The URL can be used to link to this page

CC - Item 3B - Adoption of New User Fee Schedule• • ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL r***~f STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUN IL FROM: ANDREW C. LAZZARETTO, CITY MANAGE DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 2006 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF A NEW USER FEE SCHEDULE SUMMARY On June 13, 2006, the City Council authorized staff to contract with MuniFinancial for the purpose of examining and updating the City's existing user fee schedule. The intent of the exercise was to examine the true cost of providing certain municipal services and has resulted in the creation of an updated user fee schedule for the City Clerk's Office, the Community Development Department, the Engineering Department, and the Finance Department. MuniFinancial has since completed their study and have provided an updated user fee schedule for City Council consideration. The new schedule was created only after gaining an understanding of the fully burdened cost for city personnel involved in providing certain services. By taking the total salary and benefit costs for employees in each department and then determining the amount of time it typically takes to provide a certain service, MuniFinancial was able to determine the appropriate cost for certain user services. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2006-36 (Attachment A) establishing a new user fee schedule. ANALYSIS User Fee Background In Rosemead On December 15, 1992, the Rosemead City Council enacted user fees for planning, engineering, park & recreation, and development permitting services. Since that time, the City had not conducted a comprehensive user fee study to determine if the current fee structure was in alignment with the true cost of providing such services. After reviewing the situation, the City Council approved a contract with MuniFinancial to conduct a City-wide user fee study. The report was recently completed and provides an in- depth analysis of the City's current fee schedule, the true cost of providing certain user services, and the compilation of a new user fee schedule. APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: v ~ 0 0 City Council Meeting September 26, 2006 Page 2 of 2 The attached study (Attachment B) contains detailed information regarding, including justification for the new user fee rates. Scope of Work MuniFinancial reviewed and analyzed fees for the following departments: Community Development City Clerk Finance ■ Engineering ■ Parks and Recreation This work resulted in the development of a proposed new user fee schedule for Community Development, the City Clerk's Office, Finance, and Engineering. Due to the nature of the operations in Parks & Recreation, setting fee recovery levels at 100% would most likely lead to a reduction in the number of participants. Therefore, MuniFinancial conducted an analysis to identify the current cost recovery level for the entire department as an informational item for the City Council's consideration. It appears that the department is recovering around 5.8% of the cost attributable to services being provided in the department. User Fee Comparison When the City Council authorized the user fee study, it was also requested that information be produced to compare the proposed fees for the City and fees charged by surrounding jurisdictions. MuniFinancial prepared such an analysis and collected the user fee schedule from Pasadena, Downey, Montebello, Monterey Park, and South Pasadena for comparative purposes. That information was extracted from the full report and has been included as a separate attachment (Attachment C) for the City Council to review. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. LEGAL REVIEW This staff report and Attorney. Submitted by: the attached resolution have been reviewed and approved by the City Oliver Chi Deputy City Manager Attachment A: Resolution 2006-36 Attachment 6: MuniFinancial User Fee Study Attachment C: User Fee Comparison 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-36 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ESTABLISHING A NEW USER FEE SCHEDULE FOR SERVICES RENDERED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AND THE PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, the City Council engaged the services of MuniFinancial to conduct a comprehensive user fee study and update on June 13, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City is granted the authority under Section 66000 et. seq. of the California Government Code to impose user fees for services rendered that primarily benefit an individual; and WHEREAS, the User Fee Study conducted by MuniFinancial recommends the implementation of a user fee schedule that will only allow the City to recover the amount it costs to provide specified services; and WHEREAS, the City Council published a notice of hearing on the potential user fee increases, made the study available to the public, and held a public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Government Code 66016 and 66018. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: • SECTION 1. The Council finds and determines that the user fees set forth on the attached user fee schedule (Appendix A) do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged. SECTION 2. The attached user fee schedule (Appendixx A) for services rendered in the City Clerk's Office, the Community Development Department, the Engineering Department, and the Finance Department is adopted as the City's official user fee schedule. SECTION 3. Each year in conjunction with the adoption of a new City budget, the City Council shall have the authority to increase or decrease all user fees by resolution at a rate equal to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County region. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rosemead on this 14th day of November, 2006. Mayor, City of Rosemead ATTEST: • City Clerk, City of Rosemead APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS • Full Cost Rao, Fee subsidy (full coal Fully Burdened Rate urrent Fee recovery fee lose (per Burdened ed Rate Third Party/ Required Fee (kroludes 3rd party/ C required fees) Current fee) S-i-1AppI-fl n _ -`---Fee- goi:i Frr F]oies ---T^c Farr C4 Clerk The City Clerks office Is responsible for conducting all elections, maintaining official city flies and performing necessary clerical work In ccaVanctionrwith the City Council. The City Clerk collects data for Council agendas, takes and "nscribes Council minutes, conducts election procedures, updates the municipal code, and is responsible to and serves under the direction of Via City Council. - - F d,n9 o_l:irCVlat- 01 Jr-. IniLatrve - - - 3 34 3 - - - 54 - $ hew Fee rva Rosemead Muniu al Code Book - Actual Cost New Fee Na Subpoena for Records (Evidence Code Section 1583) S6 56 New Fee NO Cdv Records Copies Slanderd or Lewd) _ _ _ New Fee Na Color Copies (Standard) 56 56 New Fee Na Color Copies fLe"D 56 56 Information Re b Documents not in existence requilring research 84 84 New Fee Ne Audio Tape Copy 280 _ Plus Actual Cost of Materiels 280 New Fee We Audio Tape Copy If tape provided by mqueslor 280 280 New Fee We CD. Floppy Disk, or Flash Drive Copy 56 Plus Actual Cost of Material* 5e New Fee We CD Co N or Disk Is provided the remmirlof 56 fib New Fee Na OVD Copy _ Plus Actual Cost of New Fee Ns DVD Cop if DVD Is provided by the requeelor 98 se Now Fee We G Council Agenda mailed 84 84 New Fee We City Council Minules mailed 188 lea New Fe Ns s Certified Ca tes of On inal Documents 100 100 New Fee We Nola Fee 1M 144 New Fee We New Fee No Reproduction of Public Record Black and While copies WS x 11 - Actual Cost New Fee No 8.5 x 11 Color copies, r ■ 14 14 New Fee Na 11.5 x 14 Color copies, r 14 U New Fee Na 11 x 17 Color copies, per s 14 14 New Fee We Custom Size copies • Actual Cost New Fee rue For records whom skctroNC format requested is the same as that used . Actual Cost - New Fee Na For recortls where eNc4oNC krrrtat requested If for a retard which is produced only at otherwise repulady schedule kderwb, or a'data compaatlan. extraction. or progmmmkq' is required to produce the . Actual Cost - - New Fee a Bound records 190 198 New Fee Na Oiastal photographs On ~ paper 128 128 New Fee Na Photographs. slides. transparencies. blueprkds, maps and other pubic - Actual Cost - New Fee Na Records Stored O6sbe. Adddi.W Retrieval. Re-Fee and Transportolim Fee 185 185 New Fee Na Certification For the ko peas, 29 29 New Fee Na 1 Per 10 pope 58 55 New Fee Na Plans b Specs Distribution 260 260 New Fee Na 40 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALY1316 • • Fully Burdened Raft (per occuraneehaso) Third Party/ Required Fee ServiteiApplication - Full Cost Recovery Fee autmidy (full cost (includes 3rd partyl Current Fee recovery fee less required fees) current lee) - r N~i~z i Fee x:'oics Community Development Planning Division The Planning Division Is rosponsible for the supervfslon of land use in the City, development, updating, maintenance assistance to the Rasemead Communlty Development Co Copies i - Fre ~ Fee rdot~a i Foe - and Implementation of the City's General Plan, and provides technical mmisslon. Land Use Database . Actual Cost - Actual Cost 35 Per Copy n1a General Plan (including background report) 107 107 25 Per Copy 82 General Plan Ma 85 65 5 Per Co 50 Reconstrudiuon Section Of Coda 107 107 107 Zonis At A Glance Chart 32 32 Per Co 32 Zoning Ma 107 107 5 102 Zoning Requirements 32 32 - Per copy 32 Zuni Ordinance 107 107 35 72 Public Hearin items Conditional Use Pemits CUP 2,033 2,033 675 Per Transaction m 5a D" n Review DR Con.nercia9Resktendal 3,045 3,045 390 Per Transaction 2,655 General Plan Amendmertl GPA 2,657 2,657 950 Par Transaction 1,707 Mtadd al Code Amendment 2,657 2,657 925 Per Transaction 1,732 Planned Development Review (PD) 1,437 1,437 635 Per Tninsacton 802 Relief From Ordinance RFO - MoritorWms 948 948 300 Per Transaction 648 Relocation Impact Re on RIR - Mobile Horne Parks 3,234 3 234 1,500 Par TrsnucWn 1,734 Tenfalve Parcel I Trot Maps PM I TTM' 2,419 2 419 1,355 Per Transaction 1.034 Tentative Parcel I Trad Maps Per Lot 2,419 2,419 100 Per Transaction 2,319 Appeals Flip Fee 1,144 1,144 300 Per Transaction 844 Public Haan Fee 720 720 38 Par Transacion 683 Other Mama Occupwv-y Perms 1.385 1,385 225 Par Transaction 1.160 Site Plan Review 3 651 3,651 225 Par Transaction 3,426 Environmental Impact Assessment (WU Study) 8,146 B .m 300 Per Transaction 7,846 EIR - Plus Outside Consultant 9.683 8,683 2,9W Per Transaction 5,783 M Fxlentions 8,683 5,693 400 Per Transaction 6,253 Minor Lol Line Adusiment 13,910 13,910 290 Per Transaction 13,620 Geolo -I Re ors 1,228 1,228 325 Per Tmnswt*n 903 Oak Tree Perms 1.228 1,228 800 Par Transaction 428 Zonis Cam laince Leger • f 2065 2,065 2.065 r 4a1v wa. General Services , Stormwaler pernul inspeWaMre.Napection, ummerciaplnduskfal, in addib9n to Stale [a** (includes Gas Stallons and Auto Dealml 2,037 2,037 New Fee We Stommvatar pemit Inspectlonfre4nspection. restaurant. in addition to Stale fees 2,037 - - 2,037 - New Fee We Appeal of Public Nuisance Delenrdnabon to City Manager, payable in sdv 2,863 2,W3 - N" Fee We Appeal of Public Nuisance Determination to City Counc . payable in advance. hag of mhich Is refumdable if mmal Is uctield 3,962 3,962 - New Fee We New Filing ■nd Application Misca(laneous Parmft : Laundry/Dry Clean: In-C 501 501 - New Fee We Adult Bus: Movie Book M113SJIM 501 501 - New Fee n/a Massage Parlor O eratin Pemiit 501 501 - New Fee Na Massa a Technician Permll 501 501 - New Fee Na Adult Bus Live Entertainment 501 501 New Fee Na Setf-Service Storage Facility _ 501 501 - New Fee n/a APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS • 0 eMm/A llcatiorn Fully Burdened Rate (per occurence/CaN) Third Party/ Rsqulred Fee Full Cost Recovery Fee (includes 3rd piulyl required fees( Current Fee Subsidy (full cost recovery foe lass current fee) N Notes N N FN Notes FN Senior CA%en Housing 501 501 - New Fee Na Vehicle TwWri ration 501 501 - New Fee Na Dance & Entarakmment Perrill (Retall/M34 501 501 - New Fee Na Fortune Telling 501 501 - New Fee Na Mobile Home Parks 501 501 - New Fee Na Tatoo Pa r SO Na Other Buskmas N Bingo license appica im too. per PC326.5 CA Panel Code Section 326.5(12) 1 332 inds; IN N 860 1,332 - New Fee Na Business and Animal Penrr/er Tow Car Business Assistant Periit for Those Hired After Initial Apphestion 464 464 - New Fee Ns Tow r Business Inspection F Incident to application permit 249 249 - New Fee Na Tow Car Business Pemdt Fee for Owner end ell assistants at t me of applicAtion 249 249 - New Fee We Block Parry Permit (Includes Permit for Eroadxnenl Into Public Roo+ of-wgy) 249 249 - New Fee Na Pars Permit 1,373 1,373 - New Fee We Temporary Use Permit 2,295 2 295 - New Fee We Yard Sale ardt 231 231 - New Fee Ne Fireworks Pemnb 256 256 - New Fee Na Arlnsl Permit Koevinci Wild or Vicious Animal I 1 1 - New Fee Na Arterial Permit than Nose 1 1222 1 - New Fee We Production Fees Motion Picture, Tele dston, Radio and Photographic Production Peril, rd Production om snies 2,431 2.431 New Fee Na Student Production 602 602 - New Fee Na Engineerfng The Clfy of Rosemead has a contract with Wilidan to provide engineering smites. Those services Include administrative duties and development review, A rerainer of $800 Is collected monthly for these services and Wllldan bills the publk on a time and materials basis. Trail Map Tenlalive 1 ract Ma 270 Full Cost 270 270 Record Ma Analysis 2,850 Full Cos[ 2 B50 2. 1% Additional Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost 50 50 Monument Review 370 Full Cost 370 370 Defamed Momenerd Review 300 Full Cost 300 300 M Verification 255 Full Cost 255 255 Ma Clearance Review 300 Full Cost 300 300 Tract M Che6 Submittal 450 Full Cost 450 450 Parcel Map TenutNe Parcel Ma 270 Full Cost 270 270 Record M• Analysis 2,000 Full Cost 2,000 2,000 Additonal Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost so 50 Dedications 750 Full Cost 750 750 Monument Review 370 Rd Cost 370 370 Ma Venfcation 225 Full Cost 225 225 Ma Clearance Review 300 Full Cost 300 300 Parcel Ma Check Submittal 450 Full Cost 450 450 Certificate of Compliance (Lot Line Adjustment) 42 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS 0 ervice/Ap Ilation ed Rata Fully (per Burdened Rate Third Partyl Required Fee Full Cost Recovery Fee (includes 3rd partyl squired teem) Current Fee Subsidy (full cost recovery tee lose currant fee) ee Notes w o s w Fee Note Fee Record Document Analysis OW Full Cost 600 500 Additional Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost 50 50 Varitcabon Of Compliance 225 Full Con 225 225 Review of Agreements 225 Full Con 225 225 Plan Checking Initial Pion Check $600 plus 4.5% of the fist 5511.000. plus 3% of the next 5100,ODD, Plum 1.5% theraafter of the estMnaled - construction, cost - 5500 plus 4.5% of the Ibst 550.000. plus 3% of the - nest 5100.000. plus 1.5% thereafter of the tslYnated construction cost lan Chock Revision 5600 plus 4.5% of the W $50.000, plus 3% of the next $100,000, plus 1.5% thereafter of the estimated - construction cost. $500 plus 4.5% of the W 550,000, plus 3% of the next 5700.000, plus 1.5% thereafter of the estrrrled anstnrcton coal construction Permits Issuance Fee 50 50 50 Initial Observation f500, plus 6% of the trai $700.000. plus 5% of the next $100,000, plus 4% thereafter of the estimated - construction cost - $500, plus 8% of the tint $100,000, plus 5% of the - next 3100.000, plus 4% thereafter of the estimated construction cost. - Modifications Observation - Actual Cost - Actual Cost Drive 250 Per Driveway 250 250 Per Drfve~my Close Existln DAvewa Opening 250 Per DrWawa 250 250 Per Individual Sidewalk I Sidewak Fig4f 250 Per Location 250 250 Per Localion Individual Curb / Gutter 200 Per Location 2D0 200 Per Location Individual Alley Improvement Per Sq. Fool I 3 Location 3 3 Per Sq. Fool ! Location Street Trees 50 First Tree 50 50 Pest Tree Additional Streit Trees 25 Every Tree Thereafter - 25 25 Every Tree Thereafter Curb Drain 150 Per Drain 150 150 Per Drain Parkway Drain 300 Per Drain 300 300 Per Drain Relocate Exis' Drainage Structure 1,000 Per Stuck" 1,000 I,DOO Per Structure Excavation Permits Service Out $17.501 cut and $2 for each sq. R of - exava0on _ _ $17.50 I had and 52 for vati each sq. It. of excavation vatlon Main Lim S2 per sq. It. for each - s q. t. of excavation $2 per sq. fl. for each sq. of excavation Sewer Gds Resident 250 Connection To Main 250 250 Connection To Main Sewer Cuts (Commercial) 350 Connection To Main 350 350 Connection To Main Encroaahnwnt Permha Stockpile Material I Waste In Street R' 2W Par Stockpile 2001 200 Per Stockpile Placing Container In Street Right-Of-Way Par Corhlairhar 250 RefundabN _ 250 250 Par Container Refundable 43 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS • is ervice/Application Rant Fully (par eBurd Burdened ed Rae Third Party/ Required Fee Full Cost Recovery Fee (Includes 3rd party! required fees( Current Fee Subsidy (full coat recovery fee less currant fee( w o ee Notes Fee Fee Notes Fee Plan Tempormy Structure / E u' 1 In Stoat RighkX-Way 200 Per Structure 266 200 Per Structure Pedeslnan Protection Reurad Budding Code 200 Par Location 200 200 Per Location Street Closures 200 Per Location 200 200 Per Location Commerrul Ftknin - Weekday 400 Per Day 400 400 Per D Commerael Filming - Weekends, Nights. & Holidays 800 Per Day ON BW Per Day Other Enaoarhments P Issuance Fee, Plus 50 Actual Coats - 50 50 Issuance Fee, Plus Actual Cos" ropelled NW Public Im mvemant Plan Review Fee We Major I mvernem Plan Review base fee 1,663 1.563 - New Foe We plus each lot 63 63 - New Fee Na Minor Improvement Plan Review ass lee 1,125 1,125 - New Fee Ns plus each lot 63 83 - New Fee Na Final Subdivision Ma Review Fee Maw Mom Final Ma Review lase lee 1,625 1,625 - New Fee Ns plus each lot 75 75 - Now Fee Na Major Subdivision Map Acceptance of Improvements and Dsdirallom 1,500 - 1800 - New Fee Na Motor ' Mw Aniendmord of Subdivision Aarearment 875 075 Now Fee We Minor We Minor Parcel Ma Review • f 1,250 1,250 - New Fee N• plus each lot 75 75 - New Fee N• Minor Subdivision Map Acceptance of ImpmvemeMs and Dedications 583 , 583 - New Fee Na Minor Subdivision of Subdivision A 300 300 New Fee N• New lot fee - Actual Cost - Actual Cost New Fee Na Base M Revision Fee 25 25 - Now Fee No Grease Trap Plan Review Fee 75 75 - New Fee Na Document Retrieval Fee so 50 - New Foe Na St Si ns each intersection installed C' 375 375 - New Fee Na Street Lights, each intersection. installed by City 125 125 New Fee Na Speed Buffs each Installed C' 313 313 - New Fee Na Parade Penny 25 23 - New Fee rVa Parc=f m" Thep Finance Dts' NSF checks 300 1 - 300 1 New Fee Per Chill Code 1719, maximum