Loading...
CC - 1995-09 - Approving Tenetatice Parcel Map 24045 7 Zone Varience 94-266• RESOLUTION 95-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP CASE NO. 24045 AND ZONE VARIANCE NO. 94-266, SUBDIVIDING ONE LOT INTO TWO WITH A REDUCED LOT WIDTH (45-FEET) AND ONE REDUCED SIDE YARD SETBACK (3-FEET) AT 9318 RALPH STREET, ROSEMEAD (AP#8594-014-020). WHEREAS, Mr. Mike Yoakum, Owner/Applicant, 1274 E. Center Court, Covina, CA 91724 has requested to subdivide 9318 Ralph Street into two lots to create a vacant lot separate from an existing single family home; and WHEREAS, 9318 Ralph Street is located within the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zone; and WHEREAS, section 66410 et sea of the California Government Code (Subdivision Map Act) and Chapter 9200 of the Rosemead Municipal Code (RMC) set guidelines for subdividing land; and WHEREAS, Section 9104.4 RMC requires lots in the R-1 zone to maintain interior side yards at a minimum of five (5) feet and the project proposes a new side yard of an existing single family home to be three (3) feet; and WHEREAS, Section 9104.7 RMC requires the minimum lot width to be fifty (50) feet at the front property line and the second lot is proposed to be 45 feet wide; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 1994, 58 notices were mailed to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property specifying the date, time and location of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, on October 17, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 94-24 denying Tentative Parcel Map No. 24045 and Zone Variance No. 94-266; and WHEREAS, on October 26, 1994, Mr. Mike Yoakum filed a written request with the City Clerk for the City Council to consider an appeal of the 10-17-94 Planning Commission decision; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 1995 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing and sufficiently considered all testimony in order to make the following determination. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Rosemead City Council as follows: Section 1. The City Council HEREBY DETERMINES that Tentative Parcel Map No. 24045 is a minor land division (Class 15) and Variance No. 94-266 is a minor alteration in land use limitations (Class 5) which are Categorically Exempt from environmental review under Section 15315 and 15305, respectively, of the California Environmental Quality Act ordinance City environmental guidelines. Section 2. The City Council HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that facts do exist to justify approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 24045 in accordance with Section 9412 of the Rosemead Municipal code as follows: A. The proposed division will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in the immediate vicinity. 1 • • FINDING: The site is in an urban area that is primarily built out. Infrastructure and improvements exist to support existing development. This property is zoned R-1 which would allow up to one unit per 6,000 square feet of property. The property totals about 18,000 square feet which would allow up to three (3) units. However, the subdivision will restrict development to one (1) unit on each of the two (2) lots. Existing infrastructure is adequate to support the addition of one (1) unit. Conditions have been attached to reduce any potential impacts to a level of insignificance. B. The proposed division will not be contrary to any official plan adopted by the City Council of the City of Rosemead; or to any official policies or standards adopted by the City Planning Commission or the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk at or prior to the time of filing of the applicaiton hereunder. FINDING: Single family residential development is consistent with the general plan designation of low density residential. There is no specific plan for this area. The proposed development meets all minimum development standards in accordance with the Rosemead Municipal Code. A Zone Variance No. 94-266 has been approved to allow a reduced side yard for the existing single family home to allow the maximum amount of developable space (451) on the newly created lot. C. Each proposed parcel conforms in area and dimension to the provisions of zoning and subdivision requirements of the City of Rosemead. FINDING: Zone Variance No. 94-266 is approved under this Resolution to allow a reduced lot width of 45' and reduced side yard of three (3) feet. The proposed project meets the minimum standards with the approval of this variance. Any new development will be required to meet all R-1 single family residential development standards for new constructin. D. All streets, alleys and driveways proposed to serve the property have been dedicated or such dedication is not required for the protection of public safety, health and welfare and that such streets, alleys and driveways are of sufficient width, design and construction to preserve the public safety and to provide adequate access and circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. FINDING: The site is located at 9318 Ralph Street. Ralph Street has a 50-feet public right-of-way which is adequate for residential streets. The area is designated for low density residential development. Therefore, the street is adequate for access and circulation at this site. The existing residence will have the required 2-car garage with a driveway that meets the development standards. Any development of the new lot will be designed to meet the minimum code. E. All easements and covenants required for the approval of the tentative map or plot plan have been duly executed and recorded (Section 9412). FINDING: No easements and/or covenants are necessary for either of these two lots. Section 3. The City Council FURTHER FINDS AND DETERMINES that facts do exist to justify approving Variance No. 94-266 in accordance with Section 9171 of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows: A. The variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. 