CC - Item 6C - Citywide Engineering and Traffic StudyF_1
L
•
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ANDY LAZZARETTO, CITY MANAGE
DATE: MARCH 20, 2006
RE: ADOPTION OF CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC STUDY
Attached for the City Council's consideration is a copy of the 2006 Engineering and Traffic
Study (E & T). The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that cities complete an E & T
survey every five years in order to continue using radar traffic enforcement, but this time is
extended to seven years under certain circumstances. The last survey was adopted in
1999.
The attached report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC,
flowing procedures outlined in the 2003 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD), the 2004 MUTCD California Supplement and as required by Section 627 of the
CVC; and is intended to satisfy the requirements of CVC Section 40802 to enable the
continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.
Forty-two selected street segments were studied. The posted speed limits on each
segment are recommended to remain unchanged from that which is currently posted.
Attached is Table 1 of the report that lists a complete summary of recommendations.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the Engineering and Traffic Study.
Attachment
-
Summary of Re
commendat
ions
Posted
Speed C
ritical
Recommended
No.
Street
From
To
Limit S
peed
Speed Limit
Comments
1
DE ADELENA STREET ROSEMEAD BLVD
ELLIS LANE
30
32
30
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
2
DEL MAR AVENUE
GRAVES AVENUE
GARVEY AVENUE
35/25*•
38
35/25**
3
DEL MAR AVENUE
GARVEY AVENUE
HELLMAN AVENUE
40
42
40
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
4
EARLSWOOD DRIVE
IVAR AVENUE
ROSEMEAD PLACE
30
30
30
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
5
ELLIS LANE
OLNEY STREET
TEMPLE CITY BLVD
30
32
30
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
6
EMERSON PLACE
NEW AVENUE
SAN GABRIEL BLVD
30/25**
32
30/25**
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
7
ENCINITA AVENUE
MISSION ROAD
LOWER AZUSA ROAD
30/25**
32
30125**
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
8
GARVEY AVENUE
WEST CITY LIMIT
DEL MAR AVENUE
35
38
35
`
9
GARVEY AVENUE
DEL MAR AVENUE
SAN GABRIEL BLVD
35
39
35
10
GARVEY AVENUE
SAN GABRIEL BLVD
WALNUT GROVE
35
38
35
AVENUE
11
GARVEY AVENUE
WALNUT GROVE
EAST CITY LIMIT
35
39
35
AVENUE
12
GRAND AVENUE
CHARLOTTE AVENUE
ROSEMEAD BLVD
35
38
35
13
HELLMAN AVENUE
NEW AVENUE
WALNUT GROVE
30
33
30
•
AVENUE
14
JACKSON AVENUE
GRAVES AVENUE
GARVEY AVENUE
30/25**
35
30/25*`
•
See -Segments With Special Conditions" Section for Comments
" = 25 mph when children are present
•
•
Engineering and Traffic Survey
8 City of Rosemead
r
•
T
rY'`~~ C. ~u5>LtrtSt
4t'v ¢ Y A 1, .
L}J1 ~~SjY~I, ~T.3f a.
of Rec
ommend
ations
Posted
Speed
Critical
Recommended
•
To
Limit
Speed
Speed Limit
Comments
15
LOFTUS STREET
TEMPLE CITY BLVD
EAST CITY LIMIT
35
39
35
`
16 LOWER AZUSA ROAD ROSEMEAD BLVD
ENCINITA AVENUE
40/25**
42
40125**
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
17 MARSHALL STREET
DELTA AVENUE
WALNUT GROVE
35
38
35
AVENUE
18
MARSHALL STREET
WALNUT GROVE
ROSEMEAD BLVD
30125**
34
30/25**
`
AVENUE
19
MARSHALL STREET
ROSEMEAD BLVD
HART AVENUE
35
38
35
20 MARSHALL STREET
HART AVENUE
RIO HONDO AVENUE
35
37
35
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
21
MISSION DRIVE
WEST CITY LIMIT
WALNUT GROVE
40
43
40
AVENUE
22
MISSION DRIVE
WALNUT GROVE
ROSEMEAD BLVD
40
44
40
AVENUE
23
MISSION DRIVE
ROSEMEAD BLVD
VALLEY BLVD
40/25**
44
40/25**
`
24
MUSCATEL AVENUE
MARSHALL STREET
GRAND AVENUE
30125**
32
30125**
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
25
NEW AVENUE
GRAVES AVENUE
GARVEY AVENUE
35
38
35
26
RAMONA BOULEVARD WALNUT GROVE
IVAR AVENUE
30
32
30
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 851-H
AVENUE
27
RIO HONDO AVENUE
OLNEY STREET
VALLEY BLVD
30/25**
35
30/25**
`
28
ROSEMEAD PLACE
GARVEY AVENUE
EARLSWOOD DRIVE
35
37
35
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
= 25 mph when children are present
Engineering and Traffic Survey
9 City of Rosemead
•
I
T
able I
Summary •
Recommendat
ions
-Ali
Posted
• • C
ritical
Recommended
No'. Street
•
TO
Limit
• •
Speed Limit
Comments
29 RUSH STREET
SAN GABRIEL BLVD
WALNUT GROVE
AVENUE
40/25"
44
40125"
"
30 SAN GABRIEL BLVD
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DELTA STREET
45/25"
48
45/25"
"
31 SAN GABRIEL BLVD
RUSH STREET
GARVEY AVENUE
40
44
40
"
32 SAN GABRIEL BLVD
GARVEY AVENUE
HELLMAN AVENUE
40
42
40
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
33 TEMPLE CITY BLVD
OLNEY STREET
VALLEY BLVD
40
42
40
CLOSEST INCREMENT TO 85TH
34 TEMPLE CITY BLVD
VALLEY BLVD
NORTH CITY LIMITS
40
43
40
35 VALLEY BLVD
CHARLOTTE AVENUE
ROSEMEAD BLVD
35
40
35
36 VALLEY BLVD
ROSEMEAD BLVD
STRANG AVENUE
35
41
35
`
37 WALNUT GROVE
AVENUE
SAN GABRIEL BLVD
RUSH STREET
45
49
45
"
38 WALNUT GROVE
RUSH STREET
GARVEY AVENUE
40
43
40
`
AVENUE
39 WALNUT GROVE
GARVEY AVENUE
HELLMAN AVENUE
40
44
40125"`
AVENUE
40 WALNUT GROVE
HELLMAN AVENUE
VALLEY BLVD
40
45
40
AVENUE
41 WALNUT GROVE
VALLEY BLVD
MISSION BLVD
40
44
40
`
AVENUE
42 WALNUT GROVE
MISSION BLVD
NORTH CITY LIMIT
40
45
40
`
AVENUE
See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
= 25 mph when children are present
Engineering and Traffic Survey
10
City of Rosemead
ENGINEERING AND
TRAFFIC SURVEY
March 2006
II
WNG AND
SURVEY
11
11
11
I
FOR THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD
Prepared by:
A WILLDAN
Serving Public Agencies
1
1
1
1
N;~U W I LLDAN
Sei vir a Piilihr AaenciBs
March 7, 2006
Mr. Andy Lazarretto
City Manager
City of Rosemead
8838 Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, CA 91770
I Subject: 2006 Engineering and Traffic Survey
I i 1't 1 ( rossruads Parktaay North, Suite 405
Inrlusln California 91 746-149 7
;61;9(Iti-6200 lax -361/695-111(1
t~tvw.taiIIthn.i i,nt
' Dear Mr. Lazarretto:
As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and
' update the posted speed limits along 42 street segments in the City of Rosemead. These
segments were last surveyed in July 1999, and require an update to comply with the 7-year
limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).
We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures
and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the 42 selected street segments
in the City. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting
documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.
The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following
procedures outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated
2003, the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004 and as required by Section 627
of the California Vehicle Code. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of
Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed
enforcement.
We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Rosemead and the assistance and
cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study.
Very truly yours,
WILLDAN Q~OfESS~p~,_ Q~Oe~$SA
"qll k F. ~c
A A4
1a °c
LL' I No. 67583 No. 234t
Vaness Munoz P.E,T.E. * Exp. 6. 30 Exp•(.'30'06
A~
Traffic Engineer 1 s~q TRAFF\
OF CAI OF CA~~F
EZ:jmk (06-160)
15707/0307/R01
WILLDAN I ;I`r uali ior l'<ul North. Suite lUi
Industry, Californi a 91746-3497
Serving Public Agencies Sh2'O08-6200 fd\ 562'(, 15-2120
%\11H'IT1 C1111
March 7, 2006
Mr. Andy Lazarretto
City Manager
City of Rosemead
8838 Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, CA 91770
Subject: 2006 Engineering and Traffic Survey
Dear Mr. Lazarretto:
As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and
update the posted speed limits along 42 street segments in the City of Rosemead. These
segments were last surveyed in July 1999, and require an update to comply with the 7-year
limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).
We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey Procedures
and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the 42 selected street segments
in the City. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting
documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.
The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following
procedures outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated
2003, the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004 and as required by Section 627
1 of the California Vehicle Code. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of
Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed
enforcement.
We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Rosemead and the assistance and
cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study.
Very truly yours,
I WILLDAN
Vanessa Munoz P.E,T.E.
Traffic Engineer
EZ:jmk (06-160)
15707/0307/R01
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION 1-2
Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey 2-3
' SURVEY CONDITIONS 4
Survey Locations 4
Data Collection 4
Speed Data 4
Collision Data 4
Field Review Data 5
I ANALYSIS 6
Criteria 6
Results and Recommendations 6-7
Table 1-Summary of Recommendations 8-10
Segments with Special Conditions 11-16
LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES 17
Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code 17-22
APPENDIX A - Segment Data
' Street Segment Sheets
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
APPENDIX B - Collision Rates
APPENDIX C - Survey Equipment Used
w
Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rosemead
INTRODUCTION
This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment,
revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Rosemead.
This Engineering and Traffic Survey presents recommended speed limits for 42 street
segments in the City of Rosemead. Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the
State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce
those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. These surveys must be
updated every 5, 7 or 10 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated
by the California Vehicle Code (CVC).The CVC also requires that the surveys be
conducted based on the methodology required by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003 and the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004.
The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable
the Sheriffs Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for
speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic
Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is
legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The
surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a
24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(1)]. Additionally, some surveys may
be extended to 10 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic
conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(13)(i)(II)]. These provisions assure that posted
speed limits are kept reasonably current.
The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with
procedures outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated
2003, the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004 and as required by Section 627
of the California Vehicle Code. The Code further describes three elements of an
engineering and traffic survey:
1. Measurement of prevailing speed;
2. Accident history; and
3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist.
Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless
and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a
clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC
Section 22350). This law states "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed
greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic
on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers
the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning
of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
1 City of Rosemead
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers
behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and
competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits
established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the
highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a
few individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of
reasonable drivers.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily
apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions,
traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.
Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway
conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in
length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.
Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced
without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose
behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for
enforcement.
ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003 and the MUTCD
California Supplement dated May 2004 specifies the methodology to be used for
completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of
current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists.
The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as
follows:
Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar
unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a
statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the
distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th
percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of
the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and
reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a
"basic speed limit" is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the
85th percentile speed. For example, if the 85th percentile speed is 48 mph, the basic
speed limit is 50 mph. If the 85th percentile speed is 47 mph, the basic speed limit is 45
mph.
1
Engineering and Traffic Survey
2 City of Rosemead
Collision History
Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher
than average rate of collisions. A segment that has an above-average collision rate
typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.
A summa of the collision rates for the 42 surveyed street segments is provided in
summary
Appendix B.
Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be
readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are
significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the
basic speed limit. It is important to note that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) dated 2003 and the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004
recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below
the basic speed limit.
1
1
1
~I
I
1
1
Engineering and Tragic Survey
3 City of Rosemead
SURVEY CONDITIONS
SURVEY LOCATIONS
The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected
streets within the City of Rosemead. The specific location of the radar speed survey for
each street segment was selected after considering the following:
1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.
2. Minimum visibility restrictions.
3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.
4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the
normal operation of a vehicle.
DATA COLLECTION
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic
collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data
and field reviews were conducted at 42 locations during the months of November and
December 2005
Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 42 locations during November and
December 2005. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak
hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize
any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the
total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment.
Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments and separate
surveys were made for divided roadways.
Collision Data
Collision data was obtained from the City's SWITRS electronic collision database obtained
from the Temple City Sheriffs station (responsible for the City of Rosemead). For this
study, collision data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from
September 1, 2002 to September 1, 2005. The collision rates for the 42 segments are
expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-
hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then
entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate:
Ax1,000,000
R=
tx365 days xlxv
year
Engineering and Traffic Survey
4 City of Rosemead
' A = Number of midblock collisions over time period
R = Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
/ = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The
average statewide collision rate was obtained from the 2002 Collision Data on California
State Highways.
Field Review Data
A fie
ld review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with
cons
ideration for the following factors:
1.
Street width and alignment (design speed);
2.
Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;
3.
Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;
4.
Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;
5.
Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;
6.
Visibility obstructions;
7.
Land use and proximity to schools;
8.
Pedestrian and bicycle usage;
9.
Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and
10.
Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.
A
t
Engineering and Traffic Survey
5 City of Rosemead
ANALYSIS
CRITERIA
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in
accordance with several criteria contained in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
1 Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003 and the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004.
Some of the criteria used are:
A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85
percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining
what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher
than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set
lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful,"
and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The "basic speed limit" is the nearest
5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.
B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the
highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across
the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit
within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that
might require a speed lower than the critical speed.
C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates
that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other
jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average
collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered
1 reasonable for use in the City of Rosemead.
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a
thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street
segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 1. In
each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as
demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper
range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless an collision rate significantly higher than
expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were
identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic
speed limit are fully explained later in this report.
The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), has
made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface
conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other
Engineering and Traffic Survey
1 6 City of Rosemead
factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the
basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed
limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie
speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California
Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed
greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima
facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.
Table 1 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments.
The posted speed limits on the 42 street segments surveyed are recommended to
remain unchanged.
w
r
r
1
1
Engineering and Traffic Survey
7 City of Rosemead
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
~
t
t
i
~
LO
Go
to
OD
o
00
o
00
o
co
to
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
m
W
2
w
m
w
2
w
2
w
2
W
#
W
Ir
~
w
w
i
#
#
#
#
#
f
C)
z
z
z
z
z
U)
(
U)
U)
U)
W
W
w
w
w
w
O
O
O
O
O
O
J
U
J
U
J
U
J
U
J
U
J
U
to
N
v
m
M
LO
N
LO
N
~
M
V7
CYi
V)
M
i
f
LO
N
LO
M
O
M
O
M
M
■
N
Cl)
co
M
N
Iq
O
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
00
M
O
M
00
M
O
M
00
M
M
M
to
M
O
M
N
O
r
O
M
O
M
N
.
N
t f) o
M U')
M to
M LO
LO
M
O
M
~
O
■
io
M
O
M
O
M
M
z
g
m
m
¢
a
Z
m
J
Z
Z
w
a
w
>
>
w
>
~
J
m
>
z
Z
w
Z
>
}
a
z
0
~
U
I~
a
¢
Fr
(7
CD
¢
u
J
m
(D
w
X
m
0
~w
U
~w
Z
(n
>
<
J
w
(n
w
z
0
w
z
Z Z
Q>
C/)
w
o
Z
a>
>
a
w
0
F-
(A
~
a
cn
~ ¢
u~
w
3: ¢
c~
D
w
D
>
>
>
F-
-
w
:D
z
>
m
>
Z
>
w
>
z
m
z
Z
w
w
W
w
Q
7j
W
J
W_
O
x
¢
w
w
D
Z
Q
W
¢
¢
Z
F-
W
Z
>
Z
U
¢
m
m
F-w
0
>
¢
rn
W
>
>
¢
w
¢
F-
2
Z Z
¢
>
Cf)
¢
<
Q
Z
w
w
w
z
Z
w
0
w
0
0
>
O
Z
o
U)
U
Z
C7
w
w
>
>
>
w
U
w
Z
>
j
w
w
Z
w
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
;
¢
W
W
W
W
Z
>
>
¢
>
¢
W
w
o
z
z
a
Q
a
a
O
w
Q
Q
J
(n
O
W
F-
Z
w
w
w
w
Z
¢
Y
w
w
w
Q
-1
2
z
¢
¢
¢
¢
w
U
o
w
w
w
w
C7
C7
C7
c7
C7
=
N
M
U')
(O
I~
a0
0)
r
r
r
r
E
E
O
U
0
0
U
41
(n
N
C
0
w c
v in
c
U O
Q.
m ~
ca
0.
m~
3 ~
aci s
v~ s
<Z
E
N N
C II
# i
a~i m
m
~ m
U p
cr-
~ O
C ~
~U
'C
m
m
C
W
co
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
f
r
i )
co
l(7
W
O
co
O
GO
O
00
0
0
0
0
0
W
W
W
W
W
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
U)
w
w
w
w
O
O
O
O
O
U
U
U
U
U
.
O
c7
N
_
U')
M
N
`
O
cn
O
M
O
O
I
N
N
`
O
M
O
ch
N
.
O
M
O
O
ce)
O
st
O
M
O
fh
O
ce)
N
co
M
IT
ch
00
Cl)
r-
c7
C)
IT
N
ce)
00
M
N
M
O
m
I-
C7
M
Lc)
to
M
U')
M
M
0
C)
O
Ul)
O
LO
M
c07
LO
LO
M
s
O
It
O
Cf)
O
M
O
c7
e
H
w
Z
w
>
w
w
w
j
W
w
w
>
w
>
O
m
D
Q
O
1
L
m
j
Iz
w
w
o
Q
V
Z
O
//1
w~
J
m
Q
Z
J
m
O
U
Z
~w
Q
p
DD
lCL
W
W
Q
W
F-
(!J
_
U
Z Z
Q W
w
d'
=
O
Z Z
Q W
W
J
J
Z
aQ,
>
Q
Q
J
J
J
ate'
w
W
Q
E
2
Q
>
Ce)
Ue
>
>
w
0
>
m
D
J
w
>
O
J
W
>
0
J
w
w
w
>
w
w
Z
0
w
~
Z
U
a
j
O
W
Q
w
>
a
a
W
Q
O
H
U)
Q
w
W
W
Q
Z) W
Z
W
Q
U
H
~ w
ZZ
W
Q
U)
to
W
Z
W
}
>
a.
(n
J
Z
J W
Q
U)
O
F-
of
U)
W
J w
Q
(n
O
w
Q
>
Q
W
Z
-j W
Q
Z
J
X
Q
W
O
W
o
>
~Q
Q
>
m
-
o
>
~o
o
d
O
W
w
w
w
Q
>
=
Z
w
w
N
H
F-
>
>
>
Q W
w
D
Q
U
a
D
U)
U)
U)
w
Z
C13
0
(n
J
J
J
J
Z
Z
Z
Q
Z
W
U)
_
_
-r
=
O
O
O
Q
LL
w
cn
U)
(n
U)
(n
(n
_
0
O
w
y
O
J
O
J
rG
Z
Ln
co
r-
-
00
r
O
Co
N
N
N
N
CV)
N
q:r
N
O
N
W
N
r-
N
W
N
2
d
E
0
U
c
0
U
0)
c
O c
~ N
0
U n
m ~
U (C
Q C
U ~
CD
C t
(D 3
E ) L
Q
E
N O
~ N
~ II
• a
m (ao
m
~m
U ~
C
~U
.c
m
m
c
W
Q
1
r
t
t
1
r
1
1
1
1
co
~
O
O
1
Z
Z
W
W
f
t
i
w
w
t
i
i
t
t
i
k
•
t
Z
Z
w
w
U)
U)
O
O
U
U
14
N
O
O
O
Iq
O
q'
LO
M
O
m
LO
O
It
k
f
N
O
qq
O
I'
O
qq
Co
~
N
~
O
~
00
N
N
M
O
r
CA
V
O
qT
O
•
N
k
N
O
;r
O
O
4
O
sf
O
cn
O
M
O
V
O
q
O
O
O
O
v
• O
O
'
w
>
w
W
U)
>
2
2
w
Z
F-
w
z
>
W
Q
J
J
J
o
W
>
W
w
W
>
w
a
J
J
O
Z
H
Q
a
~
z
m
W
v
W
a
Z
F
=
a
j
z
m
w
v
2
Z
Z
w
• aj
F-
w
X
Q
J
w
J
Q
w
O
)
O
w
Q
1-
D
w
a
U
w
2
Q
>
(n
f
-
O
z
Q
C7
2
>
z
w
J
~
w
w
Z:)
w
13
J
W
D
m
J
w
J
H
w
D
z
>
w
w
0
>
Q
>
m
co
J
w
D
w
z
W
O
co
J
co
F
0
co
w
F-
z
a
z
J
co
m
U
F-
2
>
CO
W
w
o
w
W
U
2
>
a
J
O
• Z
Q
D
o
(n
w
a
z
J
J
a
a
2
(n
o
z
a
Cl)
Z)
w
a
J
w
J
Q
(n
(n
(n
c9
O
>
U
m
0
m
>
J
J
J
m
J
J
W
W
>
W
>
w
>
w
>
W
>
w
CD
w
co
w
w
m
~
CO
0
J
J
>
(n
m
Q
ca
Q
in
a
J
J
m
W
co
w
c~
Z) ~
Z) 7)
D~
DZ)
=
CO
0
Z
CD
z
C9
z
IL
a
J
J
Q
J
J
Q
Zz
J W
Q>
Zz
J I
Q>
Zz
J W
Q>
Zz
J w
Q>
zz
J w
a>
Zz
J W
Q>
cr-
Q
(n
Q
(n
Q
(n
W
W
P
>
>
~a
~a
~a
~a
~a
3a
(3)
O
M
M
N
ce)
Cl)
M
V
M
O
m
(O
M
I-
M
00
C)
O
(7
O
-
N
c
0)
E
E
U
o
c
O
U
(D
c
o~
c
O
U n
m ~
nc
co
w
U
3L
w (D
c L
N ~
cI L
Q
v) E
O04
~ N
U) II
i ~
~ m
m
~ N
U p
~ O
cU
+a
m
m
C
W
O
e-
I
SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per
hour (mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the
driver. Each segment is discussed below.
Segment #2 - Del Mar Avenue - Graves Avenue to Garvey Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction
south of Wasola Street and 1 through lane in each direction north of Wasola Street with an
ADT of 16,595 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the vicinity
of a school. The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted
speed limit. However, due to various hidden driveways, merging lanes, moderate
pedestrian traffic, and an uncontrolled school crossing that may not be apparent to
unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit
remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are
recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.
Segment #8 - Garvey Avenue - West City Limit to Del Mar Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 26,874 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is heavily commercial. The
critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However,
due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking, and moderate truck traffic that
may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is
recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
1 Segment #9 - Garvey Avenue - Del Mar Avenue to San Gabriel Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 26,980 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is heavily commercial. The
critical speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However,
due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking, and moderate truck traffic that
may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is
recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #10 - Garvey Avenue - San Gabriel Boulevard to Walnut Grove Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 27,431 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is heavily commercial. The
critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However,
due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking, moderate truck traffic, and
moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed
limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above
reasons.
Segment #11 - Garvey Avenue - Walnut Grove Avenue to East City Limit
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 28,277 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is heavily commercial. The
critical speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However,
due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking, and moderate truck traffic that
Engineering and Traffic Survey
71 City of Rosemead
may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain a consistent speed limit with the
adjacent segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit
remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #12 - Grand Avenue - Charlotte Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with
an ADT of 3,487 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial.
The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit.
However, due to the various hidden driveways, horizontal curve, and high left turn volumes
without left turn lanes that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is
prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #13 - Hellman Avenue - New Avenue to Walnut Grove Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with
an ADT of 4,946 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial.
The critical speed is 33 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit.
However, due to the various hidden driveways, high left turn volumes without left turn
lanes, and a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed
limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above
reasons.
Segment #14 - Jackson Avenue - Graves Avenue to Garvey Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with
an ADT of 3,315 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the
vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a .35 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, moderate pedestrian
traffic, and a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed
limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above
reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the
California Vehicle Code.
Segment #15 - Loftus Street - Temple City Boulevard to East City Limit
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 14,283 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical
speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to
the posted speed in the adjacent agency, various hidden driveways, and a vertical curve
that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain a consistent speed limit with
the adjacent segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed
limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #17 - Marshall Street - Delta Avenue to Walnut Grove Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with
an ADT of 6,030 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed
is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a
consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways,
and high left turn volumes without left turn lanes that may not be apparent to unfamiliar
Engineering and Traffic Survey
12 City of Rosemead
drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35
mph for the above reasons.
Segment #18 - Marshall Street - Walnut Grove Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with
an ADT of 9,337 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the
vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 34 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, horizontal curve and
high left turn volumes without left turn lanes that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers,
a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for
the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352
of the California Vehicle Code.
Segment #19 - Marshall Street - Rosemead Boulevard to Hart Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 11,515 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical
speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However to
maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden
driveways, high collision rate, and variation of street width that may not be apparent to
unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit
remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #21 - Mission Drive - West City Limit to Walnut Grove Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 16,015 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed
is 43 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a
consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways,
high left turn volumes without left turn lanes, and uncontrolled crosswalks that may not be
apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the
speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #22 - Mission Drive - Walnut Grove Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 17,175 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical
speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to
maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden
driveways, high left turn volumes without left turn lanes, and an uncontrolled crosswalk that
may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is
recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #23 - Mission Drive - Rosemead Boulevard to Valley Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 12,857 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential, commercial, and
1 within the vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45
mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent
segments and due to various hidden driveways, horizontal curve, high left turn volumes
without left turn lanes, and an uncontrolled crosswalk, that may not be apparent to
Engineering and Tragic Survey
13 City of Rosemead
unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit
remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are
recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.
Segment #25 - New Avenue - Graves Avenue to Garvey Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with
an ADT of 8,725 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is multi-family residential and
some commercial. The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking and
a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is
prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #27 - Rio Hondo Avenue - Olney Street to Valley Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 7,906 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the
vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to various hidden driveways and the occurrence of
' vertical and horizontal curves that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed
limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above
reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the
California Vehicle Code.
I Segment #29 - Rush Street - San Gabriel Boulevard to Walnut Grove Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 8,929 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the
vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to various hidden driveways, a vertical curve, and
moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed
limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above
reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the
California Vehicle Code.
Segment #30 - San Gabriel Boulevard - South City Limit to Delta Street
This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 20,521 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial.
The critical speed is 48 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit.
However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to the
moderate truck traffic and horizontal curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a
lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for
the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352
of the California Vehicle Code.
Segment #31 - San Gabriel Boulevard - Rush Street to Garvey Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 24,022 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial. The critical
speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to
maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden
Engineering and Traffic Survey
14 City of Rosemead
driveways, vertical curve, and heavy curb parking that may not be apparent to unfamiliar
drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40
mph for the above reasons.
Segment #34 - Temple City Boulevard - Valley Boulevard to North City Limits
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 19,880 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial.
The critical speed is 43 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit.
' However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to
various hidden driveways and moderate truck traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar
drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40
mph for the above reasons.
Segment #35 - Valley Boulevard - Charlotte Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard
( This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 29,289 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial. The critical
1 speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However to
maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to moderate
pedestrian activity and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar
drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40
mph for the above reasons.
Segment #36 - Valley Boulevard - Rosemead Boulevard to Strang Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 26,357 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial. The critical
speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to
the adjacent segment posted speed limit, various hidden driveways, and moderate
pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is
1 prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #37 - Walnut Grove Avenue - San Gabriel Boulevard to Rush Street
This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 17,241 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial and fronted by a
golf course and university. The critical speed is 49 mph and would normally justify a 50
mph posted speed limit. However, due to the adjacent posted speed limit, steep vertical
curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a
lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for
the above reasons.
Segment #38 - Walnut Grove Avenue - Rush Street to Garvey Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 16,253 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed
is 43 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the
various hidden driveways and heavy curb parking that may not be apparent to unfamiliar
drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40
mph for the above reasons.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
15 City of Rosemead
Segment #39 - Walnut Grove Avenue - Garvey Avenue to Hellman Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 25,495 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the
vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph
posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent
' segments and due to various hidden driveways, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may
not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended
that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school
zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.
Segment #40 - Walnut Grove Avenue - Hellman Avenue to Valley Boulevard
' This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 23,293 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial.
The critical speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit.
However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to
various hidden driveways, and both vertical and horizontal curves that may not be apparent
1 to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit
remain at 40 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #41 - Walnut Grove Avenue - Valley Boulevard to Mission Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 18,561 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed
is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a
consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways,
and high left turn volumes without left turn lanes that may not be apparent to unfamiliar
drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40
mph for the above reasons.
Segment #42 - Walnut Grove Avenue - Mission Boulevard to North City Limit
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with
an ADT of 14,061 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed
is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a
consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways,
and horizontal curves that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is
prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons.
1
Engineering and Traffic Survey
16 City of Rosemead
LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES
APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE
1 SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
Section 627.
(a) "Engineering and traffic survey,"as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic
conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for
1 use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed
necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
(2) Accident records.
1 (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
(c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the
factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the
following:
(1) Residential density.
(2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Basic Speed Law
r 22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or
prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the
highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Speed Law Violations
Section 22351.
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section
22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in
violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section
22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant
establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a
violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22352.
(a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in
this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
Engineering and Traffic Survey
17 City of Rosemead
(1) Fifteen mph
A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the
approach to the crossing the driver does not have clear and unobstructed view of the
crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions
along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade
crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or
mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the
immediate approach of a railway train or car.
B) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of his
approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view
of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection
for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected
by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
C) On any alley.
(2) Twenty-five mph
A) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district
unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in
this code.
(B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof,
contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while
children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the
noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or
passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence,
gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the
highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this
subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up
to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens,
contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard
"SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to
this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received
and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be
implemented. A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to
pay for the erection of those signs.
(3) Thirty-five miles per hour on any highway, other than a state highway, in any
moderate density residential district, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 22352.1,
when posted with a sign giving notice of that speed limit, unless a different speed is
determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (applies to
Town of Apple Valley only)
Increase of Local Limits
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey
that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour (mph) would facilitate the orderly movement of
Engineering and Traffic Survey
18 City of Rosemead
' vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state
highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 mph, the local authority may by
ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60
mph or a maximum speed limit of 65 mph, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate
the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or
maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are
erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an
engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25 mph prima facie limit,
which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing
a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section
22366.
If over 55 mph Maximum Speed for Designated Vehicles
Section 22406.
(a) No person may drive any of the following vehicles on a highway at a speed in excess of 55
' mph:
(1) A motortruck or truck tractor having three or more axles or any motortruck or truck
tractor drawing any other vehicle.
(2) A passenger vehicle or bus drawing any other vehicle.
(3) A school bus transporting any school pupil.
(4) A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers.
(5) A vehicle transporting explosives.
(6) A trailer bus, as defined in Section 636.
1 (b) Any person who operates a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in Section 15210, upon a
highway at a speed exceeding a maximum speed limit established under this code by 15
mph or more, is guilty of a misdemeanor. A violation of this subdivision shall be considered a
"serious traffic violation," as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 15210, and shall be subject
to the sanctions provided under Section 15306 or 15308, in addition to any other penalty
provided by law.
Downward Speed Zoning
Section 22358.5.
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface
conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would
' not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient
regulation as to such conditions.
Boundary Line Streets
Section 22359.
With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different
jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any
such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have
Engineering and Traffic Survey
19 City of Rosemead
approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of
separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Speedtrap Prohibition
Section 40801.
No peace officer or other person shall use a speedtrap in arresting, or participating or assisting in
the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speedtrap be used in
securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under
this code.
Speedtrap
Section 40802.
(a) A "speedtrap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries
marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle
may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known
distance.
(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this
code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3,
if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey
conducted within 5 years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of
the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures
the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or
school zone.
(b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage
and federal-aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that
when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the
maps, a "local street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to
abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half mile of a uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include
official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section "School Zone" means that area of road contiguous to a school
building or the grounds thereof, and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign,
while children are going to or leaving the school wither during school hours or during the
noon recess period.
(c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable
and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
Engineering and Traffic Survey
20 City of Rosemead
1
leted a
ccessfull
com
i
i
th
it
ti
h
i
ffi
Wh
d
d
th
(A)
y
p
ng
on
as su
,
cer
ssu
e c
a
ar
s use
e o
en ra
radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and
the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer
Standards and Training.
(B)
When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving
h
e
objects, the officer issuing the notice to appear has successfully completed t
training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less
than 2 hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards
and Training.
(C)(i)
The prosecution proved that the officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and
that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer
issuing the notice to appear, the officer establish that the radar, laser, or other
electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii)
The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the condition
present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of
Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D)
The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the
accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic
Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the 3 years prior to
the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and
testing or calibration facility.
"
"
speedtrap
is either of the following:
(2) A
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries
marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle
may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known
distance.
(B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that
is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph
(2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357,
22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering
and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date
of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or
any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(1) Except as specified in subclause (II), 7 years.
1 (11) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than 7 years prior to
the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the
section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in
roadway or traffic condition have occurred including, but not limited to,
changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume,
10 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
21 City of Rosemead
Speedtrap Evidence
Section 40803.
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon
the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed
of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use
of a speedtrap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where
enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed
of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the
evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted
within 5 years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed
on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall
constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speedtrap
as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
1
1
1
Engineering and Traffic Survey
22 City of Rosemead
CITY OF ROSEMEAD E~i
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET DE ADELENA STREET
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD
TO ELLIS LANE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005
Posted Speed Limit 30 mph
Time of Speed Survey
1:OOPM
Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
30 mph
CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed
32 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
26-35
Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph
1
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
91
Number of Survey Samples
47
' COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 4
1 Annual Collision Rate 1.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 4.439
1
1
1
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
1,112 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
TWO LANES,UNSTRIPED
Type of Traffic Control
STOP @ ELLIS, ROSEMEAD BLVD, RIO HONDO
Crosswalks?
@ ALL STOPS
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
YES, BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.740 miles
Width
40 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
YES, MOST ON SOUTH SIDE
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Vanessa
3
Number
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD F__2]
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET DEL MAR AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM GRAVES AVENUE
TO GARVEY AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005
Posted Speed Limit 35/25" mph
Time of Speed Survey
9:OOAM
Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
35 mph
HIDDEN DWYS.,CHG. IN LNS, PEDS,
85th Percentile Speed
38 mph
SCHOOL XWALK
10 mph Pace Speed
30-39
Recommended Speed Limit 35/25" mph
1
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
85
Number of Survey Samples
121
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
5
Annual Collision Rate
1.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.550
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
16,595 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES-UNDIV., 2 LANES UNDIV. N. OF WASOLA
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ GRAVES, GARVEY
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.,HIGHCLIFF
Pedestrian Traffic
MODERATE
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.500 miles
Width
64 feet
Vertical Curve?
SLIGHT
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
'
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
7 TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
Date State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET DEL MAR AVENUE
FROM GARVEY AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
TO HELLMAN AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 38 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed 42 mph
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78
Number of Survey Samples 209
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 4
Annual Collision Rate 1.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.320
1
J
1
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 22,803 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes 4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ GARVEY, EMERSON, HELLMAN
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
YES, BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.500 miles
Width
64 feet
Vertical Curve?
YES
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
SOME ON EAST SIDE
Adjacent Land Use
COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traff ic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
3/~/0(
Vanessa Munoz
State Registration Number
r"1
LJ
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD ( g.ll
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET EARLSWOOD DRIVE
FROM IVAR AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
TO ROSEMEAD PLACE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey 11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph
Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 27 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed 30 mph
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89
Number of Survey Samples 72
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 0
Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
2,372 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
1
Type of Traffic Control
STOP @ IVAR
Crosswalks?
NONE
'
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
YES, BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
NONE
'
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
1
1
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
0.260 miles
36 feet
NONE
YES, NORTH AND SOUTH END
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
GOOD
YES, BOTH SIDES
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
n /
Munoz
State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 0
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET ELLIS LANE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM OLNEY STREET TO TEMPLE CITY BLVD
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey 1/10/2006 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph
Time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 29 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed 32 mph
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83
Number of Survey Samples 131
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
0
'
Annual Collision Rate
0 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.000
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
1,814 Date Counted 11/17/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
'
Type of Traff ic Control
STOPS @ TEMPLE CITY, OLNEY, MARSHALL
Crosswalks?
@ MARSHALL
'
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
YES, BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.510 miles
Width
40 feet
1
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
YES, AT RALPH AVE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
WEST SIDE ONLY
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State f California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
3 Q
'
TE 2341
Vanes Munoz
Date State Registration Number
P
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET EMERSON PLACE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM NEW AVENUE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25" mph
Time of Speed Survey 9:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 30 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed 32 mph
10 mph Pace Speed 25-34 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25"" mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90
Number of Survey Samples 71
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 0
Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000
1
1
11
1
1
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
5,507 Date Counted 11/17/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ NEW AVE, DEL MAR, SAN GABRIEL
Crosswalks?
ALL T.S.,STOPS , PROSPECT,EVELYN
Pedestrian Traffic
MODERATE
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
YES, BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, MANY
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
1.000 miles
Width
37 feet
Vertical Curve?
YES,BET DEL MAR,KELBURN
Horizontal Curve?
YES, SLIGHT AT JACKSON
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
NORTH SIDE ONLY
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL,SCHOOL,PARK
i
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the States of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Vanessa Munoz
State Registration Number
1
11
t
1
1
1
1
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 0
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET ENCINITA AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3012006
FROM MISSION ROAD TO LOWER A7USA ROAD
Date of Speed Survey
11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25'" mph
Time of Speed Survey
2:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
29 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed
32 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
24-33 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25" mph
Percentage of Vehicles In Pace
89
Number of Survey Samples
66
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
3
Annual Collision Rate
1 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.919
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
7,842 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ LOWER AZUSA, MISSION ; STOP 0 RIO DELL
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.,STOPS, PITKIN, ROSE
Pedestrian Traffic
HEAVY
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.380 miles
Width
45 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Munoz
State Registration Number
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD F
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET GARVEY AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 317/2006
FROM WEST CITY LIMIT
TO DEL MAR AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
3:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
34 mph HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG., TRUCK
'
85th Percentile Speed
38 mph TRAFFIC
10 mph Pace Speed
30-39 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
72
'
Number of Survey Samples
204
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
4
Annual Collision Rate
1.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.277
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
26,874 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - DIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ DEL MAR, JACKSON
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
'
Truck Traffic
MODERATE
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, MANY
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.490 miles
Width
76 feet
'
Vertical Curve?
YES
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
BOTH SIDES
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
HEAVY COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as
a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
3 6 TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
Date State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEM EAD U
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET GARVEY AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM DEL MAR AVENUE
TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
2:00PM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
35 mph HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG., TRUCK
85th Percentile Speed
39 mph TRAFFIC
10 mph Pace Speed
30-39 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
75
'
Number of Survey Samples
210
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
10
Annual Collision Rate
3.333 accidents/year
'
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.664
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
26,980 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - DIVIDED
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ SAN GABRIEL, KELBURN, DEL MAR
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
'
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
MODERATE
On-Street Parking
YES, BOTH SIDES- RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, MANY
ROADWAY FACTORS
'
Length of Segment
0.510 miles
Width
76 feet
Vertical Curve?
YES
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
'
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
HEAVY COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz,
do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
'
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2341
Vanes a Munoz
Dat State Registration Number
1
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 10
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET GARVEY AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM SAN GABRIEL BLVD
TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
1:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
34 mph HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG., TRUCK
'
85th Percentile Speed
38 mph TRAFFIC, PEDS.
10 mph Pace Speed
29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
Number of Surve
les
Sam
76
205
y
p
COLLISION HISTORY
'
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
12
Annual Collision Rate
4 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.815
TRAFFIC FACTORS
'
Average Daily Traff ic
27,431 Date Counted 11/17/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - DIVIDED, 2WY LT LANES, LT POCKETS
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE, DELTA, SAN GABRIEL
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
MODERATE
'
Truck Traffic
MODERATE
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, MANY
ROADWAY FACTORS
'
Length of Segment
0.490 miles
Width
76 feet
'
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
'
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Adjacent Land Use
HEAVY COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
'
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as
a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
'
2
.3 TE 2341
Vanedsa Murrdz
Date State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD F-1 11
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET GARVEY AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
TO EAST CITY LIMIT
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/9/2005
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
3:OOPM
Speed Justification
'
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
35 mph
39 mph
HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG., TRUCK
TRAFFIC,ADJ SEG SPEED
10 mph Pace Speed
29-38
Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
71
'
Number of Survey Samples
204
' COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 13
' Annual Collision Rate 4.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.712
1
1
1
1
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
28,277 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - DIVIDED W/LT POCKETS
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ LEE,COMM. CTR,ROSEMEAD PL,MUSCATEL,WAL GRV
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
MODERATE
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, MANY
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.590 miles
Width
76 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions FAIR
Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use HEAVY COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET GRAND AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM CHARLOTTE AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD
12
Date of Speed Survey
11/9/2005
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
11:OOAM
Speed Justification
'
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
34 mph
38 mph
HIDDEN DWYS, HORIZ. CURVE, NO LT.
LANES
10 mph Pace Speed
29-38
Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
81
Number of Survey Samples
62
'
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
2
Annual Collision Rate
0.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Mlles
0.519
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
3,487 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
'
Type of Traffic Control
STOP @ ROSEMEAD, WALNUT GROVE
Crosswalks?
@ ALL STOPS
'
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Driveways?
MAINLY ON SOUTH SIDE
'
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
1.010 miles
Width
40 feet
'
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
YES, AT MUSKATEL,ROSEMEAD
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
t
Roadway Conditions
FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
t
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz,
do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
'
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
'
Q TE 2341
Vanessa unoz
ate State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD F-1 3]
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET HELLMAN AVENUE
FROM NEW AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/2006
TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph
Time of Speed Survey 1:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 29 mph HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT. LANES, VERT.
85th Percentile Speed 33 mph CURVE
10 mph Pace Speed 25-34 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86
Number of Survey Samples 102
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 15
Annual Collision Rate 5 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.846
TRAFFIC FACTORS
'
Average Daily Traffic
4,946 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @WALNUT GRV.,SAN GABRIEL,DEL MAR,JACKSON,NEW
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
'
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
1.500 miles
Width
38 feet
'
Vertical Curve?
YES,AT KELBURN
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
'
Roadway Conditions
FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz,
do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
'
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the Stat of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
'
TE2341
Vanessa Munoz
Date State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 14
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET JACKSON AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM GRAVES AVENUE TO GARVEY AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/2/2005
Posted Speed Limit 30/25"" mph
Time of Speed Survey
3:OOPM
Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
30 mph
HIDDEN DWYS., PEDS., VERT. CURVE
85th Percentile Speed
35 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
26-35
Recommended Speed Limit 30/25" mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
79
Number of Survey Samples
72
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
1
Annual Collision Rate
0.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.551
'
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
3,315 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ GRAVES ; STOP @ FERN, GRAVES
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.,STOPS, EGLEY
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
MODERATE
NONE
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, MANY
'
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.500 miles
Width
36 feet
'
Vertical Curve?
YES,AT NORTH OF GRAVES AV
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
t
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
FAIR
Lighting
WEST SIDE ONLY
'
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz,
do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
1
i
)6
3 X 1
'
'
2~~
'4
4
TE 2341
Vanes unoz
Date State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 15
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET LOFTUS STREET CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM TEMPLE CITY BLVD TO EAST CITY LIMIT
Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey 1:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph ADJ. AGENCY SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS.,
85th Percentile Speed 39 mph VERT. CURVE,
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles In Pace 75
Number of Survey Samples 138
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 1
Annual Collision Rate 0.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.492
TRAFFIC FACTORS
'
Average Daily Traffic
14,283 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. 0 TEMPLE CITY BLVD
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
'
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
'
Length of Segment
0.130 miles
Width
60 feet
'
Vertical Curve?
YES,AT EAST END
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
'
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz,
do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
'
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
Date State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 16
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET LOWER AZUSA ROAD
CERTIFICATION DATE 317/2006
FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD
TO ENCINITA AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/2/2005
Posted Speed Limit 40/25"' mph
Time of Speed Survey
3:OOPM
Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
39 mph
CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed
42 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
34-43
Recommended Speed Limit 40/25'" mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
79
Number of Survey Samples
145
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
0
Annual Collision Rate
0 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.000
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
14,542 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ ROSMEAD, ENCINITA
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
NO PARKING
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, NORTH SIDE MANY
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
0.330 miles
56 feet
NONE
NONE
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
GOOD
YES, BOTH SIDES
RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Vanessa Munoz
3A3~O&
State Registration Number
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD I 17
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET MARSHALL STREET CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM DELTA AVENUE TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
Date of Speed Survey
11/8/2005
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
10:OOAM
Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
35 mph
ADJ. SEG SPEED., HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT.
85th Percentile Speed
38 mph
LANES
10 mph Pace Speed
29-38
Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
88
Number of Survey Samples
89
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
0
Annual Collision Rate
0 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.000
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
Crosswalks?
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Sidewalks?
Driveways?
6,030 Date Counted
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE
ALL T.S.
LIGHT
LIGHT
BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
YES, BOTH SIDES
YES, BOTH SIDES
11/8/2005
' ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment 0.250 miles
Width 40 feet
' Vertical Curve? NONE
Horizontal Curve? NONE
Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
' Roadway Conditions GOOD, NO LEFT TURN LANES
Lighting NORTH SIDE ONLY
' Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
' the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the Stpte of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Number
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 18
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET MARSHALL STREET
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/8/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25** mph
Time of Speed Survey
9:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
30 mph HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT. LANES,HORIZ.
85th Percentile Speed
34 mph CURVE
10 mph Pace Speed
26-35 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25** mph
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
88
Number of Survey Samples
93
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
2
Annual Collision Rate
0.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.369
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
9,337 Date Counted 11/8/2005
'
Number of Lanes
Type of Traff ic Control
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
T.S. @ ROSEMEAD, WALNUT GRV.;STOPOMUSCATEL,BARLET
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S. AND STOPS
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES- RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
1 ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment 0.530 miles
Width 40 feet
Vertical Curve? NONE
Horizontal Curve? YES, EAST OF BARTLETT
' Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions GOOD, NO LEFT TURN LANES
Lighting NORTH SIDE ONLY
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz Dat State Registration Number
1
t
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 19
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET MARSHALL STREET
FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD
CERTIFICATION DATE 317/2006
TO HART AVENUE
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005
Time of Speed Survey
3:OOPM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
35 mph
85th Percentile Speed
38 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
79
Number of Survey Samples
137
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Speed Justification
ADJ.SEG.SPEED,HIDDEN DWYS., COLLIS.
RATE, CHG. IN ST. WIDTH
Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 14
Annual Collision Rate 4.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 4.626
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
Crosswalks?
'
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Sidewalks?
Driveways?
11,515 Date Counted
4 LANES - DIVIDED
T.S. @ ROSEMEAD ; STOP @ HART
@ ALL T.S.
LIGHT
LIGHT
NORTH SIDE ONLY -RESTRICTED
YES, BOTH SIDES
YES, MANY ON NORTHSIDE
111/8/2005
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment 0.240 miles
Width 71 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Munoz
Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 20
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET MARSHALL STREET
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM HART AVENUE
TO RIO HONDO AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
2:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
34 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed
37 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
84
Number of Survey Samples
88
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
1
Annual Collision Rate
0.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.569
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traff ic
6,418 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
STOP @ HART, RIO HONDO
Crosswalks?
@ RIO HONDO
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
'
Truck Traffic
NONE
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
0.250 miles
40 feet
NONE
NONE
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
GOOD
SOUTH SIDES ONLY
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of C lifornia as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
.L~
Vanessa Munoz
State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEM EAD 21
'
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET MISSION DRIVE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM WEST CITY LIMIT
TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
10:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
39 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED,HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT.
85th Percentile Speed
43 mph LANES, UNC. XWALK
10 mph Pace Speed
34-43 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
74
Number of Survey Samples
169
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
2
Annual Collision Rate
0.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.407
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
16,015 Date Counted 11/17/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S., EARLE, DELTA
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES- RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.280 miles
Width
65 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
ZJ
~
~ /1 0
t::
2
TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
to State Registration Number
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 22
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET MISSION DRIVE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/8/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
3:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
39 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED., HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT.
'
85th Percentile Speed
44 mph LANES, UNC. XWALK,
10 mph Pace Speed
36-45 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
68
Number of Survey Samples
179
'
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
6
Annual Collision Rate
2 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.570
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
17,175 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
T.S. @ ROSEMEAD, MUSKATEL, WALNUT GROVE
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S., IVAR
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
1
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.560 miles
Width
65 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the Stat of California as
a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
-31--) Lav TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
Date State Registration Number
f.
1
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005
Time of Speed Survey
9:OOAM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
40 mph
44 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
73
Number of Survey Samples
176
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET MISSION DRIVE CERTIFICATION DATE 317/2006
FROM ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD TO VALLEY BLVD
23
Posted Speed Limit 40/25" mph
Speed Justification
ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., HORIZ.
CURVE, UNC. XWALK, NO LT. LANE
Recommended Speed Limit 40/25" mph
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 7
1 Annual Collision Rate 2.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.956
e
1
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
12,857 Date Counted 11/17/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ VALLEY, ROSEMEAD, ENCINITA
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S., NEWBY
Pedestrian Traffic
MODERATE
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.520 miles
Width
65 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
YES, EAST OF ENCINITA
Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES
Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL,SCHOOL
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
State Registration Number
Vanessa Munoz
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 24
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET MUSCATEL AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM MARSHALL STREET
TO GRAND AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/8/2005
Posted Speed Limit 30/25'" mph
Time of Speed Survey
2:OOPM
Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
30 mph
CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed
32 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
25-34
Recommended Speed Limit 30/25`" mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
95
Number of Survey Samples
63
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 5
1 Annual Collision Rate 1.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.567
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
Crosswalks?
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
Sidewalks?
Driveways?
I
5,754 Date Counted 2/8/2006
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
T.S. @ MISSION, VALLEY; STOP @ MARSHALL, GRAND
ALL T.S., AND STOPS,SCOTT
LIGHT
LIGHT
BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED
YES, BOTH SIDES
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
1.400 miles
40 feet
NONE
NONE
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
GOOD
YES, BOTH SIDES
RESIDENTIAL,CIVIC CENTER, PARK, SCHOOL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
State Registration Number
J
F
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 25
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET NEW AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE 317/2006
r
FROM GRAVES AVENUE
TO GARVEY AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/2/2005
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
2:OOPM
Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph
HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PARKING,VERT.
85th Percentile Speed
38 mph
CURVE
10 mph Pace Speed
31-40
Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
79
Number of Survey Samples
104
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
2
'
Annual Collision Rate
0.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.419
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traff ic
8,725 Date Counted 11/10/2005
'
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
T.S. @ GARVEY, NEWMARK ; STOP@ GRAVES
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S. AND STOPS
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.500 miles
Width
Vertical Curve?
56 feet
YES,AT NORTH OF GRAVES AV
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,COMMERCIAL AT GARVEY
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
1
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
r
L TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
D e State Registration Number
I
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET RAMONA BOULEVARD CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE TO IVAR AVENUE
26
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph
Time of Speed Survey
11:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
30 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed
32 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
25-34 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
93
Number of Survey Samples
73
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
4
'
Annual Collision Rate
1.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
1.662
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
4,777 Date Counted 11/10/2005
'
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE; STOP@BURTON
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S. AND STOPS
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
EAST SIDE ONLY-RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
SOUTH SIDE ONLY
Driveways?
SOUTH SIDE ONLY
1
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.460 miles
Width
33 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
YES, WEST OF BURTON
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
SOUTH SIDE ONLY
'
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
I
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and Is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as
a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
b TE 2341
/'q, Lo
Vanessa Munoz
Date State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEM EAD 27
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET RIO HONDO AVENUE
FROM OLNEY STREET
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
TO VALLEY BLVD
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25" mph
Time of Speed Survey
11:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
30 mph HIDDEN DWYS., VERT. & HORIZ. CURVES
35 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
24-33 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25" mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
78
Number of Survey Samples
82
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
0
'
Annual Collision Rate
0 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.000
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
7,906 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ VALLEY BLVD;STOP @ DE ADELANE, MARSHALL
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S. AND STOPS
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
YES BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.550 miles
Width
40 feet
Vertical Curve?
YES, NORTH OF DE ADELENA
Horizontal Curve?
YES, NORTH OF DE ADELENA
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
WEST SIDE ONLY
'
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By JA
Checked By VM
1
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as
a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
IJ6 TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
ate State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET ROSEMEAD PLACE
FROM GARVEY AVENUE
CERTIFICATION DATE
TO EARLSWOOD DRIVE
3/7/2006
28
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Time of Speed Survey
9:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
34 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
37 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
88
Number of Survey Samples
81
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
1
Annual Collision Rate
0.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.945
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
2,300 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
2 LANES - UNDIVIDED
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S @ GARVEY
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
NONE
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.420 miles
Width
55 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
MAINLY ON EAST SIDE
'
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By
JA Checked By VM
'
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of C
alifornia as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
3 Av A ~O TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
ate State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 29
'
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET RUSH STREET
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM SAN GABRIEL BLVD
TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40/25" mph
Time of Speed Survey
1:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
39 mph HIDDEN DWYS., VERT. CURVE, PEDS.
85th Percentile Speed
44 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40/25"' mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
74
Number of Survey Samples
133
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
1
Annual Collision Rate
0.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.209
'
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
8,929 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
4 LANES - DIVIDED
T.S. @ SAN GABRIEL, WALNUT GROVE
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S., ANGELUS
Pedestrian Traffic
MODERATE
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.490 miles
Width
Vertical Curve?
87 feet
YES,WEST OF WALNUT GROVE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
YES, ON MEDIAN
'
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered In the State of California as
a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
3 Zo 4 TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
/Datfi State Registration Number
~l
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 30
'
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET SAN GABRIEL BLVD
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
t
FROM SOUTH CITY LIMIT
TO DELTA STREET
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 45/25'" mph
Time of Speed Survey
3:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
44 mph HORIZ. CURVE, ADJ SEG SPEED,TRUCK
'
85th Percentile Speed
48 mph TRAFFIC
10 mph Pace Speed
39-48 Recommended Speed Limit 45/25" mph
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
70
Number of Survey Samples
197
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
5
'
Annual Collision Rate
1.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.337
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
20,521 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - DIVIDED WITH LT LANES
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @TOWN CENTER, WALNUT GROVE, DELTA, 60 FWY
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
MODERATE
On-Street Parking
YES, BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
SOME,BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES,BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.660 miles
Width
84 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
YES, NORTH OF 60 FWY
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
'
Adjacent Land Use
MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By JA
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as
a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
'
31?-10b TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz
Da a State Registration Number
I
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 31
' ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET SAN GABRIEL BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM RUSH STREET TO GARVEY AVENUE
1
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
10:00AM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
39 mph HIDDEN DWYS., VERT. CURVE, CURB
44 mph PKG.,ADJ SEG SPEED
10 mph Pace Speed
35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles In Pace
70
Number of Survey Samples
181
COLLISION HISTORY
f Y
St
N
b
i
d
a
3
um
er o
ears
ud
e
ye
rs
Total Collisions
11
Annual Collision Rate
3.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.558
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
24,022 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED WITH CENTER LT LANES
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ RUSH, GRAVES, GARVEY, KLINGERMAN
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
'
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES. BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
0.750 miles
1
1
84 feet
YES, N OF KLINGERMAN
NONE
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
GOOD
YES, BOTH SIDES
COMMERCIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
/.~[7 3/3'-/Qy TE 2341
State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 32
i
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET SAN GABRIEL BLVD
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM GARVEY AVENUE
TO HELLMAN AVENUE
SPEEDFACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005
Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
11:OOAM
Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
39 mph
CLOSEST TO 85TH
'
85th Percentile Speed
42 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
34-43
Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
1
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
76
Number of Survey Samples
203
1
t
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
21
Annual Collision Rate
7 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
1.170
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
32,793 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED WITH LT LANES
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ GARVEY, EMERSON, HELLMAN
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
MODERATE
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.500 miles
Width
76 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
GOOD
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,COMMERCIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State oA California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
4
Vanessa Munoz
State Registration Number
t
II
t
CITY OF ROSEMEAD U
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET TEMPLE CITY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM OLNEY STREET TO VALLEY BLVD
Date of Speed Survey
11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
10:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
39 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH
85th Percentile Speed
42 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
81
Number of Survey Samples
205
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
3
Annual Collision Rate
1 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.276
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
17,711 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ LOFTUS, MARSHALL, VALLEY
Crosswalks?
® ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
MODERATE
YES, BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED
YES, BOTH SIDES
YES, BOTH SIDES
On-Street Parking
Sidewalks?
Driveways?
1
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
0.560 miles
64 feet
NONE
YES, AT ELLIS
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
GOOD
YES, BOTH SIDES
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
i
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET TEMPLE CITY BLVD
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM VALLEY BLVD
TO NORTH CITY LIMITS
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
9:OOAM Speed Justification
'
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
39 mph HIDDEN DWYS., TRUCK TRAFFIC, ADJ SEG
43 mph SPEED
10 mph Pace Speed
35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
74
'
Number of Survey Samples
204
COLLISION HISTORY
'
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
1
Annual Collision Rate
0.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.418
fl
I~
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
19,880 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES + 2WY LT LANE
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ VALLEY
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
MODERATE
On-Street Parking
NO PARKING
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SDIES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.110 miles
Width
64 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL
Field Study By JA Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional En~~giinyneer (Traffic).
~✓ii'///oi/,l~ 3 /4Z TF 2341
Vanessa Munoz
State Registration Number
1
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET VALLEY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 317/2006
FROM CHARLOTTE AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD
35
SPEED FACTORS
1
Date of Speed Survey
11/8/2005
Time of Speed Survey
1:OOPM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
35 mph
'
85th Percentile Speed
40 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
29-38
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
63
Number of Survey Samples
206
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Speed Justification
ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS,PEDS
Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
Total Collisions
' Annual Collision Rate
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
3 years
25
8.333 accidents/year
0.917
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traff ic
'
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
Crosswalks?
Pedestrian Traffic
Truck Traffic
On-Street Parking
'
Sidewalks?
Driveways?
1
29,289 Date Counted 11/8/2005
4 LANES + 2WY LT LANE
T.S. @ DELTA,WALNUT GROVE, MUSCATEL, IVAR,ROSEMEAD
ALL T.S.
MODERATE
LIGHT
BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED
YES, BOTH SIDES
BOTH SIDES,MANY
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
0.850 miles
77 feet
NONE
NONE
FAIR, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
FAIR
YES, BOTH SIDES
COMMERCIAL,CIVIC CENTER
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
1
I
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD F 36]
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET VALLEY BLVD
FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
TO STRANG AVENUE
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005
Time of Speed Survey
10:OOAM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
36 mph
85th Percentile Speed
41 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
69
Number of Survey Samples
203
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Speed Justification
ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., PEDS.
Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
13
Annual Collision Rate
4.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.450
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
26,357 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES AND LT LANES
Type of Traffic Control
T.S.@ROSEMEAD,HART, MISSION, RIO HONDO,TEMPLE CITY
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
MODERATE
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, MANY
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
1.000 miles
77 feet
NONE
NONE
FAIR, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
FAIR
YES, BOTH SIDES
COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
FROM SAN GABRIEL BLVD TO RUSH STREET
37
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph
Time of Speed Survey
2:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
44 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED, VERT. CURVE.,PEDS.
'
85th Percentile Speed
49 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
39-48 Recommended Speed Limit 45 mph
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
68
Number of Survey Samples
138
'
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
4
Annual Collision Rate
1.333 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Mlles
0.286
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traff ic
17,241 Date Counted 11/10/2005
'
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
4 LANES + 2WY LT LANE
T.S. @ SAN GABRIEL, RUSH
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
MODERATE
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
NO PARKING (MOST OF SEGMENT)
'
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, FEW
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.740 miles
'
Width
Vertical Curve?
65 feet
YES, UPHILL NORTHBOUND
Horizontal Curve?
SLIGHT, SOUTH OF VILLAGE
Visibility
FAIR, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
UNIVERSITY, GOLF COURSE, COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST
Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as
a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
TE 2341
Vanessa Munoz',.,/
ate State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 38
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET WALNUT GROVE AVEN
UE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM RUSH STREET
TO GARVEY AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
11:OOAM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
39 mph HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG.
'
85th Percentile Speed
43 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
36-45 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
75
Number of Survey Samples
187
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
8
'
Annual Collision Rate
2.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.591
'
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
16,253 Date Counted 11/10/2005
Number of Lanes
Type of Traffic Control
4 LANES UNDIVIDED,DIVIDED S/O EDISON
T.S.@ RUSH, EDISON,KLINGERMAN,FERN,GARVEY
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
'
Truck Traff ic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES-HEAVY-RESTRICTED
'
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
BOTH SIDES, FEW
1
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment 0.760 miles
Width 65 feet
Vertical Curve?
NONE
Horizontal Curve?
NONE
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State Qf California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Number
Vanessa Munoz
I
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 39
'
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET WALNUT GROVE AVEN
UE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006
'
FROM GARVEY AVENUE
TO HELLMAN AVENUE
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
2:OOPM Speed Justification
'
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
39 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., PEDS.
44 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40125" mph
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
70
Number of Survey Samples
172
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
17
'
Annual Collision Rate
5.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
1.218
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
25,495 Date Counted 11/17/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S. @ GARVEY, HELLMAN
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
MODERATE
'
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
'
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
0.500 miles
65 feet
NONE
NONE
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
FAIR
YES, BOTH SIDES
MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
1
1
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
324~,0-6 TE 2341
Vanessa
State Registration Number
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE
FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO VALLEY BLVD
3/7/2006
40
SPEED FACTORS
'
Date of Speed Survey
11/8/2005
Time of Speed Survey
11:OOAM
'
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
40 mph
45 mph
10 mph Pace Speed
35-44
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
69
Number of Survey Samples
207
Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Speed Justification
ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS.,VERT. &
HORIZ. CURVE
Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
' COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3 years
Total Collisions 9
' Annual Collision Rate 3 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.483
1
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 23,293 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes 4 LANES - UNDIVIDED, DIVIDED SOUTH OF MARSHALL
Type of Traffic Control T.S., @ HELLMAN, MARSHALL, VALLEY
Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
NO PKG SOUTH 1/2, NORTH 1/2 OK
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0.730 miles
Width
65 feet
Vertical Curve?
YES,AT 1-10
Horizontal Curve?
YES, AT 1-10
Visibility
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions
FAIR
Lighting
YES, BOTH SIDES
Adjacent Land Use
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 41
'
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 30/2006
'
FROM VALLEY BLVD
TO MISSION BLVD
SPEED FACTORS
Date of Speed Survey
11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
9:OOAM Speed Justification
'
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
85th Percentile Speed
39 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT.
44 mph LANES
10 mph Pace Speed
35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
69
Number of Survey Samples
207
COLLISION HISTORY
'
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
5
'
Annual Collision Rate
1.667 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.492
'
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
18,561 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S.@ VALLEY, MISSION,WELLS/EDMOND
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S.
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
I
ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
Width
Vertical Curve?
Horizontal Curve?
Visibility
Roadway Conditions
Lighting
Adjacent Land Use
0.500 miles
65 feet
NONE
NONE
GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES
MAINLY ON WEST SIDE
RESIDENTIAL
fl
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of CAlifornia as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Vanessa Munoz
State
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE
FROM MISSION BLVD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
3/7/2006
42
Date of Speed Survey
11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Time of Speed Survey
1:OOPM Speed Justification
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)
40 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., HORIZ.
85th Percentile Speed
45 mph CURVE
10 mph Pace Speed
37-46 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph
'
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace
75
Number of Survey Samples
154
COLLISION HISTORY
'
Number of Years Studied
3 years
Total Collisions
0
'
Annual Collision Rate
0 accidents/year
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles
0.000
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
14,061 Date Counted 11/8/2005
Number of Lanes
4 LANES - UNDIVIDED
'
Type of Traffic Control
T.S.@ MISSION ; STOP @ GRAND
Crosswalks?
@ ALL T.S. AND STOPS
Pedestrian Traffic
LIGHT
Truck Traffic
LIGHT
On-Street Parking
BOTH SIDES
'
Sidewalks?
YES, BOTH SIDES
Driveways?
YES, BOTH SIDES
' ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment 0.290 miles
Width 56 feet
Vertical Curve? NONE
Horizontal Curve? YES, N. AND S. OF HALKET
Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS
Roadway Conditions FAIR
Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY
' Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL,COMMERCIAL NORTH OF GRAND
Field Study By ST Checked By VM
' CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within
the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State O 'California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
J / /Q6 TE 2341
' Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
Engineering and Traffic Survey
' City of Rosemead
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
DE ADELENA STREET
E-W
ROSEMEAD TO ELLIS
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/3/2005
Begin 1:00PM End 2:OOPM
Weather CLEAR
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 30 MPH
85th % 32 MPH
1OMPH 26 35
% in Pace 91%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentane
65
0
0%
100.0'>.,
0
0%
100.0,-,
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
1000%
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
100-C.''
0
0%
100.0`,,,
50
0
0%
100.0°/0
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
1000%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
40
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
1
2%
100.0%
0
0%
97.9%
35
x
x
0
0
0
5
11%
97.9%
0
1
2%
87.2%
0
0%
85.1%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
9
19%
85.1%
x
o
2
4%
66.0%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
01
0
0
0
0
13
28%
61.7%
x
x
o
3
6%
34.0%
x
x
o
0
0
5
11%
27.7%
x
x
2
4%
17.0%
x
x
o
3
6%
12.8%
25
0
0
0
3
6%
6.4%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0 0°e
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
47
100
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
DEL MAR AVENUE
GRAVES AVE TO GARVEY AVE
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/3/2005
Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN
Weather CLEAR
Recorded by TSI -S.W.
50th % 35 MPH
85th % 38 MPH
1OMPH 30 39
% in Pace 85%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
o
2
2%
100.0%
0
0%
98.3%
40
x
x
o
0
4
3%
98.3%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
8
7%
95.0%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
8%
88.4%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
6%
80.2%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
20
17%
74.4%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
11
9%
57.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
11
9%
48.8%
x
x
x
x
o
0
6
5%
39.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
11
9%
34.7%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
8
7%
25.6%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
11
9%
19.0%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
8
7%
9.9%
x
x
x
0
4
3%
3.3%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
00%
X - East/N
orth bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
121
100
N
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street DEL MAR AVENUE Date 11/2/2005 50th % 38 MPH
Location Begin 10:OOAN End 11:00AN 85th % 42 MPH
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 33 42
Remarks GARVEY TO HELLMAN Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 78%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
.00/0
100.0°i,
0
0%
100 0'',
0
0%
100.01"D
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
o
0
3
1%
100.0%
45
x
x
x
x
x
x
6
3%
98.6%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
6%
95.7%
x
x
x
x
o
0
6
3%
90.0%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
16
8%
87.1%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
9
4%
79.4%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
10
0
01
1
24
11%
75.1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
01
0
1
21
10%
63.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
9%
53.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
18
9%
45.0%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
01
0
0
0
12
6%
36.4%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
7%
30.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
19
9%
23.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
10
5%
14.4%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
8
4%
9.6%
x
x
o
3
1%
5.7%
30
x
x
o
0
0
5
2%
4.3%
x
x
o
3
1%
1.9%
x
1
0%
0.5%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
a
o%
o.0r
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/N
orth bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
209
100
e
r
i
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
EARLSWOOD DRIVE
N-S
WAR AVE TO ROSEMEAD PL
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/10/2005
Begin 10:OOAIV End 1:OOAM
Weather CLEAR
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 27 MPH
85th % 30 MPH
1OMPH 23 32
% in Pace 89%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
Oo/p
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
40
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100011,
0
0%
100 l'
0
0%
100.6
35
0
0%
100.0
0
1
1%
100.0
-
0
1
1 %
98.6
x
o
2
3%
97 2
x
x
o
3
4%
94.4
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
10
14%
903
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
8%
76 4`1.-
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
7
10%
68.1'%
X
x
x
x
x
0
0
7
10%
58.3°,Io
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
7
10%
48.6%
25
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
101
14
19%
38.9%
x
0
o
x
4
6%
19.4%
x
0
0
0
4
6%
13.9%
0
1
1%
8.3%
x
X1
1
2
3%
6.9%
20
x
o
0
3
4%
4.2%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
00%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
00/
0 n1
X - EastlNorth bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
72
100
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street ELLIS LANE Date 1/10/2006
Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR
Remarks OLNEY ST TO TEMPLE CITY BLVD Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 29 MPH
85th % 32 MPH
1OMPH 23 32
% in Pace 83%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0-'',
0
0%
100 01%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0°%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 U,
40
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
1000
0
0%
100.0
X
1
1%
100.0,%1,
x
O
O
3
2%
99.2'/j
35
x
x
0
0
0
5
4%
96-9t,
x
x
x
0
4
3%
93.1
x
x
o
0
4
3%
901%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
9%
87.044,
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
8
6%
779%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
25
19%
71.8%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
8%
52.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o l
o
0
0
0
11
8%
45.0%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
8
6%
36.6%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
8%
30.5%
25
x
x
x
z
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
12
9%
22.1%
X
X
X
0
0
0
0
7
5%
13.0%
X
X
0
0
0
5
4%
7.6%
0
O
2
2%
3.8%
X
0
2
2%
2.3%
20
X
1
1%1
0.8%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed
131
100
1
n
u
1
1
t
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street EMERSON PLACE Date 11/2/2005 50th % 30 MPH
Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAIV 85th % 32 MPH
Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 25 34
Remarks NEW AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD Recorded by TSI - S. W. % in Pace 90%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative:
Percents
65
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100-0%;
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
40
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
1%
100.0%
0
0%
98.6%
0
1
1%
98.6%
35
0
0
0
3
4%
97.2%
x
x
x
3
4%
93.0%
x
o
2
3%
88.7%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
10%
85.9%
x
x
x
o
0
5
7%
76.1%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
14
20%
69.0%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
15%
49.3%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
10%
33.8%
x
x
0
0
0
5
7%
23.9%
X
x
o
0
0
5
7%
16.9%
25
x
x
x
o
0
5
7%
9.9%
0
0
2
3%
2.8%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - North bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
71,
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street ENCIN1TA AVENUE Date 11/2/2005 50th % 29 MPH
Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th % 32 MPH
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 24 33
Remarks MISSION RD TO LOWER AZUSA RD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 89%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
1000-/1
0
0%
100.0'so
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
40
0
0%
1000%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
35
x
0
101
3
5%
100.0%
0
0%
95.5%
x
o
0
3
5%
95.5%
x
0
0
0
0
5
8%
90.9%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
11%
83.3%
30
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
8
12%
72.7%
X
x
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
9
14%
60.6%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
9
14%
47.0%
x
x
x
0
0
5
8%
33.3%
x
x
o
3
5%
25.8%
25
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
8
12%
21.2%
x
0
1 1
2
3%
9.1%
0
1
2%
6.1%
0
0%
4.5%
x
1
2%
4.5%
20
0
0
2
3%
3.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
00%
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
66
100
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
GARVEY AVENUE
E-W
WEST CITY LIMIT TO DEL MAR AVE
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/10/2005
Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM
Weather CLEAR
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 34 MPH
85th % 38 MPH
1OMPH 30 39
% in Pace 72%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100,0'/0
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 0
55
0
0%
1000
0
0%
1000
<
0
0%
100 0','
0
0%
too 0``~,
0
0%
100-01,~,
50
0
0%
100.01",
0
0%
1o0.o`-
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
1000%
0
1
0%
100.0%
45
0
1
0%
99.5%
0
0%
990%
0
0%
990%
x
x
x
x
0
0
6
3%
990%
x
0
0
3
1%
961f-~
40
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3%
94 6"',
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
4%
91.2>'
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
8%
86.8
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
8
4%
78.9°%,
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
01
0
01
0
0
0
13
6%
75.0"%.,
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
12%
68 6
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
10%
56 4°/:
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
7%
46.1 °1o
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
01
01
16
8%
38.7%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
01
01
9
4%
30.9%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
O
O
O
O
01
0
15
7%
26.5%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
01
01
9
4%
191%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
11
5%
14.7%
x
x
x
0
4
2%
9.3%
X
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
8
4%
7.4%
25
x
x
x
x
o
5
2%
3.4%
0
1
0%
1.0%
0
1
0%
0.5%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound
Tot
al Observed
904
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street GARVEY AVENUE Date 11/10/2005 50th % 35 MPH
Location Begin 2:00PM End 3:OOPM 85th % 39 MPH
Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 30 39
Remarks DEL MAR AVE TO SAN GABRIEL Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 75%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0`4u
0
0%
100 0`.lo
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100-0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
1000%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
1000
0
0%
100 C
45
0
1
0%
100 C ,
x
o
2
1%
995'.
0
0
2
1%
986
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
7
3%
97.6-,-
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
7
3%
'
942
40
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
3%
91.0
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6%
88.1
x
x
x
x
0
10
01
0
0
10
0
0
12
6%
81°°
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
,
o
0
0
0
13
6%
76 2
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
10%
70.0%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
11%
60.5%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
10%
49.0%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
7%
39.0'!,,
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
16
8%
31 Vii`
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
11
5%
24. .
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
10
1 0
0
0
12
6%
19.C
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
10
5%
13.)
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
3%
8.6`
x
o
2
1%
5.7;4:
x
x
x
0
4
2%
4.8%
25
x
x
x
0
0
5
2%
2.9%
x
1
0%
0.5%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
00%1
X - EasUNorth bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
210
100
jEffM
1
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street
GARVEYAVENUE
Date 11/10/2005
50th % 34 MPH
Location
Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM
85th % 38 MPH
Direction
E-W
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH 29 38
Remarks
SAN GABRIEL TO WALNUT GROVE
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
% in Pace 76%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0° o
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
0%
100.0%
x
x
x
0
0
5
2%
99.5%
x
x
o
0
4
2%
97.1%
40
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
8
4%
95.1%
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
3%
911%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
0
0
16
8%
88.3%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
9
4%
80.5%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
7%
76.1%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
26
13%
69.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
9%
56.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6%
47.8%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
11%
41.5%
x
x
x
x
0
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
12
6%
30.7%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
01
0
10
1
13
6%
24.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
13
6%
18.5%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
3%
12.2%
x
x
x
x
0
0
6
3%
8.8%
X
0
0
0
4
2%
5.9%
25
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
8
4%
3.9%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0°10
X - North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
205
100
r~
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street GARVEY AVENUE Date 11/9/2005
Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM
Direction E-W Weather CLEAR
Remarks WALNUT GROVE TO EAST CITY LIM Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 35 MPH
85th % 39 MPH
1OMPH 29 38
% in Pace 71%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100,0-:
0
0%
100 0
55
0
0%
1000
"
0
0%
1000
0
0%
100-0ib
0
0%
100.0`/0
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
1
0%
100.0%
45
2
j
0
0
4
2%
99.5%
.
x
.
0
0
3
1%
97.5%
0
0
2
1%
96.1%
x
0
0
0
0
0
6
3%
95.1%
x
x
0
0
4
2%
92.2%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
101
9
4%
90.2%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
1 1
8
4%
85.8%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
7%
81.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
11
5%
75.0%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
10%
69.6%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
13%
59.8%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
01
0
0
01
0
01
0
0
0
17
8%
47.1%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
6%
38.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
9%
32.8%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
3%
24.0%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
10
5%
20.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
10
5%
153%
x
x
x
x
01
0
6
3%
10.8%
x
x
o
0
0
5
2%
7.8%
x
x
x
0
4
2%
54%
25
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
7
3%
3.4%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0 0°/
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
204
100
" .
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
CITY OF
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date
Begin End
Weather
Recorded by
50th % #DIV/0! MPH
85th % #DIV/0! MPH
1OMPH 56 65
% in Pace #DIV/0!
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
#DIV10!
#DIV/O!
o
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIVlO!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
60
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
55
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
50
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
45
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
40
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
35
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
0
#DIV/01.
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
30
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV10!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
o
#DIV/01
#DIV/O!
25
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV10!
#DIV10!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
20
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
15
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
X - East/North bound 0 - WestlSouth Bound Tot
al Observed
0
100
I
F
1
n
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street GRAND AVENUE Date 11/9/2005 50th % 34 MPH
Location Begin 11:00AN End 12:OOPN 85th % 38 MPH
Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 29 38
Remarks CHARLOTTE TO ROSEMEAD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 81%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 0°/
0
0%
100.0 -
60
0
0%
'
-1-00(l
0
0%
100.
0
0%
100 u
0
0%
100.0'
0
0%
100.0'/
55
0
0%
100.011
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
100-0-/,
0
0%
100-0'
0
0%
100 0
50
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
100.0`::
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
x
1
2%
100.0%
0
0%
98.4%
x
1
2%
98.4%
x
x
2
3%
96.8%
0
0%
93.5%
40
0
1
2%
93.5%
0
0
2
3%
91.9%
x
x
x
o
4
6%
88.7%
x
0
0
0
0
0
6
10%
82.3%
x
o
0
3
5%
72.6%
35
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
9
15%
67.7%
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
11%
53.2%
x
x
x
o
4
6%
41.9%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
15%
35.5%
x
1
2%
21.0%
30
x
o
0
3
5%
19.4%
X
0
0
0
4
6%
14.5%
x
o
2
3%
8.1%
x
1
2%
4.8%
x
1
2%
3.2%
25
x
1
2%
1.6%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/N
ort
h bound 0 - West/South Bound
Tot
al Observed
62
100
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
HELLMAN AVENUE
E-W
NEW TO WALNUT GROVE
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/2/2005
Begin 1:00PM End 2:OOPM
Weather CLEAR
Recorded by TSI -S.W.
50th % 29 MPH
85th % 33 MPH
1OMPH 25 34
% in Pace 86%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%a
100.0°/
50
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
1000
'
0
0%
100 0°~
0
0%
100.011,/~.
45
0
0%
100.01/,
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
40
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
1
1%
100.0%
35
x
x
o
0
0
10
6
6%
99.0%
x
x
x
x
0
10
0
7
7%
93.1%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
7%
86.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
a
o
0
0
0
0
12
12%
79.4%
x
x
o
0
0
5
5%
67.6%
30
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
11
11%
62.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
13%
52.0%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
10
10%
39.2%
x
x
o
0
0
0
6
6%
29.4%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
8
8%
23.5%
25
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
9
9%
15.7%
x
01
1
2
2%
6.9%
x
1
1 %
4.9%
x
1
1%
3.9%
x
x
2
2%
2.9%
20
x
1
1%
1.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0 ,0,,,
X - East/N
ort
h bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
102
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street JA CKSON A VENUE Date 11/2/2005 50th % 30 MPH
Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM 85th % 35 MPH
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 26 35
Remarks GRAVES TO GARVEY Recorded by TSI -S.W. % in Pace 79%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
1
1%
100.0%
0
0%
98.6%
40
0
1
1%
98.6%
0
1
1%
97.2%
x
0
0
0
4
6%
95.8%
0
0%
90.3%
x
o
0
3
4%a
90.3%
35
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
8
11%
86.1%
x
o
0
3
4%
75.0%
x
o
2
3%
70.8%
x
x
x
x
o
0
01
01
01
9
13%
68.1%
x
x
2
3%
55.6%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
18%
52.8%
x
0
0
0
4
6%
34.7%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
8
11%
29.2%
x
o
2
3%
18.1%
x
x
o
0
0
0
6
8%
15.3%
25
x
x
x
x
0
5
7%
6.9%a
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%a
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - Eas
t/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
72
100
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
LOFTUS STREET
E-W
TEMPLE CITY TO EAST CITY LIMIT
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/2/2005
50th %
Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM
85th %
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
% in Pace
35 MPH
39 MPH
30 39
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
1000%
60
0
0%
1000"/",
0
0%
100 r
0
0%
100 G"',
0
0%
100 0 ,
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0ro
0
0%
100.0ro
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
Ora
100.0ro
0
0io
100.0io
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0
2
1 %
100.0%
0
0%
98.6%
x
1
1%
98.6%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
7%
97.8%
x
o
2
1%
91.3%
40
x
x
0
0
0
0
6
4%
- 89.9%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
8
6%
85.5%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
9%
79.7%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
10
7%
710%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
9%
63.8%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
55.1
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
42.0%
x
x
x
x
x
0
6
14%
31.9%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
9
27.5%
x
x
x
x
0
5
21.0%
30
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
9
7%
17.4%
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
8
6%
10.9%
x
x
o
3
2%
5.1%
x
1
1 %
2.9%
x
1
1%
2.2%
25
x
x
2
1%
1.4%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0/a
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - Eas
t/N
ort
h bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
138
100
fl
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street LOWER AZUSA ROAD
Date 11/2/2005
Location
Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM
Direction E-W
Weather CLEAR
Remarks ROSEMEAD TO ENCINITA
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 39 MPH
85th % 42 MPH
10MPH 34 43
% in Pace 79%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
.
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100 C~
0
0%
100 C '
0
0%
100,C
0
0%
1006.
0
0%
100 6-
50
x
0
2
1%
100 C"
x
1
1%
98.61-
0 0
0%
979``,
0
0%
97.9 :
x
o
2
1%
97.90'
45
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
6%
96.6%
0
0
0
3
2%
90.3%
x
x
x
o
0
5
3%
88,3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
14
10%
84,8°/,)
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
01
0
10
7%
75.2°4~
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
15%
68.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
12%
53.1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
12%
40.7%
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
4%
28.3%
x
0
0
0
0
5
3%
24.1%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
01
01
13
9%
20.7%
x
x
o
0
4
3%
11.7%
0
1
1 %
9.0%
x
x
o
0
0
5
3%
8.3%
x
o
2
1 %
4.8%
30
x
x
0
0
4
3%
3.4%
x
1
1%1
0.7%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0°i°
0.0°i°
X - Eas
t/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
145
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
MARSHALL STREET Date 11/8/2005 50th % 35 MPH
Begin 10:00AN End 11:00AN 85th % 38 MPH
E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 29 38
DELTA TO WALNUT GROVE Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 88%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100 C''
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100 C,11
0
0%
-
100 0`
0
0%
100 0 ;t:
55
0
0%
100 0`71
0
0%
100 01~%
0
0%
1000%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
°
1
1%
100.0%
0
0%
98.9%
40
x
x
x
o
4
4%
98.9%
x
0
0
0
4
4%
94.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
01
0
10
11%
89.9%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
10%
78.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
8
9%
68.5%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
01
15
17%
59.6%
x
0
01
0
0
0
6
7%
42.7%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
9
10%
36.0%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
10%
25.8%
°
1
1%
15.7%
30
x
x
o
0
0
0
6
7%
14.6%
x
x
o
0
0
5
6%
7.9%
X
Of
1
2
2%
2.2%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
00%1
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East
/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
89
100
- I
II=
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street MARSHALL STREET Date 11/8/2005 50th % 30 MPH
Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th % 34 MPH
Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 26 35
Remarks WALNUT GROVE TO ROSEMEAD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 88%
Number
Vehicle
1
X
x
2
2%
100.0%
x
x
2
2%
97.8%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
7
8%
95.7%
x
x
01
01
4
4%
88.2%
x
x
x
x
o
0
6
6%
83.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
14%
77.4%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
7
8%
63.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
13
14%
55.9%
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
10
11%
41.9%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
01
01
10
11%
31.2%
0
0
0
3
3%
20.4%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
10%
17.2%1
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
6%
7.5%
0
1
1%
1.1%
- East/North bound 0-
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street
MARSHALL STREET
Date 1113/2005
50th %
Location
Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM
85th %
Direction
E-W
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH
Remarks
ROSEMEAD TO HART
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
% in Pace
35 MPH
38 MPH
30 39
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulativo
Percentao
65
0
0%
100 0
0
0%
100.c ,
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100 c
0
0%
100 0
50
0
0%
100 0',.
0
0%
100 0's
0
0%
100.0°L,
0
0%
100.0^.4:
0
0%
100.0%
45
x
1
1%
100.0%
x
7
1 %
99.3%
x
1
1 %
98.5%
x
x
x
o
0
x
6
4%
97.8%
x
0
2
1%
93.4%
40
0
1
1%
92.0%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
5%
91.2%
x
x
x
o
0
01
01
01
01
0
0
11
8%
86.1%
x
x
x
o
01
0
0
0
0
9
7%
78.1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
-L
.L
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
11%
71.5%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
01
0
21
15%
60.6%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
10
7%
45.3%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
10
7%
38,0%
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
14
10%
30.7%
X
x
o
0
0
5
4%
20.4%
30
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
4%
16.8%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
5%
12.4%1
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
4%
7.3%
x
1
1%
2.9%
x
1
1 %
2.2%
25
x
x
2
1%
1.5%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
137
1 00
mum
I
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street MARSHALL STREET
Date 11/3/2005
50th %
Location
Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM
85th %
Direction E-W
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH
Remarks HART TO RIO HONDO
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
% in Pace
34 MPH
37 MPH
29 38
84%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
1%
100.0%
0
0%
98.9%
40
x
0
2
2%
98.9%
x
x
x
3
3%
96.6%
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
7
8%
93.2%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
8
9%
85.2%
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
8%
76.1%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x1
0
10
0
0
0
13
15%
68.2%
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
01
9
10%
53.4%
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
7%
43.2%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
15%
36.4%
0
0
2
2%
21.6%
30
x
x
o
3
3%
19.3%
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
7%
15.9%
0
01
1
2
2%
9.1%
0
1
1%
6.8%
x
x
2
2%
5.7%
25
x
x
o
3
3%
3.4%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
00%
X - East/N
orth bound 0 - West/South Bound
Tot
al Observed
88
100
;::i _ ,
I I
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street MISSION DRIVE Date 11/912005 50th % 39 MPH
Location Begin 10:OOAN End 11:00AN 85th % 43 MPH
Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 34 43
Remarks WEST CITY LIM TO WALNUT GROVE Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 74%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 0°/
50
0
0%
1000,111
0
0%
1000,
x
x
0
0
0
5
3%
100 0
x
x
2
1%
97 0'
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
7
4%
95.9
45
x
x
o
0
0
5
3%
91.7
x
x
x
o
4
2%
88.8:%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
8
5%
864"i
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
15
9%
81.7
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
9
5%
72.8"%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
12%
67.5',
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
8%
55.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
21
12%
47.9%
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
4%
35.5%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
12
7%
32.0%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
01
0
0
0
12
7%
24.9%
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
5%
17.8%
0
1
1%
12.4%
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
8
5%
11,8%
x
x
0
0
4
2%
7.1%
30
x
0
0
0
0
5
3%
4.7%
x
x
01
1
3
2%
1.8%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
00/
0 0"
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
169
100
y„
11
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street MISSION DRIVE Date 11/8/2005
Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM
Direction E-W Weather CLEAR
Remarks WALNUT GROVE TO ROSEMEAD Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 39 MPH
85th % 44 MPH
1OMPH 36 45
% in Pace 68%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0`/n
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
100.0`
0
0%
100.0'i
60
0
0%
100-01,
0
0%
1000
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
100 0
0
0%
100 0
55
0
0%
100-0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
1%
100.0%
x
z
x
3
2%
99.4%
x
o
2
1%
97.8%
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
3%
96.6%
45
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
01
0
0
0
0
0
14
8%
93.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
10
6%
85.5%
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
7
4%
79.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
18
10%
76.0%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
9
5%
65.9%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
01
0
17
9%
60.9%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
01
0
0
0
0
14
8%
51.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
Bola
43.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
10111
10
6%
35.8%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
5%
30.2%
35
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
7%
25.1%
x
x
x
0
101
0
0
0
8
4%
18.4%
x
x
01
0
11 0
5
3%
14.0%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
8
4%
11.2%
x
x
0
10
1
4
2%
6.7%
30
x
0
0
10
1
4
2%
4.5%
0
0
0
1
1
3
2%
2.2%
0
1
1%
0.6%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/N
orth bound 0. West/South Bound To
tal Observed
179
100
1
1
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
MISSION DRIVE
E-W
ROSEMEAD TO VALLEY
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/3/2005
Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN
Weather CLEAR
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 40 MPH
85th % 44 MPH
1OMPH 35 44
% in Pace 73%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
1000%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 01"
0
0%
10001
50
o
1
-1%
100 r'_
x
o
2
1%
99.4
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
3%
98:
IC
o
2
1%
94.9
x
x
x
x
o
5
3%
93 E
45
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
o
g
5%
90 P'
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
11
6%
86 4'
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
12
7%
80.1
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
9%
73.°."
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
10
6%
64.2"
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
11%
58.5
x
x
x
x'
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
12%
47 t
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
12
7%
35-8'
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
o
B
5%
29.0
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
9
5%
24.4'
35
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
10
6%
19--
x
x
x
o
0
5
3%
13 6-
x
x
x
0
0
5
3%
108
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
3%
8.C
0
0%
4.5
30
x
o
01
1
3
2%
4.5
x
x
x
o
4
2%
2.8
x
1
1%
06-
0
0%
0.0
0
0%
0.0
25
0
0%
0 0
0
0%
00
0
0%
0.0"'
0
0%
0.0
0
0%
00
20
0
0%
001
0
0%
00,
0
0%
0.0,1-
0
0%
0 0
0
0%
0C"
15
0
0%.1
0.00
X - East/Nort
h bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
176
100
t
1
t
1
f
e
1
t
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street MUSCATEL AVENUE
Date 11/8/2005
Location
Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM
Direction E-W
Weather CLEAR
Remarks MARSHALL TO GRAND
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 30 MPH
85th % 32 MPH
1OMPH 25 34
% in Pace 95%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
10001,11
0
0%
100 01-n
0
0%
1000 "
0
0%
100 0111-
60
0
0%
10&W4,
0
0%
100 0'.,
0
0%
100 0` ,
0
0%
100.0"I,
0
0%
100.0" 1
55
0
0%
100 014-
0
0%
100.0'-.,
0
0%
100 0''
0
0%
100 0"-'
0
0%
1000
50
0
0%
100 0
0
0%
100 0
0
0%
' -
1000
0
0%
1000
0
0%
100 0
45
0
0%
100 0
0
0%
100011,
0
0%
100 0 ,
0
0%
100 G
0
0%
100 C
40
0
0%
100.0 o
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 0'!
0
1
2%
100 0
35
x
o
2
3%
984
x
x
x
0
4
6%
95.
x
o
2
3%
88.9` o
x
x
o
0
0
0
6
10%
85.7%
x
x
x
x
x
0
6
10%
76.2%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
12
19%
66.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
12
19%
47.6%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
11%
28.6%
0
0
0
3
5%
17.5%
x
o
x
3
5%
12.7%
25
x
x
x
0
0
5
8%
7.9%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
1$
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
63
100
N[MMM
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street NEW AVENUE
Date 11/2/2005
50th %
Location
Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM
85th %
Direction N-S
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH
Remarks GRAVES TO GARVEY
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
% in Pace
35 MPH
38 MPH
31 40
79%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
10000/1,
0
0%
100
0
0%
100 0'
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100.0'"
60
0
0%
100 0'"
0
0%
1000
0
0%
10001,
0
0%
100 0`;,,
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100 C"
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100
0
0%
100(.
45
0
0%
100 0
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100 C
x
0
0
3
3%
100 C
°
1
1%
97 '
40
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
7%
96
x
x
0
10
0
5
5%
89 -
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
10
10%
84(-
x
x
o
0
0
0
6
6%
75 0>
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
11%
69.2''
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
16%
58.7
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
8
8%
42.3°
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
6%
34.6%
X
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
10
10%
28.8%
x
o
2
2%
19.2%
30
x
x
x
o
0
01
1
6
6%
17.3%
x
x
0
0
4
4%
11.5%
x
x
x
0
4
4%
7.7%
0
0%
3.8%
x
1
1%
3.8%
25
x
x
x
3
3%
2.9%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East Morth bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
104,
100
r
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
RAMONA BOULEVARD
E-W
WALNUT GROVE TO IVAR
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/10/2005 50th % 30 MPH
Begin 11:00AN End 12:OOPN 85th % 32 MPH
Weather CLEAR 10MPH 25 34
Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 93%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
40
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
1%
100.0%
x
1
1 %
98.6%
0
0%
97.3%
35
x
0
2
3%
97.3%
x
0
0
0
4
5%
94.5%
x
1
1 %
89.0%
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
8%
87.7%
X
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
12%
79.5%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
19%
67-1%
X
x
o
0
17
0
0
7
10%
47.9%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
8
11%
38.4%
x
x
0
0
4
5%
27.4%
x
x
o
0
0
0
6
8%
21.9%
25
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
9
12%
13.7%
0
1
1%
1.4%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
00%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - Wes USouth Bound Total Observed
73
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street RIO HONDO AVENUE Date 11/3/2005 50th % 30 MPH
Location Begin 11:00AN End 12:OOPN 85th % 35 MPH
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 24 33
Remarks OLNEY TO VALLEY Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 78%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
40
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
x
0
0
0
5
6%
100.0%
0
1
1%1
93.9%
x
x
x
3
4%
92.7%
35
o
01
01
01
4
5%
89.0%
0
1
1%
84.1%
x
x
o
0
0
5
6%
82.9%
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
7
9%
76.8%
x
x
x
x
0
5
6%
68.3%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
13
16%
62.2%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
12
15%
46.3%
X
x
x
o
0
0
6
7%
31.7%
0
0
2
2%
24.4%
x
0
0
0
0
5
6%
22.0%
25
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
9%
15.9%
x
o
2
2%
7.3%
x
1
1%
4.9%
0
0%
3.7%
x
x
2
2%
3.7%
20
x
1
1%
1.2%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0',x:
15
0
0%
0 o
X East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
82
00
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street ROSEMEAD PLACE Date 11/10/2005 50th % 34 MPH
Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th % 37 MPH
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 29 38
Remarks GARVEY TO EARLSWOOD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 88%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
45
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
1%
100.0
0
0%
98.8
40
x
0
2
2%
98 8
x
o
2
2%
96.3'-
L
x
x
0
0
0
6
7%
93 8''
-
x
x
x
x
o
5
6%
864
x
x
x
x
o
5
6%
80.2
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
19%
74.' ,
x
x
x
x
0
0
6
7%
55.6'
x
x
x
x
0
0
6
7%
48.1
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
01
0
0
11
14%
40.7;%
x
x
0
0
4
5%
27.2%
30
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
10%
22.2%
x
x
0
0
0
5
6%
12.3%
x
o
0
3
4%
6.2%
0
0%
2.5°!.
-
0
0%
2.5
25
0
0
2
2%
2.5
0
0%
0.0
0
0%
0 0'
0
0%
0.01s
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
81
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street
RUSH STREET
Date 11/3/2005
50th % 39 MPH
Location
Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM
85th % 44 MPH
Direction
E-W
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH 35 44
Remarks
SAN GABRIEL TO WALNUT GROVE
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
% in Pace 74%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
D
-0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0
0
3
2%
100.0%
x
o
0
3
2%
97.7%
0
0
2
20/a
95.5%
x
o
2
2%
94.0%
x
o
2
2%
92.5%
45
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
5%
91.0%
X
x
x
x
x
o
0
7
5%
86.5%
0
0
2
2%
81.2%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
7
5%
79.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
9
7%
74.4%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
01
20
15%
677%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
11
8%
52.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
11%
44.4%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
9
7%
33.1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
11
8%
26.3%
35
x
x
x
o
0
01
01
7
5%
18.0%
0
1
1%
12.8%
x
x
2
2%
12.0%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
5%
10.5%
x
1
1%
5.3%
30
x
x
o
0
0
5
4%
4.5%
x
1
1%
0.8%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
D
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
o
0%
0.0%
o
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - Eas
t/Nort
h bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
133
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street
SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD
Date 11/3/2005
50th %
Location
Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM
85th %
Direction
E-W
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH
Remarks
SOUTH CITY LIMIT TO DELTA
Recorded by TSI -S.W.
% in Pace
44 MPH
48 MPH
39 48
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
x
o
3
2%
100.0%
x
0
0
0
4
2%
98.5%
50
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
9
5%
96.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
-
10
5%
91.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
10
5%
86.8%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
7
4%
81.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
13
7%
78.2%
45
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
101
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
23
12%
71.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
11%
59.9%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
6%
48.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
8%
43.1%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
8
4%
35.0%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
8%
31.0%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
12
6%
23.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
9
5%
17.3%
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
3%
12.7%
x
x
x
0
01
0
0
7
4%
9.6%
35
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
9
5%
6.1%
x
x
o
3
2%
1.5%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
30
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/Nort
h bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
197
100
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD
RUSH TO GARVEY
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/3/2005
50th %
Begin 10:OOAM End 11:00AM
85th %
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH
Recorded by TSI - S.W.
% in Pace
39 MPH
44 MPH
35 44
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage.
65
0
0%
10&C
0
0%
100.04.•
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
o
0
3
2%
100.0%
x
1
1%
98.3%
x
0
0
0
0
5
3%
97.8%
45
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
7
4%
95.0%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
o
a
o
14
8%
91.2%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
9
5%
814%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
12%
78.5%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
12
7%
66.9%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
01
0
15
8%
60.2%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
18
10%
51.9%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
10
6%
42.0%
x
x
0
0
0
5
3%
36.5%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
11
6%
33.7%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
a
0
12
7%
27.6%
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
3%
21.0%
X
x
x
0
0
5
3%
17.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
8
4%
14.9%
x
x
x
o
0
5
3%
10.5%
30
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
8
4%
7.7%
x
0
0
0
4
2%
3.3%
x
o
2
1%
1.1%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0 0%
X East/Norlh bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
181
100
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/3/2005 50th % 39 MPH
Begin 11:00AN End 12:00PN 85th % 42 MPH
Weather CLEAR 10MPH 34 43
GARVEY TO HELLMAN Recorded by TSI - S.W. % in Pace 76%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%a
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
I
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x x
o
01
1
3
1%
100.0%
45
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
8
4%
98.5%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
7
3%
94.6%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
8
4%
91.1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
9%
87.2%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
9
4%
77.8%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
11%
73.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
z
x
x
x
x
o
0
10
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
13%
62.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
20
10%
49.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
10
0
0
0
0
10
15
7%
39.4%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
10
5%
32.0%
35
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
7%
27.1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
10
5%
20.2%
x
x
x
x
0
0
6
3%
15.3%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
7
3%
12.3%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
10
1
8
4%
8.9%
30
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
3%
4.9%
x
o
2
1%
2.0%
x
x
2
1%
1.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed
203
1 00
SEEM
1
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
N-S
OLNEY TO VALLEY
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/2/2005 50th % 39 MPH
Begin 10:00AN End 11:00AN 85th % 42 MPH
Weather CLEAR 10MPH 35 44
Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 81%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage.
65
0
0%
100.0
0
0%
100 O~Y,
0
0%
100.0°x°
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0°x°
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100-0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
0
0
0
4
2%
100.0%
45
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
8
4%
98.0%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
11
50
94.1%
x
x
x
0
0
01
0
0
8
4%
88.8%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
21
10%
84.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
17
8%
74.6%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
21
10%
66.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
12%
56.1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
100
43.90
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6%
34.1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
14
7%
27.8%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
8%
21.0%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
3%
12.7%
X
x
0
0
01
0
0
7
3%
9.3%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
7
3%
5.9%
x
x
x
3
1%
2.4%
30
x
x
2
1%
1.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
00%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
00%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
205
100
1
1
1
1
Street
Location
Direction
Remarks
TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
N-S
VALLEY TO NORTH CITY LIMITS
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Date 11/2/2005 50th %
Begin 9:00AM End 10:00AN 85th %
Weather CLEAR 10MPH
Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace
39 MPH
43 MPH
35 44
74%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
o
2
1%
100.0%
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
3%
99.0%
45
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
11
5%
95.6%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
8
4%
901%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
01
01
01
0
11
5%
86.3%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6%
80.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
7%
74.5%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
10
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
12%
67.2%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
01
01
21
10%
54.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
18
9%
44.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
8%
35.8%
x
x
x
x
x
0
10
0
0
9
4%
27.9%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
14
7%
23.5%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
8
4%
16.7%
x
x
o
0
4
2%
12.7%
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
10
5%
10.8%
x
x
x
o
0
0
6
3%
5.9%
30
x
0
0
0
4
2%
2.9%
x
x
2
1%
1.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0`x',
15
0
0%
00-
X - East/Nort
h bound 0 WesUSouth Bound Tot
al Observed
204
100
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street VALLEY BOULEVARD
Date 11/8/2005
Location
Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM
Direction E-W
Weather CLEAR
Remarks CHARLOTTE TO ROSEMEAD
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 35 MPH
85th % 40 MPH
1OMPH 29 38
% in Pace 63%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0°/1,
0
0%
100.0`%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
O
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0°x°
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100 0
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
100 C
0
0%
1000
0
0%
100 0
45
x
x
x
x
x
o
6
3%
100.0°.6
x
x
x
0
4
2%
97 1%
x
x
o
0
4
2%
95.1'i
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
10
5%
93.21;
x
x
x
0
0
5
2%
88.3';,'
40
x
x
x
x
0
0
10
0
0
9
4%
85.9%
x
x
x
x
o
0
10
0
0
9
4%
81.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
8%
77.2%
x
x
x
x
0
10
0
0
0
9
4%
69.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
101
0
1
16
8%
65.0%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
9 0
57.3 0
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
1-
1
14
7%
48.5%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
8
4%
41.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
101
0
16
8%
37.9%
x
x
x
0
0
0
6
3%
30.1%
30
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6%
27.2%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
13
6%
20.9%
x
x
x
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
10
5%
14.6%
0
0
0
0
4
2%
9.7%
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
7
3%
7.8%
25
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
7
3%
4.4%
0
0
2
1%
1.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0 0
0.0°!°
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
206
100
II
1
u
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street
VALLEY BOULEVARD
Date 11/3/2005
50th % 36 MPH
Location
Begin 10:OOAN End 11:00AIV
85th % 41 MPH
Direction
E-W
Weather CLEAR
10MPH 33 42
Remarks
ROSEMEAD TO STRANG
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
% in Pace 69%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
0%
100.0%
45
x
x
x
x
o
0
6
3%
99.5%
x
x
O
0
1 1
4
2%
96.6%
x
x
o
0
1 1
4
2%
94.6%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
10
1 0
0
0
0
14
7%
92.6%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
8
4%
85.7%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1a
70
81.8%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
10
0
0
0
10
22
11%
74.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
18
9%
64.0%
x
x
x
o
0
0
10
0
0
9
4%
55.2%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6%
50.7%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
12%
44.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
1
1
10
5%
32.0°k
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
8
4%
27 1
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
10
5%
23 2'
x
x
01
0
101
0
6
3%
182
30
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
9
4%
153
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
8
4%
108
x
x
01
01
4
2%
69
x
1
0%
49
5
2%
44
25
x
x
x
01
1
4
2%
2.0 t:
0
0%
0.05,3
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - EasUN
orth bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
203
100
1
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11/3/2005 50th % 44 MPH
Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th % 49 MPH
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 39 48
Remarks SAN GABRIEL TO RUSH Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 68%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
1
1%
100.0%
55
0
0
0
3
2%
99.3`%_
0
0%
97
0
1
1%
971
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
50
964
x
0
2
1%
91 "1
50
x
x
x
o
0
5
4%
89 9
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
8
6%
86
x
x
0
0
0
01
0
7
5%
80A
x
x
01
0
4
3%
75 4"/,,
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
7
50
72 5°'a
45
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
15
11%
674%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
12%
56 5%
x
x
x
01
0
0
0
7
5%
44.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
12
9%
39.9%
x
0
01
0
0
5
4%
31.2%
40
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
10
7%
27.5%
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
11
8%
20.3%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
5%
12.3%
0
1
1%
7.2%
x
x
x
3
2%
6.5%
35
x
x
x
o
0
5
4%
4.3%
0
0%
0.7%
0
0%
0.7%
x
1
1%
07%
0
0%
0.0%
30
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
00%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
00%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
138
100
I
u
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11/3/2005 50th % 39 MPH
Location Begin 11:00AN End 12.-OOPN 85th % 43 MPH
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 36 45
Remarks RUSH TO GARVEY Recorded by TSI - K.W_ % in Pace 75%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percents e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%a
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
1000%
0
0
2
1%
100.0 .
45
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
7%0
98 c,
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
10
5%
914
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
6%
86
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
11%
802
"
x
x
x
x
x
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
12
6%
69.0
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
12%
62.6
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
9%
501-
x x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
14
7%
41 T-
x
X
x
x
O
O
O
0
O
O
0
0
12
6%
34.2
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
8
4%p
27 8`4,
35
x
x
0
0
0
5
3%
23 5/0
x
0
0
0
4
2%
20.9`!'
X
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
10
5%
187%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
7
4%
13,4°%,
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
9
5%
96°1
30
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
7
4%
4,8%
x
x
2
1%
1.1%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
00%
0
0%
00%
#
#
f
0
0%
0.0%
15
1
1
1
0
0%
0 0°/
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound
Tot
al Observed
187
100
11
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street
WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
Date 11/9/2005
Location
Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM
Direction
N-S
Weather CLEAR
Remarks
GARVEY TO HELLMAN
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 39 MPH
85th % 44 MPH
10MPH 35 44
% in Pace 70%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%,
0
0%
100.0%
5(
0
0%,
100.0%
4E
4(
3:
3(
x
1
1%
0.6%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%1
2E
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
2(
0
0%
0.0%1
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
01
0%
0.0%
15
000/1
t
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11/8/2005
Location Begin 11:00AN End 12:00PN
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR
Remarks HELLMAN TO VALLEY Recorded by TSI - K.W.
50th % 40 MPH
85th % 45 MPH
10MPH 35 44
% in Pace 69%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
1000%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
0%
100.0%
0
0%
99.5%
50
x
x
x
3
1%
99.5%
x
x
x
x
o
5
2%
98-1%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
9
4%
95.7%
x
x
x
3
1%
91.3%
x
x
x
x
0
0
6
3%
89.9%
45
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
9
4%
87.0%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
4%
82.6%
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
9
4%
78.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
10%
73.9%
x
x
x
x
x
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
12
6%
64.3%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
12%
58.5%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
10
0
0
0
16
8%
46.9%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
10%
39.1%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
8
4%
29.0%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
01
01
0
13
6%
25.1%
35
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
1
11
5%
18.8%
x
x
o
01
0
0
6
3%
13.5%
x
x
0
10
0
5
2%
10.6%
x
x
0
0
01
0
0
0
8
4%
8.2%
0
0
0
3
1%
4.3%
30
x
0
0
0
4
2%
2.9%
0
1
0%
1.0%
0
1
0%
0.5%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
00%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Tot
al Observed
207
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
Date 11/9/2005
50th %
Location
Begin 9:OOAM End 10:00AN
85th %
Direction N-S
Weather CLEAR
1OMPH
Remarks VALLEY TO MISSION
Recorded by TSI - K.W.
% in Pace
39 MPH
44 MPH
35 44
69%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percentage
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
x
1
0%
100.0%
0
0%
99.5%
50
x
1
0%
99.5%
x
x
x
3
1%
99.0%
x
x
x
0
4
2%
97.6%
0
0
0
3
1%
95.7%
x
x
o
0
0
5
2%
94.2%
45
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
11
50
91.8%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
6%
86.5%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
4%
80.7%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
01
0
0
0
0
13
6%
76.3%
x
x
o
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
12
6%
70.0%
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
10%
64.3%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
I
0
0
0
12
60
54.60
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
11%
48.8%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
13
6%
38.2%
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6%
31.9%
35
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
8%
25.6%
X
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
10
5%
17.4%
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
9
4%
12.6%
X
x
x
o
0
0
0
7
3%
8.2%
0
1
0%
4.8%
30
x
x
x
o
0
5
2%
4.3%
x
x
o
3
1%
1.9%
x
1
0%
0.5%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
00%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
L
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - EastlNorth bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed
207
100
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SPOT SPEED SURVEY
Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11/9/2005 50th % 40 MPH
Location Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM 85th % 45 MPH
Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 1OMPH 37 46
Remarks MISSION TO NORTH CITY LIMIT Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 75%
MPH
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of
Vehicles
Percent of
Total
Cumulative
Percenta e
65
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
60
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
55
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100-0%
0
0%
100.0%
0
0%
100.0%
50
x
1
1%
100.0%
x
1
1%
99.4%
x
o
2
1 %
98.7%
0
1
1%
. 97,4%
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
11
7%
96.8%
45
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
8
5%
89.6%
x
x
x
x
O
o
0
0
0
9
6%
84.4`%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
12
8%
78 6°/',
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
10%
70 8`'
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
01
01
9
6%
61 O'.
40
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
10%
55
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
12%
45
x
x
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
10
6%
33
x
x
x
x
x
a
0
01
1
8
5%
26 5
x
x
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
9
6%
21 4
35
x
0
0
0
0
5
3%
15 E"-
x
x
x
0
0
5
3%
12
x
x
x
o
4
3%
91'x':
x
x
0
10
0
0
6
4%
6.5°o
x
o
2
1 %
2.6%
30
x
o
2
1%
13%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
25
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
20
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
0
0%
0.0%
15
0
0%
0.0%
X - East/N
orth bound 0 - West /South Bound Total Observed
154
100
1
t
1 APPENDIX B
' Collision Rates
1
r
Engineering and Traffic Survey
r City of Rosemead
Ll
I
I
Ln
O
to
O
LO
O
U')
O
LO
O
O
O
to
O
LO
M
LO
M
U')
M
LO
M
U-)
O
O
O
LO
O
U)
O
to
O
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
CO
M
M
M
O
co
O
In
O
N
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
to
r
I~
O
r
N
r
O)
r
to
r
cn
N
O
Cl
O
v:
to
M
O
O
O
O
N
t0
c0
I~
to
u?
V:
O
v
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
c
0
0
0
ti
~
LO
N
r
O
O
O
00
M
0)
v
r
cn
O
~t
O
cn
r
O
O
to
O
1n
M
r
M
M
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
rn
O
N
r-
CD
CD
N
v
ti
co
c0
CF)
M
Iq
F--
N
~
co
O
V-
O
r
(Y)
O
CN
.
r
LO
trD
00
N
ce)
N
Co
LO
to
r-
N
co
N
r--
N
N CIO
M
IT
M
IT
r
V
r
U-)
It
O
O
O
CV)
Nr
C)
C14
CY)
N
LO
r
r
O
I
~
Q
•
w
g
m
m
Z
m
>
>
>
z
z
w
z
,
w
d
w
> w
m
z
W
J
W
z a
¢
°
C)
~
¢
}
°a
Q
J
aU'
W
U'
U
Z
U
Z
U)
>
w
w
a
Z Z
J z
W
Z
Z
J
w
>
x
i-
0)
L)
w
0
z
w
v¢i
o
U)
¢
Q
w
x
¢ Q
u~
w
w
0
W
°
W
°
F-
w
J
m
w
>
z
w
>
W
=
>
m
m
z
w
z
w
w
w
w
°
¢O
z
>
w
¢
w
w
Z
w
m
¢
¢
¢
w
~
w
x
m
r
w
¢
U
W
w
m
w
r
Q
0
V
¢
¢
° Z)
J O
Q
w
-1
2
U)
Q
x
¢
z
`n
to
~
w
-j
z
Jw
¢
Q
S
W
Q
2
U)
0
C7
C7
?
J
O
w
z
w
°
¢
U)
>
¢
U
z
(7
W
H
w
w
~
Z
Z)
z
w
U
~1
¢
z
QU
J
w
D
z
w
:3
W
_
W
_
W
~
Z
Z
z
j
wQ'
U)
Q
Q
z
¢
a
a
a
a
>
¢
¢
w
0
z
co
~
w
Q
Q
g
°
Z
w
w
w
w
o
<
0
` ¢
J
W
U
x
~
x
x
¢
J
U
LL
W
W
W
J
w
2
w
z
w
¢
C7
¢
C~
¢
C7
¢
C7
W
S
O
O
r
.
N
M
v
LO
(0
f-
co
0)
O
r
r
r
N
r
M
r
q
r
In
r
tD
r
a~
Q)
U
C
co
N
Q1
t;
W
70
co
a~
E
Q
0
U
1
1
1
' Ln
O
U')
O
LO
M
LO
O
(n
O
to
O
Ln
O
LO
O
Ln
O
u)
O
U')
O
Un
O
LO
M
O
r
un
O
LO
a)
M
M
M
M
V
M
st
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
~t
„ t O
Cl
O
to
(D
N
O)
(D
ti
O
O
I~
(D
u,)
1l-
(D
O)
r
N
(D
O
O
to
qqr
O)
O
h
M
00
LO
O
r-
O
M
co
U?
co
O
cn
V
(D
O
O
N
M
In
r
Cl
O
IT
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O
O
O
r
LO
N
M
(n
qcr
N
cn
N
0o
N
co
cn
N
cn
O
v
O
cn
(D
v
U')
cn
(N
v
0)
I;
(D
(D
in
1l-
O
LO
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
r
o
0
0
o
O
O
o
0
CY)
M
LO
o
O
LO
r-
co
V
Lf)
r-
(D
C)
O
0)
r
04
N
C14
M
CD
r
O
O
O
r
(D
r
1~
r
N
r
O
O
~
)
C
N
O
00
O
N
V
N
N
M
O
N
r
N
(D
f-
1n
N
V
O
r
r
u)
r
N
•
W
>
w
>
W
W
>
Z
w
Q
w
>
w
❑
>
F-
D
Z
O
•
m
❑
D
Z
O
O
m
°
❑
1
Z
>
w
Q
w
z
❑
J
❑
O
0
w
cr
w
Q
>
a
?w
>
°z
~w
W
}
w
>
a
p
~
~w
(n
w
ZZ
W
m
ZZ
w
w
z
>
J
J
ZZ
>
aw
a
0
m
i
O
Qw
~a
0
Of
J
>
~
Q
a
>
J
>
m
Qw
~a
w ❑
a
(D
W
m
~
o
c~
_
w
❑
w
❑
W
w
w
w
J
2
❑
m
z
O
of
m
w
❑
J
O
w
co
w
F-
z
W
p
w
w
w
z
w
w
w
z
>
>
a
?
zz
w
Q
Q
F-
ZS
ZZ
w
=
U)
w
>
jW
ZZ
U)
W
~
>
m
0
U
Fm-
Fes-
Z
}
>
_ J
w
un
m
(n
J W
(n
I
a
J w
3:
z
0~
6
Z
❑
(n
w
O
~a
2
~a
w
O
a
O
(A
(A
m
CD
W
W
W
W
❑
a
>
=
z
W
U
❑
>
❑
>
❑
>
w
>
w
>
w
>
w
>
W
J
❑
>
g
m
J
m
J
m
J
J
F-
F
J
J
❑
❑
°
W
w
p
m
a
O
❑
a
°
w
R
w
W
R
W
R
a
J
a
a
a
z
z
z
F-
>
z
z
W
w
m
a
co
_
=
m
=
o
o
o
a
a
o
'
U)
a
(n
w
a
(1)
w
a
(1)
w
a
Fn
(n
Fn
(n
V5
(n
0
U)
°
w
g
=
o
U)
O
0
°
C7
z
a
U
z
a
C7
z
a
g
z
(n
w
m
1l-
r
00
r
O
r
O
N
r
N
N
N
M
N
N
(n
N
CD
N
I~
N
M
N
O
N
O
M
r
M
N
M
Z
U
b
C
ca
O
m
C
Oi
W
07
N
0)
O
O
U
1
I
Ln
0~
to
17~
LO
O~
Ln
O
to
CO
Ul)
O
LO
O
LO
O
LO
O
to
O
N
co r
I,-
O
C)
to
co
w
N
m
U
co r
N
cP1o
~
m
ll~
°O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O
r
Lo
c
o
O
(D
a
co
C)
m
N
0
0
0
~
0
0
0
0
0
0
co
co
co
m
L
w
v
ti
co
0
w
Ln
rn
m
M
co
c
co
r
r
N
N
r
r
N
N
r
r
co
r
N
m
V'
co
I-
O
In
O
• •
U)
F-
>
❑
❑
W
Z
1-
J
J
m
Z
W
a
W
Lij
Z
W
a
W
Q
J
❑
m
J
z
CIO
J
LU
Q
2
>
J
!A
N
F-
>
Z
w
0
x
C~
2
>
Z
1-
W
>
>
0]
:D
Z
W
U)
❑
Q
m
J
W
W
F
W
>
❑
m
>
m
U)
m
w
p
L
co co
F-
Q
w
z
w
z0
W
Z
•
J
Z
W
O
Z
2
U)
>
M Q
J
W
J
Q
U)
(A
O
>
U
w
U)
w
C7
2
>
m
m
>
>
>
>
>
>
U
U
>0
0>
J
J
m
W
m
}
W
Z
Z
CL
w
a
w
-j
>
-j
>
ZZ
~Q
ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
Z
Z
M
M
c~
co
Cr-
V)
Go
ce)
M
~
I
Z
3
U
a
c
co
m
m
c
W
a
co
m
E
m
0
0
U
1
1
1
APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment
1
Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rosemead
1
1
SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED
The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for this survey include two
Model K1 5-K Hand-Held Traffic Radar manufactured by MPH Industries, Inc., of Chanute,
Kansas. The calibration of the unit was checked before each series of measurements
were taken. Tests of the unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications. The Model K1 5-K Hand-Held Traffic Radar's were last calibrated on July
29, 2005 and July 31, 2005 by R.H.F, Inc.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
t City of Rosemead