CC - Minutes - 09-29-21 SpecialMINUTES OF THE
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 29, 2021
The special meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Low
at 5:30 p.m., in the Rosemead City Hall Council Chamber, located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard,
Rosemead, California.
PRESENT: Mayor Low, Mayor Pro Tem Dang (arrived late), Council Members Armenta
(arrived late), Clark, and Ly
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Richman and City Clerk Hernandez
1. CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS — Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54957.6:
AGENCY DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION: City Manager Molleda and
Acting Finance Director Chamberlain; and Katy Suttorp from Burke, Williams
and Sorensen, LLP
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION: Rosemead Employee Association
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATION OF LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9 (d)(2)
Number of Cases: 1
City Attorney Richman stated the City Council would go into Closed Session to
discuss two items and would report on any action taken.
Mayor Low recessed to Closed Session at 5:31 p.m. and reconvened back
at 7:00 p.m.
City Attorney Richman reported the City Council only addressed one item in
Closed Session and would return to Closed Session at the end of the meeting.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Tania Castaneda, Municipal Manager with Republic Services, announced an
upcoming free compost, bulky item drop-off, and e -waste event at Garvey
Community Center on October 16, 2021.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page I of 17
3. PRESENTATION
A. Recognition of Deputy Edward Chen for His Community Service as a Reserve
Deputy with the Los Angeles Sheriff Temple Station
Chief of Police, Lieutenant Hernandez, thanked Reserve Deputy Ed Chen. He then
read the unit commander's commendation from Los Angeles County Sheriff,
Lieutenant George Meza.
Mayor Low thanked Deputy Chen for his bravery and service to the Rosemead
community.
Council Member Ly spoke of his friendship with Deputy Chen and thanked him for
his service to the Sheriffs Department as a Reserve Deputy.
Council Member Armenta stated she was able to attend Deputy Chen's "Deputy
Reserve of the Year award" ceremony. She commended his civic service and
commitment to public safety.
Council Member Clark thanked Deputy Chen for taking risks and watching over
the streets of Rosemead.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang commended Deputy Chen for his work and commitment to
his role as a Reserve Deputy.
The City Council presented Deputy Chen with a certificate of recognition.
Deputy Chen thanked the City Council for the recognition and support of law
enforcement and the Rosemead Special Assignment Team.
B. Recognition of the Los Angeles Sheriff Temple Station, Rosemead Team
on their Award of Distinction from the California's Peace Officers Association
2021 Awards
Chief of Police, Lieutenant Hernandez recognized the Rosemead Special
Assignment Team's dedication to the community. The Peace Office Association
recognized the Special Assignment Team with an Award of Distinction.
Trustee Diane Benitez, President of the Rosemead School District Board, thanked
the Rosemead Special Assignment Team for their hard work and for receiving the
Award of Distinction.
The City Council thanked the Temple Sheriff Station Special Assignment Team,
for receiving the Award of Distinction at the Peace Office Association.
Council Member Clark thanked the deputies for their ongoing hard work.
Council Member Armenta appreciated their commitment to public safety.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 2 of 17
Mayor Pro Tem Dang reiterated and thanked the deputies for their hard work and
for receiving an award.
Council Member Ly thanked the deputies for their hard work and commitment to
public safety.
Mayor Low agreed with the rest of the City Council and thanked the deputies for
their commitment and hard work.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Armenta requested to pull item D of the consent calendar for
discussion.
ACTION: Moved by Council Member Ly and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dang
to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of item D. The motion was
carried out by the following roll call vote: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Dang, Low,
and Ly NOES: None.
A. AIPAC's 2021 Hispanic Leadership Retreat, September 26-28, 2021 —
Washington, D.C.
Council Member Sandra Armenta was invited and scheduled to participate in
AIPAC's 2021 Hispanic Leadership Retreat in Washington, D.C. The invitation
was received after the September 7, 2021, special City Council meeting. She is
attending the retreat in Washington, D.C., from September 26 through 28, 2021.
