Loading...
CC - 1973-91 - Amending General PlanCITY OF ROSEMEAD RESOLUTION NO. 73-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL'IMPACT REPORT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD FINDS AND RE- SOLVES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS: The Land Use, Element of the Rosemead General Plan provides that Lower Azusa road should be extended from Rosemead Boulevard to Mission Drive in the manner indicated by Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS The Los Angeles County Road Department and the Los Angeles'Regional Planning Commission have approved the extension of Lower Azusa Road from Rosemead Boulevard to Mission Drive in the manner indicated by Exhibit "B" attached hereto; and WHEREAS: The Rosemead Planning Commission.has held a public bearing to;amend the General Plan by chang- ing the proposed extension of Lower-Azusa Road.from that indicated in Exhibit "A".to that indicated in Exhibit "B" and, has recommended that the. General Plan be amended to provid'e,Xthat Lower Azusa Rdad should be:'extended in the manner,'indicated in Exhibit "B" and should have a right- of way of 80 fact in'width; and WHEREAS-`;The. extension of Lower Azusa Road as indicated'in Exhibit "B" would provide a safer and more convenient route than Would the extension set out..in Exhibit "A"; and' WHEREAS: The City Council has reviewed an Envir- onmental Impact Report concerning the proposed extension of Lower Azusa Road as set out in Exhibit '!B".` NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council that the Rosemead General Plan be.amended I so that the Circulation Element provides that Lower Azusa Road should be extended from Rosemead Boulevard to Mission Road in the manner set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto; and that Y Lower Azusa Road should'have a right of way 80 feet in width. ' BE'•IT,FURTHER RESOLVED,.that the-Environmental Impact Report of Lower.Azusi Road AsVset.;out;,in Exhibit "B" is approved: PASSED APPROVED ANDS ADYOPTED this ~l day of 1973... ; ATTEST: Mayor-o± the City of~`~ - Citu er i ~k 2. 4 ~ ~.f900 ~I ^ i 711. ~ l.~.u..-u-- ~ v ql r .wig I I =17- (i 6 Iii' ~ C ~ Q.. ~ ©vQ O✓i✓l~~y~~`. ~ I ~~y~ ~ n / u _ 1 61 I j ~ ~ ~ °-3 Al ignment proposed by Wilsey & Ham, J In General Plan adopted by City v~ CoUnc i 1 , Apr i 1 1 9712 J t s a 1SkJ U j j' y ~Q ~ i ~ %Sc/roo/ , C-1 _ M 2-1. 1 ^ 1O 's 43'S JJJ6~ 1 WJ 06 - ` ~ 1300 ~ / yc ~~JI ~ G- I Shoo! t R ; 00 K J Ja frr~ FR- 7, t U , fv'_F) v Q C P.O. trrv r.<_ f: 1 ♦ 1\} r~3 a r'_ii:"5~aa oo C-a 1't „•..C~3i G ~t~^ I ~o- 1~~~~-~cE s~ 7, <e'.:c .fr L'^Zi^fJ '-u S S 1 3834 L+-,utw r~ :sr „i"`+! ft, 1 i R-3 : y P.. i6J.Wi ANAL/, ~ ~~~~.r ~ ~I Imo- ~'•l ~ S,La I is • EXHIBIT "A" 61 - i • i \1 L-J ) ii )e~°.::- { X130 N' -<=~~i .mac, C I °'a•~s'•f •~:~p ICI. ~ / ~r F'' u .-1 l r m p I(~•.; iP_I Right of way proposed by l ( County Road Department, / , . Approved by County Regional I rob'! r.~ (i I1 Planning Commission, May 1955. ~ ~1 • ~ ~ i a ,J/~ F GiT N { r i <~~I 0 O~pB - N~ I~ C +~~4G•I Rnsoinrnod• f//P ;717. I . 6.106 4GVS sr OectG C-j -~•\\C WI p~j r 'C V' v~ W osoo " r R 1 c n d ' sic>-r Sc/ior,! ' 2I { -3 R-2 C Ii 1-j j:<; if~ Il C_~j Rios -3 c`~ SclC-_ r--~ ► r i I if n % EXHIBIT nBn