CC - Item 4G - Approval of Traffic Calming Measures on Temple City Boulevard Between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus DriveROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BEN KIM, CITY MANAGER 56L--
DATE:
v
DATE: JANUARY 10, 2023
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ON TEMPLE CITY
BOULEVARD BETWEEN SOUTH OF VALLEY BOULEVARD TO
LOFTUS DRIVE
SUMMARY
At the October 6, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting, staff presented recommendations and
options for traffic improvements along the segment of Temple City Boulevard between just south
of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive. After discussion and presentation of the item, the Traffic
Commission approved the staff s traffic improvement recommendations for Temple City Blvd.
The Traffic Commission recommended items are shown on the "Installation Exhibit" in
Attachment C. Public Works Field Services staff will complete all the recommended items.
Additional materials and supplies that may be required to complete the work will be purchased
and funded by the approved Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Traffic Signs and Markers fund.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rosemead received a resident request to evaluate installation of speed humps along
the segment of Temple City Boulevard between just south of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive.
In response to this request, engineering staff completed a traffic review and recommended
appropriate traffic calming measures along this segment of Temple City Boulevard. The traffic
review included an analysis of existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately 3 years of
available collision data, average daily traffic (ADT) counts, a 24-hour Speed Survey, as well as an
examination of the field conditions.
ANALYSIS
Temple City Boulevard runs north and south and is considered a Minor Arterial Road per the
California Road System Map with a posted speed limit of 40 MPH. Temple City Boulevard is
AGENDA ITEM 4.G
City Council Meeting
January 10, 2023
Page 2 of 5
approximately 62 -feet wide with two lanes of travel in each direction and a double yellow center
line. Parking is allowed on both sides of Temple City Boulevard where the curbs are not marked
red. This segment of Temple City Boulevard is traffic signal controlled at Valley Boulevard,
Marshall Street, and Loftus Drive. This segment of Temple City Boulevard runs through Single
Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Ellis Lane runs north and south and is considered a local road per the California Road System Map
with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH. Ellis Lane is approximately 40 -feet wide with one lane
of travel in each direction and a marked yellow center line. Parking is permitted on both sides of
Ellis Lane where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping days. Ellis Lane is stop -
controlled at Temple City Boulevard. This portion of Ellis Lane runs through Single Family
Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Within the City of Rosemead, Guess Street runs east and west and is considered a local road per
the California Road System Map with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH. Guess Street is
approximately 30 -feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and no marked center line.
Parking is permitted on both sides of Guess Street where the curbs are not marked red except on
street sweeping days. Guess Street is stop -controlled at Temple City Boulevard. This portion of
Guess Street runs through Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Marshall Street runs east and west and is considered a Major Collector Road per the California
Road System Map with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH. Marshall Street is approximately 40 -
feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and a double yellow center line as it approaches
Temple City Boulevard. Parking is permitted on both sides of Marshall Street where the curbs are
not marked red except on street sweeping days. Marshall Street is traffic signal -controlled at
Temple City Boulevard. This portion of Marshall Street runs through Single Family Residential
(R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Loftus Drive runs east and west and is considered a local road per the California Road System
Map with a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Loftus Drive is approximately 60 -feet wide with two
lanes of travel in each direction and a double yellow center line. Parking is permitted on both sides
of Loftus Drive where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping days. Loftus Drive
is traffic signal -controlled at Temple City Boulevard and is a T -intersection. This portion of Loftus
Drive runs through Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
A Collision History Analysis and investigation was conducted for the subject location. Collision
data was obtained from the computerized collision records system maintained by the State of
California called the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems (SWITRS). The collision
analysis was conducted over approximately a 3 -year period between August 2020 through August
City Council Meeting
January 10, 2023
Page 3 of 5
2022 (available data at the time of traffic review). A review of available collisions that were
reported to SWITRS within 50 feet of each intersection and midblock along Temple City
Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive was conducted. Based on the Collision
History Analysis and investigation, it was determined that there were 11 total collisions reported.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data was obtained from counts taken on February 3rd, 2022, on
Temple City Boulevard along the subject segment. Temple City Boulevard carries 20,100 vehicles
per day per the ADT count.
To assess the speed at which vehicles were traveling along Temple City Boulevard in this area,
speed samples taken over a 24-hour period was surveyed on February 3rd, 2022. Based on the
Speed Survey, the 85th percentile speed of vehicles surveyed along this segment of Temple City
Boulevard was determined to be 48 MPH. This translates to mean that 85 percent of the vehicles
sampled during the survey were traveling at 48 MPH or below. It was noted during the speed
survey that most of the vehicles traveling more than 40 MPH were documented between 7:00 AM
to 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM — 7:00 PM. These results will serve as a guide to the Police Department
to allow for targeted spot enforcement during those times where vehicles are traveling higher than
40 MPH.
The resident requested for the City to evaluate speed humps on Temple City Boulevard from South
of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive. However, the City does not have a speed hump policy and
does not implement speed humps as a traffic control device. Regardless of the City's lack of speed
hump policy, typical criteria for speed hump implementation outlines that a street must have a
posted speed limit of 25 MPH or less and carry less than 3,000 vehicles per day. Temple City Blvd
does not meet the typical criteria for both traffic speed limit and volume. Other traffic calming
measures were recommended and determined to be a more appropriate improvement to address
the resident concerns.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Traffic Commission voted 4-0 to approve staff recommendations. It is recommended that the
City Council approve the Traffic Commission recommended items including:
1. INSTALL CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP PLAQUE below the existing stop
sign. Per Section 2C.59 cross traffic does not stop plaque (W44P). The CROSS TRAFFIC
DOES NOT STOP (W44P) plaque (see Figure 2C-9) may be used in combination with a
stop sign when engineering judgment indicates that conditions are present that are causing
or could cause drivers to misinterpret the intersection as an all -way stop.
City Council Meeting
January 10, 2023
Page 4 of 5
2. INSTALL RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN midblock on Temple City Boulevard
north of Marshall Street above existing 40 MPH speed sign on existing street light pole for
northbound traveling vehicles, per CAMUTCD Section 2B.13.19.
3. INSTALL SOLAR POWERED RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN with oversized
(30x36) 40 MPH speed limit sign (R2-1) midblock on Temple City Boulevard south of
Ellis Lane for southbound traveling vehicles, per CAMUTCD Section 2b.13.19.
4. REPAINT ALL EXISTING CROSSWALKS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
within the segment of Temple City Boulevard from Ellis Lane to Loftus Drive. Marshall
street at Temple City Boulevard and Loftus Drive at Temple City Boulevard.