2 FINDING: Location of the existing residence does not allow the owner to create a new lot with 50 feet of frontage without adversely affecting the existing structure. A reduced side yard is created to maximize the lot width of the new lot. Eleven (11) conditions have been attached. Any new development will be required to meet all development standards. B. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvemnts in such zone or vicinity in which the property is located. FINDING: The reduced side yard is located on side where the new lot has been created. No existing homes will be affected by this variance. This variance does not allow the development of any additional homes. It is simply to preserve the existing home that is in very good condition. C. That because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, locaiton or surroundings, the strict applicaiton of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. FINDING: This site is about 18,000 square feet located in the R-1 zone. By density, up to three (3) units could be built. However, this plan is created to preserve the true intent of single family development by creating a second lot for a single family home. The variances are necessary to preserve the existing home. D. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan. FINDING: The general plan designates this area for low density residential developement. Development of the two lots for single family homes will keep within the intent of this designation. Section 4. The City Council HEREBY APPROVES: (1) Tentative Parcel Map No. 24045, subdividing one lot into two; and (2) Zone Variance 94-266, allowing a reduced lot width of 45 feet instead of 50 feet and a reduced side yard of three (3) feet instead of five (5) feet at 9318 Ralph Street (AP#8594-014-020); subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 5. This action by the Rosemead City Council shall become final and effective immediately upon this appeal decision pursuant to Section 9186.6 of the Rosemead Municipal Code. All interested parties are HEREBY NOTIFIED that the time for challenging this decision by any form of judicial review is governed by Seciton 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the City Council on January 24, 1995, by the following vote: YES: Imperial, Vasquez, Bruesch, Taylor, Clark NO: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day ov br}aexy-,-)1995. ATTEST: I hereby certif that- 5e foregoing Resolution No. 95-09 was duly and regularly adopted by the R" _emead,,CityeCouncil at a regular meeting held on CITY CLERK the 14th day of February, 1995 by the following vote; / Yes:Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez, Imperial No:3None; Absent: None; Abstain: None CITY CLERK EXHIBIT A PARCEL MAP 24045 and ZONE VARIANCE 94-266 9318 RALPH STREET CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL JANUARY 24, 1995 1. That the property be developed in accordance with Parcel Map 24045, marked Exhibit B. 2. The project shall comply with the conditions as set forth in the City Engineer's report dated 8-9-94, and the Fire Department's recommendations dated 5-6-94. All conditions shall be completed to the City Engineer's and Director of Planning's satisfaction prior to recordation of the final map. 3. The interior property line of the newly created lots, and where designated by the Director of Planning, the perimeter property line, shall be fenced with a six-foot (61) high masonry or wooden fence ending at the rear of the dwelling unit on Lot 1. If a wooden fence is installed, the fence shall be supported by steel posts set in concrete. Said fence shall be installed prior to recordation of the parcel map or at the time of issuance of building permit be made a matter of condition'. All masonry walls shall have finished surface on both sides. 4. All utilities shall be underground including appropriate wiring for Cable Television. 5. The property shall be kept cleared of weeds, debris and abandoned vehicles, and maintained to the L.A. County Fire and Health codes until it is developed. All trash shall be contained in dumpsters and removed on an as-needed basis. No trash shall be visible from outside the dumpster. Surplus construction materials shall be stored so as to be screened from view when not actually in use. 6. This map shall be finaled and recorded within two (2) years of tentative approval. Failure to do so may result in the map's expiration and the need for another tentative map application. Any request for extension must be submitted, in writing, together with ten (10) copies of the map and corresponding plans, to the Planning Department before the expiration date. 7. The conditions listed on this Exhibit shall be copied directly onto development plans submitted to the Planning and Building Departments for review. 8. Construction activities shall be limited to take place between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any legal holidays. 9. A 6' high fence, composed of chain link or other approved material, shall totally enclose the perimeter of the property when vacant, under construction, or under demolition, and said fence shall remain until Occupancy is granted. 10. That the existing garage, carport and concrete driveway on the proposed property line be removed. 11. The applicant shall sign an affidavit of agreement, and return it to the Planning Department within ten (10) days after approval of this request. WPM24045