CC - Item 4G - Consideration of Bridge Repairs and Preventive Maintenance - Mission Drive Over Rubio Wash (Bridge No. 53C0584 (0189))ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BEN KIM, CITY MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF BRIDGE REPAIRS AND PREVENTIVE
MAINTENANCE — MISSION DRIVE OVER RUBIO WASH (BRIDGE NO.
53CO584 (0189))
SUMMARY
On March 26, 2024, the City of Rosemead renewed the General Services Agreement with the
County of Los Angeles through June 30, 2029. The General Services Agreement allows the City
to obtain "as -needed, time -limited" services through the County, inclusive of bridge maintenance
and repairs.
In the Fall of 2024, the Public Works Department received a resident complaint about the uneven
surface along the bridge on Mission Drive over Rubio Wash (Bridge No. 53CO584 (0189)). To
address the issue, staff submitted a city service request (CRS) to LA County. The County agreed
to conduct an inspection and provide a cost estimate for the proposed repairs. These repairs aim
to extend the bridge's service life by rectifying the deficiencies before they escalate into more
expensive repairs. The County estimated the cost of the project to be $120,000 (including a 25%
contingency). This figure encompasses labor, materials, services, and equipment. In response,
staff recommends allocating $120,000 in Measure M funding for the project.
DISCUSSION
The County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works inspects the City's National Bridge
Inventory every two years per an agreement with Caltrans. Each state is required to perform
these inspections as set forth in Title 23, Part 650 of Subpart C of the Federal Code of
Regulations, National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS). The inspections are conducted by
the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works and the City is responsible for the
operation, maintenance, repair, or replacement of these bridges, as necessary. The last routine
inspection on Bridge No. 53CO584 (0189) was conducted March 2023.
Routine Inspection
Routine Inspections consist of both the initial Inventory Inspection (the first inspection of the
bridge, which places it in the bridge inventory or when there has been a change in the
configuration of the structure), and subsequent regular scheduled inspections. The subsequent
AGENDA ITEM 4.G
City Council Meeting
March 25, 2025
Page 2 of 3
regular scheduled inspections consist of observations, measurements needed to determine the
physical and functional condition of the bridge, identifying any changes from previously
recorded conditions, and verification of its load capacity.
In Fall 2024, Public Works staff submitted a CSR to LA County to assess Bridge No. 53C0584
(0189) and provide a cost estimate for the proposed recommendations based on the assessment.
Some of the deficiencies indicated on the report included spalling, exposed rebar, and cracking.
New Funding Appropriation
The total project cost for repairing the deficiencies of the bridge is estimated to be $120,000
(including 25% contingency). The repair was not included within the approved Fiscal Year 2024-
25 Capital Improvement Program Budget, however, due to the nature of the roadway conditions
potentially becoming worse, staff is recommending a new appropriation to fund the repair. Staff
is recommending a new appropriation in the amount of $120,000 in Measure M funding. There is
sufficient Measure M funding available to appropriate the desired budget increase.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Approve the cost of the proposed recommendations for bridge repairs at Mission Drive
over Rubio Wash (Bridge 53C0584 (0189)) for a total project cost estimated to be
$120,000 (including 25% contingency).
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-16 amending the City's Fiscal Year 2024-25 CIP Budget to
appropriate new funds in the amount of $120,000.00 in Measure M funding to cover the
total cost of bridge repairs at Mission Drive over Rubio Wash (Bridge 53C0584 (0189)).
FISCAL IMPACT
This project was not included as a part of the City's Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement
Program. Due to the nature of the roadway conditions potentially becoming worse, staff
recommend a new appropriation in the amount of $120,000 in Measure M funds for this repair.
Staff has determined that there are sufficient Measure M funds available to be allocated for the
repair.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15301 (a) of the CEQA Implementing Guidelines.
STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT —None
City Council Meeting
March 25, 2025
Page 3 of 3
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process.
