Loading...
RRA - 02-13-01• • APPRO v ED CITY OF IZ SEbiEAD DATE S o8 0/ "y e 2A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FEBRUARY 13, 2001 The regular meeting of the Rosemead Redeveopment Agency was called to order by Chairman Clark at 7:00 p.m. in the conference room of City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. The Pledge to the Flag was led by Agencymember Bruesch The Invocation was led by Agencymember Taylor ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: Present: Agencymembers Bruesch, Vasquez, Taylor, and Chairman Clark Absent: Imperial - excused APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JANUARY 23, 2001 -REGULAR MEETING MOTION BY AGENCYMEM 3ER TAYLOR, SECOND BY AGENCYMEMBER BRUESCH that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 23, 2001, be approved as submitted. Vote resulted: Aye: B ruesch, Vasquez, Clark, Taylor No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Item No. 5 will be heard first in deference to the Agency Attorney who has to leave shortly. 5. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR A McDONALD'S RESTAURANT WITH INDOOR PLAY PLACE TO BE LOCATED AT 8548 VALLEY BOULEVARD Frank Tripepi, Executive Director, presented the staff report. Holly Knapp, 8367 E. Whitmore, Rosemead, stated her opposition to the project while reading from her letter addressed to the Agency. Mrs. Knapp stated that she sees the danger of Rosemead becoming the "fast food capital" of the San Gabriel Valley and that Rosemead needs quality restaurants and shopping centers, such as an El Torito or a Target or Walmart. Mrs. Knapp concluded the Agency needs to plan for the City and not just become a rubber stamp for the so called, "market" and to do whatever it takes to stop, look and redevelop our City. Janay Hardiman-Camp, Community Affairs Manager for McDonald's Corporation, stated that McDonald's is not adding a new use to the community, they are proposing the relocate the present McDonald's on Valley Boulevard. Ms. Camp stated that their lease will expire within the next 3 to 4 years,and they will either be looking for new property or to renew their lease. Ms. Camp continued that McDonald's Corporation wants to offer the City a brand new restaurant with an indoor play area. The operator of the existing McDonald's will be operating the new one. Ms. Camp stated that another factor taken into consideration is that the proposed location is further away from residential property lines. Ms. Camp concluded that this is a relocation store and they are simply maintaining the status quo and not adding another fast food restaurant to the community. RRAMIN:2-13-01 Page 9 1 0 • Agencymember Taylor asked about the parking in the leased area and according to the rendering, McDonald's property line is right behind the parking stalls adjoining the restaurant. Mel Cruise, Project Engineer, McDonald's Corporation, explained that the area behind the stalls adjoining the restaurant will be leased with a gain of 35 additional parking stalls, and that the western portion of the property has plans for private development also. McDonald's will lease a portion of that property for the 35 stalls to accommodate and comply with the number of parking stalls required. Agencymember Taylor stated that they are 60% below the parking requirements. Mr. Cruise stated that is why they have applied for a zone variance. Mr. Cruise continued that a parking study was conducted of the McDonald's on Valley and the one in Temple City and concluded that 40 parking stalls are adequate during peak hours. Agencymember Taylor asked what are the leasing arrangements for the rest of the property and how long is the lease? Lisa Johannson, Real Estate Representative for McDonald's Corporation, stated that they have an easement agreement that runs for as long as their lease, which includes shared access to the common area. Ms. Johannson explained that they have a 20-year lease and as long as the restaurant is there, they have rights to the parking area. Agencymember Taylor requested more information about the proposed shopping center on that corner. Mr. Cruise, referring to the triangle shaped lot on the rendering, stated that that is a separate development and will consist of retail/office spaces. Mr. Cruise referred to the area where there will be shared parking with McDonald's. The total square footage of that project will be 24,650 square feet of retail space. Agencymember Taylor asked how many parking spaces will that require? Mr. Cruise replied the requirement is 98 parking spaces, but that the development will have 191 stalls, of which a large amount will be on the McDonald's side as McDonald's is required to provide 87 parking spaces. Some of the parking area of the other project is proposed to span the wash. Mr. Tripepi pointed out that the City does not have a covered wash anywhere. Mr. Tripepi explained that to cover a wash is cost prohibitive and has to meet rigid standards which discourages most