500100150ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN &PROJECT STATISTICSARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANSFDPLAN 12,351 sfSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDASFDPLAN 22,553 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 11,546 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 21,868 sfVICINITY MAPPROJECT SUMMARY:·OWNER / APPLICANT:BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC.11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025·CONTACT:ERIK PFAHLERerik@borsteinenterprises.com310.582.1991 x203·APN:5389-009-029, 030, 031·ZONING:··CURRENT:R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:P-D·GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION··EXISTING:LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL·PROJECT SIZE:··GROSS SF:3.435 AC (149,929 SF)··NET SF:3.378 AC (147,146 SF)·LOT SIZE / F.A.R. / LOT COVERAGE:··LOT 1 (DU 9-37) : 127,151 SF / 67.1% / 43.0%··LOT 2 (DU 4):3,089 SF / 76.8% / 39.5%··LOT 3 (DU 3):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 4 (DU 2):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 5 (DU 1):2,809 SF / 84.5% / 43.5%··LOT 6 (DU 5):3,095 SF / 76.7% / 39.5%··LOT 7 (DU 6):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 8 (DU 7):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 9 (DU 8):2,499 SF / 95.0% / 48.9%·TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNITS:37 DU··SFD PLAN 1:14 DU··SFD PLAN 2:15 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 1:4 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 2:4 DU·DENSITY:10.95 DU/AC• OPEN SPACE AREA: 17,298 SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS·PARKING:··GARAGE:74 SPACES··GUEST:25 SPACES··BICYCLE:2 SPACES·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE VB·OCCUPANCY:R-3 SFD/DUPLEX (CRC)·PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:VARIES: MIN. 390 SF / DU ACHIEVED·SCHOOL DISTRICT:ROSEMEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT3907 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD #220ROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.312.2900·ELECTRICAL SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONP.O. BOX 6400RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729800.655.4555·GAS SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYP.O. BOX CMONTEREY PARK, CA 91756800.427.2200·WATER SERVICE:CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY8657 GRAND AVENUEROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.614.2500REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.SITE PLAN LEGENDFIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESSFIRE HYDRANT (3 PROPOSED)BICYCLE RACK
(2 SPACES)CENTRAL COMMON OPEN SPACE1,644
TOT. SF
/
1
.1%
W
ITH
IN
PROJECT
LIM
ITSSURFACING
: TURFOTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE15,654
TOT
. SF
/ 10
.6%
WITH
IN
PROJECT L
IM
ITSSURFACING
: COMMON AREA
LANDSCAP
INGTOTAL OPEN SPACE17,298
TOT
. SF
/ 11
.8%
WITH
IN
PROJECT L
IM
ITSREAR YARD AREAS34,359
TOT
. SF
/ 23
.4% WITH
IN
PROJECT L
IM
ITSCITY PARKWAY LANDSCAPE489 TOT. SF
/ 0.3
%
W
ITH
IN
PROJECT
LIM
ITSSURFACING
: PARKWAY
LANDSCAP
INGTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA51,470
TOT
. SF
/ 34
.5% WITH
IN
PROJECT L
IM
ITSR.O.W. HARDSCAPE1,383
TOT. SF
/
0
.9%
W
ITH
IN
PROJECT
LIM
ITSSURFACING
: NATURAL COLORED
CONCRETEDRIVE AISLE HARDSCAPE30,810
TOT
. SF
/ 20
.9% OF
PROJECTSURFACING
: NATURAL COLORED
CONCRETEHARDSCAPE (SIDEWALKS)9,578
TOT. SF
/ 6
.5%
WITH
IN
PROJECT L
IM
ITSSURFACING
: NATURAL COLORED
CONCRETETOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA40,388
TOT
. SF
/ 27
.1% WITH
IN
PROJECT L
IM
ITS6ft HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM WALL
w/ 4inHIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM CAPPARKING STALLS TO BE STRIPED PERCITY MUN
ICIPAL CODE SECT
ION17.112.111HTRASH COLLECTION BIN LOCATION PERREPUBLIC SERVICES WILL SERVELETTERC01C02L01L02L03L04L05L06L07L08L09P01W01DWELLING UNIT LEGENDSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDA12 34 56 78MAIL 9 101112132021 22 23242514151617181938.29'42.62'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'33.48'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'38.35'76.50'86.00'76.62'86.14'S89°55'40"W 174.11'S00°56'10"E 542.70'N00°19'33"W 254.20'N28°55'42"E 389.37'S64°18'32"E 250.37'S20°14'36"W 169.63'N89°08'21"E 86.93'20.014.0 8.0015.0015.3017.2313.2313.7620.0024.0013.0020.0014.01 8.0020.00 20.7318.0010.00 11.5030.00 9.018.09.018.08.0020.005TYP5TYP 19.156.0 20.00 38.0013.0013.0020.0024.00 20.00TYP12.1710.1714.6911.0020.00 3TYP3TYP21.0 10.08.013.0512.03MMSBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19-52D SBEPAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTSSO CALIF EDISON CONO SITUSAPN: 5389-005-800QUYEN Y TO4629 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-042JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043MIKE B TO/TRITIA TO4623 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-041WILLIAM J STONECYPHER JR4617 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-040CARLOS VILLAGRAN/KAREN VILLAGRAN4613 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-039FENGYI J SITU/TRACY F SITU4607 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-038NGO & BANH FAMILY TRUSTNGO ALEXANDER D TR4603 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-037JASON SAM/FRAUSTINA SAM4549 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-036LAIRD ANDERSON/DONNA B ANDERSON4545 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-035BRYANT M TANG4539 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-034LENK TRUSTLENK JANET M TR4535 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-033KOKICHI NAKAZAWA/SUMIE NAKAZAWA4529 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-032SANDY H WU8639 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-026DE HONG8637 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-028DUBOIS FAMILY TRUSTDUBOIS WAYNE A &DOROTHY A TRS8635 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-0274040803232886.016.0 DU5DU9DU7DU10DU11DU12DU13DU14DU15DU16DU17DU20DU21DU22DU23DU32DU33DU31DU34DU35DU24DU25DU26DU27DU28DU29DU30DU18DU19DU1DU2DU3DU6DU4DU8DU36DU37L01 L02L03TYPL05L06 L07TYPL08TYP L04TYPC01C02C02 C02L05P01TYPW01TYP
A0.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L ICA N TP RO JECTDRAW INGSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESN500100150ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN &PROJECT STATISTICSARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANSFDPLAN 12,351 sfSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDASFDPLAN 22,553 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 11,546 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 21,868 sfVICINITY MAPPROJECT SUMMARY:·OWNER / APPLICANT:BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC.11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025·CONTACT:ERIK PFAHLERerik@borsteinenterprises.com310.582.1991 x203·APN:5389-009-029, 030, 031·ZONING:··CURRENT:R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:P-D·GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION··EXISTING:LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL·PROJECT SIZE:··GROSS SF:3.435 AC (149,929 SF)··NET SF:3.378 AC (147,146 SF)·LOT SIZE / F.A.R. / LOT COVERAGE:··LOT 1 (DU 9-37) : 127,151 SF / 67.1% / 43.0%··LOT 2 (DU 4):3,089 SF / 76.8% / 39.5%··LOT 3 (DU 3):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 4 (DU 2):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 5 (DU 1):2,809 SF / 84.5% / 43.5%··LOT 6 (DU 5):3,095 SF / 76.7% / 39.5%··LOT 7 (DU 6):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 8 (DU 7):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 9 (DU 8):2,499 SF / 95.0% / 48.9%·TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNITS:37 DU··SFD PLAN 1:14 DU··SFD PLAN 2:15 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 1:4 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 2:4 DU·DENSITY:10.95 DU/AC• OPEN SPACE AREA: 17,298 SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS·PARKING:··GARAGE:74 SPACES··GUEST:25 SPACES··BICYCLE:2 SPACES·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE VB·OCCUPANCY:R-3 SFD/DUPLEX (CRC)·PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:VARIES: MIN. 390 SF / DU ACHIEVED·SCHOOL DISTRICT:ROSEMEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT3907 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD #220ROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.312.2900·ELECTRICAL SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONP.O. BOX 6400RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729800.655.4555·GAS SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYP.O. BOX CMONTEREY PARK, CA 91756800.427.2200·WATER SERVICE:CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY8657 GRAND AVENUEROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.614.2500REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.SITE PLAN LEGENDFIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESSFIRE HYDRANT (3 PROPOSED)BICYCLE RACK (2 SPACES)CENTRAL COMMON OPEN SPACE1,644 TOT.
SF
/ 1.1% W
ITH
IN PROJECT
L
IMITSSURFACING: TURFOTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE15,654 TOT. SF /
10.6%
WITHIN PROJECT LIM
ITSSURFACING: COMMON AREA LANDSCAP
INGTOTAL OPEN SPACE17,298 TOT. SF /
11.8%
WITHIN PROJECT LIM
ITSREAR YARD AREAS34,359 TOT
. SF /
23.4%
WITHIN
PROJECT LIM
ITSCITY PARKWAY LANDSCAPE489 TOT. SF / 0.3 %
WITH
IN
PROJECT
LIM
ITSSURFACING: PARKWAY LANDSCAP
INGTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA51,470 TOT
. SF /
34.5%
WITHIN
PROJECT LIM
ITSR.O.W. HARDSCAPE1,383 TOT.
SF
/ 0.9% W
ITH
IN PROJECT
L
IMITSSURFACING: NATURAL
COLORED
CONCRETEDRIVE AISLE HARDSCAPE30,810 TOT
. SF /
20.9%
OF PROJECTSURFACING: NATURAL
COLORED
CONCRETEHARDSCAPE (SIDEWALKS)9,578 TOT. SF
/ 6.5% W
ITHIN PROJECT
L
IMITSSURFACING: NATURAL
COLORED
CONCRETETOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA40,388 TOT
. SF /
27.1%
WITHIN
PROJECT LIM
ITS6ft HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM WALL w/ 4inHIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM CAPPARKING STALLS TO BE STRIPED PERCITY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION17.112.111HTRASH COLLECTION BIN LOCATION PERREPUBLIC SERVICES WILL SERVELETTERC01C02L01L02L03L04L05L06L07L08L09P01W01DWELLING UNIT LEGENDSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDA1 23 456 78
MAIL
9 10111213
20 21 22 23
24 2514151617181938.29'42.62'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'33.48'26.17'26.17'32.67'32.67'26.17'26.17'38.35'76.50'86.00'76.62'86.14'
S89
°55
'4
0"W
174
.1
1'
S00°56'10"E 542.70'
N00°19'33"W 254.20'N28°55'42"E 389.37'S64°18'32"E 250.37'S20°14'36"W
1
6
9
.
6
3
'N89°
08
'21
"E
86
.9
3'
20.014.0
8.00
15.00
15.
30
17.2313.2313.76
20.0024.0013.0
0
20.00 14.01
8.00
20.00
20.7318.0010.00 11.5030.00
9.0
18.0
9.018.08.0020.00
5TYP5TYP
19.15
6.0 20.00 38.0013.0013.0020.0024.00 20.00TYP12.1710.1714.6911.0020.00 3TYP3TYP21.0 10.08.013.0512.03MMSBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19-52D SBEPAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTSSO CALIF EDISON CONO SITUSAPN: 5389-005-800QUYEN Y
TO4629 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389
-009-042
JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047
MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048
DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049
JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043
MIKE
B TO/TRIT
IA
TO4623 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-041WILLIAM
J STONECYPHER
JR4617 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-040CARLOS VILLAGRAN/KAREN VILLAGRAN4613 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-039FENGYI J SITU/TRACY
F SITU4607 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389
-009-038NGO & BANH
FAMILY TRUSTNGO ALEXANDER D TR4603 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-037JASON SAM/FRAUSTINA SAM4549 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-036LAIRD
ANDERSON
/DONNA B ANDERSON4545 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389
-009-035BRYANT M TANG4539 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-034LENK TRUSTLENK JANET M
TR4535 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-033KOKICHI NAKAZAWA/SUMIE NAKAZAWA4529 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-032SANDY H WU8639 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-026DE HONG8637 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-028DUBOIS FAMILY TRUSTDUBOIS WAYNE A &DOROTHY A TRS8635 MISSION DRAPN: 5389-009-0274040803232 88 6.016.0 DU5DU9DU7DU10DU11DU12DU13DU14DU15DU16DU17DU20DU21DU22DU23DU32DU33DU31DU34DU35DU24DU25DU26DU27DU28DU29DU30DU18DU19DU1DU2DU3DU6DU4DU8DU36DU37L01L02
L03TYPL05L06
L07TYP
L08TYP
L04TYPC01C02C02
C02L05P01TYPW01TYP
A0.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L ICA N TP RO JECTDRAW INGSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESN500100150ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN &PROJECT STATISTICSARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANSFDPLAN 12,351 sfSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDASFDPLAN 22,553 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 11,546 sf"DUPLEX"PLAN 21,868 sfVICINITY MAPPROJECT SUMMARY:·OWNER / APPLICANT:BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC.11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025·CONTACT:ERIK PFAHLERerik@borsteinenterprises.com310.582.1991 x203·APN:5389-009-029, 030, 031·ZONING:··CURRENT:R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:P-D·GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION··EXISTING:LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL··PROPOSED:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL·PROJECT SIZE:··GROSS SF:3.435 AC (149,929 SF)··NET SF:3.378 AC (147,146 SF)·LOT SIZE / F.A.R. / LOT COVERAGE:··LOT 1 (DU 9-37) : 127,151 SF / 67.1% / 43.0%··LOT 2 (DU 4):3,089 SF / 76.8% / 39.5%··LOT 3 (DU 3):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 4 (DU 2):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%··LOT 5 (DU 1):2,809 SF / 84.5% / 43.5%··LOT 6 (DU 5):3,095 SF / 76.7% / 39.5%··LOT 7 (DU 6):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 8 (DU 7):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%··LOT 9 (DU 8):2,499 SF / 95.0% / 48.9%·TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNITS:37 DU··SFD PLAN 1:14 DU··SFD PLAN 2:15 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 1:4 DU··DUPLEX PLAN 2:4 DU·DENSITY:10.95 DU/AC• OPEN SPACE AREA: 17,298 SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS·PARKING:··GARAGE:74 SPACES··GUEST:25 SPACES··BICYCLE:2 SPACES·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE VB·OCCUPANCY:R-3 SFD/DUPLEX (CRC)·PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:VARIES: MIN. 390 SF / DU ACHIEVED·SCHOOL DISTRICT:ROSEMEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT3907 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD #220ROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.312.2900·ELECTRICAL SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONP.O. BOX 6400RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729800.655.4555·GAS SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYP.O. BOX CMONTEREY PARK, CA 91756800.427.2200·WATER SERVICE:CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY8657 GRAND AVENUEROSEMEAD, CA 91770626.614.2500REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.SITE PLAN LEGENDFIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESSFIRE HYDRANT (3 PROPOSED)BICYCLE RACK (2 SPACES)CENTRAL COMMON OPEN SPACE1,644
TOT.
SF
/ 1
.1% W
ITH
IN
PROJECT L
IMITSSURFACING: TURFOTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE15,654 TOT.
SF
/ 10.6%
WITHIN PROJECT LIMITSSURFACING: COMMON AREA
LANDSCAP
INGTOTAL OPEN SPACE17,298 TOT.
SF
/ 11.8%
WITHIN PROJECT LIMITSREAR YARD AREAS34,359 TOT.
SF
/ 23.4%
WITHIN PROJECT LIMITSCITY PARKWAY LANDSCAPE489 TOT. SF
/ 0.3
% W
ITH
IN
PROJECT
LIM
ITSSURFACING: PARKWAY LANDSCAPINGTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA51,470 TOT.
SF
/ 34.5%
WITHIN PROJECT LIMITSR.O.W. HARDSCAPE1,383
TOT.
SF
/ 0
.9% W
ITH
IN
PROJECT L
IMITSSURFACING: NATURAL
COLORED CONCRETEDRIVE AISLE HARDSCAPE30,810 TOT.
SF
/ 20.9%
OF
PROJECTSURFACING: NATURAL
COLORED CONCRETEHARDSCAPE (SIDEWALKS)9,578
TOT.
SF
/ 6
.5% W
ITH
IN
PROJECT L
IMITSSURFACING: NATURAL
COLORED CONCRETETOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA40,388 TOT.
SF
/ 27.1%
WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS6ft HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM WALL w/ 4inHIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM CAPPARKING STALLS TO BE STRIPED PERCITY MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION17.112.111HTRASH COLLECTION BIN LOCATION PERREPUBLIC SERVICES WILL SERVELETTERC01C02L01L02L03L04L05L06L07L08L09P01W01DWELLING UNIT LEGENDSPANISHCOLONIALHACIENDA
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
20
This page intentionally left blank.
8601 Mission DriveCity of RosemeadFigure 6aPlan 1 Exterior Elevations (Spanish Colonial)9'-1"9'-1"
25'-3"1003054102002102152151111403005001017104101003003052104105002001101014:124:124:12 4:124:12 4:124:124:124:124:12 4:124:12 4:12
410500100210410101100210410200101A1.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L
I
CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN
GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESSPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN40812FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONROOF PLANPLAN 1 SFDEXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHEXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC TILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
22
This page intentionally left blank.
8601 Mission DriveCity of RosemeadFigure 6bPlan 1 Exterior Elevations (Hacienda)9'-1"9'-1"
25'-3"10071020021041521011114030040560040010122041010030021020060040541540010111010'-11"4:124:124:12 4:12 4:12 4:124:124:12 4:124:124:12 4:12
405100210410400101100210410200101A1.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L
I
CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN
GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESHACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN40812FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONROOF PLANPLAN 1 SFDEXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHEXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC TILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
24
This page intentionally left blank.
8601 Mission DriveCity of RosemeadFigure 6cPlan 2 Exterior Elevations (Spanish Colonial)9'-1"9'-1"
27'-2"1003054102002107002151111403005004101017104101003003052104105002005001011104:124:124:12 4:124:124:124:124:12 4:12
410500100210410305101100210410200300101A2.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L
I
CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN
GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESSPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN40812FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONROOF PLANPLAN 2 SFDEXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHEXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC TILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
26
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission VillasCity of RosemeadFigure 6dPlan 2 Exterior Elevations (Hacienda)9'-1"9'-1"
27'-2"1007102002106002101111403004054007102151012204101003002102006004004057101011104:124:124:12 4:124:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:12
710210410400100215101100210410200400300101A2.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L
I
CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN
GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESHACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN40812FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONROOF PLANPLAN 2 SFDEXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHEXTERIOR STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS400: EXTERIOR WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE CERAMIC TILEDECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
28
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission VillasCity of RosemeadFigure 6eDuplex Exterior Elevations (Spanish Colonial)1401409'-1"9'-1"
27'-10"
9'-1"9'-1"
27'-10"100410305500300210200111210140410101200700100305410300500210101110100300500305410210101215200200700100305410300500210410110101A3.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L
I
CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN
GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESSPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS40812FRONT ELEVATIONDUPLEXENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 2)REAR / MISSION DRIVE ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 1)EXTERIOR ELEVAT
ION MATER
IAL
LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S'
ROOF T
ILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE
DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO F
IN
ISHEXTERIOR
STUCCO F
IN
ISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX
GABLE END
VENTS400: EXTERIOR
WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE
CERAMIC
T
ILEDECORATIVE
PRECAST
GABLE
END DETA
IL 100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
30
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission VillasCity of RosemeadFigure 6fDuplex Exterior Elevations (Hacienda)1401409'-1"9'-1"
27'-10"
9'-1"9'-1"
27'-10"100400405300210200111210140400101600210200220100710300405210101600110415100300405710210101415200600200220100710300405210110400210101A3.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354949 939 1310www.architeyk.comA P P L
I
CA N TP RO JECTDRAWIN
GSDATESHEET NO.JOB NO.A RCH I T E Y K29222 DAKOTA DRIVELICENSEDARCHITECTC-31873STATEOFCALIFORNIAREN.10-31-23 EVERITT KANG8601-8623 MISSION DRIVEROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIABE-21-00122051611766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025310.582.1991BORSTEIN ENTERPRISESHACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS40812FRONT ELEVATIONDUPLEXENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 2)REAR / MISSION DRIVE ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 1)EXTERIOR ELEVAT
ION MATER
IAL
LEGEND100: BUILDING COMPONENTSCONCRETE 'S'
ROOF T
ILEWOOD FASCIA BOARDENTRY DOORMETAL SECTIONAL GARAGE
DOORBUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE200: EXTERIOR STUCCO F
IN
ISHEXTERIOR
STUCCO F
IN
ISHSTUCCO o/ FOAM TRIMSTUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELSSTUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM300: PAINTED DETAILSPAINTED SHUTTERPAINTED FOAM FAUX
GABLE END
VENTS400: EXTERIOR
WOODRAFTER TAILPOT SHELFOUTLOOKER / BRACKETCORBEL500: EXTERIOR METALPOT SHELF600: EXTERIOR VENEERSADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER700: MISCELLANEOUSDECORATIVE
CERAMIC
T
ILEDECORATIVE
PRECAST
GABLE
END DETA
IL 100101110111140200210215220300305400405410415500600700710
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
32
This page intentionally left blank
Mission Villas City of RosemeadFigure 7Conceptual Landscape PlanSchematic Landscape Plan8601-8623 Mission Drive, Rosemead,CABORSTEIN ENTERPRISESProject No.: EBU02Date: April 6, 20222nd City SubmittalMISSION VILLAS 80'Scale: 1" = 40'-0"040'20'1. Central Community Open Space area with a fire tab
le and adirondack seating area forsocial events and/or group gatherings, and Turf Area with bench seat for passive & activeplay.2. Main Pro
ject Entry: Enhanced veh
icular paving with palms and specimen trees. Refer toSheet L-2 Entry Enlargement Plan.3. Vehicular S
liding Gates.4. Entry Kiosk.5. Community bench at open space.6. Dog Bag Station. Color: Black.7. (3) Community Cluster Mailboxes and (1) Parcel Locker, per USPS review and approval.8. Enhanced Paving at Main Project Entry.9. Monument Signage at Project Entry.10. Proposed tree, per Planting Plan.11. Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per Wall & Fence Plan.12. 4' wide community natural colored concrete sidewalk, with broom finish and saw-cut
joints.13. 4' wide unit entry natural colored concrete wa
lk, with broom finish and saw-cut joints.14. Natural colored concrete driveway, with
light broom finish and tooled
joints.15. Private patio / yard area, homeowner maintained.16. Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained.17. Property line.18. Public street R.O.W.19. Ex
isting publ
ic street sidewalk, per Civil plans.21. Residential/Guest parking stall.22. Utilities per Civil plans.23. Temporary Bicyc
le Parking (1 stall for 2 bikes)24. Privacy Hedge, per P
lanting Plan.LEGEND15111310161084921111111112710141515111115102424181719212111610161661072323*Conceptual images (provided herein are conceptual and subject to change)ENTRY ENLARGEMENTL2115'-0"8'-5"2'-5"5'-0"Mission DriveLimit of Work
Limit of Work
Limit of WorkLimit of Work2416Schematic Landscape Plan8601-8623 Mission Drive, Rosemead,CABORSTEIN ENTERPRISESProject No.: EBU02Date: April 6, 20222nd City SubmittalMISSION VILLAS 80'Scale: 1" = 40'-0"040'20'1. Central Community Open Space area with a fire table and adirondack seating area forsocial events and/or group gatherings, and Turf Area with bench seat for passive & activeplay.2. Main Project Entry: Enhanced vehicular paving with palms and specimen trees. Refer toSheet L-2 Entry Enlargement Plan.3. Vehicular Sliding Gates.4. Entry Kiosk.5. Community bench at open space.6. Dog Bag Station. Color: Black.7. (3) Community Cluster Mailboxes and (1) Parcel Locker, per USPS review and approval.8. Enhanced Paving at Main Project Entry.9. Monument Signage at Project Entry.10. Proposed tree, per Planting Plan.11. Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per Wall & Fence Plan.12. 4' wide community natural colored concrete sidewalk, with broom finish and saw-cut joints.13. 4' wide unit entry natural colored concrete walk, with broom finish and saw-cut joints.14. Natural colored concrete driveway, with light broom finish and tooled joints.15. Private patio / yard area, homeowner maintained.16. Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained.17. Property line.18. Public street R.O.W.19. Existing public street sidewalk, per Civil plans.21. Residential/Guest parking stall.22. Utilities per Civil plans.23. Temporary Bicycle Parking (1 stall for 2 bikes)24. Privacy Hedge, per Planting Plan.LEGEND15111310161084921111111112710141515111115102424181719212111610161661072323*Conceptual images (provided herein are conceptual and subject to change)ENTRY ENLARGEMENTL2115'-0"8'-5"2'-5"5'-0"Mission DriveLimit of Work
Limit of Work
Limit of WorkLimit of Work2416
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
34
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission VillasCity of RosemeadFigure 8Wall and Fence PlanGAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE5 9710111213141516172021222332333134352425262728293018191236483637Limit of WorkLimit of W
o
r
k
Limit o
f
W
o
r
k
Limit of Work Limit of WorkMMM I S S I O N D R.////////////
//
//
//WALL LEGEND6'-0" High Split-face CMU Wall, with 4" High Split-face CMU Cap (Color: Tan).6'-0" High Vinyl private yard Fence (Color: White)5'-0" High T. S. Metal Fence (Color: Black).6'-6" High (24" sq.) Stone veneer over CMU pilaster, with Precast cap (Stone Veneer:To match Architecture; Cap Color: Tan).5'-6" High Vinyl private yard Gate (Color: White).ADA Path of Travel.Schematic Wall & Fence Plan8601-8623 Mission Drive, Rosemead,CABORSTEIN ENTERPRISESProject No.: EBU02Date: April 6, 20222nd City SubmittalMISSION VILLAS 80'Scale: 1" = 40'-0"040'20'NOTES:1. Perimeter walls to be examined in field to determineif existing walls will remain or be replaced.2. Minimum setbacks required per RMC Table17.24.030.2:- Side Yard (East Side Adjoining Residential Zone): 5feet of 10% of the lot width, whichever is greater.- Side Yard (West Side): None (Please note thatSouthern California Edison may have setback requirements due to high-voltage transmission linesadjacent to the project site.- Rear Yard: 5 feet of 10% of the lot width, whicheveris greater.GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLEGAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLEGASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLEGAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE5 9710111213141516172021222332333134352425262728293018191236483637Limit of WorkLimit of
W
o
r
k
Limit of Work
Limit of Work Limit of WorkMMM I S S I O N D R.//
//
//////
//
//
//
//WALL LEGEND6'-0" High Split-face CMU Wall, with 4" High Split-face CMU Cap (Color: Tan).6'-0" High Vinyl private yard Fence (Color: White)5'-0" High T. S. Metal Fence (Color: Black).6'-6" High (24" sq.) Stone veneer over CMU pilaster, with Precast cap (Stone Veneer:To match Architecture; Cap Color: Tan).5'-6" High Vinyl private yard Gate (Color: White).ADA Path of Travel.Schematic Wall & Fence Plan8601-8623 Mission Drive, Rosemead,CABORSTEIN ENTERPRISESProject No.: EBU02Date: April 6, 20222nd City SubmittalMISSION VILLAS 80'Scale: 1" = 40'-0"040'20'NOTES:1. Perimeter walls to be examined in field to determineif existing walls will remain or be replaced.2. Minimum setbacks required per RMC Table17.24.030.2:- Side Yard (East Side Adjoining Residential Zone): 5feet of 10% of the lot width, whichever is greater.- Side Yard (West Side): None (Please note thatSouthern California Edison may have setback requirements due to high-voltage transmission linesadjacent to the project site.- Rear Yard: 5 feet of 10% of the lot width, whicheveris greater.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
36
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
19
4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
This section includes the completed environmental checklist form. The checklist form is used to assist
in evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project. The checklist form
identifies potential Project effects as follows: 1) Potentially Significant Impact; 2) Less Than
Significant with Mitigation Incorporated; 3) Less Than Significant Impact; and, 4) No Impact.
Substantiation and clarification for each checklist response is provided in Section 5 (Environmental
Evaluation). Included in the discussion for each topic are standard condition/regulations and
mitigation measures, if necessary, that are recommended for implementation as part of the
proposed Project.
4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below () would be potentially affected by this Project,
involving at least one impact that is “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated
by the checklist on the following pages.
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
Aesthetics Agriculture and Forest Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils/Paleontological Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of
Significance
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
20
4.2 DETERMINATION
(To be completed by the Lead Agency) on the basis of this initial evaluation
I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been
made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has
been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions
or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required.
Signature Date
City of Rosemead
Printed Name For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses
following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to Projects like the one
involved (e.g., the Project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should
be explained where it is based on Project-specific factors as well as general standards
(e.g., the Project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a Project-specific
screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-
site, cumulative as well as Project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well
as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the
checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
21
significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is
appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are
one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR
is required.
4) “Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies
where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially
Significant Impact” to a “Less Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the
mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant
level (mitigation measures from “Earlier Analysis,” as described in (5) below, may be cross-
referenced).
5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.
Section 15063 (c)(3)(d). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
(a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
(b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
(c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation
Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated
or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-
specific conditions for the Project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information
sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a
previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference
to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however,
lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to
a Project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The analysis of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold used to
evaluate each question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the
impact to less than significance.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
22
4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
1. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public
Resources Code Section 21099 would the Project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade
the existing visual character or quality of public
views of the site and its surroundings? (public
views are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If the Project
is in an urbanized area, would the Project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No Impact. Scenic vistas consist of expansive, panoramic views of important, unique, or highly
valued visual features that are seen from public viewing areas. This definition combines visual
quality with information about view exposure to describe the level of interest or concern that viewers
may have for the quality of a particular view of visual setting.
The Project site is within an urbanized developed area of the City of Rosemead. The site is
surrounded by single family residences to the north, east, south, and open space to the west. Existing
public vantage points exist along roadways that surround the Project site, which do not contain
scenic vistas. Due to the existing one and two-story development surrounding the Project site and a
flat topography, the views surrounding the Project site are limited to roadway corridor views of
developed areas along Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue with powerlines along Walnut
Grove Avenue.
The Project would develop the site and construct new two-story residential structures that would be
the same height or one story higher than the residential structures that are located to the east, north,
and south of the site. In addition, the new residential buildings would be setback 30-feet from
Mission Drive and the proposed 6-foot-high wall would be setback 16-feet from Mission Drive and
the proposed structures on the site would not encroach into views along the urban roadway corridor.
Also, the area is urban and there are no existing scenic vistas. Thus, development of the Project site
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
23
with two-story residential buildings would not obstruct, interrupt, or diminish a scenic vista; and
impacts would not occur.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. The nearest Officially Designated State Scenic Highway is a portion of State Route
110 (SR-110), which is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Project site and is not visible
from the Project site. (Caltrans 2022). Therefore, no impacts to scenic resources within a state scenic
highway would occur.
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of
public views of the site and its surroundings? (public views are those that are experienced
from publicly accessible vantage point). If the Project is in an urbanized area, would the
Project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within an urbanized area of the City of
Rosemead, along Mission Drive and is surrounded by residential and open space. The Project site
is vacant and undeveloped with some groundcover and onsite improvements. Public views of the
Project site from the street are limited to views of chain-link and picket fencing surrounding the
Project site with scattered palm trees throughout the site as shown on Figure 4a and 4b, Site Photos.
The Project would develop the Project to provide 37 two-story dwelling units as shown in Figure 5,
Conceptual Site Plan. The architectural design of the proposed buildings is characterized as
traditional architectural elements, multi-level rooflines, and an earth tone color scheme. The Project
would utilize concrete roof tile, metal sectional garage doors, exterior stucco finish with foam trim,
painted shutters, and exterior wood as shown in Figures 6a through 6f, Exterior Elevations. Large
residential windows, sidewalks, and landscaping would provide a residential character.
A 6-foot-high block wall is proposed to be located along the frontage of the Project site along
Mission Drive and along the boundary of the Project site. The wall would be setback 16 feet from
the right of way with landscape improvements within the setback, as shown in Figure 5, Conceptual
Site Plan. Therefore, forefront public views of the site would be primarily of the new landscaping,
decorative wall, and the driveway with enhanced pavement along Mission Drive.
General Plan. The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential
which consists primarily of detached single-family dwellings on individual lots and allows for a
maximum permitted density of 7.0 dwelling units per acre. As part of the Project, a General Plan
Amendment is proposed to change the land use designation of the site to Medium Density
Residential, which allows for up to 12 units per acre. Housing types within this density range include
single-family homes on smaller lots, duplexes, and attached units. The proposed Project would result
in a density of 11 units per acre, which would not exceed the allowable density for the proposed
land use designation. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an applicable General Plan
land use regulation related to scenic quality, and impacts would be less than significant.
Zoning. The Project site is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. Section 17.12.010
describes the R-1 zoning district as areas characterized by single-family dwellings. The Project
includes a zone change to Planned Development (P-D). The P-D zone is intended to provide for
residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional developments that are characterized by
innovative use and design concepts. This zone provides for a new development to offer amenities,
quality, design excellence and other similar benefits to the community and not be inhibited by strict
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
24
numerical development standards. A P-D zone shall include a parcel of land containing not less than
one acre. The proposed density of a residential planned development shall be consistent with the
land use element of the General Plan. As detailed, in Table AES-1, the Project would be consistent
with the Municipal Code standards for the P-D zone. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with
an applicable zoning regulation related to scenic quality, and impacts would be less than significant.
Table AES-1: Consistency with Proposed Zoning Development Standards
Development Feature P-D Zoning Requirement Proposed Project Consistency
Minimum Lot Area 1 acre Consistent. The proposed Project site is 3.38
net acres which exceeds the 1 acre minimum.
Minimum Lot Width None Consistent. The Project site has varying lot
widths and lot sizes ranging from 2,002 SF
to 127,151 SF
Maximum Density 12 DU/Acre Consistent. The Project proposes to have a
density of 11 DU/acre.
Setbacks
Front 10 feet Consistent The proposed Project would
provide a minimum 20-foot front setback
from Mission Drive.
Front (Adjoining Residential
Zone)
15 feet Not Applicable. The front of the proposed
Project does not adjoin a residential zone.
Side 10 feet Not Applicable.
Side 1st Floor (Adjoining
Residential Zone)
Greater of 5 ft or 10% of lot
width
Consistent. The Project would provide
minimum 13-foot side setbacks from lots
adjoining residential zones. for abutting the
Residential R zone to the east.
Side 2nd Floor 5 ft min. 15 ft combined Consistent. The Project would provide
minimum 13-foot side setbacks from lots
adjoining residential zones. for abutting the
Residential R zone to the east.
Rear 10 feet Not Applicable.
Rear (Adjoining Residential
Zone)
Greater of 5 ft or 10% of lot
width
Consistent. The Project would provide rear
setbacks from the patios that range from
6.24 feet to 15 feet.
Height None Consistent. The proposed residential
dwelling units would range from 25 feet 3
inches to 27 feet 10 inches in height.
Parking 2 spaces per dwelling unit in an
enclosed garage
Guest parking:
1 space per 2 dwelling
units
Consistent. The Project would include 74
garage spaces and 25 guest spaces which
would exceed the 19-guest space
requirement. Thus, a total of 99 spaces
would be included which exceeds the 2
spaces per dwelling unit requirement.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within a developed urban area. Existing
sources of light in the vicinity of the Project site includes: streetlights, lights from the athletic tract
adjacent to the north of the site, lighting from vehicle headlights along Mission Drive and Walnut
Grove Avenue, parking lot lighting, building illumination, security lighting, landscape lighting, and
lighting from building interiors that passthrough windows.
Construction. Although construction activities would occur primarily during daylight hours,
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
25
construction activities could extend into the evening hours, as permitted by Chapter 8.36 of the
City’s Municipal Code (permitted construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays,
including Saturday). Construction activities shall not take place on Sunday or federal holidays.
Lighting required during construction of the Project would be shielded and directed toward work
activity areas, in compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 17.88 (included as PPP AES-1) that
provides for directing lighting away from adjacent uses and intensity of security lighting. In addition,
construction may include nighttime security lighting; however, this would be similar to the surrounding
uses adjacent to the site and streetlights. Also, any construction related lighting would be temporary
(approximately 11 months). Therefore, construction of the Project would not create a new source of
substantial light that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, and light impacts
associated with construction would be less than significant.
Operation. The Project would include the provision of nighttime lighting for security purposes around
entrances, public sidewalks, open areas, and parking areas pursuant to Chapter 17.88 of the City’s
Municipal Code. The Project would introduce new sources of light with implementation of the Project.
Thus, the Project would contribute additional sources to the overall ambient nighttime lighting
conditions. However, the site is located within an urban area that includes various sources of
nighttime lighting, including the street lighting along Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue. All
outdoor lighting would be of low intensity and shielded so that light will not spill out onto surrounding
properties or Project above the horizontal plane in accordance with Chapter 17.88 of the City’s
Municipal Code (included as PPP AES-1). Because the Project area is within an already developed
area with various sources of existing nighttime lighting, and because the Project would be required
to comply with the City’s lighting regulations that would be verified by the City during the plan
check and permitting process, any increase in lighting that would be generated by the Project would
not adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Overall, lighting impacts would be less
than significant.
Reflective light (glare) can be caused by sunlight or artificial light reflecting from finished surfaces
such as window glass or other reflective materials. Generally, darker or mirrored glass would have
a higher visible light reflectance than clear glass. Buildings constructed of highly reflective materials
from which the sun reflects at a low angle can cause adverse glare. However, the Project would not
use highly reflective surfaces, or glass sided buildings. Although the building would contain windows,
the windows would be comprised of blue reflective glazing, which reduces glare over other
transparent surfaces and the windows would be separated by stucco that would limit the potential
of glare. As described previously, onsite lighting would be angled down and be compliant with
Chapter 17.88 of the City’s Municipal Code (included as PPP AES-1), which would avoid the
potential of onsite lighting generating offsite glare. Therefore, the Project would not generate
substantial sources of glare, and impacts would be less than significant.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP AES-1: Light and Glare. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 17.88, exterior lighting shall be
of low intensity and shielded so that light will not spill out onto surrounding properties or Project
above the horizontal plane.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to aesthetics are required.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
26
Sources
Caltrans State Scenic Highway System Map (Caltrans 2022). Accessed:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2e921695c43643b1aaf7
000dfcc19983
City of Rosemead General Plan. Accessed: https://cdn5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com
munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf
City of Rosemead Municipal Code. Accessed:
https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
27
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
RESOURCES. In determining whether
impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may
refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of
Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.
In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including timberland, are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may
refer to information compiled by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection regarding the state’s inventory of
forest land, including the Forest and Range
Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy
Assessment Project; and forest carbon
measurement methodology provided in Forest
Protocols adopted by the California Air
Resources Board. Would the Project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,
to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
28
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
No Impact. The Project site is vacant and undeveloped and located within an area that is largely
developed for urban uses. The Project site and its vicinity are void of agricultural uses. The California
Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program identifies the site as
urban land and it is not identified as Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (CDC
2021). Therefore, conversion of such farmland designations would not occur from implementation
of the proposed Project. No impact would occur.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
No Impact. The Project site is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential, which does not provide
for agricultural uses. In addition, the site is not subject to a Williamson Act contract. Thus, the
proposed Project would not result in impacts related to conflict with an existing agricultural zone or
Williamson contract, and impacts would not occur.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
No Impact. The Project site currently vacant and undeveloped and within an urbanized developed
area. No forest land exists on or adjacent to the Project site. The Project site is currently zoned R-1
Single Family Residential and is not zoned for forest land or timberland uses. Thus, the proposed
Project would not result in impacts related to a conflict with existing forest land or timberland zoning,
and impacts would not occur.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No Impact. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped and within an urbanized developed
area. No forest land exists on or adjacent to the Project site. Thus, the Project would not result in
the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use, and impacts would not occur.
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature,
could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
No Impact. As described above, the Project site is vacant and undeveloped and is within an
urbanized developed area. No forest land exists on or adjacent to the Project site. Therefore, the
implementation of the proposed Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment
which would result in the conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use or the conversion of forest
land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, and Policies related to agriculture and forestry that
are applicable to the Project.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
29
Mitigation Measure
No mitigation measures related to agriculture and forestry are required.
Sources
California Department of Conservation (CDC 2022). Division of Land Resource Protection.
California Important Farmland Finder. Available at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
30
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the
significance criteria established by the
applicable air quality management district or
air pollution control district may be relied upon
to make the following determinations. Would
the Project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
Project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) affecting a substantial
number of people?
The discussion below is based on the Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis,
prepared by EPD Solutions. Inc., which is included as Appendix A.
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin, which is under
the jurisdictional boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The
SCAQMD and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for
preparing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which addresses federal and state Clean Air
Act (CAA) requirements. The 2016 AQMP details goals, policies, and programs for improving air
quality in the Basin.
As described in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality
Handbook (1993), for purposes of analyzing consistency with the AQMP, if a proposed Project
would result in growth that is substantially greater than what was anticipated, then the proposed
Project would conflict with the AQMP. On the other hand, if a Project’s density is within the
anticipated growth of a jurisdiction, its emissions would be consistent with the assumptions in the
AQMP, and the Project would not conflict with SCAQMD’s attainment plans. In addition, the
SCAQMD considers Projects consistent with the AQMP if the Project would not result in an increase
in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause a new violation.
The site is an undeveloped site that is located along a minor arterial roadway that is adjacent to
residential land uses and open space. The proposed Project would develop 37 two-story dwelling
units on the site. As further described in Section 14, Population and Housing, the 37 two-story
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
31
dwelling units would result in a 1.2 percent increase in residential units within the City. This limited
level of growth would not exceed growth Projections and would be consistent with the assumptions
in the 2016 AQMP.
Also, emissions generated by construction and operation of the proposed Project would not exceed
thresholds. As described in the analysis below and detailed in Appendix A, the Project would not
result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause a new
violation. Therefore, impacts related to conflict with the 2016 AQMP from the proposed Project
would be less than significant.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
Less than Significant Impact. The South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) is in a non-attainment status for
federal ozone standards, federal carbon monoxide standards, and state and federal particulate
matter standards. Any development in the SCAB, including the proposed Project, could cumulatively
contribute to these pollutant violations. The methodologies from the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality
Handbook are used in evaluating Project impacts. SCAQMD has established daily mass thresholds
for regional pollutant emissions, which are shown in Table AQ-1. Should construction or operation
of the proposed Project exceed these thresholds a significant impact could occur; however, if
estimated emissions are less than the thresholds, impacts would be considered less than significant.
Table AQ-1: SCAQMD Regional Daily Emissions Thresholds
Pollutant Construction
(lbs/day)
Operations
(lbs/day)
NOx 100 55
VOC 75 55
PM10 150 150
PM2.5 55 55
SOx 150 150
CO 550 550
Lead 3 3
Source: Regional Thresholds presented in this table are based on the SCAQMD
Air Quality Significance Thresholds, March 2015 (revised April 2019)
Construction
Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would generate pollutant emissions from
the following construction activities: demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction,
paving, architectural coating. The amount of emissions generated on a daily basis would vary,
depending on the intensity and types of construction activities occurring. Construction activities would
generate emissions from the demolition of the onsite pavement, site preparation, grading, and
building construction. In addition, the Project would generate a need for construction worker vehicle
trips to and from the Project site during the estimated 11 months of construction.
It is mandatory for all construction Projects to comply with several SCAQMD Rules, including Rule
403 for controlling fugitive dust, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions from construction activities. Rule 403
requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the
generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground
cover as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires
and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the proposed Project site, covering all trucks hauling
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
32
soil with a fabric cover and maintaining a freeboard height of 12-inches, and maintaining effective
cover over exposed areas. Compliance with Rule 403 was accounted for in the construction emissions
modeling and is included as PPP AQ-2.
In addition, implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 that governs the VOC content in architectural
coating, paint, thinners, and solvents, would be required and is included as PPP AQ-3. As shown in
Table AQ-2, CalEEMod results provide that construction emissions generated by the proposed
Project would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Therefore, construction activities would
result in a less than significant impact.
Table AQ-2: Regional Construction Emissions Summary
Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
2023
Demolition 2.9 28.3 24.9 0.0 1.7 1.2
Site Prep 4.0 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3
Grading 2.1 20.1 20.7 0.0 2.8 1.8
Building Construction 1.4 13.1 15.7 0.0 0.6 0.6
Paving 1.1 8.5 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4
Maximum Daily
Emissions 4.0 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3
2024
Paving 1.1 8.2 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4
Architectural Coating 31.3 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Maximum Daily
Emissions 31.3 8.2 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4
Maximum Daily
Emission 2023-2024 31.3 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3
SCAQMD Significance
Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Notes: NOx = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 and PM2.5 = particular matter; ROG = reactive organic gasses; SOx = sulfur oxides Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A)
Operation
Implementation of the 37 two-story dwelling units would result in long-term regional emissions of
criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors associated with area sources, such as natural gas
consumption, landscaping, applications of architectural coatings, and consumer products. However,
operational vehicular emissions would generate a majority of the emissions generated from the
Project.
Operational emissions associated with the proposed Project were modeled using CalEEMod and
are presented in Table AQ-3. As shown, the proposed Project would result in long-term regional
emissions of the criteria pollutants that would be below the SCAQMD’s applicable thresholds.
Therefore, the Project’s operational emissions would not exceed the NAAQS and CAAQS, would
not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant impacts, and would
be less than significant.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
33
Table AQ-3: Summary of Regional Operational Emissions
Operational Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Area 2.2 0.6 2.4 0.0 0.1 0.1
Energy 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1
Mobile 1.3 1.1 11.6 0.0 0.9 0.2
Total Project Operational
Emissions 3.5 2.4 14.2 0.0 1.0 0.3
SCAQMD Significance
Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A)
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Less Than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD recommends the evaluation of localized NO2, CO,
PM10, and PM2.5 construction-related impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the
Project site. Such an evaluation is referred to as a localized significance threshold (LST) analysis.
The impacts were analyzed pursuant to the SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold
Methodology. SCAQMD has developed LSTs that represent the maximum emissions from a Project
that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable
federal or state ambient air quality standards, and thus would not cause or contribute to localized
air quality impacts. LSTs are developed based on the ambient concentrations of NOx, CO, PM10,
and PM2.5 pollutants for each of the 38 source receptor areas (SRAs) in the SCAB. The Project site
is located in SRA 11, South San Gabriel Valley.
Sensitive receptors can include residential uses such as long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation
centers, and retirement homes. Residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, and athletic
facilities can also be considered sensitive receptors. The nearest LST sensitive receptors to the Project
site are the existing residences that are to the northwest of the site.
Construction
The localized thresholds from the mass rate look-up tables in SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance
Threshold Methodology document, were developed for use on Projects that are less than or equal
to 5-acres in size or have a disturbance of less than or equal to 5 acres daily and were used to
evaluate LSTs. Localized construction emissions associated with the proposed Project were modeled
using CalEEMod and are presented in Table AQ-4. As shown in Table AQ-4, with implementation
of SCAQMD Rules 403 and 1113 (included as PPP AQ-2 and PPP AQ-3), the maximum daily
construction emissions from the proposed Project would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LST
thresholds. The maximum daily emissions assumes that demolition, preparation, grading, building
construction, and paving would overlap and occur at the same time. However, these are separate
stages of work and would not occur simultaneously. Thus, a conservative analysis was utilized for
the maximum daily emissions.
Table AQ-4: Localized Construction Emissions
Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
2022
Demolition 27.3 23.5 1.7 1.2
Site Prep 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
34
Grading 20.0 19.7 2.8 1.8
Building Construction 12.8 14.3 0.6 0.6
Paving 8.5 10.5 0.4 0.4
Maximum Daily Emissions 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3
2023
Paving 8.2 10.5 0.4 0.4
Architectural Coating 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0
Maximum Daily Emissions 8.2 10.5 0.4 0.4
Maximum Daily Emission
2023-2024 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3
SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 121 1,031 7 5
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A)
Operation
Localized Significance Analysis. The proposed Project would operate 37 two-story dwelling units,
which would not involve vehicles idling or queueing for long periods. Therefore, due to the lack of
significant stationary source emissions, impacts related to operational localized significance
thresholds would be less than significant.
CO Hotspots. Areas of vehicle congestion have the potential to create pockets of CO called
hotspots. These pockets have the potential to exceed the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the
eight-hour standard of 9 ppm. Because CO is produced in greatest quantities from vehicle
combustion and does not readily disperse into the atmosphere, adherence to ambient air quality
standards is typically demonstrated through an analysis of localized CO concentrations. Hotspots
are typically produced at intersections, where traffic congestion is highest because vehicles queue
for longer periods and are subject to reduced speeds.
With the turnover of older vehicles and introduction of cleaner fuels, electric vehicles, and vehicles
with stop-start systems (where the engine shuts down when the vehicle is stopped and restarts when
the break petal is released), as well as implementation of control technology on industrial facilities,
CO concentrations in the SCAB and the state have steadily declined.
The analysis of CO hotspots compares the volume of traffic that has the potential to generate a
CO hotspot (exceedance the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9
ppm) and the volume of traffic with implementation of the proposed Project. In 2003, the SCAQMD
estimated that a Project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more
than 44,000 vehicles per hour—or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal air
does not mix—in order to exceed state standards and generate a CO hot spot.
As detailed in Section 17, Transportation (Table TR-1), based on the trip rates from the Institute of
Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021, the proposed Project would generate
26 vehicle trips (7 inbound trips and 19 outbound trips) during the AM peak hour. During the PM
peak hour, the Project would generate 35 new vehicle trips (22 inbound trips and 13 outbound
trips). Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an increase in traffic volumes at a single
intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour—or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical
and/or horizontal air does not mix and would not generate a CO hotspot. Therefore, impacts
related to CO hotspots from operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
35
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial
number of people?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not emit other emissions, such as those
generating objectionable odors, that would affect a substantial number of people. The threshold
for odor is identified by SCAQMD Rule 402, Nuisance, which states:
A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air
contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance
to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the
comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause,
or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The
provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations
necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals.
The type of facilities that are considered to result in other emissions, such as objectionable odors,
include wastewater treatments plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations,
fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms,
petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical manufacturing, and food manufacturing
facilities.
The proposed Project would implement residential development within the Project area that does
not involve the types of uses that would emit objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people. In addition, odors generated by non-residential land uses are required to be in compliance
with SCAQMD Rule 402, which would prevent nuisance odors.
During construction, emissions from construction equipment, architectural coatings, and paving
activities may generate odors. However, these odors would be temporary, intermittent in nature,
and would not affect a substantial number of people. The noxious odors would be confined to the
immediate vicinity of the construction equipment. Also, the short-term construction-related odors
would cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor-producing materials. Therefore, impacts
associated with other emissions, such as odors, would not adversely affect a substantial number of
people.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is required
to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 402.
The Project shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or
other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number
of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such
persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to
business or property.
PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is required
to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403,
which includes the following:
• All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed
25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
36
• The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the
Project are watered, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily
during dry weather; preferably in the mid-morning, afternoon, and after work is done for
the day.
• The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are
reduced to 15 miles per hour or less.
PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. The construction plans and specifications shall state that the Project is
required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule
(SCAQMD) Rule 1113. Only “Low-Volatile Organic Compounds” paints (no more than 50 gram/liter
of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications shall be used.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to air quality are required.
Sources
Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis. Prepared by EPD Solutions (EPD,
2022) (Appendix A).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
37
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
Would the Project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
The discussion below is based on the General Biological Assessment, prepared by Hernandez
Environmental Services, which is included as Appendix B.
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service?
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is vacant and contains a portion
of a paved driveway, disturbed dirt trails, and gravel. The perimeters of the site are bound by
chain-link fencing, masonry block walls, and plastic fencing. There are palm trees present along the
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
38
northwest property boundary. The Project site is surrounded by urban developed areas with
structures, paved parking, and ornamental landscaping.
Sensitive Plant Species
The Project site consists of ruderal habitat dominated by non-native plant species. A total of 45
sensitive species of plants have the potential to occur on or within the vicinity of the Project site. A
total of 13 plant species are listed as state or federally Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate
species. A field survey was conducted by Hernandez Environmental Services on June 27, 2022.
Linear transects approximately 50 feet apart were walked for 100 percent coverage. All species
observed were recorded and Global Positioning System (GPS) way points were taken to delineate
specific habitat types and species locations. Table BIO-1 shows survey results for listed and
potential plant species and demonstrates that no sensitive plant species are present on the Project
site.
Table Bio-1: Potentially Occurring Plant Species
Plant Species Presence
Braunton’s Milk-vetch Not Present
Parish’s Brittlescale Not Present
Nevin’s Barberry Not Present
Lucky Morning-glory Not Present
Southern Tarplant Not Present
Smoorth Tarplant Not Present
Parry’s Spineflower Not Present
Slender-horned Spineflower Not Present
San Gabriel Mountains Dudleya Not Present
Mesa Horkelia Not Present
Coulter’s Goldfields Not Present
California Orcutt Grass Not Present
Brand’s Star Phacelia Not Present
Source: Hernandez, 2022 (Appendix B)
Sensitive Animal Species
As discussed above, a field survey was conducted by Hernandez Environmental Services on June
27, 2022, linear transects approximately 50 feet apart were walked for 100 percent coverage.
All species observed were recorded and Global Positioning System (GPS) way points were taken
to delineate specific habitat types and species locations. Based on the California Natural Diversity
Database (CNDDB), a total of 45 sensitive species of animals have the potential to occur on or
within the vicinity of the Project site. A total of 10 wildlife species are listed as state and/or
federally Threatened, Endangered, Rare or Candidate Species. Table BIO-2 below shows survey
results for listed and potential plant species and demonstrates that no sensitive animal species are
present on the Project site, with the exception of the Bell’s Sage Sparrow that has the potential to
be present.
Table Bio-2: Potentially Occurring Animal Species
Plant Species Presence
Arroyo Toad Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Swainson’s Hawk Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
39
Bell’s Sage Sparrow Not currently
present, has
potential to be
present in future
Santa Ana Sucker Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Coastal California gnatcatcher Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Southern Mountain Yellow-Legged
Frog
Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Bank Swallow Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Least Bell’s Vireo Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Coulter’s Goldfields Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
California Orcutt Grass Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Brand’s Star Phacelia Not currently
present, no potential
for presence
Source: Hernandez, 2022 (Appendix B)
As determined by the field survey and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare Plant
Inventory, no endangered, rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats)
or wildlife species designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or California Native Plant Society (CNPS) currently occur
on the site. However, The Bell’s Sage Sparrow has potential to occur onsite. Therefore, Mitigation
Measure (MM) BIO-1 is included to require vegetation removal and other disturbance activities to
be conducted outside of nesting bird season and would require a pre-construction nesting bird
survey if construction activities are required during nesting bird season. Potential impacts to the
Bell’s Sage Sparrow would be less than significant with mitigation. As no sensitive species or habitat
occur onsite and the Project would comply with MM BIO-1, implementation of the Project would not
result in an adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any sensitive species,
and impacts would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact. Riparian habitats occur along the banks of rivers, streams, or wetland areas. Sensitive
natural communities are natural communities that are considered rare in the region by regulatory
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
40
agencies or are known to provide habitat for sensitive animal or plant species. As described in the
previous response, the Project site is within an urban area, developed, and does not contain any
natural habitats, including riparian habitat or sensitive natural community. Additionally, the Project
site is bound by developed areas that include buildings, pavement, roadways, and small areas of
open space that do not contain sensitive natural habitat areas. Thus, no impacts related to riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans would result from
Project implementation.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including but
not limited to, marsh, vernal, pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
No Impact. Wetlands are defined under the federal Clean Water Act as land that is flooded or
saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and
that normally does support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted to life in saturated soils. Wetlands
include areas such as swamps, marshes, and bogs. The Project site and adjacent areas are located
within a developed urban area and do not contain wetlands. Therefore, the Project would not result
in impacts to wetlands.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Wildlife corridors are areas where wildlife
movement is concentrated due to natural or anthropogenic constraints and corridors provide access
to resources such as food, water, and shelter. Animals use these corridors to move between different
habitats and provide avenues for wildlife dispersal, migration, and contact between other
populations. The Project site does not support conditions of migratory wildlife corridors or linkages.
The Project site is surrounded by a roadway and developed land uses. The site and surrounding
areas do not provide function for wildlife movement. Additionally, the surrounding area is
developed and urban. There are no rivers, creeks, or open drainages near the site that could
function as a wildlife corridor. Thus, implementation of the Project would not result in impacts related
to wildlife movement or wildlife corridors.
However, the Project site contains existing ornamental trees that could be used for nesting by bird
species that are protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the California Fish
and Game Code Sections 3503.5, 3511, and 3515 during the avian nesting and breeding season
that occurs between February 1 and September 15. The provisions of the MBTA prohibits disturbing
or destroying active nests. Therefore, MM BIO-1 has been included to require that if commencement
of vegetation clearing occurs between February 1 and September 15, a qualified biologist shall
conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 3 days prior to commencement of activities to confirm
the absence of nesting birds. With implementation of MM BIO-1, potential impacts to nesting birds
would be less than significant.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. There are no local biological related policies or ordinances, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance that is applicable to the Project. Oak trees in the City are protected under the
City’s Municipal Code Chapter 17.104 which creates conditions for the preservation and
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
41
propagation of oak trees within the City. The Project does not contain any oak trees and would
install new trees throughout the Project site. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not
conflict with local polices or ordinances protecting trees and no impact would occur.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact. The Project site is disturbed and in an urban area. The Project site does not contain any
natural lands that are subject to an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore,
the Project would not result in impacts to biological habitat plans.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Prior to commencement of grading activities,
the City Building Department, shall verify that in the event that vegetation and tree removal
activities occur within the active breeding season for birds (February 1–September 15), the Project
applicant (or their Construction Contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist (meaning a professional
biologist that is familiar with local birds and their nesting behaviors) to conduct a nesting bird survey
no more than 3 days prior to commencement of construction activities.
The nesting survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that
could potentially be affected by Project-related construction activities, such as noise, human activity,
and dust, etc. If active nesting of birds is observed within 100 feet of the designated construction
area prior to construction, the qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate buffer around the
active nests (e.g., as much as 500 feet for raptors and 300 feet for non-raptors [subject to the
recommendations of the qualified biologist]), and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests
are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests.
Sources
City of Rosemead, Municipal Code, Chapters 17.104, Street Trees. Available at:
https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT17
ZO_ART4SUST_CH17.104OATRPR
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Available at:
https://www.fws.gov/law/migratory-bird-treaty-act-1918
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
42
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the
Project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
in § 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
The discussion below is based on the Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (Appendix C).
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined
in §15064.5?
Less Than Significant Impact. According to the State CEQA Guidelines, a historical resource is
defined as something that meets one or more of the following criteria:
(1) listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources
(CRHR);
(2) listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC)
Section 5020.1(k);
(3) identified as significant in a historical resources survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section
5024.1(g); or
(4) determined to be a historical resource by the Project’s Lead Agency.
According to the PRC, a resource is considered historically significant if it meets at least one of the
following criteria:
1) Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States;
2) Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history;
3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction
or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or
4) Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history
of the local area, California or the nation.
The Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the Project site indicated that a church was
constructed on the Project site between 1953 and 1964 but was demolished in 1992. The structure
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
43
was not listed in the CRHR files. The records search and literature review concluded that there is a
low potential for prehistoric sites to be contained within the boundaries of the Project site due to
the extensive nature of past ground disturbances. In addition, there is a SCE Mesa-Ravendale-Rush
66kV transmission line located within the Project site that was identified as a cultural resource at
the SCCIC. However, according to the site record form, the transmission line was evaluated and did
not appear to be eligible under National Register/California Register Criterion A/4. In addition,
the transmission line is not situated within the Project site and is located above a portion of the site.
The 11-mile span of low-voltage electrical transmission lines were not installed or constructed to
include any innovative or unique features or materials that could be considered important to local,
state, or national history. The records searches did not identify any events on the Project site or
persons in relation to the Project site, that would meet the California Register criteria of a historic
resource. Therefore, the transmission line does not meet the CEQA criteria for a historic resource
and impacts would be less than significant.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As previously described, the Cultural
Resources Assessment identified one historic-aged cultural resource onsite. However, the Cultural
Resources Assessment concluded that the Transmission Line did not appear to be eligible under
National Register/California Register Criterion A/4. The Cultural Resources Assessment (including
field survey) prepared for the Project did not identify any archaeological resources within the
Project site. However, as discussed in the Cultural Resources Assessment, there is a potential for
previously unknown archaeological resources to be below the soil surface. Therefore, MM CUL-1
would require monitoring during ground-disturbing activities such as grading or trenching. In
addition, MM TCR-1 would require Native American monitoring to ensure cultural resource impacts
would remain less than significant with mitigation. With implementation of MM CUL-1 and MM TCR-
1, potential impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant.
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site has been previously disturbed, as described above,
and has not been previously used as a cemetery. It is not anticipated that implementation of the
proposed Project would result in the disturbance of human remains. Existing regulation under the
California Health and Safety Code, included as PPP CUL-1, outlines the procedures to undertake if
human remains are found on the Project site. Compliance with existing regulations would ensure
impacts related to potential disturbance of human remains would be less than significant.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Should human remains be discovered during Project construction, the
Project will be required to comply with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which states
that no further disturbance may occur in the vicinity of the body until the County Coroner has made
a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The
County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be
prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will determine
the identity of and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or
his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must
complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
44
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. The Applicant shall retain a qualified
archaeologist to perform archaeological monitoring and the archaeologist shall be present during
initial ground-disturbing activities (e.g., site preparation and grading) to identify and assess any
known or suspected archaeological and/or cultural resource. The qualified archaeologist shall
develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan to address the details, timing, and responsibility
of all archaeological and cultural resource activities that occur on the Project site. The plan shall
include a scope of work, project grading and development scheduling, pre-construction meeting
(with consultants, contractors, and monitors), a monitoring schedule during all initial ground-
disturbance related activities, safety requirements, and protocols to follow in the event of previously
unknown cultural resources discoveries that could be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The
plan shall be submitted to the City and the Consulting Tribe(s) for review and comment, prior to
final approval by the City.
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. Prior to the commencement of any
ground disturbing activity at the Project site, the Project applicant shall retain a Native American
Monitor approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. A copy of the executed
contract shall be submitted to the City of Rosemead Planning and Building Department prior to the
issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The Tribal monitor shall
only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing
activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but
are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring,
grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project area. The Tribal Monitor shall
complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including
construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring
shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project site are completed, or when the Tribal
Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing activities at
the Project site have little to no potential to impact Tribal Cultural Resources.
Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate
vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. All Tribal
Cultural Resources unearthed by Project activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist
and Tribal monitor approved by the Consulting Tribe. If the resources are Native American in
origin, the Consulting Tribe shall retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems
appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If human remains and/or grave
goods are discovered or recognized at the Project site, all ground disturbance shall immediately
cease, and the county coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and
Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated
alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Work may continue on
other parts of the Project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a non-Native American resource is determined by the qualified
archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time
allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate
mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in
accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections
21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the
preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include
implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with
subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
45
Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest
in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum,
if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological
material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational
purposes.
Sources
California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1
Brian Smith and Associates. Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project. March
2022. (Appendix C)
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(a).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
46
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
6. ENERGY. Would the Project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during Project construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
The discussion below is based on the Air Quality, and Energy Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis,
prepared by EPD Solutions. Inc., which is included as Appendix A.
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during Project construction or operation?
Less Than Significant Impact.
Construction
During construction of the proposed Project, energy would be consumed in three general forms:
1. Petroleum-based fuels used to power off-road construction vehicles and equipment on the
Project sites, construction worker travel to and from the Project sites, as well as delivery
truck trips;
2. Electricity associated with providing temporary power for lighting and electric equipment;
and
3. Energy used in the production of construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete,
pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass.
Construction activities related to the proposed building and the associated infrastructure would not
be expected to result in demand for fuel greater on a per-unit-of-development basis than other
development Projects in southern California. Construction does not involve any unusual or increased
need for energy. In addition, the extent of construction activities that would occur are limited to an
approximate 11-month period, and the demand for construction-related electricity and fuels would
be limited to that time frame.
Construction contractors are required to demonstrate compliance with applicable California Air
Resources Board (CARB) regulations governing the accelerated retrofitting, repowering, or
replacement of heavy-duty diesel on- and off-road equipment as part of the City’s construction
permitting process. In addition, compliance with existing CARB idling restrictions, which is included
as PPP E-1, would reduce fuel combustion and energy consumption. The Project construction fuel
usage over the estimated 11-month construction period would result in the need for 10,233 gallons
of diesel fuel, which is summarized in Table E-1.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
47
Table E-1: Estimated Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption
Activity Equipment Number
Hours
per
day
Horse-
power
Days of
Construction
Total
Horsepower-
hours
Fuel Rate
(gal/hp-hr)
Fuel Use
(gallons)
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 367 2 4,698 0.020615155 97
Concrete/Industrial
Saws
1 8 33 2 385 0.041912413 16
Excavators 3 8 36 2 657 0.019868435 13
Site
Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 367 5 17,616 0.020615155 363
Tractors/Loaders/Bac
khoes
4 8 84 5 4,973 0.019155948 95
Grading
Graders 1 8 148 8 3,884 0.021167864 82
Excavators 1 8 36 8 876 0.019868435 17
Tractors/Loaders/Bac
khoes
3 8 84 8 5,967 0.019155948 114
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 367 8 9,395 0.020615155 194
Model
Building
Construction
Cranes 1 8 367 230 195,831 0.014896922 2,917
Forklifts 3 8 82 230 90,528 0.010444038 945
Generator Sets 1 8 14 230 19,062 0.042356362 807
Tractors/Loaders/Bac
khoes
1 8 84 230 57,187 0.019155948 1,095
Welder 3 8 46 230 114,264 0.025848623 2,954
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Bac
khoes
1 8 84 18 4,476 0.019155948 86
Cement and Mortar
Mixers
2 8 10 18 1,613 0.019767572 32
Pavers 1 8 81 18 4,899 0.021536901 106
Paving Equipment 2 8 89 18 9,228 0.01846541 170
Rollers 2 8 36 18 3,940 0.019837453 78
Architectural
Coating
Air Compressors 1 8 78 18 5,391 0.027606329 149
Total 10,233
Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A)
Table E-2 shows that construction related vehicle usage would use approximately 1,246 gallons of
diesel fuel and 3,095 gallons of gasoline to travel to and from the Project site. Tables E-3 shows
that a total of approximately 11,479 gallons of diesel fuel and 3,095 gallons of gasoline would
be used for construction of the proposed Project.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
48
Table E-2: Estimated Construction Vehicle Fuel Consumption
Construction
Source Number VMT Fuel Rate Gallons of Diesel
Fuel
Gallons of
Gasoline Fuel
Haul Trucks 56 1,120 5.96 188 0
Vendor Trucks 4 9,384 8.87 1,058 0
Worker Vehicles 72 80,179 25.91 0 3,095
Total 1,246 3,095
Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A)
Table E-3: Estimated Total Construction Fuel Usage
Construction Source Gallons of Diesel Fuel Gallons of Gasoline Fuel
Construction Vehicles 1,246 3,095
Off-road Construction
Equipment 10,233 0
Total 11,479 3,095
Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A)
In addition, construction contractors are required to demonstrate compliance with applicable
California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulations governing the accelerated retrofitting,
repowering, or replacement of heavy-duty diesel on- and off-road equipment. Also, compliance
with existing CARB idling restrictions and the use of newer engines and equipment would reduce
fuel combustion and energy consumption. Overall, construction activities would require limited
energy consumption, would comply with all existing regulations, and would therefore not be
expected to use large amounts of energy or fuel in a wasteful manner. Thus, impacts related to
construction energy usage would be less than significant.
Operation
Once operational, the Project would generate demand for electricity, natural gas, as well as
gasoline for motor vehicle trips. Operational use of energy includes the heating, cooling, and
lighting of the residences, water heating, operation of electrical systems and plug-in appliances,
parking lot and outdoor lighting, and the transport of electricity, natural gas, and water to the
areas where they would be consumed. This use of energy is typical for urban development, and no
operational activities or land uses would occur that would result in extraordinary energy
consumption. As detailed in Table E-4, operation of the proposed Project would use approximately
252,539 kilowatt-hour (kWh) per year of electricity, approximately 1,242,170 thousand British
thermal units (kBTU) per year of natural gas, and 45,533 gallons of gasoline annually.
Table E-4: Estimated Annual Operational Energy Consumption
Operational Source Energy Usage
Electricity (Kilowatt-Hours)
Project 252,539
Natural Gas (Thousands British Thermal Units)
Project 1,242,170
Petroleum (gasoline) Consumption
Annual VMT Gallons of Gasoline Fuel
Project 1,127,736 43,533
Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
49
Consistent with the 2019 CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24 Part 6), the Project
would include photovoltaic (PV) solar panels on the rooftops of each of the residences. The State
of California provides a minimum standard for building design and construction standards through
Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR). Compliance with Title 24 is mandatory at the
time new building permits are issued by the City that the Project shall comply with the adopted
California Energy Code (Code of Regulations, Title 24 Part 6). The City’s administration of the Title
24 requirements includes review of design components and energy conservation measures that
occurs during the permitting process, and is included as PPP E-1, which ensures that all requirements
are met. Typical Title 24 measures include insulation; use of energy-efficient heating, ventilation,
and air conditioning equipment (HVAC); energy-efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems;
reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water; and
incorporation of skylights, etc. In complying with the Title 24 standards, impacts to peak energy
usage periods would be minimized, and impacts on statewide and regional energy needs would
be reduced. The California Energy Commission estimates that single-family homes built in
compliance with the 2019 energy efficiency standards uses about 7 percent less energy due to
energy-efficiency measures versus those built under the 2016 code. With use of rooftop solar
electricity generation, homes built under the 2019 code use about 53 percent less energy than
those under the 2016 standards (2019 Fact Sheet). In addition, the Project would be built to comply
with the 2019 energy efficiency standards as discussed in PPP E-1. Thus, operation of the Project
would not use large amounts of energy or fuel in a wasteful manner, and less than significant
operational energy impacts would occur.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
No Impact. The proposed Project would be required to meet the California Energy Code efficiency
standards in effect during permitting of the Project, as included as PPP E-1. The City’s administration
of the requirements includes review of design components and energy conservation measures during
the permitting process, which ensures that all requirements are met. In addition, the Project would
not conflict with or obstruct opportunities to use renewable energy, such as solar energy. As
discussed, the Project proposes to use photovoltaic (PV) solar panels on each of the residences to
offset their energy demand in accordance with the existing Title 24 requirements (included as PPP
E-1). As such, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable
energy or energy efficiency, and impacts would not occur.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP E-1: California Energy Code Compliance. The Project is required to comply with the 2019
California Energy Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 12.24) to ensure efficient
use of energy. California Energy Code specifications are required to be incorporated into building
plans as a condition of building permit approval.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to energy are required.
Sources
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Analysis, Prepared by EPD Solutions (EPD, 2022)
(Appendix A).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
50
2019 Residential Energy Code Fact Sheet (2019 Fact Sheet). Accessed:
https://energycodeace.com/content/resources-ace/file_type=fact-sheet
2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Accessed:
https://energycodeace.com/site/custom/public/reference-ace-
2019/index.html#!Documents/section1500mandatoryfeaturesanddevices.htm#mairdistributionan
dventilationsystemductsplenumsandfans.htm
City of Rosemead Municipal Code. Accessed:
https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT15
BUCO_CH15.24ENCO
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
51
The discussion below is based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by Albus &
Associates, Inc., 2021 (GEO 2021) (Appendix D), the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,
prepared by Stantec (Phase 1 2021) (Appendix F), and the Paleontological Assessment prepared
by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (PALEO 2022) (Appendix E).
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the
Project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42?
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss
of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the Project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
52
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is not located within a designated Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zone and no faults were identified on the site (GEO 2021). The closet known
active fault is the Elysian Park (Upper) fault located approximately 1.74 miles from the Project site.
Therefore, the potential for ground rupture due to an earthquake beneath the site is considered
low and any impact would be less than significant.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within a seismically active region of
Southern California. As mentioned previously, the Elysian Park (Upper) fault is located
approximately 1.74 miles from the site. The amount of motion expected at the Project site can vary
from none to forceful depending upon the distance to the fault and the magnitude of the
earthquake. Greater movement can be expected at sites located closer to an earthquake epicenter,
that consists of poorly consolidated material such as alluvium, and in response to an earthquake of
great magnitude. However, the Project site is not located near an earthquake epicenter. Thus,
greater movement would not be expected.
Structures built in the City of Rosemead are required to be built in compliance with the California
Building Code (CBC), which regulates all building and construction Projects within the City and
implements a minimum standard for building design and construction that includes specific
requirements for seismic safety, excavation, foundations, retaining walls, and site demolition.
Compliance with the CBC would include the incorporation of: 1) seismic safety features to minimize
the potential for significant effects as a result of earthquakes; 2) proper building footings and
foundations; and 3) construction of the building structures so that it would withstand the effects of
strong ground shaking. Implementation of CBC standards would be verified by the City during the
plan check and permitting process. Because the proposed Project would be constructed in
compliance with the CBC, the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact related
to strong seismic ground shaking.
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
Less than Significant Impact. Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated, cohesionless
soils layers, located within approximately 50 feet of the ground surface, lose strength due to cyclic
pore water pressure generation from seismic shaking or other large cyclic loading. During the loss
of stress, the soil acquires “mobility” sufficient to permit both horizontal and vertical movements.
Soil properties and soil conditions such as type, age, texture, color, and consistency, along with
historical depths to ground water are used to identify, characterize, and correlate liquefaction
susceptible soils.
According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, the Project site is not located within a State-
designated zone of potentially liquefiable soils (GEO 2021). Additionally, groundwater was not
encountered to the maximum depth of 51.5 feet drilled during exploration. Furthermore,
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
53
groundwater well measurements conducted by the Los Angeles County in the vicinity of the Project
site since 1949 indicate that groundwater has been deeper than 50 feet for more than 70 years.
Therefore, historical high groundwater is anticipated to be deeper than 50 feet below the ground
surface. As a result, the potential for liquefaction to occur beneath the site is considered very low
(GEO 2021). In addition, the proposed Project would be required to be constructed in compliance
with the CBC and the City’s Municipal Code, included as PPP GEO-1, which would be verified
through the City’s plan check and permitting process. With compliance with existing regulations,
impacts related to seismically related ground failure and liquefaction would be less than significant.
iv. Landslides?
No Impact. Landslides and other slope failures are secondary seismic effects that occur during or
soon after earthquakes. Areas that are most susceptible to earthquakes induced landslides are
steep slopes underlain by loose, weak soils, and areas on or adjacent to existing landslide deposits.
The site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from approximately 357 to 363 feet above mean
sea level (GEO 2021) and is surrounded by level areas that do not include hills or other changes
in topography that may result in landslides. As described above, the Project site is located in a
seismically active region subject to strong ground shaking. However, the Geotechnical Investigation
states that the site is not within an area identified to have a potential for landsliding (GEO 2021).
Therefore, the Project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects related to seismically
induced landslides.
b) Result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed Project has the potential to contribute
to soil erosion and the loss of topsoil. Excavations and grading activities that would be required for
the Project would expose and loosen topsoil, which could be eroded by wind or water.
The City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16, Storm Water Management, implements the requirements
of the Los Angeles County Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175, as amended,
(MS4 Permit) establishes minimum stormwater management requirements and controls that are
required to be implemented for construction activities for the Project.
To reduce the potential for soil erosion and the loss of topsoil, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) is required by these City and RWQCB regulations to be developed by a QSD
(Qualified SWPPP Developer), which would be implemented by PPP WQ-1. The SWPPP is required
to address site-specific conditions related to specific grading and construction activities that could
cause erosion and the loss of topsoil and provide erosion control best management practices (BMPs)
to reduce or eliminate the erosion and loss of topsoil. Erosion control BMPs include use of silt fencing,
fiber rolls, or gravel bags, stabilized construction entrance/exit, hydroseeding, etc. With
compliance with the City’s Municipal Code stormwater management requirements, RWQCB SWPPP
requirements, and installation of BMPs, which would be implemented by the City’s Project review
by the Department of Public Works, construction impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil would
be less than significant.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or offsite landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
54
Less than Significant Impact. Landslides and other forms of mass wasting, including mud flows,
debris flows, and soil slips, occur as soil moves downslope under the influence of gravity. Landslides
are frequently triggered by intense rainfall or seismic shaking. As described in Response a) iv., the
Project site is located in a relatively flat developed urban area that does not contain or adjacent
to large slopes, and the Project would not generate large slopes. Therefore, impacts related to
landslides would not occur.
Lateral spreading is a type of liquefaction‐induced ground failure associated with the lateral
displacement of surficial blocks of sediment resulting from liquefaction in a subsurface layer. Once
liquefaction transforms the subsurface layer into a fluid mass, gravity plus the earthquake inertial
forces may cause the mass to move downslope towards a free face (such as a river channel or an
embankment). Lateral spreading may cause large horizontal displacements and such movement
typically damages pipelines, utilities, bridges, and structures. According to the Geotechnical
Investigation, the Project site is not within a liquefaction zone, and high groundwater is not located
at the Project site. Therefore, the site has a low potential for lateral spreading. In addition, site soils
settlement would be reduced with implementation of the excavation and recompaction of the upper
two feet of onsite soils as proposed by the Project and compliance with the CBC. Thus, impacts
related to lateral spreading would be less than significant.
Subsidence is a general lowering of the ground surface over a large area that is generally
attributed to lowering of the ground water levels within a groundwater basin. Localized or focal
subsidence or settlement of the ground can occur as a result of an earthquake motion in an area
where groundwater in basin is lowered. As described previously, groundwater was not encountered
to the maximum depth of 51.5 feet drilled during site exploration (GEO 2021). In addition, the
Project would not involve groundwater pumping from the Project area. Thus, impacts related to
subsidence would not occur from implementation of the Project.
Also, as described in Response a) iii., the Project site is not within a potential liquefaction area as
groundwater is not located within 50 feet of the ground surface. Construction would include removal
and re-compaction of onsite soils in compliance with the CBC which would also reduce any potential
of liquefaction, settlement, and subsidence. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. As
described previously, the Project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC
and the City’s Municipal Code, which would be verified through the City’s plan check and permitting
process. Thus, potential impacts related to liquefaction, settlement, and subsidence would be less
than significant.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
Less than Significant Impact. Expansive soils contain certain types of clay minerals that shrink or
swell as the moisture content changes; the shrinking or swelling can shift, crack, or break structures
built on such soils. Arid or semiarid areas with seasonal changes of soil moisture experience, such as
southern California, have a higher potential of expansive soils than areas with higher rainfall and
more constant soil moisture.
The Geotechnical Investigation determined that the site soils are anticipated to have a “very low”
expansion potential based on soils testing (GEO 2021). In addition, as described in the previous
responses, the Project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the
City’s Municipal Code, that requires appropriate backfill, compaction of soils, and foundation
design to ensure stable soils, which would be verified through the City’s plan check and permitting
process. Thus, impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
55
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
No Impact. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems are proposed. The Project
would install onsite sewers that would connect to the existing infrastructure that is adjacent to the
site. Therefore, no impacts related to the use of such facilities would occur from implementation of
the Project.
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Paleontological resources, or fossils, are the
remains of ancient plants and animals that can provide scientifically significant information about
the history of life on Earth. Paleontological “sensitivity” is defined as the potential for a geologic
unit to produce scientifically significant fossils. This sensitivity is determined by rock type, past history
of the rock unit in producing significant fossils, and fossil localities that are recorded from that unit.
Paleontological sensitivity is assigned based on fossil data collected from the entire geologic unit,
not just a specific site.
The Paleontological Assessment confirmed that Holocene young alluvial fan and valley deposits are
mapped at the surface of the site. Based on the lack of known significant fossil localities nearby
and a low sensitivity rating assigned to Holocene-aged young alluvial deposits for yielding
paleontological resources, it is recommended that paleontological monitoring not be implemented
during mass grading and excavation activities, since impacts to potential paleontological resources
are considered to be less than significant. Although monitoring for paleontological resources is not
required for the Project, should paleontological resources be discovered at any time during earth
disturbance activities, pursuant to MM PAL-1, a paleontologist shall be contacted to assess the find
(PALEO 2021). Implementation of MM PAL-1 would reduce impacts to paleontological resources to
less than significant.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP GEO-1: California Building Code. The Project is required to comply with the California Building
Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 15.04 to preclude significant adverse effects
associated with seismic hazards. California Building Code related and geologist and/or civil
engineer specifications for the Project are required to be incorporated into grading plans and
specifications as a condition of Project approval.
PPP WQ-1: SWPPP. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project developer shall have a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a QSD (Qualified SWPPP Developer) in
accordance with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16 Stormwater Management and Discharge
Control and the Los Angeles County RWQCB NPDES Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012-
0175. The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other
NPDES regulations to limit the potential of erosion and polluted runoff during construction activities.
Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic
inspection of the construction site by City of Rosemead staff or its designee to confirm compliance.
Mitigation Measures
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
56
Mitigation Measure PAL-1: Incidental Discoveries. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the City
of Rosemead Planning Department shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans and
specifications state that in the event that potential paleontological resources are discovered during
excavation, grading, or construction activities, work shall cease within 50 feet of the find until a
qualified paleontologist (i.e., a practicing paleontologist that is recognized in the paleontological
community and is proficient in vertebrate paleontology) from the City or County List of Qualified
Paleontologists has evaluated the find and established a protocol for addressing the find, in
accordance with federal and state regulations. Construction personnel shall not collect or move any
paleontological materials and associated materials. If any fossil remains are discovered, the
paleontologist shall make a recommendation if monitoring shall be required for the continuance of
earth moving activities, and shall provide such monitoring if required.
Sources
Paleontological Assessment, prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., 2022 (PALEO 2022)
(Appendix E).
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Stantec (Phase 1 2021) (Appendix F).
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc., 2020 (GEO 2021)
(Appendix D).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
57
The discussion below is based on the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis,
prepared by EPD Solutions. Inc., which is included as Appendix A.
Explanation
Constituent gases of the Earth’s atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a
critical role in the Earth’s radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation from the Earth’s surface,
which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this
process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (O3), water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O),
and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible
for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of
these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the
enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth’s
natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global
warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture,
utilities, transportation, and residential land uses.
Section 15364.5 of the California Code of Regulations defines GHGs to include carbon dioxide,
methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride.
Transportation is responsible for 37 percent of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions, followed by
electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and N2O are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane,
a potent greenhouse gas, results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and
landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation
and dissolution into the ocean.
California has passed several bills and the Governor has signed at least three executive orders
regarding greenhouse gases. GHG statues and executive orders (EO) include AB 32, SB 1368, EO
S-03-05, EO S-20-06 and EO S-01-07. These regulations require the use of alternative energy,
such as solar power. Solar Projects produce electricity with no GHG emissions and assist in offsetting
GHG emissions produced by fossil-fuel-fired power plants.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.
Would the Project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
58
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
Less than Significant Impact. Global climate change (GCC) describes alterations in weather
features (e.g., temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms) that occur across the Earth as
a whole. GCC is not confined to a particular Project area and is generally accepted as the
consequence of global industrialization over the last 200 years. A typical Project, even a very large
one, does not generate enough GHG emissions on its own to influence global climate change
significantly; hence, the issue of global climate change is, by definition, a cumulative environmental
impact.
The principal GHGs of concern contributing to the greenhouse effect are CO2, CH4, N2O,
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. GHGs are produced by both direct
and indirect emissions sources. Direct emissions include consumption of natural gas, heating and
cooling of buildings, landscaping activities and other equipment used directly by land uses. Indirect
emissions include the consumption of fossil fuels for vehicle trips, electricity generation, water usage,
and solid waste disposal. The large majority of GHG emissions generated from residential Projects
are related to vehicle trips.
The City has not established local CEQA significance thresholds for GHG emissions; however, the
SCAQMD has proposed interim numeric GHG significance thresholds that are based on capture of
approximately 90 percent of emissions from development, which is 3,000 metric tons carbon
dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year (SCAQMD 2008). Construction emissions are amortized
over a period of 30 years, added to the operational emissions, and compared to the applicable
threshold. This approach is widely used by cities in the South Coast Air Basin, including the City of
Rosemead. As such, this threshold is utilized herein to determine if GHG emissions from this Project
would be significant.
Construction
During construction, temporary sources of GHG emissions include construction equipment and
workers’ commutes to and from the site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHGs such as
CO2, CH4, and N2O. Construction GHG emissions associated with the proposed Project were
modeled using CalEEMod and are presented in Table GHG-1. As shown on Table GHG-1, the
Project has the potential to generate a total of approximately 12 MTCO2e per year from
construction emissions amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD methodology.
Table GHG-1: Project Construction Emissions
Activity
Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e)
2023 369
2024 2
Total Emissions 371
Total Emissions Amortized
Over 30 Years 12
Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A)
Operation
During operations, the proposed residences would generate long-term GHG emissions from
vehicular trips; water, natural gas, and electricity consumption; and solid waste generation. Natural
gas use results in the emission of two GHGs: CH4 (the major component of natural gas) and CO2
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
59
(from the combustion of natural gas). Electricity use can result in GHG production if the electricity is
generated by combusting fossil fuel.
Operational GHG emissions associated with the 37 residential units were modeled using CalEEMod
and are presented in Table GHG-2. The large majority of GHG emissions generated from the
residences would be from vehicle trips. As shown in Table GHG-2, the Project would generate
approximately 601 MTCO2e per year, which is less than the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000
MTCO2e. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Table GHG-2: Project Total GHG Emissions
Activity
Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e)
Project Operational Emissions
Mobile 412
Area 10
Energy 172
Water 4
Waste 3
Total Project Gross
Operation Emissions
601
Project Construction
Emissions 12
Total Emissions 613
Significance Threshold 3,000
Threshold Exceeded? No
Source: EPD, 2022 (Appendix A)
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. As described in
the previous response, the Project would not exceed thresholds related to GHG emissions. In
addition, the Project would comply with regulations imposed by the state and the SCAQMD that
reduce GHG emissions, as described below:
• Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) is applicable to the Project because many
of the GHG reduction measures outlined in AB 32 (e.g., low carbon fuel standard, advanced
clean car standards, and cap-and-trade) have been adopted over the last 5 years and
implementation activities are ongoing. The proposed Project would not conflict with fuel and
car standards or cap-and-trade.
• Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards (AB 1493) establishes fuel efficiency ratings for new
(model year 2009-2016) passenger cars and light trucks. The Project would develop new
residential units that would not conflict with fuel efficiency standards for vehicles.
• Title 24 California Code of Regulations (Title 24) establishes energy efficiency requirements
for new construction that address the energy efficiency of new (and altered) buildings. The
Project is required to comply with Title 24, which would be verified by the City during the
plan check and permitting process.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
60
• Title 17 California Code of Regulations (Low Carbon Fuel Standard [LCFS]) requires carbon
content of fuel sold in California to be 10 percent less by 2020. Because the LCFS applies
to any transportation fuel that is sold or supplied in California, all vehicle trips generated
by the Project would comply with LCFS.
• California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881) provides
requirements to ensure water efficient landscapes in new development and reduced water
waste in existing landscapes. The Project is required to comply with AB 1881 landscaping
requirements, which would be verified by the City during the plan check and permitting
process.
• Emissions from vehicles, which are a main source of operational GHG emissions, would be
reduced through implementation of federal and state fuel and air quality emissions
requirements that are implemented by CARB. In addition, as described in the previous
response, the Project would not result in an exceedance of an air quality standard.
The City currently does not have an adopted Climate Action Plan to reduce GHG emissions, and as
described in the previous response, emissions would not exceed the thresholds. Therefore,
implementation of the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
See (b) above for applicable regulations.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to greenhouse gas emissions are required.
Sources
South Coast Air Quality Management District Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse
Gas Significance Thresholds (SCAQMD 2008). Accessed:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-
significancethresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf
Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas, Impact Analysis. Prepared by EPD Solutions (EPD,
2022) (Appendix A).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
61
The discussion below is based on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Stantec
(Phase I 2021) (Appendix F) and Remedial Excavation Completion Report, prepared by Stantec
(Excavation 2022) (Appendix G).
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
Less than Significant Impact. A hazardous material is defined as any material that, due to its
quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS. Would the Project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5
and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a Project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the Project result in a
safety hazard or excessive noise for people
residing or working in the Project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly
or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland fires?
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
62
potential hazard to human health and safety or to environment if released into the environment.
Hazardous materials include, but are not limited to, hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, and
any material that regulatory agencies have a reasonable basis for believing would be injuries to
the health and safety of persons or harmful to the environment if released into the home, workplace,
or environment. Hazardous wastes require special handling and disposal because of their potential
to damage public health and the environment.
Construction
The proposed construction activities would involve the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous
materials such as paints, solvents, oils, grease, and caulking. In addition, hazardous materials would
be needed for fueling and servicing construction equipment on the site. These types of materials
are not acutely hazardous, and all storage, handling, use, and disposal of these materials are
regulated by federal and state requirements that are implemented by the City during building
permitting for construction activities. These regulations include: the federal Occupational Safety and
Health Act and Hazardous Materials Transportation Act; Title 8 of the California Code of
Regulations (CalOSHA), and the state Unified Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials
Management Regulatory Program. As a result, routine transport and use of hazardous materials
during construction would be less than significant.
Operation
The Project involves operation of 37 new two-story dwelling units and central common open space,
which involve routinely using hazardous materials including solvents, cleaning agents, paints,
pesticides, batteries, fertilizers, and aerosol cans. These types of materials are not acutely
hazardous and would only be used and stored in limited quantities. The normal routine use of these
hazardous materials products pursuant to existing regulations would not result in a significant
hazard to people or the environment in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, operation of the Project
would not result in a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous waste, and impacts would be less than significant.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
Less than Significant Impact.
Construction
Accidental Releases. While the routine use, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous
materials in accordance with applicable regulations during construction activities would not pose
health risks or result in significant impacts; improper use, storage, transportation and disposal of
hazardous materials and wastes could result in accidental spills or releases, posing health risks to
workers, the public, and the environment. To avoid an impact related to an accidental release, the
use of best management practices (BMPs) during construction would be implemented as part of a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System General Construction Permit (and included as PPP WQ-1). Implementation of
an SWPPP would minimize potential adverse effects to workers, the public, and the environment.
Construction contract specifications would include strict on-site handling rules and BMPs that include,
but are not limited to:
• Establishing a dedicated area for fuel storage and refueling and construction dewatering
activities that includes secondary containment protection measures and spill control supplies;
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
63
• Following manufacturers’ recommendations on the use, storage, and disposal of chemical
products used in construction;
• Avoiding overtopping construction equipment fuel tanks;
• Properly containing and removing grease and oils during routine maintenance of
equipment; and
• Properly disposing of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals.
Historical On-Site Agricultural Use. The Project site was used for agricultural uses from
approximately 1928 through the 1950’s. Application of pesticide and herbicide is considered likely
to have occurred during this time period, potentially resulting in the accumulation of pesticides and
metals common with herbicide application in shallow soils at the site. Therefore, the former
agricultural activity on the site was considered a REC by the Phase I ESA (Phase I 2021).
In response to the potential accumulation of pesticides and herbicides in the soil onsite and the REC
identified in the Phase I ESA, Stantec oversaw the excavation and removal of approximately 300
cubic yards of impacted soil on March 28, 2022. The excavation removed soil that was
contaminated with chlordane to below screening levels to a maximum depth of 5 feet below ground
surface (bgs). Post remediation site-wide chlordane levels were reported below screening levels
(Excavation 2022). As such, no further action with respect to chlordane impacts in soil is warranted
as impacts were reduced to levels that are less than significant. Additionally, the shallow soil
investigation recommended in the Phase I ESA is no longer warranted as contaminated soils have
been removed. Therefore, construction of the Project would not result in a significant hazard to the
environment, residents, or workers in the vicinity of the Project site and impacts would be less than
significant.
Operation
As described previously, operation of the proposed 37 two-story dwelling units and related site
improvements includes use of limited hazardous materials, such as solvents, cleaning agents, paints,
pesticides, batteries, fertilizers, and aerosol cans. Normal routine use of typical residential products
pursuant to existing regulations would not result in a significant hazard to the environment, residents,
or workers in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Less than Significant Impact. There are no existing or proposed schools within one-quarter mile of
the Project site. The closest schools to the site are Emma W. Shuey Elementary School located 0.27
mile to the southwest, Muscatel Middle School located 0.38 mile to the southeast, Rosemead High
School located 0.45 mile to the west, and Gabrielino High School located 0.58 mile southwest. As
described previously, construction and operation of the Project would involve the use, storage, and
disposal of small amounts of hazardous materials on the Project site. These hazardous materials
would be limited and used and disposed of in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations,
which would reduce the potential for accidental release into the environment near a school. The
emissions that would be generated from construction and operation of the Project were evaluated
in the air quality analysis discussed above, and the emissions generated from the Project would not
cause or contribute to an exceedance of the federal or state air quality standards. Thus, the Project
would not emit hazardous or handle acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste near a
school, and impacts would be less than significant.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
64
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. According to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor
database, and the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the site (Phase 1 2021) the
Project site is not located on or nearby any hazardous material sites listed, pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5. As a result, impacts related to hazards from being located on or adjacent
to a hazardous materials site would not occur from implementation of the proposed Project.
e) For a Project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the Project area?
No Impact. The Project site is not within two miles of an airport. The closest airport is the San Gabriel
Valley Airport, which is 2.5 miles east of the Project site. The Project site is not located within any
land use compatibility zone for the nearest airport, nor is it within an airport safety zone (ALUC
2022). Therefore, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the Project areas, and no impacts would occur.
f) Impair implementation of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Less than Significant Impact.
Construction
The proposed construction activities, including equipment and supply staging and storage, would
occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site
or adjacent areas. During construction of the Project driveway, Mission Drive would remain open to
ensure adequate emergency access to the Project area and vicinity. Impacts related to interference
with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan during construction activities would be
less than significant.
Operation
Operation of the proposed Project would not result in a physical interference with an emergency
response evacuation. Direct access to the Project site would be provided from Mission Drive, which
is a 4-lane minor arterial roadway that is adjacent to the Project site. The Project is also required
to design and construct internal access and provide fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants and
sprinklers) in conformance with the City Municipal Code and the Fire Department prior to approval
to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant to the requirements in Section 503 of the California
Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9) and the Fire Code included per
Municipal Code Chapter 8.24). As a result, the proposed Project would not impair implementation
of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan,
and impacts would be less than significant.
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland fires?
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
65
No Impact. According to the California Fire Hazard Severity Zones mapping and Figure 12.5, Fire
Hazard Severity Zones Policy Map, of the Los Angeles County General Plan, the City of Rosemead
(including the Project site) is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is
located within an urbanized area and development of the site with residential uses would not result
in impacts related to the exposure of people or structures to loss, injury, or death involving wildland
fires.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to hazards and hazardous
materials that are applicable to the Project.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to hazards and hazardous materials are required.
Sources
Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor Database (Envirostor): Available:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/
LA County’s Airport Land Use Commission Site: Available:
https://lacounty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=acf2e87194a54af9b266
bf07547f240a
Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning (Los Angeles County 2015). General Plan
2035. Figure 12.5, Fire Hazard Severity Zones Policy Map. Adopted October 6, 2015. Available
at: https://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/Project/gp_2035_2021-FIG_12-
5_Fire_Hazard_Severity_Zones_Policy_Map_Responsibility.pdf
Stantec. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I 2021) (Appendix F).
Stantec. Remedial Excavation Completion Report (Excavation 2022) (Appendix G).
Cal Fire. California Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). Available: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
66
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER
QUALITY. Would the Project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water
quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the Project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or river
or through the addition of impervious surfaces,
in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to Project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
The discussion below is based on the Preliminary Hydrology Study and Low Impact Development
Plan, 2022. Prepared by C&V Consulting Inc. (Appendix H and I).
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
67
Less Than Significant Impact.
Construction
Construction of the Project would require grading and excavation of soils, which would loosen
sediment, and then have the potential to mix with surface water runoff and degrade water quality.
Additionally, construction would require the use of heavy equipment and construction-related
chemicals, such as concrete, cement, asphalt, fuels, oils, antifreeze, transmission fluid, grease, solvents
and paints. Without implementation of a SWPPP, these potentially harmful materials could be
accidentally spilled or improperly disposed of during construction and, if mixed with surface water
runoff, could wash into and pollute waters.
These types of water quality impacts during construction of the Project would be prevented through
implementation of a SWPPP. Construction of the Project would disturb more than one acre of soil;
therefore, the proposed Project would be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES General
Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity. Construction activity
subject to this permit includes clearing, grading, and ground disturbances such as trenching,
stockpiling, or excavation. The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a SWPPP
that is required to identify all potential sources of pollution that are reasonably expected to affect
the quality of storm water discharges from the construction site. The SWPPP would generally contain
a site map showing the construction perimeter, proposed buildings, stormwater collection and
discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the site,
and adjacent roadways. The SWPPP would also include construction BMPs.
Adherence to the existing requirements and implementation of the appropriate BMPs as ensured
through the City’s plan check and permitting process are included as PPP WQ-1, which would ensure
that the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements,
potential water quality degradation associated with construction activities would be minimized, and
impacts would be less than significant.
Operation
The new residential uses would introduce pollutants such as, chemicals from household cleaners,
nutrients from fertilizer, pesticides and sediments from landscaping, domestic trash and debris, and
oil and grease from vehicles without implementation of a WQMP. These pollutants could potentially
discharge into surface waters and result in degradation of water quality. Thus, the Project would
be required to comply with existing regulations that limit the potential for pollutants to discharge
from the site.
Chapter 13.16 of the City’s Municipal Code (and PPP WQ-2) requires implementation of a WQMP
based on the anticipated pollutants that could result from the Project. The BMP would include
pollutant source control features and pollutant treatment control features. Project drainage on the
site would include onsite catch basins, infiltration systems, and a detention pipe system to capture
and treat stormwater. Stormwater runoff would be conveyed via proposed onsite gutter and
directed to a curb inlet. Two additional catch basins would be located along the center of the
Project site to convey stormwater into the underground storm drain system. All onsite catch basins
would be connected by storm drainpipes to the drywell infiltration system for water quality
treatment.
With implementation of the WQMP, pursuant to the City Municipal Code, (included as PPP WQ-2);
which would be verified during the plan check and permitting process for the proposed Project, the
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
68
proposed Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements,
and impacts would be less than significant.
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project currently receives water from the California American
Water-Los Angeles District that receives a portion of the district’s water supply from the Baldwin
Hills Central Basin, San Marino Raymond Basin, Duarte Main San Gabriel Basin, and San Marino
Main San Gabriel Basin. The Basin adjudicated and water extractions are managed by the Water
District, which regulates the amount of groundwater pumped from the Basin and sets the Basin
Production Percentage for all pumpers. In addition, the Project would receive water supplies through
the City’s water supply and would not extract groundwater.
As described in the previous response, the Project would include onsite catch basins, infiltration
systems, and a detention pipe system to capture and treat stormwater. Stormwater runoff would
be conveyed via proposed onsite gutter and directed to a curb inlet. Two additional catch basins
would be located along the center of the Project site to convey stormwater into the underground
storm drain system. All onsite catch basins would be connected by storm drainpipes to the drywell
infiltration system for water quality treatment. The Project would implement water efficient
plumbing fixtures and would comply with the CalGreen Plumbing Code along with installing a water
efficient landscape irrigation system. Thus, the proposed Project would implement groundwater
recharge through onsite infiltration, and Project interference with groundwater recharge or
groundwater management would not occur from the Project. Impacts would be less than significant.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces,
in a manner which would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site;
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site does not contain, nor is adjacent to, a
stream, river, creek, or other flowing water body. Thus, impacts related to alteration of
the course of a stream or river would not occur. The Project site is relatively flat and
would drain into the internal stormwater system proposed.
Construction
Construction of the Project would require grading and excavation of soils, which would
loosen sediment and could result in erosion or siltation. However, as described
previously, construction of the proposed Project requires City approval of a SWPPP
prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer, as included by PPP WQ-1. The SWPPP is
required during the City’s plan check and permitting process and would include
construction BMPs to reduce erosion or siltation. Typical BMPs for erosion or siltation,
include use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, gravel bags, stabilized construction driveway, and
stockpile management (as described in the previous above). Adherence to the existing
requirements and implementation of the required BMPs per the plan check and
permitting process would ensure that erosion and siltation associated with construction
activities would be minimized, and impacts would be less than significant.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
69
Operation
The Project site is currently disturbed with a partially paved asphalt driveway. The
existing condition has 98.5% (3.33 acres) pervious area and 1.5% (0.05 acre)
impervious area. After development of the Project, the site would have 14% (0.47 acres)
pervious area and 86% (2.91 acres) impervious area. The proposed Project would
increase the overall impervious footprint by 84.5% (2.86 acres) However, the Project
would maintain the existing drainage patter and install a new onsite stormwater
drainage system. Pervious areas onsite would be landscaped and would not generate
soils that could erode. In addition, the proposed drainage infrastructure would slow and
retain stormwater, which would also limit the potential for erosion or siltation. Also, as
described previously, the City requires the Project to implement a WQMP (as included
by PPP WQ-2) that would implement BMPs, which reduce erosion and siltation. As a
result, stormwater runoff and the potential for erosion and siltation would not increase
with implementation of the proposed Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would not
alter the existing drainage pattern in the Project area and would not result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or offsite. Impacts would be less than significant.
ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite;
Less Than Significant Impact. As described in the previous response, the Project site
does not contain, nor is adjacent to, a stream, river, creek, or other flowing water body.
Thus, impacts related to alteration of the course of a stream or river would not occur. In
addition, the proposed Project would be required to implement a SWPPP (included as
PPP WQ-1) during construction that would implement BMPs, such as the use of silt
fencing, fiber rolls, and gravel bags, that would ensure that runoff would not
substantially increase during construction, and flooding on or off-site would not occur.
As described previously, after development of the Project, the site would have 14%
(0.47 acres) pervious area and 86% (2.91 acres) impervious area. The proposed
Project would increase the overall impervious footprint by 84.5% (2.86 acres) However,
the Project would implement an operational WQMP (as included by PPP WQ-2) that
would install an onsite storm drain system that would include a drywell system and
perforated storm drain piping for infiltration. Thus, the Project would not increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff, and flooding on or offsite would not occur. Impacts
would be less than significant.
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
Less Than Significant Impact. As described in the previous responses, the proposed
Project would be required to implement a SWPPP (included as PPP WQ-1) during
construction that would implement BMPs, such as the use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, and
gravel bags, that would ensure that runoff would not substantially increase during
construction, and that pollutants would not discharge from the Project site, which would
reduce potential impacts to drainage systems and water quality to a less than significant
level.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
70
As described previously, after development of the Project, the site would have 14%
(0.47 acres) pervious area and 86% (2.91 acres) impervious area. However, the Project
would implement an operational WQMP (included as PPP WQ-2) that would install an
onsite storm drain system that would include a drywell system with a filtration system
and perforated storm drain piping for infiltration. Thus, operation of the proposed
Project would not substantially increase stormwater runoff, and pollutants would be
filtered onsite. Impacts related to drainage systems and polluted runoff would be less
than significant with implementation of the existing requirements, which would be
verified during the plan check and permitting process.
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in Zone A per the Federal
Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel
06037C1675F (FEMA 2022). The site is identified as Zone A because it is located in an
area with a 1% annual chance of flooding and a 26% chance of flooding over a 30-
year period. Thus, the proposed Project would not impede or redirect flood flows, and
impacts would be less than significant.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to Project
inundation?
No Impact. The Project site is located in Zone A per the Federal Emergency Management
Administration (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 06037C1675F (FEMA 2022). Thus,
the Project would not be located in a flood hazard zone, which would result in release of pollutants
due to inundation of the site.
A seiche is a surface wave created when an inland body of water is shaken, usually by earthquake
activity. The site also is not subject to flooding hazards associated with a seiche because there are
no large body of surface water located near the Project site to result in effects related to a seiche,
which could result in release in pollutants due to inundation of the site.
The Pacific Ocean is located over 23 miles southwest of the Project site; consequently, there is no
potential for the Project site to be inundated by a tsunami that could release pollutants. In addition,
the Project site is flat and not located near any steep hillsides; therefore, there is no potential for
the site to be adversely affected by mudflow. Thus, implementation of the proposed Project would
not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by
seiche, tsunami, or mudflow that could release pollutants due to inundation of the Project site. No
impact would occur.
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
No Impact. As described previously, the Project would be required to have an approved SWPPP,
which would include construction BMPs to minimize the potential for construction related sources of
pollution. For operations, the proposed Project would be required to implement source control BMPs
to minimize the introduction of pollutants; and treatment control BMPs to treat runoff. With
implementation of the operational source and treatment control BMPs that would be required by
the City during the Project permitting and approval process (pursuant to PPP WQ-1 and PPP WQ-
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
71
2), potential pollutants would be reduced to the maximum extent feasible, and implementation of
the proposed Project would not obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan.
As described previously, water supplies are provided by the California American Water Los
Angeles County District that extracts water from the Central Basin. Groundwater pumping is
regulated through a Basin Production Percentage to ensure the groundwater supply is sustainable.
In addition, the Project would not extract groundwater. Thus, the proposed Project would not result
in the obstruction or conflict with a groundwater management plan, and impacts would be less than
significant.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP WQ-1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project
developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a Qualified
SWPPP Developer (QSD) in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16 and the Los
Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 (MS4 Permit). The SWPPP shall incorporate
all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other NPDES regulations to limit the potential
of erosion and polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to
ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by the
City of Rosemead staff to confirm compliance.
PPP WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project
applicant shall have a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) approved by the City for
implementation. The Project shall comply with the City’s Municipal Chapter 13.16 and the Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements in effect for the Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) at the time of grading permit to control discharges of sediments and other
pollutants during operations of the Project.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to hydrology and water quality are required.
Sources
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 2022). National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL)
Viewer. Map #06037C1675F. Available at:
https://msc.fema.gov/arcgis/rest/directories/arcgisjobs/nfhl_print/mscprintb_gpserver/j299a67
263b93496db1b7e5a6b3385648/scratch/FIRMETTE_b55c63a1-bff0-459b-8eda-
e45c330efd55.pdf
Preliminary Hydrology Study, 2022. Prepared by C&V Consulting Inc. (Appendix H).
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan, 2022. Prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc. (Appendix I).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
72
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would
the Project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due
to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental effect?
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The physical division of an established community could occur if a major road were built
through an established community or neighborhood, or if a major development was built which was
inconsistent with the land uses in the community such that it divided the community. The environmental
effects caused by such could include lack of a, or disruption of, access to services, schools, or
shopping areas. It could also include the creation of blighted buildings or areas due to the division
of the community.
The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped and is surrounded by a roadway to the south
followed by single-family residential development and a church, SCE powerlines, a plant nursery,
and Walnut Grove Avenue followed by single-family residential to the west, single-family
residential and a plant nursery to the north, and single-family residential to the east. The proposed
Project would develop the site to provide 37 two-story dwelling units which are consistent with the
existing residential development to the east and south of the site across Mission Drive. Therefore,
the change of the Project site from vacant and undeveloped to residential would not physically
divide an established community. In addition, the Project would not change roadways, or install any
infrastructure that would result in a physical division. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in
impacts related to physical division of an established community, and no impact would result.
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy,
or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
Less Than Significant Impact. As described previously, the Project site is located adjacent to
Mission Drive, residential development, a plant nursery, and a church. The Project would develop
the Project site to provide 37 new two-story dwelling units, which would be similar to the residential
uses that are located adjacent to, and across the street from the site.
General Plan
As the site is within an area developed with single-family residences, the site has a General Plan
land use designation of Low Density Residential. The Low Density Residential land use designation
is characterized by low-density residential neighborhoods consisting primarily of detached single-
family dwellings on individual lots with a maximum permitted density of 7 dwelling units per acre.
The proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
73
the site to Medium Density Residential that allows up to 12 dwelling units per acre. The General
Plan Land Use Element states that the Medium Density Residential land use allows for housing types
such as single-family detached homes on smaller lots, duplexes, and attached units. As the Project
would develop two-story dwelling units in the Medium Density Residential designation at a density
of 11 dwelling units per acre, it would be consistent with the proposed land use designations, and
the proposed change in land uses would be less than significant. In addition, the Project complies
with the policies set forth in the City’s General Plan as shown in Table LU-1, below.
Table LU-1: Project Consistency with General Plan Policies
City’s General Plan Policies Project Consistency
Policy 1.4: Through the Conditional Use Permit process,
Design Review process, residential design guidelines, or
zoning enforcement, regulate new and large residential
structures that compromise neighborhood quality
Consistent. The Project has been designed to be
consistent with the City’s development standards and
reviewed by the City’s planning department to ensure
development standards have been met.
Policy 1.5: Require that new single-family residential
construction, additions, and renovations be designed to
protect the privacy of adjacent residential properties
and the quality of established neighborhoods.
Consistent. As mentioned above, the Project has been
designed to be consistent with the City’s development
standards and reviewed by the City’s planning
department to ensure development standards have been
met.
Policy 1.6: Where the housing stock and neighborhood
design are of high quality, maintain and provide the
foundation for strong neighborhood interaction, and
ensure that the bulk and mass of new single-family
residential buildings or additions be of the same scale as
surrounding units within established residential
neighborhoods.
Consistent. The proposed Project would develop an
underutilized parcel and develop 37 two-story dwelling
units that would be similar in size and scale to the
surrounding residences.
Policy 1.7: Foster housing stock and neighborhood
revitalization, renovation, and good site/architectural
design.
Consistent. The Project would develop 37 two-story
dwelling units that would have a Spanish Colonial or
Hacienda architectural style.
Policy 1.8: Require that new single-family units utilize
detailed architectural articulations to promote the visual
character of neighborhoods and comply with the
adopted single family design guidelines.
Consistent. As discussed above, the Project would
include Spanish Colonial and Hacienda architectural
styles. Six color schemes would be utilized which include
shades of grey, blue, and brown. The Project would
comply with the City’s design standards.
Zoning
The Project site is currently zoned as R-1 Single-Family Residential, and the Project would change
the site’s zoning from R-1 Single-Family Residential to P-D Planned Development to allow for the
development of the dwelling units.
The P-D zone does not have a maximum building height and does not have a front or side setback
when adjoining residential, though a 5 ft or 10% of lot width setback is required. When adjoining
residential, there is a 5 ft or 10% of lot width front setback and the Project is required to adopt
the side setback of the zone it is abutting. As described previously, in Table AES-1, the proposed
Project meets or is within the P-D zoning requirements for building heights and setbacks.
Regarding lot size and coverage, the P-D zone allows a minimum lot area of one acre and maximum
density of 12 dwelling units per acre. As shown in Table AES-1, the Project site is 3.38 net acres
which exceeds the net acre minimum. The Project proposes to have a density of 11 dwelling units
per acre which is less than the maximum. Thus, the Project site and proposed Project would meet the
P-D lot size and coverage standards Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with any
applicable zoning regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect, and impacts would be less than significant.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
74
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to land use and planning that are
applicable to the Project.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to land use and planning are required.
Sources
City of Rosemead. Municipal Code. Available:
https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT13
PUSE_CH13.16STWAMA_13.16.010DE
City of Rosemead. General Plan. Available: https://cdn5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com
munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
75
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
Project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan
or other land use plan?
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
No Impact. According to the Special Report 209 from the California Geological Survey, the City
of Rosemead is not included in a list of lead agencies in the San Gabriel Valley P-C Region with
active mine operations, designated lands, or lands classified as Mineral Resource Zone 2 (MRZ-2)
within its jurisdiction (CGS 2010). Therefore, development of the site would not result in the loss of
availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of
the state. No impact would occur.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on the general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
No Impact. As described above, the Project site is not located within a region of known mineral
significance. The site has a General Plan designation of Low Density Residential, is in an urban and
developed area, and does not support mineral extraction activities onsite. Therefore,
implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of locally important mineral resources, and
impacts would not occur.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to mineral resources that are
applicable to the Project.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to mineral resources are required.
Sources
California Geological Survey (CGS 2010), Special Report 209, Update of Mineral Land
Classification for Portland Cement Concrete-Grade Aggregate in the San Gabriel Valley
Production-Consumption Region, Los Angeles County, California, 2010.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
76
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
13. NOISE. Would the Project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) For a Project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the Project expose people
residing or working in the Project area to
excessive noise levels?
The discussion below is based on the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis prepared by LSA, Inc.
(Noise 2022) (Appendix J).
Noise Element of the General Plan
The City of Rosemead General Plan addresses noise in its Noise Element (General Plan 2010). The
Noise Element contains goals and policies for noise control and abatement in the City. General noise
goals for Rosemead aim to attain a healthier and quieter environment for all citizens while
maintaining a reasonable level of economic progress and development. The City, consistent with the
California Office of Planning and Research, has established land use compatibility guidelines for
determining acceptable noise levels for specified land uses as shown in Table N-1. These land use
compatibility guidelines are intended to be an advisory resource when considering changes in land
use and policies, such as zoning modifications. The Issues, Goals, and Policies as well as the
Implementation Actions in the City’s General Plan Noise Element are designed to provide noise-
compatible land use relationships by establishing noise standards utilized for design and siting
purposes and minimize noise impacts from significant noise generators. The following goals and
policies are applicable to the proposed Project:
Goal 1: Effective incorporation of noise considerations into land use planning decisions.
• Policy 1.1: Ensure compliance with standards for interior and exterior noise established
within the Noise Element and Zoning Code.
• Policy 1.4: Encourage acoustical design in new construction
• Policy 1.5: Require sound walls to be constructed in designated mixed-use districts where
noise-sensitive land uses are located on adjacent properties.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
77
Goal 3: Effective implementation of measures to control non-transportation noise impacts.
• Action 1.2: Incorporate noise reduction features during site planning to mitigate anticipated
noise impacts on affected noise sensitive land uses. The noise contours, illustrated on the
Existing Noise Contours Map, identify areas within the City exposed to noise levels greater
than 60dB CNEL and shall be used to identify locations of potential conflict. Require
acoustical analyses, as appropriate, for proposed residential development within the 60 dB
CNEL or higher contour. New developments will be permitted only if appropriate mitigation
measures are included.
• Action 1.3: Enforce provisions of the California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24) that
specify that indoor noise levels for multi-family residential living spaces shall not exceed 45
dB CNEL. The standard is defined as the combined effect of all noise sources, and is
implemented when existing or future exterior noise levels exceed 60 dB CNEL. Title 24
further requires that the standard be applied to all new hotels, motels, apartment houses,
and dwellings other than detached single-family dwellings. The City will additionally apply
the standard to single-family dwellings and condominium conversion Projects.
Table N-1: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
78
Source: General Plan, 2010.
Municipal Code
Chapter 8.36.030 of the City’s Municipal Code limits construction and demolition activities to
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Construction
activities should not take place at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. No person shall operate
or allow the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, or alteration
or demolition work outside of these hours to prevent noise disturbances.
Chapter 8.36.060 of the City’s Municipal Code, Noise Standards, establishes limits on non-impulsive
noise where no person shall maintain, create, operate, or cause noise on private property to not
exceed the noise standards shown in Table D. The standards are applicable to all receptor
properties within a designated noise zone. This section also establishes an allowable interior noise
level of 45 dBA at all residential receptors during anytime of the day.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
79
Table N-2: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels
Noise Zone Type of Land Use
(Receptor Property)
Time Interval Allowable Exterior Noise
Level (dBA)
I Single-, double- or
multiple family residential
Daytime 60
Nighttime 45
II Commercial Daytime 65
Nighttime 60
III Industrial or manufacturing Anytime 70
Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J)
Federal Transit Administration
The construction noise threshold from Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2018), identifies
a significant construction noise impact if construction noise exceeds the thresholds exceed the dBA
in Table N-3 at the nearby sensitive receivers (e.g., residential, etc.).
Table N-3: Municipal Code Exterior Permitted Noise Levels
Land Use Daytime 1-hour Leq (dBA) Nighttime 1-hour Leq (dBA)
Residential 90 80
Commercial 100 100
Industrial 100 100
Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J)
Vibration standards included in the FTA manual are used in this analysis for ground-borne vibration
impacts on human annoyance and potential damage. Table F provides the criteria for assessing the
potential for interference or annoyance from vibration levels in a building. The criteria for
annoyance impacts resulting from ground-borne vibration and noise are based on the average
vibration levels during construction. Table N-4 provides the criteria for assessing the potential for
damage from vibration levels generated during construction to surrounding structures. Table N-5
below states the construction vibration damage criteria from the FTA.
Table N-4: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis
Land Use Max Lv (VdB) Description of Use
Workshop 90 Vibration that is distinctly felt.
Appropriate for workshops and
similar areas not as sensitive to
vibration
Office 84 Vibration can be felt. Appropriate
for offices and similar areas not as
sensitive to vibration.
Residential Day 78 Vibration that is barely felt.
Adequate for computer equipment
and low-power optical microscopes.
Residential Night and Operating
Rooms
72 Vibration is not felt, but ground-
borne noise may be audible inside
quiet rooms. Suitable for medium-
power microscopes and other
equipment of low sensitivity.
Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J)
Table N-5: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria
Building Category PPV (in/sec)
Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster) 0.50
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
80
Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.30
Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.20
Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12
Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J)
Existing Noise Levels
As detailed in the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Appendix F), to identify the existing ambient
noise level environment, two 24-hour noise level measurements and one short-term noise level
measurement were taken on the Project site (shown on Figure 9) between June 21, 2022 and June
22, 2022. The measured sound levels in dBA have been used to calculate the minimum and maximum
Leq averaged over 1-hour intervals. Table N-6 also shows the hourly noise levels (Leq) and daily
noise levels (CNEL), based on the entire measurement time. As shown in Table N-6, existing noise
levels on the Project site range from 50.6 to 57.0 dBA CNEL.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
81
Table N-6: Summary of 24-Hour Ambient Noise Level Measurements
Location Site Description Daytime Noise
Levels (dBA Leq) Evening Noise
Levels
(dBA Leq)
Nighttime Noise
Levels(dBA Leq) Average Daily
Noise Levels
(dBA CNEL)
LT-1 Southeastern
corner of Project
site, on a fence
along the
backyard of
8623 Mission
Drive.
50.9-62.5 49.2-56.1 42.6-52.1 57.0
LT-2 Western corner
of Project site,
bordering a
power line near
a fence next to
a power line
tower.
47.6-59.8 45.4-54.3 41.9-50.7 55.2
ST-1 Northeast corner
of Project site,
south of 8612
Zerelda Street.
43.0-55.2 40.8-49.7 37.3-46.1 50.6
Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis, 2022 (Appendix J)
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.
Construction
The construction activities for the proposed Project are anticipated to include demolition of the
partially paved driveway, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and
architectural coating. Construction of the proposed Project would occur over an 11-month period.
Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed Project would be a function
of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, sensitivity of nearby land
uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. Noise levels generated by heavy
construction equipment have the potential to range from approximately 73 dBA to 95 dBA at 50
feet in distance, as shown on Table N-7.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
82
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
83
Figure 9: Noise Measurement Locations
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
84
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
85
Table N-7: Construction Activity Noise Levels at 50 Feet
Equipment Description
Acoustical Use
Factor1 (percent)
Maximum Noise Level
at 50 Ft2 (Lmax)
Auker Drill Rig 20 84
Backhoes 40 80
Compactor (Ground) 20 80
Compressor 40 80
Cranes 16 85
Dozer 40 85
Dump truck 40 84
Excavators 40 85
Flat Bed Trucks 40 84
Forklift 20 85
Front-end Loaders 40 80
Graders 40 85
Impact Pile Drivers 20 95
Jackhammers 20 85
Paver 50 77
Pickup Truck 40 55
Pneumatic Tools 50 85
Pumps 50 77
Rock Drills 20 85
Rollers 20 85
Scrapers 40 85
Tractors 40 84
Trencher 50 80
Welder 40 73
Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis (Appendix F)
Per the City’s Noise Ordinance, the Project would comply with the construction hours specified which
states that the construction activities are allowed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Monday through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays. The proposed Project’s construction
activities would occur pursuant to these regulations, which is included as PPP NOI-1 and would be
detailed in the construction permits. Therefore, Project construction would be compliant with the
City’s noise related standards and impacts related to standards would be less than significant.
Neither the City’s General Plan nor Municipal Code establish numeric maximum acceptable
construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow for a quantified
determination of what CEQA constitutes a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase. Thus,
the construction noise thresholds from the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2018),
have been utilized, which identifies a significant construction noise impact if construction noise
exceeds 90 dBA at sensitive receptors. The nearest sensitive receptors to the Project site are the
single-family residences located to the east, approximately 115 feet from the property line.
Modeling of the construction noise to the location of the existing sensitive receptors is summarized
in Table N-8, which shows that construction noise at the closest sensitive receptors is anticipated to
range from 69 dBA Leq to 81 dBA Leq, which is less than the 90 dBA threshold. Therefore, noise
impacts would be less than significant. In addition, the construction noise over the 11-month period
would be temporary in nature as the operation of each piece of construction equipment would not
be constant throughout the construction day, and equipment would be turned off when not in use.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
86
The typical operating cycle for a piece of construction equipment involves one or two minutes of full
power operation followed by three or four minutes at lower power settings.
Table N-8: Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptors
Receptor (Location) Composite Noise Level
(dBA Leq) at 50 feet
Distance (feet) Composite Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
Residences (East) 88 115 81
Residences (West) 350 71
Residences (North) 350 71
Residences (South) 430 69
Source: Noise and Vibration Analysis (Appendix F)
Overall, as temporary construction activity would occur in compliance with the City’s regulations and
would be less than the noise level threshold at existing sensitive receptors, impacts related to
construction noise would be less than significant.
Operation
The proposed Project would result in the operation of 37 two-story dwelling units. Potential noise
impacts associated with the Project would be from Project-generated vehicular traffic on the nearby
roadways. In addition, the proposed development would be adjacent to Mission Drive and in close
proximity to Walnut Grove Avenue, which may create exterior and interior noise levels in excess
of City standards at the proposed residences.
Once the proposed residences are constructed and inhabited, noise levels generated at the
project site would occur from stationary equipment such as heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning (HVAC) units that would be installed for the new development, internal street and
driveway vehicle movements, trash removal activity, and activity at outdoor gathering areas.
Typical noise levels from onsite operations at 50 feet from the noise source include the following:
• Air Conditioning Unit: 54.4 dBA
• Trash Enclosure Activity: 49.0 dBA
• Parking Lot Vehicle Movements: 33.5 dBA
• Outdoor Community Recreation Activity: 48.7 dBA
Typically, air conditioning units and trash enclosures are located away from sensitive receivers and
shielded to ensure that noise from operation of the units and trash pickup does not have the potential
to result in an impact. The project would not result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise
levels in excess of standards established in the City Noise Ordinance or the General Plan Noise
Element.
Vehicular Noise. Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust and
tires. The level of traffic noise depends on three primary factors (1) the volume of traffic, (2) the
speed of traffic, and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of traffic. The proposed Project is a
residential Project that would not result in a substantial number of truck trips and the proposed
Project would not alter the speed limit on any existing roadway so the proposed Project’s potential
offsite noise impacts have been focused on the noise impacts associated with the change of volume
of traffic that would occur with development of the proposed Project.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
87
The trip generation prepared for the Project determined that the Project would generate 349
average daily trips. The expected traffic volume on the adjacent segment of Mission drive could
be as low as 15,000 (City of Rosemead General Plan 2010). The results of the Noise Analysis
determined that an increase of approximately 0.1 dBA CNEL is expected along the streets adjacent
to the Project site. A noise increase of less than 1 dBA would not be perceptible to the human ear.
Therefore, the traffic noise increase in the vicinity of the Project site resulting from the proposed
Project would be less than significant.
Exterior Noise. The City has a 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standard. Based on the monitoring
results shown in Table N-6, the existing measured noise levels at the Project site closest to Mission
Drive, approximately 95 feet away from Mission Drive centerline, is 57.0 dBA CNEL. Based on the
Project site plan, the rear yards of units 1-4 and 37 are approximately 45 feet away from Mission
Drive centerline, resulting in estimated noise levels approaching 62 dBA, without accounting for
shielding provided by the proposed 6ft wall, which would reduce the noise levels by 5 dBA or
more, resulting in noise levels below 60 dBA. Thus, Thus, impacts would be less than significant.
Interior Noise. As described in the Noise Impact Analysis, per the California Code of Regulations
and the City’s Implementation Actions, an interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL or less is
required for all noise-sensitive rooms. Based on the expected future exterior noise levels at the
façades of the lots closest to Mission Drive approaching 62 dBA CNEL, a minimum noise reduction
of 17 dBA would be required. Based on reference information from transmission loss test reports
for various Milgard windows (Milgard 2008), standard building construction along with standard
windows, typically in the STC 25- 28 range, a reduction of 25 dBA or more would be achieved
with windows in a closed position. With a reduction of 25 dBA or more, interior noise levels would
remain below the City’s interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL. The Project includes a HVAC
system for all unit so that windows can remained closed.
Thus, the Project would not generation a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. Therefore, impacts would be less
than significant.
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The City does not have quantified
vibration standards applicable to the proposed Project. However, the FTA provides criteria for
assessing the potential for interference or annoyance from vibration levels in a building as shown
in Table N-4. Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending
on the equipment used on the site. Operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations
that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Buildings in the vicinity of
the construction site respond to these vibrations with varying results ranging from no perceptible
effects at the low levels to slight damage at the highest levels. Table N-9 provides vibration levels
for particular construction activities at a distance of 25 feet.
Table N-9: Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment at 25 Feet
Equipment
Peak Particle Velocity
(inches/second)
Approximate Vibration Level
(Lv)at 25 feet
Pile Driver
(Impact), Typical 0.644 104
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
88
Pile Driver
(Sonic), Typical 0.170 93
Vibratory Roller 0.210 94
Hoe Ram 0.089 87
Large Bulldozer 0.089 87
Caisson Drilling 0.089 87
Loaded Trucks 0.076 86
Jackhammer 0.035 79
Small Bulldozer 0.003 58
Source: Noise Impact Analysis (Appendix F).
The primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of a pile driver.
Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest offsite sensitive receptors
(single-family residences to the east) would be 0.995 inch per second PPV when construction occurs
at the property line, which would exceed the 0.2 inch per second PPV threshold detailed above.
Therefore, Mitigation Measure NOI-1 is included to prohibit the use of heavy equipment within 15
feet of existing residences to the north and west to ensure that vibration levels are below the 0.2
PPV (in/sec) threshold. Thus, with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1, impacts related to
construction vibration would be less than significant.
c) For a Project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive
noise levels?
No Impact. There are no airports within two miles of the Project site. The closest airport is the San
Gabriel Valley Airport that is located 2.6 miles east of the Project site. Similarly, the Project site is
not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not expose people residing or working
in the Project area to excessive noise levels related to an airstrip. No impacts related to airport or
airstrip noise would occur from implementation of the Project.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP NOI-1: Construction Hours. Per Municipal Code Chapter 8.36, construction and demolition
activities may only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including
Saturday. Construction activities should not take place at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday.
No person shall operate or allow the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction,
drilling, repair, or alteration or demolition work outside of these hours to prevent noise disturbances.
PPP NOI-2: Best Construction Practices. In addition to compliance with the City’s Municipal Code
allowed hours of construction of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, excluding
Sunday and holidays, the following recommendations would reduce construction noise to the extent
feasible:
• The Project construction contractor should equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile,
with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers, consistent with manufacturer’s
standards.
• The Project construction contractor should locate staging areas away from off-site sensitive
uses during the later phases of Project development.
• The Project construction contractor should place all stationary construction equipment so that
emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the Project site whenever
feasible.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
89
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Construction Vibration. Project plans and specifications shall include
the requirement that that operation of any heavy equipment shall be prohibited within 15 feet of
existing residences to the north and east. If heavy equipment is necessary within 15 feet of existing
structures, the following measures shall be implemented.
• Identify structures that could be affected by ground-borne vibration and would be located
within 15 feet of where heavy construction equipment would be used. This task shall be
conducted by a qualified structural engineer as approved by the City’s Director of
Community Development or designee.
• Develop a vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan for approval by the City’s
Director of Community Development, or designee, to identify structures where monitoring
would be conducted; set up a vibration monitoring schedule; define structure-specific
vibration limits; and address the need to conduct photo, elevation, and crack surveys to
document before and after construction conditions. Construction contingencies such as
alternative methods or equipment that would generate lower vibration levels would be
identified for when vibration levels approached the limits.
• At a minimum, monitor vibration during initial demolition activities. Monitoring results may
indicate the need for more intensive measurements if vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV
(in/sec) threshold.
• When vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) limit, suspend construction and
implement contingencies identified in the approved vibration monitoring and construction
contingency plan to either lower vibration levels or secure the affected structures.
Sources
Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis prepared by LSA. (Noise 2022) (Appendix F).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
90
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
14. POPULATION AND HOUSING.
Would the Project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people
or housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would construct 37 two-story dwelling units on the Project
site. The California Department of Finance (CDF) data details that the City of Rosemead had a
residential population of 50,025 and 15,001 residential units in 2022. Of these, 11,257 (57
percent) are single-family detached units, and 1,437 are attached units (9.6 percent). The CDF
data details that 14,505 of the units are occupied (households) and that the vacancy rate within
the City is 3.3 percent. In addition, it is estimated that the City has an average of 3.45 persons per
household.
Based on this information, the proposed 37 two-story dwelling units would result in an increase of
approximately 128 new residents. The addition of 128 new residents would represent a population
increase of 1.2 percent and the new housing units would result in a 0.256 percent increase in
residential units within the City. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
Demographics and Growth Forecast (SCAG 2020) anticipates a City population of 60,300 in year
2045, which is an increase of 10,275 persons over the year 2022 population; and forecasts 16,500
households in the City in year 2045, which is an increase of 1,499 residential units over the number
of units in 2022. The 37 residential units developed by the proposed Project would equate to 2.47
percent of the forecasted growth in residential units, which is a limited amount of the Projected
growth in residential housing. Thus, the Project would not directly result in substantial unplanned
growth.
Also, the proposed Project is located in an urbanized residential area of the City and is surrounded
by residential, park, plant nursery, and church uses and is already served by the existing roadways
and infrastructure systems. No infrastructure would be extended or constructed to serve areas
beyond the Project site, and indirect impacts related to growth would not occur from implementation
of the proposed Project. Therefore, potential impacts related to inducement of unplanned
population growth, either directly or indirectly, would be less than significant.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction
of replacement housing elsewhere?
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
91
No Impact. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped and does not contain any housing.
The Project would develop the site to construct 37 two-story dwelling units. No people or housing
would be displaced by implementation of the proposed Project. Conversely, housing would be
developed by the Project. Thus, no impact would occur.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to population and housing are
applicable to the Project.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to population and housing are required.
Sources
California Department of Finance. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the
State, 2020-2022. Accessed: https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5-
population-and-housing-estimates-for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2022/
Southern California Association of Governments Demographics and Growth Forecast. Table 14
Jurisdiction-Level Growth Forecast, September 2020. Accessed:
https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-
growth-forecast.pdf?1606001579
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
92
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
15. PUBLIC SERVICES.
a) Would the Project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Fire Protection – Less than Significant Impact. The Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) currently
provides services to the Project site and surrounding area. LAFD has two fire stations that provide
services to the Project site, including fire prevention and suppression, emergency medical services,
technical rescue, and hazardous materials response. The closest fire station to the Project site is Fire
Station 42, located at 9319 E. Valley Blvd, which is approximately 1.1 mile southeast of the site.
Fire Station 4, located at 2644 N San Gabriel Blvd, which is approximately 2.4 miles southwest of
the Project site. Station 4 responded to 3,218 incidents in fiscal year 2021-2022 with an arrival
time within five minutes for 48.34% of calls. Station 42 responded to 2,815 incidents in fiscal year
2021-2022 with an arrival time within five minutes for 45.01% of calls.1
1 Data received from Gina Cortez, Los Angeles County Fire Department Planning Division
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
93
The proposed Project would develop 37 residential dwelling units. Implementation of the Project
would be required to adhere to California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9 of the California Code of
Regulations) included in Section 8.24.010 of the City’s Municipal Code, which regulates fire-resistant
construction, emergency planning, fire protection system, and appropriate emergency access
throughout the site. As part of the permitting process, the Project plans would be reviewed by the
City’s Building and Safety Division to ensure that the fire protection requirements are met.
Due to the small increase in onsite people that would occur from implementation of the Project, an
incremental increase in demand for fire protection and emergency medical services would occur.
However, the increase in residents onsite is limited (128 residents) and would not increase demands
such that the existing two fire stations would not be able to accommodate servicing the Project in
addition to its existing commitments. Provision of a new or physically altered fire station would not
be required that could cause environmental impacts. Therefore, impacts related to fire protection
services from the proposed Project would be less than significant.
Police Protection - Less than Significant Impact. The Los Angeles County Sheriff Department (LASD)
provides policing services for the City of Rosemead. The Temple City Station is located at 8838 E
Las Tunas Drive, approximately 1.6 miles northeast of the Project site. Approximately 176 sworn
and 33 non-sworn support personnel are assigned to the City2. Based on the CDF population data
for the City in January, 2022 of 50,511, the City has approximately 3.5 sworn officers per 1,000
residents.
Development of the proposed 37 residential dwelling units would result in an incremental increase
in demands on law enforcement services. However, the increase would not be significant when
compared to the current demand levels. As described previously, the residential population of the
Project site at full occupancy would be approximately 128 residents and based on the Police
Department’s staffing of 3.5 officers per thousand population, the proposed Project would require
0.45 percent of an additional officer.
Since the need by the Project is less than one full-time officer at the existing staffing ratio, the
Project would not require the construction or expansion of the City’s existing policing facilities. Thus,
substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or expanded facilities
would not occur. Thus, impacts related to police services would be less than significant.
Schools – Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in Rosemead School District (K-8)
and El Monte Union High School District (9-12). The public schools that serve the Project site are:
• Emma W. Shuey Elementary School (K-6)
• Muscatel Middle School (7-8)
• Rosemead High School (9-12)
2 Data received from Deputy Marshall Los Angeles Sheriff Department
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
94
Table PS-1: School Capacity and Project Generated Students
School 2021-2022
Enrollment
2020-2021
Enrollment1
2019-
2020
2018-
2019
2017-
2018
2016-
2017
2015-
2016
Emma W.
Shuey
Elementary
School
514 460 486 491 477 498 516
Muscatel
Middle
School
555 569 556 570 621 660 654
Rosemead
High School
1,704 1,787 1,806 1,844 1,847 1,813 1,805
1 Source: California Department of Education, Accessed: https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/
The State Office of Public School Construction utilizes a student yield factor of 0.7 students per
dwelling unit. Using this factor, the proposed 37 residences could result in approximately 26 new
students that would range in age from elementary through high school. The 26 students would range
in age from elementary school to high school. As shown in Table PS-1 above, Muscatel Middle
School and Rosemead High School are operating at less capacity than previous years. Rosemead
School District is currently at 78% of its capacity with room to accommodate 892 more students.
Thus, the addition of 26 students would be accommodated by the schools existing capacities. In
addition, as required by all Projects within the City, the proposed Project is required to pay School
Mitigation Impact fees, as included by PPP PS-1. Therefore, impacts related to schools would be
less than significant.
Parks – Less than Significant Impact. The City of Rosemead has approximately 43.25 acres of
parkland. In addition, the Whittier Narrows Recreational Area is immediately southeast of the City
and provides an additional 1,092 acres of parkland. Of this parkland, 19.5 acres are within 1 mile
of the Project site.
• Guess Park located which is approximately 300 feet from the Project site. This park is 0.25
acre and consists of a greenbelt.
• Sally Tanner Park which is approximately 0.4 mile from the Project site. This park is 1.25
acres and consists of a playground, pathways, benches, and picnic tables.
• Rosemead Park which is approximately 0.7 mile from the Project site. This park is 18 acres
and consists of a skate park, picnic tables, a swimming pool, and playground.
The Project would develop 37 residential dwelling units and 1,664 SF of central common open
space for use by residents. There’s an additional 15,654 SF of common open space throughout the
Project site that would be used for active recreation. Thus, the Project proposes a total of 17,318
SF of open space recreation area on the site for use by residents. As described previously,
approximately 128 new residents would occur from the proposed Project. Due to the limited
increase in population from implementation of the Project and provision of onsite open space and
recreational facilities, the Project would not require the construction or expansion of any existing
park facility. Thus, substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
expanded facilities would not occur.
In addition, the impacts of development of the proposed 17,318 square foot open space recreation
area on the site are considered part of the impacts of the proposed Project as a whole and are
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
95
analyzed throughout the various sections of this MND. For example, activities such as excavation,
grading, and construction as required for the park are analyzed in the Air Quality, Greenhouse
Gas Emissions, Noise, and Transportation Sections.
Other Public Facilities – Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would develop the
Project site with 37 residential dwelling units within an area that already contains residential land
uses. The additional residences would result in a limited incremental increase in the need for
additional services, such as public libraries and post offices, etc. Because the Project area is already
served by other services and the Project would result in a limited increase in population, the Project
would not result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to provide other services, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. Therefore, impacts would be
less than significant.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP PS-1: School Fees. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide
payment of the appropriate fees set forth by the applicable school districts related to the funding
of school facilities pursuant to Government Code Section 65995 et seq.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to public services are required.
Sources
California Department of Education Data Quest. Accessed:
https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/dataquest.asp
City of Rosemead Municipal Code. Accessed:
https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT13
PUSE_CH13.16STWAMA_13.16.010DE
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Temple Sheriff’s Station. Accessed:
https://lasd.org/temple/
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
96
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
16. RECREATION.
a) Would the Project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the Project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities
such that physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would develop 37 two-story dwelling units and 17,298
square feet of common open space that would be provided throughout the development for
recreational use by residents. Therefore, some of the Project’s park and recreational demand would
be met by the provision of the onsite facilities. The City currently has approximately 43.25 acres
of park and recreation facilities. Additionally, Whittier Narrows, a regional park, is located just
outside Rosemead City limits in unincorporated Los Angeles County and is greater than 1,000 acres
in size. The Project site is within one mile of 20.25 acres of parkland including Guess Park located
directly east of the site, across Walnut Grove Avenue. As described previously in the population
discussion, the approximately 128 new residents would equate to approximately 3 new residents
per acre of park and recreational area that is within one mile of the site. Due to the limited increase
in population from implementation of the Project, provision of onsite open space and recreational
facilities, and the amount of existing recreation facilities near the site, impacts related to the
increase in the use of existing parks and recreational facilities, such that physical deterioration of
the facility would be accelerated would be less than significant.
b) Include or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have
an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Less than Significant Impact. As described above, the Project includes 17,298 square feet of open
space recreation area. The impacts of development of the park are considered part of the impacts
of the proposed Project as a whole and are analyzed throughout the various sections of this MND.
For example, activities such as excavation, grading, and construction as required for the recreation
area are analyzed in the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, and Transportation
Sections.
Also, as described in the previous response, the approximately 128 new residents would equate to
approximately 3 new residents per existing acre of park and recreational area that is within one
mile of the site. Thus, the Project would have a limited increase in use of existing public recreation
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
97
facilities and would not require the construction or expansion of other recreational facilities that
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. As a result, impacts would be less than
significant.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to recreation are applicable to
the Project.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to recreation are required.
Sources
City of Rosemead General Plan. Accessed: https://cdn5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com
munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
98
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
17. TRANSPORTATION. Would the Project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system, including
transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities?
b) Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
The discussion below is based on the Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis
prepared EPD Solutions, Inc. (Traffic 2022) (Appendix K)
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site would develop 3.378 acres of land with a new
residential development that would provide haul truck access during construction and vehicular
access during operation. Access would be provided via Mission Drive. The Project proposes a 20-
foot-wide entry driveway and 20-foot-wide exit driveway along Mission Drive.
Roadway: Construction activities associated with the Project would generate vehicular trips from
construction workers traveling to and from the Project site, delivery of construction supplies and
import materials to, and export of debris from, the Project site. However, these activities would only
occur for an estimated time period of 11 months. The increase of trips during construction activities
would be limited and would not exceed the number of daily operational trips described below.
The short-term vehicle trips from construction of the Project would generate less than significant
operational impacts to roadways.
Construction activities of the Project would generate vehicular trips from construction workers
traveling to and from Project site, delivery of construction supplies and import materials to, and
export of debris from the Project site. However, these activities would only occur for a period of
11 months. Construction of the proposed Project would require 56 haul trips that would occur over
the 11-month period.
Bicycle: The Project site and surrounding area do not currently support bicycle infrastructure.
However, Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue were defined as potential new bike lanes in the
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
99
City’s General Plan. The proposed Project would not alter or conflict with plans to implement new
bike lanes along Mission Drive or Walnut Grove Avenue.
Pedestrian Facilities: As previously described, the Project site and surrounding roadways have
existing sidewalks.. New sidewalk improvements would be included along Mission Drive to facilitate
Project design and access. Therefore, the Project would result in no impacts to pedestrian facilities.
The Project would be consistent with the City of Rosemead General Plan Circulation Element and
would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than
significant.
b) Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
Less than Significant Impact. Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed by Governor Brown in 2013 and
required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to amend the CEQA Guidelines to
provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating Transportation impacts. SB 743 specified that the new
criteria should promote the reduction of GHG emissions, the development of multimodal
transportation networks and a diversity of land uses. In response, Section 15064.3 was added to
the CEQA Guidelines that became effective on July 1, 2020 and requires that Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) be evaluated for impacts and provides lead agencies with the discretion to choose
the most appropriate methodology and thresholds for its evaluation.
VMT Screening Thresholds
The City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines provides VMT screening thresholds to identify Projects
that would be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT and therefore could be
screened out from further analysis. If a Project meets one of the following criteria as shown below,
then the VMT impact of the Project would be considered less than significant and no further analysis
would be required.
1. The project is in a Transit Priority Area (TPA).
2. The project is in a low VMT area.
3. The project proposes one of the following local-serving land uses:
• Local-serving retail less than 50,000 sf in size, including:
o Gas stations
o Banks
o Restaurants
o Shopping Center
• Local serving K-12 school
• Local park
• Daycare centers
• Local-serving hotel (e.g., non-destination hotel)
• Student housing projects on or adjacent to a college campus
• Local-serving assembly use (places of worship, community organizations)
• Community institutions (public libraries, fire stations, local government)
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
100
• Affordable, supportive, or transitional housing
• Assisted living facilities
• Senior housing (as defined by Housing and Urban Development)
• Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the
• RTP/SCS (Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy)
• Project generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips. This generally corresponds to the
following “typical” development potentials:
o 11 single family housing units
o 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units
o 10,000 SF of office
o 15,000 SF of light industrial
o 63,000 SF of warehousing
o 79,000 SF of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse
• Public parking garages and public parking lots
A portion of the Project site is located within a TPA, however the entire site is not within the TPA.
Therefore, the Project does not satisfy Screening Criteria 1. Screening Criteria 2 defines low VMT
areas as traffic analysis zones (TAZs) with a total daily VMT/service Population that is 15% less
than the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) baseline. If the proposed Project
is residential, the Project is considered to screen out if it is located within the Low VMT areas. As
stated in the City’s guidelines, projects that are located in areas with predominately similar land
uses can utilize the SGCVOG screening tool. To ensure that the project is consistent with the land
uses that are evaluated in the project Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) in the SGVCOG screening tool,
the socioeconomic data in SCAG model TAZ 22180100 was examined. TAZ 22180100 is bounded
by Mission drive on the south, the train tracks on the north, Muscatel Avenue on the east and the
Rubio Wash on the west. The north portion of the TAZ is currently developed with employment uses
while the south portion (south of Grand) is residential. The 2016 base model includes 515
households with a population of 1,511 persons. The zone also includes 645 employees. Therefore,
the project is consistent with both the existing land uses and the land uses evaluated in the SCAG
model and therefore the SGVCOG screening tool. Thus, the SGVCOG tool was appropriate to use
for the Project.
As shown in the Appendix K, the project TAZ 22180100 has a VMT per Service Population of
26.78. The baseline VMT per Service Population is 34.9 percent, therefore a low VMT area would
be a TAZ where the VMT per Service Population is 29.67 or lower. As noted previously, the VMT
per Service Population of the project TAZ is 26.78 and therefore the project is located in a low
VMT area and would meet Screening Criteria 2 – Low VMT Area.
Table TR-1 below shows the trip generation for the proposed Project.
Table TR-1: Proposed Project Trip Generation
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
101
Source: Trip Generation and VMT Screening Memo (Appendix K)
The proposed Project is a residential development within an urbanized area that is served by
transit. The Project site is surrounded by other residential uses and is in a low VMT area based on
the SGCVCOG screening analysis. Therefore, it is legally presumed to have less than significant
VMT impacts, and no further analysis is required. However, we note for informational purposes that
as described previously, the Project vicinity receives public transit services from the City of
Rosemead through the Rosemead Explorer. The Rosemead Explorer operated Monday through
Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekends. The closest stop to
the Project site is located near Rosemead High School, approximately 0.7 mile away. Therefore,
residents at the site would have direct and convenient to existing local and regional transit services,
which would further support the reduction of VMT.
The Project would also support pedestrian circulation. As detailed in the previous response, new
onsite sidewalks would be developed to connect to currently existing sidewalks that are adjacent
to the site along Mission Drive and provide pathways throughout the Project site. This would
facilitate pedestrian use and walking to nearby locations, such as the nearby schools and park
facilities. Therefore, the Project meets the intent of SB 743 to support multimodal transportation and
a diversity of interrelated land uses, such as residential, schools, and parks.
As detailed previously on Table TR-1, the proposed 37 residential dwelling units would generate
349 daily trips. The CalEEMod modeling of the GHG emissions that would be generated by
operation of the proposed Project identified (in Table GHG-1) that operational activities of the
Project would generate 613 MTCO2e annually, which is substantially less than the 3,000 MTCO2e
screening threshold. For all of the above reasons including that it is legally presumed to cause less
than significant impacts, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to VMT.
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would develop and operate 37 residential dwelling units
on the site. None of the proposed structures would include incompatible uses such as farm equipment.
The Project would also not increase any hazards related to a design feature. The onsite driveways
would be developed in conformance with City design standards. The City’s construction permitting
process includes review of Project plans to ensure that no potentially hazardous transportation
design features would be introduced by the Project. For example, the design of the onsite circulation
would has been reviewed to ensure fire engine accessibility is provided to the fire code standards.
Also, access to the Project site would be provided by a 20-foot-wide entry driveway and 20-foot-
wide exit driveway along Mission Drive that would be designed in compliance with the City’s design
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
102
standards to provide for adequate turning for passenger cars, fire trucks, and delivery trucks. As a
result, impacts related to geometric design feature would be less than significant.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The proposed Project would develop and operate residential dwelling units that would
be permitted and approved in compliance with existing safety regulations, such as the California
Building Code and Fire Code (as integrated into the City’s Municipal Code) to ensure that it would
not result in inadequate emergency access.
The proposed construction activities, including equipment and supply staging and storage, would
occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site
or adjacent areas. During construction, Mission Drive would remain open to ensure adequate
emergency access to the Project area and vicinity. Thus, impacts related to inadequate emergency
access during construction activities would not occur.