The City's Travel Policy# 20-02 states that approval is required for out-of-state
travel, except for an adjacent state.
Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the attendance, at City expense,
of Council Member Sandra Armenta to AIPAC's 2021 Hispanic Leadership Retreat
on September 26-28, 2021, in Washington, D.C.
B. Modification to Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home
Investment Partnership Program (HOME) Policies and Procedures Manuals
The City of Rosemead funds various economic development and housing programs
with federal Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") and Home
Investment Partnership Program ("HOME") entitlement funds. In April 2019 and
July 2019, the City Council approved the CDBG Policies and Procedures Manual
("CDBG Manual") and HOME Policies and Procedures Manual ("HOME
Manual"), respectively. Contained within the CDBG and HOME Manuals are the
guidelines governing the City's programs, including affordable housing.
The proposed modification to the CDBG and HOME Manuals is to establish two
new Homeownership Assistance Programs using CDBG and HOME funds by
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 19, 2021
Page 3 of 17
incorporating flexible City financing options that best meet the need of the
qualifying affordable homebuyer(s). The financing options include providing
down payment assistance, closing cost assistance, writing down the first mortgage
principal and/or interest rate. The type and level of assistance are determined on a
case-by-case basis which financing method is most appropriate to assist the
qualifying affordable families. The modification to the Manuals would also
update to reflect administration of the CDBG and HOME programs by the City's
Housing Division.
Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the modifications to the CDBG
and HOME Program Policies and Procedures Manuals subject to the approval of
the Substantial Amendment adding the programs to the City's 2021-2022 One Year
Action Plan which was considered at a public hearing on September 28, 2021.
C. City Council Designation and Appointment of Interim Community Development
Director as a Retired Annuitant Position
The City has opened the recruitment for a permanent Community Development
Director due to the resignation of the previous director. In order to ensure the
continuity of operations during this vacancy, staff is recommending the City
Council adopt a resolution to appoint Mr. Mark Persico as a Retired Annuitant to
the position of Community Development Director as authorized per California
Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21221(h).
Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the position of Interim Community Development Director and
authorize the position as a Retired Annuitant Position per California
Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21221(h);
2. Approve the appointment and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement
on behalf of the City with Mark Persico as the Interim Community
Development Director; and
3. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-43 authorizing the appointment of a retired
annuitant to the position of Interim Community Development Director.
CONSENT ITEMS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION
D. Walnut Grove Avenue Resurfacing Project Phase I From Marshall Street to
Northerly City Limit - Project No. 21028 — Award of Construction Contract and
Professional Services Agreement for Construction Management, Construction
Inspection, Geotechnical & Materials Testing Services
As part of the City's Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Capital Improvement Program, the
City Council approved the Walnut Grove Avenue Resurfacing Project Phase I from
Marshall Street to the northerly City Limit Project (500' north of Grand Avenue).
The project consists of removing and replacing existing asphalt pavement, concrete
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 4 of 17
sidewalk, curb and gutter, construction of colored crosswalk, signage and striping
and related improvements. The project is currently funded with a combination of
RMRA-SB-I and CalRecycle Funds, in the amount of $1,624,100.
Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions:
1. Determine the bid withdrawal letter dated August 5, 2021, by Hardy & Harper
satisfactorily meets the requirements of Section 5103 of Public Contract Code,
and therefore, relieve Hardy & Harper from the bid;
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a construction contract with All
American Asphalt for the bid amount of $1,342,157. In addition, authorize an
amount of $134,216 (10%) as a contingency to cover the cost of unforeseen
construction expenses, for a total amount of $1,476,373; and
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Z&K Consultants for
Construction Management, Construction Inspection, Geotechnical & Materials
Testing Services for the project, in the amount of $64,605.
Council Member Armenta asked what the difference in the contract for service vs.
the bids was. She stated there may be some overlapping of services or double
dipping. In addition, she asked if Transtech could perform some of the items in the
bid.