developers. However, McDonald's is not part of that project. This is a divided project. Mr. Tripepi cautioned that the McDonald's project does not include any parking on the wash. Agencymember Taylor asked why something as small as this building requires 87 parking spaces. Mr. Tripepi explained that the City has a very strict parking standard, which is I per 50 square feet. Mr. Cruise added that 60% of their business is from the drive through. Agencymember Bruesch stated that McDonald's has always been a good corporate neighbor in Rosemead. However, Mr. Bruesch continued that time and time again he has seen piece meal development. Mr. Bruesch stated that he is not ready to consider this project until the two developers of this property have been given a chance to come up with a co joined development that will not impact parking. RRAMIN:2-13-01 Page n2 • s Chairman Clark stated that she wants to avoid the problems experienced by other cities regarding traffic congestion and lack of parking, and she does not want to set up such a scenario for this corner. Ms. Camp asked if Chairman Clark's concern was that the parking is not sufficient for a McDonald's or looking at the overall parking for the entire development. Agencymember Bruesch stated that it is frustrating working with two developers who say they will develop this property in such a way and never come through. Mr. Bruesch added that this project has leased parking, perhaps parking will be built over the wash, perhaps, perhaps, etc. Mr. Bruesch stated that the two landowners need to develop a total area plan that includes the restaurant and other buildings in a logical and sane manner. Ms. 7ohanssen stated that they are presenting the McDonald's project first because they are ready to move ahead. Ms. Camp stated that this is a phased development project and in discussions with the Planning Department they wanted to ensure that the building will be complimentary and a continuous looking project. Agencymember Taylor requested a 60-day continuance to give the developer a chance to put the entire project together. Ms. Camp stated that she did not know what else they could do with the developer. Ken Rosen, attorney for the developer, stated that the McDonald's will provide a stable base for any other development and does not know if an additional 60 days will make any difference. Mr. Rosen continued that it is their desire to have this project approved first and then develop their project around it. Mr. Rosen stated that there is a covered wash across the street on the San Gabriel side and that it can be done if it is necessary to develop the property. Agencymember Taylor stated that the developer almost has to cover the wash to make this a viable corner. Mr. Taylor referred to the problem parking at Diamond Square and problems with the proposed Eaton Village project. Mr. Taylor continued that he would like a complete proposal in 60-days. Mr. Taylor agreed that this location would be a better location for McDonald's. Agencymember Bruesch pointed out that the location of the entrances presents a dangerous situation for exiting motorists as they will try to make a left-hand turn no matter how many signs or botts dots are installed. Chairman Clark asked staff to look into obtaining appraisals of the property and to consider acquiring those sites. Agencymember Taylor asked what is the Agency going to do with it? Mr. Taylor stated that this is the beginning of the slippery slope he referred to at a prior meeting, which started with the purchase of the Abilene property. Mr. Taylor continued that there is a private developer here ready to do something with that property, let's give him that opportunity. Agencymember Bruesch stated that the Agency needs to have a vision, to see what they want for the future of the City. Mr. Bruesch agreed with the 60-day waiting period and to direct staff to obtain an appraisal on the property. Agencymember Taylor stated that this gives the developer no incentive to work further on the project nor to come back. Mr. Taylor stated that by getting appraisals, it implies that the Agency may purchase the property and do whatever they want with it. Mr. Rosen stated that he does not know what the Agency wants. RRAMIN:2-13-01 Page #3 • s Chairman Clark stated that a resident stated her concerns with a piece meal approach to development and a lack of major restaurants or stores. Mr. Rosen stated that that property has been an eyesore for years. Agencymember Bruesch replied that we have not had a vision for the City, we've let the marketing forces do our visioning and they have done nothing for us. Mr. Bruesch stated that he wants to see a unitary plan for that property plus an appraisal by the City. MOTION BY AGENCYMEMBER BRUESCH, SECOND BY CHAIRMAN CLARK that McDonald's Corporation be given a 60-day continuance and to return with a complete proposal and for staff to obtain an appraisal on the properties. Vote resulted: Yes: Vasquez, Bruesch, Clark, Taylor