Prepared by:
D nielle Garcia, Public Works Fiscal and Project Manager
Submitted by:
S
Works
Attachment A: Cost Estimate - Bridge No. 53C0584 (0189)
Attachment B: Bridge Inspection Report - Bridge No. 53C0584 (0189)
Attachment C: Resolution No. 2025-16
Attachment A
Cost Estimate —Bridge No. 53C0584 (0189)
0
N
O
O
U
G
N
0
a
v
O
3
J X
m LU
a >-
LL �
O
Z W a
W W W
Z W
�
W O
W
U Y
Z G
=W Q
U Z
Vf N
Wa
,ui
V
a
O
,� ..
(1) a) O N
0 o.0 o z
u L E Ln
0 a
a E
F-
U.
U.
N
f-
N i
Q
ca
p
?y
N Go~
M
oe
o
0 00
U Ln
U
0
M
L
v
r
u
a
0
2-
L
V1
m
0
a
7
3
0
0
` m
.-i
O
g
N Q
O
z
��
n
Z
U
cno
H
co
o
g
A
J
n
3
~
Ln
N o
n'
O
LL Q
a
Q
=
a
00 owe
3
U
i
Ln Q
E
v�
v m
L — E
rya
a
z
U
-C, m
U1
•a
L LL p
O
Q
m "6
w
m
E 0
L
O
u
0
.0
3�
F-
Z o,
O
I� o
u�
W
(' a
Za)
O o
J
W(3)
� E
O
hc En
C9 a)
N
Y
r
U
(0
a
—0
wa
oju _
C)
N a
X Q
O 0) a
ac
a •FA E
m I c
(A I o
O C U
0 C
C U '
0 O ra
N ('.) C U
#k ..'0 a
ZI
odoo4'�
0 0. a) (.�
C C
m X
a) C a)
Q) Y O
Ln 2 aau � E
U -0 0 C 0
a) 12 c .0 r6
V 0 O , C
O Ln U o
a c o
o a) 2— �
U y
U
(L) f6 a L
aap v) U
U v _ v1
n
fa x
N0
t0 a) M > d
[� > L L �
0'
o E n n o
r aJ ar a� n
14 NM V Ln
ww
u�
zz
Qw
w z
Qua
al Z Ln
m
m
I
0
Ln
Ln
J
`v1
i
2O
J x
Co
'W'^^
VI
vI
OHaI
Z
zWa
W W W
Q W
ce
p � O
W Y
Z Q O
m Z
O W
U Z
� N
W Q
W
C)
Z
Q
Ul
0
d N
W
U
Z
Q
W W W
a z cl�
co m
M
�t
Lo
co
0
0
0
O
at
Ln
lfl
O
O
Lf1
M
4
0
0
0
N
1
W
U
Z
Q
W W W
a H 0�
m x
M
,I-
to
0
d'
i
O
N
li
W
U pe
ZO
Z
oCQ�
[O x Ln
0
O
0
O
.1
O
1W}
O
O
Ln
M
r-I
AA-
0
O
0
N
M
W
U
Z
W W W
W
a Z ()�
mZ�
M
ct
LO
w
d'
i
CD
O
N
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
M
4A
0
0
N
It
W
U
Z
W W LU
W
a H ce
ED x
M
Lo
0
[I'
i
C'
O
N
R
W
U
Z
W W LU
W
a z cy
aO
z
M
v
LO
0
i
a'
O
N
1
W
U
Z
Q
W W LU
W
H
O
m
M
d-
Lo
0
d'
a'
O
N
LO
0
0
0
N
co
It
Ln
O
J
"O
N
C
C
10
a
M
0
o: 0; m
o O' o
O o Ln
0: 0: d
In
M : Ju+' M
OI Oi LU
O O r-I
o i 0 [ d
O; Oi N
L1 O? In
M E M i t/}
64i
,I-j;r-1Lo
J
W
0
J
D
LQL.