As described above, operation of the proposed Project would also not result in inadequate
emergency access. Direct access to the Project site would be provided from Mission Drive. The
driveways and on-site circulation constructed by the Project would be evaluated through the City’s
permitting procedures to meet the City’s design standards that provides adequate turning space
for passenger cars, fire trucks, and delivery trucks. The Project is also required to provide fire
suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants and sprinklers). The LAFD would review the development plans
as part of the plan check and permitting procedures to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant
to the requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of
Regulations, Part 9). As a result, impacts related to inadequate emergency access would not occur.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to transportation that are
applicable to the Project.
Mitigation Measure
No mitigation measures related to transportation are required.
Sources
City of Rosemead General Plan Update Circulation Element. Accessed: https://cdn5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com
munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf
City of Rosemead Public Transportation. Accessed:
https://www.cityofrosemead.org/cms/one.aspx?pageId=10909050
Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Memo, prepared by EPD Solutions, Inc. (VMT
2022) (Appendix K).
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
103
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.
Would the Project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code
section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American tribe,
and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
b) A resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe?
Assembly Bill 52
Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014 (Assembly Bill [AB] 52), requires that Lead Agencies evaluate a
Project’s potential to impact “tribal cultural resources.” Such resources include “[s]ites, features,
places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native
American tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or
included in a local register of historical resources.” AB 52 also gives lead agencies the discretion to
determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a resource qualifies as a “tribal cultural
resource.” Also, per AB 52 (specifically PRC 21080.3.1), Native American consultation is required
upon request by a California Native American tribe that has previously requested that the City
provide it with notice of such Projects.
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
No Impact. The Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the Project site, indicated that a church
was constructed on the Project site between 1953 and 1964 but was demolished in 1992. The
structure was not listed in the CRHR files. The site is currently vacant and does not contain any
structures. Therefore, the Project site is not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of historical resources. The proposed Project would not result in an
impact to a historical resource.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
104
An archaeological record search from the South-Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at
California State University, Fullerton was completed in order to identify any previously recorded
archaeological site within the Project boundary or in the immediate vicinity. According to the records
search, 21 resources are located within a one-half-mile radius of the site, one of which is located
within the site. The Southern California Edison Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Transmission Line is
located within the site. The transmission line is still present running above the property, however,
none of the steel lattice towers, steel poles, or wood poles are within the Project site. The records
search also identified 13 cultural resource reports conducted within on-half mile of the site, none of
which included the subject property.
b)A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Cultural Resources Assessment
prepared for the Project site, includes aerial photographs describing that the site was used for
agricultural uses from approximately 1928 through the 1950’s and a small residential structure
was located on the southeast corner of the site. A large commercial structure was developed on the
southern portion of the site in the 1960’s that was later removed in the 1990’s. The site is currently
vacant and does not contain any structures.
The Project would excavate and recompact the upper two feet of onsite soils. The Project grading
is anticipated to remain within the fill material but has the potential to encroach into native soils that
have not been previously disturbed.
A search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) was requested for the Project by the Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC results were found to be positive for the presence of
sacred site or locations of religious or ceremonial importance within the search radius and the NAHC
recommended contacting the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. Pursuant to the
requirements of AB 52, the City sent informational letters about the proposed Project and requests
for consultation to each tribe on the City’s list of tribes requesting consultation on June 14, 2022.
These tribes include the following: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation,
Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Gabrielino/Tongva Nation, Gabrielino
Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council, Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council,
Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians,
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians.
On June 28, 2022, the City received an e-mailed response to the City’s AB 52 outreach letters,
which was from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh nation requesting consultation be
scheduled if ground disturbance were to occur. Consultation occurred via email between June 28,
2022 and September 20, 2022. The consultation included provision of information that the Project
site includes fill materials over native alluvial soils. The tribe Chairman, Andy Salas, provided
modifications to proposed Project. The measure has been included as Mitigation Measure TCR-1
that provides tribal monitoring of initial site clearing (such as pavement removal) and ground-
disturbing activities.
Also, as described previously, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 has been included to provide procedures
to be followed in the event that potential resources are discovered during grading, excavation, or
construction activities. As detailed previously, if the discovered resource(s) appears Native American
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
105
in origin, a Native American Monitor shall be contacted to evaluate any potential tribal cultural
resource(s) and shall have the opportunity to consult on appropriate treatment and curation of these
resources. Additionally, as described previously (and included as PPP CUL-1), California Health
and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered in the Project site,
disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation.
If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact,
by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Thus, impacts related to
California Native American tribe resources would be less than significant with implementation of
Mitigation Measures TCR-1and CUL-1; and PPP CUL-1.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural Resources.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural
Resources.
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural
Resources.
Sources
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR 2005). Tribal Consultation Guidelines,
Supplement to General Plan Guidelines. November 14, 2005. Available at:
http://nahc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/SB-18-Tribal-Consultation-Guidelines.pdf
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
106
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.
Would the Project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the Project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the Project’s Projected demand in addition
to the provider’s existing commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards or in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
Less than Significant Impact.
Water Infrastructure
The proposed Project is within an urbanized, developed area of Rosemead. The Project would
install new onsite potable water lines that would connect to existing 6-inch water lines in Mission
Drive. The new onsite water system would convey water supplies to the proposed residences and
landscaping through plumbing/landscaping fixtures that are compliant with the CalGreen Plumbing
Code and the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.08 for efficient use of water.
The proposed Project would receive water supplies through the existing water lines located within
the Mission Drive right-of-way that have the capacity to provide the increased water supplies
needed to serve the proposed Project, and no expansions of the water pipelines that convey water
to the Project site would be required. Installation of the new water distribution lines on the site would
only serve the proposed Project and would not provide new water supplies to any offsite areas.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
107
The construction activities related to the onsite water infrastructure that would be needed to serve
the proposed residences is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any
physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this MND. For example,
construction emissions for excavation and installation of the water infrastructure is included in
Sections 3, Air Quality and 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and noise volumes from these activities are
evaluated in Section 13, Noise. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the construction
of new water facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects, and impacts would be less than significant.
Wastewater Treatment
The Project site is currently served by the existing 8-inch sewer line within Mission Drive. The Project
includes installation of onsite 8-inch sewer lines that would connect to the existing 8-inch sewer line
in Mission Drive. The Project site is served by the Los Angeles Sanitary District.
The construction activities related to installation of the onsite sewer infrastructure that would serve
the proposed Project, is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any
physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this MND. For example,
construction emissions for excavation and installation of the sewer infrastructure is included in Section
3, Air Quality and 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and noise volumes from these activities are
evaluated in Section 13, Noise. As the proposed Project includes facilities to serve the proposed
development, it would not result in the need for construction of other new wastewater facilities or
expansions, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Therefore,
impacts would be less than significant.
Stormwater Drainage
The Project would maintain the existing stormwater flow pattern. The existing condition has 98.5%
(3.33 acres) pervious area and 1.5% (0.05 acre) impervious area. After development of the
Project, the site would have 14% (0.47 acres) pervious area and 86% (2.91 acres) impervious
area. The proposed Project would increase the overall impervious footprint by 84.5% (2.86 acres),
which would increase offsite stormwater drainage. However, The Project would install new onsite
catch basins, infiltration systems, and a detention pipe system to capture and treat stormwater.
Stormwater would be infiltrated by a proposed onsite drywell system.
Because the Project would reduce impervious surfaces, and the drywell and storm drain system have
been sized to accommodate required flows, the proposed Project would not result in an increase
stormwater runoff. Thus, the Project would not require or result in the construction of new offsite
stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing offsite facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects. The required installation of onsite drainage features
is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any physical environmental
effects beyond those identified in other sections of this IS/MND. Overall, impacts related to
stormwater drainage facilities would be less than significant.
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
Less than Significant Impact. According to the California American Water Los Angeles County
District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the District receives water supplies from
groundwater, surface water, purchased and imported water, and recycled water. In 2020, the
District had a total supply of 19,453 AFY of groundwater from the Central, Duarte, and San Marino
Basins, imported water, and surface water. The District also had a total water demand of 19,453
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
108
AF in 2020. The UWMP Projects that demands will steadily increase through 2045 with a maximum
of 22,618 AFY in 2045 (UWMP 2020). MWD has completed its water service reliability assessment
in their Draft 2020 UWMP and determined that, under the conditions required by the UWMP, it
has supply capabilities sufficient to meet expected demands from 2025 through 2045 under a
single dry- year condition and period of drought lasting five consecutive water years, as well as in
a normal water year hydrologic condition as shown in Table UT-1, below. (Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California, 2021).
Table UT-1: District Supply Reliability – Average, Single Dry Year, & Multiple Dry Years
Water
Sources
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Normal Year
Supply
21,595 21,894 22,193 22,405 22,618
Normal Year
Demand
21,595 21,894 22,193 22,405 22,618
Single Dry
Year Supply
24,650 24,991 25,332 25,574 25,817
Single Dry
Year Demand
24,605 24,991 25,332 25,574 25,817
Multiple Dry
Years Supply
(1st Year)
23,966 24,298 24,629 24,865 25,101
Multiple Dry
Years
Demand
(1st Year)
23,966 24,298 24,629 24,865 25,101
Multiple Dry
Years Supply
(2nd Year)
24,718 25,059 25,380 25,623 25,101
Multiple Dry
Years
Demand (2nd
Year)
24,718 25,059 25,380 25,623 25,101
Multiple Dry
Years Supply
(3rd Year)
24,073 24,404 24,697 24,932 N/A
Multiple Dry
Years
Demand (3rd
Year)
24,073 24,404 24,697 24,932 N/A
Multiple Dry
Years Supply
(4th Year)
19,200 19,463 19,681 19,868 N/A
Multiple Dry
Years
Demand (4th
Year)
19,200 19,463 19,681 19,868 N/A
Multiple Dry
Years Supply
(5th Year)
19,342 19,607 19,810 19,999 N/A
Multiple Dry
Years Supply
(5th Year)
19,342 19,607 19,810 19,999 N/A
Source: California American Water Los Angeles Country District 2020 UWMP
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
109
The UWMP estimates water demand based on the water use target of 187 gallons per capita
daily. As described in Section 14, Population and Housing, the proposed 37 residential units are
anticipated to result in approximately 128 new residents. Based on the UWMP water estimates,
the Project would result in a water demand of 23,936 gallons per day (26.81acre feet per year).
The Project’s demand of 26.81 acre-feet equates to 0.8 percent of the anticipated increase in
water demand. Based on the City’s UWMP supply and demand data and the limited increase in
water demand from the proposed Project, the City would have water supplies available to serve
the Project. In addition, the Project would limit water use by inclusion of low-flow plumbing and
irrigation fixtures, pursuant to the California Title 24 requirements. Therefore, the proposed Project
would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project, and impacts would be less than
significant.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve
the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s Projected demand in addition
to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would generate wastewater flows, which would
be conveyed through an existing 8-inch sewer line in Mission Drive to the District’s 18-inch diameter
truck sewer which has a capacity of 5.9 million gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow
of 0.7 mgd. The wastewater generated by the proposed Project would be treated at the San Jose
Creek Water Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 100 mgd and currently processes an
average flow of 66.9 mgd (CalRecycle 2022). In the event that biosolids and wastewater flow
exceed the capacity of the San Jose Creek, excess flows would be diverted to, and treated at, the
Joint Water Pollution Control Plan in the City of Caron (Appendix L). The expected wastewater
flow from the Project site is 9,100 gallons per day. In addition, a Sewer Area Study (Appendix M)
was conducted to investigate the sewage discharge route along Mission Drive and ensure there is
adequate sewer capacity for the proposed Project. The study concluded that the existing sewer
system has a design capacity above the calculated cumulative flow from the proposed Project. Thus,
the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant would be able to accommodate the wastewater flow
from the Project, and impacts related to the wastewater treatment system would be less than
significant.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards or in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would generate solid waste that would be hauled to the
Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility in the City of Whittier that is operated by the Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County. The Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility is permitted to accept
up to 4,400 tons per day (8,800,000 pounds/day) of municipal solid waste.
Construction
Project construction would generate solid waste for landfill disposal in the form of demolition debris
from the existing pavement and infrastructure that would be removed from the site. Demolition
waste would be properly characterized as required by law and recycled or disposed of at an
appropriate type of landfill for such materials. Construction waste in the form of packaging and
discarded materials would also be generated by the proposed Project. Section 5.408.1 of the
2016 California Green Building Standards Code and the City Municipal Code Chapter 50.64
requires demolition and construction activities to recycle or reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the
nonhazardous construction and demolition waste. Thus, the demolition and construction solid waste
that would be disposed of at the landfill would be approximately 35 percent of the waste
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
110
generated. Therefore, demolition activities which includes removal of the partially paved road on
the Project site would not result in substantial waste.
As described above, the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility has capacity of approximately
4,400 tons per day. Therefore, the facility would be able to accommodate the addition of
demolition of the partial road on the proposed Project site, and impacts would be less than
significant.
Operation
The CalEEMod solid waste generation rate for residential land use is 0.41 tons per resident per
year. As described previously, full occupancy of the proposed Project would generate
approximately 128 residents. Thus, operation of the Project would generate approximately 52.48
tons per solid waste per year; or 0.99 tons per week. However, at least 75 percent of the solid
waste is required by AB 341 and Municipal Code Chapter 8.32 to be recycled, which would reduce
the volume of landfilled solid waste to approximately 495 pounds per week. As the Puente Hills
Materials Recovery Facility has a maximum capacity of approximately 4,400 tons per day, the
solid waste generated by the Project would be within the capacity of the landfill. Thus, the proposed
Project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the
Project’s solid waste disposal needs and the Project would not impair the attainment of solid waste
reduction goals. Impacts related to landfill capacity would be less than significant.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
No Impact. The proposed Project would result in new development that would generate an
increased amount of solid waste. All solid waste-generating activities within the City is subject to
the requirements set forth in Section 5.408.1 of the 2016 California Green Building Standards
Code that requires demolition and construction activities to recycle or reuse a minimum of 65 percent
of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste, and AB 341 that requires diversion of a
minimum of 75 percent of operational solid waste, as included in Municipal Code Chapter 8.32.
Implementation of the proposed Project would be consistent with all state regulations, as ensured
through the City’s development Project permitting process. Therefore, the proposed Project would
comply with all solid waste statute and regulations; and impacts would not occur.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP UT-1: Solid Waste. As required by Municipal Code Chapter 8.32, Section 8.32.010 of the
2016 California Green Building Standards Code, and AB 341 the Project shall implement a Waste
Management Plan to ensure that the construction and operational diversion requirements would be
met.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to utilities and service systems are required.
Sources
CalReycyle Disposal Reporting System: Jurisdiction Tons by Facility(CalRecycle 2022). Accessed:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
111
California American Water Los Angeles District UWMP (UWMP 2022). Accessed:
https://wuedata.water.ca.gov/public/uwmp_attachments/6241132438/CAW%20LA%20Distric
t%202020%20UWMP_with%20Appendicies_Final.pdf
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
112
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
20. WILDFIRES. If located in or near state
responsibility areas or lands classified as very
high fire hazard severity zones, would the
Project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose Project occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines
or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk
or that may result in temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. According to the California Fire Hazard Severity Zones mapping, the City of Rosemead
(including the Project site) is not within a Very High Fire Hazard zone. Direct access to the Project
site would be provided from a 40-foot-wide driveway along Mission Drive. The Project is required
to design and construct internal access and provide fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants and
sprinklers) in conformance with the City’s Municipal Code, and the Fire Department would review
the development plans prior to approval to ensure adequate emergency access. pursuant to the
requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations,
Part 9, included in the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 8.24, California Fire Code as amended by
Los Angeles County Fire Code). As a result, the proposed Project would not impair an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and impacts not occur.
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose Project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled
spread of a wildfire?
No Impact. As described in the previous response, the Project site is not located within a Very High
Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 357 to
363 feet above mean sea level. The areas within the Project’s vicinity also do not contain hillsides
or other factors that could exacerbate wildfire risks. therefore, no impact would occur.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
113
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire
risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
No Impact. As described in the previous responses, the Project site is not within a Very High Fire
Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is located within an urbanized area within the City of
Rosemead. The Project does not involve any new infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risks or result in
other impacts to the environment. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
No Impact. As described in the previous responses, the Project site is not within a Very High Fire
Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 357 to 363
feet above mean sea level. Likewise, areas adjacent to the Project site are relatively flat urban
sites that do not contain hillsides or other factors that would expose people or structures to flooding
or landslides as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. The Project would
not generate slopes and would connect to existing drainage facilities. Thus, the Project would not
result in risks related to wildfires or risks related to downslope or downstream flooding or landslides
after wildfires. Therefore, impacts would not occur.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
There are no impact reducing Plans, Programs, or Policies related to wildfires that are applicable
to the Project.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to wildfires are required.
Sources
State Geoportal. California Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). Available:
https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/CALFIRE-Forestry::california-fire-hazard-severity-zones-fhsz
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
114
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Does the Project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the Project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a Project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
Projects, the effects of other current Projects, and
the effects of probable future Projects)?
c) Does the Project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
a) Does the Project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As described in Section 4, Biological Resources,
the Project site is located within an urban area and currently disturbed and vacant. No endangered,
rare, threatened, or special status plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species
designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and
Wildlife (CDFW), or California Native Plant Society (CNPS) occur on the site. The proposed Project
would develop the Project site with 37 residential units, which would include installation of new
ornamental landscaping. As no sensitive species or habitats are located within the urban and
developed site, implementation of the Project would not reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, or impact a plant
or animal community.
However, the Project site contains ornamental trees that could be used for nesting by common bird
species that are protected by the federal MBTA and the California Fish and Game Code Sections
3503.5, 3511, and 3515. These bird species are protected during the avian nesting and breeding
season, which occurs between February 1 and September 15. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO-
1 has been included to require a nesting bird survey if construction commences during nesting
season. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
115
As described in Section 5, Cultural Resources, the Project site does not contain any buildings or
structures that meet any of the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register)
criteria or qualify as “historical resources” as defined by CEQA. Therefore, the proposed Project
would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.
However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 has been included to provide procedures to be followed in
the event that potential archaeological resources are discovered during grading, excavation, or
construction activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1, impacts related to
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory would be less than
significant.
b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a Project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past Projects, the effects of
other current Projects, and the effects of probable future Projects)?
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project would redevelop the Project site
for 37 residential units within a developed area. The Project would provide land uses that are
consistent with the adjacent residential uses. As described above, all of the potential impacts related
to implementation of the Project would be less than significant or reduced to a less than significant
level with implementation of mitigation measures that are imposed by the City that effectively
reduce environmental impacts.
The cumulative effect of the proposed Project taken into consideration with other development
projects in the area would be limited, because the Project would develop the site with a slighter
higher density than the General Plan land use designation, zoning designation, and County code,
and would not result in substantial effects to any environmental resource topic, as described
throughout this document.
As discussed in Section 3, Air Quality, SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook methodology
describes that any projects that result in daily emissions that exceed any of these thresholds would
have both an individually (project-level) and cumulatively significant air quality impact. If estimated
emissions are less than the thresholds, impacts would be considered less than significant. As shown
in Table AQ-2, CalEEMod results indicate that construction emissions generated by the proposed
Project would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Operational emissions associated with the
proposed Project were modeled using CalEEMod and are presented in Table AQ-3. As shown, the
proposed Project would result in long-term regional emissions of the criteria pollutants that would
be below the SCAQMD’s applicable thresholds. Therefore, the Project’s operational emissions would
not exceed the NAAQS and CAAQS, would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant impacts, and operational impacts would be less than significant.
As discussed in Section 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, global climate change occurs as the result of
global emissions of GHGs. An individual development Project does not have the potential to result
in direct and significant global climate change effects in the absence of cumulative sources of GHGs.
The Project’s total annual GHG emissions at buildout would not exceed the annual GHG emissions
threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. As shown on Table GHG-1, the Project would result in approximately
613 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the Project would not result in cumulative impacts related to
GHG emissions.
The Project meets the City’s VMT screening criteria for residential projects. Therefore, the proposed
Project would have a less than significant cumulative impact related to VMT. Therefore, cumulatively
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
116
considerable transportation related impacts would be less than significant.
Given that the potential Project-related impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level,
implementation of the Project would not result in impacts that are cumulatively considerable when
evaluated with the impacts of other current projects, or the effects of probable future projects.
Therefore, the Project’s contribution to any significant cumulative impacts would be less than
cumulatively considerable. As discussed throughout this IS/MND, mitigation would be required and
incorporated as necessary. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation
incorporated.
c) Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project proposes development of the
Project site for residential uses. As described previously, the Project site is within an urban area and
surrounded by consistent land uses. The Project would not consist of any use or any activities that
would result in a substantial negative affect on persons in the vicinity. This includes potential impacts
related to construction, demolition, and the proposed residential activities. All resource topics
associated with the proposed Project have been analyzed in accordance with CEQA and the State
CEQA Guidelines and were found to pose no impacts or less-than-significant impacts with
implementation of mitigation measures related to biological resources, cultural resources,
paleontological resources, noise, and tribal cultural resources; and existing plans, programs, or
policies that are required by the City. Consequently, with mitigation, the proposed Project would
result in less than significant direct and indirect environmental effects on human beings.
Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP AES-1: Light and Glare. As listed in Section 1, Aesthetics.
PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. As listed in Section 2, Air Quality.
PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. As listed in Section 2, Air Quality.
PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. As listed in Section 2, Air Quality.
PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. As listed in Section 5, Cultural Resources.
PPP E-1: CalGreen Compliance. As listed in Section 6, Energy.
PPP GEO-1: California Building Code. As listed in Section 7, Geology and Soils.
PPP WQ1: SWPPP. As listed in Section 7, Geology and Soils.
PPP WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. As listed in Section 10, Hydrology and Water
Quality.
PPP NOI-1: Construction Hours. As listed in Section 13, Noise.
PPP NOI-2: Best Construction Practices. As listed in Section 13, Noise.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
117
PPP PS-1: School Fees. As listed in Section 15, Public Services.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Migratory Bird Treaty Act. As listed in Section 4, Biological Resources.
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. As listed in Section 5, Cultural Resources.
Mitigation Measure PAL-1: Incidental Discoveries. As listed in Section 7, Geology and Soils.
Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Construction Vibration. As listed in Section 13, Noise.
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. As listed in Section 18, Tribal Cultural
Resources.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
118
5 GENERAL REFERENCES
City of Rosemead Municipal Code. Accessed:
https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CD_ORD_TIT13
PUSE_CH13.16STWAMA_13.16.010DE
City of Rosemead General Plan. Accessed: https://cdn5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City%20Departments/Com
munity%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
119
6 DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
Lead Agency:
City of Rosemead
8838 Valley Blvd
Rosemead, CA 91770
Contact Person and Phone Number: Annie Lao, (626) 569-2144
CEQA Document Preparer:
Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc.
Konnie Dobreva, JD
Brooke Blandino
Heather Roberts
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Analysis, Appendix A
Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc.
Alex J. Garber
General Biological Assessment, Appendix B
Hernandez Environmental Services.
Shawn Hernandez
Cultural Resources Assessment, Appendix C
Brian F. Smith and Associates
Brian F. Smith, MA
Elena C. Goralogia, BA
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Appendix D
Albus & Associates, Inc
David E. Albus, Principal Engineer
Paleontological Resources Assessment, Appendix E
Brian F. Smith and Associates
Brian F. Smith, MA
Elena C. Goralogia, BA
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Appendix F
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Alicia Jansen, Associate Scientist
Joshua Sargent, MS, PG
Kyle Emerson, PG, CEG
Remedial Excavation Completion Report, Appendix G
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Brian Viggiano, PG,
Kyle Emerson, CEG
Preliminary Hydrology Study, Appendix H
C&V Consulting, Inc.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
120
Ryan Bittner, P.E.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan, Appendix I
C&V Consulting, Inc.
Ryan Bittner, PE
Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis, Appendix J
LSA
JT Stephens
Trip Generation and VMT Analysis, Appendix K
Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc.
Meghan Macias, TE
Sewer Will Serve Letter for 8601 Mission Drive, Appendix L
Los Angeles County Sanitation District
Robert C. Ferrante
Sewer Area Study VTTM No. 83705, Appendix M
C&V Consulting, Inc.
Dane P. McDougall, RCE
Mission Villas Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
121
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 2. Response to Public Comments
City of Rosemead 2-1
Final MND
December 2022
Chapter 2. Response to Comments on the Public Review
Draft MND
This memo contains responses to the comments that the City of Rosemead (Lead Agency) received on the
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Mission Villas Residential Project during the public review
period, which began November 10, 2022, and closed November 30, 2022 (SCH No. 2022110230). This
document has been prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended
(Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, §
15000 et seq.) and represents the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. This document and the
circulated IS/MND together comprise the Final MND.
The following letter was submitted to the City during the public review period:
1. Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Received November 28, 2022 (2 pages)
The public comments and responses to comments are included in the public record and are available to the
Lead Agency decision-makers for their review and consideration prior to making their decision. Pursuant to
CEQA Statute Section 21155.2(b)(5), none of the comments provide substantial evidence that the Project will
have significant environmental effects which would require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report.
None of this new material indicates that the Project will result in a significant environmental impact or an
increase in a less than significant impact previously disclosed in the Mission Villas Residential Project MND.
This Response to Comments includes minor revisions to the Public Review Draft MND based upon: (1)
clarifications required to prepare a response to a specific comment; and/or (2) typographical errors. These
revisions do not alter any impact conclusions that are disclosed in the MND. Revisions to the MND are outlined
in Chapter 3, MND Errata.
Although CEQA Statute Section 21155 does not require a Lead Agency to prepare written responses to
comments received, the City of Rosemead has elected to prepare the following written responses with the
intent of conducting a comprehensive and meaningful evaluation of the proposed Project. The number
designations in the responses are correlated to the bracketed and identified portions of each comment letter.
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 2. Response to Public Comments
City of Rosemead 2-2
Final MND
December 2022
Letter A1: Los Angeles County Sanitation District (2 pages)
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 2. Response to Public Comments
City of Rosemead 2-3
Final MND
December 2022
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 2. Response to Public Comments
City of Rosemead 2-4
Final MND
December 2022
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER A1: Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
Comment A1.1: This comment introduces the comment letter, and states that the commenter offers comments
on sewage service. The comment states that the wastewater would discharge to a local sewer line then
convey to the District’s Grand Avenue Trunk Sewer located in Mission Drive. The comment also states that the
18-inch diameter trunk sewer has a capacity of 5.9 million gallons per day (mgd) and a peak flow of 0.7
mgd. Chapter 3 of the Final MND has been revised to include a description of the 18-inch diameter trunk
sewer line. Therefore, no further analysis is warranted.
Comment A1.2: This comment states that the wastewater will be treated at the Whittier Narrows Water
Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 15 mgd and currently processes an average recycled flow of 8.3
mgd or the Los Coyotes WRP which has a capacity of 37.5 mgd and currently processes an average recycled
flow of 17.5 mgd. Chapter 3 of the Final MND has been revised to include a description of the two
wastewater treatment plants. Therefore, no further response is warranted.
Comment 1.3: This comment states that the expected wastewater flow from the Project is expected to be
10,036 gallons per day (gpd) and provides a link to the copy of the District’s average wastewater
generation factors. Chapter 3 of the Final MND has been revised to include the 10,036 (gpd). The change
from 9,100 gpd to 10,036 gpd is minimal and would remain within the existing sewer capacity Therefore,
impacts would remain less than significant and no further analysis is warranted.
Comment A1.4: This comment states that a connection fee may be required before the Project is permitted
to discharge to the Districts’ Sewerage System. The comment also breaks down how the connection fees are
determined. The comment does not contain any information regarding CEQA or requiring changes to the
MND. No further response is warranted.
Comment A1.5: This comment states that the capacities of the Districts’ wastewater treatment facilities are
based on the regional growth forecast adopted by SCAG. The comment also states that the letter does not
constitute a guarantee of wastewater service but is to advise the developer that the Districts intend to provide
the service up to the levels that are legally permitted. The comment does not contain any information
regarding CEQA or provide comments on the adequacy of the Draft MND. Thus, no further response is
warranted.
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 3. Errata
City of Rosemead 3-1
Final MND
December 2022
Chapter 3. Errata to the Mission Villas Residential Project
MND
This section contains revisions to the Public Review Draft MND based upon: (1) clarifications required to
prepare a response to a specific comment; and/or (2) typographical errors. These revisions do not alter any
impact significance conclusions as disclosed in the MND. Changes made to the MND are identified here in
strikeout text to indicate deletions and in bold underlined text to signify additions.
Revisions in Response to Written Comments and County Changes to Text
The following text, organized by MND Chapters and Sections, has been revised in response to comments
received on the MND and corrections identified by the City.
18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Threshold b on page 104 will be revised as follows:
On June 28, 2022, the City received an e-mailed response to the City’s AB 52 outreach letters,
which was from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh nation requesting consultation be
scheduled if ground disturbance were to occur. Consultation occurred via email between June 28,
2022 and XX September 20, 2022. The consultation included provision of information that the
Project site includes fill materials over native alluvial soils. The tribe Chairman, Andy Salas, provided
modifications to proposed Project. The measure has been included as Mitigation Measure TCR-1
that provides tribal monitoring of initial site clearing (such as pavement removal) and ground-
disturbing activities.
19 Utilities and Service Systems
Threshold a on page 107 will be revised as follows:
Wastewater Treatment
The Project site is currently served by the existing 8-inch sewer line within Mission Drive. The Project
includes installation of onsite 8-inch sewer lines that would connect to the existing local 8-inch sewer
line in Mission Drive. The line would convey to the Los Angeles Sanitary District’s 18-inch trunk
sewer line in Grand Avenue. The Project site is served by the Los Angeles Sanitary District.
The construction activities related to installation of the onsite sewer infrastructure that would serve
the proposed Project, is included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any
physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this MND. For example,
construction emissions for excavation and installation of the sewer infrastructure is included in Section
3, Air Quality and 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and noise volumes from these activities are
evaluated in Section 13, Noise. As the proposed Project includes facilities to serve the proposed
development, it would not result in the need for construction of other new wastewater facilities or
expansions, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Therefore,
impacts would be less than significant.
Threshold c on page 109 will be revised as follows:
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would generate wastewater flows, which would
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 3. Errata
City of Rosemead 3-2
Final MND
December 2022
be conveyed through an existing 8-inch sewer line in Mission Drive to the District’s 18-inch diameter
truck sewer which has a capacity of 5.9 million gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow
of 0.7 mgd. The wastewater generated by the proposed Project would be treated at the Whittier
Narrows Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 15 mgd and currently processes an
average recycled flow of 8.3 mgd or the Los Coyotes Water Reclamation Plant which has a
capacity of 37.5 mgd and currently processes an average recycled flow of 17.5 mgd. the San
Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant which has a capacity of 100 mgd and currently processes an
average flow of 66.9 mgd (CalRecycle 2022). In the event that biosolids and wastewater flow
exceed the capacity of the San Jose Creek, excess flows would be diverted to, and treated at, the
Joint Water Pollution Control Plan in the City of Caron (Appendix L). The expected wastewater
flow from the Project site is 10,036 9,100 gallons per day. In addition, a Sewer Area Study
(Appendix M) was conducted to investigate the sewage discharge route along Mission Drive and
ensure there is adequate sewer capacity for the proposed Project. The study concluded that the
existing sewer system has a design capacity above the calculated cumulative flow from the
proposed Project. Thus, the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant would be able to
accommodate the wastewater flow from the Project, and impacts related to the wastewater
treatment system would be less than significant.
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
City of Rosemead 4-1
Final MND
December 2022
Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Introduction
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead or public agency that approves or carries
out a project for which an Mitigated Negative Declaration has been certified which identifies one or more
significant adverse environmental effects and where findings with respect to changes or alterations in the
project have been made, to adopt a “…reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project
which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects
on the environment” (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21081, 21081.6).
A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is required to ensure that adopted mitigation
measures are successfully implemented. The City of Rosemead is the Lead Agency for the Project and is
responsible for implementation of the MMRP. This report describes the MMRP for the Project and identifies
the parties that will be responsible for monitoring implementation of the individual mitigation measures in
the MMRP.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The MMRP for the Project will be active through all phases of the Project, including design, construction, and
operation. The attached table identifies the mitigation program required to be implemented by the City for
the Project. The table identifies mitigation measures required by the City to mitigate or avoid significant
impacts associated with the implementation of the Project, the timing of implementation, and the responsible
party or parties for monitoring compliance.
The MMRP also includes a column that will be used by the compliance monitor (individual responsible for
monitoring compliance) to document when implementation of the measure is completed. As individual Plan,
Program, Policies; and mitigation measures are completed, the compliance monitor will sign and date the
MMRP, indicating that the required actions have been completed.
Mission Villas Residential Project
Chapter 4 MMRP
City of Rosemead 4-2
Final MND
December 2022
This page intentionally left blank.
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-3
TABLE 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
MM BIO-1: Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Prior to commencement of grading
activities, the City Building Department, shall verify that in the event that
vegetation and tree removal activities occur within the active breeding season
for birds (February 1–September 15), the Project applicant (or their Construction
Contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist (meaning a professional biologist
that is familiar with local birds and their nesting behaviors) to conduct a nesting
bird survey no more than 3 days prior to commencement of construction activities.
The nesting survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent
to the site that could potentially be affected by Project-related construction
activities, such as noise, human activity, and dust, etc. If active nesting of birds is
observed within 100 feet of the designated construction area prior to
construction, the qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate buffer around
the active nests (e.g., as much as 500 feet for raptors and 300 feet for non-
raptors [subject to the recommendations of the qualified biologist]), and the
buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the
juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests.
Submittal of pre-activity
field survey results report.
Prior to construction.
City of Rosemead
CULTURAL RESOURCES
MM CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. The Applicant shall retain a qualified
archaeologist to perform archaeological monitoring and the archaeologist shall
be present during initial ground-disturbing activities (e.g., site preparation and
grading) to identify and assess any known or suspected archaeological and/or
cultural resource. The qualified archaeologist shall develop a Cultural Resources
Management Plan to address the details, timing, and responsibility of all
archaeological and cultural resource activities that occur on the Project site. The
plan shall include a scope of work, project grading and development scheduling,
pre-construction meeting (with consultants, contractors, and monitors), a
monitoring schedule during all initial ground-disturbance related activities, safety
requirements, and protocols to follow in the event of previously unknown cultural
resources discoveries that could be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The
plan shall be submitted to the City and the Consulting Tribe(s) for review and
Confirmation of
professional archaeologist
retention/ongoing/monito
ring/submittal of Report
of Findings. Prior to
Grading Permit and
during subsurface
excavation.
City of Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-4
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
comment, prior to final approval by the City.
MM TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. Prior to the commencement of any
ground disturbing activity at the Project site, the Project applicant shall retain a
Native American Monitor approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-
Kizh Nation. A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of
Rosemead Planning and Building Department prior to the issuance of any permit
necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The Tribal monitor shall
only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-
disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as
activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing
or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and
trenching, within the Project area. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily
monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including
construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The
on-site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project
site are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have
indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing activities at the Project site have
little to no potential to impact Tribal Cultural Resources.
Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resources, construction activities shall cease
in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until
the find can be assessed. All Tribal Cultural Resources unearthed by Project
activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor
approved by the Consulting Tribe. If the resources are Native American in origin,
the Consulting Tribe shall retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe
deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If human
remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the Project site,
all ground disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county coroner shall be
notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health & Safety Code
Section 7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike
per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Work may
continue on other parts of the Project site while evaluation and, if necessary,
mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a non-Native
American resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a
Submit a CRMP prepared
by Professional
Archaeologist in
consultation with Tribe.
Prior to Grading Permit.
Qualified Professional
Archeologist/ City of
Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-5
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
“historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and
funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or
appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for
the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f)
for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological
resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of
treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include
implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the
resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic
archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at
a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an
institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the
archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society
in the area for educational purposes.
PALEONTOLOGICAL
MM PAL-1: Incidental Discoveries. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the
City of Rosemead Planning Department shall verify that all Project grading and
construction plans and specifications state that in the event that potential
paleontological resources are discovered during excavation, grading, or
construction activities, work shall cease within 50 feet of the find until a qualified
paleontologist (i.e., a practicing paleontologist that is recognized in the
paleontological community and is proficient in vertebrate paleontology) from the
City or County List of Qualified Paleontologists has evaluated the find and
established a protocol for addressing the find, in accordance with federal and
state regulations. Construction personnel shall not collect or move any
paleontological materials and associated materials. If any fossil remains are
discovered, the paleontologist shall make a recommendation if monitoring shall
be required for the continuance of earth moving activities, and shall provide such
monitoring if required.
Submittal of a
Paleontological Resource
Impact Mitigation Plan.
Prior to Grading Permit.
City of Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-6
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
NOISE
Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Construction Vibration. Project plans and
specifications shall include the requirement that that operation of any heavy
equipment shall be prohibited within 15 feet of existing residences to the north
and east. If heavy equipment is necessary within 15 feet of existing structures,
the following measures shall be implemented.
• Identify structures that could be affected by ground-borne vibration
and would be located within 15 feet of where heavy construction
equipment would be used. This task shall be conducted by a qualified
structural engineer as approved by the City’s Director of Community
Development or designee.
• Develop a vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan for
approval by the City’s Director of Community Development, or
designee, to identify structures where monitoring would be conducted;
set up a vibration monitoring schedule; define structure-specific
vibration limits; and address the need to conduct photo, elevation, and
crack surveys to document before and after construction conditions.
Construction contingencies such as alternative methods or equipment that
would generate lower vibration levels would be identified for when
vibration levels approached the limits.
• At a minimum, monitor vibration during initial demolition activities.
Monitoring results may indicate the need for more intensive
measurements if vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec)
threshold.
• When vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) limit, suspend
construction and implement contingencies identified in the approved
vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan to either lower
vibration levels or secure the affected structures.
Notes on grading plans.
Prior to grading permit.
City of Rosemead
TRIBAL
MM CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. See Cultural Mitigation above Confirmation of
professional archaeologist
City of Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-7
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
retention/ongoing/monito
ring/submittal of Report
of Findings. Prior to
Grading Permit and
during subsurface
excavation.
MM TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. See Cultural Mitigation above Submit a CRMP prepared
by Professional
Archaeologist in
consultation with Tribe.
Prior to Grading Permit.
Qualified Professional
Archeologist/ City of
Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-8
PPP Action and Timing
Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed and
Initials
AESTHETICS
PPP AES-1: Light and Glare. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 17.88,
exterior lighting shall be of low intensity and shielded so that light will not spill
out onto surrounding properties or Project above the horizontal plane.
Compliance with
Municipal Code Chapter
17.88
City of Rosemead
AIR QUALITY
PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. The construction plans and specifications shall state that
the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 402. The Project shall not discharge from
any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which
cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of
persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety
of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to
cause, injury or damage to business or property.
Compliance with Rule
402. Construction.
City of Rosemead
PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The construction plans and specifications shall state that
the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which includes the following:
• All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease
when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit
fugitive dust emissions.
• The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and
disturbed areas within the Project are watered, with complete coverage
of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily during dry weather;
preferably in the mid-morning, afternoon, and after work is done for
the day.
• The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and
Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less.
Compliance with Rule
402. Construction.
City of Rosemead
PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. The construction plans and specifications shall state that
the Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality
Management District Rule (SCAQMD) Rule 1113. Only “Low-Volatile Organic
Compounds” paints (no more than 50 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure
Low Volume (HPLV) applications shall be used.
Compliance with Rule
1113. Construction.
City of Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-9
CULTURAL RESOURCES
PPP CUL-1: Should human remains be discovered during Project construction, the
Project would be required to comply with State Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5, which states that no further disturbance may occur in the vicinity of the
body until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and
disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County
Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined
to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage
Commission, which will determine the identity of and notify a Most Likely
Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized
representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must
complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC.
Cease all ground
disturbing activity and
contact NAHC within 24
Hours per PRC 5097.98 if
remains are potentially
Native American. In the
case of an inadvertent
discovery of human
remains.
City of Rosemead
ENERGY
PPP E-1: California Energy Code Compliance. The Project is required to comply
with the 2019 California Energy Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code
(Chapter 12.24) to ensure efficient use of energy. California Energy Code
specifications are required to be incorporated into building plans as a condition
of building permit approval.
Compliance with 2019
California Energy Code
as included in the City’s
Municipal Code (Chapter
12.24).
City of Rosemead
GEOLOGY
PPP GEO-1: California Building Code. The Project is required to comply with
the California Building Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code Chapter
15.04 to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards.
California Building Code related and geologist and/or civil engineer
specifications for the Project are required to be incorporated into grading plans
and specifications as a condition of Project approval.
Comply with California
Building Code. Prior to
Grading Permit.
City of Rosemead
PPP WQ-1: SWPPP. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Project developer shall
have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a QSD
(Qualified SWPPP Developer) in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code
Chapter 13.16 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control and the Los
Angeles County RWQCB NPDES Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012- 0175.
The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs)
and other NPDES regulations to limit the potential of erosion and polluted runoff
during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure
Review and approval of
SWPPP. Prior to Grading
Permit.
City of Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-10
compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction
site by City of Rosemead staff or its designee to confirm compliance.
WATER QUALITY
PPP WQ-1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to grading permit
issuance, the Project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) in accordance with
the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 13.16 and the Los Angeles Regional Water
Quality Control Board National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 (MS4 Permit). The SWPPP shall
incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other NPDES
regulations to limit the potential of erosion and polluted runoff during construction
activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the
SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by the City of
Rosemead staff to confirm compliance.
Provide a SWPPP in
accordance with Municipal
Code Chapter. Prior to
Grading.
City of Rosemead
PPP WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to grading permit issuance,
the Project applicant shall have a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
approved by the City for implementation. The Project shall comply with the City’s
Municipal Chapter 13.16 and the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
(MS4) permit requirements in effect for the Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB) at the time of grading permit to control discharges of sediments
and other pollutants during operations of the Project.
Provide a WQMP in
accordance with Municipal
Code Chapter 13.16.
Prior to Grading.
City of Rosemead
NOISE
PPP NOI-1: Construction Hours. Per Municipal Code Chapter 8.36, construction
and demolition activities may only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and
8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Construction activities should not
take place at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. No person shall operate
or allow the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling,
repair, or alteration or demolition work outside of these hours to prevent noise
disturbances.
Compliance with
Municipal Code Chapter
8.36. Construction.
City of Rosemead
PPP NOI-2: Best Construction Practices. In addition to compliance with the City’s
Municipal Code allowed hours of construction of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday
through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays, the following
recommendations would reduce construction noise to the extent feasible:
City of Rosemead
Mission Villas Residential Project Chapter 4 MMRP
4-11
•The Project construction contractor should equip all construction
equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained
noise mufflers, consistent with manufacturer’s standards.
•The Project construction contractor should locate staging areas away
from off-site sensitive uses during the later phases of Project
development.
•The Project construction contractor should place all stationary
construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from
sensitive receptors nearest the Project site whenever feasible.
PUBLIC SERVICES
PPP PS-1: School Fees. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant
shall provide payment of the appropriate fees set forth by the applicable
school districts related to the funding of school facilities pursuant to Government
Code Section 65995 et seq.
Pay school fees per
Government Code Section
65995 et seq.
City of Rosemead
TRIBAL RESOURCES
PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural Resources. Cease all ground
disturbing activity and
contact NAHC within 24
Hours per PRC 5097.98 if
remains are potentially
Native American. In the
case of an inadvertent
discovery of human
remains.
City of Rosemead
UTILITIES
PPP UT-1: Solid Waste. As required by Municipal Code Chapter 8.32, Section
8.32.010 of the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, and AB 341
the Project shall implement a Waste Management Plan to ensure that the
construction and operational diversion requirements would be met.
Comply with CalGreen
standards. Prior to Final
Inspection.
City of Rosemead
Urban Planning ■ Due Diligence ■ Entitlements ■ CEQA/NEPA ■ Development Services ■ Management ■ Public Outreach
2355 Main Street, Suite 100 ■ Irvine, CA 92614
949.794.1180 ■ info@epdsolutions.com
This technical memorandum presents an analysis of the air quality, energy, and greenhouse gas (GHG)
impact for the proposed Mission Villas Residential Development (project), located on Mission Drive east of
Walnut Grove Avenue in the City of Rosemead. The project proposes the construction of 29 single family
homes and eight townhomes with common open space and landscaping on a 3.435-acre site. The site is
mostly vacant, with approximately 2,000 sf of concrete pavement on the south and west side of the project
site. To support the CEQA document for the proposed project, this report analyzes the proposed project’s
construction and operational impacts to air quality (emission of criterial pollutants) emissions using the
California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod v. 2022.1) land use emission model. Table 1 shows the
estimated construction schedule, which is expected to last about 11 months.
Table 1. Construction Schedule
Activity Start Date End Date Total Days
Demolition 3/1/2023 3/2/2023 2
Site Preparation 3/3/2023 3/8/2023 5
Grading 3/9/2023 3/17/2023 8
Building Construction 3/18/2023 12/11/2023 230
Paving 12/12/2023 1/1/2024 18
Architectural Coating 1/2/2024 1/22/2024 18
Summary of Air Quality, Energy and GHG Impacts
Air Quality:
The project’s maximum daily emissions (regional and local) for construction and operation of the project
would not exceed SCAQMD’s regional thresholds of significance. In addition, all construction activities would
comply with applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations, including Rule 403 to minimize fugitive PM dust
emissions, Rule 445 preventing woodfire stoves, and Rule 1113 which allows only Low-Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOC) paints. Projects that do not exceed the regional thresholds are assumed to not have a
significant impact on a project level and cumulative level. Therefore, the proposed project would have less
than significant air quality impacts.
Energy:
The project’s energy consumption for construction does not have any unusual characteristics and is not less
efficient compared with other similar construction sites. The operation of the project is also similar to other
residential projects and would comply with Title 24 as well as all applicable City business and energy codes
and ordinances.
To: City of Rosemead, Planning Division
From: Alex J. Garber
Date: 7/29/2022
Re: Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis for the Mission Villas
Residential Development
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
2
GHG:
Finally, the proposed project’s GHG emissions of 613 MTCO2e per year are below the existing operation
and the SCAQMD significance threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for residential projects. Therefore, the
project has a less then significant impact on GHG emissions.
Air Quality Impact Tables
Regional Emissions
The SCAQMD has adopted maximum daily emission thresholds1 (pounds/day) for the criteria pollutants
during construction and operation of a project. While incremental regional air quality impacts of an
individual project are generally very small and difficult to measure, SCAQMDs regional maximum emission
thresholds set standards to reduce the burden of SCAQMD to attain and maintain ambient air quality
standards. The regional thresholds apply to the criteria pollutants mentioned above and can be found in
Table 2 and Table 3 along with the CalEEMod projects emissions. These emission thresholds include the
project emissions generated both from onsite sources (such as off-road construction equipment and fugitive
dust) and offsite sources (vehicle travel leaving and arriving to the site). As can be seen in Table 2 and Table
3, the project would have less then significant regional air quality impacts.
Table 2. Regional Construction Emission Estimates
Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
2023
Demolition 2.9 28.3 24.9 0.0 1.7 1.2
Site Prep 4.0 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3
Grading 2.1 20.1 20.7 0.0 2.8 1.8
Building Construction 1.4 13.1 15.7 0.0 0.6 0.6
Paving 1.1 8.5 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4
Maximum Daily Emissions 4.0 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3
2024
Paving 1.1 8.2 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4
Architectural Coating 31.3 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Maximum Daily Emissions 31.3 8.2 10.5 0.0 0.4 0.4
Maximum Daily
Emission 2023-2024 31.3 39.7 35.5 0.1 6.9 4.3
SCAQMD Significance
Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Table 3. Regional Operational Emission Estimates
Operational Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Area 2.2 0.6 2.4 0.0 0.1 0.1
Energy 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1
Mobile 1.3 1.1 11.6 0.0 0.9 0.2
Total Project Operational
Emissions 3.5 2.4 14.2 0.0 1.0 0.3
SCAQMD Significance
Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Local Emissions
1 SCAQMD April 2019. Found at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-
significance-thresholds.pdf
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
3
Localized significance thresholds (LSTs) were also adopted by the SCAQMD due to project-related
construction or operational air emissions having the potential to exceed the state and national air quality
standards in the project vicinity, while not exceeding the regional emission significance thresholds adopted
by the SCAQMD. These thresholds set the maximum rates of daily construction or operational emissions from
a project site that would not exceed a national or State ambient air quality standard2. The differences
between regional thresholds and LSTs are as follows:
1. Regional thresholds include all sources of project construction and operational emissions generated
from onsite and offsite emission sources whereas the LSTs only consider the emissions generated from
onsite emission sources.
2. LSTs only apply to CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5, while regional thresholds include both ROG and SOx.
3. Regional Thresholds apply to emission sources located anywhere within the SCAQMD whereas the
LSTs are location dependent and also depend on the size of the project, and emission location
relative to the nearest sensitive receptor.
A sensitive receptor is defined as an individual who is most susceptible to negative health affects when
exposed to air pollutants including children, the elderly, and adults with chronic health issues. Such receptors
include residences, schools, elderly care centers, and hospitals. SCAQMD provides screening look up tables
(Appendix C of the SCAQMD 2008 Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology)3 for projects that
disturb less than or equal to 5 acres in size in a day. These tables were created to easily determine if the
daily emissions of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 from a project could result in a significant impact to the local
air quality. The thresholds are determined by:
• Source receptor area (SRA), the geographic area within the SCAQMD that can act as both a source
of emissions and a receptor of emission impacts (project is located within SRA 11, South San Gabriel
Valley),
• Size of the project,
• Distance to the nearest sensitive receptor.
The phase with the most ground disturbance would be the grading phase, which would grade 2.5 acres per
day. The thresholds for 2 acres from Appendix C were used for a conservative analysis. Distance to the
nearest sensitive receptor also determines the emission thresholds. The sensitive receptors closest to the project
include residential homes northwest of the project boundary, about 1.35 meters (4.43 feet) from the property
line. These receptors (distance from the project property line to the residential structure) are less than the
minimum distance provided in the lookup tables (25 meters). Therefore, 25 meters (82 feet) was used. Table
4 shows the thresholds and estimated maximum daily construction emissions for the proposed project. As seen
in Table 4, the proposed project has a less then significant localized construction air quality impact.
2 SCAQMD 2008: Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. Referenced on 9/3/2020 at
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst-
methodology-document.pdf
3 SCAQMD 2008: Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology Appendix C. Referenced on 9/16/2020 at
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/appendix-c-mass-
rate-lst-look-up-tables.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
4
Table 4. Localized Construction Emission Estimates
Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
2022
Demolition 27.3 23.5 1.7 1.2
Site Prep 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3
Grading 20.0 19.7 2.8 1.8
Building Construction 12.8 14.3 0.6 0.6
Paving 8.5 10.5 0.4 0.4
Maximum Daily Emissions 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3
2023
Paving 8.2 10.5 0.4 0.4
Architectural Coating 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0
Maximum Daily Emissions 8.2 10.5 0.4 0.4
Maximum Daily Emission 2023-2024 39.7 35.5 6.9 4.3
SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 121 1,031 7 5
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
According to the SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs apply to project stationary mobile sources. Projects that
involve mobile sources that spend long periods queuing and idling at a site, such as transfer facilities or
warehousing and distribution buildings, have the potential to exceed the operational localized significance
thresholds. The proposed project would operate 37 residential units, which do not involve vehicles idling or
queueing for long periods. Therefore, due to the lack of significant stationary source emissions, impacts
related to operational localized significance thresholds would be less than significant.
Energy
The State CEQA Guidelines do not have specific thresholds for Energy consumption. Rather, the question in
Appendix G: VI Energy (a) asks, “[Does the proposed project] Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project
construction or operation?”. Therefore, for the purpose of this analysis, a significant impact would occur if:
• The Project design and/or location encourages wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption
of energy, especially fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and petroleum, as well as the use of fuel
by vehicles anticipated to travel to and from the project.
The following assumptions were used to calculate the energy consumption of the proposed project:
• The project’s construction and operational energy consumption would be provided by Southern
California Edison Company.
• Construction equipment fuel consumption derived from ARB Offroad2021 emission model
• Fuel Consumption from vehicle travel derived from ARB EMFAC2021 emission model
• Electrical and natural gas usage derived from the CalEEMod model
Construction
Electricity and Natural Gas Usage:
Due to the project size and the fact that construction is temporary, the electricity used would be substantially
less than that required for project operation and would have a negligible contribution to the project’s overall
energy consumption. The electric power used would be for as-necessary lighting and electronic equipment
such as computers inside temporary construction trailers. Natural gas is not anticipated to be needed for
construction activities. Any consumption of natural gas would be minor and negligible in comparison to the
operation of the proposed project.
Petroleum Fuel Usage:
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
5
The construction equipment associated with construction activities (off-road/heavy duty vehicles) would rely
on diesel fuel as would vendor and haul trucks involved in delivering building materials and removing the
demolition debris from the project site. Construction workers would travel to and from the project site
throughout the duration of construction, and for a conservative analysis it is assumed that construction workers
would travel in gasoline-powered passenger vehicles.
Table 5 shows the total fuel consumption and horsepower-hour data contained within the ARB OffRoad2021
emission model for specific types of diesel construction equipment. It should be noted that the total fuel
consumption is a conservative analysis and would likely overstate the amount of fuel usage, as specific
construction equipment is not expected to operate during the duration of the construction activity (i.e., crane).
Table 6 summarizes the project’s construction vehicle fuel usage based on vehicle miles traveled and fuel
usage factors contained in the ARB EMFAC2021. The trips included are worker vehicles, vendor vehicles, and
haul vehicles. Table 7 shows the overall fuel consumption for construction of the proposed project.
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
6
Table 5. Construction Equipment Fuel Usage
Activity Equipment Number
Hours
per
day
Horse-
power
Load
Factor
Days of
Construction
Total
Horsepower-
hours
Fuel Rate
(gal/hp-hr)
Fuel Use
(gallons)
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 367 0.4 2 4,698 0.020615155 97
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 33 0.73 2 385 0.041912413 16
Excavators 3 8 36 0.38 2 657 0.019868435 13
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 367 0.4 5 17,616 0.020615155 363
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 84 0.37 5 4,973 0.019155948 95
Grading
Graders 1 8 148 0.41 8 3,884 0.021167864 82
Excavators 1 8 36 0.38 8 876 0.019868435 17
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 84 0.37 8 5,967 0.019155948 114
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 367 0.4 8 9,395 0.020615155 194
Model Building Construction
Cranes 1 8 367 0.29 230 195,831 0.014896922 2,917
Forklifts 3 8 82 0.2 230 90,528 0.010444038 945
Generator Sets 1 8 14 0.74 230 19,062 0.042356362 807
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 84 0.37 230 57,187 0.019155948 1,095
Welder 3 8 46 0.45 230 114,264 0.025848623 2,954
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 84 0.37 18 4,476 0.019155948 86
Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 8 10 0.56 18 1,613 0.019767572 32
Pavers 1 8 81 0.42 18 4,899 0.021536901 106
Paving Equipment 2 8 89 0.36 18 9,228 0.01846541 170
Rollers 2 8 36 0.38 18 3,940 0.019837453 78
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8 78 0.48 18 5,391 0.027606329 149
Total 10,233
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
7
Table 6. Estimated Project Vehicle Fuel Usage
Construction
Source Number VMT Fuel Rate Gallons of Diesel
Fuel
Gallons of
Gasoline Fuel
Haul Trucks 56 1,120 5.96 188 0
Vendor Trucks 4 9,384 8.87 1,058 0
Worker Vehicles 72 80,179 25.91 0 3,095
Total 1,246 3,095
Table 7. Total Construction Fuel Usage
Construction Source Gallons of Diesel Fuel Gallons of Gasoline Fuel
Construction Vehicles 1,246 3,095
Off-road Construction
Equipment 10,233 0
Total 11,479 3,095
Operation
The operation of the proposed project would consume electricity, natural gas, and petroleum. The net energy
consumption can be found in Table 8 below. Electricity and natural gas consumption were found in the Annual
CalEEMod Output Sheets attached. The gasoline consumption rates utilize the same assumptions that were
used for the worker vehicles.
Table 8. Annual Operational Energy Requirements
Operational Source Energy Usage
Electricity (Kilowatt-Hours)
Project 252,539
Natural Gas (Thousands British Thermal Units)
Project 1,242,170
Petroleum (gasoline) Consumption
Annual VMT Gallons of Gasoline Fuel
Project 1,127,736 43,533
Conclusion
The proposed project has no unusual characteristics that would make the construction fuel and energy
consumption associated with construction of the project less efficient compared with other similar construction
sites throughout the state. The consumption would also be temporary and localized. Operation of the 29
single family and eight townhome residential units would comply with all the energy efficiency requirements
under Title 24 and all applicable City business and energy codes ordinances. Therefore, the construction
and operation of the project would result in a less than significant impact for inefficient, wasteful, or
unnecessary energy use, and no mitigation would be required.
Greenhouse Gas
SCAQMD has convened a Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group
to help lead agencies determine significance thresholds for GHG emissions when SCAQMD is not the lead
agency. The last working group was held September 2010 (Meeting No. 15)4 and proposed a tiered
approach, equivalent to the existing consistency determination requirements in CEQA Guidelines Sections
15064(h)(3), 15125(d), or 15152(a). The most recent proposal issued in Meeting No. 15 uses a tiered
approach, Tier 1 to Tier 5, to evaluate potential GHG impacts from various uses. This assessment will apply
4 SCAQMD 2010. Minutes of the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15. Referenced
on 9/21/2020 at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-
significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
8
the Tier 3: Numerical Screening Thresholds approach. Tier three consists of screening values in metric tons of
carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) (converting other greenhouse gasses to an equivalent impact of CO2),
which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s
construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If
a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project impact would be
is less than significant:
• Option 1: All land use types: 3,000 MTCO2e per year
• Option 2: Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial: 1,400
MTCO2e per year; or mixed use: 3,000 MT CO2e per year
Executive Order S-3-05’s year 2050 goal is the basis of SCAQMD’ draft Tier 3 screening level thresholds.
The objective of the Executive Order is to contribute to capping worldwide CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm,
stabilizing global climate change. The City of Tustin utilizes Option 1, and therefore the threshold is 3,000
MTCO2e per year.
The project’s construction GHG emissions are shown in Table 9 and the overall construction and operational
emissions are shown in Table 10 These emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod Model. The construction
emissions are amortized over 30 years. As shown in Table 10, the net GHG emissions are 613 MTCO2e per
year, below the existing operation and the 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the project would have a
less than significant GHG impact.
Table 9. Project Construction GHG Emissions
Activity
Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e)
2023 369
2024 2
Total Emissions 371
Total Emissions Amortized
Over 30 Years 12
Table 10. Total GHG Emissions
Activity
Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e)
Project Operational Emissions
Mobile 412
Area 10
Energy 172
Water 4
Waste 3
Total Project Gross Operation
Emissions
601
Project Construction Emissions 12
Total Emissions 613
Significance Threshold 3,000
Threshold Exceeded? No
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
9
Figure 1: Project Site Plan
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
10
CalEEMod Output Sheets
Mission Villas Residential Development
Air Quality/Energy/GHG Summary
11
Fuel Calculations
GENERAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
FOR
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS
5389-009-029, -030, & -031
CITY OF ROSEMEAD,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
Borstein Enterprises, Inc.
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820
Los Angeles, California 90025
Prepared by:
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, California 92530
(909) 772-9009
JULY 2022
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | i
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ i
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Location ..................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Methodology..................................................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Literature Review .................................................................................................................. 1
2.2 Field Survey .......................................................................................................................... 1
3.0 Results .............................................................................................................................................. 2
3.1 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................ 2
3.2 Soils ........................................................................................................................................ 2
3.3 Habitat Communities.............................................................................................................. 2
3.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................. 3
3.5 Sensitive Biological Resources ............................................................................................. 3
3.5.1 Special Status Plants............................................................................................... 3
3.5.2 Sensitive Wildlife ....................................................................................................... 5
3.6 Critical Habitat ....................................................................................................................... 7
3.7 Migratory Nesting Birds......................................................................................................... 7
3.8 Wildlife Movement Corridors ................................................................................................ 7
3.9 Jurisdictional Waters .............................................................................................................. 7
4.0 Project Impacts................................................................................................................................ 7
4.1 Impacts to Habitat Types ........................................................................................................ 7
4.2 Impacts to Sensitive Species .................................................................................................. 8
4.3 Impacts to Migratory Nesting Birds ....................................................................................... 8
4.4 Impacts to Critical Habitat .................................................................................................... 8
4.5 Impacts to Wildlife Movement Corridors ............................................................................. 8
4.6 Conflict with Local Policies or Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources ...................... 8
4.7 Conflicts with the Provisions of an Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or Other Approved Local, Regional, or State Habitat Conservation Plan ........ 9
4.8 Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters ............................................................................................. 9
5.0 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 9
6.0 CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................................... 10
Fieldwork Performed By: ........................................................................................................................ 10
7.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 11
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | ii
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
FIGURES
Figure 1 – Location Map
Figure 2 – Vicinity Map
Figure 3 – Project Plans
Figure 4 – Habitat Map
Figure 5 – Impact Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Observed Species List
Appendix B – Potential Species List
Appendix C – Site Photographs
Appendix D – Soils Map
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 1
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
1.0 Introduction
Hernandez Environmental Services (HES) was contracted by Borstein Enterprises, Inc. to perform
a General Biological Assessment (GBA) on an approximate 3.44-acre project site within the City
of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The purpose of the GBA is to document the
presence/absence of sensitive resources that may be present on the site, to document existing
habitats, and generally address biological questions that may be needed for project approval. This
GBA will present the results obtained from the field survey and will provide recommendations that
may be needed to mitigate potential biological impacts from project activities.
1.1 Project Location
The project site is located at the northeast corner of Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue
within the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The site address is 8601 Mission
Drive, Rosemead, California. The site consists of Los Angeles County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers
(APNs) 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. Specifically, the project site is located within Section 18,
Township 1 South, Range 11 West of the El Monte United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-
minute topographic quadrangle. The project site center point latitude and longitude are
34°05’18.4499” North and 118°04’51.9358” West (Figures 1 and 2).
1.2 Project Description
The development plan is to construct 37 dwelling units comprised of 29 single-family detached
homes and eight duplex units. The community includes a private park with tot lot and other
amenities. The total area of impact is approximately 3.44 acres (Figure 3).
2.0 Methodology
2.1 Literature Review
HES conducted a literature review and reviewed aerial photographs and topographic maps of the
project location and surrounding areas. The following USGS quads were used to query the
California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB): El Monte, Pasadena, Mt. Wilson, Azusa,
Baldwin Park, Los Angeles, Southgate, Whittier, and La Habra. The United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) County Endangered Species Lists and CNPS Rare Plant Inventory were
reviewed to obtain species information for the project area.
2.2 Field Survey
On June 27, 2022, HES conducted a field survey of the 3.44-acre project site. Ambient temperature
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 2
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
at 9:25 A.M. was 77° Fahrenheit, sunny, with winds ranging from 0 to 1 mile per hour from the
southeast. The purpose of the field survey was to document the existing habitat conditions, obtain
plant and animal species information, view the surrounding uses, assess the potential for state and
federal waters, assess the potential for wildlife movement corridors, and assess for the presence of
critical habitat constituent elements.
The entire 3.44-acre project site was surveyed. Linear transects approximately 50 feet apart were
walked for 100 percent coverage. All species observed were recorded and Global Positioning
System (GPS) way points were taken to delineate specific habitat types, species locations, state or
federal waters, or any other information that would be useful for the assessment of the project site.
A comprehensive list of all plant and wildlife species that were detected during the field survey
within the project site is included in Appendix A. Sensitive plant and wildlife species with the
potential to occur within the project area are listed in Appendix B. Representative site photographs
were taken and are included within Appendix C.
3.0 Results
3.1 Environmental Setting
The project site, previously known as Guess Park, contains non-native, ruderal habitat with
portions of disturbed dirt trails and gravel. The project site is bordered by residential development
in all directions and busy roads to the south and west. The site is flat with elevations ranging from
351 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) to 360 feet AMSL.
3.2 Soils
According to the USDA Web Soil Survey, soil at the project site is classified as Urban land-
Palmview-Tujunga complex (1002), 0 to 5 percent slopes (Appendix D).
3.3 Habitat Communities
The entire 3.44-acre project area supports a ruderal habitat community dominated by non-native
plant species. This habitat type is common in previously disturbed areas. Characteristic species
within the project area include red brome (Bromus madritensis), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola),
redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium), telegraphweed (Heterotheca grandiflora), shortpod mustard
(Hirschfeldia incana), cheeseweed (Malva parviflora), tumbleweed (Salsola tragus), and
Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon). Several ornamental species from the surrounding single-
family residences were near the fence but within the project site, including cape leadwort
(Plumbago auriculata), creeping fig (Ficus pumila), oleander (Nerium oleander), California wild
grape (Vitis californica), Chinese elm (Ulmus parviflora), and Brazilian peppertree (Schinus
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 3
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
terebinthifolia).
3.4 Wildlife
General wildlife species documented on the project site or within the vicinity of the site include
the northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos),
California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto),
American kestrel (Falco sparverius), California towhee (Melozone crissalis), monarch butterfly
(Danaus plexippus), bumblebee (Bombus sp.), and checkered white butterfly (Pontia protodice).
3.5 Sensitive Biological Resources
A total of 45 sensitive species of plants and habitats and 45 sensitive species of animals has the
potential to occur on or within the vicinity of the project location. These include those species
listed or candidates for listing by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) and Bureau
of Land Management (BLM). All habitats utilized by these species was evaluated during the site
visit and a determination has been made for the presence or probability of presence in this report.
This section will address those species listed as Candidate, Rare, Threatened, or Endangered under
the state and federal endangered species laws or directed to be evaluated under other state, county,
or municipal regulations. All sensitive species within a 5-mile radius of project area were reviewed
and a complete list of those species are discussed in in Appendix B.
3.5.1 Special Status Plants
A total of 13 plant species are listed as state and/or federally Threatened, Endangered, Candidate,
Rare, or as 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. Other sensitive species that have a potential to
exist on the project site will also be discussed in this section. The following is a description of
these species:
Braunton’s milk-vetch
Braunton’s milk-vetch (Astragalus brauntonii) is a federally Endangered Species and ranked 1B.1
in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is found in recently burned or disturbed areas with
sandstone or carbonate layers. It is found in chaparral, coastal scrub, and valley-foothill grassland
habitats. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present.
Parish’s brittlescale
Parish’s brittlescale (Atriplex parishii) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This
species is usually found on drying alkali flats with fine soils. No suitable habitat is present in the
study area. This species is not present.
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 4
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Nevin’s barberry
Nevin’s barberry (Berberis nevinii) is a federally and state Endangered Species and is ranked 1B.1
in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species grows on steep, north-facing slopes or in low grade
sandy washes. It inhabits chaparral, cismontane woodlands, coastal scrub, or riparian scrub. No
suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present.
Lucky morning-glory
Lucky morning-glory (Calystegia felix) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This
species is found in meadows and seeps as well as riparian scrub. It prefers alkaline and alluvial
soils. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present.
Southern tarplant
Southern tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. australis) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant
Inventory. This species is often found in disturbed sites near the coast at marsh edges. It grows in
alkaline soils with saltgrass or on vernal pool margins. No suitable habitat is present in the study
area. This species is not present.
Smooth tarplant
Smooth tarplant (Centromadia pungens ssp. laevis) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant
Inventory. This species inhabits alkali meadows and scrub within valley and foothill grasslands,
chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, playas, and riparian woodland. No habitat for this species is
present on the project site. This species is not present.
Parry’s spineflower
Parry’s spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant
Inventory. This species is found on dry slopes and flats, sometimes at the interface of two
vegetation types, such as chaparral and oak woodland. It grows in dry, sandy soils that are not
found in the study area. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present.
Slender-horned spineflower
Slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras) is a federally and state Endangered Species
and is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species inhabits flood deposited terraces
and washes within chaparral, cismontane woodland, and alluvial fan sage scrub. No habitat for this
species is present on the project site. This species is not present.
San Gabriel Mountains dudleya
San Gabriel Mountains dudleya (Dudleya densiflora) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant
Inventory. This species grows in crevices and on decomposed granite on cliffs and canyon walls.
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 5
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
It inhabits chaparral, coastal scrub, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, and
riparian forest habitats. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not
present.
Mesa horkelia
Mesa horkelia (Horkelia cuneata var. puberula) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory.
This species inhabits chaparral, cismontane woodland, and coastal scrub habitats within sand or
gravel. No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present.
Coulter’s goldfields
Coulter’s goldfields (Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant
Inventory. This species is usually found on alkaline soils in playas, sinks, and grasslands. It
inhabits coastal salt marshes, playas, and vernal pools. No suitable habitat is present in the study
area. This species is not present.
California Orcutt grass
California Orcutt grass (Orcuttia californica) is a federally and state Endangered Species and
ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This species is found in vernal pools and wetlands.
No suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present.
Brand’s star phacelia
Brand’s star phacelia (Phacelia stellaris) is ranked 1B.1 in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory. This
species grows in open areas of coastal scrub and coastal dunes. No habitat for this species is present
on the project site. This species is not present.
3.5.2 Sensitive Wildlife
A total of 10 wildlife species are listed as state and/or federally Threatened, Endangered, Rare, or
Candidate Species. Sensitive species which have a potential to occur will also be discussed in this
section. Following is a description of these species:
Arroyo toad
Arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus) is a federally Endangered Species and a CDFW Species of
Special Concern. This species can be found in rivers with sandy banks, willows, cottonwoods, and
sycamores. It inhabits loose, gravelly areas of streams in drier parts of the range. This species
habitat includes semi-arid regions near washes or intermittent streams, including valley-foothills,
desert riparian, and desert washes. No suitable habitat is present. This species is not present.
Swainson’s hawk
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 6
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni) is a state Threatened Species. This avian species requires
adjacent suitable foraging areas such as grasslands, or alfalfa or grain fields supporting rodent
populations. No habitat for this species is present on the project site. This species is not present.
Bell’s sage sparrow
Bell’s sage sparrow (Artemisiospiza belli belli) is on the CDFW Watch List. This species lives in
chaparral and coastal scrub habitats and nests in chaparral dominated by dense stands of chamise.
Suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species has the potential to be present.
Santa Ana sucker
Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae) is a federally Threatened Species. It is a habitat
generalist but prefers sand-rubble-boulder bottoms and cool, clear water and algae. No suitable
habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present.
Southwestern willow flycatcher
Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) is a federally and state Endangered
Species. It is found in riparian woodland habitat in southern California. No suitable habitat is
present. This species is not present.
Coastal California gnatcatcher
Coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) is a federally Threatened
Species. This bird occupies low, coastal sage scrub in arid washes and on mesas and slopes. No
suitable habitat is present. This species is not present.
Foothill yellow-legged frog
Foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) is a state Endangered Species and a CDFW Species of
Special Concern. This species requires cobble-sized substrate for egg-laying and needs at least 15
weeks to attain metamorphosis. No suitable habitat is present. This species is not present.
Southern mountain yellow-legged frog
Southern mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) is a federally and state Endangered
Species and on the CDFW Watch List. This species is aquatic and tadpoles may require up to four
years to complete their aquatic development. No habitat for this species is present on the project
site. This species is not present.
Bank swallow
Bank swallow (Riparia riparia) is a state Threatened Species. This bird requires vertical banks and
cliffs with fine-textured soils near streams, lakes, rivers, and oceans to dig nesting holes. No
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 7
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
suitable habitat is present in the study area. This species is not present.
Least Bell’s vireo
Least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) is a federally and state Endangered Species. This species
is found in riparian forest, riparian scrub, and riparian woodland. Nesting habitat of this species is
restricted to willow and/or mulefat dominated riparian scrub along permanent or nearly permanent
streams. No suitable habitat is present. This species is not present.
3.6 Critical Habitat
The proposed project site is not located within any designated federal critical habitat. The closest
federal critical habitat is coastal California gnatcatcher critical habitat located 3.65 miles south of
the project site within the Whittier Narrows Natural Area and near the San Gabriel River.
3.7 Migratory Nesting Birds
Migratory non-game native bird species are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Additionally, Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code prohibit take
of all birds and their active nests. The study area has shrubs and trees near the borders that can be
used by nesting songbirds during the nesting bird season of February 1 to September 15.
3.8 Wildlife Movement Corridors
Wildlife movement corridors link together areas of suitable habitat that are otherwise separated by
rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbances. The project site was evaluated for
its function as a wildlife corridor that species would use to move between wildlife habitat zones.
Usually, mountain canyons or riparian corridors are used by wildlife as corridors. The project site
consists ruderal habitat with surrounding residential development and busy roads. In addition, no
jurisdictional waters exist on site. No wildlife movement corridors exist on the project site.
3.9 Jurisdictional Waters
No state or federal jurisdictional waters exist on the project site.
4.0 Project Impacts
4.1 Impacts to Habitat Types
The project site contains approximately 3.44 acres of ruderal habitat that is expected to be impacted
from project implementation (Figure 5).
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 8
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
4.2 Impacts to Sensitive Species
The project site is flat and ruderal with sparse non-native vegetation, including shortpod mustard
and brome grass. There is residential development, paved roads, and human activity in all
directions surrounding the site. Due to the nature of the project site and surrounding development,
no sensitive plant or wildlife species have the potential to occur. No impacts to sensitive species
are expected.
4.3 Impacts to Migratory Nesting Birds
Migratory nongame native bird species are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Additionally, Sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code prohibit take
of all birds and their active nests. If vegetation removal and other ground disturbance activities can
be conducted outside of the recognized nesting bird season (February 15 through September 15),
impacts to nesting birds is not expected.
If work cannot be avoided during the nesting bird season, prior to initiation of project activities
that would remove vegetation or otherwise disturb nesting activity (for instance, mobilization of
heavy equipment), work associated with project activities have the potential to impact nesting
birds.
4.4 Impacts to Critical Habitat
The proposed project site is not located within any designated federal critical habitat. No impacts
to critical habitat would occur from project development.
4.5 Impacts to Wildlife Movement Corridors
The project site is not located within a designated wildlife corridor or linkage. No wildlife corridors
or linkages were found to occur on site. No impacts to wildlife corridors or linkages would occur
from project development.
4.6 Conflict with Local Policies or Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources
The Los Angeles County Significant Ecological Areas (SEA) program identifies over 60 trees that
are protected, including oaks. A Protected Tree Permit is needed for removal of any of the
identified trees. The trees on site include tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), Mexican fan palm
(Washingtonia robusta), Brazilian peppertree, Chinese elm, and glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum).
None of these trees occur in the SEA protected tree list. Therefore, no conflict would occur.
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 9
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
4.7 Conflicts with the Provisions of an Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or Other Approved Local, Regional, or State Habitat
Conservation Plan
The proposed project does not conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved Habitat Conservation Plan.
4.8 Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
No state or federal jurisdictional waters exist within the project site. Therefore, no impacts to
jurisdictional waters would occur.
5.0 Recommendations
Based upon the findings of this report, it is recommended that the following measures be
implemented as part of the project to avoid, minimize, or compensate for the anticipated impacts
from project activities:
Nesting Birds
• If ground disturbing and vegetation clearing activities cannot be avoided during the nesting
bird season (February 15 through September 15), a qualified biologist should conduct a
pre-construction nesting bird survey within all areas of breeding/nesting habitat within and
adjacent to the project site prior to initiation of project activities that would remove
vegetation or otherwise disturb nesting activity (for instance, mobilization of heavy
equipment). Surveys should be conducted not more than 3 days prior to initiation of
activities.
• If nesting birds are encountered, a qualified biologist will establish an avoidance buffer
zone around the nest (buffer zones vary according to species involved and shall be
determined by the qualified biologist). No activities that would adversely affect the nest
shall occur within the buffer zone until the qualified biologist has determined the nest is no
longer active and the young are no longer dependent on the nest.
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 10
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
6.0 CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data
and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date 07/11/2022 Signed
PROJECT MANAGER
Fieldwork Performed By:
Sarah Vasquez
ASSOCIATE BIOLOGIST
Sarah Gulyas
ASSOCIATE BIOLOGIST
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 11
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
7.0 REFERENCES
American Ornithologists’ Union. 1983 (and supplements 1985, 1987, 1989, 1991, 1993, and
1995). The A.O.U. Check-List of North American Birds. 6th ed. Allen Press. Lawrence, Kansas.
Burt, W.H., and Grossenheider, R.P., 1980. Peterson Field Guides, Mammals. Houghton Mifflin
Company. New York, New York.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1988a. California’s wildlife, Volume I:
Amphibians and Reptiles. State of California Resources Agency. Sacramento, California.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1988b. California’s Wildlife, Volume II: Birds.
State of California’s Resource Agency. Sacramento, California.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1988c. California’s Wildlife, Volume III:
Mammals. State of California Resources Agency. Sacramento, California.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2014 (October). Natural Communities List.
The Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Game, Natural Diversity Data Base.
Sacramento, California.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2014 (October). Endangered and Threatened
Animals List. The Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Game, Natural
Diversity Data Base. Sacramento, California.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2014 (October). Endangered Threatened and
Rare Plants. The Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Game, Natural
Diversity Data Base. Sacramento, California.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2014 (October). Special Animals List . The
Resources Agency of California, Department of Fish and Game, Natural Diversity Data Base.
Sacramento, California.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2015. RareFind On-line program. Data Base
Record Search for Information on Threatened, Endangered, Rare, or Otherwise Sensitive Species
California Department of Fish and Game, State of California Resources Agency. Sacramento,
California.
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 12
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2018. CNDDB MGS Data. The Conservation
Strategy for the Mohave Ground Squirrel. The Resources Agency of California, Department of
Fish and Wildlife, Natural Diversity Data Base. Sacramento, California.
Department of the Army. 1986 (Nov 13). 33 CFR Parts 320 Through 330, Regulatory Programs
of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule. Federal Register 51(219):41206-41206.
Department of the Army. 2000 (Mar 9). 33 CFR Parts 320 Through 330, Regulatory Programs of
the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule. Federal Register 65(47):12818-12899.
Department of the Army. 2002 (Jan 15). 33 CFR Parts 320 Through 330, Regulatory Programs
of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule. Federal Register 67(10):20020-2095.
Hickman, J.C. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California
Press. Berkeley, California.
Holland, R.F. 1986 (updated 1996). Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural
Communities of California. Non-game Heritage Program. California Department of Fish and
Game. Sacramento, California.
Munz, P.A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. University of California Press. Berkeley,
California.
Sawyer, J.O. and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A Manual of California Vegetation. California Native
Plant Society. Sacramento, California.
Spencer, W.D., P. Beier, K. Penrod, K. Winters, C. Paulman, H. Rustigian-Romsos, J. Strittholt,
M. Parisi, and A. Pettler. 2010. California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project: A Strategy for
Conserving a Connected California. Prepared for California Department of Transportation,
California Department of Fish and Game, and Federal Highways Administration.
Stebbins, R.C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. 2nd ed. Houghton Mifflin
Company. Boston, Massachusetts.
Tibor, D.P. 2001. California Native Plant Society’s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of
California. California Native Plant Society. Special Publication, No. 1, 6th ed.
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
General Biological Assessment
P a g e | 13
Hernandez Environmental Services
17037 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Udvardy, M.D. 1994. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Birds. Alfred A.
Knopf, Inc. New York, New York.
USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2008. Draft revised recovery plan for the
Mojave population of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
California and Nevada Region, Sacramento, California. 209 pp.
USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1993 (Sep 30). Plant Taxa for Listing as
Endangered or Threatened Species; Notice of Review. Federal Register 50 CFR Part 17. U.S.
Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C.
USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1994 (Nov 15). Endangered or Threatened
Wildlife and Plants; Animal Candidate Review for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species.
Federal Register 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C.
USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1997c (Oct. 31). Endangered or Threatened
Wildlife and Plants. Federal Register 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Department of the Interior.
Washington, D.C.
FIGURE 1
Figure 1
Project Site Boundary
Legend N
Location Map
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California
FIGURE 2
Figure 2
Project Site Boundary
Legend N
Vicinity Map
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California
Project Location
FIGURE 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 MAIL9
10
11
12
13
20
21
22
23
24
25
14
15
16
17
18
19
38.29'
42.62'
26.17'
26.17'
32.67'32.67'
26.17'
26.17'
33.48'
26.17'
26.17'
32.67
'
32.67'
26.17
'
26.17'
38.35'76.50'86.00'76.62'86.14'S89°55'40"W 174.11'S00°56'10"E 542.70'N00°19'33"W 254.20'N28°55'42"E 389.37'S64°1
8
'
3
2
"
E
2
5
0
.
3
7
'S20°14'36"W 169.63'N89°08'21"E 86.93'20.014.08.00 15.0015.3017.2313.23
13.76
20.00
24.00
13.00
20.0014.018.00
20.0020.73
18.0010.0011.5030.009.018.09.018.0
8.00
20.00 5
TYP
5
TYP
19.15 6.020.0038.00
13.00
13.00
20.00
24.00
20.00
TYP
12.1
7
10.17
14.69
11.00 20.003TYP3TYP21.010.0
8.0
13.05
12.03
M
M
SBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19-52D SBE
PAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTS
SO CALIF EDISON CO
NO SITUS
APN: 5389-005-800
QUYEN Y TO
4629 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-042JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043MIKE B TO/TRITIA TO
4623 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-041
WILLIAM J STONECYPHER JR
4617 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-040
CARLOS VILLAGRAN/
KAREN VILLAGRAN
4613 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-039
FENGYI J SITU/TRACY F SITU
4607 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-038
NGO & BANH FAMILY TRUST
NGO ALEXANDER D TR
4603 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-037
JASON SAM/FRAUSTINA SAM
4549 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-036
LAIRD ANDERSON/
DONNA B ANDERSON
4545 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-035
BRYANT M TANG
4539 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-034
LENK TRUST
LENK JANET M TR
4535 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-033
KOKICHI NAKAZAWA/
SUMIE NAKAZAWA
4529 BARTLETT AVE
APN: 5389-009-032
S
A
N
D
Y
H
W
U
8
6
3
9
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
D
R
A
P
N
:
5
3
8
9
-
0
0
9
-
0
2
6
DE
H
O
N
G
86
3
7
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
D
R
AP
N
:
5
3
8
9
-
0
0
9
-
0
2
8
DUBOIS
F
A
M
I
L
Y
T
R
U
S
T
DUBOIS
W
A
Y
N
E
A
&
DOROT
H
Y
A
T
R
S
8635 M
I
S
S
I
O
N
D
R
APN: 53
8
9
-
0
0
9
-
0
2
7
MISS
I
O
N
D
R
I
V
EWALNUT GROVE AVE.BARTLETT AVE.4040803232886.016.0DU
5
DU
9
DU
7
DU
10
DU
11
DU
12
DU
13
DU
14
DU
15
DU
16
DU
17
DU
20
DU
21
DU
22
DU
23
DU
32
DU
33
DU
31
DU
34
DU
35
DU
24
DU
25
DU
26
DU
27
DU
28
DU
29
DU
30
DU
18
DU
19
DU
1
DU
2
DU
3
DU
6
DU
4
DU
8
DU
36
DU
37
L01
L02
L03
TYP
L05
L06
L07
TYP
L08
TYP
L04
TYP
C01
C02
C02
C02
L05
P01
TYP
W01
TYP
A0.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D ARCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
ST
ATEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
N
500 100 150
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN &PROJECT STATISTICS
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
SFD
PLAN 1
2,351 sf
SPANISH
COLONIAL
HACIENDA
SFD
PLAN 2
2,553 sf
"DUPLEX"
PLAN 1
1,546 sf
"DUPLEX"
PLAN 2
1,868 sf
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SUMMARY:
·OWNER / APPLICANT:BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC.
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
·CONTACT:ERIK PFAHLER
erik@borsteinenterprises.com
310.582.1991 x203
·APN:5389-009-029, 030, 031
·ZONING:
··CURRENT:R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
··PROPOSED:P-D
·GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
··EXISTING:LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
··PROPOSED:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
·PROJECT SIZE:
··GROSS SF:3.435 AC (149,929 SF)
··NET SF:3.378 AC (147,146 SF)
·LOT SIZE / F.A.R. / LOT COVERAGE:
··LOT 1 (DU 9-37) : 127,151 SF / 67.1% / 43.0%
··LOT 2 (DU 4):3,089 SF / 76.8% / 39.5%
··LOT 3 (DU 3):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%
··LOT 4 (DU 2):2,250 SF / 90.7% / 48.0%
··LOT 5 (DU 1):2,809 SF / 84.5% / 43.5%
··LOT 6 (DU 5):3,095 SF / 76.7% / 39.5%
··LOT 7 (DU 6):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%
··LOT 8 (DU 7):2,002 SF / 102.0% / 54.0%
··LOT 9 (DU 8):2,499 SF / 95.0% / 48.9%
·TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNITS:37 DU
··SFD PLAN 1:14 DU
··SFD PLAN 2:15 DU
··DUPLEX PLAN 1:4 DU
··DUPLEX PLAN 2:4 DU
·DENSITY:10.95 DU/AC
•OPEN SPACE AREA: 17,298 SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
·PARKING:
··GARAGE:74 SPACES
··GUEST:25 SPACES
··BICYCLE:2 SPACES
·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE VB
·OCCUPANCY:R-3 SFD/DUPLEX (CRC)
·PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:VARIES: MIN. 390 SF / DU ACHIEVED
·SCHOOL DISTRICT:ROSEMEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT
3907 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD #220
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
626.312.2900
·ELECTRICAL SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
P.O. BOX 6400
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729
800.655.4555
·GAS SERVICE:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
P.O. BOX C
MONTEREY PARK, CA 91756
800.427.2200
·WATER SERVICE:CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY
8657 GRAND AVENUE
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
626.614.2500
REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
SITE PLAN LEGEND
FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS
FIRE HYDRANT (3 PROPOSED)
BICYCLE RACK (2 SPACES)
CENTRAL COMMON OPEN SPACE
1,644 TOT. SF / 1.1% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
SURFACING: TURF
OTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE
15,654 TOT. SF / 10.6% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
SURFACING: COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING
TOTAL OPEN SPACE
17,298 TOT. SF / 11.8% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
REAR YARD AREAS
34,359 TOT. SF / 23.4% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
CITY PARKWAY LANDSCAPE
489 TOT. SF / 0.3 % WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
SURFACING: PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA
51,470 TOT. SF / 34.5% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
R.O.W. HARDSCAPE
1,383 TOT. SF / 0.9% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
SURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETE
DRIVE AISLE HARDSCAPE
30,810 TOT. SF / 20.9% OF PROJECT
SURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETE
HARDSCAPE (SIDEWALKS)
9,578 TOT. SF / 6.5% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
SURFACING: NATURAL COLORED CONCRETE
TOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA
40,388 TOT. SF / 27.1% WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
6ft HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM WALL w/ 4in
HIGH SPLIT-FACE CUM CAP
PARKING STALLS TO BE STRIPED PER
CITY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
17.112.111H
TRASH COLLECTION BIN LOCATION PER
REPUBLIC SERVICES WILL SERVE
LETTER
C01
C02
L01
L02
L03
L04
L05
L06
L07
L08
L09
P01
W01
DWELLING UNIT LEGEND
SPANISH
COLONIAL
HACIENDA
SANDY H WU
8639 MISSION DR
APN: 5389-009-026
DE HONG
8637 MISSION DR
APN: 5389-009-028
DUBOIS FAMILY TRUST
DUBOIS WAYNE A &
DOROTHY A TRS
8635 MISSION DR
APN: 5389-009-027
EQ
EQEQ EQ10'-0
"
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ90°130'
-
3
3
/
8
"
REQ
S
Y
S
T
B
K
:
1
3
.
0
'
10'-0
"
90°
9'-4 3/8"
REQ. SY
STBK: 9.36'EQEQEQ
EQ
10'-1 5/8"
REQ. SY
STBK: 10.14'EQEQEQEQ
90°
GAS
ELECM&P
TELE/CABLE
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR
26-80A23 60-50SL60-50SL
50-50SL
26-68
A24200
1234
67
5
121314151716
891011
30-80 SC
24-80
24-80
24-80
30-50SH
50-68 BIPASS50-50SL
26-80
26-6890-80FOLDING DR
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 26-80A23
60-50SL 60-50SL50-50SL
26-68
A24200
1
23
4
67
5
121314151716
89
1011
30-80 SC
24-80
24-80
24-80 30-50SH
50-68 BIPAS
S50-50SL
26-80
26-68
90-80FOLDING DR
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR34568791011121415 16 171312
30-50
SH30-50SH26-8026-80A2324-8024-8030-80 SC60-50SL
60-50SL50-50SL50-50SL26-68A24
20090-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH 40-50SL##-#########160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3456
87
9
10
1112
14
1516
17
13 12
30-50SH 30-50SH26-8026-80A23 24-80
24-80 30-80 SC60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50
SL
50-50SL2
6-68A24
200 90-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH
40-50SL##-#########GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE
160-70 SECT
.
G
AR
.
D
R
26-80
A23
60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50
SL
26-68 A24200
1234675
1213
1415
1716
891011
30-80 SC
24-8024-80 24-8030-50SH
50-68 BIPASS
50-50SL
26-80
26-68 90-80FOLD
I
NG
DR160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3 45 6 879 1011 12 1415 16171312
30-50SH26-8026-80A23
24-80 24-8030-80 SC 60-50SL60-50SL50-50 SL
50-50SL 26-68A2420090-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH40-50SL##-###########-##SL160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3
45
6
879
10111214151617131230-50SH26-80 26-80A23 24-8024-80
30-80 SC
60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50
SL50-50SL26
-68A2420090-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH40-50SL##-#####
#
#
#
#
##-##SL
GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE
160-70 SEC
T
.
GA
R
.
D
R
26-80
A23
60-50SL
60-50SL50-50SL
26-68A24
200
1234675
12
1314
15
17
16
891011 30-80 SC
24-8024-80
24-80
30-50SH
50-68 BIPASS50-50
SL
26-80
26-68 90-80FOLDIN
G
D
R
160-70 SE
C
T
.
G
A
R
.
D
R 3456879101112
14
1516
17
13
12
30-50SH
30-50SH
26-80 26-80A2324-8024-80 30-80 SC60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50SL50-50SL26-68A2420090-80FOLD
I
N
G
D
R24-8020-40SH40-50
SL##-#########GAS ELECM&P TELE/CABLE
160-70 SECT
.
G
AR
.
DR
26-80A23
60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50SL
26-68A24
200
1234675
1213
1415
1716
891011
30-80 SC 24-8024-80 24-80
30-50
SH
50-68 BIPASS
50-50SL
26-80
26-68
90-80FOLDI
NG
DR
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3
45
6
8
7
9
1011
12
1415
1617
13 1230-50SH26-8026-80A2324-80
24-80 30-80 SC60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50SL50-50SL26-68A24
200 90-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH
40-50SL##-###########-##SL
GAS ELECM&PTELE/CABLE
160-70 SEC
T
.
GA
R
.
D
R
26-80
A23
60-50SL
60-50SL50-50SL
26-68A24200
123467512
1314
15
17
16
891011 30-80 SC
24-8024-80
24-80
30-50SH
50-68 BIPASS
50-50
SL
26-80
26-68
90-80FOLD
I
NG
D
R
160-70 SECT
.
G
A
R.
DR
34
56
87
910
111214
1516
17
13
12
30-50SH
30-50SH
26-80 26-80A23
24-80
24-80
30-80 SC
60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50
SL
50-50SL26-68 A24200
90-80FOLD
IN
G
D
R
24-80
20-40SH 40-50SL
##-######
###GASELECM&P
TELE/CABLE160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80 A2360-50SL60-50SL 50-50SL26-68
A242001234675 12131415 1716
891011
30-80 SC
24-80 24-8024-80
30-50SH 50-68 BIP
AS
S 50-50SL26-8026-6890-80FOLDING DR160-70 SECT. GAR. DR3456 87 910 1112 14 1516 1713
1230-50SH26-80
26-80
A23
24-8024-80
30-80 SC60-50SL
60-50SL 50-50SL50-50SL26-68
A24 20090-80FOLDING DR
24-8020-40SH
40-50SL##-###########-##SL
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR34 5687910111214151617131230-50SH30-50SH26-80 26-80A2324-8024-8030-80 SC60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50SL50-50SL26-68A2420090-80FOLDING DR24-8020-40SH40-50SL##-#########GAS
ELECM&P
TELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80
A2360-50SL
60-50SL
50-50SL26-68
A24200
1234 67
5 12 13 1415
1716
891011
30-80 SC
24-8024-80
24-8030-50SH 50-68 BIPASS
50-50 SL26-8026-68
90-80FOLDING DR
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
160-70 SECT
.
G
A
R
.
D
R
26-80
A2360-50SL60-50SL50-50SL26-68A24
2001 23 4675
1213
1415
171689101130-80 SC24-80
24-80
24-8030-50SH50-68 BIPASS50-50SL26-80
26-68
90-80FOLDING DRGASELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80
A2360-50SL60-50SL
50-50SL26-68A2420012 34 6 751213141517168 910 1130-80 SC
24-80
24-8024-8030-50SH50-68 BIPASS50-50
SL 26-8026-68
90-80FOLDING DR160-70 SECT
.
G
AR
.
D
R
3456
8
7910
1112
14
1516
17
13
12
30-50SH30-50SH
26-8026-80A23
24-8024-8030-80 SC60-50SL60-50SL
50-50SL
50-50SL 26-68A24
200
90-80FOLD
I
N
G
D
R 24-8020-40SH40-50SL
##-#####
#
###
160-70 SEC
T
.
G
AR
.
D
R
3
45
6
8
7
9
1011
12
1415
1617
13
12
30-50SH26-8026-80A23
24-8024-8030-80 SC60-50SL60-50SL50-50
SL
50-50SL 26-68A24200
90-80FOLDIN
G
DR 24-8020-40SH
40-50SL
##-#######
####-##SLGASELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80A2360-50SL 60-50SL50-50
SL
26-68A24
20012 34 6 75
1213
1415
1716
8 910 11
30-80 SC24-80
24-8024-8030-50SH
50-68 BIPASS
50-50SL26-8026-68
90-80FOLDI
N
G
DR
160-70 SEC
T.
GA
R
.
DR
34
56
87
910
1112
14
1516
17
13
12
30-50 SH
30-50SH26-8026-80A23
24-80
24-80
30-80 SC
60-50SL
60-50SL50-50SL
50-50SL 26-68A24
200
90-80FOLD
I
NG
D
R
24-80
20-40SH40-50SL
##-#####
###
#
160-70 SECT. GAR. D
R
345687910111214151617
13
12
30-50SH
26-80
26-80A23 24-80
24-80
30-80 SC 60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50SL
50-50SL
26-68
A24200
90-80FOLDING D
R
24-80
20-40SH
40-50SL
##-#######
#
#
##-##SLGASELECM&P
TELE/CABLE
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR26-80
A2360-50SL
60-50SL
50-50SL26-68A2420012
346751213141517168
9101130-80 SC24-8024-8024-8030-50SH50-68 BIPASS
50-50SL26-8026-6890-80FOLDING DRGAS
ELECM&P
TELE/CABLE
160-70 SECT. G
A
R
.
D
R
26-80A23
60-50SL60-50SL50-50SL
26-68A24200
1234
67
5
121314151716
891011
30-80 SC24-80
24-80
24-80
30-50SH50-68 BIPASS
50-50SL 26-80
26-68
90-80FOLDIN
G
D
R 160-70 SECT. GAR. D
R
345 687 910 11 12 14 1516 17131230-50SH26-80
26-80A23
24-8024-80
30-80 SC
60-50SL60-50SL
50-50SL50-50SL26-68
A24 20090-80FOLDING DR24-80
20-40SH
40-50 SL##-###########-##SL160-70 SECT.
G
A
R
.
D
R
345687910111214151617
13
12 30-50SH30-50SH26-8026-80A23
24-8024-8030-80 SC
60-50SL60-50SL50-50SL
50-50SL
26-68A24
200
90-80FOLDIN
G
D
R
24-80 20-40SH40-50SL
##-######
#
#
#
GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLE 160-70 SECT. GAR. DR
1 234
6510111213151617
1426-80 A23
20060-80 SGD
60-50SL60-50SL 7 8910
24-8030-80 SC24-80 24-8020-40SH160-70 SECT
.
G
A
R
.
D
R
60-50SL891011
1314
12
1234
675
151617
24-80 26-80A23
200 80-80 SGD50-50SL
30-80 SC
40-50SL24-8024-80
160-70 SECT. GAR.
DR
60-50SL 891011 1314
12
1234
67515161724-8026-80
A2320080-80 SGD50-50SL 30-80 SC40-50SL24-8024-80GAS
ELECM&P
TELE/CABLE
160-70 SECT.
G
A
R
.
D
R
123465
10111213 151617
14 26-80A23
200 60-80 SGD60-50SL60-50SL
78910
24-80
30-80 SC
24-80
24-80
20-40SH
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 60-50SL
891011
1314
12
123
4
6
7
5
151617 24-80
26-80
A23
200
80-80 SGD
50-50SL
30-80 SC
40-50SL24-80
24-80GASELECM&PTELE/CABLE
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR123 4
65101112131516171426-80
A2320060-80 SGD
60-50SL
60-50SL7891024-8030-80 SC24-8024-8020-40SHGAS
ELECM&P
TELE/CABLE160-70 SECT. GAR
.
D
R
123465
10111213 151617
14
26-80A23
200 60-80 SGD60-50SL
60-50SL
78910
24-80
30-80 SC24-80
24-80
20-40SH
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR60-50SL
89101113
14121
234675
15161724-8026-80A2320080-80 SGD
50-50SL30-80 SC40-50SL24-80
24-80GAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABL
E
160-70 SECT. GAR. DR 26-80A23
60-50SL
60-50SL
50-50SL26-68A24200
1234
67
5
121314151716
891011
30-80 SC24
-8024-8024-80
30-50SH
50-68 BIPA
SS50-50SL
26-80 26-6890-80FOLDING DR
5
9
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
20 21 22 23
32
33
31
34
35
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
18
19
1
2
3
6
4
8
36
37
A0.1.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
PHASING MAP /SETBACK DETERMINATION
IRREGULAR LOT SETBACK DETERMINATION EXHIBIT
(SOUTHEAST CONTIGUOUS NEIGHBORING LOTS)
CONSTRUCTION PHASING MAP PHASE 2PHASE 1
GAS
ELECM&P TELE/CABLE53'-0"31'-0"
21'-0"7'-9"
31'-0"6'-8"53'-0"20'-112"26'-212"GREAT ROOM
30'-5" x 20'-6"
BEDROOM 4
11'-0" x 11'-0"
BA. 3
PANTRY
STORAGE
GARAGE
20'-5" x 20'-1"STORAGE/TRASH
2'-3"20'-112"20'-5"
2'-3"5'-2"15'-212"53'-0"31'-0"46'-612"6'-512"53'-0"4'-012"16'-1112"2'-3"
31'-0"
17'-1112"13'-012"4'-0"28'-712"7'-9"
BEDROOM 2
10'-0" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 3
10'-0" x 11'-0"
LOFT
11'-1" x 8'-8"
LAUNDRY
BA. 2
MBA
W.I.C.
MASTER
BEDROOM
17'-4" x 14'-6"MORNINGW.I.C.
TECH/LIBRARY
A1.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
FLOOR PLAN
40 8 12
AREA TABULATION
CONDITIONED SPACE (ELEV. A & B)
FIRST FLOOR:1026 SF
SECOND FLOOR:1,325 SF
TOTAL CONDITIONED:2,351 SF
UNCONDITIONED SPACE (ELEV. A & B)
GARAGE:489 SF
COVERED PORCH:9 SF
TOTAL UNCONDITIONED:498 SF
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 1 SFD
9'-1"9'-1"25'-3"100305410 200 210
215215111140
300
500
101
710 410
100 300 305210410500
200110
101
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:124:124:124:12
4:12
4:124:124:12
4:12
4:12
410500100210410101 100 210
410200
101
A1.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
SPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN
40 8 12
FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION
ROOF PLAN
PLAN 1 SFD
EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND
100: BUILDING COMPONENTS
CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE
WOOD FASCIA BOARD
ENTRY DOOR
METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR
BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE
200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM
STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS
STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM
300: PAINTED DETAILS
PAINTED SHUTTER
PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS
400: EXTERIOR WOOD
RAFTER TAIL
POT SHELF
OUTLOOKER / BRACKET
CORBEL
500: EXTERIOR METAL
POT SHELF
600: EXTERIOR VENEERS
ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER
700: MISCELLANEOUS
DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE
DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL
100
101
110
111
140
200
210
215
220
300
305
400
405
410
415
500
600
700
710
9'-1"9'-1"25'-3"100710 200 210
415210111140
300
405 600
400 101
220 410
100 300210
200600405415
400 101
110 10'-11"4:12
4:12 4:124:124:124:12
4:12
4:124:124:124:124:12
405100210410400101 100 210
410200
101
A1.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
HACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN
40 8 12
FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION
ROOF PLAN
PLAN 1 SFD
EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND
100: BUILDING COMPONENTS
CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE
WOOD FASCIA BOARD
ENTRY DOOR
METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR
BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE
200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM
STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS
STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM
300: PAINTED DETAILS
PAINTED SHUTTER
PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS
400: EXTERIOR WOOD
RAFTER TAIL
POT SHELF
OUTLOOKER / BRACKET
CORBEL
500: EXTERIOR METAL
POT SHELF
600: EXTERIOR VENEERS
ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER
700: MISCELLANEOUS
DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE
DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL
100
101
110
111
140
200
210
215
220
300
305
400
405
410
415
500
600
700
710
GREAT ROOM
30'-5" x 24'-10"
GAS
ELECM&P TELE/CABLE53'-0"31'-0"
BEDROOM 4
10'-0" x 12'-6"
BA. 3
PANTRY
STO. /
COATS
GARAGE
20'-1" x 20'-9"
20'-8"10'-4"
31'-0"50'-0"3'-0"53'-0"24'-1012"5'-6"19'-712"20'-912"20'-1"22'-1112"3'-0"
BEDROOM 2
12'-4" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 3
10'-0" x 12'-0"
LOFT
13'-10" x 12'-4"
LAUNDRY
BA. 2
MBA
W.I.C.
MASTER
BEDROOM
17'-2" x 14'-2"
LINEN
8'-0"45'-0"53'-0"31'-0"40'-812"12'-312"53'-0"7'-912"12'-1012"10'-4"
31'-0"
TECH
LINEN
A2.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
FLOOR PLAN
40 8 12
AREA TABULATION
CONDITIONED SPACE
FIRST FLOOR:1129 SF
SECOND FLOOR:1,424 SF
TOTAL CONDITIONED:2,553 SF
UNCONDITIONED SPACE
GARAGE:467 SF
COVERED PORCH:16 SF
TOTAL UNCONDITIONED:483 SF
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 2 SFD
9'-1"9'-1"27'-2"100305410 200 210
700215111140
300
500 410
101
710 410
100 300 305 210410500
200
500 101
110
4:12
4:12
4:124:124:124:12
4:124:12
4:12
410500100210410305101 100 210
410200
300101
A2.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
SPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN
40 8 12
FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION
ROOF PLAN
PLAN 2 SFD
EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND
100: BUILDING COMPONENTS
CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE
WOOD FASCIA BOARD
ENTRY DOOR
METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR
BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE
200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM
STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS
STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM
300: PAINTED DETAILS
PAINTED SHUTTER
PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS
400: EXTERIOR WOOD
RAFTER TAIL
POT SHELF
OUTLOOKER / BRACKET
CORBEL
500: EXTERIOR METAL
POT SHELF
600: EXTERIOR VENEERS
ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER
700: MISCELLANEOUS
DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE
DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL
100
101
110
111
140
200
210
215
220
300
305
400
405
410
415
500
600
700
710
9'-1"9'-1"27'-2"100 710 200 210
600210111140
300
405
400
710215
101
220 410
100 300210
200600
400 405 710 101
110
4:12
4:12
4:124:124:124:12
4:124:124:12
4:12
710 210410 400100
215
101 100 210
410200
400 300
101
A2.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
HACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& ROOF PLAN
40 8 12
FRONT ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION
ROOF PLAN
PLAN 2 SFD
EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND
100: BUILDING COMPONENTS
CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE
WOOD FASCIA BOARD
ENTRY DOOR
METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR
BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE
200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM
STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS
STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM
300: PAINTED DETAILS
PAINTED SHUTTER
PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS
400: EXTERIOR WOOD
RAFTER TAIL
POT SHELF
OUTLOOKER / BRACKET
CORBEL
500: EXTERIOR METAL
POT SHELF
600: EXTERIOR VENEERS
ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER
700: MISCELLANEOUS
DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE
DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL
100
101
110
111
140
200
210
215
220
300
305
400
405
410
415
500
600
700
710
GASELECM&PTELE/CABLEGAS
ELECM&PTELE/CABLEGREAT ROOM
20'-5" x 23'-3"
PDR
COATS
STORAGE
GARAGE
20'-5" x 20'-3"
PNTRY
GREAT ROOM
23'-5" x 25'-0"
PDR
GARAGE
21'-5" x 20'-3"
RECYCLE
PNTRY
TRASH
DROP
GREEN
45'-4"
1'-0"10"24'-0"4"21'-0"
13'-6"7'-6"1'-0"8'-1012"8'-11"17'-112"17'-1"53'-0"1'-0"2'-10"10'-7"10'-11"27'-8"53'-0"1'-0"21'-0"4"22'-0"2'-0"10"
45'-4"20'-312"21'-5"20'-5"20'-312"2'-8"
3'-0"
GREENTRASHRECYCLE
STORAGE
STORAGE
A3.1.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
BUILDING PLAN
40 8 12
AREA TABULATION
CONDITIONED SPACE
FIRST FLOOR:586 SF
SECOND FLOOR:960 SF
TOTAL CONDITIONED:1,546 SF
UNCONDITIONED SPACE
GARAGE:475 SF
COVERED PORCH:12 SF
TOTAL UNCONDITIONED:487 SF
FIRST FLOOR DUPLEX BUILDING PLAN
AREA TABULATION
CONDITIONED SPACE
FIRST FLOOR:716 SF
SECOND FLOOR:1,152 SF
TOTAL CONDITIONED:1,868 SF
UNCONDITIONED SPACE
GARAGE:488 SF
COVERED PORCH:17 SF
TOTAL UNCONDITIONED:505 SF
DUPLEX
PLAN 1 PLAN 2
BEDROOM 2
10'-0" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 3
10'-0" x 11'-0"
LOFT
11'-1" x 8'-1"
LAUNDRY
BA. 2
MBA
W.I.C.
MASTER
BEDROOM
14'-5" x 13'-0"LINENBEDROOM 2
10'-6" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 3
10'-7" x 11'-3"
LOFT / BR. 4
12'-8" x 11'-1"
LAUNDRY BA. 2
MBA
W.I.C.
MASTER
BEDROOM
12'-1" x 15'-7"LINEN45'-4"
24'-0"4"21'-0"
13'-6"7'-6"28'-8"1'-0"53'-0"1'-0"2'-10"45'-8"3'-6"53'-0"11'-112"4"10'-1012"2'-0"
45'-4"
11'-112"9'-1012"23'-4"BEDROOM 4
10'-1" x 11'-1"
A3.1.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
BUILDING PLAN
40 8 12
DUPLEX
SECOND FLOOR DUPLEX BUILDING PLAN
PLAN 1 PLAN 2
PLAN 2 BEDROOM 4 OPT.
140 140
9'-1"9'-1"27'-10"9'-1"9'-1"27'-10"100 410305 500300210
200 111 210 140 410
101
200 700
100 305 410300500210101
110
100 300500305410210 101
215 200200700
100305 410300500210
410110
101
A3.2.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
SPANISH COLONIALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
40 8 12
FRONT ELEVATION
DUPLEX
ENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 2)
REAR / MISSION DRIVE ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 1)
EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND
100: BUILDING COMPONENTS
CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE
WOOD FASCIA BOARD
ENTRY DOOR
METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR
BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE
200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM
STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS
STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM
300: PAINTED DETAILS
PAINTED SHUTTER
PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS
400: EXTERIOR WOOD
RAFTER TAIL
POT SHELF
OUTLOOKER / BRACKET
CORBEL
500: EXTERIOR METAL
POT SHELF
600: EXTERIOR VENEERS
ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER
700: MISCELLANEOUS
DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE
DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL
100
101
110
111
140
200
210
215
220
300
305
400
405
410
415
500
600
700
710
140 140
9'-1"9'-1"27'-10"9'-1"9'-1"27'-10"100 400 405300210
200 111 210 140 400
101
600 210200220
100 710300405210 101
600110 415
100 300405710210 101
415 200 600200220
100710 300 405210
110
400
210
101
A3.2.2VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
HACIENDAEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
40 8 12
FRONT ELEVATION
DUPLEX
ENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 2)
REAR / MISSION DRIVE ELEVATIONENTRY ELEVATION (PLAN 1)
EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND
100: BUILDING COMPONENTS
CONCRETE 'S' ROOF TILE
WOOD FASCIA BOARD
ENTRY DOOR
METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR
BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE
200: EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
EXTERIOR STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO o/ FOAM TRIM
STUCCO o/ FOAM CORBELS
STUCCO o/ SHAPED FOAM
300: PAINTED DETAILS
PAINTED SHUTTER
PAINTED FOAM FAUX GABLE END VENTS
400: EXTERIOR WOOD
RAFTER TAIL
POT SHELF
OUTLOOKER / BRACKET
CORBEL
500: EXTERIOR METAL
POT SHELF
600: EXTERIOR VENEERS
ADHERED MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER
700: MISCELLANEOUS
DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE
DECORATIVE PRECAST GABLE END DETAIL
100
101
110
111
140
200
210
215
220
300
305
400
405
410
415
500
600
700
710
4:124:124:12
4:12 4:124:124:124:12 4:12
4:124:124:12
4:124:124:124:12
4:12
4:124:124:124:12 4:12
1'-4"1'-4"1'-4"4:12
4:124:124:12
4:128:12A3.3.1VALENCIA CALIFORNIA 91354
949 939 1310
www.architeyk.com
A P P L I C A N T P R O J E C T DR AW INGS
DATE
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
A R C H I T E Y K
29222 DAKOTA DRIVE LICEN S E D A RCHIT
E
CT
C -3 1873
S
T
A
TEOF CA L I F O RNIAR
EN.10 -3 1 -2 3EVERITT KANG 8601-8623 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
BE-21-001
220516
11766 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 820LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
310.582.1991
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
ROOF PLANS
40 8 12
SPANISH COLONIAL ROOF PLAN
DUPLEX
HACIENDA ROOF PLAN
FIGURE 4
Figure 4
Project Site Boundary
Legend N
Habitat Map
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California Ruderal Habitat (3.44 Ac.)
FIGURE 5
Figure 5
Project Site Boundary
Legend N
Impact Map
APNs 5389-009-029, -030, & -031
City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California Ruderal Habitat (3.44 Ac.)
APPENDIX A
Observed Species List
Plant List
Scientific Name Common Name
Acmispon americanus Spanish clover
Ailanthus altissima Tree of heaven
Bromus madritensis Red brome
Chenopodium album White goosefoot
Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass
Erodium cicutarium Redstem filaree
Euphorbia maculate Spotted spurge
Ficus pumila Creeping fig
Heterotheca grandiflora Telegraphweed
Hirschfeldia incana Shortpod mustard
Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce
Ligustrum lucidum Glossy privet
Malva parviflora Cheeseweed
Nerium oleander Oleander
Plumbago auriculata Cape leadwort
Salsola tragus Tumbleweed
Schinus terebinthifolia Brazilian peppertree
Tribulus terrestris Puncture vine
Ulmus parvifolia Chinese elm
Vitis californica California wild grape
Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm
Wildlife List
Scientific Name Common Name
Aphelocoma californica California scrub jay
Bombus sp. Bumblebee
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow
Danaus plexippus Monarch butterfly
Falco sparverius American kestrel
Melozone crissalis California towhee
Mimus polyglottos Northern mockingbird
Pontia protodice Checkered white butterfly
Streptopelia decaocto Eurasian collared dove
APPENDIX B
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Arctostaphylos
glandulosa ssp.
gabrielensis
San Gabriel
manzanita Dicots None None 1B.2 Chaparral Chaparral.
Rocky
outcrops; can
be dominant
shrub where it
occurs. 960-
2015 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Astragalus
brauntonii
Braunton's
milk-vetch Dicots Endangered None 1B.1
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub |
Limestone |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Chaparral,
coastal scrub,
valley and
foothill
grassland.
Recent burns
or disturbed
areas; usually
on sandstone
with carbonate
layers. Soil
specialist;
requires
shallow soils
to defeat
pocket
gophers and
open areas,
preferably on
hilltops,
saddles or
bowls
between hills.
3-640 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Atriplex
parishii
Parish's
brittlescale Dicots None None 1B.1
Alkali playa |
Chenopod
scrub |
Meadow &
seep | Vernal
pool |
Wetland
Vernal pools,
chenopod
scrub, playas.
Usually on
drying alkali
flats with fine
soils. 4-1420
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Atriplex
serenana var.
davidsonii
Davidson's
saltscale Dicots None None 1B.2
Coastal bluff
scrub | Coastal
scrub
Coastal bluff
scrub, coastal
scrub.
Alkaline soil. 0-
480 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Berberis
nevinii
Nevin's
barberry Dicots Endangered Endangered 1B.1
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Riparian scrub
Chaparral,
cismontane
woodland,
coastal scrub,
riparian scrub.
On steep, N-
facing slopes
or in low grade
sandy washes.
90-1590 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
California
Walnut
Woodland
California
Walnut
Woodland
Woodland None None Cismontane
woodland Not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Calochortus
clavatus var.
gracilis
slender
mariposa-lily Monocots None None 1B.2
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Chaparral,
coastal scrub,
valley and
foothill
grassland.
Shaded foothill
canyons; often
on grassy
slopes within
other habitat.
210-1815 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Calochortus
plummerae
Plummer's
mariposa-lily Monocots None None 4.2
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest | Valley
& foothill
grassland
Coastal scrub,
chaparral,
valley and
foothill
grassland,
cismontane
woodland,
lower
montane
coniferous
forest.
Occurs on
rocky and
sandy sites,
usually of
granitic or
alluvial
material. Can
be very
common after
fire. 60-2500
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Calochortus
weedii var.
intermedius
intermediate
mariposa-lily Monocots None None 1B.2
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Coastal scrub,
chaparral,
valley and
foothill
grassland.
Dry, rocky
calcareous
slopes and
rock outcrops.
60-1575 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Calystegia felix lucky morning-
glory Dicots None None 1B.1
Meadow &
seep | Riparian
scrub
Meadows and
seeps, riparian
scrub.
Sometimes
alkaline,
alluvial. 9-205
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Canyon Live
Oak Ravine
Forest
Canyon Live
Oak Ravine
Forest
Riparian None None Riparian forest Not present.
Centromadia
parryi ssp.
australis
southern
tarplant Dicots None None 1B.1
Marsh &
swamp | Salt
marsh | Valley
& foothill
grassland |
Vernal pool |
Wetland
Marshes and
swamps
(margins),
valley and
foothill
grassland,
vernal pools.
Often in
disturbed sites
near the coast
at marsh
edges; also in
alkaline soils
sometimes
with saltgrass.
Sometimes on
vernal pool
margins. 0-975
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Centromadia
pungens ssp.
laevis
smooth
tarplant Dicots None None 1B.1
Alkali playa |
Chenopod
scrub |
Meadow &
seep | Riparian
woodland |
Valley &
foothill
grassland |
Wetland
Valley and
foothill
grassland,
chenopod
scrub,
meadows and
seeps, playas,
riparian
woodland.
Alkali
meadow, alkali
scrub; also in
disturbed
places. 5-1170
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Chorizanthe
parryi var.
parryi
Parry's
spineflower Dicots None None 1B.1
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Coastal scrub,
chaparral,
cismontane
woodland,
valley and
foothill
grassland.
Dry slopes and
flats;
sometimes at
interface of 2
vegetation
types, such as
chaparral and
oak woodland.
Dry, sandy
soils. 90-1220
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Cladium
californicum
California saw-
grass Monocots None None 2B.2
Alkali marsh |
Freshwater
marsh |
Meadow &
seep |
Wetland
Meadows and
seeps,
marshes and
swamps
(alkaline or
freshwater).
Freshwater or
alkaline moist
habitats. -40-
2150 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Cuscuta
obtusiflora
var. glandulosa
Peruvian
dodder Dicots None None 2B.2
Marsh &
swamp |
Wetland
Marshes and
swamps
(freshwater).
Freshwater
marsh. 15-280
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Dodecahema
leptoceras
slender-
horned
spineflower
Dicots Endangered Endangered 1B.1
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub
Chaparral,
cismontane
woodland,
coastal scrub
(alluvial fan
sage scrub).
Flood
deposited
terraces and
washes;
associates
include
Encelia, Dalea,
Lepidospartum
, etc. Sandy
soils. 200-765
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Dudleya
cymosa ssp.
crebrifolia
San Gabriel
River dudleya Dicots None None 1B.2 Chaparral Chaparral.
On granite
cliffs and
outcrops,
surrounded by
scrub. 365-
1250 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Dudleya
densiflora
San Gabriel
Mountains
dudleya
Dicots None None 1B.1
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest |
Riparian forest
Chaparral,
coastal scrub,
cismontane
woodland,
lower
montane
coniferous
forest, riparian
forest.
In crevices and
on
decomposed
granite on
cliffs and
canyon walls.
270-1100 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Dudleya
multicaulis
many-
stemmed
dudleya
Dicots None None 1B.2
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Chaparral,
coastal scrub,
valley and
foothill
grassland.
In heavy, often
clayey soils or
grassy slopes.
1-910 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Galium grande San Gabriel
bedstraw Dicots None None 1B.2
Broadleaved
upland forest |
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest
Cismontane
woodland,
chaparral,
broadleafed
upland forest,
lower
montane
coniferous
forest.
Open
chaparral and
low, open oak
forest; on
rocky slopes;
probably
undercollected
due to
inaccessible
habitat. 425-
1450 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Helianthus
nuttallii ssp.
parishii
Los Angeles
sunflower Dicots None None 1A
Freshwater
marsh | Marsh
& swamp |
Salt marsh |
Wetland
Marshes and
swamps
(coastal salt
and
freshwater).
35-1525 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Horkelia
cuneata var.
puberula
mesa horkelia Dicots None None 1B.1
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub
Chaparral,
cismontane
woodland,
coastal scrub.
Sandy or
gravelly sites.
15-1645 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Imperata
brevifolia
California
satintail Monocots None None 2B.1
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub |
Meadow &
seep |
Mojavean
desert scrub |
Riparian scrub
| Wetland
Coastal scrub,
chaparral,
riparian scrub,
mojavean
desert scrub,
meadows and
seeps (alkali),
riparian scrub.
Mesic sites,
alkali seeps,
riparian areas.
3-1495 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Lasthenia
glabrata ssp.
coulteri
Coulter's
goldfields Dicots None None 1B.1
Alkali playa |
Marsh &
swamp | Salt
marsh | Vernal
pool |
Wetland
Coastal salt
marshes,
playas, vernal
pools.
Usually found
on alkaline
soils in playas,
sinks, and
grasslands. 1-
1375 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Lepidium
virginicum var.
robinsonii
Robinson's
pepper-grass Dicots None None 4.3 Chaparral |
Coastal scrub
Chaparral,
coastal scrub.
Dry soils,
shrubland. 4-
1435 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Linanthus
concinnus
San Gabriel
linanthus Dicots None None 1B.2
Chaparral |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest | Upper
montane
coniferous
forest
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest, upper
montane
coniferous
forest,
chaparral.
Dry rocky
slopes, often
in Jeffrey
pine/canyon
oak forest.
1310-2560 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Muhlenbergia
californica
California
muhly Monocots None None 4.3
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest |
Meadow &
seep
Coastal scrub,
chaparral,
lower
montane
coniferous
forest,
meadows and
seeps.
Usually found
near streams
or seeps. 100-
2000 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Navarretia
prostrata
prostrate
vernal pool
navarretia
Dicots None None 1B.2
Coastal scrub |
Meadow &
seep | Valley
& foothill
grassland |
Vernal pool |
Wetland
Coastal scrub,
valley and
foothill
grassland,
vernal pools,
meadows and
seeps.
Alkaline soils
in grassland, or
in vernal
pools. Mesic,
alkaline sites.
3-1235 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Open
Engelmann
Oak Woodland
Open
Engelmann
Oak Woodland
Woodland None None Cismontane
woodland Not present.
Orcuttia
californica
California
Orcutt grass Monocots Endangered Endangered 1B.1 Vernal pool |
Wetland Vernal pools.10-660 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Orobanche
valida ssp.
valida
Rock Creek
broomrape Dicots None None 1B.2
Chaparral |
Pinon &
juniper
woodlands
Chaparral,
pinyon and
juniper
woodland.
On slopes of
loose
decomposed
granite;
parasitic on
various
chaparral
shrubs. 975-
1985 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Phacelia
stellaris
Brand's star
phacelia Dicots None None 1B.1 Coastal dunes
| Coastal scrub
Coastal scrub,
coastal dunes.
Open areas. 3-
370 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Pseudognapha
lium
leucocephalu
m
white rabbit-
tobacco Dicots None None 2B.2
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Riparian
woodland
Riparian
woodland,
cismontane
woodland,
coastal scrub,
chaparral.
Sandy, gravelly
sites. 35-515
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Ribes
divaricatum
var. parishii
Parish's
gooseberry Dicots None None 1A Riparian
woodland
Riparian
woodland.
Salix swales in
riparian
habitats. 65-
300 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Riversidian
Alluvial Fan
Sage Scrub
Riversidian
Alluvial Fan
Sage Scrub
Scrub None None Coastal scrub Not present.
Scutellaria
bolanderi ssp.
austromontan
a
southern
mountains
skullcap
Dicots None None 1B.2
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest
Chaparral,
cismontane
woodland,
lower
montane
coniferous
forest.
In gravelly soils
on
streambanks
or in mesic
sites in oak or
pine
woodland. 425-
2000 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Sidalcea
neomexicana
salt spring
checkerbloom Dicots None None 2B.2
Alkali playa |
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest |
Mojavean
desert scrub |
Wetland
Playas,
chaparral,
coastal scrub,
lower
montane
coniferous
forest,
Mojavean
desert scrub.
Alkali springs
and marshes. 3-
2380 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Southern
California
Arroyo
Chub/Santa
Ana Sucker
Stream
Southern
California
Arroyo
Chub/Santa
Ana Sucker
Stream
Inland Waters None None Not present.
Southern
Coast Live Oak
Riparian Forest
Southern
Coast Live Oak
Riparian Forest
Riparian None None Riparian forest Not present.
Southern
Sycamore
Alder Riparian
Woodland
Southern
Sycamore
Alder Riparian
Woodland
Riparian None None Riparian
woodland Not present.
Symphyotrichu
m defoliatum
San
Bernardino
aster
Dicots None None 1B.2
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest | Marsh
& swamp |
Meadow &
seep | Valley
& foothill
grassland
Meadows and
seeps,
cismontane
woodland,
coastal scrub,
lower
montane
coniferous
forest,
marshes and
swamps, valley
and foothill
grassland.
Vernally mesic
grassland or
near ditches,
streams and
springs;
disturbed
areas. 3-2045
m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Rare Plant
Rank Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Symphyotrichu
m greatae Greata's aster Dicots None None 1B.3
Broadleaved
upland forest |
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest |
Riparian
woodland
Chaparral,
cismontane
woodland,
broadleafed
upland forest,
lower
montane
coniferous
forest, riparian
woodland.
Mesic
canyons. 335-
2015 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Thelypteris
puberula var.
sonorensis
Sonoran
maiden fern Ferns None None 2B.2
Meadow &
seep |
Wetland
Meadows and
seeps.
Along streams,
seepage areas.
60-930 m.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Walnut Forest Walnut Forest Forest None None Broadleaved
upland forest Not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Accipiter
cooperii Cooper's hawk Birds None None
CDFW_WL-
Watch List |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Cismontane
woodland |
Riparian forest
| Riparian
woodland |
Upper
montane
coniferous
forest
Woodland,
chiefly of
open,
interrupted or
marginal type.
Nest sites
mainly in
riparian
growths of
deciduous
trees, as in
canyon
bottoms on
river flood-
plains; also,
live oaks.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Aimophila
ruficeps
canescens
southern
California
rufous-
crowned
sparrow
Birds None None CDFW_WL-
Watch List
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub
Resident in
Southern
California
coastal sage
scrub and
sparse mixed
chaparral.
Frequents
relatively
steep, often
rocky hillsides
with grass and
forb patches.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Ammodramus
savannarum
grasshopper
sparrow Birds None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Dense
grasslands on
rolling hills,
lowland plains,
in valleys and
on hillsides on
lower
mountain
slopes.
Favors native
grasslands
with a mix of
grasses, forbs
and scattered
shrubs.
Loosely
colonial when
nesting.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Anaxyrus
californicus arroyo toad Amphibians Endangered None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_EN-
Endangered
Desert wash |
Riparian scrub
| Riparian
woodland |
South coast
flowing waters
| South coast
standing
waters
Semi-arid
regions near
washes or
intermittent
streams,
including
valley-foothill
and desert
riparian,
desert wash,
etc.
Rivers with
sandy banks,
willows,
cottonwoods,
and
sycamores;
loose, gravelly
areas of
streams in
drier parts of
range.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Anniella
stebbinsi
Southern
California
legless lizard
Reptiles None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
USFS_S-
Sensitive
Broadleaved
upland forest |
Chaparral |
Coastal dunes
| Coastal scrub
Generally
south of the
Transverse
Range,
extending to
northwestern
Baja California.
Occurs in
sandy or loose
loamy soils
under sparse
vegetation.
Disjunct
populations in
the Tehachapi
and Piute
Mountains in
Kern County.
Variety of
habitats;
generally in
moist, loose
soil. They
prefer soils
with a high
moisture
content.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Antrozous
pallidus pallid bat Mammals None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
USFS_S-
Sensitive |
WBWG_H-
High Priority
Chaparral |
Coastal scrub |
Desert wash |
Great Basin
grassland |
Great Basin
scrub |
Mojavean
desert scrub |
Riparian
woodland |
Sonoran
desert scrub |
Upper
montane
coniferous
forest | Valley
& foothill
grassland
Deserts,
grasslands,
shrublands,
woodlands
and forests.
Most common
in open, dry
habitats with
rocky areas for
roosting.
Roosts must
protect bats
from high
temperatures.
Very sensitive
to disturbance
of roosting
sites.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Arizona
elegans
occidentalis
California
glossy snake Reptiles None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern
Patchily
distributed
from the
eastern
portion of San
Francisco Bay,
southern San
Joaquin Valley,
and the Coast,
Transverse,
and Peninsular
ranges, south
to Baja
California.
Generalist
reported from
a range of
scrub and
grassland
habitats, often
with loose or
sandy soils.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Aspidoscelis
tigris
stejnegeri
coastal
whiptail Reptiles None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern
Found in
deserts and
semi-arid
areas with
sparse
vegetation and
open areas.
Also found in
woodland and
riparian areas.
Ground may
be firm soil,
sandy, or
rocky.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Athene
cunicularia burrowing owl Birds None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
USFWS_BCC-
Birds of
Conservation
Concern
Coastal prairie
| Coastal scrub
| Great Basin
grassland |
Great Basin
scrub |
Mojavean
desert scrub |
Sonoran
desert scrub |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Open, dry
annual or
perennial
grasslands,
deserts, and
scrublands
characterized
by low-
growing
vegetation.
Subterranean
nester,
dependent
upon
burrowing
mammals,
most notably,
the California
ground
squirrel.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Bombus
crotchii
Crotch bumble
bee Insects None None
Coastal
California east
to the Sierra-
Cascade crest
and south into
Mexico.
Food plant
genera include
Antirrhinum,
Phacelia,
Clarkia,
Dendromecon,
Eschscholzia,
and
Eriogonum.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Buteo
swainsoni
Swainson's
hawk Birds None Threatened
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Great Basin
grassland |
Riparian forest
| Riparian
woodland |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Breeds in
grasslands
with scattered
trees, juniper-
sage flats,
riparian areas,
savannahs,
and
agricultural or
ranch lands
with groves or
lines of trees.
Requires
adjacent
suitable
foraging areas
such as
grasslands, or
alfalfa or grain
fields
supporting
rodent
populations.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Campylorhync
hus
brunneicapillu
s sandiegensis
coastal cactus
wren Birds None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
USFS_S-
Sensitive |
USFWS_BCC-
Birds of
Conservation
Concern
Coastal scrub
Southern
California
coastal sage
scrub.
Wrens require
tall opuntia
cactus for
nesting and
roosting.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Catostomus
santaanae
Santa Ana
sucker Fish Threatened None
AFS_TH-
Threatened |
IUCN_VU-
Vulnerable
Aquatic |
South coast
flowing waters
Endemic to Los
Angeles Basin
south coastal
streams.
Habitat
generalists,
but prefer
sand-rubble-
boulder
bottoms, cool,
clear water,
and algae.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Coccyzus
americanus
occidentalis
western
yellow-billed
cuckoo
Birds Threatened Endangered
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
NABCI_RWL-
Red Watch List
| USFS_S-
Sensitive
Riparian forest
Riparian forest
nester, along
the broad,
lower flood-
bottoms of
larger river
systems.
Nests in
riparian
jungles of
willow, often
mixed with
cottonwoods,
with lower
story of
blackberry,
nettles, or wild
grape.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Corynorhinus
townsendii
Townsend's
big-eared bat Mammals None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
USFS_S-
Sensitive |
WBWG_H-
High Priority
Broadleaved
upland forest |
Chaparral |
Chenopod
scrub | Great
Basin
grassland |
Great Basin
scrub | Joshua
tree woodland
| Lower
montane
coniferous
forest |
Meadow &
seep |
Mojavean
desert scrub |
Riparian forest
| Riparian
woodland |
Sonoran
desert scrub |
Sonoran thorn
woodland |
Upper
montane
coniferous
Throughout
California in a
wide variety of
habitats. Most
common in
mesic sites.
Roosts in the
open, hanging
from walls and
ceilings.
Roosting sites
limiting.
Extremely
sensitive to
human
disturbance.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Cypseloides
niger black swift Birds None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
NABCI_YWL-
Yellow Watch
List |
USFWS_BCC-
Birds of
Conservation
Concern
Coastal belt of
Santa Cruz and
Monterey
counties;
central and
southern
Sierra Nevada;
San
Bernardino
and San
Jacinto
mountains.
Breeds in small
colonies on
cliffs behind or
adjacent to
waterfalls in
deep canyons
and sea-bluffs
above the surf;
forages widely.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Empidonax
traillii extimus
southwestern
willow
flycatcher
Birds Endangered Endangered NABCI_RWL-
Red Watch List
Riparian
woodland
Riparian
woodlands in
Southern
California.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Emys
marmorata
western pond
turtle Reptiles None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_VU-
Vulnerable |
USFS_S-
Sensitive
Aquatic |
Artificial
flowing waters
|
Klamath/North
coast flowing
waters |
Klamath/North
coast standing
waters |
Marsh &
swamp |
Sacramento/S
an Joaquin
flowing waters
|
Sacramento/S
an Joaquin
standing
waters | South
coast flowing
waters | South
coast standing
waters |
Wetland
A thoroughly
aquatic turtle
of ponds,
marshes,
rivers, streams
and irrigation
ditches,
usually with
aquatic
vegetation,
below 6000 ft
elevation.
Needs basking
sites and
suitable (sandy
banks or
grassy open
fields) upland
habitat up to
0.5 km from
water for egg-
laying.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Eumops
perotis
californicus
western
mastiff bat Mammals None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
WBWG_H-
High Priority
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Many open,
semi-arid to
arid habitats,
including
conifer and
deciduous
woodlands,
coastal scrub,
grasslands,
chaparral, etc.
Roosts in
crevices in cliff
faces, high
buildings,
trees and
tunnels.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Falco
peregrinus
anatum
American
peregrine
falcon
Birds Delisted Delisted
CDF_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_FP-Fully
Protected
Near wetlands,
lakes, rivers, or
other water;
on cliffs,
banks, dunes,
mounds; also,
human-made
structures.
Nest consists
of a scrape or
a depression
or ledge in an
open site.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Gila orcuttii arroyo chub Fish None None
AFS_VU-
Vulnerable |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
USFS_S-
Sensitive
Aquatic |
South coast
flowing waters
Native to
streams from
Malibu Creek
to San Luis Rey
River basin.
Introduced
into streams in
Santa Clara,
Ventura, Santa
Ynez, Mojave
and San Diego
river basins.
Slow water
stream
sections with
mud or sand
bottoms.
Feeds heavily
on aquatic
vegetation and
associated
invertebrates.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Glyptostoma
gabrielense
San Gabriel
chestnut Mollusks None None Terrestrial.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Gonidea
angulata
western ridged
mussel Mollusks None None Aquatic
Primarily
creeks and
rivers and less
often lakes.
Originally in
most of state,
now
extirpated
from Central
and Southern
California.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Icteria virens yellow-
breasted chat Birds None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Riparian forest
| Riparian
scrub |
Riparian
woodland
Summer
resident;
inhabits
riparian
thickets of
willow and
other brushy
tangles near
watercourses.
Nests in low,
dense riparian,
consisting of
willow,
blackberry,
wild grape;
forages and
nests within 10
ft of ground.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Lasionycteris
noctivagans
silver-haired
bat Mammals None None
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
WBWG_M-
Medium
Priority
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest |
Oldgrowth |
Riparian forest
Primarily a
coastal and
montane
forest dweller,
feeding over
streams,
ponds and
open brushy
areas.
Roosts in
hollow trees,
beneath
exfoliating
bark,
abandoned
woodpecker
holes, and
rarely under
rocks. Needs
drinking water.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Lasiurus
blossevillii
western red
bat Mammals None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
WBWG_H-
High Priority
Cismontane
woodland |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest |
Riparian forest
| Riparian
woodland
Roosts
primarily in
trees, 2-40 ft
above ground,
from sea level
up through
mixed conifer
forests.
Prefers habitat
edges and
mosaics with
trees that are
protected
from above
and open
below with
open areas for
foraging.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Lasiurus
cinereus hoary bat Mammals None None
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
WBWG_M-
Medium
Priority
Broadleaved
upland forest |
Cismontane
woodland |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest | North
coast
coniferous
forest
Prefers open
habitats or
habitat
mosaics, with
access to trees
for cover and
open areas or
habitat edges
for feeding.
Roosts in
dense foliage
of medium to
large trees.
Feeds
primarily on
moths.
Requires
water.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Lasiurus
xanthinus
western
yellow bat Mammals None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
WBWG_H-
High Priority
Desert wash
Found in valley
foothill
riparian,
desert
riparian,
desert wash,
and palm oasis
habitats.
Roosts in
trees,
particularly
palms. Forages
over water
and among
trees.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Lepus
californicus
bennettii
San Diego
black-tailed
jackrabbit
Mammals None None Coastal scrub
Intermediate
canopy stages
of shrub
habitats and
open shrub /
herbaceous
and tree /
herbaceous
edges.
Coastal sage
scrub habitats
in Southern
California.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Nyctinomops
femorosaccus
pocketed free-
tailed bat Mammals None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
WBWG_M-
Medium
Priority
Joshua tree
woodland |
Pinon &
juniper
woodlands |
Riparian scrub
| Sonoran
desert scrub
Variety of arid
areas in
Southern
California; pine-
juniper
woodlands,
desert scrub,
palm oasis,
desert wash,
desert
riparian, etc.
Rocky areas
with high cliffs.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Nyctinomops
macrotis
big free-tailed
bat Mammals None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
WBWG_MH-
Medium-High
Priority
Low-lying arid
areas in
Southern
California.
Need high
cliffs or rocky
outcrops for
roosting sites.
Feeds
principally on
large moths.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Onychomys
torridus
ramona
southern
grasshopper
mouse
Mammals None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern
Chenopod
scrub
Desert areas,
especially
scrub habitats
with friable
soils for
digging.
Prefers low to
moderate
shrub cover.
Feeds almost
exclusively on
arthropods,
especially
scorpions and
orthopteran
insects.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Ovis
canadensis
nelsoni
desert bighorn
sheep Mammals None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_FP-Fully
Protected |
USFS_S-
Sensitive
Alpine | Alpine
dwarf scrub |
Chaparral |
Chenopod
scrub | Great
Basin scrub |
Mojavean
desert scrub |
Montane
dwarf scrub |
Pinon &
juniper
woodlands |
Riparian
woodland |
Sonoran
desert scrub
Widely
distributed
from the
White Mtns in
Mono Co. to
the Chocolate
Mts in Imperial
Co.
Open, rocky,
steep areas
with available
water and
herbaceous
forage.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Palaeoxenus
dohrni
Dohrn's
elegant
eucnemid
beetle
Insects None None
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Phrynosoma
blainvillii
coast horned
lizard Reptiles None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal bluff
scrub | Coastal
scrub | Desert
wash | Pinon
& juniper
woodlands |
Riparian scrub
| Riparian
woodland |
Valley &
foothill
grassland
Frequents a
wide variety of
habitats, most
common in
lowlands along
sandy washes
with scattered
low bushes.
Open areas for
sunning,
bushes for
cover, patches
of loose soil
for burial, and
abundant
supply of ants
and other
insects.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Polioptila
californica
californica
coastal
California
gnatcatcher
Birds Threatened None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
NABCI_YWL-
Yellow Watch
List
Coastal bluff
scrub | Coastal
scrub
Obligate,
permanent
resident of
coastal sage
scrub below
2500 ft in
Southern
California.
Low, coastal
sage scrub in
arid washes,
on mesas and
slopes. Not all
areas classified
as coastal sage
scrub are
occupied.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Rana boylii foothill yellow-
legged frog Amphibians None Endangered
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened |
USFS_S-
Sensitive
Aquatic |
Chaparral |
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Klamath/North
coast flowing
waters |
Lower
montane
coniferous
forest |
Meadow &
seep | Riparian
forest |
Riparian
woodland |
Sacramento/S
an Joaquin
flowing waters
Partly-shaded,
shallow
streams and
riffles with a
rocky
substrate in a
variety of
habitats.
Needs at least
some cobble-
sized substrate
for egg-laying.
Needs at least
15 weeks to
attain
metamorphosi
s.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Rana muscosa
southern
mountain
yellow-legged
frog
Amphibians Endangered Endangered
CDFW_WL-
Watch List |
IUCN_EN-
Endangered |
USFS_S-
Sensitive
Aquatic
Disjunct
populations
known from
southern
Sierras
(northern DPS)
and San
Gabriel, San
Bernardino,
and San
Jacinto Mtns
(southern
DPS). Found at
1,000 to
12,000 ft in
lakes and
creeks that
stem from
springs and
snowmelt.
May
overwinter
under frozen
lakes.
Often
encountered
within a few
feet of water.
Tadpoles may
require 2 - 4
yrs to
complete their
aquatic
development.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Rhinichthys
osculus ssp. 8
Santa Ana
speckled dace Fish None None
AFS_TH-
Threatened |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
USFS_S-
Sensitive
Aquatic |
South coast
flowing waters
Headwaters of
the Santa Ana
and San
Gabriel rivers.
May be
extirpated
from the Los
Angeles River
system.
Requires
permanent
flowing
streams with
summer water
temps of 17-
20 C. Usually
inhabits
shallow cobble
and gravel
riffles.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Riparia riparia bank swallow Birds None Threatened
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Riparian scrub
| Riparian
woodland
Colonial
nester; nests
primarily in
riparian and
other lowland
habitats west
of the desert.
Requires
vertical
banks/cliffs
with fine-
textured/sand
y soils near
streams,
rivers, lakes,
ocean to dig
nesting hole.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Spea
hammondii
western
spadefoot Amphibians None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
Cismontane
woodland |
Coastal scrub |
Valley &
foothill
grassland |
Vernal pool |
Wetland
Occurs
primarily in
grassland
habitats, but
can be found
in valley-
foothill
hardwood
woodlands.
Vernal pools
are essential
for breeding
and egg-laying.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Taricha torosa Coast Range
newt Amphibians None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern
Coastal
drainages from
Mendocino
County to San
Diego County.
Lives in
terrestrial
habitats and
will migrate
over 1 km to
breed in
ponds,
reservoirs and
slow moving
streams.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Taxidea taxus American
badger Mammals None None
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Alkali marsh |
Alkali playa |
Alpine | Alpine
dwarf scrub |
Bog & fen |
Brackish marsh
| Broadleaved
upland forest |
Chaparral |
Chenopod
scrub |
Cismontane
woodland |
Closed-cone
coniferous
forest |
Coastal bluff
scrub | Coastal
dunes |
Coastal prairie
| Coastal scrub
| Desert dunes
| Desert wash
| Freshwater
marsh | Great
Basin
grassland |
Great Basin
Most
abundant in
drier open
stages of most
shrub, forest,
and
herbaceous
habitats, with
friable soils.
Needs
sufficient food,
friable soils
and open,
uncultivated
ground. Preys
on burrowing
rodents. Digs
burrows.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Scientific
Name
Common
Name Taxon Group Federal List State List Other Status Habitats General
Habitat Micro Habitat Presence/
Absence
Thamnophis
hammondii
two-striped
gartersnake Reptiles None None
BLM_S-
Sensitive |
CDFW_SSC-
Species of
Special
Concern |
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern |
USFS_S-
Sensitive
Marsh &
swamp |
Riparian scrub
| Riparian
woodland |
Wetland
Coastal
California from
vicinity of
Salinas to
northwest Baja
California.
From sea to
about 7,000 ft
elevation.
Highly aquatic,
found in or
near
permanent
fresh water.
Often along
streams with
rocky beds and
riparian
growth.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
Vireo bellii
pusillus
least Bell's
vireo Birds Endangered Endangered
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened |
NABCI_YWL-
Yellow Watch
List
Riparian forest
| Riparian
scrub |
Riparian
woodland
Summer
resident of
Southern
California in
low riparian in
vicinity of
water or in dry
river bottoms;
below 2000 ft.
Nests placed
along margins
of bushes or
on twigs
projecting into
pathways,
usually willow,
Baccharis,
mesquite.
No habitat for
this species is
present on the
project site.
This species is
not present.
APPENDIX C
Ruderal habitat on the project site. Disturbed
areas of rocks and pavement. Facing north.
Ruderal habitat on the project site. Appears
to be previously disturbed. Sparse vegetation
present.
Ruderal habitat on the project site. Single-
family residence adjacent but offsite. Facing
northwest.
Ruderal habitat on the project site. Facing
west. Power lines offsite.
Ruderal habitat on the project site. Facing
south. Mission Drive exists south of the site.
Ruderal habitat on the project site. Appears
to be previously disturbed. Sparse vegetation
present. Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia
robusta) in the distance.
APPENDIX D
Soil Map—Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part
(Property Line)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/27/2022
Page 1 of 3377238037724103772440377247037725003772530377256037725903772620377238037724103772440377247037725003772530377256037725903772620400150400180400210400240400270400300400330
400150 400180 400210 400240 400270 400300 400330
34° 5' 22'' N 118° 4' 56'' W34° 5' 22'' N118° 4' 48'' W34° 5' 14'' N
118° 4' 56'' W34° 5' 14'' N
118° 4' 48'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 15 30 60 90
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,260 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern
Part
Survey Area Data: Version 8, Sep 13, 2021
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Dec 5, 2020—Feb 6,
2021
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part
(Property Line)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/27/2022
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
1002 Urban land-Palmview-Tujunga
complex, 0 to 5 percent
slopes
3.4 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 3.4 100.0%
Soil Map—Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part Property Line
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/27/2022
Page 3 of 3
CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE
8601 MISSION DRIVE PROJECT
CITY OF ROSEMEAD,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APNs 5389-009-29, -30, and -31
Lead Agency:
City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770
Preparer:
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064 ___________________ Signature
Project Proponent:
Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025
May 13, 2022
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
i
Archaeological Database Information
Authors: Brian F. Smith, M.A. and Elena C. Goralogia, B.A.
Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064
(858) 679-8218
Client/Project Proponent: City of Rosemead
8838 East Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
Report Date: May 13, 2022
Report Title: Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project,
City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California (APNs 5389-
009-29, -30, and -31)
Type of Study: Phase I Cultural Resources Study
USGS Quadrangle: Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 11 West of the El Monte,
California (7.5-minute)
Acreage: 3.38 acres
Key Words: Archaeological study; P-19-190503 relocated; no impacts to
recorded cultural resources; monitoring recommended.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ii
Table of Contents
Section Description Page
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT ........................................................................ iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1.0–1
1.1 Project Description............................................................................................1.0–1
1.2 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................1.0–1
1.3 Cultural Setting .................................................................................................1.0–1
1.3.1 Prehistoric Period ....................................................................................1.0–1
1.3.2 Ethnohistoric Period ................................................................................1.0–9
1.4 Results of the Archaeological Records Search .................................................1.0–12
1.5 Applicable Regulations .....................................................................................1.0–14
1.5.1 California Environmental Quality Act .....................................................1.0–14
2.0 RESEARCH DESIGN .............................................................................................2.0–1
3.0 FIELD SURVEY .....................................................................................................3.0–1
3.1 Survey Methods ................................................................................................3.0–1
3.2 Results ...............................................................................................................3.0–1
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................................4.0–1
4.1 Construction Monitoring Program ....................................................................4.0–1
5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED .......................5.0–1
6.0 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................6.0–1
List of Appendices
Appendix A – Resumes of Key Personnel
Appendix B – Archaeological Records Search Results*
Appendix C – NAHC Sacred Lands File Search Results*
*Deleted for public review and bound separately in the Confidential Appendix
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii
List of Figures
Figure Description Page
Figure 1.1–1 General Location Map ...................................................................................1.0–2
Figure 1.1–2 Project Location Map (USGS) ......................................................................1.0–3
Figure 1.1–3 Conceptual Site Plan......................................................................................1.0–4
List of Plates
Plate Description Page
Plate 3.2–1 Overview of the project, facing northwest ...................................................3.0–2
Plate 3.2–2 View of the driveway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-
Day Saints building, facing east ...................................................................3.0–2
Plate 3.2–3 Overview of the project, facing southeast ....................................................3.0–3
Plate 3.2–4 Overview of the project, facing west ...........................................................3.0–3
Plate 3.2–5 View of the driveway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-
Day Saints building, facing west .................................................................3.0–4
Plate 3.2–6 View of a driveway/walkway to the circa 1955 Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-Day Saints building, facing south .....................................................3.0–4
List of Tables
Table Description Page
Table 1.4–1 Cultural Resources Located Within One-Half Mile of the 8601 Mission
Drive Project ................................................................................................1.0–12
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iv
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT
In response to a request from the project applicant, a cultural resources study was
conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (BFSA) for the proposed 8601 Mission Drive
Project located northeast of the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive in the
city of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The 3.38-acre project includes Assessor’s
Parcel Numbers (APNs) 5389-009-29, -30, and -31 and is situated within Section 18, Township 1
South, Range 11 West, in the USGS El Monte Quadrangle. The project proposes the development
of 37 single-family dwelling units with associated parking, landscaping, and infrastructure.
