CC - 1965 - 96 - Vacation a Portion of Whitmore Street9
•
RESOLUTION NO. 65-96
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROSEMEAD ORDERING THE VACATION
OF A PORTION OF WHITMORE STREET.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemead
did on November 23, 1965 adopt Resolution No. 65-91 entitled
"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rosemead
Expressing the intention to Vacate a Portion of Whitmore
Street and Setting the Time and Place for a Public Hearing
Thereon," and
WHEREAS, the said City Council did hold a public
hearing thereon on December 28, 1965 at 8:00 p.m, at 8815
East Valley Boulevard, City of Rosemead, State of California,
at which time said Council did hear all evidence offered by
persons interested in said vacation, and no persons were
present to protest same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemead
does hereby find that the portion of Whitmore Street as
described and referred to in said Resolution No. 65-91 is
unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That portion of Whitmore Street, formerly
unnamed street, 0 feet wide, as shown on map of E. J. Baldwins.
First Subdivision, in the City of Rosemead, County of Los
Angeles, State of California, recorded in Book 66, pages
91, and 95, of Miscellaneous Records, in the office of the
Recorder of said county, and that portion of Whitmore Street,
as shown on and dedicated by map of Tract No. 20264, in said.
city, recorded in Book 541, pages 28 and 29, of Maps, in the
office of said recorder, which lie within the following
described boundaries:
Beginning at the northerly terminus of the straight line in
the westerly boundary of Lot 38, said tract, for the purpose
of this description said straight line has a bearing of North
114026'15" West, said northerly terminus being the beginning
of a curve concave to the east, tangent to said straight line
and having a radius of 100 feet; tence northerly along said
curve through a central angle of 19 53101" a distance of 3.29
feet; thence North 12033'14" West 27.89 feet to the beginning
of a curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 55
feet, tangent to said last mentioned course and tangent to
a line parallel with and 55 feet northerly, measured at right
angles, from the straight line in the northerly boundary of
said lot; thence northwesterly along said last mentioned
curve 50.92 feet to the northerly line of Whitmore Street,
50 feet wide, as shown on map of said tract; thence easterly
along said northerly line to the southwesterly boundary of
that certain 75 foot strip of land described in deed to Los
Angeles County Flood Control District, for Rubio Wash,
recorded on August 13, 1936, in Book 14285, page 386, of
Official Records, in the office of said recorder; thence
southeasterly along said southwesterly boundary to the
northeasterly corner of said lot; thence westerly, southwest-
erly and southerly along the northerly, northwesterly and
westerly boundaries of said lot to the point of beginning,
shall be and is hereby vacated, subject to the reservations
and exceptions provided in Section 2 hereof.
0 0
Section 2. The City Council has determined that the
public convenience and necessity require the reservation of
permanent easements.and rights of way for ingress and egress
to Rubio hash for channel maintenance and for all existing
franchises and renewals thereof pursuant to Streets and
Highways Code Sections 8330 and 8331, and such permanent
easements and rights of way are hereby reserved and excepted.
Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of
Rosemead siFa T cause a certified copy of this Resolution
and order to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of
the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of
December, 1965.
MAYOR OF THE CITY AD
ATTEST:
RK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD )
I, EDYTHE C. ARMSTRONG, City Clerk of the City of
Rosemead, do hereby certify that the whole number of members
of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
resolution, being Resolution No. 65-96, was duly.and
regularly introduced before and adopted by the City Council
of said City at a regular meeting of said Council, duly and
regularly held on the 28th day of December, 1965, and that
the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen: Andersen, Jackman, Lowrey,
Maude, Stead.
NOES: Councilmen: None.
ABSENT: Councilmen: None.
CITY CLERK 0 THE CITY R EM AD
- 2 -