W
0
J
D
L
W
0
iLoa
0 W
i N
F O
i O
2 O
i O
i M
i In
N
w7
C
1
Y
ce
J x
m LV
a �
L
O t— ce
Z
zWa
!W i ce
W
L W
ce a W
Z
W O
0 W
U Y
ZZ Cc O
0 W
U Z
(A N
Wa
W
0
Z
a
O
O
O
00
'• O
�''
O
O:
O
OS
Oi
O
CD:
O
O
4�
O
Of
O
Oi
Lni
O:
N
Oi Ln:
N�
Ln
N
O
i Ln
O
O
O
C)
(�
OJ
i ID
M
.H
d'
O
i d'
o
Gl
Oi
Ln:
O:
o:
0i
o:
C)
Ln
Q
D)i
r,:
r-Ii
rn:
lb:
o:
ni �:
oo: M:
M
o
fPr
i O
C
ifFi
Ln!
Ln
O
C
if,
N
CO
fPri N
Ln
i ifl-
if}
E
i
fft
O
O
Oi
O
Ln! Ln i?
"
O
LA
O
L
t: L
76
O
jO
OOU
-ii
:i
oo:,
O
N r
pO
N
i
O:
Ln
V)
U)
a
C
Ln i
Ln
: ai
�
111
'
N
i O
N
j
i
i
C
C
(U
C
i
N
i C
N
o
N
a
-Li
mot€
i d
—
(Ao
i i
of
i
o'
i
i
o`: o:
�
y
o
N
a
+L
L
O
O
O
O Oi
p
a
O
=
Oi
Oi
Oi
Ni Lni
~
Oi
�:
Oi
Hi
M:
J
E
N
LiN
i
+Li.L?
O
i
`•:
Q)
UJ
o
>
rt 'A
LD z
Ln U
co
N
O
O
O
M
M
O
Ln
:N
0
:o
L
'E C
M
H
LL
U �
N
J W
Y/
LO H
r z
z W
W
W
�a
Z
a a
W
o W
U
za
nz
OW
U z
(A N
W a
W
z
O
J
1"
a
W
W
O
Y
O
�E
0
N
O
O
U
C
t
0
a
m
ti
W
O CO O LI) M
O O O N
NN It o m m
O] O Ln C) o o
Ln rn
ir ffr ctr i r fp
m
v o
J (U(O Q F
O
Ul 7
O"
W
E
F-
m
0
W
U
Z
Q
Z
W
Z
a
i
W
u
co
W
M
0. F-
O Z
U
M
J O W
a � i
a
E
W
Ln T
C m
E
E
Uu
Attachment B
Bridge Inspection Report
Bridge No. 53C0584 (0189)
Los Angeles County Public Works
• RIDGE INSPECTION REPORT 77
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE:
53CO584 (0189) RUBIO WASH March 7, 2023
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
(9) LOCATION 1.OM1 W/O ROSEMEAD BLVD (7) FACILITY CARRIED
MISSION DR
(11) POSTMILE
0 (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
RUBIO WASH
(16) LATITUDE
34°05'23.21" (5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON
150OQ4730
(17) LONGITUDE
118°05'16.57" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
NOT ON NHS
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION
SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58) DECK
7 GOOD DECK AREA (M)Z
513
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING
84.4
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
5 FAIR PAINT CONDITION
N/A
(62) CULVERT
N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS
NOT SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION
5 ABOVE MIN TOLERABLE (113) SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine -Roadway View (03/07/2023)
IT
Routine -Underside View (03/07/2023)
TEAM LEADER Richard Dergazarian
REPORT AUTHOR Richard Dergazarian
INSPECTED BY R.Dergazarian/S.Xu
Routine -Elevation View (03/07/2023)
Routine -Map View (03/30/2023)
Shaoli Xu (Registered Civil Engineer) Date
�_"4V
Shaoli ``y\
Xu
W P'
CC No.54749 7°
Exp. 12/31/2023
CIVIL
fl'lF Of CA0�"
Printed on: Wednesday 07/19/2023 12:02 AM Page 1 of 8 53C0584/AAAC/104327
Los Angeles County Public Works
AGENCY INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME
CALIFORNIA 069
(2) HIGHWAY DISTRICT
07
(3) COUNTY CODE
(53)LOS ANGELES
(4) PLACE CODE
(62896) ROSEMEAD
(21) MAINTAIN
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
(22) OWNER
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
N/A % SHARE N/A
INSPECTION INFORMATION
(90) INSPECTION DATE 03/23 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
(92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION
(93)
CFI DATE
A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO
MO A)
N/A
B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO
MO B)
N/A
C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO
MO C)
N/A
% Ownership Owner/Agency
100% City of Rosemead
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUILT 1927 (45) MAIN SPANS 1
(43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 1: CONCRETE
(106) YEAR MODIFIED 1974 (46) APPR SPANS 0
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 03: GIRDER & FLOORBEAM S
(34) SKEW 30 (48) MAX SPAN (M) 16.2
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
(49) LENGTH (M) 17.1 (35) STIR FLARE 0-NO
(44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 01: SLAB
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH Y JOINTS 2