The purpose of this investigation was to locate and record any cultural resources present
within the project and subsequently evaluate any resources as part of the City of Rosemead
environmental review process conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). An archaeological records search was conducted from the South Central Coastal
Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton (CSU Fullerton) in order to
assess previous archaeological studies and identify any previously recorded archaeological sites
within the project or in the immediate vicinity. The records search identified 21 resources located
within a one-half-mile radius of the current project, one of which (P-19-190503, the Southern
California Edison [SCE] Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Transmission Line) is located within the
subject property. The records search also identified 13 cultural resource reports conducted within
one-half mile of the current project, none of which include the subject property. In addition, a
Sacred Lands Files (SLF) search was requested from the Native American Heritage Commission
(NAHC) to determine if any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or
ceremonial importance are present within the project.
The cultural resources survey was conducted on February 18, 2022. The transmission line
recorded as P-19-190503 is still present running above the property; however, none of the steel
lattice towers, steel poles, or wood poles are within the subject property. The property has been
previously graded and disturbed by the development of the parcel for a church facility. No
additional cultural resources were identified during the survey; however, due to the previous
disturbance of the property and the current coverage of the ground surface by grasses and weeds,
the potential exists that unidentified significant historic deposits may be present. Because of this
potential to encounter buried cultural deposits, monitoring of grading by qualified archaeologists
is recommended. As part of this study, a copy of this report will be submitted to the SCCIC at
CSU Fullerton. All notes, photographs, and other materials related to this project will be curated
at the archaeological laboratory of BFSA in Poway, California.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
The archaeological study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project was conducted in order to
comply with CEQA and City of Rosemead environmental guidelines. The project is located
within the San Gabriel Valley in the northwestern portion of the city of Rosemead, Los Angeles
County, California (Figure 1.1–1). The 3.38-acre project, which includes APNs 5389-009-29, -
30, and -31, is located northeast of the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive.
The project is situated within Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 11 West, in the USGS El
Monte Quadrangle (Figure 1.1–2). The project proposes the development of 37 single-family
dwelling units with associated parking, landscaping, and infrastructure (Figure 1.1–3). The
decision to request this investigation was based upon cultural resource sensitivity of the locality
as suggested by known site density and predictive modeling. Sensitivity for cultural resources in
a given area is usually indicated by known settlement patterns, which in the San Gabriel Valley
of Los Angeles County were focused around freshwater resources and a food supply.
1.2 Environmental Setting
The 8601 Mission Drive Project is generally situated in the Peninsular Ranges Geologic
Province of southern California. The range, which lies in a northwest to southeast trend through
the county, extends approximately 1,000 miles from the Raymond-Malibu Fault Zone in western
Los Angeles County to the southern tip of Baja California. The project is located in the San
Gabriel Valley Basin of the larger Los Angeles Basin, a large structural sedimentary basin
bounded and cut through by several active fault systems in the Los Angeles metropolitan area
(Hillhouse et al. 2002). The concrete-lined Rubio Wash, a tributary to the Rio Hondo, flows
southward approximately one-quarter mile east of the project (Wirths 2022). As mapped by Tan
(1998), the project is underlain by unconsolidated Holocene sandy and gravelly young alluvial
fan and valley deposits. The property is surrounded by residential development.
1.3 Cultural Setting
1.3.1 Prehistoric Period
Several prehistoric cultural chronologies have been proposed for the southern California
coast and nearby inland areas, such as two of the most frequently cited sequences developed by
William Wallace (1955) and Claude Warren (1968). Such chronologies provide a framework to
discuss archaeological data in relation to broad cultural changes seen in the archaeological
record. The chronological sequence presented herein represents an updated synthesis of these
schemes for Los Angeles County and surrounding regions. The prehistoric sequence of the area
can be divided into four broad temporal categories. It should be noted that the prehistoric
chronology for the region is being refined on a continuing basis, with new discoveries and
improvments being made in the accuracy of dating techniques.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–5
Terminal Pleistocene and Early Holocene: Paleo-Coastal Period (circa 9500 to 7000/6500 B.C.)
Although data on early human occupation for the southern California coast is limited,
archaeological evidence from the northern Channel Islands suggests initial settlement within the
region occurred at least 12,000 years before the present (YBP). At Daisy Cave (SMI-261) on
San Miguel Island, radiocarbon dates indicate an early period of use in the terminal Pleistocene,
sometime between 9600 and 9000 calibrated (cal) B.C. (Erlandson et al. 1996). Nearby on Santa
Rosa Island, human remains from the Arlington Springs Site (SRI-1730) have been dated
between 11,000 and 10,000 cal B.C. (Johnson et al. 2002). Archaeological data recovered from
these and other coastal Paleo Indian sites indicate a distinctively maritime cultural adaptation,
termed the “Paleo-Coastal Tradition” (Moratto 1984), which involved the use of seafaring
technology and a subsistence regime focused upon shellfish gathering and fishing (Rick et al.
2001).
Relatively few sites have been identified in Los Angeles County that date to the terminal
Pleistocene and early Holocene. Evidence of possible early human occupation has been found at
the sand dune bluff site of Malaga Cove (LAN-138), located between Redondo Beach and Palos
Verdes (Walker 1951). Researchers have proposed that archaeological remains recovered from
the lowermost cultural stratum at the site, including shell, animal bone, and chipped stone tools,
may date to as early as 8000 cal B.C. (Moratto 1984:168; Wallace 1986).
Middle Holocene: Milling Stone Period (circa 7000/6500 to 1500/1000 B.C.)
The Milling Stone Period or Horizon, also referred to as the “Encinitas Tradition,” is the
earliest well-established cultural occupation of the coastal areas of the region (Sutton 2010;
Sutton and Gardner 2010). The onset of this period, which began sometime between 7000 and
6500 cal B.C., is marked by the expansion of populations throughout southern California.
Regional variations in technology, settlement patterns, and mortuary practices among Milling
Stone sites have led researchers to define several local manifestations or “patterns” of the
tradition (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Groups that occupied modern-day Los Angeles County are
thought to have been relatively small and highly mobile during this time, with a general
subsistence economy focused upon the gathering of shellfish and plant foods, particularly hard
seeds, with hunting being of less importance (Glassow et al. 2007).
Two temporal subdivisions have been defined for the portion of the Topanga Pattern
falling within the Milling Stone Period: Topanga I (circa 6500 to 3000 B.C.) and Topanga II
(circa 3000 to 1000 B.C.) (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Topanga I assemblages are characterized
by abundant manos and metates, core tools and scrapers, charmstones, cogged stone, and
discoidals. Projectile points are quite rare, with those present resembling earlier, large, leaf-
shaped forms (Glassow et al. 2007). Secondary inhumations with associated cairns are the most
common burial form at Milling Stone sites, with small numbers of identified extended
inhumations. The subsequent Topanga II phase largely represents a continuation of the Topanga
pattern with site assemblages characterized by numerous manos and metates, charmstones,
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–6
cogged stones, discoidals, and some stone balls. A significant technological change in ground
stone occurs at this time, with the appearance of mortars and pestles at Topanga II sites
suggesting the adoption of balanophagy by coastal populations (Sutton and Gardner 2010). The
quantity of projectile points also notably increases in Topanga II site deposits, indicating that the
hunting of large game may have played a greater role in the subsistence economy than in earlier
times. While secondary burials continue to be quite common, a few flexed inhumations have
also been recovered from archaeological contexts dating to the Topanga II phase.
A number of Milling Stone sites have been identified in Los Angeles County. The lower
component of the Tank Site (LAN-1), located in the Santa Monica Mountains, was excavated in
the 1940s and was determined to be Topanga I in age. In the San Fernando Valley, the Encino
Site (LAN-111) is thought to have contained a Topanga I component. The artifact assemblage is
definitive of the Topanga I period, containing many milling implements, but few projectile
points. The presence of mortars and pestles along with stemmed projectile points at the
Chatsworth Site (LAN-21), located at the western edge of the San Fernando Valley, suggests a
Topanga II presence. The Big Tujunga Wash Site (LAN-167), located at the eastern edge of the
San Fernando Valley, may have also contained a Topanga II component (Sutton and Gardner
2010).
Late Holocene: Intermediate Period (1500/1000 B.C. to A.D. 750)
The Intermediate Period, which encompasses the early portion of the “Del Rey
Tradition,” as defined by Sutton (Sutton 2010), begins around 3,500 YBP. At this time,
significant changes are seen throughout the coastal areas of southern California in material
culture, settlement systems, subsistence strategies, and mortuary practices. These new cultural
traits have been attributed to the arrival of Takic-speaking people from the southern San Joaquin
Valley (Sutton 2009). Biological, archaeological, and linguistic data indicates that the Takic
groups who settled in the Los Angeles Basin were ethnically distinct from the preexisting
Hokan-speaking Topanga populations, and are believed to be ancestral to ethnographic
Gabrielino groups (Sutton 2009). While archaeological evidence indicates that “relic” Topanga
III populations continued to survive in isolation in the Santa Monica Mountains, these
indigenous groups appear to have been largely replaced or absorbed by the Gabrielino, or
Chumash, by 2,000 YBP (Sutton and Gardner 2010:17).
Intermediate Period sites in the region are represented by the “Angeles Pattern” of the
Del Rey Tradition (Sutton 2010). Three temporal subdivisions have been defined for the portion
of the Angeles Pattern that falls within the Intermediate Period: Angeles I (1500 to 600 B.C.),
Angeles II (600 B.C. to A.D. 400), and Angeles III (A.D. 400 to 750) (Sutton and Gardner
2010:8). The onset of the Angeles I phase is characterized by the increase and aggregation of
regional populations and the appearance of the first village settlements. The prevalence of
projectile points, single-piece shell fishhooks, and bone harpoon points at Angeles I sites
suggests a subsistence shift in the Intermediate Period, an increased emphasis on fishing and
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–7
terrestrial hunting, and less reliance upon the gathering of shellfish resources. Regional trade or
interaction networks also appeared to develop at this time, with coastal populations in Los
Angeles County obtaining small steatite artifacts and Olivella sp. shell beads from the southern
Channel Islands and obsidian from the Coso Volcanic Field (Koerper et al. 2002). Finally,
marked changes are seen in mortuary practices during the Angeles I phase with flexed primary
inhumations and cremations replacing extended inhumations and cairns.
The Angeles II phase largely represents a continuation and elaboration of the Angeles I
technology, settlement, and subsistence systems. One exception to this pattern is the
introduction of a new funerary complex around 2,600 YBP, consisting of large rock cairns or
platforms, which contain abundant broken tools, faunal remains, and cremated human bone.
These mortuary features have generally been thought to represent the predecessor of the
Southern California Mourning Ceremony (Sutton 2010:14).
Several important changes in the archaeological record mark the beginning of the
Angeles III phase. At this time, larger seasonal villages characterized by well-developed
middens and cemeteries were established along the coast or the inland areas. Archaeological
data from Angeles III sites indicates that residents of these settlements practiced a fairly diverse
subsistence strategy, which included the exploitation of both marine and terrestrial resources
(Sutton 2010:16). Notable technological changes at this time included the introduction of the
plank canoe and the bow and arrow (Glassow et al. 2007:203-204). The appearance of new
Olivella sp. bead types at Angeles III sites indicates a reconfiguration of existing regional
exchange networks with increased interaction with populations in the Gulf of California
(Koerper et al. 2002). Finally, cremations increase slightly in frequency at this time, with
inhumations no longer placed in an extended position (Sutton 2010:18). Intermediate Period
sites in Los Angeles County include LAN-2 and LAN-197, which are located in the Santa
Monica Mountains. The formal cemeteries at these sites are representative of the increased
sedentism that occurred during the Intermediate Period (Glassow et al. 2007:202).
Late Holocene: Late Period (A.D. 750 to Spanish Contact)
The Late Period dates from approximately A.D. 750 until Spanish contact in 1542.
Sutton (2010) has divided this period, which falls within the larger Del Rey Tradition, into two
phases: Angeles IV (A.D. 750 to 1200) and Angeles V (A.D. 1200 to 1550). The Angeles IV
phase is characterized by the continued growth of regional populations and the development of
large, sedentary villages. Although chiefdoms appear to have developed in the northern Channel
Islands and the Santa Barbara region after 850 YBP (Arnold 1992; Gamble 2005), little direct
evidence has been found to suggest that this level of social complexity existed in the Los
Angeles area during the Late Prehistoric Period (Sutton 2010).
Several new types of material culture appear during the Angeles IV phase, including
Cottonwood series points, birdstone and “spike” effigies, Olivella sp. cupped beads, and Mytilus
sp. shell disc beads. The presence of southwestern pottery, Patayan ceramic figurines, and
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–8
Hohokam shell bracelets at Angeles IV sites suggests some interaction between groups in
southern California and the Southwest. Notable changes are seen in regional exchange networks
after 800 YBP, with an increase in the number and size of steatite artifacts, including large
vessels, elaborate effigies, and comals (cooking dishes) recovered from Angeles V sites. The
presence of these artifacts suggests a strengthening of trade ties between coastal Los Angeles
populations and the southern Channel Islands (Koerper et al. 2002:69). Finally, Late Period
mortuary practices remain largely unchanged from the Intermediate Period, with flexed primary
inhumations continuing to be the preferred burial method.
Late Period sites in Los Angeles County include LAN-227 and LAN-229, which are
located in the Santa Monica Mountains. Both sites contain fewer manos and metates than earlier
sites, but more mortars, pestles, projectile points, drills, beads, pipes, and bone tools (Moratto
1984:141). Although these sites represent a move toward centralized sedentary villages during
this period, it is unclear whether they represent year-round occupation or semi-permanent
villages used as base settlements (Glassow et al. 2007:210).
Late Holocene / Protohistoric Period / The Gabrieliño (1769 to Present)
During the late Holocene, population size and density increased dramatically, calling for
an even more diversified economy (Altschul and Grenda 2002). Ethnographic data, the first of
which came from Spanish explorers and missionaries, indicates that the Gabrieliño (Tongva)
were the major tribe established within the San Gabriel Valley. The Spanish attributed this name
to the Native Americans in the area served by the Mission San Gabriel Archángel. Gabrieliño
territory included the watersheds of the San Gabriel, Santa Ana, and Los Angeles rivers, portions
of the Santa Monica and Santa Ana mountains, the Los Angeles Basin, the coast from Aliso
Creek to Topanga Creek, and San Clemente, San Nicolas, and Santa Catalina islands (Moratto
1984). The Gabrieliño spoke a Cupan language that was part of the Shoshonean or Takic family
of Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock; these linguistic ties united a dispersed ethnic group occupying
1,500 square miles in the Los Angeles Basin region (Altschul and Grenda 2002). Interestingly,
this language stock was different from that of the Chumash to the north in the Santa Barbara
region, as well as from the Kumeyaay (Tipai and Ipai) in the San Diego region, both of which
spoke languages of the Hokan stock, using different dialects.
Ethnographic data states that the Gabrieliño were hunters and gatherers whose food
sources included acorns, seeds, marine mollusks, fish, and mammals; archaeological sites
support this data, with evidence of hunting, gathering, processing, and storage implements
including arrow points, fishhooks, scrapers, grinding stones, and basketry awls (Altschul and
Grenda 2002). Santa Catalina Island provided a valuable source of steatite for the Gabrieliño,
which they quarried and traded to other groups (Heizer and Treganza 1972; Moratto 1984).
About 50 to 100 permanent villages are estimated to have been in existence at the time of
European contact, most of which were located along lowland rivers and streams, and along
sheltered areas of the coast (Moratto 1984). Smaller satellite villages and resource extraction
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–9
sites were located between larger villages. Village sites contained varying types of structures,
including houses, sweathouses, and ceremonial huts (Bean and Smith 1978). Artistic items
included shell set in asphaltum, carvings, painting, steatite, and baskets (Moratto 1984).
Settlements were often located at the intersection of two or more ecozones, thus increasing the
variety of resources that were immediately accessible (Moratto 1984). Offshore fishing and
hunting was accomplished with the use of plank boats, while shellfish and birds were collected
along the coast. At the time of European contact, the Gabrieliño, second only to the Chumash,
were the wealthiest, most populous, and most powerful ethnic group in southern California
(Bean and Smith 1978; Moratto 1984).
As with other Native American populations in southern California, the arrival of the
Spanish drastically changed life for the Gabrieliño. Incorporation into the mission system
disrupted their culture and changed their subsistence practices (Altschul and Grenda 2002).
Ranchos were established throughout the area, often in major drainages where Native American
villages tended to be located. By the early 1800s, Mission San Gabriel had expanded its
holdings for grazing to include much of the former Gabrieliño territory (Altschul and Grenda
2002). Eventually, widespread relocation of Native American groups occurred, resulting in
further disruption of the native lifeways. Together with the introduction of Euro-American
diseases, the Gabrieliño and other groups of southern California experienced drastic population
declines; in the early 1860s, a smallpox epidemic nearly wiped out the remaining Gabrieliño
population (Moratto 1984). While people of Gabrieliño descent still live in the Los Angeles
area, the Gabrieliño were no longer listed as a culturally identifiable group in the 1900 Federal
Census (Bean and Smith 1978; Moratto 1984).
1.3.2 Ethnohistoric Period
Traditionally, the history of the state of California has been divided into three general
periods: the Spanish Period (1769 to 1821), the Mexican Period (1822 to 1846), and the
American Period (1848 to present) (Caughey 1970). The American Period is often further
subdivided into additional phases: the nineteenth century (1848 to 1900), the early twentieth
century (1900 to 1950), and the Modern Period (1950 to present). From an archaeological
standpoint, all of these phases can be referred to together as the Ethnohistoric Period. This
provides a valuable tool for archaeologists, as ethnohistory is directly concerned with the study
of indigenous or non-Western peoples from a combined historical/anthropological viewpoint,
which employs written documents, oral narrative, material culture, and ethnographic data for
analysis.
European exploration along the California coast began in 1542 with the landing of Juan
Rodriguez Cabrillo and his men at San Diego Bay. Sixty years after the Cabrillo expeditions, an
expedition under Sebastian Viscaíno made an extensive and thorough exploration of the Pacific
coast. Although the voyage did not extend beyond the northern limits of the Cabrillo track,
Viscaíno had the most lasting effect upon the nomenclature of the coast. Many of his place
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–10
names have survived, whereas practically every one of the names created by Cabrillo have faded
from use. For instance, Cabrillo named the first (now) United States port he stopped at “San
Miguel”; 60 years later, Viscaíno changed it to “San Diego” (Rolle 1969).
The historic background of the project area began with the Spanish colonization of Alta
California. The first Spanish colonizing expedition reached southern California in 1769 with the
intention of converting and civilizing the indigenous populations, as well as expanding the
knowledge of and access to new resources in the region (Brigandi 1998). As a result, by the late
eighteenth century, a large portion of southern California was overseen by Mission San Luis Rey
(San Diego County), Mission San Juan Capistrano (Orange County), and Mission San Gabriel
(Los Angeles County), who began colonizing the region and surrounding areas (Chapman 1921).
Each mission gained power through the support of a large, subjugated Native American
workforce. As the missions grew, livestock holdings increased and became more vulnerable to
theft. In order to protect their interests, the southern California missions began to expand inland
to try and provide additional security (Beattie and Beattie 1939; Caughey 1970). In order to
meet their needs, the Spaniards embarked upon a formal expedition in 1806 to find potential
locations within what is now the San Bernardino Valley. As a result, by 1810, Father Francisco
Dumetz of Mission San Gabriel had succeeded in establishing a religious site, or capilla, at a
Cahuilla rancheria called Guachama (Beattie and Beattie 1939). San Bernardino Valley received
its name from this site, which was dedicated to San Bernardino de Siena by Father Dumetz. The
Guachama rancheria was located in present-day Bryn Mawr in San Bernardino County.
The indigenous groups who occupied these lands were recruited by missionaries,
converted, and put to work in the missions (Pourade 1961). Throughout this period, the Native
American populations were decimated by introduced diseases, a drastic shift in diet resulting in
poor nutrition, and social conflicts due to the introduction of an entirely new social order (Cook
1976). On September 8, 1771, Father Pedro Cambón and Father Angel Somera established
Mission San Gabriel de Arcángel near the present-day city of Montebello. In 1775, the mission
was moved to its current location in San Gabriel due to better agricultural lands. This mission
was the first sustained European occupation of the Los Angeles County area. The San Gabriel
mission, despite a slow start that was partially due to misconduct by Spanish soldiers, eventually
became so prosperous that it was known as “The Queen of the Missions” (Johnson et al. 1972).
The pueblo of Los Angeles was established in 1781. During this period, Spain also
deeded ranchos to prominent citizens and soldiers (though very few in comparison to the later
Mexican Period). One such rancho, Rancho San Pedro, was deeded to soldier Juan Jose
Dominguez in 1784 and comprised 75,000 acres, encompassing the modern South Bay region
from the Los Angeles River on the east to the Pacific Ocean on the west.
Mission San Fernando Rey de España was established in 1797 by Fray Fermin de
Lasuén, who brought three families from a different mission. Upon their arrival, Spain granted
the land now known as San Fernando Valley to the mission. After construction of the mission,
traffic through the valley increased via the “Indian trail,” which led from Mission San Fernando
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–11
to Mission Santa Buenaventura and was part of the El Camino del Santa Susana y Simi trail that
stretched over Santa de Susana Pass (Watson 1991).
The area that became Los Angeles County saw an increase in European settlement during
the Mexican Period, largely due to the many land grants (ranchos) given to Mexican citizens by
various governors. The period ended when Mexican forces fought the combined United States
Army and Navy forces in the Battle of the San Gabriel River on January 8, 1847, and the Battle
of La Mesa on January 9, 1847 (Nevin 1978). On January 10, 1847, leaders of the pueblo of Los
Angeles peacefully surrendered after Mexican General Jose Maria Flores withdrew his forces.
Shortly thereafter, Andrés Pico, the newly appointed Mexican Military Commander of
California, surrendered all of Alta California to United States Army Lieutenant Colonel John C.
Fremont in the Treaty of Cahuenga (Nevin 1978).
Settlement of the Los Angeles region accelerated during the early American Period. Los
Angeles County was established on February 18, 1850. It was one of 27 counties established in
the months prior to California becoming a state. Many ranchos in the county were sold or
otherwise acquired by Americans, and most were subdivided into agricultural parcels or towns.
Ranching retained its importance, and by the late 1860s, Los Angeles was one of the top dairy
production centers in the country (Rolle 1969). In 1854, the United States Congress agreed to let
San Pedro become an official port of entry, and by the 1880s, the railroads had established
networks throughout the county. This resulted in fast and affordable shipment of goods and a
means to transport new residents to the booming region (Dumke 1944). New residents included
many health-seekers that were drawn to the area during the 1870s and the 1880s due to the
fabled climate (Baur 1959). In 1876, the county had a population of 30,000 (Dumke 1944:7); by
1900, it had reached 100,000.
In the early to mid-1900s, population growth accelerated due to industry associated with
both world wars and emigration from the Midwest “dust bowl” states during the Great
Depression. Los Angeles County became one of the most densely occupied areas in the United
States. The county’s mild climate and successful economy continued to draw new residents in
the late 1900s, and as a result, much of the county transformed from ranches and farms into
residential subdivisions surrounding commercial and industrial centers. Hollywood’s
development into the entertainment capital of the world and southern California’s booming
aerospace industry were key factors in the county’s growth.
Project Area and Vicinity
The city of Rosemead was formed in an area that “was part of the San Gabriel Mission
during the Spanish colonial period until the early 1850s” (City of Rosemead 2010). In 1852,
John and Harriet Guest settled on “the [100-acre] Savannah Ranch, which is located on the
current Savannah School site” in Rosemead (City of Rosemead 2010, 2017). “Leonard J. and
Amanda Rose were other early settlers, who established Rose’s Meadows (Rosemead Ranch) as
a winery, as well as a breeding and training area for horses” (City of Rosemead 2010). Rose’s
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–12
Meadow eventually gave the city of Rosemead its name (City of Rosemead 2017). Rosemead
was historically “known for small farms, as well as chicken and rabbit ranches. The City was
incorporated in 1959 with a population of 15,476. Forty-seven years after incorporation, the City
of Rosemead had an estimated population of 57,144” (City of Rosemead 2010).
1.4 Results of the Archaeological Records Search
An archaeological records search for the project and the surrounding area within a one-
half-mile radius was conducted at the SCCIC at CSU Fullerton. The records search indicates
that 21 cultural resources are located within a one-half-mile radius of the project, one of which
(P-19-190503, the SCE Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Transmission Line) is located within the
subject property. The remaining 20 cultural resources are all historic and include a railroad,
single-family residences, a public utility building, industrial and commercial buildings,
engineering structures, and a religious building.
Table 1.4–1
Cultural Resources Located Within One-Half
Mile of the 8601 Mission Drive Project
Site(s) Description
P-19-186112 Historic railroad
P-19-187027, P-19-187030, P-19-188612, P-19-188614, P-19-188615, P-19-188616,
P-19-188617, P-19-188618, and P-19-188619
Historic single-family residence
P-19-188607 Historic public utility building
P-19-188608 and P-19-188610 Historic warehouse
P-19-188611 and P-19-188609 Historic commercial/ industrial building(s)
P-19-188702 Historic Eagle Rock-Mesa 220kV Transmission Line
P-19-188703 Historic Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Subtransmission Line
P-19-188704 Historic Mesa-Vincent 220kV and Goodrich-Laguna Bell 220 kV Transmission Lines
P-19-188705 Historic Mesa-Rosemead No.2 Subtransmission Line and Segovia 16 kV Local Distribution Line
P-19-190503 SCE Mesa-Ravendale-Rush 66kV Transmission Line
P-19-190256 Historic church
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–13
The records search also indicates that 13 cultural resource studies have been conducted
within a one-half-mile radius of the project (Appendix B), none of which include the current
project.
The following historic sources were also reviewed:
• The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Index
• The Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), Archaeological Determinations of
Eligibility
• The OHP, Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD)
• Bureau of Land Management (BLM) General Land Office (GLO) records
• The USGS 1968 edition of the 1966 7.5' El Monte topographic quadrangle
• Historic aerial photographs dating between 1948 and 2018
According to aerial photographs, a large structure was constructed on the property between 1953
and 1964 but was demolished by 1992. The 1968 edition of the 1966 7.5' El Monte topographic
quadrangle shows the structure on the property as being a church. A “new church at 8601
Mission Drive, Rosemead” was listed in the Los Angeles Times in 1955 for “members of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints” (Los Angeles Times 1965). The structure is not
listed in SCCIC, BERD, NRHP, or California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) files.
BFSA also requested a NAHC SLF to determine if any recorded Native American sacred
sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance are present within the project. The
NAHC results were positive for the presence of sacred sites or locations of religious or
ceremonial importance within the search radius. The NAHC recommended contacting the
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. As the lead agency, the City of Rosemead is
responsible for Native American consultation per the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52
(Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014). AB 52 established a formal consultation process for California
tribes as part of the CEQA process. Tribal consultation is not required as part of the Phase I
study and is best served by a government-to-government model. As a result, no additional
outreach was conducted by BFSA for the current project nor is it required. However, the NAHC
included the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation on an email regarding the
positive results of the SLF search. All correspondence can be found in Appendix C.
The records search and literature review suggest that there is a low potential for
prehistoric sites to be contained within the boundaries of the property due to the extensive nature
of past ground disturbances and the lack of natural resources often associated with prehistoric
sites. No prehistoric sites have been recorded within one-half mile of the project. The records
search and literature review suggest that historic buildings and sites associated with the
agricultural history of the region are the most likely cultural resources to be encountered within
the project. Based upon the previously recorded surrounding resources and the historic aerial
photographs, there is a potential for historic resources to be located within the subject property.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–14
1.5 Applicable Regulations
Resource importance is assigned to districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that
possess exceptional value or quality illustrating or interpreting the heritage of Los Angeles
County in history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture. A number of criteria are
used in demonstrating resource importance. Specifically, the criteria outlined in CEQA provides
the guidance for making such a determination. The following sections detail the criteria that a
resource must meet in order to be determined important.
1.5.1 California Environmental Quality Act
According to CEQA (§15064.5a), the term “historical resource” includes the following:
1) A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources
Commission for listing in the CRHR (Public Resources Code [PRC] SS5024.1, Title
14 CCR. Section 4850 et seq.).
2) A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Section
5020.1(k) of the PRC or identified as significant in an historical resource survey
meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, shall be presumed to be
historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as
significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not
historically or culturally significant.
3) Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript, which a lead
agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural,
engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military,
or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical resource,
provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light
of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to
be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the CRHR
(PRC SS5024.1, Title 14, Section 4852) including the following:
a) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage;
b) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;
c) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of
construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or
possesses high artistic values; or
d) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or
history.
4) The fact that a resource is not listed on, or determined eligible for listing on, the
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–15
CRHR, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to Section
5020.1[k] of the PRC), or identified in an historical resources survey (meeting the
criteria in Section 5024.1[g] of the PRC) does not preclude a lead agency from
determining that the resource may be an historical resource as defined in PRC Section
5020.1(j) or 5024.1.
According to CEQA (§15064.5b), a project with an effect that may cause a substantial
adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a
significant effect on the environment. CEQA defines a substantial adverse change as:
1) Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource means
physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its
immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be
materially impaired.
2) The significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project:
a) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical
characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance
and that justify its inclusion on, or eligibility for inclusion on, the CRHR; or
b) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical
characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical
resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or its identification in an
historical resources survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of
the PRC, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project
establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically
or culturally significant; or,
c) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical
characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance
and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the CRHR as determined by a
lead agency for purposes of CEQA.
Section 15064.5(c) of CEQA applies to effects on archaeological sites and contains the
following additional provisions regarding archaeological sites:
1. When a project will impact an archaeological site, a lead agency shall first determine
whether the site is an historical resource, as defined in subsection (a).
2. If a lead agency determines that the archaeological site is an historical resource, it
shall refer to the provisions of Section 21084.1 of the PRC, Section 15126.4 of the
guidelines, and the limits contained in Section 21083.2 of the PRC do not apply.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.0–16
3. If an archaeological site does not meet the criteria defined in subsection (a), but does
meet the definition of a unique archaeological resource in Section 21083.2 of the
PRC, the site shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section 21083.2.
The time and cost limitations described in PRC Section 21083.2 (c-f) do not apply to
surveys and site evaluation activities intended to determine whether the project
location contains unique archaeological resources.
4. If an archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological nor historical
resource, the effects of the project on those resources shall not be considered a
significant effect on the environment. It shall be sufficient that both the resource and
the effect on it are noted in the Initial Study or Environmental Impact Report, if one is
prepared to address impacts on other resources, but they need not be considered
further in the CEQA process.
Section 15064.5(d) and (e) contain additional provisions regarding human remains.
Regarding Native American human remains, paragraph (d) provides:
(d) When an Initial Study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native
American human remains within the project, a lead agency shall work with the
appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided in PRC
SS5097.98. The applicant may develop an agreement for treating or disposing of,
with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any items associated with Native
American burials with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC.
Action implementing such an agreement is exempt from:
1) The general prohibition on disinterring, disturbing, or removing human
remains from any location other than a dedicated cemetery (Health and Safety
Code Section 7050.5).
2) The requirements of CEQA and the Coastal Act.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2.0–1
2.0 RESEARCH DESIGN
The primary goal of the research design is to attempt to understand the way in which
humans have used the land and resources within the project through time, as well as to aid in the
determination of resource significance. For the current project, the study area under investigation
is southeastern Los Angeles County. The scope of work for the cultural resources study conducted
for the 8601 Mission Drive Project included the survey of a 3.38-acre property. Given the area
involved and the recorded presence of nearby cultural resources, the research design for this project
was focused upon realistic study options. Since the main objective of the investigation was to
identify the presence of and potential impacts to cultural resources, the goal is not necessarily to
answer wide-reaching theories regarding the development of early southern California, but to
investigate the role and importance of identified resources. Nevertheless, the assessment of the
significance of a resource must take into consideration a variety of characteristics, as well as the
ability of a resource to address regional research topics and issues.
Although elementary resource evaluation programs are limited in terms of the amount of
information available, several specific research questions were developed that could be used to
guide the initial investigations of any observed cultural resources. The following research
questions take into account the size and location of the project discussed above.
Research Questions:
• Can located cultural resources be associated with a specific time period, population, or
individual?
• Do the types of any located cultural resources allow a site activity/function to be
determined from a preliminary investigation? What are the site activities? What is the
site function? What resources were exploited?
• How do located sites compare to others reported from different surveys conducted in
the area?
• How do located sites fit existing models of settlement and subsistence for valley
environments of the region?
Data Needs
At the survey level, the principal research objective is a generalized investigation of
changing settlement patterns in both the prehistoric and historic periods within the study area. The
overall goal is to understand settlement and resource procurement patterns of the project area
occupants. Therefore, adequate information on site function, context, and chronology from an
archaeological perspective is essential for the investigation. The fieldwork and archival research
were undertaken with the following primary research goals in mind:
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2.0–2
1) To identify cultural resources occurring within the project;
2) To determine, if possible, site type and function, context of the resource(s), and
chronological placement of each cultural resource identified;
3) To place each cultural resource identified within a regional perspective; and
4) To provide recommendations for the treatment of each cultural resource identified.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.0–1
3.0 FIELD SURVEY
The cultural resources study of the project consisted of an institutional records search and
an intensive cultural resource survey of the entire 3.38-acre project. This study was conducted in
conformance with City of Rosemead environmental guidelines, Section 21083.2 of the California
PRC, and CEQA. Statutory requirements of CEQA (Section 15064.5) were followed for the
identification and evaluation of resources. Specific definitions for archaeological resource type(s)
used in this report are those established by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO 1995)
and the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance.
3.1 Survey Methods
The survey methodology employed during the current investigation followed standard
archaeological field procedures and was sufficient to accomplish a thorough assessment of the
project. Staff archaeologist Allison Reynolds conducted the intensive pedestrian survey on
February 18, 2022. The field methodology employed for the project included walking evenly
spaced survey transects set approximately five to 10 meters apart while visually inspecting the
ground surface. Visibility of the natural ground surface was good throughout the property and was
only constrained by small areas of pavement. All potentially sensitive areas where cultural
resources might be located were closely inspected. Photographs documenting survey areas and
overall survey conditions were taken frequently.
3.2 Results
The entire property has been graded and two areas of concrete are present. Vegetation
consists of non-native grasses and weeds with palm and other non-native trees scattered across the
property (Plates 3.2–1 to 3.2–4). The concrete remnants on the western and southern project
boundaries are driveways/walkways to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints church that
was present from circa 1955 (Los Angeles Times 1955) to circa 1992 but has since been demolished
(see Plates 3.2–2, 3.2–5, and 3.2–6). The transmission line recorded as P-19-190503 is still present
running above the property (see Plates 3.2–1 to 3.2–6); however, none of the steel lattice towers,
steel poles, or wood poles are within the subject property. The resource was recorded as
“Approximately 50 steel lattice towers, tubular steel poles, and wood poles … erected along the
[11-mile] span” (Becker and Crane 2010).
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.0–2
Plate 3.2–1: Overview of the project, facing northwest.
Plate 3.2–2: View of the driveway to the circa 1955 Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints building, facing east.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.0–3
Plate 3.2–3: Overview of the project, facing southeast.
Plate 3.2–4: Overview of the project, facing west.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.0–4
Plate 3.2–5: View of the driveway to the circa 1955 Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints building, facing west.
Plate 3.2–6: View of a driveway/walkway to the circa 1955 Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints building, facing south.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.0–5
According to the site record form:
The Mesa-Ravendale-Rush Transmission Line does not appear to be eligible under
National Register / California Register Criterion A / 4. The 11-mile span of low-
voltage electrical transmission lines were not installed or constructed to include any
innovative or unique features or materials that would constitute further study, and
beyond what is discussed in this [Urabana Preservation & Planning, LLC] report,
no information was found during the course of contextual or property-specific
research to indicate that the line could yield additional information which could be
considered important to local, state, or national history. (Becker and Crane 2010)
The survey did not result in the identification of any additional cultural resources.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4.0–1
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The Phase I archaeological assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project was negative
for the presence of cultural resources, aside from the power transmission lines that cross above
the property. As stated previously, the subject property has been impacted and graded in the past
for the development of the church facility circa 1955. Whether or not cultural resources have
ever existed on the subject property is unclear. The current status of the property appears to have
affected the potential to discover any surface scatters of artifacts or cultural materials that may
have been on-site prior to the grading of the property for the church facility. Given that the prior
development within the property might mask archaeological deposits, there is a potential that
buried archaeological deposits are present within the project boundaries. Therefore, it is
recommended that the project be allowed to proceed with the implementation of a cultural
resources monitoring program conducted by an archaeologist and Native American
representative during grading of the property. The cultural resources monitoring recommended
as a condition of approval for this property is presented in Section 4.1.
4.1 Construction Monitoring Program
Monitoring during ground-disturbing activities, such as grading or trenching, by a
qualified archaeologist is recommended to ensure that if buried features (i.e., human remains,
hearths, or cultural deposits) are present, they will be handled in a timely and proper manner.
The scope of the monitoring program is provided below:
1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide written verification
that a certified archaeologist has been retained to implement the monitoring program.
This verification shall be presented in a letter from the project archaeologist to the
lead agency.
2) The project applicant shall provide Native American monitoring during grading. The
Native American monitor shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to
observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials.
3) The certified archaeologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the contractors
to explain and coordinate the requirements of the monitoring program.
4) During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological
monitor(s) and tribal representative shall be on-site, as determined by the consulting
archaeologist, to perform periodic inspections of the excavations. The frequency of
inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the
presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall
have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural
resources appears to be less than anticipated.
5) Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4.0–2
field so the monitored grading can proceed.
6) In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, the
archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance
operation in the area of discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant
cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the lead agency at the time of
discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency, shall determine
the significance of the discovered resources. The lead agency must concur with the
evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected
area. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery
Program to mitigate impacts shall be prepared by the consulting archaeologist and
approved by the lead agency before being carried out using professional
archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the medical examiner-
coroner and lead agency shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are
determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant, as
identified by the NAHC, shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment
and disposition of the remains.
7) Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts
shall be recovered and features recorded using professional archaeological methods.
The project archaeologist shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for
an adequate artifact sample for analysis.
8) All cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be
processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards. The
collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an
appropriate curation facility, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for
permanent curation.
9) A report documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and
research data within the research context shall be completed and submitted to the
satisfaction of the lead agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
report will include Department of Parks and Recreation Primary and Archaeological
Site Forms.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5.0–1
5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED
The archaeological survey program for the 8601 Mission Drive Project was directed by
Principal Investigator Brian F. Smith. The archaeological fieldwork was conducted by staff
archaeologist Allison Reynolds. The report text was prepared by Brian F. Smith and Elena C
Goralogia. Report graphics were created by Jillian L.H. Conroy. Technical editing and report
production were conducted by Elena C. Goralogia. The archaeological records search was
provided by the SCCIC at CSU Fullerton.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6.0–1
6.0 REFERENCES CITED
Altschul, Jeffery H. and Donn R. Grenda
2002 Islanders and Mainlanders: Prehistoric Context for the Southern California Bight.
SRI Press, Tucson, Arizona.
Baur, John E.
1959 The Health Seekers of Southern California. Huntington Library Publications, San
Marino, California.
Bean, Lowell John and Charles R. Smith
1978 Gabrieliño. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 538–549. Handbook of
North American Indians, Vol. 8. William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian
Institution, Washington, D.C.
Beattie, George W. and Helen P. Beattie
1939 Heritage of the Valley: San Bernardino’s First Century. Biobooks, Oakland,
California.
Becker, Wendy L. Tinsley and Heather Crane
2010 Site record form for P-19-190503. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC. On file at
the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University,
Fullerton, Fullerton, California.
Brigandi, Phil
1998 Temecula: At the Crossroads of History. Heritage Media Corporation, Encinitas,
California.
Caughey, John W.
1970 California, A Remarkable State’s Life History. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey.
Chapman, Charles E.
1921 A History of California: The Spanish Period. The Macmillan Company, New York.
City of Rosemead
2010 City of Rosemead General Plan Update. Electronic document,
https://p1cdn4static.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10034989/File/Gov/City
%20Departments/Community%20Development/Planning/Rosemead.pdf, accessed
February 23, 2022.
2017 About Rosemead. Electronic document, https://www.cityofrosemead.org/visitors/
about_rosemead, accessed February 23, 2022.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6.0–2
Cook, Sherburne F.
1976 The Conflict Between the California Indian and White Civilization. University of
California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.
Dumke, Glenn S.
1944 The Boom of the Eighties in Southern California. Huntington Library Publications,
San Marino, California.
Erlandson, J.M., D.J. Kennett, B.L. Ingram, D.A. Guthrie, D.P. Morris, M.A. Tveshov, G.J.
West, and P.L. Walker
1996 An Archaeological and Paleontological Chronology for Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261),
San Miguel Island, California. Radiocarbon 38:355–373.
Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell
2007 Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges. In
California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by T.L. Jones
and K.A. Klar, pp. 191–213. Altamira Press, New York.
Heizer, Robert F. and Adam E. Treganza
1972 Mines and Quarries of the Indians of California. Ballena Press, Ramona, California.
Hillhouse, J.W., E.G. Reichard, and D.J. Ponti
2002 Probing the Los Angeles Basin – Insights into ground-water resources and earthquake
hazards. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 086-02. Electronic document,
https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs086-02/fs086-02.pdf, accessed March 4, 2022.
Johnson, J.R., T.W. Stafford, H.O. Ajie, and D.P. Morris
2002 Arlington Springs Revisited. In Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands
Symposium, edited by D. Browne, K. Mitchell, and H. Chaney, pp. 541–545. Santa
Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California.
Johnson, Paul C., Dorothy Krell, John S. Weir, Harry Downie, Adrian Wilson, Joe Seney, Philip
Spencer, and France Carpentier
1972 The California Missions: A Pictorial History. Sunset Books, Lane Publishing, Menlo
Park, California.
Koerper, Henry C., Roger D. Mason, and Mark L. Peterson
2002 Complexity, Demography, and Change in Late Holocene Orange County. In
Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, edited by
J.M. Erlandson and T.L. Jones, pp. 63–81. University of California, Los Angeles,
Institute of Archaeology.
Los Angeles Times
1955 Keep Youths Busy. 24 April:46. Los Angeles, California.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6.0–3
1965 Vandals Desecrate Hard-Won Lawn. 28 December:85. Los Angeles, California.
Moratto, Michael J.
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.
Nevin, David
1978 The Mexican War. Time-Life Books, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia.
Pourade, Richard F.
1961 Time of the Bells. The History of San Diego Volume 2. Union-Tribune Publishing
Company, San Diego, California.
1963 The Silver Dons. The History of San Diego Volume 3. Union-Tribune Publishing
Company, San Diego, California.
Rick, T.C., J.M. Erlandson, and R.L. Vellanoweth
2001 Paleocoastal Fishing Along the Pacific Coast of the Americas: Evidence from Daisy
Cave, San Miguel Island, California. American Antiquity 66:595–614.
Rolle, Andrew F.
1969 California: A History (Second Edition). Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York.
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
1995 Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Office of Historic Preservation,
Sacramento.
Sutton, Mark Q.
2009 People and Language: Defining the Takic Expansion into Southern California.
Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 41(2&3):31–93.
2010 The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California. Pacific
Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 44(2):1–54.
Sutton, Mark Q. and Jill K. Gardner
2010 Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California. Pacific Coast
Archaeological Society Quarterly 42(4):1–64.
Tan, S.S.
1998 Geologic map of the El Monte 7.5' quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California: a
digital database. California Division of Mines and Geology Open-file report 98-29.
Walker, Edwin Francis
1951 Five Prehistoric Sites in Los Angeles County, California. Publications of the
Frederick Webb Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund 6:1–116. Southwest Museum,
Los Angeles.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6.0–4
Wallace, William J.
1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern
Journal of Anthropology 11:214–230.
1986 Archaeological Research at Malaga Cove. In Symposium: A New Look at Some Old
Sites, edited by G.S. Breschini and T. Haversat, pp. 21–27. Coyote Press Archives of
California Archaeology, Salinas, California.
Warren, Claude N. (editor)
1968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern Coast, In: Archaic
Prehistory in the Western United States, C.I. Williams ed. Eastern New Mexico
University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3):1–14.
Watson, Virginia
1991 Chatsworth History. The Chatsworth Historical Society, Chatsworth, California.
Wirths, Todd A.
2022 Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project, City of Rosemead,
Los Angeles County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. Unpublished
report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX A
Resumes of Key Personnel
Brian F. Smith, MA
Owner, Principal Investigator
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
14010 Poway Road Suite A
Phone: (858) 679-8218 Fax: (858) 679-9896 E-Mail: bsmith@bfsa-ca.com
Education
Master of Arts, History, University of San Diego, California 1982
Bachelor of Arts, History, and Anthropology, University of San Diego, California 1975
Professional Memberships
Society for California Archaeology
Experience
Principal Investigator 1977–Present
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. Poway, California
Brian F. Smith is the owner and principal historical and archaeological consultant for Brian F. Smith and
Associates. Over the past 32 years, he has conducted over 2,500 cultural resource studies in California,
Arizona, Nevada, Montana, and Texas. These studies include every possible aspect of archaeology
from literature searches and large-scale surveys to intensive data recovery excavations. Reports
prepared by Mr. Smith have been submitted to all facets of local, state, and federal review agencies,
including the US Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of
Reclamation, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security. In addition, Mr.
Smith has conducted studies for utility companies (Sempra Energy) and state highway departments
(CalTrans).
Professional Accomplishments
These selected major professional accomplishments represent research efforts that have added
significantly to the body of knowledge concerning the prehistoric life ways of cultures once present in
the Southern California area and historic settlement since the late 18th century. Mr. Smith has been
principal investigator on the following select projects, except where noted.
Downtown San Diego Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Programs: Large numbers of downtown San
Diego mitigation and monitoring projects, some of which included Broadway Block (2019), 915 Grape
Street (2019), 1919 Pacific Highway (2018), Moxy Hotel (2018), Makers Quarter Block D (2017), Ballpark
Village (2017), 460 16th Street (2017), Kettner and Ash (2017), Bayside Fire Station (2017), Pinnacle on the
Park (2017), IDEA1 (2016), Blue Sky San Diego (2016), Pacific Gate (2016), Pendry Hotel (2015), Cisterra
Sempra Office Tower (2014), 15th and Island (2014), Park and G (2014), Comm 22 (2014), 7th and F Street
Parking (2013), Ariel Suites (2013), 13th and Marker (2012), Strata (2008), Hotel Indigo (2008), Lofts at 707
10th Avenue Project (2007), Breeza (2007), Bayside at the Embarcadero (2007), Aria (2007), Icon (2007),
Vantage Pointe (2007), Aperture (2007), Sapphire Tower (2007), Lofts at 655 Sixth Avenue (2007),
Metrowork (2007), The Legend (2006), The Mark (2006), Smart Corner (2006), Lofts at 677 7th Avenue
(2005), Aloft on Cortez Hill (2005), Front and Beech Apartments (2003), Bella Via Condominiums (2003),
Acqua Vista Residential Tower (2003), Northblock Lofts (2003), Westin Park Place Hotel (2001), Parkloft
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2
Apartment Complex (2001), Renaissance Park (2001), and Laurel Bay Apartments (2001).
1900 and 1912 Spindrift Drive: An extensive data recovery and mitigation monitoring program at the
Spindrift Site, an important prehistoric archaeological habitation site stretching across the La Jolla
area. The project resulted in the discovery of over 20,000 artifacts and nearly 100,000 grams of bulk
faunal remains and marine shell, indicating a substantial occupation area (2013-2014).
San Diego Airport Development Project: An extensive historic assessment of multiple buildings at the
San Diego International Airport and included the preparation of Historic American Buildings Survey
documentation to preserve significant elements of the airport prior to demolition (2017-2018).
Citracado Parkway Extension: A still-ongoing project in the city of Escondido to mitigate impacts to an
important archaeological occupation site. Various archaeological studies have been conducted by
BFSA resulting in the identification of a significant cultural deposit within the project area.
Westin Hotel and Timeshare (Grand Pacific Resorts): Data recovery and mitigation monitoring program
in the city of Carlsbad consisted of the excavation of 176 one-square-meter archaeological data
recovery units which produced thousands of prehistoric artifacts and ecofacts, and resulted in the
preservation of a significant prehistoric habitation site. The artifacts recovered from the site presented
important new data about the prehistory of the region and Native American occupation in the area
(2017).
The Everly Subdivision Project: Data recovery and mitigation monitoring program in the city of El Cajon
resulted in the identification of a significant prehistoric occupation site from both the Late Prehistoric
and Archaic Periods, as well as producing historic artifacts that correspond to the use of the property
since 1886. The project produced an unprecedented quantity of artifacts in comparison to the area
encompassed by the site, but lacked characteristics that typically reflect intense occupation, indicating
that the site was used intensively for food processing (2014-2015).
Ballpark Village: A mitigation and monitoring program within three city blocks in the East Village area of
San Diego resulting in the discovery of a significant historic deposit. Nearly 5,000 historic artifacts and
over 500,000 grams of bulk historic building fragments, food waste, and other materials representing an
occupation period between 1880 and 1917 were recovered (2015-2017).
Archaeology at the Padres Ballpark: Involved the analysis of historic resources within a seven-block area
of the “East Village” area of San Diego, where occupation spanned a period from the 1870s to the
1940s. Over a period of two years, BFSA recovered over 200,000 artifacts and hundreds of pounds of
metal, construction debris, unidentified broken glass, and wood. Collectively, the Ballpark Project and
the other downtown mitigation and monitoring projects represent the largest historical archaeological
program anywhere in the country in the past decade (2000-2007).
4S Ranch Archaeological and Historical Cultural Resources Study: Data recovery program consisted of
the excavation of over 2,000 square meters of archaeological deposits that produced over one million
artifacts, containing primarily prehistoric materials. The archaeological program at 4S Ranch is the
largest archaeological study ever undertaken in the San Diego County area and has produced data
that has exceeded expectations regarding the resolution of long-standing research questions and
regional prehistoric settlement patterns.
Charles H. Brown Site: Attracted international attention to the discovery of evidence of the antiquity of
man in North America. Site located in Mission Valley, in the city of San Diego.
Del Mar Man Site: Study of the now famous Early Man Site in Del Mar, California, for the San Diego
Science Foundation and the San Diego Museum of Man, under the direction of Dr. Spencer Rogers and
Dr. James R. Moriarty.
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 3
Old Town State Park Projects: Consulting Historical Archaeologist. Projects completed in the Old Town
State Park involved development of individual lots for commercial enterprises. The projects completed
in Old Town include Archaeological and Historical Site Assessment for the Great Wall Cafe (1992),
Archaeological Study for the Old Town Commercial Project (1991), and Cultural Resources Site Survey at
the Old San Diego Inn (1988).
Site W-20, Del Mar, California: A two-year-long investigation of a major prehistoric site in the Del Mar
area of the city of San Diego. This research effort documented the earliest practice of
religious/ceremonial activities in San Diego County (circa 6,000 years ago), facilitated the projection of
major non-material aspects of the La Jolla Complex, and revealed the pattern of civilization at this site
over a continuous period of 5,000 years. The report for the investigation included over 600 pages, with
nearly 500,000 words of text, illustrations, maps, and photographs documenting this major study.
City of San Diego Reclaimed Water Distribution System: A cultural resource study of nearly 400 miles of
pipeline in the city and county of San Diego.
Master Environmental Assessment Project, City of Poway: Conducted for the City of Poway to produce
a complete inventory of all recorded historic and prehistoric properties within the city. The information
was used in conjunction with the City’s General Plan Update to produce a map matrix of the city
showing areas of high, moderate, and low potential for the presence of cultural resources. The effort
also included the development of the City’s Cultural Resource Guidelines, which were adopted as City
policy.
Draft of the City of Carlsbad Historical and Archaeological Guidelines: Contracted by the City of
Carlsbad to produce the draft of the City’s historical and archaeological guidelines for use by the
Planning Department of the City.
The Mid-Bayfront Project for the City of Chula Vista: Involved a large expanse of undeveloped
agricultural land situated between the railroad and San Diego Bay in the northwestern portion of the
city. The study included the analysis of some potentially historic features and numerous prehistoric
Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Audie Murphy
Ranch, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of 1,113.4 acres
and 43 sites, both prehistoric and historic—included project coordination; direction of field crews;
evaluation of sites for significance based on County of Riverside and CEQA guidelines; assessment of
cupule, pictograph, and rock shelter sites, co-authoring of cultural resources project report.
February- September 2002.
Cultural Resources Evaluation of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Otay Ranch Village 13
Project, San Diego County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of 1,947 acres
and 76 sites, both prehistoric and historic—included project coordination and budgeting; direction of
field crews; assessment of sites for significance based on County of San Diego and CEQA guidelines; co-
authoring of cultural resources project report. May-November 2002.
Cultural Resources Survey for the Remote Video Surveillance Project, El Centro Sector, Imperial County:
Project manager/director for a survey of 29 individual sites near the U.S./Mexico Border for proposed
video surveillance camera locations associated with the San Diego Border barrier Project—project
coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; site identification and recordation; assessment of
potential impacts to cultural resources; meeting and coordinating with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
U.S. Border Patrol, and other government agencies involved; co-authoring of cultural resources project
report. January, February, and July 2002.
Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Menifee West GPA,
Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of nine sites, both prehistoric
and historic—included project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; assessment of sites
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 4
for significance based on County of Riverside and CEQA guidelines; historic research; co-authoring of
cultural resources project report. January-March 2002.
Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed French Valley Specific Plan/EIR, Riverside
County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of two prehistoric and three historic
sites—included project coordination and budgeting; survey of project area; Native American
consultation; direction of field crews; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines;
cultural resources project report in prep. July-August 2000.
Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Menifee Ranch,
Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of one prehistoric and five
historic sites—included project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; feature
recordation; historic structure assessments; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA
guidelines; historic research; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. February-June 2000.
Salvage Mitigation of a Portion of the San Diego Presidio Identified During Water Pipe Construction for
the City of San Diego, California: Project archaeologist/director—included direction of field crews;
development and completion of data recovery program; management of artifact collections
cataloging and curation; data synthesis and authoring of cultural resources project report in prep. April
2000.
Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Tyrian 3 Project, La Jolla, California: Project
manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel—included project coordination;
assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural resources project
report. April 2000.
Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Lamont 5 Project, Pacific Beach, California:
Project manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel—included project
coordination; assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural
resources project report. April 2000.
Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Reiss Residence Project, La Jolla, California:
Project manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel—included project
coordination; assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural
resources project report. March-April 2000.
Salvage Mitigation of a Portion of Site SDM-W-95 (CA-SDI-211) for the Poinsettia Shores Santalina
Development Project and Caltrans, Carlsbad, California: Project archaeologist/ director—included
direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program; management of
artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis and authoring of cultural resources project
report in prep. December 1999-January 2000.
Survey and Testing of Two Prehistoric Cultural Resources for the Airway Truck Parking Project, Otay Mesa,
California: Project archaeologist/director—included direction of field crews; development and
completion of testing recovery program; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines;
authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. December 1999-January 2000.
Cultural Resources Phase I and II Investigations for the Tin Can Hill Segment of the Immigration and
Naturalization Services Triple Fence Project Along the International Border, San Diego County, California:
Project manager/director for a survey and testing of a prehistoric quarry site along the border—NRHP
eligibility assessment; project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; feature recordation;
meeting and coordinating with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; co-authoring of cultural resources project
report. December 1999-January 2000.
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 5
Mitigation of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Westview High School Project for the City of San
Diego, California: Project archaeologist/ director—included direction of field crews; development and
completion of data recovery program including collection of material for specialized faunal and
botanical analyses; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of
artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; co-authoring of cultural resources project
report, in prep. October 1999-January 2000.
Mitigation of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Otay Ranch SPA-One West Project for the City of
Chula Vista, California: Project archaeologist/director—included direction of field crews; development
of data recovery program; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; assessment of
site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project
report, in prep. September 1999-January 2000.
Monitoring of Grading for the Herschel Place Project, La Jolla, California: Project archaeologist/ monitor—
included monitoring of grading activities associated with the development of a single- dwelling parcel.
September 1999.
Survey and Testing of a Historic Resource for the Osterkamp Development Project, Valley Center,
California: Project archaeologist/ director—included direction of field crews; development and
completion of data recovery program; budget development; assessment of site for significance based
on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis;
authoring of cultural resources project report. July-August 1999.
Survey and Testing of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Proposed College Boulevard Alignment
Project, Carlsbad, California: Project manager/director —included direction of field crews;
development and completion of testing recovery program; assessment of site for significance based on
CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis;
authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. July-August 1999.
Survey and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the Palomar Christian Conference Center Project,
Palomar Mountain, California: Project archaeologist—included direction of field crews; assessment of
sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and
curation; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report. July-August 1999.
Survey and Evaluation of Cultural Resources at the Village 2 High School Site, Otay Ranch, City of Chula
Vista, California: Project manager/director —management of artifact collections cataloging and
curation; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; data synthesis; authoring of
cultural resources project report. July 1999.
Cultural Resources Phase I, II, and III Investigations for the Immigration and Naturalization Services Triple
Fence Project Along the International Border, San Diego County, California: Project
manager/director for the survey, testing, and mitigation of sites along border—supervision of multiple
field crews, NRHP eligibility assessments, Native American consultation, contribution to Environmental
Assessment document, lithic and marine shell analysis, authoring of cultural resources project report.
August 1997- January 2000.
Phase I, II, and II Investigations for the Scripps Poway Parkway East Project, Poway California: Project
archaeologist/project director—included recordation and assessment of multicomponent prehistoric
and historic sites; direction of Phase II and III investigations; direction of laboratory analyses including
prehistoric and historic collections; curation of collections; data synthesis; coauthorship of final cultural
resources report. February 1994; March-September 1994; September-December 1995.
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX B
Archaeological Records Search Results
(Deleted for Public Review; Bound Separately)
Cultural Resources Study for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX C
NAHC Sacred Lands File Search Results
(Deleted for Public Review; Bound Separately)
1011 N. Armando Street, Anaheim, CA 92806-2606 (714) 630-1626
October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Mr. Erik Pfahler
Borstein Enterprises
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, 8601
Mission Drive, Rosemead, California
Dear Mr. Pfahler,
Pursuant to your request, Albus & Associates, Inc. is pleased to present to you our preliminary
geotechnical investigation report, for the proposed development at the subject site. This report
presents the results of our aerial photo and literature review, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing,
and engineering analyses. Conclusions and recommendations pertaining to the proposed site
development are also presented herein based on the findings of our work.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you should have any questions regarding
the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
David E. Albus
Principal Engineer
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ........................................................................................................ 1
1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... 1
1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................. 2
2.0 INVESTIGATION .................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................ 3
2.2 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION .......................................................................................... 3
2.3 LABORATORY TESTING .................................................................................................... 3
3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 4
3.1 SOIL CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................... 4
3.2 GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 4
3.3 FAULTING ............................................................................................................................. 4
4.0 ANALYSES ............................................................................................................................... 5
4.1 SEISMICITY ........................................................................................................................... 5
4.2 STATIC SETTLEMENT ........................................................................................................ 6
5.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................... 7
5.1 FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................................... 7
5.2 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ......................................................................................................... 7
5.2.1 Ground Rupture ................................................................................................................ 7
5.2.2 Ground Shaking ................................................................................................................ 7
5.2.3 Landsliding ....................................................................................................................... 7
5.2.4 Liquefaction ...................................................................................................................... 7
5.3 STATIC SETTLEMENT ........................................................................................................ 8
5.4 EXCAVATION AND MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS .................................................. 8
5.5 SHRINKAGE AND SUBSIDENCE ....................................................................................... 8
5.6 SOIL EXPANSION ................................................................................................................. 9
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................... 9
6.1 EARTHWORK ........................................................................................................................ 9
6.1.1 General Earthwork and Grading Specifications ............................................................... 9
6.1.2 Pre-Grade Meeting and Geotechnical Observation .......................................................... 9
6.1.3 Site Clearing...................................................................................................................... 9
6.1.4 Ground Preparation ......................................................................................................... 10
6.1.5 Fill Placement ................................................................................................................. 10
6.1.6 Import Materials .............................................................................................................. 10
6.1.7 Temporary Excavations .................................................................................................. 11
6.2 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS .................................................................................... 11
6.2.1 Mapped Seismic Design Parameters ............................................................................... 11
6.2.2 Site-Specific Seismic Design Parameters ....................................................................... 12
6.3 CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN ..................................................................... 12
6.3.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 12
6.3.2 Soil Expansion ................................................................................................................ 12
6.3.3 Static and Seismic Settlement ......................................................................................... 13
6.3.4 Allowable Bearing Value ................................................................................................ 13
6.3.5 Lateral Resistance ........................................................................................................... 13
6.3.6 Footing and Slab on Grade ............................................................................................. 13
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page ii
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6.3.7 Foundation Observations ................................................................................................ 14
6.4 RETAINING AND SCREENING WALLS.......................................................................... 14
6.4.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 14
6.4.2 Allowable Bearing Value and Lateral Resistance .......................................................... 14
6.4.3 Active Earth Pressures .................................................................................................... 15
6.4.4 Drainage and Moisture-Proofing .................................................................................... 15
6.4.5 Foundation Observations ................................................................................................ 15
6.5 EXTERIOR FLATWORK .................................................................................................... 16
6.6 CONCRETE MIX DESIGN .................................................................................................. 17
6.7 CORROSION ........................................................................................................................ 17
6.8 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN ............................................................................. 17
6.8.1 Preliminary Pavement Structural Sections ...................................................................... 17
6.8.2 Subgrade Preparation ...................................................................................................... 18
6.8.3 Aggregate Base ............................................................................................................... 18
6.8.4 Asphaltic Concrete .......................................................................................................... 18
6.8.5 Concrete Paver ................................................................................................................ 18
6.8.6 Portland Cement Concrete .............................................................................................. 18
6.9 POST GRADING CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................. 19
6.9.1 Site Drainage and Irrigation ............................................................................................ 19
6.9.2 Utility Trenches .............................................................................................................. 19
6.10 PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES ................................................... 20
7.0 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 20
8.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 22
FIGURES AND PLATES
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Plate 1 - Geotechnical Map
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - EXPLORATION LOGS
Plates A-1 through A-8
APPENDIX B - LABORATORY TESTS RESULTS
Table B – Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Plate B-1 through B-2 – Grain Size Distribution Plot
Plate B-3 – Direct Shear Plot
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 1
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purposes of our preliminary geotechnical investigation were to evaluate geotechnical conditions
within the project area and to provide conclusions and recommendations relevant to the design and
construction of the proposed improvements at the subject site. The scope of this investigation included
the following:
Review of the historical aerial photographs
Review of published geologic and seismic data for the site and surrounding area
Exploratory drilling and soil sampling
Laboratory testing of selected soil samples
Engineering analyses of data obtained from our review, exploration, and laboratory testing
Evaluation of site seismicity, liquefaction potential, and settlement potential
Preparation of this report
1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The site is located at 8601 Mission Drive within the city of Rosemead, California. The APN parcel
numbers for the current development are 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. The property is bordered by
Mission Drive to the south, Walnut Grove Avenue, an existing easement for power lines, and a nursery
to the west, and single-family residences to the north and east. The location of the site and its
relationship to the surrounding areas are shown in Figure 1, Site Location Map.
The site consists of an irregularly shaped property containing approximately 3.35 acres of land. The
site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 357 to 363 feet above mean sea level (based on
Google Earth). The site slopes gently down to the south. The site is currently vacant land with some
improvements onsite. The perimeters of the site are bounded by chain-link fencing, masonry block
walls, and plastic fencing. A short concrete driveway is located to the south and west. Along the
southwest boundary of the property is existing overhead powerlines. Vegetation within the site
consists of minor ground cover and some large palm trees within the southwest portion of the site.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 2
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
© 2021 Google
N
FIGURE 1-SITE LOCATION MAP
Proposed Residential Development
8601 Mission Drive,
Rosemead, California
NOT TO SCALE
1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Based on our understanding, site development is anticipated to consist of multi-story (2 to 3), wood-
framed buildings at grade. Associated interior driveways, decorative hardscape, parking areas and
underground utilities are also anticipated.
No grading or structural plans were available in preparing this proposal. However, we anticipate some
minor cut and filling of the site will be required to achieve future surface configuration and we expect
future foundation loads will be moderate.
SITE
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 3
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2.0 INVESTIGATION
2.1 RESEARCH
We have reviewed the referenced geologic publications and maps (see references). Data from these
sources were utilized to develop some of the findings and conclusions presented herein. We have also
reviewed available historical aerial photographs. The aerial photos indicate that in 1953, the site
appears to have been graded but no improvements were constructed. By 1965, a large building had
been constructed with a driveway entering from Walnut Grove Avenue to the western side of the
building. An additional entrance from Mission drive runs to the south of the building and joins what
appears to be an asphaltic parking area occupying the areas east and north of the building. From 1965
to 1988, the site appears relatively unchanged. By 1990, the building and associated improvements
were gone and the site appears to have remained relatively unchanged since.
2.2 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
Subsurface exploration for this investigation was conducted on September 7, 2021, and consisted of
drilling six (6) soil borings to depths ranging from approximately 11.5 to 51.5 feet below the existing
ground surface (bgs). The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted, continuous flight, hollow-
stem-auger drill rig. A representative of Albus & Associates, Inc. logged the exploratory borings.
Visual and tactile identifications were made of the materials encountered, and their descriptions are
presented in the Exploration Logs in Appendix A. The approximate locations of the exploratory
excavations completed by this firm are shown on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1.
Bulk, relatively undisturbed and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samples were obtained at selected
depths within the exploratory borings for subsequent laboratory testing. Relatively undisturbed
samples were obtained using a 3-inch O.D., 2.5-inch I.D., California split-spoon soil sampler lined
with brass rings. SPT samples were obtained from the boring using a standard, unlined SPT soil
sampler. During each sampling interval, the sampler was driven 18 inches with successive drops of a
140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler
was recorded for each six inches of advancement. The total blow count for the lower 12 inches of
advancement per soil sample is recorded on the exploration log. Samples were placed in sealed
containers or plastic bags and transported to our laboratory for analyses. The borings were backfilled
with auger cuttings upon completion of sampling.
Two additional borings (P-1 and P-2) were drilled adjacent to boring B-1 for percolation testing.
Details and results of percolation tests are reported under a separate cover.
2.3 LABORATORY TESTING
Selected samples obtained from our subsurface exploration were tested in our soil laboratory. Tests
consisted of in-situ moisture content and dry density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture
content, expansion index, soluble sulfate content, direct shear, consolidation/collapse potential, grain-
size distribution analysis, Atterberg limits, passing 200, and corrosivity testing (pH, chloride, and
resistivity). A description of laboratory test criteria and test results are presented in Appendix B.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 4
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
3.1 SOIL CONDITIONS
Review of the Diblee Map for the El Monte and Baldwin Park Quadrangles shows the site is designated
as Quaternary Alluvium and falls within a flood plain and would have been subjected to seasonally-
deposited materials associated with heavy rains from nearby mountain ranges to the north. Our
exploration encounted artificial fills overlaying alluvial soils. Descriptions of the earth materials
encountered during our investigation are summarized below and are presented in detail on the
Exploration Logs presented in Appendix A.
Fills up to about 2 feet thick appear to be present on site due to previous site improvements and
grading. Fill materials typically consisted of fine to medium-grained silty sands.
Alluvium was encountered underlying the artificial fill and generally consisted of interlayered silty
sands, sands with silt, gravelly sands, and clayey sands. These materials were typically medium dense
to very dense and damp. Alluvial soils were encountered to the maximum depth explored (51.5 feet).
Within borings B-2 and B-3, cobbles were encountered at depths of approximately 10 feet. Due to the
size of the cobbles, the hollow stem could not extract all the cobbles. As such, the cobbles generally
remained within the borings and floated within the cuttings and around the stem. Sizes were either
measured or visually observed within the boring shaft and are estimated to be 4 to 6 inches in diameter.
3.2 GROUNDWATER
Groundwater was not encountered during this firm’s subsurface exploration to a depth of 51.5 feet.
The CDMG Special Report 024 suggests that historic high groundwater for the subject site is
approximately 60 feet. However, review of the Los Angeles County groundwater level data for the
nearby well 2920G indicates that groundwater for the area is 231 feet below ground surface as of 2018.
Well readings have been recorded from 5/1/1949 to 4/26/2018, and during this period, groundwater
has fluctuated, but has continued to increase in depth from 126 feet (bgs) to 231 feet (bgs) during this
time period. The last recorded reading at the time of this report was April 26, 2018 and indicated a
depth of 231 feet.
3.3 FAULTING
Based on our review of the referenced publications and seismic data, no active faults are known to
project through or immediately adjacent to the subject sites and the sites do not lie within an
“Earthquake Fault Zone” as defined by the State of California in Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Table
3.1 presents a summary of known seismically active faults within 10 miles of the sites based on the
2008 USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 5
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TABLE 3.1
Summary of Faults
Name Dist.
(miles)
Slip Rate
(mm/yr.)
Preferred
Dip
(degrees)
Slip Sense
Rupture
Top
(km)
Fault
Length
(km)
Elysian Park (Upper) 1.74 1.3 50 reverse 3 20
Raymond 2.81 1.5 79 strike slip 0 22
Verdugo 5.15 0.5 55 reverse 0 29
Sierra Madre Connected 6.11 2 51 reverse 0 76
Sierra Madre 6.11 2 53 reverse 0 57
Elsinore;W+GI+T+J+CM 6.66 n/a 84 strike slip 0 241
Elsinore;W 6.66 2.5 75 strike slip 0 46
Elsinore;W+GI 6.66 n/a 81 strike slip 0 83
Elsinore;W+GI+T 6.66 n/a 84 strike slip 0 124
Elsinore;W+GI+T+J 6.66 n/a 84 strike slip 0 199
Clamshell-Sawpit 7.75 0.5 50 reverse 0 16
Puente Hills (LA) 8.61 0.7 27 thrust 2.1 22
4.0 ANALYSES
4.1 SEISMICITY
2019 CBC requires seismic parameters in accordance with ASCE 7-16. Unless noted otherwise, all
section numbers cited in the following refer to the sections in ASCE 7-16.
Per Section 20.3 the project site was designated as Site Class D. We used the OSHPD seismic hazard
tool to obtain the basic mapped acceleration parameters, including short periods (SS) and 1-second
period (S1) MCER Spectral Response Accelerations. Section 11.4.8 requires site-specific ground
hazard analysis for structures on Site Class E with SS greater than or equal to 1.0 or Site Class D or E
with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2. Based on the mapped values of SS and S1 the project site falls
within this category, requiring site specific hazard analysis in accordance with Section 21.2.
However, “A ground motion hazard analysis is not required for structures where: Structures on Site
Class D sites with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2, provided the value of the seismic response coefficient
Cs is determined by Eq. (12.8-2) for values of T ≤ 1.5Ts and taken as equal to 1.5 times the value
computed in accordance with either Eq. (12.8-3) for TL ≥ T > 1.5Ts or Eq. (12.8-4) for T > TL.”
Assuming this exception is met for this project, a ground motion hazard analysis is not required and
mapped seismic values can be used. Should this exception not be met, a ground motion hazard analysis
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 6
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
is required to determine the Design response spectra for the proposed structures at this site. Both
mapped and site-specific seismic design parameters are provided in this report as presented in Section
6.2. Details of a ground motion hazard analysis are explained below.
According to Section 21.2.3 (Supplement 1), the site-specific Risk Targeted Maximum Considered
Earthquake (MCER) spectral response acceleration at any period is the lesser of the probabilistic and
the deterministic response accelerations, subject to the exception specified in the same section. The
probabilistic response spectrum was developed using the computer program OpenSHA (Field et al.,
2013), which implements Method 1 as described in Section 21.2.1.1. Fault Models 3.1 and 3.2 from
the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) were used as the earthquake
rupture forecast models for the PSHA. In addition to known fault sources, background seismicity was
also included in the PSHA. The ground motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) selected for use in this
analysis are those developed for the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) Next
Generation Attenuation (NGA) West 2 project. Four GMPEs - Abrahamson et al. (2014), Boore et al.
(2014), Campbell and Bozorgnia (2014), and Chiou and Youngs (2014) were used to perform the
analysis.
In accordance with Section 21.2.2 (Supplement 1), the deterministic spectral response acceleration at
each period was calculated as the 84th percentile, 5% damped response acceleration, using NGA-West2
GMPE Worksheet. For this, the information from at least three causative faults with the greatest
contribution per deaggregation analysis were used and the larger acceleration spectrum among these
was selected as the deterministic response spectrum. The deterministic spectrum was adjusted per
requirements in Section 21.2.2 (Supplement 1) where applicable. Both probabilistic and deterministic
spectra were subjected to the maximum direction scale factors specified in Section 21.2 to produce the
maximum acceleration spectra.
Design response spectrum was developed by subjecting the site-specific MCER response spectrum to
the provisions outlined in Section 21.3. This process included comparison with 80% code-based
design spectrum determined in accordance with Section 11.4.6. The short period and long period site
coefficient (Fa and Fv, respectively) were determined per Section 21.3 in conjunction with Table 11.4-
1. Site-specific design acceleration parameters (SMS, SM1, SDS, and SD1) were calculated according to
Section 21.4.
Per Section 11.2 (definitions on Page 79 of ASCE7-16) for evaluation of liquefaction, lateral
spreading, seismic settlements, and other soil-related issues, Maximum Considered Earthquake
Geometric Mean (MCEG) peak ground acceleration PGAM shall be used. The site-specific PGAM is
calculated per Section 21.5.3, as the lesser of the probabilistic PGAM (Section 21.5.1) and
deterministic PGAM (Section 21.5.2), but no less than 80% site modified peak ground acceleration,
PGAM, obtained from OSHPD seismic hazard tool. From our analyses, we obtain a PGAM of 0.762g.
4.2 STATIC SETTLEMENT
Analyses were performed for the potential settlement of the underlying soils encountered during our
investigation. The site is predominately granular in nature. As such, analyses of settlement were based
on the elastic method using estimated modulli correlated from N60 blow counts. Two analyses were
performed to evaluate settlement of the structures. The first model was based on a conventional
shallow strip footing 1.2 feet wide and a wall load of 3,000 psf. The second model was based on a
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 7
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
conventional square footing with 3 feet width and a column load of 3,000 psf. Both models yielded a
total settlement of less than 0.5 inches. Both analyses assume the upper 2 feet of existing fill soils
would be removed and replaced as compacted fill.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
5.1 FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
From a geotechnical point of view, the proposed site development is considered feasible, provided the
recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the
project. Furthermore, it is also our opinion that the proposed development will not adversely impact
the stability of adjoining properties. Key issues that could have significant fiscal impacts on the
geotechnical aspects of the proposed site development are discussed in the following sections of this
report.
5.2 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
5.2.1 Ground Rupture
No known active faults are known to project through the subject sites nor do the sites lie within the
boundaries of an “Earthquake Fault Zone” as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The closest known active fault is the Elysian Park (Upper) fault located
approximately 1.74 miles away. Therefore, potential for ground rupture due to an earthquake beneath
the sites is considered low.
5.2.2 Ground Shaking
The site is situated in a seismically active area that has historically been affected by generally moderate
to occasionally high levels of ground motion. The site lies in relatively close proximity to several
seismically active faults; therefore, during the life of the proposed improvements, the property will
probably experience similar moderate to occasionally high ground shaking from these fault zones, as
well as some background shaking from other seismically active areas of the Southern California
region. Design and construction in accordance with the current California Building Code (CBC)
requirements is anticipated to address the issues related to potential ground shaking.
5.2.3 Landsliding
Geologic hazards associated with landsliding are not anticipated at the site since the site is relatively
level.
5.2.4 Liquefaction
Engineering research of soil liquefaction potential (Youd, et al., 2001) indicates that generally three
basic factors must exist concurrently in order for liquefaction to occur. These factors include:
A source of ground shaking, such as an earthquake, capable of generating soil mass distortions.
A relatively loose silty and/or sandy soil.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 8
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
A relative shallow groundwater table (within approximately 50 feet below ground surface) or
completely saturated soil conditions that will allow positive pore pressure generation.
The site is not located within a State-designated zone of potentially liquefiable soils. Additionally,
groundwater was not encountered to the maximum depth of 51.5 feet drilled during our site
exploration. Furthermore, groundwater well measurements by the Los Angeles County in the vicinity
of the project site since 1949 indicate that groundwater has been deeper than 50 feet for more than 70
years (well 1617N). Therefore, historical high groundwater is anticipated to be deeper than 50 feet
below the ground surface. As a result, the potential for liquefaction to occur beneath the site is
considered very low.
5.3 STATIC SETTLEMENT
Analyses were performed to evaluate potential for static settlement of the underlying alluvium.
Provided site grading is performed in accordance with the recommendations provided herein and based
on the anticipated relatively light foundation loads, total and differential static settlement is not
anticipated to exceed 1 inch and ½-inch over 30 feet, respectively, for the proposed residential
structure. The estimated magnitudes of static settlements are considered within tolerable limits for the
proposed structure.
5.4 EXCAVATION AND MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Onsite earth materials are anticipated to be relatively easy to excavate with conventional heavy
earthmoving equipment. The site earth materials are generally considered suitable for reuse as fill
provided they are cleared on deleterious debris and oversized rocks (greater than 6 inches in greatest
dimension). If encountered, portions of concrete debris and asphalt can likely be reduced in size (4”
minus) and incorporated within fill soils during earthwork operations.
Temporary construction slopes will be required to complete removal of unsuitable soils and for
construction of underground utilities. Such excavations will require laybacks where they are
surcharged or where they exceed 4 feet in height.
Most of the near-surface soils are below optimum moisture content. As such, the addition of water to
these materials will be required during placement and compaction as engineered fills.
5.5 SHRINKAGE AND SUBSIDENCE
Volumetric changes in earth quantities will occur when excavated onsite soil materials are replaced as
properly compacted fill. We estimate that the existing upper 5 feet of soils will shrink approximately
8 to 14 percent when removed and replaced as compacted fill. Subsidence due to reprocessing of
removal bottoms is anticipated to be on the order of 0.10 feet. The estimates of shrinkage and
subsidence are intended as an aid for project engineers in determining earthwork quantities. However,
these estimates should be used with some caution since they are not absolute values. Contingencies
should be made for balancing earthwork quantities based on actual shrinkage and subsidence that
occurs during the grading process.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 9
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
5.6 SOIL EXPANSION
Based on our laboratory test results and the USCS visual manual classification, the near-surface soils
are generally anticipated to possess a Very Low expansion potential. As such, special requirements
as set forth in CBC Chapter 18 regarding expansive soils are not required. Additional testing for soil
expansion will be required prior to construction of foundations and other concrete work to confirm
these conditions.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 EARTHWORK
6.1.1 General Earthwork and Grading Specifications
All earthwork and grading should be performed in accordance with applicable requirements of
Cal/OSHA, applicable specifications of the Grading Codes of the City of Rosemead, California in
addition to the recommendations presented herein.
6.1.2 Pre-Grade Meeting and Geotechnical Observation
Prior to commencement of grading, we recommend a meeting be held between the developer, City
Inspector, grading contractor, civil engineer, and geotechnical consultant to discuss the proposed
grading and construction logistics. We also recommend a geotechnical consultant be retained to
provide soil engineering and engineering geologic services during site grading and foundation
construction. This is to observe compliance with the design specifications and recommendations and
to allow for design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated. If
conditions are encountered that appear to be different than those indicated in this report, the project
geotechnical consultant should be notified immediately. Design and construction revisions may be
required.
6.1.3 Site Clearing
Areas to be graded should be cleared of vegetation, existing asphalt, underground improvements to be
abandoned and deleterious materials. Existing underground utility lines within the project area that
will be protected in place and that fall within a 1 to 1 (H:V) plane projected down from the edges of
footings may be subject to surcharge loads. Under such conditions, this office should be made aware
of these conditions for evaluation of potential surcharging. Supplemental recommendations may be
required to protect such improvements in place.
The project geotechnical consultant should be notified at the appropriate times to provide observation
services during clearing operations to verify compliance with the above recommendations. Voids
created by clearing and excavation should be left open for observation by the geotechnical consultant.
Should any unusual soil conditions or subsurface structures be encountered during site clearing or
grading that are not described or anticipated herein, these conditions should be brought to the
immediate attention of the project geotechnical consultant for corrective recommendations as needed.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 10
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Temporary construction equipment (office trailers, power poles, etc.) should be positioned to allow
adequate room for clearing and recommended ground preparation to be performed for proposed
structures, pavements, and hardscapes.
6.1.4 Ground Preparation
In general, the artificial fill is considered unsuitable for support of the proposed development.
Artificial fill is estimated to typically be 2 feet thick. These materials should be removed from within
the limits of residential structures and retaining walls. The removals should extend a minimum
distance of 5 feet beyond the foundations. Artificial fill should also be removed below subgrade for
pavement and screen walls. Such removals should extend at least 2 feet beyond the edges of pavement
and footings where feasible. In addition to the general removal of existing fills, the alluvial soils
should be over-excavated to a minimum depth of 1 foot below the bottoms of footings for the
residential buildings.
The actual depth of removal should be determined by the geotechnical consultant during grading. All
removal excavations should be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant during grading to confirm the
exposed conditions are as anticipated and to provide supplemental recommendations if required.
The grading contractor should take appropriate measures when excavating adjacent any existing
improvements to remain in-place to avoid disturbing or compromising support of existing structures.
Following removals and overexcavation, the exposed grade should first be scarified to a depth of 6
inches, brought to at least 110 percent of the optimum moisture content, and then compacted to at least
90 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM D 1557).
6.1.5 Fill Placement
Materials excavated from the site may be reused as fill provided they are free of deleterious materials
and particles greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension (oversized materials). Asphaltic and
concrete debris generated during site demolition or encountered within the existing fill can be
incorporated within new fill soils during earthwork operations provided they are reduced to no more
than 4 inches in maximum dimension. Such materials should be mixed thoroughly with fill soils to
prevent nesting. All fill should be placed in lifts no greater than 8 inches in loose thickness, moisture
conditioned to at least the optimum moisture content, then compacted in place to at least 90 percent
of the laboratory standard. Each lift should be treated in a similar manner. Subsequent lifts should
not be placed until the project geotechnical consultant has approved the preceding lift.
6.1.6 Import Materials
If import materials are required to achieve the proposed finish grades, the proposed import soils should
have an Expansion Index (EI, ASTM D 4829) less than 21 and possess negligible soluble sulfate
concentrations. Import sources should be indicated to the geotechnical consultant prior to hauling the
materials to the site so that appropriate testing and evaluation of the fill materials can be performed in
advance.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 11
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6.1.7 Temporary Excavations
The upper 2 to 4 feet of site materials generally consist of silt sands that may be temporarily cut vertical
up to a maximum height of 4 feet provided they are not surcharged. Temporary excavations greater
than 4 feet or exposing friable sandy soils should be laid back at a maximum gradient of 1.5:1 (H:V)
or properly shored.
Excavations should not be left open for prolonged periods of time. The project geotechnical consultant
should observe all temporary cuts to confirm anticipated conditions and to provide alternate
recommendations if conditions dictate. All excavations should conform to the requirements of
Cal/OSHA. Based on the anticipated removal depths discussed herein and the current minimum
setback of 15 feet for buildings from property lines, we anticipate that removals can be accomplished
with open cuts. However, if deeper removals are required during grading or final building locations
are closer to property lines and thereby result in insufficient room for recommended lay back cuts,
shoring may be required. Additional recommendations for such conditions can be provided after
reviewing final site plans and during grading.
6.2 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
6.2.1 Mapped Seismic Design Parameters
For design of the project in accordance with Chapter 16 of the 2019 CBC, the mapped seismic
parameters may be taken as presented in the tables below.
TABLE 6.1
2019 CBC Mapped Seismic Design Parameters
Parameter Value
Site Class D
Mapped MCER Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SS 1.997
Mapped MCER Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, S1 0.722
Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0
Site Coefficient, Fv 1.7*
Adjusted MCER Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SMS 1.997
Adjusted MCER Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, SM1 1.227
Design Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SDS 1.331
Design Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, SD1 0.818
Long-Period Transition Period, TL (sec.) 8
Seismic Design Category for Risk Categories I-IV II
MCER = Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake
*According to Section 11.4.8 in ASCE 7-16, “a ground motion hazard analysis shall be performed in
accordance with Section 21.2 for the following structures on Site Class D and E sites with S1 greater
than or equal to 0.2.” However, “A ground motion hazard analysis is not required for structures where:
Structures on Site Class D sites with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2, provided the value of the seismic
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 12
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
response coefficient Cs is determined by Eq. (12.8-2) for values of T ≤ 1.5Ts and taken as equal to 1.5
times the value computed in accordance with either Eq. (12.8-3) for TL ≥ T > 1.5Ts or Eq. (12.8-4) for
T > TL.” The Fv value of 1.7 above from Table 11.4-2 assumes that this exception is met and that a
ground motion hazard analysis is not required. Should this exception not be met, the site-specific
seismic design parameters provided in the next section should be used.
6.2.2 Site-Specific Seismic Design Parameters
In addition to the Code Spectra parameters presented in Table 6.1, we have performed a site-specific
ground motion hazard analysis in accordance with Chapter 21 of ASCE 7-16 to obtain site-specific
seismic design acceleration parameters, the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake response
spectrum, and the design earthquake response spectrum. The site-specific seismic design parameters
are presented below.
TABLE 6.2
2019 CBC Site Specific Seismic Design Parameters
Parameter Value
Site Class D
Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0
Site Coefficient, Fv 2.5
Adjusted MCE Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SMS 1.837
Adjusted MCE Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, SM1 1.444
Design Spectral Response Acceleration, short periods, SDS 1.225
Design Spectral Response Acceleration, at 1-sec. period, SD1 1.087
MCE = Maximum Considered Earthquake
6.3 CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN
6.3.1 General
The following design parameters are provided to assist the project structural engineer to design
foundations for structures at the site. These design parameters are based on typical site materials
encountered during subsurface exploration and are provided for preliminary design and estimating
purposes. The project geotechnical consultant should provide final design parameters following
observation and testing of site materials during grading. Depending on actual materials encountered
during site grading, the design parameters presented herein may require modification.
6.3.2 Soil Expansion
The recommendations presented herein are based on soils with a Very Low expansion potential.
Following site grading, additional testing of site soils should be performed by the project geotechnical
consultant to confirm the basis of these recommendations. If site soils with higher expansion potentials
are encountered or imported to the site, the recommendations contained herein may require
modification.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 13
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6.3.3 Static and Seismic Settlement
Based on anticipated foundation loads and provided that the recommendations for ground preparation
in this report are followed, total and differential static settlement are anticipated to be less than 1 inch
and ½ inch over 30 feet, respectively. These values are considered within tolerable limits of proposed
structures and site improvements. Design of the structures should consider these maximum anticipated
settlements.
6.3.4 Allowable Bearing Value
Foundations may utilize a bearing value of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for continuous and pad
footings a minimum width of 12 inches and founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest
adjacent grade. This value may be increased by 300 psf and 800 psf for each additional foot in width
and depth, respectively, up to a maximum value of 4,000 psf. Recommended allowable bearing values
include both dead and live loads, and may be increased by one-third for wind and seismic forces.
6.3.5 Lateral Resistance
A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (psf/ft) up to a maximum
value of 1,500 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used to determine lateral bearing for footings. This
value may be increased by one-third when designing for wind and seismic forces. A coefficient of
friction of 0.48 times the dead load forces may also be used between concrete and the supporting soils
to determine lateral sliding resistance. No increase in the coefficient of friction should be used when
designing for wind and seismic forces.
The above values are based on footings placed directly against compacted fill or competent native
soils. In the case where footing sides are formed, all backfill against the footings should be compacted
to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard.
6.3.6 Footing and Slab on Grade
Exterior and interior building footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches and 12
inches, respectively, below the lowest adjacent grade. All continuous footings should be reinforced
with a minimum of two No. 4 bars, one top and one bottom. The structural engineer may require
different reinforcement and should dictate if greater than the recommendations provided herein.
Interior isolated pad footings should be a minimum of 24 inches square and founded at minimum
depths of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. Exterior isolated pad footings intended for
support of patio covers or similar construction should be a minimum of 24 inches square and founded
at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade.
Interior concrete slabs constructed on grade should be a minimum 4 inches thick and should be
reinforced with No. 3 bars spaced 30 inches on center, each way. Care should be taken to ensure the
placement of reinforcement at mid-slab height. The structural engineer may recommend a greater slab
thickness and reinforcement based on proposed use and loading conditions and such recommendations
should govern if greater than the recommendations presented herein.
Concrete floor slabs in areas to receive carpet, tile, or other moisture sensitive coverings should be
underlain with a minimum of 10-mil moisture vapor retarder conforming to ASTM E 1745-11, Class
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 14
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
A. The membrane should be properly lapped, sealed, and underlain with at least 2 inches of sand
having a SE no less than 30. One inch of this sand may be placed over the membrane to aid in the
curing of the concrete. This vapor retarder system is anticipated to be suitable for most flooring
finishes that can accommodate some vapor emissions. However, this system may emit more than 4
pounds of water per 1000 sq. ft. and therefore, may not be suitable for all flooring finishes. Additional
steps should be taken if such vapor emission levels are too high for anticipated flooring finishes.
Special consideration should be given to slabs in areas to receive ceramic tile or other rigid, crack-
sensitive floor coverings. Design and construction of such areas should mitigate hairline cracking as
recommended by the structural engineer.
Garage floor slabs should have a minimum thickness of 4 inches and should be reinforced in a similar
manner as living floor slabs. Garage floor slabs should also be poured separately from adjacent wall
footings with a positive separation maintained with 3/8-inch minimum felt expansion joint materials,
and provided with saw cuts or cold joints at a maximum spacing of 12 feet in each direction.
Consideration should be given to providing a vapor retarder below the garage slab to mitigate the
potential for effervescence on the slab surface.
Block-outs should be provided around interior columns to permit relative movement and mitigate
distress to the floor slabs due to differential settlement that will occur between column footings and
adjacent floor subgrade soils as loads are applied.
6.3.7 Foundation Observations
Foundation excavation should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant to verify that they
have been excavated into competent bearing soils and to the minimum embedment recommended
above. These observations should be performed prior to placement of forms or reinforcement. The
excavations should be trimmed neat, level and square. Loose, sloughed or moisture-softened materials
and debris should be removed prior to placing concrete.
6.4 RETAINING AND SCREENING WALLS
6.4.1 General
The following preliminary design and construction recommendations are provided for general
retaining and screen walls supported by engineered compacted fill or competent native soils. Final
wall designs specific to the site development should be provided for review once completed. The
structural engineer and architect should provide appropriate recommendations for sealing at all joints
and applying moisture-proofing material on the back of the walls.
6.4.2 Allowable Bearing Value and Lateral Resistance
Design of retaining and screen walls may utilize the bearing and lateral resistance values provided in
Section 6.3.4 and 6.3.5. The passive earth pressure for walls along property lines, where lateral
removals are likely restricted, should be reduced by 25%.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 15
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6.4.3 Active Earth Pressures
Static and seismic earth pressures for level and 2:1 (H:V) backfill conditions are provided in Table
6.3. Seismic earth pressures provided herein are based on the method provided by Seed & Whitman
(1970) using a peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.44 g for 10% probability of exceedance in 50
years. As indicated in Section 1803.5.12 of the 2019 CBC, retaining walls supporting 6 feet of backfill
or less are not required to be designed for seismic earth pressures. The values provided in the
following table do not consider hydrostatic pressure. Retaining walls should also be designed to
support adjacent surcharge loads imposed by other nearby footings or traffic loads in addition to the
earth pressure.
6.4.4 Drainage and Moisture-Proofing
Retaining walls should be constructed with a perforated pipe and gravel subdrain to prevent
entrapment of water in the backfill. The perforated pipe should consist of 4-inch-diameter, ABS SDR-
35 or PVC Schedule 40 with the perforations laid down. The pipe should be embedded in ¾- to 1½-
inch open-graded gravel wrapped in filter fabric. The gravel should be at least one foot wide and
extend at least one foot up the wall above the footing and drainage outlet. Drainage gravel and piping
should not be placed below outlets and weepholes. Filter fabric should consist of Mirafi 140N, or
equal. Outlet pipes should be directed to positive drainage devices.
The use of weepholes may be considered in locations where aesthetic issues from potential nuisance
water are not a concern. Weepholes should be 2 inches in diameter and provided at least every 6 feet
on center. Where weepholes are used, perforated pipe may be omitted from the gravel subdrain.
Retaining walls supporting backfill should also be coated with a moisture-proofing compound or
covered with such material to inhibit infiltration of moisture through the walls. Moisture-proofing
material should cover any portion of the back of wall that will be in contact with soil and should lap
over and onto the top of footing. A drainage panel should be provided between the soil backfill and
water proofing. The panel should extend from the top of the backdrain gravel up to within 12 inches
of finish grade. The top of footing should be finished smooth with a trowel to inhibit the infiltration
of water through the wall. The project structural engineer should provide specific recommendations
for moisture-proofing, water stops, and joint details.
6.4.5 Foundation Observations
Footing excavations should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant to verify that they have
been excavated into competent bearing soils and to the minimum embedment recommended herein.
These observations should be performed prior to placement of forms or reinforcement. The
excavations should be trimmed neat, level and square. Loose, sloughed or moisture-softened materials
and debris should be removed prior to placing concrete.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 16
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TABLE 6.3
SEISMIC EARTH PRESSURES
Pressure Diagram
Static Seismic Total
Component Component Force
Pressure Values
Walls Up To 10 Feet High
Value Backfill Condition
Level 2H:1V Slope
A 28H 41H
B 14H 14H
C 21H 28H
Note:
H is in feet and resulting pressure is in psf. Design may utilize either the sum of the static component and
the seismic component force diagrams or the total force diagram above. SEAOSC has suggested using a load
factor of 1.7 for the static component and 1.0 for the seismic component. The actual load factors should be
determined by the structural engineer.
6.5 EXTERIOR FLATWORK
Concrete sidewalks, patios, and similar flatwork should be a nominal 4 inches thick and provided with
saw cuts or expansion joints at spacing no greater than 10 feet in each direction. Special jointing
details should be provided in areas of block-outs, notches, or other irregularities to avoid cracking at
points of high stress.
Drainage from flatwork areas should be directed to local area drains and/or other appropriate collection
devices designed to carry runoff water to the street or other approved drainage structures. The concrete
flatwork should also be sloped at a minimum gradient of 0.5 percent away from building foundations
and retaining walls.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 17
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Subgrade soils below flatwork should be thoroughly moistened to at least 100 percent of the optimum
moisture content to a depth of 12 inches. Flooding or ponding of the subgrade is not recommended.
Moistening should be accomplished by lightly spraying the area over a period of a few days just prior
to pouring concrete. The geotechnical consultant should observe and verify the density and moisture
content of subgrade soils prior to pouring concrete to ensure that the required compaction and pre-
moistening recommendations have been met.
6.6 CONCRETE MIX DESIGN
Laboratory testing of near-surface soils for soluble sulfate content indicates soluble sulfate
concentration of 0.001%. We recommend following the procedures provided in ACI 318, Section 4.3,
Table 4.3.1 for negligible sulfate exposure. Upon completion of rough grading, an evaluation of as-
graded conditions and further laboratory testing should be completed for the site to confirm or modify
the recommendations provided in this section.
6.7 CORROSION
Results of preliminary testing of soils for pH, chloride, and minimum resistivity indicate the site is
potentially Corrosive to metals that are in contact or close proximity to onsite soils. As such, specific
recommendations should be obtained from a corrosion specialist if construction will include metals
that will be near or in direct contact with site soils.
6.8 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN
6.8.1 Preliminary Pavement Structural Sections
Based on the soil conditions present at the site and an estimated traffic index, preliminary pavement
sections are provided in the table below. An assumed “R-value” of 30 was used for the near-surface
soil in this preliminary pavement design. The sections provided below are for planning purposes only
and should be re-evaluated subsequent to site grading. Final pavement sections should be based on
actual R-value testing of in-place soils and analysis of anticipated traffic.
TABLE 6.4
PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTIONS
Location Traffic
Index
AC
(inches)
Concrete
Pavers
(mm)
PCC
(inches)
AB
(inches)
Entry Way and Drives 5.5
3.0
4.0 -- -- 8.0
5.0
-- -- 6.5 --
-- 80.0 -- 8.0
Parking Stalls -- 3.0 -- -- 4.0
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 18
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6.8.2 Subgrade Preparation
Prior to placement of paving elements, subgrade soils should be scarified 6 inches, moisture-
conditioned to above the optimum moisture content then compacted to at least 90 percent of the
maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D1557. Areas observed to pump or yield
under vehicle traffic should be removed and replaced with firm and unyielding engineered compacted
soil or aggregate base materials.
6.8.3 Aggregate Base
Aggregate base materials should be Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base
conforming to Section 200-2 of the Standard Specification for Public Works Construction
(Greenbook) or Class 2 Aggregate Base conforming to the Caltrans’ Standard Specifications. The
materials should be moisture conditioned to slightly over the optimum moisture content then
compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D 1557.
6.8.4 Asphaltic Concrete
Paving asphalt should be PG 64-10 conforming to the requirements of Section 203-1 of the Greenbook.
Asphalt concrete materials should conform to Section 203-6 and construction should conform to
Section 302 of the Greenbook.
6.8.5 Concrete Paver
Concrete pavers should conform to the requirements of ASTM C 936. Construction of the pavers,
including bedding sand, should follow manufacturer’s specifications. Typical thickness of bedding
sand is about 1 inch. The gradation of bedding sand should meet the requirement in Table 6.5.
TABLE 6.5
Gradation for Sand Bedding
Sieve Size Percent Passing
⅜” 100
No. 4 95 - 100
No. 8 80 - 100
No. 16 50 - 85
No. 30 25 - 60
No. 50 5 - 30
No. 100 0 - 10
No. 200 0 - 1
6.8.6 Portland Cement Concrete
Portland cement concrete used to construct concrete paving should conform to Section 201 of the
Greenbook and should have a minimum compressive strength of 3,250 pounds per square inch (psi)
at 28 days. Reinforcement and jointing of concrete pavement sections should be designed according
to the minimum recommendations provided by the Portland Cement Association (PCA). For rigid
pavement, transverse and longitudinal contraction joints should be provided at spacing no greater than
15 feet. Score joints may be constructed by saw cutting to a depth of ¼ of the slab thickness.
Expansion/cold joints may be used in lieu of score joints. Such joints should be properly sealed.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 19
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Where traffic will traverse over cold joints without keyways or dowels or edges of concrete paving,
the edges should be thickened by 20% of the design thickness toward the edge over a horizontal
distance of 5 feet.
6.9 POST GRADING CONSIDERATIONS
6.9.1 Site Drainage and Irrigation
The ground immediately adjacent to foundations should be provided with positive drainage away from
the structures in accordance with 2019 CBC, Section 1804.4. However, the slope of the ground surface
may be reduced to 2% based on climatic and soil conditions. No rain or excess water should be
allowed to pond against structures such as walls, foundations, flatwork, etc.
Excessive irrigation water can be detrimental to the performance of the proposed site development.
Water applied in excess of the needs of vegetation will tend to percolate into the ground. Such
percolation can lead to nuisance seepage and shallow perched groundwater. Seepage can form on
slope faces, on the faces of retaining walls, in streets, or other low-lying areas. These conditions could
lead to adverse effects such as the formation of stagnant water that breeds insects, distress or damage
of trees, surface erosion, slope instability, discoloration and salt buildup on wall faces, and premature
failure of pavement. Excessive watering can also lead to elevated vapor emissions within buildings
that can damage flooring finishes or lead to mold growth inside the home.
Key factors that can help mitigate the potential for adverse effects of overwatering include the
judicious use of water for irrigation, use of irrigation systems that are appropriate for the type of
vegetation and geometric configuration of the planted area, the use of soil amendments to enhance
moisture retention, use of low-water demand vegetation, regular use of appropriate fertilizers, and
seasonal adjustments of irrigation systems to match the water requirements of vegetation. Specific
recommendations should be provided by a landscape architect or other knowledgeable professional.
6.9.2 Utility Trenches
Trench excavations should be constructed in accordance with the recommendations contained in
Section 6.1.7 of this report. Trench excavations must also conform to the requirements of Cal/OSHA.
Trench backfill materials and compaction criteria should conform to the requirements of the local
municipalities. As a minimum, utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of
the laboratory standard. Materials placed within the pipe zone (6 inches below and 12 inches above
the pipe) should consist of particles no greater than ¾ inches and have a SE of at least 30. The materials
within the pipe zone should be moisture-conditioned and compacted by hand-operated compaction
equipment. Above the pipe zone (>1 foot above pipe), the backfill may consist of general fill materials.
Trench backfill should be moisture-conditioned to slightly over the optimum moisture content, placed
in lifts no greater than 12 inches in thickness, and then mechanically compacted with appropriate
equipment to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard. For trenches with sloped walls, backfill
material should be placed in lifts no greater than 8 inches in loose thickness, and then compacted by
rolling with a sheepsfoot roller or similar equipment. The project geotechnical consultant should
perform density testing along with probing to verify that adequate compaction has been achieved.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 20
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Within shallow trenches (less than 18 inches deep) where pipes may be damaged by heavy compaction
equipment, imported clean sand having a SE of 30 or greater may be utilized. The sand should be
placed in the trench, thoroughly watered, and then compacted with a vibratory compactor. For utility
trenches located below a 1:1 (H:V) plane projecting downward from the outside edge of the adjacent
footing base or crossing footing trenches, concrete or slurry should be used as trench backfill.
6.10 PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
We recommend Albus & Associates, Inc. be engaged to review any future development plans,
including civil plans (grading plans), foundation plans, and proposed structural loads, prior to
construction. This is to verify that the assumptions of this report are valid and that the preliminary
conclusions and recommendations contained in this report have been properly interpreted and are
incorporated into the project plans and specifications. If we are not provided the opportunity to review
these documents, we take no responsibility for misinterpretation of our preliminary conclusions and
recommendations.
We recommend that a geotechnical consultant be retained to provide soil engineering services during
construction of the project. These services are to observe compliance with the design, specifications
or recommendations, and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from
those anticipated prior to the start of construction.
If the project plans change significantly from the assumed development described herein, the project
geotechnical consultant should review our preliminary design recommendations and their applicability
to the revised construction. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be
different than those indicated in this report or subsequent design reports, the project geotechnical
consultant should be notified immediately. Design and construction revisions may be required.
7.0 LIMITATIONS
This report is based on the proposed development and geotechnical data as described herein. The
materials encountered on the project site and utilized in our laboratory testing for this investigation
are believed representative of the total project area, and the conclusions and recommendations
contained in this report are presented on that basis. However, soil and bedrock materials can vary in
characteristics between points of exploration, both laterally and vertically, and those variations could
affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. As such, observation and testing by a
geotechnical consultant during the grading and construction phases of the project are essential to
confirming the basis of this report.
This report has been prepared consistent with that level of care being provided by other professionals
providing similar services at the same locale and time period. The contents of this report are
professional opinions and as such, are not to be considered a guaranty or warranty.
This report should be reviewed and updated after a period of one year or if the site ownership or project
concept changes from that described herein.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 21
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Borstein Enterprises and their project
consultants in the planning and design of the proposed development. This report has not been prepared
for use by parties or projects other than those named or described herein. This report may not contain
sufficient information for other parties or other purposes.
This report is subject to review by the controlling governmental agency.
Respectfully submitted,
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Eung Jin Jeon, Ph.D. David E. Albus
Associate Engineer Principal Engineer
G.E. 3097 G.E. 2455
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 22
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
8.0 REFERENCES
Publications
Abrahamson, N.A., Silva, W.J., and Kamai, R. 2014., “Update of the AS08 Ground-Motion Prediction
Equations Based on the NGA-West2 Data Set.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1179-1197.
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for
Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-16.
Boore, D.M., Stewart, J.P., Seyhan, E., and Atkinson, G.M., 2014. “NGA-West2 Equations for
Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes.” Earthquake
Spectra 30 (3): 1057-1085.
Dibblee, T.W., Jr. 1999. Geologic map of the El Monte and Baldwin Park quadrangles, Los Angeles,
California: Dibblee Geological Foundation, Map DF-69, scale 1:24,000.
California Geologic Survey, 2008. Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in
California, Special Publication 117A.
California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1998. “Seismic Hazard Zone
Report for the Whittier 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angles and Orange Counties, California.”
Seismic Hazard Report 037.
Campbell, K.W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2014. “NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average
Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped Linear Acceleration Response Spectra.”
Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1087-1115.
Chiou, B.S.-J., and Youngs, R.R., 2014. “Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA Model for the
Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra, Earthquake
Spectra, 30 (3): 1117-1153.
Field, E.H., Biasi, G.P., Bird, P., Dawson, T.E., Felzer, K.R., Jackson, D.D., Johnson, K.M., Jordan,
T.H., Madden, C., Michael, A.J., Milner, K.R., Page, M.T., Parsons, T., Powers, P.M., Shaw,
B.E., Thatcher, W.R., Weldon, R.J., II, and Zeng, Y., 2013, Uniform California earthquake
rupture forecast, version 3 (UCERF3)—The time-independent model: U.S. Geological Survey
Open-File Report 2013–1165, 97 p., California Geological Survey Special Report 228, and
Southern California Earthquake Center Publication 1792, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1165/.
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Well Data (accessed 2020):
https://dpw.lacounty.gov/general/wells/
Seed, H.B., and Whitman, R.V., 1970. “Design of Earth Retaining Structures for Dynamic Loads,”
ASCE Specialty Conference, Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth Retaining
Structures, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York, 103-147.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
Page 23
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
REFERENCES (cont.)
Youd, T.L., Idriss, I.M., Andrus, R.D., Arango, I., Castro, G., Christian, J., Dobry, R., Finn, W.D.L.,
Harder, L.F., Hynes, M.E., Ishihara, K., Koester, J.P., Liao, S.S.C., Marcuson, W.F., Martin, G.R.,
Mitchell, J.K., Moriwaki, Y., Power, M.S., Robertson, P.K., Seed, R.B., and Stokoe, K.H. 2001.
“Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998
NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils.” ASCE Journal of
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 127 (10): 817-833.
APPROXIMATEPROJECT SITE LIMITSB-1P-2P-1B-2B-3B-4B-5B-6EXPLANATION(Locations Approximate)0 50 100 200APPROX SCALE : 1" = 100'- Exploratory Boring- Percolation Test Boring1Plate:Date: 10/27/20213016.00Job No.:GEOTECHNICAL MAP©Google 2021
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX A
EXPLORATION LOGS
Field Identification Sheet
Light gray Description Order:
Description, Color, Moisture, Density, Grain Size, Additional Description
Gray Description %
0-5
trace 5-15
Dark gray with 15-30
30+Gravelly Sand with Silt trace Clay
Moisture Silty Clay with Sand trace Gravel
Gray Brown Dry
Damp
Moist
Light brown Very Moist
Wet
Brown Density (Navfac)
SPT CA
0-3 0-5
Dark Brown 3-8 5-13
8-14 13-22
14-25 22-40
Olive brown 25> 40>
2< 0-3
Olive 2-4 3-6
4-8 6-13
8-15 13-24
Yellow 15-30 24-48
30> 48>
Yellowish brown Grain Size
Description Sieve Size Approx. Size
>12" Larger than basketball
Yellowish red 3-12" Fist to basketball
coarse 3/4-3" Thumb to Fist
fine #4-3/4" Pea to Thumb
Red coarse #10-4 Rock Salt to Pea
medium #40-10 Sugar to Rock Salt
fine #200-40 Flour to Sugar
Reddish Brown Pass #200 Smaller than Flour
Additional Description (ie. roots, pinhole pores, debris, etc.)
Tan Trace 5% Moderate 15% Abundant 30%
Albus & Associates, Inc. Plate A-0
absence of water
near optimum
below optimum
Very Loose
Sand
Sand trace Silt
Sand with Silt
Silty Sand
Example
Very Soft
Soft
Stiff
above optimum
free water visible
Loose
Medium Dense
More Examples
Fines
Sand
Gravel
Sand with Silt and Clay
Sand trace Silt and Clay
Sand with Silt trace Clay
Very Stiff
Hard
Fine grained soils
Medium Stiff
Boulders
Cobbles
Dense
Coarse grained soils
Very Dense
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
WaterCoreBulk5
10
15
20
EXPLANATION
Solid lines separate geologic units and/or material types.
Dashed lines indicate unknown depth of geologic unit change or
material type change.
Solid black rectangle in Core column represents California
Split Spoon sampler (2.5in ID, 3in OD).
Double triangle in core column represents SPT sampler.
Vertical Lines in core column represents Shelby sampler.
Solid black rectangle in Bulk column respresents large bag
sample.
Other Laboratory Tests:
Max = Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content
EI = Expansion Index
SO4 = Soluble Sulfate Content
DSR = Direct Shear, Remolded
DS = Direct Shear, Undisturbed
SA = Sieve Analysis (1" through #200 sieve)
Hydro = Particle Size Analysis (SA with Hydrometer)
200 = Percent Passing #200 Sieve
Consol = Consolidation
SE = Sand Equivalent
Rval = R-Value
ATT = Atterberg Limits
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-1
358
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
15
20
25
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM):Light brown, dry, fine to medium grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Sand with Gravel trace Silt (SP):Brown to yellowish brown,
damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand
Sand with Gravel (SP):Yellowish brown, damp to moist,
medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand
Gravelly Sand (SW):Yellowish brown, damp to moist, medium
dense, fine to coarse grained sand
@ 10 ft, more coarse grained sand
@ 15 ft, dry to damp, very dense
Silty Sand (SM):Brown to yellowish brown, moist, very dense,
fine grained sand
@ 20 ft, medium dense
Sand with Gravel trace Silt (SP):Brown, moist, dense, more fine
grained sand
34
37
17
10
21
20
28
3.6
2.9
3.2
2.6
117.4
112.4
103.9
112.8
Max EI
SO4 DS
pH Resist
Ch
SA Hydro
200
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-2
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-1
358
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
35
40
45
50
Yellowish brown, very dense, more fine to coarse grained sand
Gravelly Sand (SP):Light reddish brown, dry to damp, very
dense, fine to coarse grained sand
Sand with Silt (SP):Light reddish brown, damp to moist, very
dense, fine grained sand
Silty Sand (SM):Light reddish brown, damp to moist, very
dense, fine grained sand, moderate fines
Clayey Sand (SC):Brown to reddish brown, moist, hard, fine
grained sand
Total Depth 51.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
52
49
36
61
30
SA Hydro
200
200
ATT
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-3
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-2
357.9
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine
to coarse grained sand
Gravelly Sand (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, medium dense,
fine to coarse grained sand
@ 6 ft, dense, gravel up to 1 inch dia
@ 10 ft, medium dense, cobbles observed in cuttings up to 6
inch dia
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
15
28
25
30
2.7
3.3 112.4
200
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-4
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-3
357.9
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Gravelly Sand trace Silt (SP): Yellowish brown, dry to damp,
medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand
@ 4 ft, damp, loose, no silt, gravel up to 1 inch dia
@ 6 ft, moist, medium dense
@ 10 ft, 4 inch dia cobble observed in cuttings
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
19
12
27
2.3
3.1
3.4
104.9
109.8 Consol
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-5
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-4
358
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, moist, loose, fine to coarse
grained sand
Sand with Gravel (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, loose, fine to
coarse grained sand
@ 6 ft, medium dense
@ 10 ft, more coarse grained sand
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
31
15
13
17
3.7
3.8
2.8
4.5
112.9
107.2
105.9 Consol
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-6
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-5
361
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine
to medium grained sand
@ 4 ft, Yellowish brown
Sand with Gravel (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, medium
dense, fine to coarse grained sand
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
17
20
34
3.4
4.6
3.1
108.7
-31.3
111.1
200
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-7
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-6
361.2
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine
to coarse grained sand
Gravelly Sand (SP): Yellowish brown, damp, loose, fine to
coarse grained sand
@ 6 ft, medium dense, more coarse grained sand
@ 10 ft, dense, more gravel 46
16
15
24
3.4
2.1
2.4
2.4
103.2
108.5
109.8
200
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-8
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
Soil Classification
Soils encountered within the exploratory borings were initially classified in the field in general
accordance with the visual-manual procedures of the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D
2488). The samples were re-examined in the laboratory and classifications reviewed and then revised
where appropriate. The assigned group symbols are presented on the Exploration Logs provided in
Appendix A.
In-Situ Moisture Content and Dry Density
Moisture content and dry density of in-place soil materials were determined in representative strata.
Test data are summarized on the Exploration Logs, Appendix A.
Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content
Maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were performed on a representative sample of
the site materials obtained from our field explorations. The test was performed in accordance with
ASTM D 1557. Pertinent test values are given in Table B-1.
Expansion Potential
Expansion index testing was performed on a selected sample. The test was performed in accordance
with ASTM D4829. The test result and expansion potential are presented on Table B-1.
Soluble Sulfate Content
A chemical analysis was performed on a selected sample to determine soluble sulfate content. This
test was performed in our soil laboratory in accordance with California Test Method No 417. The test
result is included on Table B-1.
Atterberg Limits
Atterberg Limits (Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index) were performed in accordance
with Test Method ASTM D 4318. Pertinent test values are presented within Table B-1.
Particle Size Analyses
Particle size analyses were performed on representative samples of site materials in accordance with
ASTM D 422. The results are presented graphically on the attached Plates B-1 and B-2.
Direct Shear
The Coulomb shear strength parameters, angle of internal friction and cohesion, were determined for
a bulk sample and intact samples obtained from one our borings. The tests were performed in general
conformance with Test Method ASTM D 3080. The bulk sample was remolded to 90 percent of
maximum dry density and at the optimum moisture content. Three specimens were prepared for each
test, artificially saturated, and then sheared under varied loads at an appropriate constant rate of strain.
Results are graphically presented on Plate B-3.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021 J.N.: 3016.00
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Corrosion
Select samples were tested for minimum resistivity, chloride, pH in accordance with California Test
Method 643. Results of these tests are provided in Table B-1.
TABLE B-1
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Boring
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft)
Soil Description Test Results
B-1 0-5 Silty Sand with Gravel
Max. Dry Density (pcf):
Opt. Moisture Content (%):
Expansion Index:
Expansion Potential:
Soluble Sulfate Content:
Sulfate Exposure:
PH:
Chloride content (ppm):
Resistivity (ohms):
132.5
6.5
0
Very Low
0.005%
Negligible
6.86
75
3900
B-1 20 Silty Sand Passing No. 200 Sieve: 43.4
B-1 35 Gravelly Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 11.1
B-1 45 Sand with Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 17.7
B-1 50 Sandy Clay with Silt
Liquid Limit (%):
Plasticity Index (%):
25
7.2
B-2 10 Gravelly Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 10.7
B-5 10 Gravelly Sand with Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 20.3
B-6 4 Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 6.2
Note: Additional laboratory test results are provided on the boring logs provided in Appendix A.
COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
Description
Sand with Gravel trace Silt
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-1
3016.00
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Job Number Location
B-1
GRAVELCOBBLES SILT AND CLAYSAND
15
Depth
6"3"1.5"3/4"3/8"4 10 20 40 60 100 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.00010.0010.010.1110100
U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes
Percent RetainedPercent PassingGrain Size in Millimeters
COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
Description
Sand with Gravel trace Silt
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-2
3016.00
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Job Number Location
B-1
GRAVELCOBBLES SILT AND CLAYSAND
30
Depth
6"3"1.5"3/4"3/8"4 10 20 40 60 100 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.00010.0010.010.1110100
U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes
Percent RetainedPercent PassingGrain Size in Millimeters
CONSOLIDATION
Job Number Location Depth
3016.00 B-3 6
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-3
Description
Sand
102.5 4 18.2
Initial Dry Density (pcf)Initial Moisture Content (%)Final Moisture Concent (%)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
100 1000 10000 100000CONSOLIDATION (%)NORMAL STRESS (psf)
Field Saturated
CONSOLIDATION
Job Number Location Depth
3016.00 B-4 6
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-4
Description
Sand
106.5 4.9 18.7
Initial Dry Density (pcf)Initial Moisture Content (%)Final Moisture Concent (%)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
100 1000 10000 100000CONSOLIDATION (%)NORMAL STRESS (psf)
Field Saturated
DIRECT SHEAR
Sample Type:
Normal Stress (ksf)1 2 4
Peak Shear Stress (ksf)0.924 2.256 4.416
Peak Displacement (in)0.02 0.022 0.023
Ultimate Shear Stress (ksf)0.552 1.704 3.408
Ultimate Displacement (in)0.24 0.25 0.25
Initial Dry Density (pcf)124.5 124.5 124.5
Initial Moisture Content (%)2 2 2
Final Moisture Content (%)7.2 7.1 6.7
Strain Rate (in/min)
Job Number Location Depth
3016.00 B-1 0-5
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-5
Description
Silty Sand with Gravel
0.05
Saturated, Remolded
-0.005
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0 2 4 6 8 10
Vertical Displacement (in)Strain (%)
1 2 4
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Shear Stress (ksf)Strain (%)
1 2 4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5SHEAR STRESS (ksf)NORMAL STRESS (ksf)
Peak
Ultimate
Linear (Peak)
Linear (Ultimate)
PALEONTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR
THE 8601 MISSION DRIVE PROJECT
CITY OF ROSEMEAD,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APNs 5389-009-029, -30, and -031
Prepared on Behalf of:
Borstein Enterprises
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820
Los Angeles, California 90025
Prepared for:
City of Rosemead
8838 East Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
Prepared by:
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064
March 7, 2022
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Paleontological Database Information
Author: Todd A. Wirths, M.S., Senior Paleontologist, California
Professional Geologist No. 7588
Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064
(858) 679-8218
Report Date: March 7, 2022
Report Title: Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project,
City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California
Prepared on Behalf of: Borstein Enterprises
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820
Los Angeles, California 90025
Prepared for: City of Rosemead
8838 East Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
Prepared by: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064
Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 5389-009-029, -030, and -031
USGS Quadrangle: Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 11 West, on the USGS El
Monte, California Quadrangle (7.5-minute)
Study Area: 3.38 acres
Key Words: City of Rosemead; Paleontological assessment; Holocene
alluvial fan deposits; Low sensitivity; no monitoring
recommended.
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
Section Page
I. INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION .........................................................................1
II. REGULATORY SETTING .........................................................................................1
State of California .....................................................................................................1
City of Rosemead ........................................................................................................4
III. GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................4
IV. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES........................................................................4
Definition ....................................................................................................................4
Fossil Locality Search ................................................................................................6
V. PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY ........................................................................6
Overview .....................................................................................................................6
Professional Standards ..............................................................................................6
Field Survey ................................................................................................................7
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................7
Paleontological MMRP..............................................................................................8
VII. CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................10
VIII. REFERENCES..........................................................................................................10
Appendices
Appendix A – Qualifications of Key Personnel
Appendix B – Paleontological Records Search
List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 1 General Location Map .................................................................................2
Figure 2 Project Location Map ...................................................................................3
Figure 3 Geologic Map ...............................................................................................5
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1
I. INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION
A paleontological resource assessment has been completed for the 8601 Mission Drive
Project, located northeast of the intersection of Mission Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue in
Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California (Figures 1 and 2). The 3.36-acre project occupies
three parcels (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 5389-009-029, -030, and -031). On the United States
Geological Survey 7.5-minute, 1:24,000-scale El Monte, California topographic quadrangle map,
the project is located in unsectioned Township 1 South, Range 11 West (projected), San
Bernardino Baseline and Meridian (see Figure 2). The project will include the construction of 37
single-family residential lots with associated landscaping and infrastructure. Currently, the
subject property is vacant.
As the lead agency, the City of Rosemead has required the preparation of a
paleontological assessment to evaluate the project’s potential to yield paleontological resources.
The paleontological assessment of the project included a review of paleontological literature and
fossil locality records in the area; a review of the underlying geology; and recommendations to
mitigate impacts to potential paleontological resources, if necessary.
II. REGULATORY SETTING
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which is patterned after the National
Environmental Policy Act, is the overriding environmental regulation that sets the requirement
for protecting California’s paleontological resources. CEQA mandates that governing permitting
agencies (lead agencies) set their own guidelines for the protection of nonrenewable
paleontological resources under their jurisdiction.
State of California
Under “Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA,” as amended in December 2018
(California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 et seq.),
procedures define the types of activities, persons, and public agencies required to comply with
CEQA. Section 15063 of the CCR provides a process by which a lead agency may review a
project’s potential impact to the environment, whether the impacts are significant, and provide
recommendations, if necessary.
In CEQA’s Environmental Checklist Form, one of the questions to answer is, “Would the
project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?” (Appendix G, Section VII, Part f). This is to ensure compliance with California Public
Resources Code Section 5097.5, the law that protects nonrenewable resources, including fossils:
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4
a) A person shall not knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy,
injure or deface any historic or prehistoric ruins, burial grounds,
archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized
footprints, inscriptions made by human agency, rock art, or any other
archaeological, paleontological or historical feature, situated on public lands,
except with the express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction
over such lands.
b) As used in this section, “public lands” means lands owned by, or under the
jurisdiction of, the state, or any city, county, district, authority, or public
corporation, or any agency thereof.
c) A violation of this section is a misdemeanor.
City of Rosemead
The General Plan Update of the City of Rosemead does not discuss paleontological
resources (City of Rosemead 2010).
III. GEOLOGY
The project is located within the San Gabriel Valley Basin of the larger Los Angeles
Basin, a large structural sedimentary basin bounded and cut through by several active fault
systems in the Los Angeles metropolitan area (Hillhouse et al. 2002). The concrete-lined Rubio
Wash, a tributary to the Rio Hondo, flows southward approximately a quarter mile east of the
project. As mapped by Tan (1998), the project is underlain by unconsolidated Holocene sandy
and gravelly young alluvial fan and valley deposits (pale tan and yellow areas labeled “Qyfa”
and “Qyfag,” respectively, on Figure 3).
IV. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Definition
Paleontological resources are the remains of prehistoric life that have been preserved in
geologic strata. These remains are called fossils and include bones, shells, teeth, and plant
remains (including their impressions, casts, and molds) in the sedimentary matrix, as well as
trace fossils such as footprints and burrows. Fossils are considered older than 5,000 years of age
(Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 2010) but may include younger remains (subfossils), for
example, when viewed in the context of local extinction of the organism or habitat. Fossils are
considered a nonrenewable resource under state and local guidelines (see Section II of this
report).
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6
Fossil Locality Search
A prior paleontological locality and records search was performed for the nearby 12247
Elliott Avenue Project by the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) (Bell
2021 [Appendix B]). The 12247 Elliott Avenue Project is located in El Monte, approximately
four miles southeast of the current project, and covered an area several miles distant. The
records search indicates that no fossil localities were identified within the current project
boundaries or within a five-mile radius. The closest-known fossil localities are located at the
Puente Hills Landfill, about five-and-a-half to six miles southeast of the 8601 Mission Drive
Project, consisting of Pleistocene-age marine vertebrates and invertebrates (LACM VP 6350-
6362; LACM IP 16968-16991). The nearest terrestrial Pleistocene locality is identified near
Monterey Pass Road, about six miles to the southwest, just southwest of Monterey Park (LACM
VP 3363). Other, more distant localities are summarized in the records search in Appendix B.
A review of published and unpublished literature was conducted for potential
paleontological resources that are known in the vicinity of the project. The sources reviewed,
Miller (1971) and Jefferson (1991), did not indicate the presence of any known fossil localities
within or nearby the project.
V. PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY
Overview
The degree of paleontological sensitivity of any particular area is based on a number of
factors, including the documented presence of fossiliferous resources on a site or in nearby areas,
the presence of documented fossils within a particular geologic formation or lithostratigraphic
unit, and whether or not the original depositional environment of the sediments is one that might
have been conducive to the accumulation of organic remains that might have become fossilized
over time. Holocene alluvium is generally considered to be geologically too young to contain
significant nonrenewable paleontological resources (i.e., fossils), and is therefore typically
assigned a low paleontological sensitivity. Pleistocene (more than 11,700 years old) alluvial and
alluvial fan deposits in the Los Angeles Basin, however, often yield important Ice Age terrestrial
vertebrate fossils, such as extinct mammoths, mastodons, giant ground sloths, extinct species of
horse, bison, and camel, saber-toothed cats, and others (Jefferson 1991). These Pleistocene
sediments are accorded a high paleontological resource sensitivity.
Professional Standards
The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology has drafted guidelines that include four
categories of paleontological sensitivity for geologic units (formations) that might be impacted
by a proposed project, as listed below:
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7
• High Potential: Rock units from which vertebrate or significant invertebrate, plant,
or trace fossils have been recovered.
• Undetermined Potential: Rock units for which little information is available
concerning their paleontological content, geologic age, and depositional environment;
further study is needed to determine the potential of the rock unit.
• Low Potential: Rock units that are poorly represented by fossil specimens in
institutional collections or based on a general scientific consensus that only preserve
fossils in rare circumstances.
• No Potential: Rock units that have no potential to contain significant paleontological
resources, such as high-grade metamorphic rocks and plutonic igneous rocks.
Under these criteria, a low potential may be assigned to the surface geology mapped
project, based on the lack of significant fossil localities and Pleistocene deposits near the project.
Field Survey
BFSA staff conducted a pedestrian survey on February 18, 2022 under the direction of
Principal Investigator Todd A. Wirths. The project is flat and appeared to be previously graded;
remnants of an old asphalt driveway remain. The majority of the ground surface was covered
with short grasses and weeds, with several palm trees present. No paleontological resources
were identified during the field survey.
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Research has confirmed the existence of Holocene young alluvial fan and valley deposits
that are mapped at the surface of the project. Based on the lack of known significant fossil
localities nearby and a low sensitivity rating typically assigned to Holocene-aged young alluvial
deposits for yielding paleontological resources, it is recommended that paleontological
monitoring not be implemented during mass grading and excavation activities, since impacts to
potential paleontological resources are considered to be less than significant without mitigation.
Monitoring for paleontological resources does not appear warranted at the project.
However, should paleontological resources be discovered at any time during earth
disturbance activities at the project, a paleontological Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (MMRP) is provided below. Paleontological monitoring may be reduced or increased
based on the observations and recommendations of the professional-level project paleontologist.
The following MMRP, when implemented, would reduce potential impacts of paleontological
resources to a level below significant:
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8
Paleontological MMRP
1. If paleontological resources (fossils) are discovered, earth disturbance activities
should stop, and the fossil location shall be protected and cordoned off at a distance
of 50 feet in all directions. A qualified paleontologist should be notified immediately
to determine the significance of the discovery. After examination of the fossil(s), and
if the paleontologist determines the fossil(s) to be significant, monitoring for
paleontological resources may be warranted. The guidelines and procedures for
monitoring are detailed below.
2. Monitoring of mass grading and excavation activities in areas identified as likely to
contain paleontological resources shall be performed by the paleontological monitor.
Monitoring will be conducted in areas of grading or excavation in undisturbed
sediments. The duration of monitoring shall be determined by the qualified project
paleontologist.
3. Paleontological monitors will be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to
avoid construction delays. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or
divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens in a timely
manner. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units are not
present in the subsurface, or, if present, are determined upon exposure and
examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain
fossil resources. The monitor shall notify the project paleontologist, who will then
notify the concerned parties of the discovery.
4. Paleontological salvage during trenching and boring activities is typically from the
generated spoils and does not delay the trenching or drilling activities. Fossils are
collected and placed in cardboard flats or plastic buckets and identified by field
number, collector, and date collected. Notes are taken on the map location and
stratigraphy of the site, which is photographed before it is vacated, and the fossils are
removed to a safe place. On mass grading projects, discovered fossil sites are
protected by flagging to prevent them from being overrun by earthmovers (scrapers)
before salvage begins. Fossils are collected in a similar manner, with notes and
photographs being taken before removing the fossils. Precise location of the site is
determined with the use of handheld GPS units. If the site involves remains from a
large terrestrial vertebrate, such as large bone(s) or a mammoth tusk, that is/are too
large to be easily removed by a single monitor, a fossil recovery crew shall excavate
around the find, encase the find within a plaster and burlap jacket, and remove it after
the plaster is set. For large fossils, use of the contractor’s construction equipment
may be solicited to help remove the jacket to a safe location.
5. Isolated fossils are collected by hand, wrapped in paper, and placed in temporary
collecting flats or five-gallon buckets. Notes are taken on the map location and
stratigraphy of the site, which is photographed before it is vacated, and the fossils are
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9
removed to a safe place.
6. Particularly small invertebrate fossils typically represent multiple specimens of a
limited number of organisms, and a scientifically suitable sample can be obtained
from one to several five-gallon buckets of fossiliferous sediment. If it is possible to
dry screen the sediment in the field, a concentrated sample may consist of one or two
buckets of material. For vertebrate fossils, the test is usually the observed presence of
small pieces of bones within the sediments. If present, multiple five-gallon buckets
of sediment can be collected and returned to a separate facility to wet-screen the
sediment.
7. In the laboratory, individual fossils are cleaned of extraneous matrix, any breaks are
repaired, and the specimen, if needed, is stabilized by soaking in an archivally
approved acrylic hardener (e.g., a solution of acetone and Paraloid B-72).
8. Recovered specimens are prepared to a point of identification and permanent
preservation (not display), including screen-washing sediments to recover small
invertebrates and vertebrates. Preparation of individual vertebrate fossils is often
more time-consuming than for accumulations of invertebrate fossils.
9. Identification and curation of specimens into a professional, accredited public
museum repository with a commitment to archival conservation and permanent
retrievable storage (e.g., LACM) shall be conducted. The paleontological program
should include a written repository agreement prior to the initiation of mitigation
activities. Prior to curation, the lead agency (e.g., the City of Rosemead) will be
consulted on the repository/museum to receive the fossil material.
10. A final monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance will be
prepared, including lists of all fossils recovered and necessary maps and graphics to
accurately record their original location(s). The report, when submitted to, and
accepted by, the appropriate lead agency, will signify satisfactory completion of the
project program to mitigate impacts to any potential nonrenewable paleontological
resources (i.e., fossils) that might have been lost or otherwise adversely affected
without such a program in place.
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10
VII. CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present
the data and information required for this paleontological report, and that the facts, statements,
and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and have
been compiled in accordance with CEQA criteria.
March 7, 2022
Todd A. Wirths Date
Senior Paleontologist
California Professional Geologist No. 7588
VIII. REFERENCES
Bell, Alyssa. 2021. Paleontological resources for the 12247 Elliott Avenue Project. Natural
History Museum of Los Angeles County. Prepared for Brian F. Smith and Associates,
Inc., Poway, California.
City of Rosemead. 2010. City of Rosemead general plan update. Electronic document,
https://www.cityofrosemead.org/government/city_departments/community_development/
planning, accessed March 3, 2022.
Hillhouse, J.W., Reichard, E.G., and Ponti, D.J. 2002. Probing the Los Angeles Basin – Insights
into ground-water resources and earthquake hazards. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet
086-02. Electronic document, https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs086-02/fs086-02.pdf,
accessed March 3, 3033.
Jefferson, G.T. 1991. A catalogue of late Quaternary vertebrates from California: Part two,
mammals. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Technical Reports, no. 7:I–
v + 1–129.
Miller, W.E. 1971. Pleistocene vertebrates of the Los Angeles Basin and vicinity (exclusive of
Rancho La Brea). Bulletin of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History;
Science (Number 10, 124 pp.).
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2010. Standard procedures for the assessment and
mitigation of adverse impacts to paleontological resources; by the SVP Impact Mitigation
Guidelines Revision Committee. Electronic document, http://vertpaleo.org/Membership/
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11
Member-Ethics/SVP_Impact_Mitigation_Guidelines.aspx, accessed March 3, 2022.
Tan, S.S. 1998a. Geologic map of the El Monte 7.5' quadrangle, Los Angeles County,
California: a digital database. California Division of Mines and Geology Open-file report
98-29.
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX A
Qualifications of Key Personnel
To dd A. W ir ths , MS, PG No. 7588
Senior Paleontologist
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
14010 Poway Road Suite A
Phone: (858) 679-8218 Fax: (858) 679-9896 E-Mail: twirths@bfsa-ca.com
Education
Master of Science, Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, California 1995
Bachelor of Arts, Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz 1992
Professional Certifications
California Professional Geologist #7588, 2003
Riverside County Approved Paleontologist
San Diego County Qualified Paleontologist
Orange County Certified Paleontologist
OSHA HAZWOPER 40-hour trained; current 8-hour annual refresher
Professional Memberships
Board member, San Diego Geological Society
San Diego Association of Geologists; past President (2012) and Vice President (2011)
South Coast Geological Society
Southern California Paleontological Society
Experience
Mr. Wirths has more than a dozen years of professional experience as a senior-level paleontologist
throughout southern California. He is also a certified California Professional Geologist. At BFSA, Mr.
Wirths conducts on-site paleontological monitoring, trains and supervises junior staff, and performs all
research and reporting duties for locations throughout Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside,
Orange, San Diego, and Imperial Counties. Mr. Wirths was formerly a senior project manager
conducting environmental investigations and remediation projects for petroleum hydrocarbon-
impacted sites across southern California.
Selected Recent Reports
2019 Paleontological Assessment for the 10575 Foothill Boulevard Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga,
San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning, Inc. Report on file at Brian F.
Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2019 Paleontological Assessment for the MorningStar Marguerite Project, Mission Viejo, Orange
County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates,
Inc., Poway, California.
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2
2019 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Nimitz Crossing Project, City of San Diego. Prepared
for Voltaire 24, LP. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2019 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the Jack Rabbit Trail Logistics
Center Project, City of Beaumont, Riverside County, California. Prepared for JRT BP 1, LLC.
Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Oceanside Beachfront Resort Project, Oceanside, San
California. Prepared for S.D. Malkin Properties. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates,
Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Nakase Project, Lake Forest, Orange
County, San California. Prepared for Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. Report on file at Brian F.
Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Sunset Crossroads Project, Banning,
Riverside County. Prepared for NP Banning Industrial, LLC. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and
Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Assessment for the Ortega Plaza Project, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County.
Prepared for Empire Design Group. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.,
Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Resource Record Search Update for the Green River Ranch III Project, Green River
Ranch Specific Plan SP00-001, City of Corona, California. Prepared for Western Realco. Report
on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Assessment for the Cypress/Slover Industrial Center Project, City of Fontana, San
Bernardino County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith
and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Imperial Landfill Expansion Project (Phase VI,
Segment C-2), Imperial County, California. Prepared for Republic Services, Inc. Report on file at
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2021 Paleontological Assessment for the Manitou Court Logistics Center Project, City of Jurupa Valley,
Riverside County, California. Prepared for Link Industrial. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and
Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2021 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Del Oro (Tract 36852) Project,
Menifee, Riverside County. Prepared for D.R. Horton. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and
Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2021 Paleontological Assessment for the Alessandro Corporate Center Project (Planning Case PR-2020-
000519), City of Riverside, Riverside County, California. Prepared for OZI Alessandro, LLC.
Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2021 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Boardwalk Project, La Jolla, City of San Diego.
Prepared for Project Management Advisors, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and
Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
Paleontological Assessment for the 8601 Mission Drive Project
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX B
Paleontological Records Search
Research & Collections
e-mail: paleorecords@nhm.org
August 18, 2021
Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
Attn: Todd Wirths
re: Paleontological resources for the 12247 Elliott Avenue Project
Dear Todd:
I have conducted a thorough search of our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen
data for proposed development at the 12247 Elliott Avenue project area as outlined on the portion of the
El Monte USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on August 10, 2021. We do
not have any fossil localities that lie directly within the proposed project area, but we do have fossil
localities nearby from the same sedimentary deposits that occur in the proposed project area, either at the
surface or at depth.
The following table shows the closest known localities in the collection of the Natural History
Museum of Los Angeles County.
Locality
Number Location Formation Taxa Depth
VPLACM6350-
6362; LACM IP
16968-16991 Puente Hills Landfill
Fernando
Formation; Repetto
Member (massive
clayey siltstone)
Herring (Ganolytes), hake
(Merluccius), rattail
(Coelorhynchus), lanternfish
(Lampanyctus, Diaphus), white
shark (Charcharodon
carcharias); marine mammals
(Cetacea); Invertebrates
(unspecified) unknown
LACM VP
7701- 7702
Intersection of 26th
St and Atlantic Blvd,
Bell Gardens
Unknown Formation
(Pleistocene; silt)
Fish (Gasterosteus); Snake
(Colubridae), Rodents
(Thomomys, Microtus,
Reithrodontomys); Rabbit
(Sylvilagus)
11 –
30 ft bgs
LACM VP 3363
W of Monterey Pass
Road in Coyote
Pass; E of the Long
Beach Freeway & S
of the N boundary of
Section 32;
Monterey Park
Unknown Formation
(Pleistocene; sand
and silt) Horse (Equus) unknown
LACM VP 3347 11204 Bluefield; La Habra Formation Horse (Equus) 2 feet bgs
Whittier (lacustrine silt with
caliche and plant
detritus)
LACM VP 7508
Near intersection of
Vellano Club Dr. and
Palmero Dr.,
Oakcrest
Development; N of
Serrano Canyon
Unknown formation
(Pleistocene)
Ground sloth (Nothrotheriops);
elephant family (Proboscidea);
horse (Equus) Unknown
LACM VP 1728
W of intersection of
English Rd & Peyton
Dr, Chino
Unknown (light
brown shale with
interbeds of very
coarse brown sand;
Pleistocene)
Horse (Equus), camel
(Camelops)
15-20 ft
bgs
VP, Vertebrate Paleontology; IP, Invertebrate Paleontology; bgs, below ground surface
This records search covers only the records of the Natural History Museum of Los
Angeles County (“NHMLA”). It is not intended as a paleontological assessment of the project
area for the purposes of CEQA or NEPA. Potentially fossil-bearing units are present in the
project area, either at the surface or in the subsurface. As such, NHMLA recommends that a full
paleontological assessment of the project area be conducted by a paleontologist meeting Bureau
of Land Management or Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards.
Sincerely,
Alyssa Bell, Ph.D.
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
enclosure: invoice
Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
October 6, 2021
Prepared for:
Bornstein Enterprises
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025
Prepared by:
Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 735 East Carnegie Drive, Suite 280
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Project No.: 185805355
Sign-off Sheet and Signatures of Environmental Professionals
Project No.: 185805355
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (“Stantec”)
for the account of Bornstein Enterprises (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is
strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule
and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions
in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published
and do not take into account any subsequent changes.
All information, conclusions, and recommendations provided by Stantec in this document regarding the Phase
I ESA have been prepared under the supervision of and reviewed by the professionals whose signatures
appear below.
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental
Professional as defined in § 312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education,
training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Property. I have
developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set
forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
Author:
Alicia Jansen
Associate Scientist
Quality Reviewer:
Joshua Sargent, MS, PG
Associate Geologist
Independent Reviewer:
Kyle Emerson, PG, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Project No.: 185805355 i
Table of Contents
ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... III
1.0 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1.1
2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2.1
2.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 2.2
2.2 SPECIAL TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS ..................... 2.2
2.3 EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ................................................................ 2.2
2.4 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS ................................................................................... 2.3
3.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION ................................................................................ 3.1
4.0 RECORDS REVIEW ........................................................................................................ 4.1
4.1 PHYSICAL SETTING ...................................................................................................... 4.1 4.1.1 Property Topography and Surface Water Flow ............................................. 4.1 4.1.2 Regional and Property Geology .................................................................... 4.1 4.1.3 Regional and Property Hydrogeology ........................................................... 4.2
4.2 FEDERAL, STATE AND TRIBAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS ................................ 4.3 4.2.1 Listings for Property ....................................................................................... 4.3 4.2.2 Listings for Nearby Sites with Potential to Impact Property .......................... 4.3
4.3 LOCAL/REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS ...................................................... 4.5 4.3.1 California Department of Geothermal and Energy Management ................. 4.5 4.3.2 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)...................... 4.5 4.3.3 Fire Department ............................................................................................. 4.6 4.3.4 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) ........................................ 4.6 4.3.5 Los Angeles County Department of Public Works ........................................ 4.6
4.3.6 Local Building and/or Planning Department Records ................................... 4.7
4.4 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................. 4.7 4.4.1 Land Title Records/Deeds ............................................................................. 4.7 4.4.2 Aerial Photographs ........................................................................................ 4.7
4.4.3 City Directories ............................................................................................... 4.8 4.4.4 Historical Fire Insurance Maps ...................................................................... 4.8 4.4.5 Historical Topographic Maps ......................................................................... 4.8 4.4.6 Other Historical Sources ................................................................................ 4.9
5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE.............................................................................................. 5.1
5.1 SITE RECONNAISSANCE METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 5.1
5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 5.1
5.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS .................................. 5.2
5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS .......................................................................................... 5.2
5.5 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ......................................................................................... 5.2
5.6 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS/STRUCTURES .................................................. 5.3
5.7 ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS ............................................................................ 5.3
5.8 ADJOINING PROPERTIES ............................................................................................. 5.3
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Project No.: 185805355 ii
5.8.1 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ............................................................ 5.3
5.8.2 Observed Evidence of Past Uses of Adjoining Properties ............................ 5.3 5.8.3 Pits, Ponds or Lagoons on Adjoining Properties ........................................... 5.4
5.9 OBSERVED PHYSICAL SETTING ................................................................................. 5.4
6.0 EVALUATION .................................................................................................................. 6.1
6.1 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS ............................................................................................ 6.1
6.2 DATA GAPS..................................................................................................................... 6.1
6.3 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 6.2
7.0 NON-SCOPE CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................. 7.1
7.1 LEAD-BASED PAINT ...................................................................................................... 7.1
7.2 ASBESTOS ...................................................................................................................... 7.1
7.3 RADON ............................................................................................................................ 7.1
7.4 FLOOD ZONES ............................................................................................................... 7.2
8.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 8.1
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 Property Location Map FIGURE 2 Property Vicinity Map
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY AND VICINITY .............................. A.1
APPENDIX B STANTEC RESUMES ................................................................................... B.1
USER PROVIDED RECORDS ...................................................................... C.1
ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY DATABASE SEARCH REPORT ................. D.1
HISTORICAL RECORDS .............................................................................. E.1
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Project No.: 185805355 iii
Abbreviations
AAI All Appropriate Inquiry
ACM Asbestos-containing material
AST Aboveground Storage Tank
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulation
CREC Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions
EP Environmental Professional
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
ft msl Feet above mean sea level
HREC Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions
LBP Lead-based paint
LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank
NESHAP National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants
PAHs Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyls
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
REC Recognized Environmental Conditions
SWMU Solid Waste Management Unit
TSCA Toxic Substance Control Act
USGS United States Geological Survey
UST Underground Storage Tank
VEC Vapor Encroachment Condition
VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Summary October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 1.1
1.0 SUMMARY
Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) report of the property 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles,
California (the “Property”), on behalf of Bornstein Enterprises (the “Client”). Bornstein Enterprises (the
“User”) has been designated the User of this report.
The Phase I ESA was conducted in conformance with the requirements of American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) Designation E 1527-13, and All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) as defined by the US-
EPA in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312, except as may have been modified by the
scope of work. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, the ASTM or AAI practice are described in Section
2.3.
The Property consists of three parcels of vacant land totaling approximately 3.34 acres addressed as
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California (the “Property”). An
asphalt parking lot is located in the southern portion of the Property. Additional patches of asphalt were
observed in the central-western portion of the Property. Surrounding property uses consists of residential
to the north, east, and south, and vacant land and a plant nursery to the west. A Property location map is
illustrated on Figure 1. A Property map illustrating the main features of the Property is provided as Figure
2. Photographs taken during the site reconnaissance visit are provided in Appendix A.
We have performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice
E1527 of 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California, or the
“Property”. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in the Data Gaps section of
this report. This assessment has revealed the following evidence of recognized environmental conditions
(RECs) in connection with the Property.
•Historical On-Site Agricultural Use. The Property was used for agricultural uses from at least
1928 through the 1950’s. Application of pesticide and herbicide is considered likely to have
occurred during this time period, potentially resulting in the accumulation of pesticides and metals
common with herbicide application in shallow soils at the Property. Therefore, the former
agricultural activity on the Property is considered a REC. Stantec recommends performing a
shallow soil investigation on the Property.
The preceding summary is intended for informational purposes only. Reading of the full body of this report
is recommended.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Introduction October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 2.1
2.0 INTRODUCTION
The objective of this Phase I ESA was to perform All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) into the past ownership
and uses of the Property consistent with good commercial or customary practice as outlined by the ASTM
in “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Process”, Designation E1527-13. “All Appropriate Inquiry” (AAI) is the process for evaluating a property’s
environmental conditions for the purpose of qualifying for landowner liability protections under CERCLA.
following final rule of Part 312 of Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 312). The purpose
of this Phase I ESA was to identify, to the extent feasible, adverse environmental conditions including
recognized environmental conditions (“RECs”) of the Property.
The ASTM E1527-13 standard indicates that the purpose of the Phase I ESA is to identify RECs,
including historical recognized environmental conditions (“HRECs”), and controlled recognized
environmental conditions (“CRECs”) that may exist at a property. The term “recognized environmental
conditions” means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products
in, on, or at a property:
1.Due to any release to the environment;2.Under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or
3.Under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.
ASTM defines a “HREC” as a REC that has occurred in connection with a property but has been
addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority and meets current unrestricted use
criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (e.g.,
property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before
calling the past release a HREC, the environmental professional (EP) must determine whether the past
release is a REC when the current Phase I ESA is conducted (e.g., if there has been a change in the
regulations). If the EP considers the past release to be a REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted,
the condition shall be included in the conclusions section of the report as a REC.
ASTM defines a “CREC” as a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum
products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (e.g., as
evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria
established by regulatory authority), but with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to
remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (e.g., property use restrictions, activity
and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls).
As defined by ASTM, RECs can include hazardous substances or petroleum products present under
conditions in compliance with laws if that presence represents a material threat of future release. The
presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products is, however, not a REC if that presence is a de
minimis condition. De minimis conditions are minor occurrences of contamination that generally do not
present a material risk to human health and would not likely be subject to enforcement action if brought to
the attention of governmental agencies.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Introduction October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 2.2
The scope of work conducted during this Phase I ESA consisted of a visual reconnaissance of the
Property, interviews with key individuals, and review of reasonably ascertainable documents.
The scope of work did not include an assessment for environmental regulatory compliance of any facility
ever operated at the Property (past or present), or sampling and analyzing of environmental media.
Stantec was not contracted to perform an independent evaluation of the purchase or lease price of the
Property and its relationship to current fair market value. The conclusions presented in this Phase I ESA
report are professional opinions based on data described herein. The opinions are subject to the
limitations described in Section 2.3.
ASTM E1527-13 notes that the availability of record information varies from source to source. The User or
Environmental Professional is not obligated to identify, obtain, or review every possible source that might
exist with respect to a property. Instead, ASTM identifies record information that is reasonably
ascertainable from standard sources. “Reasonably ascertainable” means:
1.Information that is publicly available;
2.Information that is obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints; and
3.Information that is practicably reviewable.
2.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Property consists of three parcels of vacant land totaling approximately 3.34 acres addressed as
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California (the “Property”).
Surrounding property uses consists of residential to the north, east, and south, and vacant land and a
plant nursery to the west. A Property location map is illustrated on Figure 1. A Property map illustrating
the main features of the Property is provided as Figure 2. Photographs taken during the site
reconnaissance visit are provided in Appendix A.
The Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) associated with the Property are 5389-009-029, -030, and -031.
2.2 SPECIAL TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
There were no special terms, conditions, or significant assumptions associated with this Phase I ESA.
2.3 EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
This report documents work that was performed in accordance with the MSA. No other representations,
warranties or guarantees are made concerning the accuracy or completeness of the data or conclusions
contained within this report.