allowable charge for first NSF check Is $25 and for second and each subsequent NSF check is $35 rv. e St payment/check re•issuance 41 41 New Foe Na Yard Sale Permit 17 17 New Fee Na Bud eVCAFR/CIP Documents • Actual Cost - Actual Cost Actin Cost New Fee Na Busmess License Lisli on CD 8 8 Now Fee Na Business License Processing Fees Business Processing Fee/Permit Fee 184 184 New Fee Na Annual Renewal Processing Fee 97 97 New Fee Na Du IIC IC Cc 1111Ca10 54 54 Now Fee Na Change of Locution _ 44 M New Fee Ne APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS Fully Burdened Rate Fun Cost Recovery Fee Subsidy (full cost (per oacummela"I Third Fartyl Required Fee (Includes 3rd party/ Current Fee recovery fee less required fees) current fee) Servi WA lication Fee Notes N Notes Fee Fes Notes Fee Parks 6 Recreation Via Parks and RecreabOn Department administurs and coordinates all park, recreation, and related functions In the City, Specifically, the deparlmenf coordinates all recreation prams„classes, ' aduiVyouthsporis leagues, special events, civic and cultural prvgrems, and volunteerservfces.' ' "Note:' See Report for the Macro Cost vs- Revenue Analysts of the Parks d Recreation i3epartmer t 0 17~ 45 CITY OF ROSEMEAD USER FEE STUDY NOVEMBER 99 2006 FINAL REPORT MuniFinancial Corporate Office: 27368 Via Industria Suite 110 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (951) 587-3500 Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) Fax: (951) 587-3510 Office Locations: Anaheim, CA Lancaster, CA Oakland, CA Phoenix, AZ Sacramento, CA Seattle, WA www.muni.com 0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Purpose of User Fee INTRODUCTION Policy Considerations Methodology Data Collection Fees Comparison 4 5 6 6 CHAPTER 1. CITY CLERK 8 Description of Services 8 Analysis 8 City Clerk - FB Hourly Rates Summary 9 Table 1.1: City Clerk - FB Hourly Rates Summary 10 Time and Materials (T&M) Survey 11 Full Cost Recovery Fee Summary 11 Table 1.2: City Clerk - Fee Schedule 12 Table 1.2: City Clerk - Fee Schedule Summary 13 Summary 14 CHAPTER 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/ PLANNING 15 Description of Services 15 Analysis 15 Community Development/Planning - FB Hourly Rates Summary 16 Table 2.1: Community Development/Planning - FB Hourly Rates Summary 17 Time and Materials (T&M) Survey 18 Full Cost Recovery Fee Summary 18 Table 2.2: Community Development/Planning - Fee Schedule 19 Table 2.2: Community Development/Planning - Fee Schedule 20 Table 2.2: Community Development/ Planning - Fee Schedule Summary 21 Summary 22 CHAPTER 3. ENGINEERING 23 Description of Services 23 Analysis 23 Engineering - FB Hourly Rates Summary 24 Table 3.1: Engineering - FB Hourly Rates Summary 25 Time and Materials (T&M) Survey 26 Full Cost Recovery Fee Summary 26 Table 3.2: Engineering - Fee Schedule 27 Table 32: Engineering - Fee Schedule 28 Table 32: Engineering - Fee Schedule Summary 29 Summary 30 CHAPTER 4. FINANCE 31 Description of Services Analysis Finance - FB Hourly Rates Summary Table 4.1: Finance - FB Hourly Rates Summary Time and Materials (T&M) Survey Full Cost Recovery Fee Summary Table 4.2: Finance - Fee ScheduleSummary Summary • 31 31 32 33 34 34 35 36 CHAPTER 5. PARKS & RECREATION 37 Description of Services Analysis 37 37 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS 39 APPENDIX B: FULL-COST COST ALLOCATION PLAN 46 APPENDIX C: FEE COMPARISON 61 APPENDIX D: FEE COMPARISON CONT 69 11 • • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As local governments deal with increased fiscal limitations in California, service fees, or user fees have become an important source of revenue. This revenue source for the City of Rosemead is detailed in this report. The City of Rosemead is located in the San Gabriel Valley. The City was incorporated in 1959 and spans 5.5 square miles. Today, the city boasts that its goals include the improvement of quality of life offered in Rosemead in a business friendly atmosphere conducive to economic growth and prosperity. The City offers a desirable and affordable community in which to live and a dynamic and expanding business sector that is an economic growth engine for West Coast commerce. Therefore, it is no surprise that the City of Rosemead is home to over 57,000 residents. PURPOSE OF USER FEE A user fee is a payment made by an individual for a service provided by a jurisdiction that primarily benefits that individual, or user. The primary objective of this User Fee Study completed for the City of Rosemead, California, is to determine the full cost to the City for providing administrative services. The City requested that this report determine the full cost recovery fees that may be charged to users for each service to: 1) Recover up to 100% of the actual cost of providing the service 2) Identify and recommend additions or deletions to the City's existing service fee schedule The City can impose fees under the authority granted by California Government Code 5§66000 et. seq. ("Code'} and is required by the Code to hold at least one public hearing as part of a regularly scheduled City Council meeting to allow for public comment on its proposed fees. The Code requires that the Council adopt approved fees by either ordinance or resolution. Costs included in this analysis are based on the fully burdened hourly rates ("FB Hourly Rates") for city personnel involved in providing a service. FB Hourly Rates not only include direct annual salaries and benefits but also indirect departmental overhead costs, interdepartmental support costs, and central services overhead costs. The services and fees for each department/division are addressed individually in chapters 1 through 5 of this report. The tables included in each chapter include a list of the services provided by the department/ division, the FB Hourly Rates of all positions involved in providing a service, and the results of the time and materials surveys conducted for each department/division. A Full Cost Recovery Fee Summary Table shows the current fee being charged for each service by the City, the total cost to the City in time and materials to provide the service, any third party/required/penalty fees for each service, and the full cost recovery fee for each service, which represents an amount sufficient to recover 100% of the City's costs of providing a service. MuniFinancial 0 0 INTRODUCTION According to California Government Code §§66000 et. seq., public agencies can impose fees for government services when: 1) the individual's decision to use the service is voluntary; and 2) the fees charged to an individual user are reasonably related to the level of service rendered to the cost of providing that service. Fees in California are required to conform to the statutory requirements of the California Constitution, the California Government Code, and the California Code of Regulations. According to the California Government Code, fees may not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service for which they are collected unless the excess fee is approved by a two- thirds (2/3) vote of the electorate. The City believes that its General Fund may be subsidizing many services that benefit users, and that current fees may not account for the support costs associated with the service delivery. To correct such possible deficiencies, the City has requested an update of its fee schedule. As a part of the update, this report reviews current fees for services, the total cost associated with delivering a service, and identifies the full cost recovery fee. However, this report does not analyze fees where the total cost cannot be determined through a time and materials survey. Such fees include rental charges for rooms and facilities, penalty fees and late charges. We believe that there is no requirement to base rental charges or penalty fees on actual costs, since the City is providing no "service" and no direct or indirect costs are being borne by the City that go over and above normal maintenance to City property. Typically, a city will rent or lease property for special uses and will charge what is deemed a competitive market rate for such rent. The City of Rosemead can consider this approach for fees that are considered rental charges or penalty fees. We would expect that reasonableness and market comparables would be a good basis for determining the appropriate level of these types of fees. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Economists and government practitioners in California advocate the use of fees to finance certain public services that primarily benefit users. Fees are imposed because they recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes. Increasingly, jurisdictions not only want to collect the full cost of staff labor associated with processing and administering services that benefit users, but also wish to recover support costs- Support costs are those costs relating to a jurisdiction's central services departments that are properly allocable to the effective functioning of the jurisdiction's operating departments. Appropriate support costs are generally derived from a jurisdiction's cost allocation plan. For the purpose of this study, MuniFinancial prepared a Fully-Cost Cost Allocation Plan using the City's operating budget for FY 2006/07 (Appendix B). As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it be adopted with the flexibility to remain current. A fee schedule that is flexible and easy to use will assist the City MuniFinancial 0 0 in its effort to ensure that fees are based on current and reasonable costs for providing services. As a result, it is recommended that the City include an annual inflation factor in the ordinance adopting the fee schedule that allows the City Council, either by ordinance or resolution, to annually increase or decrease the fees based upon published information such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation as released by the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Annually, the City should consider determining the percentage change in the selected adjustment factor and applying the resulting increase or decrease to the fee schedule by adopting the change. Fees set by federal or state law are exempt from such adjustment. METHODOLOGY The method of analysis for calculating fees that has been used in this report is the: Case Study Method- This approach estimates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff regarding the time typically spent on tasks; a review of available records; and • Time and Materials (1 &M) Analysis. The T&M analysis involves charging a fee based on actual costs, including staff time (at FB Hourly Rates), material costs, and outside contractor costs, if applicable. Use of this T&M analysis is suitable when city staff time requirements vary dramatically for a service, or for special projects where the time and cost requirements are not easy to identify at the project's outset. Further, the use of the T&M method is effective in instances when a staff member from one department assists on an application, service or permit for another department on an as-needed basis. To use the T&M method for any of the services provided, the City may want to consider adopting the following policy or a similar one approved by the City Attorney: Concurrent with the submittal of an application, the project applicant shall pay deposit amounts (when specified) and enter into an agreement to fully reimburse the City for processing costs. The City shall not be required to perform any work on the application prior to receipt of the deposit and execution of the agreement. The agreement shall also include a provision for amendments to the agreement and scope of work to cover work that was unforeseen or substantially exceeded time and materials estimates. • Macro Cost vs. Revenue Method This "top-down" approach evaluates the appropriateness of current fees by comparing the total cost of a service category (e.g. Youth Sports & Programs) against total revenues received. Costs are estimated by apportioning 100% of each staff member among the various service categories. This type of analysis tells decision makers whether a category of fees is creating a revenue surplus, deficit, or breaking even. This method was employed for the Parks and Recreation analyses. Under these methods, indirect costs are added to the direct cost of service to calculate the fee. Indirect cost figures are obtained from the City's January 2006 Cost Allocation Plan. MuniFinancial 0 0 DATA COLLECTION This report identifies three (3) cost layers that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service. The cost layers are defined as: direct labor including salary and benefits, departmental overhead, and the City's central services overhead. These layers are defined as follows: Direct Labor. Staff hours spent directly on fee-related services as shown on the Time and Materials survey tables included in each chapter. • Departmental Overhears: Hours spent on staff supervision by the Department director and administrative activities including clerical support, supplies and materials shown on the Time and Materials survey tables included as departmental overhead in each chapter. • Cenlral Services Overheard These costs, detailed in the City's Fully-Cost Cost Allocation Plan prepared by MuniFinancial, represent services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary function is to support other City departments. Finally, data collection included a thorough review of relevant City documentation, such as the City's General Fund budget, current City fee schedules, and correspondence related to fee services. FEES COMPARISON The final data tool provided to the City in this report is a fee comparison matrix for each department. Each matrix includes the City's current fees, the City's full cost recovery fees, and the current fees of other jurisdictions that were deemed comparable to the City of Huntington Park. The comparable jurisdictions were determined and chosen based on locality, demographics, and staff recommendations. The purpose of the comparison matrix is to show how the City's full cost recovery fees compare to fees charged by the chosen jurisdictions for similar services. Although comparison matrix is a useful tool for the City to have an overview of fees charged by other jurisdictions, it is not recommended that the City sets its fees based on the fees charged by other jurisdictions for the following reasons: The notable challenge is the lack of background information was provided despite research efforts and many inquiries. The current fees charged by the chosen jurisdictions are not always comparable to the City's full cost recovery fees. It is formidable to have an apple-to-apple fee comparison. Services included in each fee vary from city to city. For example, the plan check fee of a chosen jurisdiction may include permit issuance fee while the plan check fee of Huntington Park City does not include permit issuance fee. MuniFinancial • • It is not always determinable when was the last time the chosen jurisdiction updated its fees schedule. This is crucial since many cities continue charging fees that were established years ago. Thus, these fees do not reflect the inflation over the years like the full cost recovery fees were calculated in this study, and consequently the full cost recovery fees are higher than fees of the chosen jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the comparison matrix is a useful tool to have an overview of what other cities charge for similar services. Again, it is important for policy makers to understand that it is not recommended to set fees based the fees charged by neighboring jurisdictions. The best method for setting fees is to determine the actual costs of services based on time and materials, which we have done in this report, and establish fees up to 100% recovery level and based on policy and political consideration. MuniFinancial 7 • • CHAPTER 1 . CITY CLERK DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The City Clerk's office is responsible for conducting all elections, maintaining official city files and performing necessary clerical work in conjunction with the City Council. The City Clerk collects data for Council agendas, takes and transcribes Council minutes, conducts election procedures, updates the municipal code, and is responsible to and serves under the direction of the City Council. ANALYSIS The City does not have an adopted fee schedule for services performed by the City Clerk's office. Therefore, any fees currently collected are billed as the "actual cost" of materials with no administrative overhead. As such, the current fee schedule is not 100% cost recoverable. An analysis of fees adopted by other jurisdictions is used as a benchmark to set the City of Rosemead's fee schedule for the following services performed by the City Clerk's department: • Information Request 0 Reproduction of Public Record The purpose of this analysis is twofold: 1) to describe the components involved in determining the total cost based on time and materials, and 2) to show the maximum allowable fee the City can charge based on a 100% recovery level. While it is our intent to show a full cost recovery fee based on full costs, the City administration will ultimately decide which fees to adopt based on policy and political considerations. MuniFinancial 8 CITY CLERK -,FE HOURLY RATES SUMMARY Table 1.1 below shows the FB Hourly Rates Summary for the City Clerk's Department positions involved in providing the public with information request and reproduction of public document services. As described in the Data Collection section, this table illustrates the following: • Direct Labor: The total employee salary and benefits paid by the department as illustrated in column E of Table 1.1. Personnel costs of $270,722 were determined from the City's 2006/07 Budget. Departmental Overhead: Includes the non-billable annual salary of $18,245 for the position of City Clerk. This position is considered "non-billable" because a percentage of its salary is not directly tied to the Time and Materials Survey. However, since this salary is budgeted in this department, it is included in the departmental overhead costs. Additionally, the 2006/07 operating budget for this division of $593,038 is included as departmental overhead. Central Services Overhead: A Full-Cost Allocation Plan completed by MuniFinancial for the City of Rosemead in 2006 was used to determine the central services allocation of $0 (Appendix B). Appendix C, a fee comparison of neighboring jurisdictions shows that many of the fees the City of Rosemead is proposing are similar to those charged by other jurisdictions. • Fully Burdened Hourly Rate: By using the methodology listed above, the Fully Burdened Hourly Rate is listed under column "N" of Table 1.1. Munihnancial TABLE 1. II CITY CLERK -F@ HOURLY RATE'S SUMMARY 18,245 597.038 • 242.