5. TARGETED SHERIFF'S ENFORCEMENT: The Sheriffs Department will be notified
of speeding concerns along this segment and officers should conduct monitoring and
targeted enforcement for this area.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City of Rosemead Public Works Field Services Division will complete the recommended
items utilizing approved Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Traffic Signs and Markers available funds in
account 201-3010-5660. All recommended items will be performed by in-house staff. If necessary,
additional materials and supplies may be purchased at a minimal expense to complete the tasks.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed work involves the maintenance and minor alteration of existing public infrastructure;
therefore, the project is Class 1 Categorically Exempt pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT
The project is consistent with the City of Rosemead's Strategic Plan Goal C - Infrastructure and
Facilities, which is to enhance streets, sidewalks, and public infrastructure; coordinate with
relevant utility agencies regarding safety and enhancements; and modernize facilities by expanding
the use of wireless network technology and renewable energy.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process.
City Council Meeting
January 10, 2023
Page 5 of 5
Submitted by:
c/uuiSf-
Michael Chung, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Attachment A: October 6, 2022 Traffic Commission Staff Report
Attachment B: October 6, 2022 Traffic Commission Minutes
Attachment C: Installation Exhibit
Attachment A
October 6, 2022 Traffic Commission Staff Report
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
TO: TRAFFIC COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
FROM: MICHAEL CHUNG, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2022
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC REVIEW ON TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD BETWEEN
SOUTH OF VALLEY BOULEVARD TO LOFTUS DRIVE
61RO hL 0—I&A,
On behalf of the City of Rosemead, engineering staff completed a traffic review and recommended
appropriate traffic improvements along the segment of Temple City Boulevard between just south
of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive.
The City of Rosemead received a resident request to evaluate installation of speed humps along
the segment of Temple City Boulevard between just south of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive.
In response to this request and on behalf of the City, engineering staff completed a traffic review
and recommended appropriate traffic calming measures along this segment of Temple City
Boulevard.
ANALYSIS
The traffic review included an analysis of existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately
3 years of available collision data, average daily traffic (ADT) counts, a 24-hour Speed Survey, as
well as an examination of the field conditions.
Existing Conditions:
Temple City Boulevard: Temple City Boulevard runs north and south and is considered a Minor
Arterial Road per the California Road System Map with a posted speed limit of 40 MPH. Temple
City Boulevard is approximately 62 -feet wide with two lanes of travel in each direction and a
double yellow center line. Parking is allowed on both sides of Temple City Boulevard where the
curbs are not marked red. This segment of Temple City Boulevard is traffic signal controlled at
City Traffic Commission Meeting
October 6, 2022
Page 2 of 4
Valley Boulevard, Marshall Street, and Loftus Drive. This segment of Temple City Boulevard runs
through Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Ellis Lane: Ellis Lane runs north and south and is considered a local road per the California Road
System Map with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH. Ellis Lane is approximately 40 -feet wide
with one lane of travel in each direction and a marked yellow center line. Parking is permitted on
both sides of Ellis Lane where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping days. Ellis
Lane is stop -controlled at Temple City Boulevard. This portion of Ellis Lane runs through Single
Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Guess Street: Within the City of Rosemead, Guess Street runs east and west and is considered a
local road per the California Road System Map with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH. Guess
Street is approximately 30 -feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and no marked center
line. Parking is permitted on both sides of Guess Street where the curbs are not marked red except
on street sweeping days. Guess Street is stop -controlled at Temple City Boulevard. This portion
of Guess Street runs through Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning
Map.
Marshall Street: Marshall Street runs east and west and is considered a Major Collector Road per
the California Road System Map with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH. Marshall Street is
approximately 40 -feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and a double yellow center
line as it approaches Temple City Boulevard. Parking is permitted on both sides of Marshall Street
where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping days. Marshall Street is traffic signal -
controlled at Temple City Boulevard. This portion of Marshall Street runs through Single Family
Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Loftus Drive: Loftus Drive runs east and west and is considered a local road per the California
Road System Map with a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Loftus Drive is approximately 60 -feet
wide with two lanes of travel in each direction and a double yellow center line. Parking is permitted
on both sides of Loftus Drive where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping days.
Loftus Drive is traffic signal -controlled at Temple City Boulevard and is a T -intersection. This
portion of Loftus Drive runs through Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead
Zoning Map.
Collision Investigation: A Collision History Analysis and investigation was conducted for the
subject location. Collision data was obtained from the computerized collision records system
maintained by the State of California called the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems
(SWITRS). The collision analysis was conducted over approximately a 3 -year period between
August 2020 through August 2022 (available data at the time of traffic review). A review of
City Traffic Commission Meeting
October 6, 2022
Page 3 of 4
available collisions that were reported to SWITRS within 50 feet of each intersection and midblock
along Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive was conducted.
Based on the Collision History Analysis and investigation, it was determined that there were 11
total collisions reported.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data was obtained from counts taken
on February 3rd, 2022, on Temple City Boulevard along the subject segment. Temple City
Boulevard carries 20,100 vehicles per day per the ADT count.
Speed Survey: To assess the speed at which vehicles were traveling along Temple City Boulevard
in this area, speed samples taken over a 24-hour period was surveyed on February 3rd, 2022. Based
on the Speed Survey, the 85th percentile speed of vehicles surveyed along this segment of Temple
City Boulevard was determined to be 48 mph. This translates to mean that 85 percent of the
vehicles sampled during the survey were traveling at 48 mph or below. It was noted during the
speed survey that most of the vehicles traveling more than 40 MPH were documented between
7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM — 7:00 PM. These results will serve as a guide to the Police
Department to allow for targeted spot enforcement during those times where vehicles are traveling
higher than 40 mph.
Speed Hump Evaluation: The resident requested for the City to evaluate speed humps on Temple
City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive. The installation of speed humps
is based on roadway geometries, engineering judgment, and requires the review from both Fire
and Police Departments. Speed humps and other pavement undulations are not an approved traffic -
control device as defined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(CAMUTCD). The determination for installation of speed humps is based on volume, speed, and
collision data with resident approval and supported by an engineering study. Based on these
criteria's, at this time, the existing roadway of Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley
Boulevard to Loftus Drive is not a suitable candidate for the installation of speed humps. Temple
City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive carries more traffic and higher
speed than would be safe for installation consideration. The Speed Hump criteria outlines that a
street must have a posted speed limit of 25 mph or less and carry less than 3,000 vehicles per day.
Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive has a posted speed of 40
mph with 20,100 vehicles per day. Instead, other traffic calming measures were recommended and
determined to be a more appropriate improvement to address the resident concerns.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
After a thorough review of existing field and traffic conditions and per the California Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), California Vehicle Code (CVC), based on the
City Traffic Commission Meeting
October 6, 2022
Pace 4 of 4
traffic review and engineering judgement, it was determined that the segment of Temple City
Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive would benefit from additional traffic
calming measures and signage installation.