This report provides an evaluation of specified environmental conditions associated with the identified
property that was assessed at the time the work was conducted and is based on information obtained by
and/or provided to Stantec at that time. 40 CFR 312.20(f)(2) requires that the Environmental Professional
evaluate the thoroughness and reliability of provided information. Stantec can neither warrant nor
guarantee such thoroughness or reliability, however.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Introduction October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 2.3
Conclusions made within this report consist of Stantec’s professional opinion as of the time of the
preparation of this report, and are based solely on the scope of work described in the report, the limited
data available and the results of the work. They are not a certification of the property’s environmental
condition.
Project Specific limiting conditions are provided in Section 2.2.
The conclusions are based on the site conditions encountered by Stantec at the time of the work.
Accordingly, additional studies and actions may be required. The identification of non-environmental risks
to structures or people on the Property is beyond the scope of this assessment.
Stantec specifically disclaims any responsibility to update the conclusions in this report if new or different
information later becomes available or if the conditions or activities on the property subsequently change.
2.4 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
This Phase I ESA was conducted by, or under the supervision of, an individual that meets the ASTM
definition of an Environmental Professional (EP). The credentials of the EP and other key Stantec
personnel involved in conducting this Phase I ESA are provided in Appendix B.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
User-Provided Information October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 3.1
3.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION
ASTM E1527-13 describes responsibilities of the User to complete certain tasks in connection with the
performance of “All Appropriate Inquiries” into the Property. The ASTM standard requires that the
Environmental Professional request information from the User on the results of those tasks because that
information can assist in the identification of RECs, CRECs, HRECs, or de minimis conditions in
connection with the Property. To accomplish that, Stantec requested that the User provide the following
documents and information:
Description of Information Provided (Yes / No) Description and/or Key Findings
User Questionnaire and/or Interview Yes No environmental issues were identified in the user questionnaire completed by Mr. ErikPfahler, Senior Vice Presidenital.
Environmental Liens or Activity Use Limitations N/A No environmental liens and/or activity use
limitations were identified in the Preliminary Title
Report dated June 2, 2021. A copy of the
Preliminary Title Report is provided in Appendix
C.
Previous Environmental Permits or Reports Provided by User No The user reportedly does not possess any of these documents.
Purpose of the Phase I ESA Yes Due Diligence
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.1
4.0 RECORDS REVIEW
The objective of consulting historical sources of information is to develop the history of the Property and
surrounding area and evaluate if past uses may have resulted in RECs. Physical setting records are
evaluated to determine if the physical setting may have contributed to adverse environmental conditions
in connection with the Property. During the review of historical records, Stantec attempted to identify uses
of the Property from the present to the first developed use of the Property. Stantec’s research included
the reasonably ascertainable and useful records described in this section.
4.1 PHYSICAL SETTING
A summary of the physical setting of the Property is provided in the table below with additional details in
the following subsections
Topography: The Property is relatively flat at an elevation of approximately 360 feet above mean sea level (amsl) with a general topographic gradient to the south (EDR, 2021).
Soil/Bedrock Data: The subsurface in the vicinity of the Property is described as silts, sand/silt mixtures, and poorly graded sand to approximately 60 feet below ground surface (bgs).
Estimated Depth to Groundwater/
Estimated Direction of Gradient:
Currently, the depth to groundwater ranges from 190 to 365 feet bgs in Property Area. (EPA, 2016)
NOTE:
Site-specific groundwater flow direction and depth can only be determined by conducting site-specific testing, which Stantec has not conducted.
4.1.1 Property Topography and Surface Water Flow
The Property is relatively flat at an elevation of approximately 360 feet above mean sea level (amsl) with
a general topographic gradient to the south-southeast (EDR, 2021). Based on the topography, surface
water on the Property is expected to infiltrate the ground surface. The Rubio Wash is located
approximately 0.38-mile west of the Property.
4.1.2 Regional and Property Geology
The Property is located in Los Angeles County. The area is located within the Peninsular Ranges
Geomorphic Province, which includes northwest-southeast trending mountain ranges and valleys that
have been developed by the San Andreas Fault system (California Geological Survey [CGS], 2002). The
stratigraphy underlying the vicinity of the Property consists primarily of recent-age alluvium (CDMG,
1965).
The geology in the area of the Property consists of unconsolidated alluvium overlying marine sedimentary
bedrock. The bedrock sequence with increasing depth consists of the Pico, Puente, and Topanga
Formations, and the Santa Monica Slate basement complex. The Property area alluvium primarily
consists of relatively fine-grained sediments with less prevalent layers of coarse-grained sediments.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.2
The closest mapped recently active fault is the Rio Hondo Fault located approximately 2 miles southeast
(CGS, 2010). According to official maps of California, the Site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo (AP)
Earthquake Fault Zone boundary but is within a liquefaction zone (CDMG, 2000).
4.1.3 Regional and Property Hydrogeology
The Property is located within the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin. The basin is located within the
eastern portion of Los Angeles County and includes most of San Gabriel Valley and part of the Santa Ana
Valley. The basin is constrained by bedrock and faults on all sides. Several aquifers are present in the
basin and water-bearing units consist of Holocene alluvium up to 4,100 feet in thickness and Pleistocene
marine deposits up to 2,000 feet in thickness (Department of Water Resources [DWR], 2004).
Three distinct groundwater zones occur in the Property area: shallow, intermediate, and deep. The
shallow groundwater zone is the first-encountered groundwater. Each groundwater zone generally dips
to the southeast. Although there is considerably variability in the area of the Property, the transition
between groundwater zones is typically observed between 200 and 250 feet below ground surface (bgs)
for the shallow and intermediate zones, and between 450 and 650 feet bgs for the intermediate and deep
zones (EPA, 2009). Currently, the depth to groundwater ranges from 190 to 365 feet bgs in Property
Area. (EPA, 2016)
The Property is within Area 3 of the San Gabriel Superfund Site. Area 3 is one of 8 Operable Units (OUs)
identified by United States Environmental Tprotection Agency (USEPA) for the San Gabriel Valley
Superfund Sites and is known as the San Gabriel Valley Area 3 Superfund Site. Covering 19 square
miles in the western portion of the San Gabriel Valley, Area 3 is located west of Rosemead Blvd, north of
I-10, and south of the Raymond Fault (which separates the main San Gabriel Basin from the Raymond
Basin to the northwest). Area 3 includes all of the City of San Gabriel, as well as portions of the Cities of
Alhambra, Rosemead, Temple City, San Marino and South Pasadena.
Discovery of contamination in water purveyor production wells led USEPA to designate Area 3 as a
National Priority List (NPL) site in 1984. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been detected in
production wells and safeguards are in place to ensure acceptable drinking water quality. Area 3
groundwater is contaminated with VOCs (most commonly tetrachloroethene [PCE] and trichloroethene
[TCE]), perchlorate, and nitrate at concentrations exceeding state and federal water quality standards.
The USEPA issued the Remediation Investigation (RI) Report in June 2009. The RI Report indicates that
groundwater contamination is present in the western bedrock aquifer, western alluvial aquifer, and
eastern alluvial aquifer (shallow, intermediate, and deep zones). The RI Report also indicates that
groundwater production in the eastern portion of Area 3 impacts contaminant migration. To identify the
sources of the groundwater contamination and determine what additional cleanup is needed, the State of
California has directed and overseen investigations of more than 20 current and former industrial
facilities. USEPA supplemented these investigations with 10 new ground water monitoring wells and soil
testing at four industrial facilities identified as possible sources of groundwater contamination. USEPA is
using the data generated by these investigations to identify and evaluate groundwater cleanup options. In
2016, USEPA expects to complete a feasibility study and develop a proposed soil and groundwater
cleanup plan.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.3
Groundwater in the western alluvial aquifer flows generally southeastward to eastward following the
bedrock structural features, and exhibits steeper horizontal hydraulic gradients than the eastern alluvial
aquifer. Finer-grained alluvium restricts groundwater flow. The eastern alluvial aquifer consists of multiple,
leaky aquifers, with groundwater flow generally to the west/southwest in the vicinity of the NEOU. The
main influences on groundwater flow in the eastern alluvial aquifer include groundwater pumping, the
presence of fine-grained units that either allow leakage or obstruct vertical groundwater flow, and limited
groundwater recharge.
4.2 FEDERAL, STATE AND TRIBAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
A regulatory agency database search report was obtained from Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
(EDR), a third-party environmental database search firm. A complete copy of the database search report,
including the date the report was prepared, the date the information was last updated, and the definition
of databases searched, is provided in Appendix D.
Stantec evaluated the information listed within the database relative to potential impact to the Property,
assessing the potential for impacts based in part on the physical setting. As part of this process,
inferences have been made regarding the likely groundwater flow direction at or near the Property. As
described in 4.1.3, the inferred shallow groundwater flow direction is likely to be in the south direction.
Observations about the Property and surrounding properties made during the Property reconnaissance
are provided in more detail in Section 5.
4.2.1 Listings for Property
The Property is identified in the hazardous waste tracking system (HWTS) and HAZNET databases for
the disposal of asbestos-containing materials in 1989 and 1990, related to the demolition of the church
structure formerly located in the southern portion of the Property. Given these materials were properly
disposed from the Property, and lack of reported violations, this listings is not considered to pose a REC
to the Property.in the environmental database report.
4.2.2 Listings for Nearby Sites with Potential to Impact Property
Stantec assessed data presented in the environmental agency database search report to evaluate the
potential for conditions on adjacent and nearby sites to pose a REC, CREC, or HREC for the Property.
The evaluation included an opinion of the potential for contamination by hazardous substances or
petroleum products to migrate to the Property from a nearby property, including by vapor migration or
encroachment (i.e., potential for a vapor encroachment condition [VEC].
Based on this evaluation, the following individual facilities were identified as the most likely potential
sources of impact to the Property. The basis for why each of the following listed databases creates a REC
for the property is also provided.
Listed Facility Name/Address Database Listing
Distance/Direction from
Property
REC?
(YES / NO)
Hytone Cleaners
4521 Dubonnet Avenue
Rosemead, California 91770
EDR Hist Claners Approximately 460 feet
east
No
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.4
Listed Facility Name/Address Database Listing Distance/Direction from Property REC? (YES / NO)
The facility is listed as a laundry and dry-cleaning facility in 2013. However, upon review of the listing, it
appear the facility is located within a residence. Given the distance of the facility from the Property, depth
to groundwater in the area of the Property, and lack of reported chemical uses at this facility, this listing is
considered unlikely to represent a REC to the Property.
Sakaida Nursery Inc.
8626 East Grand Avenue
Rosemead, California 91770
RCRA-SQG, UST,
CERS HAZ WASTE,
SWEEPS UST,
FINDS, ECHO,
HAZNET, LOS
ANGELES CO HMS,
CERS, HWTS
Adjacent west. No
This facility is listed for the generation of small quantities of hazardous waste, disposal of waste oil and
unspecified organic mixture from 1990 through 2002, and the presence of two (2) underground storage
tanks (USTs). Information within the database report indicates the USTs may be used for storage of
waste oil. Multiple administrative violations are recorded for this facility, including failure to maintain
waste manifests and failure to properly label hazardous waste storage containers. The violations were
corrected, and returned to compliance shortly after the violations were filed.
Given the content of the USTs was waste oil and the estimated depth to groundwater is greater than 50
feet bgs, this listing is considered unlikely to represent a REC to the Property. San Gabriel Valley (Area 3)
Main Street & Garfield Avenue
Alhambra, California 91801
NPL; SEMS; PRP; Approximately ½ mile
northwest
No
The San Gabriel Valley (Area 1) is a groundwater plume that runs along the axis of the west fork of the
Alhambra Creek in the San Gabriel groundwater basin. The plume is approximately 2 miles long and 1
mile wide. The groundwater is contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE).
The USEPA is continuing investigation and evaluation to identify groundwater contamination sources.
Given the depth to groundwater in the area of the Property, and the mapped Area 3 groundwater plume is
not present below the Property, the San Gabriel Valley (Area 3) plume does not represent an
environmental concern to the Property and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding this
issue.
San Gabriel Valley (Area 1)
Peck Road & Real
El Monte, California 91801
NPL; SEMS; PRP;
US ENG
CONTROLS; ROD,
CONSENT; FINDS,
ECHO
Approximately ½ mile
east-southeast
No
The San Gabriel Valley (Area 3) is a groundwater plume that runs along the axis of the Rio Hondo Wash
and the Salt Pit Wash in the San Gabriel groundwater basin in El Monte, California. The plume is
approximately 4 miles long and 1.5 mile wide. The groundwater is contaminated with trichloroethylene
(TCE), tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and carbon tetrachloride (CTC). The USEPA is continuing
investigation and evaluation to identify groundwater contamination sources.
Given the depth to groundwater in the area of the Property, and the mapped Area 3 groundwater plume is
not present below the Property, the San Gabriel Valley (Area 3) plume does not represent an
environmental concern to the Property and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding this
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.5
Listed Facility Name/Address Database Listing Distance/Direction from Property REC? (YES / NO)
issue.
The remaining listings in the database search report provided in Appendix D do not constitute a REC for
the Property. Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding any of those listings.
4.3 LOCAL/REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Stantec checked the following sources to obtain information pertaining to Property use and/or indications
of RECs in connection with the Property:
4.3.1 California Department of Geothermal and Energy Management
Agency Name
Contact Information Finding
California Department of Geothermal and Energy
Management (CalGEM)
5816 Corporate Avenue, Suite 200
Cypress, CA 90630
Online database: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/
dog/Pages/WellFinder.aspx
September 30, 2021
Stantec searched for oil wells on the California
Department of Geothermal and Energy
Management (CalGEM) online database. There
are no oil wells on the Property. The nearest oil
well is a plugged dry hole located
approximately7,200 feet to the south (American
Petroleum Institute number 0403705500).
4.3.2 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)
Agency Name, Contact Information Findings
California State Water Resources
Control Board, Los Angeles (RWQCB)
320 W 4th Street, Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90013
(213) 576-6600
September 30, 2021
Stantec researched the online database Geotracker managed
by this agency (geotracker.waterbarods.ca.gov). No records
were found on the database website for the Property address
or adjacent properties.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.6
4.3.3 Fire Department
Agency Name
Contact Information
Finding
County of Los Angeles
Fire Department
Hazardous
Materials Division
1320 N. Eastern Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90063
(323) 881-2411
September 30, 2021
Stantec the Property addresses on the County of Los Angeles Fire
Department Hazardous Materials Division website. The Property
addresses were not identified on the Site Mitigation Inventory database,
or the active or inactive facility list. Additionally, Stantec submitted a
public records request to this agency on September 30, 2021. At the
time of this report no response had been received. Should any pertinent
information become available an addendum to this report will be issued.
Based on its review of other sources, however, Stantec considers it
unlikely that any records from this agency would alter the conclusions or
recommendations of this report.
4.3.4 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
Agency Name
Contact Information
Finding
Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC)
5796 Corporate Ave.,
Cypress, CA 90630
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/
September 30, 2021
Stantec researched the online database Envirostor managed
by this agency (envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov). No records were found
on the database website for the Property address or adjacent
properties.
4.3.5 Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
Agency Name
Contact Information Finding
Los Angeles County Department of Public
Works (DPW)
Environmental Programs Division
UST Program
900 South Fremont Avenue, 3rd Floor
Alhambra, California
Tel: (626) 458-3517
http://ladpw.org/epd/CleanLA/OpenFileRevi
ew.aspx
September 30, 2021
Stantec researched the online database managed by this
agency
(http://ladpw.org/epd/CleanLA/OpenFileReview.aspx). No
records were found on the database website for the
Property.
Stantec also research the Solid Waste Management
System database managed by this agency
(https://dpw.lacounty.gov/epd/swims/OnlineServices/searc
h-methane-hazards-esri.aspx) to determine if methane
mitigation is required for the Property. According to this
database, the Property is not within 300 feet of an oil or
gas well or 1,000 feet of a methane producing site.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.7
4.3.6 Local Building and/or Planning Department Records
Agency Name, Contact
Information Findings
Los Angeles County Department
of Building and Safety
Online database:
http://ladpw.org/bsd/content/
September 30, 2021
Stantec searched for available documents for the Property on the
Department of Public Works online building permit viewer.
No records were available.
4.4 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW
4.4.1 Land Title Records/Deeds
No environmental liens and/or activity use limitations were identified in the Preliminary Title Report dated
June 2, 2021. A copy of the Preliminary Title Report is provided in Appendix C. No additional land title
records, deeds, environmental liens, and activity and use limitation documentation were provided by the
User. During the course of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Stantec identified no evidence
of any environmental liens or activity and use limitations associated with the Property.
4.4.2 Aerial Photographs
Stantec reviewed historical aerial photographs provided by EDR. The general type of activity on a
property and land use changes can often be discerned from the type and layout of structures visible in the
photographs. However, specific elements of a facility's operation usually cannot be discerned from aerial
photographs alone. The following table summarizes Stantec’s observations of the reviewed historical
aerial photographs.
Year Scale Observations, Property and Adjoining Properties
1928 1=500’ The Property appears to be developed with one residential structure in the
southeast corner, and the remainder of the Property is vacant, or used for agricultural activities. The surrounding area is developed with a mixture of agricultural operations (row cropping and orchards) and residential uses.
1938, 1948 1=500’ The majority of the Property is utilized for row cropping, and appears associated with the adjoining west agricultural operations. The surrounding area has increased residential and commercial development.
1948, 1952 1=500’ The Property agricultural operations appear to be dormant, evidenced by a lack of foliage present in the northern and southern portions of the Property.
1964, 1977
1979, 1981
1989
1=500’ A large commercial structure is located in the southern portion of the Property.
The northern portion of the Property appears vacant. The surrounding area has increased residential and commercial development, and is largely devoid of agricultural operations, with the exception of the adjoining-west property.
1994, 2002
2005, 2009
1=500’ The commercial structure located in the southern portion of the Property has been removed, and the Property is now vacant. A dirt path is located on the
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.8
Year Scale Observations, Property and Adjoining Properties
2012, 2016 Property, traversing south from Mission Drive north to the nearby plant nursery and residences. There also appear to be some soil placement/disturbance in the northern portion of the Property from 2002-2009.
Name of aerial photograph source: EDR, 2021
4.4.3 City Directories
Stantec retained a third party (EDR) to research available reverse city directories for the Property,
in approximately five-year intervals. The following is a summary of Stantec’s review of the city directory
listings:
Subject/Adjoining Property Year Listed Occupants
Property Address:
8601 Mission Drive
1957 to 1985 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Property Address:
8623 Mission Drive
1975 – 1985 Schwebach Frank N (residential)
Adjoining West:
8626 Grand Avenue
-- Not Listed
Adjoining East:
Various on Bartlett Avenue
1957 – 2012 Various Residential
Name of city directories and source: EDR, 2021
4.4.4 Historical Fire Insurance Maps
Fire insurance maps were developed for use by insurance companies to depict facilities, properties, and
their uses for many locations throughout the United States. These maps provide information on the
history of prior land use and are useful in assessing whether there may be potential environmental
contamination on or near the Property. These maps, which have been periodically updated since the late
19th century, often provide valuable insight into historical Property uses.
Stantec requested fire insurance maps from EDR; however, no coverage exists for the Property. The
Sanborn® Map Search Report indicating “no coverage” is presented in Appendix E.
4.4.5 Historical Topographic Maps
Stantec reviewed historical USGS 7.5-minute Topographic Maps of the El Monte, California Quadrangle
(scale 1:24,000) to help identify past Property usage and areas of potential environmental concern.
Copies of the historical maps are provided in Appendix E. The following table summarizes the maps
reviewed and our observations.
Year Scale Observations, Property and Adjoining Properties
1894, 1896 1:62,500 No structures or indicators of potential RECs were depicted on the map. A
railroad line is located approximately 500 feet north of the Property, and the
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Records Review October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 4.9
Year Scale Observations, Property and Adjoining Properties
1900 city of San Gabriel is depicted to the west of the Property.
1923/1924
1926, 1928
1:24,000 A single small structure is depicted in the extreme southeast corner of the Property. The remaining portions of the Property appear undeveloped/vacant. The surrounding area is sparsely developed. Rubio Wash is located approximately 0.35 miles to the west.
1948 1:24,000 The Property and immediate surrounding area appears similar to the previous
map. Considerable development has occurred to the southeast of the Property, within the city of Rosemead.
1953 1:24,000 Most structures have been removed from the map, and replaced by red
shading, indicating recent development, which includes the Property. A transmission power line corridor is depicted adjacent west of the Property.
1966, 1972
1981, 1991
1994
1:24,000 The Property is depicted as developed with a church. The surrounding area is similar to the previous map.
2012 1:24,000 No details are depicted on the map. Roads appear is the current
configuration.
Name of maps and source: EDR, 2021
4.4.6 Other Historical Sources
No other historical sources were researched.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Site Reconnaissance October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 5.1
5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
A visit to the Property and its vicinity was conducted by Ms. Debbie Hernandez, Staff Geologist with
Stantec, on October 4, 2021. Access to the Property was provided by Mr. Erik Pfahler with Borstein
Enterprises. Stantec was unaccompanied during the Property visit. Figure 2 provides information about
the Property and adjoining properties and the location of potential areas of environmental concern.
Photographs collected during the Property visit are included in Appendix A.
5.1 SITE RECONNAISSANCE METHODOLOGY
The site reconnaissance focused on observation of current conditions and observable indications of past
uses and conditions of the Property that may indicate the presence of RECs. The reconnaissance of the
Property was conducted on foot and Stantec utilized the following methodology to observe the Property:
• Traverse the outer Property boundary.
• Traverse transects across the Property.
Weather conditions during the visit to the Property were clear and sunny. There were no weather-related
Property access restrictions encountered during the reconnaissance visit.
5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Property and Area Description: The Property is located northeast of the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission Drive in the city of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California. The surrounding area consists of residential properties and a nursery.
Property Operations. The Property consists of vacant land.
Structures, Roads, Other Improvements: An asphalt parking lot is located in the southern portion of the Property. The rest of the Property consists of vacant land. Additional patches of asphalt were located in the central western portion of the Property.
Property Size (acres): 3.34 acres
Estimated % of Property Covered by Buildings and/or Pavement:
0%
Observed Current Property Use/Operations: The Property consists of vacant land.
Observed Evidence of Past Property Use(s): None
Sewage Disposal Method (and age): City of Rosemead
Potable Water Source: City of Rosemead
Electric Utility: Southern California Edison
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Site Reconnaissance October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 5.2
5.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
The following table summarizes Stantec’s observations during the Property reconnaissance.
Observations Description/Location
Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products as Defined by CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14):
None observed.
Drums (≥ 5 gallons): None observed.
Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors: None detected.
Pools of Liquid: None observed.
Unidentified Substance Containers: None observed.
PCB-Containing Equipment: Pole mounted transformers were observed along the western perimeter. The transformers were observed in good condition without any indication of leaking or staining.
Other Observed Evidence of Hazardous Substances or Petroleum Products:
None observed.
5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS
Given there are no structures on the Property, this section of the report is not applicable.
5.5 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS
Stantec made the following observations during the site reconnaissance of exterior areas of the Property
and/or identified the following information during the interview or records review portions of the
assessment:
Observations Description
On-site Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons: None observed.
Stained Soil or Pavement: None observed.
Stressed Vegetation: None observed.
Waste Streams and Waste Collection Areas:
None observed.
Solid Waste Disposal: None observed.
Potential Areas of Fill Placement: None observed.
Wastewater: None observed.
Stormwater: Surface water on the Property infiltrates the ground surface or
flows overland into the curb and gutter system along Mission
Drive.
Wells: None observed.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Site Reconnaissance October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 5.3
Observations Description
Septic Systems: None observed.
Other Exterior Observations: None observed.
5.6 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS/STRUCTURES
Existing USTs: No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface patches), which would indicate the presence of USTs, was discovered during the site reconnaissance.
Former USTs: No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface patches), reports, or other evidence of the former presence of USTs was discovered during this Phase I ESA.
Other Underground Structures:
None observed.
5.7 ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS
Existing
ASTs:
No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface stains), which would
indicate the presence of ASTs, was discovered during the site reconnaissance.
Former ASTs: No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface stains), reports, or other evidence of the former presence of ASTs was discovered during this Phase I ESA.
5.8 ADJOINING PROPERTIES
5.8.1 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties
As viewed from the Property and/or from public rights-of-way, Stantec made the following observations
about use and activities on adjoining properties:
NORTH Residential structures.
EAST Residential.
SOUTH Mission Drive beyond which is residential and a church.
WEST Overhead power lines and a nursery.
5.8.2 Observed Evidence of Past Uses of Adjoining Properties
Observations of adjoining properties providing indications of past use and activities, if any, are described
below.
NORTH None observed.
EAST None observed.
SOUTH None observed.
WEST None observed.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Site Reconnaissance October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 5.4
5.8.3 Pits, Ponds or Lagoons on Adjoining Properties
As viewed from the Property and/or from public rights-of-way, Stantec made the following observations
about the presence of pits, ponds and lagoons on adjoining properties:
NORTH None observed.
EAST None observed.
SOUTH None observed.
WEST None observed.
5.9 OBSERVED PHYSICAL SETTING
Topography of the
Property and Surrounding Area:
The Property and surrounding area are relatively flat.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Evaluation October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 6.1
6.0 EVALUATION
This section provides a summary overview of or Findings, Opinions, and Conclusions.
6.1 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS
Information gathered from interviews, reviews of existing data, and a Property inspection was evaluated
to determine if RECs are present in connection with the Property. Based on this information, Stantec
made the following findings and developed the following opinions.
• The Property was used for agricultural uses from at least 1928 through the 1950’s. Application of
pesticide and herbicide is considered likely to have occurred during this time period, potentially
resulting in the accumulation of pesticides and metals common with herbicide application in shallow
soils at the Property.
Therefore, the former agricultural activity on the Property is considered a REC. Stantec recommends
performing a shallow soil investigation on the Property.
• An environmental records search was performed and identified sites within their respective ASTM E
1527-13 search radii of the Property that may represent RECs, HRECs, or de minimis conditions.
Based on one or more of the following reasons: distance from the Property, position of sites with
respect to assumed groundwater flow direction, the native soils, and regulatory status, none of the
sites identified in the in the environmental records search report are expected to affect soil or
groundwater quality at the Property. The environmental records search identified no RECs, HRECs or
de minimis conditions at or near the Property.
6.2 DATA GAPS
The federal AAI final rule [40 CFR 312.10(a)] and ASTM E1527-13 identify a “data gap” as the lack or
inability to obtain information required by the standards and practices of the rule despite good faith efforts
by the EP or the User.
Any data gaps resulting from the Phase I ESA described in this report are listed and discussed below.
Gap Discussion
Deletions or Exceptions from Scope of Work Referenced in Section 1.4:
None
Weather-Related Restrictions to Site Reconnaissance: None
Facility Access Restrictions to Site Reconnaissance: None
Other Site Reconnaissance None
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Evaluation October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 6.2
Restrictions:
Data Gaps from Environmental Records Review:
Land title records, deeds, environmental liens, and activity and use
limitation documentation was not provided by the User, and public
records were not searched by Stantec.
Data Gaps from Historical
Records Review: None
Data Gaps from Interviews: No on-site interview was conducted during the site reconnaissance. However, given the use of the buildings and historical documents available the lack of an interview is not considered a significant data gap and is unlikely to impact the findings of this report.
Other Data Gaps: None
6.3 CONCLUSIONS
We have performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice
E1527 of 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California, or the
“Property”. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in the Data Gaps section of
this report. This assessment has revealed the following evidence of recognized environmental conditions
(RECs) in connection with the Property.
• Historical On-Site Agricultural Use. The Property was used for agricultural uses from at least
1928 through the 1950’s. Application of pesticide and herbicide is considered likely to have
occurred during this time period, potentially resulting in the accumulation of pesticides and metals
common with herbicide application in shallow soils at the Property. Therefore, the former
agricultural activity on the Property is considered a REC. Stantec recommends performing a
shallow soil investigation on the Property.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Non-Scope Considerations October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 7.1
7.0 NON-SCOPE CONSIDERATIONS
The following ASTM E1527-13 non-scope services were performed as part of this Phase I ESA:
7.1 LEAD-BASED PAINT
Concern for lead-based paint (LBP) is primarily related to residential structures. The EPA’s Final Rule on
Disclosure of Lead-Based Paint in Housing (40 CFR Part 745) defines LBP as paint or other surface
coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligram per square centimeter or 0.5 percent by
weight.
The risk of lead toxicity in LBP varies based upon the condition of the paint and the year of its application.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has identified the following risk factors:
• The age of the dwelling as follows: maximum risk is from paint applied before 1950.
• There is severe risk from paint applied before 1960.
• There is moderate risk from deteriorated paint applied before 1970. • There is slight risk from the paint that is intact but applied before 1977.
• The condition of the painted surfaces.
• The presence of children and certain types of households in the building.
• Previously reported cases of lead poisoning in the building or area.
No structures are currently on the Property.
7.2 ASBESTOS
Asbestos can be found in many applications, including sprayed-on or blanket-type insulation, pipe wraps,
mastics, floor and ceiling tiles, wallboard, mortar, roofing materials, and a variety of other materials
commonly used in construction. The greatest asbestos-related human health risks are associated with
friable asbestos, which is ACM that can be reduced to powder by hand pressure. Friable asbestos can
become airborne and inhaled, which has been associated with specific types of respiratory disease. The
manufacturing and use of asbestos in most building products was curtailed during the late 1970s.
Stantec makes no warranty as to the possible existence or absence of inaccessible materials or to their
evaluation with respect to asbestos content. Samples of suspect ACM should be collected for laboratory
analysis of asbestos prior to any renovation or building demolition to be compliant with, EPA National
Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations.
No structures are currently on the Property.
7.3 RADON
Radon is a colorless, tasteless radioactive gas with an EPA-specified action level of 4.0 PicoCuries per
liter of air (pCi/L) for residential properties. Radon gas has a very short half-life of 3.8 days. The health
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Non-Scope Considerations October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 7.2
risk potential of radon is primarily associated with its rate of accumulation within confined areas near or in
the ground, such as basements, where vapors can readily transfer to indoor air from the ground through
foundation cracks or other pathways. Large, adequately ventilated rooms generally present limited risk for
radon exposure. The radon concentrations in buildings and homes depend on many factors, including soil
types, temperature, barometric pressure, and building construction (EPA, 1993).
Stantec reviewed regional data published by the EPA on average indoor radon concentrations in the
vicinity of the Property (http://www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.html).
EPA Radon Zones (w/Average Measured Indoor Radon concentrations)
Zone 1 – High (>4.0 pCi/L) Zone 2 – Moderate (2 to 4 pCi/L) Zone 3 – Low (<2 pCi/L)
Normally-occupied sub grade areas present? (i.e., basement apartments, offices, stores, etc.)
None.
The Property is located in Zone 2 and is considered to have medium potential for radon. Two of the 11
tests from zip code 91770 (the zip code of the Property) were above 4 pCi/L. To determine Property-
specific radon levels, a radon survey would have to be conducted. However, based on the average first
floor reading of 0.711 pCi/L for Los Angeles County, radon appears to be unlikely to represent an
environmental concern to the Property and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding this
issue.
7.4 FLOOD ZONES
According to the Physical Setting summary portion of the EDR report, the Property is not located within a
500-year or 100-year flood plain.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
References October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 8.1
8.0 REFERENCES
American Society for Testing and Materials, 2015, Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on
Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions, Designation E 2600-15.
American Society for Testing and Materials, 2013, Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation: E 1527-13.
California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOG), 2021,
website http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dog/maps
____, California Department of Geothermal and Energy Resources (CalGEM) Well Finder database, 2021,
website https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/
Department of Toxic Substances and Control, 2021, website http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/
California Geological Survey (CGS), 2002, California Geomorphic Provinces, Note 36.
_____, 2010a, Fault Activity Map of California, adjustable scale,
http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/FAM/faultactivitymap.html.
_____, 2010b, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones of California,
http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/ap/ap_maps.htm.
Department of Water Resources (DWR), 2004, Groundwater Bulletin 118, updated February 27.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), EDR Radius Map with Geocheck, Inquiry Number
6684447.2s, dated January 2, 2019.
_____, Certified Sanborn Map Report, Inquiry Number 6684447.3, dated September 30, 2021.
_____, Historical Topographic Map Report, Inquiry Number 6684447.4, dated September 30, 2021.
_____, Aerial Photo Decade Package, Inquiry Number 6684447.8, dated September 30, 2021.
_____, City Directory Abstract, Inquiry Number 6684447.5, dated September 31, 2021.
State Water Resource Control Board’s Geotracker, 2021, website https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1966, El Monte Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Topographic Map,
Scale 1 inch = 2,000 feet, photo revised 1994.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Project No.: 185805355
FIGURES
ProjectLocation
V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2021-10-04 By: dehernandez1
Borstein Enterprises185805355Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770
Property Location Map
Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata.
Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO,NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community
Figure No.
Title
Project Location
Client/Project
Property Boundary
(At original document size of 8.5x11)1:24,000 ($$¯0 1,200 2,400Feet
SUBJECT PROPERTY
ProjectLocation
V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2021-10-04 By: dehernandez2
Borstein Enterprises185805355Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PROPERTY DETAILS
Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata.
Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: © 2021 Microsoft Corporation ©2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS
Figure No.
Title
Project Location
Client/Project
Property Boundary
Assessor Parcel (At original document size of 8.5x11)1:1,500 ($$¯0 75 150Feet
8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770
MISSION DRIVEWALNUT GROVE AVENUEVACANT LOT
PARK
RESIDENTIAL
NURSERY
RESIDENTIAL
CHURCH
RESIDENTIAL POLE MOUNTED TRASFORMERSPOLE MOUNTED
TRASFORMERS
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Project No.: 185805355
APPENDICES
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Appendix A Photographs of the Property and Vicinity October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 A.1
Appendix A Photographs of the Property and Vicinity
Photographic Log
Page 1 of 5
Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333
Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California
Photograph ID:1
Photo Location:
4703 Walnut Grove Ave
Direction:
Southwest
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
Guess Park and residential
homes located to the west
of the Property beyond
Walnut Grove Avenue.
Photograph ID:2
Photo Location:
4709 Walnut Grove Ave
Direction:
Northwest
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
Residential homes located
to the west of the Property
beyond Walnut Grove
Avenue.
Photographic Log
Page 2 of 5
Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333
Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California
Photograph ID:3
Photo Location:
8626 Grand Ave
Direction:
Northeast
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
Sakaida Nursery located to
the adjacent northwest of
the Property.
Photograph ID:4
Photo Location:
8618 Mission Dr
Direction:
Southwest
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
Church and residential
homes located to the south
beyond Mission Drive.
Photographic Log
Page 3 of 5
Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333
Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California
Photograph ID:5
Photo Location:
8601 Mission Dr
Direction:
Northeast
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
View of the asphalt parking
lot in the southern portion
of the Property facing
north-northeast.
Photograph ID:6
Photo Location:
8623 Mission Dr
Direction:
Northeast
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
Residential homes located
to the adjacent east.
Photographic Log
Page 4 of 5
Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333
Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California
Photograph ID:7
Photo Location:
8601 Mission Dr
Direction:
Northwest
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
Electrical transmission
lines located to the
northwest of the Property
within the nursery. A pole
mounted transformer lies
within the Property
boundary.
Photograph ID:8
Photo Location:
8601 Mission Dr
Direction:
Northeast
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
Tree trunks and vacant
land beyond which are
additional residential
homes. A second pole
mounted transformer was
observed along the eastern
Property boundary.
Photographic Log
Page 5 of 5
Client:Borstein Enterprises Project:185805333
Site Name:8601 Mission Drive Site Location:Rosemead, California
Photograph ID:9
Photo Location:
8601 Mission Dr
Direction:
Southwest
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
View of the northern
portion of the Property
facing south-southwest.
Photograph ID:10
Photo Location:
8601 Mission Dr
Direction:
Southwest
Survey Date:
10/4/2021
Comments:
Additional patches of
asphalt located in the
central western portion of
the Property.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Appendix B Stantec Resumes October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 B.1
Appendix B STANTEC RESUMES
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Alicia Jansen CAC, LRCIA
Environmental Scientist 18 years of experience
Alicia is an Associate Scientist with over fifteen years
of experience in Phase I and II Environmental
Assessments, with strong emphasis in water quality
and environmental research. Alicia has managed the
preparation of environmental documents, training
programs, and environmental compliance during large
scale environmental monitoring projects. Alicia’s
environmental consulting experience includes
performing asbestos and lead-based paint surveys,
oversight of contractors during asbestos abatement,
hazardous materials surveys, and Phase I
Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) in
accordance with the practices identified in the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E 1527-13
and the Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property, ASTM
Designation E 2247-16.
EDUCATION
BA, Environmental Studies, San Jose State University, San Jose, California, 2004
CERTIFICATIONS & TRAINING
Residential Measurement Provider, 108212, National Radon Proficiency Program, Anaheim, California, 2015
REGISTRATIONS
Certified Asbestos Consultant #CAC #15-5379, State of California Division of Occupational Safety and Health
Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor #LRC-00005363, California Department of Public Health
MEMBERSHIPS
Member, Groundwater Resources Association of California
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
HEALTH, SAFETY & INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
Confidential Health Care Company, Asbestos, Lead-Based Paint, and Hazardous Materials Survey | Northern California | Staff
Alicia assisted with site inspections for asbestos, lead-based paint, and hazardous materials at multiple occupied hospitals and office spaces. The scope of work
involved sample collection for asbestos and lead-based paint in addition to the quantification of universal wastes (PCBs, mercury containing equipment, refrigerants, etc.) that would require special handling and disposal. She assisted with the preparation of reports summarizing findings.
State of California General Services, Asbestos, Lead-Based Paint, and Hazardous Materials Survey | Northern California | 2009 | Technical Support
Alicia assisted with site inspections for asbestos, lead-based paint, and hazardous materials at multiple communication towers in remote areas. The scope of work involved sample collection for asbestos and lead-based paint in addition to the quantification of universal wastes (PCBs, mercury containing equipment, refrigerants, etc.) that would require special handling and disposal. She assisted with the preparation of reports summarizing findings. Role: Technical Support | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 10/2009-10/2009
Indoor Air Quality Assessments* | San Jose, California | 2002-2005 | Staff
Alicia performed site inspections, interviews, and collected air samples to be analyzed for various air pollutants and molds including formaldehyde, penicillium, aspergillus, cladosporium, and stachybotry. She prepared reports summarizing findings and made recommendations.
Veteran's Administration of Puget Sound, Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey | Seattle, Washington | 2009 | Project Scientist
Alicia served as the Project Scientist responsible for hazardous building material assessments, specifically asbestos and lead-based paint. These services were required as part of the pre-design tasks for this project. Over 300 samples were collected over the span of four days culminating in a final hazardous building materials report to be incorporated into the facility design as well as demolition activities once the construction phase of the project commences.
Interim Remedial Action, Indoor Air Sampling, and Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling | Sunnyvale, California | 2004–2014 | Task Manager and Field Support
Alicia conducted an indoor air sampling survey using air sampling pumps, dosimeter badges, and flame ionization detector (FID) during a sump excavation. She performs semi-annual sub-slab soil vapor sampling and indoor air quality surveys using summa canisters. She assists with the preparation and submittal of reports summarizing the findings and provides recommendations to the local regulatory agency. Role: Indoor Air Sampling Survey | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 09/2004-09/2014
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Lead Dust Assessment and Abatement Oversight | Fremont, California | 2009 | Technical Support
Alicia assisted with the evaluation of lead dust in an industrial facility. A total of 307 dust wipe samples were collected in order to evaluate the potential presence of lead dust throughout the two-story, 500,000 square foot manufacturing building. Role: Technical Support | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 01/2009-03/2009
Former Tesoro Coke Facility, Asbestos, Lead-Based Paint Survey | Pittsburg, California | Technical Support
Alicia assisted with an asbestos and lead paint survey of 20 structures at the facility ultimately scheduled for demolition. More than 200 samples were collected over the span of two days. She prepared a report for demolition while also providing the information needed for worker safety during demolition activities at the facility. Role: Technical Support | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 04/2009-04/2009
State of California General Services, Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey | Southern California | 2014-2019 | Certified Asbestos Consultant
Alicia conducted with site inspections for asbestos and lead-based paint at multiple bridges, maintenance stations, and roadways throughout Southern California. The scope of work involved sample collection for asbestos and lead-based paint that would require special handling and disposal. She assisted with the review and approval of reports summarizing findings. Role: Certified Asbestos Consultant | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 9/2014-10/2019
PERMITTING, COMPLIANCE, AUDITING
Tesoro Refinery, Initial Study* | Benicia, California | 2005 | Staff
Alicia assisted with the background research and preparation of applicant-prepared initial study for the upgrade of a refinery.
Transmission Line Upgrade* | San Mateo to San Francisco, California | 2005 | Environmental Research and Compliance Staff
Alicia supported the environmental compliance program for the construction of a 27-mile 230 kV underground and overhead transmission line. She assisted with the preparation and submittal of variance requests, extra
work space requests, and daily and weekly reports for submittal to the California Public Utilities Commission. She also conducted research and assisted with training and report preparation.
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS & ASSESSMENTS
California Department of Transportation Portfolio | Multiple Sites, Northern California and Southern California, California | 2008-2019 | Task Lead Manager
Alicia prepared quarterly groundwater monitoring reports, subsurface investigation reports, sensitive receptor surveys, and preferential pathway studies for various California Department of Transportation locations throughout Northern California. She assisted with the utility locating, work plan preparation, field coordination, archived data onto the State Water Resource Control
Board’s (RWQCB) Geotracker electronic filing system. Alicia currently conducts site inspections for asbestos,
lead-based paint, and hazardous materials for bridges, salt barns, and maintenance buildings associated with California Department of Transportation locations throughout Southern California. The scope of work involves sample collection for asbestos and lead-based paint that would require special handling and disposal. She assists with the preparation of reports summarizing findings. Role: Task Lead Manager | Cost: Unknown | Dates involved: 06/2008-02/2019
Soil Gas Sampling and Human Health Risk Assessment | San Jose, California | 2014 | Project Lead
Alicia performed a soil vapor survey in conformance with the DTSC Advisory Active Soil Gas Investigations, using soil vapor sampling devices and a mobile laboratory for onsite chemical analysis. She also assisted with the report preparation summarizing the findings and providing recommendations for further assessment.
Confidential Client, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments | Multiple Sites, California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Virginia | Task Manager
Alicia performs Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for multiple confidential clients in accordance with the practices identified in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E 1527-13 and Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property, ASTM Designation E 2247-16 to achieve compliance with requirements of the “All Appropriate Inquiries” rule required to obtain protection from liability under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Cleanup and Liability Act (CERCLA). Previous sites include large industrial warehouses, multi-tenant commercial buildings, large lots of vacant land, and residential properties. She reviews topographic maps, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, and files at local regulatory agencies. She interviews present and former property owners and performed site and adjacent property reconnaissance. She prepares reports summarizing the findings and provides recommendations for further assessment if applicable. Cost: 3-8000 per report
Goodyear Portfolio | Northern California and Hawaii | 2005–present | Project Lead
Alicia performed Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) and Phase II Site Assessments for various Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company locations throughout California and Hawaii. She assisted with the installation of monitoring wells and exploratory borings; underground storage tank removals; site restoration; product removal with passive recovery system; archived data onto the State Water Resource Control Board’s Geotracker electronic filing system; and assisted with the preparation of quarterly groundwater monitoring reports, sensitive receptor surveys, site conceptual models, and subsurface investigation reports. Approximately 250 Sites • Cost: $8,000 per site.
Deborah J Hernandez
Geologic Staff
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Debbie is a staff geologist hired in September of 2018 at the San Bernardino Office. Through her education
at Cal Poly Pomona, Debbie has extensive research and writing experience while conducting thesis work.
Field experience ranges from field mapping, rock and soil classification to vast experience utilizing
geophysical equipment. Since starting at Stantec, Debbie has applied her knowledge towards Phase I and II
Environmental Assessment field work and report preparation. Debbie has also overseen soil vapor extraction
projects Debbie completed a GIS certification program through the California University Fullerton and is
experienced in ArcGIS 10, Adobe Suite, and the Microsoft Office Suite.
Debbie's environmental consulting experience includes performing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
in accordance with the practices identified in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process,
ASTM Designation E 1527-13, and the collection, and interpretation of Phase II Environmental Assessment
data.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Geological Sciences,
California Polytechnica University, Pomona,
Pomona, CA, 2015
CERTIFICATIONS & TRAINING
Geographic Information Systems, California State
University, Fullerton, Fullerton, California, 2018
Lead Sampling Technician, National Association
of Training and Environmental Consulting,
Anaheim, California, 2019
8-Hour Supervisor Trainer Coarse Certification
Hazwoper, OSHA, Simi Valley, California, 2018
Adult and Pediatric First Aid/CPR/AED, American
Red Cross, San Bernardino, Ca, 2018
Asbestos Building Inspector Initial Course,
National Association of Training and
Environmental Consulting, Anaheim, California,
2018
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Soil Vapor Intrusion Assessment/Mitigation
Studies (including Methane)
Soil Vapor Intrusion Assessment, Various
Locations, California
Debbie performed field oversight during the
installation of multiple soil vapor monitoring wells.
She assisted with health and safety oversight,
classified the soils during drilling activities and
assisted with the well installation and subsequent
soil vapor sampling.
Groundwater Supply / Wells
Humboldt Energy, Water Supply Assessment
Debbie coauthored a water supply assessment
report for a wind energy project located in
Humboldt County, California. Through research of
groundwater basins and geographic information
system analysis, she finalized a report used to
supplement the design and construction of over 60
wind turbines and ancillary facilities.
Deborah J Hernandez
Geologic Staff
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessments
Environmental Site Assessment, San Bernardino,
Ca
Debbie performed an onsite reconnaissance
survey, historical records investigation, and
formulated the report deliverable. The report
provided a thorough review of the property history
and defined present environmental concerns for
the client.
Aerial Mapping
Mars Data Analyst, JPL*, Pasadena, Ca (Geology
Intern)
Duties included mapping geologic safety hazards
using HiRISE, CTX and THEMIS images on
ArcGIS; analyzed rock classification and
distributions to downselect eight landing sites to
four. Characterized over 300 craters and their
respective ejecta blankets for potential landing
sites. Presented findings at the 2014 Geological
Society of America Conference, Abstract #249384
Joshua Sargent, PG
Project Geologist
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Joshua is a project geologist with a master’s degree in geological sciences. He has extensive field experience in geophysical exploration techniques and Phase I and II Environmental Assessment field work and report
preparation. His field experience includes subsurface gold-copper porphyry deposit mapping using induced
polarization and resistivity geophysics, mapping of shallow faults throughout Southern California using
refraction seismology equipment, soil logging and collection, soil vapor collection, and surface and
groundwater collection with basic flow measurements and parameter stabilization. He is skilled in using
ArcGIS 10, Adobe Suite, and the Microsoft Office Suite. Joshua’s environmental consulting experience
includes performing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments in accordance with the practices identified in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E 1527-13, and the
collection, and interpretation of Phase II Environmental Assessment data. Joshua also has experience in
preparing Phase II Environmental Assessment reports based from this compiled data.
EDUCATION
MS, Geological Sciences, California Polytechnic
State University, Pomona, California, 2014
BS, Geological Sciences, California Polytechnic
State University, Pomona, California, 2012
CERTIFICATIONS & TRAINING
8-Hour Supervisor Trainer Course Certification
Hazwoper Standard, OSHA, Redlands, California,
2015
8-Hour Refresher Course Hazwoper Standard (29 CFR 1910.120), OSHA, Redlands, California,
2015
First Aid and CPR Certification, American Safety,
Redlands, California, 2015
40-Hour Hazwoper, OSHA, Signal Hill, California,
2012 REGISTRATIONS
Professional Geologist #9730, State of California
MEMBERSHIPS
Member, Geological Society of America
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Health and Safety Management
Health and Safety Subcontractor Oversight
Services (Geological Staff)
Joshua has provided subcontractor oversight for
field activities including soil, soil vapor, and
groundwater sampling. Other field activities
include well destruction and on-site remediation.
Technical Writing
Various Technical Writing Projects (Geological
Staff)
Joshua prepares Health and Safety plans, written
permit applications, Phase I and Phase II
Environmental Site Assessments reports, Work
Plans dealing with soil, soil vapor, and
groundwater sampling, and groundwater
monitoring reports.
Joshua Sargent
Geologic Staff
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Environmental Site Assessments
Phase I Site Assessment, Redlands, California
(Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment, Author)
Joshua performed an on-site reconnaissance
survey, historical records investigation, and
formulated the report deliverable. The report
provided a thorough review of the property history
and defined present environmental concerns for
the client.
Soil Sampling
Dust and Pesticide Monitoring, Soil Sampling,
Monterey Park, California (Oversight, Dust and
Pesticide Monitoring, Soil Sampling)
Joshua performed field oversight during
contaminated soil removal at a future residential
community. Dust and toxaphene were monitored
simultaneously to generate a site-specific
threshold for dust concentration. Routine dust
monitoring was performed once the threshold was
determined. Property gridding and soil sampling
were performed to determine contamination.
Soil Vapor Intrusion Assessment
Soil Vapor Monitoring Well Installation, Various
Locations, California (Field Oversight, Soil
Description)
Joshua performed field oversight during the
installation of multiple soil vapor monitoring wells.
He assisted with health and safety oversight,
described the soil during drilling, activities,
assisted with the well installation, and conducted
the subsequent soil vapor sampling.
Environmental Site Remediation
Subcontractor Oversight Services and
Confirmation Soil Sampling (Geological Staff)
Joshua has provided subcontractor oversight for
remedial excavation of pesticide- and petroleum-
impacted soil, and later conducted confirmation
sampling to ensure all impacted material had been
removed from the Site.
Soil Vapor Remediation, Orange County,
California (Geological Staff)
Joshua has provided monthly operation and
maintenance on a soil vapor extraction system
operating at a historical landfill. Components of
the operation and maintenance included
measurements of the recovered vapor for
methane and volatile organic compounds, and
collecting flow measurements from the extraction
wells. Joshua prepared month operation and
maintenance reports.
Joshua Sargent
Geologic Staff
PUBLICATIONS
Sources of Fluids in Shallow Groundwater Near
Natural Gas Extraction – Weld, Adams, and
Boulder Counties, Colorado. Geological Society of
America Poster Presentation, Poster # 344-6,
Session # 344, Geological Society of America
125th Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 2013.
Sources of Fluids and Salinity in Shallow
Groundwater Near Natural Gas Extraction: Weld,
Adams, and Boulder Counties, Colorado.
Geological Sciences Department for California
Polytechnic State University Pomona, 2014.
Sources of Biogenic Methane in Shallow Aquifers,
Denver Julesburg Basin, Colorado. Applied
Geochemistry, 2015.
Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Kyle has more than 28 years of professional experience—17 of those years with Stantec—providing
geotechnical and environmental consulting. During the course of his experience, he has been involved with a
wide variety of geological and engineering projects. He has been in direct charge of quality control/quality
assurance (QA/QC) work for Stantec and previous firms for geological, engineering geological, and
environmental services primarily in California. Additionally, Kyle has been a primary contact for Stantec with
many different clients (including multi-party actions) and regulatory bodies involving contracting, workplan
approvals, site assessments and closures, permitting, remedial action, and litigation support. With regard to
litigation services, Kyle has extensive experience providing expert witness testimony, second-party review,
and litigation support and analysis.
Kyle's extensive experience includes assessment and remediation of property-specific and regional issues
involving soil and groundwater contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, heavy
metals, pesticides, and PCBs.
He currently serves as the managing principal geologist in Stantec's Redlands, California office.
EDUCATION
Engineering Geology/Hydrogeology, California
State University, Los Angeles, California, 1984
AS, General Science, Crafton Hills College,
Yucaipa, California, 1975
BS, Geological Sciences, California State
University, Long Beach, California, 1982
REGISTRATIONS
Certified Engineering Geologist #1271, State of
California Issued 1985, Expires 2011
Professional Geologist #4066, State of California
Issued 1985, Expires 2011
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Bioremediation
Excavation and Treatment of Petroleum-
Contaminated Soil
Kyle designed the excavation and treatment of
45,000 cubic yards of petroleum-contaminated
soil. Soil treatment included utilizing vapor
extraction, combined with bioremediation.
Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Chemicals & Polymers
Two Former Chemical Plants, Environmental Site
Assessments and Remediation, Vernon, California
Mr. Emerson was part of the team for conducting
Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site
Assessments (ESA) and developing remedial
action plans for two former chemical plant sites
with 80-year industrial histories. Phase I ESAs
used historical files, maps, aerial photographs,
available documents, and data from public
agencies and historical directories for identifying
recognized environmental concerns. Extensive
Phase II ESA survey activities aided in identifying
below-grade structures such as vaults/USTs, as
well as assessing the extent of influence and
nature of the contamination. These investigations
confirmed the presence of heavy metals,
petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic
compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, radioactive
materials, semi-volatile organic compounds, and
polycyclic aromatic compounds in the soils for
these sites. Specific areas of concern included
former settling ponds, a bone yard, maintenance
areas, transformer and substations, wastewater
treatment facilities, and above-ground storage
tank farms. A conceptual mode was developed for
use in a health risk assessment and developed
risk-based corrective actions to address potential
health and environmental concerns. He assisted
with the development and implementation of a
remedial action plan, combined administrative
controls, engineering controls, and active
remediation; this resulted in the cost-effective
return of one site to active use, and is reducing
health risks to occupants and the public at the
second site.
CONFIDENTIAL: Aerospace Adhesives and
Coatings Plant, Glendale, California
Mr. Emerson was part of the team that conducted
feasibility studies to evaluate remedial alternatives
for remediation of chlorinated VOCs, 1,4 dioxane,
and hexavalent chromium (CrVI) in soil, soil vapor,
and groundwater. Feasibility studies included
groundwater pump testing, benchscale column
testing to evaluate in situ alternatives for reducing
CrVI to the less mobile CrIII valence state, soil
vapor extraction, capping, and excavation. Field
pilot studies were performed to evaluate the
efficiency of various CrVI reductants including the
use of ferrous sulfate, calcium polysulfide,
emulsified oil, and fructose. Extensive multi-depth
soil vapor testing was conducted to evaluate the
distribution of VOCs in the subsurface and to
support vapor intrusion risk assessment.
Feasibility studies were completed in 2008.
Remedial actions are expected to be completed in
2011.
Condition Assessments
Assessment and Mitigation of Manufacturing
Facility
Kyle managed the assessment and mitigation of
an ammunition manufacturing facility covering
1,100 acres in a complex geologic environment.
The contaminates involved red and white
phosphorous, TNT, chlorinated solvents, solid
wastes, and live ordinance.
Soil Contamination Assessment Supervision and
Management
Kyle managed and supervised soil contamination
assessment and in-situ remediation of heavy
metals involving chromium, cadmium, nickel and
zinc by chemical fixation to depths in excess of 40
feet below ground surface beneath existing
structures within several manufacturing facilities.
Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Litigation Support and Expert Testimony
Kyle provided litigation support and expert
testimony on more than 20 separate projects
involving service stations, chlorinated solvent
cases, heavy metal, and semi-volatile releases.
Corporate / Office
Commercial Developer - Environmental
Remediation of Former Dry Cleaners, El Centro,
California
Mr. Emerson was responsible for assessments
and remediation at this former dry cleaners which
released the dry cleaning chemical
tetrachloroethene (PCE) to the ground and
underlying groundwater. The work included initial
site assessment, agency interaction and
negotiations with the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board (CRWQCB), and Colorado
Basin Region human health risk assessment
(HHRA), design and implementation of remedial
investigations, feasibility studies, remedial action
plans, and implementation of remediation in
mitigating chlorinated solvent contamination in
vadose and saturated zones at concentrations
indicative of DNAPL. The results of the completed
remediation, as well as continued confirmation
sampling and monitoring, allowed the CRWQCB to
issue site closure in 2008. The site has since been
redeveloped into a new commercial development.
Environmental Assessments
Siting Studies
Kyle performed initial siting studies for potential
Class I, II, and III landfills. The project included
detailed geologic mapping, hydrogeological
studies, and permeability studies of caps and
liners.
Environmental Site Remediation
Assessment and Remedial Design, California
(Project Supervisor)
Kyle supervised the assessment and remedial
design of a system to eliminate salt brine
contamination in shallow perched water horizons
in the Yucaipa, San Bernardino, and Riverside
areas of southern California.
Design and Installation of Recovery Systems*
Kyle designed and installed numerous free-
product recovery systems that successfully
recovered product. One of the sites contained
product up to 11-feet thick covering more than
three city blocks. The dissolved phase had
affected a multi-aquifer system and a public
drinking water system.
Geophysical Characterizations*
Kyle performed and supervised numerous
geophysical characterizations to determine the
extent of old landfills. He provided classification
studies, landfill gas monitoring, removal
verification during grading, methane collection and
mitigation plans, permitting, and closure plans.
Domestic Landfill Development*
Kyle designed and supervised the dynamic
consolidation of a domestic landfill for
development. He used this process to minimize
expected settlement to overlying structures. Kyle
designed commercial developments on closed
landfills that involved complex methane collection
and monitoring systems and building settlement
controls.
Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Clay Borrow Site Studies
Kyle performed more than 10 separate clay
borrow site studies for determining sources of
material to cap landfills; ranged from a 20-acre dry
lakebed to a 450-acre parcel in complex folded
marine sediments.
Assessment, Clean Up, and Regulatory Support
Management, Santa, Monica (Project Manager)
Kyle managed the assessment, clean up, and
complex regulatory support of a PRP site in an
MTBE case (Charnock subbasin). His work
involved more than 20 environmental
professionals working full time for two years to
complete the assessment and clean up mandated
by the regulatory agencies.
Hazardous Waste
San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, Remediation &
Closure of Multiple Source Areas, Industry,
California
Mr. Emerson performed feasibility studies to
evaluate appropriate and relevant remedial
alternatives to mitigate constituents of concern in
five AOCs contaminated with chlorinated
hydrocarbons, heavy metals, petroleum fuel, and
cutting oils. Ultimately, a combination of remedial
alternatives was implemented that included large-
diameter auger excavation to 45 feet to minimize
impacts on facility operations, vapor extraction,
vapor intrusion risk assessment, deed restriction,
and monitored natural attenuation. At the
completion of remedial actions, confirmation soil,
soil vapor, and groundwater sampling were
conducted and followed with risk assessment to
demonstrate that remedial objectives had been
achieved. No further action was recently granted
by the US EPA and Los Angeles Regional Water
Quality Control Board.
Mixed-Use
Port of San Diego Rohr Facility, Chula Vista,
California
Mr. Emerson assisted in a detailed subsurface
assessment of the Rohr facility. The intent of the
assessment was to evaluate the 40-acre former
aircraft part manufacturing facility for acquisition
by the Port of San Diego for redevelopment into a
business park and entertainment complex. The
assessment identified the presence of soil, soil
vapor, and groundwater impacts by petroleum
hydrocarbons, VOCs, heavy metals, PCBs, and
semi-volatile organic compounds. He utilized
many sampling techniques to assess the limits
and concentrations of contaminants in the
subsurface. Ultimately, the team was able to
develop a cost estimate for potential remedial
action cost associated to corrective action to allow
redevelopment.
Master Planned Commercial/Residential
Redevelopment Project, Whittier, California
(Project Manager)
Kyle oversaw the assessment of 26 contiguous
properties that are part of a 21-acre master
planned commercial/residential redevelopment
project. The properties included industrial facilities,
platting lines, fuel USTs, and metal processing
plants, among others. The estimated cleanup
costs are approximately $2 million.
Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Multi-Unit / Family Residential
Residential Development Assessment, Ventura,
California (Project Director)
Kyle directed an assessment of a 40-acre former
agricultural property proposed for residential
development. Pesticides were identified above
hazardous waste levels and preliminary
remediation goals established by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Through
corrective grading methods and onsite placement
of the pesticide impacted soils, all material were
re-used on site without offsite disposal. The over
all cost savings for the client was more than $1
million. Total cost was less than $250,000 for all
necessary activities.
Oil & Gas
Oil Field Site Assessments*
Kyle performed site assessments at oil field leases
involving refineries, bulk storage areas, piping
systems and wellhead, and drilling mud pit
contamination.
Environmental Protection Agency Superfund
Action, Culver City, California (Project Manager)
Kyle served as the project manager representing a
major oil company in the assessment, remedial
action, and litigation support in a multi-party
contamination case affecting a City water supply.
The assessment involved more than 250
continuous core borings up to 100 feet, as well as
extensive remedial actions. The total cost for all
related activities was $22 million. The case is
settled and the closure of the site is pending.
Project Management
Liability and Property Management Consulting
Services
Kyle is providing liability and property
management consulting services to more than 10
medium to large property development firms in the
US. His work involves property transaction
assessments, contract review, acquisition
guideline development, liability management
evaluation, insurance acquisition, and strategic
planning.
Residential Development
Environmental Development Management and
Review (Project Manager)
Kyle manages and reviews environmental
development issues for a large residential
developer specializing in development of
contaminated industrial properties by providing
innovative solutions in developing contaminated
properties for residential use through risk
assessment, engineering, and administrative and
property development controls.
Site Management and Remediation
Design and Implementation of Biodegradation
Programs*, California
Kyle designed and implemented one of the first in-
situ biodegradation programs in California; it
involved 50,000 cubic yards of diesel-
contaminated soils, and groundwater to depths of
70 feet below ground surface.
Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Soil and Groundwater Remediation Systems
Soil and Groundwater Contamination
Assessments and Mitigation*, California (Project
Manager)
Kyle managed numerous chlorinated solvent soil
and groundwater contamination assessments and
mitigation programs in southern California. The
projects involved releases that impacted soil and
groundwater to depth of groundwater more than
700 feet in multi-aquifer systems. One case
involved with plume dimensions more than 1 mile
from the source affecting residential properties.
Soil and Groundwater Assessment and
Remediation Programs*
Implemented hundreds of soil and groundwater
assessment and remediation programs at various
service station facilities in Southern and Northern
California, and Nevada. Work involved
assessment, remedial design, installation,
maintenance and monitoring. Closure has been
received on a majority of these sites.
Assessment and Remediation Management*
Kyle managed the assessment and remediation of
soil and groundwater manufacturing at dry
cleaning facilities contaminated with chlorinated
solvents.
Warehouse / Light Industrial
Glendale Redevelopment Project, Glendale,
California (Project Manager)
Kyle managed the assessment and remedial
actions during the redevelopment of and industrial
property. The project involved the demolition of a
historic manufacturing facility and a commercial
dry cleaner. Each of these facilities were
associated with releases of solvents and
petroleum hydrocarbons. Remedial actions
involved excavation by pattern drilling and off site
disposal along with removal of former USTs. The
total cost of remediation and assessment was
$450,000.00.
Compton Redevelopment Project, Compton,
California (Project Manager)
Kyle is serving as project manager for the
assessment and remedial actions for a large
redevelopment project. The project involves the
redevelopment of a historic manufacturing facility
and a former dry cleaner. Each of these facilities
were associated with releases of solvents and
petroleum hydrocarbons. The industrial facility was
also associated with significant volumes of buried
waste that required removal and disposal. These
wastes also included the chemical referenced
above, as well as PCBs and heavy metals.
Remediation has included excavation, vapor
extraction, and chemical fixation. The total cost of
this project has been $2.8 million to date.
Kyle D. Emerson PG, CEG
Managing Principal Geologist
PUBLICATIONS
In-Situ Bioremediation of an Underground Diesel
Fuel Spill: A Case Study. Environmental
Management, 1989.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Appendix C User Provided Records October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 C.1
Appendix C USER PROVIDED RECORDS
\\dc1\Data\BE Network\Residential\Active Deals\379 - Rosemead - Mission Drive - Mission Villas\Consultant Reports\Phase 1
& II\Phase I ESA User Questionnaire(ep).doc Stantec Consulting Services, Inc
PHASE I ESA USER’S QUESTIONNAIRE
In order to qualify for protection from land owner liability under CERCLA as an innocent landowner,
bona fide prospective purchaser, or contiguous property owner, ASTM standard practice E1527-13
and the federal AAI rule (40 CFR 312) require that the User of the Phase I ESA report provide
certain information (if available) to the Environmental Professional completing the assessment.
Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not
complete. Information that is not or cannot be provided to the Environmental Professional may be
identified as a “data gap” in the Phase I ESA report.
Please answer the following questions as completely as possible. Attach additional pages as
needed. Return the completed questionnaire to Stantec along with the executed Authorization For
services form.
1. Property Information
Property Name: Mission Villas
Property Address(es): 8601 Mission Blvd. Rosemead, California 91770
Property Owner Name: Corporation of Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints
Property Owner Phone #: contact David Knowlton at NIA Capital (Broker for Seller) at 949-
468-2307 for Seller contact information
2. Contact For Site Access
Name: David Knowlton
Company/Organization/Title: Broker for Seller
Phone # 949-468-2307 E-Mail Address: dknowlton@niacapital.com
3. Environmental Cleanup Liens. Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against
the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law?
__________ Yes _____X_____ No
If yes, describe or attach details of the lien
4. Activity and Land Use Limitations. Are you aware of any activity and use limitations, such as
engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls that are in place at the
property and/or have been filed or recorded as applicable to the property as a result of
environmental contamination, investigation, cleanup, or related matters?
__________ Yes _____X____ No
If yes, describe or attach details of the limitations
5. Specialized Knowledge or Experience. As the User of this ESA, do you have any
specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For
example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of
the property or an adjoining property, such that you would have specialized knowledge about
chemicals and processes used by this type of business?
__________ Yes _____X____ No
If yes, describe or attach details of your specialized knowledge or experience
6. Relationship of Purchase Price to Fair Market Value of Property. Does the purchase price
being paid for the property reasonably reflect the fair market value?
__X____Yes No
Not applicable. User is not involved in a purchase of the property.
If you conclude that there is a difference, do you have any reason to believe that the reduced
purchase price may be related to contamination known or believed to be present at the
property?
Yes, I have reason to believe that the purchase price for the property has
been reduced in comparison with the fair market value due to contamination known
or believed to be present at the property.
No, I have no reason to believe that the purchase price for the property
has been reduced in comparison with the fair market value due to contamination
known or believed to be present at the property.
7. Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information. Are you aware of commonly
known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the
Environmental Professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened
releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products? For example:
Do you know the past uses of the property?
Yes (describe)
____X____No
Do you know of chemicals, hazardous substances or petroleum products that are
present or once were present at the property?
Yes (describe)
____X____No
Do you know of spills or other releases of chemicals, hazardous substances or
petroleum products that have taken place at the property?
Yes (describe)
____X____No
Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property?
Yes (describe)
____X____No
8. The Degree of Obviousness of Contamination. E1527-13 and the federal AAI rule (40 CFR
312.31) require that the Phase I ESA consider the degree of obviousness of the presence or
likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination
by appropriate investigation. Based on your knowledge and experience related to the
property, are there any obvious indictors that point to the presence or likely presence of
contamination at the property?
Yes (describe)
____X____No
9. Availability of Previous Environmental Reports. Are you aware of previous environmental
site assessment reports, other environmental reports, documents, correspondence, etc.
concerning the property and its environmental condition?
Yes (describe)
_____X____No
Signature:
Name (printed):
Title:
Date:
Erik Pfahler
Senior Vice President
October 5, 2021
CLTA Preliminary Report Form Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
(Rev. 11/06) Page Number: 1
First American Title
First American Title Company
1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 200
Corona, CA 92879
Erik Pfhaler
Borstein Enterprises
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 810
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Customer Reference: Rosemead site
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Title Officer: Heather Pankey
Phone:
Fax No.:
E-Mail: hpankey@firstam.com
Buyer:
. Property: 8623 Mission Dr &, 8601 Mission Dr
Rosemead, CA
PRELIMINARY REPORT
In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, this company hereby reports that it is prepared to
issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not
shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and
Stipulations of said Policy forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set
forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the
exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in
Exhibit A. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report.
Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of
this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered.
It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land.
Please be advised that any provision contained in this document, or in a document that is attached, linked or referenced in this document, that under applicable law illegally discriminates against a class of individuals based
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 2
First American Title
upon personal characteristics such as race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, familial status,
disability, national origin, or any other legally protected class, is illegal and unenforceable by law.
This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of
title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 3
First American Title
Dated as of June 02, 2021 at 7:30 A.M.
The form of Policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is:
To Be Determined
A specific request should be made if another form or additional coverage is desired.
Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LATTER DAY SAINTS, A
UTAH CORPORATION SOLE, AS TO PARCEL 1;
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY
SAINTS, A UTAH CORPORATION SOLE, AS TO PARCEL 2; AND
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY
SAINTS, AS TO PARCEL 3
The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is:
A fee.
The Land referred to herein is described as follows:
(See attached Legal Description)
At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said
policy form would be as follows:
1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2021-2022, a lien not yet due or
payable.
2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75
of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.
3. All water developed thereon in excess of that which can be reasonably used for irrigation and
domestic use thereon, as reserved in Deed from San Marino Land Company, recorded in
Book 4179 Page 217 of Deeds.
4. An easement for Water mains and connections and incidental purposes, recorded in Book 4179 of
Deeds, Page 217.
In Favor of: San Marino Land Company
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 4
First American Title
Affects: As described therein
The location of the easement cannot be determined from record information.
5. Covenants, conditions and restrictions in the document recorded in Book 4179 of Deeds, Page 217,
but deleting any covenant, condition, or restriction, if any, indicating a preference, limitation, or
discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual
orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, veteran or military status, genetic
information, national origin, source of income as defined in subdivision (p) of Section 12955, or
ancestry, to the extent that such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate applicable state or
federal laws. Lawful restrictions under state and federal law on the age of occupants in senior
housing or housing for older persons shall not be construed as restrictions based on familial status.
6. An easement for Laying of and maintenance of water pipe and incidental purposes,
recorded November 05, 1936 as Book 14446, Page 314 of Official Records.
In Favor of: Ellinor M. Timm
Affects: As described therein
The location of the easement cannot be determined from record information.
7. An easement for An electric line, consisting of poles, necessary guys and anchors, cross-arms, wires
and other fixtures and appliances, for conveying electric energy to be used for light, heat, power,
telephone and/or other purposes and incidental purposes, recorded March 04, 1960 as Instrument
No. 1960-3377 of Official Records.
In Favor of: Southern California Edison Company, a corporation, its
successors and assigns
Affects: As described therein
8. An easement for Public road and highway purposes and incidental purposes, recorded July 30, 1971
as Instrument No. 1971-5248 of Official Records.
In Favor of: City of Rosemead
Affects: As described therein
9. An easement for Public road and highway purposes and incidental purposes, recorded February 03,
1972 as Instrument No. 1972-3016 of Official Records.
In Favor of: City of Rosemead
Affects: As described therein
10. Rights of the public in and to that portion of the Land lying within any Road, Street, Alley or Highway.
11. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the Public Records.
12. Rights of parties in possession.
Prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance, the Company will require:
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 5
First American Title
13. With respect to CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF
LATTER DAY-SAINTS, a Utah corporation Sole:
a. A certificate of good standing of recent date issued by the Secretary of State of the corporation's
state of domicile.
b. A certified copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the contemplated transaction
and designating which corporate officers shall have the power to execute on behalf of the
corporation.
c. Other requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the material required
herein and other information which the Company may require.
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 6
First American Title
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
Note: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less
than the certain dollar amount set forth in any applicable arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be
arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. If
you desire to review the terms of the policy, including any arbitration clause that may be included,
contact the office that issued this Commitment or Report to obtain a sample of the policy jacket for the
policy that is to be issued in connection with your transaction.
1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2020-2021.
First Installment: $543.68, PAID
Penalty: $0.00
Second Installment: $543.68, PAID
Penalty: $0.00
Tax Rate Area: 62-08216
A. P. No.: 5389-009-029
Affects: PARCEL 1
2. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2020-2021.
First Installment: $669.25, PAID
Penalty: $0.00
Second Installment: $669.25, PAID
Penalty: $0.00
Tax Rate Area: 62-08216
A. P. No.: 5389-009-030
Affects: PORTION OF PARCEL 2
3. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2020-2021.
First Installment: $665.80, PAID
Penalty: $0.00
Second Installment: $665.78, PAID
Penalty: $0.00
Tax Rate Area: 62-08225
A. P. No.: 5389-009-031
Affects: PORTION OF PARCEL 2 AND PARCEL 3
4. The property covered by this report is vacant land.
5. According to the public records, there has been no conveyance of the land within a period of twenty-
four months prior to the date of this report, except as follows:
None
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 7
First American Title
6. We find no outstanding voluntary liens of record affecting subject property. Disclosure should be
made concerning the existence of any unrecorded lien or other indebtedness which could give rise to
any possible security interest in the subject property.
The map attached, if any, may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. First American
expressly disclaims any liability for loss or damage which may result from reliance on this map except to
the extent coverage for such loss or damage is expressly provided by the terms and provisions of the title
insurance policy, if any, to which this map is attached.
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 8
First American Title
First American Title Company
1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 200
Corona, CA 92879 (951)256-5880
Fax - (909)476-2401
WIRE INSTRUCTIONS
for
First American Title Company, Demand/Draft Sub-Escrow Deposits
Riverside County, California
First American Trust, FSB
5 First American Way
Santa Ana, CA 92707
Banking Services: (877) 600-9473
ABA 122241255
Credit to First American Title Company
Account No. 3097840000
Reference Title Order Number 6612503 and Title Officer Heather Pankey
Please wire the day before recording.
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 9
First American Title
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described as
follows:
PARCEL 1: (APN: 5389-009-029)
THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY MAP
FILED IN BOOK 52 PAGE 27 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL WHICH IS
DISTANT NORTH 64° 21' 00" WEST 169.87 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHWEST LINE NORTH 64°
21' 00" WEST 60.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2;
THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 28° 53' 15" EAST
162.14 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE
ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 89° 02' 15" EAST 38.00
FEET TO A POINT IN THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE WHICH IS SOUTH 89° 02' 15"
WEST 86.80 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY IN A DIRECT LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2: (APNS: 5389-009-030 AND PORTION 5389-009-031)
THAT PORTION OF LOT 12 IN BLOCK 2 OF ROSEMEAD, IN THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 12 PAGE 194 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, DISTANT
THEREON NORTH 64° 21' 00" WEST 229.87 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 28° 53' 15" EAST 162.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 02' 15"
EAST, 124.80 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 00° 57' 45" WEST 457.92 FEET, MORE OR LESS,
TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO
THEODORE SWAN, RECORDED IN BOOK 14446 PAGE 314, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND
DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED, NORTH 64° 21' 00" WEST 194.56 FEET TO A POINT IN THE
EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S RIGHT OF
WAY, SHOWN AS PARCEL NO. 19 ON LICENSED SURVEYOR'S MAP FILED IN BOOK
30 PAGE 4, RECORD OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 00° 22' 01" EAST
254.20 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NO. 19;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND THE PROLONGATION
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 10
First American Title
THEREOF SOUTH 28° 53' 15" WEST, 399.39 FEET TO A POINT
IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE SOUTH 64° 21' 00" EAST 190.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
PARCEL 3: (APN: PORTION 5389-009-031)
THAT PORTION OF LOT 12 IN BLOCK 2 OF ROSEMEAD, IN THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 12 PAGE 194 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12, DISTANT
THEREON SOUTH 0° 35' 49" EAST 254.68 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 12; THENCE NORTH 64° 04' 21" WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT, A DISTANCE OF 194.56 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE
INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AS SHOWN ON MAP OF RECORDS OF
SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 30 PAGES 1 TO 7, INCLUSIVE OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89° 55' 39" EAST 173.95 FEET TO A
POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT DISTANT THEREON NORTH 0° 35' 49"
EAST 85.23 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0° 35' 49" WEST
85.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 11
First American Title
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 12
First American Title
NOTICE
Section 12413.1 of the California Insurance Code, effective January 1, 1990, requires that any title insurance
company, underwritten title company, or controlled escrow company handling funds in an escrow or sub-
escrow capacity, wait a specified number of days after depositing funds, before recording any documents in
connection with the transaction or disbursing funds. This statute allows for funds deposited by wire transfer
to be disbursed the same day as deposit. In the case of cashier's checks or certified checks, funds may be
disbursed the next day after deposit. In order to avoid unnecessary delays of three to seven days, or more,
please use wire transfer, cashier's checks, or certified checks whenever possible.
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 13
First American Title
EXHIBIT A
LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (BY POLICY TYPE)
CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY – 1990
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the
dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect
of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been
recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser
for value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured
claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under
this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the
land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction
creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws.
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART I
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by
reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments
on real property or by the public records.
Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public, records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of
the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the public records at Date of Policy.
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 14
First American Title
CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13) EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning:
a. building; b. zoning;
c. land use; d. improvements on the Land;
e. land division; and
f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27.
2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion
does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17.
4. Risks:
a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date;
c. that result in no loss to You; or
d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title.
6. Lack of a right:
a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21.
7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws.
8. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence.
9. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances.
LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows:
For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19, and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:
Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability
Covered Risk 16: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500 $10,000 (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 18: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000 $25,000 (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 19: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000 $25,000 (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 21: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500 $5,000 (whichever is less)
2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting,
or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land;
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 15
First American Title
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in
writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11,
13, or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the
lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy
and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b).
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from
Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
[Except as provided in Schedule B - Part II,[ t[or T]his policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs,
attorneys' fees or expenses, that arise by reason of: [PART I
[The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.
PART II
In addition to the matters set forth in Part I of this Schedule, the Title is subject to the following matters, and the Company insures against loss
or damage sustained in the event that they are not subordinate to the lien of the Insured Mortgage:]
2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys'
fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting,
or relating to
Order Number: NHSC-6612503 (hp)
Page Number: 16
First American Title
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in
writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or
10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the
Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy.
5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy
and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses, that arise by reason of: [The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from
Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.
7. [Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R's, etc. shown here.]
ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (07-26-10)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d),
First American Title
14 or 16.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in
writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11,
16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27 or 28); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business
laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. This Exclusion does not modify or limit
the coverage provided in Covered Risk 26. 6. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to Advances or modifications made after the
Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This
Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching subsequent to Date of
Policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11(b) or 25.
8. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion of it, to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 5 or 6.
9. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the
lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 27(b) of this policy.
10. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence.
11. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances.
Privacy Notice
Effective: October 1, 2019
Notice Last Updated: January 1, 2021
This Privacy Notice describes how First American Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates (together
referred to as “First American,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) collect, use, store, and share your information. This Privacy Notice
applies to information we receive from you offline only, as well as from third parties, when you interact with us and/or
use and access our services and products (“Products”). For more information about our privacy practices, including our
online practices, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy/. The practices described in this Privacy Notice are
subject to applicable laws in the places in which we operate.
What Type Of Information Do We Collect About You? We collect a variety of categories of information about you.
To learn more about the categories of information we collect, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy/.
How Do We Collect Your Information? We collect your information: (1) directly from you; (2) automatically when
you interact with us; and (3) from third parties, including business parties and affiliates.
How Do We Use Your Information? We may use your information in a variety of ways, including but not limited to
providing the services you have requested, fulfilling your transactions, comply with relevant laws and our policies, and
handling a claim. To learn more about how we may use your information, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacy-
policy/.
How Do We Share Your Information? We do not sell your personal information. We only share your information,
including to subsidiaries, affiliates, and to unaffiliated third parties: (1) with your consent; (2) in a business transfer; (3)
to service providers; and (4) for legal process and protection. To learn more about how we share your information, please
visit https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy/.
How Do We Store and Protect Your Information? The security of your information is important to us. That is why
we take commercially reasonable steps to make sure your information is protected. We use our best efforts to maintain
commercially reasonable technical, organizational, and physical safeguards, consistent with applicable law, to protect your
information.
How Long Do We Keep Your Information? We keep your information for as long as necessary in accordance with
the purpose for which it was collected, our business needs, and our legal and regulatory obligations.
Your Choices We provide you the ability to exercise certain controls and choices regarding our collection, use, storage,
and sharing of your information. You can learn more about your choices by visiting https://www.firstam.com/privacy-
policy/.
International Jurisdictions: Our Products are offered in the United States of America (US), and are subject to US
federal, state, and local law. If you are accessing the Products from another country, please be advised that you may be
transferring your information to us in the US, and you consent to that transfer and use of your information in accordance
with this Privacy Notice. You also agree to abide by the applicable laws of applicable US federal, state, and local laws
concerning your use of the Products, and your agreements with us.
We may change this Privacy Notice from time to time. Any and all changes to this Privacy Notice will be reflected on this
page, and where appropriate provided in person or by another electronic method. YOUR CONTINUED USE, ACCESS,
OR INTERACTION WITH OUR PRODUCTS OR YOUR CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS WITH US AFTER THIS
NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU WILL REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THIS
PRIVACY NOTICE.
Contact Us dataprivacy@firstam.com or toll free at 1-866-718-0097.
© 2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. NYSE:FAF
Form 10-PRIVACY20 (12-18-20) Page 1 of 2 Privacy Notice (2020 First American Financial Corporation)
English
For California Residents
If you are a California resident, you may have certain rights under California law, including but not limited to the
California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”). All phrases used in this section shall have the same meaning as those
phrases are used under California law, including the CCPA.
Right to Know. You have a right to request that we disclose the following information to you: (1) the categories of
personal information we have collected about or from you; (2) the categories of sources from which the personal
information was collected; (3) the business or commercial purpose for such collection and/or disclosure; (4) the
categories of third parties with whom we have shared your personal information; and (5) the specific pieces of your
personal information we have collected. To submit a verified request for this information, go to our online privacy
policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or call toll-free at 1-866-718-0097. You may also
designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at
www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or by calling toll-free at 1-866-718-0097.
Right of Deletion. You also have a right to request that we delete the personal information we have collected from
and about you. This right is subject to certain exceptions available under the CCPA and other applicable law. To submit a
verified request for deletion, go to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or
call toll-free at 1-866-718-0097. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going
to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or by calling toll-free at 1-866-718-
0097.
Verification Process. For either a request to know or delete, we will verify your identity before responding to your
request. To verify your identity, we will generally match the identifying information provided in your request with the
information we have on file about you. Depending on the sensitivity of the information requested, we may also utilize
more stringent verification methods to verify your identity, including but not limited to requesting additional information
from you and/or requiring you to sign a declaration under penalty of perjury.
Notice of Sale. We do not sell California resident information, nor have we sold California resident information in the
past 12 months. We have no actual knowledge of selling the information of minors under the age of 16.
Right of Non-Discrimination. You have a right to exercise your rights under California law, including under the CCPA,
without suffering discrimination. Accordingly, First American will not discriminate against you in any way if you choose to
exercise your rights under the CCPA.
Notice of Collection. To learn more about the categories of personal information we have collected about
California residents over the last 12 months, please see “What Information Do We Collect About You” in
https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy. To learn about the sources from which we have collected that information, the
business and commercial purpose for its collection, and the categories of third parties with whom we have shared that
information, please see “How Do We Collect Your Information”, “How Do We Use Your Information”, and “How Do We
Share Your Information” in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy.
Notice of Sale. We have not sold the personal information of California residents in the past 12 months.
Notice of Disclosure. To learn more about the categories of personal information we may have disclosed about
California residents in the past 12 months, please see “How Do We Use Your Information” and “How Do We Share Your
Information” in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy.
© 2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. NYSE:FAF
Form 10-PRIVACY20 (12-18-20) Page 2 of 2 Privacy Notice (2020 First American Financial Corporation)
English
Edison Lines
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Appendix D Environmental Agency Database Search Report October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 D.1
Appendix D ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY DATABASE SEARCH
REPORT
FORM-LBC-SPM
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Inquiry Number: 6684447.2s
September 30, 2021
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 9
Orphan Summary 162
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-8
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-9
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC6684447.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
8601 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
COORDINATES
34.0883260 - 34˚ 5’ 17.97’’Latitude (North):
118.0811900 - 118˚ 4’ 52.28’’Longitude (West):
Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator:
400253.4UTM X (Meters):
3772282.2UTM Y (Meters):
358 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
5630799 EL MONTE, CATarget Property Map:
2012Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20140515Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
6684447.2s Page 2
G36 RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY BLVD E LUST, Cortese, CERS Lower 2605, 0.493, South
G35 RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY HIST CORTESE Lower 2605, 0.493, South
34 KC CLEANERS 820 EAST MISSION ROA CPS-SLIC, CERS Higher 2596, 0.492, WNW
F33 ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD N LUST, SWEEPS UST, Cortese, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS,... Lower 2566, 0.486, SE
F32 ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD HIST CORTESE Lower 2566, 0.486, SE
E31 ALVAREZ. CHARLES & J 1425 DELTA HIST CORTESE Lower 2505, 0.474, SW
E30 ALVAREZ, CHARLES & J 1425 DELTA HIST CORTESE Lower 2505, 0.474, SW
D29 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY H 851 E GRAND AVE CPS-SLIC, WIP, CERS Higher 2382, 0.451, WNW
28 CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 927 E. GRAND AVENUE SWF/LF Higher 2327, 0.441, NW
D27 911 GRAND, SAN GABRI 911 GRAND WMUDS/SWAT Higher 2301, 0.436, WNW
C26 HUY FONG FOODS INC 5045 N EARLE AVE CPS-SLIC, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS Higher 2300, 0.436, NW
D25 CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 917 EAST GRAND AVENU SWF/LF, CERS Higher 2234, 0.423, WNW
24 TEXACO 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 2195, 0.416, ESE
D23 CITY OF SAN GABRIEL LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE Lower 2146, 0.406, WNW
C22 HUY FONG FOODS INC 5001 EARLE AVE CPS-SLIC, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS, HWTS Higher 2122, 0.402, NW
21 C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCH 4619 N ROSEMEAD BLVD CPS-SLIC, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS Lower 2100, 0.398, East
20 GORDON PEST CONTROL 4939 N EARLE AVE CPS-SLIC, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS Higher 1895, 0.359, NW
19 SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY W 8366 GRAND AVE E LUST, Cortese, CERS Higher 1672, 0.317, NW
18 E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE RCRA-SQG, LUST, CPS-SLIC, FINDS, Cortese, EMI,... Higher 1567, 0.297, NNW
A17 PACIFIC BELL (E1-625 8633 GRAND SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Higher 1069, 0.202, North
A16 PACIFIC BELL 8633 GRAND AVE RCRA-LQG Higher 1069, 0.202, North
A15 PACIFIC BELL ROSMCA8 8633 GRAND AVE UST Higher 1069, 0.202, North
A14 AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1 8633 E GRAND AVE CERS HAZ WASTE, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, WIP, CERS Higher 1069, 0.202, North
B13 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE AST, HAZNET, LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, CERS, HWTS Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE
B12 ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF 8657 GRAND AVE RCRA-SQG Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE
B11 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE
B10 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE
B9 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVENUE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE
B8 ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS 8657 GRAND AVE SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Higher 1032, 0.195, NNE
7 ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION 8533 E. GRAND AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 991, 0.188, NNW
6 PAMELA BROOKS 4809 MUSCATEL AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 919, 0.174, NE
A5 PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAI 8633 GRAND AVE CA FID UST Higher 862, 0.163, North
A4 SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE RCRA-SQG, UST, CERS HAZ WASTE, SWEEPS UST, FINDS,...Higher 794, 0.150, North
3 HOI KIM LI 4551 MUSCATEL AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 547, 0.104, East
2 HYTONE CLEANERS 4521 DUBONNET AVE EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 462, 0.087, SE
Reg SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( PECK RD & REAL NPL, SEMS, US ENG CONTROLS, ROD, PRP, CONSENT,... Same 2787, 0.528, ESE
Reg SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( MAIN ST & GAFIELD AV NPL, SEMS, PRP Same 3322, 0.629, NW
Reg SAN GABRIEL VALLEY AOCONCERN Same 2815, 0.533, East
1 1X LDS CHURCH 8601 MISSION DRIVE HAZNET, HWTS TP
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
8601 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
6684447.2s Page 3
39 JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCH 1358/1364 - 1374 EAS ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 4991, 0.945, North
38 GABRIELINO HIGH SCHO 1519 S. SAN GABRIEL ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 3605, 0.683, SW
37 GABRIELINO HIGH SCHO 1305/1311 SOUTH SAN ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 3051, 0.578, WSW
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
8601 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this
property see page 9 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:
EPA IDDatabase(s)Site
1X LDS CHURCH
8601 MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD, CA 90032
N/AHAZNET
GEPAID: CAC000214393
HWTS
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE State Response Sites
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycler Database
HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database
SCH School Property Evaluation Program
CDL Clandestine Drug Labs
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks
Local Land Records
LIENS Environmental Liens Listing
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
DEED Deed Restriction Listing
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System
LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing
MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan
CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List
DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities
EMI Emissions Inventory Data
ENF Enforcement Action Listing
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
ICE ICE
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS HMS: Street Number List
HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
MINES Mines Site Location Listing
MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing
NPDES NPDES Permits Listing
PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
PROC Certified Processors Database
Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records
LA Co. Site Mitigation Site Mitigation List
UIC UIC Listing
UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER)
WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
WDS Waste Discharge System
MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER)
PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER)
WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System
CERS CERS
NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER)
OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER)
PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER)
SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER)
WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: Also known as Superfund, the National Priority List database is a subset of CERCLIS and
identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program. The source of this database is
the U.S. EPA.
A review of the NPL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2021 has revealed that there are 2 NPL
sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( MAIN ST & GAFIELD AV NW 1/2 - 1 (0.629 mi.) 0 10
Cerclis ID:: 902093
EPA Id: CAD980818579
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( PECK RD & REAL ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.528 mi.) 0 17
Cerclis ID:: 901951
EPA Id: CAD980677355
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity
generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous
waste per month.
A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/22/2021 has revealed that there is 1
RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
PACIFIC BELL 8633 GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A16 97
EPA ID:: CAD980891725
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity
generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/22/2021 has revealed that there are 2
RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) A4 54
EPA ID:: CAD982491920
ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B12 82
EPA ID:: CAP000101139
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields
Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which
there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal
Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State
Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information
that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to,
identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where
environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk
characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at
contaminated sites.
A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/23/2021 has revealed that there are
3 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCH 1358/1364 - 1374 EAS N 1/2 - 1 (0.945 mi.) 39 157
Facility Id: 19820032
Status: Certified
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHO 1305/1311 SOUTH SAN WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.578 mi.) 37 147
Facility Id: 19820017
Status: No Further Action
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHO 1519 S. SAN GABRIEL SW 1/2 - 1 (0.683 mi.) 38 152
Facility Id: 60000801
Status: No Further Action
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid
waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Integrated Waste
Management Board’s Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database.
A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 SWF/LF sites within
approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 917 EAST GRAND AVENU WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.) D25 127
Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Facility ID: 19-AA-0004
Operational Status: Active
Regulation Status: Notification
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 927 E. GRAND AVENUE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) 28 133
Database: LOS ANGELES CO. LF, Date of Government Version: 07/09/2021
Site ID: 174
Status: Active
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the
Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in
California, with emphasis on groundwater.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 5 LUST sites within
approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.) 18 101
Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: I-03737
Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0603702935
Global ID: T0603702935
SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY W 8366 GRAND AVE E NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.317 mi.) 19 114
Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: R-13296
Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0603705187
Global ID: T0603705187
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
TEXACO 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) 24 123
Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: R-05784
Status: Leak being confirmed
Global Id: T0603704697
Global ID: T0603704697
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD N SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) F33 135
Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: R-01935
Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0603704579
Global ID: T0603704579
RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY BLVD E S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) G36 144
Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: I-11507
Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0603703806
Global ID: T0603703806
CPS-SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills,
Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data
management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with
emphasis on groundwater.
A review of the CPS-SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 7 CPS-SLIC sites
within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.) 18 101
Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: SL603799287
GORDON PEST CONTROL 4939 N EARLE AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.359 mi.) 20 117
Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: SL603799253
HUY FONG FOODS INC 5001 EARLE AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.402 mi.) C22 121
Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Status: Open - Inactive
Global Id: SL603799268
HUY FONG FOODS INC 5045 N EARLE AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.436 mi.) C26 130
Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: SL603799550
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY H 851 E GRAND AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.451 mi.) D29 134
Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Status: Open - Inactive
Global Id: SL603799257
KC CLEANERS 820 EAST MISSION ROA WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) 34 143
Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: T10000002256
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCH 4619 N ROSEMEAD BLVD E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.) 21 118
Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: SL603799546
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources
Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database.
A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 UST sites within
approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) A4 54
Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Id: 14099
PACIFIC BELL ROSMCA8 8633 GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A15 97
Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Id: 1005
AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations.
A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 AST site within
approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B13 85
Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT: The Waste Management Unit Database System is used for program tracking and inventory of
waste management units. The source is the State Water Resources Control Board.
A review of the WMUDS/SWAT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2000 has revealed that there is
1 WMUDS/SWAT site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
911 GRAND, SAN GABRI 911 GRAND WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.436 mi.) D27 132
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
AOCONCERN: San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by
region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of
lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government
Version: 7/17/2017
A review of the AOCONCERN list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 AOCONCERN site
within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY E 1/2 - 1 (0.533 mi.) 0 10
CERS HAZ WASTE: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site
Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household
Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs.
A review of the CERS HAZ WASTE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/19/2021 has revealed that there
are 2 CERS HAZ WASTE sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) A4 54
AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1 8633 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A14 94
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank
listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no
longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS
list.
A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are
3 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC 8626 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) A4 54
Status: A
Tank Status: A
Comp Number: 14099
ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B8 74
Status: A
Comp Number: 1008
PACIFIC BELL (E1-625 8633 GRAND N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A17 99
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14
Status: A
Tank Status: A
Comp Number: 1005
HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database.
A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 2
HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B8 74
Facility Id: 00000004976
PACIFIC BELL (E1-625 8633 GRAND N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A17 99
Facility Id: 00000016779
CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank
locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board.
A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there is
1 CA FID UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAI 8633 GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.163 mi.) A5 68
Facility Id: 19019407
Status: I
Status: A
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do
not presently generate hazardous waste.
A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/22/2021 has revealed that
there are 6 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
PAMELA BROOKS 4809 MUSCATEL AVE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.174 mi.) 6 69
EPA ID:: CAC002971799
ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION 8533 E. GRAND AVE NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.188 mi.) 7 71
EPA ID:: CAC002987586
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVENUE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B9 75
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B10 77
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 8657 GRAND AVE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.195 mi.) B11 80
EPA ID:: CAC003038381
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
HOI KIM LI 4551 MUSCATEL AVE E 0 - 1/8 (0.104 mi.) 3 52
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15
EPA ID:: CAC002986733
ROD: Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site
containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup.
A review of the ROD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2021 has revealed that there is 1 ROD
site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( PECK RD & REAL ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.528 mi.) 0 17
EPA ID:: CAD980677355
CONSENT: Major Legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL
(superfund) sites. Released periodically by U.S. District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation
matters.
A review of the CONSENT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/30/2021 has revealed that there is 1
CONSENT site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ( PECK RD & REAL ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.528 mi.) 0 17
Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST),
the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites).
A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/17/2021 has revealed that there are 5
Cortese sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.) 18 101
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY W 8366 GRAND AVE E NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.317 mi.) 19 114
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
TEXACO 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) 24 123
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD N SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) F33 135
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY BLVD E S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) G36 144
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16
HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST],
the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This
listing is no longer updated by the state agency.
A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there
are 6 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
E T C CARPET MILLS 5012 WALNUT GROVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.) 18 101
Reg Id: I-03737
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
TEXACO 4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) 24 123
Reg Id: R-05784
ALVAREZ, CHARLES & J 1425 DELTA SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) E30 135
Reg Id: 6A189011N04
ALVAREZ. CHARLES & J 1425 DELTA SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) E31 135
Reg Id: 6A189011N05
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENT 4251 ROSEMEAD SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) F32 135
Reg Id: R-01935
RELIABLE LUMBER INC 8614 VALLEY S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) G35 144
Reg Id: I-11507
WIP: Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area.
A review of the WIP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/03/2009 has revealed that there is 1 WIP
site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1 8633 E GRAND AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) A14 94
Facility Status: Backlog
LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles
County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles
County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from
a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records
from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health
A review of the LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/04/2021 has revealed
that there is 1 LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target
property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.406 mi.) D23 123
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected
listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to
those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories
reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash
& dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical
Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and
operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records
searches.
A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist
Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
HYTONE CLEANERS 4521 DUBONNET AVE SE 0 - 1/8 (0.087 mi.) 2 51
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6684447.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 3 records.
Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________
ROSEMEAD EXTENDION RECYCLED WATER CIWQS
ROSEMEAD RETAIL CIWQS
WALNUT GROVE AVENUE AND RUSH STREE LDS
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.60 kV4 4 0 40 0
400
4 0 0
4 0 0
3 6 0 3603 6 0 36 032032 0 3203 2 0320
280
280
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
360
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
2 NR 2 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS
Federal Delisted NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Federal CERCLIS list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Federal RCRA generators list
1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
3 NR 3 0 0 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
2 NR NR 2 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
5 NR NR 5 0 0 0.500LUST
TC6684447.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
7 NR NR 7 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250UST
1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
State and tribal Brownfields sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAULERS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000AOCONCERN
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL
2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250CERS HAZ WASTE
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PFAS
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
3 NR NR NR 3 0 0.250SWEEPS UST
2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250HIST UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CERS TANKS
1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250CA FID UST
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS
TC6684447.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCHMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLDS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMCS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90
Other Ascertainable Records
6 NR NR NR 5 1 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN
5 NR NR 5 0 0 0.500Cortese
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings
TC6684447.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEMI
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPENF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance
1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1HAZNET
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICE
6 NR NR 6 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLOS ANGELES CO. HMS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPEST LIC
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLA Co. Site Mitigation
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC GEO
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDS
1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250WIP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMILITARY PRIV SITES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPROJECT
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCIWQS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNON-CASE INFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPOTHER OIL GAS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPROD WATER PONDS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSAMPLING POINT
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWELL STIM PROJ
1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1HWTS
1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMINES MRDS
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST
59 0 8 27 20 2 2- Totals --
TC6684447.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6684447.2s Page 8
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
--, 99 --City,State,Zip:
Not reportedContact Address 2:
--Contact Address:
JEFF RAWLAND, ARCHITECT COORD.Contact Name:
--, 99 --Owner City,State,Zip:
Not reportedOwner Address 2:
--Owner Address:
LDS CHURCHOwner Name:
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841500000Mailing City,State,Zip:
Not reportedMailing Address 2:
--Mailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
10/25/2000Last Act Date:
10/23/1989Create Date:
10/25/2000Inactive Date:
CAC000214393EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 900320000City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
8601 MISSION DRIVEAddress:
1X LDS CHURCHName:
HWTS:
13.29Tons:
D80 - Disposal, Land FillDisposal Method:
151 - Asbestos containing wasteCA Waste Code:
AZC000000150TSD EPA ID:
CAC000214393Gepaid:
1989Year:
0.025Tons:
03 -Disposal Method:
-CA Waste Code:
CAD067786749TSD EPA ID:
CAC000214393Gepaid:
1990Year:
--Mailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
8014662223Telephone:
JEFF RAWLAND, ARCHITECT COORD.Contact:
ROSEMEAD, CA 900320000City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
8601 MISSION DRIVEAddress:
1X LDS CHURCHName:
HAZNET:
Actual:
358 ft.
Property ROSEMEAD, CA 90032
Target HWTS8601 MISSION DRIVE N/A
1 HAZNET1X LDS CHURCH S123721033
TC6684447.2s Page 9
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office.
San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above theDescription:
AOC:
2815 ft.
1/2-1
East BALDWIN PARK, CA
Concern N/A
Areas of AOCONCERNSAN GABRIEL VALLEY CCA0000001
The State Department of Health Services and EPA are preparing to initiate a
will begin soon to get a snapshot view of the degree of contamination.
Status June 1984): A supplemental sampling program of contaminated wells
level below 5 ppb are not effective, wells are removed from service.
safe for human consumption. When alternative methods of reducing the TCE
supplies contain less than 5 parts billion ppb) of TCE, a level considered
and public water companies in the area have tested to ensure that their water
SNARL) for TCE and PCE. Approximately 100,000 people are affected. Cities
public wells in the area exceedthe EPA Suggested No Adverse Response Levels
PCE), according to analyses by State agencies and local water companies. Many
water is contaminated with trichloroethylene TCE) and perchloroethylene
California. The plume is about 2 miles long and 1 mile wide. Ground
Creek in the San Gabriel ground water basin in Alhambra, Los Angeles County,
ground water plume that runs along the axis of the west fork of the Alhambra
Conditions at listing September 1983): San Gabriel Valley Area 3) is a
Summary Details:
4Scoring:
GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway:
TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE)Substance:
79-01-6CAS Number:
U228Substance ID:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
Not reportedScoring:
Not reportedPathway:
Not reportedSubstance:
Not reportedCAS Number:
Not reportedSubstance ID:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
NPL:
28.899999999999999Site Score:
-118.125Longitude:
34.1Latitude:
1984-05-08 00:00:00Final Date:
NFederal:
ALHAMBRA, CA 91801City,State,Zip:
MAIN ST & GAFIELD AVEAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Name:
902093Site ID:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
9EPA Region:
NPL:
3322 ft.
1/2-1
NW PRPALHAMBRA, CA 91801
Region SEMSMAIN ST & GAFIELD AVE CAD980818579
NPL NPLSAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)1000114962
TC6684447.2s Page 10
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
SEMS Detail:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL:
NFF:
-118.125000Longitude:
+34.100000Latitude:
06037FIPS Code:
27,31Cong District:
ALHAMBRA, CA 91801City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
MAIN ST & GAFIELD AVEAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
SEMS:
FinalNPL Status:
Not reportedDeleted Date:
05/08/1984Final Date:
09/08/1983Proposed Date:
NPL:
09/08/83Date Proposed:
05/08/84Date Finalized:
Not reportedDate Deleted:
NFederal Site:
FSite Status:
0902093Site ID:
09EPA Region:
NPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)NPL Name:
NPL:
10Category Value:
Distance To Nearest Population-> 0 And <= 1/4 MileCategory Description:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1Category Value:
Depth To Aquifer-<= 10 FeetCategory Description:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
NPL:
serious problem that required taking immediate remedial action.
Gabriel Valley sites,was added to the NPL in May 1984 because it involves a
sources of the contamination. This site, along with the three other San
management of the problem. EPA continues its investigation to identify
extent of contamination and to develop alternatives for treatment and
remedial investigation/ feasibility study to determine the aerial and vertical
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962
TC6684447.2s Page 11
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/31/2004 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2004-05-31 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
CIAction Name:
CRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
2/18/2016 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2009-06-09 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
AIR SRVYAction Name:
ASAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
HQual:
9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-09-01 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
PAAction Name:
PAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/8/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-09-08 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
PROPOSEDAction Name:
NPAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962
TC6684447.2s Page 12
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2006-11-01 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
TA GRANTAction Name:
TGAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
10/21/2008 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2005-09-26 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
EE/CAAction Name:
EEAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2003-03-20 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
ADMIN RECAction Name:
ARAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/8/1984 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1984-05-08 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
NPL FINLAction Name:
NFAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962
TC6684447.2s Page 13
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
2SEQ:
SIAction Name:
SIAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
1984-05-01 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
CIAction Name:
CRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
12/27/1991 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1991-12-27 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RV ASSESSAction Name:
RSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-09-01 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
HAZRANKAction Name:
HRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962
TC6684447.2s Page 14
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2018-04-08 05:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
ST COOPAction Name:
MAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
1999-07-12 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RI/FSAction Name:
COAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
1/24/2020 6:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2020-01-24 06:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
RV ASSESSAction Name:
RSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
HQual:
9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-03-01 05:00:00Start Date:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962
TC6684447.2s Page 15
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
A&E PLASTICS CO.
A & J SYSTEMSPRP Name:
PRP:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
6/30/2010 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2006-09-18 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
ST COOPAction Name:
MAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
HQual:
9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-03-01 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
SIAction Name:
SIAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
4/1/1980 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1980-04-01 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
DISCVRYAction Name:
DSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3)Site Name:
CAD980818579EPA ID:
0902093Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
SQual:
1/29/2020 6:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2020-01-24 06:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RMVLAction Name:
RVAction Code:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962
TC6684447.2s Page 16
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
169 additional PRP: record(s) in the EDR Site Report.
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
AREMAC HEAT TREATING,INC.
AREMAC ASSOCIATES
ARCADIA MACHINE AND TOOL
ANDREW WREN
AMERICAN SHEDS INC.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.
ALLIED PHOTO PRODUCTS INC.
ALLFAST FASTENING SYSTEMS, INC.
AIR DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS, INC.
AEROSOL SERVICES COMPANY
AEROJET-GENERAL CORP.
AEROJET ELECTROSYSTEMS
ADVANCED HEAT TECHNOLOGY CORP.
ADAMS CAMPBELL CO., LTD.
ADAMS AND COLTRIN, INC.
ACROMIL
ACORN ENGINEERING CO.
A-1 ORNAMENTAL IRON
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 3) (Continued) 1000114962
4Scoring:
GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway:
CHLOROFORMSubstance:
67-66-3CAS Number:
U044Substance ID:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
Not reportedScoring:
Not reportedPathway:
Not reportedSubstance:
Not reportedCAS Number:
Not reportedSubstance ID:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
NPL:
42.240000000000002Site Score:
-118Longitude:
34.125Latitude:
1984-05-08 00:00:00Final Date:
NFederal:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
901951Site ID:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
9EPA Region:
NPL:
ECHO
FINDS
CONSENT
2787 ft.PRP
1/2-1 ROD
ESE US ENG CONTROLSEL MONTE, CA 91733
Region SEMSPECK RD & REAL CAD980677355
NPL NPLSAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 17
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)NPL Name:
NPL:
10Category Value:
Distance To Nearest Population-> 0 And <= 1/4 MileCategory Description:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
135Category Value:
Depth To Aquifer-> 100 FeetCategory Description:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
NPL:
serious problem that required taking immediate remedial action.
Gabriel Valley sites, was added to the NPL in May 1984 because it involves a
sources of contamination. This site, along with the three other San
management of the problem. EPA continues its investigation to identify
extent of contamination and to develop alternatives for treatment and
remedial investigation/feasibility study to determine the aerial and vertical
The State Department of Health Services and EPA arepreparing to initiate a
will begin soon to get a snapshot view of the degree of contamination.
the system soon. A supplemental sampling program of contaminated wells
company has already purchased a treatment system and will begin operation of
water to two of the three companies that have no alternate supply. The third
in December l983, EPA will install water treatment systems to provide clean
1984): As a result of EPA s analysis of initial remedial measures, completed
and have advised their customers to use bottled water. Status June
Currently, three small mutual water companies have no alternate water supply
below such levels are not effective, wells are removed from service.
consumption. When alternative methods of reducing the TCE and PCE levels
billion ppb) of TCE and 4 ppb PCE, levels considered safe for human
have tested to ensure that their water supplies contain less than 5 parts per
200,000 people are affected. Cities and public water companies in the area
Suggested No Adverse Response Levels SNARL) for TCE and PCE. Approximately
local water companies. Many public wells in this area exceed the EPA
and carbon tetrachloride CTC) according to analyses by State agencies and
water is contaminated with trichloroethylene TCE), perchloroethylene PCE),
east. It is approximately 4 miles long and 1.5 miles wide. Ground
County, California. The plume also parallels the San Gabriel River to the
Pit Wash in the San Gabriel ground water basin in El Monte, Los Angeles
ground water plume that runs along the axis of the Rio Hondo Wash and the Salt
Conditions at listing September 1983): San Gabriel Valley Area 1) is a
Summary Details:
2Scoring:
GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway:
TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE)Substance:
79-01-6CAS Number:
U228Substance ID:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2Scoring:
GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway:
TETRACHLOROETHENESubstance:
127-18-4CAS Number:
U210Substance ID:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 18
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
RV ASSESSAction Name:
RSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
IRQual:
9/30/2003 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2000-09-27 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
RAAction Name:
RAAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
SEMS Detail:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL:
NFF:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
06037FIPS Code:
28,31,38Cong District:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
SEMS:
FinalNPL Status:
Not reportedDeleted Date:
05/08/1984Final Date:
09/08/1983Proposed Date:
NPL:
09/08/83Date Proposed:
05/08/84Date Finalized:
Not reportedDate Deleted:
NFederal Site:
FSite Status:
0901951Site ID:
09EPA Region:
NPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 19
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
4/1/1980 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1980-04-01 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
DISCVRYAction Name:
DSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
3/31/1993 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1987-04-01 05:00:00Start Date:
5SEQ:
RI/FSAction Name:
COAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/29/1988 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1987-04-01 05:00:00Start Date:
4SEQ:
RI/FSAction Name:
COAction Code:
04OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
12/27/1991 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1991-12-27 05:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 20
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/16/2003 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2003-05-16 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
O AND FAction Name:
OFAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
HQual:
9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-09-01 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
PAAction Name:
PAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/28/2006 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2006-09-28 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
5 YEARAction Name:
FEAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2000-09-28 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
CIAction Name:
CRAction Code:
00OU:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 21
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2006-06-21 04:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
CIAction Name:
CRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
3/29/1989 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1988-05-25 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RAAction Name:
RAAction Code:
03OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/14/2011 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2011-09-14 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
5 YEARAction Name:
FEAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/16/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2003-05-16 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
LT RESPAction Name:
LRAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 22
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
6/25/1991 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1991-06-25 04:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
ADMIN RECAction Name:
ARAction Code:
04OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
8/16/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2008-08-07 05:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
RAAction Name:
RAAction Code:
05OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/30/2016 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2015-10-07 05:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
5 YEARAction Name:
FEAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/11/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2012-09-26 05:00:00Start Date:
4SEQ:
5 YEARAction Name:
FEAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 23
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
ADMIN RECAction Name:
ARAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
1984-05-01 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
CIAction Name:
CRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
HQual:
9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-03-01 05:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
SIAction Name:
SIAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
11/10/1999 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1997-03-27 05:00:00Start Date:
6SEQ:
RI/FSAction Name:
COAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
EQual:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 24
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
1993-04-28 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
GWTRMONAction Name:
GMAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/16/1992 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1992-09-16 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
ECO RISKAction Name:
JFAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/8/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-09-08 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
PROPOSEDAction Name:
NPAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
1993-08-25 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 25
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2013-07-01 05:00:00Start Date:
4SEQ:
RAAction Name:
RAAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
7/1/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2012-08-12 04:00:00Start Date:
5SEQ:
RDAction Name:
RDAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/29/2000 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2000-09-29 04:00:00Start Date:
6SEQ:
RODAction Name:
ROAction Code:
05OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/19/1990 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1990-09-19 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RV ASSESSAction Name:
RSAction Code:
00OU:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 26
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
1989-09-15 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
TECH ASSISTAction Name:
TAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-09-01 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
HAZRANKAction Name:
HRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
EQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
1989-03-02 05:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
ADMIN RECAction Name:
ARAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
3/31/2006 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1988-01-12 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
ST COOPAction Name:
MAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 27
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
7/18/1991 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1988-09-14 04:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
RDAction Name:
RDAction Code:
04OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
3/29/2002 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1999-04-05 04:00:00Start Date:
4SEQ:
RDAction Name:
RDAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/29/1988 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1988-09-29 04:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
RODAction Name:
ROAction Code:
04OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/11/1984 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1984-05-11 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RODAction Name:
ROAction Code:
03OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 28
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
RODAction Name:
ROAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/11/1984 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-06-13 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RI/FSAction Name:
COAction Code:
03OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/8/1984 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1984-05-08 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
NPL FINLAction Name:
NFAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/16/1992 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1992-09-16 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
R/H ASMTAction Name:
EDAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 29
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
6/13/1991 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1988-09-14 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
RDAction Name:
RDAction Code:
04OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
2/4/1988 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1985-09-30 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RDAction Name:
RDAction Code:
03OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
6/23/1999 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1999-06-23 04:00:00Start Date:
5SEQ:
RODAction Name:
ROAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
3/31/1993 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1993-03-31 05:00:00Start Date:
4SEQ:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 30
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2020-11-24 06:00:00Start Date:
5SEQ:
5 YEARAction Name:
FEAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
11/1/2019 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2010-07-14 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RIAction Name:
RIAction Code:
05OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2013-05-10 05:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
LT RESPAction Name:
LRAction Code:
05OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2000-09-29 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
GWTRMONAction Name:
GMAction Code:
05OU:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 31
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2016-02-25 05:00:00Start Date:
10SEQ:
RI/FSAction Name:
COAction Code:
05OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2012-12-13 05:00:00Start Date:
6SEQ:
CIAction Name:
CRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2011-12-22 05:00:00Start Date:
5SEQ:
CIAction Name:
CRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2011-12-22 05:00:00Start Date:
4SEQ:
CIAction Name:
CRAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 32
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
8/16/2013 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2003-09-22 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
PRP RDAction Name:
BEAction Code:
05OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2019-08-01 05:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
TECH ASSISTAction Name:
TAAction Code:
07OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2010-10-07 04:00:00Start Date:
4SEQ:
ST COOPAction Name:
MAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2020-02-13 06:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
FPA/MAAction Name:
FMAction Code:
08OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 33
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
PRP RDAction Name:
BEAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/22/2010 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2003-11-14 05:00:00Start Date:
7SEQ:
PRP RDAction Name:
BEAction Code:
08OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
2/9/2010 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2003-11-14 05:00:00Start Date:
4SEQ:
PRP RDAction Name:
BEAction Code:
09OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/13/2008 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2003-11-14 05:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
PRP RDAction Name:
BEAction Code:
08OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 34
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2016-11-08 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
PRP LRAction Name:
MEAction Code:
08OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/29/2000 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1995-07-25 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
PRP RI/FSAction Name:
BDAction Code:
05OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
6/23/1999 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1995-03-16 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
PRP RI/FSAction Name:
BDAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
4/28/2005 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2003-11-14 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 35
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2013-05-16 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
OMAction Name:
OMAction Code:
02OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
2/19/2020 6:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2010-09-22 04:00:00Start Date:
6SEQ:
PRP RAAction Name:
BFAction Code:
08OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
2/19/2020 6:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2008-05-13 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
PRP RAAction Name:
BFAction Code:
08OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
EPA OvrsghtCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
Not reportedFinish Date:
2016-11-08 05:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
PRP LRAction Name:
MEAction Code:
09OU:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 36
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
5/25/1998 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1990-04-16 04:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
LT RESPAction Name:
LRAction Code:
03OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
9/30/1990 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1985-09-30 05:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
RI/FSAction Name:
COAction Code:
01OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
6/30/2010 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2006-09-18 04:00:00Start Date:
3SEQ:
ST COOPAction Name:
MAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
Not reportedQual:
6/30/2010 5:00:00 AMFinish Date:
2006-09-18 04:00:00Start Date:
2SEQ:
ST COOPAction Name:
MAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 37
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1993Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
03/31/1993Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
02Operable Unit:
4Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
Media:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2006Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
05Operable Unit:
2Action ID:
Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
11/10/2005Action Taken Date:
Not reportedEvent Code:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
SIte:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
HQual:
9/1/1983 4:00:00 AMFinish Date:
1983-03-01 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
SIAction Name:
SIAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
FNPL:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Site Name:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
0901951Site ID:
09Region:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 38
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedEvent Code:
08/22/2002Action Taken Date:
Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2002Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
08/22/2002Action Taken Date:
Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1984Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
05/11/1984Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
03Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2000Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
11/10/1999Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
02Operable Unit:
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 39
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2006Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
11/10/2005Action Taken Date:
Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name:
05Operable Unit:
2Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2006Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
11/10/2005Action Taken Date:
Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name:
05Operable Unit:
2Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2002Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
08/22/2002Action Taken Date:
Explanation of Significant DifferencesAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2002Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 40
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1993Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/22/1993Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
04Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1993Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/22/1993Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
04Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1993Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/22/1993Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
04Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 41
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
11/10/1999Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
02Operable Unit:
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2000Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
11/10/1999Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
02Operable Unit:
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1987Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/30/1987Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
03Operable Unit:
2Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1993Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/22/1993Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
04Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 42
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1984Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
05/11/1984Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
03Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2000Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
11/10/1999Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
02Operable Unit:
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2000Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
11/10/1999Action Taken Date:
ROD AmendmentAction Name:
02Operable Unit:
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2000Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 43
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1988Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/29/1988Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
04Operable Unit:
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1988Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/29/1988Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
04Operable Unit:
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1984Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
05/11/1984Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
03Operable Unit:
1Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 44
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
06/23/1999Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
5Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1999Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
06/23/1999Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
5Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1988Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/29/1988Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
04Operable Unit:
3Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1988Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/29/1988Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
04Operable Unit:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 45
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1999Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
06/23/1999Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
5Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1999Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
06/23/1999Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
5Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1999Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
06/23/1999Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
5Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1999Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 46
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
05Operable Unit:
6Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2000Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/29/2000Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
05Operable Unit:
6Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1999Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
06/23/1999Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
5Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
1999Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
06/23/1999Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
01Operable Unit:
5Action ID:
GroundwaterContaminated Media:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
-118.000000Longitude:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 47
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
1993-03-31 00:00:00Action Completion:
4SEQ ID:
WHITTIER-NARROWSOperable Unit Number:
GOVT Decision Document (ROD)Action:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
1988-09-29 00:00:00Action Completion:
3SEQ ID:
SUBURBANOperable Unit Number:
GOVT Decision Document (ROD)Action:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
1984-05-11 00:00:00Action Completion:
1SEQ ID:
RICHWOOD WATER COMPANYOperable Unit Number:
GOVT Decision Document (ROD)Action:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
ROD:
-118.000000Longitude:
+34.125000Latitude:
NSuperfund Alternative Agreement:
Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status:
2000Fiscal Year:
NFederal Facility:
Not reportedEvent:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact Name:
Not reportedEvent Code:
09/29/2000Action Taken Date:
Record of DecisionAction Name:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 48
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
WHITTIER-NARROWSOperable Unit Number:
GOVT ROD AmendmentAction:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
1987-09-30 00:00:00Action Completion:
2SEQ ID:
RICHWOOD WATER COMPANYOperable Unit Number:
GOVT ROD AmendmentAction:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
1993-09-22 00:00:00Action Completion:
1SEQ ID:
SUBURBANOperable Unit Number:
GOVT ROD AmendmentAction:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
2005-11-10 00:00:00Action Completion:
2SEQ ID:
SOUTH EL MONTEOperable Unit Number:
GOVT ESDAction:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
2002-08-22 00:00:00Action Completion:
1SEQ ID:
EL MONTEOperable Unit Number:
GOVT ESDAction:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 49
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CONSENT:
482 additional PRP: record(s) in the EDR Site Report.
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
AIR DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS, INC.
AIR DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS, INC.
AEROSOL SERVICES COMPANY
AEROJET-GENERAL CORP.
AEROJET-GENERAL CORP.
AEROJET-GENERAL CORP.
AEROJET ELECTROSYSTEMS
ADVANCED HEAT TECHNOLOGY CORP.
ADAMS FAMILY TRUST
ADAMS AND COLTRIN, INC.
ADAMS AND CAMPBELL COMPANY LTD.
ACROMIL
ACORN ENGINEERING CO.
ABERCROMBIE, DEANNA
A-1 ORNAMENTAL IRON
A&E PLASTICS CO.
A & L MOTOR PARTS, INC.
A & J SYSTEMS
A & B BUS COMPANY
A & A SCREW PRODUCTSPRP Name:
PRP:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
2000-09-29 00:00:00Action Completion:
6SEQ ID:
SOUTH EL MONTEOperable Unit Number:
GOVT ROD for PRP RemedyAction:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
1999-06-23 00:00:00Action Completion:
5SEQ ID:
EL MONTEOperable Unit Number:
GOVT ROD for PRP RemedyAction:
901951Site ID:
9RG:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
Not reportedNon NPL Status:
FinalNPL Status:
1999-11-10 00:00:00Action Completion:
3SEQ ID:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
TC6684447.2s Page 50
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110009329538DFR URL:
110009329538Registry ID:
1000114959Envid:
ECHO:
additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report.
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring.
that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include;
has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region
that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also
Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate
it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit
information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and
Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This
a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all
replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with
information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to
complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance
Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when
ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated
SUPERFUND NPL
Environmental Interest/Information System:
Click Here:
110009329538Registry ID:
FINDS:
LOS ANGELESCounty:
EL MONTE, CA 91733City,State,Zip:
PECK RD & REALAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1)Name:
IN THE MATTER OF: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY SUPERFUND SIName:
Not reportedEntered Date:
Not reportedDistrict:
Not reportedCourt Num:
Not reportedCase Title:
Not reportedSite ID:
CAD980677355EPA ID:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 1) (Continued) 1000114959
Laundry And Drycleaner Agents2013 HYTONE CLEANERS
Type:Year: Name:
EDR Hist Cleaner
462 ft.
0.087 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
352 ft.
< 1/8 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
SE 4521 DUBONNET AVE N/A
2 EDR Hist CleanerHYTONE CLEANERS 1018788324
TC6684447.2s Page 51
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
YesUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
YesUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
OtherOperator Type:
HOI KIM LIOperator Name:
OtherOwner Type:
HOI KIM LIOwner Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip:
4551 MUSCATEL AVEMailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
Not reportedLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
PERLAC@CONSTRUCTION911.COMContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
626-716-8669Contact Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Contact City,State,Zip:
4551 MUSCATEL AVEContact Address:
HOI KIM LIContact Name:
CAC002986733EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip:
4551 MUSCATEL AVEHandler Address:
HOI KIM LIHandler Name:
2018-10-26 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
547 ft.
0.104 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
355 ft.
< 1/8 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
East 4551 MUSCATEL AVE CAC002986733
3 RCRA NonGen / NLRHOI KIM LI 1024766861
TC6684447.2s Page 52
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
626-716-8669Owner/Operator Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
4551 MUSCATEL AVEOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
HOI KIM LIOwner/Operator Name:
OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
626-716-8669Owner/Operator Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
4551 MUSCATEL AVEOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
HOI KIM LIOwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
NoManifest Broker:
NoRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
2018-11-20 16:30:23.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
HOI KIM LI (Continued)1024766861
TC6684447.2s Page 53
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICESNAICS Description:
56299NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
HOI KIM LIHandler Name:
2018-10-26 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
HOI KIM LI (Continued)1024766861
Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
Not reportedLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
Not reportedContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
Not reportedContact Telephone:
Not reportedContact City,State,Zip:
Not reportedContact Address:
Not reportedContact Name:
CAD982491920EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip:
8626 E GRAND AVEHandler Address:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCHandler Name:
1996-09-01 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA-SQG:
HWTS
CERS
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS
HAZNET
ECHO
794 ft.FINDSSite 1 of 6 in cluster A
0.150 mi.SWEEPS UST
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
375 ft.
1/8-1/4 CERS HAZ WASTEROSEMEAD, CA 91770
North UST8626 E GRAND AVE CAD982491920
A4 RCRA-SQGSAKAIDA NURSERY INC 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 54
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
2002-06-27 03:34:30.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NNHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
NoUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
PrivateOperator Type:
NOT REQUIREDOperator Name:
Not reportedOwner Type:
Not reportedOwner Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip:
8626 E GRAND AVEMailing Address:
3State District:
CAState District Owner:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 55
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
CAState District Owner:
Large Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCHandler Name:
1990-06-21 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
CAState District Owner:
Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCHandler Name:
1996-09-01 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone:
NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
NOT REQUIREDOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
PrivateLegal Status:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCOwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone:
NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
NOT REQUIREDOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
PrivateLegal Status:
NOT REQUIREDOwner/Operator Name:
OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
Not reportedManifest Broker:
Not reportedRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 56
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
SAKAIDA NURSERYName:
2Number Of Tanks:
Not reportedContent:
WSTG:
UNKNOWNTank Use:
06-30-89Active Date:
Not reportedCapacity:
ATank Status:
19-000-014099-000001SWRCB Tank Id:
Not reportedOwner Tank Id:
06-30-89Created Date:
Not reportedAction Date:
06-30-89Referral Date:
44-010353Board Of Equalization:
9Number:
14099Comp Number:
ActiveStatus:
ROSEMEADCity:
8626 E GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERYName:
SWEEPS UST:
Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description:
10268479CERS ID:
401219Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8626 GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName:
CERS HAZ WASTE:
-118.079859Longitude:
34.092858Latitude:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYPermitting Agency:
14099Facility ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8626 GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERYName:
UST:
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
NURSERY AND FLORICULTURE PRODUCTIONNAICS Description:
11142NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
NoCurrent Record:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 57
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
8626 E GRAND AVENUEMailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
6262859981Telephone:
HENRY SAKAIDA, PRES.Contact:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
8626 E GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName:
HAZNET:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8626 E GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName:
http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002829949DFR URL:
110002829949Registry ID:
1000146642Envid:
ECHO:
additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report.
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
STATE MASTER
corrective action activities required under RCRA.
program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and
and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA
events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource
facilities.
generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal
provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for
California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART)
Environmental Interest/Information System:
Click Here:
110002829949Registry ID:
FINDS:
Not reportedNumber Of Tanks:
Not reportedContent:
WSTG:
UNKNOWNTank Use:
06-30-89Active Date:
Not reportedCapacity:
ATank Status:
19-000-014099-000002SWRCB Tank Id:
Not reportedOwner Tank Id:
06-30-89Created Date:
Not reportedAction Date:
06-30-89Referral Date:
44-010353Board Of Equalization:
9Number:
14099Comp Number:
ActiveStatus:
ROSEMEADCity:
8626 E GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 58
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
50Waste Quantity:
0.21Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
CAD099452708TSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD099452708TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD981373665Trans EPA ID:
99280354Manifest ID:
19990409Receipt Date:
5/17/1999 0:00:00Creation Date:
19990408Shipment Date:
CAD982491920Gen EPA ID:
1999Year:
Additional Info:
0.63Tons:
R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method:
135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionCA Waste Code:
CAD050099696TSD EPA ID:
CAD982491920Gepaid:
1996Year:
0.21Tons:
R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method:
135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionCA Waste Code:
CAD099452708TSD EPA ID:
CAD982491920Gepaid:
1999Year:
0.21Tons:
R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method:
135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionCA Waste Code:
CAD099452708TSD EPA ID:
CAD982491920Gepaid:
2000Year:
1.14Tons:
R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method:
221 - Waste oil and mixed oilCA Waste Code:
CAT080013352TSD EPA ID:
CAD982491920Gepaid:
2002Year:
0.1815Tons:
R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method:
331 - Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsCA Waste Code:
CAT080013352TSD EPA ID:
CAD982491920Gepaid:
2002Year:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 59
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
50Waste Quantity:
0.21Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
CAD050099696TSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD050099696TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD981373665Trans EPA ID:
96390634Manifest ID:
19961122Receipt Date:
12/4/1997 0:00:00Creation Date:
19961121Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
50Waste Quantity:
0.21Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
CAD050099696TSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD050099696TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD981373665Trans EPA ID:
96390684Manifest ID:
19961218Receipt Date:
12/4/1997 0:00:00Creation Date:
19961217Shipment Date:
CAD982491920Gen EPA ID:
1996Year:
Additional Info:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 60
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
2002Year:
Additional Info:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
50Waste Quantity:
0.21Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
CAD099452708TSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD099452708TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD981373665Trans EPA ID:
20124418Manifest ID:
20000612Receipt Date:
8/1/2000 0:00:00Creation Date:
20000609Shipment Date:
CAD982491920Gen EPA ID:
2000Year:
Additional Info:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
50Waste Quantity:
0.21Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
135 - Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD050099696TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD981373665Trans EPA ID:
95790925Manifest ID:
19960826Receipt Date:
12/4/1997 0:00:00Creation Date:
19960820Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 61
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
013685-014099Facility Id:
TPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8626 GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERYName:
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
300Waste Quantity:
1.14Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
221 - Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAT080013352TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAT080016116Trans EPA ID:
22247205Manifest ID:
20021017Receipt Date:
2/21/2003 10:42:43Creation Date:
20021010Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
55Waste Quantity:
0.1815Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
D001RCRA Code:
331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplus organicsWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAT080013352TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CA0000970392Trans EPA ID:
22012965Manifest ID:
20021231Receipt Date:
4/10/2003 10:20:47Creation Date:
20021223Shipment Date:
CAD982491920Gen EPA ID:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 62
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
1, Section(s) 265.173
40 CFR 1 265.173 - U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, ChapterCitation:
04-10-2019Violation Date:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCSite Name:
401219Site ID:
CERSViolation Source:
HWViolation Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division:
plastic used oil drum on site.
labeled. Observed operator provided a hazardous waste label to the
demonstrating that the container listed above has been properly
hazardous waste label. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Submit a photo to the CUPA
used motor oil located in the maintenance shop was observed without a
Returned to compliance on 04/10/2019. OBSERVATION: 1 x 55 gallons ofViolation Notes:
date.
characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation
name and address of the generator, physical and chemical
portable tanks with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste",
Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containers andViolation Description:
Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f)
22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation:
04-10-2019Violation Date:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCSite Name:
401219Site ID:
CERSViolation Source:
HWViolation Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division:
current manifest copy for used oil.
documenting disposal of used oil for minimum of 3 years. Provide
CORRECTIVE ACTION: The Owner/Operator shall maintain copies
years. Observed the last used oil manifest copy was on 02/18/2010.
failed to retain paperwork documenting disposal of used oil for 3
Returned to compliance on 09/03/2015. OBSERVATION: The Owner/OperatorViolation Notes:
manifest, or bills of lading copies for three years.
Failure to maintain uniform hazardous waste manifest, consolidatedViolation Description:
Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.40(a)
22 CCR 12 66262.40(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation:
12-16-2014Violation Date:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCSite Name:
401219Site ID:
Violations:
Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description:
10268479CERS ID:
401219Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8626 GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName:
CERS:
RemovedPermit Status:
00005548TPermit Number:
3PArea:
RemovedFacility Status:
0Facility Type:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 63
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
05-22-2018Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division:
significant violations observed.
Inspected by Inspector Miguel Gonzalez, Agricultural Inspector III. NoEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
04-12-2017Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HWEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Tony Magallanes, SalesEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
YesViolations Found:
04-10-2019Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division:
Violations Observed
Inspected by Miguel Gonzalez,AgInspIII; Consent by Mike Gutierrez; NoEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
04-08-2015Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division:
observed on the date of inspection.
Inspected by Inspector Miguel Gonzalez. No significant violationsEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
04-03-2019Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
Evaluation:
CERSViolation Source:
HWViolation Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division:
closed the used motor oil drum at time of inspection.
container listed above has been properly closed. Observed operator
CORRECTIVE ACTION: Submit photos to the CUPA demonstrating that the
used motor oil located in the maintenance shop was observed open.
Returned to compliance on 04/10/2019. OBSERVATION: 1 x 55 gallons ofViolation Notes:
leak.
stored in a manner which may rupture the container or cause it to
container holding hazardous waste must not be opened, handled, or
storage, except when it is necessary to add or remove waste. (b) A
container holding hazardous waste must always be closed during
Failure to meet the following container management requirements: (a) AViolation Description:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 64
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCFacility Name:
401219Site ID:
Coordinates:
CERSEval Source:
HWEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Mike Gutierrez (CEO)Eval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
YesViolations Found:
12-16-2014Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division:
No violations per Inspector Gonzalez.Eval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
09-19-2013Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HWEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Not reportedEval Notes:
Other, not routine, done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
09-03-2015Eval Date:
Other/UnknownEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division:
No significant violations observed by Inspector Miguel Gonzalez.Eval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
05-25-2016Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division:
observed on the date of inspection.
Inspected by Inspector Miguel A. Gonzalez. No significant violationsEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
05-22-2020Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Ag Comm/Weights and MeasuresEval Division:
1, 2018. No significant violations observed on the date of inspection.
Sakaida Nursery was inspected by Inspector Miguel A. Gonzalez on MayEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 65
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
(626) 807-9412Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
MIKE GUTIERREZEntity Name:
OperatorAffiliation Type Desc:
(626) 285-9981Affiliation Phone:
91770Affiliation Zip:
United StatesAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
RosemeadAffiliation City:
8626 Grand Ave.Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
MIKE GUTIERREZEntity Name:
Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Debbie GutierrezEntity Name:
Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc:
(323) 890-4000Affiliation Phone:
90040-3027Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
CommerceAffiliation City:
5825 Rickenbacker RoadAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Los Angeles County FireEntity Name:
CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
91770Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
RosemeadAffiliation City:
8626 Grand Ave.Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Mailing AddressEntity Name:
Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
-118.081210Longitude:
34.091510Latitude:
Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc:
Not reportedCoord Name:
10268479Program ID:
HMBPEnv Int Type Code:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 66
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
111998NAICS Code:
2003-10-23 15:27:19.000Create Date:
CAD982491920EPA ID:
NAICS:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701298City,State,Zip:
Not reportedContact Address 2:
8626 E GRAND AVENUEContact Address:
HENRY SAKAIDA, PRES.Contact Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000Owner City,State,Zip:
Not reportedOwner Address 2:
8626 E GRAND AVENUEOwner Address:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC.Owner Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000Mailing City,State,Zip:
Not reportedMailing Address 2:
8626 E GRAND AVENUEMailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
04/23/2009Last Act Date:
06/21/1990Create Date:
06/30/2008Inactive Date:
CAD982491920EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
8626 E GRAND AVEAddress:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCName:
HWTS:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Office ManagerEntity Title:
Debbie GutierrezEntity Name:
Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
91770Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
ROSEMEADAffiliation City:
8626 GRAND AVEAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
MIKE GUTIERREZEntity Name:
Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCEntity Name:
Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
TC6684447.2s Page 67
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
917700000Facility Zip:
CAFacility State:
Not reportedFacility County:
ROSEMEADFacility City:
Not reportedFacility Address 2:
8626 E GRAND AVEFacility Address:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCFacility Name:
2008-06-30 00:00:00Inactive Date:
1990-06-21 00:00:00Issued EPA ID Date:
Miscellaneous Nondurable Goods WholesalersNAICS Description:
4229NAICS Code:
2002-03-14 16:36:27.000Create Date:
CAD982491920EPA ID:
917700000Facility Zip:
CAFacility State:
Not reportedFacility County:
ROSEMEADFacility City:
Not reportedFacility Address 2:
8626 E GRAND AVEFacility Address:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INCFacility Name:
2008-06-30 00:00:00Inactive Date:
1990-06-21 00:00:00Issued EPA ID Date:
All Other Miscellaneous Crop FarmingNAICS Description:
SAKAIDA NURSERY INC (Continued) 1000146642
Not reportedMail To:
8182864200Facility Phone:
Not reportedSIC Code:
Not reportedCortese Code:
CAD980891Regulated ID:
UTNKARegulated By:
19019407Facility ID:
InactiveStatus:
Not reportedComments:
Not reportedEPA ID:
Not reportedNPDES Number:
Not reportedDUNs Number:
Not reportedContact Phone:
Not reportedContact:
WEST HOLLYWOOD 90069Mailing City,St,Zip:
Not reportedMailing Address 2:
2600 CAMINO RAMONMailing Address:
Not reportedMail To:
2136610191Facility Phone:
Not reportedSIC Code:
Not reportedCortese Code:
CAD980891Regulated ID:
UTNKIRegulated By:
19019407Facility ID:
CA FID UST:
862 ft. Site 2 of 6 in cluster A
0.163 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
378 ft.
1/8-1/4 WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069
North 8633 GRAND AVE N/A
A5 CA FID USTPACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625 S106027505
TC6684447.2s Page 68
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
ActiveStatus:
Not reportedComments:
Not reportedEPA ID:
Not reportedNPDES Number:
Not reportedDUNs Number:
Not reportedContact Phone:
Not reportedContact:
ROSEMEAD 91770Mailing City,St,Zip:
Not reportedMailing Address 2:
2600 CAMINO RAMONMailing Address:
PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625 (Continued) S106027505
NoFederal Universal Waste:
YesUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
YesUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
OtherOperator Type:
PAMELA BROOKSOperator Name:
OtherOwner Type:
PAMELA BROOKSOwner Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip:
4809 MUSCATEL AVEMailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
Not reportedLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
CLAIMS@ANMCONSTRUCTIONINC.COMContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
626-533-9963Contact Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Contact City,State,Zip:
4809 MUSCATEL AVEContact Address:
PAMELA BROOKSContact Name:
CAC002971799EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip:
4809 MUSCATEL AVEHandler Address:
PAMELA BROOKSHandler Name:
2018-07-19 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
919 ft.
0.174 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
366 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NE 4809 MUSCATEL AVE CAC002971799
6 RCRA NonGen / NLRPAMELA BROOKS 1024752002
TC6684447.2s Page 69
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
626-533-9963Owner/Operator Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
4809 MUSCATEL AVEOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
PAMELA BROOKSOwner/Operator Name:
OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
NoManifest Broker:
NoRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
2018-08-31 17:12:30.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
PAMELA BROOKS (Continued)1024752002
TC6684447.2s Page 70
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICESNAICS Description:
56299NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
PAMELA BROOKSHandler Name:
2018-07-19 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
626-533-9963Owner/Operator Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
4809 MUSCATEL AVEOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
PAMELA BROOKSOwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
PAMELA BROOKS (Continued)1024752002
Not reportedContact Title:
MARIA.SAROUKHANIAN@SCE.COMContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
626-302-4535Contact Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Contact City,State,Zip:
P.O. BOX 800Contact Address:
MARIA SAROUKHANIANContact Name:
CAC002987586EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip:
8533 E. GRAND AVEHandler Address:
ROSEMEAD SUBSTATIONHandler Name:
2018-11-01 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
991 ft.
0.188 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
374 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NNW 8533 E. GRAND AVE CAC002987586
7 RCRA NonGen / NLRROSEMEAD SUBSTATION 1024767709
TC6684447.2s Page 71
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
YesUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
YesUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
OtherOperator Type:
MARIA SAROUKHANIANOperator Name:
OtherOwner Type:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONOwner Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip:
P.O. BOX 800Mailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
Not reportedLand Type:
09EPA Region:
ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION (Continued) 1024767709
TC6684447.2s Page 72
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
221121NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
ROSEMEAD SUBSTATIONHandler Name:
2018-11-01 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
626-302-4535Owner/Operator Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
P.O. BOX 800Owner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
MARIA SAROUKHANIANOwner/Operator Name:
OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
626-302-1212Owner/Operator Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
P.O. BOX 800Owner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONOwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
NoManifest Broker:
NoRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
2018-11-20 16:30:39.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION (Continued) 1024767709
TC6684447.2s Page 73
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
ELECTRIC BULK POWER TRANSMISSION AND CONTROLNAICS Description:
ROSEMEAD SUBSTATION (Continued) 1024767709
1953Year Installed:
1Container Num:
001Tank Num:
0001Total Tanks:
NATIONAL CITY, CA 92050Owner City,St,Zip:
2602 HOOVER AVENUEOwner Address:
CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPOwner Name:
8182865586Telephone:
J. BILLINGTONContact Name:
Not reportedOther Type:
OtherFacility Type:
00000004976Facility ID:
STATERegion:
Not reportedURL:
Not reportedFile Number:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEAddress:
ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS CENTERName:
HIST UST:
Not reportedNumber Of Tanks:
Not reportedContent:
Not reportedSTG:
Not reportedTank Use:
Not reportedActive Date:
Not reportedCapacity:
Not reportedTank Status:
Not reportedSWRCB Tank Id:
Not reportedOwner Tank Id:
06-30-89Created Date:
Not reportedAction Date:
06-30-89Referral Date:
Not reportedBoard Of Equalization:
9Number:
1008Comp Number:
ActiveStatus:
ROSEMEADCity:
8657 GRAND AVEAddress:
CALIF-AMERICAN WATER COName:
SWEEPS UST:
1032 ft. Site 1 of 6 in cluster B
0.195 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
376 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NNE HIST UST8657 GRAND AVE N/A
B8 SWEEPS USTROSEMEAD OPERATIONS CENTER U001570510
TC6684447.2s Page 74
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring WellLeak Detection:
Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness:
UNLEADEDType of Fuel:
PRODUCTTank Used for:
00001000Tank Capacity:
ROSEMEAD OPERATIONS CENTER (Continued) U001570510
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
NoUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
OtherOperator Type:
MICHAEL PHILLIPSOperator Name:
OtherOwner Type:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Mailing City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVENUEMailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not reportedActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
Not reportedLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
MIKE.PHILLIPS@AMWATER.COMContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
812-565-8080Contact Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Contact City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVENUEContact Address:
MICHAEL PHILLIPSContact Name:
CAC003081616EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVENUEHandler Address:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name:
2020-08-31 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
1032 ft. Site 2 of 6 in cluster B
0.195 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
376 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NNE 8657 GRAND AVENUE CAC003081616
B9 RCRA NonGen / NLRCALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 1026475842
TC6684447.2s Page 75
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
MICHAEL PHILLIPSOwner/Operator Name:
OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
812-565-8080Owner/Operator Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVENUEOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
NoManifest Broker:
NoRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
2020-09-04 15:31:25.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026475842
TC6684447.2s Page 76
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMSNAICS Description:
221310NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name:
2020-08-31 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
812-565-8080Owner/Operator Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVENUEOwner/Operator Address:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026475842
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
Not reportedLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
SHAUNA.SARRAS@AMWATER.COMContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
619-446-4768Contact Telephone:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Contact City,State,Zip:
655 W. BROADWAYContact Address:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERContact Name:
CAC003062327EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEHandler Address:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name:
2020-04-03 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
1032 ft. Site 3 of 6 in cluster B
0.195 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
376 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NNE 8657 GRAND AVE CAC003062327
B10 RCRA NonGen / NLRCALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 1026162341
TC6684447.2s Page 77
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
NoUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
OtherOperator Type:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROperator Name:
OtherOwner Type:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner Name:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Mailing City,State,Zip:
655 W. BROADWAYMailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not reportedActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026162341
TC6684447.2s Page 78
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMSNAICS Description:
221310NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name:
2020-04-03 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
619-446-4768Owner/Operator Telephone:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
655 W. BROADWAYOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner/Operator Name:
OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
619-446-4768Owner/Operator Telephone:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
655 W. BROADWAYOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
NoManifest Broker:
NoRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
2020-04-08 18:59:32.0Handler Date of Last Change:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026162341
TC6684447.2s Page 79
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1026162341
NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
NoUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
OtherOperator Type:
SHAUNA SARRASOperator Name:
OtherOwner Type:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner Name:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Mailing City,State,Zip:
655 W. BROADWAYMailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not reportedActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
Not reportedLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
SHAUNA.SARRAS@AMWATER.COMContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
619-446-4768Contact Telephone:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Contact City,State,Zip:
655 W. BROADWAYContact Address:
SHAUNA SARRASContact Name:
CAC003038381EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-1220Handler City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEHandler Address:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name:
2019-10-11 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
1032 ft. Site 4 of 6 in cluster B
0.195 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
376 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NNE 8657 GRAND AVE CAC003038381
B11 RCRA NonGen / NLRCALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 1025857897
TC6684447.2s Page 80
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
655 W. BROADWAYOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
SHAUNA SARRASOwner/Operator Name:
OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
619-446-4768Owner/Operator Telephone:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
655 W. BROADWAYOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
OtherLegal Status:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
NoManifest Broker:
NoRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
2019-10-11 18:29:06.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1025857897
TC6684447.2s Page 81
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMSNAICS Description:
221310NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERHandler Name:
2019-10-11 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
619-446-4768Owner/Operator Telephone:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) 1025857897
Not reportedAccessibility:
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
PrivateLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
Not reportedContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
626-286-7414Contact Telephone:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-1221Contact City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEContact Address:
DAWN WHITEContact Name:
CAP000101139EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-1221Handler City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEHandler Address:
ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WAHandler Name:
2001-07-25 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA-SQG:
1032 ft. Site 5 of 6 in cluster B
0.195 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
376 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NNE 8657 GRAND AVE CAP000101139
B12 RCRA-SQGROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WA 1025879610
TC6684447.2s Page 82
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
2002-10-22 12:10:49.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
NoUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
Not reportedOperator Type:
Not reportedOperator Name:
PrivateOwner Type:
CALIF AMERICAN WATER COOwner Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-1221Mailing City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEMailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator:
ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WA (Continued) 1025879610
TC6684447.2s Page 83
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
No NAICS Codes FoundNAICS Codes:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WAHandler Name:
2001-07-25 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
626-289-7924Owner/Operator Telephone:
SAN MARINO, CA 91108-2022Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
2020 HUNTINGTON DROwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
PrivateLegal Status:
CALIF AMERICAN WATER COOwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
MERCURYWaste Description:
D009Waste Code:
IGNITABLE WASTEWaste Description:
D001Waste Code:
Not DefinedWaste Description:
D000Waste Code:
Hazardous Waste Summary:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
NoManifest Broker:
NoRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
ROSEMEAD YARD CALIF AMERICA WA (Continued) 1025879610
TC6684447.2s Page 84
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
AZR000515924TSD EPA ID:
CAL000424712Gepaid:
2017Year:
0.2085Tons:
Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect
H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including AcidDisposal Method:
222 - Oil/water separation sludgeCA Waste Code:
CAT080013352TSD EPA ID:
CAL000424712Gepaid:
2017Year:
655 W BROADWAY STE 1410Mailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
6194464768Telephone:
SHAUNA RACICOTContact:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
8657 GRAND AVEAddress:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERName:
HAZNET:
Not reportedEPAID:
United StatesProperty Owner Country:
Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code:
CAProperty Owner Stat :
RosemeadProperty Owner City:
8657 Grand AveProperty Owner Mailing Address:
626-614-2505Property Owner Phone:
California American WaterProperty Owner Name:
United StatesOwner Country:
91770Owner Zip Code:
CAOwner State:
8657 Grand AveOwner Mail Address:
626-614-2505Owner Phone:
626-614-2533Operator Phone:
California American WaterOperator Name:
91770Mailing Address Zip Code:
CAMailing Address State:
RosemeadMailing Address City:
8657 Grand Ave.Mailing Address:
626-286-0188Fax:
626-523-8744Phone:
California American WaterBusiness Name:
LACoFA0012898Facility ID:
10282627CERSID:
Not reportedTotal Gallons:
California American WaterOwner:
Not reportedCertified Unified Program Agencies:
ROSEMEAD,91770City/Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEAddress:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COName:
AST:
1032 ft.HWTSSite 6 of 6 in cluster B
0.195 mi.CERS
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
376 ft.