NO. OF HINGES 0
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
RC T-girders and RC deck on two RC gravity abutments (original section) and RC box girders on two open end RC diaphragm
abutments with PCC piles (widening).
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(W) 53.2 ft (E)
OPERATIONAL INF• ' •
LOAD CAPACITY
(31) DESIGN LOAD 0 UNKNOWN (65) CALC METHOD 1 LF LOAD FACTOR
(66) INVENTORY RATING RF=1.00 =>32.4 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD 1 LF LOAD FACTOR
(64) OPERATING RATING RF=1.68 =>54.4 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING 5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS A -OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
PERMIT RATING PPPPP
OVERLAY THICKNESS 2 inches
POSTING LOADS
Safe Existing Posting
Loads Ordinance/Order Signs
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Type 3 Legal N/A N/A U.S. Tons
NONE
Type 3S2 Legal N/A N/A U.S. Tons
Type 3-3 Legal N/A N/A U.S. Tons
Speed 35 N/A N/A MPH
Additional Signs
NONE
Posting Date N/A
Load Rating Summary Date 09/30/19
Load Rating Type Calculated
Load Rating Tool - Date BrR 6.7.0 AASHTO - 09/30/19
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE
MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired
(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M
(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
Printed on: Wednesday 07/19/2023 12:02 AM Page 2 of 8 53C0584/AAAC/104327
Los Angeles County Public Works
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete visual inspection was performed on the deck by walking on the sidewalks and roadway. Vehicle access is next to 864
Commercial Ave in the City of San Gabriel. A County CAT-30 Key is needed to unlock gates to enter Rubio Wash. There was minimal
water flowing during this inspection and all areas were visually inspected.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
A Load Rating Summary Sheet dated 9-30-2019 is on file for this structure. While this report does not include a check of that analysis, it
does verify that the structural conditions observed during this inspection are consistent with those assumed in that analysis.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Repair spalls on the deck near longituddinal joints
Repair Pourable Seals
Repair spalls on Girders # 1 and # 7
Perform Deck seal on outer lanes near curbs (#2 lanes)
Seal abutment Cracks
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
DECK CROSS SECTION
(S) 1 ft br, 7.7 ft sw, 63.8 ft (4 lanes), 7.7 ft sw, 1 ft br (N)
DECK GEOMETRY
(49) LENGTH 17.1 M
(51) NET WIDTH 19.5 M
(52) TOTAL WIDTH 30.0 M
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 2.4 M RIGHT 2.4 M
(32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
(108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE
C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2015
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
(114) FUTURE ADT
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
19.5 M
0 NO MEDIAN
1-CIP CONCRETE
6-BITUMINOUS
0-NONE
0-NONE
2 inches
16380
(109) TRUCK ADT % 4 %
3 KM
19656
2041
5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N-NONE EXISTS
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 19.5 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD
(28a) LANES 4
SPEED 35
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A
(58) DECK RATING = 7
Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
Printed on: Wednesday 07/19/2023 12:02 AM Page 3 of 8 53C0584/AAAC/104327
Los Angeles County Public Works
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING = 7
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
16 Top Flange -RC 2 257 sq.m 167 90 0 0
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 90 0 90 0 0
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
There are unsealed deck cracks measuring from 0.012 -0.05 inches in width on the two outer # 2 lanes.