Please refer to Figure 4 in Attachment A for a conceptual exhibit representation of the proposed
recommendations. These improvements include:
1. INSTALL CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP PLAQUE below the existing stop
sign. Per Section 2C.59 cross traffic does not stop plaque (W44P). The CROSS TRAFFIC
DOES NOT STOP (W44P) plaque (see Figure 2C-9) may be used in combination with a
stop sign when engineering judgment indicates that conditions are present that are causing
or could cause drivers to misinterpret the intersection as an all -way stop.
2. INSTALL RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN midblock on Temple City Boulevard
north of Loftus Drive above new 40mph speed sign on existing street light pole for
northbound traveling vehicles, per CAMUTCD Section 213.13.19.
3. INSTALL SOLAR POWERED RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN with oversized
(30x36) 40 mph speed limit sign (R2-1) midblock on Temple City Boulevard south of Ellis
Lane for southbound traveling vehicles, per CAMUTCD Section 2b.13.19.
4. REPAINT ALL EXISTING CROSSWALKS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
within the segment of Temple City Boulevard from Ellis Lane to Loftus Drive. Marshall
street at Temple City Boulevard and Loftus Drive at Temple City Boulevard.
5. Optional Consideration: Install No left Turn (R3-2) sign with 6 am — 9am and 3 pm — 6
pm Mon -Fri plaque. Per CAMUTCD Section 2b.18. Local authorities, by ordinance, may
prohibit the making of any turning movement by any vehicle at any intersection or between
any designated intersections. Refer to CVC 22113.
A detailed traffic report and proposed figure diagram is attached as Attachment A to this staff
report, please refer to the proposed diagram in the attachment.
Prepared by:
Jana Robbins, Contract Traffic Engineering Division
Attachments:
A. Attachment A — Technical Traffic Engineering Report
M
TRANSTEch
TO: City of Rosemead, Department of Public Works
FROM: Traffic Engineering, Transtech Engineers, Inc.
DATE: October 6, 2022
SUBJECT: Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus
Drive
INTRODUCTION
The City of Rosemead received a resident request to conduct a traffic review evaluate installation of speed
humps along the segment of Temple City Boulevard between just South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus
Drive as shown in Figure 1. In response to this request and on behalf of the City, engineering staff
completed a traffic review and recommended appropriate traffic calming measures along this segment of
Temple City Boulevard. The traffic review included an analysis of existing roadway conditions, a review of
approximately 3 years of available collision data, average daily traffic (ADT) counts, a 24-hour Speed
Survey, as well as an examination of the field conditions.
Figure 1: Vicinity Map for Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
�jji
IT r�_
y.4J�iv^t� �r_k
ti- tom•e.: L'.-LJy e,l [ IIm n _
All
,.�y• f' ms's. w$i s.r � a `' J' � tom' "7 �� '1!'�� _
Sw
LEGEND �= Request Location: 0.5 Mile Segment of Temple City
Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
rreparea 8y: i ranstem tngmeers, InC. I Page i of u
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
Temple City Boulevard: Within the City of Rosemead, Temple City Boulevard runs north and south and is
considered a Minor Arterial Road per the California Road System Map with a posted speed limit of 40
MPH. Temple City Boulevard is approximately 62 -feet wide with two lanes of travel in each direction and
a double yellow center line. Parking is allowed on both sides of Temple City Boulevard where the curbs
are not marked red. This segment of Temple City Boulevard is traffic signal controlled at Valley Boulevard,
Marshall Street, and Loftus Drive. This segment of Temple City Boulevard runs through Single Family
Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Ellis Lane: Within the City of Rosemead, Ellis Lane runs north and south and is considered a local road per
the California Road System Map with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH. Ellis Lane is approximately 40 -
feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and a marked yellow center line. Parking is permitted
on both sides of Ellis Lane where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping days. Ellis Lane
is stop -controlled at Temple City Boulevard. This portion of Ellis Lane runs through Single Family
Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Guess Street: Within the City of Rosemead, Guess Street runs east and west and is considered a local road
per the California Road System Map with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH. Guess Street is
approximately 30 -feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and no marked center line. Parking
is permitted on both sides of Guess Street where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping
days. Guess Street is stop -controlled at Temple City Boulevard. This portion of Guess Street runs through
Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Marshall Street: Within the City of Rosemead, Marshall Street runs east and west and is considered a
Major Collector Road per the California Road System Map with a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH.
Marshall Street is approximately 40 -feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and a double yellow
center line as it approaches Temple City Boulevard. Parking is permitted on both sides of Marshall Street
where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping days. Marshall Street is traffic signal -
controlled at Temple City Boulevard. This portion of Marshall Street runs through Single Family Residential
(R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
Loftus Drive: Within the City of Rosemead, Loftus Drive runs east and west and is considered a local road
per the California Road System Map with a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Loftus Drive is approximately
60 -feet wide with two lanes of travel in each direction and a double yellow center line. Parking is
permitted on both sides of Loftus Drive where the curbs are not marked red except on street sweeping
days. Loftus Drive is traffic signal -controlled at Temple City Boulevard and is a T -intersection. This portion
of Loftus Drive runs through Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 2 of 12
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
Figure 2: Existing Conditions on Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
Az
A
4=:
Ay
1P, -F*
p b p �p p_ p p�
0
tAln
x f
LEGEND
dith����� vcm
S RS 1 p'Must"r Right Lane Must Turn ""v Speed Limit Ped Crossing (S1-1)
Stop ign ( -)
j
U"RUT
Right (R3-7)
R2-1
( )
�FmwYfXILLLS
L°MY°
°V.!,',�
Weight Limit Sign
\ j/ / I
1 1No
No Crossing (R9-3)
Parking or
(1136)�
. ;Stopping
��
PAWMG
�;;.. N,
Variations
1
Movement Restriction
(R61 Variation)
4
Weight Limit Sign (RS -2)
�y�y
1 va
,E.9a'
o
Existing
Traffic Signal
curt
Truck Route (1114-1)
®
No U-Turns(R3-4)
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 3 of 12
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Vallev Boulevard to Loftus Drive
PICTURE SUMMARY
LOFTUS DRIVE LOOKING NORTH TOWARDS
TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD LOOKING NORTH
TOWARD GUESS STREET
GUESS STREET LOOKING WEST TOWARDS
TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD LOOKING NORTH
TOWARDS MARSHALL STREET
TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD LOOKING NORTH
TOWARDS ELLIS LANE
GUESS STREET LOOKING EASTTOWARDS
TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
0$E _ A Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc I Page 4 of 12
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
A Collision History Analysis and investigation was conducted for the subject location. Collision data was
obtained from the computerized collision records system maintained by the State of California called the
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems (SWITRS). The collision analysis was conducted over
approximately a 3 -year period between August 2020 through August 2022 (available data at the time of
traffic review). A review of available collisions that were reported to SWITRS within 50 feet of each
intersection and midblock along Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
was conducted. Based on the Collision History Analysis and investigation, it was determined that there
were 11 total collisions reported. A summary breakdown of the number of collisions within the studied
segment are listed below and shown in Table 1 and depicted in Figure 3.