+1% w Annual Salary a Number of Hourly Salary % of Time Employe. Salary d x Nonbaable Non-0h8able %Annual Salary Billable Amu Total Dept Central Fully Burdens Productive Hour 10 Fully Burdened Ben.fit Rates by Employees' 6 Benefit Allocated W Benefit paid by the Annual Salary 8 Annual Salary 8 Benee4 to Salary 8 Overhead 5-th; Direct Labor' Hourly Labor Raga " Personnel CL.-' Rates' Department Departhunt' aenefih to aBenaeh° Department So-so, I Allocation' Overhead Department Overhead Penonnal Coats AsooeYons 242.11% 0.00% A B C D E F G H 1 J . K . L M N Job Claaaakaderna' S.Lary-6 A/1:00 A•o E 100x- E-0 Di eot 0 Overhead % 1ndted 0 Overhead % NN( 1,800'0 1 (LM) Cdy Clerk s 1:2,449 1.00 s 101 W s 1:2,419 lox s 18,245 Box s 164,204 S 397.562 s 1 1 561.780 1620 s 347 Ncs Ito :the Cnv CW1 E9071 100 49 100".i: a8.27.. 0% 100°n. BE.27a 13.721 : 301,994 1800 168 From City's 2006X1 Budget From City's 2006X7 Budget Employee salary 8 benefits paid by the Department (column E Total) less Non4flable Annual Salary 8 Benefits (column G Total) 2 Average salaries and benefits provided by the City's 2006107 Budget for the respective job classification and multiplied by the number of employees (Column 8) r1y ry per an employee to the Department, not including overhead costs s Hourly Salary 8 Benefit costs 4 Employee salaries and benefits paid by Department determined by multiplying columns A and D s Non,b4lable salary and benefits determined by multiplying columns E and F ° Billable salary and benefits determined by subtracting columns E and G • ' Derived by multiplying Billable Salary 8 Benefits (column 1) by the Departmental Indirect Labor percentage, which is 242.11% ° Derived by multiplying the Billable Salary 8 Benefits (column 1) by the Central Services Overhead percentage, which is X00% ° Fully Burdened Direct Labor is the sum of &"a Annual Salary 6 Benefits (column 1). Total Dept Overhead Allocation (column J); Central Services Overhead Allocation (column K) divided by number of employees (column B) 10 Hours are derived by 2,080 annual working hours minus an estimated 250 vacation/holiday, hours (1.800 firs) and multiplied by % of time allocated to the Department less any Non-billable percent " Derived by Fully Burdened Direct Labor divided by Productive Hours 12 Indirect Departmental personnel overhead costs not directly impacted by the user fees. Derived from column G "Non-Meade Annual Salary d Benefits" 13 Allocation determined from the City's Full-Cost Allocation Plan, completed August 2005 by MuniFinancial 14 Department Overhead Allocation Percent determined by dividing total Dept Direct Allocation of $611,283 by Personnel Costs of $262,477 1s Central Services Overhead Allocation Percent determined by dmding total Central Services Overhead Allocation of $0 by Personnel COS15 Of $262,477 10 0 0 TIME ANO MATERIALS (T&A4) SURVEY Determining the amount of time each employee spends on assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential to identify the total cost of providing each service. Identification of these time elements relative to a particular service is most readily determined through the completion of a Time and Materials Survey (T&M Survey). The "time" portion of the survey reflects the average estimated time each department staff position spends on a service. The "materials" portion of this survey refers to the costs of materials spent by the department and is contained within the Departmental Overhead allocation in the FB Hourly Rates. The result of multiplying the FB Hourly Rates by the time spent by each position and adding any third party fees, reflects the actual costs, or total costs of time and materials of providing a service. This is the full cost recovery to the City. A T&M survey provides department management with an opportunity to assess the time requirements for each service by position and record that information onto a spreadsheet. Table 1.2 summarizes the amount of time, listed in five (5) minute intervals for each employee used in providing a specific service to a user. The table also shows the total cost of providing each service plus any third party, required or penalty fees to determine the Full Cost Recovery Fee of providing each service. FULL COST RECOVERY FEE SUMMARY Table 1.2 summarizes the Full Cost Recovery Fees based upon the total cost of providing each service as illustrated by the T&M survey. An analysis of fees adopted by other jurisdictions is used as a benchmark to set the City of Rosemead's fee schedule for the following services performed by the City Clerk's Department. MuniFinancial 11 TABLE 1.2: C/TY CLERK - FEE SCHEDULE ServicelA Ilcatlon City Clerk Assistant to the City Clerk Third Partyl Full Cost Recovery Fee Footnote 1 (1) Fully Burdened Rate z Required/ Penalty (includes 3rd FB Hourly Rate $347 $168 Fee party/required fees) 2 FB Minute Rate FB Hourly Rate/60 Minutes $5.78 $2.80 Average totel me to complete a semce Amount of Time Each Staff Member Occurrence on Each Service in Minutes Fee Notes Fee Notes Fee Notes Filing of Circulators of an Initiative 30 30 84 $ 84 Rosemead Municipal Code Book Actual Cost - Actual Cost - Actual Cos Subpoena for Records Evidence Code Section 1563 20 20 56 56 City Records, Copies Standard or Legal) Color Copies Standard Actual Cost + 20 20 56 56 Color Copies (Legal) Actual Cost + 20 20 56 56 Information Requests Documents not in existence requiring research Actual Cost + 30 30 84 84 Audio Tape Copy 100 + Cost of Tape 100 280 Plus Actual Cost of Materials Plus Actual 280 Cost of Materials Audio Tape Copy if tape provided by requestor 100 100 280 280 CD, Floppy Disk. or Flash Drive Copy 20 + Cost of CD 20 56 Plus Actual Cost of Materials Pius Actual 56 Cost of Materials CD Co if CD or Disk is provided the r uestor 20 20 56 56 DVD Copy 5 + Cost of DVD 35 98 Plus Actual Cost of Materials Plus Actual Cost of Materials DVD Co if DVD is provided b the r uestor 35 35 98 98 City Council Agenda mailed 30 30 84 84 12 • TABLE 7.2: C/Ty CLERK - F££ SCHEDULE Service/Application City Clerk Assistant to the City Clerk Third Party/ Full Cost Recovery Fee Footnote (1) 1) Fully Burdened Rate 2 Required/ Penalty (includes 3rd FB Hourly Rate $347 $168 Fee party/required fees) 2 FB Minute Rate F8 Hourly Rate160 Minutes $5.78 $2.80 verage total time TO complete a service Amount of Time Each Staff Member Occurrence on Each Service in Minutes Fee Notes Fee Notes Fee Notes City Council Minutes mailed 60 60 168 168 Certified Copies of Original Documents 25 10 15 100 100 Notary Fee 25 25 144 144 Reproduction of Public Record Black and White copies 8.5 x 11 Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost 8.5 x 11 Color copies, per page 5 5 14 14 8.5 x 14 Color copies, per page 5 5 14 14 11 x 17 Color copies, per page 5 5 14 14 Custom Size copies Actual Cost - Actual Cost Actual Cos For records where electronic format requested is the same as that used by the City to create copies for its own use Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cos For records where electronic format requested is for a record which is produced only at otherwise regularly schedule intervals, or if "data compilation, extraction, or programming" is required to produce the records ctual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cos Bound records 60 10 50 198 198 Digital photographs on lain paper 35 10 25 128 128 Photographs, slides, transparencies, blueprints, maps and other public records Actual Cost - Actual Cost Actual Cos Records Stored Offsite, Additional Retrieval, Re-File and Transportation Fees 45 20 25 1B5 185 Certification For the first page 5 5 29 29 per 10 page 10 10 58 58 Plans 8 Specs Distribution 45 260 260 Fury BurdanW Hourly Rata delo conedhem Takla 1.1 CM Ct r Deparone.a - Fa Movly Raw annatNry Fuy Burdened Houdy Rule MwW W to the nearest whole dollar and billed per a wvc&nff Dwr 13 • • 0 0 SUMMARY The City Clerk Department generally provides the public with copies of public records, which includes all forms of communication related to public business. Based on the analysis conducted in this chapter, we conclude the following: • The City can charge a separate photocopy fee for materials not set at maximum limits by State law. Photocopy fees are governed by the California Public Records Act, (the "CPRA'~ which limits the fee charged to "the actual direct cost of duplication" (Government Code Section 6276). The CPRA prohibits incorporation of document retrieval costs into the photocopy fee. Actual photocopy costs fluctuate according to the number of copies requested, thus adversely affecting the validity of any cost/revenue comparison. Currently, the City of Rosemead charges ten cents ($0.10) per page for black and white, standard sized copies for such material. The Political Reform Act requires that photocopying charges be set at $0.10 per page for those documents related to election materials. Since this does not include most public records, it is reasonable for the City to charge a separate photocopy fee for all other documents not relating to that Act. • The City Clerk's office is currently providing various services where it can potentially be charging a new fee. These services included: ✓ Information Request ✓ Reproduction of Public Record The fees that will be established for the City Clerk should be used citywide in order to keep reproduction fees consistent. MuniFinancial 14 ql~ CHAPTER 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/ PLANNING DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Planning Division is responsible for the supervision of land use in the Citv, development, updating, maintenance and implementation of the City's General Plan, and provides technical assistance to the Rosemead Community Development Commission. ANALYSIS The Community Development Department asked that we analyze fees for the following services: • Special Map and Database Copies (not established in the City Clerk's fee schedule) • Public Hearing Items • Appeals • Other General Services The purpose of this analysis is twofold: 1) to describe the components involved in determining the total cost based on time and materials; and 2) to show the maximum allowable fee the City can charge based on a 100% recovery level. While it is our intent to show a full cost recovery fee based on full costs, the Citv administration will ultimately decide which fees to adopt based on policy and political considerations. MuniFinancial 15 0 0 TIME ANO MATERIALS fT&MI SURVEY Determining the amount of time each employee spends on assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential to identify the total cost of providing each service. Identification of these time elements relative to a particular service is most readily determined through the completion of a Time and Materials Survey (T&M Survey). The "time" portion of the survey reflects the average estimated time each department staff position spends on a service. The "materials" portion of this survey refers to the costs of materials spent by the department and is contained within the Departmental Overhead allocation in the FB Hourly Rates. The result of multiplying the FB Hourly Rates by the time spent by each position and adding any third party fees, reflects the actual costs, or total costs of time and materials of providing a service. This is the full cost recovery to the City. A T&M survey provides department management with an opportunity to assess the time requirements for each service by position and record that information onto a spreadsheet. Table 2.2 summarizes the amount of time, listed in five (5) minute intervals for each employee used in providing a specific service to a user. The table also shows tine total cost of providing each service plus any third party, required or penalty fees to determine the Full Cost Recovery Fee of providing each service. FULL COST RECOVERY FEE SUMMARY Table 2.2 summarizes the Full Cost Recovery Fees based upon the total cost of providing each service as illustrated by the T&M survey. Table 2.2 also lists the current fees and shows the full cost recovery fees at 100% recovery level. MuniFinancial 18 T-- S.Z. CowArunn-r OcvcLOraILN ~c~r+rvrNa - Few a--- Ph E- 0 t l C..,.", P a r C.-Ay R l t Pam Full Cost Service/ kat{on . D- - op- Mrapm I~ p Am-t I.- 6op+r e e a'a 6 ' Fully Burdened Rate RsgWro4Y Recovery FN Current Fee FeetnoY 11) t1) (1) 111 111 (11 11) (1) Penalty Fee Pectlleaa W- 3a d F6 H-01 Rana 3416 1461 sm FS 1103 so 14® 1>m Fa1114 F11 Minutia Rea ! Hourly ROW00 Mlnvlaa $683 97 79 4549 4430 6372 50.62 67.81 {3.47 total a-i of Tad FArn taa6 M 0-a m Fie, Sn n tarsls Fee alarm Ha NMw Fw Fae rlalaa cepie, Land Use Database Na - Achlal Cost Actual Cwt 35 P. Copy General Plan .cludla back and r 30 to 20 107 5 107 25 P. Copy General Plan M 10 15 20 65 65 5 par Copy Reconstructuon Section Of Code 10 10 20 107 107 Zonis M A Glance Char) 5 10 32 32 Zonis Ma 10 10 20 107 107 5 Par Copy Zml Re emenh S 10 32 32 Zm Ordnance 5 10 20 107 107, 35 Pat Copy Zoning Condit-.1 Use Pwmlm CUP 435 120 240 45 30 2,033 2,033 675 Par T-6- Design Review DR CommercialRa W end 600 120 240 180 30 30 3,045 3,045 390 Per Tmeact- General Plan Amendm of GPA 4S0 ISO 90 60 60 30 30 2.657 2,657 950 Par Transact- Mmici al Code Amendment MCA 450 ISO 90 60 60 30 30 2.657 2,657 925 Per Trausactm Plamed D-.4 them Review PD 270 90 30 60 30 30 30 1,437 1,437 635 Par Transact- Rebef From Ordinance RFO . MorBwiums 195 60 15 30 30 30 30 948 948 300 Par Transact- Reloca0- I act Repon RIR -Mobla Home Pal. 600 too 120 90 90 30 90 3.234 3,234 1,500 Par Transact- Tentatve Pared I Tract Ma a PM I TTM 435 120 90 90 60 30 45 2,419 2,419 1 385 Par Tranacton Tenlzb- Parcel I Tract Mope Per Lot 435 120 90 90 60 30 45 2,419 2,419 100 Per Transact.. Appeal. F4kn Fee 160 60 30 90 1,144 1,144 300 Per Transac9on Pubic Hearf Fee 140 30 5 45 30 30 720 720 38 Par TmasNm Other hams Ocw an Permit 255 60 30 45 60 15 IS 15 15 1,385 1,385 5 P. TmsacBm Site Plan Review 660 120 120 t 80 160 30 30 3,651 3.651 225 Pa Tranactlon Envkonm-W 1 aN Assess-M Ontial 6 1500 240 180 480 540 30 30 9.146 8,146 300 Par Transaction Negative Declaration - Irk -use (if oulaids -ult d is required, lee equals 1o contract cost Plus ■ %of few coal for atln-rskve cwt 1820 300 too 450 540 60 60 5.683 8,883 2,900 Per Tmsmftn MifpNed Negative Declaration - In-house Of outside corautiant is requiredX.=) als to co imcf mM pkn ■ 5b1 total coal 1w adnnWstra 1620 300 180 480 540 60 60 6,683 - 6663 400 Par Tm44ct- EIR - InMuaa (U ouulde consultant Ie required, Na equals to contract coal tors a 5xof taw cwt fa adminYtrsMa cw 2520 600 300 720 720 90 90 13.910 - 13,910 290 Per Transacbon Ma Extensions 240 60 30 45 60 t5 30 1228 1,226 325 Par Tmnctim s2i~nr Lot Use Ad.m,, .t 240 60 30 45 60 15 30 122E 1226 800 Per Tmaachon 0 • T ILL 2.2: Comm- CLVLLO~M£M%P(JwwrwO F£L Rem- Pw • saeree~ Owd n 6 A a Ad we W pM 1 eeneraew ar Cee+ateaT R t Third Party/ Full Cost 5sm"A katlon aq Dr'°°r ooeu Mer' " - p1.- raa a phew nv a s M.Wr. ^ eV arm m. SP-Ad a oear s^'°`W' FuMy Burdened Rate' RequlnN Recovery Fee Current Fee Feelnere p) (U 19 (1) (1) (p DI (1) Penalty Fee Itnclrraea Ira a FS Hourly flab $115 up 3330 Std 1193 M9 164Me SAM pewrwheo1 ) FB Midrib Rab a HWfIY RalaRO MMubs 3697 $772 ISM) M,3M $3.22 70.87 3721 L7 4T ssrw+ x brrma4 d 11 Eec r 6bR Mw 0- m Fdi 6rw n Baia Fr MMM Fr Meba Fee Fee Mole O al Rp.M 360 60 30 240 30 2.06s 2,OBs O.a Tree Perm11 60 30 45 30 45 30 4S 45 1 707 1,703 ton Co LNtr 15 15 45 IS 5 432 432 P tad claw iNa G-ref 9arvkas St-wabr p.-W k""" 0o h.4..pec6.n, meruelMduebial, n sddr6on to Stele bee (includes GM Statbm and Auto Deakn 105 120 t0 120 30 45 30 1 S 15 2.037 2.037 New Fee Stonnwetar p~ anpeceonea4napac9Mr, restawant. in adddat to Sbb bee 105 120 10 120 30 45 30 15 15 2,037 - 2.037 New Fea Appeal of Public Nufcanca Debrmn b City M-9.. payabb ti .dean.., he6 of nfadt is ref uMable it appeal Is eW 345 120 90 60 45 45 45 60 45 2,683 2.663 New Fee Appel of Pubic Nusence DetemlMatlm to CitT Counal. payaale M advance, half of Wo h h re* Mabb if appeal it ell 705 240 160 90 60 45 3,962 - 3,962 Naw Fee New FIYn and A i ""m keaaanaoua Pa-Ift Laun 7p C44W 1 265 60 80 60 501 501 New Fee A" Bus More Book. Maass 115 60 60 60 501 501 New Fee Msssa a valor O eratrn PermR 520 60 60 60 501 S0l New Fee Msasa a 7rchninan Pe1mR e"A 520 60 60 60 Sol Sol New Fee Adult Bus LN< Enlep i 730 60 an 60 501 501 New Fee SeILSennca Stara Fa 490 60 60 60 501 501 New Fee Senior Citizen Meu 610 60 60 60 501 501 New Fee Vehicle Town O on 170 60 60 60 501 501 New Fee Dane. 6 Entarbinmenl Panne (RetWVVW%n 550 60 50 60 501 501 New Fee Fort- TeMin 100 60 60 60 501 501 New Fee Mob&e Nome Prim 90 60 80 60 501 501 New Fee 7.too Ped. 90 60 60 60 501 OMr Busim" Lkrbea Bingo item. applf.6- fee, per PC326.5 ]5 120 60 60 BO 32 Penal Code Secean 1,772 326.5(12) fates fee al 50 - 1,332 New Fe. Buafnaaa rid Anem*f POrrnMa To w ur Business Assstmi Parmh tot Those Nked After Irdbal Applt- 35 60 60 15 464 464 New Fee Tow Cm Bu anew k%peceon Fee incident to permit appicali" 35 10 60 15 249 - 249 New Fee 6me o r Br7e tlMt Permit Fee Ir Ownr and so "t steno at 35 10 60 IS 249 242 New Fee =O Parry Pem1X (htdudes Permi for Emoschm nt Mta Pubic f-Wav} 45 10 60 15 M9 - 249 New Fee P.-M Permit 100 120 60 90 1.373 1,373 New Fee Tem o Use Permit 30 90 60 90 120 60 2295 2.295 _ N- Fzr Y.rd Sal< P<rnNl 30 20 45 231 231 New Frr E • r e4f 2.2: 0 ...Ntrr OLVt•LC~AIa'NT/PLANMINO • F7rl M.-.- rvke! don Pl. O..o. R.e.wYe..w. +E- Ow.ko- ~+er 6 PI.