38 Slab -RC 2 256 sq.m 252 4 0 0
1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 4 0 4 0 0
510 Deck Wearing Surface -Asphalt 2 182 sq.m 182 0 0 0
(38) Slab -RC
No significant issues were observed.
(38-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
The concrete next to the south longitudinal joint is cracked in various locations and spalling. There is also some cracking on the north
longitudinal joint concrete. The cracked portions are on the # 2 lanes.
(38-510) Deck Wearing Surface -Asphalt
No significant issues were observed.
DECK PHOTOGRAPHS
a
rr
-
•!
1
.f
r
-
.. ...
. Photo 5
Unsealed
Deck Cracks
RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code 1 (36b) Transition 0 (36c) Appr Guardrail 0 (36d) Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 35 MPH
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
301 Joint -Pourable Seal 2 58 m 43 15 0 0
2320 Seal Adhesion (Joints) 2 15 0 15 0 0
(301-2320) Seal Adhesion (Joints)
The longitudinal pourable joints have adhesion failures at various areas and have failed.
331 Railing -RC 2 46 m 46 0 0 0
(331) Railing -RC
No significant issues were observed.
Printed on: Wednesday 07/19/2023 12:02 AM Page 4 of 8 53C0584/AAAC/104327
Los Angeles County Public Works
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 6
Longitudinal Joint Spalls
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description
No. Prot Defect
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
105 Box Girder -RC
2
57 m
57
0
0
0
(105) Box Girder -RC
No significant issues were observed.
110 Girder/Beam-RC
2
120 m
117
2
1
0
1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2
2
0
2
0
0
1090 Exposed Rebar (PS Conc./RC)
2
1
0
0
1
0
(110-1080) De lam i nation/Spall/Patched Area
Girder # 1 has three areas of spalling 10 to 12 inch each with exposed rebar by 1 in ch in depth.
Girder # 7 has delaminationon the web and lower flange area. The area
is about 2 feet in length.
(110-1090) Exposed Rebar (PS Conc./RC)
There is exposed rebar on Girder # 1 lower flange with no section loss.
310 Bearing-Elastomeric
2
14 each
14
0
0
0
(310) Bearing-Elastomeric
No significant issues were observed.
312 Bearing -Enclosed
2
2 each
2
0
0
0
(312) Bearing -Enclosed
No significant issues were observed.
Printed on: Wednesday 07/19/2023 12:02 AM Page 5 of 8 53C0584/AAAC/104327
Los Angeles County Public Works
SUPERSTRUCTURE PHOTOGRAPHS
;ILI .
Photo 7
Girder Spalls
DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
5-WATERWAY
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL 0: NO CONTROL
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
(111) PIER PROTECTION
N/A
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
9 ABOVE DESIRABLE
(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
0.0 M
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
9 NO DEFICIENCIES
(116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
M
(113) SCOUR
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING
(40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 M
SCOUR POA DATE
N/A
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
RC rectangular.
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 5
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
IN 0. t-roi ueiect
215 Abutment -RC 2 58 m 44 14 0 0
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 14 0 14 0 0
(215-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment # 1 has vertical crack measuring from 0.012 - 0.05 inches in width below the north box girder.
Abutment # 2 has vertical cracks on the abutment between box girder and open Girder at north box girder. Cracks 0.012-0.05 inches
in width.
There is a vertical crack below the south box girder on abutment # 2 measuring between 0.012- 0.05 inches in width.