2022 —4 collisions
2021— 4 collisions
2020-3 collisions
Total Collisions —11
Table 1: Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared By: I ranstech Engineers, Inc. I Page 5 of 12
a•!w•
n•�,,s
r
Y+•uY
rY•w
i
•r
4/ww•
��
•�u+•e•Iww
va•
OwO�Y�
•4
OY•/
•.eDMOy
YtlDll
VNRi
ans
uww}9
um
v
•
•
ow•u�
�
m
YN1D�
awe
wva
0
�w
•a
s
w
o
V•
Vfp'mt
[me
�oeSa
m5
fd
•e
f
u•
o
uSAr ya»
Y�Y,DI
u•uanD
strafe
o
u•
v
•
w
•
W
Y)vm•
gttme
Ywvus
m
�}D
uP
w
••
•
q)e0e
�
x•
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared By: I ranstech Engineers, Inc. I Page 5 of 12
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
LEGEND
ALL COWSION6-Crash Type
INamFed& 91tr Glllsloni/GesM1esl
ger Crashes
PED&HIM - Crash Type
#&c.shes
Fatality(Death)
0
Fabhty(Death)
49
0
Severe injury
O
0
Severe Injury
��
0
Injury-Oher Visible
0
Injury -0i Visible
0
Injury- Complainte Pain
5
Injury - C nnplalntof Pain
0
Property Damage Only
6
Property Damage Only
0
iDbl
li
Total
o
TOTALCRASHES Il
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 6 of 12
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)
As a part of the traffic study, an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) count was taken on February 3'd, 2022 while
schools were back to in-person learning. A summary of the ADT data is shown in Table 2: Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) below. As shown below, this segment of Temple City Boulevard carries a total of 20,100
vehicles per day (vpd).
Table 2: Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Location Vehicles per Day (vpd) Vehicles per Day (vpd) Vehicles per Day (vpd)
Northbound Southbound TOTAL
2/3/12 2/3/22 2/3/22
Temple City Blvd S/0
Guess Street 1 10,434 9,666 20,100
Nutri �b UI IAN:i
To assess the speed at which vehicles were traveling along Temple City Boulevard in this area, speed
samples taken over a 24-hour period was surveyed on February 3rd, 2022. Based on the Speed Survey,
the 85th percentile speed of vehicles surveyed along this segment of Temple City Boulevard was
determined to be 48 mph. This translates to mean that 85 percent of the vehicles sampled during the
survey were traveling at 48 mph or below. Table 3 shows the February 3rd, 2022 speed survey results. It
was noted during the speed survey that most of the vehicles traveling more than 40 MPH were
documented between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM —7:00 PM. These results will serve as a guide to
the Police Department to allow for targeted spot enforcement during those times where vehicles are
traveling higher than 40 mph.
3: 2021 Speed Survey along Temple City Boulevard trom South of Valley Boulevard to Lottus
Dir. Of Date/Time of
Location SS%ile Speed Posted Speed Limit
Travel Survey
Temple City Blvd S/0 Guess NB/SB 9/28/2148 MPH 40 MPH
Street
_J
SPEED HUMP EVALUATION
The resident request was for the City to install speed humps on Temple City Boulevard from South of
Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive. The installation of speed humps is based on roadway geometrics,
engineering judgment, and requires the review from both Fire and Police Departments. Speed humps and
other pavement undulations are not an approved traffic -control device as defined in the California Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). The determination for installation of speed humps is
based on volume, speed, and collision data with resident approval and supported by an engineering study.
Based on these criteria's, at this time, the existing roadway of Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley
Boulevard to Loftus Drive is not a suitable candidate for the installation of speed humps. Temple City
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 7 o 12
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of ValleV Boulevard to Loftus Drive
Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive carries more traffic and higher speed than would
be safe for installation consideration. The Speed Hump criteria outlines that a street must have a posted
speed limit of 25 mph or less and carry less than 3,000 vehicles per day. Temple City Boulevard from South
of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive has a posted speed of 40 mph with 20,100 vehicles per day. Instead,
other traffic calming measures were recommended and determined to be a more appropriate
improvement to address the resident concerns.
TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES AND STRATEGIES
Traffic calming is the process of reducing vehicle speeds using both passive devices, such as signs and
striping, and physical devices such as changes in road elevation or path. As part of this study, traffic
speeds, collisions, and traffic volumes were used to assess existing conditions along this segment. The
type, design, and placement of traffic calming devices depend upon the road classification, desired traffic
speed and types of traffic issues along Temple City Boulevard from South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus
Drive. The following is a list traffic calming measures that are recommended for this segment:
1) Larger Dimension Signs: Installation of larger dimensioned signage are recommended as treatments
to increase the motorist's awareness and other Driver conditions by highlighting various areas of the
roadway. All sign dimensions should comply with the dimensions specified in the California Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Table 20-1 Regulatory Sign and Plaque Sizes. The larger
sizes are shown in the multi -lane column as 36"x36" for stop signs and 30"x36" for speed limits.
Table 26-1. Regulatory Sign and Plague Sizes (Sheet 1 of 4)
2) Radar Feedback Signs: Radar feedback signs are an effective way to alert Drivers of their speed. The
speed of each passing vehicle is taken and displayed next to the posted speed limit.
3) Targeted Police Enforcement: The police department deploys officers to perform enforcement on
residential streets for at least an hour a day.
RECOMMENDATIONS
After a thorough review of existing field and traffic conditions and per the California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), California Vehicle Code (CVC), based on the traffic review and
engineering judgement, it was determined that the segment of Temple City Boulevard from South of
Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive would benefit from additional traffic calming measures and signage
installation. Please refer to Figure 4 for a conceptual exhibit representation of the proposed
recommendations.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared by: I ranstech tngmeers, Inc. I Page S of 1L
Conve
nal Road
1
Signor Plaque
Section
Single;
Multi-
pressway
Freeway Minimum Oversiaad
Designation
Wne 1
Lane
1
Slop Rt -1
1 28.05
30 x 30' 1
36x36
1 36 x 36
— 3D x 30• 48 x 48
Speed Urnd R2.1
28.13
24 z 30.1
30 z 36
1 36.48
48 z 80 18 z 21• 3o z 38
2) Radar Feedback Signs: Radar feedback signs are an effective way to alert Drivers of their speed. The
speed of each passing vehicle is taken and displayed next to the posted speed limit.