- A..o..n P- A~ A- Pl. hrm Cr^^.rny R.Yb. 6pw,W P.n-T- +r RdW 6psYr.1 ully Burdened Rata' Third Party/ Raquirodl Full Coat Recovery Fee urrent Fee Feelneb (1) 111 P) nl 1+) III l1) III Penalty Fee a I'll Hourly 4416 1167 1170 1256 Sig] W S40 32n FO MMWM ROO H"V RaftM Min YM 9611 17.72 $5.0 $430 LIM SOA2 17.61 47.17 r.ra • An W T.n. Er n"M.nEw Om en Ew 5w h Mk6m Fr r1Pre. Fr rm Fw Fw Ilo1n Fireworks Pw111e 50 20 46 30 256 2S6 New Fee Mind Prm6'. VAd w Ndous Ming 760 120 30 30 30 I 1 New FsP Mimd Pernd: Kwlo rind oMw N.. 6waa .d. 760 120 30 30 30 1,222 1 New Fee Production Fen Melfon Pkaas, TsMridwr, Redo and PAalogrWhic Produce- Pw 1W Production C 163 120 90 30 120 60 30 2.431 2,4311 W. Fee SWMM ProAwaon 165 10 to 30 45 30 602 602 New Fee 'Pwa.rrwwna.r.... w.teral tsrrw 0nrr..n.rw.wre w.w ne. r++r • FW e....e rwre er errr. w. rW .uurr W M...'wrMm. • 0 • SUMMARY CJ This study of the Community Development Department's fee schedule examines fees for community development services related to the Planning Division. These maximum allowable fees are based on time and materials and represent 100% full cost recovery. Based on our analysis, we have determined the following: Much of the fees analyzed in this report are new fees for the City of Rosemead's Community Development Department. These fees were calculated based on average time estimations and are identified in the notes of the "current fee" column as a "new fee." Appendix C, a fee comparison of neighboring jurisdictions shows that many of the fees the City of Rosemead is proposing are similar to those charged by other jurisdictions. Fees identified as "actual cost" are unique services and vary depending on the complexity of the project. Therefore, it is more appropriate to charge a FB Hourly Rate for each service. Generally, we recommend that fees be set at 100% cost recovery levels. MuniFinancial 22 • s CHAPTER 3. ENGINEERING DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The City of Rosemead has a contract with Willdan to provide engineering services. Those services include administrative duties and development review. A retainer of $800 is collected monthly for these services and Willdan bills the public on a time and materials basis. For development review services, Willdan bills the City for both development review and inspection on a time and materials basis. For capital projects, Willdan collects eighteen percent (18%) of the estimated construction cost to compensate for design and construction management services, and then collects additional fees for extra services such as hydrology studies, utility coordination, grant administration, labor compliance, etc. This Agreement was established in July of 1981. ANALYSIS The City of Rosemead asked that we analyze fees for the following services: • Track Map • Parcel Map • Certificate of Compliance (Lot Line Adjustment) • Plan Checking • Construction, Excavation, and Encroachment Permits • Public Improvement Plan Review • Final Subdivision Map Review The purpose of this analysis is twofold: 1) to describe the components involved in determining the total cost based on time and materials; and 2) to show the maximum allowable fee the City can charge based on a 100% recovery level. While it is our intent to show a full cost recovery fee based on full costs, the City administration will ultimately decide which fees to adopt based on policy and political considerations. MuniFinancial 23 0 0 ENGINEER/NO - FS HouRLY RATES SUMMARY Table 3.1 below shows the FB Hourly Rates Summary for the City Engineer position involved in providing the public with engineering services. As described in the Data Collection section, this table illustrates the following: • Direct Labor: The total contracted employee salary paid by the department as illustrated in column E of Table 3.1. This cost of $9,600 is determined from the City's 2006/07 Budget. • Departmental Overhead: Includes the 2006/07 Operating Budget for this division of $506,500 is included as Departmental Overhead. • Central Services Overhead: A Full-Cost Allocation Plan completed by MuriFinancial for the City of Rosemead in 2006 was used to determine the central services allocation of $0. (Appendix B) • Fully Burdened Hourly Rate: By using the methodology listed above, the Fully Burdened Hourly Rate is listed under column "N" of Table 3.1. MuniFinancial 24 TAOLE 3. 7: ENa/NEER/Na DivisiaN -FB HOURLY RATED SUMMARY 506.500 5276.04% " AnmW Saary a 8-1111 Ralea b Nurobar of r Hourly salary 6 ' % of Time Abated to De anrrrnt Engbym Salary 6 8errefh ad t % Non- bieNa Non-billable Amual Saar l % Annual l S d r Bitable A nual Total Dept o d d cordial S l Fully B d d Productive a Fury S d d y Peraannal Chao' Employ- Berea Ralw P p ry the oeparmrnl r Annual y Benarda 1 a a y Bereft to n Salary 6 m ae Abcnlion ' arv raa overbead ur ara prod Labor r Horaa t r a te Hourly Salary 8 Deperdnent Ban.Its' Abcstlon r Labor BenaMa to Personnel Rates " Depar6rrM arM C d Gods v a 5278.04% 0.00% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O'Dked 0-Inbred Jab ClassiicaNens' sdws '0 (100%-F) I (E- G) Overheed% .J•K 15WO 1 Cm Env-Rewror f 0.600 1.00 $ 5 100% S 9,600 0% 6 100% 5 9.600 6 506.500 $ e 518.100 1,Boo S 180 P-ri-Total 9600 IM 9.800 9.600 506.500 516,100 1,e00 0 ' From City's 2006/07 Budget " From City's 2006/07 Budget; Employee salary b benefits paid by the Department (column E Total) less Non-billable Annual Salary 6 Benefits (Column G Total) 2 Average salaries and benefits provided by the Ciry's 2006107 Budget for the respective lob classification and multiplied by the number of employees (Column B) Hourly Salary & Benefit costs per an employee to the Department, not including overhead costs ' Employee salaries and benefits paid by Department determined by multiplying Columns A and D a Non-billable salary and benefits determined by multiplying columns E and F ° Billable salary and benefits determined by subtracting columns E and G 7 Derived by multiplying Billable Salary b Benefits (column 1) by the Departmental Indirect Labor percentage, which is 6276.04% ° Derived by multiplying the Billable Salary 6 Benefits (Column 1) by the Central Services Overhead percentage, which is 0-00% ° Fully Burdened Direct Labor is Me sum of Billable Annual Salary 6 Benefits (column 1). Total Dept Overhead Allocation (column J); Central Services Overhead Allocation (column K) divided by number of employees (Column B) Hours are derived by 2,080 annual working hours minus an estimated 280 vacation/holiday hours (1,800 hrs) and multiplied by % of time allocated to the Department less any Non-billable percent " Derived by Fully Burdened Direct Labor divided by Productive Hours 12 Indirect Departmental personnel overhead costs not directly impacted by the user fees. Derived from column G "Non-billable Annual Salary & Benefits" "Allocation determined from the City's Full-Coal Allocation Plan, completed August 2006 by MuniFinancial " Department Overhead Allocation Percent determined by dividing total Dept Direct Allocation of=606,600 by Personnel Costs of =0 'a Central Services Overhead Allocation Percent detem fined by dividing total Central Services Overhead Allocation Df=0 by Personnel Costs of $8,600 25 • • T/ME AND MATERIALS (7&A4) SURVEY Determining the amount of time each employee spends on assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential to identify the total cost of providing each service. Identification of these time elements relative to a particular service is most readily determined through the completion of a Time and Materials Survey (T&M Survey). The "time" portion of the survey reflects the average estimated time each department staff position spends on a service. The "materials" portion of this survey refers to the costs of materials spent by the department and is contained within the Departmental Overhead allocation in the FB Hourly Rates. The result of multiplying the FB Hourly Rates by the time spent by each position and adding any third party fees, reflects the actual costs, or total costs of time and materials of providing a service. This is the full cost recovery to the City. A T&M survey provides department management with an opportunity to assess the time requirements for each service by position and record that information onto a spreadsheet. Table 3.2 summarizes the amount of time, listed in five (5) minute intervals for each employee used in providing a specific service to a user. The table also shows the total cost of providing each service plus any third party, required or penalty fees to determine the Full Cost Recovery Fee of providing each service. F'LiLL COST RECOVERY FEE SUMMARY Table 3.2 summarizes the Full Cost Recovery Fees based upon the total cost of providing each service as illustrated by the T&M survey. Table 3.2 also lists the current fees and shows the full cost recovery fees at 100% recovery level. The table illustrates how much the City's current fees rank to the full cost recovery fees determined by this report. However, since the City of Rosemead contracts with Willdan for engineering services and Willdan bills the City at 100% full cost recovery levels, there are no subsidies in this division. MuniFinancial TAILL 3.2: CmorimLER/NO - Fcr 6CMLOULL Service/A Ilcation City Engineer Retains Third Part / Full Cost Footnote 11) Full Burdened Rate2 y Required/ Recovery Current Fee FB Hourly Rah $ISO y P lt F Fee FB Minute Rah FS Hourly Ralaf80 Minutes S2.50 ena y ee Includes 7b varspe WW bm to e a wMCa rrence on erv Minutes Fee Notes Fe Nona Fw Fee Now. Tract Ms Tentative Tract Ma S 270 Full Cost $ S 270 S 270 Record Ma Analysis 2.850 Full Cost - 2,850 2,850 Additional Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost 50 50 Monument Review 370 Full Cost - 370 370 Deterred Monument Review 300 Full Cost - 300 300 Ma VerKca0on 255 Full Cost 255 255 Ma Clearance Review 300 FN Cost 300 300 -Tract Me Check Submittal 450 Full Cost 450 450 Parcel Ma Tentative Parcel Ma 270 Full Cost 270 270 Record Ma Analysis 2,000 Full Cost 2,000 2,000 Additional Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost 50 50 Dedications 750 Full Cost 750 750 Monument Review 370 Full Cost 370 370 Ma VerKCahon 225 Full Cost 225 225 Ma Clearance Review 300 Full Cost 300 300 Parcel Ma Check Submittal 450 Full Cost 450 450 Certificate of Compllanca Lot Une Adjustment) Record Document Analysis 60D Full Cost 600 600 Additional Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost 50 s0 Verification Of Compliance 225 Full Cost 225 225 Review of Agreements 225 Full Cost 225 225 • • 27 TABLE 9.2: ENO/NEER/NQ - FEE SUMV42UI-C Service/Application Cxy Entim-R~er Third Paul " Full Cost Footnote (1) Full Burdened Rate' y Required/ Recovery Current Fee FO Hourly Rau $150 y P F lt Fee F8 Minute Rate F8 Hourty Ra1d80 Minutes $2.50 ena y ee Includ.a 3rd Average totell rrr to s a service rrenw on x e n Minutes Fea Noh■ Fas Notas Faa Fn Nobs Plan Checking Initial Plan Check 5800 plus 4.5% of the first 550,000, _ plus 3% of the next $100,000, plus 1.5% thereafter of the estimated construction cost _ $800 plus 4.5% of the first $50,000, plus 3% of the next $100,000, plus 1.5% thereafter of the estimated construction cost. lan Check Revision $800 plus 4.5% of the first $50,000. _ plus 3% of the next $100,000, plus 1.5% nlereafter of the estimated construction cosL _ $800 plus 4.5% of the first $50.000. plus 3% of the next $100,000, plus 1.5% thereafter of the estimated construction coat. Construction Permits Issuance Fee 50 - - 50 50 Initial Observation - $500, plus 6% of the first $100,000, - 5500, plus 6% of the first $100,055 plus 5% of the next $100,000, plus 4% thereafter of the estimated construction cost. Modifications Observation - Actual Cost Actual Cost Driveway 250 Per Driveway 250 250 Per Driveway Close Existing Driveway Opening 250 Per Driveway 250 250 Per Driveway Individual Sidewalk I Sidewalk FYI-In 250 Per Location - 250 250 Per Location Individual Curb / Gutter 200 Per Locabon 200 200 Per Location Individual Alley Improvement 3 Per S Foot/ Location 3 3 Per S q. Foot / Location Street Trees 50 First Tree 50 So First Tree Additional Street Trees 25 Every Tree Thereafter 25 25 Every Tree Thereafter Curb Drain 150 Per Drain 150 150 Per Drain Parkway Drain 300 Per Drain - 300 300 Per Drain Relocate Existing Drains Structure 1,000 Per Structure 1,000 1,000 Per Structure Excavation Permits Service Cut $17.50 / cut and $2 for each sq. ft. • of excavation 517.501 cut and 52 for each sq. ft. of excavation Main Line _ $2 per sq. ft. for each sq. ft. of excavation - _ $2 per sq. ft. for each sq. ft. of excavation Sewer Cuts Residential 250 Connection To Main 250 250 Connection To Main Sewer Cu15 Commercial 350 Connection To Main 350 350 Connection To Main • • TAILL 3.2: ENO/NEER/NO - FEL 5QNEOULL Service/Application Cay Engineer Rata er Third Part l Full Cost Footnote (1) Full Burdened Rate' y Required/ Recovery Current Fee FB Hourty Rate 11150 y P l F Fee FS Minute Rats FB Hourly Ratera0 Minutes 52.50 ena ty ee includes 3rd vetage total me to ERi;RW* s sarWCe mnce on Each erv ca n Minutes Fee Notes Fee Not- Fee Fee Novas Encroachment Permits Stockpile Material I Waste In Street Ri t-Of-W 200 Per Stockpile 200 200 Per Stockpile Pladn Container In Street Ri t-Of-We 250 Per Container (Refundable) 250 250 Per Container Refundable Placing Temporary Structure / Equipment In Street Right- Of-Way 200 Per Structure 200 200 Per Structure Pedestrian Protection Reuired B Building Code 200 Per Location 200 200 Per Location Street Closures 200 Per Location 200 200 Per Location Commercial Filming -Weekday 400 Per Day 400 400 Per Day Ccmmeraal Filming - Weekends Nights, 3 Holidays SW Per Da 800, 800 Per Da Olher Encroachments N f 50 Issuance Fee, Plus Actual Costs 50 50 Issuance Fee. Plus Actual Costs ed ew wa Public Improvement Plan Review Foe Major Improvement Plan Review base fee 625 625 1,563 1,563 Now Fee plus each lot 25 25 63 63 New Fee Minor Improvement Plan Review base fee 450 450 1,125 1,125 New Fee plus each lot 25 25 63 63 New Fee Final Subdivislon Ma Review Fee M& or Major Final Ma Review base fee 650 650 1,625 1.6 25 New Fee plus each lot 30 30 75 75 New Fee Major Subdivision Map- Acceptance of Improvements and Dedications 800 600 1.500 - 1,500 New Fee Major Subdivision Map- Amendment of Subdivision Agreement 350 350 875 - 875 New Fee Minor Minor Parcel Ma Review base fee 500 500 1,250 - 1,250 New Fee us each lot 30 30 75 75 Now Fee Minor Subdivision Map- Acceptance of Improvements and Dedications 225 225 583 563 New Fee Minor Subdivision Map- Amendment of Subdivision Agreement 120 120 300 - 300 New Fee New lot fee Actual Cost 0 - Actual Cost Actual Cost New Fee Base Ma Revision Fee 10 10 25 25 New Fee Grease Trap Plan Review Fee 30 30 75 75 New Fee Document Retrieval Fee 20 20 50 50 New Fee Stop Signs, each intersection, installed b City 150 150 375 375 New Fee Street Lights. each intersection, installed b City 50 50 125 125 New Fee • • 29 TAILL 3.2: Cmatm pima - FKw BQNCouLE Service/Application 0ty Engineer Reta i Third Part / Full Cost Footnoa (1) Full Burdened Rate2 y Required/ Recovery Current Fee FS Hourly Rate s+so y F P l Fee F8 Wim to Rita F8 Hourty Rat*M Minutes f2.50 ena ty ee imfudss 3rd wWe WW &m W e s servke snw on m Minutes Fse Notes Fw Not" Fes Fes Motes Speed Bums each installed b C' 125 125 313 313 New Fee Parade Permit 10 10 25 25 New Fee Parcel Mere 120 120 300 300 New Fee ~ FWr eueaama 1W/r 0.W eMwmYwl aem Taeh 11. F yYrefYa • fe 11aF1/ Rahn 6umrry FWr Owdw Hwtj RW rauridadber nrr rs aWr bps Cab pe•-ppf m w.. am.t Cee r e.rrr a. sr sdr wdwrd na.N 41. p~b.sr nasebr a pppw sr aae.a. w oe+....a.w r m. naaae dapr • • 30 0 0 CHAPTER 4. FINANCE DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES 'I'he Finance Department provides for the administration of payroll, accounting, purchasing, preparation of the City's budget and reports to regulatory agencies. ANALYSIS The City does not have an adopted fee schedule for services performed by the Finance Department. Therefore, any fees currently collected are billed as the "actual cost" of materials with no administrative overhead. As such, the current fee schedule is not 100% cost recoverable. An analysis of fees adopted by other jurisdictions is used as a benchmark to set the City of Rosemead's fee schedule for the following services performed by the Finance Department: • Permit Applications • Business License Processing Fees The purpose of this analysis is twofold: 1) to describe the components involved in determining the total cost based on time and materials; and 2) to show the maximum allowable fee the City can charge based on a 100% recovery level. While it is our intent to show a full cost recovery fee based on full costs, the City administration will ultimately decide which fees to adopt based on policy and political considerations. MuniFinancial 31 0 0 F/NAmcE - FS HOURLY RATES SLIMMARY Table 4.1 below shows the FB Hourly Rates Summary for the Finance Department positions involved in providing the publics with permit applications and business licensing services. As described in the Data Collection section, this table illustrates the following: • Direct Labor: The total employee salary and benefits paid by the department as illustrated in column E of Table 4.1. Personnel costs of $461,800 were determined from the City's 2006/07 Budget. • Departmental Overhead: Includes the non-billable annual salary of $110,906 for the positions of Director of Finances/MIS, Finance Assistant, Receptionist/Cashier, Account Technician, and Office Assistant. These positions are considered "non- billable" because a percentage of their salary is not directly tied to the Time and Materials Survey. However, since these salaries are budgeted in this department, it is included in the Departmental Overhead Costs. Additionally, the 2006/07 Operating Budget for this division of $584,900 is included as Departmental Overhead. • Central Services Overhead: A Full-Cost Allocation Plan completed by MuniFinancial for the City of Rosemead in 2006 was used to determine the central services allocation of $0. (Appendix B) • Fully Burdened Hourly Rate: By using the methodology listed above, the Fully Burdened Hourly Rate is listed under column "N" of Table 4.1. MuniFinancial 32 TARLL 4. 1-' F-NCL -FB HOURLY RATES SUMMARY Mnud Salary s Numoer of Hourly Salary l %d Time Allocadwo Employee Salary d % Non-dMabb Nor 4AaW Am" % Maud Bill" Total Dept G.,*W Flay Burde Productive Fully Beneat Rat by EmploY-, 848401 Rat. , m Departs w" BaneOrt paid by the Maraud Saary J. Salary a Beneeb' Sean, a Mnud 0-head Samrwe Deb Labor' Haura w Burdened ,_nd C1aaa r paparvanru' a-bli, b DaP.Ir-r,1 O t3aMab to Dem.rbn it P l Salary S Be-ft. Aso_5_ I Overhead Abcason' Hourly Labor Rai„ verhead ersonne Coen 196.30% 0,00% A B C 0 E F G H 1 J K L M N ( Job ClauMkird- Sala (A1180018 Aro E'F too%- F %11 Orarhe % I.J•K ISMS 1f LILI M Firs./415 S 176,545 1.00 S N 5518 8 87.100 50% S ""So 50% f 46,550 S 86.272 S - S 1",622 4115 t 293 Yarn AaaYa 105,643 t. 1 0 S9 too% 105,943 10% 10,584 90% 0 So 188.691 284,152 1 1620 ITS IcA 68208 1, 0 0 38 60% 51.566 20% 10.913 60% ..3 3 3 Be Set 130.21.. 1.152 113 Teom- 181.256 3 00 34 100% 181.250 20% 36.257 eox 1as ,005 , 2a7.s38 1".181 1,140 100 Oft. Aarda4 23.035 1.00 13 100% 23.035 217% 4,607 60% 1a X78 36.541 54,969 1,600 71 Poeadon Tatar 554,887 7.00 481 800 110 906 350 694 895.806 Ise 338 6507 From City's 200SM7 Budget „ From City's 2008107 Budget. Employee salary 6 benefits paid by the Department (Golan E Totem less Non billable Annual Salary & Benefits (column G Total) ' Average salaries and benefits provided by the Ceys 2006107 Budget for the respective (ob classification and multiplied by the number of employees (Column B) s Hourly Salary 6 Simarfil costs per an employee to the Department: not irlduding overhead costs ' Employee salaries and berlafms paid by Depawnent determined by multiplying col r ns A and D s Non-billable salary and benefits detemllned by multiplying columns E and F s Billable salary and benefits determined by subtracting columns E and G T Derived by multiplying Billable Salary 6 Benefits (column 1) by the Departmental Indirect Labor percentage, which is 196.30% s Derived by multiplying the Billable Salary 6 Benefits (column p by the Central Services Overhead percentage, which is 0,00% a Fully Burdened Direct Labor is the sum of Billable Annual Salary 6 Benefits (column 1); Total Dept Overhead Allocation (column J); Central Services Overhead Allocation (column K) divided by number of employees (column B) to Hours are derived by 2,080 annual waking hours menus r estmlaled 250 vaulon/hoWry hours (1,600 hms) and mWOpbed by % of time allocated to the Department lass arty Non-billable percent 11 Derived by Fully Burdened Dared Labor divided by Productive Hours 1t Indirect Departmental personnel overhead costs not directly impacted by Me user fees. Derived from column G'Non-bi6able Annual Salary E Benefits' 1s Allocation determined from the City's Full-Cost Allocation Plan, completed August 2006 by MuniFinancial 14 Department Overhead A6ocabon Percent determined by dividing total Dept Direct Allocation of $696,806 by Personnel Costs of X350,694 is Canbal Services Overhead Allocation Percent datennlrod by dividing total Central Services Overhead Allocation of 60 by Personnel Costs of 6350,694 14 Took average salary and benefits of the job classifioelions with those positions with more than one employee E 33 0 0 T/ME ANO MATERIALS (T&A4) SURVEY Determining the amount of time each employee spends on assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential to identify the total cost of providing each service. Identification of these time elements relative to a particular service is most readily determined through the completion of a Time and Materials Survey (T&M Survey). The "time" portion of the survey reflects the average estimated time each department staff position spends on a service. The "materials" portion of this survey refers to the costs of materials spent by the department and is contained within the Departmental Overhead allocation in the FB Hourly Rates. The result of multiplying the FB Hourly Rates by the time spent by each position and adding any third party fees, reflects the actual costs, or total costs of time and materials of providing a service. This is the full cost recovery to the City. A T&M survey provides department management with an opportunity to assess the time requirements for each service by position and record that information onto a spreadsheet. Table 4.2 summarizes the amount of time, listed in five (5) minute intervals for each employee used in providing a specific service to a user. The table also shows the total cost of providing each service plus any third party, required or penalty fees to determine the Full Cost Recovery Fee of providing each service. FULL COST RECOVERY FEE SUMMARY Table 4.2 summarizes the Full Cost Recovery Fees, based upon the total cost of providing each service as illustrated by the T&M survey, for services that the City is currently providing to the publics or will provide to the publics in the near future. MuniFinancial 34 TABLE 4.2! FWANCE- FEE SCHEDULE Service/A Ilcation Dh.uel of F- M.i.s. Fnelge A..iu.m Reoepbo bm Cwhfer Account T..hnk". A.i.1am ON.- Fully Burdened = Third Party/ Required/ Penalty Full Cost Recovery Fee (meet,.. S d Current Fee Footnote 0) (1) (1) (1) (1) Rate Fee p.rtyn.qui.d FB Hourly Rate $283 $175 $113 $100 $31 ) 2 FB Minute Rate FB Hourly Ratel60 Minutes $4.88 52.92 $1.6$ $1.67 $0.51 en9e me o 0off4do WV- Alnaelt M Time Fxh St n Menleer doculrenca w Eudl eerrin to Minus. Fw NoW Fw Nose: Fw Fw Not. SF checks 0 5 5 0 41 - 41 Per Civil Code 1719, maximum allowable charge for fiml NSF check is S25 and for second and each subse"m NSF check is $35 Stop payment/check re4ssuance 20 5 5 10 41 1 4 New F. Yard Sale Permit 10 10 17 17 New F- Coov of Bud eVCAFR/CIP Documents Actual Cost - Actual Cost - Actual Cosl Actual Cost New F. Business License Listl on CD 15 15 8 81 New F. Business Ucense Processing Fees Business Processing Fee/Pennit F 75 10 30 5 20 10 184 184 wwFee Annual Renewal Processing Fee 40 5 15 5 10 5 97 97 New Fee Duplicate ertifieate 15 5 10 54 54 New Fee Chancie of Location 15 15 44 44 New Fee FIr ev.w.e Mov1y ter. 4rrliW ew. T.eb 4.1. f>l.o - R Move Rate eolnlwf NoY Fleei Cpl • re`ee r er eaY emenW enAr 1W site Mry w~W b mnMee em rlrte. er mo r loule.e m M relw eoev 0 SUMMARY This study of the Finance Department's fee schedule examines fees for permit applications and business license processing services. These maximum allowable fees are based on time and materials and represent 100% full cost recovery. Based on our analysis, we have determined the following: • Many services are currently subsidized by the General Fund monies. • Appendix C, a fee comparison of neighboring jurisdictions shows that many of the fees the City of Rosemead is proposing are similar to those charged by other jurisdictions. • Fees identified as "actual cost" are unique services and vary depending on the complexity of the project. Therefore, it is more appropriate to charge a FB Hourly Rate for each service. Generally, we recommend that fees be set at 100% cost recovery levels. MuniFinancial 36 0 0 CHAPTER 5. PARKS & RECREATION DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Parks and Recreation Department administers and coordinates all park, recreation, and related functions in the City. Specifically, the department coordinates all recreation programs, classes, adult/youth sports leagues, special events, civic and cultural programs, and volunteer services. ANALYSIS The Parks and Recreation department requested that we analyze fees for the following divisions: • Parks Admin • Parks • Recreation • Aquatics • Recreation Fee & Charge • Aquatics Fee & Charge • Dinsmoor Heritage House Parks and Recreation Department is unlike other departments within the City because its services are rental charges. Instead of using a T&M analysis to determine the full cost recovery fee for this department, we conducted a Cost of Services Analysis, Table 5.1, using the Macro Cost vs. Revenue method described on page 7. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the current cost recovery level for the department and for each program that the department oversees. Dividing the total revenue by the total fully burdened expenses derives the cost recovery level for the department, and dividing the expected revenue for each program by the fully burdened cost of each program derives the cost recovery level for each program. The fully burdened expenditure includes personnel cost, operating and capital outlay costs, and central services overhead from the Cost Allocation Plan. The analysis indicates that approximately 5.80% of General Fund costs attributable to Parks and Recreation Department services are being recovered through fees. Generally, we recommend that fees be set closer to 100% cost recovery level. However, some fees, if set at that level, would preclude the participation of a number of residents, and possibly lead to the termination of the service. MuniFinancial 37 TABLE S. l: PARKS & RECREATION - COST OF SERVICES ANALYSIS Total Revenues vs. Full Costs otal Fully Burdened Cost Personnel Expenses for FY 2006-07 $ 1,722,310 Operating & Capital Outlay for FY 2006-07 ' 3,384,520 Central Services Overhead 2 7" Iio Fully Burdened Cost $ 5,828,949 Service/Application Account Numbers Personnel' Operating & Capital Outlay ' Total Program Budget 1 Central Services Overhead 2 Fully Burdened Cost 3 Expected Revenue' % of Cost Recovery 4 Subs l /P rofit/Sufficient 5 A B C A+B D E C+D F G F/E Parks Admin 4800 $ 365,470 $ 13,900 $ 379,370 64,189 443,559 $ - 0.00% Subsidize $ 443,559 Parks 4810 2,465,430 2,465,430 294,535 2,759,965 17,000 0.62% Subsidize 2,742,965 Recreation 4820 1,059,910 141,040 1,200,950 201,337 1,402,287 68.000 4.85% Subsidize 1,334,287 Aquatics 4830 178,410 483,650 662,060 94,544 756,604 0.00% Subsidize 756,604 Recreation Fee & Charge 4840 99,470 263,000 362,470 61,330 423,800 220,400 52.01% Subsidize 203,400 Aquatics Fee & Charge 4850 19,050 7,000 26,050 4,408 30,458 32.500 106.71% Profit 2,042 Dinsmoor Heritage House 4870 10,500 10,500 1,777 12,277 - 0.00% Subsidize 12,277 Total $ 1,722,310 $ 3,384,520 $ 5,106,830 $ 722,119 $ 5,828,949 $ 337,900 ' From the City FY 2006-07 Budget. 2 From Cost Allocation Plan prepared for the City of Rosemead by MunlFinanclal. 3 The Fully Burdened cost includes personnel, operating and capital outlay, and central services costs. The personnel cost includes salary and benefits. ` Percentage represents the cost recovery level of each program. 5 Indicates the performance of each program. 6 Parks & Recreation Department recovers 5.80% of the fully burdened cost. 10 • 38 0 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS MuniFinancial 39 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS Fully Burdened Rah (per occurs,../case) Servi-/Application Third Party/ Required Fee Full Cost Recovery Fee (Includes 3rd party/ required fees) Current Fee Subsidy (full cost recovery fee loss current feel Fee Notes The City Clerk's office is responsible for conducting all elections, maintaining official etty data for Council agendas, takes and transcribes Council minutes, conducts election pr Fec -Notes ec Fee Notes I Fee City Clerk files and performing necessary cletleel work in conjunction with the City Council. The City Clerk collects ocedures, updates the munlc/pal code, and Is responsible to and serves under the direction ofthe City Council. din of i:ecula;ors e! an nmairve 5 Ba S S 8a New Fee I - Rosemead Municipal Code Book - Actual Cost - New Fee rVa Subpoena for Records (Evidence Code Section 1563) 56 _ 56 New Fee Na City Records Copies Standard or New Fee Na Color Copies Standard 56 Se New Fee Na Color s 11-agal) 56 56 Inforritation Requests Documents not in exist enee rewilina research 84 New Fee Na Audio Tape Copy 280 Plus Actual goal of - Materiels 280 New Fee Na Audio Tape Co if tape provided b re uestor 280 280 New Fee Na CD, Floppy Disk, or Flash Dnve Copy 56 - Plus Actual Cost of Materials 56 New Fee We CD Co If C or Disk is provided b tie reaussw 56 56 New Fee Na DVD Copy 98 Plus Actual Cost of - Materials New Fee Na DVD Co if DVD is provided the reaussicir 98 oa t New Fee Na City Council Agenda mailed e4 84 New Fee We City Council Minutes mailed 168 168 New Fee We Certified Copies of Original Documents 100 100 New Fee Na Note Fee 144 144 New Fee Na New Fee Na Reproduction of Public Record Black and While copies 8.5 x 11 - Actual Cost New Fee Na 8.5 x 11 Color coies r 14 14 New Fee No 8.5 x 14 Color copies, 14 14 New Fee Na 11 x 17 Color copies, per a 14 14 New Fee Na Custom Sue copies - Actual Cost Now Fee No F by the City to create copies or records where electron; fonrtal requested is the sterns, as that used - Actual Cost - New Fee Na For records where electronic formal requested is for a record which is produced only at otherwise regularly schedule intervals, or d'dats compilation. extraction, or programming' Is required to produce the . Actual Cost New Fee s Bound records i98 198 New Fee Na Digital ographs on paper plain 128 126 New Fee Ns Photographs, slides, transparencies. blueprints, maps and other pubic records - Actual Cost - New Fee Ne R Feet ecords Stored Off lte. Additional Retrieval. Re-File and Transportation 185 185 Now Fee Certification For the first a e 29 29 New Fee Na per 10 page 58 58 New Fee Na Plans 8 Specs Distribution 260 260 New Fee No 40 APPENDIx A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS Full Cast Recovery Fee Fully (per Burd Burr nened Wwse Rate ) Third Partyl Required Fee (includes 3rd party/ Current Fee required fees) Service/Application - Subsidy Ifull cost recovery tee less current feel e~ elates 1 Notes ice Fer 1Jates Fe< Community DevelopmenWienning Division The Planning Division Is responsible for the supervision of land use In the City, development updating, maintenance and Implementation of the City's General Plan, and provides technical assistance to lyle Rosemead Communhy Development Commission. Cap- land Use Ualabase - Actual Coal - Actual Cos! 35 Per Copy Iva General Plan (including background report) 107 107 25 Per CA 82 General Plan Ms 65 65 5 Per Co 60 Reconstructwon Section Of Code 107 107 107 Zoning At A Glance Chan 32 32 - Per Co 32 ZOmn M 107 107 5 102 Zonis Requirements 32 32 - Per Co 32 Zoning Ordinance 107 107 35 72 Public Hearin Items Conditional Use Perfnds CLIP 2033 2.D33 875 Per Transaction 1,158 Design Review DR Commaroal/Residential 3,045 3,045 390 Per Transacbon 2,655 General Plan Amendment OPA 2,657 2,657 950 Per Transaction 1,707 Muniu a! Code Amendment MCA 2.657 2,657 925 Per Transaction 1,732 Planned Development Review PD 1,437 1,437 635 Per Transaction 802 Relief From Ordinance RFO - Montanums 940 948 300 Per Transaction 648 Relocation Impact Re n RIR - Mobile Homo Parks 3,234 3,234 1,500 Per Transaction 1.734 Tentative Parcel / Tract Maps PM i TTM 2.419 2 419 1,385 Per Transaction 1,034 Tentative Parcel / Tract Ma s Per Lot 2,419 2 419 100 Par Transaction 2,319 Appeals Filing Fee 1.144 1 1M 300 Per Transaction 844 Public Hearing Fee 720 720 38 Per Transaction 683 Other Mons Occu an Pemvl 1,385 1 385 225 Par Transaction 1,160 Site Plan Review 3,651 3,651 225 Per Transaction 3,426 Enwmnmental Impact Assessment initial Shidy) 8,146 8 148 300 Per Transaction 7,846 EIR - Plus Outside Conwitant 8,683 8,683 2,900 Per Transaction 5,783 Me Extensions 9,683 8,683 400 Per Transaction 8.283 Minor Lot Line Aduslment 13,910 13.910 290 Per Transaction 13,620 Geological Report 1 228 1,228 325 Per Transaction 903 Oak Tree Perms 1,228 - - - 1228 800 Per Transaction 428 Zomn Com laince Leber Nawfsar 11111111111 7 2065 . 12 2065 1 - 2.065 . 11 General Services , Stormwaler pent inspecLONre-inspection, mmrorcial/indushul, m adds - n to Stale fees lindudes as Startions and Auto Dtaltri) 2,037 2.037 - New Fee Na Stormwater permit inspadionfre-inspection, restaurant, in addition to Slate fees 2,037 2,037 - New Fee Na Appeal of Pubk Nuisance Determination to City Manspar, payable m advance. haff of mfich is refundable if appeal Is upheld 2,863 2,563 - New Fee Na Appeal of Public Nuisance Determination to City Council, payable m advance, 3.962 3,962 - New Fee Na Now Filing ■nd Application Miscallensoua Permits: Laundry/Dry Clean. In-Citv 501 501 - New Fee Na Adult Bus Movie Book Massalls 501 501 New Fee Ne Massage Parlor Operating Pennit 501 501 - New Fee Na Massa a Technician Permit 501 501 - Now Fee Na Adult Bus Lwe Entertammen! 501 501 - New Fee Na Self-Service Storage Facility 501 501 New Fee Na 0 0 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS ervice/Application ication Fully Burdened Rate (per occurencdcase) Third Party/ RequiqF" Full Cost Recovery Fee (includes 3M party! required fees) Current Fw Subsidy (h9 cost recovery fee leas current fes) N o oe Fee Fee Notes Fw Senior Citizen n Housino 501 501 New Fee Na Vehide Timiria ration 501 501 - New Fee Na Dance d Entertainment Pemtil RetaiNM 501 501 - Naw Fee Na Fortune TeRM M 501 501 - New Fee Na Mobile Home Parks 501 501 - New Fee Na Tatoo Parbr 501 Na Odw Business Lkemsa Bingo license application fee. per PC326.5 CA Penal Code Section 326.5(12) 1332 its he at SW t 332 - New Fee Na Bua/nasa and AnIm&f Permits Tow Car Business Assistant Perrot for These Hired Alter Indial Aookstion 464 464 - New Fee No Tow Car Business Inspection Fee ind 1 to rrrt' application 249 249 New I'm Na Tow Car Business Permit Fee for 0vmer and at assistants at lime of acclimation 249 - - 249 - New Fee Na Bock Parry Peffnd (atdudes Pamtit for Ersoachmard into Public Right- 249 249 - New Fee No Parade Permit 1,373 1,373 - New Fee Na Temorary Use PermN 2,295 2,295 - New Fee rile Yard Sale Permit 231 231 - New Fee Na Fireworks Perms 258 256 New Fee rve Animal Permit Kee i VVgd or Vicious Animal 1222 1,222 - New Fee Na Animist Pemut Keeping animal other than Those specified 1,222 1 222 - New Fee Na Production Fees Motion Picture, Television, Radio and Pholographic Production Pamta, per e Production Cam nies 2,431 52:431 New Fas We Student Production 602 602 New Fee Na Engineering The City of Rosemead has a contract with Wlildan to provide engineering services. Those services Include administratlyo duties and development review. A retainer of $800 Is collected monthly for these services and Wiildan bills the public on a time and materials basis. Trace M.tp Tertative Tract Ma 270 Full Cost - - 270 270 Rewrd Ma Analysis 2,850 Full Cost 2,850 2,850 Addilional Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost 50 50 Monument Review 370 Full Cost 370 370 Deferred Monument Review 300 Full Cost 300 300 Ma Venfi"bon 255 Full Cost 255 255 Ma Clearance Review 300 Fug Cost 300 300 Tract Ma Check Submittal 450 Full Cost 450 450 Parcel Map Tentative Parcel Ma 270 Full Cost 270 270 Rewrd Ma Analysis 2,000 Full Cost 2,000 2 000 Additional Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost 50 50 Dedir bcns 750 Full Cost 750 750 Monument Review 370 Fug Cost 370 370 Ma Verification 225 Full Cost 225 225 M¢ Clearance Review 300 Full Cost 300 300 Parcel Ma Check Submittal 450 Full Cost 450 450 Grtifiate of Compliance (Lot Lim Adjustment) APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS ervicalA lic,tlon Fully Burdened Rate (per occurancelcase( Third Partyl Required Fee Full Cost Recovery Fee (Include, 3rd party/ required fees) Cumerd Fee Subsidy (full cost recovery fee less current feel Fee Notes ee Notes Fee Fee Note, Fee Record D-rit Analysis 600 Full Cost 600 600 Additional Per Lot Cost 50 Full Cost so 50 Verification Of Coco fiance 225 Full Cost 225 225 Review of A urems 225 Full Cost 225 225 Plan Chacldn Initial Plan Check $800 plus 4.5% of the first 650,000, plus 3% of the next 5700,000, plus 1.5% thereafter of the estimated - construction cost sow plus 4.5% of the first 550,000, plus 3% of the next 6100,000, plus 1.5% thereafter of the estimated construction cost. lan Chack Revision 3800 plus 4.5% of He fast $50.000, plus 3% of the next 6100.000. plus 1.5% thereafter of the estimated - construction cost $800 plus 4.5% of the fast 550,000. plus 3% of the next $100,000, plus 1.5% thereafter of the estimated construction cost Construction Permits Issuance Fee 50 50 50 Initial Observalion $50D, plus 6% of the fast $100,000, plus S% of the next 57 D0,000, plus 4% thereafter of the estimated - construction cost $500, plus 6% of the first $100,D00, plus 5% of the next 11100,000. plus 4% thereafter of the estimated construction cost. Modifications Observation - Actual Cost - Actual Cosl Driveway 250 Par Drivevvay 250 250 Per Onvewa Close Existi Driveway O ni 250 Par Driv 250 250 Per Dfrvewa Individual Sidewalk I Sidewalk Fill-ir 250 Par Location 250 250 Per Location Individual Curb I Gutter 200 Par Location 200 200 Per Localion Individual Allay Improvement Per Sq. Foot I Location 3 - 3 3 Per Sq. FOOT / Location - Street Trees 50 Fist Tree 50 50 First Tree Additional Street Trees 25 Every Tree Thereafter - - 25 25 Every Tree Thereafter Curb Drain 150 Per Drain 150 150 Per Drain Parkway Drain 300 Par Drain 300 300 Par Drain Relocate Existing Drainage Structure 1,000 Per Structure 1,0D0 1,00D Per Structure Excavation Permits Service Cut $17.501 Gut and 2 tot each sq. ft. of • excavation 317.50 I Cut and $2 for each sq, R. of excavation Main line 2 per sq, fL or each . ft. of excavation - _ $2 per sq. h. for each sq. ft. of excavation Sewer Cuts Residenlia 250 Gonnedwn To Main 250 250 Connection To Main Sewer Cuts 00rrarterCJal 350 Connection To Main 350 350 Connection To Main Encroachment Permits Stockpile Material I Waste In Street Right-Cif-Way 200 Per Stockpile 200 2D0 Per Stockpile Placing Container In Street Right-01-We Per Container 250 Refundable _ _ _ _250 Per Container 250 (Refundable). • • APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS ervicelApplicetlon Fully Burdened Rate (per Burr ne d Raft Third Parted Required Fee Full Cost Recovery Fee (includes 3rd party/ required lees) Cunvnt Fee Subsidy (full cost recovery tea less current M) w o es es Notes se Fee Notes Fee Placing Tam rs Structure I E ui men/ In Street Ri hl-Of-Wa 200 Per Structure 200 200 Per Structure Pedestrian Protection Reuired Building Code 200 Per Location 200 200 Per Location Street Closures 200 Per Location 200 200 Per Location Comnerud Filming - Weekday 400 Per D 400 400 Per D Commerual Filming _ Weekends, Nights, d g00 Per Day goo 900 Per D Other Enuoachmems Pop aimed NewFem Issuance Fee, Plu 50 Actual Costs _ 50 issuance Fee, Plus Actual 50 Costs _ p Public Improvement Plan Review Fee Na Maio( Im rovement Plan Review base fog] 1,563 1,563 - New Fee Na plus each lot 63 63 - New Fes Na Minor Im rovemenl Plan Review base fool 1,125 1 125 - New Fee n/a us each lot 63 63 - New Fee We Final Subdivision Ma Review Fee Major Millar Final M Review (base fee 1,525 1,525 - New Fee We plus each lot 75 75 - New Fee No Major Subdivision Map. Acceptance of Improvements and Dedications 1 500 _ 1,500 - New Fee Na Mati Subdivision Ms AmerMmem of Su ion A reament 975 975 - New Fee We Minor Na Minor Parcel Ma Review base tee 1,250 1,250 - New Fee Na plus each lot 75 75 New Fee n/a Minor Subdivision Map- Acceptance of Improvements and Dedications 563 - 563 _ New Fee Ma Mmor Subdivision Ma AmerMment of Subdivision A reemem 300 S. New Fee Na New lot fee . Actual Coo - Actual Cost - New Fee Na Base Ma Revision Fee 25 25 - New Fee We Grease Trap Plan Raview Fee 75 75 - New Fee We Docurnent Retneval Fee 50 so - New Fee Na Stop Signs, each intersection installed CI 375 375 - New Fee Na Street Lights, each intersection installed C 125 125 - New Fee n/a Seed Bums each installed b City 313 313 - New Fee Na Parade Perim 75 25 - New Fee N a Parch Mer e 300 300 New F-ee _ nru The Finance Ueparttnant tfor th Finance e administrstlon of psyrDR accounting purchasl ration of the Clly s budget and reports to regulatory agencies SF checks , 41 , - 1 . Pe, Cora code 1. 1 maorcwm ally waole cnar2e for first NSF check is $25 and for second and each subsequenl NSF check is $35 a Slot, amenVCheck re-issuance 41 41 New Fee Na Yard Sale Permit 17 17 Now Fee Na Bud et/CAFR/CIP Documents - Actual Coo - Actual Cosl Actual Cost New Fee Na Business License Listing on CO 8- 9 New Fee Na Business License Processing Fees Business Processin Fee/Pennit Fee 184 ibl New Fss rua Annual Renewal Processing Fee 97 97 New Fes Na Duplicate Certificate 54 54 New Fee Na Change of Location 44 44 New Fee No 44 • APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FEE ANALYSIS Fully Burdened Rate Full Cost Recovery Fee Subsidy (full cost (per occurancdcase( Third Party/ Required Fee (Includes 3rd partyl Current Fee recovery fee less required fees( current feel ServlcelA llcation Fee Notes w o se Fee Notes Fee Parks 6 Recreation The Parks and Recreation Department administers and coordinates all park, recreation, and related functions In the City. Specifically, the department coordinates all recreation programs, classes, adultrouth sports leagues, special events, civic and cultural programs, and volunteer services. 'Note: See Report for the Macro Cost vs. Revenue Analysis of the Parks d Recreation Department 45 r: 9 0 0 APPENDIX B: FULL-COST COST ALLOCATION PLAN MuniFinancial 46 17-1 MMuniFinancial • Memorandum DATE August 4, 2006 TO: Oliver Chi, Director of Administrative Services FROM: Toyasha Black, Senior Analyst CC: Marshall Eyerman, Principal-in-Charge SUBJECT: City of Rosemead Full-Cost Allocation Plan The City of Rosemead asked that we conduct a Full-Cost Allocation Plan to be used strictly in conjunction with the City's User Fee Study. As such, this Plan is not Office of Management and Budget compliant and can therefore not be used for the purposes of being reimbursed for grant funds. Instead, this cost allocation plan summarizes an analysis to determine the appropriate allocation of costs from the City's central services departments to all other operating departments. Central service department funds are allocable because they provide services and support to operating departments. In addition, these cost centers conduct operations necessary to serve the community. To ensure that all costs associated within the provision of central services are appropriately allocated to the respective operating departments, we analyzed and identified all central services expenditures to determine which are allocable to operating departments as indirect costs, otherwise known as overhead costs. With the exception of fifteen percent (15%) of the City Council's budget of $52,106, which is unallocable, all other central services department budgets are one hundred percent (1009/6) allocated to operating departments. Depreciation expenses incurred by the central services departments are not included in this plan. The table and chart below presents the total indirect cost of $3,345,745 to be allocated to the operating programs. Total Indirect Cost Summary, - Central Service Departments Total Allocable Budget City Council S 295,265 Administration 1,437,570 460. "~aw City Clerk 863,760 all" Finance 584,900 City Treasurer 300 City Attornev 163,940 Total Indirect Cost $ 3,345,735 MMuni inancial 1 • • As mentioned, the above allocations will be used in conjunction with the City's User Fee Study to ensure that the City's General Fund is not subsidizing user type services. Attached is a detailed summary of how the central services fees were allocated by each line item in the City's FY 2006/07 Operating Budget. The Tables are summarized as follows: • Table Al: Budget Summary. Summarizes the City's FY 2006/07 Budget by department. Each budget is broken down into three categories: personnel, operating, and capital costs. Fifteen percent (15%) of the City Council's budget is considered unallocable because it is for ceremonial related duties. • Table A2: Distribution Bases. This Table is used to allocate the central services department costs. Unlike Table Al, it omits capital improvement costs. • Table 1 City Council Cost Allocation Summary. Allocates 85% of the City Council's budget of $295,265 to both central services and operating departments. Fifteen percent (15%) of the City Council's budget of $52,106 is reserved for ceremonial duties and is thus unallocable. • Table 2 Administration Cost Allocation Summary. Allocates 100% of the Administration's budget of $1,437,570 to both central services and operating departments. • Table 3 City Clerk Cost Allocation Summary. Allocates 100% of the City Clerks' budget of $863,760 to both central services and operating departments. • Table 4 Finance Cost Allocation Summary. Allocates 100% of the Finance's budget of $584,900 to both central services and operating departments. • Table 5 City Treasure Cost Allocation Summary. Allocates 100% of the City Treasure's budget of $300 to both central services and operating departments. • Table 6 City Attorney Cost Allocation Summary. Allocates 100% of the City Attorney's budget of $163,940 to both central services and operating departments. • Table 7 Total Indirect Cost Summary. The first step of this table summarizes all central services costs allocated to both central and operating departments. The second step allocates the indirect costs from the central service departments to operating departments only. This process is accomplished by calculating the indirect costs for the central service departments (after the first step is complete), subtracting them out, and then allocating them to the operating departments. Therefore, all central service departments' costs are passed on to operating departments. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Toyasha Black by telephone at (951) 587-3530 or e-mail at toyashab(i~nuni.com. Table A1: Budget Summary A B C D F F G 0 r City Council 4100 f 1-1,870 f 4S,S00 S f 347,370 15.00". f 52.106 %-i-d IS°•. of the mul departinmrtl f 293,263 hndga a mt +.rrnnnmal rrl4rrd dun!<. Adno-t, nr,n 41 I- I,'-24,7M0 212,780 - 1.437.570 O.Oir. - 1.437.370 C0r Clerk 4120 267.11- 596,650 863,760 O.OIr. HO 7611 F-rsee 4130 4'_8.710 1i6.190 581,9(X) 011(r•. SS4.von (atv- Truaurer 4140 .100 1110 0.W1. - w0 (:rtr.lttorne 41511 161940 163940 0.(X)°'. In1,a4n Huddmg 4190 670.400 129,000 799,44X1 C,,mtnun,ty Prtunnnn0 4200 WOO U3,600 City Garage 4240 17.100 3-,100 67,400 1a F-( rcemu,t 4.1011 6,020,440 50,(X6) 6.0-11,440 P.krng Connol 4310 215.810 114,200 610,010 C rnrsrng Guard 4320 139,570 1,000 140,570 Annnal Requlannna 4330 75,011() 75,0311 Street Lghnng •110) 137,000 117,16X1 Emerge- y Sk-ct,t 41W 6,000 OHM Narconcs Forferturei k-ure 4360 9,410 62,500 71,910 Construction -Street, 8r H,gha'acs 4500 10,1147,840 10,1147,8441 Traffic.Admmittnnon 4510 6.40 61,%0 67.960 Construcnon -TrJfBc Srg-6 45.10 8,000 N,0(Nl Alaintcnanm Streets dt High-y, 46-0 410,000 410,0(X1 h1ainte-ance -Triffic Ngnals 461(1 220,000 220,000 MAi ntenanae - Tre"&Park warn Wit 298,80(1 2914,6011 M-Tenancc -Signk Srnrping 465(. 2()(),(6X) 200,IXXI Puhlfc Transit 4660 6N eV0 494,500 264,01) 1.2_17,3.10 Planning 47W 03,130 284,430 9,3(X1 994X8(1 Building Rcgsdanona 4710 1. 110.450 1,110,450 h-1nneenng 4720 321,600 521,600 Cntn.u ry lmrn•rcmruts 4744, 246,560 198,980 445,$40 CDBG 475,E 1071140 1,658,771 1042,179 2,807,990 Solid Wasre 1780 70, iO(t 70,5111 Parks _ldm.... v nnn 4800 165,470 13,90() 179,370 Parks 4810 I (,92,280 624,X6(1 748,27() 2,463430 Recreanon 4820 1.039.910 129.670 11,370 1,2001!950 A quancs 46311 178,410 377,(X10 106,6i0 662,060 Rccmation F-& ('hzrg,. 4840 99.470 263,000 362,470 .18uancs Pee R Ch.,rgr 4X50 19,051) 7.(X)1) 26,050 Din-- HrnraSc 4876 10,5(11 10500 Park Prule is 1x80 17J • f 6,533,900 1 16,220,081 $ 13,246,909 $ 36,000,X90 S 52,106 f 3,14S,73S Table A2: Distribution Bases E Departments Personnel Budget Operating Budget Total Personnel & Operating Buduets City Council 5 301,870 $ 45,500 S 347,370 Administration 1,224,790 212,780 1,437,570 City Clerk 267,110 596,650 863,760 Finance 428,710 156,190 584,900 c 'itN Treasurer - 300 300 it\ :\ttornc, 163,940 163,940 toil I nK 670,400 670,400 Community Promotion 343,600 343,600 City Garage 37,100 37,100 Law Enforcement - 6,020,440 6,020,440 Parking C ontrol 215,810 114,200 330,010 C rossing Guard 139,570 1,000 140,570 Animal Regulations - 75,000 75,000 Street Lighting 337,000 337,000 Emergency Services - 6,000 6,000 Narcotics Forfeiture & Seizure 9,410 62,500 71,910 Construction - Streets & Highways - - - Traffic Administration 6,460 61,500 67,960 Construction -Traffic Signals Maintenance - Streets& Highways 410,000 410,0010 Maintenance -Traffic Signals 220,000 220,000 Maintenance -Trees& Parkways 298,800 298,800 Maintenance -Sign & Stripping - 200,000 200,000 Public Transit 68,830 894,500 963,330 Planning 703,150 284,430 987,580 Building Regulations 1,130,450 1,130,450 Engineering - 523,600 523,600 Community Improvements 246,560 198,980 445,540 DBG 107,040 1,658,771 1,765,811 Solid Waste 70,500 70,500 Parks Administration 365,470 13,900 379,370 Parks 1,092, 280 624,880 [,717,160 Recreation 1,059,910 129,670 1,189,580 Aquatics 178,410 377,000 555,410 Recreation Fee & Charge 99,470 263,000 362,470 Aquatics Fee & Charge 19,050 7,000 26,050 Dinsmoor 11 eritage - 10,500 10,500 Park Projects - 5 6,3 33,900 S 16,220,08 S 22,753,981 0 0 Table 1: City Council Cost Allocation Summary Allocable Distribution Basis/Bases % Budget Allocable Budget 100.00"+, $ 295,265 Total 100.00% $ 295,265 Dist. Base Dept. % t Allocation $ 295,265 City Council 4100 $ 347,3711 1.53% $ 4,508 $ 4,508 Administration 4110 1,437,570 6.32"' 18,654 18,654 City Clerk 4120 863,760 3.801% 11,208 11,208 Finance 4130 584,900 2.57"5, 7,590 7,590 City Treasurer 4140 300 0.00".'" 4 4 City Attorney 4150 163,940 0.72% 2,127 2,127 Building 4180 670,400 2.95% 8,699 8,699 Cummunitt Promotion 4200 343,600 1.514'" 4,459 4,459 City Garage 4240 31,100 0.16". 481 481 Law Enforcement 4300 6,020,440 26.46"4, 78,124 78,124 Parking Control 4310 330,010 1.45"4, 4,282 4,282 Crossing Guard 4320 140,570 0.62/., 1,824 1,824 Animal Regulations 4330 75,000 0.33"4, 973 973 Street Lighting 4340 337,000 1.48"'" 4,373 4,373 limergeney Services 4350 6,000 0.03% 78 78 Narcotics Forfeiture & Seizure 4360 71,910 0.32". 933 933 Construction -Streets & Highways 4500 - - Traffic Administration 4511) 67,960 0.30% 882 882 Construction - Traffic Signals 4530 Maintenance-Streets& Highways 4600 410,000 1.80"'„ 5,320 5,320 111aintenancc -Traffic Signals 4630 220,000 0.97'" 2,855 2,855 Maintenance-Trees& Parkways 46411 298,800 1.31"., 3,877 3,877 Maintenance - Sign & Stripping 4650 200,000 0.88°". 2,595 2,595 Public Transit 4660 963,3311 4.23"'b 12,501 12,501 Planning 4700 987,580 4.344'" 12,815 12,815 Building Regulations 4710 1,130,450 4.97" 14,669 14,669 Engineering 4720 523,600 2.30"S, 6,794 6,794 Cnmmunity Improvements 4740 445,541) 1.96"4, 5,782 5,782 CDBG 4750 1,765,811 7.76% 22,914 22,914 Solid Waste 4780 70,500 0.314'0 915 915 Parks Administration 4800 379,370 1.67i" 4,923 4,923 Parks 4810 1,717,160 7.55% 22,283 22,283 Recreation 4820 1,189,580 5.23"'. 15,436 15,436 Aquatics 4830 555,410 2.444., 7,207 7,207 Recreation Fcc & Charge 4840 362,470 1.59"4, 4,704 4,704 Aquatics Fee & Charge 4850 26,050 0.11% 338 338 Dinsmoor Heritage 4870 10,500 0.05"5, 136 136 Park Projects 4880 - Total $ 295,265 Per., i.~,,F;o- dcn,~d b. Jreidiug drpiamuv.l pet cannel & uperanog budgeuby the told personnel & opennr.g h~dg- li „able L"qe, .,r the C- i. A Jur ,b-d to -1, dq-t-m Table 2: Administration Cost Allocation Summary Allocable Basis/Bases % Budget fatal Pccsonncl & Operating Budgets 10u.1x1 $ 1,437,570 Total 100.00% $ 1,437,570 LI Departmerim, Dept. No. Operating Budgets $ 1,437.570 Dist. Base De t.'/. r Alh-i.on RM .:n t_-ncil 4100 $ 347,370 1.53"'" $ =i,94f, $ . l dm in lst ration 4110 1,437,570 6.32"S, 91x,8_4 9,1,824 Cirv Clerk 4120 861,760 3.80"54,571 54,571 I-xnanee 4130 584,9(x) 257'+'. 36,953 36,953 Cxtc I re-ref 4140 301 O.w/. 19 19 City AtturncZ 4150 161,9411 0.72% 10,358 10,358 Building 4180 670,4117 2.95% 42,355 42,355 Community Promotion 4200 343,6011 1.51% 21,708 21,708 City Garage 4240 37,1(X1 0.16% 2,344 2,344 Law Enforcement 4300 6,020,440 26.46% 380,364 380,364 Parking Control 4310 330,010 1.45"'. 20,850 20,850 Ctossing Guard 4320 140,570 0.62"'. 8,881 8,881 Animal Regulations 4330 75,1x10 0.33"- 4,738 4,738 Street Lighting 4340 337,00x7 1.48'°" 21,291 21,291 limergency Services 4350 !x,000 0.03"'. 379 379 N arcutics Forfeiture & Seizure 4360 71,91t1 0.32". 4,543 4,543 Construction - Streets& Highways 4500 hraffic Administration 4510 67,960 0.3(1".'. 4,294 4,294 Construction -Traffic Signals 4530 - - Maintenance - Streets& I ighways 4600 410,0(x) 1.80% 25,903 25,903 Maintenance -Traffic Signals 4630 220,000 0.97% 13,899 13,899 Maintenance -Trees& Packwavs 4640 298,8111 1.31% 18,878 18,878 Maintenance -Sign & Stripping 4650 200,0(1) 0.88% 12,636 12,636 Public Transit 4660 963,330 4.23% 60,862 60,862 Planning 4700 987,580 4.34'% 62,394 62,394 Building Regulations 4710 1,130,450 4.97"/ 71,421 71,421 Enpriccring 4720 523,6(x) 230% 33,080 33,080 Community Improvements 4740 445,540 1.96% 28,149 28,149 C DBG 4750 1,765,811 7.761s, 111,562 111,562 Solid A astc 4780 70,5(1) 0.31°'. 4,454 4,454 Parks Admrn,stration 4800 379,370 1.67"'. 23,968 23,968 Park. 4810 1,717,160 7.55"'. 108,488 108,488 Recreation 4820 1,189,590 5.23% 75,156 75,156 Aquatics 4831, 555,410 2.44% 35,090 35,090 Recreation Fee & Charge 4841) 362,470 1.59% 22,900 22,900 Aquatics Fee & Charge 4850 26,050 0.11". 1,646 1,646 Dinsmoor Heritage 4870 111, 5,x1 0.05% 663 663 Park Projects 4880 - - Total $ 22,753,981 100.00% $ 1,437,570 $ 1,437,570 I'rr..ur ,g, he d,• d ng drp,r rnr<,r,.. I par.,,nn.I & openrrng budgcu hr xh. ,ut,l peesunn.l & opetanng badger.. Tor.! Jha,ble huget it the Ad nun..... dntn'-d'. -h drputment Table 3: City Clerk Cost Allocation Summary Allocable Distribution Bases/Bases % Budget Total personnel & Operating Budgets I()0.0o $ 863,760 Total 100.00% $ 863,760 • D. Dept. No. Total Personnel & Operating Budgets $ 863,760 Dist. Bate Dept. 9'o All-atn-n $ 563,760 C tt1 Council 4100 S 347,370 1.53",, S I i. I na $ I tie Administration 4110 1,437,570 6.32"'" 51,5-1 i1,i71 Cetr Clerk 4120 863,760 3.80"s, 32,789 32,789 Finance 4130 584,900 2.57"0 22,203 22,203 City Treasurer 4140 300 0.00". II I I Cit Attornc 4150 163,940 0.72% 6,223 6,223 Building 4190 670,400 2.95% 25,449 25,449 Community Promotion 4200 343,600 1.51°'0 13,043 13,043 City Garage 4240 37,100 0.16% 1,408 1,408 Law Enforcement 4300 6,020,440 26.46". 228,541 228,541 Parking Control 4310 330,010 1.45"h, 12,527 12,527 Crossing Guard 4320 140,570 0.62% 5,336 5,336 Animal Regulations 4330 75,000 0.33% 2,847 2,847 Street Lighting 4340 337,000 1.48". 12,793 12,793 Emergency Services 4350 6,000 0.03"0 228 228 Narcotics Forfeiture & Seizure 4360 71,910 0.32". 2,730 2,730 Construction -Streets& Ilighways 4500 Traffic Administration 4510 67,960 0.301/6 2,580 2,580 Construction -Traffic Signals 4530 Maintenancc - Streets& Flighways 4600 410,000 1.80:. 15,564 15,564 Maintenance -Traffic Signals 4630 220,000 0.971. 8,351 8,351 Maintenance -Trees&Parkways 4640 298,800 1.316/ 11,343 11,343 Maintenance - Sign & Stripping 4650 200,000 0.88°. 7,592 7,592 Public"rransit 4660 963,330 4.23% 36,569 36,569 Planning 4700 987,580 4.34% 37,489 37,489 Building Regulations 4710 1,130,450 4.97"0 42,913 42,913 Fnginccring 4720 523,600 2.301'6 19,876 19,876 Community Improvements 4740 445,5411 1.96". 16,913 16,913 C DBG 4750 1,765,811 7.76". 67,032 67,032 Solid Waste 4780 70,500 (01°'6 2,676 2,676 Parks Administration 4800 379,370 1.67". 14,401 14,401 Parks 4810 1,717,160 7.551. 65,185 65,185 Recreation 4820 1,189,580 5.234. 45,157 45,157 Aquatics 4830 555,410 2.4440 21,084 21,084 Recreation Fee& Charge 4840 162,470 1.591". 13,760 13,760 Aquatics Fee & Charge 4850 26,050 0.11". 