City Manager Molleda stated that the current agreement with Transtech covers the
routine, such as inspection and permit services to utility. The bid for the Walnut
Grove Avenue Resurfacing Project Phase is a much bigger project that requires a
full-time inspector.
Council Member Armenta asked if the City has an inspector on staff.
City Manager Molleda stated the City has an inspector only for routine daily
inspections.
Council Member Armenta asked who would provide project management if part of
the contract for Transtech involves project management services. There may be
overlapping services if the City already pays for services included in the Transtech
contract.
City Manager Molleda explained the project management services provided by
Transtech are for smaller -scope Capital Improvement Projects projects and day-to-
day projects only. The Walnut Grove Avenue Resurfacing Project Phase I project
requires additional assistance.
Mayor Low reiterated this is a separate project that is much bigger and that requires
a dedicated person to manage the project. The City inspector only oversees the day-
to-day operations of the City's smaller projects.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 5 of 17
ACTION: Moved by Council Member Ly and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dang
to accept the bid withdrawal letter from Hardy & Harper; authorize the City
Manager to execute a construction contract with All American Asphalt for the bid
amount of $1,342,157. In addition, authorize an amount of $134,216 (10%) as a
contingency to cover the cost of unforeseen construction expenses, for a total
amount of $1,476,373, and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with
Z&K Consultants for Construction Management, Construction Inspection,
Geotechnical & Materials Testing Services for the project, in the amount of
$64,605. The motion was carried out by the following roll call vote: AYES:
Armenta, Clark, Dang, Low and Ly NOES: None.
5. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER & STAFF - None
6. MATTERS FROM MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
A. Senate Bill 1383 Organic Waste Reductions Policy and Programs Development
and Implementation
On July 13, 2021, the City Council discussed Senate Bill 1383 statute, which
imposes significant organic and recycling waste reduction requirements to existing
City waste collection policy and programs. Cities are responsible for implementing
Senate Bill 1383 regulations in their communities and must coordinate with
relevant county agencies, waste haulers, waste processing facilities, recyclers,
commercial businesses, residents, and edible food recover organizations. In the
same discussion, the City Council made a motion asking the City's existing
Franchise Hauler to submit a proposal to address and achieve compliance with
Senate Bill 1383 during the existing term of their agreement.
Recommendation: That the City Council direct staff to proceed with the following:
1. That the City Council accept the proposal submitted by Republic Services
to achieve compliance with Senate Bill 1383 during the existing term of
agreement; or
2. The City retain an independent oversight through the procurement of a
consultant to develop, implement, and administer Senate Bill 1383 Organic
Waste Reduction Program at a cost of $65,000 for year one. This expense is
not included in the 2021-2022 adopted operating budget. Therefore, if this
option is selected, a budget amendment will be necessary. The amendment will
be presented with the V Quarter Budget Report.
City Manager Molleda reported that Senate Bill 1383 imposes significant organic
and recycling waste reduction requirements to existing City waste collection
policies and programs. In a prior meeting discussion, the City Council asked the
City's existing Franchise Hauler to submit a proposal to address and achieve
compliance with Senate Bill 1383 during the existing term of their agreement.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 6 of 17
The following public comments were received via email
Resident Barbra Murphy asked what the money was for and if the $65,000 was a
set fee or negotiable. Will the residents and businesses see an increase in monthly
charges, or will the City pay this from the general fund? Does the state offer any
funding to offset the cost of the program? Will residents receive new containers
like neighboring cities? Lastly, she asked if city staff have contacted other cities
about handling compliance with SB 1383.
Resident Brian Lewin suggested the City partake in the independent option to have
a third party provide and implement the program to keep the program separate from
the party providing the service. He stated that the third -party option will keep the
provider from having a financial stake. Lastly, he opined that if the city chooses to
bid on the trash service, it will provide transparency to the public, and there would
still be continuity with the program.
Council Member Ly made a motion to accept the proposal from Republic Services
Council Member Armenta asked if Republic Services would be presenting.