3) Targeted Police Enforcement: The police department deploys officers to perform enforcement on
residential streets for at least an hour a day.
RECOMMENDATIONS
After a thorough review of existing field and traffic conditions and per the California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), California Vehicle Code (CVC), based on the traffic review and
engineering judgement, it was determined that the segment of Temple City Boulevard from South of
Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive would benefit from additional traffic calming measures and signage
installation. Please refer to Figure 4 for a conceptual exhibit representation of the proposed
recommendations.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared by: I ranstech tngmeers, Inc. I Page S of 1L
9
�a
_o
Z >V
Y. O
4A O
z W
° a w _0 T Z
or Z�w
0 h c H O z w O F j� &
C OwE
17z� v ° mNu rn¢F 00�
z d E Q 3 W 2n C>> z J a z a c
SIS- u o V > J� OOw a
wg O�
W R C N LL O
2 1 W Z
3°ao z 3 a Fz
Z w 0 e o o ry
O
w a q C
U�o U :: o 2(Do o> Z¢ z N E
(J W N
LLO =a v a w LLU� �Gw '^O 2m
o a _° � v 3 W° w a s N E
h WW G G N Z 6 ow a W m.
d yH K Y J
oo`dN-E u
u o f a>z
o m
0 ywj a m Q O O
CIS- C` LL>= O Zm u ws oa
F y V
2 0 CC
00 tD W J d
z ?� f 0 Z a a Z a° a
Aeu3 v ° '^err O��' t;
V O q 0 J O 6 Of H N Z a FZ a a a C t y
f W v fg vwz> 4Z.
2 m Q O V Z z= N Z R rJu N w V 2 m 02 E `o
O O O O O
TMIFIRWAW_
w
W
0
Q
I
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: ADT Count: Average Daily Traffic Counts
Attachment 2: ADT 24HR Speed Survey
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 10 of 12
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
Attachment 1: ADT Count: Average Daily Traffic Counts
Prepared by NDS/AM
Prepamd by MbOrMl D l9uwylry 5x
VOLUME
Temple City Blvd 5/0 Guess St
p4y; Thunday
D•te: 2/3/2022
CRY: Rosemead
Pro"#: CA21 02NA2 001
4M Peak M.
DAILY
07:45
07:90
PMPKk.
17:15
17:00
1716
w ftvPWm4
901
131
1Po7
PMKVO4mo
86k
788
1651
Pk Mr Paa
0.959
0.891
0.169
KMrrac ,
0697
0.904
0.897
7-1WWma
1511
12M
2856
4-61f wl
1503
1436
7945
7.9KA.,
07:30
Period
NB
4-6PxY
SB
OW
EB
WB
TOTALAM
731
1607
4-6KVPIUIM
am
786
15N
K Mr 1a
TOTAL
0s l9
WO.
Pk.Pa[br
0.833
&904
Y.666
0
0
65
147
168
0 0-
315
00:0
0
0
46
12:15
130
141
0 0
271
00:30
0
0
59
1230
125
167
0 0
292
WAS
81
0
0
30
198
12:45
134
536
151
627
0 0
285
1163
01:0
1
0
0
30
13:00
135
143
0 0
278
01:25
0
0
24
0:15
125
141
0 0
266
01:30
0
0
36
13:3D
140
151
0 0
291
01;45
N71
48
0
0
IS
105
13:45
135
535
138
573
0 0
273
1108
02:00
0
0
16
14:00
155
137
0 0
292
02:15
1
0
0
28
34:19
152
146
0 0
298
02:30
0
0
14
14:30
153
163
0 0
316
02:45
43
0
0
13
71
14:45
167
627
132
578
0 0
299
1205
03:0
1
0
0
19
15:0
160
149
0 0
309
03:15
1
0
0
18
15:15
178
165
0 0
343
03:30
13
16
0
0
29
15:30
140
193
0 0
333
WAS
1 9
37
13
51
0
0
n
88
15A5
175
653
169
676
0 0
344
1329
as:0
18
34
0
0
52
16:00
153
177
0 0
330
04:15
39
48
0
0
87
16:15
204
158
0 0
362
04:30
47
46
0
0
93
1630
167
140
0 0
307
04.45
as
148
43
171
0
0
87
319
16:45
179
No
173
648
0 0
352
1351
05:00
30
48
0
0
78
17:00
161
169
0 0
350
05:15
53
44
0
0
97
17:15
242
218
0 0
460
05:30
57
80
0
0
137
17:30
203
178
0 0
381
05:45
86
226
62
234
0
0
148
460
17:45
200
806
203
788
0 0
403
1594
m:0
45
88
0
0
133
18:0
223
184
0 0
407
06:15
92
66
0
0
158
2:15
181
167
0 0
348
06:30
102
81
0
0
183
18:30
180
143
0 0
323
WAS
153
392
109
344
0
0
262
736
18:45
153
737
132
626
0 0
285
1363
07:00
122
120
0
0
242
19:00
148
110
0 0
2S8
07:15
173
125
0
0
298
19:15
130
110
0 0
240
0:30
221
154
0
0
375
19:30
107
91
0 0
198
0:45
235
751
168
567
0
0
403
1318
19:45
94
479
82
393
0 0
176
872
08:0
231
179
0
0
410
20:DO
-156
96
0 0
202
08:15
214
205
0
0
419
20:15
M
86
0 0
162
08:30
189
179
0
0
368
20:30
55
80
0 0
135
WAS
187
821
154
717
0
0
343
1538
WAS
30
317
64
326
0 0
144
663
09:00
172
150
0
0
322
21:00
0
95
0 0
164
09:35
135
134
0
0
269
21:15
91
78
0 0
169
09:30
169
145
0
0
314
21:30
91
65
0 0
156
0:0
128
604
126
555
0
0
254
1159
21:45
61
312
52
2%
0 0
113
602
30;30
125
125
0
0
250
22:00
59
as
0 0
107
10:15
135
126
0
0
MI
22:15
38
31
0 0
0
10:30
121
115
0
0
236
22:30
52
37
0 0
89
WAS
147
528
119
485
0
0
266
1013
22:45
57
206
40
2%
0 0
97
362
13;0
176
181
0
0
357
23:00
46
31
0 0
77
11:15
152
125
0
0
277
23:15
50
29
0 0
79
13:30
154
146
0
0
300
23:30
46
24
0 0
70
11:0
137
619
135
587
0
0
272
206
23:45
53
195
18
102
0 0
71
297
TOTA15
4328
3883
8211
TOTALS
6106
5783
11849
SPLR%
52.7%47.3%
40.9%
SPLIT%
514%
48.6%
59.3%
DAILY
4M Peak M.