989 989 Dinsmoor I Icritagc 4870 10,5()() 0.05". 399 399 Park Pmlcct 4880 - - - Total $ 863,760 ' Percenrag, &--I h, d-,bng erp.u nnrnr,I p r_c w(I & ,per anng budgets by the totd personnel & opctsong budgets 2 Toni ill -!A, 1~„gor ,,i rhv (:m ('.Ink d-rd .nod:--h dTasneent. 0 0 Table 4: Finance Cost Allocation Summary Allocable Distribution Basis/Bases % Budget Total Personnel & Operating Budgets US)AM. S 584,900 Total 100.00% $ 584,900 Departments Dept. Total Personnel & Operating 1 Dist. Base Dept. % t Allocation $ 584,900 City Council 4100 S 347,370 1.53% S 8,929 S Administration 4110 1,437,570 6.32% 36,953 36,953 City Clerk 4120 863,760 3.80% 22,203 22,203 Finance 4130 584,9011 2.57% 15,035 15,035 City Treasurer 4140 300 0.00% 8 8 City Attorne y 4150 163,940 0.72% 4,214 4,214 Building 4180 670,400 2.95;0 17,233 17,233 Community Promotion 42(K) 343,600 L51% 8,832 8,832 ('it)• Garage 4240 37,100 0.16". 954 954 Law Enforcement 4300 6,020,440 26.461ro 154,758 154,758 Parking Control 4310 330,010 1.45% 8,483 8,483 Crossing Guard 4320 1411,570 0.62 /0 3,613 3,613 Animal Regulations 4330 75,000 0.331,928 1,928 Street Lighting 4340 337,(X0 1.48°5, 8,663 8,663 Emergency Services 4350 6,000 0,03% 154 154 Narcotics Forfeiture & Seizure 4360 71,910 0.32% 1,848 1,848 Construction - Streets& H ighways 4500 Traffic Administration 4510 67,960 0.30% 1,747 1,747 Construction - Traffic Signals 4530 Maintenance - Streets& I lighway s 4600 410,00) 1.80% 10,539 111,539 Maintenance -Traffic Signals 4630 220,000 0.97% 5,655 5,655 Maintenance -Trces& Parkways 4640 298,8(X) 1.31". 7,681 7,681 Maintenance - Sign & Stripping 4650 200,000 0.88% 5,141 5,141 Public Transit 4660 963,330 4.23% 24,763 24,763 Planning 4700 987,580 4.34% 25,386 25,386 Building Regulations 4710 1,130,450 4.97% 29,059 29,059 Engineering 4720 52-3,600 230% 13,459 13,459 Community Improvements 4740 445,540 1.96% 11,453 11,453 CDBG 4750 1,765,811 7.76% 45,391 45,391 Solid Waste 4780 7(,500 0.31% 1,812 1,812 Parks Administration 4800 379,370 1.67% 9,752 9,752 Parks 4810 1,717,160 7.55% 44,140 44,140 Recreation 4820 1,189,580 5.23% 30,579 30,579 Aquatics 4830 555,410 2.44% 14,277 14,277 Recreation Fec & Charge 4840 362,470 1.59% 9,317 9,317 Aquatics Fee&Charge 4850 26,050 0.1t,, 670 670 Dinsmoor Heritage 4870 10,500 0.05% 270 270 Park- Projects 4880 - Total $ 22,753,981 100.00% $ 584,900 $ 584,900 p<ncn i.i~r den.cd by d-dinq dcp.,rt-.1A p-onncl & operanng btidgero bl rhr -,l pcra~!nnel N ~gxten ng, bud~ri: ' 1 -1 dlr. aldr hugrt ut the Fins e d-rd, ced rn -ch department. Table 5: City Treasurer Cost Allocation Summary Allocable Distribution Basis/Bases % Budget I'wal Personnel & Operating Budgets 1111.(11"~ $ 3(H) Total 100.00% $ 300 • Departments Dept. Total Personnel & 11 Dist. Base Dept. % I Allocation $ 300 Cin• Council 4100 $ 347,370 1.53% $ 5 $ 5 Administration 4110 1,437,570 6.32% 19 19 (:tty Clerk 4120 863,760 180'!5, 11 11 Finance 4130 584,900 2.5794, 8 8 City Treasurer 4140 Yo 0.000i0 0 0 Ci • Attorne, 4150 163,940 0.720/6 2 2 Building 4180 670,400 2.95% 9 9 Community Promotion 4201) 343,600 1.51% 5 5 City Garage 4240 37,100 0.16% 0 0 Law Enforcement 43(1) 6,020,440 26.46% 79 79 Parking Control 4311) 330,010 1.45"0 4 4 Grossing Guard 4320 1411,570 0.62'!5, 2 2 Animal Regulations 4330 75,000 0.33"/„ 1 1 Street Lighting 4344) 337,01H) 1.48% 4 4 Emergency Services 4350 6,(M 0,0301 0 11 Narcotics Forfeiture & Seizure 4360 71,910 0.32% 1 1 Construction - Streets & 1 f ighway s 4500 - Traffic Administration 4510 67,960 0.30"5, l 1 Construction -Traffic Signals 4530 Maintenance - Streets & Highways 4600 410,000 1.80% 5 5 Maintenance -Traffic Signals 4630 220,000 0.97% 3 3 Maintenance -Trees & Parkways 4640 298,800 1.31% 4 4 Maintenance - Sign & Stripping 4650 200,000 0.88"0 3 3 Public Transit 4660 963,330 4.23% 13 13 Planning 47(X) 987,580 4.340.0 13 13 Building Regulations 4710 1,13u,450 4.97% 15 15 Engineering 4720 523,600 2.30° 7 7 Community Improvements 4740 445,540 1.96 io 6 6 C D BG 4750 1,765.811 7.760%0 23 23 Solid Waste 4780 7(j,500 0. 31",6 1 1 Parks Administration 4800 379,370 1.67% 5 5 Parks 4810 1,717,1 Gt 1 7.55% 23 23 Recreation 4820 1,189,584) 5.23°1 16 16 Aquatics 4830 555,410 2.44% 7 7 Recreation Fee & Charge 4840 362,470 1.5990 5 5 Aquatics Fee & Charge 4850 26,050 0.11" 0 0 u Dtnsmoor I lcritage 4870 10.511) (1•(15"„ fl 0 Park Projects 4880 Total $ 22,753,981 100% $ 300 $ 300 ' I'crcnnaga• denead br dn,.hng drpaomrnul 1--i eel & uperu-g budgets by the ton! personnel & operating budgets ' 7 uud alloable bugci of the t am I rearm dutrtbutcd to mch department. • Table 6: City Attorney Coat Allocation Summary Allocable Basis/Bases % Budget t Total Personnel & Operating Budgets 100.001". 5 163;9411 Total 100.00% $ 163,940 • Dgmuiments Dep. No. Operating I Dist. Base Dept. % t Allocation $ 163,940 City Council 4100 S 5ti' S 347,370 0.9696 S Administration 4110 1,437,570 199° 6,546 6,546 City Clerk 4120 863,760 2.40° 3,933 3,933 Finance 4130 584!Alll 1.62° 2,664 2,664 City Treasurer 4140 300 0.(Ni4i 1 1 City Attorney 4150 163,940 0.46% 747 747 Building 4180 799,400 2.22% 3,640 3,640 Community Promotion 4200 143,W) 0-9590 1,565 1,565 City Garage 4240 67,4011 0.19°0 307 307 Law Enforcement 4311(1 6,070,440 16.86% 27,643 27,643 Parking Control 4310 330,010 0.92% 1,503 1,503 Crossing Guard 4320 140,570 0.39% 640 640 Animal Regulations 4330 75,000 0.21% 342 342 Street Lighting 4340 337,000 0.94% 1,535 1,535 Emergency Services 4350 6,000 0.02% 27 27 Narcotics Forfeiture & Seizure 4360 71'910 0.20% 327 327 Construction - Streets& I Iighways 4500 10,847,840 30.13% 49,399 49,399 Traffic Administration 4510 67,960 0.19"/0 309 309 Construction -Traffic Signals 4530 8,0011 0.02% 36 36 Maintenance - Streets& I lighways 4600 410,001 1.140 1,867 1,867 NIatntenanec - Traffic Signals 4630 220,(x10 0.61% 1,002 1,002 Maintenance -Trces& Parkways 4040 298,800 0.83% 1,361 1,361 Maintenance - Sign & Stripping 4650 2(x),00(1 0.56% 911 911 Public Transit 4660 1,227,330 3.41% 5,589 5,589 Planning 4700 996,880 2.77% 4,540 4,540 Building Regulations 4710 1,130,450 3.14",% 5,148 5,148 Enbnnecring 4720 523,600 1.45% 2,384 2,384 Community Improvements 4740 445,540 1.241 2,029 2,029 CDBG 4750 2,8117,990 7.80% 12,787 12,787 Solid Waste 4780 70,500 0.20% 321 321 Parks Administration 481x) 370,370 1.05% 1,728 1,728 Parks 4810 2,465,430 6.85% 11,2.27 11,227 Recreation 4820 1,200,95U 3-34'0 5,469 5,469 Aquatics 4830 662,060 1.84% 3,015 3,015 Recreation Fee& Charge 4840 362,470 1.0M.t 1,651 1,651 Aquatics Fee & Charge 4850 26,050 0.07% 119 119 Dinsmoor Heritage 4870 111,5011 0.03% 48 48 Park Projects 4880 Total $ 36,000,890 100.00% $ 163,940 $ 163,940 I'cr cap. "p. Jcnced Lc do nling Jcpanmcnt At personnel & operating budgers by The rod personnel & operanny 1,uJkau rd it cable hugci 4 rho Coe 1rnorney disrnbuted rn uch dn+artrnrnt. Table 7: Total Indirect Cost Summary ToW Indirect Cosa Sommur Torsi Allocable Budget o1 r rnrral Sera Dcpes S 1,345,735 A6urAddi(ioval (.'ullu: uL7r ff.d(u. M..o General Govermm~u Dcpt Total liidirect Co.t ],315,735 From Tabk I From Table 2 From Table 3 FIRST STF1' From Table 4 From Table 5 From Tahle 6 SYm We I tbro 6 S SYbIrKt Ind1rM Co.ta Allontcd ro Crmtol S-ior Dept. OCOND STEP Dept S 490,609 PINAI. S'ITI City Council 4100 1 4,508 S _1,146 1 13,1X6 1 8,924 S S 1 1,582 f 50,156 { (514,156) Ad-mrstranan 4110 18,654 9(1,824 54,571 36,953 19 6,546 207,568 (207,568) City Clerk 4120 11,208 54.571 12.789 2'_203 II 3933 124,717 (124,717) Finamce 4130 7,590 16,953 21_.203 15.035 8 2,664 84,453 (84,453) City Treasurer 4140 4 19 11 8 0 1 43 (43) Gt Art- 4150 2,127 10,3,X 0.223 4-114 21 747 23,671 23,671 Budding 4180 8,699 42,355 25.449 17,233 9 3,640 97,385 341'. 1 16,734 1 114,120 Community Promotion 4200 4,459 21708 13.043 8.832 1,565 49,612 1 74'. 8,525 58,137 City Garage 4240 481 2,344 1,408 954 0 307 5,495 0.lW1. 944 6,439 I- L farmnent 4300 78,124 390.364 228,541 154,758 79 77,643 869,509 3045% 149,412 1,018,921 Parking Control 4310 4,282 20,850 12.527 8,483 4 1,503 47,650 1.67. 8,188 55,837 C ro-rig Guard 4320 1.824 8.881 511h 3,613 (,40 20,297 0,71: 1.488 23,784 Animal Rcgulanans 4330 973 4,738 ',X47 1,928 1 142 10,829 031M. 1,061 12.690 Srr-t Ltghtmg 4340 4,373 21,291 12,791 8.663 4 1.515 48,659 1 7(ri. 8,161 57,020 Emergency Seretcts 4350 78 379 228 154 U 27 866 0,03% 149 1,015 Narconcs Fork-, M Se¢ure 4360 933 4.541 2,710 1.848 1 127 10,383 0 36% 1,784 12,167 Construuurn- Srrcets dr fltghsray. 4500 44,3iY) 49,399 1731. 8,488 57,887 nffic Admmnrration 4510 982 4,294 2.SXb 1,747 1 3(X) 9,813 0 34'. 1,686 11,499 Construction -Traffic Signals 4530 36 36 0.00% 6 43 Maintenance- Sitters h highway. 46011 5,120 25,9111 IS_i64 IQ539 5 1,867 59,199 207'x. 10,172 69,172 M a,mena,ce-Tra ffic Signals 4630 2,855 11.899 8,351 5,655 - 1,(X)2 11,765 I Ill.,. 5,458 37,224 Alvntrnance Tressh Parkways 4640 1.977 IX-878 11,143 7,6X1 4 1,161 43,143 I Sl" 7,411 50,557 Maintenance -Sign & Stripping 4650 2,595 12.636 7,59? 5,141 3 911 28,878 101% 4,962 33.840 Public Tnnnt 4660 IZ501 6(1,862 16369 24,763 13 5,589 140,196 4911. 24.108 164,401 Planning 4700 12,815 62594 }7,489 25,386 13 4.540 142.637 5.00'/. 24,510 107,147 Budding Regulations 4710 14,669 71,421 42,913 29,054 15 5,149 163,224 5 72"4 28,047 191,271 Etgmeermg 4720 6,794 33080 19,876 13,459 7 2,184 75,602 2.65". 12,99] 88,593 ammuna~ Imp o-enrs 4740 5,782 28,149 16,913 11,453 6 2,0219 64,331 225'. 11,054 75,185 (:DB(: 4750 22,914 111.562 67,032 45591 23 1_1,787 259,708 9114/. 44,627 304,335 Sohd Waste 4780 915 4,454 2,676 1,812 1 321 10,179 0.36'/. 1.749 11,929 Parks Administration 4800 4,923 23,966 14,401 9,752 1.728 54,777 1 92"4 9,413 64,189 Park. 4010 22,283 1013.486 65,185 44,140 23 11.227 251,345 8811".,. 43,190 294,535 • 11 PLNAl. 5T0' f. 1,53u 4,408 1,777 Total f 29S,26S 3 1,437,570 3 863,760 3 584,900 3 300 3 163,940 S 5,345,735 3 (190,6091 100.00'% 3 490,609 S 3,345,735 0 Suaua.a4 ibs dbara.o f-.a I -a - dsp-, w.bn -A - dep--,..e „pm'w dq a,mwn ' S.M.- b. u d... wa..O,,.ard w.mw unu dgr.e,nu r du F.ev Sup TI uad a 4 Mdtn TI. pmaauyv a d -d b, d,.ubad dr mdur - db,wrd w e p --p dep.-, y ,6. u..l.aA-, - db.u d ...p.,uiad drp..u,,..,, d. F- pup " Pu.,bauuw ,n -h tap -j dep.na.e. u dr..nd bT mu6plyvd dr pne. W b, w mW u A- - A--4. -.I d.pu.va„ m d. Fa,. 9.p r~ L Table 7: Total Indirect Cost Summary • Table A3: Detail Distribution of Total Indirect Cost Operating Departments Indirect Cost Building Community Promotion City Garage Law Enforcement Parking Control Crossing Guard Animal Regulations Street Lighting Emergency Services Narcotics Forfeiture & Seizure Construction - Streets & Highways Traffic Administration Construction -Traffic Signals ,Maintenance -Streets & Highways Maintenance -Traffic Signals Maintenance -Trees & Parkways Maintenance - Sign & Stripping Public Transit Planning Building Regulations Engineering Community Improvements CDBG Solid Waste Parks Administration Parks Recreation Aquatics Recreation Fee & Charge Aquatics Fee & Charge Dinsmoor Heritage Park Projects Total Indirect Cost 5 $ 3,345,735 114,120 58,137 6,439 1,018,921 55,837 23,784 12,690 57,020 1,015 12,167 57,887 11,499 43 69,372 37,224 50,557 33,840 164,404 167,147 191,271 88,593 75,385 304,335 11,929 64,189 294,535 201,337 94,544 61,330 4,408 1,777 0 Sourcc: Tablc 7. 0 0 0 APPENDIX C: FEE COMPARISON MuniFinancial 61 rANIK 1.71 G1rr Cl- rrf■ CLIaIPAAtIdON City of Rosemead City of Pasadena City of Downey City of Montebello City of Monterey Park Ctty of South Pasadena Full Cost Recovery Fee 1 Current Fee ) Current Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee 6 Current Fee' Service/Application Faa Rob. Fa. Reba Fee N.ba FN Nob. F.. No%. Fw Nob. F&V V C..A. .1.n I-- f M f 70000 W MF"arM Wp FIbap M-he.M MOM Cad I Mr.rdaY fu d C d a Roa.nrad Mun.yd C. Bo.R - A-W C.. a80.00 Cob fwh a ►a ...s 618,50 146.00 M-OPM CCe 170100 -061 .10. 16500 W-. W Cad. b.aY rJa • .r.baarpoon (h• binhn t)1 MwKpJ b+ d r. S52 dwr0.. rvw rdu... 1.. n Cod..mrW r.MNar ad.dd0ar roe rr a wd ...d~arw) S.4-- U, Raoord. (Eadam Cede Sa 1563) C.py drrp w 55 M nb ria "W Goa -m.*-k'~ N. n..p.. egama, aM R C-V Cd.r Cover 16brm.rd) f.r p.p. al.adr Pa 69 p.p., 90.10 W 55 0.15 d..-t 90.15 va 0.60 .ddb l p'p (..0.. Na 0.,0 Par 9090 .1 mpy d 0.05 2~9090 addr-l p•p f dovrrr U ...W W-J dooArrnb s,dhe W-ft .rd pok, C--U, G 58 M Id. rd. Na ria Mb Oounw.Y rrt ar ad.brv r.rrrh M ria Na W. Adrl Cwt N. Wrda T" copy 780 Pk. AcV.I Cwt d AYbn 11.00 Pa Up. a arW p.6- "'.0 rd. 11.50 Pa u.a.b bw 70 00 1. , . W Mho w` Arrdo Tapa Copy d bp• aaa.hd by r.Ru..br 280 rtb ri. N. N. CO. Fbppy Dr.r, a Fbah Oma Gopr So PW Ac1W Cod of Wavers, N. ri. Na nb N. CO d CO a Drs, r 1r 56 M IV. .rb Na N. DVO Copy Pk. Ak.J Cod0 rY. .Y. Na rY. rY. DVD dOVOr or-Wd by V. 96 rrl. rar rrb N. r.1 P. CAy Cord rr..&q.,p-. fib Cdy Cored Ap.nd. m.hd M 50.00 Aear.. My N. for mpra 0 CRy 200 C d N. r✓a o.. m..enp .p.nd..+.er, orr • Crry Cord 8a..a.a n ."d 190 11800 onF/. 5150f. 200 Ead. rA Na ria .p.M...m nr..br C .fUE d Ooo.rwrb 100 5.00 Ca110.d doc.mrrt ria N. Na 10,00 Nobry Fw 1 M 10.00 .brbdpN N. Na R "smMPubs, R- 86ck and wHb mpw (85 . 11) AobW Cod 0.1 S Par o.p 0.80 Pa 0, r 90.10 N. 010 Par Pap. 0.35 Iy.O.d P.P a 5. 11 C.I. 14 Ns, M .is, Na M 0.5. 11 Cob. m P, 1a rM i M rtla Na N. 11 . 17 Cobr 1. N. nr r.b Na Na C- Sri. ~ Acbrl CPd N. ria Na Na ri. For racwh a1r.r bNOric 1am.lrpwaaW r dr em. n put Acbrl Cad N. N. N .rwd b d.. Ci b ne.r m lar Ih o..n w a r N. 62 TAAL! 7.71 C/rY CI.- - "Ke COwn.•wIIOM Service/ ilcatlon City of Rosemead Full Cost Recovery Fee' City of Pasadena Current Fee' City of Downey Current Fee' City of Montebello Current Fee 4 City of Monterey Park Current Fee f City of South Pasadena Current Fee 4 F- N.". F- Fr•b F- F- F- U0. Fa r•cpA rlsn sb 9onc bmrr<rspusbd w Mr • nmd wIW ~ prod•.e ^'FV r Derr.... r•e,fR1F srlydd• +,bN•1•. a F'J•Y funr4•on, •avcson, a proar•marW np•rW b padres er r•axd• Aobal Car N• N• N• N• N• eo,•r r•rab 1N N• N• N• W. W. M 175 N• rd• N• N• Na F•rbp•yr "a b•mp & bkwpr m•ps •rr Derr nms A-W Car NF N• N• Sp-WL d m•r.rR Ae•d C•r w maps. d•w- •ro rr• R-d• Shed Oe•b. AWO-M Rs•wal. R•ir r,d T F•w 156 M M rY• W. M C•rok~ Fnr e,• Frr 7e nh NO rd• Ns M _P'r to ps~ se rd• ,J• r,!• N• N• u^s • ``+ee~a Oabibrrbsn Tae nb M M N• rr• 'Irw,a wr sr mrw ev~~rser ' W r Prsdr~ss Jsrnl f. sr•a~r b Fsr ♦r ]o•F ' f:q J Oaw,N• •ara4 r fr. Nrlrw a a.A m• ' G` V 1Y•WbY FA 4yr. •d,•rC a An ]••l 'W r wsr•vp••• YW V bwY r Fw. w O~Y~ aA' 1. ]Obl ' or r•...o.rr.. rr wrr rc.r a r w• n >ax 63 • • T Ka l.ll CWeY OfKlCawrlMr - /1<ee COY/u1FIOr+ Service! Nutlon Ctty of Rosairi Fug Coat Recoaery Fw' City of Pasadena Cumnt Fee' City of LA Mlrada CumM Fee' City of Mollballeft Cumnt Fee' City of Meruerey Park Cumni Fee ` Ctty of SouM Pasadena Cumnt Fee ` Fee Iloree e.. a i.. s« Fr Ralee Lard LAe Deteb- ! - ACUd Cod Na Ne Ne W. Genanei Plan adudn bacM 107 Nor W. 38.00 Gim" plan Na Gan" Ran Ma as IV. Na M W. RecaMrumuon Sadwn Of Gotla 107 Nor We W. Na Zoning Al A Glance Chan 32 Na Na ^h Capf w eppnal¢ed A l W Na Z-" Map 107 Na Nor Each • map, 0 S14 Mr Nch Iwga ctua -1 maten each r map.. dbWs- and report Nor Z,ling Rqmmanal 32 rife Nor Na Nor 2 Ordl. 107 Ne Ne Na Ne Zon Condainal Use Pamxt (CUP) 2,033 1,%7.00 2,7e5.00 1,074,00 Fw sirba+amly 352 00 rwdence. S 9371. wmmwau 1,545.00 .66W R"-JDR) Cd+enerwelflteedermal ,045 Deeign Concapl Review I. mmor PriMd lees er.r 520.000 Mu~ for wee of a t- wort 51, ISO rw nWnrdat 358 00 W.Mcae Ibelvwen 520.000 and 9100,000 vuuebon rw wet w .A--1k), 11,9031w major po)act IS100.000 value w 100,000 e¢ R . a rw mrsitrrtlon F. (10.000 ea R or 1-n . SS821w was-:*. 771 1- 17*iin 10,000.¢ (t), SSS l la remade! (eatlnd mffeate rn 11- area mate men 10,000 ap R 13661 for ramadu (vem -ase in sow arda.F-* 755.00 Rsdenn. $980 *Jb Family Dewgn Review Ganwal Plan A-Wines (GPA) 2057 5,085,00 Aduel wW S7 000 deposit 2,792 N. $4,000 depouL hIv dodged howp rwae. 11he i 40 wet M,nftd Code Am-&-ft 2057 Ne Ne Ne Na Na Plwrnetl Oeveloprrlera Raww MD) 1 X37 Na NO Planned 1.355° b1 eacn adeon.l Id Ne Na Reaw Fmre Ordnance RFO - Monalms re 945 M Nor Nor Na N• Reloraaon Impad R RIR - Slohb Hoare Pwks 3,234 Ne Na Ne Nor TantaMa Pwcel I Tred Map (TPIA I TIM) 2.418 Bra lea Iw Umaare 2,627 00 panel . map, !2,870 Era inlits lee lir IenlaWa Irad n". F. tblawha bad map. 51034 1., 1 385 tmaWe pw a m qua 555 psi bthina and 837.00 555 for each addaonM bWM T.M.W. Penal map, 1,085.00 51,790 Tedaeve bad map Teldetlve Parcel I Tract Maps Par Lit 2.418 Iva Na Na Nor Fang FN 1,1M Appel to SWrZw" 711.00 Adrm~abNtmuq 0r 1.215 aApo" m d d°r" Na Aaped Ill Cay Corarc5 $51 $ill wpaww Milm all nCindbe Appeal to Planning 815.00 Ccecommewn w C(U' Putlk MaMng FM 720 420 IcMan Conbuerrcend r11a Ne Na Clew Mma Penn 1,385 Na nA nif. N Na Sde Plan Revew 3.051 Nor Retlevdipmant aill, 1.200 plWelavebn ravtaw SNplan,.A- 1,280 and CM. Carew rsinaw 330 St pten rerinv Nor Eml-ini d Impad Aaese M llrA Stuoy) 6.1 M 1450.00 S Em'rOce1e~ Na rue Nor 435.00 Plu 5285 d Pu00c Worlu review ne.ded • • T:.- a.ar COrr.rurvrrr OrvraonrprwT - Frr1 City of Rosemead Cky of Pasadena Clry of La Mlmds City of Montebello City of Monterey Park City of South Pasadena Full Coat Recovery Fast Cumnt Fee' Cumne Foe ` Current Foe' Cumnt Fee ` Current Fee ` SeMce/ kaUon rr.+ r.. u.r.. r.. x.-.. w.. rm. r.. rsvr.. N.gat- O.daneon - Inhwas IH Dowd- CWaL"I is reaped. 1- aaala to m w Mal dw • %ot total coal tar adMm9 Wva eat 0,683 Ne 1.280 IV. 275 55.00 P. eppicaaon Mdpetad N.O.W. OadwW- - I-M- IH Dotarde mraraaM a i.pa.d, fm walk to comad cat dl.. • 6.683 N. Ne N. Ne 2211.00 %d total cal to ridt-W.M. cast Pk. 1251. np I.. ISumir Inh01a.,- 14,000 deposit, h/y OR • Ineoras (N oufa% ost a ragsr.d la wp* 95,000 d•Ik-srt r i3,000 d.pa8 drw). plus Out— to -*AM aeotead howdy Uric to eontrea seat dot a %ot mIr cat for ednne.traev. cat 13.810 Ac W Cost r.qulr.d AMW cat t.ger.d 1 216 12S for p-anp el 1.323 1... P k con.u8anr. rat- pl. euukl. N.- at oat dot 15% , a.b P.W.t-(Slab mandel.d .drrxnWrsW./- Map Fst- 1 226 N. N• N• We N. 116- t.a Line Adu.b-M I Z25 1471 00 Ld Me nc Na 1 034 441 Lot Yn. 290.00 Lr PM cal Report 2065 Not rW Not N. Not Oak Tr.s Port- 1,703 Not We N. Ne M Zoning Co mpe.no. Lae- 432 We 275 Zominp lrta Zonrp-rol-ea 52 lever 185 CerMrab d wm bna Na Gans- Ber.4ae StwwmMw p.rna inspN90M►4rMpeceon. eenerarn.lnndamr, n edaeon to Steblea prdWa 2017 rye NO Not G. Sum. M Auo oerar. We W. Smrmwebr p.mM impearoM.