Mayor Low stated she did not believe there was a plan for Republic Services to
present on this item.
ACTION: Moved by Council Member Ly and seconded by Council Member Clark
to accept the proposal submitted by Republic Services to achieve compliance with
Senate Bill 1383 during the existing term of agreement; The motion was carried out
by the following roll call vote AYES: Armenta, Clark, Dang, Low and Ly
NOES: None.
Council Member Armenta stated there is a potential two-year bill being proposed
regarding SB 1383 to see if cities have a bigger chance to comply.
B. Citation and Parking Discussion
This item is presented to the City Council at the request of Council Member
Sandra Armenta. She would like to discuss this issue regarding citations issued and
parking enforcement matters.
Recommendation: That the City Council discuss and provide further direction.
Council Member Armenta stated she received an email from City Manager Molleda
on September 13, 2021, stating that after speaking with Mayor Low, the items
would be on the agenda for the City Council meeting for further discussion. Mrs.
Armenta expressed concern with how protocol on questions she asked would now
be agendize going forward. She asked for clarification on how items should be
placed on the agenda for council discussion.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 7 of 17
Council Member Ly explained his conversation with Mayor Low about the items.
He acknowledged there was tension between Council Member Armenta and City
Manager Molleda. As such, meetings took place to place measures and procedures
that would work to make sure Mrs. Armenta's questions would be answered. He
stated that if there is an impasse between the City Manager and a Council Member,
then the matter should be placed at a City Council meeting for discussion.
Council Member Armenta began to address Council Member Ly's statement and
agreed there have been conversations on her expectations and asks.
City Attorney Richman interjected and explained that the initial question posed by
Council Member Armenta, asking about the protocol regarding adding items to the
agenda, was answered by Council Member Ly. She requested that the items
presented on the agenda be discussed and advised Council Member Armenta to
verbalize her concerns during her council comments.
Council Member Armenta stated that Rosemead School District Board Member
John Quintanilla and Superintendent Alex Ruvalcava asked City Manager Molleda
if the City would waive any citations during street sweeping on the first day of
school for their schools in the district. Mrs. Armenta stated it was brought to her
attention that a Rosemead School District teacher was cited. She asked City
Manager Molleda to look into the citation and has continuously asked for updates
on the matter, which Mrs. Armenta had yet to receive.
Mayor Low asked for clarification on what Council Member Armenta's request
was to City Manager Molleda.
Council Member Armenta stated her request was whether or not the school district
superintendent had reached out to City Manager Molleda, asking to waive citations
on the first day of school and asked City Manager Molleda to look into the citation
issued to a teacher on the first day of school and provide updates to her.
Council Member Ly asked for clarification on what is being asked of City Manager
Molleda.
Council Member Armenta explained she had repeatedly asked for an update on a
citation, whether or not it would be waived, to City Manager Molleda. She stated
she was looking for an update, not items to be added to the agenda.
Mayor Low asked if Mrs. Armenta's question to City Manager Molleda was
regarding the City ever waiving citations.
Council Member Armenta stated that she asked about the issue status or resolution.
Council Member Clark stated her concern was the lack of communication. Council
Member Clark explained that the superintendent had reached out to City Manager
Molleda, and Council Member Armenta had yet to receive an answer from City
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 8 of 17
Manager Molleda. Council Member Clark asked why there was no communication
from City Manager Molleda.
Mayor Low asked City Manager Molleda to respond.
City Manager Molleda stated she spoke to Garvey and Rosemead School District,
and both schools asked for no citations given the first week of classes. The ticket
issued was put through the appeal process and eventually waived. City Manager
Molleda stated the ticket recipient was notified of the waived citation.
Council Member Clark asked City Manager Molleda why she did not communicate
the update of the citation to Council Member Armenta.
City Manager Molleda stated she did not have a response
Mayor Low stated the citation was waived.
Council Member Ly stated the Council should not be setting policies on issues that
are well within the authority of the City Manager and to resolve the situations and
allow as part of the City's code or general policy to be continued as such. He opined
that because of the impasse of communication between the City Manager and
Council Member Armenta, items should be placed on the agenda if they are not
resolved before then.
Council Member Clark stated she does not believe the issue is whether or not the
Council decides if the City should cite on the first week of school. The issue was
that a Councilmember reached out to the City Manager to see if citations were
waived on the first week of school, and no response was given to the
Councilmember.
Council Member Ly stated Council Member Armenta and City Manager Molleda
have had textual conversations but have yet to speak verbally on addressing these
issues.
City Attorney Richman advised that the discussion remain on parking and citations,
not the City Manager's communication with Council Member Armenta.
Council Member Armenta stated that the public would be under the assumption that
she added the items to the agenda, when it was added by the City Manager.
Council Member Clark asked what happened to the citation
Council Member Ly stated the City Manager explained the citation was waived,
and the recipient was given notice.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang stated there are instructions on the back of the citation with
whom to contact, such as payment, appeals, etc. He explained that if residents have
questions, they may follow the instructions at the back of the citation.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 9of17
Mayor Low agreed and suggested advising residents to follow instructions on the
back of citations.
Council Member Armenta clarified that there was an arrangement made between
the City Manager and the School District. The situation would have been different
if a resident had received a citation and then came to the Council to address the
issue.
C. Rosemead Park Walking Trail Discussion
This item is presented to the City Council at the request of Council Member
Sandra Armenta. She would like to discuss the Rosemead Park Walking Trail.
Recommendation: That the City Council discuss and provide further directions.
The following comment was received via email.
Resident Barbara Murphy stated she visited the newly renovated City of Covina
Park and suggested the City contact the contractors for the Covina Park to fix
Rosemead Park Walking Trail, and inquire about the cost.
Council Member Armenta stated that Rosemead High School and the Rosemead
Park Walking Trail were of the same material. Rosemead High School had to
resurface its track and found the same material used in the walking trail to renovate
their track. City staff were told that the material was no longer available when the
City wanted to renovate the walking trail. The options to fix the renovated walking
trail presented to the City Council could cost a million dollars to remove a top layer
when it would have cost less than $400,000 to remove the top layer and rebuild
some of the subbases in some areas. She asked if we need to consider how long the
walking trail's longevity will last. Reminded the Council that a petition by residents
to fix the walking trail was submitted. Asked if Transtech oversees the day-to-day
projects, why did they oversee the walking trail project.
City Manager Molleda stated this was a smaller Capital Improvement Project (CIP)
for Transtech, which was included in their current contract.
Council Member Armenia stated that a possible plan could be contacting El Monte
Union High School District to ask what was done at Rosemead High School track.
She noted the school replaced pieces that needed to be replaced versus the entire
track. The cost for the improvements was a third of what was originally paid. She
stated for the record that in two to five years, the renovated Rosemead Park Walking
Trail will need to be replaced again. The way it is deteriorating and puddling on the
surface, the trail will not last.
Mayor Low asked what Council Member Armenta's ask was.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 10 of 17
Council Member Armenta asked if anything else was going to be done to the trial
based on the three options provided to the City Council at a previous meeting. The
first option was to resurface the walking trail, removing the top layer and replacing
it with old material from the previous fixtures, which would cost nearly a million
dollars. She stated another option was to add another layer; however, this could be
a trip hazard. She also noted another option was to leave the Rosemead Park
Walking Trail as is. She recalled from the City Council meeting there would be
research done. Council Member Armenta asked what the status of the process of
the Rosemead Park Walking Trail was.
Council Member Ly stated he recalls the three options presented at the Council
meeting, and unless something came up that was not considered, this was a closed
situation with no further action needed. He also stated there may be a
misinterpretation of the Council's final desire; he stated what Council Member
Armenta is stating is very different from what was said at the Council meeting.
Mayor Low stated it may be unclear what was said and interpreted at the prior
Council meeting whether or not staff was going to continue to look into other
options besides the three presented. Mayor Low stated that of the two options
presented, one being resurfacing the Rosemead Park trail for a million dollars and
the other being a hazard to the public, and neither would work. She stated that the
only option was to keep the Rosemead Park Walking Trail as is.
Council Member Armenta stated her understanding of the prior City Council
meeting was that City staff would look for other options. She asked City Manager
Molleda what other options were and for updates.
Council Member Ly stated the Council must look at what is City priority, and he
asked the City Council if the walking trail is a high-level priority project.
Council Member Armenta questioned how many new Capital Improvement
Projects there are and how many were old projects. She stated the project has
priority and believed not many new Capital Improvement Projects are underway.
She then asked where staff time was being spent.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang reiterated focusing on the Rosemead Park Walking Trail
topic, as instructed by the city attorney. He stated that there may not be a favorable
option and asked that staff respond to Council Member Armenta's question in the
weekly update.
Mayor Low stated she wanted to give staff a clear direction.
Council Member Ly stated that the Capital Improvement Projects are either design -
ready or shovel -ready, which is why they are on the CIP list. He said there is no
project for the walking trail. Indicating the walking trail project was completed
already. Council Member Ly then stated the fixed options were presented to the
City Council and were cost -prohibitive, thus pausing the process. He then stated
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 11 of 17
that if the City Council gave staff a specific project, a project would be on the CIP
list.
Mayor Low stated that considering staff did their research, that was the reason the
three options were presented.
Council Member Ly stated staff did their research and was vetted by the Parks
Commission.
Mayor Low stated that there is an option to keep conducting research if more than
the other two options are needed.
Council Member Ly advised giving better direction if more research is needed.
Council Member Armenta stated she would like staff to contact either Rosemead
High School or El Monte Union High School District to discuss how their walking
strip was fixed and the steps taken. She asked if staff could look into fixing the top
layer of the walking trail strip.
Mayor Low interjected that Council Member Armenta was asking two different
questions. Mayor Low stated she wanted to give staff clear direction. She reiterated
that Council Member Armenta asked to direct City staff to reach out to El Monte
Union High School to understand how they replaced sections of their walking trail.
The second question of Council Member Armenta's questions was a different topic.
Council Member Armenta asked that City staff asked El Monte Union High School
or Rosemead High School about the steps they took to fix their walking trail. She
stated she would like to see the research to decide what action is needed.
Council Member Ly stated the first question was answered. He noted the City
looked at different bids of what it would cost to replace or add another layer on top.
Council Member Armenta stated she would like a different opinion. She said she
needed to understand how taking off the top layer of the walking trail would cost
more than actually resurfacing the walking trail. She stated she would like to see
data that shows the numbers.
Mayor Low asked Council Member Armenta if she was asking staff for the cost
only to remove or replace the top layer of the current trail.
Council Member Armenta replied yes.
Mayor Low stated she was under the impression that Council Member Armenta's
ask was to replace the current top layer of the walking trail. She then asked Council
Member Armenta if she did not accept the cost provided but asked for a cost
breakdown.
Council Member Armenta confirmed the mayor's comment.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 12 of 17
Mayor Low asked Council Member Armenta if her request was about calculating
the cost.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang stated he remembered asking about the dollar figure and
explained that the cost is a million dollars because taking the rubber material off
would require breaking the pan. Once the pan is broken, there are steps towards
putting the gravel, and then placing the rubber system is what adds to a million
dollars.
Council Member Armenta stated that breaking the pan was unnecessary after
talking to Chris Marcarello, the person in charge of the walking trail in the past.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang asked that staff look into other options besides the three
covered. He also stated that if staff cannot come up with other options, the City
Council should accept that. The City Council should uphold consultants and
professional engineers who have technical expertise.
Council Member Armenta stated that the Council was given incorrect information;
she stated that she was told the retention was paid. This brought up red flags, and
she asked what other information was incorrect.
Mayor Low reiterated Mayor Pro Tem Dang's point regarding explaining how the
cost was broken down.