07:30
07:45
07:90
PMPKk.
17:15
17:00
1716
w ftvPWm4
901
131
1Po7
PMKVO4mo
86k
788
1651
Pk Mr Paa
0.959
0.891
0.169
KMrrac ,
0697
0.904
0.897
7-1WWma
1511
12M
2856
4-61f wl
1503
1436
7945
7.9KA.,
07:30
0745
07:10
4-6PxY
1700
OW
M.
7.9KVo1ume
901
731
1607
4-6KVPIUIM
am
786
15N
K Mr 1a
0.959
0s l9
6.959
Pk.Pa[br
0.833
&904
Y.666
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 11 or 12
Traffic Review on Temple City Boulevard between South of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive
Attachment 2: ADT 24HR Speed Survey
SPEED
Temple City Blvd 5/0 Guess St
Dap Thursday City: Rosemead
Date: 2/3/2032 Peeled e: CA22 020042 001
AM Vtluna
1
63
9J
330
"Al
ll8lf-.-
Stl
]el
1]
a311
%AM
]ti
s%
Ill
1%
ail
AMAekXwe
49.
11
d
03
de
0
A.
M
d�
01
oB
Volume
3
13
3i
L6
]d
i20
]03
3<
1]
1
1538
M Voi.:
]
A3
"1
833
1
3I3a
303
E[
dodee
%PM
dt
1%
1%
8%
ITA
3°
1%
M
P5
5PM
Pnk Nov
q
13
u
13.
13.
]l
33
35
33.
16:
l3.
volume
13
n
Ifb
Ana
8]
33
R
]
1s.
Md Wm l Mak Perbl
AM 74
NOON 32-2
lem
oNPealtvuluesi
All still
Volume
%
v.6—
K
volume
%
Volume
%
2856
14%
2271
11%
2945
15%
12028
60%
15th 58th
i kills A Etl3 Sallie AOT
Temple City BNtl I Su.m,m,
1 33
40
1 41 1
ae
53
1 20100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ROLE D Prepared Bv: Transterh Engineers, Inc. I Page 12 of 12
Attachment B
October 6, 2022 Traffic Commission Minutes
Minutes of the Regular
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING
October 6, 2022
The regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by Chair Drange at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California.
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Quintanilla
INVOCATION: Commissioner Hermosillo
PRESENT: Commissioner Hermosillo, Commissioner Lang, Commissioner Quintanilla and Chair
Drange
ABSENT: Vice Chair Nguyen
STAFF PRESENT: Director of Public Works Chung, City Engineer Chan and Commission Liaison
Nguyen
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chair Drange opened the public comment period.
The City received a Public Comment from Angela Thong expressing speeding concerns along Hart
Avenue. She also mentioned it is a safety concern that Hart Avenue between Guess Street and
Steele Street has no sidewalks and hard to see at night due to the street light being covered by the
tree.
Chair Drange closed the public comment period.
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
Chair Drange asked Traffic Commissioners if anyone would like to make revisions or additions to
the minutes of September 1, 2022.
Commissioner Hermosillo made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Lang, to accept
consent calendar. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Hermosillo, Lang, Quintanilla, Drange
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Nguyen
3. NEW BUSINESS
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 1 of 9
A. TRAFFIC REVIEW ON BROOKLINE AVENUE BETWEEN GUESS STREET AND
LOFTUS DRIVE
Chair Drange opened the Public Comment period.
The City received a Public Comment via phone from Mr. Somwan stating a lot of people make a
shortcut to Brookline Avenue from Valley Blvd to enter the 10 freeway and not concerned about the
residential speed. He suggested a stop sign at the intersection of Guess Street and Brookline
Avenue, as well as a stop sign at the intersection of Brookline Avenue and Marshall Street. Or add
a speed bump.
The City received a Public Comment via phone from Loui Morales stating there needs to be a stop
sign or speed bump on Brookline Avenue because people are using the street as a super highway
to get onto the freeway. He stated there are at least 6 to 10 cars that drive down Brookline Avenue
going at least 60 miles per hour every day. He commented this issue has been going on for years
and needs to be addressed before an accident happens.
Chair Drange closed the public comment period.
Traffic Engineer Robbins provided a brief description of the item and presented a PowerPoint
presentation of the studies that were conducted.
Traffic Engineer Robbins explained that the resident requested the City to conduct a traffic review
along Brookline Avenue between Guess Street and Loftus Drive due to reported speeding
concerns and to consider placing an all -way stop at the intersection of Marshall Street and
Brookline Avenue.
Traffic Engineer Robbins explained as part of the traffic review, engineering staff looked at the
existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately 3 years of available collision data, an
average daily traffic count (ADT), a 24-hour speed survey as well as an examination of existing
field conditions. On behalf of the City of Rosemead, Traffic Engineer Robbins provided
recommendations for a combination of traffic improvements that include the installation of speed
limit signs, refresh of stop bars and stop legends, as well as warnings placed under the Marshall
Street Stop signs alerting drivers that CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP.
Commissioner Hermosillo asked if staff had an estimate cost to implement these measures.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded she did not have a cost estimate.
Director of Public Works Chung replied that it would cost less than $2,000.
Commissioner Lang asked what the next steps would be if these measures do not work.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded the next steps would be to look at the cross traffic at Guess
Street or Marshall Street and do a more comprehensive examination of the cross streets. In
response to the resident request for speed humps, the City currently does not have a speed hump
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 2 of 9
policy in place. If not approved, we would consider adding side stripes to narrow the road or add a
centerline to visually narrow the street. At this time, the street does not meet the minimum warrants
for an all -way stop.
Director of Public Works Chung commented in addition to the recommendations mentioned,
increased traffic enforcement will also be implemented.
Commissioner Quintanilla asked if there was an option to switch stop signs, so that stop signs can
be placed on Brookline Avenue instead of Guess Street and Marshall Street.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded you have to go through a process of removing the existing
stop signs and that is not typically looked into.
Commissioner Quintanilla asked if there is any history of a street with insufficient warrants for an
all -way stop and they switched the stop signs, installed new striping and signage.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded there is no history of doing that in all the Cities she has
worked for. We would have to look into the liability issues of changing the stop signs out.
Commissioner Quintanilla commented that Brookline Avenue is open from Valley Boulevard to
Loftus Drive with little to no traffic mitigation measures. He asked if the option was considered and
disposed of, considered and pending, or not considered as an option.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded it was not considered an option.
Chair Drange asked if there was a reason why the stop signs are placed on Marshall Street instead
of on Brookline Avenue.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded she is unsure of the reason, but speculates the stop signs
were likely placed twenty years ago when the developments came in.