1/8-1/4 LOS ANGELES CO. HMSROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NNE HAZNET8657 GRAND AVE N/A
B13 ASTCALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 85
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
343 - Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
YUMA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTrans Name:
AZR000515924TSDF EPA ID:
WORLDWIDE RECOVERY SYSTEMSTrans 2 Name:
CAR000175422Trans 2 EPA ID:
UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
015054138JJKManifest ID:
20170616Receipt Date:
8/2/2018 18:30:37Creation Date:
20170605Shipment Date:
CAL000424712Gen EPA ID:
2017Year:
Additional Info:
0.15Tons:
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposal Method:
352 - Other organic solidsCA Waste Code:
AZR000515924TSD EPA ID:
CAL000424712Gepaid:
2017Year:
0.03Tons:
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposal Method:
513 - Empty containers less than 30 gallonsCA Waste Code:
AZR000515924TSD EPA ID:
CAL000424712Gepaid:
2017Year:
0.0125Tons:
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposal Method:
512 - Other empty containers 30 gallons or moreCA Waste Code:
AZR000515924TSD EPA ID:
CAL000424712Gepaid:
2017Year:
0.0375Tons:
H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method:
551 - Laboratory waste chemicalsCA Waste Code:
CAD028409019TSD EPA ID:
CAL000424712Gepaid:
2017Year:
0.15Tons:
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposal Method:
343 - Unspecified organic liquid mixtureCA Waste Code:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 86
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
PQuantity Unit:
75Waste Quantity:
0.0375Quantity Tons:
H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteMeth Code:
D001RCRA Code:
551 - Laboratory waste chemicals 561 Detergent and soapWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
CROSBY & OVERTONTrans Name:
CAD028409019TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
015054141JJKManifest ID:
20170612Receipt Date:
5/20/2018 18:32:00Creation Date:
20170605Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
PQuantity Unit:
300Waste Quantity:
0.15Quantity Tons:
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
352 - Other organic solidsWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
YUMA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTrans Name:
AZR000515924TSDF EPA ID:
WORLDWIDE RECOVERY SYSTEMSTrans 2 Name:
CAR000175422Trans 2 EPA ID:
UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
015054138JJKManifest ID:
20170616Receipt Date:
8/2/2018 18:30:37Creation Date:
20170605Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
PQuantity Unit:
300Waste Quantity:
0.15Quantity Tons:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 87
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAR000175422Trans 2 EPA ID:
UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
015054138JJKManifest ID:
20170616Receipt Date:
8/2/2018 18:30:37Creation Date:
20170605Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
50Waste Quantity:
0.2085Quantity Tons:
Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect
H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including AcidMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
222 - Oil/water separation sludgeWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
DEMENNO KERDOONTrans Name:
CAT080013352TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
015054139JJKManifest ID:
20170608Receipt Date:
5/17/2018 18:31:33Creation Date:
20170605Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
PQuantity Unit:
25Waste Quantity:
0.0125Quantity Tons:
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
512 - Other empty containers 30 gallons or moreWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
YUMA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTrans Name:
AZR000515924TSDF EPA ID:
WORLDWIDE RECOVERY SYSTEMSTrans 2 Name:
CAR000175422Trans 2 EPA ID:
UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INCTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
015054138JJKManifest ID:
20170616Receipt Date:
8/2/2018 18:30:37Creation Date:
20170605Shipment Date:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 88
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Section(s) Multiple
HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation:
01-30-2014Violation Date:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COSite Name:
101750Site ID:
Violations:
Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description:
10282627CERS ID:
101750Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEAddress:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COName:
CERS:
Not reportedPermit Status:
Not reportedPermit Number:
3PArea:
RemovedFacility Status:
Not reportedFacility Type:
000961-001008Facility Id:
Not reportedPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEAddress:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COName:
ClosedPermit Status:
000002489Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
000961-I01008Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8657 GRAND AVEAddress:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COName:
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
PQuantity Unit:
60Waste Quantity:
0.03Quantity Tons:
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
513 - Empty containers less than 30 gallonsWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
YUMA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTrans Name:
AZR000515924TSDF EPA ID:
WORLDWIDE RECOVERY SYSTEMSTrans 2 Name:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 89
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Consent by Staff Inspected by Eric Bald, LA Co FDEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
YesViolations Found:
01-30-2014Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
APSAEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Consent by Staff Inspected by Eric Bald, LA Co FDEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
YesViolations Found:
01-30-2014Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Not reportedEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
01-30-2014Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
APSAEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Not reportedEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
01-30-2014Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
Evaluation:
CERSViolation Source:
APSAViolation Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division:
lacking template
Returned to compliance on 02/28/2014. Tier I qualified facilityViolation Notes:
Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan .
Failure to prepare and implement a Spill Prevention Control andViolation Description:
6.67, Section(s) 25270.4.5(a)
HSC 6.67 25270.4.5(a) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation:
01-30-2014Violation Date:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COSite Name:
101750Site ID:
CERSViolation Source:
HMRRPViolation Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentViolation Division:
Returned to compliance on 02/28/2014. HMBP not in CERSViolation Notes:
Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - GeneralViolation Description:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 90
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
90040-3027Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
CommerceAffiliation City:
5825 Rickenbacker RoadAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Los Angeles County FireEntity Name:
CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
-118.079660Longitude:
34.092210Latitude:
Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc:
Not reportedCoord Name:
10282627Program ID:
HMBPEnv Int Type Code:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COFacility Name:
101750Site ID:
Coordinates:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
violation on site at time of inspection.
Jessica Taylor, Operations Supervisor Observed no significantEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
09-26-2017Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
APSAEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
violation on site at time of inspection.
Jessica Taylor, Operations Supervisor Observed no significantEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
09-26-2017Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Not reportedEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
07-01-2020Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
APSAEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Not reportedEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
07-01-2020Eval Date:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 91
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Shauna SarrasEntity Name:
Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc:
(626) 614-2533Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
California American WaterEntity Name:
OperatorAffiliation Type Desc:
(626) 614-2505Affiliation Phone:
91770Affiliation Zip:
United StatesAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
RosemeadAffiliation City:
8657 Grand AveAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
California American WaterEntity Name:
Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Manager, Water Quality & Environmental ComplianceEntity Title:
Shauna SarrasEntity Name:
Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
91770Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
RosemeadAffiliation City:
8657 Grand Ave.Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Mailing AddressEntity Name:
Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc:
(626) 614-2505Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
United StatesAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
RosemeadAffiliation City:
8657 Grand AveAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
California American WaterEntity Name:
Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc:
(323) 890-4000Affiliation Phone:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 92
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
8657 GRAND AVEFacility Address:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERFacility Name:
2017-06-30 00:00:00Inactive Date:
2017-02-07 11:17:24.46300Issued EPA ID Date:
Water Supply and Irrigation SystemsNAICS Description:
22131NAICS Code:
2017-02-07 11:17:24.547Create Date:
CAL000424712EPA ID:
NAICS:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101City,State,Zip:
SUITE 1410Contact Address 2:
655 W. BROADWAYContact Address:
SHAUNA RACICOTContact Name:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Owner City,State,Zip:
Not reportedOwner Address 2:
655 W BROADWAY STE 1410Owner Address:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATEROwner Name:
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Mailing City,State,Zip:
Not reportedMailing Address 2:
655 W BROADWAY STE 1410Mailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
10/23/2018Last Act Date:
02/07/2017Create Date:
06/30/2017Inactive Date:
CAL000424712EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
8657 GRAND AVEAddress:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATERName:
HWTS:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
California American WaterEntity Name:
Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
91770Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
RosemeadAffiliation City:
8657 Grand AveAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Mike PhillipsEntity Name:
Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
TC6684447.2s Page 93
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
91770Facility Zip:
CAFacility State:
Not reportedFacility County:
ROSEMEADFacility City:
Not reportedFacility Address 2:
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER (Continued) U002277992
RemovedPermit Status:
00004711TPermit Number:
3PArea:
RemovedFacility Status:
0Facility Type:
000958-001005Facility Id:
TPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701220City,State,Zip:
8633 GRAND AVEAddress:
PACIFIC BELL ROSMCA83/E1625Name:
PermitPermit Status:
000004023Permit Number:
3PArea:
PermitFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
000958-I01005Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701220City,State,Zip:
8633 GRAND AVEAddress:
AT&T CALIFORNIAName:
PermitPermit Status:
000005205Permit Number:
3PArea:
PermitFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
000958-I01005Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701220City,State,Zip:
8633 GRAND AVEAddress:
AT&T CALIFORNIAName:
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS:
Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description:
10265749CERS ID:
385545Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8633 E GRAND AVEAddress:
AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625Name:
CERS HAZ WASTE:
1069 ft. Site 3 of 6 in cluster A
0.202 mi.CERS
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.
1/8-1/4 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770
North LOS ANGELES CO. HMS8633 E GRAND AVE N/A
A14 CERS HAZ WASTEAT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625 S100941462
TC6684447.2s Page 94
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAAffiliation State:
CommerceAffiliation City:
5825 Rickenbacker RoadAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Los Angeles County FireEntity Name:
CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T CaliforniaEntity Name:
Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
CERSEval Source:
HWEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
significant violation on site at time of inspection.
Robert Fields (Environmental Compliance Manager) Observed noEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
03-24-2017Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
significant violation on site at time of inspection.
Robert Fields (Environmental Compliance Manager) Observed noEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
03-24-2017Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
Evaluation:
Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description:
10265749CERS ID:
385545Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8633 E GRAND AVEAddress:
AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625Name:
CERS:
Not reportedFacility Suite:
CCHARMLEStaff:
BacklogFile Status:
115.0449File Number:
4Region:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8633 E Grand AveAddress:
PACIFIC BELLName:
WIP:
AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625 (Continued) S100941462
TC6684447.2s Page 95
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedEntity Title:
Peter Burnell, Sigma Consultants, Inc.Entity Name:
Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc:
(214) 464-1712Affiliation Phone:
75202Affiliation Zip:
United StatesAffiliation Country:
TXAffiliation State:
DallasAffiliation City:
308 S. Akard St., 17th FloorAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T CaliforniaEntity Name:
Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc:
(800) 566-9347Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
AT&T CaliforniaEntity Name:
OperatorAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
National EPCRA ManagerEntity Title:
Jeremy McGrueEntity Name:
Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
75202Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
TXAffiliation State:
DallasAffiliation City:
308 S. Akard St., 17th FloorAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Mailing AddressEntity Name:
Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
75202Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
TXAffiliation State:
DallasAffiliation City:
308 S. Akard St., 17th FloorAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
AT&T EH&S Hotline - Option #1Entity Name:
Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc:
(323) 890-4000Affiliation Phone:
90040-3027Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625 (Continued) S100941462
TC6684447.2s Page 96
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
AT&T CALIFORNIA - E1625 (Continued) S100941462
-118.079597Longitude:
34.093761Latitude:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYPermitting Agency:
1005Facility ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8633 GRAND AVEAddress:
PACIFIC BELL ROSMCA83/E1625Name:
UST:
1069 ft. Site 4 of 6 in cluster A
0.202 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
North 8633 GRAND AVE N/A
A15 USTPACIFIC BELL ROSMCA83/E1625 U003775858
Not reportedOperator Name:
Not reportedOwner Type:
Not reportedOwner Name:
SAN RAMON, CA 94583Mailing City,State,Zip:
2600 CAMINO RAMONMailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Not reportedActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
1989Biennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Not reportedFederal Waste Generator Description:
Not reportedLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
Not reportedContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
213-738-8454Contact Telephone:
Not reportedContact City,State,Zip:
Not reportedContact Address:
CHERIE PACKERContact Name:
CAD980891725EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770Handler City,State,Zip:
8633 GRAND AVEHandler Address:
PACIFIC BELLHandler Name:
1990-04-09 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA-LQG:
1069 ft. Site 5 of 6 in cluster A
0.202 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
North 8633 GRAND AVE CAD980891725
A16 RCRA-LQGPACIFIC BELL 1007199136
TC6684447.2s Page 97
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
Not reportedManifest Broker:
Not reportedRecycler Activity Without Storage:
Not reportedExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
Not reportedImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
Not reportedRecognized Trader-Exporter:
Not reportedRecognized Trader-Importer:
2014-09-16 00:00:00.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
NoUniversal Waste Indicator:
Not reportedOff-Site Waste Receipt:
Not reportedUnderground Injection Control:
Not reportedSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
Not reportedSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
Not reportedRecycler Activity with Storage:
Not reportedTransfer Facility Activity:
Not reportedTransporter Activity:
Not reportedMixed Waste Generator:
Not reportedImporter Activity:
Not reportedShort-Term Generator Activity:
Not reportedOperator Type:
PACIFIC BELL (Continued)1007199136
TC6684447.2s Page 98
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
TELECOMMUNICATIONSNAICS Description:
5133NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Large Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
PACIFIC BELLHandler Name:
1990-04-09 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
PACIFIC BELL (Continued)1007199136
Not reportedStatus:
ROSEMEADCity:
8633 GRAND AVEAddress:
PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625Name:
1Number Of Tanks:
Not reportedContent:
WSTG:
UNKNOWNTank Use:
06-30-89Active Date:
Not reportedCapacity:
ATank Status:
19-000-001005-000001SWRCB Tank Id:
Not reportedOwner Tank Id:
06-30-89Created Date:
02-05-90Action Date:
02-05-90Referral Date:
44-007506Board Of Equalization:
1Number:
1005Comp Number:
ActiveStatus:
ROSEMEADCity:
8633 GRAND AVEAddress:
PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625Name:
SWEEPS UST:
1069 ft. Site 6 of 6 in cluster A
0.202 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.
1/8-1/4 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
North HIST UST8633 GRAND N/A
A17 SWEEPS USTPACIFIC BELL (E1-625)1000250075
TC6684447.2s Page 99
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
00012000Tank Capacity:
1979Year Installed:
G-79-12KContainer Num:
001Tank Num:
0003Total Tanks:
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107Owner City,St,Zip:
370 THIRD STOwner Address:
PACIFIC BELLOwner Name:
4155426758Telephone:
E. J. KOEHLERContact Name:
PHONE CO.Other Type:
OtherFacility Type:
00000016779Facility ID:
STATERegion:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00027A9F.pdfURL:
00027A9FFile Number:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8633 GRANDAddress:
PACIFIC BELL (E1-625)Name:
HIST UST:
Not reportedNumber Of Tanks:
Not reportedContent:
WASTESTG:
OILTank Use:
Not reportedActive Date:
250Capacity:
Not reportedTank Status:
19-000-001005-000003SWRCB Tank Id:
Not reportedOwner Tank Id:
Not reportedCreated Date:
Not reportedAction Date:
Not reportedReferral Date:
44-007506Board Of Equalization:
Not reportedNumber:
1005Comp Number:
Not reportedStatus:
ROSEMEADCity:
8633 GRAND AVEAddress:
PACIFIC BELL ROSMCAIA/E1625Name:
2Number Of Tanks:
Not reportedContent:
WASTESTG:
OILTank Use:
Not reportedActive Date:
550Capacity:
Not reportedTank Status:
19-000-001005-000002SWRCB Tank Id:
Not reportedOwner Tank Id:
Not reportedCreated Date:
Not reportedAction Date:
Not reportedReferral Date:
44-007506Board Of Equalization:
Not reportedNumber:
1005Comp Number:
PACIFIC BELL (E1-625) (Continued)1000250075
TC6684447.2s Page 100
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Click here for Geo Tracker PDF:
NoneLeak Detection:
Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness:
WASTE OILType of Fuel:
WASTETank Used for:
00000250Tank Capacity:
1965Year Installed:
W-65-250Container Num:
003Tank Num:
NoneLeak Detection:
Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness:
WASTE OILType of Fuel:
WASTETank Used for:
00000550Tank Capacity:
Not reportedYear Installed:
W-XX-550Container Num:
002Tank Num:
NoneLeak Detection:
Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness:
UNLEADEDType of Fuel:
PRODUCTTank Used for:
PACIFIC BELL (E1-625) (Continued)1000250075
Not reportedState District Owner:
Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator:
Not reportedAccessibility:
Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle:
Not reportedNon-Notifier:
Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
PrivateLand Type:
09EPA Region:
Not reportedContact Title:
Not reportedContact Email:
Not reportedContact Fax:
714-546-5601Contact Telephone:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776Contact City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVEContact Address:
MIKE BURNSContact Name:
CAD983623869EPA ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776Handler City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVEHandler Address:
E T C CARPET MILLSHandler Name:
1992-03-12 00:00:00.0Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA-SQG:
HWTS
CERS
WIP
HIST CORTESE
HAZNET
EMI
1567 ft.Cortese
0.297 mi.FINDS
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.
1/4-1/2 CPS-SLICSAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
NNW LUST5012 WALNUT GROVE CAD983623869
18 RCRA-SQGE T C CARPET MILLS 1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 101
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
2002-06-27 03:35:53.0Handler Date of Last Change:
Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe:
Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not reportedClosure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Progress Universe:
Not reportedPermit Workload Universe:
Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator:
NNHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
NoUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
Not reportedOperator Type:
Not reportedOperator Name:
PrivateOwner Type:
MIKE BURNSOwner Name:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776Mailing City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVEMailing Address:
Not reportedState District:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 102
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
34.1001939Latitude:
T0603702935Global Id:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603702935Geo Track:
LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVE NAddress:
E T.C. CARPET MILLSName:
LUST:
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
CARPET AND UPHOLSTERY CLEANING SERVICESNAICS Description:
56174NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
Not reportedElectronic Manifest Broker:
Not reportedNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Not reportedState District Owner:
Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
E T C CARPET MILLSHandler Name:
1992-03-12 00:00:00.0Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Email:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax:
Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext:
714-546-5601Owner/Operator Telephone:
SANTA ANA, CA 92704Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
3100 S SUSAN STOwner/Operator Address:
Not reportedDate Ended Current:
Not reportedDate Became Current:
PrivateLegal Status:
MIKE BURNSOwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
Not reportedManifest Broker:
Not reportedRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 103
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Los AngelesCounty:
04Regional Board:
4Region:
LUST REG 4:
06/17/1992Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
T0603702935Global Id:
09/06/1989Status Date:
Open - Case Begin DateStatus:
T0603702935Global Id:
LUST:
Leak ReportedAction:
02/26/1990Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603702935Global Id:
Leak DiscoveryAction:
09/06/1989Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603702935Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedPhone Number:
yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail:
Los AngelesCity:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name:
YUE RONGContact Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603702935Global Id:
6264583507Phone Number:
jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail:
ALHAMBRACity:
900 S FREMONT AVEAddress:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name:
JOHN AWUJOContact Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603702935Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedSite History:
DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern:
SoilPotential Media Affect:
Not reportedLocal Case Number:
Not reportedFile Location:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency:
I-03737RB Case Number:
JOACase Worker:
06/17/1992Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
-118.083728Longitude:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 104
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedSummary:
Not reportedAssigned Name:
Not reportedSuspended:
Not reportedCleanup Fund Id:
Not reportedPriority:
Not reportedBeneficial Use:
Not reportedLocal Agency Staff:
34.09416 / -1Lat/Long:
LUSTProgram:
5012 WALNUT GROVE, N., SAN GABRIEL, 91776RP Address:
E.T.C. CARPET MILLSResponsible Party:
Not reportedOwner Contact:
Not reportedOrganization:
Not reportedSoil Qualifier:
Not reportedGW Qualifier:
Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater:
Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date:
Not reportedEnforcement Action Date:
Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began:
Not reportedRemedial Action Underway:
Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted:
Not reportedPollution Characterization Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted:
UNKSource of Cleanup Funding:
1199.2411746169212363946557867Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft):
Not reportedWell Name:
Not reportedWater System:
MOXLEY, LENARDOperator:
UNKLeak Source:
UNKCause of Leak:
Not reportedHow Leak Stopped:
Tank ClosureHow Leak Discovered:
6/17/1992Date the Case was Closed:
6/17/1992Date Case Last Changed on Database:
Not reportedDate Leak Stopped:
Not reportedDate Confirmation Began:
3/5/1990Date Leak Record Entered:
2/26/1990Date Leak First Reported:
9/6/1989Date Leak Discovered:
Not reportedEnforcement Type:
Not reportedCross Street:
19000Local Agency:
UNKStaff:
Not reportedW Global ID:
T0603702935Global ID:
Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site:
SoilCase Type:
Not reportedLocal Case No:
Not reportedSubstance Quantity:
DieselSubstance:
Case ClosedStatus:
I-03737Facility Id:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 105
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedEnvirostor Id:
CORTESERegion:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVE NAddress:
E T.C. CARPET MILLSName:
CORTESE:
additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report.
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
corrective action activities required under RCRA.
program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and
and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA
events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource
Environmental Interest/Information System:
Click Here:
110070510259Registry ID:
STATE MASTER
HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT MAJOR
corrective action activities required under RCRA.
program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and
and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA
events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource
Environmental Interest/Information System:
Click Here:
110012439101Registry ID:
FINDS:
Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility:
Not reportedSite History:
Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern:
Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected:
Not reportedFile Location:
115.0178RB Case Number:
Not reportedLocal Agency:
CMCCase Worker:
Cleanup Program SiteCase Type:
-118.098937256835Longitude:
34.0930956420878Latitude:
Not reportedLead Agency Case Number:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency:
SL603799287Global Id:
09/21/2006Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status:
STATERegion:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 N. WALNUT GROVEAddress:
E T.C. CARPET MILLSName:
CPS-SLIC:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 106
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
5NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr:
1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr:
0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr:
4Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr:
Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule:
Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System:
SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name:
226SIC Code:
SCAir District Name:
60562Facility ID:
SCAir Basin:
19County Code:
1990Year:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVAddress:
ETC. CARPET MILLS, WALNUT DYE&Name:
0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:
0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr:
0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr:
0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr:
0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr:
0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr:
0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr:
Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule:
Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System:
SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name:
2273SIC Code:
SCAir District Name:
77052Facility ID:
SCAir Basin:
19County Code:
1990Year:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVEAddress:
ETC CARPET MILLS LTD, MIKE BERName:
EMI:
Active OpenFile Name:
Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name:
Not reportedSolid Waste Id No:
Not reportedWID Id:
Not reportedRegion 2:
Not reportedEffective Date:
Not reportedWaste Discharge System No:
Not reportedOrder No:
activeFlag:
Not reportedSwat R:
Not reportedEnf Type:
Not reportedOwner:
Not reportedLongitude:
Not reportedLatitude:
Not reportedSite Code:
Not reportedStatus Date:
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status:
LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type:
T0603702935Global ID:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 107
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAD028409019TSD EPA ID:
CAD983623869Gepaid:
1999Year:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVEMailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
8182863115Telephone:
LEONARD MOXLEYContact:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 917760000City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
5012 WALNUT GROVEAddress:
E T C CARPET MILLSName:
HAZNET:
1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:
2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr:
0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr:
3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr:
1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr:
4Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr:
5Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr:
Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule:
Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System:
SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name:
2270SIC Code:
SCAir District Name:
58162Facility ID:
SCAir Basin:
19County Code:
1995Year:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVAddress:
E.T.C. CARPET MILLS, LTD.Name:
1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:
2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr:
0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr:
3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr:
1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr:
4Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr:
5Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr:
Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule:
Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System:
SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name:
2270SIC Code:
SCAir District Name:
58162Facility ID:
SCAir Basin:
19County Code:
1993Year:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVAddress:
E.T.C. CARPET MILLS, LTD.Name:
0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:
0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr:
0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 108
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
2600Waste Quantity:
10.842Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
D007RCRA Code:
code 121 for a list of metals
132 - Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see wasteWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAT080033681TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
93100308Manifest ID:
19930611Receipt Date:
9/8/1995 0:00:00Creation Date:
19930611Shipment Date:
CAD983623869Gen EPA ID:
1993Year:
Additional Info:
10.842Tons:
R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method:
solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals))
132 - Aqueous solution with metals (< restricted levels and (AlkalineCA Waste Code:
CAT080033681TSD EPA ID:
CAD983623869Gepaid:
1993Year:
4.42Tons:
R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method:
343 - Unspecified organic liquid mixtureCA Waste Code:
CAT080033681TSD EPA ID:
CAD983623869Gepaid:
1995Year:
25.854Tons:
R01 - RecyclerDisposal Method:
solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals))
132 - Aqueous solution with metals (< restricted levels and (AlkalineCA Waste Code:
CAT080033681TSD EPA ID:
CAD983623869Gepaid:
1995Year:
0.8428Tons:
D80 - Disposal, Land FillDisposal Method:
151 - Asbestos containing wasteCA Waste Code:
CAD009007626TSD EPA ID:
CAD983623869Gepaid:
1999Year:
0.162Tons:
H01 - Transfer StationDisposal Method:
214 - Unspecified solvent mixtureCA Waste Code:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 109
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
5000Waste Quantity:
20.85Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
D007RCRA Code:
code 121 for a list of metals
132 - Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see wasteWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
CAT080033681TSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAT080033681TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
92845854Manifest ID:
19950313Receipt Date:
3/29/1996 0:00:00Creation Date:
19950313Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
1200Waste Quantity:
5.004Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
D007RCRA Code:
code 121 for a list of metals
132 - Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see wasteWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAT080033681TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
93301204Manifest ID:
19950313Receipt Date:
10/23/1995 0:00:00Creation Date:
19950313Shipment Date:
CAD983623869Gen EPA ID:
1995Year:
Additional Info:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 110
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
19990910Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
45Waste Quantity:
0.162Quantity Tons:
H01 - Transfer StationMeth Code:
D001RCRA Code:
214 - Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD028409019TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD982413262Trans EPA ID:
99472408Manifest ID:
19991116Receipt Date:
1/11/2000 0:00:00Creation Date:
19991006Shipment Date:
CAD983623869Gen EPA ID:
1999Year:
Additional Info:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
GQuantity Unit:
1300Waste Quantity:
4.42Quantity Tons:
R01 - RecyclerMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
343 - Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
CAT080033681TSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAT080033681TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD072953771Trans EPA ID:
93301475Manifest ID:
19950227Receipt Date:
3/29/1996 0:00:00Creation Date:
19950227Shipment Date:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 111
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
LOS ANGELESAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description:
SL603799287CERS ID:
205894Site ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 N. WALNUT GROVEAddress:
E T.C. CARPET MILLSName:
CERS:
Not reportedFacility Suite:
CCHARMLEStaff:
ActiveFile Status:
115.0178File Number:
4Region:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 N Walnut GroveAddress:
E T.C. CARPET MILLSName:
WIP:
I-03737Reg Id:
LTNKAReg By:
19Facility County Code:
CORTESERegion:
SAN GABRIEL, CACity,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVEedr_fadd1:
E T.C. CARPET MILLSedr_fname:
HIST CORTESE:
Not reportedAdditional Code 5:
Not reportedAdditional Code 4:
Not reportedAdditional Code 3:
Not reportedAdditional Code 2:
Not reportedAdditional Code 1:
YQuantity Unit:
1Waste Quantity:
0.8428Quantity Tons:
D80 - Disposal, Land FillMeth Code:
Not reportedRCRA Code:
151 - Asbestos-containing wasteWaste Code Description:
Not reportedTSDF Alt Name:
Not reportedTSDF Alt EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAD009007626TSDF EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans 2 Name:
Not reportedTrans 2 EPA ID:
Not reportedTrans Name:
CAR000017657Trans EPA ID:
99485815Manifest ID:
19990913Receipt Date:
11/16/1999 0:00:00Creation Date:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 112
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
SAN GABRIEL, CA 917762024City,State,Zip:
PER 97VQ NSContact Address 2:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVE_DEACTContact Address:
LEONARD MOXLEYContact Name:
SANTA ANA, CA 927040000Owner City,State,Zip:
Not reportedOwner Address 2:
3100 S SUSAN STOwner Address:
MIKE BERNSOwner Name:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 917762024Mailing City,State,Zip:
Not reportedMailing Address 2:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVEMailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
08/10/2004Last Act Date:
03/12/1992Create Date:
06/30/1997Inactive Date:
CAD983623869EPA ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 917760000City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
5012 WALNUT GROVEAddress:
E T C CARPET MILLSName:
HWTS:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
Los AngelesAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
6264583507Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
ALHAMBRAAffiliation City:
900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description:
T0603702935CERS ID:
224438Site ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
5012 WALNUT GROVE AVE NAddress:
E T.C. CARPET MILLSName:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
E T C CARPET MILLS (Continued)1000685755
TC6684447.2s Page 113
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Open - Case Begin DateStatus:
T0603705187Global Id:
09/03/1997Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
T0603705187Global Id:
LUST:
Leak ReportedAction:
09/03/1997Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603705187Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedPhone Number:
yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail:
Los AngelesCity:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name:
YUE RONGContact Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603705187Global Id:
6264583507Phone Number:
jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail:
ALHAMBRACity:
900 S FREMONT AVEAddress:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name:
JOHN AWUJOContact Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603705187Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedSite History:
Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern:
SoilPotential Media Affect:
Not reportedLocal Case Number:
Not reportedFile Location:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency:
R-13296RB Case Number:
JOACase Worker:
09/03/1997Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
-118.0865722Longitude:
34.09172Latitude:
T0603705187Global Id:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603705187Geo Track:
LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91731City,State,Zip:
8366 GRAND AVE EAddress:
SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DISTName:
LUST:
1672 ft.
0.317 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
372 ft.
1/4-1/2 CERSROSEMEAD, CA 91731
NW Cortese8366 GRAND AVE E N/A
19 LUSTSAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DIST S103282071
TC6684447.2s Page 114
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedBeneficial Use:
Not reportedLocal Agency Staff:
34.0916961 / -1Lat/Long:
LUSTProgram:
P.O. BOX 2227, SAN GABRIEL CA 91778-2227RP Address:
SAN GABRIEL COUNTY WATER DISTResponsible Party:
Not reportedOwner Contact:
Not reportedOrganization:
Not reportedSoil Qualifier:
Not reportedGW Qualifier:
Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater:
Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date:
Not reportedEnforcement Action Date:
Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began:
Not reportedRemedial Action Underway:
Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted:
Not reportedPollution Characterization Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted:
Not reportedSource of Cleanup Funding:
276.99392474831354133247289031Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft):
Not reportedWell Name:
Not reportedWater System:
Not reportedOperator:
Not reportedLeak Source:
Not reportedCause of Leak:
Not reportedHow Leak Stopped:
Not reportedHow Leak Discovered:
9/3/1997Date the Case was Closed:
9/3/1997Date Case Last Changed on Database:
Not reportedDate Leak Stopped:
Not reportedDate Confirmation Began:
3/19/1998Date Leak Record Entered:
9/3/1997Date Leak First Reported:
Not reportedDate Leak Discovered:
Not reportedEnforcement Type:
Not reportedCross Street:
19000Local Agency:
UNKStaff:
Not reportedW Global ID:
T0603705187Global ID:
Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site:
SoilCase Type:
Not reportedLocal Case No:
Not reportedSubstance Quantity:
HydrocarbonsSubstance:
Case ClosedStatus:
R-13296Facility Id:
Los AngelesCounty:
04Regional Board:
4Region:
LUST REG 4:
09/03/1997Status Date:
SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DIST (Continued) S103282071
TC6684447.2s Page 115
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CAAffiliation State:
Los AngelesAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
6264583507Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
ALHAMBRAAffiliation City:
900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description:
T0603705187CERS ID:
230393Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91731City,State,Zip:
8366 GRAND AVE EAddress:
SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DISTName:
CERS:
Active OpenFile Name:
Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name:
Not reportedSolid Waste Id No:
Not reportedWID Id:
Not reportedRegion 2:
Not reportedEffective Date:
Not reportedWaste Discharge System No:
Not reportedOrder No:
activeFlag:
Not reportedSwat R:
Not reportedEnf Type:
Not reportedOwner:
Not reportedLongitude:
Not reportedLatitude:
Not reportedSite Code:
Not reportedStatus Date:
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status:
LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type:
T0603705187Global ID:
Not reportedEnvirostor Id:
CORTESERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91731City,State,Zip:
8366 GRAND AVE EAddress:
SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DISTName:
CORTESE:
Not reportedSummary:
Not reportedAssigned Name:
Not reportedSuspended:
Not reportedCleanup Fund Id:
Not reportedPriority:
SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DIST (Continued) S103282071
TC6684447.2s Page 116
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
SAN GAVRIEL COUNTY WATER DIST (Continued) S103282071
000552423Permit Number:
3PArea:
PermitFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
006420-049571Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701112City,State,Zip:
4939 EARLE AVEAddress:
PHOENIX COMMISSARYName:
ClosedPermit Status:
000005393Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
006420-I06640Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701112City,State,Zip:
4939 EARLE AVEAddress:
LADCO LABORATORIES INCName:
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS:
Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility:
Not reportedSite History:
Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern:
Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected:
Not reportedFile Location:
115.0144RB Case Number:
Not reportedLocal Agency:
CMCCase Worker:
Cleanup Program SiteCase Type:
-118.084941Longitude:
34.091795Latitude:
Not reportedLead Agency Case Number:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency:
SL603799253Global Id:
09/21/2006Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status:
STATERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4939 N. EARLE AVE.Address:
GORDON PEST CONTROLName:
CPS-SLIC:
1895 ft.
0.359 mi.CERS
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
380 ft.
1/4-1/2 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NW LOS ANGELES CO. HMS4939 N EARLE AVE N/A
20 CPS-SLICGORDON PEST CONTROL U003062324
TC6684447.2s Page 117
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
LOS ANGELESAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description:
SL603799253CERS ID:
250871Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4939 N. EARLE AVE.Address:
GORDON PEST CONTROLName:
CERS:
Not reportedFacility Suite:
CCHARMLEStaff:
BacklogFile Status:
115.0144File Number:
4Region:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4939 N Earle AveAddress:
GORDON PEST CONTROLName:
WIP:
PermitPermit Status:
GORDON PEST CONTROL (Continued) U003062324
Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern:
Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected:
Not reportedFile Location:
115.0441RB Case Number:
Not reportedLocal Agency:
CMCCase Worker:
Cleanup Program SiteCase Type:
-118.072375Longitude:
34.087196Latitude:
Not reportedLead Agency Case Number:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency:
SL603799546Global Id:
09/21/2006Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status:
STATERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4619 N. ROSEMEAD BLVD.Address:
C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOSName:
CPS-SLIC:
2100 ft.
0.398 mi.CERS
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
349 ft.
1/4-1/2 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770
East LOS ANGELES CO. HMS4619 N ROSEMEAD BLVD N/A
21 CPS-SLICC P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOS S103317131
TC6684447.2s Page 118
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip:
4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName:
PermitPermit Status:
000016005Permit Number:
3PArea:
PermitFacility Status:
02Facility Type:
007358-025403Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip:
4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName:
ClosedPermit Status:
000009848Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
007358-I07711Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip:
4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName:
ClosedPermit Status:
000009847Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
007358-I07711Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip:
4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName:
ClosedPermit Status:
000009846Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
007358-I07711Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip:
4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName:
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS:
Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility:
Not reportedSite History:
C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOS (Continued) S103317131
TC6684447.2s Page 119
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
LOS ANGELESAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description:
SL603799546CERS ID:
211469Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4619 N. ROSEMEAD BLVD.Address:
C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOSName:
CERS:
Not reportedFacility Suite:
CCHARMLEStaff:
BacklogFile Status:
115.0441File Number:
4Region:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4619 N Rosemead BlvdAddress:
C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOSName:
WIP:
PermitPermit Status:
000016006Permit Number:
3PArea:
PermitFacility Status:
02Facility Type:
007358-025403Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701478City,State,Zip:
4619 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITALName:
PermitPermit Status:
000016007Permit Number:
3PArea:
PermitFacility Status:
02Facility Type:
007358-025403Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
C P C ALHAMBRA PSYCHIATRIC HOS (Continued) S103317131
TC6684447.2s Page 120
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip:
5001 EARLE AVEAddress:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
RemovedPermit Status:
000173187Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
008300-I08856Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip:
5001 EARLE AVEAddress:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
ClosedPermit Status:
000012076Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
008300-I08856Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip:
5001 EARLE AVEAddress:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS:
Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility:
Not reportedSite History:
Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern:
Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected:
Not reportedFile Location:
115.0159RB Case Number:
Not reportedLocal Agency:
GJHCase Worker:
Cleanup Program SiteCase Type:
-118.084941Longitude:
34.091795Latitude:
Not reportedLead Agency Case Number:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency:
SL603799268Global Id:
10/29/2014Status Date:
Open - InactiveFacility Status:
STATERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
5001 N. EARLE AVE.Address:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
CPS-SLIC:
2122 ft.HWTSSite 1 of 2 in cluster C
0.402 mi.CERS
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
384 ft.
1/4-1/2 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NW LOS ANGELES CO. HMS5001 EARLE AVE N/A
C22 CPS-SLICHUY FONG FOODS INC U003063980
TC6684447.2s Page 121
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
5001 EARLE AVEFacility Address:
HUY FONG FOODS INCFacility Name:
2008-06-30 00:00:00Inactive Date:
2005-09-09 14:04:16.61000Issued EPA ID Date:
Nonchocolate Confectionery ManufacturingNAICS Description:
31134NAICS Code:
2006-11-27 18:30:15.000Create Date:
CAL000298343EPA ID:
NAICS:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip:
Not reportedContact Address 2:
5001 EARLE AVEContact Address:
DONNA LAM - OFC ADMINISTRATORContact Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000Owner City,State,Zip:
Not reportedOwner Address 2:
5001 EARLE AVEOwner Address:
WILLIAM D. TRAN PRESIDENTOwner Name:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000Mailing City,State,Zip:
Not reportedMailing Address 2:
5001 EARLE AVEMailing Address:
Not reportedMailing Name:
04/23/2009Last Act Date:
09/09/2005Create Date:
06/30/2008Inactive Date:
CAL000298343EPA ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917700000City,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress 2:
5001 EARLE AVEAddress:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
HWTS:
Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description:
SL603799268CERS ID:
227300Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
5001 N. EARLE AVE.Address:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
CERS:
Not reportedFacility Suite:
CCHARMLEStaff:
BacklogFile Status:
115.0159File Number:
4Region:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
5001 N Earle AveAddress:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
WIP:
Not reportedPermit Status:
Not reportedPermit Number:
3PArea:
OPENFacility Status:
Not reportedFacility Type:
008300-042143Facility Id:
HUY FONG FOODS INC (Continued)U003063980
TC6684447.2s Page 122
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
917700000Facility Zip:
CAFacility State:
Not reportedFacility County:
ROSEMEADFacility City:
Not reportedFacility Address 2:
HUY FONG FOODS INC (Continued)U003063980
-118.08778516Longitude:
34.091885869Latitude:
7814.1684812Shape Area:
313.76068367Shape Length:
5Sup District:
Not reportedOperator Telephone:
Not reportedOperator Name:
Not reportedDescription:
Not reportedStatus:
174Site Number:
CACity,State,Zip:
Not reportedAddress:
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL DISPOSALName:
LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE:
2146 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster D
0.406 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
351 ft.
1/4-1/2 , CA
WNW N/A
D23 LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANECITY OF SAN GABRIEL DISPOSAL S127127916
T0603704697Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedSite History:
GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern:
SoilPotential Media Affect:
Not reportedLocal Case Number:
Not reportedFile Location:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency:
R-05784RB Case Number:
JOACase Worker:
08/13/1985Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
-118.073673Longitude:
34.08669Latitude:
T0603704697Global Id:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603704697Geo Track:
LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress:
TEXACOName:
LUST:
2195 ft.
0.416 mi.CERS
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
342 ft.
1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEROSEMEAD, CA 91770
ESE Cortese4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD N N/A
24 LUSTTEXACO S104164138
TC6684447.2s Page 123
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedLocal Case No:
Not reportedSubstance Quantity:
GasolineSubstance:
Leak being confirmedStatus:
R-05784Facility Id:
Los AngelesCounty:
04Regional Board:
4Region:
LUST REG 4:
08/13/1985Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
T0603704697Global Id:
07/22/1985Status Date:
Open - Site AssessmentStatus:
T0603704697Global Id:
07/22/1985Status Date:
Open - Case Begin DateStatus:
T0603704697Global Id:
LUST:
Leak ReportedAction:
07/22/1985Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603704697Global Id:
Leak StoppedAction:
07/22/1985Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603704697Global Id:
Leak DiscoveryAction:
07/22/1985Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603704697Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedPhone Number:
yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail:
Los AngelesCity:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name:
YUE RONGContact Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603704697Global Id:
6264583507Phone Number:
jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail:
ALHAMBRACity:
900 S FREMONT AVEAddress:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name:
JOHN AWUJOContact Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type:
TEXACO (Continued)S104164138
TC6684447.2s Page 124
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedEnvirostor Id:
CORTESERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress:
TEXACOName:
CORTESE:
OLD CASE #000207Summary:
Not reportedAssigned Name:
Not reportedSuspended:
Not reportedCleanup Fund Id:
Not reportedPriority:
Not reportedBeneficial Use:
Not reportedLocal Agency Staff:
34.0863483 / -1Lat/Long:
LUSTProgram:
4441 NORTH ROSEMEAD BLVD., ROSEMEAD, CARP Address:
TEXACO USAResponsible Party:
Not reportedOwner Contact:
Not reportedOrganization:
Not reportedSoil Qualifier:
Not reportedGW Qualifier:
Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater:
Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date:
Not reportedEnforcement Action Date:
Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began:
Not reportedRemedial Action Underway:
Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted:
Not reportedPollution Characterization Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted:
UNKSource of Cleanup Funding:
912.2405636084677731570442014Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft):
Not reportedWell Name:
Not reportedWater System:
WAGNER, W.W.Operator:
UNKLeak Source:
UNKCause of Leak:
Not reportedHow Leak Stopped:
Tank ClosureHow Leak Discovered:
Not reportedDate the Case was Closed:
8/24/1987Date Case Last Changed on Database:
7/22/1985Date Leak Stopped:
7/22/1985Date Confirmation Began:
12/31/1986Date Leak Record Entered:
7/22/1985Date Leak First Reported:
7/22/1985Date Leak Discovered:
Not reportedEnforcement Type:
Not reportedCross Street:
19000Local Agency:
UNKStaff:
Not reportedW Global ID:
T0603704697Global ID:
Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site:
SoilCase Type:
TEXACO (Continued)S104164138
TC6684447.2s Page 125
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
Los AngelesAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
6264583507Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
ALHAMBRAAffiliation City:
900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description:
T0603704697CERS ID:
187584Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4441 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress:
TEXACOName:
CERS:
R-05784Reg Id:
LTNKAReg By:
19Facility County Code:
CORTESERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4441 ROSEMEADedr_fadd1:
TEXACOedr_fname:
HIST CORTESE:
Active OpenFile Name:
Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name:
Not reportedSolid Waste Id No:
Not reportedWID Id:
Not reportedRegion 2:
Not reportedEffective Date:
Not reportedWaste Discharge System No:
Not reportedOrder No:
activeFlag:
Not reportedSwat R:
Not reportedEnf Type:
Not reportedOwner:
Not reportedLongitude:
Not reportedLatitude:
Not reportedSite Code:
Not reportedStatus Date:
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status:
LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type:
T0603704697Global ID:
TEXACO (Continued)S104164138
TC6684447.2s Page 126
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NoSite Is Archived:
NotificationSite Regulatory Status:
ActiveSite Operational Status:
Nai TeurnPoint of Contact:
Not reportedPermitted Depth Type:
Not reportedPermitted Depth:
Not reportedPermitted Elevation Type:
Not reportedPermitted Elevation:
Not reportedDisposal Acreage:
Not reportedTotal Acreage:
Cubic Yards per yearCapacity Units:
68000Capacity:
Not reportedRemaining Capacity Date:
Not reportedRemaining Capacity:
Cubic Yards per DayThroughput Units:
60Throughput:
QuarterlyInspection Frequency:
Not reportedCease Operation Type:
Not reportedCease Operation:
Not reportedWDR Landfill Class:
Not reportedWDR Number:
Solid Waste OperationActivity Classification:
Transfer/ProcessingCategory:
NoActivity Is Archived:
Limited Volume Transfer OperationActivity:
City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name:
19-AA-0004SWIS Number:
Activity:
NotificationRegulation Status:
Department of Public HealthEnforcing Agency Department:
County of Los AngelesEnforcing Agency Legal Name:
Department of Public HealthReporting Agency Department:
County of Los AngelesReporting Agency Legal Name:
San GabrielLocal Government:
Los AngelesSWRCB Region:
South CoastARB District:
Not reportedEPA Federal Registry ID:
Not reportedClosed Illegal Abandoned Category:
Not reportedAbsorbed By:
ActiveOperational Status:
Not reportedAbsorbed On:
NoIs Financial Assurances Responsible:
NoIs Site Inert Debris Engineered Fill:
NoIs Closed Illegal Abandoned:
NoIs Archived:
Nai TeurnPoint of Contact:
19-AA-0004SWIS Number:
19-AA-0004Facility ID:
STATERegion:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
917 EAST GRAND AVENUEAddress:
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKSName:
SWF/LF (SWIS):
2234 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster D
0.423 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
363 ft.
1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
WNW CERS917 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A
D25 SWF/LFCITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKS S119777587
TC6684447.2s Page 127
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedContact Name:
12/9/2016Started On:
NoIs Archived:
-118.09002Longitude:
34.09174Latitude:
NotificationSite Regulatory Status:
Non-Disposal OnlySite Type:
ActiveSite Operational Status:
City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name:
91776Owner Zip:
CAOwner State:
San GabrielOwner City:
Public Work Department P.O. Box 130Owner Address:
City of San GabrielOwner:
19-AA-0004SWIS Number:
Owner:
91776Operator Zip:
CAOperator State:
San GabrielOperator City:
Public Works Department 917 E. Grand AveStreet Address:
(626) 308-2825Contact Phone:
Not reportedContact Email:
Not reportedContact Title:
Not reportedContact Name:
12/9/2016Started On:
City of San GabrielOperator:
NoIs Archived:
-118.09002Longitude:
34.09174Latitude:
NotificationSite Regulatory Status:
Non-Disposal OnlySite Type:
ActiveSite Operational Status:
City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name:
19-AA-0004SWIS Number:
Operator:
Department of Public HealthEnforcing Agency Department:
County of Los AngelesEnforcing Agency Legal Name:
Department of Public HealthReporting Agency Department:
County of Los AngelesReporting Agency Legal Name:
91776ZIP Code:
CAState:
San GabrielCity:
917 East Grand AvenueStreet Address:
San GabrielLocal Government:
Los AngelesSWRCB Region:
South CoastARB District:
Los AngelesCounty:
Not reportedEPA Federal Registry ID:
Not reportedClosed Illegal Abandoned Category:
Not reportedAbsorbed By:
Not reportedAbsorbed On:
NoIs Financial Assurances Responsible:
NoIs Site Inert Debris Engineered Fill:
NoIs Closed Illegal Abandoned:
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) S119777587
TC6684447.2s Page 128
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
507818Site ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CACity,State,Zip:
917 EAST GRAND AVENUEAddress:
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKSName:
CERS:
Solid Waste OperationActivity Classification:
Transfer/ProcessingActivity Category:
NotificationActivity Regulatory Status:
ActiveActivity Operational Status:
NoActivity Is Archived:
Nai TeurnPoint of Contact:
Non-Disposal OnlySite Type:
NotificationSite Regulatory Status:
ActiveSite Operational Status:
NoSite Is Archived:
Mixed municipalWaste Type:
Limited Volume Transfer OperationActivity:
City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name:
19-AA-0004SWIS Number:
Solid Waste OperationActivity Classification:
Transfer/ProcessingActivity Category:
NotificationActivity Regulatory Status:
ActiveActivity Operational Status:
NoActivity Is Archived:
Nai TeurnPoint of Contact:
Non-Disposal OnlySite Type:
NotificationSite Regulatory Status:
ActiveSite Operational Status:
NoSite Is Archived:
Green MaterialsWaste Type:
Limited Volume Transfer OperationActivity:
City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name:
19-AA-0004SWIS Number:
Solid Waste FacilityActivity Classification:
DisposalActivity Category:
ExemptActivity Regulatory Status:
ClosedActivity Operational Status:
YesActivity Is Archived:
Nai TeurnPoint of Contact:
Non-Disposal OnlySite Type:
NotificationSite Regulatory Status:
ActiveSite Operational Status:
NoSite Is Archived:
Construction/demolitionWaste Type:
Inert Waste Disposal SiteActivity:
City Of San Gabriel Public WorksSite Name:
19-AA-0004SWIS Number:
Waste:
(626) 308-2825Contact Phone:
Not reportedContact Email:
Not reportedContact Title:
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) S119777587
TC6684447.2s Page 129
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
6263082825Affiliation Phone:
91776Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
San GabrielAffiliation City:
Public Work DepartmentP.O. Box 130Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
CITY OF SAN GABRIELEntity Name:
Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc:
6263082825Affiliation Phone:
91776Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
San GabrielAffiliation City:
Public Works Department917 E. Grand AveAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
CITY OF SAN GABRIELEntity Name:
Legal OperatorAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Solid Waste and Recycle SitesCERS Description:
19-AA-0004CERS ID:
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) S119777587
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip:
5045 EARLE AVEAddress:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS:
Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility:
Not reportedSite History:
Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern:
Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected:
Not reportedFile Location:
115.0445RB Case Number:
Not reportedLocal Agency:
CMCCase Worker:
Cleanup Program SiteCase Type:
-118.084941Longitude:
34.091795Latitude:
Not reportedLead Agency Case Number:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency:
SL603799550Global Id:
09/21/2006Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status:
STATERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
5045 N. EARLE AVE.Address:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
CPS-SLIC:
2300 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C
0.436 mi.CERS
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
385 ft.
1/4-1/2 WIPROSEMEAD, CA 91770
NW LOS ANGELES CO. HMS5045 N EARLE AVE N/A
C26 CPS-SLICHUY FONG FOODS INC S102229418
TC6684447.2s Page 130
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
LOS ANGELESAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description:
SL603799550CERS ID:
257476Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
5045 N. EARLE AVE.Address:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
CERS:
Not reportedFacility Suite:
CCHARMLEStaff:
BacklogFile Status:
115.0445File Number:
4Region:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
5045 N Earle AveAddress:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
WIP:
Not reportedPermit Status:
Not reportedPermit Number:
3PArea:
OPENFacility Status:
Not reportedFacility Type:
017363-042144Facility Id:
Not reportedPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917701169City,State,Zip:
5045 EARLE AVEAddress:
HUY FONG FOODS INCName:
ClosedPermit Status:
000014276Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
017363-023543Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
HUY FONG FOODS INC (Continued)S102229418
TC6684447.2s Page 131
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
significant human population, or render unusable a potential domestic
adverse impact on receiving biota, can cause aesthetic impairment to a
Moderate Threat to Water Quality. A violation could have a majorThreat to Water Quality:
CITY OF SAN GABRIELSolid Waste Assessment Test Program:
FalseDepartment of Defence:
FalseResource Conservation Recovery Act:
FalseToxic Pits Cleanup Act Program:
TrueSolid Waste Assessment Test Program:
TrueWaste Discharge System:
Not reportedLast Facility Editors:
Not reportedComments:
Not reportedSecondary SIC:
4953Primary SIC:
SAN GABRIEL DISPOSAL SITESWAT Facility Name:
8182824104Facility Telephone:
Not reportedFacility Description:
Industrial, Agricultural or Solid Waste (Class I, II or III)
Other - Does not fall into the category of Municipal/Domestic,Facility Type:
4Region:
2132824104Land Owner Phone:
Not reportedLand Owner Contact:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776Land Owner City,St,Zip:
P.O. BOX 130Land Owner Address:
CITY OF SAN GABRIELLand Owner Name:
8182824104Agency Telephone:
Not reportedAgency Contact:
SAN GABRIEL ,CA 91778Agency City,St,Zip:
P.O.BOX 130Agency Address:
Not reportedAgency Department:
86 SAN GABRIEL, CITY OFAgency Name:
CityAgency Type:
TrueWaste List:
FalseOpen To Public:
FalseSuperorder:
FalseMunicipal Solid Waste:
Not reportedRegional Board ID:
1Tonnage:
Not reportedNPID:
Not reportedBase Meridian:
Not reportedSecondary Waste Type:
Not reportedSecondary Waste:
rubble and concrete are examples of this category.
Such wastes could cause turbidity and siltation. Uncontaminated soils,
or organic wastes and have little adverse impact on water quality.
Inert/Influent or Solid Wastes that do not contain soluble pollutantsPrimary Waste Type:
SLDWSTPrimary Waste:
products, solid wastes, and sewage pump out facilities.
treatment systems that are complex, such as marinas with petroleum
disposal), or any Class II or III disposal site, or facilities without
waste treatment system (except for septic systems with subsurface
Category B - Any facility having a physical, chemical, or biologicalComplexity:
Not reportedEdit Date:
WMUDS/SWAT:
2301 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster D
0.436 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
365 ft.
1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL ,CA, CA 91778
WNW 911 GRAND N/A
D27 WMUDS/SWAT911 GRAND, SAN GABRIEL S104156393
TC6684447.2s Page 132
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
19-AA-0004Solid Waste Information ID:
4B190315001Waste Discharge System ID:
Quarterly SubmittalSelf-Monitoring Rept. Frequency:
HWaste Discharge Requirements:
NoRCRA Facility:
Not reportedSection Range:
1Number of WMUDS at Facility:
BPBRegional Board Project Officer:
TrueSub Chapter 15:
from a waste treatment facility.
or municipal water supply. Awsthetic impairment would include nuisance
911 GRAND, SAN GABRIEL (Continued) S104156393
N/ASite Mailing Address:
5District:
Not reportedOwner Email:
Not reportedOwner Telephone:
Not reportedOwner Contact:
Not reportedOwner City/State/Zip:
Not reportedOwner Address:
City of San GabrielOwner Name:
Not reportedOperator Email:
(818) 308-2806Operator Telephone:
Not reportedOperator Contact:
San Gabriel, CA 91776Operator City/State/Zip:
927 E. Grand AvenueOperator Address:
City of San GabrielOperator Name:
Detail As Of 01/2014:
Not reportedDisposal Area (Acre):
Monday - Thursday 6:30 am - 4 pm; Friday 6:30 am - 3 pmHours of Operation:
Green Materials;Household Trash;Waste Accepted:
ActiveStatus:
N/ARemaining Capacity(Million):
Transfer/Processing FacilityPresent Use:
735Permitted Capacity:
Not reportedMaximun Depth Fill(Ft):
County Of Los Angeles Department of Public HealthLocal Enforcement Agency:
N/AEnding Operation Date:
N/ABeginning Operation Date:
19-AA-0004Site SWIS Number:
Transfer and Processing FacilitySite Type:
N/ASite Website:
jlopez@sgch.orgSite Email:
(626) 308-2825Site Contact Phone:
Not reportedSite Contact:
N/AAlt. Address:
N/AAlt. Site Name:
174Site ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
927 E. GRAND AVENUEAddress:
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL DISPOSALName:
LOS ANGELES CO. LF:
2327 ft.
0.441 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
368 ft.
1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
NW 927 E. GRAND AVENUE N/A
28 SWF/LFCITY OF SAN GABRIEL DISPOSAL S111075845
TC6684447.2s Page 133
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
LOS ANGELESAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description:
SL603799257CERS ID:
234785Site ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
851 E. GRAND AVE.Address:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HUMANE SOCName:
CERS:
Not reportedFacility Suite:
CCHARMLEStaff:
BacklogFile Status:
115.0148File Number:
4Region:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
851 E Grand AveAddress:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HUMANE SOCName:
WIP:
Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility:
Not reportedSite History:
Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern:
Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affected:
Not reportedFile Location:
115.0148RB Case Number:
Not reportedLocal Agency:
CMCCase Worker:
Cleanup Program SiteCase Type:
-118.088669Longitude:
34.091781Latitude:
Not reportedLead Agency Case Number:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency:
SL603799257Global Id:
02/23/2016Status Date:
Open - InactiveFacility Status:
STATERegion:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
851 E. GRAND AVE.Address:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HUMANE SOCName:
CPS-SLIC:
2382 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster D
0.451 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
367 ft.
1/4-1/2 CERSSAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
WNW WIP851 E GRAND AVE N/A
D29 CPS-SLICSAN GABRIEL VALLEY HUMANE SOC S106485035
TC6684447.2s Page 134
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
6A189011N04Reg Id:
WBC&DReg By:
18Facility County Code:
CORTESERegion:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
1425 DELTAedr_fadd1:
ALVAREZ, CHARLES & JEANETedr_fname:
HIST CORTESE:
2505 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster E
0.474 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
328 ft.
1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
SW 1425 DELTA N/A
E30 HIST CORTESEALVAREZ, CHARLES & JEANET S105026225
6A189011N05Reg Id:
WBC&DReg By:
18Facility County Code:
CORTESERegion:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
1425 DELTAedr_fadd1:
ALVAREZ. CHARLES & JEANETedr_fname:
HIST CORTESE:
2505 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E
0.474 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
328 ft.
1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
SW 1425 DELTA N/A
E31 HIST CORTESEALVAREZ. CHARLES & JEANET S105026224
R-01935Reg Id:
LTNKAReg By:
19Facility County Code:
CORTESERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91771City,State,Zip:
4251 ROSEMEADedr_fadd1:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERedr_fname:
HIST CORTESE:
2566 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster F
0.486 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
335 ft.
1/4-1/2 ROSEMEAD, CA 91771
SE 4251 ROSEMEAD N/A
F32 HIST CORTESEROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER S104160265
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName:
LUST:
CERS
2566 ft.WIPSite 2 of 2 in cluster F
0.486 mi.LOS ANGELES CO. HMS
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
335 ft.
1/4-1/2 CorteseROSEMEAD, CA 91770
SE SWEEPS UST4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD N N/A
F33 LUSTROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER S105032651
TC6684447.2s Page 135
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
T0603704579Global Id:
11/01/1995Status Date:
Open - Case Begin DateStatus:
T0603704579Global Id:
LUST:
Leak ReportedAction:
11/01/1995Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603704579Global Id:
Leak StoppedAction:
11/01/1995Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603704579Global Id:
Leak DiscoveryAction:
11/01/1995Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603704579Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedPhone Number:
yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail:
Los AngelesCity:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name:
YUE RONGContact Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603704579Global Id:
6264583507Phone Number:
jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail:
ALHAMBRACity:
900 S FREMONT AVEAddress:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name:
JOHN AWUJOContact Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603704579Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedSite History:
Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern:
SoilPotential Media Affect:
Not reportedLocal Case Number:
Not reportedFile Location:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency:
R-01935RB Case Number:
JOACase Worker:
08/04/1997Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
-118.073674Longitude:
34.083992Latitude:
T0603704579Global Id:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603704579Geo Track:
LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651
TC6684447.2s Page 136
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
U-HAUL COMPANYResponsible Party:
Not reportedOwner Contact:
Not reportedOrganization:
Not reportedSoil Qualifier:
Not reportedGW Qualifier:
Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater:
Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date:
Not reportedEnforcement Action Date:
Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began:
Not reportedRemedial Action Underway:
Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted:
Not reportedPollution Characterization Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted:
PipingSource of Cleanup Funding:
176.08599318074945682714136005Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft):
Not reportedWell Name:
Not reportedWater System:
RODGERS, CLINTOperator:
PipingLeak Source:
UNKCause of Leak:
Not reportedHow Leak Stopped:
Tank ClosureHow Leak Discovered:
8/4/1997Date the Case was Closed:
8/4/1997Date Case Last Changed on Database:
11/1/1995Date Leak Stopped:
11/1/1995Date Confirmation Began:
4/29/1996Date Leak Record Entered:
11/1/1995Date Leak First Reported:
11/1/1995Date Leak Discovered:
Not reportedEnforcement Type:
MISSION DRIVECross Street:
19000Local Agency:
UNKStaff:
Not reportedW Global ID:
T0603704579Global ID:
Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site:
SoilCase Type:
Not reportedLocal Case No:
Not reportedSubstance Quantity:
HydrocarbonsSubstance:
Case ClosedStatus:
R-01935Facility Id:
Los AngelesCounty:
04Regional Board:
4Region:
LUST REG 4:
08/04/1997Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
T0603704579Global Id:
11/01/1995Status Date:
Open - Site AssessmentStatus:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651
TC6684447.2s Page 137
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName:
CORTESE:
Not reportedNumber Of Tanks:
Not reportedContent:
WSTG:
UNKNOWNTank Use:
06-30-89Active Date:
Not reportedCapacity:
ATank Status:
19-000-001935-000002SWRCB Tank Id:
Not reportedOwner Tank Id:
06-30-89Created Date:
Not reportedAction Date:
06-30-89Referral Date:
44-007600Board Of Equalization:
9Number:
1935Comp Number:
ActiveStatus:
ROSEMEADCity:
4251 N ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName:
2Number Of Tanks:
Not reportedContent:
WSTG:
UNKNOWNTank Use:
06-30-89Active Date:
Not reportedCapacity:
ATank Status:
19-000-001935-000001SWRCB Tank Id:
Not reportedOwner Tank Id:
06-30-89Created Date:
Not reportedAction Date:
06-30-89Referral Date:
44-007600Board Of Equalization:
9Number:
1935Comp Number:
ActiveStatus:
ROSEMEADCity:
4251 N ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName:
SWEEPS UST:
Not reportedSummary:
Not reportedAssigned Name:
Not reportedSuspended:
Not reportedCleanup Fund Id:
Not reportedPriority:
Not reportedBeneficial Use:
Not reportedLocal Agency Staff:
34.0838324 / -1Lat/Long:
LUSTProgram:
1985 E COVINA BLVD, COVINA CA 91724-1822RP Address:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651
TC6684447.2s Page 138
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedFacility Suite:
CCHARMLEStaff:
Not reportedFile Status:
115.0451File Number:
4Region:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4251 N Rosemead BlvdAddress:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName:
WIP:
RemovedPermit Status:
00005334TPermit Number:
3PArea:
RemovedFacility Status:
0Facility Type:
001860-001935Facility Id:
TPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917704427City,State,Zip:
4251 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName:
ClosedPermit Status:
000000602Permit Number:
3PArea:
ClosedFacility Status:
01Facility Type:
001860-I01935Facility Id:
IPermit Category:
LARegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 917704427City,State,Zip:
4251 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName:
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS:
Active OpenFile Name:
Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name:
Not reportedSolid Waste Id No:
Not reportedWID Id:
Not reportedRegion 2:
Not reportedEffective Date:
Not reportedWaste Discharge System No:
Not reportedOrder No:
activeFlag:
Not reportedSwat R:
Not reportedEnf Type:
Not reportedOwner:
Not reportedLongitude:
Not reportedLatitude:
Not reportedSite Code:
Not reportedStatus Date:
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status:
LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type:
T0603704579Global ID:
Not reportedEnvirostor Id:
CORTESERegion:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651
TC6684447.2s Page 139
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
06-22-2016Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Inspected by Arturo Mico, HMS II Consent by Edgardo GalamoniziEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
01-25-2013Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Not reportedEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
01-25-2013Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
Evaluation:
Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description:
10339474CERS ID:
404650Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4251 ROSEMEAD BLVDAddress:
U-HAUL OF ROSEMEADName:
6264583507Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
ALHAMBRAAffiliation City:
900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
Los AngelesAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description:
T0603704579CERS ID:
224825Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
4251 ROSEMEAD BLVD NAddress:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTERName:
CERS:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651
TC6684447.2s Page 140
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
91740Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
GlendoraAffiliation City:
1285 E Route 66Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
713 MCO PresidentEntity Name:
Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Teri RashEntity Name:
Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Marketing Company PresidentEntity Title:
Robert KelleyEntity Name:
Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
-118.073685Longitude:
34.083992Latitude:
UnknownRef Point Type Desc:
Not reportedCoord Name:
10339474Program ID:
HMBPEnv Int Type Code:
U-Haul of RosemeadFacility Name:
404650Site ID:
Coordinates:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
Adrian Zapata, Hitch ProEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
07-01-2019Eval Date:
Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type:
CERSEval Source:
HMRRPEval Program:
Los Angeles County Fire DepartmentEval Division:
site at time of inspection.
Caesar Reyes (Assistant Manager) Observed no significant violation onEval Notes:
Routine done by local agencyEval Type:
NoViolations Found:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651
TC6684447.2s Page 141
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
PhoenixAffiliation City:
2727 N Central AveAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Amerco Real Estate CompanyEntity Name:
Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc:
(626) 859-4500Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
U-Haul of RosemeadEntity Name:
OperatorAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
91740Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
GlendoraAffiliation City:
1285 E Route 66Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Mailing AddressEntity Name:
Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc:
(323) 890-4000Affiliation Phone:
90040-3027Affiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
CommerceAffiliation City:
5825 Rickenbacker RoadAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
Los Angeles County FireEntity Name:
CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
Not reportedAffiliation State:
Not reportedAffiliation City:
Not reportedAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
U-Haul Co of Los Angeles East.Entity Name:
Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc:
(626) 859-4500Affiliation Phone:
91740Affiliation Zip:
United StatesAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
GlendoraAffiliation City:
c/o U-Haul Co. of Los Angeles East, 1285 E Route 66Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
U-Haul Co. of CaliforniaEntity Name:
Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc:
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651
TC6684447.2s Page 142
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
(602) 263-6555Affiliation Phone:
85004Affiliation Zip:
United StatesAffiliation Country:
AZAffiliation State:
ROSEMEAD MOVING CENTER (Continued) S105032651
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
LOS ANGELESAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
CURT M. CHARMLEY - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description:
T10000002256CERS ID:
244419Site ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
820 EAST MISSION ROADAddress:
KC CLEANERSName:
CERS:
Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility:
Not reportedSite History:
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)Potential Contaminants of Concern:
SoilPotential Media Affected:
Not reportedFile Location:
115.0558RB Case Number:
Not reportedLocal Agency:
CMCCase Worker:
Cleanup Program SiteCase Type:
-118.0898761Longitude:
34.0905111Latitude:
Not reportedLead Agency Case Number:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Lead Agency:
T10000002256Global Id:
07/06/2010Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status:
STATERegion:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
820 EAST MISSION ROADAddress:
KC CLEANERSName:
CPS-SLIC:
2596 ft.
0.492 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
368 ft.
1/4-1/2 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
WNW CERS820 EAST MISSION ROAD N/A
34 CPS-SLICKC CLEANERS S110376582
TC6684447.2s Page 143
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
I-11507Reg Id:
LTNKAReg By:
19Facility County Code:
CORTESERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8614 VALLEYedr_fadd1:
RELIABLE LUMBER INCedr_fname:
HIST CORTESE:
2605 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster G
0.493 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
318 ft.
1/4-1/2 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
South 8614 VALLEY N/A
G35 HIST CORTESERELIABLE LUMBER INC S104160262
Not reportedPhone Number:
yrong@waterboards.ca.govEmail:
Los AngelesCity:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Address:
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Organization Name:
YUE RONGContact Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603703806Global Id:
6264583507Phone Number:
jawujo@dpw.lacounty.govEmail:
ALHAMBRACity:
900 S FREMONT AVEAddress:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYOrganization Name:
JOHN AWUJOContact Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type:
T0603703806Global Id:
LUST:
Not reportedSite History:
GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern:
SoilPotential Media Affect:
Not reportedLocal Case Number:
Not reportedFile Location:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLocal Agency:
I-11507RB Case Number:
JOACase Worker:
04/01/1993Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
-118.0817649Longitude:
34.0804125Latitude:
T0603703806Global Id:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0603703806Geo Track:
LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type:
LOS ANGELES COUNTYLead Agency:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8614 VALLEY BLVD EAddress:
RELIABLE LUMBER INCName:
LUST:
2605 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster G
0.493 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
318 ft.
1/4-1/2 CERSROSEMEAD, CA 91770
South Cortese8614 VALLEY BLVD E N/A
G36 LUSTRELIABLE LUMBER INC S105035494
TC6684447.2s Page 144
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedHow Leak Stopped:
Tank ClosureHow Leak Discovered:
4/1/1993Date the Case was Closed:
3/25/1993Date Case Last Changed on Database:
3/21/1989Date Leak Stopped:
11/13/1989Date Confirmation Began:
12/5/1989Date Leak Record Entered:
11/21/1989Date Leak First Reported:
3/21/1989Date Leak Discovered:
Not reportedEnforcement Type:
Not reportedCross Street:
19000Local Agency:
UNKStaff:
Not reportedW Global ID:
T0603703806Global ID:
Not reportedAbatement Method Used at the Site:
SoilCase Type:
Not reportedLocal Case No:
Not reportedSubstance Quantity:
GasolineSubstance:
Case ClosedStatus:
I-11507Facility Id:
Los AngelesCounty:
04Regional Board:
4Region:
LUST REG 4:
04/01/1993Status Date:
Completed - Case ClosedStatus:
T0603703806Global Id:
11/13/1989Status Date:
Open - Site AssessmentStatus:
T0603703806Global Id:
03/21/1989Status Date:
Open - Case Begin DateStatus:
T0603703806Global Id:
LUST:
Leak ReportedAction:
11/21/1989Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603703806Global Id:
Leak StoppedAction:
03/21/1989Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603703806Global Id:
Leak DiscoveryAction:
03/21/1989Date:
OtherAction Type:
T0603703806Global Id:
LUST:
RELIABLE LUMBER INC (Continued) S105035494
TC6684447.2s Page 145
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedWID Id:
Not reportedRegion 2:
Not reportedEffective Date:
Not reportedWaste Discharge System No:
Not reportedOrder No:
activeFlag:
Not reportedSwat R:
Not reportedEnf Type:
Not reportedOwner:
Not reportedLongitude:
Not reportedLatitude:
Not reportedSite Code:
Not reportedStatus Date:
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status:
LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type:
T0603703806Global ID:
Not reportedEnvirostor Id:
CORTESERegion:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8614 VALLEY BLVD EAddress:
RELIABLE LUMBER INCName:
CORTESE:
THEREFORE THE REGIONAL BOARD DOES NOT NEED TO ACT ON THIS CASE.
THE CASE FILE INDICATES THAT THE CASE WAS CLOSED ON APRIL 1,1993.Summary:
Not reportedAssigned Name:
Not reportedSuspended:
Not reportedCleanup Fund Id:
Not reportedPriority:
Not reportedBeneficial Use:
Not reportedLocal Agency Staff:
34.0804125 / -1Lat/Long:
LUSTProgram:
P.O. BOX 545, ROSEMEAD, 91770RP Address:
RELIABLE LUMBER INC.Responsible Party:
Not reportedOwner Contact:
Not reportedOrganization:
Not reportedSoil Qualifier:
Not reportedGW Qualifier:
Not reportedSignificant Interim Remedial Action Taken:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Soil:
Not reportedHist Max MTBE Conc in Groundwater:
Not reportedHistorical Max MTBE Date:
Not reportedEnforcement Action Date:
Not reportedPost Remedial Action Monitoring Began:
Not reportedRemedial Action Underway:
Not reportedRemediation Plan Submitted:
Not reportedPollution Characterization Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Began:
Not reportedPreliminary Site Assessment Workplan Submitted:
TankSource of Cleanup Funding:
1164.9534330746210994145568935Approx. Dist To Production Well (ft):
Not reportedWell Name:
Not reportedWater System:
Not reportedOperator:
TankLeak Source:
UNKCause of Leak:
RELIABLE LUMBER INC (Continued) S105035494
TC6684447.2s Page 146
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedAffiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
Los AngelesAffiliation City:
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200Affiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
YUE RONG - LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)Entity Name:
Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
6264583507Affiliation Phone:
Not reportedAffiliation Zip:
Not reportedAffiliation Country:
CAAffiliation State:
ALHAMBRAAffiliation City:
900 S FREMONT AVEAffiliation Address:
Not reportedEntity Title:
JOHN AWUJO - LOS ANGELES COUNTYEntity Name:
Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc:
Affiliation:
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description:
T0603703806CERS ID:
223597Site ID:
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770City,State,Zip:
8614 VALLEY BLVD EAddress:
RELIABLE LUMBER INCName:
CERS:
Active OpenFile Name:
Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name:
Not reportedSolid Waste Id No:
RELIABLE LUMBER INC (Continued) S105035494
49Assembly:
Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch:
Javier HinojosaSupervisor:
Not reportedProgram Manager:
SMBRPLead Agency:
SMBRPRegulatory Agencies:
NONPL:
0.16Acres:
SchoolSite Type Detailed:
School InvestigationSite Type:
304006Site Code:
08/16/2000Status Date:
No Further ActionStatus:
19820017Facility ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
1305/1311 SOUTH SAN GABRIEL BLVD.Address:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSIONName:
ENVIROSTOR:
3051 ft.
0.578 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
340 ft.
1/2-1 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
WSW SCH1305/1311 SOUTH SAN GABRIEL BLVD. N/A
37 ENVIROSTORGABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION S105628559
TC6684447.2s Page 147
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Phase IIComments:
08/23/1999Completed Date:
Other ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
02/07/2002Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/19/2000Completed Date:
Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
12/16/1999Completed Date:
Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Completed Info:
Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type:
19820017Alias Name:
Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type:
304006Alias Name:
Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type:
300780Alias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
SAN GABRIEL USD, SO. SAN GABRIEL BLVD.Alias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
SAN GABRIEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSIONAlias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCH AKA SAN GABRIEL USDAlias Name:
SOIL, SVPotential Description:
NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC:
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA Benzene
Xylenes Zinc Toluene Ethylbenzene Trichloroethylene (TCE
Selenium Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloroform 1,3,5-TrimethylbenzenePotential COC:
* EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use:
NONE SPECIFIEDAPN:
-118.0910Longitude:
34.08305Latitude:
School DistrictFunding:
NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req:
NORestricted Use:
Not reportedSpecial Program:
22Senate:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559
TC6684447.2s Page 148
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
19820017Facility ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
1305/1311 SOUTH SAN GABRIEL BLVD.Address:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSIONName:
SCH:
Not reportedSchedule Revised Date:
Not reportedSchedule Due Date:
Not reportedSchedule Document Type:
Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name:
Not reportedSchedule Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Due Date:
Not reportedFuture Document Type:
Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Area Name:
Phase 1Comments:
08/23/1999Completed Date:
Other ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Phase 1Comments:
09/30/1999Completed Date:
Other ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
June 2000.
April 13, 2000. The draft PEA report is expected to be submitted by
A Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) workplan was approved onComments:
04/13/2000Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
09/29/1999Completed Date:
Phase 1Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
08/16/2000Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
10/15/1999Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
01/11/2000Completed Date:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559
TC6684447.2s Page 149
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/19/2000Completed Date:
Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
12/16/1999Completed Date:
Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Completed Info:
Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type:
19820017Alias Name:
Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type:
304006Alias Name:
Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type:
300780Alias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
SAN GABRIEL USD, SO. SAN GABRIEL BLVD.Alias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
SAN GABRIEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSIONAlias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCH AKA SAN GABRIEL USDAlias Name:
SOIL, SVPotential Description:
NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA, Benzene, 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
Trichloroethylene (TCE, Tetrachloroethylene (PCE,
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, Xylenes, Zinc, Toluene, Ethylbenzene,
Selenium, Selenium, Dichlorodifluoromethane, Chloroform,Potential COC:
* EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use:
NONE SPECIFIEDAPN:
-118.0910Longitude:
34.08305Latitude:
School DistrictFunding:
NORestricted Use:
08/16/2000Status Date:
No Further ActionStatus:
Not reportedSpecial Program Status:
22Senate:
49Assembly:
304006Site Code:
Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch:
Javier HinojosaSupervisor:
Not reportedProject Manager:
DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description:
SMBRPLead Agency:
SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies:
NONational Priorities List:
0.16Acres:
NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.:
SchoolSite Type Detail:
School InvestigationSite Type:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559
TC6684447.2s Page 150
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Area Name:
Phase 1Comments:
08/23/1999Completed Date:
Other ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Phase 1Comments:
09/30/1999Completed Date:
Other ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
June 2000.
April 13, 2000. The draft PEA report is expected to be submitted by
A Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) workplan was approved onComments:
04/13/2000Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
09/29/1999Completed Date:
Phase 1Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
08/16/2000Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
10/15/1999Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
01/11/2000Completed Date:
Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Phase IIComments:
08/23/1999Completed Date:
Other ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
02/07/2002Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559
TC6684447.2s Page 151
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedSchedule Revised Date:
Not reportedSchedule Due Date:
Not reportedSchedule Document Type:
Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name:
Not reportedSchedule Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Due Date:
Not reportedFuture Document Type:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628559
Approval of PEA WorkplanComments:
03/18/2008Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Completed Info:
Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type:
60000801Alias Name:
Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type:
304585Alias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
Proposed 0.3 Acre Auto Repair Garage AcquistitionAlias Name:
SOILPotential Description:
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsConfirmed COC:
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsPotential COC:
EQUIPMENT/INSTRUMENT REPAIRPast Use:
NONE SPECIFIEDAPN:
-118.0910Longitude:
34.08134Latitude:
School DistrictFunding:
NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req:
NORestricted Use:
Not reportedSpecial Program:
22Senate:
49Assembly:
Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch:
Shahir HaddadSupervisor:
Angela GarciaProgram Manager:
SMBRPLead Agency:
SMBRPRegulatory Agencies:
NONPL:
0.3Acres:
SchoolSite Type Detailed:
School CleanupSite Type:
304585Site Code:
11/01/2015Status Date:
No Further ActionStatus:
60000801Facility ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
1519 S. SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARDAddress:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITEName:
ENVIROSTOR:
3605 ft.
0.683 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
331 ft.
1/2-1 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
SW SCH1519 S. SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD N/A
38 ENVIROSTORGABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE S102814385
TC6684447.2s Page 152
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedComments:
02/03/2015Completed Date:
CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
02/14/2008Completed Date:
Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Sent signed Agreement (FedEx) to District.Comments:
06/22/2009Completed Date:
School Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
close it out.
District has elected not to pursue this project, therefore DTSC willComments:
01/23/2012Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
lifts and UST.
DTSC conducted field work oversight for the removal of the hydraulicComments:
10/06/2014Completed Date:
FieldworkCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
02/04/2014Completed Date:
4.15 RequestCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
08/28/2015Completed Date:
Supplemental Site Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
12/23/2013Completed Date:
Supplemental Site Investigation Tech MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
a small area of PCB impacted soil.
DTSC approved the PEA Report with a further action determination forComments:
04/27/2009Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE (Continued) S102814385
TC6684447.2s Page 153
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Further ActionStatus:
Not reportedSpecial Program Status:
22Senate:
49Assembly:
304585Site Code:
Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch:
Shahir HaddadSupervisor:
Angela GarciaProject Manager:
DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description:
SMBRPLead Agency:
SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies:
NONational Priorities List:
0.3Acres:
NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.:
SchoolSite Type Detail:
School CleanupSite Type:
60000801Facility ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
1519 S. SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARDAddress:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITEName:
SCH:
Not reportedSchedule Revised Date:
Not reportedSchedule Due Date:
Not reportedSchedule Document Type:
Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name:
Not reportedSchedule Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Due Date:
Not reportedFuture Document Type:
Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Area Name:
Annual cost estimate emailed and mailed to BP.Comments:
09/17/2015Completed Date:
Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
4/4/16; closeout complete.
Closeout Form 1554 submitted on 9/10/15 and processed by CRBU onComments:
04/04/2016Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
07/01/2014Completed Date:
Amendment - Order/AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
08/27/2014Completed Date:
Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE (Continued) S102814385
TC6684447.2s Page 154
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
lifts and UST.
DTSC conducted field work oversight for the removal of the hydraulicComments:
10/06/2014Completed Date:
FieldworkCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
02/04/2014Completed Date:
4.15 RequestCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
08/28/2015Completed Date:
Supplemental Site Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
12/23/2013Completed Date:
Supplemental Site Investigation Tech MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
a small area of PCB impacted soil.
DTSC approved the PEA Report with a further action determination forComments:
04/27/2009Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Approval of PEA WorkplanComments:
03/18/2008Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Completed Info:
Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type:
60000801Alias Name:
Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type:
304585Alias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
Proposed 0.3 Acre Auto Repair Garage AcquistitionAlias Name:
SOILPotential Description:
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsConfirmed COC:
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsPotential COC:
EQUIPMENT/INSTRUMENT REPAIRPast Use:
NONE SPECIFIEDAPN:
-118.0910Longitude:
34.08134Latitude:
School DistrictFunding:
NORestricted Use:
11/01/2015Status Date:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE (Continued) S102814385
TC6684447.2s Page 155
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedSchedule Revised Date:
Not reportedSchedule Due Date:
Not reportedSchedule Document Type:
Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name:
Not reportedSchedule Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Due Date:
Not reportedFuture Document Type:
Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Area Name:
Annual cost estimate emailed and mailed to BP.Comments:
09/17/2015Completed Date:
Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
4/4/16; closeout complete.
Closeout Form 1554 submitted on 9/10/15 and processed by CRBU onComments:
04/04/2016Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
07/01/2014Completed Date:
Amendment - Order/AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
08/27/2014Completed Date:
Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
02/03/2015Completed Date:
CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
02/14/2008Completed Date:
Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Sent signed Agreement (FedEx) to District.Comments:
06/22/2009Completed Date:
School Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
close it out.
District has elected not to pursue this project, therefore DTSC willComments:
01/23/2012Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
GABRIELINO HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED 0.3 ACRE SITE (Continued) S102814385
TC6684447.2s Page 156
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
12/10/2001Completed Date:
Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
12/10/2002Completed Date:
Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Completed Info:
Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type:
19820032Alias Name:
Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type:
304210Alias Name:
EPA (FRS #)Alias Type:
110033606676Alias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
SAN GABRIEL USD-JEFFERSON MID SCH EXPANAlias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
SAN GABRIEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSIONAlias Name:
SOILPotential Description:
NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC:
LeadPotential COC:
SCHOOL - MIDDLEPast Use:
NONE SPECIFIEDAPN:
-118.0762Longitude:
34.1035Latitude:
School DistrictFunding:
NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req:
NORestricted Use:
Not reportedSpecial Program:
22Senate:
49Assembly:
Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch:
Daniel ZiarkowskiSupervisor:
Kamili SiglowideProgram Manager:
SMBRPLead Agency:
SMBRPRegulatory Agencies:
NONPL:
1Acres:
SchoolSite Type Detailed:
School CleanupSite Type:
304210Site Code:
04/26/2004Status Date:
CertifiedStatus:
19820032Facility ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
1358/1364 - 1374 EAST LAS TUNAS DRIVEAddress:
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSIONName:
ENVIROSTOR:
4991 ft.
0.945 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
412 ft.
1/2-1 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
North SCH1358/1364 - 1374 EAST LAS TUNAS DRIVE N/A
39 ENVIROSTORJEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION S105628565
TC6684447.2s Page 157
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedFuture Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/19/2002Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
12/10/2002Completed Date:
Technical ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/26/2004Completed Date:
Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/26/2004Completed Date:
Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
08/11/2000Completed Date:
Phase 1Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
09/09/2002Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
05/10/2002Completed Date:
Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
05/25/2004Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/26/2004Completed Date:
CertificationCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628565
TC6684447.2s Page 158
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Completed Info:
Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type:
19820032Alias Name:
Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type:
304210Alias Name:
EPA (FRS #)Alias Type:
110033606676Alias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
SAN GABRIEL USD-JEFFERSON MID SCH EXPANAlias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
SAN GABRIEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name:
Alternate NameAlias Type:
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSIONAlias Name:
SOILPotential Description:
NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC:
LeadPotential COC:
SCHOOL - MIDDLEPast Use:
NONE SPECIFIEDAPN:
-118.0762Longitude:
34.1035Latitude:
School DistrictFunding:
NORestricted Use:
04/26/2004Status Date:
CertifiedStatus:
Not reportedSpecial Program Status:
22Senate:
49Assembly:
304210Site Code:
Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch:
Daniel ZiarkowskiSupervisor:
Kamili SiglowideProject Manager:
DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description:
SMBRPLead Agency:
SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies:
NONational Priorities List:
1Acres:
NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.:
SchoolSite Type Detail:
School CleanupSite Type:
19820032Facility ID:
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776City,State,Zip:
1358/1364 - 1374 EAST LAS TUNAS DRIVEAddress:
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSIONName:
SCH:
Not reportedSchedule Revised Date:
Not reportedSchedule Due Date:
Not reportedSchedule Document Type:
Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name:
Not reportedSchedule Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Due Date:
Not reportedFuture Document Type:
Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name:
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628565
TC6684447.2s Page 159
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedComments:
12/10/2002Completed Date:
Technical ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/26/2004Completed Date:
Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/26/2004Completed Date:
Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
08/11/2000Completed Date:
Phase 1Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
09/09/2002Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
05/10/2002Completed Date:
Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
05/25/2004Completed Date:
Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/26/2004Completed Date:
CertificationCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
12/10/2001Completed Date:
Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
12/10/2002Completed Date:
Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type:
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628565
TC6684447.2s Page 160
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedSchedule Revised Date:
Not reportedSchedule Due Date:
Not reportedSchedule Document Type:
Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name:
Not reportedSchedule Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Due Date:
Not reportedFuture Document Type:
Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name:
Not reportedFuture Area Name:
Not reportedComments:
04/19/2002Completed Date:
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type:
Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name:
PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name:
JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued) S105628565
TC6684447.2s Page 161
ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 3 records.ROSEMEAD S121669406ROSEMEAD EXTENDION RECYCLED WATERGARVEY AVE WALNUT GROVE AVE KL91770CIWQSROSEMEAD S121669411ROSEMEAD RETAILSWC WALNUT GROVE AVE & RUSH ST91770CIWQSROSEMEAD S127034992WALNUT GROVE AVENUE AND RUSH STREEWALNUT GROVE AVENUE AND RUSH S91770LDSTC6684447.2s Page 162
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: 202-564-7333
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246
EPA Region 10
Telephone 206-553-8665
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4267
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-8704
Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6684447.2s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6684447.2s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: 843-820-7326
Last EDR Contact: 08/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-0695
Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-0695
Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: 202-267-2180
Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE: State Response Sites
Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity.
These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk.
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database
The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s)
EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate
further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL));
State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor
provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information,
including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for
reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses,
and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment
at contaminated sites.
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System
Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section
4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: 916-341-6320
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
TC6684447.2s Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report
Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources
Control Board’s LUST database.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9)
Telephone: 858-637-5595
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER)
Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management
system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: see region list
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer
to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.
Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8)
Telephone: 909-782-4496
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties.
Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7)
Telephone: 760-776-8943
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El
Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas,
Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5)
Telephone: 916-464-4834
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List
Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control
Board’s LUST database.
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4)
Telephone: 213-576-6710
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6684447.2s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties.
Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3)
Telephone: 805-542-4786
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa
Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2)
Telephone: 510-622-2433
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation
Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information,
please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1)
Telephone: 707-570-3769
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing
Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6)
Telephone: 760-241-7365
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing
For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database.
Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6)
Telephone: 530-542-5572
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1313
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: 404-562-8677
Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-665-6597
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: 312-886-7439
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: 206-553-2857
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 415-972-3372
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: 303-312-6271
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7003
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER)
Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations,
and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for
sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003
Number of Days to Update: 18
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1)
Telephone: 707-576-2220
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2)
Telephone: 510-286-0457
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3)
Telephone: 805-549-3147
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 47
Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4)
Telephone: 213-576-6600
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5)
Telephone: 916-464-3291
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch
Telephone: 619-241-6583
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6684447.2s Page GR-9
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region
Telephone: 530-542-5574
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 7: SLIC List
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region
Telephone: 760-346-7491
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8)
Telephone: 951-782-3298
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing
The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality
from spills, leaks, and similar discharges.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9)
Telephone: 858-467-2980
Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: FEMA
Telephone: 202-646-5797
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Active UST Facilities
Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: SWRCB
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC6684447.2s Page GR-10
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases
UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive
Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration
by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the
decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed
for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are
cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved
Orders.
Date of Government Version: 05/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-327-7844
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Military ust sites
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-327-5092
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1313
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: 206-553-2857
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: 312-886-6136
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-11
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: 303-312-6137
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: 415-972-3368
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-665-7591
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7003
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: 404-562-9424
Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents
have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for
DTSC’s costs.
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6684447.2s Page GR-12
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: 617-918-1102
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: 913-551-7365
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing
A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA
Process.
Date of Government Version: 06/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-323-7905
Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 06/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-2777
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database
Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the
Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed
of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information,
SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter
15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure
Information, and Interested Parties Information.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-13
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-227-4448
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycler Database
A listing of recycling facilities in California.
Date of Government Version: 06/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-3836
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
A listing of registered waste tire haulers.
Date of Government Version: 11/23/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Integrated Waste Management Board
Telephone: 916-341-6422
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-308-8245
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: 415-947-4219
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Telephone: 301-443-1452
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-14
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: 202-307-1000
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database
The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California
EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the
state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SCH: School Property Evaluation Program
This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous
materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the
level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose.
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug
lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either
requires or does not require additional cleanup work.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-255-6504
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup
has not yet been completed.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-227-4364
Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE
List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under
the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous
Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-15
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: CalEPA
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: 202-307-1000
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database.
Date of Government Version: 06/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing
Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and
maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained.
The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database
The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county
source for current data.
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991
Number of Days to Update: 18
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing
Aboveground storage tank sites
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health
Telephone: 415-252-3896
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-16
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database
The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage
tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data.
Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-341-5851
Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks
List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under
the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Local Land Records
LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing
A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder.
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-6023
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DEED: Deed Restriction Listing
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management
Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program
(SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current
or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed
restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management
Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land
use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by
the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or
part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed
restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: DTSC and SWRCB
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
TC6684447.2s Page GR-17
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: 202-366-4555
Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System
California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material
incidents (accidental releases or spills).
Date of Government Version: 04/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Office of Emergency Services
Telephone: 916-845-8400
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER)
Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system
for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER)
Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly
known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites
that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-18
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: (415) 495-8895
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: 202-528-4285
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: 888-275-8747
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: 888-275-8747
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 615-532-8599
Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-1917
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6684447.2s Page GR-19
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 617-520-3000
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-308-4044
Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-260-5521
Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-0250
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4203
Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6684447.2s Page GR-20
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-416-0223
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 05/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-8600
Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-4104
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-6023
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-0500
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6684447.2s Page GR-21
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: 202-566-1667
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-566-1667
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 03/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: 301-415-7169
Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 202-586-8719
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-22
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-566-0517
Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-343-9775
Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: 202-366-4595
Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-23
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 2
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020
Number of Days to Update: 151
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: 202-208-3710
Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 202-586-3559
Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: 505-845-0011
Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 703-603-8787
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
TC6684447.2s Page GR-24
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: 703-305-6451
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 05/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: 303-231-5959
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: 202-693-9424
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-7709
Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-25
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-7709
Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: 202-208-2609
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 05/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: EPA
Telephone: (415) 947-8000
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-0527
Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 06/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-2280
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
TC6684447.2s Page GR-26
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: 703-704-1564
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-385-6164
Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan
Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of
Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 916-255-2118
Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List
The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste
Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites).
Date of Government Version: 06/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing
list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2019
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department
Telephone: 925-454-2361
Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing
A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District
Telephone: 661-723-8070
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing
A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Telephone: 909-396-3211
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-27
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities
A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes:
power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries
and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and
garment services.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control
Telephone: 916-327-4498
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
EMI: Emissions Inventory Data
Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Air Resources Board
Telephone: 916-322-2990
Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ENF: Enforcement Action Listing
A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of
Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter.
Date of Government Version: 04/16/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-9379
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Financial Assurance information
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-255-3628
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure
that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the
owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board
Telephone: 916-341-6066
Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data
Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year
by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately
350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain
some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This
database begins with calendar year 1993.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-255-1136
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6684447.2s Page GR-28
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
ICE: ICE
Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor.
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control
Telephone: 877-786-9427
Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List
The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board
[SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the
state agency.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor.
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-323-3400
Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any
person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous
waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-440-7145
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MINES: Mines Site Location Listing
A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation.
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-322-1080
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing
The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting
and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the
state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-558-1784
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-29
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing
A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-9379
Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses
and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers;
Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation
Telephone: 916-445-4038
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PROC: Certified Processors Database
A listing of certified processors.
Date of Government Version: 06/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-3836
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records
Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the
Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency.
Date of Government Version: 03/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-445-3846
Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UIC: UIC Listing
A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database.
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Deaprtment of Conservation
Telephone: 916-445-2408
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Underground control injection sites
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resource Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined
pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality
Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that
more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-30
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 02/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region
Telephone: 559-445-5577
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WDS: Waste Discharge System
Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements.
Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5227
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List
Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area.
Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board
Telephone: 213-576-6726
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Military privatized sites
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Projects sites
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing
In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter
15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and
not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories
of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for
each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert,
pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5810
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System
The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water
Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders,
track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-31
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-794-4977
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data
The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in
California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides
an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California.
These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface
waters, and toxic materials
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Non-Case Information sites
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Other Oil & Gas Projects sites
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Produced water ponds sites
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Sampling point - public sites
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries,
and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC
wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored
TC6684447.2s Page GR-32
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System
DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and
manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility.
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-324-2444
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-6533
Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2497
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-33
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013
Number of Days to Update: 182
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-34
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
COUNTY RECORDS
ALAMEDA COUNTY:
CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites
A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from
chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination
from leaking petroleum USTs).
Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county.
Date of Government Version: 06/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
AMADOR COUNTY:
CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Amador County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-223-6439
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BUTTE COUNTY:
CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facility list.
Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 106
Source: Public Health Department
Telephone: 530-538-7149
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CALVERAS COUNTY:
CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa Facility Listing
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Calveras County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-754-6399
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COLUSA COUNTY:
TC6684447.2s Page GR-35
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Health & Human Services
Telephone: 530-458-0396
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY:
SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List
List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs.
Date of Government Version: 04/21/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department
Telephone: 925-646-2286
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DEL NORTE COUNTY:
CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Date of Government Version: 12/17/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 707-465-0426
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EL DORADO COUNTY:
CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department
Telephone: 530-621-6623
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FRESNO COUNTY:
CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List
Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous
waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials,
operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Dept. of Community Health
Telephone: 559-445-3271
Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
GLENN COUNTY:
TC6684447.2s Page GR-36
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District
Telephone: 830-934-6500
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HUMBOLDT COUNTY:
CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 2
Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
IMPERIAL COUNTY:
CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: San Diego Border Field Office
Telephone: 760-339-2777
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INYO COUNTY:
CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 760-878-0238
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
KERN COUNTY:
CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan.
Date of Government Version: 04/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Kern County Public Health
Telephone: 661-321-3000
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing
Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-37
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department
Telephone: 661-862-8700
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
KINGS COUNTY:
CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary
for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program
as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration,
permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Kings County Department of Public Health
Telephone: 559-584-1411
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LAKE COUNTY:
CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Lake County Environmental Health
Telephone: 707-263-1164
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LASSEN COUNTY:
CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Lassen County Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-251-8528
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES COUNTY:
AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County
San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date
of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former
Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009
Number of Days to Update: 206
Source: N/A
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6684447.2s Page GR-38
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List
Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites.
Date of Government Version: 07/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-3517
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County.
Date of Government Version: 07/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: La County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 818-458-5185
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills
Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Engineering & Construction Division
Telephone: 213-473-7869
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory
A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los
Angeles.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019
Number of Days to Update: 58
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills
This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce
and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable
refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County
Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality
Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health
Date of Government Version: 02/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2021
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-6973
Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory
A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-39
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
LOS ANGELES UST: Active & Inactive UST Inventory
A listing of active & inactive underground storage tank site locations and underground storage tank historical
sites, located in the City of Los Angeles.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List
Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint.
Date of Government Version: 05/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Community Health Services
Telephone: 323-890-7806
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank
Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city.
Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department
Telephone: 310-524-2236
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank
Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach.
Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department
Telephone: 562-570-2563
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank
Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance.
Date of Government Version: 02/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: City of Torrance Fire Department
Telephone: 310-618-2973
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MADERA COUNTY:
CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary
for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program
as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration,
permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.
Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Madera County Environmental Health
Telephone: 559-675-7823
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MARIN COUNTY:
TC6684447.2s Page GR-40
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites
Currently permitted USTs in Marin County.
Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: Public Works Department Waste Management
Telephone: 415-473-6647
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MENDOCINO COUNTY:
UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database
A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County.
Date of Government Version: 03/24/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 707-463-4466
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MERCED COUNTY:
CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Merced County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-381-1094
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MONO COUNTY:
CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List
CUPA Facility List
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Mono County Health Department
Telephone: 760-932-5580
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/3021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MONTEREY COUNTY:
CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing
CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division.
Date of Government Version: 06/23/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Monterey County Health Department
Telephone: 831-796-1297
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NAPA COUNTY:
TC6684447.2s Page GR-41
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.
Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 707-253-4269
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites
Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.
Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 707-253-4269
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NEVADA COUNTY:
CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Community Development Agency
Telephone: 530-265-1467
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ORANGE COUNTY:
IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups
Petroleum and non-petroleum spills.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups
Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST).
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities
Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST).
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PLACER COUNTY:
TC6684447.2s Page GR-42
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities
List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Placer County Health and Human Services
Telephone: 530-745-2363
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PLUMAS COUNTY:
CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List
Plumas County CUPA Program facilities.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Plumas County Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-283-6355
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RIVERSIDE COUNTY:
LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites
Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).
Date of Government Version: 06/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List
Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county.
Date of Government Version: 06/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SACRAMENTO COUNTY:
CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List
List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List
Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks,
waste generators.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/01/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN BENITO COUNTY:
TC6684447.2s Page GR-43
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 4
Source: San Benito County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY:
PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits
This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers,
hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers.
Date of Government Version: 05/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division
Telephone: 909-387-3041
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN DIEGO COUNTY:
HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database
The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment
’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information
provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous
waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information
on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases
in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination
are included.)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division
Telephone: 619-338-2268
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities
San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 619-338-2209
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing
A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are
closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without
a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 858-505-6874
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6684447.2s Page GR-44
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing
The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with
hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program.
Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 619-338-2371
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY:
CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facilities
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 415-252-3896
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County
Telephone: 415-252-3920
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information
Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 415-252-3920
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY:
UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST
A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county.
Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Health Department
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY:
CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.
Date of Government Version: 05/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department
Telephone: 805-781-5596
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN MATEO COUNTY:
TC6684447.2s Page GR-45
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory
List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division
Telephone: 650-363-1921
Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county.
Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division
Telephone: 650-363-1921
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY:
CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing
CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division.
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department
Telephone: 805-686-8167
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SANTA CLARA COUNTY:
CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 02/24/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 408-918-1973
Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report
A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county.
Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health.
Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District
Telephone: 408-265-2600
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing
A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county.
Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 408-918-3417
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6684447.2s Page GR-46
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities
Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: City of San Jose Fire Department
Telephone: 408-535-7694
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY:
CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing.
Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health
Telephone: 831-464-2761
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SHASTA COUNTY:
CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 51
Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management
Telephone: 530-225-5789
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SOLANO COUNTY:
LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.
Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 707-784-6770
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.
Date of Government Version: 06/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 707-784-6770
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SONOMA COUNTY:
CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List
Cupa Facility list
TC6684447.2s Page GR-47
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 8
Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department
Telephone: 707-565-1174
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 707-565-6565
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
STANISLAUS COUNTY:
CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection
Telephone: 209-525-6751
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SUTTER COUNTY:
UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 530-822-7500
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TEHAMA COUNTY:
CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facilities
Date of Government Version: 01/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-527-8020
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TRINITY COUNTY:
CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 760-352-0381
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TULARE COUNTY:
TC6684447.2s Page GR-48
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa program facilities
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division
Telephone: 559-624-7400
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TUOLUMNE COUNTY:
CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: Divison of Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-533-5633
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VENTURA COUNTY:
BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks
The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste
Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information.
Date of Government Version: 03/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites
Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites
Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).
Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List
To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the
Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and
disposal of medical waste throughout the County.
Date of Government Version: 03/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 2
Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6684447.2s Page GR-49
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List
Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List.
Date of Government Version: 05/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
YOLO COUNTY:
UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report
Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county.
Date of Government Version: 06/22/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Yolo County Department of Health
Telephone: 530-666-8646
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
YUBA COUNTY:
CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing for Yuba County.
Date of Government Version: 04/21/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department
Telephone: 530-749-7523
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 03/24/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: 860-424-3375
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6684447.2s Page GR-50
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: 518-402-8651
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-783-8990
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 401-222-2797
Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: 312-280-5991
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: 410-786-3000
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-51
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: 301-594-6248
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities
Source: Department of Social Services
Telephone: 916-657-4041
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6684447.2s Page GR-52
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TC6684447.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
2012Version Date:
5630799 EL MONTE, CATarget Property Map:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
358 ft. above sea levelElevation:
3772282.2UTM Y (Meters):
400253.4UTM X (Meters):
Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator:
118.08119 - 118˚ 4’ 52.28’’Longitude (West):
34.088326 - 34˚ 5’ 17.97’’Latitude (North):
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
8601 MISSION DRIVE
BORNSTEIN - ROSEMEAD
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®
TC6684447.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 358 ft.
North South
West East288296303303317327336343350358365376378384389396403410418371364361360359354363363359358357355351347341334329323321General SSEGeneral Topographic Gradient:
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6684447.2s Page A-3
Not Reported
GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION
GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
Not found Status:
1.25 miles Search Radius:
Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*:
* ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under
a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation.
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapEL MONTE
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property
Not Reported
Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data06037C1675F
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6684447.2s Page A-4
> 10 inchesDepth to Bedrock Max:
> 10 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Not reportedSoil Drainage Class:
Not reportedHydrologic Group:
variableSoil Surface Texture:
URBAN LAND Soil Component Name:
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra:
QuaternarySystem:
QuaternarySeries:
QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6684447.2s Page A-5
clay loam
silty clay loam
gravelly - fine sandy loam
sand
weathered bedrock
very fine sandy loam
stratified
very gravelly - sandy loam
sandy loam
gravelly - sandy loamDeeper Soil Types:
sand
silty clay
clay
sandy clay loam
sandy clay
gravelly - loam
fine sandy loamShallow Soil Types:
fine sandy loam
sand
gravelly - sand
fine sand
clay
silt loam
gravelly - sandy loam
sandy loamSurficial Soil Types:
fine sandy loam
sand
gravelly - sand
fine sand
clay
silt loam
gravelly - sandy loam
sandy loamSoil Surface Textures:
appear within the general area of target property.
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Min: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Max: 0.00Not reportedNot reportedvariable 6 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Permeability
Rate (in/hr)
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6684447.2s Page A-6
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1345 D18
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1460 D17
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECADWR0000028853 15
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWCADDW0000022751 D14
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWCADDW0000007807 D13
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWCADDW0000009937 D12
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWCADDW0000015184 D11
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWCADDW0000015013 C10
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW1466 C9
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthCAPFAS000001581 A7
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthCADDW0000008556 A6
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECADDW0000006517 A4
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECADDW0000005750 B3
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
1/2 - 1 Mile SECA1900009 39
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1/2 - 1 Mile NWUSGS40000141018 J45
1/2 - 1 Mile ESEUSGS40000140771 F30
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWUSGS40000140874 C26
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWUSGS40000140888 C16
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWUSGS40000140873 C8
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNEUSGS40000140901 B5
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthUSGS40000140902 A2
1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNWUSGS40000140887 1
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1.000State Database
Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS
1.000Federal USGS
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC6684447.2s Page A-7
1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADWR0000009716 48
1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADDW0000004164 H47
1/2 - 1 Mile NW1465 J46
1/2 - 1 Mile ESE1384 I44
1/2 - 1 Mile ESE1383 I43
1/2 - 1 Mile ESE1382 I42
1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADDW0000010906 H41
1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADDW0000007016 H40
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000128204 G38
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000018727 G37
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000059464 G36
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000140551 G35
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000119179 G34
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000082364 G33
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCAEDF0000057008 G32
1/2 - 1 Mile ESECADDW0000007554 F31
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWCADDW0000018640 29
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWCADWR0000016234 E28
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWCADWR0000029756 E27
1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESECADWR0000021278 25
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNWCADWR0000005621 24
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1462 D23
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1463 D22
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1464 D21
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1461 D20
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW1344 D19
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
4 8 0
4 8 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
4 4 0 40 0
400
4 0 0
4 0 0
360
3 6 0 3603 6 0
3 6032032032 03203 20 320
280
28028 0
CA
TC6684447.2s Page A-9
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: 001S011W07N002SMonitor Location:
USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-CAOrganization ID:
B5
NNE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
USGS40000140901FED USGS
A4
NNE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADDW0000006517CA WELLS
B3
NNE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADDW0000005750CA WELLS
ftWell Hole Depth Units:
578Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
578Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: 001S011W07N001SMonitor Location:
USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-CAOrganization ID:
A2
North
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
USGS40000140902FED USGS
ftWell Hole Depth Units:
340Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
340Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: 001S012W13A001SMonitor Location:
USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-CAOrganization ID:
1
NNW
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
USGS40000140887FED USGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-10
8559Connection:45000Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip:
CAState:ROSEMEADCity:
P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname:
San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
ARStatus:2Precision:
1180509.0Longitude:340525.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INAKEStation ty:WELL 12Source nam:
GWater type:1910144System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910144010Frds no:
01S/12W-13B04 SPrim sta c:1466Seq:
C9
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
1466CA WELLS
ftWell Hole Depth Units:
339Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
339Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: 001S012W13B001SMonitor Location:
USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-CAOrganization ID:
C8
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
USGS40000140873FED USGS
A7
North
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CAPFAS000001581CA WELLS
A6
North
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADDW0000008556CA WELLS
ftWell Hole Depth Units:
670Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
670Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-11
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:03-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
190.Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.96Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
6.2Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
2.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical:
4.5Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.8Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.9Finding:07-NOV-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.9Finding:05-DEC-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:03-JAN-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.77Finding:11-JAN-18Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:06-FEB-18Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:06-MAR-18Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.5Finding:03-APR-18Sample date:
SAN GABRIELArea serve:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-12
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.9Finding:06-SEP-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:04-OCT-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.86Finding:19-OCT-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.9Finding:01-NOV-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:06-DEC-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:03-JAN-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.5Finding:11-JAN-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.6Finding:08-FEB-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.4Finding:07-MAR-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.6Finding:11-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.74Finding:13-APR-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:02-MAY-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:06-JUN-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:03-JUL-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:17-JUL-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.1Finding:02-AUG-17Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-13
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.5Finding:05-APR-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical:
0.47Finding:13-APR-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical:
0.782Finding:13-APR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.63Finding:13-APR-16Sample date:
1.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical:
1.8Finding:13-APR-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.573Finding:13-APR-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical:
0.2Finding:13-APR-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.504Finding:13-APR-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.231Finding:13-APR-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.6Finding:04-MAY-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.9Finding:05-JUL-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
200.Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.9Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:02-AUG-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-14
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
38.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
7.2Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
27.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
98.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
170.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
140.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.6Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
350.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical:
21.67Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
8.3Finding:07-JUL-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.74Finding:16-JUL-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.7Finding:04-AUG-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.4Finding:06-OCT-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:09-OCT-15Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.4Finding:13-JAN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.73Finding:13-JAN-16Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-15
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.6Finding:03-FEB-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.6Finding:03-MAR-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.Finding:07-APR-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.Finding:04-MAY-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.4Finding:02-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.93Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
11.57Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.7Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical:
0.38Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
210.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
140.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.83Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
16.Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
8.9Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.1Finding:11-JUN-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-16
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.2Finding:06-MAY-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.Finding:01-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.2Finding:05-AUG-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.9Finding:02-SEP-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.7Finding:07-OCT-14Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.88Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.1Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical:
3.9Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.84Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
210.Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.4Finding:01-DEC-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.1Finding:06-JAN-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.8Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.61Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-17
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
200.Finding:13-AUG-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
5.Finding:13-AUG-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.5Finding:03-SEP-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
5.3Finding:26-SEP-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.1Finding:01-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.73Finding:15-OCT-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.5Finding:05-NOV-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.1Finding:03-DEC-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
5.8Finding:07-JAN-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
5.6Finding:09-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.57Finding:09-JAN-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.1Finding:04-FEB-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.3Finding:04-MAR-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.6Finding:01-APR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.53Finding:08-APR-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-18
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
3.8Finding:06-JUN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
4.2Finding:03-JUL-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
4.5Finding:07-AUG-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
4.8Finding:04-SEP-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
4.9Finding:07-NOV-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
3.5Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
3.6Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
2.6Finding:09-JAN-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
2.9Finding:05-FEB-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
3.5Finding:05-MAR-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
3.8Finding:02-APR-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
5.4Finding:07-MAY-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
5.5Finding:04-JUN-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
5.5Finding:02-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
5.9Finding:06-AUG-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-19
0.Dlr:
CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical:
23.78Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
310.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.7Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
140.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
170.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
11.51Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
3.8Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical:
0.32Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
180.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.92Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
16.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
8.5Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
5.1Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
18.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
67.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-20
15
NNE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADWR0000028853CA WELLS
D14
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
CADDW0000022751CA WELLS
D13
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
CADDW0000007807CA WELLS
D12
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
CADDW0000009937CA WELLS
D11
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
CADDW0000015184CA WELLS
C10
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADDW0000015013CA WELLS
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
3.1Finding:07-FEB-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
2.9Finding:06-MAR-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
3.2Finding:04-APR-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
2.9Finding:01-MAY-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
43.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-21
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
ARStatus:8Precision:
1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:1948 - GRANDSource nam:
GWater type:1910139System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910139010Frds no:
01S/11W-07N02 SPrim sta c:1345Seq:
D18
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
1345CA WELLS
SAN GABRIELArea serve:
8559Connection:45000Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip:
CAState:ROSEMEADCity:
P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname:
San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
IUStatus:8Precision:
1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 10 - INACTIVESource nam:
GWater type:1910144System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910144008Frds no:
01S/12W-12K01 SPrim sta c:1460Seq:
D17
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
1460CA WELLS
ftWell Hole Depth Units:
883Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
800Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: 001S012W13B003SMonitor Location:
USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-CAOrganization ID:
C16
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
USGS40000140888FED USGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-22
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:01-MAR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:01-MAR-17Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
9.6Finding:01-MAR-17Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:08-JUN-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:08-JUN-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:08-JUN-17Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
220.Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.8Finding:20-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:05-DEC-17Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:05-DEC-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:05-DEC-17Sample date:
SAN MARINOArea serve:
13902Connection:49353Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91108Zip:
CAState:SAN MARINOCity:
2020 HUNTINGTON DRIVEAddress:CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COHqname:
Cal. American Water Co.-San MarinoSystem nam:1910139System no:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-23
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
150.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
190.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.6Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
140.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
39.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
11.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
23.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.2Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
8.5Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
17.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.78Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
230.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical:
0.96Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.4Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:05-DEC-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.78Finding:05-DEC-16Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-24
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical:
0.47Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.48Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical:
0.28Finding:15-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
9.9e-002Finding:15-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical:
0.73Finding:15-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:07-SEP-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.9Finding:07-SEP-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.88Finding:07-SEP-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical:
1.6Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical:
0.26Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CARBON DIOXIDEChemical:
2500.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
380.Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
8.1Finding:14-SEP-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-25
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
168.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical:
1.5Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
10.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM (TOTAL)Chemical:
12.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical:
28.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.85Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
18.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
8.9Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.53Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
39.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
11.Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
24.1Finding:06-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
6.9e-002Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical:
0.253Finding:09-JUN-16Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-26
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:01-SEP-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:01-SEP-15Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.69Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
8.1Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
220.Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:15-SEP-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:05-OCT-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:05-OCT-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.99Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.74Finding:02-MAR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:02-MAR-16Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:25-MAY-16Sample date:
100.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-27
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.82Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
17.4Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical:
28.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
189.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
10.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM (TOTAL)Chemical:
13.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.75Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.6Finding:01-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:01-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:04-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:06-JUL-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.9Finding:06-JUL-15Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
9.7Finding:28-JUL-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:05-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:05-AUG-15Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-28
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:02-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.78Finding:05-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:05-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:06-APR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:06-APR-15Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.72Finding:08-APR-15Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
9.81Finding:23-APR-15Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:23-APR-15Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:27-APR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:04-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:04-MAY-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
11.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
23.2Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
8.9Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
39.Finding:27-MAY-15Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-29
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:06-OCT-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:03-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:03-NOV-14Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
11.12Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:01-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:01-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:03-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.69Finding:03-DEC-14Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.Finding:04-DEC-14Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
9.93Finding:04-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:05-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:05-JAN-15Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
10.21Finding:26-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:02-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.6Finding:02-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:02-MAR-15Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-30
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
140.Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
9.8Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.3Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.9Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:04-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:04-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:02-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:02-SEP-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.3Finding:03-SEP-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
220.Finding:03-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:03-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.73Finding:03-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:06-OCT-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-31
MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical:
31.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.88Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
19.8Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
10.3Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
21.1Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
14.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.96Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.9Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
140.Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.9Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.2Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
9.9Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
380.Finding:05-JUN-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
380.Finding:16-JUN-14Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-32
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.72Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.Finding:14-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:14-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.Finding:14-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:14-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
46.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical:
2100.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.29Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
10.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM (TOTAL)Chemical:
12.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
197.Finding:19-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-33
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CARBON DIOXIDEChemical:
4700.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
140.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
180.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
150.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.8Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
370.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical:
0.34Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
39.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.6Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-34
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.9Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
11.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
22.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.4Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
8.2Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
17.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.84Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
9.8Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
220.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical:
0.7Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical:
1600.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-35
MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical:
27.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
189.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
10.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM (TOTAL)Chemical:
11.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.6Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.79Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical:
2.8Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical:
1.18Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-36
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.72Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:08-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:08-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
20.8Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical:
1600.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.89Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.6Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
40.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
11.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
8.7Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
17.5Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.87Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-37
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
5.96Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.9Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.78Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.6Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.6Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-38
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.85Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.3Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
240.Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
40.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
12.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
23.1Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
8.8Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
17.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.86Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical:
29.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
195.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-39
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.36Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.36Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.41Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.71Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.9Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-40
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.6Finding:13-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:13-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:13-MAY-14Sample date:
SAN MARINOArea serve:
13902Connection:49353Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91108Zip:
CAState:SAN MARINOCity:
2020 HUNTINGTON DRIVEAddress:CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COHqname:
Cal. American Water Co.-San MarinoSystem nam:1910139System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
ARStatus:8Precision:
1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:ROSEMEAD (1957)Source nam:
GWater type:1910139System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910139014Frds no:
01S/11W-07N01 SPrim sta c:1344Seq:
D19
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
1344CA WELLS
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.7Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
6.34Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.8Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-41
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:05-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:05-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:05-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
27.4Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
23.4Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
17.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
53.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.98Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical:
32.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
148.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
29.25Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical:
6600.Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
17.6Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:13-MAY-14Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-42
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:02-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
38.Finding:04-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:06-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:05-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-43
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
200.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
160.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.8Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
500.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
290.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical:
0.85Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
36.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CARBON DIOXIDEChemical:
4800.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical:
4.7Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
52.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:04-NOV-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-44
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
36.Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
7.2Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.93Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
26.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
18.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.5Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
25.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
17.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical:
8300.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
200.Finding:12-SEP-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-45
PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical:
3.1Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical:
1.6e-002Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
3.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical:
3.11Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
31.Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.297Finding:06-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:09-SEP-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-46
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
22.9Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
16.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
50.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.35Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
16.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:06-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:03-JUN-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-47
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:04-MAR-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.2Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:08-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:08-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:08-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:08-APR-13Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
157.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical:
30.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.99Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
25.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical:
6400.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-48
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:03-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
30.Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:04-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:04-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-49
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
24.6Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
15.7Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
23.3Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.99Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SILICAChemical:
32.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
161.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:01-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:05-NOV-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-50
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.2Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:01-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:05-SEP-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
290.Finding:18-SEP-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
26.29Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
51.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
17.Finding:26-SEP-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-51
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.71Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:21-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.4Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.6Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
23.Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:26-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-52
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.96Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.2Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.2Finding:03-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.89Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.43Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-53
CAState:ROSEMEADCity:
P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname:
San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
IRStatus:8Precision:
1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 06 - INACTIVESource nam:
GWater type:1910144System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910144004Frds no:
01S/12W-13B02 SPrim sta c:1464Seq:
D21
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
1464CA WELLS
SAN MARINOArea serve:
13902Connection:49353Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91108Zip:
CAState:SAN MARINOCity:
2020 HUNTINGTON DRIVEAddress:CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COHqname:
Cal. American Water Co.-San MarinoSystem nam:1910139System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
ARStatus:8Precision:
1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:RICHARDSON WELL 01Source nam:
GWater type:1910139System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910139025Frds no:
01S/12W-13A01 SPrim sta c:1461Seq:
D20
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
1461CA WELLS
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.1Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.4Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:15-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.1Finding:22-MAR-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-54
24
NNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADWR0000005621CA WELLS
SAN MARINOArea serve:
13902Connection:49353Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91108Zip:
CAState:SAN MARINOCity:
2020 HUNTINGTON DRIVEAddress:CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COHqname:
Cal. American Water Co.-San MarinoSystem nam:1910139System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
IUStatus:5Precision:
1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation ty:RICHARDSON WELL 02 - INACTIVESource nam:
GWater type:1910139System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910139028Frds no:
01S/12W-13A02 SPrim sta c:1462Seq:
D23
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
1462CA WELLS
SAN GABRIELArea serve:
8559Connection:45000Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip:
CAState:ROSEMEADCity:
P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname:
San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
ARStatus:8Precision:
1180500.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 05Source nam:
GWater type:1910144System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910144003Frds no:
01S/12W-13B01 SPrim sta c:1463Seq:
D22
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
1463CA WELLS
SAN GABRIELArea serve:
8559Connection:45000Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-55
ftWell Hole Depth Units:
403Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
403Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: 001S011W18K001SMonitor Location:
USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-CAOrganization ID:
F30
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
USGS40000140771FED USGS
29
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADDW0000018640CA WELLS
E28
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADWR0000016234CA WELLS
E27
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CADWR0000029756CA WELLS
ftWell Hole Depth Units:
401Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
363Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: 001S012W13B002SMonitor Location:
USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-CAOrganization ID:
C26
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
USGS40000140874FED USGS
25
ESE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
CADWR0000021278CA WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-56
PrivateOwner: CWSPwstype:
Purch_surface_waterPsource longname: 173Pwssvcconn:
300Retpopsrvd: ActiveStatus:
06037Fipscounty: Not ReportedZipserved:
CAStateserved: Not ReportedCityserved:
ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPwsname: CA1900009Pwsid:
CAState: 09Epa region:
39
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CA1900009FRDS PWS
G38
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CAEDF0000128204CA WELLS
G37
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CAEDF0000018727CA WELLS
G36
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CAEDF0000059464CA WELLS
G35
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CAEDF0000140551CA WELLS
G34
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CAEDF0000119179CA WELLS
G33
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CAEDF0000082364CA WELLS
G32
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CAEDF0000057008CA WELLS
F31
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CADDW0000007554CA WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-57
10/27/2004Enforcement Action: 2005Enforcemnt FY:
SOrig Code: 0412001Violation ID:
Not ReportedCmp edt:
07/01/1993Cmp bdt: 0State mcl:
Not ReportedUnit of measure: 0Violation measur:
LCRRule name: 350Rule code:
Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation name: 51Violation code:
Lead and Copper RuleContamination Name: 5000Contamination code:
1993Violation Year: CAState:
FOrig code: 95V0001Violation id:
01/31/2005Cmp edt:
01/01/2005Cmp bdt: Not ReportedState mcl:
Not ReportedUnit of measure: Not ReportedViolation measur:
TCRRule name: 110Rule code:
MCL, Monthly (TCR)Violation name: 22Violation code:
Coliform (TCR)Contamination Name: 3100Contamination code:
2005Violation Year: CAState:
SOrig code: 0504001Violation id:
09/30/2004Cmp edt:
09/01/2004Cmp bdt: Not ReportedState mcl:
Not ReportedUnit of measure: Not ReportedViolation measur:
TCRRule name: 110Rule code:
Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)Violation name: 23Violation code:
Coliform (TCR)Contamination Name: 3100Contamination code:
2004Violation Year: CAState:
SOrig code: 0412001Violation id:
1180418Longitude: 340450Latitude:
UntreatedTreatment: 101 - 500 PersonsPopulation served:
91770System zip: CASystem state:
ROSEMEADSystem city: 9267 E. RIO DOLLSystem address:
ADAM RANCH MUTUAL WATER CO.System address:
ADAM RANCH MUTUAL WATER CO.System name: 00000500Retail population:
Not ReportedDate system deactivated: 7706Date system activated:
ActiveActivity status: CA1900009PWS ID:
Not ReportedContact telephone: 6263508181Contact zip:
91Contact state: CAContact city:
ROSEMEADContact address: 9238-46 LOWER AZUSA RD.Contact address:
Dominic CimarustiContact: 300Retail population served:
CPWS type code: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name:
91770PWS zip: CAPWS state:
ROSEMEADPWS city: Not ReportedPWS address:
ADAM RANCH MUTUAL WATER CO.PWS name:
System Owner/Responsible PartyPWS type: CA1900009PWS ID:
300Population: Purchased ground waterSource code:
ADAMS RANCH MUTUALOwner: 91770Zip:
CAState: ROSEMEADECity:
Not ReportedCare of: Not ReportedAddress:
ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name: CA1900009PWS ID:
APwsactivitycode:
91770Contactzip: CAContactstate:
ROSEMEADContactcity: Not ReportedContactaddress2:
9238-46 LOWER AZUSA RD.Contactaddress1: 6263508181Contactphone:
CA1900009-ADAMS RANCH MUTUALContactorgname: DOMINIC _CIMARUSTIContact:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-58
P.O. BOX 9016Address:SOUTHERN CALIF WATER COHqname:
Scwc-South ArcadiaSystem nam:1910212System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
SRStatus:8Precision:
1180400.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:ENCINITAS WELL 02 - STANDBYSource nam:
GWater type:1910212System no:
METUser id:15District:
19County:1910212003Frds no:
01S/11W-18A04 SPrim sta c:1382Seq:
I42
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
1382CA WELLS
H41
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CADDW0000010906CA WELLS
H40
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CADDW0000007016CA WELLS
0Violation measurement:
7/8/2009 0:00:00Enforcement action: No Enf Action as ofEnforcement date:
12/31/2025 0:00:00Compliance end date: 7/1/1993 0:00:00Compliance start date:
Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation type: LEAD & COPPER RULEContaminant:
95V0001Violation ID: CPWS type code:
300Population served: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name:
Not ReportedViolation measurement:
State AO (w/o Penalty) IssuedEnforcement action: 3/25/2005 0:00:00Enforcement date:
1/31/2005 0:00:00Compliance end date: 1/1/2005 0:00:00Compliance start date:
Max Contaminant Level, Monthly (TCR)Violation type:
COLIFORM (TCR)Contaminant:
0504001Violation ID: CPWS type code:
300Population served: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name:
Not ReportedViolation measurement:
State AO (w/o Penalty) IssuedEnforcement action: 10/27/2004 0:00:00Enforcement date:
9/30/2004 0:00:00Compliance end date: 9/1/2004 0:00:00Compliance start date:
Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)Violation type: COLIFORM (TCR)Contaminant:
0412001Violation ID: CPWS type code:
300Population served: ADAMS RANCH MUTUALPWS name:
FormalEnforcement Category:
St AO (w/o penalty) issuedEnforcement Detail:
03/25/2005Enforcement Action: 2005Enforcemnt FY:
SOrig Code: 0504001Violation ID:
FormalEnforcement Category:
St AO (w/o penalty) issuedEnforcement Detail:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-59
4.4Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.3Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.4Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.4Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.4Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date:
Not ReportedArea serve:
6980Connection:23034Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91773Zip:
CAState:SAN DIMASCity:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-60
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:10-JUL-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:07-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:07-AUG-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.1Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.72Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
7.9Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
240.Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.9Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-61
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.4Finding:09-JAN-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.9Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.5Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.Finding:16-MAR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:16-MAR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:10-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:10-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:08-MAY-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:08-MAY-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.1Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:10-JUL-17Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-62
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.3Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
240.Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.1Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.1Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.9Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.2Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:09-JAN-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-63
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:11-APR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.3Finding:11-APR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:10-MAY-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:10-MAY-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.7Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.6Finding:14-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:14-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.6Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-64
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.9Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
1.7Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.9Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:11-JAN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.3Finding:11-JAN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.7Finding:08-FEB-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:08-FEB-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.1Finding:08-FEB-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.1Finding:17-FEB-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:17-FEB-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.6Finding:17-FEB-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-65
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical:
0.35Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
250.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.67Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
23.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
11.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.3Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
23.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
10.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.91Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
170.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
210.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
140.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
41.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.5Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.1Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-66
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.4Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
17.Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.4Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.9Finding:13-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.178Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.606Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical:
0.2Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical:
0.14Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units:
RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical:
0.47Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.7Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical:
1.e-002Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
400.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-67
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.2Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.4Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.2Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
16.Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:13-APR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.2Finding:13-APR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.7Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.4Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.1Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
14.Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.2Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-68
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.1Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
210.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.1Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
7.Finding:17-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:17-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.2Finding:17-NOV-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.3Finding:17-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.9Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.9Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-69
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.4Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:07-APR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.7Finding:07-APR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.3Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.9Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.3Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.6Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.6Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.6Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.68Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-70
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:08-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.8Finding:12-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:12-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.2Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
8.2Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.9Finding:09-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:09-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:13-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:13-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
16.Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.2Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-71
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.1Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
7.8Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.4Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
250.Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.4Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.3Finding:08-OCT-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-72
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.77Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.9Finding:10-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:10-DEC-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:08-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.Finding:08-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.3Finding:12-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:12-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.9Finding:21-FEB-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.7Finding:21-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:21-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:12-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.6Finding:12-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:09-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.7Finding:09-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-73
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
25.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.5Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
10.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
20.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.71Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical:
1.1Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
250.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.9Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.8Finding:11-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:11-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.7Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:13-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.3Finding:13-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-74
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:16-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.8Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date:
1.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical:
2.4Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical:
21.1Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
420.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, FIELDChemical:
8.04Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
8.04Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
160.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
200.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
150.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
42.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
10.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-75
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
8.Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.4Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.3Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:10-APR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.6Finding:10-APR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.1Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.2Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.9Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.8Finding:12-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:12-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.9Finding:16-JUL-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-76
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.86Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.9Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.66Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date:
Not ReportedArea serve:
6980Connection:23034Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91773Zip:
CAState:SAN DIMASCity:
P.O. BOX 9016Address:SOUTHERN CALIF WATER COHqname:
Scwc-South ArcadiaSystem nam:1910212System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
SRStatus:8Precision:
1180400.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:ENCINITAS WELL 01 - STANDBYSource nam:
GWater type:1910212System no:
METUser id:15District:
19County:1910212002Frds no:
01S/11W-18A05 SPrim sta c:1383Seq:
I43
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
1383CA WELLS
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-77
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.9Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.9Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.4Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.8Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.4Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.9Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.96Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-78
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.5Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.69Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:16-MAR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:16-MAR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:10-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:10-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:23-AUG-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
4.4Finding:23-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:23-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.2Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
240.Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:06-SEP-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-79
PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical:
2.4Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.97Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
240.Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
2.4Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.81Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
4.3Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.97Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-80
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:11-JAN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:11-JAN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
3.9Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.95Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.74Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
7.6Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
3.7Finding:22-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.87Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.6Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date:
1.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-81
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
9.6Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
21.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.73Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
250.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical:
0.4Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
190.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:12-OCT-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.2Finding:12-OCT-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.1Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
5.1Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-82
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
23.Finding:13-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
22.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
11.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
40.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
150.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
230.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.92Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
390.Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.3Finding:17-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-83
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.4Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.8Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:13-APR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:13-APR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.4Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.75Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-84
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.9Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
260.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.9Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
7.5Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.9Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.96Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-85
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.1Finding:10-MAR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:10-MAR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.6Finding:07-APR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:07-APR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.93Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.3Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.6Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.2Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.2Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.4Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-86
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:08-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.9Finding:08-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:12-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.8Finding:12-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.7Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:14-NOV-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:09-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.Finding:09-DEC-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:13-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:13-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.3Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-87
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.4Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.8Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.9Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.4Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.74Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.94Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.4Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
260.Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:10-SEP-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-88
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:11-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:11-SEP-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.3Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:13-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.8Finding:13-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.Finding:16-NOV-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.83Finding:28-FEB-13Sample date:
4.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:PERCHLORATEChemical:
5.7Finding:28-FEB-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:19-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.88Finding:19-MAR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.9Finding:09-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:09-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-89
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
440.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical:
1.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
260.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.83Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
22.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
20.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.6Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, FIELDChemical:
7.98Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.98Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
160.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
200.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
170.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
45.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
13.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
22.Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-90
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.91Finding:10-APR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:10-APR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.84Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.4Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.2Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:12-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.5Finding:12-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.1Finding:16-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:16-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.83Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.93Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.9Finding:16-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical:
22.2Finding:21-AUG-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-91
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
ARStatus:8Precision:
1180400.0Longitude:340500.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:ENCINITAS WELL 03Source nam:
GWater type:1910212System no:
METUser id:15District:
19County:1910212004Frds no:
01S/11W-18A06 SPrim sta c:1384Seq:
I44
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
1384CA WELLS
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.93Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
9.Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.98Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.76Finding:16-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:16-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.89Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-92
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.1Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
16.Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
5.4Finding:29-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.8Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
17.Finding:12-DEC-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
14.Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.6Finding:10-JAN-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.6Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
15.Finding:13-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
4.2Finding:14-FEB-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
16.Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.7Finding:13-MAR-18Sample date:
Not ReportedArea serve:
6980Connection:23034Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91773Zip:
CAState:SAN DIMASCity:
P.O. BOX 9016Address:SOUTHERN CALIF WATER COHqname:
Scwc-South ArcadiaSystem nam:1910212System no:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-93
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:10-JUL-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:07-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:07-AUG-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
3.7Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
7.8Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
280.Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.85Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.6Finding:10-AUG-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:11-SEP-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.2Finding:09-OCT-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.1Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
15.Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
5.3Finding:13-NOV-17Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-94
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
3.5Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.2Finding:16-FEB-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.8Finding:24-MAR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
19.Finding:24-MAR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.8Finding:10-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
17.Finding:10-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:08-MAY-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:08-MAY-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.6Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
3.7Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date:
1.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical:
3.1Finding:16-MAY-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:10-JUL-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-95
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
3.5Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.1Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:12-SEP-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.2Finding:10-OCT-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
14.Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.7Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
5.Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:17-NOV-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.4Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
14.Finding:12-DEC-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:09-JAN-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:09-JAN-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:14-FEB-17Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-96
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
180.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
46.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
15.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
20.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
13.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
22.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.77Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
280.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical:
0.54Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:11-JUL-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.1Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:08-AUG-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:19-AUG-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-97
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.9Finding:11-APR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
14.Finding:11-APR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.5Finding:10-MAY-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:10-MAY-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
4.7Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:11-MAY-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.6Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.6Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
460.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
8.01Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
180.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
220.Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
4.1Finding:20-JUN-16Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-98
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.5Finding:12-OCT-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:12-OCT-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.1Finding:09-NOV-15Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
5.1Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.5Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:17-NOV-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.8Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:07-DEC-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.8Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
4.4Finding:08-MAR-16Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-99
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.3Finding:13-APR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:11-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:19-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.Finding:08-JUN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.6Finding:14-JUL-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.3Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:10-AUG-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
25.Finding:13-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.6Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.5Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
270.Finding:14-AUG-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.1Finding:08-SEP-15Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-100
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
7.1Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.7Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.5Finding:10-NOV-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.4Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:08-DEC-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.5Finding:12-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.3Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:09-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.2Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.4Finding:19-FEB-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.9Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.6Finding:09-MAR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.4Finding:13-APR-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-101
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical:
1.6e-002Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.3Finding:09-JUN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:07-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.4Finding:11-AUG-14Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.73Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
16.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
270.Finding:28-AUG-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.2Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.Finding:08-SEP-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:13-OCT-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.5Finding:05-NOV-14Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-102
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.7Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
20.Finding:07-APR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.Finding:07-APR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.7Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.2Finding:12-MAY-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
17.Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
6.Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.28Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units:
RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical:
0.418Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical:
0.276Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical:
0.2Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.547Finding:15-MAY-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-103
NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical:
10.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical:
0.37Finding:29-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:11-JUN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
10.Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.2Finding:09-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.1Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:12-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.5Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
280.Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
12.Finding:14-AUG-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
4.7Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
15.Finding:10-FEB-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
17.Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:26-FEB-14Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-104
0.Dlr:
UNITSReport units:COLORChemical:
2.5Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
450.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.64Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
170.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
200.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
170.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
45.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
13.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
19.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
16.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
25.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.78Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
290.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical:
0.1Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-105
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.Finding:14-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.8Finding:13-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:10-APR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.4Finding:10-APR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.6Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:08-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
9.2Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.7Finding:15-MAY-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.6Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
11.Finding:13-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
13.Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
5.1Finding:15-MAY-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.4Finding:23-MAY-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-106
SAN GABRIELArea serve:
8559Connection:45000Pop serv:
Not ReportedZip ext:91770Zip:
CAState:ROSEMEADCity:
P.O. BOX 2227Address:Not ReportedHqname:
San Gabriel CwdSystem nam:1910144System no:
Not ReportedComment 7:
Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5:
Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3:
Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1:
ARStatus:3Precision:
1180520.0Longitude:340555.0Latitude:
WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 11Source nam:
GWater type:1910144System no:
4THUser id:07District:
19County:1910144009Frds no:
01S/12W-13B03 SPrim sta c:1465Seq:
J46
NW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
1465CA WELLS
ftWell Hole Depth Units:
827Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
821Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
18070105HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: 001S012W12K001SMonitor Location:
USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-CAOrganization ID:
J45
NW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
USGS40000141018FED USGS
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
8.4Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.8Finding:10-JAN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
7.7Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:09-FEB-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-107
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
220.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
58.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
19.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
28.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.6Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
20.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
38.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.79Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
100.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:BORONChemical:
140.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
340.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical:
0.79Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX AT SOURCE TEMP.Chemical:
0.18Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
12.01Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.6Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
14.Finding:11-JAN-18Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.9Finding:11-JAN-18Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-108
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
13.Finding:11-JAN-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.9Finding:11-JAN-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
13.Finding:13-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.8Finding:13-APR-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.7Finding:17-JUL-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
14.Finding:17-JUL-17Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
3.1Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
14.Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
350.Finding:18-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
220.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
180.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
570.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical:
19.7Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
14.Finding:26-OCT-17Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-109
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
29.Finding:04-MAY-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.32Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
3.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical:
5.79Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
7.3Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.63Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
13.Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical:
0.2Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical:
0.47Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.436Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical:
0.183Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
1.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226Chemical:
7.6e-002Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical:
4.e-002Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
5.e-003Dlr:
UG/LReport units:1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANEChemical:
9.2e-003Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
340.Finding:18-JUL-16Sample date:
0.4Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical:
12.Finding:07-NOV-16Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-110
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
24.Finding:05-AUG-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
24.Finding:02-SEP-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
24.Finding:07-OCT-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.2Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
270.Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
23.Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
32.Finding:01-DEC-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
27.Finding:06-JAN-15Sample date:
5.e-003Dlr:
UG/LReport units:1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANEChemical:
8.e-003Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.6Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
42.Finding:14-JAN-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.Finding:03-FEB-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.Finding:17-FEB-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.Finding:03-MAR-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
27.Finding:07-APR-15Sample date:
2.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-111
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:15-OCT-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
27.Finding:05-NOV-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
29.Finding:03-DEC-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
27.Finding:07-JAN-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
27.Finding:09-JAN-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:09-JAN-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
37.Finding:04-FEB-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.Finding:04-MAR-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
28.Finding:01-APR-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.7Finding:08-APR-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
25.Finding:08-APR-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
24.Finding:06-MAY-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
26.Finding:02-JUN-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
23.Finding:01-JUL-14Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
23.Finding:14-JUL-14Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-112
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:02-APR-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical:
2.7Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.5Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
22.Finding:10-APR-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
25.Finding:07-MAY-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
22.Finding:04-JUN-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:02-JUL-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:15-JUL-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:06-AUG-13Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
260.Finding:13-AUG-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
5.5Finding:13-AUG-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
22.Finding:03-SEP-13Sample date:
1.Dlr:
UG/LReport units:CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical:
5.7Finding:26-SEP-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:01-OCT-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-113
MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
150.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical:
39.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:03-JUL-12Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.88Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.3Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:07-AUG-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:14-AUG-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:04-SEP-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.6Finding:09-OCT-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
22.Finding:07-NOV-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:02-JAN-13Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
1.8Finding:09-JAN-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:09-JAN-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:05-FEB-13Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:05-MAR-13Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-114
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical:
30.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical:
1.1Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical:
12.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical:
22.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.1Dlr:
MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical:
0.86Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical:
250.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60 CChemical:
0.41Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
20.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical:
11.61Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical:
12.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
CReport units:SOURCE TEMPERATURE CChemical:
21.56Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical:
410.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical:
7.4Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical:
170.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical:
200.Finding:04-JUN-12Sample date:
0.Dlr:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-115
48
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CADWR0000009716CA WELLS
H47
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CADDW0000004164CA WELLS
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
27.Finding:04-JAN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
31.Finding:17-JAN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.Finding:17-JAN-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.78Finding:17-JAN-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:07-FEB-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:06-MAR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TETRACHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
2.3Finding:18-APR-12Sample date:
0.5Dlr:
UG/LReport units:TRICHLOROETHYLENEChemical:
0.68Finding:18-APR-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
30.Finding:18-APR-12Sample date:
2.Dlr:
MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical:
21.Finding:01-MAY-12Sample date:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC6684447.2s Page A-116
0%0%100%0.933 pCi/LBasement
Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor
0%2%98%0.711 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor
% >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea
Number of sites tested: 63
Federal Area Radon Information for LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for LOS ANGELES County: 2
21191770
______________________
> 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode
Radon Test Results
State Database: CA Radon
AREA RADON INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information SystemR
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: 800-672-5559
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6684447.2s Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program
State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5577
The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing
the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA
data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources,
Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide
Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local
Groundwater Projects.
Water Well Database
Source: Department of Water Resources
Telephone: 916-651-9648
California Drinking Water Quality Database
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-324-2319
The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California
since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information.
California Oil and Gas Well Locations
Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division
Telephone: 916-323-1779
Oil and Gas well locations in the state.
California Earthquake Fault Lines
Source: California Division of Mines and Geology
The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the
United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault
lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and
Geology.
RADON
State Database: CA Radon
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-210-8558
Radon Database for California
TC6684447.2s Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-356-4020
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-356-4020
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines,
prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault
lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6684447.2s Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Appendix E Historical Records October 6, 2021
Project No.: 185805355 E.1
Appendix E HISTORICAL RECORDS
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
September 30, 2021
6684447.3
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
page-
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:
Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
Contact:EDR Inquiry #
Site Name: Client Name:
Certification #
PO #
Project
09/30/21
8601 Mission Drive
Bornstein - Rosemead Stantec
735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280
Rosemead, CA 91770
6684447.3
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
Josh Sargent
The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Stantec were identified for
the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps
from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to
grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be
authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.
The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the
day this report was generated.
B194-4226-B870
185805355
UNMAPPED PROPERTY
Bornstein - Rosemead
This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library,
LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target
property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property
were not found.
Certification #: B194-4226-B870
Stantec (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the
limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be
permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's
copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
6684447 3 2
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
September 30, 2021
6684447.4
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:
P.O.#
Project:
Maps Provided:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein
are the property of their respective owners.
page-
Coordinates:
Latitude:
Longitude:
UTM Zone:
UTM X Meters:
UTM Y Meters:
Elevation:
Contact:
Site Name: Client Name:
2012
1994
1991
1981
1972
1966
1953
1948
1926, 1928
1923, 1924
1900
1896
1894
09/30/21
Bornstein - Rosemead Stantec
8601 Mission Drive 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280
Rosemead, CA 91770 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
6684447.4 Josh Sargent
EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by
Stantec were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in
evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a
search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s.
185805355 34.088326 34° 5' 18" North
Bornstein - Rosemead -118.08119 -118° 4' 52" West
Zone 11 North
400255.69
3772476.96
357.08' above sea level
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
6684447 4 2
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
2012 Source Sheets
2012
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
1994 Source Sheets
1994
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1978
1991 Source Sheets
1991
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1978
1981 Source Sheets
1981
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1978
6684447 4 3
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
1972 Source Sheets
1972
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1972
1966 Source Sheets
1966
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1964
1953 Source Sheets
1953
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1952
1948 Source Sheets
1948
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
6684447 4 4
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
1926, 1928 Source Sheets
1926
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
1926
Alhambra
7.5-minute, 24000
1928
Altadena
7.5-minute, 24000
1928
Sierra Madre
7.5-minute, 24000
1923, 1924 Source Sheets
1923
El Monte
7.5-minute, 24000
1924
Alhambra
7.5-minute, 24000
1900 Source Sheets
1900
Pasadena
15-minute, 62500
1900
Los Angeles
15-minute, 62500
1896 Source Sheets
1896
Pasadena
15-minute, 62500
6684447 4 5
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
1894 Source Sheets
1894
Los Angeles
15-minute, 62500
6684447 4 6
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
2012
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 2012, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 7
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1994
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1994, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 8
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1991
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1991, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 9
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1981
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1981, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 10
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1972
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1972, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 11
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1966
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1966, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 12
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1953
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1953, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 13
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1948
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1948, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 14
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1926, 1928
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1926, 7.5-minute
NE, Sierra Madre, 1928, 7.5-minute
SW, Alhambra, 1926, 7.5-minute
NW, Altadena, 1928, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 15
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1923, 1924
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, El Monte, 1923, 7.5-minute
SW, Alhambra, 1924, 7.5-minute
6684447 4 16
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1900
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, Pasadena, 1900, 15-minute
TP, Los Angeles, 1900, 15-minute
6684447 4 17
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1896
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, Pasadena, 1896, 15-minute
6684447 4 18
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1894
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Stantec
TP, Los Angeles, 1894, 15-minute
6684447 4 19
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Inquiry Number:
September 30, 2021
6684447.8
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2016 1"=500'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP
2002 1"=500'Flight Date: June 11, 2002 USDA
1994 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1994 USGS/DOQQ
1989 1"=500'Flight Date: August 22, 1989 USDA
1981 1"=500'Flight Date: February 17, 1981 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific
1979 1"=500'Flight Date: May 11, 1979 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific
1977 1"=500'Flight Date: April 25, 1977 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific
1964 1"=500'Flight Date: July 28, 1964 USGS
1952 1"=500'Flight Date: August 02, 1952 USGS
1948 1"=500'Flight Date: July 10, 1948 USGS
1938 1"=500'Flight Date: May 06, 1938 USDA
1928 1"=500'Flight Date: January 01, 1928 FAIR
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 09/30/21
Bornstein - Rosemead
Site Name:Client Name:
Stantec
8601 Mission Drive 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280
Rosemead, CA 91770 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
EDR Inquiry #6684447.8 Contact:Josh Sargent
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
6684447 8-page 2
6684447.8
2016
= 500'
6684447.8
2012
= 500'
6684447.8
2009
= 500'
6684447.8
2005
= 500'
6684447.8
2002
= 500'
6684447.8
1994
= 500'
6684447.8
1989
= 500'
6684447.8
1981
= 500'
6684447.8
1979
= 500'
6684447.8
1977
= 500'
6684447.8
1964
= 500'
6684447.8
1952
= 500'
6684447.8
1948
= 500'
6684447.8
1938
= 500'
6684447.8
1928
= 500'
Bornstein - Rosemead
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Inquiry Number: 6684447.5
September 30, 2021
The EDR-City Directory Abstract
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and
surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER
IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING
OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.
BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER
CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR
EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses,
estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and
are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any
environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional
can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is
not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in
part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.
All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.
EDR’s City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each
address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals.
Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at
approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2015. This report compiles
information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and
gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property.
A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report.
RECORD SOURCES
EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun
& Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to
provide a more comprehensive report.
EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The
purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction
of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright.
RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where
information was identified in the source and provided in this report.
Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image
2015 Cole Information Services -X X -
2009 Cole Information Services -X X -
2006 Haines Company -X X -
2004 Cole Information Services -X X -
Haines Company ----
2003 Haines & Company ----
2001 Haines & Company, Inc.----
2000 Pacific Bell Telephone ----
1999 Cole Information Services -X X -
Haines Company -X X -
6684447-5 Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image
1996 GTE ----
1995 Pacific Bell -X X -
1994 Cole Information Services -X X -
1992 PACIFIC BELL WHITE PAGES ----
1991 Pacific Bell ----
1990 PACIFIC BELL WHITE PAGES ----
1986 Pacific Bell -X X -
1985 Pacific Bell -X X -
Pacific Bell X X X -
1981 Pacific Telephone -X X -
1980 Pacific Telephone -X X -
Pacific Telephone X X X -
1976 Pacific Telephone -X X -
1975 Pacific Telephone -X X -
Pacific Telephone X X X -
1972 R. L. Polk & Co.----
1971 Pacific Telephone -X X -
1970 Pacific Telephone ----
1969 Pacific Telephone ----
1967 R. L. Polk & Co.----
1966 Pacific Telephone -X X -
Pacific Telephone X X X -
1965 GTE ----
1964 Pacific Telephone ----
1963 Pacific Telephone ----
1962 Pacific Telephone ----
1961 R. L. Polk & Co.----
1960 Pacific Telephone -X X -
Pacific Telephone X X X -
1958 Pacific Telephone ----
1957 Pacific Telephone -X X -
Pacific Telephone X X X -
1956 Pacific Telephone ----
1955 R. L. Polk & Co.----
1954 R. L. Polk & Co.----
1952 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1951 Los Angeles Directory Co Publishers ----
1950 Pacific Telephone ----
6684447-5 Page 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image
1949 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1948 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1947 Pacific Directory Co.----
1946 Southern California Telephone Co ----
1945 The Glendale Directory Co.----
1944 R. L. Polk & Co.----
1942 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1940 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1939 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1938 Los Angeles Directory Company
Publishers
----
1937 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1936 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1935 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1934 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1933 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1932 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1931 Los Angeles Directory Company
Publishers
----
1930 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1929 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1928 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1927 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1926 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1925 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1924 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1923 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1921 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
1920 Los Angeles Directory Co.----
6684447-5 Page 3
FINDINGS
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
FINDINGS DETAIL
Target Property research detail.
MISSION DR
8601 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
1985 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY
SAINTS THE STAKES LOS ANGELES CALIFORN
Pacific Bell
1980 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY
SAINTS STAKES LOS ANGLES EAST STAKE
WA
Pacific Telephone
1975 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY
SAINTS
Pacific Telephone
1966 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY
SAINTS THE WARDS
Pacific Telephone
1960 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY
SAINTS THE WARDS
Pacific Telephone
1957 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY
SAINTS THE WARDS ALHAMBRA WARD
Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 4
FINDINGS
ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL
The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided
for each address.