227 Pile -RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0
(227) Pile -RC
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No
indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
SUBSTRUCTURE PHOTOGRAPHS
Printed on: Wednesday 07/19/2023 12:02 AM Page 6 of 8 53C0584/AAAC/104327
Los Angeles County Public Works
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE PHOTOGRAPHS
I
MALL -
Photo 8
Abutment Crack
OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Roadway Photo (Looking West)
Photo 3
Underside Photo
Photo 2
Elevation Photo (Looking South)
Photo 4
Map View
Printed on: Wednesday 07/19/2023 12:02 AM Page 7 of 8 53C0584/AAAC/104327
Los Anoeles Countv Public Works
•' • III , 1
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
S
Rec Date 03/07/2023 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target
Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Methacrylate Str Target ROUTINE EA
Perform Deck Seal on outer lanes near curbs (#2 lanes)
OINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 03/07/2023
Work By
LOCAL AGENCY
Est Cost
Dist Target
Status PROPOSED
Action
Joints -Replace
Str Target ROUTINE
EA
Repair pourable Seals
Rec Date 03/07/2023
Work By
LOCAL AGENCY
Est Cost
Dist Target
Status PROPOSED
Action
Joints-Repair/Clean
Str Target ROUTINE
EA
Repair spalls on the deck near longitudinal joints
UPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 03/07/2023 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target
Status PROPOSED Action Super -Patch spalls Str Target ROUTINE EA
Repair spalls on Girder # 1 and # 7
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 03/22/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost Dist Target
Status PROPOSED Action Sub -Epoxy Inject Str Target 4 YEARS EA
Seal abutment Cracks
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Printed on: Wednesday 07/19/2023 12:02 AM Page 8 of 8
53C0584/AAAC/104327
U
Cl)
N
0
N
r
0
o
o ca
-r- o
d ry
N
O
N
ti
O
3
0
c
0
N
W
a�
C
O
O
EL`
101
c)
CD
CD 70
•"o
4w
_ I Y
IA-
U
N
O
N
C)
O
M,
C
O
O
N
O
IT
m
E
(6
Y
U
N
r)
N
O
.I 1 t•ylr Y - ; - - r7' - - •;�°' Tr't,{zr
,, ,l' •� r .r ,. , a *`wr;,, ,�,. Ij1+..
1 ♦ t ,'1. �1' +1 1-� .ar . rl i + r . r ! Y •, Lr � 'eX. 14 t r C � � �. rl f } ♦ �•' • S(, �•r`tl � �. tf P^t r 1 •'[ ♦t 1 ; } 1• J '1 r r f ! � I * � 1i i
to om.
♦ t, � ''A 1 1 +~ 'j" � •' , �.I tr l 1 (,1 { Y�I•r'',�PI y7�'�p ( `�r t � } ` y4r
' '+ 1• a L.tr� � 111 T ti'f r �ty� f 1 l � �t,L'.:Il l'♦"h.�. k+� �Yr ';.�I�F1 �' •.r � � I •a' ; l�.rr .rr ff � e. .•�r t� �1 ',` ! iJ",a�)�
'14 f �: I rY ^a.. + •�� r �e _.fin t ; a' t rr ♦ r
� � ; :Fh♦.. e•iSt � 1 ��{ r r T �?� YI �' , .. � 1 r1 � �tii i}}}MV? [ o a
• I ' � - 1. . - k �. rtt � 1 .i s t (; • 11'�j 44 ? r rl 1J. �. -'t• w . Jl• tart 11 � � . \ • ♦ 1, 1; 1 1.1
< < �. .,y��i rat t 1 •'r� r. +.'� � .. 1,lI. i. a�
' 1 lr— r It r r� ,i� a r `,,�t , X} ;-I t!.j!., r '1+ 'r. •f I ' + JI
.rt.. t • .i•±i ra � 1 a• � '�� I i, �Ir ii,l � It � r a ,J
- e}-1 i ,.: •7 ra .. b` r r !+-` +.f, •. ;,. , _ `' •,I( y'�iY' ``�t ;,ir'";�l
j y. .,• � ♦ei i I n,, t..a r rl .� ,IrJ ` .Yf+ -�r i ,r ht I., '��.t+Y ^+,L `'a ��
`� � � � f Y � �J—�r-(a � 1 �: [ .� F a. , r r /JS� ,t , , t t•V+ YY ? iF -•,I
' , 1 t t r �.. r � •r• ,•� a' ia, t 1 r • 3r .1.•�a
Irt fir. f t r- r .� ?'::, I � 1. .t —+V •11 " ,. li1r 1 .'.a :�
. 1 �• it S � � ♦ ,:ells' � ' � , �I
,I •a � / .4 f,� p7 ��S,' tt J .r r i:. • � a-11 f }. .'rr••"(, rrYr1
1(.y " !F ♦ Ir it r tyt.