Council Member Ly stated he feels uncomfortable telling staff to find another
solution. He noted the option should be coming from the City staffs
recommendation. He also stated that if there is a second ask of Council Member
Armenta, that needs to be the conversation going forward.
Council Member Armenta clarified her second ask, stating she would like City staff
to look for another option. She stated she would also like City staff to find other
methods to rectify the drainage causing damage in the walking trail strip.
Mayor Low asked if this is a high priority or not.
Council Member Armenta stated she believed this was a high priority. She said that
a week after the reconstruction of the walking trail, there was a petition to fix it.
She stated residents used this as a form of exercise, some of which only had the
exercise of the walking trail during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Mayor Low suggested a time limit or budget for the research time staff would take
to conduct.
Council Member Ly suggested appointing a sub -committee. He suggested the sub-
committee have 60 days to conduct an analysis and return what they have collected
after the 60 days.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 13 of 17
Mayor Low agreed with the idea of a subcommittee and imposing a time limit. She
did not want an ongoing research project.
Council Member Armenta agreed with Council Member Ly, appointing a sub-
committee. She stated she would like someone from the Parks Commission and
herself to sit on the sub -committee.
Council Member Ly asked City Manager Molleda when the new Director of Public
Works was set to start.
City Manager Molleda stated the new Public Works Director was set to start on
October 4, 2021.
Council Member Ly suggested the Council give the new Director of Public Works
time to settle into the role before requesting the sub -committee to meet.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang stated staff have already done their research. He was okay
with looking for other options outside of the options provided.
Council Member Armenta stated that City staff were not taking extra time
researching the problem since the research had already been done.
Council Member Ly stated the new Director of Public Works may not be up to
speed on the data. He also said Transtech's role would be project management and
project engineering of projects in the city, not the day-to-day projects of Public
Works. Asked how much time the Council wants to use for the new Director of
Public Works to conduct more research.
Mayor Low stated the City Council should ensure a start time for the new Director
of Public Works to give him time to research. She did not want this to be a
continuous project but rather a project with a time limit. She went on to say that
once the Director of Public Works has settled in, a time limit for the project will
begin.
Council Member Armenta agreed with Mayor Low and echoed having a start time
for the new Director of Public Works. She also stated that Transtech was the project
manager for the walking trail and asked why Transtech would not have the research
needed to begin working on the walking trail.
Mayor Low stated that Transtech is a professional company that would be able to
help.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang stated the best perimeter to set is to have a concrete pan and
call companies willing to put a rubberized system over the pan and give you a
warranty. He also explained from the prior research conducted that no vendors were
willing to certify the method of fixing the walking trail with the spongy material.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang stated he believed what Council Member Armenta was trying
to convey was to remove the entire walking strip if feasible.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 14 of 17
Mayor Low explained that Council Member Armenta wanted to remove a portion
of the walking strip.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang stated the walking strip is not a thick layer, explaining
removing more than half of the walking strip would cost more.
Council Member Armenta stated she believed a sub -committee could find more
options than the three options already presented to the Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang stated he would like to look at the cost value of whatever
ideas the potential sub -committee comes up with but would like a warranty on it.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang asked if 30 days after the Director of Public Works starts was
sufficient to start the 60 -day time frame for conducting research.
Council Member Ly stated there is a second council meeting in October, leaving
enough time for staff and a Council Member, along with the new Director of Public
Works, to conduct a time frame for the project and decide who will be selected for
the sub -committee.
City Attorney Richman clarified the Council's direction to bring back the item for
the October 14 meeting, a discussion on creating a subcommittee to look into the
Rosemead Park Walking Trail.
D. Parent Engagement Institute Program Discussion
This item is presented to the City Council at the request of Council Member
Sandra Armenia. She would like to discuss the Parent Engagement Institute
program.
Recommendation: That the City Council discuss and provide further direction
Council Member Armenia asked if City staff had contacted the Parent Engagement
Institute for other available options. She asked what programs were being
conducted in the former Public Works building at Garvey Park.