Commissioner Lang mentioned the traffic signal light at the intersection of Marshall Street and
Temple City Boulevard already helps slow down east and westbound traffic on Marshall Street. He
recalled Commissioner Quintanilla's point that Brookline Avenue is an open street that encourages
speeding due to no traffic mitigation.
Commissioner Quintanilla commented that the traffic signal light at the intersection of Marshall
Street and Temple City Boulevard was installed around ten years ago due to cars speeding down
Temple City Boulevard to enter the freeway.
Chair Drange asked if the traffic patterns have changed since then and suggested looking into
placing stop signs on Brookline Avenue.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded as part of their traffic review, they did an average daily traffic
count (ADT) for 24 -hours, and Brookline Avenue had 601 cars, which does not meet the warrants
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 3 of 9
for installation of an all -way stop. Guess Street also did not have enough traffic to warrant an all -
way stop.
Commissioner Hermosillo recalled the 85th percentile speed of vehicles along Brookline Avenue
north of Marshall Street was determined to be 35 mph and asked how many outliers may have
skewed the data.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded they have the hourly totals for the speeding explaining ten
percent of the vehicles, which is about 60 out of the 601, were driving in the 35 mph to 39 mph
range. There were about four vehicles traveling at about 45 mph. She commented the data does
show the speeding vehicles are driving down Brookline Avenue during the peak morning commute
hours and evening hours probably to get to the freeway.
Director of Public Works Chung added that the deputies will be informed to increase enforcement
in the area.
Commissioner Lang commented that with this phased approach with additional police enforcement,
it may help with the issue, however, should it get worst we should readdress the item.
Commissioner Hermosillo made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Lang, to approve
staff recommendations. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Hermosillo, Lang, Quintanilla, Drange
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Nguyen
B. TRAFFIC REVIEW AT THE INTERSECTION OF HART AVENUE AND STEELE STREET
Traffic Engineer Robbins provided a brief description of the item and presented a PowerPoint
presentation of the studies that were conducted.
Traffic Engineer Robbins explained that the resident requested the City to conduct a traffic review
at the intersection of Hart Avenue and Steele Street due to reported speeding concerns and to
consider placing an all -way stop at the intersection.
Traffic Engineer Robbins explained as part of the traffic review, engineering staff looked at the
existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately 3 years of available collision data, an ADT
(Average Daily Traffic) count as well as a 24 -Hour Speed Survey, as well as an examination of
existing field conditions. On behalf of the City of Rosemead, Traffic Engineer Robbins provided
recommendations for a combination of improvements that include the installation of speed limit
signs, refresh of stop bars and stop legends as well as warnings signs alerting drivers that CROSS
TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP.
Commissioner Hermosillo commented on the 85th percentile speed of vehicles was 27 mph on Hart
Avenue south of Steele Street, which is 2 mph above the speed limit and asked whether the
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 4 of 9
estimate cost of $2,000 to implement these measures would be justified. He added that he does
feel more public safety is better than less but wanted to bring attention to the argument.
Commissioner Quintanilla asked if there was consideration for crosswalks at the intersection of
Hart Avenue and Steele Street.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded that since there are no sidewalks on Hart Avenue except for
the northwest side going up towards Valley Boulevard, we would not be able to add the crosswalks
because it would not be ADA compliant.
Commissioner Hermosillo made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Lang, to approve
staff recommendations. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Hermosillo, Lang, Quintanilla, Drange
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Nguyen
C. TRAFFIC REVIEW ON TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD BETWEEN SOUTH OF VALLEY
BOULEVARD TO LOFTUS DRIVE
Chair Drange opened the Public Comment period.
The City received a Public Comment via email from the Soto Family stating the traffic signal light
on Valley Boulevard and Marshall Street is often green and does little to stop speeding onto or off
the 10 freeway. They requested for an all -way stop or a stop light set to red to prevent future
collisions.
The City received a Public Comment via email from Mr. Duc stating it is difficult to exit their
driveway due to speeding vehicles along Temple City Boulevard. He mentioned years ago CHP
officers would perform traffic checks and asked if they would come out again.
The City received a Public Comment via email from Resident of Temple City Boulevard stating it is
difficult exit their driveway due to large vehicles parked on the street. The person also mentioned
Amazon delivery trucks are speeding and causing traffic backup and the removal of the "No
Parking on Wednesday Mornings" sign resulted in the west side of the street not getting cleaned
and water runoffs not being removed.
The City received a Public Comment from Sylvia Lam stating traffic along Temple City Boulevard
normally exceeds the 40 mph speed limit and requesting to enforce a speed limit of 35 mph on
Temple City Boulevard between south of Valley Boulevard to Loftus Drive. She also requested to
install traffic lights at the intersection of Guess Street and Temple City Boulevard.
Chair Drange closed the public comment period.
Traffic Engineer Robbins provided a brief description of the item and presented a PowerPoint
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 5 of 9
presentation of the studies that were conducted.
Traffic Engineer Robbins explained that the resident requested the City to evaluate installation of
speed humps along the segment of Temple City Boulevard between just south of Valley Boulevard
to Loftus Drive.
Traffic Engineer Robbins explained as part of the traffic review, engineering staff looked at the
existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately 3 years of available collision data, average
daily traffic (ADT) counts, a 24-hour Speed Survey, as well as an examination of the field
conditions. On behalf of the City of Rosemead, Traffic Engineer Robbins provided
recommendations for a combination of improvements that include installing a CROSS TRAFFIC
DOES NOT STOP plaque below the existing stop sign, installing a radar speed feedback sign,
installing a solar powered radar speed feedback sign, repaint all existing crosswalks at signalized
intersections, and optional no left tum signs.
Chair Drange asked if the traffic lights on Marshall Street and Loftus Avenue are timed or metered.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded the lights are likely on loops in which as soon as they reach a
certain vehicle que, the lights will change, however, they would need to assess all the timing of the
traffic lights to confirm.
Chair Drange recalled the public comment mentioning the lights just stay green.
Traffic Engineer Robbins replied that some traffic lights give priority to the main street, but can look
into it to see if more time can be given to the traffic light on Marshall Street.
Director of Public Works Chung commented staff can investigate further into the public comment.
Commissioner Lang asked for clarification if the 7 symbol marker indicated on the proposed
diagram located north of Loftus Drive will be moved to north of Marshall Street.
Traffic Engineer Robbins confirmed they would like to move the proposed radar speed feedback
sign to the north of Marshall Street as that is where the speeding was shown to occur.
Commissioner Lang mentioned the freeway ramp exiting onto Temple City Boulevard is sharp and
vehicles are potentially speeding as they exit.
Traffic Engineer Robbins commented vehicles slow down at the curb when they exit the freeway
and as they approach the traffic light on Loftus Drive. After Marshall Street it looks like cars start
going.
Chair Drange asked the commissioners for their thoughts on option number five in the proposed
recommendations for installing no left turn sign with 6 AM — 9 AM and 3 PM — 6 PM MON-FRI
plaque.
Rosemead Trac Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 6 of 9
Commissioner Quintanilla asked if the signs were going to limit left turn onto Guess Street from
Temple City Boulevard when traveling north and south.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded the signs would only be for Guess Street, prohibiting vehicles
on Guess Street from turning left onto Temple City Boulevard during the designated times.
Commissioner Lang asked to confirm the data if there were only three broadside collisions in that
general area within three years.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded one accident occurred at Guess Street within the three years.
Commissioner Quintanilla mentioned of a vehicle accident that occurred on Ellis Lane years ago.
He described a motorcycle was going southbound on Temple City Boulevard and t -boned a vehicle
that was exiting Ellis Lane trying to head north onto Temple City Boulevard.
Traffic Engineer Robbins explained sometimes the drivers on side streets do not wait for a large
enough gap before moving forward and it is typically during the peak hours of traffic.
Commissioner Quintanilla commented the south segment after Valley Boulevard is problematic and
makes people want to speed onto the freeway.
Commissioner Lang asked if the major concern northbound or southbound on Temple City
Boulevard.
Traffic Engineer Robbins responded the traffic counts were balanced
Commissioner Hermosillo commented it should be just a right tum only sign. With a no left tum
during certain times, vehicles can still go straight and result in a possible collision.
Traffic Engineer Robbins agreed and suggested considering doing the same on Ellis Lane.
Chair Drange asked if the proposed installation of the right tum only sign at certain times on Ellis
Lane could it be added onto the list of recommendations.
Director of Public Works Chung replied that the recommendation can be added if requested by the
commission.
Commissioner Quintanilla asked for clarification on how the optional recommendation to restrict
vehicles going east and west on Guess Street impacts the speeding issue on Temple City
Boulevard.
Director of Public Works Chung explained it is to minimize the cross traffic and lower the risk of
accidents such as broadside collisions.
Commissioner Quintanilla commented he thought the no left turn signs was for vehicles on Temple
City Boulevard.
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 7 of 9
Director of Public Works Chung responded the signs are for vehicles traveling on Guess Street
making a left onto Temple City Boulevard.
Chair Drange asked if the data showed which travel direction the traffic was seen to be greater
during specific times such as in the morning hours or evening hours.
Traffic Engineer Robbins explained based on the average daily traffic (ADT) counts, the traffic is
relatively equal during the morning and evening hours.
Chair Drange opened the public comment period.
The City received a Public Comment via Zoom from Resident Silvia commenting that she feels the
proposed recommendations, specifically the optional no left turn sign during certain times on
Guess Street, does not help with slowing down traffic on Temple City Boulevard. She asked if the
speed signs do not help, what would be the next step.
Chair Drange followed up with the Public Comment mentioning that the optional recommendation
was related to collisions, whereas the other recommendations were intended to address the
speeding. He commented if the issue still persists, the item may be considered to be brought back
for discussion.
The City received a Public Comment from Resident Josie Alvarez mentioning about the traffic
count on Temple City Boulevard and asked if there was a traffic count for Guess Street. She
commented that the restrictive turning signs may not even be warranted for that street.
Chair Drange closed the public comment period.
Commissioner Quintanilla commented that most residents know to take Marshall Street when
turning onto Temple City Boulevard. He also suggested to add traffic enforcement as part of the
motion.
Director of Public Works Chung replied that moving forward with any reports of speeding, it will be
conveyed to the deputies to increase traffic enforcement in the area.
Commissioner Quintanilla asked if the City still has a contract with law enforcement motorcycles
and how many.
Director of Public Works Chung responded the City still has a contract, however, not sure how
many motorcycles at this time.
Commissioner Lang commented he is quite familiar with the traffic in the area and hopes the
proposed recommendations help in addressing the speeding issue. He agreed with Commissioner
Quintanilla's comment on residents knowing to use the traffic light on Marshall Street instead of
turning on Guess Street or Ellis Lane.
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 8 of 9
Commissioner Hermosillo commented he is not opposed to the addition of the signs as it may help
individuals not from the area. He asked what the average cost of the sign would be.
Director of Public Works Chung responded it would cost in the hundreds of dollars.
Commissioner Lang replied that the reason we do not add the signs is because it brings more
traffic to other areas.
Chair Drange agreed and was inclined to not move forward with the optional recommendation as
he felt it may not be unnecessary, but not needed in this case.
Commissioner Quintan ilia made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Hermosillo, to
approve staff recommendations number 1 through 4, add increased enforcement, have the
proposed radar speed feedback sign be moved to the north of Marshall Street, and to have
staff revisit the item in six months. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Hermosillo, Lang, Quintanilla, Drange
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Nguyen
4. MATTERS FROM STAFF None
5. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:19 p.m. The next Traffic Commission meeting is scheduled for
November 3, 2022, at 7:00 p.m. and will take place at the Rosemead City Hall, City Council
Chambers, 8838 East Valley Boulevard.
ATTEST:
X4�i w G(ez'�
Michael Chung, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of October 6, 2022
Page 9 of 9
Attachment C
Installation Exhibit
c
0
m
u
u
A
F
U L
y_ O
Op -
Z
7A3 p > V G f G Z m w b C W
a� p£ c �x� '•^�N =tea �a
o N p V w
li C C N �• m Q UUd• WN
N C H C
o J w Q p
~ V O C J N W o O U G O> 21 v
5 p a x 0
K O
Z D q
F
3 0 a o in >
Z Z V
O
u a p u V w O
W C
J U N M Z Y t� 0 J N
m p E p ��.. V O W ca
U W S N W Z F m C>
W a C O y> Q F W J Q e1 U
O
0 t61 �� o � cZ> Zz� zrE
�ry n 3r W OUB l7w< 2 v v
g�,av �Zo LL�Z �0w �oEv
p 2 p" ` w l7» w �> Q x 0 NG ot�
VI O O N Q N J m .�.. N C O
f' p N E= u Q r rc�~ 4 M Z u g v
Z V w a o m w 0 0 z N m
ow Z
Q¢ O p� W H So 0
0 ti C` LL N 0 O Z 2 V V W
V y Q W 0 0 W N O~ V w g 0
0 F d Q J LL p
yC V C p N N Q P o
N U D Q H N 0 O w �'F-
¢ 3 z0i7H Oaw ¢O W Saa c
J U Z OI J S o J x g '{ Z W 2 �>y
F Va�j W d N f C ' F p i '^ M-1 G K O z L
ZyOp� ?Zvw" �~iG ? a wN zuVWi�m Oi E o
O O O O O
. r f
i
� u f
I