BARTLETT AVE
4471 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 H LINDA Cole Information Services
2009 LINDA MA Cole Information Services
2006 D MA Linda Haines Company
2004 LINDA MA Cole Information Services
1957 KUHN IRWIN J Pacific Telephone
4512 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 DUO ZHEN Cole Information Services
2009 DUO ZHEN Cole Information Services
JOSE KARAM Cole Information Services
JIN CAO Cole Information Services
PATRICIA CHIFFER Cole Information Services
2006 e CHIFFER Patla Haines Company
2004 LILIA KARAM Cole Information Services
1999 PATRICIA CHIFFER Cole Information Services
JOSE KARAM Cole Information Services
DUO ZHEN Cole Information Services
4518 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 KEN TRUONG Cole Information Services
2009 NGOAN TRUONG Cole Information Services
2006 TRAN Suu T Haines Company
o KHEN My Haines Company
2004 NGOAN TRUONG Cole Information Services
1999 NGOAN TRUONG Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 5
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1994 ERNST, WALTER E Cole Information Services
1985 ERNST WALTER E Pacific Bell
1980 ERNST WALTER E BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 ERNST WALTER E Pacific Telephone
1966 ERNST WALTER E Pacific Telephone
4523 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 YIK CHHAN Cole Information Services
2009 YIK CHHAN Cole Information Services
2006 CHAO Hov Haines Company
2004 HOV CHAO Cole Information Services
1999 YIK CHHAN Cole Information Services
4524 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 DAVID WONG Cole Information Services
2009 DAVID WONG Cole Information Services
2006 LEE Paul Haines Company
2004 DAVID WONG Cole Information Services
1999 DAVID WONG Cole Information Services
1985 LIM ALICE Pacific Bell
4528 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 THOMAS RAUTH Cole Information Services
2009 THOMAS RAUTH Cole Information Services
2006 RAUTH John Haines Company
1999 THOMAS RAUTH Cole Information Services
1995 Rauth John Pacific Bell
Rauton Christina & Rick Whit Pacific Bell
1994 RAUTH, JOHN Cole Information Services
1985 RAUTH JOHN Pacific Bell
1980 RAUTH JOHN BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 6
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1975 RAUTH JOHN Pacific Telephone
4529 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 KOKICHI MAKAZAWA Cole Information Services
2009 KENZO KOBAYASHI Cole Information Services
2006 o NAKAZAWAKoklchl Haines Company
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1999 KENZO KOBAYASHI Cole Information Services
1980 RYAN JOHN E BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1966 RYAN JOHN E Pacific Telephone
4532 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 RONALD LEE Cole Information Services
2009 ALBERT LEE Cole Information Services
2004 ALBERT LEE Cole Information Services
1999 ALBERT LEE Cole Information Services
1980 QUARRY GENE BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 QUARRY GENE Pacific Telephone
1966 STUDER ROBT P Pacific Telephone
4535 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 RICHARD LENK Cole Information Services
2009 RICHARD LENK Cole Information Services
2006 LENK Richard G Haines Company
2004 RICHARD LENK Cole Information Services
1999 RICHARD LENK Cole Information Services
1995 Lenk Richard G Pacific Bell
Lenkin H Pacific Bell
1994 LENK, RICHARD G Cole Information Services
1985 LENK RICHARD G Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 7
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1980 LENK RICHARD G BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
LENK ROGER E BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 LENK RICHARD G Pacific Telephone
4538 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 DANNY DAM Cole Information Services
2006 o DAM Danny Haines Company
2004 THI TAO Cole Information Services
1999 DANNY DAM Cole Information Services
1995 Dam Phuc D Pacific Bell
1994 DAM, PHUC D Cole Information Services
1975 ALBO ALBERT R Pacific Telephone
4539 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 A KRETTEK Cole Information Services
2006 No Current Listing Haines Company
2004 YING WANG Cole Information Services
1999 A KRETTEK Cole Information Services
1994 LAPIAN, BENNY A Cole Information Services
1985 ASHIZAWA KATSUJIRO Pacific Bell
1980 ASHIZAWA KATSIUJIRO BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 ASHIZAWA KATSUJIR Pacific Telephone
4544 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 HALINA LIU Cole Information Services
2009 LILLIAN ROSSIGNOLI Cole Information Services
2006 HERNANDEZ Gloria Haines Company
2004 GLORIA HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 8
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1985 MC CLELLAN FOREST Pacific Bell
1980 MCCLELLAN FOREST BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1966 MCCLELLAN FOREST Pacific Telephone
4545 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 LAIRD ANDERSON Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 ANDERSON Laird Haines Company
SHIPLEY Paul D Haines Company
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1995 Shipley Paul D Pacific Bell
1985 SHIPLEY PAUL D ROSEMEAD Pacific Bell
1980 SHIPLEY PAUL D BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 SHIPLEY PAUL D Pacific Telephone
1966 SHIPLEY PAUL D Pacific Telephone
4549 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 MARCO DARDON Cole Information Services
2009 MARCO DARDON Cole Information Services
2006 DARDON Marco Haines Company
2004 MARCO DARDON Cole Information Services
1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
MARCO DARDON Cole Information Services
1985 DARDON MARCO ANTONIO Pacific Bell
DARDON MARCO ANTONIO Pacific Bell
1980 DARDON MARCO ANTONIO BARTLETT
AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
DARDON MARCO ANTONIO BARTLETT
AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 DARDON MARCO ANTONIO Pacific Telephone
1966 DARDON MARCO ANTONIO Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 9
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4550 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 JIMMIE MORENO Cole Information Services
2009 GILBERT MORENO Cole Information Services
2004 GILBERT MORENO Cole Information Services
1999 GILBERT MORENO Cole Information Services
1985 MORENO MICHAEL Pacific Bell
1980 MORENO GILBERT N BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 MORENO GILBERT N Pacific Telephone
1966 MORENO GILBERT N Pacific Telephone
4602 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 NHON LAM Cole Information Services
2009 HONG LAM Cole Information Services
2006 LAN Binh Haines Company
2004 HONG LAM Cole Information Services
1999 HONG LAM Cole Information Services
1985 MARQUEZ JUAN JOSE Pacific Bell
1975 MALONEY MICHAEL A Pacific Telephone
1966 MALONEY MICHAEL A Pacific Telephone
1960 RAUTH JOHN Pacific Telephone
1957 RAUTH JOHN Pacific Telephone
4603 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 ANITA BANH Cole Information Services
2009 ALEXANDER NGO Cole Information Services
2006 BANH Anit Haines Company
NGO Alexander D Haines Company
2004 ALEXANDER NGO Cole Information Services
1999 ALEXANDER NGO Cole Information Services
1995 Banh Anita Pacific Bell
Ngo Alexander Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 10
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1995 Ngo Amie Y Pacific Bell
Ngo An Khon Sll E Maple Av Mon Pacific Bell
1994 NGO, A Cole Information Services
BANH, ANITA Cole Information Services
1985 ROBERTSON EARL Pacific Bell
1980 ROBERTSON EARL BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 ROBERTSON EARL Pacific Telephone
1966 ROBERTSON EARL Pacific Telephone
1960 KALTE RUTH A MRS Pacific Telephone
EDGAR WM R Pacific Telephone
1957 EDGAR WM R Pacific Telephone
4606 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 GLORIA CORDOVA Cole Information Services
2009 GLORIA CORDOVA Cole Information Services
2006 CORDOVA Gloria Haines Company
2004 GLORIA MENDOZA Cole Information Services
1999 GLORIA CORDOVA Cole Information Services
1960 MAURO JOHN Pacific Telephone
1957 MAURO JOHN Pacific Telephone
4607 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 FENGYI SITU Cole Information Services
2009 RONG SITU Cole Information Services
2006 SITU Rong Haines Company
2004 RONG SITU Cole Information Services
1999 RONG SITU Cole Information Services
1995 Vollrath G Pacific Bell
1994 VOLLRATH, GWEN Cole Information Services
1985 VOLLRATH G Pacific Bell
1980 VOLLRATH ROLAND F BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 11
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1975 VOLLRATH ROLAND F Pacific Telephone
1966 VOLLRATH ROLAND F Pacific Telephone
1960 VOLLRATH ROLAND F Pacific Telephone
1957 VOLLRATH ROLAND F Pacific Telephone
4612 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 BRIAN MOSELEY Cole Information Services
2009 ROSS ROTH Cole Information Services
2006 a ROTH Ross T Haines Company
2004 ROSS ROTH Cole Information Services
1999 ROSS ROTH Cole Information Services
1995 Roth Ross T Pacific Bell
Roth Sibyl Pacific Bell
Roth Steven Whit Pacific Bell
Roth Timothy & Katherlne Pacific Bell
Roth V Pacific Bell
1994 ROTH, ROSS T Cole Information Services
1985 ROTH ROSS T Pacific Bell
1980 ROTH ROSS T BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 ROTH ROSS T Pacific Telephone
1966 ROTH RASS T Pacific Telephone
1960 ROTH ROSS T Pacific Telephone
1957 ROTH ROSS T Pacific Telephone
4613 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 CARLOS VILLAGRAN Cole Information Services
2009 LAWRENCE SCHINTZ Cole Information Services
2006 SCHINTZ Lawrence L Haines Company
VILLAGRAN Carlos Haines Company
2004 LAWRENCE SCHINTZ Cole Information Services
1999 LAWRENCE SCHINTZ Cole Information Services
1994 SCHINTZ, LAURIE L Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 12
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1985 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L Pacific Bell
1980 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1966 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L Pacific Telephone
1960 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L Pacific Telephone
1957 SCHINTZ LAWRENCE L Pacific Telephone
4616 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 STONECYPHER Haines Company
William Haines Company
1980 STONECYPHER JOYCE BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1966 KORBONSKI JOHN A Pacific Telephone
1960 TRAYLOR GLENN Pacific Telephone
1957 TRAYLOR GLENN Pacific Telephone
4617 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 WILLIAM STONECYPHER Cole Information Services
2009 WILLIAM STONECYPHER Cole Information Services
2006 WIllam Haines Company
e STONECYPHER Haines Company
2004 WILLIAM STONECYPHER Cole Information Services
1999 WILLIAM STONECYPHER Cole Information Services
1966 POORE STANLEY R Pacific Telephone
1960 POORE STANLEY R Pacific Telephone
1957 POORE STANLEY R Pacific Telephone
4623 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 MIKE TO Cole Information Services
2009 MIKE TO Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 13
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2006 TO Mike Haines Company
2004 MIKE TO Cole Information Services
1999 MIKE TO Cole Information Services
1975 CALDERON MARIO S Pacific Telephone
1966 GERBERICK JAS H Pacific Telephone
1960 GERBERICK JAS H Pacific Telephone
1957 GERBERICK JAS H Pacific Telephone
4624 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 SAMMY DO Cole Information Services
2009 WEIQIN WU Cole Information Services
2006 o LEE Carol Haines Company
2004 CAROL LEE Cole Information Services
BENJAMIN TAGLER Cole Information Services
1999 WEIQIN WU Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1960 COLLINS FRANK H Pacific Telephone
1957 KALTE RUTH A MRS Pacific Telephone
4629 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 QUYEN TO Cole Information Services
2009 QUYEN TO Cole Information Services
2006 a TO Quyen Haines Company
2004 QUYEN TO Cole Information Services
1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
QUYEN TO Cole Information Services
4634 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 JEFF ORONZO Cole Information Services
2009 JEFFREY ORONZO Cole Information Services
2006 ORONZO Jeffrey Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 14
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1999 JEFFREY ORONZO Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
4706 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 WARD THOS BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4710 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 LEIGH J DENNIS BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4715 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 ROY ROLAND A BARTLETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1966 ROY ROLAND A Pacific Telephone
4725 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1995 L Chang Denny Pacific Bell
4732 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1975 STURROCK WM III ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4702 1/2 BARTLETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1985 AVILA LUIS Pacific Bell
1980 AVILA LUIS BARTLETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 AVILA LUIS Pacific Telephone
BARTLETT ST
4512 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 KARAM Jose Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 15
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4518 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 ERNST Walter E Haines Company
4524 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 LEE Or S Haines Company
4528 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 RAUTH John Haines Company
4529 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 NAKAZAWA Kokichi Haines Company
4532 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 LEE Julie N Haines Company
4535 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 LENK Richard G Haines Company
4538 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 DAM Danny Haines Company
4539 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 XXXX Haines Company
4545 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 SHIPLEY Paul D Haines Company
X ZERELDA Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 16
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4602 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 TSANG Esther Haines Company
4603 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 BANH Anita Haines Company
NGO Alexander D Haines Company
4607 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 VOLLRATH G Haines Company
4612 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 ROTH Ross T Haines Company
4613 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 SCHINTZ Lawrence L Haines Company
4616 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 STONECYPHER William Haines Company
4623 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 VUONG Tritia K Haines Company
4629 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 TO Quyen Yen Haines Company
4634 BARTLETT ST
Year Uses Source
1999 XXXX Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 17
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
BLUE CIR
8604 BLUE CIR
Year Uses Source
2015 BITANG HU Cole Information Services
2009 JOHNNY LU Cole Information Services
2004 JOHNNY LU Cole Information Services
1999 JOHNNY LU Cole Information Services
LU John 626 2 E Haines Company
1994 LU, JOHN Cole Information Services
1985 LU JOHN Pacific Bell
1980 LU JOHN BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 MARANAN CHAS Pacific Telephone
8605 BLUE CIR
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 CARPIO Rufino Haines Company
2004 RUFINO CARPIO Cole Information Services
1999 RUFINO CARPIO Cole Information Services
CARPIO Rufino Haines Company
8610 BLUE CIR
Year Uses Source
2015 WILSON LU Cole Information Services
2009 JUANITO REYNALDO Cole Information Services
2006 POSADA Nenlita Haines Company
o ARROYO Juanlto Haines Company
2004 JUANITO REYNALDO Cole Information Services
1999 JUANITO REYNALDO Cole Information Services
POSADA Nenita O Haines Company
1995 Posada Virgilio Pacific Bell
1994 POSADA, V Cole Information Services
1985 POSADA VIRGILIO Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 18
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1980 POSADA VIRGILIO BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 POSADA VIRGILIO ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
8611 BLUE CIR
Year Uses Source
2015 KEVIN LEE Cole Information Services
2009 KEVIN LEE Cole Information Services
2006 LEE Dixie 00 a Haines Company
2004 CLIFTON LEE Cole Information Services
1999 KEVIN LEE Cole Information Services
SOOHOO Tony S Haines Company
1975 MEDINA RAUL V Pacific Telephone
8616 BLUE CIR
Year Uses Source
2015 GARY NGAN Cole Information Services
2009 WAH NGAN Cole Information Services
2004 WAH NGAN Cole Information Services
1999 WAH NGAN Cole Information Services
NGAN Hon Wah Haines Company
NGAN Hon Wah Haines Company
1995 Ngan Hon Wah Pacific Bell
1994 NGAN, HON W Cole Information Services
1985 NGAN HON WAH Pacific Bell
1980 NGAN HON WAH BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 PAPA ERNESTO F Pacific Telephone
8617 BLUE CIR
Year Uses Source
2015 DAVID LO Cole Information Services
2009 DAVID LO Cole Information Services
2006 LO David Haines Company
1999 X WALNUT GROVE AV N Haines Company
HONG T M Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 19
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1999 DAVID LO Cole Information Services
1980 ALLEN DON & CARRIE BLUE CIR
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
ALLEN DON G BLUE CIR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
HALKETT AVE
4515 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 DOMINIC BARACCHINI Cole Information Services
2009 DOMINIC BARACCHINI Cole Information Services
2006 BARACCHINI Dominic Haines Company
2004 DOMINIC BARACCHINI Cole Information Services
1999 MARY CASIELLO Cole Information Services
DOMINIC BARACCHINI Cole Information Services
CASIELLO Mary Haines Company
4516 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 JAMES LIZAKOWSKI Cole Information Services
2009 JAMES LIZAKOWSKI Cole Information Services
2006 LIZAKOWSKI Jas A Haines Company
2004 JAMES LIZAKOWSKI Cole Information Services
1999 JAMES LIZAKOWSKI Cole Information Services
LIZAKOWSKI Jas A Haines Company
1995 Llzakowski Jas A Pacific Bell
4520 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1999 KUSAYANAGI George T Haines Company
LIBERTO Giuseppe Haines Company
4522 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 RUBEN ESCOBAL Cole Information Services
2009 RUBEN ESCOBAL Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 20
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2006 ESCOBALRuben Haines Company
2004 RUBEN ESCOBAL Cole Information Services
1999 RUBEN ESCOBAL Cole Information Services
ESCODAL Danasa Haines Company
4523 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 KEN LAM Cole Information Services
2009 KEN LAM Cole Information Services
2006 SOOJoo Haines Company
LUCJojo M Haines Company
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1999 KEN LAM Cole Information Services
GUERRERO Peggy S Haines Company
1985 MA KENNETH & JULIANA Pacific Bell
4526 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 NHU KHUU Cole Information Services
2009 NHU KHUU Cole Information Services
2006 KHUU Nhu Haines Company
2004 DANNY LY Cole Information Services
1999 NHU KHUU Cole Information Services
1994 LIBERTO, G Cole Information Services
4529 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 VAN KUSAYANAGI Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1985 KUSAYANAGI GEO Pacific Bell
4530 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1999 KHANH Tu K Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 21
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4532 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 ISABEL SEAGER Cole Information Services
2009 ISABEL SEAGER Cole Information Services
2006 SEAGERAMeene Haines Company
1999 X TURPIN Haines Company
VICTORIAN Raymond Haines Company
ISABEL SEAGER Cole Information Services
1994 CITY LAWN SVC & LANDSCAPE Cole Information Services
1985 CITY LAWN SERVICE Pacific Bell
4536 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 SHING YIU Cole Information Services
2009 SHING YIU Cole Information Services
2006 a KHANH Tu Haines Company
2004 SHING YIU Cole Information Services
1999 SHING YIU Cole Information Services
1985 MARANAN MARVIN M Pacific Bell
4542 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 FREDDY ZELADA Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 O DIZON Jason Haines Company
2004 CANCHOLA TRUCKING Cole Information Services
JASON DIZON Cole Information Services
1999 DIZON Jason K Haines Company
1995 I Gutlerrez Alberto Pacific Bell
1994 GUTIERREZ, ALBERTO Cole Information Services
1986 LEE HYUN KUN ROSEMEAD Pacific Bell
1985 LEE HYUN KUN Pacific Bell
1981 LEE HYUN KUN ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 22
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4548 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 KELLY BUI Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 LAM Lisa Haines Company
2004 HANG LAM Cole Information Services
1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
4552 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 ANGELINA JOHNSON Cole Information Services
2006 No Current Listing Haines Company
2004 ANGELINA JOHNSON Cole Information Services
1999 ANGELINA JOHNSON Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
4558 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 STEVEN PHAM Cole Information Services
2009 DAVID CARRANZA Cole Information Services
2006 CARRANZA David Haines Company
2004 DAVID CARRANZA Cole Information Services
1999 PANG Shu Pui Haines Company
1995 Pang Shu Pu I Pacific Bell
1994 PANG, SHU P Cole Information Services
4561 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 DENNIS HOKAMA Cole Information Services
2009 DENNIS HOKAMA Cole Information Services
2006 HOKAMA Dennis Haines Company
2004 DENNIS HOKAMA Cole Information Services
1999 DENNIS HOKAMA Cole Information Services
X MISSION DR Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 23
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1999 HOKAMA Dennis Haines Company
1995 Hokama Dennis Pacific Bell
1994 HOKAMA, DENNIS Cole Information Services
1985 HOKAMA DENNIS Pacific Bell
4598 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1999 XXXX Haines Company
4641 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1999 HONG Byron Haines Company
4654 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1999 KARLEN Nora Haines Company
4671 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1999 XXXX Haines Company
4676 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1999 PHUN Mui Moc Haines Company
X GRAND AV Haines Company
4702 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 ADRIANE HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services
2009 ANTON HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services
2006 No Current Listing Haines Company
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1999 ANTON HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services
XXXX Haines Company
1957 AMIDAN FRANK A Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 24
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4703 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 VO HUYNH Cole Information Services
2009 VO HUYNH Cole Information Services
2006 JURADOArnanda Haines Company
2004 GILBERT MENDEZ Cole Information Services
1999 VO HUYNH Cole Information Services
MENDEZ Gilbert T Haines Company
1995 Mender Gilbert T Pacific Bell
1994 MENDEZ, GILBERT T Cole Information Services
1985 MENDEZ GILBERT T Pacific Bell
1980 MENDEZ GILBERT T HALKETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4706 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 ROSS OLIVA Cole Information Services
2009 HUAN TRAN Cole Information Services
2006 NIEQIn Haines Company
2004 NHON CHEN Cole Information Services
1999 HUAN TRAN Cole Information Services
ZHU Wenhong Haines Company
1994 HAO, YEN W Cole Information Services
1980 CONOVER GARY HALKETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4712 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 MERENDA JOS H HALKETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4713 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 CARLILE GEO HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 25
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4724 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 RIVERA RUTILLA HALKETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4725 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 BONE VERNIE E HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4728 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 FULLER W J HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4729 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 FEASE MAE HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4735 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 FROSCHAUER DAVID L & JEANNE
HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4741 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1995 Daniels Chas R Pacific Bell
1980 DANIELS CHAS R HALKETT AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4745 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 TYLER L HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4754 HALKETT AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 DAVID SOLO HALKETT AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 26
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
LA PRESA AVE
4432 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
1980 SCHULTZ MYRON LA PRESA AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4436 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 JUANITA CONTRERAS Cole Information Services
2009 JUANITA CONTRERAS Cole Information Services
2004 JUANITA CONTRERAS Cole Information Services
1999 JUANITA CONTRERAS Cole Information Services
4437 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 SHAO WEN Cole Information Services
2009 FERN GOMES Cole Information Services
2004 FERN GOMES Cole Information Services
1999 FERN GOMES Cole Information Services
4440 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 MICHAEL LORUSSO Cole Information Services
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1985 CARWILE SCOTT Pacific Bell
4443 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 STEVEN ESSEX Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2004 WESLEY ESSEX Cole Information Services
1999 ESSEX Wesley A Haines Company
1994 ESSEX, WESLEY A Cole Information Services
1985 ESSEX WESLEY A Pacific Bell
1980 ESSEX WESLEY A LA PRESA AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 27
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4446 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 GARY TALLMAN Cole Information Services
2009 PEGGY SHAHENIAN Cole Information Services
2004 PEGGY SHAHENIAN Cole Information Services
1999 PEGGY SHAHENIAN Cole Information Services
SHAHENIAN Edward B Haines Company
1995 Shahid Albert Pacific Bell
Shahenian Edw B Pacific Bell
1994 SHAHENIAN, EDWARD B Cole Information Services
1985 SHAHENIAN P L Pacific Bell
SHAHENIAN EDW B Pacific Bell
1980 SHAHENIAN EDW B LA PRESA AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4447 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 RICHARD WONG Cole Information Services
2009 JEFFREY WONG Cole Information Services
2004 RICHARD WONG Cole Information Services
1999 JEFFREY WONG Cole Information Services
HARER Ray M Haines Company
1995 Harer Ray M Pacific Bell
1994 HARER, RAY M Cole Information Services
1985 HARER RAY M Pacific Bell
1980 HARER RAY M LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4450 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 TOYOSHI NAKAI Cole Information Services
2009 TOYOSHI NAKAI Cole Information Services
2004 TOYOSHI NAKAI Cole Information Services
1999 TOYOSHI NAKAI Cole Information Services
NAKAI Toyoshi Haines Company
1995 I Nakal Toyoshl Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 28
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1995 i Nakal Yasuhiro Pacific Bell
1994 NAKAI, TOYOSHI Cole Information Services
1985 NAKAI TOYOSHI ROSEMEAD Pacific Bell
1980 NAKAI HARUMI LA PRESA AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
NAKAI TOYOSHI LA PRESA AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4453 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 JEFF CORTEZ Cole Information Services
2009 FRANCISCO CORTES Cole Information Services
2004 FRANCISCO CORTES Cole Information Services
1999 FRANCISCO CORTES Cole Information Services
4456 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 CEDRIC CATERIO Cole Information Services
2009 CEDRIC CATERIO Cole Information Services
2004 CEDRIC CATERIO Cole Information Services
1985 MILNER JAY Pacific Bell
1980 MILNER JAY LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4457 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 DANIEL WASHBURN Cole Information Services
2009 DANIEL WASHBURN Cole Information Services
2004 SAI LAM Cole Information Services
1999 DANIEL WASHBURN Cole Information Services
NUMBERS Wayne F Haines Company
1995 Numbers Wayne O Pacific Bell
1994 NUMBERS, WAYNE D Cole Information Services
1985 NUMBERS WAYNE D Pacific Bell
1980 NUMBERS WAYNE D LA PRESA AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 29
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4461 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 CALEB HALL Cole Information Services
2009 LIANG HALL Cole Information Services
2004 LIANG HALL Cole Information Services
1999 LIANG HALL Cole Information Services
X ZERELDA Haines Company
HALL Liang Haines Company
1995 Hall iang Pacific Bell
1994 HALL, LIANG Cole Information Services
1980 BENESH ROBT M LA PRESA AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4462 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 ARTURO VALDEZ Cole Information Services
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1999 ARTURO VALDEZ Cole Information Services
1985 BUENO R S Pacific Bell
1980 BUENO R S LA PRESA AVE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
4465 LA PRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 HTUN THUREIN Cole Information Services
2009 NORMAN LIM Cole Information Services
2004 NORMAN LIM Cole Information Services
1999 NORMAN LIM Cole Information Services
1985 BARKER L B Pacific Bell
1980 BARKER JOHN M LA PRESA AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 30
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
LAPRESA AVE
4436 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 0 CONTRERAS Juanita Haines Company
4437 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 0 GOMES Richard Haines Company
4440 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 No Current Listing Haines Company
4443 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 ESSEXWesley Haines Company
4446 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 SHAHENIAN P Haines Company
o SHAHENIANL Haines Company
4447 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 o WONG Richard S Haines Company
4450 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 o NAKAI Toyoshl Haines Company
4453 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 o CORTEZ Francisco Haines Company
4456 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 o CATERIO Cedric Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 31
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4457 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 CHOUSam Haines Company
WASHBURN Daniel Haines Company
4461 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 HALLLlang Haines Company
LIM Robert Haines Company
4462 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 TELLECHEAGeorgina Haines Company
4465 LAPRESA AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 o LIM Robertd Haines Company
MISSION DR
8504 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 FRANK LIMON Cole Information Services
2009 FRANK LIMON Cole Information Services
2006 LIMON Carolyn Haines Company
2004 FRANK LIMON Cole Information Services
1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
FRANK LIMON Cole Information Services
8512 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 ASHWIN LUHAR Cole Information Services
2009 ASHWIN LUHAR Cole Information Services
2006 LUHARAshwin Haines Company
2004 ASHWIN LUHAR Cole Information Services
1999 ASHWIN LUHAR Cole Information Services
1985 FLEETWOOD DRIVE AWAY Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 32
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
8516 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 e LEEManryann Haines Company
2004 MARRYANN LEE Cole Information Services
1995 DIEP ANH-LE Pacific Bell
Diep Anh Le Pacific Bell
Diep B BPk Pacific Bell
1994 DIEP, ANHLE Cole Information Services
8520 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 JIN LEW Cole Information Services
2009 HO LEW Cole Information Services
2006 LEWJin Ho Haines Company
2004 JIN LEW Cole Information Services
1999 HO LEW Cole Information Services
1995 LEW JIN HO Pacific Bell
1994 LEW, JIN H Cole Information Services
1985 LEW LILY Pacific Bell
LEW JIN HO Pacific Bell
1975 SONG KEITH Pacific Telephone
8526 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 CHENG LIU Cole Information Services
2009 CHENG LIU Cole Information Services
2006 LIUCH Haines Company
2004 MICHAEL LIU Cole Information Services
1999 CHENG LIU Cole Information Services
1995 Liu C H Pacific Bell
Liu CM Whit Pacific Bell
Liue C Pacific Bell
LIU C H Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 33
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1994 LIU, CLAIRE H Cole Information Services
1985 LIU PHILIP CHENG-HSING Pacific Bell
1975 PLONOWSKI HENRY A Pacific Telephone
8541 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 ANTHONY LESLIE Cole Information Services
2009 EVERTON LESLIE Cole Information Services
2006 LESLIE Rachel Haines Company
2004 RACHEL LESLIE Cole Information Services
1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
EVERTON LESLIE Cole Information Services
1975 TAYLOR TIMOTHY Pacific Telephone
1960 COCHRAN PEGGY S Pacific Telephone
1957 EVANS R L Pacific Telephone
8544 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 NHAT NGUYEN Cole Information Services
2009 NHI VO Cole Information Services
2006 VO Nhuan Haines Company
NHUAN Duo Haines Company
2004 JOSE VERGARA Cole Information Services
1999 NHI VO Cole Information Services
1995 Patel Usha Natu Pacific Bell
Patel VK Pacific Bell
PATEL USHA NATU Pacific Bell
1994 PATEL, USHA N Cole Information Services
1985 PATEL USHA NATU Pacific Bell
1980 PATEL USHA NATU MISSION DR
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 PATEL NATU B Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 34
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
8547 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 FEDERICO SOLIS Cole Information Services
2009 ALDO SOLIS Cole Information Services
2006 SOLIS Federico Haines Company
2004 FEDERICO SOLIS Cole Information Services
1999 ALDO SOLIS Cole Information Services
1995 SOLIS FEDERICO Pacific Bell
Solis Federico Pacific Bell
Soils Francisco J Pacific Bell
Solis Freddy & Rosa Azu Pacific Bell
Solis Gayle & Ruben Jr Pacific Bell
1985 SOLIS FEDERICO Pacific Bell
1957 STARR VEDA Pacific Telephone
8610 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 ANTONIO MORALES Cole Information Services
2009 ANTONIO MORALES Cole Information Services
2006 MORALESAntonio Haines Company
2004 ANTONIO MORALES Cole Information Services
1999 ANTONIO MORALES Cole Information Services
1966 RICHARDS S ORA Pacific Telephone
1960 RICHARDS ORA Pacific Telephone
8618 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Cole Information Services
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH Cole Information Services
2009 BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Cole Information Services
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD Cole Information Services
2006 FIRST BAPT CH Haines Company
BEREAN CHRISTIAN Haines Company
2004 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 35
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1999 BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Cole Information Services
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD Cole Information Services
1995 BE RE AN CHRIS TIAN S CHOOL Pacific Bell
BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Pacific Bell
1994 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ROSEMEAD Cole Information Services
BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Cole Information Services
1986 A B C CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER Pacific Bell
1985 IGLESIA BAUTISTA HISPANA DE CRISTO Pacific Bell
HEAD START ABC CHILD DEVELOPMENT
CENTER
Pacific Bell
FIRST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD THE Pacific Bell
ALHAMBRA AREA CHURCH COUNCIL INC Pacific Bell
A B C CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER MAIN
OFFICE
Pacific Bell
1981 A B C CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER Pacific Telephone
1980 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD
THE MISSION DR ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD
THE
Pacific Telephone
SMALL WORLD CHRISTIAN PRE-SCHOOL Pacific Telephone
8623 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
1985 SCHWEBACH FRANK N Pacific Bell
1980 SCHWEBACH FRANK N MISSION DR
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 SCHWEBACH FRANK N Pacific Telephone
8625 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 WAYNE DUBOIS Cole Information Services
8630 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services
2009 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 36
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2006 TRANCuong Haines Company
2004 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services
1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services
1980 BENNETT LAUREL MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1966 NELSON ARTHUR C Pacific Telephone
8632 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 SUPING WU Cole Information Services
2009 BENNETT STEVENN STEVENNS
GARDENING
Cole Information Services
THOMAS BENNETT Cole Information Services
2006 BENETTS 6avenn Haines Company
2004 THOMAS BENNETT Cole Information Services
1999 THOMAS BENNETT Cole Information Services
1994 SEMKOWICZ, LEONARD F Cole Information Services
1985 SEMKOWICZ LEONARD F Pacific Bell
1980 SEMKOWICZ LEONARD F MISSION DR
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 SEMKOWICZ LEONARD F Pacific Telephone
1966 SEMKOWICZ LEONARD F Pacific Telephone
8634 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 VU NGUYEN Cole Information Services
2009 KHON NGUYEN Cole Information Services
2006 NGUYENK Haines Company
2004 KHON NGUYEN Cole Information Services
1999 KHON NGUYEN Cole Information Services
1985 STAFFORD JOS A Pacific Bell
1980 STAFFORD JOS A MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 STAFFORD JOS A Pacific Telephone
1966 STAFFORD VICTORIA Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 37
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
8635 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2009 BIG BLUE HOUSE PUBLISHING CO Cole Information Services
2006 BIG BLUE HSE Haines Company
PUBUSHING CO DUBOIS D Haines Company
2004 WAYNE DUBOIS Cole Information Services
BIG BLUE HOUSE PUBLISHING CO Cole Information Services
1995 Du bois Wayne A Pacific Bell
Du Bols Patrick Pacific Bell
DU BOIS WAYNE A Pacific Bell
1994 DUBOIS, WAYNE A Cole Information Services
1985 DUBOIS WAYNE A Pacific Bell
1966 BRADY HUGH C Pacific Telephone
BRADY HUGH C RL EST APPRSR Pacific Telephone
1960 BRADY HUGH C RL EST APPRSR Pacific Telephone
1957 BRADY HUGH C RL EST APPR Pacific Telephone
8636 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 TIGER TU Cole Information Services
2009 DENNIS ORGOVAN Cole Information Services
2006 ORGOVANJ Haines Company
2004 ROBERT MAXWELL Cole Information Services
1999 DENNIS ORGOVAN Cole Information Services
ROBERT MAXWELL Cole Information Services
1994 MAXWELL, ROBERT L Cole Information Services
1985 MAXWELL ROBT L Pacific Bell
1975 MAXWELL ROBT L Pacific Telephone
1966 MAXWELL R L Pacific Telephone
1960 JACKMAN R R Pacific Telephone
1957 JACKMAN R R R Pacific Telephone
8637 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 LINH LUU Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 38
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2009 JACKIE LY Cole Information Services
2006 No Current Listing Haines Company
2004 MELYNDA HONG Cole Information Services
1999 JACKIE LY Cole Information Services
1995 i Huynh Johnny Pacific Bell
Huynh John Pacific Bell
1985 LEE KENNETH Pacific Bell
1980 AGUIRRE LUIS G MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 AGUIRRE L G Pacific Telephone
1966 PAPINEAU FRANCIS Pacific Telephone
8639 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 TIEN HO Cole Information Services
2009 TIEN HO Cole Information Services
2004 KWAN HO Cole Information Services
1999 TIEN HO Cole Information Services
1966 OWEN ROBT Pacific Telephone
8644 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 HANSON LAM Cole Information Services
2009 HSING HO Cole Information Services
2006 GIANG Thanh Haines Company
HO Al Jexander Haines Company
LIANGShiyuan Haines Company
1999 HSING HO Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1985 GUIA MIRTA Pacific Bell
1980 HERRERA DAVE R MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1960 FORESTER ETHELMAE Pacific Telephone
1957 FORESTER HAROLD Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 39
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
8645 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 NGOR SOKARA Cole Information Services
2009 SI TAN Cole Information Services
2006 PUY Chan Haines Company
LUOYu Yan Haines Company
2004 YU LUO Cole Information Services
1999 SI TAN Cole Information Services
1985 OLLIVIER E Pacific Bell
1980 OLLIVIER E MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 OLLIVIER E Pacific Telephone
8650 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 YONG WONG Cole Information Services
2009 YONG WONG Cole Information Services
2006 WONGChing L Haines Company
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1999 YONG WONG Cole Information Services
1980 GONZALES P MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1966 THAYER ELMER L Pacific Telephone
1960 THAYER ELMER L Pacific Telephone
1957 THAYER ELMER L R Pacific Telephone
8651 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 RODREGUIZMartha Haines Company
2004 VIDALINA MALDONADO Cole Information Services
1999 JULIO RODRIGUEZ Cole Information Services
8654 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
1957 HARLAN LOIS Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 40
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
8655 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 ELEFF R Haines Company
2004 RUDY ELEFF Cole Information Services
1995 I Eleff R A Pacific Bell
ELEFFR A Pacific Bell
1994 ELEFF, RUDOLPH A Cole Information Services
1985 ELEFF R A Pacific Bell
1980 ELEFF R A MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 ELEFF R A Pacific Telephone
1966 ELEFF A Pacific Telephone
1960 ELEFF A Pacific Telephone
1957 ELEFF A Pacific Telephone
8658 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 PEDRO MONTENEGRO Cole Information Services
2009 MONTENEGRO & PARTNERS INC Cole Information Services
SILVIA MONTENEGRO Cole Information Services
2006 MONTENEGRO Pedro Haines Company
2004 SILVIA MONTONEGRO Cole Information Services
MONTENEGRO & PARTNERS INC Cole Information Services
1999 SILVIA MONTENEGRO Cole Information Services
MONTENEGRO & PARTNERS Cole Information Services
1980 VANDERCOOK D L MISSION DR
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
O SHEA T MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 MESSENGER CONLEY L Pacific Telephone
1966 DURAN JACOB H Pacific Telephone
1960 SKUPIEN STANLEY A Pacific Telephone
1957 SKUPIEN STANLEY A Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 41
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
8701 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 CHRIS DREW Cole Information Services
2004 CHRIS DREW Cole Information Services
1999 CHRIS DREW Cole Information Services
1985 LEE JIM R ROSEMEAD Pacific Bell
1980 LEE MARK JAMES MISSION DR ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1975 LEE GARY Pacific Telephone
1957 ZWICK RAOUL Pacific Telephone
8702 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 CALDERON Jesus Haines Company
1999 JAIME CALDERON Cole Information Services
1980 CALDERON JESUS MISSION DR
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 CALDERON JESUS Pacific Telephone
1966 JOHNSON ROY L Pacific Telephone
JOHNSON JERRY Pacific Telephone
1960 MORENO LEE V Pacific Telephone
1957 MORENO LEE V Pacific Telephone
8703 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
2015 TOSHI SAKAUYE Cole Information Services
2009 TOSHI SAKAUYE Cole Information Services
2006 SAKAUYEMinonu Haines Company
2004 TOSHI SAKAUYE Cole Information Services
1995 SAKAEUYE MINORE Pacific Bell
1994 SAKAUYE, MINORU Cole Information Services
1985 SAKAUYE MINORU Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 42
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1980 SAKAUYE MINORU MISSION DR
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1957 CAMASTA JOS R Pacific Telephone
8710 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
1960 BIGELOW J DAVID REV ROSEMEAD FOUR
SQUARE CHURCH
Pacific Telephone
1957 CRON JAS R REV Pacific Telephone
8714 MISSION DR
Year Uses Source
1980 FOURSQUARE CHURCH OF ROSEMEAD
MISSION DR ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
ROSEMEAD FOURSQUARE CHURCH
MISSION DR ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
WALNUT GROVE AVE
4465 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 FAN TSENG Cole Information Services
2009 FAN TSENG Cole Information Services
2006 o HUNGYuh 00 E Haines Company
2004 FAN TSENG Cole Information Services
1999 FAN TSENG Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1985 TZENG ROBERT F Pacific Bell
4469 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 KEIKO MISUMI Cole Information Services
2009 KEIKO MISUMI Cole Information Services
2006 MISUMI Etsuko Haines Company
2004 KEIKO MISUMI Cole Information Services
1999 KEIKO MISUMI Cole Information Services
1995 Misumi Etsuko Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 43
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1985 OTAGIRI MASAHISA Pacific Bell
4473 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 ANNA SAM Cole Information Services
2009 RAY LEE Cole Information Services
2006 LEE Eun 00 S Haines Company
2004 EUN LEE Cole Information Services
HWAN EUN Cole Information Services
1999 RAY LEE Cole Information Services
4477 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 ELIZABETH ENG Cole Information Services
2006 ENG Elizabeth Haines Company
2004 Q LIDONNA Cole Information Services
FONG GUI Cole Information Services
DONNA LI Cole Information Services
1999 ELIZABETH ENG Cole Information Services
1985 MUH JACKSON WEN-MUGI Pacific Bell
4481 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 FU MING Cole Information Services
2009 MING LI Cole Information Services
2006 MING Fu Haines Company
2004 YI CHENG Cole Information Services
FU MING Cole Information Services
MING LI Cole Information Services
HSIU HSIAO Cole Information Services
1999 MING LI Cole Information Services
1995 Amorelli Joseph Pacific Bell
1994 AMORELLI, JOSEPH Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 44
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1985 AMORELLI JOSEPH Pacific Bell
4485 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 P DANH Cole Information Services
ANDY LEE Cole Information Services
ZHENG KENNEDY Cole Information Services
2006 KENNEDY Min Haines Company
MENG Zhe Haines Company
2004 TONG PAN Cole Information Services
YU LI Cole Information Services
KAI CHEN Cole Information Services
CHANG YAO Cole Information Services
1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
P DANH Cole Information Services
ZHENG KENNEDY Cole Information Services
ANDY LEE Cole Information Services
1995 Chien Loh Ping Pacific Bell
1994 CHIEN, LOHPING Cole Information Services
1985 CHIEN LOH PING Pacific Bell
4489 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 ANITA LOW Cole Information Services
2009 ANITA LOW Cole Information Services
2006 LOW Freda Haines Company
2004 ANITA LOW Cole Information Services
1999 ANITA LOW Cole Information Services
4493 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 JEROD WARNEY Cole Information Services
2009 NOBUYOSHI KURASAKO Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 45
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2006 Nobuyosh I Haines Company
KURASAKO Haines Company
2004 NOBUYOSHI KURASAKO Cole Information Services
1999 NOBUYOSHI KURASAKO Cole Information Services
1995 Kurasako Nobuyoshi Pacific Bell
Kuerata Fred S Pacific Bell
1994 KURASAKO, N Cole Information Services
4497 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 TSAI CHEN Cole Information Services
2009 TSAI CHEN Cole Information Services
2006 WALNUTGRV Haines Company
CHEN Tsal Haines Company
TOWNHOME Haines Company
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1999 TSAI CHEN Cole Information Services
WALNUT GROVE TOWNHOMES
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Cole Information Services
1995 Walnut Grove Townhomes Homeowners
Assn
Pacific Bell
1994 WALNUT GRV TOWNHOME Cole Information Services
4503 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 MARGARITA HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services
EMILY KING Cole Information Services
IAN BLACKWELL Cole Information Services
TERESITA RUIZ Cole Information Services
2009 LOR WENDY Cole Information Services
SAID DAHOMA Cole Information Services
OMAR BARRIOS Cole Information Services
EMILY KING Cole Information Services
JOSE DAYAO Cole Information Services
2006 RUIZ David Haines Company
6684447-5 Page 46
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2006 MORALES Rober Haines Company
ASTENGO Hary Haines Company
LIEUChee Haines Company
2004 LIBRADO SAAVEDRA Cole Information Services
XIAO DU Cole Information Services
BERTHA CUEVAS Cole Information Services
HARRY ASTENGO Cole Information Services
CHEE LIEU Cole Information Services
JANINE GUBA Cole Information Services
1999 SHEILA RODARTE Cole Information Services
OMAR BARRIOS Cole Information Services
SAID DAHOMA Cole Information Services
JOSE DAYAO Cole Information Services
LOR WENDY Cole Information Services
EMILY KING Cole Information Services
1994 HUYNH, NU Cole Information Services
1975 HILL ORVILL W Pacific Telephone
1966 HILL ORVILL W Pacific Telephone
1960 MC NIEL PATRICK M Pacific Telephone
1957 MCNIEL PATRICK M Pacific Telephone
4506 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
1960 WHISEANT HARREL Pacific Telephone
1957 MCMILLAN HERBERT J R Pacific Telephone
4509 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 VALERIE BASQUETTE Cole Information Services
2006 MCNEILRF Haines Company
2004 R MCNEIL Cole Information Services
1995 Mc Niel R F Pacific Bell
1994 MCNIEL, RAYMOND F Cole Information Services
1985 MC NIEL R F Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 47
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1980 MCNIEL R F WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 MCNIEL R F Pacific Telephone
1966 MCNIEL R F Pacific Telephone
1960 MC NIEL R F Pacific Telephone
1957 MCNIEL R F R Pacific Telephone
4512 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
1966 HEATH ROBT D SR Pacific Telephone
1957 HEATH ROBT D SR Pacific Telephone
4515 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 RONALD VALENTINE Cole Information Services
2006 LEHMANN Louis J Haines Company
VALENTINE Janet 00 S Haines Company
1999 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1995 Lehmann Louis J Pacific Bell
1985 LEHMANN LOUIS J Pacific Bell
1980 LEHMANN LOUIS J WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 LEHMANN LOUIS J Pacific Telephone
1966 LEHMANN LOUIS J Pacific Telephone
1960 LEHMANN LOUIS J Pacific Telephone
1957 LEHMANN JACK R Pacific Telephone
4520 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 MUNRO KREINIK Cole Information Services
2009 MUNRO KREINIK Cole Information Services
2006 KREINIK Munro Haines Company
2004 MUNRO KREINIK Cole Information Services
1999 MUNRO KREINIK Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 48
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4521 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 ISAMU WATANABE Cole Information Services
2009 ISAMU WATANABE Cole Information Services
2006 WATANABEIsamu Haines Company
2004 WATANABE NURSERY Cole Information Services
ISAMU WATANABE Cole Information Services
1999 ISAMU WATANABE Cole Information Services
1995 Watanabe Isamu Pacific Bell
Wafanabe J LH Pacific Bell
1994 WATANABE, ISAMU Cole Information Services
1985 WATANABE ISAMU Pacific Bell
WATANABE ISAMU Pacific Bell
1980 WATANABE ISAMU WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 WATANABE ISAMU Pacific Telephone
1966 HOLMAN KYLE T Pacific Telephone
1960 HOLMAN KYLE T Pacific Telephone
4524 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
1985 JACKSON WALTER REV Pacific Bell
1980 DE MACIAS ANTHONY WALNUT GROVE
AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
4527 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2009 EMILIANO CORLETO Cole Information Services
2006 CORLETO Margarita Haines Company
2004 EMILIANO CORLETO Cole Information Services
1999 EMILIANO CORLETO Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1985 HOLMAN M A Pacific Bell
1980 HOLMAN M A WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 HOLMAN M A Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 49
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1966 HOLMAN M A MRS Pacific Telephone
1960 HOLMAN M A MRS Pacific Telephone
1957 HOLMAN M A MRS Pacific Telephone
4530 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2006 ASHLEY J Haines Company
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1980 MARTIN MAXWELL WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1966 MARTER GARY N Pacific Telephone
1957 SPIARS W H Pacific Telephone
4533 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 JIAN CHEN Cole Information Services
2009 CHUE CHING Cole Information Services
2006 CHUE Ching Haines Company
CHING Chue Man Haines Company
2004 CHUE CHING Cole Information Services
1999 CHUE CHING Cole Information Services
1975 ANTHONY HILBERT H Pacific Telephone
1960 SMITH FRED C Pacific Telephone
4534 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
1985 DE MACIAS ANTHONY Pacific Bell
1980 WAGNER RICHARD A WALNUT GROVE
AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 WAGNER RICHARD A Pacific Telephone
1960 BLUNT EDNA A Pacific Telephone
1957 BLUNT EDNA A R Pacific Telephone
4539 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 KEJIAN CHEN Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 50
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2009 KEJIAN CHEN Cole Information Services
2006 KE Jian Haines Company
CHEN Kejlan Haines Company
2004 KEJIAN CHEN Cole Information Services
1999 KEJIAN CHEN Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1994 RIVAS, HILARIA Cole Information Services
1985 VIQUEZ ROBERTO Pacific Bell
1960 FISHER FRANK MRS Pacific Telephone
FISHER FRANK MRS Pacific Telephone
1957 FISHER FRANK MRS Pacific Telephone
4542 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 THI TRINH Cole Information Services
WOON LUI Cole Information Services
2009 SUEN WOON Cole Information Services
WOON LUI Cole Information Services
2006 WOON Suen Haines Company
TRINHHon Haines Company
2004 SHU LIN Cole Information Services
1999 WOON LUI Cole Information Services
SUEN WOON Cole Information Services
1994 ESTRADA, E J Cole Information Services
HERNANDEZ, HECTOR Cole Information Services
1985 GUTIERREZ ALBERTO Pacific Bell
SANCHEZ CONCRETE WORKS Pacific Bell
1980 GUTIERREZ ALBERTO WALNUT GROVE
AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 BULLIS ROY E Pacific Telephone
1966 BULLIS G H MRS Pacific Telephone
1960 BULLIS ROY H Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 51
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4546 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 RAFAEL ARELLANO Cole Information Services
2009 RAFAEL ARELLANO Cole Information Services
2006 ARELLANORafael Haines Company
2004 FELIPE HERNANDEZ Cole Information Services
1999 RAFAEL ARELLANO Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1980 WARLOCK ROBT WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 WARLOCK ROBT Pacific Telephone
1966 WARLICK ROBT Pacific Telephone
4552 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 RALPH ARELLANO Cole Information Services
2009 RALPH ARELLANO Cole Information Services
2006 ARELLANO Ralph Haines Company
2004 RAFAEL ARELLANO Cole Information Services
YOLANDA MARTINEZ Cole Information Services
1999 RALPH ARELLANO Cole Information Services
1995 Arellano Ralph Pacific Bell
1994 ARELLANO, RALPH Cole Information Services
1980 CHAPIN ROBT O WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 CHAPIN ROBT D Pacific Telephone
1960 BLUM GERALDINE ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1957 NELSON BRUCE MRS Pacific Telephone
4703 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 PAUL HORN Cole Information Services
2009 TOP DANCE SHOES INC Cole Information Services
REI INTERNATIONAL INC Cole Information Services
PAUL HORN Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 52
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1999 PAUL HORN Cole Information Services
1985 HARTONOVYCH PETER Pacific Bell
1980 HARTONOVYCH PETER WALNUT GROVE
AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 HARTONOVYCH PETER Pacific Telephone
4709 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 DONABELLE HOPP Cole Information Services
2009 DONABELLE HOPP Cole Information Services
2006 HOPPMercell Haines Company
2004 DONABELLE HOPP Cole Information Services
1999 DONABELLE HOPP Cole Information Services
1994 HOPP, MERCEIL J Cole Information Services
1985 HOPP M J Pacific Bell
1981 CARTER WILLIS L ROSEMEAD Pacific Telephone
1980 CARTER WILLIS L WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1976 Carter Willis L Pacific Telephone
1975 CARTER WILLIS L Pacific Telephone
1971 Carter Willis L Pacific Telephone
4715 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 LUCIO GOMEZ Cole Information Services
2009 LUCIO PEREZ Cole Information Services
2006 RUVALCABA Zenaido Haines Company
GOMEZAdam Haines Company
2004 ADAM GOMEZ Cole Information Services
1999 TONG HA Cole Information Services
LUCIO PEREZ Cole Information Services
6684447-5 Page 53
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4716 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 LINDA KILPATRICK Cole Information Services
2009 LINDA KILPATRICK Cole Information Services
2004 LINDA KILPATRICK Cole Information Services
1999 LINDA KILPATRICK Cole Information Services
1975 KILPATRICK BILL Pacific Telephone
1966 WADDLE WALTER L Pacific Telephone
4720 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 KEVIN MERENDA Cole Information Services
2009 MARY MERENDA Cole Information Services
2006 MERENDAMary Haines Company
1999 MARY MERENDA Cole Information Services
OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1966 BACON JAS L Pacific Telephone
1960 MAURER JOHN Pacific Telephone
4723 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 LENH PHAM Cole Information Services
2009 RICARDO GARCIA Cole Information Services
2006 GARCIA Ricardo Haines Company
2004 RICARDO GARCIA Cole Information Services
1999 RICARDO GARCIA Cole Information Services
1995 Garcia Ricardo Jr Pacific Bell
1975 ROSATO JERRY Pacific Telephone
1966 RODRIGUEZ RITA M Pacific Telephone
RODRIGUEZ RENE G Pacific Telephone
1960 FELLOWS MARJORIE B Pacific Telephone
1957 FELLOWS MARJORIE B R Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 54
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4726 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2009 ROBERT HINOSTRO Cole Information Services
2004 ROBERT HINOSTRO Cole Information Services
1999 ROBERT HINOSTRO Cole Information Services
1995 Lamb Peter Pacific Bell
Lamb R Mon Pacific Bell
Lamb Paul E Pacific Bell
1994 LAMB, PAUL E Cole Information Services
1985 LAMB PAUL E Pacific Bell
1980 LAMB PAUL E WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 LAMB PAUL E Pacific Telephone
1960 TRYONOVIECH FRANK J Pacific Telephone
4729 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 JIM RICKMAN Cole Information Services
GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Cole Information Services
2004 GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Cole Information Services
JIM RICKMAN Cole Information Services
1999 GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Cole Information Services
1995 Rickman Jim Pacific Bell
Green Earth Landscaping Pacific Bell
1985 RICKMAN JIM Pacific Bell
RICKMAN JIM Pacific Bell
RICKMAN BARBARA Pacific Bell
GREEN EARTH LANDSCAPING Pacific Bell
1980 RICKMAN JIM WALNUT GROVE AVE
ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 PORTER ERROL E Pacific Telephone
1957 BECKSTEAD D O Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 55
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
4732 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 YOLANDA PADILLA Cole Information Services
2009 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
2006 PADILLA AIfredo Haines Company
2004 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN Cole Information Services
1966 DELGADILLO RICHARD S Pacific Telephone
1960 DELGADILLO RICHARD S Pacific Telephone
1957 DELGADILLO RICHARD S Pacific Telephone
4740 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
2015 BENSON TRAN Cole Information Services
2009 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services
2006 TRAN Cuong Quan Haines Company
CUONG Quan Haines Company
2004 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services
1999 CUONG TRAN Cole Information Services
1995 Buranen Amy Pacific Bell
Buranday Leonardo P Pacific Bell
1994 BURANDAY, L P Cole Information Services
1985 BURANDAY LEONARDO P Pacific Bell
1980 BURANDAY LEONARDO P WALNUT
GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
1975 GLISSON TERRY H Pacific Telephone
1966 NOLIN GEO H Pacific Telephone
NOLIN ROSE MARIE Pacific Telephone
1957 PATERSON THOS Pacific Telephone
4533 1/2 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
1966 HOGSTON WAITER Pacific Telephone
4542 1/2 WALNUT GROVE AVE
Year Uses Source
1985 PRECIADO SANTIAGO P Pacific Bell
6684447-5 Page 56
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
1980 PRECIADO SANTIAGO P WALNUT GROVE
AVE ROSEMEAD
Pacific Telephone
6684447-5 Page 57
FINDINGS
ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE
The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not
identified in research source.
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4432 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4436 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4436 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4437 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4437 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4440 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4440 LA PRESA AVE 2009, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4440 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4443 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4443 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4443 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4446 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4446 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4446 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4447 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4447 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4447 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4450 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4450 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4450 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4453 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4453 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4456 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4456 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4456 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4457 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4457 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4457 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4461 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4461 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4461 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4462 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4462 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4462 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4465 LA PRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4465 LA PRESA AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4465 LAPRESA AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4465 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4465 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4469 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4469 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4471 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4471 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4473 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4473 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4477 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4477 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4481 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4481 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4485 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4485 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4489 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4489 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4493 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4493 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4497 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4497 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4503 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4503 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4506 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966,
1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4509 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958,
1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942,
1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928,
1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4509 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2009, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4512 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4512 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4512 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4512 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4515 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4515 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4515 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4515 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958,
1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942,
1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928,
1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4516 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4516 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4518 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4518 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4518 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4520 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4520 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4520 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4521 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958,
1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944,
1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929,
1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4521 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4522 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4522 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4523 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4523 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4523 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4523 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4524 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4524 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4524 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4524 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4526 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4526 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4527 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944,
1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929,
1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4527 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4528 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4528 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4528 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4529 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4529 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4529 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4529 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4529 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4530 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4530 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4530 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4532 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4532 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4532 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4532 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4532 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4533 1/2 WALNUT GROVE
AVE
2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4533 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4533 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4534 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4535 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4535 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4535 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4536 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4536 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4538 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4538 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4538 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4539 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4539 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4539 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4539 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4539 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4542 1/2 WALNUT GROVE
AVE
2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4542 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1980, 1976,
1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960,
1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4542 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4542 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4542 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4544 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4544 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4545 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960,
1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4545 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4545 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4546 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4546 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4548 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4548 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4549 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4549 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4550 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4550 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4552 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4552 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4552 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4552 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4558 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4558 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4561 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4561 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4598 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4602 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4602 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4602 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4603 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958,
1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942,
1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928,
1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4603 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4603 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4606 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4606 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4607 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4607 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958,
1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942,
1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928,
1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4607 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4612 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958,
1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942,
1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928,
1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4612 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4612 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4613 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944,
1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929,
1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4613 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4613 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4616 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4616 BARTLETT AVE 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4616 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4617 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4617 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4623 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4623 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4623 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4624 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4624 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4629 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4629 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4629 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4634 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4634 BARTLETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4634 BARTLETT ST 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4641 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4654 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4671 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4676 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4702 1/2 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4702 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4702 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4703 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4703 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4703 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4703 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4706 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4706 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4706 HALKETT AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4709 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4709 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1972, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958,
1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944,
1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929,
1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4710 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4712 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4713 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4715 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4715 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4715 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4716 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4716 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4720 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4720 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4723 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4723 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4724 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4725 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4725 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4726 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4726 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4728 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4729 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4729 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4729 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
4732 BARTLETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4732 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4732 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4735 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4740 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960,
1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944,
1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929,
1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4740 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4741 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
4745 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
4754 HALKETT AVE 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
8504 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
8504 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8512 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8512 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8516 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8516 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8520 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8520 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8526 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8526 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
8541 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8541 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8544 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8544 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8547 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8547 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8604 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8604 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8605 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8605 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
8610 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1981,
1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960,
1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8610 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8610 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964,
1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8610 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8611 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8611 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8616 BLUE CIR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8616 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8617 BLUE CIR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8617 BLUE CIR 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
8618 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1976,
1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958,
1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944,
1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929,
1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8618 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8623 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8625 MISSION DR 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
8630 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8630 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8632 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8632 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8634 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8634 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
8635 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8635 MISSION DR 2015, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8636 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980,
1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8636 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8637 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960,
1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8637 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8639 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8639 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
8644 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8644 MISSION DR 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
8645 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8645 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8650 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8650 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8651 MISSION DR 2009, 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8651 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
8654 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966,
1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
8655 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958,
1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942,
1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928,
1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8655 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8658 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
FINDINGS
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
8658 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8701 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8701 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8702 MISSION DR 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985,
1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963,
1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948,
1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933,
1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8702 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945,
1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930,
1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8703 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986,
1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946,
1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931,
1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8703 MISSION DR 2006, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1986, 1985, 1981,
1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962,
1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947,
1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932,
1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8710 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966,
1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949,
1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934,
1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
8714 MISSION DR 2015, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991,
1990, 1986, 1985, 1981, 1976, 1975, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1966, 1965,
1964, 1963, 1962, 1961, 1960, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950,
1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935,
1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921,
1920
TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE
The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not
identified in the research source.
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
8601 Mission Drive 2009, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1992, 1991, 1990,
1986, 1981, 1976, 1972, 1971, 1970, 1969, 1967, 1965, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1961,
1958, 1956, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1950, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1944,
1942, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1930, 1929,
1928, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1924, 1923, 1921, 1920
Remedial Excavation Completion Report
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
April 7, 2022
Prepared for: Borstein Enterprises 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820 Los Angeles, California 90025 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 735 East Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, California 92408
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
This document entitled Remedial Excavation Completion Report was prepared by Stantec Consulting
Services Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Borstein Enterprises (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document
by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the
scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the
Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the
document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document,
Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document
is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs
or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions
taken based on this document.
Prepared by (signature) Brian Viggiano, PG, Principal Geologist
Approved by
(signature)
Kyle Emerson, CEG, Managing Principal Geologist
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 2.1
1.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LAND USE ............................................................. 2.1
2.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS .................................................................................... 2.1
3.0 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION .......................................................................................... 3.3
3.1 PRE-FIELD ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................. 3.3 3.1.1 South Coast Air Quality Management District Notification ........................... 3.3 3.1.2 Health and Safety ........................................................................................ 3.3
3.2 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES ....................................................................... 3.3
3.2.1 SCAQMD Rule 1466 Monitoring .................................................................. 3.4 3.2.2 Remedial Excavation .................................................................................. 3.5
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 4.6
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – Summary of Post -Excavation Soil Chlordane Results
Table 2 – PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Property Location Map
Figure 2 – Site Map, Chlordane Analytical Results
Figure 3 – Remedial Excavation
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – SCAQMD Rule 1466 Notification
Appendix B – Field and Data Monitoring Logs
Appendix C – Waste Disposal Documents
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Introduction
vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 2.1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) has prepared this Remedial Excavation Completion Report for
the for the property located at 8601 and 8623 Mission Drive in the City of Rosemead, County of Los
Angeles, California (the Site or Property; Figure 1). Remedial excavation was performed based on the
results of previous investigations which identified an isolated occurrence of the organochlorine pesticide
(OCP) chlordane at concentrations that exceeded the California Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note 3
residential screening levels.
As set forth below, remedial excavation and off-Site disposal of previously identified chlordane-impacted
soil resulted in residual concentrations of chlordane at the Site to levels below residential DTSC
screening levels. As a result of these remedial actions, no further action regarding chlordane-impacted
soil is warranted at the Site.
1.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LAND USE
The Property consists of three parcels of vacant land, totaling approximately 3.34 acres, addressed as
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive, City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California (the “Property”).
Surrounding property uses consists of residential to the north, east, and south, and vacant land and a
plant nursery to the west. A Property location map is illustrated on Figure 1. A Property map illustrating
the main features of the Property is provided as Figure 2.
1.2 PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The Property is located in Los Angeles County. The area is located within the Peninsular Ranges
Geomorphic Province, which includes northwest-southeast trending mountain ranges and valleys that have
been developed by the San Andreas Fault system (California Geological Survey [CGS], 2002). The
stratigraphy underlying the vicinity of the Property consists primarily of recent-age alluvium (CDMG, 1965).
The geology in the area of the Property consists of unconsolidated alluvium overlying marine sedimentary
bedrock. The bedrock sequence with increasing depth consists of the Pico, Puente, and Topanga
Formations, and the Santa Monica Slate basement complex. The Property area alluvium primarily consists
of relatively fine-grained sediments with less prevalent layers of coarse-grained sediments.
The closest mapped recently active fault is the Rio Hondo Fault located approximately 2 miles southeast
(CGS, 2010). According to official maps of California, the Site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo (AP)
Earthquake Fault Zone boundary but is within a liquefaction zone (CDMG, 2000).
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Introduction
vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 2.2
1.3 PROPERTY HYDROGEOLOGY
The Property is located within the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin. The basin is located within the
eastern portion of Los Angeles County and includes most of San Gabriel Valley and part of the Santa Ana
Valley. The basin is constrained by bedrock and faults on all sides. Several aquifers are present in the basin
and water-bearing units consist of Holocene alluvium up to 4,100 feet in thickness and Pleistocene marine
deposits up to 2,000 feet in thickness (Department of Water Resources [DWR], 2004).
Three distinct groundwater zones occur in the Property area: shallow, intermediate, and deep. The shallow
groundwater zone is the first-encountered groundwater. Each groundwater zone generally dips to the
southeast. Although there is considerably variability in the area of the Property, the transition between
groundwater zones is typically observed between 200 and 250 feet below ground surface (bgs) for the
shallow and intermediate zones, and between 450 and 650 feet bgs for the intermediate and deep zones
(EPA, 2009). Currently, the depth to groundwater is expected to range from 190 to 365 feet bgs in Property
Area. (EPA, 2016).
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Previous Investigations
vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 2.1
2.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
According to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by Stantec dated October 6, 2021, the
Property appeared to have been used for agricultural purposes between circa 1928 and the mid-1950s.
Historical agricultural use can be a potential concern due to the possible use of pesticides and herbicides
containing heavy metals. Stantec identified this historical agricultural use as a recognized environmental
condition (REC) in the Phase I ESA. Accordingly, Stantec recommended collection of shallow soil samples
for chemical analysis to determine if organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) or heavy metals (lead and arsenic),
typically associated with herbicides, were present at levels that represent an environmental concern to
residential development of the Property.
On October 20, 2021, Stantec advanced ten (10) shallow borings to three (3) feet below ground surface
(bgs) across the Property identified as HA-01 through HA-10 of Figure 2 attached. Soil samples were
collected at the 0.5-1.0-foot interval, 1.5-2.0-feet interval, and the 2.5-3.0-feet interval in each boring. The
shallow soil samples (0.5-1.0-foot) from each boring were analyzed for OCPs by United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) test method 8081A and arsenic and lead by USEPA test
method 6010B.
Initial Phase II ESA Soil Results
The ten soil samples (one from each soil boring completed) were analyzed from the 1-ft depth interval had
detections of arsenic at concentrations ranging from 1.3 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 8.3 mg/kg.
These concentrations are within the naturally occurring background level of 0.5 to 11.0 mg/kg for arsenic
as presented in published documents recognized by the State of California. Additionally, all ten soil samples
collected from the 1-ft interval had detections of lead at concentrations between 6.3 and 75 mg/kg. These
concentrations are below the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) Human and Ecological Risk
Office (HERO) Note 3 regulatory residential screening level of 80 mg/kg and below the United States
Department of Environmental Protection (USEPA) Regulatory Screening Level of 400 mg/kg. Therefore,
lead and arsenic are not considered an environmental concern to the Property and Stantec recommends
no further investigation regarding these metals on the Property.
Minor detections of OCPs were detected including 4,4-DDT at samples HA-01 through HA-04 ranging
between 0.0022 and 0.0064 mg/kg and 4,4’-DDE at HA-02 at 0.0082 mg/kg. Dieldrin was reported at peak
levels of 0.0024 mg/kg at HA-02. These detections were below their respective regulatory screening levels
for 4,4-DDT, 4,4-DDE, and dieldrin, and the cumulative total of DDT and DDE are below the California
hazardous waste level of 1.0 mg/kg.
Chlordane, alpha-chlordane, and gamma-chlordane were detected at boring location HA-07-1 at 3.4 mg/kg,
0.29 mg/kg, and 0.4 mg/kg, respectively at one foot in depth. Chlordane exceeded the HERO Note 3
residential screening level of 1.7 mg/kg at this one location in the surface soil sample. To determine the
depth of migration of the chlordane and related compounds, the soil samples from 2 and 3 feet bgs were
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Previous Investigations
vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 2.2
also analyzed for OCPs from boring HA-07. The results indicated that chlordane was detected in the
samples collected at the 2 and 3-foot intervals from boring HA-07 at 2.9 and 5.0 mg/kg, respectively.
Based on the surrounding borings (HA-05, HA-08, and HA-09), where chlordane was not detected, the
lateral limits appeared to be localized to boring HA-07. Given the soil samples collected from boring HA-07
the vertical limits of impact above the residential screening level have not been defined to a depth of three
(3) feet bgs. Additional investigations were recommended to better evaluate the vertical and lateral limits
of impact.
On November 29, 2021, Stantec completed an Additional Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Report, which provided the results of additional investigation to define the lateral and vertical limits of
chlordane impacts at soil boring HA-07. To complete this assessment, one boring was completed
adjacent to the boring HA-07 and was drilled to a depth of five (5) bgs. In total, eight additional step-out
borings were completed surrounding HA-07. These step-out borings were placed as shown on Figure 2
(attached) and identified as boring HA-07 and borings HA-11 through HA-18. Soil samples were collected
at depths of four and five feet bgs in boring HA-07 and at one, three, and five feet bgs in borings HA-11
through HA-18, when refusal did not occur.
Each soil sample was analyzed from the immediately adjacent step-out borings (HA-11, HA-13, HA-15, and
HA-17) from the depth at which samples were collected. The laboratory analysis reported no chlordane in
any of the samples collected from boring HA-07 at a depth of four (4) and five (5) feet bgs at concentrations
above the HERO Note 3 levels of 1.7 mg/kg for residential use. Therefore, the vertical limits of the
chlordane were constrained to less than four feet bgs. The soil samples collected from step-out borings
HA-11, HA-13, HA-15, and HA-17 also reported no chlordane above the HERO Note 3 levels of 1.7 mg/kg
for residential use. All other organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) were either reported below laboratory
reporting levels or were “non-detect”.
Based on the analytical results generated by this Additional Phase II ESA, chlordane above the 1.7 mg/kg
residential screening level is present surrounding boring HA-07 and outward less than 20 feet in all
directions. The vertical limit appears to be less than four feet bgs in depth. Based on these vertical and
lateral limits, Stantec estimates the quantity of soil present on the property that contains chlordane above
the residential screening level of 1.7 mg/kg surrounding boring HA-07 amounts to approximately 300 cubic
yards or less, which should be removed from the Property prior to site development activities.
Except as noted above, no additional impacts to soil were identified on the subject Property that would
require further assessment or remedial action and Stantec recommends no further action or investigation
regarding the environmental condition of the Property.
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Remedial Excavation
vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 3.3
3.0 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION
The scope of work conducted during this remedial action consisted of the following general elements:
1. Pre-Field activities: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and update to the
Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan;
2. Remedial Excavation, air monitoring, waste profiling, and off-site disposal.
The following sections describe the implemented scope of work.
3.1 PRE-FIELD ACTIVITIES
3.1.1 South Coast Air Quality Management District Notification
Initial notification to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) was made a minimum of 72
hours in advance of excavation work on March 17, 2022, and the Site was issued a Notification No. of
5275. The notification was processed on March 24, 2022, and notification number of 692790 was
assigned to the Site. A copy of the email confirmation from SCAQMD is included in Appendix A.
3.1.2 Health and Safety
The existing Site-specific health and safety plan (HASP) was updated to include work elements
associated with the remedial excavation and provided to DTSC for review and approval prior to
implementation of the remedial action. That HASP presented controls and procedures to be implemented
to minimize incidents, injury, and health risks associated with the excavation and exposure to chemicals
of potential concern (COPCs). The completed HASP was prepared in accordance with OSHA Hazardous
Waste Operations Standards (29 CFR 1910.120 and CCR Title 8). A copy of the referenced HASP was
maintained on-Site with the Stantec representative for reference during all remediation activities.
All field personnel were required to review the HASP prior to commencement of field work. Prior to the
initialization of daily field activities, a safety meeting was conducted at the Property. All on-Site workers
were required to sign the daily safety meeting attendance log.
3.2 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES
Remedial excavation was conducted to remove identified Site soil with concentrations of chlordane that
exceeded the DTSC HERO Note 3 residential screening level of 1.7 mg/Kg. As depicted on Figure 2 and
Figure 3, the lateral limits of impact were defined by soil borings HA-11, HA-13, and HA-15. The vertical
limit of impact was defined by soil boring HA-07. The soil borings were used to constrain the excavation
limits to approximately 40 feet by 40 feet by 4 feet deep. Soil analytical results are presented on Table 1
and Figure 3.
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Remedial Excavation
vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 3.4
3.2.1 SCAQMD Rule 1466 Monitoring
In accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1466 (Rule), dust monitoring and administrative procedures were
implemented during the remedial action. The rule requires ambient PM10 monitoring, dust control
measures, notification, signage and record keeping requirements when conducting earth-moving activities
of soil with applicable toxic air contaminants (chlordane).
To comply with the rule, signage was posted indicating Site contact information and contaminants of
concern (chlordane) at all sides of the Property. Signage indicating a maximum speed limit for on-Site
vehicles of five mile per hour (MPH) was also posted at the entrance to the property. In addition, to monitor
ambient upwind and downwind particulate concentrations, two particulate dust monitors (DustTrack DRX)
capable of logging PM10 dust concentrations at one-minute intervals were placed at the approximate upwind
and downwind property boundaries. Per Rule 1466, the upwind monitor is indicative of background (or
ambient) PM10 levels and is not generally influenced by fugitive dust sources from the Site.
In accordance with Rule 1466 PM10 dust concentrations were calculated by subtracting the results of the
upwind monitor from the downwind monitor and evaluated on a 120-minute rolling average. Table 2
presents PM10 measurements and the 120-minute rolling averages calculated in accordance with Rule
1466. As calculated above, based on the 120-minute rolling average, no fugitive PM10 concentrations in
excess of 25 µg/m3 above ambient background were measured during earth-moving activities. Stantec
notes that on March 28, 2022, the upwind monitor was knocked over between approximately 7:20 AM and
7:35 AM. As a result, the upwind measurements during this time period are not reflective of actual Site
conditions; however, downwind PM10 measurements during this time period are all less than 25 ug/m3
A weather station capable of measuring windspeed and direction was placed within the Site boundaries to
monitor wind parameters. Furthermore, an SCAQMD certified Dust Supervisor was on-Site during all
required earth-moving activities.
Records were kept to document both the absence of dust particulate concentrations in excess of actionable
thresholds, and the earth-moving activities at the Site. The following logs were kept to document the
earthmoving activities:
• Rule 1466 Earth-moving activity logs;
• Rule 1466 Instrument logs;
• Rule 1466 PM10 Monitoring Logs; and
• Rule 1466 Stockpile Logs.
Copies of field logs and data logs from the dust monitors are included in Appendix B.
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Remedial Excavation
vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 3.5
3.2.2 Remedial Excavation
Removal of impacted soil was conducted on March 28, 2022, by B&D Construction Co., Inc. (B&D). B&D
is a licensed California contractor with the following certifications and certifications and permits:
• CAL/OSHA Permit, 2002-901875
• Contractor's License, 776709 & 326942:
o A-General Engineering Contractor;
o C21-Building Moving, Demolition;
o HAZ-Hazardous Substances Removal;
• Hazardous Substance Removal Actions Certification, A-8031 & A-3948
• Annual Transportation Permit
• Motor Carrier Permit, 75355
• Dept. Toxic Substances Control, 3374
• SCAQMD 1166, 402539
• Environmental Protection Agency, 372284
• Environmental Protection Agency, 93081
Excavation was conducted to remove soil in an approximately 40-foot by 40-foot by 5-foot-deep volume
bounded by soil borings HA-11, HA-17, HA-13, HA-15, and HA-07 (Figure 3) which previously defined
the limits of excavation.
Remedial excavation was conducted using a hydraulic excavator to remove soils to targeted removal
depths and relocating removed soils to a plastic-lined stockpile constructed to be less than 400 cubic
yards in size and no more than six (6) feet in height, in accordance with Rule 1466 permit requirements.
The stockpile was subsequently covered with plastic sheeting to limit fugitive dust emissions and run off,
labeled, and recorded on Stockpile Logs (Appendix C).
In total, approximately 300 cubic yards (516 tons) of soil were excavated, profiled as non-hazardous and
disposed off-Site to the Waste Management – Azusa Landfill, located at 1211 West Gladstone, Azusa,
California. Figure 3 provides the final remedial excavation boundaries and the soil boring data used to
confirm removal of the impacted soil. Copies of the non-hazardous waste manifests, tonnage summary
and weight tickets, waste profile documentation, and stockpile sample analytical results are included in
Appendix C.
As depicted on Figures 2 and 3, and summarized on Table 1, all remaining reported soil chlordane
concentrations are below the residential DTSC HERO Note 3 screening level of 1.7 mg/Kg. Based on
these results, no additional investigation or remedial actions are recommended for the identified
chlordane soil impacts.
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION COMPLETION REPORT
Conclusions and Recommendations
vb v:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\deliverable\reports\rem_exc\rosemead_exc_report.docx 4.6
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
On March 28, 2022, Stantec oversaw the excavation and removal of approximately 300 cu yds of
impacted soil at the Site. The excavation was conducted to remove soil contaminated with chlordane
above the DTSC HERO Note 3 residential screening level of 1.7 mg/Kg to a maximum depth of 5 feet
bgs. Soil was excavated laterally to predefined soil boring locations which demonstrated concentrations
of chlordane below the DTSC HERO Note 3 screening level. Post remediation site-wide reported
chlordane levels are presented on Figure 2 and Figure 3, and tabulated on Table 2. All reported post
remediation chlordane concentrations are below residential screening levels. As such, no further action
with respect to chlordane impacts in soil is warranted.
In total, approximately 300 cubic yards (516 tons) of soil were excavated, profiled as non-hazardous and
disposed off-Site to the Waste Management – Azusa Landfill, located at 1211 West Gladstone, Azusa,
California. Copies of the non-hazardous waste manifests, tonnage summary and weight tickets, waste
profile documentation, and stockpile sample analytical results are included in Appendix C.
The results of the completed remedial excavation activities document the complete removal of impacted
soils above DTSC HERO Note 3 screening levels at the Site. Accordingly, based on the above, the
remedial excavation is deemed complete and no further remedial action is recommended.
TABLES
Table 1Summary of Post-Excavation Soil Chlordane Results(mg/Kg)8601 and 8623 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770Stantec Project No.: 18505355Chlordane1.71.7HA-01-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-02-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-03-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-04-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-05-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-06-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.001HA-07-4 4 11/11/20210.019HA-07-5 5 11/11/20210.083HA-08-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.0085HA-09-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.0085HA-10-1 1 10/19/2021 <0.0085HA-11-1 1 11/11/20210.068HA-11-3 3 11/11/2021 <0.0085HA-11-5 5 11/11/2021 <0.0085HA-13-1 1 11/11/20211.6HA-13-3 3 11/11/20210.38HA-15-1 1 11/11/20210.31HA-15-3 3 11/11/20210.11HA-15-5 5 11/11/20210.05HA-17-1 1 11/11/20210.03HA-17-3 3 11/11/20210.028Notes: All concentrations reported in miligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).(1) - More conservative screening level between USEPA Region 9 RSL (May, 2021) and DTSC HERO Note 3 (June, 2020).DTSC - Department of Toxic Substance ControlHERO HHRA - Human and Ecological Risk Office Human Health Risk AssessmentRSL - Regional Screening LevelUSEPA - United States Environmental Protection AgencyOCPs - Organochlorine PesticidesOCPs by 8081AUSEPA RSLs (Residential)DTSC HERO Note 3 (Residential)Sample IDSample Depth (feet)Sample Date
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
3/28/2022 7:02:58 38 7:03:22 74 36
3/28/2022 7:03:58 249 7:04:22 39 -210
3/28/2022 7:04:58 55 7:05:22 16 -39
3/28/2022 7:05:58 27 7:06:22 15 -12
3/28/2022 7:06:58 52 7:07:22 15 -37
3/28/2022 7:07:58 45 7:08:22 15 -30
3/28/2022 7:08:58 28 7:09:22 15 -13
3/28/2022 7:09:58 21 7:10:22 15 -6
3/28/2022 7:10:58 25 7:11:22 15 -10
3/28/2022 7:11:58 22 7:12:22 15 -7
3/28/2022 7:12:58 21 7:13:22 14 -7
3/28/2022 7:13:58 116 7:14:22 14 -102
3/28/2022 7:14:58 38 7:15:22 14 -24
3/28/2022 7:15:58 21 7:16:22 14 -7
3/28/2022 7:16:58 16 7:17:22 14 -2
3/28/2022 7:17:58 68 7:18:22 14 -54
3/28/2022 7:18:58 32 7:19:22 13 -19
3/28/2022 7:19:58 6110 7:20:22 14 -6096
3/28/2022 7:20:58 123 7:21:22 14 -109
3/28/2022 7:21:58 58 7:22:22 13 -45
3/28/2022 7:22:58 33 7:23:22 14 -19
3/28/2022 7:23:58 53 7:24:22 14 -39
3/28/2022 7:24:58 63 7:25:22 14 -49
3/28/2022 7:25:58 70 7:26:22 14 -56
3/28/2022 7:26:58 30 7:27:22 13 -17
3/28/2022 7:27:58 21 7:28:22 14 -7
3/28/2022 7:28:58 20 7:29:22 13 -7
3/28/2022 7:29:58 17 7:30:22 13 -4
3/28/2022 7:30:58 16 7:31:22 13 -3
3/28/2022 7:31:58 25 7:32:22 13 -12
3/28/2022 7:32:58 23 7:33:22 13 -10
3/28/2022 7:33:58 74 7:34:22 12 -62
3/28/2022 7:34:58 127 7:35:22 12 -115
3/28/2022 7:35:58 27 7:36:22 12 -15
3/28/2022 7:36:58 19 7:37:22 12 -7
3/28/2022 7:37:58 20 7:38:22 11 -9
3/28/2022 7:38:58 21 7:39:22 10 -11
3/28/2022 7:39:58 20 7:40:22 11 -9
3/28/2022 7:40:58 26 7:41:22 12 -14
3/28/2022 7:41:58 23 7:42:22 12 -11
3/28/2022 7:42:58 20 7:43:22 12 -8
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
3/28/2022 7:43:58 31 7:44:22 12 -19
3/28/2022 7:44:58 47 7:45:22 13 -34
3/28/2022 7:45:58 21 7:46:22 12 -9
3/28/2022 7:46:58 20 7:47:22 11 -9
3/28/2022 7:47:58 19 7:48:22 12 -7
3/28/2022 7:48:58 21 7:49:22 12 -9
3/28/2022 7:49:58 18 7:50:22 12 -6
3/28/2022 7:50:58 17 7:51:22 11 -6
3/28/2022 7:51:58 16 7:52:22 11 -5
3/28/2022 7:52:58 23 7:53:22 11 -12
3/28/2022 7:53:58 19 7:54:22 11 -8
3/28/2022 7:54:58 24 7:55:22 11 -13
3/28/2022 7:55:58 21 7:56:22 11 -10
3/28/2022 7:56:58 22 7:57:22 11 -11
3/28/2022 7:57:58 16 7:58:22 10 -6
3/28/2022 7:58:58 20 7:59:22 11 -9
3/28/2022 7:59:58 20 8:00:22 10 -10
3/28/2022 8:00:58 31 8:01:22 11 -20
3/28/2022 8:01:58 17 8:02:22 11 -6
3/28/2022 8:02:58 20 8:03:22 10 -10
3/28/2022 8:03:58 18 8:04:22 10 -8
3/28/2022 8:04:58 17 8:05:22 10 -7
3/28/2022 8:05:58 19 8:06:22 10 -9
3/28/2022 8:06:58 22 8:07:22 10 -12
3/28/2022 8:07:58 33 8:08:22 9 -24
3/28/2022 8:08:58 23 8:09:22 10 -13
3/28/2022 8:09:58 34 8:10:22 10 -24
3/28/2022 8:10:58 27 8:11:22 9 -18
3/28/2022 8:11:58 20 8:12:22 10 -10
3/28/2022 8:12:58 18 8:13:22 10 -8
3/28/2022 8:13:58 42 8:14:22 9 -33
3/28/2022 8:14:58 18 8:15:22 10 -8
3/28/2022 8:15:58 19 8:16:22 10 -9
3/28/2022 8:16:58 21 8:17:22 9 -12
3/28/2022 8:17:58 17 8:18:22 9 -8
3/28/2022 8:18:58 19 8:19:22 10 -9
3/28/2022 8:19:58 17 8:20:22 9 -8
3/28/2022 8:20:58 17 8:21:22 9 -8
3/28/2022 8:21:58 22 8:22:22 10 -12
3/28/2022 8:22:58 14 8:23:22 9 -5
3/28/2022 8:23:58 19 8:24:22 9 -10
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
3/28/2022 8:24:58 22 8:25:22 9 -13
3/28/2022 8:25:58 18 8:26:22 9 -9
3/28/2022 8:26:58 26 8:27:22 10 -16
3/28/2022 8:27:58 18 8:28:22 10 -8
3/28/2022 8:28:58 25 8:29:22 10 -15
3/28/2022 8:29:58 42 8:30:22 9 -33
3/28/2022 8:30:58 26 8:31:22 9 -17
3/28/2022 8:31:58 19 8:32:22 9 -10
3/28/2022 8:32:58 19 8:33:22 10 -9
3/28/2022 8:33:58 19 8:34:22 9 -10
3/28/2022 8:34:58 16 8:35:22 9 -7
3/28/2022 8:35:58 21 8:36:22 9 -12
3/28/2022 8:36:58 18 8:37:22 10 -8
3/28/2022 8:37:58 17 8:38:22 9 -8
3/28/2022 8:38:58 18 8:39:22 9 -9
3/28/2022 8:39:58 17 8:40:22 9 -8
3/28/2022 8:40:58 18 8:41:22 8 -10
3/28/2022 8:41:58 18 8:42:22 8 -10
3/28/2022 8:42:58 12 8:43:22 8 -4
3/28/2022 8:43:58 10 8:44:22 8 -2
3/28/2022 8:44:58 20 8:45:22 7 -13
3/28/2022 8:45:58 16 8:46:22 8 -8
3/28/2022 8:46:58 19 8:47:22 8 -11
3/28/2022 8:47:58 12 8:48:22 8 -4
3/28/2022 8:48:58 15 8:49:22 8 -7
3/28/2022 8:49:58 20 8:50:22 7 -13
3/28/2022 8:50:58 23 8:51:22 8 -15
3/28/2022 8:51:58 14 8:52:22 8 -6
3/28/2022 8:52:58 14 8:53:22 8 -6
3/28/2022 8:53:58 16 8:54:22 7 -9
3/28/2022 8:54:58 12 8:55:22 6 -6
3/28/2022 8:55:58 9 8:56:22 6 -3
3/28/2022 8:56:58 18 8:57:22 7 -11
3/28/2022 8:57:58 18 8:58:22 6 -12
3/28/2022 8:58:58 11 8:59:22 5 -6
3/28/2022 8:59:58 12 9:00:22 5 -7
3/28/2022 9:00:58 15 9:01:22 5 -10
3/28/2022 9:01:58 16 9:02:22 5 -11 -67.7
3/28/2022 9:02:58 13 9:03:22 5 -8 -68.1
3/28/2022 9:03:58 9 9:04:22 5 -4 -66.4
3/28/2022 9:04:58 15 9:05:22 6 -9 -66.1
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
3/28/2022 9:05:58 15 9:06:22 5 -10 -66.1
3/28/2022 9:06:58 24 9:07:22 5 -19 -66.0
3/28/2022 9:07:58 16 9:08:22 5 -11 -65.8
3/28/2022 9:08:58 22 9:09:22 6 -16 -65.8
3/28/2022 9:09:58 26 9:10:22 5 -21 -66.0
3/28/2022 9:10:58 15 9:11:22 6 -9 -65.9
3/28/2022 9:11:58 12 9:12:22 5 -7 -65.9
3/28/2022 9:12:58 13 9:13:22 5 -8 -66.0
3/28/2022 9:13:58 11 9:14:22 6 -5 -65.1
3/28/2022 9:14:58 11 9:15:22 5 -6 -65.0
3/28/2022 9:15:58 11 9:16:22 5 -6 -65.0
3/28/2022 9:16:58 11 9:17:22 6 -5 -65.0
3/28/2022 9:17:58 20 9:18:22 6 -14 -64.7
3/28/2022 9:18:58 16 9:19:22 5 -11 -64.6
3/28/2022 9:19:58 17 9:20:22 6 -11 -13.9
3/28/2022 9:20:58 16 9:21:22 5 -11 -13.1
3/28/2022 9:21:58 14 9:22:22 5 -9 -12.8
3/28/2022 9:22:58 12 9:23:22 6 -6 -12.7
3/28/2022 9:23:58 13 9:24:22 6 -7 -12.4
3/28/2022 9:24:58 14 9:25:22 6 -8 -12.1
3/28/2022 9:25:58 9 9:26:22 6 -3 -11.6
3/28/2022 9:26:58 8 9:27:22 6 -2 -11.5
3/28/2022 9:27:58 9 9:28:22 6 -3 -11.5
3/28/2022 9:28:58 13 9:29:22 6 -7 -11.5
3/28/2022 9:29:58 10 9:30:22 5 -5 -11.5
3/28/2022 9:30:58 14 9:31:22 6 -8 -11.5
3/28/2022 9:31:58 14 9:32:22 6 -8 -11.5
3/28/2022 9:32:58 10 9:33:22 6 -4 -11.4
3/28/2022 9:33:58 11 9:34:22 6 -5 -11.0
3/28/2022 9:34:58 11 9:35:22 5 -6 -10.1
3/28/2022 9:35:58 9 9:36:22 5 -4 -10.0
3/28/2022 9:36:58 17 9:37:22 6 -11 -10.0
3/28/2022 9:37:58 8 9:38:22 5 -3 -9.9
3/28/2022 9:38:58 8 9:39:22 5 -3 -9.9
3/28/2022 9:39:58 7 9:40:22 5 -2 -9.8
3/28/2022 9:40:58 10 9:41:22 5 -5 -9.7
3/28/2022 9:41:58 9 9:42:22 5 -4 -9.7
3/28/2022 9:42:58 8 9:43:22 6 -2 -9.6
3/28/2022 9:43:58 10 9:44:22 6 -4 -9.5
3/28/2022 9:44:58 8 9:45:22 5 -3 -9.3
3/28/2022 9:45:58 11 9:46:22 6 -5 -9.2
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 7:01:04 71 7:01:05 81 10
4/4/2022 7:02:04 68 7:02:05 77 9
4/4/2022 7:03:04 67 7:03:05 91 24
4/4/2022 7:04:04 67 7:04:05 72 5
4/4/2022 7:05:04 65 7:05:05 71 6
4/4/2022 7:06:04 64 7:06:05 68 4
4/4/2022 7:07:04 63 7:07:05 67 4
4/4/2022 7:08:04 63 7:08:05 67 4
4/4/2022 7:09:04 62 7:09:05 66 4
4/4/2022 7:10:04 61 7:10:05 65 4
4/4/2022 7:11:04 61 7:11:05 64 3
4/4/2022 7:12:04 61 7:12:05 62 1
4/4/2022 7:13:04 64 7:13:05 61 -3
4/4/2022 7:14:04 60 7:14:05 62 2
4/4/2022 7:15:04 61 7:15:05 61 0
4/4/2022 7:16:04 63 7:16:05 62 -1
4/4/2022 7:17:04 63 7:17:05 63 0
4/4/2022 7:18:04 63 7:18:05 63 0
4/4/2022 7:19:04 62 7:19:05 69 7
4/4/2022 7:20:04 62 7:20:05 63 1
4/4/2022 7:21:04 61 7:21:05 64 3
4/4/2022 7:22:04 61 7:22:05 64 3
4/4/2022 7:23:04 61 7:23:05 64 3
4/4/2022 7:24:04 61 7:24:05 63 2
4/4/2022 7:25:04 61 7:25:05 62 1
4/4/2022 7:26:04 59 7:26:05 64 5
4/4/2022 7:27:04 58 7:27:05 61 3
4/4/2022 7:28:04 58 7:28:05 60 2
4/4/2022 7:29:04 59 7:29:05 60 1
4/4/2022 7:30:04 59 7:30:05 61 2
4/4/2022 7:31:04 58 7:31:05 61 3
4/4/2022 7:32:04 57 7:32:05 60 3
4/4/2022 7:33:04 57 7:33:05 60 3
4/4/2022 7:34:04 58 7:34:05 62 4
4/4/2022 7:35:04 58 7:35:05 61 3
4/4/2022 7:36:04 60 7:36:05 61 1
4/4/2022 7:37:04 62 7:37:05 62 0
4/4/2022 7:38:04 64 7:38:05 66 2
4/4/2022 7:39:04 62 7:39:05 67 5
4/4/2022 7:40:04 62 7:40:05 66 4
4/4/2022 7:41:04 62 7:41:05 67 5
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 7:42:04 61 7:42:05 66 5
4/4/2022 7:43:04 61 7:43:05 66 5
4/4/2022 7:44:04 62 7:44:05 65 3
4/4/2022 7:45:04 62 7:45:05 64 2
4/4/2022 7:46:04 61 7:46:05 64 3
4/4/2022 7:47:04 62 7:47:05 64 2
4/4/2022 7:48:04 62 7:48:05 65 3
4/4/2022 7:49:04 62 7:49:05 64 2
4/4/2022 7:50:04 62 7:50:05 68 6
4/4/2022 7:51:04 61 7:51:05 67 6
4/4/2022 7:52:04 60 7:52:05 64 4
4/4/2022 7:53:04 60 7:53:05 62 2
4/4/2022 7:54:04 61 7:54:05 62 1
4/4/2022 7:55:04 61 7:55:05 63 2
4/4/2022 7:56:04 60 7:56:05 64 4
4/4/2022 7:57:04 59 7:57:05 62 3
4/4/2022 7:58:04 58 7:58:05 61 3
4/4/2022 7:59:04 59 7:59:05 63 4
4/4/2022 8:00:04 59 8:00:05 63 4
4/4/2022 8:01:04 59 8:01:05 65 6
4/4/2022 8:02:04 59 8:02:05 63 4
4/4/2022 8:03:04 59 8:03:05 63 4
4/4/2022 8:04:04 59 8:04:05 63 4
4/4/2022 8:05:04 58 8:05:05 69 11
4/4/2022 8:06:04 56 8:06:05 66 10
4/4/2022 8:07:04 56 8:07:05 64 8
4/4/2022 8:08:04 56 8:08:05 61 5
4/4/2022 8:09:04 55 8:09:05 60 5
4/4/2022 8:10:04 55 8:10:05 59 4
4/4/2022 8:11:04 55 8:11:05 64 9
4/4/2022 8:12:04 56 8:12:05 60 4
4/4/2022 8:13:04 55 8:13:05 59 4
4/4/2022 8:14:04 55 8:14:05 59 4
4/4/2022 8:15:04 55 8:15:05 59 4
4/4/2022 8:16:04 68 8:16:05 61 -7
4/4/2022 8:17:04 74 8:17:05 60 -14
4/4/2022 8:18:04 60 8:18:05 59 -1
4/4/2022 8:19:04 65 8:19:05 60 -5
4/4/2022 8:20:04 62 8:20:05 60 -2
4/4/2022 8:21:04 57 8:21:05 60 3
4/4/2022 8:22:04 57 8:22:05 61 4
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 8:23:04 56 8:23:05 59 3
4/4/2022 8:24:04 55 8:24:05 62 7
4/4/2022 8:25:04 55 8:25:05 57 2
4/4/2022 8:26:04 56 8:26:05 57 1
4/4/2022 8:27:04 56 8:27:05 58 2
4/4/2022 8:28:04 57 8:28:05 60 3
4/4/2022 8:29:04 58 8:29:05 62 4
4/4/2022 8:30:04 59 8:30:05 60 1
4/4/2022 8:31:04 59 8:31:05 61 2
4/4/2022 8:32:04 58 8:32:05 61 3
4/4/2022 8:33:04 57 8:33:05 60 3
4/4/2022 8:34:04 57 8:34:05 61 4
4/4/2022 8:35:04 58 8:35:05 60 2
4/4/2022 8:36:04 58 8:36:05 60 2
4/4/2022 8:37:04 58 8:37:05 60 2
4/4/2022 8:38:04 57 8:38:05 60 3
4/4/2022 8:39:04 57 8:39:05 59 2
4/4/2022 8:40:04 58 8:40:05 60 2
4/4/2022 8:41:04 59 8:41:05 59 0
4/4/2022 8:42:04 57 8:42:05 60 3
4/4/2022 8:43:04 56 8:43:05 59 3
4/4/2022 8:44:04 57 8:44:05 58 1
4/4/2022 8:45:04 57 8:45:05 59 2
4/4/2022 8:46:04 57 8:46:05 59 2
4/4/2022 8:47:04 56 8:47:05 59 3
4/4/2022 8:48:04 57 8:48:05 60 3
4/4/2022 8:49:04 59 8:49:05 60 1
4/4/2022 8:50:04 58 8:50:05 61 3
4/4/2022 8:51:04 59 8:51:05 62 3
4/4/2022 8:52:04 60 8:52:05 61 1
4/4/2022 8:53:04 61 8:53:05 62 1
4/4/2022 8:54:04 64 8:54:05 63 -1
4/4/2022 8:55:04 64 8:55:05 66 2
4/4/2022 8:56:04 64 8:56:05 67 3
4/4/2022 8:57:04 64 8:57:05 67 3
4/4/2022 8:58:04 64 8:58:05 67 3
4/4/2022 8:59:04 64 8:59:05 68 4
4/4/2022 9:00:04 63 9:00:05 68 5 3
4/4/2022 9:01:04 64 9:01:05 69 5 3
4/4/2022 9:02:04 64 9:02:05 66 2 3
4/4/2022 9:03:04 62 9:03:05 66 4 3
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 9:04:04 62 9:04:05 65 3 3
4/4/2022 9:05:04 61 9:05:05 65 4 3
4/4/2022 9:06:04 61 9:06:05 65 4 3
4/4/2022 9:07:04 61 9:07:05 65 4 3
4/4/2022 9:08:04 60 9:08:05 65 5 3
4/4/2022 9:09:04 60 9:09:05 65 5 3
4/4/2022 9:10:04 61 9:10:05 65 4 3
4/4/2022 9:11:04 61 9:11:05 65 4 3
4/4/2022 9:12:04 61 9:12:05 65 4 3
4/4/2022 9:13:04 61 9:13:05 64 3 3
4/4/2022 9:14:04 61 9:14:05 63 2 3
4/4/2022 9:15:04 61 9:15:05 63 2 3
4/4/2022 9:16:04 60 9:16:05 63 3 3
4/4/2022 9:17:04 60 9:17:05 64 4 3
4/4/2022 9:18:04 61 9:18:05 66 5 3
4/4/2022 9:19:04 60 9:19:05 63 3 3
4/4/2022 9:20:04 60 9:20:05 63 3 3
4/4/2022 9:21:04 60 9:21:05 63 3 3
4/4/2022 9:22:04 60 9:22:05 63 3 3
4/4/2022 9:23:04 60 9:23:05 64 4 3
4/4/2022 9:24:04 60 9:24:05 64 4 3
4/4/2022 9:25:04 60 9:25:05 64 4 3
4/4/2022 9:26:04 60 9:26:05 64 4 3
4/4/2022 9:27:04 64 9:27:05 64 0 3
4/4/2022 9:28:04 62 9:28:05 64 2 3
4/4/2022 9:29:04 62 9:29:05 64 2 3
4/4/2022 9:30:04 62 9:30:05 65 3 3
4/4/2022 9:31:04 62 9:31:05 67 5 3
4/4/2022 9:32:04 60 9:32:05 65 5 3
4/4/2022 9:33:04 60 9:33:05 65 5 3
4/4/2022 9:34:04 60 9:34:05 64 4 3
4/4/2022 9:35:04 59 9:35:05 64 5 3
4/4/2022 9:36:04 58 9:36:05 64 6 3
4/4/2022 9:37:04 59 9:37:05 63 4 3
4/4/2022 9:38:04 59 9:38:05 63 4 3
4/4/2022 9:39:04 59 9:39:05 63 4 3
4/4/2022 9:40:04 59 9:40:05 64 5 3
4/4/2022 9:41:04 58 9:41:05 63 5 3
4/4/2022 9:42:04 58 9:42:05 62 4 3
4/4/2022 9:43:04 58 9:43:05 61 3 3
4/4/2022 9:44:04 58 9:44:05 62 4 3
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 9:45:04 59 9:45:05 62 3 3
4/4/2022 9:46:04 59 9:46:05 60 1 3
4/4/2022 9:47:04 60 9:47:05 62 2 3
4/4/2022 9:48:04 58 9:48:05 61 3 3
4/4/2022 9:49:04 57 9:49:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 9:50:04 57 9:50:05 61 4 3
4/4/2022 9:51:04 58 9:51:05 62 4 3
4/4/2022 9:52:04 57 9:52:05 61 4 3
4/4/2022 9:53:04 57 9:53:05 62 5 3
4/4/2022 9:54:04 58 9:54:05 60 2 3
4/4/2022 9:55:04 58 9:55:05 60 2 3
4/4/2022 9:56:04 58 9:56:05 60 2 3
4/4/2022 9:57:04 58 9:57:05 60 2 3
4/4/2022 9:58:04 57 9:58:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 9:59:04 57 9:59:05 59 2 3
4/4/2022 10:00:04 57 10:00:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 10:01:04 57 10:01:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 10:02:04 58 10:02:05 61 3 3
4/4/2022 10:03:04 58 10:03:05 61 3 3
4/4/2022 10:04:04 59 10:04:05 60 1 3
4/4/2022 10:05:04 58 10:05:05 61 3 3
4/4/2022 10:06:04 58 10:06:05 60 2 3
4/4/2022 10:07:04 57 10:07:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 10:08:04 58 10:08:05 60 2 3
4/4/2022 10:09:04 57 10:09:05 59 2 3
4/4/2022 10:10:04 57 10:10:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 10:11:04 57 10:11:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 10:12:04 57 10:12:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 10:13:04 56 10:13:05 60 4 3
4/4/2022 10:14:04 56 10:14:05 59 3 3
4/4/2022 10:15:04 57 10:15:05 58 1 3
4/4/2022 10:16:04 57 10:16:05 58 1 3
4/4/2022 10:17:04 56 10:17:05 58 2 3
4/4/2022 10:18:04 57 10:18:05 60 3 3
4/4/2022 10:19:04 56 10:19:05 61 5 3
4/4/2022 10:20:04 56 10:20:05 59 3 3
4/4/2022 10:21:04 56 10:21:05 58 2 3
4/4/2022 10:22:04 56 10:22:05 59 3 3
4/4/2022 10:23:04 55 10:23:05 59 4 3
4/4/2022 10:24:04 55 10:24:05 59 4 3
4/4/2022 10:25:04 55 10:25:05 58 3 3
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 10:26:04 55 10:26:05 58 3 3
4/4/2022 10:27:04 55 10:27:05 57 2 3
4/4/2022 10:28:04 56 10:28:05 58 2 3
4/4/2022 10:29:04 55 10:29:05 58 3 3
4/4/2022 10:30:04 54 10:30:05 60 6 3
4/4/2022 10:31:04 53 10:31:05 57 4 3
4/4/2022 10:32:04 53 10:32:05 55 2 3
4/4/2022 10:33:04 53 10:33:05 81 28 3
4/4/2022 10:34:04 51 10:34:05 62 11 3
4/4/2022 10:35:04 51 10:35:05 54 3 3
4/4/2022 10:36:04 51 10:36:05 53 2 3
4/4/2022 10:37:04 51 10:37:05 54 3 3
4/4/2022 10:38:04 51 10:38:05 53 2 3
4/4/2022 10:39:04 52 10:39:05 55 3 3
4/4/2022 10:40:04 53 10:40:05 54 1 3
4/4/2022 10:41:04 52 10:41:05 62 10 3
4/4/2022 10:42:04 53 10:42:05 54 1 3
4/4/2022 10:43:04 55 10:43:05 56 1 3
4/4/2022 10:44:04 55 10:44:05 56 1 3
4/4/2022 10:45:04 57 10:45:05 58 1 3
4/4/2022 10:46:04 56 10:46:05 56 0 3
4/4/2022 10:47:04 58 10:47:05 56 -2 3
4/4/2022 10:48:04 57 10:48:05 54 -3 3
4/4/2022 10:49:04 56 10:49:05 54 -2 3
4/4/2022 10:50:04 53 10:50:05 54 1 3
4/4/2022 10:51:04 52 10:51:05 54 2 3
4/4/2022 10:52:04 53 10:52:05 60 7 3
4/4/2022 10:53:04 53 10:53:05 54 1 3
4/4/2022 10:54:04 53 10:54:05 53 0 3
4/4/2022 10:55:04 54 10:55:05 53 -1 3
4/4/2022 10:56:04 54 10:56:05 53 -1 3
4/4/2022 10:57:04 55 10:57:05 53 -2 3
4/4/2022 10:58:04 55 10:58:05 60 5 3
4/4/2022 10:59:04 55 10:59:05 59 4 3
4/4/2022 11:00:04 55 11:00:05 63 8 3
4/4/2022 11:01:04 55 11:01:05 56 1 3
4/4/2022 11:02:04 54 11:02:05 55 1 3
4/4/2022 11:03:04 53 11:03:05 56 3 3
4/4/2022 11:04:04 56 11:04:05 54 -2 3
4/4/2022 11:05:04 54 11:05:05 52 -2 3
4/4/2022 11:06:04 52 11:06:05 57 5 3
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 11:07:04 53 11:07:05 53 0 3
4/4/2022 11:08:04 53 11:08:05 53 0 3
4/4/2022 11:09:04 53 11:09:05 52 -1 3
4/4/2022 11:10:04 54 11:10:05 54 0 3
4/4/2022 11:11:04 54 11:11:05 54 0 3
4/4/2022 11:12:04 68 11:12:05 53 -15 3
4/4/2022 11:13:04 56 11:13:05 52 -4 3
4/4/2022 11:14:04 56 11:14:05 52 -4 3
4/4/2022 11:15:04 54 11:15:05 70 16 3
4/4/2022 11:16:04 54 11:16:05 56 2 3
4/4/2022 11:17:04 53 11:17:05 54 1 3
4/4/2022 11:18:04 54 11:18:05 55 1 3
4/4/2022 11:19:04 55 11:19:05 56 1 3
4/4/2022 11:20:04 56 11:20:05 54 -2 3
4/4/2022 11:21:04 55 11:21:05 56 1 3
4/4/2022 11:22:04 55 11:22:05 55 0 3
4/4/2022 11:23:04 54 11:23:05 55 1 3
4/4/2022 11:24:04 54 11:24:05 55 1 3
4/4/2022 11:25:04 55 11:25:05 54 -1 2
4/4/2022 11:26:04 54 11:26:05 54 0 2
4/4/2022 11:27:04 53 11:27:05 54 1 2
4/4/2022 11:28:04 53 11:28:05 55 2 2
4/4/2022 11:29:04 54 11:29:05 54 0 2
4/4/2022 11:30:04 54 11:30:05 54 0 2
4/4/2022 11:31:04 54 11:31:05 55 1 2
4/4/2022 11:32:04 55 11:32:05 54 -1 2
4/4/2022 11:33:04 55 11:33:05 55 0 2
4/4/2022 11:34:04 55 11:34:05 54 -1 2
4/4/2022 11:35:04 55 11:35:05 55 0 2
4/4/2022 11:36:04 55 11:36:05 54 -1 2
4/4/2022 11:37:04 53 11:37:05 56 3 2
4/4/2022 11:38:04 54 11:38:05 54 0 2
4/4/2022 11:39:04 54 11:39:05 54 0 2
4/4/2022 11:40:04 54 11:40:05 62 8 2
4/4/2022 11:41:04 52 11:41:05 57 5 2
4/4/2022 11:42:04 53 11:42:05 53 0 2
4/4/2022 11:43:04 53 11:43:05 52 -1 2
4/4/2022 11:44:04 52 11:44:05 53 1 2
4/4/2022 11:45:04 52 11:45:05 56 4 2
4/4/2022 11:46:04 51 11:46:05 52 1 2
4/4/2022 11:47:04 51 11:47:05 52 1 2
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 11:48:04 51 11:48:05 52 1 2
4/4/2022 11:49:04 53 11:49:05 53 0 2
4/4/2022 11:50:04 52 11:50:05 53 1 2
4/4/2022 11:51:04 53 11:51:05 52 -1 2
4/4/2022 11:52:04 58 11:52:05 53 -5 2
4/4/2022 11:53:04 54 11:53:05 52 -2 2
4/4/2022 11:54:04 52 11:54:05 52 0 2
4/4/2022 11:55:04 53 11:55:05 53 0 2
4/4/2022 11:56:04 53 11:56:05 52 -1 2
4/4/2022 11:57:04 52 11:57:05 52 0 2
4/4/2022 11:58:04 51 11:58:05 51 0 2
4/4/2022 11:59:04 52 11:59:05 51 -1 2
4/4/2022 12:00:04 53 12:00:05 55 2 2
4/4/2022 12:01:04 53 12:01:05 51 -2 2
4/4/2022 12:02:04 52 12:02:05 49 -3 2
4/4/2022 12:03:04 52 12:03:05 53 1 2
4/4/2022 12:04:04 52 12:04:05 53 1 2
4/4/2022 12:05:04 54 12:05:05 52 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:06:04 51 12:06:05 50 -1 1
4/4/2022 12:07:04 52 12:07:05 48 -4 1
4/4/2022 12:08:04 52 12:08:05 53 1 1
4/4/2022 12:09:04 52 12:09:05 61 9 1
4/4/2022 12:10:04 52 12:10:05 60 8 1
4/4/2022 12:11:04 51 12:11:05 51 0 1
4/4/2022 12:12:04 51 12:12:05 49 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:13:04 51 12:13:05 49 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:14:04 52 12:14:05 58 6 1
4/4/2022 12:15:04 52 12:15:05 50 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:16:04 51 12:16:05 49 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:17:04 50 12:17:05 47 -3 1
4/4/2022 12:18:04 50 12:18:05 48 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:19:04 52 12:19:05 48 -4 1
4/4/2022 12:20:04 52 12:20:05 53 1 1
4/4/2022 12:21:04 51 12:21:05 52 1 1
4/4/2022 12:22:04 52 12:22:05 51 -1 1
4/4/2022 12:23:04 53 12:23:05 51 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:24:04 52 12:24:05 50 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:25:04 52 12:25:05 50 -2 1
4/4/2022 12:26:04 53 12:26:05 50 -3 1
4/4/2022 12:27:04 52 12:27:05 55 3 1
4/4/2022 12:28:04 50 12:28:05 52 2 1
Table 2
PM10 Dust Monitoring Results
8601 and 8623 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Stantec Project No.: 18505355
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Time
PM10
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Upwind (Ambient Background)
Date
Downwind (Fugitive)
Delta1
(ug/m3)
2-hour PM10
Rolling Average
(ug/m3)
4/4/2022 12:29:04 51 12:29:05 50 -1 1
FIGURES
ProjectLocation
V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2021-10-04 By: dehernandez1
8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770
Property Location Map
Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata.
Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO,NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community
Figure No.
Title
Project Location
Client/ProjectBorstein Enterprises185805355
Property Boundary
(At original document size of 8.5x11)1:24,000 ($$¯0 1,200 2,400Feet
SUBJECT PROPERTY
ProjectLocation
V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2022-04-07 By: dehernandez2
Borstein Enterprises185805355Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
SITE MAPCHLORDANE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata.
Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: © 2022 Microsoft Corporation ©2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS
Figure No.
Title
Project Location
Client/Project
(At original document size of 8.5x11)1:1,500 ($$¯0 75 150Feet
8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770
MISS
I
O
N
D
R
I
V
EWALNUT GROVE AVENUEHA-11
HA-15HA-13
HA-17
All concentrations reported in milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg)
Property Boundary
SEE FIGURE 3
HA-11
Analyte detected above laboratory reporting limitsBOLD
Analyte not detected above laboratory
reporting limits<
Assessor Parcel
!.Soil Sample Locations
Approximate Excavation Area
V:\1858\active\185805355\05_report_deliv\drawings_design\gis_map Revised: 2022-04-07 By: dehernandez3
Borstein Enterprises185805355Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
SITE MAPREMEDIAL EXCAVATION
Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for anyerrors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of thedata.
Notes1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 11N2.Data Sources: Stantec, 20213.Background: © 2022 Microsoft Corporation ©2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DSSources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap,INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, EsriChina (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
Figure No.
Title
Project Location
Client/Project
(At original document size of 8.5x11)1:500 ($$¯0 25 50Feet
8601 Mission DriveRosemead, California 91770
All concentrations reported in milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg)
Property Boundary
Analyte detected above laboratory reporting limitsBOLD
Analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limits<
!.Soil Sample Locations
Approximate Excavation Area
APPENDIX A SCAQMD RULE 1466 NOTIFICATION
From:Robert Heller
To:Viggiano, Brian
Subject:1466 notification confirmation
Date:Monday, March 28, 2022 12:47:37 PM
From: Cathy Bartels <CBartels@aqmd.gov>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 9:15 AMTo: cgratz@bdcoinc.comCc: Rule1466 <rule1466@aqmd.gov>Subject: Rule 1466
Good Morning Mr. Miller,
The following initial notification was processed today:
Initial notification received (#5275), submitted 03/17/2022 your pending notification number is 692790.
To finalize your initial notifications, submit a printout of this email along with the required notification fee of
$68.07 per notification.
For USPS/Post Office only, mail to:
SCAQMD - Rule 1466 Notifications
File # 55641
Los Angeles, CA 90074-5641
For all other carriers, ship to:
Bank of America Lockbox ServicesLockbox # 556412706 Media Center DriveLos Angeles, CA 90065
Thank you,
Cathy Bartels
Office Assistant
South Coast Air Quality Management District
If you need to contact me immediately, please call me at the following number:
Cell 714-322-3322
Office 909-949-0360
B&D Construction
http://bdcoinc.com/
APPENDIX B FIELD AND DATA LOGS
TrakPro Version 4.70 ASCII Data File
Model:DustTrak DRX
Model Number:8533
Serial Number:8533111905
Test ID:1
Test Abbreviation:UPWIND_001
Start Date:3/28/2022
Start Time:7:01:58
Duration (dd:hh:mm:ss):0:02:46:00
Log Interval (mm:ss):1:00
Number of points:166
Notes:
Statistics Channel:PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 TOTAL
Units:mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3
Average:0.027 0.029 0.033 0.061 0.078
Minimum:0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008
Time of Minimum:8:55:58 9:39:58 9:03:58 9:39:58 9:37:58
Date of Minimum:3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022
Maximum:1.84 2 2.44 6.11 8.68
Time of Maximum:7:19:58 7:19:58 7:19:58 7:19:58 7:19:58
Date of Maximum:3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022
Calibration Sensor:AEROSOL
Cal. date 11/18/2021
Date Time PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 PM10 TOTAL
MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 ug/m3 mg/m^3
3/28/2022 7:02:58 0.02 0.022 0.024 0.038 38 0.043
3/28/2022 7:03:58 0.081 0.088 0.106 0.249 249 0.29
3/28/2022 7:04:58 0.025 0.028 0.032 0.055 55 0.061
3/28/2022 7:05:58 0.019 0.02 0.022 0.027 27 0.028
3/28/2022 7:06:58 0.03 0.032 0.035 0.052 52 0.055
3/28/2022 7:07:58 0.026 0.028 0.031 0.045 45 0.049
3/28/2022 7:08:58 0.022 0.024 0.025 0.028 28 0.03
3/28/2022 7:09:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.021 21 0.021
3/28/2022 7:10:58 0.017 0.019 0.02 0.025 25 0.026
3/28/2022 7:11:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.022 22 0.023
3/28/2022 7:12:58 0.017 0.019 0.019 0.021 21 0.021
3/28/2022 7:13:58 0.049 0.055 0.066 0.116 116 0.125
3/28/2022 7:14:58 0.021 0.023 0.026 0.038 38 0.04
3/28/2022 7:15:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.021 21 0.022
3/28/2022 7:16:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.017
3/28/2022 7:17:58 0.031 0.034 0.04 0.068 68 0.076
3/28/2022 7:18:58 0.02 0.022 0.024 0.032 32 0.033
3/28/2022 7:19:58 1.84 2 2.44 6.11 6110 8.68
3/28/2022 7:20:58 0.058 0.07 0.084 0.123 123 0.136
3/28/2022 7:21:58 0.03 0.034 0.039 0.058 58 0.063
3/28/2022 7:22:58 0.019 0.021 0.024 0.033 33 0.035
3/28/2022 7:23:58 0.029 0.032 0.036 0.053 53 0.059
3/28/2022 7:24:58 0.033 0.035 0.039 0.063 63 0.069
3/28/2022 7:25:58 0.037 0.04 0.045 0.07 70 0.078
3/28/2022 7:26:58 0.022 0.024 0.026 0.03 30 0.031
3/28/2022 7:27:58 0.016 0.018 0.019 0.021 21 0.022
3/28/2022 7:28:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.021
3/28/2022 7:29:58 0.013 0.015 0.015 0.017 17 0.018
3/28/2022 7:30:58 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.016 16 0.017
3/28/2022 7:31:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.025 25 0.027
3/28/2022 7:32:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.023 23 0.023
3/28/2022 7:33:58 0.037 0.04 0.047 0.074 74 0.083
3/28/2022 7:34:58 0.051 0.057 0.069 0.127 127 0.141
3/28/2022 7:35:58 0.018 0.02 0.021 0.027 27 0.03
3/28/2022 7:36:58 0.015 0.017 0.017 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 7:37:58 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.021
3/28/2022 7:38:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.021 21 0.021
3/28/2022 7:39:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.02 20 0.02
3/28/2022 7:40:58 0.022 0.023 0.024 0.026 26 0.027
3/28/2022 7:41:58 0.017 0.019 0.02 0.023 23 0.024
3/28/2022 7:42:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.02 20 0.02
3/28/2022 7:43:58 0.022 0.024 0.026 0.031 31 0.033
3/28/2022 7:44:58 0.027 0.029 0.032 0.047 47 0.051
3/28/2022 7:45:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.021 21 0.022
3/28/2022 7:46:58 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.02 20 0.02
3/28/2022 7:47:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 7:48:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.021 21 0.022
3/28/2022 7:49:58 0.016 0.017 0.017 0.018 18 0.018
3/28/2022 7:50:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.017 17 0.018
3/28/2022 7:51:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.016
3/28/2022 7:52:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.023 23 0.023
3/28/2022 7:53:58 0.015 0.017 0.017 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 7:54:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.024 24 0.025
3/28/2022 7:55:58 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.021 21 0.022
3/28/2022 7:56:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.022 22 0.022
3/28/2022 7:57:58 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.016 16 0.016
3/28/2022 7:58:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.021
3/28/2022 7:59:58 0.014 0.015 0.017 0.02 20 0.021
3/28/2022 8:00:58 0.02 0.021 0.023 0.031 31 0.032
3/28/2022 8:01:58 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.017 17 0.018
3/28/2022 8:02:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.021
3/28/2022 8:03:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.018 18 0.018
3/28/2022 8:04:58 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.017 17 0.017
3/28/2022 8:05:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 8:06:58 0.016 0.018 0.018 0.022 22 0.023
3/28/2022 8:07:58 0.02 0.022 0.024 0.033 33 0.036
3/28/2022 8:08:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.023 23 0.026
3/28/2022 8:09:58 0.019 0.021 0.024 0.034 34 0.037
3/28/2022 8:10:58 0.017 0.019 0.021 0.027 27 0.028
3/28/2022 8:11:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.02
3/28/2022 8:12:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.018 18 0.02
3/28/2022 8:13:58 0.021 0.024 0.027 0.042 42 0.043
3/28/2022 8:14:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.018
3/28/2022 8:15:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 8:16:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.021 21 0.022
3/28/2022 8:17:58 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.017 17 0.017
3/28/2022 8:18:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.019 19 0.021
3/28/2022 8:19:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 17 0.018
3/28/2022 8:20:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 17 0.018
3/28/2022 8:21:58 0.016 0.018 0.018 0.022 22 0.022
3/28/2022 8:22:58 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.015
3/28/2022 8:23:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 8:24:58 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.022 22 0.022
3/28/2022 8:25:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.018 18 0.019
3/28/2022 8:26:58 0.015 0.016 0.018 0.026 26 0.028
3/28/2022 8:27:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.019
3/28/2022 8:28:58 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.025 25 0.026
3/28/2022 8:29:58 0.025 0.027 0.03 0.042 42 0.043
3/28/2022 8:30:58 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.026 26 0.028
3/28/2022 8:31:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 19 0.02
3/28/2022 8:32:58 0.016 0.017 0.017 0.019 19 0.02
3/28/2022 8:33:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 8:34:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.016
3/28/2022 8:35:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.021 21 0.021
3/28/2022 8:36:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.018 18 0.018
3/28/2022 8:37:58 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.017 17 0.018
3/28/2022 8:38:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.019
3/28/2022 8:39:58 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 17 0.017
3/28/2022 8:40:58 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.018 18 0.018
3/28/2022 8:41:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.018 18 0.019
3/28/2022 8:42:58 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.012 12 0.013
3/28/2022 8:43:58 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:44:58 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.02 20 0.02
3/28/2022 8:45:58 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.016 16 0.017
3/28/2022 8:46:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 8:47:58 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 8:48:58 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.015 15 0.016
3/28/2022 8:49:58 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.02 20 0.02
3/28/2022 8:50:58 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.023 23 0.024
3/28/2022 8:51:58 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.014 14 0.015
3/28/2022 8:52:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 8:53:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.016 16 0.017
3/28/2022 8:54:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.012 12 0.014
3/28/2022 8:55:58 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:56:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.019
3/28/2022 8:57:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.018 18 0.019
3/28/2022 8:58:58 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.012
3/28/2022 8:59:58 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.012 12 0.013
3/28/2022 9:00:58 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 9:01:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.016
3/28/2022 9:02:58 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 9:03:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 9:04:58 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.016
3/28/2022 9:05:58 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 9:06:58 0.012 0.013 0.015 0.024 24 0.025
3/28/2022 9:07:58 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.016 16 0.017
3/28/2022 9:08:58 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.022 22 0.024
3/28/2022 9:09:58 0.02 0.022 0.023 0.026 26 0.026
3/28/2022 9:10:58 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.016
3/28/2022 9:11:58 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 9:12:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 9:13:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.012
3/28/2022 9:14:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 9:15:58 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 9:16:58 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 9:17:58 0.017 0.018 0.018 0.02 20 0.021
3/28/2022 9:18:58 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.016 16 0.016
3/28/2022 9:19:58 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.017 17 0.017
3/28/2022 9:20:58 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.016 16 0.016
3/28/2022 9:21:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 9:22:58 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.012 12 0.013
3/28/2022 9:23:58 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.013 13 0.014
3/28/2022 9:24:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 9:25:58 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 9:26:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.009
3/28/2022 9:27:58 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 9:28:58 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 9:29:58 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 9:30:58 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 9:31:58 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.014 14 0.015
3/28/2022 9:32:58 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 9:33:58 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 9:34:58 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 9:35:58 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 9:36:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.017 17 0.018
3/28/2022 9:37:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 9:38:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.009
3/28/2022 9:39:58 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 7 0.008
3/28/2022 9:40:58 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 9:41:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 9:42:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.009
3/28/2022 9:43:58 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 9:44:58 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 9:45:58 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 9:46:58 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.019 19 0.019
3/28/2022 9:47:58 0.01 0.011 0.013 0.02 20 0.021
Model:DustTrak DRX
Model Number:8533
Serial Number:8533111905
Test ID:2
Test Abbreviation:UPWIND_002
Start Date:4/4/2022
Start Time:7:00:04
Duration (dd:hh:mm:ss):0:05:29:00
Log Interval (mm:ss):1:00
Number of points:329
Notes:
Statistics Channel:PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 TOTAL
Units:mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3
Average:0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.057
Minimum:0.048 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.05
Time of Minimum:12:18:04 12:18:04 10:36:04 12:17:04 12:17:04
Date of Minimum:4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022
Maximum:0.065 0.067 0.068 0.074 0.075
Time of Maximum:7:01:04 7:01:04 7:01:04 8:17:04 8:17:04
Date of Maximum:4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022
Calibration Sensor:AEROSOL
Cal. date 11/18/2021
Date Time PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 PM10 TOTAL
MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 ug/m3 mg/m^3
4/4/2022 7:01:04 0.065 0.067 0.068 0.071 71 0.071
4/4/2022 7:02:04 0.064 0.066 0.067 0.068 68 0.068
4/4/2022 7:03:04 0.064 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 7:04:04 0.064 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 7:05:04 0.063 0.065 0.065 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 7:06:04 0.061 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:07:04 0.06 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:08:04 0.06 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:09:04 0.059 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:10:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:11:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:12:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:13:04 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.065
4/4/2022 7:14:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 7:15:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:16:04 0.06 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:17:04 0.06 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:18:04 0.06 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:19:04 0.06 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:20:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:21:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:22:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:23:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:24:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:25:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:26:04 0.057 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 7:27:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 7:28:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.059
4/4/2022 7:29:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 7:30:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 7:31:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 7:32:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 7:33:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 7:34:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 7:35:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 7:36:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 7:37:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:38:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:39:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:40:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:41:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:42:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:43:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:44:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:45:04 0.06 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:46:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:47:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:48:04 0.059 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:49:04 0.06 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:50:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:51:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:52:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 7:53:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.061
4/4/2022 7:54:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:55:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:56:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 7:57:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 7:58:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 7:59:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:00:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:01:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:02:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:03:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:04:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:05:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:06:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:07:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:08:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:09:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 8:10:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 8:11:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 8:12:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:13:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 8:14:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 8:15:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 8:16:04 0.059 0.061 0.063 0.068 68 0.069
4/4/2022 8:17:04 0.061 0.064 0.067 0.074 74 0.075
4/4/2022 8:18:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:19:04 0.058 0.06 0.061 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 8:20:04 0.057 0.059 0.06 0.062 62 0.063
4/4/2022 8:21:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:22:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:23:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:24:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 8:25:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 8:26:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:27:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:28:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:29:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:30:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:31:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:32:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:33:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:34:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:35:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:36:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:37:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:38:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:39:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:40:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:41:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:42:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:43:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:44:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:45:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:46:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:47:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 8:48:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:49:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:50:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:51:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:52:04 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:53:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:54:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 8:55:04 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 8:56:04 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 8:57:04 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 8:58:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 8:59:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:00:04 0.061 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:01:04 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:02:04 0.061 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:03:04 0.06 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:04:04 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:05:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.061 61 0.062
4/4/2022 9:06:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.062
4/4/2022 9:07:04 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:08:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:09:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:10:04 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:11:04 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:12:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:13:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:14:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:15:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:16:04 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:17:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:18:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:19:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:20:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:21:04 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:22:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:23:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:24:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:25:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:26:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.061
4/4/2022 9:27:04 0.059 0.061 0.062 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:28:04 0.059 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:29:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:30:04 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:31:04 0.059 0.06 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:32:04 0.058 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:33:04 0.058 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:34:04 0.057 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:35:04 0.057 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 9:36:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:37:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 9:38:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 9:39:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 9:40:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 9:41:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:42:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:43:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:44:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:45:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.06
4/4/2022 9:46:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 9:47:04 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:48:04 0.056 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.059
4/4/2022 9:49:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 9:50:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 9:51:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:52:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 9:53:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 9:54:04 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:55:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:56:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 9:57:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.059
4/4/2022 9:58:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 9:59:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:00:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:01:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:02:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:03:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:04:04 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 10:05:04 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:06:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:07:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:08:04 0.055 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:09:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:10:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:11:04 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:12:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:13:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:14:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:15:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:16:04 0.055 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:17:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:18:04 0.054 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:19:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:20:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:21:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:22:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:23:04 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:24:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.056
4/4/2022 10:25:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.056
4/4/2022 10:26:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:27:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:28:04 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:29:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:30:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:31:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:32:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:33:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:34:04 0.049 0.05 0.051 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 10:35:04 0.049 0.05 0.051 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 10:36:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 10:37:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 10:38:04 0.05 0.05 0.051 0.051 51 0.052
4/4/2022 10:39:04 0.05 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 10:40:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:41:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 10:42:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:43:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:44:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.056
4/4/2022 10:45:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.057 57 0.058
4/4/2022 10:46:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:47:04 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.058 58 0.059
4/4/2022 10:48:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:49:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.056 56 0.057
4/4/2022 10:50:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:51:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 10:52:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:53:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:54:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:55:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.055
4/4/2022 10:56:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:57:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:58:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:59:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.056
4/4/2022 11:00:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:01:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:02:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:03:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:04:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.056 56 0.057
4/4/2022 11:05:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:06:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.053
4/4/2022 11:07:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:08:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:09:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.053 53 0.054
4/4/2022 11:10:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:11:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:12:04 0.056 0.057 0.059 0.068 68 0.07
4/4/2022 11:13:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.056 56 0.057
4/4/2022 11:14:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:15:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:16:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:17:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:18:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:19:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:20:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:21:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:22:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:23:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:24:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:25:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:26:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:27:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:28:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:29:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:30:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:31:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:32:04 0.053 0.054 0.055 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:33:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:34:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:35:04 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:36:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:37:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:38:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:39:04 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:40:04 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:41:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:42:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:43:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:44:04 0.05 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:45:04 0.049 0.05 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:46:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.052
4/4/2022 11:47:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 11:48:04 0.05 0.05 0.051 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 11:49:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:50:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:51:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:52:04 0.052 0.054 0.054 0.058 58 0.059
4/4/2022 11:53:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:54:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:55:04 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:56:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:57:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:58:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.052
4/4/2022 11:59:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:00:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 12:01:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 12:02:04 0.05 0.05 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:03:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:04:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:05:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.054 54 0.055
4/4/2022 12:06:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.052
4/4/2022 12:07:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:08:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:09:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:10:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:11:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:12:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:13:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:14:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:15:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:16:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:17:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 0.05
4/4/2022 12:18:04 0.048 0.049 0.05 0.05 50 0.05
4/4/2022 12:19:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:20:04 0.049 0.05 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:21:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.052
4/4/2022 12:22:04 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:23:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 12:24:04 0.05 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:25:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:26:04 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 12:27:04 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:28:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 0.051
4/4/2022 12:29:04 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
TrakPro Version 4.70 ASCII Data File
Model:DustTrak DRX
Model Number:8533
Serial Number:8533142804
Test ID:1
Test Abbreviation:DOWNWIND_001
Start Date:3/28/2022
Start Time:7:02:22
Duration (dd:hh:mm:ss):0:02:44:00
Log Interval (mm:ss):1:00
Number of points:164
Notes:
Statistics Channel:PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 TOTAL
Units:mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3
Average:0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.01
Minimum:0.004 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005
Time of Minimum:9:01:22 9:02:22 9:16:22 8:59:22 9:00:22
Date of Minimum:3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022
Maximum:0.035 0.036 0.04 0.074 0.087
Time of Maximum:7:03:22 7:03:22 7:03:22 7:03:22 7:03:22
Date of Maximum:3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022 3/28/2022
Calibration Sensor:AEROSOL
Cal. date 4/28/2021
Date Time PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 PM10 TOTAL
MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 ug/m^3 mg/m^3
3/28/2022 7:03:22 0.035 0.036 0.04 0.074 74 0.087
3/28/2022 7:04:22 0.023 0.024 0.027 0.039 39 0.042
3/28/2022 7:05:22 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.016 16 0.016
3/28/2022 7:06:22 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 7:07:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 7:08:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 7:09:22 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 7:10:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 7:11:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 7:12:22 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 15 0.015
3/28/2022 7:13:22 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:14:22 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:15:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:16:22 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:17:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:18:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:19:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:20:22 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.015
3/28/2022 7:21:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:22:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:23:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:24:22 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:25:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:26:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:27:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:28:22 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.014 14 0.014
3/28/2022 7:29:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:30:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:31:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:32:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:33:22 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:34:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.013
3/28/2022 7:35:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:36:22 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:37:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:38:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:39:22 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 7:40:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:41:22 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:42:22 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:43:22 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:44:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.013
3/28/2022 7:45:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.013 13 0.013
3/28/2022 7:46:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:47:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:48:22 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:49:22 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:50:22 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 12 0.012
3/28/2022 7:51:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:52:22 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:53:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:54:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:55:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:56:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:57:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 7:58:22 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 7:59:22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 8:00:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:01:22 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 8:02:22 0.009 0.01 0.01 0.011 11 0.011
3/28/2022 8:03:22 0.009 0.009 0.01 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:04:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:05:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:06:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:07:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:08:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:09:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:10:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:11:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:12:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:13:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:14:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:15:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:16:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:17:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:18:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:19:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.011
3/28/2022 8:20:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:21:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:22:22 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:23:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:24:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:25:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:26:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:27:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:28:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:29:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:30:22 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:31:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:32:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:33:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:34:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:35:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:36:22 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:37:22 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.01 10 0.01
3/28/2022 8:38:22 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:39:22 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:40:22 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 9 0.009
3/28/2022 8:41:22 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:42:22 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:43:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:44:22 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 8 0.009
3/28/2022 8:45:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 7 0.007
3/28/2022 8:46:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:47:22 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:48:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:49:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:50:22 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.007 7 0.007
3/28/2022 8:51:22 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:52:22 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:53:22 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 8 0.008
3/28/2022 8:54:22 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 7 0.008
3/28/2022 8:55:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 8:56:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 8:57:22 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 7 0.007
3/28/2022 8:58:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 8:59:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006
3/28/2022 9:00:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:01:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:02:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:03:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:04:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:05:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:06:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:07:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:08:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:09:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:10:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006
3/28/2022 9:11:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:12:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:13:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006
3/28/2022 9:14:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:15:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:16:22 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:17:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:18:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.007
3/28/2022 9:19:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:20:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:21:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006
3/28/2022 9:22:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:23:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:24:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:25:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:26:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:27:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:28:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:29:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:30:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:31:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:32:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:33:22 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:34:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:35:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.006
3/28/2022 9:36:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:37:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:38:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:39:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:40:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:41:22 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:42:22 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:43:22 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:44:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
3/28/2022 9:45:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 5 0.005
3/28/2022 9:46:22 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 6 0.006
Model:DustTrak DRX
Model Number:8533
Serial Number:8533142804
Test ID:2
Test Abbreviation:DOWNWIND_002
Start Date:4/4/2022
Start Time:7:00:05
Duration (dd:hh:mm:ss):0:05:31:00
Log Interval (mm:ss):1:00
Number of points:331
Notes:
Statistics Channel:PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 TOTAL
Units:mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3
Average:0.058 0.058 0.058 0.06 0.06
Minimum:0.046 0.046 0.047 0.047 0.047
Time of Minimum:12:17:05 12:17:05 12:17:05 12:17:05 12:17:05
Date of Minimum:4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022
Maximum:0.078 0.079 0.08 0.091 0.092
Time of Maximum:7:01:05 7:01:05 7:01:05 7:03:05 7:03:05
Date of Maximum:4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022
Calibration Sensor:AEROSOL
Cal. date 4/28/2021
Date Time PM1 PM2.5 RESP PM10 PM10 TOTAL
MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 mg/m^3 ug/m3 mg/m^3
4/4/2022 7:01:05 0.078 0.079 0.08 0.081 81 0.084
4/4/2022 7:02:05 0.072 0.073 0.074 0.077 77 0.078
4/4/2022 7:03:05 0.076 0.077 0.08 0.091 91 0.092
4/4/2022 7:04:05 0.069 0.07 0.07 0.072 72 0.072
4/4/2022 7:05:05 0.068 0.069 0.07 0.071 71 0.071
4/4/2022 7:06:05 0.066 0.067 0.067 0.068 68 0.068
4/4/2022 7:07:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 7:08:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 7:09:05 0.064 0.065 0.065 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 7:10:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 7:11:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:12:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:13:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:14:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:15:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.062
4/4/2022 7:16:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:17:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:18:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:19:05 0.067 0.068 0.068 0.069 69 0.069
4/4/2022 7:20:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:21:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:22:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:23:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:24:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:25:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:26:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:27:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:28:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 7:29:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 7:30:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:31:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:32:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 7:33:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 7:34:05 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:35:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:36:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:37:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:38:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 7:39:05 0.065 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 7:40:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 7:41:05 0.065 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 7:42:05 0.064 0.065 0.065 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 7:43:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 7:44:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 7:45:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:46:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:47:05 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:48:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 7:49:05 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:50:05 0.064 0.065 0.066 0.068 68 0.069
4/4/2022 7:51:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.067 67 0.068
4/4/2022 7:52:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:53:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:54:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:55:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 7:56:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 7:57:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 7:58:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 7:59:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.063 63 0.064
4/4/2022 8:00:05 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 8:01:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 8:02:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 8:03:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 8:04:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 8:05:05 0.066 0.067 0.068 0.069 69 0.069
4/4/2022 8:06:05 0.063 0.064 0.065 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 8:07:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 8:08:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:09:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:10:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:11:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 8:12:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:13:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:14:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:15:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:16:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:17:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:18:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:19:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:20:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:21:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:22:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:23:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:24:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.062 62 0.063
4/4/2022 8:25:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:26:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 8:27:05 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 8:28:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:29:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 8:30:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.061
4/4/2022 8:31:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:32:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:33:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:34:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:35:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:36:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:37:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:38:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:39:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:40:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:41:05 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:42:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:43:05 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:44:05 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.058 58 0.059
4/4/2022 8:45:05 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:46:05 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 8:47:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.06
4/4/2022 8:48:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:49:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 8:50:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:51:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 8:52:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 8:53:05 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 8:54:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 8:55:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 8:56:05 0.066 0.067 0.067 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 8:57:05 0.066 0.066 0.066 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 8:58:05 0.066 0.066 0.067 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 8:59:05 0.067 0.067 0.067 0.068 68 0.068
4/4/2022 9:00:05 0.066 0.067 0.067 0.068 68 0.068
4/4/2022 9:01:05 0.066 0.066 0.067 0.069 69 0.069
4/4/2022 9:02:05 0.065 0.065 0.065 0.066 66 0.067
4/4/2022 9:03:05 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 9:04:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:05:05 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:06:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:07:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.065 65 0.066
4/4/2022 9:08:05 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:09:05 0.064 0.064 0.065 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:10:05 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:11:05 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:12:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:13:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:14:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:15:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:16:05 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:17:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:18:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.066 66 0.066
4/4/2022 9:19:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:20:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:21:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:22:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:23:05 0.063 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:24:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:25:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:26:05 0.062 0.063 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:27:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:28:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.065
4/4/2022 9:29:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.064 64 0.065
4/4/2022 9:30:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:31:05 0.064 0.065 0.065 0.067 67 0.067
4/4/2022 9:32:05 0.063 0.064 0.064 0.065 65 0.065
4/4/2022 9:33:05 0.063 0.063 0.064 0.065 65 0.066
4/4/2022 9:34:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:35:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:36:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:37:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:38:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:39:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:40:05 0.062 0.062 0.063 0.064 64 0.064
4/4/2022 9:41:05 0.061 0.062 0.062 0.063 63 0.063
4/4/2022 9:42:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:43:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:44:05 0.061 0.061 0.062 0.062 62 0.063
4/4/2022 9:45:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:46:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:47:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.063
4/4/2022 9:48:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:49:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:50:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:51:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:52:05 0.06 0.06 0.061 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 9:53:05 0.06 0.061 0.061 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 9:54:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:55:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:56:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:57:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:58:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 9:59:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.06
4/4/2022 10:00:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:01:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:02:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 10:03:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 10:04:05 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:05:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 10:06:05 0.059 0.06 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:07:05 0.059 0.059 0.06 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:08:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:09:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 10:10:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:11:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:12:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:13:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:14:05 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.059 59 0.06
4/4/2022 10:15:05 0.057 0.057 0.058 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:16:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:17:05 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:18:05 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.06 60 0.06
4/4/2022 10:19:05 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.061 61 0.061
4/4/2022 10:20:05 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 10:21:05 0.057 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:22:05 0.057 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 10:23:05 0.057 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.059
4/4/2022 10:24:05 0.057 0.057 0.058 0.059 59 0.06
4/4/2022 10:25:05 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:26:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:27:05 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:28:05 0.056 0.056 0.057 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:29:05 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:30:05 0.056 0.057 0.057 0.06 60 0.061
4/4/2022 10:31:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 10:32:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:33:05 0.062 0.063 0.065 0.081 81 0.084
4/4/2022 10:34:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.062 62 0.063
4/4/2022 10:35:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:36:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:37:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:38:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:39:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 10:40:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:41:05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.062 62 0.062
4/4/2022 10:42:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:43:05 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:44:05 0.055 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:45:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.058 58 0.058
4/4/2022 10:46:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:47:05 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 10:48:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.055
4/4/2022 10:49:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:50:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.055
4/4/2022 10:51:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:52:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.06 60 0.061
4/4/2022 10:53:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 10:54:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:55:05 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:56:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:57:05 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 10:58:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.06 60 0.061
4/4/2022 10:59:05 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.059 59 0.06
4/4/2022 11:00:05 0.058 0.059 0.059 0.063 63 0.064
4/4/2022 11:01:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:02:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.056
4/4/2022 11:03:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:04:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:05:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:06:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 11:07:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:08:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:09:05 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:10:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:11:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:12:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:13:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:14:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:15:05 0.059 0.06 0.062 0.07 70 0.07
4/4/2022 11:16:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:17:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:18:05 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.056
4/4/2022 11:19:05 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:20:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:21:05 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:22:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:23:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:24:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:25:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.055
4/4/2022 11:26:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:27:05 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:28:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:29:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:30:05 0.052 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:31:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:32:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:33:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:34:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:35:05 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 11:36:05 0.053 0.053 0.054 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:37:05 0.054 0.054 0.055 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:38:05 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:39:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.054 54 0.054
4/4/2022 11:40:05 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.062 62 0.064
4/4/2022 11:41:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.057 57 0.057
4/4/2022 11:42:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:43:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.053
4/4/2022 11:44:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:45:05 0.052 0.052 0.053 0.056 56 0.056
4/4/2022 11:46:05 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.053
4/4/2022 11:47:05 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:48:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:49:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:50:05 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:51:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:52:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:53:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:54:05 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:55:05 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 11:56:05 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:57:05 0.05 0.05 0.051 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 11:58:05 0.05 0.051 0.051 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 11:59:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:00:05 0.053 0.054 0.054 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 12:01:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:02:05 0.047 0.048 0.048 0.049 49 0.049
4/4/2022 12:03:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 12:04:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.053 53 0.054
4/4/2022 12:05:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:06:05 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.05 50 0.05
4/4/2022 12:07:05 0.047 0.047 0.048 0.048 48 0.049
4/4/2022 12:08:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 12:09:05 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.061 61 0.062
4/4/2022 12:10:05 0.052 0.053 0.054 0.06 60 0.061
4/4/2022 12:11:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:12:05 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 49 0.049
4/4/2022 12:13:05 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.049 49 0.049
4/4/2022 12:14:05 0.051 0.051 0.052 0.058 58 0.06
4/4/2022 12:15:05 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.05 50 0.05
4/4/2022 12:16:05 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 49 0.049
4/4/2022 12:17:05 0.046 0.046 0.047 0.047 47 0.047
4/4/2022 12:18:05 0.046 0.047 0.047 0.048 48 0.048
4/4/2022 12:19:05 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.048 48 0.048
4/4/2022 12:20:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.053 53 0.053
4/4/2022 12:21:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:22:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:23:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.051 51 0.051
4/4/2022 12:24:05 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.05 50 0.05
4/4/2022 12:25:05 0.049 0.049 0.05 0.05 50 0.051
4/4/2022 12:26:05 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.05 50 0.05
4/4/2022 12:27:05 0.05 0.051 0.052 0.055 55 0.055
4/4/2022 12:28:05 0.049 0.05 0.05 0.052 52 0.052
4/4/2022 12:29:05 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.05 50 0.05
4/4/2022 12:30:05 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.05 50 0.05
4/4/2022 12:31:05 0.053 0.053 0.055 0.063 63 0.065
APPENDIX C WASTE DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION
Date Manifest/Additional Documents Ticket #Material Facility Carrier Material Quantity Material Unit
4/4/2022 652136CA 220781 1236561 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 24.89 24.89 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220778 1236563 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.76 25.76 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220779 1236568 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.58 25.58 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220777 1236572 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 27.51 27.51 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220780 1236576 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 26.86 26.86 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220752 1236626 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.49 25.49 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220753 1236629 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 24.83 24.83 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220754 1236630 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.69 25.69 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220755 1236638 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 28.15 28.15 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220756 1236658 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 26.07 26.07 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220757 1236713 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 26.54 26.54 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220759 1236731 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.64 25.64 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220758 1236734 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.94 25.94 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220760 1236744 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 28.08 28.08 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220761 1236754 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 26.41 26.41 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220762 1236781 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.1 25.1 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220763 1236788 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 25.78 25.78 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220764 1236797 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 24.91 24.91 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220765 1236801 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 24.67 24.67 TON
4/4/2022 652136CA 220766 1236817 Unspecified Special Final Cover material PMT RGC Azusa Landfill 22.42 22.42 TON
516.32 516.32 TON
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236561
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier ARRIAGAS TRANSPORT
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 177 Volume 12.0
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G18207
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220781 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 80400 lb
In 04/04/2022 08:15:10 1 jarebalo Tare 30620 lb*
Out 04/04/2022 08:16:03 1 jarebalo Net 49780 lb
* Manual Weight Tons 24.89
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 24.89 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236563
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier RICHARD PANIAGUA
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 203 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F94906
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220778 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 83320 lb
In 04/04/2022 08:17:45 2 jholstad Tare 31800 lb
Out 04/04/2022 08:17:45 jholstad Net 51520 lb
Tons 25.76
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.76 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236568
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier DA TRUCKING INC
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 1 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F89944
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220779 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82000 lb
In 04/04/2022 08:21:52 Scale 3 rlegazpi Tare 30840 lb
Out 04/04/2022 08:21:52 rlegazpi Net 51160 lb
Tons 25.58
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.58 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236572
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier MT TRANSPORT
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 001 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G06555
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220777 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 84200 lb
In 04/04/2022 08:29:06 2 jholstad Tare 29180 lb
Out 04/04/2022 08:29:06 jholstad Net 55020 lb
Tons 27.51
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 27.51 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236576
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier VIGLER
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 02 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: YP05078
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220780 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 85340 lb
In 04/04/2022 08:32:20 2 jholstad Tare 31620 lb
Out 04/04/2022 08:53:10 Scale 3 rlegazpi Net 53720 lb
Tons 26.86
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 26.86 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236626
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier RICHARD PANIAGUA
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 203 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F94906
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220752 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82780 lb
In 04/04/2022 09:43:39 2 JAREBALO Tare 31800 lb
Out 04/04/2022 09:43:39 JAREBALO Net 50980 lb
Tons 25.49
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.49 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236629
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier ARRIAGAS TRANSPORT
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 177 Volume 12.0
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G18207
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220753 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 80280 lb
In 04/04/2022 09:47:28 2 JAREBALO Tare 30620 lb
Out 04/04/2022 09:47:28 JAREBALO Net 49660 lb
Tons 24.83
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 24.83 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236630
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier DA TRUCKING INC
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 1 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F89944
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220754 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82220 lb
In 04/04/2022 09:49:56 1 jarebalo Tare 30840 lb
Out 04/04/2022 09:49:56 jarebalo Net 51380 lb
Tons 25.69
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.69 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236638
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier MT TRANSPORT
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 001 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G06555
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220755 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 85480 lb
In 04/04/2022 09:57:49 2 JAREBALO Tare 29180 lb
Out 04/04/2022 09:57:49 JAREBALO Net 56300 lb
Tons 28.15
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 28.15 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236658
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier VIGLER
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 02 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: YP05078
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220756 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 83760 lb
In 04/04/2022 10:16:34 1 jarebalo Tare 31620 lb
Out 04/04/2022 10:16:34 jarebalo Net 52140 lb
Tons 26.07
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 26.07 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236713
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier RICHARD PANIAGUA
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 203 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F94906
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220757 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 84880 lb
In 04/04/2022 11:07:29 Scale 3 rlegazpi Tare 31800 lb
Out 04/04/2022 11:07:29 rlegazpi Net 53080 lb
Tons 26.54
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 26.54 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236731
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier DA TRUCKING INC
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 1 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F89944
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220759 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82120 lb
In 04/04/2022 11:18:02 Scale 3 rlegazpi Tare 30840 lb
Out 04/04/2022 11:18:02 rlegazpi Net 51280 lb
Tons 25.64
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.64 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236734
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier ARRIAGAS TRANSPORT
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 177 Volume 12.0
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G18207
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220758 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82500 lb
In 04/04/2022 11:20:31 1 JAREBALO Tare 30620 lb
Out 04/04/2022 11:20:31 JAREBALO Net 51880 lb
Tons 25.94
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.94 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236744
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier MT TRANSPORT
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 001 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G06555
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220760 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 85340 lb
In 04/04/2022 11:28:05 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 29180 lb
Out 04/04/2022 11:28:05 JHOLSTAD Net 56160 lb
Tons 28.08
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 28.08 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236754
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier VIGLER
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 02 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: YP05078
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220761 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 84440 lb
In 04/04/2022 11:36:26 Scale 3 rlegazpi Tare 31620 lb
Out 04/04/2022 11:36:26 rlegazpi Net 52820 lb
Tons 26.41
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 26.41 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236781
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier RICHARD PANIAGUA
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 203 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F94906
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220762 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82000 lb
In 04/04/2022 12:25:23 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 31800 lb
Out 04/04/2022 12:25:23 JHOLSTAD Net 50200 lb
Tons 25.10
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.10 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236788
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier DA TRUCKING INC
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 1 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9F89944
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220763 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 82400 lb
In 04/04/2022 12:38:12 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 30840 lb
Out 04/04/2022 12:38:12 JHOLSTAD Net 51560 lb
Tons 25.78
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 25.78 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236797
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier ARRIAGAS TRANSPORT
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 177 Volume 12.0
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G18207
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220764 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 80440 lb
In 04/04/2022 12:48:46 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 30620 lb
Out 04/04/2022 12:48:46 JHOLSTAD Net 49820 lb
Tons 24.91
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 24.91 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236801
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier MT TRANSPORT
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 001 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: 9G06555
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220765 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 78520 lb
In 04/04/2022 12:57:05 2 JHOLSTAD Tare 29180 lb
Out 04/04/2022 12:57:05 JHOLSTAD Net 49340 lb
Tons 24.67
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 24.67 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
Azusa Land Reclamation Reprint
1211 W. Gladstone St. Ticket# 1236817
Azusa, CA, 91702 Ph: 626-224-9127
Customer Name BDCONSTRUCTION 357 B AND D CO Carrier VIGLER
Ticket Date 04/04/2022 Vehicle# 02 Volume
Payment Type Credit Account VehicleLicense: YP05078
Manual Ticket# Container
Hauling Ticket# Check#
Manifest 0220766 Billing# 0001782
Generator 144-MISSIONVIL ROSEMEAD 8601 MI PO# 951
Profile 652136CA (NON HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLID
Time Scale Operator Inbound Gross 76460 lb
In 04/04/2022 13:12:56 Scale 3 RLEGAZPI Tare 31620 lb
Out 04/04/2022 13:12:56 RLEGAZPI Net 44840 lb
Tons 22.42
Comments
Product LD% Qty UOM Rate Tax Amount Origin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 DCLN-TONS-Unspecified Sp 100 22.42 Tons Rosemead
2 ENVFEE-ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 100 % Rosemead
Total Tax
Total Ticket
Driver`s Signature
1
PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 83705
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Project Address:
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Prepared For:
Mission Villas, LLC.
Attn: Mitch Gardner
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820
Los Angeles, CA 90025
(310) 582-1991
Prepared By:
C&V Consulting Inc.
9830 Irvine Center Dr.
Irvine, CA 92618
Ryan Bittner, P.E.
Contact: Marco Midence
Project Manager
(949) 916-3800
Prepared:
February 2022
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION: 4
2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY: 4
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS: 4
4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: 4
5.0 METHODOLOGY: 5
6.0 RESULTS: 6
7.0 CONCLUSIONS: 7
8.0 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: 7
9.0 REFERENCES: 7
APPENDIX A: Hydrology Maps
Existing Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map
Proposed Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map
APPENDIX B: Hydrology Calculations
Existing Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25-year, 50-year, & 100-year Storm Events)
Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25-year, 50-year, & 100-year Storm Events)
Off-site Hydrology Calculations (25-year, 50-year, & 100-year Storm Events)
APPENDIX C: Isohyet Map
APPENDIX D: Hydraulic Calculations
APPENDIX E: As-Builts & References
3
Preliminary Hydrology Study
for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83705
Mission Villas Rosemead
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE PAGE
This Preliminary Hydrology Study was prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc. under the supervision of
Ryan J. Bittner, P.E.