Mayor Low stated she was uncomfortable giving a City facility to use to an
organization. She stated she believed the public would question why a Rosemead
facility is being offered to an organization and be seen as unfair.
Council Member Ly stated his interpretation of the Council's action was to go with
the Director of Parks and Recreation Boecking's plan for the former Public Works
facility. He believed there was no further action. He stated if the Council wanted to
look into an option for the Parent Engagement Institute, the Council would have to
provide directions of what the Council would like city staff to do if a collaboration
is wanted.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 15 of 17
Council Member Annenta stated partnerships with the Boys and Girls Club, and
YMCA are no longer a potential option in response to Mayor Low's comment about
not feeling comfortable giving an organization a city facility.
Maylor Low stated this was a possibility.
Council Member Anmenta stated she respected Mayor Low's opinion. She also
noted that programs like the YMCA and Boys and Girls Club would no longer be
able to enter the City's facilities. The programs would have been allowed into the
city and not charged the City to conduct their programs. She stated she wanted to
find the best use of vacant buildings to hold programs for the children.
Council Member Ly asked for an update on how programs are being run at the
former Public Works building and the progress of the events.
Director of Parks and Recreation Boecking stated nine weeks of summer camp
program were conducted. An after-school drop-in program runs Monday to Friday
from 3 pm -5 pm and on Wednesdays from 2 pm -5 pm. He explained there is
prepping for a Teen Center and hopes the Teen Center will be up and running by
November. In addition, he stated the Playschool Program will be starting in
November and run Monday -Thursday from 8:30 am to 11:30 am. Furthermore,
there is a plan for programming with additional classes and workshops; he relayed
that the staff is looking into adding music, art, and possibly a Lego class. Lastly,
the department has opened the facility for youth non-profit groups to hold meetings.
Council Member Armenta thanked the Director of Parks and Recreation Boecking,
answering her questions on what programs were being held at the former Public
Works facility.
Council Member Ly asked Mayor Low if the Council was providing any direction
for the Parent Engagement Institute Program.
Council Member Armenta answered Council Member Ly's question, stating no.
She explained that she asked what programs were being conducted, emphasizing
that she did not put the topic on the agenda.
Council Member Ly asked if the City Council would give more direction to staff
on the Parent Engagement Institute Program or if the matter is considered done.
Council Member Armenta stated the matter was done, explaining her questions
were answered. She noted the Parent Engagement Institute is on the agenda because
the City Manager placed them on the agenda instead of answering her directly.
Council Member Clark asked why the City Manager did not answer Council
Member Armenta's questions directly.
Council Member Ly stated City Attorney Richman already addressed the Council
to discuss only what is on the agenda.
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 16 of 17
7
City Attorney Richman stated she is keeping the Council aligned with the Brown
Act.
E. Council Comments
Council Member Clark reported that she attended the Contract Cities conference.
Council Member Armenta also reported that she also attended the Contract Cities
conference. She requested a reevaluation of the City Manager at a later time.
Council Member Ly stated this was his last in-person meeting before taking
military leave. He wished the City Council good luck.
Mayor Pro Tem Dang thanked City staff and Republic Services for the Quality -of -
Life Cleanup efforts. He applauded Director of Parks and Recreation Boecking
on the idea of the Pumpkin Dive.
Mayor Low stated she also attended Contract Cities conference and thanked
Temple City Sheriff Station for their work with people experiencing homelessness
and dealings with mental health.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Low adjourned the special meeting to continue the Closed Session discuss of item
1B at 9:21 p.m. The City Council adjourned the Closed Session meeting at 2:30 a.m.
with no reportable action. The next regular meeting will be held on October 12, 2021,
at 7:00 p.m. in the Rosemead City Hall Council Chamber.
Ericka Hernandez, ity
APPROVED:
Ste n Ly, Mayor
Rosemead City Council Special Meeting
Minutes of September 29, 2021
Page 17 of 17