CC - 1993-47 - Denying Zone variance 93-257~ i
RESOLUTION 93-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD DENYING ZONE VARIANCE 93-257 FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 4013 TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD, ROSEMEAD.
Section 1. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
a. The City Council does hereby find and determine that an
application was filed by Earl Scheib of California, Inc. to
construct and operate a spray paint booth closer than the
minimum distance of 200 feet from adjacent residential use
for property located at 4013 Temple City Boulevard.
b. A public hearing was duly held before the Planning
Commission on July 6, 1993, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard,
Rosemead, California; and that notice of the time, date,
place and purpose of the aforesaid hearing was duly given;
and that a public hearing was duly held at the
aforementioned time and place. The Planning Commission
found that facts did not exist based upon Section 9171, et
seq. of the Rosemead Zoning Code which justify the granting
of a zone variance.
C. The City Council, on August 24, 1993, conducted a public
hearing as above on appeal of the Planning commission
decision.
Section 2. The City Council finds:
1. That the applicant has not
that the variance will not
privilege inconsistent with
properties in the M-1 zone in
situated.
2. That such variance will be
public health or welfare or
improvements in such zone or
is located.
sustained his burden of proof
constitute a grant of special
the limitations upon other
which the subject property is
materially detrimental to the
injurious to the property or
vicinity in which the property
3. That the applicant failed to show any special circumstances
applicable to subject property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings that would justify
variance from the strict application of the zoning
ordinance.
4. The subject property is not deprived of privileges enjoyed
by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone
classification.
Section 3. Based on the aforementioned findings, the City
Council hereby denies the zone variance with respect to the property
described in Section 1.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTAb phis 28th day of September,
1993.
" I I 1 J-
MAYOR
I hereby certify that the faregoingf esolotion No.
TTEST: 93-47 was duly and regularly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rosemead at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 28th day of September, 1993, by
!~C/Gt C cam/
-City, Clerk the following vote:
Yes: Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez
No: Clark Absent: McDonald Abstain: None
TY CLERK