CC - 1994-50 - Denying Zone changeRESOLUTION NO. 94-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROSEMEAD DENYING BOTH A ZONE
CHANGE REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO P-D
AND THE ACCOMPANYING DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8723-8729
MISSION DRIVE, ROSEMEAD (ZONE CHANGE
CASE 93-198)
Section 1. The City Council finds, determines and declares:
(a) An application for a change of zone was duly filed by the
property owner for property located at 8723 through 8729 Mission
Drive and more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference; and
(b) A public hearing was held before the Rosemead Planning
Commission on August 1, 1994, at which time the Commission
recommended approval of the zone change request and development.plan;
and
(c) That on September 13, 1994, the City Council held a duly
noticed public hearing on the zone change request and development
plan; and
(d) Pursuant to Section 9120.15 of the Rosemead Municipal Code,
the previously approved development plan for the property at 8723
through 8729 Mission Drive is null and void on account of the failure
to implement the plan within one year of its approval in 1990.
Section 2. The City Council has considered the proposed
Negative Declaration together with all comments, both written and
oral, received during the public review and public hearing process.
The City Council hereby approves the Negative Declaration for Zone
Change 93-198 with the finding that there is no substantial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
The approval of the Negative Declaration is made upon the basis of
the Initial Study, all comments received and staff responses to
comments.
Section 3. The City Council hereby denies Zone Change 93-198
and further denies the development plan that accompanied the Zone
Change Request. The City Council finds and determines that while the
P-D ordinance is designed to allow deviations from the established
zoning development standards to obtain quality large-scale projects,
this particular project has too many small lots and does not provide
sufficient enhancements in terms of common-use amenities that would
justify said small lots.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution and cause the same to be processed according to State law.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the gosee~C' y Council on this
11th day of October, 1994. /1
ATTEST:
7C_.ty Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
No. 94-50 was duly and regularly -adopted
by the Rosemead City Council at a regular
meeting held on the 11th day of October,
1994, by the following vote:
Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez, Imperial
No: None; Absent: None; Abstain: None
r .:.t CIr
A•-J5-40••
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ZONE CHANGE 93-198
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Being a subdivision of:
0
Lots 67 and 68, in the City of Rosemead, County of Los
Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book
5389, Page 10 of Maps, in the office of the Los Angeles
County Recorder.
E:35-40:16