Loading...
CC - 1990-42 - The Systems of Highways of the County of Los AngelesRESOLUTION NO. 90-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CONSENTING TO ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PORTIONS OF VALLEY BOULEVARD FROM CHARLOTTE AVENUE TO TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND FROM TEMPLE AVENUE TO FAIRWAY DRIVE/CAMINO DE TEODORO WITHIN SAID CITY AS A PART OF THE SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors did on March 27, 1990 duly adopt a Resolution declaring the portions of Valley Boulevard from Prospect Avenue to Temple City Boulevard and from Temple Avenue to Fairway Drive/Camino de Teodoro, within the Cities of San Gabriel, Rosemead, E1 Monte, Industry, La Puente, West Covina and Walnut, to be a part of the System of Highways of the County of Los Angeles, as provided in Sections 1700 to 1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, said Board of Supervisors by said Resolution requested this Council to give its consent to allow the County to synchronize traffic signals under the Federal-aid Urban (FAU) program and perform appurtenant work within said portions of Valley Boulevard in the City of Rosemead described above; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (c), of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the Secretary of Resources designated this type of project as categorically exempt. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Consent to Inclusion in County Highway System. This City Council does hereby consent to the establishment of the portions of Valley Boulevard from Prospect Avenue to Temple City Boulevard and from Temple Avenue to Fairway Drive/Camino de Teodoro, within the City of Rosemead, as a part of the System of Highways of the County of Los Angeles as provided in Sections 1700 to 1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California Said consent is for the purpose of synchronizing traffic signals and performing appurtenant work as may be necessary by the County of Los Angeles. SECTION 2. Cooperation with Neighboring Jurisdictions. This City Council does hereby consent to cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions to implement, maintain and operate coordinated traffic signal control across jurisdictional boundaries. v SE TION 3. Maintenance and Operation. This City Council does hereby consent to maintain and operate and to finance its jurisdictional share of the maintenance and operations costs of the improvements installed with this project. In order to maintain full effectiveness of these improvements, should the City determine that a change in signal operation for any of the intersections within the project limits within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Rosemead is necessary, the City will coordinate with the County of Los Angeles to ensure that the overall effectiveness of the system is maintained. SECTION 4. Indemnification. This City Council does hereby consent to fully defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County of Los Angeles, its officers, and employees from any liability imposed for injury occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of the City of Rosemead under or in any connection with any work performed with this project. SECTION 5. Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Study and Implementation. This City Council does hereby consent to a study the County of low cost TSM improvements, including, but not limited to, peak hour parking and turn restrictions that can be implemented in conjunction with the project, and also consents to implement all findings from the study found to be feasible and warranted based on engineering criteria and fiscal capacity contingent on Council approval, prior to installation of the improvements. SECTION 6. Finding of Categorical Exemption. This City Council does hereby find that the project is categorically exempt from the requirement for an Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (c), of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. SECTION 7. Finding of a Minor Nature. [Should the City Council find that pursuant to Government Code, Section 65402 (b), the aforesaid improvements are for street improvements of a minor nature, including the following:] This City Council does hereby find that pursuant to Government Code, Section 65402 (b), the aforesaid improvements are for street improvements of a minor nature and that, therefore, the provisions of said Section requiring the submission to and report upon said project by the City Planning Agency do not apply. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rosemead on this 24th day of July, 1990. TY ROSEkKkE~ y L Ct~C.~ Mayor ATTEST: 2GGf City Clerk