___________________________________ ____________
Ryan J. Bittner, R.C.E. 68167 Date
Principal, C&V Consulting, Inc.
4
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION:
The proposed development encompasses three (3) parcels consisting of approximately 3.44 gross acres
and 3.38 net acres. The site is bounded by existing residential lots to the north and the east, Mission
Drive to the south, and power lines owned by Southern California Edison to the west.
2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY:
The preliminary hydrology study will determine the amount of stormwater runoff generated from the
project site in the existing and proposed conditions. This study will anticipate whether detention or
other peak flow mitigation methods will be required by comparing the proposed and existing condition
peak flow rates for the 25, 50 and 100-year storm events.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS:
All three parcels are currently a vacant lot. Besides two small service roads in southern and eastern
portions of the site the site is all pervious coverage. The site is surrounded by alternating masonry block
wall, wooden fence, and chain link fence around the entire property. There is existing public sidewalk
and driveway entrances along Mission Drive. There are no existing storm drain facilities located on the
site and no storm drain facilities located in the adjacent portion of Mission Drive along the project
frontage.
The existing drainage pattern of the site consists of one drainage area labeled XA1 on the Pre-Existing
condition hydrology map located in Appendix A. The entire site sheet flows over the vacant land in a
southerly direction. Stormwater appears to simply sheet flow over existing driveway entrances and
enters Mission Road. Once stormwater enters Mission Rd. it flows in a southeasterly direction and
enters a Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) owned catch basin approximately 500’
downstream of our site. This catch basin is connected to a LACFCD 30” RCP (LACFCD Project RDD
250) which flows into the Eaton Wash channel then into the Rio Hondo Channel. The Rio Hondo
Channel then connects to the Los Angeles River then ultimately the Pacific Ocean. The existing area
was determined to be 98.5% pervious based on the ALTA/Topographic Survey prepared by C&V
Consulting, Inc. dated October 2021.
Since all the existing onsite stormwater runoff ultimately reaches one location, the existing site was
analyzed as one drainage area (XA1) to approximately quantify the runoff based on the longest
hydraulic path from the most remote high point to low point.
Refer to the “Existing Conditions Hydrology Map” located within Appendix A of this study for more
information.
4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS:
The proposed project consists of 8 duplex units and 29 single family homes over approximately 3.38
acres. The proposed development includes drive aisles, parking, landscaping, walkways, patios, and
common open space areas. The site will be graded to collect runoff at one low point to control the
amount of imported fill during grading and maintaining the existing site drainage pattern. The proposed
development will utilize onsite catch basins, infiltration systems, and a detention pipe system to capture
and treat stormwater. Stormwater up to the design capture volume will be infiltrated by a proposed
onsite drywell system.
5
Stormwater runoff will be conveyed via proposed onsite gutter and directed to one sump area equipped
with a curb inlet catch basin. There will be two additional catch basins located along the site’s main
spine in flow by conditions to convey stormwater into the underground storm drain system. The sump
catch basin will be located at the end of the drive aisle at the southern property line. All on-site catch
basins will be connected by storm drain pipe to the drywell infiltration system for water quality
treatment. During larger storm events, stormwater runoff will back up the drywell system which is
connected to the underground detention system. Larger storm events will bypass the infiltration system
and overflow into a proposed grate inlet catch basin which is attached to a parkway culvert. Once
stormwater enters the parkway culvert it will drain into Mission Road and follow the existing drainage
pattern. For emergency overflow, runoff will spill out of the proposed curb inlet catch basin, topple
over the proposed driveway entrance, and sheet flow into Mission Road. Refer to separately prepared
Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans for site design information.
In an event where the proposed onsite storm drain system is at its full capacity or clogged, stormwater
will pond up at the lowest proposed onsite sump area and excess stormwater will top over the grade
break at the site’s entrance and continue to flow out through proposed driveway and into Mission Rd.
During final engineering, water surface elevation will be analyzed and provided to verify all habitable
structures will have at least a 1 foot of freeboard during the 100-year storm event.
According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), FIRM rate map Number
06037C1675F, revised September 26, 2008, the site is located within the flood zone as follows: Zone
X – “Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain”
The “Proposed Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map” is included in Appendix A for reference.
5.0 METHODOLOGY:
The site was analyzed using the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual.
The initial subarea was analyzed for acreage, land-use, soil type, peak flow rate and time of
concentration according to the Rational Method described in the manual.
In this preliminary hydrology study, the proposed condition impervious area percentage values were
conservative estimation from the LA County Hydrology Manual. During final engineering, impervious
areas will be calculated in more detail to refine all peak flow rates.
In accordance with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual all
habitable structures must have a finished floor elevation to allow 1 ft of freeboard during the 100-year
storm event. Catch basin, pipe sizing and 100-year water surface elevation calculations will be provided
during final engineering.
6
6.0 RESULTS:
Hydrology Summary
Pre-Developed Hydrology Summary
Area ID
Total
Area
(AC)
Pervious
Area
(AC)
Pervious
(%)
Impervious
Area (AC)
Impervious
(%)
Q25
(CFS)
Q50
(CFS)
Q100
(CFS)
XA1 3.38 3.33 98.5% 0.05 1.5% 7.21 9.08 11.27
Post-Developed Hydrology Summary
Area ID
Total
Area
(AC)
Pervious
Area
(AC)
Pervious
(%)
Impervious
Area (AC)
Impervious
(%)
Q25
(CFS)
Q50
(CFS)
Q100
(CFS)
A1 3.38 0.47 14.0% 2.91 86.0% 7.97 9.65 10.87
Percent Decrease:
∆25-year peak storm flow = 7.97/7.21 = increase of 10.5%
∆50-year peak storm flow = 9.65/9.08 = increase of 6.3%
∆100-year peak storm flow = 10.87/11.27 = decrease of 3.5%
Refer to Appendix A & B of this report for additional information shown in the LACDPW HydroCalc
output data, as well as the pre-developed and post-developed hydrology maps.
Detention Sizing
Compared to the existing condition the proposed development will, on average, match the existing
condition. As there is a net change in overall storm event volume, detention may be required to mitigate
the proposed condition peak flow rates. However, detention is required for the on-site infiltration
system. This system will be designed to allow the retention of the entire Stormwater Quality Design
Volume (SWQDCv) of 8,630 CF. This retention volume will offset any increase in peak flow from the
proposed development. The detention system will utilize Bioclean’s Urbanpond Detention system and
sizing calculations can be found in the separately prepared Preliminary LID Report.
Catch Basin Sizing
Catch basin Sizing will be analyzed for the 50-year storm event peak flow rates and will be provided
during final engineering.
Pipe Sizing
Pipe Sizing will be analyzed using WSPG software to verify hydraulic grade line (HGL) based on the
100-year storm event peak flow rates and will be provided during final engineering for proposed onsite
conveyance pipe.
100-Year Water Surface Elevations
Water surface elevations for the 100-year storm event peak flow rates will verify that the proposed
finish floor elevations are set at least 1’ above the water surface elevation and will be calculated and
provided during final engineering.
7
7.0 CONCLUSIONS:
The results from this preliminary hydrology study utilizing Los Angeles County Department of Public
Works Hydrology Manual demonstrate that the proposed condition peak flow rates compared to the
existing condition peak flow will stay the same as indicated in the hydrology summary results in
Section 6 of this report. This is mainly due to change in grading and elongation of the proposed
condition’s flow path. During final engineering, impervious area for proposed conditions will be
calculated in more detail based on the finalized landscape plan. The proposed peak flow rates will be
re-evaluated to reflect the actual proposed conditions. However, the proposed development is likely to
generate lower peak flows.
The proposed development will be graded to allow for one low point on the site equipped with a curb
inlet catch basin, this catch basin will be connected to the drywell infiltration system for treatment. The
storm drain system will also have detention system to retain the entire SWQDCv. In the event the storm
drain system becomes clogged, the proposed grading will facilitate emergency overflow by ponding at
the grate inlet catch basin, toppling over the curb and sheet flow into the Mission Rd.
8.0 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS:
1. The property is in the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County rainfall region.
2. 100-year storm event flood level protection analysis required for habitable structures per the
requirements of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual
3. According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual 50-Year
24-Hour Isohyet Map 1-H1.20, the drainage area is in Soil Group 006, the site receives 6.7 inches
of rainfall over a 24-Hr storm (Q50).
4. The LACDPW HydroCalc was utilized to determine the time of concentration, run-off flow rate
and run-off volume for site.
5. The site was analyzed for a 25, 50 and 100-year storm events per the requirements of the January
2006 Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Hydrology Manual. The Rational Method
Analysis was performed, and the appropriate calculations are provided herein.
6. The existing project site is currently a vacant lot that is 98.5% pervious based on the aerial survey
performed by C&V Consulting, Inc.
7. The proposed site was assumed to be approximately 86% based on the LACDPW Hydrology
Manual for “Low-Rise Apartments, Condominiums, and Townhouses” land use type.
9.0 REFERENCES:
1. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, “Hydrology Manual”, January 2006.
2. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, “HydroCalc” Outputs and Data
3. Hydraflow Express Extensions for Civil 3D 2021.
8
4. Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan for this project by C&V Consulting, Inc. February 2022
APPENDIX A
HYDROLOGY MAPS
Existing Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map
LEGEND:Pre-Developed Hydroligic SummaryArea IDTotal Area(AC)PerviousArea (AC)Pervious(%)ImperviousArea (AC)Impervious(%)Q25 (CFS)Q50 (CFS)Q100 (CFS)XA13.383.3398.48%0.051.52%7.219.0811.27
Proposed Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map
MM//
//
//
//
//
//
////////
//
//LEGEND:Post-Developed Hydroligic SummaryArea IDTotal Area(AC)PerviousArea (AC)Pervious(%)ImperviousArea (AC)Impervious(%)Q25 (CFS)Q50 (CFS)Q100 (CFS)A13.380.4714.00%2.9186.00%7.979.6510.87
APPENDIX B
HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS
Existing Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25, 50, &
100-year Storm Events)
Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis
File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - XA1 - 25yr.pdf
Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3
Input Parameters
Project Name BORS-003
Subarea ID XA1
Area (ac)3.38
Flow Path Length (ft)705.0
Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.01
50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7
Percent Impervious 0.02
Soil Type 6
Design Storm Frequency 25-yr
Fire Factor 0
LID False
Output Results
Modeled (25-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)5.8826
Peak Intensity (in/hr)2.6625
Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.7986
Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8006
Time of Concentration (min)9.0
Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)7.205
Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)7.205
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.3725
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)16223.9942
Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis
File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - XA1 - 50yr.pdf
Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3
Input Parameters
Project Name BORS-003
Subarea ID XA1
Area (ac)3.38
Flow Path Length (ft)705.0
Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.01
50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7
Percent Impervious 0.02
Soil Type 6
Design Storm Frequency 50-yr
Fire Factor 0
LID False
Output Results
Modeled (50-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)6.7
Peak Intensity (in/hr)3.2051
Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.8367
Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8379
Time of Concentration (min)8.0
Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)9.0777
Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)9.0777
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.4585
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)19970.4404
Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis
File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - XA1 - 100yr.pdf
Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3
Input Parameters
Project Name BORS-003
Subarea ID XA1
Area (ac)3.38
Flow Path Length (ft)705.0
Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.01
50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7
Percent Impervious 0.02
Soil Type 6
Design Storm Frequency 100-yr
Fire Factor 0
LID False
Output Results
Modeled (100-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)7.5174
Peak Intensity (in/hr)3.829
Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.87
Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8706
Time of Concentration (min)7.0
Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)11.2669
Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)11.2669
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.5535
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)24109.2086
Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25, 50, &
100-year Storm Events)
Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis
File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - A1 - 25yr.pdf
Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3
Input Parameters
Project Name BORS-003
Subarea ID A1
Area (ac)3.38
Flow Path Length (ft)714.0
Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009
50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7
Percent Impervious 0.86
Soil Type 6
Design Storm Frequency 25-yr
Fire Factor 0
LID False
Output Results
Modeled (25-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)5.8826
Peak Intensity (in/hr)2.6625
Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.7986
Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8858
Time of Concentration (min)9.0
Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)7.9716
Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)7.9716
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)1.3208
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)57536.2233
Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis
File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - A1 - 50yr.pdf
Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3
Input Parameters
Project Name BORS-003
Subarea ID A1
Area (ac)3.38
Flow Path Length (ft)714.0
Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009
50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7
Percent Impervious 0.86
Soil Type 6
Design Storm Frequency 50-yr
Fire Factor 0
LID False
Output Results
Modeled (50-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)6.7
Peak Intensity (in/hr)3.2051
Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.8367
Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8911
Time of Concentration (min)8.0
Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)9.6539
Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)9.6539
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)1.5093
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)65744.1478
Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis
File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/Hydrology/Hydrology/Preliminary/Appendix B - Hydrology Calculations (Hydro Calc)/BORS-003 - A1 - 100yr.pdf
Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3
Input Parameters
Project Name BORS-003
Subarea ID A1
Area (ac)3.38
Flow Path Length (ft)714.0
Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009
50-yr Rainfall Depth (in)6.7
Percent Impervious 0.86
Soil Type 6
Design Storm Frequency 100-yr
Fire Factor 0
LID False
Output Results
Modeled (100-yr) Rainfall Depth (in)7.5174
Peak Intensity (in/hr)3.5961
Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.8611
Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.8945
Time of Concentration (min)8.0
Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)10.8731
Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)10.8731
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)1.6989
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)74006.0329
APPENDIX C
Isohyet
APPENDIX D
Hydraulic Calculations
To be provided during Final Engineering
APPENDIX E
As-builts & References
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 1
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page I
PRELIMINARY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(LID)
Prepared for:
Mission Villas, LLC
Attention: Mitch Gardner
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Property:
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
APN: 5389-009-029, 5389-009-030, 5389-009-031
Prepared by:
C&V Consulting, Inc.
9830 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, California 92618
(949) 916-3800
Contact: Mr. Ryan Bittner, P.E.
Preparation Date:
February 2022
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 1
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page II
Receipt of WDID
REPLACE THIS SHEET
To be provided prior to final approval
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 1
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page III
Notice of Intent
REPLACE THIS SHEET
To be provided prior to final approval
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 1
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page IV
Table of Contents
SECTION PAGE
SECTION 1
COVER ............................................................................................................................................................................ I
RECEIPT OF WDID ........................................................................................................................................................ II
NOTICE OF INTENT ....................................................................................................................................................... III
PROJECT OWNER’S CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................................................... V
ENGINEER CERTIFICATION .......................................................................................................................................... VI
SECTION 2 ................................................................................................................................................... 1
A.Contact Information/List of Responsible Parties .............................................................................................. 1
SECTION 3 ................................................................................................................................................... 2
A.References ................................................................................................................................................... 2
SECTION 4 – BODY OF LID PLAN ............................................................................................................. 3
A.Objectives.................................................................................................................................................... 3
B.Project Background and Description .............................................................................................................. 3
C.Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................................... 3
D.Pre-Development Drainage Condition ............................................................................................................ 3
E.Post-Development Drainage Condition .......................................................................................................... 5
F.LID Project Types, Characteristics, & Activities ............................................................................................. 5
G.Pollutant Source Identification and BMP Selection ......................................................................................... 6
H.Source Control BMPs ................................................................................................................................... 6
I.Non-Structural BMPs ................................................................................................................................... 10
J.BMP Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair .................................................................................................... 11
K.Inspection, Maintenance, and Responsibility for BMPs ................................................................................. 12
L.Operation/Maintenance Funding after Project Completion ............................................................................. 14
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2: DMP Exhibit
Figure 3: Impaired Waters
List of Appendices
Appendix A: Volume and Flow Rate Calculations and Hydraulic Report
Appendix B: Site BMPs
Appendix C: Drywell System Information and Sizing
Appendix D: “NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO OCEAN” Stencil Examples
Appendix E: Catch Basin Cleaning
Appendix F: General Education Materials
Appendix G: Operations and Maintenance plan
Appendix H: Geotechnical Report
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 1
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page V
Project Owner’s Certification
of the
Preliminary Low Impact Development (LID) Plan
Project Name: Mission Villas Rosemead
Project Number: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83705
APN: 5389-009-029, 5389-009-030, 5389-009-031
Project Address: 8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
This Preliminary Low Impact Development (LID) Plan for the Mission Villas Rosemead (VTTM
No. 83705) project has been prepared for Mission Villas, LLC by C&V Consulting, Inc. It is
intended to comply with the requirements of the City of Rosemead’s Conditions of Approval.
The undersigned is authorized to approve implementation of provisions of this plan as
appropriate and will strive to have the plan carried out by successors consistent with the County
of Los Angeles LID Manual and the intent of the NPDES storm water requirements.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
jurisdiction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathered the
information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information submitted is true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.”
Owner’s Name: Erik Pfahler
Owner’s Title: Senior Vice President
Company: Mission Villas, LLC
Address: 11766 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90025
Email: erik@borsteinenterprises.com
Telephone No.: (310) 582-1991 x203
Signature: Date:
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 1
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page VI
Engineer Certification
Engineer’s Name: Ryan J. Bittner
Engineer’s Title: Principal
Company: C&V Consulting, Inc.
Address: 9830 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92618
Email: rbittner@cvc-inc.net
Telephone No. (949) 916-3800
I hereby certify that this Low Impact Development Plan is in compliance with, and meets the
requirements set forth in, Order No. R4-2012-0175, of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality
Control Board.
Engineer’s Signature Date
Place Stamp Here
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 2
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 1
Section 2
A. Contact Information/List of Responsible Parties
The homeowner’s association (HOA) contact information is:
Contact: TBD
Phone: TBD
The Homeowner’s Association
The HOA shall have primary responsibility and significant authority for the implementation,
maintenance, and inspection of the property Best Management Practices (BMPs). Duties
include, but are not limited to:
Implementing all elements of the Low Impact Development Plan, including but not
limited to:
o Implementation of prompt and effective erosion and sediment control measures
o Implementing all non-storm water management, and materials and waste
management activities, such as: monitoring, discharges, general site clean-up;
vehicle and equipment cleaning, spill control; ensuring that nothing other than
storm water enters the storm drain system, etc.
Pre-storm inspections
Storm event inspections
Post-storm inspections
Routine inspections as described in the Low Impact Development Plan
Ensuring elimination of all unauthorized discharges
The HOA shall be assigned authority to mobilize crews to make immediate repairs to the
control measures.
Coordinate all the necessary corrections/repairs are made immediately, and that the
project always complies with the Low Impact Development Plan.
Managing and report any Illicit Connections or Illegal Discharges.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 3
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 2
Section 3
A. References
The following documents are made a part of this Low Impact Development Plan by reference:
Project plans and specifications for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 83705, prepared by C&V
Consulting, Inc.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 2013-0001-DWQ, February
5, 2013.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No.
CAS000002, Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for Discharges of Storm Water
Runoff Associated with Construction Activity.
California Stormwater BMP Handbook – Construction, November 2009.
California Stormwater BMP Handbook – New Development and Redevelopment,
January 2003.
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works L.I.D. Standards Manual, February
2014
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 3
Section 4 – Body of LID Plan
A. Objectives
This Low Impact Development (LID) Plan has four main objectives:
1) Identify all pollutant sources, including sources of sediment that may affect the quality of
storm water discharges associated with daily use / activity (storm water discharges) from the
property site.
2) Identify non-storm water discharges.
3) Identify, construct, implement and maintain Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce or
eliminate pollutants in storm water discharges and authorized non-storm water discharges
from the property site.
4) Develop a maintenance schedule for BMPs designed to reduce or eliminate pollutants.
B. Project Background and Description
The proposed project is in Rosemead, California is approximately 3.38 net acres. The proposed
development intends to construct 4 buildings of 8 attached 2-story duplex units as well as 29 2-
story single family homes. These homes have private garages, private drive aisles, private yards,
sidewalks, and common landscaped areas. The residential project site will be accessible with one
(1) entrance/ exit along Mission Road. In the existing condition there is no cross-lot drainage as
the existing residential lots have various perimeter controls surrounding them. In the proposed
condition a new CMU wall will be built and therefore off-site run-on is not of concern.
The pre-development conditions of the project site consist of a vacant lot covered by vegetation.
Impervious cover of the pre-developed condition was determined to be 1.5% and pervious cover
to be 98.5% by utilizing Topographic information. For this preliminary study, post-development
impervious cover was estimated to be 86% per LACDPW Hydrology Manual land use type
“Low-Rise Apartments, Condominiums, and Townhouses”. Imperviousness is to be verified with
final site plan to confirm the consistency of the water quality treatment design during final
engineering.
C. Vicinity Map
The proposed development encompasses three (3) parcels consisting of approximately 3.44 gross
acres and 3.38 net acres. The site is bounded by existing residential lots to the north and east,
Mission Drive to the south, and power lines owned by Southern California Edison to the west.
Refer to Figure 1 for the Vicinity Map
D. Pre-Development Drainage Condition
All three parcels are currently a vacant lot. Besides two small service roads in southern and
eastern portions of the site the site is all pervious coverage. The site is surrounded by alternating
masonry block wall, wooden fence, and chain link fence around the entire property. There is
existing public sidewalk and driveway entrances along Mission Drive. There are no existing
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 4
storm drain facilities located on the site and no storm drain facilities located in the adjacent
portion of Mission Drive along the project frontage.
The existing drainage pattern of the site is accounted for as one drainage area. The entire site
sheet flows over the vacant land in a southerly direction. Stormwater appears to simply sheet
flow over existing driveway entrances and enters Mission Road. Once stormwater enters Mission
Rd. it flows in a southeasterly direction and enters a Los Angeles County Flood Control District
(LACFCD) owned catch basin approximately 500’ downstream of our site. This catch basin is
connected to a LACFCD 30” RCP which flows into the Eaton Wash channel then into the Rio
Hondo Channel. The Rio Hondo Channel then connects to the Los Angeles River then ultimately
the Pacific Ocean. Water bodies downstream of the project site are listed on the most current 303
(d) List as follows:
Rio Hondo Channel Reach 3
o Indicator Bacteria
o Iron
o Oxygen, Dissolved
Rio Hondo Channel Reach 2
o Cyanide
Rio Hondo Channel Reach 1
o Copper
o Indicator Bacteria
o Lead
o Toxicity
o Trash
o Zinc
o pH
Los Angeles River Reach 2
o Ammonia
o Copper
o Indicator Bacteria
o Lead
o Nutrients (Algae)
o Oil
o Trash
Los Angeles River Reach 1
o Ammonia
o Cadmium
o Cyanide
o Indicator Bacteria
o Lead
o Nutrients (Algae)
o Trash
o pH
Los Angeles River Estuary
o Chlordane
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 5
o Toxicity
o Trash
San Pedro Bay Near/ Offshore Zones
o Chlordane
o DDT (tissue & sediment)
o PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
o Sediment Toxicity
E. Post-Development Drainage Condition
The proposed project consists of 8 duplex units and 29 single family homes over approximately
3.38 acres. The proposed development includes drive aisles, parking, landscaping, walkways,
patios, and common open space areas. The site will be graded to collect runoff at one low point
to control the amount of imported fill during grading and maintaining the existing site drainage
pattern. The proposed development will utilize onsite catch basins, infiltration systems, and a
detention pipe system to capture and treat stormwater. Stormwater up to the design capture
volume will be infiltrated by a proposed onsite drywell system.
Stormwater runoff will be conveyed via proposed onsite gutter and directed to one sump area
equipped with a curb inlet catch basin. There will be two additional catch basins located along
the site’s main spine in flow by conditions to convey stormwater into the underground storm
drain system. The sump catch basin will be located at the end of the drive aisle at the southern
property line. All on-site catch basins will be connected by storm drain pipe to the drywell
infiltration system for water quality treatment. During larger storm events, stormwater runoff
will back up the drywell system which is connected to the underground detention system. Larger
storm events will bypass the infiltration system and overflow into a proposed grate inlet catch
basin which is attached to a parkway culvert. Once stormwater enters the parkway culvert it will
drain into Mission Road and follow the existing drainage pattern. For emergency overflow,
runoff will spill out of the proposed curb inlet catch basin, topple over the proposed driveway
entrance, and sheet flow into Mission Road. Refer to separately prepared Preliminary Grading
and Utility Plans for site design information.
Per Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc. dated October
27, 2021, infiltration BMPs were determined to be feasible. “Based on the results of percolation
testing and analyses, the well configuration as depicted on Plate 2 may utilize a “measured” peak
flow rate of 0.16 ft³/sec. This flow rate corresponds to an average peak infiltration rate of 17.0
in./hr.”
Refer to Figure 2, BMP Exhibit for additional information.
F. LID Project Types, Characteristics, & Activities
Per the Los Angeles Department of Public Works (LACDPW), Low Impact Development
Standards Manual, dated February 2014, the proposed project is classified as a “Designated
Project.” A “Designated Project” is defined by the LACDPW as follows:
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 6
“Redevelopment projects, which are developments that result in creation or addition or
replacement of either: (1) 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface on a site that
was previously developed as described in the above bullets; or (2) 10,000 square feet or
more of impervious surface area on a site that was previous developed as a single-family
home.”
G. Pollutant Source Identification and BMP Selection
The following is a list of materials to be used in the daily construction activities at the project
site, which will potentially contribute to pollutants, other than sediment, to storm water runoff.
Control Practices for each activity are identified below:
Vehicle fluids, including oil, grease, petroleum, and coolants from personal vehicles.
Landscaping materials and wastes (topsoil, plant materials, herbicides, fertilizers, mulch,
pesticides)
General trash debris and litter
Pet waste (bacteria/ fecal coliforms)
The Best Management Practices (BMPs) that have been selected for implementation on this
project are detailed in the following sections.
H. Source Control BMPs
The County of Los Angeles LID Standards Manual lists preference for selection of BMPs which
includes retention-based stormwater quality control measures, biofiltration, vegetation-based
storm quality control measures, and/or treatment-based stormwater quality control measures.
This project has selected a retention-based stormwater quality control measure by using a
drywell infiltration system.
In the soils report prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc. infiltration systems were determined to
be feasible as a stormwater BMP. Additionally, roof gutters will discharge to landscape areas
using splash blocks when possible, creating a passive bio treatment in small planter areas prior to
interception by an area drain system, catch basin, and storm drain system. All runoff from the
site is tributary to the proposed onsite drywell infiltration system. As retention-based stormwater
quality control measures are of the highest priority per the LA County LID Manual, the other the
other stormwater quality control measures were not considered. Drywells were selected for their
reduced footprint compared to other retention-based infiltration systems.
Structural BMPs shall be installed by Mission Villas, LLC, the developer, through the
construction and development of the project; planting and irrigation systems shall be designed by
licensed landscape architects and installed by qualified contractors to specifications and
standards of the City of Rosemead. The structural BMPs used for this project are summarized
below.
Project proponents shall implement site design concepts that achieve each of the following:
Minimize Storm Water Pollutants of Concern
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 7
Peak Storm Water Runoff Discharge Rate
The following tables identify the source control and treatment BMPs and how each is
implemented to achieve each site design concept.
Table-1: Site Design BMPs
BMP TECHNIQUE
INCLUDED? BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF
METHOD YES NO
SD-10 Site Design &
Landscape Planning X
SD-11 Roof Runoff Controls X
SD-12 Efficient Irrigation X
SD-13 Storm Drain Signage X
SD-20 Pervious Pavements X Site design does not allow for this BMP.
SD-21 Alternative Building
Materials X Not Applicable
SD-30 Fueling Areas X Not Applicable
SD-31 Maintenance Bays &
Docks X Not Applicable
SD-32 Trash Storage Areas X No Trash Storage Areas Proposed
SD-33 Vehicle Washing Areas X Not Applicable
SD-34 Outdoor Material
Storage Areas X Not Applicable
SD-35 Outdoor Work Areas X Not Applicable
SD-36 Outdoor Processing
Areas X Not Applicable
Roof Runoff Controls
All roof runoff will be collected and directed to splash blocks then onto grass or vegetated swales
before discharging to the street or storm drain system. Area drains within the onsite landscaping
between buildings will flow to onsite infiltration system where flows will be treated.
Efficient Irrigation
As part of the design of all common area landscape irrigation shall employ water conservation
principals, including, but not limited to, such provisions as water sensors, programmable
irrigation times (for short cycles), etc., will be used. Such common areas will be maintained by
the HOA.
Storm Drain Signage
Storm Drain Signage will be provided on all proposed on-site catch basins to prevent residence
from discarding pollutants to the storm drain system and potentially obstructing the proposed
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 8
BMP treatment facility. The placard or stencil will indicate the ultimate destination of the runoff
entering the device. This stencil shall be always weatherproof and visible. The HOA will be
responsible for maintaining the signage after the construction is completed. See Appendix D for
an example.
Table-2: Source Control BMPs
BMP TECHNIQUE
INCLUDED? BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF
METHOD YES NO
S-1 Storm Drain Message and
Signage X
S-2 Outdoor Material Storage Area X Not Applicable
S-3 Outdoor Trash Storage and
Waste Handling Area X Not Applicable
S-4 Outdoor Loading/Unloading
Dock Area X No Loading Dock Areas
S-5 Outdoor Repair/Maintenance
Area X No Maintenance Bays
S-6
Outdoor
Vehicle/Equipment’s/Accessory
Washing Area
X No Wash Areas
S-7 Fueling Area X No Fueling Areas
S-8 Landscape Irrigation Practices X
S-9 Building Materials Selection X
S-10 Animal Care and Handling
Facilities X No Animal Care Facility
S-11 Outdoor Horticulture Areas X Not Applicable
Storm Drain Message and Signage
Storm Drain Signage will be provided on all proposed on-site catch basins to prevent residence
from discarding pollutants to the storm drain system and potentially obstructing the proposed
BMP treatment facility. The placard or stencil will indicate the ultimate destination of the runoff
entering the device. This stencil shall be always weatherproof and visible. The HOA will be
responsible for maintaining the signage after the construction is completed. See Appendix B for
an example.
Landscape Irrigation Processes
Management programs will be designed and established by the HOA, who will maintain the
common areas within the project site. These programs will include how to mitigate the potential
dangers of fertilizer and pesticide usage (refer to the Maintenance and Frequency Table).
Ongoing maintenance will be consistent with the State of California Model- Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance. Fertilizer and pesticide usage shall be consistent with County
Management Guidelines for use of Fertilizers and Pesticides.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 9
Building Materials Selection
Material selection will minimize the use of copper, galvanized metals and other materials that
could add significant amounts of harmful pollutants to stormwater runoff.
Table-3: Stormwater Quality Control BMPs
BMP NAME
INCLUDED? IF NOT APPLICABLE, STATE BRIEF
REASON YES NO
RET-1 Bioretention X Used alternative method – Drywell System
RET-2 Infiltration Basin X Used alternative method – Drywell System
RET-3 Infiltration Trench X Used alternative method – Drywell System
RET-4 Drywell X A Maxwell Plus Drywell System will be
used on this site.
RET-5
Permeable Pavement
without an
Underdrain
X Used alternative method – Drywell System
RET-6 Rain Barrel/Cistern X Used alternative method – Drywell System
BIO-1 Biofiltration X Used alternative method – Drywell System
VEG-1 Green Roof X Space not available for BMP
VEG-2 Stormwater Planter X Used alternative method – Drywell System
VEG-3 Tree-Well Filter X Used alternative method – Drywell System
VEG-4 Vegetated Swales X Space not available for BMP
VEG-5 Vegetated Filter Strip X Space not available for BMP
T-1 Sand Filter X Space not available for BMP
T-2 Constructed Wetland X This is not a wetland area/ development
T-3 Extended Detention
Basin X Space not available for BMP
T-4 Wet Pond X This is not a wetland area/ development
T-5 Permeable Pavement
with an Underdrain X Used alternative method – Drywell System
RET-4 Drywell
Storm water will enter the drywell unit via curb openings throughout the site and flow via pipe
directly onto specially designed pretreatment chamber. The pretreatment chamber is designed
intercept the majority of the first flows during a rain event and reduce the impact of sediment and
debris on the system. After the pretreatment chamber fills up stormwater will flow into the main
drywell system where it will be infiltrated. A detention system located upstream of the drywell
will have a high-flow bypass inlet for flows greater than the 85th percentile storm event. See
Appendix C for drywell sizing calculations.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 10
I. Non-Structural BMPs
Non-structural BMPs are generally managerial, educational, inspection and/ or maintenance
oriented. These items consist of educating employees and occupants, developing, and
implementing HOA guidelines, implementing BMPs and enforcing Code requirements. Non-
structural BMPs used for this project are summarized below:
Education for Employees and Occupants
Practical informational materials will be provided to occupants, the HOA and employees on
general good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality. Among
other things, these materials will describe the use of chemicals (including household type) that
should be limited to the property, with no discharge of specified wastes via hosing or other direct
discharge to gutters, catch basins and storm drains.
This program must be maintained, enforced, and updated periodically by the HOA. Educational
materials including, but not limited to, the materials included in the Appendix F of this plan will
be made available to the employees and contractors of the HOA.
Activity Restrictions
Activities on this site will be limited to activities related to residential living. The Conditions,
Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) will outline the activities that are restricted on the
property. Such activities related to the LID include car washing, car maintenance and disposal of
used motor fluids, pet waste cleanup, and trash container areas.
Common Area Landscape Management
Management programs will be designed and established by the HOA, who will maintain the
common areas within the project site. These programs will include how to mitigate the potential
dangers of fertilizer and pesticide usage, require that fertilizer and pesticide usage shall be
consistent with City and County guidelines, discuss utilization of water-efficient landscaping
practices, require that maintenance be consistent with any Los Angeles County water
conservation resolutions or City of Rosemead equivalent, and detail the proper disposal of
landscape wastes. Ongoing maintenance will be consistent with the State of California Model
Water-Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Fertilizer and pesticide usage shall be consistent with
County Management Guidelines for use of Fertilizers and Pesticides.
Common Area Litter Control
The HOA will be required to implement trash management and litter control procedures in the
common areas aimed at reducing pollution of drainage water. The HOA may also contract with
their landscape maintenance firm to provide this service during regularly scheduled maintenance,
which should consist of litter patrol, emptying of trash receptacles in common areas, and noting
trash disposal violations and reporting the violations to the HOA for remediation.
Street Sweeping in Private Streets and Parking Lots
The HOA shall have all streets and parking lots swept on a weekly basis. This procedure will be
intensified around October 15th of each year prior to and throughout rainstorm period.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 11
Drainage Facility Inspection & Maintenance
The HOA will be responsible for implementing each of the BMPs detailed in this plan. The
HOA will also be responsible for cleaning and maintaining the BMPs on a regular basis. Refer
to Appendix G for the Operation and Maintenance Plan. Refer to Appendix B for site specific
drainage BMP information.
Title 22 CC&R Compliance
The HOA will comply with this Regulation as part of the development’s CC&Rs. CC&Rs will
be prepared as a separate document and reviewed by the City’s Attorney.
Uniform Fire Code Implementation
The HOA will comply with this Code as part of the development’s CC&Rs. CC&Rs will be
prepared as a separate document and reviewed by the City’s Attorney
Employee Training/Education Program
A training program will be established as it would apply to future employees, contractors, and
homeowners of the HOA to inform and train in maintenance activities regarding the impact of
dumping oil, paints, solvents, or other potentially harmful chemicals into storm drains; the proper
use of fertilizers and pesticides in landscaping maintenance practices; and the impacts of littering
and improper water disposal.
The HOA (or a hired firm) will conduct the training program which will include targeted training
sessions with specific construction disciplines (landscaping, concrete finishers, painters, etc.).
See Appendix F for examples of educational materials that will be provided to the Employees.
The project’s O&M will include provisions for future employee training programs conducted on
a yearly based prior to the rainy season.
J. BMP Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair
Inspections will be conducted as follows:
Annually prior to the start of the rainy season (Oct. 1st- May 31st)
Every (1) month during rainy season
At any other time(s) or intervals of time specified in the contract documents
An inspection form shall be completed at least once per year prior to the start of the rainy season.
This inspection check sheet (see Appendix G) shall be included in this report and always kept
onsite. The check sheet should be filled out completely and clearly indicate any BMPs that need
repair or maintenance. These repairs and/ or maintenance procedures shall be carried out at the
soonest possible time.
A legible log shall be kept on site to record the inspection of the storm water pollution abatement
control measures. The record must contain the following information: (i) type of maintenance
activities or source-control practices; (ii) date the activities are completed; and (iii) the name of
the operator performing the activities. During transfer of ownership/operation of the facility, the
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 12
current owner must notify the new owner/operator of the BMPs and the associated maintenance
activities that also transfer to the new owner/operator of the property. See Appendix G.
K. Inspection, Maintenance, and Responsibility for BMPs
The following tables list the post-construction BMPs (routine non-structural and structural), the
required ongoing maintenance, the inspection and maintenance frequency, the inspection criteria,
and the entity or party responsible for implementation, maintenance, and/or inspection.
Table-4: Non-Structural BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix
BMP RESPONSIBILITY FREQUENCY
Homeowner/
Business owner
Education, Activity
Restrictions
HOA will provide educational
materials. Those materials and
responsibilities must be passed
onto subsequent property
owners.
Continuous. CC&Rs to be provided to
homeowners at the time they purchase the
property and updates provided by the
HOA as they occur.
Common Area
Landscape
Management
HOA will appoint a landscape
maintenance contractor
Monthly during regular maintenance and
use with management guidelines for use of
fertilizers and pesticides.
Parking Areas and
Drives Management
HOA will appoint a landscape
maintenance contractor
The Drives Aisles are to be swept on a
routine scheduled basis to facilitate the
pickup of trash and debris (plant or
otherwise) and to remove excessive oil,
grease, and build-up. During sweeping,
debris is to be removed from the parking
areas and drives and then scrubbed and
rinsed. This sweeping schedule will be at
a minimum occurrence of once a week and
as necessary to rid / reduce active
pollutants from the pavement areas. This
maintenance requirement will be listed in
the Convent, Conditions and Restrictions
(CC&Rs) of this project. These CC&Rs
will be recorded to the property at the
County Recorder’s Office and be included
on the final Title report of these properties.
Litter Control by
Sweeping
HOA will appoint a landscape
maintenance contractor.
Weekly inspection of trash receptacles to
ensure that lids are closed and pick up any
excess trash on the ground, noting trash
disposal violations to the HOA for
remediation.
Employee Training HOA will appoint a landscape
contractor after construction.
Monthly for maintenance personnel and
employees to include the educational
materials contained in the approved LID.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 13
BMP RESPONSIBILITY FREQUENCY
Common Area
Catch Basin
Inspection &
Cleaning
HOA will appoint a landscape
maintenance contractor for
common areas and storm drain
facilities.
Inspect basins once a month. Clean debris
and silt in bottom of catch basins as
needed. Intensified on or about October
15th each year or prior to the first 24-hour
storm event, whichever occurs first.
Refer to Appendix E.
Table-5: Structural BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix
BMP RESPONSIBILITY FREQUENCY
Common Area
Efficient Irrigation
HOA will appoint a
landscape contractor
after construction
Once a week, in conjunction with maintenance
activities. Verify that runoff minimizing
landscape design continues to function by
checking that water sensors are functioning
properly, that irrigation heads are adjusted
properly to eliminate overspray to hardscape
areas, and to verify that irrigation timing and
cycle lengths are adjusted in accordance with
water demands, given time of year, weather and
day or nighttime temperatures.
Common Area
Runoff Efficient
Landscape Design
HOA will appoint a
landscaping
contractor
Once a week in conjunction with maintenance
activities and prior to finalizing any replanting
schemes. Verify that plants continue to be
grouped according to similar water requirements
to reduce excess irrigation runoff.
Catch Basin
Stenciling HOA
A warning stencil will be painted on top and in
view with the words:
“No-Dumping – Drains to Ocean”
At all catch basin, drain inlets draining to the
street or storm drain system. See Appendix “B”
(example). Once every 6 months, inspect for re-
stenciling needs. Re-stencil as needed
immediately.
Maxwell Plus
Drywell System HOA
Maxwell Plus Drywell System maintenance will
conform to manufacturer’s specifications. Please
see additional information in Appendix C
Stormwater
Detention System HOA
Stormwater detention system maintenance will
conform to manufacturer’s specifications.
Oldcastle FloGard
Catch Basin Insert
Filters
HOA
Oldcastle FloGard catch basin insert filter
maintenance will conform to manufacturer’s
specifications. See additional information in
Appendix C
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Section 4
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022 Page 14
L. Operation/Maintenance Funding after Project Completion
The post-construction BMPs as described above will be funded and maintained by:
The Homeowner’s Association
Maintenance and requirements of the maintenance for the properties will be listed in the
Convent, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of this project and will be the responsibility of
the property owner at all times. These CC&Rs will be recorded to the property at the County
Recorder’s Office and be included on the Title report of these properties.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Figure -1:
Project Vicinity Map
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Figure -2:
BMP Exhibit
MM//
//
//
//
//
//
////////
//
//
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Figure -3:
Impaired Waters
?Ý
!"^$
AÐ %&g(
%&g(Aà
%&l(
%&l(
%&l(
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
%&o(
%&o(
?q
?q
?º
%&e(
%&e(
?Õ
%&q(
%&q(
%&d(
%&d(
?»?»
AË
IÄ
IÄ
Aÿ
AVAVBVHUGHES
BVDR
STSTSTBVNN RDBVF E L I ZLOS
AVBVAVR
D
6TH PYB VCANYONANGELES
M
T
R
E
D BOX
PY
BV
TUJUNGA R D
BVHY
HYRDBV
BV BVARTESIA
MAGIC
WOODMANAVWY
BVLABVVAN NUYSRDBVBVMAGNOLIAAVBV STVINELANDAVAVTAMPAMOUNTAIN
BV
DR
COLORADO HUNTINGTON
RD
L I V EST
RD
O A KFRANCISQUITOO
L
D
SHERMAN
BALBOAFALLBROOKAVM A Y O DRLY O N S AV
RDSANDTHE
RDSANARROYOA R R O WAV
DR FOOTHILL
F OOTH I L LSAN
FERNANDOBV
RDROSCOEBVDEVONSHIRE
HY WILSHIRESUNSET
BV
RD
MTBVLAKEBVST
IMPERIAL
BL
VENTURA
BLVICTORY
WY
CARSON
COAST
25THST ALAMITOS AVAV
BVMAINB ST
ST
ST
ARTESIA
BV
NORWALKFIRESTONE
ATLANTICBVBV
BV
HYLEFFINGWELLRD
BV
COLIMANORWALKBV
A V
AVST CARSON
7TH ATLANTICWILLOW
BV HY
ST HYPEARBLOSSOM
HYSIERRA 87 THST EFORT TEJON
H YRDVIRGENESLASCANYONMALIBUMULHOLLANDVALLEYCIRCLE SUNLANDTUXFORDHILL
GLENDALEVERDUGOH U N TIN G TO N
MISSIONMAIN
PECKBO UQUETS O L E D A D CANYON
SIERRASECO CYNFERNANDOV A LEN C IA RDSANCANYONCANYON
BIG
CRESTANGELESFO R E STGLEASONANGELESCRESTFOOT AVWILSON
PACIFIC
SEPULVEDA
HAWTHORNEWESTERNWILMINGTONBRO ADW AYVALLEYMAIN
HACIENDALITTLETUJUNGAMANCHESTER BREAROSECRANS
O C EA NALA MEDAROSEMEADTOPANGASUNSETCANYON
WHITTIER
LINCOLN
H E N R Y
L A S T U N A S DR
SLAUSON GLENDORA AVSTGAFFEYSEPULVEDAPACIFICAVLAKEWOODBVCOUNT
YORANGES A N TA CLA R A RIVERS A N TA CLARA
RIV E RLOS
ANGELES RIV E R
LOS ANGELESRIVERRIVERLOS ANGELESSANGABRIELRIVERSA NGABRIELRIVERW EST
SAN GABRIE L
ENCINORESERVOIR
UPPERFRANKLINRESERVOIR
HOLLYWOODRESERVOIR
SILVER LAKERESERVOIR
LEGG LAKE
BIGSANTAANITARESERVOIR SAWPITCANYONRESERVOIR
COGSWELLRESERVOIR
BIG TUJUNGARESERVOIR
PACOIMARESERVOIR
HANSENDAM
LITTLE ROCKRESERVOIR
DRY CANYONRESERVOIR
SEPULVEDA FLOODCONTROL BASIN
STONECANYONRESERVOIR LOWERFRANKLINCANYONRESERVOIR
HARBORLAKE
CHATSWORTHRESERVOIR
WHITTIER NARROWS DAM
SANTA FE DAM
EATONWASHDAM
DEVIL'SGATEDAM& RES
LOS ANGELESRESERVOIR
SANTA MONICARUSTICCANYONMANDEVILLE CANYON CHANNELSULLIVAN CANYONCHANNEL
CANYON CHANNELR
EXF
O
R
D
CHANNELCOLDWATERCANYONCHANNELCH AN NELA
L
H
A
MB
R
A
BENEDICT CANYONCHANNEL
COLDWATERCHANNELB
E
N
E
DIC
T C
A
N
Y
O
N C
H
A
N
N
E
L
SYCAMORE CANYON
ARROYO SECOC
R
E
EK
WASH
SAN
PAS
Q
UAL
MILL CREEKCREEKCABALLEROENCINO CHANNELT
U
J
U
N
G
A
W
A
S
H
CENTRAL BRANCH WASHB
U
R
B
A
N
K WE
S
T
E
R
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
V E R D U G O WASH
SYCAM
ORE W
ASHDEAD HORSE CANYON CHANNELSYCAMORE-SCHOLL
DIVERSIONROYAL CANYON CHANNELREYNOLDSCOURT
LAT
CHESEBORO CANYON CHANNEL VAN TASSEL CANYONCHANNELMADDOCKCHANNELSPINKSCHANNELBRADBURYCHANNELDRY CANYONSOUTH FORKDRY CANYON CHANNELS
A
W
TE
LLE C
H
A
N
N
EL ARROYO SECOCHANNEL
SCHOLLCHANNEL
CHANNEL
SYCAMORECANYON
CLEMENTSLATERALC A S C A D IA
L A T E R A L
LENORECHANNELCHANNELBUENA VISTA
BUENA VISTACHANNEL
SIE
R
R
A
M
A
D
R
E
W
A
S
H SAWPIT WASHBRADBURY CHANNELBALLONA CREEK
CREEKARCADIAARCADIA EAST BRANCH WASHBALDWIN AVE.LIMA ST.SAN JOSE PUENTECREEKWASHRUBIOW
ASH
WASH
E
A
T
O
N
RIO HONDO CHANNELBIG DALTON WASHWALN U T C HA N N EL
WALNUT CHANNEL
CREEK
CRE
E
K
DRAINWILLMINGTONDOMINGUEZ
CHANNEL RIO HONDOVERDENORTH FORKTACOBICREEKCOMPTON
DOMINGUEZ WASHANDERSONCREEKBALLONA
COMPTON CREEKLAGUNADOMINGUEZ F.C.S
C
H
A
N
N
E
L EAST BRANCHCHANNELLA MIRADACREEKLA CANADACOYOTECOYOTECREEKC OY O T E
LOS CERRITOS CHANNEL
ATBELLCHANNEL
CENTINELA CREEK
SEP
ULVE
DA C
HA
N
N
EL
SEPULVEDA CHANNELCREEKCASTAIC SYSTE
M
W
ESTERN
BURBANK
CHANNEL
PEARLAND
VIOLIN
GOVERNOR CANYON CHANNELACTON CANYONCHANNELACTONCANYONRED ROVERCANYON CHANNELS
H
A
N
N
O
N V
ALLEY
CANYON
BOUQUET CANYONTEXAS CANYON
CANYON
HASLEY
POLE CANYONCANYONMINTCHANNELBOUQUET CANYON
SANTA CLARA RIVER
SOUTH FORK LIVE OAK
S
P
RIN
G
S
C
A
N
Y
O
N
OAK SPRING CANYON
SAND CANYONCREEK
PLACERITA
SA
NTA CLAR
A
RIV
E
R
S
O
UTH F
O
RK
CH
A
N
NEL
MAY CANYON CHANNELKAGELCANYONCHANNELCHANNEL
MANSFIELD
BU
L
L
C
RE
E
K
R
E
S
E
R
V
OI
R
B
R
A
N
C
H
EAST CANYON CHANNEL
SYLMAR CHANNEL CANYONWILSONSOMBRERO CYNCHANNELSTETSON CYN
CHANNELSOMBRERO CHANNELHOG CANYONCHANNELCANYONCHANNELLOPEZDIVERSIONPACOIMABULL CREEK
CREEKLIMEKILNEAST BRANCHALISO CREEKHANSENHEIGHTSCHANNEL
TUJUNGA WASHPAC
OIMACREEK
ALISO CREEKLIMEKILN CREEK CREEKWILBURSANTA SUSANA CREEKDAYTON CREEK
BULLSOUTH CHANNEL - PACOIMA WASHCHA
T
S
WO
RT
HCRE
E
K
BELL CREEKCREEK
CALABASASCREEKCREEKBROWNSSOUTHB E L L
CREEKESCORPIONFORKC R E E KBELL BROWNS CREEKCHIQUITO CANYON
SAN MARTINEZ-SPILLWAYCANYON DRYCANYONCANYONSAN FRANCISQUITOHASKELL CANYONNEWHALL
IRON CANYONSAND CANYONVASQUEZ CANYON
CHANNELP L U M C A N Y O N C H A N N E L
RABBIT CANYON
SOLEDADCANYON LITTLE ROCK WASHA Q U E D U C TAQUEDUCT
CHANNEL
CENTRAL BRANCH
WASHC H A N D L E R C A N Y O N
L IT T L E T U J U N G A W A S H
CHANNELL A T U N A C A N Y O N C H A N N E L
VERDUGO WASH GOSS CYN.INLETQUAILCREEKCLOUD CREEKCHANNELEAGLE WARDCHANNELCHANNELCANYONDUNSMUIRCHANNELCANYONCOOKSSHIELDS CANYONSUNSET LATALTADE NA SYSTEM
RUBIO
RUBIODIVERSIONWASHGOOSEBERRYCREEKCHANNEL
ROWLEYCANYON
ZACHAUCHANNEL
BLANCHARDCANYONCHANNELBLUEGUMCANYONCHANNEL
WEBBERCANYONCHANNELBURBANK EASTERN
SYSTEM CHANNELHILLCRESTBRAND CANYON CHANNELCHILDSCANYON CHANNELELMWOODCANYON CHANNELENGLEHEARDCANYON CHANNEL
WASHV
E
R
D
U
G
OMCCLURE CHANLOCKHEEDCHANNEL CHANNELCANYONSTOUGHHAINES CANYONCHANNELPICKENS CANYON CHANNELHALLS CANYON CHANNELWINERY CANYON CHANNELHAY CANYON CHANNELFLINT CANYON CHANNELGOULD CANYONPARADISECANYON CHANNELCHANNELWASHCANYONANITA
S
A
N
T
A
LITTLE
CANYONBAILEYSIERRA MADRE VILLA CHANNELCARRIAGE HOUSECANYONAUBURNCHANNELLANNANCHANNELCANYONANITASANTAARCADIACALIFORNIA
LATERALWASHPACOIMACREEKWASHSANTAANITACHANNELTEMPLECITY
P
A
C
I
F
I
C OC
E
ANLos Angeles River Watershed
LOSANGELES
LONGBEACH
SANTACLARITA
CARSON
PASADENA
TORRANCE
BURBANK
WHITTIER
DOWNEY
COMPTON
CALABASAS
NORWALK
CERRITOS
LAKEWOOD
INGLEWOOD
DUARTE
MALIBU
ALHAMBRA
SOUTHGATE
SANTAMONICA
LAMIRADA
BELL
HAWTHORNE
MONTEREYPARK
ELSEGUNDO
SANMARINO
GLENDALE MONROVIA
ARCADIA
IRWINDALE
PICORIVERA
VERNON
MONTEBELLO
GARDENA
PALMDALE
COMMERCE
RANCHOPALOSVERDES
INDUSTRY
ELMONTE
LYNWOOD
ROSEMEAD
BELLFLOWER
BALDWINPARK
PARAMOUNT
SANTAFESPRINGS
CULVERCITY
REDONDOBEACH
BEVERLYHILLS
LACANADAFLINTRIDGE
WESTCOVINA
LOMITA
SANGABRIEL
LAHABRAHEIGHTS
LAPUENTE
ARTESIA
PALOSVERDESESTATES
ROLLINGHILLS
LAWNDALEMANHATTANBEACH
SOUTHPASADENA
SIGNALHILL
CUDAHY
SOUTHELMONTE
ROLLINGHILLSESTATES
BELLGARDENS
HUNTINGTONPARK
HIDDENHILLS
SANFERNANDO
MAYWOOD
WESTHOLLYWOOD
HERMOSABEACH
HAWAIIANGARDENS
PICO
LANG
ACTON
WATTS
PALMS
ATHENS
SAUGUS
NAPLES
MONETA
LENNOX
VENICE
AGOURA
RESEDA
NEWHALL
SOLEDAD
CASTAIC
MAYFAIR
BASSETT
TOPANGA
TARZANA
TUJUNGA
PACOIMA
BIG ROCK
GLENVIEW
VALENCIA
PINETREE
LAKEVIEW
WALTERIA
ROSEWOOD
EL PORTO
FLORENCE
CRENSHAW
WESTLAKE
MID CITY
WESTWOOD
FERNWOOD
VAN NUYS
ALTADENA
WINNETKA
DEL VALLE
VAL VERDE
SAN PEDRO
MIRALESTE
DOMINGUEZ
HOLLYDALE
HYDE PARK
VIEW PARK
FOX HILLS
MAR VISTA
KOREATOWN
BRENTWOOD
ECHO PARK
LOS FELIZOLD CANYON
AGUA DULCE
WILMINGTON
OCEAN PARK
MONTE NIDO
EAGLE ROCK
SUN VALLEYNORTHRIDGE
WEST HILLS
CHATSWORTH
OLIVE VIEW
MINT CANYON
HARBOR CITY
WALNUT PARK
WILLOWBROOK
WESTCHESTER
RANCHO PARK
SYLVIA PARK
CANOGA PARK
FORREST PARK
BIXBY KNOLLS
LEIMERT PARK
CITY TERRACECENTURY CITY
BEVERLY GLEN
VASQUEZ ROCKS
PLAYA DEL REY
WINDSOR HILLS
BALDWIN HILLS
BOYLE HEIGHTS
CHEVIOT HILLS
CASTELLAMMARE
HIGHLAND PARK
MT WASHINGTONGLASSELL\PARK
MOUNT OLYMPUS
WARNER CENTER
MISSION HILLSGRANADA HILLS
CANYON COUNTRY
HARBOR GATEWAY
MARINA DEL REY
JEFFERSON PARK
UNIVERSAL CITY
VALLEY VILLAGEWOODLAND HILLS
CALABASAS PARK
SULPHUR SPRINGS
STEVENSON RANCH
TERMINAL ISLAND
NORWOOD VILLAGE
ATWATER VILLAGE
BEL AIR ESTATES
NORTH HOLLYWOOD
CASTAIC JUNCTION
RANCHO DOMINGUEZ
NORTH LONG BEACH
MORNINGSIDE PARK
HACIENDA HEIGHTS
EAST LOS ANGELES
HOLLYWOOD RIVIERA
SOUTH SAN GABRIELCOUNTRY CLUB PARK
PACIFIC PALISADES
LAKE VIEW TERRACE
BIG MOUNTAIN RIDGE
PALISADES HIGHLANDS
CALABASAS HIGHLANDS
REF: \\pwgisd02\mpmgis$\MPMGIS\projects\mpm\gismaps\wk_2627\lariver_wtrsheds.mxd DATE: 08/22/07
Data contained in this map is produced in wholeor part from the Los Angeles County Departmentof Public Works' digital database.
0 2 41
MILES
I
Mapping & Property Management Division, Mapping & GIS Services Section
LEGEND
LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERSHED
UNINCORPORATED AREA
DAM / LAKE / RESERVOIR
MAJOR RIVER
MAJOR CHANNEL
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Appendix A:
Volume and Flow Rate Calculations and Hydrologic Report
The proposed development was analyzed for the 0.75-in storm event and the 85th Percentile storm event
using the LACDPW HydroCalc software. The governing stormwater runoff volume between the two
storm events was utilized for design. Below is a summary of the HydroCalc outputs:
DMA 85th Percentile Storm 0.75-in Storm Governing
Volume (cf) Volume (cf) Flowrate (cfs) Volume (cf) Flowrate (cfs)
1 8,629.68 0.5731 7,191.44 0.4485 8,629.69
Refer to LACDPW HydroCalc Output Data within this Appendix for Volume and Flowrate Calculations.
Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis
File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/LID/Preliminary/Appendix A - Calcs/BORS-003 - DMA 1 - 85%.pdf
Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3
Input Parameters
Project Name BORS-003
Subarea ID DMA 1
Area (ac)3.38
Flow Path Length (ft)714.0
Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009
85th Percentile Rainfall Depth (in)0.9
Percent Impervious 0.86
Soil Type 6
Design Storm Frequency 85th percentile storm
Fire Factor 0
LID True
Output Results
Modeled (85th percentile storm) Rainfall Depth (in)0.9
Peak Intensity (in/hr)0.2152
Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.1
Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.788
Time of Concentration (min)35.0
Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)0.5731
Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)0.5731
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.1981
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)8629.6809
Peak Flow Hydrologic Analysis
File location: P:/B/BORS-003/Admin/Reports/LID/Preliminary/Appendix A - Calcs/BORS-003 - DMA 1 - .75in.pdf
Version: HydroCalc 1.0.3
Input Parameters
Project Name BORS-003
Subarea ID DMA 1
Area (ac)3.38
Flow Path Length (ft)714.0
Flow Path Slope (vft/hft)0.009
0.75-inch Rainfall Depth (in)0.75
Percent Impervious 0.86
Soil Type 6
Design Storm Frequency 0.75 inch storm
Fire Factor 0
LID True
Output Results
Modeled (0.75 inch storm) Rainfall Depth (in)0.75
Peak Intensity (in/hr)0.1684
Undeveloped Runoff Coefficient (Cu)0.1
Developed Runoff Coefficient (Cd)0.788
Time of Concentration (min)40.0
Clear Peak Flow Rate (cfs)0.4485
Burned Peak Flow Rate (cfs)0.4485
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (ac-ft)0.1651
24-Hr Clear Runoff Volume (cu-ft)7191.4357
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Appendix B:
Site BMPs
County of Los Angeles D-1 February 2014
S-1: Storm Drain Message and Signage
Purpose
Waste material dumped into storm drain inlets can adversely impact surface and groundwaters. In fact, any material discharged into the storm drain system has the potential tosignificantly impact downstream receiving waters. Storm drain messages have becomea popular method of alerting and reminding the public about the effects of and the
prohibitions against waste disposal into the storm drain system. The signs are typicallystenciled or affixed near the storm drain inlet or catch basin. The message simplyinforms the public that dumping of wastes into storm drain inlets is prohibited and/or thatthe drain ultimately discharges into receiving waters.
General Guidance
x The signs must be placed so they are easily visible to the public.
x Be aware that signs placed on sidewalk will be worn by foot traffic.
Design Specifications
x Signs with language and/or graphical icons that prohibit illegal dumping,mustbeposted at designated public access points along channels and streams within the
project area. Consult with Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
(LACDPW) staff to determine specific signage requirements for channels andstreams.
x Storm drain message markers, placards, concrete stamps, or stenciledlanguage/icons (e.g., “No Dumping – Drains to the Ocean”) are required at all
storm drain inlets and catch basins within the project area to discourage illegal or
inadvertent dumping. Signs should be placed in clear sight facing anyoneapproaching the storm drain inlet or catch basin from either side (see Figure D-1and Figure D-2). LACDPW staff should be contacted to determine specificrequirements for types of signs and methods of application. A stencil can be
purchased for a nominal fee from LACDPW Building and Safety Office by calling
(626) 458-3171. All storm drain inlet and catch basin locations must be identifiedon the project site map.
Maintenance Requirements
Legibility and visibility of markers and signs should be maintained (e.g., signs should berepainted or replaced as necessary). If required by LACDPW, the owner/operator or
homeowner’s association shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the agency orrecord a deed restriction upon the property title to maintain the legibility of placards andsigns.
S-1: Storm Drain Message and Signage
County of Los Angeles D-2 February 2014
Figure D-1. Storm Drain Message Location – Curb Type Inlet
Figure D-2. Storm Drain Message Location – Catch Basin/Area Type Inlet
CONCRETE
PERIMETER
County of Los Angeles D-19 February 2014
S-8: Landscape Irrigation Practices
Purpose
Irrigation runoff provides a pathway for pollutants (i.e., nutrients, bacteria, organics,sediment) to enter the storm drain system. By effectively irrigating, less runoff isproduced resulting in less potential for pollutants to enter the storm drain system.
General Guidance
x Do not allow irrigation runoff from the landscaped area to drain directly tostorm
drain system.
x Minimize use of fertilizer, pesticides, and herbicides on landscaped areas.
x Plan sites with sufficient landscaped area and dispersal capacity (e.g.,ability toreceive irrigation water without generating runoff).
x Consult a landscape professional regarding appropriate plants, fertilizer,
mulching applications, and irrigation requirements (if any) to ensure healthyvegetation growth.
Design Specifications
x Choose plants that minimize the need for fertilizer and pesticides.
x Group plants with similar water requirements and water accordingly.
x Use mulch to minimize evaporation and erosion.
x Include a vegetative boundary around project site to act as a filter.
x Design the irrigation system to only water areas that need it.
x Install an approved subsurface drip, pop-up, or other irrigation system.
1 The
irrigation system should employ effective energy dissipation and uniformflow
spreading methods to prevent erosion and facilitate efficient dispersion.
x Install rain sensors to shut off the irrigation system during and after storm events.
x Include pressure sensors to shut off flow-through system in case of suddenpressure drop. A sudden pressure drop may indicate a broken irrigation heador
water line.
x If the hydraulic conductivity in the soil is not sufficient for the necessary waterapplication rate, implement soil amendments to avoid potential geotechnicalhazards (i.e., liquefaction, landslide, collapsible soils, and expansive soils).
1 If alternative distribution systems (e.g., spray irrigation) are approved, the County will establishguidelines to implement these new systems.
S-8: Landscape Irrigation Practices
County of Los Angeles D-20 February 2014
x For sites located on or within 50 feet of a steep slope (15% or greater), do notirrigate landscape within three days of a storm event to avoid potential
geotechnical instability.
2
x Implement Integrated Pest Management practices.
For additional guidelines and requirements, refer to the Los Angeles CountyDepartment of Health Services.
Maintenance Requirements
Maintain irrigation areas to remove trash and debris and loose vegetation. Rehabilitate
areas of bare soil. If a rain or pressure sensor is installed, it should be checkedperiodically to ensure proper function. Inspect and maintain irrigation equipment andcomponents to ensure proper functionality. Clean equipment as necessary to preventalgae growth and vector breeding. Maintenance agreements between LACDPW and
the owner/operator may be required. Failure to properly maintain building and property
may subject the property owner to citation.
2 As determined by the City of Los Angeles, Building and Safety Division
County of Los Angeles D-21 February 2014
S-9: Building Materials Selection
Purpose
Building materials can potentially contribute pollutants of concern to stormwater runoffthrough leaching. For example, metal buildings, roofing, and fencing materials may besignificant sources of metals in stormwater runoff, especially due to acidic precipitation.The use of alternative building materials can reduce pollutant sources in stormwater
runoff by eliminating compounds that can leach into stormwater runoff. Alternativebuilding materials may also reduce the need to perform maintenance activities (i.e.,painting) that involve pollutants of concern, and may reduce the volume of stormwaterrunoff. Alternative materials are available to replace lumber and paving.
Design Specifications
Lumber
Decks and other house components constructed using pressure-treated woodthatistypically treated using arsenate, copper, and chromium compounds are hazardous tothe environment. Pressure-treated wood may be replaced with cement-fiberorvinyl.
Roofs, Fencing, and Metals
Minimizing the use of copper and galvanized (zinc-coated) metals on buildings and
fencing can reduce leaching of these pollutants into stormwater runoff. The followingbuilding materials are conventionally made of galvanized metals:
x Metal roofs;
x Chain-link fencing and siding; and
x Metal downspouts, vents, flashing, and trim on roofs.
Architectural use of copper for roofs and gutters should be avoided. As an alternative tocopper and galvanized materials, coated metal products are available for both roofingand gutter application. Vinyl-coated fencing is an alternative to traditional galvanizedchain-link fences. These products eliminate contact of bare metal with precipitation or
stormwater runoff, and reduce the potential for stormwater runoff contamination.
Roofing materials are also made of recycled rubber and plastic.
Green roofs may be an option. Green roofs use vegetation such as grasses and otherplants as an exterior surface. The plants reduce the velocity of stormwater runoff andabsorb water to reduce the volume of stormwater runoff. One potential problem with
using green roofs in the Los Angeles County area is the long, hot and dry summers,
which may kill the plants if they are not watered. See the Green Roof Fact Sheet (RET-7) in Appendix E.
S-9: Building Materials Selection
County of Los Angeles D-22 February 2014
Pesticides
The use of pesticides around foundations can be reduced through the use of alternative
barriers. Sand barriers can be applied around foundations to deter termites, as they
cannot tunnel through sand. Metal shields also block termites from tunneling.Additionally, diatomaceous earth can be used to repel or kill a wide varietyofotherpests.
Maintenance Requirements
The integrity of structural elements that are subject to damage (e.g., signs) must be
maintained by the owner/operator as required by local codes and ordinances.
Maintenance agreements between LACDPW and the owner/operator may be required.Failure to properly maintain building and property may subject the property owner tocitation.
County of Los Angeles E-32 February 2014
RET-4: Dry Well
Description
A dry well is a bored, drilled, or driven
shaft or hole whose depth is greater than
its width. A dry well may either be a small
excavated pit filled with aggregate or a
prefabricated storage chamber or pipe
segment. Dry well design and function
are similar to infiltration trenches in that
they are designed to temporarily store and
subsequently infiltrate stormwater runoff.
In particular, dry wells can be used to
reduce the volume of stormwater runoff
from building roofs. While generally not a
significant source of stormwater runoff
pollution, roofs are one of the most important sources of new or increased stormwater
runoff volume from land development sites. Dry wells can be used to indirectly enhance
water quality by reducing the volume of stormwater runoff to be treated by other
downstream stormwater quality control measures.
A schematic of a typical dry well is presented in Figure E-4.
LID Ordinance Requirements
Dry wells can be used to meet the on-site retention requirements of the LID Ordinance.
Dry wells will prevent pollutants in the SWQDv from being discharged off-site.
Advantages
· Requires minimal space to install
· Low installation costs
· Provide groundwater recharge
· Reduces peak stormwater runoff flows during small storm events
County of Los Angeles
Figure E-
County of Los Angeles
-4. Dry Well Schematic
County of Los Angeles
. Dry Well Schematic
E-33
RETRET-4: Dry Well
February 2014
4: Dry Well
February 2014
RET-4: Dry Well
County of Los Angeles E-34 February 2014
Disadvantages
· Is not appropriate for areas with low permeability soils or high groundwater levels
· May not be appropriate for industrial sites or locations with contaminated soils or
where spills may occur because of the potential threat to groundwater
contamination
· Cannot receive untreated stormwater runoff except from rooftops
· Requires complete reconstruction for failed dry wells
· Is not suitable for fill sites or on steep slopes
General Constraints and Implementation Considerations
· Dry wells can be integrated into open space buffers and other landscape areas.
· The potential for groundwater contamination must be carefully considered,. Dry
wells are not suitable for sites that:
o Use or store chemicals or hazardous materials, unless they are prevented
from entering the well; or
o Un-remediated “brownfield sites” where there is known groundwater or soil
contamination
· Dry wells should be sited away from tree drip lines and kept free of vegetation.
· If the corrected in-situ infiltration rate exceed 2.4 in/hr, then stormwater runoff
may need to be fully-treated with an upstream stormwater quality control
measure prior to infiltration to protect groundwater quality.
· Dry wells cannot be located on sites with a slope greater than 20 percent (5:1).
· Pretreatment to remove sediment is required to protect dry wells from high
sediment loads.
· If a yard drain is proposed as part of the design, it must be designed so that any
standing water in the catch basin will infiltrate within 96 hours.
· If possible, the entire tributary area of the dry well should be stabilized before
construction begins. If this is not possible, all flows should be diverted around
the dry well to protect it from sediment loads during construction or the top two
inches of soil from the dry well bottom should be removed after the site has been
stabilized. Excavated material should be stored such that it cannot be washed
back into the dry well if a storm occurs during construction.
· The equipment used to construct the dry well should have extra wide low-
pressure tires. Construction traffic should not enter the dry well because it can
compact soil, which reduces infiltration capacity. If heavy equipment is used on
the base of the dry well, the infiltrative capacity may be restored by tilling or
aerating prior to placing the infiltrative bed.
RET-4: Dry Well
County of Los Angeles E-35 February 2014
· Clean, washed gravel should be placed in the excavated dry well in lifts and
lightly compacted with a plate compactor. Use of unwashed gravel can result in
clogging.
· A geomembrane liner should be installed generously with overlapping seams on
sides, bottom, and one foot below the surface of the dry well.
· Once construction is complete, stabilize the entire tributary area to the dry well
before allowing stormwater runoff to enter it.
· An observation well must be installed to check water levels, retention time, and
evidence of clogging.
· Accessibility for maintenance during dry and wet weather conditions must be
provided.
Design Specifications
The following sections provide design specifications for dry wells.
Geotechnical
Due to the potential to contaminate groundwater, cause slope instability, impact
surrounding structures, and potential for insufficient infiltration capacity, an extensive
geotechnical site investigation must be conducted during the site planning process to
verify site suitability for a dry well. All geotechnical investigations must be performed
according to the most recent GMED Policy GS 200.1. Soil infiltration rates and the
groundwater table depth must be evaluated to ensure that conditions are satisfactory for
proper operation of a dry well. The project applicant must demonstrate through
infiltration testing, soil logs, and the written opinion of a licensed civil engineer that
sufficiently permeable soils exist on-site to allow the construction of a properly
functioning dry well.
Dry wells are appropriate for soils with a minimum corrected in-situ infiltration rate of 0.3
in/hr. The geotechnical report must determine if the proposed project site is suitable for
a dry well and must recommend a design infiltration rate (see “Design Infiltration Rate”
under the “Sizing” section). The geotechnical investigation should be such that a good
understanding is gained as to how the stormwater runoff will move through the soil
(horizontally or vertically) and if there are any geological conditions that could inhibit the
movement of water.
Pretreatment
Pretreatment is important for all structural stormwater quality control measures, but it is
particularly important for retention facilities. Pretreatment refers to design features that
provide settling of large particles before stormwater runoff enters a stormwater quality
control measure in order to reduce the long-term maintenance burden. Pretreatment
should be provided to reduce the sediment load entering a dry well in order to maintain
the infiltration rate of the dry well. To ensure that dry wells are effective, the project
applicant must incorporate pretreatment devices that provide sediment reduction (e.g.,
RET-4: Dry Well
County of Los Angeles E-36 February 2014
vegetated swales, vegetated filter strips, sedimentation manholes, and proprietary
devices).
Setbacks
Dry wells must be sited following the setbacks from the most recent GMED Policy GS
200.1.
Geometry
· Dry well configurations vary, but generally have length and width top dimensions
close to a square. Prefabricated dry wells are often circular.
· The filter bed media layers must have the following composition and thickness,
unless they are prefabricated dry wells:
o Top layer: 2 inches of pea gravel
o Middle layer: 3 to 5 feet of washed 2- to 6-inch gravel; void spaces should
be approximately 30 to 40 percent
o Bottom layer: 6 inches of sand or geomembrane liner equivalent.
· Gravel media and prefabricated dry wells have porosities of 30 to 40 percent and
80 to 95 percent, respectively.
· If a dry well receives stormwater runoff from an underground pipe (i.e.,
stormwater runoff does not enter the top of the dry well from the ground surface),
a fine mesh screen should be installed at the inlet. The inlet elevation should be
18 inches below the ground surface (i.e., below 12 inches of surface soil and 6
inches of dry well media).
Sizing
Dry wells are sized using a simple sizing method where the SWQDv must be completely
infiltrated within 96 hours. Dry wells provide stormwater runoff storage in the voids of
the rock fill.
Step 1: Determine the SWQDv
Dry wells must be designed to capture and retain the SWQDv (see Section 6 for
SWQDv calculation procedures).
Step 2: Determine the design infiltration rate
Determine the corrected in-situ infiltration rate (fdesign) of the native soil using the
procedures described in the most recent GMED Policy GS 200.1.
RET-4: Dry Well
County of Los Angeles E-37 February 2014
Step 3: Calculate the surface area
Determine the required size of the infiltration surface by assuming the SWQDv will fill
the available void spaces of the gravel storage layer. The maximum depth of
stormwater runoff that can be infiltrated within the maximum retention time (96 hrs) is
calculated using the following equation:
=12 ×
Where:
dmax = Maximum depth of water that can be infiltrated within the required
drawdown time [ft];
fdesign = Design infiltration rate [in/hr]; and
t = Maximum retention time (max 96 hrs) [hr].
Select the dry well depth (dt) such that:
≤
Where:
dt = Depth of dry well fill [ft];
dmax = Maximum depth of water that can be infiltrated within the maximum
retention time [ft]; and
nt = Dry well fill porosity.
Calculate the infiltrating surface area (bottom of the dry well) required:
=×
Where:
A = Surface area of the bottom of the dry well [ft2];
SWQDv = Stormwater quality design volume [ft3]; and
dt = Depth of dry well fill [ft]; and
nt = Dry well fill porosity.
Flow Entrance and Energy Dissipation
Energy dissipation controls, constructed of sound materials such as stones, concrete, or
proprietary devices that are rated to withstand the energy of the influent flow, must be
installed at the inlet to the dry well. Consult with LACDPW for the type and design of
energy dissipation structure.
RET-4: Dry Well
County of Los Angeles E-38 February 2014
Drainage
The specifications for designing drainage systems for dry wells are presented below:
· The bottom of dry well must be native soil that is over-excavated at least one foot
in depth with the soil replaced uniformly without compaction. Amending the
excavated soil with two to four inches (~15 to 30 percent) of coarse sand is
recommended.
· The use of vertical piping, either for distribution or infiltration enhancement, is
prohibited. This application may be classified as a Class V Injection Well per 40
CFR Part 146.5(e)(4).
· The infiltration capacity of the subsurface layers should be sufficient to ensure a
maximum retention time of 96 hours. An observation well must be installed to
allow observation of retention time.
Hydraulic Restriction Layer
The entire infiltrative area, including the side walls must lined with a geomembrane liner
to prevent soil from migrating into the top layer and reducing storage capacity. The
specifications of the geomembrane liner are presented in Table E-7. The entire well
area, including the sides, must be lined with a geomembrane liner prior to placing the
media bed. Provide generous overlap at the seams.
Table E-7. Geomembrane Liner Specifications for Dry Wells
Parameter Test Method Specifications
Material Nonwoven geomembrane liner
Unit weight 8 oz/yd3 (minimum)
Filtration rate 0.08 in/sec (minimum)
Puncture strength ASTM D-751 (Modified) 125 lbs (minimum)
Mullen burst strength ASTM D-751 400 lb/in2 (minimum)
Tensile strength AST D-1682 300 lbs (minimum)
Equiv. opening size US Standard Sieve No. 80 (minimum)
Observation Well
The observation well is a vertical section of perforated PVC pipe, four- to six-inch
diameter, installed flush with the top of the dry well on a footplate and with a locking,
removable cap. The observation well is needed to monitor the infiltration rate in dry well
and is useful for marking the location of the dry well.
Vegetation
· Dry wells must be kept free of vegetation.
RET-4: Dry Well
County of Los Angeles E-39 February 2014
· Trees and other large vegetation should be planted away from dry well such that
drip lines do not overhang the infiltration area.
Restricted Construction Materials
Use of pressure-treated wood or galvanized metal at or around a dry well is prohibited.
Maintenance Access
The dry well must be safely accessible during wet and dry weather conditions if it is
publicly-maintained. If the dry well becomes plugged and fails, access is needed to
excavate the dry well and replace the filter bed media. To prevent damage and
compaction, access must able to accommodate a backhoe working at “arm’s length”
from the dry well.
Maintenance Requirements
Maintenance and regular inspections are important for proper function of dry wells. The
following are general maintenance requirements:
· Conduct regular inspection and routine maintenance for pretreatment devices.
· Inspect dry well and its observation well frequently to ensure that water infiltrates
into the subsurface completely within maximum retention time of 96 hours. If
water is present in the observation well more than 96 hours after a major storm,
the dry well may be clogged. Maintenance activities triggered by a potentially
clogged facility include:
o Check for debris/sediment accumulation and remove sediment (if any) and
evaluate potential sources of sediment and vegetative or other debris
(e.g., embankment erosion, channel scour, overhanging trees, etc). If
suspected upstream sources are outside of the County's jurisdiction,
additional pretreatment operations (e.g., trash racks, vegetated swales,
etc.) may be necessary.
o Assess the condition of the top aggregate layer for sediment buildup and
crusting. Remove the top layer of pea gravel and replace. If slow draining
conditions persist, the entire dry well may need to be excavated and
replaced.
· Eliminate standing water to prevent vector breeding.
· Remove and dispose of trash and debris as needed, but at least prior to the
beginning of the wet season.
A summary of potential problems that may need to be addressed by maintenance
activities is presented in Table E-8.
The County requires execution of a maintenance agreement to be recorded by the
property owner for the on-going maintenance of any privately-maintained stormwater
RET-4: Dry Well
County of Los Angeles E-40 February 2014
quality control measures. The property owner is responsible for compliance with the
maintenance agreement. A sample maintenance agreement is presented in Appendix
H.
Table E-8. Dry Well Troubleshooting Summary
Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is
Needed Maintenance Required
Trash and Debris Trash and debris > 5 ft3/1,000 ft2 Remove and dispose of trash
and debris.
Contaminants and Pollution Any evidence of oil, gasoline,
contaminants, or other pollutants
Remove any evidence of visual
contamination.
Erosion/Sediment
Accumulation
Undercut or eroded areas at inlet
structures
Repair eroded areas and re-
grade if necessary.
Accumulation of sediment, debris,
and oil/grease in pretreatment
devices
Remove sediment, debris, and/or
oil/grease.
Accumulation of sediment, debris,
and oil/grease on surface or inlet
Remove sediment, debris, and/or
oil/grease.
Water Drainage Rate Standing water, or by inspection of
observation wells
Remove the top layer of the dry
well bottom and replace if
necessary.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Appendix C:
Drywell System Information and Sizing
VTTM No. 83705
Drywell Calculations
CVC Job No. BORS-003
02/15/2022
Page 1 of 2
VTTM No. 83705
8601 Mission Drive, Rosemead, CA
Drywell Calculations
Infiltration Rate was determined by project’s geotechnical engineer. The Site is located within Soil Type
6 per LA County Hydrology Maps. The average measured Infiltration Rate of site soils was calculated as
17.0-inches per hour per the Geotechnical Investigation Results prepared by Albus & Associates, Inc. A
factor of safety of 2 was applied to the assumed measured rate for a design infiltration rate (KDESIGN) =
8.5 in/hr
All Drywell Systems have been located at least 10’ from building foundations.
The volume statically held within the drywell system includes the volume held by the gravel drywell
(void ratio = 0.35) and the volume held by the 10’ sumps below the inlet pipes to the Primary Chamber
and the Settling Chamber. Upstream Detention Pipe storage will be provided for the required amount of
volume not statically held within each drywell system. Refer to the drywell details on the following
pages for more information.
Historic high depth of groundwater is 60’ below existing ground surface. However, per nearby
groundwater wells indicate that groundwater is at a depth of 231’ below ground surface. Groundwater
was not encountered at a depth of 51.5’ below ground surface during the Geotechnical Investigation
conducted by Albus & Associates, Inc.
48-hour Drawdown timeframe utilized
DMA A1
A = 3.38 ac
DCV = 8,630 cf
Maxwell Plus Drywell System with the following properties:
25’ depth* Primary Chamber at 4’ diameter (10’ static storage depth)
25’ depth* Settling Chamber at 4’ diameter (10’ static storage depth)
20’ Drywell at 6’ diameter
Inlet pipe at invert 15’ below FS
ddrywell infiltration= (dsettling-dslurry) + ddrywell
= (25’ – 13’) + (20’) = 32’
Total Depth (overall depth) = dsettling + ddrywell
= 25’ + 20’ = 45’
Storage Calculations
VSETTLING *= πr²(dstatic settling) = π(2 ft)²(10 ft) = 126 cf
VPRIMARY *= πr²(dstatic primary) = π(2 ft))²(10 ft) = 126 cf
VDRYWELL = πr²(ddrywell infiltration)(n) = π(3 ft)²(25 ft)(0.35) = 198 cf
where, r = radius (ft), d = depth (ft), n = Void Space (0.35) per manufacturer’s specifications
∑Volume = 126 cf + 126 cf + 198 cf = 449 cf
*Only the portion below the inlet pipe for the Primary Chamber and the Settling Chamber was included for static
storage calculation of drywell system.
Required Detention Vault Storage = DCV - ∑V = 8,630 cf – 449 cf = 8,180 cf
Provided 8’x8’x10’ BioClean Urbanpond Detention System
Storage Per Module = 596 cf / module
Modules provided = 14 modules
VTTM No. 83705
Drywell Calculations
CVC Job No. BORS-003
02/15/2022
Page 2 of 2
V = (596 cf / module)*(14 modules) = 8,344 cf > 8,180 cf
Infiltration Calculations
V48-HR = (1 ft/ 12 in)(KDESIGN, in/hr)(SA, sf)(48 hr), where SA = Infiltrating Surface Area of Drywell
SA = πr² + 2π(r)(ddrywell infiltration) = π(3 ft)² + 2(π)(3 ft)(32 ft) = 631.5 sf
where, r = radius (ft), ddrywell infiltration = depth of drywell infiltration zone (ft)
V48-HR = (1 ft/12 in)(8.5 in/hr)(631.5 sf)(48 hr) = 21,469 cf > DCV = 8,630 cf
TheMaxWell®Plus,asmanufacturedandinstalledexclusivelyby
TorrentResources Incorporated, is the industry standard for draining large
paved surfaces,nuisancewaterandotherdemandingapplications.This
patentedsystemincorporatesstate-of-the-artpre-treatmenttechnology.
THEULTIMATEINDESIGN
Since 1974, nearly 65,000 MaxWell®Systems have proven their value as a
cost-effective solution in a wide variety of drainage applications. They are
acceptedbystateandmunicipalagenciesandareastandarddetailinnumerous
drainagemanuals.Manymunicipalitieshaverecognizedtheinherentbenefits
oftheMaxWellPlusandnowrequireitfordrainageofallpavedsurfaces.
SUPERIORPRE-TREATMENT
Industryresearch,togetherwithTorrentResources’ownexperience,haveshown
thatinitialstormdrainageflowshavethegreatestimpactonsystemperformance.
This“firstflush”occursduringthefirstfewminutesofrunoff,andcarriesthe
majority of sediment and debris. Larger paved surfaces or connecting pipes
from catch basins, underground storage, etc. can also generate high peak
flows which may strain system function. In addition, nuisance water flows
requirecontrolledprocessingseparatefromnormalstormrunoffdemands.
Inthe MaxWell®Plus,preliminary treatment is provided through
collectionandseparationindeeplarge-volumesettlingchambers.Thestandard
MaxWellPlusSystemhasover2,500gallonsofcapacitytocontainsedimentand
debriscarriedbyincomingwater.Floatingtrash,paper,pavementoil,etc.are
effectivelystoppedbythe PureFlo®DebrisShieldsineachchamber.Theseshield-
ingdevicesareequippedwithaneffectivescreentofiltersuspendedmaterialand
areventedtopreventsiphoningoffloatingsurfacedebrisasthesystemdrains.
EFFECTIVEPROCESSING
Incomingwaterfromthesurfacegratedinletsorconnectingpipesisreceived
in the Primary Settling Chamber where silt and other heavy particles settle to
thebottom.APureFloDebrisShieldensurescontainmentbytrappingfloating
debrisandpavementoil.Thepre-treatedflowisthenregulatedtoadesignrate
ofupto0.25cfsanddirectedtoaSecondarySettlingChamber.Thesettlingand
containment process is repeated, thereby effectively achieving controlled,
uniformtreatment.ThesystemisdrainedaswaterrisesunderthePureFloDebris
Shieldandspillsintothetopoftheoverflowpipe.Thedrainageassemblyreturns
thecleanedwaterintothesurroundingsoilthroughtheFloFast®DrainageScreen.
ABSORBENTTECHNOLOGY
BothMaxWellPlussettlingchambersareequippedwithabsorbentspongesto
providepromptremovalofpavementoils.Thesefloatingpillow-likedevicesare
100%waterrepellentandliterallywickpetrochemicalcompoundsfromthewater.
Each sponge has a capacity of up to 128 ounces to accommodate effective,
long-termtreatment.Theabsorbentiscompletelyinertandwillsafelyremove
runoffconstituentsdowntorainbowsheensthataretypicallynomorethanone
moleculethick.
SECURITYFEATURES
MaxWellPlusSystemsincludebolted,theft-deterrent,castirongratingsand
covers as standard security features. Special inset castings which are resistant
tolooseningfromaccidentalimpactareavailableforuseinlandscaped applica-
tions. Machined mating surfaces and “Storm Water Only” wording are standard.
ManufacturedandInstalledExclusivelybyTorrentResourcesIncorporated
Pleaseseereversesideforadditionalinformation
U.S.PatentNo.4,923,330
®
INDUSTRYSERVICES
Site Drainage Systems
Stormwater Drywells
French Drains
Piping
Drainage Appurtenances
Pump Systems
Technical Analysis
Design Review
Percolation Testing
Geologic Database
ADEQ Drywell Registration
Recharge Systems
Municipal/Private Recharge Wells
Injection Wells & Galleries
Environmental Applications
Pattern Drilling/Soil Remediation
Drainage Rehabilitation
Drywell Abandonments
OSHA HAZMAT-Certified
Drainage Renovation
Problem Assessment
Site Redesign/Modification
System Retrofit
Drainage Maintenance
Preventive Maintenance
Service Contracts
Drywell Cleaning
TORRENTRESOURCESINCORPORATED
1509 East Elwood Street
Phoenix Arizona 85040~1391
phone 602~268~0785
fax 602~268~0820
Nevada
702~366~1234
AZ Lic.ROC070465 A,
ROC047067 B-4; ADWR 363
CA Lic.528080 A, C-42, HAZ
NV Lic.0035350 A
NM Lic.90504 GF04
Thewatermarkfordrainagesolutions.®
THEMAXWELLFIVE-YEARWARRANTY
Innovative engineering, quality materials and exacting construction
are standard with every MaxWell System designed,manufactured
and installed by Torrent ResourcesIncorporated. TheMaxWell Drainage
SystemsWarrantyisthebest in the industry and guarantees against
failures due to workmanship or materials for a period of five years
fromdateofcompletion.
1/12
MaxWell®Plus DRAINAGE SYSTEM
Product Information and Design Features
TORRENTRESOURCES(CA)INCORPORATED
phone 661~947~9836
CA Lic.886759 A, C-42
www.TorrentResources.com
AnevolutionofMcGuckinDrilling
114188b:0084318b2 1/11/12 1:25 PM Page 1
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Appendix D:
“NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO OCEAN” Stencil Examples
Sample Stencil 1
Sample Stencil 2
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Appendix E:
Catch Basin Cleaning
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE OF
FLO-GARDTM+PLUS CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTERS
SCOPE:
Federal, State and Local Clean Water Act regulations and those of insurance carriers require that
stormwater filtration systems be maintained and serviced on a recurring basis. The intent of the regulations
is to ensure that the systems, on a continuing basis, efficiently remove pollutants from stormwater runoff
thereby preventing pollution of the nation’s water resources. These Specifications apply to the Flo-GardTM
+Plus Catch Basin Insert Filter.
RECOMMENDED FREQUENCY OF SERVICE:
Drainage Protection Systems (DPS) recommends that installed Flo-GardTM +Plus Catch Basin Insert Filters
be serviced on a recurring basis. Ultimately, the frequency depends on the amount of runoff, pollutant
loading and interference from debris (leaves, vegetation, cans, paper, etc.); however, it is recommended
that each installation be serviced a minimum of three times per year, with a change of filter medium once
per year. DPS technicians are available to do an on-site evaluation, upon request.
RECOMMENDED TIMING OF SERVICE:
DPS guidelines for the timing of service are as follows:
1. For areas with a definite rainy season: Prior to, during and following the rainy season.
2. For areas subject to year-round rainfall: On a recurring basis (at least three times per year).
3. For areas with winter snow and summer rain: Prior to and just after the snow season and during
the summer rain season.
4. For installed devices not subject to the elements (washracks, parking garages, etc.): On a recurring
basis (no less than three times per year).
SERVICE PROCEDURES:
1. The service shall commence with collection and removal of sediment and debris (litter, leaves,
papers, cans, etc.) and broom sweeping around the drainage inlet. Accumulated materials shall be
placed in a DOT approved container for later disposal.
2. The catch basin shall be visually inspected for defects and possible illegal dumping. If illegal
dumping has occurred, the proper authorities and property owner representative shall be notified
as soon as practicable.
3. The catch basin grate shall be removed and set to one side. Using an industrial vacuum, the
collected materials shall be removed from the liner. (Note: DPS uses a truck-mounted vacuum for
servicing Flo-Gard TM +Plus catch basin inserts.)
4. When all of the collected materials have been removed, the filter medium pouches shall be
removed by unsnapping the tether from the D-ring and set to one side. The filter liner, gaskets,
stainless steel frame and mounting brackets, etc. shall be inspected for continued serviceability.
Minor damage or defects found shall be corrected on-the-spot and a notation made on the
Maintenance Record. More extensive deficiencies that affect the efficiency of the filter (torn liner,
etc.), if approved by the customer representative, will be corrected and an invoice submitted to the
representative along with the Maintenance Record.
5. The filter medium pouches shall be inspected for defects and continued serviceability and replaced
as necessary and the pouch tethers re-attached to the liner’s D-ring. See below.
6. The grate shall be replaced.
EXCHANGE AND DISPOSAL OF EXPOSED FILTER MEDIUM AND COLLECTED DEBRIS
The frequency of filter medium pouch exchange will be in accordance with the existing DPS-Customer
Maintenance Contract. DPS recommends that the medium be changed at least once per year. During the
appropriate service, or if so determined by the service technician during a non-scheduled service, the filter
medium pouches will be replaced with new pouches and the exposed pouches placed in the DOT approved
container, along with the exposed debris. Once the exposed pouches and debris have been placed in the
container, DPS has possession and must dispose of it in accordance with local, state and federal agency
requirements.
Note: As the generator, the landowner is ultimately responsible for the proper disposal of the exposed
filter medium and debris. Because the materials likely contain petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals
and other harmful pollutants, the materials must be treated as an EPA Class 2 Hazardous Waste and
properly disposed of. DPS relieves the landowner of the actual disposal task, and provides certification
of its completion in accordance with appropriate regulations.
DPS also has the capability of servicing all manner of catch basin inserts and catch basins without
inserts, underground oil/water separators, stormwater interceptors and other such devices. All DPS
personnel are highly qualified technicians and are confined space trained and certified. Call us at
(888) 950-8826 for further information and assistance.
05/04/04
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Appendix F:
General Education Materials
Wipe pots, pans,
and work areas
prior to washing.
Do not pour
cooking residue
directly into
the drain.
Do not pour waste
oil directly into the
drain, parking lot
or street.
Do not wash floor
mats outside where
water will run off
directly into the
storm drain.
Do not rinse spills
into the street.
1 2
2
3
3
4
41Dispose of food
waste directly
into the trash.
Avoid using the
garbage disposal.
Place greasy food
in the trash.
Clean mats inside
over a utility sink.
Use dry clean up
for spills.
Collect waste
oil and store
for recycling.
THE
RIGHT WAY
THE
WRONG WAY
Good Cleaning Practices
Managing FATS,OIL and GREASE
POST IN CLEANUP/WORK AREA
www.lacsd.org
PUBLIC WORKS
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works
For more information call (888) CLEAN LA or visit www.888CleanLA.com
Are You a Litter B
u
g
A r e Y o u a L i t t e r B u g
and a n d DoDo n’t Know It?t K n o w I t ?
Take our quiz!
Have you ever...
• Dropped a cigarette butt or trash on the grou
n
d
?
• Failed to pick up after your dog while out on
a
w
a
l
k
?
• Overwatered your lawn after ap
p
l
y
i
ng
fertilizers/pesticides?
• Disposed of used motor oil in the s
t
r
e
e
t
,
gutter or garbage?
If you answered yes to any of these action
s
,
t
h
e
n
YOU ARE A LITTER BUG!
Each of these behaviors contribute to stor
m
w
a
t
e
r
pollution, which contaminates o
u
r
o
c
e
a
n
a
n
d
waterways, kills marine life and causes beach
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
s
.
You can become part of the solution!
To find out how, flip this card over.
For more information, c
a
l
l
o
r
v
i
s
i
t
:
Follow these simple steps to
prevent stormwater pollution
• Put your garbage wh
e
r
e
i
t
b
e
l
o
n
g
s
—
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
ash can.
• Pick up after your dog
w
h
e
n
out on a walk.
• Reduce pesticide and
f
e
r
t
i
l
i
z
e
r
u
s
e
;
d
o
n
’
t
o
v
e
r
w
a
t
e
r
after application or apply if rain is
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
.
• Dispose of used motor oil at an oil
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
c
e
n
t
e
r
or at a free Househo
l
d
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
W
aste/E-Waste
collection event.
A message from the Cou
n
t
y
o
f
Los Angeles Department of Public Works.
Printed on recycled paper.
Follow these simple step
s
t
o
F ol lo w t h es e s i m p l e s t e p s t o
prevent stormwater po
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
pre v e n t s to rmw a te r p ol lu t i on:
DoDon’t Paint the’t Paint the Town Red!Town Red!
Storm drains are for rain…
they’re not for paint disposal.
More than 197,000 times each month, L.A. County residents
wash their dirty paint brushes under an outdoor faucet.
This dirty rinse water flows into the street, down the
storm drain and straight to the ocean — untreated.
Remember to clean water-based paint brushes in the
sink, rinse oil-based paint brushes with paint thinner, and
take old paint and paint-related products to a Household
Hazardous Waste/E-Waste collection event.
Tips for Paint Clean-Up:
L.A. County residents
c
a
n
h
e
l
p
s
o
l
v
e
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
pollution problem by t
a
k
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
e
e
a
s
y
s
t
e
p
s
w
h
e
n
working with paint an
d
p
a
i
n
t
-
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
…
• Never dispose of paint or paint-relat
e
d
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
gutters or storm drains. This is called illegal dumping.
Take them to a House
h
o
l
d
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
W
a
s
t
e
/
E
-
W
a
s
t
e
collection event. Ca
l
l
1
(
8
8
8
)
C
L
E
A
N
L
A
o
r
visit
www.888CleanLA.com
t
o
l
o
c
a
t
e
a
n
e
v
e
n
t
n
e
a
r
y
o
u
.
• Buy only what you need. Reuse leftover paint for
touch-ups or donate
i
t
t
o
a
l
o
c
a
l
g
r
a
f
f
i
t
i
a
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
program. Recycle or u
s
e
e
x
c
e
s
s
p
a
i
n
t
.
• Clean water-based pa
i
n
t
b
r
u
s
h
es in the sink.
• Oil-based paints shou
l
d
b
e
c
l
e
a
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
p
a
i
n
t
t
h
inner.
Filter and reuse paint
t
h
i
n
n
e
r
.
S
e
t
t
h
e
u
s
e
d
t
h
i
n
n
e
r
aside in a closed jar t
o
s
e
t
t
l
e
-
o
u
t
p
a
i
n
t
p
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
s
.
• Store paints and pain
t
-
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
i
n
r
i
g
i
d
,
durable and watertight co
n
t
a
i
n
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
tight-fitting covers.
A message from the Cou
n
t
y
o
f
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
l
e
s
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f Public Works.
Printed on recycled paper.
Storm drains are for rain…
they’re not pooper scoopers.
L.A. County residents walk a dog without picking up
the droppings more than 62,000 times per month.
Disease-causing dog waste washes from the
ground and streets into storm drains and
flows straight to the ocean — untreated.
Remember to bring a bag and
clean up after your dog.
PP ickick UpUp AfterAfter YourYour Pooch!Pooch!
Dog owners can help so
l
v
e
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
problem by taking thes
e
e
a
s
y
s
t
e
p
s
…
• Clean up after your
d
o
g
e
v
e
r
y
s
i
n
gle time.
• Take advantage of the complimentary waste bags
offered in dispensers at local parks.
• Ensure you always have extra bags in your car so
you are prepared when you travel with your do
g.
• Carry extra bags when walking your dog and make
them available to other
p
e
t
o
w
n
e
r
s
w
h
o
a
r
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
.
• Teach children how
t
o
p
r
o
p
e
r
l
y
c
l
e
a
n
u
p
a
f
ter a pet.
Encourage them to throw
t
h
e
u
s
e
d
b
a
g
s
i
n
t
h
e
nearest trash receptacl
e
i
f
t
h
e
y
a
re away from home.
• Put a friendly message on the bulletin board at
the local dog park to
r
e
m
i
n
d
p
et owners to clean
up after their dogs.
• Te ll friends and neighbors abo
u
t
t
h
e
i
ll effects of
animal waste on the environment.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
them to clean up after t
h
e
i
r
p
e
t
s
a
s
w
e
l
l
.
Tips for Dog Owners:
SwimmingPool Tips•Make sure allchemicals aredissipated beforedraining a pool orspa •Do not drain poolswithin 5 days ofadding chemicals•Never backwash afilter into the streetor stormdrain •Cleanup chemicalspills withabsorbent, don’twash it down thedrain•Dispose of leftoverchemicals and paintsthrough a licensedhazardous wastedisposal providerFollow these simple steps toprevent stormwater pollution…Stormdrainstake runoffdirectly to creeksand the ocean without treatment.Pool chemicals can harm ournatural creeks and waterways.Anything going into ourstormdrains that isn’trainwater contributes tostormwater pollution, whichcontaminates our creeks andocean, kills marine life andcauses beach closures....not pool chemicalsStorm Drains arefor Rain...SwimmingPool Tips
•Make sure all
chemicals are
dissipated beforedraining a pool or
spa
•Do not drain poolswithin 5 days of
adding chemicals
•Never backwash afilter into the street
or stormdrain
•Cleanup chemical
spills with
absorbent, don’twash it down the
drain
•Dispose of leftoverchemicals and paints
through a licensedhazardous waste
disposal provider
Follow these simple steps to
prevent stormwater pollution…
Printed on recycled paper
Stormdrainstake runoffdirectly to the ocean without
treatment. Pool chemicalscan harm our natural creeks
and waterways. Anythinggoing into our stormdrains
that isn’t rainwatercontributes to stormwater
pollution, which contaminates
our creeks and ocean, killsmarine life and causes beach
closures.
...not pool chemicals
Storm Drains arefor Rain...
AA YardYard is ais a Terrible Terrible
ThingThing toto Waste!Waste!
Storm drains are for rain…not yard waste.
Residential yard waste represents about 13 percent
of the total waste generated in L.A. County.
Pesticides, fertilizer and yard waste such as leaves and
mowed grass wash from the ground and streets into storm
drains and flow straight to the ocean — untreated.
Remember to use pesticides and fertilizer
wisely and pick-up yard waste.
Tips For Yard Care:
L.A. County residents
c
a
n
h
e
l
p
solve the stormwater
pollution problem by tak
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
e
e
a
s
y
s
t
e
p
s
…
• Do not over-fertilize and do not use fertilizer or
p
e
s
ticides
near ditches, gutters or storm drains.
• Do not use fertilizer or pesticides before a rain.
• Follow the directions on the label carefully.
• Use pesticides sparingly — more is not better.
“Spot” apply, rather tha
n
“
b
l
a
n
k
e
t
”
a
p
ply.
• When watering your lawn, use the least amount of
water possible so it do
e
s
n
’
t
r
u
n
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
c
a
r
r
y
i
n
g
pesticides and other chemicals with it.
• Use non-toxic products for your garden and
l
awn
whenever possible.
• If you must store pesticides or fertilizer, make sur
e
they are in a sealed, w
a
t
e
r
-
p
r
o
o
f
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
r
i
n
a
covered area to prevent ru
n
o
ff.
• Do not blow, sweep, hose o
r
r
a
k
e
l
e
a
v
e
s
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
yard trimmings into the street, gutter
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
.
A message from the Cou
n
t
y
o
f
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
l
e
s
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f Public Works.
Printed on recycled paper.
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Appendix G:
Operation and Maintenance Plan
To be provided during Final Engineering
Preliminary Low Impact Development Plan
8601 Mission Drive
Rosemead, California
Mission Villas, LLC February 2022
Appendix H:
Geotechnical Report
1011 N. Armando Street, Anaheim, CA 92806-2606 (714) 630-1626
October, 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Mr. Erik Pfahler
Borstein Enterprises
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Water Quality
Improvements, Proposed Residential Development, 8601 Mission Drive,
Rosemead, California
Dear Mr. Pfahler,
Albus & Associates, Inc. has completed a geotechnical investigation of the site for evaluation of the
percolation characteristics of the site soils. The scope of this investigation consisted of the following:
Exploratory drilling, soil sampling and test well installation
Field percolation testing
Laboratory testing of selected soil samples
Engineering analysis of the data
Preparation of this report
SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Location and Description
The site is located at 8601 Mission Drive within the city of Rosemead, California. The APN parcel
numbers for the current development are 5389-009-029, -030, and -031. The property is bordered by
Mission Drive to the south, Walnut Grove Avenue, an existing easement for power lines, and a nursery
to the west, and single-family residences to the north and east. The location of the site and its
relationship to the surrounding areas are shown in Figure 1, Site Location Map.
The site consists of an irregularly-shaped property containing approximately 3.35 acres of land. The
site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 357 to 363 feet above mean sea level (based on
Google Earth) and slopes gently down to the south. The site is currently vacant land with some
improvements onsite. The perimeters of the site are bounded by chain-link fencing, masonry block
walls, and plastic fencing. A short concrete driveway is located to the south and west. Along the
southwest boundary of the property is existing overhead powerlines. Vegetation within the site
consists of minor ground cover and some large palm trees within the southwest portion of the site.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 2
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
© 2021 Google
N
FIGURE 1-SITE LOCATION MAP
Proposed Residential Development
8601 Mission Drive,
Rosemead, California
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed Development
Based on our understanding, site development is anticipated to consist of multi-story (2 to 3), wood-
framed buildings at grade. Associated interior driveways, decorative hardscape, parking areas and
underground utilities are also anticipated.
No grading or structural plans were available in preparing this proposal. However, we anticipate some
minor cut and filling of the site will be required to achieve future surface configuration and we expect
future foundation loads will be moderate.
SITE
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 3
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SUMMARY OF FIELD AND LABORATORY WORK
Subsurface Investigation
Subsurface exploration for this investigation was conducted on September 7, 2021, and consisted of
drilling six (6) soil borings to depths ranging from approximately 11.5 to 51.5 feet below the existing
ground surface (bgs). The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted, continuous flight, hollow-
stem-auger drill rig. A representative of Albus & Associates, Inc. logged the exploratory borings.
Visual and tactile identifications were made of the materials encountered, and their descriptions are
presented in the Exploration Logs in Appendix A. The approximate locations of the exploratory
excavations completed by this firm are shown on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1.
Bulk, relatively undisturbed and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samples were obtained at selected
depths within the exploratory borings for subsequent laboratory testing. Relatively undisturbed
samples were obtained using a 3-inch O.D., 2.5-inch I.D., California split-spoon soil sampler lined
with brass rings. SPT samples were obtained from the boring using a standard, unlined SPT soil
sampler. During each sampling interval, the sampler was driven 18 inches with successive drops of a
140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler
was recorded for each six inches of advancement. The total blow count for the lower 12 inches of
advancement per soil sample is recorded on the exploration log. Samples were placed in sealed
containers or plastic bags and transported to our laboratory for analyses. The borings were backfilled
with auger cuttings upon completion of sampling.
Two additional borings (P-1 and P-2) were drilled adjacent to boring B-1 for percolation testing. Upon
completion of drilling, well materials were installed within P-1 and P-2 for subsequent percolation
testing. Construction details for P-1 and P-2 consisted of 15 and 30 feet of well materials. The bottom
5 feet for both wells utilized perforated 3-inch-diameter pipe with the remaining well utilizing solid
3-inch-diameter pipe to ground surface. The joints between pipes were reinforced with duct tape and
the sections of perforated pipe were covered with filter sock. After installation of pipe, ¾” gravel was
used to fill the annular space around the perforated sections. Upon completion of testing, all well
materials were removed from the borings and then backfilled with soil cuttings.
Percolation Testing
Percolation testing was performed on September 7, 2021, in general conformance with the constant-
head test procedures outlined in the referenced Well Permeameter Method (USBR 7300-89). A water
hose attached to a water source on site was connected to an inline flowmeter to measure the water
flow. The flowmeter is capable of measuring flow rates up to 10 gallons per minute and as low as
0.06 gallons per minute. A valve was connected in line with the flowmeter to control the flow rate.
A filling hose was used to connect the flowmeter and the test wells. Water was introduced by the
filling hose near the bottom of the test wells. A water level meter with 1/100-foot divisions was used
to measure the depths to water surface from the top of well casings.
Flow to the wells was terminated upon either completion of testing of all the pre-determined water
levels or the flow rate exceeded the maximum capacity of the flowmeter. Measurements obtained
during the percolation testing are provided in Appendix C on Plates C-1 and C-2.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 4
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Laboratory Testing
Selected soil samples of representative earth materials were tested to assist in the formulation of
conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. Tests consisted of in-situ moisture contents
and dry densities, 200 washes and sieve analyses. Results of laboratory testing relevant to percolation
characteristics are presented in Appendix B and on the Exploration Logs in Appendix A.
ANALYSIS OF DATA
Subsurface Conditions
Review of the Diblee Map for the El Monte and Baldwin Park Quadrangles shows the site is designated
as Quaternary Alluvium and falls within a flood plain and would have been subjected to seasonally-
deposited materials associated with heavy rains from nearby mountain ranges to the north. Our
exploration encountered artificial fills overlaying alluvial soils. Descriptions of the earth materials
encountered during our investigation are summarized below and are presented in detail on the
Exploration Logs presented in Appendix A.
Fills up to about 2 feet thick appear to be present on site due to previous site improvements and
grading. Fill materials typically consisted of fine to medium-grained silty sands.
Alluvium was encountered underlying the artificial fill and generally consisted of interlayered silty
sands, sands with silt, gravelly sands, and clayey sands. These materials were typically medium dense
to very dense and damp. Alluvial soils were encountered to the maximum depth explored (51.5 feet).
Within borings B-2 and B-3, cobbles were encountered at depths of approximately 10 feet. Due to the
size of the cobbles, the hollow stem could not extract all the cobbles. As such, the cobbles generally
remained within the borings and floated within the cuttings and around the stem. Sizes were either
measured or visually observed within the boring shaft and are estimated to be 4 to 6 inches in diameter.
Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered during this firm’s subsurface exploration to a depth of 51.5 feet.
The CDMG Special Report 024 suggests that historic high groundwater for the subject site is
approximately 60 feet. However, review of the Los Angeles County groundwater level data for the
nearby well 2920G indicates that groundwater for the area is 231 feet below ground surface as of 2018.
Well readings have been recorded from 5/1/1949 to 4/26/2018, and during this period, groundwater
has fluctuated, but has continued to increase in depth from 126 feet (bgs) to 231 feet (bgs) during this
time period. The last recorded reading at the time of this report was April 26, 2018 and indicated a
depth of 231 feet.
Percolation Data
Analyses were performed to evaluate permeability using the flow rate obtained at the end of the
constant-head stage of field percolation testing. These analyses were performed in accordance with
the procedures provided in the referenced USBR 7300-89. The procedure essentially uses a closed-
form solution to the percolation out of a small-diameter well.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 5
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Using the USBR method, we calculated a composite permeability value for the head conditions
maintained in the wells. The results are summarized in Table 1 below and the supporting analyses are
included in Appendix C, Plates C-3 and C-4. Comparing the results of grain-size testing confirms the
field test results are appropriate for the soils tested.
TABLE 1
Summary of Back-Calculated Permeability Coefficient
Test Well
Total Depth
of Well
(ft)
Depth to
Water in
Well
(ft)
Height of
Water in
Well
(ft)
Static Flow
Rate
(gal./min.)
Estimated
Permeability,
ks
(in/hr.)
P-1 14.7 12 2.7 4.7 18.34
P-2 30 27 3 0.68 2.26
Design of Dry Well
The infiltration rate in a dry well is dependent upon several factors including the soil permeabilities
of the various soil layers throughout the soil mass, hydraulic gradient of water pressure head in the
soil mass, and depth to groundwater. The infiltration rate is related to the permeability by Darcy’s
equation:
V ki
Where:
V= water velocity (infiltration rate)
k= permeability
i=hydraulic gradient
The presence of differing soil layers with differing permeabilities, the variable head condition in the
well shaft, and presence of ground water are factors that make determining the effective infiltration
rate of a dry well somewhat complicated. We have performed the Well Permeameter tests in
accordance with the test method. This test provides a means to estimate the Permeability Rate of the
soils influencing the dry well, not the infiltration rate. Therefore, the effective infiltration rate must
be determined using the relationship between permeability and infiltration rate as expressed by
Darcy’s equation. Solution of the Darcy equation essentially requires solving a differential mass
balance equation. Due to these complications, the infiltration characteristics of the proposed dry well
were modeled using a computer program.
Infiltration in a dry well was modeled using the software Seep/W, version 2007, by Geo-Slope
International. The program allows for modeling of both partially-saturated and saturated porous
medium using a finite element approach to solve Darcy’s Law. The program can evaluate both steady-
state and transient flow in planar and axisymmetric cases. Boundaries of the model can be identified
with various conditions including fix total head, fix pressure head, fix flow rate, and head as a function
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 6
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
of flow. Soil permeability properties can be modeled with either Fredlund et al (1994), Green and
Corey (1971), Van Genuchten (1980), or Saxton et al. (1986). Only saturated permeabilities were
used in our analyses.
A Seep/W model was setup with the bottom of the dry well at a depth of 40 feet below ground surface.
The dry well was assumed to consist of a shaft that is 6 feet in diameter and contains a settling chamber
having an inside diameter of 4 feet, outside diameter of 4.5 feet, and length of 18 feet. The annular
space around the chamber between the depths of 0 and 13 feet was assumed to consist of a cement
slurry. A more detailed model of the dry well design can be found on Plate 2.
The model consisted of three zones of material to represent the general soil profile. The saturated
permeability of material 1 was modeled to be impermeable and represent the future artificial fills. The
saturated permeability of the primary infiltration zones, materials 2 and 3, were selected based on the
coefficient of permeability estimated from percolation tests as well as laboratory gradation test results.
The saturated permeability of material 4 was modeled to represent the clayey sand materials
encountered at depth. The permeability values are summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Summary of Permeability Values
Depth
(ft)
Material
No. Material Type
Sat.
Perm.,
Ks
(in/hr)
0-5 1 Fill 0.001
5-15 2 SW 15
15-45 3 SP/SM 2
>45 4 SC 0.01
Water in the well was assumed to be at a depth of 7 feet below the ground surface so a fix-head
boundary was set with a total head elevation of 93 feet around the edge of the well (ground surface
was set to an elevation of 100 feet).
A steady state analysis was performed to estimate the maximum inflow that the well can accommodate.
Using a well as described above, we obtain a static total flow of 0.16 ft³/sec. A plot depicting the
resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors for the model is provided on Plate C-5. The average
infiltration rate can be determined by taking the flow rate divided by the wetted surface area. The
surface area is equal to 395.8 square feet which includes the side and bottom area. Based on the above
flow rate and surface area, the average “measured” infiltration rate across the wetted surface area is
17.0 in/hr.
To evaluate the time required to empty the well once no more water is introduced, the model was
reanalyzed with a variable head condition that was dependent upon the volume of water leaving the
well. As water infiltrates into the surrounding soil, the volume of water remaining in the well is
reduced as well as the resulting water head. A graph of the well head versus exit volume is provided
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 7
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
in Figure 2. The function assumes a void ratio of 0.4 within the zones occupied by gravel. If some
other well configuration is used, then the analyses will require updating.
The analysis was performed as a transient case over a total time of 2.5 hours. The conditions in the
model were evaluated in 10 increments of time over the total duration. From our analyses, the water
is evacuated from the chamber in approximately 0.55 hours. Plots depicting the resulting pressure
head contours and flow vectors at selected times are provided in Appendix C on Plates C-6 through
C-9. A plot of time versus water height in the well is shown on Figure 3.
FIGURE 2- Well Head versus Exit Volume
FIGURE 3- Water Head Versus Time
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Total Head (ft)Volume (ft3)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
00.511.522.5Height of Water in Well (ft)Time (hrs)
Water Chamber Bottom Chamber Empty
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 8
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Dry Well
Results of our work indicate a storm water disposal system consisting of a dry well is feasible at the
site. The use of a dry well is not anticipated to result in worsening any adverse conditions or hazards
that may be present for the proposed site development or adjacent properties including subsidence,
landsliding, or liquefaction. As discussed above, the historic groundwater level in this area is
approximately 60 feet. However, based on the aforementioned well data, we estimate that
groundwater is currently at least 230 feet below ground surface and we anticipate will remain at least
200 feet below ground surface for the life of the project. Therefore, a dry well having a total depth of
40 feet will maintain a clearance above groundwater greater than the minimum required clearance of
10 feet.
Based on the results of percolation testing and analyses, the well configuration as depicted on Plate 2
may utilize a “measured” peak flow rate of 0.16 ft³/sec. This flow rate corresponds to an average peak
infiltration rate of 17.0 in./hr. This flow rate and infiltration rate only apply to the well configuration
evaluated and will differ for other configurations. These values are “measured” values and as such,
an appropriate factor of safety should be applied to determine the “design” rates.
The design infiltration rate requires the application of a Reduction Factor in accordance with the
County of Los Angeles GS200.2 guidelines. Based on the county requirements, the reduction factor
(safety factor) is determined by multiplying the partial reduction factors as indicated in Table 3 below.
The RFt value is prescribed by the test method used. The RFv value is based on the fact that soil
conditions are uniform within the infiltration zone, that a test was performed in close proximity to the
proposed dry well location, and correlations with laboratory testing of site materials confirm the
selected permeability rate obtained by the field test. The RFs value is based on the dry well providing
a chamber that traps sediments and removes oils via an absorptive pillow or some other system
providing for the removal of most sediment and oils before entering the dry well.
TABLE 3
Reduction Factor
Factor Value
RFt 2.0
RFv 1.0
RFs 1.0
Total Reduction Factor (RF) 2.0
Note:
Total Reduction Factor, RF= RFt x RFv x RFs
Based on the above reduction factor, design of the system should be based on a peak “design” flow
of 0.16 cfs/2.0 = 0.08 cfs. Once water flow to the well has ceased, we estimate the time to empty the
chamber will be approximately 0.55 hours.
The maximum volume that can be infiltrated by the dry well is defined by the following equation:
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 9
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
𝑉் ൌ ሺ𝑇 െ𝑇ௐሻ ∙𝑄ௐ 𝑉ௐ
Where:
VT= Total volume infiltrated
TD= Allowable drawdown time of system
TW= Time to empty well chamber
QW= Design flow rate of well
VW= Storage volume of dry well
Assuming an allowable total drawdown time of 96 hours, the maximum total design capture volume
(DCV) one dry well can dispose would be approximately (96-0.55) hrs x 0.08 cfs x 3600 s/hr = 27,490
cubic feet. The effective storage capacity of the dry will is 285 cubic feet.
The well should be located at least 10 feet horizontally from any habitable structure.
The actual flow capacity of the dry well could be less or more than the estimated value. As such,
provisions should be made to accommodate excess flow quantities in the event the dry well does not
infiltrate the anticipated amount. The design also assumes that sediments will be removed from the
inflowing water through an upper chamber or other device. Sediments that are allowed to enter the
dry well will tend to degrade the flow capacity by plugging up the infiltration surfaces.
In general, the dry well shaft is anticipated to be adequately stable under temporary construction
conditions for uncased drilling. However, friable materials are present and will likely slough during
drilling. The contractor should be prepared to install the gravel and chamber immediately following
the drilling of the shaft. Workers should not enter the shaft unless the excavation is laid back or shored
in accordance with OSHA requirements. The placement and compaction of backfill materials,
including the gravel and slurry, should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant.
Chamber
A buried chamber system may be used in lieu of a dry well. Infiltration of storm water using a buried
chamber is not anticipated to result in adverse geotechnical conditions at the site or surrounding sites
including subsidence, landsliding, or liquefaction.
Using a system that is founded at a depth of at least 5 feet below current grade, we recommend a
“measured” infiltration rate of 2.0 in./hr. Applying the required reduction factor of 2 as previously
discussed, we obtained a Design Infiltration Rate of 1.0 in./hr.
The chambers should be located at least 10 feet horizontally from any habitable structure or property
boundaries but otherwise can generally be located anywhere else on the property.
The excavations for the chamber system should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant to
confirm they expose native alluvial soils at the bottom and are consistent with the conditions
anticipated herein.
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 10
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LIMITATIONS
This report is based on the geotechnical data as described herein. The materials encountered in our
boring excavations and utilized in our laboratory testing for this investigation are believed
representative of the project area, and the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report
are presented on that basis. However, soil and bedrock materials can vary in characteristics between
points of exploration, both laterally and vertically, and those variations could affect the conclusions
and recommendations contained herein. As such, observations by a geotechnical consultant during the
construction phase of the storm water infiltration systems are essential to confirming the basis of this
report.
This report has been prepared consistent with that level of care being provided by other professionals
providing similar services at the same locale and time period. The contents of this report are
professional opinions and as such, are not to be considered a guaranty or warranty.
This report should be reviewed and updated after a period of one year or if the site ownership or project
concept changes from that described herein.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Borstein Enterprises to assist the project
consultants in the design of the proposed development. This report has not been prepared for use by
parties or projects other than those named or described herein. This report may not contain sufficient
information for other parties or other purposes.
This report is subject to review by the controlling governmental agency.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you should have any questions regarding
the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
David E. Albus
Principal Engineer
GE 2455
Enclosures: Plate 1- Geotechnical Map
Plate 2- Dry Well Diagram
Appendix A - Exploratory Logs
Appendix B – Laboratory Testing
Appendix C - Percolation Testing and Analyses
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
Page 11
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
REFERENCES
Publications and Reports
California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Report 024,
"Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the El Monte 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County,
California", 1998.
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Well Data (accessed 2020):
https://dpw.lacounty.gov/general/wells/
Procedure for Performing Field Permeability Testing by the Well Permeameter Method, by United
States Department of The Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR 7300-89).
Guidelines for Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting Low Impact Development Stormwater
Infiltration, by County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Geotechnical and Materials
Engineering Division (GS200.2).
APPROXIMATEPROJECT SITE LIMITSB-1P-2P-1B-2B-3B-4B-5B-6EXPLANATION(Locations Approximate)0 50 100 200APPROX SCALE : 1" = 100'- Exploratory Boring- Percolation Test Boring1Plate:Date: 10/27/20213016.00Job No.:GEOTECHNICAL MAP©Google 2021
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX A
EXPLORATORY LOGS
Field Identification Sheet
Light gray Description Order:
Description, Color, Moisture, Density, Grain Size, Additional Description
Gray Description %
0-5
trace 5-15
Dark gray with 15-30
30+Gravelly Sand with Silt trace Clay
Moisture Silty Clay with Sand trace Gravel
Gray Brown Dry
Damp
Moist
Light brown Very Moist
Wet
Brown Density (Navfac)
SPT CA
0-3 0-5
Dark Brown 3-8 5-13
8-14 13-22
14-25 22-40
Olive brown 25> 40>
2< 0-3
Olive 2-4 3-6
4-8 6-13
8-15 13-24
Yellow 15-30 24-48
30> 48>
Yellowish brown Grain Size
Description Sieve Size Approx. Size
>12" Larger than basketball
Yellowish red 3-12" Fist to basketball
coarse 3/4-3" Thumb to Fist
fine #4-3/4" Pea to Thumb
Red coarse #10-4 Rock Salt to Pea
medium #40-10 Sugar to Rock Salt
fine #200-40 Flour to Sugar
Reddish Brown Pass #200 Smaller than Flour
Additional Description (ie. roots, pinhole pores, debris, etc.)
Tan Trace 5% Moderate 15% Abundant 30%
Albus & Associates, Inc. Plate A-0
absence of water
near optimum
below optimum
Very Loose
Sand
Sand trace Silt
Sand with Silt
Silty Sand
Example
Very Soft
Soft
Stiff
above optimum
free water visible
Loose
Medium Dense
More Examples
Fines
Sand
Gravel
Sand with Silt and Clay
Sand trace Silt and Clay
Sand with Silt trace Clay
Very Stiff
Hard
Fine grained soils
Medium Stiff
Boulders
Cobbles
Dense
Coarse grained soils
Very Dense
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
WaterCoreBulk5
10
15
20
EXPLANATION
Solid lines separate geologic units and/or material types.
Dashed lines indicate unknown depth of geologic unit change or
material type change.
Solid black rectangle in Core column represents California
Split Spoon sampler (2.5in ID, 3in OD).
Double triangle in core column represents SPT sampler.
Vertical Lines in core column represents Shelby sampler.
Solid black rectangle in Bulk column respresents large bag
sample.
Other Laboratory Tests:
Max = Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content
EI = Expansion Index
SO4 = Soluble Sulfate Content
DSR = Direct Shear, Remolded
DS = Direct Shear, Undisturbed
SA = Sieve Analysis (1" through #200 sieve)
Hydro = Particle Size Analysis (SA with Hydrometer)
200 = Percent Passing #200 Sieve
Consol = Consolidation
SE = Sand Equivalent
Rval = R-Value
ATT = Atterberg Limits
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-1
358
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
15
20
25
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM):Light brown, dry, fine to medium grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Sand with Gravel trace Silt (SP):Brown to yellowish brown,
damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand
Sand with Gravel (SP):Yellowish brown, damp to moist,
medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand
Gravelly Sand (SW):Yellowish brown, damp to moist, medium
dense, fine to coarse grained sand
@ 10 ft, more coarse grained sand
@ 15 ft, dry to damp, very dense
Silty Sand (SM):Brown to yellowish brown, moist, very dense,
fine grained sand
@ 20 ft, medium dense
Sand with Gravel trace Silt (SP):Brown, moist, dense, more fine
grained sand
34
37
17
10
21
20
28
3.6
2.9
3.2
2.6
117.4
112.4
103.9
112.8
Max EI
SO4 DS
pH Resist
Ch
SA Hydro
200
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-2
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-1
358
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
35
40
45
50
Yellowish brown, very dense, more fine to coarse grained sand
Gravelly Sand (SP):Light reddish brown, dry to damp, very
dense, fine to coarse grained sand
Sand with Silt (SP):Light reddish brown, damp to moist, very
dense, fine grained sand
Silty Sand (SM):Light reddish brown, damp to moist, very
dense, fine grained sand, moderate fines
Clayey Sand (SC):Brown to reddish brown, moist, hard, fine
grained sand
Total Depth 51.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
52
49
36
61
30
SA Hydro
200
200
ATT
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-3
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-2
357.9
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine
to coarse grained sand
Gravelly Sand (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, medium dense,
fine to coarse grained sand
@ 6 ft, dense, gravel up to 1 inch dia
@ 10 ft, medium dense, cobbles observed in cuttings up to 6
inch dia
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
15
28
25
30
2.7
3.3 112.4
200
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-4
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-3
357.9
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Gravelly Sand trace Silt (SP): Yellowish brown, dry to damp,
medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand
@ 4 ft, damp, loose, no silt, gravel up to 1 inch dia
@ 6 ft, moist, medium dense
@ 10 ft, 4 inch dia cobble observed in cuttings
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
19
12
27
2.3
3.1
3.4
104.9
109.8 Consol
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-5
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-4
358
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, moist, loose, fine to coarse
grained sand
Sand with Gravel (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, loose, fine to
coarse grained sand
@ 6 ft, medium dense
@ 10 ft, more coarse grained sand
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
31
15
13
17
3.7
3.8
2.8
4.5
112.9
107.2
105.9 Consol
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-6
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-5
361
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine
to medium grained sand
@ 4 ft, Yellowish brown
Sand with Gravel (SP): Yellowish brown, moist, medium
dense, fine to coarse grained sand
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
17
20
34
3.4
4.6
3.1
108.7
-31.3
111.1
200
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-7
Project:
Address:
Job Number:
Drill Method:
Client:
Driving Weight:
Location:
Elevation:
Date:
Logged By:
Depth
(feet)
Lith-
ology
Blows
Per
Foot
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Other
Lab Tests
Laboratory TestsSamples
Material Description
E X P L O R A T I O N L O G
8601 Mission Dr, Rosemead, CA
3016.00 9/7/2021
ddalbusHollow-Stem Auger
Borstein Enterprises
B-6
361.2
WaterCoreBulk140 lbs / 30 in
5
10
ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af)
Silty Sand (SM): Brown, dry, fine grained sand
ALLUVIUM (Qal)
Silty Sand with Gravel (SM): Brown, damp, medium dense, fine
to coarse grained sand
Gravelly Sand (SP): Yellowish brown, damp, loose, fine to
coarse grained sand
@ 6 ft, medium dense, more coarse grained sand
@ 10 ft, dense, more gravel 46
16
15
24
3.4
2.1
2.4
2.4
103.2
108.5
109.8
200
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate A-8
Total Depth 11.5 feet
No Groundwater
Boring backfilled with soil cuttings
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TEST PROGRAM
Borstein Enterprises October 27, 2021
J.N.: 3016.00
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
Soil Classification
Soils encountered within the exploratory borings were initially classified in the field in general
accordance with the visual-manual procedures of the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D
2488). The samples were re-examined in the laboratory and classifications reviewed and then revised
where appropriate. The assigned group symbols are presented on the Exploration Logs provided in
Appendix A.
In-Situ Moisture Content and Dry Density
Moisture content and dry density of in-place soil materials were determined in representative strata.
Test data are summarized on the Exploration Logs, Appendix A.
Atterberg Limits
Atterberg Limits (Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index) were performed in accordance
with Test Method ASTM D 4318. Pertinent test values are presented within Table B-1.
Particle Size Analyses
Particle size analyses were performed on representative samples of site materials in accordance with
ASTM D 422. The results are presented graphically on the attached Plates B-1 and B-2.
TABLE B-1
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Boring
No.
Sample
Depth
(ft)
Soil Description Test Results
B-1 20 Silty Sand Passing No. 200 Sieve: 43.4
B-1 35 Gravelly Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 11.1
B-1 45 Sand with Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 17.7
B-1 50 Sandy Clay with Silt
Liquid Limit (%):
Plasticity Index (%):
25
7.2
B-2 10 Gravelly Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 10.7
B-5 10 Gravelly Sand with Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 20.3
B-6 4 Sand trace Silt Passing No. 200 Sieve: 6.2
Note: Additional laboratory test results are provided on the boring logs provided in Appendix A.
COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
Description
Sand with Gravel trace Silt
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-1
3016.00
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Job Number Location
B-1
GRAVELCOBBLES SILT AND CLAYSAND
15
Depth
6"3"1.5"3/4"3/8"4 10 20 40 60 100 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.00010.0010.010.1110100
U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes
Percent RetainedPercent PassingGrain Size in Millimeters
COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
Description
Sand with Gravel trace Silt
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-2
3016.00
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Job Number Location
B-1
GRAVELCOBBLES SILT AND CLAYSAND
30
Depth
6"3"1.5"3/4"3/8"4 10 20 40 60 100 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.00010.0010.010.1110100
U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes
Percent RetainedPercent PassingGrain Size in Millimeters
CONSOLIDATION
Job Number Location Depth
3016.00 B-3 6
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-3
Description
Sand
102.5 4 18.2
Initial Dry Density (pcf)Initial Moisture Content (%)Final Moisture Concent (%)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
100 1000 10000 100000CONSOLIDATION (%)NORMAL STRESS (psf)
Field Saturated
CONSOLIDATION
Job Number Location Depth
3016.00 B-4 6
Albus & Associates, Inc.Plate B-4
Description
Sand
106.5 4.9 18.7
Initial Dry Density (pcf)Initial Moisture Content (%)Final Moisture Concent (%)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
100 1000 10000 100000CONSOLIDATION (%)NORMAL STRESS (psf)
Field Saturated
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX C
PERCOLATION TESTING AND ANALYSES
Client: Job. No.: 3016.00
Date Tested: Test by: ddalbus
Location:
Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 15
Elev. of Ground Surface (ft):
Diam. of Test Hole (in): 8
Diam. of Casing (in): 3
Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0.3
Water Tempurature (C°): 21
Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used
(minutes) (ft) (gal./min.) (gal)
0 9:35 12.5 6.60 0.00
1 9:36 12.5 6.40 6.50
2 9:37 12.5 6.10 13.00
2 9:37 12.5 5.92 16.12
3 9:38 12.5 5.80 19.13
4 9:39 12.5 5.56 24.99
5 9:40 12.50 5.46 30.67
6 9:41 12.50 5.36 36.18
7 9:42 12.50 5.20 41.59
9 9:44 12.50 5.00 52.15
11 9:46 12.50 4.86 62.35
23 9:58 12.30 4.70 121.51
35 10:10 12.3 4.70 178.87
45 10:20 12.30 4.70 225.87
55 10:30 21.30 4.70 272.87
Constant Head
Time
Field Percolation Testing - Constant Head
9/7/2021
P-1
Borstein Enterprises
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Accumulated Flow - Gallons
Time - Minutes
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-1
Client: Job. No.: 3016.00
Date Tested: Test by: ddalbus
Location:
Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 30
Elev. of Ground Surface (ft):
Diam. of Test Hole (in): 8
Diam. of Casing (in): 3
Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0
Water Tempurature (C°): 21
Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used
(minutes) (ft) (gal./min.) (gal)
0 12:15 26.95 1.00 0.00
2 12:17 26.95 0.98 1.98
3 12:18 26.85 0.86 2.97
5 12:20 26.8 0.78 4.81
7 12:22 26.8 0.68 6.45
13 12:28 26.8 0.68 10.83
29 12:44 26.80 0.68 21.71
45 13:00 26.80 0.68 32.59
Time
Field Percolation Testing - Constant Head
Borstein Enterprises
9/7/2021
P-2
Constant Head
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
0 10 20 30 40 50Accumulated Flow - Gallons
Time - Minutes
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-2
J.N.:3016.00
Client: Borstein Enterprises
Well No.: P-1
Condition 1
Condition 2
Condition 3
Units:
1
14.7 feet
12 feet
2.7 feet
4.0 Inches
Minimum Volume Required:361.1 Gal.
4.7 Gal/min.
21 Celsius
0.9647 ft^3/min.
Ignore Tᵤ
1
2.55E-02 ft/min.
18.34 in./hr.
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-3
Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady-State Condition (q):
INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN
Constant Head
USBR 7300-89 Method
Low Water Table
High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well
High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom
Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3):
Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁):
Depth to Water (h₂):
Height of Water in the Well (h₁-h₂=h):
Radius of Well (r):
The presence or absence of a water table or
impervious soil layer within a distance of less than
three times that of the water depth in the well
(measured from the water surface) will enable the
water table to be classified as Condition I,
Condition II, Condtion III.
Low Water Table-When the distance from the
water surface in the test well to the ground water
table, or to an impervious soil layer which is
considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a
water table, is greater than three times the depth
of water in the well, classify as Condition I.
High Water Table-When the distance from the
water surface in the test well to the ground water
table or to an impervious layer is less than three
times the depth of water in the well, a high water
table condition exists. Use Condition II when the
water table or impervious layer is below the well
bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or
impervious layer is above the well bottom.
Temperature (T):
(Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V):
Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and
the Water table (Tᵤ):
Factor of Safety:
Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀):
Design k₂₀:
J.N.:3016.00
Client: Borstein Enterprises
Well No.: P-2
Condition 1
Condition 2
Condition 3
Units:
1
30 feet
27 feet
3 feet
4.0 Inches
Minimum Volume Required:454.8 Gal.
0.68 Gal/min.
21 Celsius
0.9647 ft^3/min.
Ignore Tᵤ
1
3.13E-03 ft/min.
2.26 in./hr.
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-4
Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady-State Condition (q):
INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN
Constant Head
USBR 7300-89 Method
Low Water Table
High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well
High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom
Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3):
Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁):
Depth to Water (h₂):
Height of Water in the Well (h₁-h₂=h):
Radius of Well (r):
The presence or absence of a water table or
impervious soil layer within a distance of less than
three times that of the water depth in the well
(measured from the water surface) will enable the
water table to be classified as Condition I,
Condition II, Condtion III.
Low Water Table-When the distance from the
water surface in the test well to the ground water
table, or to an impervious soil layer which is
considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a
water table, is greater than three times the depth
of water in the well, classify as Condition I.
High Water Table-When the distance from the
water surface in the test well to the ground water
table or to an impervious layer is less than three
times the depth of water in the well, a high water
table condition exists. Use Condition II when the
water table or impervious layer is below the well
bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or
impervious layer is above the well bottom.
Temperature (T):
(Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V):
Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and
the Water table (Tᵤ):
Factor of Safety:
Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀):
Design k₂₀:
Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr
Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr
Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr
Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr
0
5 10 15
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-5
Contours are Pressure Head in Feet.
STEADY STATE
Arrows indicate direction of flow
and relative magnitude of velocity.
93 Ft
Radius (ft)
0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr
Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr
Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr
Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr
0
5
10
15
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-6
Contours are Pressure Head in Feet.
TRANSIENT @ 0.5 hrs
Arrows indicate direction of flow
and relative magnitude of velocity.
Radius (ft)
0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr
Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr
Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr
Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr
0
5
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-7
Contours are Pressure Head in Feet.
TRANSIENT @ 1 hr
Arrows indicate direction of flow
and relative magnitude of velocity.
Radius (ft)
0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr
Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr
Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr
Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr
0
ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-8
Contours are Pressure Head in Feet.
TRANSIENT @ 1.5 hrs
Arrows indicate direction of flow
and relative magnitude of velocity.
Radius (ft)
0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Soil No. 3 - SP/SM Ks = 2 in/hr
Soil No. 2 - SW Ks = 15 in/hr
Soil No. 4 - SC Ks = 0.01 in/hr
Soil No. 1 - FILL (SM) Ks = 0.1 in/hr
0 ALBUS & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-9
Contours are Pressure Head in Feet.
TRANSIENT @ 2.5 hrs
Arrows indicate direction of flow
and relative magnitude of velocity.
Radius (ft)
0 102030405060Elevation (ft)30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
August 2022
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
MISSION VILLAS PROJECT
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
August 2022
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
MISSION VILLAS PROJECT
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
Submitted to:
EPD Solutions, Inc.
2355 Main Street, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92614
Prepared by:
LSA
20 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92614
(949) 553-0666
Project No. ESL2201.32
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................................. ii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................ iii
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4
Project Location And Description .................................................................................................. 4
Existing Land Uses In The Project Area ......................................................................................... 4
NOISE AND VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS .................................................................... 7
Characteristics of Sound ................................................................................................................ 7
Measurement of Sound................................................................................................................. 7
Physiological Effects of Noise ............................................................................................................. 8
Fundamentals of Vibration .......................................................................................................... 10
REGULATORY SETTING .............................................................................................. 12
Applicable Noise Standards ......................................................................................................... 12
California Code of Regulations ......................................................................................................... 12
City of Rosemead .............................................................................................................................. 12
Federal Transit Administration ......................................................................................................... 15
Applicable Vibration Standards ................................................................................................... 15
Federal Transit Administration ......................................................................................................... 16
OVERVIEW OF THE EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT .................................................. 17
Ambient Noise Measurements ................................................................................................... 17
Long-Term Noise Measurements ..................................................................................................... 17
Existing Aircraft Noise ................................................................................................................. 18
PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 20
Short-Term Construction Noise Impacts ..................................................................................... 20
Short-Term Construction Vibration Impacts ............................................................................... 23
Long-Term Off-Site Traffic Noise Impacts ................................................................................... 26
Long-Term Traffic-Related Vibration Impacts ............................................................................. 26
Best Construction Practices ......................................................................................................... 27
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ........................................................................................ 28
Exterior Noise Assessment .......................................................................................................... 28
Interior Noise Assessment........................................................................................................... 28
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 29
APPENDICES
A: NOISE MONITORING DATA
B: CONSTRUCTION NOISE CALCULATIONS
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» ii
FIGURES AND TABLES
FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Location ....................................................................................................................... 5
Figure 2: Site Plan ................................................................................................................................... 6
Figure 3: Noise Monitoring Locations .................................................................................................. 19
TABLES
Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms ................................................................................................ 9
Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources.................................................................... 10
Table C: Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix..................................................................................... 13
Table D: Maximum Sound Levels for Source Land Uses ....................................................................... 15
Table E: General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria ................................................................... 15
Table F: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis ...................................................... 16
Table G: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria ................................................................................ 16
Table H: Existing Noise Level Measurements ....................................................................................... 17
Table I: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels ......................................................................... 21
Table J: Potential Construction Noise Impacts at Nearest Receptor ................................................... 22
Table K: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment .................................................... 23
Table L: Potential Construction Vibration Annoyance Impacts at Nearest Receptor .......................... 24
Table M: Potential Construction Vibration Damage Impacts at Nearest Receptor ............................. 24
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ADT average daily trips
ALUC Airport Land Use Compatibility
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
City City of Rosemead
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
dBA A-weighted decibel(s)
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
ft foot/feet
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FTA Manual FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual
in/sec inch/inches per second
Ldn day-night average noise level
Leq equivalent continuous sound level
Lmax maximum instantaneous sound level
mi mile/miles
Noise Element City of Rosemead General Plan Noise Element
PPV peak particle velocity
project Mission Villas Project
EMT San Gabriel Valley Airport
RMS root-mean-square
STC Sound Transmission Class
VdB vibration velocity decibels
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 4
INTRODUCTION
This noise and vibration impact analysis has been prepared to evaluate the potential noise and
vibration impacts and reduction measures associated with the proposed Mission Villas Project
(project) in Rosemead, California. This report is intended to satisfy the City of Rosemead’s (City)
requirement for a project-specific noise impact analysis by examining the impacts of the project site
and evaluating noise reduction measures that the project may require.
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is located northeast of the intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Mission
Drive in Rosemead, California.
The project proposes to construct 37 residential units, including 29 single-family detached units and
8 duplex units as well as 17,298 square feet of open space area and 74 parking spaces on a 3.43-acre
site. The site is currently vacant. The project site is surrounded by existing single-family homes
immediately adjacent to the north and east, an existing church and single-family homes to the south
opposite Mission Drive, as well as vacant land and agricultural uses to the west. Existing single-
family homes are located to the west opposite the existing agricultural use and opposite Walnut
Grove Avenue. The project’s main entry will be from Mission Drive. Figures 1 and 2 show the project
location and site plan, respectively.
EXISTING LAND USES IN THE PROJECT AREA
The project site is surrounded primarily by residential uses and vacant parcels. The areas adjacent to
the project site include the following uses:
• North: Existing single-family residences;
• East: Existing single-family residences;
• South: Existing single-family residences and Sunrise House of Prayer opposite Mission Drive; and
• West: Existing single-family residences beyond agricultural and vacant land.
Project Location
SOURCE: ArcGIS Online Topographic Map (2020)
I:\ESL2201.32\G\Project_LocaƟon.ai (8/3/2022)
FIGURE 1
Mission Villtas Project
Project LocaƟon
0 400 800
FEET
LEGEND
Project Site
Los Angeles
County
Orange
County
£¤101
ÃÃ2
ÃÃ170
ÃÃ142
ÃÃ72
ÃÃ90ÃÃ19
ÃÃ134
ÃÃ57
ÃÃ39
ÃÃ91
ÃÃ60
§¨¦405
§¨¦110
§¨¦10
§¨¦105
§¨¦10
§¨¦710
§¨¦210
§¨¦605
§¨¦5
Project Vicinity
Project Location
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 MAIL9
10
11
12 13
20
21
22
23
24
25
14
15
16
17
18
19
38.29'
42.62'
26.17'
26.17'
32.67'32.67'
26.17'
26.17'
33.48'
26.17'
26.17'
32.67'
32.67'
26.17'
26.17'
38.35'76.50'86.00'76.62'86.14'S89°55'40"W 174.11'S00°56'10"E 542.70'N00°19'33"W 254.20'N28°55'42"E 389.37'S64°18'
3
2
"
E
2
5
0
.
3
7
'S20°14'36"W 169.63'N89°08'21"E 86.93'20.014.08.00 15.0015.3017.2313.23
13.76
20.00
24.00
13.00
20.0014.018.00
20.0020.73
18.0010.0011.5030.009.018.09.018.0
8.00
20.00 5
TYP
5
TYP
19.15 6.020.0038.00
13.00
13.00
20.00
24.00
20.00TYP
12.17
10.17
14.69
11.00 20.003TYP3TYP21.010.0
8.0
13.05
12.03
M
M
SBE PAR 1 MAP 148-19-52D SBEPAR 2 MAP 148-19-52D 2PTSSO CALIF EDISON CONO SITUSAPN: 5389-005-800
QUYEN Y TO4629 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-042JOANNE TRINH8600 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-047MANDY TA8606 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-048DAVID K IKARI/DENNIS S IKARI8612 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-049JI HWAN LEE/EUN JOO LEE8620 ZERELDA STAPN: 5389-009-043MIKE B TO/TRITIA TO4623 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-041
WILLIAM J STONECYPHER JR4617 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-040
CARLOS VILLAGRAN/KAREN VILLAGRAN4613 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-039
FENGYI J SITU/TRACY F SITU4607 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-038
NGO & BANH FAMILY TRUSTNGO ALEXANDER D TR4603 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-037
JASON SAM/FRAUSTINA SAM4549 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-036
LAIRD ANDERSON/DONNA B ANDERSON4545 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-035
BRYANT M TANG4539 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-034
LENK TRUSTLENK JANET M TR4535 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-033
KOKICHI NAKAZAWA/SUMIE NAKAZAWA4529 BARTLETT AVEAPN: 5389-009-032
SA
N
D
Y
H
W
U
86
3
9
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
D
R
APN
:
5
3
8
9
-
0
0
9
-
0
2
6
DE H
O
N
G
8637
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
D
R
APN:
5
3
8
9
-
0
0
9
-
0
2
8
DUBOIS FA
M
I
L
Y
T
R
U
S
T
DUBOIS WA
Y
N
E
A
&
DOROTHY A
T
R
S8635 MISSI
O
N
D
RAPN: 5389-
0
0
9
-
0
2
74040803232886.016.0DU5
DU
9
DU
7
DU
10
DU11
DU
12
DU13
DU
14
DU15
DU
16
DU
17
DU
20
DU21
DU
22
DU23
DU32
DU
33
DU
31
DU
34
DU
35
DU
24
DU
25
DU
26
DU27
DU
28
DU
29
DU
30
DU
18
DU
19
DU1
DU
2
DU
3
DU
6
DU
4
DU
8
DU36
DU
37
L01
L02
L03TYP
L05
L06
L07TYP
L08
TYP
L04TYP
C01
C02
C02
C02
L05
P01TYP
W01
TYP
SOURCE: Architeyk
FIGURE 2
Site Plan
Mission Villas Project
I:\ESL2201.32\G\Site_Plan.ai (8/3/2022)
025 50
FEET
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 7
NOISE AND VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS
CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUND
Noise is usually defined as unwanted sound. Noise consists of any sound that may produce
physiological or psychological damage and/or interfere with communication, work, rest, recreation,
and sleep.
To the human ear, sound has two significant characteristics: pitch and loudness. Pitch is generally an
annoyance, while loudness can affect the ability to hear. Pitch is the number of complete vibrations,
or cycles per second, of a sound wave, which results in the tone’s range from high to low. Loudness
is the strength of a sound, and it describes a noisy or quiet environment; it is measured by the
amplitude of the sound wave. Loudness is determined by the intensity of the sound waves
combined with the reception characteristics of the human ear. Sound intensity is the average rate of
sound energy transmitted through a unit area perpendicular to the direction in which the sound
waves are traveling. This characteristic of sound can be precisely measured with instruments. The
analysis of a project defines the noise environment of the project area in terms of sound intensity
and its effect on adjacent sensitive land uses.
MEASUREMENT OF SOUND
Sound intensity is measured with the A-weighted decibel (dBA) scale to correct for the relative
frequency response of the human ear. That is, an A-weighted noise level de-emphasizes low and
very high frequencies of sound, similar to the human ear’s de-emphasis of these frequencies.
Decibels (dB), unlike the linear scale (e.g., inches or pounds), are measured on a logarithmic scale
representing points on a sharply rising curve.
For example, 10 dB is 10 times more intense than 0 dB, 20 dB is 100 times more intense than 0 dB,
and 30 dB is 1,000 times more intense than 0 dB. Thirty decibels (30 dB) represents 1,000 times as
much acoustic energy as 0 dB. The decibel scale increases as the square of the change, representing
the sound pressure energy. A sound as soft as human breathing is about 10 times greater than 0 dB.
The decibel system of measuring sound gives a rough connection between the physical intensity of
sound and its perceived loudness to the human ear. A 10 dB increase in sound level is perceived by
the human ear as only a doubling of the sound’s loudness. Ambient sounds generally range from
30 dB (very quiet) to 100 dB (very loud).
Sound levels are generated from a source, and their decibel level decreases as the distance from
that source increases. Sound levels dissipate exponentially with distance from their noise sources.
For a single point source, sound levels decrease approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance
from the source. This drop-off rate is appropriate for noise generated by stationary equipment.
If noise is produced by a line source (e.g., highway traffic or railroad operations), the sound
decreases 3 dB for each doubling of distance in a hard site environment. Line-source sound levels
decrease 4.5 dB for each doubling of distance in a relatively flat environment with absorptive
vegetation.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 8
There are many ways to rate noise for various time periods, but an appropriate rating of ambient
noise affecting humans also accounts for the annoying effects of sound. The equivalent continuous
sound level (Leq) is the total sound energy of time-varying noise over a sample period. However, the
predominant rating scales for human communities in the State of California are the Leq and
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) or the day-night average noise level (Ldn) based on
A-weighted decibels. CNEL is the time-weighted average noise over a 24-hour period, with a
5 dBA weighting factor applied to the hourly Leq for noises occurring from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
(defined as relaxation hours) and a 10 dBA weighting factor applied to noises occurring from
10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (defined as sleeping hours). Ldn is similar to the CNEL scale but without the
adjustment for events occurring during relaxation hours. CNEL and Ldn are within 1 dBA of each
other and are normally interchangeable. The City uses the CNEL noise scale for long-term traffic
noise impact assessment.
Other noise rating scales of importance when assessing the annoyance factor include the maximum
instantaneous noise level (Lmax), which is the highest sound level that occurs during a stated time
period. The noise environments discussed in this analysis for short-term noise impacts are specified
in terms of maximum levels denoted by Lmax, which reflects peak operating conditions and addresses
the annoying aspects of intermittent noise. It is often used together with another noise scale, or
noise standards in terms of percentile noise levels, in noise ordinances for enforcement purposes.