t � � t�'%Z '} a- rr!..� � I G � .•rt� rf �.1, iK , � .•1 r � � ).' ,�' ',�' '� -w
f%t r
M }� tMa ��C y•a + ,r�• �♦ rt ,; S•lTri� `y���l(J t rr - Y; , e '. .rr i 1� T�
i t j I •f / S �a,f _ .Y"N {y h J 1 r 1 Y ar.7
�} ♦ ���� �� 'L 4 't� I tl � `i a �T � + i s 'i{ } ► .' !; d r ' • t r
S"►LS+.{''[ ?l. ~ .'� y{,� :f yf� r i Irt r rfi fa, l;
i
f1�p��i ��• �I! I N � T^l �� y `{�! ♦ ..� ltfir• +Y �'�, � rr rt ..
:L,:'➢'.;i;i�}:• _i(r-'t`:i_:;ts fi... r r.'.•?i«'.. 1! r.;_t'.,ij"•.•� .. ...
LO
O
O
L
d
rn
Y
U
N
U
Y
U
tv
O
(6
N
N
C
U
� ( r
�'�!> • ' i°�► � yr $•' �f Y,v+ ,• .
CD
Ts /.� •t- ° `f ++fi�t '4 r� � a; -`� �• .I
t i10
1p
Air
I �
x
� I
1 '' •T + - �.~�~Y OFF
s
I aw b4 v'i� 4 ••.�., Y
LLI
i ��� F ;r ,.�"•� ,, may'
it I-f�.�... _ L'=iF• ^ 1f
i
Q I• �
70
7 COI - - {•h
76
0
m 00
IL �tiII i �^
� 7
O ' O
U d o
� a
,- kv, At,
U
Cl)
N
O
N
ti
O
M
5
� M
Aw
Attachment C
Resolution No. 2025-16
RESOLUTION NO.2025-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROPRIATE
NEW FUNDS FOR THE BRIDGE REPAIRS AND PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE - MISSION DRIVE OVER RUBIO WASH (BRIDGE NO.
53CO584 (0189))
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating and Capital
Improvement Program budgets on June 27, 2024; and
WHEREAS, amendments must periodically be made to the budget to conform to changed
circumstances following adoption of the budget; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget did not include the Misson Drive Over Rubio
Wash (Bridge No. 53CO584 (0189)) Project; and
WHEREAS, funding was not allocated for the project in the City's approved 2024-25
Budget thus requiring an amendment to appropriate new funds in the amount of $120,000 to cover
the cost of the project; and
WHEREAS, the new appropriation constitutes an update to the 2024-25 Budget approved
pursuant to Resolution No. 2024-30.
THE ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby approves an appropriation in the amount of One
Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($120,000.00) in Measure M Funds for the Project.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 251h day of March, 2025.
ATTEST:
Margaret Clark, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Rachel H. Richman, City Attorney Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CITY OF ROSEMEAD )
I, Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 2025-16 was duly adopted
by the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on
the 251h day of March, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk