CC- Adoption of Annual Budget - Internal File 022~T
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager
DATE: June 22, 1993
RE: Resolution No. 93-30
Adoption of the City of Rosemead's 1993-94
Appropriation Limit and Annual Budget
Attached for your consideration is a copy of Resolution No. 93-30 adopting the
Appropriations Limit, the 1993-94 Annual Budget, and making the appropriation for
amounts budgeted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 93-30 approving the 1993-94 Appropriation Limit according to
Article XIII-B (Gann Initiative) of the Constitution of the State of California, and approving
the 1993-94 Annual Budget, and making the appropriation for amounts budgeted.
r
FGT: klo
Attachments
klo:bd\reso.doc
COUNCIL AGENDA
JUN 2 2 10
ITEM No.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION
FOR THE 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR AND ADOPTING THE
ANNUAL BUDGET FOR 1993-94, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS
FOR THE AMOUNTS BUDGETED
WHEREAS, Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California provides that
total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the City shall not exceed the
appropriations limit of the City for the prior year as adjusted for annual adjustment
factors; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII-B was modified in June, 1990 by the approval of
Proposition 111 and SB 88 (Chapter 60/90) which revised the annual adjustment factors
to be applied to the 1986-87 Appropriation Limit and each year thereafter; and
WHEREAS, the decision as to which of the factors: a) either the California Per
Capita Income or the percentage change in the local assessment roll due to local non-
residential construction; b) either the change in population in the City or County; must be
done by a recorded vote of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to set an appropriation limitation for the 1993-
94 Fiscal Year on those appropriations subject to limitation under Article XIII-B; and
WHEREAS, a proposed annual budget for the City of Rosemead for the Fiscal Year
commencing on July 1, 1993 and ending June 30, 1994 was submitted to the City
Council and is on file in the City Clerk's office; and
WHEREAS, proceedings for the adoption of said budget have been duly taken; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has made certain revisions, corrections, and
modifications to said proposed budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has caused the proposed budget document to be
corrected to reflect the changes ordered by the City Council,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the cost of living factor used to compute the appropriation limit
is the percentage change in the California per capita personal income combined with the
change in population in Los Angeles County are to be applied to the 1986-87 limit and
each year thereafter, and that the annual appropriation limitation for the City of
Rosemead during the 1993-94 Fiscal Year for appropriations subject to limitation under
Article XIII-B shall be Fourteen million, seven hundred seventy-five thousand, four
hundred fifty-nine dollars ($14,775,459).
r
Section 2. The Budget, as amended, is adopted as the Annual Budget of the
City of Rosemead for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1993 and ending June 30,
1994.
Section 3. There is hereby appropriated to each account set forth in the
"Expenditure Appropriation by Function Summary" of said budget attached hereto, and
made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein, the sum shown for such account in
the 1993-94 Budget Column, and the City Manager is authorized and empowered to
expend such sum for the purpose of such account, but no expenditure by any office or
department for any item within an account shall exceed the amount budgeted therefor
without prior written approval of the City Manager.
Section 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution and thereupon the same shall take effect and be in force.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of June, 1993.
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ATTEST:
City Clerk
1993-94
GANN INITIATIVE
APPROPRIATION LIMITS
1. Base Appropriation Limit
Total Appropriations 1978-79 Fiscal Year $10,052,215
Carry-Cheer Appropriation 1978-79 (638,304)
Appropriations Subject To Limit 9,413,911
Less Non-Tax Proceeds (2,415,574)
Plus Excess Fee Cost 167,997
Base Appropriation Limit 1978-79 $7,166,334
II. Cumulative Growth Rates
Cumulative Growth Rates Since 1978-79 Fiscal Year:
1992-93 140.0133%
1993-94 148.9084%
III. Appropriation Limits
$7,166,334
x 2.400133
$17,200,156 = 1992-93
Limit
Appropriations
Non-Tax Proceeds
Sub-Total:
Plus Excess Fee Cost
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT
TO LIMIT:
$7,166,334
x 2.489084
$17,837,610 = 1993-94
. Limit
1992-93
Projected
1993-94
Budgeted
$11,903,262
(5, 431, 406)
6,471,856
104,015
$6,575,871
$14,775,459
(8,525,783)
6,249,676
332,096
$6,581, 772
` Excess fee cost includes fees collected which exceed the identifiable cost of providing a City service.
Items are only included when their fees exceed their cost in that year. Items include, but are not
limited to, building permits, business licenses, recreation services, etc.
1993-94
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
SCHEDULE TO CATEGORIZE REVENUE
SUBJECT TO GAN
N INITIATIVE
Per Audit
Estimated
Budgeted
Actual Proceeds From Taxes
1978-79
1992-93
1993-94
Sales and Use Tax
$1,471,567
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
Franchise Tax
129,019
550,460
563,500
Real Estate Transfer Tax
29,789
43,000
43,000
Street Lighting District
74,034
377,200
380,000
Motor Vehicle Licenses
591,592
1,800,000
1,773,000
Off Highway Vehicle Licenses
657
900
850
Alcoholic Beverage Fees (1)
19,031
0
0
Trailer Coach Fees
4,241
2,810
2,500
Transient Occupancy Tax
85,803
600,000
700,000
Cigarette Tax
123,020
5,220
0
Highway Carriers (1)
5,926
0
0
Vehicle Abatement
1,700
0
0
State Bail-Out Funds
30,760
0
0
Interest Earnings on Tax Proceeds
143,018
158,266
67,676
Financial Aid to Local Agencies (1)
0
434,000
220,000
Tax Proceeds
$2,710,157
$6,471,856
$6,250,526
Non-Tax Proceeds
2,415,574
5,431,406
8,524,933
Total Revenue
$5,125,731
$11,903,262
$14,775,459
(1) Alcoholic Beverage, Highway Carriers, and Financial Aid to Local Agencies were combined effective
1984-85 fiscal year according
to Section 11005 (b), Chapter 448 of the Reven
ue and Taxation
Code. Effective 1989-90 the "
No and Low" Property Tax revenues are also included in this account
1993 - 94
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION BY FUNCTION
COST
CENTER ACTIVITY
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
4100 City Council
4110
4120
4130
4140
4150
4180
4200
4240
4250
PUBLI
4300
4310
4320
4330
4340
4350
4360
City Administration
City Clerk
Finance
City Treasurer
City Attorney
Buildings
Community Promotion
City Garage
Appropriation Reserves
Sub-Total
C SAFETY
Law Enforcement
Parking Control
Crossing Guards
Animal Regulation
Street Lighting
Emergency Medical
.Narcotics Fore. & Seizure
Sub-Total
1991-92.
ACTUAL
$117,963
691,351
135,267
360,632
12,196
266,586
368,222
431,430
63,131
35,898
$2,482,676
$3,858,416
109,565
45,851
31,477
215,120
7,443
5,065
$4,272,937
1992-93
PROJECTED
$75,280
614,043
78,602
207,200
11,340
265,500
394,345
379,573
23,640
100,000
$2,149,523
$3,910,720
113,576
45,117
40,000
235,000
4,498
3,209
$4,352,120
1993-94
BUDGET
78,500
482,651
1 10, 970
231,035
11,610
250,700
A30,000
301,300
32,800
100,000
$2,029,566
$4,288,010
124,480
86,202
40,000
2A7,000
7,600
9,100
$4,802,392
1993 - 94
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION BY FUNCTION (cont.)
COST
CENTER
ACTIVITY
TRANSPORTATION
4500
Construction-Streets
4510
Traffic Administration
4530
Construction-Signals
4600
Street Maintenance
4630
Traffic Signal Maintenance
4640
Tree & Parkway Maintenance
4650
Signs & Striping Maintenance
4660
Public Transit
Sub-Total
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
4700
Planning
4710
Building Regulation
4720
Engineering
4730
Redevelopment
4740
Community Improvement
4750
CDBG
Sub-Total
1991-92
ACTUAL
$236,203
583,849
329,539
0
119,817
572,227
$1,841,635
1992-93
PROJECTED
$613,100
32,620
49,600
3 25, 700
163,500
176,500
94,600
644,340
$2,099,960
$201,748
391,000
280,480
0
68,000
1,047,330
$1,988,558
PUBLIC HEATH
4780 Solid Waste
$400,042
29,246
115,479
280,987
155,098
171,342
65,122
618,884
$1,836,200
$95,495
$2,500
1993-94
BUDGET
$2,814,800
66,630
123,000
303,000
163,500
181,000
87,000
674,490
$4,413,420
$229,185
640,000
250,600
0
92,181
1,525,490
$ 2, 737, 456
$7,500
1993 - 94
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION BY FUNCTION (cont.)
COST
CENTER
ACTIVITY
CULTURAL & LEISURE
,4800
Parks & Recreation Admin.
4810
Parks
4820
Recreation
4830
Aquatics
4840
Recr. Fee & Charge
4850
Aquatics Fee & Charge
4870
Dinsmoor Heritage House
4880
Park Projects
Sub-Total
CITY GRAND TOTAL
1991-92
ACTUAL
$205,057
913,195
409,914
305,344
134,923
15,149
3,154
52,790
$2,039,526
1992-93 1993-94
PROJECTED BUDGET
$196,932
684,012
428,180
259,292
142,170
19,170
2,805
1,852
$221,880
835,160
441,630
264,760
154,300
21,920
2,900
136,018
$1,734,413
$12,568,469 $12,327,074
$2,078,568
$16,068,902
B. RESOLUTION NO. 93-30 - ADOPTION OF FY 1993-94 BUDGET
The following resolution was presented to the Council for
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION FOR THE 1993-94 FISCAL
YEAR AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR 1993-94, MAKING
APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE AMOUNTS BUDGETED
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER VASQUEZ, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK
that Resolution No. 93-30 be adopted. Vote resulted:
Yes: Clark, Bruesch, Vasquez
No: Taylor
Absent: McDonald
Abstain: None
The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
Councilmember Taylor stated he had stated his objections in the
Budget Study Session and that several items had come up that he had
reservations about and they will be discussed as they come before the
Council individually for approval.
Mayor Bruesch asked City Manager Tripepi to report on the status
of the State budget process as it relates to local governments.
Mayor Bruesch's remarks are entered verbatim as follows:
"I'd just like to add my personal comment referring back to the
comment that Mr. Tripepi said about the State finally
understanding the differences between cities. That understanding
didn't come from osmosis, it came from hard work in terms of Mr.
Tripepi and Mr. Vasquez and Ms. Clark and Mr. McDonald continually
going up to Sacramento over the last year and grabbing the shirt
tails, the collars, the cuffs of any legislator they could and
giving them an education in what type of City Rosemead is; that
Rosemead does not get the benefit of the property tax; that we are
a contract city and I think this City owes a debt of gratitude to
the hard work and the constant flying trips up to Sacramento that
our Council and our City Manager has made to really do a good job
of educating the people up there in Sacramento to know that there
is a difference and I applaud their efforts and the results are
that we are not going to be hit by this type of ax that they are
swinging at other public agencies and I would like to give my
applause to them. And I would like my comments in the Minutes
verbatim, please."
C. RESOLUTION NO. 93-31 - ALLOWING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT
FOR ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY ON NEW AVENUE (750 FEET NORTH OF
GRAVES/GARVEY
The following resolution was presented to the Council for
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT FOR THE ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY
ON NEW AVENUE (750 ' NORTH OF GRAVES AVENUE TO GARVEY AVENUE)
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VASQUEZ
that Resolution No. 93-31 be adopted.
Yes: Clark, Bruesch, Vasquez
No: Taylor
Absent: McDonald
Abstain: None
CC 6-22-93
Page 12