For example, the L10 noise level represents the noise level exceeded 10 percent of the time during a
stated period. The L50 noise level represents the median noise level. Half the time the noise level
exceeds this level, and half the time it is less than this level. The L90 noise level represents the noise
level exceeded 90 percent of the time and is considered the background noise level during a
monitoring period. For a relatively constant noise source, the Leq and L50 are approximately the
same.
Noise impacts can be described in three categories. The first category includes audible impacts,
which are increases in noise levels noticeable to humans. Audible increases in noise levels generally
refer to a change of 3 dB or greater because this level has been found to be barely perceptible in
exterior environments. The second category, potentially audible, refers to a change in the noise
level between 1 dB and 3 dB. This range of noise levels has been found to be noticeable only in
laboratory environments. The last category includes changes in noise levels of less than 1 dB, which
are inaudible to the human ear. Only audible changes in existing ambient or background noise levels
are considered potentially significant.
Physiological Effects of Noise
Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to sound levels higher than
85 dBA. Exposure to high sound levels affects the entire system, with prolonged sound exposure in
excess of 75 dBA increasing body tensions, thereby affecting blood pressure and functions of the
heart and the nervous system. In comparison, extended periods of sound exposure above
90 dBA would result in permanent cell damage. When the sound level reaches 120 dBA, a tickling
sensation occurs in the human ear, even with short-term exposure. This level of sound is called the
threshold of feeling. As the sound reaches 140 dBA, the tickling sensation is replaced by a feeling of
pain in the ear (i.e., the threshold of pain). A sound level of 160–165 dBA will result in dizziness or a
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 9
loss of equilibrium. The ambient or background noise problem is widespread and generally more
concentrated in urban areas than in outlying, less developed areas.
Table A lists definitions of acoustical terms, and Table B shows common sound levels and their
sources.
Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms
Term Definitions
Decibel, dB A unit of sound measurement that denotes the ratio between two quantities that are
proportional to power; the number of decibels is 10 times the logarithm (to the base 10) of this
ratio.
Frequency, Hz Of a function periodic in time, the number of times that the quantity repeats itself in 1 second
(i.e., the number of cycles per second).
A-Weighted Sound
Level, dBA
The sound level obtained by use of A-weighting. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very
low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency
response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise. (All sound
levels in this report are A-weighted unless reported otherwise.)
L01, L10, L50, L90 The fast A-weighted noise levels that are equaled or exceeded by a fluctuating sound level 1%,
10%, 50%, and 90% of a stated time period, respectively.
Equivalent
Continuous Noise
Level, Leq
The level of a steady sound that, in a stated time period and at a stated location, has the same
A-weighted sound energy as the time-varying sound.
Community Noise
Equivalent Level,
CNEL
The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight, obtained after the
addition of 5 dBA to sound levels occurring in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and
after the addition of 10 dBA to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and
7:00 a.m.
Day/Night Noise
Level, Ldn
The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight, obtained after the
addition of 10 dBA to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
Lmax, Lmin The maximum and minimum A-weighted sound levels measured on a sound level meter,
during a designated time interval, using fast time averaging.
Ambient Noise Level The all-encompassing noise associated with a given environment at a specified time. Usually a composite of sound from many sources from many directions, near and far; no particular
sound is dominant.
Intrusive The noise that intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The
relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, time of
occurrence, and tonal or informational content, as well as the prevailing ambient noise level.
Source: Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control (Harris 1991).
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 10
Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources
Noise Source A-Weighted Sound Level in Decibels Noise Environments Subjective Evaluations
Near Jet Engine 140 Deafening 128 times as loud
Civil Defense Siren 130 Threshold of Pain 64 times as loud
Hard Rock Band 120 Threshold of Feeling 32 times as loud
Accelerating Motorcycle at a Few Feet Away 110 Very Loud 16 times as loud
Pile Driver; Noisy Urban Street/Heavy City
Traffic
100 Very Loud 8 times as loud
Ambulance Siren; Food Blender 95 Very Loud —
Garbage Disposal 90 Very Loud 4 times as loud
Freight Cars; Living Room Music 85 Loud —
Pneumatic Drill; Vacuum Cleaner 80 Loud 2 times as loud
Busy Restaurant 75 Moderately Loud —
Near Freeway Auto Traffic 70 Moderately Loud Reference level
Average Office 60 Quiet One-half as loud
Suburban Street 55 Quiet —
Light Traffic; Soft Radio Music in Apartment 50 Quiet One-quarter as loud
Large Transformer 45 Quiet —
Average Residence without Stereo Playing 40 Faint One-eighth as loud
Soft Whisper 30 Faint —
Rustling Leaves 20 Very Faint —
Human Breathing 10 Very Faint Threshold of Hearing
— 0 Very Faint —
Source: Compiled by LSA (2022).
FUNDAMENTALS OF VIBRATION
Vibration refers to ground-borne noise and perceptible motion. Ground-borne vibration is almost
exclusively a concern inside buildings and is rarely perceived as a problem outdoors, where the
motion may be discernible, but without the effects associated with the shaking of a building there is
less adverse reaction. Vibration energy propagates from a source through intervening soil and rock
layers to the foundations of nearby buildings. The vibration then propagates from the foundation
throughout the remainder of the structure. Building vibration may be perceived by occupants as the
motion of building surfaces, the rattling of items sitting on shelves or hanging on walls, or a low-
frequency rumbling noise. The rumbling noise is caused by the vibration of walls, floors, and ceilings
that radiate sound waves. Annoyance from vibration often occurs when the vibration exceeds the
threshold of perception by 10 dB or less. This is an order of magnitude below the damage threshold
for normal buildings.
Typical sources of ground-borne vibration are construction activities (e.g., blasting, pile-driving, and
operating heavy-duty earthmoving equipment), steel-wheeled trains, and occasional traffic on rough
roads. Problems with both ground-borne vibration and noise from these sources are usually
localized to areas within approximately 100 feet (ft) from the vibration source, although there are
examples of ground-borne vibration causing interference out to distances greater than 200 ft .
When roadways are smooth, vibration from traffic, even heavy trucks, is rarely perceptible. It is
assumed for most projects that the roadway surface will be smooth enough that ground-borne
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 11
vibration from street traffic will not exceed the impact criteria; however, construction of the project
could result in ground-borne vibration that may be perceptible and annoying.
Ground-borne noise is not likely to be a problem because noise arriving via the normal airborne path
will usually be greater than ground-borne noise.
Ground-borne vibration has the potential to disturb people and damage buildings. Although it is
very rare for train-induced ground-borne vibration to cause even cosmetic building damage, it is not
uncommon for construction processes such as blasting and pile-driving to cause vibration of
sufficient amplitudes to damage nearby buildings. Ground-borne vibration is usually measured in
terms of vibration velocity, either the root-mean-square (RMS) velocity or peak particle velocity
(PPV). The RMS is best for characterizing human response to building vibration, and PPV is used to
characterize the potential for damage. Decibel notation acts to compress the range of numbers
required to describe vibration. Vibration velocity level in decibels is defined as:
Lv = 20 log10 [V/Vref]
where “Lv” is the vibration velocity in decibels (VdB), “V” is the RMS velocity amplitude, and “Vref” is
the reference velocity amplitude, or 1 x 10-6 inches/second (in/sec) used in the United States.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 12
REGULATORY SETTING
APPLICABLE NOISE STANDARDS
The applicable noise standards governing the project site include the criteria in the California Code
of Regulations, the Noise Element of the City’s General Plan (Noise Element), and the City of
Rosemead Municipal Code.
California Code of Regulations
Interior noise levels for residential habitable rooms are regulated by Title 24 of the California Code
of Regulations California Noise Insulation Standards. Title 24, Chapter 12, Section 1206.4, of the
2019 California Building Code requires that interior noise levels attributable to exterior sources not
exceed 45 CNEL in any habitable room. A habitable room is a room used for living, sleeping, eating,
or cooking. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, utility spaces, and similar areas are not considered
habitable rooms for this regulation (Title 24 California Code of Regulations, Chapter 12, Section
1206.4).
City of Rosemead
Noise Element of the General Plan
The City of Rosemead General Plan addresses noise in its Noise Element (General Plan 2010). The
Noise Element contains goals and policies for noise control and abatement in the City. General noise
goals for Rosemead aim to attain a healthier and quieter environment for all citizens while
maintaining a reasonable level of economic progress and development.
The City, consistent with the California Office of Planning and Research, has established land use
compatibility guidelines for determining acceptable noise levels for specified land uses as shown in
Table C. These land use compatibility guidelines are intended to be an advisory resource when
considering changes in land use and policies, such as zoning modifications.
The Issues, Goals, and Policies as well as the Implementation Actions in the City’s General Plan Noise
Element are designed to provide noise-compatible land use relationships by establishing noise
standards utilized for design and siting purposes and minimize noise impacts from significant noise
generators. The following goals and policies are applicable to the proposed project:
Issues, Goal, and Policies
• Goal 1: Effective incorporation of noise considerations into land use planning decisions.
○ Policy 1.1: Ensure compliance with standards for interior and exterior noise established
within the Noise Element and Zoning Code.
○ Policy 1.4: Encourage acoustical design in new construction
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 13
Table C: Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 14
○ Policy 1.5: Require sound walls to be constructed in designated mixed-use districts where
noise-sensitive land uses are located on adjacent properties.
Goal 3: Effective implementation of measures to control non-transportation noise impacts.
○ Policy 3.1: Enforce provisions of the Community Noise Ordinance to mitigate noise conflicts.
○ Policy 3.2: Require that potential sources of noise be considered when approving new
development to reduce the possibility of adverse affects.
○ Policy 3.3: Evaluate noise generated by construction activities to ensure compliance with
the Community Noise Ordinance.
○ Policy 3.4: Establish and maintain coordination among the City departments involved in
noise abatement.
Implementation Actions
• Goal 1: Effective incorporation of noise considerations into land use planning decisions.
○ Action 1.2: Incorporate noise reduction features during site planning to mitigate anticipated
noise impacts on affected noise sensitive land uses. The noise contours, illustrated on the
Existing Noise Contours Map, identify areas within the City exposed to noise levels greater
than 60dB CNEL and shall be used to identify locations of potential conflict. Require
acoustical analyses, as appropriate, for proposed residential development within the 60 dB
CNEL or higher contour. New developments will be permitted only if appropriate mitigation
measures are included.
○ Action 1.3: Enforce provisions of the California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24) that
specify that indoor noise levels for multi-family residential living spaces shall not exceed 45
dB CNEL. The standard is defined as the combined effect of all noise sources, and is
implemented when existing or future exterior noise levels exceed 60 dB CNEL. Title 24
further requires that the standard be applied to all new hotels, motels, apartment houses,
and dwellings other than detached single-family dwellings. The City will additionally apply
the standard to single-family dwellings and condominium conversion projects.
City of Rosemead Municipal Code
Section 8.36.030 of the City’s Municipal Code limits construction and demolition activities to
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Construction
activities should not take place at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. No person shall operate
or allow the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, or alteration
or demolition work outside of these hours to prevent noise disturbances.
Section 8.36.060 of the City’s Municipal Code, Noise Standards, establishes limits on non-impulsive
noise where no person shall maintain, create, operate, or cause noise on private property to not
exceed the noise standards shown in Table D. The standards are applicable to all receptor properties
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 15
within a designated noise zone. This section also establishes an allowable interior noise level of 45
dBA at all residential receptors during anytime of the day.
Table D: Maximum Sound Levels for Source Land Uses
Noise Zone Type of Land Use (Receptor Property) Time Interval Allowable Exterior Noise Level (dBA)
I
Single-,double-or
multiple family
residential
Daytime1 60
Nighttime2 45
II Commercial Daytime1 65
Nighttime2 60
III Industrial or manufacturing Anytime 70
Source: Section 8.36.060(A) of the City of Rosemead Municipal Code (2021).
1 Daytime means 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
2 Nighttime means 10:01 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. dBA = A-weighted decibels
Leq = equivalent continuous sound level
Federal Transit Administration
Although the City does not have daytime construction noise level limits for activities that occur
within the specified hours in Section 11.80.030(D)(7) to determine potential California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) noise impacts, construction noise was assessed using criteria from
the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018) (FTA Manual). Table E shows
the FTA’s General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria based on the composite noise levels per
construction phase.
Table E: General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria
Land Use Daytime 1-hour Leq (dBA) Nighttime 1-hour Leq (dBA)
Residential 90 80
Commercial 100 100
Industrial 100 100
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018).
dBA = A-weighted decibels Leq = equivalent continuous sound level
APPLICABLE VIBRATION STANDARDS
Given the City of Rosemead has not established its own vibration impact criteria, the following
information provides standards to which potential vibration impacts will be compared. Vibration
standards included in the FTA Manual are used in this analysis for ground-borne vibration impacts
on human annoyance and potential damage.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 16
Federal Transit Administration
Table F provides the criteria for assessing the potential for interference or annoyance from vibration
levels in a building. The criteria for annoyance impacts resulting from ground-borne vibration and
noise are based on the average vibration levels during construction. Table G provides the criteria for
assessing the potential for damage from vibration levels generated during construction to
surrounding structures. The criteria for annoyance impacts resulting from ground-borne vibration
and noise are based on the maximum vibration levels during construction at the project property
Table F: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis
Land Use Max Lv (VdB)1 Description of Use
Workshop 90 Vibration that is distinctly felt. Appropriate for workshops and similar areas
not as sensitive to vibration.
Office 84 Vibration that can be felt. Appropriate for offices and similar areas not as
sensitive to vibration.
Residential Day 78 Vibration that is barely felt. Adequate for computer equipment and low-
power optical microscopes (up to 20×).
Residential Night and
Operating Rooms 72
Vibration is not felt, but ground-borne noise may be audible inside quiet
rooms. Suitable for medium-power microscopes (100×) and other equipment
of low sensitivity.
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018).
1 As measured in 1/3-octave bands of frequency over a frequency range of 8 to 80 Hertz.
FTA = Federal Transit Administration
LV = velocity in decibels
Max = maximum
VdB = vibration velocity decibels
Table G: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria
Building Category PPV (in/sec)
Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster) 0.50
Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.30
Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.20
Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018).
FTA = Federal Transit Administration in/sec = inch/inches per second PPV = peak particle velocity
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 17
OVERVIEW OF THE EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT
The primary existing noise sources in the project area are transportation facilities. Traffic on Mission
Drive and Walnut Grove Avenue are a steady source of ambient noise.
AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS
Long-Term Noise Measurements
Two long-term (24-hour) noise level measurements were conducted on June 21 through June 22,
2022, using two Larson Davis Spark 706RC Dosimeters, and one short term measurement using a
Larson Davis 831 Sound Level Meter. Table H provides a summary of the measured hourly noise
levels from the noise level measurements. Hourly noise levels at surrounding sensitive uses are as
low as 37.3 dBA Leq during nighttime hours and 43.0 dBA Leq during daytime hours. Noise monitoring
data results are provided in Appendix A. Figure 3 shows the noise monitoring locations.
Table H: Existing Noise Level Measurements
Location Location Description
Daytime Noise Levels1 (dBA Leq)
Evening Noise Levels2 (dBA Leq)
Nighttime Noise Levels3 (dBA Leq)
Average
Daily Noise
Levels
(dBA CNEL)
LT-1 Southern corner of project site, on a fence along the backyard of 8623 Mission Drive 50.9 – 62.5 49.2 – 56.1 42.6 – 52.1 57.0
LT-2
Western corner of project site,
bordering a power line near a fence
next to a power line tower.
47.6 – 59.8 45.4 – 54.3 41.9 – 50.7 55.2
ST-14 Northeast corner of project site,
south of 8612 Zerelda Street 43.0 – 55.2 40.8 – 49.7 37.3 – 46.1 50.6
Source: Compiled by LSA (August 2022).
1 Daytime Noise Levels = noise levels during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
2 Evening Noise Levels = noise levels during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
3 Nighttime Noise Levels = noise levels during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
4 Short-term measurement data estimated based on corresponding long-term dBA = A-weighted decibels ft = foot/feet CNELLdn = Day-night Level
Leq = equivalent continuous sound level
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 18
EXISTING AIRCRAFT NOISE
Airport-related noise levels are primarily associated with aircraft engine noise made while aircraft
are taking off, landing, or running their engines while still on the ground. The closest airport to the
proposed project site is San Gabriel Valley Airport (EMT), formerly known as El Monte Airport,
located approximately 2.6 miles (mi) east of the project site. Based on the Airport’s Master Plan
report (1995), the project is located well outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour of the airport.
Therefore, the project site is not expected to experience airport-related noise levels in excess of the
City of Rosemead exterior standards. No further analysis is necessary.
SOURCE: Google Earth 2021
I:\ESL2201.32\G\Noise_Locs.ai (8/3/22)
FIGURE 3
Mission Villas Project
Noise Monitoring LocaƟons
0 100 200
FEET
LEGEND
- Project Site Boundary
- Short-Term Noise Monitoring LocaƟon
- Long-Term Noise Monitoring LocaƟonLLT-1-1
ST-1-1
LT-1
ST-1
ST-1-1ST-1
LT-1-1LT-1
LT-2-2LT-2
Miss
o
n
D
r
Misson Dr BartleƩ AveBartleƩ AveWa
ln
u
t
G
r
o
ve
A
veWalnut Gr
ove AveMiss
o
n
D
r BartleƩ AveWa
ln
u
t
G
r
o
ve
A
ve
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 20
PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS
SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACTS
Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during the construction of the proposed project.
First, construction crew commutes and the transport of construction equipment and materials to
the site for the proposed project would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading
to the site. Although there would be a relatively high single-event noise-exposure potential causing
intermittent noise nuisance (passing trucks at 50 ft would generate up to 84 dBA Lmax), the effect on
longer-term ambient noise levels would be small when compared to existing daily traffic volumes on
Mission Drive. Because construction-related vehicle trips would not approach existing daily traffic
volumes, traffic noise would not increase by 3 dBA CNEL. A noise level increase of less than 3 dBA
would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, short-term,
construction-related impacts associated with worker commute and equipment transport to the
project site would be less than significant.
The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated during construction, which
includes demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural
coating on the project site. Construction is completed in discrete steps, each of which has its own
mix of equipment and, consequently, its own noise characteristics. These various sequential phases
would change the character of the noise generated on the site and, therefore, the noise levels
surrounding the site as construction progresses. Despite the variety in the type and size of
construction equipment, similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow
construction-related noise ranges to be categorized by work phase. Table I lists typical construction
equipment noise levels recommended for noise impact assessments, based on a distance of 50 ft
between the equipment and a noise receptor, taken from the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA 2006).
In addition to the reference maximum noise level, the usage factor provided in Table I is used to
calculate the hourly noise level impact for each piece of equipment based on the following
equation:
−+=50log20.).log(10..)(DFULEequipLeq
where: Leq (equip) = Leq at a receiver resulting from the operation of a single
piece of equipment over a specified time period.
E.L. = noise emission level of the particular piece of equipment at
a reference distance of 50 ft.
U.F. = usage factor that accounts for the fraction of time that the
equipment is in use over the specified period of time.
D = distance from the receiver to the piece of equipment.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 21
Table I: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels
Equipment Description Acoustical Usage Factor (%)1 Maximum Noise Level (Lmax) at 50 Feet2
Auger Drill Rig 20 84
Backhoes 40 80
Compactor (ground) 20 80
Compressor 40 80
Cranes 16 85
Dozers 40 85
Dump Trucks 40 84
Excavators 40 85
Flat Bed Trucks 40 84
Forklift 20 85
Front-end Loaders 40 80
Graders 40 85
Impact Pile Drivers 20 95
Jackhammers 20 85
Paver 50 77
Pickup Truck 40 55
Pneumatic Tools 50 85
Pumps 50 77
Rock Drills 20 85
Rollers 20 85
Scrapers 40 85
Tractors 40 84
Trencher 50 80
Welder 40 73
Source: FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide, Table 1 (FHWA 2006). Note: Noise levels reported in this table are rounded to the nearest whole number.
1 Usage factor is the percentage of time during a construction noise operation that a piece of construction equipment is operating at full power.
2 Maximum noise levels were developed based on Specification 721.560 from the Central Artery/
Tunnel program to be consistent with the City of Boston’s Noise Code for the “Big Dig” project. FHWA = Federal Highway Administration Lmax = maximum instantaneous sound level
Each piece of construction equipment operates as an individual point source. Using the following
equation, a composite noise level can be calculated when multiple sources of noise operate
simultaneously:
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 (𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝐿𝐿)=10 ∗log10 ��10𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿10𝐿𝐿
1 �
Using the equations from the methodology above, the reference information in Table I, and the
construction equipment list provided, the composite noise level of each construction phase was
calculated. The project construction composite noise levels at a distance of 50 feet would range
from 74 dBA Leq to 88 dBA Leq, with the highest noise levels occurring during the site preparation and
paving phases.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 22
Once composite noise levels are calculated, reference noise levels can then be adjusted for distance
using the following equation: 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 (𝑎𝑎𝑐𝑐 𝑑𝑑𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑎𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑐𝑐𝐿𝐿 𝑋𝑋)=𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 (𝑎𝑎𝑐𝑐 50 𝑓𝑓𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝑐𝑐)−20 ∗lo g10 �𝑋𝑋50�
In general, this equation shows that doubling the distance would decrease noise levels by 6 dBA,
while halving the distance would increase noise levels by 6 dBA.
Table J shows the nearest sensitive uses to the project site, their distance from the center of
construction activities, and composite noise levels expected during construction. These noise level
projections do not consider intervening topography or barriers. Construction equipment calculations
are provided in Appendix B.
Table J: Potential Construction Noise Impacts at Nearest Receptor
Receptor
(Location)
Composite Noise Level
(dBA Leq) at 50 feet1 Distance (feet) Composite Noise
Level (dBA Leq)
Residences (East)
88
115 81
Residences (West) 350 71
Residences (North) 350 71
Residences (South) 430 69
Source: Compiled by LSA (2022).
1 The composite construction noise level represents the paving/site preparation phases, which are
expected to result in the greatest noise level as compared to other phases.
dBA = A-weighted decibels Leq = equivalent continuous sound level
While construction noise will vary, it is expected that composite noise levels during construction at
the nearest off-site sensitive residential use to the east would reach an average noise level of
81 dBA Leq during daytime hours. These predicted noise levels would only occur when all
construction equipment is operating simultaneously and, therefore, are assumed to be rather
conservative in nature. While construction-related short-term noise levels have the potential to be
higher than existing ambient noise levels in the project area under existing conditions, the noise
impacts would no longer occur once project construction is completed.
As stated above, construction activities are regulated by the City’s Noise Ordinance. The proposed
project would comply with the construction hours specified in the City’s Noise Ordinance, which
states that construction activities are allowed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday
through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays.
As it relates to off-site uses, construction-related noise levels would remain below the daytime
90 dBA Leq 1-hour construction noise level criteria established by the FTA for residential and similar
sensitive uses and, therefore, would be considered less than significant. Best construction practices
presented at the end of this analysis shall be implemented to minimize noise impacts to surrounding
receptors.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 23
SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION IMPACTS
This construction vibration impact analysis discusses the level of human annoyance using vibration
levels in VdB and assesses the potential for building damages using vibration levels in PPV (in/sec).
This is because vibration levels calculated in RMS are best for characterizing human response to
building vibration, while calculating vibration levels in PPV is best for characterizing the potential for
damage.
Table K shows the PPV and VdB values at 25 ft from the construction vibration source. As shown in
Table K, bulldozers and other heavy-tracked construction equipment (expected to be used for this
project) generate approximately 0.089 PPV in/sec or 87 VdB of ground-borne vibration when
measured at 25 ft, based on the FTA Manual. The distance to the nearest buildings for vibration
impact analysis is measured between the nearest off-site buildings and the project construction
boundary (assuming the construction equipment would be used at or near the project setback line).
Table K: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction
Equipment
Equipment Reference PPV/LV at 25 ft
PPV (in/sec) LV (VdB)1
Pile Driver (Impact), Typical 0.644 104
Pile Driver (Sonic), Typical 0.170 93
Vibratory Roller 0.210 94
Hoe Ram 0.089 87
Large Bulldozer2 0.089 87
Caisson Drilling 0.089 87
Loaded Trucks2 0.076 86
Jackhammer 0.035 79
Small Bulldozer 0.003 58
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018).
1 RMS vibration velocity in decibels (VdB) is 1 µin/sec.
2 Equipment shown in bold is expected to be used on site. µin/sec = microinches per second ft = foot/feet
FTA = Federal Transit Administration
in/sec = inch/inches per second
LV = velocity in decibels PPV = peak particle velocity
RMS = root-mean-square
VdB = vibration velocity decibels
The formulae for vibration transmission are provided below, and Tables L and M provide a summary
of off-site construction vibration levels.
LvdB (D) = LvdB (25 ft) – 30 Log (D/25)
PPVequip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5
As shown in Table F, above, the threshold at which vibration levels would result in annoyance would
be 78 VdB for daytime residential uses. As shown in Table G, the FTA guidelines indicate that for a
non-engineered timber and masonry building, the construction vibration damage criterion is
0.2 in/sec in PPV.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 24
Table L: Potential Construction Vibration Annoyance Impacts at
Nearest Receptor
Receptor (Location) Reference Vibration
Level (VdB) at 25 ft1 Distance (ft) 2 Vibration Level
(VdB)
Residences (East)
87
115 67
Residences (West) 360 52
Residences (North) 360 52
Residences (South) 430 50
Source: Compiled by LSA (2022).
1 The reference vibration level is associated with a large bulldozer, which is expected to be
representative of the heavy equipment used during construction.
2 The reference distance is associated with the average condition, identified by the distance from the center of construction activities to surrounding uses. ft = foot/feet
VdB = vibration velocity decibels
Table M: Potential Construction Vibration Damage Impacts
at Nearest Receptor
Receptor
(Location)
Reference
Vibration Level
(PPV) at 25 ft1
Distance (ft)2
Vibration
Level
(PPV)
Residences (East)
0.089
5 0.995
Residences (West) 250 0.352
Residences (North) 10 0.003
Residences (South) 100 0.011
Source: Compiled by LSA (2022).
1 The reference vibration level is associated with a large bulldozer, which is expected to be
representative of the heavy equipment used during construction.
2 The reference distance is associated with the peak condition, identified by the distance
from the perimeter of construction activities to surrounding structures. ft = foot/feet PPV = peak particle velocity
Based on the information provided in Table L, vibration levels are expected to approach 67 VdB at
the closest residential uses located immediately east of the project site, which is below the 78 VdB
threshold for annoyance.
The closest structure to the project site is the residential uses to the east of site, approximately 5 ft
from the limits of construction activity. It is expected that vibration levels generated by dump trucks
and other large equipment that would be as close as 5 feet from the property line would generate
ground-borne vibration levels of up to 0.995 PPV (in/sec) at the closest structure to the project site.
This vibration level would exceed the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold considered safe for non-engineered
timber and masonry buildings. It is expected that construction activities utilizing heavy equipment
would generate vibration levels greater than 0.2 in/sec in PPV when operating within 10 feet of the
property line, which would result in a potentially significant impact. Therefore, the use of heavy
equipment should be prohibited within 15 feet of existing structures to ensure that vibration levels
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 25
are below the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold. At 15 feet, dump trucks and other large equipment would
generate ground-borne vibrations levels of up to 0.191 PPV (in/sec) at the closest structure to the
project site and would not exceed the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold. If heavy equipment is necessary
within 15 feet of the east boundary of the project site, further vibration assessments as presented in
mitigation measures (Mitigation Measure NOI-1) would be implemented to reduce potential
impacts. Therefore, construction would not result in any vibration damage and impacts would be
less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1.
Mitigation Measure NOI-1 Construction Vibration Damage. Due to the close proximity to
surrounding structures, the City of Rosemead (City) Director of
Community Development, or designee, shall verify prior to issuance
of demolition or grading permits, that the approved plans require
that the construction contractor shall implement the following
measures during project construction activities to ensure that
damage does not occur at surrounding structures:
The use of heavy equipment shall be prohibited within 15 feet
of existing structures. If heavy equipment is necessary within
15 feet of existing structures, the following measures shall be
implemented:
Identify structures that could be affected by ground-borne
vibration and would be located within 15 feet of where
heavy construction equipment would be used. This task
shall be conducted by a qualified structural engineer as
approved by the City’s Director of Community Development
or designee.
Develop a vibration monitoring and construction
contingency plan for approval by the City’s Director of
Community Development, or designee, to identify
structures where monitoring would be conducted; set up a
vibration monitoring schedule; define structure-specific
vibration limits; and address the need to conduct photo,
elevation, and crack surveys to document before and after
construction conditions. Construction contingencies would
be identified for when vibration levels approached the
limits.
At a minimum, monitor vibration during initial demolition
activities. Monitoring results may indicate the need for
more intensive measurements if vibration levels approach
the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold.
When vibration levels approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) limit,
suspend construction and implement contingencies as
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 26
identified in the approved vibration monitoring and
construction contingency plan to either lower vibration
levels or secure the affected structures.
Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would reduce impacts to a less than significant level
by prohibiting heavy equipment within 15 feet of existing structures or requiring a vibration
monitoring plan that would ensure that vibration levels are below the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) and vibration
damage would not occur. Therefore, vibration impacts would be less than significant with
mitigation. Because construction activities are regulated by the City’s Municipal Code, which states
that construction, maintenance, or demolition activities are not allowed between the hours of 8:00
p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturdays, or at any time on Sundays and federal
holidays, vibration impacts would not occur during the more sensitive nighttime hours.
LONG-TERM OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS
In order to assess the potential traffic impacts related to the proposed project, a Trip Generation
and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis (EPD Solutions, Inc. 2022) has been prepared.
Based on the analysis results, it was determined that a net additional 349 average daily trips (ADT)
would be generated by the proposed project. The expected traffic volume on the adjacent segment
of Mission Drive could be as low as 15,000 (City of Rosemead General Plan 2010). The following
equation was used to determine the potential impacts of the project:
Change in CNEL = 10 𝑙𝑙𝑐𝑐𝑙𝑙10�𝑉𝑉𝑒𝑒+𝑝𝑝/𝑉𝑉𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝐿𝐿𝑒𝑒�
where: Vexisting = existing daily volumes
Ve+p = existing daily volumes plus project
Change in CNEL = increase in noise level due to the project
The results of the calculations show that an increase of approximately 0.1 dBA CNEL is expected
along the streets adjacent to the project site. A noise level increase of less than 1 dBA would not be
perceptible to the human ear; therefore, the traffic noise increase in the vicinity of the project site
resulting from the proposed project would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.
LONG-TERM TRAFFIC-RELATED VIBRATION IMPACTS
The proposed project would not generate vibration levels related to on-site operations. In addition,
vibration levels generated from project-related traffic on the adjacent roadways are unusual for
on-road vehicles because the rubber tires and suspension systems of on-road vehicles provide
vibration isolation. Vibration levels generated from project-related traffic on the adjacent roadways
would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 27
BEST CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES
In addition to compliance with the City’s Municipal Code allowed hours of construction of 7:00 a.m.
to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, excluding Sunday and holidays, the following
recommendations would reduce construction noise to the extent feasible:
•The project construction contractor should equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile,
with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers, consistent with manufacturer’s
standards.
•The project construction contractor should locate staging areas away from off-site sensitive uses
during the later phases of project development.
•The project construction contractor should place all stationary construction equipment so that
emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site whenever
feasible.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 28
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
The dominant source of noise in the project vicinity is traffic noise from roadways in the vicinity of
the project.
EXTERIOR NOISE ASSESSMENT
Based on the monitoring results shown in Table H, the existing measured noise levels at the project
site closest to Mission Drive, approximately 95 feet away from Mission Drive centerline, is 57.0 dBA
CNEL. Based on the project site plan, the rear yards of units 1-4 and 37 are approximately 45 feet
away from Mission Drive centerline, resulting in estimated noise levels approaching 62 dBA, without
accounting for shielding provided by the proposed 6ft wall, which would reduce the noise levels by 5
dBA or more, resulting in noise levels below 60 dBA. This level is below the City’s 60 dBA CNEL
exterior noise level standard. Therefore, no additional mitigation would be required.
INTERIOR NOISE ASSESSMENT
As discussed above, per the California Code of Regulations and the City’s Implementation Actions,
an interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL or less is required for all noise-sensitive rooms.
Based on the expected future exterior noise levels at the façades of the lots closest to Mission Drive
approaching 62 dBA CNEL, a minimum noise reduction of 17 dBA would be required.
Based on reference information from transmission loss test reports for various Milgard windows
(Milgard 2008), standard building construction along with standard windows, typically in the STC 25-
28 range, a reduction of 25 dBA or more would be achieved with windows in a closed position. With
a reduction of 25 dBA or more, interior noise levels would remain below the City’s interior noise
level standard of 45 dBA CNEL. The project includes a HVAC system for all unit so that windows can
remained closed.
Once final plans are available to detail the exterior wall construction and a window manufacturer
has been chosen, a Final Acoustical Report (FAR) would be required to confirm the reduction
capability of the exterior façades and to identify any specific upgrades necessary to achieve an
interior noise level of 45 dBA CNEL or below.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22» 29
REFERENCES
City of Rosemead. 2010. General Plan Noise Element. April 13.
–––––. 2021. Municipal Code. Website:
https://library.municode.com/ca/rosemead/codes/code_of_ordinances (accessed July
2022). December 2.
County of Los Angeles. El Monte Airport Master Plan Report. 1995. June.
EPD Solutions, Inc. 2022. Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis for
8601 Mission Drive. January 21.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2006. Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide.
January. Washington, D.C. Website: www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_
noise/rcnm/rcnm.pdf (accessed March 2022).
Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.
Office of Planning and Environment. Report No. 0123. September.
Harris, Cyril M., editor. 1991. Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control.
Third Edition.
Milgard. 2008. Various Transmission Loss Reports.
State of California. 2020. 2019 California Green Building Standards Code.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1978. Protective Noise Levels, Condensed Version of
EPA Levels Document, EPA 550/9-79-100. November.
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22»
APPENDIX A
NOISE MONITORING DATA
Noise Measurement Survey – 24 HR
Project Number: ESL2201.32 Test Personnel: Kevin Nguyendo
Project Name: Mission Villas Equipment: Spark 706RC (SN:18905) Site Number: LT-1 Date: 6/21/2022 Time: From 11:00 a.m. To 11:00 a.m.
Site Location: Southern corner on a fence along the backyard of 8623 Mission Dr, Rosemead,
CA 91770. Primary Noise Sources: Regular traffic noise on Mission Drive.
Comments: On a chain link fence all around.
Photo:
Long-Term (24-Hour) Noise Level Measurement Results at LT-1
Start Time Date Noise Level (dBA) Leq Lmax Lmin
11:00 AM 6/21/22 51.5 71.5 40.1
12:00 PM 6/21/22 50.9 62.6 39.5
1:00 PM 6/21/22 51.7 66.0 41.6
2:00 PM 6/21/22 52.1 67.2 41.1
3:00 PM 6/21/22 52.5 72.3 41.3
4:00 PM 6/21/22 52.3 70.5 39.7
5:00 PM 6/21/22 52.2 64.6 39.5
6:00 PM 6/21/22 54.6 76.6 41.3
7:00 PM 6/21/22 56.1 73.6 40.7
8:00 PM 6/21/22 52.0 75.3 39.0
9:00 PM 6/21/22 49.2 67.5 38.3
10:00 PM 6/21/22 47.6 68.6 37.5
11:00 PM 6/21/22 45.1 61.2 37.1
12:00 AM 6/22/22 44.7 61.6 37.1
1:00 AM 6/22/22 42.9 61.8 35.6
2:00 AM 6/22/22 42.6 60.5 36.2
3:00 AM 6/22/22 43.0 60.1 36.4
4:00 AM 6/22/22 48.3 68.3 37.0
5:00 AM 6/22/22 47.7 64.3 37.7
6:00 AM 6/22/22 52.1 70.1 42.0
7:00 AM 6/22/22 53.4 67.8 42.4
8:00 AM 6/22/22 62.5 87.3 44.7
9:00 AM 6/22/22 61.8 88.4 45.2
10:00 AM 6/22/22 55.1 74.4 42.7
Source: Compiled by LSA Associates, Inc. (2022). dBA = A-weighted decibel Leq = equivalent continuous sound level Lmax = maximum instantaneous noise level Lmin = minimum measured sound level
Noise Measurement Survey – 24 HR
Project Number: ESL2201.32 Test Personnel: Kevin Nguyendo
Project Name: Mission Villas Equipment: Spark 706RC (SN:18906) Site Number: LT-2 Date: 5/27/22 Time: From 11:00 a.m. To 11:00 a.m.
Site Location: On the western corner bordering a power line near a fence next to a power
Line tower and farm. Primary Noise Sources: Farming vehicles operating in the property to the west of the project
Site.
Comments: Chain link fence near monitor
Photo:
Long-Term (24-Hour) Noise Level Measurement Results at LT-2
Start Time Date Noise Level (dBA) Leq Lmax Lmin 11:00 AM 6/21/22 51.3 71.8 41.3
12:00 PM 6/21/22 48.6 60.9 40.9
1:00 PM 6/21/22 49.4 66.8 41.6
2:00 PM 6/21/22 49.3 60.3 41.6
3:00 PM 6/21/22 49.8 64.5 42.2
4:00 PM 6/21/22 48.3 62.7 40.9
5:00 PM 6/21/22 48.1 65.9 41.0
6:00 PM 6/21/22 47.6 64.0 41.3
7:00 PM 6/21/22 54.3 74.7 41.8
8:00 PM 6/21/22 46.4 65.9 41.3
9:00 PM 6/21/22 45.4 61.1 40.4
10:00 PM 6/21/22 43.9 60.9 40.3
11:00 PM 6/21/22 44.5 62.4 39.8
12:00 AM 6/22/22 41.9 51.6 39.1
1:00 AM 6/22/22 47.6 74.2 38.9
2:00 AM 6/22/22 42.3 62.9 39.5
3:00 AM 6/22/22 42.7 64.4 39.8
4:00 AM 6/22/22 47.5 67.2 40.3
5:00 AM 6/22/22 47.8 60.5 41.3
6:00 AM 6/22/22 50.7 68.4 43.7
7:00 AM 6/22/22 52.5 62.0 44.0
8:00 AM 6/22/22 58.2 78.9 44.6
9:00 AM 6/22/22 59.8 80.5 44.9
10:00 AM 6/22/22 55.9 77.4 43.8
Source: Compiled by LSA Associates, Inc. (2022). dBA = A-weighted decibel Leq = equivalent continuous sound level Lmax = maximum instantaneous noise level Lmin = minimum measured sound level
Noise Measurement Survey
Project Number: ESL2201.32 Test Personnel: Kevin Nguyendo
Project Name: Mission Villas Equipment: Larson Davis 831
Site Location: Northeast corner of project site, south of 8612 Zerelda St.
Primary Noise Sources: Someone watering garden, birds chirping and generally quiet.
Measurement Results
Atmospheric Conditions:
Comments: File # 58.
Site Number: ST-1 Date: 6/21/22 Time: From 11:14 a.m. To 11:34 a.m.
dBA
Leq 45.1
Lmax 52.8
Lmin 33.3
Lpeak 96.5
L2 49.9
L8 47.9 L25 45.9
L50 44.3
SEL
Maximum Wind Velocity (mph)
Average Wind Velocity (mph) 5
Temperature (F) 81
Relative Humidity (%) 36
Comments:
Location Photo:
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS AUGUST 2022 MISSION VILLAS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
P:\ESL2201.32\PRODUCT\NoiseAndVibrationReport_08022022.docx «08/02/22»
APPENDIX B
CONSTRUCTION NOISE CALCULATIONS
Phase: Demolition
Lmax Leq
Concrete Saw 1 90 20 50 0.5 90 83
Excavator 3 81 40 50 0.5 81 82
Dozer 2 82 40 50 0.5 82 81
Combined at 50 feet 91 87
Combined at Receptor 115 feet 84 80
Combined at Receptor 350 feet 74 70
Combined at Receptor 430 feet 72 68
Phase: Site Preparation
Lmax Leq
Dozer 3 82 40 50 0.5 82 83
Tractor 4 84 40 50 0.5 84 86
Combined at 50 feet 86 88
Combined at Receptor 110 feet 79 81
Combined at Receptor 360 feet 69 71
Combined at Receptor 430 feet 67 69
Phase: Grading
Lmax Leq
Excavator 1 81 40 50 0.5 81 77
Grader 1 85 40 50 0.5 85 81
Dozer 1 82 40 50 0.5 82 78
Tractor 3 84 40 50 0.5 84 85
Combined at 50 feet 89 87
Combined at Receptor 115 feet 82 80
Combined at Receptor 360 feet 72 70
Combined at Receptor 430 feet 71 69
Phase:Building Construstion
Lmax Leq
Crane 1 81 16 50 0.5 81 73
Man Lift 3 75 20 50 0.5 75 73
Generator 1 81 50 50 0.5 81 78
Tractor 3 84 40 50 0.5 84 85
Welder / Torch 1 74 40 50 0.5 74 70
Combined at 50 feet 87 86
Combined at Receptor 115 feet 80 79
Combined at Receptor 360 feet 70 69
Combined at Receptor 430 feet 69 67
Phase:Paving
Lmax Leq
Tractor 1 84 40 50 0.5 84 80
Drum Mixer 2 80 50 50 0.5 80 80
Paver 1 77 50 50 0.5 77 74
All Other Equipment > 5 HP 2 85 50 50 0.5 85 85
Roller 2 80 20 50 0.5 80 76
Combined at 50 feet 89 88
Combined at Receptor 115 feet 82 80
Combined at Receptor 360 feet 72 71
Combined at Receptor 430 feet 70 69
Phase:Architectural Coating
Lmax Leq
Compressor (air)1 78 40 50 0.5 78 74
Combined at 50 feet 78 74
Combined at Receptor 115 feet 71 67
Combined at Receptor 360 feet 61 57
Combined at Receptor 430 feet 59 55
Sources: RCNM
1- Percentage of time that a piece of equipment is operating at full power.
dBA – A-weighted Decibels
Lmax- Maximum Level
Leq- Equivalent Level
QuantityEquipment
Equipment Noise Level (dBA)Ground
Effects
Distance to
Receptor (ft)
Usage
Factor1
Reference (dBA)
50 ft LmaxQuantity
Noise Level (dBA)Ground
Effects
Distance to
Receptor (ft)
Usage
Factor1
Reference (dBA)
50 ft Lmax
Noise Level (dBA)
Construction Calculations
Equipment Quantity
Reference (dBA)
50 ft Lmax
Usage
Factor1 Distance to
Receptor (ft)
Ground
Effects
Noise Level (dBA)
Equipment Quantity
Reference (dBA)
50 ft Lmax
Usage
Factor1 Distance to
Receptor (ft)
Ground
Effects
Ground
Effects
Noise Level (dBA)Equipment Quantity
Reference (dBA)
50 ft Lmax
Usage
Factor1 Distance to
Receptor (ft)
Noise Level (dBA)Equipment Quantity
Reference (dBA)
50 ft Lmax
Usage
Factor1 Distance to
Receptor (ft)
Ground
Effects
Urban Planning ■ Due Diligence ■ Entitlements ■ CEQA/NEPA ■ Development Services ■ Management ■ Public Outreach
2355 Main Street, Suite 100 ■ Irvine, Calif. 92614
949.794.1180 ■ info@epdsolutions.com
Date: September 8, 2022
Prepared by: Meghan Macias, TE
To: Lily Valenzuela, Planning & Economic Development Manager, City of Rosemead
Jana Robbins, Contract Traffic Engineer, City of Rosemead
Site: 8601 Mission Drive
Subject: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis
This technical memorandum evaluates the trip generation and need to prepare a level of service (LOS) or
vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis for the proposed 8601 Mission Drive Project. The project is located on
Mission Drive east of Walnut Grove Avenue in the City of Rosemead. This memo will evaluate the project
using the attached City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines for VMT and LOS Assessment.
Project Description
The project proposes to construct 29 single family dwelling units and eight townhome dwelling units. Access
to the project would be provided by one driveway on Mission Drive. The project vicinity map is shown in
Figure 1 and the project site plan is shown in Figure 2.
Project Trip Generation and LOS Analysis Screening
The project trip generation was prepared using trip rates for Single-Family Detached Housing (Land Use
Code 210) and Multifamily Housing Low Rise (Land Use Code 220) from the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)1. Table 1 presents the trip generation estimate for the proposed project. As shown in Table
1, the project is forecast to generate 327 daily trips, including 23 trips during the AM peak hour and 31
trips during the PM peak hour.
Generally, a LOS analysis may be required if a project generates over 50 peak hour trips. The Project
generates 23 AM peak hour trips and 31 PM peak hour trips; therefore, LOS analysis is not warranted for
the project as the peak hour trip generation is minimal.
VMT Screening Analysis
Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed by Governor Brown in 2013 and required the Governor’s Office of Planning
and Research (OPR) to amend the CEQA Guidelines to provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating
Transportation impacts. SB 743 specified that the new criteria should promote the reduction of greenhouse
gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks and a diversity of land uses. The bill
also specified that delay-based level of service could no longer be considered an indicator of a significant
impact on the environment. In response, Section 15064.3 was added to the CEQA Guidelines beginning
January 1, 2019. Section 15064.3 - Determining the Significance of Transportation Impacts states that
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts and provides lead
agencies with the discretion to choose the most appropriate methodology and thresholds for evaluating VMT.
City of Rosemead VMT Screening
The City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines provides VMT screening thresholds to identify projects that
would be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT and therefore could be screened out
1 Trip Generation, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). 2021.
8601 Mission Drive Project
Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
2 | P a g e
from further analysis. If a project meets one of the following criteria, then the VMT impact of the project
would be considered less than significant and no further analysis of VMT would be required:
1. The project is in a Transit Priority Area (TPA).
2. The project is in a low VMT area.
3. The project proposes one of the following local-serving land uses:
o Local-serving retail less than 50,000 sf in size, including:
▪ Gas stations
▪ Banks
▪ Restaurants
▪ Shopping Center
o Local serving K-12 school
o Local park
o Daycare centers
o Local-serving hotel (e.g., non-destination hotel)
o Student housing projects on or adjacent to a college campus
o Local-serving assembly use (places of worship, community organizations)
o Community institutions (public libraries, fire stations, local government)
o Affordable, supportive, or transitional housing
o Assisted living facilities
o Senior housing (as defined by Housing and Urban Development)
o Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the
RTP/SCS (Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy)
o Project generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips. This generally corresponds to the
following “typical” development potentials:
▪ 11 single family housing units
▪ 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units
▪ 10,000 SF of office
▪ 15,000 SF of light industrial
▪ 63,000 SF of warehousing
▪ 79,000 SF of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse
o Public parking garages and public parking lots
The applicability of each criterion to the project is discussed below.
Screening Criteria 1 – TPA: According to the City’s guidelines, projects within one-half mile of an existing or
planned major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor may be presumed to have
a less than significant impact. The project is not located in a TPA; therefore, the project does not satisfy
Screening Criteria 1 - TPA.
Screening Criteria 2 – Low VMT Area: The City’s guidelines define low VMT areas as traffic analysis zones
(TAZs) with a total daily VMT/Service Population (employment plus population) that is 15% less than the San
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) baseline. If the proposed project is residential, the
project is considered “screened out” if it is located within the Low VMT areas of the “PA/Residential Home-
Based VMT per Capita”. Alternatively, if the predominant land uses in the vicinity are nominally of the same
type as the proposed project and the proposed project is reasonably expected to generate similar VMT as
the existing land uses, the project is considered screened out if it is in the low VMT area for the “Total Daily
VMT per Service Population”.
The project proposes 29 single family dwelling units and eight townhome dwelling units. As shown on Figure
3, the project is surrounded by other residential uses, including single family and multifamily residential. As
stated in the City’s guidelines, projects that are located in areas with predominately similar land uses can
8601 Mission Drive Project
Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
3 | P a g e
utilize the SGVCOG screening tool. Therefore, the SGVCOG screening tool is appropriate to use for the
project.
As shown in the attached SGVCOG screening analysis, the project is in a low VMT area; therefore, the
project would meet Screening Criteria 2 – Low VMT Area.
Screening Criteria 3 – Land Use: The project proposes to construct 29 single family housing units and eight
townhome housing units, which is above the 11 single family housing unit threshold and would not meet the
local serving or low trip generating land use criteria. Therefore, the project would not meet Screening Criteria
3 – Land Use.
Summary
As shown in Table 1, the project is forecast to generate 349 daily trips, including 26 trips during the AM
peak hour and 35 trips during the PM peak hour. The project trip generation would not warrant evaluation
of the LOS as the project would generate fewer than 50 peak hour trips.
The project was evaluated using the City of Rosemead VMT screening thresholds to determine if the project
would require a VMT analysis. The project would meet the City’s screening criteria for Low VMT Area;
therefore, the project VMT impacts would be considered less than significant and further analysis of VMT
would not be required.
If you have any questions about this information, please contact me at (949) 794-1186 or
meghan@epdsolutions.com.
8601 Mission Drive Project
Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
4 | P a g e
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
8601 Mission Drive Project
Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
5 | P a g e
Figure 2: Project Site Plan
8601 Mission Drive Project
Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
6 | P a g e
Figure 3: Surrounding Land Uses
8601 Mission Drive Project
Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
7 | P a g e
Table 1: Project Trip Generation
Land Use Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates
Single-Family Detached Housing DU 9.43 0.18 0.52 0.70 0.59 0.35 0.94
Multifamily Housing (Low Rise)DU 6.74 0.10 0.30 0.40 0.32 0.19 0.51
Project Trip Generation
8601 Mission Drive SF 29 DU 273 5 15 20 17 10 27
8601 Mission Drive TH 8 DU 54 1 2 3 3 1 4
Total Trip Generation 327 6 17 23 20 11 31
DU = Dwelling Units
2 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021. Land Use Code 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low Rise)
Not Close to Transit.
1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021. Land Use Code 210 - Single-Family Detached
Housing.
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Units
8601 Mission Drive Project
Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
8 | P a g e
ATTACHMENT A – CITY OF ROSEMEAD TRANSPORTATION STUDY
GUIDELINES FOR VMT AND LOS ASSESSMENT
1493504.1
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment
October 2020
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
2
Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Background Information .................................................................................................................................. 3
Purpose of Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines ....................................................................... 4
Application of Guidelines ................................................................................................................................. 5
Organization Guidelines .................................................................................................................................. 6
Non-CEQA Transportation Assessment 7
Level of Service Analysis Procedure ............................................................................................................. 7
On-Site Parking Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 10
Access and Circulation Analysis .................................................................................................................. 11
CEQA Transportation Assessment - VMT Analysis 12
VMT Analysis Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 12
CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds .................................................................................................................... 18
VMT Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................. 18
CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis 20
Transportation Impact Study Format 21
Attachments 23
Attachment A: VMT Analysis Flowchart ................................................................................................... 23
Attachment B: SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool User Guide ........................................................... 24
Attachment C: Detailed VMT Forecasting Information ..................................................................... 25
Attachment D: VMT Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................. 28
Attachment D: VMT Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................. 28
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
3
Introduction
These guidelines describe the transportation analysis requirements for land development, roadway
projects, and specific plans in the City of Rosemead. Guidelines are provided for evaluating a
project’s environmental transportation impacts and effects on the local transportation system.
The purpose of these guidelines is to provide guidance on how to prepare transportation studies
in the City of Rosemead in conformance with all applicable City and State regulations.
Background Information
Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), signed by the Governor in 2013, has changed the way transportation
impacts are identified. Specifically, the legislation directed the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to look at different metrics for identifying transportation impacts under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Final OPR guidelines were released in December 2018 and
identified Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the preferred metric moving forward. The Natural Resources Agency completed the rule making process to modify the CEQA guidelines in December
of 2018. The CEQA Guidelines identify that, by July 1, 2020 all lead agencies must use VMT as the
new transportation metric for identifying transportation impacts for land use and transportation
projects.
In anticipation of the change to VMT, the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) undertook the SGVCOG SB 743 Implementation Study to assist with answering important
implementation questions about the methodology, thresholds, and mitigation approaches for VMT
impact analysis in its member agencies. The study includes the following main components.
• Analysis Methodologies Memorandum – Identification of potential thresholds that can be
considered when establishing thresholds of significance for VMT assessment and
recommendations of analysis methodologies for VMT impact screening and analysis
• Mitigation Memorandum – Types of mitigation that can be considered for VMT mitigation
• VMT Assessment Tool – A web-based tool that can be used for VMT screening and mitigation recommendation
The City of Rosemead utilized the information produced through the Implementation Study to
adopt a methodology and significance thresholds for use in CEQA compliance. As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) below, lead agencies are encouraged to formally adopt their
significance thresholds and this is a key part of the SB 743 implementation process.
(b) Each public agency is encouraged to develop and publish thresholds of significance that the agency uses
in the determination of the significance of environmental effects. Thresholds of significance to be adopted for
general use as part of the lead agency’s environmental review process must be adopted by ordinance,
resolution, rule, or regulation, and developed through a public review process and be supported by substantial
evidence. Lead agencies may also use thresholds on a case-by-case basis as provided in Section 15064(b)(2).
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
4
The City has produced these Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to outline the specific
steps for complying with the new CEQA expectations for VMT analysis and the applicable general
plan consistency requirements related to Level of Service (LOS).
It should be noted that CEQA requirements change as the CEQA Guidelines are periodically updated
and/or legal opinions are rendered that change how analysis is completed. As such, the City may
continually review the guidelines for applicability and consultants should contact the City to ensure
that they are applying the City’s most recent guidelines for project impact assessment.
CEQA Changes
A key element of the changes brought about by SB 743 is the elimination of auto delay, LOS, and
other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining
significant environmental impacts. This change is intended to assist in balancing the needs of
congestion management with statewide goals related to infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
SB 743 includes amendments to current congestion management law that allows cities and counties
to effectively opt-out of the LOS standards that would otherwise apply in areas where Congestion Management Plans (CMPs) are still used. Further, SB 743 required OPR to update the CEQA
Guidelines and establish criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts. In
December 2018, OPR released their final recommended guidelines based on feedback from the public, public agencies, and various organizations and individuals. OPR recommended VMT as the
most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts for land use projects and land use
plans. For transportation projects, lead agencies may select their own preferred metric but must be
prepared to support their decision with substantial evidence that complies with CEQA expectations.
SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS outside of CEQA review for other transportation planning or analysis purposes (i.e., general plans, impact fee
programs, corridor studies, congestion mitigation, or ongoing network monitoring).
Level of Service Policy
The Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan has established Policy goal 1.3 which states that every feasible effort should be made to provide LOS D operations or better at intersections.
The LOS standards apply to discretionary approvals of new land use and transportation projects.
Therefore, these guidelines also include instructions for vehicle LOS analysis consistent with City requirements.
Purpose of Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines
State and Federal laws require the correlation of Land Use Element building intensities in a General
Plan with the Circulation Element capacity. A TIA is required by the City so that the impact of land
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
5
use proposals on the existing and future circulation system can be adequately assessed and to
ensure that CEQA and Congestion Management Program laws and guidelines are met.
The following TIA Guidelines identify CEQA based requirements and non-CEQA based requirements intended for any person or entity who is proposing development in the City and should be used in
coordination with the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines and Municipal Code to guide the development
review process.
For the past several decades, the preparation of a TIA was integrated into the CEQA process, in
which the TIA was used primarily to analyze a project’s impacts using intersection and/or roadway segment LOS. However, with the passage of SB 743, changes to the TIA process are necessary.
Specifically, a TIA may be needed as a stand-alone document which is a requirement of project
approval and will include information for the decision makers that is not required as part of the CEQA process.
The purpose of these TIA guidelines is to provide general instructions for analyzing the potential
transportation impacts of proposed development projects. These guidelines present the recommended format and methodology that should generally be utilized in the preparation of
TIA’s.
Application of Guidelines
An applicant seeking project approval will submit the proposed project to the City with a planning and land use application. After a preliminary review of the project by City Staff, the applicant will
be notified by the project planner as to whether or not a Level of Service based TIA or a Focused
Traffic Analysis is required. If a project is not eligible for project screening and is required to complete a Level of Service based TIA, then the TIA should consider changes in both LOS and VMT.
A TIA which includes LOS analysis may be required for a proposed project when the trips generated by a proposed development will add more than 50 project trips during either the AM or PM peak hours to any signalized intersection. The project study area will be determined by City staff during preliminary application review.
Furthermore, a TIA or Focused Traffic Analysis must include a VMT assessment for a proposed project that does NOT satisfy one or more of the following project screening criteria:
• Transit Priority Areas Screening
• Low VMT-generating Areas Screening
• Project Type Screening
See Section, “CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis” for details on this screening criteria.
Projects may be screened from VMT analysis and require level-of-service analysis, or vice-versa. In cases where insufficient information is available to make a preliminary assessment of a proposal’s effect on traffic, the City shall determine, at its discretion, whether a TIA will be required.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
6
Organization Guidelines
This document is organized to provide background information, assessment for congestion management/General Plan Consistency (e.g. LOS analysis), and CEQA assessment (e.g. VMT
analysis). The following sections are included:
• Introduction
• Non-CEQA Transportation Assessment
• CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis
• CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis
• Transportation Impact Analysis Format
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
7
Non-CEQA Transportation Assessment
Level of Service Analysis Procedure
Traffic analysis should be prepared under the direction and/or by a registered traffic engineer,
registered civil engineer, or qualified transportation planner. To establish a mutually agreeable
scope of work for the traffic analysis, the analyst and project applicant should consult with Planning Department staff and Public Works staff to identify study area, assumptions, and methodologies of
the traffic analysis. All assumptions and methodologies of the LOS analysis are subject to review
and approval of City staff.
Traffic Counts
The traffic analysis should not use any traffic counts that are more than two years old without
approval of City staff. If traffic counts taken within the last two years are not available, then new
traffic counts should be collected by a qualified data collection firm. Turning movement data at the study intersections should be collected in 15-minute intervals during the hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00
AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM, unless City Staff specifies other hours (e.g., for a signal warrant determination, school traffic or weekend analysis). Unless otherwise required, all traffic counts
should generally be conducted when local schools or colleges are in session, on days of good
weather, on Tuesdays through Thursdays during non-Summer months, and should avoid being taken on weeks with a holiday.
Trip Generation
The City will accept the trip generation rate of the latest edition of the Trip Generation Manual
published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. In addition, with City approval, analysis for a proposed project with trip generation rates not provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, may
use rates from other agencies or locally approved studies for specific land uses or driveway counts
at similar facilities with the same characteristics of the proposed project. Documentation supporting the use of these trip generation rates will be required.
The traffic analysis should include justification for trip generation credits such as existing uses,
transit, and internal capture. The pass-by traffic credit should be calculated based upon the Institute
of Transportation Engineer data or city approved special studies. Analysis at project driveways will
require the assumption of full project trips prior to pass-by credits.
Trip Distribution and Assignment
Documentation should be provided for the trip distribution and assignment for vehicle trips to and
from the site along specific roadways that will be utilized by project generated traffic. The basic
methodology and assumptions used to develop trip distribution and assignments must be clearly
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
8
stated and approved by City staff. The basis for trip distribution should consider any available
demographic or market data in the area as well as the project’s location relative to the regional
roadway system.
The trip assignment for the project should be based on existing and projected travel patterns and
the future roadway network and its travel time characteristics.
Traffic Forecasts
The traffic analysis should include the total traffic which is expected to occur at buildout of the proposed project. This means that the analyst preparing the transportation study should include all
the cumulative effects of the project. The analyst may obtain the ambient growth rate in the project
vicinity from the City’s General Plan, the latest version of the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) Travel Demand Model or another appropriate sub-area travel demand model.
Projects which have been approved or planned, but not built in the vicinity of the proposed project should be verified as included in the analysis and approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
Analysis Methodologies
The City uses the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to evaluate AM and PM peak
hour LOS at signalized intersections. The latest version of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology will be used to evaluate the AM and PM peak hour LOS at unsignalized intersections.
The peak hour will be identified as the highest one-hour period in both AM and PM counted
periods, as determined by four consecutive 15-minute count intervals. The following parameters should be used in determining the LOS at the intersections within the City.
ICU Methodology (signalized intersections)
• A minimum clearance interval of 0.10 of green time.
• Lane capacities of 1,800 per hour per lane for through and turn lanes.
• Lane capacities of 3,240 per hour for dual turn lanes
HCM Methodology (unsignalized intersections)
• A peak hour factor (PHF) based on observed conditions shall be used for existing conditions.
• A PHF of 0.95 shall be used for future conditions.
Pedestrian activity should be considered on a case by case basis using reductions in saturation flow
rates for affected lanes as determined by sound engineering judgement. The HCM is the best source of guidance for assessment of pedestrian influences on flow rates.
Table 1 summarizes the range of values and LOS designations.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
9
Table 1: Level of Service Criteria
LOS
LOS Criteria
Description Signalized Intersection (v/c) Unsignalized Intersection (delay)
A ≤0.600 ≤10.0 EXCELLENT. Operations with very low delay and most vehicles do not stop.
B >0.600 and ≤0.700 >10.0 and ≤15.0 VERY GOOD. Operations with good progression
but with some restricted movements.
C >0.700 and ≤0.800 >15.0 and ≤25.0
GOOD. Operations where a significant number of
vehicles are stopping with some backup and light
congestion.
D >0.800 and ≤0.900 >25.0 and ≤35.0
FAIR. Operations where congestion is noticeable,
longer delays occur, and many vehicles stop. The
proportion of vehicles not stopping declines.
E >0.900 and ≤1.000 >35.0 and ≤50.0 POOR. Operations where there is high delay,
extensive queueing, and poor progression.
F >1.000 >50.0
FAILURE. Operations that are unacceptable to most
drivers, when the arrival rates exceed the capacity
of the intersection.
Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual
Analysis Scenarios
The following identifies the analysis scenarios that should be evaluated for LOS analysis (at the
discretion of City staff).
• Existing Conditions:
Existing traffic conditions analysis based on current traffic data, typically collected within
the previous 2-year period.
• Existing plus Project:
Existing traffic conditions plus traffic generated by the proposed project.
• Opening Year:
Existing traffic conditions plus ambient growth and traffic from all the development within
the study area for which an application has been submitted (“pending projects”), or that have been approved but not yet constructed. There may be multiple opening years if the
project is proposed in phases.
• Opening Year plus Project:
Traffic conditions of existing plus ambient growth and approved and pending
developments, plus traffic generated by the proposed project.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
10
Projects that are to be constructed in more than one phase will require interim year future analysis
to address each phase of the development and its associated traffic effects. The year(s) to be analyzed will coincide with the scheduled phasing and will be approved by City staff.
A table is to be included which identifies the forecast LOS for each intersection within the defined study area. This summary table shall present LOS for all scenarios evaluated-including
improvements.
Transportation Effects
The acceptable LOS for intersections in the City is D or better as established in the City’s General
Plan. Any intersection operating at a LOS of E or F is considered deficient. The project-related
increase in volume-to-capacity (V/C) is equal to or greater than 0.020 at an intersection that degrades from acceptable operations (LOS D or better) to unacceptable operations (LOS E or F).
For signalized intersections, the City’s non-CEQA thresholds for volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) are
met if the following is met, and the City at its discretion may require improvements or other strategies to reduce the V/C ratio to acceptable levels:
• The project-related increase in V/C is equal to or greater than 0.020 at an intersection
that is already operating at LOS E or F.
For unsignalized intersections, the City’s non-CEQA thresholds for Level of Service (LOS) are met if
both of the following conditions are met, and the City at its discretion may require improvements or other strategies to reduce the Level of Service (LOS) to acceptable levels:
• The addition of project traffic to an intersection results in the degradation of overall
intersection operations from acceptable operations (LOS D or better) to unacceptable operations (LOS E or F).
• The project-related increase in traffic contributes 10 percent or more to the total peak hour volume at an intersection that is already operating at LOS E or F.
On-Site Parking Analysis
This analysis will address the on-site parking supply versus parking required per City code. If the
proposed development is of mixed-use type, a table should be included presenting each land use, its size, and the code parking requirement. This table should clearly indicate how the code parking
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
11
was calculated and include the proposed on-site parking supply together with the resultant surplus
or deficit from code requirements.
Should the on-site parking supply be less than required by the City code, a detailed explanation justifying a reduction to the code requirement must be included. Note that this does not eliminate
the need for any zoning code variance. Shared parking evaluations will be considered when
appropriate.
Access and Circulation Analysis
The project’s effect on access points and on-site circulation shall be analyzed. The analysis shall, as appropriate, include the following:
• Number of access points proposed for the project site.
• If a project is proposing full access at project driveways, then it must be demonstrated that
striping and lane widths on adjacent streets will allow for full movements in and out.
• Spacing between driveways and intersections.
• Potential signalization of driveways.
• On-site stacking distance. (Including uses with a drive thru.)
• If project includes a restaurant with a drive-thru, a queueing analysis may be required addressing available on-site stacking and demonstrate that no drive thru stacking will spill
onto adjacent public streets.
• Shared access.
• Turn conflicts/restrictions.
• Adequate sight distance at project driveways.
• Driveway improvements.
• Pedestrian connections.
• Show truck turning templates for truck deliveries and trash trucks on site.
• If the project involves large trucks (industrial, manufacturing, warehouse use), then a truck
turning template will be required at each project driveway showing truck paths to docking
and delivery zones.
• Any other operational characteristics (as identified by City staff).
If the proposed project is a residential or commercial use with privacy gates, the applicant shall
provide a stacking analysis for review and approval. The adequacy of the interface with the arterial
network will need to be demonstrated and necessary improvements to adjacent intersections may
be required.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
12
CEQA Transportation Assessment - VMT
Analysis
VMT Analysis Methodology
For purposes of SB 743 compliance, a VMT analysis should be conducted for land development
projects subject to CEQA and would apply to projects that have the potential to increase the baseline VMT per service population (e.g. population plus employment) for the City. Normalizing
VMT per service population (e.g. creating a rate by dividing VMT by service population) provides a
transportation efficiency metric that the analysis is based on. All assumptions and methodologies of the VMT analysis are subject to review and approval by the City Staff.
A flowchart of the VMT analysis process is attached to these guidelines. See Attachment A, “VMT
Analysis Flowchart”. A web-based tool that is included with this implementation study to assist with VMT assessment screening and mitigation recommendations. A user guide for use of this tool is
attached to these guidelines. See Attachment B, “SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool Users Guide.”
Project Screening
There are three types of screening that may be applied to effectively screen projects from project-
level assessment. These screening steps are summarized below:
Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
Projects located within a TPA1 may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent
substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project:
1. Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;
2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than
required by the City;
1 A TPA is defined as a half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor per the definitions below. Public Resources Code § 21099(a)(7)
Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 - ‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.
Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 - For purposes of this section, a ‘high-quality transit corridor’ means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
13
3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by
the lead agency, with input from the Southern California Association of Governments
[SCAG]); or
4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income
residential units.
To identify if the project is in a TPA, the analyst may review TPA map included in the SGVCOG
VMT assessment tool. Additionally, the analyst should confirm with all local transit providers that
no recent changes in transit service have occurred in the project area (e.g. addition or removal of
transit lines, addition or removal of transit stops, or changes to service frequency).
Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening
Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other
employment-related and mixed-use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the
project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service
population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area.
• If the proposed project is residential, the project is considered “screened out”, if it is located within the Low VMT areas of the “PA/Residential Home-Based VMT per Capita”.
Alternatively, if the predominant land uses in the vicinity are nominally of the same type
as the proposed project and the proposed project is reasonably expected to generate similar VMT as the existing land uses, the project is considered screened out if it
is in the low VMT area for the “Total Daily VMT per Service Population”.
• If the proposed project is office, commercial or industrial, the project is considered “screened out”, if it is located within the Low VMT areas of the “PA/Daily Home-Based
Work VMT per Employee”. Alternatively, if the predominant land uses in the vicinity are nominally of the same type as the proposed project and the proposed project is reasonably expected to generate similar VMT as the existing land uses, the project is
considered screened out if it is in the low VMT area for the “Total Daily VMT Service per Population”.
• If the proposed project is retail, the project is considered “screened out” if it is located
within the low VMT areas of the “Total Daily VMT per Service Population”.
• If the proposed project is a mixed-use development, all components of the project should
be analyzed against the low VMT maps for either the dominant project land use (if applicable) or for each individual land use (if there is no dominant project land use).
Reductions in VMT may be applied to account for internal trips that would occur within the
project site. The project must be analyzed as a whole and all elements must screen out to qualify for Low VMT screening.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
14
For this screening, the SCAG travel forecasting model was used to measure VMT performance for
individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). TAZs are geographic polygons similar to Census block
groups used to represent areas of homogenous travel behavior. Total daily VMT per service population was estimated for each TAZ. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project
land uses would alter the existing built environment in such a way as to increase the rate or length
of vehicle trips. The project applicant should document whether or not any increase to the trip generation rate or length of vehicle trips is expected.
To identify if the project is in a low VMT-generating area, the analyst should use the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool at: https://apps.fehrandpeers.com/SGVCOGVMT/. There are two VMT Metrics for
each Land Use Type built into the tool as shown in the figure below:
Either one of these two options may be used to screen a project. To use the tool for a proposed
project, the land use type must be either an existing or future land use within the Tier 1 Traffic
Analysis Zone (TAZ) for Total VMT per Service Population, or within the Tier 2 TAZ for Home-based VMT per capita or Home-based Work VMT per employee. Additionally, if using the Total VMT per
Service Population metric, the analyst must verify that the project is consistent with the existing
land use (i.e. if the project is proposing housing, there should be existing housing within that TAZ) and use professional judgment that there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise
misrepresent utilizing the data from the VMT Tool.
Step 3: Project Type Screening
Some project types have been identified as having the presumption of a less than significant impact.
The following uses can be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial
evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature:
• Local serving retail (retail establishments less than 50,000 square feet in size), including:
o Gas stations
o Gas Stations
o Banks
o Restaurants
o Shopping Center
• Local-serving K-12 schools
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
15
• Local parks
• Day care centers
• Local-serving hotels (e.g. non-destination hotels)
• Student housing projects on or adjacent to a college campus
• Local-serving assembly uses (places of worship, community organizations)
• Community institutions (public libraries, fire stations, local government)
• Affordable, supportive, or transitional housing
• Assisted living facilities
• Senior housing (as defined by HUD)
• Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the RTP/SCS (Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy)
• Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips2,3This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials:
o 11 single family housing units
o 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units
o 10,000 sq. ft. of office
o 15,000 sq. ft. of light industrial4
o 63,000 sq. ft. of warehousing3
o 79,000 sq. ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse3
• Public parking garages and public parking lots
Local serving retail projects with a total square footage less than 50,000 square feet may be
presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local
serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of
reducing vehicle travel. Any project that uses the designation of “local-serving” should be able to
demonstrate that its users (employees, customers, visitors) would be existing within the community. The project would not generate new “demand” for the project land uses but would meet the existing
2 Note that a redevelopment project replacing an existing use would estimate the net increase in trips above trips what already exists.
3 This threshold ties directly to the OPR technical advisory and notes that CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).) Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract an additional 110-124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact.
4 This number was estimated using rates from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual. Some industrial and warehousing tenants may generate traffic differently than what is documented in ITE. In these cases, documentation of the project generating less than 110 daily trips will be required for review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
16
demand that would shorten the distance existing residents, employees, customers, or visitors would
need to travel.
VMT Assessment for Non-Screened Development
Projects not screened through the steps above should complete VMT analysis and forecasting through the SCAG model, appropriate sub-area model, or VMT analysis tool to determine if they
have a significant VMT impact. This analysis should include ‘project generated VMT’ for the project
TAZ (or TAZs) and ‘project effect on VMT’ estimates under the scenarios below. Project generated VMT shall include the VMT generated by the site compared back to the CEQA threshold of
significance. The project effect on VMT is the link based VMT for a geographic region which is more
appropriate to review to evaluate how these developments change travel behavior in the region.
• Baseline conditions:
This data is available from the SCAG model or appropriate sub-area model approved by the City Staff. This data is also available in the SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool. Baseline
conditions typically represent the year of the Notice of Preparation (NOP). Interpolation
between the base and future year model will be required to identify the VMT representative of the baseline year.
• Baseline plus Project:
The project land use would be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created
to contain the project land uses. A full base year model run would be performed and VMT changes would be isolated for the project TAZ and across the full model network. The
model output must include reasonableness checks of the production and attraction
balancing to ensure the project effect is accurately captured. These reasonableness checks are subject to City Staff’s review. If this scenario results in a less-than-significant impact,
then additional cumulative scenario analysis may not be required (more information about
this outcome can be found in the Thresholds Evaluation discussion later in this chapter). The SGVCOG VMT assessment tool provides an estimate of the Baseline plus project
conditions. This data could be presented in lieu of results from the full model run. However,
it is recommended that a base year plus project run be performed as a check for reasonableness and consistency with the cumulative year results.
• Cumulative no Project:
This data is available from the SCAG model or appropriate sub-area model approved by
the City Staff.
• Cumulative plus project:
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
17
The project land use would either be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be
created to contain the project land uses. The addition of project land uses should be
accompanied by a reallocation of a similar amount of land use from other TAZs; especially if the proposed project is significant in size such that it would change other future
developments. Land use projects are often represented in the assumed growth of the
cumulative year population and employment. It may be appropriate to remove land use growth that represents a project from the cumulative year model to represent the
cumulative no project scenario If project land uses are simply added to the cumulative no project scenario, then the analysis should reflect this limitation in the methodology and
acknowledge that the analysis may overestimate the project’s effect on VMT.
The model output should include total VMT, which includes all vehicle trips and trip purposes, and VMT per service population. Total VMT (by speed bin) is needed as an input for air quality,
greenhouse gas (GHG), and energy impact analysis while total VMT per service population is
recommended for transportation impact analysis5.
The baseline and cumulative “plus project” scenarios noted above will summarize project generated
VMT per service population and comparing it back to the appropriate benchmark noted in the thresholds of significance. The cumulative “plus project” scenario noted above will summarize the
project effect on VMT, comparing how the project changes VMT on the network looking at citywide
VMT per service population comparing it to the no project condition.
Project-generated VMT should be extracted from the travel demand forecasting model using the
origin-destination trip matrix and should multiply that matrix by the final assignment skims. The
project-effect on VMT should be estimated using the City boundary6 and extracting the total link-
level VMT for both the no project and with project condition. The TAZ identification numbers within
the study area shall be included in the report.
In some cases, it may be appropriate to extract the Project-generated VMT using the production-attraction trip matrix. This may be appropriate when a project is entirely composed of retail or office
uses, and there is a need to isolate the home-based-work (HBW) VMT for the purposes of isolating commute VMT. The City should evaluate the appropriate methodology based on the project land
use types and context.
A detailed description of this process is attached to these guidelines. See Attachment C, “Detailed VMT Forecasting Information”.
5 The City has selected VMT per service population for its impact threshold. However, the City will allow for use of VMT to be isolated by trip purpose with review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
6 Note – for projects near the City boundary, a different boundary may be more applicable to make sure that VMT effects are not artificially truncated at the City boundary.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
18
CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds
VMT Impacts
VMT thresholds provided below are to be applied to determine potential project generated VMT impacts and project’s effect on VMT impacts.
A project would result in a significant project generated VMT impact if either of the
following conditions are satisfied4:
1. The baseline project generated VMT per service population exceeds the 15% below
the SGVCOG baseline VMT per service population, or
2. The cumulative project generated VMT per service population exceeds 15% below the SGVCOG baseline VMT per service population
The project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if it resulted in the following
condition being satisfied:
1. The cumulative link-level boundary Citywide VMT per service population increases
under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition.
Please note that the cumulative no project should reflect the adopted RTP/SCS; as such, if a project
is consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS, then the cumulative impacts (project effect on VMT) shall be
considered less than significant subject to consideration of other substantial evidence.
VMT Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation strategies are available to reduce VMT impacts:
1. Modify the project’s-built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the
project. 2. Implement transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce VMT
generated by the project.
3. Participate in a VMT fee program and/or VMT mitigation exchange/banking program (if available) to reduce VMT from the project or other land uses to achieve acceptable levels.
As part of the Implementation Study, key TDM measures that are appropriate to the region were
identified. Measures appropriate for most of the City are summarized in a table attached to these guidelines. See Attachment D, “VMT Mitigation Strategies”.
VMT reductions should be evaluated as part of the VMT impact analysis using state-of-the-practice
methodologies recognizing that many of the TDM strategies are dependent on building tenant
performance over time. As such, actual VMT reduction cannot be reliably predicted and monitoring
may be necessary to gauge performance related to mitigation expectations.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
19
When a Project is found to have a significant impact under CEQA, the City requires developers and
the business community to assist in reducing peak hour and total vehicular trips by implementing
Transportation Demand Management Plans (TDMs). The potential of a proposed project to reduce VMT through the use of a TDM plan should be addressed in the traffic study.
If a TDM plan is proposed as a mitigation measure for a project, and the traffic study attributes a
reduction in peak and total traffic to the TDM plan, the following information must be provided:
1. A detailed description of the major components of the TDM plan and how it would be implemented and maintained on a continuing basis.
2. Case studies or empirical data that supports the anticipated reduction of traffic attributed to the TDM plan.
3. Additional Volume/Capacity ratio calculations that illustrate the circulation benefits of the TDM plan.
4. Enforcement Measures – how it will be monitored and enforced.
5. How it complies with the South Coast Air Quality Management District Regulations.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
20
CEQA Assessment - Active
Transportation and Public Transit
Analysis
Potential impacts to public transit, pedestrian facilities and travel, and bicycle facilities and travel
can be evaluated using the following criteria:
• A significant impact occurs if the project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decreases the
performance or safety of such facilities.
Therefore, the TIA should evaluate whether a project is consistent with adopted policies, plans, or
programs regarding active transportation or public transit facilities, or otherwise increases or decreases the performance or safety of such facilities and make a determination as to whether it
has the potential to conflict with existing or proposed facilities supporting these travel modes.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
21
Transportation Impact Study Format
Each TIA submitted to the City should contain each of the following elements unless the topic is
not applicable. However, items omitted there as “not applicable” must first be approved by the City.
1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction
3. Project Description and Location
4. Methodology and Thresholds 5. LOS Analysis
6. On-site Parking, Access, and Circulation Analysis
7. Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis 8. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
9. Appendix
1. Executive Summary
This portion of the report shall present factual and concise information relative to the major issues identified in the report. The Executive Summary shall include a brief overview of the project, a short
discussion of the project’s traffic generation potential, the expected VMT impacts of the project,
and a summary of mitigation measures. It should also summarize any deficiencies in roadway LOS and the corresponding proposed improvements.
2. Introduction
The introduction of the report shall include a detailed description of study procedures, a general overview of the proposed project site and study area boundaries, existing and proposed site uses,
and existing and proposed roadways and intersections within the defined study area (defined study
area to be determined by the City). Exhibits required for this section shall include a regional map
showing the project vicinity and a site layout map.
3. Project Description and Location
This section shall expand on information presented in the introduction and shall provide a detailed
development scenario and specific project location. Exhibits in this section shall include, at a
minimum, a clear illustration of the project in terms of a site plan, its density, adjacent roadways, on-site parking supply, proposed traffic circulation within the project, gross square footage, number
of rooms/units, and other descriptors as appropriate.
4. Methodology and Thresholds
Identify the methodology used to calculate LOS and VMT. Include the criteria used for screening
projects from project-level VMT analysis, if applicable. Identify the impact threshold for VMT, and
the City’s LOS standards for roadways and intersections.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
22
5. LOS Analysis
This should include the Traffic Generation Forecast, Traffic Distribution and Assignment, Traffic
Analysis, and identify required improvements described about in “Level of Service Analysis Procedure”.
6. On-site Parking, Access, and Circulation Analysis
Refer to On-Site Parking Analysis section and Access and Circulation Analysis section.
7. Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis
Refer to Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis section.
8. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Present the Project VMT per service population for all analysis scenarios and the Project effect on
VMT for all analysis scenarios. Data should be presented in tabular format. If the project meets the City’s VMT screening criteria, this should be documented. All VMT impacts should be identified in
accordance with the VMT Impact Thresholds described above. Proposed VMT mitigation measures
should be identified.
9. Appendix
Detailed appendix material shall be supplied as part of the report. If the main report is too large to
include an appendix, such material shall be provided under a separate and identifiable cover. Typical
material in this regard includes VMT and TDM calculations, traffic counts, LOS calculation sheets,
fully completed signal warrants, accident diagrams at high accident locations, sketches of proposed roadway improvements, and other information necessary for the City's review of the report.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
23
Attachments
Attachment A: VMT Analysis Flowchart
Step 1
Screening
ProjectQuestions ProceduralFlowchart
Step 3
Developing
Mitigation
Measures
Step 2
VMT
Assessment
1. Is the project in a Transit Priority Area?
2. Are the following requirements met?
• Must have a total FAR greater than or equal to 0.75
• Cannot provide more parking than the City Municipal
Code Requirement
• Must be consistent with SCAG RTP/SCS
• Cannot replace affordable units with a smaller
number of moderate- or high-income residential units
What is the project-level VMT and its effect on VMT assessment?
Does the project have a less than significant impact?
CAPCOA = California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
FAR = Floor Area Ratio
PA = Production-Attraction
RTP = Regional Transportation Plan
SCAG = Southern California Association of Governments
SCS = Sustainable Communities Strategy
SGVCOG = San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
TDM = Transportation Demand Management
TPA = Transit Priority Area
VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled
What are the options to mitigate VMT impacts?
Abbreviations
1. Is the project located in a low VMT area?
2. Are the following requirements met?
• The project is composed of similar land use types and
of a similar density to the land uses within the project TAZ
• The project is assumed to generate VMT per person
similar to those existing uses
Steps
Is the project a local-serving project as noted in the Project Type
Screening project list in the Transportation Study Guidelines?
These projects include but are not limited to:
• Local serving K-12 schools
• Local-serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet
• Community and Religious Assembly Uses
• Public Services
• Affordable or supportive housing
• Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips
• Other projects as approved by the City Traffic Engineer
Type A
TPA Screening
Type B
Low VMT Area
Screening
Type C
Project Type
Screening
Note: Review jurisdiction's thresholds of
significance for definition of low VMT area.
Note: VMT reductions associated with proposed TDM mitigation
measures can be estimated with:
• CAPCOA reduction equations
• Use of OCTAM and the PA Methodology to isolate commute VMT
• The SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool TDM module can be utilized to
estimate VMT reduction potential associated with TDM measures
*Please note that a Mitigation Bank or Mitigation Exchange program
may not be readily available. Check with your local agency.
Details for VMT Assessment are provided in Transportation Study Guidelines.
Modify the project’s
built environment
characteristics to
reduce VMT generated
by the project
Implement TDM
measures to reduce VMT
generated by the project
Participate in
Mitigation Bank or
Mitigation Exchange
to offset impact*MITIGATIONTDMPROJECT
Note: If the project
fulfills Type A, B or C
screening, the project is
presumed to result in a
less-than-significant
transportation impact.
Note: If the project is
not screened from
assessment in Step 1, the
project will require a full
VMT assessment to
disclose potential
significant impacts.
Use SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool
Use latest version of the SCAG
model or local subregional model to
conduct VMT Assessment consistent
with Procedural Notes on VMT
Assessment on next page
Process Complete
Process Complete
Process Complete
Use SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool
Decision Analytical process or procedural outcome
SGVCOG VMT Assessment Flowchart
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
Process Complete
NOYES
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
24
Attachment B: SGVCOG VMT Assessment Tool User
Guide
1
SGVCOG VMT Tool:
Quick Start Guide
(August 18, 2020)
Led by the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) at the direction of 27 of the 30
member cities that constitute SGVCOG, this tool is an outcome of the VMT implementation process
whereby the participating cities adopted new significance thresholds for analyzing transportation
impacts pursuant to Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). The tool covers the following SGVCOG cities:
Alhambra Industry Rosemead
Arcadia Irwindale San Dimas
Azusa La Canada Flintridge San Gabriel
Baldwin Park La Puente San Marino
Claremont Laverne Sierra Madre
Covina Monterey Park South El Monte
Diamond Bar Montebello Temple City
Duarte Monrovia Walnut
El Monte Pomona West Covina
The tool can be accessed at https://apps.fehrandpeers.com/SGVCOGVMT/. Each of the cities has
unique thresholds of significance, and the methodologies for VMT screening may vary slightly due to
the different development patterns and geographic location of each community. Please coordinate
with the respective city when using this tool for development purposes.
WHAT DOES THIS TOOL DO?
The SGVCOG VMT Tool is designed to assist you in screening and estimating project‐generated VMT for
certain types of land use projects in the San Gabriel Valley and calculating VMT reductions associated
with certain VMT‐reducing measures. The tool is intended for use on four primary land uses:
Residential
Office
Industrial
Commercial (e.g. retail, restaurant, and entertainment uses)
The tool evaluates projects with one or a combination of these uses.
LIMITATIONS OF THE VMT EVALUATION TOOL
The VMT Evaluation Tool only covers some of the possible screening criteria that a city or county may
establish for land use project VMT analysis per California Senate Bill 743. The Tool is limited to providing
estimates based on data provided in the model, whereby if a proposed project is of a land use type that
is not reflected in the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) either now or in the future, the Tool is not capable of
estimating the VMT efficiency rate for that land use type. Other land uses types, large, complex and/or
2
mixed‐use projects, or long‐range land use plans should be analyzed using the Boundary Method, which
requires running the SCAG RTP Model. Before making any decisions based on the information provided
by the VMT Evaluation Tool, it is recommended that you contact the city in which the proposed
development is located.
RUNNING THE VMT EVALUATION TOOL – 4 BASIC STEPS
The following are the four basic steps involved in running the VMT Evaluation Tool:
Page 1: Select Project Area
Step 1: Jurisdiction
Using the drop‐down box, select the city where the project is located. This is required.
Step 2: Select Parcel(s)
There are three ways to locate the parcels associated with a proposed project:
1. Type in the Assessor Parcel Number(s) (APN). The APN requires a dash between each
grouping of numbers (XXXX‐XXX‐XXX).
2. Type in the Project Address; or,
3. Zoom into the map
To select the parcel, click on “Add”.
Page 2: Determine Screening Inputs
Project Information
o Project Name: Must type in a project name (required field) – max 250 characters
o Project Description: Required field – max 250 characters
o APNs: Auto‐populated from Page 1
3
Select Base Data: Auto‐populated
Analysis Methodology: Auto‐
populated
Select Baseline Year: The tool has
the capability of providing baseline
VMT between 2012 and 2040
pursuant to the 2016 SCAG RTP
Model. To select a baseline year,
click on the timeline and slide the
point to the preferred baseline year.
VMT Metric Specification for Land
Use 1‐3: The tool is capable of
evaluating up to three land use types
per project. The tool is also capable
of evaluating the difference in VMT
Metrics for one land use type. For
the latter, select the same land use
type for Land Use 1 and Land Use 2
and select different VMT Metrics.
Land Use Type: Select 1) Residential, 2) Office, 3) Industrial, or 4) Commercial.
VMT Metric: Select Home‐based VMT per Capita/Home‐based VMT per Worker or Total VMT per
Service Population
Jurisdictional Average for Baseline: Pre‐set (based on City preferences)
Threshold: Pre‐set (based on City preferences)
Project Screening Only versus Continue to VMT Reduction Factors: Option to screen first without
VMT reductions. The tool provides a mechanism to return to this page and select reductions.
4
Page 4: Project Screening Results (without VMT Reduction Strategies)
Page 4 (VMT Screening Results): From this page with Project Screening Results, there is an option at the top
left of the page to “Edit Inputs”. Click this to return to Page 3.
Page 3: Click on Continue to VMT Reduction Strategies to test VMT reduction strategies. Details about the
VMT Reduction Strategies are provided in Appendix D of the Transportation Assessment Guidelines.
Page 4 (Land Use Info and VMT Reduction Strategies): On this page, populate the project details. Note that
the light blue “i" in a circle can be clicked on for additional information, as demonstrated below.
Project Land Use Information
o The left‐hand entry boxes contain up/down arrows for increasing/decreasing values, but by
clicking to the left of the up/down
arrows, you may also type in a value, as
shown below. Please note that all
square‐footage values are calculated in
5
the tool in terms of one thousand square feet (KSF) so for a 6,000 square‐foot office, the field
would be populated with a “6”, as shown below.
VMT Reduction Strategies
o Select the desired VMT Reduction Strategies by first clicking the box next to the strategy. In
some cases, additional inputs will be required, such as the example below for Tier 3 Parking
(PK01 Limit Parking Supply)
A number of reduction strategies overlap with each other. For instance, a strategy may consist of a
basket of measures which may overlap with some of the measures in another strategy. Therefore, the
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool logic has been coded to reflect these dependencies, so that if one
measure is chosen, other overlapping measures are not allowed. The dependencies in the tool are
summarized below and are shown in the Tool by greying out certain reductions so that they cannot be
selected.
6
If this strategy is chosen… This strategy is not allowed…
PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education
TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 15 Travel behavior Change
TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
TP 05 Implement CTR Program
PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities
TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education
TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules
TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
TP 15 Behavioral Intervention
TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out TP 10 Price Workplace Parking
TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits
TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work
Schedules TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
TP 10 Price Workplace Parking TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out
TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program
TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet
TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
TP 15 Behavioral Intervention
TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education
TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet
TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change
Program
TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education
TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 15 Behavioral Intervention
Project Screening Results (with VMT Reduction Strategies): The results of the Project Screening are
summarized in this report. The Tool does not screen based on 110‐daily trips. Screening for this
factor must be completed outside of the tool using the ITE Trip Generation Manual. This Tool screens
projects based on their location within a TPA and/or a Low VMT Area. The Screening Results provides
the following information about these two screening criteria.
7
1. Transit Priority Area (TPA): Page 1 of the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report
2. Low VMT Area: Page 2 of the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report provides details about the
VMT generation in the area of the proposed project. The table in the figure below indicates
the Home‐based VMT per Employee Baseline (20.4), and the dark blue line indicated in the
bar chart (17.34) indicates the threshold of 15 percent below the Baseline. The gray dotted
line in the bar chart indicates the maximum potential VMT reduction (16.22) that could be
available through the strategies in the tool.
READING THE REPORT & EXPORT FILES
The VMT Evaluation Tool produces two types of outputs: a formatted report, which shows up on the
Results screen and can be downloaded as a PDF file, and data tables including all the user‐provided
inputs and the back‐end data which can be downloaded as CSV files.
Key things to look for in the report / PDF:
Whether the project falls in proximity to transit (within ½
mile of a Major Transit Stop, or ½ mile of a stop along a High‐
Quality Transit Corridor as defined in state law):
Look for the ‘Inside TPA?’ question on Page 1 of the report.
8
Whether the project falls in a low‐VMT area (i.e., below the VMT threshold specified by the
city/town/county): Look for the ‘Low VMT Screening Analysis’ row on the Screening Results page(s) of
the report, starting on page 2. There will be Low‐VMT Screening results for each land use you select.
The CSV files are intended to help the user understand how the VMT reduction results were obtained; the
data in the files, along with the formulas in forthcoming User Manual, should help confirm the results.
TIPS FOR SUCCESS
Look for the “tool‐tips” across the tool to help understand fields where inputs are required.
The tool may take 1 ‐ 2 minutes to run a report; if it takes much longer, refresh and try again.
If you are running variations on the same site and project, use the back arrows in the upper‐left of
the screen (such as ) to go back, vary some inputs, and run the report again.
To start a completely new analysis while staying in the tool, use the button in the upper‐right of the
Results screen.
The tool is optimized for Chrome, Firefox, Edge or Safari on a Windows or Mac computer, although
you may also access it from a tablet or another browser. If you encounter unexpected issues, try
clearing your browser cache and cookies and running again.
Please fill out the short feedback form by clicking on the link in the upper‐right
of the tool. You may report errors, rate the tool, and offer suggestions for future improvements.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
SGVCOG will be providing further documentation of the VMT Evaluation Tool in Fall 2020, including a
User Manual and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) sheet.
If you have questions about the VMT Evaluation Tool, you may email j.hayes@fehrandpeers.com.
For any inquiries about how the tool may be applied in a land use review and approval process, please
contact staff at the city/town/county in which the project is located.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
25
Attachment C: Detailed VMT Forecasting Information
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
26
This section provides detailed VMT forecasting instructions for use with the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) Travel Demand Model. Please note that SCAG periodically
updates the travel demand model and the latest version available should be utilized for VMT assessment in the City.
The SCAGT travel demand model is a trip-based model that generates daily person trip-ends for
each traffic analysis zone (TAZ or zone) across various trip purposes (Home-based-work, home-
based-other, and non-home-based for example) based on population, household, and employment
variables. This may create challenges for complying with the VMT guidance because trip generation is not directly tied to specific land use categories. The following methodology addresses this
particular challenge among others.
Production and attraction trip-ends are separately calculated for each zone, and generally: production trip-ends are generated by residential land uses and attraction trip-ends are generated
by non-residential land uses. Focusing on residential and employment land uses, the first step to
forecasting VMT requires translating the land use into model terms, the closest approximations are:
• Residential: home-based production trips
• Employment: home-based work attraction trips
Note that this excludes all non-home-based trips.
The challenges with computing VMT for these two types of trips in a trip-based model are 1)
production and attraction trip-ends are not distinguishable after the productions/attractions (PA)
to origins/destinations (OD) conversion process and 2) trip purposes are not maintained after the mode choice step. For these reasons, it not possible to use the VMT results from the standard
vehicle assignment (even using a select zone re-assignment). A separate post-process must be
developed to re-estimate VMT for each zone that includes trip-end types and trip purposes. In order to provide the most accurate estimates possible, the recommended approach to estimating
VMT is outlined below. Deviating from this approach will require justification and approval from
the City Staff.
VMT Forecasting Instructions
This approach will calculate total Origin/Destination (OD) VMT using standard SCAG model output
files. The OD method for calculating total VMT includes all vehicle trips that start in a specific traffic analysis zone, and all vehicle trips that end in a specific traffic analysis zone. The major steps of this
approach are listed as follows:
• Re-skim final loaded congested networks and adjust the external skim for each mode and
time period to account for truncated trips
• Multiply appropriate distance skim matrices by OD trip matrices to estimate VMT by time
period
• Sum matrices by time period and mode to calculate daily automobile VMT
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
27
• Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs
Appropriateness Checks
The number of vehicle trips from the total VMT estimation should match as closely as possible with
the results from the traditional model process. The estimated results should be checked against the results from a full model run to understand the degree of accuracy. Note that these custom
processes may or may not include full lengths of IX/XI trips (trips with origins or destinations outside
of the model roadway network) or special generator trips (airport, seaport, stadium, etc.).
When calculating VMT for comparison at the study area, citywide, or regional geography, the same
methodology that was used to estimate project specific VMT should be used. The VMT for these
comparisons can be easily calculated by aggregating the row or column totals for all zones that are
within the desired geography.
City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines October 2020
28
Attachment D: VMT Mitigation Strategies
101 Pacifica | Suite 300 | Irvine, CA 92618 | (949) 308-6300 www.fehrandpeers.com
1. SGVCOG VMT Reduction Calculations
This section describes the SCGCOG VMT Evaluation Tool’s approach to calculating the
effectiveness of VMT reduction strategies that are built into the tool. While a long list of potential
VMT reduction measures are made available to users, care must be taken by the analyst to
understand and carefully consider the research supporting each VMT reduction measure to
determine the efficacy of the potential VMT mitigation.
1.1 Neighborhood Place Types
Based on empirical research that used quantitative methods to classify the census tracts of
California into neighborhood place types, a place type is assigned to each parcel in the SGVCOG.1
These place types, described in Table 1, categorize the neighborhood surrounding specific
parcels in terms of density, general accessibility and access to transit, and land use. These factors
have been shown to have a substantial effect on a location’s ability to support low-VMT travel. To
reflect this, the place types are used to identify maximum potential VMT reductions for projects,
based on research studies. Where supported by research, the neighborhood place types are also
used to identify the effectiveness of specific VMT reduction strategies.
Table 1. Neighborhood Place Types
Neighborhood Place Types Description
Central City Urban Very high density, excellent accessibility, high public transit access, low single-family homes, older high-value housing stock
Urban High Transit Use High density, good accessibility, high public transit access, low single-family homes, middle-aged and older housing stock
Urban Low Transit Use Good accessibility, low vacancy, middle-aged housing stock
Suburb with Multifamily Housing Average on most indicators, low single-family homes, and relatively lower housing values
Suburb with Single-Family Homes Low density and accessibility, low vacancy, high newer single-family homes, and relatively higher housing values
Rural in Urbanized Area Slightly better accessibility than the truly “rural” tracts, more likely to have multifamily housing
Rural Very low access, high vacancy, high newer single-family homes with lower housing values (mainly outside population centers of any kind)
Notes: Neighborhood place type coding used in script: 1) Urban Low Transit Use, 2) Suburb with Multifamily Housing, 3) Central City Urban, 4) Rural, 5) Suburb with Single Family Homes, 6) Urban High Transit Use, and 7) Rural in Urbanized Area.
1 Neighborhood types from Salon, Deborah. February 2014. Quantifying the effect of local government actions on VMT. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency.
August 27, 2020 Page 2 of 32
1.2 VMT Reduction Strategies
Each strategy for the four different VMT mitigation categories is supported by evidence from a
previous literature review prepared by Fehr & Peers, and from our work in VMT reduction
strategies. This documentation also includes rural in Urbanized Area and Rural neighborhood
place types.2 The mitigation categories (or tiers) are:
• Tier 1: Project Characteristics • Tier 2: Multimodal Infrastructure • Tier 3: Parking • Tier 4: Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Programs
Strategies and their corresponding evidence and calculations in the tool are described below.
(Shortened versions of these descriptions are presented in the tooltips (information buttons)
within the tool itself.) Matrices of reductions and elasticities are provided below for each of the
four strategy categories (Table 2 to Table 5). Strategy names are listed in the order in which they
appear in the tool.
1.2.1 Standards of Evidence
While a long list of potential VMT reduction measures are made available to users of the SGVCOG
VMT Evaluation Tool, care must be taken by the analyst to understand what VMT reduction
strategies may have already been captured in the SCAG travel model to avoid double counting.
Furthermore, the analyst should carefully consider the research supporting each VMT reduction
measure to determine the efficacy of the potential VMT mitigation. For example, the analyst may
consider whether the supporting studies were based on a statistical model (such as a regression
analysis, logit model, etc.) or another type of study, such as a synthesis of available research or a
model that provides inferential support for a VMT reduction. The analyst may also look at the
geographic location(s) and setting(s) covered in the study or studies that support a
VMT reduction.
1.2.2 Tier 1: Project Characteristics
This category is composed of strategies that change land use characteristics, such as density, mix
of uses, and housing affordability. These strategies reduce VMT by increasing access to amenities
or by attracting residents who generate lower VMT than the average household. Reductions and
elasticities for the four strategies are in Table 2.
2 These neighborhood place types were added for completeness and allows reductions similar to suburban with single family neighborhood place type to provide flexibility in testing VMT reductions in rural settings. Many VMT reduction measures are not as effective in rural settings and the analyst should consider available research and supplement that research with local data on VMT reductions in rural settings when evaluating VMT reductions in a rural setting.
August 27, 2020 Page 3 of 32
1.2.2.1 PC 01 Increase Residential Density
Increased residential density, measured in dwelling units per existing residential acreage in a
given area, affects the distances people travel and provides greater options for the mode of travel
they choose. This measure provides a foundation for implementing other measures that would
benefit from increased densities. This strategy applies to residential land uses only.
This study used a large sample of data from Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco
metropolitan areas to model the relationship between the VMT and urban design variables.3 The
study found that households per residential acre (Hh/RA) provided the greatest explanatory
power for VMT variation across an area. VMT per household is estimated as a function of the ratio
of households to residential acreage in the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) or the half-mile buffer
around a parcel under the existing condition and under the with project condition. The VMT
reduction is based on the estimated change in calculated VMT per household without the project
and with the project.
% 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=�𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻ℎ 𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟−𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻ℎ𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟�𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻ℎ𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
The study’s VMT per household equation for the Los Angeles metropolitan area is shown below.
Data from the Los Angeles metropolitan area was incorporated into the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation
Tool as shown below.
𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻ℎ=19749(4.814 +𝐻𝐻ℎ𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅4.814 +7.140)−0.639
1.2.2.2 PC 02 Increase Development Diversity (and PC 05)
Increasing the amount of space dedicated to a less common or nonexistent use in the area
surrounding the land use development project leads to a reduction in VMT. Having different types
of land uses near one another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter
and may be accommodated by non-auto modes of transport. For example, when residential areas
are in the same neighborhood as retail and office buildings, residents do not need to travel
outside of the neighborhood to run errands and may be able to live and work in the same
neighborhood. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses.
The land use diversity of the TAZ or half-mile buffer around a parcel is measured using an activity
mix index. The activity mix index is a proportion of the number of people in the TAZ or parcel
buffer participating as residents or employees in retail, office, industrial and other jobs to the
number of possible land uses on the TAZ or parcel buffer. The activity mix index for the TAZ or
3 Holtzclaw, et al. 2002. “Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and Socioeconomic Characteristics Determine Auto Ownership and Use – Studies in Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.” Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 25, pp. 1–27.
August 27, 2020 Page 4 of 32
parcel buffer without the development is compared with the activity mix with the development to
estimate the VMT reduction accomplished by improving the mix of activities in the neighborhood.
The elasticities of per capita VMT and VMT per worker by neighborhood place type with respect
to the activity mix index are estimated based on the empirical research supporting the strategy.4
The study used multiple statistical modeling methods to estimate the effect of land use variables
on VMT by neighborhood place type, using data from travel surveys conducted between 2001
and 2009. PC 05 is the Employment portion of strategy PC 02, which is not shown explicitly in the
tool but is activated when the user selects strategy PC 02 for a project that includes employment
land uses.
𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀 𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀= �𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖× ln(𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖)ln (𝑁𝑁)𝑁𝑁
𝑖𝑖=1
𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖=𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 (𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟) 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑁𝑁=𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 % 𝐶𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎= 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× % ∆ 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀
1.2.2.3 PC 03 Affordable Housing
This strategy encourages building a greater percentage of affordable and below market rate
(BMR) housing to allow for lower income families to live at the project. Research has shown that
households with incomes at or below 80 percent of the regional median income make fewer trips
by automobile than households with higher incomes, resulting in lower per capita VMT in some
jurisdictions. BMR housing can also provide opportunities for lower income families to live closer
to job centers and to use transit for their commutes. This strategy applies to residential land
uses only.
This VMT reduction is based on a study that used data from the 2010-2012 California Household
Travel Survey (CHTS) to determine a relationship between VMT and low-income households. The
study reported the estimated VMT reductions of three lower income household groups when
compared to the VMT of median family income (MFI) households.5 The research that is available
is based on the behavior of lower incomes households but not on the behavior of lower income
households living in BMR housing. The reductions by income group are listed below. 𝐸𝐸𝑀𝑀𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝐴𝐴 𝐿𝐿𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤 𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 (𝐻𝐻𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 30% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀𝐼𝐼)= −32.5% 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝐿𝐿𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤 𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 (𝐻𝐻𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 30% 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 50% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀𝐼𝐼)= −25.2% 𝐿𝐿𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤 𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 (𝐻𝐻𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 50% 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 80% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑉𝑉𝑀𝑀𝐼𝐼)= −10.2%
4 Salon, Deborah. 2013. Quantifying the effect of local government actions on VMT. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. 5 Newmark, G. and Haas, P. 2015. Income, Location Efficiency, and VMT: Affordable Housing as a Climate Strategy. The California Housing Partnership.
August 27, 2020 Page 5 of 32
1.2.2.4 PC 04 Increase Employment Density
Like increasing residential density, increasing employment density affects the distances people
commute and provides greater options for the modes of travel they choose. Employment density
is measured as the ratio of the number of employees to the net commercial and industrial
acreage in a given area. Employment includes office, retail, industrial, and other employment. This
strategy applies to employment land uses only.
The study used to support this strategy reported VMT decreases in lower density locations, such
as suburban places, with an increase in employment density.6 The study is based on results from a
linear regression model of cross-sectional data collected from Austin’s Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization to determine the differences in VMT associated with employment density.
For suburban neighborhood place types (suburban with multifamily home and single-family
homes), a 0.03 percent reduction in VMT was observed for a 1 percent increase in employment
density. In higher-density locations (urban neighborhood place types), VMT was observed to
increase in response to employment density. This increase could be related to the replacement of
housing with employment uses in an already job-rich environment. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 (𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟)=−0.03 × % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴
6 Zhou, B. and K. M. Kockelman. 2008. Self-selection in home choice: use of treatment effects in evaluating relationship between built environment and travel behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2077(1): 54-61. Cited in Circella, Giovanni et al. 2014. Impacts of Employment Density on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Policy Brief and Technical Background Document). California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency.
August 27, 2020 Page 6 of 32
Table 2. Project Characteristics Strategy Elasticities and Reductions
Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
PC 01 Increase Residential Density Project Density (Dwelling Units)
% change in VMT / % change in household density See strategy methods for reduction.
PC 02 PC 05
Increase Development Diversity (Residential and Employment)
Land Use Types (Dwelling Units and 1,000 square feet)
% change in residential VMT / % change in the activity mix index % change in employment VMT / % change in the activity mix index
-0.191 -0.14
0 -0.144
0 0
-0.0325 -0.0329
0 0
0 0
0 0
PC 03 Affordable Housing BMR Units by income type VMT / capita Extremely Low Income (Household earns less than 30% of MFI) = -32.5% Very Low Income (Household earns between 30% and 50% of MFI) = -25.2% Low Income (Household earns between 50% and 80% of MFI) = -10.2%
PC 04 Increase Employment Density
Project Density (Jobs)
% change in VMT / % change in employment density 0.074 0.074 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03
Note: 1. Elasticities are expressed as a decimal less than 1 while reductions are expressed as a percentage or a constant.
August 27, 2020 Page 7 of 32
1.2.3 Tier 2: Multimodal Infrastructure
These strategies require project developers to provide funding for and/or construct
improvements to the surrounding transportation network that encourage the use of biking,
walking, and transit instead of driving. Reductions and elasticities for the five strategies are in
Table 3.
1.2.3.1 MI 01 Increase Bike Access
This strategy requires the project developer to provide funding for or construct bicycle facilities
that close gaps in the bicycle network and/or lower the level of traffic stress on the existing
bicycle network (e.g., construct a barrier or buffer for an existing bike lane). Improving bike access
to project sites encourages people to bike instead of drive, thus reducing VMT. This strategy only
applies to bicycle facilities that provide a dedicated lane for bicyclists or a completely separated
right-of-way for bicycles and pedestrians. This includes the construction of or improvements to
Class I (trail), Class II (bike lane), and Class IV (protected bike lane) bikeways. This measure would
not be applicable if the resulting gap between the project and the external bikeway exceeds 1/3
mile. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses,
The research supporting this reduction used a large sample of travel data within the city limits of
Montreal to investigate the link between bicycle infrastructure accessibility and cycling modal
share.7 The study reports a 3.71 percent increase in bicycle mode share for a 1 percent decrease in
distance to cycling infrastructure for the urban with low transit neighborhood place type. The
same study reports different elasticities for urban (central city urban and urban high transit) and
suburban (suburban multifamily housing and single-family homes) neighborhood place types.
These elasticities are shown in Table 3. % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=0.371 × % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
The shift from vehicle trips to bicycle trips is expected to occur for vehicle trips that are of
bikeable length. Thus, the actual VMT reduction is prorated by the ratio of the average bicycle trip
length to the average vehicle trip length. Average trip lengths are derived from California
Household Travel Survey (CHTS) data. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=(% 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)(𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)
7 Zahabi, S., Chang, A., Miranda-Moreno, L., and Patterson, Z. 2016. Exploring the link between the neighborhood typologies, bicycle infrastructure and commuting cycling over time and the potential impact on commuter GHG emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 47:89–103.
August 27, 2020 Page 8 of 32
1.2.3.2 MI 02 Improve Connectivity – Network Connectivity/Design Improvements
Building a new street connection and/or connecting cul-de-sacs to provide pedestrian and bicycle
access enhances walkability, connectivity, and street accessibility within a neighborhood. VMT
reductions are based on the change to intersection densities within a quarter mile buffer of the
project and on internal connections within the project site. Intersection density is a calculated as
the number of intersections per square mile within a quarter mile buffer around the project site.
The user can estimate existing intersection density manually or using Geographic Information
System (GIS) software. The strategy applies to residential and employment land uses.
The study synthesized the results of nine studies to determine the effect of intersection and street
density on VMT reductions.8 The study reports a -0.12 elasticity of VMT reduction with respect to
a one percent increase in intersection density. This reduction only applies to suburban
neighborhood place types, as the relative improvement to pedestrian accessibility is greater in
suburban areas than in urban areas that already have dense street networks. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟= −0.12 × % 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴
1.2.3.3 MI 03 Increase Transit Accessibility
Building the project within a proximity to a transit station or stop with high-quality service
enhances access to transit which facilities the use of transit for people traveling to/from the
project site. Facilitating transit use results in a mode shift from driving to transit and thereby
reduces VMT. In the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool, this strategy is applied by taking the distance
between the project site and the closest transit stop without project improvements and the
distance to the closest transit stop with project improvements and applying an elasticity factor;
therefore, the project can reduce its VMT by relocating a transit stop closer to the site. Proposed
changes to transit stop locations should be negotiated with the Lead Agency and the applicable
transit operator. The strategy applies to residential and employment land uses.
The study supporting this strategy provides results on the effect of urban form, including distance
to transit, on VMT through modeling data from the 1990 National Personal Transportation Survey
data.9 The associated reduction in VMT with the reduction in distance to transit (elasticity) is
reported as -0.08. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟= −0.08 × % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝
8 Ewing, R., and Cervero, R. 2010. Travel and the Built Environment - A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association. 9 Bento, A.M., Cropper, M.L., Mobarak, A.M., and Vinha, K. 2003. The Impact of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in The United States. World Bank policy research working paper, 3007.
August 27, 2020 Page 9 of 32
1.2.3.4 MI 04 Traffic Calming
This strategy requires the project design to include pedestrian/bicycle safety and traffic calming
measures both on-site and in the surrounding neighborhood. Providing traffic calming measures
encourages people to walk or bike instead of using a vehicle, resulting in decreased VMT. VMT
reductions are based on whether the project will be providing at a minimum median refuges,
bulb-outs, and/or other pedestrian crossing enhancements beyond the frontage of the
development. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses.
The study supporting this strategy quantified the effects of traffic calming on VMT by comparing
the change in VMT in suburban and urban neighborhood place types with same pedestrian
environment conditions with and without traffic calming improvements.9 The study found that
traffic calming improvements yield higher VMT reductions in suburban places than in urban
places, as the relative reduction in traffic speeds is greater in suburban areas than in urban areas
where traffic already tends to move slowly. If the project provides traffic calming improvements
beyond the project site frontage, the reduction from the evidence is applied based on the
neighborhood place type of the project site. These reductions are shown in Table 3. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟= 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟
1.2.3.5 MI 05 Pedestrian Networks
This strategy requires the project design to include pedestrian improvements both on-site and in
the surrounding neighborhood. Providing a pedestrian accessible network encourages people to
walk instead of drive, thereby reducing VMT. The pedestrian improvements include but are not
limited to buffered sidewalks on both sides of the street, marked or signalized pedestrian
crossings at intersections (enhanced crosswalks), lighting, and curb ramps. This strategy applies to
both residential and employment land uses.
The study supporting this strategy quantified the effects of the pedestrian environment on VMT
by comparing the change in VMT in suburban and urban neighborhood place types with same
pedestrian environment conditions with and without pedestrian improvements.10 The study found
that pedestrian improvements yield higher VMT reductions in suburban places than in urban
places, since suburban places tend to have less developed pedestrian networks to begin with. If
the project provides pedestrian network improvements beyond the project site frontage, the
reduction is then applied based on neighborhood place type of the project site. These reductions
are shown in Table 3. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟= 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟
10 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute.
August 27, 2020 Page 10 of 32
Table 3. Multimodal Infrastructure Strategy Elasticities and Reductions
Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
MI 01 Bike Access Improvements
Distance to nearest existing bicycle facility
% change in bicycle mode share / % decrease in distance to cycling infrastructure
-0.371 -0.371 -0.371 -0.371 -0.371 -0.371 -0.371
MI 02
Improve Connectivity (Network Connectivity/ Design Improvements)
Intersection Density
% change in VMT / % change in intersection density -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12
MI 03 Increase Transit Accessibility
Distance to closest transit stop
% change in VMT / % reduction in distance to transit -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08
MI 04 Traffic Calming Measures Binary Answer VMT / capita VMT/worker -0.6% -0.6% -2% -2% -2% -2% -2%
MI 05 Pedestrian Networks Binary Answer VMT / capita VMT/worker -0.6% -0.6% -2% -2% -2% -2% -2%
Note: 1. Elasticities are expressed as a decimal less than 1 while reductions are expressed as a percentage or a constant.
August 27, 2020 Page 11 of 32
1.2.4 Tier 3: Parking
Strategies in this category reduce automobile parking supply, making driving less attractive, and
provide high-quality bicycle parking, making biking more attractive. Reductions and elasticities for
the two strategies are in Table 4.
1.2.4.1 PK 01 Limit Parking Supply
This strategy would require the development to decrease parking supply at the project site to
rates lower than those documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking
Generation manual or to those documented by the municipal code if that is what the jurisdiction
has chosen. Decreasing parking supply encourages employees to choose an alternative
transportation mode for their commutes. This measure only applies if street parking is not free or
unrestricted during typical working hours. Surrounding street parking must be metered, have time
limits during typical working hours, and/or be available to residential parking permit (RPP) holders
only. The strategy applies to employment land uses only.
VMT reductions for this strategy are based on the project's parking supply compared to the
minimum parking supply requirement from municipal or ITE code. The parking supply reduction is
limited to 25 percent from minimum required by municipal code. The strategy uses an equation
derived from the URBEMIS model parking mitigation component. The URBEMIS model is used to
calculate air quality impacts for development projects based on VMT reduction and other
emissions reduction approaches.11 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=% 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝐴𝐴 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐼𝐼𝑇𝑇𝐸𝐸 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 0.5
1.2.4.2 PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities
This strategy requires the project developer to provide and maintain facilities for bicycle users at
the project site. Providing end of trip facilities encourages people to bike instead of drive, thereby
reducing VMT. Examples of end of trip facilities include bike parking, bicycle lockers, showers, and
personal lockers. The extent of the VMT reduction is based on whether the project provides only
secure bike parking or secure bike parking and additional facilities. This strategy applies to
employment land uses only and overlaps with the TP 05 Commute Trip Reduction
Program strategy.
The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on evidence from a study that examined the effects
of bicycle infrastructure on the probability of cycling to work using a multivariable regression
analysis of 2010 travel survey data collected by the Metropolitan Washington Council of
11 Nelson\Nygaard. 2005. Crediting Low-Traffic Developments: Adjusting Site-Level Vehicle Trip Generation Using URBEMIS.
August 27, 2020 Page 12 of 32
Governments.12 From a final sample of 4,711 households, the study determined that employees
are 1.78 times more likely to commute by bicycle when secure bicycle parking is provided than
when it is not, and that employees are 4.86 times more likely to commute by bicycle when bicycle
parking and additional end of trip facilities are provided than when they are not. These odds
ratios are multiplied by the existing bicycle mode share of the TAZ or half-mile buffer around a
parcel to determine the new bicycle mode share for the TAZ or parcel buffer.
The shift from vehicle trips to bicycle trips is expected to occur for vehicle trips that are of
bikeable length. Thus, the actual VMT reduction is prorated by the ratio of the average bicycle trip
length to the average vehicle trip length. Average trip lengths are derived from California
Household Travel Survey (CHTS) data. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=(% 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)(𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)
12 Buehler, R. 2012. Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: The role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work. Transportation Research Part D, 17: 525-531.
August 27, 2020 Page 13 of 32
Table 4. Parking Strategy Elasticities and Reductions
Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
PK 01 Limit Parking Supply Total Employee Parking Spaces Maximum VMT / worker reduction -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% -12.5% -12.5%
PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities Binary Answer
bicycle commuters when bicycle parking is available / bicycle commuters when bicycle parking is not available bicycle commuters when bicycle end trip facilities are available / bicycle commuters when bicycle end trip facilities are not available
1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78
4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86
Note: 1. Elasticities are expressed as a decimal less than 1 while reductions are expressed as a percentage or a constant.
August 27, 2020 Page 14 of 32
1.2.5 Tier 4: TDM Programs
Included in this category are programmatic strategies that reduce VMT by providing alternatives
to driving alone, as well as incentives, such as ride sharing programs, transit subsidies, and shuttle
services. These strategies would be implemented on an ongoing basis once the project is
occupied. Reductions and elasticities for the 18 strategies are in Table 6.
1.2.5.1 TP 01 School Pool Programs
The strategy would require the organization of a program that matches families in carpools for
school pick-up and drop-off. The program would be open to all families in the development.
Organizing a School Pool Program helps match parents who transport students to schools
without a bussing program, including private schools, charter schools, and neighborhood schools
where students cannot walk or bike. School pools reduce the total number of vehicle trips
traveling to and from schools, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy is supported by evidence from
2012 California Household Travel Survey where 2.3% of the home-based VMT is generated by
home-based K-12 school trips. According to American Community Survey (ACS 2017), about
27.85% of the households have kids in K-12 school. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=8.25%× % 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.2 TP 02 Bike Sharing Programs
This strategy requires the project developer to dedicate space for or provide subsidies to a bike
sharing system, ideally one with high penetration in a larger area, such as Bay Wheels. Bike share
substitutes for some driving trips and provides a first/last-mile connection for transit users,
reducing auto trips and thereby reducing VMT. This reduction only applies if a bike share station
is eventually built on site. This strategy applies to residential and employment land uses.
This strategy is supported by a study that reported the effects of a pilot bicycle share system on
bicycle usage in London.13 Online surveys of existing customers were used to assess mode shifts
due to bike share use. The study reported that 6 percent of users shifted from driving to using
bike share for work or school trips.
The shift from vehicle trips to bicycle trips is expected to occur for vehicle trips that are of
bikeable length. Thus, the actual VMT reduction is prorated by the ratio of the average bicycle trip
length to the average vehicle trip length. Average trip lengths are derived from California
Household Travel Survey (CHTS) data.
13 Noland, R.B., and Ishaque, M.M. 2006. Smart bicycles in an urban area: Evaluation of a pilot scheme in London. J. Public Transportation. 9 (5), 71–95.
August 27, 2020 Page 15 of 32
% 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=(−6% 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)(𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇× 𝑎𝑎𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟)
1.2.5.3 TP 03 Car Sharing Programs
The strategy requires the project to provide subsidies and promotions, as well as dedicated
parking spaces, for car sharing services such as ZipCar, Car2Go, and/or GetAround. Supporting a
car sharing program allows people to have on-demand access to a shared fleet of vehicles. Car
sharing helps support the use of walking, biking, carpooling, and transit by providing access to
vehicles for occasional trips and a guaranteed ride home option, allowing for overall reductions in
auto use which results in reduced VMT. This strategy applies to residential and employment land
uses.
Evidence supporting this strategy is from a study that examined the impact of car sharing on
household VMT in the Bay Area.14 Travel diary surveys were collected from 527 members and 45
non-members at five points between 2001 and 2005. Members reported reducing their
household VMT by 32.8 percent. The expected participation rate of 2 percent is derived from
report by UCLA documenting commuting characteristics of faculty, staff, and students.15 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=32.8%× % 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 × % 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟/𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.4 TP 04 Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Marketing and Education
This strategy requires implementing a marketing campaign, targeting all project employees and
visitors, that encourages the use of transit, shared rides, and active modes and thereby reducing
VMT. Marketing strategies may include new employee orientation on alternative commute
options, event promotions, and publications. The strategy applies to employment land uses only.
This strategy overlaps with the TP 05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program and TP 18
Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program strategies.
The strategy is based on a study that synthesizes evidence from four studies on the link between
TDM strategies and travel behavior.16 The study documents 82 case studies of employer and
institutional TDM programs from different locations in the US. Programs that primarily offered
commute trip reduction marketing/education yielded an average 4 percent reduction of commute
vehicle trips. This strategy assumes a 1:1 ratio of vehicle trips to vehicle miles traveled. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=4% × 1(𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟)× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟
14 Cervero, R., Golub, A., and Nee, B. 2007. City CarShare: Longer-term travel demand and car ownership impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1992: 70-80. 15 UCLA Transportation. 2011 State of the Commute Report. 16 Transit Cooperative Research Program. 2010. TCRP 95 Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes – Chapter 19 Employer and Institutional TDM Strategies.
August 27, 2020 Page 16 of 32
1.2.5.5 TP 05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program
This strategy requires providing a comprehensive program to reduce the number of drive-alone
commute trips to the project and to actively monitor and react to changes in mode share. The
program includes encouraging and assisting employees to use an alternative commute mode.
Tools may include carpooling encouragement, ride share assistance, flexible/alternative work
schedules, vanpool assistance, bicycle end of trip facilities, and other measures. The strategy
applies to employment land uses only. This strategy overlaps with the PK02 Provide Bike Facilities,
TP04 Commute Trip Reduction Marketing and Education, TP08 Telecommuting and Alternative
Work Schedules, TP13 Ride-Sharing Programs, TP15 Behavioral Intervention, TP17 Vanpool
Incentives, and TP18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program strategies.
The strategy’s evidence is from research that used a multivariable model to estimate the effects of
TDM measures on VMT for various neighborhood place types.17 VMT reductions by
neighborhood place type are shown in Table 6. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.6 TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out
This strategy requires project employers to offer employee parking "cash-out,” which gives
employees the choice to forgo subsidized/free parking for a cash payment equivalent to the cost
that the employer would otherwise pay for the parking space. Providing an alternative to
subsidized/free parking encourages commuters to travel via walking, biking, carpooling, and
transit, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to employment land uses only and overlaps
with the TP10 Price Workplace Parking strategy.
The strategy is supported by a study that used a multivariable model to estimate the effects of
TDM measures, such as providing a parking “cash-out,” on VMT for various neighborhood place
types.18 The strategy is less effective in suburban and low transit neighborhood place types than
in urban and high transit neighborhood place types. The VMT reductions by neighborhood place
type are shown in Table 6. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝐴 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟
17 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute. 18 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute.
August 27, 2020 Page 17 of 32
1.2.5.7 TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program
This strategy requires project employers or building operators to provide either partially or fully
subsidized transit passes for all project affiliates (employees and/or residents). Providing subsidies
for transit use encourages people to use transit rather than driving, thereby reducing VMT.
The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on a study that synthesizes five studies documenting
the effects of transit service strategies on transit ridership.19 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=% 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟1 −% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 0.43 × % 𝑜𝑜𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴× % 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.8 TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules
This strategy requires project employers to allow and encourage employees to telecommute from
home when possible, or to shift work schedules such that travel occurs outside of peak
congestion periods. This strategy reduces commute trips, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy
applies to employment land uses only and overlaps with the TP05 Implement Commute Trip
Reduction Program strategy.
The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on a study that uses a multivariable model that
provides the effects of specific TDM measures on VMT.20 VMT reductions are quantified for
telecommuting 1.5 days a week, a 9/80 schedule, and a 4/40 schedule. The VMT reductions for
the different telecommuting and alternative work schedule approaches are shown in Table 6. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.9 TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet
This strategy requires project employers to provide direct shuttle service to the project site from
areas with high concentrations of employees. This strategy reduces drive-alone commute trips,
thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to employment land uses only and overlaps with the
TP13 Ride-Sharing Program and TP17 Vanpool Incentives strategies.
The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on a study from San Francisco Municipal
Transportation Agency (SFMTA).21 The commuter Shuttle Pilot Program Evaluation Report
reported that 47 percent of users would have driven if the shuttle were not available. The
evidence is used to estimate the shift from vehicle commuting to shuttle commuting, thereby
19 Handy, Susan et al. 2013. Impacts of Transit Service Strategies on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. 20 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute. 21 SFMTA. 2015. Commuter Shuttle Pilot Program Evaluation Report.
August 27, 2020 Page 18 of 32
reducing vehicle commute trips. Assuming a one-to-one adjustment factor for commuter trips to
commute miles the operating shuttle service could achieve about 47% reduction in
commute VMT. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=47%× % 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.10 TP 10 Price Workplace Parking
This strategy would require commuters to pay for parking on-site. This strategy provides a
disincentive to driving and encourages commuters to use other modes, thereby reducing VMT.
The strategy applies to employment land uses only and overlaps with the TP 06 Employee Parking
Cash-Out strategy.
The VMT reduction for this strategy is based on a study that used a multivariable model to
determine the effects of TDM measures on VMT, and on a synthesis of research documenting the
effects of annual vehicle costs on VMT.22,23 Pricing on-site workplace parking contributes to
annual vehicle operating costs, which reduces driving and thus reduces VMT. The parking charges
documented in the research have been updated to 2017 dollars. Table 5 documents the VMT
reductions by neighborhood place type and parking charge. Users should select the daily parking
fee closest to the per-day cost to commuters, whether it is paid on a daily, monthly, or annual
basis. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑇𝑇𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 5 × % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒
22 Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Technical Appendices. Prepared for the Urban Land Institute. 23 Todd Litman. 2017. Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (VTPI). http://www.vtpi.org/elasticities.pdf. Accessed July 2017.
August 27, 2020 Page 19 of 32
Table 5. VMT Reduction by Daily Parking Fee and Neighborhood Place Type
Daily Parking Fee
Place Type
Central City Urban Urban High Transit Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
$1.14 6.9% 6.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9%
$2.28 12.5% 12.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9%
$3.42 16.8% 16.8% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7%
$4.56 17.8% 17.8% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
$5.70 18.8% 18.8% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2%
$6.85 19.8% 19.8% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%
1.2.5.11 TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits
This strategy requires the project employers to provide general commute benefits to employees,
which may include financial subsidies or pre-tax deductions for transit, carpooling, and
vanpooling activities.
The strategy’s evidence is from a study that contains several case studies on the influence of
commuter benefits on employee travel.24 The one most fitting for this category is that travel
impacts are affected by the magnitude of the benefit and the quality of travel options available.
Mode shifts tend to be greatest if current transit use is low. In New York City, where transit
commute rates are already high, transit benefits only increased transit use 16% to 23%, while in
Philadelphia, transit commuting increased 32% (Schwenk, 1995). Similarly, only 30% of employees
who received transit benefits who work in San Francisco increased their transit use, while 44% of
those in other parts of the region commuted by transit more (Oram Associates, 1995). The 44%
figure was used in the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool and an assumption was made of a one-to-
one relationship between increased transit use and reduced commute VMT. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=44% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇× % 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.12 TP 12 Neighborhood Schools
This strategy requires the project to contribute to the development of a neighborhood school
that would serve families living in the development. Neighborhood schools primarily serve the
neighborhoods immediately surrounding the school and allow students to walk or bike to school,
24 Litman, Todd. 2017. Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (VTPI). http://www.vtpi.org/elasticities.pdf. Accessed July 2017.
August 27, 2020 Page 20 of 32
reducing the use of automobiles for drop-off and pick-up trips and thereby reducing VMT. This
strategy applies to residential land uses only.
The strategy’s evidence is from a study that investigated the effects of school choice on
walkability and mode choice for schools in St. Paul, Minnesota.25 The study reported a 78 percent
decrease in vehicle miles traveled by households traveling to a neighborhood school compared to
a citywide school. This reduction only affects home-based school VMT, which makes up 2.3% of
all home-based VMT per the California Household Travel Survey. The decrease in VMT is
estimated by multiplying the decrease in VMT for school trips by the share of home-based VMT
made up by school trips and by the user’s estimate of total households with school-aged children
in the project. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=77.7%× 2.3% × 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.13 TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
This strategy would require project employers or building operators to organize a carpool
matching program for individuals who have similar commute patterns. This strategy encourages
the use of carpooling, reducing the number of vehicle trips and thereby reducing VMT. The
strategy applies to employment land uses only. This strategy overlaps with three strategies: TP05
Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, TP09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet, and TP17
Vanpool Incentives.
The effect of ride-sharing programs on VMT is derived from a study by United States
Environmental Protection Agency.26 The study found that ride-sharing programs had an average
occupancy of 2.2 people per car and could achieve a 54.5% VMT reduction. This assumed
reduction is multiplied by the expected participation rate, which typically ranges between 2%
and 10%. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=54.5% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 × 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.14 TP 14 Transit Service Expansion
This strategy requires the project developer to subsidize transit service through fees and other
contributions to the transit provider, thereby improving transit service to the project, resulting in
increased use of transit and reduced VMT. The VMT reduction is based on the contribution’s
effect on transit frequency and the number of routes affected by the contribution. This strategy
25 Wilson, Elizabeth J., Ryan Wilson, and Kevin J. Krizek. 2007. "The Implications of School Choice on Travel Behavior and Environmental Emissions." Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 12.7: 506-518. 26 United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Implementing Commuter Benefits as One of the Nation's Best Workplaces for Commuters.
August 27, 2020 Page 21 of 32
differs from TP07 Subsidized or Discounted Transit Program in that subsidies are provided to the
public transit agency, not to transit riders. This strategy applies to both residential and
employment land uses. Proposed changes to transit service should be negotiated with the Lead
Agency and the applicable transit operator.
A synthesis of research documenting the effects of transit service strategies on transit ridership
and VMT found that a 1 percent increase in service frequency leads to a ridership increase of 0.5
percent.27 The user-input change in transit frequency is multiplied by this elasticity, and the route
contribution proxy.
The route contribution proxy is an adjustment factor to account for the share of transit ridership
increases that reflect ridership shifting from other lines. It is determined by the percentage of
routes affected by the improvement. If less than half are affected, 50 percent of riders are
assumed to come from other lines. If more than half are affected, 15 percent are assumed to
come from other lines.25
The resulting increase in ridership is multiplied by the existing transit mode share for the TAZ or
half-mile buffer around the parcel and an adjustment factor prorating VMT to transit trips (0.67)28
to yield the percent VMT reduction. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=0.5 × 0.67 × % 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴× 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴× 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑃𝑃𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴=50% (𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 50% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟);
85% (𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 50% 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟)
1.2.5.15 TP 15 Behavioral Intervention
This strategy requires project to provide intensive one-on-one counseling and encouragement,
along with subsidies, to encourage individuals to use non-drive alone modes. Implementing this
program encourages the use of transit, shared ride modes, bicycling, walking, and telecommuting,
reducing drive-alone trips and thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to residential and
employment land uses. This strategy overlaps with TP04 Commute Trip Reduction Marketing and
Education, TP05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, and TP18 Voluntary Travel
Behavior Program.
27 Handy, Susan et al. 2013. Impacts of Transit Service Strategies on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency. 28 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2010. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Government to Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhous Gas Mitigation Measures.
August 27, 2020 Page 22 of 32
The strategy is based on the study that analyzed the effects of a targeted behavioral intervention
treatment (UCLA Transportation Guide) on travel behavior of incoming graduate students in
UCLA. The study included 3,166 admitted students, half of whom received the guide and half of
whom where in the control group.29 The treatment guide provides detailed information on how to
use alternative modes of transportation to access campus. Students in the treatment group drove
23.6 miles per week on average compared to 33.6 miles for the control group, representing an
approximately 30% decrease. The study noted that the treatment was only effective among
students who moved within the past six months and was also only effective among students who
have automobile resources. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=30% 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 × 𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒/𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟
1.2.5.16 TP 16 Unbundle Parking Costs from Property Cost (On Site Parking)
The strategy requires project developers or building operators to unbundle the cost of parking
spaces from the price of the property. Residents must rent or purchase parking spaces separately
from their residential units. This increases the cost of auto ownership, thereby discouraging auto
ownership and use, which reduces VMT. Surrounding streets must have parking restrictions in
place, such as metered parking, time limits restricting overnight parking, and residential parking
permits (RPP) for which project residents are not eligible. This strategy applies to residential land
uses only.
The -0.4 elasticity of vehicle ownership with respect to vehicle costs is derived from a study that
provides inferential support on the effect of vehicle costs on vehicle ownership.30 Charging for
parking separately increases the cost of vehicle ownership, which makes owning a car less
attractive, thus reducing automobile use and VMT. The estimated reduction in vehicle ownership
is estimated by multiplying the percent change in vehicle cost (based on monthly parking fees
and the cost of vehicle ownership) by the elasticity of demand. The average base vehicle
ownership cost is $8,849, as reported by the American Automobile Association in 2018.31 Since
reducing vehicle ownership does not eliminate driving or use of taxis and ride-hailing apps, the
reduction in vehicle ownership is multiplied by 85 percent to produce the percent VMT reduction
generated by this strategy.32
29 Brown, Anne, et al. 2016. The Right Time and Place to Change Travel Behavior: An Experimental Study. 30 Litman, Todd. 2009. Parking Requirement Impacts on Housing Affordability. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 31 American Automobile Association. August 2018. Your Driving Costs. http://newsroom.aaa.com/tag/driving-cost-per-mile/. Accessed October 2018. 32 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Government to Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhous Gas Mitigation Measures. 2010
August 27, 2020 Page 23 of 32
% 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=𝐶𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴× 𝑅𝑅 𝑊𝑊ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟: 𝐶𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 = (𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑝𝑝𝐴𝐴 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑏𝑏𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟)/(($8,849/12)) 𝑅𝑅 = 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟 𝑂𝑂𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 = 0.85
1.2.5.17 TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
The strategy requires project employers or building operators to provide subsidies for individuals
forming new vanpools for their commute. This encourages the use of vanpools, reducing drive-
alone trips and thereby reducing VMT. This strategy applies to employment land uses only. This
strategy overlaps with the TP05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, TP09 Free Door-
to-Door Transit Fleet, and TP13 Ride-Sharing Program strategies.
The strategy’s evidence is from a study that used 1999 survey data from the Commute Trip
Reduction Program of the Puget Sound region to analyze the relationship of demand for vanpool
services to fare changes using a conditional discrete choice model.33 The study found a -0.73
elasticity of vanpool demand in response to a change in fares (or costs to driver). This elasticity is
multiplied by the percent reduction in vanpool fare as well as the percent of employees who are
expected to participate in vanpooling, An adjustment factor of 82.1% is applied to adjust the
vanpool demand to VMT, reflecting an average occupancy of 5.6 commuters per vanpool
including the driver.34 % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 = 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 × % 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝐴𝐴𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 𝑜𝑜𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟× 82.1%× % 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
33 Concas, S. Winters, F. 2005. Fare Pricing Elasticity, Subsidies and The Demand for Vanpool Services. Via Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Online TDM Encyclopedia. http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/. Accessed July 2017. 34 Way to Go program Annual Report, Denver Regional Council of Governments, 2015.
August 27, 2020 Page 24 of 32
1.2.5.18 TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
This strategy requires project employers or building operators to administer a program that
targets individual attitudes and behaviors towards travel and provides tools for individuals to
analyze and alter their travel behavior. Voluntary Travel Behavior Change programs include
communication campaigns, marketing and promotions, and travel feedback programs, such as
travel diaries or feedback on calories burned from activities and travel. This strategy encourages
the use of shared ride modes, transit, walking, and biking, thereby reducing VMT. This strategy
applies to residential and employment land uses. This strategy overlaps with the TP04 Commute
Trip Reduction Marketing/Education, TP05 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, and
TP15 Behavioral Intervention strategies.
The VMT reduction is based on a synthesis of research that reviewed five studies reporting the
impact of Voluntary Travel Behavior Change programs on VMT.35 A 4% reduction in VMT, which
represents a lower-end figure from the range of VMT reductions among the United States
examples in the study, is used in the calculation for this strategy. % 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=4%× % 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
35 Spears, Steven et al. 2013. Policy Brief on the Impacts of Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Programs Based on a Review of the Empirical Literature. California Air Resources Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency.
August 27, 2020 Page 25 of 32
Table 6. TDM Program Strategy Elasticities and Reductions
Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
TP 01 School Pool Programs Binary Input VMT / participating household -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% -8.25% -8.25%
TP 02 Bike Sharing Programs Binary Input Percent change in bicycle trips -6% -6% -6% -6% -6% -6% -6%
TP 03 Car Sharing Programs
Percent of eligible residents or employees
VMT / member -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% -32.8% -32.8%
TP 04
Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Marketing and Education
Percent of eligible employees
VMT / worker -4% -4% -4% -4% -4% -4% -4%
TP 05
Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program
Percent of eligible employees
VMT / worker 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2%
TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out
Percent of eligible employees
VMT / worker 7.7% 7.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%
TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program Percent of Transit Subsidy VMT / worker -43% -43% -43% -43% -43% -43% -43%
TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules
Alternative Work Schedule and Percent of eligible employees
VMT / worker
Telecommuting 1.5 days per week: -0.22 4/40 schedule: -0.15 9/80 schedule: -0.07
TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet
Percent of eligible employees
VMT / worker 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% 47%
August 27, 2020 Page 26 of 32
Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
TP 10 Price Workplace Parking
Percent of eligible employees and parking fee
VMT / worker Varies based on price of parking. See strategy method, Table 5.
TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits
Percent of reduction in commute VMT Percent of eligible employees
VMT / worker 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44%
TP 12 Neighborhood Schools
Type of school serving project and percent of households with school aged children
VMT / household 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8%
TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
Percent of eligible employees
VMT / worker 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% 54.5% 54.5%
TP 14 Transit Service Expansion
Percent of increase in transit frequency and Percent of routes affected by upgrade
% change in transit ridership / % change in frequency 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
TP 15 Behavioral Intervention
Percent individuals participating / eligible
VMT / worker 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
August 27, 2020 Page 27 of 32
Strategy ID Strategy Development Input Type of Elasticity or Reduction1
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
TP 16
Unbundle Parking Costs from Property Cost (On Site Parking)
Monthly Parking Costs
% change in vehicle ownership / % change in annual vehicle cost -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4
TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
Percent of employer subsidized vanpool costs and percent of eligible employees
% change in vanpool demand / % change in vanpool costs -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 -0.73 -0.73
TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
Percent of eligible employees
VMT / worker 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Note: 1. Elasticities are expressed as a decimal less than 1 while reductions are expressed as a percentage or a constant.
August 27, 2020 Page 28 of 32
1.2.6 Category, Cross Category, and Global Maxima
To provide reasonable estimates of VMT reduction effectiveness, maximum VMT reductions are
set for the category, cross-category, and global levels. These maxima ensure that 1) strategies that
target travel behavior in similar ways are not over-counted and 2) combined reductions are
reasonable given a project’s context (neighborhood place type). The maxima applied in the
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool are derived from the 2010 CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas
Mitigation Measures report.36
1.2.6.1 Category Maxima
Each category has a maximum allowable per capita VMT or per worker VMT reduction for the
combination of measures in the category. The maxima vary depending on the project’s
neighborhood place type. (Neighborhood place type definitions and assignments to specific
parcels are informed by research, as summarized in Section 1.1 and Table 1.)
The effects of multiple measures within a category are combined using multiplicative dampening,
which reduces the effect of individual strategies as new strategies are added. Since multiple
measures may affect the same user populations, this approach is used to ensure that reductions
are not over-counted. For example, a transit-related measure and a bicycle-related measure may
target the same person, but that person cannot switch from driving to both using transit and
bicycling. As a result, the overall per capita VMT that can be affected by added strategies is lower
than for any strategy implemented on its own. The equation for multiplicative dampening is
shown below:
𝐶𝐶𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑤𝑤𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴=1 − �(1 −𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖)𝐾𝐾
𝑖𝑖=1 𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖= 𝑃𝑃𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴
Per capita and per worker VMT reductions should be multiplied using the above multiplicative
dampening equation across all mitigation measures in that category up to the maxima shown in
Table 7.
36 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Government to Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. 2010.
August 27, 2020 Page 29 of 32
Table 7. Project Characteristics Maxima
Category
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
Project Characteristics 65% 30% 30% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Multimodal Infrastructure 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15%
Parking 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Program 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
1.2.6.2 Physical Cross-Category Maxima
A cross-category maximum is provided for the combination of project characteristics, multimodal
infrastructure, and parking strategies. Like the method used for the category maxima, the effect of
multiple categories is combined using multiplicative dampening to ensure that reductions are not
over-counted.
𝐶𝐶𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑅𝑅𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑃𝑃ℎ𝐴𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑉𝑉𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=1 − �(1 −𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖)𝐾𝐾
𝑖𝑖=1 𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖= 𝑃𝑃𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝐴𝐴 𝑟𝑟
The development’s per capita VMT and per worker VMT reduction across these three categories
should be capped at the levels shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Physical Cross-Category Maxima
Cross-Category Maximum
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
Per Capita / Employee VMT Reduction 70% 35% 35% 15% 15% 15% 15%
August 27, 2020 Page 30 of 32
1.2.6.3 Programmatic Cross-Category Maxima
For the programmatic measures, per capita and per employment VMT reductions are capped to a
25 percent maximum.
1.2.6.4 Global Maxima
Across physical and programmatic categories, per capita and per worker VMT reductions are
capped to maxima based on neighborhood place type, as shown in Table 9. Like the category
maximums, the physical and programmatic categories are combined using multiplicative
dampening to ensure reductions are not double counted. The reductions are calculated as noted
below.
𝐶𝐶𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑅𝑅𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟=1 − �(1 −𝑅𝑅𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖)𝐾𝐾
𝑖𝑖=1
Table 9. Global Maxima
Cross-Category Maximum
Neighborhood Place Type
Central City Urban
Urban High Transit
Urban Low Transit
Suburb w/ Multifamily Housing
Suburb w/ Single Family Homes
Rural in Urbanized Area Rural
Per Capita / Employee VMT Reduction 75% 40% 40% 20% 20% 20% 20%
August 27, 2020 Page 31 of 32
2. VMT Reduction Strategies
Dependencies
As noted in the descriptions of the individual VMT reduction strategies in Section 1.2, a number of
reduction strategies overlap with each other. For instance, a strategy may consist of a basket of
measures which may overlap with some of the measures in another strategy. Therefore, the
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool logic has been coded to reflect these dependencies, so that if one
measure is chosen, other overlapping measures are not allowed. The dependencies in the tool are
summarized below and are shown in the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool by greying out certain
reductions so that they cannot be selected.
If this strategy is chosen… This strategy is not allowed…
PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities • TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education
• TP 05 Implement CTR Program
• TP 15 Travel behavior Change
• TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
TP 05 Implement CTR Program
• PK 02 Provide Bike Facilities
• TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education
• TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules
• TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
• TP 15 Behavioral Intervention
• TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
• TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out • TP 10 Price Workplace Parking
TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program • TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits
TP 08 Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules • TP 05 Implement CTR Program
TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet • TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
• TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
TP 10 Price Workplace Parking • TP 06 Employee Parking Cash-Out
TP 11 Alternative Transportation Benefits • TP 07 Subsidized Transit Program
August 27, 2020 Page 32 of 32
If this strategy is chosen… This strategy is not allowed…
TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs • TP 05 Implement CTR Program
• TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet
• TP 17 Vanpool Incentives
TP 15 Behavioral Intervention
• TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education
• TP 05 Implement CTR Program
• TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
TP 17 Vanpool Incentives • TP 05 Implement CTR Program
• TP 09 Free Door-to-Door Transit Fleet
• TP 13 Ride-Sharing Programs
TP 18 Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Program
• TP 04 CTR Marketing and Education
• TP 05 Implement CTR Program
• TP 15 Behavioral Intervention
8601 Mission Drive Project
Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
9 | P a g e
ATTACHMENT B – SGVCOG SCREENING ANALYSIS
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report Page 1
Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: January 20, 2022, 11:49:33 PM
Project Name: 8601 Mission Drive
Project Description: 37 Single Family Homes
Project Location
Jurisdiction:
Rosemead
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
APN TAZ
5389-009-030 22180100
5389-009-031 22180100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:
Single Family DU:
Multifamily DU:
Total DUs: 0
Non-Residential:
OKce bSF:
Local Serving Retail bSF:
Industrial bSF:
Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):
Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:
Motor Vehicle ParWing:
Bicycle ParWing:
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report Page 2
Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results
Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population
VMT Baseline Description 1: SGVCOG Average
VMT Baseline Value 1: 34/9
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local Jurisdiction: N&A
.ithout Project .ith Project F Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project F All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
26/78 null null
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) null null
DOC 6357570.D15
November 8, 2021
Ref. DOC 6338995
Mr. Marco Midence Senior Project Engineer C&V Consulting, Inc. 9830 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, CA 92618
Dear Mr. Midence:
Will Serve Letter for 8601 Mission Drive
The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (Districts) received your will serve letter request for the subject project on October 8, 2021. The proposed project is located within the jurisdictional boundary of District No. 15. We offer the following comments regarding sewerage service:
1. The wastewater flow originating from the proposed project will discharge to a local sewer line, which is not maintained by the Districts, for conveyance to the Districts’ Grand Avenue Trunk Sewer, located in Mission Drive at Ivar Avenue. The Districts’ 18-inch diameter trunk sewer has a capacity of 5.9 million
gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow of 0.7 mgd when last measured in 2013.
2. The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) located adjacent to the City of Industry, which has a capacity of 100 mgd and currently processes
an average flow of 66.9 mgd. All biosolids and wastewater flows that exceed the capacity of the San Jose Creek WRP are diverted to and treated at the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant in the City of Carson.
3. The expected average wastewater flow from the project site, described in the application as 35 single-family homes, is 9,100 gallons per day. For a copy of the Districts’ average wastewater generation factors, go to www.lacsd.org, under Services, then Wastewater Program and Permits, select Will Serve Program, and scroll down to click on the Table 1, Loadings for Each Class of Land Use link.
4. The Districts are empowered by the California Health and Safety Code to charge a fee to connect facilities (directly or indirectly) to the Districts’ Sewerage System or to increase the strength or quantity of wastewater discharged from connected facilities. This connection fee is used by the Districts for its capital facilities. Payment of a connection fee may be required before this project is permitted to discharge to the Districts’ Sewerage System. For more information and a copy of the Connection Fee Information Sheet, go to www.lacsd.org, under Services, then Wastewater (Sewage) and select Rates & Fees. In determining the impact to the Sewerage System and applicable connection fees, the Districts will determine the user category (e.g. Condominium, Single Family home, etc.) that best represents the actual or anticipated use of the
parcel(s) or facilities on the parcel(s) in the development. For more specific information regarding the connection fee application procedure and fees, the developer should contact the Districts’ Wastewater Fee Public Counter at (562) 908-4288, extension 2727.
Mr. Marco Midence 2 November 8, 2021
DOC 6357570.D15
5. In order for the Districts to conform to the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the capacities of the Districts’ wastewater treatment facilities are based on the regional growth forecast adopted by the
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Specific policies included in the development of the SCAG regional growth forecast are incorporated into clean air plans, which are prepared by the South Coast and Antelope Valley Air Quality Management Districts in order to improve air quality in the South Coast and Mojave Desert Air Basins as mandated by the CAA. All expansions of Districts’ facilities must be sized and service phased in a manner that will be consistent with the SCAG regional growth forecast for the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial. The available capacity of the Districts’ treatment facilities will, therefore, be limited to levels associated with the approved growth identified by SCAG. As such, this letter does not constitute a guarantee of wastewater service, but is to advise the developer that the Districts intend to provide this service up to the levels that are legally permitted and to inform the developer of the currently existing capacity and any proposed expansion of the Districts’ facilities.
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (562) 908-4288, extension 2708 or at dcurry@lacsd.org.
Very truly yours,
Donna J. Curry Customer Service Specialist Facilities Planning Department
DC:dc