No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Steve Hunt, 7350 N. Barranca, Glendora, landowner of the proposed McDonald's site requested to speak. Mr. Hunt stated that he is pleased that McDonald's wants to come in and that they do good work for the community. Mr. Hunt stated that he is a Class A Contractor and it is not difficult to put a parking structure over a wash. Mr. Hunt stated that he and his family have owned that property for 40 years and it is not for sale. Agencymember Bruesch stated that so many times the City ends up with an ersatz conglomeration of different styles and uses. Mr. Hunt replied that this is a McDonald's restaurant which is a pillar of the community. Mr. Hunt expressed his disbelief that the Agency would not want a McDonald's at that location. 1. RRA RESOLUTION NO. 2001- CLAIMS AND DEMANDS The following Resolution was presented to the Agency for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-02 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $74,355.37 AND DEMANDS NO. 6200 THROUGH 6221 MOTION BY AGENCYMEMBER TAYLOR, SECOND BY AGENCYMEMBER BRUESCH that the Agency adopt Resolution No. 2001-02. Vote resulted: Yes: Vasquez, Bruesch, Clark, Taylor No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. RRAMIN:2-13-01 Page #4 • • 2. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION GUIDELINES Agencymember Bruesch asked if these guidelines include any design concepts? If not, can they be developed and added. Mr. Tripepi responded that he understands the Agency's frustration with the piece-meal approach. That the properties along Valley Boulevard are haphazard with no rhyme or reason as to how they are parcel mapped, or what the boundary lines are; they are pieces of property owned by numerous owners, lease holders, etc. Mr. Tripepi stated that adoption of the guidelines tonight will allow the Agency to work in conjunction with CDBG to provide additional funds to existing businesses to fix-up and dress-up what they have. Mr. Tripepi continued that the Agency would retain approval of any exterior design. Mr. Tripepi explained that the Agency already has design review in the redevelopment project areas. This program tonight is to provide additional funds to encourage existing businesses to fix-up their exteriors. MOTION BY AGENCYMEM 3ER BRUESCH, SECOND BY AGENCYMEMBER VASQUEZ that the Agency approve and adopt the Redevelopment Agency Commercial Rehabilitation Guidelines and authorize the Executive Director to execute the agreements. Vote resulted: Yes: Vasquez, Bruesch, Clark No: Taylor Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Agencymember Taylor stated that he voted No as too much control will be taken away from the property owners. Frank Tripepi, Executive Director, stated for the record that this is voluntary on the part of the businesses. 3. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT 9143 VALLEY BOULEVARD MOTION BY AGENCYMEMBER BRUESCH, SECOND BY AGENCYMEMBER TAYLOR that the Agency find the project proposal is in conformance with the adopted Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 and direct staff to process the required entitlement applications. Vote resulted: Yes: Vasquez, Bruesch, Clark, Taylor No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. 4. REQUEST FOR A RETAIL/OFFICE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL TO BE LOCATED AT 9400 VALLEY BOULEVARD MOTION BY AGENCYMEMBER TAYLOR, SECOND BY AGENCYMEMBER VASQUEZ that the Agency find the project in conformance with the adopted Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 and direct staff to process the required entitlement applications. Before vote could result, more discussion ensued: Agencymember Bruesch asked if soils remediation has been done on the property as it was formally a dry cleaning establishment. RRAWN:2-13-01 Page u5 s The designer for the project was present and stated that he was not sure whether that had been done or not. Brad Johnson, Planning Director, responded that that property was a City rehab case and the owner was required to do soils remediation about four years ago, that the owner received letters to that effect from the Water Quality Board. However, there is not proof of that in the Planning Department permit packet for that property. Mr. Tripepi stated that permits will not be issued until the soil remediation work is on file. Vote resulted: Yes: Vasquez, Bruesch, Clark, Taylor No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. 6. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD FOR THE FY 2000/01 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE MOTION BY AGENCYMEMBER TAYLOR, SECOND BY AGENCYMEMBER BRUESCH that the Agency approve the Agreement. Vote resulted: Yes: Vasquez, Bruesch, Clark, Taylor No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS - None 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further action to be taken at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Agency Secretary APPROVED: CHAIRM RRAMIN:2-13-01 Page #6