-InepKaon, nallurad, in add*- Stets fa- 2.037 r" Na Na Ne Not Appeal at Pubic Nulaerw. Oasrrd-eon Is City Manepn. pryetl. m eaence. MN f oh b rNrdaW If appal a 2.863 N. We We Ne Ne Appeal of Hrelle Hraorroa Or.rrMrWOn it, City Curd, peye0h N edvena, haN of rdkrJr I. r.fundsre it apps- is 3.982 Not M We M- W. Nw F" and Application (MModeneous fermis!: ; pea W. Pa k-' LeundrydOry Cl"n In-City 501 Ns 12D.00 per edfaorW Not We Not - AdA Bus Mwi.. Soak Maus 501 We We Ne Not We Maas Pedor O Permit 501 Not ride rye N. rye Ma.a Ta<hnnen PamN 501 nb 300.00 Na We is Ad .h Bus U- Entedalnmanl 501 We Na Nft Na We S.N-Semp Slono, F 501 Not Ne Ne Ne Na Sent/ Cagan ilnua 501 rye Ns We We is Vebd.T 601 Ne We Not We Not Oena a EMerta- P.nna IReta91iMwry 501 rye 1,810 EM.darimara IM Public dente per day Ne Fonun. Ti 501 Na Me Not We We Mob!. Norm Pala 501 Na N. We We No Trop P.A. Ne Na We Na Od- Busetae Urenwa & hoots- cation fair, PC326.5 1,332 W. We Not Ne N 01,0imes and Animal A.rnda Tow Car B.pots AwebM Fianna for Those Wad Mar Inr.r o on 4M rVa Ne Ns Tow Car BWn.a Inspection Fes, incident to p.rmd talon 249 Ne Ne We Taw Car Hu.ina. Perms FN br Owner ant all aeelebnb 249 N st tlme ur a 11-agar a We Ne Na Not aartl F.- r.~ rc~.an P.metM FyraedrrleM rMe 2N rye Na P.U a~d,R~ r ,gno~ lye nra Na • • r.-. Z.21 Qu•tMY - C-onrLM • i . CCr Service! Yution City of Rosemead Full Coal Recovery Fee' City of Pasadena Current Feet City of La Minds Currant Feet City of Montebello Current Fae 4 City of Monterey Park Curent Faa a City of South Pasadena Current Fee e F.. tt.t.. w r.. ww.F ~ F wet.. Pared. Perms 1,373 r" We N• Ns Ne Tam • Use Print 2,295 We 215 rd. 220 IJa Yard Sre Pe 231 Ne We We Na Fuerodw Pe-d 256 rd. 2,110 Rte 1.W rear 200 nNMebl. lee Na We ANmd Prank K NAd r V1dou Mml 1.272 Ne Na Na We N• Ad-W P-Wt Ktrpttp -..1 o0tr ar ft- ep..r" 1.222 Na We We M M PtpdttcWt Fe- Mau- Pwty- TW- Rado rW Pltempapwa Produmon P Prediction Conq a 2.471 Ne 2,400 par pteason' pNM 15.000 depart for edur wad Na We Setdem Pradr.11on 602 Ne Na Na W. ' W r tert.rt o...wrr •.rr r Few r~ptc ' W w t. tar.'. to ws.Wr. m ' W r tt~erinsw a+rr rrr.n r. K m 'Wrw.r..t h..rr es.wr wstirM.~+r' atw • W w r w..rr.ttr rerrrrr r aver . r te rr m 0 0 T- 3.3: CarsyNrM77vs - COaerv Service/Application City of Rosemead Full Cost Recovery Fee' City of Pasadena Current Fee' City of La Mirada Current Fee ° City of Montebello Current Fee' City of Monterey Park Current Fee F City of South Pasadena Current Fee' Fee Ilotaa Fe, rlerea Fr .l.a.a Fea Fl.raa Fw Mora F.. 71.b Public Im vement Plan Review Fee Maio, Improvement Plan R.-(bace 1-1 S 150.1 WwFw M P1 kY11prYr.maa Pbn O dOkapec n P d Ma laa Pu1c 11wb c++p~ M • Y.aaa an NF pka each bl 65 -Fr M M aaab I %a1 appa- p Armor I and Plan Renew base lee 1.125 W F. -a.- 0 M pkm each lot 63 Ww F. M Na Final SubdiVl.lon Map Review Fee Maier SaYOrebn Yp ma . Final M Resew bee fee M,jor 1.615 ww Fx puvaV rasa b H pkA eachM n -F. , a7o's .rim ap.b. Major Subdh son Map Acceptance, 01 Im rhonta and Deckcsfi K 1 Epp Na. Fee 0poal pea acha1 TaKNW paloNb.q F.W YM map. • WrcN maps Maw (p G-.* M amrs'14' P.e %WS city faW WW map hunt Major $ubdiviab. l Map Ama,YlmeM of SubdN1a1611 ApfewnsM 675 Wr F. fa.xwae v.a as Oh6 1 ~7~.00 ArO.I mp nvl.w, 12.07V *"p pea ~ 6Aep map nvaw, 1700 4 Sew wparleap ea, 3.OW b Owe nwwl' 12.Opo br boor F.en..l St sao kr des ant b.a S.eer.ram p.rd ray pur lry 1317C 7,pp~p 11,050Iea ou110. mb Pw ales Yap M Mp, anel P..-q v.a . , .atn utvMM r701 .f-Angb. b p Mrnor ParWM Review bt.e lee 1.750 F. . a relF. Gun IW S]0 Cn each lot 75 Wes F. aeY bN MIw Such-ion Map Acoeptance of Im me114 end Dedcaeae el W. F. Moor Subdlvwon Map Amendment of Subd~ app Ww F. New lot he amr Ca.r Ww Fr M M Na M M Baas Map R-i nFM 25 W. F. M M M M M (2- Trap Plan R-I.. Fee 75 W. Fr M M M M M Domerera RWWM Fee so new Fr M 025 Par Pea W Ptacr.c.rh Pa t44.rE wlala o25 p-mW~ era r a W F,gwapry Pbra. re purp a bx _5 pep.a 164. 5. F- M Slop S g- eadt m[enaGtipn Mtal d C 375 Ww F. M M M M M Sllaat L hts, each IN..acbon metaled C 125 Ww FM M M M Na M 5 ved Bumps. each lrrtaled Grry 313 Na. F. M M M Na M Parade Pe-A 25 Ww F. M M rte! M M Parcel Merge app -F. M M M 40000 Pa trronrrdy ' y.a.zz w«w.......r.««.....v erv '4VUlrnsi«a Vrar •~w~ wen Q V neiWl it eater .saws w+rw ~ ~ Ap .~Vwww~ssrt rr«.s«aesrsw .vl~ew r+~ 7xc 'fS VO..«1rn~r«r w.r ~s~wrr~~.~~.. na • • Twig 4 3: Flrvwr 9 • r.- C.--- City of Rosemead City of Pssedens City of Le Mlreds City of Montebello City of Monterey Perk City of South Pesedane Servlce/A Italian Full Coat Recovery Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee Current Fee F Current Fee 6 F« Nm« F« Nw« F. Ne F« Neb• F« Nab F« Web P. fJN Cent 1719. meNram •b-W For Ua eel tlrd~, P6rr dWq br 6rY NSF E; •f rru vW of For ti roneal6uaM NSF 0h d. S ♦1 drrA b 305 W b f mm 6 15.00 3 25.00 dam' 375 •W 0 rl d d f 1700 R" d.35 M 6 2500 4 IMYM •emMW •aM el a•¢er l 25%a/Nor vhe of - roni~ Ur Y L w WOwOvrr• NSF dr•rA Stop fd/C1Mfi1.4.-.- al riref« M M M M Pa copy of fp pe-1 wxw For mplNof MlW9N po MOa Copy W BudpeVCAFRICIP Documenn AoeW Cod Naar F« 19.00 SeMwr6. M Per Om M p•q M mpw el 70.00 mP/: 370 oar amW AdW CoY q.a.k•e nral.reN CearOr•MreN• f0A0 P., aopF of euEpat WA, rrwwe' ierrN4 Mpon rrce w rrop. rvael A,.-W It p A GFR BWIMat U IfW LIW MCD eFYe F« M M M M M B-6 w Lk-" Process) F- 8uYneY Prora RV FeeF Fee I04 N F« ]SAO S5.00 MCMF. 616 t7rAO" 70.0 27.50 IYrrMVew e5.00 Pw w'rM 4.%4 ft eat An-M ReMvd Prouu VFee 6rF F. M no: 15,00 2750 Arorel ~ SAO DIrp6FAe C.."'r m. Se -F- M M M 1500 P. . •r 10.00 P. mnd•e Farr Chanpe of Local o N N•n F« M M a~r Ne^0•a 15.00 Al b Lbre•a M NF '.ru rr ,.a.e•rr ' a Mhrran••O•wer~ MYV rW.r Sd 'fy lurrYaYra Mrnh~ 1. )JO< ' 4 r rru•vn rrmr r burr r r... wc>Ww r r led • • • • APPENDIX D: FEE COMPARISON CON'T. MnniFinancial 69 0 0 Table 1D: City of Monterey Park's Public Works Improvement Plan Checking Fee Fee $ 166 minimum for a construction ocst $0 to $2,205 30% of Admin. Cost $ 166 plus 7% of consturction cost over $2,205 but less than $82,688 30% of Admin. Cost $ 5,397 plus 4.5% of construction cost over $82,688 but less than $165, 357 70% Consultant Cost $ 9,118 plus 3.5% of construction cost over $165,375 This is a fixed fee and applies only to the first two (2) plan checks. Additional plan checksk shall be at cost plus 20% if a consultant's plan check services are required, the fee will be cost plus 20% for City administrative services and may be required to be paid in lieu of a fixed fee. A minimum of $3,000 shall be deposited with the City when a consultant's plan check is deemed necessary by the City Engineer and it shall be increased from time to time, if necessary. Source: City of Monterey Park. Table 213: City of Montebello's Map Analysis - Plan Check Number of lots/parcels 1 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 25 26 to 50 51 to 100 101 to 150 151 or more lots/parcels Plus Fee 1,000 1,300 1,750 2,800 4,350 6,500 6,500 35 per lot in excess of 50 lots Source: City of Montebello. 70 LVLL 1.31 CITY CL6NM - FTLe CompA jIOM City of Rosenwald City of Pasadena City of Downey City of Montebello City of Monterey Park City of South Pasadena Full Cost Recovery Fee' Current Fee ° Current Fee' Current Fee Current Fee' Current Fee' Service/ Application Fr N.N. F. NOM Fr N.Y• Fr Na . F.a N.Y. Fr Wft. F&V d C.."-.1- Iola- S 84 S 200.00 M - P -n arq N. N. M a 700.00 =k 1- 11- ~OpT m. W cd.N Rarnr.d SA,nred Ced. Sad Aead C-1 V [oe. f777 Yr .50, C- e~ ..c.wr 115.00 L%-. .1 C.& U.-VW lrsrtr-e..ry.1 c° 0- 176.01) ~ 156,00 MN. "C.& Ymk M ~ 331 Me..epM 6-%. S r.vb ngrr M b , rl r Wrr cad. .s rW dd- 9w r.w b. MW .r . Sub,-- br R-m (ErW.nc. Cod. S.c... 15611 C." clrr0. o. 50 M M M A.W. C.M ~ A-i NYruY h M rrr . d.pr.nr..M C,V R GYnd.rd w C.I. C.P.. (pro) Fer.1 pop M..ci. P.r 5.1 pp. KIDW 58 0.15 des..sK 50.15 r DOD » M 0.10 P. pp W 035 2~ P.p. WOO-- p.p r.AdnP p.rpdY .ete CNr CV,. L 1 Se M M M M M ntam.tl.n R ..Y Doomrnr rrl In KL~M -.h 04 M M M AeOrl Cad M A~o T.p C.py 760 Il.Pr ~p1 M ICAO sent' psbn M 1t30 P.r..rY Yp 70.00 alp. S30 pr.+de. Wp, T.p C. d bP p-.Ud by H',I,- 2e0 M M M N. M CO Fbpy DW w Fl.. D- C.py 56 PY ` C'"d M M M M M CDC 0CD.r D1.kr ovd.d alts 50 M M M N. M DVD C.P1 tsl. Cant el N. M N. N. M DVD C"V 0DVDa b M M M M N. M Pw City Curd n- .y.adp.3.6 CM Cana Aw.rrd. nrd.d M 50.00 Ae.ndr sir M 2,00 1 vi a .autd...Nrt.rr M N. Cat' C.und M-m Id lea 11600 M..h..Ny. 5150br 100 EWt M N. M .wrtd...ml Mr.M C.roS.d C- W DwnrrrY 100 6.00 O.r.e.d docum.N M M M 10.00 N." F- IY 10.00 N.Yry rs°'-~ M M M lteprodYeOe. of PmbBc R..as BLKk W war mgrs 18.5 a 11) Aft W Cpl 0.15 P. pap Oa0 Pw 0rY PW.', 70.10 r.616-1 N. 0.10 P. Pap 0.35 2-l page 6.5. ll Cdwm . 1. M M M M M SS v 11 Call, mrr p.r pap 11 M M M M M 11 . 17 f..bi mp.e 11 M nle nH C-- A-I Coe _ • TAILL 2.31 Ci" CLKNK - FWK& CONPA MDN Service/ leatlon City of Rosemead Full Cost Recovery Fee' Ctty of Pasadena Current Fee' Cety of Downey Current Fee F Clty of Montebello Current Fee 4 City of Monterey Park Current Fee F City of South Pasadena Current Fee' Fee ke . FN Nevi FM Mete. Fee Ne.e. Fee Nob r« Mob Fa rec.N. wlwre ebceonc boner npwF.w w br • rwnrA.I.N w peerAd udr.1 oerrww. nPF.NY rlra4.rMVel. a rt"Q.Y Oerreasbn, erR.00r1 p pop.ww+p" Y r.eured b poMrw a wort Ackw Cer rW rJ. Na Ne rrN B.W wme. i88 M rel. rd. N. rJ. oe 128 N. nh rW rd. N. RaleOeplA e8del Ierr.p.r r.de., bb.pw.. rneF..r.d ed..r nmd. Arnrl Cor k• rd. N. 6p.ubad rr-" Act W Cow N nwq. drer- rd rd. Reeord. Sbred 08rr, Adearl e0-4 WFae .r.e T Few 185 nh M N. N. N. CA n Far 8w br m rN rib M. Ne Ne P. 58 N. M M1 N. N. ~Mrw a ti wc. Ll-- 2W rN N. M rd. rJ. 'T.yyl} 1pw v.rrY rerwio.o iu ew nrir eie • aPr.O•w\O.rd Fr tlrOY 4 [d Yr'AU} • Dy aee+..r. W...b a FFr .dFane r a AA r ww • v; a r.wa,+,. F... s..er mre F~ r. r. }.m • ca r r=w.m o.K..r..r sower a F.r..rr ore.. ,w r .y.. • • rw.cr >r-3r, eowwuw,rr orvr. oewrr.r - azrs cu.fw.wrso,v City of Rosemead City of Pasadena City of V Mlmda City of Montowic City of Monterey Park City of South Pasadena Full Cost Recovery Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee ' Service/ ilw1on r.. a. r.. tsd.. r.. h4,ba re. ahdr FN atd.. Land Us. Dntat- - Aca,d Cat Na rJe Na Ne General Ron ,ndudn arw ound r 107 N. N. 38.00 0 r.1 plan rd. G-W Plan Ma 65 N. Na We Ma Recd ,'.u uon 5ecaon a Coda 107 Na M Na N. Zw.n Al A Glance (:Mn B M Na Na COw of a d l A i n We Zonrlp Map 107 M N. E.en amp map. 9 S14 br each tarp m . r maps, ctua orl mbn -o dyams, and Pb nor rY. Zmin Re menb 32 N. N. N. rd. zonn,A Ordnance 107 We Na N. N. Z-Wo FN ands-famly C-011-al Use Pamela ICU% 2033 1.967.00 2.785.00 1.03400 35200 rwarre: 3 9371. 1.545.00 -rn-d DW9n Concept Renew for miar pr pa lath M S20,000.duason F. rrrmr.&WOn fat oat of ww" a w 110.000.4 M1 N I-). $1.160 fN aarmadete 5882 for mrrV d- Sngla-F.-Ov D-9n R.n.w IDRI C-,..Affl..S bd 3.045 358.00 pralecla lo-dwean Na ni. 771 (more than, 10,000 M 765.00 Re.raac.. $980 M $20.000 and 5100,000 a.), 5551 IN remodel Famey Dedgn Renew .aluNwn fw mat W ( What musts m Oaf .not cork), 111,993 ter NK me. man 10,000 malt/ Voted (5700,000 W RI. 3681 Vw remodel .akw N 700900 M R I.rm iricr.aa m sow $4.000 span. fuey GenNd Plan AmenAam (GPA) 7,657 5.695.00 Adud cat 17 000 a e 2.792 Na .1-trd h..Iy rd.. . ps r pre evbra coa» ML4wVW Code Amand-W MCA 2,657 NB Na Na N. N. Ram.d Plannad Devdoprlamt Rtnaw(PDI 1437 Wit rW 355 d-lop11 M 1 19. H. . ddcb, S30 to, own stational lot R.bd From OldnNrea RFO - MNtl.rnra But Ma Na N. We Na Rdoueon knood R RIR • Moea. /bra Pane 3~rm N. Na N. No TenWN. P r Ma s " I TTM l/ Tr 419 2 Sae M for bntr.e 7 00 7 map. $1031 f., F. ""'j". 4.d Rr 555 DN bllurN and Tafda0v. Wrul map a ce p act ( I , . map: $2.9 iwW 2.42 0 bass fa far bnt.W. hraQ M. 1.385 bre90ve Odcel 837.00 555 tor each add6orW b4una 1,885.00 $1.790 T.reave au o- map Tantaava Parcel / Tnd Mapa Pat Ld 2 4t9 Id. Wit Na N. Flktp F. 1 144 Appal to Sa42aNlg 711 00 AAHraatrerorfRanran 1 215 N Appeal to Cdy Covrd. 551 al l t Appel to Rannnp 1 , . p . Appeal of planning . appa $ o 8 5.00 mmrn.don or City Dlr.dw atom MadBaean Commie... Cmncd Prtle naanng F.a 720 420 = X d N. N. Na O4w hms Om pt, l 1365 Na 1Va Na Na Ne RedevW.J-ta Sde pan - Sd. Ran Rawaw 1,851 Na 1,200 paNdweeon tlYlew 1.280 as Cmc cam. fM.w 330 SU plan tanaw N. Erwuw ntal impact Arrsment flf.ad S.4y) 8.146 1.450.00 SInsal Ermmnrnmal nl. Na Na .35 00 Rua 3785 r Puekc VJOika re,ew needed 64 T..- 9.3, craa.a.rrnryr. vrvrcn erc..>• • rr.. cnwrr -c-, Servlul ileatlon City of Rosemead Full Cast Rauwry Fee' City of Pasadena Current Fee' City of La Mlnda Current Fee' City of Montebello Current Fee' City of Monterey Park Currant Fee' City of South Pasadena Current Fee ' r« ww« e« worn 1w w... e« Npaove Dad.r.oon - IM.oaa (If nu WA. cor.Ii.N Y requneo le. pu.4 to Wl .d oWt pk. a %o! tdd -0 tat d--u-. r.n 0,093 M 1200 Na 275 55.00 Pr appecmbc n MMpabd Neg.W. D.".*- • k.-h-111 dead. cor..Abd . req-d, Ia..quab W WAnd Con Pk. a 1fa11clal coal la adnarYatraN. 01.003 Ne Na nla Na 230 DO FIR - In-P- (0 o,4.4. caMr4. I".ad I" to coal -t pi- ■ led total am N, eft.W W .cod 13,910 lS Oo0 depWd . Ac0u1 CWt r-.d $3.000 dwoM Acted coat Pk. 5251. Iandtrg Iw(Stab mr.0.bd), PDA 1 240 US M pa"" or Nao. Of Pr.P.rm-(Stab 1.6 r.vbr, OWOV W I. oonWhnt 1,323 M aglW aorr6rfa Wa1 pk. 15% .dn..nf.h.lw WOO ~ t* O.Wd rm.. a- orbrd. W.b Ma EA-arw 1220 Na Na rJ. Na Na W- Lol Un. Aduaam.d 1220 1471 00 Ld bn. dpadrriimI M 1 034 441 Lot fm. 290.00 UA fro Gedo cal R " 2,065 rue Na N. Na Na Oak TL 'M 1,703 rv. Na Na N. N. Z-ng Compl-1.~ 432 Na 275 Zoning WW 52 2d.n0 Wraersaon bar 105 CraOcab of mm .nW N. o.naral S-i a Stc-iter WrrM IWpeleoM-padw, mrgadAn LW. In .dd0on b Stab few (Mclud.. Gw SIeOOW and ArAO Dwler. 2.037 rw N. N. Na Na addrom m r6nt. few oM►map.cpon. raafaurrrL In 2,037 Na IV. i. rib N. Appel of Pubes Nu.anW Dnarrnina.on W Cap MW"m, pryatle m ad,-, I..e of aadr h r.nmd•tl. N appeal • 2AW Na M Na IV. ru. Appal d PrMYc Nwrrc Odwrdrra0pr to City Counck pryad. in ed+ano., tall of which Ia ranrrrdabe d.pp.al a LTh,Ad 3.962 W. N. Ya Ne Na New Faep and App4coO t (7N.wYwee. Prwaa): L.undyrDry CS.. In-G1y 501 M Na N. rim P. ec«r., pea l9. 12000 O.r addbr.e W Ad LAB- Movra Book Maaaa sot N. No N• N• Na Mw Panor Op.,arg Parmn 501 nft rim Na roe No Mew Tecnna.n Perms 501 N. 300.00 Na N. N. AM Bua Live Edert.nment $01 No % rya N. Na Sea.5ernce Sta Faoli 501 N. N• hill Mfg ft Servo, Cozen Now 501 Na Na N. N. rW Vet11d1 Towt O noon sot N. N. N. N. Na Dan- 0 EM.nat mnd P.rmn (R.W WIhn) 501 Na Iota =...d 123 Pubic WnW pr N. I~. Tehn Sol N. Na N. N• Na Mob" Hach Par,. 501 Na N. Na Ne N. Tab. P.dd Na Na IV. Na Odra Su.k1Wa l./cnaa. BAn2a acsr.a Wilicallon PC3Mm5 1,332 N. Na Na N. N Buakt.a. end A W" PamlMa T w Car BI.Inew Aaarebnt Pnrrn for T71W. HM MM Irked Appbcaao~ 484 rft Na N. r" :w Cr 6u.urW. Impaction Fw IncidarR to pe.VI 249 rMa Na Taw C. Bu.rn«e Permrl FN Iw Owar and M W odaw, n ems al aP¢cat_c 2W Na rYa Ne Bock Party F`ern,t ,r.~iuow Prrdl /or Iirro.darler41rdo PuHrc Rr: yr.V':o 249 N. r" Na 0 • rw.ar a'.er Cow--- orvrr.o►..ra.r • iirr. Coa. S-WAI Mellon Ctty of Rosemead Full Coat Recovery Fes' Ctty of Pasadena CumM Fee' Ctty of La Mirada Current Fee Ctty of Montebello Cumnt Fee' City of Monterey Park Cumrd Foe' City of South Pasadena Cumnt Fee ' w am. sr e.. e1.r.. e. a« ^ PMad. Parn.i 1,373 Na We M• n/a N• Tem • L)" P-W 2,295 Ma 215 M• 220 rim Yrd SA. P.- 231 we Ne W. 5 Ne F-rks Penh 254 Na 2,110 P1u $70 m . 200 ialundabl. oceeu lea Ne We A si Perme Keepng NMd or Vwlout Anmd 1,222 We nb nfa We Ne Arwnd Pem Ke ne anmd oa1•r Imn Ogee toeall•d 1.712 rye np rye nh NA PreOtllen Faso Mean f+lcerte. TeWamr, R-% and Plnbpaphc Proirctlm P Pradua C-".- 2,421 We 2.400 P. ePplrro - 91. 15,00D dep.. far a w.t wan N. Ma swd.m Pr.doww am ry. rya We we •qru rr.v r_..r. an • A w.w.r~. r~ ar...ar rr r. m •ctir•.ww~..,,,,. u... ~n.arrr.~r r..~~r... rasa. 0 9 T..ear 3.3: Cwsrwraarrwo - Fire C-- ServieelA ication City of Rosemead Full Cost Recovery Fee' City of Pasadena Current Fee 2 City of La Mirada Current Fee' City of Montebello Current Fee ` City of Monterey Park Current Fee ` City of South Pasadena Current Fee' Fee More. Fw 1101.. Fw .1st.. itw Maw. Fw M.w, Fw Ilab. P13MIC I evalnant Pi.. Review Fee Meld Improvemtan Pian Reveal (base fKj 3 t Sa3 11.w Fw M P~ a~lOro..rrwra Pan CfwdAn.p.eal Pt.n rh..a bu 6.. PJc wiOrW anOrw.nre. P~ Ch.d M e ewe sn M -h W N N.w F. M M ..Iel. l { el App-dw p_ Minor Im ent Plan Ra Ii W bpsa im 1.125 N.w F. M oanenlCBOn rMw S« ~rW D N pkm each lot e3 ft. F. M M Final Subdivision Map R.4- Fee Maly n s bs W t M Fain RswW base fee 1.626 Ilwr F. l ~ on r. m.p d,,olye b..b 34 pka each la 7S /M F. x M% or l Ar g. Malmo Subd - Map Arxegancw of I o9efnana and D"cabons I Aye N- iw D"- Pee IaaW 7.Itl.IN. .ro.W W F1W asd nup. a roN nu r.v1.V Il C.." M ra11.n+. 0. %515 CRY Fein petal m. rwe MsJor Subdivision Map A3nwW-m w SubdNialon AW"-* 176 N.r Fw proolrap.0 W 1.7m m P. aI.P nwwr, 32J)" a.pow p1e p S,~ my r.ww. 37m W FnM O.rta1'a.ot m.p r1.ew p p q 3.Om b ev.. mM.ai, 12.000 Mr Was, uMIW; 11 lm w obminaa.IM M... StAdvl.on prwl ItaP dwdae 1... b 03.9 p i.p➢0 S1.050 pYaoa.loe ran. pr eel art m. mrw Mrt,or .del Ploww.e a,e .Whntrrle•I a lw Minor Parcel M Ravaw base 1N 1,260 M.w Fw tdi. C G,.Vr M wA p5e 75]0 Cq pk, each b1 76 M.w F. ppbyp~ bw Mm, Sub6O4*- Map ACoeptanoa of I v n-ft ad Dedca 563 molw Minor Subdivaion Map Amerldranf of Subd- Agtoment 766 Wwiw New le fee AoW Co. Nvw Fw N. M N. M M Baas Ma Revhbn Fee 25 Now F. M M M M M Cxea.e T Plan Revaw Fee 75 New Fw M M M M M Daa .M Raw-[ Fee 50 New Fw M oa P. p`p` of.." of pwk pops. Par 11.N old wh.. 02s plwlo oo" .IW wOm of EnpY rv Pbn. no dory. abw awns p.p.. bal. S. F.Mwa N. SIP each nI.rsectwn mstaaed C 775 N Fw M M M M M SI-I L hh each iMeM1ecllOn Irablkd City 126 4- F. M M M M M Spe ed Bum each Ina46ad C 313 N.w Fw M M M M M Panic Permll 25 mow F. M M rrr M M Parcel Merge 3m W. Fw M M M assw P`r sensn.r4N r.r u • • ' gatrwl.en rw r..w. aaww.~ r .a m 'rsraew.. ro..I..re awes, a,w. raw.~..w. m ctaww..w,,. twr sr~..r r..r w.~.w. ~ rr.. ,r 7oao r-L. S. 3. FINANCe • Fla. COMIAeIION City of Rosemead City of Pasadena City of La Mirada City of Montebello City of Monterey Park City of South Pasadena ServldlA leation Fug Cost Rewwry Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee' Current Fee Current Fee' Current Fee' FM Mrrea Fw M.N Fw MaM1• Fw Mont Fee Nwn Fr Ilar•a Pw C A CMa 1710 .awwer For M eY wu 1. PLA wWpa b ew NSF Eft w b +•fr or For Mw ron-Wb•rl NSF dleda 3 at warA~375wr S 3040 3 tam s me, 1)40 { 75.00 wr w ra wieaae+ra HaF elate xsa o1 W +afA o1 ~ Ma d.a w1a4 Stop PVPT*nUd*& f0-IaaWnp 41 N Fw M M M M _ Far oaetn N Pw auaPw nFOe r Coq of Budg trAFRACIP Doe-ft le40 Stets,-LID P. 0.35 a mem 00.00 oaq: $30 pr W Adel Caw ~ °11~ 1040 A r F ya aaP/ w Wdew w t rwvl neon ~ ft- wa •lar FR BuarneN Llutea LbM on CO A r F« M M M M M Dust-Lt.-Pro i Fans Business Ploca3sM Fe.PerfM Fee 1N IMwrw ]S.W SW k.c ..{la worcry 3000 77.30 t*,. FS eS.W P. p•rrNh-h-V Annual Renmuel Procefeblg Fee 07 W. F•• M 20.00 15.00 7150 Annul --I sm Dup". Certftete 6a N•e FN M M M 1540 vw def~+M a~1 10.00 Pre unYNtl peer Charlpe 01 Ln0anon N Nee Fw M M IS 00 Wwr Braaleu tlo.rr• Na M '..a`.a raw .....rr 'q r•..r.•. ~r r. ew..A.r ••d rw~ 401 ' or r 1. nn..>, v A,w.1 340 'grwaan.a.~ I. f•~wr awwa~ Aw rA ]FOl 'q rrr.rwn e.~r.wrrhw..o.Fw Ay1 tmt •wrar.r.. rr. awe rFw rw~a w w r u aas. •